2. Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
These financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) for annual financial information, as well as the instructions to Form 10-K. Accordingly they include all of the information and notes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. |
|
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with US GAAP, requires management to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The Company based its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be applicable, and evaluated them on an on-going basis to ensure they remain reasonable under current conditions. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. |
|
a) Principles of Consolidation |
|
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of American Sands Energy Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary Green River Resources Inc. (“GRI”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
b) Receivables |
|
The Company has not yet commenced its primary operations and remains a development stage company as of March 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had receivables related to billings to a third-party company for certain research and development expenses incurred. At the end of each reporting period, the Company estimates its allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical information and specific facts and circumstances associated with each customer balance. All receivables outstanding as of March 31, 2013 have been fully collected. |
|
c) Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment consist of computers and equipment and are stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of 3 to 7 years. |
|
Maintenance, repairs, minor renewals and betterments, which do not extend the useful life of the asset are charged to expense as incurred. Major renewals and betterments are capitalized. The cost of property and equipment sold or otherwise disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any gains or losses arising from the sale or disposal are included in the statements of operations. |
|
d) Mineral Leases |
|
In certain cases, the Company capitalizes costs related to investments in mineral lease interests on a property-by-property basis. Such costs include mineral lease acquisition costs. Costs are deferred until such time as the extent of proved developed reserves has been determined and mineral lease interests are either developed, the property sold or the mineral lease rights are allowed to lapse. To date, all exploration and lease costs have been expensed. |
|
e) Other Assets |
|
The Company capitalizes costs incurred in connection with a stock offering in other assets. These costs are netted against the proceeds of the stock offering, or are expensed when the offering is aborted. As of March 31, 2013, $287,575 of costs had been incurred for a stock offering that were recorded in other assets. The Company did not have any remaining stock offering costs recorded as of March 31, 2014. |
|
During the year ended March 31, 2014, the Company capitalized $19,135 of costs associated with its mine permitting. There were no mine permitting costs recorded as of March 31, 2013. |
|
As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has $19,065 of restricted cash that has been paid as part of a reclamation bond related to the Company’s planned mining activities. |
|
f) Income Taxes |
|
The Company applies the guidance in ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes, and the recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting bases and tax bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. |
|
The Company calculates its current and deferred tax provision based on estimates and assumptions that can differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed during the subsequent year. Adjustments based on filed returns are recorded when identified. |
|
The Company recognizes the benefit from a tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the position would be sustained upon audit based solely on the technical merits of the tax position. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are included as a component of income tax expense. |
|
ASC 740 clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions, as defined. The Company has analyzed filing positions in all of the federal and state jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. As a result of the voluntary dissolution of GRC on December 31, 2011, the Company may not be able to utilize net operating loss carry-forwards generated by GRC to offset future taxable income. The Company believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and does not anticipate any adjustments that will result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded. |
|
g) Stock-based Compensation |
|
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options and warrants granted. For employee stock options, the Company records the grant-date fair value as expense over the period in which it is earned, typically the vesting period. For consultants, the fair value of the stock-based award is recorded as expense over the term of the service period, and unvested amounts are revalued using the Black-Scholes model at each reporting period. For warrants issued to lenders, the Company records the grant-date fair value of the warrants, and any resulting beneficial conversion feature for convertible debt, as a debt discount. The discount is then amortized over the term of the convertible debt as non-cash interest expense. |
|
h) Net Loss Per Common Share |
|
Basic earnings or loss per common share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings or loss per common share is calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the effect of potential dilutive shares during the period. Potential dilutive shares include preferred stock, outstanding stock options and warrants and convertible debt instruments. For periods in which a net loss is reported, potential dilutive shares are excluded because they are antidilutive. Therefore, basic loss per common share is the same as diluted loss per common share for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had cumulative, undeclared, dividends that had not been accrued as of the Company’s fiscal year ends related to its preferred stock of $73,600 and $0, respectively, which were added to net loss on the consolidated statement of operations in order to calculate net loss per common share based on the Company’s net loss attributable to common stockholders. |
|
i) Research and Development |
|
The Company continues to develop additional technology related to its proprietary bitumen extraction process. To date, the Company has expensed costs associated with developing its technology as research and development costs. For the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred costs of $923,774 and $220,406, respectively, for research and development of its technologies. |
|
j) Concentrations of Risk |
|
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of risk consist principally of cash. Cash is placed on deposit in major financial institutions in the United States. Such deposits may be in excess of insured limits. Management believes that the financial institutions that hold the Company’s cash are financially sound and, accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these balances. |
|
k) Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption. |
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU 2014-10 Development Stage Entities. The amendments in ASU 2014-10 remove the definition of a development stage entity from Topic 915 Development Stage Entities, thereby removing the distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from US GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of operations, cash flows, and shareholder’s equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations. ASU 2014-10 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. The Company may early adopt ASU 2014-10 for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company plans to adopt ASU 2014-10 in its fiscal year ending March 31, 2015 and interim periods therein. The Company’s financial statements will be impacted by the adoption of this ASU mainly by the removal of inception-to-date information in the Company’s statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or lease contracts). This ASU will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605 Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance, and creates a Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. |
|
The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: |
|
Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer. |
Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract. |
Step 3: Determine the transaction price. |
Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. |
Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. |
|
ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The Company’s current financial statements will not be affected by the adoption of ASU 2014-09 as the Company has not recognized revenues. |