| |
UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|
FORM N-CSR |
|
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED |
|
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
|
Investment Company Act file number 811-22303 |
|
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
|
601 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
|
Michael J. Leary |
Treasurer |
|
601 Congress Street |
|
Boston, Massachusetts 02210 |
|
(Name and address of agent for service) |
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 617-663-4490 |
|
Date of fiscal year end: | December 31 |
|
Date of reporting period: | June 30, 2012 |
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
| |
Table of Contents | |
|
Your expenses | Page 3 |
Portfolio summary | Page 4 |
Portfolio of investments | Page 5 |
Financial statements | Page 10 |
Financial highlights | Page 13 |
Notes to financial statements | Page 14 |
Board Considerations Disclosure | Page 17 |
More Information | Page 20 |
Your expenses
These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing operating expenses of investing in the Fund so you can compare these cost with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
Understanding your fund expenses
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs:
• Transaction costs which include sales charges (loads) on purchases or redemptions (if applicable), minimum account fee charge, etc.
• Ongoing operating expenses including management fees, distribution and service fees (if applicable), and other fund expenses.
We are going to present only your ongoing operating expenses here.
Actual expenses/actual returns
This example is intended to provide information about your fund’s actual ongoing operating expenses, and is based on your fund’s actual return. It assumes an account value of $1,000.00 on January 1, 2012 with the same investment held until June 30, 2012.
| | | |
| Account value | Ending value | Expenses paid during |
| on 1-1-12 | on 6-30-12 | period ended 6-30-121 |
|
Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,001.80 | $0.30 |
|
Together with the value of your account, you may use this information to estimate the operating expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value at June 30, 2012, by $1,000.00, then multiply it by the “expenses paid” from the table above. For example, for an account value of $8,600.00, the operating expenses should be calculated as follows:
Example
[ My account value $8,600.00 / $1,000.00 = 8.6 ] x $[ “expenses paid” from table ] = My actual expenses
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
This table allows you to compare your fund’s ongoing operating expenses with those of any other fund. It provides an example of the Fund’s hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% annualized return before expenses (which is not your fund’s actual return). It assumes an account value of $1,000.00 on January 1, 2012, with the same investment held until June 30, 2012. Look in any other fund shareholder report to find its hypothetical example and you will be able to compare these expenses. Please remember that these hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
| | | |
| Account value | Ending value | Expenses paid during |
| on 1-1-12 | on 6-30-12 | period ended 6-30-121 |
|
Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,024.60 | $0.30 |
|
Remember, these examples do not include any transaction costs, therefore, these examples will not help you to determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. If transaction costs were included, your expenses would have been higher. See the prospectus for details regarding transaction costs.
1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio of 0.06%, for the Fund's shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Portfolio Summary
| | | |
Top 10 Issuers1 | Yield* | Percentage of Net Assets (50.4% |
| | | of Net Assets on 6-30-12) |
Federal Home Loan Bank | | |
| 07/02/12 to 06/10/13 | 0.205 to 0.300% | 6.0% |
Toyota Motor Credit Corp. | | |
| 10/09/12 to 04/19/13 | 0.310 to 0.667% | 5.5% |
American Honda Finance Corp. | | |
| 08/28/12 to 04/02/13 | 0.687 to 4.625% | 5.4% |
Westpac | | |
| 09/14/12 to 04/08/13 | 0.470 to 2.625% | 5.3% |
Old Line Funding LLC | | |
| 07/02/12 to 09/17/12 | 0.180 to 0.230% | 5.3% |
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. | | |
| 07/05/12 to 01/22/13 | 0.160 to 2.600% | 5.0% |
JPMorgan Chase & Company† | | |
| 10/01/12 to 01/25/13 | 0.600 to 5.375% | 4.9% |
General Electric Capital Corp. | | |
| 10/19/12 to 05/22/13 | 0.596 to 5.250% | 4.7% |
Wells Fargo & Company | | |
| 10/23/12 to 01/31/13 | 4.375 to 5.250% | 4.4% |
Barclays U.S. Funding LLC | | |
| 07/02/12 | 0.050% | 3.9% |
| | |
Sector Composition1,2 | | |
Financials | 58.6% | |
Commercial Banks | 29.1% | |
Diversified Financial Services | 19.1% | |
Capital Markets | 6.2% | |
Consumer Finance | 4.2% | |
U.S. Government Agency Obligations | 12.2% | |
Consumer Discretionary | 7.7% | |
Industrials | 7.5% | |
Health Care | 6.0% | |
Materials | 3.9% | |
Asset Backed Securities | 2.1% | |
Consumer Staples | 1.8% | |
Foreign Government Obligations | 1.2% | |
Repurchase Agreement | 0.1% | |
Other | (1.1%) | |
| |
| |
Portfolio Composition1,2 | | |
Corporate Interest-Bearing Obligations | 46.2% | |
Commercial Paper | 32.1% | |
U.S. Government Agency Obligations | 12.2% | |
Certificates of Deposit | 7.2% | |
Asset Backed Securities | 2.1% | |
Foreign Government Obligations | 1.2% | |
Repurchase Agreement | 0.1% | |
Other | (1.1%) | |
1 As a percentage of net assets on 6-30-12.
2 Sector investing is subject to greater risks than the market as a whole. Because the Fund may focus on particular sectors of the economy, its performance may depend on the performance of those sectors.
* Yield represents the annualized yield at the date of purchase, the stated coupon rate or, for floating rate securities, the rate at period end.
† Includes securities issued under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation until the earlier of the maturity date or 6-30-12.
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
As of 6-30-12 (Unaudited)
Portfolio of Investments
| | | | |
| Maturity Date | Yield* (%) | Par value | Value |
| |
Asset Backed Securities 2.1% | | | $105,463,414 |
|
(Cost $105,408,329) | | | |
| | | |
Bank of America Auto Trust, Series 2012-1, Class A1 | | |
| 04/15/13 | 0.269 | $8,306,647 | 8,312,854 |
BMW Vehicle Lease Trust, Series 2012-1, Class A1 | | |
| 05/20/13 | 0.325 | 12,754,438 | 12,766,727 |
CNH Equipment Trust, Series 2011-C, Class A1 | | |
| 01/04/13 | 0.548 | 7,899,833 | 7,905,469 |
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust, Series 2011-3, Class | | |
A1 | | | |
| 10/22/12 | 0.398 | 79,093 | 79,124 |
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust, Series 2012-2, Class | | |
A1 | | | |
| 05/15/13 | 0.301 | 7,587,387 | 7,589,383 |
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2012-A, Class A1 | | |
| 03/15/13 | 0.300 | 23,678,866 | 23,697,850 |
Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust, Series 2011-B, Class | | |
A1 | | | |
| 11/15/12 | 0.408 | 5,747,055 | 5,748,304 |
Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust, Series 2012-A, Class | | |
A1 | | | |
| 03/15/13 | 0.359 | 39,355,010 | 39,363,703 |
| |
Commercial Paper 32.1% | | | $1,651,338,296 |
|
(Cost $1,651,338,296) | | | |
| | | |
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. | | | |
| 07/05/12 | 0.160 | 160,000,000 | 159,997,156 |
Barclays U.S. Funding LLC | | | |
| 07/02/12 | 0.050 | 200,000,000 | 199,999,722 |
BASF SE | | | |
| 09/04/12 | 0.230 | 100,000,000 | 99,958,472 |
Cafco LLC | | | |
| 07/02/12 to 07/03/12 | 0.400 to 0.420 | 160,775,000 | 160,772,248 |
Caisse Centrale Desjardins du Quebec | | | |
| 07/20/12 to 09/10/12 | 0.200 | 75,000,000 | 74,984,861 |
Chariot Funding LLC | | | |
| 07/27/12 | 0.170 | 50,000,000 | 49,993,861 |
Deutsche Bank Financial LLC | | | |
| 07/05/12 | 0.180 | 130,000,000 | 129,997,400 |
EI du Pont de Nemours & Company | | | |
| 07/02/12 to 07/23/12 | 0.170 to 0.180 | 80,000,000 | 79,996,633 |
JPMorgan Chase & Company | | | |
| 01/25/13 | 0.600 | 15,000,000 | 14,948,000 |
Jupiter Securitization Company LLC | | | |
| 07/05/12 to 07/27/12 | 0.170 to 0.230 | 115,000,000 | 114,992,936 |
Novartis FInancial Corp. | | | |
| 07/02/12 | 0.050 | 21,000,000 | 20,999,971 |
Old Line Funding LLC | | | |
| 07/02/12 to 09/17/12 | 0.180 to 0.230 | 273,010,000 | 272,935,295 |
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
As of 6-30-12 (Unaudited)
Portfolio of Investments
| | | | |
| Maturity Date | Yield* (%) | Par value | Value |
| | | | |
Commercial Paper (continued) | | | |
|
Sanofi | | | |
| 09/20/12 | 0.190 | $50,000,000 | $49,978,625 |
Sigma-Aldrich Corp. | | | |
| 07/02/12 | 0.120 | 11,000,000 | 10,999,963 |
State Street Corp. | | | |
| 07/17/12 | 0.300 | 75,000,000 | 74,990,000 |
Toyota Motor Credit Corp. | | | |
| 10/09/12 to 01/18/13 | 0.310 to 0.520 | 66,000,000 | 65,892,111 |
Unilever Capital Corp. | | | |
| 01/17/13 | 0.450 | 20,000,000 | 19,950,000 |
Westpac Securities NZ, Ltd. | | | |
| 09/14/12 | 0.470 | 50,000,000 | 49,951,042 |
| |
Corporate Interest-Bearing Obligations 46.2% | | $2,375,097,131 |
|
(Cost $2,375,115,953) | | | |
| | | |
American Honda Finance Corp.(P)(S) | | | |
| 08/28/12 to 12/07/12 | 0.687 to 0.836 | 240,650,000 | 240,869,857 |
American Honda Finance Corp. (S) | | | |
| 04/02/13 | 4.625 | 35,000,000 | 36,063,020 |
ANZ National International, Ltd. (S) | | | |
| 12/21/12 | 2.375 | 68,046,000 | 68,505,719 |
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, Ltd. (P)(S) | | |
| 07/09/12 | 0.669 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,013 |
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (S) | | | |
| 01/22/13 | 2.600 | 93,840,000 | 94,551,964 |
BHP Billiton Finance USA, Ltd. | | | |
| 04/15/13 | 4.800 | 8,576,000 | 8,861,152 |
Bottling Group LLC | | | |
| 11/15/12 | 4.625 | 3,000,000 | 3,043,845 |
Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. (P) | | | |
| 07/24/12 | 0.697 | 12,000,000 | 12,003,840 |
Caterpillar, Inc.(P) | | | |
| 11/21/12 to 05/21/13 | 0.567 to 0.637 | 101,305,000 | 101,522,221 |
Credit Suisse New York | | | |
| 05/15/13 | 5.000 | 67,817,000 | 69,934,518 |
General Electric Capital Corp.(P) | | | |
| 11/01/12 to 05/22/13 | 0.596 to 1.367 | 133,723,000 | 133,913,598 |
General Electric Capital Corp. | | | |
| 10/19/12 to 05/01/13 | 2.800 to 5.250 | 106,121,000 | 107,703,049 |
John Deere Capital Corp. | | | |
| 10/01/12 to 04/03/13 | 4.500 to 5.250 | 29,520,000 | 30,051,241 |
Johnson & Johnson (P) | | | |
| 05/15/13 | 0.467 | 140,000,000 | 140,326,760 |
Johnson & Johnson | | | |
| 08/15/12 | 5.150 | 3,500,000 | 3,519,247 |
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
As of 6-30-12 (Unaudited)
Portfolio of Investments
| | | | |
| Maturity Date | Yield* (%) | Par value | Value |
| |
Corporate Interest-Bearing Obligations (continued) | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Company | | | |
| 10/01/12 | 5.375 | $207,857,000 | $210,309,713 |
National Australia Bank, Ltd. (P)(S) | | | |
| 01/08/13 | 0.941 | 44,350,000 | 44,400,958 |
National Australia Bank, Ltd.(S) | | | |
| 11/16/12 to 01/08/13 | 2.350 to 2.500 | 7,950,000 | 8,020,114 |
PepsiCo, Inc. (P) | | | |
| 05/10/13 | 0.546 | 58,600,000 | 58,728,334 |
Rabobank Nederland NV (P)(S) | | | |
| 02/04/13 | 0.616 | 13,000,000 | 12,997,725 |
Rabobank Nederland NV (S) | | | |
| 08/17/12 | 2.650 | 56,710,000 | 56,823,477 |
Rabobank Nederland NV | | | |
| 09/18/12 | 3.000 | 11,985,000 | 12,036,775 |
Sanofi (P) | | | |
| 03/28/13 | 0.661 | 94,125,000 | 94,396,268 |
Target Corp. (P) | | | |
| 01/11/13 | 0.499 | 55,805,000 | 55,852,825 |
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. | | | |
| 11/01/12 | 4.950 | 42,555,000 | 43,195,580 |
The Boeing Company | | | |
| 11/20/12 | 1.875 | 1,290,000 | 1,296,507 |
The Procter & Gamble Company (P) | | | |
| 11/14/12 | 0.507 | 9,525,000 | 9,537,116 |
Toyota Motor Credit Corp.(P) | | | |
| 10/18/12 to 04/19/13 | 0.664 to 0.667 | 216,500,000 | 216,566,899 |
US Bank NA (P) | | | |
| 10/26/12 | 0.686 | 10,895,000 | 10,908,237 |
Wachovia Corp. (P) | | | |
| 05/01/13 | 2.236 | 19,260,000 | 19,537,556 |
Wachovia Corp. | | | |
| 05/01/13 | 5.500 | 34,733,000 | 36,090,331 |
Wells Fargo & Company | | | |
| 10/23/12 to 01/31/13 | 4.375 to 5.250 | 219,537,000 | 223,910,793 |
Westpac Banking Corp.(P)(S) | | | |
| 11/26/12 to 04/08/13 | 0.667 to 1.011 | 129,030,000 | 129,282,275 |
Westpac Banking Corp. | | | |
| 11/19/12 | 2.250 | 56,710,000 | 57,087,972 |
Westpac Securities NZ, Ltd. (S) | | | |
| 01/28/13 | 2.625 | 22,000,000 | 22,247,632 |
| |
U.S. Government & Agency Obligations 12.2% | | $625,794,961 |
|
(Cost $625,708,738) | | | |
| | | |
Citibank NA (J)(P) | | | |
| 11/15/12 | 0.467 | 55,000,000 | 55,058,025 |
Federal Farm Credit Bank(P) | | | |
| 06/11/13 to 07/02/13 | 0.190 to 0.200 | 185,000,000 | 184,989,375 |
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
As of 6-30-12 (Unaudited)
Portfolio of Investments
| | | | |
| Maturity Date | Yield* (%) | Par value | Value |
| |
U.S. Government & Agency Obligations (continued) | | |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank(P) | | | |
| 07/02/12 to 04/30/13 | 0.205 to 0.210 | $205,000,000 | $204,983,400 |
Federal Home Loan Bank | | | |
| 06/10/13 | 0.280 to 0.300 | 105,400,000 | 105,381,784 |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.(P) | | | |
| 10/12/12 to 01/10/13 | 0.300 to 0.350 | 50,280,000 | 50,312,802 |
JPMorgan Chase & Company (J)(P) | | | |
| 12/26/12 | 0.712 | 25,000,000 | 25,069,575 |
| |
Foreign Government Obligations 1.2% | | | $61,720,506 |
|
(Cost $61,720,621) | | | |
| | | |
Province of Ontario, Canada | | | |
| 07/17/12 to 11/19/12 | 1.875 to 5.125 | 61,430,000 | 61,720,506 |
| |
Certificates of Deposit 7.2% | | | $369,849,344 |
|
(Cost $369,849,344) | | | |
| | | |
Bank of Nova Scotia (P) | | | |
| 08/22/12 to 10/18/12 | 0.315 to 0.766 | 36,370,000 | 36,383,326 |
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (P) | | | |
| 07/17/12 to 09/04/12 | 0.666 to 0.667 | 78,450,000 | 78,466,018 |
National Australia Bank, Ltd. (P) | | | |
| 10/09/12 to 12/06/12 | 0.295 to 0.627 | 45,000,000 | 45,000,000 |
Royal Bank of Canada | | | |
| 07/02/12 | 0.125 | 145,000,000 | 145,000,000 |
Royal Bank of Canada (P) | | | |
| 06/13/13 | 0.560 | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 |
Westpac Banking Corp. (P) | | | |
| 10/24/12 | 0.526 | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 |
| |
| | | Par value | Value |
| | | | |
Repurchase Agreement 0.1% | | | $2,800,000 |
|
(Cost $2,800,000) | | | |
| |
Repurchase Agreement with State Street Corp. dated 6-30-12 at | | |
0.010% to be repurchased at $2,800,002 on 7-2-12, collateralized | | |
by $2,825,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.875% due 12-31-16 (valued | | |
at $2,860,245, including interest) | | $2,800,000 | 2,800,000 |
| |
Total investments (Cost $5,191,941,281)† 101.1% | | $5,192,063,652 |
|
Other assets and liabilities, net (1.1%) | | | ($55,789,958) |
|
Total net assets 100.0% | | $5,136,273,694 |
|
The percentage shown for each investment category is the total value of that category as a percentage of the net assets of the Fund.
* Yield represents either the annualized yield at the date of purchase, the stated coupon rate or, for floating rate securities, the rate at period end.
(J) These securities are issued under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation until the earlier of the maturity date or 6-30-12.
(P) Variable rate obligation. The coupon rate shown represents the rate at period end.
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
As of 6-30-12 (Unaudited)
Portfolio of Investments
(S) These securities are exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. Such securities may be resold, normally to qualified institutional buyers, in transactions exempt from registration. Rule 144A securities amounted to $714,762,754 or 13.9% of the Fund's net assets as of 6-30-12.
† At 6-30-12, the aggregate cost of investment securities for federal income tax purposes was $5,191,941,281. Net unrealized appreciation aggregated $122,371, of which $732,747 related to appreciated investment securities and $610,376 related to depreciated investment securities.
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
Statement of Assets and Liabilities — June 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | |
Assets | | |
| |
Investments, at value (Cost $5,191,941,281) | $5,192,063,652 | |
Cash | 96,277 | |
Interest receivable | 14,060,292 | |
Other receivables and prepaid expenses | 20,959 | |
| | |
Total assets | 5,206,241,180 | |
| | |
| |
Liabilities | | |
| |
Payable for investments purchased | 68,184,413 | |
Distributions payable | 1,583,228 | |
Payable to affiliates | | |
Chief compliance officer fees | 8,758 | |
Transfer agent fees | 16,618 | |
Trustees' fees | 27,426 | |
Other liabilities and accrued expenses | 147,043 | |
| | |
Total liabilities | 69,967,486 | |
| | |
| |
Net assets | | |
| |
Paid-in capital | $5,136,364,944 | |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net | | |
investment income | (239,698) | |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on | | |
investments | 26,077 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on | | |
investments | 122,371 | |
| | |
Net assets | $5,136,273,694 | |
| | |
| |
Net asset value per share | | |
| |
Based on 513,249,387 shares of beneficial | | |
interest outstanding — unlimited number of | | |
shares authorized with no par value | $10.01 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
Statement of Operations — For the six month period ended June 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | |
Investment income | | |
| |
Interest | $11,062,349 | |
| | |
Expenses | | |
| |
Investment management fees | 944,365 | |
Administrative services fees | 149,199 | |
Transfer agent fees | 49,656 | |
Trustees' fees | 55,446 | |
Professional fees | 74,346 | |
Custodian fees | 208,852 | |
Chief compliance officer fees | 17,405 | |
Other | 36,702 | |
| | |
Total expenses | 1,535,971 | |
| |
Net investment income | 9,526,378 | |
| | |
| |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | |
| |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 875 | |
| | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation | | |
(depreciation) on investments | 272,867 | |
| |
| |
Net realized and unrealized gain | 273,742 | |
| |
Increase in net assets from operations | $9,800,120 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | |
| Six months | | |
| ended | Year ended | |
| 6/30/12 | 12/31/11 | |
| (Unaudited) | | |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | | | |
| |
From operations | | | |
Net investment income | $9,526,378 | $16,762,044 | |
Net realized gain | 875 | 302,933 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation | | | |
(depreciation) | 272,867 | (1,026) | |
| | | |
Increase in net assets resulting from | | | |
operations | 9,800,120 | 17,063,951 | |
| |
Distributions to shareholders | | | |
From net investment income | (9,525,847) | (16,769,079) | |
| |
From net realized gain | — | (218,792) | |
Total distributions | (9,525,847) | (16,987,871) | |
| | | |
From Fund share transactions | (2,932,513) | (1,616,723,875) | |
| |
Total decrease | (2,658,240) | (1,616,647,795) | |
| | | |
Net assets | | | |
| |
Beginning of period | 5,138,931,934 | 6,755,579,729 | |
End of period | $5,136,273,694 | $5,138,931,934 | |
| | | |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net | | | |
investment income | ($239,698) | ($240,229) | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
Financial Highlights (For a share outstanding throughout the period)
| | | | | | | | |
Period ended | | | | | | | | |
| | 6-30-121 | | 12-31-11 | | 12-31-10 | | 12-31-092 |
Per share operating performance | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $10.01 | | $10.01 | | $10.01 | | $10.00 |
Net investment income3 | | 0.02 | | 0.03 | | 0.03 | | 0.02 |
Net realized and unrealized gain on | | | | | | | | |
investments | | — 4 | | — 4 | | — 5 | | 0.01 |
Total from investment operations | | 0.02 | | 0.03 | | 0.03 | | 0.03 |
|
Less distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | (0.02) | | (0.03) | | (0.03) | | (0.02) |
From net realized gain | | — | | — 5 | | — | | — |
Total distributions | | (0.02) | | (0.03) | | (0.03) | | (0.02) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $10.01 | | $10.01 | | $10.01 | | $10.01 |
|
Total return (%) | | 0.186 | | 0.28 | | 0.27 | | 0.296 |
|
Ratios and supplemental data | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net assets, end of period (in millions) | | $5,136 | | $5,139 | | $6,756 | | $4,901 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average net | | | | | | | | |
assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses | | 0.067 | | 0.05 | | 0.06 | | 0.097 |
Net investment income | | 0.367 | | 0.27 | | 0.27 | | 0.297 |
Portfolio turnover (%)8 | | 62 | | 91 | | 153 | | 51 |
1 Six months ended 6-30-12. Unaudited.
2 Period from 6-1-09 (inception date) to 12-31-09.
3 Based on the average daily shares outstanding.
4 Less than $0.005 per share.
5 Less than ($0.005) per share.
6 Not annualized.
7 Annualized.
8 The calculation of portfolio turnover excludes amounts from all securities whose maturities or expiration dates at the time of acquisition were one year or less, which represents a significant amount of the investments held by the Fund.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust
Notes to financial statements (unaudited)
Note 1 - Organization
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust (the Fund) is a Massachusetts business trust organized on May 19, 2009. The Fund is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). Most of the current investors in the Fund are investment companies advised by affiliates of Manulife Asset Management (US) LLC (the Adviser). The Fund serves primarily as an investment vehicle for cash received as collateral by such affiliated funds for participation in securities lending.
The investment objective of the Fund is to seek current income, while maintaining adequate liquidity, safeguarding the return of principal and minimizing risk of default. The Fund invests only in U.S. dollar denominated securities rated, at the time of investment, within the two highest short-term credit categories and their unrated equivalents. The Fund’s net asset value (NAV) varies daily.
Note 2 - Significant accounting policies
The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Events or transactions occurring after the end of the fiscal period through the date that the financial statements were issued have been evaluated in the preparation of the financial statements. The following summarizes the significant accounting policies of the Fund:
Security valuation. Investments are stated at value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally at 4:00 P.M., Eastern Time. In order to value the securities, the Fund uses the following valuation techniques. Debt obligations are valued based on the evaluated prices provided by an independent pricing service, which utilizes both dealer-supplied and electronic data processing techniques, taking into account factors such as institutional-size trading in similar groups of securities, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other market data. Certain securities traded only in the over-the-counter market are valued at the last bid price quoted by brokers making markets in the securities at the close of trading. Certain short-term securities are valued at amortized cost. Other portfolio securities and assets, where market quotations are not readily available, are valued at fair value, as determined in good faith by the Fund’s Pricing Committee, following procedures established by the Board of Trustees.
The Fund uses a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the pricing assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. Level 1 includes securities valued using quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 includes securities valued using significant observable inputs. Observable inputs may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit risk. Prices for securities valued using these inputs are received from independent pricing vendors and brokers and are based on an evaluation of the inputs described. Level 3 includes securities valued using significant unobservable inputs when market prices are not readily available or reliable, including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Factors used in determining value may include market or issuer specific events, changes in interest rates and credit quality. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. As of June 30, 2012, all investments are categorized as Level 2 under the hierarchy described above. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy.
Security transactions and related investment income. Investment security transactions are accounted for on a trade date plus one basis for daily net asset value calculations. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are reported on trade date. Interest income is accrued as earned. Interest income includes coupon interest and amortization/accretion of premiums/discounts on debt securities. Debt obligations may be placed in a non-accrual status and related interest income may be reduced by stopping current accruals and writing off interest receivable when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Gains and losses on securities sold are determined on the basis of identified cost and may include proceeds from litigation
Expenses. Expense estimates are accrued in the period to which they relate and adjustments are made when actual amounts are known.
Federal income taxes. The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is distributed to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required.
As of December 31, 2011, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, derecognition or disclosure. The Fund’s federal tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a period of three years.
Distribution of income and gains. Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-date. The Fund generally declares dividends daily and pays them monthly. Capital gain distributions, net of fees paid to the Fund security lending agent, if any, are distributed annually.
Such distributions, on a tax basis, are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Capital accounts within the financial statements are adjusted for permanent book-tax differences. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or the results of operations. Temporary book-tax differences, if any, will reverse in a subsequent period.
Note 3 - Guarantees and indemnifications
Under the Fund’s organizational documents, its Officers and Trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with service providers that contain general indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Note 4 - Fees and transactions with affiliates
Manulife Asset Management (US) LLC (the Adviser) serves as investment adviser for the Fund. John Hancock Funds, LLC (the Placement Agent) performs services related to the offering and sale of shares of the Fund. The Adviser and the Placement Agent are indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Manulife Financial Corporation.
Management fee. The Fund has an investment management contract with the Adviser. Under the investment management contract, the Fund pays a daily management fee to the Adviser at the annual rate of: (a) 0.05% of the first $1,500,000,000 of the Fund’s average daily net assets and (b) 0.03% of the Fund’s average daily net assets in excess of $1,500,000,000.
The investment management fees incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.036% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Administrative services. The Fund entered into an Administrative Services Agreement with John Hancock Advisers, LLC (JHA), an affiliate of the Adviser, under which JHA provides accounting, valuation, financial reporting and certain other services. The Fund pays such affiliate monthly in arrears for these services at an annual rate of 0.02% of the Fund’s average daily net assets, up to a maximum of $300,000 annually. The administrative service fees incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.006% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Chief Compliance Officer services. The Fund has contracted with the Adviser and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) to provide certain services, including on-going evaluation of the Fund’s policies and procedures under the Federal Securities Law. In addition, the CCO will provide annual reporting to the Board of Trustees detailing the results of this review. The Fund pays an annual flat rate of $35,000 to the Adviser, paid monthly in arrears, for these services.
Trustee expenses. The Fund compensates each Trustee who is not an employee of the Adviser or its affiliates.
Transfer agent fees. The Fund has a transfer agent agreement with John Hancock Signature Services, Inc. (Transfer Agent), an affiliate of the Adviser. The Fund pays the Transfer Agent monthly a fee which is based on an annual rate of $100,000. The Fund also pays certain out-of-pocket expenses.
Note 5 - Fund share transactions
Transactions in Fund shares for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 were as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| Six months ended | | Year ended |
| 6/30/12 | | 12/31/11 |
|
| |
|
| Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount |
Common shares | | | | | | | |
Sold | 1,842,872,598 | | $18,443,625,144 | | 3,947,565,032 | | $39,502,092,386 |
Repurchased | (1,843,169,444) | | (18,446,557,657) | | (4,109,108,537) | | (41,118,816,261) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
Net decrease | (296,846) | | ($2,932,513) | | (161,543,505) | | ($1,616,723,875) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
Note 6 - Purchase and sale of securities
Purchases and proceeds from sales or maturities of securities, other than short-term securities, during the six months ended June 30, 2012, aggregated $1,308,908,878 and $1,452,593,318 respectively.
Evaluation of the Investment Management Contract by the Board of Trustees
This section describes the evaluation by the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust (the “Trust”), including the Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“Independent Trustees”), of the Investment Management Contract (the “Management Contract”) between the Trust and Manulife Asset Management (US), LLC (the “Adviser”) that took place at an in-person meeting of the Board of Trustees on February 22, 2012 (the “Meeting”). In considering the continuance of the Management Contract, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, considered the following factors:
The Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided by the Adviser
The Board considered the high value to the Trust of its relationship with the Adviser, in particular noting the Adviser’s strong reputation in the asset management industry and the skills and competency with which the Adviser has managed the affairs of the Trust and other affiliated funds, together with the Adviser’s investment philosophy, research and investment decision-making process. The Board also particularly noted the experience and performance of the Adviser in managing the Trust, the qualifications of the Adviser’s personnel, the commitment of the Adviser and its personnel to the Trust’s continued successful operation and management and the Adviser’s ability to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
Additionally, the Board considered the Adviser’s compliance policies and procedures and the Adviser’s record of compliance with those policies and procedures, noting in particular the Adviser’s dedication to its compliance program, the lack of any material compliance incidents and the Adviser’s strong culture of compliance. The Board also considered the Adviser’s administrative capabilities and its demonstrated ability to supervise other service providers for the Trust and to draw upon its many and varied organizational resources and affiliated companies to enhance the services it provides to the Trust.
Advisory Fees, Expenses and Investment Performance of the Trust
The Board considered and received information regarding the advisory fees charged by the Adviser and the other expenses borne by the Trust, including administrative fees, transfer agent fees, custodial fees and other miscellaneous fees and expenses. The Board also considered and received information regarding the Trust’s investment performance for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Board then reviewed and considered comparative advisory fee and performance information for a peer group of other funds that, like the Trust, are vehicles for the investment of cash collateral from securities lending programs (the “Peer Group”). The Board noted that no members of the Peer Group operated in a manner exactly like the Trust – i.e., as a 1940 Act-registered fund investing in money market instruments and maintaining a floating net asset value – but that the members of the Peer Group were sufficiently comparable to the Trust for a meaningful analysis.
The Board noted that the Adviser charged the Trust an advisory fee of 0.05% of the Trust’s first $1.5 billion of average daily net assets and 0.03% of the Trust’s average daily net assets in excess of $1.5 billion. The Board recognized that, for the year ended December 31, 2011, this resulted in an effective advisory fee rate of 0.035% of the Trust’s average daily net assets. The Board compared this effective advisory fee rate to the Peer Group, and noted that it was on the low end of the advisory fee rates of the Peer Group, which ranged from 0.018% to 0.16% of net assets. The Board then further noted that the Trust’s average net yield as of December 2011 was 0.37%, which was the highest of the Peer Group, whose average net yields ranged from 0.12% to 0.37% for the same period. There was then a discussion of the fees charged by the Adviser to other non-investment company clients for similar services. It was noted that the fees charged to the Trust compared favorably to the fees charged to such other clients.
Upon reviewing and considering the foregoing information and considering the overall expenses and performance of the Trust over various periods and since its inception, the Board concluded that the Adviser’s performance was exemplary, and in particular noted the fact that the Trust achieved a high net yield relative to the Peer Group while the Adviser maintained a low rate of compensation relative to the Peer Group.
Economies of Scale
The Board received and considered general information regarding economies of scale with respect to the management of the Trust, including the Trust’s ability to appropriately benefit from economies of scale under the Trust’s fee structure, which included a breakpoint at $1.5 billion average daily net assets. The Board recognized the inherent limitations of any analysis of economies of scale, stemming largely from the Board’s understanding that most of the Adviser’s costs are not specific to individual funds, but rather are incurred across a variety of products and services and would generally stem from the Adviser’s common corporate ownership or shared services. To the extent the Board and the Adviser were able to identify actual or potential economies of scale, in order to ensure that any such economies continue to be reasonably shared with the Trust as its assets increase, the Adviser and the Board agreed to continue the existing breakpoints to the advisory fee rate.
Financial Condition and Profitability of, and Other Benefits to, the Adviser
The Board next received and considered information regarding the Adviser’s estimated net profit margin attributable to its management of the Trust, and noted that the Trust’s affiliated service providers (other than the Adviser) were providing their services based upon estimated costs or for a nominal fee and such affiliated service providers, where applicable, reflected economies of scale in such fees. The Board also considered the Adviser’s views as to its projected profitability in connection with its relationship with the Trust in terms of the total amount of annual management fees it is projected to received with respect to the Trust and whether the Adviser has the financial ability to provide a high level of services to the Trust. The Board further considered the Adviser’s unaudited balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 and noted the Adviser’s strong capitalization and financial condition and considered favorably the Adviser’s representation that it sought to reinvest profits and retained earnings in its business.
The Board also received and considered information regarding any additional, indirect or “fall out” benefits to the Adviser as a result of its management of the Trust. The Board noted in particular that the Trust invests in fixed-income money market securities, which are generally traded in an over-the-counter market and are generally purchased from the issuer or a primary market maker acting as principal on a net basis with no stated brokerage commission paid by the Trust. The Board recognized that, in these markets, any commission or net markup (or markdown) was implied by the difference or “spread” between the price the dealer purchases the bond for and the price the dealer sells the bond at. In this regard, the Board considered the quality of the execution achieved for the Trust by the Adviser and noted its satisfaction with the Adviser’s performance.
Additionally, the Board considered the Adviser’s representations regarding the receipt of research and other brokerage services from broker-dealers in connection with trades made for the Trust and noted the Adviser’s representation that, due to the nature of the Trust’s investments, the Adviser does not generate soft dollars in connection with trades made for the Trust’s account. The Board noted, however, that the Adviser does generate soft dollars in the management of other accounts and that the Adviser does receive proprietary broker research as part of the “bundle” of brokerage and research services in which the research is not separately priced. The Board recognized that research and brokerage services provided in connection with one account may be used to benefit all of the Adviser’s and its affiliates’ accounts and noted again its satisfaction with the quality of execution achieved for the Trust by the Adviser.
The Board also considered the various other service agreements that the Trust has with the Adviser’s affiliates, including an Administrative Services Agreement (for administrative services),
a Placement Agency Agreement, a Transfer Agency and Service Agreement, a Chief Compliance Officer Services Agreement and an Information Technology Support Services Agreement. The Board reviewed and considered the terms of each of these agreements and the services provided thereunder, together with the fees charged under these agreements. After reviewing these service arrangements, the Board concluded that each such service agreement was in the best interests of the Trust and its shareholders, that the services performed pursuant to each such service agreement are required for the operation of the Trust, that each such service provider provides services the nature and quality of which are at least equal to those provided by other unaffiliated service providers offering the same or similar services, and that the fees charged under each such service agreement are fair and reasonable in light of the usual and customary charges made by other unaffiliated service providers for services of the same nature and quality.
The Board then concluded that, in light of the costs of providing investment management and other services to the Trust, the profits and other ancillary benefits reported by the Adviser were not unreasonable.
Other Considerations and Conclusion
The Board also generally took into account the level and quality of services that the Adviser is capable of providing, as well as the other factors considered, including all of the information presented at the previous Board meetings.
As a result of the above considerations and discussion with management of the Adviser during the Meeting, the Board, though it did not identify any one factor as controlling, concluded that: (i) the Adviser may reasonably be expected to perform its services under the Management Contract; (ii) although economies of scale cannot be measured with precision, the management fee breakpoint currently allows shareholders to benefit from economies of scale; and (iii) the Trust’s management fees are generally within a competitive range of those incurred by other comparable funds.
More information
| |
Trustees | Investment adviser |
Harlan D. Platt* | Manulife Asset Management (US) LLC |
John A. Frabotta* | |
Frank Saeli† | |
*Member of the Audit Committee | Placement agent |
†Non-Independent Trustee | John Hancock Funds, LLC |
|
Officers | Custodian |
Barry H. Evans | State Street Bank and Trust Company |
President and Chief Executive Officer | |
Carolyn M. Flanagan | Transfer agent |
Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | John Hancock Signature Services, Inc. |
William E. Corson | |
Chief Compliance Officer | Legal counsel |
Charles A. Rizzo | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP |
Chief Financial Officer | |
Michael J. Leary | |
Treasurer | |
|
| |
| The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, |
| which requires mutual funds and other public companies |
| to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information |
| in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in |
| all material respects. |
|
| |
The Fund's proxy voting policies and procedures are available upon request.
The Fund’s complete list of portfolio holdings, for the first and third fiscal quarters, is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q.
The Fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov, and can be reviewed and copied (for a fee) at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Call 1-800-SEC-0330 to receive information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
Not applicable at this time.
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
Not applicable at this time.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Not applicable at this time.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
Not applicable at this time.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
(a) Not applicable.
(b) Not applicable.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
The registrant has adopted procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant's Board of Trustees. A copy of the procedures is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. See attached “John Hancock Funds – Nominating, Governance and Administration Committee Charter”.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Based upon their evaluation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR, the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.
(b) There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal half-year (the registrant's second fiscal half-year in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.
(a) Separate certifications for the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.
(b) Separate certifications for the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached. The certifications furnished pursuant to this paragraph are not deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certifications are not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates them by reference.
(c)(1) Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders is attached. See attached “John Hancock Funds – Nominating, Governance and Administration Committee Charter”.
(c)(2) Contact person at the registrant.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| |
John Hancock Collateral Investment Trust |
|
By: | /s/ Barry H. Evans |
| ------------------------------ |
| Barry H. Evans |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date: | August 20, 2012 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| |
By: | /s/ Barry H. Evans |
| ------------------------------- |
| Barry H. Evans |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date: | August 20, 2012 |
|
|
By: | /s/ Charles A. Rizzo |
| ------------------------------- |
| Charles A. Rizzo |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: | August 20, 2012 |