UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2017
Or
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________to ________
Commission File Number: 000-53943
SOUPMAN, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Delaware | | 61-1638630 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1110 South Avenue, Suite 100
Staten Island, New York 10314
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 768-7687
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
____________________________________________________________
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated file, a non-accelerated file, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | |
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | þ |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Emerging growth company | ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of May 4, 2017, is 288,845,379.
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Current Assets | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 23,181 | | | $ | 1,424,544 | |
Accounts receivable – net | | | 454,362 | | | | 321,347 | |
Inventory | | | 771,592 | | | | 286,804 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 38,471 | | | | 108,693 | |
Total Current Assets | | | 1,287,606 | | | | 2,141,388 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment – net | | | 3,035 | | | | 4,423 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Due from franchisees | | | 60,628 | | | | 52,951 | |
Other | | | 20,161 | | | | 20,161 | |
Total Other Assets | | | 80,789 | | | | 73,112 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 1,371,430 | | | $ | 2,218,923 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | 4,646,250 | | | $ | 3,990,306 | |
Current portion of convertible debt - net of discount ($0 and $320) | | | 106,000 | | | | 130,680 | |
Demand debt - net of discount ($4,764 and $4,731) | | | 3,654,654 | | | | 3,701,496 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 133,012 | | | | 157,513 | |
Derivative liabilities | | | 2,103,071 | | | | 3,311,580 | |
Total Current Liabilities | | | 10,642,987 | | | | 11,291,575 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long Term Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Convertible debt - net of discount ($2,200,855 and $3,173,333) | | | 1,279,145 | | | | 186,667 | |
Total Long Term Liabilities | | | 1,279,145 | | | | 186,667 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 11,922,132 | | | | 11,478,242 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' Deficit | | | | | | | | |
Series A convertible preferred stock, par value $0.001; 2,500,000 shares authorized, | | | | | | | | |
878,639 and 878,639 issued and outstanding | | | 879 | | | | 879 | |
Series B convertible preferred stock, par value $0.001; 45,000,000 shares authorized, | | | | | | | | |
8,204,419 and 10,431,516 issued and outstanding | | | 8,204 | | | | 10,431 | |
Series C convertible preferred stock, par value $0.001; 2,500,000 shares authorized, | | | | | | | | |
1,725,000 and 1,725,000 issued and outstanding | | | 1,725 | | | | 1,725 | |
Series D convertible preferred stock, par value $0.001; 672 shares authorized, | | | | | | | | |
672 and 672 issued and outstanding | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Common stock, par value $0.001; 500,000,000 shares authorized | | | | | | | | |
261,388,744 and 221,904,924 issued and outstanding | | | 261,388 | | | | 221,905 | |
Additional paid in capital | | | 22,629,014 | | | | 22,298,089 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (32,776,726 | ) | | | (31,118,452 | ) |
Total Stockholders' Deficit | | | (9,875,515 | ) | | | (8,585,422 | ) |
Noncontrolling interest | | | (675,187 | ) | | | (673,897 | ) |
Total Deficit | | | (10,550,702 | ) | | | (9,259,319 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit | | $ | $1,371,430 | | | $ | 2,218,923 | |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
1
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended February 28, | | | Six Months Ended February 28, | |
| | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2017 | | | 2016 | |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Soup sales – net | | $ | 782,059 | | | $ | 779,842 | | | $ | 1,792,724 | | | $ | 1,352,139 | |
Franchise sales – net | | | — | | | | 104,819 | | | | — | | | | 206,250 | |
Franchise royalties | | | 45,750 | | | | 47,476 | | | | 84,251 | | | | 95,410 | |
Total revenue | | | 827,809 | | | | 932,137 | | | | 1,876,975 | | | | 1,653,799 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | | 608,828 | | | | 831,777 | | | | 1,407,544 | | | | 1,229,127 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 218,981 | | | | 100,360 | | | | 469,431 | | | | 424,672 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
General and administrative | | | 1,155,676 | | | | 942,602 | | | | 2,242,601 | | | | 1,635,824 | |
Royalty | | | 29,843 | | | | 28,913 | | | | 66,663 | | | | 47,162 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 1,185,519 | | | | 971,515 | | | | 2,309,264 | | | | 1,682,986 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from operations | | | (966,538 | ) | | | (871,155) | | | | (1,839,833 | ) | | | (1,258,314 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | (714,376 | ) | | | (24,036 | ) | | | (1,389,150 | ) | | | (124,696 | ) |
Gain (loss) on settlement of debt | | | — | | | | 48,112 | | | | 61,939 | | | | (227,130 | ) |
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | | | 510,364 | | | | 56,714 | | | | 1,507,480 | | | | 179,361 | |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | — | | | | (654,913 | ) | | | — | | | | (654,913 | ) |
Total other income (expense) | | | (204,012 | ) | | | (574,123) | | | | 180,269 | | | | (827,378) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss including non-controlling interest | | | (1,170,550 | ) | | | (1,445,278 | ) | | | (1,659,564 | ) | | | (2,085,692 | ) |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | 2,367 | | | | 30,229 | | | | (1,290 | ) | | | 55,431 | |
Net loss attributable to Soupman | | | (1,172,917 | ) | | | (1,475,507 | ) | | | (1,658,274 | ) | | | (2,141,123 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deemed dividend on preferred stock | | | — | | | | (3,280,151 | ) | | | — | | | | (3,280,151 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (1,172,917 | ) | | $ | (4,755,658 | ) | | $ | (1,658,274 | ) | | $ | (5,421,274 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per share, basic | | $ | (0.00 | ) | | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (0.07 | ) |
Net loss per share, diluted | | $ | (0.00 | ) | | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (0.07 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic | | | 252,389,321 | | | | 75,111,600 | | | | 241,683,446 | | | | 73,694,560 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted | | | 252,389,321 | | | | 75,111,600 | | | | 241,683,446 | | | | 73,694,560 | |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
2
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended February 28, | |
| | 2017 | | | 2016 | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (1,659,564 | ) | | $ | (2,085,692 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 1,388 | | | | 2,367 | |
Amortization of intangibles | | | — | | | | 1,577 | |
Amortization of debt discount | | | 996,137 | | | | — | |
Bad debt expense | | | — | | | | 1,196 | |
Stock based compensation | | | | | | | 212,958 | |
Common and Series B preferred stock issued for services | | | 309,851 | | | | 50,853 | |
Common stock issued for inducement to settle debt | | | — | | | | 120,000 | |
Excess of fair market value of common stock over share issuance price to settle debt | | | — | | | | 520,163 | |
Excess of Fair market value of Series B preferred stock over share issuance price to settle debt | | | — | | | | 134,750 | |
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities | | | (1,507,480 | ) | | | (179,361 | ) |
Fair value of warrants issued for services | | | 286,094 | | | | — | |
(Gain) loss on settlement of debt and accrued liabilities | | | (61,939 | ) | | | 107,130 | |
Due from other | | | — | | | | (115,000 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
(Increase) decrease in: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | (133,015 | ) | | | (261,110 | ) |
Accounts receivable - related party | | | — | | | | (43,670 | ) |
Inventory | | | (484,788 | ) | | | 142,968 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 70,222 | | | | 15,267 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | 688,713 | | | | 145,951 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities - related parties | | | — | | | | 5,735 | |
Deferred franchising revenue | | | (24,501 | ) | | | 59,763 | |
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | | | (1,518,882 | ) | | | (1,164,155) | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Due from franchisee (Hanover, GCT and DNV food) | | | (7,677 | ) | | | (38,935 | ) |
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | | | (7,677 | ) | | | (38,935 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net proceeds from issuance of notes | | | 435,558 | | | | 70,000 | |
Proceeds from issuance of Series B preferred stock for cash | | | — | | | | 949,800 | |
Repayment of debt and accrued interest in cash | | | (310,362 | ) | | | (215,380 ) | |
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | | | 125,196 | | | | 804,420 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash | | | (1,401,363 | ) | | | (398,670 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash at beginning of year | | | 1,424,544 | | | | 611,354 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 23,181 | | | $ | 212,684 | |
(Continued)
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
3
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended February 28, | |
| | 2017 | | | 2016 | |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 62,979 | | | $ | — | |
Cash paid for taxes | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Debt and accrued interest converted to common stock | | $ | 17,900 | | | $ | — | |
Debt and accrued interest converted to Series B preferred stock | | $ | 102,369 | | | $ | 1,100,000 | |
Conversion of Series B preferred stock to common stock | | $ | 25,436 | | | $ | — | |
Debt converted to Series A preferred stock | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Reclassification of short term debt to long term debt | | $ | — | | | $ | 755,000 | |
Reclassification of accrued interest to debt | | $ | — | | | $ | 444,758 | |
Common stock issued as an inducement to settle debt | | $ | — | | | $ | 445,946 | |
Reclassification of accrued commissions to debt | | $ | — | | | $ | 12,500 | |
Conversion of Series B preferred stock Series C preferred stock | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,725 | |
Conversion of Series A preferred stock to common stock | | $ | — | | | $ | 3 | |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
4
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial reporting the instructions to Form 10-Q, and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they may not include all the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations or cash flows. It is management's opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. The results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2016, which contains the audited financial statements and notes thereto, together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, for the year ended August 31, 2016. The interim results for the period ended February 28, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of results for the full fiscal year.
Note 2 – Going Concern and Management Plans
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, for the six months ended February 28, 2017 the Company had a net loss including non-controlling interest of approximately $1.7 million, net cash used in operations of approximately $1.5 million, working capital deficit of approximately $9.4 million and a stockholders’ deficit of approximately $10.6 million. The aforementioned factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset amounts or the classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.
The ability of the Company to continue its operations is dependent on management's plans, which may include the raising of capital through equity markets with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. If management is unable to raise additional capital to support business operations within the immediately foreseeable future, the Company may be forced to pursue a strategy of reorganization or liquidation.
The Company will require additional funding to finance the growth of its current and expected future operations as well as to achieve its strategic objectives. The Company believes its current available cash along with anticipated revenues will be insufficient to meet its cash needs for the immediately foreseeable future. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. Therefore, if further financing is unavailable to the Company in the foreseeable future for any reason whatsoever, the Company may be forced to pursue a strategy of reorganization or liquidation.
In response to these problems, management has taken the following actions:
| |
· | seeking additional equity financing for operations, marketing and potential acquisitions |
· | seeking to increase sales and distribution of Tetra Pak products; |
· | allocating sufficient resources to continue advertising and marketing efforts |
Note 3 – Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company minimizes credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution(s). The balances did not exceed the federally insured limit. The Company has no cash equivalents.
5
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company recognizes an allowance for losses on accounts receivable in an amount equal to the estimated probable losses net of recoveries. The allowance is based on an analysis of historical bad debt experience, current receivables aging, and expected future write-offs, as well as an assessment of specific identifiable customer accounts considered at risk or uncollectible.
Inventory
Inventory consists of finished goods - soups and is stated at the lower of cost or market using the FIFO method of accounting. The Company does not have any work in progress or raw materials.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company measures assets and liabilities at fair value based on an expected exit price as defined by the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements, which represents the amount that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level.
The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:
| |
· | Level 1 – Observable inputs that reflect quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
· | Level 2 - Inputs reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
· | Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available. |
| | | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Derivative liabilities (balance) | | $ | 2,103,071 | | | $ | 3,311,580 | |
The Level 3 valuation relates to derivative liabilities measured using management's estimates of fair value as well as other significant inputs, such as volatility and risk free interest rate, which may be unobservable. See Note 3.
The Company has determined the estimated fair value amounts presented in these financial statements using available market information and appropriate methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The estimates presented in the financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Fair value estimates are based upon pertinent information available. The Company has determined that the carrying value of all financial instruments approximates fair value. The Company's financial instruments consist primarily of accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable including accrued liabilities and debt. The carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments generally approximated their fair values at February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
Reclassification
Certain accounts in the prior year's financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the presentation in the current year's financial statements. These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported earnings.
6
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
Recent Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605 - Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance throughout the ASC. The standard requires that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 should be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application. To allow entities additional time to implement systems, gather data and resolve implementation questions, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customer (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, in August 2015, to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for one year, which is fiscal years beginning after December I5, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its financial statements or disclosures. In addition, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08 in March 2016, to help provide interpretive clarifications on the new guidance in ASC Topic 606. The Company is currently evaluating the accounting transition, and disclosure requirements of the standard to determine the impact, if any, on its financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern” (Subtopic 205-40). Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 explicitly requires management to evaluate, at each annual or interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that exist which raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and annual and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2014-15 impacted disclosure in the Company's financial statements, but did not have any impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases. ASU 2016-02 will also require new qualitative and quantitative disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2016-02 and its impact on its financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers -Principal versus Agent Considerations”. This update provides clarifying guidance regarding the application of ASU No. 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers when another party, along with the reporting entity, is involved in providing a good or a service to a customer. In these circumstances, an entity is required to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or service to the customer (that is, the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (that is, the entity is an agent). The amendments in the Update clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The update is effective, along with ASU 2014-09, for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The company is evaluating its impact on its financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation -Stock Compensation (Topic 71 S)” (“Asti 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 requires an entity to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2016-09 and its impact on its financial statements or disclosures.
On May 9, 2016, The FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2016-12”). ASU 2016-12 provides clarifying guidance in a few narrow areas and adds some practical expedients to the guidance. The effective date and transition requirements for this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2014-09. The Company is evaluating the effect of ASU 2014-12, if any, on its financial statements.
7
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” which addresses the diversity in practice in how certain cash receipt and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows with respect to eight specific cash Flow issues. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented if practical. Early adoption is permitted, including the interim period, and any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal period. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2016-15 and its impact on its financial statements or disclosures.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-1 8, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force),” which clarifies how entities should present restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows, and as a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. An entity with a material balance of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents must disclose information about the nature of the restrictions. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December I5, 2017. Early adoption is permitted and the new guidance must be applied retroactively to all periods presented. The company is evaluating the new guidance's impact on its financial statements.
Note 4 - Debt
Debt consists of the following at February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016:
| | | | | | | | |
Description | | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
A. Secured convertible debt | | $ | 3,480,000 | | | $ | 3,360,000 | |
Less: debt discount | | | (2,200,855 | ) | | | (3,173,333 | ) |
Convertible debt – net | | | 1,279,145 | | | | 186,667 | |
| | | | | | | | |
B. Unsecured convertible debt | | | 106,000 | | | | 131,000 | |
Less: debt discount | | | — | | | | (320 | ) |
Convertible debt – net | | | 106,000 | | | | 130,680 | |
| | | | | | | | |
C. Unsecured demand debt | | | 1,769,418 | | | | 1,816,227 | |
Less: debt discount | | | (4,764 | ) | | | (4,731 | ) |
Unsecured demand debt – net | | | 1,764,654 | | | | 1,811,496 | |
| | | | | | | | |
D. Secured demand debt | | | 1,890,000 | | | | 1,890,000 | |
Less: debt discount | | | — | | | | — | |
Unsecured demand debt – net | | | 1,890,000 | | | | 1,890,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total debt | | $ | 5,039,799 | | | $ | 4,018,843 | |
The Company’s debt amounts to $7,245,418 and is due and payable over the remaining 4 fiscal years as set out below:
| | | | |
Year | | Principal Repayment | |
8/31/2017 | | $ | 2,175,918 | |
8/31/2018 | | | 3,360,000 | |
8/31/2019 | | | 477,621 | |
8/31/2020 | | | 620,231 | |
8/31/2021 | | | 611,648 | |
| | $ | 7,245,418 | |
8
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
The corresponding debts above are more fully discussed below:
(A)
Convertible Debt
| | | | | | | | |
Description | | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Carry forward balance | | $ | 3,491,000 | | | $ | 1,296,597 | |
Borrowings | | | 120,000 | | | | 3,480,000 | |
Loss for additional debt brought about by debt settlements | | | — | | | | 45,147 | |
Repayment of debt | | | (25,000 | ) | | | (25,000 | ) |
Conversion of derivative debt to common stock | | | — | | | | (370,000 | ) |
Reclassification of convertible derivative debt to demand debt | | | — | | | | (936,744 | ) |
Gain on settlement of debt | | | — | | | | (5,000 | ) |
Reclassification of convertible debt to derivative debt due to tainting | | | — | | | | 6,000 | |
Ending balance | | $ | 3,586,000 | | | $ | 3,491,000 | |
During the six months ended February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Hillair Capital Investments L.P. pursuant to which it issued an 8% convertible debenture in an aggregate principal amount of $120,000 due on April 21, 2017. The conversion price in effect on any conversion date shall be equal to $0.02.
Total convertible debt at February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, aggregated principal consists of the following.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Information | | | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Series 8 | | 8% per annum interest; convertible at $0.40 per share; term expired. Shown as derivative due to tainting | | | $ | 100,000 | | | $ | 100,000 | |
Series 12 | | 10% per annum interest; 2-month term; convertible at $0.02 per share. | | | | — | | | | 25,000 | |
Series 13 | | 8% per annum interest; convertible at $0.02 per share; remaining term; term expired | | | | 6,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
Series 14 | | 8% per annum interest; convertible at $0.02 per share only after the Company increases the number of authorized shares; remaining term: 13 months | | | | 3,360,000 | | | | 3,360,000 | |
Short Term | | 8% per annum interest; convertible at $0.02 per share; remaining term: 59 days | | | | 120,000 | | | | — | |
Total | | | | | $ | 3,586,000 | | | $ | 3,491,000 | |
Holders of unsecured convertible debt have the option to convert all or part of the note’s principal plus accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at the conversion price(s) and terms set out above.
(B)
Convertible Debt – Non-derivatives
| | | | | | | | |
Description | | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Carry forward balance | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Borrowings | | | — | | | | (6,000 | ) |
Repayment of convertible debt | | | — | | | | — | |
Conversion of convertible debt to stock | | | — | | | | — | |
Gain on debt settlement | | | — | | | | — | |
Reclassification of convertible debt to derivative due to tainting | | | — | | | | (6,000 | ) |
Ending balance | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
9
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
Holders of convertible debt have the option to convert all or part of the note’s principal plus accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at the conversion price(s) and terms set out above.
(C)
Unsecured Demand/Term Debt
Unsecured demand notes principal balance consists of the following at February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016:
| | | | | | | | |
Description | | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Carry forward balance | | $ | 1,816,227 | | | $ | 382,563 | |
Borrowings | | | 326,053 | | | | 360,000 | |
Loss on additional debt brought about by debt settlements | | | — | | | | 121,360 | |
Repayments | | | (285,362 | ) | | | (165,080 | ) |
Credit of note payable against franchise license agreement | | | — | | | | (100,000 | ) |
Rollup of accrued interest into debt | | | — | | | | 268,140 | |
Rollup of accrued commissions to debt | | | — | | | | 12,500 | |
Reclassification of derivative debt to demand debt | | | — | | | | 936,744 | |
Conversion of demand debt to Preferred B stock | | | (75,000 | ) | | | — | |
Conversion of demand debt to common stock | | | (12,500 | ) | | | — | |
Reclassification to derivative debt due to tainting | | | — | | | | — | |
Ending balance | | $ | 1,769,418 | | | $ | 1,816,227 | |
During the six months ended February 28, 2017, $12,500 principal and $5,400 interest was converted into 447,500 shares of common stock. During the six months ended February 28, 2017, $75,000 principal and $27,369 accrued interest was converted into 30,000 shares of Series B Preferred stock. In connection with conversion, $61,939 gain on settlement of debt and accrued liabilities was recognized.
During the six months ended February 28, 2017, the Company borrowed $326,053 from two entities. The loans are based on the Company’s cash flows and are paid back daily. The loans mature between August 18, 2017 and September 27, 2017.
Unsecured demand notes consisted of the following at February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Information | | Maturity | | | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Represents all unsecured demand debt | | 8% to 12% per annum interest; maturity dates from past due to April 1, 2020 | | | $ | 1,769,418 | | | $ | 1,816,227 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | $ | 1,769,418 | | | $ | 1,816,227 | |
(D)
Secured Demand/Term Debt
| | | | | | | | |
Description | | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Carry forward balance | | $ | 1,890,000 | | | $ | 2,700,000 | |
Borrowings | | | — | | | | — | |
Loss on new debt brought about by debt settlement | | | — | | | | 155,242 | |
Repayment of debt | | | — | | | | (310,000 | ) |
Conversion of debt to Series B preferred stock | | | — | | | | (1,100,000 | ) |
Reclassification of accrued interest to debt | | | — | | | | 444,758 | |
Ending balance | | $ | 1,890,000 | | | $ | 1,890,000 | |
10
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
Secured debt consisted of the following activity and terms for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and the year ended August 31, 2016, respectively:
| | | | | |
Information | | February 28, 2017 | | August 31, 2016 | |
Interest Rate | | 5% | | 5% | |
Maturity | | Nov. 15, 2018 | | Nov. 15, 2018 | |
Second security on the assets of Original Soupman, Inc. | | $1,890,000 | | $1,890,000 | |
(E)
Debt discount
| | | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Total outstanding debt | | $ | 7,245,418 | | | $ | 7,197,227 | |
Carry forward debt discount – net | | | (3,178,384 | ) | | | — | |
Debt discount related to derivatives | | | (12,877 | ) | | | (2,342,138 | ) |
Debt discount related to Series D preferred stock issued along with debt | | | — | | | | (332,640 | ) |
Debt discount related to original issue discounts | | | — | | | | (360,000 | ) |
Debt discount related to debt issue costs | | | (10,495 | ) | | | (423,110 | ) |
Debt discount related to beneficial conversion feature | | | — | | | | (1,800 | ) |
Amortization of debt discount | | | 996,137 | | | | 281,304 | |
Debt – net | | $ | 5,039,799 | | | $ | 4,018,843 | |
Note 5 - Derivative Liabilities
(A)
Valuation
Fair value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments, such as ratchet provisions or conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments, and measurement of their fair value. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. If the instrument is not considered conventional convertible debt, the Company will continue its evaluation process of these instruments as derivative financial instruments.
Once derivative liabilities are determined, they are adjusted to reflect fair value at the end of each reporting period. Any increase or decrease in the fair value is recorded in results of operations as a change in fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are also valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The company determined that the Black Scholes valuation model was comparable to the Binomial Lattice model.
(B)
Conversion Features
The Company identified conversion features embedded within convertible debt and/or warrants issued during the six months ended February 28, 2017 and the year ended August 31, 2016, respectively. They were classified as derivative instruments pursuant to FASB ASC 815 "Derivatives and Hedging." The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company bifurcate the conversion feature and record it as a liability at fair value and the fair value of the warrants were computed as defined in the agreement. The instruments are marked-to-market at fair value as of each balance sheet date. Any change in fair value is recorded as a change in the fair value of derivative liabilities for each reporting period. The fair value of the conversion feature was determined using the Binomial Lattice model. The Company reassesses the classification at each balance sheet date. If the classification changes as a result of events during the period, the contract is reclassified as of the date of the event that caused the reclassification.
11
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
During the year ended August 31, 2016 the company entered into a convertible note payable that was convertible into a variable number of shares (reset ratchet provision) of common stock that exceeds the number of shares the company has authorized. Accordingly, the embedded conversion feature was bifurcated and included as a liability as of February 28, 2017. In addition, the company has reclassified all of its warrants and notes payables with embedded conversion features as derivative liabilities as the company cannot determine it has sufficient authorized shares to settle these contracts.
As February 28, 2017, the fair value of the derivative liability was $2,103,071. The fair value at the commitment and re-measurement dates for convertible debt and warrants that are treated as derivative liabilities were based upon the following management assumptions for the six months ended February 28, 2017:
| | | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Carry forward balance | | $ | 3,311,580 | | | $ | 239,748 | |
Fair value at the commitment date recorded as debt discount | | | 12,877 | | | | 2,342,138 | |
Fair value at the commitment date recorded as derivative expense | | | — | | | | 2,231,865 | |
Fair value at the commitment date - warrants | | | 286,094 | | | | — | |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | — | | | | — | |
Fair value mark-to-market adjustment | | | (1,503,006) | | | | (1,509,401 | ) |
Tainting of derivatives of convertible notes and warrants | | | — | | | | 9,298 | |
Reclassification to APIC for converted debts and debts paid in cash before maturity | | | (4,474) | | | | (2,068 | ) |
Derivative liabilities (balance) | | $ | 2,103,071 | | | $ | 3,311,580 | |
The fair value at the commitment and re-measurement dates for convertible debt and warrants that are treated as derivative liabilities were based upon the following management assumptions for the six months ended February 28, 2017:
| | | | | | |
| | Commitment Date | | | Re-measurement Date | |
Exercise price | | $0.02 - $0.04 | | | $0.02 - $0.04 | |
Expected dividends | | 0% | | | 0% | |
Expected volatility | | 149% - 218% | | | 87% - 197% | |
Expected term: convertible debt and warrants | | 0.08 - 2.0 years | | | 0.07 to 5.0 years | |
Risk free interest rate | | 0.28% - 0.70% | | | 0.32% - 1.54% | |
Note 6 - Stockholders’ Deficit
(A)
Common Stock
During the six months ended February 28, 2017 447,500 shares of common stock were issued for conversion of $12,500 principal and $5,400 accrued interest. The shares were valued for $8,681 thus $9,219 gain on settlement of debt and accrued liabilities was recognized; 13,600,000 shares of common stock were issued to third parties for services rendered, value for $301,631; 25,436,320 shares of common stock were issued for conversion of 2,543,632 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
The Company computes basic and diluted earnings per share by dividing net loss by weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Basic and diluted were the same since the inclusion of common shares issuable would have been anti dilutive.
12
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
The Company has the following potential common stock equivalents at February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016:
| | | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Stock options | | | 1,750,000 | | | | 2,275,000 | |
Warrants | | | 15,006,050 | | | | 6,286,050 | |
Convertible Series A preferred shares (converted to common stock at 1:1 basis) | | | 878,639 | | | | 878,639 | |
Convertible Series B preferred shares (converted to common stock at 1:10 basis) | | | 82,044,192 | | | | 104,315,160 | |
Convertible Series C preferred shares (converted to common stock at 1:20 basis) | | | 34,500,000 | | | | 34,500,000 | |
Convertible Series D preferred shares (converted to common stock at 1:50,000 basis) | | | 33,600,000 | | | | 33,600,000 | |
Convertible debt - derivatives liabilities (exercise price $0.02 - $0.40/share) | | | 175,856,500 | | | | 169,175,000 | |
Total common stock equivalents | | | 343,635,381 | | | | 351,029,849 | |
(B)
Series B Preferred Stock
During the six months ended February 28, 2017 255,923 shares of Series Preferred B was issued for conversion of $75,000 principal and $27,369 accrued interest. The shares were valued for $49,649 thus $52,720 gain on settlement of debt and accrued liabilities were recognized; 60,612 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were issued to related parties for services rendered, valued for $8,220.
(C)
Stock Options
There were no stock options issued for the six months ended February 28, 2017. The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the six months ended February 28, 2017.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |
Balance – August 31, 2016 | | | 2,275,000 | | $ | 0.46 | | | 4.16 year | | | | — | |
Granted | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | |
Balance – February 28, 2017 | | | 2,275,000 | | $ | 0.46 | | | 3.66 year | | | | — | |
Exercisable – February 28, 2017 | | | 2,275,000 | | $ | 0.46 | | | 3.66 year | | | | — | |
Grant date fair value of options granted | | | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average grant date fair value | | | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding options held by related parties (February 28, 2017) | | | 1,750,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable options held by related parties (February 28, 2017) | | | 1,750,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the six months ended February 28, 2017 the Company had no expenses related to vested options.
(D)
Stock Warrants
During the six months ended February 28, 2017 the Company granted 9,200,000 stock warrants for services, with an exercise price of $0.02. The expected term fluctuates between .5 to 5 years. They were classified as derivative liability and the Black-Scholes Model was used to determine their grant value. The company recorded a charge to operations of $286,094 for the fair value of the warrants.
13
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
The following is a summary of the Company’s stock warrant activity for the six months ended February 28, 2017. Any warrants that were not exercised during the term of the warrants are shown in the below table as forfeited:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Warrants | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
Balance at August 31, 2016 | | | 6,286,050 | | | $ | 0.33 | |
Granted (for debt) | | | — | | | | — | |
Granted (services) | | | 9,200,000 | | | | 0.02 | |
Exercised | | | — | | | | — | |
Expired | | | (480,000 | ) | | | 0.80 | |
Balance at February 28, 2017 | | | 15,006,050 | | | $ | 0.15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Warrants Outstanding | | | Warrants Exercisable | |
Range of Exercise Price | | Number Outstanding | | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Number Exercisable | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Intrinsic Value | |
$0.02 -$0.80 | | 15,006,050 | | | 3.39 | | | $0.15 | | | 15,006,050 | | | $0.15 | | | $— | |
The Company account for common stock warrants as either equity instruments or derivative liabilities depending on the specific terms of the warrant agreement. Stock warrants are accounted for as derivative liabilities if the warrants allow for cash settlement or provide for modification of the warrant exercise price in the event subsequent sales of common stock by the Company are at a lower price per share than the then-current warrant exercise price. The company classifies derivative warrant liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value, and changes in fair value are presented in the statement of operations, which is revalued at each balance sheet date subsequent to the initial issuance of the stock warrant.
Note 7- Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is obligated to pay the minority stockholder of Kiosk an amount equal to 3% of its gross soup sales on the first $50,000,000 in sales, 2% of sales between $50,000,000 and $75,000,000, and 1% of sales thereafter, in perpetuity. The Company was obligated to pay the minority stockholder a minimum against these sales of $225,000 per year through June 30, 2014 provided certain services to the Company were rendered. For the six months ended February 28, 2017 and the year ended August 31, 2016, the Company recorded these payments as royalty expense.
Litigations, Claims and Assessments
Soupman, Inc. is a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Mark Hellner and four other plaintiffs in New York State Supreme Court (Case Index No. 6083/2014). The plaintiffs are holders of a series of notes issued by the Company and are seeking repayment of the notes with interest. The plaintiffs have prevailed in the action and on July 22, 2015 submitted a proposed judgment for $299,202. The entry of this judgment has been fully reserved by the Company.
Soupman, Inc. is a defendant in a case initiates by Brand Initiatives Group LLC v. Soupman. Inc., Index No. 651647/2016. In March 2016, plaintiff initiated an action against the Company for the Company's alleged breach of a marketing contract. Plaintiff commenced this action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Plaintiff asserted causes of action for breach of contract, conversion, account stated, and quasi-contract/unjust enrichment. The Company answered the complaint, and asserted affirmative defenses and counterclaims seeking damages for plaintiff's breach of contract and a declaratory judgment providing that plaintiff was not entitled to receive any consideration under the contract due to its breach of contract. Plaintiff served a reply to the Company's counterclaims and asserted affirmative defenses to those counterclaims. The parties have served discovery demands upon each other. Neither party has responded the other's discovery demands. There has been no motion practice and no conference with the court has been scheduled. The Company intends to vigorously contest plaintiff s allegations and prosecute the Company's counterclaims, and believes that the Company has meritorious defenses to plaintiff s claims in this action.
14
Soupman, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 28, 2017
(Unaudited)
Note 8 – Concentrations
During the six months ended February 28, 2017 the company recorded revenues to three customers of $407,460 (23%); $357,000 (20%) and $207,961 (12%).
For the six months ended February 28, 2017 the company primarily purchased finished goods from one vendor.
Note 9 – Subsequent Events
The Company missed an interest payment that was scheduled to be made on April 21, 2017 to Hillair but they have extended the time to May 15, 2017. If the Company does not make the payment on May 15, absent further extension and agreement by Hillair, the Company will be in default under the loan with Hillair.
The Company is also in receipt of a notice of default on a Stipulation of Settlement with a noteholder Perry Trebatch.
Since February 28, 2017, the Company has issued 20,857,429 shares of its common stock for the conversion of 2,085,743 of its Series B preferred shares.
Since February 28, 2017, the Company has issued 250,000 shares of its common stock for services having an aggregate fair value of $4,350 based on the quoted closing trading price on the date of issuance.
Since February 28, 2017, the Company has issued 6,349,206 shares of its common stock for the issuance of debt having an aggregate fair value of $95,238 based on the quoted trading price on the date of issuance. If the Company repays the debt within the terms of the debt agreement, the shares will be returned to the Company.
15
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations for the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, including footnotes, and other information presented elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the risk factors and the financial statements and the other information set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand our results of operations and financial condition.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report and other documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission contain forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about our future performance, our business, our beliefs and our management’s assumptions. Statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, including forward-looking information concerning pharmacy sales trends, prescription margins, number and location of new store openings, outcomes of litigation, and the level of capital expenditures, industry trends, demographic trends, growth strategies, financial results, cost reduction initiatives, acquisition synergies, regulatory approvals, and competitive strengths. Words such as “expect,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “continue,” “sustain”, “on track”, “believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “assume,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are often used to identify such forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in our reports that we file or furnish with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those indicated or anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions or otherwise.
OVERVIEW
Description of the Company
Unless otherwise stated, the terms "we," "us", "our" and the "company" refer to Soupman, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We manufacture and sell soups under the brand name “Original Soupman”. Our soups can be purchased in national supermarket chains such as Kroger, Publix and Safeway in shelf stable Tetra Recart packaging allowing for maximum shelf life and freshness in every carton. The annual market size for soup sales to grocery and chain stores in the US is approximately $6.4 billion.
We also sell our Original Soupman soups in flash-frozen “heat ‘n serve” pouches, to our franchisees such as our flagship store at 55th street and 8th avenue, the Mohegan Sun Casino in Connecticut, Mohegan Sun Resorts in Atlantic City New Jersey, the Original Soupman and Delicatessen at Roosevelt Field mall in Long Island, New York, and to educational institutions (such as the New York City Public school system). In addition to our soups, we sell to our educational institution customers, various vegetarian items such a Mexicali Beans, Stewed Pinto Beans and Curried Chick Peas with Tomatillos, which are low in fat, low in sodium and high in dietary fiber.
No franchises were sold during the six months ended February 28, 2017.
Executive Summary
This Executive Summary provides significant highlights from the discussion and analysis that follows. Each balance sheet comparison compares February 28, 2017 (the end of the current period) to August 31, 2016 (the end of the prior fiscal year); each income statement comparison compares the six months ended February 28, 2017 to the six months ended February 29, 2016.
·
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased approximately 16% or approximately $656,000.
16
·
Net debt increased by approximately 25% or $1 million, due to an increase in borrowings and the amortization of debt discount to interest expense.
·
Revenue increased 13% or $223,000 due primarily an increase in sales to grocery stores and a decrease in bulk sales due to lower bulk inventory.
·
Tetra sales increased 83%, or approximately $779,000. Our year-over-year increase in our grocery store sales is primarily attributable to the acquisition of new customers and increased re-orders due to our overall marketing and promotional efforts including sampling, in-store radio, in-store discounting of our products and slotting.
·
Operating expenses increased 37% or approximately $ 626,000 due primarily to increases in stock based compensation to consultants and increases in promotion to drive tetra pak sales in grocery chains.
·
Net loss decreased 20% or approximately $426,000 due primarily to a decrease in other expenses mainly attributable to the change in fair value of derivative liabilities and to a lesser extent a decrease in compensation expense.
Year-over-year comparability of earnings and earnings per share
The following items affected the comparability of year-over-year earnings and earnings per share:
| | |
| · | During the six months ended February 28, 2017 we posted a change in fair value of derivatives liabilities of $1,507,480. |
| | |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
We own 80% controlling interest in KIOSK; the remaining 20% is owned by Al Yeganeh, from whom we license our soup recipes. The noncontrolling interests' share in the net loss was included in net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in the consolidated statements of operations.
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
There were no unusual or infrequent events or transactions, or significant economic changes that materially affected the amount of reported income or expenses from operations and nor is the Company aware of any known uncertainties that it reasonably expects will have a material impact income or expenses from operations, other than in the normal course of business such as seasonality.
Results of Operations –Three Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016
The following table summarizes our operating results for the three months ended February 28, 2017 and 2016; all amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousandth.
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2/28/2017 | | | 2/29/2016 | |
Revenue | | $ | 828,000 | | | $ | 932,000 | |
Cost of Sales | | | 609,000 | | | | 832,000 | |
Gross Profit | | | 219,000 | | | | 100,000 | |
Operating Expenses | | | 1,186,000 | | | | 971,000 | |
Loss from Operations | | | (967,000 | ) | | | (871,000 | ) |
Other Income | | | (204,000 | ) | | | (574,000 | ) |
Net Loss (including non-controlling interest) | | $ | (1,171,000 | ) | | $ | (1,445,000 | ) |
17
Soup sales
Soup sales accounted for approximately 94% and 84% of overall revenue for the three months ended February 28, 2017 and 2016, respectively, while franchise activities accounted for the remaining 6% and 16%, respectively. Our year-over-year revenues decreased approximately 11%. Tetra sales for the quarter increased by $258,000 however, bulk sales for the quarter declined by $256,000 and franchise sales and royalties for the quarter declined by $106,000 leading to an overall decline in revenues for the quarter of $104,000 compared to the same quarter last year. The decline in bulk revenues is due to a lack of sufficient capital to purchase inventory for our bulk customers, including our own franchise stores.
The following table summarizes our soup sales for the three months ended February 28, 2017 and 2016; all amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousandth. Soup sales are net of slotting fees (a onetime fee charged by supermarkets in order to have the product placed on their shelves) and sales discounts (early payment discounts).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2/28/2017 | | | 2/29/2016 | |
| | Sales | | | % of sales | | | Sales | | | % of sales | |
Gross grocery store sales – net of slotting & early payment | | $ | 757,000 | | | 97 | % | | $ | 499,000 | | | 64 | % |
Educational Institutions | | | 25,000 | | | | 3 | % | | | 90,000 | | | | 12 | % |
Franchises | | | — | | | | 0 | % | | | 191,000 | | | | 24 | % |
Net sales | | $ | 782,000 | | | | | | | $ | 780,000 | | | | | |
Our year-over-year increase in our grocery store sales is primarily attributable to the acquisition of new customers and increased re-orders due to our overall marketing and promotional efforts including sampling, in-store radio, in-store discounting of our products and slotting.
Cost of Sales
The following table summarizes our cost of sales for the three months ended February 28, 2017 and 2016; all amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousandth. Cost of sales represents costs associated with soup sales only; the Company has no cost of sales associated with franchise activities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2/28/2017 | | | 2/29/2016 | |
| | Costs | | | % of Total | | | Costs | | | % of Total | |
Grocery Stores | | $ | 509,000 | | | | 83 | % | | $ | 532,000 | | | | 64 | % |
Educational Institutions | | | 18,000 | | | | 3 | % | | | 76,000 | | | | 9 | % |
Franchisees | | | — | | | | 0 | % | | | 135,000 | | | | 16 | % |
Freight | | | 82,000 | | | | 13 | % | | | 89,000 | | | | 11 | % |
Total | | $ | 609,000 | | | | | | | $ | 832,000 | | | | | |
Operating Expenses
Year over year operating expenses increased 22% or approximately $215,000. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in stock based compensation to consultants and increases in promotion to drive tetra pak sales in grocery chains. The following table summarizes major components of our operating expenses for the three months ended February 28, 2017 and February 28, 2016; all amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousandth.
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2/28/2017 | | | 02/29/2016 | |
Compensation expense | | | 292,000 | | | | 466,000 | |
Stock based compensation | | | 328,000 | | | | — | |
Professional fees | | | 148,000 | | | | 175,000 | |
Marketing/Advertising/Branding/Public Relations/Promotions | | | 212,000 | | | | 143,000 | |
Travel | | | 50,000 | | | | 73,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other Income (Expense)
Year-over-year other expenses decreased approximately 64%, from an approximately $370,000. This increase was primarily attributable to change in fair value of derivative liabilities.
18
Net Loss
Year-over-year net loss decreased approximately 19% or $274,000 due to the various factors discussed above, which impacted revenue, cost of sales, gross profit and operating expenses. Our year-over-year basic and diluted net loss per share decreased by $0.06, due primarily to a narrow loss for the period.
Results of Operations –Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016
The following table summarizes our operating results for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and 2016; all amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousandth.
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2/28/2017 | | | 2/29/2016 | |
Revenue | | $ | 1,877,000 | | | $ | 1,654,000 | |
Cost of Sales | | | 1,408,000 | | | | 1,229,000 | |
Gross Profit | | | 469,000 | | | | 425,000 | |
Operating Expenses | | | 2,309,000 | | | | 1,683,000 | |
Loss from Operations | | | (1,840,000 | ) | | | (1,258,000 | ) |
Other Income | | | 180,000 | | | | (828,000 | ) |
Net Loss (including non-controlling interest) | | $ | (1,660,000) | | | $ | (2,086,000 | ) |
Soup sales
Soup sales accounted for approximately 96% and 82% of overall revenue for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and 2016, respectively, while franchise activities accounted for the remaining 4% and 18%, respectively. Our year-over-year revenues increased approximately 13%.
The following table summarizes our soup sales for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and 2016; all amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousandth. Soup sales are net of slotting fees (a onetime fee charged by supermarkets in order to have the product placed on their shelves) and sales discounts (early payment discounts).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2/28/2017 | | | 2/29/2016 | |
| | Sales | | | % of sales | | | Sales | | | % of sales | |
Gross grocery store sales | | $ | 1,700,000 | | | 95 | % | | $ | 928,000 | | | 69 | % |
Educational Institutions | | | 93,000 | | | | 5 | % | | | 147,000 | | | | 11 | % |
Franchises | | | — | | | | 0 | % | | | 277,000 | | | | 20 | % |
Net sales | | $ | 1,793,000 | | | | | | | $ | 1,352,000 | | | | | |
Our year-over-year increase in our grocery store sales is primarily attributable to the acquisition of new customers and increased re-orders due to our overall marketing and promotional efforts including sampling, in-store radio, in-store discounting of our products and slotting.
Cost of Sales
The following table summarizes our cost of sales for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and 2016; all amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousandth. Cost of sales represents costs associated with soup sales only; the Company has no cost of sales associated with franchise activities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2/28/2017 | | | 2/29/2016 | |
| | Costs | | | % of Total | | | Costs | | | % of Total | |
Grocery Stores | | $ | 1,170,000 | | | | 83 | % | | $ | 791,000 | | | | 64 | % |
Educational Institutions | | | 72,000 | | | | 5 | % | | | 118,000 | | | | 10 | % |
Franchisees | | | — | | | | 0 | % | | | 200,000 | | | | 16 | % |
Freight | | | 166,000 | | | | 12 | % | | | 120,000 | | | | 10 | % |
Total | | $ | 1,408,000 | | | | | | | $ | 1,229,000 | | | | | |
19
Operating Expenses
Year over year operating expenses increased approximately 37% or approximately $626,000. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in stock based compensation to consultants and increases in promotion to drive tetra pak sales in grocery chains.
The following table summarizes major components of our operating expenses for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016; all amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousandth.
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2/29/2017 | | | 2/29/2016 | |
Compensation expense | | | 595,000 | | | | 744,000 | |
Professional fees | | | 112,000 | | | | 348,000 | |
Stock based compensation | | | 643,000 | | | | — | |
Marketing/Advertising/Branding/Public Relations/Promotions | | | 516,000 | | | | 248,000 | |
Travel | | | 110,000 | | | | 118,000 | |
Insurance | | | 41,000 | | | | 64,000 | |
Other Income (Expense)
Year-over-year other expenses decreased approximately 122% or approximately $1,000,000. This decrease was primarily attributable to change in fair value of derivative liabilities.
Net Loss
Year-over-year net loss decreased approximately 20% due to the various factors discussed above, which impacted revenue, cost of sales, gross profit and operating expenses. Our year-over-year basic and diluted net loss per share decreased by $0.06 per share.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company will require additional funding to finance the growth of its current and expected future operations as well as to achieve its strategic objectives. The Company believes its current available cash along with anticipated revenues will be insufficient to meet its cash needs for the immediately foreseeable future. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. Therefore, if further financing is unavailable to the Company in the foreseeable future for any reason whatsoever, the Company may be forced to pursue a strategy of reorganization or liquidation.
Our net cash used from operations was approximately $1.5 million during the six months ended February 28, 2017 compared to a net loss of approximately $1.7 million, and repaid debt and accrued interest of approximately $310,000, during the six months ended February 28, 2017.
The following table summarizes our working capital as of February 28, 2017, and August 31, 2016; all amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousandth.
| | | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2017 | | | August 31, 2016 | |
Current assets | | $ | 1,288,000 | | | $ | 2,141,000 | |
Current liabilities | | | (10,643,000 | ) | | | (11,292,000 | ) |
Working capital (deficit) | | $ | (9,355,000 | ) | | $ | (9,151,000 | ) |
At February 28, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $ $23,000 as compared to approximately $1,425,000 at August 31, 2016. During the six months ended February 28, 2017, our working capital deficit increased approximately $205,000 primarily attributable to an increase in total debt and accounts payables of approximately $1,000,000 and $656,000 respectively, offset by decreases in cash and prepaid expenses of approximately $1,400,000 and $70,000, respectively.
20
Current and Future Financing Needs
The Company has incurred a stockholders’ deficit of approximately $10.6 million through February 28, 2017 and has incurred a net loss including non-controlling interest of approximately $1.7 million for the six months ended February 28, 2017. We have incurred negative cash flow from operations since inception and have primarily financed our operations through the sale of stock and the issuance of notes. At February 28, 2017, we had short-term debt of approximately $3.8 million and a working capital deficit of approximately $9.4 million. The Company received a termination letter from its Tetra pak manufacturer, but has reached an oral agreement to extend time to cure and is working out payment arrangements on the $332,000 balance. If the agreement is terminated, the Company’s ability to produce soup would be seriously impaired until such time as the Company found an alternative tetra supplier. The aforementioned factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating m the recoverability and classification of asset amounts or the classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.
The actual amount of funds we will need to operate is subject to many factors, some of which are beyond our control. The Company will require additional funding to finance the growth of its current and expected future operations as well as to achieve its strategic objectives. The Company believes its current available cash along with anticipated revenues will be insufficient to meet its cash needs for the immediately foreseeable future. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. Therefore, if further financing is unavailable to the Company in the foreseeable future for any reason whatsoever, the Company may be forced to pursue a strategy of reorganization or liquidation.
We do not have sufficient cash to operate our business at the current level for the foreseeable future and insufficient cash to achieve our business goals. If our anticipated sales for the next few months do not meet our expectations, our existing resources will not be sufficient to meet our cash flow requirements. Furthermore, if our expenses exceed our anticipations, we will need additional funds to implement our business plan. We will not be able to fully establish our business if we do not have adequate working capital so we will need to raise additional funds, whether through a stock offering or otherwise.
While we believe, we will need to rise between $10 and $15 million to implement our full business strategy; we believe that if we are able to raise no less than $2.5 million during the next quarter, it will be sufficient to support our normal operations for the next 12 months. If we are unable to raise the $10 to $15 million, we will not be able to make potential acquisitions, may have to reduce our marketing and promotion efforts and potentially the size of our operations as well, unless current sales increase enough to support implementing our full business plan. We believe that at $5 million in sales, our operations would be self-sustaining and cash flow positive. If we are forced to reduce our marketing and promotion efforts and/or size of our operations because we are unable to raise at least $2.5 million or pay outstanding notes, and current sales do not increase enough to support implementing our business plan, our revenues will likely be less than had we been able to implement our full program, and as a direct result our income may suffer, and may not be sufficient to cover our negative cash flow, negatively affecting our liquidity and ability to operate.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Not applicable.
21
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a)
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company has adopted and maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Form 10-Q, is collected, recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As required under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, the Company’s management, including its CEO the Principal Executive Officer and its CFO the Principal Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b)
Changes in internal controls over financial reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended February 28, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
22
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Soupman, Inc. is a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Mark Hellner and four other plaintiffs in New York State Supreme Court (Case Index No. 6083/2014). The plaintiffs are holders of a series of notes issued by the Company and are seeking repayment of the notes with interest. The plaintiffs have prevailed in the action and on July 22, 2015 submitted a proposed judgment for $299,202. The entry of this judgment has been fully reserved by the Company.
Soupman, Inc. is a defendant in a case initiates by Brand Initiatives Group LLC v. Soupman. Inc., Index No. 651647/2016. In March 2016, plaintiff initiated an action against the Company for the Company's alleged breach of a marketing contract. Plaintiff commenced this action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Plaintiff asserted causes of action for breach of contract, conversion, account stated, and quasi-contract/unjust enrichment. The Company answered the complaint, and asserted affirmative defenses and counterclaims seeking damages for plaintiff's breach of contract and a declaratory judgment providing that plaintiff was not entitled to receive any consideration under the contract due to its breach of contract. Plaintiff served a reply to the Company's counterclaims and asserted affirmative defenses to those counterclaims. The parties have served discovery demands upon each other. Neither party has responded the other's discovery demands. There has been no motion practice and no conference with the court has been scheduled. The Company intends to vigorously contest plaintiff s allegations and prosecute the Company's counterclaims, and believes that the Company has meritorious defenses to plaintiff s claims in this action.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
During the six months ended February 28, 2017 447,500 shares of common stock was issued for conversion of $12,500 principal and $5,400 accrued interest. The shares were valued for $8,681 thus $9,219 gain on settlement of debt and accrued liabilities was recognized; 13,600,000 shares of common stock were issued to third parties for services rendered, value for $301,631; 25,436,320 shares of common stock were issued for conversion of 2,543,632 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
During the six months ended February 28, 2017 255,923 shares of Series Preferred B was issued for conversion of $75,000 principal and $27,369 accrued interest. The shares were valued for $49,649 thus $52,720 gain on settlement of debt and accrued liabilities were recognized; 60,612 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were issued to relate parties for services rendered, valued for $8,220.
These securities issued upon conversions were issued pursuant to the exemption provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The securities issued for services rendered were issued pursuant to the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The holders represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view towards distribution. The holders were given adequate information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to the restricted stock.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.
The Company missed an interest payment that was scheduled to be made on April 21, 2017 to Hillair but they have extended the time to May 15, 2017. If the Company does not make the payment on May 15, absent further extension and agreement by Hillair, the Company will be in default under the loan with Hillair. The Company is also in receipt of a notice of default on a Stipulation of Settlement with a noteholder Perry Trebatch.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure.
Not Applicable
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
23
Item 6. Exhibits.
| | |
Exhibit | | |
Number | | Description |
| | |
31.1* | | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31.2* | | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1* | | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
| | |
32.2* | | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
| | |
101.INS** | | XBRL Instance |
| | |
101.XSD** | | XBRL Schema |
| | |
101.CAL** | | XBRL Calculation |
| | |
101.DEF** | | XBRL Definition |
| | |
101.LAB** | | XBRL Label |
| | |
101.PRE** | | XBRL Presentation |
———————
* Filed herewith
** Filed herewith electronically
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| SOUPMAN, INC. |
| | |
Date: May 4, 2017 | By: | /s/ Jamieson Karson |
| | Jamieson Karson |
| | Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | |
| SOUPMAN, INC. |
| | |
Date: May 4, 2017 | By: | /s/ Robert Bertrand |
| | Robert Bertrand |
| | President & CFO |
| | (Principal Financial Officer) |
25