Greektown Superholdings 10-12G Registration of securities

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10

GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) 27-2216916
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)

555 East Lafayette
Detroit, Michigan 48226
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(313) 223-2999
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

with copies to:

Allan S. Brilliant
Richard A. Goldberg
Dechert LLP
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: (212) 698-3500
Facsimile: (212) 698-3599 Martin C. Glass
Goodwin Procter LLP
The New York Times Building
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10018
Telephone: (212) 813-8300
Facsimile: (212) 355-3333

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Warrants

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer£     Accelerated filer£     Non-accelerated filerR     Smaller reporting company£

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
ITEM 1. BUSINESS		2
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS		15
ITEM 2. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		25
ITEM 3. PROPERTIES		46
ITEM 4. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		47
ITEM 5. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS		49
ITEM 6. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		52
ITEM 7. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE		56
ITEM 8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		59
ITEM 9. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS		59
ITEM 10. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES		59
ITEM 11. DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED		59
ITEM 12. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS		63
ITEM 13. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA		64
ITEM 14. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE		64
ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS		64
EXHIBIT INDEX		67

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This registration statement on Form 10 contains statements that we believe are, or may be considered to be, “forward-looking statements.” All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this registration statement regarding the prospects of our industry or our prospects, plans, financial position or business strategy may constitute forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “foresee,” “project,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “forecast,” “continue” or “could” or the negative of these terms or variations of them or similar terms. Furthermore, forward-looking statements may be included in various filings that we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or press releases or oral statements made by or with the approval of one of our authorized executive officers. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that these expectations will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 15 of this registration statement. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained in this registration statement, which reflect management’s opinions only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to any forward-looking statements. You are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures we make in our reports to the SEC. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this registration statement.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Background

Greektown Holdings, L.L.C. (“Greektown Holdings”) was formed in September 2005 as a limited liability company owned by Kewadin Greektown Casino, L.L.C. (“Kewadin Greektown”), which is 100% owned by Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (the “Tribe”), and Monroe Partners, L.L.C. (“Monroe”). Greektown Holdings owns Greektown Casino, L.L.C. (“Greektown LLC”), which is engaged in the operation of a hotel and casino gaming facility known as Greektown Casino Hotel (“Greektown Casino”) located in downtown Detroit that opened November 10, 2000 under a license granted by the Michigan Gaming Control Board (“MGCB”) and a Development Agreement with the City of Detroit.

On May 29, 2008, Greektown Holdings, together with its direct and indirect subsidiaries and certain affiliates, filed voluntary petitions to reorganize their businesses under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by the Bankruptcy Court, the details of which are described in “Bankruptcy Considerations” on page 3, Greektown Superholdings, Inc. (“Greektown Superholdings,” and together with its subsidiaries, “we,” “our,” “us” or “Greektown”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on March 17, 2010. As of the Effective Date (as defined below in “Bankruptcy Considerations” on page 3), each of Greektown Superholdings and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Greektown Newco Sub, Inc. (the “Greektown Sub”), will hold 50% of the outstanding membership interests of Greektown Holdings. Greektown Superholdings currently has no assets or liabilities other than 100% stock ownership in Greektown Sub. On the Effective Date, Greektown Superholdings will remain as a holding company that has no assets, except that Greektown Superholdings will own 50% of the issued and outstanding membership interests of Greektown Holdings and 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Greektown Sub. Through its direct and indirect ownership of Greektown LLC, Greektown Superholdings will own and operate Greektown Casino. Greektown LLC also holds all the ownership interests in Contract Builders Corporation (“Contract Builders”), Realty Equity Company, Inc. (“Realty Equity”) and Trappers GC Partner, LLC (“Trappers”), each of which own real estate

2

near Greektown Casino. The assets of Trappers will be transferred to Greektown Casino and Trappers will be dissolved upon the Effective Date. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, the following discussion describes the business and operations of Greektown Superholdings after the Effective Date. Greektown Superholdings’ corporate headquarters are located at 555 East Lafayette, Detroit, Michigan 48226.

The following organizational chart describes the organizational structure of Greektown Superholdings as of the Effective Date.

Bankruptcy Considerations

The following discussion provides general background information regarding the Chapter 11 cases involving Greektown Holdings, and is not intended to be an exhaustive summary.

On May 29, 2008 (the “Petition Date”), Greektown Holdings, its direct and indirect subsidiaries and certain affiliates (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions to reorganize their businesses under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (the “Bankruptcy Court”). These cases were consolidated under the caption, “In re Greektown Holdings, L.L.C., et al. Case No. 08-53104.” On August 26, 2009, the Debtors filed the Second Amended Joint Plans of Reorganization (the “Debtor Plan”) and the Second Amended Disclosure Statement for Joint Plans of Reorganization (the “Debtor Disclosure Statement”). On September 3, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Debtor Disclosure Statement.

On November 2, 2009, certain holders of the 10-3/4% Senior Notes due 2013 (the “Senior Notes”) issued by Greektown Holdings and Greektown Holdings II, Inc. together with certain other creditors of the Debtors that are parties to that certain Purchase and Put Agreement (as amended by that certain First Amendment to Purchase and Put Agreement dated January 11, 2010, the “Purchase and Put Agreement”) dated November 2, 2009 (the “Put Parties”) filed an alternative plan of reorganization. On November 3, 2009, the Debtors agreed to voluntarily continue the hearing on confirmation of the Debtor Plan (the “Debtor Plan Confirmation Hearing”), which was scheduled for that date, for 24 hours, to engage in discussions with the Put Parties. On November 4, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court further continued the Debtor Plan Confirmation Hearing to allow for further discussions regarding a consensual resolution. On November 29, 2009, the Debtors, the Put

3

Parties, the agent for the pre-petition secured lenders, the agent for the lenders under the debtor-in-possession credit facility (the “DIP Facility”), an ad hoc group of pre-petition secured lenders, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Creditors’ Committee”), and the indenture trustee for the Senior Notes (the “Indenture Trustee”) filed a stipulation containing the terms on which all such parties would support the confirmation of the plan proposed by the Put Parties. On December 7, 2009, the Put Parties, joined by the Creditors’ Committee and the Indenture Trustee as “Noteholder Plan Proponents,” filed the Second Amended Joint Plans of Reorganization for the Debtors Proposed by Noteholder Plan Proponents Including Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and Indenture Trustee (the “Plan”) and the Disclosure Statement for Second Amended Joint Plans of Reorganization for the Debtors Proposed by Noteholder Plan Proponents Including Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and Indenture Trustee (the “Disclosure Statement”). The Disclosure Statement had been previously presented to the Bankruptcy Court, and on December 4, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Disclosure Statement.

Commencing on December 11, 2009, the Disclosure Statement, ballots for voting to accept or reject the Plan and other solicitation documents were distributed to all classes of creditors eligible to vote on the proposed Plan. The deadline for submitting ballots for voting to accept or reject the Plan was January 4, 2010. On January 11, 2010, the Debtors’ claims and voting agent filed its certification of voting results with the Bankruptcy Court reporting that, pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the requisite number of creditors to provide an impaired accepting class at each Debtor approved the Plan. Pursuant to the “cram-down” provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the Plan was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court without the affirmative vote of other classes of creditors on January 22, 2010. The effectiveness of the Plan is conditioned, among other things, on the receipt of all required authorizations, consents and regulatory approvals, including those from the City of Detroit and the MGCB, obtaining the Revolving Loan, as defined below, the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions precedent in the documents governing the Exit Financing, as defined below, and the actions, documents and agreements necessary to implement the Plan being satisfactory in form and substance to the Put Parties prior to June 30, 2010. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of such conditions, it is expected that the Plan will become effective and the Debtors will emerge from bankruptcy prior to such date (the date of effectiveness of the Plan, the “Effective Date”).

The Plan generally provides for the full payment or reinstatement of allowed administrative claims, priority claims, post-petition secured claims, and pre-petition secured claims, the satisfaction of general unsecured claims through the distribution of cash and litigation trust interests and the cancellation of the existing equity interests in Greektown Holdings. The Plan provides that the holders of Senior Notes will receive all of the shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Common Stock”) issued pursuant to the Plan and rights to purchase their pro rata share of a certain number of shares of our preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Preferred Stock”) issued in a rights offering pursuant to the Plan (the “Rights Offering”) plus litigation trust interests. To the extent that holders of Senior Notes do not exercise their right to purchase shares of Preferred Stock, the Put Parties agreed to purchase such shares under the Purchase and Put Agreement (the “Put Commitment”). In consideration for entering into the Purchase and Put Agreement, the Put Parties are entitled to a put premium in the aggregate equal to (i) $10 million (the “Cash Put Premium”) and (ii) 222,222 shares of Preferred Stock (the “Stock Put Premium”). However, each Put Party has the right to accept its pro rata share of 111,111 shares of Preferred Stock in lieu of the Cash Put Premium. Certain of the Put Parties assigned their Put Commitment and certain of their other rights and obligations under the Purchase and Put Agreement to other Put Parties pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated as of March 31, 2010. The sale of the Preferred Stock in the Rights Offering together with the direct purchase of certain shares of Preferred Stock by certain of the Put Parties will provide approximately $196 million in net proceeds to the Debtors’ estates taking into account the Cash Put Premiums to which certain of the Put Parties will be entitled. All of such purchases are to be completed on the Effective Date. The shares of Preferred Stock that will be purchased as described above will be issued on the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter. Each party who agreed to purchase Preferred Stock was given the option to purchase Preferred Stock with regular or reduced voting rights. However, if any party elects to purchase Preferred Stock and is concerned that it might acquire more than 4.9% of

4

the capital stock of Greektown Superholdings, or if a party that qualifies as an “Institutional Investor” under Michigan gaming law is concerned that it may acquire more than 14.9% of the capital stock of Greektown Superholdings, such party may elect to receive Warrants (as defined in Item 11) to purchase Preferred Stock representing a portion of the Preferred Stock that it had elected to purchase. As a result, the holders of Senior Notes and the Put Parties will own all of the outstanding equity interests of Greektown Superholdings as of the Effective Date. In addition, under the Plan, at the end of the day on the Effective Date, Greektown Holdings’ existing members’ capital (deficit) will be extinguished and no distributions will be made to existing members.

On the Effective Date, we expect that Greektown Superholdings will issue approximately $385 million in Senior Secured Notes (the “New Senior Secured Notes”) and will enter into a $30 million revolving credit facility which Greektown Superholdings is currently seeking to obtain (the “Revolving Loan” and, together with the New Senior Secured Notes, the “Exit Financing”). On the Effective Date, we expect to use the proceeds of the Rights Offering, the proceeds of the direct purchase of Preferred Stock, and the proceeds from the sale of the New Senior Secured Notes to repay all outstanding borrowings under the DIP Facility, to repay the pre-petition secured claims, and to make other payments required upon exit from bankruptcy. The proceeds from the sale of the New Senior Secured Notes remaining after the foregoing payments have been made, if any, as well as the Revolving Loan will be used to provide ongoing liquidity to conduct post-reorganization operations. For further detail regarding the Exit Financing, see Item 2—“Financial Information-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Business Overview

Greektown Casino opened in November 2000 in downtown Detroit as one of only three commercial casinos licensed to operate in Michigan. As previously discussed, as of the Effective Date, Greektown Superholdings will directly, and indirectly through Greektown Sub, hold all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of Greektown Holdings, which holds all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of Greektown LLC.

In February 2009, Greektown Casino completed an expansive renovation and expansion at a cost of approximately $336.3 million (the “Expanded Complex”). The Expanded Complex offers a full range of gaming, dining and entertainment alternatives, including:

• an approximately 100,000 square-foot casino with 2,600 slot machines and 69 table games, including an approximately 12,500 square-foot salon dedicated to high-limit gaming and the largest live poker room in the Metro Detroit Gaming Market (as defined below);

• approximately 2,950 attached and 1,750 unattached parking spaces, including over 600 parking spaces for valet parking services;

• 10,000 square feet of convention space;

• a 400-room hotel;

• four restaurants, including a 175-seat “International Buffet”;

• several food outlets on the gaming floor; and

• nine bars and two entertainment facilities.

Access to Greektown Casino is facilitated by a nearby off-ramp from Interstate 375 and six interstate highways passing through downtown Detroit. We estimate that Greektown Casino attracts approximately 17,000 patrons per day on average, and we believe a significant number of these patrons make regular visits to our property. Our players club, known as “Club Greektown,” is a membership/loyalty program that attracts customers by offering incentives to frequent casino visitors. We had approximately 1.2 million people in our database for Club Greektown as of December 31, 2009, approximately 157,000 of whom had visited Greektown Casino during the preceding 90 days. We believe the gaming market in the Detroit area, which consists of three commercial casinos in Michigan (the “Detroit Commercial Casinos”), together with the commercial casino in Windsor,

5

Ontario (the “Metro Detroit Gaming Market”) is primarily a “drive-to” gaming market, with over 95% of our patrons residing within 100 miles of Greektown Casino.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, Greektown Casino generated $331.6 million in net revenues and a net loss of $65.9 million (including $28.7 million in reorganization expenses, $6.2 million in success fees payable to The Fine Point Group (“Fine Point”), and a $16.6 million Settlement Payment (as defined below) to the City of Detroit, as discussed in Item 2—“Financial Information—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”).

We generate cash flow from our casino operations, inclusive of our slot machine and table game businesses, as well as from our food and beverage operations and hotel operations. For the year ended December 31, 2009, revenues from our slot machine-based business accounted for 87.3% of revenues from our casino operations, and revenues from our casino operations accounted for 90.4% of our total revenues. For additional financial information relating to our business please see: “Item 13—“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Marketing

In general, we market to patrons based on a value-oriented brand positioning. Central to this brand platform is the promise to offer our customers more for their money. From our $9.99 lunch buffet, to inexpensive hotel room rates, to aggressive promotions, which give players more ways to play, win and have fun, Greektown is focused on continuing to find ways to provide customers with the ability to have fun at a reasonable cost.

Our marketing efforts historically have been focused on the drive-in and bus markets. With the addition of our 400 room hotel, we have been able to extend and enhance the local gamers’ experience by providing our customers with hotel discounts and complimentaries, or “comps.”

Competition

The Detroit Commercial Casinos are the only three commercial casinos in Michigan and consist of Greektown Casino, MGM Grand Detroit (“MGM Detroit”) and MotorCity Casino (“MotorCity”). An additional competitor, Caesars Windsor, is located across the Detroit River in Canada. Caesars Windsor is owned by the Ontario government and is accessible from Detroit via bridge or tunnel. Collectively, the three Detroit Commercial Casinos and Caesars Windsor make up the Metro Detroit Gaming Market.

The gaming market in the state of Michigan, which contains both commercial and tribal casinos, consists of the Detroit Commercial Casinos and twenty Native American-owned gaming facilities that operate under compacts. Five racetracks are also located in Michigan, each of which offer horse betting, but are not authorized to offer slot machine or table gaming. There is also a racetrack in Windsor that operates over 750 slot machines.

Overview of direct competition

The direct competitors of Greektown Casino are the two other Detroit Commercial Casinos. The Detroit Commercial Casinos operate as commercial entities under the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act (the “Michigan Gaming Act”). The Detroit Commercial Casinos are licensed to offer both slot machines and table games, with no specific limit on the number of gaming positions that they may operate within their authorized gaming square footage. MGM Detroit, MotorCity and Caesars Windsor may each have greater name recognition and financial, marketing and other resources than Greektown Casino. For instance, MGM Detroit benefits from the use of a national player database. Caesars Windsor is managed by a consortium that includes Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. and Hilton Hotels Corporation, both of which have a national presence. By comparison, we have the area’s most recently completed casino hotel complex, catering specifically to a budget-minded consumer base that we believe would not otherwise be served by our primary competitors. We believe that this should uniquely position us in a market experiencing a significant

6

economic downturn that has affected both the Detroit metropolitan area and the United States as a whole.

MGM Detroit, MotorCity and Greektown Casino accounted for 40.9%, 33.3% and 25.8% of the total adjusted gross gaming revenues of the Detroit Commercial Casinos, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Below is a more detailed summary of the gaming amenities offered by MGM Detroit, MotorCity and Caesars Windsor.

MGM Detroit.MGM Detroit was the first casino to open in Detroit, in July 1999, and since 2001 has generally been the market leader based on share of adjusted gross gaming revenues. In October 2007, MGM Detroit completed construction of a new, permanent casino. The new facility houses approximately 100,000 square feet of gaming space with an estimated 4,090 slot machines and 97 table games, 400 hotel rooms, 11 restaurants/bars and five entertainment venues. The property also offers a 30,000-square-foot meeting facility, which includes a 14,000-square-foot ballroom. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, MGM Detroit’s adjusted gross casino revenues were $547.6 million, representing a 5.3% decline over the comparable period in the prior year. MGM Mirage owns a controlling interest in MGM Detroit, with the remaining interest held by Detroit Partners, LLC, a group of local residents and businesses. MGM Detroit benefits from the use of a national player database.

MotorCity.MotorCity was the second casino to open in Detroit, in December 1999, and since 2001 has generally maintained a second-place market position based on share of adjusted gross gaming revenues behind MGM Detroit. In 2008, MotorCity completed its expanded complex. The renovated facility has 100,000 square feet of gaming space with an estimated 2,850 slot machines and 57 table games, 6 restaurants/bars, two entertainment venues, a 400 room hotel and a 1,500 seat theater. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, MotorCity’s adjusted gross casino revenues were $445.8 million, representing a 4.1% decline over the comparable period in the prior year. The facility is privately owned by its sole stockholder, Marian Ilitch.

Caesars Windsor.Caesars Windsor opened in May 1994. Caesars Windsor is the largest casino-resort in Canada and is owned by the government of Ontario and operated by a consortium that includes Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. and Hilton Hotels Corporation. At its peak in the late 1990s, the casino attracted in excess of six million visitors annually. In 2008, Caesars Windsor completed an expansion of its casino costing approximately CAD $400 million, which resulted in a complex of approximately 100,000 square feet of gaming space, 85 table games, 2,550 slot machines and 3,000 parking spaces. Caesars Windsor also offers 758 hotel rooms, a 5,000 seat entertainment center and approximately 100,000 square feet of convention space. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, Caesars Windsor’s adjusted gross gaming revenues were CAD $288.8 million, representing a slight decrease from the prior year.

Michigan tribal gaming

Twenty Native American-owned casinos are currently operating in western, central and northern Michigan, the closest of which is 113 miles from Greektown Casino. A number of additional Native American casinos are in various stages of the planning process:

• A tribe has entered into a land settlement agreement with the State of Michigan and is currently seeking U.S. Congressional approval to construct a casino in Monroe County, Flint or Romulus, which would be within 20 to 75 miles of Greektown Casino.

• Another tribe has also entered into a land settlement agreement with the State of Michigan and is currently seeking U.S. Congressional approval for a casino in Port Huron, which would be within 75 miles of Greektown Casino.

• Another tribe re-submitted an application in October 2009 to the U.S. Department of the Interior to construct a $300 million casino development, including a 200 room hotel and retail space, in Romulus, Michigan after having a previous application dismissed in 2008. The proposed development would be within 20 miles of Greektown Casino.

7

• Another tribe has publicly announced an agreement with the governor of the State of Michigan to amend an existing compact. The amendments to the compact would allow the tribe to seek to place land in trust with the United States Department of Interior to construct a new casino in western Michigan. Certain proposed amendments to the compact must be approved by the Michigan Legislature and the tribe must submit an application to the United States Department of Interior to place certain land in trust in order to construct the casino in western Michigan.

The opening of additional Native American-owned casinos near Detroit or elsewhere in Michigan could have a detrimental effect on Greektown Casino’s casino revenues.

Proposal 1

In November 2004, Michigan voters passed Proposal 1, which requires a voter referendum before new forms of gambling are permitted in Michigan. This limits the government’s ability to enact changes to state laws permitting incremental forms of gaming in Michigan. Proposal 1 does not apply to tribal gaming or to the Detroit Commercial Casinos, but applies to new lottery games, consisting of table games and player-operated mechanical or electronic devices or other forms of gaming or additional casinos.

Lottery

We also compete with the State of Michigan Lottery, which offers a variety of lottery tickets and drawings. Additionally, the Bureau of State Lottery oversees and licenses charitable gaming by nonprofit organizations throughout the state. In 2004, Michigan also introduced new “Club Games,” including keno and various pull-tab games, in licensed bars and restaurants.

Other Competition

We also compete, to some extent, with other forms of gaming on both a local and national level, including state-sponsored lotteries, Internet gaming, on- and off-track wagering and card parlors. The expansion of legalized gaming to new jurisdictions throughout the United States has also increased competition and will continue to do so in the future. On November 3, 2009, a casino initiative passed in Ohio authorizing casino-style gaming at four locations in the state: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus and Toledo. Although casinos will not be constructed and open for business for some time, we anticipate that they will compete with the Detroit Casinos, particularly the Toledo casino, which is in close proximity to Detroit and southern Michigan. If gaming facilities in our markets were purchased by entities with more recognized brand names or larger capital resources, or if gaming were legalized in jurisdictions near Greektown Casino where gaming currently is not permitted, we would face additional competition.

Potential Competition

Two initiative petitions to amend the Michigan Constitution have been approved as to form by the board of state canvassers and are being circulated for signatures for potential placement on the November 2, 2010 ballot. The first petition is being sponsored by a group called Racing to Save Michigan, which would amend the state constitution to allow the MGCB to issue state casino licenses to up to eight new casinos in Michigan, five of which would be located at horse tracks that conducted race meetings with pari-mutuel wagering in 2009. The second petition is being sponsored by a group called Michigan is Yours, and would amend the state constitution to authorize casino gaming at no more than seven casinos located in Muskegon, Lansing, Detroit, Detroit/Wayne County Metropolitan Airport, Benton Harbor, Flint and Romulus. In order to be placed on the ballot in November 2010, the proponents will have to collect at least 380,126 signatures by July 5, 2010.

8

Employees and Unions

As of December 31, 2009, we employed approximately 2,140 people, of which approximately 1,800 are full-time employees, across various functional areas. Approximately 77% of our workforce was unionized as of December 31, 2009. Our unionized employees are members of two union groups: (i) the Detroit Casino Council (the “DCC”), which is made up of five unions, the UAW, HERE, Teamsters, Carpenters and Operating Engineers, and (ii) the International Union, Security, Police, Fire Professionals of America (the “SPFPA”), which consists of security personnel. The collective bargaining agreements for the DCC and the SPFPA are effective until October 16, 2011 and June 12, 2012, respectively. We consider our relationships with our employees and the labor unions to be good.

Business Seasonality

Our gaming operations are affected by the weather. We have experienced downturns in customer volume during the summer months and increases in volume during winter months, although we do experience lower volume during severe winter storms. These seasonal and adverse weather conditions in the Detroit metropolitan area may discourage potential customers from visiting us. We believe we have also experienced downturns in customer volume as a consequence of nearby road repairs and construction, which generally occur in the spring, summer and fall, as well as during various sporting or entertainment events in downtown Detroit.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to federal, state and local environmental, safety and health laws, regulations and ordinances that apply to non-gaming businesses generally, such as the Clear Air Act, Clean Water Act, Occupational Safety and Health Act, Oil Pollution Act, Resource Conservation Recovery Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. We have not made, and do not anticipate making, material expenditures with respect to these environmental laws, regulations and ordinances. However, the attendant compliance costs associated with them may result in future additional costs to our operations.

Intellectual Property

We believe it is important to protect our significant trademarks and service marks by registering them for use in connection with the underlying goods and services, as appropriate at the federal or state level. The trademarks “GREEKTOWN CASINO,” “GREEKTOWN CASINO (& DESIGN),” “LET THE PARTY BEGIN AT GREEKTOWN!,” GREEKTOWN CASINO-HOTEL” and “CLUB GREEKTOWN” are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The restaurant and bar trademarks “THE ALLEY GRILLE STEAKHOUSE,” “APOLLO,” “ECLIPZ,” “GRAPEVINE CAFÉ,” “OUZO’S,” “OPA! BAR,” “GALLERIA BAR,” “SHADES LOUNGE,” “BISTRO 555,” “TRAPPER’S PATIO,” “TRAPPER’S SNACK BAR,” “INTERNATIONAL BUFFET” and “THE OLIVE ROOM” are registered with the State of Michigan. Finally, the advertising marks “AMAZING RACE SLOTS & TABLE GAMES,” “BONU$ PLAY,” BONU$ BUCKS,” “BONU$ BET,” “DETROIT’S WINNING ADDRESS” and “THE NEW GREEKTOWN CASINO-HOTEL—A KEWADIN CASINO” are registered with the State of Michigan.

Government Regulation

The ownership and operation of our gaming facility is subject to various state and local laws and regulations in the jurisdiction in which we are located. We are subject to the provisions of the Michigan Gaming Act and rules promulgated thereunder (the “Michigan Rules”), the MGCB, including the MGCB rules (the “MGCB Rules”) and MGCB orders and resolutions (“MGCB Orders and Resolutions”) and various local ordinances and regulations, and are subject to the regulatory control of the MGCB, the City of Detroit and the Michigan Liquor Control Commission. Additionally, we must comply with a variety of federal regulations relating to, among other things, the reporting of certain cash transactions.

9

The following is a summary of the provisions of the material laws and regulations applicable to our gaming operations and other laws and regulations applicable to us. The summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the appropriate laws and regulations.

Michigan Gaming Regulation

Greektown LLC is licensed to operate in Michigan pursuant to the Michigan Gaming Act. The Michigan Gaming Act and Michigan Rules subject the ownership and operation of commercial casino gaming facilities to extensive state licensing and regulatory requirements and require the licensee to have a development agreement in effect with the City of Detroit and the Economic Development Corporation (“Detroit EDC”) of the City of Detroit.

The Michigan Gaming Act created the MGCB and authorizes it to grant casino licenses to not more than three applicants that have entered into development agreements with the City of Detroit. The MGCB is granted extensive authority to conduct background investigations and determine the suitability and eligibility of casino license applicants, affiliated companies, officers, directors and managerial employees of applicants and affiliated companies, persons and entities holding a one percent or greater direct or indirect interest in an applicant or affiliated company, and anyone else the MGCB deems to be a “qualifier.” The Michigan Gaming Act and Michigan Rules restrict direct communication with the MGCB members.

Any person who supplies goods or services to a casino licensee that are directly related to, used in connection with or affect gaming must obtain a supplier’s license from the MGCB. Any person who supplies other goods or services of a non-gaming nature to a casino licensee on a regular and continuing basis must also obtain a supplier’s license from the MGCB or demonstrate eligibility for an exemption from this requirement. In addition, any individual employed by a casino licensee, or by a supplier licensee whose work duties are related to or involved in the gambling operation or are performed in a restricted area or gaming area of a casino, or who hold certain other positions, must obtain an occupational license from the MGCB. The MGCB Rules permit the MGCB to exempt any person or field of commerce from the supplier licensing requirements. The MGCB has adopted the MGCB Orders and Resolutions that outline the process for persons and entities to apply to be exempt from supplier licensing requirements.

The Michigan Gaming Act imposes the burden of proof on the applicant for a casino license to establish its suitability to receive and hold the license. The applicant must establish its suitability as to:

• integrity;

• moral character and reputation;

• business probity;

• financial ability and experience;

• responsibility; and

• other criteria deemed appropriate by the MGCB.

The Michigan Rules and Michigan Gaming Act provide systems for administrative and judicial review of various decisions of the MGCB. These appeals are governed by the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act of 1969.

The MGCB may refuse to renew a license upon a determination that the licensee no longer meets the requirements for licensure. In addition to restriction, suspension or revocation of a casino license, the MGCB may impose substantial fines or forfeiture of assets upon licensees for violation of gaming or liquor laws or rules or other violations of law. The Michigan Rules provide for an appeal process from decisions made by the MGCB concerning violations outlined above. These appeals are governed by the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act of 1969.

The Michigan Gaming Act includes provisions that restrict certain casino owners and managers, along with supplier licensees and their key managers, from giving political contributions to Michigan

10

elected officials. The Michigan Gaming Act and Michigan Rules also restrict gift giving to state-elected officials and certain key employed state officials. The MGCB has adopted the MGCB Orders and Resolutions that establish criteria through which a supplier license applicant who has made political contributions during the application period may be granted waivers to reapply for licensing.

The Michigan Gaming Act and Michigan Rules provide for annual license renewal as long as the MGCB determines that the casino licensee continues to meet the requirements established by the Michigan Gaming Act and Michigan Rules. Greektown LLC’s original license was issued on November 10, 2000. Greektown LLC is currently in compliance in all material respects with such requirements of the MGCB and has made all necessary license renewal payments. The license was last renewed on December 11, 2007 and its renewal is currently held in abeyance by the MGCB pending our bankruptcy reorganization but remains valid and in effect in the interim.

The Michigan Rules implement the terms of the Michigan Gaming Act. Among other things, the Michigan Rules outline more detailed substantive and procedural requirements with respect to casino licensing and operations, including, but not limited to, requirements regarding things such as licensing investigations and hearings, record keeping and retention, contracting, reports to the MGCB, internal control and accounting procedures, security and surveillance operations, extension of credit to gaming patrons, conduct of gaming and transfers of ownership interests in licensed casinos. The Michigan Rules also establish numerous MGCB procedures regarding licensing, disciplinary and other hearings and similar matters. The Michigan Rules have the force of law and are binding on the MGCB as well as on applicants for or holders of casino licenses, their vendors and employees. The Michigan Rules prohibit a casino licensee or a holding company or affiliate that has control of a casino licensee in Michigan from entering into a debt transaction affecting the capitalization or financial viability of its Michigan casino operation without prior approval from the MGCB. The Michigan Rules outline requirements and procedures for casino licensees or holding companies that make a public offering of debt or equity.

In June 2006 and December 2007, Greektown LLC entered into Acknowledgements of Violation (the “AOVs”) with the MGCB. The June 2006 AOV related to certain amendments to Greektown LLC’s indebtedness agreements that reflected changes that were not reviewed by the MGCB, and the December 2007 AOV included four complaints addressing procurement, kiosks, electronic device meters and signage. Under the terms of the AOVs, aggregate fines of $1.05 million were assessed, of which $400,000 was paid upon entering into the AOVs and $750,000 would not be an obligation unless Greektown LLC commits further violations of the same legal requirements with respect to the June 2006 AOV before June 13, 2011 and with respect to the December 2007 AOV before December 3, 2010. Other than the initial penalties of $400,000, no further amounts have been paid as no violations occurred during 2008 or 2009. However, we cannot be certain whether we will have future violations and if we do, we may be subject to the additional penalties from MGCB described above and other penalties.

The Michigan Liquor Control Commission licenses, controls and regulates the sale of alcoholic beverages pursuant to the Michigan Liquor Control Act. The Michigan Gaming Act also requires that casinos sell and distribute alcoholic beverages in conformity with the Michigan Liquor Control Act. The City of Detroit also issues certain approvals in connection with the sale of alcoholic beverages.

Michigan Gaming Taxation and Fees

Under the provisions of the Michigan Gaming Act, we must pay a combined state and city wagering tax equal to 19% of adjusted gross receipts (which was recently reduced from 24%, retroactively to February 15, 2009), payable daily, a municipal services fee in an amount equal to the greater of 1.25% of adjusted gross receipts or $4.0 million annually. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we paid gaming taxes of $75.6 million, $83.1 million and $89.6 million, respectively. These gaming taxes are included in Greektown Casino’s operating expenses. In addition to gaming taxes, we are required to make an annual payment for certain costs of the MGCB not to exceed one-third of an annual maximum amount, adjusted annually for inflation, that

11

is currently set at approximately $10.2 million. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 we paid fees to the MGCB of $10.2 million, $10.0 million and $9.8 million, respectively. These MGCB fees are included in Greektown Casino’s general and administrative expenses. These gaming taxes and fees are in addition to the taxes, fees and assessments customarily paid by business entities conducting business in Michigan and Detroit.

If the Michigan Lottery Act is amended to allow casino operations and if casino operations are conducted at racetracks in Michigan, the state wagering tax rate will be reduced to 18%. Any amendment would require voter approval, as mandated by Proposal 1. As discussed above, two options to amend the Michigan state constitution to authorize additional casino gaming in Michigan have been approved and are being circulated for signature. If enough signatures are obtained, they would be placed on the November 2010 ballot.

Pursuant to the Michigan Gaming Act, once we had 400 fully operational hotel rooms operating for 30 consecutive days and we were otherwise in compliance with the development agreement, we would be eligible for a reduction in the combined state and city wagering tax rate from 24% to 19% of our adjusted gross receipts (the “Tax Rollback”). MGM Detroit and MotorCity had received the Tax Rollback prior to 2010. On February 15, 2009, we opened our hotel including 400 guest rooms to the public. We contended that we were eligible for the Tax Rollback as of February 15, 2009. The City of Detroit had objected to our eligibility based on its contention that we were not in compliance with the Revised Development Agreement Greektown LLC entered into with the City of Detroit and the Detroit EDC on August 2, 2002 (the “Development Agreement”). Various litigation ensued with the City of Detroit in connection with these disputes. On October 9, 2009, the Debtors filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court to approve an amended settlement agreement (the “Amended Settlement Agreement”) with the City of Detroit. The Bankruptcy Court approved the Amended Settlement Agreement on February 22, 2010, which provides for a resolution of all disputes with the City of Detroit. The Amended Settlement Agreement was conditioned upon (i) approval of the Amended Settlement Agreement by the Bankruptcy Court, which was obtained on February 22, 2010; and (ii) final approvals of the Amended Settlement Agreement from various offices of the City of Detroit, which were obtained on February 24, 2010.

The Amended Settlement Agreement provides, among other things, that:

• the City of Detroit is required to use its best efforts to support the Debtors efforts in obtaining the Tax Rollback effective as of February 15, 2009 before the MGCB (which was subsequently obtained on March 9, 2010);

• the Debtors are required to pay the City of Detroit a settlement amount in the aggregate of $16.6 million (the “Settlement Payment”), less certain credits described below, subject to the following provisions: (i) the Debtor is required to pay an initial cash payment of $3.5 million (the “Initial Cash Payment”) within two business days after entry of an order by the Bankruptcy Court approving the Amended Settlement Agreement; (ii) a credit is required to be applied immediately to reduce the Settlement Payment in an amount equal $3.5 million (the “Settlement Credit”), representing the difference between (a) the amount of gaming taxes actually paid to the City of Detroit between February 15, 2009 and February 15, 2010 and (b) the amount of gaming taxes that would have been paid through the date of the settlement to the City of Detroit had the Tax Rollback been effective as of February 15, 2009); and (iii) the Debtors are required to pay a final cash amount of $9.6 million (“Final Cash Payment”), which is the remaining amount of the Settlement Payment after the Initial Cash Payment and the application of the Settlement Credit described above. The Settlement Credit has been applied and the Initial Cash Payment was made to the City of Detroit by the Debtors on February 24, 2010;

• to the extent the board of directors of Greektown LLC does not contain at least one director from Detroit reasonably acceptable to the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Detroit, Greektown LLC is required to appoint an unpaid ombudsman, to be selected by the Mayor and approved by the City Council of the City of Detroit, who is reasonably acceptable to the Debtors who will be entitled to attend board meetings, including board committee meetings,

12

	and receive all material information furnished to the board, subject to a confidentiality agreement and certain exceptions;
•	upon the receipt of the Final Cash Payment, the City of Detroit is deemed to have dismissed and waived any and all claims of default under the Development Agreement;
•	the City of Detroit is required to cease its demand for a 1% tax increase due to the delayed completion of the Expanded Complex;
•	the City of Detroit is required to consent to the transfer of the ownership of the Greektown Casino and the Development Agreement to the Reorganized Debtors in accordance with the Plan; and
•	the City of Detroit is required to take actions to dismiss all related litigation.

On March 9, 2010, the MGCB entered an order certifying that Greektown LLC met the requirements and was entitled to a tax adjustment retroactive to February 15, 2009. The effects of the retroactive adjustment are to reduce the Settlement Payment to $13.1 million after application of the Settlement Credit described above. As a result of the MGCB order, commencing on February 15, 2009, our combined state and city wagering tax rate is 19% of our adjusted gross receipts, reflecting the Tax Rollback.

City of Detroit Regulation

The Detroit City Council has enacted several ordinances affecting the Detroit Commercial Casinos. One, entitled “Casino Gaming Authorization and Casino Development Agreement Certification and Compliance,” authorizes casino gaming only by operators who are licensed by the MGCB and are parties to a development agreement that has been approved and certified by the City Council and is currently in effect, or are acting on behalf of parties to a development agreement. The Development Agreement has been so approved and certified and is currently in effect. The ordinance requires each casino operator to submit to the Mayor of Detroit and to the Detroit City Council annual reports regarding the operator’s compliance with its development agreement or, in the event of non-compliance, reasons for non-compliance and an explanation of efforts to comply. The ordinance requires the Mayor of Detroit to monitor each casino operator’s compliance with its development agreement, to take appropriate enforcement action in the event of default and to notify the Detroit City Council of defaults and enforcement action taken; and, if a development agreement is terminated, it requires the Detroit City Council to transmit notice of enforcement action to the MGCB within five business days along with the City of Detroit’s request that the MGCB revoke the relevant operator’s certificate of suitability or casino license. If a development agreement is terminated, the Michigan Gaming Act requires the MGCB to revoke the relevant operator’s casino license upon the request of the City of Detroit.

City of Detroit Development Agreement

In March 1998, Greektown LLC entered into the initial development agreement with the City of Detroit and the Detroit EDC. In August 2002, Greektown LLC entered into the Development Agreement, which amended and restated the initial development agreement and authorized the construction and operation of the existing casino.

From March 1998 through December 31, 2009, the City of Detroit has been paid approximately $128.2 million under the terms of the Development Agreement.

In addition to gaming taxes, we are also obligated to pay 1% of our adjusted gross receipts to the City of Detroit, to be increased to 2% of our adjusted gross receipts in any calendar year in which adjusted gross receipts exceed $400 million, beginning on the day our adjusted gross receipts exceed $400 million and continuing until the end of that calendar year. In addition, when adjusted gross receipts exceed $400 million, we would be required to pay $4.0 million to the City of Detroit. We do not anticipate exceeding the $400 million in adjusted gross receipts for the calendar year ending December 31, 2010.

13

We also must pay certain legal and consultant expenses incurred by the City of Detroit related to the development of the casino complex.

The Development Agreement includes a number of additional provisions with which we must comply. The key provisions include those listed below:

• A radius restriction prohibiting various parties from holding an interest in or taking certain actions regarding any other casino within a 150-mile radius from central Detroit.

• Various indemnification obligations for certain judgments, fines, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, expenses, claims, obligations and penalties of the City of Detroit, the Detroit EDC and each of their respective officers, agents and employees.

• Various social commitments regarding, for example, employment of Detroit residents, procurement of financing and goods and services from Detroit-based businesses, Detroit resident businesses and business concerns and/or minority- or women-owned businesses.

• Transfer of ownership restrictions prohibiting certain direct and indirect owners of Greektown LLC from transferring their equity interests without the consent of the City of Detroit.

U.S. Department of the Treasury Regulations

The U.S. Internal Revenue Code and the U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder require operators of casinos located in the United States to file information returns for U.S. citizens, including, but not limited to, names, addresses and social security numbers of winners, for bingo and slot machine winnings in excess of prescribed amounts and keno winnings in which the payout equals or exceeds a specified amount more than the amount wagered. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code and the U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder also require operators to withhold taxes on some keno, bingo and slot machine winnings of nonresident aliens. We are unable to predict the extent to which these requirements, if extended, might impede or otherwise adversely affect operations of, and/or income from, these and/or other games.

Regulations adopted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the MGCB require the reporting of patron’s currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day, including identification of the patron by name and social security number, which regulations were subsequently modified to include a suspicious activity reporting rule. Casinos are required to report suspicious monetary transactions when the casino knows, suspects or has reason to suspect that the transaction involves funds derived from illegal activity or is otherwise intended to facilitate illegal activity.

U.S.A. Patriot Act

The U.S.A. Patriot Act permits financial institutions, upon providing notice to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, to share information with one another to identify and report to the federal government any activities that may involve money laundering or terrorist activity.

Other Laws and Regulations

Our operations are also subject to extensive state and local regulations in addition to the regulations described above, and, on a periodic basis, we must obtain various other licenses and permits, including those required to sell alcoholic beverages.

Available Information

Our website address is www.greektowncasino.com. Through this website, our filings with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, will be accessible (free of charge) as soon as reasonably practicable after materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information provided on our website is not part of this registration statement.

14

You also may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Business

There are significant issues remaining with respect to the satisfaction of the conditions to our ability to emerge from bankruptcy protection pursuant to the Plan.

The effectiveness of the Plan is conditioned on, among other things, the receipt of all required authorizations, consents and regulatory approvals, including those from the City of Detroit and the MGCB, the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions precedent in the documents governing the Exit Financing and the actions, documents and agreements necessary to implement the Plan being satisfactory in form and substance to the Put Parties prior to the Effective Date. Since the Plan was confirmed, we have focused our efforts on satisfying such conditions. Although progress has been made, significant issues remain to be resolved, including with respect to the Revolving Loan and the MGCB’s approval of the Plan. No assurance can be given that the Revolving Loan will be obtained, the New Senior Secured Notes and the sale of Preferred Stock in the Rights Offering will be consummated or that we will receive MGCB approval, and as such, no assurance can be given that the Plan will become effective.

We face significant competition in the market in which we operate and other markets, which could impair our revenues, increase our expenses and hinder our ability to generate sufficient cash flows.

We face significant competition principally from two other casinos in Detroit, MGM Detroit and MotorCity, as well as Caesars Windsor, which is located directly across the Detroit River from Detroit. MGM Detroit, MotorCity and Caesars Windsor may each have greater name recognition and financial, marketing and other resources than we do, and all three casinos completed major renovations/expansion projects in the past few years that have the potential to greatly increase their respective market share of the Metro Detroit Gaming Market. MGM Detroit and MotorCity accounted for 40.9% and 33.3% of the total adjusted gross gaming revenues of the Detroit Commercial Casinos for 2009, respectively. Competition may increase among the Detroit Commercial Casinos because the Metro Detroit Gaming Market experienced its first overall gross gaming revenue decline in 2009 of 1.5% compared to 2008.

In addition, we compete with other gaming facilities throughout Michigan and surrounding states as well as nationwide, including casinos located on Native American reservations and other land-based casinos. Twenty Native American-owned casinos are currently operating in western, central and northern Michigan, the closest of which is 113 miles from Greektown. Furthermore, two tribes have entered into land settlement agreements with the State of Michigan, and both tribes are currently seeking U.S. Congressional approval of the agreements to take the land into trust for new land-based casinos. One tribe is seeking to locate a casino in Michigan in one of Monroe County, Flint or Romulus, while the other tribe is seeking to locate a casino in Port Huron, and both proposed casinos would be within 20-75 miles of Greektown Casino. No U.S. Congressional approval has yet been obtained. Also, another tribe has been federally recognized and is seeking to enter into a compact with the State of Michigan for a casino in western Michigan, and an additional tribe has indicated that it intends to apply to the Bureau of Indian Affairs for trust status for a site in Romulus. Michigan also features five racetracks which offer horse betting but are not authorized to offer slot machines or table gaming, and there is an additional racetrack in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, which has over 750 slot machines. Furthermore, two initiative petitions to amend the Michigan Constitution have been approved as to form by the board of state canvassers and are being circulated for signatures for potential placement on the November 2, 2010 ballot. In the event

15

that the proposed amendments are included on the ballot and approved, additional casinos will be built near Greektown Casino, which could have a significant adverse effect on our business.

We also compete, to some extent, with other forms of gaming on both a local and national level, including state-sponsored lotteries, Internet gaming, on- and off-track wagering and card parlors. The expansion of legalized gaming to new jurisdictions throughout the United States also has increased competition faced by us and will continue to do so in the future. Additionally, if gaming facilities in our markets were purchased by entities with more recognized brand names and capital, or if gaming were legalized in jurisdictions near our property where gaming currently is not permitted, as, for example, happened in Ohio in 2009, we would face additional competition.

Certain contingent claims against the Debtors in bankruptcy remain outstanding and additional claims may be filed and are subject to adjustment before we are able to satisfy such claims.

A number of contingent claims were filed against the Debtors in their bankruptcy proceedings. In addition, the deadline to file administrative claims, professional claims and substantial contribution claims has not yet occurred and will not occur until after the Effective Date as provided in the Plan and confirmation order. We plan to satisfy allowed claims as we emerge from bankruptcy pursuant to the Plan. However, some of these claims may be filed and/or allowed in amounts greater than anticipated, which would reduce the amount of capital that we will have after emergence to operate and conduct our business. Such claims may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Given that our operations are dependent upon one property for all of our cash flows, we are subject to greater risks, many of which are beyond our control, than a gaming company with more operating properties.

We do not currently have operations other than Greektown Casino, and therefore, we are entirely dependent upon Greektown Casino, and dependent upon the patronage of persons living in and visiting the Detroit metropolitan area, for our revenues and cash flows. Because we are entirely dependent on a single gaming site, we are subject to greater risks than a geographically diversified gaming operation, including, but not limited to:

• risks related to the economic conditions in southeastern Michigan or nearby regions, including a loss of residents, layoffs, increased fuel and transportation costs or a decrease in discretionary income or spending;

• a decline in the size of the local gaming market;

• an increase in gaming competition in the surrounding area;

• changes in local and state governmental laws and regulations;

• damage or interruption of gaming activities by fire, flood, power loss, technology failure, break-ins, terrorist attacks, war or similar events;

• the relative popularity of local and regional entertainment alternatives to casino gaming that compete for the leisure dollar;

• adverse weather conditions, which could deter customer visits; and

• inaccessibility to the property due to road construction or closures of primary access routes.

The occurrence of any one of the events described above could cause a material disruption in our business.

Reductions in discretionary consumer spending as a result of downturns in the general economy and particular difficulties in the automobile industry had, and could continue to have, a material adverse effect on our business.

Our business has been and may continue to be adversely affected by the economic downturn currently being experienced in the United States, and more particularly in the Detroit metropolitan area, as we are highly dependent on discretionary spending by our patrons. Changes in discretionary consumer spending or consumer preferences brought about by factors such as increased unemployment, perceived or actual deterioration in general economic conditions, the current housing market crisis, the current credit crisis, bank failures and the potential for additional bank failures,

16

perceived or actual decline in disposable consumer income and wealth, the recent global economic recession and changes in consumer confidence in the economy may continue to reduce customer demand for the leisure activities we offer and may adversely affect our revenues and operating cash flow. More specifically, the economic downturn has impacted the automobile industry in the United States as much as, if not more than, other similarly situated sectors of the U.S. economy. As many of the manufacturers of automobiles and automobile parts and components are based in Detroit or the Detroit metropolitan area, our geographic location makes us uniquely susceptible to continuing volatility in the American automobile industry. We are not able to predict the length or severity of the current economic condition.

Our debt agreements will contain restrictions that will limit our flexibility in operating our business.

Our New Senior Secured Notes and the Revolving Loan will contain a number of covenants that will impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us, including restrictions on our and our subsidiaries ability to, among other things:

• incur additional debt or issue certain preferred shares;

• pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of our capital stock or make other restricted payments;

• make certain investments;

• sell certain assets;

• create liens on certain assets;

• consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets;

• enter into certain transactions with our affiliates; and

• designate our subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries.

As a result of these covenants, we will be limited in the manner in which we conduct our business, and we may be unable to engage in favorable business activities or finance future operations or capital needs. The restrictions caused by such covenants could also place us at a competitive disadvantage to less leveraged competitors.

A failure to comply with the covenants contained in the New Senior Secured Notes and the Revolving Loan or other indebtedness that we may incur in the future could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In the event of any default under the New Senior Secured Notes, the Revolving Loan or other indebtedness, the lenders thereunder:

• will not be required to lend any additional amounts to us, in the case of a default under the Revolving Loan;

• could elect to declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued and unpaid interest and fees, to be due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit; or

• could require us to apply all of our available cash to repay these borrowings.

If we were unable to repay those amounts, the holders of the New Senior Secured Notes and the lenders under the Revolving Loan could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness.

If the indebtedness under the New Senior Secured Notes, the Revolving Loan or our other indebtedness were to be accelerated, there can be no assurance that our assets would be sufficient to repay such indebtedness in full.

We have significant working capital needs, and if we are unable to satisfy those needs from cash generated from our operations or indebtedness, we may not be able to meet our obligations.

We require significant amounts of working capital to operate our business. In addition to our $30 million Revolving Loan facility, we will rely on the operation of our facilities as a source of cash. If we experience a significant and sustained drop in operating profits, or if there are unanticipated reductions in cash inflows or increases in cash outlays, we may be subject to cash

17

shortfalls. If such a shortfall were to occur for even a brief period of time, it may have a significant adverse effect on our business. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or that we will be able to draw under our Revolving Loan or otherwise, in an amount sufficient to fund our liquidity needs.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness, and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness that may not be successful.

Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations will depend upon, among other things:

• our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control; and

• our future ability to borrow under the Revolving Loan, the availability of which depends on, among other things, our complying with the covenants in the New Senior Secured Notes and the Revolving Loan.

If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to service our indebtedness, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness, including the New Senior Secured Notes. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements may restrict us from adopting some of these alternatives. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions for fair market value or at all. Furthermore, any proceeds that we could realize from any such dispositions may not be adequate to meet our debt service obligations when due. The holders of the New Senior Secured Notes and the lenders under the Revolving Loan have no continuing obligation to provide us with additional debt or equity financing.

The Plan may cause us to be subject to significant federal, state, local and other taxes and the taxes actually payable may exceed the amount of applicable reserves.

The income taxation of Greektown under federal law and laws of the state of Michigan in connection with the Plan will depend upon, among other things, the precise structure and implementation of the Plan. We may have significant tax liabilities by reason of the restructuring transactions, and also by reason of our holding structure. Greektown Holdings is subject to the Michigan Business Tax, and, it is possible that significant amounts of state taxes may be owed by Greektown with respect to the Plan. Any such tax liabilities could have material adverse financial consequences to Greektown, as well as holders of Common and Preferred Stock. Holders of Common and Preferred Stock should consider the potential state tax consequences of the Plan.

In addition, significant judgment is required to determine our provision for our reserves for state taxes. There may be matters for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Although we believe our approach to determining the tax treatment in connection with the Plan is appropriate, no assurance can be given that the final tax authority review will not be materially different than that reflected in our tax reserves. Such differences could have a material adverse effect on our tax reserves in the period in which such determination is made and, if taxes in excess of such reserves are ultimately payable, on our results of operations for such period.

Our operations are highly taxed and may be subject to higher taxes in the future, which could adversely impact our profitability.

In virtually all gaming jurisdictions, state and local governments raise considerable revenues from taxes based on casino revenues and operations. We believe that the prospect of significant additional tax revenue is one of the primary reasons why Michigan and other jurisdictions have legalized gaming. We also pay property taxes, payroll taxes, franchise taxes and income taxes.

18

Our profitability depends on generating enough revenues to pay regulatory fees and gaming taxes and other mostly variable expenses, such as payroll and marketing, as well as mostly fixed expenses such as our property taxes and interest expense. From time to time, state and local governments have increased gaming taxes, and gaming tax increases can significantly impact the profitability of gaming operations. For example, the Michigan legislature increased the aggregate state and city wagering taxes from 18% to 24% of gross gaming revenues effective September 1, 2004. Future changes in the Michigan gaming tax rates that will have a negative impact on our profitability may occur.

The federal government has also previously considered a federal tax on casino revenues and may again consider a federal tax on casino revenues in the future. Any material increase in or the adoption of additional taxes or fees could have a material adverse effect on our future financial results.

Energy and fuel price increases may adversely affect our revenues and our profitability.

Our casino uses significant amounts of electricity and natural gas. Substantial increases in the cost of electricity will negatively affect our results of operations. In addition, energy and fuel price increases in cities that constitute a significant source of customers for our properties could result in a decline in disposable income of potential customers and a corresponding decrease in visitation to our properties, which would negatively impact our revenues. The extent of the impact is subject to the magnitude and duration of the energy and fuel price increases, but this impact could be material to our results of operations.

Extensive government regulation materially impacts our operations, and any new gaming laws or regulations may adversely impact our operations.

The ownership, management and operation of gaming facilities is subject to extensive laws, regulations and ordinances that are administered by various federal, state and local governmental entities and agencies. The MGCB has broad authority and discretion to require us and our officers, directors, managers, members, employees, vendors and holders of certain of our debt to obtain and maintain various licenses, registrations, permits, findings of suitability and other approvals. To enforce applicable gaming regulations, gaming authorities may, among other things, limit, suspend or revoke the licenses, registrations, permits, findings of suitability and any other approvals of any gaming entity, vendor or individual, and may levy fines or cause a forfeiture of assets against us or individuals for violations of gaming laws or regulations. Any of these actions would have a material adverse effect on us.

Government regulations require us to, among other things:

• pay gaming fees, assessments and taxes to the State of Michigan and the City of Detroit;

• periodically renew our gaming license in Michigan, which may be suspended or revoked if we do not meet detailed regulatory requirements;

• receive and maintain federal and state environmental approvals; and

• receive and maintain state and local licenses and permits to sell alcoholic beverages in our facilities.

We are subject to the Michigan Gaming Act and the Michigan Rules, and to local regulation by the City of Detroit. Under the Michigan Rules, we may not make a public offering of our securities or enter into a debt transaction affecting the capitalization or financial viability of our gaming operations without the prior approval of the MGCB and compliance with our Development Agreement.

Our directors, officers and most employees, and many of our vendors and their employees performing services for us, must also be approved by the MGCB. If the MGCB were to find a director, officer, employee or vendor unsuitable, we would be required to sever our relationship with that person. Although we have no reason to believe that it will happen, our existing gaming licenses, liquor licenses, registrations, findings of suitability, permits and approvals may be revoked, suspended or limited or not renewed when they expire. Any failure to renew or maintain our

19

licenses or receive new licenses when necessary would harm our business and revenues. The compliance costs associated with these laws, regulations and licenses are significant.

The casino entertainment industry is generally subject to political, legislative and regulatory uncertainty. If additional gaming laws and regulations are adopted, or if current gaming laws or regulations are modified in Michigan, any newly imposed restrictions or costs could have a significant adverse effect on us. From time to time, various proposals are introduced in the Michigan legislature that, if enacted, could adversely affect the regulatory, operational or other aspects of the gaming industry and our company. Legislation of this type may be enacted in the future that may impact our operations.

A smoking ban in casinos located in the state of Michigan or the city of Detroit could have a negative impact on our business and operations.

From time to time, individual jurisdictions have considered legislation or referendums, such as bans on smoking in casinos and other entertainment and dining facilities. Such bans have been implemented in jurisdictions in which gaming facilities are located and such bans have had a negative impact on business and operations. Although the smoking ban adopted by the state of Michigan on December 10, 2009, which will become effective May 1, 2010, exempts the casino floor of the Detroit Commercial Casinos, if a more expansive ban were implemented in the state of Michigan or the city of Detroit, such a ban could adversely impact our business and operations.

We have not evaluated our internal controls over financial reporting for purposes of compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Our accounting and other management systems and resources may not be adequately prepared to meet the financial reporting and other requirements to which they are subject. If we are unable to achieve and maintain effective internal controls, our business, financial position and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We have not previously been required to comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the internal control evaluation and certification requirements of Section 404 of that statute, and we will not be required to comply with all of those requirements until after we have been subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for a specified period of time. Accordingly, we have not determined whether or not our existing internal controls over financial reporting systems comply with Section 404. The internal control evaluation required by Section 404 will divert internal resources and will take a significant amount of time, effort and expense to complete. If it is determined that we are not in compliance with Section 404, we will be required to implement remedial procedures and re-evaluate our internal control over financial reporting. We may experience higher than anticipated operating expenses as well as higher independent auditor and consulting fees during the implementation of these changes and thereafter. Further, we may need to hire additional qualified personnel in order for us to comply with Section 404. If we are unable to implement any necessary changes effectively or efficiently, our operations, financial reporting or financial results could be adversely affected and we could obtain an adverse report on internal controls from our independent registered public accountants.

Our future financial condition and results of operations will be affected by the adoption of fresh start accounting.

As a result of the bankruptcy reorganization, we will as of the Effective Date adopt “fresh start accounting” as prescribed in accordance with the Reorganizations topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification. Accordingly, our assets and liabilities will be adjusted to fair value, and certain assets and liabilities not previously recognized in our financial statements will be recognized under fresh start accounting. Because we have not yet completed our reorganization and adopted fresh start accounting, our reported assets and liabilities at December 31, 2009 do not yet give effect to the adjustments that will result from the adoption of fresh start accounting and, as a result, will change materially. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations from and after the Effective Date will not be comparable to the financial condition and results of operations reflected in our historical consolidated financial statements.

We will be subject to all operating risks common to the hotel business, which may adversely affect our hotel occupancy and rental rates.

20

The hotel built in connection with the Expanded Complex is the first hotel at Greektown Casino. The hotel business is highly competitive and generally will be subject to greater volatility than our gaming business. Operating risks common to the hotel business could adversely affect hotel occupancy and the rates that can be charged for hotel rooms, as well as increase our operating expenses, and generally include:

• competition from existing hotels in our market and new hotels entering our market;

• reduced business and leisure travel due to energy costs and other travel expenses, or geo-political uncertainty, including terrorism;

• adverse effects of a decline in general and in local economic activity;

• adverse weather;

• the quality and performance of the managers and other staff of our hotel; and

• risks generally associated with the ownership of hotels and real estate.

MGM Detroit, MotorCity and Caesars Windsor all have hotels connected to their gaming facilities and other new hotel projects in our vicinity have recently opened. This competition may adversely affect our occupancy and rental rates.

We may be unable to retain management personnel or hire additional qualified personnel, which would impair our ability to execute our business strategy.

The Debtors’ Chief Executive Officer and General Manager for most of the duration of the chapter 11 cases were provided to them pursuant to a consulting agreement with Fine Point, dated as of December 31, 2008 and subsequently amended on January 8, 2009 (the “Fine Point Consulting Agreement”). The Fine Point Consulting Agreement expired on December 31, 2009. On February 12, 2010, the Debtors entered into a Consulting Agreement (the “WG Consulting Agreement”) with WG-Michigan LLC, an affiliate of Warner Gaming LLC (“WG-Michigan”), pursuant to which WG- Michigan provides a general manager to the Debtors. Pursuant to a management agreement to be entered into on the Effective Date between WG-Michigan and Greektown LLC (the “Warner Gaming Management Agreement”), WG-Michigan will continue to provide Greektown with a general manager and Vice President. Our other executive officers are our employees. While we will make reasonable efforts to retain our key management personnel and executive officers and maintain our relationship with Warner Gaming, all of which we view as valuable to the operations of our casino, we may not be successful in our efforts. We do not maintain any key person life insurance policies on any of our executive officers. Though we will attempt to hire and/or contract with additional qualified personnel or fill vacated positions as determined to be necessary to our operations, there can be no estimate as to the time frame it will take to complete these actions. Any delays could have a materially negative impact on our operations and financial results.

Our business and result of operations could be adversely affected by weather-related factors and seasonality.

Our results of operations may be adversely affected by weather-related and seasonal factors. Our gaming operations are affected by the weather. We have experienced downturns in customer volume during the summer months and increases in volume during winter months, although we do experience lower volume during severe winter storms. Adverse weather conditions in the Detroit metropolitan area may discourage potential customers from visiting us. We believe we have also experienced downturns in customer volume as a consequence of nearby road repairs and construction, which generally occur in the spring, summer and fall, as well as various sporting or entertainment events in downtown Detroit.

We are subject to non-gaming regulation, and any instances of non-compliance with these laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to certain federal, state and local environmental laws, regulations and ordinances that apply to non-gaming businesses generally, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Under various federal, state and

21

local laws and regulations, an owner or operator of real property may be held liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances or wastes located on its property, regardless of whether or not the present owner or operator knows of, or is responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances or wastes. In addition, if we discover any significant environmental contamination affecting any of our properties, we could face material remediation costs or additional development costs for future expansion activities. The existence or discovery of an environmental hazard on any of our property could have a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Regulations adopted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Treasury Department require us to report currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day, including identification of the patron by name and social security number. U.S. Treasury Department regulations also require us to report certain suspicious activity, including any transaction that exceeds $5,000 if we know, suspect or have reason to believe that the transaction involves funds from illegal activity or is designed to evade federal regulations or reporting requirements. Substantial penalties can be imposed against us if we fail to comply with these regulations.

We are also subject to a variety of other federal, state and local laws and regulations, including those relating to zoning, construction, land use, employment, advertising and the sale of alcoholic beverages. If we are not in compliance with these laws and regulations, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The imposition of a substantial penalty or the loss of service of a gaming facility for a significant period of time could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are or may become involved in legal or regulatory proceedings that, if adversely adjudicated or settled, could impact our financial condition.

From time to time, we are defendants in various lawsuits and gaming regulatory proceedings relating to matters incidental to our business. For example, in June 2006 and December, 2007, Greektown LLC entered into the AOVs and paid a total fine of $400,000. The nature of our business also subjects us to the risk of lawsuits filed by customers, past and present employees, competitors, business partners, Native American tribes and others in the ordinary course of business. As with all litigation, no assurance can be provided as to the outcome of these matters and in general, litigation can be expensive and time consuming. We may not be successful in the defense or prosecution of these lawsuits, which could result in settlements or damages that could significantly impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our revenues may be negatively impacted by volatility in our hold percentage. Our revenues may be further adversely affected by high-end players’ winnings.

Casino revenue is recorded as the difference between gaming wins and losses or net win from gaming activities. Net win is impacted by variations in the hold percentage (the ratio of net win to total amount wagered), or actual outcome, on our slot machines and table games and all other games we provide to our customers. We use the hold percentage as an indicator of a game’s performance against its expected outcome. Although each game generally performs within a defined statistical range of outcomes, actual outcomes may vary for any given period. The hold percentage and actual outcome on our games can be impacted by errors made by our employees, the number of games played, faults within the computer programs that operate our slot machines and the random nature of slot machine payouts. If our games perform below their expected range of outcomes, our cash flow may suffer. In addition, although not the major focus of our marketing efforts, we have selectively targeted high-end players. Should one or more of these high-end players win large sums in our casino, or should a material amount of credit extended to players not be repaid, our revenues could be adversely affected.

Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover all possible losses we could suffer, and, in the future, our insurance costs may increase significantly or we may not be able to obtain the same level of insurance coverage.

We may suffer damage to our property caused by a casualty loss (such as fire, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism), that could severely disrupt our business or subject us to claims by third

22

parties who are injured or harmed. Although we maintain insurance customary in our industry (including property, casualty, terrorism and business interruption insurance), that insurance may not be adequate or available to cover all the risks to which our business and assets may be subject. The lack of sufficient insurance for these types of acts could expose us to heavy losses if any damages occur, directly or indirectly, that could have a significant adverse impact on our operations.

We renew our insurance policies on an annual basis. If the cost of coverage becomes too high, we may need to reduce our policy limits or agree to certain exclusions from our coverage in order to reduce the premiums to an acceptable amount. Among other factors, the situation in Iraq, homeland security concerns, other catastrophic events or any change in the current U.S. statutory requirement that insurance carriers offer coverage for certain acts of terrorism could materially adversely affect available insurance coverage and result in increased premiums on available coverage (which may cause us to elect to reduce our policy limits) and additional exclusions from coverage. Among other potential future adverse changes, in the future we may elect to not, or may not be able to, obtain any coverage for losses due to acts of terrorism.

Some of our material agreements require us to maintain a certain minimum level of insurance. Failure to satisfy these requirements could result in an event of default under these agreements, which, depending on the nature of the agreement, could cause cross-defaults to other agreements, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock and Preferred Stock

There is no active trading market for shares of our Common Stock and Preferred Stock, which may make it more difficult for you to sell our Common Stock and Preferred Stock.

There is no active or liquid trading market for the shares of our Common Stock and Preferred Stock and a market may not develop, as we do not intend to apply for the Common Stock and Preferred Stock to be listed on any securities exchange or to arrange for quotation on any automated dealer quotation system. If no active or liquid trading market develops, you may not be able to sell the Common Stock and Preferred Stock at their fair market value or at all.

Because Greektown Superholdings will not control Greektown Holdings until the Effective Date, Greektown Superholdings may not be aware of all the risks related to ownership.

Greektown Superholdings is a newly-formed entity that will not control Greektown Holdings until the Effective Date. While Greektown Superholdings has been provided with access to information regarding Greektown Holdings and its subsidiaries, has conducted extensive due diligence on Greektown Holdings and will continue to review information on Greektown Holdings until the Effective Date, Greektown Superholdings may not be aware of all of the risks associated with owning all of the equity interests of Greektown Holdings as of the date of this registration statement. Any discovery of adverse information concerning Greektown Holdings after the Effective Date could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations of Greektown Superholdings.

The price certain investors are willing to pay for our equity securities and the trading market for such securities may be diminished because of Michigan’s gaming regulation laws.

The Michigan Gaming Act subjects the owners of casino gaming facilities to extensive state licensing and regulatory requirements. The MGCB is granted extensive authority to conduct background investigations and determine the suitability and eligibility of persons or entities holding a one percent or greater direct or indirect interest in an applicant for a casino license or a company affiliated with the applicant, and anyone else the MGCB deems to be a “qualifier.” In addition, for equity interests, the Gaming Act and rules establish a 5% ownership threshold for most individuals and entities and a 15% ownership threshold for Institutional Investors (as defined in the Michigan Gaming Act) that have received waivers of the Michigan Gaming Act’s eligibility and suitability requirements. Our Certificate of Incorporation (as amended by the Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation) provides that the board of directors will not have the right to cause Greektown Superholdings to issue or sell to any person (including holders of shares of capital stock and affiliates of holders of shares of capital stock) more than 5% of any Common Stock, Preferred

23

Stock or other voting securities, voting interests or equity interests of Greektown Superholdings except in accordance with the provisions of the Michigan Gaming Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. Also, any transfers of more than 5% of such equity securities in violation of the Michigan Gaming Act and the rules promulgated thereunder shall be void. As a result of these regulations, you may not be able to obtain the maximum value for your interest in our equity securities.

We have the ability to issue additional equity securities, which would lead to dilution of our existing equity interests.

Our Board has the authority to issue or sell additional equity securities or other equity securities convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities. The issuance of any additional equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities would result in the dilution of the then-existing equity interests in us.

24

ITEM 2. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Selected Financial Data

Greektown Superholdings was formed to hold, directly and indirectly through Greektown Sub, all the outstanding membership interests of Greektown Holdings as of the Effective Date and currently has no assets or liabilities. Accordingly, the selected historical consolidated financial data set forth below as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Greektown Holdings and its subsidiaries, which are included elsewhere in this registration statement. The selected historical consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 has been derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Greektown LLC and its subsidiaries, which are not included in this registration statement. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes presented in Item 13 of this registration statement. The Consolidated Financial Statements and Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with theReorganizationstopic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (the “ASC”) and on a going-concern basis that contemplates continuity of operations and realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.

As a result of our bankruptcy reorganization, we will as of the Effective Date adopt “fresh start accounting” as prescribed in accordance with theReorganizationstopic of the ASC. Accordingly, our assets and liabilities will be adjusted to fair value, and certain assets and liabilities not previously recognized in our financial statements will be recognized under fresh start accounting. Because we have not yet completed our reorganization and adopted fresh start accounting, our reported assets and liabilities at December 31, 2009 do not yet give effect to the adjustments that will result from the adoption of fresh start accounting and, as a result, will change materially. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations from and after the Effective Date will not be comparable to the financial condition and results of operations reflected in our historical consolidated financial statements.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2009				2008				2007				2006				2005
	(In thousands)
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues:
Casino		$	332,878			$	297,329			$	321,779			$	330,056			$	319,720
Food and beverage			22,524				11,862				13,959				16,235				14,515
Hotel			7,880				—				—				—				—
Other			4,958				4,608				4,891				4,975				3,904
Total revenues			368,240				313,799				340,629				351,266				338,139
Less promotional allowances			36,635				27,070				25,982				22,053				22,009
Net revenues			331,605				286,729				314,647				329,213				316,130
Direct Operating expenses			192,710				306,612				192,779				194,127				192,124
Indirect operating expenses			86,489				65,836				72,433				68,448				71,030
Total operating expenses			279,199				372,448				265,212				262,574				263,154
Income (loss) from operations			52,406				(85,719	)			49,435				66,638				52,976
Reorganization expenses			(28,711	)			(11,667	)			—				—				—
Other expense			(88,827	)			(51,294	)			(47,445	)			(43,084	)			(32,843	)
(Loss) income before provision for state income taxes			(65,132	)			(148,680	)			1,990				23,555				20,133
Provision for state income taxes			(812	)			(4,228	)			—				—				—
Net (loss) income		$	(65,944	)		$	(152,908	)		$	1,990			$	23,555			$	20,133

25

	As of December 31,
	2009				2008				2007				2006				2005
	(In thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	25,692			$	24,032			$	19,251			$	25,702			$	38,607
Other current assets			39,921				26,708				24,673				24,452				17,905
Property, building and equipment, net			472,271				448,585				286,890				189,642				117,937
Other assets			9,742				14,135				149,947				147,528				149,803
Total assets		$	547,626			$	513,460			$	480,761			$	387,323			$	324,252
Current liabilities not subject to compromise		$	582,971			$	502,408			$	502,646			$	41,217			$	28,813
Long-term liabilities not subject to compromise			3,156				3,461				62,283				467,265				433,902
Liabilities subject to compromise			252,420				232,568				—				—				—
Total members’ deficit			(290,921	)			(224,977	)			(84,168	)			(121,158	)			(138,463	)
Total liabilities and members’ deficit		$	547,626			$	513,460			$	480,761			$	387,323			$	324,252

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes presented in Item 13 of this registration statement. Except for historical information, the discussion in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Future results could differ materially from those discussed below for many reasons, including the risks described in “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” Item 1A—“Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this registration statement.

Overview

Greektown Superholdings was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on March 17, 2010. Greektown Superholdings was formed to hold, directly and indirectly through Greektown Sub, all outstanding membership interests of Greektown LLC, as of the effective date of its emergence from bankruptcy protection. Through Greektown LLC, we will own and operate Greektown Casino. Greektown Casino opened in November 2000 in downtown Detroit. In February 2009, Greektown Casino completed its Expanded Complex at a cost of approximately $336.3 million. Greektown Casino is one of only three commercial casinos licensed to operate in Michigan and our Expanded Complex offers a full range of gaming, dining and entertainment alternatives, including:

• an approximately 100,000 square-foot casino with 2,600 slot machines and 69 table games, including an approximately 12,500 square-foot salon dedicated to high-limit gaming and the largest live poker room in the Metro Detroit Gaming Market;

• approximately 2,950 attached and 1,750 unattached parking spaces, including over 600 parking spaces for valet parking services;

• 10,000 square feet of convention space;

• a 400-room hotel;

• four restaurants, including a 175-seat “International Buffet”;

• several food outlets on the gaming floor; and

• nine bars and two entertainment facilities.

Access to Greektown Casino is facilitated by a nearby off-ramp from Interstate 375 and six interstate highways passing through downtown Detroit. We estimate that we attract approximately 17,000 patrons per day on average, and we believe a significant number of these patrons make regular visits to our property. Our players club, known as “Club Greektown,” is a membership/loyalty program that attracts customers by offering incentives to frequent casino visitors.

26

We had approximately 1.2 million people in our database for Club Greektown as of December 31, 2009, approximately 157,000 of whom had visited Greektown Casino during the preceding 90 days. We believe the Metro Detroit Gaming Market is primarily a “drive-to” gaming market, with over 95% of our patrons residing within 100 miles of Greektown Casino.

We generate cash flow from our casino operations, inclusive of our slot machine and table game businesses, as well as from our food and beverage operations and hotel operations. For the year ended December 31, 2009, revenues from our slot machine-based business accounted for 87.3% of revenues from our casino operations, and revenues from our casino operations accounted for 90.4% of our total revenues. For additional financial information relating to our business please see: Item 13—“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Factors Leading to the Bankruptcy Filing

The following were the primary factors that led to the bankruptcy filing of Greektown Holdings and its subsidiaries on the Petition Date:

Greektown Holdings’ uncertainty with respect to its ability to comply with certain covenants under its pre-petition credit agreement after June 30, 2008

As of December 31, 2007, Greektown Holdings was not in compliance with certain covenants under its Pre-petition Credit Facility (as defined below in “Liquidity and Capital Resources”) but had received a limited waiver of these covenant violations from its pre-petition lenders through June 30, 2008. The waiver required, among other things, that Greektown Holdings receive an equity contribution in 2008, which the Debtors had not obtained by the Petition Date. As a result of the existing and anticipated covenant violations, all outstanding debt obligations of Greektown Holdings could have become due in 2008, which would have allowed the secured lenders to foreclose on the collateral pledged as security.

Greektown Holdings’ inability to obtain sufficient debt or equity financing to complete the Expanded Complex

Significant delays and cost overruns related to the Expanded Complex adversely affected Greektown Holdings’ business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow. As of the Petition Date, Greektown Holdings was unable to secure a financing source for the approximately $161 million needed to complete the Expanded Complex. Failure to complete the Expanded Complex on a timely basis would have resulted in a default under the Development Agreement, may have hindered Greektown Holdings’ ability to compete in the Metro Detroit Gaming Market and may have resulted in monetary penalties, delays of the Tax Rollback (as previously discussed) and eventually a tax increase. Further, because Greektown Holdings lacked sufficient funds to complete the Expanded Complex, Greektown Holdings’ general contractor had threatened to suspend work.

Greektown Holdings’ uncertainty with respect to its ability to cure or receive a waiver of certain financial covenant violations with the MGCB

As a condition to approving Greektown Holdings’ Pre-petition Credit Facility, the MGCB imposed certain financial covenants on Greektown Holdings, which Greektown Holdings had not complied with as of December 31, 2007. In addition, Greektown Holdings did not cure or obtain a waiver of the covenant defaults before an MGCB-imposed April 30, 2008 deadline. Outside of bankruptcy, the covenant violations meant that the MGCB could invoke certain penalties, including, without limitation, the suspension or revocation of Greektown LLC’s casino license or a requirement that Greektown Holdings sell its casino interests on 180 days’ notice from the MGCB. Curing these covenants would have required Greektown Holdings’ equity owners to contribute capital in excess of their ability.

27

Monroe Partners, L.L.C.’s inability to make installment payments to its former members

In July 2000, Monroe, a holding company and one of two primary holders of the membership interests of Greektown Holdings prior to the Effective Date, agreed to make installment payments to certain of its members in exchange for all of their membership interests. Concurrently with this redemption, Kewadin Greektown, the second primary holder of the membership interests of Greektown Holdings prior to the Effective Date, purchased membership interests from Monroe in an amount equal to the redeemed interests and, in connection with that purchase, agreed to secure Monroe’s payment obligations to its former members with Kewadin Greektown’s membership interests in Monroe. An installment payment in the amount of $20.7 million was due to certain of the former members of Monroe on November 10, 2007, but was extended through June 2008, subject to the former members’ option to terminate the waiver on 14 days’ written notice. Outside of bankruptcy, failure to make this installment payment could have resulted in Kewadin Greektown being required to sell its interests in Monroe, which would have constituted a “change-in-control” and an event of default under the Pre-petition Credit Facility.

Other Factors Negatively Impacting Our Results of Operations

In addition to the negative impact we believe the bankruptcy has had on Greektown Holdings’ results of operations, we believe Greektown Holdings’ operating results from 2007, 2008 and 2009 have been negatively impacted by the following factors:

Opening of Permanent Facilities by MGM Detroit, MotorCity and Caesars Windsor

In October 2007, MGM Detroit opened its permanent hotel and casino facility. The facility houses approximately 100,000 square feet of gaming space with an estimated 4,200 slot machines and 98 table games, 400 hotel rooms, over 5,000 parking spaces, 13 restaurants/bars and five entertainment venues. MotorCity partially opened its permanent hotel and casino facility in June 2007 and later fully opened its permanent hotel and casino facility in early 2008. The facility has 100,000 square feet of gaming space with an estimated 2,850 slot machines and 83 table games, over 4,000 parking spaces, 10 restaurants/bars, two entertainment venues, a 400 room hotel and an 1,800 seat theater. Further, MGM Detroit and Motor City had received the Tax Rollback. In June 2008, Caesars Windsor completed its expansion of its facility, which includes a new hotel tower, a 5,000 seat theatre and several new restaurants and bars.

The table below illustrates that Greektown’s percentage of the total adjusted gross gaming revenues of the Detroit Commercial Casinos declined from 25.5% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 23.3% for the year ended December 31, 2008 over the same horizon that the competitor facilities were opened, although the year ended December 31, 2009 saw Greektown’s percentage increase to 25.8%.

	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Detroit Commercial Casinos:(1)
MGM Detroit		40.9	%		42.5	%		38.5	%
MotorCity		33.3	%		34.2	%		36.0	%
Greektown Casino		25.8	%		23.3	%		25.5	%
Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

⁽¹⁾ Market share values for the Detroit Commercial Casinos shown in the above table and elsewhere in this registration statement were obtained from the MGCB website: http://www.michigan.gov/mgcb.

Greektown Construction and Construction on Access Routes

Construction at Greektown Casino commenced in June 2006 and the construction of the Expanded Complex was completed by February 2009. During this time period, there were numerous

28

construction-related obstructions that impeded casino operations. The construction caused numerous changes to the gaming floor layout that we believe frustrated and confused customers, including the relocation of the high-limit gaming room to a temporary location with less privacy. Furthermore, during this time frame, our customers had to consistently play in areas surrounded by construction work. Also, in addition to the construction being performed at Greektown Casino, there was construction work on the main access route to Greektown Casino. This construction created a detour that made our potential patrons drive past both MGM Detroit and MotorCity before arriving at Greektown Casino.

Economic Downturn

Our business has been and may continue to be adversely affected by the economic downturn currently being experienced in the United States, and more particularly in the Detroit metropolitan area, as we are highly dependent on discretionary spending by our patrons. Factors such as increased unemployment, population decline, the current housing market crisis, the current credit crisis, perceived or actual decline in disposable consumer income and wealth, the recent global economic recession and changes in consumer confidence in the economy may continue to reduce customer demand for the leisure activities we offer and may continue to adversely affect our business. More specifically, the economic downturn has impacted the automotive industry in the United States as much as, if not more than, other similarly situated sectors of the U.S. economy. As many of the manufacturers of automobiles and automobile parts and components are based in Detroit or the Detroit metropolitan area, we believe that our geographic location may be susceptible to continuing volatility in the automotive industry.

Chapter 11 Reorganization Efforts

During the pendency of our bankruptcy, we have implemented a number of business improvement initiatives that we believe have and will continue to result in improved operating performance for our business. The following is a summary of the most significant business improvement initiatives that have been implemented since the Petition Date:

Retention of Management Companies

On January 8, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving Greektown Holdings’ retention of Fine Point as gaming consultants pursuant to the Fine Point Consulting Agreement. After obtaining regulatory approval, Fine Point’s Managing Director, Randall A. Fine, was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Greektown Holdings. The Fine Point Consulting Agreement expired on December 31, 2009 and Randall Fine’s position as Chief Executive Officer terminated concurrently. On February 22, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving Greektown Holdings’ retention of WG-Michigan as gaming consultant through the Effective Date pursuant to the WG Consulting Agreement. WG-Michigan is providing one of its officers to serve as the general manager of Greektown.

As of the Effective Date, WG-Michigan will administer, control and conduct all aspects of the operations of Greektown Casino subject to the supervision of our board of directors under the Warner Gaming Management Agreement that is currently being negotiated by Greektown Superholdings and WG-Michigan for a three-year term. WG-Michigan will manage the day to day operations of Greektown Casino on behalf of and for the account of Greektown Superholdings in accordance with the Warner Gaming Management Agreement. WG-Michigan will provide Greektown Superholdings with senior management personnel to provide executive management services. It is expected that as of the Effective Date, WG-Michigan will continue to provide one of its officers or full-time employees to serve as the general manager of Greektown.

Completion of the Expanded Complex

We believe that the finalization of the construction of the Expanded Complex, and the resolution of construction-related issues, has had a favorable impact on our results of operations.

29

The Expanded Complex includes our 400 room hotel that opened in February 2009. We also opened several additional food and beverage outlets, such as the International Buffet.

Other Business Improvement Initiatives

We have implemented a number of business improvement initiatives, which we believe have resulted in improved revenue and profitability for our business, including the remodeling of the high-limit gaming area and the remodeling of the valet parking entrance. We have also instituted a number of cost-saving initiatives, including headcount and salary reductions to our associates, the rejection or re-negotiation of various contracts and the implementation of several successful promotional campaigns and other marketing initiatives by Greektown Holdings.

We believe that these business improvement initiatives have allowed Greektown to achieve significant growth in both profits and operating margins and regain a significant percentage share of the total adjusted gross gaming revenues of the Detroit Commercial Casinos, as illustrated by Greektown’s increase in percentage share of the total adjusted gross gaming revenues of the Detroit Commercial Casinos from 23.3% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 25.8% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Presentation and Basis of Accounting

As previously discussed, on May 29, 2008, the Debtors filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Consolidated Financial Statements and the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement have been prepared in accordance with theReorganizationstopic of the ASC and on a going-concern basis which contemplates continuity of operations and realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. However, as a result of the bankruptcy, the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities is uncertain. While operating as debtors-in-possession under the protection of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtors may sell or otherwise dispose of assets and liquidate or settle liabilities for amounts other than those reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement.

TheReorganizationstopic of the ASC as applied to companies operating in Chapter 11 generally does not change the manner in which financial statements are prepared. However, it does require that the financial statements for periods subsequent to the filing of the Chapter 11 petition distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Revenues, expenses, realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that can be directly associated with the reorganization of the business must be reported separately as reorganization items in the statement of operations beginning in the period ended June 30, 2008. The balance sheet must distinguish pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise from both those pre-petition liabilities that are not subject to compromise and from post-petition liabilities. Liabilities that may be affected by a plan of reorganization must be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. In addition, reorganization items must be disclosed separately in the statement of cash flows. The Debtors adopted the provisions of theReorganizationstopic of the ASC applicable to companies operating in Chapter 11 effective on May 29, 2008, and have segregated those items as outlined above for all reporting periods subsequent to May 29, 2008.

The appropriateness of using the going-concern basis for the Debtors’ financial statements is dependent upon, among other things: (i) the Debtors’ ability to comply with the terms and conditions of the DIP facility; (ii) to improve profitability; (iii) to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy liabilities as they come due; and (iv) to obtain additional financing to meet the Debtors’ future obligations

As further described in Note 6—Long Term Debt, Notes Payable and Debtor In Possession Financingto the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration

30

statement, the Debtors have long-term obligations. These obligations have been classified as either current liabilities or as liabilities subject to compromise as a result of filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection under the Bankruptcy Code.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates. These differences could be material to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this registration statement. Critical accounting policies are those that both are significant to the overall presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments.

We believe our application of accounting policies, and the estimates inherently required by the policies, are reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change. See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesto the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement for a summary of our significant accounting policies.

Net Revenues

Greektown Holdings recognizes as casino revenues the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. Revenues from food and beverage and hotel operations are recognized at the time of sale or upon the provision of service. In accordance with theRevenue Recognitiontopic of the ASC applied to circumstances where consideration is given by a vendor to a customer, the retail value of food, beverage, and other complimentary items furnished to customers without charge is included in revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances to arrive at net revenues.

Allowance for Doubtful Casino Accounts Receivable

Our gaming receivables consist predominantly of gaming markers issued to casino patrons on the gaming floor. We maintain strict controls over the issuance of markers and the collection of outstanding markers from patrons who fail to pay in a timely manner. Our methods of collection include the mailing of statements and delinquency notices, personal contacts through independent collection agencies and civil litigation.

We record an allowance for doubtful casino accounts receivable that represents our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. We assess the amount of the allowance on a quarterly basis based on historical write-off experience and review of returned gaming markers, past-due balances and individual collection analysis. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all reasonable means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets

In accordance with theProperty, Plant and Equipmenttopic of the ASC, we review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We measure recoverability of assets to be held and used by a comparison of the carrying amount of the underlying asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of the underlying asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell.

31

Intangible Assets

Under the Development Agreement, we are entitled to own and operate on a permanent basis a casino complex containing specified amenities (the “Casino Development Rights”) within certain boundaries in the City of Detroit. The Development Agreement gives rise to an identifiable intangible asset that has been determined to have an indefinite life. For further discussion of the terms of the Development Agreement, refer to Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesand Note 5—Casino Development Rights and Impairmentto the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement.

We comply with the provisions of theIntangible Assets—Goodwill and Othertopic of the ASC, which provides guidance on how identifiable intangible assets should be accounted for upon acquisition and subsequent to their initial financial statement recognition. This topic requires that identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives be capitalized and tested for impairment at least annually by comparing the fair values of those assets with their recorded amounts. Accordingly, we perform our impairment test as of October 1 of each year by comparing their estimated fair value to the related carrying value as of that date.

Capitalization of Interest

We capitalize interest costs associated with our casino expansion, hotel and garage construction in accordance with theInteresttopic of the ASC. Accordingly, we begin capitalizing interest costs when construction activities start, and cease when construction activities are substantially complete, using either the interest rate on a borrowing specific to the capital expenditure or a weighted average interest rate based on outstanding indebtedness.

Key Financial Statement Terms

Revenues

Our gross revenues are derived primarily from casino revenues, food and beverage revenues, hotel revenues and other revenues. Our largest component of revenues is casino revenues, which represented approximately 90.4% of our total gross revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009. Gross casino revenues are comprised of revenues from our slot machines (which was the source of approximately 87.3% of total gross casino revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009) and table games, and are calculated as the difference between the amount wagered and the amount paid to customers from gaming activities.

We lease a number of our slot machines and pay participation fees, which are calculated as a percentage of gross slot machine revenue, to our slot machine vendors. Those participation expenses are reflected as a reduction of gross casino revenues. The expenses associated with our “Club Greektown” membership/loyalty program are also reflected as a reduction of gross casino revenues. In accordance with theRevenue Recognitiontopic of the ASC applicable to instances where consideration is given by a vendor to a customer, we expense the cash value of points earned by Club Greektown members and recognize a related liability for any unredeemed points.

32

The following table reflects the composition of gross casino revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

(In thousands)

Gross casino revenue:

Slot machines

 

$

290,628

  

$

263,014

  

$

272,842

 

Table games

  

57,508

   

54,409

   

69,525

 

Participation

  

(8,522

)

  

(13,635

)

  

(14,343

)

Club expense

  

(6,736

)

  

(6,459

)

  

(6,245

)

Total Gross casino revenue

 

$

332,878

  

$

297,329

  

$

321,779

 

Percent of Gross casino revenue

Slot machines

  

87.3

%

  

88.5

%

  

84.8

%

Table games

  

17.3

%

  

18.3

%

  

21.6

%

Participation

  

-2.6

%

  

-4.6

%

  

-4.5

%

Club expense

  

-2.0

%

  

-2.2

%

  

-1.9

%

Total Gross casino revenue

  

100.0

%

  

100.0

%

  

100.0

%

The other principal components of our revenues are our food and beverage revenue and hotel revenue, each of which is affected by customer volume and price, and leasing of certain real estate.

Promotional Allowances

Our gross revenues are reduced by promotional allowances to arrive at net revenues. Promotional allowances consist of the retail value of food, beverage and other complimentary items furnished to customers without charge.

Direct Operating Expenses

Direct operating expenses are those that directly relate to our gaming, food and beverage and hotel operations. The following table illustrates the composition of direct operating expenses and their relationships to net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2009				2008				2007
	(In Thousands)
Direct operating expenses:
Casino		$	75,484			$	77,953			$	83,449
Gaming taxes			75,635				83,116				89,596
Food and beverage			16,427				9,713				11,105
Hotel			6,590				—				—
Depreciation and amortization			18,574				7,590				8,629
Impairment of casino development rights			—				128,240				—
Total direct operating expenses		$	192,710			$	306,612			$	192,779
Relationship to net revenues:
Casino			22.8	%			27.2	%			26.5	%
Gaming taxes			22.8	%			29.0	%			28.5	%
Food and beverage			5.0	%			3.4	%			3.5	%
Hotel			2.0	%			0.0	%			0.0	%
Depreciation and amortization			5.6	%			2.6	%			2.7	%
Impairment of casino development rights			0.0	%			44.7	%			0.0	%
Total direct operating expenses			58.1	%			106.9	%			61.3	%

33

Casino expenses.Casino expenses consist of employee compensation (labor, taxes and benefits), surveillance costs, gaming supplies, casino promotions (including mailing and other ancillary costs) as well as on-site hosting of our casino customers.

Gaming taxes.Gaming taxes include gaming taxes paid to the State of Michigan and City of Detroit, and municipal service fees paid to the City of Detroit. Gaming taxes for the year ended December 31, 2009 reflect the impact of the Tax Rollback effective February 15, 2009 as described in “Michigan Gaming Taxation and Fees”, Item 1—“Business” and elsewhere in this registration statement.

Food and beverage.Food and beverage expenses relate to labor, taxes, benefits, cost of sales and operating supplies.

Hotel.Hotel expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and related expenses as well as facilities-related expenses such as maintenance and utilities.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses consist primarily of the depreciation expense related to our gaming buildings and improvements, our gaming equipment and furnishings, our non-gaming buildings and improvements and our non-gaming office furniture and equipment. Refer toNote 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesand Note 4—Property, Building, and Equipmentto the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement for additional details regarding our property, plant and equipment and depreciation policies.

Impairment of casino development rights.In accordance with theIntangible Assets—Goodwill and Othertopic of the ASC, we recorded an impairment charge of $128.2 million in our statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 based on the results of our annual impairment test for Casino Development Rights. In making the determination that our Casino Development Rights were fully impaired, we considered a number of factors, including, without limitation, the impact of our bankruptcy filing and general decline in consumer spending due to the deteriorating economic conditions in the United States and the resulting impact on the gaming markets. Refer to Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesand Note 5—Casino Development Rights and Impairmentto the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement for additional details regarding the impairment of our Casino Development Rights.

Indirect Operating Expenses

Indirect operating expenses consist predominantly of general overhead expenses that support our overall business, including marketing, advertising and entertainment, non-hotel facilities expenses and other general and administrative expenses. The following table illustrates the composition of indirect operating expenses and their relationships to net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

34

	Years Ended December 31,
	2009				2008				2007
	(In thousands)
Indirect operating expenses:
Marketing, advertising and entertainment		$	8,586			$	5,549			$	7,389
Facilities			18,189				17,932				17,879
Bad debt			—				1,202				—
General and administrative			41,554				39,674				43,269
Lease restoration expense			—				—				2,250
Michigan Single Business Tax			—				—				1,275
Pre-opening expenses			1,043				828				—
City of Detroit settlement			16,629				—				—
Other indirect operating expenses			488				651				371
Total indirect operating expenses		$	86,489			$	65,836			$	72,433
Relationship to net revenues:
Marketing, advertising and entertainment			2.6	%			1.9	%			2.3	%
Facilities			5.5	%			6.3	%			5.7	%
Bad debt			0.0	%			0.4	%			0.0	%
General and administrative			12.5	%			13.8	%			13.8	%
City of Detroit settlement			5.0	%			0.0	%			0.0	%
Lease restoration expense			0.0	%			0.0	%			0.7	%
Michigan Single Business Tax			0.0	%			0.0	%			0.4	%
Pre-opening expenses			0.3	%			0.3	%			0.0	%
Other indirect operating expenses			0.1	%			0.2	%			0.1	%
Total indirect operating expenses			26.1	%			23.0	%			23.0	%

Marketing, advertising and entertainment.Marketing, advertising and entertainment expenses primarily reflect the costs of mass media advertising, including television, radio and billboards.

Facilities.Facility expenses consist of cleaning and maintaining our non-hotel properties, valet parking, the PBX department and wardrobe department, the payroll and benefits to support these activities and casino utilities.

Bad debt.Bad debt expenses reflect the write-off of gaming markers issued to patrons on our gaming floor when facts and circumstances dictate that it is probable that the collection of those balances may be impaired. Refer to Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesto the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement for further information.

General and administrative.General and administrative expenses include the costs of insurance, property taxes, regulatory fees paid to support the MGCB, tribal and board management fees, bonuses paid under union contracts, leases associated with various parking lots, rent, professional fees, donations and various employee costs relating to executives, security, compliance, finance, purchasing, human resources and information technology departments.

City of Detroit settlement.As more fully described in “Michigan Gaming Taxation and Fees”, Item 1—“Business” and elsewhere in this registration statement, the Amended Settlement Agreement obligates the Debtors to pay a one-time Settlement Payment of $16.6 million (net of the Settlement Credit of $3.5 million) to the City of Detroit in satisfaction of any claims of default under the Development Agreement by the City of Detroit. The Settlement Payment was expensed in its entirety by Greektown Holdings during the year ended December 31, 2009. The Settlement Credit has been applied and the Initial Cash Payment of $3.5 million was made to the City of Detroit by the Debtors on February 24, 2010.

Lease restoration expense.During the year ended December 31, 2007, Greektown LLC entered into a settlement agreement with the lessor of a parking garage whereby Greektown LLC agreed to pay $2.3 million related to lease restoration costs. This amount was recorded as an expense during the year ended December 31, 2007.

35

Michigan Single Business Tax.The Michigan Single Business Tax was a value added tax paid by Greektown LLC to the State of Michigan pursuant to Public Act 228, the Single Business Tax Act, which was adopted by the Michigan legislature in 1975 and repealed January 1, 2008. The Michigan Single Business Tax was not considered an income tax under theIncome Taxestopic of the ASC.

Pre-opening expenses.Pre-opening expenses consist primarily of start-up labor, training, marketing, and advertising related to the hotel that were incurred prior to its opening in February 2009.

Other indirect operating expenses.Other indirect operating expenses are primarily costs associated with maintaining the various retail parking spaces and garages, including utilities and maintenance, related to rental income.

Reorganization Expenses

Reorganization expenses consist predominantly of fees paid to restructuring professionals and other costs directly associated with the bankruptcy process. Reorganization expenses were $28.7 million and $11.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Other Expense

Other expense consists primarily of interest on our indebtedness, the amortization of deferred financing costs, interest income earned on our investments in certificates of deposit, unrealized loss on interest rate swaps and success fees paid to Fine Point. As discussed earlier in Item 2—“Financial Information—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” Greektown LLC entered into the Fine Point Consulting Agreement with Fine Point dated December 31, 2008. Pursuant to the Fine Point Consulting Agreement, Fine Point was paid a monthly fee of $150,000 plus expenses for its consulting services, as well as quarterly success fees, which were conditioned upon Greektown LLC exceeding certain established financial performance goals provided in the Fine Point Consulting Agreement. Success fees payable to Fine Point were $6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The agreement expired as of December 31, 2009 and was not renewed. Refer to Note 11—Commitments and Contingenciesto the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement for further information.

The following table illustrates the components of other expense and their relationships to net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2009				2008				2007
	(In thousands)
Other expense:
Interest expense		$	(69,998	)		$	(38,629	)		$	(37,052	)
Amortization of finance fees and accretion of discount on senior notes			(12,923	)			(10,252	)			(3,680	)
Interest income			171				235				735
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps			—				(2,650	)			(7,385	)
Consulting company success fees			(6,240	)			—				—
Miscellaneous expense			163				2				(63	)
Total other expense		$	(88,827	)		$	(51,294	)		$	(47,445	)
Relationship to net revenues:
Interest expense			-21.1	%			-13.5	%			-11.8	%
Amortization of finance fees and accretion of discount on senior notes			-3.9	%			-3.6	%			-1.2	%
Interest income			0.1	%			0.1	%			0.2	%
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps			0.0	%			-0.9	%			-2.3	%
Consulting company success fees			-1.9	%			0.0	%			0.0	%
Miscellaneous expense			0.0	%			0.0	%			0.0	%
Total other expense			-26.8	%			-17.9	%			-15.1	%

36

Provision For State Income Taxes

The provision for state income taxes reflects our current and deferred provisions for the Michigan Business Tax, which is considered an income tax under theIncome Taxestopic of the ASC. The following table illustrates the components of the provision for state income taxes and their relationships to net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2009				2008				2007
	(In thousands)
Provision for state income taxes:
Michigan business tax (expense)—current		$	(1,117	)		$	(1,553	)		$	—
Michigan business tax benefit (expense)—deferred			305				(2,675	)			—
Total provision for state income taxes		$	(812	)		$	(4,228	)		$	—
Relationship to net revenues:
Michigan business tax (expense)—current			-0.3	%			-0.5	%			0.0	%
Michigan business tax benefit (expense)—deferred			0.1	%			-0.9	%			0.0	%
Total provision for state income taxes			-0.2	%			-1.5	%			0.0	%

Refer to Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesto the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement for additional details regarding Michigan Business Tax.

Results of Operations

The following is a discussion of the principal trends in our operating performance for the years ended December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2007.

Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2008

Net revenues.Net revenues increased by $44.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2009 over the prior year driven by an increase in gross revenues of $54.4 million, which was partially offset by an increase in promotional expenses of $9.5 million. The increase in gross revenues reflects increases in casino revenue of $35.5 million, food and beverage sales of $10.7 million, hotel revenue of $7.9 million and other revenue of $0.4 million. The increase in casino revenue was primarily a result of growth in slot machine revenue (net of participation expense) of $27.6 million over the prior year as a result of the completion of the Expanded Complex in early 2009, the success of various promotional campaigns and reductions in participations through buyouts of slot machine leases. The increase in food and beverage revenue was driven by the addition and enhancement of several food and beverage locations in late 2008 and early 2009, most notably the “International Buffet.” The increase in hotel revenue over the prior year was due to the fact that the hotel began operating in early 2009. The increase in promotional allowances was primarily attributable to the overall increase in gross revenue, which provides more opportunities for our customers to spend promotional allowances.

Direct operating expenses.Direct operating expenses decreased by $113.9 million, or 48.8% of net revenues, in the year ended December 31, 2009 over the prior year. The following is a discussion of the principal drivers of trends in direct operating expenses:

• Casino expenses.Casino-related expenses declined by $2.5 million, or 4.4% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2009, despite growth in casino revenue, primarily as a result of a reduction in labor related expenses due to a restructuring of roles on the gaming floor and the back office whereby we combined certain responsibilities and eliminated certain positions.

• Gaming taxes.Gaming taxes declined by $7.5 million, or 6.2% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2009 as a result of the impact of the Tax Rollback, as previously

37

	discussed in “Michigan Gaming Taxation and Fees”, Item 1—“Business” and elsewhere in this registration statement.
•	Food and beverage expenses.Food and beverage expenses increased by $6.7 million, or 1.6% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2009 as a result of the growth in food and beverage sales over the prior year, as previously discussed.
•	Hotel expenses.Hotel expenses increased by $6.6 million, or 2.0% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2009 due to the fact that the hotel began operating in early 2009.
•	Depreciation and amortization expense.Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $11.0 million, or 3.0% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2009 primarily due to the increase in depreciation related to the hotel facility as this asset was placed into service in early 2009.
•	Impairment of Casino Development Rights.The decline in this category was a function of the fact that the prior period included a one-time impairment charge of $128.2 million related to the Casino Development rights intangible asset, as previously discussed.

Indirect operating expenses.Indirect operating expenses increased by $20.7 million, or 3.1% of net revenues, in the year ended December 31, 2009 over the prior year. The following is a discussion of the principal drivers of trends in indirect operating expenses:

• Marketing, advertising and entertainment expenses.Marketing, advertising and entertainment expenses increased by $3.0 million, or 0.7% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2009 primarily as a result of increased spending on television and radio production costs of $5.2 million which were partially offset by reductions in sponsorships of $0.6 million, entertainment-related expenses of $0.5 million, special events of $0.4 million, outdoor advertising of $0.2 million, bus group advertising of $0.2 million and other miscellaneous advertising program expenses of $0.3 million.

• Facilities expenses.Facilities expense increased by $0.3 million, but declined by 0.8% of net revenues during the year ended December 31, 2009 primarily due to spending increases in utilities services of $0.4 million and repairs and maintenance of $0.2 million, which were partially offset by a reduction in valet costs of $0.2 million and wardrobe expenses of $0.1 million.

• Bad debt expense.Bad debt expense declined by $1.2 million, or 0.4% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2009 due to the write-off of gaming markers to certain high-limit players during the prior year.

• General and administrative expenses.General and administrative expenses increased by $1.9 million, but declined by 1.3% of net revenues during the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the prior year as a result of increases in property tax and insurance expenses of $2.6 million, information technology expenses of $0.8 million, administrative expenses of $0.3 million, MGCB fees of $0.2 million, bank charges of $0.2 million and other licenses and taxes of $0.2 million, which were partially offset by reductions in human resources expenses of $0.6 million, corporate expenses of $0.5 million, casino management fees of $0.4 million, union bonuses of $0.3 million, parking expenses of $0.3 million, security expenses of $0.2 million and purchasing expenses of $0.1 million.

• City of Detroit Settlement.As more fully described in“Michigan Gaming Taxation and Fees”,Item 1—“Business”and elsewhere in this registration statement, among other things, the Amended Settlement Agreement obligates the Debtors to pay a one-time Settlement Payment of $16.6 million (before application of the Settlement Credit as previously discussed) to the City of Detroit in satisfaction of any claims of default under the Development Agreement by the City of Detroit. The Settlement Payment was expensed in its entirety by Greektown Holdings during the year ended December 31, 2009.

• Pre-opening expenses.Pre-opening expenses during the year ended December 31, 2009 increased by $0.2 million, but remained flat as a percentage of net revenues, primarily as a

38

	result of the addition of hotel staff in the months leading up to the hotel opening in early 2009.
•	Other indirect expenses.Other indirect expenses declined by $0.2 million, or 0.1% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2009 primarily as a result of certain cost savings initiatives that were implemented in 2009, including the closure of the gift shop.

Reorganization expenses.Reorganization expenses increased by $17.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2009 over the prior year primarily due to higher professional fees correlated with activities in the bankruptcy cases.

Other expense.Other expense increased by $37.5 million or 8.9% of net revenues during the year ended December 31, 2009 over the prior year. The following is a discussion of the primary drivers of the trends in other expense.

• Interest expense.Interest expense increased by $31.4 million, or 7.6% of net revenues, as a result of higher borrowings primarily as a result of the funding of the completion of the construction of the Expanded Complex and the impact of the higher interest rate associated with the DIP Facility.

• Amortization of finance fees and accretion of discount on senior notes.This category increased by $2.7 million, or 0.3% of net revenues, as a result of the write-off of deferred financing costs associated with the DIP Facility.

• Consulting company success fees.Fine Point success fees increased by approximately $6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 over the prior year due to the fact that the Fine Point Consulting Agreement was not executed until December 31, 2008.

• Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps.The unrealized loss on interest rates swaps decreased by $2.7 million, or 0.9% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2009 due to the termination of interest rate swaps upon the commencement of the bankruptcy cases on the Petition Date.

Provision for state income taxes.The provision for state income taxes decreased by $3.4 million, or 1.3% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2009 over the prior year primarily as a result of the timing of capital purchases relative to the Expanded Complex.

Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2007

Net revenues.Net revenues decreased by $27.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2008 over the comparable period in the prior year driven by a reduction in gross revenue of $26.8 million and an increase in promotional allowances of $1.1 million. The reduction in gross revenue was due to reductions in casino revenue of $24.4 million, decreases in food and beverage sales of $2.1 million and decreases in other revenue of $0.3 million. The decline in casino revenue during this period was driven by reductions in revenue from table games of $15.1 million and reductions in revenue from slot machines, net of participation expenses, of $9.1 million and an increase in Club Greektown expense of $0.2 million. The reductions in revenue from table games and slot machines were primarily as a result of MGM Detroit and MotorCity having opened their expanded facilities in 2007 and 2008, respectively, the player dislocation and inconvenience associated with the construction of the Expanded Complex, the relocation and remodeling of the high-limit room and the issues with the construction of the access routes to the casino complex. The increase in promotional allowances was a result of heightened promotional activities in an attempt to bolster casino revenue.

Direct operating expenses.Direct operating expenses increased by $113.8 million, or 45.7% of net revenues, in the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the prior year driven by the impairment of Casino Development Rights of $128.2 million as previously discussed, which was partially offset by reductions in casino operating expenses of $5.5 million, gaming taxes of $6.5 million, food and beverage expenses of $1.4 million and a reduction in depreciation and amortization of $1.0 million. The reductions in casino expenses, gaming taxes and food and beverage-related expenses were a result of the overall decline in casino and food and beverage revenue during the

39

period. The reduction in depreciation and amortization expense was driven largely by the fact that certain gaming-related fixed assets were fully depreciated during the year ended December 31, 2008.

Indirect operating expenses.Indirect operating expenses decreased by $6.6 million, but remained relatively consistent as a percentage of net revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. The following is a description of the primary drivers of the net reduction in indirect operating expenses, including discussion of certain partially offsetting increases in categories of indirect operating expenses:

• Marketing, advertising and entertainment expenses.Marketing, advertising and entertainment expenses declined by $1.8 million, or 0.4% of net revenues, from the year ended December 31, 2007 to 2008 as a result of reductions in entertainment spending of $1.2 million, a decrease in discretionary television, radio and billboard advertising of $0.4 million, decrease in bus group advertising of $0.2 million and decreased sponsorship spending of $0.5 million, all of which were partially offset by increases in other marketing expenses of $0.5 million, such as the development of marketing collateral, special events and contract services.

• Facilities expenses.Facilities expenses increased on a net basis by $0.1 million, or 0.6% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily due to an increase in utilities expenses of $0.4 million, wardrobe costs of $0.1 million and utilities expenses of $0.3 million, which were partially offset by a reduction in valet costs of $0.7 million.

• Bad debt expense.Bad debt expense increased by $1.2 million, or 0.4% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2008 relative to the previous year as a result of the write-off of gaming markers to certain high-limit players during the period.

• General and administrative expenses.General and administrative expenses declined by $3.6 million, but remained relatively flat as a percent of net revenues, as a result of a reduction in parking expenses of $3.0 million, a reduction in donations of $0.6 million, reduced legal costs of $0.4 million, reduced tribal and board management fees of $0.8 million and the avoidance of expenses related to the Fine Point Consulting Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2008, which amounted to $0.6 million as a result of a successful motion to reject the contract through the bankruptcy process. The decreases in these costs were offset by increases in property tax and insurance costs of $0.9 million, MGCB Annual Assessment fee of $0.3 million, and an increase in general and administrative payroll of $0.6 million.

• Pre-opening expenses.Pre-opening expenses increased from $0 during the year ended December 31, 2007 to $0.8 million, or 0.3% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2008 as a function of the fact that those expenses were not incurred until the hotel construction was substantially completed during 2008.

• Lease restoration expense.Lease restoration expense declined by $2.3 million, or 0.7% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the prior year as a result of the fact that the lease restoration charge was taken entirely in the year ended December 31, 2007.

• Michigan Single Business Tax.Michigan Single Business Tax expense declined by $1.3 million, or 0.4% of net revenues, from the year ended December 31, 2007 to 2008 due to the fact that the State of Michigan repealed the Single Business Tax Act on January 1, 2008.

• Other indirect expenses.Other indirect expenses increased by $0.3 million, or 0.1% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2008 reflecting increased retail store payroll and other expenses associated with the opening of a larger gift shop during the year.

Reorganization expenses.Reorganization expenses increased by $11.7 million, or 4.1% of net revenues, from the year ended December 31, 2007 to the year ended December 31, 2008 due to the filing of the bankruptcy cases in May 2008.

Other expense.Other expense increased by $3.8 million, or 2.8% of net revenues, from the year ended December 31, 2007 to the year ended December 31, 2008. The overall increase in this category was driven by the following trends in the components of other expense:

40

• Amortization of deferred finance fees and accretion of discounts on senior notes.This category increased by approximately $6.5 million, or 2.4% of net revenues, in the year ended December 31, 2008 due to additional fees associated with the DIP Facility of $2.2 million and the full amortization of $2.7 million of financing fees and accretion of the discount on senior notes of $1.6 million as a result of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing.

• Interest expense.Interest expense increased by approximately $1.5 million, or 1.7% of net revenues, as a result of the higher rate of interest associated with the DIP Facility following the commencement of the bankruptcy cases in 2008.

• Interest income.Interest income declined by approximately $0.5 million, or 0.2% of net revenues, during the period primarily as a result of a reduction in interest rate on certificates of deposit.

• Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps.The unrealized loss on interest rates swaps decreased by $4.7 million, or 1.4% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2008 due to the termination of interest rate swaps upon the commencement of the bankruptcy cases on the Petition Date.

Provision for state income taxes.The provision for state income taxes increased by $4.2 million, or 1.5% of net revenues, during the year ended December 31, 2008 relative to the prior year as a result of the fact that the Michigan Business Tax was not enacted by the Michigan Legislature until July 2007.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our cash requirements have historically been for working capital, obligations under the Development Agreement, gaming taxes, debt service, the improvement of our facilities, including the Expanded Complex, the payment of management fees, tax distributions and, most recently, the funding of reorganization expenses associated with our bankruptcy and fees related to the Fine Point Consulting Agreement. Our interest expense and liquidity demands have increased significantly because of, among other things, our increased indebtedness compared to prior periods due, in part, to the construction of our Expanded Complex, higher interest rates and expenses associated with our reorganization and fees and expenses payable under the Fine Point Consulting Agreement.

In December 2005, we entered into a loan agreement (the “Pre-petition Credit Facility”) that provided for a $190 million term loan and a $100 million revolving credit facility and we issued $185 million of 10.75% Senior Notes due 2013 (the “Senior Notes”). In April 2007, we increased the availability under the revolving credit portion of the Pre-petition Credit Facility to $125 million. In April 2007, we also entered into a $37.5 million incremental delayed draw term loan to be drawn within one year. However, in connection with our temporary waiver agreement with the lenders under the Pre-petition Credit Facility, we agreed to reduce the commitments under the incremental delayed term loan to zero. As of the Effective Date, the Pre-petition Credit Facility will be terminated and the Senior Notes will be cancelled.

On June 9, 2008, following the commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings, we entered into a $150 million DIP facility (the “Original DIP Facility”) in order to finance the remainder of the Expanded Complex and provide funding for working capital and the costs associated with our reorganization. The Original DIP Facility included a delayed draw term loan for $135 million and a revolving credit facility for $15 million. The funds from the delayed draw term loan facility were only available to be used for construction related expenditures, while the funds from the revolving credit facility were available to pay operational and construction related expenses.

The Original DIP Facility was amended and restated on February 20, 2009 (the “Amended and Restated Original DIP Facility”) to provide up to an additional $46 million in two delayed draw term loans. The Amended and Restated Original DIP Facility was replaced on December 29, 2009 by a $210 million DIP Facility in order to refinance the Amended and Restated Original DIP Facility and to provide funding for working capital and the costs associated with our reorganization.

41

The DIP Facility includes a $190 million term loan and a $20 million delayed draw term loan. There are strict guidelines as to how these funds can be used subject to approval and monitoring by the U.S. Trustee as well as the MGCB. The DIP Facility bears interest at a fixed rate of 14.5% per annum, of which 11.0% is paid in cash and 3.5% is paid-in-kind. As of December 31, 2009, the term loan was fully drawn and $20 million remained available under the delayed draw term loan. As of December 31, 2009, the Debtors were in compliance with all financial covenants under the DIP Facility. On the Effective Date, the DIP Facility will be repaid.

For further detail regarding the Original DIP Facility and the Amended and Restated Original DIP Facility, see Note 6—Long-term Debt, Notes Payable, and Debtor in Possession Financingto the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement.

Our cash flows for the years ending December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 consisted of the following:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2009				2008				2007
	(In thousands)
Cash flows:
Net cash provided by operating activities		$	3,873			$	29,616			$	27,364
Net cash used in investing activities			(42,268	)			(169,303	)			(106,651	)
Net cash provided by financing activities			40,055				144,468				72,836
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents		$	1,660			$	4,781			$	(6,451	)

Net cash provided by operating activities.Net cash provided by operating activities declined by $25.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 as higher interest costs associated with the DIP facility, higher reorganization expenses and higher expenses associated with the Fine Point Consulting Agreement more than offset improved profitability generated primarily as a result of higher gaming, food and beverage and hotel revenues driven principally by the success of promotional activities and the completion of the Expanded Complex. Net cash provided by operating activities improved by $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007 as cash flow generated from working capital changes more than offset reduced profitability as a result of lower casino and food and beverage revenues primarily as a result of the player dislocation and inconvenience associated with the construction of the Expanded Complex, the relocation and remodeling of the high-limit room and the issues with the construction of the access routes to the casino complex as previously discussed. Net cash provided by operating activities for all periods was generated from cash received through our operations reduced by interest expense.

Net cash used in investing activities.Net cash used in investing activities declined by $127.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 due to higher capital expenditures in the prior year associated with the construction of the Expanded Complex, which was completed in early 2009. Net cash used in investing activities increased by $62.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the prior year driven by increased capital expenditures related to the Expanded Complex.

Net cash provided by financing activities.Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $104.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 due to the lower net proceeds from the DIP facility. Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $71.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the prior year driven primarily by the borrowings under the DIP facility, which was partially offset by a reduction in equity contributions from Kewadin Greektown as discussed more fully in Item 7—“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, Director Independence.”

Exit Financing

As previously discussed, upon the Effective Date, we expect that Greektown will issue approximately $385 million of New Senior Secured Notes, which is expected to result in $362 million of net proceeds, and secure access to the Revolving Loan of $30 million. On the Effective Date, the

42

proceeds from the sale of the New Senior Secured Notes will be used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the DIP facility, to repay the pre-petition secured claims, and to make other payments required upon exit from bankruptcy. The proceeds from the sale of the New Senior Secured Notes remaining after the foregoing payments have been made, as well as the Revolving Loan, if it is drawn upon, will provide ongoing liquidity to conduct post-reorganization operations. Certain of the Noteholder Plan Proponents have committed to purchase, in the aggregate, $200 million of the New Senior Secured Notes, and the members of an ad hoc group of pre-petition secured lenders have committed to purchase, in the aggregate, $185 million of the New Senior Secured Notes. With regard to the New Senior Secured Notes, a combination of a commitment fee and an original issue discount will apply. The New Senior Secured Notes will mature five (5) years from the issuance date.

Greektown Superholdings is currently seeking a revolving lender and anticipates that it will obtain a commitment for the Revolving Loan prior to the Effective Date.

The Revolving Loan will be unconditionally guaranteed by Greektown Holdings and all its direct and indirect subsidiaries. The Revolving Loan will be secured by a perfected first priority lien and security interest on all the assets of Greektown and all its direct and indirect subsidiaries. The obligations under the Revolving Loan will also be secured by a pledge of the membership interests and/or capital stock of Greektown Holdings and all its direct and indirect subsidiaries. The New Senior Secured Notes will be secured by a perfected lien and security interest on all the assets of Greektown and all its direct and indirect subsidiaries, junior only to the lien and security interest granted to lenders under the Revolving Loan. Subject to certain exceptions, the New Senior Secured Notes will also be secured by a pledge of the membership interests and/or capital stock of Greektown Holdings and all its direct and indirect subsidiaries, junior only to the pledge of such interests to the lenders under the Revolving Loan.

The New Senior Secured Notes will bear interest at a fixed rate of 13% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears.

Subject to certain exceptions, Greektown will be required to make certain mandatory redemptions of the New Senior Secured Notes with 50% of its consolidated excess cash flow for any fiscal year, beginning in fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 at 103% of the principal being repaid and offer to redeem the New Senior Secured Notes upon a change of control, or with the net proceeds of the sale of certain assets. Greektown will also be entitled to voluntarily redeem the New Senior Secured Notes beginning 2.5 years from the date of delivery at the redemption price of (i) approximately 106.5% of the principal amount thereof for redemptions that occur from the date that is 2.5 years from the date of delivery through the date that is 3.5 years after the date of delivery, (ii) approximately 103.5% of the principal amount thereof for redemptions that occur from the date that is 3.5 years after the date of delivery through the date that is 4 years after the date of delivery, and (iii) 100% of the principal amount thereof at any time thereafter, in each case, plus any accrued interest thereon.

The New Senior Secured Notes will, and we expect that the Revolving Loan will, contain covenants limiting the ability of Greektown and/or its direct and indirect subsidiaries (and in certain instances Greektown Superholdings) to, among other things, (i) engage in businesses other than the operation of Greektown Casino; (ii) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; (iii) create liens; (iv) make certain investments; (v) pay dividends on or make payments in respect of capital stock; (vi) consolidate or merge with other companies; (vii) sell certain assets; (viii) enter into transactions with affiliates; (ix) agree to negative pledge clauses and (x) enter into sales and leasebacks. Failure to comply with the covenants under the New Senior Secured Notes or the Revolving Loan could result in a default under the applicable documents unless Greektown obtains a waiver of, or otherwise mitigates, the default.

Defaults under the New Senior Secured Notes will, and we expect that defaults under the Revolving Loan will, occur if Greektown and/or its direct and indirect subsidiaries, among other things, (i) fails to pay principal, interest, fees or other amounts when due; (ii) breaches any covenants which are not cured within a stated cure period; (iii) defaults under certain other indebtedness; (iv) is subject to certain judgments; (v) fails to keep liens or security interests valid;

43

(vi) becomes bankrupt or insolvent; (vii) impairs any collateral to the loans; (ix) ceases to own the casino complex; or (x) loses its gaming or certain other licenses, or the legal authority to conduct gaming activities. A default could result in an acceleration of the New Senior Secured Notes and a termination of the Revolving Loan and acceleration of amounts outstanding thereunder.

In addition to the Exit Financing, we will be issuing shares of our preferred stock under the Plan as described under Item 1—“Business—Bankruptcy Considerations.”

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

As of the Effective Date, we anticipate that our contractual obligations and commercial commitments will be as follows:

	Payment Due By Period
	Total			Less than 1 year			1-3 years			3-5 years			More than 5 years
	(In thousands)
Exit Financing—New Senior Secured Notes(1)		$	385,000		$	—		$	—		$	385,000		$	—
Interest on Exit Financing(2)			250,250			50,050			100,100			100,100			—
Exit Financing—Revolving Loan(3)			30,000			—			—			30,000			—
Payments to Unsecured Distribution Fund Under Plan(4)			10,000			10,000			—			—			—
Development Agreement(5)			*			*			*			*			*
Warner Gaming Management Agreement(6)			5,400			1,800			3,600			—			—
Capital Lease Obligations(7)			9,044			336			672			672			7,364
Total		$	689,694		$	62,186		$	104,372		$	515,772		$	7,364

(1)	With respect to principal amortization, Greektown Superholdings will be required to redeem the New Senior Secured Notes in an amount equal to 50% of Consolidated Excess Cash Flow (to be defined in the definitive documentation as EBITDA less capital expenditures, less cash interest expense, less cash tax expense) for such fiscal year, beginning with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. All such Consolidated Excess Cash Flow redemption payments are to be made at 103% of principal being repaid. We did not include anticipated principal amortization based on Consolidated Excess Cash Flow in this schedule as these amounts are conditioned on Greektown Superholdings achieving future EBITDA figures that are not determinable at this time. Rather, all principal amortization for purposes of this calculation is assumed to take place upon expiration of the New Senior Secured Notes five years from the Effective Date.
(2)	For the purposes of this calculation, interest payments were calculated by applying an interest rate of 13%, which is the rate that is anticipated to be in effect upon the Effective Date.
(3)	For purposes of this calculation, we have assumed that the entire commitment amount has been drawn and that there are no amortization payments required with respect to the Revolving Loan. Amounts listed are based on the payment of the full commitment amount upon expiration of the Revolving Loan.
(4)	Pursuant to the Plan, Greektown Superholdings is required to fund $10 million in cash into the Unsecured Distribution Fund for distribution to Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims in the General Unsecured Classes as defined in the Plan in four equal installments of $2.5 million, the first of which will be paid on the date that is three months after the Effective Date, the second on the date that is six months after the Effective Date, the third on the date that is nine months after the Effective Date and the fourth on the date that is one year after the Effective Date.
(5)	The Development Agreement requires us to pay the City of Detroit a daily fee in the amount of 1% of adjusted gross receipts, which will increase to 2% of adjusted gross receipts if our adjusted gross receipts exceed $400 million in any calendar year, beginning on the day such receipts are reached and continuing thereafter. We have not included these amounts in the table as the payments are conditioned on future adjusted gross receipts that are not determinable at this time. In addition, if and when the $400 million gross receipt number is satisfied, we will be required to

44

	pay a one-time fee of $4 million to the City of Detroit, which we did not include in the table above as we cannot determine whether we will exceed the $400 million in adjusted gross receipts for any particular year.
(6)	Amounts listed are based on the base monthly fees to be paid to WG-Michigan pursuant to the Warner Gaming Management Agreement between Greektown LLC and WG-Michigan and do not include quarterly success fee payments, which were not included because those amounts are conditioned upon Greektown Superholdings exceeding certain established financial performance goals and are not determinable at this time.
(7)	We lease a portion of the Expanded Complex known as the St. Mary’s School Building from Adam J. Maida, Roman Catholic Archbishop of the Archdiocese of the City of Detroit. In accordance with the provisions of theLeasestopic of the ASC, we account for this lease as a capital lease. The amounts listed reflect the minimum contractual lease payments from the Effective Date forward under the lease agreement.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Effective July 1, 2009, the FASB issued the ASC, which became the single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP. The historical GAAP hierarchy was eliminated and the ASC became the only level of authoritative GAAP, other than guidance issued by the SEC. All other literature became non-authoritative. The ASC is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. As the ASC was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it will not have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued a new standard that defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands the disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. The standard does not introduce new requirements mandating the use of fair value.

The new standard defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” The definition is based on an exit price rather than an entry price, regardless of whether the entity plans to hold or sell the asset.

The topic also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements in order to facilitate comparisons between entities choosing different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This standard does not affect existing accounting requirements for certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. Greektown Holdings adopted the provisions of this standard as it relates to financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008 and as it relates to non-financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009.

The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Greektown Holdings’ consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued a new pronouncement which seeks to enhance disclosure about how and why a company uses derivative and hedging activities, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for (and the interpretations of that topic) and how derivatives and hedging activities affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Greektown Holdings consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued a new standard regarding subsequent events which introduces the concept of financial statements being available to be issued. This standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after June 15, 2009. During the second quarter of 2009, Greektown Holdings adopted the provisions of theSubsequent Eventstopic of the ASC, which established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The adoption of the topic did not have a material impact on Greektown Holdings’ consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

45

See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesto the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 13 of this registration statement.

Inflation

We believe that general inflation had no significant impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 or 2007. Absent changes in competitive and economic conditions in Detroit or specific events affecting the hotel and casino industry generally, we do not expect that inflation will have a significant impact on our operations in the future. Changes in specific prices, such as fuel and transportation prices, relative to the general rate of inflation may have a material adverse effect on the hotel and casino industry in general, and therefore our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Business Seasonality

Our gaming operations are affected by the weather. We have experienced downturns in customer volume during the summer months and increases in volume during winter months, although we do experience lower volume during severe winter storms. These seasonal and adverse weather conditions in the Detroit metropolitan area may discourage potential customers from visiting us. We believe we have also experienced downturns in customer volume as a consequence of nearby road repairs and construction, which generally occur in the spring, summer and fall, as well as during various sporting or entertainment events in downtown Detroit.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign exchange and commodity prices. We do not believe we are subject to material risk from adverse changes in foreign exchange or commodity prices. We are subject to market risk from adverse changes in interest rates.

One of the conditions to the effectiveness of the Plan is that Greektown Superholdings will obtain a $30 million Revolving Loan under the Exit Financing. The interest rate margins for such Revolving Loan have not yet been determined. If interest rates hypothetically increase, interest expense with respect to the expected Revolving Loan borrowings would increase, however, the extent of such increase cannot be determined at this time.

We do not enter into derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes, but we expect to enter into derivatives, particularly interest rate swaps, to protect interest rate exposure arising from our borrowings under the Revolving Loan by effectively swapping them into fixed rates.

ITEM 3. PROPERTIES

We own the land on which Greektown Casino (including the Expanded Complex) is located through Greektown LLC, except with respect to a portion of the Expanded Complex known as the St. Mary’s School Building which we lease from Adam J. Maida, Roman Catholic Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Detroit. We also own various parking lots and garages that we own through either Greektown LLC, Contract Builders or Realty Equity. We believe that all of our current facilities are in good condition and are suitable and adequate for the purposes for which they are used.

In the past, we have also entered into non-cancelable operating leases, primarily for office and for warehouse space, equipment and vehicles; certain of these leases include escalation clauses relating to the Consumer Price Index, utilities, taxes and other operating expenses. Rental expense under these agreements for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $80,000, $423,000 and $2,662,000, respectively. The rental expenses in 2007 included the expense of renting lots for parking prior to Greektown LLC’s construction and opening of its own parking garage. None of these agreements are currently in effect.

We lease certain portions of our owned facilities to third parties under operating leases, primarily for retail use. Rental income under these leases for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $506,000, $660,000 and $778,000, respectively.

46

ITEM 4. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the expected beneficial ownership of Greektown Superholdings’ Common Stock and Preferred Stock as of the Effective Date for (i) each person who is expected to be a member of our board of directors following the Effective Date (the “Board”), (ii) each named executive officer, (iii) each person known to Greektown Superholdings and expected to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Common Stock or Preferred Stock and (iv) the persons who are expected to be members of our board of directors and the named executive officers of Greektown Superholdings as a group. Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC, and generally a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he possesses sole or shared voting or investment power of that security, and includes any securities that a person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Information with respect to beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Common Stock or Preferred Stock is based on completed questionnaires and related information provided by such beneficial owners as of March 15, 2010. It should be noted that none of the Common Stock or Preferred Stock will be issued until the Effective Date. Except as indicated, all shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock will be owned directly, and the person or entity listed as the beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power. The address for each director and executive officer is c/o Greektown Superholdings, Inc., 555 East Lafayette, Detroit, Michigan 48226.

Name, Position and Address of Beneficial Owner	Series A-1 Common Stock					Series A-1 Preferred Stock						Series A-2 Preferred Stock				Total					Voting(10)
	Number Beneficially Owned		% of Total Series A-1 Common Stock			Number Beneficially Owned			% of Total Series A-1 Preferred Stock			Number Beneficially Owned		% of Total Series A-2 Preferred Stock		Total Number of Capital Stock Beneficially Owned		% of Total Capital Stock			% of Voting Capital Stock
John Bitove, Director		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
George Boyer, Director(1)		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
Michael E. Duggan, Director		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
Benjamin Duster, Director		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
Joel I. Ferguson, Director		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
Freman Hendrix, Director		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
Yvette E, Landau, Director		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
Cliff J. Vallier, President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
Salvatore Semola, VP		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
All Board directors and named executive officers as a group		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
John Hancock Bond Fund(2)		885		0.63	%		17,280			1.08	%		—		—		18,165		0.85	%		1.12	%
John Hancock Income Securities Trust(2)		768		0.55	%		14,991			0.93	%		—		—		15,759		0.74	%		0.97	%
John Hancock Investors Trust(2)		978		0.70	%		19,074			1.19	%		—		—		20,052		0.94	%		1.24	%
John Hancock Funds III Leveraged Companies Fund(2)		92		0.07	%		1,563			0.10	%		—		—		1,655		0.08	%		0.10	%
John Hancock Funds II Active Bond Fund(2)		166		0.12	%		3,249			0.20	%		—		—		3,415		0.16	%		0.21	%
John Hancock Funds Trust Active Bond Trust(2)		821		0.59	%		16,024			1.00	%		—		—		16,845		0.79	%		1.04	%
Manulife Global Funds U.S. Bond Fund(2)		38		0.03	%		739			0.05	%		—		—		777		0.04	%		0.05	%
Manulife Global Fund US Special Bond Fund(2)		148		0.11	%		2,879			0.18	%		—		—		3,027		0.14	%		0.19	%
Manulife Global Fund Strategic Income(2)		64		0.05	%		1,255			0.08	%		—		—		1,319		0.06	%		0.08	%
John Hancock Trust Strategic Income Trust(2)		269		0.19	%		6,111			0.38	%		—		—		6,380		0.30	%		0.39	%
John Hancock Funds II High Income Fund(2)		7,894		5.64	%		154,240			9.61	%		—		—		162,134		7.58	%		10.01	%
John Hancock Funds II Strategic Income Fund(2)		3,049		2.18	%		58,712			3.66	%		—		—		61,761		2.89	%		3.81	%
John Hancock High Yield Fund(2)		18,487		13.21	%		300,282	(7)		18.70	%		—		—		318,769		14.90	%		10.90	%
John Hancock Strategic Income Fund(2)		8,565		6.12	%		164,947			10.27	%		—		—		173,512		8.11	%		10.71	%

47

Name, Position and Address of Beneficial Owner	Series A-1 Common Stock					Series A-1 Preferred Stock					Series A-2 Preferred Stock						Total					Voting(10)
	Number Beneficially Owned		% of Total Series A-1 Common Stock			Number Beneficially Owned		% of Total Series A-1 Preferred Stock			Number Beneficially Owned			% of Total Series A-2 Preferred Stock			Total Number of Capital Stock Beneficially Owned		% of Total Capital Stock			% of Voting Capital Stock
Oppenheimer Strategic Income Fund(3) (4)		8,268		5.91	%		109,250		6.80	%		—			—			117,518		5.49	%		7.26	%
Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund(4)		3,150		2.25	%		41,630		2.59	%		—			—			44,780		2.09	%		2.76	%
Oppenheimer Strategic Bond Fund V/A(4)		3,451		2.47	%		45,600		2.84	%		—			—			49,051		2.29	%		3.03	%
Oppenheimer High Income Fund V/A(4)		874		0.62	%		11,550		0.72	%		—			—			12,424		0.58	%		0.77	%
ING Oppenheimer Strategic Income Port(4)		549		0.39	%		7,250		0.45	%		—			—			7,799		0.36	%		0.48	%
Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.(4)		16,292		11.64	%		215,280		13.41	%		—			—			231,572		10.81	%		14.30	%
Brigade Leveraged Capital Structures Fund Ltd(5)		12,876		9.20	%		94,999		5.92	%		210,894	(8)		53.57	%		318,769		14.90	%		7.41	%
Brigade Capital Management, LLC(5)		12,876		9.20	%		94,999		5.92	%		210,894	(8)		53.57	%		318,769		14.90	%		7.41	%
SOLA Ltd(6)		—		—			136,000		8.47	%		182,769	(9)		46.43	%		318,769		14.90	%		8.65	%
Solus Core Opportunities Master Fund Ltd(6)		—		—			155,000		9.65	%		—			—			155,000		7.25	%		9.57	%

(1)	On the Effective Date, Mr. Boyer will be receiving (i) restricted stock of Greektown Superholdings valued at $112,500, which will vest quarterly over the 12-month period following the Effective Date and (ii) restricted stock of Greektown Superholdings valued at $225,000, which will vest ratably over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the Effective Date. The number of shares he will be receiving cannot be determined at the date this report is filed.
(2)	Address: 101 Huntington Avenue, H-7, Boston, MA 02199.
(3)	Address: 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, CO 80112.
(4)	Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. is the beneficial owner of all the shares held by Oppenheimer Strategic Income Fund, Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund, Oppenheimer Strategic Bond Fund V/A, Oppenheimer High Income Fund V/A and ING Oppenheimer Strategic Income Portfolio and shares 100% of the power to vote on the shares held by each of these four funds with each such fund. Address: 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, CO 80112. The number of shares reported in the above table under the row of Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. includes, and reflects the aggregate number of, shares held by Oppenheimer Strategic Income Fund, Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund, Oppenheimer Strategic Bond Fund V/A, Oppenheimer High Income Fund V/A and ING Oppenheimer Strategic Income Portfolio.
(5)	Brigade Capital Management, LLC is the beneficial owner of all the shares held by Brigade Leveraged Capital Structures Fund Ltd. The number of shares reported in the above table under the row of Brigade Capital Management, LLC includes the number of shares held by Brigade Leveraged Capital Structures Fund Ltd. Address: 399 Park Avenue, 16th Floor, New York, New York 10022.
(6)	Address: 430 Park Avenue, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10022.
(7)	Includes warrants to acquire 142,190 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock exercisable within 60 days of the Effective Date.
(8)	Includes warrants to acquire 89,218 shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock exercisable within 60 days of the Effective Date.
(9)	Includes warrants to acquire 142,190 shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock exercisable within 60 days of the Effective Date.
(10)	The voting percentages differ from the beneficial ownership percentages in the total capital stock because (i) different series of shares of Greektown Superholdings have different voting rights, and (ii) no capital stock underlying any Warrants (as defined in Item 11—“Description of the Registrant’s Securities To Be Registered”), regardless of when exercisable, were included in the calculation of the voting percentage as the Warrants do not entitle the holder to any voting rights. For further description of the different voting rights by different series of shares, please see: Item 11—“Description of the Registrant’s Securities To Be Registered.”

48

ITEM 5. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth the individuals that we anticipate will be members of the Board as of the Effective Date. As of March 26, 2010, George Boyer is the sole member of the Board and will be sole member of the Board until the Effective Date. Appointment of each of these individuals as members of the Board as of the Effective Date is contingent on MGCB approval of such director prior to such individual’s appointment. To the extent the MGCB does not approve any of these individuals prior to the Effective Date, such individual will be appointed to our Board following approval by the MGCB, and to the extent any individual is rejected by the MGCB, such individual will not serve on the Board.

Name	Age		Position
John Bitove		49	Director
George Boyer		58	Director
Michael E. Duggan		51	Director
Benjamin C. Duster, IV		49	Director
Joel I. Ferguson		71	Director
Freman Hendrix		59	Director
Yvette E. Landau		53	Director

Director Biographies

John Bitove. Mr. Bitove has been Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of DAVE Wireless, Inc., a startup national wireless telecom company in Canada, since 2009. Mr. Bitove has also been the Executive Chairman of Canadian Satellite Radio Holdings (CSR) Inc. (TSX: XSR), which operates as XM Canada, broadcasts across Canada and programs 13 Canadian channels that are carried in the United States, since 2005. He has also been the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Scott’s Real Estate Investment Trust (TSX: SRQ.UN), a Canadian “small-box” retail property owner which currently owns and leases 207 commercial properties in major provinces across Canada since 2005, and the Executive Chairman of Priszm Income Fund (TSX: QSR.UN), which owns and operates over 400 KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut restaurants in seven provinces in Canada, since 1999. Mr. Bitove was the volunteer President and Chief Executive Officer of Toronto’s bid for 2008 Olympic Games and was the head of the organizing committees that brought the World Indoor Athletics Championships and World Championships of Basketball to Canada in 1993 and 1994. In 1993, he founded the Toronto Raptors of the NBA and created the Air Canada Centre, Toronto’s major indoor sports and entertainment venue, in which he sold his interests in 1997.

George Boyer.Mr. Boyer was President and Chief Operating Officer of MGM Grand Detroit from 2002 to 2008 and a member of the development team for the permanent casino, which opened in 2007. Previously, he served as President of another MGM Mirage subsidiary company and held other senior leadership positions in Las Vegas. MGM Mirage is an entertainment company headquartered in Las Vegas that owns resort-casinos, restaurants, residential living and retail departments in Nevada and Michigan. Before Mr. Boyer joined the gaming industry, he held various audit positions at the Philadelphia Stock Exchange and the United States General Accounting Office from 1976 through 1986. Currently, Mr. Boyer is also an audit committee member and director of First Mercury Financial Corporation (NYSE: FMR), a property and casualty insurance company based in Southfield, Michigan.

Michael E. Duggan. Mr. Duggan has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Detroit Medical Center since January 2004, overseeing eight hospitals and 12,000 employees. Prior to that, Mr. Duggan served as the Wayne County Prosecutor from 2001 to 2003. From 1987 to 2000, Mr. Duggan was Deputy Wayne County Executive, during which period he oversaw ten departments and 6,000 employees with an annual budget of $1.5 billion. In 1995, Mr. Duggan was appointed by Governor John Engler as one of the eleven members of the Governor’s Blue Ribbon Commission on Casino Gaming. The Commission recommended that Michigan allow the construction of three new casinos in the City of Detroit, a recommendation that became the basis of the 1996 statewide ballot initiative that authorized the Detroit casinos.

49

Benjamin C. Duster, IV. Mr. Duster specializes as an independent director on the boards of public companies undergoing or contemplating transforming organizational change requiring the development and/or implementation of new managerial, operational and strategic initiatives. He is currently Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Netia, SA, an operator of fixed telephony services based in Poland. From 2002 until its sale to Essar Steel in 2007, Mr. Duster served as Chairman of the Board of Algoma Steel, a CAD$1.9 billion integrated steel producer based in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. From 1997 to 2001, Mr. Duster was Managing Director at Wachovia Securities, responsible for building and leading its mergers and acquisitions advisory practice. From 1989 to 1997, Mr. Duster was Vice President, Mergers and Acquisitions at Salomon Brothers, specializing in bankruptcy reorganizations, financial restructurings and troubled company acquisitions. Mr. Duster’s publicly listed directorships include Jazz Air (JAZ.UN:TSX), a Canadian airline, RCN Corporation (RCNI:NASDAQ), a fiber based internet and high capacity data services provider, and Catalyst Paper (CTL:TSX), a pulp and paper producer.

Joel I. Ferguson.Mr. Ferguson is Chairman of Ferguson Development, LLC, a real estate development company and a Director of Maxco, Inc., a holding company with investments in real estate and other minority interest in various businesses. Mr. Ferguson has served on the board of directors of Capitol Bancorp Ltd. (NYSE: CBC) since 1988. Capitol Bancorp Ltd. is multi-billion dollar bank holding company that manages and operates community banks. Mr. Ferguson has been chairperson of the Michigan State University Board of Trustees since 1992. In 1995, President Clinton appointed Mr. Ferguson a member of the Board of Directors of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company. In 1980, Mr. Ferguson was the founder, owner and president of two television stations: WLAJ-TV, Lansing’s ABC affiliate, and WFSL-TV, a Lansing independent affiliate.

Freman Hendrix.Mr. Hendrix has been President of Advanced Security & Investigative Solutions, a uniformed security guard company, since 2006. From 2006 to 2009, he was Chief Government Relations Officer and Administrator at Eastern Michigan University. Prior to that, Mr. Hendrix served as Chief Operations Officer at Strategic Staffing Solutions, a Detroit-based information technology staffing and solutions company, from 2001 to 2004. Mr. Hendrix was also formerly Chief of Staff and Deputy Mayor of Detroit, overseeing 43 departments and 17,000 employees. Prior to that, Mr. Hendrix held various positions in Wayne County government, including Director of Community Development and Assistant County Executive for Legislative Affairs.

Yvette E. Landau. Since April 2005, Ms. Landau has been a co-owner of W. A. Richardson Builders, LLC, which provides general casino advisory, general contracting, construction management, and purchasing services to casino resorts. Ms. Landau was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Mandalay Resort Group, a formerly NYSE listed company that owned various casino resort properties, from 1996 to April 2005 when it was acquired by MGM Mirage and previously served as Associate General Counsel of Mandalay Resort Group from 1993. Mandalay Resort Group owned 16 casinos in four jurisdictions, with over $2.5 billion in revenues, 28,000 hotel rooms and 35,000 employees. Ms. Landau currently has served on the Board of Trustees of the International Association of Gaming Advisors and was the president of the organization in 2007. From 1984 to 1993, she practiced law at Snell & Wilmer in Phoenix, Arizona as an associate and then partner.

Other than Mr. Boyer, who is serving as the sole member of the Board until the Effective Date, none of the above directors has served on the board of Greektown Superholdings or its predecessor during any period prior to the Effective Date. All of Greektown Superholdings’ directors will serve on the Board until their resignation, permanent incapacitation, death or removal. According to the terms of the Bylaws of Greektown Superholdings, directors will be elected to the Board only upon the vote of a plurality of the votes cast and entitled to vote on the election of directors and will be removed from the Board only by the holders of a majority in voting power of the shares of capital stock of Greektown Superholdings then entitled to vote at an election of directors. The Board has the right (but not the obligation) to create and disband board committees and to determine the duties, responsibilities, activities and composition of board committees. There are presently no board committees. Mr. Hendrix is elected to the board to satisfy our obligation under the Amended Settlement Agreement to maintain one director from the City of Detroit reasonably acceptable to

50

the Mayor and City Council of Detroit or an unpaid ombudsman with the right to attend board meetings.

Board Qualifications

We believe that each of the above individuals who will become a member of our board upon the Effective Date has the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that make him or her suitable to serve as our director, in light of our highly regulated casino and hotel business, our complex operations and large number of employees, as well as the unique circumstance of our company, as we are just emerging out of a bankruptcy and restructuring proceeding. Mr. Bitove’s extensive executive experience and knowledge in real estate and entertainment business, including both public and private companies, will provide a valuable contribution to the board, particularly in the areas of the client base, prospects, strategic marketplace and competitors of our casino and hotel businesses. His leadership skills and experience will also benefit our company at this challenging time. Mr. Boyer, being a former executive at MGM Mirage and President and COO of MGM Grand Detroit, brings critical knowledge and experience to our board that is directly relevant to our business, our operation and our market. In addition, Mr. Boyer’s experience on the board and audit committee on a public company and his experience as an auditor is relevant to us as our securities will be registered with the SEC, and his professional judgment and risk assessment skills as a result of such experience benefits our company directly. Mr. Duggan’s executive experience in both business and local government sectors and expertise in managing a large number of employees will provide an incredible contribution to our board, particularly in the areas of local client base, strategic direction, and regulatory compliance, which is crucial for our gaming business. Mr. Duster’s extensive knowledge in finance, restructuring and investment banking based on his long-term experience in those sectors will contribute significantly to the board and to our business, particularly as we are emerging out of a bankruptcy and restructuring proceeding. Mr. Ferguson, being a seasoned real estate developer and investor and a former board member of public and private companies, has valuable knowledge of real estate, marketplace, client base, competitors and strategic planning that are important to our casino and hotel business. Mr. Hendrix’s executive and management experience in public and private sectors, knowledge of government relations and capability to manage complex organizations and a large number of employees are valuable to our board, particularly in the areas of employees, business operations and regulatory compliance. Ms. Landau’s extensive knowledge of casino business and operations, including public and privately owned casinos, is directly relevant to our business and will contribute significantly to our board. In addition, her legal background and familiarity with a broad range of board functions contribute to her judgment and risk management skills, which will benefit the board in its deliberation process. We believe these qualifications will bring a broad set of complementary experience to the board’s discharge of its responsibilities.

We have no formal policy regarding board diversity. Our priority in selection of board members is identification of members who will further the interests of our stockholders through their management experience, knowledge of our business, understanding of the competitive landscape, familiarity with our targeted markets and experience with the regulatory framework to which we are subject.

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

Currently Mr. Boyer is the sole member on our board and will be chairman of our board following the Effective Date. In addition, we expect that each of the President, Chief Financial Officer and secretary and the vice president will report directly to our board. We have not otherwise established a board leadership structure as of the date of this report; however, we plan to establish a leadership structure within a reasonable time frame after the full board is elected. We expect to set up a board leadership structure that is commonly utilized by companies similar to us and that is effective and appropriate for our business. Our entire board will be actively involved in overseeing our risk management. For example, we anticipate that the board will engage in periodic discussions with our officers and outside management company as the board deems necessary, including our

51

principal executive and accounting officers and our legal counsel. Our goal is to set up a leadership structure that will support effective risk management oversight.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the individuals who will be the executive officers of Greektown Superholdings as of the Effective Date and their respective positions:

Name	Age	Position
Cliff J. Vallier	50	President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Salvatore Semola	55	Vice President

Management Biographies

Cliff J. Vallier.Mr. Vallier will serve as President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Greektown Superholdings as of the Effective Date. Mr. Vallier has been the Chief Executive Officer of Greektown LLC since January 2010, the Chief Financial Officer and Assistant General Manager of Greektown LLC and Greektown Holdings since December 2006, and was also the interim CEO of each entity from November 2008 until April 2009. He also served as Vice President of Finance of Greektown LLC from February 2004 to December 2006 and as Senior Director of Finance of Greektown LLC from July 2002 to February 2004.

Salvatore Semola.Mr. Semola will serve as Vice President of Greektown Superholdings as of the Effective Date. Mr. Semola has been an executive officer of Warner Gaming since February 2009 and currently is President of WG-Michigan. Mr. Semola will remain employed by WG-Michigan while serving as our vice president. Mr. Semola also served as Chief Operating Officer from April 2001 to March 2004 and Vice President of Table Games at Greektown Casino from March 1999 to March 2001. Prior to that, he was Vice President and General Manager of Rampart Casino from October 2004 to February 2008 and Vice President and General Manager of Eastside Cannery Casino from February 2008 to November 2008, both of which are managed and owned by Cannery Casino Resorts.

Messrs. Vallier and Semola will serve in office until the date they resign or their respective successors are appointed by the board.

ITEM 6. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The decisions relating to compensation for Greektown LLC’s executive officers for 2008 and 2009 occurred prior to the Effective Date. The following discussion therefore reflects the policies and decision making processes in effect prior to that date. We have not determined what changes, if any, we will make to these policies and processes upon our acquisition of Greektown LLC.

The board of managers of Greektown LLC is authorized to review and approve annually all compensation decisions relating to the executive officers of Greektown Casino. This section explains how Greektown LLC’s compensation program is structured for its Chief Financial Officer and the other executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table (the “named executive officers”).

Compensation Objectives and Philosophy for Named Executive Officers

Greektown LLC does not have a formal compensation philosophy for its compensation program for the named executive officers, but generally the program is designed to provide total compensation that is both fair and competitive based on the collective experience of our board and Chief Executive Officer (see “Directors and Executive Officers—Director Biographies and Board Qualifications” above for further discussion of the members of the board) and in light of the skills, knowledge and experience of our executive officers, in order to attract and retain key executives. In establishing compensation for named executive officers, the board of managers and/or the Chief

52

Executive Officer may consider individual performance reviews and experience, Greektown LLC’s performance on a short-term and long-term basis, external market pressures caused by our competitors in the same geographic area and hiring and retention needs.

Determining Compensation for Named Executive Officers

In 2007 and 2008, management made recommendations to the board of managers of Greektown LLC regarding annual compensation for the executive officers of Greektown LLC and the board of managers of Greektown LLC reviewed and approved all compensation decisions relating to the executive officers during such periods. The Chief Executive Officer did not use a compensation consultant to establish or administer the executive compensation program for 2009, nor did it engage in benchmarking to determine the amount or elements of executive compensation.

Elements of Compensation for 2009 for Named Executive Officers

Greektown LLC’s compensation program for 2009 for the named executive officers generally consisted of base salaries and quarterly bonuses based upon performance. Base salaries are provided as compensation for day-to-day responsibilities and services to Greektown LLC and to meet the objective of attracting and retaining key executives needed to run the business. The quarterly bonus program is provided to link a portion of executive total compensation to achievement in reaching or exceeding established quarterly performance goals for Greektown LLC. See “Changes to 2009 Compensation for Named Executive Officers” below for a detailed discussion of the quarterly bonus program. In 2008, the board of managers of Greektown LLC determined not to increase the base salaries of the named executive officers in the beginning of 2009 and the Chief Executive Officer decided to decrease the base salaries of the named executive officers effective as of April, 2009.

Greektown LLC offers additional benefits designed to be competitive with overall market practices, and to attract and retain talented and capable personnel. The named executive officers are eligible to participate in our general benefit programs which we maintain for our eligible employees. The programs include health care, dental and vision coverage, life, accidental death and dismemberment and long-term disability insurance, and paid holidays. Greektown LLC also made matching contributions to employees’ 401(k) accounts through December 2008, at which time the matching contribution was terminated for all employees in an effort to conserve cash.

Greektown LLC does not maintain a defined benefit pension plan or a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. None of the named executive officers received any equity-based compensation in 2009 nor were any named executive officers a party to any employment, severance or change of control agreements.

Changes to 2009 Compensation for Named Executive Officers

On November 1, 2008, Craig Ghelfi, the Chief Executive Officer of Greektown LLC resigned. On December 31, 2008, Greektown LLC entered into the Fine Point Consulting Agreement with Fine Point. After the approval of the MGCB on April 20, 2009, Fine Point’s Managing Director, Randall A. Fine, was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Greektown LLC. Other employees of Fine Point also served as executive officers of Greektown LLC. In order to satisfy regulatory requirements, Greektown LLC paid a nominal salary of $24,000 a year plus a gross up for income taxes to each of these Fine Point employees. Amounts that Greektown LLC paid to these Fine Point employees were offset against the fees that Greektown LLC paid to Fine Point under the Fine Point Consulting Agreement. Fine Point also paid a salary to its employees who were serving as executive officers of Greektown LLC. Greektown LLC did not have any input into the salary paid by Fine Point to its employees, as Fine Point had sole discretion with respect to its own employee compensation. The Fine Point Consulting Agreement expired on December 31, 2009.

On April 1, 2009, the Chief Executive Officer of Greektown LLC implemented a quarterly bonus program for the 50 most highly compensated employees. The goal of the bonus program was to link a portion of these employees’ total compensation to achievements in meeting or exceeding established quarterly goals for Greektown LLC’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,

53

amortization and reorganization costs (“EBITDAR”). The base salaries of those participating in the 2009 bonus program were reduced by 10% to 30%, with the reduction depending on the employee’s level of responsibility and amount of base salary. The amount of the 2009 target bonus for an employee was between 10% and 50% of the employee’s reduced base salary, with the amount depending upon the employee’s level of responsibility and amount of base salary. Officers that were employees of Fine Point were not eligible to participate in the bonus program.

The salary reduction and amount of target bonus as a percentage of reduced based salary for each of the named executive officers that are eligible to participate in the bonus program and that are employed by us as of the date of this registration statement are shown in the table below:

Name	Original Base Salary (Before 4/1/2009)		Reduced Base Salary (After 4/1/2009)		Target Bonus ($)		Amount of Target Bonus as a Percentage of Reduced Base Salary (%)
Cliff Vallier		362,513		253,759		126,879		50
William Williams		259,524		181,667		72,667		40
Jason Pasko		168,834		126,625		37,988		30

The 2009 target bonus was earned based on performance against the EBITDAR goal set by the Chief Executive Officer. The target EBITDAR was 150% of the budgeted EBITDAR, which means that employees were entitled to 100% of their bonus if actual EBITDAR was 150% of budgeted EBITDAR. Employees were entitled to earn (i) more than the target bonus (up to a maximum set by the Chief Executive Officer of 280% of the target bonus) if the EBITDAR target was exceeded, (ii) less than the target bonus award if EBITDAR was not achieved at the target level but achieved above a threshold level set by the Chief Executive Officer (which is 110% of budgeted EBITDAR), and (iii) no bonus if EBITDAR failed to meet the threshold level of performance. In determining actual awards under the bonus program, neither the board of directors nor the Chief Executive Officer has discretion to change the amount of awards. Awards were measured and paid on a quarterly basis. In 2009, the target EBITDAR was $45.0 million and the actual EBITDAR achieved was $70.98 million.

The Chief Executive Officer believes that one of the most important measurements of Greektown LLC’s performance is its ability to service its obligations and that EBITDAR is the most appropriate measurement of free cash flow for that purpose. Maximum levels and potential payouts were established to encourage above-goal performance and results that exceed expectations. Similarly, we believe that if we do not meet goals that are established to generate cash flow, management incentive payments should be reduced accordingly.

Greektown Superholdings plans to establish its compensation policy, including consideration for elements such as risk management, following the Effective Date.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth all compensation paid to or earned by the named executive officers of Greektown LLC in the last three fiscal years.

Name and Position	Year		Salary ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(1)		Total ($)
Randall A. Fine(2)		2009		20,769		—		20,769
		2008		—		—		—
		2007		—		—		—
Cliff Vallier(3), Chief Financial Officer of Greektown Holdings and Greektown Casino		2009		283,039		114,192		397,231
		2008		362,514		—		362,514
		2007		360,707		—		362,514
William M. Williams, Vice President of Guest Services of Greektown LLC		2009		202,628		65,400		268,028
		2008		256,034		—		256,034
		2007		248,577		—		251,964

54

Name and Position	Year		Salary ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(1)		Total ($)
Jason Pasko, Senior Director of Finance of Greektown LLC		2009		137,989		34,188		172,177
		2008		168,834		—		168,834
		2007		133,419		—		133,419

(1)	Represents the amount of annual bonus the named executive officers received under the quarterly bonus program.
(2)	Mr. Fine served as Chief Executive Officer of Greektown LLC from April 21, 2009 through December 31, 2009.
(3)	Mr. Vallier served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Greektown LLC from November 1, 2008 until April 20, 2009.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table sets forth grants of awards made to the named executive officers of Greektown LLC in fiscal 2009 under the quarterly bonus program.

Name	Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
	Threshold ($)(1)		Target ($)(2)		Maximum(3)
Randall A. Fine		—		—		—
Cliff Vallier, Chief Financial Officer of Greektown Holdings and Greektown Casino		25,376		126,879		355,263
William M. Williams, Vice President of Guest Services of Greektown LLC		14,533		72,667		203,467
Jason Pasko, Senior Director of Finance of Greektown LLC		7,598		37,988		106,365

(1)	Represents the minimum amount payable for a certain level of EBITDAR performance under the quarterly bonus program.
(2)	Represents the amount payable if the specified EBITDAR performance target is reached.
(3)	Represents the maximum payout possible under the quarterly bonus program.

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth the compensation of directors of Greektown LLC for fiscal 2009.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1)		Total ($)
Jacob Miklojcik		82,500		82,500
D. Joe McCoy		82,500		82,500
Louis Glazier		82,500		82,500

⁽¹⁾ Represents fees paid to the directors whose terms began in February 2009. Pursuant to the board service agreements between the directors and Greektown LLC in 2009, each director was entitled to a $7,500 monthly fee. The monthly fee was increased to $10,000 per month in 2010.

None of the above directors is, or upon the Effective Date, will become a director of Greektown Superholdings or a director of Greektown LLC following the Effective Date.

Pursuant to the Indemnification Agreement, dated March 31, 2010, among Greektown Superholdings, George Boyer and certain of the Put Parties (the “Boyer Indemnification Agreement”), beginning as of the Effective Date, Mr. Boyer, as chairman of the board of directors, will be entitled to an annual retainer of $225,000, payable 50% in cash and 50% in restricted stock, which will vest quarterly over a one-year period. In addition, on the Effective Date, Mr. Boyer will receive a one-time grant of restricted stock valued at $225,000, which will vest ratably over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the Effective Date. The compensation for the other

55

directors of Greektown Superholdings will be determined by the Board of Directors upon their appointment as of the Effective Date.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No Board member is or has been an officer or employee of Greektown or any of its affiliates. Additionally, in 2009, none of the executive officers of Greektown served on the board or compensation committee (or committee performing equivalent functions) of any other company that had one or more executive officers serving on the Board.

ITEM 7. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Related Person Transaction Policy

Greektown LLC has established a policy that provides that each related person transaction or series of related transactions reasonably anticipated to exceed $50,000 annually is subject to approval by the board of managers of Greektown LLC. Quarterly and annual updates are provided to the board for its continuing oversight. The board of managers seeks to ensure that Greektown LLC’s involvement is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party and is in its best interest.

Greektown LLC has a related person transaction policy regarding vendor and supplier relationships with Greektown LLC. Further, employees (and any relatives of employees) are prohibited from engaging in business with Greektown Casino. Employees are required to be forthcoming regarding all relationships with vendors or suppliers and must immediately inform our compliance department of their ownership and/or their relative’s ownership in a vendor or supplier providing goods or services to Greektown Casino. Employees who wish to engage in business (directly or indirectly) with Greektown Casino must resign as an employee. Failure to comply with the policy will result in disciplinary action up to and potentially including termination of employment and termination of any related vendor agreements with Greektown Casino.

Any third party vendor or supplier to Greektown LLC is subject to the licensure requirements of the MGCB, unless deemed exempt. The MGCB generally does not review the substance of the contracts, but the MGCB has the right to conduct an investigation if it determines that a proper bid process was not conducted, the contract is commercially unreasonable or the contract is related to an improper subject matter. The MGCB may impose disciplinary measures against Greektown LLC in respect of such investigation. In the event a former employee’s required vendor or supplier license (or exemption from obtaining a vendor or supplier license) is withdrawn, revoked or suspended by the MGCB, any related vendor or supplier agreements will automatically be terminated by Greektown Casino.

Transactions with Related Persons

Post-Effective Date Related Person Transactions

Warner Gaming Management Agreement. As of the Effective Date, WG-Michigan of which Mr. Salvatore Semola, our Vice President as of the Effective Date, is the President, will administer, control and conduct all aspects of the operations of Greektown Casino in accordance with the terms of the Warner Gaming Management Agreement, which is currently being negotiated. The summary below is based on a term sheet agreed upon in connection with the Plan and the actual terms of the Warner Gaming Management Agreement may differ materially from those set forth in the summary below.

•

  

Term and Termination. It is anticipated that the Warner Gaming Management Agreement will expire upon the third anniversary of the date of the Warner Gaming Management Agreement and that it may be earlier terminated (1) by Greektown Superholdings at any time for “cause”, or (2) by Greektown Superholdings without cause after 15 months for a payment equal to the lesser of (i) the fee earned for the last 12 months, or (ii) the fee earned for the last 12 months prorated for the remaining term of the contract if less than one year. “Cause”

56

	includes WG-Michigan not receiving requisite gaming licenses or WG-Michigan not meeting certain financial performance goals.
•	Services. It is anticipated that the Warner Gaming Management Agreement will provide that WG-Michigan will be responsible for managing the day to day operations of Greektown Casino on behalf and for the account of Greektown Superholdings. WG-Michigan will provide Greektown Superholdings with senior management personnel to provide executive management services. It is expected that as of the Effective Date, WG-Michigan will provide one of its members or full-time employees to serve as the general manager of Greektown.
•	Payment. It is anticipated that the Warner Gaming Management Agreement will provide that (a) WG-Michigan will receive $150,000 per month for its services (the “Base Fee”), provided that the Base Fee will be prorated for any partial months. Additionally, WG-Michigan is entitled to quarterly “success fee” payments, with the amount of success fee payments conditioned upon Greektown Superholdings exceeding certain established financial performance goals provided in the Warner Gaming Management Agreement and (b) WG-Michigan will also be entitled to the reimbursement of all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing its duties under the Warner Gaming Management Agreement, including, without limitation, any expenses related to licensing and regulatory compliance necessary to carry out its duties under the Warner Gaming Management Agreement, but excluding living expenses for on-site employees and members of WG-Michigan.
•	Exclusivity and Non-Compete. It is anticipated that the Warner Gaming Management Agreement will provide that during its term, WG-Michigan and its affiliates will not own, operate and/or manage other gaming facilities, and will not pursue other gaming opportunities, within a 200 mile radius of Greektown; provided that WG-Michigan and its affiliates will otherwise be free to own, operate and/or manage other gaming and non-gaming facilities, and to pursue other gaming and non-gaming opportunities in any other jurisdiction.

Boyer and Vallier Indemnification Agreements.Greektown Superholdings, George Boyer and certain of the Put Parties have entered into the Boyer Indemnification Agreement pursuant to which Mr. Boyer will be indemnified for claims brought against him in his capacity as sole director of Greektown Superholdings until the Effective Date. In addition, Greektown Superholdings, Cliff Vallier and certain of the Put Parties have entered into an Indemnification Agreement, dated March 31, 2010 (the “Vallier Indemnification Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Vallier will be indemnified for claims brought against him in his capacity as President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Greektown Superholdings until the Effective Date.

Pre-Effective Date Related Person Transactions

As previously discussed, as of the Effective Date, Greektown Superholdings will, directly and indirectly, hold all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of Greektown Holdings, which holds all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of Greektown LLC. However, prior to the Effective Date, the direct and indirect ownership of Greektown Holdings is as follows:

• Kewadin Greektown and Monroe, collectively, hold 100% of Greektown Holdings’ membership interests.

• The majority of Monroe’s membership interests are held by Kewadin Greektown (approximately 97.2%) and the remaining membership interests are held by a group of investors, which includes Ted Gatzaros, a former member of the Greektown LLC board, and Marvin W. Beatty, a former member of the boards of Greektown LLC and Greektown Holdings.

• Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority (“Kewadin Authority”) holds 100% of Kewadin Greektown’s membership interests.

• Kewadin Authority is 100% owned by the Tribe.

The following discussion describes transactions with certain of these related persons, among others, occurring since the beginning of 2007. Upon the Effective Date, Kewadin Greektown, Kewadin Authority, Monroe and the Tribe will no longer be related persons to Greektown since their equity interests in Greektown LLC are being cancelled in the bankruptcy.

57

Equity Contributions from Kewadin Greektown.In November 2007, Kewadin Greektown made a $35 million equity contribution to Greektown Holdings to cure non-compliance with certain financial covenants under the Pre-petition Credit Facility. Additionally, Kewadin Greektown made equity contributions of $600,000, $10 million and $1.5 million to Greektown Holdings for construction fees related to construction of the Expanded Complex in January 2008, March 2008 and May 2008, respectively.

Management Agreement with the Tribe. Greektown LLC was a party to a management services agreement (the “Tribe Services Agreement”) with the Tribe in January 2001, which required Greektown LLC to pay the Tribe a base management fee of $110,000 per month (the “Management Fee”), as well as reimbursement of travel, lodging and out-of-pocket expenses incurred and all reasonable salary costs and fringe benefit expenses of key personnel. Total fees paid pursuant to the Tribe Services Agreement were not to exceed $2 million annually (the “Fee Cap”). The Management Fee and Fee Cap were adjusted annually to reflect any change in the Consumer Price Index. The total expense incurred by Greektown LLC in connection with the Tribe Service Agreement for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $1.3 million. The Tribe Services Agreement was rejected pursuant to an order entered by the Bankruptcy Court on October 27, 2008 and payments pursuant to this agreement are no longer allowable.

Certain Business Transactions with Related Persons. Greektown LLC periodically enters into certain business transactions with persons related to the direct or indirect owners of Greektown Holdings. Since 2007, Greektown LLC has entered into the following related person transactions:

• Greektown LLC has entered into various transactions with New Millennium Advisors, LLC to purchase uniforms used in the operation of Greektown Casino (e.g., uniforms for dealers, kitchen staff, security, etc.) which totaled approximately $129,000, $83,000 and $1,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. New Millennium Advisors, LLC is owned, in whole or in part, by Marvin Beatty, a former director of Greektown Holdings and Greektown LLC and current member of Monroe. The agreement with New Millennium Advisors, LLC was rejected in the bankruptcy court and therefore will not continue after the Effective Date.

• Customers of Greektown Casino have the ability to earn food comps for use at Fishbones, an upscale seafood restaurant located near Greektown Casino. Greektown reimburses Fishbones at a discounted rate for the costs to Fishbones of providing food to customers redeeming the comps. Greektown LLC expenses with respect to the Fishbones comps totaled approximately $1 million and $672,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Fishbones is owned in part by Ted Gatzaros, a former director of Greektown LLC and current member of Monroe.

• Customers of Greektown Casino have the ability to earn hotel comps for use at the Atheneum Suite Hotel, an all-suite hotel located near Greektown Casino. Greektown reimburses the Atheneum Suite Hotel at a discounted rate for the hotel’s providing lodging to customers redeeming the comps. Greektown LLC expenses with respect to the Atheneum Suite Hotel comps totaled approximately $306,000 and $169,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The Atheneum Suite Hotel is owned in part by Ted Gatzaros, a former director of Greektown LLC and current member of Monroe. The agreement with Atheneum Suite Hotel has been terminated.

Accounts Receivable with Monroe. “Accounts Receivable—Monroe” includes $298,000 as of December 31, 2008 for amounts due from Monroe for historical tax distributions made by Greektown LLC.

Fine Point Consulting Agreement. In 2009, Greektown Holdings entered into the Fine Point Consulting Agreement with Fine Point, whose Managing Director, Randall A. Fine, was our Chief Executive Officer from April 21, 2009 to December 31, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2009, Greektown Holdings paid Fine Point $6.2 million in success fees, which was calculated on a quarterly basis, based on an EBITDAR target. For additional information regarding the payments to Fine Point, please see Note 11—Commitments and Contingenciesto the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 13 of this registration statement.

58

Director Independence

For purposes of this registration statement, the independence of our directors is determined under the corporate governance rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The independence rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market include a series of objective tests, including that an “independent” person will not be employed by us and will not be engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, the Board is required to make a subjective determination as to each person that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the person’s responsibilities. It has been determined that each of the directors to be appointed to the Board as of the Effective Date is an independent person.

ITEM 8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Legal Proceedings

We are party to various legal and governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business in addition to the current bankruptcy proceedings described in Item 1—“Business.” We believe that the pending ordinary course claims will be resolved in the bankruptcy proceedings and will not, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 9. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

There currently is no, and we do not anticipate a, public market for any of our Common Stock or Preferred Stock. We do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 10. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

On the Effective Date, we will issue shares of Common Stock and shares of Preferred Stock to the holders of indebtedness of Greektown LLC pursuant to the Plan. This issuance is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code.

On the Effective Date, we will issue shares of Preferred Stock to certain of the Put Parties pursuant to the Purchase and Put Agreement. The shares to be issued under the Purchase and Put Agreement will be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933. Greektown Superholdings did not engage in any public advertising or general solicitation in connection with the issuance of such shares. All the offerees of such shares are accredited investors, as that term is defined under Regulation D.

ITEM 11. DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED

Common Stock

Greektown Superholdings is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock, which are being registered by this registration statement. A total of 4,354,935 shares of Greektown Superholdings’ Common Stock are designated as a series known as Series A-1 Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series A-1 Common Stock”), and a total of 645,065 shares of Greektown Superholdings’ Common Stock are designated as a series known as Series A-2 Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series A-2 Common Stock”). Each share of Series A-1 Common Stock represents the same economic interest in Greektown Superholdings as each share of Series A-2 Common Stock and such shares differ only with respect to voting rights as set forth below in this Item 11. Our Certificate of Incorporation, which is attached to this registration statement, provides further information regarding our Common Stock and qualifies the summary under Item 11 of this registration statement in its entirety.

59

Preferred Stock

Also, Greektown Superholdings is authorized to issue 2,333,333 shares of Preferred Stock, which are being registered by this registration statement. A total of 1,688,268 shares of Greektown Superholdings’ Preferred Stock are designated as a series known as Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series A-1 Preferred Stock”), and a total of 645,065 shares of Greektown Superholdings’ Preferred Stock are designated as a series known as Series A-2 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series A-2 Preferred Stock”; together with the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, the “Series A Preferred Stock”). A holder’s shares of Series A Preferred Stock are voluntarily convertible at the election of such holder at any time after the date that is the six-month anniversary of the date on which Greektown Superholdings first issues Series A Preferred Stock and all shares of Series A Preferred Stock are mandatorily convertible upon the vote or written consent of 66 2/3% of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock (with each holder of Series A-1 Preferred Stock and each holder of Series A-2 Preferred Stock entitled to cast one vote with respect to each share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock or Series A-2 Preferred Stock held by such holder) voting together as a single class. Each share of Series A-1 Preferred is convertible into the lesser of (i) such number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Series A-1 Common Stock as is determined by dividing (A) the sum of $100 per share of Series A Preferred Stock plus an amount equal to the aggregate amount of accrued but unpaid dividends per share of Series A Preferred Stock whether or not declared and subject to certain adjustments (the “Series A Reference Price”) by (B) the Series A Conversion Price (defined below) in effect at the time of conversion, and (ii) the maximum number of shares of Series A-1 Common Stock that can be issued to such holder in accordance with the Certificate of Incorporation and in compliance with the requirements of the MGCB. Each share of Series A-2 Preferred Stock is convertible into the lesser of (i) such number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Series A-2 Common Stock as is determined by dividing the Series A Reference Price by the Series A Conversion Price in effect at the time of conversion and (ii) the maximum number of shares of Series A-2 Common Stock that can be issued to such holder in accordance with the Certificate of Incorporation and in compliance with the requirements of the MGCB. The “Series A Conversion Price” means an amount initially equal to $100 but which is subject to adjustment for stock splits, combinations, certain dividends and distributions and with respect to mergers, reorganizations and similar transactions as set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation. Each share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock represents the same economic interest in Greektown Superholdings as each share of Series A-2 Preferred Stock and such shares differ only with respect to voting rights as set forth below in this Item 11. Our Certificate of Incorporation provides further information regarding our Preferred Stock and qualifies the summary under Item 11 of this registration statement in its entirety.

Summary of Stock Terms

Issuance of Additional Stock. The Board will not have the right to (i) authorize additional shares of Common Stock without the vote of the holders of shares of capital stock of Greektown Superholdings representing a majority of the votes represented by all outstanding shares of capital stock (on an as-converted basis) of Greektown Superholdings entitled to vote, voting together as a single class, (ii) authorize or issue additional shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock if such authorization or issuance would adversely affect (A) the Series A-1 Preferred Stock in a manner different than it would affect the Series A-2 Preferred Stock without the separate consent of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock and (B) the Series A-2 Preferred Stock in a manner different than it would affect the Series A-1 Preferred Stock without the separate consent of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock or (iii) cause Greektown Superholdings to issue or sell to any person (including holders of shares of capital stock and affiliates of holders of shares of capital stock) more than five percent (5%) of any Common Stock, Preferred Stock or other voting securities, voting interests or equity interests of Greektown Superholdings except in accordance with the provisions of the Michigan Gaming Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. Greektown Superholdings may not issue any class of non-voting equity securities unless and solely to the extent permitted by section 1123(a)(6) of the title 11 of the

60

Bankruptcy Code; provided, however that such restriction (A) will have no further force and effect beyond that required under section 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code; (B) will have such force and effect, if any, only for so long as section 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code is in effect and applicable to Greektown Superholdings; and (C) in all events may be amended or eliminated in accordance with applicable law from time to time in effect.

Transfer Restrictions. No stockholder may transfer its shares of Common Stock, Preferred Stock or other voting securities, voting interests or equity interests of Greektown Superholdings unless such transfer is in accordance with the Michigan Gaming Act and the rules promulgated thereunder.

Voting Rights. The holders of Series A-1 Common Stock are entitled to ten (10) votes for each outstanding share of Series A-1 Common Stock. The holders of Series A-2 Common Stock are entitled to one (1) vote for each outstanding share of Series A-2 Common Stock; provided, however, that, except as otherwise required by law, holders of Common Stock are not be entitled to vote on any amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either separately or together with the holders of one or more other such series, to vote thereon pursuant to the Certificate of Incorporation or pursuant to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. Except as provided below, the holders of Series A-1 Preferred Stock are entitled a number of votes equal to ten (10) times the number of shares of Series A-1 Common Stock into which such share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock is then convertible. Except as provided below, the holders of Series A-2 Preferred Stock are entitled to a number of votes equal to one (1) times the number of shares of Series A-2 Common Stock into which such share of Series A-2 Preferred Stock is then convertible. Except as provided by law and as set forth below, holders of Series A-1 Preferred Stock and holders of Series A-2 Preferred Stock will vote together with the holders of Common Stock as a single class. The approval of a majority of the votes of Series A-1 Preferred Stock will be required in order to amend, alter or repeal any provision of the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of Greektown Superholdings if such amendment, alteration or repeal would adversely affect the Series A-1 Preferred Stock in a manner different than it would affect the Series A-2 Preferred Stock. The approval of a majority of the votes of Series A-2 Preferred Stock will be required in order to amend, alter or repeal any provision of the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of Greektown Superholdings if such amendment, alteration or repeal would adversely affect the Series A-2 Preferred Stock in a manner different than it would affect the Series A-2 Preferred Stock. Any of the rights, powers, preferences and other terms of the Series A Preferred Stock set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation may be waived on behalf of all holders of Series A Preferred Stock by the affirmative written consent or vote of the holders of sixty six and two thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding (with each holder of Series A-1 Preferred Stock and each holder of Series A-2 Preferred Stock entitled to cast one vote with respect to each share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock or Series A-2 Preferred Stock held by such holder) voting together as a single class.

Dividends. Beginning on the date on which Greektown Superholdings first issues Series A Preferred Stock, each share of Series A Preferred Stock (including unissued shares) will accrue dividends on a daily basis at the rate equal to 7.5% per annum of the Series A Reference Price (whether or not declared), subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Series A Preferred Stock. Such dividends will be cumulative; provided, however, that such dividends should be payable only when, as, and if declared by the Board and for so long as Greektown Superholdings is subject to the jurisdiction of the MGCB, Greektown Superholdings may not pay any dividends unless such dividends are approved by, and issued in compliance with the regulations and restrictions imposed by, the MGCB. Greektown Superholdings may not declare, pay or set aside any dividends on shares of any other class or series of capital stock of Greektown Superholdings (other than dividends on shares of Common Stock payable in shares of Common Stock) unless the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding will first receive, or simultaneously receive, a dividend equal to (i) the amount of accrued but unpaid dividends with respect to each share of Series A Preferred Stock plus (ii) either (A) in the case of a dividend on Common Stock or any class or series of capital stock convertible into Common Stock, the amount that would have been payable with respect to

61

each share of Series A Preferred Stock if such share had been converted to Common Stock on the record date for payment of such dividend or (B) in the case of a dividend on any class or series of capital stock that is not convertible into Common Stock, an amount determined by (x) dividing the amount of the dividend payable on each share of such class or series of capital stock by the original issuance price of each share of such class or series of capital stock and (y) multiplying such fraction by the Series A Reference Price; provided that, if Greektown Superholdings declares, pays or sets aside, on the same date, a dividend on more than one class or series of capital stock, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock will receive an amount calculated based on the dividend on the class or series of capital stock that would result in the highest Series A Preferred Stock dividend.

Distributions. All distributions to the stockholders of Greektown Superholdings upon a voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Greektown Superholdings, if any, will be made in accordance with the order and priority set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation.

Taxes. Greektown Superholdings will pay any and all stamp, transfer, recording, issue and other similar taxes that may be payable in respect of any issuance or delivery of shares of Common Stock upon conversion of shares of Series A Preferred Stock. Greektown Superholdings will not, however, be required to pay any tax which may be payable in respect of any transfer involved in the issuance and delivery of shares of Common Stock in a name other than that in which the shares of Series A Preferred Stock so converted were registered, and no such issuance or delivery will be made unless and until the person or entity requesting such issuance has paid to Greektown Superholdings the amount of any such tax or has established, to the satisfaction of Greektown Superholdings, that such tax has been paid.

Warrants to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock

Greektown Superholdings will issue warrants to purchase the Series A-1 Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase the Series A-2 Preferred Stock, in each case, at an initial purchase price per share equal to $0.01 (the “Warrant Shares”) which price will be adjusted as set forth in the Warrant (as defined below). Greektown Superholdings will enter into such warrants with any Put Party and/or holder of Senior Notes who elects to purchase Preferred Stock representing more than 4.9% of the capital stock of Greektown Superholdings as of the Effective Date, or if such party that qualifies as an “Institutional Investor” under Michigan gaming law elects to purchase more than 14.9% of the capital stock of Greektown Superholdings as of the Effective Date. The Warrant to Purchase Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Greektown Superholdings (the “Warrant”), a form of which is attached to this registration statement and which will be used for both warrants to purchase the Series A-1 Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase the Series A-2 Preferred Stock, which will be effective as of the Effective Date, provides further information regarding our warrants and qualifies the summary under Item 11 of this registration statement in its entirety.

Voting Rights. The holders of Warrants will have no voting rights prior to exercise of the Warrant.

Dividends. The holder of a Warrant will be entitled to receive any and all dividends and other distributions paid to the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock in accordance with the Certificate of Incorporation. However, such dividends or distributions will be payable only upon exercise of the Warrant. In accordance with the Certificate of Incorporation, from the date on which Greektown Superholdings first issues Series A Preferred Stock, each Warrant Share (including unissued Warrant Shares) will accrue dividends on a daily basis at the rate equal to 7.5% per annum of the Series A Reference Price (whether or not declared), subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Series A Preferred Stock.

Early Termination. In the event of any capital reorganization, or any reclassification of the capital stock of Greektown Superholdings (other than a change in par value or from par value to no par value or no par value to par value or as a result of a stock dividend or subdivision, split-up or combination of shares), or the consolidation or merger of Greektown Superholdings with or into another corporation (other than a merger solely to effect a reincorporation of Greektown Superholdings into another state), or the sale, lease, transfer, exclusive license or other disposition in a single transaction or series of related transactions of all or substantially all of its assets to any

62

other person and such transaction results in a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Greektown Superholdings pursuant to Section B.3 of Article 4 of Greektown Superholdings’ Certificate of Incorporation, at any time prior to the earlier of the expiration of a Warrant or the exercise in full of a Warrant, each holder of a Warrant will be entitled to receive, subject to the consummation of such event, the cash, securities and other property that such holder would have received in respect of the Warrant Shares had such holder exercised its Warrant immediately prior to the effective time of such event less an amount equal to (i) the number of Warrant Shares then subject to the applicable Warrant multiplied by (ii) the purchase price per share of such Warrant in effect at the time of such event.

Limitations on Exercise. The exercise of each Warrant and the issuance of the Warrant Shares by Greektown Superholdings upon such exercise are subject to Article Twelfth of the Certificate of Incorporation which prohibits the issuance of shares of capital stock of Greektown Superholdings in certain circumstances.

ITEM 12. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Greektown Superholdings is a company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws include provisions that generally eliminate personal liability of our directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duty. These provisions do not eliminate liability for: (i) acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law or (ii) in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which a director or officer has been finally adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be liable to Greektown Superholdings, unless, and only to the extent that, the Court of Chancery of Delaware or another court in which the proceeding for which the director or officer is seeking indemnification determines that, despite adjudication of liability, but in view of all of the circumstances of the case, such director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification for expenses deemed proper by such court.

Our Bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Our Bylaws permit us to indemnify our employees to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware General Corporation Law, when authorized from time to time by the board of directors. We are authorized to carry directors’ and officers’ insurance protecting us, any director, officer or employee, against any expense, liability or loss, whether or not we would have the power to indemnify such person.

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of fiduciary duty. These provisions also may reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. In addition, we may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

The Bylaws also provide that indemnification provided for in the Bylaws will not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which the indemnified party may be entitled and that any repeal or modification of the Bylaws’ indemnification provisions will be prospective only and will not adversely affect the rights of any director or officer in effect at the time of any act or omission occurring prior to such repeal or modification.

Greektown Superholdings, George Boyer and certain of the Put Parties have entered into the Boyer Indemnification Agreement pursuant to which Mr. Boyer will be indemnified for claims brought against him in his capacity as sole director of Greektown Superholdings until the Effective Date. In addition, pursuant to the Vallier Indemnification Agreement, Mr. Vallier will be indemnified for claims brought against him in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Greektown Superholdings until the Effective Date.

In addition to the above, Greektown Superholdings may enter into one or more agreements with any person to provide for indemnification greater or different than that which is provided for in Greektown Superholdings’ Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws.

63

There is no pending litigation or proceeding involving a director, officer or employee of Greektown Superholdings as to which indemnification is being sought, nor are we aware of any pending or threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any director, officer or employee.

ITEM 13. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements required to be included in this registration statement appear immediately following the signature page to this registration statement beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 14. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Prior Independent Registered Accounting Firm

KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) was previously the principal accountant for Greektown Holdings. On July 13, 2007, KPMG declined to stand for reappointment as the auditor of Greektown Holdings for the 2008 fiscal year. The decision to change auditing firms was not recommended by Greektown Holdings’ audit committee. On January 22, 2008, KPMG and Greektown Holdings agreed that KPMG would not provide an audit of Greektown Holdings for the year ended December 31, 2007.

During the year ended December 31, 2006 and the subsequent period through January 22, the termination date of KPMG’s engagement, there were no (1) disagreements with KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to KPMG’s satisfaction, would have caused KPMG to make reference thereto in its report on the consolidated financial statements of Greektown Holdings or (2) reportable events.

KPMG’s report on the consolidated financial statements of Greektown Holdings during the year ended December 31, 2006 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle.

We have furnished KPMG with a copy of the foregoing disclosure and requested that KPMG furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC, stating whether KPMG agrees with the statements made herein and, if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree. A copy of the letter is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this registration statement.

Engagement of Ernst & Young LLP

Greektown Holdings engaged Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) as its independent registered public accounting firm on February 21, 2008.

During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, and through February 21, 2008, Greektown Holdings did not consult with E&Y regarding any of the following:

• the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to Greektown Holdings that E&Y concluded was an important factor considered by Greektown Holdings in reaching a decision as to an accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or

• any matter that was the subject of a disagreement as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K or a reportable event as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

E&Y’s reports on Greektown Holdings’ consolidated financial statements for each of the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle, except that E&Y’s report on Greektown Holdings’ consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 contained a qualification stating that such financials were prepared assuming that Greektown Holdings would continue as a going concern but certain factors exist that raise substantial doubt about its ability to do so.

ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

(a) Financial Statements

64

	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
	Consolidated Statements of Members’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(b)	Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of December 31, 2009
	Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2009
	Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(c)	A list of exhibits filed with this registration statement is included in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.

65

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.

/s/ Cliff J. Vallier
     

By: Cliff J. Vallier
Title: President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Date: March 31, 2010

66

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibit
2.1	Second Amended Joint Plans of Reorganization filed with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on December 7, 2009. (Schedules omitted. The Registrant hereby agrees to provide the omitted schedules to the Plan supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.)
3.1	Certificate of Incorporation of Greektown Superholdings, Inc.
3.2	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Greektown Superholdings, Inc.
3.3	Bylaws of Greektown Superholdings, Inc.
4.1	Senior Secured Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement, dated December 29, 2009.
4.2	Form of Series A Preferred Stock Warrant.
10.1	Revised Development Agreement, dated August 5, 2002, by and among the City of Detroit, The Economic Development Corporation of the City of Detroit and Greektown Casino, L.L.C.
10.2	Lease between Adam J. Maida Roman Catholic Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Detroit and Greektown Casino, LLC dated August 28, 2006.
10.3	Amended Settlement Agreement dated February 22, 2010 among the City of Detroit, Greektown Casino, L.L.C., Greektown Holdings, L.L.C. and the other affiliated debtors and debtors in possession.
10.4	Collective Bargaining Agreement effective June 13, 2008, by and between Greektown Casino, LLC., dba Greektown Casino, and the International Union, Security, Police, Fire Professionals Of America (IUSPFPA), and its Amalgamated Local #1227.
10.5	Collective Bargaining Agreement dated October 17, 2007, between Greektown Casino, LLC, and The Detroit Casino Council.
10.6	Consulting Agreement dated February 12, 2010, by and between Greektown Casino, L.L.C., and WG-Michigan LLC.
10.7	Indemnification Agreement dated March 31, 2010, by and among Greektown Superholdings, Inc., George Boyer and certain other parties thereto.
10.8	Indemnification Agreement dated March 31, 2010, by and among Greektown Superholdings, Inc., Cliff J. Vallier and certain other parties thereto.
16.1	KPMG Letter dated March 31, 2010.
21.1	List of Subsidiaries of Greektown Superholdings, Inc.

67

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008
and the Three Years Ended December 31, 2009

CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Members’ Deficit	F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-8

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Members of
Greektown Holdings, L.L.C.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Greektown Holdings, L.L.C. (Debtor-in-Possession and the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, members’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Greektown Holdings, L.L.C. at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the appropriateness of using the going-concern basis for the Company’s financial statements is dependent upon, among other things: the Company’s ability to comply with the terms and conditions of the debtor-in-possession financing agreement; to improve profitability; to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy liabilities as they come due; and to obtain additional financing to meet the Company’s future obligations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 31, 2010

F-2

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31
	2009			2008
	(In Thousands)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	25,692		$	24,032
Certificate of deposit			530			522
Accounts receivable—gaming, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $236 and $2,417 in 2009 and 2008, respectively			3,603			3,619
Accounts receivable—other, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $40 and $166 in 2009 and 2008, respectively			1,069			701
Notes receivable			2,460			2,370
Inventories			433			601
State of Michigan gaming tax refundable			12,328			—
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			19,498			18,895
Total current assets			65,613			50,740
Property, building, and equipment, net			472,271			448,585
Other assets:
Financing fees, net of accumulated amortization of $27,981 and $15,058 in 2009 and 2008, respectively			9,712			14,105
Deposits and other assets			30			30
Total assets		$	547,626		$	513,460

F-3

	December 31
	2009				2008
	(In Thousands)
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities, not subject to compromise:
Debtor-in-possession financing		$	190,037			$	130,134
Secured debt in default			342,054				319,332
Accounts payable			12,846				25,299
Accrued City of Detroit settlement			13,547				—
Accrued interest			1,650				649
Notes payable			1,890				6,671
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			20,947				20,323
Total current liabilities not subject to compromise			582,971				502,408
Long-term liabilities not subject to compromise:
Obligation under capital lease			786				786
Deferred Michigan business tax, net			2,370				2,675
Total long-term liabilities not subject to compromise			3,156				3,461
Liabilities subject to compromise:
Long-term debt and notes payable			185,000				185,000
Pre-petition payables			12,334				12,370
Pre-petition accrued interest			9,944				9,944
Accrued interest subject to compromise			31,489				11,601
Pre-petition amounts due to parent			1,350				1,350
Lawsuit settlement obligation			12,303				12,303
Total liabilities subject to compromise			252,420				232,568
Total liabilities			838,547				738,437
Contributed capital			47,588				47,588
Accumulated deficit			(338,509	)			(272,565	)
Total members’ deficit			(290,921	)			(224,977	)
Total liabilities and members’ deficit		$	547,626			$	513,460

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-4

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Year Ended December 31
	2009				2008				2007
	(In Thousands)
Revenues
Casino		$	332,878			$	297,329			$	321,779
Food and beverage			22,524				11,862				13,959
Hotel			7,880				—				—
Other			4,958				4,608				4,891
Total revenues			368,240				313,799				340,629
Less promotional allowances			36,635				27,070				25,982
Net revenues			331,605				286,729				314,647
Operating expenses
Casino			75,484				77,953				83,449
Gaming taxes			75,635				83,116				89,596
Food and beverage			16,427				9,713				11,105
Hotel			6,590				—				—
Marketing, advertising and entertainment			8,586				5,549				7,389
Facilities			18,189				17,932				17,879
Depreciation and amortization			18,574				7,590				8,629
Bad debts			—				1,202				—
General and administrative expenses			41,554				39,674				43,269
Lease restoration expense			—				—				2,250
Michigan Single Business Tax			—				—				1,275
Other			488				651				371
Pre-opening expenses			1,043				828				—
City of Detroit settlement			16,629				—				—
Impairment of casino development rights			—				128,240				—
Operating expenses			279,199				372,448				265,212
Earnings (loss) before reorganization items			52,406				(85,719	)			49,435
Chapter 11 related reorganization items			(28,711	)			(11,667	)			—
Other income (expense)
Interest expense			(69,998	)			(38,629	)			(37,052	)
Amortization of finance fees and accretion of discount on senior notes			(12,923	)			(10,252	)			(3,680	)
Interest income			171				235				735
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps			—				(2,650	)			(7,385	)
Consulting company success fee			(6,240	)			—				—
Miscellaneous income (expense)			163				2				(63	)
Total other expenses			(88,827	)			(51,294	)			(47,445	)
(Loss) income before provisions for state income taxes			(65,132	)			(148,680	)			1,990
Michigan business tax (expense)—current			(1,117	)			(1,553	)			—
Michigan business tax benefit (expense)—deferred			305				(2,675	)			—
Net (loss) income		$	(65,944	)		$	(152,908	)		$	1,990

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-5

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ DEFICIT

	Contributed Capital			Accumulated Deficit				Total Members’ Deficit
	(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2006		$	489		$	(121,647	)		$	(121,158	)
Member contribution			35,000			—				35,000
Net income			—			1,990				1,990
Balance at December 31, 2007			35,489			(119,657	)			(84,168	)
Member contribution			12,099			—				12,099
Net loss			—			(152,908	)			(152,908	)
Balance at December 31, 2008			47,588			(272,565	)			(224,977	)
Net loss			—			(65,944	)			(65,944	)
Balance at December 31, 2009		$	47,588		$	(338,509	)		$	(290,921	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-6

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Year Ended December 31
	2009				2008				2007
	(In Thousands)
Operating activities
Net (loss) income		$	(65,944	)		$	(152,908	)		$	1,990
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			18,574				7,590				8,629
Amortization of financing fees and accretion of discount on senior notes			12,923				10,252				3,680
Impairment of casino development rights			—				128,240				—
Accrued PIK interest			29,259				5,366				—
Deferred Michigan business tax			(305	)			2,675				—
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps			—				2,650				7,385
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable—gaming			16				2,159				(1,860	)
Accounts receivable—other			(368	)			(35	)			(266	)
State of Michigan gaming tax refundable			(12,328	)			—				—
Inventories			168				(275	)			(37	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			(603	)			(1,496	)			196
Notes receivables			(90	)			(120	)			—
Account payable:
Pre-petition payables			(36	)			12,370				3,373
Pre-petition amounts due to parent			—				1,350				—
Post-petition payables			20,731				3,709				—
City of Detroit settlement			13,547				—				—
Accrued expenses, interest, and other liabilities			21,513				14,696				4,274
Net cash provided by operating activities before reorganization items			37,057				36,223				27,364
Operating cash flows for reorganization items			(33,184	)			(6,607	)			—
Net cash provided by operating activities			3,873				29,616				27,364
Investing activities
Capital expenditures			(42,260	)			(169,285	)			(105,091	)
Payment for casino development rights			—				—				(1,056	)
Investment in certificate of deposit			(8	)			(18	)			(504	)
Net cash used in investing activities			(42,268	)			(169,303	)			(106,651	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from borrowings under DIP Financing and Amended DIP Financing			240,715				181,907				—
Proceeds from borrowings on long-term debt and notes payable			—				—				42,572
Payment on long-term debt and note payable			(187,349	)			(52,252	)			(2,013	)
Notes payable			(4,781	)			6,671				—
Lawsuit settlement obligation payments			—				(247	)			(233	)
Financing fees paid			(8,530	)			(3,710	)			(2,490	)
Proceeds from member contribution			—				12,099				35,000
Net cash provided by financing activities			40,055				144,468				72,836
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			1,660				4,781				(6,451	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year			24,032				19,251				25,702
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year		$	25,692			$	24,032			$	19,251
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for interest		$	16,587			$	29,851			$	45,135
Supplemental noncash activity
Conversion of accounts receivable—Gaming to notes receivable		$	—			$	—			$	2,250

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-7

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the Three Years Ended December 31, 2009

1. Description of Business

Greektown Holdings, L.L.C. (the “Company”) was formed in September 2005 as a limited liability company owned by Kewadin Greektown Casino, L.L.C. (“Kewadin”) and Monroe Partners, L.L.C. (“Monroe”) (see Note 8). The Company owns Greektown Casino, L.L.C. (Greektown Casino), which is engaged in the operation of a casino gaming facility in the City of Detroit (the “City”), which opened November 10, 2000 under a license granted by the Michigan Gaming Control Board (“MGCB”), and the development of an expanded hotel/casino complex under the terms of a development agreement between Greektown Casino and the City (the “Development Agreement”).

On August 2, 2002, the City approved revised development agreements for all three Detroit casino developers. Under the terms of its revised Development Agreement, Greektown Casino completed its development of a permanent hotel/casino complex containing hotel, parking, expanded gaming, and other amenities at its current site (the “Expanded Complex”).

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Presentation and Basis of Accounting

The accompanying consolidated financial statements present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Greektown Holdings, L.L.C. and its wholly owned subsidiaries—Greektown Holdings II, Inc., and Greektown Casino, L.L.C. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Trappers GC Partner, LLC and three nonoperating real estate subsidiaries.

On May 29, 2008 (the “Petition Date”), the Company filed a voluntary petition for reorganization (the “Restructuring Proceedings”) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (see Note 3). The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Reorganizationstopic of the ASC (as subsequently defined) and on a going-concern basis, which contemplates continuity of operations and realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. However, as a result of the Restructuring Proceedings, such realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities is uncertain. While operating as debtors-in-possession (“DIP”) under the protection of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court, the Company may sell or otherwise dispose of assets and liquidate or settle liabilities for amounts other than those reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

TheReorganizationstopic of the ASC generally does not change the manner in which financial statements are prepared. However, it does require that the financial statements for periods subsequent to the filing of the Chapter 11 petition distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Revenues, expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses that can be directly associated with the reorganization and restructuring of the business must be reported separately as reorganization items in the statement of operations beginning in the period ended June 30, 2008. The balance sheet must distinguish pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise from both those pre-petition liabilities that are not subject to compromise and from post-petition liabilities. Liabilities that may be affected by a plan of reorganization must be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. In addition, reorganization items must be disclosed separately in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted the GAAP applicable to entities operating in Chapter 11 effective on May 29, 2008, and has segregated those items as outlined above for all reporting periods subsequent to such date.

The appropriateness of using the going-concern basis for the Debtors’ financial statements is dependent upon, among other things: the Debtors’ ability (i) to comply with the terms and

F-8

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

conditions of the DIP facility; (ii) to improve profitability; (iii) to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy liabilities as they come due; and (iv) to obtain additional financing to meet the Company’s future obligations

As further described in Note 6, the Company has long-term obligations. These obligations have been classified as a current liability as a result of the filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection under the United States Bankruptcy Code.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period.

Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of property, building, and equipment, valuation allowances for receivables, tax obligations and certain other accrued liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenues

Greektown Holdings recognizes as Casino revenues the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. Revenues from food and beverage and hotel operations are recognized at the time of sale or upon the provision of service.

Promotional Allowances

The retail value of food, beverage, and other complimentary items furnished to customers without charge is included in revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances. The costs of providing such promotional allowances for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, were as follows (in thousands):

	December 31
	2009			2008			2007
Food and beverage		$	9,751		$	4,118		$	4,883
Hotel			2,265			—			—
		$	12,016		$	4,118		$	4,883

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Certificates of Deposit

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Certificates of deposit represent cash deposits with maturities in excess of three months.

Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable—gaming consists primarily of gaming markers issued to casino patrons on the gaming floor. A marker is a voucher for a specified amount of dollars negotiable solely within Greektown Casino. Markers are recorded at issued value and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is Greektown Casino’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in Greektown Casino’s existing accounts receivable.

Notes receivable represents a balance owed from a patron, which is evidenced by an unsecured promissory note with a principal balance of $2,000,000. The note matured on March 31, 2009 and

F-9

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum, of which $460,000, $370,000, and $250,000 was earned through December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The Company served a collection notice related to this note and expects full payment.

Greektown Casino determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience and review of returned gaming markers, past-due balances, and individual collection analysis. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all reasonable means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and equivalents, certificates of deposit and accounts receivable. We control our exposure to credit risk associated with these instruments by (i) maintaining strict controls and security procedures to safeguard cash balances on our gaming floors and in controlled areas in our facility; and (ii) maintaining strict policies over credit extension that include credit evaluations, credit limits and monitoring procedures.

Advertising Expense

The Company expenses costs associated with advertising and promotion as incurred. Advertising and promotion expense was approximately $8,310,000, $4,620,000, and $5,541,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid expenses consist of payments made for items to be expensed over future periods. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, prepaid expenses included approximately $12,211,000 and $12,333,000, respectively, related to the annual gaming license and municipal service fees that will be expensed in subsequent periods.

Inventories

Inventories, consisting of food, beverage, and gift shop items, are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method.

Property, Building, and Equipment

Property, building, and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred and approximated $725,000, $584,000, and $888,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense includes amortization of assets recorded under capital leases.

Reserve for Club Greektown

Greektown Casino sponsors a players club (“Club Greektown”) for its repeat customers. Members of the club earn points for playing Greektown Casino’s electronic video and table games. Club Greektown members may redeem points for cash. Club Greektown members may also earn special coupons or awards as determined by Greektown Casino.

Greektown Casino expenses the cash value of points earned by club members and recognizes a related liability for any unredeemed points. Greektown Casino has adopted the provisions of the

F-10

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Revenue Recognitiontopic of the ASC applicable to instances where consideration is given by a vendor to a customer. Accordingly, Greektown Casino has recognized the cash value of points earned as a direct reduction in casino revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, this reduction totaled $6,727,000, $6,459,000, and $7,151,000, respectively, and is deducted from casino revenue in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

Concentrations of Risk

As of December 31, 2009, approximately 1,700 of the Company’s employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements, including a majority of the Company’s hourly staff.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair value of long-term debt, lawsuit settlement obligation, and long-term payables approximates their carrying value, as determined by the Company, using available market information.

Financing Fees

The Company has incurred certain financing costs in order to secure financing for its Casino and the Expanded Complex. These costs were capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the respective financing agreements.

Capitalized financing fees, net of amortization, totaled $9,712,000 and $14,105,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amortization of these fees was $12,923,000, $8,464,000, and $3,378,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Income and Other Taxes

A provision for federal income taxes is not recorded because, as a limited liability company, taxable income or loss is allocated to the members based on their respective ownership percentages in accordance with the Member Agreement (as defined elsewhere herein). On July 12, 2007, the Michigan legislature enacted the Michigan Business Tax (MBT) which is considered an income tax under the provisions of the Income Taxes topic of the ASC. The MBT has a gross receipts tax and an income tax component. Due to these changes, the enactment has resulted in the recording of both a deferred tax asset and a deferred tax liability related to the gross receipts component. The deferred tax asset was approximately $1.2 million and $1.2 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and the deferred tax liability was $3.6 million and $3.9 million, respectively. These amounts are presented net as a long term deferred tax liability of approximately $2.4 million and $2.7 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The deferred tax asset is the result of future deductions allowed under the enactment provisions of the new law for the 2015 to 2029 tax years, whereas the deferred tax liability is the result of the enactment of the law and the liability resulting from the temporary differences related to capital acquisitions reversing in future periods related to the gross receipts calculation. In addition, the Company has a deferred tax asset of approximately $8 million and approximately $8.2 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to the tax effect of timing differences between book and tax expense related to the income tax component. Based on historical losses in Michigan and the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to utilize them, a full valuation allowance has been provided against these deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded a current provision for MBT of $1,117,000 and $1,553,000, respectively, and a deferred benefit of $305,000 and a deferred provision of $2,675,000, respectively.

F-11

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets

The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with theProperty, Plant and Equipmenttopic of the ASC, which requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.

If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell.

Intangible Assets

The Revised Development Agreement gives rise to an identifiable intangible asset that has been determined to have an indefinite life.

The Company complies with the provisions of theIntangible Assets-Goodwill and Othertopic of the ASC, which provides guidance on how identifiable intangible assets should be accounted for upon acquisition and subsequent to their initial financial statement recognition. This topic requires that identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives be capitalized and tested for impairment at least annually by comparing the fair values of those assets with their recorded amounts.

Accordingly, the Company performs its impairment test as of October 1 of each year by comparing their estimated fair value to the related carrying value as of that date.

Interest Costs

The interest costs associated with debt incurred in connection with the construction of long-lived assets are capitalized until the project is complete, at which time the interest is amortized over the life of the related capitalized assets. The Company uses either the interest rate on the borrowing specific to the capital expenditure or a weighted-average interest rate on outstanding indebtedness. Interest costs capitalized were $2,086,000, $6,987,000, and $7,199,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, in connection with the Expanded Complex.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Effective July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued theFASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles(the “ASC”), and the ASC became the single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP. The historical GAAP hierarchy was eliminated and the ASC became the only level of authoritative GAAP, other than guidance issued by the SEC. All other literature became non-authoritative. The ASC is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. As the ASC was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it will not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued a new standard which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP, and expands the disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. The standard does not introduce new requirements mandating the use of fair value.

The new standard defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement

F-12

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

date.” The definition is based on an exit price rather than an entry price, regardless of whether the entity plans to hold or sell the asset.

The topic also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements in order to facilitate comparisons between entities choosing different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This standard does not affect existing accounting requirements for certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value.

The Company adopted this standard as it relates to financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008, and as it relates to non-financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued a new pronouncement which seeks to enhance disclosure about how and why a company uses derivative and hedging activities, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for (and the interpretations of that topic) and how derivatives and hedging activities affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued a new standard regarding subsequent events which introduces the concept of financial statements being available to be issued. This standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after June 15, 2009. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of theSubsequent Eventstopic of the ASC, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The adoption of the topic did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

3. Petition for Relief Under Chapter 11

On May 29, 2008 (the “Petition Date”), the Company filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Michigan (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The Company sought protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code to allow the Company time to secure adequate funding to complete the Expanded Complex and to protect itself from a forced sale of Greektown Casino by the Michigan Gaming Control Board as provided in the Revised Development Agreement. The Restructuring Proceedings were initiated in response to the Company not meeting the loan covenants put in place by both the lenders and the Michigan Gaming Control Board. Curing these covenants would have required the equity owners of the Company to contribute capital far in excess of their financial strength. As a result, the Company sought protection under Chapter 11 to stay the potential forced sale, and allow it to obtain the financing required to preserve its going concern value for the benefit of all parties involved.

On June 9, 2008, Holdings and the Company entered into a $150 million DIP financing facility in order to finance the remainder of the Expanded Complex and provide funding for working capital and reorganization expenses. The DIP financing facility was amended and restated on February 20, 2009 to provide up to an additional $46 million in two delayed draw term loans and effectuate certain other modifications (see Note 6).

On August 26, 2009, the Debtors, together with their existing pre and post-petition lenders (the Debtor Plan Proponents), filed the Second Amended Joint Plans of Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Debtor Plan”) and the Second Amended Disclosure Statement for Joint Plans of Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Disclosure Statement”). On September 3, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Disclosure Statement. On November 2, 2009, certain of the holders of the Senior

F-13

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Notes due 2013 issued by Holdings and Holdings II, together with certain of the pre-petition secured lenders (the “Noteholder Plan Proponents”) filed a alternative plan of reorganization with the Bankruptcy Court (the “Noteholder Plan”). The Noteholder Plan was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court on January 22, 2010, and, pursuant to the terms of the Noteholder Plan, must become effective, upon the occurrence of the conditions precedent to such effectiveness, on or before June 30, 2010. Conditions precedent to the occurrence of the effective date of the Noteholder Plan include receipt from the MGCB and the City of Detroit of all required regulatory approvals and consents. Upon the effective date of the Noteholder Plan, among other things, the DIP Lenders and the Pre-Petition Secured Lenders shall be paid, and certain of the Noteholder Plan Proponents shall own the equity of the Reorganized Greektown. Pursuant to a stipulation entered into among the Noteholder Plan Proponents and the Debtor Plan Proponents, the Debtor Plan is currently being held in abeyance pending the occurrence of the effective date of the Noteholder Plan.

On December 29, 2009, the Company entered into a new $210 million DIP facility, which refinanced the amended and restated DIP facility dated February 20, 2009 and provided funding for working capital and the costs associated with the Company’s reorganization (see Note 6).

Under Chapter 11, certain claims against the Company in existence prior to the filing of the petitions for relief under the federal bankruptcy laws are stayed while the Company continues business operations as DIP. These claims are reflected in the consolidated balance sheet as “pre-petition payables” and “pre-petition amounts due to related parties.” These amounts represent the Company’s estimate of known or potential prepetition claims and related post-petition interest to be resolved in connection with the Restructuring Proceedings. Such claims remain subject to future adjustments. Future adjustments may result from (i) negotiations; (ii) actions of the Bankruptcy Court, or the actions of the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors pursuant to the Noteholder Plan, assuming the Noteholder Plan becomes effective; (iii) further developments with respect to disputed claims; (iv) rejection of executory contracts; (v) the determination as to the value of any collateral securing claims; (vi) proofs of claim; or (vii) other events. Payment terms for these claims will be established in connection with the Restructuring Proceedings, including in connection with the Noteholder Plan, if it becomes effective.

Chapter 11 related reorganization expenses in the consolidated statement of operations consist of legal and financial advisory fees resulting from or related to the bankruptcy proceedings.

4. Property, Building, and Equipment

Property, building, and equipment and related depreciable lives as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, were as follows (in thousands):

	December 31						Depreciable Lives
	2009			2008
Land		$	104,391		$	104,391		—
Gaming building and improvements			151,506			136,865		3–35 years
Gaming equipment and furnishings			62,983			59,772		3–5 years
Nongaming buildings and improvements			253,913			70,968		39 years
Nongaming office furniture and equipment			43,914			28,208		5–7 years
Construction in progress			8,560			183,910		—
			625,267			584,114
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization			152,996			135,529
Property, building, and equipment, net		$	472,271		$	448,585

F-14

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Certain costs incurred relate to the development and construction of the Expanded Complex, in accordance with the terms of the Revised Development Agreement. These costs are capitalized, and depreciation commenced in February 2009, when the Expanded Complex opened.

5. Casino Development Rights and Impairment

In accordance with the Revised Development Agreement, Greektown Casino is authorized to own and operate on a permanent basis, within certain boundaries in the City, a casino complex containing specified amenities. Under the terms of the Revised Development Agreement:

(a)	Greektown Casino agreed to pay the City $44 million in installment payments (the “Installment Payments”), and contributed certain investment assets.
(b)	Greektown Casino was required to maintain standby letters of credit, totaling $49,360,000, to secure principal and interest payments on certain bonds issued by the Economic Development Corporation of the City (the “EDC”); however, these letters of credit were called by the EDC in June 2008 as a result of the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy filing (see Note 13).
(c)	Greektown Casino signed an indemnity agreement with the City and the EDC with respect to certain matters. Payments made under this indemnity agreement plus liabilities accrued, resulted in capitalizing costs of $32,047,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This amount includes the costs to settle a lawsuit as more fully described in Note 13.
(d)	Greektown Casino contributed to the City its one-third interest, with a cost basis of $2,833,000, in Jefferson Casino, LLC.

The Installment Payments, EDC payments, payments under the indemnity agreement and lawsuit settlement, and the contribution of the ownership interest in Jefferson Holdings, LLC gave rise to an identifiable intangible asset, Casino Development Rights, in the amount of $128,240,000, which under the terms of the Development Agreement, have an indefinite life.

The Company’s last license was renewed on December 14, 2007 and the annual renewal period expired on December 14, 2008 and its renewal is currently held in abeyance by the Michigan Gaming Control Board pending the Company’s bankruptcy reorganization.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets must be reviewed for impairment at least annually or more frequently if impairment indicators are present. The Company performs its annual impairment test for Casino Development Rights as of October 1 of each fiscal year. In the fourth quarter of 2008, in connection with the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, management determined it was necessary to revise its assumptions and perform an interim impairment test of the Casino Development Rights intangible asset at December 31, 2008 due to several factors, which included (i) the uncertainty in the gaming market, (ii) continued uncertainty around the Company’s bankruptcy filing, and (iii) the recent and ongoing deterioration in the local and national economies.

Given the uncertainties in the gaming markets, coupled with the Company’s bankruptcy filing, management determined that the Casino Development Rights of the Company were fully impaired. Accordingly, during the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company impaired this asset in its entirety based on a discounted cash flow analysis. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $128,240,000 in the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008.

6. Long-Term Debt, Notes Payable, and Debtor in Possession Financing

The Company entered into a financing agreement on December 2, 2005 that provided for a $190 million term loan and a $100 million revolving credit facility, to finance the payment for Greektown Casino’s existing credit facilities that were expiring. Effective April 2007, the Company’s

F-15

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

existing five-year revolving credit facilities (including letter-of-credit facilities) were increased to $125,000,000, expiring December 2010. The funds received by the Company under these credit facilities were advanced to Greektown Casino under the following terms:

• Seven-year maturity for the original long-term indebtedness and five-year maturity for revolving credit facility.

• Quarterly amortization of $475,000, beginning on December 31, 2006 through December 31, 2011; thereafter, quarterly amortization payments of one-fourth the remaining outstanding amount for each of the four quarters beginning on March 31, 2012. As a result of the bankruptcy filing, these amortization payments have been stayed.

• Interest payments are payable monthly or quarterly, at a rate equal to, at the Company’s option: (i) for a base rate loan, (a) the greater of (I) the rate of interest then most recently established by the administrative agent (Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation) in New York, New York, as its base rate for U.S. dollars loaned in the United States, and (II) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, plus (b) a margin based on the ratio of total net senior debt to Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) (1.50% or 1.75%) or (ii) for a LIBOR loan, LIBOR plus a margin based on the ratio of total net senior debt to EBITDA (2.50% or 2.75%). The margins mentioned above have been increased by 2.00% as a result of the bankruptcy filing.

• Interest rate swap agreement with notional amount of $70 million, as more fully described below.

The funds received and outstanding from the financing agreement are considered secured debt in default. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, outstanding secured debt in default, along with the interest rates associated with such funds, consists of the following:

Amount of Obligation						Interest Rate Structure	Rate of Interest
December 31
2009			2008
(In Thousands)
	$	172,157		$	160,561	BASE RATE + 3.250%		7.00	%
		34,370			32,054	BASE RATE + 3.250%		7.00	%
		135,527			126,717	BASE RATE + 3.000%		6.75	%
	$	342,054		$	319,332

On June 9, 2008, Holdings and the Company entered into a $150 million debtor-in-possession financing facility (the “DIP Financing”) in order to finance the remainder of the Expanded Complex and provide funding for working capital and reorganization expenses. The DIP Financing included a delayed draw term loan agreement for $135 million and a revolving credit facility for $15 million. There were strict guidelines as to how these funds would be used and were required to be approved and monitored by the U.S. Trustee as well as the MGCB.

The funds from the delayed draw term loan facility were only for construction related expenditures, while the funds from the revolving credit facility could be used to pay operational and construction related expenses.

F-16

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

As of December 31, 2008, the Company’s obligations, as they related to the DIP Financing, and the interest rates on these obligations are set forth below:

Amount of Obligation			Interest Rate Structure	Rate of Interest
(In Thousands)
	$	115,134	BASE + 5.25% payable monthly		8.50	%
		15,000	BASE + 5.25% payable monthly		8.50	%
	$	130,134

The DIP Financing was amended and restated on February 20, 2009 (the “Amended DIP Financing”) to provide up to an additional $46 million in two delayed draw term loans. There were strict guidelines as to how these additional funds could be used and had to be approved and monitored by the U.S. Trustee as well as the MGCB. Of the funds received from the two delayed draw term loans, $26 million could only be used for construction related expenses, while up to $20 million of the remaining commitment could be used to pay operational and construction related expenses and was available to the Company in increments upon achieving certain milestones as set forth in the agreement.

In addition to providing additional borrowings, the Amended DIP Financing adjusted the rate of interest on the delayed draw term loan and revolving credit facility as provided by the original DIP Financing from the base rate plus 5.25% per annum to the base rate plus 7.25% per annum. The interest rate applicable to the additional delayed draw term loans was the base rate plus 5.25%. The Amended DIP Financing restated the covenant requirements which the Company must comply with under the terms of the agreement.

The Amended DIP Financing also set forth an additional Paid-in-Kind interest (“PIK”) amount that was accrued and added to the then outstanding DIP Financing. The PIK was 5.00% of the outstanding amount of the original DIP Financing and had the same maturity date as the DIP Financing.

On December 29, 2009 the Company executed the Senior Secured Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession credit agreement (the “New DIP Credit Facility”), which provides maximum aggregate principal of $210 million. The New DIP Credit Facility consists of a $190 million Term A loan and a $20 million delayed draw term loan; the interest rate associated with these borrowings is 14.50% of which 11.00% is cash interest and 3.50% is PIK. Under the terms of the New DIP Credit Facility, the Term A Loan was utilized to fund the repayment in full of the DIP Credit Facility and the Amended DIP Credit Facility, while the delayed draw term loan may be used for operational needs. As of December 31, 2009 the Company was fully extended on the Term A Loan and had $20 million available to it under the delayed draw term loan. The PIK interest accrued at December 31, 2009 totaled $37,000.

The New DIP Credit Facility contains covenants including limitations on additional indebtedness, capital expenditures, mergers or acquisitions, dispositions of assets, loans and advances, and transactions with affiliates. Further, the Agreement requires the Company to maintain specific financial ratios including monthly minimum earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and restructuring costs (EBITDAR), as defined in the New DIP Credit Facility. At December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with the various covenants of the New DIP Credit Facility.

F-17

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

As of December 31, 2009, the Company’s obligations, as they relate to the New DIP Credit Facility and the interest rates on these obligations are set forth below:

Amount of Obligation			Rate of Interest
(In Thousands)
	$	190,037	11.00% fixed rate payable quarterly; 3.50% PIK
	$	190,037

As security for the term loan and any amounts owing under the revolving credit facility, the Company has pledged its 100% equity interest in Greektown Casino.

Further, Greektown Casino also assigned a security interest in all of its assets as collateral for the above agreements, and has guaranteed repayment of these borrowings.

Except as permitted under the terms of the New DIP Credit Facility and other existing credit facilities, the Company will not be permitted to incur any other indebtedness.

Unsecured Notes

The Company also issued $185,000,000 in unsecured notes in December 2005 to finance its operations and meet its liability and equity commitments. The maturity date of the notes is December 1, 2013. As a result of the Chapter 11 filing the notes became unsecured pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise. Upon effectiveness of the Noteholder Plan, it is anticipated that the notes will be cancelled (See Note 3).

Effective January 19, 2006 and September 28, 2007, Holdings entered into interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts of $195 million and $70 million, respectively. The purpose of these interest rate swaps was to manage the cash flows related to well-defined interest rate costs and the risk associated with variable rate debt. These financial instruments were terminated as a result of the Chapter 11 filing. On the date of termination, the liabilities under the swap agreements became fixed at $9,270,000 related to the $195 million interest rate swap agreement and $2,750,000 related to the $70 million interest rate swap agreement and were included in liabilities not subject to compromise. Interest on these obligations is recorded in accrued expenses and other liabilities and monthly interest is accrued at an 8.5% interest rate.

7. Leases

Greektown Casino entered into a non-cancelable operating lease for warehouse space; however, this agreement expired during May 2009, and the new agreement includes a thirty (30) day cancellation clause. Rental expense under these agreements for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, was $80,000, $423,000, and $2,662,000, respectively. Greektown Casino also subleases certain portions of its owned or leased facilities under noncancelable operating leases. Rental income under these leases for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $506,000, $660,000, and $778,000, respectively.

In addition, during 2007 Greektown Casino entered into a settlement agreement with the lessor of a parking garage whereby Greektown Casino agreed to pay $2.25 million related to lease restoration costs; this amount was recorded as an expense during 2007, and the related liability is recorded in pre-petition payables subject to compromise at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

F-18

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

At December 31, 2009, future minimum rental payments required under noncancelable operating leases, with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year and lease and sublease income were as follows:

	Capital Lease Payments			Lease and Sublease Income
Periods ending December 31:
2010		$	336		$	446
2011			336			428
2012			336			319
2013			336			319
2014			336			265
Thereafter			7,364			1,993
			9,044		$	3,770
Less amount representing interest			8,258
Present value of net minimum capital lease payments			786
Less current installments of obligation under a capital lease			—
		$	786

Certain of the leases include escalation clauses relating to the consumer price index, utilities, taxes, and other operating expenses. Greektown Casino will receive additional rental income in future years based on those factors that cannot be estimated currently.

8. Related-Party Transactions

The Company and Greektown Casino have entered into certain business transactions with individuals or entities related to the ownership of direct or indirect member interests. Under the provisions of their internal control system, expenditures to any one related party in excess of $50,000 annually must be approved by the Company’s management board.

For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 payments to related parties, other than financing-related activities and member distributions, totaled approximately $8,926,000, $2,136,000, and $784,000, respectively.

Greektown Casino entered into a management services agreement with the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (the “Tribe”), a related entity to Kewadin, Monroe, and the Company, which required the Greektown Casino to pay a base management fee of $110,000 per month, as well as the reimbursement of travel, lodging, and out-of-pocket expenses incurred and all reasonable salary costs and fringe benefit expenses of key personnel who are providing such contracted services. This agreement was rejected by the Debtors in the restructuring proceedings. As such, these payments were discontinued, however, the pre-petition amount owed to the Tribe as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 is $550,000, which is classified as liabilities subject to compromise.

In November 2007, Kewadin made a $35 million equity contribution to the Company to cure non-compliance with certain financial covenants under the Company’s pre-petition credit facility. Additionally, Kewadin made equity contributions of approximately $600,000, $10 million and $1.5 million to Greektown Holdings for construction fees related to the construction of the Expanded Complex in January 2008, March 2008, and May 2008, respectively.

Greektown Casino periodically enters into certain business transactions with persons related to the direct or indirect ownership of their member interests. Since 2007, Greektown Casino has entered into the following related person transactions:

F-19

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

• Greektown Casino has entered into various transactions with New Millennium Advisors, LLC to purchase uniforms used in the operation of Greektown Casino (e.g., uniforms for dealers, kitchen staff, security, etc.) which totaled approximately $1,000, $83,000 and $129,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. New Millennium Advisors, LLC is owned, in whole or in part, by Marvin Beatty, a former director of Holdings and Greektown Casino and current member of Monroe.

• Customers of Greektown Casino have the ability to earn food complimentaries (comps) for use at Fishbones, an upscale seafood restaurant located near Greektown Casino. Greektown reimburses Fishbones at a discounted rate for the costs to Fishbones for providing food to customers redeeming the comps. Greektown LLC expenses with respect to the Fishbones comps totaled approximately $672,000, $1 million, and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Fishbones is owned in part by Ted Gatzaros, a former director of Greektown LLC and current member of Monroe.

• Customers of Greektown have the ability to earn hotel comps for use at the Atheneum Suite Hotel at a discounted rate for the costs to the hotel for providing lodging to customers redeeming the comps. Greektown LLC expenses with respect to the Atheneum Suite Hotel complimentaries totaled approximately $169,000, $306,000, and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The Atheneum Suite Hotel is owned in part by Ted Gatzaros, a former director of Greektown Casino and current member of Monroe.

Randall A. Fine, who was the Chief Executive Officer until December 31, 2009, is the Managing Director of the Fine Point Group. Greektown Casino and the Fine Point Group entered into the Consulting Agreement (as subsequently defined) as of December 31, 2008 (See Note 11).

Accounts receivable—other includes $298,000 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, for the amounts due from Monroe, a member of the Company.

9. Members’ Deficit

When it was formed in September 2005, Holdings’ interest in Greektown Casino was transferred to Holdings by the two owners. Consistent with their former ownership interests in Greektown Casino, Kewadin and Monroe each own a 50% interest in Holdings. The transactions involving a substitution of Holdings for the members’ interests in Greektown Casino have been considered as transactions between common control entities, and therefore have been accounted for at carrying value.

As part of this ownership transaction, the member agreement among Kewadin, Monroe, and Greektown Holdings became the member agreement among Kewadin, Monroe, and the Company.

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, a member of the Company made equity contributions totaling $0, $12,100,000, and $35,000,000, respectively, to the Company. The 2008 contributions were made in the first and second quarter, and all contributions were made before the Chapter 11 filing.

10. Gaming Taxes and Fees

Under the provisions of the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act (the “Act”), casino licensees are subject to the following gaming taxes and fees on an ongoing basis:

• An annual licensing fee;

• An annual payment, together with the other two casino licensees, of all MGCB regulatory and enforcement costs. Greektown Casino was assessed $10,233,000, $10,003,000, and $9,826,000, for its portion of the annual payment for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively;

F-20

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

• A wagering tax, calculated based on adjusted gross gaming receipts, payable daily, of 24% (the Act also provides for certain increases in the wagering tax if Greektown Casino’s Expanded Complex facilities are not operational from and after July 1, 2009, and a reduction in that tax once they are operational); and,

• A municipal services fee in an amount equal to the greater of 1.25% of adjusted gross gaming receipts or $4 million annually.

These gaming taxes and fees are in addition to the taxes, fees, and assessments customarily paid by business entities conducting business in the State of Michigan and the City and amounted to $75,635,000, $83,116,000, and $89,596,000, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company has also been required to pay a daily fee to the City of 1% of adjusted gross receipts, increasing to 2% of adjusted gross receipts if adjusted gross receipts exceed $400 million in any one calendar year. Additionally, if and when adjusted gross receipts exceed $400 million, the Company will be required to pay $4 million to the City. The Company’s adjusted gross receipts did not exceed $400 million during the calendar years 2009, 2008, or 2007.

The Act, was amended in 2004 to increase the wagering tax rate for the three Detroit casinos from 18% of adjusted gross receipts to 24% of adjusted gross receipts. If the MGCB determines that (1) the licensee has been “fully operational” for 30 consecutive days and (2) the licensee has been in compliance with its Revised Development Agreement for at least 30 consecutive days, then the MGCB is required to certify the licensee and the tax rate will revert to a 1% increase only, resulting in a tax rate for Greektown of 19% of adjusted gross receipts (the “Tax Rollback”).

Greektown was “fully operational” and had complied with the first requirement (fully operational for 30 consecutive days) on March 17, 2009. “Fully operational” is defined in the Gaming Act as follows: “a certificate of occupancy has been issued to the casino licensee for the operation of a hotel with not fewer than 400 guest rooms and, after issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the casino licensee’s casino, casino enterprise and 400-guest room hotel have been opened and made available for public use at their permanent location and maintained in that status.” MCL 432.212(15)(a). Greektown received a temporary certificate of occupancy on the 400 guest room hotel on February 6, 2009, and opened all of the 400 guest rooms to the public on February 15, 2009.

The Company also has met the second requirement, that it had been in compliance with the Development Agreement for 30 consecutive days, however, the City had asserted that it did not believe Greektown was in compliance with the Development Agreement.

On October 9, 2009, the Debtors filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court to approve a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with the City, which resolved all disputes with the City. The Bankruptcy Court approved the Settlement Agreement on February 22, 2010, which reached a resolution of all disputes with the City. The Settlement Agreement provides, among other things:

• The City should use its best efforts to support the Debtors efforts in obtaining the Tax Rollback effective as of February 15, 2009 before the MGCB (which was subsequently obtained on March 9, 2010);

• The Debtors should pay the City a settlement amount in the aggregate of $16,629,000 (the “Settlement Payment”), less certain credits described below, subject to the following provisions: (i) the Debtor should pay initial cash payment of $3.5 million (the “Initial Cash Payment”) within two business days after entry of an order by the Bankruptcy court approving the Settlement Agreement; (ii) a credit should be applied to reduce the Settlement Payment in an amount equal to the difference between (a) the amount of gaming taxes actually paid to the City between February 15, 2009 and February 15, 2010 and (b) the

F-21

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

	amount of gaming taxes that would have been paid through the date of the settlement to the City had the Tax Rollback been effective as of February 15, 2009); and (iii) the Debtors should pay a final cash amount of $9,600,000 (“Final Cash Payment”), which is the remaining amount of Settlement Payment after the Initial Cash Payment and the application of the credit described above.
•	Upon the receipt of the Final Cash Payment, the City should be deemed to have dismissed and waived any and all claims of default under the Development Agreement;
•	The City should cease its demand for a 1% tax increase due to the delayed completion of the Expanded Complex;
•	The City should consent to the transfer of the ownership of the Greektown Casino and the Development Agreement to the reorganized Debtors in accordance with the Plan; and
•	The City should take actions to dismiss all related litigation.

The Settlement Agreement was conditioned upon (i) approval of the Settlement Agreement by the Bankruptcy Court, which was obtained on February 22, 2010; and (ii) final approvals of the Settlement Agreement from various offices of the City, which was obtained on February 24, 2010.

On March 9, 2010, the Michigan Gaming Control Board certified that the casino was in compliance with the development agreement as of February 15, 2009 and as such was entitled to a tax adjustment retroactive to February 15, 2009. As a result of the retroactive adjustment, the Company recorded a receivable from the State of Michigan for approximately $12.3 million at December 31, 2009.

On December 11, 2007, the Company entered into an Acknowledgement of Violation (“AOV”) with the Michigan Gaming Control Board. The AOV included four complaints addressing procurement, kiosks, electronic gaming device meters, and signage. Under the terms of the AOV, a total fine of $750,000 was assessed, of which $300,000 was immediately payable and $450,000 would not be an obligation unless the Company commits further violation for three years. The Company recorded the $300,000 as expense during 2007. The remaining amount has not been recorded as no further violations occurred during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Millennium Management Group LLC (“Millennium”) was previously retained to provide the Company with certain consulting services related to the operation of the casino for a period through November 30, 2010, $1 million was paid for the year ended December 31, 2007 under the terms of this agreement. During 2008, a motion was filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to reject the contract and the motion was granted by the bankruptcy judge.

In 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with the Fine Point Group (the “Consultants”) as required by the bankruptcy court. The Consultants received a fixed fee of $150,000 per month plus expenses.

The Consultants also received a success fee, which was calculated on a quarterly basis, based on preset EBITDAR numbers.

F-22

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The table below shows the budgeted EBITDAR numbers that were required to be attained in order to receive the success fee:

	A			B
Quarter ended:
03/31/09		$	9,436,000		$	11,534,000
06/30/09			11,058,000			13,515,000
09/30/09			10,688,000			13,063,000
12/31/09			13,818,000			16,888,000
		$	45,000,000		$	55,000,000

For any calendar quarter during 2009, the success fee was equal to: (i) 10% of the amount by which actual quarterly EBITDAR exceeds the amount referenced in column A for the corresponding quarter, up to the amount referenced in column B; plus (ii) 30% of the amount by which actual quarterly EBITDAR exceeds the amount referenced in column B for the corresponding quarter. For purposes of calculating EBITDAR, the fees earned by and owing to the consultants, including all out of pocket expenses reimbursed to the Consultants, shall be included as expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2009, expenses related to the consulting agreement with the Fine Point Group consisted of the following: success fees of $6,240,000, fixed fees of $1,725,000 and expenses of $434,000. The Consultants’ agreement expired as of December 31, 2009 and was not renewed.

During the construction period, the Company entered into several agreements with various vendors providing goods and services related to the development of the Expanded Complex. As of December 31, 2009, there were no material commitments related to construction of the Expanded Complex.

The Company is a defendant in various pending litigation. In management’s opinion, the ultimate outcome of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or the financial position of the Company.

The Revised Development Agreement also provides that should a triggering event as defined, occur, the Company must sell its assets, business, and operations as a going concern at their fair market value to a developer named by the City.

12. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

The following tables present selected quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

	2009 Quarter Ended
	March 31				June 30				September 30				December 31
	(In Thousands)
Net revenues		$	78,568			$	85,500			$	86,272			$	81,265
Operating expenses			64,608				66,857				70,901				76,833
Income from operations			13,960				18,643				15,371				4,432
Net loss			(10,208	)			(10,902	)			(15,997	)			(28,837	)

	2008 Quarter Ended
	March 31				June 30			September 30				December 31
	(In Thousands)
Net revenues		$	80,538			$	72,887		$	69,100			$	64,203
Operating expenses			65,590				60,474			58,250				188,135
Income (loss) from operations			14,948				12,413			10,850				(123,932	)
Net (loss) income			(3,626	)			929			(9,643	)			(140,568	)

F-23

GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

13. Long-Term Payables to the City

Under the original Development Agreement among the Company, the City, and the EDC, the Company was required to provide letters of credit (“LOCs”) to support certain bonds issued by the EDC in connection with the acquisition and development of a proposed permanent casino site. Under the Revised Development Agreement, the Company was required to maintain its standby LOCs, totaling $49,928,000, recorded as a long-term payable for the year ended December 31, 2007, to secure principal and interest payments on certain bonds issued by the EDC; however, the LOCs were redeemed as a result of the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy filing. On June 12, 2008, the EDC redeemed the LOCs for a total amount of $49,393,000 of which $49,360,000 was the payment of the principal amount and the $33,000 was accrued interest through eleven (11) days of June, which resulted in the retirement of the long-term payable to the City and effectively converted the balance to secured debt in default. The proceeds of the bonds were used to acquire land along the Detroit River, where the permanent casino facilities were initially proposed to be located. Under the Revised Development Agreement, the Company and the other Detroit casino developers will forgo their right to receive any of the land.

14. 401(k) Plan

Employees of the Company can participate in a 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”). For union employees, Greektown Casino shall make contributions to the Plan based on years of service. The total payments made and expense recognized under the Plan by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 amounted to $1,606,000, $1,969,000, and $2,178,000, respectively. In December 2008, the Company terminated the matching contribution as it relates to salaried employees.

15. Lawsuit Settlement Obligation

A settlement agreement was reached in various lawsuits that were filed challenging the constitutionality of the Casino Development Competitive Selection Process Ordinance. As of December 31, 2009, payments totaling $17 million have been made against this settlement obligation. Additional payments required under the agreement include $1 million (inclusive of interest) annually for the next 24 years through 2031. As a result of the Chapter 11 filing the estimated settlement of $12,303,000 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, is classified as “Liabilities Subject to Compromise” and no payments have been made in 2009.

F-24

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009

	Historical Greektown Holdings, L.L.C.			Pro Forma Adjustments (See note 2)												Greektown Superholdings, Inc. Pro Forma As Adjusted
				Plan Effect Adjustments						Fresh Start Adjustments
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	25,692		$	(5,640	)	2(a	)		$	—					$	20,052
Certificates of deposit			530			—						—						530
Accounts receivable—gaming, net			3,603			—						—						3,603
Accounts receivable—other, net			1,069			—						—						1,069
Notes receivable			2.460			—						—						2,460
Inventories			433			—						—						433
Litigation trust loan receivable			—			375		2(b	)			—						375
State of Michigan gaming tax refundable			12,328			—						—						12,328
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			19,498			—						—						19,498
Total current assets			65,613			(5,265	)					—						60,348
Property, building and equipment, net			472,271			—						(52,437	)	2(n	)			419,834
Financing fees, net			9,712			4,223		2(c	)			—						13,935
Deposits and other assets			30			—						—						30
Other identifiable intangible assets:
Trade names			—			—						18,500		2(o	)			18,500
Rated player relationships			—			—						30,000		2(o	)			30,000
Casino development rights			—			—						63,600		2(o	)			63,600
Total other identifiable intangible assets			—			—						112,100						112,100
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets (note 1)			—			65,498						(59,663	)					5,835
Total assets		$	547,626		$	64,456					$	—					$	612,082

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements

PF-1

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 (Continued)

	Historical Greektown Holdings, L.L.C.				Pro Forma Adjustments (See note 2)								Greektown Superholdings, Inc. Pro Forma As Adjusted
					Plan Effect Adjustments					Fresh Start Adjustments
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Liabilities and shareholders’/members’ equity (deficit)
Current liabilities, not subject to compromise:
Debtor-in-possession financing		$	190,037			$	(190,037	)	2(d)		$	—		$	—
Secured debt in default			342,054				(342,054	)	2(e)			—			—
Accounts payable			12,846				—					—			12,846
Accrued City of Detroit settlement			13,547				—					—			13,547
Accrued interest			1,650				(1,650	)	2(f)			—			—
Current Michigan Business Tax payable			—				5,898		2(g)			—			5,898
Notes payable			1,890				—					—			1,890
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			20,947				(12,020	)	2(h)			—			8,927
Total current liabilities, not subject to compromise			582,971				(539,863	)				—			43,108
Long-term liabilities, not subject to compromise
New senior secured revolving credit facility			—				—		2(i)			—			—
New senior secured notes, net of discount			—				362,360		2(j)			—			362,360
Obligation under capital lease			786				—					—			786
Deferred Michigan Business Tax, net			2,370				587		2(g)			—			2,957
Total long-term liabilities, not subject to compromise			3,156				362,947					—			366,103
Liabilities subject to compromise			252,420				(242,420	)	2(k)			—			10,000
Shareholders’/members’ equity (deficit)			(290,921	)			483,792		2(a),(l),(m)			—			192,871
Total liabilities and shareholders’/members’ equity (deficit)		$	547,626			$	64,456				$	—		$	612,082

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements

PF-2

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009

	Historical Greektown Holdings, L.L.C.				Pro Forma Adjustments (See note 2)											Greektown Superholdings, Inc. Pro Forma As Adjusted
					Plan Effect Adjustments					Fresh Start Adjustments
	(In thousands)
Revenues
Casino		$	332,878			$	—				$	—					$	332,878
Food and beverage			22,524				—					—						22,524
Hotel			7,880				—					—						7,880
Other			4,958				—					—						4,958
Total revenues			368,240				—					—						368,240
Less: promotional allowances			36,635				—					—						36,635
Net revenues			331,605				—					—						331,605
Operating expenses
Direct operating expenses			192,710				—					2,606		3(d	)			195,316
Indirect operating expenses			86,489				—					—						86,489
Total operating expenses			279,199				—					2,606						281,805
Income from operations			52,406				—					(2,606	)					49,800
Chapter 11 related reorganization items			(28,711	)			28,711	3(a	)			—						—
Other expenses:
Interest expense			(69,998	)			19,388	3(b	)			—						(50,610	)
Amortization of finance fees and accretion of discount on senior notes			(12,923	)			5,608	3(c	)			—						(7,315	)
Interest income			171				—					—						171
Consulting company success fee			(6,240	)			—					—						(6,240	)
Miscellaneous income			163				—					—						163
Total other expenses			(88,827	)			24,996					—						(63,831	)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes			(65,132	)			53,707					(2,606	)					(14,031	)
Michigan Business Tax—current			(1,117	)			—					—						(1,117	)
Michigan Business Tax—deferred			305				—					—						305
Net loss		$	(65,944	)		$	53,707				$	(2,606	)				$	(14,843	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements

PF-3

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

1. Basis of Presentation

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of financial position and unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations (collectively, the “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”) give effect to the Second Amended Joint Plans of Reorganization for the Debtors Proposed by the Noteholder Plan Proponents Including Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and Indenture Trustee (the “Plan”) as described in Item 1—“Business—Bankruptcy Considerations” and elsewhere in this registration statement. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements give effect to the Plan, including the transactions contemplated under the Exit Financing and Rights Offering and the estimated impact of the adoption of Fresh Start Accounting as if they were effective and adopted, for statement of financial position purposes, on December 31, 2009 and, for statement of operations purposes, as of January 1, 2009.

There can be no assurances that the Plan becomes effective or that the Exit Financing and Rights Offering transactions are consummated. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been reported if the Plan, including the Exit Financing and Rights Offering transactions, was effective and if Fresh Start Accounting was adopted on the date specified, nor are they indicative of our future results of operations or financial condition. The pro forma adjustments are based upon currently available information and upon certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by, Item 2—“Financial Information—Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the audited financial statements of Greektown Holdings and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this registration statement.

The following table reflects a preliminary determination of the estimated pro forma reorganization value of $603,412 assuming that the Plan was effective, the Exit Financing and Rights Offering transactions were consummated and Fresh Start Accounting was adopted as of December 31, 2009.

Pre-petition obligations, not subject to compromise:
Secured debt in default	$	342,054
Principal amount of swap terminations		12,020
Obligations under capital lease		786
Assumption of general unsecured claims per Plan		10,000
Claims pursuant to §503(b)9 of the Bankruptcy Code and other settlements		800
Total pre-petition obligations, not subject to compromise		365,660
Other assumed liabilities:
Debtor-in-possession financing		190,037
Accounts payable (post-petition)		12,846
Accrued City of Detroit settlement		13,547
Accrued interest		1,650
Current Michigan Business Tax payable		5,898
Notes payable		1,890
Deferred Michigan Business Tax, net		2,957
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		8,927
Total other assumed liabilities		237,752
Total reorganization value	$	603,412

PF-4

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)—(Continued)

The following table reflects the preliminary allocation of the estimated pro forma reorganization value of $603,412 to identifiable tangible and intangible assets:

Current assets:
Cash and equivalents	$	25,692
Certificates of deposit		530
Accounts receivable—gaming, net		3,603
Accounts receivable—other, net		1,069
Notes receivable		2,460
Inventories		433
State of Michigan gaming tax refundable		12,328
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		19,498
Total current assets		65,613
Property, building and equipment		419,834
Deposits and other assets		30
Other identifiable intangible assets:
Trade names		18,500
Rated player relationships		30,000
Development rights		63,600
Total other identifiable intangible assets		112,100
Total identifiable assets		597,577
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets		5,835
Total reorganization value	$	603,412

2. Notes to Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

The following is a brief description of the pro forma adjustments to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of financial position to give effect to the Plan, including the transactions contemplated under the Exit Financing and the Rights Offering, as well as the estimated financial impact of the adoption of Fresh Start Accounting as if they were effective and adopted on December 31, 2009.

a. Cash and cash equivalents. The following estimated schedule of sources and uses from the Plan, the Exit Financing and the Rights Offering illustrates the components of the net adjustment to cash and cash equivalents of $5,640.

Sources of cash:

Proceeds from issuance of New Senior Secured Notes—series A (net of 5% original issue discount)

 

$

258,400

 

Proceeds from issuance of New Senior Secured Notes—series B (net of 8% original issue discount)

  

103,960

 

Net Proceeds from Rights Offering (net of Cash Put Premium)

  

196,000

 

On-hand cash and cash equivalents

  

5,640

 

Total sources of cash

 

$

564,000

 

PF-5

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)—(Continued)

Uses of cash:
Debtor-in-possession financing	$	190,037
Secured debt in default		342,054
Principal amount of swap terminations		12,020
Accrued interest		1,650
Advances to fund litigation trust under the Plan		375
Claims pursuant to § 503(b)9 of the Bankruptcy Code and other settlements		800
Exit financing commitment and underwriting fees		13,935
Estimated transaction fees		3,129
Total uses of cash	$	564,000

b.	Litigation trust loan receivable. Represents an adjustment to record a non-recourse loan in the amount of $375 which is required to be loaned from Greektown Superholdings to fund the fees, expenses and costs of a liquidating trust established pursuant to Section 4.12 of the Plan.
c.	Financing fees, net. Represents an adjustment to eliminate the deferred financing fees, net of accumulated amortization of Greektown Holdings on the Effective Date and establish the estimated deferred financing fees in connection with the Exit Financing, consisting of a 1.5% commitment fee on the entire $385,000 in principal amount of New Senior Secured Notes and a 3.0% 144A underwriting fee associated with the Series A New Senior Secured Notes in principal amount of $272,000. Greektown Superholdings is currently seeking a revolving lender and anticipates that it will obtain a commitment for the Revolving Loan prior to the Effective Date. Additional fees may be incurred in connection with obtaining the Revolving Loan, which cannot be determined at this time.
d.	Debtor-in-possession financing. Represents an adjustment to record the payment on the Effective Date of the principal amount of the DIP Facility, inclusive of PIK interest, from the proceeds of the Exit Financing and the Rights Offering.
e.	Secured debt in default. Represents an adjustment to record the payment on the Effective Date of the amount of the pre-petition senior secured obligations of the Debtors and accrued interest thereon from the proceeds of the Exit Financing and the Rights Offering.
f.	Accrued interest. Represents an adjustment to reflect the payment on the Effective Date of accrued cash interest on the DIP Facility and accrued interest on the principal amount of swap terminations.
g.	Michigan Business Tax. As discussed elsewhere in this registration statement, on July 12, 2007, the Michigan legislature enacted the Michigan Business Tax (“MBT”) which is considered an income tax under the provisions of the Income Taxes topic of the ASC. The MBT has a gross receipts tax and an income tax component. Due to these changes, the enactment has resulted in the recording of both a deferred tax asset and a deferred tax liability related to the new tax. The deferred tax asset was approximately $1.2 million and the deferred tax liability was approximately $4.1 million at December 31, 2009, including the pro forma adjustments. These amounts are presented as a net long term deferred tax liability of approximately $2.9 million. The deferred tax asset is the result of future deductions allowed under the enactment provisions of the new law for the 2015 to 2029 tax years, whereas the deferred tax liability is the result of the enactment of the law and the liability resulting from the temporary differences related to capital acquisitions reversing in future periods related to the gross receipts calculation.

PF-6

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)—(Continued)

h.	Accrued expenses and other liabilities. Represents an adjustment to reflect the payment on the Effective Date of the principal amount of swap terminations related to two pre-petition interest rate swap agreements.
i.	New Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility. It is anticipated that the Exit Financing will incorporate a Revolving Loan with a $30 million commitment amount that is expected to be undrawn on the Effective Date.
j.	New Senior Secured Notes. Represents an adjustment to record the New Senior Secured Notes, net of original issue discounts as summarized in the table below.

	Face Amount of Notes			Original Issue Discount Rate			Original Issue Discount			Net Proceeds
Series A Senior Secured Notes		$	272,000		5.0	%		$	13,600		$	258,400
Series B Senior Secured Notes			113,000		8.0	%			9,040			103,960
Total		$	385,000					$	22,640		$	362,360

k.

Liabilities subject to compromise. Represents an adjustment to reduce the balance of liabilities subject to compromise down to $10 million reflecting the treatment provided for under the Plan whereby general unsecured claimants will receive their pro rata share of $10 million in cash payable over 4 quarterly installments during the initial year following the Effective Date.

l.

Cancellation of previous ownership interests and Issuance of new equity securities. Reflects the entries necessary to record (i) the cancellation of previous ownership interests in Greektown Holdings (ii) the net anticipated proceeds from the Rights Offering of $196 million which are net of the Cash Put Premium as described elsewhere in the registration statement, and (iii) the anticipated issuance of series A-1 and A-2 convertible preferred stock, including the issuance of certain shares of series A-1 and A-2 convertible preferred stock with detachable warrants, as well as the issuance of series A-1 common stock on the Effective Date under the Plan and the Rights Offering. George Boyer, chairman of the board of directors of Greektown Superholdings, Inc., will be entitled to an annual retainer of $225,000, payable 50% in cash and 50% in restricted stock, which will vest quarterly over a one-year period. In addition, on the Effective Date, Mr. Boyer will receive a one-time grant of restricted stock valued at $225,000, which vests ratably over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the Effective Date.

m.

Accumulated (deficit)/Retained earnings. Reflects the elimination of the accumulated deficit of Greektown Holdings on the Effective Date and to record the retained earnings impact of the expensing of the $3,129 of estimated transaction fees as illustrated in note 2(a) hereto.

n.

Property, building and equipment, net. Represents an adjustment to record property, building and equipment at estimated fair value as set forth in the table below. The determination of fair value of assets and liabilities is subject to significant estimation and assumptions and there can be no assurances that the estimates, assumptions and values reflected in the valuations will be realized and actual results could vary materially. In accordance with accounting guidance for business combinations, the preliminary allocation of the enterprise value is subject to additional adjustments to the extent that improved information on assets and liability valuations becomes available.

PF-7

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)—(Continued)

	Net Book Value			Estimated Fair Value			Difference				Assumed Useful Life
Property, building and equipment:
Land		$	104,391		$	80,000		$	(24,391	)	n/a
Building and improvements			326,620			292,929			(33,691	)	39 years
Gaming equipment and furnishings			12,138			31,108			18,970		5 years
Non-gaming equipment and furnishings			20,561			7,236			(13,325	)	5 years
Construction in progress			8,561			8,561			—		n/a
Total property, building and equipment		$	472,271		$	419,834		$	(52,437	)

o. Other identifiable intangible assets. Represents an adjustment to record other identifiable intangible assets related to Greektown Holdings’ trade names, rated player relationships and casino development rights under the Development Agreement at estimated fair value as set forth in the table below. The determination of fair value of assets and liabilities is subject to significant estimation and assumptions and there can be no assurances that the estimates, assumptions and values reflected in the valuations will be realized and actual results could vary materially. In accordance with accounting guidance for business combinations, the preliminary allocation of the enterprise value is subject to additional adjustments to the extent that improved information on assets and liability valuations becomes available.

 

Net
Book Value

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Difference

 

Assumed
Useful Life

Other identifiable intangible assets:

Trade names

 

$

—

  

$

18,500

  

$

18,500

  

Indefinite

Rated player relationships

  

—

   

30,000

   

30,000

  

5 years

Casino development rights

  

—

   

63,600

   

63,600

  

Indefinite

Total other identifiable intangible assets

 

$

—

  

$

112,100

  

$

112,100

 

3. Notes to Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

The following is a brief description of the pro forma adjustments to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations to give effect to the Plan, including the transactions contemplated under the Exit Financing and the Rights Offering, as well as the estimated financial impact of the adoption of Fresh Start Accounting as if they were effective and adopted on January 1, 2009.

a.	Chapter 11 reorganization items. Reflects an adjustment to eliminate the actual Chapter 11 reorganization related expenses incurred by Greektown Holdings.
b.	Interest expense. Reflects an adjustment to reflect interest on the interest bearing indebtedness that is anticipated to be outstanding upon the Effective Date including the New Senior Secured Notes and existing capital lease indebtedness. The New Senior Secured Notes will bear interest at a fixed rate of 13% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears.
c.	Amortization of finance fees and accretion of discount on senior notes. Reflects an adjustment to record the amortization of deferred finance fees associated with the New Senior Secured Notes over the 5-year term of the New Senior Secured Notes and the amortization of original issue discounts on the series A and series B notes on a straight-line basis over the 5-year term of the New Senior Secured Notes.

PF-8

GREEKTOWN SUPERHOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)—(Continued)

d. Direct operating expenses. Reflects an adjustment to depreciation and amortization to give effect to the estimated impact of the revaluation of property, building and equipment and other identifiable intangible assets to estimated fair value under Fresh Start Accounting. The table below illustrates the calculation of the adjustment.

	Estimated Fair Value			Assumed Useful Life	Straight-Line Depreciation/ Amortization
Property, building and equipment:
Land		$	80,000	n/a		$	—
Building and improvements			292,929	39 years			7,511
Gaming equipment and furnishings			31,108	5 years			6,222
Non-gaming equipment and furnishings			7,236	5 years			1,447
Construction in progress			8,561	n/a			—
Total property, building and equipment		$	419,834				15,180
Other identifiable intangible assets:
Trade names		$	18,500	Indefinite			—
Rated player relationships			30,000	5 years			6,000
Casino development rights			63,600	Indefinite			—
Total other identifiable intangible assets		$	112,100				6,000
Total pro forma depreciation and amortization						$	21,180
Less: actual depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2009							18,574
Difference						$	2,606

PF-9