Atel 15 10-Q 2015 Q1 Quarterly report

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015

o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from          to         

Commission File number 333-174418

ATEL 15, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California	45-1625956
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)	(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.)

The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code(415) 989-8800

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:Limited Liability Company Units

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesx Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer o     Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yeso Nox

The number of Limited Liability Company Units outstanding as of April 30, 2015 was 6,615,221.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

ATEL 15, LLC
  
Index

Part I. Financial Information		3
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)		3
Balance Sheets, March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014		3
Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014		4
Statements of Changes in Members’ Capital for the year ended December 31, 2014 and for the three months ended March 31, 2015		5
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014		6
Notes to the Financial Statements		7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		26
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		32
Part II. Other Information		33
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		33
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		33
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		33
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures		33
Item 5. Other Information		33
Item 6. Exhibits		33

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).

ATEL 15, LLC
 
BALANCE SHEETS
 
MARCH 31, 2015 AND DECEMBER 31, 2014
(in thousands)

	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,482	$	7,214
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1 at March 31, 2015 and $1 at December 31, 2014		151		166
Notes receivable, net of unearned interest income of $440 and allowance for credit losses of $27 at March 31, 2015 and net of unearned interest income of $580 and allowance for credit losses of $0 at December 31, 2014		3,227		3,786
Due from affiliate		733		—
Investment in securities		125		125
Fair value of warrants		848		848
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $13,371 at March 31, 2015 and $11,524 at December 31, 2014		47,178		48,823
Prepaid expenses and other assets		60		51
Total assets	$	59,804	$	61,013
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Managing Member	$	49	$	51
Affiliates		—		8
Accrued distributions to Other Members		623		625
Other		179		166
Non-recourse debt		17,708		17,362
Long-term debt		2,068		2,068
Unearned operating lease income and/or advance payments		654		421
Total liabilities		21,281		20,701
Commitments and contingencies
Members’ capital:
Managing Member		—		—
Other Members		38,523		40,312
Total Members’ capital		38,523		40,312
Total liabilities and Members’ capital	$	59,804	$	61,013

See accompanying notes.

3

ATEL 15, LLC
 
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2015 AND 2014
(in thousands except units and per unit data)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Revenues:
Leasing and lending activities:
Operating leases	$	2,528		$	2,351
Direct financing leases		—			1
Interest on notes receivable		106			131
Gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes		68			31
Gain on sales or dispositions of securities		—			6
Unrealized loss on fair valuation of warrants		—			(140	)
Other		18			16
Total revenues		2,720			2,396
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets		1,985			1,990
Asset management fees to Managing Member		140			124
Acquisition expense		(29	)		246
Cost reimbursements to Managing Member and/or affiliates		374			309
Provision for credit losses		27			—
Amortization of initial direct costs		32			15
Interest expense		142			143
Professional fees		63			60
Outside services		17			21
Railcar maintenance		38			29
Bank charges		51			52
Other		60			70
Total expenses		2,900			3,059
Net loss	$	(180	)	$	(663	)
Net income (loss):
Managing Member	$	121		$	121
Other Members		(301	)		(784	)
	$	(180	)	$	(663	)
Net loss per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.12	)
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		6,615,221			6,620,971

See accompanying notes.

4

ATEL 15, LLC
 
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014
AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2015
(in thousands except units and per unit data)

	Units			Amount						Total
				Other Members			Managing Member
Balance December 31, 2013		6,620,971		$	47,717		$	—		$	47,717
Repurchases of Units		(5,750	)		(41	)		—			(41	)
Distributions to Other Members ($0.90 per Unit)		—			(5,957	)		—			(5,957	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—			—			(483	)		(483	)
Net (loss) income		—			(1,407	)		483			(924	)
Balance December 31, 2014		6,615,221			40,312			—			40,312
Distributions to Other Members ($0.22 per Unit)		—			(1,488	)		—			(1,488	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—			—			(121	)		(121	)
Net (loss) income		—			(301	)		121			(180	)
Balance March 31, 2015 (Unaudited)		6,615,221		$	38,523		$	—		$	38,523

See accompanying notes.

5

ATEL 15, LLC
 
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2015 AND 2014
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(180	)	$	(663	)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes		(68	)		(31	)
Depreciation of operating lease assets		1,985			1,990
Amortization of initial direct costs		32			15
Provision for credit losses		27			—
Gain on sale of securities		—			(6	)
Unrealized loss on fair valuation of warrants		—			140
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		15			(28	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(9	)		(22	)
Accounts payable, Managing Member		(2	)		(29	)
Accounts payable, other		13			26
Accrued liabilities, affiliates		(741	)		(442	)
Unearned fee income related to notes receivable		(4	)		(9	)
Unearned operating lease income and/or advance payments		233			(114	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,301			827
Investing activities:
Purchases of equipment on operating leases		(355	)		(1,419	)
Proceeds from sales of lease assets and early termination of notes		101			590
Proceeds from sale of securities		—			6
Payments of initial direct costs		(30	)		(98	)
Principal payments received on direct financing leases		13			10
Principal payments received on notes receivable		503			697
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		232			(214	)
Financing activities:
Borrowings under non-recourse debt		1,558			—
Repayments under non-recourse debt		(1,212	)		(908	)
Distributions to Other Members		(1,490	)		(1,486	)
Distributions to Managing Member		(121	)		(121	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,265	)		(2,515	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		268			(1,902	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		7,214			12,749
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	7,482		$	10,847
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	124		$	150
Cash paid during the period for taxes	$	2		$	1
Schedule of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Distributions payable to Other Members at period-end	$	623		$	624
Distributions payable to Managing Member at period-end	$	50		$	50
Purchases of equipment, included in accounts payable, other	$	—		$	36
Transfer of operating lease assets to affiliate	$	—		$	527

See accompanying notes.

6

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

ATEL 15, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on March 4, 2011 for the purpose of raising capital and originating equipment financing transactions and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. The Managing Member of the Company is ATEL Managing Member, LLC (the “Managing Member” or the “Manager”), a Nevada limited liability company. The Managing Member is controlled by ATEL Financial Services (“AFS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group. The Fund may continue until terminated as provided in the ATEL 15, LLC Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement dated October 28, 2011 (the “Operating Agreement”). Contributions in the amount of $500 were received as of May 3, 2011, which represented the initial Member’s capital investment. As a limited liability company, the liability of any individual member for the obligations of the Fund is limited to the extent of capital contributions to the Fund by the individual member. The offering of the Company was granted effectiveness by the Securities and Exchange Commission as of October 28, 2011.

As of December 21, 2011, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, representing $1.2 million), excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors, had been received and the Fund requested subscription proceeds to be released from escrow. On that date, the Company commenced initial operations and continued in its development stage activities until transitioning to an operating enterprise during the first quarter of 2012. Pennsylvania subscriptions are subject to a separate escrow and are released to the Fund only when aggregate subscriptions for all investors equal to not less than $7.5 million. Total contributions to the Fund exceeded $7.5 million on April 4, 2012, at which time a request was processed to release the Pennsylvania escrowed amounts. The offering was terminated on October 28, 2013.

Through March 31, 2015, cumulative contributions of $66.5 million (inclusive of the $500 initial Member’s capital investment), representing 6,653,171 Units, have been received. Through the same date, a net total of $283 thousand of such contributions (representing 37,950 Units) have been rescinded or repurchased (net of distributions paid and allocated syndication costs) by the Company. As of March 31, 2015, 6,615,221 Units were issued and outstanding.

The Fund, or Managing Member on behalf of the Fund, has and will continue to incur costs in connection with the organization, registration and issuance of the Units. The amount of such costs to be borne by the Fund is limited by certain provisions of the Operating Agreement.

The Company’s principal objectives are to invest in a diversified portfolio of investments that will (i) preserve, protect and return the Company’s invested capital; (ii) generate regular cash distributions to Unitholders, with any balance remaining after required minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional investments during the Reinvestment Period (ending six calendar years after the completion of the Company’s public offering of Units) and (iii) provide additional cash distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all investment portfolio assets has been sold or otherwise disposed. The Company is governed by its Operating Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreement, the Managing Member and/or its affiliates receives compensation for services rendered and reimbursements for costs incurred on behalf of the Company (See Note 6). The Company is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of the Managing Member.

These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

7

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q as mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the Managing Member, necessary for a fair statement of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain prior period amounts may have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no significant effect on the reported financial position or results of operations.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

In preparing the accompanying financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Managing Member, events that have occurred after March 31, 2015 up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require additional disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements.

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts and reserve for credit losses on notes receivable.

Segment reporting:

The Company is organized into one operating segment for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.

The Company’s principal decision makers are the Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The Company believes that its equipment leasing and financing business operates as one reportable segment because: a) the Company measures profit and loss at the equipment portfolio level as a whole; b) the principal decision makers do not review information based on any operating segment other than the equipment leasing and financing transaction portfolio; c) the Company does not maintain discrete financial information on any specific segment other than its equipment financing operations; d) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around different products and services other than equipment leasing and financing; and e) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around geographic areas.

The primary geographic region in which the Company seeks leasing and financing opportunities is North America. All of the Company’s current operating revenues and long-lived assets relate to customers domiciled in North America.

8

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Investment in securities:

From time to time, the Company may purchase securities of its borrowers or receive warrants to purchase securities in connection with its lending arrangements.

Purchased securities

Purchased securities are generally not registered for public sale and are carried at cost. Such securities are adjusted to fair value if the fair value is less than the carrying value and such impairment is deemed by the Managing Member to be other than temporary. Factors considered by the Managing Member in determining fair value include, but are not limited to, available financial information, the issuer’s ability to meet its current obligations and indications of the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital. The Company had $125 thousand of purchased securities at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. There were no sales or dispositions of purchased securities during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Warrants

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are reflected at an estimated fair value on the balance sheet as determined by the Managing Member. The Company’s portfolio of warrants had an estimated fair value of $848 thousand at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The Company did not record unrealized gains or losses on fair valuation of its warrants during the three months ended March 31, 2015. By comparison, the Company recorded $140 thousand of unrealized losses on fair valuation of its warrants during the prior year period. The Company also recognized gains on the net exercise of warrants totaling $6 thousand during the prior year period. There were no net exercise of warrants during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Per Unit data:

Net loss and distributions per Unit is based upon the weighted average number of Other Members Units outstanding during the period.

Recent accounting pronouncements:

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company evaluated the impact of the new standard on its financial statements and has determined that such impact is virtually non-existent as the new revenue guideline does not affect revenues from leases and loans, which comprise the majority of the Company’s revenues.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The new standard provides guidance relative to management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements.

9

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

3. Notes receivable, net:

The Company has various notes receivables from borrowers who have financed the purchase of equipment through the Company. As of March 31, 2105, the terms of the notes receivable are from 30 to 42 months and bear interest at rates ranging from 11.26% to 18.00% per annum. The notes are secured by the equipment financed. The notes mature from 2015 through 2017.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had three notes receivable which were on non-accrual status, one of which was fully paid on February 24, 2015 with the remaining two still on non-accrual status at March 31, 2015.

The note fully paid in February 2015 was originally placed on nonaccrual status during the second quarter of 2014. Such note had net recorded investment approximating $85 thousand as of December 31, 2014 and was considered impaired relative to its payment term. The term of this note was modified to defer the repayment of principal until November 1, 2014 while maintaining interest-only payments at its original rate of 12.00%. Upon the resumption of principal and interest payments in November 2014, the monthly payments were adjusted such that the ultimate total payments would reflect interest earned at a composite rate of 18.00% per annum as related to the entire term of the indebtedness from the original funding date. Payments received on this note have been fully applied against principal pursuant to the Company’s policy on non-accrual notes. Interest not recorded relative to the original term of the non-accrual note approximated $8 thousand from June 2014 to February 2015. The note has remained current with respect to its restructured term; and, management has determined that no adjustment was necessary to reflect fair value through its termination date. The Fund recognized gains of $52 thousand from the February 24, 2015 settlement of the note on proceeds of $81 thousand.

With regards to the two notes remaining on non-accrual status as of March 31, 2015, their combined net recorded investment totaled $89 thousand and $92 thousand as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Both notes have a rate of 11.73%. As of March 31, 2015, management continued to deem the notes impaired and recorded fair value adjustments totaling $27 thousand to reflect the fair value of such notes at $62 thousand. There were no fair value adjustments at December 31, 2014. Effective January 1, 2015, the terms of these notes were modified to defer the repayment of principal while maintaining interest-only payments at their original rates. As of July 1, 2015, the entire balance outstanding on these notes will be due. The payments will be adjusted such that the ultimate amounts paid will reflect interest earned at a composite rate of 18.00% per annum as related to the entire term of the indebtedness from the original funding date. Payments received on these nonaccrual notes have been fully applied against principal pursuant to the Company’s policy on non-accrual notes. Interest not recorded relative to the original terms of the non-accrual notes approximated $3 thousand from December 2014 to March 2015.

As of March 31, 2015, the minimum future payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):

Nine months ending December 31, 2015	$	1,554
Year ending December 31, 2016		1,671
2017		458
		3,683
Less: portion representing unearned interest income		(440	)
		3,243
Unamortized initial direct costs		11
Less: allowance for credit losses		(27	)
Notes receivable, net	$	3,227

10

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

3. Notes receivable, net: - (continued)

Initial direct costs (“IDC”) amortization expense related to notes receivable and the Company’s operating and direct financing leases for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
IDC amortization – notes receivable	$	4	$	5
IDC amortization – lease assets		28		10
Total	$	32	$	15

4. Allowance for credit losses:

The Company’s allowance for credit losses are as follows (in thousands):

	Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts						Valuation Adjustments on Financing Receivables				Total Allowance for Credit Losses
	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Operating Leases		Notes Receivable		Finance Leases
Balance December 31, 2013	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Provision for credit losses		—		—		1		—		—		1
Balance December 31, 2014		—		—		1		—		—		1
Provision for credit losses		—		—		—		27		—		27
Balance March 31, 2015	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	27	$	—	$	28

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable represent the amounts billed under operating and direct financing lease contracts, and notes receivable which are currently due to the Company.

Allowances for doubtful accounts are typically established based upon their aging and historical charge off and collection experience and the creditworthiness of specifically identified lessees and borrowers, and invoiced amounts. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are generally charged off against the allowance on a specific identification basis. Recoveries of amounts that were previously written-off are recorded as other income in the period received.

Accounts receivable are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with lease or note payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, such leases or notes may be placed in non-accrual status. Leases or notes placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. Until such time, revenues on operating leases are recognized on a cash basis. All payments received on amounts billed under direct financing leases and notes receivable are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

Financing receivables

In addition to the allowance established for delinquent accounts receivable, the total allowance related solely to financing receivables also includes anticipated impairment charges on notes receivable and direct financing leases.

11

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

4. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

Notes are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the note agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest when due. If it is determined that a loan is impaired with regard to scheduled payments, the Company will perform an analysis of the note to determine if an impairment valuation reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the note, or the collateral value of the property underlying the note when note repayment is collateral dependent. Any required valuation reserve is charged to earnings when determined; and notes are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

The asset underlying a direct financing lease contract is considered impaired if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than its net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date.

The Company’s allowance for credit losses (related solely to financing receivables) and its recorded investment in financing receivables as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows (in thousands):

March 31, 2015	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	27	$	—	$	27
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	27	$	—	$	27
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	3,2541	$	—	$	3,254
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,254	$	—	$	3,254
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—

¹ Includes $11 of unamortized initial direct costs.

12

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

4. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

December 31, 2014	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	3,7862	$	13	$	3,799
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,786	$	13	$	3,799
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—

² Includes $16 of unamortized initial direct costs.

The Company evaluates the credit quality of its financing receivables on a scale equivalent to the following quality indicators related to corporate risk profiles:

Pass – Any account whose lessee/debtor, co-lessee/debtor or any guarantor has a credit rating on publicly traded or privately placed debt issues as rated by Moody’s or S&P for either Senior Unsecured debt, Long Term Issuer rating or Issuer rating that are in the tiers of ratings generally recognized by the investment community as constituting an Investment Grade credit rating; or, has been determined by the Manager to be an Investment Grade Equivalent or High Quality Corporate Credit per its Credit Policy or has a Not Rated internal rating by the Manager and the account is not considered by the Chief Credit Officer of the Manager to fall into one of the three risk profiles below.

Special Mention – Any traditional corporate type account with potential weaknesses (e.g. large net losses or major industry downturns) or, any growth capital account that has less than three months of cash as of the end of the calendar quarter to fund their continuing operations. These accounts deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, those potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the Fund’s receivable at some future date.

Substandard – Any account that is inadequately protected by the current worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Accounts that are so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Fund will sustain some loss as the likelihood of fully collecting all receivables may be questionable if the deficiencies are not corrected. Such accounts are on the Manager’s Credit Watch List.

Doubtful – Any account where the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Accordingly, an account that is so classified is on the Manager’s Credit Watch List, and has been declared in default and the Manager has repossessed, or is attempting to repossess, the equipment it financed. This category includes impaired notes and leases as applicable.

13

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

4. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company’s financing receivables by credit quality indicator and by class of financing receivables are as follows (excludes initial direct costs) (in thousands):

	Notes Receivable				Finance Leases
	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Pass	$	2,798	$	2,911	$	—	$	13
Special mention		356		859		—		—
Substandard		89		—		—		—
Doubtful		—		—		—		—
Total	$	3,243	$	3,770	$	—	$	13

As of March 31, 2015, the Company’s impaired loans were as follows (in thousands):

	Impaired Loans
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
With an allowance recorded
Notes receivable		89		89		27		89		—
Total	$	89	$	89	$	27	$	89	$	—

There were no impaired loans as of December 31, 2014.

At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, investment in financing receivables is aged as follows (in thousands):

March 31, 2015	31 – 60 Days Past Due		61 – 90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment > 90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,243	$	3,243	$	—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,243	$	3,243	$	—

December 31, 2014	31 – 60 Days Past Due		61 – 90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment > 90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,770	$	3,770	$	—
Finance leases		—		—		—		—		13		13		—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,783	$	3,783	$	—

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had three notes receivable which were on non-accrual status, one of which was fully paid on February 24, 2015 with the remaining two still on non-accrual at March 31, 2015 (see Note 3).

14

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net:

The Company’s investment in leases consists of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2014		Reclassifications & Additions/ Dispositions		Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance March 31, 2015
Net investment in operating leases	$	48,480	$	351	$	(1,985	)	$	46,846
Net investment in direct financing leases		13		—		(13	)		—
Initial direct costs, net of accumulated amortization of $113 at March 31, 2015 and $85 at December 31, 2014		330		30		(28	)		332
Total	$	48,823	$	381	$	(2,026	)	$	47,178

Impairment of investments in leases:

Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place. The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances.

As a result of these reviews, management determined that no impairment losses existed during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

The Company utilizes a straight-line depreciation method for equipment in all of the categories currently in its portfolio of lease transactions. Depreciation expense on the Company’s equipment totaled $2.0 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

IDC amortization expense related to the Company’s operating leases and direct financing leases totaled $28 thousand and $10 thousand for the respective three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (see Note 3).

All of the Company’s leased property was acquired beginning in January 2012 through March 2015.

15

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

Operating leases:

Property on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2014			Additions			Reclassifications or Dispositions			Balance March 31, 2015
Marine vessel	$	19,410		$	—		$	—		$	19,410
Transportation, rail		10,930			29			—			10,959
Manufacturing		7,836			—			—			7,836
Food processing		5,200			—			—			5,200
Coal terminal		5,084			—			—			5,084
Materials handling		4,147			—			—			4,147
Construction		2,590			—			—			2,590
Research		2,250			—			—			2,250
Agriculture		1,786			326			—			2,112
Aviation		279			—			—			279
Computer		393			—			(142	)		251
Cleaning & maintenance		51			—			—			51
Transportation		48			—			—			48
		60,004			355			(142	)		60,217
Less accumulated depreciation		(11,524	)		(1,985	)		138			(13,371	)
Total	$	48,480		$	(1,630	)	$	(4	)	$	46,846

The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 43% and 44% of the assets’ original cost at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. There were no operating leases in non-accrual status as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Direct financing leases:

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had no investment in direct financing leases, as its remaining finance lease matured on January 1, 2015. As of December 31, 2014, such investment consists of research equipment with minimum lease payments totaling $13 thousand.

At March 31, 2015, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):

	Operating Leases
Nine months ending December 31, 2015	$	7,152
Year ending December 31, 2016		7,003
2017		4,911
2018		4,344
2019		1,654
2020		283
Thereafter		402
	$	25,749

16

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

The useful lives for each category of leases is reviewed at a minimum of once per quarter. As of March 31, 2015, the respective useful lives of each category of lease assets in the Company’s portfolio are as follows (in years):

Equipment category	Useful Life
Coal terminal		50 – 60
Transportation, rail		35 – 40
Marine vessel		20 – 30
Aviation		15 – 20
Manufacturing		10 – 15
Agriculture		7 – 10
Cleaning & maintenance		7 – 10
Construction		7 – 10
Food processing		7 – 10
Materials handling		7 – 10
Transportation		7 – 10
Research		5 – 7
Computer		3 – 5

6. Related party transactions:

The terms of the Operating Agreement provide that the Managing Member and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment management and resale and for management of the Company.

The Operating Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by the Managing Member and/or affiliates for providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and equipment financing documentation. The Managing Member is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of investments.

Each of AFS and ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group and performs services for the Company on behalf of the Managing Member. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications and general administrative services are performed by AFS.

Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member or its affiliates are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred. The Managing Member believes that the costs reimbursed are the lower of (i) actual costs incurred on behalf of the Company or (ii) the amount the Company would be required to pay independent parties for comparable administrative services in the same geographic location.

17

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

6. Related party transactions: - (continued)

During the respective three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Managing Member and/or affiliates earned fees and billed for reimbursements of costs and expenses pursuant to the Operating Agreement as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
Administrative costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates	$	374	$	309
Asset management fees to Managing Member		140		124
Acquisition and initial direct costs paid to Managing Member		1		344
	$	515	$	777

7. Non-recourse debt:

At March 31, 2015, non-recourse debt consists of notes payable to financial institutions. The note payments are due in monthly installments. Interest on the notes range from 1.89% to 3.66% per annum. The notes are secured by assignments of lease payments and pledges of assets. At March 31, 2015, gross operating lease rentals and future payments on direct financing leases totaled approximately $18.7 million over the remaining lease terms; and the carrying value of the pledged assets is $33.3 million. The notes mature from 2015 through 2020.

The non-recourse debt does not contain any material financial covenants. The debt is secured by a lien granted by the Company to the non-recourse lenders on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lenders have recourse only to the following collateral: the specific leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items. The non-recourse obligation is payable solely out of the respective specific security and the Company does not guarantee (nor is the Company otherwise contractually responsible for) the payment of the non-recourse debt as a general obligation or liability of the Company. Although the Company does not have any direct or general liability in connection with the non-recourse debt apart from the security granted, the Company is directly and generally liable and responsible for certain representations, warranties, and covenants made to the lenders, such as warranties as to genuineness of the transaction parties' signatures, as to the genuineness of the respective lease chattel paper or the transaction as a whole, or as to the Company's good title to or perfected interest in the secured collateral, as well as similar representations, warranties and covenants typically provided by non-recourse borrowers and customary in the equipment finance industry, and are viewed by such industry as being consistent with non-recourse discount financing obligations. Accordingly, as there are no financial covenants or ratios imposed on the Company in connection with the non-recourse debt, the Company has determined that there are no material covenants with respect to the non-recourse debt that warrant footnote disclosure.

Future minimum payments of non-recourse debt are as follows (in thousands):

	Principal		Interest		Total
Nine months ending December 31, 2015	$	4,346	$	346	$	4,692
Year ending December 31, 2016		5,030		327		5,357
2017		3,655		200		3,855
2018		3,486		94		3,580
2019		1,146		16		1,162
2020		45		—		45
	$	17,708	$	983	$	18,691

18

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

8. Long-term debt:

As of March 31, 2015, the $2.1 million of long-term debt consists of a note payable to a lender. Such debt was utilized during the fourth quarter of 2013 to partially fund the marine vessel and related bareboat charter purchased by the Fund and its affiliate, ATEL 14, LLC. The note bears interest at a fixed-rate of 3.5% per annum, to accrue in arrears on a monthly basis. The full pro rata principal amount of $2.1 million plus all outstanding accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $400 thousand shall be paid in one payment of $2.5 million due on May 25, 2019. The note is recourse to the residual value of the vessel which is expected to be well in excess of the note amount. In addition, the lender has recourse to the Fund’s general assets up to $2.5 million. The note does not contain any material financial covenants and is guaranteed as a senior obligation of the Fund.

9. Borrowing facilities:

Effective May 25, 2012, the Company participates with AFS and certain of its affiliates in a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions. The Credit Facility is comprised of a working capital facility to AFS, an acquisition facility (the “Acquisition Facility”) and a warehouse facility (the “Warehouse Facility”) to AFS, the Company and affiliates, and a venture facility available to an affiliate. The Credit Facility was for an amount up to $60 million and set to expire in June 2014. During January 2014, the line was increased to $75 million, an affiliated participant added, and the expiration extended to June 2015. The lending syndicate providing the Credit Facility has a blanket lien on all of the Company’s assets as collateral for any and all borrowings under the Acquisition Facility, and on a pro-rata basis under the Warehouse Facility. Such Credit Facility includes certain financial covenants.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, borrowings under the Credit Facility were as follows (in thousands):

	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Total available under the financing arrangement	$	75,000		$	75,000
Amount borrowed by the Company under the acquisition facility		—			—
Amounts borrowed by affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies under the working capital, acquisition and warehouse facilities		(1,135	)		(1,150	)
Total remaining available under the working capital, acquisition and warehouse facilities	$	73,865		$	73,850

The Company and its affiliates pay an annual commitment fee to have access to this line of credit. As of March 31, 2015, the aggregate amount of the Credit Facility is potentially available to the Company, subject to certain sub-facility and borrowing-base limitations. However, as amounts are drawn on the Credit Facility by each of the Company and the affiliates who are borrowers under the Credit Facility, the amount remaining available to all borrowers to draw under the Credit Facility is reduced. As the Warehousing Facility is a short term bridge facility, any amounts borrowed under the Warehousing Facility, and then repaid by the affiliated borrowers (including the Company) upon allocation of an acquisition to a specific purchaser, become available under the Warehouse Facility for further short term borrowing.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company’s Tangible Net Worth requirement under the Credit Facility was $10.0 million, the permitted maximum leverage ratio was not to exceed 1.25 to 1, and the required minimum interest coverage ratio was not to be less than 2 to 1. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants under the Credit Facility with a minimum Tangible Net Worth, leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio, as calculated per the Credit Facility agreement of $38.5 million, 0.51 to 1, and 17.50 to 1, respectively,

19

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

9. Borrowing facilities: - (continued)

as of March 31, 2015. As such, as of March 31, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all material financial covenants, and with all other material conditions of the Credit Facility. The Company does not anticipate any covenant violations nor does it anticipate that any of these covenants will restrict its operations or its ability to procure additional financing.

Fee and interest terms

The interest rate on the Credit Facility is based on either the LIBOR/Eurocurrency rate of 1-, 2-, 3- or 6-month maturity plus a lender designated spread, or the bank’s Prime rate, which re-prices daily. Principal amounts of loans made under the Credit Facility that are prepaid may be re-borrowed on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth under the Credit Facility. Since the effective date of its participation in the Credit Facility (May 25, 2012) through March 31, 2015, the Company has had no borrowings under the Credit Facility.

Warehouse facility

To hold the assets under the Warehousing Facility prior to allocation to specific investor programs, a Warehousing Trust has been entered into by the Company, AFS, ALC, and certain of the affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies. The Warehousing Trust is used by the Warehouse Facility borrowers to acquire and hold, on a short-term basis, certain lease transactions that meet the investment objectives of each of such entities. Each of the leasing programs sponsored by AFS and ALC is a pro rata participant in the Warehousing Trust, as described below. When a program no longer has a need for short term financing provided by the Warehousing Facility, it is removed from participation, and as new leasing investment entities are formed by AFS and ALC and commence their acquisition stages, these new entities are added.

As of March 31, 2015, the investment program participants were ATEL 14, LLC, the Company and ATEL 16, LLC. During the first quarter of 2015, ATEL 12, LLC was removed as a participant of the Credit Facility. Pursuant to the Warehousing Trust, the benefit of the lease transaction assets, and the corresponding liabilities under the Warehouse Facility, inure to each of such entities based upon each entity’s pro-rata share in the Warehousing Trust estate. The “pro-rata share” is calculated as a ratio of the net worth of each entity over the aggregate net worth of all entities benefiting from the Warehousing Trust estate, excepting that the trustees, AFS and ALC, are both jointly and severally liable for the pro rata portion of the obligations of each of the affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies participating under the Warehouse Facility. Transactions are financed through this Warehouse Facility only until the transactions are allocated to a specific program for purchase or are otherwise disposed by AFS and ALC. When a determination is made to allocate the transaction to a specific program for purchase by the program, the purchaser repays the debt associated with the asset, either with cash or by means of proceeds of a draw under the Acquisition Facility, and the asset is removed from the Warehouse Facility collateral, and ownership of the asset and any debt obligation associated with the asset are assumed solely by the purchasing entity.

There were no borrowings under the Warehouse Facility as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

10. Commitments:

At March 31, 2015, there were commitments to fund an approximate $650 thousand of investments in notes receivable and purchase an additional $461 thousand of lease assets. These amounts represent contract awards which may be canceled by the prospective borrower/investee or may not be accepted by the Company.

20

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

11. Guarantees:

The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, based upon the Manager’s experience, there have not been any prior claims or losses pursuant to these types of contracts and the expectation of risk of loss is remote.

The Managing Member knows of no facts or circumstances that would make the Company’s contractual commitments outside standard mutual covenants applicable to commercial transactions between businesses. Accordingly, the Company believes that these indemnification obligations are made in the ordinary course of business as part of standard commercial and industry practice, and that any potential liability under the Company’s similar commitments is remote. Should any such indemnification obligation become payable, the Company would separately record and/or disclose such liability in accordance with GAAP.

12. Members’ Capital:

A total of 6,615,221 Units were issued and outstanding at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, including the 50 Units issued to the initial Member (Managing Member). The Fund was authorized to issue up to 15,000,000 Units in addition to the Units issued to the initial Member.

The Company has the right, exercisable in the Manager’s discretion, but not the obligation, to repurchase Units of a Unitholder who ceases to be a U.S. Citizen, for a price equal to 100% of the holder’s capital account. The Company is otherwise permitted, but not required, to repurchase Units upon a holder’s request. The repurchase of Fund Units is made in accordance with Section 13 of the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement. The repurchase would be at the discretion of the Manager on terms it determines to be appropriate under given circumstances, in the event that the Manager deems such repurchase to be in the best interest of the Company; provided, the Company is never required to repurchase any Units. Upon the repurchase of any Units by the Fund, the tendered Units are cancelled. Units repurchased in prior periods were repurchased at amounts representing the original investment less cumulative distributions made to the Unitholder with respect to the Units. All Units repurchased during a quarter are deemed to be repurchased effective the last day of the preceding quarter, and are not deemed to be outstanding during, or entitled to allocations of net income, net loss or distributions for the quarter in which such repurchase occurs.

The Fund’s net income or net losses are to be allocated 100% to the Members. From the commencement of the Fund until the initial closing date, net income and net loss shall be allocated 99% to the Managing Member and 1% to the initial Other Members. Commencing with the initial closing date, net income and net loss shall be allocated 92.5% to the Other Members and 7.5% to the Managing Member. In accordance with the terms of the Operating Agreement, an additional allocation of income was made to the Manager during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. The amount allocated was determined to bring the Manager’s ending capital account balance to zero at the end of the period.

Fund distributions are to be allocated 7.5% to the Managing Member and 92.5% to the Other Members. The Company commenced periodic distributions, based on cash flows from operations, during the first quarter of 2012.

Distributions to the Other Members for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
Distributions declared	$	1,488	$	1,490
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		6,615,221		6,620,971
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	0.22	$	0.23

21

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

13. Fair value measurements:

Fair value measurements and disclosures are based on a fair value hierarchy as determined by significant inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs within the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in the market.

Level 3 – Valuation is modeled using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. These unobservable inputs reflect the Company's own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, only the Company’s warrants were measured on a recurring basis. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company recorded non-recurring adjustments to reflect the fair values of certain impaired notes receivable. The Company had not recorded any nonrecurring fair value adjustments prior to the first quarter of 2015.

The Company’s valuation policy is determined by members of the Asset Management, Credit and Accounting departments. Whenever possible, the policy is to obtain quoted market prices in active markets to estimate fair values for recognition and disclosure purposes. Where quoted market prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, broker quotes, information from third party remarketing agents, third party appraisals of collateral and/or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by certain of the Company’s assumptions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Potential taxes and other transaction costs are not considered in estimating fair values. As the Company is responsible for determining fair value, an analysis is performed on prices obtained from third parties. Such analysis is performed by asset management and credit department personnel who are familiar with the Company’s investments in equipment, notes receivable and equity securities of venture companies. The analysis may include a periodic review of price fluctuations and validation of numbers obtained from a specific third party by reference to multiple representative sources.

The measurement methodology is as follows:

Warrants (recurring)

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried on the balance sheet at an estimated fair value at the end of the period. The valuation of the warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes formulation of value based upon the stock price(s), the exercise price(s), the volatility of comparable venture companies, and a risk free interest rate for the term(s) of the warrant exercise(s). The calculated fair value of the Fund’s warrant portfolio approximated $848 thousand at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Such valuations are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s Level 3 recurring assets (in thousands):

	Level 3 Assets
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	848
Unrealized gain on warrants, net recorded during the period		—
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	848

22

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

13. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

Impaired notes receivable

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable, when impairment adjustments are required, is estimated using either third party appraisals or estimations of the value of collateral (for collateral dependent loans) or discounted cash flow analyses (by discounting estimated future cash flows) using the effective interest rate contained in the terms of the original loan. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company had recorded fair value adjustments totaling $27 thousand relative to two impaired notes. The Company had no fair value adjustments relative to impaired notes receivable during prior year period and the subsequent last three quarters of 2014.

The fair value adjustments recorded during the current year period were non-recurring and were based upon an estimated valuation of underlying collateral. Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair value of the impaired notes receivable is classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The valuation utilizes a market approach technique and uses inputs from third party appraisers that utilize current market transactions as adjusted for certain factors specific to the underlying collateral.

The following table presents the fair value measurement of impaired assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at March 31, 2015 (in thousands):

	March 31, 2015		Level 1 Estimated Fair Value		Level 2 Estimated Fair Value		Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Impaired notes receivable, net	$	62	$	—	$	—	$	62

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and related notes.

The Company has determined the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that it considers appropriate and consistent with the fair value accounting guidance. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize or has realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The following tables summarize the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s recurring and nonrecurring fair value calculation categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

March 31, 2015
Name	Valuation Frequency		Valuation Technique		Unobservable Inputs		Range of Input Values
Warrants		Recurring		Black-Scholes formulation		Stock price		$0.05 – $1,000.00
						Exercise price		$0.05 – $1,000.00
						Time to maturity (in years)		1.37 – 6.74
						Risk-free interest rate		0.36% – 1.67%
						Annualized volatility		25.37% – 100.00%
Notes Receivable		Non-recurring		Market Approach		Third Party Agents' estimate of   the value of collateral		$4,900 – $52,500
						Condition of collateral   (equipment)		Poor to Average

23

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

13. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

December 31, 2014
Name	Valuation Frequency		Valuation Technique		Unobservable Inputs		Range of Input Values
Warrants		Recurring		Black-Scholes formulation		Stock price		$0.05 – $1,000.00
						Exercise price		$0.05 – $1,000.00
						Time to maturity (in years)		1.62 – 6.98
						Risk-free interest rate		0.50% – 1.97%
						Annualized volatility		25.67% – 100.00%

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and related notes.

The Company has determined the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that it considers appropriate and consistent with the fair value accounting guidance. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize or has realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash and cash equivalents

The recorded amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments.

Notes receivable

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable is generally estimated based upon various methodologies deployed by financial and credit management including, but not limited to, credit analysis, third party appraisal and/or discounted cash flow analysis based upon current market valuation techniques and market rates for similar types of lending arrangements, which may consider adjustments for impaired loans as deemed necessary.

Investment in securities

The Company’s investment securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at cost which management believes approximates fair value, as appropriately adjusted for impairment.

Non-recourse and Long-term debt

The fair value of the Company’s non-recourse debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based upon current market borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Commitments and Contingencies

Management has determined that no recognition for the fair value of the Company’s loan commitments is necessary because their terms are made on a market rate basis and require borrowers to be in compliance with the Company’s credit requirements at the time of funding.

The fair value of contingent liabilities (or guarantees) is not considered material because management believes there has been no event that has occurred wherein a guarantee liability has been incurred or will likely be incurred.

24

ATEL 15, LLC
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

13. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

The following tables present estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

	March 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,482	$	7,482	$	—	$	—	$	7,482
Notes receivable, net		3,227		—		—		3,227		3,227
Investment in securities		125		—		—		125		125
Fair value of warrants		848		—		—		848		848
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		17,708		—		—		17,862		17,862
Long-term debt		2,068		—		—		2,217		2,217

	December 31, 2014
	Carrying Amount			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,214		$	7,214	$	—	$	—	$	7,214
Notes receivable, net		3,786			—		—		3,786		3,786
Investment in securities		125	��		—		—		125		125
Fair value of warrants		848			—		—		848		848
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		17,362			—		—		17,428		17,428
Long-term debt		2,068			—		—		2,170		2,170

25

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Statements contained in this Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”) and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, economic recession and changes in general economic conditions, including fluctuations in demand for equipment, lease rates, and interest rates, may result in delays in investment and reinvestment, delays in leasing, re-leasing, and disposition of equipment, and reduced returns on invested capital. The Company’s performance is subject to risks relating to lessee and borrower defaults and the creditworthiness of its lessees and borrowers. The Company’s performance is also subject to risks relating to the value of its equipment at the end of its leases, which may be affected by the condition of the equipment, technological obsolescence and the markets for new and used equipment at the end of lease terms. Investors are cautioned not to attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

Overview

ATEL 15, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on March 4, 2011 for the purpose of raising capital and originating equipment financing transactions and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. The offering of the Fund was granted effectiveness by the Securities and Exchange Commission as of October 28, 2011.

The Company conducted a public offering of 15,000,000 Limited Liability Company Units (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. As of December 21, 2011, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, representing $1.2 million), excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors, had been received and the Fund requested subscription proceeds to be released from escrow. On that date, the Company commenced initial operations and continued in its development stage activities until transitioning to an operating enterprise during the first quarter of 2012. Pennsylvania subscriptions are subject to a separate escrow and are released to the Fund only when aggregate subscriptions for all investors equal to not less than $7.5 million. Total contributions to the Fund exceeded $7.5 million on April 4, 2012, at which time a request was processed to release the Pennsylvania escrowed amounts. The offering was terminated on October 28, 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, cumulative contributions of $66.5 million (inclusive of the $500 initial Member’s capital investment), representing 6,653,171 Units, have been received. Through the same date, a net total of $283 thousand of such contributions (representing 37,950 Units) have been rescinded or repurchased (net of distributions paid and allocated syndication costs) by the Company. As of March 31, 2015, 6,615,221 Units were issued and outstanding.

Results of Operations

The three months ended March 31, 2015 versus the three months ended March 31, 2014

The Company had net losses of $180 thousand and $663 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Results for the first quarter of 2015 reflect an increase in total revenues and a decrease in total expenses when compared to the prior year period.

Revenues

Total revenues for the first quarter of 2015 increased by $324 thousand, or 14%, as compared to the prior year period. The growth in total revenues was largely due to an increase in operating lease revenues and the absence of unrealized losses on fair valuation of warrants during the current year period.

The increase in operating lease revenues totaled $177 thousand and was attributable to additional revenue from an approximate $7.6 million of operating lease assets acquired since March 31, 2014. The absence of unrealized losses during the current year period increased total revenues by $140 thousand when compared to the prior year period. Such amount was recorded as unrealized losses during the prior year period relative to the revaluation of certain warrant positions in the Fund’s portfolio.

26

Expenses

Total expenses for the first quarter of 2015 decreased by $159 thousand, or 5%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decrease in expenses was primarily the result of a reduction in acquisition expense partially offset by increases in costs reimbursed to the Manager and/or affiliates and provision for credit losses.

The decrease in acquisition expense totaled $275 thousand and was largely due to the reassignment of such costs to certain affiliate leasing activities coupled with a period over period decline in lease acquisition activities.

Partially offsetting the aforementioned decrease in expenses were increases in costs reimbursed to the Manager and/or affiliates and provision for credit losses totaling $65 thousand and $27 thousand, respectively. The increase in costs reimbursed to the Manager and/or affiliates was a result of an increase in allocated costs consistent with the Fund’s expanded operations; and, the increase in provision for credit losses was attributable to first quarter 2015 fair value adjustments relative to certain impaired notes receivable. There were no such fair value adjustments during the prior year period.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $7.5 million and $7.2 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The liquidity of the Company will vary in the future, increasing to the extent cash flows from leases and proceeds of asset sales exceed expenses and decreasing as lease assets are acquired, as distributions are made to the Members and to the extent expenses exceed cash flows from leases and proceeds from asset sales.

If inflation in the general economy becomes significant, it may affect the Company in as much as the residual (resale) values and rates on re-leases of the Company’s leased assets may increase as the costs of similar assets increase. However, the Company’s revenues from existing leases and notes would not increase as such rates are generally fixed for the terms of the leases and notes without adjustment for inflation. In addition, if interest rates increase significantly under such circumstances, the rates that the Company can obtain on future lease or financing transactions will be expected to increase as the cost of capital is a significant factor in the pricing of leases and investments in notes receivable. Leases and notes already in place, for the most part, would not be affected by changes in interest rates.

The Company currently believes it has available adequate reserves to meet its immediate cash requirements and those of the next twelve months, but in the event those reserves were found to be inadequate, the Company would likely be in a position to borrow against its current portfolio to meet such requirements. The Managing Member envisions no such requirements for operating purposes.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth summary cash flow data (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	1,301		$	827
Investing activities		232			(214	)
Financing activities		(1,265	)		(2,515	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	268		$	(1,902	)

27

The three months ended March 31, 2015 versus the three months ended March 31, 2014

During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company’s primary source of liquidity was cash flow from its portfolio of operating and direct financing lease contracts, and its investments in notes receivable. In addition, the Company utilized borrowings of $1.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015, and realized $101 thousand and $596 thousand of proceeds from the sale of lease assets and early termination of certain notes, and the disposition of investment securities during the respective three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

During the respective three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, cash was primarily used to pay down debt totaling $1.2 million and $908 thousand; and, to pay distributions to both Other Members and the Managing Member totaling $1.6 million for each period. Cash was also used to acquire lease assets totaling $355 thousand and $1.4 million during the same respective periods.

Revolving credit facility

Effective May 25, 2012, the Company participated with AFS and certain of its affiliates in a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions. The Credit Facility is comprised of a working capital facility to AFS, an acquisition facility (the “Acquisition Facility”) and a warehouse facility (the “Warehouse Facility”) to AFS, the Company and affiliates, and a venture facility available to an affiliate. Such Credit Facility was for an amount up to $60 million and set to expire in June 2014. During January 2014, the line was increased to $75 million, an affiliated participant added, and expiration extended to June 2015.

Compliance with covenants

The Credit Facility includes certain financial and non-financial covenants applicable to each borrower, including the Company. Such covenants include covenants typically found in credit facilities of the size and nature of the Credit Facility, such as accuracy of representations, good standing, absence of liens and material litigation, etc. The Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Credit Facility as of March 31, 2015. The Company considers certain financial covenants to be material to its ongoing use of the Credit Facility and these covenants are described below.

Material financial covenants

Under the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain a specific tangible net worth, to comply with a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio, and to comply with other terms expressed in the Credit Facility, including limitation on the incurrence of additional debt and guaranties, defaults, and delinquencies.

As of March 31, 2015, the material financial covenants are summarized as follows:

Minimum Tangible Net Worth: $10.0 million
Leverage Ratio (leverage to Tangible Net Worth): Not to exceed 1.25 to 1
Collateral Value: Collateral value under the Warehouse Facility must be no less than the outstanding borrowings under that facility
EBITDA to Interest Ratio: Not to be less than 2 to 1 for the four fiscal quarters just ended

“EBITDA” is defined under the Credit Facility as, for the relevant period of time (1) gross revenues (all payments from leases and notes receivable) for such period minus (2) expenses deducted in determining net income for such period plus (3) to the extent deducted in determining net income for such period (a) provision for income taxes and (b) interest expense, and (c) depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges. Extraordinary items and gains or losses on (and proceeds from) sales or dispositions of assets outside of the ordinary course of business are excluded in the calculation of EBITDA. “Tangible Net Worth” is defined as, as of the date of determination, (i) the net worth of the Company, after deducting therefrom (without duplication of deductions) the net book amount of all assets of the Company, after deducting any reserves and other amounts for assets which would be treated as intangibles under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), and after certain other adjustments permitted under the agreements.

28

The financial covenants referred to above are applicable to the Company only to the extent that the Company has borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants under the Credit Facility with a minimum Tangible Net Worth, leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio, as calculated per the Credit Facility agreement of $38.5 million, 0.51 to 1, and 17.50 to 1, respectively, as of March 31, 2015. As such, as of March 31, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all such material financial covenants.

Reconciliation to GAAP of EBITDA

For purposes of compliance with the Credit Facility covenants, the Company uses a financial calculation of EBITDA, as defined therein, which is a non-GAAP financial performance measure. The EBITDA is utilized by the Company to calculate its debt covenant ratios.

As previously discussed, the Fund became a party to the Credit Facility effective May 25, 2012. The following is a reconciliation of net loss to EBITDA, as defined in the loan agreement, for the twelve months ended March 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Net loss – GAAP basis	$	(441	)
Interest expense		576
Depreciation and amortization		8,029
Amortization of initial direct costs		102
Provision for credit losses		28
Unrealized gain on fair valuation of warrants		(204	)
Principal payments received on direct financing leases		41
Principal payments received on notes receivable		1,947
EBITDA (for Credit Facility financial covenant calculation only)	$	10,078

Events of default, cross-defaults, recourse and security

The terms of the Credit Facility include standard events of default by the Company which, if not cured within applicable grace periods, could give lenders remedies against the Company, including the acceleration of all outstanding borrowings and a demand for repayment in advance of their stated maturity. If a breach of any material term of the Credit Facility should occur, the lenders may, at their option, increase borrowing rates, accelerate the obligations in advance of their stated maturities, terminate the facility, and exercise rights of collection available to them under the express terms of the facility, or by operation of law. The lenders also retain the discretion to waive a violation of any covenant at the Company’s request.

The Company is currently in compliance with its obligations under the Credit Facility. In the event of a technical default (e.g., the failure to timely file a required report, or a one-time breach of a financial covenant), the Company believes it has ample time to request and be granted a waiver by the lenders, or, alternatively, cure the default under the existing provisions of its debt agreements, including, if necessary, arranging for additional capital from alternate sources to satisfy outstanding obligations.

The lending syndicate providing the Credit Facility has a blanket lien on all of the Company’s assets as collateral for any and all borrowings under the Acquisition Facility, and on a pro-rata basis under the Warehouse Facility.

The Acquisition Facility is generally recourse solely to the Company, and is not cross-defaulted to any other obligations of affiliated companies under the Credit Facility, except as described in this paragraph. The Credit Facility is cross-defaulted to a default in the payment of any debt (other than non-recourse debt) or any other agreement or condition beyond the period of grace (not exceeding 30 days), the effect of which would entitle the lender under such agreement to accelerate the obligations prior to their stated maturity in an individual or aggregate principal amount in excess of 15% of the Company’s consolidated Tangible Net Worth. Also, a bankruptcy of AFS will trigger a default for the Company under the Credit Facility.

29

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had non-recourse long-term debt totaling $17.7 million and $17.4 million, respectively. Such non-recourse notes payable do not contain any material financial covenants. The notes are secured by a specific lien granted by the Company to the non-recourse lenders on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lenders have recourse only to the following collateral: the specific leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items.

For detailed information on the Company’s debt obligations, see Notes 7 through 9 to the financial statements as set forth in Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Long-Term Debt

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had long-term debt totaling $2.1 million. The debt was utilized during the fourth quarter of 2013 to partially fund the marine vessel and related bareboat charter purchased by the Fund and its affiliate, ATEL 14, LLC. The full pro rata principal amount of $2.1 million plus all outstanding accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $400 thousand shall be paid in one payment of $2.5 million due on May 25, 2019. The note is recourse to the residual value of the vessel which is expected to be well in excess of the note amount. In addition, the lender has recourse to the Fund’s general assets up to $2.5 million. The note does not contain any material financial covenants and is guaranteed as a senior obligation of the Fund.

Distributions

The Unitholders of record are entitled to certain distributions as provided under the Operating Agreement. The Company commenced periodic distributions beginning with the month of January 2012. Additional distributions have been made consistently through March 2015.

Cash distributions were made by the Fund to Unitholders of record as of February 28, 2015 and paid through March 31, 2015. Distributions may be characterized for tax, accounting and economic purposes as a return of capital, a return on capital (including escrow interest) or a portion of each. Generally, the portion of each cash distribution by a company which exceeds its net income for the fiscal period would constitute a return of capital. The Fund is required by the terms of its Operating Agreement to distribute the net cash flow generated by its investments in certain minimum amounts during the Reinvestment Period before it can reinvest its operating cash flow in additional portfolio assets. See the discussion in the Prospectus under “Income, Losses and Distributions — Reinvestment.” Accordingly, the amount of cash flow from Fund investments distributed to Unitholders will not be available for reinvestment in additional portfolio assets.

The cash distributions were based on current and anticipated gross revenues from the leases and loans acquired. During the Fund's acquisition and operating stages, the Fund may incur short term borrowing to fund regular distributions of such gross revenues to be generated by newly acquired transactions during their respective initial fixed terms. As such, all Fund periodic cash distributions made during these stages have been, and are expected in the future to be, based on the Fund's actual and anticipated gross revenues to be generated from the binding initial terms of the leases and loans acquired.

30

The following table summarizes distribution activity for the Fund from inception through March 31, 2015 (in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data):

Distribution Period(1)	Paid		Return of Capital					Distribution of Income					Total Distribution					Total Distribution per Unit(2)		Weighted Average Units Outstanding(3)
Monthly and quarterly distributions
Oct 2011 – Dec 2011 (Distribution of escrow interest)		Feb 2012 –  Jun 2012	$	—				$	—				$	—					n/a		n/a
Jan 2012 – Nov 2012		Feb 2012 –  Dec 2012		1,173					—					1,173					0.79		1,476,249
Dec 2012 – Nov 2013		Jan 2013 –  Dec 2013		4,191					—					4,191					0.88		4,758,784
Dec 2013 – Nov 2014		Jan 2014 –  Dec 2014		5,952					—					5,952					0.90		6,620,862
Dec 2014 – Feb 2015		Jan 2015 –  Mar 2015		1,490					—					1,490					0.23		6,615,221
			$	12,806				$	—				$	12,806				$	2.80
Source of distributions
Lease and loan payments and sales proceeds received			$	12,806		100.00	%	$	—		0.00	%	$	12,806		100.00	%
Interest Income				—		0.00	%		—		0.00	%		—		0.00	%
Debt against non-cancellable firm term payments on leases and loans				—		0.00	%		—		0.00	%		—		0.00	%
			$	12,806		100.00	%	$	—		0.00	%	$	12,806		100.00	%

(1) Investors may elect to receive their distributions either monthly or quarterly (See “Timing and Method of Distributions” on Page 67 of the Prospectus).

(2) Total distributions per Unit represents the per Unit distribution rate for those units which were outstanding for all of the applicable period.

(3) Balances shown represent weighted average units for the period from January 1, 2012 to November 30, 2012, December 1, 2012 to November 30, 2013, December 1, 2013 to November 30, 2014 and December 1, 2014 to February 2015, respectively.

Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Commitments and Contingencies

At March 31, 2015, there were commitments to fund an approximate $650 thousand of investments in notes receivable and purchase an additional $461 thousand of lease assets. These amounts represent contract awards which may be canceled by the prospective borrower/investee or may not be accepted by the Company.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

None.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized

31

as of the date of adoption. The Company evaluated the impact of the new standard on its financial statements and has determined that such impact is virtually non-existent as the new revenue guideline does not affect revenues from leases and loans, which comprise the majority of the Company’s revenues.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The new standard provides guidance relative to management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, which are based upon historical experiences, market trends and financial forecasts, and upon various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances and at that certain point in time. Actual results may differ, significantly at times, from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company’s critical accounting policies are described in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. There have been no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies since December 31, 2014.

Item 4. Controls and procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The Company’s Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer (“Management”), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Company does not control the financial reporting process, and is solely dependent on the Management of the Managing Member, who is responsible for providing the Company with financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Managing Member’s disclosure controls and procedures, as they are applicable to the Company, means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78aet seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal control

There were no changes in the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company.

32

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

In the ordinary course of conducting business, there may be certain claims, suits, and complaints filed against the Managing Member. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such matters, if any, will not have a material impact on the Managing Member’s financial position or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

(a) Documents filed as a part of this report

1. Financial Statement Schedules

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.

2. Other Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Dean L. Cash
31.2	Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi
32.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Dean L. Cash
32.2	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Paritosh K. Choksi
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

33

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 14, 2015

ATEL 15, LLC
(Registrant)

By: ATEL Managing Member, LLC
Managing Member of Registrant

By: /s/ Dean L. Cash

Dean L. Cash
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of
ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)

By: /s/ Paritosh K. Choksi

Paritosh K. Choksi
Director, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of
ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)

By: /s/ Samuel Schussler

Samuel Schussler
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of
ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)