SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ' |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
Properties |
|
Acquisition accounting was applied to real estate assets within the Rouse portfolio either when GGP emerged from bankruptcy in November 2010 or upon any subsequent acquisition. After acquisition accounting is applied, the real estate assets are carried at the cost basis less accumulated depreciation. Real estate taxes and interest costs incurred during development periods are capitalized. Capitalized interest costs are based on qualified expenditures and interest rates in place during the development period. Capitalized real estate taxes, interest and interest related costs are amortized over lives which are consistent with the developed assets. |
|
Pre-development costs, which generally include legal and professional fees and other directly-related third party costs, are capitalized as part of the property being developed. In the event a development is no longer deemed to be probable, the costs previously capitalized are expensed. |
|
Tenant improvements, either paid directly or in the form of construction allowances paid to tenants, are capitalized and depreciated over the shorter of the useful life or applicable lease term. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed when incurred. Expenditures for significant betterments and improvements are capitalized. In leasing tenant space, the Company may provide funding to the lessee through a tenant allowance. In accounting for a tenant allowance, the Company determines whether the allowance represents funding for the construction of leasehold improvements and evaluates the ownership of such improvements. If the Company is considered the owner of the leasehold improvements for accounting purposes, it capitalizes the amount of the tenant allowance and depreciates it over the shorter of the useful life of the leasehold improvements or the related lease term. If the tenant allowance represents a payment for a purpose other than funding leasehold improvements, or in the event that the Company is not considered the owner of the improvements for accounting purposes, the allowance is capitalized as a lease incentive and is recognized over the lease term as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis. |
|
Depreciation or amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method based upon the following estimated useful lives: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Buildings and improvements | 40 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equipment and fixtures | 10-May | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tenant improvements | Shorter of useful life or applicable lease term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Impairment |
|
Operating properties and intangible assets |
|
Accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets require that if impairment indicators exist and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset are less than its carrying amount, an impairment provision should be recorded to write down the carrying amount of such asset to its fair value. The Company reviews all real estate assets for potential impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators are assessed separately for each property and include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in real estate property net operating income and occupancy percentages, high loan to value ratios, and carrying values in excess of the fair values. Impairment indicators for pre-development costs, which are typically costs incurred during the beginning stages of a potential development and developments in progress, are assessed by project and include, but are not limited to, significant changes to the Company’s plans with respect to the project, significant changes in projected completion dates, revenues or cash flows, development costs, market factors and sustainability of development projects. |
|
If an indicator of potential impairment exists, the asset is tested for recoverability by comparing its carrying amount to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. The cash flow estimates used both for determining recoverability and estimating fair value are inherently judgmental and reflect current and projected trends in rental, occupancy, capitalization rates, and estimated holding periods for the applicable assets. Although the estimated fair value of certain assets may exceed the carrying amount, a real estate asset is only considered to be impaired when its carrying amount cannot be recovered through estimated future undiscounted cash flows. To the extent an impairment provision is determined to be necessary, the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value is expensed to operations. In addition, the impairment provision is allocated proportionately to adjust the carrying amount of the asset group. The adjusted carrying amount, which represents the new cost basis of the asset, is depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company determined there were events and circumstances which changed management's estimated holding period for The Boulevard Mall and The Steeplegate Mall. |
|
During 2013, the servicer of the loan for The Boulevard Mall placed the loan into special servicing status and communicated to the Company that they would be unwilling to extend the term and discount the loan. As a result of this and the continued decline in operating results of the property, management concluded that it was in the best interest of the Company to convey the property to the lender. As the Company intended on conveying the property to the lender during 2013, the Company revised its intended hold period of this property to less than one year. The change in the hold period adjusted the undiscounted cash flows utilized in the impairment analysis and the Company concluded that the property was not recoverable. The Company recorded an impairment charge on the property of $21.7 million during the first quarter of 2013, as the aggregate carrying value was higher than the fair value of the property. This impairment charge is included in Loss from discontinued operations on the Company's consolidated and combined statements of operations. |
|
In June 2013, the Company conveyed its interest in The Boulevard Mall to the lender, which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $14.0 million, which is recorded in Discontinued operations, net, on the Company's consolidated and combined statements of operations (see Note 7). |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company was unable to advance prospective leases at The Steeplegate Mall, which changed management's intended holding period of this asset. Furthermore, the mortgage debt on this asset is due in August 2014 and without having advanced the prospective leasing, the Company does not anticipate funding additional capital for this asset. Without funding additional capital to reduce the mortgage debt to a lower loan to value ratio the Company may not be able to refinance the loan. Management determined that the carrying value of the property was not recoverable and therefore required an impairment charge. This impairment charge is included in the Provision for impairment on the Company's consolidated and combined statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $15.2 million as the aggregate carrying value was higher than the fair value of the property. |
|
No impairment charges were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. |
|
Acquisitions of Operating Properties |
|
Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the acquisition method of accounting. Estimates of future cash flows and other valuation techniques were used to allocate the purchase price between land, buildings and improvements, equipment, debt, liabilities assumed and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities such as amounts related to in-place tenant leases, acquired above and below-market tenant and ground leases and tenant relationships. No significant value had been ascribed to tenant relationships of the acquired properties in 2013 (see Note 3). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets and Liabilities |
|
The following table summarizes our intangible assets and liabilities as a result of the application of acquisition accounting: |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross Asset | | Accumulated | | Net Carrying | | | | | |
(Liability) | (Amortization)/ | Amount | | | | | |
| Accretion | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | | | | |
31-Dec-13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Tenant leases: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
In-place value | $ | 100,125 | | | $ | (37,888 | ) | | $ | 62,237 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Above-market | 132,986 | | | (64,303 | ) | | 68,683 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Below-market | (59,641 | ) | | 19,394 | | | (40,247 | ) | | | | | |
| | | | |
Ground leases: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Below-market | 2,173 | | | (392 | ) | | 1,781 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
31-Dec-12 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Tenant leases: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
In-place value | $ | 97,887 | | | $ | (39,681 | ) | | $ | 58,206 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Above-market | 151,936 | | | (62,529 | ) | | 89,407 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Below-market | (53,558 | ) | | 18,490 | | | (35,068 | ) | | | | | |
| | | | |
Ground leases: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Below-market | 2,173 | | | (267 | ) | | 1,906 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
|
The gross asset balances of the in-place value of tenant leases are included in buildings and equipment on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Acquired in-place tenant leases are amortized over periods that approximate the related lease terms. The above-market tenant and below-market ground leases are included in prepaid expenses and other assets, and below-market tenant leases are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses as detailed in Notes 4 and 6, respectively. |
|
Amortization of in-place intangible assets and liabilities decreased the Company's net income by $17.2 million, $22.4 million and $32.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amortization of in place intangibles are included in depreciation and amortization on the Company's consolidated and combined statements of operations. |
|
Amortization of above-market and below-market lease intangibles decreased the Company's revenue by $15.7 million, $21.7 million and $22.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amortization of above-market and below-market leasing intangibles are included in minimum rents on the Company's consolidated and combined statements of operations. |
|
Future amortization/accretion of these intangibles is estimated to decrease the Company's net income as follows: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year | | In-place lease intangibles | | Above/(below) market leases, net | | | | | | | | |
| | (In thousands) | | | | | | | | |
2014 | | $ | 17,477 | | | $ | 12,071 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
2015 | | $ | 12,181 | | | $ | 9,305 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
2016 | | $ | 8,758 | | | $ | 6,609 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
2017 | | $ | 5,884 | | | $ | 4,275 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
2018 | | $ | 4,094 | | | $ | 1,169 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
The Company considers all demand deposits with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents. |
Restricted Cash |
|
Restricted cash consists of security deposits and cash escrowed under loan agreements for debt service, real estate taxes, property insurance, tenant improvements, capital renovations and capital improvements. |
|
Revenue Recognition and Related Matters |
|
Minimum rent revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Minimum rent revenues also include amounts collected from tenants to allow the termination of their leases prior to their scheduled termination dates as well as the amortization related to above and below-market tenant leases on acquired properties and tenant inducements. Minimum rent revenues also includes percentage rents in lieu of minimum rent from those leases where we receive a percentage of tenant revenues. The following is a summary of amortization of straight-line rent, lease termination income, net amortization related to above and below-market tenant leases, amortization of tenant inducements, and percentage rent in lieu of minimum rent for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011: |
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | | |
| | (In thousands) | | | | |
Straight-line rent amortization | | $ | 3,488 | | | $ | 3,440 | | | $ | 5,676 | | | | | |
| | | |
Lease termination income | | 413 | | | 433 | | | 1,389 | | | | | |
| | | |
Net amortization of above and below-market tenant leases | | (15,672 | ) | | (21,700 | ) | | (22,623 | ) | | | | |
Amortization of tenant inducement | | (1,000 | ) | | — | | | — | | | | | |
| | | |
Percentage rents in lieu of minimum rent | | 7,071 | | | 8,631 | | | 9,232 | | | | | |
| | | |
|
Straight-line rent receivables represent the current net cumulative rents recognized prior to when billed and collectible, as provided by the terms of the leases. The following is a summary of straight-line rent receivables, which are included in accounts receivable, net, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reduced for allowances for doubtful accounts: |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Straight-line rent receivables, net | $ | 12,645 | | | $ | 9,694 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of accounts receivable, including straight-line rents, which is estimated to be uncollectible. Such allowances are reviewed periodically based upon our recovery experience. The Company also evaluates the probability of collecting future rent which is recognized currently under a straight-line methodology. This analysis considers the long term nature of our leases, as a certain portion of the straight-line rent currently recognizable will not be billed to the tenant until future periods. Our experience relative to unbilled straight-line rent receivable is that a certain portion of the amounts recorded as straight-line rental revenue are never collected from (or billed to) tenants due to early lease terminations. For that portion of the recognized deferred rent that is not deemed to be probable of collection, an allowance for doubtful accounts has been provided. Accounts receivable are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.8 million and $2.5 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The following table summarizes the changes in allowance for doubtful accounts for all receivables: |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | | |
| | (In thousands) | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 2,545 | | | $ | 2,943 | | | $ | 4,070 | | | | | |
| | | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | 887 | | | 1,919 | | | 601 | | | | | |
| | | |
Write-offs | | (634 | ) | | (2,317 | ) | | (1,728 | ) | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 2,798 | | | $ | 2,545 | | | $ | 2,943 | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Tenant recoveries are recoveries from tenants that are established in the leases or computed based upon a formula related to real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and are generally recognized as revenues in the period the related costs are incurred. The Company makes certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the reimbursements at the end of each reporting period. The Company does not expect the actual results to materially differ from the estimated reimbursement. |
|
Overage rent is paid by a tenant when its sales exceed an agreed-upon minimum amount. Overage rent is calculated by multiplying the sales in excess of the minimum amount by a percentage defined in the lease. Overage rent is recognized on an accrual basis once tenant sales exceed contractual tenant lease thresholds. |
|
Other revenues generally consist of amounts earned by the Company for vending, advertising, and marketing revenues earned at our malls and is recognized on an accrual basis over the related service period. |
|
Loss Per Share |
|
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated similarily, however it reflects potential dilution of securities by adding other potential shares of common stock, including stock options and nonvested restricted stock, to the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were 2,579,171 and 1,945,643 stock options outstanding, respectively, that potentially could be converted into shares of common stock and 278,617 and 263,669 shares of nonvested restricted stock outstanding, respectively. These stock options and shares of restricted stock have been excluded from this computation, as their effect is anti-dilutive. |
|
In connection with the spin-off, on January 12, 2012, GGP distributed to its stockholders 35,547,049 shares of our common stock and retained 359,056 shares of our Class B common stock. This share amount is being utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS") for all periods presented prior to the spin-off as our common stock was not traded prior to January 12, 2012 and there were no dilutive securities in the prior periods. On February 6, 2013, the 359,056 shares of our Class B common stock were converted into 359,056 shares of our common stock, at the request of the holders of the Company's Class B common stock. |
|
The Company had the following weighted-average shares outstanding: |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, | | | | | | | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares - basic and diluted | | 49,344,927 | | 46,149,893 | | | 35,906,105 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
Fair Value |
|
The objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 1 — quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 2 — observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 3 — unobservable inputs that are used when little or no market data is available. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret Level 2 and 3 inputs in determining the fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Accordingly, the Company's fair value estimates, which are made at the end of each reporting period, may be different than the amounts that may ultimately be realized upon the sale or disposition of these assets. |
|
The following table summarizes the assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as a result of the impairment charges recorded as of December 31, 2013: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Fair Value Measurement | | Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Year ended December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | |
Investment in Real Estate (1) | | $ | 33,475 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 33,475 | |
|
Explanatory Note: |
(1) Refer to "Impairment" above for additional information regarding impairment. |
|
The following is a reconciliation of the carrying value of properties that were impaired during the year ended December 31, 2013: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Boulevard Mall (1) | | Steeplegate Mall (1) | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning carrying value, January 1, 2013 | | 84,175 | | | 51,687 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | — | | | 885 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization expense | | (928 | ) | | (2,624 | ) | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss on impairment of real estate | | (21,661 | ) | | (15,159 | ) | | | | | | | | | | |
Disposition of real estate asset | | (61,586 | ) | | — | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Ending carrying value, December 31, 2013 | | — | | | 34,789 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Explanatory Note: |
(1) The carrying value includes each mall's respective land, building, in-place lease value, and above and below market lease values. |
|
The Company estimates fair value relating to impairment assessments based upon discounted cash flows that include all projected cash inflows and outflows over a specific holding period. Such projected cash flows are comprised of contractual rental revenues and forecasted rental revenues and expenses based upon market conditions and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these models are based on a reasonable range of current market rates for each property analyzed. Based upon these inputs, the Company determined that its valuation of a property using a discounted cash flow model was classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. |
|
The following table sets forth quantitative information about the unobservable inputs of the Company's Level 3 real estate, which are recorded at fair values as of December 31, 2013: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unobservable Quantitative Inputs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discount Rate | 10 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Terminal Capitalization Rate | 9 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company's financial instruments are short term in nature and as such their fair values approximate their carrying amount in our consolidated and combined financial statements except for debt. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, management’s estimates of fair value are presented below. The Company estimated the fair value of the debt using a future discounted cash flow analysis based on the use and weighting of multiple market inputs. Based on the frequency and availability of market data, the inputs used to measure the estimated fair value of debt are Level 3 inputs. The primary sensitivity in these calculations is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | |
| Carrying Amount | | Estimated Fair | | Carrying Amount | | Estimated Fair | |
Value | Value | |
| (In thousands) | |
Fixed-rate debt | $ | 1,021,432 | | | $ | 1,013,726 | | | $ | 995,545 | | | $ | 1,040,964 | | |
|
Variable-rate debt | 433,114 | | | 434,508 | | | 287,946 | | | 287,946 | | |
|
Total mortgages, notes and loans payable | $ | 1,454,546 | | | $ | 1,448,234 | | | $ | 1,283,491 | | | $ | 1,328,910 | | |
|
|
Offering Costs |
|
Costs associated with the issuance of common stock and rights offering to the Company's stockholders were deferred and charged against the gross proceeds of the offering upon the sale of shares during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (see Note 9). |
|
Leases |
|
Leases which transfer substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership to tenants are considered finance leases and the present values of the minimum lease payments and the estimated residual values of the leased properties, if any, are accounted for as receivables. Leases which transfer substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership to the Company are considered capital leases and the present values of the minimum lease payments are accounted for as assets and liabilities. All other leases are treated as operating leases. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, all of the Company's leases are treated as operating leases. |
|
Deferred Expenses |
|
Deferred expenses are comprised of deferred lease costs incurred in connection with obtaining new tenants or renewals of lease agreements with current tenants, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Deferred financing costs are amortized on a straight-line basis (which approximates the effective interest method) over the lives of the related mortgages, notes, and loans payable. The following table summarizes our deferred lease and financing costs: |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross Asset | | Accumulated | | Net Carrying | | | | | |
Amortization | Amount | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | | | | |
31-Dec-13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Deferred lease costs | $ | 43,570 | | | $ | (12,039 | ) | | $ | 31,531 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Deferred financing costs | 18,979 | | | (4,455 | ) | | 14,524 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total | $ | 62,549 | | | $ | (16,494 | ) | | $ | 46,055 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
31-Dec-12 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Deferred lease costs | $ | 31,397 | | | $ | (9,162 | ) | | $ | 22,235 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Deferred financing costs | 25,068 | | | (6,897 | ) | | 18,171 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total | $ | 56,465 | | | $ | (16,059 | ) | | $ | 40,406 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company recognizes all stock-based compensation to employees, including grants of employee stock options and restricted stock awards, in the financial statements as compensation cost. The compensation cost is amortized over the respective vesting period based on their fair value on the date of grant. |
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
The Company evaluates any potential asset retirement obligations, including those related to disposal of asbestos containing materials and environmental remediation liabilities. The Company recognizes the fair value of such obligations in the period incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be determined. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, a preliminary estimate of the cost of the environmental remediation liability is approximately $4.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The ultimate cost of remediation to be incurred by the Company in the future may differ from the estimates as of December 31, 2013. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. For example, estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to fair values of assets and liabilities for purposes of applying the acquisition method of accounting, the useful lives of assets, capitalization of development and leasing costs, recoverable amounts of receivables, impairment of long-lived assets and fair value of debt. Actual results could differ from these and other estimates. |
|
Reclassification |
|
As a result of the disposition of The Boulevard Mall, certain prior period amounts included on the Company's consolidated and combined statements of operations and related notes have been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented (see Note 7). |