Georgetown Bancorp 10-Q 2013 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to          

Commission File Number: 001-35595

GEORGETOWN BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	80-0817763
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

2 East Main Street, Georgetown, MA	01833
(Address of principal executive office)	(Zip Code)

(978) 352-8600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

None

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer                    o
Non-accelerated filer   o	Smaller reporting company  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of the latest practicable date:  Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 1,864,268 shares outstanding as of November 8, 2013.

Form 10-Q

GEORGETOWN BANCORP, INC.

Table of Contents

		Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1:	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012	1
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24
Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	36
Item 4:	Controls and Procedures	36
Part II. Other Information
Item 1:	Legal Proceedings	37
Item 1A:	Risk Factors	37
Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	37
Item 3:	Defaults upon Senior Securities	37
Item 4:	Mine Safety Disclosures	37
Item 5:	Other Information	37
Item 6:	Exhibits	38
SIGNATURES		39

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

GEORGETOWN BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

	At			At
	September 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Unaudited)
	(In thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	3,943		$	2,228
Short-term investments	4,364			4,561
Total cash and cash equivalents	8,307			6,789
Securities available for sale, at fair value	19,029			8,184
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost	1,169			1,594
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost	2,649			2,861
Loans held for sale	1,012			2,606
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $2,096,000 at September 30, 2013 and $1,780,000 at December 31, 2012	205,900			180,599
Premises and equipment, net	3,730			3,753
Accrued interest receivable	682			617
Bank-owned life insurance	2,872			2,797
Other real estate owned	20			203
Other assets	1,800			1,599
Total assets	$	247,170		$	211,602
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits	$	162,007		$	154,439
Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances	34,575			—
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances	18,100			23,600
Mortgagors’ escrow accounts	1,248			1,034
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	1,750			1,966
Total liabilities	217,680			181,039
Commitments and contingencies	—			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share: 50,000,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012; none outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share: 100,000,000 shares authorized, 1,875,310 shares issued at September 30, 2013 and 1,940,259 shares issued at December 31, 2012	19			19
Additional paid-in capital	19,809			20,669
Retained earnings	11,254			10,958
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	(257		)	183
Unearned compensation - ESOP (95,525 shares unallocated at September 30, 2013 and 101,367 shares unallocated at December 31, 2012)	(1,022		)	(1,084		)
Unearned compensation - Restricted stock (35,751 shares non-vested at September 30, 2013 and 30,281 shares non-vested at December 31, 2012)	(313		)	(182		)
Total stockholders’ equity	29,490			30,563
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	247,170		$	211,602

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

1

GEORGETOWN BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2013			2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Interest and dividend income:
Loans, including fees	$	2,340		$	2,092	$	6,685	$	6,504
Securities	125			72		263		218
Short-term investments	2			16		5		35
Total interest and dividend income	2,467			2,180		6,953		6,757
Interest expense:
Deposits	146			190		419		703
Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances	14			—		26		—
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances	129			189		421		624
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	—			—		—		1
Total interest expense	289			379		866		1,328
Net interest and dividend income	2,178			1,801		6,087		5,429
Provision for loan losses	244			67		407		162
Net interest and dividend income, after provision for loan losses	1,934			1,734		5,680		5,267
Non-interest income:
Customer service fees	141			144		422		411
Mortgage banking income, net	41			424		696		712
Income from bank-owned life insurance	26			26		75		75
Net (loss) gain on sale of other real estate owned	(4		)	19		18		19
Other	37			3		96		11
Total non-interest income	241			616		1,307		1,228
Non-interest expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits	1,124			1,065		3,555		3,154
Occupancy and equipment expenses	222			228		664		659
Data processing expenses	117			161		465		406
Professional fees	102			96		321		310
Advertising expenses	76			101		226		284
FDIC insurance	31			41		106		118
Other general and administrative expenses	252			266		825		737
Total non-interest expenses	1,924			1,958		6,162		5,668
Income before income taxes	251			392		825		827
Income tax provision	83			148		299		295
Net income	$	168		$	244	$	526	$	532
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic	1,781,959			1,835,273		1,818,040		1,890,379
Diluted	1,784,492			1,835,273		1,823,016		1,890,379
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.09		$	0.13	$	0.29	$	0.28
Diluted	$	0.09		$	0.13	$	0.29	$	0.28

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

GEORGETOWN BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(In thousands)
Net income	$	168		$	244		$	526		$	532
Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale	(29		)	61			(686		)	89
Income tax benefit (provision)	10			(22		)	246			(32		)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	(19		)	39			(440		)	57
Comprehensive income	$	149		$	283		$	86		$	589

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

GEORGETOWN BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(unaudited)

										Accumulated
				Additional						Other			Unearned			Unearned
	Common			Paid-in			Retained			Comprehensive			Compensation-			Compensation-			Treasury
	Stock			Capital			Earnings			(Loss) Income			ESOP			Restricted Stock			Stock			Total
	(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	278		$	11,496		$	10,010		$	134		$	(286	)	$	(167	)	$	(1,136	)	$	20,329
Net income	—			—			532			—			—			—			—			532
Other comprehensive income	—			—			—			57			—			—			—			57
Reorganization and related stock offering:
Exchange of common stock: 2,777,750 shares at $0.10 par value per share for 1,940,259 shares at $0.01 par value per share	(259		)	259																		—
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock (1,100,000 shares)	—			9,930			—			—			—			—			—			9,930
Common stock acquired by ESOP (88,000 shares)	—			—			—			—			(880		)	—			—			(880		)
Merger of Georgetown Bancorp, MHC	—			5			—			—			—			—			��			5
Common stock held by ESOP allocated or committed to be allocated (5,430 shares)	—			(7		)	—			—			62			—			—			55
Restricted stock granted in connection with equity incentive plan (12,606 shares)	—			109			—			—			—			(109		)	—			—
Forfeiture of restricted stock (1,620 shares)	—			(13		)	—			—			—			13			—			—
Reissuance of treasury stock (7,027 shares)	—			(83		)	—			—			—			—			83			—
Purchase of treasury stock (986 shares)	—			—			—			—			—			—			(8		)	(8		)
Retirement of treasury stock				(1,061		)	—			—			—			—			1,061			—
Share based compensation - options	—			26			—			—			—			—			—			26
Share based compensation - restricted stock	—			—			—			—			—			59			—			59
Balance at September 30, 2012	$	19		$	20,661		$	10,542		$	191		$	(1,104	)	$	(204	)	$	—		$	30,105
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	19		$	20,669		$	10,958		$	183		$	(1,084	)	$	(182	)	$	—		$	30,563
Net income	—			—			526			—			—			—			—			526
Other comprehensive loss	—			—			—			(440		)	—			—			—			(440		)
Cash dividends paid ($0.04 per share)	—			—			(230		)	—			—			—			—			(230		)
Repurchased stock related to buyback program (79,247 shares)	—			(1,091		)	—			—			—			—			—			(1,091		)
Common stock held by ESOP allocated or committed to be allocated (5,429 shares)	—			12			—			—			62			—			—			74
Restricted stock granted in connection with equity incentive plan (22,000 shares)	—			281			—			—			—			(281		)	—			—
Purchased stock related to vested restricted stock (1,933 shares)	—			(25		)	—			—			—			—			—			(25		)
Forfeiture of restricted stock (5,769 shares)	—			(60		)	—			—			—			60			—			—
Cash disposition of stock options	—			(17		)	—			—			—			—			—			(17		)
Share based compensation - options	—			40			—			—			—			—			—			40
Share based compensation - restricted stock	—			—			—			—			—			90			—			90
Balance at September 30, 2013	$	19		$	19,809		$	11,254		$	(257	)	$	(1,022	)	$	(313	)	$	—		$	29,490
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

GEORGETOWN BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	526		$	532
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	407			162
Amortization of securities, net	87			10
Net change in deferred loan fees and costs	76			(261		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	210			207
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable	(65		)	26
Income from bank-owned life insurance	(75		)	(75		)
Stock-based compensation expense	204			140
Gain on sales of loans	(810		)	(843		)
Loans originated for sale	(30,706		)	(40,394		)
Proceeds from sales of loans	33,110			41,037
Gain on sale of other real estate owned	(18		)	(19		)
Write down of other real estate owned	5			—
Decrease in prepaid FDIC insurance	215			108
Net change in other assets and liabilities	(386		)	1,552
Net cash provided by operating activities	2,780			2,182
Cash flows from investing activities:
Activity in securities available for sale:
Maturities, prepayments and calls	2,200			1,658
Purchases	(13,820		)	(4,152		)
Maturities, prepayments and calls of securities held to maturity	427			560
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock	212			250
Loan originations, net	(26,028		)	6,942
Principal balance of loans purchased	—			(9,882		)
Principal balance of portfolio loans sold	—			314
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned	440			94
Purchase of premises and equipment	(187		)	(135		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(36,756		)	(4,351		)

(continued)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

GEORGETOWN BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(concluded)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net change in deposits	7,568			1,805
Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase	—			(573		)
Net change in Federal Home Loan Bank advances with maturities of three months or less	34,575			—
Proceeds of Federal Home Loan Bank advances with maturities greater than three months	2,000			8,500
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances with maturities greater than three months	(7,500		)	(9,021		)
Net change in mortgagors’ escrow accounts	214			168
Repurchase of common stock	(1,116		)	(8		)
Cash dividends paid on common stock	(230		)	—
Cash disposition of stock options	(17		)	—
Cash received from Georgetown Bancorp, MHC due to reorganization	—			5
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock	—			9,050
Net cash provided by financing activities	35,494			9,926
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	1,518			7,757
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	6,789			19,083
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	8,307		$	26,840
Supplementary information:
Interest paid on deposit accounts	$	418		$	706
Interest paid on advances	464			638
Income taxes paid	548			220
Loans transferred to other real estate owned	244			253

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

GEORGETOWN BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of Georgetown Bancorp, Inc., a Maryland corporation, (the “Company”) were prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and with Regulation S-X and do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for future periods, including the entire fiscal year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the December 31, 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements presented in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2013. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Georgetown Bank (the “Bank”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Georgetown Securities Corporation, which engages in the buying, selling and holding of securities. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These consolidated financial statements consider events that occurred through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued.

(2)Corporate Structure

In conjunction with its reorganization into the mutual holding company structure, on January 5, 2005, the Bank (i) converted to a stock savings bank as the successor to the Bank in its mutual form; (ii) organized Georgetown Bancorp, Inc., (“Georgetown Federal”) as a federally-chartered corporation that owned 100% of the common stock of the Bank (in stock form); and (iii) organized Georgetown Bancorp, MHC as a federally-chartered mutual holding company that owned 56.7% of the Common Stock of Georgetown Federal as of June 30, 2012. On November 28, 2011, the Boards of Directors of Georgetown Federal, Georgetown Bancorp, MHC and the Bank each unanimously adopted a Plan of Conversion or Reorganization of the Mutual Holding Company pursuant to which Georgetown Bancorp, MHC undertook a “second-step” conversion and now ceases to exist. Georgetown Bancorp, MHC reorganized from a two-tier mutual holding company structure to a fully public stock holding company structure effective July 11, 2012, and, as a result, the Bank is now the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

As a result of the second-step conversion, all shares and per share amounts in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income and notes to consolidated financial statements have been restated giving retroactive recognition to the second-step exchange ratio of 0.72014-to-one. Options presented under the Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, common shares held by the Bank’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) and shares of restricted stock before the second-step conversion were also exchanged using the exchange ratio of 0.72014-to-one. Additionally, all treasury shares were retired as part of the second-step conversion.

7

(3)Earnings Per Common Share

The Company has adopted the Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) guidance included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260-10. As presented below, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. For purposes of computing diluted EPS, the treasury stock method is used.

Unallocated ESOP shares are not deemed outstanding for earnings per share calculations.

Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following.

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net income available to common stockholders	$	168,000		$	244,000		$	526,000		$	532,000
Basic common shares:
Weighted average shares outstanding	1,843,319			1,910,017			1,880,981			1,908,847
Less:  Weighted average unallocated ESOP shares	(97,111		)	(105,025		)	(98,921		)	(47,909		)
Add:  Weighted average unvested restricted shares with non-forfeitable dividend rights	35,751			30,281			35,980			29,441
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	1,781,959			1,835,273			1,818,040			1,890,379
Dilutive potential common shares	2,533			—			4,976			—
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	1,784,492			1,835,273			1,823,016			1,890,379
Basic earnings per share	$	0.09		$	0.13		$	0.29		$	0.28
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.09		$	0.13		$	0.29		$	0.28

Options to purchase 52,924 shares, representing outstanding options that were granted in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three-month period ended September 30, 2013. Options to purchase 33,774 shares, representing outstanding options that were granted in 2010, 2011 and 2012, were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013. Options to purchase 19,150 shares that were granted in 2013 were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013, because to do so would have been antidilutive. Options to purchase 40,681 shares, representing all outstanding options, were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012. However, the result of the computation for the three and nine- months ended September 30, 2012 was that there were no dilutive potential common shares.

(4)Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210):  Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” The objective of this ASU is to enhance current disclosures. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-06, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Subsequent Accounting for an Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition Date as a Result of a Government-Assisted Acquisition of a Financial Institution.” The amendments in this update clarify the applicable guidance for subsequently measuring an indemnification asset recognized as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution. For public and nonpublic entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

8

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The amendments in this update do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. However, the amendments require an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, “Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date.” The objective of the amendments in this ASU is to provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. Examples of obligations within the scope of this ASU include debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013; and should be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements within the ASU scope that exist at the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year of adoption. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The amendments in this ASU are being issued to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting. The guidance provides principles for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities and requirements for financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting. Additionally, the amendments require disclosures about an entity’s plan for liquidation, the methods and significant assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities, the type and amount of costs and income accrued and the expected duration of the liquidation process. The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013 and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this guidance will not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-10, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) — Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) (“OIS”) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes.” The amendments in this ASU permit the OIS to be used as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815, in addition to Treasury Obligations of the U.S. government (“UST”) and the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The amendments also remove the restriction on using different benchmark rates for similar hedges. The amendments apply to all entities that elect to apply hedge accounting of the benchmark interest rate under Topic 815. The amendments are effective prospectively for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013.  The Company anticipates that the adoption of this guidance will not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, “Income Taxes — Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” The amendments in this ASU provide guidance for the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The amendments in this ASU are expected to reduce diversity in practice by providing guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits and will better reflect the manner in which an entity would settle at the reporting date any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position when net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax losses, or tax credit carryforwards exist. The amendments apply to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date and are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.  The Company anticipates that the adoption of this guidance will not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.

9

(5)Securities

A summary of securities is as follows.

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
	(In thousands)
At September 30, 2013
Securities available for sale
State and municipal	$	2,516	$	2	$	(118	)	$	2,400
Residential mortgage-backed securities	16,915		94		(380		)	16,629
Total securities available for sale	$	19,431	$	96	$	(498	)	$	19,029
Securities held to maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities	$	1,169	$	94	$	—		$	1,263

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
	(In thousands)
At December 31, 2012
Securities available for sale
Residential mortgage-backed securities	$	7,900	$	284	$	—	$	8,184
Securities held to maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities	$	1,594	$	137	$	—	$	1,731

All residential mortgage-backed securities have been issued by government-sponsored enterprises.

10

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity at September 30, 2013 is as follows. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
	(In thousands)
Over ten years	$	2,516	$	2,400	$	—	$	—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	16,915		16,629		1,169		1,263
	$	19,431	$	19,029	$	1,169	$	1,263

There were no sales of securities for the three and nine-months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, is as follows.

	Less Than Twelve Months				Greater Than Twelve Months
	Gross				Gross
	Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair
	Losses		Value		Losses		Value
	(In thousands)
At September 30, 2013:
Securities available for sale
State and municipal	$	118	$	1,832	$	—	$	—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	380		10,727		—		—
Total securities available for sale	$	498	$	12,559	$	—	$	—

Each reporting period, the Company evaluates all securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity with a decline in fair value below the amortized cost of the investment to determine whether or not the impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary (“OTTI”).

At September 30, 2013 twelve securities classified as available for sale had an unrealized loss with aggregate depreciation of 3.82% from the securities amortized cost basis.  The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in state and municipal bonds and residential mortgage backed securities were primarily caused by changes in interest rates and not by credit quality.  Many of these investments are guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies and as management has not decided to sell these securities, nor is it likely that the Company will be required to sell these securities, no declines are deemed to be other than temporary.

There were no securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2012.

11

(6)Loans and Servicing

Loans

A summary of loans is as follows.

	At					At
	September 30,					December 31,
	2013					2012
	Amount			Percent		Amount			Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential loans:
One- to four-family	$	93,736		45.17	%	$	95,546		52.54	%
Home equity loans and lines of credit	15,240			7.34		15,560			8.56
Total residential mortgage loans	108,976			52.51		111,106			61.10
Commercial loans:
One- to four-family investment property	13,017			6.27		11,355			6.25
Multi-family real estate	5,731			2.76		5,346			2.94
Commercial real estate	47,987			23.13		32,730			18.00
Commercial business	11,408			5.50		8,653			4.76
Total commercial loans	78,143			37.66		58,084			31.95
Construction loans:
One- to four-family	7,897			3.81		7,379			4.06
Multi-family	6,947			3.35		3,665			2.02
Non-residential	5,120			2.47		1,161			0.64
Total construction loans	19,964			9.63		12,205			6.72
Consumer	419			0.20		414			0.23
Total loans	207,502			100.00	%	181,809			100.00	%
Other items:
Net deferred loan costs	494					570
Allowance for loan losses	(2,096		)			(1,780		)
Total loans, net	$	205,900				$	180,599

12

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses at and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and at December 31, 2012 is below. For additional information please refer to Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

	Residential						Commercial											Construction
	One- to four- family			Home equity loans and lines of credit			One- to four- family investment property			Multi-family real estate			Commercial real estate		Commercial business			One- to four- family			Multi-family			Non- residential		Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
Beginning Balance	$	378		$	254		$	62		$	40		$	668	$	159		$	149		$	34		$	25	$	11		$	1,780
Charge-offs	(130		)	—			—			—			—		—			—			—			—		(7		)	(137		)
Recoveries	43			—			—			—			—		—			—			—			—		3			46
Provision (benefit)	(4		)	(18		)	10			3			216		49			38			30			78		5			407
Ending Balance	$	287		$	236		$	72		$	43		$	884	$	208		$	187		$	64		$	103	$	12		$	2,096
Nine months ended September 30, 2012
Beginning Balance	$	346		$	341		$	59		$	98		$	400	$	234		$	228		$	98		$	11	$	9		$	1,824
Charge-offs	(144		)	—			—			—			—		(11		)	(191		)	—			—		(31		)	(377		)
Recoveries	137			—			—			—			—		—			—			—			—		5			142
Provision (benefit)	21			(82		)	(8		)	(27		)	248		(99		)	113			(32		)	1		27			162
Ending Balance	$	360		$	259		$	51		$	71		$	648	$	124		$	150		$	66		$	12	$	10		$	1,751
At September 30, 2013
Allowance for loan losses
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	7		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	210	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	217
Collectively evaluated for impairment	280			236			72			43			674		208			187			64			103		12			1,879
	$	287		$	236		$	72		$	43		$	884	$	208		$	187		$	64		$	103	$	12		$	2,096
Loans
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	322		$	429		$	—		$	—		$	2,408	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	3,159
Collectively evaluated for impairment	93,414			14,811			13,017			5,731			45,579		11,408			7,897			6,947			5,120		419			204,343
	$	93,736		$	15,240		$	13,017		$	5,731		$	47,987	$	11,408		$	7,897		$	6,947		$	5,120	$	419		$	207,502
At December 31, 2012
Allowance for loan losses
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	93		$	13		$	—		$	—		$	214	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	320
Collectively evaluated for impairment	285			241			62			40			454		159			149			34			25		11			1,460
	$	378		$	254		$	62		$	40		$	668	$	159		$	149		$	34		$	25	$	11		$	1,780
Loans
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	658		$	45		$	—		$	—		$	2,412	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	3,115
Collectively evaluated for impairment	94,888			15,515			11,355			5,346			30,318		8,653			7,379			3,665			1,161		414			178,694
	$	95,546		$	15,560		$	11,355		$	5,346		$	32,730	$	8,653		$	7,379		$	3,665		$	1,161	$	414		$	181,809

13

The following is a summary of past-due and non-accrual loans at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. For additional information please refer to Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

	Loans delinquent for:												90 days
					90 days		Total		Total		Total		or more		Non-accrual
	30 - 59 Days		60 - 89 Days		or more		Past Due		Current		Loans		and accruing		Loans
	(In thousands)
At September 30, 2013:
Residential loans:
One- to four-family	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	93,736	$	93,736	$	—	$	—
Home equity loans and lines of credit	15		—		399		414		14,826		15,240		—		399
Commercial loans:
One- to four-family investment property	—		—		—		—		13,017		13,017		—		—
Multi-family real estate	—		—		—		—		5,731		5,731		—		—
Commercial real estate	570		—		—		570		47,417		47,987		—		—
Commercial business	—		—		—		—		11,408		11,408		—		—
Construction loans:
One- to four-family	—		—		—		—		7,897		7,897		—		—
Multi-family	—		—		—		—		6,947		6,947		—		—
Non-residential	—		—		—		—		5,120		5,120		—		—
Consumer	1		—		—		1		418		419		—		—
Total	$	586	$	—	$	399	$	985	$	206,517	$	207,502	$	—	$	399
At December 31, 2012:
Residential loans:
One- to four-family	$	—	$	284	$	374	$	658	$	94,888	$	95,546	$	—	$	658
Home equity loans and lines of credit	16		—		399		415		15,145		15,560		—		412
Commercial loans:
One- to four-family investment property	—		—		—		—		11,355		11,355		—		—
Multi-family real estate	—		—		—		—		5,346		5,346		—		—
Commercial real estate	1,258		—		—		1,258		31,472		32,730		—		2,105
Commercial business	—		—		—		—		8,653		8,653		—		—
Construction loans:
One- to four-family	—		—		—		—		7,379		7,379		—		—
Multi-family	—		—		—		—		3,665		3,665		—		—
Non-residential	—		—		—		—		1,161		1,161		—		—
Consumer	20		2		—		22		392		414		—		—
Total	$	1,294	$	286	$	773	$	2,353	$	179,456	$	181,809	$	—	$	3,175

14

The following is an analysis of impaired loans at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
	(In thousands)
At September 30, 2013
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
Residential loans:
One- to four-family	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Home equity loans and lines of credit	429		429		—		390		1
Commercial loans:
One- to four-family investment property	—		—		—		—		—
Multi-family real estate	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial business	—		—		—		—		—
Construction loans:
One- to four-family	—		—		—		—		—
Multi-family	—		—		—		—		—
Non-residential	—		—		—		—		—
Consumer	—		—		—		—		—
Total impaired with no related allowance	$	429	$	429	$	—	$	390	$	1
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
Residential loans:
One- to four-family	$	322	$	322	$	7	$	397	$	9
Home equity loans and lines of credit	—		—		—		11		—
Commercial loans:
One- to four-family investment property	—		—		—		—		—
Multi-family real estate	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate	2,408		2,511		210		2,410		93
Commercial business	—		—		—		—		—
Construction loans:
One- to four-family	—		—		—		—		—
Multi-family	—		—		—		—		—
Non-residential	—		—		—		—		—
Consumer	—		—		—		—		—
Total with an allowance recorded	$	2,730	$	2,833	$	217	$	2,818	$	102
At December 31, 2012
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
Residential loans:
One- to four-family	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	176	$	—
Home equity loans and lines of credit	32		32		—		30		—
Commercial loans:
One- to four-family investment property	—		—		—		—		—
Multi-family real estate	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial business	—		—		—		—		—
Construction loans:
One- to four-family	—		—		—		801		—
Multi-family	—		—		—		344		23
Non-residential	—		—		—		—		—
Consumer	—		—		—		—		—
Total impaired with no related allowance	$	32	$	32	$	—	$	1,351	$	23
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
Residential loans:
One- to four-family	$	658	$	684	$	93	$	734	$	10
Home equity loans and lines of credit	13		13		13		13		1
Commercial loans:
One- to four-family investment property	—		—		—		—		—
Multi-family real estate	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate	2,412		2,519		214		958		19
Commercial business	—		—		—		6		—
Construction loans:
One- to four-family	—		—		—		—		—
Multi-family	—		—		—		—		—
Non-residential	—		—		—		—		—
Consumer	—		—		—		—		—
Total with an allowance recorded	$	3,083	$	3,216	$	320	$	1,711	$	30

15

There was one loan modification made that resulted in the classification of a troubled debt restructure (TDR) during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. This TDR did not result in a material impact to the allowance for loan losses account. The modification consolidated an adjustable rate one- to four-family residential loan and a fixed home equity loan into a single fixed rate one- to four-family residential loan. In addition to the consolidation of the loans $32,000 was advanced to the borrower.  There is no commitment to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were modified in a troubled debt restructuring as of September 30, 2013.

There were two loan modifications made during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 that were classified as TDR, which  did not result in a material impact to the allowance for loan loss account.  A one- to four-family construction loan was modified with terms that included an extension of the maturity date, as well as $35,000 in additional funds in order to complete the project and allow time for the sale of the property. This loan subsequently paid in full during 2012 according to its modified terms.  The second modification involved a home equity loan that was issued to facilitate the borrower’s ability to refinance at another financial institution their first mortgage held by the Bank. The refinancing of the first mortgage resulted in the Company recording a loan loss recovery of $133,000.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 there were no TDRs in default of their modified terms.

16

The following table represents the Company’s loans by risk rating at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. For additional information please refer to Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

	Residential				Commercial								Construction
	One- to four- family		Home equity loans and lines of credit		One- to four- family investment property		Multi-family real estate		Commercial real estate		Commercial business		One- to four- family		Multi-family		Non- residential		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)
At September 30, 2013
Classification:
Not formally rated	$	93,414	$	14,841	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	419	$	108,674
Pass	—		—		13,017		5,731		45,579		11,343		7,897		6,947		5,120		—		95,634
Special mention	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard	322		399		—		—		2,408		65		—		—		—		—		3,194
Doubtful	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total loans	$	93,736	$	15,240	$	13,017	$	5,731	$	47,987	$	11,408	$	7,897	$	6,947	$	5,120	$	419	$	207,502
At December 31, 2012
Classification:
Not formally rated	$	94,888	$	15,116	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	414	$	110,418
Pass	—		—		11,355		5,346		29,147		8,486		7,379		3,665		1,161		—		66,539
Special mention	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard	658		444		—		—		3,583		167		—		—		—		—		4,852
Doubtful	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total loans	$	95,546	$	15,560	$	11,355	$	5,346	$	32,730	$	8,653	$	7,379	$	3,665	$	1,161	$	414	$	181,809

17

Credit Quality Information

The Bank utilizes a nine grade internal loan rating system for all commercial and construction loans as follows:

Loans rated 1 - 5:  Loans in these categories are considered “pass” rated loans with low to average risk and are not formally rated.

Loans rated 6:  Loans in this category are considered “special mention.” These loans have risk profiles that are starting to show signs of potential weakness and are being closely monitored by management.

Loans rated 7:  Loans in this category are considered “substandard.” These loans have a well defined weakness that jeopardizes the liquidation of the debt and is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or pledged collateral. There is a distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Loans rated 8:  Loans in this category are considered “doubtful.” Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans rated 9:  Loans in this category are considered a “loss.” The loan has been determined to be uncollectible and the chance of loss is inevitable. Loans in this category will be charged-off.

On an annual basis, or more often if needed, the Bank formally reviews the ratings on all commercial and construction loans.

Loans serviced for others and mortgage servicing rights

Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of mortgage loans serviced for others were $114.4 million and $96.8 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The risks inherent in the mortgage servicing assets relate primarily to changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. The fair value of servicing rights was $1.3 million at September 30, 2013 and was determined using the moving average 10-year, U.S. Treasury rate plus 5.0%, adjusted to reflect the current credit spreads and conditions in the market as a discount rate. Prepayment assumptions, which are impacted by loan rates and terms, are calculated using a moving average of prepayment data published by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and an independent third party proprietary analysis of prepayment rates embedded in liquid mortgage securities markets and modeled against the serviced loan portfolio by the independent third party valuation specialist.

The following summarizes mortgage servicing rights capitalized and amortized, along with the aggregate activity-related valuation allowances.

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
	(In thousands)
Mortgage servicing rights:
Balance at beginning of period	$	910		$	475
Additions	440			386
Disposals	—			—
Amortization	(254		)	(173		)
Balance at end of period	1,096			688
Valuation allowances:
Balance at beginning of period	20			17
Additions	58			60
Recoveries	(15		)	—
Write-downs	—			—
Balance at end of period	63			77
Mortgage servicing assets, net	$	1,033		$	611
Fair value of mortgage servicing assets	$	1,286		$	639

18

(7)Secured Borrowings and Collateral

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

At September 30, 2013, all Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Boston advances were secured by a blanket security agreement on qualified collateral, principally first mortgage loans on owner-occupied residential property in the amount of $85.1 million, and mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of $17.9 million.

(8)Fair Value Measurements

The Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value as follows:

Level l - Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level l assets and liabilities generally include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market. At September 30, 2013, the Company had no assets or liabilities valued using Level 1 measurements.

Level 2 - Valuation is based on observable inputs other than Level l prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

All of the Company’s securities that are measured at fair value are included in Level 2 and are based on pricing models from independent, third party pricing services that consider standard input factors such as observable market data, benchmark yields, interest rate volatilities, broker/dealer quotes, credit spreads and new issue data. There are no liabilities measured at fair value. All of the Company’s impaired loans and other real estate owned that are measured at fair value are included in Level 3 and are based on the appraised value of the underlying collateral considering discounting factors, if deemed appropriate, and adjusted for selling costs. These appraised values may be discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, expertise or changes in market conditions from time of valuation. The Company did not have any significant transfers of assets or liabilities to or from Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the nine month period ended September 30, 2013.

19

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are summarized below.

							Assets
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		at Fair Value
	(In thousands)
At September 30, 2013
Assets
Securities available for sale
State and municipal	$	—	$	2,400	$	—	$	2,400
Residential mortgage-backed securities	—		16,629		—		16,629
Total securities available for sale	$	—	$	19,029	$	—	$	19,029
At December 31, 2012
Assets
Securities available for sale
Residential mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	8,184	$	—	$	8,184

The Company may also be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are summarized below. The fair value adjustments relate to the amount of write-down recorded or related allowance recorded as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

							Assets		Adjustments
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		at Fair Value		to Fair Value
	(In thousands)
At September 30, 2013
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	2,513	$	2,513	$	(217	)
Other real estate owned	—		—		20		20		(24		)
	$	—	$	—	$	2,533	$	2,533	$	(241	)

							Assets		Adjustments
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		at Fair Value		to Fair Value
	(In thousands)
At December 31, 2012
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	2,763	$	2,763	$	(320	)
Other real estate owned	—		—		203		203		(19		)
	$	—	$	—	$	2,966	$	2,966	$	(339	)

20

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments.

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts of cash and short-term investments approximate fair values.

Securities: Fair values for the Company’s debt securities are based on pricing models that consider standard input factors such as observable market data, benchmark yields, interest rate volatilities, broker/dealer quotes, credit spreads and new issue data.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock: Fair value is based on redemption provisions of the FHLB of Boston. The FHLB stock has no quoted market value.

Loans held for sale: Fair value is based on committed secondary market prices.

Loans: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

Capitalized mortgage servicing rights: Fair value is based on a quarterly, independent third-party valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The model utilizes a variety of assumptions, the most significant of which are loan prepayment assumptions and the discount rate used to discount future cash flows. Prepayment assumptions, which are impacted by loan rates and terms, are calculated using a moving average of prepayment data published by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and a third party proprietary analysis of prepayment rates embedded in liquid mortgage securities markets and modeled against the serviced loan portfolio by the independent third party valuation specialist. The discount rate is the moving average 10-year, U.S. Treasury rate plus 5.0% and adjusted to reflect the current credit spreads and conditions in the market. Other assumptions include delinquency rates, foreclosure rates, servicing cost inflation, and annual unit loan cost. All assumptions are adjusted periodically to reflect current circumstances and all are obtained from independent market sources.

Deposits: The fair values for non-certificate accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date which is the carrying amount. Fair values for certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies market interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Short-term FHLB advances: The fair value of short-term FHLB advances approximates carrying value, as they generally mature within 90 days.

Long-term FHLB advances: The fair value for long-term FHLB advances is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on current market borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Accrued interest:  The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Off-balance-sheet instruments:  Fair values for off-balance-sheet, credit-related financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair value of commitments outstanding is not significant since fees charged are not material.

21

The estimated fair values and related carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows.

	September 30, 2013
	Carrying
	Amount		Fair Value
			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,307	$	8,307	$	—	$	—	$	8,307
Securities available for sale	19,029		—		19,029		—		19,029
Securities held to maturity	1,169		—		1,263		—		1,263
FHLB stock	2,649		2,649		—		—		2,649
Loans held for sale	1,012		1,027		—		—		1,027
Loans, net	205,900		—		—		206,781		206,781
Accrued interest receivable	682		682		—		—		682
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights	1,033		—		1,286		—		1,286
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	162,007	$	—	$	162,383	$	—	$	162,383
Short-term FHLB advances	34,575		—		34,575		—		34,575
Long-term FHLB advances	18,100		—		18,402		—		18,402
Mortgagers’ escrow accounts	1,248		1,248		—		—		1,248
Accrued interest payable	44		44		—		—		44

	December 31, 2012
	Carrying
	Amount		Fair Value
			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	6,789	$	6,789	$	—	$	—	$	6,789
Securities available for sale	8,184		—		8,184		—		8,184
Securities held to maturity	1,594		—		1,731		—		1,731
FHLB stock	2,861		2,861		—		—		2,861
Loans held for sale	2,606		2,642		—		—		2,642
Loans, net	180,599		—		—		188,198		188,198
Accrued interest receivable	617		617		—		—		617
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights	890		—		1,099		—		1,099
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	154,439	$	—	$	154,860	$	—	$	154,860
Long-term FHLB advances	23,600		—		24,100		—		24,100
Mortgagers’ escrow accounts	1,034		1,034		—		—		1,034
Accrued interest payable	60		60		—		—		60

22

(9)Equity Incentive Plan

At September 30, 2013, the Company had one equity incentive plan, which was described more fully in Note 13 of the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The following table presents the activity for the plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

	Stock Options
	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year	40,681			$	9.49
Granted	22,000			$	14.00
Cancelled	(3,988		)	$	9.85
Forfeited	(5,769		)	$	11.45
Outstanding at end of period	52,924			$	11.12
Exercisable at end of period	17,176
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period	$	5.31

Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
Number	Weighted-Average	Weighted		Number	Weighted
Outstanding	Remaining	Average		Exercisable	Average
as of 09/30/2013	Contractual Life	Exercise Price		as of 09/30/2013	Exercise Price
10,712	6.40 Years	$	9.33	8,406	$	9.33
12,166	7.40 Years	$	9.55	6,135	$	9.55
10,896	8.40 Years	$	9.58	2,635	$	9.58
19,150	9.40 Years	$	14.00	—
52,924	8.13 Years	$	11.12	17,176	$	9.45

	Non-vested
	Restricted Stock
	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Value
Outstanding at beginning of year	30,281		$	8.49
Granted	22,000		$	12.76
Vested	(10,761	)	$	8.48
Forfeited	(5,769	)	$	10.31
Outstanding at end of period	35,751		$	10.83

As of September 30, 2013, unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to non-vested options amounted to $132,000 and the unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock amounted to $313,000. Both amounts are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.5 years.

23

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recognized compensation expense for stock options of $40,000 with a related tax benefit of $7,000. The related tax benefit applies only to non-qualified stock options. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recognized compensation expense for restricted stock awards of $90,000 with a related tax benefit of $36,000.

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This document may contain certain forward-looking statements, such as statements of the Company’s or the Bank’s plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “subject,” and “believe”, “will”, “intends”, “will be” or “would”. These statements are subject to change based on various important factors (some of which are beyond the Company’s or the Bank’s control) and actual results may differ materially. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis of factors only as of the date of which they are given. These factors include general economic conditions, trends in interest rates, the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, the ability of the Company or the Bank to effectively manage its growth, and results of regulatory examinations, among other factors. The foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described in other documents the  Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Except as required by applicable law and regulation, the Company does not undertake — and specifically disclaims any obligation — to publicly release the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Overview

The Company’s results of operations depend primarily on net interest and dividend income, which is the difference between the interest and dividend income earned on its interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest expense on its interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and advances. The Company also generates non-interest income, primarily from gain on sale of loans. Fees and service charges are additional sources of non-interest income. The Company’s non-interest expense primarily consists of employee compensation and benefits, occupancy and equipment expense, advertising, data processing, professional fees and other operating expenses.

Asset quality continued to improve, as non-performing assets to total assets declined to 0.17% at September 30, 2013. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 decreased $6,000, or 1.1% compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease in net income was driven by an increase in non-interest expenses, partially offset by the expansion of our net interest margin and an increase in non-interest income. Net interest and dividend income increased primarily due to a decrease in funding costs, as we were successful in lowering rates paid on deposits and advances. Non-interest income increased $79,000, or 6.4% primarily due to fees associated with commercial lines of credit facilities. Mortgage banking income has been relativity flat from last year, as the volume of residential loan sales has been negatively affected by lower loan refinancing volumes and mortgage originator turnover. The increase in non-interest expenses was primarily due to increases in salary and benefits, as the Company increased staff and replaced existing staff at higher salaries. The Company continues to focus on generating commercial loans and core deposit growth, the development of our mortgage banking operation and increasing operating efficiencies, which we believe will build long-term shareholder value.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those that involve significant judgments and assumptions by management and that have, or could have, a material impact on our income or the carrying value of our assets. Our critical accounting policies are those related to our allowance for loan losses and the valuation of our deferred tax assets.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a monthly basis by management and is based upon management’s monthly review of the collectability of the loans in light of known and inherent risks in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. Additionally, as part of the evaluation of the level of the allowance for loan losses, on a quarterly basis management analyzes several qualitative loan portfolio risk factors including, but not limited to, charge-off history, changes in management or underwriting policies, current economic conditions, delinquency statistics, geographic and industry concentrations, the adequacy of the underlying collateral, the financial strength of the borrower and results of internal and external loan reviews. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance for loan losses consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For such loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance for loan losses is established when the discounted cash flows or the fair value of the existing collateral (less costs to sell) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general

24

component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. An unallocated component may be maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.

We periodically may agree to modify the contractual terms of loans. When a loan is modified and a concession is made to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty, the modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring. All troubled debt restructurings are initially classified as impaired.

Adjustable-rate mortgage loans decrease the risk associated with changes in market interest rates by periodically repricing, but involve other risks because, as interest rates increase, the underlying payments by the borrower increase, thus increasing the potential for default by the borrower. At the same time, the marketability of the underlying collateral may be adversely affected by higher interest rates. Upward adjustment of the contractual interest rate is also limited by the maximum periodic and lifetime interest rate adjustments permitted by our loan documents and, therefore, the effectiveness of adjustable-rate mortgage loans may be limited during periods of rapidly rising interest rates.

Loans secured by commercial real estate, multi-family and one- to four-family investment properties generally involve larger principal amounts and a greater degree of risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Because payments on loans secured by commercial real estate, including multi-family and one- to four-family investment properties, are often dependent on successful operation or management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy.

Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, commercial business loans generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. Further, any collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value.

Construction and development financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of construction cost proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed in order to protect the value of the property. Additionally, if the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, we may be confronted with a project, when completed, having a value that is insufficient to assure full repayment.

Income Taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax basis of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets when, based upon the available evidence including historical and projected taxable income, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

Total assets increased $35.6 million, or 16.8%, to $247.2 million at September 30, 2013 from $211.6 million at December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily from increases in loans and securities available for sale.

Cash and cash equivalents increased $1.5 million, or 22.4%, to $8.3 million at September 30, 2013 from $6.8 million at December 31, 2012. The increase in cash and cash equivalents resulted from a temporary increase in cash. We expect cash and cash equivalents balances to decrease as they are used to fund loan demand.

Loans, net (excluding loans held for sale) increased $25.3 million, or 14.0%, to $205.9 million at September 30, 2013 from $180.6 million at December 31, 2012, due primarily to an increase in commercial real estate loans and construction loans, partially offset by decreases in one- to four-family and home equity loans. Despite the current competitive market, we have decided to maintain our historically high underwriting standards instead of relaxing these standards and we have not reduced loan rates below levels at which we could not operate profitably. Commercial real estate loans increased $15.3 million, or 46.6%, to $48.0 million at September 30, 2013 from $32.7 million at December 31, 2012. Commercial loans collateralized by residential properties increased $2.0 million, or 12.3%, to $18.7 million at September 30, 2013 from $16.7 million at December 31, 2012. Construction loans increased $7.8 million, or 63.6%, to $20.0 million at September 30, 2013 from $12.2 million at December 31, 2012, primarily due to a $4.0 million, or 341.0% increase in non-residential construction loans. The majority of our construction loans remain collateralized by residential real estate (74.4% at September 30, 2013 and 90.5% at December 31, 2012). Commercial business loans increased $2.8 million, or 31.8%, to $11.4 million at September 30, 2013 from $8.7 million at December 31, 2012. One- to four-family loans decreased $1.8 million, or 1.9%, to $93.7 million at September 30, 2013 from $95.5 million at December 31, 2012. Home equity loans decreased $320,000, or 2.1%, to $15.2 million at September 30, 2013 from $15.6 million at December 31, 2012.

25

Our total securities portfolio increased $10.4 million, or 106.6%, to $20.2 million at September 30, 2013 from $9.8 million at December 31, 2012. The growth of our securities portfolio was primarily during the quarter ended June 30, 2013, as we took advantage of the recent increase in interest rates. Purchases were comprised of residential mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises and municipal bonds and were all classified as available for sale.

Deposits increased $7.6 million, or 4.9%, to $162.0 million at September 30, 2013 from $154.4 million at December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily due to increases in certificates of deposits, NOW accounts, demand deposit and savings accounts, partially offset by a decrease in money market deposit accounts. Certificates of deposit increased a net of $4.5 million, or 10.3%, as funds gathered through the use of deposit listing services of $10.7 million were partially offset by declines in retail certificates of deposit. NOW accounts increased $4.0 million, or 13.6%, as Lawyers’ Trust Account balances increased $3.7 million, or 153.0%, reflecting loan closing funds and business interest-bearing checking accounts increased $2.7 million, or 37.0%, partially offset by a $2.3 million, or 12.2% decline in consumer. Demand deposits increased $3.6 million, or 18.5%. The increases in checking accounts reflected our continued strategic focus on generating lower-costing deposits. Savings accounts increased $1.1 million, or 9.3%. Money market accounts decreased $4.7 million, or 9.6%.

Total Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased $29.1 million, or 123.2% to $52.7 million at September 30, 2013 compared to $23.6 million at December 31, 2012. The proceeds from advances taken during the nine month period were primarily used to fund loan demand and investment security purchases and were short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances, which totaled $34.6 million with an original maturity of three-months or less and a weighted average rate of 0.17%. Management is taking advantage of the current yield curve and the expectations that short-term rates will not increase in the near-term.

Stockholders’ equity decreased $1.1 million, or 3.5% to $29.5 million at September 30, 2013. The decrease resulted primarily from the shares repurchased as part of an announced buyback program, other comprehensive loss and dividend payments, partially offset by net income of $526,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. There were 79,247 shares repurchased at a cost of $1.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Dividend payments totaled $230,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The other comprehensive loss of $440,000 reflects the change in net unrealized gains/losses on securities available for sale from a net unrealized gain of $183,000 at December 31, 2012 to a net unrealized loss of $257,000 at September 30, 2013. The unrealized losses on securities available for sale were attributable to changes in market interest rates and were not considered by management to be other than temporary at September 30, 2013.

26

Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio by type of loan as of the dates indicated.

	At					At
	September 30,					December 31,
	2013					2012
	Amount			Percent		Amount			Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential loans:
One- to four-family	$	93,736		45.17	%	$	95,546		52.54	%
Home equity loans and lines of credit	15,240			7.34		15,560			8.56
Total residential mortgage loans	108,976			52.51		111,106			61.10
Commercial loans:
One- to four-family investment property	13,017			6.27		11,355			6.25
Multi-family real estate	5,731			2.76		5,346			2.94
Commercial real estate	47,987			23.13		32,730			18.00
Commercial business	11,408			5.50		8,653			4.76
Total commercial loans	78,143			37.66		58,084			31.95
Construction loans:
One- to four-family	7,897			3.81		7,379			4.06
Multi-family	6,947			3.35		3,665			2.02
Non-residential	5,120			2.47		1,161			0.64
Total construction loans	19,964			9.63		12,205			6.72
Consumer	419			0.20		414			0.23
Total loans	207,502			100.00	%	181,809			100.00	%
Other items:
Net deferred loan costs	494					570
Allowance for loan losses	(2,096		)			(1,780		)
Total loans, net	$	205,900				$	180,599

27

Asset Quality. The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our non-performing assets at the dates indicated. Delinquent loans that are 90 days or more past due are generally considered non-performing assets.

	At September 30,			At December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual loans:
Residential mortgage loans	$	399		$	1,070
Commercial loans	—			2,105
Construction loans	—			—
Consumer	—			—
Total non-accrual loans	399			3,175
Non-performing restructured loans	—			—
Total non-performing loans	399			3,175
Real estate owned	20			203
Total non-performing assets	$	419		$	3,378
Ratios:
Non-performing loans to total loans	0.19		%	1.74		%
Non-performing assets to total assets	0.17		%	1.60		%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans	525.31		%	56.06		%

Total delinquent loans decreased $1.4 million, from $2.4 million at December 31, 2012 to $985,000 at September 30, 2013, primarily due to one commercial real estate loan totaling $1.3 million that was brought current during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Non-performing assets decreased $3.0 million to $419,000 at September 30, 2013 compared to $3.4 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease in non-performing assets was primarily due to the reclassification of a restructured loan, which has been performing in accordance with its restructured terms for the past 12 months, to accrual status. Total non-performing assets represented 0.17% of total assets at September 30, 2013 and 1.60% of total assets at December 31, 2012.

Loans classified as substandard decreased $1.7 million to $3.2 million at September 30, 2013 from $4.9 million at December 31, 2012. Included in the $3.2 million balance is one commercial real estate loan totaling $2.1 million, which has been restructured and is performing in accordance with its restructured terms. The decrease in substandard loans was due to an upgrade of one commercial real estate loan and a commercial real estate loan that paid in full.  All of these credits continue to be managed in an effort to minimize loss to the Bank.

The allowance for loan losses increased $316,000 to $2.1 million at September 30, 2013. Loan charge-offs were $137,000 and loan recoveries were $46,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to loan charge-offs of $377,000 and loan recoveries of $142,000 for the same period in 2012. The allowance represented 1.01% of total loans at September 30, 2013 and 0.98% of total loans at December 31, 2012. At these levels, the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans was 525.31% at September 30, 2013 and 56.06% at December 31, 2012.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

General. Net income decreased $76,000, or 31.1%, to $168,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to net income of $244,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in the provision for loan losses and a decrease in mortgage banking income, net, partially offset by an increase in net interest and dividend income.

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income increased $287,000, or 13.2%, to $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to increases in interest income on loans, partially offset by a decrease in interest income on short-term investments. Interest income on loans increased $248,000, or 11.9%, to $2.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, due to a $38.7 million, or 23.7%, increase in the average balance of loans, partially offset by a 49 basis point decrease in yield to 4.64% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from 5.13% for the three months ended September 30, 2012. We experienced decreases in commercial and construction loans during 2012 and added one- to four-family loans, which were originated or purchased at lower interest rates due to continued low market interest rates.

Interest and dividend income on investment securities increased $53,000, or 73.6%, to $125,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $72,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, due to a $11.3 million, or 95.8% increase in the average balance of investment securities for the three months ended September 30, 2013, partially offset by a 28 basis point decrease in yield to 2.17% for the three months ended September 30,

28

2013 from 2.45% for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Interest income on short-term investment securities decreased $14,000, or 87.5%, to $2,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $16,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, due to a $23.1 million, or 90.6% decrease in the average balance of short-term investment securities for the three months ended September 30, 2013, partially offset by a nine basis point increase in yield to 0.34% for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $90,000, or 23.7%, to $289,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $379,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. We experienced decreases in interest expense on both deposits and advances (primarily long-term FHLB advances). Interest expense on deposits decreased $44,000, or 23.2%, to $146,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $190,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, due to a decrease in rates we paid on interest-bearing deposits, as well as a decrease in the average balance of deposits. The average rate we paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased to 0.44% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 0.55% for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The average balance of interest-bearing deposits decreased $5.6 million, or 4.0%, to $131.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $137.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Interest expense on FHLB advances decreased $46,000, or 24.3%, to $143,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $189,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a 186 basis point decrease in the average rate we paid on FHLB advances to 1.16% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 3.02% for the three months ended September 30, 2012, partially offset by an increase in the average balance, which increased $24.4 million, or 97.2%, to $49.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $25.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Net Interest and Dividend Income. Net interest and dividend income increased $377,000, or 20.9%, to $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in net interest income was primarily the result of a $8.1 million or 21.3%, increase in net average interest-earning assets to $46.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $38.0 million for the same period in 2012 and by a 24 basis point increase in net interest margin to 3.83% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from 3.59% for the same period ended 2012. Our net interest margin may compress in the future due to competitive pricing in our market area.

Provision for Loan Losses. We establish provisions for loan losses, which are charged to operations, at a level necessary to absorb known and inherent losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the date of the financial statements. In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses quarterly, management analyzes several qualitative loan portfolio risk factors including but not limited to, charge-off history over a relevant period, changes in management or underwriting policies, current economic conditions, delinquency statistics, geographic and industry concentrations, the adequacy of the underlying collateral, the financial strength of the borrower and results of internal and external loan reviews. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. After an evaluation of these factors, we recorded a $244,000 provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $67,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. We recorded $5,000 in loan charge-offs and recoveries of $30,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2013. The provisions recorded resulted in an allowance for loan losses of $2.1 million, or 1.01% of total loans and 525.31% of non-performing loans at September 30, 2013, compared to an allowance for loan losses of $1.8 million, or 0.98% of total loans and 56.1% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2012.

Non-interest Income. Non-interest income decreased $375,000, or 60.9%, to $241,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $616,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, primarily due to a decrease in mortgage banking income. Mortgage banking income decreased $383,000, or 90.3%, to $41,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $424,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. We sold $5.2 million of loans during the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $22.6 million of such sales for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The loan sale volume was negatively affected by a decline in loan refinancing volume, as well as mortgage originator turnover. We intend to continue to expand the geographic footprint of our residential loan origination staff as a means to increase revenue from our mortgage banking operations. Other non-interest income included $32,000 of fees associated with commercial lines of credit facilities for the three months ended September 30, 2013. There were no such fees for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense decreased $34,000, or 1.7%, to $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Salaries and benefits expense increased $59,000, or 5.5% and included $40,000 in severance payments related to a staff reorganization. Data processing expense decreased $44,000, or 27.3% primarily due to implementation costs associated with the upgrading of software systems that were recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Advertising expense decreased $25,000, or 24.8% primarily due to a decline in costs associated with marketing campaign design. Other general and administrative expenses decreased $14,000, or 5.3%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Income Tax Expense. The income before income taxes of $251,000 resulted in income tax expense of $83,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to income before income taxes of $392,000 resulting in an income tax expense of $148,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The effective income tax rate was 33.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 37.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease in the effective rate for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2012, was primarily due to income from bank-owned life insurance, which is non-taxable income, being a larger percentage of total income during the quarter ended September 30, 2013.

29

Average Balance Sheet. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s average balance sheet for the periods indicated, including the average yields on its interest-earning assets and the average costs of its interest-bearing liabilities. Average yields are calculated by dividing the interest and dividend income produced by the average balance of interest-bearing assets. Average costs are calculated by dividing the interest expense produced by the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities. The average balances for the period are derived from average balances that are calculated daily. The average yields and costs include fees that are considered adjustments to such average yields and costs.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013						2012
	Average						Average
	Outstanding				Yield/		Outstanding				Yield/
	Balance		Interest		Rate (4)		Balance		Interest		Rate (4)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	201,890	$	2,340	4.64	%	$	163,195	$	2,092	5.13	%
Investment securities	23,036		125		2.17	%	11,768		72		2.45	%
Short-term investments	2,385		2		0.34	%	25,467		16		0.25	%
Total interest-earning assets	227,311		2,467		4.34	%	200,430		2,180		4.35	%
Non-interest-earning assets	9,469		—				9,087		—
Total assets	$	236,780	2,467				$	209,517	2,180
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings deposits	$	12,683	1		0.03	%	$	13,448	1		0.03	%
NOW accounts	29,713		12		0.16	%	22,790		13		0.23	%
Money market accounts	44,299		7		0.06	%	54,318		18		0.13	%
Certificates of deposit	45,152		126		1.12	%	46,850		158		1.35	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	131,847		146		0.44	%	137,406		190		0.55	%
FHLB advances	49,413		143		1.16	%	25,062		189		3.02	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	181,260		289		0.64	%	162,468		379		0.93	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	22,859						17,317
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities	3,166						950
Total liabilities	207,285						180,735
Stockholders’ equity	29,495						28,782
Total liabilities and equity	$	236,780					$	209,517
Net interest and dividend income			$	2,178					$	1,801
Net interest rate spread (1)					3.70	%					3.42	%
Net interest-earning assets (2)	$	46,051					$	37,962
Net interest margin (3)					3.83	%					3.59	%
Average of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities					125.41	%					123.37	%

(1)Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.

(2)Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.

(3)Net interest margin represents net interest and dividend income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

(4)Annualized.

30

Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest and dividend income for the periods indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately, based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
	Compared to the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2012
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume			Rate			Net
	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	496		$	(248	)	$	248
Investment securities	69			(16		)	53
Short-term investments	(15		)	1			(14		)
Total interest-earning assets	550			(263		)	287
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings deposits	—			—			—
NOW accounts	4			(5		)	(1		)
Money market accounts	(3		)	(8		)	(11		)
Certificates of deposit	(6		)	(26		)	(32		)
Total interest-bearing deposits	(5		)	(39		)	(44		)
FHLB advances	184			(230		)	(46		)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	179			(269		)	(90		)
Change in net interest income	$	371		$	6		$	377

31

Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

General. Net income decreased $6,000, or 1.1%, to $526,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to net income of $532,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in the provision for loan losses and an increase in non-interest expenses, partially offset by an increase in net interest and dividend income.

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income increased $196,000, or 2.9%, to $7.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to increases in interest income on loans, partially offset by a decrease in interest income on short-term investments. Interest income on loans increased $181,000, or 2.8%, to $6.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, due to a $31.4 million, or 19.5%, increase in the average balance of loans, partially offset by an 76 basis point decrease in yield to 4.64% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from 5.40% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. We experienced decreases in commercial and construction loans during 2012 and added one- to four-family loans, which were originated or purchased at lower interest rates due to continued low market interest rates.

Interest and dividend income on investment securities increased $45,000, or 20.6%, to $263,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $218,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, due to a $5.8 million, or 50.9% increase in the average balance of investment securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, partially offset by a 51 basis point decrease in yield to 2.04% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from 2.55% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in investment securities was primarily driven by asset/liability management, including the diversification of revenue sources. Interest income on short-term investment securities decreased $30,000, or 85.7%, to $5,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $35,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, due to a $21.0 million, or 90.0% decrease in the average balance of short-term investment securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, partially offset by a eight basis point increase in yield to 0.28% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $462,000, or 34.8%, to $866,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. We experienced decreases in interest expense on both deposits and advances (primarily long-term FHLB advances). Interest expense on deposits decreased $284,000, or 40.4%, to $419,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $703,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, due to a decrease in rates we paid on interest-bearing deposits, as well as a decrease in the average balance of deposits. The average rate we paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased to 0.43% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 0.68% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The average balance of interest-bearing deposits decreased $9.2 million, or 6.7%, to $128.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $137.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Interest expense on FHLB advances decreased $177,000, or 28.4%, to $447,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $624,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a 176 basis point decrease in the average rate we paid on FHLB advances to 1.56% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 3.32% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, partially offset by an increase in the average balance, which increased $13.2 million, or 52.5%, to $38.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $25.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Net Interest and Dividend Income. Net interest and dividend income increased $658,000, or 12.1%, to $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $5.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in net interest income was primarily the result of a $12.5 million, or 38.7%, increase in net average interest-earning assets to $44.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $32.2 million for the same period in 2012 and by an 13 basis point increase in net interest margin to 3.84% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from 3.71% for the same period ended 2012. Our net interest margin may compress in the future due to competitive pricing in our market area.

Provision for Loan Losses. We establish provisions for loan losses, which are charged to operations, at a level necessary to absorb known and inherent losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the date of the financial statements. In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses quarterly, management analyzes several qualitative loan portfolio risk factors including but not limited to, charge-off history over a relevant period, changes in management or underwriting policies, current economic conditions, delinquency statistics, geographic and industry concentrations, the adequacy of the underlying collateral, the financial strength of the borrower and results of internal and external loan reviews. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. After an evaluation of these factors, we recorded a $407,000 provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $162,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. We recorded $137,000 of loan charge-offs and recoveries of $46,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The provisions recorded resulted in an allowance for loan losses of $2.1 million, or 1.01% of total loans and 525.31% of non-performing loans at September 30, 2013, compared to an allowance for loan losses of $1.8 million, or 0.98% of total loans and 56.1% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2012.

Non-interest Income. Non-interest income increased $79,000, or 6.4%, to $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily due to an increase in other income. Mortgage banking income decreased $16,000, or 2.2%, to $696,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $712,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. We sold $32.3 million of loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $40.5 million of such sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The loan sale volume was negatively affected by a decline in loan refinancing volume, as well as mortgage originator turnover. We intend to continue to expand the geographic footprint of our residential loan origination staff as a means to increase

32

revenue from our mortgage banking operation. Other non-interest income included $78,000 of fees associated with commercial lines of credit facilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. There were no such fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $494,000, or 8.7%, to $6.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $5.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Salaries and benefits expense increased $401,000, or 12.7% primarily due to costs associated with additional staff and the replacement of existing staff at higher salaries and their related benefits. Data processing expense increased $59,000, or 14.5% primarily due to implementation costs associated with the upgrading of products and services offered to our customers. Professional fees increased $11,000, or 3.5% primarily due to outplacement costs associated with a staff reorganization. Advertising expense decreased $58,000, or 20.4% primarily due to a decline in costs associated with marketing campaign design. Other general and administrative expenses increased $88,000, or 11.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the costs associated with problem loans and other real estate owned ($43,000), the amortization of the annual NASDAQ listing fee ($24,000) and implementation of the Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”) requirement of the Securities and Exchange Commission ($21,000).

Income Tax Expense. The income before income taxes of $825,000 resulted in income tax expense of $299,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to income before income taxes of $827,000 resulting in an income tax expense of $295,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The effective income tax rate was 36.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 35.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

33

Average Balance Sheet. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s average balance sheet for the periods indicated, including the average yields on its interest-earning assets and the average costs of its interest-bearing liabilities. Average yields are calculated by dividing the interest and dividend income produced by the average balance of interest-bearing assets. Average costs are calculated by dividing the interest expense produced by the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities. The average balances for the period are derived from average balances that are calculated daily. The average yields and costs include fees that are considered adjustments to such average yields and costs.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013						2012
	Average						Average
	Outstanding				Yield/		Outstanding				Yield/
	Balance		Interest		Rate (4)		Balance		Interest		Rate (4)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	191,979	$	6,685	4.64	%	$	160,593	$	6,504	5.40	%
Investment securities	17,213		263		2.04	%	11,404		218		2.55	%
Short-term investments	2,345		5		0.28	%	23,353		35		0.20	%
Total interest-earning assets	211,537		6,953		4.38	%	195,350		6,757		4.61	%
Non-interest-earning assets	8,878		—				9,130		—
Total assets	$	220,415	6,953				$	204,480	6,757
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings deposits	$	12,441	2		0.02	%	$	12,777	10		0.10	%
NOW accounts	28,469		35		0.16	%	20,519		45		0.29	%
Money market accounts	45,556		21		0.06	%	58,159		169		0.39	%
Certificates of deposit	42,152		361		1.14	%	46,359		479		1.38	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	128,618		419		0.43	%	137,814		703		0.68	%
FHLB advances	38,252		447		1.56	%	25,090		624		3.32	%
Repurchase agreements	—		—		0.00	%	250		1		0.53	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	166,870		866		0.69	%	163,154		1,328		1.09	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	20,713						16,225
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities	2,823						1,881
Total liabilities	190,406						181,260
Stockholders’ equity	30,009						23,220
Total liabilities and equity	$	220,415					$	204,480
Net interest income			$	6,087					$	5,429
Net interest rate spread (1)					3.69	%					3.52	%
Net interest-earning assets (2)	$	44,667					$	32,196
Net interest margin (3)					3.84	%					3.71	%
Average of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities					126.77	%					119.73	%

(1)Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.

(2)Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.

(3)Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

(4)Annualized.

34

Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest and dividend income for the periods indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately, based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
	Compared to the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2012
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume			Rate			Net
	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	1,271		$	(1,090	)	$	181
Investment securities	111			(66		)	45
Short-term investments	(31		)	1			(30		)
Total interest-earning assets	1,351			(1,155		)	196
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings deposits	—			(8		)	(8		)
NOW accounts	17			(27		)	(10		)
Money market accounts	(37		)	(111		)	(148		)
Certificates of deposit	(43		)	(75		)	(118		)
Total interest-bearing deposits	(63		)	(221		)	(284		)
FHLB advances	327			(504		)	(177		)
Repurchase agreements	(1		)	—			(1		)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	263			(725		)	(462		)
Change in net interest income	$	1,088		$	(430	)	$	658

Liquidity Management. Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments and maturities and sales of residential loans and investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of (i) expected loan demand, (ii) expected deposit flows, (iii) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities, and (iv) the objectives of our asset/liability management program. Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest-earning deposits and short- and intermediate-term securities. The excess cash and cash equivalent balances are expected to be used to fund increases in loans and securities.

Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At September 30, 2013, cash and cash equivalents totaled $8.3 million. Securities classified as available-for-sale, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $19.0 million at September 30, 2013. Our policies also allow for access to the wholesale funds market for up to 50.0% of total assets, or $123.6 million. At September 30, 2013, we had $52.7 million in FHLB advances outstanding, $10.7 million in certificates of deposit obtained through a listing service and $596,000 in brokered certificates of deposit, allowing the Company access to an additional $59.7 million in wholesale funds based on policy guidelines.

35

At September 30, 2013 we had $14.3 million in loan commitments outstanding. In addition to commitments to originate loans, we had $34.8 million in unadvanced funds to borrowers. Related to our secondary market activities, we had $2.5 million of forward loan sale commitments at September 30, 2013. These forward loan sale commitments were used to offset the interest rate risk associated with mortgage loans, which have had their interest rate locked by our customers.

Certificates of deposit due within one year of September 30, 2013 totaled $23.9 million, or 14.8% of total deposits. If these deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit or other wholesale funding options. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other advances than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit due on or before September 30, 2014. We believe, however, based on past experience that a significant portion of our certificates of deposit will remain with us. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.

We have no material commitments or demands that are likely to affect our liquidity other than set forth below. In the event loan demand were to increase at a pace greater than expected, or any unforeseen demand or commitment were to occur, we would access our borrowing capacity with the FHLB and other wholesale market sources.

Our primary investing activities are the origination and purchase of loans and the purchase of securities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we originated $109.4 million in loans. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we purchased $13.8 million in securities. No loans were purchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Financing activities consist primarily of activity in deposit accounts, FHLB advances and the sale of residential mortgages. We experienced a net increase in total deposits of $7.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors and other factors. We generally manage the pricing of our deposits to be competitive. FHLB advances reflected a net increase of $29.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. FHLB advances have primarily been used to fund loan demand and deposit outflows. We sold $32.3 million in conforming residential mortgage loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Capital Management. The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At September 30, 2013, the Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements and is considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines.

In July 2013, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the other federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that will revise their leverage and risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Among other things, the rule establishes a new common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets), increases the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets requirement (from 4% to 6% of risk-weighted assets) and assigns a higher risk weight (150%) to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The final rule also requires unrealized gains and losses on certain “available-for-sale” securities holdings to be included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital requirements unless a one-time opt-in or opt-out is exercised. The rule limits a banking organization’s capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements.

The final rule becomes effective for the Bank on January 1, 2015. The capital conservation buffer requirement will be phased in beginning January 1, 2016 and ending January 1, 2019, when the full capital conservation buffer requirement will be effective. The final rule also implements consolidated capital requirements for savings and loan holding companies, such as the Company, effective January 1, 2015. Management is evaluating what impact, if any, these new rules will have on the operation of the Bank and/or the Company.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we engaged in no off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure (1) that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (2)  that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar

36

functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

Neither the Company nor the Bank is engaged in pending legal proceedings material to the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Other than as set forth in prior filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there have been no material changes to the Risk Factors set forth in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2013.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

a) Not applicable

b) Not applicable

c) The following table presents a summary of the Company’s share repurchases during the quarter ended September 30, 2013.

				Total Number of Shares	Maximum Number of
				Purchased as Part of	Shares That May Yet be
	Total Number of	Average Price Paid		Publicly Announced	Purchased Under the
Period	Shares Purchased	Per Share		Program (1)	Program (1)
July 1 through July 31, 2013	3,700	$	13.82	3,700	7,635
August 1 through August 31, 2013	7,635	$	14.00	7,635	0
September 1 through September 30, 2013	0	$	0.00	0	0

(1) On January 29, 2013 the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the Company intends to purchase up to approximately 4.1% of its issued and outstanding shares, or up to 79,247 shares. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had completed the announced the stock repurchase program, repurchasing a total of 79,247 shares at an average share price of $13.78.

On July 23, 2013 the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a second stock repurchase program pursuant to which the Company intends to purchase up to approximately 5.0% of its issued and outstanding shares, or up to 93,765 shares. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had not purchased any shares in accordance with the second stock repurchase program.

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5.Other Information

a)  Not applicable

b) There were no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company’s board of directors during the period covered by this Form 10-Q.

37

Item 6.Exhibits

31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

32Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

101The following financial statements from Georgetown Bancorp Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, filed on November 13, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

101.INS	Interactive datafile	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	Interactive datafile	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	Interactive datafile	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	Interactive datafile	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	Interactive datafile	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE	Interactive datafile	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

38

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	GEORGETOWN BANCORP, INC.
	(Registrant)
Date: November 13, 2013	/s/ Robert E. Balletto
	Robert E. Balletto
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 13, 2013	/s/ Joseph W. Kennedy
	Joseph W. Kennedy
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

39