Greentech Mining International 10-K/A 11 Feb 15 2013 FY Annual report (amended) Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Jul. 14, 2014
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Entity Central Index Key	1542628
Document Type	10-K
Document Period End Date	31-Mar-14
Current Fiscal Year End Date	-28
Amendment Flag	FALSE
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	No
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	No
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Public Float		$0
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		31,000,000
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013

Balance_Sheet

Balance Sheet (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Assets
Cash		$53
Total Current Assets		53
Total assets		53
Current liabilities:
Due to shareholder	104,123	104,798
Bank Overdraft	14
Total liabilities	104,137	104,798
Stockholders' Deficit:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 31,000,000 and 5,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively	4,100	3,100
Additional Paid in Capital	1,375	1,500
Accumulated deficit	-109,612	-109,345
Total stockholders' deficit	-104,137	-104,745
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)		$53

Balance_Sheet_Parenthetical

Balance Sheet (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Stockholders Equity
Preferred Stock par value	$0.00
Preferred Stock Authorized	10,000,000
Preferred Stock Issued	0
Preferred Stock Outstanding	0
Common Stock par value	$0.00
Common Stock Authorized	100,000,000
Common Stock Issued	31,000,000	5,000,000
Common Stock Outstanding	31,000,000	5,000,000

Statement_of_Operations

Statement of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended		26 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2014
Income Statement [Abstract]
Revenues
Expenses:
Operating expenses	267	107,545	109,612
General and administrative	267	107,545	109,612
Total operating expenses	267	107,545	109,612
Net loss	($267)	($107,545)	($109,612)
LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED	$0	$0
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING BASIC AND DILUTED	41,000,000	31,000,000

Shareholders_Equity

Shareholders Equity (USD $)	Common Stock	Additional Paid-In Capital	Deficit	Total
Beginning Balance - Amount at Feb. 05, 2012
Beginning Balance - Shares at Feb. 05, 2012
Issuance of Common Stock -Founders for cash - shares	5,000,000
Issuance of Common Stock -Founders for cash - amount	500	1,500	-1,800	2,000
Net loss			-1,800
Ending Balance - amount at Mar. 31, 2012	500	1,500	-1,800
Ending Balance - shares at Mar. 31, 2012	5,000,000
Tender of shares by founder, June 26, 2012 at $.0001 per share - shares	-1,500,000
Tender of shares by founder, June 26, 2012 at $.0001 per share - amount	-150
Issuance of Common Stock under consulting agreement June 27, 2012, at $.0001 per share - shares	1,000,000
Issuance of Common Stock under consulting agreement June 27, 2012, at $.0001 per share - amount	100	-100
Issuance of Common Stock under subscription agreement with Novus Aurum Trust, June 26, 2012, at $.0001 per share - shares	26,500,000
Issuance of Common Stock under subscription agreement with Novus Aurum Trust, June 26, 2012, at $.0001 per share - amount	2,650
Net loss			-107,545	-107,545
Ending Balance - amount at Mar. 31, 2013	3,100	1,500	-109,345	-104,745
Ending Balance - shares at Mar. 31, 2013	31,000,000
Issuance of Common Stock for Services, Shares	10,000,000
Issuance of Common Stock for Services, Amount	1,000	-125		875
Net loss			-267	-267
Ending Balance - amount at Mar. 31, 2014	$4,100	$1,375	($109,612)	($104,137)
Ending Balance - shares at Mar. 31, 2014	41,000,000

Shareholders_Equity_Parentheti

Shareholders Equity (Parenthetical)	Jun. 26, 2012
Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Per share value of stock for cash	0.0001

Statement_of_Cash_Flows

Statement of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended		26 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2014
Operating activities:
Net Loss	($267)	($107,545)	($109,612)
Due to shareholder		104,798
Net cash used in operating activities	-267	-2,747	-109,612
Financing Activities
Redemption of shares		-150
Due Shareholder	200		104,123
Bank Overdraft	14		14
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		2,750	5,475
Net cash provided by financing activities	214	2,600
Net increase (decrease) in cash	-267	-147
Cash at beginning of year	53	200
Cash at end of year		$53

1_ORGANIZATION_AND_SUMMARY

1 ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Development Stage Enterprises [Abstract]
ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY:	NOTE 1	- ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY:
	Greentech Mining International, Inc. (“the Company” “GMI” and “Greentech”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on February 6, 2012 under the name Accelerated Acquisitions XVIII, Inc. The Company was formed as a “shell company” with no operations while it sought new business opportunities. The Company changed its name to Greentech Mining International, Inc. on June 25, 2012. On September 17, 2012, we entered into an Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement with Greentech Mining, Inc. a Delaware Corporation and Greentech Mining Utah, LLC a Utah limited liability company, (“Owners”), both entities are under common control, pursuant to which the Company received exclusive rights that consists of all 671 acres of Section 36, Township 29 South, Range 11 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, in Wayne County, Utah upon which an operating gravimetric circuit (system to separate minerals by weight) has been built on the private property. In addition, the agreement includes four Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) mining claim groups totaling 3,940 acres to:
		a.	Exploring and prospecting for, developing, mining, excavating, leaching, milling, processing and smelting, whether by open pit, underground, strip mining, solution mining, heap leaching, or any other methods deemed desirable by the Company in its sole discretion, all minerals, ores, valuable rocks, rare earths and materials of all kinds, including mine dumps and tailings (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Contracted Substances”);
		b.	Processing, concentrating, beneficiating, treating, milling, smelting, shipping, selling and otherwise disposing of the Contracted Substances and receiving the proceeds of any such sale;
		c.	Erecting, constructing, maintaining, using and operating any such buildings, structures, machinery, facilities and equipment the Company deems necessary, except that modifications to existing structures machinery, facilities and equipment require the prior approval of the Owner; and
		d.	Engaging in any other activity that Contractor deems reasonable and necessary to achieve the foregoing purposes.
	As a result of entering into these agreements and undertaking efforts to begin exploration, mining and mineral distribution operations, we have ceased to be a shell company. The Company operates in one reportable business segment, the mining exploration and processing of precious metals.
	The Company is currently in the exploration stage. All activities of the Company to date relate to its organization and acquiring rights to explore and produce precious metals. The Company does not have any known ore reserves according to the definition of ore reserves under Industry Guide 7 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
	The Company did not recognize any assets or liabilities related to the Option Agreement signed on September 17, 2012. The Owner did not pass the ownership of the related assets until the first payment of one million dollar has been paid in the future and this has not occurred. Also, the carrying value of the Option Agreement is not an arm’s length transaction due to the fact both the Company and Owners are commonly controlled by Mr. Matthew Neher. Therefore, the carrying value of the Option Agreement cannot be determined until actual consideration has been paid.
	Mineral Properties and Milling Assets
	Mineral property and milling asset acquisition costs are recorded at cost as an aggregate amount on our condensed balance sheet and the mineral properties are deferred until the viability of the property is determined. Exploration, mineral property evaluation, option payments, related acquisition costs for mineral properties acquired under an option agreement, general overhead, administrative and holding costs to maintain a property on a care and maintenance basis are expensed in the period they are incurred. When reserves are determined for a property and a bankable feasibility study is completed, subsequent exploration and development costs on the property would be capitalized. If a project were to be put into production, capitalized costs would be depleted on the unit of production basis.
	Management reviews the net carrying value of each mineral property and milling assets as changes may materialize with an asset or at a minimum, on a quarterly basis. Where information and conditions suggest impairment under ASC 360-10-35-17, estimated future net cash flows from each asset are calculated using estimated future prices, proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, and operating, capital and reclamation costs on an undiscounted basis. If it is determined that the future cash flows are less than the carrying value, a write-down to the estimated fair value is made with a charge to loss for the period. Where estimates of future net cash flows are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, management assesses if the carrying value can be recovered. Furthermore, if the Company determines that an impairment analysis should be done, the analysis will be performed using rules of ASC 930-360-35, Asset Impairment, and 360-10-15-3 through 15-5, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
	Management's estimates of gold prices, recoverable reserves, probable outcomes, operating capital and reclamation costs are subject to risks and uncertainties that may affect the recoverability of mineral property costs.
	(b)   Emerging Growth Company
	We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden
	parachute payments not previously approved.
	Under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, “emerging growth companies” can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected not to avail ourselves to this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies.”

2_GOING_CONCERN

2 GOING CONCERN	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
GOING CONCERN	NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN
	The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the Company will realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements the Company has a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $109,612, due to shareholder of $104,123 and had $0 cash as of March 31, 2014. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing necessary for it to meet its obligations, develop the products that it has licensed, and ultimately generate revenues from the sale of these products. The Company’s founder has agreed to fund certain administrative operating expenses of the Company until the Company succeeds in raising additional funds. Management’s plans include raising additional funds through an equity financing or licensing transaction in order to meet the Company’s obligations and develop its product candidates, but funding may not be available and the Company may be unsuccessful in raising additional capital of any type. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise as a result of this uncertainty.

3_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOUNTING_POLIC

3 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Significant Accounting Policies	NOTE - 3 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
	USE OF ESTIMATES - The accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted for interim financial statement presentation and in accordance with the instructions to Regulations S-K. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statement presentation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments for a fair statement of the results and operations and financial position for the interim periods presented have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The financial information should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2014.
	CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - All cash, other than held in escrow, is maintained with a major financial institution in the United States. Deposits with this bank may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits.  Temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The Company does not have cash equivalents as of March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013.
	RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES - Expenditures for research, development, and engineering of products are expensed as incurred.
	COMMON STOCK - The Company records common stock issuances when all of the legal requirements for the issuance of such common stock have been satisfied.
	REVENUE AND COST RECOGNITION - The Company has no current source of revenue; therefore the Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding the recognition of revenue or cost.
	ADVERTISING COSTS - The Company's policy regarding advertising is to expense advertising when incurred.
	INCOME TAXES - Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences. Such temporary differences result from differences in the carrying value of assets and liabilities for tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
	The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10 "Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (ASC 740-10), on January 1, 2007. The Company has not recognized a liability as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits has not been provided since there is no unrecognized benefit since the date of adoption. The Company has not recognized interest expense or penalties as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.
	LOSS PER SHARE - Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the conversion of notes payable to common stock. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered anti-dilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation. At September 31, 2013, the Company did not have any potentially dilutive common shares.
	FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) introduced a framework for measuring fair value and expanded required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities.  The Company adopted the standard for those financial assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year and the impact of adoption was not significant. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" (ASC 820) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).  The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
		Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
		Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
		Level 3 - Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
	Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2014.
	RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
	In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive (ASU 2013-02). This guidance is the culmination of the FASB’s deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross-referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after    December 15, 2012. The Company is evaluating the effect, if any, the adoption of ASU 2013-02 will have on its financial statements. Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

4_STOCKBASED_COMPENSATION

4 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Compensation and Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION	NOTE 4 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
	The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense in its statement of operations based on estimates of the fair value of employee stock option and stock grant awards as measured on the grant date. For stock options, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the value of the awards granted. The Company amortizes the estimated value of the options as of the grant date over the stock options’ vesting period, which is generally four years.
	During the three months ended March 31, 2014 the Company did not issue any stock based compensation and for the year ended March 31, 2014 issues Accelerated Venture Partner, LLC. 1,500,000 shares of common stock at par value of .0001 per share and the Company relinquished its rights to repurchase 1,000,000 share of common stock that was issued to Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC on September 28, 2012 and issues Matthew Neher 8,500,000 shares of common stock at par value of .0001 per share for additional services rendered to the Company from June 2012 to June 2013.
	During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement under which it agreed to grant options to purchase 1,750,000 shares of common stock to its officer. Pursuant to the terms of each of the employment agreements, the options will vest over approximately four years from the date of the officer’s commenced employment and will have an exercise price of $0.0001 per share. The Company granted options to these officers at the $0.0001 per share exercise price, in part, because the employment agreements do not provide for the officers to receive any cash compensation until the Company secures at least $2 million in financing.
	The Company has estimated the value of common stock into which the options are exercisable at $.0001 per share for financial reporting purposes at par value. Greentech Mining International common stock has never traded publicly, and no stock has traded in private markets either, except for privately negotiated sales to the founders of the company and the stock-based compensation was granted when the Company had no assets and was a shell company. No common stock has been sold in any transactions since the Company emerged from its shell-company status. The Company does not have any offers for purchase of its common stock in any stage, and no stock is registered for resale with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
	The Company believes the only material estimate used in estimating the value stock options was the estimated fair value of the common stock, and that assumed volatility, term, interest rate and dividend yield changes would be not result in material differences in stock option valuations. Based on the assumed value of common stock, the grant-date fair value of options granted from February 6, 2012 (inception) through March 31, 2014 was $0.
	The Company has reserved a total of 7,500,000 shares of common stock for issuance under its stock award plan, and issued 1,750,000 as of March 31, 2014 and per our Company’s Stock Plan the plan re-triggers to 25% of the total outstanding shares on January 1, 2013, therefore as of March 31, 2014, the Company has a reserve of 7,750,000 shares of common stock for issuance under its stock award plan.

5_STOCK_AND_STOCK_TRANSACTIONS

5 STOCK AND STOCK TRANSACTIONS	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Equity [Abstract]
5 STOCK AND STOCK TRANSACTIONS	NOTE 5 - STOCK AND STOCK TRANSACTIONS
	Preferred Stock
	The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per share. The Company’s Board of Directors has the ability to determine the rights and preferences of any series of preferred stock issued. There are no shares of preferred stock currently issued or outstanding.
	Common Stock
	The Company has authorized 100,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per share.
	At inception (February 6, 2010), the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock to Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC (“AVP”) for $2,000.
	On June 26, 2012, the Company issued 26,500,000, shares of common stock to Novus Aurum Trust at par value.
	On June 26, 2012, AVP tendered 1,500,000 shares to the Company for cancellation.
	On June 27, 2012, the Company granted AVP an option to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at par value in exchange for certain consulting services, and AVP immediately exercised this option. The Company has the option to repurchase the shares exercised under the option at par value if the below milestones are not met within a specified time.
	On June 3, 2013, the Company issued Accelerated Venture Partner, LLC. 1,500,000 shares of common stock at par value of .0001 per share and the Company relinquished its rights to repurchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock that were issued to Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC on June 28, 2012 due to additional services rendered to the Company from June 2012 to June 2013.
	On June 3, 2013, The Company issued Matthew Neher 8,500,000 shares of common stock at par value of .0001 per share for additional services rendered to the Company from June 2012 to June 2013.
	As of March 31, 2014, there were 41,000,000 shares issued and outstanding and 7,500,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the Company’s Stock Option Plan and 5,500,000 of these shares remained available for future issuance as of March 31, 2014 There were 59,000,000 shares of common stock available for future issuance.

6_INCOME_TAXES

6 INCOME TAXES	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
6 INCOME TAXES	NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES
	The Company has incurred net operating losses since inception. The Company has not reflected any benefit of such net operating loss carry forward in the financial statements.
	In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income.
	Based on the level of historical taxable losses and projections of future taxable income (losses) over the periods in which the deferred tax assets can be realized, management currently believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of these deductible differences. Accordingly, the Company has provided a valuation allowance against the gross deferred tax assets.
	As of March 31, 2014, the Company had a net operating loss carry forward of approximately $109,612, which will begin to in the tax year 2028.
	Federal tax laws impose significant restrictions on the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards and research and development credits in the event of a change in ownership of the Company, as defined by the Internal Revenue Code Section 382. The Company’s net operating loss carry forwards and research and development credits may be subject to the above limitations.
	The relevant FASB standard resulted in no adjustments to the Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits. As of the date of adoption and as of March 31, 2014 there were no unrecognizable tax benefits. Accordingly, a tabular reconciliation from beginning to ending periods is not provided. The Company will classify any future interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense if incurred. To date, there have been no interest or penalties charged or accrued in relation to unrecognized tax benefits.  The Company is subject to federal and state examinations for the year 2008 forward. There are no tax examinations currently in progress.

7_OPTION_AGREEMENTS

7 OPTION AGREEMENTS	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Option Agreements	NOTE 7 - OPTION AGREEMENTS
	On September 17, 2012, we entered into an Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement (Option Agreement) with Greentech Mining, Inc. a Delaware Corporation and Greentech Mining Utah, LLC a Utah limited liability company, (“Owners”), both entities are under common control, pursuant to which the Company received exclusive rights that consists of all 671 acres of Section 36, Township 29 South, Range 11 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, in Wayne County, Utah upon which an operating gravimetric circuit (system to separate minerals by weight) has been built on the private property. In addition, the agreement includes four Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) mining claim groups totaling 3,940 acres to:
		a.	Exploring and prospecting for, developing, mining, excavating, leaching, milling, processing and smelting, whether by open pit, underground, strip mining, solution mining, heap leaching, or any other methods deemed desirable by the Company in its sole discretion, all minerals, ores, valuable rocks, rare earths and materials of all kinds, including mine dumps and tailings (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Contracted Substances”);
		b.	Processing, concentrating, beneficiating, treating, milling, smelting, shipping, selling and otherwise disposing of the Contracted Substances and receiving the proceeds of any such sale;
		c.	Erecting, constructing, maintaining, using and operating any such buildings, structures, machinery, facilities and equipment the Company deems necessary, except that modifications to existing structures machinery, facilities and equipment require the prior approval of the Owner; and
		d.	Engaging in any other activity that Contractor deems reasonable and necessary to achieve the foregoing purposes
	The term of the Option Agreement is for three (3) years from the effective date set forth above, and may be renewed by the Company for successive three (3) year periods upon substantially the same terms and provisions as set forth herein based upon the then-capital structure of the Company, until declared forfeited and canceled by Owner or relinquished by the Company, as described in Note 8. The Company shall give Owner written notice of each renewal at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the respective three-year term. The Option Agreement shall automatically renew and continue so long as ores, minerals, or metals are produced or sold from the Henry Mountain Project on a continuous basis. The Company shall have the continuing right to terminate the Option Agreement at any time and to surrender the Henry Mountain Project to Owner by giving Owner written notice thereof at least 30 days prior to the stated date of termination. Termination of the Option Agreement shall not relieve the Company of its obligation to pay all royalties due to Owner as well as its pro-rata share of taxes and fees. The Company has received a verbal agreement from the Owner to extend the payment dates in the agreement from December 1, 2012 to April 15, 2014.
	On September 22, 2012, the Company entered into a Mineral Claim Option Agreement (MCOA). Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has an option to purchase a 100% interest in certain mining claims located in the state of Arizona over twelve months, as described in Note 8. The Company was granted the exclusive and irrevocable right during the agreement and the first right of refusal on any offer received by Optionor during the first sixty days of the agreement on the property The right of first refusal or first option to purchase may only be exercised by the Company within fourteen days (14) days from notification by Optionor that Optionor’s desires to sell the subject property and Optionor is obligated to provide such notice to the company prior to offering the subject property to a third party. The Company has not exercised the option and is still evaluating the property and material.
	The Company, at its sole discretion, may abandon all interests and cease mineral exploration and extraction work on the Property at any time by providing at least 30 days written notice, the “Termination Notice”, to the Optionor. The Company shall have not further obligations to the Optionor in regards to option payments, exploration and extraction work payments as of the effective date of the “Termination Notice”.
	On May 10, 2013, Greentech Mining International, Inc. entered into an agreement with Greentech Mining, Inc. and Grenntech Mining Utah to amend payment terms of the Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement entered into on September 17, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement the parties agreed that the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars ($1,000,000) being made on or before November 1, 2012 that was previously extended to May 1, 2013 has now been extended to April 15, 2014 and the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on December 1, 2012 that was previously extended to June 1, 2013 has now been extended to November 1, 2014, the agreement is in extension negotiations as the of the date of this filing.
	On May 10, 2013, Greentech Mining International, Inc. entered into a verbal agreement with Union Gulf Resources Ltd. to amend payment terms of the Mineral Claim Option Agreement entered into on September 22, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement the parties agreed that the consideration of three million five hundred dollars ($3,500,000) with the first payment of seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) being made on December 1, 2012 that was previously extended to April 31, 2013 has been extended to April 15, 2014 and the remaining seven payments of $350,000 every three months starting March 1, 2013 previously extended to start August 1, 2013 has been extended to November 1, 2013, the agreement is in extension negotiations as the of the date of this filing and a final payment of $300,000 that was due December 1, 2014 previously extended to April 30, 2015 has been extended to August 1, 2015.

8_RELATED_PARTY_TRANSACTIONS

8 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Related Party Transactions	NOTE 8 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
	The President and majority stockholder of Greentech Mining Inc. and Greentech Mining Utah LLC is Matthew Neher, a director and CEO of the Company since June 26 2012. Mr. Neher was the principal developer of the processing plant and acquired the mining claims optioned by the Company on September 17, 2012. Matthew also controls Novus Aurum Trust the majority shareholder of the Company. From inception through December 31, 2012, the Company paid $0 cash to Matthew Neher and accrued $24,700 for expenses due to Matthew Neher and Novus Aurum Trust. See Note 4 for a description of the stock transaction involving Novus Aurum Trust and Matthew Neher. See Note 6 for a description of the Option Agreement with Greentech Mining Inc Greentech Mining Utah LLC. Also see Note 8 for a description of commitments to Greentech Mining Inc. and Greentech Mining Utah LLC under the Option Agreement.
	The Managing Partner of AVP is Timothy Neher, a director of the Company and the only officer of the Company prior to June 26, 2012. From February 6, 2012 (inception) through June 30, 2013, the Company paid $302 cash to AVP and accrued $80,098 for expenses due to AVP. See Note 4 for a description of the stock transactions involving AVP. See Note 8 for a description of commitments to AVP.
	Matthew Neher and Timothy Neher are brothers and there is a family relationship between our officers and directors.  Each director is elected at our annual meeting of stockholders and holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until his successor is elected and qualified.
	For the three months ended March 31, 2014 we had no revenue and incurred general and administrative expenses of $67. Our net loss was $109,612, due to general and administrative expenses. From February 6, 2012 (inception through March 31, 2014, general and administrative expenses consisted of $24,900 for the mining equipment and $79,223 for administrative support, which mostly consisted of document preparation for formation and EDGAR filings with the SEC. Matthew Neher, the CEO of the Company, paid the $24,700 for mining equipment and $267 in general exspenses.
	Other.
	Matthew Neher is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Greentech Mining, Inc. and Greentech Mining Utah since 2010 and 2011, respectively. Although Mr. Neher does not have employment agreements with these companies, he has received approximately $150,000 in loans (with no formal written agreement) and expense reimbursements over the last 24 months from these affiliates. Mr. Neher will receive compensation of an estimated combine total of $10,000 per months from Greentech Mining, Inc. and Greentech Mining Utah until a new CEO is indemnified and hired by these companies.The officers and directors for the Company are involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities.  If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and their other business interest.  The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.

9_COMMITMENTS_AND_CONTINGENCIE

9 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	NOTE 9 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
	On June 28, 2012, the Company entered into a Consulting Services Agreement with AVP.  The agreement requires AVP to provide the Company with certain advisory services that include reviewing the Company’s business plan, identifying and introducing prospective financial and business partners, and providing general business advice regarding the Company’s operations and business strategy. Cash compensation of $600,000 is due upon the Company securing $10 million in available cash from funding, and an additional $300,000 is due upon the Company securing $10 million in available cash from funding (inclusive of the first $5 million). The cash compensation is to be paid to AVP at the rate of $37,500 per month. The total cash compensation to be received by AVP is not to exceed $900,000 unless the Company receives an amount of funding in excess of $15 million. If the Company receives equity or debt financing that is an amount less than $10 million, in between $10 million and $15 million, or greater than $15 million, the cash compensation earned by the AVP under its consulting services agreement will be prorated. The Company has the option to make a lump sum payment to AVP in lieu of the monthly cash payments. The Company will allow the Consultant to invest up to an additional $5 million in any future debt or equity offering of the Company on the same terms and conditions offered to other participants in such offerings. The Consultant will not be obligated to participate in any such offerings. Accelerated Venture Partners has executed ten consulting agreements with public shell companies it formally controlled. Of the ten consulting services agreements, one was terminated by Accelerated Venture Partners, one is expired and the company has not elected to terminate the agreement and repurchase the consulting share. Furthermore, the remaining eight companies have either renewed consulting agreements with Accelerated Venture Partners or are under the original consulting agreement.
	On September 17, 2012, Greentech Mining International, Inc. entered into an Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement (“Option Agreement”) with Greentech Mining, Inc. a Delaware Corporation and Greentech Mining Utah, LLC a Utah limited liability company, (“Owners”), both entities are under common control. Under the terms of the Option Agreement the Company shall make payment to Owner for the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars being made on or before November 1, 2012 and the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on December 1, 2012 (note that all payments due have been verbally extended until May 1, 2013). In addition to the consideration set forth herein, Contractor shall pay Owner a Five Percent (5%) Net Smelter Royalty on all mineral bearing ores once Commercial Production has commenced. “Commercial Production” means the commercial-scale operation of any part of the Henry Mountain Project as a Mine by, or on behalf of, the Company. The Company shall perform exploration, mining, development, production, processing or any other activity (“Work” herein) which benefits the Henry Mountain Project at a minimum cost of $3,000,000 for the first year, $3,000,000 for the second year, and $3,000,000 for the third year of the Option
	Agreement. Additionally, the Owners granted to Company the sole and exclusive option to purchase all of the Owner’s rights, title and interest in the Henry Mountain Project for a total purchase price of two million dollars ($2,000,000), plus a perpetual two percent (2%) Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”). The Company has entered into a verbal agreement with the Owner to extend the payment terms that were to begin on December 1, 2012 to beginning on May 1, 2013 and the monthly payments will begin on June 1, 2013. On March 21, 2013 Greentech Mining International, Inc. enter into an agreement with Greentech Mining, Inc. and Grenntech Mining Utah to revise payment terms of the Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement entered into on September 17, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement the parties agreed that the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars ($1,000,000) being made on or before November 1, 2012 be extended to May1, 2013 and the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on December 1, 2012 be extended to June 1, 2013, the agreement is in extension negotiations as the of the date of this filing.
	The Company did not recognize any assets or liabilities related to the Option Agreement signed on September 17, 2012. The Owner did not pass the ownership of the related assets until the first payment of one million dollar has been paid in the future and this has not occurred. Also, the carrying value of the Option Agreement is not an arm’s length transaction due to the fact both the Company and Owners are commonly controlled by Mr. Matthew Neher. Therefore, the carrying value of the Option Agreement cannot be determined until actual consideration has been paid.
	On September 22, 2012, the registrant entered into a Mineral Claim Option Agreement with Union Gulf Resources Ltd. (“Optionor”). Pursuant to the agreement, the Optionor gave an option to purchase a 100% interest in certain mining claims located in the state of Arizona. In consideration of the option to purchase, Greentech Mining International, Inc. agreed to, provided that the Company has not abandoned the property, the Company will pay to the Optionor $3,500,000 US Dollars with the first payment of $750,000 on December 1, 2012, seven payments of $350,000 every three months starting March 1, 2013 and a final payment of $300,000 on December 1, 2014. The Company has entered into a verbal agreement with the Optionor to extend the payment terms that were to begin on December 1, 2012 to beginning on May 1, 2013, seven payments of $350,000 every three months starting August 1, 2013 and a final payment of $300,000 on May 1, 2015.
	Optionor granted the Company the exclusive and irrevocable right during the agreement and the first right of refusal on any offer received by Optionor during the first sixty days of the agreement on the property situated in Mohave County, Arizona. The right of first refusal or first option to purchase may only be exercised by the Company within fourteen days (14) days from notification by Optionor that Optionor’s desires to sell the subject property. Optionor is obligated to provide such notice to Company prior to offering the subject property to a third party.
	As permitted under Delaware law and in accordance with its Bylaws, Greentech Mining International indemnifies its officers and directors for certain expenses incurred from legal or other proceedings that arise as a result of the director or officer’s service to the Company. There is no limitation on the term of the indemnification and the maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited. The Company currently does not have a directors and officers insurance policy that could limit its exposure and enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.
	From time to time, the Company may be involved in claims and other legal matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Management is not currently aware of any matters that it believes are likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
	On May 10, 2013 Greentech Mining International, Inc. enter into an agreement with Greentech Mining, Inc. and Grenntech Mining Utah to amend payment terms of the Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement entered into on September 17, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement the parties agreed that the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars ($1,000,000) being made on or before November 1, 2012 that was previously extended to May 1, 2013 has now been extended to October 1, 2013 and the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on December 1, 2012 that was previously extended to June 1, 2013 has now been extended to November 1, 2013, the agreement is in extension negotiations as the of the date of this filing
	On May 10, 2013 Greentech Mining International, Inc. enter into a verbal agreement with Union Gulf Resources Ltd. to amend payment terms of the Mineral Claim Option Agreement entered into on September 22, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement the parties agreed that the consideration of three million five hundred dollars ($3,500,000) with the first payment of seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) being made on December 1, 2012 that was previously extended to April 31, 2013 has been extended to August 1, 2013 and the remaining seven payments of $350,000 every three months starting March 1, 2013 previously extended to start August 1, 2013 has been extended to November 1, 2013 and a final payment of $300,000 that was due December 1, 2014 previously extended to April 30, 2015 has been extended to August 1, 2015.
	On July 4, 2013 Greentech Mining International, Inc. entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with a commodities company incorporated under the Laws of the Federal Republic of Mexico and a project management company incorporated under the laws of Germany, collectively called “Parties”. The Parties agreed to form a joint venture company “JV Company” located in the United States to operate various mining projects as agreed upon by the Parties. Pursuant to the agreement, the commodities company provided a Bank Guarantee issued for a one year and one month period with annual renewals for a total of three years in the amount of Five Hundred Million Euros (€500,000,000) that was immediately assigned to the JV Company after the initial formation and utilized to collateralize a loan to fund the JV Company which is still on going.
	The Parties agreed that the JV Company be named Greentech Mining Ventures, Inc. and is registered in the State of Delaware, USA as a “C” corporation and Matthew J. Neher is the Chief Executive Officer and Kevin Senn is the Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of the JV Company. The Bylaws of the JV Company  specify that there shall be five members of the Board of Directors of which three shall be selected by the Greentech Mining International, Inc. one shall be selected by the commodity company and one Independent Member to be selected by the other four members. Greentech Mining International, Inc, has been elected to operate the Mining Projects for the JV Company and conduct all business affairs controlling 63% of the JV Company.
	The Parties agreed to typical representations and warranties for mining joint ventures and attests that all documents, declarations, funds and bank instruments that will be engaged are clean, clear and of non-criminal origin. Furthermore, Greentech Mining International, Inc. shall have continuing responsibility for environmental compliance of the Mining Projects and shall be solely responsible for ensuring the JV Company property and mining assets are and will remain in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws.

10_SUBSEQUENT_EVENTS

10 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
10 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
	On June 15, 2013, Greentech Mining International, Inc. terminated the Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement entered into with Greentech Mining, Inc. and Greentech Mining Utah into on September 17, 2012.  There was no disagreement between the parties and no legal action is pending between the parties.
	On June 15, 2013, Greentech Mining International, Inc. terminated the Mineral Claim Option Agreement entered into with Union Gulf Resources Ltd. into on September 22, 2012.  There was no disagreement between the parties and no legal action is pending between the parties.

3_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOUNTING_POLIC1

3 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
USE OF ESTIMATES	USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - All cash, other than held in escrow, is maintained with a major financial institution in the United States. Deposits with this bank may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits.  Temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The company does not have cash equivalents as of March 31, 2013 and 2012.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES	RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES - Expenditures for research, development, and engineering of products are expensed as incurred.
COMMON STOCK	COMMON STOCK - The Company records common stock issuances when all of the legal requirements for the issuance of such common stock have been satisfied.
REVENUE AND COST RECOGNITION	REVENUE AND COST RECOGNITION - The Company has no current source of revenue; therefore the Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding the recognition of revenue or cost.
ADVERTISING COSTS	ADVERTISING COSTS - The Company's policy regarding advertising is to expense advertising when incurred.
INCOME TAXES	INCOME TAXES - Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences. Such temporary differences result from differences in the carrying value of assets and liabilities for tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
	The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10 "Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (ASC 740-10), on January 1, 2007. The Company has not recognized a liability as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits has not been provided since there is no unrecognized benefit since the date of adoption. The Company has not recognized interest expense or penalties as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.
LOSS PER SHARE	LOSS PER SHARE - Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the conversion of notes payable to common stock. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered anti-dilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation. At December 31, 2012, the Company did not have any potentially dilutive common shares.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS	FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) introduced a framework for measuring fair value and expanded required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities.  The Company adopted the standard for those financial assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year and the impact of adoption was not significant. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" (ASC 820) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).  The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
	·	Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
	·	Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
	·	Level 3 - Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
	Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2013. These financial instruments include stock options granted to the officers in 2012.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS	RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
	Effective January 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04 represents the converged guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on fair value measurement. A variety of measures are included in the update intended to either clarify existing fair value measurement requirements, change particular principles requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend to change the application of existing requirements under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2011-04 was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
	Effective January 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 is intended to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of accounting guidance in this area with that of the IASB. The amendments require that all nonowner changes in shareholders’ equity be presented in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 (ASU 2011-12). ASU 2011-12 defers the provisions of ASU 2011-05 that require the presentation of reclassification adjustments on the face of both the statement of income and statement of other comprehensive income. Amendments under ASU 2011-05 that were not deferred under ASU 2011-12 will be applied retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
	In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2011-11). The amendments in ASU 2011-11 require the disclosure of information on offsetting and related arrangements for financial and derivative instruments to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. Amendments under ASU 2011-11 will be applied retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after January 1, 2013. The Company is evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU 2011-11 will have on its financial statements.
	In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive (ASU 2013-02). This guidance is the culmination of the FASB’s deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company is evaluating the effect, if any, the adoption of ASU 2013-02 will have on its financial statements.

6_INCOME_TAXES_Details_Narrati

6 INCOME TAXES (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
net operating loss carryforward	$109,612
net operating loss carryforward expiration	2028