| Schedule of Investments Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund Inc.†^ (Unaudited) February 29, 2024 | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| NUMBER OF SHARES | | | | VALUE | |
| | | | | | | |
| Common Stocks 80.1% | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Capital Markets 1.7% | | | | | | |
| 36,000 | CME Group Inc. | | | | $ 7,932,600 | (a) |
| | | | | | | |
| Electric Utilities 1.8% | | | | | | |
| 150,000 | NextEra Energy Inc. | | | | 8,278,500 | (a) |
| | | | | | | |
| Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers 4.9% | | | | |
| 480,000 | Clearway Energy Inc. | | | | 10,464,000 | (a) |
| 440,000 | NextEra Energy Partners LP | | | | 12,196,680 | (a) |
| | | | | | 22,660,680 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Multi-Utilities 10.1% | | | | | | |
| 860,000 | CenterPoint Energy Inc. | | | | 23,650,000 | (a) |
| 320,000 | Sempra Energy | | | | 22,592,000 | (a) |
| | | | | | 46,242,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 61.6% | | | | | |
| 840,000 | Antero Midstream Corp. | | | | 11,256,000 | (a) |
| 976,000 | Antero Resources Corp. | | | | 25,083,200 | (a)* |
| 100,000 | California Resources Corp. | | | | 5,217,000 | |
| 121,000 | Cheniere Energy Inc. | | | | 18,779,200 | (a) |
| 150,000 | Civitas Resources Inc. | | | | 10,302,000 | (a) |
| 150,000 | ConocoPhillips | | | | 16,881,000 | (a) |
| 200,000 | DT Midstream Inc. | | | | 11,526,000 | |
| 132,000 | Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | | 13,796,640 | (a) |
| 516,000 | Kinetik Holdings Inc. | | | | 18,225,120 | (a) |
| 600,000 | New Fortress Energy Inc. | | | | 21,090,000 | (a) |
| 116,000 | Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | | | 7,030,760 | (a) |
| 38,000 | ONEOK Inc. | | | | 2,854,560 | (a) |
| 64,000 | Pembina Pipeline Corp. | | | | 2,227,840 | |
| 648,000 | Targa Resources Corp. | | | | 63,659,520 | (a) |
| 350,000 | Tourmaline Oil Corp. | | | | 15,839,811 | |
| 1,100,000 | Williams Cos Inc. | | | | 39,534,000 | (a) |
| | | | | | 283,302,651 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total Common Stocks (Cost $257,952,531) | | | | 368,416,431 | |
| | | | | | | |
| NUMBER OF UNITS | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Master Limited Partnerships and Limited Partnerships 40.1% | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure 1.1% | | | | | |
| 125,000 | Cedar Fair LP | | | | 5,097,500 | (a) |
| | | | | | | |
| Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation 39.0% | | | | | |
| 4,160,000 | Energy Transfer LP | | | | 60,902,400 | (a) |
| 2,076,000 | Enterprise Products Partners LP | | | | 56,986,200 | (a) |
| 132,000 | MPLX LP | | | | 5,074,080 | (a) |
| 616,000 | NuStar Energy LP | | | | 14,549,920 | (a) |
| 1,260,000 | Western Midstream Partners LP | | | | 42,147,000 | (a)* |
| | | | | | 179,659,600 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total Master Limited Partnerships and Limited Partnerships (Cost $101,446,605) | | | 184,757,100 | |
| | | | | | | |
| NUMBER OF SHARES | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Short-Term Investments 2.5% | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Investment Companies 2.5% | | | | | |
| 11,408,791 | Invesco STIT Treasury Portfolio Money Market Fund Institutional Class, 5.24%(b) (Cost $11,408,791) | $ 11,408,791 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total Investments 122.7% (Cost $370,807,927) | | | | 564,582,322 | |
| Liabilities less other Assets (22.7)% | | | | (104,511,699) | |
| Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders 100.0% | | | | $ 460,070,623 | |
| | | | | | | |
| * Non-income producing security. | | | | | |
| (a) All or a portion of this security is pledged with the custodian in connection with the Fund's loans payable outstanding. | | |
| (b) Represents 7-day effective yield as of February 29, 2024. | | | | |
Notes to Schedule of Investments Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund Inc. (Unaudited)
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 “Fair Value Measurement” (“ASC 820”), all investments held by Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund Inc. (the “Fund”) (formerly, Neuberger Berman MLP and Energy Income Fund Inc.), are carried at the value that Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC (“Management”) believes the Fund would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment under current market conditions. Various inputs, including the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in the market, are considered in valuing the Fund’s investments, some of which are discussed below. At times, Management may need to apply significant judgement to value investments in accordance with ASC 820.
ASC 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to create a classification of value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below.
| • | Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
| • | Level 2 – other observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, amortized cost, etc.) |
| • | Level 3 – unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing an investment are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The value of the Fund’s investments in equity securities and master limited partnerships and limited partnerships, for which market quotations are available, is generally determined by Management by obtaining valuations from independent pricing services based on the latest sale price quoted on a principal exchange or market for that security (Level 1 inputs). Securities traded primarily on the NASDAQ Stock Market are normally valued at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price (“NOCP”) provided by NASDAQ each business day. The NOCP is the most recently reported price as of 4:00:02 p.m., Eastern Time, unless that price is outside the range of the “inside” bid and asked prices (i.e., the bid and asked prices that dealers quote to each other when trading for their own accounts); in that case, NASDAQ will adjust the price to equal the inside bid or asked price, whichever is closer. Because of delays in reporting trades, the NOCP may not be based on the price of the last trade to occur before the market closes. If there is no sale of a security on a particular day, the independent pricing services may value the security based on market quotations.
The value of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities is generally determined using the same valuation methods and inputs as other Fund investments, as discussed above. Foreign security prices expressed in local currency values are normally translated from the local currency into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates as of 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time on days the New York Stock Exchange is open for business. Management has approved the use of ICE Data Services (“ICE”) to assist in determining the fair value of foreign equity securities when changes in the value of a certain index suggest that the closing prices on the foreign exchanges may no longer represent the amount that the Fund could expect to receive for those securities or when foreign markets are closed and U.S. markets are open. In each of these events, ICE will provide adjusted prices for certain foreign equity securities using a statistical analysis of historical correlations of multiple factors (Level 2 inputs). In the absence of precise information about the market values of these foreign securities as of the time at which the Fund’s share price is calculated, Management has determined based on available data that prices adjusted or evaluated in this way are likely to be closer to the prices the Fund could realize on a current sale than the prices of those securities established at the close of the foreign markets in which the securities primarily trade.
Management has developed a process to periodically review information provided by independent pricing services for all types of securities.
Investments in non-exchange traded investment companies are valued using the respective fund’s daily calculated net asset value per share (Level 2 inputs), when available.
If a valuation is not available from an independent pricing service, or if Management has reason to believe that the valuation received does not represent the amount the Fund might reasonably expect to receive on a current sale in an orderly transaction, Management seeks to obtain quotations from brokers or dealers (generally considered Level 2 or Level 3 inputs depending on the number of quotes available). If such quotations are not available, the security is valued using methods Management has approved in the good-faith belief that the resulting valuation will reflect the fair value of the security. Pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Fund’s Board of Directors designated Management as the Fund’s valuation designee. As the Fund’s valuation designee, Management is responsible for determining fair value in good faith for all Fund investments. Inputs and assumptions considered in determining fair value of a security based on Level 2 or Level 3 inputs may include, but are not limited to, the type of security; the initial cost of the security; the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition; the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies; quotations or evaluated prices from broker-dealers and/or pricing services; information obtained from the issuer and analysts; an analysis of the company’s or issuer’s financial statements; an evaluation of the inputs that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
Fair value prices are necessarily estimates, and there is no assurance that such a price will be at or close to the price at which the security is next quoted or traded.
For information on the Fund’s significant accounting policies, please refer to the Fund’s most recent stockholder reports.
