Shareholder Litigation
As previously disclosed, on November 10, 2019, Menlo Therapeutics, Inc. (“Menlo”), Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (“Foamix”) and Giants Merger Subsidiary Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Menlo (“Merger Sub”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 4, 2019, as may be further amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Foamix, with Foamix surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Menlo (the “Merger”).
As previously reported in Menlo’s Registration Statement on FormS-4 (RegistrationNo. 333-235351) (the “Registration Statement”) initially filed on December 4, 2019 (as amended by Amendment No. 1, filed January 6, 2020) relating to the Merger Agreement and Menlo’s8-K filed on January 15, 2020 (the “Additional Material”), on December 11, 2019 and December 18, 2019, purported shareholders of Foamix filed putative class action lawsuits against the members of Foamix’s board of directors (the “Foamix Board”), Foamix, Menlo and Merger Sub in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, respectively, and on December 12, 2019, December 17, 2019, December 20, 2019 and January 7, 2020, purported shareholders of Foamix filed individual lawsuits against the members of the Foamix Board and Foamix. The lawsuits filed on December 12, 2019 and January 7, 2020 were filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and the lawsuits filed on December 17, 2019 and December 20, 2019 were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
On January 21, 2020, a purported shareholder of Foamix filed an individual action against Foamix and the Foamix Board in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey under the captionNam v. Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd., et al., Case No.3:20-cv-00670 (D.N.J.) (the “NamAction”). TheNamAction generally claims that the Registration Statement issued in connection with the Merger omitted material information in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. TheNamAction seeks, among other things, injunctive relief to prevent consummation of the Merger, rescission or rescissory damages in the event the Merger is consummated, a declaration that defendants violated Sections 14(a) and/or 20(a) of the Exchange Act, costs, including attorneys’ fees and such other and further relief as the court may deem just and proper. In addition, theNamAction requests an order directing the individual defendants to disseminate a proxy statement that does not contain any untrue statements of material fact and that states all material facts necessary to make the statements contained therein not misleading.
While Menlo believes that the disclosures set forth in the Registration Statement and the Additional Material comply fully with applicable law, in order to avoid nuisance, cost and distraction that may result from litigation, and to preclude any efforts to delay Foamix’s extraordinary general meeting of shareholders and closing, Menlo has determined to voluntarily amend and supplement the Registration Statement with the additional information set forth below. Nothing in this Current Report on Form8-K shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein.
Amendment to the Registration Statement
The following additional information should be read in conjunction with the Registration Statement and the Additional Material, which should be read in their entirety. To the extent that information herein differs from or updates information contained in the Registration Statement or the Additional Material, the information contained herein supersedes the information contained in the Registration Statement and the Additional Material. All page references are to pages in the Registration Statement, and terms used below, unless otherwise defined, have the meanings set forth in the Registration Statement.
The disclosure in the Registration Statement in the section “The Merger—Recommendation of the Foamix Board and Foamix’s Reasons for the Merger—Strategic Rationale” beginning on page 103 is amended as follows:
By replacing the second bullet under the heading “Strategic Rationale” on page 103 with the following:
| • | | The Foamix Board considered that the proposed merger creates a stronger, more diversified player in the dermatological space with the potential to launch three products within the next three years and the opportunities to take advantage of cost synergies related to overhead, sales, marketing, distribution and administrative functions because Foamix’s existing and planned commercial infrastructure and dermatology sales force can also support the launch of Menlo’s product candidate, if approved. Foamix’s management considered that cost savings synergies could be more than $50 million per year beginning in 2021 for the Combined Company as compared with the costs of operating the companies separately based upon the anticipated costs of each company to independently commercialize their products and product candidates, if approved. |