b. All factual representations, warranties, and statements made or agreed to by the parties to the Business Combination Agreement, the Subscription Agreement, the Sponsor Support Agreement, the SSA Amendment, the MAAC Warrant Agreement, the Trust Agreement, and the other agreements referred to in each of the foregoing (collectively, the “Agreements” and, together with the Registration Statement, the “Documents”), and in the representation letters provided to us by MAAC, Roivant and Merger Sub, are true, correct, and complete as of the date hereof and will remain true, correct, and complete through the consummation of Transactions (as defined below), in each case, without regard to any qualification as to knowledge, belief, materiality, or otherwise;
c. The descriptions of MAAC in the Registration Statement, the public filings filed in connection with MAAC’s listing on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, and MAAC’s other public filings are true, accurate, and complete;
d. The descriptions of Roivant in the Registration Statement are true, accurate, and complete;
e. The description of the Business Combination and other transactions related to the Business Combination (together, the “Transactions”) in the Registration Statement is and will remain true, accurate, and complete, the Business Combination will be consummated in accordance with such description and with the Business Combination Agreement and the other Agreements, without any waiver or breach of any material provision thereof, and the Business Combination will be effective under applicable corporate law as described in the Business Combination Agreement and the other Agreements; and
f. The Documents represent the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the Business Combination and other Transactions, there are no other written or oral agreements regarding the Transactions other than the Agreements, and none of the material terms and conditions thereof have been or will be waived or modified.
This opinion is based on current provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, and the interpretation of the Code and such regulations by the courts and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, in each case, as they are in effect and exist at the date of this opinion. It should be noted that statutes, regulations, judicial decisions, and administrative interpretations are subject to change at any time and, in some circumstances, with retroactive effect. Any change that is made after the date hereof in any of the foregoing bases for our opinion, or any inaccuracy in the facts or assumptions on which we have relied in issuing our opinion, could adversely affect our conclusion. We assume no responsibility to inform you of any such change or inaccuracy that may occur or come to our attention or to supplement or revise our opinion to reflect any legal developments or factual matters arising subsequent to the date hereof. No opinion is expressed as to any transactions in connection with the Business Combination or any matter, other than those specifically covered by this opinion. In particular, this opinion is limited to the matters discussed in the Redemption Tax Disclosure, the Merger Tax Disclosure and the Outbound Transfer Disclosure, and does not address (i) whether the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, (ii) the U.S. federal income tax treatment of any shareholder subject to special rules under the Code or the U.S. Treasury regulations, as further described in the section entitled “Material United States Tax Considerations” in the Registration Statement, (iii) the application of Section 367 of the Code to the Merger, (iv) any matter arising under the “passive foreign investment company” rules of the Code or (v) any matter arising in connection with Section 7874 of the Code. As to whether the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, because that determination is highly dependent on facts that are not yet known and will not be known until or following the Closing, including the level of redemptions of MAAC stock in connection with the Merger, and because there is an absence of guidance bearing directly on how Section 368(a) of the Code applies in the case of an acquisition of a corporation with investment-type assets, such as MAAC, we are unable to opine on whether the Merger will so qualify.