The Alabama Action: On June 28, 2017, our company removed the Alabama Action to the federal District Court for the Northern District of Alabama and the Underwriter Defendants joined in the removal. On July 14, 2017, City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System filed a Motion to Remand the Alabama Action back to state court. On August 4, 2017, our company and the Underwriter Defendants submitted a joint Motion to Change Venue, requesting the court to transfer the Alabama Action to the federal District Court for the Southern District of New York. On August 29, 2017, the court issued an order staying the proceedings of the Alabama Action pending the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver Cty. Employees Ret. Fund, and denying without prejudice City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System’s Motion to Remand and our company and the Underwriter Defendants’ Motion to Change Venue. On April 17, 2018, City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System filed a motion to lift the stay and remand the Alabama Action back to state court, which motion was granted by the court on April 18, 2018. On May 9, 2018, the plaintiff and defendants filed a joint motion to stay the Alabama Action in favor of the New York Action. The court granted that motion on August 9, 2018, and stayed the case. On June 2, 2021, the action was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.
The California Actions: On September 15, 2017, our company removed the Guo Case and McGrath Case to the federal District Court for the Northern District of California and the Underwriter Defendants consented to the removal. Also, on September 15, 2017, our company and the Underwriter Defendants filed a joint motion to transfer in the Guo Case and McGrath Case, requesting the court to transfer the two cases to the federal District Court for the Southern District of New York. On September 26, 2017, the plaintiffs filed motions to remand these two cases back to state court. On December 22, 2017, the court granted the plaintiffs’ motions to remand and denied our and the Underwriter Defendants’ joint motion to transfer. On February 15, 2018, our company and the Underwriter Defendants filed a joint motion to stay the Guo Case and the McGrath Case in state court. On April 24, 2018, the court granted our company and the Underwriter Defendants’ motion, and the stayed the case. On March 19, 2018, the Linde Foundation Case was voluntarily dismissed. On July 27, 2021, the consolidated California action was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.
The New York Action: On October 16, 2017, three sets of purported shareholders filed motions to appoint themselves as lead plaintiffs of the purported plaintiff class and appoint their designated counsel as lead counsel. On November 13, 2017, the court appointed a lead plaintiff and approved the lead plaintiff’s selection of lead counsel. On January 8, 2018, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On February 20, 2018, our company and the Underwriter Defendants filed a joint motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On July 17, 2019, the court granted the defendants’ joint motion to dismiss. On September 10, 2019, the plaintiffs moved for leave to file a second amended complaint, which our company and the Underwriter Defendants opposed. On March 31, 2021, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend. On April 1, 2021, the Court rendered judgement in favor of Defendants.
For risks and uncertainties relating to legal proceedings, please see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—We are regularly subject to claims, lawsuits and other proceedings that may adversely affect our reputation, business and results of operations.”
Dividend Policy
Our board of directors has complete discretion on whether to distribute dividends, subject to certain restrictions under Cayman Islands law. In addition, our shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our directors. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend out of either profit or share premium account, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. Even if our board of directors decides to pay dividends, the form, frequency and amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.
On March 15, 2022, the board of directors approved a special dividend of US$0.25 per ADS or share for 2021, to be paid to shareholders of record as of the close of business on April 8, 2022.
Unless otherwise disclosed in this annual report, we do not have any present plan to pay any cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain most of our available funds and any future earnings to operate and expand our business.