Semi-Annual Report
June 30, 2023
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: SGDM)
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: SGDJ)
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (Nasdaq: SETM)
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (Nasdaq: LITP)
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (Nasdaq: URNJ)
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (Nasdaq: COPJ)
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (Nasdaq: NIKL)
Table of Contents
Performance Overview
Sprott Gold ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Dear Shareholders,
This letter reviews the performance of both the Sprott Gold Miners ETF and the Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF for the six-month period ended June 30, 2023.
The Sprott Gold Miners ETF (the “Gold Fund”, NYSE Arca: SGDM) seeks investment results that correspond (before fees and expenses) to the performance of its underlying index, the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Total Return Index (ticker symbol: SOLGMCFT, the “Underlying Gold Index”). The Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (the “Junior Fund”, NYSE Arca: SGDJ) seeks investment results that correspond (before fees and expenses) to the performance of its underlying index, the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Total Return Index (ticker symbol: SOLJGMFT, the “Junior Underlying Index”).
Performance Overview
For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the Gold Fund generated a total return of 4.78%, generally in line with the performance of senior gold mining equities, as measured by the Underlying Gold Index, which gained 5.29%. The Junior Fund generated a total return of -3.47% for the period, generally in line with the performance of junior gold mining equities, as measured by the Junior Underlying Index, which declined 2.90%.
Gold Markets Overview
Gold bullion began 2023 at $1,824 per ounce, surging ~$100 in January due to a weakening U.S. dollar that started in late September 2022. Despite losing these gains in February amid rising interest rates, the gold price remained above $1,980 through most of April and May. The banking sector crisis involving Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and the Credit Suisse/UBS merger caused markets to reassess the risk of high interest rates, affecting the economic landscape and gold prices in the first quarter.
Gold reached a year-to-date high of $2,050/oz in May but receded to $1,919 by June 30, given the improved market sentiment post-March’s bank failures and postponed U.S. debt ceiling crisis. Markets now foresee easing interest rates amidst potential recession and fiscal restrictions, which could be beneficial for gold considering residual inflationary pressures.
Despite ending June on a defensive note at $1,919, the gold bullion price gained $95.33, or 5.23%, year-to-date as of June 30. Gold bullion’s strength occurred against the headwinds of surging equity markets which ended the first half up 16.89%, as measured by the S&P 500 Index. Most of this exuberance was confined to a very narrow roster of technology stocks as investors embraced AI (artificial intelligence) in a “fear of missing out” (FOMO) stampede.
Among precious metals equity markets, gold mining stocks largely followed gold trends, rising in January and dipping in February. While gold’s March breakout initially saw hesitant equity investors, the Credit Suisse/UBS merger led to a solid rise in gold mining stocks. However, Q2 erased some of Q1’s gains, indicating weakening investor sentiment toward gold mining stocks despite increased profit margins from better gold prices. Weak sentiment has caused gold mining stocks to underperform gold bullion and remain undervalued relative to broader equities.
Sprott Gold ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM)
For the six-month period ending June 30, 2023, the largest positive contributors to the Gold Miners performance were Dundee Precious Metals Inc., Torex Gold Resources Inc. and Gold Fields Ltd. The largest performance detractors were Newmont Corp., Novagold Resources Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
Performance^ (as of June 30, 2023)
| | Average Annual Total Returns |
| 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Year | Since Inception^^ |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF - Net Asset Value (“NAV”)1 | 4.78% | 7.96% | 6.87% | 1.08% |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF - Market Price2 | 4.44% | 7.84% | 6.84% | 1.07% |
Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Total Return Index3 | 5.29% | 8.93% | 7.93% | 1.96% |
S&P 500® Total Return Index | 16.89% | 19.59% | 12.31% | 11.56% |
Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Total return figures assume reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, and include the effect of the Gold Fund’s recurring expenses. The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Gold Fund distributions or the redemption of Gold Fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance data may be higher or lower than actual data quoted. For the most current month-end performance data please visit www.sprottetfs.com or call 888.622.1813.
| ^ | The Sprott Gold Miners ETF was reorganized on or about July 19, 2019 (“Reorganization Date”) from Sprott Gold Miners ETF (“Gold Predecessor Fund”), then a series of ALPS ETF Trust, into a series of Sprott Funds Trust. The Gold Fund is a continuation of the Gold Predecessor Fund and, therefore, the performance information presents the performance of the Gold Predecessor Fund prior to the Reorganization Date. Returns less than one year are not annualized. |
| ^^ | The Gold Predecessor Fund’s Commencement date was July 15, 2014. |
| 1 | The return shown is based on net asset value calculated for shareholder transactions and may differ from the return shown in the Financial Highlights, which reflects adjustments made to the net asset value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
| 2 | Market Price means the official closing price of a security or the last reported sale price. In the event there were no sales during the day or closing prices are not available, the price that is the midpoint of the bid-ask spread as of that time will be used. It does not represent the returns an investor would receive if shares were traded at other times. |
| 3 | From the Gold Fund’s inception to July 19, 2019, the Gold Fund’s objective was to track the Sprott Zacks Gold Miners Total Return Index (“predecessor index”) and since that date the Gold Fund has been seeking to track the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Total Return Index. The index performance presented reflects the performance of the predecessor index through July 19, 2019 and thereafter reflects the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Total Return Index. |
Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Total Return Index was created by Solactive AG to provide a means of generally tracking the performance of gold companies whose common stocks or American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”) are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq.
S&P 500® Total Return Index is the Standard & Poor’s composite index of 500 stocks, a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices.
The indexes are reported on a total return basis, which assumes reinvestment of any dividends and distributions realized during a given time period. The indexes are not actively managed and do not reflect any deductions for fees, expenses or taxes. One cannot invest directly in an index. Index performance does not reflect fund performance.
ALPS Distributors, Inc., a FINRA member, is the distributor for the Sprott Gold Miners ETF.
ALPS Distributors, Inc. is not affiliated with Sprott, Solactive AG nor Zacks Index Services, a division of Zacks Investment Management.
Sprott Gold ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM)
Top 10 Holdings^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Barrick Gold Corp. | 11.28% |
Franco-Nevada Corp. | 10.48% |
Agnico Eagle Mines, Ltd. | 9.70% |
Newmont Corp. | 8.19% |
Endeavour Mining PLC | 3.99% |
Torex Gold Resources, Inc. | 3.67% |
Eldorado Gold Corp. | 3.64% |
Osisko Gold Royalties, Ltd. | 3.63% |
Lundin Gold, Inc. | 3.59% |
Alamos Gold, Inc. | 3.56% |
Total % of Top 10 Holdings | 61.73% |
Country Allocation^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Canada | 70.86% |
United States | 14.10% |
South Africa | 7.51% |
Great Britain | 3.99% |
Australia | 3.54% |
Total | 100.00% |
| ^ | % of Total Investments (excluding investments purchased with collateral from securities loaned). |
Future holdings are subject to change.
Sprott Gold ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ)
For the six-month period ending June 30, 2023, the largest contributors to the Junior Fund’s performance were Sabina Gold & Silver Corp., Equinox Gold Corp. and Torex Gold Resources Inc. The largest performance detractors were Novagold Resources Inc., Perseus Mining Ltd. and West African Resources Ltd.
Performance^ (as of June 30, 2023)
| | Average Annual Total Returns |
| 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Year | Since Inception^^ |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF - Net Asset Value (“NAV”)1 | -3.47% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 2.97% |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF - Market Price2 | -3.01% | 2.17% | 0.75% | 3.04% |
Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Total Return Index3 | -2.90% | 0.46% | 1.32% | 3.77% |
S&P 500® Total Return Index | 16.89% | 19.59% | 12.31% | 11.69% |
Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Total return figures assume reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, and include the effect of the Junior Fund’s recurring expenses. The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Junior Fund distributions or the redemption of Junior Fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance data may be higher or lower than actual data quoted. For the most current month-end performance data please visit www.sprottetfs.com or call 888.622.1813.
| ^ | The Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF was reorganized on or about July 19, 2019 (“Reorganization Date”) from Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (“Junior Predecessor Fund”), then a series of ALPS ETF Trust, into a series of Sprott Funds Trust. The Junior Fund is a continuation of the Junior Predecessor Fund and, therefore, the performance information presents the performance of the Junior Predecessor Fund prior to the Reorganization Date. Returns less than one year are not annualized. |
| ^^ | The Junior Predecessor Fund’s Commencement date was March 31, 2015. |
| 1 | The return shown is based on the net asset value calculated for shareholder transactions and may differ from the return shown in the Financial Highlights, which reflects adjustments made to the net asset value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
| 2 | Market Price means the official closing price of a security or the last reported sale price. In the event there were no sales during the day or closing prices are not available, the price that is the midpoint of the bid-ask spread as of that time will be used. It does not represent the returns an investor would receive if shares were traded at other times. |
| 3 | From the Junior Fund’s inception to July 19, 2019, the Junior Fund’s objective was to track the Sprott Zacks Junior Gold Miners Total Return Index (“predecessor index”) and since that date the Junior Fund has been seeking to track the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Total Return Index. The index performance presented reflects the performance of the predecessor index through July 19, 2019 and thereafter reflects the performance of the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Total Return Index. |
Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Total Return Index was created by Solactive AG to provide a means of generally tracking the performance of “junior” gold companies whose common stock or American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”) or Global Depository Receipts (“GDRs”) are traded on a regulated stock exchange in the form of shares tradeable for foreign investors without any restrictions. Junior companies include early stage mining companies that are in the exploration stage only or that hold properties that might not ultimately produce gold. Most of these companies are in the development and exploration phase and are on the lookout for land with a higher chance for uncovering large mineral deposits.
S&P 500® Total Return Index is the Standard & Poor’s composite index of 500 stocks, a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices.
The indexes are reported on a total return basis, which assumes reinvestment of any dividends and distributions realized during a given time period. The indexes are not actively managed and do not reflect any deductions for fees, expenses or taxes. One cannot invest directly in an index. Index performance does not reflect fund performance.
ALPS Distributors, Inc., a FINRA member, is the distributor for the Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF.
ALPS Distributors, Inc. is not affiliated with Sprott, Solactive AG nor Zacks Index Services, a division of Zacks Investment Management.
Sprott Gold ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ)
Top 10 Holdings^ (as of June 30, 2023)
De Grey Mining, Ltd. | 5.25% |
OceanaGold Corp. | 5.12% |
Orla Mining, Ltd. | 5.03% |
Perseus Mining, Ltd. | 5.02% |
Centamin PLC | 5.01% |
Torex Gold Resources, Inc. | 4.89% |
Novagold Resources, Inc. | 4.51% |
Bellevue Gold, Ltd. | 4.49% |
K92 Mining, Inc. | 4.48% |
Emerald Resources NL | 4.34% |
Total % of Top 10 Holdings | 48.14% |
Country Allocation^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Australia | 52.63% |
Canada | 37.85% |
Jersey | 5.01% |
Great Britain | 3.03% |
United States | 0.77% |
Indonesia | 0.37% |
Peru | 0.34% |
Total | 100.00% |
| ^ | % of Total Investments (excluding investments purchased with collateral from securities loaned). |
Future holdings are subject to change.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Dear Shareholders,
We are pleased to present the first semi-annual report for our suite of Sprott Energy Transition ETFs, covering six funds. In the first quarter of 2023, we launched Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (Nasdaq: SETM), Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (Nasdaq: LITP), Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (Nasdaq: URNJ), Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (Nasdaq: COPJ) and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (Nasdaq: NIKL). These funds joined Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM) to establish the suite. Depending on the inception date, this letter briefly covers each Fund’s performance for the year-to-date period ending June 30, 2023.
Following a very positive January, the first half of 2023 was challenging for many critical minerals and related mining companies. Over the long term, we see positive fundamentals for the sector as the global energy transition gathers momentum. In our view, several macroeconomic and geopolitical factors are providing a positive backdrop for energy transition-related investments, including the points that follow:
Governmental Industrial Policy
Nations worldwide support net zero carbon emission goals with legislation strongly supporting the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs). In the U.S., the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 provides tax incentives for consumers and battery manufacturers while rewarding automakers for building EVs equipped with U.S.-made batteries, which will help reduce U.S. dependence on China. Similarly, the European Commission launched the European Critical Raw Minerals Act in March 2023, which incentivizes manufacturers to maintain secure and sustainable access to critical minerals.
Onshoring the Critical Mineral Supply Chain
Nations and industries are onshoring sustainable, secure supplies of critical minerals to achieve energy independence and national security in what some view as a critical minerals “arms race.” Similarly, EV batteries have emerged as the “new oil” in a reference harkening back to U.S. vulnerability to the oil embargos of the 1970s. Resilient supply chains for critical minerals and EV components are global goals for individual countries, and governments and auto manufacturers are investing in critical minerals to secure sustainable supplies.
The Dawn of a Manufacturing Supercycle
With the acceleration of EV adoption and massive investment in the energy transition, a manufacturing supercycle is emerging. In the U.S., substantial subsidies for high-tech EV plants and legislation to establish a domestic supply chain for batteries and critical materials are driving massive new investment in heavy industry, which is expected to impact the economic landscape in the coming years significantly. The influx of capital into large-scale projects for manufacturing batteries, solar cells, semiconductors and more implies sustained demand for workers and raw materials.
China’s Commodities Dominance is Likely Ending
China has been crucial in determining the shape of metals markets for the past two decades, however, its two-decades-long commodities dominance is likely ending. Since abandoning its Zero-COVID policy in November 2022, China’s economic recovery has been sluggish, negatively impacting metals pricing and demand in the first half. However, we believe China will likely be replaced by the U.S. and the European Union (EU) as the primary drivers of future metals demand.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (Nasdaq: SETM)
For the period from SETM’s inception on February 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023, SETM generated a total return of -13.62%. These results are generally in line with the performance of the miners of critical minerals, as measured by the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials™ Index (NSETM™), which declined 12.90%.
Challenges for the period included rising interest rates and macroeconomic headwinds that have impacted many capital-intensive sectors. These factors contributed to a mini-selloff across most commodities and commodity-related equities toward the end of May. By June 30, markets began to reflect a more optimistic outlook, given the likelihood of the fading probability (or delay) of a U.S. recession and the possibility that China will deliver more stimulus to help boost its faltering economy.
During the period, the largest contributors to the SETM’s performance were Cameco Corp., Allkem Limited and Liontown Resources Ltd., while the largest detractors were Lynas Rare Earths Ltd., MP Materials Corp. and Albemarle Corp.
Performance^ (as of June 30, 2023)
| Average Annual Total Returns |
| 1 Month | 3 Months | Since Inception^^ |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF - Net Asset Value (“NAV”)1 | 9.46% | 2.02% | -13.62% |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF - Market Price2 | 9.21% | 2.18% | -13.23% |
Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index3 | 9.78% | 2.19% | -12.90% |
| ^ | Returns less than one year are not annualized. |
| ^^ | Inception Date: 2/1/2023. |
| 1 | The return shown is based on net asset value calculated for shareholder transactions and may differ from the return shown in the Financial Highlights, which reflects adjustments made to the net asset value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
| 2 | Market Price means the official closing price of a security or the last reported sale price. In the event there were no sales during the day or closing prices are not available, the price that is the midpoint of the bid-ask spread as of that time will be used. It does not represent the returns an investor would receive if shares were traded at other times. |
| 3 | The Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials™ Index (NSETM™) was co-developed by Nasdaq® (the “Index Provider”) and Sprott Asset Management LP (the “Adviser”). The Index Provider and Adviser co-developed the methodology for determining the securities to be included in the Index and the Index Provider is responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the Index. The Adviser will provide certain services in connection with the Index including contributing inputs in connection with the eligibility and process to determine the initial selection and ongoing composition of the Index constituents. |
Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Total return figures assume reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, and include the effect of the Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF’s recurring expenses. The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund’s distributions or the redemption of the Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance data may be higher or lower than actual data quoted. For the most current month-end performance data please visit www.sprottetfs.com or call 888.622.1813.
The Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index is designed to track the performance of a selection of global securities in the energy transition materials industry. These Materials are critical for the energy transition from fossil fuels to cleaner energy sources and technologies, and include uranium, copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, manganese, rare earths and silver.
The index is reported on a total return basis, which assumes reinvestment of any dividends and distributions realized during a given time period. The index is not actively managed and do not reflect any deductions for fees, expenses or taxes. One cannot invest directly in an index. Index performance does not reflect fund performance.
ALPS Distributors, Inc., a FINRA member, is the distributor for the Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF.
ALPS Distributors, Inc. is not affiliated with Sprott, nor the Index Provider.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (Nasdaq: SETM)
Top 10 Holdings^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. | 5.04% |
Albemarle Corp. | 5.01% |
Pilbara Minerals, Ltd. | 4.92% |
Cameco Corp. | 4.88% |
First Quantum Minerals, Ltd. | 4.79% |
MP Materials Corp. | 4.78% |
NAC Kazatomprom JSC | 4.54% |
Lynas Rare Earths, Ltd. | 4.07% |
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA | 4.02% |
Paladin Energy, Ltd. | 3.57% |
Total % of Top 10 Holdings | 45.62% |
| ^ | % of Total Investments (excluding investments purchased with collateral from securities loaned). |
Future holdings are subject to change.
Country Allocation^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Canada | 32.60% |
Australia | 21.75% |
United States | 20.37% |
Chile | 6.70% |
Kazakhstan | 4.54% |
Malaysia | 4.07% |
China | 2.19% |
Sweden | 1.90% |
Indonesia | 1.29% |
France | 1.25% |
Poland | 1.16% |
Brazil | 0.58% |
Philippines | 0.55% |
Peru | 0.52% |
Hong Kong | 0.07% |
Great Britain | 0.30% |
Cyprus | 0.16% |
Total | 100.00% |
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (Nasdaq: LITP)
For the period from LITP’s inception on February 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023, LITP generated a total return of -7.62%. These results are generally in line with the performance of lithium miners, as measured by the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners™ Index (NSLITP™), which declined 7.16%.
At the start of the year, lithium’s spot price precipitously declined from its all-time high, but as demand for lithium grew and the global competition for secure sources increased, lithium quickly rebounded. Lithium miners were negatively affected by investor uncertainty, fueled by Chile’s plans to nationalize its lithium projects. On a positive note, lithium miners benefitted from mergers and acquisitions, increasing offtake agreements (which allow buyers to purchase lithium at a specific market price) and equity investment by automakers.
During the period, the largest contributors to the LITP’s performance were Liontown Resources Ltd., Allkem Limited and Sigma Lithium Corp. while the largest detractors were Albemarle Corp., Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA and Ganfeng Lithium Group Co. Ltd.
Performance^ (as of June 30, 2023)
| 1 Month | 3 Months | Since Inception^^ |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF - Net Asset Value (“NAV”)1 | 7.98% | 10.34% | -7.62% |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF - Market Price2 | 9.16% | 10.76% | -6.83% |
Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index3 | 8.25% | 10.11% | -7.16% |
| ^ | Returns less than one year are not annualized. |
| ^^ | Inception Date: 2/1/2023. |
| 1 | The return shown is based on net asset value calculated for shareholder transactions and may differ from the return shown in the Financial Highlights, which reflects adjustments made to the net asset value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
| 2 | Market Price means the official closing price of a security or the last reported sale price. In the event there were no sales during the day or closing prices are not available, the price that is the midpoint of the bid-ask spread as of that time will be used. It does not represent the returns an investor would receive if shares were traded at other times. |
| 3 | The Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners™ Index (NSLITP™) was co-developed by Nasdaq® (the “Index Provider”) and Sprott Asset Management LP (the “Adviser”). The Index Provider and Adviser co-developed the methodology for determining the securities to be included in the Index and the Index Provider is responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the Index. The Adviser will provide certain services in connection with the Index including contributing inputs in connection with the eligibility and process to determine the initial selection and ongoing composition of the Index constituents. |
Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Total return figures assume reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, and include the effect of the Sprott Lithium Miners ETF’s recurring expenses. The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund’s distributions or the redemption of the Sprott Lithium Miners ETF shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance data may be higher or lower than actual data quoted. For the most current month-end performance data please visit www.sprottetfs.com or call 888.622.1813.
The Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index is designed to track the performance of a selection of global securities in the lithium industry. Lithium is a raw material that is essential to the transition to a less carbon-intensive economy. This index includes major lithium producers, developers, and explorers.
The index is reported on a total return basis, which assumes reinvestment of any dividends and distributions realized during a given time period. The index is not actively managed and do not reflect any deductions for fees, expenses or taxes. One cannot invest directly in an index. Index performance does not reflect fund performance.
ALPS Distributors, Inc., a FINRA member, is the distributor for the Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
ALPS Distributors, Inc. is not affiliated with Sprott, nor the Index Provider.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (Nasdaq: LITP)
Top 10 Holdings^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Albemarle Corp. | 10.41% |
Pilbara Minerals, Ltd. | 10.31% |
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA | 10.22% |
IGO, Ltd. | 9.91% |
Livent Corp. | 8.28% |
Sigma Lithium Corp. | 4.72% |
Liontown Resources, Ltd. | 4.65% |
Mineral Resources, Ltd. | 4.57% |
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd. | 4.49% |
Lithium Americas Corp. | 4.41% |
Total % of Top 10 Holdings | 71.97% |
Country Allocation^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Australia | 43.43% |
United States | 21.39% |
Canada | 13.20% |
Chile | 10.22% |
China | 6.27% |
Brazil | 4.72% |
Great Britain | 0.50% |
Jersey | 0.27% |
Total | 100.00% |
Future holdings are subject to change.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
For the period from December 31, 2023, to June 30, 2023, URNM generated a total return of 5.82%. These results are generally in line with the performance of the uranium miners, as measured by the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index (URNMX), which generated 6.24% for the period.
Uranium mining equities posted strong results in June as markets recognized the increasingly positive fundamental picture. 2022 was the highest uranium contracting year in a decade, and contracts in the first half of 2023 were on pace to surpass this. Meanwhile, looming sanctions on Russian uranium are likely to have serious consequences for utilities in terms of security of supplies. Prior to June, uranium miners had been weighed down by rising interest rates and macroeconomic headwinds.
For the period, the largest contributors to the URNM’s performance were Cameco Corp., Boss Energy Ltd. and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust while the largest detractors were Uranium Energy Corp., NAC Kazatomprom JSC and Fission Uranium Corp.
Performance^ (as of June 30, 2023)
| | Average Annual Total Returns |
| 6 Months | 1 Year | 3 Year | Since Inception^^ |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF - Net Asset Value (“NAV”)1 | 5.82% | 17.41% | 40.67% | 35.18% |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF - Market Price2 | 5.86% | 17.71% | 39.90% | 35.17% |
Northshore Global Uranium Mining Index3 | 6.24% | 18.88% | 41.73% | 36.38% |
| ^ | The Sprott Uranium Miners ETF was reorganized on April 22, 2022 (“Reorganization Date”) from the North Shore Global Uranium Mining ETF (“Predecessor Fund”), into a series of Sprott Funds Trust. The Sprott Uranium Miners ETF is a continuation of the Predecessor Fund and, therefore, the performance information presents the performance of the Predecessor Fund prior to the Reorganization Date. Returns less than one year are not annualized. |
| ^^ | The Predecessor Fund’s Commencement date was December 3, 2019. |
| 1 | The return shown is based on the net asset value calculated for shareholder transactions and may differ from the return shown in the Financial Highlights, which reflects adjustments made to the net asset value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
| 2 | Market Price means the official closing price of a security or the last reported sale price. In the event there were no sales during the day or closing prices are not available, the price that is the midpoint of the bid-ask spread as of that time will be used. It does not represent the returns an investor would receive if shares were traded at other times. |
| 3 | From the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF’s inception to April 22, 2022, the fund’s objective was to track the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index (“predecessor index”) and since that date the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has been seeking to track the North Shore Uranium Mining Index. The index performance presented reflects the performance of the predecessor index through April 22, 2022 and thereafter reflects the performance of the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. |
Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Total return figures assume reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, and include the effect of the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF’s recurring expenses. The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund’s distributions or the redemption of the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance data may be higher or lower than actual data quoted. For the most current month-end performance data please visit www.sprottetfs.com or call 888.622.1813.
North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index is designed to track the performance of companies that devote at least 50% of their assets to the uranium mining industry, which may include mining, exploration, development, and production of uranium, or holding physical uranium, owning uranium royalties, or engaging in other, non-mining activities that support the uranium mining industry. The Index is rebalanced semi-annually.
The index is reported on a total return basis, which assumes reinvestment of any dividends and distributions realized during a given time period. The index is not actively managed and do not reflect any deductions for fees, expenses or taxes. One cannot invest directly in an index. Index performance does not reflect fund performance.
ALPS Distributors, Inc., a FINRA member, is the distributor for the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF.
ALPS Distributors, Inc. is not affiliated with Sprott, nor North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index Services.
The Uranium Fund was reorganized on April 22, 2022 from the North Shore Global Uranium Mining ETF, a series of an unaffiliated trust, into a series of Sprott Funds Trust.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
Top 10 Holdings^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Cameco Corp. | 16.56% |
NAC Kazatomprom JSC | 13.11% |
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust | 12.52% |
NexGen Energy, Ltd. | 5.25% |
Paladin Energy, Ltd. | 4.85% |
Denison Mines Corp. | 4.85% |
Energy Fuels, Inc. | 4.76% |
Boss Energy, Ltd. | 4.42% |
Yellow Cake PLC | 4.26% |
Uranium Energy Corp. | 4.24% |
Total % of Top 10 Holdings | 74.82% |
Country Allocation^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Canada | 60.18% |
Australia | 17.02% |
Kazakhstan | 13.11% |
United Kingdom | 4.26% |
China | 3.77% |
United States | 1.66% |
Total | 100.00% |
Future holdings are subject to change.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (Nasdaq: URNJ)
For the period from URNJ’s inception on February 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023, URNJ generated a total return of -15.70%. These results are generally in line with the performance of the junior uranium miners, as measured by the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners™ Index (NSURJ™), which declined by 15.21%.
Difficult market conditions tend to impact junior uranium miners more significantly than senior, or larger-capitalization miners, given their lower levels of liquidity and higher volatility. While challenges occurred early in the period, we believe the strong performance of uranium miners in June reflects the sector’s increasingly bullish fundamentals and the growing reality that future uranium supplies will have to include the junior miners, many of which are restarting mine operations and developing new mines.
During the period, the largest contributors to URNJ’s performance were Boss Energy Ltd., Berkeley Energia Ltd. and Peninsula Energy Ltd. while the largest detractors were Uranium Energy Corp., Paladin Energy Ltd. and Energy Fuels Inc.
Performance^ (as of June 30, 2023)
| Average Annual Total Returns |
| 1 Month | 3 Months | Since Inception^^ |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF - Net Asset Value (“NAV”)1 | 18.78% | 10.55% | -15.70% |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF - Market Price2 | 16.36% | 10.72% | -15.40% |
Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index3 | 18.91% | 10.63% | -15.21% |
| ^ | Returns less than one year are not annualized. |
| ^^ | Inception Date: 2/1/2023. |
| 1 | The return shown is based on net asset value calculated for shareholder transactions and may differ from the return shown in the Financial Highlights, which reflects adjustments made to the net asset value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
| 2 | Market Price means the official closing price of a security or the last reported sale price. In the event there were no sales during the day or closing prices are not available, the price that is the midpoint of the bid-ask spread as of that time will be used. It does not represent the returns an investor would receive if shares were traded at other times. |
| 3 | The Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners™ Index (NSURNJ™) was co-developed by Nasdaq® (the “Index Provider”) and Sprott Asset Management LP (the “Adviser”). The Index Provider and Adviser co-developed the methodology for determining the securities to be included in the Index and the Index Provider is responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the Index. The Adviser will provide certain services in connection with the Index including contributing inputs in connection with the eligibility and process to determine the initial selection and ongoing composition of the Index constituents. |
Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Total return figures assume reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, and include the effect of the Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF’s recurring expenses. The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund’s distributions or the redemption of the Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance data may be higher or lower than actual data quoted. For the most current month-end performance data please visit www.sprottetfs.com or call 888.622.1813.
The Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index is designed to track the performance of mid-and small market capitalization securities whose issuers are in the uranium related business.
The index is reported on a total return basis, which assumes reinvestment of any dividends and distributions realized during a given time period. The index is not actively managed and do not reflect any deductions for fees, expenses or taxes. One cannot invest directly in an index. Index performance does not reflect fund performance.
ALPS Distributors, Inc., a FINRA member, is the distributor for the Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF.
ALPS Distributors, Inc. is not affiliated with Sprott, nor the Index Provider.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (Nasdaq: URNJ)
Top 10 Holdings^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Paladin Energy, Ltd. | 12.81% |
NexGen Energy, Ltd. | 12.24% |
Uranium Energy Corp. | 12.20% |
Energy Fuels, Inc. | 10.02% |
Boss Energy, Ltd. | 4.62% |
Denison Mines Corp. | 4.60% |
Deep Yellow, Ltd. | 4.53% |
Global Atomic Corp. | 4.45% |
Encore Energy Corp. | 4.44% |
Fission Uranium Corp. | 3.71% |
Total % of Top 10 Holdings | 73.62% |
Country Allocation^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Canada | 61.39% |
Australia | 29.80% |
United States | 3.56% |
China | 3.22% |
Great Britain | 2.03% |
Total | 100.00% |
Future holdings are subject to change.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (Nasdaq: COPJ)
For the period from COPJ’s inception on February 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023, COPJ generated a total return of -5.41%. These results are generally in line with the performance of junior copper miners, as measured by the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners™ Index (NSCOPJ™), which declined by 5.58%.
Copper prices were hurt by weaker-than-expected economic data from China, which has struggled since its post-COVID reopening. However, the recent weakness in copper prices has tightened the copper market. Inventories are at a historic low as downstream industries restock, and these tightening inventories may be driving opportunities for developing miners.
For the period, the largest contributors to the COPJ’s performance were NGEx Minerals Ltd., ERO Copper Corp., and China Gold International Resources Corp., Ltd., while the largest detractors were Central Asia Metals PLC, 29Metals Ltd., and Jinchuan Group International Resources Co., Ltd.
Performance^ (as of June 30, 2023)
| 1 Month | 3 Months | Since Inception^^ |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF - Net Asset Value (“NAV”)1 | 8.95% | -0.26% | -5.41% |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF - Market Price2 | 8.38% | -0.46% | -5.21% |
Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index3 | 8.81% | -0.14% | -5.58% |
| ^ | Returns less than one year are not annualized. |
| ^^ | Inception Date: 2/1/2023. |
| 1 | The return shown is based on net asset value calculated for shareholder transactions and may differ from the return shown in the Financial Highlights, which reflects adjustments made to the net asset value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
| 2 | Market Price means the official closing price of a security or the last reported sale price. In the event there were no sales during the day or closing prices are not available, the price that is the midpoint of the bid-ask spread as of that time will be used. It does not represent the returns an investor would receive if shares were traded at other times. |
| 3 | The Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners™ Index (NSCOPJ™) was co-developed by Nasdaq® (the “Index Provider”) and Sprott Asset Management LP (the “Adviser”). The Index Provider and Adviser co-developed the methodology for determining the securities to be included in the Index and the Index Provider is responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the Index. The Adviser will provide certain services in connection with the eligibility and process to determine the initial selection and ongoing composition of the Index constituents. |
Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Total return figures assume reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, and include the effect of the Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF’s recurring expenses. The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund’s distributions or the redemption of the Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance data may be higher or lower than actual data quoted. For the most current month-end performance data please visit www.sprottetfs.com or call 888.622.1813.
The Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index is designed to track the performance of a selection of mid-and small-market capitalization securities in the copper industry. Copper is a raw material that is essential to the transition to a less carbon-intensive economy. Copper is critical for the energy transition from fossil fuels to cleaner energy sources and technologies, and for the purpose of this, the index includes producers, developers, and explorers.
The index is reported on a total return basis, which assumes reinvestment of any dividends and distributions realized during a given time period. The index is not actively managed and do not reflect any deductions for fees, expenses or taxes. One cannot invest directly in an index. Index performance does not reflect fund performance.
ALPS Distributors, Inc., a FINRA member, is the distributor for the Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF.
ALPS Distributors, Inc. is not affiliated with Sprott, nor the Index Provider.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (Nasdaq: COPJ)
Top 10 Holdings^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Filo Corp. | 5.45% |
ERO Copper Corp. | 5.32% |
Capstone Copper Corp. | 5.00% |
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. | 4.88% |
Taseko Mines, Ltd. | 4.83% |
Foran Mining Corp. | 4.74% |
Sandfire Resources, Ltd. | 4.61% |
Solaris Resources, Inc. | 4.61% |
Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. / US | 4.54% |
NGEx Minerals, Ltd. | 4.42% |
Total % of Top 10 Holdings | 48.40% |
Country Allocation^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Canada | 58.96% |
Australia | 24.06% |
Great Britain | 4.81% |
Cyprus | 4.13% |
United States | 4.59% |
Sweden | 1.81% |
Hong Kong | 1.64% |
Total | 100.00% |
Future holdings are subject to change.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (Nasdaq: NIKL)
For the period from NIKL’s inception on March 21, 2023, to June 30, 2023, NIKL generated a total return of 3.82%. These results are generally in line with the performance of the nickel miners, as measured by the Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners™ Index (NSNIKL™), which generated 4.50%.
As with copper, nickel inventories on exchanges are historically low. Nickel price volatility and low exchange inventories continue to be affected by the fallout from the nickel scandal last year on the London Metal Exchange. Nickel miners faired better than the nickel spot price due to new electric vehicle tax breaks (China) and improving market sentiment.
For the period, the largest contributors to NIKL’s performance were Azure Minerals Ltd., IGO Ltd. and Vale Indonesia Tbk PT while the largest detractors were Premium Nickel Resources Ltd., Panoramic Resources Ltd. and Nickel Industries Ltd.
Performance^ (as of June 30, 2023)
| Average Annual Total Returns |
| 1 Month | 3 Months | Since Inception^^ |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF - Net Asset Value (“NAV”)1 | 7.13% | -1.78% | 3.82% |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF - Market Price2 | 7.91% | -2.53% | 4.20% |
Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index3 | 7.69% | -1.53% | 4.50% |
| ^ | Returns less than one year are not annualized. |
| ^^ | Inception Date: 3/21/2023. |
| 1 | The return shown is based on net asset value calculated for shareholder transactions and may differ from the return shown in the Financial Highlights, which reflects adjustments made to the net asset value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
| 2 | Market Price means the official closing price of a security or the last reported sale price. In the event there were no sales during the day or closing prices are not available, the price that is the midpoint of the bid-ask spread as of that time will be used. It does not represent the returns an investor would receive if shares were traded at other times. |
| 3 | The Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners™ Index (NSNIKL™) was co-developed by Nasdaq® (the “Index Provider”) and Sprott Asset Management LP (the “Adviser”). The Index Provider and Adviser co-developed the methodology for determining the securities to be included in the Index and the Index Provider is responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the Index. The Adviser will provide certain services in connection with the Index including contributing inputs in connection with the eligibility and process to determine the initial selection and ongoing composition of the Index constituents. |
Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Total return figures assume reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, and include the effect of the Sprott Nickel Miners ETF’s recurring expenses. The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund’s distributions or the redemption of the Sprott Nickel Miners ETF shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance data may be higher or lower than actual data quoted. For the most current month-end performance data please visit www.sprottetfs.com or call 888.622.1813.
The Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index is designed to track the performance of a selection of global securities in the nickel industry. Nickel is critical for the energy transition from fossil fuels to cleaner energy sources and technologies, and for the purpose of this, index include major nickel producers, developers, and explorers.
The index is reported on a total return basis, which assumes reinvestment of any dividends and distributions realized during a given time period. The index is not actively managed and do not reflect any deductions for fees, expenses or taxes. One cannot invest directly in an index. Index performance does not reflect fund performance.
ALPS Distributors, Inc., a FINRA member, is the distributor for the Sprott Nickel Miners ETF.
ALPS Distributors, Inc. is not affiliated with Sprott, nor the Index Provider.
Sprott Energy Transition ETFs
Performance Overview | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (Nasdaq: NIKL)
Top 10 Holdings^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Nickel Industries, Ltd. | 13.47% |
IGO, Ltd. | 10.91% |
Vale Indonesia Tbk PT | 9.92% |
Azure Minerals, Ltd. | 6.28% |
Centaurus Metals, Ltd. | 5.28% |
Horizonte Minerals PLC | 4.81% |
Talon Metals Corp. | 4.52% |
Nickel Asia Corp. | 4.47% |
Sherritt International Corp. | 4.28% |
Global Ferronickel Holdings, Inc. | 4.12% |
Total % of Top 10 Holdings | 68.06% |
Country Allocation^ (as of June 30, 2023)
Australia | 49.61% |
Canada | 20.03% |
Indonesia | 11.95% |
Philippines | 8.59% |
Great Britain | 4.81% |
China | 2.93% |
France | 2.08% |
Total | 100.00% |
Future holdings are subject to change.
Sprott ETFs
Disclosure of Fund Expenses | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Shareholder Expense Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs which may include brokerage charges, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six month period and held through June 30, 2023.
Actual Return: The first line of the table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.
Hypothetical 5% Return: The second line of the table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on each Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare ongoing costs of investing in each Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
The expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight ongoing Fund costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as brokerage charges. Therefore, the second line is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| Beginning Account Value 1/1/23 | Ending Account Value 6/30/23 | Expense Ratio(a) | Expenses Paid During Period 1/1/23 - 6/30/23(b) |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | | | |
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,047.80 | 0.50% | $2.54 |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,022.32 | 0.50% | $2.51 |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | | |
Actual | $1,000.00 | $965.30 | 0.50% | $2.44 |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,022.32 | 0.50% | $2.51 |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF(c) | | | | |
Actual | $1,000.00 | $863.80 | 0.65% | $2.47 |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,017.76 | 0.65% | $2.68 |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF(c) | | | | |
Actual | $1,000.00 | $923.80 | 0.65% | $2.55 |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,017.76 | 0.65% | $2.68 |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | | |
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,058.20 | 0.83% | $4.24 |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,020.68 | 0.83% | $4.16 |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF(c) | | | | |
Actual | $1,000.00 | $843.00 | 0.80% | $3.01 |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,017.15 | 0.80% | $3.29 |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF(c) | | | | |
Actual | $1,000.00 | $945.90 | 0.75% | $2.98 |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,017.35 | 0.75% | $3.09 |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF(d) | | | | |
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,038.20 | 0.75% | $2.11 |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,011.76 | 0.75% | $2.09 |
| (a) | Annualized, based on the applicable Fund’s most recent fiscal half year expenses. |
| (b) | Expenses are equal to the applicable Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half year (181), divided by 365. |
| (c) | The Fund commenced operations on February 1, 2023. Actual expenses on this Fund are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value of the period, multiplied by the number of days since the Fund launched (149) divided by 365. Actual returns for the Fund represent the period from February 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023. |
| (d) | The Fund commenced operations on March 21, 2023. Actual expenses on this Fund are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value of the period, multiplied by the number of days since the Fund launched (101) divided by 365. Actual returns for the Fund represent the period from March 21, 2023 to June 30, 2023. |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS (99.98%) | | | | | | | | |
Gold Mining (98.76%) | | | | | | | | |
Agnico Eagle Mines, Ltd. | | | 481,154 | | | $ | 24,025,920 | |
Alamos Gold, Inc., Class A | | | 740,407 | | | | 8,819,492 | |
AngloGold Ashanti, Ltd., Sponsored ADR | | | 343,351 | | | | 7,241,273 | |
B2Gold Corp. | | | 2,425,707 | | | | 8,642,640 | |
Barrick Gold Corp. | | | 1,651,519 | | | | 27,937,755 | |
Centerra Gold, Inc. | | | 615,535 | | | | 3,689,260 | |
Coeur Mining, Inc.(a) | | | 1,010,086 | | | | 2,868,644 | |
Dundee Precious Metals, Inc. | | | 1,314,812 | | | | 8,684,359 | |
Eldorado Gold Corp.(a)(b) | | | 891,424 | | | | 9,023,586 | |
Endeavour Mining PLC(b) | | | 412,128 | | | | 9,877,384 | |
Equinox Gold Corp.(a) | | | 671,460 | | | | 3,076,627 | |
Franco-Nevada Corp. | | | 182,071 | | | | 25,949,670 | |
Gold Fields, Ltd., Sponsored ADR(b) | | | 617,636 | | | | 8,541,906 | |
Harmony Gold Mining Co., Ltd., Sponsored ADR(b) | | | 671,515 | | | | 2,820,363 | |
IAMGOLD Corp.(a)(b) | | | 1,186,410 | | | | 3,143,460 | |
K92 Mining, Inc.(a) | | | 569,577 | | | | 2,472,216 | |
Kinross Gold Corp. | | | 634,461 | | | | 3,026,830 | |
Lundin Gold, Inc. | | | 743,214 | | | | 8,892,200 | |
New Gold, Inc.(a) | | | 1,674,514 | | | | 1,820,193 | |
Newmont Corp. | | | 475,113 | | | | 20,268,321 | |
Novagold Resources, Inc.(a)(b) | | | 609,760 | | | | 2,416,486 | |
OceanaGold Corp. | | | 4,442,411 | | | | 8,752,363 | |
Osisko Gold Royalties, Ltd. | | | 584,654 | | | | 8,985,511 | |
Osisko Mining, Inc.(a) | | | 852,757 | | | | 2,072,751 | |
Royal Gold, Inc. | | | 25,840 | | | | 2,965,915 | |
Seabridge Gold, Inc.(a)(b) | | | 236,415 | | | | 2,850,008 | |
SSR Mining, Inc.(b) | | | 594,302 | | | | 8,429,466 | |
Torex Gold Resources, Inc.(a) | | | 638,721 | | | | 9,073,960 | |
Wesdome Gold Mines, Ltd.(b) | | | 1,502,033 | | | | 7,823,384 | |
Total Gold Mining | | | | | | | 244,191,943 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Silver Mining (1.22%) | | | | | | | | |
Pan American Silver Corp.(b) | | | 206,764 | | | | 3,012,301 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $229,678,659) | | | | | | | 247,204,244 | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
| | 7 Day Yield | | | Shares | | | Value | |
SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS (5.60%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money Market Fund (0.15%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
State Street Institutional Treasury Plus Money Market Fund, Premier Class | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $365,183) | | | 5.01 | % | | | 365,183 | | | | 365,183 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments Purchased with Collateral from Securities Loaned (5.45%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio, 5.11% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $13,468,354) | | | | | | | 13,468,354 | | | | 13,468,354 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $13,833,537) | | | | | | | | | | | 13,833,537 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (105.58%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $243,512,196) | | | | | | | | | | $ | 261,037,781 | |
LIABILITIES IN EXCESS OF OTHER ASSETS (-5.58%) | | | | | | | | | | | (13,800,155 | ) |
NET ASSETS (100.00%) | | | | | | | | | | $ | 247,237,626 | |
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | As of June 30, 2023, the security, or a portion of the security position was on loan. As of June 30, 2023, the total market value of securities on loan was $15,804,791. The loaned securities were secured with cash collateral of $13,468,354 and non-cash collateral with the value of $2,838,388. The non-cash collateral received consists of common stocks and is held for the benefit of the Fund at the Fund’s custodian. The Fund cannot repledge or resell this collateral. Collateral is calculated based on prior day’s prices. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | | Shares | | | | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS (100.12%) | | | | | | | | |
Copper Mining (0.37%) | | | | | | | | |
SolGold PLC(a)(b) | | | 1,729,361 | | | $ | 349,211 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diversified Metals & Mining (0.74%) | | | | | | | | |
Bumi Resources Minerals Tbk PT(a) | | | 38,376,100 | | | | 348,117 | |
Mincor Resources NL(a)(b) | | | 378,606 | | | | 353,093 | |
Total Diversified Metals & Mining | | | | | | | 701,210 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gold Mining (95.60%) | | | | | | | | |
Argonaut Gold, Inc.(a) | | | 729,148 | | | | 291,714 | |
Bellevue Gold, Ltd.(a) | | | 5,021,510 | | | | 4,248,260 | |
Capricorn Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 126,487 | | | | 339,566 | |
Centamin PLC | | | 4,099,965 | | | | 4,746,149 | |
Centerra Gold, Inc.(b) | | | 66,890 | | | | 400,911 | |
Coeur Mining, Inc.(a) | | | 109,696 | | | | 311,537 | |
De Grey Mining, Ltd.(a) | | | 5,546,282 | | | | 4,969,323 | |
Dundee Precious Metals, Inc.(b) | | | 49,333 | | | | 325,845 | |
Eldorado Gold Corp.(a)(b) | | | 102,719 | | | | 1,039,790 | |
Emerald Resources NL(a)(b) | | | 3,005,600 | | | | 4,104,479 | |
Equinox Gold Corp.(a) | | | 72,684 | | | | 333,038 | |
Firefinch, Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 6,635,363 | | | | 884,031 | |
Gold Road Resources, Ltd.(b) | | | 4,011,279 | | | | 3,968,098 | |
Greatland Gold PLC(a)(b) | | | 3,833,794 | | | | 350,563 | |
Hochschild Mining PLC | | | 355,239 | | | | 320,771 | |
K92 Mining, Inc.(a) | | | 977,953 | | | | 4,244,748 | |
Karora Resources, Inc.(a) | | | 987,205 | | | | 3,018,064 | |
McEwen Mining, Inc.(a) | | | 45,049 | | | | 323,902 | |
New Gold, Inc.(a) | | | 267,752 | | | | 291,046 | |
Novagold Resources, Inc.(a)(b) | | | 1,070,970 | | | | 4,273,170 | |
OceanaGold Corp.(b) | | | 2,462,453 | | | | 4,851,483 | |
Orla Mining, Ltd.(a) | | | 1,135,562 | | | | 4,765,974 | |
Osisko Mining, Inc.(a)(b) | | | 1,677,504 | | | | 4,077,421 | |
Pan African Resources PLC | | | 15,838,348 | | | | 2,518,366 | |
Perseus Mining, Ltd. | | | 4,327,579 | | | | 4,756,658 | |
Ramelius Resources, Ltd.(b) | | | 4,443,791 | | | | 3,729,900 | |
Red 5, Ltd.(a) | | | 3,419,352 | | | | 432,783 | |
Regis Resources, Ltd. | | | 3,171,055 | | | | 3,865,698 | |
Resolute Mining, Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 12,004,500 | | | | 3,118,758 | |
Seabridge Gold, Inc.(a)(b) | | | 328,510 | | | | 3,958,545 | |
Silver Lake Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 5,166,177 | | | | 3,321,006 | |
Skeena Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 66,564 | | | | 321,075 | |
St Barbara, Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 883,319 | | | | 282,444 | |
Tietto Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 8,890,327 | | | | 2,753,872 | |
Torex Gold Resources, Inc.(a)(b) | | | 326,062 | | | | 4,632,185 | |
Victoria Gold Corp.(a) | | | 55,190 | | | | 321,621 | |
Wesdome Gold Mines, Ltd.(b) | | | 56,266 | | | | 293,063 | |
West African Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 569,862 | | | | 328,366 | |
Westgold Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 3,309,276 | | | | 3,174,450 | |
Total Gold Mining | | | | | | | 90,288,673 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
Silver Mining (3.41%) | | | | | | | | |
Endeavour Silver Corp.(a)(b) | | | 1,107,403 | | | $ | 3,218,344 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $98,906,122) | | | | | | | 94,557,438 | |
| | | | | | | | |
RIGHTS (0.00%) | | | | | | | | |
Kinross Gold Corp. - CVR (Expiring 12/31/2049), Strike Price CAD $0.01(c) | | | 233,341 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL RIGHTS | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $–) | | | | | | | — | |
| | 7 Day Yield | | | Shares | | | Value | |
SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS (6.86%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money Market Fund (0.13%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
State Street Institutional Treasury Plus Money Market Fund, Premier Class | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $123,404) | | | 5.01 | % | | | 123,404 | | | | 123,404 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments Purchased with Collateral from Securities Loaned (6.73%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio, 5.11% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $6,353,686) | | | | | | | 6,353,686 | | | | 6,353,686 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $6,477,090) | | | | | | | | | | | 6,477,090 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (106.98%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $105,383,212) | | | | | | | | | | $ | 101,034,528 | |
LIABILITIES IN EXCESS OF OTHER ASSETS (-6.98%) | | | | | | | | | | | (6,590,849 | ) |
NET ASSETS (100.00%) | | | | | | | | | | $ | 94,443,679 | |
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | As of June 30, 2023, the security, or a portion of the security position was on loan. As of June 30, 2023, the total market value of securities on loan was $9,089,886. The loaned securities were secured with cash collateral of $6,353,686 and non-cash collateral with the value of $3,081,090. The non-cash collateral received consists of common stocks and is held for the benefit of the Fund at the Fund’s custodian. The Fund cannot repledge or resell this collateral. Collateral is calculated based on prior day’s prices. |
| (c) | As a result of the use of significant unobservable inputs to determine the fair value, the investment has been classified as Level 3 assets. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS (99.60%) | | | | | | | | |
Coal & Consumable Fuels (26.04%) | | | | | | | | |
Bannerman Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 14,120 | | | $ | 15,520 | |
Boss Energy, Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 35,638 | | | | 73,595 | |
Cameco Corp. | | | 11,830 | | | | 370,635 | |
CGN Mining Co., Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 505,000 | | | | 52,201 | |
Deep Yellow, Ltd.(a) | | | 75,656 | | | | 38,051 | |
Denison Mines Corp.(a) | | | 89,955 | | | | 112,443 | |
Encore Energy Corp.(a)(b) | | | 15,443 | | | | 37,303 | |
Energy Fuels, Inc.(a) | | | 16,982 | | | | 105,968 | |
Fission Uranium Corp.(a) | | | 67,703 | | | | 31,175 | |
NAC Kazatomprom JSC, GDR(b)(c) | | | 12,842 | | | | 344,808 | |
NexGen Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 47,140 | | | | 222,029 | |
Paladin Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 557,891 | | | | 271,297 | |
Uranium Energy Corp.(a) | | | 75,926 | | | | 258,148 | |
Uranium Royalty Corp.(a) | | | 9,170 | | | | 18,340 | |
Ur-Energy, Inc.(a) | | | 28,455 | | | | 29,878 | |
Total Coal & Consumable Fuels | | | | | | | 1,981,391 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Copper Mining (19.92%) | | | | | | | | |
Aeris Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 6,177 | | | | 1,975 | |
Antofagasta PLC | | | 10,972 | | | | 203,583 | |
Atalaya Mining PLC | | | 2,925 | | | | 11,887 | |
Capstone Copper Corp.(a)(b) | | | 14,227 | | | | 64,544 | |
Central Asia Metals PLC | | | 3,164 | | | | 7,241 | |
ERO Copper Corp.(a)(b) | | | 2,233 | | | | 45,174 | |
First Quantum Minerals, Ltd. | | | 15,381 | | | | 363,873 | |
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. | | | 9,587 | | | | 383,479 | |
Jinchuan Group International Resources Co., Ltd.(b) | | | 72,000 | | | | 3,675 | |
KGHM Polska Miedz SA | | | 3,198 | | | | 88,406 | |
Lundin Mining Corp. | | | 17,319 | | | | 135,702 | |
Sandfire Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 6,197 | | | | 24,356 | |
SolGold PLC(a)(b) | | | 28,923 | | | | 5,840 | |
Southern Copper Corp. | | | 2,274 | | | | 163,137 | |
Taseko Mines, Ltd.(a) | | | 9,047 | | | | 12,937 | |
Total Copper Mining | | | | | | | 1,515,809 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diversified Metals & Mining (35.05%) | | | | | | | | |
29Metals, Ltd. | | | 3,281 | | | | 1,847 | |
American Lithium Corp.(a) | | | 4,399 | | | | 8,833 | |
Anson Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 22,423 | | | | 2,315 | |
Arafura Rare Earths, Ltd.(a) | | | 561,702 | | | | 114,124 | |
Argosy Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 28,600 | | | | 7,430 | |
Atlantic Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 8,206 | | | | 2,605 | |
Australian Strategic Materials, Ltd.(a) | | | 39,359 | | | | 28,841 | |
Boliden AB | | | 4,995 | | | | 144,288 | |
Centaurus Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 16,708 | | | | 9,906 | |
Core Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 37,898 | | | | 22,721 | |
Critical Elements Lithium Corp.(a) | | | 4,476 | | | | 5,845 | |
Delta Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 8,101 | | | | 4,614 | |
Eramet SA | | | 1,045 | | | | 95,387 | |
Essential Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 4,340 | | | | 1,200 | |
Filo Corp.(a) | | | 1,451 | | | | 28,270 | |
Foran Mining Corp.(a) | | | 3,227 | | | | 8,574 | |
Frontier Lithium, Inc.(a) | | | 4,020 | | | | 5,675 | |
Galan Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 6,224 | | | | 3,607 | |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
Diversified Metals & Mining (continued) | | | | | | | | |
Global Atomic Corp.(a) | | | 19,713 | | | $ | 44,344 | |
Global Lithium Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 3,785 | | | | 3,933 | |
Hastings Technology Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 31,689 | | | | 28,287 | |
Horizonte Minerals PLC(a) | | | 7,334 | | | | 13,412 | |
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. | | | 4,916 | | | | 23,597 | |
IGO, Ltd. | | | 22,481 | | | | 227,631 | |
ioneer, Ltd.(a) | | | 34,656 | | | | 7,849 | |
Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. / US(a) | | | 710 | | | | 9,258 | |
Ivanhoe Mines, Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 10,116 | | | | 92,398 | |
Jervois Global, Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 171,846 | | | | 7,555 | |
Kodal Minerals PLC(a) | | | 298,124 | | | | 1,776 | |
Lake Resources NL(a)(b) | | | 28,973 | | | | 5,790 | |
Latin Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 46,462 | | | | 9,904 | |
Leo Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 16,491 | | | | 11,754 | |
Liontown Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 38,133 | | | | 71,889 | |
Lithium Americas Corp.(a) | | | 2,631 | | | | 53,173 | |
Lithium Ionic Corp.(a) | | | 2,141 | | | | 3,992 | |
Lithium Power International, Ltd.(a) | | | 9,200 | | | | 1,808 | |
Lynas Rare Earths, Ltd.(a) | | | 67,737 | | | | 309,093 | |
MMG, Ltd. | | | 53,270 | | | | 15,432 | |
MP Materials Corp.(a)(b) | | | 15,887 | | | | 363,495 | |
Neometals, Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 29,329 | | | | 9,671 | |
NGEx Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 1,143 | | | | 6,247 | |
Nickel Asia Corp. | | | 384,000 | | | | 41,600 | |
Nickel Industries, Ltd. | | | 226,155 | | | | 133,328 | |
Northern Dynasty Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 8,933 | | | | 2,144 | |
Panoramic Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 84,755 | | | | 5,194 | |
Patriot Battery Metals, Inc.(a) | | | 6,196 | | | | 7,120 | |
Piedmont Lithium, Inc.(a) | | | 342 | | | | 19,737 | |
Pilbara Minerals, Ltd.(b) | | | 114,795 | | | | 373,944 | |
Renascor Resources, Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 141,710 | | | | 17,936 | |
Sayona Mining, Ltd.(a) | | | 161,259 | | | | 18,799 | |
Sigma Lithium Corp.(a) | | | 1,087 | | | | 43,806 | |
Solaris Resources, Inc.(a) | | | 1,499 | | | | 6,699 | |
South Manganese Investment, Ltd. | | | 31,000 | | | | 1,958 | |
Standard Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 3,220 | | | | 14,490 | |
Syrah Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 56,366 | | | | 33,981 | |
Talga Group, Ltd.(a) | | | 20,080 | | | | 19,864 | |
Vale Indonesia Tbk PT | | | 232,800 | | | | 97,825 | |
Vulcan Energy Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 2,742 | | | | 7,653 | |
Winsome Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 2,785 | | | | 3,024 | |
Total Diversified Metals & Mining | | | | | | | 2,667,472 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Environmental & Facilities Services (0.98%) | | | | | | | | |
Li-Cycle Holdings Corp.(a)(b) | | | 13,423 | | | | 74,498 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Fertilizers & Agricultural Chemicals (4.02%) | | | | | | | | |
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, ADR | | | 4,209 | | | | 305,658 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gold Mining (0.80%) | | | | | | | | |
China Gold International Resources Corp., Ltd. | | | 5,700 | | | | 21,677 | |
Cia de Minas Buenaventura SAA, ADR | | | 5,364 | | | | 39,425 | |
Total Gold Mining | | | | | | | 61,102 | |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
Precious Metals & Minerals Mining (0.73%) | | | | | | | | |
Atlas Lithium Corp.(a) | | | 127 | | | $ | 2,720 | |
SilverCrest Metals, Inc.(a)(b) | | | 8,964 | | | | 52,529 | |
Total Precious Metals & Minerals Mining | | | | | | | 55,249 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Silver Mining (3.32%) | | | | | | | | |
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.(a) | | | 11,990 | | | | 76,841 | |
Endeavour Silver Corp.(a) | | | 14,288 | | | | 41,293 | |
Gatos Silver, Inc.(a) | | | 3,100 | | | | 11,718 | |
GoGold Resources, Inc.(a) | | | 18,208 | | | | 20,892 | |
MAG Silver Corp.(a) | | | 5,459 | | | | 60,813 | |
Silver Mines, Ltd.(a) | | | 78,416 | | | | 9,403 | |
Silvercorp Metals, Inc. | | | 11,181 | | | | 31,530 | |
Total Silver Mining | | | | | | | 252,490 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Specialty Chemicals (8.74%) | | | | | | | | |
Albemarle Corp. | | | 1,706 | | | | 380,592 | |
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.(b)(c)(d) | | | 11,800 | | | | 76,950 | |
Livent Corp.(a)(b) | | | 6,219 | | | | 170,587 | |
Tianqi Lithium Corp. | | | 5,400 | | | | 37,592 | |
Total Specialty Chemicals | | | | | | | 665,721 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $7,903,611) | | | | | | | 7,579,390 | |
| | | | | | | | |
EXCHANGE TRADED FUND (0.30%) | | | | | | | | |
iShares MSCI India ETF | | | 525 | | | $ | 22,943 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL EXCHANGE TRADED FUND | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $21,257) | | | | | | | 22,943 | |
| | Shares | | | Value | |
SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS (4.73%) | | | | | | | | |
Investments Purchased with Collateral from Securities Loaned (4.73%) | | | | | | | | |
State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio, 5.11% | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $360,042) | | | 360,042 | | | | 360,042 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $360,042) | | | | | | | 360,042 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (104.63%) | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $8,284,910) | | | | | | $ | 7,962,375 | |
LIABILITIES IN EXCESS OF OTHER ASSETS (-4.63%) | | | | | | | (352,284 | ) |
NET ASSETS (100.00%) | | | | | | $ | 7,610,091 | |
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | As of June 30, 2023, the security, or a portion of the security position was on loan. As of June 30, 2023, the total market value of securities on loan was $1,110,665. The loaned securities were secured with cash collateral of $360,042 and non-cash collateral with the value of $799,904. The non-cash collateral received consists of common stocks and is held for the benefit of the Fund at the Fund’s custodian. The Fund cannot repledge or resell this collateral. Collateral is calculated based on prior day’s prices. |
| (c) | Securities were purchased pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts securities offered and sold outside of the United States from registration. Such securities cannot be sold in the United States without either an effective registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, or pursuant to an exemption from registration. As of June 30, 2023, the market value of those securities was $421,758 representing 5.54% of net assets. |
| (d) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. As of June 30, 2023, the aggregate market value of those securities was $76,950, representing 1.01% of net assets. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | | Shares | | | | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS (99.88%) | | | | | | | | |
Diversified Metals & Mining (63.85%) | | | | | | | | |
American Lithium Corp.(a) | | | 19,704 | | | $ | 39,564 | |
Anson Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 95,877 | | | | 9,900 | |
Argosy Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 129,314 | | | | 33,596 | |
Arizona Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 381,508 | | | | 8,133 | |
Atlantic Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 27,510 | | | | 8,734 | |
Cleantech Lithium PLC(a) | | | 19,926 | | | | 10,629 | |
Core Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 171,733 | | | | 102,960 | |
Critical Elements Lithium Corp.(a) | | | 20,046 | | | | 26,178 | |
Delta Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 25,858 | | | | 14,728 | |
E3 Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 6,582 | | | | 11,477 | |
Essential Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 38,135 | | | | 10,543 | |
European Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 167,826 | | | | 11,180 | |
Frontier Lithium, Inc.(a) | | | 18,231 | | | | 25,735 | |
Galan Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 17,194 | | | | 9,965 | |
Global Lithium Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 11,448 | | | | 11,897 | |
Green Technology Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 23,980 | | | | 11,661 | |
IGO, Ltd. | | | 38,362 | | | | 388,435 | |
ioneer, Ltd.(a) | | | 156,527 | | | | 35,452 | |
Kodal Minerals PLC(a) | | | 1,308,266 | | | | 7,792 | |
Lake Resources NL(a)(b) | | | 131,054 | | | | 26,191 | |
Latin Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 218,449 | | | | 46,566 | |
Leo Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 74,562 | | | | 53,146 | |
Lepidico, Ltd.(a) | | | 1,526,064 | | | | 11,182 | |
Li-FT Power, Ltd.(a) | | | 3,598 | | | | 24,715 | |
Liontown Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 96,653 | | | | 182,211 | |
Lithium Americas Corp.(a) | | | 8,548 | | | | 172,755 | |
Lithium Chile, Inc.(a) | | | 18,014 | | | | 10,878 | |
Lithium Ionic Corp.(a) | | | 5,924 | | | | 11,045 | |
Lithium Power International, Ltd.(a) | | | 54,113 | | | | 10,634 | |
Mineral Resources, Ltd. | | | 3,768 | | | | 179,294 | |
Patriot Battery Metals, Inc.(a) | | | 8,533 | | | | 96,940 | |
Piedmont Lithium, Inc.(a) | | | 1,555 | | | | 89,739 | |
Pilbara Minerals, Ltd.(b) | | | 124,110 | | | | 404,286 | |
Rock Tech Lithium, Inc.(a) | | | 6,564 | | | | 10,058 | |
Savannah Resources PLC(a) | | | 199,258 | | | | 11,894 | |
Sayona Mining, Ltd.(a) | | | 731,284 | | | | 85,251 | |
Sigma Lithium Corp.(a)(b) | | | 4,587 | | | | 184,856 | |
Standard Lithium, Ltd.(a) | | | 14,676 | | | | 66,042 | |
Vulcan Energy Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 12,577 | | | | 35,105 | |
Winsome Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 10,458 | | | | 11,356 | |
Total Diversified Metals & Mining | | | | | | | 2,502,703 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Fertilizers & Agricultural Chemicals (10.22%) | | | | | | | | |
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, ADR | | | 5,518 | | | | 400,717 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gold Mining (0.56%) | | | | | | | | |
Arbor Metals Corp.(a) | | | 4,974 | | | | 11,827 | |
Brunswick Exploration, Inc.(a) | | | 17,574 | | | | 10,347 | |
Total Gold Mining | | | | | | | 22,174 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Precious Metals & Minerals (0.28%) | | | | | | | | |
Atlas Lithium Corp.(a) | | | 508 | | | | 10,881 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
Specialty Chemicals (24.97%) | | | | | | | | |
Albemarle Corp. | | | 1,830 | | | $ | 408,255 | |
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.(b)(c)(d) | | | 27,000 | | | | 176,072 | |
Livent Corp.(a)(b) | | | 11,836 | | | | 324,661 | |
Tianqi Lithium Corp. | | | 10,000 | | | | 69,615 | |
Total Specialty Chemicals | | | | | | | 978,603 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $4,012,055) | | | | | | | 3,915,078 | |
| | 7 Day Yield | | | Shares | | | Value | |
SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS (5.03%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money Market Fund (0.13%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
State Street Institutional Treasury Plus Money Market Fund, Premier Class | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $5,046) | | | 5.01 | % | | | 5,046 | | | | 5,046 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments Purchased with Collateral from Securities Loaned (4.90%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio, 5.11% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $192,008) | | | | | | | 192,008 | | | | 192,008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $197,054) | | | | | | | | | | | 197,054 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (104.91%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $4,209,109) | | | | | | | | | | $ | 4,112,132 | |
LIABILITIES IN EXCESS OF OTHER ASSETS (-4.91%) | | | | | | | | | | | (192,445 | ) |
NET ASSETS (100.00%) | | | | | | | | | | $ | 3,919,687 | |
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | As of June 30, 2023, the security, or a portion of the security position was on loan. As of June 30, 2023, the total market value of securities on loan was $823,716. The loaned securities were secured with cash collateral of $192,008 and non-cash collateral with the value of $659,566. The non-cash collateral received consists of common stocks and is held for the benefit of the Fund at the Fund’s custodian. The Fund cannot repledge or resell this collateral. Collateral is calculated based on prior day’s prices. |
| (c) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. As of June 30, 2023, the aggregate market value of those securities was $176,072, representing 4.49% of net assets. |
| (d) | Securities were purchased pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts securities offered and sold outside of the United States from registration. Such securities cannot be sold in the United States without either an effective registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, or pursuant to an exemption from registration. As of June 30, 2023, the market value of those securities was $176,072 representing 4.49% of net assets. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
CLOSED END FUND (12.51%) | | | | | | |
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust(a)(b) | | | 9,056,057 | | | $ | 114,298,753 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL CLOSED END FUND | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $107,498,517) | | | | | | | 114,298,753 | |
| | | | | | | | |
COMMON STOCKS (87.40%) | | | | | | | | |
Coal & Consumable Fuels (79.06%) | | | | | | | | |
Alligator Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 183,324,592 | | | | 4,152,146 | |
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp.(a) | | | 13,037,721 | | | | 1,525,455 | |
Aura Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 30,200,788 | | | | 4,124,252 | |
Bannerman Energy, Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 8,343,708 | | | | 9,170,987 | |
Baselode Energy Corp.(a)(c) | | | 9,656,275 | | | | 2,915,652 | |
Berkeley Energia, Ltd.(a) | | | 22,277,286 | | | | 9,902,273 | |
Boss Energy, Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 19,559,801 | | | | 40,392,352 | |
Cameco Corp.(c) | | | 4,826,413 | | | | 151,211,519 | |
CanAlaska Uranium, Ltd.(a) | | | 8,889,012 | | | | 2,147,185 | |
CGN Mining Co., Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 333,090,300 | | | | 34,431,233 | |
Deep Yellow, Ltd.(a) | | | 41,828,930 | | | | 21,037,626 | |
Denison Mines Corp.(a)(c) | | | 35,425,476 | | | | 44,281,845 | |
Elevate Uranium, Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 14,783,304 | | | | 3,052,855 | |
Encore Energy Corp.(a)(c) | | | 6,041,306 | | | | 14,593,077 | |
Energy Fuels, Inc.(a)(c) | | | 6,962,685 | | | | 43,447,154 | |
F3 Uranium Corp.(a)(c) | | | 18,287,083 | | | | 4,693,420 | |
Fission Uranium Corp.(a)(c) | | | 38,103,879 | | | | 17,545,474 | |
Forsys Metals Corp.(a)(c) | | | 10,598,225 | | | | 3,600,076 | |
GoviEx Uranium, Inc.(a)(c) | | | 35,223,226 | | | | 3,456,516 | |
IsoEnergy, Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 5,882,225 | | | | 11,589,060 | |
Laramide Resources, Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 11,599,365 | | | | 3,633,694 | |
Mega Uranium, Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 20,036,363 | | | | 2,949,304 | |
NAC Kazatomprom JSC, GDR(d) | | | 4,458,907 | | | | 119,721,653 | |
NexGen Energy, Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 10,179,901 | | | | 47,947,334 | |
Paladin Energy, Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 91,142,575 | | | | 44,321,778 | |
Peninsula Energy, Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 68,624,828 | | | | 7,771,471 | |
Skyharbour Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 8,567,756 | | | | 2,295,945 | |
Toro Energy, Ltd.(a)(c) | | | 336,535,419 | | | | 2,241,836 | |
Uranium Energy Corp.(a)(c) | | | 11,395,759 | | | | 38,745,581 | |
Uranium Royalty Corp.(a)(c) | | | 3,685,596 | | | | 7,344,762 | |
Ur-Energy, Inc.(a) | | | 13,995,786 | | | | 14,695,575 | |
Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp.(a)(c) | | | 3,807,329 | | | | 3,017,698 | |
Total Coal & Consumable Fuels | | | | | | | 721,956,788 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diversified Metals & Mining (4.09%) | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Uranium, Inc.(a)(c) | | | 5,325,298 | | | | 5,708,189 | |
Global Atomic Corp.(a) | | | 10,003,116 | | | | 22,501,820 | |
Lotus Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 74,528,598 | | | | 9,184,758 | |
Total Diversified Metals & Mining | | | | | | | 37,394,767 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Trading Companies & Distributors (4.25%) | | | | | | | | |
Yellow Cake PLC(a)(d)(e) | | | 7,482,881 | | | | 38,849,400 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $916,780,099) | | | | | | | 798,200,955 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
| | 7 Day Yield | | | Shares | | | Value | |
SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS (6.03%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money Market Fund (0.06%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
State Street Institutional Treasury Plus Money Market Fund, Premier Class | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $514,835) | | | 5.01 | % | | | 514,835 | | | $ | 514,835 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments Purchased with Collateral from Securities Loaned (5.97%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio, 5.11% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $54,573,368) | | | | | | | 54,573,368 | | | | 54,573,368 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $55,088,203) | | | | | | | | | | | 55,088,203 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (105.94%) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $1,079,366,819) | | | | | | | | | | $ | 967,587,911 | |
LIABILITIES IN EXCESS OF OTHER ASSETS (-5.94%) | | | | | | | | | | | (54,263,156 | ) |
NET ASSETS (100.00%) | | | | | | | | | | $ | 913,324,755 | |
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | Affiliate of the Fund. See table below (Affiliated Investments). |
| (c) | As of June 30, 2023, the security, or a portion of the security position is currently on loan. As of June 30, 2023, the total market value of securities on loan was $67,347,770. The loaned securities were secured with cash collateral of $54,573,368 and non-cash collateral with the value of $14,448,165. The non-cash collateral received consists of common stocks and is held for the benefit of the Fund at the Fund’s custodian. The Fund cannot repledge or resell this collateral. Collateral is calculated based on prior day’s prices. |
| (d) | Securities were purchased pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts securities offered and sold outside of the United States from registration. Such securities cannot be sold in the United States without either an effective registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, or pursuant to an exemption from registration. As of June 30, 2023, the market value of those securities was $158,571,053 representing 17.36% of net assets. |
| (e) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. As of June 30, 2023, the aggregate market value of those securities was $38,849,400, representing 4.25% of net assets. |
AFFILIATED INVESTMENTS
Security Name | | Market Value as of January 1, 2023 | | | Purchases | | | Purchases In-Kind | | | Proceeds from Sales | | | Sales In-Kind | | | Change in Unrealized Gain/(Loss) | | | Realized Gain/(Loss) | | | Market Value as of June 30, 2023 | | | Share Balance as of June 30, 2023 | |
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust | | $ | 115,816,653 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 11,034,687 | | | $ | (15,043,162 | ) | | $ | (5,421,178 | ) | | $ | 11,314,785 | | | $ | (3,403,032 | ) | | $ | 114,298,753 | | | | 9,056,057 | |
TOTAL | | $ | 115,816,653 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 11,034,687 | | | $ | (15,043,162 | ) | | $ | (5,421,178 | ) | | $ | 11,314,785 | | | $ | (3,403,032 | ) | | $ | 114,298,753 | | | | 9,056,057 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS (100.08%) | | | | | | | | |
Coal & Consumable Fuels (92.72%) | | | | | | | | |
Alligator Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 15,017,966 | | | $ | 340,144 | |
Aura Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 1,965,184 | | | | 268,368 | |
Bannerman Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 595,646 | | | | 654,704 | |
Berkeley Energia, Ltd.(a) | | | 1,702,855 | | | | 720,318 | |
Boss Energy, Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 795,653 | | | | 1,643,079 | |
CanAlaska Uranium, Ltd.(a) | | | 551,045 | | | | 133,108 | |
CGN Mining Co., Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 11,080,000 | | | | 1,145,329 | |
Deep Yellow, Ltd.(a) | | | 3,201,619 | | | | 1,610,236 | |
Denison Mines Corp.(a) | | | 1,307,047 | | | | 1,633,809 | |
Elevate Uranium, Ltd.(a) | | | 1,258,689 | | | | 259,928 | |
Encore Energy Corp.(a) | | | 653,524 | | | | 1,578,620 | |
Energy Fuels, Inc.(a) | | | 570,899 | | | | 3,562,410 | |
F3 Uranium Corp.(a) | | | 1,645,005 | | | | 422,194 | |
Fission Uranium Corp.(a) | | | 2,860,931 | | | | 1,317,356 | |
Forsys Metals Corp.(a) | | | 570,592 | | | | 193,823 | |
GoviEx Uranium, Inc.(a) | | | 3,003,544 | | | | 294,743 | |
IsoEnergy, Ltd.(a)(b) | | �� | 252,731 | | | | 497,926 | |
Laramide Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 947,634 | | | | 296,862 | |
Mega Uranium, Ltd.(a) | | | 1,643,398 | | | | 241,904 | |
NexGen Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 923,981 | | | | 4,351,951 | |
Paladin Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 9,367,569 | | | | 4,555,360 | |
Peninsula Energy, Ltd.(a) | | | 5,743,220 | | | | 650,395 | |
Skyharbour Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 711,108 | | | | 190,559 | |
Uranium Energy Corp.(a) | | | 1,275,160 | | | | 4,335,544 | |
Uranium Royalty Corp.(a) | | | 386,287 | | | | 772,574 | |
Ur-Energy, Inc.(a) | | | 1,206,420 | | | | 1,266,741 | |
Total Coal & Consumable Fuels | | | | | | | 32,937,985 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diversified Metals & Mining (7.36%) | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Uranium, Inc.(a) | | | 390,743 | | | | 418,838 | |
Global Atomic Corp.(a) | | | 703,086 | | | | 1,581,579 | |
Lotus Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 4,973,698 | | | | 612,949 | |
Total Diversified Metals & Mining | | | | | | | 2,613,366 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (Cost $34,885,212) | | | | | | | 35,551,351 | |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
| | Shares | | | Value | |
SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS (4.35%) | | | | | | | | |
Investments Purchased with Collateral from Securities Loaned (4.35%) | | | | | | | | |
State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio, 5.11% | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $1,543,446) | | | 1,543,446 | | | | 1,543,446 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS (Cost $1,543,446) | | | | | | | 1,543,446 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (104.43%) (Cost $36,428,658) | | | | | | $ | 37,094,797 | |
LIABILITIES IN EXCESS OF OTHER ASSETS (-4.43%) | | | | | | | (1,573,188 | ) |
NET ASSETS (100.00%) | | | | | | $ | 35,521,609 | |
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | As of June 30, 2023, the security, or a portion of the security position was on loan. As of June 30, 2023, the total market value of securities on loan was $2,011,978. The loaned securities were secured with cash collateral of $1,543,446 and non-cash collateral with the value of $604,770. The non-cash collateral received consists of common stocks and is held for the benefit of the Fund at the Fund’s custodian. The Fund cannot repledge or resell this collateral. Collateral is calculated based on prior day’s prices. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS (96.55%) | | | | | | | | |
Copper Mining (41.18%) | | | | | | | | |
Aeris Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 114,925 | | | $ | 36,748 | |
Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.(a) | | | 23,077 | | | | 29,091 | |
Atalaya Mining PLC | | | 27,400 | | | | 111,354 | |
Austral Resources Australia, Ltd.(a) | | | 48,312 | | | | 6,437 | |
Capstone Copper Corp.(a)(b) | | | 29,709 | | | | 134,781 | |
Central Asia Metals PLC | | | 50,768 | | | | 116,185 | |
Cyprium Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 197,874 | | | | 14,500 | |
ERO Copper Corp.(a)(b) | | | 7,089 | | | | 143,411 | |
Faraday Copper Corp.(a) | | | 55,000 | | | | 31,553 | |
Greenex Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 69,700 | | | | 52,002 | |
Hot Chili, Ltd.(a) | | | 34,108 | | | | 25,448 | |
Jinchuan Group International Resources Co., Ltd.(b) | | | 863,000 | | | | 44,053 | |
Sandfire Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 31,574 | | | | 124,095 | |
SolGold PLC(a)(b) | | | 540,097 | | | | 109,062 | |
Taseko Mines, Ltd.(a) | | | 91,098 | | | | 130,270 | |
Total Copper Mining | | | | | | | 1,108,990 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diversified Metals & Mining (51.19%) | | | | | | | | |
29Metals, Ltd. | | | 42,336 | | | | 23,831 | |
AIC Mines, Ltd.(a) | | | 101,479 | | | | 27,716 | |
Amerigo Resources, Ltd. | | | 37,377 | | | | 43,450 | |
Arc Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 361,477 | | | | 13,313 | |
Caravel Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 126,300 | | | | 19,351 | |
Copperstone Resources AB(a) | | | 443,356 | | | | 48,835 | |
Encounter Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 106,733 | | | | 32,351 | |
Entree Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 31,358 | | | | 27,222 | |
Filo Corp.(a) | | | 7,543 | | | | 146,959 | |
Foran Mining Corp.(a) | | | 48,084 | | | | 127,764 | |
Hillgrove Resources, Ltd. | | | 428,200 | | | | 16,544 | |
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. | | | 27,384 | | | | 131,443 | |
Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. / US(a) | | | 9,389 | | | | 122,433 | |
Los Andes Copper, Ltd.(a) | | | 4,328 | | | | 55,866 | |
MMG, Ltd. | | | 392,000 | | | | 113,558 | |
New World Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 334,031 | | | | 8,011 | |
NGEx Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 21,804 | | | | 119,163 | |
Northern Dynasty Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 166,179 | | | | 39,883 | |
PolyMet Mining Corp.(a) | | | 10,983 | | | | 8,677 | |
Rex Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 171,115 | | | | 26,217 | |
Solaris Resources, Inc.(a) | | | 27,768 | | | | 124,089 | |
Trilogy Metals, Inc.(a) | | | 42,767 | | | | 25,382 | |
Western Copper & Gold Corp.(a) | | | 41,794 | | | | 63,945 | |
Xanadu Mines, Ltd.(a) | | | 227,100 | | | | 12,254 | |
Total Diversified Metals & Mining | | | | | | | 1,378,257 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gold Mining (4.18%) | | | | | | | | |
China Gold International Resources Corp., Ltd. | | | 29,600 | | | | 112,568 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (Cost $2,747,738) | | | | | | | 2,599,815 | |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
EXCHANGE TRADED FUND (3.51%) | | | | | | | | |
iShares MSCI India ETF | | | 2,163 | | | $ | 94,523 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL EXCHANGE TRADED FUND (Cost $87,941) | | | | | | | 94,523 | |
| | Shares | | | Value | |
SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS (13.27%) | | | | | | | | |
Investments Purchased with Collateral from Securities Loaned (13.27%) | | | | | | | | |
State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio, 5.11% | | | | | | | | |
(Cost $357,435) | | | 357,435 | | | | 357,435 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS (Cost $357,435) | | | | | | | 357,435 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (113.33%) (Cost $3,193,114) | | | | | | $ | 3,051,773 | |
LIABILITIES IN EXCESS OF OTHER ASSETS (-13.33%) | | | | | | | (358,920 | ) |
NET ASSETS (100.00%) | | | | | | $ | 2,692,853 | |
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | As of June 30, 2023, the security, or a portion of the security position was on loan. As of June 30, 2023, the total market value of securities on loan was $302,855. The loaned securities were secured with cash collateral of $357,435 and non-cash collateral with the value of $5,922. The non-cash collateral received consists of common stocks and is held for the benefit of the Fund at the Fund’s custodian. The Fund cannot repledge or resell this collateral. Collateral is calculated based on prior day’s prices. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
Schedule of Investments | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Security Description | | Shares | | | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS (99.65%) | | | | | | | | |
Diversified Metals & Mining (96.60%) | | | | | | | | |
Ardea Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 80,203 | | | $ | 18,967 | |
Aston Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 467,307 | | | | 24,281 | |
Azure Minerals, Ltd.(a) | | | 107,327 | | | | 107,602 | |
Canada Nickel Co., Inc.(a) | | | 62,750 | | | | 59,209 | |
Centaurus Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 152,375 | | | | 90,339 | |
Eramet SA | | | 390 | | | | 35,599 | |
FPX Nickel Corp.(a) | | | 90,700 | | | | 31,837 | |
Galileo Mining, Ltd.(a) | | | 65,682 | | | | 24,502 | |
Global Ferronickel Holdings, Inc. | | | 1,608,000 | | | | 70,496 | |
Horizonte Minerals PLC(a) | | | 45,059 | | | | 82,404 | |
IGO, Ltd. | | | 18,448 | | | | 186,796 | |
Legend Mining, Ltd.(a) | | | 741,638 | | | | 20,256 | |
Lunnon Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 32,000 | | | | 20,251 | |
Magna Mining, Inc.(a) | | | 54,700 | | | | 24,774 | |
Nickel 28 Capital Corp.(a) | | | 33,175 | | | | 29,300 | |
Nickel Asia Corp. | | | 706,200 | | | | 76,506 | |
Nickel Industries, Ltd. | | | 391,199 | | | | 230,630 | |
Panoramic Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 387,885 | | | | 23,772 | |
Poseidon Nickel, Ltd.(a) | | | 1,543,813 | | | | 38,051 | |
Premium Nickel Resources, Ltd.(a) | | | 45,225 | | | | 47,111 | |
Sherritt International Corp.(a) | | | 202,450 | | | | 73,354 | |
Sunrise Energy Metals, Ltd.(a) | | | 34,411 | | | | 24,298 | |
Talon Metals Corp.(a) | | | 290,600 | | | | 77,325 | |
Vale Indonesia Tbk PT | | | 404,100 | | | | 169,807 | |
Widgie Nickel, Ltd.(a)(b) | | | 151,113 | | | | 22,146 | |
Xinjiang Xinxin Mining Industry Co., Ltd. | | | 389,000 | | | | 50,139 | |
Total Diversified Metals & Mining | | | | | | | 1,659,752 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gold Mining (3.05%) | | | | | | | | |
Alliance Nickel, Ltd.(a) | | | 282,283 | | | | 17,676 | |
Aneka Tambang Tbk | | | 267,200 | | | | 34,753 | |
Total Gold Mining | | | | | | | 52,429 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (Cost $1,660,023) | | | | | | | 1,712,181 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (99.65%) (Cost $1,660,023) | | | | | | $ | 1,712,181 | |
OTHER ASSETS IN EXCESS OF LIABILITIES (0.35%) | | | | | | | 6,060 | |
NET ASSETS (100.00%) | | | | | | $ | 1,718,241 | |
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | As of June 30, 2023, the security, or a portion of the security position was on loan. As of June 30, 2023, the total market value of securities on loan was $12,800. The loaned securities were secured with cash collateral of $– and non-cash collateral with the value of $13,676. The non-cash collateral received consists of common stocks and is held for the benefit of the Fund at the Fund’s custodian. The Fund cannot repledge or resell this collateral. Collateral is calculated based on prior day’s prices. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott ETFs
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
| | Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | | Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | |
ASSETS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unaffiliated investments, at value | | $ | 261,037,781 | | | $ | 101,034,528 | | | $ | 7,962,375 | |
Foreign currency, at value | | | — | | | | 152 | | | | 17,057 | |
Dividends and reclaim receivable | | | 75,648 | | | | 16,785 | | | | 1,009 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 4,847 | | | | 4,847 | | | | — | |
Total assets | | | 261,118,276 | | | | 101,056,312 | | | | 7,980,441 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payable to Adviser | | | 209,632 | | | | 87,948 | | | | 7,082 | |
Payable to custodian for overdraft | | | 12,624 | | | | — | | | | 3,226 | |
Payable for collateral upon return of securities loaned | | | 13,468,354 | | | | 6,353,686 | | | | 360,042 | |
Administration fees payable | | | 78,019 | | | | 60,601 | | | | — | |
Professional fees payable | | | 28,677 | | | | 18,234 | | | | — | |
Transfer agent fees payable | | | 21,940 | | | | 21,940 | | | | — | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses payable | | | 11,821 | | | | 5,166 | | | | — | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 49,583 | | | | 65,058 | | | | — | |
Total liabilities | | | 13,880,650 | | | | 6,612,633 | | | | 370,350 | |
NET ASSETS | | $ | 247,237,626 | | | $ | 94,443,679 | | | $ | 7,610,091 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $ | 317,355,155 | | | $ | 168,993,678 | | | $ | 7,843,265 | |
Total distributable earnings | | | (70,117,529 | ) | | | (74,549,999 | ) | | | (233,174 | ) |
NET ASSETS | | $ | 247,237,626 | | | $ | 94,443,679 | | | $ | 7,610,091 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
UNAFFILIATED INVESTMENTS, AT COST | | $ | 243,512,196 | | | $ | 105,383,212 | | | $ | 8,284,910 | |
FOREIGN CURRENCY, AT COST | | $ | — | | | $ | 152 | | | $ | 17,069 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
PRICING OF SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 247,237,626 | | | $ | 94,443,679 | | | $ | 7,610,091 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized, par value $0.01 per share) | | | 9,550,000 | | | | 3,390,000 | | | | 430,000 | |
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share | | $ | 25.89 | | | $ | 27.86 | | | $ | 17.70 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott ETFs
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
| | Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | | | Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF | |
ASSETS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unaffiliated investments, at value | | $ | 4,112,132 | | | $ | 853,289,158 | | | $ | 37,094,797 | |
Affiliated investments, at value | | | — | | | | 114,298,753 | | | | — | |
Foreign currency, at value | | | 1,514 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | — | | | | 1,483,788 | | | | 6,512 | |
Dividends and reclaim receivable | | | 2,280 | | | | 50,411 | | | | 1,953 | |
Total assets | | | 4,115,926 | | | | 969,122,110 | | | | 37,103,262 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payable to Adviser | | | 4,231 | | | | 1,223,987 | | | | 34,858 | |
Payable to custodian for overdraft | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,349 | |
Payable for collateral upon return of securities loaned | | | 192,008 | | | | 54,573,368 | | | | 1,543,446 | |
Total liabilities | | | 196,239 | | | | 55,797,355 | | | | 1,581,653 | |
NET ASSETS | | $ | 3,919,687 | | | $ | 913,324,755 | | | $ | 35,521,609 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $ | 3,598,502 | | | $ | 1,095,907,873 | | | $ | 35,042,971 | |
Total distributable earnings | | | 321,185 | | | | (182,583,118 | ) | | | 478,638 | |
NET ASSETS | | $ | 3,919,687 | | | $ | 913,324,755 | | | $ | 35,521,609 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
UNAFFILIATED INVESTMENTS, AT COST | | $ | 4,209,109 | | | $ | 971,868,302 | | | $ | 36,428,658 | |
AFFILIATED INVESTMENTS, AT COST | | $ | — | | | $ | 107,498,517 | | | $ | — | |
FOREIGN CURRENCY, AT COST | | $ | 1,513 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
PRICING OF SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 3,919,687 | | | $ | 913,324,755 | | | $ | 35,521,609 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized, par value $0.01 per share) | | | 210,000 | | | | 27,175,000 | | | | 2,080,000 | |
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share | | $ | 18.67 | | | $ | 33.61 | | | $ | 17.08 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott ETFs
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
| | Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | | | Sprott Nickel Miners ETF | |
ASSETS: | | | | | | | | |
Unaffiliated investments, at value | | $ | 3,051,773 | | | $ | 1,712,181 | |
Foreign currency, at value | | | 601 | | | | 1,803 | |
Dividends and reclaim receivable | | | 1,088 | | | | 8,060 | |
Total assets | | | 3,053,462 | | | | 1,722,044 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Payable to Adviser | | | 3,174 | | | | 1,991 | |
Payable to custodian for overdraft | | | — | | | | 1,812 | |
Payable for collateral upon return of securities loaned | | | 357,435 | | | | — | |
Total liabilities | | | 360,609 | | | | 3,803 | |
NET ASSETS | | $ | 2,692,853 | | | $ | 1,718,241 | |
| | | | | | | | |
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF: | | | | | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $ | 2,821,079 | | | $ | 1,647,232 | |
Total distributable earnings | | | (128,226 | ) | | | 71,009 | |
NET ASSETS | | $ | 2,692,853 | | | $ | 1,718,241 | |
| | | | | | | | |
UNAFFILIATED INVESTMENTS, AT COST | | $ | 3,193,114 | | | $ | 1,660,023 | |
FOREIGN CURRENCY, AT COST | | $ | 724 | | | $ | 1,976 | |
| | | | | | | | |
PRICING OF SHARES | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 2,692,853 | | | $ | 1,718,241 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized, par value $0.01 per share) | | | 140,000 | | | | 80,000 | |
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share | | $ | 19.23 | | | $ | 21.48 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott ETFs
Statements of Operations | For the Period Ended June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
| | Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | | Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF(a) | |
INVESTMENT INCOME: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | $ | 2,500,630 | | | $ | 175,896 | | | $ | 52,920 | |
Securities lending income - net of fees | | | 30,516 | | | | 18,234 | | | | 1,422 | |
Foreign withholding tax | | | (295,919 | ) | | | — | | | | (7,790 | ) |
Total investment income | | | 2,235,227 | | | | 194,130 | | | | 46,552 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Adviser fees (See Note 6) | | | 448,902 | | | | 184,974 | | | | 15,047 | |
Administration fees | | | 78,166 | | | | 49,178 | | | | — | |
Trustee fees | | | 11,821 | | | | 5,166 | | | | — | |
Compliance fees | | | 5,321 | | | | 2,300 | | | | — | |
Legal fees | | | 19,627 | | | | 8,651 | | | | — | |
Audit fees | | | 9,941 | | | | 9,941 | | | | — | |
Transfer agent fees | | | 4,690 | | | | 4,690 | | | | — | |
Other fees and expenses | | | 55,760 | | | | 46,349 | | | | — | |
Total expenses before recoupment/(waiver)/(reimbursement) | | | 634,228 | | | | 311,249 | | | | 15,047 | |
Less fee recoupment/(waiver)/(reimbursement) by investment adviser (See Note 6) | | | 7,636 | | | | (46,854 | ) | | | — | |
Net expense | | | 641,864 | | | | 264,395 | | | | 15,047 | |
NET INVESTMENT INCOME/(LOSS) | | | 1,593,363 | | | | (70,265 | ) | | | 31,505 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN/(LOSS) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain/(loss) on unaffiliated investments | | | 1,302,624 | (b) | | | (6,308,519 | )(b) | | 57,258 | (b) |
Net realized gain/(loss) on foreign currency transactions | | | (9,684 | ) | | | (26,261 | ) | | | 610 | |
Net realized gain/(loss) | | | 1,292,940 | | | | (6,334,780 | ) | | | 57,868 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on unaffiliated investments | | | 8,291,051 | | | | 3,605,016 | | | | (322,535 | ) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies | | | 1,128 | | | | (493 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 8,292,179 | | | | 3,604,523 | | | | (322,547 | ) |
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN/(LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS | | | 9,585,119 | | | | (2,730,257 | ) | | | (264,679 | ) |
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | | $ | 11,178,482 | | | $ | (2,800,522 | ) | | $ | (233,174 | ) |
| (a) | The Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (b) | Includes realized gain or loss as a result of in-kind transactions (See Note 8). |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott ETFs
Statements of Operations | For the Period Ended June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
| | Sprott Lithium Miners ETF(a) | | | Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF(b) | |
INVESTMENT INCOME: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | $ | 27,445 | | | $ | 16,946 | | | $ | 254 | |
Securities lending income - net of fees | | | 4,169 | | | | 410,834 | | | | 2,890 | |
Foreign withholding tax | | | (6,388 | ) | | | (94,187 | ) | | | — | |
Total investment income | | | 25,226 | | | | 333,593 | | | | 3,144 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Adviser fees (See Note 6) | | | 9,861 | | | | 3,589,284 | | | | 60,494 | |
NET INVESTMENT INCOME/(LOSS) | | | 15,365 | | | | (3,255,691 | ) | | | (57,350 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN/(LOSS) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain/(loss) on unaffiliated investments | | | 402,155 | (c) | | | (7,269,848 | )(c) | | (127,529 | ) |
Net realized gain/(loss) on affiliated investments | | | — | | | | (3,403,032 | )(c) | | — | |
Net realized gain/(loss) on foreign currency transactions | | | 641 | | | | (31,102 | ) | | | (2,622 | ) |
Net realized gain/(loss) | | | 402,796 | | | | (10,703,982 | ) | | | (130,151 | ) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on unaffiliated investments | | | (96,976 | ) | | | 46,515,438 | | | | 666,139 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on affiliated investments | | | — | | | | 11,314,785 | | | | — | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | (96,976 | ) | | | 57,830,223 | | | | 666,139 | |
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN/(LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS | | | 305,820 | | | | 47,126,241 | | | | 535,988 | |
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | | $ | 321,185 | | | $ | 43,870,550 | | | $ | 478,638 | |
| (a) | The Sprott Lithium Miners ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (b) | The Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (c) | Includes realized gain or loss as a result of in-kind transactions (See Note 8). |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott ETFs
Statements of Operations | For the Period Ended June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
| | Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF(a) | | | Sprott Nickel Miners ETF(b) | |
INVESTMENT INCOME: | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | $ | 18,899 | | | $ | 16,374 | |
Securities lending income - net of fees | | | 519 | | | | 401 | |
Foreign withholding tax | | | (3,188 | ) | | | (2,591 | ) |
Total investment income | | | 16,230 | | | | 14,184 | |
| | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | |
Investment Adviser fees (See Note 6) | | | 6,769 | | | | 3,239 | |
Total expenses | | | 6,769 | | | | 3,239 | |
NET INVESTMENT INCOME | | | 9,461 | | | | 10,945 | |
| | | | | | | | |
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN/(LOSS) | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain/(loss) on unaffiliated investments | | | 2,636 | | | | 8,611 | |
Net realized gain/(loss) on foreign currency transactions | | | 1,141 | | | | (532 | ) |
Net realized gain/(loss) | | | 3,777 | | | | 8,079 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on unaffiliated investments | | | (141,341 | ) | | | 52,158 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies | | | (123 | ) | | | (173 | ) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | (141,464 | ) | | | 51,985 | |
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN/(LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS | | | (137,687 | ) | | | 60,064 | |
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | | $ | (128,226 | ) | | $ | 71,009 | |
| (a) | The Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (b) | The Sprott Nickel Miners ETF commenced operations on March 21, 2023. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott ETFs
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | | Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | |
| | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 | | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 | |
OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss) | | $ | 1,593,363 | | | $ | 3,322,817 | | | $ | (70,265 | ) | | $ | 622,963 | |
Net realized gain/(loss) | | | 1,292,940 | | | | (8,525,252 | ) | | | (6,334,780 | ) | | | (34,052,406 | ) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 8,292,179 | | | | (16,624,411 | ) | | | 3,604,523 | | | | 268,060 | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | | | 11,178,482 | | | | (21,826,846 | ) | | | (2,800,522 | ) | | | (33,161,383 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From distributable earnings | | | — | | | | (3,155,580 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,518,228 | ) |
Total distributions | | | — | | | | (3,155,580 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,518,228 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | 22,083,737 | | | | 35,456,531 | | | | 1,676,673 | | | | 13,922,116 | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (19,456,351 | ) | | | (8,956,306 | ) | | | (6,802,463 | ) | | | — | |
Net increase/(decrease) from capital share transactions | | | 2,627,386 | | | | 26,500,225 | | | | (5,125,790 | ) | | | 13,922,116 | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets | | | 13,805,868 | | | | 1,517,799 | | | | (7,926,312 | ) | | | (21,757,495 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET ASSETS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 233,431,758 | | | | 231,913,959 | | | | 102,369,991 | | | | 124,127,486 | |
End of period | | $ | 247,237,626 | | | $ | 233,431,758 | | | $ | 94,443,679 | | | $ | 102,369,991 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OTHER INFORMATION: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning shares | | | 9,450,000 | | | | 8,500,000 | | | | 3,550,000 | | | | 3,050,000 | |
Shares sold | | | 810,000 | | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 50,000 | | | | 500,000 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (710,000 | ) | | | (350,000 | ) | | | (210,000 | ) | | | — | |
Shares outstanding, end of period | | | 9,550,000 | | | | 9,450,000 | | | | 3,390,000 | | | | 3,550,000 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott ETFs
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF(a) | | | Sprott Lithium Miners ETF(b) | |
| | For the Period February 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | | | For the Period February 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | |
OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss) | | $ | 31,505 | | | $ | 15,365 | |
Net realized gain/(loss) | | | 57,868 | | | | 402,796 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | (322,547 | ) | | | (96,976 | ) |
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | | | (233,174 | ) | | | 321,185 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | 9,180,649 | | | | 6,224,747 | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (1,337,384 | ) | | | (2,626,245 | ) |
Net increase/(decrease) from capital share transactions | | | 7,843,265 | | | | 3,598,502 | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets | | | 7,610,091 | | | | 3,919,687 | |
| | | | | | | | |
NET ASSETS: | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | — | | | | — | |
End of period | | $ | 7,610,091 | | | $ | 3,919,687 | |
| | | | | | | | |
OTHER INFORMATION: | | | | | | | | |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | |
Beginning shares | | | — | | | | — | |
Shares sold | | | 510,002 | | | | 350,002 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (80,002 | ) | | | (140,002 | ) |
Shares outstanding, end of period | | | 430,000 | | | | 210,000 | |
| (a) | The Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (b) | The Sprott Lithium Miners ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott ETFs
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | |
| | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | | | For the Period September 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022(a) | | | For the Year Ended August 31, 2022(b) | |
OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss) | | $ | (3,255,691 | ) | | $ | (1,727,079 | ) | | $ | 3,334,564 | |
Net realized gain/(loss) | | | (10,703,982 | ) | | | (20,721,518 | ) | | | 83,365,189 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 57,830,223 | | | | (167,885,974 | ) | | | (21,855,184 | ) |
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | | | 43,870,550 | | | | (190,334,571 | ) | | | 64,844,569 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From distributable earnings | | | — | | | | — | | | | (46,290,058 | ) |
Total distributions | | | — | | | | — | | | | (46,290,058 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | 83,294,694 | | | | 21,063,643 | | | | 1,011,484,344 | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (40,308,771 | ) | | | (41,844,588 | ) | | | (348,231,453 | )(c) |
Net increase/(decrease) from capital share transactions | | | 42,985,923 | | | | (20,780,945 | ) | | | 663,252,891 | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets | | | 86,856,473 | | | | (211,115,516 | ) | | | 681,807,402 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET ASSETS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 826,468,282 | | | | 1,037,583,798 | | | | 355,776,396 | |
End of period | | $ | 913,324,755 | | | $ | 826,468,282 | | | $ | 1,037,583,798 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning shares | | | 25,975,000 | | | | 13,325,000 | | | | 5,725,000 | |
Shares sold | | | 2,450,000 | | | | 300,000 | | | | 12,025,000 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (1,250,000 | ) | | | (725,000 | ) | | | (4,425,000 | ) |
Stock Split | | | — | | | | 13,075,000 | (d) | | | — | |
Shares outstanding, end of period | | | 27,175,000 | | | | 25,975,000 | | | | 13,325,000 | |
| (a) | Effective September 6, 2022, the Board approved changing the fiscal year-end of the Fund from August 31 to December 31. |
| (b) | The fund was reorganized on April 22, 2022 and became a series within the Sprott Funds Trust thereafter. |
| (c) | Net of redemption fees of $78,990. |
| (d) | On December 21, 2022, the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF underwent a two for one stock split. See Note 1 for additional details. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott ETFs
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF(a) | | | Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF(b) | | | Sprott Nickel Miners ETF(c) | |
| | For the Period February 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | | | For the Period February 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | | | For the Period March 21, 2023 to June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | |
OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss) | | $ | (57,350 | ) | | $ | 9,461 | | | $ | 10,945 | |
Net realized gain/(loss) | | | (130,151 | ) | | | 3,777 | | | | 8,079 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 666,139 | | | | (141,464 | ) | | | 51,985 | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | | | 478,638 | | | | (128,226 | ) | | | 71,009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | 35,043,011 | | | | 2,821,119 | | | | 1,647,252 | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (40 | ) | | | (40 | ) | | | (20 | ) |
Net increase/(decrease) from capital share transactions | | | 35,042,971 | | | | 2,821,079 | | | | 1,647,232 | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets | | | 35,521,609 | | | | 2,692,853 | | | | 1,718,241 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET ASSETS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
End of period | | $ | 35,521,609 | | | $ | 2,692,853 | | | $ | 1,718,241 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
OTHER INFORMATION: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning shares | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Shares sold | | | 2,080,002 | | | | 140,002 | | | | 80,001 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
Shares outstanding, end of period | | | 2,080,000 | | | | 140,000 | | | | 80,000 | |
| (a) | The Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (b) | The Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (c) | The Sprott Nickel Miners ETF commenced operations on March 21, 2023. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Periods Presented | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 | | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 | | | For the Period December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020(a) | | | For the Year Ended November 30, 2020 | | | For the Year Ended November 30, 2019 | | | For the Year Ended Novembe 30, 2018 (b) | |
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | $ | 24.70 | | | $ | 27.28 | | | $ | 30.50 | | | $ | 29.57 | | | $ | 23.37 | | | $ | 15.26 | | | $ | 19.82 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME/(LOSS) FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss) (c) | | | 0.17 | | | | 0.37 | | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.03 | | | | 0.07 | | | | 0.02 | | | | 0.07 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) | | | 1.02 | | | | (2.60 | ) | | | (3.19 | ) | | | 0.99 | | | | 6.19 | | | | 8.18 | | | | (4.51 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | 1.19 | | | | (2.23 | ) | | | (2.86 | ) | | | 1.02 | | | | 6.26 | | | | 8.20 | | | | (4.44 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
DISTRIBUTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | — | | | | (0.35 | ) | | | (0.36 | ) | | | (0.09 | ) | | | (0.06 | ) | | | (0.09 | ) | | | (0.12 | ) |
Total distributions | | | — | | | | (0.35 | ) | | | (0.36 | ) | | | (0.09 | ) | | | (0.06 | ) | | | (0.09 | ) | | | (0.12 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net asset value | | | 1.19 | | | | (2.58 | ) | | | (3.22 | ) | | | 0.93 | | | | 6.20 | | | | 8.11 | | | | (4.56 | ) |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 25.89 | | | $ | 24.70 | | | $ | 27.28 | | | $ | 30.50 | | | $ | 29.57 | | | $ | 23.37 | | | $ | 15.26 | |
TOTAL RETURN(d) | | | 4.82 | % | | | (8.18 | )% | | | (9.33 | )% | | | 3.46 | % | | | 26.85 | % | | | 53.91 | % | | | (22.56 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000s) | | $ | 247,238 | | | $ | 233,432 | | | $ | 231,914 | | | $ | 259,234 | | | $ | 251,376 | | | $ | 177,647 | | | $ | 123,576 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses including waiver/reimbursement/recoupment to average net assets | | | 0.50 | %(e) | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.50 | %(e) | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.54 | %(f) | | N/A | |
Ratio of expenses excluding waiver/reimbursement/recoupment to average net assets | | | 0.49 | %(e) | | 0.51 | % | | | 0.49 | % | | | 0.58 | %(e) | | 0.52 | % | | | 0.57 | % | | | 0.57 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | 1.24 | %(e) | | 1.43 | % | | | 1.18 | % | | | 1.28 | %(e) | | 0.24 | % | | | 0.09 | % | | | 0.39 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate(g) | | | 30 | % | | | 73 | % | | | 66 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 95 | % | | | 112 | % | | | 82 | % |
| (a) | With the approval of the Board effective December 31, 2020, the Fund’s fiscal year end was changed from November 30 to December 31. |
| (b) | These financials have been audited by the Predecessor Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm. |
| (c) | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
| (d) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period and redemption at the net asset value on the last day of the period and assuming all distributions are reinvested at reinvestment prices. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
| (f) | Prior to July 19, 2019, the prior adviser paid certain Fund expenses via a unitary fee arrangement; no fees or expenses were waived. |
| (g) | Portfolio turnover rate does not include securities received or delivered from processing creations or redemptions in-kind. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Periods Presented | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 | | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 | | | For the Period December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020(a) | | | For the Year Ended November 30, 2020 | | | For the Year Ended November 30, 2019 | | | For the Year Ended November 30, 2018 (b) | |
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | $ | 28.84 | | | $ | 40.70 | | | $ | 49.30 | | | $ | 45.27 | | | $ | 30.28 | | | $ | 21.63 | | | $ | 31.48 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME/(LOSS) FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss)(c) | | | (0.02 | ) | | | 0.19 | | | | 0.42 | | | | (0.00 | )(d) | | | (0.04 | ) | | | 0.06 | | | | (0.06 | ) |
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) | | | (0.96 | ) | | | (11.34 | ) | | | (8.12 | ) | | | 5.00 | | | | 15.25 | | | | 8.59 | | | | (9.74 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | (0.98 | ) | | | (11.15 | ) | | | (7.70 | ) | | | 5.00 | | | | 15.21 | | | | 8.65 | | | | (9.80 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
DISTRIBUTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | — | | | | (0.71 | ) | | | (0.90 | ) | | | (0.97 | ) | | | (0.22 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.05 | ) |
Total distributions | | | — | | | | (0.71 | ) | | | (0.90 | ) | | | (0.97 | ) | | | (0.22 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.05 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net asset value | | | (0.98 | ) | | | (11.86 | ) | | | (8.60 | ) | | | 4.03 | | | | 14.99 | | | | 8.65 | | | | (9.85 | ) |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 27.86 | | | $ | 28.84 | | | $ | 40.70 | | | $ | 49.30 | | | $ | 45.27 | | | $ | 30.28 | | | $ | 21.63 | |
TOTAL RETURN(e) | | | (3.40 | )% | | | (27.40 | )% | | | (15.56 | )% | | | 11.11 | % | | | 50.56 | % | | | 39.99 | % | | | (31.19 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000s) | | $ | 94,444 | | | $ | 102,370 | | | $ | 124,127 | | | $ | 123,258 | | | $ | 106,383 | | | $ | 52,994 | | | $ | 36,776 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses including waiver/reimbursement/recoupment to average net assets | | | 0.50 | %(f) | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.50 | %(f) | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.54 | %(g) | | N/A | |
Ratio of expenses excluding waiver/reimbursement/recoupment to average net assets | | | 0.59 | %(f) | | 0.67 | % | | | 0.61 | % | | | 0.75 | %(f) | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.71 | % | | | 0.57 | % |
Ratio of net investment income/(loss) to average net assets | | | (0.13 | )%(f) | | 0.59 | % | | | 0.96 | % | | | (0.07 | )%(f) | | (0.10 | )% | | | 0.22 | % | | | (0.22 | )% |
Portfolio turnover rate(h) | | | 42 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 66 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 157 | % | | | 127 | % | | | 37 | % |
| (a) | With the approval of the Board effective December 31, 2020, the Fund’s fiscal year end was changed from November 30 to December 31. |
| (b) | These financials have been audited by the Predecessor Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm. |
| (c) | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
| (d) | Less than $0.005 per share. |
| (e) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period and redemption at the net asset value on the last day of the period and assuming all distributions are reinvested at reinvestment prices. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
| (g) | Prior to July 19, 2019, the prior adviser paid certain Fund expenses via a unitary fee arrangement; no fees or expenses were waived. |
| (h) | Portfolio turnover rate does not include securities received or delivered from processing creations or redemptions in-kind. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period Presented | | For the Period February 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 (Unaudited)(a) | |
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | $ | 20.49 | |
| | | | |
INCOME/(LOSS) FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss) (b) | | | 0.10 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) | | | (2.89 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | (2.79 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net asset value | | | (2.79 | ) |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 17.70 | |
TOTAL RETURN(c) | | | (13.62 | )% |
| | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000s) | | $ | 7,610 | |
| | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 0.65 | %(d) |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | 1.36 | %(d) |
Portfolio turnover rate(e) | | | 17 | % |
| (a) | The Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (b) | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
| (c) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period and redemption at the net asset value on the last day of the period and assuming all distributions are reinvested at reinvestment prices. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
| (e) | Portfolio turnover rate does not include securities received or delivered from processing creations or redemptions in-kind. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period Presented | | For the Period February 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 (Unaudited)(a) | |
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | $ | 20.21 | |
| | | | |
INCOME/(LOSS) FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss) (b) | | | 0.07 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) | | | (1.61 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | (1.54 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net asset value | | | (1.54 | ) |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 18.67 | |
TOTAL RETURN(c) | | | (7.62 | )% |
| | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000s) | | $ | 3,920 | |
| | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 0.65 | %(d) |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | 1.01 | %(d) |
Portfolio turnover rate(e) | | | 28 | % |
| (a) | The Sprott Lithium Miners ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (b) | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
| (c) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period and redemption at the net asset value on the last day of the period and assuming all distributions are reinvested at reinvestment prices. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
| (e) | Portfolio turnover rate does not include securities received or delivered from processing creations or redemptions in-kind. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Periods Presented | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) | | | For the Period September 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 (a) | | | For the Year Ended August 31, 2022 (b) | | | For the Year Ended August 31, 2021 (b)(c) | | | For the Period December 3, 2019 (Commencement of Operations) to August 31, 2020 (b)(c) | |
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | $ | 31.82 | | | $ | 38.94 | | | $ | 31.07 | | | $ | 16.69 | | | $ | 12.50 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME/(LOSS) FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss)(d) | | | (0.12 | ) | | | (0.07 | ) | | | 0.15 | | | | 0.23 | | | | 0.08 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) | | | 1.91 | | | | (7.05 | ) | | | 10.12 | | | | 14.71 | | | | 4.11 | |
Total from investment operations | | | 1.79 | | | | (7.12 | ) | | | 10.27 | | | | 14.94 | | | | 4.19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
DISTRIBUTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2.42 | ) | | | (0.56 | ) | | | — | |
Total distributions | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2.42 | ) | | | (0.56 | ) | | | — | |
Redemptions fees | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.02 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net asset value | | | 1.79 | | | | (7.12 | ) | | | 7.87 | | | | 14.38 | | | | 4.19 | |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 33.61 | | | $ | 31.82 | | | $ | 38.94 | | | $ | 31.07 | | | $ | 16.69 | |
TOTAL RETURN(e) | | | 5.63 | % | | | (18.28 | )% | | | 33.42 | % | | | 91.13 | % | | | 33.48 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000s) | | $ | 913,325 | | | $ | 826,468 | | | $ | 1,037,584 | | | $ | 355,776 | | | $ | 14,184 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 0.83 | %(f) | | 0.83 | %(f) | | 0.83 | % | | | 0.85 | % | | | 0.85 | %(f) |
Ratio of net investment income/(loss) to average net assets | | | (0.75 | )%(f) | | (0.58 | )%(f) | | 0.40 | % | | | 0.81 | % | | | 0.74 | %(f) |
Portfolio turnover rate(g) | | | 5 | % | | | 17 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 28 | % |
| (a) | With the approval of the Board effective September 6, 2022, the Fund’s fiscal year end was changed from August 31 to December 31. |
| (b) | On December 21, 2022, the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF underwent a two for one stock split. The capital share activity presented here has been retroactively adjusted to reflect this stock split. |
| (c) | These financials have been audited by the Predecessor Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm. |
| (d) | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
| (e) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period and redemption at the net asset value on the last day of the period and assuming all distributions are reinvested at reinvestment prices. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
| (g) | Portfolio turnover rate does not include securities received or delivered from processing creations or redemptions in-kind. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period Presented | | For the Period February 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 (Unaudited)(a) | |
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | $ | 20.26 | |
| | | | |
INCOME/(LOSS) FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss) (b) | | | (0.05 | ) |
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) | | | (3.13 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | (3.18 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net asset value | | | (3.18 | ) |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 17.08 | |
TOTAL RETURN(c) | | | (15.70 | )% |
| | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000s) | | $ | 35,522 | |
| | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 0.80 | %(d) |
Ratio of net investment income/(loss) to average net assets | | | (0.76 | )%(d) |
Portfolio turnover rate(e) | | | 11 | % |
| (a) | The Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (b) | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
| (c) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period and redemption at the net asset value on the last day of the period and assuming all distributions are reinvested at reinvestment prices. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
| (e) | Portfolio turnover rate does not include securities received or delivered from processing creations or redemptions in-kind. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period Presented | | For the Period February 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 (Unaudited)(a) | |
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | $ | 20.33 | |
| | | | |
INCOME/(LOSS) FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss) (b) | | | 0.08 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) | | | (1.18 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | (1.10 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net asset value | | | (1.10 | ) |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 19.23 | |
TOTAL RETURN(c) | | | (5.41 | )% |
| | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000s) | | $ | 2,693 | |
| | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 0.75 | %(d) |
Ratio of net investment income/(loss) to average net assets | | | 1.05 | %(d) |
Portfolio turnover rate(e) | | | 22 | % |
| (a) | The Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF commenced operations on February 1, 2023. |
| (b) | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
| (c) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period and redemption at the net asset value on the last day of the period and assuming all distributions are reinvested at reinvestment prices. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
| (e) | Portfolio turnover rate does not include securities received or delivered from processing creations or redemptions in-kind. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
Financial Highlights
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period Presented | | For the Period March 21, 2023 to June 30, 2023 (Unaudited)(a) | |
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | $ | 20.69 | |
| | | | |
INCOME/(LOSS) FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | |
Net investment income/(loss) (b) | | | 0.15 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) | | | 0.64 | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.79 | |
| | | | |
Net increase/(decrease) in net asset value | | | 0.79 | |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 21.48 | |
TOTAL RETURN(c) | | | 3.82 | % |
| | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000s) | | $ | 1,718 | |
| | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 0.75 | %(d) |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | 2.53 | %(d) |
Portfolio turnover rate(e) | | | 17 | % |
| (a) | The Sprott Nickel Miners ETF commenced operations on March 21, 2023. |
| (b) | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
| (c) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period and redemption at the net asset value on the last day of the period and assuming all distributions are reinvested at reinvestment prices. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
| (e) | Portfolio turnover rate does not include securities received or delivered from processing creations or redemptions in-kind. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
1. ORGANIZATION
The Sprott Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on January 3, 2018. As of June 30, 2023, the Trust consisted of nine separate portfolios that each represents a separate series of the Trust the financial statements of eight of which are presented in this report. The Sprott Gold Miners ETF and the Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF were reorganized effective as of the close of business on July 19, 2019, from each Fund’s respective predecessor fund. Each predecessor fund was a separate series of ALPS ETF Trust. The Sprott Uranium Miners ETF, previously part of another investment company, North Shore Global Uranium Mining ETF, reorganized effective after the close of business on April 22, 2022. The Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF, Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF, Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF, and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF were added to the Trust during the 6 months ended June 30, 2023. This report pertains to the above listed funds (each a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”). The Funds are non-diversified, open-end management investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
The Board authorized a two-for-one forward share split of Sprott Uranium Miners ETF that was effective prior to the market open on December 21, 2022. The impact of the forward share split was to increase the number of shares outstanding by a factor of two, while decreasing the NAV per share outstanding by a factor of one-half, resulting in no effect to the net assets of the Fund. The financial statements of the Fund have been adjusted to reflect the forward share split.
During the reporting period, Sprott Asset Management LP was the investment adviser (the “Adviser”) to each Fund. See Note 11 – Subsequent Events.
Pursuant to the Trust’s organizational documents, its Officers and Trustees are indemnified against certain liability arising out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust enters into contracts with service providers that contain general indemnification clauses. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds in the preparation of the financial statements. The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A. Portfolio Valuation and Methodologies
Each Fund’s NAV is determined daily, as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE, normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time, on each day the NYSE is open for trading. The NAV is computed by dividing the value of all assets of a Fund (including accrued interest and dividends), less all liabilities (including accrued expenses and dividends declared but unpaid), by the total number of shares outstanding.
Portfolio securities are valued at the most recent sale price or official closing price reported on the exchange (U.S. or foreign) or over-the-counter market on which they trade. Portfolio securities traded on more than one securities exchange are valued at the last sale price on the business day as of which such value is being determined at the close of the exchange representing the principal market for such securities. Securities for which no sales are reported are valued at the most recent bid quotation. Investments in open-end mutual funds such as money market funds are valued at the closing NAV.
The Funds’ investments generally are valued at market value. In the absence of market value, if events (e.g., market volatility, company announcement or a natural disaster) occur that are expected to materially affect the value of a Fund’s investment, in the event that it is determined that valuation results in a price for an investment that is deemed not to be representative of the market value of such investment, or if a price is not available, the investment will be valued in accordance with the Adviser’s policies and procedures as reflecting fair value (“Fair Value Policies and Procedures”). U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the price a fund would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board”) has approved the designation of the Adviser of the Funds as the valuation designee for the Funds. The Adviser has formed a committee (the “Valuation Committee”) that has developed pricing policies and procedures and to oversee the pricing function for all financial instruments.
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
The fair valuation approaches that may be used by the Valuation Committee include market approach, income approach and cost approach. Valuation techniques such as discounted cash flow, use of market comparables and matrix pricing are types of valuation approaches and are typically used in determining fair value. When determining the price for fair valued investments, the Valuation Committee seeks to determine the price that a Fund might reasonably expect to receive or pay from the current sale or purchase of that asset or liability in an arm’s-length transaction. Fair value determinations shall be based upon all available factors that the Valuation Committee deems relevant and consistent with the principles of fair value measurement.
B. Fair Value Hiearchy
Each Fund discloses the classification of its fair value measurements following a three-tier hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. Inputs may be observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability that are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability that are developed based on the best information available.
Valuation techniques used to value the Funds’ investments by major category are as follows:
Generally, if the security is traded in an active market and is valued at the last sale price, the security is categorized as a Level 1 security. When market quotations are not readily available, when the Adviser determines that the market quotation or the price provided by the pricing service does not accurately reflect the current fair value, or when restricted securities are being valued, such securities are valued as determined in good faith by the Adviser, subject to valuation procedures approved by the Board and are categorized in Level 2 or Level 3, when appropriate.
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of each Fund’s investments as of the end of the reporting period. When inputs used fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The designated input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with these investments.
These inputs are categorized in the following hierarchy under applicable financial accounting standards:
| Level 1 – | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments, unrestricted assets or liabilities that a Fund has the ability to access at the measurement date; |
| Level 2 – | Quoted prices in markets which are not active, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable (either directly or indirectly) for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and |
| Level 3 – | Significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) where there is little or no market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. |
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds’ investments at June 30, 2023:
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Securities at Value | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Common Stocks* | | $ | 247,204,244 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 247,204,244 | |
Short Term Investments | | | 13,833,537 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13,833,537 | |
Total | | $ | 261,037,781 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 261,037,781 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Securities at Value | | | Level 1 | | | | Level 2 | | | | Level 3 | | | | Total | |
Common Stocks* | | $ | 93,673,407 | | | $ | 884,031 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 94,557,438 | |
Rights* | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Short Term Investments | | | 6,477,090 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,477,090 | |
Total | | $ | 100,150,497 | | | $ | 884,031 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 101,034,528 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Securities at Value | | | Level 1 | | | | Level 2 | | | | Level 3 | | | | Total | |
Common Stocks* | | $ | 7,566,270 | | | $ | 13,120 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 7,579,390 | |
Exchange Traded Fund* | | | 22,943 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 22,943 | |
Short Term Investments | | | 360,042 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 360,042 | |
Total | | $ | 7,949,255 | | | $ | 13,120 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 7,962,375 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Securities at Value | | | Level 1 | | | | Level 2 | | | | Level 3 | | | | Total | |
Common Stocks* | | $ | 3,893,933 | | | $ | 21,145 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,915,078 | |
Short Term Investments | | | 197,054 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 197,054 | |
Total | | $ | 4,090,987 | | | $ | 21,145 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,112,132 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Securities at Value | | | Level 1 | | | | Level 2 | | | | Level 3 | | | | Total | |
Common Stocks* | | $ | 798,200,955 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 798,200,955 | |
Closed End Fund* | | | 114,298,753 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 114,298,753 | |
Short Term Investments | | | 55,088,203 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 55,088,203 | |
Total | | $ | 967,587,911 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 967,587,911 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Securities at Value | | | Level 1 | | | | Level 2 | | | | Level 3 | | | | Total | |
Common Stocks* | | $ | 35,551,351 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 35,551,351 | |
Short Term Investments | | | 1,543,446 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,543,446 | |
Total | | $ | 37,094,797 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 37,094,797 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Securities at Value | | | Level 1 | | | | Level 2 | | | | Level 3 | | | | Total | |
Common Stocks* | | $ | 2,585,315 | | | $ | 14,500 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,599,815 | |
Exchange Traded Fund* | | | 94,523 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 94,523 | |
Short Term Investments | | | 357,435 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 357,435 | |
Total | | $ | 3,037,273 | | | $ | 14,500 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,051,773 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Securities at Value | | | Level 1 | | | | Level 2 | | | | Level 3 | | | | Total | |
Common Stocks* | | $ | 1,712,181 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,712,181 | |
Total | | $ | 1,712,181 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,712,181 | |
* | For a detailed sector breakdown, see the accompanying Schedule of Investments. |
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
C. Securities Transactions and Investment Income
Securities transactions are recorded as of the trade date. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded with a specific identification cost method. Dividend income and capital gains distributions, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income, if any, is recorded on the accrual basis. Income received from foreign sources may result in withholding tax. Withholding taxes are accrued at the same time as the related income if the tax rate is fixed and known, unless a tax withheld is reclaimable from the local tax authorities in which case it is recorded as receivable. If the tax rate is not known or estimable, such expense or reclaim receivable is recorded when the net proceeds are received.
D. Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders
Dividends from net investment income for each Fund, if any, are declared and paid annually or as the Board may determine from time to time. Distributions of net realized capital gains earned by the Funds, if any, are distributed at least annually.
E. Foreign Currency Translation
The books and records of the Funds are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment valuations and other assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are converted each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. The portion of realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed and is included in realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments in the Statement of Operations, when applicable.
3. PRINCIPAL RISKS
A. Commodity Risk
Each Fund invests in companies primarily engaged in the mining or processing of a commodity, the stock price of which may be subject to the risks associated with that commodity. A particular commodity is subject to the special risks including: (1) the price of the commodity may be subject to wide fluctuation; (2) the market for the commodity is relatively limited; (3) the sources of the commodity are concentrated in countries that have the potential for instability; and (4) the market for the commodity is unregulated. The price of the commodity can be significantly affected by central bank operations, events relating to international political developments, the success of exploration projects, adverse environmental developments and tax and government regulations.
B. Currency Risk
Currencies and securities denominated in foreign currencies may be affected by changes in exchange rates between those currencies and the U.S. dollar. Currency exchange rates may be volatile and may fluctuate in response to interest rate changes, the general economic conditions of a country, the actions of the U.S. and foreign governments, central banks, or supranational entities such as the International Monetary Fund, the imposition of currency controls, other political or regulatory conditions in the U.S. or abroad, speculation, or other factors. A decline in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar reduces the value in U.S. dollars of the Fund’s investments in that foreign currency and investments denominated in that foreign currency.
C. Equity Securities Risk
The price of equity securities may rise or fall because of changes in the broad market or changes in a company’s financial condition, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably. A stock or stocks selected for the Fund’s portfolio may fail to perform as expected. A value stock may decrease in price or may not increase in price as anticipated by the portfolio managers if other investors fail to recognize the company’s value or the factors that the portfolio managers believe will cause the stock price to increase do not occur.
D. Foreign Securities Risk
A foreign government may expropriate a Fund’s assets. Political, social or economic instability in a foreign country in which the Fund invests may cause the value of the Fund’s investments to decline. These risks associated with non-U.S. securities are more likely in the securities of companies located in emerging markets.
E. Industry Concentration Risk
If a Fund’s assets are concentrated in an industry or group of industries, a Fund is subject to loss due to adverse occurrences that may affect that industry or group of industries.
F. Liquidity Risk
Foreign stock exchanges generally have less volume than U.S. stock exchanges. Therefore, it may be more difficult to buy or sell shares of foreign securities, which increases the volatility of share prices on such markets. Additionally, trading on foreign stock markets may involve longer settlement periods and higher transaction costs.
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
G. Market and Geopolitical Risk
The increasing interconnectivity between global economies and financial markets increases the likelihood that events or conditions in one region or financial market may adversely impact issuers in a different country, region or financial market. Securities in the Fund may underperform due to inflation (or expectations for inflation), interest rates, global demand for particular products or resources, natural disasters, pandemics, epidemics, terrorism, international conflicts, regulatory events and governmental or quasi-governmental actions. The occurrence of global events similar to those in recent years, such as terrorist attacks around the world, natural disasters, social and political discord or debt crises and downgrades, among others, may result in market volatility and may have long term effects on both the U.S. and global financial markets. It is difficult to predict when similar events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects. Any such event(s) could have a significant adverse impact on the value and risk profile of the Fund. The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic and the aggressive responses taken by many governments, including closing borders, restricting international and domestic travel, and the imposition of prolonged quarantines or similar restrictions, as well as the forced or voluntary closure of, or operational changes to, many retail and other businesses, had negative impacts, and in many cases severe negative impacts, on markets worldwide.
H. Restricted Securities Risk
A Fund may invest in restricted securities. Restricted securities have contractual or legal restrictions on their resale. They may include private placement securities that the Fund buys directly from the issuer. Private placement and other restricted securities may not be listed on an exchange and may have no active trading market. Restricted securities may be illiquid. A Fund may be unable to sell them on short notice or may be able to sell them only at a price below current value. The Fund may get only limited information about the issuer, so it may be less able to predict a loss.
I. Securities Lending Risk
Although a Fund will receive collateral in connection with all loans of its securities holdings, the Fund would be exposed to a risk of loss should a borrower default on its obligation to return the borrowed securities (e.g., the loaned securities may have appreciated beyond the value of the collateral held by the Fund). In addition, the Fund will bear the risk of loss of any cash collateral that it invests.
J. Small- and Mid-Capitalization Company Risk
Smaller and mid-size companies often have a more limited track record, narrower markets, less liquidity, more limited managerial and financial resources and a less diversified product offering than larger, more established companies. As a result, their performance can be more volatile, which may increase the volatility of the Fund’s portfolio.
K. Tax Risk
A Fund is subject to the risk that it could fail to qualify as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”) if it derives more than 10% its gross income from investment in gold bullion or other precious metals. Failure to qualify as a regulated investment company would result in consequences to a Fund and its shareholders. In order to ensure that it qualifies as a regulated investment company, the Fund may be required to make investment decisions that are less than optimal or forego the opportunity to realize gains.
L. Valuation Risk
The risk that a Fund has valued certain securities at a higher price than the price at which they can be sold. This risk may be especially pronounced for investments, such as derivatives, which may be illiquid or which may become illiquid.
M. Investments in Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)
ETFs typically trade on securities exchanges and their shares may, at times, trade at a premium or discount to their net asset values. In addition, an ETF may not replicate exactly the performance of the benchmark index it seeks to track for a number of reasons, including transaction costs incurred by the ETF, the temporary unavailability of certain index securities in the secondary market or discrepancies between the ETF and the index with respect to the weighting of securities or the number of securities held. Investing in ETFs, which are investment companies, may involve duplication of advisory fees and certain other expenses. As a result, Fund shareholders indirectly bear their proportionate share of these acquired expenses. Therefore, the cost of investing in the Funds will be higher than the cost of investing directly in ETFs and may be higher than other mutual funds that invest directly in securities.
Each ETF in which the Funds invest is subject to specific risks, depending on the nature of the ETF. Each ETF is subject to the risks associated with direct ownership of the securities comprising the index on which the ETF is based. These risks could include liquidity risk, sector risk as well as risks associated with fixed-income securities.
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
4. TAXES
A. Federal Tax and Tax Basis Information
The timing and character of income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. Reclassifications are made to the Funds’ capital accounts for permanent tax differences to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryforwards) under income tax regulations. The amounts and characteristics of tax basis distributions and composition of distributable earnings/(accumulated losses) are finalized at fiscal year-end; accordingly, tax basis balances have not been determined as of June 30, 2023.
For the period ended December 31, 2022*, the following reclassifications, which had no impact on results of operations or net assets, were recorded to reflect permanent tax differences resulting primarily from in-kind transactions:
Fund | | Paid-in Capital | | | Total Distributable Earnings | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 2,161,187 | | | $ | (2,161,187 | ) |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | (29,644 | ) | | | 29,644 | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | (28,752,650 | ) | | | 28,752,650 | |
| * | Represents the four months ended December 31, 2022 for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF and twelve months ended December 31, 2022 for Sprott Gold Miners ETF and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF. |
The tax character of the distributions paid during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 was as follows:
| | Ordinary Income | |
December 31, 2022 | | | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 3,155,580 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | 2,518,228 | |
The tax character of the distributions paid during the four months ended December 31, 2022** and fiscal year ended August 31, 2022 were as follows:
| | Ordinary Income | |
December 31, 2022 | | | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | $ | — | |
| | | | |
| | Ordinary Income | |
August 31, 2022 | | | | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | $ | 46,290,058 | |
| ** | Effective September 6, 2022, the Board approved changing the tax year-end of the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF from August 31 to December 31. |
Under current law, capital losses maintain their character as short-term or long-term and are carried forward to the next tax year without expiration. As of December 31, 2022, the following amounts are available as carry forwards to the next tax year:
Fund | | Short-Term | | | Long-Term | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 70,180,704 | | | $ | 19,596,002 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | 34,386,131 | | | | 28,304,238 | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | 17,839,079 | | | | 9,149,319 | |
As of December 31, 2022, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis for the Fund were as follows:
| | Undistributed net investment income | | | Accumulated net realized loss on investments | | | Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | | | Total | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 81,005 | | | $ | (89,776,706 | ) | | $ | 8,399,690 | | | $ | (81,296,011 | ) |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | 1,879,876 | | | | (62,690,369 | ) | | | (10,938,985 | ) | | | (71,749,478 | ) |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | — | | | | (27,148,450 | ) | | | (199,305,218 | ) | | | (226,453,668 | ) |
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
As of December 31, 2022, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes and accumulated net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments were as follows:
| | Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | | Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | |
Gross appreciation (excess of value over tax cost) | | $ | 22,495,740 | | | $ | 6,031,076 | | | $ | (16,579,791 | ) |
Gross depreciation (excess of tax cost over value) | | | (14,094,927 | ) | | | (16,970,008 | ) | | | (182,725,427 | ) |
Net depreciation of foreign currency | | | (1,123 | ) | | | (53 | ) | | | — | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 8,399,690 | | | | (10,938,985 | ) | | | (199,305,218 | ) |
Cost of investments for income tax purposes | | $ | 246,048,399 | | | $ | 118,498,202 | | | $ | 1,068,038,045 | |
The differences between book-basis and tax-basis are primarily due to Passive Foreign Investment Company adjustments and the deferral of losses from wash sales.
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF included in the amounts reclassified a net operating loss offset to paid-in capital of $30,784,020. There was no reclassification between net operating loss and paid-in capital for Sprott Gold Miners ETF and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF.
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF elects to defer to the period ended December 31, 2023, capital losses recognized during the period from November 1 to December 31, 2022 in the amount of $160,052. Sprott Gold Miners ETF and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF had no capital losses deferred for the year ended December 31, 2022.
B. Income Taxes
No provision for income taxes is included in the accompanying financial statements, as each Fund intends to distribute to shareholders all taxable investment income and realized gains and otherwise comply with Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies. Each Fund evaluates tax positions taken (or expected to be taken) in the course of preparing the Fund’s tax returns to determine whether these positions meet a “more-likely-than-not” standard that, based on the technical merits, have a more than fifty percent likelihood of being sustained by a taxing authority upon examination. A tax position that meets the “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements.
As of and during the six months ended June 30, 2023, the Funds did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. Each Fund files U.S. federal, state, and local tax returns as required. Each Fund’s tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years after the filing of the tax return, but may extend to four years in certain jurisdictions. Tax returns for open years for the Funds have incorporated no uncertain tax positions that require a provision for income taxes.
5. LENDING OF PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
The Funds have entered into a securities lending agreement with State Street Bank & Trust Co. (“SSB”), the Funds’ lending agent. The Funds may lend their portfolio securities only to borrowers that are approved by SSB. Each Fund limits such lending to not more than 33 1/3% of the value of its total assets. Each Fund’s securities held at SSB as custodian shall be available to be lent except those securities the Fund, the Adviser, or ALPS Advisors, Inc. (the “Sub-Adviser”) specifically identifies in writing as not being available for lending. The borrower pledges and maintains with each Fund collateral consisting of cash (U.S. Dollars only), securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities, and by cash equivalents (including irrevocable bank letters of credit issued by a person other than the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower). The initial collateral received by each Fund is required to have a value of no less than 102% of the market value of the loaned securities for U.S. equity securities and a value of no less than 105% of the market value for non-U.S. equity securities. The collateral is maintained thereafter, at a market value equal to not less than 102% of the current value of the U.S. equity securities on loan and not less than 105% of the current value of the non-U.S. equity securities on loan. The market value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of each business day and any additional required collateral is delivered to each Fund on the next business day. During the term of the loan, each Fund is entitled to all distributions made on or in respect of the loaned securities. Loans of securities are terminable at any time and the borrower, after notice, is required to return borrowed securities within the customary time period for settlement of securities transactions.
Any cash collateral received is reinvested in a money market fund managed by SSB as disclosed in each Fund’s Schedule of Investments and is reflected in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities as a payable for collateral upon return of securities loaned. Non-cash collateral, in the form of securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities, is not disclosed in a Fund’s Statements of Assets and Liabilities as it is held by the lending agent on behalf of each Fund, and each Fund does not have the ability to re-hypothecate these securities. Income, less associated fees and expenses, earned by each Fund from securities lending activity is disclosed in the Statement of Operations.
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
When the Fund engages in securities lending, the Fund will retain a portion of the securities lending income and remit the remaining portion to State Street as securities lending agent as compensation for its services. Securities lending income is generally equal to the total of income earned from the reinvestment of cash collateral (and excludes collateral investment fees), and any fees or other payments to and from borrowers of securities. State Street bears all operational costs directly related to securities lending.
The following is a summary of each Fund’s securities lending agreements and related cash and non-cash collateral received as of June 30, 2023:
Fund | | Market Value of Securities on Loan | | | Cash Collateral Received | | | Non-Cash Collateral Received | | | Total Collateral Received | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 15,804,791 | | | $ | 13,468,354 | | | $ | 2,838,388 | | | $ | 16,306,742 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | 9,089,886 | | | | 6,353,686 | | | | 3,081,090 | | | | 9,434,776 | |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | | | 1,110,665 | | | | 360,042 | | | | 799,904 | | | | 1,159,946 | |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | | | 823,716 | | | | 192,008 | | | | 659,566 | | | | 851,574 | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | 67,347,770 | | | | 54,573,368 | | | | 14,448,165 | | | | 69,021,533 | |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF | | | 2,011,978 | | | | 1,543,446 | | | | 604,770 | | | | 2,148,216 | |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | | | 302,855 | | | | 357,435 | | | | 5,922 | | | | 363,357 | |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF | | | 12,800 | | | | — | | | | 13,676 | | | | 13,676 | |
The following tables reflect a breakdown of transactions accounted for as secured borrowings, the gross obligation by the type of collateral pledged or securities loaned, and the remaining contractual maturity of those transactions as of June 30, 2023:
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements | |
| | | |
Securities Lending Transactions | | Overnight & Continuous | | Up to 30 Days | | 30-90 Days | | | Greater than 90 Days | | | Total | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 13,468,354 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 13,468,354 | |
Total Borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13,468,354 | |
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending (collateral received) | | | | | | | | | | 13,468,354 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements | |
| | | |
Securities Lending Transactions | | Overnight & Continuous | | Up to 30 Days | | 30-90 Days | | | Greater than 90 Days | | | Total | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 6,353,686 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,353,686 | |
Total Borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6,353,686 | |
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending (collateral received) | | | | | | | | | | | 6,353,686 | |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | | Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements | |
| | | |
Securities Lending Transactions | | Overnight & Continuous | | Up to 30 Days | | 30-90 Days | | | Greater than 90 Days | | | Total | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 360,042 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 360,042 | |
Total Borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 360,042 | |
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending (collateral received) | | | | | | | | | | | 360,042 | |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | | Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements | |
| | | |
Securities Lending Transactions | | Overnight & Continuous | | Up to 30 Days | | 30-90 Days | | | Greater than 90 Days | | | Total | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 192,008 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 192,008 | |
Total Borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 192,008 | |
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending (collateral received) | | | | | | | | | | | 192,008 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements | |
| | | |
Securities Lending Transactions | | Overnight & Continuous | | Up to 30 Days | | 30-90 Days | | | Greater than 90 Days | | | Total | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 54,573,368 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 54,573,368 | |
Total Borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 54,573,368 | |
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending (collateral received) | | | | | | | | | | | 54,573,368 | |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF | | Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements | |
| | | |
Securities Lending Transactions | | Overnight & Continuous | | Up to 30 Days | | 30-90 Days | | | Greater than 90 Days | | | Total | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 1,543,446 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,543,446 | |
Total Borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,543,446 | |
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending (collateral received) | | | | | | | | | | | 1,543,446 | |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | | Remaining contractual maturity of the agreements | |
| | | |
Securities Lending Transactions | | Overnight & Continuous | | Up to 30 Days | | 30-90 Days | | | Greater than 90 Days | | | Total | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 357,435 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 357,435 | |
Total Borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 357,435 | |
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending (collateral received) | | | | | | | | | | | 357,435 | |
6. INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER AFFILIATED TRANSACTIONS
A. Advisory and Sub-Advisory Fees
The Adviser serves as the Funds’ investment adviser pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement with the Trust on behalf of each Fund (the “Advisory Agreement”). Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, each Fund pays the Adviser an annual management fee for the services and facilities it provides, payable on a monthly basis as a percentage of the relevant Fund’s average daily net assets as set out below.
Fund | Advisory Fee |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 0.35% |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 0.35% |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 0.65% |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 0.65% |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF: | |
Up to $500 million | 0.85% |
$500 million - $1 billion | 0.80% |
Above $1 billlion | 0.70% |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF | 0.80% |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | 0.75% |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF | 0.75% |
The Sub-Adviser serves as each Fund’s sub-adviser pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement with the Adviser and the Trust (the ’’Sub-Advisory Agreement’’). Pursuant to the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Adviser pays the Sub-Adviser a sub-advisory fee out of the Adviser’s advisory fee for the services it provides. The fee is payable on a monthly basis at the annual rate of the relevant Fund’s average daily net assets as set out below:
Average Assets* | Sub-Advisory Fee** |
Up to $250 million | 0.04% |
$250 million-$500 million | 0.03% |
Above $500 million | 0.02% |
| * | Subject to the following annual minimums per fund sub-advised by the Sub-Adviser for Sprott: (i) first two funds: $40,000 per fund; (ii) additional funds: $30,000 per fund. |
| ** | Annual rate stated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the Funds. |
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
B. Fee Waiver Arrangement
For the Sprott Gold Miners ETF and the Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF, the Adviser is paid a monthly management fee at an annual rate (stated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of each Fund) of 0.35%. The Adviser has contractually agreed to waive the management fee, and/or reimburse expenses so that total annual operating expenses of these funds after fee waiver/expense reimbursements (not including distribution (12b-1) fees, shareholder service fees, acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed a maximum of 0.50% of the shares average daily net assets through April 30, 2024. The Adviser will be permitted to recover expenses it has borne to the extent that the Funds expenses in later periods fall below the annual rates set forth in the expense agreement. These Funds’ fee waiver/expense reimbursement arrangements with the Adviser permit the Adviser to recapture only if any such recapture payments do not cause the Funds’ expense ratio (after recapture) to exceed the lesser of (i) the expense cap in effect at the time of the waiver and (ii) the expense cap in effect at the time of the recapture. The Funds will not be obligated to pay any such deferred fees and expenses more than three years after the particular date in which the fees and expenses was deferred. This expense agreement may only be terminated by the Board of Trustees of Sprott Funds Trust during the period.
For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the fees waived and recoupment of previously waived fees were as follows:
| | Fees waived by Adviser | | | Expense Recoupment of Previously Waived Fees | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 53,164 | | | $ | 60,800 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | 84,959 | | | | 38,105 | |
As of June 30, 2023, the balance of recoupable expenses for the Funds were as follows:
| | Expires December 31, 2023 | | | Expires December 31, 2024 | | | Expires December 31, 2025 | | | Expires December 31, 2026 | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 51,321 | | | $ | 53,164 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | 124,007 | | | | 134,456 | | | | 210,117 | | | | 84,959 | |
C. Unitary Fee Arrangement
Under the Investment Advisory Agreement for all of the Funds other than the Sprott Gold Miners ETF and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF, the Adviser has agreed to pay all expenses incurred by the Fund except for the advisory fee, interest, taxes, brokerage commissions and other expenses incurred in placing orders for the purchase and sale of securities and other investment instruments, acquired fund fees and expenses, accrued deferred tax liability, extraordinary expenses, and distribution fees and expenses paid by the Fund under any distribution plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act.
7. TRUSTEES OF THE TRUST
The Board consists of five Trustees, four of whom are not “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Trust (“Independent Trustees”), and one of whom is an interested person. Each current Independent Trustee is paid an annual retainer of $65,000 for his or her services as a Board member to the Trust and another trust in the fund complex, together with out-of-pocket expenses in accordance with the Board’s policy on travel and other business expenses relating to attendance at meetings.
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
8. PURCHASES AND SALES OF SECURITIES
For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments and in-kind transactions, were as follows:
Fund | | Purchases | | | Sales | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 76,516,876 | | | $ | 74,820,157 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | 44,291,476 | | | | 44,426,372 | |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF* | | | 1,346,120 | | | | 1,031,027 | |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF* | | | 1,450,901 | | | | 1,111,762 | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | 45,296,527 | | | | 49,784,440 | |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF* | | | 2,887,037 | | | | 2,378,164 | |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF* | | | 1,058,245 | | | | 499,696 | |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF* | | | 335,430 | | | | 274,535 | |
For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the cost of in-kind purchases and proceeds from in-kind sales were as follows:
Fund | | Purchases | | | Sales | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 22,075,912 | | | $ | 19,454,844 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | 1,673,821 | | | | 6,802,401 | |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF* | | | 8,879,115 | | | | 1,326,687 | |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF* | | | 5,893,741 | | | | 2,622,971 | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | 83,049,662 | | | | 40,192,633 | |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF* | | | 34,503,869 | | | | — | |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF* | | | 2,274,493 | | | | — | |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF* | | | 1,590,515 | | | | — | |
For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the net realized gains/(losses) on in-kind transactions were as follow:
Fund | | Net Realized Gain/(Loss) | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 5,865,598 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | 1,838,343 | |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF* | | | 61,490 | |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF* | | | 520,868 | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | 4,586,033 | |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF* | | | — | |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF* | | | — | |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF* | | | — | |
| * | Represents the activities since inception through June 30, 2023. |
Gains on in-kind transactions are not considered taxable for federal income tax purposes and losses on in-kind transactions are also not deductible for tax purposes.
9. CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS
Shares are created and redeemed by each Fund only in Creation Unit size aggregations of 10,000 Shares. Only broker-dealers or large institutional investors with creation and redemption agreements called Authorized Participants (“AP”) are permitted to purchase or redeem Creation Units from the Funds. Such transactions are generally permitted on an in-kind basis, with a balancing cash component to equate the transaction to the NAV per unit of each Fund on the transaction date. Cash may be substituted for the equivalent value of certain securities, generally when they are not available in sufficient quantity for delivery, not eligible for trading by the AP or as a result of other market circumstances.
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Each Fund may engage in cross trades with other funds in the Trust pursuant to Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act. Cross trading is the buying or selling of portfolio securities between funds to which the Adviser serves as the investment adviser. The Board has adopted procedures that apply to transactions between the funds of the Trust pursuant to Rule 17a-7. It has been reported to the Board that these transactions related to cross trades during the period complied with the requirements set forth by Rule 17a-7 and the Trust’s procedures.
Notes to Financial Statements | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Transactions related to cross trades during the period ended June 30, 2023 were as follows:
Fund | | Purchase Cost Paid | | | Sale Proceeds Received | | | Realized Gain/(Loss) on Sales | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 1,862,969 | | | $ | 514,182 | | | $ | 116,440 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | | 514,183 | | | | 1,862,969 | | | | (103,369 | ) |
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF* | | | 120,404 | | | | 110,618 | | | | 916 | |
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF* | | | 152,882 | | | | 1,995 | | | | 869 | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | | 354,502 | | | | ─ | | | | ─ | |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF* | | | 14,693 | | | | 470,081 | | | | 4,465 | |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF* | | | 1,442 | | | | ─ | | | | ─ | |
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF* | | | 2,130 | | | | 63,361 | | | | 11,865 | |
| * | Represents the Purchases and Sales since inception through June 30, 2023. |
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Funds have evaluated the need for disclosures and/or adjustments resulting from subsequent events that occurred between June 30, 2023 and the date the financial statements were issued.
Effective July 1, 2023, Sprott Asset Management USA Inc. replaced Sprott Asset Management LP as investment adviser to each Fund. Both companies are subsidiaries of Sprott Inc.
Additional Information | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
PROXY VOTING RECORDS, POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Information regarding how each Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period and a description of the Funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures used in determining how to vote for proxies are available without charge on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and upon request, by calling (toll-free) 888.622.1813.
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
The Trust is required to disclose, after its first and third fiscal quarters, the complete schedule of each Fund’s portfolio holdings with the SEC as an exhibit to its report on Form N-PORT. Form N-PORT reports for each Fund will be available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Each Fund’s Form N-PORT reports will be available without charge, upon request, by calling (toll-free) 888.622.1813.
TAX INFORMATION
Pursuant to Section 853(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Funds designated the following for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022:
| | Foreign Taxes Paid | | | Foreign Source Income | |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 548,410 | | | $ | 3,807,203 | |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | | $ | 93,792 | | | $ | 1,219,284 | |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
The Funds designate the following for federal income tax purposes for distributions made during the calendar year ended December 31, 2022:
| QDI | DRD |
Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 89.35% | 37.92% |
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 32.52% | 0.00% |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
In early 2023, if applicable, shareholders of record received this information for the distribution paid to them by the Funds during the calendar year 2022 via Form 1099. The Funds will notify shareholders in early 2024 of amounts paid to them by the Funds, if any, during the calendar year 2023.
LICENSING AGREEMENTS
The Adviser has entered into licensing agreements on behalf of: (i) the Sprott Gold Miners ETF and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF with Solactive AG, (ii) the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF with North Shore Indices Inc.; and (iii) the Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF, Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF, Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF with Nasdaq, Inc. (Solactive AG, North Shore Indices Inc. and Nasdaq, Inc. are each a “Licensor” and, collectively, the “Licensors”). Each of the Funds’ underlying index name trademark is owned by the applicable Licensor. These trademarks have been licensed to the Adviser for use by the Funds. Each Fund is entitled to use its underlying index pursuant to the Trust’s sub-licensing agreement with the Adviser.
The Funds are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by the Licensors, and each Licensor makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any of the Funds.
Trustees & Officers | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES |
| |
Name, Address1 and Birth Year | Position(s) Held with the Trust | Term of Office2 and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Number of Portfolios in the Fund Complex Overseen | Other Directorships Held By Trustee |
Leslie Barrett, 1965 | Trustee | Since April, 2022 | Senior Software Engineer at Bloomberg LP specializing in Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning since 2012. | 10 | None |
Michael W. Clark, 1959 | Trustee | Since September, 2018 | Private Investor since 2023; Partner Hourglass Vineyards since 2004; President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Head of Executive Committee, and member of Board of Directors of Chilton Investment Company from 2005 to December 2022. | 10 | None |
Peyton T. Muldoon, 1969 | Trustee | Since September, 2018 | Licensed salesperson, Sotheby’s International Realty, a global real estate brokerage firm since 2011. | 10 | None |
James R. Pierce, Jr., 1956 | Trustee | Since September, 2018 | Retired Since December 2022; Former Chairman of Marsh JLT Specialty Insurance Services, from September 2014 to December 2022. | 10 | None |
| 1. | The address for each Trustee is 320 Post Road, Suite 230, Darien, CT 06820. |
| 2. | Each Trustee serves until resignation, death, retirement or removal. |
Trustees & Officers | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
INTERESTED TRUSTEE AND OFFICERS |
|
Name, Address1 and Birth Year | Position(s) Held with the Trust | Term of Office2 and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Number of Portfolios in the Fund Complex Overseen | Other Directorships Held By Trustee |
John Ciampaglia, 1970 | Trustee | Since September, 2018 | Senior Managing Partner of Sprott Inc. and Chief Executive Officer of Sprott Asset Management, LP. (Since 2010) | 9 | None |
Thomas W. Ulrich, 1963 | President, Secretary, Chief Compliance Officer | Since September, 2018 | Managing Partner, Sprott Inc. group of companies since January 2018, Chief Compliance Officer of Sprott Asset Management USA Inc. (since October, 2012); Chief Compliance Officer of Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd. (October 2012 to December 2022). | N/A | N/A |
Varinder Bhathal, 1971 | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer | Since September, 2018 | Chief Financial Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP (since December 2018); Managing Partner, Corporate Finance and Investment Operations of Sprott Inc. (since October 2017); Vice President, Finance of Sprott Inc. (December 2015 to October 2017). | N/A | N/A |
| 1. | The address for each Trustee and officer is 320 Post Road, Suite 230, Darien, CT 06820. |
| 2. | Each Trustee serves until resignation, death, retirement or removal. |
The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Funds’ Trustees and is available free of charge at www.sprottetfs.com, or upon request by calling the Fund toll free at 1-888-622-1813.
Board Review and Approval of Investment | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements | |
Board Approval of Investment Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements for Sprott Funds Trust (Sprott ETFs)
The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Sprott Funds Trust (the “Trust”) on behalf of its series, Sprott Gold Miners ETF, Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF, Sprott Uranium Miners ETF, Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF, Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF, Sprott Nickel Miners ETF, and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (each a “Fund” and, collectively, the “Funds”) met in person at a regularly scheduled meeting on June 9, 2023, in Watch Hill, Rhode Island, for purposes of, among other things, considering whether it would be in the best interests of each Fund and its shareholders for the Board to approve the Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement by and between the Funds and Sprott Asset Management USA, Inc. (“SAM USA” or the “Adviser”) (the “Advisory Agreement”), and the Amended Sub-Advisory Agreement by and among the Funds, SAM USA, Inc. and ALPS Advisors, Inc. (“ALPS” or the “Sub-Adviser”) (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement” and, together with the Advisory Agreement, the “Agreements”). SAM USA together with ALPS are collectively referred to as the “Advisers.”
In connection with the Board’s review of the Agreements, the Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Funds within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”) requested, and the Advisers provided the Board with, information about a variety of matters, including, without limitation, the following information:
| ● | Nature, extent and quality of services to be provided by the Advisers, including background information on the qualifications and experience of key professional of the Advisers’ personnel that provide services to the Funds; |
| ● | Investment performance of the Funds, including the extent to which the Funds tracked their respective benchmark indexes; |
| ● | Fees charged to and expenses of the Funds, including comparative fee and expense information for registered investment companies similar to the Funds; |
| ● | Costs of the services provided, and profits realized by the Advisers; and |
At the June 9, 2023 meeting, the Board, including the Independent Trustees determined that the continuation of the Agreements was in the best interests of each Fund in light of the services, personnel, expenses and such other matters as the Board considered to be relevant in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment and approved them.
To reach this determination, the Board considered its duties under the 1940 Act as well as under the general principles of state law in reviewing and approving advisory contracts; the fiduciary duty of investment advisers with respect to advisory agreements and the receipt of investment advisory compensation; the standards used by courts in determining whether investment company boards have fulfilled their duties; and the factors to be considered by the Board in voting on such agreements. To assist the Board in its evaluation of each of the Agreements, the Independent Trustees received materials in advance of the Board meeting from the Advisers. The Board applied its business judgment to determine whether the arrangements by and among each Fund, SAM USA and ALPS are reasonable business arrangements from each Fund’s perspective as well as from the perspective of its respective shareholders.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided
Sprott Asset Management USA, Inc.
The Board reviewed material provided by the Adviser related to the proposed approval of the Advisory Agreement at its meeting on June 9, 2023. The Board noted that the Adviser manages approximately $2.0 billion in assets of December 31, 2023, and provides investment management services on a discretionary basis to its clients, which include individuals and institutions with separately managed accounts. The Board further noted that the Adviser and the predecessor investment adviser of the Fund were each wholly-owned subsidiaries of Sprott, Inc. and both entities shared personnel and resources as they were part of the same organization. The Board reviewed the credentials of the key investment personnel that would be responsible for servicing the Fund, noting that each had considerable experience in the asset management industry. The Board also noted the fact that the change from one adviser to an affiliated adviser would not affect the back office, outsourced vendors, or management of the Funds, or the oversight of the Sub-Adviser. The Board agreed that the Adviser’s services and ability to manage the Trust and each Fund had not materially changed with this internal corporate change. The Board discussed the responsibilities of the Adviser with respect to the Funds, including compliance, analysis and certain administrative services. The Board reviewed the Adviser’s research capabilities and the quality of its compliance infrastructure. The Board discussed the Adviser’s oversight of the Sub-Adviser, which included oversight of the Sub-Adviser’s adherence to each Fund’s investment strategies and restrictions, trading, and compliance monitoring. The Board concluded that the Adviser had sufficient quality and depth of personnel, resources, investment methods and compliance policies and procedures essential to perform its duties under the Advisory Agreement and that the nature, overall quality and extent of the management services to be provided by the Adviser to the Funds would be satisfactory.
ALPS Advisors, Inc.
The Board reviewed materials provided by the Sub-Adviser, which included a description of any material changes to its business operations since the Board last reviewed the Sub-Advisory Agreement. The Board reviewed the background information of key investment personnel responsible for the servicing the Funds, considering their education and financial industry experience. The Board discussed the responsibilities of the Sub-Adviser with respect to the Funds noting that the Sub-Adviser was responsible for monitoring and taking action on any events which would require trading in order to keep each Fund in line with its respective benchmark index and/or model portfolios. The Board further noted the Sub-Adviser reported no material compliance or litigation issues since the sub-advisory agreement was last renewed. The Board also noted the fact that the change of Funds’ investment adviser to an affiliated adviser had not material impact on the advisory services provided by the Sub-Adviser to the Funds. The Board concluded that the Sub-Adviser continued providing a high level of quality service to the Fund and its shareholders.
Board Review and Approval of Investment | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements | |
Investment Performance
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
The Board considered the performance of the Fund with respect to its benchmark index. The Board evaluated the correlation and tracking error between the Fund and its benchmark index. The Board noted that since inception, the Fund’s performance generally conformed to the performance of its respective benchmark index, but that the performance of the Fund did not precisely track its index during all periods. The Board considered the various factors that contributed to the slight tracking error, such as certain fees and expenses borne by the Fund, cash holdings and currency conversions, and concluded that the tracking error for the Fund appeared reasonable. The Board agreed that the Adviser and Sub-Adviser had the potential to continue to manage the Fund to perform in line with its respective index.
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
The Board considered the performance of the Fund with respect to its benchmark index. The Board evaluated the correlation and tracking error between the Fund and its benchmark index. The Board noted that since inception, the Fund’s performance generally conformed to the performance of its respective benchmark index, but that the performance of the Fund did not precisely track its index during all periods. The Board considered the various factors that contributed to the slight tracking error, such as certain fees and expenses borne by the Fund, cash holdings and currency conversions, and concluded that the tracking error for the Fund appeared reasonable. The Board agreed that the Adviser and Sub-Adviser had the potential to continue to manage the Fund to perform in line with its respective index.
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
The Board considered the performance of the Fund with respect to its benchmark index. The Board evaluated the correlation and tracking error between the Fund and its benchmark index. The Board noted that since inception, the Fund’s performance generally conformed to the performance of its respective benchmark index, but that the performance of each Fund did not precisely track its index during all periods. The Board considered the various factors that contributed to the slight tracking error, such as certain fees and expenses borne by the Funds, cash holdings and currency conversions, and concluded that the tracking error for each Fund appeared reasonable. The Board agreed that the Adviser and Sub-Adviser had the potential to continue to manage the Fund to perform in line with its respective index.
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF/Sprott Lithium Miners ETF/Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF/Sprott Nickel Miners ETF and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
The Board noted the Funds have not been in existence long enough to have a meaningful performance track record, including the evaluation of the correlation and tracking error between each Fund and its benchmark index.
Fees and Expenses
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
The Board noted the advisory fee for the Fund was 0.35% and is below the averages and medians of its peer group and Morningstar category. The Board further noted that the Fund’s net expense ratio of 0.50% was also slightly below the peer group and Morningstar category average and median. The Board noted, with respect to the advisory fee, that the peers presented in the Broadridge report, unlike the Fund paid unitary fees and thus a portion of the advisory fee was used to pay non-adviser service provider expenses. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a gold miners fund and the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund.
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not Sprott Gold Miners ETF. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services provided to the Sprott Gold Miners ETF, and concluded that the advisory fee and net expense ratio of the Fund were not unreasonable.
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
The Board noted that the Adviser charged a 0.35% advisory fee for the Fund and had a net expense ratio of 0.50%. The Board considered that the management fee and net expense ratio were both below the peer group and Morningstar category average and median. With respect to the advisory fee, the Board noted that the peer funds unlike the Fund paid unitary fees and thus a portion of the advisory fee was used to pay non-adviser service provider expenses. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a gold miners fund and the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund.
Board Review and Approval of Investment | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements | |
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services provided to the Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee of 0.83% and net expense ratio of 0.83% is at the category high for both its peer group and Morningstar category. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a uranium miners fund and the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund.
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not Sprott Uranium Miners ETF. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services provided to the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
The Board noted that the advisory fee for the Fund was a unitary fee, and as such, the expense ratio for the Fund is also 0.65% and the Adviser agrees to pay the operating costs of the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee and expense ratio ranked towards the high end but was within the range of peers in both categories. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage an energy transition materials fund, the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track and the Adviser’s role in creating such index. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund. The Board considered the risks borne by the Adviser associated with providing services to the Fund, including the entrepreneurial risk associated with sponsoring new funds, as well as the enterprise risk emanating from litigation and reputational risks, operational and business risks, and other risks associated with the ongoing management of the Fund.
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not the Fund. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services to be provided to the Fund, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
The Board noted that the advisory fee for the Fund was a unitary fee, and as such, the expense ratio for the Fund is also 0.75% and the Adviser agrees to pay the operating costs of the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee and expense ratio ranked towards the high end but was within the range of peers in both categories. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a copper fund, the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track and the Adviser’s role in creating such index. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund. The Board considered the risks borne by the Adviser associated with providing services to the Fund, including the entrepreneurial risk associated with sponsoring new funds, as well as the enterprise risk emanating from litigation and reputational risks, operational and business risks, and other risks associated with the ongoing management of the Fund.
Board Review and Approval of Investment | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements | |
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not the Fund. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services to be provided to the Fund, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
The Board noted that the advisory fee for the Fund was a unitary fee, and as such, the expense ratio for the Fund is also 0.75% and the Adviser agrees to pay the operating costs of the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee and expense ratio ranked towards the high end but was within the range of peers in both categories. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a nickel fund, the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track and the Adviser’s role in creating such index. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund. The Board considered the risks borne by the Adviser associated with providing services to the Fund, including the entrepreneurial risk associated with sponsoring new funds, as well as the enterprise risk emanating from litigation and reputational risks, operational and business risks, and other risks associated with the ongoing management of the Fund.
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not the Fund. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services to be provided to the Fund, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
The Board noted that the advisory fee for the Fund was a unitary fee, and as such, the expense ratio for the Fund is also 0.65% and the Adviser agrees to pay the operating costs of the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee and expense ratio ranked towards the high end but was within the range of peers in both categories. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a lithium fund, the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track and the Adviser’s role in creating such index. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund. The Board considered the risks borne by the Adviser associated with providing services to the Fund, including the entrepreneurial risk associated with sponsoring new funds, as well as the enterprise risk emanating from litigation and reputational risks, operational and business risks, and other risks associated with the ongoing management of the Fund.
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not the Fund. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services to be provided to the Fund, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Board Review and Approval of Investment | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements | |
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
The Board noted that the advisory fee for the Fund was a unitary fee, and as such, the expense ratio for the Fund is also 0.80% and the Adviser agrees to pay the operating costs of the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee and expense ratio ranked towards the high end but was within the range of peers in both categories. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a uranium fund, the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track and the Adviser’s role in creating such index. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund. The Board considered the risks borne by the Adviser associated with providing services to the Fund, including the entrepreneurial risk associated with sponsoring new funds, as well as the enterprise risk emanating from litigation and reputational risks, operational and business risks, and other risks associated with the ongoing management of the Fund.
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not the Fund. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services to be provided to the Fund, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Profitability
Sprott Asset Management USA, Inc.
The Board reviewed the pro forma profitability analysis provided by the Adviser and noted that the predecessor affiliated adviser did not earn a profit on Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF, Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF, Sprott Nickel Miners ETF, and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF, given their small asset size since they were recently launched. The Board noted that the predecessor affiliated adviser earned a profit on Sprott Gold Miners ETF, Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF, and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF with respect to its management of the Funds. The Board discussed the Adviser’s contractual fee waiver arrangement with respect Sprott Gold Miners ETF and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (“Gold Funds”), which effectively results in the Gold Funds only being charged for their respective investment advisory fees. The Board after reviewing pro forma profitability information about the Adviser, noting the similar cost structure to its affiliated predecessor adviser, and concluded that the advisory fee paid by each Fund to the Adviser was not unreasonable.
ALPS Advisors, Inc.
The Board reviewed the profitability analysis provided by the Sub-Adviser with respect to its management of the Funds. The Board noted that the Sub-Adviser earned a modest profit from the management of the Sprott ETFs in aggregate. The Board concluded that excessive profitability was not an issue at this time.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the existence of any economies of scale in the provisions of the services by the Advisers and whether those economies were shared with the Funds through breakpoints in its management fees or other means, such as expense caps or fee waivers. The Board also considered the extent to which each Fund benefits from such economies of scale and whether there should be changes in the advisory fee rate or breakpoint structure in order to enable the Funds to more fully participate in these economies of scale. The Board considered each Fund’s asset levels and whether the current fee schedule was appropriate. The Board concluded that the current fee structure for each Fund was reasonable and that no changes were necessary.
Conclusion
Having requested and received such information from the adviser as the Board believed to be reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the advisory agreement, and as assisted by the advice of counsel, the Board concluded that renewal of the advisory agreement was in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders.
Board Review and Approval of Investment | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements | |
Board Approval of Investment Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements for Sprott Funds Trust (Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF, Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF, Sprott Nickel Miners ETF, Sprott Lithium ETF and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF)
The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Sprott Funds Trust (the “Trust”) on behalf of its series Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF, Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF, Sprott Nickel Miners ETF, Sprott Lithium Miners ETF and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (each a “Fund” and, collectively, the “Funds”) met in person on December 5, 2022, for purposes of, among other things, considering whether it would be in the best interests of the Funds and their respective shareholders for the Board to approve an Investment Advisory Agreement by and between the Trust, on behalf of the Funds, and Sprott Asset Management L.P. (“SAM” or the “Adviser”) (the “Advisory Agreement”), and an Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement by and among SAM and ALPS Advisors, Inc. (“ALPS” or the “Sub-Adviser”), with respect to the Funds (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement” and, together with the Advisory Agreement, the “Agreements”). SAM together with ALPS are collectively referred to as the “Advisers.”
In connection with the Board’s review of the Agreements, the Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Funds within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”) requested, and the Advisers provided the Board with information about a variety of matters, including, without limitation, the following information:
| ● | Nature, extent and quality of services to be provided by the Advisers, including background information on the qualifications and experience of key professional of the Advisers’ personnel that provide services to the Funds; |
| ● | Fees charged to and expenses of each Fund, including comparative fee and expense information for registered investment companies similar to the Fund; |
| ● | Costs of the services provided, and profits realized by the Advisers; and |
At the December 5, 2022 meeting, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, determined that the continuation of the Agreements was in the best interests of the Funds in light of the services, personnel, expenses and such other matters as the Board considered to be relevant in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment and approved them.
To reach this determination, the Board considered its duties under the 1940 Act as well as under the general principles of state law in reviewing and approving advisory contracts; the fiduciary duty of investment advisers with respect to advisory agreements and the receipt of investment advisory compensation; the standards used by courts in determining whether investment company boards have fulfilled their duties; and the factors to be considered by the Board in voting on such agreements. To assist the Board in its evaluation of each of the Agreements, the Independent Trustees received materials in advance of the Board meeting from the Advisers including a report prepared by an independent third party, comparing each Fund’s advisory fee to those paid by a group of peer funds. The Board applied its business judgment to determine whether the arrangements by and among the Funds, SAM and ALPS are reasonable business arrangements from each Fund’s perspective as well as from the perspective of its shareholders.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided
Sprott Asset Management L.P.
The Board acknowledged that the Adviser served as investment adviser to all other series in the Trust, including three passively managed exchange traded funds. The Board reviewed materials provided by the Adviser, which included a description of the Adviser’s business operations and its personnel. The Board discussed the extensive responsibilities of the Adviser with respect to the Funds, including compliance, index tracking oversight, financial reporting, operations, risk and performance monitoring and sales and marketing support. The Board reviewed the Adviser’s research capabilities and the quality of its compliance infrastructure. The Board commented favorably on the experience and credentials of the personnel at the Adviser who will service the Funds. The Board acknowledged the Adviser’s experience and expertise in energy transition materials and metals mining markets. The Board discussed the Adviser’s oversight of the Sub-Adviser, which included oversight of the Sub-Adviser’s adherence to each Fund’s investment strategies and restrictions, trading, and compliance monitoring. Additionally, the Board received satisfactory responses from the representatives of the Adviser with respect to whether the Adviser was involved in any additional lawsuits or regulatory actions. The Board reviewed the description provided on the practices for monitoring compliance with the Trust’s investment limitations. The Board concluded that the Adviser had sufficient quality and depth of personnel, resources, investment methods and compliance policies and procedures essential to perform its duties under the Advisory Agreement and that the nature, overall quality and extent of the management services to be provided by the Adviser to the Funds would be satisfactory.
ALPS Advisors, Inc.
The Board acknowledged that the Sub-Adviser served as the investment sub-adviser to all other series in the Trust which were exchange traded funds. The Board reviewed materials provided by the Sub-Adviser, which included a description of its business operations and personnel. The Board discussed the responsibilities of the Sub-Adviser with respect to the Funds noting that the Sub-Adviser was responsible for monitoring and taking action on any events which would require trading in order to keep each Fund in line with its benchmark index. The Board considered the experience of the portfolio management and research personnel of the Sub-Adviser, including their experience in the investment field, education and industry credentials. The Board commented that the portfolio managers for the Funds were already managing the other exchange traded funds in the Trust. The Board reviewed the research and monitoring services provided by the Sub-Adviser, noting that the Sub-Adviser would perform daily monitoring of each Fund’s index tracking and compliance with investment limitations. The Board received satisfactory responses from the Sub-Adviser with respect to a series of questions, including: whether the Sub-Adviser was involved in any new lawsuits or regulatory actions. The Board discussed the Sub-Adviser’s compliance structure and broker-dealer selection process and reviewed the compliance materials provided by the Sub-Adviser. After further discussion the Board concluded that the Sub-Adviser had sufficient quality and depth of personnel, resources, investment methods and compliance policies and procedures essential to perform its duties under the Sub-Advisory Agreement and that the nature, overall quality and extent of investment management services to be provided to the Funds would be satisfactory.
Board Review and Approval of Investment | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements | |
Investment Performance
The Board noted that each Fund had not yet commenced operations and thus did not have any performance information to review. The Board discussed the Advisory and Sub-Advisory personnel that would manage the Funds and agreed that the Adviser and Sub-Adviser had the potential to manage the Fund to perform in line with its index.
Fees and Expenses
The Board discussed the proposed investment unitary fee for each Fund.
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
The Board noted that the advisory fee for the Fund was a unitary fee, and as such, the expense ratio for the Fund is also 0.65% and the Adviser agrees to pay the operating costs of the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee and expense ratio ranked towards the high end but was within the range of peers in both categories. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage an energy transition materials fund, the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track and the Adviser’s role in creating such index. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund. The Board considered the risks borne by the Adviser associated with providing services to the Fund, including the entrepreneurial risk associated with sponsoring new funds, as well as the enterprise risk emanating from litigation and reputational risks, operational and business risks, and other risks associated with the ongoing management of the Fund.
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not the Fund. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services to be provided to the Fund, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
The Board noted that the advisory fee for the Fund was a unitary fee, and as such, the expense ratio for the Fund is also 0.75% and the Adviser agrees to pay the operating costs of the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee and expense ratio ranked towards the high end but was within the range of peers in both categories. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a copper fund, the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track and the Adviser’s role in creating such index. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund. The Board considered the risks borne by the Adviser associated with providing services to the Fund, including the entrepreneurial risk associated with sponsoring new funds, as well as the enterprise risk emanating from litigation and reputational risks, operational and business risks, and other risks associated with the ongoing management of the Fund.
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not the Fund. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
Board Review and Approval of Investment | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements | |
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services to be provided to the Fund, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
The Board noted that the advisory fee for the Fund was a unitary fee, and as such, the expense ratio for the Fund is also 0.75% and the Adviser agrees to pay the operating costs of the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee and expense ratio ranked towards the high end but was within the range of peers in both categories. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a nickel fund, the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track and the Adviser’s role in creating such index. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund. The Board considered the risks borne by the Adviser associated with providing services to the Fund, including the entrepreneurial risk associated with sponsoring new funds, as well as the enterprise risk emanating from litigation and reputational risks, operational and business risks, and other risks associated with the ongoing management of the Fund.
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not the Fund. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services to be provided to the Fund, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
The Board noted that the advisory fee for the Fund was a unitary fee, and as such, the expense ratio for the Fund is also 0.65% and the Adviser agrees to pay the operating costs of the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee and expense ratio ranked towards the high end but was within the range of peers in both categories. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a lithium fund, the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track and the Adviser’s role in creating such index. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund. The Board considered the risks borne by the Adviser associated with providing services to the Fund, including the entrepreneurial risk associated with sponsoring new funds, as well as the enterprise risk emanating from litigation and reputational risks, operational and business risks, and other risks associated with the ongoing management of the Fund.
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not the Fund. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services to be provided to the Fund, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
The Board noted that the advisory fee for the Fund was a unitary fee, and as such, the expense ratio for the Fund is also 0.80% and the Adviser agrees to pay the operating costs of the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund’s advisory fee and expense ratio ranked towards the high end but was within the range of peers in both categories. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage a uranium fund, the sophistication of the index that the Fund would track and the Adviser’s role in creating such index. The Board took into consideration that the advisory fee for the Fund is a “unitary fee,” meaning that the Fund pays no expenses other than the advisory fee and certain expenses customarily excluded from unitary fee arrangements, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, and interest. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, the Adviser will be responsible for compensating the Fund’s other service providers and paying the Fund’s other expenses out of its own fee and resources. The Board further determined that the fees reflected a reasonable allocation of the advisory fee between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, given the work to be performed by each. The Board considered information provided about the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Adviser in providing advisory services, evaluated the compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, and reviewed a profitability analysis from the Adviser with respect to the Fund. The Board considered the risks borne by the Adviser associated with providing services to the Fund, including the entrepreneurial risk associated with sponsoring new funds, as well as the enterprise risk emanating from litigation and reputational risks, operational and business risks, and other risks associated with the ongoing management of the Fund.
Board Review and Approval of Investment | June 30, 2023 (Unaudited) |
Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements | |
With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Board considered that the Sub-Advisory fee was paid by the Adviser and not the Fund. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisory fee charged by the Sub-Adviser was lower than the fees it charged to certain other funds.
The Board considered the fee and expense comparison information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser and the services to be provided to the Fund, and concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund were reasonable.
Profitability
Sprott Asset Management L.P.
The Board reviewed the profitability analysis provided by the Adviser with respect to its proposed management of the Funds. The Board noted that the Adviser is not expected to earn a profit from managing any Fund during its initial phase of operations. The Board discussed the unitary fee arrangement for each Fund, which required the Adviser to pay most of the operating expenses of the Fund including fees charged by the Fund’s service providers. The Board discussed the expertise required to manage the Funds and determined that the anticipated profitability for the Adviser did not appear unreasonable.
ALPS Advisors, Inc.
The Board reviewed the pro-forma profitability analysis provided by the Sub-Adviser with respect to its management of the Funds. The Board noted that the Sub-Adviser expected to earn a profit from the management of all exchanged traded funds in the Trust in the aggregate. The Board concluded that excessive profitability was not an issue at this time.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the existence of any economies of scale in the provisions of the services by the Advisers and whether those economies were shared with the Funds through breakpoints in its management fees or other means, such as expense caps or fee waivers. The Board also considered the extent to which each Fund benefits from such economies of scale and whether there should be changes in the advisory fee rate or breakpoint structure in order to enable the Funds to more fully participate in these economies of scale. The Board considered each Fund’s asset levels and whether the current fee schedule was appropriate. The Board concluded that the current fee structure for each Fund was reasonable and that no changes were necessary.
Conclusion
It was noted that no single factor was cited as determinative to the decision of the Trustees. Rather, after weighing all of the considerations and conclusions discussed above, the entire Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, approved the Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, concluding that approval of the Agreements was in the best interest of the shareholders of each Fund and that the investment advisory fee rate was reasonable in relation to the services provided.
This material must be preceded or accompanied by the Prospectus.
www.sprott.com
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable to this filing.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable to this filing.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not applicable to this filing.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable to this filing.
Item 6. Investments.
| (a) | See Schedule of Investments in Item 1. |
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to this filing.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to this filing.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable to this filing.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant’s Board implemented after the Registrant last provided disclosure in response to this Item.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
| (a) | The Registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)(17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)). |
| (b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to this filing.
Item 13. Exhibits.
| (a) | (1) | Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Not applicable to this filing. |
| (a)(3) | Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 – Not Applicable to this filing. |
| (a)(4) | Change in Registrant’s independent public accountant – Not Applicable to this filing. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| SPROTT FUNDS TRUST | |
| | | |
| By: | /s/ Thomas W. Ulrich | |
| | Thomas W. Ulrich, President | |
| | | |
| Date: September 7, 2023 | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| By: | /s/ Thomas W. Ulrich | |
| | Thomas W. Ulrich, President | |
| | | |
| Date: September 7, 2023 | |
| By: | /s/ Varinder Bhathal | |
| | Varinder Bhathal, Treasurer | |
| | | |
| Date: September 7, 2023 | |