47
increased legal and financial costs to comply with the additional associated
reporting requirements, which could negatively
impact the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations.
The Company may,
from time to
time be involved
in legal proceedings.
The Company
is not involved
in any legal
proceedings which, individually or in the aggregate, would be material to the Company’s consolidated financial condition or
results of operations, except as follows:
The Company filed
an originating
application on
August 11,
2022, petitioning
the Quebec
Superior Court to
order
P. Riopel (1993) Inc. to convey title
of the property
bearing civic address
5655 Philippe-Turcot, Montreal, Quebec, H4C
3K8.
The
property
is
the
location
of
one
of
the
Company’s
two
manufacturing
facilities.
The
petition
followed
the
Company’s
exercise of
its contractual
option to
purchase the
property for
$2,750,000. On
December 23,
2022, P.
Riopel (1993)
Inc.
filed a counterclaim in which it
sought damages in the
amount of $415,425, alleging that
the Company breached the lease
agreement between the parties.
On July 28, 2021,
an application for a
safeguard order and permanent
injunction was filed by
AirScience Systems
Inc. (“
ASSI
”) before the
Quebec Superior
Court against
Gas RNG Systems
Inc. (“
RNG Canada
”), RNG Investments
Inc.,
Glauber Equipment
Corporation, Mr.
Peter Glauber
and Mr.
Shivaji Ramalingam
(collectively,
the “Defendants”).
ASSI is
seeking
an
oppression
remedy,
alleging
the
wrongful
expulsion
of
ASSI
as
a
shareholder
and
Mr.
Gérard
Magnin
as
a
director from RNG Canada. On April 29,
2022, the Defendants filed a defence and a
counterclaim against ASSI, AirScience
AST
”)
(now
Pyro
Green-Gas
Inc.,
a
wholly-owned
subsidiary
of
the
Company)
and
Mr.
Magnin
for
allegedly breaching their
obligations with respect
to a unanimous
shareholder agreement
governing RNG Canada
as well
as an operating agreement governing another entity, Gas RNG Systems LLC (“
RNG US
”). The Defendants, by way of their
counterclaim, seek damages in the amount of $4.9 million. PyroGenesis has maintained that AST was never a shareholder
of either RNG Canada or RNG US nor was it a party to
the disputed shareholders and operating agreements.
On October
6, 2021,
AST filed
an action
for damages
and unpaid
invoices against
RNG Canada,
RNG
US, Mr.
Shivaji Ramalingam, Mr. Peter Glauber, Mr. Paul-Louis Crouzat and Mr. Tarlok Nandhra before the Quebec Superior Court.
On February 13, 2022, a defence and
counterclaim was filed against AST and two former shareholders of
AST (Mr. Magnin
and Mr. Paul
D. Singh), seeking approximately
$712,000 in alleged compensatory
damages. The counterclaim also
seeks
a condemnation for legal fees, moral damages and punitive
damages for approximately $771,333.
On February 17,
2023, the
Company received
a motion from
the securities regulatory
authority in the
Province of
Québec,
filed
with
the
Superior
Court
of
Québec,
pursuant
to
which
the
AMF
is
asking
the
Court
to
determine
whether
certain documents previously requested
by the AMF from the
Company are subject to
solicitor-client privilege. The
motion
was filed by the
AMF in connection
with an investigation
being conducted in
the context of
applicable securities laws.
The
Company understands
the AMF
is investigating
certain actions
taken by
the President
and Chief
Executive Officer
of the
Company,
Mr.
P.
Peter
Pascali, in
connection
with
a
settlement
agreement
entered
into on
April
30, 2018,
between the
Company and Phoenix Haute Technology
Inc. (“
Phoenix
”), a company controlled by the father of Mr. P.
Peter Pascali, and
ancillary transactions.
Pursuant
to the
terms
of a
board-approved
settlement
agreement,
and
as further
disclosed
in the
annual information form of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2020, available under the Company’s
profile on
SEDAR at www.sedar.com, under “Interest of Management and Others in Material Transactions – Settlement of Claim”,
the
Company issued $3.7 million of units
comprised of common shares and warrants to Phoenix in
2018, to settle a $5.5 million
claim
of
Phoenix
with
respect
to
the
unpaid
portion
of
the
consideration
payable
by
the
Company
to
Phoenix
for
an
acquisition of
intellectual
property
rights completed
in
2011.
To
the
Company’s
knowledge, the
investigation
of the
AMF
does not
involve any
allegations of
wrongdoing by
the Company.
The AMF
has neither
announced any
proceedings
nor
filed
any
charges.
The
Company
believes
that
no
corporate
or
securities
laws
have
been
breached
but
cannot
predict
whether any enforcement action will result from the investigation.
14.
Interest of Management and Others in Material Transactions
Other than
as described
elsewhere in
this AIF
and as
described below, there is
no material interest,
direct or indirect,
of: (i)
any director
or executive
officer
of the
Company;
(ii) any
person or
company
that beneficially
owns, or
controls or
directs,
directly
or indirectly,
more than
10% of
the
Company’s
outstanding
voting
securities;
or (iii)
an associate
or any
affiliate of any persons or companies referred to above in (i) or (ii), in any transaction within the three years before the date
of
this
AIF
that
has
materially
affected
or
is
reasonably
expected
to
materially
affect
the
Company.
See
“Directors
and
Executive Officers - Conflicts of Interest”.