For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill was allocated to the group of CGUs constituting the sole operating segment of the Group (note 5.1). The recoverable amount of the group of CGUs is based on the cumulated value in use estimated for each CGU or group of CGUs. The Group’s material CGUs relate to on-market drugs and drug candidates referred to above. The impairment test was performed by determining the recoverable amount of each CGU as the risk-adjusted net present value of future cashflows as of June 30, 2022.
Key assumptions used in value in use calculations
The estimation of recoverable amounts involves significant management judgment. The values assigned to each assumption are based on historical data from external and internal sources and on management’s estimates. The key assumptions used in the valuation models were determined as follows:
| • | | Cash-flow projections were based on a financial forecast developed by management that includes net sales, cost of sales, and development cost projections, which are periodically updated and reviewed by management. |
| • | | Revenue forecasts considered the relevant market sizes, disease prevalence, expected market share, expected patent life, and expected year of obtention of market approval where applicable. |
| • | | Forecast periods were defined on a product basis and based on the product life cycle. For in-process projects, cash flows were projected for each CGU over a period of up to 12 years, reflecting the length of the development and subsequent commercialization period. For on-market products, cash flows were projected over a period of five years. Cash flows beyond the forecast period were extrapolated using an attrition rate of 5% until the expected end of the exclusivity period of each product. No terminal value was considered. |
| • | | Probabilities of success for in-process projects to reach final development and commercialization ranged from 15% to 80%. Probabilities were based on empirical success rate analysis of multi-stage studies for comparable indications. |
| • | | Pre-tax discount rate was 16.54% based on the assumed cost of capital for the Group (December 31, 2021: 17%). |
Impairment test conclusion
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2022, the Group recognized a total of TCHF 8’226 of impairment charge to partially write down the carrying value of intangible assets associated with PKU Golike, Sentinox and certain other products. The impairment charge was recorded in the comprehensive statement of loss under the heading ‘Impairment expense’.
As Relief advances towards direct commercialization of PKU Golike in the U.S. and expands its sales operations in Europe and in the rest of the world, assumptions underlying expected future cash flows were updated in the third quarter of 2022. Changes in pricing scenario, costs of launch in new addressable markets, and general and administrative costs allocated to PKU Golike, resulted in a reduction of estimated future net cash flows from the asset. Based on the analysis, an impairment charge of TCHF 5’856 was recognized in the current period against the intangible asset associated with PKU Golike with a carrying amount of TCHF 23’479 as of June 30, 2022. In addition, goodwill allocated to PKU Golike was entirely impaired.
The Group also revised its development plan for Sentinox program resulting in a one-year delay in the estimated launch date. This resulted in an impairment charge of TCHF 388 in the current period against the IPR&D asset associated with Sentinox with a carrying amount of TCHF 3’099 as of June 30, 2022. In addition, goodwill allocated to Sentinox was entirely impaired.
For other intangible assets and remaining goodwill, the Group determined based on the results of the impairment test that their estimated value in use exceeded their respective carrying amounts as of the measurement date. Therefore, the Company did not record an impairment charge on these other assets for the six-month period ended June 30, 2022.
Sensitivity to changes in assumptions
The Group performed a sensitivity analysis taking into account reasonably possible changes in the assumptions the value in use is most sensitive to. Main assumptions tested for changes were a higher discount rate and lower gross margins, as well as, with regards to in-process projects, postponed market launch date and lower probability of success.
If all other assumptions were held constant, an increase of the pre-tax discount rate by 143 basis points, a reduction of expected gross margin during commercialization phase by 10 percent, a reduction of the probability of success by 500 basis point, or a market launch date postponed by one year would result in an impairment of the IPR&D asset related to APR-TD011. Under the base case scenario, the estimated recoverable amount exceeded the carrying amount of the asset by TCHF 6’613.
If all other assumptions were held constant, a reduction of the expected gross margin by 10 percent would result in an impairment of the intangible asset related to Diclofenac. No reasonably possible change of discount rate would result in an impairment. Under the base case scenario, the estimated recoverable amount exceeded the carrying amount of the asset by TCHF 669.
- 10 -