000108981900000186722020FYfalse0Includes cash and cash equivalents of $116,292, current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $11,100, and non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $15,203.Includes cash and cash equivalents of $84,976, current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $4,545, and non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $744.(1) Includes cash and cash equivalents of $55,489, current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $11,100, and non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $14,363.(2) Includes cash and cash equivalents of $24,846, current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $4,545, and non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $0.us-gaap:OtherLiabilitiesCurrentus-gaap:OtherLiabilitiesCurrentP5Yus-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMemberus-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMemberP5YP7YP2Y
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________
FORM 10-K
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020
Or
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
__________________
Commission file number 1-15759
CLECO CORPORATE HOLDINGS LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | | | | | | | | |
Louisiana | | 72-1445282 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2030 Donahue Ferry Road, Pineville, Louisiana 71360-5226
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (318) 484-7400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
__________________
Commission file number 1-05663
CLECO POWER LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | | | | | | | | |
Louisiana | | 72-0244480 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2030 Donahue Ferry Road, Pineville, Louisiana 71360-5226
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (318) 484-7400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Cleco Power LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC, meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format.
Indicate by check mark if Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if Cleco Power LLC is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if Cleco Power LLC is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether Cleco Power LLC: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants have submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrants were required to submit such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revise accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.☐
Indicate by check mark whether Cleco Power LLC is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revise accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ☐ No x
Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC has 0 common stock outstanding. All of the outstanding equity of Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC is held by Cleco Group LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Partners L.P.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
This Combined Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report on Form 10-K”) is separately filed by Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC and Cleco Power LLC. Information in this filing relating to Cleco Power LLC is filed by Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC and separately by Cleco Power LLC on its own behalf. Cleco Power LLC makes no representation as to information relating to Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC (except as it may relate to Cleco Power LLC) or any other affiliate or subsidiary of Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K should be read in its entirety as it pertains to each respective Registrant. The Notes to the Financial Statements for the Registrants and certain other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are combined.
| | | | | | | | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS | |
| | PAGE |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
ITEM 6. | Selected Financial Data | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
References in Part III, Item 11 in this filing to “we,” “our,” and “the Company” mean Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Additional abbreviations or acronyms used in this filing, including all items in Parts I, II, III, and IV are defined below:
| | | | | |
ABBREVIATION OR ACRONYM | DEFINITION |
2016 Merger | Merger of Merger Sub with and into Cleco Corporation pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement which was completed on April 13, 2016 |
2016 Merger Commitments | Cleco Partners’, Cleco Group’s, Cleco Holdings’, and Cleco Power’s 77 commitments to the LPSC as defined in Docket No. U-33434 |
401(k) Plan | Cleco Power 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan |
ABR | Alternate Base Rate which is the greater of the prime rate, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, or LIBOR plus 1.0% |
Acadia | Acadia Power Partners, LLC, previously a wholly owned subsidiary of Midstream. Acadia Power Partners, LLC was dissolved effective August 29, 2014. |
Acadia Unit 1 | Cleco Power’s 580-MW, combined cycle power plant located at the Acadia Power Station in Eunice, Louisiana |
Acadia Unit 2 | Entergy Louisiana’s 580-MW, combined cycle power plant located at the Acadia Power Station in Eunice, Louisiana, which is operated by Cleco Power |
ACE | Affordable Clean Energy |
ADIT | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax |
AFUDC | Allowance for Funds Used During Construction |
| |
Amended Lignite Mining Agreement | Amended and restated lignite mining agreement effective December 29, 2009 |
AMI | Advanced Metering Infrastructure |
AOCI | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
ARO | Asset Retirement Obligation |
| |
Attala | Attala Transmission LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Holdings |
BCI | British Columbia Investment Management Corporation |
Brame Energy Center | A facility consisting of Nesbitt Unit 1, Rodemacher Unit 2, and Madison Unit 3 |
CAA | Clean Air Act |
CARES Act | Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of March 2020 |
CCR | Coal combustion by-products or residual |
| |
CECL | Current Expected Credit Losses |
CEO | Chief Executive Officer |
CFO | Chief Financial Officer |
CIP | Critical Infrastructure Protection |
Cleco | Cleco Holdings and its subsidiaries |
Cleco Cajun | Cleco Cajun LLC (formerly Cleco Energy LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Holdings) and its subsidiaries |
Cleco Cajun Transaction | The transaction between Cleco Cajun and NRG Energy in which Cleco Cajun acquired all the membership interest in South Central Generating, which closed on February 4, 2019, pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, which includes the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback |
Cleco Corporation | Pre-2016 Merger entity that was converted to a limited liability company and changed its name to Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC on April 13, 2016 |
| |
Cleco Group | Cleco Group LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Partners |
Cleco Holdings | Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Group |
Cleco Katrina/Rita | Cleco Katrina/Rita Hurricane Recovery Funding LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Power |
Cleco Partners | Cleco Partners L.P., a Delaware limited partnership that is owned by a consortium of investors, including funds or investment vehicles managed by MIRA, BCI, John Hancock Financial, and other infrastructure investors |
Cleco Power | Cleco Power LLC and its subsidiaries, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Holdings |
CO2 | Carbon dioxide |
Como 1 | Como 1, L.P., currently known as Cleco Partners |
Consent Decree | The Consent Decree, entered March 5, 2013, in Civil Action No. 09-100-JJB-DLD, United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana, by and among the EPA, the LDEQ, and Louisiana Generating relating to Big Cajun II, Unit 1 located in New Roads, Louisiana |
Cottonwood Energy | Cottonwood Energy Company LP, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Cajun. Prior to the closing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction on February 4, 2019, Cottonwood Energy was an indirect subsidiary of South Central Generating. |
Cottonwood Plant | Cleco Cajun’s 1,263-MW, natural-gas-fired generating station located in Deweyville, Texas |
Cottonwood Sale Leaseback | A lease agreement executed and delivered between Cottonwood Energy and a special-purpose entity that is a subsidiary of NRG Energy pursuant to which NRG Energy will lease back the Cottonwood Plant and will operate it until no later than May 2025. |
Coughlin | Cleco Power’s 775-MW, combined-cycle power plant located in St. Landry, Louisiana |
COVID-19 | Novel coronavirus disease 2019 and the related global outbreak that was subsequently declared a pandemic by WHO in March 2020 |
CPP | Clean Power Plan |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
ABBREVIATION OR ACRONYM | DEFINITION |
CSAPR | Cross-State Air Pollution Rule |
D&I | Diversity and Inclusion |
DHLC | Dolet Hills Lignite Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of SWEPCO |
Diversified Lands | Diversified Lands LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Holdings |
| |
| |
Dolet Hills | A facility consisting of Dolet Hills Power Station, the Dolet Hills mine, and the Oxbow mine |
Dolet Hills Power Station | A 650-MW generating unit at Cleco Power’s plant site in Mansfield, Louisiana. Cleco Power has a 50% ownership interest in the capacity of the Dolet Hills Power Station. |
EAC | Environmental Adjustment Clause |
EAF | Equivalent Availability Factor |
EBITDA | Earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization |
EGU | Electric Generating Unit |
EFORd | Equivalent Forced Outage Rate on demand |
EMT | Executive Management Team |
Entergy Gulf States | Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, LLC |
Entergy Louisiana | Entergy Louisiana, LLC |
EPA | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
ERO | Electric Reliability Organization |
| |
Evangeline | Cleco Evangeline LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Midstream |
FAC | Fuel Adjustment Clause |
FASB | Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
Fitch | Fitch Ratings, a credit rating agency |
FTR | Financial Transmission Right |
FRP | Formula Rate Plan |
GAAP | Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the U.S. |
GHG | Greenhouse gas |
GO Zone | Gulf Opportunity Zone Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-135) |
IRC | Internal Revenue Code |
| |
IRS | Internal Revenue Service |
ISO | Independent System Operator |
kWh | Kilowatt-hour(s) |
LCFC | Lost Contribution to Fixed Cost |
LDEQ | Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality |
| |
LIBOR | London Interbank Offered Rate |
LMP | Locational Marginal Price |
Louisiana Generating | Louisiana Generating, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of South Central Generating |
LPSC | Louisiana Public Service Commission |
LTIP | Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan |
LTSA | Long-Term Parts and Service Agreement between Cottonwood Energy and a third party, dated January 19, 2001, that Cleco Cajun assumed as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction to provide maintenance services related to the Cottonwood Plant |
Madison Unit 3 | A 641-MW generating unit at Cleco Power’s plant site in Boyce, Louisiana |
MATS | Mercury and Air Toxics Standards |
Merger Agreement | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 17, 2014, by and among Cleco Partners, Merger Sub, and Cleco Corporation relating to the 2016 Merger |
Merger Sub | Cleco MergerSub Inc., previously an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Partners that was merged with and into Cleco Corporation, with Cleco Corporation surviving the 2016 Merger, and Cleco Corporation converting to a limited liability company and changing its name to Cleco Holdings |
Midstream | Cleco Midstream Resources LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Holdings |
| |
MIRA | Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets Inc. |
MISO | Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. |
MMBtu | One million British thermal units |
Moody’s | Moody’s Investors Service, a credit rating agency |
MW | Megawatt(s) |
MWh | Megawatt-hour(s) |
N/A | Not Applicable |
NAAQS | National Ambient Air Quality Standards |
NERC | North American Electric Reliability Corporation |
NMTC | New Markets Tax Credit |
| |
| |
Not Meaningful | A percentage comparison of these items is not statistically meaningful because the percentage difference is greater than 1,000% |
NO2 | Nitrogen dioxide |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
ABBREVIATION OR ACRONYM | DEFINITION |
NOx | Nitrogen oxide |
NRG Energy | NRG Energy, Inc. |
NRG South Central | NRG South Central Generating LLC |
| |
| |
| |
| |
NSPS | New Source Performance Standards |
Other Benefits | Includes medical, dental, vision, and life insurance for Cleco’s retirees |
Oxbow | Oxbow Lignite Company, LLC, 50% owned by Cleco Power and 50% owned by SWEPCO |
PCB | Polychlorinated biphenyl |
Perryville | Perryville Energy Partners, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Holdings |
ppb | Parts per billion |
| |
Predecessor | Pre-merger activity of Cleco. Cleco has accounted for the 2016 Merger transaction by applying the acquisition method of accounting. The predecessor period is not comparable to the successor period. |
Purchase and Sale Agreement | Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of February 6, 2018, by and among NRG Energy, South Central Generating, and Cleco Cajun |
| |
Registrant(s) | Cleco Holdings and/or Cleco Power |
| |
Rodemacher Unit 2 | A 523-MW generating unit at Cleco Power’s plant site in Boyce, Louisiana. Cleco Power has a 30% ownership interest in the capacity of Rodemacher Unit 2. |
ROE | Return on Equity |
ROIC | Return on Invested Capital |
ROU | Right of Use |
RTO | Regional Transmission Organization |
S&P | S&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc, a credit rating agency |
SAIDI | System Average Interruption Duration Index |
SEC | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
| |
SERP | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
SO2 | Sulfur dioxide |
South Central Generating | South Central Generating LLC, formerly NRG South Central Generating LLC |
| |
| |
SSR | System Support Resource |
START | Strategic Alignment and Real-Time Transformation |
STIP | Short-Term Incentive Plan |
Successor | Post-merger activity of Cleco. Cleco has accounted for the 2016 Merger transaction by applying the acquisition method of accounting. The successor period is not comparable to the predecessor period. |
Support Group | Cleco Support Group LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Holdings |
SWEPCO | Southwestern Electric Power Company, an electric utility subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc. |
TCJA | Federal tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 |
Teche Unit 3 | A 359-MW generating unit at Cleco Power’s plant site in Baldwin, Louisiana |
WHO | World Health Organization |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, future capital expenditures; business strategies; goals, beliefs, plans, and objectives; competitive strengths; market developments; development and operation of facilities; growth in sales volume; meeting capacity requirements; expansion of service to existing customers and service to new customers; future environmental regulations and remediation liabilities; electric customer credits; and the anticipated outcome of various regulatory and legal proceedings. Although the Registrants believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions (some of which may prove to be incorrect) and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from the Registrants’ expectations. In addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with these forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following list identifies some of the factors that could cause the Registrants’ actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any of the Registrants’ forward-looking statements:
•changes in environmental laws, regulations, decisions and policies, including present and potential environmental remediation costs, restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate concerns over global climate changes, possible effects on Cleco’s generation resources, or prohibitions or restriction on new or existing services, and Cleco’s compliance with these matters,
•state and federal regulatory decisions or related judicial decisions disallowing or delaying recovery of capital investments, operating costs, commodity costs, the ordering of refunds to customers and discretion over allowed return on investment,
•the loss of regulatory accounting treatment, which could result in the write-off of regulatory assets and the loss of regulatory deferral and recovery mechanisms,
•pandemics, including the current COVID-19 pandemic,
•changes in climate and weather conditions, including natural disasters such as wind and ice storms, hurricanes, floods, and droughts,
•mechanical breakdowns or other incidents that could impair assets and disrupt operations of any of Cleco’s generation facilities, transmission and distribution systems, or other operations and may require Cleco to purchase replacement power or incur costs to repair the facilities,
•growth or decline of Cleco’s customer base, or decline in existing services, including, the effect of the trend toward distributed generation at customer sites,the loss of key suppliers for fuel, materials, or services or other disruptions to the supply chain,
•wholesale and retail competition, including alternative energy sources, growth in customer-owned power resource technologies that displace utility-supplied energy or that may
be sold back to the utility, and alternative energy suppliers and delivery arrangements,
•blackouts or disruptions of interconnected transmission systems (the regional power grid),
•terrorist attacks, cyberattacks, or other malicious acts, including any effects of terrorism, cyberattacks, ransomware, or vandalism that may damage or disrupt information technology systems,
•changes in technology costs that impede Cleco’s ability to effectively implement new information systems or to operate and maintain current production technology,
•changes in Cleco’s strategic business plans, which could be affected by any of the factors discussed herein,
•economic conditions in Cleco’s service areas, including the economy’s effects on customer demand for utility services,
•the impact of Cleco’s credit ratings, changes in interest rates, other capital market conditions, and global market conditions on financing through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities,
•declining energy demand related to customer energy efficiency, conservation measures or increased distributed generation,
•industry and geographic concentrations of Cleco’s counterparties, suppliers, and customers,
•deterioration in the creditworthiness of Cleco’s customers,
•volatility and illiquidity in wholesale energy markets,
•default or nonperformance on the part of any parties from whom Cleco purchases and/or sells capacity or energy,
•Cleco Holdings’ and Cleco Power’s ability to remain in compliance with their respective debt covenants,
•the outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies,
•changes in actuarial assumptions, interest rates and the actual return on plan assets for Cleco’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans,
•insufficient insurance coverage, more restrictive coverage terms, increasing insurance cost and Cleco’s ability to obtain insurance,
•Cleco’s ability to remain in compliance with the commitments made to the LPSC in connection with the Cleco Cajun Transaction and the 2016 Merger,
•Cleco Holdings’ dependence on the earnings, dividends, or distributions from its subsidiaries to meet its debt obligations,
•work-force factors, including aging workforce, changes in key members of management, availability of workers in a variety of skill areas, and Cleco’s ability to recruit and retain qualified employees, and
•the unpredictability of civil unrest and its direct and indirect impact on Cleco.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
For more discussion of these factors and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in the Registrants’ forward-looking statements, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2020, and 2019 — Cleco Power — Significant Factors Affecting Cleco Power” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Registrants, or persons acting on their
behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the factors identified above.
Any forward-looking statement is considered only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, except as required by law, the Registrants undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of changes in actual results, changes in assumptions, or other factors affecting such statements.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Cleco Holdings is a public utility holding company that holds investments in several subsidiaries, including Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun. Prior to the Cleco Cajun Transaction, substantially all of Cleco Holdings’ operations were conducted through Cleco Power. Cleco Holdings, subject to certain limited exceptions, is exempt from regulation as a public utility holding company pursuant to provisions of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005. Cleco Holdings’ predecessor was incorporated on October 30, 1998, under the laws of the state of Louisiana. On April 13, 2016, Cleco Holdings completed its merger with Merger Sub whereby Merger Sub merged with and into Cleco Corporation, with Cleco Corporation surviving the 2016 Merger, and Cleco Corporation converting to a limited liability company and changing its name to Cleco Holdings, as a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Group and an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Cleco Partners.
Cleco Power is a regulated electric utility engaged principally in the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electricity within Louisiana. Cleco Power owns 10 generating units with a total rated capacity of 3,360 MW and serves approximately 290,000 customers in Louisiana through its retail business. Additionally, Cleco Power supplies wholesale power in Louisiana and Mississippi. Cleco Power was organized as a limited liability company under the laws of the state of Louisiana on December 12, 2000. Cleco Power’s predecessor was incorporated on January 2, 1935, under the laws of the state of Louisiana.
Cleco Cajun, organized on December 28, 2017, under the laws of the state of Louisiana, is an unregulated electric utility that owns 14 generating units with a total rated capacity of 3,379 MW and wholesale contracts serving nine Louisiana cooperatives, three wholesale municipal customers, and one electric utility. On February 4, 2019, the Cleco Cajun Transaction was completed. For more information on the Cleco Cajun Transaction, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 3 — Business Combinations.”
Cleco and Cleco Power’s mailing address is P.O. Box 5000, Pineville, Louisiana 71361-5000, and its telephone number is (318) 484-7400. Cleco’s website is located at https://www.cleco.com. Cleco and Cleco Power’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and other filings with the SEC are available, free of charge, through Cleco’s website after those reports or filings are filed electronically with or furnished to the SEC. Cleco’s electronically filed reports can also be obtained on the SEC’s website located at https://www.sec.gov. Cleco’s Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct for Financial Managers, Ethics Guide, Conflicts of Interest and Related Policies, and the charters of its Boards of Managers’ Audit, Leadership Development and Compensation, Business Planning and Budget Review, Governance and Public Affairs, and Asset Management committees are available on its website and available in print upon request. Information on Cleco’s website or any other website is not incorporated by reference into this
Annual Report on Form 10-K and does not constitute a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Cleco Power meets the conditions specified in General Instructions I(1)(a) and (b) to Form 10-K and, therefore, is permitted to use the reduced disclosure format for wholly owned subsidiaries of reporting companies. Accordingly, Cleco Power has omitted from this Annual Report on Form
10-K the information called for by the following Part II item of Form 10-K: Item 7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations); and the following Part III items of Form 10-K: Item 10 (Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance of the Registrants), Item 11 (Executive Compensation), Item 12 (Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters), and Item 13 (Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence).
Cleco’s key human capital management objectives are to attract, retain, and develop top talent. To support these objectives, Cleco strives to provide a diverse, inclusive, and safe workplace. Cleco’s programs are designed to acquire talent and facilitate internal talent development to create a high-performing, diverse workforce; reward and support employees through competitive pay and benefits, as well as safety and wellness programs; enhance culture through efforts aimed at making the workplace more engaging and inclusive; facilitate programs that build connections between employees and communities; and evolve and invest in technology, tools, and resources to enable employees at work.
As of December 31, 2020, Cleco employed 1,465 employees, of whom 1,192 were professional, technical and craft employees,152 were field management, and 121 were corporate management. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power employed 860 employees, of whom 730 were professional, technical and craft employees, 115 were field management, and 15 were corporate management. All of these employees were full-time. Approximately 9% of Cleco’s employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Cleco has not experienced strikes or work stoppages and believes it has good relations with its employees.
D&I
Cleco believes that diverse teams working in an inclusive environment are the primary drivers of better employee engagement, increased innovation, and higher customer satisfaction. With greater workplace diversity and inclusion, Cleco seeks to create the conditions for high performing teams to do their best work. Cleco’s recent efforts have been focused in three areas: building awareness and skills of the D&I Council; making observable changes in leadership diversity and inclusion behaviors; and strengthening diversity and inclusion communication and messaging. The following are some of Cleco’s D&I achievements related to such focus areas:
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
•empowered the Cleco D&I Council as a group of leaders to leverage diversity and inclusion to help make Cleco’s business stronger,
•signed the pledge for CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion™ to communicate a commitment to diversity and inclusion actions,
•launched implicit bias awareness training to increase awareness of implicit bias and enhance the ability to manage diverse work teams in an inclusive work environment,
•increased diversity and inclusion communications internally and externally. Internally, a live, virtual panel of Cleco executives spoke about the importance and impact of diversity and inclusion and answered employee questions. Externally, Cleco’s website was updated to include an emphasis on Cleco’s diversity and inclusion efforts,
•established an Employee Resource Group framework to engage employees and allies in providing their perspective on thoughts and issues related to female and underrepresented groups, and
•launched the Cleco Power of a Promise Scholarship to educate and employ under-represented minorities and females in the central Louisiana area as well as sponsor the Diversity Scholars Program.
Cleco continues to recruit from historically black colleges and universities in Louisiana, including Grambling State University and Southern University.
In an effort to provide transparency into its efforts to increase underrepresented populations in Cleco’s workforce, Cleco intends to disclose its 2020 Consolidated EEO-1 Report after submission of the report to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Cleco expects to submit the 2020 Consolidated EEO-1 Report in the second quarter of 2021.
Health, Safety, and Wellness
The success of Cleco’s business is fundamentally connected to the well-being of its employees. Accordingly, Cleco is committed to the health, safety, and wellness of its employees.
Cleco has a robust safety culture and programs to ensure its employees are safe at work and away from work. Over the past several years, Cleco has been striving to improve the safety culture in an effort to be a “world class” safety organization with top decile performance compared to peer companies with the goal of reaching target zero for injuries and accidents. To accomplish this goal, Cleco implemented several safety initiatives throughout the organization aimed at not only lagging indicators but also leading indicators in an effort to reduce the number and severity of safety incidents. Cleco utilizes employee-led safety teams throughout the company to drive the safety initiatives and provide feedback to senior management. All employees receive safety training including human performance designed to improve total organization performance.
Cleco provides its employees and their families with access to a variety of health and wellness programs, including programs that provide protection and security so they can have peace of mind concerning events that may require time away from work. Cleco also has programs that support employees’ physical and mental health by providing tools and resources to help them improve or maintain their health and encourage engagement in healthy behaviors. These include paid time off, family leave, flexible work schedules, employee
assistance programs, tuition assistance, and on-site services, such as fitness centers, among many others.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Cleco implemented significant changes that it determined to be in the best interest of its employees, as well as the communities in which it operates, and which comply with government regulations. This includes having employees work from home, while implementing additional safety measures for employees continuing essential on-site work. For more information about Cleco’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Overview — COVID-19.”
Compensation and Benefits
Cleco is committed to offering market-competitive compensation and benefits. Its incentive plan reinforces and rewards individuals for achievement of specific company goals. This may include involvement of outside compensation advisors or use of benchmarking data. Cleco’s benefit offerings are designed to meet the varied and evolving needs of a diverse workforce and offer choice where possible so employees can customize their benefits to meet their needs and the needs of their families. These offerings include a 401(k) Plan, healthcare benefits, health savings and flexible spending accounts, and a variety of insurance options.
Talent Acquisition and Talent Development
Cleco prioritizes investing in the attraction and development of the talent needed to build a sustainable workforce. Cleco has revamped its recruiting and hiring practices, technologies, and resources and has also expanded its focus on continuous learning and development. Cleco has implemented “industry-leading” methodologies to assess performance and potential, provide coaching and feedback, and develop talent. Cleco provides a series of targeted management workshops to address leadership skill and competency gaps. Additionally, its performance management program provides an ongoing opportunity for employees and managers to engage in continuous dialogue and coaching aligned with its annual review process. Cleco also has a multitude of other resources, such as online learning platforms, that provide quick access to learning resources, tuition reimbursement, and executive talent and succession planning paired with a differentiated development approach. Cleco also encourages employees to engage in external workshops and organizations to address individualized development needs and stay abreast of industry and position-specific best practices.
Employee Engagement
Employee sentiment is important to Cleco. The company measures this throughout the year via an employee engagement survey. One of the key metrics used is the Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS), an indicator of employees’ likelihood to recommend Cleco as a place of employment to friends and/or family. Cleco is proud to consistently receive a strong eNPS score year over year. Other important areas measured on the employee engagement survey include future outlook, leadership, safety, D&I, communications, vibrancy, and goals.
Cleco’s employee application, Pulse, is a mobile, two-way communication platform that allows for tracking of viewership, enables targeted messaging by employee segments, and offers key performance indicators to measure how our internal
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
communication supports Cleco’s business objectives. In support of our employee engagement efforts, Pulse is the cornerstone of communication for all employees in which 90% of Cleco employees are registered. Pulse has allowed Cleco to successfully reach employees during the COVID-19 pandemic, hurricanes, and winter storms. Pulse also enables forums such as D&I and safety.
Communities
Cleco believes that building connections between its employees and its communities creates a more meaningful, fulfilling, and enjoyable workplace. Cleco is committed to being a responsible company in the communities where it does business. Through Cleco’s technology platforms for employee giving, company matching, and volunteering program, employees are able to find and register for volunteer opportunities within their communities and use automated payroll deductions to donate to causes they are passionate about. For 2021, Cleco will match employee donations made to Louisiana qualifying causes dollar for dollar up to $1,000 per employee. Organizations are also able to enroll in the platform in order to receive donations faster and connect with corporate giving and volunteering opportunities at Cleco. Cleco also frequently collaborates with organizations on volunteer activities for its employees. Throughout the year, employees make a positive impact in their local communities and have found a multitude of special ways to continue volunteering during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Oversight and Governance
Cleco’s Leadership Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Managers, through its charter, provides oversight of Cleco’s policies, programs, and initiatives focusing on workforce diversity and inclusion. Cleco’s Governance and Public Affairs Committee, through its charter, provides oversight of Cleco’s charitable donations, outreach, and economic development funding programs.
Cleco Power
Certain Factors Affecting Cleco Power
As an electric utility, Cleco Power is affected by a number of factors influencing the electric utility industry in general. For more information on these factors, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2020, and 2019 — Cleco Power — Significant Factors Affecting Cleco Power.”
Power Generation
As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power’s aggregate net electric generating capacity was 3,186 MW. This amount reflects the maximum production capacity these units can sustain over a specified period of time. On March 1, 2019, Cleco Power began to operate the Dolet Hills Power Station on a seasonal dispatch from June through September; however, the Dolet Hills Power Station will continue to be available to operate in other months, if needed. In June 2020, after thorough evaluation, management decided to retire the Dolet Hills Power Station. For more information regarding the Dolet Hills Power Station anticipated closure, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 6 — Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — Dolet Hills Closure Costs.” Cleco Power anticipates filing an application with the LPSC in March 2021 giving notice that the Dolet Hills Power Station will be retired at the end of 2021 and requesting approval of the regulatory treatment and recovery of the stranded costs and decommissioning costs over 20 years.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to Cleco Power’s generating facilities as of December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GENERATING STATION | YEAR OF INITIAL OPERATION | RATED CAPACITY (MW) | | NET CAPACITY (MW) | (1) | PRIMARY FUEL USED FOR GENERATION | GENERATION TYPE |
Brame Energy Center | | | | | | | |
Nesbitt Unit 1 | 1975 | | 440 | | | 413 | | | natural gas | steam |
Rodemacher Unit 2 | 1982 | | 157 | | (2) | 149 | | (2) | coal | steam |
Madison Unit 3 | 2010 | | 641 | | | 623 | | | petroleum coke/coal | steam |
Acadia Unit 1 | 2002 | | 580 | | | 549 | | | natural gas | combined cycle |
Coughlin Unit 6 | 2000 | | 264 | | | 248 | | | natural gas | combined cycle |
Coughlin Unit 7 | 2000 | | 511 | | | 474 | | | natural gas | combined cycle |
Teche Unit 3 | 1971 | | 359 | | | 331 | | | natural gas | steam |
Teche Unit 4 | 2011 | | 33 | | | 34 | | | natural gas | combustion |
Dolet Hills Power Station | 1986 | | 325 | | (3) | 318 | | (3) | lignite | steam |
St. Mary Clean Energy Center | 2019 | | 50 | | | 47 | | | waste heat | steam |
Total generating capability | | 3,360 | | | 3,186 | | | | |
(1) Based on capacity testing of the generating units and operational tests performed between February and August 2020. These amounts do not represent generating unit capacity for MISO planning reserve margins.
(2) Represents Cleco Power’s 30% ownership interest in the capacity of Rodemacher Unit 2, a 523-MW generating unit.
(3) Represents Cleco Power’s 50% ownership interest in the capacity of Dolet Hills, a 650-MW generating unit.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
The following table sets forth the amounts of power generated by Cleco Power for the years indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
YEAR | THOUSAND MWh | | PERCENT OF TOTAL ENERGY REQUIREMENTS |
2020 | 11,801 | | | 101.5 | % |
2019 | 12,552 | | | 103.0 | % |
2018 | 11,848 | | | 94.6 | % |
2017 | 10,864 | | | 91.1 | % |
2016 | 12,759 | | | 103.6 | % |
Cleco Power’s generation dispatch and transmission operations are integrated with MISO. The amount of power generated by Cleco Power is dictated by the availability of Cleco Power’s generating fleet and the manner in which MISO dispatches each generating unit. Depending on how generating units are dispatched by MISO, the amount of power generated may be greater than or less than total energy requirements. Generating units are dispatched by referencing each unit’s economic efficiency as it relates to the overall MISO market. For more information on MISO, see Part II, Item 7,
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Regulatory and Other Matters — Transmission Rates.”
Fuel and Purchased Power
Changes in fuel expenses reflect fluctuations in the amount, type, and pricing of fuel used for electric generation; fuel transportation and delivery costs; and deferral of expenses for recovery from customers through Cleco Power’s FAC in subsequent months. Changes in purchased power expenses are a result of the quantity and price of economic power purchased from the MISO market. These quantity changes can be affected by Cleco plant outages and plant performance. For a discussion of certain risks associated with changes in fuel costs and their impact on utility customers, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — Transmission Constraints” and “— Regulatory Risks — LPSC Audits.”
The following table sets forth the percentages of power generated from various fuels at Cleco Power’s electric generating plants, the cost of fuel used per MWh attributable to each such fuel, and the weighted average fuel cost per MWh:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | LIGNITE | | | | COAL | | NATURAL GAS | | PETROLEUM COKE | | | RENEWABLES | | WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST PER MWh |
YEAR | COST PER MWh | | PERCENT OF GENERATION | | COST PER MWh | | PERCENT OF GENERATION | | COST PER MWh | | PERCENT OF GENERATION | | COST PER MWh | | PERCENT OF GENERATION | | | PERCENT OF GENERATION | |
2020 | $ | 159.10 | | | 2.9 | % | | $ | 25.49 | | | 9.1 | % | | $ | 16.97 | | | 66.2 | % | | $ | 17.40 | | | 20.3 | % | | | 1.5 | % | | $ | 21.90 | |
2019 | $ | 119.88 | | | 4.7 | % | | $ | 24.60 | | | 11.3 | % | | $ | 21.18 | | | 69.1 | % | | $ | 26.54 | | | 14.2 | % | | | 0.7 | % | | $ | 26.85 | |
2018 | $ | 93.88 | | | 6.9 | % | | $ | 22.55 | | | 16.7 | % | | $ | 26.81 | | | 52.6 | % | | $ | 26.54 | | | 23.8 | % | | | — | | | $ | 30.66 | |
2017 | $ | 44.70 | | | 8.9 | % | | $ | 24.75 | | | 12.4 | % | | $ | 27.19 | | | 51.3 | % | | $ | 22.50 | | | 27.4 | % | | | — | | | $ | 27.16 | |
2016 | $ | 50.39 | | | 13.0 | % | | $ | 28.13 | | | 9.3 | % | | $ | 20.84 | | | 52.9 | % | | $ | 18.77 | | | 24.8 | % | | | — | | | $ | 24.86 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Power Purchases
Cleco Power is a participant in the MISO market. MISO makes economic and routine dispatch decisions regarding Cleco Power’s generating units. Power purchases are made at prevailing market prices, also referred to as LMP, which are highly correlated to natural gas prices. LMP includes a component directly related to congestion on the transmission system. Pricing zones with greater transmission congestion may have higher LMPs. Physical transmission constraints present in the MISO market could increase energy costs within Cleco Power’s pricing zones. For information on Cleco Power’s ability to pass on to its customers substantially all of its fuel and purchased power expenses, see “— Regulatory Matters, Industry Developments, and Franchises — Rates.” For information on MISO, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Regulatory and Other Matters — Transmission Rates.”
Coal, Petroleum Coke, and Lignite Supply
Cleco Power uses coal for generation at Rodemacher Unit 2. During 2020, Cleco Power contracted with Arch Coal, LLC to provide Cleco Power’s coal needs at Rodemacher Unit 2, utilizing short-term coal agreements. The coal supply agreements were fixed-price contracts. For 2021, Cleco Power intends to meet its coal needs through short-term coal agreements which are expected to be fixed-price contracts. For the transportation of coal, Cleco Power renewed its agreement on January 1, 2020, with Union Pacific Railroad Company to transport coal from Wyoming’s Powder River Basin to Rodemacher Unit 2. The agreement is for three years, expiring December 31, 2022. Cleco Power leases 113 railcars
to transport its coal under one lease which expires on March 31, 2021. Currently, Cleco Power is exploring multiple railcar lease options, including the renewal of its current lease, to continue its coal transportation once this current lease expires.
The continuous supply of coal may be subject to interruption due to adverse weather conditions or other factors that may disrupt transportation to the plant site. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power’s coal inventory at Rodemacher Unit 2 was approximately 142,000 tons (approximately a 59-day supply).
Cleco Power uses a combination of petroleum coke and Illinois Basin coal for generation at Madison Unit 3. Petroleum coke is a by-product of the oil refinery process and is not considered a fuel specifically produced for a market; however, ample petroleum coke supplies are produced from refineries each year throughout the world, particularly in the Gulf Coast region. During 2020, Cleco received its petroleum coke supply from multiple refineries located along the upper and lower Mississippi River. Cleco purchased slightly more than 825,000 tons of petroleum coke during 2020, all of which were either an evergreen extension of a previous agreement or a negotiated agreement for one year ending December 31, 2020. For 2021, Cleco has contracted for 850,000 tons of petroleum coke from multiple refineries located along the upper and lower Mississippi River through one-year agreements ending December 31, 2021. The agreements are priced according to the Advisian Worley Group (formerly Jacobs Consultancy) Pace Petroleum Coke Quarterly Monthly Price Index or the “PACE” Monthly Index.
During 2020, Cleco purchased approximately 394,000 tons of Illinois Basin coal. Cleco Power uses Louisiana waterways, such as the Mississippi River and the Red River, to
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
deliver both petroleum coke and Illinois Basin coal to the Madison Unit 3 plant site. The continuous supply of petroleum coke and Illinois Basin coal may be subject to interruption due to adverse weather conditions or other factors that may disrupt transportation to the plant site. Savage Inland Marine is Cleco Power’s primary transportation coordinator and provider. Cleco Power has a logistics agreement with Savage Inland Marine that is set to expire in March 2028. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power’s petroleum coke inventory at Madison Unit 3 was approximately 173,000 tons and Cleco Power’s Illinois Basin coal inventory at Madison Unit 3 was approximately 221,000 tons. The total fuel inventory was 394,000 tons (approximately a 59-day supply).
Cleco Power uses lignite for generation at the Dolet Hills Power Station. Cleco Power and SWEPCO each own an undivided 50% interest in the other’s leased and owned lignite reserves within the Dolet Hills mine in northwestern Louisiana. Additionally, through Oxbow, which is owned 50% by Cleco Power and 50% by SWEPCO, Cleco Power and SWEPCO control lignite reserves also located in northwestern Louisiana. Cleco Power and SWEPCO have entered into a long-term agreement with DHLC for the mining and delivery of lignite reserves at both mines, which are operated by SWEPCO. The Amended Lignite Mining Agreement requires Cleco Power and SWEPCO to purchase the lignite mined and delivered by DHLC at cost plus a specified management fee.
In April 2020, Cleco Power and SWEPCO mutually agreed to not develop additional mining areas for future lignite extraction and subsequently provided notice to the LPSC of their intent to cease mining by June 2020. By September 30, 2020, all lignite reserves intended to be extracted from the Oxbow mine had been extracted. On October 6, 2020, Cleco Power and SWEPCO made a joint filing with the LPSC seeking authorization to close the Oxbow mine. Cleco Power expects to have sufficient lignite fuel available to continue seasonal operations of the Dolet Hills Power Station through 2021. The cost of lignite per MWh increased during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to the mine continuing to incur fixed costs, despite fewer tons of lignite mined compared to prior years. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power’s lignite inventory at Dolet Hills was approximately 154,000 tons (approximately a 25-day supply).
For more information regarding the various mines and the anticipated closure of the Dolet Hills Power Station, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 6 — Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — Dolet Hills Closure Costs” and Note 15 — “Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Off-Balance Sheet Commitments and Guarantees,” and for more information on Oxbow, see Note 14 — “Variable Interest Entities.”
Natural Gas Supply
During 2020, Cleco Power purchased 63.1 million MMBtu of natural gas for the generation of electricity. The annual and average per-day quantities of gas purchased by Cleco Power from each supplier are shown in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NATURAL GAS SUPPLIER | 2020 PURCHASES (MMBtu) | | AVERAGE AMOUNT PURCHASED PER DAY (MMBtu) | | PERCENT OF TOTAL NATURAL GAS USED |
Tenaska Marketing Ventures | 19,398,593 | | | 53,147 | | | 30.7 | % |
Mansfield Power and Gas | 14,348,574 | | | 39,311 | | | 22.7 | % |
Cima Energy LP | 9,396,459 | | | 25,744 | | | 14.9 | % |
Kaiser Marketing Appalachian LLC | 3,875,000 | | | 10,616 | | | 6.1 | % |
Spire Marketing, Inc. | 3,623,400 | | | 9,927 | | | 5.7 | % |
Shell Energy North America | 2,864,481 | | | 7,848 | | | 4.5 | % |
Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC | 1,860,200 | | | 5,096 | | | 2.9 | % |
BP Energy Company | 1,762,230 | | | 4,828 | | | 2.8 | % |
Sequent Energy Management | 1,555,800 | | | 4,262 | | | 2.5 | % |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Others | 4,420,893 | | | 12,112 | | | 7.2 | % |
| | | | | |
Total | 63,105,630 | | | 172,891 | | | 100.0 | % |
|
Cleco Power owns natural gas pipelines and interconnections at all of its generating facilities that allow it to access various natural gas supply markets and maintain a reliable, economical fuel supply for Cleco Power’s customers.
Natural gas was available without interruption throughout 2020. Cleco Power expects to continue to meet its natural gas requirements with purchases on the spot market through daily, monthly, and seasonal contracts with various natural gas suppliers. However, future supplies to Cleco Power remain vulnerable to disruptions due to weather events and transportation issues. Large industrial users of natural gas, including electric utilities, generally have low priority among gas users in the event pipeline suppliers are forced to curtail deliveries due to inadequate supplies. As a result, prices may increase rapidly in response to temporary supply interruptions. During 2020, in order to partially address potential natural gas fuel curtailments and interruptions, Cleco contracted for natural gas firm transportation with several interstate pipelines for a period of one year ending in late 2021.
Cleco also uses underground salt dome gas storage to help mitigate supply disruptions to Cleco Power’s generating facilities and to operationally balance gas supply to its units. The storage volume is contracted by paying a capacity reservation charge at a fixed rate. There are also variable charges incurred to withdraw and inject gas from storage. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had 1.6 million MMBtu of gas in storage. Currently, Cleco Power anticipates that its diverse supply options and gas storage, combined with its solid-fuel generation resources, are adequate to meet its generation needs during any temporary interruption of natural gas supplies.
Sales
Cleco Power’s 2020 and 2019 system peak demands, which occurred on July 13, 2020, and September 6, 2019, were 2,536 MW and 2,492 MW, respectively. Sales and system peak demand are affected by weather and are typically highest during the summer air-conditioning season; however, peaks may occur during the winter season as well. For information on the effects of future energy sales on Cleco Power’s results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — Future Electricity Sales” and “— Weather Sensitivity.”
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Reserve margin is the net capacity resources (either owned or purchased) less native load demand, divided by native load demand. Members of MISO submit their forecasted native load demand to MISO each year. During 2020, Cleco Power’s reserve margin was 30.5%, which was above MISO’s unforced planning reserve margin benchmark of 8.9%. During 2019, Cleco Power’s reserve margin was 31.7%, which was also above MISO’s unforced planning reserve margin benchmark of 7.9%. Cleco Power expects to meet or exceed MISO’s unforced planning reserve margin benchmark of 9.4% in 2021. For more information on MISO, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Regulatory and Other Matters — Transmission Rates.”
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the LPSC issued an executive order prohibiting the disconnection of utilities for nonpayment from March 13, 2020 through July 16, 2020. As a result of this executive order, Cleco Power suspended the assessment of late fees, disconnections, and the utilization of collection agencies, which resulted in no additional charge-offs during the second and third quarters of 2020. Cleco resumed disconnections and late fees beginning October 1, 2020. On July 16, 2020, Cleco Power began setting up payment plan arrangements for customers with past due balances to be repaid over a period of up to 18 months. For more information about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sales, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Overview — COVID-19.”
In August and October 2020, Cleco Power's distribution and transmission systems sustained substantial damage from three separate hurricanes, resulting in significant outages for its customers. On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall hitting the southwest coast of Louisiana causing power outages for approximately 140,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers. On October 9, 2020, Hurricane Delta made landfall in southwest Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 132,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers. On October 28, 2020, Hurricane Zeta made landfall in southeast Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 73,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers. For more information on Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Overview — Cleco Power — Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta.”
Customers
Cleco Power did not have a significant customer that accounted for 10% or more of Cleco or Cleco Power’s consolidated revenue in 2020, 2019, or 2018. For more information regarding Cleco Power’s sales and revenue, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations.”
Capital Investment Projects
For a discussion of certain Cleco Power major capital investment projects, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Overview — Cleco Power — Bayou Vista to Segura Transmission Project” and “— DSMART Project.”
Capital Expenditures and Financing
For information on Cleco Power’s capital expenditures, financing, and related matters, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Cash Generation and Cash Requirements — Capital Expenditures.”
Cleco Cajun
Power Generation
On February 4, 2019, Cleco Cajun acquired from NRG Energy all of the outstanding membership interests in NRG South Central. As a result, Cleco Cajun became a reportable segment. For more information about the Cleco Cajun Transaction, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 3 — Business Combinations.”
In December 2020, Cleco Cajun retired the 176-MW Sterlington generating facility located in Sterlington, Louisiana. As the facility had reached the end of its useful life, Cleco Cajun determined that it would be more cost effective to retire the Sterlington generating facility than it would be to make the necessary improvements to continue its operation.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to Cleco Cajun’s generating facilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GENERATING STATION | COMMENCEMENT OF COMMERCIAL OPERATION | RATED CAPACITY (MW) | | NET CAPACITY (MW) | (1) | PRIMARY FUEL USED FOR GENERATION | GENERATION TYPE |
Bayou Cove (2) | 2002 | | 225 | | (4) | 219 | | (4) | natural gas | combustion |
Big Cajun I | | | | | | | |
Unit 1 and Unit 2 | 1972 | | 220 | | | 185 | | | natural gas | steam |
Unit 3 and Unit 4 | 2001 | | 210 | | | 178 | | | natural gas | combustion |
Big Cajun II | | | | | | | |
Unit 1 | 1981 | | 580 | | | 537 | | | coal | steam |
Unit 2 | 1982 | | 540 | | | 579 | | | natural gas | steam |
Unit 3 | 1983 | | 341 | | (5) | 323 | | (5) | coal | steam |
Cottonwood (3) | 2003 | | 1,263 | | | 1,165 | | | natural gas | combined cycle |
| | | | | | | |
Total generating capability | | 3,379 | | | 3,186 | | | | |
(1) Based on capacity testing of the generating units and operational tests performed between September 2019 and August 2020. These amounts do not represent generating unit capacity for MISO planning reserve margins.
(2) Units 2, 3, and 4.
(3) Units 1, 2, 3, and 4. Upon closing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cottonwood Energy entered into the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback. For more information on the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 4 — Leases — Lessor Agreements — Cottonwood Sale Leaseback Agreement.”
(4) Represents Cleco Cajun’s 225-MW ownership interest in the capacity of Bayou Cove, a 300-MW generating station.
(5) Represents Cleco Cajun’s 58% ownership interest in the capacity of Big Cajun Unit 3, a 588-MW generating unit.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Fuel and Purchased Power
Cleco Cajun uses coal and natural gas for its power generation resources. Cleco Cajun procures these fuels under contracts from a variety of suppliers and transporters. Cleco Cajun maintains an inventory of coal supply on-site at its coal generating facilities. Cleco Cajun has a lease for 135 railcars for coal transportation, which commenced in February 2019 with an initial term of 12 months. On January 27, 2020, this lease was renewed and is set to expire on March 31, 2021. However, at the end of the current term, this lease will renew for additional one-month terms unless Cleco Cajun chooses to terminate.
Sales
Cleco Cajun sells wholesale electric supply in Louisiana, Texas, and Arkansas. It furnishes supply to its wholesale customers primarily through all-requirements power supply and service agreements, which require Cleco Cajun to provide the electric capacity, energy, and other services necessary to serve most of its customers’ load requirements. Cleco Cajun procures the entirety of the power required to fulfill these obligations through its participation in the MISO market.
Cleco Cajun’s business experiences seasonality, as it bills its customers based on actual electric energy consumed. This usage tends to be greater during periods of high and low temperatures as compared to periods of moderate temperatures.
Competition
Competition for Cleco Cajun’s customers is limited through 2025, when the majority of the wholesale electric supply contracts terminate. Cleco Cajun is currently participating in co-operative requests for proposals for load after 2025. Failure to recontract current cooperative load or enter into new contracts to replace the existing contracts could have a material adverse effect on Cleco Cajun's results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. Within MISO, competitors typically comprise of investor-owned utilities, independent power producers, power marketers, and power plant developers. These entities typically compete on the basis of price, reliability, and residual risk to the purchasing customer and its end users.
Customers
Cleco Cajun did not have a significant customer that accounted for 10% or more of Cleco’s consolidated revenue in 2020 or 2019. For more information regarding Cleco Cajun’s sales and revenue, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations.”
Capital Expenditures
For information on Cleco Cajun’s capital expenditures and related matters, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Cash Generation and Cash Requirements — Capital Expenditures.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
REGULATORY MATTERS, INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS, AND FRANCHISES |
Rates
Cleco Power’s electric operations are subject to the jurisdiction of the LPSC with respect to retail rates, standards of service, accounting, and other matters. Cleco Power is subject to the jurisdiction of FERC with respect to transmission tariffs, accounting, interconnections with other utilities, reliability, and the transmission of power. Periodically, Cleco Power has sought and received from both the LPSC and FERC increases in retail rates and transmission tariffs, respectively, to cover increases in operating costs and costs associated with additions to generation, transmission, and distribution facilities.
Cleco Cajun is subject to the jurisdiction of FERC with respect to transmission tariffs, interconnections with other utilities, reliability, and the transmission of power. The rates Cleco, through Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun, charges its wholesale customers are subject to FERC’s triennial market power analysis. The most recent triennial power analysis was filed on December 23, 2020.
Cleco Power’s annual retail earnings are subject to an FRP that was approved by the LPSC in June 2014. Under the terms of Cleco Power’s current FRP, Cleco Power is allowed to earn a target ROE of 10.0%, while providing the opportunity to earn up to 10.9%. Additionally, 60% of retail earnings between 10.9% and 11.75% and all retail earnings over 11.75% are required to be refunded to customers. The amount of credits due to customers, if any, is determined by Cleco Power and the LPSC annually. Credits are typically included on customers’ bills the following summer, but the amount and timing of the refunds are ultimately subject to LPSC approval.
Cleco Power’s FRP had a four-year term, and was set to expire in June 2018. As a result of the 2016 Merger, the FRP was extended an additional two years with an expiration of June 2020, and Cleco Power was required to file a new base rate case with the LPSC in June 2019 with any change in rates to be implemented in July 2020. On June 28, 2019, Cleco Power filed an application with the LPSC for a new FRP. However, there has been a delay in the current base rate case. Cleco Power has responded to multiple sets of data requests relating to the new FRP. Unless the 2014 FRP were to be extended by order of the LPSC, the FRP rates established in July 2019 will remain in effect. An FRP monitoring report for the 12-month period ending June 30, 2020, was not required. Cleco Power anticipates new rates to be effective in the first half of 2021. However, management is unable to determine the outcome of the base rate case relating to the new FRP.
Generally, Cleco Power’s cost of fuel used for electric generation and the cost of purchased power are recovered through the LPSC-established FAC that enables Cleco Power to pass on to its customers substantially all such charges. Recovery of FAC costs is subject to periodic fuel audits by the LPSC. For more information on the FAC and the most recent fuel audit, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — LPSC Audits — Fuel Audit.”
In 2009, the LPSC issued Docket No. U-29380 Subdocket A, which provides Cleco Power an EAC to recover from its customers certain costs of environmental compliance. These expenses are eligible for recovery through Cleco Power’s EAC
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
and are subject to periodic review by the LPSC. For more information on the EAC and the most recent environmental audit, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — LPSC Audits — Environmental Audit.”
For more information on the regulatory impacts of the TCJA on Cleco Power and the LPSC Staff’s FRP reviews, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 13 — Regulation and Rates — TCJA” and “— FRP.”
For more information on Cleco Power’s retail rates, including Cleco Power’s FRP, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Regulatory Risks — Cleco Power’s Rates,” “— Retail Electric Service,” and “— LPSC Audits” and Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Regulatory and Other Matters — Retail Rates of Cleco Power.” For more information on Cleco’s wholesale rates, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Regulatory Risks — Wholesale Electric Service” and Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Regulatory and Other Matters — Wholesale Rates.”
Franchises
Cleco Power operates under nonexclusive franchise rights granted by governmental units, such as municipalities and parishes (counties), and enforced by state law. These franchises are for fixed terms, which vary from 10 years to more than 50 years. Historically, Cleco Power has been substantially successful in the timely renewal of franchises as each neared the end of its term. Cleco Power’s next municipal franchise expires in April 2022.
Industry Developments
For information on industry developments, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Regulatory and Other Matters — Market Restructuring.”
Wholesale Electric Competition
For a discussion of wholesale electric competition, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Regulatory and Other Matters — Market Restructuring — Wholesale Electric Markets.”
Retail Electric Competition
For a discussion of retail electric competition, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Regulatory and Other Matters — Market Restructuring — Retail Electric Markets.”
Legislative and Regulatory Changes and Matters
Various federal and state legislative and regulatory bodies are considering a number of issues that could shape the future of the electric utility industry. Such issues include, among others:
•the ability of electric utilities to recover stranded costs,
•the impact of the TCJA on regulated public utilities,
•the role of electric utilities, independent power producers, and competitive bidding in the purchase, construction, and operation of new generating capacity,
•the role of electric utilities and independent transmission providers in competitive bidding in the construction of new transmission facilities,
•the pricing of transmission service on an electric utility’s transmission system, or the cost of transmission services provided by an RTO/ISO,
•FERC’s assessment of market power and a utility’s ability to buy generation assets,
•mandatory transmission reliability standards,
•NERC’s imposition of additional reliability and cybersecurity standards,
•the authority of FERC to grant utilities the power of eminent domain,
•increasing requirements for renewable energy sources,
•demand response and energy efficiency standards,
•comprehensive multi-emissions environmental regulation in the areas of air, water, and waste,
•regulation of greenhouse gas emissions,
•regulation of the disposal and management of CCRs from coal-fired power plants, and
•FERC’s increased ability to impose financial penalties.
At this time, management is unable to predict the outcome of such issues or the effects thereof on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
For information on certain regulatory matters and regulatory accounting affecting Cleco, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Regulatory and Other Matters.”
Environmental Quality
Cleco is subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. Violations of these laws and regulations may result in substantial fines and penalties. Cleco has obtained the environmental permits necessary for its operations, and management believes Cleco is in compliance in all material respects with these permits, as well as all applicable environmental laws and regulations. Environmental requirements affecting electric power facilities are complex, change frequently, and have become more stringent over time as a result of new legislation, administrative actions, and judicial interpretations. Therefore, the capital costs and other expenditures necessary to comply with existing and new environmental requirements are difficult to determine. Cleco Power may request recovery of the costs to comply with certain environmental laws and regulations from its retail customers. If revenue relief were to be approved by the LPSC, then Cleco Power’s retail rates could increase. If the LPSC were to deny Cleco Power’s request to recover all or part of its
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
environmental compliance costs, then Cleco Power would bear those costs directly. Such a decision could negatively impact the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants. For Cleco Power’s expected capital expenditures related to environmental compliance in 2021, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Cash Generation and Cash Requirements — Capital Expenditures.”
Air Quality
Air emissions from each of Cleco’s generating units are strictly regulated by the EPA and the LDEQ. The LDEQ has authority over and implements certain air quality programs established by the EPA under the federal CAA, as well as its own air quality regulations. The LDEQ establishes standards of performance and requires permits for EGUs in Louisiana. All of Cleco’s generating units are subject to these requirements.
The EPA has proposed and adopted rules under the authority of the CAA relevant to the emissions of SO2 and NOx from Cleco’s generating units.
Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP)
The CAA contains a regional haze program with the goal of returning Class I Federal areas of the nation to natural visibility by 2064. States are required to develop a regional haze SIP and revise it every ten years. A SIP must include requirements for the installation of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for applicable EGUs in Louisiana. The EPA issued a final approval of the Louisiana SIP for the first planning phase in December 2017. Although the approval was appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit by the Sierra Club and the National Parks Conservation Association, the court denied all the challenges to the EPA’s approval of the Louisiana Regional Haze SIP. Because the Louisiana SIP mandates use of existing controls and participation in the Cross State Air Pollution rule as BART, Cleco does not believe the Louisiana SIP will have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants. The second planning period for the regional haze program covers the period from 2018 through 2028 and requires states to adopt SIPs that make reasonable further progress toward achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I Federal areas. The SIP for the second planning phase is due to be submitted to the EPA by July 31, 2021. Until the LDEQ determines what the reasonable progress requirements are for Cleco units and completes its update of the SIP and the EPA approves the SIP, Cleco is unable to predict if the second phase SIP will have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Acid Rain Program
The CAA also established the Acid Rain Program to address the effects of acid rain and imposed restrictions on acid rain-causing SO2 emissions from certain generating units. The CAA requires these EGUs to possess a regulatory allowance for each ton of SO2 emitted beginning in the year 2000. The EPA allocates a set number of allowances to each affected unit based on its historic emissions. Cleco had sufficient allowances for operations in 2020 and expects to have sufficient allowances for 2021 operations under the Acid Rain Program.
The Acid Rain Program also established emission rate limits on NOx emissions for certain generating units.
Compliance with the acid rain permit limits for NOx has been achieved at all affected facilities.
CSAPR
In October 2016, the EPA published the finalized CSAPR update for the 2008 ozone NAAQS in the Federal Register. As a result, the EPA proposed Federal Implementation Plans (FIP) that update the EGU CSAPR NOx ozone-season emission budgets and implemented the budgets through the existing CSAPR NOx ozone-season allowance trading program. The FIP required implementation beginning with the 2017 ozone season. These rules did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
On September 13, 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals partially remanded the CSAPR update rule to the EPA because the rule did not set a deadline by which upwind states must eliminate their significant contribution to downwind states’ NAAQS nonattainment. In response to the remand of the rule, on October 30, 2020, the EPA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register, Revised Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Update for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, until the EPA and LDEQ have published and implemented the plan, Cleco is unable to predict if this will have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
In October 2015, the EPA promulgated a revision to the 2015 ozone NAAQS, lowering the level of both the primary and secondary standards to 70 ppb. Under the CAA, each state is required to submit a SIP that provides for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of each primary and secondary NAAQS. In particular, each SIP must contain adequate provisions prohibiting emissions activity within the state which will contribute significantly to non-attainment or interfere with maintenance by any other state with respect to any such primary or secondary ambient air quality standard. This “good neighbor” SIP is to be submitted to the EPA by the state within three years of promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS. The EPA determined that the SIP submittal by Louisiana meets the SIP completeness criteria. However, on February 28, 2020, the EPA issued a proposed rule that indicated it would take separate actions on sub elements of the SIP that are to prohibit emissions to other states which will (1) significantly contribute to nonattainment of the NAAQS and (2) interfere with maintenance of the NAAQS. Cleco is unable to predict the future impact of any requirements imposed under the “good neighbor” SIP for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
MATS
For more information on the legal proceedings of the MATS ruling, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — LPSC Audits — Environmental Audit.”
On February 7, 2019, the EPA published in the Federal Register a proposed rule in which it proposed to find, after considering the cost of compliance relative to the hazardous air pollutant (HAP) benefits, that regulation of HAP emissions under section 112 of the CAA is not appropriate and necessary, which would reverse the EPA’s prior conclusions. However, the EPA further proposed that this new determination would not remove the Coal-and Oil-Fired source category from the CAA list of sources that must be regulated and would not
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
affect the existing HAP emissions standards. In addition, the proposal presented the results of the required residual risk and technology review which indicate that residual risks due to HAP emissions from this source category are acceptable and that the current standards provide an ample margin to protect human health. The proposed rule was finalized and published in the Federal Register on May 22, 2020. The final regulation mirrors the elements of the proposed rule. Cleco is in compliance with the rule. This rule did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants. Several petitions for review of the rule’s findings were filed between May and July 2020 in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. On January 20, 2021, the new Presidential administration issued an executive order which directs federal agency heads to review regulations and other actions over the past four years to determine if they are inconsistent with the policies announced in the executive order. The order specifically directs the EPA to consider issuing a proposed rule by August 2021 to suspend, revise, or rescind the rule.
On April 12, 2019, the EPA published in the Federal Register proposed amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Combustion Turbines to address the results of the required periodic residual risk and technology review of the regulations. The EPA proposed to find that risks from this source category due to air toxics emissions are acceptable and that the existing rule provides an adequate margin of safety to protect public health. The EPA also identified no new cost-effective controls under the technology review that would achieve further emissions reductions from the source category. In addition, the EPA proposed to remove the stay of effectiveness of the emission standards for new lean premix and diffusion flame gas-fired turbines that had been promulgated in 2004. If the stay were lifted as proposed, emission limits could be applied to new or reconstructed lean premix and diffusion flame turbines. In the final rule, which was published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2020, the EPA did not take final action to lift the stay of effectiveness. However, on August 13, 2020, the EPA granted a petition for reconsideration of certain aspects of the EPA’s residual risk and technology review. The EPA indicated it will undertake a rulemaking to address issues in the petition, but also noted that a petition to delist the entire source category remains pending and their decision on that petition could impact this planned rulemaking. Until the EPA has responded to the petitions, Cleco cannot determine if the rule will have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrant.
CPP/ACE and NSPS
In August 2015, the EPA released the final guidelines referred to as the CPP. These guidelines provided each state with standards for CO2 emissions from the existing units of the state’s utility industry. The EPA derived the limits for each state through a strategy involving a combination of unit efficiency improvements, dispatching away from boilers to combined cycle units, and applying renewable energy. The CPP required significant reductions of CO2 emissions and set interim and final CO2 emission goals for each state. The interim emission goals were scheduled to begin in 2022, with final emission goals required by 2030. In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay of the CPP to remain in place until the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on the merits and any ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court.
In August 2015, the EPA released the NSPS rules for CO2 emissions from new, modified, or reconstructed units. The rules set requirements and conditions with respect to CO2 emission standards for new units and those that are modified or reconstructed. Cleco does not anticipate a modification or reconstruction of its existing sources that would trigger the application of the CO2 emission limits.
In March 2017, the executive order of Energy Independence was issued. Among other measures, the order directed the EPA to review the CPP, the proposed FIP for the CPP, and the GHG new source performance standards (NSPS). On July 8, 2019, the EPA published in the Federal Register a final rule repealing the CPP and issuing a replacement to the CPP, informally known as the ACE rule. The ACE rule requires state agencies to set standards of performance for each affected generating unit and submit the implementation plan to the EPA for approval by July 8, 2022, with compliance expected within 24 months thereafter. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the EPA’s repeal of the CPP and its 2019 promulgation of ACE were unlawful. The Court therefore issued an order to vacate and remand ACE to the EPA. The Court’s mandate has not yet been issued to allow parties to request reconsideration of the ruling. On January 20, 2021, the new Presidential administration issued an executive order which directs federal agency heads to review regulations and other actions over the past four years to determine if they are inconsistent with the policies announced in the executive order. The administration also released a non-exhaustive list of agency actions to be reviewed, which includes the ACE rule. Until the Court’s opinion has been determined to be final and the EPA has responded to the Court’s opinion and executive order, management cannot determine the future regulatory requirements for GHGs for the utility industry and the potential impact on Cleco’s existing affected units. However, any new rules that require significant reductions in CO2 emissions for existing EGUs could require significant capital expenditures or curtailment of operations of certain EGUs to achieve compliance.
In December 2018, the EPA published proposed rules to replace the August 2015 NSPS rules for CO2 emissions from new, modified, or reconstructed units. As with the current NSPS rules, the proposed rules set requirements and conditions with respect to CO2 emission standards for new, modified, or reconstructed units. Cleco does not anticipate a future modification or future reconstruction of its existing units, as defined in the proposal, that would trigger the application of the proposed CO2 emission limits. Until the EPA finalizes the rule, management cannot state what the final standards will entail or if the new rule will have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)
The enactment of federal or state RPS mandating the use of renewable and alternative fuel sources such as wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal energy could result in certain changes in Cleco’s business or its competitive position. These changes could include additional costs for renewable energy credits, alternate compliance payments, or capital expenditures for renewable generation resources. RPS legislation has been enacted in many states, and Congress is considering various bills that would create a national RPS. Cleco continues to evaluate the impacts of potential RPS
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
legislation on its business based on the RPS programs in other states.
NAAQS
A primary NAAQS for NO2 promulgated by the EPA became effective in April 2010. The EPA established a new one-hour standard at a level of 100 ppb to supplement the existing annual standard. In 2012, the EPA determined that no area in the country was violating the standard. In April 2018, the EPA published, following the required review of the NAAQS, a final action that retains the ambient air standards for NO2. The EPA may redesignate areas based on new data it receives from states. Due to the fact that fossil fuel-fired EGUs are a significant source of NO2 emissions in the country, a non-attainment designation could result in utilities such as Cleco being required to substantially reduce their NO2 emissions. However, because the EPA has not yet completed any new designations, Cleco cannot predict the likelihood or potential impacts of such a rule on its generating units at this time.
The EPA revised the NAAQS for SO2 in June 2010. The new standard is now a one-hour health standard of 75 ppb, designed to reduce short-term exposures to SO2 ranging from five minutes to 24 hours. An important aspect of the new SO2 standard is a revised emission monitoring network combined with a new ambient air modeling approach to determine compliance with the new standard. The EPA expects to use monitoring or modeling data developed in the future to confirm the status of areas that currently have no monitoring data. Classification of those areas without adequate data will be deferred until adequate data has been developed. In January 2018, the EPA published a final rule designating all areas containing Cleco generation facilities as either attainment/unclassifiable or unclassifiable. Therefore, there is no adverse impact to Cleco’s generating units.
On March 18, 2019, the EPA published, following the required review of the NAAQS, a final action that retains the ambient air standards for SO2. The EPA may redesignate areas based on new data it receives from states. Due to the fact that fossil fuel-fired EGUs are a significant source of SO2 emissions in the country, a non-attainment designation could result in utilities such as Cleco being required to substantially reduce their SO2 emissions. However, because the EPA has not yet completed any new designations, Cleco cannot predict the likelihood or potential impacts of such a rule on its generating units at this time.
Other
On May 2, 2019, Louisiana Generating notified the EPA and the LDEQ that it has elected not to Retrofit (as such term is defined in the Consent Decree) Big Cajun II, Unit 1.
Water Quality
Cleco’s facilities are subject to federal and state laws and regulations regarding wastewater discharges. Cleco has received, from the EPA and the LDEQ, permits required under the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) for wastewater discharges from its generating stations. Wastewater discharge permits have fixed dates of expiration, and Cleco applies for renewal of these permits within the applicable time periods.
In March 2011, the EPA proposed regulations which would establish standards for cooling water intake structures at existing power plants and other facilities pursuant to Section 316(b) of the CWA. The EPA published its final rule in August 2014. The standards are intended to protect fish and other
aquatic wildlife by minimizing capture, both in screens attached to intake structures (impingement mortality) and in the actual intake structures themselves (entrainment mortality). The proposed standards would (1) set a performance standard, dealing with fish impingement mortality or reduce the flow velocity at cooling water intakes to less than 0.5 feet per second and (2) require entrainment standards to be determined on a case-by-case basis by state-delegated permitting authorities. Facilities subject to the proposed standards are required to complete a number of studies within a 45-month period and then comply with the rule as soon as possible after the next discharge permit renewal, by a date determined by the permitting authorities. Portions of the final rule could apply to a number of Cleco’s fossil fuel steam electric generating stations. Until the required studies are conducted, including technical and economic evaluations of the control options available, and regulatory agency officials have reviewed the studies and made determinations, Cleco remains uncertain as to which technology options or retrofits will be required to be installed on its affected facilities. The costs of required technology options and retrofits may be significant, particularly if closed cycle cooling is required.
The CWA requires the EPA to periodically review and, if appropriate, revise technology-based effluent limitations guidelines for categories of industrial facilities, including power generating facilities. In November 2015, the EPA released the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category rule (ELG rule). The rule is focused on reducing the discharge of metals in wastewater from generating facilities to surface waters.
In April 2017, the EPA Administrator indicated that it is appropriate and in the public interest to reconsider the rule. In September 2017, the EPA published a rule postponing for a two year period the earliest compliance dates for some of the wastewater streams that fall under the ELG rule. On October 13, 2020, the EPA published final revisions to the rule that would revise the technology-based effluent limitation guidelines and standards applicable to flue gas desulfurization and bottom ash transport waste waters. The rule may require costly technological upgrades at Cleco’s facilities, particularly if additional wastewater treatment systems are required to be installed or if waste streams must be eliminated. Until Cleco and the agencies have come to agreement on how compliance with the rule will be achieved, management cannot predict what the final standards will entail, what controls the EPA and the state of Louisiana may require of Cleco, or if the new rule will have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Solid Waste Disposal
In the course of operations, Cleco’s facilities generate solid and hazardous waste materials requiring eventual disposal. The Solid Waste Division of the LDEQ has adopted a permitting system for the management and disposal of solid waste generated by power stations. Cleco has received all required permits from the LDEQ for the on-site disposal of solid waste from its generating stations.
In April 2015, the EPA published a final rule in the Federal Register for regulating the disposal and management of CCRs from coal-fired power plants (CCR Rule). The federal regulation classifies CCRs as nonhazardous waste under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and allows beneficial use of CCRs with some restrictions. The rule establishes extensive requirements for existing and new
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
CCR landfills and surface impoundments and all lateral expansions consisting of location restrictions, design and operating criteria, groundwater monitoring and corrective action, closure requirements and post closure care, and recordkeeping, notification, and Internet posting requirements. In August 2018, the D.C. Court of Appeals vacated several requirements in the CCR regulation which included eliminating the previous acceptability of compacted clay material as a liner for impoundments. As a result, on December 2, 2019, the EPA published a proposed rule that would set deadlines for costly modifications including retrofitting of clay-lined impoundments with compliant liners or closure of the impoundments. The rule was finalized and published in the Federal Register on August 28, 2020. In November 2020, Cleco submitted demonstrations to the EPA specifying its intended course of action for Rodemacher Unit 2, Dolet Hills Power Station, and Big Cajun II in order to comply with the final rule. The demonstrations are subject to EPA approval.
On November 12, 2020, the EPA published in the Federal Register a final regulation containing impoundment procedures that allow sources to demonstrate liners and underlying soils perform as well as the CCR rule liner criteria and to request approval to continue operating the impoundments. On December 14, 2020, Cleco submitted to the EPA an application and notice of intent to submit an alternate liner demonstration for Rodemacher Unit 2. The application is subject to EPA approval.
On January 20, 2021, the new Presidential administration issued an executive order which directs federal agency heads to review regulations and other actions over the past four years to determine if they are inconsistent with the policies announced in the executive order. The administration also released a nonexhaustive list of agency actions to be reviewed, which includes the CCR rules promulgated in July 2018 and August 2020.
Cleco Power continues to be subject to state regulations pertaining to the disposal of coal ash. Cleco Cajun is also subject to state regulations pertaining to the disposal of coal ash. As a result, Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun have an ARO for the retirement of certain ash disposal facilities. All costs of the CCR rule for Cleco Power are expected to be recovered from its customers in future rates. The actual asset retirement costs related to the CCR rule requirements may vary substantially from the estimates used to record the increased obligation due to the uncertainty about the compliance strategies that will be used and the preliminary nature of available data used to estimate costs. In October 2020, Cleco Power recorded an increase in its ARO of $0.3 million as a result of the CCR rule. In October 2020, Cleco Cajun recorded an increase in its ARO of $1.1 million as a result of the CCR rule. Cleco will continue to gather additional data in future periods and will make decisions about compliance strategies and the timing of closure activities. As additional information becomes available and management makes decisions about compliance strategies and the timing of closure activities, Cleco will update the ARO balances to reflect these changes in estimates. For more information on Cleco Power’s current AROs, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 6 — Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — AROs.”
In December 2016, the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (WIIN Act), including the WIIN Act’s provisions regarding CCRs was signed into law. The WIIN Act’s CCR provisions require the EPA to establish a
CCR permitting program. It also allows for implementation of the federal CCR rule through a state-based permit program. On February 20, 2020, the EPA published in the Federal Register a proposed rule establishing the federal permit program. Permits will be required for all CCR units in states that do not have state permit programs. Until the state of Louisiana has evaluated the WIIN Act and made a decision on implementing a state-based option, Cleco cannot determine if there will be a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Cleco produces certain wastes that are classified as hazardous at its electric generating stations and at other locations. Cleco does not treat, store long-term, or dispose of these wastes on-site; therefore, no permits are required. Hazardous wastes produced by Cleco are properly disposed of at permitted hazardous waste disposal sites.
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
The TSCA directs the EPA to regulate the marketing, disposing, manufacturing, processing, distributing in commerce, and usage of various toxic substances, including PCBs. Cleco operates and may continue to operate equipment containing PCBs under the TSCA. Once the equipment reaches the end of its useful life, the EPA regulates handling and disposing of the equipment and fluids containing PCBs. Within these regulations, handling and disposing is allowed only through facilities approved and permitted by the EPA. Cleco properly disposes of its PCB waste material at TSCA-permitted disposal facilities.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
The CERCLA imposes liability on parties responsible for, in whole or in part, the presence of hazardous substances at a site. In 2007, Cleco received a Special Notice for Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) from the EPA for a facility known as the Devil’s Swamp Lake site located just northwest of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The notice requested that Cleco and Cleco Power, along with many other listed potentially responsible parties (PRP), enter into negotiations with the EPA for the performance of an RI/FS at the Devil’s Swamp Lake site. In 2008 the EPA identified Cleco as one of many companies that sent PCB wastes for disposal to the site. The EPA proposed to add the Devil’s Swamp Lake site to the National Priorities List, based on the release of PCBs to fisheries and wetlands located on the site, but no final listing decision has been made. The EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order to two PRPs, Clean Harbors, Inc. and Baton Rouge Disposal, to conduct an RI/FS in 2009. The Tier 1 part of the study was completed in June 2012. The tier 2 remedial investigation report, that fish and crawfish from the area should not be eaten, was made public in December 2015. On September 9, 2019, the EPA publicly announced a proposed cleanup strategy for the Superfund Site. Until a final plan is presented by the EPA, management is unable to determine how significant Cleco’s share of the costs associated with a possible response action at the site, if any, may be and whether this will have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
Section 313 of the EPCRA requires certain facilities that manufacture, process, or otherwise use minimum quantities of listed toxic chemicals to file an annual report with the EPA called a Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) report. The TRI report requires industrial facilities to report on approximately 650 substances that the facilities release into the air, water, and land. The TRI report ranks companies based on the amount of a particular substance they release on a state and parish (county) level. Annual reports are due to the EPA on July 1 following the reporting year-end. Cleco has submitted required TRI reports on its activities, and the TRI rankings are available
to the public. The rankings do not result in any federal or state penalties.
Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMFs)
The possibility that exposure to EMFs emanating from electric power lines, household appliances, and other electric devices may result in adverse health effects and damage to the environment has been a subject of some public attention. Lawsuits alleging that the presence of electric power transmission and distribution lines has an adverse effect on health and/or property values have arisen in several states. Neither Cleco nor Cleco Power are parties in any lawsuits related to EMFs.
The following risk factors could have a material adverse effect on results and cause results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Registrants.
Holding Company
Cleco Holdings is a holding company and its ability to meet its debt obligations is dependent on the cash generated by its subsidiaries.
Cleco Holdings is a holding company and conducts its operations primarily through its subsidiaries. Accordingly, Cleco Holdings’ ability to meet its debt obligations is largely dependent upon the cash generated by these subsidiaries. Cleco Holdings’ subsidiaries are separate and distinct entities and have no obligations to pay any amounts due on Cleco Holdings’ debt or to make any funds available for such payment. In addition, Cleco Holdings’ subsidiaries’ ability to make dividend payments or other distributions to Cleco Holdings may be restricted by their obligations to holders of their outstanding securities and to other general business creditors. Substantially all of Cleco’s consolidated assets are held by either Cleco Power or Cleco Cajun. Cleco Holdings’ right to receive any assets of any subsidiary, and therefore the right of its creditors to participate in those assets, will be structurally subordinated to the claims of that subsidiary’s creditors, including trade creditors. In addition, even if Cleco Holdings were a creditor of any subsidiary, its rights as a creditor would be effectively subordinated to any security interest in the assets of that subsidiary and any indebtedness of the subsidiary ranking senior to that held by Cleco Holdings. Cleco Power is subject to regulation by the LPSC. The 2016 Merger Commitments also provide for limitations on the amount of distributions that may be paid from Cleco Power to Cleco Holdings, depending on Cleco Power’s common equity ratio and its corporate credit/issuer ratings. As a result, Cleco Power may be prohibited from making distributions to Cleco Holdings.
Future Electricity Sales
Cleco Power’s future electricity sales and corresponding base revenue and cash flows and Cleco Cajun’s future wholesale revenue and cash flows could be negatively affected by adverse macroeconomic conditions.
Adverse macroeconomic conditions resulting in low economic growth can negatively impact the businesses of Cleco Power’s residential, commercial, wholesale, and industrial customers, and Cleco Cajun’s wholesale customers resulting in decreased power consumption, which causes a corresponding decrease in base revenue for Cleco Power and revenue for Cleco Cajun. Reduced production or the shutdown of customer facilities could substantially reduce Cleco Power’s base revenue and Cleco Cajun’s revenue.
Energy conservation, energy efficiency efforts, and other factors that reduce energy demand could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Regulatory and legislative bodies have proposed or introduced requirements and incentives to reduce energy consumption. Conservation and energy efficiency programs are designed to reduce energy demand. Future electricity sales could be impacted by customers switching to alternative sources of energy, such as solar and wind, on-site power generation, and retail customers purchasing less electricity due to increased conservation efforts or expanded energy efficiency measures. Declining usage could result in an under-recovery of fixed costs at Cleco Power’s rate regulated business. An increase in energy conservation, energy efficiency efforts, and other efforts that reduce energy demand could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Weather Sensitivity
Cleco’s operations and power generation could be harmed due to the impact of severe weather events, other natural disasters, or climate change, which could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Severe weather, including hurricanes, winter storms, tropical storms, and other natural disasters, such as floods, can affect transportation of fuel to plant sites and can be destructive, causing outages, blackouts or disruptions of interconnected transmission systems, and property damage that can potentially result in additional expenses, lower revenue, and additional capital restoration costs. Extreme drought conditions can impact the availability of cooling water to support the operations of generating plants, which can also result in additional expenses and lower revenue. Extreme weather conditions could also increase commodity prices, including fuel, which could have a material adverse effect on Cleco’s results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Climate change that results in more frequent and more severe weather events in Cleco’s service territories, could result in one or more physical risks, such as an increase in sea level, wind and storm surge damages, wetland and barrier island erosion, risks of flooding, and changes in weather conditions, such as changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, and potential increased impacts of extreme winter weather conditions, including ice storms, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants. The Registrants’ assets are in and serve communities that are at risk from sea level rise, changes in weather conditions, and loss of the protection offered by coastal wetlands. In addition, a significant portion of the nation’s oil and gas infrastructure is located in these areas and is susceptible to storm damage that could be aggravated by wetland and barrier island erosion, which could give rise to fuel supply interruptions and price spikes.
For example, in August and October 2020, Cleco Power’s service territory sustained substantial damage from three separate hurricanes. On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall hitting the southwest coast of Louisiana causing power outages for approximately 140,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers. On October 9, 2020, Hurricane Delta made landfall in southwest Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 132,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers. On October 28, 2020, Hurricane Zeta made landfall in southeast Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 73,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers. Also, in February 2021, two separate severe winter storms, Winter Storms Uri and Viola, moved through Louisiana impacting Cleco’s service territories in central and south Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 11,000 and 43,000, respectively, of Cleco Power’s customers. For more information on the hurricanes and severe winter storms, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 19 — Storm Restoration.”
Any future severe weather, other natural disaster, or physical changes resulting from climate change could cause damage to, or the loss of, Cleco’s equipment and facilities, which could result in Cleco incurring additional costs, such as the cost to restore service, repair damaged facilities, or obtain replacement power. Any future severe weather, other natural
disaster, or physical changes resulting from climate change could also result in changes in demand for and usage of electricity in Cleco’s service territory and the service territory of Cleco’s wholesale customers. The delivery of equipment and supplies necessary to Cleco’s business could also be disrupted. Cleco Power’s recovery of costs associated with these events is subject to LPSC review and approval, and the LPSC could disallow timely and full recovery of the costs incurred. These risks and other possible effects of severe weather, other natural disasters, and climate change could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
The operating results of Cleco are affected by weather conditions and may fluctuate on a seasonal basis.
Weather conditions directly influence the demand for electricity, particularly with respect to residential customers. In Cleco’s service territory, demand for power typically peaks during the hot summer months. As a result, Cleco’s financial results may fluctuate on a seasonal basis. In addition, Cleco has sold less power and, consequently, earned less income when weather conditions were milder. Unusually mild weather in the future could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
An increase in costs resulting from Winter Storms Uri and Viola could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity of the Registrants.
In February 2021, Cleco’s service territory experienced extreme and unprecedented winter weather that resulted in damage to Cleco Power’s distribution and transmission assets, electricity generation supply shortages, and natural gas supply shortages and increased wholesale prices of natural gas in the United States, primarily due to prolonged freezing temperatures, which impacted, and may continue to impact, the Registrants’ business.
On February 14, 2021, Winter Storm Uri reached Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 11,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in south Louisiana. By February 17, 2021, power was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power. On February 17, 2021, Winter Storm Viola reached Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 43,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and south Louisiana. By February 22, 2021, power was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power. Cleco Power’s current estimate of the total storm restoration costs related to Winter Storms Uri and Viola is between $9.0 million and $10.0 million. Cleco Power continues its restoration efforts as damage to its distribution and transmission assets is still being assessed.
On February 16, 2021, Cleco was notified by the regional reliability coordinator, MISO, that extremely cold temperatures were causing an increase in demand for power, which resulted in an overload of the power grid. The electricity generation shortages necessitated MISO to implement controlled outages in certain of its service areas. To help protect the stability of the power grid and prevent prolonged outages, MISO instructed Cleco to reduce demand on the power grid by initiating periodic outages to customers across Louisiana. The periodic power outages were minimal and suspended within one hour of initiation at the direction of MISO because the power shortage was no longer threatening the reliability of the power grid.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Cleco Power’s current estimate of incremental fuel and purchased power costs incurred as a result of Winter Storms Uri and Viola is between $45.0 million and $55.0 million. As a result of the increase in net purchased power costs exceeding its unsecured credit capacity with MISO, on February 24, 2021, Cleco Power posted collateral in the amount of $21.0 million with MISO. Cleco Power expects to settle the majority of its power purchase obligations with MISO associated with the winter storms and eliminate associated collateral postings by March 9, 2021. The amount of incremental fuel and purchased power costs are preliminary estimates and subject to final settlement. Management expects to seek recovery of these costs through Cleco Power’s FAC. Recovery of these costs are subject to LPSC review and the LPSC could disallow timely and full recovery of these costs. Recovery of these costs could result in rising utility bills threatening the affordability of such costs by Cleco Power’s customers in certain demographic areas, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Cleco Cajun currently estimates the incremental negative impact of Winter Storms Uri and Viola on operations to be between $10.0 million and $15.0 million. As a result of the increase in net purchased power costs exceeding its unsecured credit capacity with MISO, on February 24, 2021, Cleco Cajun posted collateral in the amount of $5.0 million with MISO. Cleco Cajun expects to settle the majority of its power purchase obligations with MISO associated with the winter storms and eliminate associated collateral postings by March 9, 2021. The incremental impact to Cleco Cajun’s operations is a preliminary estimate and subject to final settlement.
Management is still assessing the expected impact that these winter storms and related events will have on the Registrants’ financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or liquidity. For information on risks related to MISO market operations and the ability of Cleco Power to recover costs incurred, see “— MISO” and “— LPSC Audits.”
Workforce
Failure to attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Certain events, such as an aging workforce without appropriate replacements, lack of equivalent and enhanced skill sets to fulfill future needs, or unavailability of contract resources, may lead to operating challenges and increased costs. The challenges include lack of resources, loss of knowledge, difficulty in finding qualified candidates due to geographic locations, and a lengthy time period associated with skill development. In this case, costs, including costs for contractors to replace employees, productivity costs, and safety costs, may rise. Failure to hire and adequately train replacement employees, including the transfer of significant internal historical knowledge and expertise to new employees, or the future availability and cost of contract labor may adversely affect the ability to manage and operate the Registrants’ businesses. If the Registrants are unable to successfully attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants could be materially adversely affected.
Technology and Terrorism Threats
The operational and information technology systems on which Cleco relies to conduct its business and serve customers could fail to function properly due to technological problems, cyberattacks, physical attacks on Cleco’s assets, acts of terrorism, severe weather, solar events, electromagnetic events, natural disasters, the age and condition of information technology assets, human error, or other reasons that could disrupt Cleco’s operations and cause Cleco to incur unanticipated losses and expense.
The operation of Cleco’s extensive electrical systems relies on evolving operational and information technology systems and network infrastructures that are becoming extremely complex as new technologies and systems are implemented to more safely and reliably deliver electric services. Cleco’s business is highly dependent on its ability to process and monitor, on a real-time daily basis, a large number of tasks and transactions, many of which are highly complex. Due to the current COVID-19 working environment, there is a greater opportunity for successful cyberattacks. The failure of Cleco’s operational and information technology systems and networks due to a physical attack or cyberattack, or other event would significantly disrupt operations; cause harm to the public or employees; result in outages or reduced generating output; result in damage to Cleco’s assets or operations, or those of third parties; and subject Cleco to claims by customers or third parties, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Cleco’s systems, including its financial information, operational, advanced metering, and billing systems, require constant maintenance, monitoring, security patches, modification or configuration of systems, and update and upgrade of systems, which can be costly and increase the risk of errors and malfunction. Any disruptions or deficiencies in existing systems, or disruptions, delays, or deficiencies in the modification, transition to, or implementation of new systems, could result in increased costs, the inability to track or collect revenues and the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention and resources, and could adversely affect the effectiveness of Cleco’s control environment, and/or its ability to accurately or timely file required regulatory reports.
Despite implementation of security and mitigation measures, all of Cleco’s technology systems and those of Cleco’s vendors are vulnerable to inoperability, impaired operations, or failures due to physical attacks or cyberattacks on the facilities and equipment needed to operate the technology systems, viruses, human errors, acts of war or terrorism, and other events. If Cleco’s or its vendor’s information technology systems or network infrastructure were to fail, Cleco might be unable to fulfill critical business functions and serve its customers, which could have a material adverse effect on the financial conditions, results of operations, or cash flows of the Registrants. For example, on December 13, 2020, Cleco’s third party provider publicly confirmed a breach of its monitoring products in which a vulnerability was inserted and, if present and activated, could potentially allow an attacker to compromise the server on which the products run. Although Cleco has found no impact to the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of its data or systems to date, the incident is still under investigation by the third party provider. Cleco is unable to predict the outcome of this investigation and the extent to which Cleco could be affected in the future.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
In addition, in the ordinary course of its business, Cleco collects and retains sensitive information including personal identification information about customers and employees, customer energy usage, and other confidential information. The theft, damage, or improper disclosure of sensitive electronic data could subject Cleco to both penalties for violation of applicable privacy laws and claims from third parties, or harm Cleco’s reputation. In addition, new laws and regulations governing data privacy and the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and potentially elevate costs, and any failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in significant penalties and legal liability.
COVID-19
The Registrants face risks related to COVID-19 and other health epidemics and outbreaks, including economic, regulatory, legal, workforce, and cybersecurity risks, which could have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or liquidity of the Registrants.
The continued COVID-19 pandemic is adversely affecting current global economic activities and conditions. An extended slowdown of economic growth, decreased demand for commodities, and/or material changes in governmental or regulatory policy in the U.S. could result in lower growth and reduced demand for and usage of electricity in Cleco’s service territory, and those of its wholesale customers, as businesses and facilities continue to close, remain closed, or implement reduced working hours. The ability of Cleco’s customers, contractors, and suppliers to meet their obligations to Cleco, including payment obligations, could also be negatively affected under the current economic conditions.
Beginning on March 13, 2020, and as a result of an LPSC executive order, Cleco Power suspended the assessment of late fees, disconnections, and the utilization of collection agencies to help customers facing financial challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic. On July 1, 2020, the LPSC issued an order ending the moratorium on disconnections effective July 16, 2020. Cleco resumed disconnections and late fees beginning October 1, 2020. On July 16, 2020, Cleco began setting up interest-free payment plan arrangements for customers with past due balances to be repaid over a period of up to 18 months. On December 4, 2020, Cleco Power made a filing with the LPSC requesting the recovery of the regulatory asset as well as the lost revenue associated with the disconnect fees and incremental costs. Failure to collect these balances could negatively impact Cleco’s cash flow. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had a regulatory asset of $3.0 million for expenses incurred.
The LPSC, in response to a federal mandate or otherwise, could impose restrictions on the rates Cleco charges to provide its services, including the inability to implement approved rates, or delay actions with respect to Cleco Power’s base rate case and filings. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic may affect Cleco’s ability to timely satisfy regulatory requirements such as recordkeeping and/or timely reporting requirements. Additionally, as the EPA and many state environmental agencies have issued enforcement discretion policies for such issues, it is unclear whether the effect of any possible noncompliance due to COVID-19 will be material.
On May 18, 2020, Cleco reopened customer service offices implementing precautionary protective measures and protocols to allow in-person meetings with restrictions in size
and mandatory protective gear. Cleco has also implemented precautionary measures for employees or contractors testing positive for COVID-19, exhibiting COVID-19 symptoms, or awaiting COVID-19 test results. In the event a substantial portion of Cleco’s workforce were to be impacted by COVID-19 for an extended period of time, Cleco may face challenges with respect to its services or operations, and it may not be able to execute its capital plan as anticipated. There is considerable uncertainty regarding the extent to which COVID-19 will continue to spread and the extent and duration of governmental and other measures implemented to try to slow the spread of COVID-19, such as large-scale travel bans and restrictions, border closures, quarantines, shelter-in-place orders, and business and government shutdowns. Restrictions of this nature have caused, and may continue to cause, Cleco, its suppliers, and other business counterparties to experience operational delays. As the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly worsened in the U.S. during the winter months, this may cause federal, state, and local governments to reconsider restrictions on business and social activities. In the event governments increase restrictions, the reopening of the economy may be further curtailed. Cleco has modified and continues to modify certain business and workforce practices (including those related to employee travel, employee work locations, and cancellation of physical participation in meetings, events and conferences) to conform to government restrictions and best practices encouraged by governmental and regulatory authorities. However, the quarantine of personnel or the inability to access Cleco’s facilities or customer sites could adversely affect its operations. Also, Cleco has a limited number of highly skilled employees for some of its operations. If a large proportion of Cleco’s employees in those critical positions were to contract COVID-19 simultaneously, Cleco would rely upon its business continuity plans in an effort to continue operations at its facilities which includes sequestering those key employees. However, there is no certainty that such measures will be sufficient to mitigate the adverse impact to Cleco’s operations that could result from shortages of highly skilled employees.
As many of Cleco’s employees and third-party service providers work remotely in accordance with government mandates, Cleco faces heightened cybersecurity risks related to unauthorized system access, aggressive social engineering tactics, and adversaries attacking the information technology systems, network infrastructure, technology and facilities used to conduct its businesses. Cleco will continue to monitor developments affecting its employees, customers, and operations.
While the full impact on Cleco’s business from the continued COVID-19 pandemic is unknown at this time and difficult to predict, various aspects of its business could be adversely affected by COVID-19. While there are many unknowns as to the duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, it has caused significant volatility in global markets and has had an adverse impact on the operations of some of Cleco’s customers and suppliers, which could affect Cleco’s operations and its ability to access capital. The continued spread of COVID-19 and efforts to contain COVID-19, such as the imposition of additional quarantines or closures or reduced operations of businesses and other institutions, could result in an economic slowdown, which could adversely affect customer demand and consumption, cause delayed payments or uncollectible accounts, disrupt supply chains and markets,
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
cause potential delays in the timing of completion of capital projects, or cause other unpredictable events. These impacts could ultimately result in a downgrade of Cleco’s credit ratings.
Cleco cannot predict the duration or extent of the pandemic, the availability and timely distribution of effective treatments and vaccines, or other treatments for COVID-19, governmental responsive measures, or the extent of the effects or ultimate impacts on the global, national, or local economy, the capital markets, its suppliers, or customers. Any of the foregoing events or other unforeseen consequences of COVID-19 could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, or liquidity of the Registrants.
Transmission Constraints
Transmission constraints could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Energy prices in the MISO market are based on LMP, which includes a component directly related to congestion on the transmission system. Pricing zones with greater transmission congestion may have a higher LMP. Physical transmission constraints present in the MISO market could increase energy costs within Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun’s pricing zones or result in transmission curtailments. Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun are awarded and/or purchase FTR’s in auctions facilitated by MISO. However, insufficient FTR allocations or increased FTR costs due to negative congestion flows may result in an unexpected increase in energy costs to Cleco’s customers. For Cleco Power, if a disallowance of additional fuel costs associated with congestion is ordered by the LPSC resulting in a refund to Cleco Power’s customers, any such refund could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Cleco’s Generation, Transmission, and Distribution Facilities
Cleco’s generation facilities are susceptible to unplanned outages, significant maintenance requirements, and interruption of fuel deliveries.
The operation of power generation facilities involves many risks, including breakdown or failure of equipment, fuel supply interruption, and performance below expected levels of output or efficiency. Aging equipment, even if maintained in accordance with good engineering practices, may require significant expenditures to operate at peak efficiency, or to comply with environmental permits. Newer equipment can also be subject to unexpected failures. Accordingly, Cleco may incur more frequent unplanned outages, higher than anticipated operating and maintenance expenditures, higher replacement costs of purchased power, increased fuel costs, MISO related costs, and the loss of potential revenue related to competitive opportunities. The costs of such repairs, maintenance, and purchased power may not be fully recoverable in rates and could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Cleco’s generating facilities are fueled primarily by coal, natural gas, petroleum coke, and lignite. The deliverability of these fuel sources may be constrained due to such factors as higher demand, decreased regional supply, production shortages, weather-related disturbances, railroad constraints, waterway levels, labor strikes, or lack of transportation
capacity. If suppliers are unable to deliver the contracted volume of fuel and associated inventories are depleted, Cleco Power may be unable to operate generating units which may cause Cleco Power to operate at higher overall energy costs, which would increase the cost to customers. Cleco Power’s fuel and MISO-procured/settled energy expenses, which are recovered from its customers through the FAC, are subject to refund until either a prudency review or a periodic fuel audit is conducted by the LPSC.
Cleco Power could be indirectly liable for the impacts of other companies’ activities on lands that have been mined and reclaimed by Cleco Power. The liability for impacts on reclaimed lands may not be recoverable in rates and could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
The construction of, and capital improvements to, power generation and transmission and distribution facilities involve substantial risks. Should construction or capital improvement efforts be significantly more expensive than planned, the financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity of Cleco could be materially affected.
Cleco’s ability to complete construction of, or capital improvements to, power generation and transmission and distribution facilities in a timely manner and within budget is contingent upon many variables and subject to substantial risks. These variables include engineering and project execution risk and escalating costs for materials, labor, and environmental compliance. Delays in obtaining permits, shortages in materials and qualified labor, suppliers and contractors not performing as set forth under their contracts, changes in the scope and timing of projects, inaccurate cost estimates, the inability to raise capital on favorable terms, changes in commodity prices affecting revenue, fuel or material costs, changes in the economy, changes in laws or regulations, including environmental compliance requirements, and other events beyond the control of Cleco may materially affect the schedule and cost of these projects. If these projects are significantly delayed or become subject to cost overruns or cancellation, Cleco could incur additional costs including termination payments, face increased risk of potential write-off of the investment in the project, or Cleco Power may not be able to recover such costs in rates. Furthermore, failure to maintain various levels of generating unit availability or transmission and distribution reliability may result in various disallowances of Cleco Power’s investments.
Alternative Generation Technology
Changes in technology may have a material adverse effect on the value of Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun’s generating facilities.
A basic premise of Cleco’s business is that generating electricity at central power plants achieves economies of scale and produces electricity at a relatively low price. There are alternative technologies to produce electricity, most notably wind turbines, photovoltaic cells, and other solar generated power. Many companies and organizations conduct research and development activities to seek improvements in alternative technologies. As new technologies are developed and become available, the quantity and pattern of electricity purchased by customers could decline, with a corresponding decline in revenues derived by generating assets. To the extent Cleco is slow to adopt viable alternative generation
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
technologies, the value of Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun’s generating facilities could be reduced.
Litigation
Cleco is subject to litigation related to the 2016 Merger.
In connection with the 2016 Merger, four actions were filed in the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish, Louisiana and three actions were filed in the Civil District Court for Orleans Parish, Louisiana. See Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — 2016 Merger” for a discussion of these four actions.
It is possible that additional claims beyond those that have already been filed will be brought by the current plaintiffs or by others in an effort to seek monetary relief from Cleco’s former directors and officers. Cleco is not able to predict the outcome of these actions, or others, nor can Cleco predict the amount of time and expense that will be required to resolve the actions. In addition, the cost to Cleco of defending the actions, even if resolved in the defendants’ favor, could be substantial. Such actions could also divert the attention of Cleco’s management and resources from day-to-day operations.
Cleco Cajun
The success of Cleco Cajun depends, in part, on Cleco’s ability to manage the acquired business and realize anticipated benefits.
On February 4, 2019, Cleco acquired all of the membership interests of South Central Generating upon the closing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction. The success of the Cleco Cajun Transaction will depend, in part, on Cleco’s ability to manage and operate the unregulated business through service to electric cooperative customers and other wholesale customers. The majority of Cleco Cajun’s capacity is contracted to these customers through 2025. Failure to recontract these agreements or enter into new contracts to replace existing contracts could have a material adverse effect on Cleco Cajun’s results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
Failure to fully realize the anticipated benefits of the Cleco Cajun Transaction could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of Cleco.
Storm Restoration Costs
Cleco Power’s ability to recover costs resulting from Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta are subject to a prudency review and approval by the LPSC.
On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall in southwest Louisiana as a Category 4 storm causing catastrophic damage to portions of Cleco’s service territory and causing power outages for approximately 140,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and southwest Louisiana. Cleco Power sustained significant damage to its distribution and transmission facilities. Cleco Power’s total storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Laura is approximately $180.3 million. On October 9, 2020, Hurricane Delta made landfall in southwest Louisiana as a Category 2
storm resulting in power outages for approximately 132,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and south Louisiana. Cleco Power’s total storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Delta is approximately $50.7 million. On October 28, 2020, Hurricane Zeta made landfall in southeast Louisiana as a Category 2 storm resulting in power outages for approximately 73,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in southeast Louisiana. Cleco Power’s total storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Zeta is approximately $8.6 million. On December 4, 2020, Cleco Power filed an application with the LPSC requesting an interim rate recovery for return on the storm restoration costs associated with the hurricanes until such time securitization of such costs can be completed. Restoration costs incurred by Cleco Power from damages caused by Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta are subject to a prudency review by the LPSC. The LPSC has the authority to disallow costs found not to have been prudently incurred. Accordingly, Cleco Power may not be able to recover some of the restoration costs incurred, which could be material. Cleco Power will seek recovery of a portion of the restoration costs through the issuance of dedicated securitization bonds, which requires prior approval by the LPSC and would be repaid over time through a system restoration charge imposed on Cleco Power’s customers. The inability of Cleco Power’s customers to continue paying their utility bills or a decision by the LPSC to deny Cleco Power’s request to recover incurred restoration costs could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow of the Registrants.
Regulatory Compliance
Cleco operates in a highly regulated environment and adverse regulatory decisions or changes in applicable regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Registrants’ business or result in significant additional costs.
Cleco’s business is subject to extensive federal, state, and local energy, environmental, and other laws and regulations. Should Cleco be unsuccessful in obtaining necessary licenses or permits or should these regulatory authorities initiate any investigations or enforcement actions or impose penalties or disallowances on Cleco, Cleco’s business could be adversely affected. Existing regulations may be revised or reinterpreted and new laws and regulations may be adopted or become applicable to Cleco or Cleco’s facilities in a manner that may have a material adverse effect on the Registrants’ business or result in significant additional costs.
As a result of the 2016 Merger, Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power made the 2016 Merger Commitments to the LPSC including, but not limited to, the extension of Cleco Power’s current FRP for an additional two years, maintaining employee headcount, salaries, and benefits for ten years, and a limitation from incurring additional long-term debt, excluding non-recourse debt, unless certain financial ratios are achieved. Additionally, upon approval of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cleco made commitments to the LPSC including, but not limited to, holding Cleco Power retail customers harmless for any adverse impacts, increased costs of debt or equity, and credit rating downgrades attributable to the Cleco Cajun Transaction; the repayment of $400.0 million of Cleco Holdings’ debt by 2024; and a $4.0 million annual reduction to Cleco Power’s retail customer rates.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Cleco Power’s Rates
The LPSC and FERC regulate the retail rates and wholesale transmission tariffs, respectively, that Cleco Power can charge its customers.
Cleco Power’s ongoing financial viability depends on its ability to recover its costs in a timely manner from its LPSC-jurisdictional customers through LPSC-approved rates and its ability to recover its FERC-authorized revenue requirements from its FERC-jurisdictional wholesale transmission customers. Cleco Power’s financial viability also depends on its ability to recover in rates an adequate return on capital, including long-term debt and equity. If Cleco Power is unable to recover any material amount of its costs in rates in a timely manner or recover an adequate return on capital, the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants could be materially adversely affected. Recovery of these costs could result in rising utility bills threatening the affordability of such costs by Cleco Power’s customers in certain demographic areas, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Cleco Power’s revenues and earnings are substantially affected by regulatory proceedings known as rate cases or, in some cases, a request for extension of an FRP. During those cases, the LPSC determines Cleco Power’s rate base, depreciation rates, operation and maintenance costs, and administrative and general costs that Cleco Power may recover from its retail customers through its rates. In some instances, the outcome of a rate case or request for extension of an FRP may impact wholesale decisions of Cleco Power. These proceedings may examine, among other things, the prudence of Cleco Power’s operation and maintenance practices, level of subject expenditures, allowed rates of return, and previously incurred capital expenditures. The LPSC has the authority to disallow costs found not to have been prudently incurred. Rate cases generally have timelines of approximately one year, and decisions are typically subject to appeal, potentially leading to additional uncertainty. The transmission tariffs of Cleco Power are regulated by FERC with its own regulatory proceedings. Both the LPSC and FERC regulatory proceedings can involve multiple parties, including governmental bodies and officials, consumer advocacy groups, and various consumers of energy, all of whom have differing concerns but who have the common objective of just and reasonable rates.
Transmission rates that MISO transmission owners may collect are regulated by FERC. On November 21, 2019, FERC voted to adopt new methodology for evaluating base ROE for public utilities under the Federal Power Act. Cleco Power is unable to determine when a binding FERC order will be issued. Any reduction to the ROE component of the transmission rates could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Retail Electric Service
Cleco Power’s retail electric rates and business practices are regulated by the LPSC and reviews may result in refunds to customers.
Cleco Power’s retail rates for residential, commercial, and industrial customers and other retail sales are regulated by the LPSC. The LPSC will continue to conduct an annual review of Cleco Power’s earnings and regulatory ROE once its new rates
are effective. Cleco Power anticipates new rates to be effective in the first half of 2021. Cleco Power could be required to make a substantial refund of previously recorded revenue as a result of the LPSC review and such refund could result in a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
LPSC Audits
The LPSC conducts fuel audits that could result in Cleco Power making substantial refunds of previously recorded revenue.
Generally, Cleco Power’s cost of fuel used for electric generation and cost of purchased power are recovered through the LPSC-established FAC, which enables Cleco Power to pass on to its customers substantially all such charges. Recovery of FAC costs is subject to periodic fuel audits by the LPSC. The LPSC FAC General Order issued in November 1997, in Docket No. U-21497 provides that an audit will be performed at least every other year.
On March 31, 2020, Cleco Power received a notice of audit from the LPSC for the period of January 2018 to December 2019. The total amount of fuel expense included in the audit is $565.8 million. Cleco Power has responded to several sets of data requests from the LPSC. Cleco Power has FAC filings for January 2020 and thereafter that remain subject to audit. Management is unable to predict or give a reasonable estimate of the possible range of the disallowance, if any, related to these filings. If a disallowance of fuel costs is ordered resulting in a refund to Cleco Power’s customers, any such refund could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
The LPSC conducts audits of environmental costs that could result in Cleco Power making substantial refunds of previously recorded revenue.
In 2009, the LPSC issued Docket No. U-29380 Subdocket A, which provides Cleco Power an EAC to recover from customers certain costs of environmental compliance. The costs eligible for recovery are prudently incurred air emissions credits associated with complying with federal, state, and local air emission regulations that apply to the generation of electricity reduced by the sale of such allowances. Also eligible for recovery are variable emission mitigation costs, which are the costs of reagents such as ammonia and limestone that are a part of the fuel mix used to reduce air emissions, among other things. These expenses are eligible for recovery through Cleco Power’s EAC and subject to periodic review by the LPSC.
On March 3, 2020, Cleco Power received notice from the LPSC of the EAC audit for the period of January 2018 to December 2019. The total amount of environmental expense included in the audit is $26.2 million. Cleco Power has responded to several sets of data requests from the LPSC. Cleco Power has EAC filings for January 2020 and thereafter that remain subject to audit. Management is unable to predict or give a reasonable estimate of the possible range of the disallowance, if any, related to these filings. If a disallowance of environmental costs is ordered resulting in a refund to Cleco Power’s customers, any such refund could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
FERC Audit
FERC conducts audits that could result in Cleco Power making refunds of previously recorded revenue.
Generally, Cleco Power records wholesale transmission revenue through approved formula rates, Attachment O of the MISO tariff, and certain grandfathered agreements. The calculation of the rate formulas, as well as FERC accounting and reporting requirements, are subject to periodic audits by FERC. In March 2018, the Division of Audits and Accounting within the Office of Enforcement of FERC initiated an audit of Cleco Power for the period of January 1, 2014, through June 30, 2019. On September 27, 2019, Cleco Power received the final audit report, which indicated 12 findings of noncompliance with a combination of FERC accounting and reporting requirements and computation of revenue requirements along with 59 recommendations associated with the audit period. Cleco Power submitted a plan for implementing the audit recommendations on October 28, 2019. Cleco Power also submitted the refund analysis on November 7, 2019, which resulted in a refund related to the FERC audit findings, pending final assessment by the FERC Division of Audits and Accounting, which is expected in the third quarter of 2021. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $1.9 million recorded in Provision for rate refund on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets for the estimated refund. This amount is being refunded to Cleco Power’s wholesale transmission customers as a combination of refund payments and a reduction in Attachment O and grandfathered agreement rates over 12 months beginning June 1, 2020. Management is unable to predict the timing of future audits and whether or not the outcome of such future audits will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
MISO
MISO market operations could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, generation revenues, energy supply costs, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Cleco is a member of the MISO market region referred to as “MISO South,” which encompasses parts of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Dispatch of generation resources and generation volumes to the market is determined by MISO. Costs in the MISO South region are heavily influenced by commodity fuel prices, transmission congestion, dispatch of the generating assets owned not only by Cleco, but by all market participants in the MISO South region, and the overall demand and generation availability in the region.
MISO evaluates forced outage rates to assess generating unit capacity for planning reserve margins. If Cleco is subject to a significant amount of forced outages, Cleco may not possess sufficient planning reserves to serve its needs and could be forced to purchase capacity from the MISO resource adequacy auction. For Cleco Power, the costs of such capacity may not be recoverable in its rates and could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants. Using MISO’s unforced capacity method for determining generating unit capacity, Cleco Power’s fleet provided for 505 MW of capacity in excess of its peak, coincident to MISO’s peak, in 2020.
TCJA
Changes in taxation due to uncertain effects of the TCJA could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
The budget reconciliation act commonly referred to as the TCJA was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Proposed rulemakings issued by the IRS subsequent to the TCJA could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial conditions, or cash flows of the Registrants. The Registrants continue to assess the regulatory treatment of the TCJA, which could also have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
On July 10, 2019, the LPSC approved Cleco Power’s motion to address the rate redesign and the regulatory liability for excess ADIT, resulting from the enactment of the TCJA, in Cleco Power’s application for its next FRP, which was filed on June 28, 2019. Cleco Power anticipates new rates to be effective in the first half of 2021. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had a regulatory liability of $352.4 million for the portion of the net reduction to ADIT subject to regulatory treatment.
Reliability and CIP Standards Compliance
Cleco is subject to mandatory reliability and CIP standards. Fines and civil penalties are imposed on those who fail to comply with these standards.
NERC serves as the ERO with authority to establish and enforce mandatory reliability and CIP standards, subject to FERC approval, for users of the nation’s transmission system. FERC enforces compliance with these standards. New standards are being developed and existing standards are continuously being modified.
As these standards continue to be adopted and modified, they may impose additional compliance requirements on Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun separately, which may result in increased capital expenditures and operating expenses. Failure to comply with these standards can result in the imposition of material fines and civil penalties.
A NERC Reliability Standards audit is conducted every three years for Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun. The next NERC Reliability Standards audit for Cleco Power is scheduled to begin in 2023. The next NERC Reliability Standards audit for Cleco Cajun is scheduled to begin in 2022. A NERC CIP audit is also conducted every three years for Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun. Cleco Power’s current NERC CIP audit was completed on August 14, 2020, and the final report was issued by SERC on November 5, 2020. Cleco Cajun’s most recent CIP audit was completed in June 2019, and the final report was issued by SERC on June 27, 2019. Management is unable to determine the timing of NERC’s approval of the final reports.
Management is also unable to predict the final financial outcome of the most recent CIP audits, any future audits, or whether any findings will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Environmental Compliance
Cleco’s costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations are significant. The costs of compliance with new environmental laws and regulations, as well as the incurrence of incremental environmental liabilities, could be significant to the Registrants.
Cleco is subject to extensive environmental oversight by federal, state, and local authorities and is required to comply with numerous environmental laws and regulations related to air quality, water quality, waste management, natural resources, and health and safety. Cleco also is required to obtain and comply with numerous governmental permits in operating its facilities. Existing environmental laws, regulations, and permits could be revised or reinterpreted, and new laws and regulations could be adopted or become applicable to Cleco. As a result, some of Cleco’s EGUs could be rendered uneconomical to maintain or operate and could prompt early retirement of certain generation units. Any legal obligation that would require Cleco to substantially reduce its emissions beyond present levels could require extensive mitigation efforts and could raise uncertainty about the future viability of some fossil fuels as fuel for new and existing EGUs. Cleco will evaluate potential solutions to comply with such regulations and monitor rulemaking and any legal matters impacting the proposed regulations. Cleco may incur significant capital expenditures or additional operating costs to comply with such revisions, reinterpretations, and new requirements. If Cleco were to fail to comply, it could be subject to civil or criminal liabilities and fines or may be forced to shut down or reduce production from its facilities. Cleco cannot predict the timing or the outcome of pending or future legislative and rulemaking proposals.
Cleco Power may request from its customers recovery of its costs to comply with new environmental laws and regulations. If the LPSC were to deny Cleco Power’s request to recover all or part of its environmental compliance costs, there could be a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Wholesale Electric Service
Cleco’s business practices are regulated by FERC, and the wholesale rates of both Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun are subject to FERC’s triennial market power analysis. Cleco Power and/or Cleco Cajun could lose the right to sell wholesale generation at market-based rates.
FERC conducts a review of Cleco’s generation market power every three years in addition to each time generation capacity changes. Cleco filed its most recent triennial market power analysis on December 23, 2020. In the future, if FERC determines Cleco Power and/or Cleco Cajun possesses generation market power in excess of certain thresholds, Cleco Power and/or Cleco Cajun could lose the right to sell wholesale generation at market-based rates, which could result in a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Commodity Hedging and Commercial Transactions
Cleco may enter into fuel supply contracts, energy hedge transactions, and/or commercial transactions, including sales to wholesale customers and physical and financial hedges. If these transactions are not managed effectively, they may have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of the Registrants.
Cleco may enter into forward physical or financial fixed price or options for fuel, transmission, transportation, or capacity transactions and contracts. Cleco may also enter into physical or financial fixed price or options transactions to economically hedge exposure to commodity price risk of all or some of its customer supply agreements, natural gas, solid fuel requirements (coal), power, and other commodities, inclusive of transmission and transportation. Transactions are executed within board approved risk management guidelines, including transactions that qualify as derivatives contracts or hedge treatment in accordance with accounting guidance.
Some of these contracts are accounted for as derivatives, which requires the Registrants to record the fair value of the commitment on the balance sheet. For Cleco Power, the changes in fair value are deferred as a component of deferred fuel assets or liabilities in accordance with regulatory policy. At settlement, actual gains or losses are included in Cleco Power’s FAC. As previously stated, recovery of any of these FAC costs is subject to, and may be disallowed as part of, a prudency review or a periodic fuel audit conducted by the LPSC. For Cleco Cajun, the changes in fair value of all derivatives are reflected in current period earnings. As a result, Cleco is unable to accurately predict the effect that these transactions may have on its results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Commodity Prices
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun’s financial performance could be exposed to fluctuations in commodity prices and other factors, which could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Cleco Power
Cleco Power may enter into fuel cost hedging transactions to mitigate the volatility in fuel costs passed through to its retail customers. When transactions expire or are offset through liquidation, actual gains or losses are deferred and included in the FAC in the month the physical contract settles. Recovery of any of these FAC costs is subject to, and may be disallowed as part of, a prudency review or a periodic fuel audit conducted by the LPSC.
Cleco Cajun
Cleco Cajun is exposed to uncertain market prices of electricity, natural gas, coal, and other commodities that can impact costs of fuel supply for generation, generation revenue, cost to serve its contracted wholesale electricity customers, and revenue from these customers. Energy costs and revenues are also subject to volumetric risk due to fluctuations related to unexpected plant outages and uncertain customer load.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Counterparty Risk and Guarantees
Cleco may be required to provide credit support to its counterparties, which could have a material adverse effect on the Registrants’ liquidity.
Cleco may guarantee the performance of all or some of its commercial transaction obligations and may also be required to provide counterparty credit support in the form of cash or cash equivalent collateral or margins to secure all or part of those obligations. Downgrades in Cleco’s credit quality or changes in the market prices of transaction-related energy commodities could increase the collateral or margin required to be on deposit with the counterparty or clearing house. The required credit support or increase in credit support could have a material adverse effect on the Registrants’ liquidity.
Global Economic Environment and Uncertainty
Adverse capital market performance could result in reductions in the fair value of benefit plan assets and increase the Registrants’ liabilities related to such plans. Sustained declines in the fair value of the plan’s assets or sustained increases in plan liabilities could result in significant increases in funding requirements, which could adversely affect the Registrants’ liquidity and results of operations.
Performance of the capital markets affects the value of assets that are held in trust to satisfy future obligations under Cleco’s defined benefit pension plan. Sustained adverse market performance could result in lower rates of return for these assets than projected by Cleco and could increase Cleco’s funding requirements related to the pension plan. Additionally, changes in interest rates affect the present value of Cleco’s liabilities under the pension plan. Adverse changes in assumptions or adverse actual events could cause additional minimum contributions.
Cleco Credit Ratings
A downgrade in Cleco Holdings’ or Cleco Power’s credit ratings could result in an increase in their respective borrowing costs, a reduced pool of potential investors and funding sources, and a restriction on Cleco Power making distributions to Cleco Holdings.
Neither Cleco Holdings nor Cleco Power can assure that its current debt ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of its debt ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. If S&P, Moody’s, or Fitch were to downgrade Cleco Holdings’ or Cleco Power’s long-term ratings, particularly below investment grade, the value of their debt securities would be adversely affected. Downgrades of either Cleco Holdings’ or Cleco Power’s credit ratings could result in additional fees and higher interest rates for borrowings under their respective credit facilities. In addition, Cleco Holdings or Cleco Power, as the case may be, would likely be required to pay higher interest rates in future debt financings, may be subject to more onerous debt covenants, and their pool of potential investors and funding sources could decrease. In addition, the 2016 Merger Commitments provide for limitations on the amount of distributions that may be paid from Cleco Power to Cleco Holdings, depending on Cleco Power’s common equity ratio and its corporate credit/issuer ratings. As a result, Cleco Power may be prohibited from making distributions to Cleco Holdings in the event of a ratings downgrade below investment grade.
Cleco Power LLC’s Unsecured and Unsubordinated Obligations
Cleco Power LLC’s unsecured and unsubordinated obligations, including, without limitation, its senior notes, will be effectively subordinated to any secured debt of Cleco Power LLC and structurally subordinated to indebtedness and other liabilities and preferred equity of any of Cleco Power LLC’s subsidiaries.
Some of Cleco Power LLC’s senior notes and its obligations under various loan agreements and refunding agreements with the Rapides Finance Authority, the Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, and other issuers of tax-exempt bonds for the benefit of Cleco Power LLC are unsecured and rank equally with all of Cleco Power LLC’s existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power LLC had an aggregate of $1.49 billion of unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness net of debt discount and debt expense. The unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Cleco Power LLC will be effectively subordinated to, and thus have a junior position to, any secured debt that Cleco Power LLC may have outstanding from time to time (including any mortgage bonds) with respect to the assets securing such debt. Certain agreements entered into by Cleco Power LLC with other lenders that are unsecured provide that if Cleco Power LLC issues secured debt, Cleco Power LLC is obligated to grant these lenders the same security interest in certain assets of Cleco Power LLC. If such a security interest were to arise, it would further subordinate Cleco Power LLC’s unsecured and unsubordinated obligations.
As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power LLC had no secured indebtedness outstanding. Cleco Power LLC may issue mortgage bonds in the future under any future Indenture of Mortgage, and holders of mortgage bonds would have a prior claim on certain Cleco Power LLC material assets upon dissolution, winding up, liquidation, or reorganization. Additionally, Cleco Power LLC’s ability (and the ability of Cleco Power LLC’s creditors, including holders of its senior notes) to participate in the assets of Cleco Power LLC’s subsidiary, Cleco Katrina/Rita, is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors. As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Katrina/Rita had no indebtedness outstanding.
Presidential Administration
The new Presidential administration may make substantial changes to environmental, fiscal, and tax policies that could have a material adverse effect on the Registrants’ business.
The new Presidential administration may call for substantial changes to environmental, fiscal, and tax policies, which may include comprehensive tax reform, more stringent requirements for reducing GHG emissions and other air pollutants from existing fossil fuel-fired power plants, and other objectives that may impact the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants. Shortly after taking office in January 2021, the new President issued a series of executive orders designed to address climate change and GHG emissions, as well as an executive order requiring agencies to review past environmental actions. The new Presidential administration has also issued a memorandum to departments and agencies to refrain from proposing or issuing rules until a departmental or agency head appointed or
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
designated by the administration has reviewed and approved the rule. The new executive orders may result in the development of additional regulations or changes to existing regulations and it is possible that these changes could adversely affect Cleco’s business. Until any such changes are enacted, management is unable to determine the impact of any such changes on the Registrants’ business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Insurance
Cleco’s insurance coverage may not be sufficient.
Cleco currently has property, casualty, cybersecurity, and liability insurance policies in place to protect its employees, directors, and assets in amounts that it considers appropriate. Such policies are subject to certain limits and deductibles. Insurance coverage may not be available in the future at current costs, on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and the insurance proceeds received for any loss of, or any damage to, any of Cleco’s facilities may not be sufficient to restore the loss or damage without a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Like other utilities that serve coastal regions, Cleco Power does not have insurance covering its transmission and distribution system, other than substations, because it believes such insurance to be cost prohibitive. In the future, Cleco Power may not be able to recover the costs incurred in restoring transmission and distribution properties following hurricanes or other natural disasters through issuance of storm recovery bonds or a change in Cleco Power’s regulated rates or otherwise, or any such recovery may not be timely granted. Therefore, Cleco Power may not be able to restore any loss of, or damage to, any of its transmission and distribution properties without a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Litigation
The outcome of legal proceedings cannot be predicted. An adverse finding could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
The Registrants are party to various litigation matters arising out of the ordinary operations of their business. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot presently be determined, nor, in many cases, can the liability that could potentially result from a negative outcome in each case presently be reasonably estimated. The liability that the Registrants may ultimately incur with respect to any of these cases in the event of a negative outcome may be in excess of amounts currently reserved and insured against with respect to such matters and, as a result, these matters may have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Counterparty Risk and Guarantees
Cleco is exposed to the risk that counterparties may not meet their performance obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on the operating and financial performance of the Registrants.
Counterparties may fail to perform on their physical or financial obligations. Currently, Cleco has industry accepted master agreements in place with counterparties that provide credit
default language. Some master agreements with counterparties contain provisions that require the counterparties to provide credit support to secure all or part of their obligations to Cleco. If the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, Cleco may enforce and recover the proceeds from the credit support provided; however, in the event of a default, credit support may not always be adequate to cover the related obligations. In such event, Cleco may incur losses in excess of amounts already paid, if any, to the counterparties or due to an adverse replacement cost of the transaction.
The credit commitments of Cleco’s lenders under its bank facilities may not be honored for a variety of reasons, including unexpected periods of financial distress affecting such lenders, which could materially affect the adequacy of its liquidity sources. In no case would Cleco Power bear any commodity or credit risk of Cleco Cajun.
Global Economic Uncertainty and Access to Capital
Changes in the method of determining LIBOR, or the replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate, may adversely affect interest expense related to outstanding debt.
Amounts drawn under certain of Cleco’s current debt agreements, including its revolving credit facilities, bear interest at rates based on LIBOR. On July 27, 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom announced that it would phase out LIBOR as a benchmark by the end of 2021. On November 30, 2020, the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom and the ICE Benchmark Administration, which administers LIBOR quotations, announced a consultation on the extension of the quotation of most LIBOR tenors to June 30, 2023, for legacy contracts only. Cleco’s revolving credit facilities and term loans incorporate mechanisms to amend the debt agreements to accommodate the eventual establishment of an alternate rate of interest, including alternative benchmark rates such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), upon the occurrence of certain events related to the phase-out of any applicable interest rate. The overall financial markets may be disrupted as a result of the phase-out or replacement of LIBOR. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential phase-out and alternative reference rates or disruption in the financial market could have a material adverse effect on the Registrants’ financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or liquidity.
Disruptions in the capital and credit markets may adversely affect the Registrants’ cost of capital and ability to meet liquidity needs or access capital to operate and grow the business.
The Registrants’ business is capital intensive and dependent upon the Registrants’ respective abilities to access capital at reasonable rates and other terms. The Registrants’ liquidity needs could significantly increase in the event of a hurricane or other weather-related or unforeseen disaster or when there are spikes in the price for natural gas and other commodities. The occurrence of one or more contingencies, including a delay in regulatory recovery of fuel, purchased power, or storm restoration costs; higher than expected required pension contributions; an acceleration of payments or decreased credit lines; less cash flow from operations than expected; or other unexpected events, could cause the financing needs of the Registrants to increase materially.
Events beyond the Registrants’ control, such as political uncertainty in the U.S. (including the ongoing debates related
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
to the U.S. federal government budget), as well as volatility and disruption in global capital and credit markets, may create uncertainty that could increase their cost of capital or impair their ability to access the capital markets, including the ability to draw on their respective bank credit facilities. Additionally, upon approval of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cleco made commitments to the LPSC including, but not limited to, holding Cleco Power retail customers harmless for any adverse impacts, increased costs of debt or equity, and credit rating downgrades attributable to the Cleco Cajun Transaction; the repayment of $400.0 million of Cleco Holdings’ debt by 2024; and a $4.0 million annual reduction to Cleco Power’s retail customer rates. The Registrants may be unable to predict the degree of success they will have in renewing or replacing their respective credit facilities as they come up for renewal. Moreover, the size, terms, and covenants of any new credit facilities may not be comparable to, and may be more restrictive than, existing facilities. If the Registrants are unable to access the credit and capital markets on terms that are reasonable, they may have to delay raising capital, issue shorter-term securities, and/or bear an unfavorable cost of capital, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on
the Registrants’ ability to fund capital expenditures or to service debt, or on the Registrants’ flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions.
Taxes
Changes in taxation as well as the inherent difficulty in quantifying potential tax effects of business decisions could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
The Registrants make judgments regarding the utilization of existing income tax credits and the potential tax effects of various financial transactions and results of operations to estimate their obligations to taxing authorities. Tax obligations include income, franchise, property, sales and use, and employment-related taxes. These judgments may include reserves for potential adverse outcomes regarding tax positions that have been taken. Changes in federal, state, or local tax laws, adverse tax audit results, or adverse tax rulings on positions taken by the Registrants could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
All of Cleco Power’s electric generating stations and electric operating properties are located in Louisiana. Cleco Power considers all of its properties to be well maintained, in good operating condition, and suitable for their intended purposes. For more information on Cleco Power’s generating facilities, see Item 1, “Business — Operations — Cleco Power.”
Electric Generating Stations
As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power either owned or had an ownership interest in six steam electric generating stations, three combined cycle units, and one gas turbine with a combined rated capacity of 3,360 MW, and a combined electric net generating capacity of 3,186 MW. The net generating capacity is the result of capacity tests and operational tests performed during 2020, as required by MISO. This amount reflects the maximum production capacity these units can sustain over a specified period of time. For more information on Cleco Power’s generating facilities, see Item 1, “Business — Operations — Cleco Power.”
Electric Substations
As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power owned 89 active transmission substations and 249 active distribution substations.
Electric Lines
As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power’s transmission system consisted of 67 circuit miles of 500-kiloVolt (kV) lines; 561 circuit miles of 230-kV lines; 678 circuit miles of 138 kV lines; and 29 circuit miles of 69-kV lines. Cleco Power’s distribution system consisted of 3,405 circuit miles of 34.5-kV lines and 8,747 circuit miles of other lines.
General Properties
Cleco Power owns various properties throughout Louisiana, which include a headquarters office building, regional offices, service centers, telecommunications equipment, and other general-purpose facilities.
Title
Cleco Power’s electric generating plants and certain other principal properties are owned in fee simple. Electric transmission and distribution lines are located either on private rights-of-way or along streets or highways by public consent.
Substantially all of Cleco Power’s property, plant, and equipment are subject to a lien under Cleco Power’s Indenture of Mortgage, which does not impair the use of such properties in the operation of its business. As of December 31, 2020, no mortgage bonds were outstanding under the Indenture of Mortgage. Some of the unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Cleco Power will be effectively subordinated to, and thus have a junior position to, any mortgage bonds that Cleco Power may have outstanding from time to time with respect to the assets subject to the lien of the Indenture of Mortgage. Cleco Power may issue mortgage bonds in the future under its Indenture of Mortgage, and holders of mortgage bonds would have a prior claim on certain Cleco Power material assets upon dissolution, winding up, liquidation, or reorganization.
Cleco Cajun has electric generating stations and electric operating properties located in Louisiana and Texas. Cleco Cajun considers all of its properties to be well maintained, in good operating condition, and suitable for their intended
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
purposes. For more information on Cleco Cajun’s generating facilities, see Item 1, “Business — Operations — Cleco Cajun.
”
Electric Generating Stations
As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Cajun has ownership interest in 4 electric generating stations which, combined, consist of 5 gas turbine units and 5 steam electric generating units located in Louisiana as well as 4 combined cycle units located in Texas. These generating facilities have a combined rated capacity of 3,379 MW. For more information on Cleco Cajun’s generating facilities, see Item 1, “Business — Operations — Cleco Cajun.”
General Properties
Cleco Cajun owns various properties throughout Louisiana, which include a regional office, telecommunications equipment, and other general-purpose assets.
Title
Cleco Cajun’s assets are owned in fee simple and are not subject to non-ordinary course of business liens or encumbrances.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
For information on legal proceedings affecting Cleco, see Item 1, “Business — Environmental Matters — Air Quality,” Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — Litigation,” and Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation.”
For information on legal proceedings affecting Cleco Power, see Item 1, “Business — Environmental Matters — Air Quality” and Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS’ COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
There is no established public trading market for Cleco Holdings’ membership interests. All of Cleco Holdings’ outstanding membership interests are owned by Cleco Group.
Cleco Holdings’ credit facility requires a total indebtedness of less than or equal to 65% of total capitalization in order to declare dividend payments. Additionally, in accordance with the 2016 Merger Commitments, Cleco Holdings is subjected to certain provisions limiting the amount of distributions that may be paid from Cleco Holdings to Cleco Group or Cleco Partners, depending on Cleco Holdings’ debt to EBITDA ratio and its corporate credit ratings.
Cleco Holdings made no distributions to Cleco Group during 2020 and 2019. In 2018, Cleco Holdings made $71.4 million of distribution payments to Cleco Group.
Cleco Holdings received no equity contributions from Cleco Group during 2020 and 2018. In 2019, Cleco Holdings received $384.9 million of equity contributions from Cleco Group.
There is no market for Cleco Power’s membership interests. All of Cleco Power’s outstanding membership interests are owned by Cleco Holdings. Distributions on Cleco Power’s membership interests are paid when and if declared by Cleco Power’s Board of Managers. Any future distributions also may be restricted by any credit or loan agreements into which Cleco Power may enter.
Some provisions in Cleco Power’s debt instruments restrict the amount of equity available for distribution to Cleco Holdings by Cleco Power by requiring Cleco Power’s total indebtedness to be less than or equal to 65% of total capitalization. In addition, the 2016 Merger Commitments provide for limitations on the amount of distributions that may be paid from Cleco Power to Cleco Holdings, depending on Cleco Power’s common equity ratio and its corporate credit ratings.
Cleco Power made no distributions to Cleco Holdings in 2020. Cleco Power made $20.0 million and $121.4 million of distributions to Cleco Holdings during 2019, and 2018, respectively.
Cleco Power received no equity contributions from Cleco Holdings in 2020, 2019, and 2018.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The information set forth in the following table should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Five-Year Selected Financial Data | | | | | | | | | | | |
| SUCCESSOR | | PREDECESSOR |
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND PERCENTAGES) | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2020 | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2019 | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2018 | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2017 | | APR. 13, 2016 - DEC. 31, 2016 | | JAN. 1, 2016 - APR. 12, 2016 |
Operating revenue, net (excluding intercompany revenue) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | 1,020,674 | | | $ | 1,157,774 | | | $ | 1,240,722 | | | $ | 1,184,345 | | | $ | 859,006 | | | $ | 299,283 | |
Cleco Cajun | 487,149 | | | 491,510 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Other | (9,677) | | | (9,679) | | | (9,678) | | | (8,699) | | | (6,001) | | | 587 | |
Total | $ | 1,498,146 | | | $ | 1,639,605 | | | $ | 1,231,044 | | | $ | 1,175,646 | | | $ | 853,005 | | | $ | 299,870 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | 158,018 | | | $ | 195,830 | | | $ | 123,819 | | | $ | 145,159 | | | $ | (46,935) | | | $ | (492) | |
Net income (loss) | 122,300 | | | $ | 152,665 | | | $ | 94,437 | | | $ | 138,080 | | | $ | (24,113) | | | $ | (3,960) | |
Capitalization | | | | | | | | | | | |
Member’s equity | 46.55 | % | | 46.31 | % | | 42.50 | % | | 42.50 | % | | 42.77 | % | | |
Long-term debt and finance leases (1) | 53.45 | % | | 53.69 | % | | 57.50 | % | | 57.50 | % | | 57.23 | % | | |
Member’s equity | 2,757,023 | | | $ | 2,643,006 | | | $ | 2,124,740 | | | $ | 2,096,357 | | | $ | 2,046,764 | | | |
Long-term debt and finance leases (1) | 3,165,387 | | | $ | 3,064,679 | | | $ | 2,874,485 | | | $ | 2,836,105 | | | $ | 2,738,571 | | | |
Total assets | 7,725,569 | | | $ | 7,476,298 | | | $ | 6,436,814 | | | $ | 6,278,382 | | | $ | 6,343,144 | | | |
Cash dividends declared per common share | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | | $ | 0.40 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Excludes long-term debt and finance leases due within one year. There were no finance lease obligations at December 31, 2017.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion is intended to assist in understanding Cleco’s results of operations and Cleco’s present financial condition. Cleco’s historical consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain additional information that should be referred to when reviewing this material.
Cleco uses its website, https://www.cleco.com, as a routine channel for distribution of important information, including news releases and financial information. Cleco’s website is the primary source of publicly disclosed news about Cleco. Cleco is providing the address to its website solely for informational purposes and does not intend for the address to be an active link. The contents of the website are not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Cleco is a regional energy company that conducts substantially all of its business operations through its two principal operating business segments:
•Cleco Power, a regulated electric utility company that owns 10 generating units with a total rated capacity of 3,360 MW and serves approximately 290,000 customers in Louisiana through its retail business and supplies wholesale power in Louisiana and Mississippi; and
•Cleco Cajun, an unregulated electric utility company that owns 14 generating units with a total rated capacity of 3,379 MW and wholesale contracts serving nine Louisiana cooperatives, three wholesale municipal customers, and one electric utility. Upon the closing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cottonwood Energy entered into the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback.
Significant Events
Winter Storms Uri and Viola
In February 2021, Cleco’s service territory experienced extreme and unprecedented winter weather that resulted in damage to Cleco Power’s distribution and transmission assets, electricity generation supply shortages, natural gas supply shortages and increased wholesale prices of natural gas in the United States, primarily due to prolonged freezing temperatures.
On February 14, 2021, Winter Storm Uri reached Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 11,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in south Louisiana. By February 17, 2021, power was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power. On February 17, 2021, Winter Storm Viola reached Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 43,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and south Louisiana. By February 22, 2021, power was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power. Cleco Power’s current estimate of the total storm restoration costs related to Winter Storms Uri and Viola is between $9.0 million and $10.0 million. Cleco Power continues its restoration efforts as damage to its distribution and transmission assets is still being assessed. Cleco Power anticipates the establishment of a regulatory asset for non-capital expenses incurred related to Winter Storms Uri and Viola, subject to LPSC approval.
On February 16, 2021, Cleco was notified by the regional reliability coordinator, MISO, that extremely cold temperatures were causing an increase in demand for power, which resulted in an overload of the power grid. The electricity generation shortages necessitated MISO to implement controlled outages in certain of its service areas. To help protect the stability of the power grid and prevent prolonged outages, MISO instructed Cleco to reduce demand on the power grid by initiating periodic outages to customers across Louisiana. The periodic power outages were minimal and suspended within one hour of initiation at the direction of MISO because the power shortage was no longer threatening the reliability of the power grid.
Cleco Power’s current estimate of incremental fuel and purchased power costs incurred as a result of Winter Storms Uri and Viola is between $45.0 million and $55.0 million. As a result of the increase in net purchased power costs exceeding its unsecured credit capacity with MISO, on February 24, 2021, Cleco Power posted collateral in the amount of $21.0 million with MISO. Cleco Power expects to settle the majority of its purchased power obligations with MISO associated with the winter storms and eliminate associated collateral postings by March 9, 2021. The amount of incremental fuel and purchased power costs are preliminary estimates and subject to final settlement. Management expects to seek recovery of these costs through Cleco Power’s FAC.
Cleco Cajun currently estimates the incremental negative impact of Winter Storms Uri and Viola on operations to be between $10.0 million and $15.0 million. As a result of the increase in net purchased power costs exceeding its unsecured credit capacity with MISO, on February 24, 2021, Cleco Cajun posted collateral in the amount of $5.0 million with MISO. Cleco Cajun expects to settle the majority of its power purchase obligations with MISO associated with the winter storms and eliminate associated collateral postings by March 9, 2021. The incremental impact to Cleco Cajun’s operations is a preliminary estimate and subject to final settlement.
Management is still assessing the expected impact that these winter storms and related events will have on the Registrants’ financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or liquidity.
Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta
In August and October 2020, Cleco’s service territories were impacted by three separate hurricanes. While the hurricanes did not have a material impact on Cleco Cajun, Cleco Power’s distribution and transmission systems sustained substantial damage.
On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall in southwest Louisiana as a Category 4 storm, causing catastrophic damage to portions of Cleco Power’s service territory and causing power outages for approximately 140,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and southwest Louisiana. By September 18, 2020, power was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power.
On October 9, 2020, Hurricane Delta made landfall in southwest Louisiana as a Category 2 storm resulting in power outages for approximately 132,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and south Louisiana. By October 16, 2020, service was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
On October 28, 2020, Hurricane Zeta made landfall in southeast Louisiana as a Category 2 storm resulting in power outages for approximately 73,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in southeast Louisiana. By October 31, 2020, service was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power recognized regulatory assets for non-capital expenses related to Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta, as allowed by the LPSC, totaling $75.0 million. On December 4, 2020, Cleco Power made a filing with the LPSC requesting interim rate recovery for return on certain storm restoration costs associated with the hurricanes until such time securitization of such costs can be completed. Although Cleco Power believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its current obligations and to fund Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta restoration efforts from a combination of cash on hand and available capacity under its revolving credit facilities, Cleco Power is exploring options to supplement its liquidity until such time securitization of such costs can be completed. For more information on Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta and the regulatory asset for non-capital storm expenses, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 6 — Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — Deferred Storm Restoration Costs” and “Note 19 — Storm Restoration — Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta.”
COVID-19
On March 11, 2020, WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak to be a global pandemic, and on March 13, 2020, the U.S. declared a national emergency. In response to these declarations and the rapid spread of COVID-19, federal, state and local governments imposed varying degrees of restrictions on business and social activities to contain COVID-19, including quarantine and “stay-at-home” orders and directives in Cleco’s service territory. These restrictions have significantly impacted many sectors of the economy with record levels of unemployment driven by businesses, nonprofit organizations, and governmental entities modifying, curtailing, or ceasing normal operations. State and local authorities have also implemented multistep policies with the goal of reopening various sectors of the economy such as retail establishments, health and personal care businesses, and restaurants, among others. However, certain jurisdictions have begun reopening only to delay these plans or return to restrictions in the face of increases in new COVID-19 cases. For example, the governor of the state of Louisiana issued orders in May 2020 to allow businesses to reopen at varying levels of capacity in May and June 2020. To address the June 2020 spike in COVID-19 cases, such reopening activities were temporarily paused or scaled back, and also included closing certain establishments. These restrictions resulted in a decline in new COVID-19 cases, and in September 2020, the state of Louisiana entered into the next phase of its multistep reopening plan. However, in the fall of 2020, new COVID-19 cases began to rise once again and in November 2020, the governor of the state of Louisiana issued orders reverting back to the previous phase of its multistep reopening plan, requiring businesses to temporarily pause or scale back their reopening activities. These increased restrictions again were successful in slowing the spread of COVID-19; therefore, effective March 3, 2021, the state of Louisiana reentered into the next phase of its multistep reopening plan, reducing some of the restrictions that were in effect.
The first priority in Cleco’s response to this crisis has been the health and safety of its employees and those of its customers and other business counterparties. Cleco has implemented preventative measures and developed corporate response plans to minimize unnecessary risk of exposure and prevent infection, while supporting its customers’ operations to the best of its ability in current circumstances. Cleco has an Emergency (Crisis) Response Team for health, safety, and environmental matters and personnel issues, and has established a Pandemic Plan Team to address various impacts of COVID-19 as they have been developing. This team provides leadership and guidance for planning, risk management, and any policy changes. The team ensures that Cleco plans, manages, and safely executes the pandemic plan set forth by management. In addition, Cleco has assessed and updated its existing business continuity plans for its business units in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The implementation of these modifications, and taking the stated precautionary measures, has resulted in the COVID-19 pandemic having a low impact to the Cleco workforce, allowing Cleco to continue providing reliable service to its customers.
Beginning on March 13, 2020, and as a result of an LPSC executive order, Cleco Power suspended the assessment of late fees, disconnections, and the utilization of collection agencies to help customers facing financial challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic. On July 1, 2020, the LPSC issued an order ending the moratorium on disconnections effective July 16, 2020. Cleco resumed disconnections and late fees beginning October 1, 2020. On July 16, 2020, Cleco began setting up interest-free payment plan arrangements for customers with past due balances to be repaid over a period of up to 18 months. On December 4, 2020, Cleco Power made a filing with the LPSC requesting the recovery of the regulatory asset as well as the lost revenue associated with the disconnect fees and incremental costs. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had a regulatory asset of $3.0 million for expenses incurred. For more information on the regulatory asset related to the COVID-19 pandemic, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 6 — Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — COVID-19 Executive Order.”
Cleco is also working with its suppliers to understand the potential impacts to its supply chain. Cleco will continue to monitor developments affecting its workforce, customers, and suppliers and take additional precautions as Cleco deems warranted.
Cleco has implemented certain measures that it believes will provide financial flexibility and help maintain its liquidity. On March 23, 2020, Cleco Holdings made an $88.0 million draw on its revolving credit facility, and Cleco Power made a $150.0 million draw on its revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2020, there was no balance outstanding on Cleco Holdings’ revolving credit facility and $75.0 million outstanding on Cleco Power’s revolving credit facility. While Cleco continues to assess the COVID-19 situation, Cleco cannot predict the full impact that COVID-19 or the significant disruption and volatility currently being experienced in the markets will have on its business, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations. For additional discussion regarding certain risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — COVID-19.”
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Cleco Cajun
Upon completion of the Cleco Cajun Transaction on February 4, 2019, Cleco Cajun became a reportable segment and is reflected as such in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For more information on the Cleco Cajun Transaction, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 3 — Business Combinations.” Cleco’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, include the financial results of Cleco Cajun from the closing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction on February 4, 2019, until December 31, 2019.
Cleco Cajun has 13 power purchase agreements totaling nearly 2,200 MW with a mixture of cooperatives, municipal bodies, and a utility. Collectively, 95% of Cleco Cajun’s capacity is contracted through April 2025, and Cleco Cajun routinely seeks to grow the amount of power sold pursuant to these existing agreements. These contracts provide Cleco Cajun with predictable cash flow and market risk mitigation through at least 2025, but may prevent Cleco Cajun from taking advantage of rising market rates for power. Failure to recontract these agreements could have a material adverse effect on Cleco Cajun’s results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
In December 2020, Cleco Cajun retired the 176-MW Sterlington generating facility located in Sterlington, Louisiana. As the facility had reached the end of its useful life, Cleco Cajun determined that it would be more cost effective to retire the Sterlington generating facility than it would be to make the necessary improvements to continue its operation.
Many factors affect Cleco Cajun’s primary business of providing wholesale power and capacity. These factors include weather, the market price of power, the sales volume of power through existing contracts, the ability to comply with increasingly stringent environmental standards, and compliance with the commitments made to the LPSC as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction.
Cleco Power
Many factors affect Cleco Power’s primary business of generating, delivering, and selling electricity. These factors include weather and the presence of a stable regulatory environment, which impacts the ROE and the current rate case, as well as the recovery of costs related to storms, growing energy demand, and rising fuel prices; the ability to increase energy sales while containing costs; the ability to reliably deliver power to its jurisdictional customers; the ability to comply with increasingly stringent regulatory and environmental standards; and the ability to successfully perform in MISO while subject to the related operating challenges and uncertainties, including increased wholesale competition. Cleco Power’s current key initiatives are continuing construction on the Bayou Vista to Segura Transmission project; continuing the DSMART project; and maintaining and growing its wholesale and retail business. These and other initiatives are discussed below.
Bayou Vista to Segura Transmission Project
The Bayou Vista to Segura Transmission project includes the construction of 48 miles of 230kV transmission line, a 230/138kV substation, and three substation expansions in south Louisiana. The project is expected to cost approximately $125.0 million. The project is expected to increase reliability, provide transmission system redundancy, and provide hurricane hardening for customers in south Louisiana. Cleco
Power received MISO approval for the project in December 2017. Construction was completed on expansions to existing substations. The northern phase is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2021, and the southern phase is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2021. As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had spent $49.3 million on the project.
DSMART Project
The DSMART project includes modernization of Cleco Power’s distribution system by replacing or upgrading distribution line equipment utilizing new and emerging technologies to facilitate automatic fault isolation, service restoration, and fault location. The project is expected to provide savings through a reduction in outage restoration time, time to locate faults, and improved operational efficiencies. The project is also expected to improve safety and reliability of Cleco Power’s distribution assets by minimizing outage patrols and improving situational awareness in the distribution operations center. The total estimated project cost is $90.2 million. The project implementation will be completed in phases and management expects the total project will be completed by the end of 2025. In January 2019, Cleco Power began the first phase of the project. As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had spent $14.6 million on the project.
Other
Cleco Power is working to secure load growth opportunities that include renewing existing franchises and wholesale contracts, pursuing new wholesale contracts and franchises, and adding new retail load opportunities with large industrial, commercial, and residential load. The retail opportunities include sectors such as agriculture, oil and gas, chemicals, metals, national accounts, government and military, wood and paper, health care, information technology, transportation, and other manufacturing.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2020, and 2019
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | | FAVORABLE/(UNFAVORABLE) |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | VARIANCE | | CHANGE |
Operating revenue, net | $ | 1,498,146 | | | $ | 1,639,605 | | | $ | (141,459) | | | (8.6) | % |
Operating expenses | 1,193,054 | | | 1,324,711 | | | 131,657 | | | 9.9 | % |
Operating income | 305,092 | | | 314,894 | | | (9,802) | | | (3.1) | % |
Interest income | 3,948 | | | 6,090 | | | (2,142) | | | (35.2) | % |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 998 | | | 15,397 | | | (14,399) | | | (93.5) | % |
Other (expense) income, net | (14,156) | | | 758 | | | (14,914) | | | * |
Interest charges | 137,864 | | | 141,309 | | | 3,445 | | | 2.4 | % |
Federal and state income tax expense | 35,718 | | | 43,165 | | | 7,447 | | | 17.3 | % |
Net income | $ | 122,300 | | | $ | 152,665 | | | $ | (30,365) | | | (19.9) | % |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
* Not meaningful |
Significant factors affecting Cleco’s net income during the year ended December 31, 2020, are described below.
COVID-19 Impacts
The rapid spread of COVID-19 and the varying degrees of restrictions on business and social activities imposed by federal, state, and local governments to contain COVID-19, including quarantine and “stay-at-home” orders and directives in Cleco’s service territory, have caused Cleco to experience increasingly adverse business conditions. These directives include an executive order issued on March 13, 2020, by the LPSC prohibiting the disconnection of utilities for nonpayment. The LPSC is allowing utilities to establish a regulatory asset for the expenses incurred from the executive order. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had a regulatory asset of $3.0 million for expenses incurred. While Cleco continues to assess the COVID-19 situation, at this time Cleco cannot estimate with any degree of certainty the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its financial condition and future results of operations, although Cleco expects the COVID-19 situation to adversely impact future quarters. For additional discussion regarding certain risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — COVID-19.” For more information on the regulatory asset related to the COVID-19 pandemic, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 6 — Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — COVID-19 Executive Order.”
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue, net decreased $141.5 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $101.2 million of lower fuel cost recovery at Cleco Power. Also contributing to the decrease was $14.7 million of lower base revenue, $14.6 million of higher electric customer credits, and $7.6 million of lower other operations revenue at Cleco Power. For more information on the factors affecting operating revenue, see “— Cleco Power — Base,” “— Fuel Cost Recover/Recoverable Fuel and Purchased Power,” “— Electric Customer Credits,” and “— Other Operations Revenue.”
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses decreased $131.7 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $101.2 million of lower recoverable fuel and purchased power expenses at Cleco Power. Also contributing to the decrease was $48.1 million of lower fuel used for electric generation at Cleco Cajun. For more information on the factors affecting operating expenses at Cleco Power, see “— Cleco Power — Fuel Cost Recover/Recoverable Fuel and Purchased Power,” “— Other Operations and Maintenance Expense,” and “— Depreciation and Amortization.” For more information on the factors affecting operating expenses at Cleco Cajun, see “— Cleco Cajun — Fuel Used for Electric Generation,” “— Purchased Power,” “— Depreciation and Amortization,” and “— Taxes Other Than Income Taxes.”
Interest Income
Interest income decreased $2.1 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $1.5 million of lower interest rates and balances on temporary investment at Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun. Also contributing to the decrease was $0.7 million of lower interest related to a fuel surcharge at Cleco Power.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
Allowance for equity funds used during construction decreased $14.4 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $10.7 million of lower construction costs related to various Cleco Power projects. Also contributing to the decrease was $3.7 million of lower AFUDC rates driven by the impact of Cleco Power’s short-term debt borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit facility.
Other (Expense) Income, Net
Other (expense) income, net increased $14.9 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $9.4 million of higher retirement benefit related non-service costs. Also contributing to the increase was $5.5 million for the change in value of life insurance policies as a result of less favorable market conditions at Cleco Holdings.
Interest Charges
Interest charges decreased $3.4 million during 2020 as compared to 2019. Lower rates on Cleco Holdings’ variable rate debt contributed $12.2 million to the decrease. Also contributing to the decrease was $2.7 million of lower interest accrued on a tax rate refund at Cleco Power. Partially offsetting these decreases were $6.9 million of higher interest associated with Cleco Holdings’ senior notes issued in September 2019 and $4.6 million of lower allowance for borrowed funds used during construction at Cleco Power.
Income Taxes
Federal and state income tax expense decreased $7.4 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due $16.7 million for the amortization of excess ADIT, $4.2 million for the change in pretax income, excluding AFUDC equity, $3.1 million of miscellaneous tax items, and $2.4 million for state tax expense. These decreases were partially offset by $10.7 million for adjustments to tax returns as filed, $6.0 million for the flowthrough of tax benefits, and $2.1 million of permanent tax deductions. The effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2020, was 22.6% which was different than the federal statutory rate. For more information about the
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
difference in the effective income tax rate and the federal statutory rate, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 11 — Income Taxes — Cleco.”
Results of operations for Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun are more fully described below.
Cleco Power
Significant Factors Affecting Cleco Power
Revenue is primarily affected by the following factors:
As an electric utility, Cleco Power is affected, to varying degrees, by a number of factors influencing the electric utility industry. These factors include, among others, an increasingly competitive business environment; the ability to recover costs through rate-setting proceedings; the ability to successfully perform in MISO and the related operating challenges; the cost of compliance with environmental and reliability regulations; conditions in the credit markets and global economy; changes in the federal and state regulation of generation, transmission, and the sale of electricity; the regulatory treatment of the TCJA, and the increasing uncertainty of future federal and state regulatory and environmental policies. For a discussion of various regulatory changes and competitive forces affecting Cleco Power and other electric utilities, see “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” Part I, Item 1, “Business — Regulatory Matters, Industry Developments, and Franchises,” and “— Financial Condition — Regulatory and Other Matters — Market Restructuring.” For a discussion of risk factors affecting Cleco Power’s business, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” For more information about the TCJA, see “— Financial Condition — Liquidity and Capital Resources — General Considerations and Credit-Related Risks — TCJA.”
Cleco Power’s residential customers’ demand for electricity is affected largely by weather. Weather is generally measured in cooling degree-days and heating degree-days. A cooling degree-day is an indication of the likelihood that a consumer will use air conditioning, while a heating degree-day is an indication of the likelihood that a consumer will use heating. An increase in heating degree-days does not produce the same increase in revenue as an increase in cooling degree-days because alternative heating sources are more readily available, and energy used in the winter is typically priced below the rate charged for energy used in the summer. Normal heating degree-days and cooling degree-days are calculated for a month by separately calculating the average actual heating and cooling degree-days for that month over a period of 30 years.
Over the last five years, Cleco Power’s non-industrial retail sales have been relatively steady. Cleco Power anticipates moderate growth in retail sales over the next five years. Cleco Power expects to begin providing service to expansions of current customers’ operations, as well as service to new retail customers. Cleco Power’s expectations and projections regarding retail sales are dependent upon factors such as weather conditions, natural gas prices, customer conservation efforts, retail marketing and business development programs, and the economy of Cleco Power’s service area. Cleco Power is pursuing load growth opportunities that include renewal of existing franchises and wholesale contracts as well as adding new wholesale customers and franchises. For more information on other expectations of future energy sales on Cleco Power, see “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements,” and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — Future Electricity Sales.”
Other issues facing the electric utility industry that could affect sales include:
•imposition of federal and/or state renewable portfolio standards,
•imposition of energy efficiency mandates,
•legislative and regulatory changes,
•increases in environmental regulations and compliance costs,
•cost of power impacted by the price movement of fuels and the addition of new generation capacity,
•transmission congestion costs,
•increases in capital and operations and maintenance costs due to higher construction and labor costs,
•changes in electric rates compared to customers’ ability to pay, and
•changes in the credit markets and local and global economies.
For more information on energy legislation in regulatory matters that could affect Cleco, see Part I, Item 1, “Business — Regulatory Matters, Industry Developments, and Franchises — Legislative and Regulatory Changes and Matters.”
Cleco Power’s revenues and earnings are substantially affected by regulatory proceedings known as rate cases, or in some cases, a request for extension of an FRP. During those cases, the LPSC determines Cleco Power’s rate base, depreciation rates, operation and maintenance costs, and administrative and general costs that Cleco Power may recover from its retail customers through its rates. In some instances, the outcome of a rate case or request for extension of an FRP may impact wholesale decisions of Cleco Power. These proceedings may examine, among other things, the prudence of Cleco Power’s operation and maintenance practices, level of expenditures, allowed rates of return, and previously incurred capital expenditures. The LPSC has the authority to disallow costs found not to have been prudently incurred. Rate cases generally have timelines of approximately one year, and decisions are typically subject to appeal, potentially leading to additional uncertainty. On June 28, 2019, Cleco Power filed an application with the LPSC for a new FRP. However, there has been a delay in the current rate case. Cleco anticipates new rates to be effective in the first half of 2021. The transmission tariffs of Cleco Power are regulated by FERC with its own regulatory proceedings. Both the LPSC and FERC regulatory proceedings can involve multiple parties, including governmental bodies and officials, consumer advocacy groups, and various consumers of energy, all of whom have differing concerns but who have the common objective of limiting rate increases or reducing rates.
Other expenses are primarily affected by the following factors:
The majority of Cleco Power’s non-fuel cost recovery expenses consist of other operations, maintenance, depreciation and amortization, and taxes other than income taxes. Other operations expenses are affected by, among other things, the cost of employee benefits, insurance expense, and the costs associated with energy delivery and customer service. Annual maintenance expenses associated with Cleco Power’s plants generally depend upon their physical characteristics, maintenance practices, and the effectiveness of their preventive maintenance programs. Transmission and
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
distribution maintenance expenses are generally affected by the level of repair and rehabilitation of lines to maintain reliability. Depreciation and amortization expense is primarily affected by the cost of the facilities in service, the time the facilities were placed in service, and the estimated useful life of the facilities. Taxes other than income taxes generally include payroll taxes, franchise taxes, and property taxes. Cleco Power anticipates certain non-fuel cost recovery expenses to be higher in 2021 as compared to 2020. These expenses include higher taxes other than income taxes, higher distribution operations and maintenance expense, higher depreciation and amortization expense, higher generation maintenance expense, and higher administration and general operations and maintenance expense.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | | FAVORABLE/(UNFAVORABLE) |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | VARIANCE | | CHANGE |
Operating revenue | | | | | | | |
Base | $ | 654,346 | | | $ | 669,091 | | | $ | (14,745) | | | (2.2) | % |
Fuel cost recovery | 360,672 | | | 461,837 | | | (101,165) | | | (21.9) | % |
Electric customer credits | (53,119) | | | (38,516) | | | (14,603) | | | (37.9) | % |
Other operations | 65,237 | | | 72,833 | | | (7,596) | | | (10.4) | % |
Affiliate revenue | 5,156 | | | 3,125 | | | 2,031 | | | 65.0 | % |
Operating revenue, net | 1,032,292 | | | 1,168,370 | | | (136,078) | | | (11.6) | % |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | |
Recoverable fuel and purchased power | 360,664 | | | 461,877 | | | 101,213 | | | 21.9 | % |
Non-recoverable fuel and purchased power | 33,526 | | | 34,648 | | | 1,122 | | | 3.2 | % |
Other operations and maintenance | 221,146 | | | 207,164 | | | (13,982) | | | (6.7) | % |
Depreciation and amortization | 166,987 | | | 172,471 | | | 5,484 | | | 3.2 | % |
Taxes other than income taxes | 44,631 | | | 43,742 | | | (889) | | | (2.0) | % |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | 826,954 | | | 919,902 | | | 92,948 | | | 10.1 | % |
Operating income | 205,338 | | | 248,468 | | | (43,130) | | | (17.4) | % |
Interest income | 3,362 | | | 4,744 | | | (1,382) | | | (29.1) | % |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 998 | | | 15,397 | | | (14,399) | | | (93.5) | % |
Other expense, net | (12,259) | | | (3,616) | | | (8,643) | | | (239.0) | % |
Interest charges | 73,985 | | | 71,279 | | | (2,706) | | | (3.8) | % |
Federal and state income tax expense | 26,799 | | | 45,452 | | | 18,653 | | | 41.0 | % |
Net income | $ | 96,655 | | | $ | 148,262 | | | $ | (51,607) | | | (34.8) | % |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
The following table shows the components of Cleco Power’s retail and wholesale customer sales related to base revenue:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | | FAVORABLE/ |
(MILLION kWh) | 2020 | | 2019 | | (UNFAVORABLE) |
Electric sales | | | | | |
Residential | 3,642 | | | 3,589 | | | 1.5 | % |
Commercial | 2,521 | | | 2,772 | | | (9.1) | % |
Industrial | 1,971 | | | 2,027 | | | (2.8) | % |
Other retail | 125 | | | 129 | | | (3.1) | % |
Total retail | 8,259 | | | 8,517 | | | (3.0) | % |
Sales for resale | 2,957 | | | 3,046 | | | (2.9) | % |
Total retail and wholesale customer sales | 11,216 | | | 11,563 | | | (3.0) | % |
The following table shows the components of Cleco Power’s base revenue:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | | FAVORABLE/ |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | (UNFAVORABLE) |
Electric sales | | | | | |
Residential | $ | 305,430 | | | $ | 297,204 | | | 2.8 | % |
Commercial | 189,066 | | | 198,664 | | | (4.8) | % |
Industrial | 87,313 | | | 84,030 | | | 3.9 | % |
Other retail | 10,895 | | | 10,786 | | | 1.0 | % |
Storm surcharge | 2,440 | | | 22,132 | | | (89.0) | % |
Total retail | 595,144 | | | 612,816 | | | (2.9) | % |
Sales for resale | 59,202 | | | 56,275 | | | 5.2 | % |
Total base revenue | $ | 654,346 | | | $ | 669,091 | | | (2.2) | % |
The following chart shows how cooling and heating degree-days varied from normal conditions and from the prior period. Cleco Power uses weather data provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to determine cooling and heating degree-days.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | | | | 2020 CHANGE |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | NORMAL | | PRIOR YEAR | | NORMAL |
Cooling degree-days | 3,179 | | | 3,178 | | | 2,779 | | | — | % | | 14.4 | % |
Heating degree-days | 1,105 | | | 1,325 | | | 1,547 | | | (16.6) | % | | (28.6) | % |
Significant factors affecting Cleco Power’s net income during the year ended December 31, 2020, are described below.
Base
Base revenue decreased $14.7 million in 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $18.6 million of lower Cleco Katrina/Rita storm restoration surcharge revenue as a result of the final principal and interest payments on the Cleco Katrina/Rita bonds in March 2020, $11.7 million related to lower usage from milder weather, and $6.3 million as a result of lower usage due to the impacts of Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta. Also contributing to the decrease was $5.9 million from lower usage due to the impacts of COVID-19. These decreases were partially offset by $14.0 million of higher unbilled revenue largely the result of colder December 2020 weather, $7.9 million of higher revenue related to the St. Mary Clean Energy
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Center project, $2.0 million related to the recognition of the revenue requirement of Coughlin Pipeline, and $1.7 million related to shared services associated with the Cleco Cajun Transaction.
For more information on the effects of future energy sales on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of Cleco Power, see “— Significant Factors Affecting Cleco Power,” “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — Future Electricity Sales.”
Fuel Cost Recovery/Recoverable Fuel and Purchased Power
Fuel costs historically have not significantly affected Cleco Power’s net income. Generally, fuel and purchased power expenses are recovered through the LPSC-established FAC, which enables Cleco Power to pass on to its customers substantially all such charges. Approximately 76% of Cleco Power’s total fuel cost during 2020 was regulated by the LPSC. Recovery of FAC costs is subject to periodic fuel audits by the LPSC which may result in a refund to customers. Generally, fuel and purchased power expenses are impacted by customer usage, the per unit cost of fuel used for electric generation, and the dispatch of Cleco Power’s generating facilities by MISO. Fuel and purchased power expenses may also be impacted by the interruption of the continuous supply of fuel due to adverse weather conditions and other factors. For more information on the accounting for MISO transactions, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Accounting for MISO Transactions.” For more information on Cleco Power’s most current fuel audit, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — LPSC Audits — Fuel Audit.”
Electric Customer Credits
Electric customer credits increased $14.6 million in 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to a net $18.8 million of higher estimated refunds for the federal tax-related benefits of the TCJA. This increase was partially offset by $2.3 million for the absence of FRP refunds and $1.7 million for the absence of refunds due to Cleco Power’s wholesale transmission customers associated with the FERC audit. For more information on the TCJA, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 13 — Regulation and Rates — TCJA.”
Other Operations Revenue
Other operations revenue decreased $7.6 million in 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $3.2 million of lower net generation revenue as a result of the Teche Unit 3 SSR ending in April 2019 and $3.0 million of lower transmission revenue. Also contributing to the decrease was $1.1 million of net lower forfeited discounts, which was partially the result of the LPSC executive order related to COVID-19. For more information on the SSR, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 13 — Regulation and Rates — SSR.”
Other Operations and Maintenance Expense
Other operations and maintenance expense increased $14.0 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to
$10.6 million of higher outside service expenses primarily related to information technology services and consulting expenses, $3.1 million of higher generation operations expenses largely due to the St. Mary Clean Energy Center project becoming operational in August 2019 and the absence of a major outage, $2.8 million of higher uncollectible expenses primarily related to adjustments to the provision for credit losses as a result of the COVID-19 disconnection moratorium order issued by the LPSC in March 2020, and $2.5 million of higher pension and other benefits costs. These increases were partially offset by $4.0 million of lower generating station routine and outage maintenance expenses, $1.8 million of lower distribution operations expenses as a result of more costs being capitalized due to Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta, and $1.2 million of lower administrative and general maintenance expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization decreased $5.5 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $18.4 million of lower amortization of storm damages as a result of the final principal and interest payments on the Cleco Katrina/Rita bonds and the absence of $2.5 million of amortization of corporate franchise taxes to a regulatory asset. These decreases were partially offset by $9.8 million of higher normal recurring additions to fixed assets and $6.2 million of higher amortization of intangible property due to the installation of the START project.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
Allowance for equity funds used during construction decreased $14.4 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $10.7 million of lower construction costs related to various projects. Also contributing to this decrease was $3.7 million of lower AFUDC rates driven by the impact of Cleco Power’s short-term debt borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit facility.
Other Expenses, Net
Other expense, net increased $8.6 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to higher pension non-service costs.
Interest Charges
Interest charges increased $2.7 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $4.6 million of lower allowance for borrowed funds used during construction related to various projects and $1.5 million related to the timing of accrued interest. These increases were partially offset by $2.7 million of lower interest on tax rate refunds and $1.0 million of lower interest on Cleco Katrina/Rita storm recovery bonds as a result of the final payment made in March 2020.
Income Taxes
Federal and state income taxes decreased $18.7 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $16.7 million for the amortization of excess ADIT, $11.0 million for the change in pretax income, excluding AFUDC equity, $5.4 million for state tax expense, and $2.7 million of miscellaneous tax items. These decreases were partially offset by $8.7 million for adjustments to tax returns as filed, $6.0 million for the flowthrough of tax benefits, and $2.3 million of permanent tax deductions. The effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2020, was 21.7% which was different than the
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
federal statutory rate. For more information about the difference in the effective income tax rate and the federal statutory rate, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 11 — Income Taxes — Cleco Power.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Cajun | | | | | | | |
| | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | FAVORABLE/(UNFAVORABLE) |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | VARIANCE | | CHANGE |
Operating revenue | | | | | | | |
Electric operations | $ | 365,555 | | | $ | 375,489 | | | $ | (9,934) | | | (2.6) | % |
Electric customer credits | (153) | | | (1,447) | | | 1,294 | | | 89.4 | % |
Other operations | 121,747 | | | 117,468 | | | 4,279 | | | 3.6 | % |
Affiliate revenue | 204 | | | 108 | | | 96 | | | 88.9 | % |
Operating revenue, net | 487,353 | | | 491,618 | | | (4,265) | | | (0.9) | % |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | |
Fuel used for electric generation | 33,377 | | | 81,514 | | | 48,137 | | | 59.1 | % |
Purchased power | 188,020 | | | 177,254 | | | (10,766) | | | (6.1) | % |
Other operations and maintenance | 91,250 | | | 91,215 | | | (35) | | | — | % |
Depreciation and amortization | 43,997 | | | 35,544 | | | (8,453) | | | (23.8) | % |
Taxes other than income taxes | 13,415 | | | 14,785 | | | 1,370 | | | 9.3 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | 370,059 | | | 400,312 | | | 30,253 | | | 7.6 | % |
Operating income | 117,294 | | | 91,306 | | | 25,988 | | | 28.5 | % |
Interest income | 273 | | | 987 | | | (714) | | | (72.3) | % |
Other income (expense), net | 255 | | | (368) | | | 623 | | | 169.3 | % |
Interest charges | (750) | | | 35 | | | 785 | | | * |
Federal and state income tax expense | 29,080 | | | 22,479 | | | (6,601) | | | (29.4) | % |
Net income | $ | 89,492 | | | $ | 69,411 | | | $ | 20,081 | | | 28.9 | % |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
*Not meaningful | | | | | | |
Significant factors affecting Cleco Cajun’s net income during the year ended December 31, 2020, are described below.
Electric Operations
Electric operations decreased $9.9 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $21.6 million related to lower fuel rates, $10.4 million related to lower load volumes, $7.1 million of lower MISO make whole payments, and $2.1 million of lower environmental recovery revenue. These decreases were partially offset by $30.8 million of increased electric operations revenue in 2020 as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction closing in February 2019.
Electric Customer Credits
Electric customer credits decreased $1.3 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $0.8 million for the absence of a refund due to municipality contracts and $0.5 million for the estimated refund due to wholesale customers related to a MISO refund.
Other Operations Revenue
Other operations revenue increased $4.3 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to higher lease revenue, including variable lease revenue, as a result of the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback.
Fuel Used for Electric Generation
Fuel used for electric generation decreased $48.1 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $24.7 million of lower coal consumption, $17.3 million of higher mark-to-market gains for gas related derivative contracts, and $10.0 million of lower gas consumption.
Purchased Power
Purchased power increased $10.8 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $16.8 million as a result of higher volumes of purchased power from MISO, which is partially the result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction closing in February 2019. These amounts were partially offset by $6.1 million of higher mark-to-market gains on FTRs.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $8.5 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $7.1 million of higher normal recurring additions to fixed assets and $1.3 million of higher depreciation on ARO assets. These increases were partially the result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction closing in February 2019.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes decreased $1.4 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to lower property taxes.
Income Taxes
Federal and state income taxes increased $6.6 million during 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to $5.6 million for the change in pretax income and $2.6 million for state tax expense, partially offset by $1.5 million of permanent tax deductions. The effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2020, was 24.5% which was different than the federal statutory rate.
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2019, and 2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | | FAVORABLE/(UNFAVORABLE) |
(THOUSANDS) | 2019 | | 2018 | | VARIANCE | | CHANGE |
Operating revenue, net | $ | 1,639,605 | | | $ | 1,231,044 | | | $ | 408,561 | | | 33.2 | % |
Operating expenses | 1,324,711 | | | 986,487 | | | 338,224 | | | 34.3 | % |
Operating income | 314,894 | | | 244,557 | | | 70,337 | | | 28.8 | % |
Interest income | 6,090 | | | 6,073 | | | 17 | | | 0.3 | % |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 15,397 | | | 14,159 | | | $ | 1,238 | | | 8.7 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Other income (expense), net | 758 | | | (14,328) | | | $ | 15,086 | | | 105.3 | % |
Interest charges | 141,309 | | | 126,642 | | | $ | (14,667) | | | (11.6) | % |
Federal and state income tax expense | 43,165 | | | 29,382 | | | $ | (13,783) | | | (46.9) | % |
Net income | $ | 152,665 | | | $ | 94,437 | | | $ | 58,228 | | | 61.7 | % |
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue, net increased $408.6 million during 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to the addition of $375.5 million of electric operations and $117.5 million of other operations revenue at Cleco Cajun. These increases were
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
partially offset by $51.4 million of lower fuel cost recovery at Cleco Power.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased $338.2 million during 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to the addition of $400.3 million of Cleco Cajun’s operating expenses, as well as $10.4 million of higher depreciation and amortization expenses and $4.6 million of higher other operations and maintenance expenses at Cleco Power. These increases were partially offset by $51.3 million of lower recoverable fuel and purchased power expenses at Cleco Power.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net increased $15.1 million during 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to $10.3 million for the increase in cash surrender value of certain trust-owned life insurance policies as a result of favorable market conditions at Cleco Holdings and $4.0 million of lower pension non-service costs at Cleco Power.
Interest Charges
Interest charges increased $14.7 million during 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to $9.3 million of interest associated with the financing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction and $3.2 million of interest associated with the private placement of senior notes entered into on September 11, 2019, at Cleco Holdings. For more information about the senior notes issued on September 11, 2019, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 9 — Debt — Cleco Debt.”
Income Taxes
Federal and state income tax expense increased $13.8 million during 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to the change in pretax income, excluding AFUDC equity. The effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2020, was 22.0% which was different than the federal statutory rate. For more information about the difference in the effective income tax rate and the federal statutory rate, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 11 — Income Taxes — Cleco.”
Results of operations for Cleco Power are more fully described below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | | FAVORABLE/(UNFAVORABLE) |
(THOUSANDS) | 2019 | | 2018 | | VARIANCE | | CHANGE |
Operating revenue | | | | | | | |
Base | $ | 669,091 | | | $ | 678,378 | | | $ | (9,287) | | | (1.4) | % |
Fuel cost recovery | 461,837 | | | 513,209 | | | (51,372) | | | (10.0) | % |
Electric customer credits | (38,516) | | | (33,195) | | | (5,321) | | | (16.0) | % |
Other operations | 72,833 | | | 82,330 | | | (9,497) | | | (11.5) | % |
Affiliate revenue | 3,125 | | | 874 | | | 2,251 | | | 257.6 | % |
Operating revenue, net | 1,168,370 | | | 1,241,596 | | | (73,226) | | | (5.9) | % |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | |
Recoverable fuel and purchased power | 461,877 | | | 513,206 | | | 51,329 | | | 10.0 | % |
Non-recoverable fuel and purchased power | 34,648 | | | 37,530 | | | 2,882 | | | 7.7 | % |
Other operations and maintenance | 207,164 | | | 202,552 | | | (4,612) | | | (2.3) | % |
Depreciation and amortization | 172,471 | | | 162,069 | | | (10,402) | | | (6.4) | % |
Taxes other than income taxes | 43,742 | | | 47,267 | | | 3,525 | | | 7.5 | % |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | 919,902 | | | 962,624 | | | 42,722 | | | 4.4 | % |
Operating income | 248,468 | | | 278,972 | | | (30,504) | | | (10.9) | % |
Interest income | 4,744 | | | 5,052 | | | (308) | | | (6.1) | % |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 15,397 | | | 14,159 | | | 1,238 | | | 8.7 | % |
Other expense, net | (3,616) | | | (8,699) | | | 5,083 | | | 58.4 | % |
Interest charges | 71,279 | | | 71,303 | | | 24 | | | — | % |
Federal and state income tax expense | 45,452 | | | 55,924 | | | 10,472 | | | 18.7 | % |
Net income | $ | 148,262 | | | $ | 162,257 | | | $ | (13,995) | | | (8.6) | % |
| | | | | | | |
The following table shows the components of Cleco Power’s retail and wholesale customer sales related to base revenue:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | | FAVORABLE/ |
(MILLION kWh) | 2019 | | 2018 | | (UNFAVORABLE) |
Electric sales | | | | | |
Residential | 3,589 | | | 3,780 | | | (5.1) | % |
Commercial | 2,772 | | | 2,731 | | | 1.5 | % |
Industrial | 2,027 | | | 2,243 | | | (9.6) | % |
Other retail | 129 | | | 133 | | | (3.0) | % |
Total retail | 8,517 | | | 8,887 | | | (4.2) | % |
Sales for resale | 3,046 | | | 2,991 | | | 1.8 | % |
Total retail and wholesale customer sales | 11,563 | | | 11,878 | | | (2.7) | % |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
The following table shows the components of Cleco Power’s base revenue:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | | FAVORABLE/ |
(THOUSANDS) | 2019 | | 2018 | | (UNFAVORABLE) |
Electric sales | | | | | |
Residential | $ | 297,204 | | | $ | 304,708 | | | (2.5) | % |
Commercial | 198,664 | | | 192,781 | | | 3.1 | % |
Industrial | 84,030 | | | 90,291 | | | (6.9) | % |
Other retail | 10,786 | | | 10,918 | | | (1.2) | % |
Surcharge | 22,132 | | | 23,138 | | | (4.3) | % |
Total retail | 612,816 | | | 621,836 | | | (1.5) | % |
Sales for resale | 56,275 | | | 56,542 | | | (0.5) | % |
Total base revenue | $ | 669,091 | | | $ | 678,378 | | | (1.4) | % |
The following chart shows how cooling and heating degree-days varied from normal conditions and from the prior period. Cleco Power uses weather data provided by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to determine cooling and heating degree-days.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| | | | | | | 2019 CHANGE |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | NORMAL | | PRIOR YEAR | | NORMAL |
Cooling degree-days | 3,178 | | | 3,311 | | | 2,779 | | | (4.0) | % | | 14.4 | % |
Heating degree-days | 1,325 | | | 1,470 | | | 1,547 | | | (9.9) | % | | (14.4) | % |
Base revenue decreased $9.3 million in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to $6.8 million of milder weather and $2.5 million of lower rates.
Fuel Cost Recovery/Recoverable Fuel and Purchased Power
Fuel costs historically have not significantly affected Cleco Power’s net income. Generally, fuel and purchased power expenses are recovered through the LPSC-established FAC, which enables Cleco Power to pass on to its customers substantially all such charges. Approximately 76% of Cleco Power’s total fuel cost during 2019 was regulated by the LPSC. Recovery of FAC costs is subject to periodic fuel audits by the LPSC which may result in a refund to customers. Generally, fuel and purchased power expenses are impacted by customer usage, the per unit cost of fuel used for electric generation, and the dispatch of Cleco Power’s generating facilities by MISO. Fuel and purchased power expenses were also impacted by the interruption of the continuous supply of lignite due to adverse weather conditions and other factors that disrupted mining operations and transportation to Dolet Hills Power Station. For more information on the accounting for MISO transactions, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Accounting for MISO Transactions.” For more information on Cleco Power’s most current fuel audit, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — LPSC Audits — Fuel Audit.”
Electric Customer Credits
Electric customer credits increased $5.3 million in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily related to $3.4 million for the estimated refunds due to Cleco Power’s wholesale
transmission customers as a result of the FERC audit and $2.3 million of higher estimated FRP refunds. For more information on the FERC audit, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 13 — Regulation and Rates — FRP” and “Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — FERC Audit.”
Other Operations Revenue
Other operations revenue decreased $9.5 million in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily related to $6.8 million of lower net generation revenue as a result of the Teche Unit 3 SSR ending in April 2019 and $2.1 million of lower reconnect fees. For more information on the SSR, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 13 — Regulation and Rates — SSR.”
Non-Recoverable Fuel and Purchased Power
Non-recoverable fuel and purchased power decreased $2.9 million in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to lower MISO transmission costs as a result of the Teche Unit 3 SSR ending in April 2019.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expense
Other operations and maintenance expense increased $4.6 million during 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily related to $6.9 million of higher outside service expenses, $6.4 million of higher generation operations expenses, and $4.1 million of higher customer service expenses, partially offset by $13.0 million of lower generating station outage maintenance expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $10.4 million during 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily related to $4.0 million of lower deferrals of corporate franchise taxes to a regulatory asset, $3.8 million of higher normal recurring additions to fixed assets, and $2.7 million of higher amortization of intangible property due to the installation of the START project.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes decreased $3.5 million in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily related to lower corporate franchise taxes.
Other Expenses, Net
Other expense, net decreased $5.1 million during 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily related to $4.0 million of lower pension non-service costs and $0.6 million for the change in cash surrender value of life insurance policies.
Income Taxes
Federal and state income taxes decreased $10.5 million in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to $6.2 million for the change in pretax income, excluding AFUDC equity, $3.2 million for flowthrough of state tax benefits, and $2.5 million of adjustment to tax returns as filed. These decreases were partially offset by $1.4 million of miscellaneous tax items. The effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2019, was 23.5% which was different than the federal statutory rate. For more information on the TCJA, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 11 — Income Taxes — TCJA” and “Note 13 — Regulation and Rates — TCJA.”
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
Cleco Cajun | |
(THOUSANDS) | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2019 |
Operating revenue | |
Electric operations | $ | 375,489 | |
Electric customer credits | (1,447) | |
Other operations | 117,468 | |
Affiliate revenue | 108 | |
Operating revenue, net | 491,618 | |
Operating expenses | |
Fuel used for electric generation | 81,514 | |
Purchased power | 177,254 | |
Other operations and maintenance | 91,215 | |
Depreciation and amortization | 35,544 | |
Taxes other than income taxes | 14,785 | |
| |
Total operating expenses | 400,312 | |
Operating income | 91,306 | |
Interest income | 987 | |
Other expense, net | (368) | |
Interest charges | 35 | |
Federal and state income tax expense | 22,479 | |
Net income | $ | 69,411 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Significant factors affecting Cleco Cajun’s net income from the closing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction on February 4, 2019, through December 31, 2019, are described below.
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue, net of $491.6 million during 2019 primarily consisted of $375.5 million of electric operations revenue from wholesale customers, $57.1 million of lease revenue, including variable lease revenue, as a result of the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback, and $47.9 million of transmission revenue from wholesale customers. For more information on the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback agreement, see Item 8, “Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 4 — Leases — Lessor Agreements — Cottonwood Sale Leaseback Agreement.”
Operating Expense
Operating expenses of $400.3 million during 2019 primarily consisted of $120.5 million of purchased power from MISO, $81.5 million of fuel expenses for generation, $50.3 million of MISO transmission costs, $34.9 million of depreciation on fixed assets, $29.2 million of general and administrative expense, $27.5 million for generating station operations expenses, and $26.5 million of routine generating station maintenance expenses.
Income Taxes
Federal and state income taxes of $22.5 million during 2019 primarily included $19.3 million of tax expense on pretax income at the statutory tax rate and $2.7 million for state taxes. The effective income tax rate for 2019 was 24.5%. The estimated annual effective income tax rate used for 2019 for Cleco Cajun was not indicative of the full-year income tax rate.
Non-GAAP Measure
The financial results in the following tables are presented on an accrual basis. EBITDA is a key non-GAAP financial measure used by the CEO to assess the operating performance of Cleco’s segments. Management evaluates the performance of Cleco’s segments and allocates resources to them based on segment profit and the requirements to implement strategic initiatives and projects to meet current business objectives. EBITDA is defined as net income adjusted for interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization.
The following tables set forth a reconciliation of net income, the nearest comparable GAAP financial performance measure, to EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2020, and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
(THOUSANDS) | CLECO POWER | | CLECO CAJUN | | CLECO POWER | | CLECO CAJUN | | CLECO POWER |
Net income | $ | 96,655 | | | $ | 89,492 | | | $ | 148,262 | | | $ | 69,411 | | | $ | 162,257 | |
Add: Depreciation and amortization | 166,987 | | | 47,183 | | (1) | 172,471 | | | 38,465 | | (2) | 162,069 | |
Less: Interest income | 3,362 | | | 273 | | | 4,744 | | | 987 | | | 5,052 | |
Add: Interest charges | 73,985 | | | (750) | | | 71,279 | | | 35 | | | 71,303 | |
Add: Federal and state income tax expense | 26,799 | | | 29,080 | | | 45,452 | | | 22,479 | | | 55,924 | |
EBITDA | $ | 361,064 | | | $ | 164,732 | | | $ | 432,720 | | | $ | 129,403 | | | $ | 446,501 | |
(1) Includes $12.4 million of amortization of intangible assets and liabilities related to wholesale power supply agreements as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction and $(9.2) million of deferred lease revenue amortization as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction. (2) Includes $11.4 million of amortization of intangible assets and liabilities related to wholesale power supply agreements as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction and $(8.4) million of deferred lease revenue amortization as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO POWER — NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
For a narrative analysis of the results of operations explaining the revenue and expense items of Cleco Power for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, see “— Results of Operations — Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2020, and 2019 — Cleco Power.”
For a narrative analysis of the results of operations explaining the revenue and expense items of Cleco Power for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, see “— Results of Operations — Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2019, and 2018 — Cleco Power.”
The narrative analysis referenced above should be read in combination with Cleco Power’s Financial Statements and the Notes contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Cleco’s critical accounting policies include accounting policies that are important to Cleco’s financial condition and results of operations and that require management to make difficult, subjective, or complex judgments about future events, which could result in a material impact to the financial statements of Cleco. The preparation of financial statements contained in this report requires management to make estimates and
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
assumptions. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be made with certainty. These estimates involve judgments regarding many factors that in and of themselves could materially affect the financial statements and disclosures. On an ongoing basis, these estimates and assumptions are evaluated and, if necessary, adjustments are made when warranted by new or updated information or by a change in circumstances or environment. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For more information on Cleco’s accounting policies, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
Cleco believes that the following are the most significant critical accounting policies:
•Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits: To determine assets, liabilities, and expenses relating to pension and other postretirement benefits, management must make assumptions about future trends. Assumptions and estimates include, but are not limited to, discount rates, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, future rate of compensation increases, and medical inflation trend rates. These assumptions are reviewed and updated on an annual basis. Changes in the rates from year-to-year and newly-enacted laws could have a material effect on Cleco’s financial condition and results of operations by changing the recorded assets, liabilities, expense, or required funding of the pension plan obligation. One component of pension expense is the expected return on plan assets. It is an assumed percentage return on the market-related value of plan assets. The market-related value of plan assets differs from the fair value of plan assets by the amount of deferred asset gains or losses. Actual asset returns that differ from the expected return on plan assets are deferred and recognized in the market-related value of assets on a straight-line basis over a five-year period. The 2020 return on plan assets was 15.89% compared to an expected long-term return of 5.91%. For 2019, the plan assets had a return of 22.17% compared to an expected long-term return of 6.55%. For the calculation of the 2021 periodic expense, Cleco decreased the expected long-term return on plan assets to 5.00%.
Management uses a theoretical bond portfolio in order to calculate the discount rate for the measurement of liabilities. As a result of the annual review of assumptions, the pension plan discount rate decreased from 3.43% to 2.74% for the December 31, 2020, measurement of liabilities.
A change in the assumed discount rate creates a deferred actuarial gain or loss. Generally, when the assumed discount rate decreases compared to the prior measurement date, a deferred actuarial loss is created. When the assumed discount rate increases compared to the prior measurement date, a deferred actuarial gain is created. Actuarial gains and losses also are created when actual results, such as compensation increases, differ from assumptions. On December 31, 2020, Cleco Power recognized a $30.1 million actuarial loss primarily related to a decrease in discount rate offset partially by higher than expected return on assets. Historically, Cleco Power has been allowed to recover pension plan expenses; therefore, deferred actuarial gains and losses are recorded as a
regulatory asset or liability. The net of the deferred gains and losses is amortized to pension expense over the average service life of the remaining plan participants (approximately seven years as of December 31, 2020, for Cleco’s plan) when it exceeds certain thresholds. This approach of amortizing gains and losses has the effect of reducing the volatility of pension expense. Over time, it is not expected to reduce or increase the pension expense relative to an approach that immediately recognizes losses and gains.
The following table shows the impact of a 0.5% change in Cleco’s pension plan discount rate, salary scale, and rate of return on plan assets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTION (THOUSANDS) | CHANGE IN ASSUMPTION | | CHANGE IN PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATION | | CHANGE IN ESTIMATED BENEFIT COST |
Discount rate | 0.5% increase | | $ | (48,301) | | | $ | (4,927) | |
| 0.5% decrease | | $ | 54,334 | | | $ | 5,447 | |
Salary scale | 0.5% increase | | $ | 9,514 | | | $ | 1,844 | |
| 0.5% decrease | | $ | (8,665) | | | $ | (1,676) | |
Expected return on assets | 0.5% increase | | $ | — | | | $ | (2,281) | |
| 0.5% decrease | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,281 | |
Cleco Power made a $15.8 million required contribution to the pension plan in December 2020 and a $12.3 million discretionary contribution to the pension plan in 2019. Cleco Power did not make any required or discretionary contributions to the pension plan in 2018. Based on funding assumptions at December 31, 2020, management estimates that $53.5 million in pension contributions will be required through 2025. Cleco expects to make $67.0 million in discretionary contributions during 2021, which would reduce the future required contributions. Future discretionary contributions may be made depending on changes in assumptions, the ability to utilize the contribution as a tax deduction, and requirements concerning recognizing a minimum pension liability. Future required contributions are driven by liability funding target percentages set by law which could cause the required contributions to change from year-to-year. The ultimate amount and timing of the contributions will be affected by changes in the discount rate, changes in the funding regulations, and actual returns on fund assets. Adverse changes in assumptions or adverse actual events could cause additional minimum contributions.
For more information on pension and other postretirement benefits, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 10 — Pension Plan and Employee Benefits.”
•Regulatory Accounting: Cleco has concluded it is probable that regulatory assets can be recovered from ratepayers in future rates. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $275.5 million of net regulatory assets. As a result of the 2016 Merger, Cleco Holdings recognized regulatory assets. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Holdings had $147.8 million of regulatory assets. If future recovery of costs ceases to be probable due to actions by the LPSC or other factors, Cleco could be required to record a loss on some or all of its regulatory assets. For more information on this regulatory accounting policy, see “— Cleco Power.” For more information on the LPSC and regulatory assets, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
the Financial Statements — Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Regulation,” and “Note 6 — Regulatory Assets and Liabilities.”
•Income Taxes: Income tax expense and related balance sheet amounts are comprised of a “current” portion and a “deferred” portion. The current portion represents Cleco’s estimate of the income taxes payable or receivable for the current year. The deferred portion represents Cleco’s estimate of the future income tax effects of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or income tax returns in the current or prior years. Cleco makes assumptions and estimates when it records income taxes, such as its ability to deduct items on its tax returns, the timing of the deduction, and the effect of regulation on income taxes. Cleco’s income tax expense and related assets and liabilities could be affected by changes in its assumptions and estimates and by ultimate resolution of assumptions and estimates with taxing authorities. The actual results may differ from the estimated results based on these assumptions and may have a material effect on Cleco’s results of operations.
For more information on income taxes, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 11 — Income Taxes.”
•Loss Contingencies: Cleco is currently involved in certain legal proceedings and management has estimated the probable costs for the resolution of these claims. These estimates are based on an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement assumptions. For more information on legal proceedings affecting Cleco, see Part I, Item 1, “Business — Environmental Matters — Air Quality,” Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — Litigation,” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation.”
•Business Combinations: Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an acquired business are recorded at their estimated fair value on the date of acquisition. The difference between the purchase price amount and the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill on the balance sheet if it exceeds the estimated fair value. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management’s judgment, often utilizing independent valuation experts, and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Intangible assets and liabilities were recognized as a result of fair value adjustments in connection with the 2016 Merger and the Cleco Cajun Transaction. Management’s judgments and estimates could materially impact the financial statements in periods after acquisition, such as through depreciation, amortization, and impairments of intangible assets and liabilities. For more information on the Cleco Cajun Transaction and on intangible assets and liabilities, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 3 — Business Combinations” and “Note 17 — Intangible Assets, Intangible Liabilities, and Goodwill.”
•Goodwill: On April 13, 2016, in connection with the completion of the 2016 Merger, Cleco recognized goodwill of $1.49 billion, all of which was assigned to the Cleco Power reporting unit. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires management to make significant assumptions and estimates, including the identification of reporting units, assignments of assets and liabilities to reporting units, assignment of goodwill to reporting units, and the determination of the fair value of the reporting units, in which independent valuation experts are often used. Changes in management’s assumptions and estimates could materially affect the determination of fair value and goodwill impairment. For more information on goodwill recorded in connection with the 2016 Merger, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 17 — Intangible Assets, Intangible Liabilities, and Goodwill — Goodwill.”
Cleco Power
Cleco Power’s retail rates are regulated by the LPSC and its tariffs for transmission services are regulated by FERC, while rates for wholesale power sales are based on market-based rates and ultimately reviewed by FERC. Cleco Power must evaluate its various transactions related to regulatory orders and accounting guidance to ensure the appropriate timing of revenue recognition, the evaluation of cost deferral and the recoverability and refund of certain assets. Future rate changes could have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of Cleco Power. Areas that could be materially impacted by future actions of regulators are described below:
•The LPSC determines the ability of Cleco Power to recover prudent costs incurred in developing long-lived assets. If the LPSC were to rule that the cost of current or future long-lived assets was imprudent and not recoverable, Cleco Power could be required to write down the imprudent cost and incur a corresponding impairment loss. At December 31, 2020, the carrying value of Cleco Power’s long-lived assets was $3.76 billion. Currently, Cleco Power has concluded that none of its long-lived assets are impaired.
•The LPSC determines the amount and type of fuel and purchased power expenses that Cleco Power can charge customers through the FAC. Changes in the determination of allowable costs already incurred by Cleco Power could cause material changes in fuel revenue. On March 31, 2020, Cleco Power received a notice of audit from the LPSC for the period of January 2018 to December 2019. The total amount of fuel expense included in the audit is $565.8 million. Cleco Power has responded to several sets of data requests from the LPSC. Cleco Power has FAC filings for January 2020 and thereafter that are subject to audit. Management believes all FAC costs were prudently incurred. Management is unable to predict or give a reasonable estimate of the possible range of the disallowance, if any, by the LPSC related to these filings. For more information on LPSC fuel audits, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
about Guarantees —Litigation — LPSC Audits.” For information on fuel revenue, see “— Results of Operations — Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2020, and 2019 — Cleco Power — Significant Factors Affecting Cleco Power — Fuel Cost Recovery/Recoverable Fuel and Power Purchased.”
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General Considerations and Credit-Related Risks
Credit Ratings and Counterparties
Financing for operational needs and capital expenditure requirements not satisfied by operating cash flows depends upon the cost and availability of external funds through both short- and long-term financing. The inability to raise capital on favorable terms could negatively affect Cleco’s ability to maintain or expand its businesses. Access to funds is dependent upon factors such as general economic and capital market conditions, including the impact of COVID-19, regulatory authorizations and policies, Cleco Holdings’ and Cleco Power’s credit ratings, cash flows from routine operations, and credit ratings of project counterparties. After assessing the current operating performance, liquidity, and credit ratings of Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power, management believes that Cleco will have access to the capital markets at prevailing market rates for companies with comparable credit ratings. The following table presents the credit ratings of Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power at December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| SENIOR UNSECURED DEBT | | CORPORATE/LONG-TERM ISSUER |
| S&P | MOODY’S | FITCH | | S&P | MOODY’S | FITCH |
Cleco Holdings | BBB- | Baa3 | BBB- | | BBB- | Baa3 | BBB- |
Cleco Power | BBB+ | A3 | BBB+ | | BBB+ | A3 | BBB |
Credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold securities, and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power pay fees and interest under their bank credit agreements based on the highest rating held. Savings are dependent upon the level of borrowings. If Cleco Holdings’ or Cleco Power’s credit ratings were to be downgraded, Cleco Holdings or Cleco Power, respectively, could be required to pay additional fees and incur higher interest rates for borrowings under their respective credit facilities.
Cleco may be required to provide credit support with respect to any open trading contracts that Cleco has or may initiate in the future. The amount of credit support that Cleco may be required to provide at any point in the future is dependent on the notional value of the initial contract, changes in forward market prices, changes in the volume of open contracts, changes in credit ratings or credit quality where netting agreements are in place, and changes in the amount counterparties owe Cleco. Changes in any of these factors could cause the amount of requested credit support to increase or decrease.
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun participate in the MISO market. MISO requires Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun to provide credit support which may increase or decrease due to
the timing of the settlement schedules and MISO margining formulas. On February 24, 2021, Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun posted collateral in the amount of $21.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, with MISO as a result of increased net purchased power costs related to Winter Storms Uri and Viola exceeding the respective unsecured credit capacity with MISO. For more information about MISO, see “— Regulatory and Other Matters — Transmission Rates.” For more information about credit support, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation — Off-Balance Sheet Commitments and Guarantees.” For more information on Winter Storms Uri and Viola, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 19 — Storm Restoration — Winter Storms Uri and Viola.”
Global and U.S. Economic Environment
Global and domestic economic conditions may have an impact on Cleco’s business and financial condition. Access to capital markets is a significant source of funding for both short- and long-term capital requirements not satisfied by operating cash flows. During periods of capital market volatility, the availability of capital could be limited and the costs of capital may increase for many companies. Although the Registrants have not experienced restrictions in the financial markets, their ability to access the capital markets may be restricted at a time when the Registrants would like, or need, to do so. Any restrictions could have a material impact on the Registrants’ ability to fund capital expenditures or debt service, or on their flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions. Credit constraints could have a material negative impact on the Registrants’ lenders or customers, causing them to fail to meet their obligations to the Registrants or to delay payment of such obligations. The lower interest rates to which the Registrants have been exposed have been beneficial to debt issuances; however, these rates have negatively affected interest income for the Registrants’ short-term investments.
TCJA
The provisions of the TCJA reduced the top federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. As a result of the tax rate reduction, on January 1, 2018, Cleco Power began accruing an estimated reduction in reserve for the federal statutory corporate income tax rate. In February 2018, the LPSC directed utilities, including Cleco Power, to provide considerations of the appropriate manner to flowthrough to ratepayers the benefits of the reduction in corporate income taxes as a result of the TCJA. In July 2019, the LPSC approved Cleco Power’s rate refund of $79.2 million, plus interest, for the reduction in the statutory federal tax rate for the period from January 2018 to June 2020. This refund was credited to customers over 12 months beginning August 1, 2019.
In July 2019, the LPSC also approved Cleco Power’s motion to address the rate redesign and the regulatory liability for excess ADIT, resulting from the enactment of the TCJA, in Cleco Power’s current base rate case.
As a result of the delay in the rate case, on July 15, 2020, the LPSC approved Cleco Power’s application to extend the TCJA bill credits at the same rate as determined in the initial TCJA refund of approximately $7.0 million per month. The extension was for the period of August 2020 through November 2020. On November 13, 2020, Cleco Power again received approval of its application to extend the TCJA bill
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
credits from November 30, 2020, until such time that the rate case is complete. The $7.0 million monthly refund will consist of approximately $4.4 million, which is to be funded by the unprotected excess ADIT, and approximately $2.5 million, which is the change in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $2.1 million accrued for the estimated federal tax-related benefits from the TCJA. The mechanism to refund the remaining balance of the excess ADIT will be determined in Cleco Power’s current LPSC base rate case. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $352.4 million accrued for the excess ADIT, of which $18.5 million is reflected in current regulatory liabilities. Cleco Power’s current base rate case is ongoing and management is unable to determine its outcome.
Fair Value Measurements
Various accounting pronouncements require certain assets and liabilities to be measured at their fair values. Some assets and liabilities are required to be measured at their fair value each reporting period, while others are required to be measured only one time, generally the date of acquisition or debt issuance. Cleco and Cleco Power are required to disclose the fair value of certain assets and liabilities by one of three levels. Other financial assets and liabilities are reported at their carrying values at their date of issuance on the consolidated balance sheets with their fair values as of the balance sheet date disclosed within the three levels. For more information about fair value levels, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 8 — Fair Value Accounting.”
Cash Generation and Cash Requirements
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
Various agreements to which Cleco is subject contain covenants that restrict its use of cash. As certain provisions under these agreements are met, cash is transferred out of related escrow accounts and becomes available for its intended purposes and/or general company purposes. For more information on Cleco and Cleco Power’s restricted cash and cash equivalents, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents.”
Debt
Cleco
At December 31, 2020, Cleco had $75.0 million of short-term debt outstanding under its $475.0 million revolving credit facilities, at an average all-in interest rate of 1.40%. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, Cleco has implemented certain measures that it believes will provide financial flexibility and help Cleco maintain liquidity. For additional discussion regarding certain risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — COVID-19.” Cleco had no short-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2019.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco’s long-term debt and finance leases outstanding was $3.23 billion, of which $66.7 million was due within one year. The long-term debt due within one year at December 31, 2020, primarily represents $66.0 million of principal payments on Cleco Holdings’ debt as required by the Cleco Cajun Transaction commitments to the
LPSC. Long-term debt increased by $41.4 million from December 31, 2019, primarily due to Cleco Power’s $125.0 million term loan agreement entered into on August 28, 2020. This increase was partially offset by the $64.0 million payment on Cleco Holdings’ bank term loans in November 2020, and the $11.1 million final principal payment made on the Cleco Katrina/Rita storm recovery bonds on March 2, 2020. For more information on Cleco’s debt, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 9 — Debt.”
Cash and cash equivalents available at December 31, 2020, were $85.0 million combined with $400.0 million available revolving credit facility capacity ($175.0 million from Cleco Holdings and $225.0 million from Cleco Power) for total liquidity of $485.0 million. For more information on the credit facility capacity, see “— Credit Facilities.” Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power have uncommitted lines of credit that allow up to $10.0 million each in short-term borrowings, but no more than $10.0 million in the aggregate, to support their working capital needs.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco and Cleco Power were exposed to concentrations of credit risk through their short-term investments classified as cash equivalents. In order to mitigate potential credit risk, Cleco and Cleco Power have established guidelines for short-term investments. For more information on the concentration of credit risk through short-term investments classified as cash equivalents, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 8 — Fair Value Accounting.”
At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco had a working capital surplus of $140.3 million and $126.7 million, respectively. The $13.6 million increase in working capital is primarily due to:
•a $59.3 million decrease in long-term debt due within one year primarily due to the long-term refinancing of $50.0 million 2008 Series A GO Zone bonds and the $11.1 million final principal payment on the Cleco Katrina/Rita storm recovery bonds on March 2, 2020,
•a $29.5 million decrease in provision for rate refund primarily due to refunds to Cleco Power customers for tax-related benefits of the TCJA,
•a $26.4 million increase in fuel inventory primarily due to a decrease in coal consumption at Cleco Cajun, and
•a $13.6 million increase in material and supplies inventory primarily due to higher purchases for Cleco Power’s storm restoration and other projects.
These increases in working capital were partially offset by:
•a $75.0 million increase in short-term debt due to a draw on Cleco Power’s revolving credit facility,
•a $31.3 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents, and
•a $16.8 million increase in regulatory liabilities primarily due to the reclassification of the short-term portion of the regulatory liability related to the TCJA, partially offset by credits to Cleco Power’s customers for the TCJA refunds and the absence of over collections of revenue from the delay of the St. Mary Clean Energy Center project.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
At December 31, 2020, Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheets reflected $4.97 billion of total liabilities compared to $4.83 billion at December 31, 2019. The $135.3 million increase in total liabilities during 2020 was primarily due to:
•an increase in short-term debt of $75.0 million due to a draw on Cleco Power’s revolving credit facility,
•an increase in total long-term debt of $41.4 million, as previously discussed,
•an increase in postretirement benefit obligations of $31.6 million primarily due to lower discount rates, and
•an increase in net deferred taxes regulatory liabilities of $28.6 million primarily due to temporary tax differences and adjustments to tax returns as filed, partially offset by the amortization of excess ADIT related to the TCJA.
These increases in total liabilities were partially offset by:
•a decrease in provision for rate refund of $29.5 million primarily due to refunds to Cleco Power customers for tax-related benefits of the TCJA and
•a decrease in restricted storm reserve of $12.3 million primarily due to storm costs.
Cleco Holdings
Cleco Holdings had no short-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2020, and 2019.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Holding’s long-term debt outstanding was $1.60 billion, $66.0 million of which was due within one year. The long-term debt due within one year at December 31, 2020, represents principal payments on Cleco Holdings’ debt as required by the Cleco Cajun Transaction commitments to the LPSC. For Cleco Holdings, long-term debt decreased $63.7 million primarily due to the $64.0 million payment on Cleco Holdings’ bank term loans.
At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco Holdings had no borrowings outstanding under its $175.0 million revolving credit facility. For more information on Cleco Holding’s revolving credit facility, see “— Credit Facilities.” Cleco Holdings has an uncommitted line of credit that allows up to $10.0 million in short-term borrowings, but no more than $10.0 million in the aggregate with Cleco Power’s similar line of credit, to support its working capital needs. There were no amounts outstanding under the uncommitted line of credit at December 31, 2020.
Cash and cash equivalents available at Cleco Holdings at December 31, 2020, were $21.6 million, combined with $175.0 million available revolving credit facility capacity for a total liquidity of $196.6 million.
Cleco Power
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $75.0 million of short-term debt outstanding under its $300.0 million revolving credit facility, at an all-in interest rate of 1.40%. For more information on Cleco Power’s revolving credit facility, see “— Credit Facilities.” Cleco Power had no short-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2019. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, Cleco has implemented certain measures that it believes will provide financial flexibility and help Cleco maintain liquidity. For additional discussion regarding certain risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — COVID-19.” Although Cleco Power believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its current obligations and to fund Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta restoration
efforts from a combination of cash on hand and available capacity under its revolving credit facilities, Cleco Power is exploring options to supplement its liquidity until such time securitization of such costs can be completed. For more information on Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 19 — Storm Restoration.” Cleco Power has an uncommitted line of credit that allows up to $10.0 million in short-term borrowings, but no more than $10.0 million in the aggregate with Cleco Holdings’ similar line of credit, to support their working capital needs.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power’s long-term debt and finance leases outstanding was $1.50 billion, of which $0.7 million was due within one year. Long-term debt increased $114.0 million from December 31, 2019, primarily due to the $125.0 million term loan agreement entered into on August 28, 2020, partially offset by the $11.1 million final principal payment made on the Cleco Katrina/Rita storm recovery bonds on March 2, 2020.
On August 28, 2020, Cleco Power entered into a $125.0 million variable rate bank term loan due on June 28, 2022. Proceeds from the term loan will be used to fund capital expenditures and working capital requirements for Cleco Power and other general corporate purposes. For more information on Cleco Power’s debt, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 9 — Debt.”
Cash and cash equivalents available at December 31, 2020, were $24.8 million combined with $225.0 million available revolving credit facility capacity for total liquidity of $249.8 million.
At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco Power had a working capital surplus of $13.4 million and $33.5 million, respectively. The $20.1 million decrease in working capital is primarily due to:
•a $75.0 million increase in short-term debt due to a draw on the revolving credit facility,
•a $57.9 million increase in affiliate accounts payable,
•a $30.6 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents, and
•a $16.8 million increase in regulatory liabilities primarily due to the reclassification of the short-term portion of the regulatory liability related to the TCJA, partially offset by credits to customers for the TCJA refunds and the absence of over collections of revenue from the delay of the St. Mary Clean Energy Center project.
These decreases in working capital were partially offset by:
•a $60.9 million decrease in long-term debt due within one year primarily due to the long-term refinancing of $50.0 million 2008 series A GO Zone bonds and the $11.1 million final principal payment on the Cleco Katrina/Rita storm recovery bonds on March 2, 2020,
•a $34.1 million decrease in taxes payable primarily due to intercompany tax settlements, partially offset by higher provisions for income taxes,
•a $29.6 million decrease in provision for rate refund primarily due to refunds to customers for tax-related benefits of the TCJA,
•a $13.4 million increase in material and supplies inventory primarily due to higher purchases for storm restoration and other projects,
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
•a $6.9 million increase in unbilled revenue primarily due to higher usage as a result of colder weather, and
•a $6.7 million increase in accumulated deferred fuel, excluding FTRs, primarily due to the timing of collections and additional deferrals through a fuel surcharge.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets reflected $2.96 billion of total liabilities compared to $2.76 billion at December 31, 2019. The $195.1 million increase in total liabilities during 2020 was primarily due to:
•an increase in total long-term debt of $114.0 million, as previously discussed,
•an increase in short-term debt of $75.0 million due to a draw on the revolving credit facility,
•an increase in affiliate accounts payable of $57.9 million,
•an increase in net deferred taxes regulatory liabilities of $28.6 million primarily due to temporary tax differences and adjustments to tax returns as filed, partially offset by the amortization of excess ADIT related to the TCJA, and
•an increase in postretirement benefit obligations of $24.6 million primarily due to lower discount rates.
These increases in total liabilities were partially offset by:
•a decrease in taxes payable of $34.1 million as a result of intercompany tax settlements, partially offset by higher provisions for income taxes,
•a decrease in provision for rate refund of $29.6 million primarily due to refunds to customers for tax-related benefits of the TCJA,
•a decrease in accumulated deferred federal and state income taxes, net of $23.2 million, and
•a decrease in restricted storm reserve of $12.3 million primarily due to storm costs.
Credit Facilities
At December 31, 2020, Cleco had two separate revolving credit facilities, one for Cleco Holdings in the amount of $175.0 million with no outstanding borrowings and one for Cleco Power in the amount of $300.0 million with outstanding borrowings of $75.0 million. The total of all revolving credit facilities creates a maximum aggregate capacity of $475.0 million with outstanding borrowings of $75.0 million.
Cleco Holdings’ revolving credit facility provides for working capital and other financing needs. The revolving credit facility includes restrictive financial covenants and expires in June 2022. Under covenants contained in Cleco Holdings’ revolving credit facility, Cleco is required to maintain total indebtedness less than or equal to 65% of total capitalization. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Holdings was in compliance with the covenants of its revolving credit facility. The borrowing costs under the facility are equal to LIBOR plus 1.875% or ABR plus 0.875%, plus commitment fees of 0.30%. If Cleco Holdings’ credit ratings were to be downgraded one level by the credit rating agencies, Cleco Holdings may be required to pay higher fees and additional interest of 0.50% under the pricing levels of its revolving credit facility.
Cleco Power’s revolving credit facility provides for working capital and other financing needs. The revolving credit facility includes restrictive financial covenants and expires in June 2022. Under covenants contained in Cleco Power’s revolving credit facility, Cleco Power is required to maintain total
indebtedness less than or equal to 65% of total capitalization. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power was in compliance with the covenants of its revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2020, the borrowing costs under the facility were equal to LIBOR plus 1.25% or ABR plus 0.25%, plus commitment fees of 0.15%. If Cleco Power’s credit ratings were to be downgraded one level by the credit rating agencies, Cleco Power may be required to pay higher fees and additional interest of 0.125% under the pricing levels of its revolving credit facility.
If Cleco Holdings or Cleco Power were to default under the covenants in their respective revolving credit facilities or other debt agreements, they would be unable to borrow additional funds under the facilities, and the lenders could accelerate all principal and interest outstanding. Further, if Cleco Power were to default under its revolving credit facility or other debt agreements, Cleco Holdings would be considered in default under its revolving credit facility.
Debt and Distribution Limitations
The 2016 Merger Commitments include provisions for limiting the amount of distributions that can be made from Cleco Holdings to Cleco Group, depending on Cleco Holdings’ debt to EBITDA ratio and its corporate credit ratings. Cleco Holdings may not make any distribution unless, after giving effect to such distribution, Cleco Holdings’ debt to EBITDA ratio is equal to or less than 6.50 to 1.00 and Cleco Holdings’ corporate credit rating is investment grade with one or more of the three credit rating agencies. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Holdings was in compliance with the provisions of the 2016 Merger Commitments that would restrict the amount of distributions available. Additionally, in accordance with the 2016 Merger Commitments, Cleco Power is subject to certain provisions limiting the amount of distributions that may be paid to Cleco Holdings, depending on Cleco Power’s common equity ratio and its corporate credit ratings. Cleco Power may not make any distribution unless, after giving effect to such distribution, Cleco Power’s common equity ratio would not be less than 48% and Cleco Power’s corporate credit rating is investment grade with two of the three credit rating agencies. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power was in compliance with the provisions of the 2016 Merger Commitments that would restrict the amount of distributions available. The 2016 Merger Commitments also prohibit Cleco from incurring additional long-term debt, excluding non-recourse debt, unless certain financial ratios are achieved. For more information on the 2016 Merger Commitments, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Structural Risks — Holding Company” and “— Regulatory Risks — Regulatory Compliance.”
Cleco Cash Flows
Net Operating Cash Flow
Internally generated cash from operating activities consists of net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses, non-cash income, and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Non-cash items include depreciation and amortization, deferred fuel costs, deferred income taxes, and allowance for equity funds used during construction. Cash provided by operating activities for Cleco may vary year to year primarily as a result of the cash provided by operating activities at Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun. Changes in Cleco Power’s cash provided by operating activities are discussed below. Cleco Cajun’s cash provided by operating activities may vary year to year primarily
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
as a result of changes in wholesale contracts, cost of fuel and purchased power, and costs for generation station operations and maintenance.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $205.8 million and $430.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities during 2020 decreased $224.3 million from 2019 primarily due to:
•higher payments for non-capital hurricane and storm restoration costs of $75.0 million at Cleco Power,
•lower collections from Cleco Power customers of $43.0 million due to the rate refund for tax-related benefits from the TCJA, which began being credited to customers in August 2019,
•higher payments for fuel inventory of $27.9 million primarily due to higher gas purchases, higher solid fuel purchases, and higher per unit lignite costs,
•lower Cleco Katrina/Rita storm restoration surcharge collections from Cleco Power customers of $18.6 million as a result of the final principal and interest payment on the Cleco Katrina/Rita bonds in March 2020,
•lower net fuel and purchased power collections at Cleco Power of $15.3 million primarily due to the timing of collections,
•higher payments for transmission and distribution inventory of $10.9 million at Cleco Power,
•higher payments for purchases of power of $7.5 million primarily due to the closing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction in February 2019, and
•higher payments for employee benefits of $7.1 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities during 2019 increased $112.3 million from 2018 primarily due to:
•$124.0 million for the addition of Cleco Cajun operations, including receipts of $37.7 million as a result of the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback,
•higher net fuel and purchased power collections at Cleco Power of $29.7 million primarily due to the timing of collections, and
•lower payments for fuel purchases of $18.6 million primarily due to lower purchases of petroleum coke at Cleco Power.
These increases were partially offset by:
•payments for pension plan contributions of $12.3 million at Cleco Power,
•lower receipts of $8.6 million, primarily due to the timing of receipts of Cleco Power’s joint owners’ portion of generating stations expenditures,
•lower Cleco Power customer deposits of $7.9 million, and
•higher interest paid on long-term debt at Cleco Holdings of $6.8 million primarily as a result of additional borrowings to finance the Cleco Cajun Transaction.
Net Investing Cash Flow
Net cash used in investing activities was $377.9 million and $1.12 billion for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities decreased $737.5 million primarily due to the absence of payment for the Cleco Cajun Transaction of $962.2 million, partially offset by cash received of $147.2 million. This
decrease was partially offset by higher additions to property, plant, and equipment, net of AFUDC, of $80.6 million.
Net cash used in investing activities during 2019 increased $827.2 million from 2018 primarily due to:
•payment for the acquisition of all the membership interest in South Central Generating of $962.2 million, partially offset by cash received of $147.2 million and
•higher additions to property, plant, and equipment, net of AFUDC, of $31.5 million.
These increases were partially offset by the absence of the issuance of a $16.8 million note receivable.
Net Financing Cash Flow
Net cash provided by financing activities was $119.8 million and $687.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $568.0 million during 2020 primarily due to:
•the absence of borrowings of $400.0 million related to the financing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction,
•absence of contributions from Cleco Group of $384.9 million,
•the absence of issuance of $300.0 million principal amount of senior notes at Cleco Holdings, and
•higher payments on revolving credit facilities of $55.0 million.
These decreases were partially offset by:
•lower repayments of long-term debt of $315.5 million,
•higher draws on revolving credit facilities of $130.0 million, and
•the borrowing of a $125.0 million term loan at Cleco Power in August 2020.
Net cash provided by financing activities during 2019 increased $729.5 million from 2018 primarily due to:
•borrowings of $400.0 million related to the financing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction,
•higher contributions from Cleco Group of $384.9 million,
•the issuance of $300.0 million principal amount of senior notes at Cleco Holdings, and
•the absence of distributions to Cleco Group of $71.4 million.
These increases were partially offset by:
•higher repayments of long-term debt of $371.4 million and
•the absence of the issuance of $50.0 million principal amount of senior notes in March 2018 at Cleco Power.
Cleco Power Cash Flows
Net Operating Cash Flow
Internally generated cash from operating activities consists of net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses, non-cash income, and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Non-cash items include depreciation and amortization, deferred fuel costs, deferred income taxes, and allowance for equity funds used during construction. Cash provided by operating activities for Cleco Power may vary year to year primarily as a result of the impact of rate cases, weather, timing of fuel and
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
purchased power collections, and costs for generation operations and maintenance.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $127.8 million and $352.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities during 2020 decreased $224.7 million from 2019 primarily due to:
•higher payments for non-capital hurricane and storm restoration costs of $75.0 million,
•lower collections from customers of $43.0 million due to the rate refund for the tax-related benefits from the TCJA, which began being credited to customers in August 2019,
•higher payments to vendors of $28.9 million primarily due to timing of vendor payments related to other operating and maintenance activities,
•lower Cleco Katrina/Rita storm restoration surcharge collections from customers of $18.6 million as a result of the final principal and interest payment on the Cleco Katrina/Rita bonds in March 2020,
•lower net fuel and purchased power collections of $15.3 million primarily due to the timing of collections,
•higher payments for transmission and distribution inventory of $10.9 million, and
•higher payout for employee benefits of $3.3 million.
These decreases in net operating cash were partially offset by lower payments for affiliate settlements of $37.9 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities during 2019 increased $12.8 million from 2018 primarily due to:
•higher net fuel and power purchase collections of $29.7 million primarily due to the timing of collections,
•lower payments for fuel purchases of $18.6 million primarily due to lower purchases of petroleum coke, and
•lower payments for employee benefits of $7.8 million.
These increases in net operating cash were partially offset by:
•higher payments for affiliate settlements of $23.6 million,
•payments for pension plan contributions of $12.3 million, and
•lower receipts for other accounts receivable of $8.6 million, primarily due to the timing of receipts of joint owners’ portion of generating station expenditures.
Net Investing Cash Flow
Net cash used in investing activities was $365.9 million and $292.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities during 2020 increased $73.6 million from 2019 primarily due to higher additions to property, plant, and equipment, net of AFUDC, of $78.5 million. This increase was partially offset by higher returns on equity investment in investee of $6.9 million.
Net cash used in investing activities during 2019 increased $3.3 million from 2018 primarily due to higher additions to property, plant, and equipment, net of AFUDC, of $23.6 million. This increase was partially offset by the absence of the issuance of a $16.8 million note receivable.
Net Financing Cash Flow
Net cash provided by financing activities was $186.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Net cash used in financing activities was $41.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Net cash provided by financing activities during 2020 increased $227.8 million from 2019 primarily due to:
•the borrowing of a $125.0 million term loan in August 2020,
•higher draws on revolving credit facilities of $117.0 million, and
•lower repayments of long-term debt of $9.5 million.
These increases were partially offset by higher payments on revolving credit facilities of $42.0 million.
Net cash used in financing activities during 2019 decreased $50.5 million from 2018 primarily due to lower distributions to Cleco Holdings of $101.4 million. This decrease was partially offset by the absence of the issuance of $50.0 million principal amount of senior notes in March 2018.
Capital Expenditures
Cleco’s capital expenditures are primarily incurred at Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun. Cleco Power’s capital expenditures relate primarily to assets that may be included in Cleco Power’s rate base and, if considered prudent by the LPSC, can be recovered from its customers. Those assets also earn a rate of return authorized by the LPSC and are subject to the FRP. Such assets primarily consist of improvements to Cleco Power’s distribution system, transmission system, and generating stations as well as hardware and software upgrades. Cleco Cajun’s capital expenditures primarily consist of improvements to Cleco Cajun’s transmission system and generating stations as well as hardware and software upgrades.
During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, Cleco Power had capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC, of $377.0 million, $298.6 million, and $275.0 million, respectively. In 2020, 2019, and 2018, 100% of Cleco Power’s capital expenditure requirements were funded internally.
During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, other subsidiaries had capital expenditures, excluding capitalized interest, of $12.0 million, $9.8 million, and $1.9 million, respectively. The higher capital expenditures in 2020 and 2019 were primarily due to the addition of Cleco Cajun’s capital expenditures.
In 2021 and for the five-year period ending 2025, Cleco and Cleco Power expect to materially fund its capital expenditure requirements with internally generated funds. However, Cleco Power may choose to issue debt in order to supplement its funding sources and achieve its stipulated regulatory capital structure. All computations of internally funded capital expenditures exclude AFUDC and capitalized interest.
Cleco and Cleco Power’s estimated capital expenditures and debt maturities for 2021 and for the five-year period ending December 31, 2025 are presented in the following tables. All amounts exclude AFUDC and capitalized interest.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | | | |
PROJECT (THOUSANDS) | 2021 | | % | | 2021-2025 | | % |
Environmental | $ | — | | | — | % | | $ | 97,000 | | | 6 | % |
New business | 18,000 | | | 5 | % | | 84,000 | | | 5 | % |
Transmission reliability | 73,000 | | | 21 | % | | 92,000 | | | 5 | % |
Fuel optimization | 34,000 | | | 10 | % | | 385,000 | | | 22 | % |
General (1) | 215,000 | | | 64 | % | | 1,078,000 | | | 62 | % |
Total capital expenditures | $ | 340,000 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 1,736,000 | | | 100 | % |
Debt payments | 66,000 | | (2) | | | 806,000 | | | |
Total capital expenditures and debt payments | $ | 406,000 | | | | | $ | 2,542,000 | | | |
(1) Primarily consists of rehabilitation projects of older transmission, distribution, and generation assets and hardware and software upgrades at Cleco Power. (2) Consists of the principal amount committed to be repaid as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction. There are no long-term debt obligations with a maturity date in 2021. For more information on the committed principal amount, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 9 — Debt.” |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | | | |
PROJECT (THOUSANDS) | 2021 | | % | | 2021-2025 | | % |
Environmental | $ | — | | | — | % | | $ | 97,000 | | | 6 | % |
New business | 18,000 | | | 6 | % | | 84,000 | | | 5 | % |
Transmission reliability | 73,000 | | | 23 | % | | 92,000 | | | 6 | % |
Fuel optimization | 34,000 | | | 11 | % | | 385,000 | | | 23 | % |
General (1) | 197,000 | | | 60 | % | | 993,000 | | | 60 | % |
Total capital expenditures | $ | 322,000 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 1,651,000 | | | 100 | % |
Debt payments | — | | | | | 375,000 | | | |
Total capital expenditures and debt payments | $ | 322,000 | | | | | $ | 2,026,000 | | | |
(1) Primarily consists of rehabilitation projects of older transmission, distribution, and generation assets and hardware and software upgrades. |
Capital expenditures for other subsidiaries, including Cleco Cajun, in 2021 are estimated to total $18.0 million. For
the five-year period ending December 31, 2025, capital expenditures for other subsidiaries, including Cleco Cajun, are estimated to total $85.0 million. Cleco expects cash and cash equivalents on hand in addition to cash generated from operations, borrowings from credit facilities, and the net proceeds of any issuances of debt securities to be adequate to fund normal ongoing capital expenditures, working capital, and debt service requirements for the foreseeable future.
Other Cash Requirements
Cleco Power’s regulated operations and Cleco Cajun unregulated operations are Cleco’s primary sources of internally generated funds. These funds, along with the issuance of additional debt in future years, will be used for general company purposes, capital expenditures, debt service, human capital expenditures, contractual obligations, and off-balance sheet arrangements, if required.
Contractual Obligations
Cleco, in the course of normal business activities, enters into a variety of contractual obligations. Some of these result in direct obligations that are reflected in Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheets while others are commitments, some firm and some based on uncertainties, that are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The obligations listed in the following table do not include amounts for ongoing needs for which no contractual obligation existed as of December 31, 2020, and represent only the projected future payments that Cleco was contractually obligated to make as of December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD | | | | |
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS (THOUSANDS) | TOTAL | | UP TO 12 MONTHS | | BEYOND 12 MONTHS | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt (1) | $ | 4,817,444 | | | $ | 201,409 | | | $ | 4,616,035 | | | | | |
Finance lease (2) | 31,487 | | | 2,611 | | | 28,876 | | | | | |
Operating lease | 32,117 | | | 3,682 | | | 28,435 | | | | | |
Purchase | 138,095 | | | 74,435 | | | 63,660 | | | | | |
Other long-term liabilities (3) | 24,341 | | | 5,878 | | | 18,463 | | | | | |
Postretirement benefits | 266,491 | | | 9,279 | | | 257,212 | | | | | |
Total Cleco | $ | 5,309,975 | | | $ | 297,294 | | | $ | 5,012,681 | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt (1) | $ | 2,552,412 | | | $ | 142,095 | | | $ | 2,410,317 | | | | | |
Finance lease (2) | 31,487 | | | 2,611 | | | 28,876 | | | | | |
Operating lease | 31,899 | | | 3,543 | | | 28,356 | | | | | |
Purchase | 104,850 | | | 50,994 | | | 53,856 | | | | | |
Other long-term liabilities (3) | 9,000 | | | 1,800 | | | 7,200 | | | | | |
Postretirement benefits | 53,500 | | | — | | | 53,500 | | | | | |
Total Cleco Power | $ | 2,783,148 | | | $ | 201,043 | | | $ | 2,582,105 | | | | | |
(1) For Cleco, the amount above excludes the fair value adjustments related to the 2016 Merger. Cleco’s and Cleco Power’s anticipated interest payments related to long-term debt also are included in this category and do not reflect anticipated future refinancing, early redemption, or debt issuance.
(2) Cleco’s anticipated interest payments and operating fees related to the finance lease obligation are included in this category.
(3) Other long-term liabilities primarily consist of obligations for deferred compensation and various operating and maintenance agreements.
For purposes of this table, it is assumed that all terms and rates related to the above obligations will remain the same and all franchises will be renewed according to the rates used in the table.
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments and On-Balance Sheet Guarantees
Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power have entered into various off-balance sheet commitments in the form of guarantees and standby letters of credit in order to facilitate their activities and the activities of Cleco Holdings’ subsidiaries and equity investees (affiliates). Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power have
also agreed to contractual terms that require them to pay third parties if certain triggering events occur. These contractual terms generally are defined as guarantees. For more information about off-balance sheet commitments and on-balance sheet guarantees, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
— Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Off-Balance Sheet Commitments and Guarantees.”
Cybersecurity
The operation of Cleco’s electrical systems relies on evolving operational and information technology systems and network infrastructures that are complex. The failure of Cleco or its vendors’ operational and information technology systems and networks due to a physical attack or cyberattack, or other event could significantly disrupt operations; cause harm to the public or employees; result in outages or reduced generating output; result in damage to Cleco’s assets or operations, or those of third parties; result in damage to Cleco’s reputation; and subject Cleco to claims by customers or third parties, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants. Cleco continues to assess its cybersecurity tools and processes and has taken a variety of actions to monitor and address cyber-related risks. Cleco’s Chief Information and Supply Chain Officer leads Cleco’s cybersecurity team and oversees Cleco’s cybersecurity maturity plan. Each month, management provides cybersecurity updates to Cleco’s Asset Management Committee. On December 13, 2020, Cleco’s third party provider publicly confirmed a breach of its monitoring products in which a vulnerability was inserted and, if present and activated, could potentially allow an attacker to compromise the server on which the products run. Although Cleco has found no impact to the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of data or systems to date, the incident is still under investigation by the third party provider. Cleco will continue to evaluate the impact to its data and systems as new information becomes available. For more information on risks related to Cleco’s cybersecurity, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — Technology and Terrorism Threats.”
Regulatory and Other Matters
Environmental Matters
For information on environmental matters, see Part I, Item 1, “Business — Environmental Matters.”
Retail Rates of Cleco Power
For 2020 and 2019, retail rates, which includes the retail portion of FAC and EAC revenue, regulated by the LPSC accounted for approximately 86% of Cleco Power’s total base, FAC, and EAC revenue.
Fuel Rates
Generally, Cleco Power’s cost of fuel used for electric generation and the cost of purchased power are recovered through the LPSC-established FAC that enables Cleco Power to pass on to its customers substantially all such charges. Recovery of FAC costs is subject to periodic fuel audits by the LPSC. For more information on the FAC and the most recent fuel audit, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — LPSC Audits — Fuel Audit.”
Environmental Rates
In July 2009, the LPSC issued Docket No. U-29380 Subdocket A, which provides Cleco Power an EAC to recover from
customers certain costs of environmental compliance. These expenses are eligible for recovery through Cleco Power’s EAC and are subject to periodic review by the LPSC. For more information on the EAC and the most recent environmental audit, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — LPSC Audits — Environmental Audit.”
Base Rates
Cleco Power’s annual retail earnings are subject to an FRP that was approved by the LPSC in June 2014. For more information on the LPSC’s regulation of Cleco Power’s base rates, see Part I, Item 1, “Business — Regulatory Matters, Industry Developments, and Franchises — Rates.”
For more information on the regulatory impacts of the TCJA on Cleco Power and the LPSC Staff’s FRP reviews, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 13 — Regulation and Rates — TCJA” and “— FRP.”
SSR
In September 2016, Cleco Power filed an Attachment Y with MISO requesting retirement of Teche Unit 3 effective April 1, 2017. MISO conducted a study which determined the proposed retirement of Teche Unit 3 would result in violations of specific applicable reliability standards for which no mitigation is available. As a result, MISO designated Teche Unit 3 as an SSR unit, until such time that an appropriate alternative solution could be implemented to mitigate reliability issues. Cleco Power received a termination notice, effective April 30, 2019, and filed paperwork to withdraw the filed Attachment Y. For more information on the MISO SSR designation of Teche Unit 3, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 13 — Regulation and Rates — SSR.”
Energy Efficiency
In 2013, the LPSC issued a General Order adopting rules promoting energy efficiency programs. Cleco Power began participating in energy efficiency programs in November 2014. Cleco Power has recovered approximately $3.3 million annually for each of the program years through an approved rate tariff. In January 2018, Cleco began recovering an additional $3.3 million annually for estimated costs related to programs specific to political subdivisions.
On December 17, 2019, the LPSC initiated an audit on program years three and four to consider all program costs. Cleco Power responded to several sets of data requests regarding the audit. In October 2020, a preliminary report was received by Cleco Power with no material findings. The LPSC approved the audit report in November 2020. Program year five and program years thereafter are still subject to be audited. Management is unable to predict or give a reasonable estimate of the outcome of the audit.
Generally utility companies are allowed to recover from customers the accumulated decrease in revenues associated with the energy efficiency programs. On October 21, 2019, Cleco Power received notice of approval from the LPSC allowing recovery of the accumulated LCFC revenues until such a time that base rates reset, which is expected in the first half of 2021.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Wholesale Rates
The rates Cleco, through Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun, charges its wholesale customers are subject to FERC’s triennial market power analysis. FERC requires a utility to pass a screening test as a condition for securing and/or retaining approval to sell electricity in wholesale markets at market-based rates. An updated market power analysis must be filed with FERC every three years or upon the occurrence of a change in status as defined by FERC regulation. Cleco filed its most recent triennial market power analysis on December 23, 2020.
Transmission Rates
In July 2011, FERC issued Order No. 1000 that reformed the electric transmission planning and cost allocation requirements for public utility transmission providers. The rule builds on the reforms of Order No. 890 and corrects remaining deficiencies with respect to transmission planning processes and cost allocation methods. In 2015, MISO and the Southwest Power Pool made separate filings containing different metrics to meet specific requirements. A compliance determination for both filings has not been made and no timetable is available for when a determination will be made. Until a determination is made, Cleco is unable to determine if this order will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun’s generation dispatch and transmission operations are integrated with MISO. MISO operates a fully functioning RTO market with two major market processes: the Day-Ahead Energy and Operating Reserves Market and the Real-Time Energy and Operating Reserves Market. Both use market-based mechanisms to manage transmission congestion across the MISO market area. For more information about the risks associated with Cleco’s participation in MISO, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Regulatory Risks — MISO.”
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun earn transmission revenues pursuant to MISO’s FERC filed tariff. The performance obligation of transmission service is satisfied as service is provided. Revenue is recognized upon delivery of the transmission service. For Cleco Power, revenue from the transmission of electricity is recorded based on a FERC-approved annual formula rate mechanism. This mechanism provides for an annual filing of revenue requirements with rates effective June 1 of each year. For Cleco Cajun, revenue from the transmission of electricity is recorded based on a FERC-approved annual filing rate mechanism effective June 1 of each year. Cleco Cajun charges transmission rates based on its cost to provide transmission services.
Two complaints were filed with FERC seeking to reduce the ROE component of the transmission rates that MISO transmission owners, including Cleco, may collect under the MISO tariff. For more information about the ROE complaints, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — Transmission ROE.”
Transmission and Distribution Projects
Cleco Power’s significant ongoing projects include the Bayou Vista to Segura transmission project and the DSMART distribution project. For information on these projects, see “— Overview — Cleco Power.”
Market Restructuring
Wholesale Electric Markets
RTO
In 1999, FERC issued Order No. 2000, which established a general framework for all transmission-owning entities in the nation to voluntarily place their transmission facilities under the control of an appropriate RTO. Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun’s generation dispatch and transmission operations are integrated with MISO. For more information about Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun’s integration into MISO, see “— Transmission Rates.”
ERO
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 added Section 215 to the Federal Power Act, which provides for a uniform system of mandatory, enforceable reliability standards. In 2006, FERC named NERC as the ERO that will be required to develop and enforce the mandatory reliability standards.
A NERC Reliability Standards audit is conducted every three years for Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun. The next NERC Reliability Standards audit for Cleco Power is scheduled to begin in 2023. The next NERC Reliability Standards audit for Cleco Cajun is scheduled to begin in 2022.
A NERC CIP audit is also conducted every three years for Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun. Cleco Power’s current NERC CIP audit was completed on August 14, 2020, and the final report was issued by SERC on November 5, 2020. Cleco Cajun’s most recent CIP audit occurred during June 2019, and the final report was issued by SERC on June 27, 2019. Management is unable to determine the timing of NERC’s approval of the final reports.
Management is also unable to predict the final financial outcome of the most recent CIP audits, any future audits, or whether any findings will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants. For a discussion of risks associated with FERC’s regulation of Cleco Power’s transmission system, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Regulatory Risks — Reliability and CIP Standards Compliance.”
Retail Electric Markets
Currently, the LPSC does not provide exclusive service territories for electric utilities under its jurisdiction. Instead, retail service is obtained through a long-term nonexclusive franchise. The LPSC uses a “300-foot rule” for determining the supplier for new customers. The “300-foot rule” requires a customer to take service from the electric utility that is within 300 feet of the respective customer. If the customer is beyond 300 feet from any existing utility service, they may choose their electric supplier. The LPSC’s review of the “300-foot rule” in Docket No. R-32763 has been ongoing since April 2013. On February 5, 2020, the docket was closed due to no substantive actions in the proceedings since October 2014. Management is unable to predict if this docket will be reopened for reconsideration in the future and cannot determine the impact any potential rulemaking may have on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of Cleco Power. The application of the current rule has led to competition with neighboring utilities for retail customers at the borders of Cleco Power’s service areas. Cleco Power also competes in its service area with suppliers of alternative forms of energy, some of which may be less costly than electricity for certain
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
applications. Cleco Power could experience some competition for electric sales to industrial customers in the form of cogeneration or from independent power producers.
Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
In accordance with the General Order in LPSC Docket No. R-30021, in October 2017, Cleco Power filed a request with the LPSC to initiate an IRP process. In February 2018, Cleco Power filed the data assumptions to be used in its IRP analysis. The IRP process includes conducting stakeholder meetings and receiving feedback from stakeholders. LPSC acknowledgment of a completed IRP process was received with no objections or discussions on January 22, 2020.
The IRP report describes how Cleco Power plans to meet its forecasted load requirements on a reliable and economic basis. The IRP is used as a guide in future decision-making and does not represent firm operational commitments. LPSC acknowledgment of a completed IRP process does not represent approval of any actions stated in the IRP report.
Service Quality Plan (SQP)
In October 2015, the LPSC proposed an SQP containing 21 requirements for Cleco Power. The SQP has provisions relating
to employee headcount, customer service, reliability, vegetation management, and reporting. In April 2016, the SQP was approved by the LPSC. The SQP expired on December 31, 2020. Cleco Power has not submitted a new five-year program to the LPSC for approval. Cleco Power filed its annual SQP monitoring report on March 27, 2020.
Franchises
For information on franchises, see Part I, Item 1, “Business — Regulatory Matters, Industry Developments, and Franchises — Franchises.”
Recent Authoritative Guidance
For a discussion of recent authoritative guidance, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Recent Authoritative Guidance.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Cleco is exposed to counterparty credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, and commodity price risk. Cleco has implemented a governance framework, inclusive of risk policies and procedures to help manage these and other risks.
Counterparty Credit Risks
When Cleco enters into bilateral commodity derivative or physical commodity transactions, Cleco may be exposed to counterparty credit risk. Cleco is exposed to counterparty credit risk when a counterparty fails to meet their financial obligations causing Cleco to incur replacement cost losses.
Cleco monitors and manages its credit risk exposure through credit risk management policies and procedures that include:
•routine review of counterparty credit quality and credit exposure,
•entering into industry standard master agreements with specific terms and conditions for credit exposure and non-performance,
•measuring expected and potential future exposure regularly, and
•exchanging guarantees or forms of cash equivalent collateral for financial assurance.
For more information, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Liquidity and Capital Resources — General Considerations and Credit-Related Risks.”
Liquidity Risks
Access to capital markets is a significant source of funding for both short- and long-term capital requirements not satisfied by
operating cash flows. Future actions or inactions of the federal government, including a failure to increase the government debt limit, could increase the actual or perceived risk that the U.S. may not pay its obligations when due and may disrupt financial markets, including capital markets, potentially limiting availability and increasing costs of capital. The inability to raise capital on favorable terms could negatively affect Cleco’s ability to maintain and expand its businesses. After assessing the current operating performance, liquidity, and credit ratings of Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power, management believes that Cleco will have access to the capital markets at prevailing market rates for companies with comparable credit ratings. Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power pay fees and interest under their respective credit facilities based on the highest rating held. For more information, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Liquidity and Capital Resources — General Considerations and Credit-Related Risks.”
Interest Rate Risks
Cleco monitors its mix of fixed- and variable-rate debt obligations in light of changing market conditions and from time to time may alter that mix, for example, refinancing balances outstanding under its variable-rate revolving credit facility with fixed-rate debt. Calculations of the changes in fair market value and interest expense of the debt securities are made over a one-year period.
Sensitivity to changes in interest rates for variable-rate obligations is computed by assuming a 1% change in the current interest rate applicable to such debt.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Holdings had no short-term debt outstanding under its $175.0 million revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2020, the borrowing costs under Cleco Holdings’ revolving credit facility were equal to LIBOR plus 1.875% or ABR plus 0.875%, plus commitment fees of 0.30%.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Holdings had a $266.0 million long-term variable rate bank term loan outstanding at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.875%, for an all-in interest rate of 2.025%. Each 1% increase in the interest rate applicable to Cleco Holdings’ long-term variable rate debt would result in a decrease in Cleco Holdings’ pretax earnings of $2.7 million on an annualized basis. The weighted average rate for the outstanding term loan debt at Cleco Holdings for the year ended December 31, 2020, was 2.29%.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $75.0 million of short-term debt outstanding under its $300.0 million revolving credit facility at an all-in interest rate of 1.40%. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power’s borrowing costs under its $300.0 million revolving credit facility were equal to LIBOR plus 1.25% or ABR plus 0.25%, plus commitment fees of 0.15%.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had a $125.0 million long-term variable rate bank term loan outstanding, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25%, for an all-in interest rate of 1.40%. Each 1% increase in the interest rate applicable to Cleco Power’s short- and long-term variable rate debt would result in a decrease in Cleco Power’s pretax earnings of $2.0 million on an annualized basis. The weighted average rate for the outstanding term loan debt at Cleco Power for the year ended December 31, 2020, was 1.41%.
Each 1% increase in the interest rate applicable to Cleco’s short- and long-term variable rate debt would result in a decrease in Cleco’s pretax earnings of $4.7 million on an annualized basis.
Cleco may enter into contracts to mitigate the volatility in interest rate risk. These contracts include, but are not limited to, interest rate swaps and treasury rate locks. For each reporting period presented, the Registrants did not enter into any contracts to mitigate the volatility in interest rate risk.
Commodity Price Risks
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun’s financial performance can be impacted by changes in commodity prices that impact fuel costs, generation revenues, and customer supply costs and revenue. Cleco’s Energy Market Risk Management Policy authorizes hedging commodity price risk with physical or financially settled derivative instruments within approved guidelines and limits of authority. Some of these transactions may qualify for the normal purchase, normal sale (NPNS) exception under derivative accounting guidance. Contracts that do not qualify for NPNS accounting treatment or are not elected for NPNS accounting treatment are marked-to-market and recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value.
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun, individually, may be exposed to transmission congestion price risk as a result of physical transmission constraints present between MISO LMP nodes when serving customer load. Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun are awarded and/or purchase FTRs in auctions facilitated by MISO. FTRs are accounted for as derivatives not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes.
During 2020, Cleco Cajun entered into gas-related derivative contracts including fixed price physical forwards and financially settled swap transactions. These are included in other commodity derivatives in the following tables.
The following tables present the fair values of derivative instruments and their respective line items as recorded on
Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | |
| DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS |
(THOUSANDS) | BALANCE SHEET LINE ITEM | AT DEC. 31, 2020 |
Commodity-related contracts | |
FTRs | | |
Current | Energy risk management assets | $ | 4,805 | |
Current | Energy risk management liabilities | (1,625) | |
Other commodity derivatives | |
Current | Energy risk management assets | 8,276 | |
Non-current | Other deferred charges | 323 | |
Current | Energy risk management liabilities | (828) | |
Non-current | Other deferred credits | (784) | |
Commodity-related contracts, net | $ | 10,167 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | |
| DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS |
(THOUSANDS) | BALANCE SHEET LINE ITEM | AT DEC. 31, 2020 |
Commodity-related contracts | |
FTRs | | |
Current | Energy risk management assets | $ | 4,337 | |
Current | Energy risk management liabilities | (1,121) | |
Commodity-related contracts, net | $ | 3,216 | |
Cleco monitors the Value at Risk (VaR) of its other commodity derivative contracts requiring derivative accounting treatment. Cleco applies a portfolio VaR covariance analytical approach within a 5-day holding period at a 95% confidence interval. VaR is defined as the minimum expected loss over a given holding period at a given confidence level based on observable market price volatilities.
The following table presents the VaR of other commodity derivative contracts for 2020, as well as the VaR at December 31, 2020, based on these assumptions:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2020 |
(THOUSANDS) | AT DEC. 31, 2020 | | HIGH | | LOW | | AVERAGE |
Cleco | $ | 7,138 | | | $ | 7,879 | | | $ | 3,425 | | | $ | 5,451 | |
For more information on the accounting treatment and fair value of FTRs and other commodity derivatives, see Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Derivatives and Other Risk Management Activity” and “Note 8 — Fair Value Accounting — Commodity Contracts.”
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
To the Board of Managers and Member of
Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of changes in member’s equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, including the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases as of January 1, 2019.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of
the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Goodwill Impairment Assessment – Cleco Power reporting unit
As described in Note 2 and Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated goodwill balance was $1.49 billion at December 31, 2020, all of which was assigned to the Cleco Power Reporting Unit. Management conducts an impairment test as of August 1 of each year, or more often if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Fair value is estimated by management using a weighted combination of the income approach, which estimates fair value based on discounted cash flows, and the market approach, which estimates fair value based on market comparables within the utility and energy industries. Significant assumptions used in these fair value estimates include estimation of future cash flows related to capital expenditures, long-term rate of growth, and weighted-average cost of capital or discount rate.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the goodwill impairment assessment of the Cleco Power reporting unit is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the fair value measurement of the reporting unit; (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to capital expenditures, long-term rate of growth, and discount rate; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for developing the fair value estimate; (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model; (iii) testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in the model; and (iv) evaluating the significant assumptions used by management relating to
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
capital expenditures, long-term rate of growth, and discount rate. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to the capital expenditures and projected long-term rate of growth involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering, as applicable, (i) the current and past performance of the reporting unit, (ii) the consistency with external market and modeled rate base changes, and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the Company’s discounted cash flow model and the long-term rate of growth and discount rate assumptions.
Accounting for the Effects of Regulatory Matters
As described in Notes 2 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, Cleco Power complies with the accounting policies and practices prescribed by its regulatory commissions, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Louisiana Public Service Commission (LPSC). Cleco Power’s retail rates are regulated by the LPSC and its tariffs for transmission services are regulated by FERC, while rates for wholesale power sales are based on market-based rates and are ultimately reviewed by FERC. Cleco Power must evaluate its various transactions related to regulatory orders and accounting guidance to ensure the appropriate timing of revenue recognition, the evaluation of cost deferral and the recoverability and refund of certain assets. Cleco Power capitalizes or defers certain costs for recovery from customers and recognizes a liability for amounts expected to be returned to customers based on regulatory approval and management’s ongoing assessment that it is probable these items will be recovered or refunded through the ratemaking process. As of December 31, 2020, there were $603.8 million of deferred costs included in regulatory assets and $180.6 million of regulatory liabilities awaiting cash outflow or potential refund. Under the current regulatory environment, Cleco Power believes these regulatory assets will be fully recoverable; however, if in the future, as a result of regulatory changes or competition, Cleco Power’s ability to recover these regulatory assets would
no longer be probable, then to the extent that such regulatory assets were determined not to be recoverable, Cleco Power would be required to write-down such assets. Further, potential deregulation of the industry or possible future changes in the method of rate regulation of Cleco Power could require discontinuance of the application of the authoritative guidance of regulated operations.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the accounting for the effects of regulatory matters is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management in evaluating the impact of regulatory orders and accounting guidance on relevant transactions and (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing audit procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to the timing of revenue recognition, the evaluation of cost deferral and the recoverability and refund of certain assets.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, evaluating (i) management’s process for identifying relevant transactions which require regulatory treatment; (ii) management’s assessment regarding the accounting impacts arising from regulatory orders and accounting guidance; (iii) the reasonableness of management’s assessment regarding the timing of revenue recognition, probability of recovery of regulatory assets and the establishment of regulatory liabilities; and (iv) the regulatory assets and liabilities calculated by management based on provisions and formulas outlined in rate orders and other correspondence.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
March 3, 2021
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Statements of Income | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating revenue | | | | | |
Electric operations | $ | 1,370,893 | | | $ | 1,496,736 | | | $ | 1,181,907 | |
Other operations | 180,524 | | | 182,832 | | | 82,332 | |
| | | | | |
Gross operating revenue | 1,551,417 | | | 1,679,568 | | | 1,264,239 | |
Electric customer credits | (53,271) | | | (39,963) | | | (33,195) | |
Operating revenue, net | 1,498,146 | | | 1,639,605 | | | 1,231,044 | |
Operating expenses | | | | | |
Fuel used for electric generation | 326,869 | | | 466,831 | | | 382,556 | |
Purchased power | 282,255 | | | 280,991 | | | 168,180 | |
Other operations and maintenance | 299,640 | | | 291,031 | | | 197,032 | |
Depreciation and amortization | 219,363 | | | 216,320 | | | 170,414 | |
Taxes other than income taxes | 61,321 | | | 61,870 | | | 48,791 | |
Merger transaction and commitment costs | 3,606 | | | 7,668 | | | 19,514 | |
| | | | | |
Total operating expenses | 1,193,054 | | | 1,324,711 | | | 986,487 | |
Operating income | 305,092 | | | 314,894 | | | 244,557 | |
Interest income | 3,948 | | | 6,090 | | | 6,073 | |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 998 | | | 15,397 | | | 14,159 | |
| | | | | |
Other (expense) income, net | (14,156) | | | 758 | | | (14,328) | |
Interest charges | | | | | |
Interest charges, net | 139,272 | | | 147,346 | | | 131,348 | |
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction | (1,408) | | | (6,037) | | | (4,706) | |
Total interest charges | 137,864 | | | 141,309 | | | 126,642 | |
Income before income taxes | 158,018 | | | 195,830 | | | 123,819 | |
Federal and state income tax expense | 35,718 | | | 43,165 | | | 29,382 | |
Net income | $ | 122,300 | | | $ | 152,665 | | | $ | 94,437 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Net income | $ | 122,300 | | | $ | 152,665 | | | $ | 94,437 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | | | |
Postretirement benefits (loss) gain (net of tax benefit of $2,922, tax benefit of $6,808, and tax expense of $1,868, respectively) | (8,283) | | | (19,299) | | | 5,296 | |
| | | | | |
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax | (8,283) | | | (19,299) | | | 5,296 | |
Comprehensive income, net of tax | $ | 114,017 | | | $ | 133,366 | | | $ | 99,733 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Assets | | | |
Current assets | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 84,976 | | | $ | 116,292 | |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 4,545 | | | 11,100 | |
Customer accounts receivable (less allowance for credit losses of $2,758 in 2020 and $3,005 in 2019 | 82,511 | | | 83,591 | |
| | | |
Other accounts receivable | 32,076 | | | 35,731 | |
| | | |
Unbilled revenue | 40,127 | | | 33,207 | |
Fuel inventory, at average cost | 109,494 | | | 83,061 | |
Materials and supplies, at average cost | 132,449 | | | 118,858 | |
Energy risk management assets | 13,081 | | | 7,023 | |
Accumulated deferred fuel | 28,194 | | | 22,910 | |
Cash surrender value of company-/trust-owned life insurance policies | 89,138 | | | 86,096 | |
Prepayments | 14,549 | | | 7,711 | |
Regulatory assets | 21,041 | | | 19,807 | |
Other current assets | 12,711 | | | 12,688 | |
Total current assets | 664,892 | | | 638,075 | |
Property, plant, and equipment | | | |
Property, plant, and equipment | 5,337,190 | | | 4,982,255 | |
Accumulated depreciation | (672,271) | | | (454,874) | |
Net property, plant, and equipment | 4,664,919 | | | 4,527,381 | |
Construction work in progress | 124,622 | | | 117,630 | |
Total property, plant, and equipment, net | 4,789,541 | | | 4,645,011 | |
Equity investment in investee | 9,072 | | | 17,072 | |
Goodwill | 1,490,797 | | | 1,490,797 | |
Prepayments | 23,405 | | | 25,949 | |
Operating lease right of use assets | 26,172 | | | 28,791 | |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 744 | | | 15,203 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Note receivable | 14,506 | | | 15,198 | |
Regulatory assets | 554,609 | | | 422,431 | |
| | | |
Intangible assets | 111,731 | | | 138,103 | |
| | | |
Other deferred charges | 40,100 | | | 39,668 | |
Total assets | $ | 7,725,569 | | | $ | 7,476,298 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | |
| | | |
(Continued on next page) | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Liabilities and member’s equity | | | |
Liabilities | | | |
Current liabilities | | | |
Short-term debt | $ | 75,000 | | | $ | 0 | |
Long-term debt and finance leases due within one year | 66,682 | | | 125,986 | |
Accounts payable | 161,357 | | | 158,863 | |
| | | |
Accounts payable - affiliate | 41,283 | | | 33,780 | |
Customer deposits | 58,718 | | | 58,289 | |
Provision for rate refund | 9,444 | | | 38,903 | |
| | | |
Taxes payable, net | 7,530 | | | 8,931 | |
Interest accrued | 15,583 | | | 19,001 | |
| | | |
Energy risk management liabilities | 2,453 | | | 4,113 | |
| | | |
Regulatory liabilities - other | 23,509 | | | 6,675 | |
Deferred compensation | 13,240 | | | 12,115 | |
| | | |
Other current liabilities | 49,813 | | | 44,683 | |
Total current liabilities | 524,612 | | | 511,339 | |
Long-term liabilities and deferred credits | | | |
Accumulated deferred federal and state income taxes, net | 661,376 | | | 657,058 | |
| | | |
Postretirement benefit obligations | 314,653 | | | 283,075 | |
| | | |
Regulatory liabilities - deferred taxes, net | 157,056 | | | 146,948 | |
Restricted storm reserve | 0 | | | 12,285 | |
| | | |
Deferred lease revenue | 40,657 | | | 49,862 | |
Intangible liabilities | 24,859 | | | 31,872 | |
| | | |
Asset retirement obligations | 27,986 | | | 23,173 | |
Operating lease liabilities | 23,333 | | | 25,779 | |
Other deferred credits | 28,627 | | | 27,222 | |
Total long-term liabilities and deferred credits | 1,278,547 | | | 1,257,274 | |
Long-term debt and finance leases, net | 3,165,387 | | | 3,064,679 | |
Total liabilities | 4,968,546 | | | 4,833,292 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) | 0 | | 0 |
Member’s equity | 2,757,023 | | | 2,643,006 | |
Total liabilities and member’s equity | $ | 7,725,569 | | | $ | 7,476,298 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | | | | |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating activities | | | | | |
Net income | $ | 122,300 | | | $ | 152,665 | | | $ | 94,437 | |
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 249,494 | | | 245,682 | | | 187,426 | |
| | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | 5,488 | | | 2,348 | | | 797 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Unearned compensation expense | 5,715 | | | 5,409 | | | 5,837 | |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | (998) | | | (15,397) | | | (14,159) | |
(Gain) loss on risk management assets and liabilities, net | (13,261) | | | 10,180 | | | 0 | |
Deferred lease revenue | (9,205) | | | (8,439) | | | 0 | |
Deferred income taxes | 35,876 | | | 40,081 | | | 6,543 | |
Deferred fuel costs | (4,142) | | | 11,132 | | | (18,549) | |
Cash surrender value of company-/trust-owned life insurance | (3,042) | | | (5,705) | | | 2,726 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | (8,772) | | | (9,532) | | | 3,123 | |
Accounts receivable - affiliate | (621) | | | (1,041) | | | 635 | |
Unbilled revenue | (6,920) | | | 2,107 | | | 1,084 | |
Fuel inventory and materials and supplies | (39,602) | | | 18,463 | | | (2,981) | |
Prepayments | (20,117) | | | (14,479) | | | 153 | |
Accounts payable | (19,612) | | | 13,507 | | | 18,898 | |
Accounts payable - affiliate | 1,470 | | | 3,175 | | | 0 | |
Customer deposits | 6,663 | | | 5,888 | | | 13,757 | |
Provision for merger commitments | 560 | | | (1,848) | | | (3,273) | |
Postretirement benefit obligations | (9,588) | | | (10,981) | | | 4,646 | |
Regulatory assets and liabilities, net | (76,428) | | | 90 | | | 3,032 | |
Other deferred accounts | (16,931) | | | (7,147) | | | (9,748) | |
Taxes accrued | 4,633 | | | (3,619) | | | 20,976 | |
Interest accrued | (3,417) | | | 3,173 | | | 1,124 | |
Deferred compensation | 1,125 | | | 1,316 | | | (1,521) | |
Other operating | 5,151 | | | (6,909) | | | 2,798 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 205,819 | | | 430,119 | | | 317,761 | |
Investing activities | | | | | |
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | (390,013) | | | (323,791) | | | (291,061) | |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 998 | | | 15,397 | | | 14,159 | |
| | | | | |
Reimbursement for property loss | 115 | | | 141 | | | 1,375 | |
| | | | | |
Return of equity investment in investee | 8,000 | | | 1,100 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | |
Return of investment in company-owned life insurance | 1,912 | | | 3,761 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | |
Return of equity investment in tax credit fund | 0 | | | 1,625 | | | 2,775 | |
Issuance of note receivable | 0 | | | 0 | | | (16,800) | |
Payment to acquire business, net of cash received | 0 | | | (814,969) | | | 0 | |
Other investing | 1,081 | | | 1,313 | | | 1,392 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (377,907) | | | (1,115,423) | | | (288,160) | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
(Continued on next page) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | | | | |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Financing activities | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Draws on credit facilities | 238,000 | | | 108,000 | | | 0 | |
Payments on credit facilities | (163,000) | | | (108,000) | | | 0 | |
Issuances of long-term debt | 125,000 | | | 700,000 | | | 50,000 | |
Repayments of long-term debt | (75,055) | | | (390,571) | | | (19,193) | |
| | | | | |
Payment of financing costs | (4,570) | | | (5,959) | | | (791) | |
Contribution from member | 0 | | | 384,900 | | | 0 | |
Distributions to member | 0 | | | 0 | | | (71,350) | |
Other financing | (617) | | | (557) | | | (383) | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 119,758 | | | 687,813 | | | (41,717) | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents | (52,330) | | | 2,509 | | | (12,116) | |
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of period | 142,595 | | (1) | 140,086 | | | 152,202 | |
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 90,265 | | (2) | $ | 142,595 | | (1) | $ | 140,086 | |
| | | | | | |
Supplementary cash flow information | | | | | |
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized | $ | 130,544 | | | $ | 130,988 | | | $ | 124,154 | |
Income taxes (refunded) paid, net | $ | (2,777) | | | $ | (19) | | | $ | 272 | |
Supplementary non-cash investing and financing activities | | | | | |
Accrued additions to property, plant, and equipment | $ | 7,943 | | | $ | 16,124 | | | $ | 56,450 | |
Non-cash additions to property, plant, and equipment | $ | 0 | | | $ | 52 | | | $ | 1,224 | |
Incurrence of finance lease obligation - barges | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 16,800 | |
(1) Includes cash and cash equivalents of $116,292, current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $11,100, and non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $15,203. (2) Includes cash and cash equivalents of $84,976, current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $4,545, and non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $744. |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO |
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Member’s Equity |
(THOUSANDS) |
MEMBERSHIP INTEREST | | RETAINED EARNINGS | | AOCI | | TOTAL MEMBER’S EQUITY |
Balances,Dec. 31, 2017 | $ | 2,069,376 | | | $ | 29,902 | | | $ | (2,921) | | | $ | 2,096,357 | |
Distributions to member | — | | | (71,350) | | | — | | | (71,350) | |
Net income | — | | | 94,437 | | | — | | | 94,437 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | — | | | — | | | 5,296 | | | 5,296 | |
Reclassification of effect of tax rate change | — | | | 589 | | | (589) | | | 0 | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | 2,069,376 | | | $ | 53,578 | | | $ | 1,786 | | | $ | 2,124,740 | |
Contributions from member | 384,900 | | | 0 | | | — | | | 384,900 | |
Net income | — | | | 152,665 | | | — | | | 152,665 | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — | | | — | | | (19,299) | | | (19,299) | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 2,454,276 | | | $ | 206,243 | | | $ | (17,513) | | | $ | 2,643,006 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Net income | — | | | 122,300 | | | — | | | 122,300 | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — | | | — | | | (8,283) | | | (8,283) | |
| | | | | | | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 2,454,276 | | | $ | 328,543 | | | $ | (25,796) | | | $ | 2,757,023 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
To the Board of Managers and Member of
Cleco Power LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cleco Power LLC and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of changes in member's equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases as of January 1, 2019.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of
the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Accounting for the Effects of Regulatory Matters
As described in Notes 2 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, Cleco Power complies with the accounting policies and practices prescribed by its regulatory commissions, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Louisiana Public Service Commission (LPSC). Cleco Power’s retail rates are regulated by the LPSC and its tariffs for transmission services are regulated by FERC, while rates for wholesale power sales are based on market-based rates and are ultimately reviewed by FERC. Cleco Power must evaluate its various transactions related to regulatory orders and accounting guidance to ensure the appropriate timing of revenue recognition, the evaluation of cost deferral and the recoverability and refund of certain assets. Cleco Power capitalizes or defers certain costs for recovery from customers and recognizes a liability for amounts expected to be returned to customers based on regulatory approval and management’s ongoing assessment that it is probable these items will be recovered or refunded through the ratemaking process. As of December 31, 2020, there were $456.0 million of deferred costs included in regulatory assets and $180.6 million of regulatory liabilities awaiting cash outflow or potential refund. Under the current regulatory environment, Cleco Power believes these regulatory assets will be fully recoverable; however, if in the future, as a result of regulatory changes or competition, Cleco Power’s ability to recover these regulatory assets would no longer be probable, then to the extent that such regulatory assets were determined not to be recoverable, Cleco Power would be required to write-down such assets. Further, potential deregulation of the industry or possible future changes in the method of rate regulation of Cleco Power could require discontinuance of the application of the authoritative guidance of regulated operations.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the accounting for the effects of regulatory matters is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management in evaluating the impact of regulatory orders and accounting guidance on relevant transactions and (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing audit procedures and
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
evaluating audit evidence related to the timing of revenue recognition, the evaluation of cost deferral and the recoverability and refund of certain assets.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, evaluating (i) management’s process for identifying relevant transactions which require regulatory treatment; (ii) management’s assessment regarding the accounting impacts arising from regulatory orders and accounting guidance; (iii) the reasonableness of management’s assessment regarding the timing of revenue recognition, probability of recovery of
regulatory assets and the establishment of regulatory liabilities; and (iv) the regulatory assets and liabilities calculated by management based on provisions and formulas outlined in rate orders and other correspondence.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
March 3, 2021
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO POWER | | | | | |
|
Consolidated Statements of Income | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating revenue | | | | | |
Electric operations | $ | 1,015,018 | | | $ | 1,130,928 | | | $ | 1,191,587 | |
Other operations | 65,237 | | | 72,833 | | | 82,330 | |
Affiliate revenue | 5,156 | | | 3,125 | | | 874 | |
Gross operating revenue | 1,085,411 | | | 1,206,886 | | | 1,274,791 | |
Electric customer credits | (53,119) | | | (38,516) | | | (33,195) | |
Operating revenue, net | 1,032,292 | | | 1,168,370 | | | 1,241,596 | |
Operating expenses | | | | | |
Fuel used for electric generation | 293,492 | | | 385,317 | | | 382,556 | |
Purchased power | 100,698 | | | 111,208 | | | 168,180 | |
Other operations and maintenance | 221,146 | | | 207,164 | | | 202,552 | |
Depreciation and amortization | 166,987 | | | 172,471 | | | 162,069 | |
Taxes other than income taxes | 44,631 | | | 43,742 | | | 47,267 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total operating expenses | 826,954 | | | 919,902 | | | 962,624 | |
Operating income | 205,338 | | | 248,468 | | | 278,972 | |
Interest income | 3,362 | | | 4,744 | | | 5,052 | |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 998 | | | 15,397 | | | 14,159 | |
Other expense, net | (12,259) | | | (3,616) | | | (8,699) | |
Interest charges | | | | | |
Interest charges, net | 75,393 | | | 77,316 | | | 76,009 | |
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction | (1,408) | | | (6,037) | | | (4,706) | |
Total interest charges | 73,985 | | | 71,279 | | | 71,303 | |
Income before income taxes | 123,454 | | | 193,714 | | | 218,181 | |
Federal and state income tax expense | 26,799 | | | 45,452 | | | 55,924 | |
Net income | $ | 96,655 | | | $ | 148,262 | | | $ | 162,257 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO POWER | | | | | |
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Net income | $ | 96,655 | | | $ | 148,262 | | | $ | 162,257 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | | | |
Postretirement benefits (loss) gain (net of tax benefit of $855, tax benefit of $3,408, and tax expense of $968, respectively) | (2,422) | | | (9,657) | | | 2,743 | |
Amortization of interest rate derivatives to earnings (net of tax expense of $90 for each year presented) | 254 | | | 254 | | | 254 | |
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax | (2,168) | | | (9,403) | | | 2,997 | |
Comprehensive income, net of tax | $ | 94,487 | | | $ | 138,859 | | | $ | 165,254 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO POWER |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Assets | | | |
Utility plant and equipment | | | |
Property, plant, and equipment | $ | 5,824,378 | | | $ | 5,489,457 | |
Accumulated depreciation | (2,067,362) | | | (1,905,031) | |
Net property, plant, and equipment | 3,757,016 | | | 3,584,426 | |
Construction work in progress | 110,613 | | | 111,687 | |
Total utility plant and equipment, net | 3,867,629 | | | 3,696,113 | |
Current assets | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 24,846 | | | 55,489 | |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 4,545 | | | 11,100 | |
Customer accounts receivable (less allowance for credit losses of $2,758 in 2020 and $3,005 in 2019) | 43,852 | | | 39,165 | |
Accounts receivable - affiliate | 14,605 | | | 14,481 | |
Other accounts receivable | 27,535 | | | 24,604 | |
| | | |
Unbilled revenue | 40,127 | | | 33,207 | |
Fuel inventory, at average cost | 63,234 | | | 59,602 | |
Materials and supplies, at average cost | 105,340 | | | 91,941 | |
Energy risk management assets | 4,337 | | | 6,311 | |
Accumulated deferred fuel | 28,194 | | | 22,910 | |
Cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance policies | 16,184 | | | 17,574 | |
Prepayments | 7,163 | | | 4,786 | |
Regulatory assets | 13,305 | | | 10,973 | |
Other current assets | 830 | | | 655 | |
Total current assets | 394,097 | | | 392,798 | |
Equity investment in investee | 9,072 | | | 17,072 | |
Prepayments | 1,496 | | | 2,693 | |
Operating lease right of use assets | 26,006 | | | 28,633 | |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 0 | | | 14,363 | |
| | | |
Note receivable | 14,506 | | | 15,198 | |
| | | |
Regulatory assets | 414,535 | | | 272,289 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Other deferred charges | 38,806 | | | 37,371 | |
Total assets | $ | 4,766,147 | | | $ | 4,476,530 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | |
| | | |
(Continued on next page) | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO POWER |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Liabilities and member’s equity | | | |
Member’s equity | $ | 1,807,879 | | | $ | 1,713,392 | |
Long-term debt and finance leases, net | 1,502,257 | | | 1,327,372 | |
Total capitalization | 3,310,136 | | | 3,040,764 | |
Current liabilities | | | |
Short-term debt | 75,000 | | | 0 | |
Long-term debt and finance leases due within one year | 682 | | | 61,587 | |
Accounts payable | 106,089 | | | 110,096 | |
| | | |
Accounts payable - affiliate | 72,068 | | | 14,123 | |
Customer deposits | 58,718 | | | 58,289 | |
Provision for rate refund | 8,630 | | | 38,241 | |
| | | |
Taxes payable, net | 4,778 | | | 38,888 | |
Interest accrued | 5,357 | | | 7,972 | |
| | | |
Energy risk management liabilities | 1,121 | | | 586 | |
| | | |
Regulatory liabilities - other | 23,509 | | | 6,675 | |
| | | |
Other current liabilities | 24,754 | | | 22,802 | |
Total current liabilities | 380,706 | | | 359,259 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) | 0 | | 0 |
Long-term liabilities and deferred credits | | | |
Accumulated deferred federal and state income taxes, net | 634,598 | | | 657,834 | |
| | | |
Postretirement benefit obligations | 230,825 | | | 206,270 | |
| | | |
Regulatory liabilities - deferred taxes, net | 157,056 | | | 146,948 | |
Restricted storm reserve | 0 | | | 12,285 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Asset retirement obligations | 11,364 | | | 7,325 | |
Operating lease liabilities | 23,295 | | | 25,658 | |
Other deferred credits | 18,167 | | | 20,187 | |
Total long-term liabilities and deferred credits | 1,075,305 | | | 1,076,507 | |
Total liabilities and member’s equity | $ | 4,766,147 | | | $ | 4,476,530 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO POWER | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating activities | | | | | |
Net income | $ | 96,655 | | | $ | 148,262 | | | $ | 162,257 | |
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 172,452 | | | 178,245 | | | 168,248 | |
| | | | | |
Provision for credit losses | 5,100 | | | 2,348 | | | 797 | |
Unearned compensation expense | 1,150 | | | 974 | | | 1,873 | |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | (998) | | | (15,397) | | | (14,159) | |
Deferred income taxes | 6,165 | | | 21,799 | | | (11,545) | |
Deferred fuel costs | (4,142) | | | 11,132 | | | (18,549) | |
Cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance | 1,390 | | | 2,923 | | | (219) | |
Changes in assets and liabilities | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | (21,289) | | | (4,740) | | | 3,967 | |
Accounts receivable - affiliate | 3,403 | | | 728 | | | 426 | |
Unbilled revenue | (6,920) | | | 2,107 | | | 1,084 | |
Fuel inventory and materials and supplies | (16,609) | | | 21,121 | | | (2,981) | |
Prepayments | (1,414) | | | 386 | | | 107 | |
Accounts payable | (27,401) | | | 14,659 | | | 22,419 | |
Accounts payable - affiliate | (276) | | | 5,912 | | | (4,700) | |
Customer deposits | 6,663 | | | 5,888 | | | 13,757 | |
Provision for merger commitments | (1,752) | | | (1,848) | | | (3,273) | |
Postretirement benefit obligations | (12,321) | | | (10,078) | | | 4,252 | |
Regulatory assets and liabilities, net | (78,416) | | | (1,897) | | | 1,044 | |
Other deferred accounts | (17,262) | | | (6,338) | | | (5,421) | |
Taxes accrued | 23,442 | | | (20,881) | | | 16,566 | |
Interest accrued | (2,614) | | | (280) | | | 1,169 | |
Other operating | 2,773 | | | (2,541) | | | 2,569 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 127,779 | | | 352,484 | | | 339,688 | |
Investing activities | | | | | |
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | (378,042) | | | (313,962) | | | (289,153) | |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | 998 | | | 15,397 | | | 14,159 | |
| | | | | |
Reimbursement for property loss | 115 | | | 141 | | | 1,375 | |
Issuance of note receivable | 0 | | | 0 | | | (16,800) | |
| | | | | |
Return of equity investment in investee | 8,000 | | | 1,100 | | | 0 | |
Return of investment in company-owned life insurance | 1,912 | | | 3,761 | | | 0 | |
Other investing | 1,081 | | | 1,313 | | | 1,392 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (365,936) | | | (292,250) | | | (289,027) | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
(Continued on next page) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO POWER | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Financing activities | | | | | |
Draws on credit facility | 150,000 | | | 33,000 | | | 0 | |
Payments on credit facility | (75,000) | | | (33,000) | | | 0 | |
Issuances of long-term debt | 125,000 | | | 0 | | | 50,000 | |
Repayments of long-term debt | (11,055) | | | (20,571) | | | (19,193) | |
| | | | | |
Payment of financing costs | (1,732) | | | (31) | | | (766) | |
| | | | | |
Distributions to member | 0 | | | (20,000) | | | (121,400) | |
Other financing | (617) | | | (557) | | | (382) | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 186,596 | | | (41,159) | | | (91,741) | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents | (51,561) | | | 19,075 | | | (41,080) | |
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of period | 80,952 | | (1) | 61,877 | | | 102,957 | |
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 29,391 | | (2) | $ | 80,952 | | (1) | $ | 61,877 | |
| | | | | |
Supplementary cash flow information | | | | | |
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized | $ | 67,799 | | | $ | 67,391 | | | $ | 70,357 | |
| | | | | |
Supplementary non-cash investing and financing activities | | | | | |
Accrued additions to property, plant, and equipment | $ | 6,824 | | | $ | 14,894 | | | $ | 55,718 | |
| | | | | |
Incurrence of finance lease obligation - barges | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 16,800 | |
(1) Includes cash and cash equivalents of $55,489, current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $11,100, and non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $14,363. (2) Includes cash and cash equivalents of $24,846 and current restricted cash and cash equivalents of $4,545. |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO POWER | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Member’s Equity | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | MEMBER’S EQUITY | | AOCI | | TOTAL MEMBER’S EQUITY |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2017 | $ | 1,564,362 | | | $ | (13,683) | | | $ | 1,550,679 | |
| | | | | |
Distributions to member | (121,400) | | | — | | | (121,400) | |
Net income | 162,257 | | | — | | | 162,257 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | — | | | 2,997 | | | 2,997 | |
Reclassification of effect of tax rate change | 2,496 | | | (2,496) | | | 0 | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | 1,607,715 | | | $ | (13,182) | | | $ | 1,594,533 | |
Distributions to member | (20,000) | | | — | | | (20,000) | |
Net income | 148,262 | | | — | | | 148,262 | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — | | | (9,403) | | | (9,403) | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 1,735,977 | | | $ | (22,585) | | | $ | 1,713,392 | |
| | | | | |
Net income | 96,655 | | | — | | | 96,655 | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — | | | (2,168) | | | (2,168) | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 1,832,632 | | | $ | (24,753) | | | $ | 1,807,879 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Index to Applicable Notes to the Financial Statements of Registrants |
| | | | | | | | |
Note 1 | The Company | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 2 | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 3 | Business Combinations | Cleco |
Note 4 | Leases | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 5 | Revenue Recognition | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 6 | Regulatory Assets and Liabilities | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 7 | Jointly Owned Generation Units | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 8 | Fair Value Accounting | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 9 | Debt | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 10 | Pension Plan and Employee Benefits | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 11 | Income Taxes | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 12 | Disclosures about Segments | Cleco |
Note 13 | Regulation and Rates | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 14 | Variable Interest Entities | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 15 | Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 16 | Affiliate Transactions | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 17 | Intangible Assets, Intangible Liabilities, and Goodwill | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 18 | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Cleco and Cleco Power |
Note 19 | Storm Restoration | Cleco and Cleco Power |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes to the Financial Statements |
Cleco is composed of the following:
•Cleco Power, a regulated electric utility subsidiary, which owns 10 generating units with a total rated capacity of 3,360 MW and serves approximately 290,000 customers in Louisiana through its retail business and supplies wholesale power in Louisiana and Mississippi. Cleco Power also owns a 50% interest in an entity that owns lignite reserves. Cleco Power owns all of the outstanding membership interests in Cleco Katrina/Rita, a special purpose entity that is consolidated with Cleco Power in its financial statements.
•Cleco Cajun, an unregulated electric utility subsidiary, which owns 14 generating units with a total rated capacity of 3,379 MW and supplies wholesale power and capacity in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas. Cleco Cajun owns all of the outstanding membership interest in Cottonwood Energy. Upon the closing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cottonwood Energy entered into the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback. For more information on the Cleco Cajun Transaction, see Note 3 — “Business Combinations.”
•Cleco’s other operations consist of the following:
◦Cleco Holdings, a holding company,
◦Support Group, a shared services subsidiary,
◦Diversified Lands, an investment subsidiary, and
◦Attala and Perryville, 2 subsidiaries that owned and operated transmission interconnection facilities prior to the assets being sold by Cleco on December 29, 2017.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
COVID-19 Impacts
On March 11, 2020, WHO declared the outbreak of COVID-19 to be a global pandemic, and on March 13, 2020, the U.S. declared a national emergency. In response to these declarations and the rapid spread of COVID-19, federal, state and local governments imposed varying degrees of restrictions on business and social activities to contain COVID-19, including quarantine and “stay-at-home” orders and directives in Cleco’s service territory. These restrictions have significantly impacted many sectors of the economy with record levels of unemployment, driven by businesses, nonprofit organizations, and governmental entities modifying, curtailing, or ceasing normal operations. State and local authorities have also implemented multistep policies with the goal of reopening various sectors of the economy such as retail establishments, health and personal care businesses, and restaurants, among others. However, certain jurisdictions have begun reopening only to delay these plans or return to restrictions in the face of increases in new COVID-19 cases. For example, the governor of the state of Louisiana issued orders in May 2020 to allow businesses to reopen at varying levels of capacity in May and June 2020. To address the June 2020 spike in COVID-19 cases, such reopening activities were temporarily paused or scaled back, and also included closing certain establishments. These restrictions resulted in a decline in new COVID-19 cases, and in September 2020, the state of Louisiana entered into the next phase of its multistep reopening plan. However, in the fall of 2020, new COVID-19 cases began to rise once again and in November 2020, the governor of the state of Louisiana issued orders reverting back to the previous phase of its multistep reopening plan, requiring businesses to temporarily pause or scale back their reopening activities. These increased restrictions again were successful in slowing the spread of COVID-19; therefore, effective March 3, 2021, the state of Louisiana reentered into the next phase of its multistep
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
reopening plan, reducing some of the restrictions that were in effect.
The COVID-19 pandemic may significantly worsen in the U.S. during the upcoming months, which may cause federal, state, and local governments to reconsider restrictions on business and social activities. In the event governments increase restrictions, the reopening of the economy may be further curtailed.
Cleco has modified some of its business operations, as these restrictions have significantly impacted many sectors of the economy. Impacts include record levels of unemployment, with businesses, nonprofit organizations, and governmental entities modifying, curtailing, or ceasing normal operations. Cleco has also modified and continues to adjust certain business practices to conform to government restrictions and best practices encouraged by the CDC, WHO, and other governmental and regulatory authorities.
Cleco cannot predict the full impact that COVID-19, or the significant disruption and volatility currently being experienced in the markets, will have on its business, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations at this time, due to numerous uncertainties. The ultimate impacts will depend on future developments, including, among others, the ultimate geographic spread of COVID-19, the consequences of governmental and other measures designed to prevent the spread of COVID-19, the availability and timely distribution of effective treatments and vaccines, the duration of the pandemic, actions taken by governmental authorities, customers, suppliers and other third parties, workforce availability, and the timing and extent to which normal economic and operating conditions resume.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Cleco include the accounts of Cleco and its majority-owned subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. Cleco’s consolidated financial statements include the financial results of Cleco Cajun from the closing of the Cleco Cajun Transaction on February 4, 2019, through December 31, 2020. For more information on the Cleco Cajun Transaction, see Note 3 — “Business Combinations.”
Goodwill
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price (consideration transferred and liabilities assumed) over the estimated fair value of net assets of the acquired business and is not subject to amortization. Goodwill is assessed as of August 1 of each year or more often if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. For more information on goodwill, see Note 17 — “Intangible Assets, Intangible Liabilities, and Goodwill.”
Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Intangible assets include Cleco Katrina/Rita’s right to bill and collect storm recovery charges through March 2020, fair value
adjustments for long-term wholesale power supply agreements as well as a fair value adjustment for the valuation of the Cleco trade name. Intangible liabilities also include fair value adjustments for long-term wholesale power supply agreements and a fair value adjustment for the LTSA assumed for maintenance services related to the Cottonwood Plant. The intangible assets and liabilities are being amortized over their estimated useful lives in a manner that best reflects the economic impact derived from such assets and liabilities. Impairment will be tested if there are events or circumstances that indicate that an impairment analysis should be performed. If such an event or circumstance occurs, intangible impairment testing will be performed prior to goodwill impairment testing. Impairment is calculated as the excess of the asset and liabilities’ respective carrying amounts over their respective fair values. For more information on intangible assets and liabilities, see Note 17 — “Intangible Assets, Intangible Liabilities, and Goodwill.”
Statements of Cash Flows
Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows are prepared using the indirect method. This method requires adjusting net income to remove the effects of all deferrals and accruals of operating cash receipts and payments and to remove items whose cash effects are related to investing and financing cash flows. Derivatives meeting the definition of an accounting hedge are classified in the same category as the item being hedged.
Regulation
Cleco Power is subject to regulation by FERC and the LPSC. Cleco Cajun is subject to regulation by FERC. Cleco complies with the accounting policies and practices prescribed by its regulatory commissions. Cleco Power’s retail rates are regulated by the LPSC. Cleco and Cleco Cajun’s rates for transmission services are regulated by FERC. Rates for wholesale power sales are based on market-based rates, pending FERC review of Cleco’s generation market power analysis. Cleco Power must evaluate its various transactions related to regulatory orders and accounting guidance to ensure the appropriate timing of revenue recognition, the evaluation of cost deferral, and the recoverability and refund of certain assets. Cleco Power capitalizes or defers certain costs for recovery from its customers and recognizes a liability for amounts expected to be returned to its customers based on regulatory approval and management’s ongoing assessment that it is probable these items will be recovered through the ratemaking process. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized consistent with the treatment of the related cost in the ratemaking process. Pursuant to this regulatory approval, Cleco has recorded regulatory assets and liabilities.
Any future plan adopted by the LPSC for purposes of transitioning utilities from LPSC regulation to retail competition may affect the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded by Cleco if the criteria for the application of the authoritative guidelines for industry regulated operations cannot continue to be met. At this time, Cleco cannot predict whether any legislation or regulation affecting Cleco will be enacted or adopted and, if enacted, what form such legislation or regulation may take.
For more information regarding the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded by Cleco Power, see Note 6 — “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities.”
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
AROs
Cleco and Cleco Power recognize an ARO when there is a legal obligation under existing or enacted law, statute, written or oral contract, or by legal construction under the doctrine of promissory estoppel to incur costs to remove an asset when the asset is retired. These guidelines also require an ARO, which is conditional on a future event, to be recorded even if the event has not yet occurred.
Cleco and Cleco Power recognize AROs at the present value of the projected liability in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The liability is accreted to its present value each accounting period. Cleco Power defers this accretion as a regulatory asset based on its determination that these costs can be collected from customers. Concurrent with the recognition of the liability, Cleco and Cleco Power capitalize these costs to the related property, plant, and equipment asset. These capitalized costs are depreciated over the same period as the related property asset. Cleco Power also defers the current depreciation of the asset retirement cost as a regulatory asset.
In June 2020, Cleco Power remeasured its ARO liability and recorded a $3.3 million increase due to the expected retirement of Dolet Hills Power Station. In September 2020, Cleco Cajun recorded a $0.9 million decrease to its ARO liability associated with the Sterlington generating station as a result of the retirement of the plant. In October 2020, Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun recorded a $0.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, increase to their ARO liability as a result of the decision to accelerate closure of certain ash management areas in order to comply with updated environmental regulations. For more information on Cleco Power’s current AROs, see Note 6 — “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — AROs” and Note 15 — “Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures and Guarantee — Risks and Uncertainties.”
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment consists primarily of utility generation and energy transmission and distribution assets. Assets utilized primarily for retail and wholesale operations and electric transmission and distribution are stated at the cost of construction, which includes certain materials, labor, payroll taxes and benefits, administrative and general costs, and the estimated cost of funds used during construction. Jointly owned assets are reflected in property, plant, and equipment at Cleco Power’s and Cleco Cajun’s share of the cost to construct or purchase the respective assets. For information on jointly owned assets, see Note 7 — “Jointly Owned Generation Units.”
At the date of the 2016 Merger, Cleco’s gross balance of fixed depreciable assets was adjusted to be net of accumulated depreciation, as no accumulated depreciation existed on such date. Since pushdown accounting was not elected at the Cleco Power level, Cleco Power retained its accumulated depreciation.
Cleco’s cost of improvements to property, plant, and equipment is capitalized. Costs associated with repairs and major maintenance projects are expensed as incurred. Cleco capitalizes the cost to purchase or develop software for internal use. On August 1, 2019, Cleco and Cleco Power began amortizing the computer software related to the START project. The amounts of unamortized computer software costs on Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2020, and 2019 were $178.1 million and $168.6 million,
respectively. The amounts of unamortized computer software costs on Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2020, and 2019 were $177.0 million and $166.2 million, respectively. Amortization of capitalized computer software costs charged to expense in Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ending December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 is shown in the following tables:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Amortization | $ | 11,015 | | | $ | 4,917 | | | $ | 2,154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Amortization | $ | 10,379 | | | $ | 4,321 | | | $ | 1,607 | |
Upon retirement or disposition, the cost of Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun’s depreciable plant and the cost of removal, net of salvage value, are charged to accumulated depreciation. For Cleco’s other subsidiaries, upon disposition or retirement of depreciable assets, the difference between the net book value of the property and any proceeds received for the property is recorded as a gain or loss on asset disposition on Cleco’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Any cost incurred to remove the asset is charged to expense.
Cleco Cajun’s depreciation on property, plant, and equipment is calculated primarily on a composite basis over the useful lives of the assets. Depreciation on all other property, plant, and equipment is calculated primarily on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the assets. The following table presents the useful lives of depreciable assets for Cleco and Cleco Power:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CATEGORY (YEARS) | CLECO | | CLECO POWER |
Utility Plants | | | | | | | |
Generation | 6 | – | 95 | | 10 | – | 95 |
Distribution | 15 | – | 50 | | 15 | – | 50 |
Transmission | 5 | – | 55 | | 5 | – | 55 |
Other utility plant | 2 | – | 45 | | 5 | – | 45 |
Other property, plant, and equipment | 5 | – | 45 | | 5 | – | 45 |
At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco and Cleco Power’s property, plant, and equipment consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Utility plants | | | |
Generation | $ | 2,915,349 | | | $ | 2,812,843 | |
Distribution | 1,357,714 | | | 1,153,086 | |
Transmission | 667,398 | | | 660,279 | |
Other utility plant | 391,057 | | | 350,683 | |
Other property, plant, and equipment | 5,672 | | | 5,364 | |
Total property, plant, and equipment | 5,337,190 | | | 4,982,255 | |
Accumulated depreciation | (672,271) | | | (454,874) | |
Net property, plant, and equipment | $ | 4,664,919 | | | $ | 4,527,381 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Regulated utility plants | | | |
Generation | $ | 2,673,271 | | | $ | 2,633,590 | |
Distribution | 1,796,841 | | | 1,593,104 | |
Transmission | 857,833 | | | 805,701 | |
Other utility plant | 496,433 | | | 457,062 | |
Total property, plant, and equipment | 5,824,378 | | | 5,489,457 | |
Accumulated depreciation | (2,067,362) | | | (1,905,031) | |
Net property, plant, and equipment | $ | 3,757,016 | | | $ | 3,584,426 | |
On February 4, 2019, Cleco acquired $741.2 million of unregulated property, plant, and equipment as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction. These assets were recorded at fair market value at the date of the acquisition. For more information on the Cleco Cajun Transaction, see Note 3 — “Business Combinations.”
During 2020, Cleco Power’s regulated utility property, plant, and equipment increased primarily due to the costs related to Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta, and other capital projects.
Deferred Project Costs
Cleco Power defers costs related to the initial stage of a construction project during which time the feasibility of the construction of property, plant, and equipment is being investigated. At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco Power had deferred $2.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, for projects that are in the initial stages of development. These amounts are classified as Other deferred charges on Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Fuel Inventory and Materials and Supplies
Fuel inventory consists primarily of petroleum coke, coal, limestone, lignite, and natural gas used to generate electricity.
Materials and supplies consists of transmission and distribution line construction and repair materials. It also consists of generating station and transmission and distribution substation repair materials.
Both fuel inventory and materials and supplies are recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the average cost method and are issued from stock using the average cost of existing stock. Materials and supplies are recorded when purchased and subsequently charged to expense or capitalized to property, plant, and equipment when installed.
Reserves for Credit Losses
Customer accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Customer accounts receivables are generally considered to become past due 20 days after the billing date. Cleco recognizes write-offs within the allowance for credit losses once all recovery methods have been exhausted. It is the policy of management to review accounts receivable and unbilled revenue monthly using a reserve matrix based on historical bad debt write-offs as well as current and forecasted economic conditions to establish a credit loss estimate. Management’s historical credit loss analysis included periods of economic recessions, natural disasters, and temporary changes to collection policies. Due to the critical necessity of electricity, none of these past events have significantly impacted Cleco’s credit loss rates.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the LPSC issued an executive order prohibiting the disconnection of utilities for nonpayment from March 13, 2020, through July 16, 2020. As a result of this executive order, Cleco Power suspended the assessment of late fees, disconnections, and the utilization of collection agencies, which resulted in no additional charge-offs during the second and third quarters of 2020. On July 16, 2020, Cleco Power began setting up payment plan arrangements for customers with past due balances to be repaid over a period of up to 18 months. On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall in southwest Louisiana causing substantial damage to Cleco’s distribution and transmission facilities and to the properties of Cleco’s customers. Although Cleco’s service territory experienced a recent decline in the economy related to these events, the economic outlook at December 31, 2020, was still within range of its historical credit loss analysis. Cleco began resuming disconnections and late fees and utilizing collection agencies on October 1, 2020. In October 2020, hurricanes Delta and Zeta made landfall in south Louisiana causing substantial damage to Cleco’s distribution and transmission facilities and to the properties of Cleco’s customers. Due to the hurricanes, Cleco suspended disconnections for part of October and began resuming disconnections on November 3, 2020.
The table below presents the changes in the allowance for credit losses by receivable for Cleco and Cleco Power:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE | OTHER* | TOTAL |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 3,005 | | $ | 1,250 | | $ | 4,255 | |
CECL adoption | 71 | | — | | 71 | |
Current period provision | 5,029 | | 388 | | 5,417 | |
Charge-offs | (6,423) | | 0 | | (6,423) | |
Recovery | 1,076 | | 0 | | 1,076 | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 2,758 | | $ | 1,638 | | $ | 4,396 | |
* Loan held at Diversified Lands that was fully reserved for at December 31, 2020.
| | | | | |
Cleco Power | |
(THOUSANDS) | ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 3,005 | |
CECL adoption | 71 | |
Current period provision | 5,029 | |
Charge-offs | (6,423) | |
Recovery | 1,076 | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 2,758 | |
For more information on the adoption of CECL, see “— Recent Authoritative Guidance.”
Other Reserves
Cleco maintains property insurance on generating stations, buildings and contents, and substations. Cleco is self-insured for any damage to its power lines. To mitigate the exposure to potential financial loss for damage to lines, Cleco Power maintains an LPSC-approved funded storm reserve.
Cleco also maintains liability and workers’ compensation insurance to mitigate financial losses due to injuries and damages to the property of others. Cleco’s insurance covers claims that exceed certain self-insured limits. For claims within certain self-insured limits, Cleco maintains reserves. At December 31, 2020, and 2019, the general liability and
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
workers compensation reserves together were $4.5 million and $4.3 million, respectively.
Additionally, Cleco maintains directors and officers insurance to protect managers from claims which may arise from their decisions and actions taken within the scope of their regular duties.
Cash Equivalents
Cleco considers highly liquid, marketable securities, and other similar instruments with original maturity dates of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
Various agreements to which Cleco is subject contain covenants that restrict its use of cash. As certain provisions under these agreements are met, cash is transferred out of related escrow accounts and becomes available for its intended purposes and/or general company purposes.
Cleco and Cleco Power’s restricted cash and cash equivalents consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Current | | | |
Cleco Katrina/Rita’s storm recovery bonds | $ | 2,626 | | | $ | 9,632 | |
Cleco Power’s charitable contributions | 1,718 | | | 1,200 | |
Cleco Power’s rate credit escrow | 201 | | | 268 | |
Total current | 4,545 | | | 11,100 | |
Non-current | | | |
Diversified Lands’ mitigation escrow | 22 | | | 21 | |
Cleco Cajun’s defense fund | 722 | | | 719 | |
Cleco Cajun’s margin deposits | 0 | | | 100 | |
Cleco Power’s future storm restoration costs | 0 | | | 12,269 | |
Cleco Power’s charitable contributions | 0 | | | 2,094 | |
| | | |
Total non-current | 744 | | | 15,203 | |
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents | $ | 5,289 | | | $ | 26,303 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Current | | | |
Cleco Katrina/Rita’s storm recovery bonds | $ | 2,626 | | | $ | 9,632 | |
Charitable contributions | 1,718 | | | 1,200 | |
Rate credit escrow | 201 | | | 268 | |
Total current | 4,545 | | | 11,100 | |
Non-current | | | |
Future storm restoration costs | 0 | | | 12,269 | |
Charitable contributions | 0 | | | 2,094 | |
| | | |
Total non-current | 0 | | | 14,363 | |
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,545 | | | $ | 25,463 | |
Cleco Katrina/Rita had the right to bill and collect storm restoration costs from Cleco Power’s customers. As cash was collected, it was restricted for payment of administration fees, interest, and principal on storm recovery bonds. The change from December 31, 2019, to December 31, 2020, was due to Cleco Katrina/Rita using $11.1 million for the final storm recovery bond principal payment and $0.3 million for the related final interest payment, partially offset by collections of $4.4 million net of administration fees. At December 31, 2020,
the remaining $2.6 million of restricted cash is expected to be used for final administrative and winding up activities of Cleco Katrina/Rita, including refunds to Cleco Power customers for amounts remaining after all other costs are paid.
Cleco Power’s restricted cash and cash equivalents held for future storm restoration costs decreased $12.3 million from December 31, 2019, primarily due to the transfer of $8.3 million towards the costs associated with Hurricane Laura and $4.0 million to cover costs associated with other storms. For more information about Hurricane Laura, see Note 19 — “Storm Restoration.”
Equity Investments
Cleco and Cleco Power account for investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies using the equity method of accounting. The amounts reported on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets represent assets contributed by Cleco or Cleco Power, plus their share of the net income of the affiliate, less any distributions of earnings (dividends) received from the affiliate. The revenues and expenses (excluding income taxes) of these affiliates are netted and reported on one line item as equity income from investees on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
Cleco evaluates for impairments of equity method investments at each balance sheet date to determine if events and circumstances have occurred that indicate a possible other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of the investment and the possible inability to recover the carrying value through operations. Cleco uses estimates of the future cash flows from the investee and observable market transactions in order to calculate fair value and recoverability. An impairment is recognized when an other-than-temporary decline in market value occurs and recovery of the carrying value is not probable. There were 0 impairments recorded for 2020, 2019, or 2018. For more information on Cleco’s equity investments, see Note 14 — “Variable Interest Entities.”
Income Taxes
Cleco accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Cleco provides for federal and state income taxes currently payable, as well as for those deferred due to timing differences between reporting income and expenses for financial statement purposes versus tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted income tax rates expected to be applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as non-current on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cleco’s income tax expense and related regulatory assets and liabilities could be affected by changes in its assumptions and estimates and by ultimate resolution of assumptions and estimates with taxing authorities. Cleco Group files a federal income tax return for all wholly owned subsidiaries. Cleco Power computes its federal and state income taxes as if it were a stand-alone taxpayer. The LPSC generally requires Cleco Power to flow the effects of state income taxes to customers. For more information on income taxes, see Note 11 — “Income Taxes.”
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Investment Tax Credits
Investment tax credits, which were deferred for financial statement purposes, are amortized as a reduction to income tax expense over the estimated service lives of the properties that gave rise to the credits.
Debt Issuance Costs, Premiums, and Discounts
Issuance costs, premiums, and discounts applicable to debt securities are amortized to interest expense ratably over the lives of the related issuances. Expenses and call premiums related to refinanced Cleco Power debt are deferred and amortized over the life of the new issuance. Debt issuance costs, premiums, and discounts are presented as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the related debt liability.
Revenue and Fuel Costs
Utility Revenue
Revenue from sales of electricity is recognized when the service is provided. The costs of fuel and purchased power used for Cleco Power’s retail customers currently are recovered from its customers through Cleco Power’s FAC. These costs are subject to audit and final determination by regulators. Sales taxes and pass-through fees collected on the sale of electricity are not recorded in utility revenue.
Unbilled Revenue
Cleco Power accrues estimated revenue monthly for energy used by customers but not yet billed. The monthly estimated unbilled revenue amounts are recorded as unbilled revenue and a receivable. Cleco Power uses actual customer energy consumption data available from AMI to calculate unbilled revenues.
Other Operations Revenue
Other operations revenue is recognized at the time products or services are provided to and accepted by customers, and collectability is reasonably assured.
Sales and Use Taxes
Cleco collects a sales and use tax on the sale of electricity that subsequently is remitted to the state in accordance with state law. These amounts are not recorded as income or expense on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income but are reflected at gross amounts on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as a receivable until the tax is collected and as a payable until the liability is paid. Cleco currently has no sales tax collected from customers reflected on its income statement.
Franchise Fees
Cleco Power collects a consumer fee for one of its franchise agreements. This fee is not recorded on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income as revenue and expense, but is reflected at gross amounts on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as a receivable until it is collected and as a payable until the liability is paid.
AFUDC
The capitalization of AFUDC by Cleco Power is a utility accounting practice prescribed by FERC and the LPSC. AFUDC represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance construction of new and existing facilities. While cash is not realized currently from
such allowance, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement over the same life of the plant through a higher rate base and higher depreciation. Under regulatory practices, a return on and recovery of AFUDC is permitted in setting rates charged for utility services. For 2020, Cleco Power’s average short-term debt balance exceeded its average construction work-in-progress balance; however, Cleco Power elected the FERC capital structure waiver contained in FERC Docket Number AC20-127-000. The composite AFUDC rate, including borrowed and other funds, was 10.14% on a pretax basis (7.96% net of tax) for 2020, 10.71% on a pretax basis (8.37% net of tax) for 2019 and 9.58% on a pretax basis (7.08% net of tax) for 2018. Since Cleco Power has not received LPSC authority to recover AFUDC calculated under the FERC waiver, Cleco Power recognized a regulatory liability for the difference between AFUDC calculated under the FERC waiver and AFUDC calculated using only short-term debt as a source of financing.
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
Various accounting pronouncements require certain assets and liabilities to be measured at their fair values. Some assets and liabilities are required to be measured at their fair value each reporting period, while others are required to be measured only one time, generally the date of acquisition or debt issuance. Cleco and Cleco Power disclose the fair value of certain assets and liabilities by one of three levels when required for recognition purposes. For more information about fair value levels, see Note 8 — “Fair Value Accounting.”
Derivatives and Other Risk Management Activity
Cleco’s Energy Market Risk Management Policy authorizes hedging of commodity price risk with physical or financially settled derivative instruments. Some of these contracts may qualify for the normal purchase, normal sale (NPNS) exception under derivative accounting guidance. Contracts that do not qualify for NPNS accounting treatment or are not elected for NPNS accounting treatment are marked-to-market and recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value.
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun are awarded and/or purchase FTRs in auctions facilitated by MISO. The majority of these FTRs are purchased in annual auctions during the second quarter, but additional FTRs may be purchased in monthly auctions. FTRs represent economic hedges of future congestion charges that will be incurred in serving customer load. FTRs are derivatives not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes.
Cleco Power’s FTRs are marked-to-market with the resulting unrealized gains or losses deferred as a component of deferred fuel assets or liabilities in accordance with regulatory policy. At settlement, realized gains or losses are included in the FAC and reflected on customers’ bills as a component of the fuel charge.
Cleco Cajun’s FTRs are marked-to-market with the resulting unrealized gains and losses recorded on the income statement as a component of purchased power expense. At settlement, realized gains or losses are also recorded on the income statement as a component of purchased power expense.
Cleco Cajun has fixed price physical forwards and financial swaps contracts. Management did not elect to apply hedge accounting to these contracts as allowed under applicable accounting standards. When these contracts are marked-to-market, the resulting unrealized gain or loss is
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
recorded on the income statement as a component of fuel expense. At settlement, realized gains or losses are also recorded on the income statement as a component of fuel expense.
For more information on FTRs and other commodity derivatives, see Note 8 — “Fair Value Accounting — Commodity Contracts.”
Cleco may also enter into contracts to mitigate the volatility in interest rate risk. These contracts include, but are not limited to, interest rate swaps and treasury rate locks. For each reporting period presented, the Registrants did not enter into any contracts to mitigate the volatility in interest rate risk.
Accounting for MISO Transactions
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun participate in MISO’s Energy and Operating Reserve market where sales and purchases are netted hourly. If the hourly activity nets to sales, the result is reported in Electric operations on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income. If the hourly activity nets to purchases, the result is reported in Purchased power on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
Leases
In February 2016, FASB amended the guidance to account for leases. Effective January 1, 2019, Cleco adopted the amended accounting guidance.
Cleco determines if a contract is a lease at its inception. A lease is deemed to exist when the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment is conveyed through a contract for a certain period of time and consideration is paid. If a contract is determined to be a lease, Cleco recognizes a ROU asset and lease liability at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The present value of the lease payments is determined by using the implicit interest rate if readily determinable. Cleco’s incremental borrowing rate for a term similar to the duration of the lease based on information available at the commencement date is used if the implicit interest rate is not readily determinable.
Cleco recognizes ROU assets and lease liabilities for leasing arrangements with terms greater than one year. Except for the marine transportation asset class, Cleco accounts for lease and non-lease components in a contract as a single lease component for all classes of underlying assets. Cleco’s marine transportation contracts, which include barges and towboats, contain non-lease components, such as maintenance and labor. Cleco allocates the consideration in these contracts between lease and non-lease components based on estimates of fair value from third parties that typically execute leases for this class of assets.
Expense for a lessee operating lease is recognized as a single lease cost on a straight-line basis over the lease term and reflected in the appropriate income statement line item based on the leased asset’s function. Income for a lessor operating lease is recognized as a single lease income item on a straight-line basis over the lease term and reflected in the appropriate income statement line item based on the lease asset’s function. For more information on leases, see Note 4 — “Leases.”
Recent Authoritative Guidance
In June 2016, FASB amended the guidance for the measurement of credit losses on receivables and certain other assets. In-scope items for Cleco include unbilled revenue,
trade receivables, notes receivables, other accounts receivables, and guarantees. The guidance requires use of a current expected loss model, which may result in earlier recognition of credit losses. Effective January 1, 2020, Cleco adopted the amended guidance using the prospective transition method. Adoption of this standard resulted in less than a $0.1 million increase in credit loss reserves related to unbilled revenue and trade receivables. The current expected credit loss model did not impact reserves related to any other in-scope items. For more information on Cleco’s accounting for credit losses, see “— Reserves for Credit Losses.”
In August 2018, FASB issued guidance that allows for the deferral of certain implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement. Effective January 1, 2020, Cleco adopted the guidance using the prospective transition method. Adoption of this guidance did not materially impact the Registrants’ results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
In March 2020, FASB issued optional guidance for a limited period of time that applies to entities meeting certain criteria for the contract modifications or hedging relationships that are referencing LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform. The guidance includes a general principal that permits an entity to consider contract modifications due to reference rate reform to be an event that does not require contract remeasurement at the modification date or reassessment of a previous accounting determination. The optional guidance may be applied from March 12, 2020, through December 31, 2022. Management has initiated a review of contracts to identify those with reference rates that will be discontinued and expects to apply this guidance on an on-going basis. Management does not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on the Registrants’ results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 3 — Business Combinations |
On February 4, 2019, Cleco Cajun acquired from NRG Energy all of the outstanding membership interests in South Central Generating. This acquisition enabled Cleco to significantly increase the scale of its operations in Louisiana and included the following:
•a 176-MW natural-gas-fired generating station located in Sterlington, Louisiana,
•a 220-MW natural-gas-fired facility and a 210-MW natural-gas-fired peaking facility, both located in Jarreau, Louisiana,
•a 580-MW coal-fired generating facility, a 540-MW natural-gas-fired generating station, and 58% of a 588-MW coal-fired generating station all located in New Roads, Louisiana,
•225 MW of a 300-MW natural-gas-fired peaking facility located in Jennings, Louisiana,
•a 1,263-MW natural-gas-fired generating station located in Deweyville, Texas (the Cottonwood Plant),
•wholesale contracts to provide electricity and capacity to 9 Louisiana cooperatives, 5 municipalities across Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas, and 1 investor-owned utility,
•transmission assets, which consist of equipment and land required to connect the generation stations and the wholesale customers to the transmission grid, and
•current assets consisting of cash, inventory, receivables and other miscellaneous assets.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Since the Cleco Cajun Transaction on February 4, 2019, two of the five contracts with municipalities have expired and were not renewed. Also, the Sterlington generating station was retired in December 2020.
Cleco Cajun, NRG Energy, and South Central Generating each made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Cleco Cajun Transaction, which include customary indemnification provisions. Cleco Holdings has agreed to guarantee the obligations of Cleco Cajun, subject to certain limitations. In addition, a lease agreement was executed and delivered between Cottonwood Energy and a special-purpose entity that is a subsidiary of NRG Energy pursuant to which NRG Energy will lease back the Cottonwood Plant and will operate it no later than May 2025. Upon closing, Cottonwood Energy became a subsidiary of Cleco Cajun.
Regulatory Matters
In January 2019, the LPSC approved the Cleco Cajun Transaction. Approval of the transaction was conditioned upon certain commitments, including holding Cleco Power ratepayers harmless for any adverse impacts, increased costs of debt or equity, and credit rating downgrades attributable to the Cleco Cajun Transaction; the repayment of $400.0 million of Cleco Holdings’ debt by 2024; and a $4.0 million annual reduction to Cleco Power’s retail customer rates. For more information about the rate reduction and debt commitments, see Note 6 — “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities” and Note 9 — “Debt,” respectively.
South Central Generating
In 2017, Louisiana Generating received insurance settlement proceeds for costs incurred to resolve a lawsuit which was brought by the EPA and the LDEQ against Louisiana Generating related to Big Cajun II, Unit 3. As part of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cleco Cajun assumed a $10.0 million contingent liability and NRG Energy indemnified Cleco for losses associated with this litigation matter. As a result, Cleco also recorded a $10.0 million indemnification asset, which was included in the purchase price allocation and included in other current assets on Cleco’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. For more information on litigation involving South Central Generating, see Note 15 — “Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — South Central Generating.”
Accounting for the Cleco Cajun Transaction
As consideration for all of the outstanding membership interest in South Central Generating, Cleco paid cash of approximately $962.2 million, which represents the $1.0 billion acquisition price net of working capital and other adjustments of $37.8 million.
In connection with the Cleco Cajun Transaction on February 4, 2019, Cleco Holdings borrowed $300.0 million under a bridge loan agreement and $100.0 million under a term loan agreement. Both loan agreements are variable rate debt and have a three-year term. Both loan agreements contain certain financial covenants, including requiring Cleco Holdings to maintain (i) a debt to capital ratio (as defined in the applicable agreement) below 65% and (ii) a rating applicable to Cleco’s senior debt rating (as defined in the applicable agreement). On September 11, 2019, Cleco Holdings refinanced the remaining amounts due under the $300.0 million bridge loan agreement and a portion of the $100.0 million term loan agreement with the proceeds from the private
placement of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes. For more information, see Note 9 — “Debt.” Also, in connection with the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cleco Holdings increased its credit facility capacity by $75.0 million, for a total capacity of $175.0 million. All other terms remained the same. Also, in connection with the Cleco Cajun Transaction on February 4, 2019, Cleco Holdings made a $75.0 million draw on its credit facility, which was repaid on February 5, 2019.
The remaining cash required to finance the transaction consisted of an equity contribution from Cleco Group of $384.9 million and $102.3 million from cash on hand at Cleco Holdings.
Cleco Cajun accounted for the Cleco Cajun Transaction as a business combination, and accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. Cleco made certain measurement period adjustments at June 30, 2019. The following chart presents Cleco’s current purchase price allocation:
| | | | | |
Purchase Price Allocation | |
(THOUSANDS) | |
Current assets | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 146,494 | |
Customer and other accounts receivable | 49,809 | |
Fuel inventory | 22,060 | |
Materials and supplies | 25,659 | |
Energy risk management assets | 4,193 | |
Other current assets | 10,056 | |
Non-current assets | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | 741,203 | |
Prepayments | 36,166 | |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 707 | |
Intangible assets | 98,900 | |
Other deferred charges | 133 | |
Total assets acquired | 1,135,380 | |
Current liabilities | |
Accounts payable | 38,478 | |
Taxes payable | 723 | |
Energy risk management liabilities | 241 | |
Other current liabilities | 14,570 | |
Non-current liabilities | |
Accumulated deferred federal and state income taxes, net | 7,165 | |
Deferred lease revenue | 58,300 | |
Intangible liabilities | 38,300 | |
Asset retirement obligations | 15,323 | |
Operating lease liabilities | 110 | |
Total liabilities assumed | 173,210 | |
Total purchase price consideration | $ | 962,170 | |
The fair values of Cleco Cajun’s acquired assets and assumed liabilities were determined based on significant estimates and assumptions, including projected future cash flows and discount rates reflecting risk inherent in those future cash flows. There were also estimates made to determine the expected useful lives of each class of assets acquired.
On the date of the acquisition, fair value adjustments were recorded on Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for the difference between the contract and market price of acquired long-term wholesale power agreements. The fair value of intangible assets of $98.9 million and intangible liabilities of
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
$14.2 million was reflected in the purchase price allocation. The valuation of the acquired intangible assets and liabilities was estimated by applying the income method, which is based upon discounted projected future cash flows associated with the underlying contracts. The power supply agreement intangible assets and liabilities are being amortized to Electric operations on Cleco’s Consolidated Statement of Income over the remaining term of the applicable agreements.
As part of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cleco assumed an LTSA for maintenance services related to the Cottonwood Plant. The fair value of the LTSA was estimated by applying the income method. An intangible liability of $24.1 million was reflected in the purchase price allocation and is being amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated remaining life of the LTSA at the time it was acquired. The amortization is included as a reduction to the LTSA prepayments on Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On the date of the acquisition, the fair value of the lease between Cottonwood Energy and a special-purpose entity that is a subsidiary of NRG Energy was estimated by applying the income method. Deferred lease revenue of $58.3 million was reflected in the purchase price allocation and is being amortized over the term of the lease agreement. The amortization is included in Other operations revenue on Cleco’s Consolidated Statement of Income.
During the second quarter of 2019, certain modifications were made to the preliminary valuations as of February 4, 2019, due to the refinement of valuation models, assumptions, and inputs. The measurement period adjustments were based upon information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts recognized at that date.
| | | | | |
Measurement Period Adjustments | |
(THOUSANDS) | AT JUNE 30, 2019 |
Current assets | |
Customer and other accounts receivable | $ | 1,408 | |
Other current assets | $ | 56 | |
Non-current assets | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | $ | 13,297 | |
Prepayments | $ | (56) | |
Intangible assets | $ | (3,600) | |
Other deferred charges | $ | 1 | |
| |
Current liabilities | |
Accounts payable | $ | 3,022 | |
Energy risk management liabilities | $ | (1) | |
Other current liabilities | $ | 327 | |
Non-current liabilities | |
Accumulated deferred federal and state income taxes, net | $ | 421 | |
Deferred lease revenue | $ | (3,600) | |
Intangible liabilities | $ | 6,400 | |
Asset retirement obligations | $ | 4,534 | |
Operating lease liabilities | $ | 3 | |
| |
| |
The measurement period adjustments resulted in an increase in electric operations revenue of $0.5 million, a decrease in other operations revenue of $0.1 million, and an increase in depreciation expense of $0.2 million recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2019.
As of December 31, 2019, Cleco completed its evaluation and determination of the fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in the Cleco Cajun Transaction. There were no adjustments to those amounts during the third and fourth quarters of 2019.
Pro forma Impact of the Cleco Cajun Transaction
The following table includes the unaudited pro forma financial information reflecting the consolidated results of operations of Cleco as if the Cleco Cajun Transaction had taken place on January 1, 2018. The pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2019, was adjusted to exclude nonrecurring transaction-related expenses of $4.7 million. The pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2018, includes nonrecurring transaction-related expenses.
The unaudited pro forma financial information presented in the following table is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations that would have been achieved had the transaction taken place on the dates indicated, or the future consolidated results of operations of the combined companies.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating revenue, net | $ | 1,660,362 | | | $ | 1,668,022 | |
Net income | $ | 154,898 | | | $ | 170,224 | |
Cleco maintains operating and finance leases in its ordinary course of business activities.
Operating Leases
Cleco Power leases utility systems from 2 municipalities and 1 non-municipal public body. On July 9, 2019, one municipal lease was renewed for an additional term of 10 years and expires on August 11, 2031. The second municipal lease has a term of 10 years and expires on May 13, 2028. The non-municipal lease has a term of 27 years and expires on July 31, 2039. Each utility system lease contains fixed and variable components, as well as provisions for extensions.
Cleco Power has a lease for 113 railcars for coal transportation which expires on March 31, 2021. Cleco Cajun has a lease for 135 railcars for coal transportation, which commenced in February 2019 and was a short-term lease with an initial term of 12 months. On January 27, 2020, this lease was renewed and expires on March 31, 2021. This lease renews for additional one-month terms unless Cleco Cajun chooses to terminate. Cleco reassesses its need for the railcars upon the expiration of each term. Cleco pays a monthly rental fee per car. The railcar leases do not contain contingent rent payments.
Cleco Power has leases for 3 towboats in order to transport petroleum coke to Madison Unit 3. Each of the towboat leases has a term of 10 years and expires on March 31, 2028. Under these agreements, the rates are adjusted annually per the Producer Price Index. Each lease contains provisions for a five-year extension.
Cleco and Cleco Power’s remaining operating leases provide for office and operating facilities, office equipment, and tower rentals.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
The following is a schedule by year of future minimum lease payments due under Cleco and Cleco Power’s long-term operating leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | CLECO POWER | | CLECO |
Years ending Dec. 31, | | | |
2021 | $ | 3,543 | | | $ | 3,682 | |
2022 | 3,289 | | | 3,320 | |
2023 | 3,234 | | | 3,262 | |
2024 | 3,216 | | | 3,236 | |
2025 | 3,216 | | | 3,216 | |
Thereafter | 15,401 | | | 15,401 | |
Total minimum lease payments | 31,899 | | | 32,117 | |
Less: amount representing interest | 5,932 | | | 5,982 | |
Present value of net minimum operating lease payments | $ | 25,967 | | | $ | 26,135 | |
Current liabilities | $ | 2,672 | | | $ | 2,802 | |
Non-current liabilities | $ | 23,295 | | | $ | 23,333 | |
Finance Lease
In April 2018, Cleco Power entered into an agreement with Savage Inland Marine for continued use of 42 barges used to transport petroleum coke to Madison Unit 3 through March 2033. The agreement meets the accounting definition of a finance lease.
The barge lease rate contains both a fixed and variable component, of which the latter is adjusted every third anniversary of the agreement for estimated executory costs. If the barges are idle, the lessor is required to attempt to sublease the barges to third parties with the revenue reducing Cleco Power’s lease payment. This agreement contains a provision for early termination upon the occurrence of any 1 of 4 cancellation events.
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, Cleco Power paid $2.2 million, $2.2 million, and $2.0 million, respectively, in lease payments. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, Cleco Power received $0.8 million, $1.7 million, and $0.5 million, respectively, of revenue from subleases.
The following is an analysis of the leased property under the finance lease:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | AT DEC. 31, 2020 | | AT DEC. 31, 2019 |
Barges | $ | 16,800 | | | $ | 16,800 | |
Accumulated amortization | (3,080) | | | (1,960) | |
Net finance lease asset | $ | 13,720 | | | $ | 14,840 | |
The following is a schedule by year of future minimum lease payments due under the finance lease together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2020:
| | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | |
Years ending Dec. 31, | |
2021 | $ | 2,203 | |
2022 | 2,203 | |
2023 | 2,203 | |
2024 | 2,203 | |
2025 | 2,203 | |
Thereafter | 15,472 | |
Total minimum lease payments | 26,487 | |
Less: amount representing interest | 11,243 | |
Present value of net minimum finance lease payments | $ | 15,244 | |
Current liabilities | $ | 682 | |
Non-current liabilities | $ | 14,562 | |
Additional Lessee Disclosures
Cleco and Cleco Power’s total lease cost includes amounts on the income statement, as well as amounts capitalized as part of property, plant, or equipment or inventory. The following tables reflect total lease costs for Cleco and Cleco Power for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Finance lease cost | | | |
Amortization of ROU assets | $ | 1,120 | | | $ | 1,120 | |
Interest on lease liabilities | 1,587 | | | 1,646 | |
Operating lease cost | 4,576 | | | 4,528 | |
| | | |
Variable lease cost | 301 | | | 515 | |
| | | |
Total lease cost | $ | 7,584 | | | $ | 7,809 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Finance lease cost | | | |
Amortization of ROU assets | $ | 1,120 | | | $ | 1,120 | |
Interest on lease liabilities | 1,587 | | | 1,646 | |
Operating lease cost | 4,191 | | | 4,303 | |
| | | |
Variable lease cost | 301 | | | 515 | |
| | | |
Total lease cost | $ | 7,199 | | | $ | 7,584 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
The following tables present additional information related to Cleco and Cleco Power’s operating and finance leases as of and for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| | AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | BALANCE SHEET LINE ITEM | 2020 | | 2019 |
Supplemental balance sheet information | | | |
ROU assets | | | | |
Operating | Operating lease right of use assets | $ | 26,172 | | | $ | 28,791 | |
Finance | Property, plant, and equipment | 13,720 | | | 14,840 | |
Total ROU assets | $ | 39,892 | |
| $ | 43,631 | |
Current lease liabilities | | | |
Operating | Other current liabilities | $ | 2,802 | | | $ | 2,978 | |
Finance | Long-term debt and finance leases due within one year | 682 | | | 617 | |
Non-current lease liabilities | | | |
Operating | Operating lease liabilities | 23,333 | | | 25,779 | |
Finance | Long-term debt and finance leases, net | 14,562 | | | 15,244 | |
Total lease liabilities | $ | 41,379 | | | $ | 44,618 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| | AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | BALANCE SHEET LINE ITEM | 2020 | | 2019 |
Supplemental balance sheet information | | | |
ROU assets | | | | |
Operating | Operating lease right of use assets | $ | 26,006 | | | $ | 28,633 | |
Finance | Property, plant, and equipment | 13,720 | | | 14,840 | |
Total ROU assets | $ | 39,726 | |
| $ | 43,473 | |
Current lease liabilities | | | |
Operating | Other current liabilities | $ | 2,672 | | | $ | 2,935 | |
Finance | Long-term debt and finance leases due within one year | 682 | | | 617 | |
Non-current lease liabilities | | | |
Operating | Operating lease liabilities | 23,295 | | | 25,658 | |
Finance | Long-term debt and finance leases, net | 14,562 | | | 15,244 | |
Total lease liabilities | $ | 41,211 | | | $ | 44,454 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Supplemental cash flow information | | | |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities | | | |
Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | 4,504 | | | $ | 4,452 | |
Operating cash flows from finance leases | $ | 1,587 | | | $ | 1,646 | |
Financing cash flows from finance leases | $ | 617 | | | $ | 557 | |
ROU assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities | $ | 0 | | | $ | 15,881 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Supplemental cash flow information | | | |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities | | | |
Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | 4,120 | | | $ | 4,203 | |
Operating cash flows from finance leases | $ | 1,587 | | | $ | 1,646 | |
Financing cash flows from finance leases | $ | 617 | | | $ | 557 | |
ROU assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities | $ | 0 | | | $ | 15,749 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| | AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Other supplemental information | | | |
Operating leases | | | |
Weighted-average remaining lease term | 9.9 years | | 10.8 years |
Weighted-average discount rate | 4.31 | % | | 4.31 | % |
Finance leases | | | |
Weighted-average remaining lease term | 12.3 years | | 13.3 years |
Weighted-average discount rate | 10.18 | % | | 10.18 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| | AT DEC. 31, 2020 |
(THOUSANDS) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Other supplemental information | | | |
Operating leases | | | |
Weighted-average remaining lease term | 10.0 years | | 10.8 years |
Weighted-average discount rate | 4.31 | % | | 4.31 | % |
Finance leases | | | |
Weighted-average remaining lease term | 12.3 years | | 13.3 years |
Weighted-average discount rate | 10.18 | % | | 10.18 | % |
Cottonwood Sale Leaseback Agreement
Upon closing the Cleco Cajun Transaction, the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback was executed. Under the terms of the lease, NRG Energy will operate the Cottonwood Plant, incur all costs, and receive all revenues from the operations of the plant. Cottonwood Energy will receive fixed lease payments of $40.0 million per year and variable lease payments for LTSA costs and property taxes paid by NRG Energy on behalf of Cleco. Cleco may terminate the lease contract under specific circumstances stated in the lease contract. The residual value under the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback is expected to be recovered through sales of power generation from the plant. The residual value of the Cottonwood Plant has been determined using the plant’s estimated economic life.
Cleco Cajun is Cleco’s only entity with lessor arrangements. Cleco Cajun’s lease income under the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Fixed payments | $ | 40,000 | | | $ | 36,667 | |
Variable payments | 20,883 | | | 20,415 | |
Amortization of deferred lease liability(1) | 9,205 | | | 8,438 | |
Total lease income | $ | 70,088 | | | $ | 65,520 | |
(1)The deferred lease revenue resulting from the fair value of the lease between Cottonwood Energy and a special-purpose entity that is a subsidiary of NRG Energy.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
The remaining minimum lease payments to be received under the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback are as follows:
| | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | |
Years ending Dec. 31, | |
2021 | $ | 40,000 | |
2022 | 40,000 | |
2023 | 40,000 | |
2024 | 40,000 | |
2025 | 16,667 | |
Total payments | $ | 176,667 | |
Depreciation expense associated with Cleco’s property under the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback for the year ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, was $29.3 million and $22.7 million, respectively. Cleco calculated depreciation on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset. Property associated with the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Property, plant, and equipment | $ | 552,659 | | | $ | 540,409 | |
Accumulated depreciation | (52,053) | | | (22,741) | |
Net property, plant, and equipment | $ | 500,606 | | | $ | 517,668 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 5 — Revenue Recognition |
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Retail Utility Revenue
Cleco’s retail revenue from contracts with customers is generated primarily from Cleco Power’s regulated revenue from residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Cleco Power recognizes retail revenue from these contracts as a series, and progress towards satisfaction of the performance obligation is measured using an output method based on kWh delivered. Accordingly, revenue from electricity sales is recognized as energy is delivered to the customer. Cleco Power bills retail customers, based on rates regulated by the LPSC, on a monthly basis with payments generally due within 20 days of the invoice date.
Included in Cleco Power’s retail revenue is unbilled electric revenue, which represents the amount customers will be billed for services rendered from the meter reading from the most recent bill to the end of the respective accounting period. Cleco Power uses actual customer energy consumption data available from AMI to calculate unbilled revenue. Also included in Cleco Power’s retail revenue is electric customer credits, which primarily represents the accrued estimated refunds to Cleco Power’s retail customers for the tax related benefits of the TCJA.
Wholesale Revenue
Cleco’s wholesale revenue is generated primarily through the sale of energy and capacity to cooperatives and municipalities. The electricity revenue performance obligations, representing both energy and capacity, are satisfied as a
series of performance obligations, and progress towards satisfaction of the performance obligations are measured using an output method. The energy performance obligation measure of progress is based on kWh delivered. The capacity performance obligation measure of progress is based on time elapsed and is recognized each month as Cleco’s generating units stand ready to deliver electricity to the customer. Cleco recognizes wholesale revenue, inclusive of both performance obligations, under the invoice practical expedient for the amount Cleco has the right to invoice. Cleco, through Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun, charges its wholesale customers market based rates that are subject to FERC’s triennial market power analysis. Cleco also enters into transactions through MISO for spot energy sales which are transacted in the Day-Ahead Energy and Operating Reserves Market and the Real-Time Energy and Operating Reserves Market.
Transmission Revenue
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun earn transmission revenues pursuant to MISO’s FERC filed tariff. The performance obligation of transmission service is satisfied as service is provided. Revenue from the transmission of electricity for Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun is recorded based on a separate FERC-approved annual filing rate mechanism effective June 1 of each year. These rates are based on the respective costs to provide transmission services.
Other Revenue
Other revenue from contracts with customers, which is not a significant source of Cleco’s revenue, consisted of customer-forfeited discounts and reconnect fees, electric property rental, and other miscellaneous fees. For 2019 and 2018, other revenue includes Cleco Power’s Teche Unit 3 SSR revenue. The performance obligation under these contracts is satisfied and revenue is recognized as control of the products is delivered or services are rendered.
Revenue Unrelated to Contracts with Customers
Cleco’s energy-related transactions with the following characteristics qualify as derivative contracts and are recorded pursuant to derivatives and hedging accounting guidance: a) their value is based on the notional amount or payment provisions of an underlying asset; b) they require no or a diminutive initial net investment; and c) their terms require or permit net settlement.
Cleco Cajun’s other revenue includes fixed lease payments and certain variable payments for costs paid by NRG Energy on behalf of Cleco. For more information on the Cottonwood lease agreement, see Note 4 — “Leases — Lessor Agreements — Cottonwood Sale Leaseback Agreement.”
Disaggregated Revenue
Upon the completion of the Cleco Cajun Transaction on February 4, 2019, Cleco Cajun became a reportable segment. For more information on the Cleco Cajun Transaction, see Note 3 — “Business Combinations.”
Operating revenue, net for the year ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2020 |
(THOUSANDS) | CLECO POWER | | CLECO CAJUN | | OTHER | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL |
Revenue from contracts with customers | | | | | | | | | |
Retail revenue | | | | | | | | | |
Residential (1) | $ | 402,050 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 402,050 | |
Commercial (1) | 256,964 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 256,964 | |
Industrial (1) | 137,920 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 137,920 | |
Other retail (1) | 14,235 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 14,235 | |
Surcharge | 2,440 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 2,440 | |
Electric customer credits | (52,208) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (52,208) | |
Total retail revenue | 761,401 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 761,401 | |
Wholesale, net | 192,187 | | (1) | 365,555 | | | (9,680) | | (2) | 0 | | | 548,062 | |
Transmission, net | 49,164 | | (3) | 51,449 | | (4) | 0 | | | (6,463) | | | 94,150 | |
Other | 15,162 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1 | | | 15,163 | |
Affiliate (5) | 5,156 | | | 204 | | | 129,126 | | | (134,486) | | | 0 | |
Total revenue from contracts with customers | 1,023,070 | | | 417,208 | | | 119,446 | | | (140,948) | | | 1,418,776 | |
Revenue unrelated to contracts with customers | | | | | | | | | |
Other | 9,222 | | (6) | 70,145 | | (7) | 3 | | | 0 | | | 79,370 | |
Total revenue unrelated to contracts with customers | 9,222 | | | 70,145 | | | 3 | | | 0 | | | 79,370 | |
Operating revenue, net | $ | 1,032,292 | | | $ | 487,353 | | | $ | 119,449 | | | $ | (140,948) | | | $ | 1,498,146 | |
(1) Includes fuel recovery revenue.
(2) Amortization of intangible assets related to Cleco Power’s wholesale power supply agreements.
(3) Includes $0.9 million of electric customer credits.
(4) Includes $0.2 million of electric customer credits.
(5) Includes interdepartmental rents and support services. This revenue is eliminated upon consolidation.
(6) Represents realized gains associated with FTRs.
(7) Includes $60.9 million in lease revenue related to the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback and $9.2 million of deferred lease revenue amortization.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2019 |
(THOUSANDS) | CLECO POWER | | CLECO CAJUN | | OTHER | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL |
Revenue from contracts with customers | | | | | | | | | |
Retail revenue | | | | | | | | | |
Residential (1) | $ | 415,242 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 415,242 | |
Commercial (1) | 289,197 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 289,197 | |
Industrial (1) | 149,711 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 149,711 | |
Other retail (1) | 15,046 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 15,046 | |
Surcharge | 22,132 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 22,132 | |
Electric customer credits | (35,880) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (35,880) | |
Total retail revenue | 855,448 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 855,448 | |
Wholesale, net | 226,978 | | (1) | 374,635 | | (2) | (9,680) | | (3) | (1) | | | 591,932 | |
Transmission | 50,874 | | (4) | 51,315 | | (5) | 0 | | | (7,471) | | | 94,718 | |
Other | 19,324 | | (6) | 0 | | | 2 | | | 0 | | | 19,326 | |
Affiliate (7) | 3,125 | | | 108 | | | 109,067 | | | (112,300) | | | 0 | |
Total revenue from contracts with customers | 1,155,749 | | | 426,058 | | | 99,389 | | | (119,772) | | | 1,561,424 | |
Revenue unrelated to contracts with customers | | | | | | | | | |
Other | 12,621 | | (8) | 65,560 | | (9) | 0 | | | 0 | | | 78,181 | |
Total revenue unrelated to contracts with customers | 12,621 | | | 65,560 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 78,181 | |
Operating revenue, net | $ | 1,168,370 | | | $ | 491,618 | | | $ | 99,389 | | | $ | (119,772) | | | $ | 1,639,605 | |
(1) Includes fuel recovery revenue.
(2) Includes $0.8 million of electric customer credits.
(3) Amortization of intangible assets related to Cleco Power’s wholesale power supply agreements.
(4) Includes $2.6 million of electric customer credits.
(5) Includes $0.7 million of electric customer credits.
(6) Includes $16.1 million of other miscellaneous fee revenue and $3.2 million of Teche Unit 3 SSR revenue.
(7) Includes interdepartmental rents and support services. This revenue is eliminated upon consolidation.
(8) Includes realized gains associated with FTRs of $12.4 million and LCFC revenue of $0.2 million.
(9) Includes $57.1 million in lease revenue related to the Cottonwood Sale Leaseback and $8.4 million of deferred lease revenue amortization.
Cleco and Cleco Power have unsatisfied performance obligations with durations ranging between 1 and 14 years that primarily relate to stand-ready obligations as part of fixed capacity minimums. At December 31, 2020, Cleco and Cleco Power had $73.2 million of unsatisfied fixed performance obligations that will be recognized as revenue over the term of such contracts as the stand-ready obligation to provide energy is provided.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 6 — Regulatory Assets and Liabilities |
Cleco Power capitalizes or defers certain costs for recovery from customers and recognizes a liability for amounts expected to be returned to customers based on regulatory approval and management’s ongoing assessment that it is probable these items will be recovered or refunded through the ratemaking process.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Under the current regulatory environment, Cleco Power believes these regulatory assets will be fully recoverable; however, if in the future, as a result of regulatory changes or competition, Cleco Power’s ability to recover these regulatory assets would no longer be probable, then to the extent that such regulatory assets were determined not to be recoverable, Cleco Power would be required to write-down such assets. In addition, potential deregulation of the industry or possible future changes in the method of rate regulation of Cleco Power could require discontinuance of the application of the authoritative guidance of regulated operations.
The following table summarizes Cleco Power’s regulatory assets and liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, | | REMAINING RECOVERY PERIOD (YRS.) |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Regulatory assets | | | | | |
Acadia Unit 1 acquisition costs | $ | 2,019 | | | $ | 2,124 | | | 19 |
Accumulated deferred fuel | 28,194 | | | 22,910 | | | * |
AFUDC equity gross-up (1) | 69,670 | | | 72,766 | | | * |
AMI deferred revenue requirement | 2,591 | | | 3,136 | | | 5 |
AROs | 5,488 | | | 3,668 | | | * |
Coughlin transaction costs | 876 | | | 906 | | | 28.5 |
COVID-19 executive order | 2,953 | | | 0 | | | * |
Deferred storm restoration costs - Hurricane Delta | 17,051 | | | 0 | | | * |
Deferred storm restoration costs - Hurricane Laura | 54,406 | | | 0 | | | * |
Deferred storm restoration costs - Hurricane Zeta | 3,493 | | | 0 | | | * |
Dolet Hills closure costs | 48,982 | | | 0 | | | * |
Emergency declarations | 270 | | | 1,349 | | | 0.5 |
Energy efficiency | 2,820 | | | 2,820 | | | 2 |
Financing costs | 7,184 | | | 7,554 | | | * |
Interest costs | 3,708 | | | 3,958 | | | * |
| | | | | |
Non-service cost of postretirement benefits | 9,901 | | | 6,739 | | | * |
Other | 4,229 | | | 987 | | | * |
Postretirement costs | 165,437 | | | 151,543 | | | * |
Production operations and maintenance expenses | 4,058 | | | 7,985 | | | * |
Rodemacher Unit 2 closure costs | 1,333 | | | 0 | | | * |
St. Mary Clean Energy Center | 3,479 | | | 0 | | | * |
Surcredits, net (1) | 0 | | | 145 | | | * |
Training costs | 6,085 | | | 6,241 | | | 39 |
Tree trimming costs | 11,807 | | | 11,341 | | | * |
Total regulatory assets | 456,034 | | | 306,172 | | | |
Regulatory liabilities | | | | | |
AFUDC | (4,218) | | | 0 | | | * |
Corporate franchise tax, net | (763) | | | (1,145) | | | * |
Deferred taxes, net | (175,584) | | | (146,948) | | | * |
Other | 0 | | | (834) | | | * |
St. Mary Clean Energy Center | 0 | | | (4,696) | | | * |
Total regulatory liabilities | (180,565) | | | (153,623) | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total regulatory assets, net | $ | 275,469 | | | $ | 152,549 | | | |
(1)Represents regulatory assets for past expenditures that were not earning a return on investment at December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. All other assets are earning a return on investment. * For information related to the remaining recovery periods, refer to the following disclosures for each specific regulatory asset. |
The following table summarizes Cleco’s net regulatory assets and liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Total Cleco Power regulatory assets, net | $ | 275,469 | | | $ | 152,549 | |
2016 Merger adjustments (1) | | | |
Fair value of long-term debt | 119,553 | | | 127,977 | |
Postretirement costs | 15,411 | | | 17,399 | |
Financing costs | 7,592 | | | 7,935 | |
Debt issuance costs | 5,254 | | | 5,665 | |
Total Cleco regulatory assets, net | $ | 423,279 | | | $ | 311,525 | |
(1) Cleco regulatory assets include acquisition accounting adjustments as a result of the 2016 Merger.
Acadia Unit 1 Acquisition Costs
In 2009, the LPSC approved Cleco Power’s request to establish a regulatory asset for costs incurred as a result of the acquisition by Cleco Power of Acadia Unit 1 and half of Acadia Power Station’s related common facilities. The Acadia Unit 1 acquisition costs are being recovered over a 30-year period beginning February 2010.
Accumulated Deferred Fuel
Cleco Power is allowed to recover the cost of fuel used for electric generation and power purchased for utility customers through the LPSC-established FAC or related wholesale contract provisions, which enable Cleco Power to pass on to its customers substantially all such charges. The difference between fuel and purchased power revenues collected from retail and wholesale customers and the current fuel and purchased power costs is generally recorded as Accumulated deferred fuel on Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. For 2020, approximately 76% of Cleco Power’s total fuel cost was regulated by the LPSC.
AFUDC Equity Gross-Up
Cleco Power capitalizes equity AFUDC as a cost component of construction projects. Cleco Power has recorded a regulatory asset to recover the tax gross-up related to the equity component of AFUDC. These costs are being amortized over the estimated lives of the respective assets constructed.
AMI Deferred Revenue Requirement
In February 2011, the LPSC approved Cleco Power’s stipulated settlement in Docket No. U-31393 allowing Cleco Power to defer the estimated revenue requirements for the AMI project as a regulatory asset. In June 2014, the LPSC approved Cleco Power’s recovery of the AMI regulatory asset over the average life of the AMI meters, or 11 years. In July 2014, Cleco Power began recovering the AMI deferred revenue requirement.
AROs
Cleco Power recorded an ARO liability for the retirement of certain ash disposal facilities. The ARO regulatory asset represents the accretion of the ARO liability and the depreciation of the related assets. For more information on the accounting treatment of Cleco Power’s AROs, see Note 2 — “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — AROs.”
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Coughlin Transaction Costs
In January 2014, the LPSC authorized Cleco Power to create a regulatory asset for the transaction costs related to the transfer of Coughlin from Evangeline to Cleco Power. The Coughlin transaction costs are being recovered over a 35-year period beginning July 2014.
COVID-19 Executive Order
On March 13, 2020, the LPSC issued an executive order prohibiting the disconnection of utilities for nonpayment. This order resulted in an increase of expenses and a loss of revenue for Cleco Power. On April 29, 2020, the LPSC issued an order allowing utilities to establish a regulatory asset for expenses incurred from the suspension of disconnections and collection of late fees imposed by the LPSC executive order. On July 1, 2020, the LPSC issued an order terminating the moratorium on disconnections effective July 16, 2020. Cleco began resuming disconnections and late fees and utilizing collection agencies on October 1, 2020. On December 4, 2020, Cleco Power made a filing with the LPSC requesting the recovery of the regulatory asset as well as the costs associated with the disconnect fees and incremental costs over a four-year period. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had a regulatory asset of $3.0 million for expenses incurred.
Deferred Storm Restoration Costs
On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall in southwest Louisiana as a Category 4 storm, causing power outages for approximately 140,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and southwest Louisiana.
On October 9, 2020, Hurricane Delta made landfall in southwest Louisiana as a Category 2 storm, causing peak power outages for approximately 132,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and south Louisiana.
On October 28, 2020, Hurricane Zeta made landfall in southeast Louisiana as a Category 2 storm, causing peak power outages for approximately 73,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in southeast Louisiana.
The LPSC approved utilities establishing a regulatory asset to track and defer non-capital expenses associated with the hurricanes. On December 4, 2020, Cleco Power made a filing with the LPSC requesting interim rate recovery for return on certain storm damage costs until such time that securitization of the costs associated with Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta can be completed. For more information about Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta, see Note 19 — “Storm Restoration.”
Dolet Hills Closure Costs
In June 2020, Cleco Power revised depreciation rates for the Dolet Hills Power Station to utilize the December 2021 expected end-of-life and early closure of the Dolet Hills Power Station and defer depreciation expense to a regulatory asset for the amount in excess of the previously LPSC-approved depreciation rates. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $49.0 million deferred as a regulatory asset for accelerated depreciation.
Cleco Power anticipates filing an application in March 2021 with the LPSC giving notice that the Dolet Hills Power Station will be retired at the end of 2021 and requesting the approval of the regulatory treatment and recovery of the stranded costs and decommissioning costs over 20 years. For
more information on the Dolet Hills Power Station, see Note 15 — “Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — Risks and Uncertainties.”
Emergency Declarations
In August 2016, the LPSC issued emergency declaration executive orders following flooding events in south Louisiana which prohibited public utilities from disconnecting or charging late fees to customers for non-payment in affected parishes. In January 2017, the LPSC issued an order that terminated the executive orders effective March 1, 2017, and allowed public utilities to formally petition the LPSC to recover lost revenues as a result of the executive orders. In July 2017, Cleco Power began recovering lost revenues associated with the flooding events and expects the regulatory assets to be fully amortized by June 2021.
Energy Efficiency
In December 2018, Cleco Power filed a letter of intent with the LPSC to recover the under recovery of the accumulated decrease in revenues, also known as the LCFC, associated with the energy efficiency program for years 2014 through 2018 to be recovered over a four-year period. Cleco Power began collecting the accumulated LCFC revenues in Cleco Power’s energy efficiency rates effective March 1, 2019. On October 21, 2019, Cleco Power received notice of approval from the LPSC allowing recovery of the accumulated LCFC revenues.
Financing Costs
In 2011, Cleco Power entered into and settled 2 treasury rate locks. Of the $26.8 million in settlements, $7.4 million was deferred as a regulatory asset relating to ineffectiveness of the hedge relationships. Also in 2011, Cleco Power entered into a forward starting swap contract. These derivatives were entered into in order to mitigate the interest rate exposure on coupon payments related to forecasted debt issuances. In May 2013, the forward starting interest rate swap was settled at a loss of $3.3 million. Cleco Power deferred $2.9 million of the losses as a regulatory asset, which is being amortized over the terms of the related debt issuances.
Interest Costs
Cleco Power’s deferred interest costs include additional deferred capital construction financing costs authorized by the LPSC. These costs are being amortized over the estimated lives of the respective assets.
Non-Service Cost of Postretirement Benefits
On January 1, 2018, FASB’s amended guidance related to defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans became effective. The amendment allows only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization within property, plant, and equipment. Beginning January 1, 2018, Cleco Power’s non-service cost previously eligible for capitalization into property, plant, and equipment are being deferred to a regulatory asset and will be amortized over the estimated lives of the respective assets.
Other Regulatory Assets (Liabilities), Net
At December 31, 2020, Other, net consisted of a $3.9 million regulatory asset for the Coughlin Pipeline revenue requirement and a $0.3 million regulatory asset for the increase in revenue
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
requirements resulting from the decrease in excess ADIT used to fund the TCJA bill credits. The regulatory liability for the LPSC Cleco Cajun Transaction commitment was fully amortized during 2020.
In June 2017, the LPSC approved the establishment of a regulatory asset upon the completion of the Coughlin Pipeline project for the revenue requirement associated with the project until Cleco Power seeks recovery in the new FRP with the completion of the rate case. Cleco Power anticipates collecting this amount over 12 months, subject to regulatory approval of Cleco Power’s new FRP.
On November 13, 2020, the LPSC approved the establishment of a regulatory asset for the increase in revenue requirements caused by the increase in rate base as the excess ADIT balances decrease. The mechanism to collect the balance of this regulatory asset will be determined in Cleco Power’s current LPSC base rate case. Cleco Power’s current base rate case is ongoing and management is unable to determine its outcome. On November 30, 2020, Cleco Power received approval of its application to extend the TCJA bill credits from November 30, 2020, until such time that the rate case is complete. For more information about the excess ADIT, see Note 13 — “Regulation and Rates — TCJA.”
In January 2019, the LPSC approved the Cleco Cajun Transaction. Approval of the Cleco Cajun Transaction was conditioned upon certain commitments, including a $4.0 million annual reduction to Cleco Power’s retail customer rates. For the period from February 4, 2019, to June 30, 2019, Cleco Power recorded a regulatory liability for the annual reduction until the July 1, 2019, FRP rate adjustment reflected the annual savings. Also on July 1, 2019, Cleco Power began amortizing the regulatory liability over 12 months. In June 2020, Cleco Power had fully amortized the regulatory liability. Due to the delay in the current base rate case, Cleco Power continues to charge FRP rates established in July 2019.
Postretirement Costs
Cleco Power recognizes the funded status of its postretirement benefit plans as a net liability or asset. The net liability or asset is defined as the difference between the benefit obligation and the fair market value of plan assets. For defined benefit pension plans, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation. Historically, the LPSC has allowed Cleco Power to recover pension plan expense. Cleco Power, therefore, recognizes a regulatory asset based on its determination that these costs can be collected from customers. These costs are amortized to pension expense over the average service life of the remaining plan participants (approximately seven years as of December 31, 2020, for Cleco’s plan) when it exceeds certain thresholds. The amount and timing of the recovery will be based on the changing funded status of the pension plan in future periods. For more information on Cleco’s pension plan and adoption of these authoritative guidelines, see Note 10 — “Pension Plan and Employee Benefits.”
Production Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Annually, Cleco Power is allowed to defer, as a regulatory asset, production operations and maintenance expenses, net of fuel and payroll, above the retail jurisdictional portion of $45.0 million, adjusted annually for a growth factor (deferral threshold). The amount of the regulatory asset is capped at $23.0 million. The LPSC allows Cleco Power to recover the amount deferred in any calendar year over the following three-
year regulatory period, beginning on July 1, when the annual rates are set. Cleco Power had no deferral in 2020 or 2019.
Rodemacher Unit 2 Closure Costs
As a result of environmental regulations, Cleco Power revised Rodemacher Unit 2’s expected end-of-life to coincide with its application to the EPA for an alternative closure date of October 17, 2028. Rodemacher Unit 2’s depreciation expense in excess of the previously LPSC-approved depreciation rates are deferred to a regulatory asset. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $1.3 million deferred as a regulatory asset for accelerated depreciation.
St. Mary Clean Energy Center
On July 1, 2018, Cleco Power began collecting the revenue requirements related to the St. Mary Clean Energy Center project based on expected commercial operations in the third quarter of 2018. Due to the delay in commercial operations, Cleco Power recorded a $9.6 million regulatory liability for over collections for the 12-month period ending June 30, 2019. On July 1, 2019, Cleco Power’s rider FRP rates were adjusted by the amount of the over collection and the liability was amortized over a period of 12 months. Due to the delay in the current base rate case, Cleco Power continues to charge FRP rates established in July 2019, which includes a portion of the revenue requirements adjusted by the over collections. On February 12, 2021, Cleco Power received its first set of data requests from the LPSC. Cleco Power had a regulatory asset of $3.5 million at December 31, 2020, for the resulting under collection of revenue related to St. Mary Clean Energy Center project.
Surcredits, Net
Cleco Power has recorded surcredits as the result of a settlement with the LPSC that addressed, among other things, the recovery of the storm damages related to hurricanes and uncertain tax positions. In the settlement, Cleco Power was required to implement surcredits to provide ratepayers with the economic benefit of the carrying charges of certain ADIT liabilities at a rate of return which was set by the LPSC. The settlement, through a true-up mechanism, allows the surcredits to be adjusted to reflect the actual tax deductions allowed by the IRS.
Cleco Power recorded a true-up to the surcredits to reflect the actual tax deductions allowed by the IRS for storm damages and uncertain tax positions. As a result of the true-ups, Cleco Power recorded a regulatory asset that represents excess surcredits refunded to customers that were collected from ratepayers and amortized over a four-year period, through June 2018. Cleco Power began collecting the balance as part of the July 1, 2019, FRP rate adjustment.
Training Costs
In 2008, the LPSC approved Cleco Power’s request to establish a regulatory asset for training costs associated with existing processes and technology for new employees at Madison Unit 3. Recovery of these expenditures was approved by the LPSC in 2009. In 2010, Cleco Power began amortizing the regulatory asset over a 50-year period.
Tree Trimming Costs
In October 2016, the LPSC approved Cleco Power to defer and recover through its base rates tree trimming costs. The LPSC authorized a deferral up to $10.9 million, excluding debt
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
carrying costs. Cleco Power is currently collecting deferred tree trimming costs through its base rates and expects them to be fully amortized by 2026.
Cleco Holdings’ 2016 Merger Adjustments
As a result of the 2016 Merger, Cleco implemented acquisition accounting, which eliminated AOCI at the Cleco consolidated level on the date of the 2016 Merger. Cleco will continue to recover expenses related to certain postretirement costs; therefore, Cleco recognized a regulatory asset based on its determination that these costs can continue to be collected from customers. These costs will be amortized to Other operations expense over the average remaining service period of participating employees. Cleco will also continue to recover financing costs associated with the settlement of 2 treasury rate locks and a forward starting swap contract that were previously recognized in AOCI. Additionally, as a result of the 2016 Merger, a regulatory asset was recorded for debt issuance costs that were eliminated at Cleco and a regulatory asset was recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of long-term debt. These regulatory assets are being amortized over the terms of the related debt issuances, unless the debt is redeemed prior to maturity, at which time any unamortized related regulatory asset will be derecognized.
AFUDC
The capitalization of AFUDC by Cleco Power is a utility accounting practice prescribed by FERC and the LPSC. AFUDC represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance construction of new and existing facilities. While cash is not realized currently from such allowance, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement over the same life of the plant through a higher rate base and higher depreciation. Under regulatory practices, a return on and recovery of AFUDC is permitted in setting rates charged for utility services. For 2020, Cleco Power’s average short-term debt balance exceeded its average construction work-in-progress balance; however, Cleco Power elected the FERC capital structure waiver contained in FERC Docket Number AC20-127-000. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had a regulatory liability of $4.2 million for the retail portion of AFUDC calculated under the FERC waiver.
Corporate Franchise Tax, Net
As part of the FRP extension approved by the LPSC in June 2014, Cleco Power was authorized to recover through a rider the retail portion of state corporate franchise taxes paid. The retail portion of state corporate franchise taxes paid each year will be recovered over 12 months beginning July 1 of the following year.
Deferred Taxes, Net
The regulatory assets and liabilities recorded for deferred income taxes represent the effect of tax benefits or detriments that must be flowed through to customers as they are received or paid. The amounts deferred are attributable to differences between book and tax recovery periods. In 2017, the TCJA was enacted. Changes in the IRC, as amended, from the TCJA, had a material impact on the Registrants’ financial statements in 2017. Tax effects of changes in tax laws must be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted. Also, deferred tax assets and liabilities must be measured at the enacted tax rate expected to apply when temporary differences are to be realized or settled. At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco and Cleco Power had $352.4 million and $375.0 million, respectively, accrued for the excess ADIT. For more information on the status of the TCJA regulatory liability, see Note 13 — “Regulation and Rates — TCJA.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 7 — Jointly Owned Generation Units |
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun operate electric generation units that are jointly owned with other utilities. The joint-owners are responsible for their own share of the capital and the operating and maintenance costs of the respective units. Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun are responsible for their own share of the direct expenses of their respective jointly owned generation units. Cleco Power’s share of expenses is included in the operating expenses on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Cleco Cajun’s share of expenses is included in the operating expenses on Cleco’s Consolidated Statement of Income.
At December 31, 2020, the investment in and accumulated depreciation for each generating unit on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | | | | | |
| | | AT DEC. 31, 2020 |
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES AND MW) | RODEMACHER UNIT 2 | | DOLET HILLS POWER STATION | | BAYOU COVE | | BIG CAJUN II - UNIT 3 | | TOTAL |
Utility plant in service | $ | 75,958 | | | $ | 186,971 | | | $ | 40,421 | | | $ | 15,787 | | | $ | 319,137 | |
Accumulated depreciation | $ | 10,932 | | | $ | 86,030 | | | $ | 4,479 | | | $ | 1,968 | | | $ | 103,409 | |
Construction work in progress | $ | 1,090 | | | $ | 2,548 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 916 | | | $ | 4,554 | |
Ownership interest percentage | 30 | % | | 50 | % | | 75 | % | | 58 | % | | |
Rated capacity (MW) | 523 | | | 650 | | | 300 | | | 588 | | | |
Ownership interest (MW) | 157 | | | 325 | | | 225 | | | 341 | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | |
| | | AT DEC. 31, 2020 |
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES AND MW) | RODEMACHER UNIT 2 | | DOLET HILLS POWER STATION | | TOTAL |
Utility plant in service | $ | 150,138 | | | $ | 404,467 | | | $ | 554,605 | |
Accumulated depreciation | $ | 85,112 | | | $ | 303,526 | | | $ | 388,638 | |
Construction work in progress | $ | 1,090 | | | $ | 2,548 | | | $ | 3,638 | |
Ownership interest percentage | 30 | % | | 50 | % | | |
Rated capacity (MW) | 523 | | | 650 | | | |
Ownership interest (MW) | 157 | | | 325 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 8 — Fair Value Accounting |
The amounts reflected in Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2020, and 2019, for cash equivalents, restricted cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other accounts receivable, short-term debt, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of their short-term nature. Cleco applies the provisions of the fair value measurement standard to its non-recurring, non-financial measurements including business combinations as well as impairment related to goodwill and other long-lived assets.
The following tables summarize the carrying value and estimated market value of Cleco and Cleco Power’s financial instruments not measured at fair value on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
(THOUSANDS) | CARRYING VALUE* | | FAIR VALUE | | CARRYING VALUE* | | FAIR VALUE |
Long-term debt | $ | 3,230,500 | | | $ | 3,541,349 | | | $ | 3,188,664 | | | $ | 3,371,915 | |
* The carrying value of long-term debt does not include deferred issuance costs of $13.4 million at December 31, 2020, and $13.7 million at December 31, 2019.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
(THOUSANDS) | CARRYING VALUE* | | FAIR VALUE | | CARRYING VALUE* | | FAIR VALUE |
Long-term debt | $ | 1,494,947 | | | $ | 1,794,799 | | | $ | 1,380,688 | | | $ | 1,601,865 | |
* The carrying value of long-term debt does not include deferred issuance costs of $7.0 million at December 31, 2020, and $7.4 million at December 31, 2019.
In order to fund capital requirements, Cleco issues fixed and variable rate long-term debt with various tenors. The fair value of this class fluctuates as the market interest rates for fixed and variable rate debt with similar tenors and credit ratings change. The fair value of the debt could also change from period to period due to changes in the credit rating of the Cleco entity by which the debt was issued. The fair value of long-term debt is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
Cleco classifies assets and liabilities that are measured at their fair value according to three different levels depending on the inputs used in determining fair value.
The following tables disclose for Cleco and Cleco Power the fair value of financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT REPORTING DATE |
(THOUSANDS) | AT DEC. 31, 2020 | | QUOTED PRICES IN ACTIVE MARKETS FOR IDENTICAL ASSETS (LEVEL 1) | | SIGNIFICANT OTHER OBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 2) | | SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 3) | | AT DEC. 31, 2019 | | QUOTED PRICES IN ACTIVE MARKETS FOR IDENTICAL ASSETS (LEVEL 1) | | SIGNIFICANT OTHER OBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 2) | | SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 3) |
Asset Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional money market funds | $ | 86,001 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 86,001 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 129,643 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 129,643 | | | $ | 0 | |
FTRs | 4,805 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 4,805 | | | 6,822 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 6,822 | |
Other commodity derivatives | 8,599 | | | 0 | | | 8,599 | | | 0 | | | 201 | | | 0 | | | 201 | | | 0 | |
Total assets | $ | 99,405 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 94,600 | | | $ | 4,805 | | | $ | 136,666 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 129,844 | | | $ | 6,822 | |
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FTRs | $ | 1,625 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,625 | | | $ | 1,044 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,044 | |
Other commodity derivatives | 1,612 | | | 0 | | | 1,612 | | | 0 | | | 5,373 | | | 0 | | | 5,373 | | | 0 | |
Total liabilities | $ | 3,237 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,612 | | | $ | 1,625 | | | $ | 6,417 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 5,373 | | | $ | 1,044 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT REPORTING DATE |
(THOUSANDS) | AT DEC. 31, 2020 | | QUOTED PRICES IN ACTIVE MARKETS FOR IDENTICAL ASSETS (LEVEL 1) | | SIGNIFICANT OTHER OBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 2) | | SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 3) | | AT DEC. 31, 2019 | | QUOTED PRICES IN ACTIVE MARKETS FOR IDENTICAL ASSETS (LEVEL 1) | | SIGNIFICANT OTHER OBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 2) | | SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 3) |
Asset Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional money market funds | $ | 25,357 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 25,357 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 74,903 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 74,903 | | | $ | 0 | |
FTRs | 4,337 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 4,337 | | | 6,311 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 6,311 | |
Total assets | $ | 29,694 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 25,357 | | | $ | 4,337 | | | $ | 81,214 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 74,903 | | | $ | 6,311 | |
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FTRs | $ | 1,121 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,121 | | | $ | 586 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 586 | |
Total liabilities | $ | 1,121 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,121 | | | $ | 586 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 586 | |
The following tables summarize the net changes in the net fair value of FTR assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for Cleco and Cleco Power:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Beginning balance | $ | 5,778 | | | $ | 22,887 | |
Unrealized (losses) gains * | 187 | | | (1,659) | |
Purchases | 11,333 | | | 27,881 | |
Settlements | (14,118) | | | (43,331) | |
Ending balance | $ | 3,180 | | | $ | 5,778 | |
* Cleco Power’s unrealized (losses) gains are reported through Accumulated deferred fuel on Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Cleco Cajun’s unrealized (losses) gains are reported through Purchased power on Cleco’s Consolidated Income Statement. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Beginning balance | $ | 5,725 | | | $ | 22,887 | |
Unrealized (losses) gains * | 450 | | | (945) | |
Purchases | 9,378 | | | 21,609 | |
Settlements | (12,337) | | | (37,826) | |
Ending balance | $ | 3,216 | | | $ | 5,725 | |
* Unrealized gains (losses) are reported through Accumulated deferred fuel on Cleco Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
The following tables quantify the significant unobservable inputs used in developing the fair value of Level 3 positions for Cleco and Cleco Power as of December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FAIR VALUE | | VALUATION TECHNIQUE | | SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS | | FORWARD PRICE RANGE |
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT DOLLAR PER MWh) | Assets | | Liabilities | | | | | | Low | | High |
FTRs at December 31, 2020 | $ | 4,805 | | | $ | 1,625 | | | RTO auction pricing | | FTR price - per MWh | | $ | (3.49) | | | $ | 4.36 | |
FTRs at December 31, 2019 | $ | 6,822 | | | $ | 1,044 | | | RTO auction pricing | | FTR price - per MWh | | $ | (2.57) | | | $ | 2.86 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FAIR VALUE | | VALUATION TECHNIQUE | | SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS | | FORWARD PRICE RANGE |
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT DOLLAR PER MWh) | Assets | | Liabilities | | | | | | Low | | High |
FTRs at December 31, 2020 | $ | 4,337 | | | $ | 1,121 | | | RTO auction pricing | | FTR price - per MWh | | $ | (3.34) | | | $ | 4.36 | |
FTRs at December 31, 2019 | $ | 6,311 | | | $ | 586 | | | RTO auction pricing | | FTR price - per MWh | | $ | (2.04) | | | $ | 2.86 | |
Cleco utilizes different valuation techniques for fair value calculations. In order to measure the fair value for Level 1 assets and liabilities, Cleco obtains the closing price from published indices in active markets for the various instruments and multiplies this price by the appropriate volume of instruments held. Level 2 fair values are determined by obtaining the closing price of similar assets and liabilities from published indices in active markets. Institutional money market funds assets are discounted to the current period using a U.S. Treasury published interest rate as a proxy for a risk-free rate of return. Level 3 fair values occur in situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date and prices are not observable. Cleco has consistently applied the Level 2 and Level 3 fair value techniques from fiscal period to fiscal period. Significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly different fair value measurement. The
assets and liabilities reported at fair value are grouped into classes based on the underlying nature and risks associated with the individual asset or liability.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco and Cleco Power were exposed to concentrations of credit risk through their short-term investments classified as cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents. The following tables present the institutional money market funds in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as recorded on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2020, and 2019:
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 80,712 | | | $ | 103,409 | |
Current restricted cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,545 | | | $ | 11,100 | |
Non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents | $ | 744 | | | $ | 15,134 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 20,812 | | | $ | 49,509 | |
Current restricted cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,545 | | | $ | 11,100 | |
Non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents | $ | 0 | | | $ | 14,294 | |
If the money market funds failed to perform under the terms of the investments, Cleco and Cleco Power would be exposed to a loss of the invested amounts. Collateral on these types of investments is not required by either Cleco or Cleco Power. The Level 2 institutional money market funds asset consists of a single class. In order to capture interest income and minimize risk, cash is invested in money market funds that invest primarily in short-term securities issued by the U. S. Treasury to maintain liquidity and achieve the goal of a net asset value of a dollar. The risks associated with this class are counterparty risk of the fund manager and risk of price volatility associated with the underlying securities of the fund.
Other commodity derivatives include fixed price physical forwards and swap transactions. These other commodity derivatives are recorded at fair value and categorized as Level 2 because pricing is indexed to other contracts.
These contracts contain counterparty credit risk because they are transacted directly with a counterparty and are not cleared on an exchange. Cleco may be required to provide credit support or pay liquidated damages with respect to any open trading contracts that Cleco has entered into or may enter into in the future. The amount of credit support that Cleco may be required to provide at any point in the future is dependent on the amount of the initial contract, changes in the market price, changes in open contracts, and changes in the amounts counterparties owe to Cleco. Changes in any of these factors could cause the amount of requested credit support to increase or decrease.
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun’s FTRs were priced using MISO’s monthly auction prices. Forward seasonal periods are not included in every monthly auction; therefore, the average of
the most recent seasonal auction prices is used for monthly valuation. FTRs are categorized as Level 3 fair value measurements because the only relevant pricing available comes from MISO auctions, which occur monthly in the Multi-Period Monthly Auction.
During the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco did not experience any transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy.
Commodity Contracts
The following tables present the fair values of derivative instruments and their respective line items as recorded on
Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2020, and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | |
| DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS |
(THOUSANDS) | BALANCE SHEET LINE ITEM | AT DEC. 31, 2020 | | AT DEC. 31, 2019 |
Commodity-related contracts | | | |
FTRs | | | | |
Current | Energy risk management assets | $ | 4,805 | | | $ | 6,822 | |
Current | Energy risk management liabilities | (1,625) | | | (1,044) | |
Other commodity derivatives | | | |
Current | Energy risk management assets | 8,276 | | | 201 | |
Non-current | Other deferred charges | 323 | | | 0 | |
Current | Energy risk management liabilities | (828) | | | (3,069) | |
Non-current | Other deferred credits | (784) | | | (2,304) | |
Commodity-related contracts, net | $ | 10,167 | | | $ | 606 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | |
| DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS |
(THOUSANDS) | BALANCE SHEET LINE ITEM | AT DEC. 31, 2020 | | AT DEC. 31, 2019 |
Commodity-related contracts | | | |
FTRs: | | | | |
Current | Energy risk management assets | $ | 4,337 | | | $ | 6,311 | |
Current | Energy risk management liabilities | (1,121) | | | (586) | |
Commodity-related contracts, net | $ | 3,216 | | | $ | 5,725 | |
The following tables present the effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the years December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018:
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | | |
| AMOUNT OF GAIN/(LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES |
| | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | DERIVATIVES LINE ITEM | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Commodity contracts | | | | | | |
FTRs(1) | Electric operations | $ | 9,213 | | | $ | 13,043 | | | $ | 39,659 | |
FTRs(1) | Purchased power | (3,467) | | | (15,685) | | | (4,566) | |
Other commodity derivatives | Fuel used for electric generation | (12,159) | | | (5,172) | | | 0 | |
Total | | $ | (6,413) | | | $ | (7,814) | | | $ | 35,093 | |
(1) For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, unrealized gains (losses) associated with FTRs for Cleco Power of $0.5 million, $(1.7) million and $11.9 million, respectively, were reported through Accumulated deferred fuel on the balance sheet.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | | |
| | AMOUNT OF GAIN/(LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES |
| | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | DERIVATIVES LINE ITEM | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Commodity contracts | | | | | | |
FTRs(1) | Electric operations | $ | 9,213 | | | $ | 13,047 | | | $ | 39,659 | |
FTRs(1) | Purchased power | (6,803) | | | (6,066) | | | (4,566) | |
Total | | $ | 2,410 | | | $ | 6,981 | | | $ | 35,093 | |
(1) For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, unrealized gains (losses) associated with FTRs of $0.5 million, $(0.9) million, and $11.9 million, respectively, were reported through Accumulated deferred fuel on the balance sheet.
The total volume of FTRs that Cleco Power had outstanding at December 31, 2020, and 2019 was 9.5 million MWh and 9.2 million MWh, respectively. The total volume of FTRs that Cleco had outstanding at December 31, 2020, and 2019 was 15.3 million MWh and 14.6 million MWh, respectively. The total volume of other commodity derivatives Cleco had outstanding at December 31, 2020, and 2019 was 73.0 million MMBtus and 58.5 million MMBtus, respectively.
Cleco Power’s total long-term indebtedness as of December 31, 2020, and 2019 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Bonds | | | |
Senior notes, 2.94%, due 2022 | $ | 25,000 | | | $ | 25,000 | |
Senior notes, 3.08%, due 2023 | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | |
Senior notes, 3.17%, due 2024 | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | |
Senior notes, 3.68%, due 2025 | 75,000 | | | 75,000 | |
Senior notes, 3.47%, due 2026 | 130,000 | | | 130,000 | |
Senior notes, 4.33%, due 2027 | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | |
Senior notes, 3.57%, due 2028 | 200,000 | | | 200,000 | |
Senior notes, 6.50%, due 2035 | 295,000 | | | 295,000 | |
Senior notes, 6.00%, due 2040 | 250,000 | | | 250,000 | |
Senior notes, 5.12%, due 2041 | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | |
Series A GO Zone bonds, 2.50%, due 2038, mandatory tender in 2025 | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | |
Series B GO Zone bonds, 4.25%, due 2038 | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Cleco Katrina/Rita’s storm recovery bonds, 5.61%, due 2023 | 0 | | | 11,055 | |
Total bonds | 1,375,000 | | | 1,386,055 | |
Bank term loan, variable rate, due 2022 | 125,000 | | | 0 | |
Finance leases | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Barge lease obligations | 15,244 | | | 15,861 | |
Gross amount of long-term debt and finance leases | 1,515,244 | | | 1,401,916 | |
Less: long-term debt due within one year | 0 | | | 60,970 | |
Less: finance leases classified as long-term debt due within one year | 682 | | | 617 | |
Unamortized debt discount | (5,053) | | | (5,368) | |
Unamortized debt issuance costs | (7,252) | | | (7,589) | |
Total long-term debt and finance leases, net | $ | 1,502,257 | | | $ | 1,327,372 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Cleco’s total long-term indebtedness as of December 31, 2020, and 2019 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Total Cleco Power long-term debt and finance leases, net | $ | 1,502,257 | | | $ | 1,327,372 | |
Cleco Holdings’ long-term debt, net | | | |
Senior notes, 3.250%, due 2023 | 165,000 | | | 165,000 | |
Senior notes, 3.743%, due 2026 | 535,000 | | | 535,000 | |
Senior notes, 3.375%, due 2029 | 300,000 | | | 300,000 | |
Senior notes, 4.973%, due 2046 | 350,000 | | | 350,000 | |
Bank term loan, variable rate, due 2022 | 266,000 | | | 300,000 | |
Bank term loan, variable rate, due 2022 | 0 | | | 30,000 | |
| | | |
Long-term debt due within one year | (66,000) | | | (64,398) | |
Unamortized debt issuance costs(1) | (6,423) | | | (6,271) | |
Fair value adjustment | 119,553 | | | 127,976 | |
Total Cleco long-term debt and finance leases, net | $ | 3,165,387 | | | $ | 3,064,679 | |
(1) For December 31, 2020, and 2019, this amount includes unamortized debt issuance costs for Cleco Holdings of $11.7 million and $11.9 million, respectively, partially offset by deferred debt issuance costs eliminated as a result of the 2016 Merger of $5.3 million and $5.6 million, respectively. For more information, see Note 6 — “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — Cleco Holdings’ 2016 Merger Adjustments.”
The principal amounts payable under long-term debt agreements for each year through 2025 and thereafter are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | CLECO | CLECO POWER |
For the year ending Dec. 31, | | |
2021 | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
2022 | $ | 416,000 | | $ | 150,000 | |
2023 | $ | 265,000 | | $ | 100,000 | |
2024 | $ | 50,000 | | $ | 50,000 | |
2025(1) | $ | 75,000 | | $ | 75,000 | |
Thereafter | $ | 2,310,000 | | $ | 1,125,000 | |
(1) Does not include Series A GO Zone bonds that have a maturity date of December 2038 but a mandatory tender in May 2025.
The principal amounts payable under the finance lease agreement for each year through 2025 and thereafter are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | CLECO | CLECO POWER |
For the year ending Dec. 31, | | |
2021 | $ | 682 | | $ | 682 | |
2022 | $ | 755 | | $ | 755 | |
2023 | $ | 836 | | $ | 836 | |
2024 | $ | 925 | | $ | 925 | |
2025 | $ | 1,023 | | $ | 1,023 | |
Thereafter | $ | 11,023 | | $ | 11,023 | |
For more information on the finance agreement, see Note 4 — “Leases — Finance Lease.”
Cleco Power Debt
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $75.0 million of short-term debt outstanding under its $300.0 million revolving credit facility, at an all-in interest rate of 1.40%. For more information on Cleco Power’s revolving credit facility, see “— Credit Facilities.” There were no amounts outstanding under the
uncommitted line of credit at December 31, 2020. Cleco Power had 0 short-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2019.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power’s long-term debt and finance leases outstanding was $1.50 billion, of which $0.7 million was due within one year. The amount due within one year represents the amount due on the finance lease with Savage Inland Marine. For more information on this finance agreement, see Note 4 — “Leases — Finance Lease.”
On March 2, 2020, Cleco Power completed the repayment of its Cleco Katrina/Rita storm recovery bonds issued in March 2008.
On May 1, 2020, Cleco Power repriced at a mandatory tender date its $50.0 million 2008 Series A GO Zone bonds and entered into a new interest rate period with a mandatory tender date of May 1, 2025. The interest rate for the new interest rate period is fixed at 2.50% per annum.
On August 28, 2020, Cleco Power entered into a $125.0 million variable rate bank term loan due June 28, 2022. Amounts outstanding under the bank term loan bear interest at a base rate plus 0.250% or LIBOR plus 1.25%. At December 31, 2020, the all-in interest rate under the term loan was 1.40%, which was based on LIBOR.
Cleco Debt
At December 31, 2020, Cleco had $75.0 million of short-term debt outstanding under its $475.0 million revolving credit facilities, at an all-in interest rate of 1.40%. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, Cleco has implemented certain measures that it believes will provide financial flexibility and help Cleco maintain liquidity. For additional discussion regarding certain risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors — Operational Risks — COVID-19.” Cleco had 0 short-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2019.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco’s long-term debt and finance leases outstanding was $3.23 billion, of which $66.7 million was due within one year. The long-term debt due within one year at December 31, 2020, primarily represents $66.0 million of principal payments on Cleco Holdings’ debt as required by the Cleco Cajun Transaction commitments to the LPSC.
On September 11, 2019, Cleco Holdings completed the private placement of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.375% senior notes due September 15, 2029. The proceeds from the issuance were used to repay the remaining amounts due under the $300.0 million bridge loan agreement and to repay a portion of the $100.0 million term loan agreement, both entered into in connection with the Cleco Cajun Transaction. On July 14, 2020, Cleco Holdings completed an exchange offer for its outstanding 3.375% senior notes, which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for an equal principal amount of newly issued 3.375% senior notes due September 15, 2029, that were so registered. Cleco Holdings did not receive any proceeds from the exchange offer.
Upon approval of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, commitments were made to the LPSC by Cleco, including repayment of $400.0 million of Cleco Holdings’ debt by December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Holdings was in compliance with these commitments. The cumulative minimum principal amounts committed to be repaid for each year through 2024 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | | |
For the year ending Dec. 31, | | |
2019 | | $ | 66,700 | |
2020 | | $ | 133,300 | |
2021 | | $ | 200,000 | |
2022 | | $ | 267,700 | |
2023 | | $ | 333,300 | |
2024 | | $ | 400,000 | |
|
Credit Facilities
At December 31, 2020, Cleco had 2 separate revolving credit facilities, one for Cleco Holdings in the amount of $175.0 million with 0 outstanding borrowings and one for Cleco Power in the amount of $300.0 million with outstanding borrowings of $75.0 million. The total of all revolving credit facilities creates a maximum aggregate capacity of $475.0 million with outstanding borrowings of $75.0 million.
On May 15, 2020, Cleco Holdings entered into amendments for its revolving credit agreement. These amendments extend the terms of its revolving credit facility through June 2022. Under covenants contained in Cleco Holdings’ revolving credit facility, Cleco is required to maintain total indebtedness less than or equal to 65% of total capitalization. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Holdings was in compliance with the covenants of its revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2020, the borrowing costs under the facility were equal to LIBOR plus 1.875% or ABR plus 0.875%, plus commitment fees of 0.30%. If Cleco Holdings’ credit ratings were to be downgraded one level by the credit rating agencies, Cleco Holdings may be required to pay higher fees and additional interest of 0.50% under the pricing levels of its revolving credit facility.
On May 15, 2020, Cleco Power entered into an amendment for its revolving credit agreement. This amendment extends the term of the revolving credit facility through 2022. Under covenants contained in Cleco Power’s revolving credit facility, Cleco Power is required to maintain total indebtedness less than or equal to 65% of total capitalization. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power was in compliance with the covenants of its credit facility. At December 31, 2020, the borrowing costs under the facility were equal to LIBOR plus 1.25% or ABR plus 0.25%, plus commitment fees of 0.15%. If Cleco Power’s credit ratings were to be downgraded one level by the credit rating agencies, Cleco Power may be required to pay higher fees and additional interest of 0.125% under the pricing levels of its revolving credit facility.
If Cleco Holdings or Cleco Power were to default under the covenants in their respective revolving credit facilities or other debt agreements, they would be unable to borrow additional funds under the facilities, and the lenders could accelerate all principal and interest outstanding. Further, if Cleco Power were to default under its revolving credit facility or other debt agreements, Cleco Holdings would be considered in default under its revolving credit facility.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 10 — Pension Plan and Employee Benefits |
Pension Plan and Other Benefits Plan
Employees hired before August 1, 2007, are covered by a non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan. Benefits under the plan reflect an employee’s years of service, age at retirement, and highest total average compensation for any consecutive five calendar years during the last ten years of employment with Cleco. Cleco’s policy is to base its contributions to the employee pension plan upon actuarial computations utilizing the projected unit credit method, subject to the IRS’s full funding limitation. On December 4, 2020, Cleco made a $15.8 million required contribution to the pension plan. In September 2019, Cleco made a $12.3 million discretionary contribution to the pension plan. Cleco did not make any required or discretionary contributions to the pension plan in 2018. Cleco expects to make $67.0 million in discretionary contributions in 2021, which would reduce the future required contributions. The required contributions are driven by liability funding target percentages set by law which could cause the required contributions to be uneven among the years. Based on funding assumptions at December 31, 2020, management estimates that $53.5 million in pension contributions will be required through 2025. Future discretionary contributions may be made depending on changes in assumptions, the ability to utilize the contribution as a tax deduction, and requirements concerning recognizing a minimum pension liability. Adverse changes in assumptions or adverse actual events could cause additional minimum contributions. The ultimate amount and timing of the contributions may be affected by changes in the discount rate, changes in the funding regulations, and actual returns on fund assets. Cleco Power is the plan sponsor and Support Group is the plan administrator.
The pension plan was amended on February 4, 2019, to include certain former NRG Energy employees who are now Cleco Cajun employees. The Cleco Cajun employees are eligible to participate as a cash balance participant and are credited with all service that was credited to them under the NRG Pension Plan as of February 4, 2019. Benefits under the plan amendment reflect the employee’s years of service, age at retirement, and accrued benefit at retirement. The interest crediting rate on the cash balance plan was 3.15% and 3.65% for years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
Cleco’s retirees may be eligible to receive Other Benefits. Dependents of Cleco’s retirees may also be eligible to receive Other Benefits with the exception of life insurance benefits. Cleco recognizes the expected cost of Other Benefits during the periods in which the benefits are earned.
The employee pension plan and Other Benefits plan obligation, plan assets, and funded status at December 31, 2020, and 2019 are presented in the following table:
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| PENSION BENEFITS | | OTHER BENEFITS |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Change in benefit obligation | | | | | | | |
Benefit obligation at beginning of period | $ | 610,323 | | | $ | 530,936 | | | $ | 52,722 | | | $ | 40,455 | |
Service cost | 9,820 | | | 8,414 | | | 2,153 | | | 1,191 | |
Interest cost | 20,816 | | | 22,485 | | | 1,651 | | | 1,646 | |
Plan participants’ contributions | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1,289 | | | 1,229 | |
Actuarial loss (gain) | 71,708 | | | 73,655 | | | 4,221 | | | 13,897 | |
Expenses paid | (2,661) | | | (2,933) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Benefits paid | (23,622) | | | (22,234) | | | (5,705) | | | (5,696) | |
Benefit obligation at end of period | 686,384 | | | 610,323 | | | 56,331 | | | 52,722 | |
Change in plan assets | | | | | | | |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period | 460,097 | | | 391,933 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Actual return on plan assets | 66,557 | | | 81,081 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Employer contributions | 15,750 | | | 12,250 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Expenses paid | (2,662) | | | (2,933) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | |
Benefits paid | (23,622) | | | (22,234) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Fair value of plan assets at end of period | 516,120 | | | 460,097 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Unfunded status | $ | (170,264) | | | $ | (150,226) | | | $ | (56,331) | | | $ | (52,722) | |
The employee pension plan accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 2020, and 2019 is presented in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| PENSION BENEFITS |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 636,199 | | | $ | 568,354 | |
The pension net actuarial loss was $30.1 million and $19.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. The pension net actuarial loss for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, was primarily due to a decline in the discount rate, partially offset by greater than expected returns on the fair value of plan assets.
The Other Benefits net actuarial loss was $4.2 million and $13.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. The Other Benefits net actuarial loss for the year ended December 31, 2020, was primarily due to a decline in the discount rate. The Other Benefits net actuarial loss for the year ended December 31, 2019, was primarily due to an increase in the rate assumption for medical and dental participation and a decline in the discount rate.
The following table presents the net actuarial gains/losses and prior service costs/credits included in other comprehensive income for Other Benefits and in regulatory assets for pension related to current year gains and losses as a result of being included in net periodic benefit costs for the employee pension plan and Other Benefits plan for December 31, 2020, and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| PENSION BENEFITS | | OTHER BENEFITS |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Net actuarial loss (gain) occurring during period | $ | 30,126 | | | $ | 19,075 | | | $ | 4,221 | | | $ | 13,897 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net actuarial loss amortized during period | $ | 16,292 | | | $ | 7,849 | | | $ | 1,389 | | | $ | 21 | |
| | | | | | | |
Prior service credit amortized during period | $ | (60) | | | $ | (71) | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
The following table presents net actuarial gains/losses and prior service costs/credits in accumulated other comprehensive income for Other Benefits and in regulatory assets for pension that have not been recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs for the employee pension plan and Other Benefits plans at December 31, 2020, and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| PENSION BENEFITS | | OTHER BENEFITS |
| AT DEC. 31, | | AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Net actuarial loss | $ | 165,437 | | | $ | 151,603 | | | $ | 21,342 | | | $ | 15,732 | |
| | | | | | | |
Prior service credit | $ | 0 | | | $ | (60) | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
The non-service components of net periodic pension and Other Benefits cost are included in Other income (expense), net within Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The components of net periodic pension and Other Benefits costs for 2020, 2019, and 2018 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | PENSION BENEFITS | | | | OTHER BENEFITS |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Components of periodic benefit costs | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | $ | 9,820 | | | $ | 8,414 | | | $ | 9,507 | | | $ | 2,153 | | | $ | 1,191 | | | $ | 1,320 | |
Interest cost | 20,816 | | | 22,485 | | | 20,860 | | | 1,651 | | | 1,646 | | | 1,465 | |
Expected return on plan assets | (24,974) | | | (26,502) | | | (23,773) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Amortizations | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Prior service credit | (60) | | | (71) | | | (71) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Net loss (gain) | 16,292 | | | 7,849 | | | 12,312 | | | 1,389 | | | 21 | | | 135 | |
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 21,894 | | | $ | 12,175 | | | $ | 18,835 | | | $ | 5,193 | | | $ | 2,858 | | | $ | 2,920 | |
Because Cleco Power is the pension plan sponsor and the related trust holds the assets, the net unfunded status of the pension plan is reflected at Cleco Power. The liability of Cleco’s other subsidiaries is transferred with a like amount of assets to Cleco Power monthly. The expense of the pension plan related to Cleco’s other subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was $3.5 million, $2.2 million, and $2.0 million, respectively.
Cleco Holdings is the plan sponsor for the other benefit plans. There are 0 assets set aside in a trust and the liabilities are reported on the individual subsidiaries’ financial statements. The expense related to Other Benefits reflected in Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was $4.8 million, $3.1 million, and $3.3 million, respectively. The current and non-current portions of the Other Benefits liability for Cleco and Cleco Power at December 31, 2020, and 2019 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Current | $ | 4,463 | | | $ | 4,401 | |
Non-current | $ | 51,868 | | | $ | 48,321 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Current | $ | 3,865 | | | $ | 3,815 | |
Non-current | $ | 40,734 | | | $ | 42,080 | |
The measurement date used to determine the pension and other postretirement benefits is December 31. The assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation and the periodic costs are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| PENSION BENEFITS | | OTHER BENEFITS |
| AT DEC. 31, | | AT DEC. 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation | | | | | | | |
Discount rate | 2.74 | % | | 3.43 | % | | 2.39 | % | | 3.25 | % |
Rate of compensation increase | 2.75 | % | | 2.81 | % | | N/A | | N/A |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | PENSION BENEFITS | | | | OTHER BENEFITS |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net benefit cost | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discount rate | 3.43 | % | | 4.35 | % | | 3.73 | % | | 3.25 | % | | 4.16 | % | | 3.47 | % |
Expected return on plan assets | 5.91 | % | | 6.55 | % | | 5.86 | % | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A |
Rate of compensation increase | 2.75 | % | | 2.81 | % | | 2.93 | % | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A |
The expected return on plan assets was determined by examining the risk profile of each target category as compared to the expected return on that risk, within the parameters determined by the retirement committee. In assessing the risk as compared to return profile, historical returns as compared to risk were considered. The historical risk compared to returns was adjusted for the expected future long-term relationship between risk and return. The adjustment for the future risk compared to returns was, in part, subjective and not based on any measurable or observable events. For the calculation of the 2021 periodic expense, Cleco decreased the expected long-term return on plan assets to 5.00%. Cleco expects pension expense to increase in 2021 by approximately $2.9 million due to a decrease in the discount rate and a decrease in expected return on plan assets.
Employee pension plan assets are invested in accordance with the Pension Plan’s Investment Policy Statement. At December 31, 2020, allowable investments included U.S. Equity Portfolios, International Equity - Developed Markets Portfolios, Emerging Markets Equity Portfolios, Multi-Asset Credits, Treasury Separate Trading of Registered Interest and Principal of Securities (STRIPS), Fixed Income Portfolios - Long Credit and Intermediate Government Credit, and Real Estate Portfolios.
Real estate funds and the pooled separate accounts are stated at estimated market value based on appraisal reports prepared annually by independent real estate appraisers (members of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers). The estimated market value of recently acquired properties is assumed to approximate cost.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Fair Value Disclosures
Cleco classifies assets and liabilities measured at their fair value according to three different levels, depending on the inputs used in determining fair value.
•Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices in active, liquid markets for the identical asset or liability,
•Level 2 – quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, including inputs that can be corroborated
by observable market data, observable interest rate yield curves and volatilities, and
•Level 3 – unobservable inputs based upon the entities’ own assumptions.
There have been no changes in the methodologies for determining fair value at December 31, 2020, and 2019. The following tables disclose the pension plan’s fair value of financial assets measured on a recurring basis:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | | AT DEC. 31, 2020 | | QUOTED PRICES IN ACTIVE MARKETS FOR IDENTICAL ASSETS (LEVEL 1) | | SIGNIFICANT OTHER OBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 2) | | SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 3) |
Asset Description | | | | | | | | |
Cash equivalents | | $ | 19,567 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 19,567 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Government securities | 26,863 | | | 0 | | | 26,863 | | | 0 | |
Mutual funds | | | | | | | |
Domestic | | 107,055 | | | 107,055 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
International | | 60,104 | | | 60,104 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Real estate funds | | 35,962 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 35,962 | |
Corporate debt | | 192,261 | | | 0 | | | 192,261 | | | 0 | |
Total | | $ | 441,812 | | | $ | 167,159 | | | $ | 238,691 | | | $ | 35,962 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Investments measured at net asset value* | 72,044 | | | | | | | |
| Interest accrual | 2,264 | | | | | | | |
| Total net assets | $ | 516,120 | | | | | | | |
| *Investments measured at net asset value consist of Common/collective trust. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | | AT DEC. 31, 2019 | | QUOTED PRICES IN ACTIVE MARKETS FOR IDENTICAL ASSETS (LEVEL 1) | | SIGNIFICANT OTHER OBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 2) | | SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 3) |
Asset Description | | | | | | | | |
Cash equivalents | | $ | 4,810 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 4,810 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Government securities | 19,517 | | | 0 | | | 19,517 | | | 0 | |
Mutual funds | | | | | | | |
Domestic | | 102,184 | | | 102,184 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
International | | 53,041 | | | 53,041 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Real estate funds | | 18,017 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 18,017 | |
Corporate debt | | 157,109 | | | 0 | | | 157,109 | | | 0 | |
Total | | $ | 354,678 | | | $ | 155,225 | | | $ | 181,436 | | | $ | 18,017 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Investments measured at net asset value* | 103,326 | | | | | | | |
| Interest accrual | 2,093 | | | | | | | |
| Total net assets | $ | 460,097 | | | | | | | |
| *Investments measured at net asset value consist of Common/collective trust. |
Level 3 valuations are derived from other valuation methodologies including pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques. Level 3 valuations incorporate subjective judgments and consider assumptions including capitalization rates, discount rates, cash flows, and other factors that are not observable in the market. Significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly different fair value measurement.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the pension plan’s real estate funds measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019:
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | |
Balance, Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | 20,298 | |
Realized losses | 370 | |
Unrealized gains | (1,727) | |
Purchases | 759 | |
Sales | (1,683) | |
Balance, Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 18,017 | |
Realized gains | 251 | |
Unrealized losses | (1,603) | |
Purchases | 20,893 | |
Sales | (1,596) | |
Balance, Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 35,962 | |
The market-related value of plan assets differs from the fair value of plan assets by the amount of deferred asset gains or losses. Actual asset returns that differ from the expected return on plan assets are deferred and recognized in the market-related value of assets on a straight-line basis over a five-year period. For 2020, the return on plan assets was 15.89% compared to an expected long-term return of 5.91%. The 2019 return on pension plan assets was 22.17% compared to an expected long-term return of 6.55%. As of December 31, 2020, none of the pension plan participants’ future annual benefits are covered by insurance contracts.
Pension Plan Investment Objectives
Cleco’s retirement committee has established investment performance objectives of the pension plan assets. Over a three- to five-year period, the objectives are for the pension plan’s annualized total return to:
•Exceed the (FAS) actuarial assumed rate of return on plan assets, and
•Exceed the annualized total return of the following customized index (based on the target allocation in the glide path) consisting of a mixture of S&P 500 Index, Russell 2500 Index, Morgan Stanley Capital International All Country World ex U.S. Index, Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets Index, Customer Index related to Multi-Asset Credit asset class, Bloomberg Barclays Capital Long Credit Index, Bloomberg Barclays 15+ Year Treasury STRIPS, Bloomberg Barclays Intermediate/Government Credit Index, and National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries Index.
Risk characteristics of the portfolio (annualized standard deviation of returns) should be similar to or less than the custom index.
In order to meet the objectives and to control risk, the retirement committee has established the following guidelines that the investment managers must follow:
U.S. Equity Portfolios
•Equity holdings in any single company (including common stock and convertible securities) must not exceed 10% of the manager’s portfolio measured at market value.
•A minimum of 25 stocks should be owned in the portfolio.
•Equity holdings in any one economic sector (as defined by the Global Industry Classification Standard) should not exceed the lesser of three times the sector’s weighting in the S&P 500 Index or 35% of the portfolio.
•Marketable common stocks, preferred stocks convertible into common stocks, and fixed income securities convertible
into common stocks are the only permissible equity investments.
•Securities in foreign (non-U.S.) entities denominated in U.S. dollars are limited to 10% of the manager’s portfolio measured at market value. Securities denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are not permissible investments.
•The purchase of securities on margin and short sales is prohibited.
International Equity - Developed Markets Portfolios
•Equity holdings in a single company (including common stock and convertible securities) should not exceed 5% of the manager’s portfolio measured at market value.
•A minimum of 30 individual stocks should be owned in the portfolio.
•Equity holdings in any industry sector (as defined by the Global Industry Classification Standard) should not exceed 35% of the portfolio measured at market value.
•A minimum of 50% of the countries within the Morgan Stanley Capital International All Country World ex U.S. Index should be represented within the portfolio. The allocation to an individual country should not exceed the lesser of 30% or 5 times the country’s weighting within the Morgan Stanley Capital International All Country World ex U.S. Index.
•Currency hedging decisions are at the discretion of the investment manager.
Emerging Markets Portfolios
•Equity holdings in any single company (including common stock and convertible securities) should not exceed 10% of the manager’s portfolio measured at market value.
•A minimum of 30 individual stocks should be held within the portfolio.
•Equity holdings in any one industry (as defined by Global Industry Classification Standard) should not exceed 25% of the manager’s portfolio at market value.
•Equity investments must represent at least 75% of the portfolio under normal circumstances.
•A minimum of three countries should be represented within the portfolio.
•Illiquid securities which are not readily marketable may represent no more than 10% of portfolio assets.
•Currency hedging decisions are at the discretion of the investment manager.
Multi-Asset Credits
•Assets can include, but would not be limited to, high yield debt, emerging market debt, global investment grade credit and bank loans, as well as fixed income strategies.
•Currency hedging decisions are the discretion of the investment manager.
Treasury STRIPS
•The STRIPS are synthetic zero-coupon bonds that are created by separating each coupon and principal payment of a treasury bond into a separate security. STRIPS take the form of a zero-coupon bond which is sold at a discount to face value and mature at par. They are backed by U.S. Treasury securities.
•Implementation of the portfolio is either through Treasury Futures or purchase of Treasury STRIPS through an investment manager.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
•The benchmark would be Bloomberg Barclays 15+ Year Treasury STRIPS.
Fixed Income Portfolios - Long Credit and Intermediate Government Credit
•Permitted securities include all U.S. dollar denominated investment grade corporate debt, including sovereign, super-nationals, and Yankee bonds, U.S. government obligations and agency debt, all U.S. dollar denominated investment grade mortgage-backed securities, all U.S. dollar investment grade private placements or securities issued as 144A with or without registration rights.
•The portfolio can invest in surplus notes, trust preferred, E-Caps, and Hybrids. These types of securities do have risk of coupon default.
•The portfolio can invest in both senior and subordinated debt and money market securities: Treasury Bills, Commercial or Asset-backed paper rated A1/P1 or higher.
•The duration of the portfolio must be within +/- 1 year of benchmark.
•Sub-asset classes included but not limited to: cash, government, government related securities investment, grade credit, mortgage-backed securities asset-backed, securities, private placements, commercial mortgage-backed securities taxable municipal bonds
•High yield up to 5% from downgrades with no securities to be held below B- (rated by major rating agencies). Not allowed to purchase high yield securities. (120 day cure period for downgrades below B- - -)
•Securities must have a maximum position size of 5% for A rated securities and 3% for BBB rated securities.
•Treasury STRIPS managers will have the discretion to utilize U.S. treasury futures and STRIPS as needed to adjust the portfolio duration.
Real Estate Portfolios
•Real estate funds should be invested primarily in direct equity positions, with debt and other investments representing less than 25% of the fund.
•Leverage should be no more than 70% of the market value of the fund.
•Investments should be focused on existing income-producing properties, with land and development properties representing less than 40% of the fund.
The use of futures and options positions which leverage portfolio positions through borrowing, short sales, or other encumbrances of the Plan’s assets is prohibited. The Long Duration fixed income managers, Intermediate Government Credit and Treasury STRIPS manger(s) are exempt from the prohibition on derivatives use, due to the nature of long duration fixed income management.
The investment manager shall not purchase any securities of its organization or affiliated entities.
The following chart shows the dynamic asset allocation based on the funded ratio at December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| PERCENT OF TOTAL PLAN ASSETS |
| | | AT DEC. 31, 2020 |
| MINIMUM | | TARGET | | MAXIMUM |
Return-seeking | | | | | |
Domestic equity | | | 19 | % | | |
International equity | | | 20 | % | | |
Multi-asset credit | | | 6 | % | | |
Real estate | | | 5 | % | | |
Total return-seeking | 45 | % | | 50 | % | | 55 | % |
Liability hedging* | 45 | % | | 50 | % | | 55 | % |
*Liability hedging has no target subcategories. |
The assumed health care cost trend rates used to measure the expected cost of Other Benefits is 5.0% for 2021 and remains at 5.0% thereafter. The rate used for 2020 was also 5.0%. Assumed health care cost trend rates have a limited effect on the amount reported for Cleco’s health care plans.
The projected benefit payments for the employee pension plan and Other Benefits obligation plan for each year through 2025 and the next five years thereafter are listed in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | PENSION BENEFITS | | OTHER BENEFITS, GROSS |
For the year ending Dec. 31, | | | |
2021 | $ | 25,568 | | | $ | 4,516 | |
2022 | $ | 26,904 | | | $ | 4,551 | |
2023 | $ | 28,064 | | | $ | 4,515 | |
2024 | $ | 29,140 | | | $ | 4,533 | |
2025 | $ | 30,336 | | | $ | 4,497 | |
Next five years | $ | 164,801 | | | $ | 21,676 | |
SERP
Certain Cleco officers are covered by SERP. In 2014, SERP was closed to new participants; however, with regard to current SERP participants, including former employees or their beneficiaries, all terms of SERP will continue, other than as described below. SERP is a non-qualified, non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan. Generally, benefits under the plan reflect an employee’s years of service, age at retirement, and the sum of (a) the highest base salary paid out over the last five calendar years and (b) the average of the 5 highest cash bonuses paid during the 60 months prior to retirement. SERP benefits are reduced by retirement benefits received from any other defined benefit pension plan, supplemental executive retirement plan, or Cleco contributions under the enhanced 401(k) Plan to the extent such contributions exceed the amount the employee would have received under the terms of the original 401(k) Plan. NaN executive officers’ SERP benefits were capped as of December 31, 2017, with regard to final compensation; however, adjustments will continue with regard to age and tenure with Cleco. Additionally, these executive officers had their annual bonuses set at target rather than actual awards for 2017 for the average incentive award portion of their SERP benefit calculation. A third executive officer’s SERP benefit amount will be set at a specified amount based upon the year of separation. Management reviews current market trends as it evaluates Cleco’s future compensation strategy.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Cleco does not fund the SERP liability, but instead pays for current benefits out of the general funds available. Cleco Power has formed a rabbi trust. The life insurance policies issued on SERP participants designate the rabbi trust as the beneficiary. Market conditions could have a significant impact on the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies. Proceeds from the life insurance policies are expected to be used to pay the SERP participants’ death benefits, as well as future SERP payments. However, because SERP is a non-qualified plan, the assets of the trust could be used to satisfy general creditors of Cleco Power in the event of insolvency. All SERP benefits are paid out of the general cash available of the respective companies that employed the officer. Cleco Power is the plan sponsor and Support Group is the plan administrator.
SERP’s funded status at December 31, 2020, and 2019 is presented in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | SERP BENEFITS |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Change in benefit obligation | | | |
Benefit obligation at beginning of period | $ | 89,128 | | | $ | 78,414 | |
Service cost | 399 | | | 330 | |
Interest cost | 2,932 | | | 3,326 | |
Actuarial loss (gain) | 9,621 | | | 11,608 | |
Benefits paid | (4,590) | | | (4,550) | |
Plan amendments | (265) | | | 0 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Benefit obligation at end of period | $ | 97,225 | | | $ | 89,128 | |
SERP’s accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 2020, and 2019 is presented in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| SERP BENEFITS |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 97,225 | | | $ | 89,128 | |
The following table presents net actuarial gains/losses and prior service costs/credits included in other comprehensive income or regulatory assets related to current year gains and losses as a result of being amortized as a component of net periodic benefit costs for SERP for December 31, 2020, and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | SERP BENEFITS |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Net actuarial loss (gain) occurring during year | $ | 9,621 | | | $ | 11,608 | |
Net actuarial loss amortized during year | $ | 3,185 | | | $ | 1,544 | |
Prior service credit amortized during year | $ | (215) | | | $ | (160) | |
The following table presents net actuarial losses and prior service credit in accumulated other comprehensive income and regulatory assets that have not been recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs for SERP at December 31, 2020, and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| SERP BENEFITS |
| AT DEC. 31 |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Net actuarial loss | $ | 34,825 | | | $ | 28,731 | |
Prior service credit | $ | (1,728) | | | $ | (1,678) | |
The non-service components of net periodic benefit cost related to SERP are included in Other income (expense), net within Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The components of the net SERP costs for 2020, 2019, and 2018 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | SERP BENEFITS |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Components of periodic benefit costs | | | | | |
Service cost | $ | 399 | | | $ | 330 | | | $ | 542 | |
Interest cost | 2,932 | | | 3,326 | | | 3,077 | |
Amortizations | | | | | |
Prior service credit | (215) | | | (160) | | | (160) | |
Net loss | 3,186 | | | 1,544 | | | 2,913 | |
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 6,302 | | | $ | 5,040 | | | $ | 6,372 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The measurement date used to determine the SERP benefits is December 31. The assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation and the periodic costs are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| SERP BENEFITS |
| AT DEC. 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation | | | |
Discount rate | 2.64 | % | | 3.37 | % |
Rate of compensation increase | N/A | | 5.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | SERP BENEFITS |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net benefit cost | | | | | |
Discount rate | 3.37 | % | | 4.34 | % | | 3.70 | % |
Rate of compensation increase | N/A | | 5.00 | % | | 5.00 | % |
The expense related to SERP reflected on Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was $1.0 million, $0.8 million, and $1.4 million, respectively.
Liabilities relating to SERP are reported on the individual subsidiaries’ financial statements. The current and non-current portions of the SERP liability for Cleco and Cleco Power at December 31, 2020, and 2019 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Current | $ | 4,703 | | | $ | 4,599 | |
Non-current | $ | 92,522 | | | $ | 84,529 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Current | $ | 711 | | | $ | 760 | |
Non-current | $ | 19,828 | | | $ | 13,964 | |
The projected benefit payments for SERP for each year through 2025 and the next five years thereafter are shown in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | 2025 | | NEXT FIVE YEARS |
SERP | $ | 4,764 | | | $ | 4,756 | | | $ | 4,809 | | | $ | 4,867 | | | $ | 5,000 | | | $ | 25,178 | |
401(k)
Cleco’s 401(k) Plan is intended to provide active, eligible employees with voluntary, long-term savings and investment opportunities. The 401(k) Plan is a defined contribution plan and is subject to the applicable provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. In accordance with
the 401(k) Plan, employer contributions are made in the form of cash. Cash contributions are invested in proportion to the participant’s voluntary contribution investment choices. Participation in the Plan is voluntary and active Cleco employees are eligible to participate. Cleco’s 401(k) was amended upon the close of the Cleco Cajun Transaction to include Cleco Cajun employees. Effective October 1, 2020, Cleco’s 401(k) Plan was restated to implement the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Act of 2019, and the CARES Act to permit COVID-19 distributions along with other provisions. Cleco’s 401(k) Plan expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
401(k) Plan expense | $ | 9,685 | | | $ | 7,861 | | | $ | 5,884 | |
Cleco Power is the plan sponsor for the 401(k) Plan. The expense of the 401(k) Plan related to Cleco’s other subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
401(k) Plan expense | $ | 4,424 | | | $ | 3,408 | | | $ | 1,066 | |
Cleco
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, income tax expense was higher than the amount computed by applying the statutory federal rate. The differences are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Income before tax | $ | 158,018 | | | $ | 195,830 | | | $ | 123,819 | |
Statutory rate | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % |
Tax expense at federal statutory rate | $ | 33,184 | | | $ | 41,124 | | | $ | 26,002 | |
Increase (decrease) | | | | | |
Plant differences, including AFUDC flowthrough | 5,100 | | | (4,687) | | | (401) | |
| | | | | |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | 7,190 | | | 9,565 | | | 6,288 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Return to accrual adjustment | 7,218 | | | (3,963) | | | (193) | |
| | | | | |
NMTC | 0 | | | 0 | | | (1,578) | |
Amortization of excess ADIT | (16,667) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Other, net | (307) | | | 1,126 | | | (736) | |
Total tax expense | $ | 35,718 | | | $ | 43,165 | | | $ | 29,382 | |
Effective rate | 22.6 | % | | 22.0 | % | | 23.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Information about current and deferred income tax expense is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Current federal income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (2,634) | | | $ | 1,600 | | | $ | 15,304 | |
Deferred federal income tax expense | 21,865 | | | 37,963 | | | 5,863 | |
Amortization of accumulated deferred investment tax credits | (159) | | | (191) | | | (236) | |
Total federal income tax expense | $ | 19,072 | | | $ | 39,372 | | | $ | 20,931 | |
Current state income tax expense | 2,636 | | | 1,675 | | | 7,771 | |
Deferred state income tax expense | 14,010 | | | 2,118 | | | 680 | |
Total state income tax expense | $ | 16,646 | | | $ | 3,793 | | | $ | 8,451 | |
Total federal and state income tax expense | $ | 35,718 | | | $ | 43,165 | | | $ | 29,382 | |
Items charged or credited directly to member’s equity | | | | | |
Federal deferred | (2,202) | | | (5,130) | | | 1,408 | |
State deferred | (720) | | | (1,678) | | | 460 | |
Total tax expense (benefit) from items charged directly to member’s equity | $ | (2,922) | | | $ | (6,808) | | | $ | 1,868 | |
Total federal and state income tax expense | $ | 32,796 | | | $ | 36,357 | | | $ | 31,250 | |
The balance of accumulated deferred federal and state income tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2020, and 2019 was comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Depreciation and property basis differences | $ | (865,807) | | | $ | (862,263) | |
Net operating loss carryforward | 109,819 | | | 120,955 | |
NMTC | 92,364 | | | 92,364 | |
Fuel costs | (8,906) | | | (3,984) | |
| | | |
| | | |
Other comprehensive income | 13,016 | | | 10,612 | |
Regulated operations regulatory liability, net | 47,060 | | | 34,836 | |
Postretirement benefits | 25,775 | | | 22,691 | |
Merger fair value adjustments | (51,073) | | | (52,957) | |
Other | (23,624) | | | (19,312) | |
Accumulated deferred federal and state income taxes, net | $ | (661,376) | | | $ | (657,058) | |
Cleco Power
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, income tax expense was higher than the amount computed by applying the statutory rate. The differences are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Income before tax | $ | 123,454 | | | $ | 193,714 | | | $ | 218,181 | |
Statutory rate | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % |
Tax expense at federal statutory rate | $ | 25,925 | | | $ | 40,680 | | | $ | 45,818 | |
Increase (decrease) | | | | | |
Plant differences, including AFUDC flowthrough | 5,100 | | | (4,687) | | | (401) | |
| | | | | |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | 6,303 | | | 11,683 | | | 11,080 | |
| | | | | |
Return to accrual adjustment | 7,082 | | | (2,008) | | | 483 | |
| | | | | |
Amortization of excess ADIT | (16,667) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Other, net | (944) | | | (216) | | | (1,056) | |
Total taxes | $ | 26,799 | | | $ | 45,452 | | | $ | 55,924 | |
Effective rate | 21.7 | % | | 23.5 | % | | 25.6 | % |
Information about current and deferred income tax expense is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Current federal income tax expense | $ | 15,724 | | | $ | 14,781 | | | $ | 44,411 | |
Deferred federal income tax (benefit) expense | (5,033) | | | 22,443 | | | (9,033) | |
Amortization of accumulated deferred investment tax credits | (159) | | | (191) | | | (236) | |
Total federal income tax expense | $ | 10,532 | | | $ | 37,033 | | | $ | 35,142 | |
Current state income tax expense | 5,069 | | | 9,063 | | | 23,293 | |
Deferred state income tax benefit | 11,198 | | | (644) | | | (2,511) | |
Total state income tax expense | $ | 16,267 | | | $ | 8,419 | | | $ | 20,782 | |
Total federal and state income taxes | $ | 26,799 | | | $ | 45,452 | | | $ | 55,924 | |
Items charged or credited directly to members’ equity | | | | | |
Federal deferred | (576) | | | (2,500) | | | 797 | |
State deferred | (189) | | | (818) | | | 261 | |
Total tax expense (benefit) from items charged directly to member’s equity | $ | (765) | | | $ | (3,318) | | | $ | 1,058 | |
Total federal and state income tax expense | $ | 26,034 | | | $ | 42,134 | | | $ | 56,982 | |
The balance of accumulated deferred federal and state income tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2020, and 2019 was comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Depreciation and property basis differences | $ | (725,034) | | | $ | (705,423) | |
Net operating loss carryforward | 35,442 | | | 2,714 | |
Fuel costs | (7,072) | | | (5,608) | |
| | | |
| | | |
Other comprehensive income | 8,274 | | | 7,510 | |
Regulated operations regulatory liability, net | 47,060 | | | 34,836 | |
Postretirement benefits | 11,951 | | | 10,044 | |
Other | (5,219) | | | (1,907) | |
Accumulated deferred federal and state income taxes, net | $ | (634,598) | | | $ | (657,834) | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Valuation Allowance
Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco had a deferred tax asset resulting from a NMTC carryforward of $92.4 million. If the NMTC carryforward is not utilized, it will begin to expire in 2030. Management considers it more likely than not that the deferred tax asset related to the NMTC carryforward will be realized; therefore, 0 valuation allowance has been recorded for Cleco and Cleco Power.
Net Operating Losses
For the 2019 tax year, Cleco created a federal net operating loss of approximately $433.2 million. For the 2020 tax year, Cleco expects to create an additional federal net operating loss of $65.0 million and a state net operating loss of $134.6 million.
For the 2020 tax year, Cleco Power expects to create a federal net operating loss of $136.3 million and a state operating loss of $134.6 million.
The federal net operating loss may be carried forward indefinitely, and state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2040.
Cleco considers it more likely than not that these income tax losses will be utilized to reduce future income tax payments and utilize the entire net operating loss carryforward within the statutory deadlines.
Uncertain Tax Positions
Cleco classifies all interest related to uncertain tax positions as a component of interest payable and interest expense. At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco and Cleco Power had 0 interest payable related to uncertain tax positions. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, Cleco and Cleco Power had 0 interest expense related to uncertain tax positions.
At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco and Cleco Power had 0 liability for unrecognized tax positions. Cleco estimates that it is reasonably possible that the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2020, for Cleco and Cleco Power would be unchanged in the next 12 months. The settlement of open tax years could involve the payment of additional taxes, and/or the recognition of tax benefits, which may affect Cleco’s effective income tax rate.
Income Tax Audits
Cleco participates in the IRS’s Compliance Assurance Process in which financial results are examined and agreed upon prior to filing federal consolidated tax returns. While the statute of limitations remains open for tax years 2017, 2018, and 2019, management believes the likelihood of further examination by the IRS is remote.
The state income tax years 2017, 2018, and 2019 remain subject to examination by the Louisiana Department of Revenue.
Cleco classifies income tax penalties as a component of other expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, 0 penalties were recognized.
TCJA
On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was enacted into law. The TCJA includes significant changes to the IRC, as amended, including amendments which significantly change the taxation of business entities and includes specific provisions related to
rate regulated activities, including Cleco Power. The most significant change that impacts Cleco is the reduction of the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%.
At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco and Cleco Power had $352.4 million and $375.0 million, accrued for the excess ADIT, respectively. For more information on the regulatory treatment of the TCJA regulatory liability, see Note 6 — “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — Income Taxes” and Note 13 — “Regulation and Rates — TCJA.”
Additionally, as a result of the TCJA, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, corporations are no longer subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT). For companies with unused AMT credits, the credits may be carried forward and used as refundable credits for tax years beginning after 2017, but before 2022. At December 31, 2019, Cleco had $1.4 million in non-current AMT credits recorded in Other deferred charges on Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The CARES Act passed in 2020 allowed businesses to claim the refund in the current year. Cleco used the remaining unused AMT credits in 2020.
CARES Act
On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted and signed into law in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Among other provisions, the CARES Act includes modifications on the limitations of business interest for the 2020 and 2019 tax years. The modifications increase the allowable business interest deduction from 30% to 50% of adjusted taxable income. Cleco did not have any disallowed interest for the 2019 tax year and does not anticipate having any disallowed interest for the 2020 tax year.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 12 — Disclosures about Segments |
Cleco
Cleco’s reportable segments are based on its method of internal reporting, which disaggregates business units by its first-tier subsidiary. Cleco’s reportable segments are Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun.
Each reportable segment engages in business activities from which it earns revenue and incurs expenses. Segment managers report periodically to Cleco’s CEO, who is Cleco’s chief operating decision maker, with discrete financial information and, at least quarterly, present discrete financial information to Cleco’s Board of Managers. The reportable segment prepares budgets that are presented to and approved by Cleco’s Board of Managers. The column shown as Other in the following tables includes the holding company, a shared services subsidiary, and an investment subsidiary. Upon the completion of the Cleco Cajun Transaction on February 4, 2019, Cleco Cajun became a reportable segment. For more information on the Cleco Cajun Transaction, see Note 3 — “Business Combinations.” There are no other changes to Cleco’s existing reportable segments.
The financial results in the following tables are presented on an accrual basis. EBITDA is a key non-GAAP financial measure used by the CEO to assess the operating performance of Cleco’s segments. Management evaluates the performance of Cleco’s segments and allocates resources to them based on segment profit and the requirements to implement strategic initiatives and projects to meet current business objectives. EBITDA is defined as net income adjusted for interest, income taxes, depreciation, and
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
amortization. Depreciation and amortization in the following tables includes amortization of intangible assets and liabilities recorded for the fair value adjustment of wholesale power supply agreements as a result of the 2016 Merger and the Cleco Cajun Transaction, as well as amortization of deferred lease revenue resulting from the Cleco Cajun Transaction.
Material intercompany transactions occur on a regular basis. These intercompany transactions relate primarily to joint and common administrative support services as well as transmission services provided by Cleco Power to Cleco Cajun.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEGMENT INFORMATION | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2020 |
(THOUSANDS) | CLECO POWER | | CLECO CAJUN | | | | | | TOTAL SEGMENTS |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | |
Electric operations | $ | 1,015,018 | | | $ | 365,555 | | | | | | | $ | 1,380,573 | |
Other operations | 65,237 | | | 121,747 | | | | | | | 186,984 | |
Affiliate revenue | 5,156 | | | 204 | | | | | | | 5,360 | |
Electric customer credits | (53,119) | | | (153) | | | | | | | (53,272) | |
Operating revenue, net | $ | 1,032,292 | | | $ | 487,353 | | | | | | | $ | 1,519,645 | |
Net income | $ | 96,655 | | | $ | 89,492 | | | | | | | $ | 186,147 | |
Add: Depreciation and amortization | 166,987 | | | 47,183 | | | | | | (1) | 214,170 | |
Less: Interest income | 3,362 | | | 273 | | | | | | | 3,635 | |
Add: Interest charges | 73,985 | | | (750) | | | | | | | 73,235 | |
Add: Federal and state income tax expense | 26,799 | | | 29,080 | | | | | | | 55,879 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | $ | 361,064 | | | $ | 164,732 | | | | | | | $ | 525,796 | |
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | $ | 378,042 | | | $ | 8,920 | | | | | | | $ | 386,962 | |
Equity investment in investee | $ | 9,072 | | | $ | 0 | | | | | | | $ | 9,072 | |
Goodwill | $ | 1,490,797 | | | $ | 0 | | | | | | | $ | 1,490,797 | |
Total segment assets | $ | 6,256,944 | | | $ | 1,029,812 | | | | | | | $ | 7,286,756 | |
(1) Includes $12.4 million of amortization of intangible assets and liabilities related to wholesale power supply agreements and $(9.2) million of deferred lease revenue amortization as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2020 |
(THOUSANDS) | | | | | TOTAL SEGMENTS | | OTHER | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric operations | | | | | $ | 1,380,573 | | | $ | (9,680) | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,370,893 | |
Other operations | | | | | 186,984 | | | 3 | | | (6,463) | | | 180,524 | |
Affiliate revenue | | | | | 5,360 | | | 129,126 | | | (134,486) | | | 0 | |
Electric customer credits | | | | | (53,272) | | | 0 | | | 1 | | | (53,271) | |
Operating revenue, net | | | | | $ | 1,519,645 | | | $ | 119,449 | | | $ | (140,948) | | | $ | 1,498,146 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | | $ | 214,170 | | | $ | 18,059 | | (1) | $ | 0 | | | $ | 232,229 | |
Interest income | | | | | $ | 3,635 | | | $ | 412 | | | $ | (99) | | | $ | 3,948 | |
Interest charges | | | | | $ | 73,235 | | | $ | 64,728 | | | $ | (99) | | | $ | 137,864 | |
Federal and state income tax expense | | | | | $ | 55,879 | | | $ | (20,160) | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 35,718 | |
Net income | | | | | $ | 186,147 | | | $ | (63,848) | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 122,300 | |
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | | | | | $ | 386,962 | | | $ | 3,051 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 390,013 | |
Equity investment in investee | | | | | $ | 9,072 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 9,072 | |
Goodwill | | | | | $ | 1,490,797 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,490,797 | |
Total segment assets | | | | | $ | 7,286,756 | | | $ | 595,217 | | | $ | (156,404) | | | $ | 7,725,569 | |
(1) Includes $9.7 million of amortization of intangible assets related to Cleco Power’s wholesale power supply agreements as a result of the 2016 Merger. |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2019 |
(THOUSANDS) | CLECO POWER | | CLECO CAJUN | | | | | | | | TOTAL SEGMENTS |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric operations | $ | 1,130,928 | | | $ | 375,489 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,506,417 | |
Other operations | 72,833 | | | 117,468 | | | | | | | | | 190,301 | |
Affiliate revenue | 3,125 | | | 108 | | | | | | | | | 3,233 | |
Electric customer credits | (38,516) | | | (1,447) | | | | | | | | | (39,963) | |
Operating revenue, net | $ | 1,168,370 | | | $ | 491,618 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,659,988 | |
Net income | $ | 148,262 | | | $ | 69,411 | | | | | | | | | $ | 217,673 | |
Add: Depreciation and amortization | 172,471 | | | 38,465 | | | | | | | | (1) | 210,936 | |
Less: Interest income | 4,744 | | | 987 | | | | | | | | | 5,731 | |
Add: Interest charges | 71,279 | | | 35 | | | | | | | | | 71,314 | |
Add: Federal and state income tax expense | 45,452 | | | 22,479 | | | | | | | | | 67,931 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | $ | 432,720 | | | $ | 129,403 | | | | | | | | | $ | 562,123 | |
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | $ | 313,962 | | | $ | 9,174 | | | | | | | | | $ | 323,136 | |
Equity investment in investee | $ | 17,072 | | | $ | 0 | | | | | | | | | $ | 17,072 | |
Goodwill | $ | 1,490,797 | | | $ | 0 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,490,797 | |
Total segment assets | $ | 5,967,327 | | | $ | 1,011,591 | | | | | | | | | $ | 6,978,918 | |
(1) Includes $11.4 million of amortization of intangible assets and liabilities related to wholesale power supply agreements and $(8.4) million of deferred lease revenue amortization as a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2019 |
(THOUSANDS) | | | | TOTAL SEGMENTS | | OTHER | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL SEGMENTS |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric operations | | | | $ | 1,506,417 | | | $ | (9,680) | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 1,496,736 | |
Other operations | | | | 190,301 | | | 2 | | | (7,471) | | | 182,832 | |
Affiliate revenue | | | | 3,233 | | | 109,067 | | | (112,300) | | | 0 | |
Electric customer credits | | | | (39,963) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (39,963) | |
Operating revenue, net | | | | $ | 1,659,988 | | | $ | 99,389 | | | $ | (119,772) | | | $ | 1,639,605 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | $ | 210,936 | | | $ | 17,985 | | (1) | $ | 0 | | | $ | 228,921 | |
Interest income | | | | $ | 5,731 | | | $ | 974 | | | $ | (615) | | | $ | 6,090 | |
Interest charges | | | | $ | 71,314 | | | $ | 70,611 | | | $ | (616) | | | $ | 141,309 | |
Federal and state income tax expense | | | | $ | 67,931 | | | $ | (24,766) | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 43,165 | |
Net income (loss) | | | | $ | 217,673 | | | $ | (65,009) | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 152,665 | |
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | | | | $ | 323,136 | | | $ | 655 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 323,791 | |
Equity investment in investee | | | | $ | 17,072 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 17,072 | |
Goodwill | | | | $ | 1,490,797 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,490,797 | |
Total segment assets | | | | $ | 6,978,918 | | | $ | 546,096 | | | $ | (48,716) | | | $ | 7,476,298 | |
(1) Includes $9.7 million of amortization of intangible assets related to Cleco Power’s wholesale power supply agreements as a result of the 2016 Merger. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2018 |
(THOUSANDS) | | CLECO POWER | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric operations | | $ | 1,191,587 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other operations | | 82,330 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliate revenue | | 874 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric customer credits | | (33,195) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating revenue, net | | $ | 1,241,596 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 162,257 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Add: Depreciation and amortization | | 162,069 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Interest income | | 5,052 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Add: Interest charges | | 71,303 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Add: Federal and state income tax expense | | 55,924 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 446,501 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | | $ | 289,153 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity investment in investee | | $ | 18,172 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | $ | 1,490,797 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total segment assets | | $ | 5,839,853 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2018 |
(THOUSANDS) | | | | | CLECO POWER | | OTHER | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric operations | | | | | $ | 1,191,587 | | | $ | (9,680) | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,181,907 | |
Other operations | | | | | 82,330 | | | 2 | | | 0 | | | 82,332 | |
Affiliate revenue | | | | | 874 | | | 74,591 | | | (75,465) | | | 0 | |
Electric customer credits | | | | | (33,195) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (33,195) | |
Operating revenue, net | | | | | $ | 1,241,596 | | | $ | 64,913 | | | $ | (75,465) | | | $ | 1,231,044 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | | $ | 162,069 | | | $ | 18,024 | | (1) | $ | 1 | | | $ | 180,094 | |
Interest income | | | | | $ | 5,052 | | | $ | 1,338 | | | $ | (317) | | | $ | 6,073 | |
Interest charges | | | | | $ | 71,303 | | | $ | 55,659 | | | $ | (320) | | | $ | 126,642 | |
Federal and state income tax expense | | | | | $ | 55,924 | | | $ | (26,541) | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 29,382 | |
Net income (loss) | | | | | $ | 162,257 | | | $ | (67,819) | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 94,437 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | | | | | $ | 289,153 | | | $ | 1,908 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 291,061 | |
Equity investment in investee | | | | | $ | 18,172 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 18,172 | |
Goodwill | | | | | $ | 1,490,797 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,490,797 | |
Total segment assets | | | | | $ | 5,839,853 | | | $ | 633,756 | | | $ | (36,795) | | | $ | 6,436,814 | |
(1) Includes $9.7 million of amortization of intangible assets related to Cleco Power’s wholesale power supply agreements as a result of the 2016 Merger. | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | | | | | 2018 |
Net income | $ | 122,300 | | | $ | 152,665 | | | | | | | $ | 94,437 | |
Add: Depreciation and amortization | 232,229 | | | 228,921 | | | | | |
| 180,094 | |
Less: Interest income | 3,948 | | | 6,090 | | | | | | | 6,073 | |
Add: Interest charges | 137,864 | | | 141,309 | | | | | | | 126,642 | |
Add: Federal and state income tax expense | 35,718 | | | 43,165 | | | | | | | 29,382 | |
Add: Other corporate costs and noncash items (1) | 1,633 | | | 2,153 | | | | | | | 22,019 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total segment EBITDA | $ | 525,796 | | | $ | 562,123 | | | | | | | $ | 446,501 | |
(1) Adjustments made for Other and Elimination totals not allocated to total segment EBITDA. | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power
Cleco Power is a vertically integrated, regulated electric utility operating within Louisiana and Mississippi and is viewed as 1 unit by management. Discrete financial reports are prepared only at the company level.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 13 — Regulation and Rates |
Provision for rate refund on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted primarily of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | AT DEC. 31, 2020 | AT DEC. 31, 2019 |
TCJA | $ | 2,057 | | $ | 28,700 | |
FERC audit | $ | 1,912 | | $ | 3,482 | |
FRP | $ | 1,786 | | $ | 1,851 | |
Cleco Katrina/Rita storm recovery charges | $ | 1,617 | | $ | 0 | |
Site-specific industrial customer | $ | 710 | | $ | 844 | |
Transmission ROE | $ | 595 | | $ | 1,020 | |
| | |
| | |
TCJA
The provisions of the TCJA reduced the top federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. As a result of the tax rate reduction, on January 1, 2018, Cleco Power began accruing an estimated reserve for the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate. In February 2018, the LPSC directed utilities, including Cleco Power, to provide considerations of the appropriate manner to flow through to ratepayers the benefits of the reduction in corporate income taxes as a result of the TCJA. In July 2019, the LPSC approved Cleco Power’s rate refund of $79.2 million, plus interest, for the reduction in the statutory federal tax rate for the period from
January 2018 to June 2020. The refund was credited to customers over 12 months beginning August 1, 2019.
In July 2019, the LPSC approved Cleco Power’s motion to address the rate redesign and the regulatory liability for excess ADIT, resulting from the enactment of the TCJA, in Cleco Power’s current base rate case.
As a result of the delay in the rate case, on July 15, 2020, the LPSC approved Cleco Power’s application to extend the TCJA bill credits at the same rate as determined in the initial TCJA refund of approximately $7.0 million per month. The extension was for the period of August 2020 through November 2020. On November 13, 2020, Cleco Power again received approval of its application to extend the TCJA bill credits from November 30, 2020, until such time that the rate case is complete. The $7.0 million monthly refund will consist of approximately $4.4 million, which is to be funded by the unprotected excess ADIT, and approximately $2.5 million, which is the change in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $2.1 million accrued for the estimated federal tax-related benefits from the TCJA. The mechanism to refund the remaining balance of the excess ADIT will be determined in Cleco Power’s current LPSC base rate case. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $352.4 million accrued for the excess ADIT, of which $18.5 million is reflected in current regulatory liabilities. Cleco Power’s current base rate case is ongoing and management is unable to determine its outcome.
FERC Audit
For more information about the FERC audit, see Note 15 — “Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — FERC Audit.”
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
FRP
Cleco Power’s annual retail earnings are subject to an FRP that was approved by the LPSC in June 2014. Under the terms of Cleco Power’s current FRP, Cleco Power is allowed to earn a target ROE of 10.0%, while providing the opportunity to earn up to 10.9%. Additionally, 60% of retail earnings between 10.9% and 11.75%, and all retail earnings over 11.75% are required to be refunded to customers. The amount of credits due to customers, if any, is determined by Cleco Power and the LPSC annually. Credits are typically included on customers’ bills the following summer, but the amount and timing of the refunds are ultimately subject to LPSC approval. Cleco Power’s FRP had a four-year term, which was set to expire in June 2018. As a result of the 2016 Merger, the FRP was extended an additional two years with an expiration of June 2020, and Cleco Power was required to file a new base rate case in June 2019 with any change in rates to be implemented in July 2020. On June 28, 2019, Cleco Power filed an application with the LPSC for a new FRP. However, there has been a delay in the current base rate case. Cleco Power has responded to multiple sets of data requests relating to the new FRP. Unless the 2014 FRP were to be extended by order of the LPSC, the FRP rates established in July 2019 will remain in effect, and an FRP monitoring report for the 12-month period ending June 30, 2020, will not be required. Cleco Power anticipates new rates to be effective in the first half of 2021. However, management is unable to determine the outcome of the base rate case relating to the new FRP.
Under the 2014 FRP, Cleco Power must file annual monitoring reports no later than October 31 for the 12-month period ending June 30. Cleco Power filed its monitoring report for the 12 months ended June 30, 2017, on October 31, 2017, indicating that no FRP refund was due. In January 2020, Cleco Power reached an agreement with the LPSC regarding the treatment and realignment of SSR revenue between base and fuel revenue. The result of the realignment confirmed no FRP refund was due for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2017. The monitoring report was approved by the LPSC on February 19, 2020.
Cleco Power filed its monitoring report for the 12 months ended June 30, 2018, on October 31, 2018, indicating no FRP refund was due. The settlement with the LPSC in January 2020 for the treatment and realignment of SSR revenues between base and fuel revenues resulted in a $2.3 million FRP refund for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2018, which was refunded on March 2020 bills as agreed to in the settlement of the 2017 monitoring report. The 2018 monitoring report was approved by the LPSC on March 27, 2020, indicating the FRP refund of $2.3 million and no adjustments to rider FRP.
Cleco Power filed its monitoring report for the 12 months ended June 30, 2019, on October 31, 3019, indicating that no refund was due. Cleco Power has responded to data requests relating to the 2019 FRP monitoring report.
Cleco Power’s monitoring reports also included a $1.2 million annual cost of service savings as a result of the 2016 Merger Commitments. The cost of service savings are not subject to the target ROE or any sharing mechanism. The cost of service savings are refunded annually in September and will continue until Cleco Power’s next FRP is in effect, which is expected in the first half of 2021. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $1.8 million accrued for the estimated cost of service savings refunds.
Cleco Katrina/Rita Storm Recovery Charges
Cleco Katrina/Rita had the right to bill and collect storm restoration costs from Cleco Power’s customers to pay administrative fees, interest, and principal on the Cleco Katrina/Rita storm recovery bonds. Amounts remaining after the final principal and interest payment on the storm recovery bonds, which was paid on March 2, 2020, and payments for final administrative and winding up activities are subject to refund. For more information on the storm recovery bonds, see Note 2 — “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents” and Note 17 — “Intangible Assets, Intangible Liabilities, and Goodwill.”
Transmission ROE
NaN complaints were filed with FERC seeking to reduce the ROE component of the transmission rates that MISO transmission owners, including Cleco Power, may collect under the MISO tariff. As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $0.6 million accrued for the change in ROE. For more information on the ROE complaint, see Note 15 — “Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Litigation — Transmission ROE.”
2016 Merger Commitments
On March 28, 2016, the LPSC approved the 2016 Merger. The LPSC’s written order approving the 2016 Merger was issued on April 7, 2016. Approval of the 2016 Merger was conditioned upon certain commitments, including $136.0 million of customer rate credits. As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had issued $136.0 million of customer rate credits. Also included in the 2016 Merger Commitments were $2.5 million of contributions for economic development for Louisiana state and local organizations to be disbursed over five years, an additional $7.0 million one-time contribution in 2016 for economic development in Cleco Power’s service territory to be administered by Louisiana Economic Development, and $6.0 million of charitable contributions to be disbursed over five years. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $2.1 million remaining accrued for the 2016 Merger Commitments discussed above.
SSR
In September 2016, Cleco Power filed an Attachment Y with MISO requesting retirement of Teche Unit 3 effective April 1, 2017. MISO conducted a study which determined the proposed retirement of Teche Unit 3 would result in violations of specific applicable reliability standards for which no mitigation is available. As a result, MISO designated Teche Unit 3 as an SSR unit until such time that an appropriate alternative solution could be implemented to mitigate reliability issues. One mitigating factor identified was Cleco Power’s Terrebonne to Bayou Vista Transmission project, which was completed in April 2019. Cleco Power received a termination notice, effective April 30, 2019, and filed paperwork to withdraw the filed Attachment Y. While operating as an SSR unit, Cleco Power received monthly payments that included recovery of expenses, including capital expenditures, related to the operations of Teche Unit 3. Additionally, MISO allocated SSR costs to the load serving entities that required the operation of the SSR unit, including Cleco Power. These payments and cost allocations were finalized as part of a MISO SSR settlement approved in December 2018. Cleco Power operated Teche Unit 3 as an SSR unit from April 2017 until April 2019.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Cleco Power expects Teche Unit 3 to be available to run until the estimated 2021 in-service date of the Bayou Vista to Segura Transmission project, at which time Cleco Power does not expect to offer the unit into MISO, barring any grid or customer reliability issues or other similar reasons. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $6.1 million accrued for the net capital refund for capital expenditures paid for by third parties while operating under the SSR agreement. As part of the settlement, one of the load serving entities agreed to reimburse Cleco Power for their portion of the capital refund. Management is unable to determine the timing of the capital refund.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 14 — Variable Interest Entities |
Cleco and Cleco Power apply the equity method of accounting to report the investment in Oxbow in the consolidated financial statements. Under the equity method, the assets and liabilities of this entity are reported as Equity investment in investee on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The revenue and expenses (excluding income taxes) of this entity are netted and reported as equity income or loss from investees on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
Oxbow is owned 50% by Cleco Power and 50% by SWEPCO. Cleco Power is not the primary beneficiary because it shares the power to control Oxbow’s significant activities with SWEPCO. Cleco Power’s current assessment of its maximum exposure to loss related to Oxbow at December 31, 2020, consisted of its equity investment of $9.1 million. During 2020, Cleco Power received $8.0 million from Oxbow as a return of investment.
The following table presents the components of Cleco Power’s equity investment in Oxbow:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
INCEPTION TO DATE (THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Purchase price | $ | 12,873 | | | $ | 12,873 | |
Cash contributions | 6,399 | | | 6,399 | |
Dividend received | (10,200) | | | (2,200) | |
Total equity investment in investee | $ | 9,072 | | | $ | 17,072 | |
The following table compares the carrying amount of Oxbow’s assets and liabilities with Cleco Power’s maximum exposure to loss related to its investment in Oxbow:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Oxbow’s net assets/liabilities | $ | 18,145 | | | $ | 34,145 | |
Cleco Power’s 50% equity | $ | 9,072 | | | $ | 17,072 | |
Cleco Power’s maximum exposure to loss | $ | 9,072 | | | $ | 17,072 | |
The following tables contain summarized financial information for Oxbow:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Current assets | $ | 16,805 | | | $ | 2,239 | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | 4,910 | | | 23,738 | |
Other assets | 3,360 | | | 9,364 | |
Total assets | $ | 25,075 | | | $ | 35,341 | |
Current liabilities | $ | 369 | | | $ | 1,196 | |
Other liabilities | 6,561 | | | 0 | |
Partners’ capital | 18,145 | | | 34,145 | |
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 25,075 | | | $ | 35,341 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating revenue | $ | 34,827 | | | $ | 8,886 | | | $ | 6,992 | |
Operating expenses | 34,827 | | | 8,886 | | | 6,992 | |
Income before taxes | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Prior to June 30, 2020, DHLC mined lignite reserves at Oxbow through the Amended Lignite Mining Agreement. The lignite reserves are intended to be used to provide fuel to the Dolet Hills Power Station. Under the Amended Lignite Mining Agreement, DHLC bills Cleco Power its proportionate share of incurred lignite extraction and associated mining-related costs. Oxbow bills Cleco Power its proportionate share of incurred costs related to mineral rights and land leases. For more information on DHLC and the Oxbow mine, see Note 15 — “Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees — Risks and Uncertainties.”
Oxbow has no third-party agreements, guarantees, or other third-party commitments that contain obligations affecting Cleco Power’s investment in Oxbow.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees |
Litigation
2016 Merger
In connection with the 2016 Merger, 4 actions were filed in the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish, Louisiana and 3 actions were filed in the Civil District Court for Orleans Parish, Louisiana. The petitions in each action generally alleged, among other things, that the members of Cleco Corporation’s Board of Directors breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, conducting an allegedly inadequate sale process, agreeing to the 2016 Merger at a price that allegedly undervalued Cleco, and failing to disclose material information about the 2016 Merger. The petitions also alleged that Como 1, Cleco Corporation, Merger Sub, and, in some cases, certain of the investors in Como 1 either aided and abetted or entered into a civil conspiracy to advance those supposed breaches of duty. The petitions sought various remedies, including monetary damages, which includes attorneys’ fees and expenses.
The 4 actions filed in the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish are captioned as follows:
•Braunstein v. Cleco Corporation, No. 251,383B (filed October 27, 2014),
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
•Moore v. Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets, No. 251,417C (filed October 30, 2014),
•Trahan v. Williamson, No. 251,456C (filed November 5, 2014), and
•L’Herisson v. Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets, No. 251,515F (filed November 14, 2014).
In November 2014, the plaintiff in the Braunstein action moved for a dismissal of the action without prejudice, and that motion was granted in November 2014. In December 2014, the Court consolidated the remaining 3 actions and appointed interim co-lead counsel, and dismissed the investors in Cleco Partners as defendants, per agreement of the parties. Also in December 2014, the plaintiffs in the consolidated action filed a Consolidated Amended Verified Derivative and Class Action Petition for Damages and Preliminary and Permanent Injunction.
The 3 actions filed in the Civil District Court for Orleans Parish were captioned as follows:
•Butler v. Cleco Corporation, No. 2014-10776 (filed November 7, 2014),
•Creative Life Services, Inc. v. Cleco Corporation, No. 2014-11098 (filed November 19, 2014), and
•Cashen v. Cleco Corporation, No. 2014-11236 (filed November 21, 2014).
In December 2014, the directors and Cleco filed declinatory exceptions in each action on the basis that each action was improperly brought in Orleans Parish and should either be transferred to the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish or dismissed. Also, in December 2014, the plaintiffs in each action jointly filed a motion to consolidate the 3 actions pending in Orleans Parish and to appoint interim co-lead plaintiffs and co-lead counsel. In January 2015, the Court in the Creative Life Services case sustained the defendants’ declinatory exceptions and dismissed the case so that it could be transferred to the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish. In February 2015, the plaintiffs in Butler and Cashen also consented to the dismissal of their cases from Orleans Parish so they could be transferred to the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish. By operation of the December 2014 order of the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish, the Butler, Cashen, and Creative Life Services actions were consolidated into the actions pending in Rapides Parish.
In February 2015, the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish held a hearing on a motion for preliminary injunction filed by plaintiffs in the consolidated action seeking to enjoin the shareholder vote for approval of the Merger Agreement. The District Court heard and denied the plaintiffs’ motion. In June 2015, the plaintiffs filed their Second Consolidated Amended Verified Derivative and Class Action Petition. Cleco filed exceptions seeking dismissal of the second amended petition in July 2015. The LPSC voted to approve the 2016 Merger before the Court could consider the plaintiffs’ peremptory exceptions.
In March 2016 and May 2016, the plaintiffs filed their Third Consolidated Amended Verified Derivative Petition for Damages and Preliminary and Permanent Injunction and their Fourth Verified Consolidated Amended Class Action Petition, respectively. The fourth amended petition, which remains the operative petition and was filed after the 2016 Merger closed, eliminated the request for preliminary and permanent
injunction and also named an additional executive officer as a defendant. The defendants filed exceptions seeking dismissal of the fourth amended Petition. In September 2016, the District Court granted the exceptions of no cause of action and no right of action and dismissed all claims asserted by the former shareholders. The plaintiffs appealed the District Court’s ruling to the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal. In December 2017, the Third Circuit Court of Appeal issued an order reversing and remanding the case to the District Court for further proceedings. In January 2018, Cleco filed a writ with the Louisiana Supreme Court seeking review of the Third Circuit Court of Appeal’s decision. The writ was denied in March 2018 and the parties are engaged in discovery in the District Court. In November 2018, Cleco filed renewed exceptions of no cause of action and res judicata, seeking to dismiss all claims. On December 21, 2018, the court dismissed Cleco Partners and Cleco Holdings as defendants per the agreement of the parties, leaving as the only remaining defendants certain former executive officers and independent directors. The District Court denied the defendants’ exceptions on January 14, 2019. A hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion for certification of a class was scheduled for August 26, 2019; however, prior to the hearing, the parties reached an agreement to certify a limited class. On September 7, 2019, the District Court certified a class limited to shareholders who voted against, abstained from voting, or did not vote on the 2016 Merger. Cleco believes that the allegations of the petitions in each action are without merit and that it has substantial meritorious defenses to the claims set forth in each of the petitions.
Gulf Coast Spinning
In September 2015, a potential customer sued Cleco for failure to fully perform an alleged verbal agreement to lend or otherwise fund its startup costs to the extent of $6.5 million. Gulf Coast Spinning Company, LLC (Gulf Coast), the primary plaintiff, alleges that Cleco promised to assist it in raising approximately $60.0 million, which Gulf Coast needed to construct a cotton spinning facility near Bunkie, Louisiana. According to the petition filed by Gulf Coast in the 12th Judicial District Court for Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana (the “District Court”), Cleco made such promises of funding assistance in order to cultivate a new industrial electric customer which would increase its revenues under a power supply agreement that it executed with Gulf Coast. Gulf Coast seeks unspecified damages arising from its inability to raise sufficient funds to complete the project, including lost profits.
Cleco filed an Exception of No Cause of Action arguing that the case should be dismissed. The District Court denied Cleco’s exception in December 2015, after considering briefs and arguments. In January 2016, Cleco appealed the District Court’s denial of its exception by filing with the Third Circuit Court of Appeal. In June 2016, the Third Circuit Court of Appeal denied the request to have the case dismissed. In July 2016, Cleco filed a writ to the Louisiana Supreme Court seeking a review of the District Court’s denial of Cleco’s exception. In November 2016, the Louisiana Supreme Court denied Cleco’s writ application.
In February 2016, the parties agreed to a stay of all proceedings pending discussions concerning settlement. In May 2016, the District Court lifted the stay at the request of Gulf Coast. The parties are currently participating in discovery. Cleco believes the allegations of the petition are contradicted by the written documents executed by Gulf Coast, are
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
otherwise without merit, and that it has substantial meritorious defenses to the claims alleged by Gulf Coast.
Sabine River Flood
In March 2017, Cleco was served with a summons in Perry Bonin, Ace Chandler, and Michael Manuel, et al v. Sabine River Authority of Texas and Sabine River Authority of Louisiana, No. B-160173-C. The action was filed in the 163rd Judicial District Court for Orange County, Texas, and relates to flooding that occurred in Texas and Louisiana in March 2016. The plaintiffs have alleged that the flooding was the result of the release of water from the Toledo Bend spillway gates into the Sabine River. While the plaintiffs have made numerous allegations, they have specifically alleged that Cleco Power, included as one of several companies and governmental bodies, failed to repair 1 of the 2 hydroelectric generators at the Toledo Bend Dam, which in turn contributed to the flooding. Cleco Power does not operate the hydroelectric generator.
The suit was removed to federal court in Texas. The new federal case is Perry Bonin, et al. v. Sabine River Authority of Texas et al., No. 17-cv-134, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Bonin Case). The plaintiffs moved to remand the case to state court, but the district court found that the case raises a substantial federal question and denied the motion to remand. Cleco Power, along with its co-defendants, filed a motion to dismiss on various grounds, primarily arguing that the plaintiffs’ claims are preempted because they infringe on FERC’s exclusive control of dam operations. The district court granted the motion to dismiss in part, declining to rule on some of the arguments raised by the defendants, and granted the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint. The plaintiffs filed a Fifth Amended Complaint in March 2018. Cleco Power filed a new motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims.
In March 2018, approximately 26 other individual plaintiffs filed a petition against Cleco Power and other defendants in Larry Addison, et al. v. Sabine River Authority of Texas, et al., No. D180096-C. The action was filed in the 260th Judicial District Court for Orange County, Texas. The defendants removed the case to federal court in April 2018. The new federal case is Larry Addison, et al. v. Sabine River Authority of Texas, et al., No. 18-cv-153, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The allegations are essentially identical to those in the Bonin Case. Also, in April 2018, Cleco Power filed a motion to dismiss on the same grounds that previously were successful in the Bonin Case. In July 2018, the district court entered an order consolidating the Addison Case with the Bonin Case. Management believes that both cases, as they relate to Cleco Power, have no merit. In August 2018, the Judge entered an order requiring the plaintiffs to file a more definitive statement to clarify the plaintiffs’ claims. In response thereto, the plaintiffs filed a Sixth Amended Petition in September 2018. Cleco Power filed a response in October 2018. All claims were dismissed against Cleco Power by ruling of the Judge on March 18, 2019. The plaintiffs appealed the dismissal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On June 4, 2020, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of all claims against Cleco Power.
Dispute with Saulsbury Industries
In October 2018, Cleco Power sued Saulsbury Industries, Inc., the former general contractor for the St. Mary Clean Energy Center project, seeking damages for Saulsbury Industries, Inc.’s failure to complete the St. Mary Clean Energy Center
project on time and for costs incurred by Cleco Power in hiring a replacement general contractor. The action was filed in the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish, No. 263339. Saulsbury Industries, Inc. removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, on March 1, 2019. On September 14, 2020, Cabot Industries was allowed to join the case pending in the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish.
In January 2019, Cleco Power was served with a summons in Saulsbury Industries, Inc. v. Cabot Corporation and Cleco Power LLC, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. Saulsbury Industries, Inc. alleged that Cleco Power and Cabot Corporation caused delays in the St. Mary Clean Energy Center project, resulting in alleged impacts to Saulsbury Industries, Inc.’s direct and indirect costs. On June 5, 2019, Cleco Power and Cabot Corporation each filed separate motions to dismiss. On October 24, 2019, the District Court denied Cleco’s motion as premature and ruled that Saulsbury Industries, Inc. had six weeks to conduct discovery on specified jurisdictional issues. The Magistrate Judge presiding over the Western District of Louisiana consolidated cases issued a report and recommendation to the District Judge that the case instituted by Saulsbury Industries, Inc. be dismissed without prejudice and the case initiated by Cleco Power be remanded to the Ninth Judicial District Court for Rapides Parish. Saulsbury Industries Inc. did not oppose the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, and the District Judge issued a ruling that adopted the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, which included reasoning consistent with Cleco Power’s arguments. Thus, the federal consolidated cases are now closed.
On October 10, 2019, Cleco Power was served with a summons in Saulsbury Industries, Inc. v. Cabot Corporation and Cleco Power LLC in the 16th Judicial District Court for St. Mary Parish, No. 133910-A. Saulsbury Industries, Inc. asserted the same claim as the Western District Litigation and further asserts claims for payment on an open account. On December 9, 2019, Cleco moved to stay the case, arguing that the Rapides Parish suit should proceed. On February 14, 2020, the court granted Cleco’s motion, which stay order remains in place until lifted. The 16th Judicial District Court for the St. Mary Parish case held a hearing on October 16, 2020, and the judge granted Cleco’s declinatory exceptions of lis pendens. Thus, the St. Mary’s Parish case has been dismissed. Saulsbury filed a motion for a new trial. The hearing on this motion was held on February 5, 2021, and the 16th Judicial District Court judge denied Saulsbury’s motion for a new trial. It is anticipated that this decision will be appealed.
LPSC Audits
Fuel Audit
Generally, Cleco Power’s cost of fuel used for electric generation and the cost of purchased power are recovered through the LPSC-established FAC that enables Cleco Power to pass on to its customers substantially all such charges. Recovery of FAC costs is subject to periodic fuel audits by the LPSC. The LPSC FAC General Order issued in November 1997, in Docket No. U-21497 provides that an audit of FAC filings will be performed at least every other year. On March 31, 2020, Cleco Power received a notice of audit from the LPSC for the period of January 2018 to December 2019. The total amount of fuel expense included in the audit is $565.8 million. Cleco Power has responded to several sets of data
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
requests from the LPSC. Cleco Power has FAC filings for January 2020 and thereafter that remain subject to audit. Management is unable to predict or give a reasonable estimate of the possible range of the disallowance, if any, related to these filings. Historically, the disallowances have not been material. If a disallowance of fuel cost is ordered resulting in a refund, any such refund could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition or cash flows of the Registrants.
Environmental Audit
In 2009, the LPSC issued Docket No. U-29380 Subdocket A, which provides Cleco Power an EAC to recover from its customers certain costs of environmental compliance. The costs eligible for recovery are those for prudently incurred air emissions credits associated with complying with federal, state, and local air emission regulations that apply to the generation of electricity reduced by the sale of such allowances. Also eligible for recovery are variable emission mitigation costs, which are the costs of reagents such as ammonia and limestone that are a part of the fuel mix used to reduce air emissions, among other things. On March 3, 2020, Cleco Power received notice from the LPSC of the EAC audit for the period of January 2018 to December 2019. The total amount of environmental expense included in the audit is $26.2 million. Cleco Power has responded to several sets of data requests from the LPSC. Cleco Power has EAC filings for January 2020 and thereafter that remain subject to audit. Management is unable to predict or give a reasonable estimate of the possible range of the disallowance, if any, related to these filings. Historically, the disallowances have not been material. If a disallowance of environmental cost is ordered resulting in a refund to Cleco Power’s customers, any such refund could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows of the Registrants.
Cleco Power incurs environmental compliance expenses for reagents associated with the compliance standards of MATS. These expenses are also eligible for recovery through Cleco Power’s EAC and are subject to periodic review by the LPSC. In May 2020, the EPA finalized a rule that concluded that it is not appropriate and necessary to regulate hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired electric generating units. However, the EPA concluded that coal- and oil-fired electric generating units would not be removed from the list of regulated sources of hazardous air pollutants and would remain subject to MATS. The EPA also determined that the results of its risk and technology review did not require any revisions to the emissions standards. Several petitions for review of the rule’s findings were filed between May and July 2020 in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. On January 20, 2021, the new Administration issued an executive order, which directs federal agency heads to review regulations and other actions over the past four years to determine if they are inconsistent with the policies announced in the executive order. The Order specifically directs the EPA to consider issuing a proposed rule by August 2021 to suspend, revise, or rescind the rule. Management is unable to determine whether the outcome of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ review or the EPA’s review of the rule as a result of the executive order will result in changes to the MATS standards.
FERC Audit
Generally, Cleco Power records wholesale transmission revenue through approved formula rates, Attachment O of the MISO tariff, and certain grandfathered agreements. The calculation of the rate formulas, as well as FERC accounting and reporting requirements, are subject to periodic audits by FERC. In March 2018, the Division of Audits and Accounting, within the Office of Enforcement of FERC, initiated an audit of Cleco Power for the period of January 1, 2014, through June 30, 2019. On September 27, 2019, Cleco Power received the final audit report, which indicated 12 findings of noncompliance with a combination of FERC accounting and reporting requirements and computation of revenue requirements along with 59 recommendations associated with the audit period. Cleco Power submitted a plan for implementing the audit recommendations on October 28, 2019. Cleco Power also submitted the refund analysis on November 7, 2019, which resulted in a refund related to the FERC audit findings, pending final assessment by the FERC Division of Audits and Accounting, which is expected in the third quarter of 2021. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $1.9 million recorded in Provision for rate refund on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets for the estimated refund. This amount is being refunded to Cleco Power’s wholesale transmission customers as a combination of refund payments and a reduction in Attachment O and grandfathered agreement rates over 12 months beginning June 1, 2020.
Transmission ROE
NaN complaints were filed with FERC seeking to reduce the ROE component of the transmission rates that MISO transmission owners, including Cleco, may collect under the MISO tariff. The complaints sought to reduce the 12.38% ROE used in MISO’s transmission rates to a proposed 6.68%.
The complaints covered the period December 2013 through May 2016. In June 2016, an administrative law judge issued an initial decision in the second rate case docket recommending a 9.70% base ROE. In September 2016, FERC issued a Final Order in response to the first complaint establishing a 10.32% ROE. However, on November 21, 2019, FERC voted to adopt a new methodology for evaluating base ROE for public utilities under the Federal Power Act. In addition, FERC set the MISO transmission owners’ region-wide base ROE at 9.88% for the refund period covered in the first complaint and going forward. The draft FERC order further found that complainants in the second complaint proceeding failed to show that the 9.88% base ROE was unjust and unreasonable and thus dismissed the second complaint. On May 21, 2020, FERC issued Opinion No. 569-A, which granted rehearing in part of Opinion No. 569, which had revised FERC’s methodology for analyzing the base ROE component of public utility rates under section 206 of the Federal Power Act. Opinion No. 569-A further refines FERC’s ROE methodology and finds that the MISO Transmission Owners’ base ROE should be set at 10.02% instead of 9.88%. Cleco Power is unable to determine when a final FERC Order will be issued. As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Power had $0.6 million accrued for the change in the ROE.
In November 2014, the MISO transmission owners committee, of which Cleco is a member, filed a request with FERC for an incentive to increase the new ROE by 50 basis points for RTO participation as allowed by the MISO tariff. In January 2015, FERC granted the request. Beginning January 1, 2020, the collection of the adder was included in MISO’s transmission rates for a total ROE of 10.38%. On June 1, 2020,
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
the total ROE included in MISO’s transmission rate was 10.52%.
South Central Generating
In 2017, Louisiana Generating received insurance settlement proceeds for costs incurred to resolve a lawsuit which was brought by the EPA and the LDEQ against Louisiana Generating related to Big Cajun II, Unit 3. Entergy Gulf States, as co-owner of Big Cajun II, Unit 3, is expected to be allocated a portion of the insurance settlement proceeds. Any amount allocated to Entergy Gulf States will be determined by ongoing litigation and negotiations. South Central Generating estimated this amount to be $10.0 million. As part of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cleco Cajun assumed the $10.0 million contingent liability and NRG Energy indemnified Cleco for losses associated with this litigation matter. As a result, Cleco also recorded a $10.0 million indemnification asset, which was included in the purchase price allocation and included in Other current assets on Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Prior to the Cleco Cajun Transaction, South Central Generating was involved in various litigation matters, including environmental and contract proceedings, before various courts regarding matters arising out of the ordinary course of business. Management is unable to estimate any potential losses that Cleco Cajun may ultimately be responsible for with respect to any one of these matters. As part of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, NRG Energy indemnified Cleco for losses as of the closing date associated with matters that existed as of the closing date, including pending litigation.
Other
Cleco is involved in various litigation matters, including regulatory, environmental, and administrative proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions, arbitrators, and governmental agencies regarding matters arising in the ordinary course of business. The liability Cleco may ultimately incur with respect to any one of these matters may be in excess of amounts currently accrued. Management regularly analyzes current information and, as of December 31, 2020, believes the probable and reasonably estimable liabilities based on the eventual disposition of these matters are $5.4 million and has accrued this amount.
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments and Guarantees
Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power have entered into various off-balance sheet commitments in the form of guarantees and standby letters of credit, in order to facilitate their activities and the activities of Cleco Holdings’ subsidiaries and equity investees (affiliates). Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power have also agreed to contractual terms that require the Registrants to pay third parties if certain triggering events occur. These contractual terms generally are defined as guarantees.
Cleco Holdings entered into these off-balance sheet commitments in order to entice desired counterparties to contract with its affiliates by providing some measure of credit assurance to the counterparty in the event Cleco’s affiliates do not fulfill certain contractual obligations. If Cleco Holdings had not provided the off-balance sheet commitments, the desired counterparties may not have contracted with Cleco’s affiliates, or may have contracted with them at terms less favorable to its affiliates.
The off-balance sheet commitments are not recognized on Cleco and Cleco Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheets because management has determined that Cleco and Cleco
Power’s affiliates are able to perform the obligations under their contracts and that it is not probable that payments by Cleco or Cleco Power will be required.
Cleco Holdings provided guarantees and indemnities to Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States as a result of the sale of the Perryville generation facility in 2005. The remaining indemnifications relate to environmental matters that may have been present prior to closing. These remaining indemnifications have no time limitations. The maximum amount of the potential payment to Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States is $42.4 million. Management does not expect to be required to pay Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States under these guarantees.
On behalf of Acadia, Cleco Holdings provided guarantees and indemnifications as a result of the sales of Acadia Unit 1 to Cleco Power and Acadia Unit 2 to Entergy Louisiana in 2010 and 2011, respectively. The remaining indemnifications relate to the fundamental organizational structure of Acadia. These remaining indemnifications have no time limitations or maximum potential future payments. Management does not expect to be required to pay Cleco Power or Entergy Louisiana under these guarantees.
Cleco Holdings provided indemnifications to Cleco Power as a result of the transfer of Coughlin to Cleco Power in March 2014. Cleco Power also provided indemnifications to Cleco Holdings and Evangeline as a result of the transfer of Coughlin to Cleco Power. The maximum amount of the potential payment to Cleco Power, Cleco Holdings, and Evangeline for their respective indemnifications is $40.0 million, except for indemnifications relating to the fundamental organizational structure of each respective entity, of which the maximum amount is $400.0 million. Management does not expect to be required to make any payments under these indemnifications.
As part of the Amended Lignite Mining Agreement, Cleco Power and SWEPCO, joint owners of Dolet Hills Power Station, have agreed to pay the loan and lease principal obligations of the lignite miner, DHLC, when due if DHLC does not have sufficient funds or credit to pay. Any amounts paid on behalf of the miner would be credited by the lignite miner against future invoices for lignite delivered. The maximum projected payment by Cleco Power under this guarantee is estimated to be $32.6 million; however, the Amended Lignite Mining Agreement does not contain a cap. The projection is based on the forecasted loan and lease obligations to be incurred by DHLC, primarily for purchases of equipment. Cleco Power has the right to dispute the incurrence of loan and lease obligations through the review of the mining plan before the incurrence of such loan and lease obligations. In April 2020, Cleco Power and SWEPCO mutually agreed to not develop additional mining areas for future lignite extraction and subsequently provided notice to the LPSC of the intent to cease mining at the Dolet Hills and Oxbow mines by June 2020. The mine closures are subject to LPSC review and approval. As of December 31, 2020, all lignite reserves intended to be extracted from the Oxbow mine had been extracted. On October 6, 2020, Cleco Power and SWEPCO made a joint filing with the LPSC seeking authorization to close the Oxbow mine and to include and defer certain accelerated mine closing costs in fuel and related ratemaking treatment. The Amended Lignite Mining Agreement does not affect the amount the Registrants can borrow under their credit facilities. Currently, management does not expect to be required to pay DHLC under this guarantee.
Cleco Holdings, in relation to Cleco Cajun’s participation in MISO, and Cleco Power have letters of credit to MISO
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
pursuant to energy market requirements. In June 2020, Cleco Holdings decreased its MISO letter of credit from $34.5 million to $1.3 million. The letters of credit automatically renew each year and have no impact on Cleco Holdings’ or Cleco Power’s revolving credit facility. On February 24, 2021, Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun posted collateral in the amount of $21.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, as a result of increased net purchased power costs related to Winter Storms Uri and Viola exceeding the respective unsecured credit capacity with MISO. For more information on these severe winter storms, see Note 19 — “Storm Restoration — Winter Storms Uri and Viola.”
Generally, neither Cleco Holdings nor Cleco Power has recourse that would enable them to recover amounts paid under their guarantee or indemnification obligations. There are 0 assets held as collateral for third parties that either Cleco Holdings or Cleco Power could obtain and liquidate to recover amounts paid pursuant to the guarantees or indemnification obligations.
Long-Term Purchase Obligations
Cleco Holdings had 0 unconditional long-term purchase obligations at December 31, 2020. Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun have several unconditional long-term purchase obligations primarily related to the purchase of petroleum coke, limestone, energy delivery facilities, information technology outsourcing, natural gas storage, network monitoring, and software maintenance. The aggregate amount of payments required under such obligations at December 31, 2020, is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | CLECO POWER | | CLECO |
For the year ending Dec. 31, | | | |
2021 | $ | 20,991 | | | $ | 45,958 | |
2022 | 21,279 | | | 24,307 | |
2023 | 8,747 | | | 9,906 | |
2024 | 7,984 | | | 8,491 | |
2025 | 7,931 | | | 9,512 | |
Thereafter | 16,515 | | | 10,869 | |
Total long-term purchase obligations | $ | 83,447 | | | $ | 109,043 | |
Cleco’s payments under these agreements for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 were $92.5 million, $94.8 million, and $70.5 million, respectively. Cleco Power’s payments under these agreements for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 were $24.8 million, $35.3 million, and $60.7 million, respectively.
Other Commitments
Cleco has accrued for liabilities related to third parties, employee medical benefits, and AROs.
Risks and Uncertainties
Cleco could be subject to possible adverse consequences if Cleco’s counterparties fail to perform their obligations or if Cleco or its affiliates are not in compliance with loan agreements or bond indentures.
Access to capital markets is a significant source of funding for both short- and long-term capital requirements not satisfied by operating cash flows.
Changes in the regulatory environment or market forces could cause Cleco to determine its assets have suffered an other-than-temporary decline in value, whereby an impairment
would be required and Cleco’s financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun are participants in the MISO market. Energy prices in the MISO market are based on LMP, which includes a component directly related to congestion on the transmission system. Pricing zones with greater transmission congestion may have higher LMPs. Physical transmission constraints present in the MISO market could increase energy costs within pricing zones. Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun use FTRs to mitigate transmission congestion price risks. Changes to anticipated transmission paths may result in an unexpected increase in energy costs.
On March 1, 2019, Cleco Power began to operate Dolet Hills Power Station from June through September of each year; however, Dolet Hills Power Station will continue to be available to operate in other months, if needed. In June 2020, after thorough evaluation, management decided to retire the Dolet Hills Power Station. For more information regarding the Dolet Hills Power Station anticipated closure, see Note 6 — “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — Dolet Hills Closure Costs.”
In April 2020, Cleco Power and SWEPCO mutually agreed to not develop additional mining areas for future lignite extraction and subsequently provided notice to the LPSC of the intent to cease mining at the Dolet Hills and Oxbow mines by June 2020, subject to LPSC review and approval. As of December 31, 2020, all lignite reserves intended to be extracted from the Oxbow mine had been extracted. On October 6, 2020, Cleco Power and SWEPCO made a joint filing with the LPSC seeking authorization to close the Oxbow mine, and to include and defer certain accelerated mine closing costs in fuel and related ratemaking treatment. The expected early closure of the mines has resulted in increased costs that will be billed through the fuel adjustment clause, which management currently believes are recoverable. Management does not believe the early closure of the mines will have an adverse impact on the recovery value of the Dolet Hills Power Station. Cleco Power expects to have sufficient lignite fuel available to continue seasonal operations of the Dolet Hills Power Station through 2021.
Cleco Power anticipates filing an application in March 2021 with the LPSC giving notice that the Dolet Hills Power Station will be retired at the end of 2021 and requesting the approval of the regulatory treatment and recovery of the stranded costs and decommissioning costs over 20 years. For more information regarding the Dolet Hills Power Station closure, see Note 6 — “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities — Dolet Hills Closure Costs.”
In June 2020, Cleco Power remeasured its ARO liabilities due to the expected retirement of the Dolet Hills Power Station. Cleco Power’s ARO liability increased $3.3 million as a result of this remeasurement. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power’s undivided interest in the Dolet Hills Power Station was $99.0 million and was included in base rates. For more information on the accounting treatment of Cleco Power’s AROs, see Note 2 — “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — AROs.”
Fuel costs incurred by Dolet Hills Power Station are recoverable by Cleco Power through active fuel adjustment clauses. Under the Amended Lignite Mining Agreement, DHLC bills Cleco Power its proportionate share of incurred lignite extraction and associated mining-related costs as fuel is delivered. As of December 31, 2020, DHLC estimates $154.2 million of costs will be billed to Cleco Power prior to the closure of the Dolet Hills Power Station. In 2009, Cleco Power acquired an interest in Oxbow, which owns mineral rights and
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
land leases. Under a joint operating agreement pertaining to the Oxbow mineral rights and land leases, Oxbow bills Cleco Power its proportionate share of incurred costs. As of December 31, 2020, Oxbow estimates approximately $7.7 million of costs will be billed to Cleco Power prior to the closure of the Dolet Hills Power Station. If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could materially impact the Registrants’ results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 16 — Affiliate Transactions |
Cleco
Cleco has entered into service agreements with affiliates to receive and to provide goods and professional services. Goods and services received by Cleco primarily involve services provided by Support Group. Support Group provides joint and common administrative support services in the areas of information technology; finance, cash management, accounting, tax, and auditing; human resources; public relations; project consulting; risk management; strategic and corporate development; legal, ethics, and regulatory compliance; facilities management; supply chain and inventory management; and other administrative services.
Cleco Power’s affiliates are charged the higher of management’s estimated fair market value or fully loaded costs for goods and services provided by Cleco Power. Cleco, with the exception of Support Group, charges Cleco Power the lower of management’s estimated fair market value or fully loaded costs for goods and services provided in accordance with service agreements. Support Group bills fully loaded costs to affiliates, which includes payroll and non-payroll costs.
All charges and revenues from consolidated affiliates were eliminated in Cleco’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ending December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.
At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco Holdings had accounts payable of $41.3 million and $33.8 million, respectively, due to Cleco Group primarily for affiliate settlement of taxes payable.
For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, Cleco Holdings made 0 distribution payments to Cleco Group.
Cleco Power
Cleco Power has entered into service agreements with affiliates to receive and to provide goods and professional services. Charges from affiliates included in Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income primarily involve services provided by Support Group in accordance with service agreements. Support Group provides joint and common administrative support services in the areas of information technology; finance, cash management, accounting, tax, and auditing; human resources; public relations; project consulting; risk management; strategic and corporate development; legal, ethics, and regulatory compliance; facilities management; supply chain and inventory management; and other administrative services.
With the exception of Support Group, affiliates charge Cleco Power the lower of management’s estimated fair market value or fully loaded costs for goods and services provided in accordance with service agreements. Support Group charges only fully loaded costs. The following table is a summary of charges from each affiliate included in Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Support Group | | | | | |
Other operations and maintenance | $ | 94,798 | | | $ | 73,090 | | | $ | 56,669 | |
Taxes other than income taxes | $ | 0 | | | $ | (73) | | | $ | 6 | |
Other expense | $ | 43 | | | $ | 64 | | | $ | 290 | |
Cleco Holdings | | | | | |
Other expense | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,007 | |
The majority of the services provided by Cleco Power relates to the lease of office space to Support Group and transmission services to Cleco Cajun. Cleco Power charges affiliates the higher of management’s estimated fair market value or fully loaded costs for goods and services provided in accordance with service agreements.
The following table is a summary of revenue received from affiliates included in Cleco Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Other operations revenue | | | | | |
Cleco Cajun | $ | 6,463 | | | $ | 7,471 | | | $ | 0 | |
Affiliate revenue | | | | | |
Support Group | 4,715 | | | 3,088 | | | 874 | |
Cleco Cajun | 441 | | | 37 | | | 0 | |
Other income | | | | | |
Cleco Holdings | 0 | | | 149 | | | 1,092 | |
Total | $ | 11,619 | | | $ | 10,745 | | | $ | 1,966 | |
Cleco Power had the following affiliate receivable and payable balances associated with the service agreements:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
(THOUSANDS) | ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE | | ACCOUNTS PAYABLE | | ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE | | ACCOUNTS PAYABLE |
Cleco Holdings | $ | 10,353 | | | $ | 57,713 | | | $ | 10,351 | | | $ | 194 | |
Support Group | 3,248 | | | 14,355 | | | 3,172 | | | 13,890 | |
Cleco Cajun | 1,004 | | | 0 | | | 958 | | | 39 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 14,605 | | | $ | 72,068 | | | $ | 14,481 | | | $ | 14,123 | |
Oxbow bills Cleco Power its proportionate share of incurred costs related to mineral rights and land leases. These costs are included in fuel inventory and are recoverable from Cleco Power customers through the LPSC-established FAC or related wholesale contract provisions. For the year December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco Power recorded $17.4 million, and $4.4 million, respectively, of its proportionate share of incurred costs. At December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco Power had $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, payable to Oxbow. For more information on Cleco Power’s variable interest in Oxbow, see Note 14 — “Variable Interest Entities.”
During 2020, Cleco Power made 0 distribution payments to Cleco Holdings. During 2019 and 2018, Cleco Power made $20.0 million, and $121.4 million, respectively, of distribution payments to Cleco Holdings. Cleco Power received 0 equity contributions from Cleco Holdings in 2020, 2019, and 2018.
Cleco Power is the pension plan sponsor and the related trust holds the assets. The net unfunded status of the pension plan is reflected at Cleco Power. The liability of Cleco Power’s affiliates is transferred with a like amount of assets to Cleco
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Power monthly. The following table shows the expense of the pension plan related to Cleco Power’s affiliates for the years ended 2020 and 2019:
| | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | 2019 |
Support Group | $ | 3,155 | | $ | 1,316 | |
Cleco Cajun | $ | 351 | | $ | 239 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 17 — Intangible Assets, Intangible Liabilities, and Goodwill |
During 2008, Cleco Katrina/Rita acquired a $177.5 million intangible asset which includes $176.0 million for the right to bill and collect storm recovery charges from customers of Cleco Power and $1.5 million of financing costs. This intangible asset was fully amortized in March 2020 and had 0 residual value at the end of its life. The intangible asset’s amortization expense was based on the estimated collections from Cleco Power’s customers. Cleco Katrina/Rita records amortization expense based on actual collections. At the date of the 2016 Merger, the gross balance of the Cleco Katrina/Rita intangible asset for Cleco was adjusted to be net of accumulated amortization, as no accumulated amortization existed at such date.
As a result of the 2016 Merger, fair value adjustments were recorded on Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for the valuation of the Cleco trade name and long-term wholesale power supply agreements. At the end of their life, these intangible assets will have 0 residual value. The trade name intangible asset is being amortized over its estimated economic useful life of 20 years. The intangible assets related to the power supply agreements are amortized over the estimated life of each applicable contract ranging between seven and 19 years and the amortization is included in Electric operations on Cleco’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
As a result of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, fair value adjustments were recorded on Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for the difference between the contract and market price of acquired long-term wholesale power agreements. The fair value of intangible assets of $98.9 million and intangible liabilities of $14.2 million was reflected in the purchase price allocation. At the end of their life, these intangible assets and liabilities will have 0 residual value. These intangibles are amortized over the estimated life of each applicable contract ranging between two and eight years. The amortization is included in Electric operations on Cleco’s Consolidated Statement of Income.
As part of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cleco assumed an LTSA for maintenance services related to the Cottonwood Plant. An intangible liability of $24.1 million was reflected in the purchase price allocation and is being amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated remaining life of the LTSA of seven years. The amortization is included as a reduction to the LTSA prepayments on Cleco’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. For more information on the fair value adjustments of intangible assets and liabilities related to the Cleco Cajun Transaction, see Note 3 — “Business Combinations.”
The following tables present Cleco and Cleco Power’s amortization of intangible assets and liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Intangible assets | | | | | |
Cleco Katrina/Rita right to bill and collect storm recover charges | $ | 517 | | | $ | 20,576 | | | $ | 20,608 | |
Trade name | $ | 255 | | | $ | 255 | | | $ | 255 | |
Power supply agreements | $ | 25,600 | | | $ | 24,273 | | | $ | 9,680 | |
Intangible liabilities | | | | | |
LTSA | $ | 3,484 | | | $ | 3,234 | | | $ | 0 | |
Power supply agreements | $ | 3,528 | | | $ | 3,194 | | | $ | 0 | |
NaN impairments for intangibles in the table above for 2020, 2019, and 2018. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Cleco Katrina/Rita right to bill and collect storm recovery charges | $ | 517 | | | $ | 20,576 | | | $ | 20,608 | |
The following tables summarize the balances for intangible assets and liabilities subject to amortization for Cleco and Cleco Power:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Intangible assets | | | |
Cleco Katrina/Rita right to bill and collect storm recovery charges | $ | 70,594 | | | $ | 70,594 | |
Trade name | 5,100 | | | 5,100 | |
Power supply agreements | 184,004 | | | 184,004 | |
Total intangible assets carrying amount | 259,698 | | | 259,698 | |
Intangible liabilities | | | |
LTSA | 24,100 | | | 24,100 | |
Power supply agreements | 14,200 | | | 14,200 | |
Total intangible liabilities carrying amount | 38,300 | | | 38,300 | |
Net intangible assets carrying amount | 221,398 | | | 221,398 | |
Accumulated amortization | (134,526) | | | (115,167) | |
Net intangible assets subject to amortization | $ | 86,872 | | | $ | 106,231 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Cleco Katrina/Rita right to bill and collect storm recovery charges | $ | 177,537 | | | $ | 177,537 | |
Accumulated amortization | (177,537) | | | (177,020) | |
Net intangible assets subject to amortization | $ | 0 | | | $ | 517 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
The following table summarizes the amortization expense related to intangible assets and liabilities expected to be recognized in Cleco’s Consolidated Statements of Income:
| | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | |
(THOUSANDS) | INTANGIBLE ASSETS | INTANGIBLE LIABILITIES |
For the year ending Dec. 31, | | |
2021 | $ | 25,855 | | $ | (5,862) | |
2022 | $ | 25,855 | | $ | (5,041) | |
2023 | $ | 25,628 | | $ | (5,041) | |
2024 | $ | 19,056 | | $ | (5,041) | |
2025 | $ | 5,292 | | $ | (3,875) | |
Thereafter | $ | 10,046 | | $ | 0 | |
Goodwill
In connection with the completion of the 2016 Merger, Cleco recognized goodwill of $1.49 billion. Management assigned the recognized goodwill to the Cleco Power reporting unit. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires significant judgments, including the identification of reporting units, assignments of assets and liabilities to
reporting units, assignment of goodwill to reporting units, and the determination of the fair value of the reporting units.
Cleco conducted its 2020 annual impairment test using an August 1, 2020, measurement date. The fair value of the Cleco Power reporting unit was estimated using a weighted combination of the income approach, which estimates fair value based on discounted cash flows, and the market approach, which estimates fair value based on market comparables within the utility and energy industries. Significant assumptions used in these fair value estimates include estimation of future cash flows related to capital expenditures, long-term rate of growth, and weighted-average cost of capital or discount rate. Changes in these assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and goodwill impairment at Cleco Power. Based on the tests performed, management has determined that the fair value of Cleco Power reporting unit exceeds the carrying value resulting in 0 impairment of Cleco Power’s goodwill for 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 18 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are summarized in the following tables for Cleco and Cleco Power. All amounts are reported net of income taxes. Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.
| | | | | | | | | |
Cleco | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT NET GAIN (LOSS) | | | | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2017 | $ | (2,921) | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | | | | |
Postretirement benefit adjustments incurred during the year | 3,681 | | | | | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | | | | | |
Amortization of postretirement benefit net loss | 1,615 | | | | | |
Reclassification of effect of tax rate change | (589) | | | | | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | 1,786 | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | | | | |
Postretirement benefit adjustments incurred during the year | (18,877) | | | | | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | | | | | |
Amortization of postretirement benefit net gain | (422) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | (17,513) | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | | | | |
Postretirement benefit adjustments incurred during the year | (10,026) | | | | | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | | | | | |
Amortization of postretirement benefit net loss | 1,743 | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | (25,796) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cleco Power | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT NET (LOSS) GAIN | | NET (LOSS) GAIN ON CASH FLOW HEDGES | | TOTAL AOCI |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2017 | $ | (8,377) | | | $ | (5,306) | | | $ | (13,683) | |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | | | | | |
Postretirement benefit adjustments incurred during the year | 954 | | | 0 | | | 954 | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | | | |
Amortization of postretirement benefit net loss | 1,789 | | | 0 | | | 1,789 | |
Reclassification of net loss to interest charges | 0 | | | 254 | | | 254 | |
Reclassification of effect of tax rate change | (1,426) | | | (1,070) | | | (2,496) | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | (7,060) | | | $ | (6,122) | | | $ | (13,182) | |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | | | | | |
Postretirement benefit adjustments incurred during the year | (10,344) | | | 0 | | | (10,344) | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | | | |
Amortization of postretirement benefit net loss | 687 | | | 0 | | | 687 | |
Reclassification of net loss to interest charges | 0 | | | 254 | | | 254 | |
| | | | | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | (16,717) | | | $ | (5,868) | | | $ | (22,585) | |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | | | | | |
Postretirement benefit adjustments incurred during the year | (4,050) | | | 0 | | | (4,050) | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | | | |
Amortization of postretirement benefit net loss | 1,628 | | | 0 | | | 1,628 | |
Reclassification of net gain to interest charges | 0 | | | 254 | | | 254 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Balances, Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | (19,139) | | | $ | (5,614) | | | $ | (24,753) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 19 — Storm Restoration |
Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta
In August and October 2020, Cleco’s service territories were impacted by 3 separate hurricanes. While the hurricanes did not have a material impact on Cleco Cajun, Cleco Power’s distribution and transmission systems sustained substantial damage.
On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall in southwest Louisiana as a Category 4 storm, causing catastrophic damage to portions of Cleco Power’s service territory and causing power outages for approximately 140,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and southwest Louisiana. By September 18, 2020, power was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power.
Cleco Power’s total storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Laura is approximately $180.3 million. Cleco Power continues to work to restore the distribution and transmission systems to their pre-storm condition. The damage to equipment from the storm required replacement, as well as repair of existing assets. Therefore, the balance sheets of Cleco and Cleco Power reflect the capitalization of approximately 62%, or approximately $112.5 million, of the total restoration costs recorded at December 31, 2020. Approximately $9.4 million of the repair-related restoration cost associated with Hurricane Laura was offset against Cleco Power’s existing storm damage reserve, and $54.4 million of costs was recorded as a regulatory asset, as allowed by the LPSC.
On October 9, 2020, Hurricane Delta made landfall in southwest Louisiana as a Category 2 storm resulting in power outages for approximately 132,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and south Louisiana. By October 16, 2020, power was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power. Cleco Power’s total storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Delta is approximately $50.7 million. The damage to equipment from the storm required
replacement, as well as repair of existing assets. Therefore, the balance sheets of Cleco and Cleco Power reflect the capitalization of approximately 65%, or approximately $32.9 million, of the total restoration costs recorded at December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power recognized $17.1 million as a regulatory asset for deferred, non-capital Hurricane Delta storm restoration costs, as allowed by the LPSC.
On October 28, 2020, Hurricane Zeta made landfall in southeast Louisiana as a Category 2 storm resulting in power outages for approximately 73,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in southeast Louisiana. By October 31, 2020, service was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power. Cleco Power’s total storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Zeta is approximately $8.6 million. The damage to equipment from the storm required replacement, as well as repair of existing assets. Therefore, the balance sheets of Cleco and Cleco Power reflect the capitalization of approximately 57%, or approximately $4.9 million, of the total restoration costs recorded at December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2020, Cleco Power recognized $3.5 million as a regulatory asset for deferred, non-capital Hurricane Zeta storm restoration costs, as allowed by the LPSC.
On December 4, 2020, Cleco Power filed an application with the LPSC requesting an interim rate recovery for return on the storm restoration costs associated with the hurricanes until such time securitization of such costs can be completed. Cleco Power, in line with other impacted utilities, will seek available funds from the U.S. government for relief of costs incurred from Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta. Cleco Power cannot predict the likelihood that any reimbursement from the U.S. government ultimately will be approved. In addition to securitization, other recovery options are being analyzed.
Winter Storms Uri and Viola
In February 2021, Cleco’s service territories experienced extreme and unprecedented winter weather that resulted in
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
damage to Cleco Power’s distribution and transmission assets, electricity generation supply shortages, natural gas supply shortages and increased wholesale prices of natural gas in the United States, primarily due to prolonged freezing temperatures.
On February 14, 2021, Winter Storm Uri reached Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 11,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in south Louisiana. By February 17, 2021, power was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power. On February 17, 2021, Winter Storm Viola reached Louisiana resulting in power outages for approximately 43,000 of Cleco Power’s electric customers located primarily in central and south Louisiana. By February 22, 2021, power was restored to 100% of customers who could receive power. Cleco Power’s current estimate of the total storm restoration costs related to Winter Storms Uri and Viola is between $9.0 million and $10.0 million. Cleco Power continues its restoration efforts as damage to its distribution and transmission assets is still being assessed. Cleco Power anticipates the establishment of a regulatory asset for non-capital expenses incurred related to Winter Storms Uri and Viola, subject to LPSC approval.
On February 16, 2021, Cleco was notified by the regional reliability coordinator, MISO, that extremely cold temperatures were causing an increase in demand for power, which resulted in an overload of the power grid. The electricity generation shortages necessitated MISO to implement controlled outages in certain of its service areas. To help protect the stability of the power grid and prevent prolonged outages, MISO instructed Cleco to reduce demand on the power grid by initiating periodic outages to customers across Louisiana. The periodic power outages were minimal and suspended within one hour of initiation at the direction of MISO because the power
shortage was no longer threatening the reliability of the power grid.
Cleco Power’s current estimate of incremental fuel and purchased power costs incurred as a result of Winter Storms Uri and Viola is between $45.0 million and $55.0 million. As a result of of the increase in net purchased power costs exceeding its unsecured credit capacity with MISO, on February 24, 2021, Cleco Power posted collateral in the amount of $21.0 million with MISO. Cleco Power expects to settle the majority of its purchase power obligations with MISO associated with the winter storms and eliminate associated collateral postings by March 9, 2021. These amounts are preliminary estimates and are subject to final settlement. Management expects to seek recovery of these costs through Cleco Power’s FAC. Recovery of these costs are subject to LPSC review and the LPSC could disallow timely and full recovery of these costs.
Cleco Cajun currently estimates the incremental negative impact of Winter Storms Uri and Viola on operations to be between $10.0 million and $15.0 million. As a result of of the increase in net purchased power costs exceeding its unsecured credit capacity with MISO, on February 24, 2021, Cleco Cajun posted collateral in the amount of $5.0 million with MISO. Cleco Cajun expects to settle the majority of its power purchase obligations with MISO associated with the winter storms and eliminate associated collateral postings by March 9, 2021. The incremental impact to Cleco Cajun’s operations is a preliminary estimate and subject to final settlement.
Management is still assessing the expected impact that these winter storms and related events will have on the Registrants’ financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or liquidity.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power (individually, “Registrant” and collectively, the “Registrants”) management, including the CEO and CFO, the Registrants have evaluated the effectiveness of their disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2020. Based on the evaluations, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by each Registrant in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms; and that the Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are also effective in ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Registrants’ management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Remediation of Previously Disclosed Material Weaknesses
The Registrants concluded that the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting previously disclosed in Part II, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” in the Registrants’
Combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, have been remediated. The Registrants implemented new internal controls and enhanced existing internal controls to remediate the aforementioned material weaknesses. These controls were in the following areas:
•Monitoring of meter failures
•Exception identification in key processes
•Estimation monitoring
•Revenue analytics
•System development lifecycle (SDLC)
•Access security
•Change management
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Managements’ Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Registrants are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. The Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting is a
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Registrants’ principal executive and financial officers and effected by the Registrants’ board of managers, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
As a result of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness in future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The management of the Registrants, under the supervision of each of the Registrants’ principal executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an assessment of the
effectiveness of the Registrants’ respective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on this assessment, the management of the Registrants concluded that, as of December 31, 2020, the Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2020, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION |
None
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Cleco Power
The information called for by Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 with respect to Cleco Power is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) to Form 10-K (Omission of Information by Certain Wholly Owned Subsidiaries).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF THE REGISTRANTS |
Boards of Managers of Cleco
As of March 3, 2021, the Board of Managers of Cleco Holdings is comprised of 12 managers, as set forth below. Cleco Power’s Board of Managers is comprised of 13 managers, including the same 12 managers that comprise the Board of Managers of Cleco Holdings, plus one additional manager, Melissa Stark. The Board of Managers of Cleco Holdings and the Board of Managers of Cleco Power are collectively referred to below as “the Boards.” The managers’ ages, dates of appointment, employment history, and committee assignments as of March 3, 2021, are also set forth below. Each of Ms. Scott and Messrs. Gallot, Gilchrist, and Wainer serve pursuant to one-year agreements which are considered for renewal annually by the Boards. Mr. Fontenot serves by virtue of his position as the CEO, and the other managers are designated for membership by BCI, John Hancock, or MIRA.
Andrew Chapman joined MIRA in 2006. During his 14 years with MIRA, Mr. Chapman has served as a director of utility companies owned in part by MIRA’s funds, including Puget Sound Energy, Duquesne Light Company, Aquarion Water Company, Cleco, and entities related to those holdings. Along with Cleco, he now serves on the board for the entity holding Lordstown Energy Center, a gas-fired power plant in eastern Ohio. Mr. Chapman is 65 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2016. He is the Chair of the Business Planning and Budget Review Committee, Chair of the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee, and a member of the Asset Management Committee, the Governance and Public Affairs Committee and the Audit Committee.
Mr. Chapman held executive positions with Elizabethtown Water Company, E-town Corporation, American Water Works and the State of New Jersey prior to joining MIRA in 2006.
Mr. Chapman earned his Master of Business Administration from the Yale School of Management.
William “Bill” Fontenot has served as the President and CEO of Cleco Holdings since January 2018 and CEO of Cleco Power since February 2019. Mr. Fontenot is 58 years old and was appointed to the Boards in 2018. He is a member of the Asset Management Committee, the Business Planning and Budget Review Committee, and the Governance and Public Affairs Committee. During Mr. Fontenot’s 34 years of service, he managed the development and restructuring efforts of generation projects valued at over $900.0 million, as well as led the development and construction of the $1.0 billion power plant, Madison Unit 3. His previous background was in marketing and the development of merchant power businesses.
Mr. Fontenot serves on the boards of the Council for a Better Louisiana, Association of Edison Illuminating Companies, Southeastern Electric Exchange, and the Central
Louisiana Community Foundation. He is a member of St. Rita Catholic Church.
Mr. Fontenot holds a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering from Louisiana State University.
Paraskevas “Paris” Fronimos is a Senior Principal on the Infrastructure and Renewable Resource Investments team of the BC Investment Management Corporation (BCI). He is 46 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2019. Mr. Fronimos is the Chair of the Asset Management Committee and a member of the Business Planning and Budget Review Committee.
Mr. Fronimos joined BCI in 2017 and works with the management teams of portfolio companies primarily in the energy and utility sectors in the Americas. Mr. Fronimos currently serves as a Director of NTS, a Brazilian natural gas pipeline, a Director of Isagen, a Colombian power producer, and Director of Brookfield Brazil Motorways Holdings SRL, a toll road holding company in Barbados. Mr. Fronimos served as a Director of Tribus Services Inc, a U.S. utility services company, from 2018 to 2020. Prior to BCI, Mr. Fronimos was employed by Nova Scotia Power, a Canadian power utility, as a fuels portfolio manager. He has more than 15 years of experience in the energy and utilities space, having worked on environmental and energy policy, developing greenfield energy projects, advising on transactions, and driving fleet and fuel supply optimization activities, including commodity pricing and hedging.
Mr. Fronimos holds a bachelor’s degree in Mineral Resources Engineering from the Technical University of Crete and a Master’s in Business Administration (specializing in Natural Resources and Energy) from the University of Alberta. He is an Energy Risk Professional (ERP®) certified by the Global Association of Risk Professionals.
Richard “Rick” Gallot, Jr. is the President of Grambling State University. He is 54 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2016. Mr. Gallot is a member of the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee and the Governance and Public Affairs Committee.
Mr. Gallot serves on the board of Origin Bancorp, Inc. (Nasdaq: OBNK). He recently served as a Louisiana state senator for District 29, where he held the position of Vice-chair of the Commerce Committee and was a member of the Agriculture, Forestry, Aquaculture, and Rural Development Committee and the Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Committee. He previously served as a member of the Louisiana House of Representatives for District 11, where he served as Chair of the House and Governmental Affairs Committee and was a member of the Executive Committee.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Mr. Gallot obtained his Juris Doctorate from Southern University School of Law and has been a licensed Louisiana Attorney since 1990.
David Randall “Randy” Gilchrist is the President and CEO of Gilchrist Construction Company (GCC), a central Louisiana-based infrastructure contractor specializing in road and bridge construction. He is 61 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2016. Mr. Gilchrist is a member of the Asset Management Committee and the Audit Committee.
Under Mr. Gilchrist’s leadership, GCC has grown since 1985 from a small site work contractor to one of Louisiana’s leading highway contractors. Mr. Gilchrist has served as President of Associated General Contractors, Chair of Driving Louisiana Forward, Chair of the Central Louisiana Chamber of Commerce, and Vice Chair of Central Louisiana Economic Development Alliance. He has also served on the boards of The Rapides Foundation and Rapides Healthcare System.
Gerald Hanrahan is a Senior Industry Advisor to the Power and Infrastructure Team at John Hancock. The Power and Infrastructure Team is responsible for transactions in public utility, independent power project and infrastructure financing areas for John Hancock and manages a portfolio of over $21.0 billion in assets spanning over 300 individual investments. Mr. Hanrahan is 60 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2018. He is a member of the Asset Management Committee.
Mr. Hanrahan joined John Hancock as a director in 2001, served as managing director from 2003 to 2011, and served as Team Leader - Vice President from 2011 until 2016. He has worked in the financing area of the power industry since 1990. Before joining John Hancock, Mr. Hanrahan worked for four years in the Boston and London offices of InterGen, where he coordinated all financing activities on $2.7 billion in power projects in Turkey, Colombia and Egypt. Before that, he spent nine years in the structured finance and financial advisory divisions of Bank of Tokyo Capital Corporation in Boston.
Mr. Hanrahan holds a Master of Business Administration from Babson College and a Bachelor of Science degree from Northeastern University.
Christopher Leslie is Executive Chairman of MIRA Americas. Prior to taking that role in July 2016, Mr. Leslie was the CEO of Macquarie Infrastructure Partners Inc., the manager of MIRA’s U.S.-based private infrastructure funds, Macquarie Infrastructure Partners I, II and III, which collectively manage more than $7.0 billion in U.S. and Canadian infrastructure investments. Mr. Leslie is 56 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2016. He is a member of the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee.
Mr. Leslie joined Macquarie in 1992 in Australia. He has been instrumental in expanding Macquarie’s infrastructure business globally, having launched Macquarie offices in Southeast Asia, India and North America.
Mr. Leslie holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Melbourne.
Jon Perry is a Senior Principal within the Infrastructure & Renewable Resources Department at BCI, where he is responsible for sourcing, executing and managing infrastructure investments. He is 44 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2018. Mr. Perry is the Chair of the Audit Committee.
Mr. Perry has over 10 years of experience in the utility and energy sectors. Prior to working with BCI, he held positions as Manager, Mergers and Acquisitions at TransAlta, a leading Canadian independent power producer and Manager, Regulatory and Financial Reporting at FortisAlberta, a regulated distribution utility. Before then, Mr. Perry held financial and investor relations positions in Canadian junior and mid-cap oil and gas companies.
Mr. Perry holds a Bachelor of Medical Laboratory Sciences from University of British Columbia. He is also a Chartered Accountant in the Province of Alberta and is a Chartered Financial Analyst charter holder.
Aaron Rubin is a Managing Director at MIRA, where he is responsible for MIRA’s North American power and utilities investment team. He is 43 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2018. Mr. Rubin is a member of the Business Planning and Budget Review Committee.
Since joining MIRA in 2008, Mr. Rubin has had extensive responsibility for investment origination and execution as well as for management of portfolio investments. He has also served as the CEO of the Moscow-based Macquarie Russia & CIS Infrastructure Fund, and has been a director of a number of MIRA portfolio companies in the energy, transportation, and communications sectors. Mr. Rubin is currently a director of Lordstown Energy Center, a 940-MW gas-fired power plant construction project in Ohio. Mr. Rubin is also the director of Cyrq Energy, a leading U.S. geothermal power company. Prior to joining MIRA, Mr. Rubin was a Vice President in JPMorgan’s North American mergers and acquisitions team.
Mr. Rubin holds a Bachelor of Commerce and a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Queensland.
Peggy Scott currently serves as the Chair of the Boards. She served as Chairperson and Interim CEO of Cleco Holdings from February 9, 2017, through December 31, 2017. She also serves on Cleco’s Audit Committee and Governance and Public Affairs Committee. Presently, Ms. Scott advises diverse industries, including healthcare and technology. She is 69 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2016.
Ms. Scott serves on the boards of The Eastern Company (Nasdaq: EML), Gresham Smith Partners, and the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation. She served on the board of Benefytt Technologies, Inc. (BFYT) until its 2020 acquisition and on International Plan Solutions, LLC. Previously, she served as the Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and CFO of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana (BCBS) and as Chief Strategy Officer. Prior to BCBS, Ms. Scott was an office Managing Partner with Deloitte and held executive positions in U.S. and International companies where she led transformations, growth strategies, and operations in seven foreign countries.
Ms. Scott was named one of the ten Outstanding Young Women of America, featured in the Wall Street Journal as National Financial Executive of the year, and inducted into the American Institute of CPAs’ Hall of Fame. She is in the Louisiana State University’s Alumni Hall of Distinction, named a Tulane Outstanding Alumnus and holds a Presidential citation.
Ms. Scott is a CPA and also is certified in Valuations and Forensics. She holds a Master of Business Administration from Tulane University and a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Louisiana State University.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Melissa Stark currently serves as the managing principal and owner of Co Issuer Corporate Staffing, LLC, which she established in 2003 to provide independent directors and officers for special purpose entities. She is 58 years old and was appointed in 2016 as a special independent manager of Cleco Power, whose sole purpose is to vote on any bankruptcy-related matters, as specified in Cleco Power’s Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement. From 2001 to 2017, Ms. Stark concurrently served as a principal and co-founder of Water Tower Capital, LLC, a Chicago based investment advisory firm. From 1994 to 1996 she was Vice President - Fixed Income Research at Duff & Phelps (now known as Fitch) where she covered high yield bonds in the retail industry. She served as Vice President - Special Investments at PPM America, Inc. from 1991 to 1994.
Ms. Stark holds a Master of Business Administration in Finance from New York University Stern School of Business.
Steven Turner is a Senior Portfolio Manager within the Infrastructure & Renewable Resources Department at BCI, where he is responsible for sourcing, executing, and managing infrastructure investments. He is 48 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2016. Mr. Turner is the Chair of the Governance and Public Affairs Committee and a member of the Business Planning and Budget Review Committee and the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee.
Mr. Turner serves on the board of Corix Infrastructure Inc., a privately-held waste/wastewater and utility holding company based in Vancouver, British Columbia. He is also a past director of Macquarie Utilities Inc. and Aquarion Water Company (Aquarion), the parent companies to a suite of New England-based water utilities.
Mr. Turner has over 16 years of experience in institutional investing. Prior to joining BCI, he held positions as an Associate with Ventures West Management, a leading
Canadian venture capital firm and as an Associate Equity Analyst with Raymond James Ltd., a full service brokerage firm.
Mr. Turner has a Bachelor of Science degree in Environmental Engineering from Montana Tech of the University of Montana and holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Victoria. He is also a registered Professional Engineer in the Province of British Columbia, a Chartered Financial Analyst charterholder and holds the ICD.D designation.
Bruce Wainer is the CEO of Wainer Enterprises, a family-owned commercial development company on Louisiana’s Northshore and in New Orleans. He is 61 years old and became a member of the Boards in 2016. Mr. Wainer is a member of the Business Planning and Budget Review Committee and the Governance and Public Affairs Committee. He is the developer of some of the most successful commercial developments in the New Orleans area and past chairman of the Northshore Business Council. His business affiliations include partner at Wainer Brothers, All State Financial Company and Circle West Trailer Park Company; president of Quality Properties, Inc., Regent Lands, Inc., Flowers, Inc., Upside Down Cajun Brands, Inc., Louisiana Properties, Inc., Tamco, Inc., Riverhill, Inc., Metro Credit Services, Inc. and Pan American Investors, Inc., and manager of Advance Mortgage Company, LLC.
Executive Officers of Cleco
The names of the executive officers of Cleco and certain subsidiaries, their positions held, five-year employment history, ages, and years of service as of March 3, 2021, are as follows. Executive officers are appointed annually to serve for the ensuing year or until their successors have been appointed.
| | | | | |
NAME OF EXECUTIVE | POSITION AND FIVE-YEAR EMPLOYMENT HISTORY |
William G. Fontenot Cleco Holdings
Cleco Power
Cleco Cajun
| President and CEO since January 2018.
CEO since February 2019; President and CEO from January 2018 to February 2019; Interim CEO from February 2017 to December 2017; Chief Operating Officer from April 2016 to February 2017; Senior Vice President Utility Operations from March 2012 to April 2016.
CEO since February 2019. (Age 58; 34 years of service) |
Kazi K. Hasan Cleco Holdings Cleco Power
Cleco Cajun
| CFO since October 2018; Chief Risk Officer, AES Corporation from late 2014 to May 2018.
CFO since February 2019. (Age 50; 2 years of service) |
| |
| |
Robert R. LaBorde, Jr. Cleco Holdings
Cleco Power
| Chief Operations Officer since February 2019; Vice President Generation Operations & Environmental Services from April 2016 to February 2019.
Vice President Generation Operations from November 2012 to April 2016. (Age 53; 29 years of service) |
|
Justin S. Hilton Cleco Power
Cleco Holdings Cleco Power | President since February 2019.
Vice President MISO Operations from April 2016 to February 2019; General Manager Transmission Strategy from March 2012 to April 2016. (Age 51; 31 years of service) |
Robert E. Adrian Cleco Cajun | Chief Operating Officer since November 2018; CEO, eServices, LLC from January 2012 to November 2018. (Age 61; 2 years of service) |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
NAME OF EXECUTIVE | POSITION AND FIVE-YEAR EMPLOYMENT HISTORY |
J. Robert Cleghorn Cleco Power
Cleco Holdings Cleco Power | Vice President Regulatory Strategy since April 2016.
General Manager Regulatory Strategy & Planning from March 2012 to April 2016. (Age 62; 33 years of service) |
Gregory A. Coco Cleco Power
Cleco Holdings Cleco Power | Vice President Transmission & Distribution Operations since April 2016.
General Manager Brame Energy Center from March 2013 to April 2016. (Age 61; 39 years of service) |
William B. Conway, Jr. Cleco Holdings Cleco Power | Chief Compliance Officer and General Counsel since July 2020; Retired from May 2017 to June 2020; Partner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP from April 2008 to April 2017. (Age 63; < 1 year of service) |
Kristin L. Guillory Cleco Cajun
Cleco Holdings Cleco Power
| President since September 2019.
Treasurer from February 2018 to September 2019; General Manager Finance and Assistant Treasurer from May 2016 to February 2018; Manager Finance Risk and Analytics & Assistant Treasurer from December 2013 to May 2016. (Age 38; 16 years of service) |
Sidney D. Jacobson Cleco Holdings
| Vice President Risk Management since May 2020; Director Risk Management from January 2019 to May 2020; Managing Director, Pivotal Risk Advisors from October 2015 to January 2019. (Age 54; 1 year of service) |
Jeremy J. Kliebert Cleco Holdings Cleco Power | Vice President Corporate Development and Associate General Counsel since September 2020; Associate General Counsel from March 2019 to September 2020; Vice President, Deputy General Counsel, Chief Data Privacy Officer, Chief IP Counsel, and Chief Privacy Counsel, Albemarle Corporation from December 2017 to March 2019; Vice President, Deputy General Counsel, Chief IP Counsel and Data Privacy Counsel, Albemarle Corporation from January 2015 to December 2017. (Age 45; 2 years of service) |
F. Tonita Laprarie Cleco Holdings Cleco Power
Cleco Cajun | Controller & Chief Accounting Officer since July 2016; General Manager Audit & Risk from March 2014 to July 2016.
Controller & Chief Accounting Officer since February 2019. (Age 56; 20 years of service) |
Mark A. Madsen Cleco Holdings | Chief Information & Supply Chain Officer since August 2020; Chief Digital & Information Officer from May 2019 to August 2020; Chief Information Officer, Vice President of IT - Waste Management Inc. from March 2010 to January 2019. (Age 51; 2 years of service) |
Sybil S. Montegut Cleco Holdings | Vice President Enterprise Analytics & Innovation since May 2020; Director Innovation and Transformation from March 2019 to May 2020; General Manager Transformation Office from March 2018 to March 2019; Supervisor Corporate Analytics from May 2016 to March 2018; Senior Investor Relations Analyst from November 2012 to May 2016. (Age 43; 12 years of service) |
Normanique G. Preston Cleco Holdings
| Chief Human Resources & Diversity Officer since September 2019; Vice President Human Resources from August 2018 to September 2019; Vice President - Human Resources, Dynegy, Inc. from November 2015 to June 2018. (Age 54; 2 years of service) |
| |
Eric A. Schouest Cleco Power
Cleco Cajun
Cleco Holdings Cleco Power | Vice President Governmental Affairs since September 2019.
President from February 2019 to September 2019; Interim President from May 2018 to February 2019.
Vice President Governmental Affairs from March 2018 to May 2018; Vice President Marketing South from August 2016 to March 2018; General Manager Governmental Affairs/Regulatory Sales from February 2013 to August 2016. (Age 55; 19 years of service) |
Dean C. Sikes Cleco Holdings Cleco Power | Vice President Engineering, Construction & Project Management since April 2016; General Manager Generation Engineering & Construction from March 2013 to April 2016. (Age 57; 33 years of service) |
Vincent M. Sipowicz Cleco Holdings Cleco Power | Treasurer since May 2020; Director of Investor Relations, AES Corporation from 2015 to April 2020. (Age 47; <1 year of service) |
Marty A. Smith Cleco Power
Cleco Holdings | Vice President Marketing since May 2018; Vice President Marketing North from January 2017 to May 2018; General Manager Distribution Engineering & Real Estate from February 2013 to April 2016.
General Manager Corporate Safety from April 2016 to January 2017. (Age 59; 29 years of service) |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
NAME OF EXECUTIVE | POSITION AND FIVE-YEAR EMPLOYMENT HISTORY |
Russell L. Snyder Cleco Power
| Vice President Generation Operations since February 2019; General Manager Southern Gas Fleet from May 2016 to February 2019; Manager Power Plant (>500 MW) from February 2010 to May 2016. (Age 60; 36 years of service) |
Terry J. Whitmore Cleco Holdings
Cleco Power | Vice President Transmission Services since February 2019.
General Manager Transmission Strategy from May 2016 to February 2019; Manager Transmission Strategy & Support from March 2012 to May 2016. (Age 57; 31 years of service) |
Audit Committee
Cleco has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee. The members of Cleco’s Audit Committee are Andrew Chapman, Randy Gilchrist, Jon Perry (who serves as Chair of the committee) and Peggy Scott. The Boards have determined that Andrew Chapman is the Audit Committee financial expert.
Code of Business Conduct & Ethics and Related Party Transactions
Cleco has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and treasurer. Cleco also has adopted an Ethics Guide applicable to all employees and the Boards. In addition, the Boards have adopted Conflicts of Interest and Related Policies to prohibit certain conduct and to reflect the expectation of the Boards that their members engage in and promote honest and ethical conduct in carrying out their duties and responsibilities, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships and corporate opportunities. Under the Conflicts of Interest and Related Policies, Cleco considers transactions that are reportable under the SEC’s rules for transactions with related parties to be conflicts of interest and prohibits them. Any request, waiver, interpretation or other administration of the policy shall be referred to the Governance and Public Affairs Committee. Any recommendations by the Governance and Public Affairs Committee to implement a waiver shall be referred to the full Boards for a final determination. The Code of Conduct for Financial Managers, Ethics Guide, and Conflicts of Interest and Related Policies are posted on Cleco’s website at https://cleco.com/about/leadership-governance/codes-of-conduct. Each of these documents is also available free of charge by request sent to:
Public Relations, Cleco, P.O. Box 5000, Pineville, LA 71361-5000.
Communications with the Boards
The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for communications with the Boards by interested persons. In order for employees and other interested persons to make their concerns known to the Boards, Cleco has established a procedure for communications with the Boards through the Board’s Chair. The procedure is intended to provide a method for confidential communication, while at the same time protecting the privacy of the members of the Boards. Any interested person wishing to communicate with the Boards, or the non-management members of the Boards, may do so by addressing such communication as follows:
Chair of the Boards of Managers
c/o Corporate Secretary
Cleco Holdings
P.O. Box 5000
Pineville, LA 71361-5000
Upon receipt, Cleco’s Corporate Secretary will forward the communication, unopened, directly to the Chair of the Boards. The Chair will, upon review of the communication, make a determination as to whether it should be brought to the attention of the other non-management members and/or the management member of the Boards and whether any response should be made to the person sending the communication, unless the communication was made anonymously.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A)
This section provides information about the compensation program in place for the Company’s named executive officers who are included in the Summary Compensation Table. It includes a discussion and analysis of the overall objectives of our compensation program and each element of compensation the Company provides.
Executive Summary
2020 Business Highlights
In 2020, the Company had strong operational performance; however, due to impacts from the pandemic and extreme weather-related events, Cleco Power experienced shortfalls in achieving its financial targets. Even so, the Company
continued to work on transformational strategic projects. Below are some of our accomplishments for the year:
•Key Strategic Initiatives
◦Implemented several key elements of the safety strategy focused on improving employee and contractor safety to build a stronger safety culture
◦Reached first quartile achievement on customer satisfaction
◦Established six-year business plan
◦Completed Cleco Cajun’s integration into Cleco’s enterprise business applications
◦Advanced cybersecurity maturity
◦Continuing the organizational transformation efforts related to talent development, succession planning, and diversity and inclusion
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
◦Implemented significant change and protocols due to COVID-19 to align with government regulations and protect employees, contractors, our customers, and our communities
•Effective Utility Operations
◦Effectively restored power following Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeta, in which a total of $239.6 million in storm restoration costs were incurred
•Key Capital Investments and Regulatory Outcomes
◦Continuing construction on the Bayou Vista to Segura Transmission project
◦Continuing the DSMART project
◦Continuing the process to retire the Dolet Hills Power Station
Compensation Philosophy
The compensation principles and philosophy of the Committee are:
•Executives should be rewarded on performance, and incentives should align interests between management and the Company while considering prudent risk taking;
•Total remuneration (the sum of base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives, and retirement benefits) should be aligned with the market median;
◦Newly hired and/or promoted executives should be transitioned to median over time as they become more proficient in their roles;
•The mix of fixed compensation (base salary and retirement benefits) and variable/at-risk compensation (annual incentive and long-term incentive) should align with market by emphasizing variable/at-risk compensation; and
•The competitive market for an executive’s compensation will be based on comparable utilities and will not be adjusted for Cleco’s privately held status or location.
Compensation Program Elements
The Committee targets total compensation (made up of the elements described below) to be competitive with the median of the Comparator Group, but individual positioning may vary above or below the median depending on each executive’s experience, performance, and contribution to the Company. For 2020, we believe that we accomplished our philosophy through the following compensation and benefit components:
| | | | | |
2020 PAY ELEMENT | DESCRIPTION |
Base Salary | • Fixed pay element • Delivered in cash |
Annual Cash Incentive (STIP) | • Performance-based annual incentive plan that pays out in cash • Adjusted EBITDA is the primary metric for the named executive officers • Additional metrics include safety, system reliability, customer service, generation fleet availability, and milestone measures |
Long-Term Incentives | • Performance-based incentive paid in cash currently with a three-year cycle • Payout is contingent on Average ROIC and Total Shareholder Return, each weighted at 50% |
Benefits | • Broad-based benefits such as group medical, dental, vision, and prescription drug coverage; basic life insurance; supplemental life insurance; dependent life insurance; accidental death and dismemberment insurance; a defined benefit pension plan (for those employees hired prior to August 1, 2007); and a 401(k) Plan with a Company match for those employees hired before August 1, 2007, as well as a 401(k) Plan with an enhanced benefit for those employees hired on or after August 1, 2007; same as those provided to all employees |
Executive Benefits | • SERP (closed to new participants in 2014) • Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan |
Perquisites | • Limited to executive physicals, spousal/companion travel, and relocation assistance |
Roles and Responsibilities
Leadership Development and Compensation Committee
The Committee, which consists of one independent Board Manager and three investor Board Managers, is responsible for developing and overseeing the Company’s executive compensation program. The Committee met nine times during 2020, including eight virtual meetings. The Chief Human Resources and Diversity Officer attended the Committee meetings on behalf of management but did not participate in all of the Committee’s executive sessions.
The Committee’s responsibilities, which are more fully described in its charter, include:
•establishing and overseeing the Company’s executive compensation philosophy and goals and the programs which align with those;
•engaging and evaluating an independent compensation consultant;
•determining if the Company’s executive compensation and benefit programs are achieving their intended purpose,
being properly administered and creating proper incentives in light of the Company’s risk factors;
•analyzing the executive compensation and benefits practices of peer companies and annually reporting to the Board or recommending for approval by the Board the overall design of the Company’s executive compensation and benefit programs;
•annually evaluating the performance of the CEO and the CFO and recommending to the Board adjustments in the CEO and CFO’s compensation and benefits;
•overseeing the administrative committees and periodically reviewing the Company’s benefit plans, including retirement plans;
•annually reviewing the Committee’s charter and revising as necessary;
•annually ensuring there is a process for talent and succession management for executives; and
•reviews and makes recommendations on efforts to promote diversity and inclusion.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
The Compensation Consultant
The Committee engaged Pay Governance to consult on matters concerning executive officers’ compensation and benefits. All executive compensation adjustments and award calculations for 2020 were reviewed by Pay Governance on behalf of the Committee. Pay Governance acted at the direction of the Committee and was independent of management. Pay Governance was responsible for:
•recommending a group of peer companies to use for market comparisons;
•reviewing the Company’s executive compensation program, including compensation levels in relation to Company performance, pay opportunities relative to those at comparable companies, short- and long-term incentive targets and metrics, executive retirement benefits, and other executive benefits;
•reviewing the Company’s Board of Manager compensation program;
•reporting on emerging trends and best practices in the area of executive and Board of Manager compensation; and
•attending the Committee meetings.
The Committee reviewed the firm’s qualifications as well as its independence and the potential for conflicts of interest. The Committee concluded that Pay Governance is independent, and its services to the Committee do not create any conflicts of interest. The Committee has the sole authority to approve Pay Governance’s compensation and determine the nature and scope of its services. Pay Governance does not perform any other services for or receive any other fees from the Company.
CEO
The CEO discusses with the Committee base salary adjustments, cash incentives, and long-term incentive awards
for executives other than himself. The CEO participates in meetings of the Committee to discuss executive compensation, including measures and performance targets but is subsequently excused to allow the Committee to meet in executive session without management present.
Evaluation and Design of the Compensation and Benefit Programs
The Committee believes that compensation and benefits for our executive officers who successfully enhance investors’ value should be competitive with the compensation and benefits offered by similar companies in our industry to attract and retain the high quality executive talent required by the Company. The Committee examines executive officers’ compensation against comparable positions using publicly available proxy data for a group of 13 industry peers (Peer Group) and utility industry survey data to help design and benchmark our executive officer compensation. This evaluation includes base salary, annual and long-term incentive plan targets, other potential awards, retirement benefits, and target total compensation. The Peer Group is used to track comparable performance of the long-term incentive plan. The combination of the Peer Group and the utility industry survey data is referred to as the “Comparator Group.”
The Peer Group was unchanged in 2020. The Committee will continue to evaluate the Peer Group annually as companies are often acquired, taken private, or grow at a rate that renders them inappropriate for comparison purposes. The Committee evaluates the Peer Group to ensure that peer companies are of similar scope in relation to revenues, assets, and employee count and have a good operational fit.
| | | | | | | | |
2020 PEER GROUP COMPANIES |
ALLETE, Inc. | Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. | Pinnacle West Capital Corporation |
Alliant Energy Corporation | IDACORP, Inc. | PNM Resources, Inc. |
Avista Corporation | NorthWestern Corporation | Portland General Electric Company |
Black Hills Corporation | OGE Energy Corp. | |
El Paso Electric Company | Otter Tail Corporation | |
In setting executive compensation levels in 2020, the Committee also used utility industry survey data from the most recent Willis Towers Watson Energy Services Executive Compensation Database. Survey data provides a broader energy industry perspective. This survey data is used in conjunction with the Peer Group data as a competitive market reference point for the Committee to consider in determining pay levels.
Decisions Made in 2020 with Regard to Each Compensation and Benefit Component
Base Salary
The base salary levels for the executive officers as a group, including the named executive officers, are set at a level approximating +/-10% of the Comparator Group market median for total remuneration. The Committee sets the base salary level for the CEO and CFO.
Base salaries for the named executive officers in 2020 are shown in the table below:
| | | | | | | | |
NAME | 2020 BASE SALARY | 2020 % CHANGE (1) |
Mr. Fontenot | $ | 700,000 | | 7.7 | % |
Mr. Hasan | $ | 430,000 | | 7.5 | % |
Mr. LaBorde | $ | 290,000 | | 9.4 | % |
Mr. Hilton (2) | $ | 275,000 | | 5.8 | % |
Mr. Adrian (3) | $ | 335,000 | | 3.1 | % |
(1) Base salary increases were adjusted to a level approximating +/-10% of the Comparator Group marketmedian for total remuneration.
(2) Mr. Hilton is a Cleco Power employee.
(3) Mr. Adrian is a Cleco Cajun employee.
Annual Cash Incentive
The Company maintains the STIP, an annual, performance-based cash incentive plan. The STIP applies to all regular, full-time employees, and it includes weighting for corporate and individual performance goals. The STIP award opportunities for executive officers are targeted to approximate the median of
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
the annual cash incentive target award of the Comparator Group. The Committee sets the annual cash incentive level for the CEO and CFO. Payouts are capped at 200% of target.
The table below presents the target STIP opportunities for the named executive officers in 2020:
| | | | | |
NAME | TARGET AS % OF BASE SALARY |
Mr. Fontenot | 100% |
Mr. Hasan | 50% |
Mr. LaBorde | 50% |
Mr. Hilton (1) | 50% |
Mr. Adrian (2) | 50% |
(1) Mr. Hilton is a Cleco Power employee.
(2) Mr. Adrian is a Cleco Cajun employee.
The 2020 STIP award for the named executive officers was based on the corporate and individual performance measures described below. This includes measures that apply to non-named executive officers and employees. The 2020 corporate performance measures consisted of the elements listed below based on the business unit (weighting):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| CONSOLIDATED | | BUSINESS UNIT | | MILESTONE MEASURES |
| SAFETY | ADJUSTED EBITDA | | EFORd | PEAK EAF | CUSTOMER SATISFACTION | LPSC SAIDI | ADJUSTED EBITDA | |
Cleco Power | 10% | 20% | | 10% | | 15% | 5% | 20% | | 20% |
Cleco Support (1) | 10% | 20% | | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 2.5% | 25% | | 20% |
Cleco Cajun | 10% | 20% | | 5% | 15% | | | 30% | | 20% |
(1) Cleco Support business unit weighting evenly split (50% of the Cleco Power weighting and 50% of the Cleco Cajun weighting)
The Committee included Milestone Measures (Measures) in the 2020 STIP corporate metrics for EMT and other corporate officers weighted at 20%. These Measures were associated with progress milestones on key strategic corporate projects related to affordability, the START project, cybersecurity, and the Human Resources strategy. For the STIP calculation, the Committee put the greatest emphasis on financial performance using an adjusted EBITDA metric at both the business unit and consolidated levels. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization adjusted for certain pension and SERP expenses, gains and losses on certain life insurance policies, 2016 Merger and Cleco Cajun transaction related expenses, variable lease revenue, and gains and losses on FTRs and gas-related contract derivatives. In addition, to continually focus the entire organization on the importance of safety, system reliability, generation fleet availability, and to focus Cleco Power and Cleco Support executives and employees on customer satisfaction the remainder of the bonus opportunity was attributable to these operational measures.
Management recommended the STIP financial performance and other measures to the Committee. Based on the historical performance relative to target and the relative historical performance versus the Peer Group, the Committee reviews, revises as appropriate, and approves the STIP measures for the upcoming year.
Details Related to Corporate Performance Metrics Established to Determine 2020 STIP Award Levels
Metric # 1: Safety Consolidated — For 2020, the Company included both the frequency of incidents represented by the Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) and the severity of incidents represented by the Days Away, Restricted or Transferred (DART) rate for its safety measure. Each of these measures represents 5% of the overall STIP award for the corporate measures totaling 10% for the safety metric. The targets for both safety measures were based on the average
rates of the companies in the Southeastern Electric Exchange, of which Cleco is a member, over the period 2018-2019.
| | | | | |
SAFETY - TRIR MATRIX (5%) | |
PERFORMANCE LEVEL | % OF TRIR TARGET AWARD PAID |
Above 0.655 | 0% |
0.586 - 0.655 | 50% |
0.515 - 0.585 | 100% |
0.444 - 0.514 | 150% |
At or below 0.443 | 200% |
2020 Result (0.458) | 150% |
| | | | | |
SAFETY - DART MATRIX (5%) | |
PERFORMANCE LEVEL | % OF DART TARGET AWARD PAID |
Above 0.359 | 0% |
0.301 - 0.359 | 50% |
0.242 - 0.300 | 100% |
0.183 - 0.241 | 150% |
At or below 0.182 | 200% |
2020 Result (0.196) | 150% |
Metric # 2: Adjusted EBITDA Consolidated — The following Adjusted EBITDA matrix was developed to determine performance and payout ranges related to consolidated Adjusted EBITDA performance in 2020. This measure represents 30% of the overall STIP award for the corporate measures for non-executives and 20% of the overall STIP award for the corporate measures for executives. The final percentage of the financial target award is interpolated based on the performance level.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
ADJUSTED EBITDA MATRIX - CONSOLIDATED (20%) | |
PERFORMANCE LEVEL | % OF FINANCIAL TARGET AWARD PAID |
At or below $475.97 million | 0% |
Below $534.80 and above $475.97 million | 50% |
$534.80 million | 100% |
Above $534.80 and below $593.63 million | 150% |
At or above $593.63 million | 200% |
2020 Result - $520.70 million | 88% |
Metric # 3: EFORd — This metric represents the probability a generator will fail either completely or in part when its operation is required and is 10% of the overall STIP award for the Cleco Power measures, 7.5% of the overall STIP award for the Cleco Support corporate measures (Cleco Support employees weighting is 50% of the Cleco Power weighting and 50% of the Cleco Cajun weighting), and 5% of the overall STIP award for the Cleco Cajun corporate measures. The 2020 target was based on the average performance over the three-year period of 2017-2019.
| | | | | |
EFORd MATRIX - CLECO POWER (10%) | |
PERFORMANCE LEVEL | % OF EFORd TARGET AWARD PAID |
Above 8.29% | 0% |
6.66% - 8.29% | 50% |
5.02% - 6.65% | 100% |
3.39% - 5.01% | 150% |
At or below 3.38% | 200% |
2020 Result (5.76%) | 100% |
| | | | | |
EFORd MATRIX - CLECO CAJUN (5%) | |
PERFORMANCE LEVEL | % of EFORd TARGET AWARD PAID |
Above 12.65% | 0% |
10.40% - 12.64% | 50% |
8.15% - 10.39% | 100% |
5.89% - 8.14% | 150% |
At or below 5.88% | 200% |
2020 Result (6.69%) | 150% |
Metric # 4: Peak EAF - Cleco Cajun and Cleco Support — This metric represents the amount of time that the power generation plant is able to produce electricity without any outages or deratings over a peak period (defined as May through September, Monday through Friday, hours ending 0700 through 2200), divided by the amount of time in the peak period and is 15% of the overall STIP award for the Cleco Cajun corporate measures and 7.5% of the overall STIP award for the Cleco Support corporate measures (Cleco Support employees weighting is 50% of the Cleco Cajun weighting). The 2020 target was based on the Cajun fleet’s average performance over the three-year period of 2017-2019.
| | | | | |
PEAK EAF MATRIX - CLECO CAJUN (15%) | |
PERFORMANCE LEVEL | % OF PEAK EAF TARGET AWARD PAID |
Below 91.63% | 0% |
At or above 91.63% | 100% |
2020 Result (97.67%) | 100% |
Metric # 5: Customer Satisfaction - Cleco Power and Cleco Support — The Company included Customer Satisfaction in its performance measures in 2020 using the JD Power South Midsize segment (JD Power study) for comparison. For the STIP metric, the Company used the 2019 performance of the JD Power study to set the target. In addition, the Company compared its overall performance against its peers in the JD Power study. This metric represents 15% of the overall STIP award for Cleco Power corporate measures and 7.5% of the overall STIP award for the Cleco Support corporate measures (Cleco Support employees weighting is 50% of the Cleco Power weighting). The Committee used discretion to decrease the payout for officers to 50% of the target based on its review of 2020 performance. The resulting payout for 2020 was calculated as follows:
| | | | | |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION MATRIX - CLECO POWER (15%) | |
PERFORMANCE LEVEL | % OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION TARGET AWARD PAID |
Below 675 | 0% |
675 - 715 | 50% |
716 - 736 | 100% |
737 - 745 | 150% |
At or above 746 | 200% |
2020 Result (773) | 200% |
Metric # 6: LPSC SAIDI - Cleco Power and Cleco Support — SAIDI measures the average amount of time a customer’s service is interrupted during the year and is measured in hours per customer per year and excludes major events per the LPSC’s criteria. The 2020 LPSC SAIDI goal was based on the long-term goal of consistent performance improvement compared to the LPSC target. This metric represents 5% of the overall STIP award for the Cleco Power corporate measures and 2.5% of the overall STIP award for the Cleco Support corporate measures (Cleco Support employees weighting is 50% of the Cleco Power weighting).
| | | | | |
LPSC SAIDI MATRIX - CLECO POWER (5%) | |
PERFORMANCE LEVEL | % OF LPSC SAIDI TARGET AWARD PAID |
Above 2.87 | 0% |
At or below 2.87 | 100% |
2020 Result (2.69) | 100% |
Metric # 7: Adjusted EBITDA — The following Adjusted EBITDA matrix was developed to determine performance and payout ranges related to Adjusted EBITDA performance in 2020. This measure represents 30% for Cleco Power, 35% for Cleco Support (Cleco Support employees weighting 50% of the Cleco Power weighting and 50% of the Cleco Cajun weighting), 40% for Cleco Cajun of the overall STIP award for the corporate measures for non-executives and 20% for Cleco
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Power, 25% for Cleco Support (Cleco Support employees weighting is 50% of the Cleco Power weighting and 50% of the Cleco Cajun weighting), 30% for Cleco Cajun of the overall STIP award for the corporate measures for executives. The final percentage of the financial target award is interpolated based on the performance level.
| | | | | |
ADJUSTED EBITDA MATRIX - CLECO POWER (20%) | |
PERFORMANCE LEVEL | % OF FINANCIAL TARGET AWARD PAID |
At or below $386.28 million | 0 | % |
Below $417.60 and above $386.28 million | 50 | % |
$417.60 million | 100 | % |
Above $417.60 and below $448.92 million | 150 | % |
At or above $448.92 million | 200 | % |
2020 Result - $381.60 million | 0 | % |
| | | | | |
ADJUSTED EBITDA MATRIX - CLECO CAJUN (30%) | |
PERFORMANCE LEVEL | % OF FINANCIAL TARGET AWARD PAID |
At or below $88.59 million | 0 | % |
Below $116.10 million and above $88.59 million | 50 | % |
$116.10 million | 100 | % |
Above $116.10 and below $143.63 million | 150 | % |
At or above $143.63 million | 200 | % |
2020 Result - $139.40 million | 184.6 | % |
Metric # 8: Milestone Measures — Cleco officers had an additional STIP metric for 2020. This metric represents 20% of the overall STIP award for the corporate measures for executives and measures progress on certain strategic initiatives. The four broad initiatives included the business plan execution (5%), the business application strategy (5%), cybersecurity (5%), and the organizational transformation (5%). The Committee evaluated the performance of each initiative and determined the 2020 result for the Milestone Measures as follows.
| | | | | |
MILESTONE MEASURES (20%) | |
2020 RESULTS | % OF MILESTONE TARGET AWARD PAID |
Cleco Power | 85% |
Support Group | 85% |
Cleco Cajun | 85% |
Total Payout for EMT Cleco Power: The calculated STIP payout for Cleco Power was 94.6% of target. The executive management team used discretion to decrease the payout for officers by 1% of target to provide an increased incentive for non-officers. The resulting total STIP corporate payout of 93.6% for 2020 was calculated as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| % OF TARGET | x | AWARD LEVEL | = | % OF PAYOUT |
Safety Consolidated | 10 | % | | 150.0 | % | | 15.0 | % |
Adjusted EBITDA Consolidated | 20 | % | | 88.0 | % | | 17.6 | % |
EFORd | 10 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 10.0 | % |
Customer Satisfaction | 15 | % | | 200.0 | % | | 30.0 | % |
LPSC SAIDI | 5 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 5.0 | % |
Adjusted EBITDA | 20 | % | | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % |
Milestone Measures | 20 | % | | 85.0 | % | | 17.0 | % |
Total | | | | | | 94.6 | % |
Executive Team Discretion | | | | | | (1.0) | % |
Resulting Total | 100 | % | | | | 93.6 | % |
Total Payout for EMT Cleco Support: The calculated STIP payout for Cleco Support was 111.0% of target. The executive management team used discretion to decrease the payout for officers by 1% of target to provide an increased incentive to non-officers. The resulting total STIP corporate payout of 110.0% for 2020 was calculated as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| % OF TARGET | x | AWARD LEVEL | = | % OF PAYOUT |
Safety Consolidated | 10 | % | | 150.0 | % | | 15.0 | % |
Adjusted EBITDA Consolidated | 20 | % | | 88.0 | % | | 17.6 | % |
EFORd | 7.5 | % | | 117.0 | % | | 8.8 | % |
Peak EAF | 7.5 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 7.5 | % |
Customer Satisfaction | 7.5 | % | | 200.0 | % | | 15.0 | % |
LPSC SAIDI | 2.5 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 2.5 | % |
Adjusted EBITDA | 25 | % | | 111.0 | % | | 27.6 | % |
Milestone Measures | 20 | % | | 85.0 | % | | 17.0 | % |
Total | | | | | | 111.0 | % |
Executive Team Discretion | | | | | | (1.0) | % |
Resulting Total | 100 | % | | | | 110.0 | % |
Total Payout for EMT Cleco Cajun: The calculated STIP payout for Cleco Cajun was 127.5% of target. The executive management team used discretion to decrease the payout for officers by 1% of target to provide an increased incentive to non-officers. The resulting total STIP corporate payout of 126.5% for 2020 was calculated as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| % OF TARGET | x | AWARD LEVEL | = | % OF PAYOUT |
Safety Consolidated | 10 | % | | 150.0 | % | | 15.0 | % |
Adjusted EBITDA Consolidated | 20 | % | | 88.0 | % | | 17.6 | % |
EFORd | 5 | % | | 150.0 | % | | 7.5 | % |
Peak EAF | 15 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 15.0 | % |
Adjusted EBITDA | 30 | % | | 184.6 | % | | 55.4 | % |
Milestone Measures | 20 | % | | 85.0 | % | | 17.0 | % |
Total | | | | | | 127.5 | % |
Executive Team Discretion | | | | | | (1.0) | % |
Resulting Total | 100 | % | | | | 126.5 | % |
The Committee also has the authority to adjust the amount of any individual STIP award upon recommendation by the CEO. Adjustments for the STIP participants, except for the named executive officers and other members of EMT, may be
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
made by the CEO at his discretion. Adjustments are based on the annual performance review process.
Long-Term Compensation
In 2020, the Committee continued a cash-based LTIP and issued grants for the three-year cycle for the performance period ending December 31, 2021. The metrics for the LTIP cycle issued in 2020 are weighted 50% on the three-year Average ROIC and 50% on the three-year cumulative TSR.
Each executive officer’s target LTIP award level is set, so in combination with other pay elements, it will deliver a total compensation opportunity comparable to that of our Peer Group. The chart below details the targeted opportunity for each of the named executives expressed as a percentage of base salary:
| | | | | |
NAME | TARGET AS % OF BASE SALARY(1) |
Mr. Fontenot | 231 | % |
Mr. Hasan | 110 | % |
Mr. LaBorde | 100 | % |
Mr. Hilton (2) | 110 | % |
Mr. Adrian (3) | 110 | % |
(1) Long-term incentives were adjusted to a level approximating +/-10% of the Comparator Group market
median for total remuneration.
(2) Mr. Hilton is a Cleco Power employee.
(3) Mr. Adrian is a Cleco Cajun employee.
2018-2020 LTIP Award
The Leadership Development & Compensation Committee approved an overall award level of 81.02% of target for the LTIP three-year performance cycle that ended on December 31, 2020. This award level represents an average ROE of 8.502% and a cumulative Adjusted EBITDA for LTIP of $1.56 billion over the three-year performance period. This award will be paid in cash and is included in column G of the Summary Compensation Table for 2020.
Retirement Plans - Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company maintains a Deferred Compensation Plan so that members of the Boards, executive officers, and certain key employees may defer receipt and taxation of certain forms of compensation. Members of the Boards may defer up to 100% of their compensation; executive officers and other key employees may defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their annual cash incentive. The use of deferred compensation plans is prevalent within our industry and within the companies in the Peer Group. The Company does not match deferrals or contribute to the plan. Actual participation in the plan is voluntary. The notional investment options made available to participants are selected by the CFO. The allocation of deferrals among investment options is made by individual participants. The notional investment options include money market, fixed income, and equity funds. No changes were made to the plan during 2020.
Retirement Plans - SERP
The Company maintains a SERP for the benefit of the executive officers who are designated as participants by the Committee. SERP was designed to attract and retain executive officers who have contributed and will continue to contribute to our overall success by ensuring that adequate compensation will be provided or replaced during retirement. In July 2014, the Cleco Corporation Board of Directors voted to close SERP to new participants.
Benefits under SERP vest after ten years of service or upon death or disability while a participant is employed by the Company. The Committee may reduce the vesting period, which typically would occur in association with recruiting efforts. Benefits, whether or not vested, are forfeited in the event a participant is terminated for cause.
Generally, benefits are based upon a participant’s attained age at the time of separation from service. The maximum benefit is payable at age 65 and is 65% of final compensation. Payments from the Company’s defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan), certain employer contributions to the 401(k) Plan and payments paid or payable from prior and subsequent employers’ defined benefit retirement or similar supplemental plans reduce or offset SERP benefits. If a participant has not attained age 55 at the time of separation and receives SERP benefits before attaining age 65, SERP benefits are actuarially reduced to reflect early payment. The “Pension Benefits” table lists the present value of accumulated SERP benefits for the named executive officers as of December 31, 2020.
In 2011, the Committee amended SERP to eliminate the business transaction benefit previously included in SERP, as well as the requirement that a SERP participant be a party to an employment agreement to receive change in control benefits.
With regard to current SERP participants, two participants have agreed to fix the base compensation portion of their SERP calculation as of December 31, 2020. Additionally, they have agreed to use target rather than actual awards under the annual incentive plan for years 2017 and 2020 for the average incentive award portion of the SERP calculation. A third participant’s SERP benefit will be set at a specified amount based upon the year of separation.
In the event a SERP participant’s employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company without cause, or the participant terminates his or her employment on account of good reason, occurring within the 36-month period following a change in control event for all participants who commenced participation in SERP prior to October 28, 2011, or the 24-month period following a change in control event for all participants who commenced participation in SERP on or after October 28, 2011, such participant’s benefit shall: (i) become fully vested; (ii) be increased by adding three years to an affected participant’s age, subject to a minimum benefit of 50% of final compensation; and (iii) be subject to a modified reduction determined by increasing the executive’s age by three years.
Change in Employment Status and Change in Control Events
During 2020, the Company had no employment agreements with named executives other than the agreement with Mr. Fontenot as President & CEO. The Company may enter into employment agreements with its executives generally in connection with recruiting efforts. The standard agreement provides for a non-renewing term, generally two years, and does not contain a change in control tax gross-up provision.
The Cleco Corporation Executive Severance Plan
In recognition of the non-renewal of executive employment contracts, the Cleco Corporation Board of Directors adopted the Cleco Corporation Executive Severance Plan (the Executive Severance Plan) on October 28, 2011. The Executive Severance Plan provides the executive officers and other key employees with cash severance benefits in the event
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
of a termination of employment, including involuntary termination in connection with a change in control.
Perquisites and Other Benefits
The Company may make available the following perquisites to its executive officers:
•Executive officer physicals - as a condition of receiving their STIP award, we require and pay for an annual physical for the executive officers and their spouses;
•Spousal/companion travel - in connection with the various industry, governmental, civic, and entertainment activities of the executive officers, we pay for spousal/companion travel associated with such events;
•Relocation program - in addition to the standard relocation policy available to all employees, we maintain a policy whereby the executive officers and other key employees may request that the Company pay real estate agent and certain other closing fees should the officer or key employee sell his/her primary residence or that the Company purchase the executive officer’s or key employee’s primary residence at the greater of its documented cost (not to exceed 120% of the original purchase price) or average appraised value. Typically, this occurs when an executive officer or key employee relocates at the Company’s request; and
•Purchase program - under the Executive Severance Plan, a covered executive officer may request the Company to purchase his/her primary residence in the event he or she is involuntarily terminated without cause or separates for good reason, either in connection with a change in control and further provided the executive officer relocates more than 100 miles from the residence to be purchased. Limits on the purchase amount are the same as the relocation program described above.
The Committee approves the perquisites based on what it believes is prevailing market practice, as well as specific Company needs. The Company believes the relocation program is an important element in attracting executive talent. Perquisite expenses related to business and spousal companion travel for the executive officers are reviewed by Internal Audit and any exceptions are reported to the Audit Committee.
See the section titled “All Other Compensation” for details of these perquisites and their value for the named executive officers.
The executive officers, including the named executive officers, participate in the other benefit plans on the same terms as other employees. These plans include paid time off for vacation, sick leave, and bereavement; group medical, dental, vision, and prescription drug coverage (including the annual wellness program); basic life insurance; supplemental life insurance; dependent life insurance; accidental death and dismemberment insurance; defined benefit pension plan (for those hired prior to August 1, 2007); and the 401(k) Plan with a Company match for those employees hired before August 1, 2007, as well as a 401(k) Plan with an enhanced benefit for those employees hired on or after August 1, 2007.
Board Compensation
The Governance and Public Affairs Committee may engage the Committee’s independent consultant from time to time to conduct market competitive reviews of the Board
compensation program. Details of the Boards’ compensation are shown in the “Board of Manager Compensation” table.
Other Tools and Analyses to Support Compensation Decisions
Tally Sheets
At least annually, the Committee reviews tally sheets that set forth the items listed below. This review is conducted as part of the comparison of the compensation and benefit components that are prevalent within the Comparator Group. The comparison facilitates discussion with the Committee’s outside independent consultant as to the use and amount of each compensation and benefit component versus the applicable Peer Group.
•Annual compensation expense for each named executive officer - this includes the rate of change in total cash compensation from year-to-year; the annual periodic cost of providing retirement benefits; and the annual cost of providing other benefits such as health insurance, as well as the status of any deferred compensation.
•Reportable compensation - to further evaluate total compensation; to evaluate total compensation of the CEO compared to the other executive officers; and to otherwise evaluate internal equity among the named officers.
•Post-employment payments - reviewed pursuant to the potential separation events discussed in “Potential Payments at Termination or Change in Control.”
Trends and Regulatory Updates
As needed, and generally at least annually, the Committee reviews reports related to industry trends, legislative and regulatory developments, and compliance requirements based on management’s analysis and guidance provided by Pay Governance, as applicable. Plan revisions and compensation program design changes are implemented as needed.
Risk Assessment
The Committee also seeks to structure compensation that will provide sufficient incentives for the executive officers to drive results while avoiding unnecessary or excessive risk taking that could harm the long-term value of the Company. The Committee believes that the following actions and/or measures help achieve this goal:
•the Committee reviews the design of the executive compensation program to ensure an appropriate balance between business risk and resulting compensation;
•the Committee allocates pay mix between base salary and performance-based pay to provide a balance of incentives;
•the design of the incentive measures is structured to align management’s actions with the interests of the investors;
•incentive payments are dependent on the Company’s performance measured against pre-established targets and goals and/or compared to the performance of companies in the Peer Group;
•the range and sensitivity of potential payouts relative to target performance are reasonable;
•the Committee imposes checks and balances on the payment of compensation discussed herein;
•detailed processes establish the Company’s financial performance measures under its incentive plans; and
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
•incentive targets are designed to be challenging, yet achievable, to mitigate the potential for excessive risk-taking behaviors.
IRC Section 409A
IRC Section 409A generally was effective as of January 1, 2005. The section substantially modified the rules governing the taxation of nonqualified deferred compensation. The consequences of a violation of IRC Section 409A, unless corrected, are the immediate taxation of amounts deferred, the imposition of an excise tax and the assessment of interest on the amount of the income inclusion, each of which is imposed upon the recipient of the compensation. The plans, agreements and incentives subject to IRC Section 409A have been operated pursuant to and are in compliance with IRC Section 409A.
IRC Section 162(m)
IRC Section 162(m) limits to $1,000,000 the amount Cleco may deduct in a tax year for compensation paid to covered employees defined as the principal executive officer, principal financial officer (or anyone serving that role in a tax year), the next three highest compensated officers after the CEO and CFO, as well as any covered employees from prior years.
The Committee took actions considered appropriate to preserve the deductibility of compensation paid to executive officers, but the Committee did not adopt a formal policy that required all compensation to be fully deductible. As a result, the Committee may have paid or awarded compensation that it deemed necessary or appropriate to achieve our business goals and to align the interests of our executives with those of Cleco’s investors, whether or not the compensation was fully deductible under IRC Section 162(m).
Executive Officers’ Compensation
Summary Compensation Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION | YEAR | SALARY($) | BONUS($) | | | NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN COMPENSATION ($) | CHANGE IN PENSION VALUE AND NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION EARNINGS ($)(1) | ALL OTHER COMPENSATION ($) | TOTAL ($) |
A | B | C | D | | | E | F | G | H |
William G. Fontenot, | 2020 | $ | 721,154 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,806,020 | | $ | 1,320,099 | | $ | 17,520 | | $ | 3,864,793 | |
President & CEO | 2019 | $ | 639,616 | | $ | 345,000 | | | $ | 1,171,839 | | $ | 1,402,994 | | $ | 17,293 | | $ | 3,576,742 | |
| 2018 | $ | 552,885 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 819,412 | | $ | 0 | $ | 12,921 | | $ | 1,385,218 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Kazi K. Hasan, | 2020 | $ | 443,078 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 243,693 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 19,314 | | $ | 706,085 | |
CFO | 2019 | $ | 400,008 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 257,005 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 31,324 | | $ | 688,337 | |
| 2018 | $ | 46,155 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 942 | | $ | 47,097 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Robert R. LaBorde, Jr., | 2020 | $ | 298,269 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 319,608 | | $ | 485,114 | | $ | 13,693 | | $ | 1,116,684 | |
Chief Operations Officer | 2019 | $ | 261,539 | | $ | 60,000 | | | $ | 363,152 | | $ | 519,366 | | $ | 12,703 | | $ | 1,216,760 | |
| 2018 | $ | 239,231 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 356,506 | | $ | 0 | $ | 28,490 | | $ | 624,227 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Justin S. Hilton, (2) | 2020 | $ | 283,846 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 237,357 | | $ | 376,853 | | $ | 10,050 | | $ | 908,106 | |
President - Cleco Power | 2019 | $ | 253,769 | | $ | 107,500 | | | | $ | 269,359 | | $ | 381,155 | | $ | 7,033 | | $ | 1,018,816 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Robert E. Adrian, (3) | 2020 | $ | 346,731 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 219,308 | | $ | 0 | $ | 18,482 | | $ | 584,521 | |
Chief Operating Officer - Cleco Cajun | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Former Executive Officers: | | | | | | | | | |
Julia E. Callis, (4) | 2020 | $ | 71,250 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 176,462 | | $ | 440,031 | | $ | 378,592 | | $ | 1,066,335 | |
Former Chief Compliance Officer & General Counsel | 2019 | $ | 282,923 | | $ | 67,500 | | | $ | 479,222 | | $ | 544,561 | | $ | 13,762 | | $ | 1,387,968 | |
| 2018 | $ | 268,846 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 486,712 | | $ | 0 | $ | 13,616 | | $ | 769,174 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Anthony L. Bunting, (5) | 2020 | $ | 214,616 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 312,919 | $ | 310,014 | $ | 25,787 | | $ | 863,336 |
Former Chief Transformation Officer | 2019 | $ | 292,523 | | $ | 61,500 | | | $ | 465,619 | | $ | 598,968 | | $ | 21,262 | | $ | 1,439,872 | |
| 2018 | $ | 245,389 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 452,027 | | $ | 886,982 | | $ | 18,806 | | $ | 1,603,204 | |
(1) Amounts in this column include the change in pension value year over year. For 2020, this amount includes the change in pension value from 2019 to 2020. Negative changes in the pension value year over year are reported as $0.
(2) Mr. Hilton was appointed as President of Cleco Power effective February 9, 2019.
(3) Mr. Adrian is classified as a named executive officer for 2020 only.
(4) Ms. Callis resigned from Cleco effective March 13, 2020.
(5) Mr. Bunting retired from Cleco effective August 31, 2020.
General
The Summary Compensation Table sets forth individual compensation information for the CEO, the CFO, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of Cleco and its affiliates for services rendered in all capacities to Cleco and its affiliates during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 (the “named executives” or “named executive
officers”). The table also includes former executive officers, who would have been named executives had they not left the Company. Compensation components represent both payments made to the named executive officers during the year and other forms of compensation, as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
•Column C, “Salary;” Column D, “Bonus;” Column E, “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation;” and Column G, “All Other Compensation” represent cash compensation earned by the named executive in 2020, 2019, or 2018.
•The amounts shown in Column F, “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings,” represent changes in the actuarial value of accrued benefits during 2020, 2019, and 2018 under the Pension Plan and SERP, as applicable. Actuarial value computations are based on assumptions discussed in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 10 — Pension Plan and Employee Benefits.” The 2020 changes shown in Column F are due in part to the actuarial impact from a decrease in the discount rate used to calculate future benefits under the Pension Plan and SERP. Negative changes, if any, are reported as zero. This compensation will be payable to the named executive in future years, generally as post-employment retirement payments.
Salary
Data in Column C includes pay for time worked, as well as pay for time not worked, such as vacation, sick leave, jury duty, bereavement, and holidays. The salary level of each of the named executives is determined by a review of market data for companies comparable in size and scope to Cleco, as discussed under “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Decisions Made in 2020 with Regard to Each Compensation and Benefit Component — Base Salary.” In some instances, merit lump sum payments are used to recognize positive performance when base pay has reached or exceeded the Company’s base pay policy target, and are included in the salary column. Deferral of 2020, 2019, and 2018 base pay made by Mr. Fontenot, Mr. Hasan, and Mr. LaBorde, pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan also is included in the salary column and is further detailed in the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table. Adjustments to base pay are recommended to the Committee typically on an annual basis, and if approved, usually are implemented in January. Base salary changes made in 2020 for our named executives and the reasons for those changes are discussed in “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Decisions Made in 2020 with Regard to Each Compensation and Benefit Component — Base Salary.”
Bonus
Column D, “Bonus” includes non-plan-based, discretionary incentives earned during 2020, 2019, or 2018. Amounts in this column for 2019 represent special awards made to the named executive officers for completion of the Cleco Cajun Transaction. No such awards were earned in 2020 and 2018 by the named executive officers.
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
Column E, “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” contains cash awards earned during 2020 that will be paid in March 2021 under the STIP; earned during 2019 and paid in March 2020 under the STIP; and earned during 2018 and paid in March 2019 under the STIP. Deferral of annual cash incentive payments made by Mr. Fontenot, Mr. Hasan, and Mr. LaBorde pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan also is included in Column E and is further detailed in the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table. Column E also includes cash awards earned during 2020 that will be paid in March 2021;
earned during 2019 that were paid in March 2020, and earned during 2018 that were paid in March 2019 for the LTIP performance periods ended December 31, 2020, December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively.
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
The values in Column F represent the aggregate increase in the actuarial present value of benefits earned by each named executive officer during 2020, 2019, and 2018 under the Pension Plan and SERP, including SERP’s supplemental death benefit provision. These values do not represent cash received by the named executives in 2020, 2019, and 2018; rather, these amounts represent the present value of future retirement payments we project will be made to each named executive. Changes in the present value of the Pension Plan and SERP benefits from December 31, 2019, to December 31, 2020; from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019; and from December 31, 2017, to December 31, 2018, result from an additional year of earned service, compensation changes and the increase (or decrease) in value caused by the change in the discount rate used to compute present value. (Generally, a decrease in the discount rate will increase the present value of benefits and an increase in the discount rate will decrease the present value.) If the discount rate increases by a large enough amount, it can cause the accrued pension and SERP liability to decline versus the prior year. When this occurs, the values reported for Column F are zero.
The present value of the accumulated benefit obligation for each named executive officer is included in the table, “Pension Benefits.” These values are reviewed by the Committee in conjunction with its annual tally sheet analysis. An explanation of why the Company uses SERP and its relationship to other compensation elements can be found in “Decisions Made in 2020 With Regard to Each Compensation and Benefit Component.”
Column F also would include any above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation paid by the Company. There were no such preferential earnings paid by the Company in 2020, 2019, and 2018.
All Other Compensation
Payments made to or on behalf of our named executive officers in Column G, “All Other Compensation,” include the following:
•Contributions by Cleco under the 401(k) Plan on behalf of the named executive officers;
•Term life insurance premiums paid for the benefit of the named executive officers;
•Spousal travel;
•For 2020, for Ms. Callis, a payment for unused vacation at the time of her separation from the Company and severance paid pursuant to her separation agreement;
•For 2020, for Mr. Bunting, a payment for unused vacation at the time of his retirement; and
•Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax due currently and paid by the Company on the annual increase in the named executive officers’ future SERP benefits.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
The value of the Column G items for 2020 for each named executive officer is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| MR. FONTENOT | MR. HASAN | MR. LABORDE | MR. HILTON | MR. ADRIAN | MS. CALLIS | MR. BUNTING |
Cleco Contributions to 401(k) Plan | $ | 11,400 | | $ | 17,100 | | $ | 12,431 | | $ | 9,000 | | $ | 17,100 | | $ | 3,289 | | $ | 11,400 | |
Taxable Group Term Life Insurance | 830 | | 158 | | 350 | | 350 | | 1,382 | | 73 | | 922 | |
Spousal Travel | 1,658 | | 1,356 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Memberships | 700 | | 700 | | 0 | | 700 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Unused vacation payout at separation/retirement | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 14,801 | | 13,465 | |
Severance | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 338,500 | | 0 | |
FICA Tax on SERP | 2,932 | | 0 | | 912 | | 0 | | 0 | | 21,929 | | 0 | |
Total Other Compensation | $ | 17,520 | | $ | 19,314 | | $ | 13,693 | | $ | 10,050 | | $ | 18,482 | | $ | 378,592 | | $ | 25,787 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NAME | GRANT DATE | ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYMENTS UNDER NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS (STIP) | | ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYMENTS UNDER NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS (2020-2022 LTIP GRANT) |
THRESHOLD ($) | TARGET ($) | MAXIMUM ($) | | THRESHOLD ($) | TARGET ($) | MAXIMUM ($) |
A | B | C | D | E | | F | G | H |
Mr. Fontenot | 01/01/20 | $ | 0 | $ | 700,000 | | $ | 1,400,000 | | | $ | 0 | $ | 1,650,000 | | $ | 3,300,000 | |
Mr. Hasan | 01/01/20 | $ | 0 | $ | 215,000 | | $ | 430,000 | | | $ | 0 | $ | 473,000 | | $ | 946,000 | |
Mr. LaBorde | 01/01/20 | $ | 0 | $ | 145,000 | | $ | 290,000 | | | $ | 0 | $ | 290,000 | | $ | 580,000 | |
Mr. Hilton | 01/01/20 | $ | 0 | $ | 137,500 | | $ | 275,000 | | | $ | 0 | $ | 302,500 | | $ | 605,000 | |
Mr. Adrian | 01/01/20 | $ | 0 | $ | 167,500 | | $ | 335,000 | | | $ | 0 | $ | 368,500 | | $ | 737,000 | |
Ms. Callis (1) | 01/01/20 | $ | 0 | $ | 142,500 | | $ | 285,000 | | | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Mr. Bunting | 01/01/20 | $ | 0 | $ | 150,000 | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 0 | $ | 330,000 | | $ | 660,000 | |
(1) Ms. Callis resigned from Cleco effective March 13, 2020. She did not receive a grant under the LTIP for the 2020-2022 performance cycle. In addition, under the terms of her separation, she did not receive a payout under the STIP for 2020. |
General
The target values for each of the Company’s incentive plans — the STIP and the LTIP — are determined as part of the Committee’s review of executive officer compensation. The Committee’s review, supported by data prepared by Pay Governance, includes comparisons of base salary and annual and long-term incentive levels of Cleco executive officers versus the Comparator Group as detailed in “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Evaluation and Design of the Compensation and Benefit Programs.” Targets for both the STIP and the LTIP are set as a percentage of base salary and stated in their dollar equivalent in the table above.
Estimated Future Payments under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (STIP)
See “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Decisions Made in 2020 with Regard to Each Compensation and Benefit Component — Annual Cash Incentive” for a discussion of our 2020 STIP award calculations.
Estimated Future Payments under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (LTIP)
See “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Decisions Made in 2020 with Regard to Each Compensation and Benefit Component — Long-Term Compensation” for a discussion of our grants made in 2020.
Pension Benefits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NAME | PLAN NAME (s) | NUMBER OF YEARS OF CREDITED SERVICE (#) | PRESENT VALUE OF ACCUMULATED BENEFIT ($) | PAYMENTS DURING LAST FISCAL YEAR ($) |
Mr. Fontenot | Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC Pension Plan | 34 | $ | 2,425,250 | | $ | 0 | |
| Cleco Corporation SERP | 34 | $ | 5,474,999 | | $ | 0 | |
Mr. Hasan (1) | Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC Pension Plan | 0 | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
| Cleco Corporation SERP | 0 | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Mr. LaBorde (2) | Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC Pension Plan | 16 | $ | 724,556 | | $ | 0 | |
| Cleco Corporation SERP | 12 | $ | 2,128,687 | | $ | 0 | |
Mr. Hilton (3) | Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC Pension Plan | 31 | $ | 1,815,215 | | $ | 0 | |
| Cleco Corporation SERP | 0 | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Mr. Adrian (4) | Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC Pension Plan | 0 | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
| Cleco Corporation SERP | 0 | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Ms. Callis (5) | Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC Pension Plan | 0 | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
| Cleco Corporation SERP | 13 | $ | 2,669,966 | | $ | 0 | |
Mr. Bunting (6) | Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC Pension Plan | 28 | $ | 2,125,409 | | $ | 33,587 | |
| Cleco Corporation SERP | 28 | $ | 2,801,737 | | $ | 39,746 | |
(1) Mr. Hasan is not a participant in the SERP or the Pension Plan as he was hired after both plans were closed to new participants.
(2) Mr. LaBorde has prior years of service credit under the Pension Plan. He is not currently a participant in the Plan because he was rehired after the Pension Plan was closed to new participants in 2007.
(3) Mr. Hilton is not a participant in the SERP as his appointment to his current position was after the plan was closed to new participants.
(4) Mr. Adrian is not a participant in the SERP or the Pension Plan as he was hired after both plans were closed to new participants.
(5) Ms. Callis is not a participant in the Pension Plan as she was hired after the plan was closed to new participants.
(6) Mr. Bunting retired from the Company on August 31, 2020. He began receiving payments under both plans effective September 1, 2020.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
General
The Company provides executive officers who meet certain tenure requirements benefits from the Pension Plan and SERP. Vesting in the Pension Plan requires five years of service with the Company. Messrs. Fontenot and Hilton are fully vested in the Pension Plan. Mr. LaBorde is fully vested in the Pension Plan based on previous service with the Company. Having been rehired after August 1, 2007, he was no longer eligible to participate in the Pension Plan and was included in an enhanced 401(k) Plan for those employees hired (or rehired) on or after August 1, 2007. Messrs. Hasan and Adrian and Ms. Callis, having been hired after August 1, 2007, were not eligible to participate in the Pension Plan and were included in an enhanced 401(k) Plan for those employees hired on or after August 1, 2007. Mr. Bunting was fully vested in the Pension Plan at his retirement.
Vesting in SERP requires ten years of service. Under the terms of SERP, automatic vesting occurs upon a Change in Control if a participating executive is involuntarily terminated from the Company. Messrs. Fontenot and LaBorde and Ms. Callis are all fully vested in the SERP based on years of service. Messrs. Hasan, Hilton, and Adrian are not participants in the SERP. Mr. Bunting was fully vested in the SERP at his retirement.
The present value of each of the named executive officer’s accumulated benefit values was actuarially calculated and represents the values as of December 31, 2020. These calculations were made using the projected unit credit method for valuation purposes and a discount rate of 2.74%. Other material assumptions relating to the valuation include use of the Pri-2012 Employee and Healthy Retiree gender distinct mortality tables projected generationally using Scale MP-2020 (using White Collar for SERP present values and no collar for Qualified Plan present values), assumed retirement at age 65 and retirement payments in the form of joint and 100% survivor with 10 years certain payment.
The sum of the change in actuarial value of the Pension Plan during 2020 and the change in value of SERP is included in Column F, “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings,” in the Summary Compensation Table. Negative changes, if any, are reported as zero.
Pension Plan
The Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC Pension Plan, restated effective September 1, 2020, is a defined benefit plan funded entirely by employer contributions. Effective August 1, 2007, the Pension Plan was closed to new participants. Employees hired or rehired on or after August 1, 2007 are eligible to participate in an enhanced 401(k) Plan. Mr. Fontenot, Mr. Bunting, and Mr. Hilton were hired prior to August 1, 2007.
Benefits under the Pension Plan are determined by years of service, age at retirement, and highest total average compensation for any consecutive five calendar years during the last ten years of employment. Earnings include base pay, cash incentives, merit lump sums, imputed income with respect to life insurance premiums paid by the Company, pre-tax contributions to the 401(k) Plan, salary and bonus deferrals to the Deferred Compensation Plan, and any other form of payment taxable under IRC Section 3401(a). Earnings exclude reimbursement of expenses, gifts, severance pay, moving expenses, outplacement assistance, relocation allowances, welfare benefits, benefits accrued (other than salary and bonus deferrals) or paid pursuant to the Deferred
Compensation Plan, the value of benefits accrued or paid (including dividends) under the LTIP, income from the exercise of stock options and income from disqualifying stock dispositions. For 2020, the amount of earnings was further limited to $285,000 as prescribed by the IRS.
The formula for calculating the defined benefit under the Pension Plan is as follows:
1. Defined Benefit = Annual Benefit + Supplement Benefit
2. Annual Benefit = Final Average Earnings × Years of Service × Pension Factor
3. Supplement Benefit = (Final Average Earnings - Social Security Covered Compensation) × Years of Service × .0065
The pension factor varies with the retirement year. For 2020, the applicable factor was 1.25%. Social Security-covered income is prescribed by the IRS based on the year of birth.
Benefits from the Pension Plan are generally paid at normal, late or early retirement dates and are subject to a limit prescribed by the IRS, generally $230,000 in 2020. Normal retirement at age 65 entitles the participant to a full pension. A participant may elect to delay retirement past age 65 as long as he/she is actively employed. Years of service continue to accumulate (up to a maximum of 35) and earnings continue to count toward the final earnings calculation. If a participant chooses to retire after age 55 but before normal retirement age, the amount of the annual pension benefit is reduced by 3% per year between ages 55 and 62. For example, the normal pension benefit at age 55 is reduced by 21%.
SERP
SERP is designed to provide retirement income of 65% of an executive officer’s final compensation at normal retirement, age 65. Final compensation under SERP is based on the sum of the highest annual salary paid during the five years prior to termination of employment and the average of the three highest STIP awards paid to the participant during the preceding 60 months. Final compensation also is determined without regard to the IRS limit on compensation. The SERP benefit rate at normal retirement is reduced by 2% per year for each year a participant retires prior to age 65, with a minimum benefit rate of 45% at age 55. The final benefit rate also may be reduced further if a participant separates from service prior to age 55. This actuarially determined reduction factor is equivalent to that used in our Pension Plan, which is 3% for each year from age 55 to 62. For example, if a SERP participant were to terminate service at age 50 and start receiving his or her SERP benefit at age 55, his or her SERP benefit rate would be 35.6%. This is the product of the minimum SERP benefit of 45% reduced by another 21% for early commencement. The actual SERP benefit payments are reduced if a participant is to receive benefit payments from our Pension Plan, has received certain employer contributions related to our 401(k) Plan and/or is eligible to receive retirement-type payments from former employers and subsequent employers, if applicable.
SERP provides survivor benefits, which are payable to a participant’s surviving spouse or other beneficiary. SERP also contains a supplemental death benefit that was added in 1999 to reflect market practice. If a SERP participant dies while actively employed, the amount of the supplemental death benefit is equal to the sum of two times the participant’s annual
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
base salary as of the date of death and the participant’s target bonus payable under the annual incentive plan for the year in which death occurs. If a participant dies after termination of employment, the supplemental benefit is equal to the sum of the participant’s final annual base salary and target bonus payable under the annual incentive plan for the year in which the participant retired or otherwise terminated employment. The supplemental death benefit is not dependent on years of service.
In July 2014, Cleco Corporation’s Board of Directors closed SERP to new participants. In August 2016, the Company’s Board of Managers voted to freeze salary and bonus components used in the final compensation calculation as of December 31, 2017, for two current participants, Ms. Callis and Mr. LaBorde. In December 2017, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Fontenot as its CEO, the terms of which amended the calculation of Mr. Fontenot’s SERP benefit to include a fixed benefit depending upon the year Mr. Fontenot separates from the Company. In May 2018, the Company amended the calculation of Mr. Bunting’s SERP benefit to include a predetermined benefit depending on the year that Mr. Bunting separates from the Company, which was in 2020. With regard to former
employees or their beneficiaries, all terms of SERP will continue.
Estimated Annual Payments
The following table shows the estimated annual payments at age 55 (or actual attained age if greater than 55) to each of the named executives under the Pension Plan and SERP as of December 31, 2020. Amounts shown for former executives reflect actual payments.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| ESTIMATED PAYMENTS AT 55 (OR ACTUAL ATTAINED AGE IF GREATER THAN 55) |
| PENSION | SERP | TOTAL |
Mr. Fontenot | $ | 118,532 | | $ | 121,468 | | $ | 240,000 | |
Mr. Hasan | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Mr. LaBorde | $ | 40,020 | | $ | 60,369 | | $ | 100,389 | |
Mr. Hilton | $ | 97,678 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 97,678 | |
Mr. Adrian | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Ms. Callis | $ | 0 | | $ | 118,853 | | $ | 118,853 | |
Mr. Bunting (1) | $ | 100,762 | | $ | 119,238 | | $ | 220,000 | |
(1) Figures represent actual payments to Mr. Bunting that commenced September 1, 2020. |
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NAME |
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CONTRIBUTIONS IN 2020 ($)(1) | COMPANY CONTRIBUTIONS IN 2020 ($) |
AGGREGATE EARNINGS IN 2020 ($) (2) | AGGREGATE WITHDRAWALS/ DISTRIBUTIONS IN 2020 ($) | AGGREGATE BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2020 ($)(3) |
A | B | C | D | E | F |
Mr. Fontenot | $ | 337,667 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 319,843 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 2,282,572 | |
Mr. Hasan | $ | 15,287 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 7,693 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 33,857 | |
Mr. LaBorde | $ | 48,521 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 113,007 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 685,042 | |
Mr. Hilton | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Mr. Adrian | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Ms. Callis | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Mr. Bunting | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
(1) The amounts in Column B represent deferrals of salary and non-equity incentive compensation payments made to the named executive officers during 2020 and are included in the amounts shown in Columns C and G, respectively, of the Summary Compensation Table.
(2) The aggregate earnings shown in Column D are not included in the Summary Compensation Table. Negative returns are reflected as zero.
(3) The aggregate balances shown in Column F include amounts reported as salary and non-equity incentive compensation payments in the Summary Compensation Table for the current fiscal year, as well as previous years and the earnings on those amounts.
Deferred Compensation
Named executives and other key employees are eligible to participate in the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan. Participants are allowed to defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their annual cash incentive, as reported in Columns C and G in the Summary Compensation Table. Consequently, the executive officer contributions listed in Column B above are made by the participant and not by Cleco. Mr. Fontenot, Mr. Hasan, and Mr. LaBorde elected to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan during 2020. All deferral elections for 2020 were made prior to the beginning of 2020 as required by the regulations under IRC Section 409A. There are no matching contributions made by the Company.
Deferrals become general funds for use by the Company to be repaid to the participant at a pre-specified date. Short-term deferrals may be paid out as early as five years following the end of the plan year (i.e., the year in which compensation was earned). Retirement deferrals are paid at the later of termination of service or the attainment of an age specified by the participant. A bookkeeping account is maintained for each participant that records deferred salary and/or bonus, as well as earnings on deferred amounts. Earnings are determined by the performance of notional investment alternatives, which are
similar to the investments available under the 401(k) Plan. Participants select which of these alternatives will be used to determine the earnings on their own accounts. The Deferred Compensation Plan is not intended to provide for the payment of above-market or preferential earnings (as these terms are defined under the SEC regulations) on compensation deferred under the plan. As such, the Deferred Compensation Plan does not provide a guaranteed rate of return.
Potential Payments at Termination or Change in Control
The following tables “Potential Payments at Termination or Change in Control” detail the estimated value of payments and benefits provided to each of our named executive officers assuming the following separation events occurred as of December 31, 2020: termination by the executive; disability; death; retirement; constructive termination; termination by the Company for cause; and termination in connection with a change in control. The Company has selected these events based on long-standing provisions in our employee benefit plans such as the Pension Plan and 401(k) Plan, or because their use is common within the industry and Comparator Group. Some of the potential severance payments are
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
governed by the separate documents establishing the STIP, LTIP, and SERP.
At its October 2011 meeting, Cleco Corporation’s Compensation Committee approved the Executive Severance Plan to provide severance benefits to executive officers. In October and December 2014 and July 2015, the Cleco Corporation’s Compensation Committee approved amendments to the Executive Severance Plan. At December 31, 2020, all of the named executive officers were covered by the Executive Severance Plan.
The following narrative describes the type and form of payments and benefits for each separation event. The tables under “Potential Payments at Termination or Change in Control” provide an estimate of potential payments and benefits to each named executive officer under each separation event. Throughout this section, reference to “executive officers” is inclusive of named executive officers.
Termination by the Executive
If an executive officer resigns voluntarily, no payments are made or benefits provided other than those required by law.
Disability
Annual disability benefits are payable when a total and permanent disability occurs and are paid until the executive officer’s normal retirement age, which is age 65. This benefit is provided under SERP and is paid regardless of whether the executive was vested in SERP at the time of disability. At age 65, a disabled executive is eligible to receive annual retirement benefits under the Pension Plan, for those who are participants, and SERP as outlined under the headings “Pension Plan” and “SERP,” respectively. The executive officer also is eligible to receive a one-time, prorated share of the current year’s STIP award and a prorated award for each LTIP performance cycle in which he/she participates to the extent those performance cycles award at their completion.
Death
A prorated share of the current year’s STIP award and a supplemental death benefit provided from SERP are paid to an executive officer’s designated beneficiary in the event of death in service. Both are one-time payments. The executive officer’s designated beneficiary also is eligible to receive a prorated award for each LTIP performance cycle in which the executive officer participates to the extent those performance cycles award at their completion.
Annual survivor benefits are payable to an executive officer’s surviving spouse for his/her life, or if there is no surviving spouse, to the executive officer’s designated beneficiary for a period of ten years or, if no designated beneficiary is named, to the executive officer’s estate for a period of ten years. Amounts are calculated under the provisions of the Pension Plan and SERP. For more information, see the discussion under the headings “Pension Plan” and “SERP,” respectively, as well as SERP provisions relating to death while in service. Survivor benefits are paid from SERP regardless of vested status in SERP at the time of death. The SERP supplemental death benefit is paid only to executives who were employed by the Company on or after December 17, 1999. All of our named executives are eligible for the death benefit.
Retirement
In the event of early or normal retirement, the executive officer is eligible to receive a prorated share of the current year’s STIP award and at least a prorated award for each LTIP performance cycle in which he/she participates to the extent those performance cycles award at their completion. Retirement benefits are provided pursuant to the Pension Plan and SERP. Payments are made monthly and are calculated using the assumptions described in the discussion following the “Pension Benefits” table.
Constructive Termination
Payments made and benefits provided upon a constructive termination are ordinarily greater than payments made on account of an executive officer’s retirement, death or disability because separation effectively is initiated by the Company. Certain payments are made contingent upon the execution of a waiver, release and covenants agreement in favor of the Company. Constructive termination also may be initiated by an executive officer if there has been (i) a material reduction in his/her base compensation, other than a reduction uniformly applicable to all executive officers; and (ii) a contemporaneous, material reduction in his/her authority, job duties, or responsibilities.
Under the terms of the Executive Severance Plan, an executive would receive constructive termination payments including up to 52 weeks of base compensation, up to $50,000 in lieu of outplacement services and reimbursement of premiums paid to maintain coverage under our medical plan for up to 18 months. The executive also would be eligible for a prorated portion of the current year’s payout under the STIP and a prorated award for the LTIP performance cycles in which he/she participates to the extent those performance cycles award at their completion.
If the executive officer has vested retirement benefits and has attained eligible retirement age, he/she would receive retirement benefits as described under “Pension Benefits.”
Termination for Cause
“Cause” is defined as an executive’s (i) intentional act of fraud, embezzlement or theft in the course of employment or other intentional misconduct that is materially injurious to the Company’s financial condition or business reputation; (ii) intentional damage to Company property, including the wrongful disclosure of its confidential information; (iii) willful and intentional refusal to perform the essential duties of his/her position; (iv) failure to fully cooperate with government or independent agency investigations; (v) conviction of a felony or crime involving moral turpitude; (vi) willful, reckless, or negligent violation of the material provisions of Cleco’s Code of Conduct; or (vii) intentional, reckless, or intentional acts or failures to act in a manner which materially compromises his/her ability to perform the essential duties of his/her position; or (viii) willful, reckless, or negligent violation of rules related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or rules adopted by the SEC. No payments, other than those required by law, are made or benefits provided under the Executive Severance Plan if an executive officer is terminated for cause. If an executive officer is vested in SERP, that benefit is forfeited. The value of that forfeiture is shown as a negative number in the separation payments tables.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Change in Control
The term “Change in Control” is defined in the LTIP. One or more of the following triggering events constitute a Change in Control:
•Any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), other than the Company or an Affiliate or any “person” who on the effective date of this Plan is a director, officer, or is the “beneficial owner” (as determined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 20% or more of the combined voting power of outstanding securities of the Company or an employee stock ownership plan (within the meaning of Code Section 4975(e)(7)) sponsored by the Company or an Affiliate, is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as determined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 80% or more of the combined voting power of the outstanding securities of the Company;
•The Company is party to a merger or consolidation with another entity and, as a result of such transaction, 80% or more of the combined voting power of outstanding securities of the Company or its successor in the merger (or a direct or indirect parent company of the Company or its successor in the merger) is owned in the aggregate by persons who were not “beneficial owners” (as determined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of securities of the Company immediately before such transaction;
•The Company sells, leases, or otherwise disposes of, in one transaction or in a series of related transactions, all or substantially all of its assets;
•The owners of the Company approve a plan of dissolution or liquidation; or
•All or substantially all of the assets or the issued and outstanding membership interests of Cleco Power LLC is sold, leased or otherwise disposed of in one or a series of related transactions to a person, other than the Company or an Affiliate.
Except as described below, payments are made and benefits provided only if an executive’s employment is terminated during the 60-day period preceding or the 24-month period following the Change in Control.
Termination must be involuntary and by the Company without cause or initiated by the executive on account of “Good Reason.” Good reason means that (i) a Participant’s base compensation in effect immediately before the commencement of a Change in Control Period is materially reduced, or there is a material reduction or termination of such Participant’s rights to any employee benefit in effect immediately prior to such period; (ii) a Participant’s authority, duties or responsibilities are materially reduced from those in effect immediately before the commencement of a Change in Control Period, or such Participant has reasonably determined that, as a result of a change in circumstances that materially affects his or her employment with the Company, he or she is unable to exercise the authority, power, duties and responsibilities assigned to him or her immediately before the
commencement of such period; or (iii) a Participant is required to transfer to an office or business location that is more than 60 miles from the primary location to which he or she was assigned prior to the commencement of a Change in Control Period. No event or condition shall constitute Good Reason hereunder unless (a) a Participant provides to the Committee written notice of his or her objection to such event not later than 60 days after such Participant first learns, or should have learned, of such event; (b) such event is not corrected by the Company promptly after receipt of such notice, but in no event more than 30 days after receipt thereof; and (c) such Participant Separates from Service not more than 15 days following the expiration of the 30-day period described in clause (b) hereof. The executive also must satisfy the conditions included in the waiver, release and covenants agreement defined in the Executive Severance Plan.
Under the Executive Severance Plan, an executive would receive an amount up to two times the sum of annualized base salary and the average non-equity incentive plan bonus over the last three fiscal years and reimbursement of COBRA premiums for up to 24 months. Payments may also include the purchase of the executive officer’s primary residence and reimbursement of relocation expenses, but only if the executive relocates his/her primary residence more than 100 miles. No excise tax payments or gross-ups are made; instead, benefits will be reduced to avoid the imposition of the tax. The numbers shown below do not give effect to this reduction.
Subject to the conditions described above, upon a Change in Control, SERP benefits are: (i) fully vested; (ii) increased by adding three years to an affected executive’s age, subject to a minimum benefit of 50% of compensation; and (iii) subject to a modified actuarial reduction determined by increasing the executive’s age by three years.
If an executive officer is vested and of eligible retirement age, he or she may become eligible to begin to receive the annual retirement benefit described above upon a Change in Control.
The following tables set forth the value of post-employment payments and benefits that are not generally made available to all employees. Each separation event is assumed to occur on December 31, 2020. Retirement is assumed to occur at age 55 or the named executive officer’s actual attained age if greater than 55. Estimated payments under our STIP and LTIP for disability, death, retirement and constructive termination are uncertain until the completion of the performance period/cycle. In the case of the STIP, the performance period is the current fiscal year. The estimated payment for the home purchase and relocation is a projection of the expense to the Company to sell the named executive officer’s principal residence including any loss avoided by the named executive officer by having the right to sell the residence to the Company, plus the projected cost to the Company to relocate the named executive officer.
Pursuant to Item 401(j) of Regulation S-K, the separation events disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are assumed to occur in the past, as of December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Fontenot | | | | | | | |
VALUE OF PAYMENT/BENEFIT | TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE | DISABILITY | DEATH | RETIREMENT | CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION | TERMINATION FOR CAUSE | CHANGE IN CONTROL |
Cash Severance | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 700,000 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 2,415,364 | |
Annual Cash Bonus | 0 | | 793,270 | | 793,270 | | 793,270 | | 793,270 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Long-Term Incentive | 0 | | 2,800,000 | | 2,800,000 | | 2,800,000 | | 2,800,000 | | 0 | | 4,400,000 | |
Cash Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 50,000 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Present Value of Incremental SERP Payments(1) | 0 | | 1,218,652 | | 4,123,006 | | 0 | | 0 | | (2,712,029) | | 2,684,124 | |
SERP Supplemental Death Benefit | 0 | | 0 | | 2,100,000 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Purchase of Principal Residence/Relocation | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 83,500 | |
COBRA Medical Coverage | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 34,338 | | 0 | | 45,784 | |
Total Incremental Value | $ | 0 | | $ | 4,811,922 | | $ | 9,816,276 | | $ | 3,593,270 | | $ | 4,377,608 | | $ | (2,712,029) | | $ | 9,628,772 | |
(1) As of December 31, 2020, Mr. Fontenot was vested in SERP payments, which would be forfeited upon termination for cause.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Hasan | | | | | | | |
VALUE OF PAYMENT/BENEFIT | TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE | DISABILITY | DEATH | RETIREMENT (1) | CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION | TERMINATION FOR CAUSE | CHANGE IN CONTROL |
Cash Severance | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 430,000 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 1,031,337 | |
Annual Cash Bonus | 0 | | 243,693 | | 243,693 | | 0 | | 243,693 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Long-Term Incentive | 0 | | 451,000 | | 451,000 | | 0 | | 451,000 | | 0 | | 913,000 | |
Cash Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 25,000 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Present Value of Incremental SERP Payments | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
SERP Supplemental Death Benefit | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Purchase of Principal Residence/Relocation Expenses | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 83,500 | |
COBRA Medical Coverage | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 34,338 | | 0 | | 45,784 | |
Total Incremental Value | $ | 0 | | $ | 694,693 | | $ | 694,693 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 1,184,031 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 2,073,621 | |
(1) As of December 31, 2020, Mr. Hasan was not eligible for retirement.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. LaBorde | | | | | | | |
VALUE OF PAYMENT/BENEFIT | TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE | DISABILITY | DEATH | RETIREMENT (1) | CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION | TERMINATION FOR CAUSE | CHANGE IN CONTROL |
Cash Severance | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 290,000 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 897,832 | |
Annual Cash Bonus | 0 | | 164,049 | | 164,049 | | 0 | | 164,049 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Long-Term Incentive | 0 | | 483,000 | | 483,000 | | 0 | | 483,000 | | 0 | | 773,500 | |
Cash Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 25,000 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Present Value of Incremental SERP Payments(2) | 0 | | 1,442,412 | | 1,468,620 | | 0 | | 0 | | (1,324,403) | | 1,249,939 | |
SERP Supplemental Death Benefit | 0 | | 0 | | 725,000 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Purchase of Principal Residence/Relocation Expenses | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 83,500 | |
COBRA Medical Coverage | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 30,124 | | 0 | | 40,165 | |
Total Incremental Value | $ | 0 | | $ | 2,089,461 | | $ | 2,840,669 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 992,173 | | $ | (1,324,403) | | $ | 3,044,936 | |
(1) As of December 31, 2020, Mr. LaBorde was not eligible for retirement.
(2) As of December 31, 2020, Mr. LaBorde was vested in SERP payments, which would be forfeited upon termination for cause.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Hilton | | | | | | | |
VALUE OF PAYMENT/BENEFIT | TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE | DISABILITY | DEATH | RETIREMENT (1) | CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION | TERMINATION FOR CAUSE | CHANGE IN CONTROL |
Cash Severance | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 275,000 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 802,278 | |
Annual Cash Bonus | 0 | | 132,841 | | 132,841 | | 0 | | 132,841 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Long-Term Incentive | 0 | | 420,500 | | 420,500 | | 0 | | 420,500 | | 0 | | 717,500 | |
Cash Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 25,000 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Present Value of Incremental SERP Payments | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
SERP Supplemental Death Benefit | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Purchase of Principal Residence/Relocation Expenses | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 83,500 | |
COBRA Medical Coverage | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 30,124 | | 0 | | 40,165 | |
Total Incremental Value | $ | 0 | | $ | 553,341 | | $ | 553,341 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 883,465 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 1,643,443 | |
(1) As of December 31, 2020, Mr. Hilton was not eligible for retirement.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Adrian | | | | | | | |
VALUE OF PAYMENT/BENEFIT | TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE | DISABILITY | DEATH | RETIREMENT (1) | CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION | TERMINATION FOR CAUSE | CHANGE IN CONTROL |
Cash Severance | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 335,000 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 833,692 | |
Annual Cash Bonus | 0 | | 219,308 | | 219,308 | | 0 | | 219,308 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Long-Term Incentive | 0 | | 361,167 | | 361,167 | | 0 | | 361,167 | | 0 | | 726,000 | |
Cash Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 25,000 | | 0 | | 0 | |
SERP Supplemental Death Benefit | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Purchase of Principal Residence/Relocation Expenses | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 83,500 | |
COBRA Medical Coverage | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 21,808 | | 0 | | 29,077 | |
Total Incremental Value | $ | 0 | | $ | 580,475 | | $ | 580,475 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 962,283 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 1,672,269 | |
(1) As of December 31, 2020, Mr.Adrian was not eligible for retirement.
BOARD OF MANAGERS COMPENSATION
2020 Board of Managers Compensation | | | | | | | | |
NAME (1) | FEES EARNED OR PAID IN CASH AND/ OR STOCK ($) | TOTAL ($) |
A | B | C |
Rick Gallot | $ | 150,000 | | $ | 150,000 | |
Randy Gilchrist | $ | 150,000 | | $ | 150,000 | |
Peggy Scott | $ | 232,500 | | $ | 232,500 | |
Melissa Stark | $ | 3,750 | | $ | 3,750 | |
Bruce Wainer | $ | 150,000 | | $ | 150,000 | |
(1)Messrs. Chapman, Fronimos, Hanrahan, Leslie, Perry, Rubin, and Turner were appointed to the Boards by the Owner Group and do not receive additional compensation for their service on the Boards.
General
Column B, “Fees Earned or Paid in Cash and/or Stock” represents cash compensation earned and/or received in 2020.
A non-management Board Manager may elect to participate in the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan and defer the receipt of all or part of his or her fees. Benefits are equal to the amount credited to each Board Manager’s individual account based on compensation deferred plus applicable investment returns as specified by the director upon election to participate in the plan. Investment options are similar to those provided to participants in the 401(k) Plan. Funds may be reallocated between investments at the discretion of the Board Manager. Accounts, which may be designated separately by deferral year, are payable in the form of a single-sum payment or in the form of substantially equal annual installments, not to exceed 15, when a Board Manager ceases to serve on the Cleco’s Boards or attains a specified age.
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash and/or Stock
During 2020, each Board Manager who is not a Cleco employee or appointed by the Owner Group, except Ms. Stark, received an annual cash retainer of $150,000. Ms. Stark received an annual cash retainer of $3,750. During this period, the non-management Chair was compensated with an additional retainer of $82,500.
Board Managers are permitted to defer receipt of their fees under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan. Messrs. Gallot and Gilchrist elected to defer all or a portion of their fees in 2020.
Cleco reimburses Board Managers for travel and related expenses incurred for attending meetings of Cleco’s Boards and Board committees, including travel costs for spouses/companions. No expenses for spouses/companions were incurred during 2020.
Cleco also provides its Board Managers who are not employed by Cleco or appointed by the Owner Group with $200,000 of life insurance and permanent total disability coverage under a group accidental death and dismemberment plan maintained by Cleco Power. The total 2020 premium for all coverage (exempt employees, officers and Board Managers) under this plan was $6,128.
Interests of the Board of Managers
In 2020, no non-management member of Cleco’s Boards performed services for or received compensation from Cleco or its affiliates except for those services relating to his or her duty as a member of Cleco’s Boards.
REPORT OF THE LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee of the Boards (see “Boards of Managers of Cleco” above and “Director Independence and Related Party Transactions” below), includes four managers, one of whom meets the additional requirements for independence which were adopted by the Board. The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee operates under a written charter last revised in November 2019, a copy of which is posted on Cleco’s web site at https://www.cleco.com/about/leadership-governance/board-committees. A copy of this charter also is available free of charge by request sent to: Public Relations, Cleco, P.O. Box 5000, Pineville, LA 71361-5000.
The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee was established in April 2016.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee recommended to the Company’s Boards that the CD&A and related required compensation disclosure tables be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and filed with the SEC.
The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee of the Boards of Managers of Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power
Andrew Chapman, Chair
Christopher Leslie
Rick Gallot
Steven Turner
Leadership Development and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee are set forth above. No members of the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee were officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries during 2020, were former Company officers, or had any relationship otherwise requiring disclosure.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
CEO Pay Ratio
The aggregate compensation of the executive who served in the CEO role in 2020 (Mr. Fontenot) was $3,875,951. This amount differs from the aggregate amount reflected in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because of the inclusion of the value of the Company’s contribution to health and welfare benefits. The median employee’s annual total compensation for 2020 was $115,582, calculated including the same components of total pay as was used for Mr. Fontenot. As a result, we estimate that the CEO’s 2020 annual total compensation was 33.4 times that of the median employee’s annual total compensation. The median employee was determined based on employees of the Company on December 31, 2020, using the consistently applied compensation measure of target total cash
compensation (including base salary and target bonus). Target total cash compensation was annualized for those employees that were not employed for the full year of 2020.
We believe that the above pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. In addition, because the SEC rules for identifying the median employee allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Security Ownership of Directors and Management and Certain Beneficial Owners
Following the closing of the 2016 Merger, there are no longer any outstanding shares of Cleco Corporation common stock.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Cleco has no compensation plans under which equity securities are awarded.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
Director Independence and Related Party Transactions
Cleco’s Boards have adopted categorical standards to assist them in making determinations of managers’ independence. These categorical standards are posted on Cleco’s web site at https://cleco.com/about/leadership-governance/governance-guidelines. A copy of the standards is also available free of charge by request sent to: Public Relations, Cleco, P.O. Box 5000, Pineville, LA 71361-5000. The Boards have determined that Rick Gallot (member of the Boards of Cleco Group, Cleco
Holdings and Cleco Power), Randy Gilchrist (member of the Boards of Cleco Group, Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power), Peggy Scott (member of the Boards of Cleco Group, Cleco Holdings, and Cleco Power), Melissa Stark (member of the Board of Cleco Power), and Bruce Wainer (member of the Boards of Cleco Group, Cleco Holdings and Cleco Power) are independent within the meaning of the categorical standards adopted by the Boards.
Cleco has no relationships to report under Item 407(a)(3).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
Audit fees | $ | 3,005,041 | | | $ | 3,740,200 | |
Audit related fees | 13,000 | | | 707,300 | |
Tax fees | 550,000 | | | 570,000 | |
Other fees | 4,700 | | | 21,700 | |
Total | $ | 3,572,741 | | | $ | 5,039,200 | |
The Audit fees include professional fees rendered by PwC for financial statement audits and reviews under statutory or regulatory requirements and services that generally only the auditor reasonably can provide, including issuance of comfort letter and consents for debt and equity issuances and other asset services required by statute or regulation.
The Audit related fees consist of assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the auditor such as accounting assistance and due diligence in connection with acquisitions, consulting concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, and audits of stand-alone financial statements or other assurance services not required by statute or regulation.
The Tax fees consist of professional services rendered by PwC for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice, and consulting services, including assistance and representation in connection with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to acquisitions, employee benefit plans and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.
The Other fees primarily reflect costs for training services and an accounting research software license.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee has established a policy requiring its pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The policy requires the general pre-approval of annual audit services and specific pre-approval of all other permitted services. In determining whether to pre-approve permitted services, the Audit Committee considers whether such services are consistent with SEC rules and regulations. Furthermore, requests for pre-approval for services that are eligible for general pre-approval must be detailed as to the services to be provided. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval and the fees for the
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
services performed to date. During 2020 and 2019, all audit and non-audit fees were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the policy described above and pursuant to applicable rules of the SEC.
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, professional services provided for Cleco Power that were directly billed to Cleco Holdings, were allocated to Cleco Power though not billed directly to Cleco Power. The following is Cleco Power’s allocation of professional services provided by PwC:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
Audit fees | $ | 2,331,213 | | | $ | 2,302,225 | |
Audit related fees | 13,000 | | | 608,278 | |
Tax fees | 445,500 | | | 490,200 | |
Other fees | 3,807 | | | 18,662 | |
Total | $ | 2,793,520 | | | $ | 3,419,365 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | |
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES | |
| | FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT |
| | |
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
15(a)(2) | Financial Statement Schedules | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Financial Statement Schedules other than those shown in the above index are omitted because they are either not required or are not applicable or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto | |
| | |
The Exhibits designated by an asterisk are filed herewith, except for Exhibits 32.1, 32.2, 32.3, 32.4, which are furnished herewith (and not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section). The Exhibits not so designated previously have been filed with the SEC and are incorporated herein by reference. The Exhibits designated by two asterisks are management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as Exhibits to this Report.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXHIBITS | | | | |
CLECO | SEC FILE OR REGISTRATION NUMBER | REGISTRATION STATEMENT OR REPORT | EXHIBIT NUMBER |
| 2(a) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(10/20/14) | 2.1 |
| 2(b) | | 1-15759 | 10-Q(3/18) | 2.1 |
| 2(c) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(2/8/19) | 10.6 |
| 3(a) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(4/19/16) | 3.1 |
| 3(b) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(4/19/16) | 3.2 |
| 4(a)(1) | Indenture between Cleco Power (as successor) and Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee, dated as of October 1, 1988 | 33-24896 | S-3(10/11/88) | 4(b) |
| 4(a)(2) | | 333-02895 | S-3(4/29/96) | 4(a)(2) |
| 4(a)(3) | | 333-52540 | S-3/A(1/26/01) | 4(a)(2) |
| 4(a)(4) | | 333-52540 | S-3/A(1/26/01) | 4(a)(3) |
| 4(a)(5) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(11/28/05) | 4.1 |
| 4(a)(6) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(11/12/09) | 4.1 |
| 4(a)(7) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(11/15/10) | 4.1 |
| 4(b)(1) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(5/17/16) | 4.1 |
| 4(b)(2) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(5/17/16) | 4.2 |
| 4(b)(3) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(5/17/16) | 4.3 |
| 4(b)(4) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(5/24/16) | 4.2 |
| 4(c)(1) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(9/12/19) | 4.1 |
| 4(c)(2) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(9/12/19) | 4.2 |
| 4(d) | | 1-05663 | 10-Q(9/99) | 4(c) |
** | 10(a)(1) | | 1-15759 | 10-K(2008) | 10(f)(4) |
** | 10(a)(2) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(12/9/08) | 10.3 |
** | 10(a)(3) | | 1-15759 | 10-Q(9/11) | 10.2 |
** | 10(a)(4) | | 1-15759 | 10-K(2014) | 10(c)(10) |
** | 10(a)(5) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(12/21/17) | 10.2 |
** | 10(a)(6) | | 1-15759 | 10-K(2003) | 10(e)(1)(c) |
** | 10(a)(7) | | 1-15759 | 10-K(2002) | 10(z)(1) |
** | 10(a)(8) | | 1-15759 | 10-K(2004) | 10(v)(3) |
** | 10(b)(1) | | 1-15759 | 10-Q(9/11) | 10.1 |
** | 10(b)(2) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(10/24/14) | 10.1 |
** | 10(b)(3) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(12/23/14) | 10.1 |
** | 10(b)(4) | | 1-15759 | 10-Q(6/15) | 10.1 |
** | 10(b)(5) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(3/28/17) | 10.1 |
** | 10(b)(6) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(4/27/11) | 10.1 |
** | 10(b)(7) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(12/21/17) | 10.1 |
** | 10(c)(1) | | 333-59696 | S-8(4/27/01) | 4.3 |
** | 10(c)(2) | | 1-15759 | 10-K(2008) | 10(n)(5) |
** | 10(c)(3) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(12/9/08) | 10.2 |
** | 10(c)(4) | | 1-15759 | 10-K(2003) | 10(u) |
** | 10(c)(5) | | 1-15759 | 10-Q(9/11) | 10.5 |
| 10(d)(1) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(05/09/12) | 10.1 |
| 10(d)(2) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(11/13/15) | 10.1 |
| 10(d)(3) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(12/21/16) | 10.1 |
| 10(d)(4) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(12/21/17) | 10.1 |
| 10(d)(5) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(4/19/16) | 10.1 |
| 10(d)(6) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(2/8/19) | 10.8 |
| 10(d)(7) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(5/21/20) | 10.3 |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXHIBITS | | | | |
CLECO | SEC FILE OR REGISTRATION NUMBER | REGISTRATION STATEMENT OR REPORT | EXHIBIT NUMBER |
| 10(d)(8) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(7/1/16) | 10.1 |
| 10(d)(9) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(2/8/19) | 10.7 |
| 10(d)(10) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(5/21/20) | 10.2 |
| 10(d)(11) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(2/8/19) | 10.2 |
| 10(d)(12) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(5/21/20) | 10.1 |
| 10(d)(13) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(2/8/19) | 10.3 |
| 10(d)(14) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(2/8/19) | 10.4 |
| 10(d)(15) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(2/8/19) | 10.5 |
| 10(d)(16) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(4/19/16) | 10.2 |
| 10(d)(17) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(5/21/20) | 10.4 |
| 10(d)(18) | | 1-15759 | 8-K(9/2/20) | 10.1 |
| 10(e)(1) | | 1-15759 | 10-Q(3/17) | 10.3 |
| 10(e)(2) | | 1-15759 | 10-Q(3/17) | 10.4 |
| 10(e)(3) | | 1-15759 | 10-Q(3/17) | 10.5 |
| 10(f) | | 1-15759 | 10-Q(3/20) | 10.1 |
| 10(g) | | 1-15759 | 10-Q(3/17) | 10.6 |
* | 21 | | | | |
* | 24(a) | | | | |
* | 31.1 | | | | |
* | 31.2 | | | | |
* | 32.1 | | | | |
* | 32.2 | | | | |
* | 101.INS | Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document | | | |
* | 101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | | | |
* | 101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | | | |
* | 101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | | | |
* | 101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | | | |
* | 101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase | | | |
* | 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO POWER | SEC FILE OR REGISTRATION NUMBER | REGISTRATION STATEMENT OR REPORT | EXHIBIT NUMBER |
| 3(a) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(4/19/16) | 3.3 |
| 3(b) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(4/19/16) | 3.4 |
| 4(a)(1) | Indenture between the Company and Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee, dated as of October 1, 1988 | 33-24896 | S-3(10/11/88) | 4(b) |
| 4(a)(2) | | 333-02895 | S-3(4/29/96) | 4(a)(2) |
| 4(a)(3) | | 333-52540 | S-3/A(1/26/01) | 4(a)(2) |
| 4(a)(4) | | 333-52540 | S-3/A(1/26/01) | 4(a)(3) |
| 4(a)(5) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(7/6/05) | 4.1 |
| 4(a)(6) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(11/28/05) | 4.1 |
| 4(a)(7) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(6/2/08) | 4.1 |
| 4(a)(8) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(11/12/09) | 4.1 |
| 4(a)(9) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(11/15/10) | 4.1 |
| 4(b) | | 333-71643-01 | 10-Q(9/99) | 4(c) |
| 4(c) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(11/20/07) | 4.1 |
| 4(d) | | 1-05663 | 10-Q(3/10) | 4.1 |
| 4(e) | | 1-05663 | 10-Q(3/10) | 4.2 |
** | 10(a) | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 1-05663 | 10-K(1992) | 10(o)(1) |
| 10(b)(1) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(12/19/11) | 10.1 |
| 10(b)(2) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(05/09/12) | 10.1 |
| 10(b)(3) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(11/13/15) | 10.1 |
| 10(b)(4) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(12/21/16) | 10.1 |
| 10(b)(5) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(12/21/17) | 10.1 |
| 10(b)(6) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(4/19/16) | 10.2 |
| 10(b)(7) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(5/21/20) | 10.4 |
| 10(b)(8) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(9/2/20) | 10.1 |
| 10(c)(1) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(3/6/08) | 10.1 |
| 10(c)(2) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(3/6/08) | 10.2 |
| 10(c)(3) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(3/6/08) | 10.3 |
| 10(d) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(4/19/16) | 10.4 |
** | 10(e)(1) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(3/28/17) | 10.1 |
** | 10(e)(2) | | 1-05663 | 8-K(12/21/17) | 10.1 |
| 10(f) | | 1-05663 | 10-Q(3/20) | 10.1 |
* | 24(a) | | | | |
* | 31.3 | | | | |
* | 31.4 | | | | |
* | 32.3 | | | | |
* | 32.4 | | | | |
* | 101.INS | Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document | | | |
* | 101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | | | |
* | 101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | | | |
* | 101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | | | |
* | 101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | | | |
* | 101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase | | | |
* | 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY |
None.
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
CLECO HOLDINGS (Parent Company Only) | SCHEDULE I |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Statements of Income | | | | | |
| | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating expenses | | | | | |
Administrative and general | $ | 1,497 | | | $ | 3,263 | | | $ | 1,269 | |
Merger transaction costs | 3,606 | | | 7,803 | | | 19,514 | |
| | | | | |
Other operating expense | 239 | | | 130 | | | 318 | |
Total operating expenses | 5,342 | | | 11,196 | | | 21,101 | |
Operating loss | (5,342) | | | (11,196) | | | (21,101) | |
Equity income from subsidiaries, net of tax | 173,337 | | | 205,187 | | | 149,543 | |
Interest, net | (64,362) | | | (70,252) | | | (54,635) | |
Other income (expense), net | 3,021 | | | 8,568 | | | (1,687) | |
Income before income taxes | 106,654 | | | 132,307 | | | 72,120 | |
Federal and state income tax benefit | (15,646) | | | (20,358) | | | (22,317) | |
Net income | $ | 122,300 | | | $ | 152,665 | | | $ | 94,437 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
CLECO HOLDINGS (Parent Company Only) | SCHEDULE I |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Net income | $ | 122,300 | | | $ | 152,665 | | | $ | 94,437 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | | | |
Postretirement benefits (loss) gain (net of tax benefit of $2,922, tax benefit of $6,808, and tax expense of $1,868, respectively) | (8,283) | | | (19,299) | | | 5,296 | |
| | | | | |
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (8,283) | | | (19,299) | | | 5,296 | |
Comprehensive income, net of tax | $ | 114,017 | | | $ | 133,366 | | | $ | 99,733 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
CLECO HOLDINGS (Parent Company Only) | SCHEDULE I |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Balance Sheets | | | |
| AT DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Assets | | | |
Current assets | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 21,622 | | | $ | 15,008 | |
Accounts receivable - affiliate | 75,948 | | | 14,231 | |
Other accounts receivable | 599 | | | 2,650 | |
Taxes receivable, net | 4,196 | | | 6,726 | |
Cash surrender value of trust-owned life insurance policies | 72,954 | | | 68,523 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Total current assets | 175,319 | | | 107,138 | |
Equity investment in subsidiaries | 4,181,383 | | | 4,150,953 | |
Accumulated deferred federal and state income taxes, net | 134,809 | | | 127,655 | |
Other deferred charges | 812 | | | 1,831 | |
Total assets | $ | 4,492,323 | | | $ | 4,387,577 | |
| | | |
Liabilities and member's equity | | | |
Liabilities | | | |
Current liabilities | | | |
Long-term debt due within one year | $ | 66,000 | | | $ | 63,300 | |
Accounts payable | 735 | | | 1,448 | |
| | | |
Accounts payable - affiliate | 99,822 | | | 47,184 | |
| | | |
Interest accrued | 10,158 | | | 11,005 | |
Deferred compensation | 13,240 | | | 12,115 | |
Other current liabilities | 756 | | | 274 | |
Total current liabilities | 190,711 | | | 135,326 | |
Postretirement benefit obligations | 4,453 | | | 4,481 | |
Other deferred credits | 1,813 | | | 0 | |
Long-term debt, net | 1,538,323 | | | 1,604,764 | |
Total liabilities | 1,735,300 | | | 1,744,571 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) | 0 | | 0 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Member's equity | 2,757,023 | | | 2,643,006 | |
Total liabilities and member's equity | $ | 4,492,323 | | | $ | 4,387,577 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements. | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | |
CLECO HOLDINGS (Parent Company Only) | SCHEDULE I |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows | | | | | |
| | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating activities | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 73,452 | | | $ | 189,644 | | | $ | 97,614 | |
Investing activities | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Return of equity investment in tax credit fund | 0 | | | 1,625 | | | 2,775 | |
Contribution to subsidiary | 0 | | | (962,170) | | | (1,250) | |
| | | | | |
Other investing | 0 | | | 0 | | | 442 | |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | 0 | | | (960,545) | | | 1,967 | |
Financing activities | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Draws on credit facility | 88,000 | | | 75,000 | | | 0 | |
Payments on credit facility | (88,000) | | | (75,000) | | | 0 | |
Issuance of long-term debt | 0 | | | 700,000 | | | 0 | |
Repayment of long-term debt | (64,000) | | | (370,000) | | | 0 | |
Payment of financing costs | (2,838) | | | (5,929) | | | (25) | |
| | | | | |
Contribution from member | 0 | | | 384,900 | | | 0 | |
Distributions to member | 0 | | | 0 | | | (71,350) | |
| | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (66,838) | | | 708,971 | | | (71,375) | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 6,614 | | | (61,930) | | | 28,206 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 15,008 | | | 76,938 | | | 48,732 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 21,622 | | | $ | 15,008 | | | $ | 76,938 | |
| | | | | |
Supplementary cash flow information | | | | | |
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized | $ | 62,745 | | | $ | 56,768 | | | $ | 53,798 | |
Income taxes (refunded) paid, net | $ | (2,942) | | | $ | (19) | | | $ | 2 | |
Supplementary non-cash investing and financing activity | | | | | |
Non-cash contribution to subsidiary, net of tax | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3,865 | |
| | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO HOLDINGS (Parent Company Only) Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The condensed financial statements represent the financial information required by SEC Regulation S-X 5-04 for Cleco Holdings, which requires the inclusion of parent company only financial statements if the restricted net assets of consolidated subsidiaries exceed 25% of total consolidated net assets as of the last day of its most recent fiscal year. As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Holdings’ restricted net assets of consolidated subsidiaries were $1.51 billion and exceeded 25% of its total consolidated net assets.
Cleco Holdings’ major, first-tier subsidiaries are Cleco Power and Cleco Cajun. Cleco Power contains the LPSC-jurisdictional generation, transmission, and distribution electric utility operations serving its retail and wholesale customers. Upon completion of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, Cleco Cajun became a major, first tier subsidiary. Cleco Cajun is an unregulated electric utility company that owns generation and transmission assets and supplies wholesale power and capacity to its customers. For more information about the Cleco Cajun Transaction, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 3 — Business Combinations.”
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared to present the results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows of Cleco Holdings on a stand-alone basis as a holding company. Investments in subsidiaries and other investees are presented using the equity method. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Cleco’s consolidated financial statements.
At December 31, 2020, and 2019 Cleco Holdings had 0 short-term debt outstanding.
At December 31, 2020, Cleco Holding’s long-term debt outstanding was $1.60 billion, of which $66.0 million was due within one year. The amount due within one year represents principal payments on Cleco Holdings’ debt as required by the Cleco Cajun Transaction commitments to the LPSC.
On September 11, 2019, Cleco Holdings completed the private placement of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.375% senior notes due September 15, 2029. The proceeds from the issuance were used to repay the remaining amounts due under the $300.0 million bridge loan agreement and a portion of the $100.0 million term loan agreement, both entered into in connection with the Cleco Cajun Transaction. On July 14, 2020, Cleco Holdings completed an exchange offer for its outstanding 3.375% senior notes, which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for an equal principal amount of newly issued 3.375% senior notes due September 15, 2029, that were so registered. Cleco Holdings did not receive any proceeds from the exchange offer.
Upon approval of the Cleco Cajun Transaction, commitments were made to the LPSC by Cleco Holdings, including repayment of $400.0 million of Cleco Holdings’ debt by December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2020, Cleco Holdings was in compliance with these commitments. The cumulative minimum principal amounts committed to be repaid for each year through 2024 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | | |
For the year ending Dec. 31, | | |
2019 | | $ | 66,700 | |
2020 | | $ | 133,300 | |
2021 | | $ | 200,000 | |
2022 | | $ | 267,700 | |
2023 | | $ | 333,300 | |
2024 | | $ | 400,000 | |
|
The principal amounts payable under long-term debt agreements for each year through 2025 and thereafter are as follows:
| | | | | |
AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER LONG-TERM DEBT ARRANGEMENTS | (THOUSANDS) |
For the year ending Dec. 31, | |
2021 | $ | 0 | |
2022 | $ | 266,000 | |
2023 | $ | 165,000 | |
2024 | $ | 0 | |
2025 | $ | 0 | |
Thereafter | $ | 1,185,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 3 — Cash Distributions and Equity Contributions |
Some provisions in Cleco Power’s debt instruments restrict the amount of equity available for distribution to Cleco Holdings by Cleco Power by requiring Cleco Power’s total indebtedness to be less than or equal to 65% of total capitalization. In addition, the 2016 Merger Commitments provide for limitations on the amount of distributions that may be paid from Cleco Power to Cleco Holdings, depending on Cleco Power’s common equity ratio and its corporate credit ratings.
The following table summarizes the cash distributions Cleco Holdings received from affiliates during 2020, 2019, and 2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Cleco Power | $ | 0 | | | $ | 20,000 | | | $ | 121,400 | |
Cleco Cajun | 134,000 | | | 205,000 | | | 0 | |
Perryville | 0 | | | 0 | | | 225 | |
Attala | 0 | | | 0 | | | 217 | |
Total | $ | 134,000 | | | $ | 225,000 | | | $ | 121,842 | |
During the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco Holdings made 0 non-cash equity contributions to affiliates. During the year ended December 31, 2018, Cleco Holdings made $1.8 million and $2.1 million in non-cash equity contributions to Perryville and Attala, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, Cleco Holdings made 0 cash contributions to affiliates. During the year ended December 31, 2019, Cleco Holdings made $962.2 million of contributions to Cleco Cajun to finance the Cleco Cajun Transaction. During the year ended December 31, 2018, Cleco Holdings made $1.3 million of contributions to Cleco Cajun.
During the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2018, Cleco Holdings received 0 equity contributions from Cleco
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Group. During the year ended December 31, 2019, Cleco Holdings received $384.9 million equity contributions from Cleco Group.
During the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, Cleco Holdings made 0 distribution payments to Cleco Group. During the year ended December 31, 2018, Cleco Holdings made $71.4 million of distribution payments to Cleco Group.
Cleco Holdings’ (Parent Company Only) Condensed Statements of Income reflect income tax expense (benefit) for the following line items: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, |
(THOUSANDS) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Federal and state income tax benefit | $ | (15,646) | | | $ | (20,358) | | | $ | (22,317) | |
Equity income from subsidiaries - federal and state income tax expense | $ | 51,364 | | | $ | 63,523 | | | $ | 51,699 | |
For information regarding the TCJA, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 11 — Income Taxes — TCJA.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 5 — Commitments and Contingencies |
For information regarding commitments and contingencies related to Cleco Holdings, see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to the Financial Statements — Note 15 — Litigation, Other Commitments and Contingencies, and Disclosures about Guarantees.”
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | | | | SCHEDULE II |
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | ADDITIONS | | DEDUCTIONS | | BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD (1) |
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 3,005 | | | $ | 6,176 | | | $ | 6,423 | | | $ | 2,758 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 814 | | | $ | 2,323 | | | $ | 132 | | | $ | 3,005 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | 1,457 | | | $ | 977 | | | $ | 1,620 | | | $ | 814 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(1) Deducted in the consolidated balance sheet | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | ADDITIONS | | DEDUCTIONS | | BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD(1) |
Unrestricted Storm Reserve | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 1,100 | | | $ | 12,329 | | | $ | 13,429 | | | $ | 0 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 3,672 | | | $ | 4,000 | | | $ | 6,572 | | | $ | 1,100 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | 4,186 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 514 | | | $ | 3,672 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Restricted Storm Reserve | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 12,285 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 12,329 | | | $ | 0 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 15,485 | | | $ | 800 | | | $ | 4,000 | | | $ | 12,285 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | 14,469 | | | $ | 1,016 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 15,485 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(1) Included in the consolidated balance sheet | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CLECO POWER | | | | | SCHEDULE II |
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | ADDITIONS | | DEDUCTIONS | | BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD (1) |
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts | | | | | | | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 3,005 | | | $ | 6,176 | | | $ | 6,423 | | | $ | 2,758 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 814 | | | $ | 2,323 | | | $ | 132 | | | $ | 3,005 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | 1,457 | | | $ | 977 | | | $ | 1,620 | | | $ | 814 | |
(1) Deducted in the consolidated balance sheet | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(THOUSANDS) | BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | ADDITIONS | | DEDUCTIONS | | BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD(1) |
Unrestricted Storm Reserve | | | | | | | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 1,100 | | | $ | 12,329 | | | $ | 13,429 | | | $ | 0 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 3,672 | | | $ | 4,000 | | | $ | 6,572 | | | $ | 1,100 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | 4,186 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 514 | | | $ | 3,672 | |
Restricted Storm Reserve | | | | | | | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2020 | $ | 12,285 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 12,329 | | | $ | 0 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019 | $ | 15,485 | | | $ | 800 | | | $ | 4,000 | | | $ | 12,285 | |
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018 | $ | 14,469 | | | $ | 1,016 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 15,485 | |
(1) Included in the consolidated balance sheet | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | |
| | CLECO CORPORATE HOLDINGS LLC |
| | (Registrant) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ William G. Fontenot |
| | (William G. Fontenot) |
| | (President & Chief Executive Officer) |
Date: March 3, 2021
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
SIGNATURE | | TITLE | DATE |
| | | |
/s/ William G. Fontenot | | President & Chief Executive Officer | March 3, 2021 |
(William G. Fontenot) | | (Principal Executive Officer) | |
/s/ Kazi K. Hasan | | Chief Financial Officer | March 3, 2021 |
(Kazi K. Hasan) | | (Principal Financial Officer) | |
/s/ Tonita Laprarie | | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer | March 3, 2021 |
(Tonita Laprarie) | | (Principal Accounting Officer) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| MANAGERS* | |
| Andrew M. Chapman | |
| Paraskevas Fronimos | |
| Richard J. Gallot, Jr. | |
| David R. Gilchrist | |
| Gerald C. Hanrahan, Jr. | |
| Christopher J. Leslie | |
| Jon R. R. Perry | |
| Aaron J. Rubin | |
| Peggy B. Scott | |
| Steven J. Turner | |
| Bruce D. Wainer | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*By: | /s/ William G. Fontenot | | | March 3, 2021 |
| (William G. Fontenot, as Attorney-in-Fact) | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CLECO | | |
CLECO POWER | | 2020 FORM 10-K |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | |
| | CLECO POWER LLC |
| | (Registrant) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ William G. Fontenot |
| | (William G. Fontenot) |
| | (Chief Executive Officer) |
Date: March 3, 2021
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
SIGNATURE | | TITLE | DATE |
| | | |
/s/ William G. Fontenot | | Chief Executive Officer | March 3, 2021 |
(William G. Fontenot) | | (Principal Executive Officer) | |
/s/ Kazi K. Hasan | | Chief Financial Officer | March 3, 2021 |
(Kazi K. Hasan) | | (Principal Financial Officer) | |
/s/ Tonita Laprarie | | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer | March 3, 2021 |
(Tonita Laprarie) | | (Principal Accounting Officer) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| MANAGERS* | |
| Andrew M. Chapman | |
| Paraskevas Fronimos | |
| Richard J. Gallot, Jr. | |
| David R. Gilchrist | |
| Gerald C. Hanrahan, Jr. | |
| Christopher J. Leslie | |
| Jon R. R. Perry | |
| Aaron J. Rubin | |
| Peggy B. Scott | |
| Melissa Stark | |
| Steven J. Turner | |
| Bruce D. Wainer | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*By: | /s/ William G. Fontenot | | | March 3, 2021 |
| (William G. Fontenot, as Attorney-in-Fact) | | | |