consisting of an increase in dollar commitments from $45 million to $140 million and of multicurrency commitments from $100 million to $110 million. In connection with such increase, the Company paid the lenders providing commitments certain fees.
On January 17, 2024, the Company signed an Incremental Agreement, which supplements the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2022 (as amended, restated, supplemented and otherwise modified to date, including by the Credit Agreement), among the Company, as borrower, ING, as administrative agent and the Lenders Party Thereto. Pursuant to the Incremental Agreement, among other changes, the total commitments under the Credit Agreement increased from $250 million to $255 million.
Under Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act, prior to March 23, 2018, a BDC was generally not permitted to issue senior securities unless after giving effect thereto the BDC met a coverage ratio of total assets, less liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to total senior securities, which includes all borrowings of the BDC, of at least 200%. On March 23, 2018, the Small Business Credit Availability Act (“SBCAA”) was signed into law, which among other things, amended Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act to add a new Section 61(a)(2) that reduces the asset coverage requirement applicable to BDCs from 200% to 150% so long as the BDC meets certain disclosure requirements and obtains certain approvals. The reduced asset coverage requirement would permit a BDC to have a ratio of total outstanding indebtedness to net assets of 2:1 as compared to a maximum of 1:1 under the 200% asset coverage requirement. The Company’s sole initial shareholder approved the application of the modified asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act to the Company. As a result, under current law, the Company is permitted as a BDC to issue senior securities in amounts such that the Company’s asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 150% of gross assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, after each issuance of senior securities (a two-to-one debt-to-equity ratio). As of March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Company’s asset coverage ratio were 249.2% and 243.9%, respectively.
Net cash provided by / (used in) operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, were $10.0 million and ($60.0) million, respectively, consisting primarily of the settlement of acquisitions of investments (net of dispositions) of $2.5 million and ($36.5) million, respectively, and net investment income (net of non-cash income and expenses) of approximately $9.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively.
Net cash provided by / (used in) financing activities was ($9.3) million and $59.0 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, consisting primarily of zero and $34.8 million, respectively, from the issuance of common shares, $1.5 million and $29.2 million, respectively, from net amounts drawn on the Credit Agreement and $10.8 million and $5.0 million, respectively, from distributions paid.
At March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, we had $1.6 million and $0.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, respectively, and zero and $0.2 million in restricted cash, respectively.
Contractual Obligations
As of the date hereof, the Company does not have any other significant contractual payment obligations. However, the Company has entered into certain contracts under which the Company will have material future commitments.
The Company has entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser in accordance with the 1940 Act upon the Company’s election to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Adviser will provide the Company with investment advisory and management services. For these services, the Company will pay (1) a management fee equal to a percentage of the value of the Company’s Weighted Average Net Asset Value and (2) an incentive fee based on the Company’s performance.
The Company has entered into the Administration Agreement with the Administrator upon the Company’s election to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. Under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator will perform, or oversee the performance of, the Company’s required administrative services. Payments under the Administration Agreement will be based upon the Company’s allocable portion of the overhead and other expenses incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including the fees of the Sub-Administrator, rent, technology systems (including subscription fees and other costs and expenses related to Bloomberg Professional Services and the Adviser’s third-party Order Management System), insurance and the Company’s allocable portion of the cost of compensation and related expenses of its Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Financial Officer and their respective staffs. The Administrator has entered into a sub-administration agreement with the Sub-Administrator, pursuant to which the Administrator will delegate certain administrative functions to the Sub-Administrator.
If any of the Company’s contractual obligations discussed above are terminated, the costs under any new agreements may increase. In addition, the Company will likely incur significant time and expense in locating alternative parties to provide the services that the Company expects to receive under the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement. Any new investment advisory agreement would also be subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders.