(b) Not applicable.
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer. The registrant has not made any substantive amendments to its code of ethics during the period covered by this report. The registrant has not granted any waivers from any provisions of the code of ethics during the period covered by this report.
The registrant undertakes to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of its code of ethics by contacting Investor Relations at (855) 777-8001 or by writing to Secretary, Oaktree Diversified Income Fund Inc., Brookfield Place, 250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor, New York, NY 10281-1023.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The registrant’s Board of Directors has determined that there is at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee. Stuart A. McFarland, Edward A. Kuczmarski, William H. Wright II and Heather S. Goldman each qualify as “audit committee financial experts” and are considered to be “independent” as each term is defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The registrant has engaged its principal accountant to perform audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services during the past two fiscal years. “Audit services” refer to performing an audit of the registrant's annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. “Audit-related services” refer to the assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit. “Tax services” refer to professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. The following table details the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed for each of the last two fiscal years for audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and other fees by the principal accountant.
| | FYE 12/31/2023 | | | FYE 12/31/2022 | |
( a ) Audit Fees | | $ | 209,940 | | | $ | 178,000 | |
( b ) Audit-Related Fees | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
( c ) Tax Fees | | $ | 11,330 | | | $ | 10,300 | |
( d ) All Other Fees | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
(e)(1) The audit committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures that require the audit committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services of the registrant, including services provided to any entity affiliated with the registrant.
(e)(2) The percentage of fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) applicable to non-audit services pursuant to waiver of pre-approval requirement were as follows:
| | FYE 12/31/2023 | | | FYE 12/31/2022 | |
Audit-Related Fees | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % |
Tax Fees | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % |
All Other Fees | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % |
(f) All of the principal accountant’s hours spent on auditing the registrant’s financial statements were attributed to work performed by full-time permanent employees of the principal accountant.
(g) The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, for non-audit services rendered to the registrant and the registrant’s investment adviser and administrator were $11,330 and $10,300, respectively. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, these amounts reflect the amounts disclosed above in (b), (c) and (d), plus $0 and $0, respectively, in fees billed to the registrant’s investment adviser for non-audit services that did not relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant.
(h) The audit committee of the Board of Directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant's investment adviser is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence and has concluded that the provision of such non-audit services by the accountant has not compromised the accountant’s independence.
(i) Not applicable
(j) Not applicable
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
(a) The registrant is an issuer as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (the “Act”) and has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Act. The independent members of the committee are as follows: Stuart A. McFarland, Edward A. Kuczmarski, Heather S. Goldman and William H. Wright II. As of January 1, 2024, Betty Whelchel joined the Board of Directors as an Independent Director and is an Independent Member of the Audit Committee.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
| (a) | Schedule of Investments is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form. |
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Clients often grant Oaktree Fund Advisors, LLC (“Oaktree”) the authority to vote proxies on their behalf. Proxy statements increasingly contain controversial issues involving shareholder rights and corporate governance, among others, which deserve careful review and consideration. Oaktree has adopted and implemented policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interest of investors and clients, in accordance with our fiduciary duties and SEC Rule 206(4)6 under the Advisers Act. Our authority to vote the proxies of our clients is established by the investment management agreements or similar documents.
Oaktree maintains written proxy voting guidelines, which are amended as necessary. The proxy voting guidelines address a broad range of issues, including the selection of directors, executive compensation, proxy contests and tender offer defenses. We generally vote in the manner as noted within the guidelines, unless a different vote is deemed prudent under the specific circumstances, taking into consideration the contractual obligations under any investment management agreement, or other comparable document, and all other relevant facts and circumstances at the time of the vote. It is our policy to perform a detailed review of each proxy statement when considering the voting recommendations of the guidelines.
1. Delegation of Voting Responsibility and Account Set Up
It is the responsibility of the Legal personnel who prepares or reviews an investment management agreement, or other comparable document, to ensure that such agreement, prior to, or at the time of execution, assigns responsibility of voting proxies, whether it be retained by the client or delegated to Oaktree.
There may be certain instances in which Oaktree’s authority to vote proxies may be limited and as such the proxy voting guidelines may not be followed or a vote may not be placed. Such occasions may include, but are not limited to, when (i) the client has mandated that Oaktree vote in accordance with their proxy voting guidelines; or (ii) the client has chosen to participate in a securities lending program that may result in voting authority being lost if a particular security is out on loan on the record date. In the case where a Managed Account client has requested that Oaktree vote proxies in accordance with their guidelines, the Legal personnel reviewing the investment management agreement shall ensure that such guidelines are received from the client prior to funding of the account. Additionally, Oaktree may in its discretion, under certain limited facts and circumstances, abstain from voting proxies on behalf of its clients. Such facts and circumstances are documented and maintained as evidence for abstaining from the proxy vote.
Upon receipt of an investment management agreement, or other comparable document, the Compliance department sends the appropriate proxy voting provisions to the Corporate Actions department. The Corporate Actions department is responsible for preparing the Proxy Account Guidelines Matrix which details the voting responsibility for each Managed Account/Managed Fund and any other relevant details. The Corporate Actions department ensures that, for those Managed Accounts/Managed Funds for which Oaktree has been delegated voting authority, contact is made with the appropriate custodian bank and/or benefit plan trustee in order to receive proxy statements.
2. Voting Procedures
Determination of Vote
Proxies are generally considered by the investment professional responsible for monitoring the security being voted. The Corporate Actions personnel responsible for proxies (with the exception of the Emerging Markets Equities strategy, which handles the proxies relating to their investments) deliver to such investment professional the proxy statement, the proxy voting guidelines and the Proxy Voting Form. The Proxy Voting Form serve as Oaktree’s record of the following information:
| (i) | whether the investment was held as a passive investment or considered a significant holding; |
| (ii) | whether any material conflict of interest existed in connection with the vote (see further discussion below for description of the procedures to be followed in the instance of such occurrence); |
| (iii) | documentation of the vote for each proposal, including any additional document created or utilized, if any, that was material to arriving at such a determination; and |
| (iv) | documentation of the basis and rationale of the vote when the proxy voting guidelines were not followed, including the reasons why such guidelines were not used. |
Once the investment professional has completed his or her analysis, documented the vote, the basis for such vote and signed the form, it should be forwarded to designated Compliance personnel for review. Such personnel ensure that all required documentation has been included, the vote is in accordance with the proxy voting guidelines, or if not, documentation supporting such exception has been created. The information is then sent to Compliance personnel for a final review, which is evidenced in the proxy documentation.
Corporate Actions personnel (with the exception of the Emerging Markets Equities investment strategy, which handles the proxies relating to their investments) then takes the recommended vote from the Proxy Voting Form and submit/transmit such vote(s) online unless the securities are held in physical form. If they are held in physical form, the custodian banks will provide the physical proxy ballots to Oaktree for approval and election. Oaktree will then forward the completed proxy ballots to the agent by mail in a timely manner. Copies of all such documents must be maintained to evidence submission of each proxy vote (see discussion under record- keeping below for additional guidance).
The Emerging Markets Equities investment strategy follows a similar process in which proxies are processed by the relevant Operations personnel and forwarded to the investment professional for consideration. Once the investment professional has completed his or her analysis, documented the vote, the rationale for such vote, and completed the Proxy Voting Form and received approval as necessary, the documentation is forwarded to designated Compliance personnel for review and approval. Once approval is received, the relevant Operations personnel then takes the recommended vote from the approved Proxy Voting Form and submit/transmit such vote(s) online.
Oaktree endeavors, on a best efforts basis, to vote all proxies for which it has proxy voting authority in accordance with the applicable deadlines. Nevertheless, from time to time, proxies may not be voted or are not voted in a timely manner due to various factors, for example receiving proxy notices late or after the cut-off time for voting, not receiving sufficient information regarding proxy matters or certain custodian policies and restrictions.
Conflicts of Interest
Occasions may arise where a person or organization involved in the proxy voting process may have a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest may exist, for example if Oaktree has a business relationship with (or is actively soliciting business from) either the company soliciting the proxy, a third party that has a material interest in the outcome of a proxy vote or that is actively lobbying for a particular outcome of a proxy vote. Any person with knowledge of a personal conflict of interest (e.g. familial relationship with company management) regarding a particular proxy vote must notify Legal or Compliance personnel.
Appropriate members of the Legal and/or Compliance department review such circumstances to determine if a material conflict exists and address any such conflict by: (i) identifying the potential material conflict of interest on the proxy voting form; and (ii) implementing appropriate procedures to address such material conflict of interest. Such procedures may include, but not limited to: (i) having the investment professional remove him or herself from the voting process to be replaced with another research analyst not directly involved; (ii) disclose the conflict to the client and obtain their consent prior to voting; or (iii) a determination that the conflict is not material as neither Oaktree nor Managed Accounts/Managed Funds owns more than 5% of the outstanding class of securities subject to the vote.
3. Tracking Procedures
The Corporate Actions or Trade Support/Operations personnel in each investment strategy in charge of proxies have been delegated the responsibility of communicating with each Managed Account/Managed Fund” custodian bank, prime broker and/or benefit plan trustee to ensure that all proxies are received and for the correct amount of holdings. In addition, such personnel are responsible for ensuring that proxies are responded to in a timely manner and for transmitting appropriate voting instructions to the correct party. Information is documented on a Proxy Tracking Form as follows:
| (i) | Matching proxies received with stock holdings on the record date as indicated on the proxy card to internal holding reports; |
| (ii) | Documenting reasons as to why proxies were not received for any stock holdings; and |
| (iii) | Recording the dates on which votes were submitted for each Managed Account/Managed Fund. |
In addition to the above, Compliance personnel confirms whether the shares subject to the proxy are held by more than one investment strategy. If the position is cross-held, Compliance personnel may instruct coordination of the vote between the various investment strategies where the combined position is material (more than 5% of the outstanding class of securities subject to the vote). The ultimate decision to coordinate voting requires an evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances with the relevant portfolio managers and Legal personnel.
4. Disclosure to Clients
Oaktree clients that request additional information regarding our proxy voting policies and procedures, or details on how we have voted specific proxies, can forward their written requests to the attention of the Chief Compliance Officer at Oaktree Capital Management, L.P., 333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California, 90071, or via facsimile at (213) 8306296. Disclosure of this option to clients is made through our Form ADV Part 2A. It is Oaktree’s policy not to release proxy voting information to third parties.
In the event a request is received, the Compliance department will forward such requests from clients to the appropriate Corporate Actions personnel or Trade Support/Operations personnel in charge of proxies to facilitate and maintain the requested information.
5. Recordkeeping
Documentation that Oaktree has voted all proxies for Managed Accounts/Managed Funds for which it has proxy voting authority is maintained by the Corporate Actions or Trade Support/Operations personnel responsible for proxies. Such documentation includes for each proxy voted:
| (ii) | Proxy Voting Form indicating voting response, the basis and rationale for such vote, and any documentation or materials used in determining the vote; |
| (iii) | Proxy Tracking Form indicating Managed Accounts/Managed Funds’ names, shares owned on record date, date voted, method of voting; and if Oaktree did not vote for a particular Managed Account/Managed Fund the reasons behind such action; and |
| (iv) | List of client requests for proxy voting information. |
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Investment Team – Portfolio Managers
Portfolio Managers
Bruce Karsh, Wayne Dahl, Armen Panossian, Danielle Poli, and David Rosenberg manage the Fund. Bruce Karsh is the lead portfolio manager for the Fund. Their professional backgrounds are below.
Bruce Karsh
Co-Founder, Chief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager
Mr. Karsh is Oaktree’s Co-Chairman and one of the firm’s co-founders. He also is Chief Investment Officer and serves as portfolio manager for Oaktree’s Opportunities, Value Opportunities and Global Credit strategies, including the Oaktree Diversified Income Fund. Prior to co-founding Oaktree, Mr. Karsh was a managing director of TCW Asset Management Company, and the portfolio manager of the Special Credits Funds from 1988 until 1995. Prior to joining TCW, Mr. Karsh worked as Assistant to the Chairman of SunAmerica, Inc. Prior to that, he was an attorney with the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers. Before working at O’Melveny & Myers, Mr. Karsh clerked for the Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy, then of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and retired Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Karsh holds an A.B. degree in economics summa cum laude from Duke University, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. He went on to earn a J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law, where he served as Notes Editor of the Virginia Law Review and was a member of the Order of the Coif. Mr. Karsh serves on the boards of a number of privately held companies. He is a member of the investment committee of the Broad Foundations. Mr. Karsh is Trustee Emeritus of Duke University, having served as Trustee from 2003 to 2015, and as Chairman of the Board of DUMAC, LLC, the entity that managed Duke’s endowment, from 2005 to 2014.
Wayne Dahl
Managing Director and Co-Portfolio Manager
Mr. Dahl serves as a portfolio manager within our Global Credit and Investment Grade Solutions strategies and is a founding member of the Global Credit Investment Committee. Mr. Dahl joined Oaktree in 2016 from Prosiris Capital Management in New York, where he was the Chief Risk Officer. Prior thereto, Mr. Dahl was Head of Risk Management for Canyon Capital Advisors in Los Angeles for nine years where he developed, implemented and managed the firm’s risk measurement and reporting systems across all investment strategies. Mr. Dahl began his career at Rumson Capital in quantitative research and development focused on the convertible arbitrage strategy. He received his B.A. degree in economics with a minor in mathematics from Brigham Young University and his Master of Science in Mathematics in Finance degree from New York University’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Science.
Armen Panossian
Co-Chief Executive Officer, Head of Performing Credit and Co-Portfolio Manager
Mr. Panossian serves as co-Chief Executive Officer, primarily focused on overseeing the organization and performance of Oaktree’s investment teams. He is also Head of Performing Credit, where his responsibilities include oversight of the firm’s liquid and private credit strategies and as a portfolio manager within the Global Private Debt and Global Credit strategies. Mr. Panossian joined Oaktree’s Global Opportunities group in 2007. In January 2014, he joined the U.S. Senior Loans team to assume co-portfolio management responsibilities and lead the development of Oaktree’s CLO business. He became head of all performing credit in 2019. Mr. Panossian joined Oaktree from Pequot Capital Management, where he worked on their distressed debt strategy. Mr. Panossian holds a B.A. degree in economics with honors and distinction from Stanford University, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa; an M.S. degree in health services research from Stanford Medical School; a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School; and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Mr. Panossian serves on the Advisory Board of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. He is a member of the State Bar of California.
David Rosenberg
Managing Director and Co-Portfolio Manager
Mr. Rosenberg serves as a co-portfolio manager of Oaktree’s U.S. High Yield Bond, Global High Yield Bond and Investment Grade Solutions strategies. He also serves as a co-portfolio manager of the Global Credit strategy and is a founding member of its Investment Committee. Mr. Rosenberg joined Oaktree in 2004 following graduation from the University of Southern California with an M.B.A. in business administration. Before attending graduate school, he served as an associate in the Franchise Systems Finance Group at J.P. Morgan. Mr. Rosenberg also holds an M.P.A. in professional accounting with a concentration in finance and a B.A. degree in business administration from the University of Texas at Austin. He is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive).
Danielle Poli
Managing Director and Co-Portfolio Manager
Ms. Poli is a managing director and portfolio manager within Oaktree’s Global Credit strategy. She is a founding member of the strategy, having helped design its portfolio management processes and having served as a member of the Global Credit Investment Committee since 2017. Ms. Poli has led the expansion of the firm’s multi-asset credit offerings, including a product for Brookfield Oaktree Wealth Solutions which she has co-managed since 2021. In addition, Ms. Poli oversaw Oaktree’s product management activities globally across Credit, Private Equity, Real Assets and Listed Equities from 2019 to 2023. Prior to joining Oaktree in 2014, Ms. Poli earned her M.B.A. at the UCLA Anderson School of Management, where she received the Laurence and Lori Fink Investment Management Fellowship. Prior thereto, she worked at PAAMCO KKR Prisma (formerly PAAMCO) where Ms. Poli helped manage hedge fund portfolios for institutional clients. Ms. Poli holds a B.S. degree in business administration from the University of Southern California and is a CAIA charterholder.
Management of Other Accounts
The table below identifies the number of accounts (other than the Fund) for which the Fund’s portfolio managers have day-to-day management responsibilities and the total assets in such accounts, within each of the following categories: registered investment companies, other pooled investment vehicles, and other accounts. For each category, the number of accounts and total assets in the accounts where fees are based on performance is also indicated as of December 31, 2023.
Portfolio Manager | | Number of Registered Investment Companies Managed and Total Assets for such Accounts* | | Beneficial Ownership of Equity Securities in Funds Managed by each Portfolio Manager | | Number of Other Pooled Investment Vehicles Managed and Total Assets for such Accounts* | | Number of Other Accounts Managed and Total Assets for such Accounts*, ** |
Bruce Karsh | | - | | - | | 14 / $45,326 | | 27 / $9,390 |
Wayne Dahl | | - | | - | | - | | - |
Armen Panossian | | - | | - | | 10 / $13,516 | | 38 / $23,264 |
Danielle Poli | | - | | - | | - | | - |
David Rosenberg | | 1 / $27 | | - | | 8 / $4,905 | | 58 / $19,650 |
* Assets in $ millions
** Represents separate accounts.
Share Ownership
The following table indicates the dollar range of securities of the Registrant owned by the Registrant’s portfolio managers as of December 31, 2023.
| | Dollar Range of Securities Owned |
Bruce Karsh | | None |
Wayne Dahl | | None |
Armen Panossian | | None |
Danielle Poli | | None |
David Rosenberg | | None |
Potential Conflicts of Interest
In the course of providing investment management services, Oaktree and all principals, partners, officers, employees of Oaktree, as well as certain consultants and other external service providers, and its affiliates (collectively, “Oaktree Representatives”), likely will come into possession of material, nonpublic information which, if disclosed, might affect an investor’s decision to buy, sell or hold a security. Under applicable law, Oaktree and Oaktree Representatives may be prohibited from improperly disclosing or using such information for their personal benefit or for the benefit of any other person, including the Fund. In addition, certain accounts have acquired, and may in the future acquire, interests in companies that provide services to one or more other accounts. The payment of fees by accounts to a service provider owned in whole or in part by other accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest to the extent Oaktree directed or initiated such transaction. If Oaktree believes such instances may give rise to a conflict of interest, Oaktree will address such conflicts based on the facts and circumstances presented by each situation and attempt to employ measures to ensure that the accounts using the company’s services are charged arm’s-length prices for the services they receive. Such measures may include, where appropriate, having the company’s management control the negotiation of fees with the accounts to which services are provided and/or obtaining a “most favored nations” clause so that the accounts will automatically receive the benefit of the most favorable fees charged by the service provider to similarly situated clients. Oaktree and its employees may also receive certain benefits, such as discounts on products or services from companies in which an Oaktree account holds a significant ownership interest.
Conflicts Relating to Brookfield Asset Management. In 2019, Brookfield acquired a majority interest in Oaktree. Oaktree is a wholly owned subsidiary of Brookfield. Together, Brookfield and Oaktree provide investors with one of the most comprehensive offerings of alternative investment products available today. While partnering to leverage one another’s strengths, Oaktree operates as an independent business within the Brookfield family, with its own product offerings and investment, marketing, and support teams. Brookfield and Oaktree have continued to operate their respective investment businesses largely independently, with each remaining under its own brand and led by its own management and investment teams. Brookfield and Oaktree manage their investment team independently of each other pursuant to an information barrier. Oaktree accounts and their portfolio companies sometimes engage in activities and have business relationships that give rise to conflicts (and potential conflicts) of interest between them, on the one hand, and, Brookfield and Brookfield’s clients (together, “Brookfield Accounts”) and their portfolio companies on the other hand. For so long as Brookfield and Oaktree manage their investment teams independently of each other pursuant to an information barrier, Oaktree,
Oaktree accounts and their respective portfolio companies generally will not be treated as affiliates of Brookfield, Brookfield Accounts and their portfolio companies, and conflicts (and potential conflicts) considerations, including in connection with allocation of investment opportunities, investment and trading activities, and agreements, transactions and other arrangements entered into with Oaktree, Oaktree accounts and their portfolio companies, generally will be managed in accordance with disclosures set out in the governing documents and independently.
There is (and in the future will continue to be) overlap in investment strategies and investments pursued by Oaktree and Brookfield. Nevertheless, Oaktree generally does not coordinate or consult with Brookfield with respect to investment decisions of Oaktree accounts. While this absence of coordination and consultation, and the information barrier described above, in some respects serves to mitigate conflicts of interests between Oaktree and Brookfield, these same factors also give rise to certain conflicts and risks in connection with Brookfield’s and Oaktree’s investment activities, and make it more difficult to mitigate, ameliorate or avoid such situations. For example, because neither Brookfield nor Oaktree generally coordinate or consult with the other about investment activities and/or decisions made by the other, and neither Brookfield nor Oaktree is subject to any internal approvals over its respective investment activities and decisions by any person who would have knowledge and/or decision-making control of the investment decisions of the other, Brookfield will pursue investment opportunities for Brookfield Accounts which would also be suitable for Oaktree accounts, but which are not made available to such Oaktree accounts. Brookfield Accounts and Oaktree accounts compete, from time to time, for the same investment opportunities. Such competition could, under certain circumstances, adversely impact the purchase price of investments. Brookfield has no obligation to, and generally will not, share investment opportunities that would also be suitable for the Oaktree accounts, and Oaktree and Oaktree accounts have no rights with respect to any such opportunities.
In addition, Brookfield is not restricted from forming or establishing new Brookfield Accounts, such as additional funds or successor funds, which directly compete with Oaktree accounts for investment opportunities. Brookfield Accounts also are not restricted from pursuing investment opportunities based in whole or in part on information, support and knowledge provided directly or indirectly by Oaktree. For example, Oaktree may provide Brookfield, from time to time, with access to marketing-related support, including, for example, introductions to investor relationships and other marketing facilitation activities. Such Brookfield Accounts could compete with or otherwise conduct their affairs without regard to any adverse impact on Oaktree accounts. In addition, Brookfield Accounts are permitted to make investments suitable for Oaktree accounts without the consent of the Oaktree accounts or Oaktree. From time to time, Brookfield Accounts and Oaktree accounts may purchase or sell an investment from or to each other, as well as jointly pursue investments.
In addition, from time to time, Brookfield Accounts hold interests in investments held by Oaktree accounts (or potential Oaktree account investments) and/or subsequently purchase (or sell) an interest in an investment held by Oaktree accounts (or potential Oaktree account investments). In such situations, Brookfield Accounts could benefit from Oaktree accounts’ activities. Conversely, Oaktree accounts could be adversely impacted by Brookfield’s activities. In addition, as a result of different investment objectives, views and/or interests in investments, Brookfield may manage certain Brookfield Accounts’ investments in particular issuers in a way that is different from Oaktree accounts’ investments in the same issuers (including, for example, by investing in different portions of the issuer’s capital structure, short selling securities, voting securities or exercising rights it holds in a different manner and/or buying or selling its interests at different times than the Oaktree accounts), which could adversely impact Oaktree accounts’ interests. Brookfield and its affiliates may take positions, give advice and provide recommendations that are different from, and potentially contrary to, those which are taken by, given or provided to Oaktree accounts, and are expected to hold interests that potentially are adverse to those held by Oaktree accounts. Brookfield has no obligation or duty to make available for the benefit of Oaktree accounts any information regarding its activities, strategies and/or views.
Brookfield and Oaktree are likely to be deemed to be affiliates of each other for purposes of certain laws and regulations, notwithstanding their operational independence and the existence of an information barrier between them, and from time to time Brookfield Accounts and Oaktree accounts will have positions (which in some cases will be significant) in the same issuers. In those cases Brookfield and Oaktree will frequently need to aggregate their investment holdings, including holdings of Brookfield Accounts and Oaktree accounts, for certain securities law purposes (including trading restrictions under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, reporting obligations under Section 13 of the Exchange Act and reporting and short-swing.
Portfolio Manager Compensation
The compensation structure of the Portfolio Managers is determined by Oaktree in accordance with its own internal policies. All other Portfolio Managers receive a salary that is capped so that a significant portion of their compensation is derived from their bonus, which is a function of Oaktree’s profitability and the Portfolio Manager’s responsibilities and performance, and equity participation as one of the most senior employees. No Portfolio Manager’s compensation is specifically dependent on the performance of the Fund that they manage, on an absolute basis or relative to a specific benchmark. No Portfolio Manager is compensated based on the growth of the Fund’s, or any other clients’, assets except to the extent that such growth contributes to Oaktree’s overall asset growth, which in turn contributes to its overall profitability. Portfolio Managers do not receive a percentage of the revenue earned on any client portfolios, and their compensation is not increased or decreased specifically as a result of any performance fee that may be earned by Oaktree with respect to the funds or accounts they manage.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Period | | (a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased | | | (b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) | | | (c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
Month #1 (01/01/23-01/31/23) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Month #2 (02/01/23-02/28/23)(1) | | | 15,066 | | | $ | 8.88 | | | | 15,066 | | | | - | |
Month #3 (03/01/23-03/31/23) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Month #4 (04/01/23-04/30/23) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Month #5 (05/01/23-05/31/23) (2) | | | 9,212 | | | $ | 8.82 | | | | 9,212 | | | | - | |
Month #6 (06/01/23-06/30/23) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Month #7 (07/01/23-07/31/23) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Month #8 (08/01/23-08/31/23) (3) | | | 89,947 | | | $ | 8.91 | | | | 89,947 | | | | - | |
Month #9 (09/01/23-09/30/23) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Month #10 (10/01/23-10/31/23) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Month #11 (11/01/23-11/30/23)(4) | | | 82,527 | | | $ | 8.87 | | | | 82,527 | | | | - | |
Month #12 (12/01/23-12/31/23) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total | | | 196,752 | | | | - | | | | 196,752 | | | | - | |
| (1) | On January 9, 2023, the Registrant offered to repurchase up to 10.0% of the Registrant’s total outstanding shares as of February 13, 2023 (the “Repurchase Request Deadline”). On the Repurchase Request Deadline, 15,066 shares representing 0.1% of the Registrant’s total outstanding shares were repurchased. |
| (2) | On April 10, 2023, the Registrant offered to repurchase up to 10.0% of the Registrant’s total outstanding shares as of May 15, 2023 (the “Repurchase Request Deadline”). On the Repurchase Request Deadline, 9,212 shares representing 0.0% (rounds to less than 0.05%) of the Registrant’s total outstanding shares were repurchased. |
| (3) | On July 10, 2023, the Registrant offered to repurchase up to 10.0% of the Registrant’s total outstanding shares as of August 14, 2023 (the “Repurchase Request Deadline”). On the Repurchase Request Deadline, 89,947 shares representing 0.4% of the Registrant’s total outstanding shares were repurchased. |
| (4) | On October 6, 2023, the Registrant offered to repurchase up to 10.0% of the Registrant’s total outstanding shares as of November 13, 2023 (the “Repurchase Request Deadline”). On the Repurchase Request Deadline, 82,527 shares representing 0.3% of the Registrant’s total outstanding shares were repurchased. |
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s Board of Directors.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
| (a) | The Registrant’s President/Principal Executive Officer and Treasurer/Principal Financial Officer have reviewed the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report, as required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Act and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on their review, such officers have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in this report is appropriately recorded, processed, summarized and reported and made known to them by others within the Registrant and by the Registrant’s service provider. |
| (b) | There were no changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
The registrant did not engage in securities lending activities during the fiscal year reported on this Form N-CSR.
Item 13. Exhibits.
| (a) | (1) Any code of ethics or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy Item 2 requirements through filing an exhibit. Not Applicable. |
(2) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
(3) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the Act sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons. Not applicable.
(4) Change in the registrant’s independent public accountant. There was no change in the registrant’s independent public accountant for the period covered by this report.
| (c) | CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-257789 on Form N-2 of our report dated February 27, 2024, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial highlights of Oaktree Diversified Income Fund Inc. and appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR for the year ended December 31, 2023, and to the references to us under the headings "Financial Highlights" and "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Prospectus and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Financial Statements” in the Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
| |
| Chicago, Illinois |
| February 27, 2024 |