Exclusive Forum Provision
Our articles of incorporation provide that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of Mercer Bancorp, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of Mercer Bancorp to Mercer Bancorp or its stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine will be conducted in a state or federal court located within the State of Maryland, in all cases subject to the court’s having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants. This exclusive forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in its preferred judicial forum for disputes with Mercer Bancorp and its directors, officers, and other employees. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to claims arising under the federal securities laws.
Maryland Law and Mercer Bancorp’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws, as well as Maryland law, contain a number of provisions relating to corporate governance and rights of stockholders that might discourage future takeover attempts. As a result, stockholders who might desire to participate in such transactions may not have an opportunity to do so. In addition, these provisions will also render the removal of our board of directors or management more difficult.
Directors. Our board of directors is divided into three classes. The members of each class are elected for a term of three years, and only one class of directors is elected annually. Therefore, it would take at least two annual elections to replace a majority of our directors. The bylaws establish qualifications for board members, including restrictions on affiliations with competitors of Mercer Savings Bank, restrictions based on prior legal or regulatory violations, and a residency requirement. Further, our bylaws impose notice and information requirements in connection with the nomination by stockholders of candidates for election to the board of directors or the proposal by stockholders of business to be acted upon at an annual meeting of stockholders. Such notice and information requirements are applicable to all stockholder business proposals and nominations, and are in addition to any requirements under the federal securities laws.
Evaluation of Offers. Our articles of incorporation provide that the board of directors, when evaluating a transaction that would or may involve a change in control of Mercer Bancorp (whether by purchases of its securities, merger, consolidation, share exchange, dissolution, liquidation, sale of all or substantially all of its assets, proxy solicitation or otherwise), may, in connection with the exercise of its business judgment in determining what is in the best interests of Mercer Bancorp and its stockholders and in making any recommendation to the stockholders, give due consideration to all relevant factors, including, but not limited to, financial aspects of the proposed transaction, the effect of the transaction on employees, customers and the local community, the reputation and business practices of the other party involved in the proposed transaction, and antitrust or other legal issues raised by the transaction. If the board of directors determines that any proposed transaction should be rejected, it may take any lawful action to defeat such transaction.
Restrictions on Calling Special Meetings. Our bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders can be called by only the President, Chief Executive Officer or Chairperson of the board of directors, a majority of the total number of directors that Mercer Bancorp would have if there were no vacancies on the board of directors, or the Secretary upon the written request of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of all votes entitled to vote at the meeting.
Prohibition of Cumulative Voting. The articles of incorporation prohibit cumulative voting for the election of directors.
Limitation of Voting Rights. The articles of incorporation provide that in no event is any person who beneficially owns more than 10% of the then-outstanding shares of common stock permitted to vote any of the shares of common stock held in excess of the 10% limit. The 10% limit will not apply if, before the stockholder acquires shares in excess of the 10% limit, the acquisition is approved by a majority of the directors who are not affiliated with the holder and who were members of the board of directors before the time of the acquisition (or who were chosen to fill any vacancy of an otherwise unaffiliated director by a majority of the unaffiliated directors).