Franklin BSP Real Estate Credit BDC 10-12G/A Registration of securities (amended)

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2024

File No. 000-56653

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Amendment No. 1 to

FORM 10

GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES

PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FRANKLIN BSP REAL ESTATE DEBT BDC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Delaware	99-1918767
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or registration)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1345 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 32A, New York, NY	10105
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(212) 588-6700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

with copies to:

Richard J. Byrne Franklin BSP Real Estate Debt BDC 1345 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 32A New York, NY 10105 Rajib Chanda Steven Grigoriou Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 900 G. Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20001 Benjamin Wells Ryan Bekkerus Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Shares, par value $0.001 per share

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Explanatory Note
Forward-Looking Statements			1
Summary Risk Factors			3
Item 1.	Business		5
Item 1A.	Risk factors		56
Item 2.	Financial information		106
Item 3.	Properties.		114
Item 4.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		115
Item 5.	Trustees and Executive Officers		116
Item 6.	Executive Compensation		123
Item 7.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Trustee Independence		124
Item 8.	Legal Proceedings		127
Item 9.	Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters		128
Item 10.	Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities		130
Item 11.	Description of Registrant’s Securities to be Registered		131
Item 12.	Indemnification of Trustees and Officers		136
Item 13.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		137
Item 14.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		138
Item 15.	Financial Statements and Exhibits		139

i

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Franklin BSP Real Estate Debt BDC is filing this amendment no. 1 to the registration statement on Form 10 (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), on a voluntary basis in order to permit it to file an election to be regulated as a business development company (a “BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and to provide current public information to the investment community.

In this Registration Statement, except where the context suggests otherwise, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer to Franklin BSP Real Estate Debt BDC. We refer to Benefit Street Partners L.L.C., in its role as our investment adviser, as our “Advisor,” and in its role as our administrator, as our “Administrator.” We refer to “Benefit Street Partners” or “BSP” to mean Benefit Street Partners L.L.C., together with any entity that is controlled by, controls or is under common control with Benefit Street Partners, and any of their respective predecessor entities; provided, however, this shall not include affiliates solely due to common ownership by Franklin Resources, Inc. We refer to “Other BSP Accounts” to mean investment funds, real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), vehicles, accounts, products and/or other similar arrangements sponsored, advised and/or managed by BSP, whether currently in existence or subsequently established (in each case, including any related successor funds, alternative vehicles, separately managed accounts, supplemental capital vehicles, surge funds, over-flow funds, co-investment vehicles and other entities formed in connection with BSP side-by-side or additional general partner investments with respect thereto).

The term “shareholders” refers to holders of our common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Shares”).

The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). As a result, the Company is eligible to take advantage of certain reduced disclosure and other requirements that are otherwise applicable to public companies including, but not limited to, not being subject to the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation as a Business Development Company—JOBS Act.”

This Registration Statement does not constitute an offer of securities of the Company or any other BSP entity. Upon the effective date of this Registration Statement, we will be subject to the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, including the rules and regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act, which will require us, among other things, to file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K. We will also be required to comply with all other obligations of the Exchange Act applicable to issuers filing registration statements pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. Additionally, we will be subject to the proxy rules in Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the Company, trustees, executive officers and principal shareholders will be subject to the reporting requirements of Sections 13 and 16 of the Exchange Act. The SEC maintains an Internet Website (http://www.sec.gov) that will contain the reports mentioned in this section.

We filed an election to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act on June 6, 2024. Upon filing of such election, we became subject to the 1940 Act requirements applicable to BDCs.

Investing in our shares may be considered speculative and involves a high degree of risk, including the following:

• Our shares may not be transferred or resold unless it is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and is otherwise in compliance with the transfer restrictions set forth in our Declaration of Trust.

• Our shares are not currently listed on an exchange, and it is uncertain whether they will be listed or whether a secondary market will develop. Therefore, our shares constitute illiquid investments.

• Investment in us is suitable only for sophisticated investors and requires the financial ability and willingness to accept the high risks and lack of liquidity inherent in an investment in us.

• An investment in us may not be suitable for investors who may need the money they invest in a specified time frame.

• Our distributions may be funded from unlimited amounts of offering proceeds or borrowings, which may constitute a return of capital and reduce the amount of capital available to us for investment. Any capital returned to you through distributions will be distributed after payment of fees and expenses.

• The amount and frequency of our distributions are uncertain. There is a risk that shareholders may not receive distributions or that our distributions may not grow or may be reduced over time.

As a result, there is a risk of a substantial loss of your investment. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for more information about these and other risks relating to our shares.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the statements in this Registration Statement constitute forward-looking statements because they relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this Registration Statement may include statements as to:

• our future operating results;

• our business prospects and the prospects of the assets in which we may invest;

• changes in political, economic or industry conditions, the inflation and interest rate environment or conditions affecting the financial and capital markets;

• the impact of the investments that we expect to make;

• our ability to raise sufficient capital to execute our investment and lending strategies;

• the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;

• our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;

• our expected financings and investments;

• the adequacy of our cash resources, financing sources and working capital;

• the timing and amount of cash flows, distributions and dividends, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies;

• actual and potential conflicts of interest with our Advisor and its affiliates, and its senior investment team;

• the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its effect on the industries in which we invest;

• the ability to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and maintain our qualification as a BDC;

• the timing, form and amount of any distributions;

• the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on our business;

• the valuation of any investments in portfolio companies, particularly those having no liquid trading market;

• the impact of changes to generally accepted accounting principles, and the impact to the Company;

• the impact of changes to tax legislation and, generally, our tax position;

• the ability of our Advisor to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and administer our investments; and

• the ability of our Advisor and its affiliates to attract and retain highly talented professionals.

In addition, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “may,” “continue,” “seek,” “estimate,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “target,” “project,” and variations of these words and similar expressions indicate a forward-looking statement, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. The forward-looking statements contained in this Registration Statement involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those implied or express in the forward-looking statements for any

1

reason, including the factors set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” some of which also appear elsewhere in this Registration Statement. Examples of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include:

• changes in the economy, particularly those affecting the real estate industry;

• risks associated with possible disruption in our operations or the economy generally due to terrorism, war and military conflicts, natural disasters, epidemics or other events having a broad impact on the economy;

• adverse conditions in the areas where our investments or the properties underlying such investments are located and local real estate conditions;

• future changes in laws or regulations and conditions in our operating areas;

• distributions are not guaranteed and may be funded from sources other than cash flow from operations, including, without limitation, borrowings, offering proceeds, the sale of our assets, and repayments of our real estate debt investments, and we have no limits on the amounts we may fund from such sources;

• the purchase prices for our Common Shares are generally based on our net asset value (“NAV”) determined within 48 hours of the issuance of Common Shares and are not based on any public trading market; and

• future changes in laws or regulations and conditions in our operating areas.

Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this Registration Statement should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Registration Statement. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Registration Statement. Moreover, we assume no duty and do not undertake to update the forward-looking statements and projections contained in this Registration Statement. The forward-looking statements and projections contained in this Registration Statement are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.

2

SUMMARY RISK FACTORS

The following is only a summary of the principal risks that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and cash flows. The following should be read in conjunction with the complete discussion of the material risk factors we may face, which are set forth below under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

Some of the more significant risks relating to our business, our private offering and investment in our Common Shares include:

Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure

• The Company has no operating history and will begin operations upon the initial closing.

• We are dependent on Benefit Street Partners and its affiliates, including the Advisor, and their key personnel who provide services to us through the Investment Advisory Agreement (as defined herein), and we may not find a suitable replacement for the Advisor if the Investment Advisory Agreement is terminated, or for these key personnel if they leave Benefit Street Partners or otherwise become unavailable to us.

• Our Advisor manages our portfolio pursuant to broad investment guidelines and is not required to seek the approval of our Board of Trustees for each investment, financing, asset allocation or hedging decision made by it, which may result in our making riskier loans and other investments and which could materially and adversely affect us.

• There is no public trading market for our Common Shares and we do not intend to effect a share repurchase program; therefore, you are not able to dispose of your Common Shares during the Term (as defined herein) of the Company unless approved by the Adviser.

• We may pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations, including, without limitation, borrowings, offering net proceeds and the sale of or repayments under our investments, and we have no limits on the amounts we may fund from such sources.

• Valuations of our investments may reflect estimates of fair value and may not necessarily correspond to realizable value, which could adversely affect the value of your investment.

• Our Board of Trustees may amend our Declaration of Trust without prior shareholder approval.

Risks Related to Our Investments

• Our commercial real estate investments are subject to the risks typically associated with ownership of commercial real estate.

• Commercial mortgage loans that the Company may originate or in which it may invest have certain distinct risk characteristics.

• Most of our investments are illiquid and we may not be able to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions, which may result in losses to us.

• During periods of rising interest rates, our interest expense increases may outpace any increases in interest we earn on our assets, and the value of our assets may decrease.

• Real estate valuation is inherently subjective and uncertain.

• We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities and competition may limit our ability to originate and/or acquire desirable investments in our target assets and could also affect the pricing of these assets.

3

Risks Related to Debt Financing

• When we borrow money, the potential for loss on amounts invested in us will be magnified and may increase the risk of investing in us. Borrowed money may also adversely affect the return on our assets, reduce cash available for distribution to our shareholders and result in losses.

• We may use repurchase agreements to finance our investments, which may expose us to risks that could result in losses, including due to cross-defaults and cross-collateralization under warehouse repurchase and credit facilities.

• We may not be able to access financing sources on attractive terms, if at all, which could adversely affect our ability to fund and grow our business, or result in dilution to our existing shareholders.

Risks Related to Our Relationship with the Advisor

• We depend on the Advisor to select our investments and otherwise conduct our business, and any material adverse change in its financial condition or our relationship with the Advisor could have a material adverse effect on our business and ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest

• Various potential and actual conflicts of interest will arise, and these conflicts may not be identified or resolved in a manner favorable to us.

• The Advisor faces a conflict of interest because the fees it receives for services performed are based in part on our NAV, which the Advisor is ultimately responsible for determining.

• The fee structure set forth in the Investment Advisory Agreement may not create proper incentives for the Advisor.

• Certain Other BSP Accounts have similar or overlapping investment objectives and guidelines, and we will not be allocated certain opportunities and may be allocated only opportunities with lower relative returns.

Risks Related to Our REIT Status and Certain Other Tax Items

• Our failure to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year would subject us to U.S. federal income tax and applicable state and local taxes, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

• Qualifying as a REIT involves highly technical and complex provisions of the Code.

• Our Board of Trustees is authorized to revoke our REIT election without shareholder approval, which may cause adverse consequences to our shareholders.

Risks Related to Our BDC Status

• Any failure on our part to maintain our status as a BDC would reduce our operating flexibility.

• Regulations governing our operation as a BDC affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital.

• The Company may be precluded from investing in what the Advisor believes to be attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act.

4

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

The Company

We are a newly formed, externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act and intends to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and to qualify annually thereafter, as a REIT. We were formed as a Delaware statutory trust on March 11, 2024. As a BDC and a REIT, we must comply with certain regulatory requirements. See “—Regulation as a Business Development Company” and “—Certain U.S. Tax Considerations.”

We are externally managed by the Advisor. Our Advisor is a limited liability company that is registered as an investment advisor under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). Our Advisor oversees the management of our activities and is responsible for making investment decisions with respect to our portfolio.

The Company’s investment objectives are to seek to provide high current income while maintaining downside protection.

The Company will seek to invest in assets that will enable it to:

• provide current income in the form of regular, stable cash distributions to achieve an attractive distribution yield;

• preserve and protect invested capital, by primarily focusing on high-quality credit investments supported by current cash-flow and/or limited business plan risk in the underlying assets;

• reduce downside risk by investing in loans with relatively low loan-to-value ratios, meaning we generally invest in less risky loans with low interest rates which are backed by high-quality real assets, with a focus on residential lending and with meaningful borrower equity; and

• provide an investment alternative for shareholders seeking to allocate a portion of their long-term investment portfolios to commercial real estate (“CRE”) debt with expected lower volatility than publicly traded securities and compelling risk-adjusted returns compared to fixed income alternatives.

We intend to use our proceeds from our private offering of common shares (the “offering”) to finance our investment objectives. The Company’s investment strategy is to originate, acquire, finance and manage a portfolio of primarily CRE investments, focused on senior secured, CRE loans across a wide range of geography. Under normal circumstances, we will invest directly or indirectly at least 80% of our total assets (i.e., net assets plus borrowings for investment purposes) in debt instruments issued by companies primarily engaged in the business of owning and/or operating real estate. Our 80% policy with respect to investments is not fundamental and may be changed by our Board of Trustees without shareholder approval. Shareholders will be provided with sixty (60) days’ notice in the manner prescribed by the SEC before we make any changes to this policy.

For over 50% of the Company’s portfolio, the Company intends to target middle market companies, which the Company generally defines as companies that have loans between $25 million and $100 million, although the Company may invest in larger or smaller companies. The Company will invest across a mix of asset classes, but intends to invest more than 50% of its portfolio in residential lending, that is, loans to companies that own residential properties, including multi-family homes. It is expected that most of the borrowers will be eligible portfolio companies, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act. To a lesser extent, the Company may invest in, or originate, other real-estate related debt and equity investments, which may include subordinated debt, commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”). The Company believes its real estate-related debt and equity investments will help manage cash before investing subscription proceeds into investments while also seeking attractive current income.

The Company will seek to focus on a flexible mix of credit and other real estate investments associated with high-quality assets to generate current cash flow. The Company seeks to identify attractive risk-reward investment opportunities with a focus on financing middle market investments. The Company expects to create

5

synergies with Benefit Street Partner’s commercial real estate team’s existing debt sourcing capabilities by leveraging its significant scale and existing relationships to source high quality lending opportunities.

We may co-invest, subject to the conditions included in the exemptive order received by our Advisor from the SEC, with certain of our affiliates. See “—Allocation of Co-Investment Opportunities” and “Item 7. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Trustee Independence” below. We believe that such co-investments afford us additional investment opportunities and an ability to build a diverse portfolio.

As a BDC, we are generally required to invest at least 70% of our total assets in securities of private and certain U.S. public companies (other than certain financial institutions), cash, cash equivalents and U.S. government securities and other limited float high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less.

We are permitted to borrow money from time to time within the levels permitted by the 1940 Act that are applicable to us. Subject to the receipt of certain approvals and compliance with certain disclosure requirements, we are permitted to reduce our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act from 200% to 150% so long as we meet certain disclosure requirements. On April 8, 2024, our sole shareholder approved the reduced asset coverage requirements and declined the Company’s offer to repurchase all of its outstanding Common Shares. As a result, we are subject to the reduced asset coverage requirements in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act, which permit a BDC to double the maximum amount of leverage that it is permitted to incur by reducing the asset coverage requirements applicable to such BDC from 200% to 150%.

Our Advisor, BSP and Franklin Templeton

Our Advisor is served by Benefit Street Partners’ commercial real estate origination, investment and portfolio management team. BSP consists of over 100 investment professionals and over 250 total employees as of March 31, 2024.

BSP is a leading credit-focused alternative asset management firm with approximately $42 billion in assets under management as of December 31, 2023. Established in 2008, the BSP platform manages funds for institutions and high-net-worth investors across various credit funds and complementary strategies, including private/opportunistic debt, structured credit, high yield, special situations, and commercial real estate debt. These strategies complement each other as they all leverage the sourcing, analytical, compliance, and operational capabilities that encompass BSP’s robust platform.

Our Advisor’s core commercial real estate investment committee consists of Michael Comparato, Head of Real Estate, Senior Portfolio Manager of BSP Real Estate (“BSP RE”), Jerome Baglien, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of BSP RE, Tanya Mollova, Managing Director of BSP RE, and Matthew Jacobs, Managing Director and Chief Credit Officer of BSP RE, each with substantial experience in originating, underwriting and structuring real estate credit investments.

Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Franklin Templeton”) (NYSE: BEN), an affiliate of the Advisor, is a global investment management organization with subsidiaries and serving clients in over 150 countries. Franklin Templeton’s mission is to help clients achieve better outcomes through investment management expertise, wealth management and technology solutions. Through its specialist investment managers, the company offers specialization on a global scale, bringing extensive capabilities in fixed income, equity, alternatives, and multi-asset solutions. With more than 1,300 investment professionals, and offices in major financial markets around the world, the California-based company has more than 75 years of investment experience and approximately $1.6 trillion in assets under management as of January 31, 2024.

Investment Strategy

The Company’s investment strategy is to originate, acquire, finance and manage a portfolio of primarily CRE debt investments, focused on senior secured, CRE loans diversified across geography. More specifically, for at least 80% of our portfolio, we will target debt instruments issued by companies primarily engaged in the business of

6

owning and/or operating real estate. The Company will focus its investments in the middle market across a diversified mix of asset classes, but maintain a focus on residential lending. It is expected that most of the borrowers will be eligible portfolio companies, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act. To a lesser extent, the Company may invest in, or originate, other real-estate related debt and equity investments, which may include subordinated debt, CMBS and CLOs. The Company believes its real estate-related debt and equity investments will help manage cash before investing subscription proceeds into investments while also seeking attractive current income.

The Company will seek to focus on a flexible mix of real estate investments, secured by high-quality assets to generate current cash flow. The Company seeks to identify attractive risk-reward investment opportunities by financing middle market investment companies. The Company expects to create synergies with Benefit Street Partner’s commercial real estate team’s existing debt sourcing capabilities by leveraging its significant scale and existing relationships to source high quality lending opportunities.

Before the Company has raised substantial proceeds in the offering and acquired a diversified portfolio of investments or during periods in which the Advisor determines that economic or market conditions are unfavorable to shareholders and a defensive strategy would benefit the Company, the Company may temporarily deviate from its investment strategy. During these periods, subject to compliance with the 1940 Act, the Company may expand or change its investment strategy and target assets temporarily, including by investing all or any portion of its assets in U.S. government securities, including bills, notes and bonds differing as to maturity and rates of interest that are either issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury or by U.S. government agencies or instrumentalities; non-U.S. government securities that have received the highest investment grade credit rating; certificates of deposit issued against funds deposited in a bank or a savings and loan association; commercial paper; bankers’ acceptances; fixed time deposits; shares of money market funds; credit-linked notes; repurchase agreements with respect to any of the foregoing; or any other fixed income securities that the Advisor considers consistent with this temporary strategy. It is impossible to predict when, or for how long, the Company will use this temporary strategy. There can be no assurance that such strategy will be successful.

Market Opportunity

We expect the Company to benefit from dislocations in the broader market as the lending market has become more fractured and less centralized in money-center banks. This was a trend that began after the global financial crisis and continues today, particularly in the middle market segment. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic sidelined or limited competitors in the middle market space that were undercapitalized or dependent on bank financing for their positions. Additionally, dislocation in regional banks has introduced another limitation on credit providers in the middle market and we expect to be well poised to fill this void. With close to $1 trillion in real estate debt maturing over the next two years, the Company expects ample opportunities to take advantage of these trends.

Large, persistent and compelling market opportunity. As of the third quarter of 2023, the U.S. real estate debt market is approximately $5.8 trillion, with over $1 trillion of real estate debt maturing in 2024 and 2025 that requires refinancing.

7

Primarily comprised of multifamily lending by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This could also include finance companies (private debt funds, REITs, CLOs, etc), pension funds, government or other sources.

Lag in CRE loan defaults. Historically, commercial real estate loan delinquency rates peaked after approximately two years from the beginning of a recession. We expect the real estate dislocation to trail the capital markets dislocation.

We believe a combination of factors will drive refinancing opportunities for well capitalized funds. The Federal Reserve has aggressively raised interest rates with the 1-month SOFR rising from 0.05% to over 5.30% from January 2022 to January 2024. We expect this to result in refinancing and financing challenges for real estate equity investors. We believe existing borrowers will have trouble meeting the requirements for extension with declining debt service coverage and compounded by widening cap rates which, in our experience, will impact valuations.

8

Real Estate Lending Market Is Facing a Shift From Public Lending to Private Lending. Real estate lending has been dramatically reduced due to the market sell off in the mortgage REIT industry. Price-to-book multiples, which are derived from a stock’s price-to-book ratios (i.e., a stock’s market value compared to its book value) of public real estate lending funds have decreased from approximately 1.15x to 0.70x in the last three and a half years, starting in February 2020 just before COVID-19, as shown in the graph below. At depressed valuation levels, issuance of real estate debt and equity becomes more expensive and/or impractical. Additionally, public mortgage REITs originated far less in recent periods compared to prior to the pandemic. In our view, this has left additional opportunities in the space for private lenders such as the Company.

9

Investment Process

The Advisor utilizes a defined and systematic process across all investment types in its commercial real estate platform when analyzing and managing investments that details workflows and responsibilities from initial sizing through closing of an investment. Utilizing this single process allows the Advisor to take a hands-on approach and evaluate all investment equally in order to preserve and create value. The following chart illustrates our investment process for all of our investments.

Sourcing. The Advisor has developed a multi-channel sourcing network through its close relationships with developers, real estate sponsors, local brokers, banks, investment banks, B-piece buyers and other strategic partners. Given the large scale and consistent presence of the Advisor’s origination team across the platform, the commercial real estate team has historically had significant access to what the Advisor believes to be comparatively attractive deals in addition to the ability to negotiate relatively favorable terms. Leveraging relationships across the full private credit and real estate platforms has led to a meaningfully high percentage of repeat borrowers and, as a result, the Advisor is often awarded deals over competitors offering more favorable terms.

Approximately 50% of deals are sourced by the Advisor with incumbent relationships. The Advisor’s real estate team maintains an in-house underwriting team and originations are run out of offices in New York, California, Florida, Georgia, and Texas. The origination team has extensive experience across all property types and geographic areas. The origination team’s focus is on its individualized strategic relationships with broker and real estate owners’ clients directly, relationships that have been developed and maintained for on average over 15 years across the senior origination team.

Application Stage. We create a Preliminary Asset Summary Report (a “Prelim ASR”) within 72 hours of a term sheet on an investment being executed. This Prelim ASR is circulated to all members of the Advisor’s Real Estate team, including all investment committee members. The investment committee for the Company (the “Investment Committee”) is currently composed of Michael Comparato, Jerome Baglien, Matthew Jacobs, and

10

Tanya Mollova. Creating the Prelim ASR at initial term sheet stage allows all Investment Committee members to have full understanding of forward pipeline investments, for the finance team to proactively identify proper financing sources and minimize time from closing to financing, and the asset management team to ensure proper structure for ongoing monitoring.

Full Due Diligence. The due diligence team consists typically of a dedicated underwriter, who reports directly to the Chief Credit Officer of the Advisor, a team analyst and an internal legal team member. The underwriter is responsible for all aspects of the diligence process, including financial and tenant analysis, third-party report engagement, market reconnaissance, sponsorship diligence, site inspections, cash flow modeling, and investment memo creation. The underwriter will leverage the team analyst, under its direction, for certain aspects of the process. Additionally, the underwriter may use various third-party research sources to augment their diligence process, though always maintains full responsibility for the process. The diligence team additionally includes an internal legal team member, who reports to the Real Estate General Counsel of the Advisor, as well as outside counsel to perform legal due diligence and draft documents.

Pre-Closing and Investment Committee. The Advisor’s Real Estate team utilizes its extensive internal underwriting process to evaluate and mitigate risk. Prior to the team issuing an application to proceed with underwriting, all potential transactions are reviewed by either the Chief Credit Officer of the Advisor or Head of BSP RE to identify any upfront risks and ensure proper mitigation is achievable. To the extent a transaction proceeds to underwriting, the underwriting process for every investment is headed by a member of the internal dedicated underwriting team of BSP RE, whose sole function is to identify and mitigate transaction risks.

Upon completion of full due diligence, the deal team formally presents the investment opportunity to the Investment Committee for approval, which is required for deal approval and funding, future funding/additional capital advances, modifications to legal documents, sales, and material deviations from business plans. Majority vote is required but unanimous vote has been the standard historically. Senior business personnel oversee the financing, operations, and monitoring of investments.

Closing. To fund and execute a debt investment, numerous approvals and documentation are required prior to funding to help eliminate any transaction errors. First, the deal team is required to provide an Investment Committee memo which details the rationale of the investment. The investment memo is signed off and approved by the Investment Committee. The day of funding, the deal team provides a loan funding package to the finance and operations team. The loan funding package includes all approvals of the investment from the Investment Committee, the operations loan onboarding sheet, sources and uses summary and a tax checklist. Ultimately before the finance team sends out any cash for deal funding, the legal team signs off on the wire instructions to ensure the cash is provided to the correct party. Once the deal is funded, the finance team sends an email to the deal team and legal team with the federal reference wire number to ensure the cash can be tracked back to the correct party.

Post-Close Monitoring. The internal asset management team consists of nine people and while everyone has some level of familiarity with the entire portfolio, the assets are split amongst the personnel based largely on sponsorship and geographic concentrations.

On an asset level, the Advisor’s asset management team is responsible for monthly and quarterly reporting on our investments. We perform an asset-by-asset review of all our positions every quarter for performance, risk, and any material updates. Any interim updates to assets are communicated on an as-needed basis to senior BSP RE management.

Investment and Monitoring

BSP manages multiple real estate debt funds with similar investing mandates to the Company and BSP believes that the policies and guidelines that apply to BSP’s real estate debt funds are highly relevant and applicable to the Company.

11

Transcending all components of BSP’s investment strategy is the overarching goal of downside protection at the Company-level through best-in-class portfolio management. BSP seeks to accomplish this objective through disciplined application of risk management best practices across the portfolio combined with Company-level diversification across several discrete dimensions. BSP’s risk management practices are grounded in an established investment process comprising systematic underwriting, rigorous due diligence, third-party reports, and Investment Committee approval accompanied by a proprietary and dynamic post-investment monitoring system for regularly updating issuer data.

• On a quarterly basis, the Investment Committee performs a review of the real estate debt and equity investments and then approves the valuation of such investments.

• On a quarterly basis, for securities, position reconciliations are performed against a third party statement.

• For real estate properties, a site visit is performed prior to acquisition and title/deed of each properties are obtained at acquisition.

Our investment process is segregated by underwriting and origination with separate teams and leadership on the two sides of the business. Investments are approved by the Investment Committee prior to funding and BSP has a closing process in place to ensure all proper authorizations are in place.

On an asset level, our asset management team monitors monthly and quarterly reporting on our investments. Quarterly we perform an asset-by-asset review of all our positions to review performance, risk, and any material updates. Any interim updates to assets are communicated on an as-needed basis to senior BSP RE management.

In addition, all assets are visited by a BSP team member at a minimum once per annum. Further, as many of the properties are undergoing construction, BSP engages an engineer to visit the properties and inspect work on our behalf, as needed.

We assess any potential impairments or reserves on our loans via our risk rating and valuation process, generally on a quarterly basis. There may additionally be events that could trigger inter-quarter assessments based on failed covenants or borrower developments.

As part of our quarterly asset review process (“QAR”), we assign internal credit ratings on all loans originated. See below for the detail on the risk rating scale. Risk rating categories range from “1” to “5” with “1” representing the lowest risk of loss and “5” representing the highest risk of loss with the ratings updated quarterly. At the time of origination or purchase, loans held for investment are ranked as a “2” and will move accordingly going forward based on the ratings which are defined as follows:

1) Very Low Risk: Investment exceeding fundamental performance expectations and/or capital gain expected. Trends and risk factors since time of investment are favorable.

2) Low Risk: Performing consistent with expectations and a full return of principal and interest expected. Trends and risk factors are neutral to favorable.

3) Average Risk: Performing investments requiring closer monitoring. Trends and risk factors show some deterioration.

4) High Risk/Delinquent/Potential for Loss: Underperforming investment with the potential of some interest loss but still expecting a positive return on investment. Trends and risk factors are negative.

5) Impaired/Defaulted/Loss Likely: Underperforming investment with expected loss of interest and some principal.

Operationally, we have our team assess the best course of action to mitigate the exposure to the Company which will be a process by which the asset management and legal teams will determine our various courses of

12

action and the likely impacts of each. The senior management team will then determine how they want to proceed. The primary goal of this is to minimize any potential losses and maximize the Company returns.

In times of heightened market volatility or other stress, the investment process remains the same, however, volatility may inform our decisions on making new investments, adjusting the required return for those investments and making any amendments to existing investments.

The Advisor may utilize interest rate caps and/or fixed-to-floating on real estate assets that we own in order to mitigate interest rate exposure.

The Company expects to benefit from dislocations in the broader market whereby the lending market has become more fractured and less centralized in money-center banks. This was a trend that began after the last financial crisis and continues today, particularly in the middle market segment. Additionally, the current market environment has sidelined or limited competitors in the middle market space that were undercapitalized or dependent on bank financing for their positions. Further, dislocation in regional banks has introduced another limitation on credit providers in the middle market and we anticipate being well poised to fill this void. With $1.6 trillion in real estate debt maturing over the next three years as of June 30, 2023, the Company believes there will be ample opportunities for the Company to take advantage of these trends.

In addition, there will be opportunities as it relates to refinancing risk. The federal reserve has aggressively raised interest rates with the 1-month SOFR rising from 0.05% to over 5.00% in a very limited amount of time. We expect this to result in refinancing and financing challenges for real estate equity investors. Existing borrowers will have trouble meeting the requirements for extension with declining debt service coverage compounded by widening cap rates, which will impact valuations.

Term

The Company is non-exchange traded, meaning its Common Shares are not listed for trading on a stock exchange or other securities market, and a fixed-term BDC, meaning it is an investment vehicle of defined duration. The Company’s Shares are intended to be sold by the Company on a continuous basis during the Investment Period (as defined below) at a price generally equal to the Company’s NAV per Share.

Following the initial closing, the Company will have an investment period (the “Investment Period”) of 18 months during which it may invest capital commitments and reinvest proceeds in line with the Company’s investment strategy. Upon the expiration of the Investment Period, any unfunded capital commitments outstanding as of such date shall be canceled and the Company shall not be permitted thereafter to call any unfunded capital commitments or reinvest proceeds, except for as deemed necessary by the Advisor to preserve or enhance the value of the Company’s existing investments. Upon the expiration the Investment Period, the Company would commence an orderly wind-down of the investments, which could include a determination by the Advisor that it is in the best interests of the Company to hold the investments to maturity. The “Term” of the Company shall mean the Investment Period plus the time required to complete the orderly disposition of investments, and in no case shall extend beyond the 4 year anniversary of the end of the Investment Period. We are not obligated by our Declaration of Trust or otherwise to effect a liquidity event at any time. The Board of Trustees would need the consent of the shareholders for the Company to cease to be treated as a BDC.

The Company does not intend to list the Common Shares on a securities exchange and does not expect there to be a public market for the Shares. As a result, the ability to sell Shares is limited.

13

Management and Other Agreements

Investment Advisory Agreement

We entered into an investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) with our Advisor in which the Advisor, subject to the overall supervision of our Board of Trustees, will manage the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to us. Our Board approved an amendment and restatement of the Investment Advisory Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement”). The Advisor and its affiliates also provide investment advisory services to other funds that have investment mandates that are similar, in whole or in part, with ours. The Advisor and its affiliates serve as investment adviser or sub-adviser to private funds, registered open-end funds, a BDC, an interval fund and a public real estate investment trust. In addition, any affiliated fund currently formed or formed in the future and managed by the Advisor or its affiliates may have overlapping investment objectives with our own and, accordingly, may invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by us. However, in certain instances due to regulatory, tax, investment, or other restrictions, certain investment opportunities may not be appropriate for either us or other funds managed by the Advisor or its affiliates.

We will pay the Advisor a fee for its services under the Investment Advisory Agreement consisting of two components: a base management fee (the “Management Fee”) and an incentive fee (the “Incentive Fee”). The cost of both the Management Fee and the Incentive Fee will ultimately be borne by the shareholders.

Management Fee

The Management Fee will be calculated at an annual rate of 0.50% of the Company’s Average Gross Assets (as defined below) payable quarterly in arrears. Management Fees for any partial month or quarter will be prorated.

“Average Gross Assets” shall mean the average value of the Company’s gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters. For these purposes, “gross assets” means the Company’s total assets determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”), and excluding undrawn commitments but including assets purchased with borrowed amounts.

Incentive Fee

The incentive fee will consist of two parts. The first part, referred to as the “Incentive Fee on Income,” shall be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the Company’s “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” (as defined below) for the immediately preceding quarter.

“Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus the Company’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the Management Fee, expenses payable under the Administration Agreement and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred share, but excluding the Incentive Fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount debt instruments with payment-in-kind interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. For purposes of computing the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, the calculation methodology will look through total return swaps (to the extent the Company invests in any, which it does not currently intend to) as if the Company owned the referenced assets directly.

The payment of the Incentive Fee on Income shall be subject to payment of a preferred return to investors each quarter, expressed as a quarterly rate of return on the value of the Company’s gross assets at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter, subject to a “catch up” feature (as described below)

14

The calculation of the Incentive Fee on Income is as follows:

• No Incentive Fee on Income shall be payable to the Advisor in any calendar quarter in which the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the preferred return rate of 1.25% per quarter (or 5.00% annualized) (the “Preferred Return”) on gross assets;

• 100% of the dollar amount of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the Preferred Return but is less than or equal to 1.429% in any calendar quarter (or 5.71% annualized) shall be payable to the Advisor. This portion of the Incentive Fee on Income is referred to as the “catch up” and is intended to provide the Advisor with an incentive fee of 12.5% on all of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income when the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income reaches 1.429% (or 5.71% annualized) in any calendar quarter; and

• For any quarter in which the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 1.429% in any calendar quarter (or 5.71% annualized), the Incentive Fee on Income shall equal 12.5% of the dollar amount of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income as the Preferred Return and catch up will have been achieved.

The second part of the incentive fee, referred to as the “Incentive Fee on Capital Gains During Operations,” shall be calculated based on the Company’s “Capital Gains During Operations” (as defined below) and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, if earlier).

“Capital Gains During Operations” means the Company’s cumulative realized capital gains from the date of the Company’s election to be regulated as a BDC through the end of such calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis. For the purpose of computing the Company’s Capital Gains During Operations, the calculation methodology will look through derivative financial instruments or swaps as if the Company owned the reference assets directly. Therefore, realized gains and realized losses on the disposition of any reference assets, as well as unrealized depreciation on reference assets retained in the derivative financial instrument or swap, will be included on a cumulative basis in the calculation of the Company’s Capital Gains During Operations.

The Incentive Fee on Capital Gains During Operations equals 12.5% of the Company’s Capital Gains During Operations, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid Incentive Fee on Capital Gains During Operations.

Fee Waivers

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Advisor entered into a voluntary fee waiver agreement (the “Fee Waiver Agreement”) with the Company. Pursuant to the Fee Waiver Agreement, the Advisor will irrevocably waive the Management Fee during the Term of the Company. The Advisor will also waive any Incentive Fee for a period of 12 months after the initial closing of the Company’s private placement of Common Shares. Any waived fees are not subject to recoupment.

Duration and Termination

The Advisor serves as our investment adviser pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. Unless terminated earlier, it will remain in effect for an initial term of two years and then continue for successive one-year periods if approved annually by our Board of Trustees or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities, including, in either case, approval by a majority of our trustees who are not interested persons, as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”). The Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. The Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated by us without penalty upon not less than 60 days’ written notice and by the Advisor upon not less than 60 days’ written notice. Any termination by us must be authorized either by our Board of Trustees or by vote of our shareholders.

15

In determining whether to approve the Investment Advisory Agreement, our Board of Trustees requested information from the Advisor that enabled it to evaluate a number of factors relevant to its determination. These factors included the nature, extent and quality of services provided to us by the Advisor, the costs of providing services to us, the profitability of the relationship between us and the Advisor, comparative information on fees and expenses borne by other comparable BDCs or registered investment companies and, as applicable, other advised accounts, and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized as we grow and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of our investors. Based on the information reviewed and the considerations detailed above, our Board of Trustees, including all of the Independent Trustees, concluded that the investment advisory fee rates and terms are fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided and approved the Investment Advisory Agreement as being in the best interests of our shareholders.

Indemnification

The Investment Advisory Agreement and the Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement provide that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties, or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, the Advisor and its officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons, and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of the Advisor’s services under the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser.

Administration Agreement

We entered into the Administration Agreement in which the Administrator provides us with office facilities and certain administrative services necessary for us to conduct our business. We will reimburse the Administrator quarterly for all administrative costs and expenses incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations and providing personnel and facilities under the Administration Agreement and annually for overhead expenses incurred in the course of performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent, travel, and the allocable portion of the cost of our Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Financial Officer and their respective staffs, including operations and tax professionals, and administrative staff providing support services in respect of us.

Our Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, will review the reimbursement of costs and expenses to our Administrator to determine if the provisions of the Administration Agreement are carried out satisfactorily and to determine whether the reimbursement of costs and expenses under the Administration Agreement are reasonable and appropriate. Our Board of Trustees will also review the methodology employed in determining how costs and expenses are allocated to us and the proposed allocation of administrative expenses among us and affiliates of our Administrator.

Custodial Agreement

Our wholly-owned subsidiary, FBRED BDC Finance, LLC, entered into a custodial agreement (the “Custodial Agreement”) with ComputerShare Trust Company, N.A. (the “Custodian”), which also serves as our Custodian. Under the Custodial Agreement, the Custodian shall be responsible for maintaining continuous custody of our assets in accordance with customary standards for such custody. We pay the Custodian an acceptance fee, review fee, release fee, monthly safekeeping fee per commercial property and legal fees at costs.

Expense Limitation Agreement

The Advisor and the Company entered into an Expense Limitation Agreement (the “Expense Limitation Agreement”). Under the Expense Limitation Agreement, the Advisor has agreed on a quarterly basis to reimburse

16

the Company’s Specified Expenses (as defined below) to the extent such annualized Specified Expenses exceed 0.10% of the Company’s quarter-end NAV (the “Expense Cap”). Any reimbursement is not subject to recoupment.

“Specified Expenses” include the Company’s initial organizational and offering costs, as well as the Company’s annualized operating expenses, inclusive of any fees the Company has agreed to bear pursuant to 4(b) of the Administration Agreement, but excluding (i) expenses directly related to the interest costs and structuring costs for borrowing and line(s) of credit, (ii) any taxes, litigation and extraordinary expenses related to any structuring, litigation or other actions taken by the Advisor to preserve or enhance the value of the Investments for the Shareholders and (iii) the Incentive Fees.

The Expense Limitation Agreement shall be in effect during the Term of the Company, unless and until the Board approves its modification or termination.

Private Placement

We intend to offer and sell our Common Shares in a private placement to be conducted in reliance on Regulation D under the Securities Act (“Regulation D”) or Regulation S under the Securities Act (“Regulation S”). Investors in our private placement will be required to be “accredited investors” as defined in Regulation D of the Securities Act or non-U.S. persons under Regulation S. Each investor in the private placement will make a capital commitment (the “Capital Commitments”) to purchase Common Shares pursuant to a subscription agreement (a “Subscription Agreement”). Investors will be required to make capital contributions to purchase Common Shares (the “Drawdown Purchase Price”) each time we deliver a drawdown notice (the “Drawdown Notice”), which will be delivered at least ten business days prior to the required funding date (the “Drawdown Date”), in an aggregate amount not to exceed their respective Capital Commitments. All purchases will generally be made pro rata in accordance with the investors’ Capital Commitments, at a per-share price as determined by the Board of Trustees in accordance with the limitations under Section 23 of the 1940 Act (which generally prohibits us from issuing Common Shares at a price below the then-current NAV of the Common Shares as determined within 48 hours, excluding Sundays and holidays, of such issuance (taking into account any investment valuation adjustments from the latest quarterly valuation date in accordance with the Company’s valuation policy), subject to certain exceptions); provided that the Company retains the right to make non-pro rata capital drawdowns for any reason in the Company’s sole discretion, including, without limitation, if the Company determines that it is necessary or advisable in light of applicable legal, tax, regulatory and other considerations, such as to comply with Section 12d(1) of the 1940 Act or the ownership limits as set forth in our Declaration of Trust. As set forth in each Subscription Agreement, in the event that an investor fails to pay all or any portion of a Drawdown Purchase Price pursuant to a Drawdown Notice, and such default remains uncured for a period of thirty days (such investor, a “Defaulting Subscriber”), the Company will be permitted to pursue any remedies against the Defaulting Subscriber available under the Subscription Agreement or at law or at equity, including prohibiting the Defaulting Subscriber from purchasing additional Common Shares or causing the Defaulting Subscriber to forfeit 50% of the Defaulting Subscriber’s Common Shares to the other shareholders.

An investor will be released from any obligation to purchase additional Common Shares on the earlier of (i) the date that such investor’s Capital Commitment is fully called and (ii) the end of the Investment Period, except to the extent deemed necessary by the Advisor to preserve or enhance the value of the Company’s existing investments.

The private placement is expected to commence shortly after the filing of our election to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act.

Competition

We will compete for investments with a number of capital providers, including BDCs, REITs, other investment funds (including private debt and equity funds and venture capital funds), special purpose acquisition

17

company sponsors, investment banks with underwriting activities, hedge funds that invest in private investments in public equities, traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks, and other sources of financing, including the broadly syndicated loan market and high yield capital market. Many of these capital providers have greater financial and managerial resources than we do. In addition, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC. For additional information concerning the competitive risks we expect to face, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Investments—We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities and competition may limit our ability to originate and/or acquire desirable investments in our target assets and could also affect the pricing of these assets.”

Allocation of Investment Opportunities

General

The Advisor provides investment management services to other BDCs, REITs, registered investment companies, investment funds, client accounts and proprietary accounts that the Advisor may establish.

The Advisor and its affiliates will share any investment and sale opportunities with its other clients and the Company in accordance with the Advisers Act and firm-wide allocation policies, which generally provide for sharing pro rata based on targeted acquisition size or targeted sale size. Subject to the Advisers Act and as further set forth herein, certain other clients may receive certain priority or other allocation rights with respect to certain investments, subject to various conditions set forth in such other clients’ respective governing agreements.

In addition, as a BDC regulated under the 1940 Act, the Company is subject to certain limitations relating to co-investments and joint transactions with affiliates, which likely in certain circumstances limit the Company’s ability to make investments or enter into other transactions alongside other clients.

Co-Investment Relief

The Advisor and its affiliates received an exemptive order from the SEC on May 1, 2018 (the “Order”) that permits us, among other things, to co-invest with certain other persons, including certain affiliates of the Advisor and certain funds managed and controlled by the Advisor and its affiliates, subject to certain terms and conditions. Pursuant to such order, we are permitted to co-invest with one or more BDCs and/or other funds advised by our Adviser and its affiliates if a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of our eligible trustees make certain conclusions in connection with a co-investment transaction, including that (1) the terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair to us and our shareholders and do not involve overreaching in respect of us or our shareholders on the part of any person concerned, (2) the transaction is consistent with the interests of our shareholders and our investment objective and strategies, and (3) the investment by our affiliates would not disadvantage us and our participation would not be on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of others.

Valuation Procedures

The Board of Trustees has designated the Advisor as its “valuation designee” pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. The Advisor, acting pursuant to delegated authority from, and under the oversight of our Board of Trustees, assists the Board of Trustees in its determination of the NAV of our investment portfolio at least quarterly or more frequently as needed for a Drawdown Date. The NAV per share of our outstanding Common Shares is determined by dividing the value of total assets minus liabilities by the total number of shares outstanding. Securities for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the reported closing price on the valuation date. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined by the Advisor. In connection with that determination, the Advisor facilitates the preparation, through

18

the use each quarter of independent valuation firms, portfolio company valuations using relevant inputs, including but not limited to, indicative dealer quotes, values of like securities, the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts.

We classify the fair value measurements of our assets and liabilities into a fair value hierarchy in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, which includes inputs such as quoted prices for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities where there is little or no activity in the market; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available, the Advisor undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

• Each portfolio company or investment will be valued by the Advisor, with assistance from one or more independent valuation firms engaged by our Board of Trustees;

• The independent valuation firm(s) conduct independent appraisals and make an independent assessment of the value of each investment; and

• The Advisor determines the fair value of each investment, in good faith, based on the input of the independent valuation firm (to the extent applicable).

In circumstances where the Advisor deems appropriate, the Advisor’s internal valuation team values certain investments. When performing the internal valuations, the Advisor utilizes similar valuation techniques as an independent third-party pricing service would use. Such valuations will be approved by an internal valuation committee of the Advisor, with oversight from the Board of Trustees.

Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and estimates. Below is a description of factors that the Advisor may consider when valuing our debt and equity investments.

Securities for which market quotations are readily available on an exchange are valued at the reported closing price on the valuation date. The Advisor may also obtain quotes with respect to certain of our investments from pricing services or brokers or dealers in order to value assets. When doing so, the Advisor determines whether the quote obtained is readily available according to GAAP to determine the fair value of the security. If determined to be readily available, the Advisor uses the quote obtained.

Investments without a readily available market quotation are primarily valued using a market approach, an income approach, or both approaches, as appropriate. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a single present amount (discounted). The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts. In following these approaches, the types of factors that the Advisor may take into account in fair value pricing our investments include, as relevant: available current market data, including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction comparables, applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection provisions, information rights, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public, M&A comparables, and enterprise values, among other factors. When available, broker quotations and/or quotations provided by pricing services are considered as an input in the valuation process.

19

Regulation as a Business Development Company

General

The following discussion is a general summary of the material prohibits and descriptions governing BDCs. It does not purport to be a complete description of all of the laws and regulations affecting BDCs. Under the 1940 Act, a BDC may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as “Qualifying Assets”, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, Qualifying Assets represent at least 70% of the company’s total assets. The principal categories of Qualifying Assets relevant to our business are any of the following:

1. Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an Eligible Portfolio Company (as defined below), or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an Eligible Portfolio Company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An Eligible Portfolio Company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which:

a. is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;

b. is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by the BDC) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and

c. satisfies any of the following:

i. does not have any class of securities that is traded on a national securities exchange;

ii. has a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange, but has an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than $250 million;

iii. is controlled by a BDC or a group of companies including a BDC and the BDC has an affiliated person who is a trustee of the Eligible Portfolio Company; or

iv. is a small and solvent company having total assets of not more than $4.0 million and capital and surplus of not less than $2.0 million.

2. Securities of any Eligible Portfolio Company that we control.

3. Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements.

4. Securities of an Eligible Portfolio Company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own 60% of the outstanding equity of the Eligible Portfolio Company.

5. Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities.

6. Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.

In addition, a BDC must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2) or (3) above.

Temporary Investments

Pending investment in other types of “qualifying assets,” as described above, our investments may consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less

20

from the time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying assets. We may also invest in U.S. Treasury bills or in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price that is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements. However, if more than 25% of our gross assets constitute repurchase agreements from a single counterparty, we would not meet the diversification tests in order to qualify as a REIT. Thus, we do not intend to enter into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in excess of this limit. Our Advisor will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties with which we enter into repurchase agreement transactions.

Significant Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies

A BDC must have been organized under the laws of, and have its principal place of business in, any state or states within the United States. However, in order to count portfolio securities as Qualifying Assets for the purpose of the 70% test, the BDC must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial assistance; except that, where the BDC purchases such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making available managerial assistance means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the BDC, through its trustees, officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.

Indebtedness and Senior Securities

The Company is permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of shares senior to the Common Shares if the Company’s asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, would at least equal 150% immediately after each such issuance (subject to shareholder approval pursuant to Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act). On April 8, 2024, our sole initial shareholder approved the adoption of this 150% threshold pursuant to Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act. In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, the Company will be required to make provisions to prohibit any dividend distribution to shareholders unless the Company meets the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the dividend distribution. The Company will also be permitted to borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of its total assets for temporary or emergency purposes, which borrowings would not be considered senior securities.

The Company intends to employ leverage as market conditions permit and at the discretion of the Advisor, but in no event will leverage employed exceed the limitations set forth in the 1940 Act. The Company intends to use leverage in the form of borrowings, including loans from certain financial institutions and the issuance of debt securities. The Company may also use leverage in the form of the issuance of preferred shares, but does not currently intend to do so. In determining whether to borrow money, the Company will analyze the maturity, covenant package and rate structure of the proposed borrowings as well as the risks of such borrowings compared to its investment outlook. Any such leverage, if incurred, would be expected to increase the total capital available for investment by the Company.

The Company expects to employ leverage and otherwise incur indebtedness with respect to its portfolio including entry (directly or indirectly) into one or more credit facilities, including asset-based loan facilities, and/or enter into other financing arrangements to facilitate investments, the timely payment of expenses and other purposes. The Company cannot assure investors that it will be able to enter into a credit facility. Investors will indirectly bear the costs associated with the establishment of a credit facility and with any borrowings under a credit facility or otherwise. In connection with a credit facility or other borrowings, lenders may require the Company to pledge assets and may ask the Company to comply with positive or negative covenants that could have an effect on Fund operations.

21

The Company may pledge and may grant a security interest in all of its assets under the terms of any debt instruments that it enters into with lenders. In addition, from time to time, the Company’s losses on investments may result in the liquidation of other investments held by the Company.

Code of Ethics

We and the Advisor have adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act and Rule 204A-1, under the Advisers Act, respectively, that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain personal securities transactions by our personnel. Personnel subject to the code may invest in securities for their personal investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such investments are made in accordance with the code’s requirements.

Compliance Policies and Procedures

We and our Advisor have adopted and implemented written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws, and our Board of Trustees is required to review these compliance policies and procedures annually to assess their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation. We have designated George Talarico as our Chief Compliance Officer.

Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

We delegate our proxy voting responsibility to our Advisor. The proxy voting policies and procedures that our Advisor follows are set forth below and are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule 206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act. The guidelines will be reviewed periodically by our Advisor and our non-interested trustees, and, accordingly, are subject to change.

As an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, our Advisor has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of its clients. As part of this duty, it recognizes that it must vote client securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best interests of its clients.

Our Advisor will vote proxies relating to our securities in the best interest of its clients’ shareholders. It will review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted for a shareholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by its clients. Although our Advisor will generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on its clients’ portfolio securities, it may vote for such a proposal if there are compelling long-term reasons to do so.

The proxy voting decisions of our Advisor are made by the senior officers who are responsible for monitoring each of its clients’ investments. To ensure that its vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, it will require that: (a) anyone involved in the decision-making process disclose to its Chief Compliance Officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (b) employees involved in the decision making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how our Advisor intends to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.

You may obtain information, without charge, regarding how we voted proxies with respect to our portfolio securities by making a written request for proxy voting information to: Chief Financial Officer, Jerome Baglien, Franklin BSP Real Estate Debt BDC, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 32A, New York, NY 10105.

Privacy Notice

Financial companies choose how they share investors’ personal information. Federal law gives our clients the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell investors how we collect, share, and protect their personal information.

22

We do not disclose nonpublic personal information about our investors or former investors to third parties other than as described below.

We collect personal information about investors in connection with our providing advisory services to them. This information includes investors’ social security number and may include other information such as investors’:

• assets;

• investment experience;

• transaction history;

• income; and

• wire instructions.

We collect this information from investors through various means. For example, when investors give us their contact information, enter into an investment advisory contract with us, buy securities (i.e., interests in a fund) from us, tell us where to send money, or make a wire transfer. We also may collect investors’ personal information from other sources, such as our affiliates (Our affiliates are companies related to us by common ownership or control and can include both financial and nonfinancial companies. Non-affiliates are companies not related to us by common ownership or control and can include both financial and nonfinancial companies.) or other non-affiliated companies.

All financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business and we use the personal information we collect from investors for our everyday business purposes or as permitted by law. These purposes may include for example:

• To provide advisory services to investors;

• To open accounts for investors;

• To process transactions for investors’ accounts;

• To market products and services to investors; and

• To respond to court orders and legal investigations.

We may provide investors’ personal information to our affiliates and to firms that assist us in servicing such investors’ account and have a need for such information, such as a broker or fund administrator. We may also disclose such information to service providers and financial institutions with whom we have joint marketing arrangements (i.e., a formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to investors, such as placement agents). We require third-party service providers and financial institutions with which we have joint marketing arrangements to protect the confidentiality of investors’ information and to use the information only for the purposes for which we disclose the information to them. These sharing practices are consistent with federal privacy and related laws, and in general, investors may not limit our use of their personal information for these purposes under such laws. We note that the federal privacy laws only give investors the right to limit the certain types of information sharing that we do not engage in (e.g., sharing with our affiliates certain information relating to investors’ transaction history or creditworthiness for their use in marketing to such investors, or sharing any personal information with nonaffiliates for them to market to such investors).

To protect investors’ personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings.

23

JOBS Act

We currently are and following completion of this offering expect to remain an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, until the earliest of:

• the last day of our fiscal year in which the fifth anniversary of a listing on a national securities exchange occurs;

• the end of the fiscal year in which our total annual gross revenues first exceed $1.235 billion;

• the date on which we have, during the prior three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt; and

• the last day of a fiscal year in which we (1) have an aggregate worldwide market value of our Common Shares held by non-affiliates of $700 million or more, computed at the end of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter in such fiscal year and (2) have been an Exchange Act reporting company for at least one year (and filed at least one annual report under the Exchange Act).

Under the JOBS Act and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), we are exempt from the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which would require that our independent registered public accounting firm provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, until such time as we cease to be an emerging growth company and become an accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. This may increase the risk that material weaknesses or other deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting go undetected.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards.

Exchange Act and Sarbanes-Oxley Act

We are subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the Exchange Act, including the filing of quarterly, annual and current reports, proxy statements and other required items. In addition, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which imposes a wide variety of regulatory requirements on publicly-held companies and their insiders. Many of these requirements affect us. For example:

• pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are required to certify the accuracy of the financial statements contained in our periodic reports;

• pursuant to Item 307 of Regulation S-K, our periodic reports are required to disclose our conclusions about the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures;

• pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act, our management is required to prepare a report regarding its assessment of our internal control over financial reporting starting with our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 and, when we cease to be an emerging growth company (if we are still an accelerated files or large accelerated filer) must obtain an audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting performed by our independent registered public accounting firm; and

• pursuant to Item 308 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act and Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, our periodic reports must disclose whether there were significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to review our current policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. We will continue to monitor

24

our compliance with all regulations that are adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.

U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The Advisor is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act.

U.S. Securities Act of 1933. The offer and sale of the Common Shares will not be registered under the Securities Act, in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2), Regulation D promulgated thereunder, Regulation S and/or exemptions of similar import in the jurisdictions in which Common Shares are offered and sold. Each purchaser must be (a) an “accredited investor” (as defined in Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act) or (b) a person that qualifies as a non-U.S. person for purposes of Regulation S under the Securities Act and will be required to represent, among other customary private placement representations, that it is acquiring its Common Shares for its own account and for investment purposes only and not with a view to resale or distribution.

Other than the registration under the Exchange Act pursuant to the Registration Statement, the Common Shares will not be registered under any other securities laws, including state securities or blue sky laws and non-U.S. securities laws.

The Common Shares may not be transferred or resold (i) except as permitted under the Subscription Agreement, (ii) unless they are registered under the Securities Act and under any other applicable securities laws or an exemption from such registration thereunder is available and (iii) only as permitted by any other relevant laws of any applicable jurisdiction.

Anti-Money Laundering Requirements. In order to comply with applicable anti-money laundering requirements, the investor must, except as otherwise agreed by the Advisor, represent and warrant in its Subscription Agreement with the Company that neither the investor, nor any of its affiliates or beneficial owners (i) appears on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), nor are they otherwise a party with which the Company is prohibited to deal under the laws of the United States, (ii) appears on the European External Action Service consolidated list of persons, groups and entities subject to EU financial sanctions maintained on behalf of the European Commission, (iii) appears on the Consolidated United Nations Security Council Sanctions List or (iv) is a person identified as a terrorist organization on any other relevant lists maintained by governmental authorities. The investor must also represent and warrant that: (i) if the investor is a natural person, the investor is not a person who is or has been entrusted with prominent public functions, such as Head of State or of government, a senior politician, a senior government, judicial or military official, a senior executive of a state-owned corporation or an important political party official, or a close family member or close associate of such person and (ii) the monies used to fund the investment in the Common Shares are not derived from, invested for the benefit of or related in any way to, the governments of, or persons within, any country that (a) is under a U.S. embargo enforced by OFAC, (b) has been designated as a “non-cooperative country or territory” by the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering or (c) has been designated by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury as a “primary money laundering concern.” The investor must also represent and warrant that the investor: (i) has conducted thorough due diligence with respect to all of its beneficial owners, (ii) has established the identities of all beneficial owners and the source of each of the beneficial owner’s funds and (iii) will retain evidence of any such identities, any such source of funds and any such due diligence. The investor must also represent and warrant that it does not know or have any reason to suspect that (i) the monies used to fund the investor’s investment in the Common Shares have been or will be derived from or related to any illegal activities, including but not limited to, money laundering activities and (ii) the proceeds from the investor’s investment in Common Shares will be used to finance any illegal activities. The investor must also represent and warrant that neither the investor, nor any of its affiliates, nor any person having a direct or indirect beneficial interest in the Common Shares being acquired is (i) a senior foreign political figure (a “SFPF”), (ii) an immediate family member of a SFPF (iii) a close associate of a SFPF, (iv) a politically exposed person (a “PEP”), (v) an immediate family member of a PEP or (vi) a close associate of a PEP (each as

25

defined in the Subscription Agreement). The investor must also represent and warrant that to the extent a beneficial owner is a bank, including a branch, agency or office of a bank, that is not physically located in the United States, that the investor has taken and will take reasonable measures to establish that the bank has a physical presence or is an affiliate of a regulated entity. The investor must also represent and warrant that it has determined that the Company’s being invested by the investor in the Company do not come from corruption. The investor must also agree, except as otherwise agreed by the Advisor, that pursuant to anti-money laundering laws and regulations, the Advisor may be required or determine that it is necessary and appropriate to collect documentation verifying the investor’s identity and the source of funds used to acquire an interest before, and from time to time after, acceptance by the Advisor of the Subscription Agreement.

Bank Holding Company Act. The U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended from time to time, and the rules promulgated thereunder (collectively, the “BHC Act”), including as modified by the Dodd-Frank Act and the “Volcker Rule” thereunder, contain restrictions on certain investors that are (or that have affiliates or certain interest in any entity that is) a bank or a bank-related entity and/or have a connection to the U.S. in that regard from making and holding certain interests in private investment funds. Common Shares in the Company are not freely transferable, are not readily tradable on any exchange or market, and there are generally no redemption or withdrawal rights. As a result, Common Shares must be held on a long-term basis and the prospective investor should carefully review and familiarize itself with these rules and regulations and consult with its own counsel on how the Volcker Rule, the Dodd-Frank Act and the BHC Act may impact the investor, including as a result of its investment in the Company.

Reporting Obligations. We will furnish our shareholders with annual reports containing audited financial statements, quarterly reports, and such other periodic reports as we determine to be appropriate or as may be required by law. We have filed a Form 10 Registration Statement with the SEC voluntarily and establish the Company as a reporting company under the Exchange Act. Upon the effectiveness of the Form 10 Registration Statement, we will be required to comply with all periodic reporting, proxy solicitation and other applicable requirements under the Exchange Act.

Shareholders and the public may access the Company’s public filings at www.sec.gov or obtain information by calling the SEC at (202) 551-8090.

Special Considerations for Plan Investors. Each prospective investor that is, or is acting on behalf of any (i) “employee benefit plan” (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA) that is subject to Title I of ERISA, (ii) “plan” described in Section 4975 of the Code that is subject to Section 4975 of the Code (including, for example, an individual retirement account and a “Keogh” plan), (iii) plan, account or other arrangement that is subject to the provisions of any other federal, state, local, non-U.S. or other laws or regulations that are similar to such provisions of ERISA or the Code (collectively, “Similar Laws”), or (iv) entity whose underlying assets are considered to include the assets of any of the foregoing described in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) (each of the foregoing described in clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) referred to as a “Plan”), must independently determine that the Common Shares are an appropriate investment for the Plan, taking into account its obligations under ERISA, the Code and applicable Similar Laws, and the facts and circumstances of each investing Plan. Prospective investors that are, or are acting on behalf of any, Plan should consult with their own legal, tax, financial and other advisors prior to investing to review these implications in light of such investor’s particular circumstances. The sale of our Common Shares to any Plan is in no respect a representation by us that such an investment meets all relevant legal requirements with respect to investments by Plans generally or any particular Plan, or that such an investment is appropriate for Plans generally or any particular Plan. See also “Certain ERISA Considerations.”

Certain U.S. Tax Considerations

The following summary describes certain U.S. tax considerations relating to the ownership of our Common Shares as of the date hereof by U.S. holders and non-U.S. holders (each as defined below). Except where noted, this summary deals only with Common Shares held as a capital asset and does not deal with special situations or

26

holders subject to special tax rules, such as those of dealers in securities or currencies, financial institutions, regulated investment companies, tax-exempt entities (except as described in “—Taxation of Tax-Exempt Holders of Our Common Shares” below), insurance companies, persons holding Common Shares as a part of a hedging, integrated, conversion or constructive sale transaction or a straddle, traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings, persons liable for alternative minimum tax, persons who are “foreign governments” within the meaning of Section 892 of the Code, investors in pass-through entities or U.S. holders of shares whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar. The effects of other U.S. federal tax laws, such as estate and gift tax laws, and any applicable state, local or foreign tax laws are not discussed herein. In addition, this summary does not address all U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to a holder’s particular circumstances, including the net investment income tax. Furthermore, the discussion below is based upon the provisions of the Code and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions thereunder as of the date hereof, and such authorities may be repealed, revoked or modified, possibly with retroactive effect, so as to result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below. No ruling on the U.S. federal, state, or local tax considerations relevant to our operation or to the purchase, ownership or disposition of our Common Shares has been requested from the IRS or other tax authority. It is possible that the IRS may assert or a court may sustain a position contrary to any of the tax consequences described below. The summary is also based upon the assumption that we and our subsidiaries and affiliated entities will operate in accordance with our and their applicable organizational documents.

The U.S. federal income tax treatment of holders of our Common Shares depends in some instances on determinations of fact and interpretations of complex provisions of U.S. federal income tax law for which no clear precedent or authority may be available. In addition, the tax consequences to any particular shareholder of holding our Common Shares will depend on the shareholder’s particular tax circumstances.

Our Taxation as a REIT

We intend to elect and qualify to be taxed as a REIT under the Code beginning with our taxable year ending December 31, 2024. Furthermore, we intend to operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Code so long as our Board of Trustees determines that REIT qualification remains in our best interest.

The sections of the Code and the corresponding regulations that govern the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a REIT and its shareholders are highly technical and complex. The following discussion is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Code provisions, rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and administrative interpretations thereof.

REITs in General

As indicated above, our qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various qualification requirements imposed upon REITs by the Code. The material qualification requirements are summarized below under “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT.” While we intend to operate so that we qualify as a REIT, the IRS may challenge our qualification, or we may not be able to operate in accordance with the REIT requirements in the future. See “—Failure to Qualify.”

Provided that we qualify as a REIT, generally we will be entitled to a deduction for dividends that we pay and therefore will not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our REIT taxable income that is currently distributed to our shareholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” at the corporate and shareholder levels that generally results from an investment in a C corporation (i.e., a corporation generally subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax). Double taxation means taxation once at the corporate level when income is earned and once again at the shareholder level when the income is distributed. In general, the income that we generate, to the extent declared as a dividend and subsequently paid to our shareholders, is taxed only at the shareholder level.

27

If we qualify as a REIT, we will nonetheless be subject to U.S. federal tax or penalties in the following circumstances:

• We will pay U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income, including net capital gain, that we do not distribute (or are deemed to distribute) to shareholders during, or within a specified time after, the calendar year in which the income is earned.

• If we have net income from “prohibited transactions,” which are, in general, sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, other than foreclosure property, such income will be subject to a 100% tax.

• If we elect to treat property that we acquire in connection with a foreclosure of a mortgage loan or from certain leasehold terminations as “foreclosure property,” we may thereby avoid (a) the 100% tax on gain from a resale of that property (if the sale would otherwise constitute a prohibited transaction) and (b) the inclusion of any income from such property not qualifying for purposes of the REIT gross income tests discussed below, but the income from the sale or operation of the property may be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax.

• If due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect we fail to satisfy either the 75% Gross Income Test or the 95% Gross Income Test discussed below, but nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because other requirements are met, we will be subject to a 100% tax on the greater of the amount by which we fail the 75% Gross Income Test or the 95% Gross Income Test, multiplied in either case by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.

• If (i) we fail to satisfy the asset tests (other than a de minimis failure of the 5% Value Test, 10% Vote Test or 10% Value Test, as described below under “—Asset Tests”) due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, (ii) we dispose of the assets or otherwise comply with such asset tests within six months after the last day of the quarter in which we identify such failure and (iii) we file a schedule with the IRS describing the assets that caused such failure, we will pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the net income from the nonqualifying assets during the period in which we failed to satisfy such asset tests multiplied by the highest U.S. federal corporate income tax rate.

• If we fail to satisfy one or more requirements for REIT qualification, other than the gross income tests and the asset tests, and the failure was due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, we will be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure.

• We may be required to pay monetary penalties to the IRS in certain circumstances, including if we fail to meet recordkeeping requirements intended to monitor our compliance with rules relating to the composition of a REIT’s shareholders, as described below in “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT.”

• If we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of:

• 85% of our ordinary income for such calendar year;

• 95% of our capital gain net income for such calendar year; and

• any undistributed taxable income from prior taxable years, we will pay a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the amount we actually distributed, plus any retained amounts on which income tax has been paid at the corporate level.

• We may elect to retain and pay income tax on our net long-term capital gain. In that case, a U.S. holder would include its proportionate share of our undistributed long-term capital gain (to the extent we make a timely designation of such gain to the shareholder) in its income, and would receive a credit or a refund for its proportionate share of the tax we paid.

• We will be subject to a 100% excise tax on amounts received by us from a taxable REIT subsidiary (a “TRS”) (or on certain expenses deducted by a TRS) if certain arrangements between us and a TRS of ours, as further described below, are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties.

28

• If we acquire any assets from a non-REIT C corporation in a carry-over basis transaction, we could be liable for specified tax liabilities inherited from that non-REIT C corporation with respect to that corporation’s “built-in gain” in its assets. Built-in gain is the amount by which an asset’s fair market value exceeds its adjusted tax basis at the time we acquire the asset. Applicable Treasury regulations, however, allow us to avoid the recognition of gain and the imposition of corporate-level tax with respect to a built-in gain asset acquired in a carry-over basis transaction from a non-REIT C corporation unless and until we dispose of that built-in gain asset during the 5-year period following its acquisition, at which time we would recognize, and would be subject to tax at the regular U.S. federal corporate income tax rate on, the built-in gain.

• We will generally be subject to tax on the portion of any “excess inclusion income” derived from an investment in residual interests in real estate mortgage investment conduits (“REMICs”) that is allocable to any of our shareholders that are “disqualified organizations.” Similar rules will apply if we own an equity interest in a taxable mortgage pool. To the extent that we own a REMIC residual interest or a taxable mortgage pool through a TRS, we will not be subject to this tax, but the TRS would be taxable on the excess inclusion income. For a discussion of “excess inclusion income,” see “—Taxable Mortgage Pools.”

In addition, notwithstanding our status as a REIT, we may also have to pay certain state and local income taxes, because not all states and localities treat REITs in the same manner that they are treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Moreover, as further described below, any domestic TRS in which we own an interest will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its net income.

Requirements for Qualification as a REIT. The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:

(1) that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;

(2) the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest;

(3) that would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for its election to be subject to tax as a REIT;

(4) that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to certain provisions of the Code;

(5) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons;

(6) of which not more than 50% in value of the outstanding shares are owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) after applying certain attribution rules;

(7) that makes an election to be a REIT for the current taxable year or has made such an election for a previous taxable year, which has not been terminated or revoked; and

(8) that meets other tests described below regarding the nature of its income and assets.

Conditions (1) through (4), inclusive, must be met during the entire taxable year. Condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. Condition (6) must be met during the last half of each taxable year, but neither conditions (5) nor (6) apply to the first taxable year for which an election to be taxed as a REIT is made. We believe that we will maintain sufficient diversity of ownership to allow us to satisfy conditions (5) and (6) above. In addition, our Declaration of Trust contains restrictions regarding the ownership and transfer of our shares that are intended to assist us in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in (6) above. These restrictions, however, may not ensure that we will be able to satisfy these share ownership requirements. If we fail to satisfy these share ownership requirements, we will fail to qualify as a REIT.

If we comply with regulatory rules pursuant to which we are required to send annual letters to holders of our Common Shares requesting information regarding the actual ownership of our Common Shares (as discussed

29

below), and we do not know, or exercising reasonable diligence would not have known, whether we failed to meet requirement (6) above, we will be treated as having met such requirement.

To monitor compliance with the share ownership requirements, we generally are required to maintain records regarding the actual ownership of our Common Shares. To do so, we must demand written statements each year from the record holders of significant percentages of our Common Shares pursuant to which the record holders must disclose the actual owners of our Common Shares (i.e., the persons required to include our dividends in their gross income). We must maintain a list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand as part of our records. We could be subject to monetary penalties if we fail to comply with these record-keeping requirements. If you fail or refuse to comply with the demands, you will be required by Treasury regulations to submit a statement with your tax return disclosing your actual ownership of our Common Shares and other information. In addition, we must satisfy all relevant filing and other administrative requirements established by the IRS to maintain REIT status, use a calendar year for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and comply with the record keeping requirements of the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder.

Ownership of Partnership Interests. In the case of a REIT that is a partner in an entity that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Treasury regulations provide that the REIT is deemed to own its proportionate share of the partnership’s assets and to earn its proportionate share of the partnership’s gross income based on its pro rata share of capital interests in the partnership for purposes of the asset and gross income tests applicable to REITs, as described below. However, solely for purposes of the 10% Value Test described below (see “—Asset Tests”), the determination of a REIT’s interest in a partnership’s assets will be based on the REIT’s proportionate interest in any securities issued by the partnership, excluding for these purposes certain excluded securities as described in the Code. In addition, the assets and gross income of the partnership generally are deemed to retain the same character in the hands of the REIT. Thus, our proportionate share of the assets and items of income of partnerships in which we own an equity interest is treated as assets and items of income of our company for purposes of applying the REIT requirements described below. Consequently, to the extent that we directly or indirectly hold a preferred or other equity interest in a partnership, the partnership’s assets and operations may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT, even though we may have no control or only limited influence over the partnership.

Disregarded Subsidiaries. If a REIT owns a corporate subsidiary that is a “qualified REIT subsidiary,” the separate existence of that subsidiary is disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Generally, a qualified REIT subsidiary is a corporation, other than a TRS, all of the stock of which is owned directly or indirectly by the REIT. Other entities that are wholly-owned by us, including single member limited liability companies that have not elected to be taxed as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes, are also generally disregarded as separate entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, including for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests. All assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of qualified REIT subsidiaries and disregarded subsidiaries will be treated as assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the REIT itself. A qualified REIT subsidiary of ours is not subject to U.S. federal corporate income taxation, although it may be subject to state and local taxation in some states.

In the event that a qualified REIT subsidiary or a disregarded subsidiary ceases to be wholly owned by us (for example, if any equity interest in the subsidiary is acquired by a person other than us or another disregarded subsidiary of us), the subsidiary’s separate existence would no longer be disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, it would have multiple owners and would be treated as either a partnership or a taxable corporation. Such an event could, depending on the circumstances, adversely affect our ability to satisfy the various asset and gross income tests applicable to REITs, including the requirement that REITs generally may not own, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the value or voting power of the outstanding securities of another corporation. See “—Asset Tests” and “—Gross Income Tests.”

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries. A TRS is an entity in which we directly or indirectly own stock that is taxable as a corporation and that elects with us to be treated as a TRS. The separate existence of a TRS is not ignored for

30

U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, a domestic TRS generally is subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its earnings, which may reduce the cash flow that we and our subsidiaries generate in the aggregate, and may reduce our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. In addition, if a TRS owns, directly or indirectly, securities representing 35% or more of the vote or value of a subsidiary corporation, that subsidiary will also be treated as a TRS. We generally may not own more than 10%, as measured by voting power or value, of the securities of a corporation that is not a qualified REIT subsidiary unless we and such corporation elect to treat such corporation as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs.

Income earned by a TRS is not attributable to the REIT. Rather, the stock issued by a TRS to us is an asset in our hands, and we treat dividends paid to us from such TRS, if any, as income. This income can affect our income and asset tests calculations, as described below. As a result, income that might not be qualifying income for purposes of the income tests applicable to REITs could be earned by a TRS without affecting our status as a REIT. For example, we may use TRSs to perform services or conduct activities that give rise to certain categories of income such as management fees, or to conduct activities that, if conducted by us directly, would be treated in our hands as prohibited transactions.

Several provisions of the Code regarding the arrangements between a REIT and its TRSs ensure that a TRS will be subject to an appropriate level of U.S. federal income taxation. For example, a TRS is limited in its ability to deduct interest payments made to affiliated REITs. In addition, we would be obligated to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that we receive from, or on certain expenses deducted by, a TRS if the IRS were to assert successfully that the economic arrangements between us and a TRS are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties.

Deductions are disallowed for business interest expense (even if paid to third parties) in excess of the sum of a taxpayer’s business interest income and 30% of the adjusted taxable income of the business, which is its taxable income computed without regard to business interest income or expense, net operating losses or the pass-through income deduction. Such limitations may also impact the amount of U.S. federal income tax paid by any of our TRSs.

Taxable Mortgage Pools

An entity, or a portion of an entity, is classified as a taxable mortgage pool under the Code if:

• (i) substantially all of its assets consist of debt obligations or interests in debt obligations, and more than 50% of such debt obligations or interests in debt obligations are real estate mortgage loans or interests in real estate mortgage loans as of specified testing dates;

• (ii) the entity has issued debt obligations that have two or more maturities; and

• (iii) the payments required to be made by the entity on the debt obligations described in clause (ii) above “bear a relationship” to the payments to be received by the entity on the debt obligations or interests in debt obligations described in clause (i) above.

Under the Treasury regulations, if less than 80% of the assets of an entity (or a portion of an entity) consist of debt obligations (or interests therein), these debt obligations (or interests therein) are considered not to comprise “substantially all” of its assets, and therefore the entity would not be treated as a taxable mortgage pool.

A taxable mortgage pool generally is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, special rules apply to a REIT, a portion of a REIT, or a qualified REIT subsidiary that is a taxable mortgage pool. If a REIT owns directly, or indirectly through one or more qualified REIT subsidiaries or other entities that are disregarded as a separate entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, 100% of the equity

31

interests in the taxable mortgage pool, the taxable mortgage pool will be a qualified REIT subsidiary and, therefore, disregarded as an entity separate from the REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes and would not generally affect the tax qualification of the REIT.

If a REIT is a taxable mortgage pool, or if a REIT owns all of the equity interests in a taxable mortgage pool (in which case the taxable mortgage pool would be treated as a qualified REIT subsidiary), then a portion of the REIT’s income may be treated as excess inclusion income and a portion of the distributions the REIT makes to its shareholders may be considered to be excess inclusion income. A shareholder’s share of excess inclusion income (a) cannot be offset by any losses otherwise available to the shareholder, (b) in the case of a shareholder that is a REIT, a RIC or a common trust fund or other pass through entity, would be considered excess inclusion income of such entity, (c) would be subject to tax as unrelated business taxable income in the hands of most tax-exempt shareholders, (d) would result in the application of U.S. federal income tax withholding at the maximum rate (30%), without reduction for any otherwise applicable income tax treaty, to the extent allocable to non-U.S. holders, and (e) would be taxable (at the highest corporate tax rates) to the REIT, rather than its shareholders, to the extent allocable to the REIT’s stock held in record name by disqualified organizations (generally, tax-exempt entities not subject to unrelated business income tax, including governmental organizations). Nominees or other broker-dealers who hold the REIT’s stock on behalf of disqualified organizations would be subject to this tax on the portion of the REIT’s excess inclusion income allocable to the REIT’s stock held on behalf of disqualified organizations. A REIT’s excess inclusion income will be allocated among its shareholders in proportion of its dividends paid. The manner in which excess inclusion income would be allocated among shares of different classes of stock is not clear under the current law. Tax-exempt investors, RIC or REIT investors, non-U.S. investors and taxpayers with net operating losses should consult with their tax advisors with respect to excess inclusion income.

Gross Income Tests

To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy two gross income requirements, each of which is applied on an annual basis. First, at least 75% of our gross income, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions and certain hedging and foreign currency transactions, for each taxable year generally must be derived directly or indirectly from:

• rents from real property;

• interest on debt secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property;

• dividends or other distributions on, and gain from the sale of, stock in other REITs;

• gain from the sale of real property or mortgage loans;

• abatements and refunds of taxes on real property;

• income and gain derived from foreclosure property (as described below);

• amounts (other than amounts the determination of which depends in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person) received or accrued as consideration for entering into agreements (i) to make loans secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property or (ii) to purchase or lease real property (including interests in real property and interests in mortgages on real property); and

• interest or dividend income from investments in stock or debt instruments attributable to the temporary investment of new capital during the one-year period following our receipt of new capital that we raise through equity offerings or public offerings of debt obligations with at least a five-year term (the “75% Gross Income Test”).

Second, at least 95% of our gross income, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions and certain hedging transactions, for each taxable year must be derived from sources that qualify for purposes of the 75%

32

Gross Income Test, and from (i) dividends, (ii) interest and (iii) gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, which need not have any relation to real property (the “95% Gross Income Test”).

If we fail to satisfy the 75% Gross Income Test or the 95% Gross Income Test (or both) for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for that year if we are entitled to relief under the Code. These relief provisions generally will be available if our failure to meet the tests is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, and we attach a schedule of the sources of our income to our U.S. federal income tax return. It is not possible, however, to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. For example, if we fail to satisfy the gross income tests because nonqualifying income that we intentionally recognize exceeds the limits on nonqualifying income, the IRS could conclude that the failure to satisfy the tests was not due to reasonable cause. If these relief provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances, we will fail to qualify as a REIT. Even if these relief provisions apply, a penalty tax would be imposed based on the amount of nonqualifying income. See “—REITs in General.”

Gross income from our sale of property that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is excluded from both the numerator and the denominator in both gross income tests. In addition, certain foreign currency gains will be excluded from gross income for purposes of the gross income tests. We intend to monitor the amount of our nonqualifying income and manage our portfolio to comply at all times with the gross income tests. The following paragraphs discuss some of the specific applications of the gross income tests to us.

Dividends. We may directly or indirectly receive distributions from TRSs or other corporations that are not REITs or qualified REIT subsidiaries. These distributions generally are treated as dividend income to the extent of earnings and profits of the distributing corporation. Our dividend income from stock in any corporation (other than any REIT), including any TRS, will be qualifying income for purposes of the 95% Gross Income Test, but not the 75% Gross Income Test. Dividends that we receive from any REITs in which we own stock and our gain on the sale of the stock in those REITs will be qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests. However, if a REIT in which we own stock fails to qualify as a REIT in any year, our income from such REIT would be qualifying income for purposes of the 95% Gross Income Test, but not the 75% Gross Income Test.

Interest. The term “interest,” as defined for purposes of both gross income tests, generally excludes any amount that is based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person; however, it generally includes the following: (i) an amount that is received or accrued based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales, and (ii) an amount that is based on the income or profits of a debtor, as long as the debtor derives substantially all of its income from the real property securing the debt by leasing substantially all of its interest in the property, and only to the extent that the amounts received by the debtor would be qualifying “rents from real property” if received directly by a REIT.

Interest on debt secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property (including, for this purpose, prepayment penalties, loan assumption fees and late payment charges that are not compensation for services) generally is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% Gross Income Test. However, if the highest principal amount of a loan outstanding during a taxable year exceeds the fair market value of the real property securing the loan as of the date we agreed to originate or acquire the loan, a portion of the interest income from such loan will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% Gross Income Test but will be qualifying income for purposes of the 95% Gross Income Test. The portion of the interest income that will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% Gross Income Test will be equal to the portion of the principal amount of the loan that is not secured by real property—that is, the amount by which the loan exceeds the value of the real estate that is security for the loan.

We expect that the CMBS in which we invest generally will be treated either as interests in a grantor trust or as interests in a REMIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes and that all interest income from such CMBS will

33

be qualifying income for the 95% Gross Income Test. In the case of CMBS treated as interests in grantor trusts, we would be treated as owning an undivided beneficial ownership interest in the mortgage loans held by the grantor trust. The interest on such mortgage loans would be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% Gross Income Test to the extent that the obligation is secured by real property, as discussed above. In the case of CMBS treated as interests in a REMIC, income derived from REMIC interests will generally be treated as qualifying income for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests. If less than 95% of the assets of the REMIC are real estate assets, however, then only a proportionate part of our interest in the REMIC and income derived from the interest will qualify for purposes of the 75% Gross Income Test. In addition, some REMIC securitizations include imbedded interest swap or cap contracts or other derivative instruments that potentially could produce nonqualifying income for the holder of the related REMIC securities.

Also among the assets we may hold are mezzanine loans, i.e. subordinated loans secured by equity interests in a pass-through entity that directly or indirectly owns real property, rather than a direct mortgage on the real property. Revenue Procedure 2003-65 provides a safe harbor pursuant to which a mezzanine loan, if it meets each of the requirements contained in the Revenue Procedure, will be treated by the IRS as a real estate asset for purposes of the asset tests (as described below), and interest derived from it will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the 75% Gross Income Test. Although the Revenue Procedure provides a safe harbor on which taxpayers may rely, it does not prescribe rules of substantive tax law. The mezzanine loans that we acquire may not meet all of the requirements for reliance on this safe harbor. Hence, the IRS may challenge the qualification of such assets as real estate assets for purposes of the asset tests or the interest generated by these loans as qualifying income under the 75% Gross Income Test. To the extent we make corporate mezzanine loans, such loans will not qualify as real estate assets and interest income with respect to such loans will not be qualifying income for the 75% Gross Income Test (described above).

We believe that substantially all of our income from our mortgage-related securities generally will be qualifying income for purposes of the gross income tests. However, to the extent that we own non-REMIC collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) or other debt instruments secured by mortgage loans (rather than by real property), or secured by non-real estate assets, or debt securities that are not secured by mortgages on real property or interests in real property (including CLOs), the interest income received with respect to such securities generally will be qualifying income for purposes of the 95% Gross Income Test, but not the 75% Gross Income Test.

Hedging Transactions. We and our subsidiaries may enter into hedging transactions with respect to one or more of our assets or liabilities. Hedging transactions could take a variety of forms, including interest rate swap agreements, interest rate cap agreements, options, futures contracts, forward rate agreements or similar financial instruments. Except to the extent provided by Treasury regulations, any income from a hedging transaction we enter into (i) in the normal course of our business primarily to manage risk of interest rate or price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, to acquire or carry real estate assets, which is clearly identified as a hedge along with the risk that it hedges within prescribed time periods specified in Treasury regulations, (ii) primarily to manage risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that would be qualifying income under the 75% or 95% gross income tests which is clearly identified as a hedge along with the risk that it hedges within prescribed time periods, or (iii) in connection with the effective termination of certain hedging transactions described above will be excluded from gross income for purposes of both the 75% or 95% gross income tests. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as nonqualifying income for purposes of both of the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Moreover, to the extent that a position in a hedging transaction has positive value at any particular point in time, it may be treated as an asset that does not qualify for purposes of the asset tests described below. We intend to structure any hedging transactions in a manner that does not jeopardize our qualification as a REIT. Our hedging activities may give rise to income or assets that do not qualify for purposes of the REIT tests and may adversely affect our ability to satisfy the REIT qualification requirements.

34

We may conduct some or all of our hedging activities through a TRS or other corporate entity, the income of which may be subject to U.S. federal income tax, rather than by participating in the arrangements directly or through pass-through subsidiaries.

Fee Income. Any fee income that we earn will generally not be qualifying income for purposes of either gross income test. Any fees earned by a TRS will not be included for purposes of the gross income tests.

Rents from Real Property. To the extent that we own any real property (or interests therein), rents we receive will qualify as “rents from real property” in satisfying the gross income requirements for a REIT described above only if several conditions described below are met. These conditions relate to the identity of the tenant, the computation of the rent payable, and the nature of the property leased and any services provided in connection with the property. First, the amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, an amount received or accrued generally will not be excluded from rents from real property solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales. Second, rents we receive from a “related party tenant” will not qualify as rents from real property in satisfying the gross income tests unless the tenant is a TRS, at least 90% of the property is leased to unrelated tenants, the rent paid by the TRS is substantially comparable to the rent paid by the unrelated tenants for comparable space and the rent is not attributable to an increase in rent due to a modification of a lease with a “controlled taxable REIT subsidiary” (i.e., a TRS in which we own directly or indirectly more than 50% of the voting power or value of the stock). A tenant is a related party tenant if the REIT, or an actual or constructive owner of 10% or more of the REIT, actually or constructively owns 10% or more of the tenant. Whether rents paid by a TRS are substantially comparable to rents paid by other tenants is determined at the time the lease with the TRS is entered into, extended, or modified, if such modification increases the rents due under such lease. Third, if rent attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property is greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease, then the portion of rent attributable to the personal property will not qualify as rents from real property. Finally, for rents to qualify as “rents from real property” for purposes of the gross income tests, we are only allowed to provide services that are both usually or “customarily rendered” in connection with the rental of real property and not otherwise considered “rendered to the occupant” of the property. Examples of these permitted services include the provision of light, heat, or other utilities, trash removal and general maintenance of common areas. We may, however, render services to our tenants through an “independent contractor” who is adequately compensated and from whom we do not derive revenue if certain requirements are satisfied. We may also own an interest in a TRS which provides non-customary services to tenants without tainting our rental income from the related properties.

Even if a REIT furnishes or renders services that are non-customary with respect to a property, if the greater of (i) the amounts received or accrued, directly or indirectly, or deemed received by the REIT with respect to such services, or (ii) 150% of our direct cost in furnishing or rendering the services during a taxable year is not more than 1% of all amounts received or accrued, directly or indirectly, by the REIT with respect to the property during the same taxable year, then only the amounts with respect to such non-customary services are not treated as rent for purposes of the REIT gross income tests.

We intend to cause any services that are not usually or “customarily rendered,” or that are for the benefit of a particular tenant in connection with the rental of real property, to be provided through a TRS or through an “independent contractor” who is adequately compensated and from which we do not derive revenue, and which meets certain other requirements. However, the IRS may not concur with our determination as to whether a particular service is usual or customary, or otherwise in this regard.

Prohibited Transactions Tax. A REIT will incur a 100% tax on the net income derived from any sale or other disposition of property, other than foreclosure property, that the REIT holds primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Whether a REIT holds an asset primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business depends, however, on the facts and circumstances in effect from time to time, including those related to a particular asset. While we intend to conduct our operations so that no asset that

35

we own (or are treated as owning) will be treated as, or as having been, held for sale to customers, and that a sale of any such asset will not be treated as having been in the ordinary course of our business, we cannot assure you that we will comply with certain safe harbor provisions or that we will avoid owning property that may be characterized as property that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. The 100% tax will not apply to gains from the sale of property that is held through a TRS or other taxable corporation, although such income will be subject to tax in the hands of such corporation at regular corporate income tax rates. We intend to structure our activities to avoid prohibited transaction characterization.

Foreclosure Property. Foreclosure property is any real property, including interests in real property, and any personal property incident to such real property:

• that is acquired by a REIT as the result of the REIT having bid in such property at foreclosure, or having otherwise reduced such property to ownership or possession by agreement or process of law, after there was a default or default was imminent on a lease of such property or on indebtedness that such property secured;

• for which the related loan was acquired by the REIT at a time when the default was not imminent or anticipated; and

• for which the REIT makes a proper election to treat the property as foreclosure property.

However, a REIT will not be considered to have foreclosed on a property where the REIT takes control of the property as a mortgagee-in-possession and cannot receive any profit or sustain any loss except as a creditor of the mortgagor.

Property generally ceases to be foreclosure property at the end of the third taxable year following the taxable year in which the REIT acquired the property, or longer if an extension is granted by the Secretary of the Treasury. This grace period terminates and foreclosure property ceases to be foreclosure property on the first day:

• on which a lease is entered into for the property that, by its terms, will give rise to income that does not qualify for purposes of the 75% Gross Income Test, or any amount is received or accrued, directly or indirectly, pursuant to a lease entered into on or after such day that will give rise to income that does not qualify for purposes of the 75% Gross Income Test;

• on which any construction takes place on the property, other than completion of a building or any other improvement, if more than 10% of the construction was completed before default became imminent; or

• which is more than 90 days after the day on which the REIT acquired the property and the property is used in a trade or business that is conducted by the REIT, other than through an independent contractor from whom the REIT itself does not derive or receive any income.

We will be subject to tax at the highest U.S. federal corporate income tax rate on any income from foreclosure property, including gain from the disposition of the foreclosure property, other than income that otherwise would be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% Gross Income Test, less expenses directly connected with the production of that income. However, net income from foreclosure property, including gain from the sale of foreclosure property held for sale in the ordinary course of a trade or business, will qualify for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Any gain from the sale of property for which a foreclosure property election has been made will not be subject to the 100% tax on gains from prohibited transactions described above, even if the property would otherwise constitute inventory or dealer property.

Phantom Income. Due to the nature of the assets in which we will invest, we may be required to recognize taxable income from certain assets in advance of our receipt of cash flow from or proceeds from disposition of such assets, and may be required to report taxable income that exceeds the economic income ultimately realized on such assets.

36

We may acquire debt instruments in the secondary market for less than their face amount. The amount of such discount generally will be treated as “market discount” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accrued market discount is reported as income when, and to the extent that, any payment of principal of the debt instrument is made, unless we elect to include accrued market discount in income as it accrues. Principal payments on certain debt instruments may be made monthly, and consequently accrued market discount may have to be included in income each month as if the debt instrument were assured of ultimately being collected in full. If we collect less on the debt instrument than our purchase price plus the market discount we had previously reported as income, we may not be able to benefit from any offsetting loss deductions.

The terms of the debt instruments that we hold may be modified under certain circumstances. These modifications may be considered “significant modifications” for U.S. federal income tax purposes that give rise to a deemed debt-for-debt exchange upon which we may recognize taxable income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash.

Some of the debt securities that we acquire may have been issued with original issue discount. In general, we will be required to accrue non-de minimis original issue discount based on the constant yield to maturity of such debt securities, and to treat it as taxable income in accordance with applicable U.S. federal income tax rules even though such yield may exceed cash payments, if any, received on such debt instrument.

In addition, in the event that any debt instruments or debt securities acquired by us are delinquent as to mandatory principal and interest payments, or in the event payments with respect to a particular debt instrument are not made when due, we may nonetheless be required to continue to recognize the unpaid interest as taxable income. Similarly, we may be required to accrue interest income with respect to subordinated mortgage-backed securities at the stated rate regardless of whether corresponding cash payments are received.

Finally, we may be required under the terms of indebtedness that we incur to use cash received from interest payments to make principal payments on that indebtedness, with the effect of recognizing income but not having a corresponding amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

As a result of each of these potential timing differences between income recognition or expense deduction and cash receipts or disbursements, there is a risk that we may have taxable income in excess of cash available for distribution. In that event, we may need to borrow funds or take other action to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements for the taxable year in which this “phantom income” is recognized. See “—Annual Distribution Requirements Applicable to REITs.”

Asset Tests

At the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must satisfy the following tests relating to the nature of our assets:

• At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by the following:

• interests in real property, including leaseholds and options to acquire real property and leaseholds;

• interests in mortgages on real property;

• stock in other REITs and debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs;

• cash and cash items (including certain receivables);

• government securities;

• investments in stock or debt instruments attributable to the temporary investment of new capital during the one-year period following our receipt of new capital that we raise through equity offerings or public offerings of debt obligations with at least a five-year term; and

37

• regular or residual interests in a REMIC. However, if less than 95% of the assets of a REMIC consists of assets that are qualifying real estate-related assets under U.S. federal income tax laws, determined as if we held such assets directly, we will be treated as holding directly our proportionate share of the assets of such REMIC (the “75% Asset Test”).

• Not more than 25% of our total assets may be represented by securities, other than those in the 75% asset class described above.

• Except for securities in TRSs and the securities in the 75% asset class described in the first bullet point above, the value of any one issuer’s securities owned by us may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets (the “5% Value Test”).

• Except for securities in TRSs and the securities in the 75% asset class described in the first bullet point above, we may not own more than 10% of any one issuer’s outstanding voting securities (the “10% Vote Test”).

• Except for securities of TRSs and the securities in the 75% asset class described in the first bullet point above, we may not own more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer, other than securities that qualify for the “straight debt” exception or other exceptions discussed below (the “10% Value Test”).

• Not more than 20% of the value of our total assets may be represented by the securities of one or more TRSs.

• Not more than 25% of the value of our total assets may be represented by nonqualified publicly offered REIT debt instruments.

Notwithstanding the general rule, as noted above, that for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests we are treated as owning our proportionate share of the underlying assets of a subsidiary partnership, if we hold indebtedness issued by such partnership, the indebtedness will be subject to, and may cause a violation of, the asset tests unless the indebtedness is a qualifying mortgage asset or other conditions are met. Similarly, although stock of another REIT is a qualifying asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, any non-mortgage debt that is issued by another REIT may not so qualify (although such debt will not be treated as “securities” for purposes of the 10% Value Test, as explained below).

Securities, for purposes of the asset tests, may include debt we hold from other issuers. However, debt we hold in an issuer that does not qualify for purposes of the 75% Asset Test will not be taken into account for purposes of the 10% Value Test if the debt securities meet the straight debt safe harbor. Subject to certain exceptions, debt will meet the “straight debt” safe harbor if the debt is a written unconditional promise to pay on demand or on a specified date a sum certain in money, the debt is not convertible, directly or indirectly, into stock, and the interest rate and the interest payment dates of the debt are not contingent on the profits of any person, the borrower’s discretion or similar factors. In the case of an issuer that is a corporation or a partnership, securities that otherwise would be considered straight debt will not be so considered if we, and any of our “controlled taxable REIT subsidiaries” as defined in the Code, hold any securities of the corporate or partnership issuer that (a) are not straight debt or other excluded securities (prior to the application of this rule), and (b) have an aggregate value greater than 1% of the issuer’s outstanding securities (including, in the case of a partnership issuer, our interest as a partner in the partnership).

In addition to straight debt, the Code provides that certain other securities will not violate the 10% Value Test. Such securities include (i) any loan made to an individual or an estate, (ii) certain rental agreements pursuant to which one or more payments are to be made in subsequent years (other than agreements between a REIT and certain persons related to the REIT under attribution rules), (iii) any obligation to pay rents from real property, (iv) securities issued by governmental entities that are not dependent in whole or in part on the profits of (or payments made by) a non-governmental entity, (v) any security (including debt securities) issued by another REIT and (vi) any debt instrument issued by a partnership if the partnership’s income is of such a nature

38

that the partnership would satisfy the 75% Gross Income Test described above under “ —Gross Income Tests.” In applying the 10% Value Test, a debt security issued by a partnership (other than straight debt or any other excluded security) is not taken into account to the extent, if any, of the REIT’s proportionate interest as a partner in that partnership.

Any stock that we hold or acquire in other REITs will be a qualifying asset for purposes of the 75% Asset Test. However, if a REIT in which we own stock fails to qualify as a REIT in any year, the stock in such REIT will not be a qualifying asset for purposes of the 75% Asset Test. Instead, we would be subject to the second, third, fourth, and fifth asset tests described above with respect to our investment in such a disqualified REIT. We will also be subject to those assets tests with respect to our investments in any non-REIT C corporations for which we do not make a TRS election.

We may hold certain mezzanine loans that do not qualify for the safe harbor in Revenue Procedure 2003-65 discussed above pursuant to which certain loans secured by a first priority security interest in equity interests in a pass-through entity that directly or indirectly own real property will be treated as qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% Asset Test and therefore not be subject to the 10% Vote Test or 10% Value Test. In addition, such mezzanine loans may not qualify as “straight debt” securities or for one of the other exclusions from the definition of “securities” for purposes of the 10% Value Test. We intend to make any such investments in such a manner as not to fail the asset tests described above, but we may not be successful in this regard.

We may hold certain participation interests, including B Notes, in mortgage loans and mezzanine loans originated by other lenders. B Notes are interests in underlying loans created by virtue of participations or similar agreements to which the originators of the loans are parties, along with one or more participants. The borrower on the underlying loan is typically not a party to the participation agreement. The performance of this investment depends upon the performance of the underlying loan, and if the underlying borrower defaults, the participant typically has no recourse against the originator of the loan. The originator often retains a senior position in the underlying loan and grants junior participations which absorb losses first in the event of a default by the borrower. We generally expect to treat our participation interests in mortgage loans and mezzanine loans that qualify for safe harbor under Revenue Procedure 2003-65 as qualifying real estate assets for purposes of the asset tests and interest that we derive from such investments as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the 75% Gross Income Test discussed above. The appropriate treatment of participation interests for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not entirely certain, however, and the IRS may challenge our treatment of our participation interests. In the event of a determination that such participation interests do not qualify as real estate assets, or that the income that we derive from such participation interests does not qualify as mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT asset and income tests, we could be subject to a penalty tax, or could fail to qualify as a REIT.

We expect that the assets and mortgage-related securities that we own generally will be qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% Asset Test. However, to the extent that we own non-REMIC CMOs or other debt instruments secured by mortgage loans (rather than by real property) or secured by non-real estate assets, or debt securities issued by C corporations that are not secured by mortgages on real property, those securities will not be qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% Asset Test.

In addition, we may enter into repurchase agreements under which we will nominally sell certain of our assets to a counterparty and simultaneously enter into an agreement to repurchase the sold assets. We believe that we will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as the owner of the assets that are the subject of any such repurchase agreement and the repurchase agreement will be treated as a secured lending transaction notwithstanding that we may transfer record ownership of the assets to the counterparty during the term of the agreement. It is possible, however, that the IRS could assert that we did not own the assets during the term of the repurchase agreement, in which case we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

We intend to monitor the status of our assets for purposes of the various asset tests and manage our portfolio to comply at all times with such tests. However, we may not be successful in this effort. Independent appraisals

39

may not have been obtained to support our conclusions as to the value of our total assets or the value of any particular security or securities. Moreover, the values of some assets may not be susceptible to a precise determination, and values are subject to change in the future. Furthermore, the proper classification of an instrument as debt or equity for U.S. federal income tax purposes may be uncertain in some circumstances, which could affect the application of the REIT asset requirements. Accordingly, the IRS may contend that our interests in our subsidiaries or in the securities of other issuers cause a violation of the REIT asset tests.

However, certain relief provisions are available to allow REITs to satisfy the asset requirements or to maintain REIT qualification notwithstanding certain violations of the asset and other requirements. For example, if we failed to satisfy the asset tests at the end of a calendar quarter, such a failure would not cause us to lose our REIT qualification if (i) we satisfied the asset tests at the close of the preceding calendar quarter and (ii) the discrepancy between the value of our assets and the asset requirements was not wholly or partly caused by an acquisition of nonqualifying assets, but instead arose from changes in the relative market values of our assets. If the condition described in (ii) were not satisfied, we could nevertheless avoid disqualification by eliminating any discrepancy within 30 days after the close of the calendar quarter in which it arose or by making use of the relief provisions described above.

In the case of de minimis violations of the 10% Vote Test, 10% Value Test or the 5% Value Test, a REIT may maintain its qualification despite a violation of such requirements if (i) the value of the assets causing the violation does not exceed the lesser of 1% of the REIT’s total assets and $10,000,000 and (ii) the REIT either disposes of the assets causing the failure within six months after the last day of the quarter in which it identifies the failure, or the relevant tests are otherwise satisfied within that time frame.

Even if we did not qualify for the foregoing relief provisions, a REIT which fails one or more of the asset requirements for a particular tax quarter may nevertheless maintain its REIT qualification if (i) the REIT provides the IRS with a description of each asset causing the failure, (ii) the failure is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, (iii) the REIT pays a tax equal to the greater of (a) $50,000 per failure and (b) the product of the net income generated by the assets that caused the failure multiplied by the highest U.S. federal corporate income tax rate and (iv) the REIT either disposes of the assets causing the failure within six months after the last day of the quarter in which it identifies the failure, or otherwise satisfies the relevant tests within that time frame.

Annual Distribution Requirements Applicable to REITs

To qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally must distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to our shareholders in an amount at least equal to:

• the sum of (i) 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain and (ii) 90% of our net income after tax, if any, from foreclosure property; minus

• the excess of the sum of specified items of non-cash income (including original issue discount on our mortgage loans) over 5% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain.

Distributions generally must be made during the taxable year to which they relate. Distributions may be made in the following year in two circumstances. First, if we declare a dividend in October, November or December of any year with a record date in one of these months and pay the dividend on or before January 31 of the following year, we will be treated as having paid the dividend on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared. Second, distributions may be made in the following year if the dividends are declared before we timely file our tax return for the year and if made before the first regular dividend payment made after such declaration; these distributions are taxable to our shareholders in the year in which paid, even though the distributions relate to our prior taxable year for purposes of the 90% distribution requirement. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or we distribute at least 90%, but less than 100% of our REIT

40

taxable income, as adjusted, we will be subject to tax on the undistributed amount at regular U.S. federal corporate income tax rates.

To the extent that in the future we may have available net operating losses carried forward from prior tax years, such losses may reduce the amount of distributions that we must make in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. Such losses, however, will generally not affect the tax treatment to our shareholders of any distributions that are actually made.

If we fail to distribute during a calendar year (or, in the case of distributions with declaration and record dates falling in the last three months of the calendar year, by the end of January following such calendar year) at least the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for such year, (ii) 95% of our capital gain net income for such year and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from prior years, we will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the sum of (x) the amounts actually distributed (taking into account excess distributions from prior years) and (y) the amounts of income retained on which we have paid corporate income tax.

Although several types of non-cash income are excluded in determining the annual distribution requirement, we will incur corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax with respect to those non-cash income items if we do not distribute those items on a current basis. As a result of the foregoing, we may not have sufficient cash to distribute all of our taxable income and thereby avoid corporate income tax and the excise tax imposed on certain undistributed income. In such a situation, we may need to borrow funds or issue additional shares.

We may elect to retain rather than distribute all or a portion of our net capital gains and pay the tax on such gains. In that case, our shareholders must include their proportionate share of the undistributed net capital gains in income as long-term capital gains and will receive a credit or refund for their share of the tax paid by us to the extent it exceeds their tax liability on the undistributed capital gain. Our shareholders would then increase the adjusted basis of their shares by the difference between (i) the amount of capital gain dividends that we designated and that they include in their taxable income, and (ii) the tax that we paid on their behalf with respect to that income. For purposes of the 4% excise tax described above, any retained amounts for which we elect this treatment would be treated as having been distributed.

We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy the distribution requirements. However, it is possible that, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet the distribution requirements, in which case it may be necessary to borrow funds or make non-cash distributions (including, for example, distributions of our own shares) in order to satisfy the distribution requirements.

If our taxable income for a particular year is subsequently determined to have been understated, under some circumstances we may be able to rectify a failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying deficiency dividends to shareholders in a later year, which may be included in our deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. Thus, we may be able to avoid being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends. However, we will be required to pay interest based upon the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividends.

Penalty Tax

Any redetermined rents, redetermined deductions, excess interest or redetermined TRS service income we generate will be subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, redetermined rents are rents from real property that are overstated as a result of any services furnished to any of our tenants by a TRS, and redetermined deductions and excess interest represent any amounts that are deducted by a TRS for amounts paid to us that are in excess of the amounts that would have been deducted based on arm’s-length negotiations. Rents that we receive will not constitute redetermined rents if they qualify for certain safe harbor provisions contained in the Code.

41

Redetermined TRS service income is income earned by a TRS that is attributable to services provided to us, or on our behalf to any of our tenants, that is less than the amounts that would have been charged based upon arms’ length negotiations.

Record Keeping Requirements

We are required to comply with applicable record keeping requirements. Failure to comply could result in monetary fines. For example, we must request on an annual basis information from our shareholders designed to disclose the actual ownership of our outstanding Common Shares.

Failure to Qualify

If we fail to satisfy one or more requirements of REIT qualification, other than the income tests or asset requirements, then we may still retain REIT qualification if the failure is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, and we pay a penalty of $50,000 for each failure.

If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year and the relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax on our taxable income as a corporation. This would significantly reduce both our cash available for distribution to our shareholders and our earnings. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will not be required to make any distributions to shareholders and any distributions that are made will not be deductible by us. Moreover, all distributions to shareholders would be taxable as dividends to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, whether or not attributable to capital gains of ours. Furthermore, subject to certain limitations in the Code, corporate distributees may be eligible for the dividends received deduction with respect to those distributions, and individual, trust and estate distributees may be eligible for reduced U.S. federal income tax rates on such dividends. Unless we are entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we also will be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost.

Tax Aspects of any Subsidiary Partnerships

General. We may hold certain investments indirectly through subsidiary partnerships and limited liability companies which are treated as partnerships or disregarded entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In general, entities that are treated as partnerships or disregarded entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes are “pass-through” entities which are not required to pay U.S. federal income tax. Rather, partners or members of such entities are allocated their shares of the items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit of the partnership or limited liability company, and are potentially required to pay tax on this income, without regard to whether they receive a distribution from the partnership or limited liability company. A partner in such entity that is a REIT will include in its income its share of these partnership and limited liability company items for purposes of the various gross income tests, the computation of its REIT taxable income, and the REIT distribution requirements. Pursuant to these rules, for purposes of the asset tests, we will include our pro rata share of assets held by any subsidiary partnerships and limited liability companies, based on our capital interest in each such entity.

Entity Classification. Our interests in subsidiary partnerships and limited liability companies involve special tax considerations, including the possibility that the IRS might challenge the status of these entities as partnerships (or disregarded entities), as opposed to associations taxable as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For example, an entity that would otherwise be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes may nonetheless be taxable as a corporation if it is a “publicly traded partnership” (subject to certain exceptions). A partnership or limited liability company would be treated as a publicly traded partnership if its interests are traded on an established securities market or are readily tradable on a secondary market or a substantial equivalent thereof, within the meaning of applicable Treasury regulations. If a subsidiary partnership or limited liability company were treated as an association rather than as a partnership, it would be taxable as a

42

corporation and would be required to pay an entity-level tax on its income. In this situation, the character of our assets and items of gross income would change and could prevent us from qualifying as a REIT. See “—Failure to Qualify” for a discussion of the effects of our failure to meet the REIT asset and income tests. In addition, a change in the tax status of a subsidiary partnership or limited liability company might be treated as a taxable event. If so, we might incur a tax liability without any related cash distributions. We do not anticipate that any subsidiary partnership or limited liability company of ours will be treated as a publicly traded partnership which is taxable as a corporation.

U.S. federal income tax audits of partnerships, such as subsidiary partnerships or limited liability companies treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes are conducted at the entity level, but unless such an entity qualifies for and affirmatively elects an alternative procedure, any adjustments to the amount of tax due (including interest and penalties) will be payable by the entity itself. Under an alternative procedure, if elected, a partnership would issue information returns to persons who were partners in the audited year, who would then be required to take such adjustments into account in calculating their own tax liability, and the partnership would not be liable for the adjustments. If any of our subsidiary partnerships or limited liability companies is able to and in fact elects the alternative procedure for a given adjustment, the amount of taxes for which such persons will be liable will be increased by any applicable penalties and a special interest charge. Any such entities may not make such an election for any given adjustment.

Taxation of U.S. Holders of Our Common Shares

U.S. Holder. As used in the remainder of this discussion, the term “U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of our Common Shares that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

• a citizen or resident of the United States;

• a corporation (or an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any State thereof or the District of Columbia;

• an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

• a trust if it (i) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

If a partnership (or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds our Common Shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding Common Shares, you should consult your advisors. A “non-U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of our Common Shares that is neither a U.S. holder nor a partnership (or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes).

Distributions Generally. As long as we qualify as a REIT, distributions made by us to our taxable U.S. holders out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits that are not designated as capital gain dividends or “qualified dividend income” will be taken into account by them as ordinary income taxable at ordinary income tax rates and will not qualify for the reduced capital gains rates that currently generally apply to distributions by non-REIT C corporations to certain non-corporate U.S. holders. In determining the extent to which a distribution constitutes a dividend for tax purposes, our earnings and profits will be allocated first to distributions with respect to our preferred shares, if any, and then to our Common Shares. Corporate shareholders will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction with respect to these distributions. Under the current tax law, U.S. holders that are individuals, trusts and estates generally may deduct 20% of “qualified REIT dividends” (i.e., REIT dividends other than capital gain dividends and portions of REIT dividends designated as qualified dividend income eligible for capital gain tax rates). The overall deduction is limited to 20% of the sum of the taxpayer’s taxable income (less net capital gain) and certain cooperative dividends, subject to further limitations based on taxable income. The deduction, if allowed in full, equates to a maximum effective U.S. federal income

43

tax rate on ordinary REIT dividends of 29.6%. Without further legislation, the deduction would sunset after 2025.

Distributions in excess of both current and accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to a U.S. holder to the extent that the distributions do not exceed the adjusted basis of the holder’s shares. Rather, such distributions will reduce the adjusted basis of the shares. To the extent that distributions exceed the adjusted basis of a U.S. holder’s shares, the U.S. holder generally must include such distributions in income as long-term capital gain if the shares have been held for more than one year, or short-term capital gain if the shares have been held for one year or less.

Distributions will generally be taxable, if at all, in the year of the distribution. However, if we declare a dividend in October, November or December of any year with a record date in one of these months and pay the dividend on or before January 31 of the following year, we will be treated as having paid the dividend, and the shareholder will be treated as having received the dividend, on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.

We will be treated as having sufficient earnings and profits to treat as a dividend any distribution we pay up to the amount required to be distributed in order to avoid imposition of the 4% excise tax discussed above. Moreover, any “deficiency dividend” will be treated as an ordinary or capital gain dividend, as the case may be, regardless of our earnings and profits. As a result, U.S. holders may be required to treat certain distributions that would otherwise result in a tax-free return of capital as taxable dividends.

Capital Gain Dividends. We may elect to designate distributions of our net capital gain as “capital gain dividends” to the extent that such distributions do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year. Capital gain dividends are taxed to U.S. holders of our shares as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for more than one year. This tax treatment applies regardless of the period during which the shareholders have held their shares. If we designate any portion of a dividend as a capital gain dividend, the amount that will be taxable to the shareholder as capital gain will be indicated to U.S. holders on IRS Form 1099-DIV. Corporate shareholders, however, may be required to treat up to 20% of capital gain dividends as ordinary income. Capital gain dividends are not eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporations.

Instead of paying capital gain dividends, we may elect to require shareholders to include our undistributed net capital gains in their income. If we make such an election, U.S. holders (i) will include in their income as long-term capital gains their proportionate share of such undistributed capital gains and (ii) will be deemed to have paid their proportionate share of the tax paid by us on such undistributed capital gains and thereby receive a credit or refund to the extent that the tax paid by us exceeds the U.S. holder’s tax liability on the undistributed capital gain. A U.S. holder of our Common Shares will increase the basis in its Common Shares by the difference between the amount of capital gain included in its income and the amount of tax it is deemed to have paid. A U.S. holder that is a corporation will appropriately adjust its earnings and profits for the retained capital gain in accordance with Treasury regulations to be prescribed by the IRS. Our earnings and profits will be adjusted appropriately.

We must classify portions of our designated capital gain dividend into the following categories:

• a 20% gain distribution, which would be taxable to non-corporate U.S. holders of our Common Shares at a federal rate of up to 20%; or

• an unrecaptured Section 1250 gain distribution, which would be taxable to non-corporate U.S. holders of our Common Shares at a maximum rate of 25%.

We must determine the maximum amounts that we may designate as 20% and 25% capital gain dividends by performing the computation required by the Code as if the REIT were an individual whose ordinary income were subject to a marginal tax rate of at least 28%. The IRS currently requires that distributions made to different classes of shares be comprised proportionately of dividends of a particular type.

44

Passive Activity Loss and Investment Interest Limitation. Distributions that we make and gains arising from the disposition of our Common Shares by a U.S. holder will not be treated as passive activity income, and therefore U.S. holders will not be able to apply any “passive activity losses” against such income. Dividends paid by us, to the extent they do not constitute a return of capital, will generally be treated as investment income for purposes of the investment income limitation on the deduction of the investment interest.

Qualified Dividend Income. Distributions that are treated as dividends may be taxed at capital gains rates, rather than ordinary income rates, if they are distributed to an individual, trust or estate, are properly designated by us as qualified dividend income and certain other requirements are satisfied. Dividends are eligible to be designated by us as qualified dividend income up to an amount equal to the sum of the qualified dividend income received by us during the year of the distribution from other C corporations such as TRSs, our “undistributed” REIT taxable income from the immediately preceding year, and any income attributable to the sale of a built-in gain asset from the immediately preceding year (reduced by any U.S. federal income taxes that we paid with respect to such REIT taxable income and built-in gain).

Dividends that we receive will be treated as qualified dividend income to us if certain criteria are met. The dividends must be received from a domestic corporation (other than a REIT or a regulated investment company) or a qualifying foreign corporation. A foreign corporation generally will be a qualifying foreign corporation if it is incorporated in a possession of the United States, the corporation is eligible for benefits of an income tax treaty with the United States which the Secretary of Treasury determines is satisfactory, or the shares on which the dividend is paid is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. However, if a foreign corporation is a foreign personal holding company, a foreign investment company or a passive foreign investment company, then it will not be treated as a qualifying foreign corporation, and the dividends we receive from such an entity would not constitute qualified dividend income.

Furthermore, certain exceptions and special rules apply to determine whether dividends may be treated as qualified dividend income to us. These rules include certain holding requirements that we would have to satisfy with respect to the shares on which the dividend is paid, and special rules with regard to dividends received from regulated investment companies and other REITs.

In addition, even if we designate certain dividends as qualified dividend income to our shareholders, the shareholder will have to meet certain other requirements for the dividend to qualify for taxation at capital gains rates. For example, the shareholder will only be eligible to treat the dividend as qualifying dividend income if the shareholder is taxed at individual rates and meets certain holding requirements. In general, in order to treat a particular dividend as qualified dividend income, a shareholder will be required to hold our shares for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning on the date which is 60 days before the date on which the share becomes ex-dividend.

Other Tax Considerations. To the extent that we have available net operating losses and capital losses carried forward from prior tax years, such losses may reduce the amount of distributions that we must make in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. Such losses, however, are not passed through to shareholders and do not offset income of shareholders from other sources, nor would such losses affect the character of any distributions that we make, which are generally subject to tax in the hands of shareholders to the extent that we have current or accumulated earnings and profits.

Although not expected, if excess inclusion income from a taxable mortgage pool or REMIC residual interest is allocated to a U.S. shareholder, that income will be taxable in the hands of the U.S. shareholder and would not be offset by any net operating losses of the U.S. shareholder that would otherwise be available. See “—Taxable Mortgage Pools” above. As required by IRS guidance, we intend to notify our U.S. shareholders if a portion of a dividend paid by us is attributable to excess inclusion income.

45

Sales of Our Common Shares. Upon any taxable sale or other disposition of our Common Shares, a U.S. holder of our Common Shares will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between:

• the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received on such disposition; and

• the U.S. holder’s adjusted basis in such Common Shares for tax purposes.

Gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if our Common Shares have been held by the U.S. holder as a capital asset. The applicable tax rate will depend on the holder’s holding period in the asset (generally, if an asset has been held for more than one year, it will produce long-term capital gain) and the holder’s tax bracket.

In general, any loss upon a sale or exchange of our Common Shares by a U.S. holder who has held such shares for six months or less (after applying certain holding period rules) will be treated as a long-term capital loss, but only to the extent of distributions from us received by such U.S. holder that are required to be treated by such U.S. holder as long-term capital gains.

Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders of Our Common Shares

The rules governing the U.S. federal income taxation of non-U.S. holders are complex. This section is only a summary of such rules.

We urge non-U.S. holders to consult their own tax advisors to determine the impact of federal, state, local and foreign income tax laws on the ownership and disposition of our Common Shares, including any reporting requirements.

Distributions. Distributions by us to a non-U.S. holder on our Common Shares that are neither attributable to gain from sales or exchanges by us of “U.S. real property interests” nor designated by us as capital gains dividends will be treated as dividends of ordinary income to the extent that they are made out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. These distributions generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax on a gross basis at a rate of 30%, or a lower rate as may be specified under an applicable income tax treaty, unless the dividends are treated as effectively connected with the conduct by the non-U.S. holder of a trade or business within the United States. Under some treaties, however, lower rates generally applicable to dividends do not apply to dividends from REITs. Further, if we engage in transactions that result in a portion of our dividends being considered excess inclusion income, reduced treaty rates are not available to the extent the income allocated to the non-U.S. holder is excess inclusion income. Dividends that are effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment) will be subject to tax on a net basis, that is, after allowance for deductions, at graduated rates, in the same manner as U.S. holders are taxed with respect to these dividends, and are generally not subject to withholding. Applicable certification and disclosure requirements must be satisfied to be exempt from withholding under the effectively connected income exception. Any dividends received by a corporate non-U.S. holder that is engaged in a trade or business within the United States may also be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate, or lower applicable treaty rate.

A non-U.S. holder of our Common Shares who wishes to claim the benefit of an applicable treaty rate and avoid backup withholding, as discussed below, for our ordinary dividends will be required (i) to complete the applicable IRS Form W-8 and certify under penalty of perjury that such holder is not a U.S. person as defined under the Code and is eligible for treaty benefits or (ii) if our Common Shares are held through certain foreign intermediaries, to satisfy the relevant certification requirements of applicable Treasury regulations. Special certification and other requirements apply to certain non-U.S. holders that are pass-through entities rather than corporations or individuals.

A non-U.S. holder of our Common Shares eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.

46

Distributions that are neither attributable to gain from sales or exchanges of “U.S. real property interests” nor designated as capital gains dividends and that are in excess of our current or accumulated earnings and profits that do not exceed the adjusted basis of the non-U.S. holder in its Common Shares will reduce the non-U.S. holder’s adjusted basis in its Common Shares and will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. Distributions that are neither attributable to gain from sales or exchanges of “U.S. real property interests” nor designated as capital gains dividends and that are in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits that do exceed the adjusted basis of the non-U.S. holder in its Common Shares will be treated as gain from the sale of its shares, the tax treatment of which is described below under “—Sales of Our Common Shares.” Because we generally cannot determine at the time we make a distribution whether or not the distribution will exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, we normally will withhold tax on the entire amount of any distribution at the same rate as we would withhold on a dividend.

We would be required to withhold at least 15% of any distribution to a non-U.S. holder in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits if our Common Shares constitute a U.S. real property interest with respect to such non-U.S. holder, as described below under “—Sales of Our Common Shares.” This withholding would apply even if a lower treaty rate otherwise applies or the non-U.S. holder is not liable for tax on the receipt of that distribution. However, a non-U.S. holder may seek a refund of these amounts from the IRS if the non-U.S. holder’s U.S. tax liability with respect to the distribution is less than the amount withheld.

Distributions to a non-U.S. holder that are designated by us at the time of the distribution as capital gain dividends, other than those arising from the disposition of a U.S. real property interest, generally should not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation unless:

• The investment in our Common Shares is effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of the non-U.S. holder), in which case the non-U.S. holder will generally be subject to the same treatment as U.S. holders with respect to any gain, except that a holder that is a foreign corporation also may be subject to the 30% branch profits tax, as discussed above; or

• The non-U.S. holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year of the distribution and has a “tax home” in the United States, in which case the individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s capital gains.

Under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (“FIRPTA”), distributions to a non-U.S. holder that are attributable to gain from sales or exchanges by us of U.S. real property interests, whether or not designated as capital gain dividends, will cause the non-U.S. holder to be treated as recognizing gain that is income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Non-U.S. holders will be taxed on this gain at the same rates applicable to U.S. holders, subject to a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals. Also, this gain may be subject to a 30% (or lower applicable treaty rate) branch profits tax in the hands of a non-U.S. holder that is a corporation. A distribution is not attributable to a U.S. real property interest if we held an interest in the underlying asset solely as a creditor.

We will be required to withhold and remit to the IRS at the highest rate of U.S. federal income tax applicable to each non-U.S. holder, based on the status of such holder, of any distributions to non-U.S. holders that are designated as capital gain dividends, or, if greater, the highest rate of U.S. federal income tax applicable to each non-U.S. holder, based on the status of such holder, of a distribution that could have been designated as a capital gain dividend, whether or not attributable to sales of U.S. real property interests. Distributions can be designated as capital gain dividends to the extent of our net capital gain for the taxable year of the distribution. The amount withheld, which for individual non-U.S. holders may exceed the actual tax liability, is creditable against the non-U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability.

47

However, the above withholding tax will not apply to any capital gain dividend with respect to (i) any class of our shares which is “regularly traded” on an established securities market located in the United States if the non-U.S. holder did not own more than 10% of such class of shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of such dividend or (ii) a “qualified shareholder” or a “qualified foreign pension fund.” Instead, any capital gain dividend will be treated as a distribution subject to the rules discussed above under “—Distributions.” Also, the branch profits tax would not apply to such a distribution. However, it is not anticipated that our Common Shares will be “regularly traded” on an established securities market.

Although the law is not clear on the matter, it appears that amounts we designate as undistributed capital gains in respect of the shares held by U.S. holders generally should be treated with respect to non-U.S. holders in the same manner as actual distributions by us of capital gain dividends. Under that approach, the non-U.S. holders would be able to offset as a credit against their U.S. federal income tax liability resulting therefrom their proportionate share of the tax paid by us on the undistributed capital gains, and to receive from the IRS a refund to the extent that their proportionate share of this tax paid by us were to exceed their actual U.S. federal income tax liability. If we were to designate a portion of our net capital gain as undistributed capital gain, a non-U.S. holder is urged to consult its tax advisor regarding the taxation of such undistributed capital gain.

Sales of Our Common Shares. Gain recognized by a non-U.S. holder upon the sale or exchange of our shares generally would not be subject to U.S. taxation unless:

• the investment in our Common Shares is effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of the non-U.S. holder), in which case the non-U.S. holder will be subject to the same treatment as domestic holders with respect to any gain;

• the non-U.S. holder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a tax home in the United States, in which case the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s net capital gains for the taxable year; or

• the non-U.S. holder is not a qualified shareholder or a qualified foreign pension fund (each as defined below) and our Common Shares constitute U.S. real property interests within the meaning of FIRPTA, as described below.

Our Common Shares will not generally constitute a U.S. real property interest within the meaning of FIRPTA as long as (i) we are not a “United States real property holding corporation” during a specified testing period and certain procedural requirements are satisfied or (ii) we are a domestically-controlled REIT. A “United States real property holding corporation” is a U.S. corporation that at any time during the applicable testing period owned U.S. real property interests that exceeded in value 50% of the value of the corporation’s U.S. real property interests, interests in real property located outside the United States and other assets used in the corporation’s trade or business. We do not expect that 50% or more of our assets will consist of U.S. real property interests. Even if our Common Shares otherwise would be a U.S. real property interest under the foregoing test, our Common Shares will not constitute a U.S. real property interest if we are a domestically-controlled REIT. We will be a domestically-controlled REIT if, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of our shares is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. holders. No assurance can be given, however, that we will be a domestically-controlled REIT.

Proposed Treasury regulations issued on December 29, 2022 (the “Proposed Regulations”) would modify the existing Treasury regulations relating to the determination of whether we are a domestically-controlled REIT by providing a look-through rule for our shareholders that are non-publicly traded partnerships, REITs, regulated investment companies or domestic “C” corporations owned 25% or more directly or indirectly by foreign persons (“foreign owned domestic corporations”) and by treating “qualified foreign pension funds” as foreign persons for this purpose. Although the Proposed Regulations are intended to be effective after they are finalized, the preamble to the Proposed Regulations state that the IRS may challenge contrary positions that are taken before

48

the Proposed Regulations are finalized. Moreover, the Proposed Regulations would apply to determine whether a REIT was domestically controlled for the entire five-year testing period prior to any disposition of our Common Shares, rather than applying only to the portion of the testing period beginning after the Proposed Regulations are finalized. The Proposed Regulations relating to foreign owned domestic corporations are inconsistent with prior tax guidance. We cannot predict if or when or in what form the Proposed Regulations will be finalized or what our composition of investors that are treated as domestic under these final regulations will be at the time of enactment. Please consult your tax advisor.

Even if we were not a domestically-controlled REIT, a sale of Common Shares by a non-U.S. holder would nevertheless not be subject to taxation under FIRPTA as a sale of a U.S. real property interest if:

• our Common Shares were “regularly traded” on an established securities market within the meaning of applicable Treasury regulations; and

• the non-U.S. holder did not actually, or constructively under specified attribution rules under the Code, own more than 10% of our Common Shares at any time during the shorter of the five-year period preceding the disposition or the holder’s holding period.

However, it is not anticipated that our Common Shares will be “regularly traded” on an established securities market. If gain on the sale or exchange of our Common Shares were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the non-U.S. holder would be subject to regular U.S. federal income tax with respect to any gain in the same manner as a taxable U.S. holder, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax and special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals. In such a case, under FIRPTA the purchaser of Common Shares may be required to withhold 15% of the purchase price and remit this amount to the IRS.

Qualified Shareholders. Subject to the exception discussed below, a qualified shareholder who holds our Common Shares directly or indirectly (through one or more partnerships) will not be subject to FIRPTA withholding on distributions by us or dispositions of our Common Shares. While a qualified shareholder will not be subject to FIRPTA withholding on distributions by us or dispositions of our Common Shares, certain investors of a qualified shareholder (i.e., non-U.S. persons who hold interests in the qualified shareholder (other than interests solely as a creditor), and hold more than 10% of our Common Shares (whether or not by reason of the investor’s ownership in the qualified shareholder)) may be subject to FIRPTA withholding.

A qualified shareholder is a non-U.S. person that (i) either is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty which includes an exchange of information program and whose principal class of interests is listed and regularly traded on one or more recognized stock exchanges (as defined in such comprehensive income tax treaty), or is a foreign partnership that is created or organized under foreign law as a limited partnership in a jurisdiction that has an agreement for the exchange of information with respect to taxes with the United States and has a class of limited partnership units representing greater than 50% of the value of all the partnership units that is regularly traded on the NYSE or NASDAQ markets, (ii) is a “qualified collective investment vehicle” (within the meaning of Section 897(k)(3)(B) of the Code), and (iii) maintains records on the identity of each person who, at any time during the non-U.S. person’s taxable year, is the direct owner of 5% or more of the class of interests or units (as applicable) described in (i), above.

Qualified Foreign Pension Funds. Any distribution to a qualified foreign pension fund or qualified controlled entity (or a foreign partnership that is entirely owned by a qualified foreign pension fund or qualified controlled entity) who holds our Common Shares will not be subject to FIRPTA withholding on distributions by us or dispositions of our Common Shares.

A qualified foreign pension fund is any trust, corporation, or other organization or arrangement (i) which is created or organized under the law of a country other than the United States, (ii) which is established (a) by such country (or one or more political subdivisions thereof) to provide retirement or pension benefits to participants or beneficiaries that are current or former employees (including self-employed individuals) or persons designated

49

by such employees, as a result of services rendered by such employees to their employers or (b) by one or more employers to provide retirement or pension benefits to participants or beneficiaries that are current or former employees (including self-employed individuals) or persons designated by such employees in consideration for services rendered by such employees to such employers, (iii) which does not have a single participant or beneficiary with a right to more than 5% of its assets or income, (iv) which is subject to government regulation and with respect to which annual information reporting about its beneficiaries is provided, or is otherwise available, to the relevant tax authorities in the country in which it is established or operates, and (v) with respect to which, under the laws of the country in which it is established or operates, (a) contributions to such trust, corporation, organization or arrangement that would otherwise be subject to tax under such laws are deductible or excluded from the gross income of such entity or arrangement or taxed at a reduced rate, or (b) taxation of any investment income of such trust, corporation, organization or arrangement is deferred or such income is excluded from the gross income of such entity or arrangement or is taxed at a reduced rate. A qualified controlled entity is any trust or corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country, all of the interests of which (other than an interest solely as a creditor) are held directly by one or more qualified foreign pension funds or indirectly by one or more qualified foreign pension funds through one or more qualified controlled entities or partnerships.

We urge non-U.S. holders to consult their own tax advisors to determine their eligibility for exemption from FIRPTA withholding and their qualification as a qualified shareholder, a qualified foreign pension fund, a qualified controlled entity or a foreign partnership that is entirely owned by a qualified foreign pension fund or qualified controlled entity.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Returns. If a non-U.S. holder is subject to taxation under FIRPTA on proceeds from the sale of our Common Shares or on distributions we make, the non-U.S. holder will be required to file a U.S. federal income tax return.

Prospective non-U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors to determine the impact of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income tax laws on their acquisition, ownership and disposition of our Common Shares, including any reporting requirements.

Taxation of Tax-Exempt Holders of Our Common Shares

Provided that a tax-exempt holder has not held its Common Shares as “debt-financed property” within the meaning of the Code and our shares of beneficial interest are not being used in an unrelated trade or business, dividend income from us generally will not be unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”) to a tax-exempt holder. Similarly, income from the sale of our Common Shares will not constitute UBTI unless the tax-exempt holder has held its Common Shares as debt-financed property within the meaning of the Code or has used our Common Shares in a trade or business.

Although not expected, to the extent that we are (or part of us, or a disregarded subsidiary of ours, is) a taxable mortgage pool, or we hold residual interests in a REMIC, the portion of the dividends paid to a U.S. tax-exempt holder that is allocable to excess inclusion income will be treated as UBTI. If, however, excess inclusion income is allocable to some categories of U.S. tax-exempt holders that are not subject to UBTI, we might be subject to corporate level tax on such income, and, in that case, may reduce the amount of distributions to those holders whose ownership gave rise to the tax. See “—Taxable Mortgage Pools” above. As required by IRS guidance, we intend to notify our shareholders if a portion of a dividend paid by us is attributable to excess inclusion income.

Further, for a tax-exempt holder that is a social club, voluntary employee benefit association, supplemental unemployment benefit trust or qualified group legal services plan exempt from U.S. federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (c)(9), (c)(17) and (c)(20) of the Code, respectively, or a single parent title-holding corporation exempt under Section 501(c)(2) the income of which is payable to any of the aforementioned

50

tax-exempt organizations, income from an investment in our Common Shares will constitute UBTI unless the organization properly sets aside or reserves such amounts for purposes specified in the Code. These tax-exempt holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning these “set aside” and reserve requirements.

Notwithstanding the above, however, a portion of the dividends paid by a “pension-held REIT” are treated as UBTI as to any trust which is described in Section 401(a) of the Code, is tax-exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code, and holds more than 10%, by value, of the interests in the REIT. Tax-exempt pension funds that are described in Section 401(a) of the Code are referred to below as “pension trusts.”

A REIT is a “pension-held REIT” if it meets the following two tests:

• it would not have qualified as a REIT but for Section 856(h)(3) of the Code, which provides that stock owned by pension trusts will be treated, for purposes of determining whether the REIT is closely held, as owned by the beneficiaries of the trust rather than by the trust itself; and

• either (i) at least one pension trust holds more than 25% of the value of the interests in the REIT, or (ii) a group of pension trusts each individually holding more than 10% of the value of the REIT’s stock, collectively owns more than 50% of the value of the REIT’s stock.

The percentage of any REIT dividend from a “pension-held REIT” that is treated as UBTI is equal to the ratio of the UBTI earned by the REIT, treating the REIT as if it were a pension trust and therefore subject to tax on UBTI, to the total gross income of the REIT. An exception applies where the percentage is less than 5% for any year, in which case none of the dividends would be treated as UBTI. The provisions requiring pension trusts to treat a portion of REIT distributions as UBTI will not apply if the REIT is not a “pension-held REIT” (for example, if the REIT is able to satisfy the “not closely held requirement” without relying on the “look through” exception with respect to pension trusts). Because of our Declaration of Trust’s restrictions on the number of our shares that a person may own, we do not anticipate that we will become a “pension-held REIT.”

Prospective tax-exempt holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the impact of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income tax laws on their acquisition, ownership and disposition of our Common Shares, including any reporting requirements.

Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting

U.S. Holders of Common Shares. In general, information-reporting requirements will apply to payments of dividends and proceeds of the sale of our Common Shares held by U.S. holders, unless such U.S. holder is an exempt recipient. A backup withholding tax may apply to such payments if such U.S. holder fails to provide a taxpayer identification number or certification of other exempt status or fails to report in full dividend or interest income. In addition, we may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain distributions to any U.S. holders who fail to certify their U.S. status to us. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

Brokers that are required to report the gross proceeds from a sale of our Common Shares on IRS Form 1099-B will also be required to report the customer’s adjusted basis in our Common Shares sold and whether any gain or loss with respect to such shares is long-term or short-term. In some cases, there may be alternative methods of determining the basis in our Common Shares sold, in which case your broker will apply a default method of its choosing if you do not indicate which method you choose to have applied. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding these reporting requirements and their election options.

Non-U.S. Holders of Our Common Shares. We must report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S. holder the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends, regardless of

51

whether withholding was required. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the non-U.S. holder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty.

A non-U.S. holder will be subject to backup withholding for dividends paid to such holder unless such holder certifies under penalty of perjury that it is a non-U.S. holder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that such holder is a “United States person” as defined under the Code), or such holder otherwise establishes an exemption.

Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale of our Common Shares within the United States or conducted through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries, unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalty of perjury that it is a non-U.S. holder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a “United States person” as defined under the Code), or such owner otherwise establishes an exemption.

Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against a non-U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

Legislative or Other Actions Affecting REITs

The present U.S. federal income tax treatment of REITs may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time. The REIT rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the Treasury, which may result in statutory changes as well as revisions to regulations and interpretations. Changes to the U.S. federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could adversely affect an investment in our Common Shares.

Tax Shelter Reporting

If a shareholder recognizes a loss with respect to our shares of $2 million or more for an individual shareholder or $10 million or more for a corporate shareholder, the shareholder must file a disclosure statement with the IRS on Form 8886. Direct shareholders of portfolio securities are in many cases exempt from this reporting requirement, but shareholders of a REIT currently are not excepted. The fact that a loss is reportable under these regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayer’s treatment of the loss is proper. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the applicability of these regulations in light of their individual circumstances.

Additional Withholding Requirements

Under Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code (such Sections commonly referred to as “FATCA”), a 30% U.S. federal withholding tax may apply to any ordinary dividends and other distributions that we pay to (i) a “foreign financial institution” (as specifically defined in the Code and whether such foreign financial institution is the beneficial owner or an intermediary) which does not provide sufficient documentation, typically on IRS Form W-8BEN-E, evidencing either (x) an exemption from FATCA, or (y) its compliance (or deemed compliance) with FATCA (which may alternatively be in the form of compliance with an intergovernmental agreement with the United States) in a manner that avoids withholding, or (ii) a “non-financial foreign entity” (as specifically defined in the Code and whether such non-financial foreign entity is the beneficial owner or an intermediary) which does not provide sufficient documentation, typically on IRS Form W-8BEN-E, evidencing either (x) an exemption from FATCA, or (y) adequate information regarding certain substantial U.S. beneficial owners of such entity (if any). If a dividend payment is both subject to withholding under FATCA and subject to withholding tax discussed above, the withholding under FATCA may be credited against, and therefore reduce, such other withholding tax. While withholding under FATCA would also have applied to payments of gross

52

proceeds from the sale or other taxable disposition of our Common Shares, proposed Treasury regulations (upon which taxpayers may rely until final regulations are issued) eliminate FATCA withholding on payments of gross proceeds entirely. Non-U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors to determine the applicability of this legislation in light of their individual circumstances.

Certain ERISA Considerations

The following is a summary of certain considerations associated with the purchase and holding of the Common Shares by (i) “employee benefit plans” (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA that is subject to Title I of ERISA, (ii) “plans” described in Section 4975 of the Code that is subject to Section 4975 of the Code (including, without limitation, an individual retirement account (“IRA”) and a “Keogh” plan), (iii) plans, funds, accounts or other arrangements that is subject to any Similar Laws, and (iv) entities whose underlying assets are considered to include the assets of any of the foregoing described in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii), pursuant to ERISA or otherwise (each of the foregoing described in clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) we refer to as a “Plan”).

General Fiduciary Matters

ERISA and the Code impose certain duties on persons who are fiduciaries of a Plan which is a Benefit Plan Investor (defined below) and prohibit certain transactions involving the assets of a Benefit Plan Investor and its fiduciaries or other interested parties. Under ERISA and the Code, any person who exercises any discretionary authority or control over the administration of such a Benefit Plan Investor or the management or disposition of the assets of a Benefit Plan Investor, or who renders investment advice for a fee or other compensation to a Benefit Plan Investor, is generally considered to be a fiduciary of the Benefit Plan Investor. The term “benefit plan investor” (“Benefit Plan Investor”) is generally defined to include (a) “employee benefit plans” within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA that are subject to Title I of ERISA, (b) “plans” within the meaning of Section 4975 of the Code to which Section 4975 of the Code applies (including, without limitation “Keogh” plans and IRAs), and (c) entities whose underlying assets include plan assets by reason of the investment in such entity by one or more employee benefit plans or plans described in clause (a) and (b) (e.g., an entity of which 25% or more of the total value of any class of equity interests is held by Benefit Plan Investors and which does not satisfy another exception under ERISA).

In considering an investment in the Common Shares of a portion of the assets of any Plan, a fiduciary should consider whether an investment in the Common Shares is appropriate for the Plan, taking into account the provisions of the Plan documents, the overall investment policy of the Plan and the composition of the Plan’s investment portfolio, as there are imposed on Plan fiduciaries certain fiduciary requirements, including those of investment prudence and diversification and the requirement that a Plan’s investments be made in accordance with the documents governing the Plan. Further, a fiduciary should consider that in the future there may be no market in which the Plan would be able to sell or otherwise dispose of the Common Shares.

Prohibited Transaction Issues

Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code prohibit Benefit Plan Investors from engaging in specified transactions involving plan assets with persons or entities who are “parties in interest,” within the meaning of ERISA, or “disqualified persons,” within the meaning of Section 4975 of the Code, unless an exemption is available. A party in interest or disqualified person who engaged in a non-exempt prohibited transaction may be subject to excise taxes and other penalties and liabilities under ERISA and the Code. In addition, the fiduciary of the Benefit Plan Investor that engaged in such a non-exempt prohibited transaction may be subject to penalties and liabilities under ERISA and the Code. The fiduciary of a Benefit Plan Investor that proposes to purchase or hold any Common Shares should consider, among other things, whether such purchase and holding may involve the sale or exchange of any property between a Benefit Plan Investor and a party in interest or disqualified person, or the transfer to, or use by or for the benefit of, a party in interest or disqualified person, of any assets of a Benefit Plan Investor. Depending on the satisfaction of certain conditions which may include the identity of the Benefit Plan Investor fiduciary making the decision to acquire or hold any Common Shares on behalf of a Benefit Plan Investor, Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption (“PTCE”) 91-38 (relating to

53

investments by bank collective investment funds), PTCE 84-14 (relating to transactions effected by a “qualified professional asset manager”), PTCE 95-60 (relating to investments by an insurance company general account), PTCE 96-23 (relating to transactions directed by an in-house asset manager) or PTCE 90-1 (relating to investments by insurance company pooled separate accounts) could provide an exemption from the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. However, there can be no assurance that any of the foregoing exemptions or any other class, administrative or statutory exemption will be available with respect to any particular transaction involving the Common Shares. It is also possible that one of these exemptions could apply to some aspect of the acquisition or holding of the Common Shares, but not apply to some other aspect of such acquisition or holding. Each of the above-noted exemptions contains conditions and limitations on its application. Fiduciaries of Benefit Plan Investors considering acquiring and/or holding the Common Shares in reliance on these or any other exemption should carefully review the exemption in consultation with their legal advisors to assure it is applicable. There can be no assurance that all of the conditions of any such exemptions will be satisfied.

Plan Assets Issues

An additional issue concerns the extent to which the Company or all or a portion of the assets of the Company could themselves be treated as subject to the fiduciary responsibility or prohibited transaction rules of Title I of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. Under ERISA and the Plan Asset Regulations, generally when a Benefit Plan Investor acquires an “equity interest” in an entity that is neither a “publicly offered security” (within the meaning of the Plan Asset Regulations) nor a security issued by an investment company registered under the 1940 Act, the Benefit Plan Investor’s assets include both the equity interest and an undivided interest in each of the underlying assets of the entity, unless it is established either that less than 25% of the total value of each class of equity interest in the entity is held by Benefit Plan Investors (the “25% Test”) or that the entity is an “operating company” as defined in the Plan Asset Regulations. For purposes of the 25% Test, the assets of an entity will not be treated as “plan assets” if, immediately after the most recent acquisition of any equity interest in the entity, less than 25% of the total value of each class of equity interest in the entity is held by Benefit Plan Investors, excluding equity interests held by persons (other than Benefit Plan Investors) with discretionary authority or control over the assets of the entity or who provide investment advice for a fee (direct or indirect) with respect to such assets, and any affiliates thereof. A “publicly offered security” is defined in the Plan Asset Regulations as a security that is (a) “freely transferable,” (b) part of a class of securities that is “widely held,” and (c) (i) sold to the plan as part of an offering of securities to the public pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act and is part of a class of securities that is registered under the Exchange Act within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year of the issuer during which the offering of such securities to the public has occurred, or (ii) is part of a class of securities that is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

Until such time, if any, as our Common Shares are considered “publicly-offered securities” within the meaning of the Plan Asset Regulations, we intend to limit investment in our Common Shares by Benefit Plan Investors to less than 25% of the total value of our Common Shares as described above. However, no assurance can be given that this will be the case.

If, notwithstanding our intent, the assets of the Company were deemed to constitute “plan assets” of any shareholder that is a Benefit Plan Investor under ERISA or the Plan Asset Regulations, this would result, among other things, in (i) the application of the prudence and other fiduciary responsibility standards of ERISA to investments made by the Company, and (ii) the possibility that certain transactions in which the Company might seek to engage could constitute “prohibited transactions” under ERISA and the Code. If a prohibited transaction occurs for which no exemption is available, the Advisor and/or any other fiduciary that has engaged in the prohibited transaction could be required to (i) restore to the Benefit Plan Investor any profit realized on the transaction and (ii) reimburse the Benefit Plan Investor for any losses suffered by the Benefit Plan Investor as a result of the investment. In addition, each disqualified person (within the meaning of Section 4975 of the Code) involved could be subject to an excise tax equal to 15% of the amount involved in the prohibited transaction for each year the transaction continues and, unless the transaction is corrected within statutorily required periods, to an additional tax of 100%. The fiduciary of a Benefit Plan Investor who decides to invest in the Company could,

54

under certain circumstances, be liable for prohibited transactions or other violations as a result of their investment in the Company or as co-fiduciaries for actions taken by or on behalf of the Company or the Advisor. With respect to a Benefit Plan Investor that is an individual retirement account (an “IRA”) that invests in the Company, the occurrence of a prohibited transaction involving the individual who established the IRA, or his or her beneficiaries, would cause the IRA to lose its tax-exempt status. In addition, to the extent that the Company represents and/or covenants to any contractual counterparty that (1) the assets of the Company are not assets of the Benefit Plan Investors that invest in the Company and/or (2) the transactions entered into between the Company and the Benefit Plan Investor that invest in the Company do not constitute “prohibited transactions” under ERISA and the Code, and the applicable representation is untrue and/or the applicable covenant is not met, additional liabilities may be incurred, including as a result of the unwinding of the applicable contract.

Other Plans

Plans that are governmental plans (as defined in Section 3(32) of ERISA), certain church plans (as defined in Section 3(33) of ERISA) and non-U.S. plans (as described in Section 4(b)(4) of ERISA) may not be subject to the fiduciary responsibility or prohibited transaction rules of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code, but may be subject to Similar Laws which may affect their investment in the Common Shares. Fiduciaries of any such Plans should consult with counsel in connection with an investment in the Common Shares.

Representation

By acceptance of the Common Shares, each shareholder of a Common Share will be deemed to have represented and warranted that either (i) no portion of the assets used by such shareholder to acquire or hold Common Shares constitutes assets of any Plan or (ii) the purchase and holding of the Common Shares by such shareholder will not constitute a non-exempt prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code or similar violation under any applicable Similar Laws.

Reporting of Indirect Compensation

ERISA’s general reporting and disclosure rules, certain Benefit Plan Investors subject to Title I of ERISA are required to file annual reports (Form 5500) with the DOL regarding their assets, liabilities and expenses. To facilitate compliance with these requirements it is noted that the descriptions contained in this Registration Statement of fees and compensation, including the management fee and incentive fee payable to the Advisor, are intended to satisfy the disclosure requirements for “eligible indirect compensation” for which the alternative reporting option on Schedule C of Form 5500 may be available.

This Registration Statement does not constitute an undertaking to provide impartial investment advice and it is not our intention to act in a fiduciary capacity with respect to any Plan. Benefit Street Partners, the Advisor and their respective affiliates (the “Relevant Entities”) have a financial interest in stockholders’ investment in the Common Shares on account of the fees and other compensation they expect to receive (as the case may be) from us and their other relationships with us as contemplated in this Registration Statement. Any such fees and compensation do not constitute fees or compensation rendered for the provision of investment advice to any Plan. Each shareholder that is, or is investing (directly or indirectly) in us with the assets of, a Plan will be deemed to represent and warrant that it is advised by a fiduciary that is (a) independent of the Relevant Entities; (b) capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with respect to particular transactions and investment strategies contemplated in this Registration Statement; and (c) a fiduciary (under ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code or applicable Similar Law) with respect to the Plan’s investment in the Common Shares, who is responsible for exercising independent judgment in evaluating the Plan’s investment in the Common Shares and any related transactions.

Each purchaser or transferee that is or is acting on behalf of a Plan should consult with its legal advisor concerning the potential consequences to the Plan under ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code or applicable Similar Law of an investment in the Common Shares.

55

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Investing in our Common Shares involves a high degree of risk. The following information is a discussion of the material risk factors associated with an investment in our Common Shares specifically, as well as those factors generally associated with an investment in a company with investment objectives, investment policies, capital structure or trading markets similar to ours. Before making an investment in the Company, investors should carefully consider the following risk factors. The risks and uncertainties set forth below are not the only risks and uncertainties that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks were to occur, our business, financial condition or could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the NAV of our Common Shares could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure

The Company has no operating history and will begin operations upon the initial closing. There can be no assurance that the results achieved by the Advisor or its affiliates’ past investments will be achieved for the Company. Past performance should not be relied upon as an indication of future results.

The Company has no operating history and will begin operations upon the initial closing. There can be no assurance that the results achieved by the Advisor or its affiliates’ past investments will be achieved for the Company. Past performance should not be relied upon as an indication of future results. While clients managed by the Advisor have acquired individual investments that fall within the Company’s investment strategy and manage a fund that has a strategy similar to one component of the Company’s strategy, the Advisor has not previously managed for the entire term a fund portfolio with an investment strategy substantially similar to that of the Company. As a result, an investment in our Common Shares may entail more risk than an investment in a REIT or a BDC with a substantial operating history.

We are dependent on Benefit Street Partners and its affiliates, including the Advisor, and their key personnel who provide services to us through the Investment Advisory Agreement, and we may not find a suitable replacement for the Advisor if the Investment Advisory Agreement is terminated, or for these key personnel if they leave Benefit Street Partners or otherwise become unavailable to us.

We have no employees and are completely reliant on the Advisor. Some of our officers are executive officers of Benefit Street Partners. The Advisor has significant discretion as to the implementation of our investment and operating policies and strategies. Accordingly, we believe that our success depends to a significant extent upon the efforts, experience, diligence, skill and network of business contacts of the officers and key personnel of the Advisor. The officers and key personnel of the Advisor evaluate, negotiate, originate and monitor our investments; therefore, our success depends on their continued service. The departure of any of the officers or key personnel of the Advisor could have a material adverse effect on our performance.

The Advisor is not obligated to dedicate any specific personnel exclusively to us. In addition, none of our officers or the officers of the Advisor are obligated to dedicate any specific portion of their time to our business. Some of our officers have significant responsibilities for Other BSP Accounts. Although these individuals will be able to allocate an adequate amount of their time to the management of our business, they may not always be able to devote significant time to the management of our business. Further, when there are turbulent conditions or distress in the real estate credit markets or more generally the CRE market, the attention of the Advisor’s personnel and our executive officers and the resources of BSP will also be required by Other BSP Accounts. In such situations, we may not receive the level of support and assistance that we may receive if we were internally managed.

In addition, we offer no assurance that BSP will remain the Advisor or that we will continue to have access to Benefit Street Partners’ officers and key personnel. If the Investment Advisory Agreement is terminated and no suitable replacement is found, we may not be able to execute our business plan.

Finally, there is no guarantee (i) that the Advisor will succeed in implementing our investment objectives or strategy or in identifying investments that are in accordance with Benefit Street Partners’ investment philosophy or (ii) that historical trends of prior programs sponsored by Benefit Street Partners will continue during the life of our operations.

56

Our Advisor manages our portfolio pursuant to broad investment guidelines and is not required to seek the approval of our Board of Trustees for each investment, financing, asset allocation or hedging decision made by it, which may result in our making riskier loans and other investments and which could materially and adversely affect us.

Our Advisor is authorized to follow broad investment guidelines that provide it with substantial discretion regarding investment, financing, asset allocation and hedging decisions. Our Board of Trustees will periodically review our investment guidelines and our portfolio but will not, and will not be required to, review and approve in advance all of our proposed loans and other investments or our Advisor’s financing, asset allocation or hedging decisions. In addition, in conducting periodic reviews, our trustees may rely primarily on information provided, or recommendations made, to them by our Advisor or its affiliates. Subject to maintaining our REIT qualification and regulation under the 1940 Act, our Advisor has significant latitude within the broad investment guidelines in determining the types of loans and other investments it makes for us, and how such loans and other investments are financed or hedged, which could result in investment returns that are substantially below expectations or losses, which could materially and adversely affect us.

There is no public trading market for our Common Shares and we do not expect to have a share repurchase program; therefore, you are not able to dispose of your Common Shares during the Term of the Company unless approved by the Adviser.

There is no current public trading market for our Common Shares, and we do not expect that such a market will ever develop in the future. Given that the Company is a fixed-term BDC, we also do not expect to have a share repurchase program. As a result, shareholders are not able to dispose any of the Common Shares during the Term of the Company unless approved by the Adviser. Thereafter, as the Company winds down, the Company intends to make distributions gradually.

There can be no assurances that the U.S. or global financial systems will remain stable, and the occurrence of another significant credit market disruption may negatively impact the Company’s ability to dispose of any commercial mortgage loans that the Company may originate or in which it may invest, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s performance.

The global financial markets experienced significant disruptions in 2008 and 2009, during which time the global credit markets collapsed, borrowers defaulted on their loans, and banks and other lending institutions suffered heavy losses. During that period, many lenders were forced to hold commercial mortgage loans for extended periods of time and were not able to find alternative financing sources for these loans. During the second half of 2011, volatility in the financial markets resulting from the European sovereign debt crisis, U.S. debt ceiling crisis and U.S. government credit downgrade caused certain market participants to curtail their CMBS lending activities. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in extreme volatility in a variety of global markets, including the real estate-related debt markets. Participants in these markets received margin calls from their lenders as a result of the decline in the market value of the assets pledged to their lenders under repurchase agreements and warehouse credit facilities. Instability in the financial markets in the future could be caused by any number of factors beyond the Company’s control, including, without limitation, pandemics, terrorist attacks or other acts of war and adverse changes in international or national economic and market conditions. Any instability in the U.S. or global financial system or the occurrence of another significant credit market disruption in the future could reduce the Company’s ability to dispose of commercial mortgage loans that the Company originates or in which it invests and instead require that the Company hold these assets for an extended period of time and to seek alternative sources of financing, which may be less attractive, if available at all, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s performance.

57

The success of the Company’s activities is affected by general economic and market conditions, including, among others, interest rates, availability of credit, inflation rates, economic uncertainty, natural disasters, or pandemics, or changes in laws and trade barriers.

Recent economic and market conditions reflect increased levels of economic uncertainty, including as a result of increased competition, inflation and rising interest rates. These factors may affect the level and volatility of prices and the liquidity of the Company’s investments. The public markets are currently experiencing significant volatility and many observers believe a global economic downturn or recession is possible. The extent and duration of such volatility, to the real estate industry and global markets as a whole, is currently unknown. For this reason, valuations in this environment are subject to heightened uncertainty and subject to numerous subjective judgments, any or all of which could turn out to be incorrect. In addition, a general economic slowdown, or business disruptions, such as due to pandemics or natural disasters, could lead to a delay or slowing of economic activity generally or in specific areas, and could adversely impact the Company’s ability to find attractive opportunities, lead to an increase in refinancing or borrower defaults, or an increase in borrowers seeking to negotiate more advantageous terms. In addition, particular borrowers or collateral may be more likely to be adversely impacted by certain types of events. For example, governments have sought to limit travel or large gatherings, borrowers in the travel, hotel or similar industries have been particularly adversely impacted. Certain other industries, such as certain retailers may also be adversely impacted. Certain events, such as natural disasters may have regional impacts on borrowers located in such areas. Furthermore, while borrower revenue may be adversely impacted, such events could adversely impact borrowers and their ability to repay loans to the Company in other ways, such as impacting their workforce availability, cause closures, impact supply chains, or increase health care costs or other costs and expenses. Prolonged uncertainty may decrease demand in the longer terms and economic uncertainty or slowing can adversely impact the Company’s returns. Volatility or illiquidity could impair the Company’s profitability or result in losses. These factors also may affect the availability or cost of leverage, which may result in lower returns. To the extent any of these events occur, the Company’s performance results could be adversely affected.

Additionally, the ongoing market volatility and uncertainty could also adversely affect the Company’s operations. A counterparty to the Company or to a company in which the Company has invested may be relieved of its obligations under certain contracts to which it is a party, or, if it is determined not to have occurred, the Company and its investments may be required to meet their contractual obligations, despite potential constraints on their operations, liquidity and/or financial stability. Market volatility and uncertainty could also increase the risk of investors defaulting on their capital commitments or increase the number of investors requesting to transfer their interests to third parties. In addition, any new outbreak or reemergence of pandemics such as COVID-19, which is no longer a global health emergency according to the World Health Organization, is likely to cause ongoing material adverse effects across many, if not all, aspects of the global economy. Any outbreak or reemergence of a pandemic is likely to affect the ability of the Advisor to operate effectively, including the ability of personnel to carry out the Company’s investment strategy and objective. The full effects, duration and costs of any pandemic are impossible to predict and could cause material adverse effects to the Company.

We face risks associated with the deployment of our capital.

In light of the nature of our continuous private offering during the Investment Period in relation to our investment strategy and the need to be able to deploy potentially large amounts of capital quickly to capitalize on potential investment opportunities, we may have difficulty identifying, originating and/or purchasing suitable CRE debt and other investments on attractive terms, and there could be a delay between the time we receive net proceeds from the sale of our Common Shares and the time we invest such net proceeds. We may also from time to time hold cash pending deployment into investments or have less than our targeted leverage, which cash or shortfall in targeted leverage may at times be significant, particularly at times when we are receiving high amounts of offering net proceeds, or times when there are few attractive investment opportunities. Such cash may be held in an account that may be invested in money market accounts or other similar temporary investments, each of which are subject to the management fees payable to the Advisor.

58

In the event we are unable to find suitable investments, such cash may be maintained for longer periods, which would be dilutive to overall investment returns. This could cause a substantial delay in the time it takes for a shareholder’s investment to realize its full potential return and could adversely affect our ability to pay regular distributions of cash flow from operations. It is not anticipated that the temporary investment of such cash into money market accounts or other similar temporary investments pending deployment into investments will generate significant interest, and investors should understand that such low interest payments on the temporarily invested cash may materially adversely affect overall returns. In the event we fail to timely invest the net proceeds from sales of our Common Shares or do not deploy sufficient capital to meet our targeted leverage, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

The amount and source of distributions, if any, we may make to our shareholders is uncertain, and we may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows from our operations to make distributions to our shareholders at any time in the future.

We have not established a minimum distribution payment level, and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders may be materially adversely affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the risk factors described in this Registration Statement. Because we currently have no investments and have not identified any investments to acquire with the net proceeds of our private offering, we may not generate sufficient income to make distributions to our shareholders. Our Board of Trustees (or a committee of our Board of Trustees) will make determinations regarding distributions based upon, among other factors, our financial performance, debt service obligations, debt covenants, REIT qualification and tax requirements and capital expenditure requirements. Among the factors that could impair our ability to make distributions to our shareholders are:

• our inability to invest the net proceeds from sales of our Common Shares on a timely basis in income-producing investments;

• our inability to realize attractive risk-adjusted returns on our investments;

• high levels of expenses or reduced revenues that reduce our cash flow or non-cash earnings; and

• defaults in our investment portfolio or decreases in the value of our investments.

As a result, we may not be able to make distributions to our shareholders at any time in the future, and the level of any distributions, if any, we do make to our shareholders is unknown, may not increase or even be maintained over time, any of which could materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.

We may be unable to maintain or increase cash distributions over time, or may decide to reduce the amount of distributions for business reasons.

There are many factors that can affect the amount and timing of cash distributions to shareholders. The amount of cash available for distributions is affected by many factors, such as the cash provided by the Company’s investments and obligations to repay indebtedness as well as many other variables. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to pay or maintain the current level of distributions or that distributions will increase over time. In certain prior periods, quarterly distributions have been in excess of our quarterly earnings. Distributions in excess of earnings will decrease the book value per share of Common Shares. The Company cannot give any assurance that returns from the investments will be sufficient to maintain or increase cash available for distributions to shareholders. Actual results may differ significantly from the assumptions used by the Board of Trustees in establishing the distribution rate to shareholders. The Company may not have sufficient cash from operations to make a distribution required to qualify for or maintain our REIT status, which may materially adversely affect the value of our securities.

59

We may pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations, including, without limitation, borrowings, offering net proceeds and the sale of or repayments under our investments, and we have no limits on the amounts we may fund from such sources.

We may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fully fund distributions to shareholders. Therefore, we may fund distributions to our shareholders from sources other than cash flow from operations, including, without limitation, borrowings, offering net proceeds (including from sales of our Common Shares to Benefit Street Partners or its affiliates) and the sale of or repayments under our investments. The extent to which we fund distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations will depend on various factors, including, but not limited to, how quickly we invest the proceeds from this and any future offering and the performance of our CRE debt portfolio and other assets. Funding distributions from borrowings, offering net proceeds (including from sales of our Common Shares to Benefit Street Partners or its affiliates) and the sale of or repayments under our investments will result in us having less funds available to originate or acquire CRE loans or other assets. As a result, the return you realize on your investment may be reduced. Doing so may also negatively impact our ability to generate cash flows. Likewise, funding distributions from the sale of additional Common Shares (or other securities convertible into our Common Shares) will dilute your interest in us on a percentage basis and may impact the value of your investment especially if we sell these securities at prices less than the price you paid for your Common Shares. We may be required to continue to fund distributions from a combination of some of these sources if our investments fail to perform, if expenses are greater than our revenues or due to numerous other factors. We cannot predict when, if ever, distribution payments sourced from borrowings and from offering net proceeds may occur, and an extended period of such payments would likely be unsustainable. We have not established a limit on the amount of our distributions that may be funded from any of these sources.

To the extent we borrow funds to pay distributions, we would incur borrowing costs (including interest) and these borrowings would require a future repayment. The use of these sources for distributions and the ultimate repayment of any liabilities incurred could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions in future periods, decrease our NAV, decrease the amount of cash we have available for operations and new investments and materially adversely impact the value of your investment.

Valuations of our investments may reflect estimates of fair value and may not necessarily correspond to realizable value, which could adversely affect the value of your investment.

Newly originated or acquired loan investments will initially be valued at par in the month that they are closed, which is expected to represent fair value at that time. For each month after the initial month in which a loan investment is closed, the Advisor will value each such loan at fair market value, as agreed upon by the Advisor’s valuation committee and the independent valuation firm. In the event we pursue ownership interest in the underlying collateral on a defaulted loan, then the asset will become real estate owned (“REO”) and such REO properties will initially be valued at fair value less closing costs, at the time of acquisition. Thereafter, the REO properties will be valued by the Advisor, as agreed upon by the Advisor’s valuation committee and the independent valuation firm. Our publicly traded real-estate related assets that are not restricted as to salability or transferability will generally be valued by the Advisor monthly on the basis of publicly available market quotations or at fair value determined in accordance with GAAP. Our investments in privately placed debt instruments and securities of real estate-related operating businesses (other than joint ventures), such as real estate development or management companies, will initially be valued by the Advisor at the acquisition price and thereafter will be revalued monthly at fair value, as agreed upon by the Advisor’s valuation committee and the independent valuation firm. We will also report our derivative assets and liabilities at fair value based on price quotes from at least one independent pricing service. Our liquid non-real estate-related assets, including credit rated government debt securities, corporate debt securities, cash and cash equivalents, will be valued monthly by the Advisor based on market quotations or at fair value determined in accordance with GAAP.

Within the parameters of our valuation guidelines, the valuation methodologies used to value our investments in real estate debt and real estate-related securities will involve subjective judgments and projections

60

and may not be accurate. Valuation methodologies will also involve assumptions and opinions about future events, which may or may not turn out to be correct. Ultimate realization of the value of an asset depends to a great extent on economic, market and other conditions beyond our control and the control of the Advisor and the independent valuation firm. Further, valuations do not necessarily represent the price at which an asset would sell, since market prices of assets can only be determined by negotiation between a willing buyer and seller. As such, the estimated fair value of an asset may not reflect the price at which the asset could be sold in the market, and the difference between the estimated fair value and the ultimate sales price could be material. In addition, accurate valuations are more difficult with respect to illiquid assets and/or during times of low transaction volume because there are fewer market transactions that can be considered in the context of the valuation analysis. However, there will be no retroactive adjustment in the valuation of such assets, the offering price of our Common Shares or NAV-based fees we paid to the Advisor to the extent such valuations prove to not accurately reflect the realizable value of our assets.

Our NAV per share may change materially if the values of our investments materially change, if the actual operating results for a particular quarter differ from what we originally budgeted for that quarter or if there are fluctuations in interest rates.

Our investments are valued on a quarterly basis in accordance with our valuation guidelines. As such, when these new valuations are reflected in our NAV calculation, there may be a sudden change in our NAV per share for each class of our Common Shares. These changes in an investment’s value may be as a result of investment-specific events or as a result of more general changes to real estate values resulting from local, nation or global economic changes. In addition, actual operating results for a given quarter may differ from what we originally budgeted for that quarter, which may cause a sudden increase or decrease in the NAV per share amounts. We accrue estimated income and expenses on a daily basis based on our budgets. As soon as practicable after the end of each quarter, we adjust the income and expenses we estimated for that quarter to reflect the income and expenses actually earned and incurred. In addition, because we are focused on senior floating-rate mortgage loans, interest rate fluctuations may also cause a sudden increase or decrease in our NAV per share. We do not retroactively adjust the NAV per share of each class.

Our Board of Trustees may amend our Declaration of Trust without prior shareholder approval.

Our Board of Trustees may, without shareholder vote (subject to certain exceptions) amend or otherwise supplement the Declaration of Trust, including without limitation to classify the Board of Trustees, to impose advance notice provisions for Trustee nominations or for shareholder proposals and to require super-majority approval of transactions with significant shareholders or other provisions that may be characterized as anti-takeover in nature.

Your interest in us will be diluted if we issue additional shares.

Holders of our Common Shares will not have preemptive rights to any shares we issue in the future. Our Declaration of Trust authorizes us to issue an unlimited number of Common Shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.001 per share and an unlimited number of shares classified as preferred shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.001 per share. Our Board of Trustees may elect, without shareholder approval, to sell additional Common Shares in our private offering or any future offering. To the extent we issue additional Common Shares in the future, your percentage ownership interest in us will be diluted. Because of these and other reasons, our shareholders may experience substantial dilution in their percentage ownership of our Common Shares.

Our Declaration of Trust includes exclusive forum and jury trial waiver provisions that could limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim, make it more expensive or inconvenient for a shareholder to bring a claim, or, if such provisions are deemed inapplicable or unenforceable by a court, cause the Company to incur additional costs associated with such action.

Our Declaration of Trust provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding

61

brought on behalf of the Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a duty owed by any trustee, officer or other agent of the Company to the Company or our shareholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of Title 12 of the Delaware Code, Delaware statutory or common law, our Declaration of Trust or the bylaws, or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs (or similar) doctrine shall be the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, any other court in the State of Delaware with subject matter jurisdiction; provided, however, that the U.S. federal district courts shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the 1940 Act, the Securities Act, and the Exchange Act. The exclusive federal forum provision may expose investors to increased risks to successfully bringing claims, including increased expense, decreased convenience and the possibility that the exclusive federal forum provision may not be enforceable since both the Securities Act and 1940 Act permit investors to bring claims arising from these Acts in both state and federal courts. As a result, there is a risk that investors in the Company may find it inconvenient or expensive to bring a claim against us or our trustees, officers or other agents.

In addition, our Declaration of Trust provides that no shareholder may maintain a derivative action on behalf of the Company unless (i) the shareholder makes a pre-suit demand upon the Trustees and (ii) affords the Trustees a reasonable amount of time to consider such request and to investigate the basis of such claim. Except for claims arising under the U.S. federal securities laws, including, without limitation, the 1940 Act, (i) any claim must be brought as a derivative claim, irrespective of whether such claim involves a violation of the shareholder’s rights under our Declaration of Trust or any other alleged violation of contractual or individual rights that might otherwise give rise to a direct claim, (ii) the Trustees shall be entitled to retain counsel and other advisors in considering the merits of the request and may require such shareholder to reimburse the Company for the expense of any such advisors in the event that the Trustees determine not to bring such action, and (iii) holders of at least 10% of the outstanding shares join in the bringing of such action. These provisions of our Declaration of Trust may make it more difficult for shareholders to bring a derivative action than a company without such provisions.

Our Declaration of Trust also includes an irrevocable waiver of the right to trial by jury in all such claims, suits, actions and proceedings. Any person purchasing or otherwise acquiring any of our Common Shares shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to these provisions of our Declaration of Trust. These provisions may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum or in a manner that it finds favorable for disputes with the Company or the Company’s trustees or officers, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find the exclusive forum provision or the jury trial waiver provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions or in other manners, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, neither we nor any of our investors are permitted to waive compliance with any provision of the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

We will not be required to comply with certain reporting requirements, including those relating to auditor’s attestation reports on the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting, accounting standards and disclosure about our executive compensation, that apply to other public companies.

The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, relax certain reporting requirements for emerging growth companies, including certain requirements relating to accounting standards and compensation disclosure. We are classified as an emerging growth company. For as long as we are an emerging growth company, which may be up to five full fiscal years, unlike other public companies, we will not be required to (1) provide an auditor’s attestation report on the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (2) comply with any new or revised financial

62

accounting standards applicable to public companies until such standards are also applicable to private companies under Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act, (3) comply with any new requirements adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the financial statements of the issuer, (4) comply with any new audit rules adopted by the PCAOB after April 5, 2012 unless the SEC determines otherwise, (5) provide certain disclosure regarding executive compensation required of larger public companies or (6) hold shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation.

Once we are no longer an emerging growth company, so long as our Common Shares are not traded on a securities exchange, we will be deemed to be a “non-accelerated filer” under the Exchange Act, and as a non-accelerated filer, we will be exempt from compliance with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition, so long as we are externally managed by the Advisor and we do not directly compensate our executive officers, or reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates for salaries, bonuses, benefits and severance payments for persons who also serve as one of our executive officers or as an executive officer of the Advisor, we do not have any executive compensation, making the exemptions listed in (5) and (6) above generally inapplicable.

We cannot predict if investors will find our Common Shares less attractive because we choose to rely on any of the exemptions discussed above.

As noted above, under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of this transition period.

We depend on the Advisor to develop appropriate systems and procedures to control operational risk.

Operational risks arising from mistakes made in the confirmation or settlement of transactions, from transactions not being properly booked, evaluated or accounted for or other similar disruption in our operations may cause us to suffer financial losses, the disruption of our business, liability to third parties, regulatory intervention or damage to our reputation. We depend on the Advisor and its affiliates to develop the appropriate systems and procedures to control operational risk. We rely heavily on the Advisor’s financial, accounting and other data processing systems. The ability of our systems to accommodate transactions could also constrain our ability to properly manage our portfolio. Generally, the Advisor will not be liable for losses incurred due to the occurrence of any such errors. The personnel of the Advisor are engaged in other business activities, which could distract them, divert their time and attention such that they could no longer dedicate a significant portion of their time to our businesses or otherwise slow our rate of investment. Any failure to manage our business and our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our business could suffer in the event our Advisor or any other party that provides us with services essential to our operations experiences system failures or cyber-incidents or a deficiency in cybersecurity.

Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for the internal information technology systems of our Advisor and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations, these systems are vulnerable to damage from any number of sources, including computer viruses, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business.

As reliance on technology in our industry has increased, so have the risks posed to the systems of our Advisor and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations, both internal and outsourced.

63

In addition, the risk of a cyber-incident, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted attacks and intrusions evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected.

The remediation costs and lost revenues experienced by a victim of a cyber-incident may be significant and significant resources may be required to repair system damage, protect against the threat of future security breaches or to alleviate problems, including reputational harm, loss of revenues and litigation, caused by any breaches.

Although the Advisor and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations intend to continue to implement industry-standard security measures, there can be no assurance that those measures will be sufficient, and any material adverse effect experienced by the Advisor and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations could, in turn, have an adverse impact on us.

Risks Related to Our Investments

Our commercial real estate investments are subject to the risks typically associated with ownership of commercial real estate.

Our commercial real estate debt and real estate securities generally are directly or indirectly secured by a lien on real property. The occurrence of a default on a commercial real estate debt investment could result in our acquiring ownership of the property. We do not know whether the values of the properties ultimately securing our commercial real estate debt and loans underlying our securities will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of these loans and the dates of origination of the loans ultimately securing our securities, as applicable. In addition, our borrowers could fraudulently inflate the values of the underlying properties. If the values of the properties drop or are discovered to have been fraudulently inflated, the lower value of the security and reduction in borrower equity associated with such loans will increase our risk. In this manner, reduced real estate values could impact the values of our debt and security investments, making them subject to the risks typically associated with real estate ownership.

Our operating results may be adversely affected by a number of risks generally incident to holding real estate debt, including, without limitation:

• natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods, which we expect to increase in strength and frequency due to climate change;

• acts of war or terrorism, or criminal violence, including the consequences of terrorist attacks;

• adverse changes in national and local economic and real estate conditions;

• adverse changes in economic and market conditions related to pandemics and health crises, such as COVID-19;

• an oversupply of (or a reduction in demand for) space in the areas where particular properties securing our loans are located and the attractiveness of particular properties to prospective tenants;

• changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds that my render the sale of property difficult or unattractive;

• changes in governmental laws and regulations, fiscal policies and zoning ordinances and the related costs of compliance therewith and the potential for liability under applicable laws;

• costs of remediation and liabilities associated with environmental conditions affecting properties;

64

• reduced demand for office space, including as a result of changes in work habits, including remote or hybrid work schedules which allow work from remote locations other than the employer’s office premises;

• the potential for uninsured or underinsured property losses; and

• periods of high interest rates and tight money supply.

The value of each property securing our loans is affected significantly by its ability to generate cash flow and net income, which in turn depends on the amount of rental or other income that can be generated net of expenses required to be incurred with respect to the property. Many expenses associated with properties (such as operating expenses and capital expenses) cannot be reduced when there is a reduction in income from the properties.

These factors may have a material adverse effect on the ability of our borrowers to pay their loans and the ability of the borrowers on the underlying loans securing our securities to pay their loans, as well as on the value and the return that we can realize from assets we acquire and originate.

Commercial mortgage loans that the Company may originate or in which it may invest have certain distinct risk characteristics. Mortgage loans on commercial properties generally lack standardized terms, which may complicate their structure and increase due diligence costs.

The mortgage loans that the Company may originate or in which it may invest will generally be secured by various types of income-producing properties, and there are certain risks that are normally applicable to loans secured by such property types. However, it is possible that the properties securing certain of the floating rate loans that the Company may originate or in which it may invest may not be income-producing at the time the loan is made.

The repayment of a commercial mortgage loan is typically dependent upon the ability of the applicable property to produce cash flow. Even the liquidation value of a commercial property is determined, in substantial part, by the amount of the property’s cash flow (or its potential to generate cash flow). However, net operating income and cash flow can be volatile and may be insufficient to cover debt service on the loan at any given time.

The net operating income, cash flow and property value of mortgaged properties that secure commercial mortgage loans may be adversely affected by any one or more of the following factors:

• the age, design and construction quality of the property;

• perceptions regarding the safety, convenience and attractiveness of the property;

• the proximity and attractiveness of competing properties;

• the adequacy and effectiveness of the property’s operations, management and maintenance;

• increases in operating expenses (including but not limited to insurance premiums) at the property and in relation to competing properties;

• an increase in the capital expenditures needed to maintain the property or make improvements;

• the dependence upon a single tenant, or a concentration of tenants in a particular business or industry;

• a decline in the financial condition of a major tenant;

• an increase in vacancy rates; and

• a decline in rental rates as leases are renewed or entered into with new tenants.

65

Other factors are more general in nature and in addition to those described herewith, may include:

• national, regional or local economic conditions (including plant closings, military base closings, industry slowdowns and unemployment rates);

• local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of competing properties or rental space);

• demographic factors;

• decreases in consumer confidence;

• changes in prices for key commodities or products;

• changes in consumer tastes and preferences, including the effects of adverse publicity; and

• retroactive changes in building codes.

The volatility of net operating income for a property also may be influenced by many of the foregoing factors, as well as by matters such as:

• the length of tenant leases;

• the creditworthiness of tenants;

• the level of tenant defaults;

• the ability to convert an unsuccessful property to an alternative use;

• new construction in the same market as the mortgaged property;

• rent control laws or other laws impacting operating costs;

• the number and diversity of tenants;

• the availability of trained labor necessary for tenant operations;

• the rate at which new rentals occur; and

• the property’s operating leverage (which is the percentage of total property expenses in relation to revenue), the ratio of fixed operating expenses to those that vary with revenues, and the level of capital expenditures required to maintain the property and to retain or replace tenants.

A decline in the real estate market or in the financial condition of a major tenant will tend to have a more immediate effect on the net operating income of properties with short-term revenue sources (such as short-term or month-to-month leases) and may lead to higher rates of delinquency or defaults under mortgage loans secured by such properties.

Additionally, if the debt service associated with a commercial mortgage loan is scheduled to increase during the term of a loan pursuant to an increase in the mortgage interest rate, the expiration of an interest-only period or otherwise, there can be no assurance that the net cash flow at the property will be sufficient to pay the additional debt service and, even if it is sufficient, the requirement to pay the additional debt service may reduce the cash flow available to the borrower to operate and maintain the mortgaged property.

Most commercial mortgage loans are effectively non-recourse obligations of the borrower, meaning that there is no recourse against the borrower’s assets other than the underlying collateral. In the event of any default under a mortgage or other real-estate related loan held directly by the Company, the Company will bear a risk of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the mortgage or other loan, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s cash flow from operations. In the event of a default by a borrower on a non-recourse commercial real estate loan, the Company will only have recourse to the underlying asset (including any escrowed funds and reserves)

66

collateralizing the commercial real estate loan. If a borrower defaults on one of our commercial real estate debt investments and the underlying property collateralizing the commercial real estate debt is insufficient to satisfy the outstanding balance of the debt, the Company may suffer a loss of principal or interest. In addition, even if the Company has recourse to a borrower’s assets, the Company may not have full recourse to such assets in the event of a borrower bankruptcy as, the loan to such borrower will be deemed to be secured only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law. The Company is also exposed to these risks though the commercial real estate loans underlying a commercial real estate security that the Company holds may result in the Company not recovering a portion or all of its investment in such commercial real estate security.

Commercial mortgage loans acquired or originated by the Company may be non-performing or sub-performing at the time of their acquisition and/or may become non-performing or sub-performing following their acquisition for a wide variety of reasons.

Such non-performing or sub-performing commercial mortgage loans may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations and/or restructuring, which may entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in the interest rate and a substantial write down of the principal of such loan. However, even if a restructuring were successfully accomplished, a risk exists that, upon maturity of such commercial mortgage loan, replacement “takeout” financing will not be available. Purchases of participations in commercial mortgage loans raise many of the same risks as investments in commercial mortgage loans and also carry risks of illiquidity and lack of control. It is possible that BSP or its affiliates may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on collateral securing one or more commercial mortgage loans purchased by the Company. The foreclosure process varies jurisdiction by jurisdiction and can be lengthy and expensive. Borrowers often resist foreclosure actions, which often prolongs and complicates an already difficult and time-consuming process. In some states or other jurisdictions, foreclosure actions can take up to several years or more to conclude. During the foreclosure proceedings, a borrower may have the ability to file for bankruptcy, potentially staying the foreclosure action and further delaying the foreclosure process. Foreclosure litigation tends to create a negative public image of the collateral property and may result in disrupting ongoing leasing and management of the property.

Our loans and other investments expose us to risks associated with debt-oriented real estate investments generally.

We seek to invest primarily in debt instruments relating to CRE assets. As such, we are subject to, among other things, risk of defaults by borrowers in paying debt service on outstanding indebtedness and to other impairments of our loans and investments. Any deterioration of real estate fundamentals generally, and in North America, Europe and Australia in particular, could negatively impact our performance by making it more difficult for borrowers of our mortgage loans, or borrower entities, to satisfy their debt payment obligations, increasing the default risk applicable to borrower entities, and/or making it more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. Changes in general economic conditions will affect the creditworthiness of borrower entities and/or the value of underlying real estate collateral relating to our investments and may include economic and/or market fluctuations, changes in environmental, zoning and other laws, casualty or condemnation losses, regulatory limitations on rents, decreases in property values, changes in the appeal of properties to tenants, changes in supply and demand of real estate products, fluctuations in real estate fundamentals, the financial resources of borrower entities, energy supply shortages, various uninsured or uninsurable risks, natural disasters, pandemics or outbreaks of contagious disease, political events, terrorism and acts of war, outbreak of wars and military conflicts, changes in government regulations, changes in monetary policy, changes in real property tax rates and/or tax credits, changes in operating expenses, changes in interest rates, changes in inflation rates, changes in the availability of debt financing and/or mortgage funds which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable, increased mortgage defaults, increases in borrowing rates, changes in consumer spending, negative developments in the economy and/or adverse changes in real estate values generally and other factors that are beyond our control. This risk may be magnified in the

67

case of the more recent conflicts between Israel and Hamas, and the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, due to the significant sanctions and other restrictive actions taken against Russia by the U.S. and other countries, as well as the cessation of all business in Russia by many global companies. In addition, recent concerns about the real estate market, rising interest rates, inflation, energy costs and geopolitical issues have contributed to increased volatility and diminished expectations for the economy and markets going forward.

We cannot predict the degree to which economic conditions generally, and the conditions for real estate debt investing in particular, will improve or decline. Any declines in the performance of the U.S. and global economies or in the real estate debt markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

To the extent that the Company originates commercial mortgage loans, it will be subject to the laws, rules, and regulations of various federal, state and local government agencies regarding the origination, processing, underwriting, sale and servicing of mortgage loans.

Applicable laws, rules, and regulations may limit the interest rates, finance charges and other fees that the Company and/or the Advisor may charge in connection with a loan origination, may require the Company and/or the Advisor to make extensive disclosure, and may impose on the Company and/or the Advisor qualification and licensing obligations and reporting and net worth requirements. As an originator of mortgage loans, the Company and/or the Advisor may be subject to inspection by government agencies. The Company’s and/or the Advisor’s failure to comply with applicable requirements could lead to, among other things, the loss of the ability to originate further loans, the rescission or voiding of existing mortgage loans (or parts thereof), civil damages, class action lawsuits, and Federal, state and/or local enforcement actions. In addition, Federal, state, and local governments have proposed and may enact additional laws, rules, and regulations governing the origination of mortgage loans. These additional laws, rules and regulations may impose obligations and restrictions on the Company and/or the Advisor that may have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to achieve its investment objective.

Investments in single tenant net lease properties would expose us to risks related to the tenant’s financial stability.

To the extent the Company invests in single tenant net leased properties, the performance of these investments will depend heavily on the financial stability of the tenant. A default by any such tenant, or the bankruptcy or insolvency of the tenant, could lead to the loss of lease revenues and significantly increase the carrying cost of the property. Under U.S. bankruptcy law, a tenant that is the subject of bankruptcy proceedings has the option of assuming or rejecting any unexpired lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, any resulting claim we have for breach of the lease (excluding collateral securing the claim) will be treated as a general unsecured claim and the maximum claim will be capped.

Most of our investments are illiquid and we may not be able to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions, which may result in losses to us.

Most of our investments are illiquid. As a result, our ability to sell commercial real estate debt, securities or properties in response to changes in economic and other conditions, could be limited, even at distressed prices. The Code also places limits on our ability to sell properties held for fewer than two years. These considerations could make it difficult for us to dispose of any of our assets even if a disposition were in the best interests of our shareholders. As a result, our ability to vary our portfolio in response to further changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited, which may result in losses to us.

Prepayment rates may adversely affect the value of our investment portfolio.

We are subject to the risk that the issuer of a security or borrower under a loan may exercise its option to prepay principal earlier than scheduled, forcing us to reinvest the proceeds from such prepayment in lower

68

yielding securities or loans, which may result in a decline in our return. Debt investments frequently have call features that allow the issuer to redeem the security at dates prior to its stated maturity at a specified price (typically greater than par) only if certain prescribed conditions are met. An issuer may choose to redeem a debt security if, for example, the issuer can refinance the debt at a lower cost due to declining interest rates or an improvement in the credit standing of the issuer. Any such prepayments of our securities or loans could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Difficulty in redeploying the proceeds from repayments of our loans and investments may cause our financial performance and returns to investors to suffer.

As our loans and investments are repaid, we will have to redeploy the proceeds we receive into new loans and investments. It is possible that we will fail to identify reinvestment options that would provide returns or a risk profile that is comparable to the asset that was repaid. If we fail to redeploy the proceeds we receive from repayment of a loan in equivalent or better alternatives, our financial performance and returns to investors could suffer.

The mortgage loans in which we may invest and the mortgage loans underlying the mortgage securities in which we may invest are subject to delinquency, foreclosure and loss, which could result in losses to us.

CRE loans are secured by commercial properties and are subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure. The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by an income-producing property typically is dependent primarily upon the successful operation of such property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Net operating income of an income-producing property can be affected by, among other things: tenant mix and tenant bankruptcies, success of tenant businesses, property management decisions, including with respect to capital improvement, particularly in older building structures, property location and condition, competition from comparable types of properties offering the same or similar services, changes in laws that increase operating expenses or limit rents that may be charged, changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and in the state of the credit and securitization markets and the debt and equity capital markets, including diminished availability or lack of debt financing for commercial real estate, any need to address environmental contamination at the property, the occurrence of any uninsured casualty at the property, changes in national, regional or local economic conditions or specific industry segments, declines in regional or local real estate values, declines in regional or local rental or occupancy rates, increases in real estate tax rates, tax credits and other operating expenses, changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including environmental legislation, natural disasters, terrorism, social unrest and civil disturbances, and adverse changes in zoning laws.

In the event of any default under a mortgage loan held directly by us, we will bear a risk of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the mortgage loan, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow from operations and limit amounts available for distribution to our shareholders. In the event of the bankruptcy of a mortgage loan borrower, the mortgage loan to such borrower will be deemed to be secured only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the mortgage loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law. Foreclosure of a mortgage loan can be an expensive and lengthy process, which could have a substantial negative effect on our anticipated return on the foreclosed mortgage loan.

In addition, we are exposed to the risk of judicial proceedings with our borrowers and entities we invest in, including bankruptcy or other litigation, as a strategy to avoid foreclosure or enforcement of other rights by us as a lender or investor. In the event that any of the properties or entities underlying or collateralizing our loans or investments experiences or continues to experience any of the other foregoing events or occurrences, the value of, and return on, such investments could be reduced, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

69

Operating and disposing of properties acquired through foreclosure subject us to additional risks that could harm our results of operations.

The size of our real estate owned portfolio acquired through foreclosure has increased in recent years. We have in the past and we may in the future be forced to operate any foreclosed properties for a substantial period of time, which can be a distraction for our management team and may require us to pay significant costs associated with such property. Owning and operating real property involves risks that are different (and in many ways more significant) than the risks faced in owning a loan secured by that property. The costs associated with operating and redeveloping the property, including any operating shortfalls and significant capital expenditures, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. We may also be subject to environmental liabilities arising from such properties acquired in the foreclosure process. In addition, at such time that we elect to sell such property, the liquidation proceeds upon sale of the underlying real estate may not be sufficient to recover our cost basis, resulting in a loss to us. Furthermore, any costs or delays involved in the maintenance or liquidation of the underlying property will further reduce the net proceeds and, thus, increase the loss.

Delays in liquidating defaulted commercial real estate debt investments could reduce our investment returns.

If we originate or acquire commercial real estate debt investments and there are defaults under those debt investments, we may not be able to repossess and sell the properties securing the commercial real estate debt investment quickly. Foreclosure of a loan can be an expensive and lengthy process that could have a negative effect on our return on the foreclosed loan. Borrowers often resist foreclosure actions by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses, including but not limited to lender liability claims, in an effort to prolong the foreclosure action. In some states, foreclosure actions can take several years or more to resolve. At any time during the foreclosure proceedings, the borrower may file for bankruptcy, which would have the effect of staying the foreclosure action and further delaying the foreclosure process. The resulting time delay could reduce the value of the assets under the defaulted loans. Furthermore, an action to foreclose on a property securing a loan is regulated by state statutes and regulations and is subject to the delays and expenses associated with lawsuits if the borrower raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a borrower, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the property securing the loan or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the loan.

During periods of rising interest rates, our interest expense increases may outpace any increases in interest we earn on our assets, and the value of our assets may decrease.

Our operating results depend in large part on the income from our assets, reduced by any credit losses and financing costs. Income from our assets may respond more slowly to interest rate fluctuations than the cost of our borrowings. In a period of rising interest rates, our interest expense on floating-rate debt would increase, while any additional interest income we earn on our floating-rate investments may not compensate for such increase in interest expense. Consequently, changes in interest rates, particularly short-term interest rates, may significantly influence our net income. Increases in these rates will tend to decrease our net income and the market value of our assets. Similarly, in a period of declining interest rates, our interest income on floating-rate investments would generally decrease, and interest rate floors on our floating-rate investments may not align with the interest rate floors on our floating-rate debt to compensate for such a decrease in interest income. Interest rate fluctuations resulting in our interest expense exceeding the income from our assets would result in operating losses for us and may limit our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. In addition, if we need to repay existing borrowings during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments at times that may not permit realization of the maximum return on those investments, which would adversely affect our profitability.

70

Our due diligence may not reveal all material issues relating to our origination or acquisition of a particular investment.

Before making an investment, we assess the strength and skills of the management of the borrower or the operator of the property and other factors that we believe are material to the performance of the investment. In making the assessment and otherwise conducting customary due diligence, we rely on the resources available to us and, in some cases, an investigation by third parties. This process is particularly important with respect to newly organized or private entities because there may be little or no information publicly available about the entity. However, even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a particular investment, there can be no assurance that this diligence will uncover all material issues relating to such investment, that the information provided by the borrower is truthful or accurate, or that factors outside of our control will not later arise. If our due diligence fails to identify material issues, we have in the past and may in the future have to write-down or write-off assets, restructure our investment or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. Charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our Common Shares.

We are subject to risks from natural disasters such as earthquakes and severe weather, including as the result of global climate changes, which may result in damage to the properties securing our loans.

Natural disasters and severe weather such as earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes or floods may result in significant damage to the properties securing our loans or in which we invest. In addition, our investments may be exposed to new or increased risks and liabilities associated with global climate change, such as increased frequency or intensity of adverse weather and natural disasters, which could negatively impact our and our borrowers’ businesses and the value of the properties securing our loans or in which we invest. The extent of our or our borrowers’ casualty losses and loss in operating income in connection with such events is a function of the severity of the event and the total amount of exposure in the affected area. While the geographic distribution of our portfolio somewhat limits our physical climate risk, some physical risk is inherent in the properties of our borrowers, particularly in certain borrowers’ locations and in the unknown potential for extreme weather or other events that could occur related to climate change. We may be materially and adversely affected by our exposure to losses arising from natural disasters or severe weather, including those associated with global climate change.

In addition, global climate change concerns could result in additional legislation and regulatory requirements, including those associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy, which could increase expenses or otherwise adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition, or the business, results of operations and financial condition of our borrowers.

Though this risk may be mitigated, in part, by the Company’s use of third-party valuation agents, if the Advisor overestimates the yields or incorrectly prices the risks of our investments, we may experience losses.

The Advisor values our potential investments based on yields and risks, taking into account estimated future losses on the mortgage loans, the underlying collateral included in the securitization’s pools and the estimated impact of these losses on expected future cash flows and returns. The Advisor’s loss estimates may not prove accurate, as actual results may vary from estimates. In the event that the Advisor underestimates the asset level losses relative to the price we pay for a particular investment, we may experience losses with respect to such investment.

Inflation risks may have an adverse impact on our returns.

Inflation is a sustained rise in overall price levels. Moderate inflation is associated with economic growth, while high inflation can signal an overheated economy. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money (i.e., as inflation increases, the values of the Company’s assets can decline). Inflation poses a “stealth” threat to investors because it reduces savings and investment returns. Central banks, such as the U.S. Federal Reserve, generally attempt to control

71

inflation by regulating the pace of economic activity. They typically attempt to affect economic activity by raising and lowering short-term interest rates. At times, governments may attempt to manage inflation through fiscal policy, such as by raising taxes or reducing spending, thereby reducing economic activity; conversely, governments can attempt to combat deflation with tax cuts and increased spending designed to stimulate economic activity. Such governmental efforts can have negative effects on the overall level of economic activity. The U.S. and other developed economies have recently begun to experience higher than normal inflation rates. It remains unclear whether substantial inflation in the U.S. and other developed economies will be sustained over an extended period of time or have a significant effect on the U.S. or other economies. Inflation rates may change frequently and significantly as a result of various factors, including unexpected shifts in the domestic or global economy and changes in economic policies, and the Company’s investments may not keep pace with inflation.

Real estate valuation is inherently subjective and uncertain.

The valuation of real estate and therefore the valuation of any underlying security relating to loans made by us is inherently subjective due to, among other factors, the individual nature of each property, its location, the expected future rental revenues from that particular property and the valuation methodology adopted. As a result, the valuations of the real estate assets against which we make loans are subject to a degree of uncertainty and are made on the basis of assumptions and methodologies that may not prove to be accurate, particularly in periods of volatility, low transaction flow or restricted debt availability in the commercial or residential real estate markets.

Loans on properties in transition will involve a greater risk of loss than conventional mortgage loans.

We may invest in transitional loans to borrowers who are typically seeking relatively short-term capital to be used in an acquisition or rehabilitation of a property. The typical borrower in a transitional loan has usually identified an undervalued asset that has been under-managed and/or is located in a recovering market. If the market in which the asset is located fails to improve according to the borrower’s projections, or if the borrower fails to improve the quality of the asset’s management and/or the value of the asset, the borrower may not receive a sufficient return on the asset to satisfy the transitional loan, and we bear the risk that we may not recover all or a portion of our investment.

In addition, borrowers usually use the proceeds of a conventional mortgage to repay a transitional loan. Transitional loans therefore are subject to the risk of a borrower’s inability to obtain permanent financing to repay the transitional loan and to the broader availability of conventional mortgages at amenable rates. In the event of any default under transitional loans that may be held by us, we bear the risk of loss of principal and non-payment of interest and fees to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the mortgage collateral and the principal amount and unpaid interest of the transitional loan. To the extent we suffer such losses with respect to these transitional loans, it could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks of cost overruns and noncompletion of renovations of properties in transition may result in significant losses.

The renovation, refurbishment or expansion of a property by a borrower involves risks of cost overruns and noncompletion. Estimates of the costs of improvements to bring an acquired property up to standards established for the market position intended for that property may prove inaccurate. Other risks may include rehabilitation costs exceeding original estimates, possibly making a project uneconomical, environmental risks, delays in legal and other approvals (e.g., for condominiums) and rehabilitation and subsequent leasing of the property not being completed on schedule. If such renovation is not completed in a timely manner, or if it costs more than expected, the borrower may experience a prolonged reduction of net operating income and may not be able to make payments on our investment on a timely basis or at all, which could result in significant losses.

Investment ratings that we may use are relative and subjective.

The Company may invest in debt securities that have been rated by nationally recognized rating organizations. In general, the ratings of these organizations represent the opinions of such agencies as to the

72

quality of investments that they rate. Such ratings are relative and subjective and are not statements of fact; they are not absolute standards of quality and do not evaluate the market value risk of the investments that are rated. Furthermore, there can be no guarantee that such credit ratings will not be downgraded in the future. Therefore, there can be no assurance that any such rating will accurately quantify the risk. Such agencies may change their method of valuation of, and the ratings of, securities held by the Company at any time. The sale price of mortgage-backed securities is highly correlated with the rating such mortgage-backed securities receive from the rating agencies. If an existing investment of the Company is downgraded, the value of such investment may be adversely affected which in turn may adversely affect the returns to investors.

Investments in non-conforming and non-investment grade rated loans or securities involve increased risk of loss.

Investments in non-conforming and non-investment grade rated loans or securities involve increased risk of loss. The Company’s investments may not conform to conventional loan standards applied by traditional lenders and either will not be rated or will be rated as non-investment grade by the credit rating agencies. The non-investment grade ratings for these assets typically result from the overall leverage of the loans, the lack of a strong operating history for the properties underlying the loans, the borrowers’ credit history, the properties’ underlying cash flow or other factors. As a result, these investments will have a higher risk of default and loss than investment grade rated assets. Any loss the Company may incur may be significant and may reduce distributions. There are no limits on the percentage of unrated or non-investment grade rated assets the Company may hold in its portfolio.

Syndication of originated loans may have adverse effects.

The Company intends to originate certain loans and, in some cases, to later syndicate a portion of those loans to third parties. In originating loans, the Company will compete with a broad spectrum of lenders, some of which may have greater financial resources than the Company and the Advisor. Increased competition for, or a diminishment in the available supply of, qualifying loans could result in lower yields on such loans. Prior to any syndication of such loans, or if such syndication is not successful, the Company’s exposure to the originated investment may exceed the exposure that the Advisor intends to have over the long-term or that the Company would have had if it had purchased such investment in the secondary market rather than originating it. There can be no assurance (i) that the Company will be successful in syndicating such loans, in whole or in part, (ii) that the syndication will take place in a timely manner and on terms and conditions that will be preferable for the Company or (iii) that expenses incurred by the Company with respect to such syndication will not be substantial. If the Company is not successful in syndicating such a loan, in whole or in part, the Company may consequently hold a greater concentration and have more exposure in the related investment than initially was intended, which could make the Company more susceptible to fluctuations in value resulting from adverse economic and/or business conditions with respect thereto. An investment by the Company that is not syndicated as originally anticipated could significantly reduce the Company’s overall investment returns. Even if a loan is eventually syndicated, the Company may bear the risks described above in the period prior to the syndication’s completion. In addition, such syndication, particularly to affiliates, is subject to conflicts of interest and risks related to valuation.

We may be unable to restructure loans in a manner that we believe maximizes value, particularly if we are one of multiple creditors in large capital structures.

In the current environment, in order to maximize value we may be more likely to extend and work out a loan, rather than pursue foreclosure. However, in situations where there are multiple creditors in large capital structures, it can be particularly difficult to assess the most likely course of action that a lender group or the borrower may take and it may also be difficult to achieve consensus among the lender group as to major decisions. Consequently, there could be a wide range of potential principal recovery outcomes, the timing of which can be unpredictable, based on the strategy pursued by a lender group and/or by a borrower. These

73

multiple creditor situations tend to be associated with larger loans. If we are one of a group of lenders, we may be a lender on a subordinated basis, and may not independently control the decision making. Consequently, we may be unable to restructure a loan in a manner that we believe would maximize value.

Our investments may be concentrated and are subject to risk of default.

Although the Company is limited in the amount of capital that may be committed to any single investment and certain geographies and types of property, the Company has broad latitude in the amount of capital that may be committed to investments in or loans to companies in any particular industry, sector or geography. As such, its assets may not be diversified and, if its assets are concentrated in a particular borrower, industry, sector, geography, property type, or similar category, the Company will be subject to an increased risk of loss if there is a decline in the market value of any security in which the Company has invested a large percentage of its assets or there are adverse consequences to such industry, sector, geography, property type or other group of borrowers. If a large portion of the assets of the Company is held in cash or similarly liquid form for an extended period of time, the Company’s ability to achieve its objective may be impacted.

Difficult conditions in the mortgage and CRE markets may cause us to experience market losses related to our holdings.

Our results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the real estate markets, the financial markets and the economy generally. Concerns about the real estate market, inflation, energy costs, geopolitical issues and the availability and cost of credit have contributed to increased volatility and diminished expectations for the economy and markets going forward. Deterioration in the real estate market may cause us to experience losses related to our assets and to sell assets at a loss. Declines in the market values of our investments may adversely affect our results of operations and credit availability, which may reduce earnings and, in turn, cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities and competition may limit our ability to originate and/or acquire desirable investments in our target assets and could also affect the pricing of these assets.

We operate in a highly competitive market for lending and investment opportunities. Our profitability depends, in large part, on our ability to originate and/or acquire our target assets at attractive prices. In originating or acquiring our target assets, we compete with a variety of institutional investors, including other REITs, commercial and investment banks, specialty finance companies, public and private funds, commercial finance and insurance companies and other financial institutions. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. Several other REITs have recently raised significant amounts of capital, and may have investment objectives that overlap with ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that may not be available to us, such as funding from the U.S. government, if we are not eligible to participate in programs established by the U.S. government. Many of our competitors are not subject to the operating constraints associated with REIT tax compliance or maintenance of an exception from the definition of an investment company under the 1940 Act. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, competition for originations of and investments in our target assets may lead to decreasing yields, which may further limit our ability to generate desired returns. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, desirable investments in our target assets may be limited in the future and we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, as we can provide no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objectives.

74

If we are unable to successfully integrate new assets or businesses and manage our growth, our results of operations and financial condition may suffer.

We may significantly increase the size and/or change the mix of our portfolio of assets. We may be unable to successfully and efficiently integrate newly-acquired or originated assets into our existing portfolio or otherwise effectively manage our assets or our growth effectively. In addition, increases in our portfolio of assets and/or changes in the mix of our assets may place significant demands on our Advisor’s administrative, operational, asset management, financial and other resources. Any failure to manage increases in size effectively could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The B Notes that we originate or acquire are subject to additional risks related to the privately negotiated structure and terms of the transaction, which may result in losses to us.

We may originate or acquire B Notes. A B Note is a mortgage loan typically (i) secured by a first mortgage on a single large commercial property or group of related properties and (ii) subordinated to an A Note secured by the same first mortgage on the same collateral. As a result, if a borrower defaults, there may not be sufficient funds remaining for a B Note holder after payment to the A Note holder. However, because each transaction is privately negotiated, B Notes can vary in their structural characteristics and risks. For example, the rights of holders of B Notes to control the process following a borrower default may vary from transaction to transaction. Further, B Notes typically are secured by a single property and so reflect the risks associated with significant concentration. Significant losses related to our B Notes would result in operating losses for us and may limit our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

Mezzanine loans involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing properties.

We may invest in mezzanine loans, which sometimes take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying property or more commonly take the form of loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the property or a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the property. These types of assets involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property because the loan may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal. Significant losses related to our mezzanine loans would result in operating losses for us and may limit our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

The failure of a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

The IRS has issued Revenue Procedure 2003-65, which provides a safe harbor pursuant to which a mezzanine loan, if it meets certain requirements, will be treated by the IRS as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and interest derived from such loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% gross income test. Although the Revenue Procedure provides a safe harbor on which taxpayers may rely, it does not prescribe rules of substantive tax law. We may originate or acquire mezzanine loans that do not satisfy all of the requirements for reliance on the safe harbor set forth in the Revenue Procedure, in which case, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the tax treatment of such loans. If such a challenge were sustained, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

75

We may experience a decline in the fair value of our assets.

A decline in the fair value of our assets would require us to recognize an unrealized loss against earnings for those assets that are recorded at fair value through earnings, or may trigger an impairment, credit loss or other charge against earnings under applicable GAAP for those assets that are not recorded at fair value through earnings if we expect that the carrying value of those assets will not be recoverable. Subsequent disposition or sale of such assets could further affect our future losses or gains depending on the actual proceeds received.

Investments outside the U.S. that are denominated in foreign currencies subject us to foreign currency risks and to the uncertainty of foreign laws and markets, which may adversely affect our distributions and our REIT status.

Investments or liabilities of the Company may be denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, and hence the value of such investments, or the amount of such liabilities, will depend in part on the relative strength of the U.S. dollar. The Company may be affected favorably or unfavorably by exchange control regulations or changes in the exchange rate between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates may also affect the value of dividends and interest earned, and the level of gains and losses realized on the sale of securities. The rates of exchange between the U.S. dollar and other currencies are affected by many factors, including forces of supply and demand in the foreign exchange markets. These rates are also affected by the international balance of payments and other economic and financial conditions, government intervention, speculation and other factors.

The Company is not obligated to engage in any currency hedging operations, and there can be no assurance as to the success of any hedging operations that the Company may implement. To the extent the Company enters into currency hedging operations, the Company may incur costs related to such hedging arrangements, which may be undertaken in exchange-traded or over-the-counter contexts, including futures, forwards, swaps, options and other instruments.

We are subject to the risks of investing in project finance investments, many of which are outside our control, and that may negatively impact our business and financial results.

We are subject to the risks of investing in project finance investments. The loan structure for project finance relies primarily on the underlying project’s cash flows for repayment, with the project’s assets, rights and interests, together with the equity in the project company, typically pledged as collateral. Accordingly, the ability of the project company to repay a project finance loan is dependent upon the successful development, construction and/or operation of such project rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the project company. Moreover, the loans are typically non-recourse or limited recourse to the project sponsor, and the project company, as a special purpose entity, typically has no assets other than the project. Accordingly, if the project’s cash flows are reduced or are otherwise less than projected, the project company may be unable to repay the loan. A project’s cash flows can be adversely affected by, among other things:

• if the project involves new construction;

• cost overruns;

• delays in completion;

• availability of land, building materials, energy, raw materials and transportation;

• availability of work force, management personnel and reliable contractors;

• natural disasters (fire, drought, flood, earthquake, pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic);

• global climate change, war, civil unrest and strikes affecting contractors, suppliers or markets;

• shortfalls in expected capacity, output or efficiency;

76

• the terms of the power purchase or other offtake agreements used in the project;

• the creditworthiness of the project company and the project sponsor;

• competition;

• volatility in commodity prices;

• technology deployed, and the failure or degradation of equipment;

• inflation and fluctuations in exchange rates or interest rates;

• operation and maintenance costs;

• unforeseen capital expenditures;

• sufficiency of gas and electric transmission capabilities;

• licensing and permit requirements;

• increased environmental or other applicable regulations;

• increased regulatory scrutiny and enforcement; and

• changes in national, international, regional, state or local policies, economic conditions, laws and regulations.

In the event of any default under a project finance loan, we bear the risk of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral, if any, and the principal and accrued interest of the loan, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In the event of the bankruptcy of a project company, our investment will be deemed to be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession and our contractual rights may be unenforceable under state or other applicable law. Foreclosure proceedings against a project can be an expensive and lengthy process, which could have a substantial negative effect on our anticipated return on the foreclosed investment.

Our investments in CMBS are generally subject to losses.

Our investments in CMBS are subject to losses. In general, losses on a mortgaged property securing a mortgage loan included in a securitization will be borne first by the equity holder of the property, then by a cash reserve fund or letter of credit, if any, then by the holder of a mezzanine loan or B Note, if any, then by the “first loss” subordinated security holder (generally, the “B-Piece” buyer) and then by the holder of a higher-rated security. In the event of default and the exhaustion of any equity support, reserve fund, letter of credit, mezzanine loans or B Notes, and any classes of securities junior to those in which we invest, we will not be able to recover all of our investment in the securities we purchase. In addition, if the underlying mortgage portfolio has been overvalued by the originator, or if the values subsequently decline and, as a result, less collateral is available to satisfy interest and principal payments due on the related CMBS, there would be an increased risk of loss. The prices of lower credit quality securities are generally less sensitive to interest rate changes than more highly rated investments, but more sensitive to adverse economic downturns or individual issuer developments.

We may not control the special servicing of the mortgage loans underlying the CMBS and CRE CLO Bonds in which we invest and, in such cases, the special servicer may take actions that could adversely affect our interests.

Overall control over the special servicing of the underlying mortgage loans of the CMBS and CRE CLO Bonds may be held by a directing certificate holder, which is appointed by the holders of the most subordinate class of such CMBS and CRE CLO Bonds. We ordinarily do not have the right to appoint the directing certificate holder. In connection with the servicing of the specially serviced mortgage loans, the related special servicer may, at the direction of the directing certificate holder, take actions that could adversely affect our interests.

77

With respect to certain mortgage loans included in our CMBS investments, the properties that secure the mortgage loans backing the securitized pool may also secure one or more related mortgage loans that are not in the CMBS, which may conflict with our interests.

Certain mortgage loans included in our CMBS investments may be part of a loan combination or split loan structure that includes one or more additional mortgaged loans (senior, subordinate or pari passu and not included in the CMBS investments) that are secured by the same mortgage instrument(s) encumbering the same mortgaged property or properties, as applicable, as is the subject mortgage loan. Pursuant to one or more co-lender or similar agreements, a holder, or a group of holders, of a mortgage loan in a subject loan combination may be granted various rights and powers that affect the mortgage loan in that loan combination, including: (i) cure rights; (ii) a purchase option; (iii) the right to advise, direct or consult with the applicable servicer regarding various servicing matters affecting that loan combination; or (iv) the right to replace the directing certificate-holder (without cause).

Dislocations, illiquidity and volatility in the market for commercial real estate as well as the broader financial markets could adversely affect the performance and value of commercial mortgage loans, the demand for CMBS and the value of CMBS investments.

Any significant dislocations, illiquidity or volatility in the real estate and securitization markets, including the market for CMBS, as well as global financial markets and the economy generally, could adversely affect our business and financial results. We cannot assure you that dislocations in the commercial mortgage loan market will not occur in the future.

Challenging economic conditions affect the financial strength of many commercial, multifamily and other tenants and result in increased rent delinquencies and decreased occupancy. Economic challenges may lead to decreased occupancy, decreased rents or other declines in income from, or the value of, commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community real estate.

Declining commercial real estate values, coupled with tighter underwriting standards for commercial real estate loans, may prevent commercial borrowers from refinancing their mortgages, which results in increased delinquencies and defaults on commercial, multifamily and other mortgage loans. Declines in commercial real estate values also result in reduced borrower equity, further hindering borrowers’ ability to refinance in an environment of increasingly restrictive lending standards and giving them less incentive to cure delinquencies and avoid foreclosure. The lack of refinancing opportunities has impacted and could impact in the future, in particular, mortgage loans that do not fully amortize and on which there is a substantial balloon payment due at maturity, because borrowers generally expect to refinance these types of loans on or prior to their maturity date. Finally, declining commercial real estate values and the associated increases in loan-to-value ratios would result in lower recoveries on foreclosure and an increase in losses above those that would have been realized had commercial property values remained the same or increased. Continuing defaults, delinquencies and losses would further decrease property values, thereby resulting in additional defaults by commercial mortgage borrowers, further credit constraints and further declines in property values.

The CMBS in which we invest is subject to the risks of the mortgage securities market as a whole and risks of the securitization process.

The value of CMBS may change due to shifts in the market’s perception of issuers and regulatory or tax changes adversely affecting the mortgage securities market as a whole. CMBS is also subject to several risks created through the securitization process. Subordinate tranches of CMBS is paid interest only to the extent that there are funds available to make payments. To the extent the collateral pool includes delinquent loans, there is a risk that the interest payment on subordinate CMBS will not be fully paid. Subordinate CMBS is also subject to greater credit risk than those CMBS that is more highly rated.

78

We are subject to the risks relating to increases in prepayment rates of debt underlying CMBS.

CMBS are indirectly subject to the risks associated with prepayments (including both voluntary prepayments by the borrowers and liquidations due to defaults and foreclosures) on mortgage loans.

In general, “premium” securities (securities whose market values exceed their principal or par amounts) are adversely affected by faster than anticipated prepayments, and “discount” securities (securities whose principal or par amounts exceed their market values) are adversely affected by slower than anticipated prepayments. Since many CMBS will be discount securities when interest rates are high, and will be premium securities when interest rates are low, these CMBS may be adversely affected by changes in prepayments in any interest rate environment.

The adverse effects of prepayments may impact investments in at least two ways. First, particular investments may experience outright losses, as in the case of interest-only securities in an environment of faster actual or anticipated prepayments. Second, particular investments may under-perform relative to hedges that may have been constructed for these investments, resulting in a loss to us. In particular, prepayments (at par) may limit the potential upside of many CMBS to their principal or par amounts, whereas their corresponding hedges often have the potential for unlimited loss. In addition, in the case of “premium” securities, prepayments at par may result in losses.

We may sponsor, and purchase the more junior securities of, CLOs and such instruments involve significant risks, including that these securities receive distributions from the CLO only if the CLO generates enough income to first pay all the investors holding senior tranches and all CLO expenses.

We may sponsor, and purchase the junior securities of, CLOs. In CLOs, investors purchase specific tranches, or slices, of debt instruments that are secured or backed by a pool of loans. The CLO debt classes have a specific seniority structure and priority of payments. The most junior securities along with the preferred shares of a CLO are generally retained by the sponsor of the CLO and are usually entitled to all of the income generated by the pool of loans after the payment of debt service on all the more senior classes of debt and the payment of all expenses. Defaults on the pool of loans therefore first affect the most junior tranches. The subordinate tranches of CLO debt may also experience a lower recovery and greater risk of loss, including risk of deferral or non-payment of interest than more senior tranches of the CLO debt because they bear the bulk of defaults from the loans held in the CLO and serve to protect the other, more senior tranches from default in all but the most severe circumstances. Despite the protection provided by the subordinate tranches, even more senior CLO tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, increased sensitivity to defaults due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches, decline in market value due to market anticipation of defaults and aversion to CLO securities as a class. Further, the transaction documents relating to the issuance of CLO securities may impose eligibility criteria on the assets of the CLO, restrict the ability of the CLO’s sponsor to trade investments and impose certain portfolio-wide asset quality requirements. Finally, the credit risk retention rules of the SEC impose a retention requirement of 5% of the issued debt classes by the sponsor of the CLO. These criteria, restrictions and requirements may limit the ability of the CLO’s sponsor (or collateral manager) to maximize returns on the CLO securities.

In addition, CLOs are not actively traded and are relatively illiquid investments and volatility in CLO trading markets may cause the value of these investments to decline. The market value of CLO securities may be affected by, among other things, changes in the market value of the underlying loans held by the CLO, changes in the distributions on the underlying loans, defaults and recoveries on the underlying loans, capital gains and losses on the underlying losses (or foreclosure assets), prepayments on the underlying loans and the availability, prices and interest rate of underlying loans. Furthermore, the leveraged nature of each subordinated tranche may magnify the adverse impact on such class of changes in the value of the loans, changes in the distributions on the loans, defaults and recoveries on the loans, capital gains and losses on the loans (or foreclosure assets), prepayment on loans and availability, price and interest rates of the loans.

79

Our CLOs include certain interest coverage tests, overcollateralization coverage tests or other tests that, if not met, may result in a change in the priority of distributions, which may result in the reduction or elimination of distributions to the subordinate debt and equity tranches until the tests have been met or certain senior classes of securities have been paid in full. For example, even if no loan in the pool experiences a default, an appraisal reduction of a loan in the pool may cause the pool of loans in the applicable CLO not to meet certain of these test. Accordingly, if such tests are not satisfied, we, as holders of the subordinate debt and equity interests in the applicable CLO, may experience a significant reduction in our cash flow from those interests.

Moreover, the reinvestment and replenishment period in one or more of our CLOs may be nearing the end of its term. Once the reinvestment and replenishment period has ended any repayments of a loan in the applicable CLO will require us to pay down the most senior debt in such CLO resulting in an increase in our cost of funds.

Furthermore, if any CLO that we sponsor or in which we hold interests fails to meet certain tests relevant to the most senior debt issued and outstanding by the CLO issuer, an event of default may occur under that CLO. If that occurs, (i) if we were serving as manager of such CLO, our ability to manage the CLO may be terminated and (ii) our ability to attempt to cure any defaults in such CLO may be limited, which would increase the likelihood of a reduction or elimination of cash flow and returns to us in such CLO for an indefinite time.

Third-party investments may involve additional risks.

Fund may co-invest with third-parties through partnerships, joint ventures or other entities. Such investments may involve risks not present in investments where a third-party is not involved, including the possibility that a third-party co-venturer or partner may at any time have economic or business interests or goals which are inconsistent with those of the Company, or may be in a position to take action contrary to the investment objective of the Company. In addition, the Company may in certain circumstances be liable for actions of its third-party co-venturer or partner.

In the event that the Company acquires fixed income securities and/or other instruments that are publicly traded, the Company will be subject to certain inherent risks.

In some circumstances, the Company may be unable to obtain financial covenants or other contractual rights, including management rights that it might otherwise be able to obtain in making privately-negotiated debt investments. Moreover, the Company may not have the same access to information in connection with investments in public instruments, either when investigating a potential investment or after making an investment, as compared to a privately-negotiated debt investment.

The Company may invest in high yield debt, a substantial portion of which may be rated below investment-grade by one or more nationally recognized statistical rating organizations or which may be unrated but of comparable credit quality to obligations rated below investment-grade, and have greater credit and liquidity risk than more highly rated debt obligations.

High yield debt is generally unsecured and may be subordinate to other obligations of the obligor. The lower rating of high yield debt reflects a greater possibility that adverse changes in the financial condition of the obligor or in general economic conditions (including, for example, a substantial period of rising interest rates or declining earnings) or both may impair the ability of the obligor to make payment of principal and interest. Many issuers of high yield debt are highly leveraged, and their relatively high debt-to-equity ratios create increased risks that their operations might not generate sufficient cash flow to service their debt obligations. In addition, many issuers of high yield debt may be in poor financial condition, experiencing poor operating results, having substantial capital needs or negative net worth or be facing special competitive or product obsolescence problems, and may include companies involved in bankruptcy or other reorganizations or liquidation proceedings. Certain of these securities may not be publicly traded, and, therefore, it may be difficult to obtain information as to the true condition of the issuers. Overall declines in the below investment-grade bond and other

80

markets may adversely affect such issuers by inhibiting their ability to refinance their debt at maturity. High yield debt is often less liquid than higher rated securities.

High yield debt is often issued in connection with leveraged acquisitions or recapitalizations in which the issuers incur a substantially higher amount of indebtedness than the level at which they had previously operated. High yield debt has historically experienced greater default rates than has been the case for investment-grade securities. The Company may also invest in equity securities issued by entities with unrated or below investment-grade debt.

High yield debt may also be in the form of zero-coupon or deferred interest bonds, which are bonds which are issued at a significant discount from face value. The original discount approximates the total amount of interest the bonds will accrue and compound over the period until maturity or the first interest accrual date at a rate of interest reflecting the market rate of the security at the time of issuance. While zero-coupon bonds do not require the periodic payment of interest, deferred interest bonds generally provide for a period of delay before the regular payment of interest begins. Such investments experience greater volatility in market value due to changes in the interest rates than bonds that that provide for regular payments of interest.

The Company may invest in convertible securities, which are bonds, debentures, notes, preferred stocks or other securities that may be converted into or exchanged for a specified amount of common stock of the same or different issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula.

A convertible security entitles the holder to receive interest that is generally paid or accrued on debt or a dividend that is paid or accrued on preferred stock until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. Convertible securities have unique investment characteristics in that they generally (i) have higher yields than common stocks, but lower yields than comparable non-convertible securities, (ii) are less subject to fluctuation in value than the underlying common stock due to their fixed-income characteristics and (iii) provide the potential for capital appreciation if the market price of the underlying common stock increases.

The value of a convertible security is a function of its “investment value” (determined by its yield in comparison with the yields of other securities of comparable maturity and quality that do not have a conversion privilege) and its “conversion value” (the security’s worth, at market value, if converted into the underlying common stock). The investment value of a convertible security is influenced by changes in interest rates, with investment value declining as interest rates increase and increasing as interest rates decline. The credit standing of the issuer and other factors may also have an effect on the convertible security’s investment value. The conversion value of a convertible security is determined by the market price of the underlying common stock. If the conversion value is low relative to the investment value, the price of the convertible security is governed principally by its investment value. To the extent the market price of the underlying common stock approaches or exceeds the conversion price, the price of the convertible security will be increasingly influenced by its conversion value. A convertible security generally will sell at a premium over its conversion value by the extent to which investors place value on the right to acquire the underlying common stock while holding a fixed-income security. Generally, the amount of the premium decreases as the convertible security approaches maturity.

A convertible security may be subject to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the convertible security’s governing instrument. If a convertible security held by the Company is called for redemption, the Company will be required to permit the issuer to redeem the security, convert it into the underlying common stock or sell it to a third-party. Any of these actions could have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to achieve its investment objective.

81

Risks Related to Debt Financing

When we borrow money, the potential for loss on amounts invested in us will be magnified and may increase the risk of investing in us. Borrowed money may also adversely affect the return on our assets, reduce cash available for distribution to our shareholders and result in losses.

The use of borrowings, also known as leverage, increases the volatility of investments by magnifying the potential for loss on invested equity capital. The use of leverage involves increased risk, including increased variability of the Company’s net income, distributions and NAV in relation to market changes. If the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause NAV to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not used leverage. Similarly, any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. In addition, our shareholders will bear the burden of any increase in our expenses as a result of our use of leverage, including interest expenses and any increase in the management or incentive fees payable to the Advisor.

We will use leverage to finance our investments. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on the Advisor’s and our Board of Trustees’ assessment of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing and is subject to the regulatory limitation described below. There can be no assurance that leveraged financing will be available to us on favorable terms or at all. However, to the extent that we use leverage to finance our assets, our financing costs will reduce cash available for distributions to shareholders. Moreover, we may not be able to meet our financing obligations and, to the extent that we cannot, we risk the loss of some or all of our assets to liquidation or sale to satisfy the obligations. In such an event, we may be forced to sell assets at significantly depressed prices due to market conditions or otherwise, which may result in losses.

As a BDC, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total borrowings and other senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any preferred shares that we may issue in the future, of at least 150%. If this ratio were to fall below 150%, we could not incur additional debt and could be required to sell a portion of our investments to repay some debt when it is disadvantageous to do so. This could have a material adverse effect on our operations and investment activities. Moreover, our ability to make distributions to you may be significantly restricted or we may not be able to make any such distributions whatsoever. The amount of leverage that we will employ will be subject to oversight by our Board of Trustees, a majority of whom are Independent Trustees with no material interests in such transactions.

Although borrowings by the Company have the potential to enhance overall returns that exceed the Company’s cost of funds, they will further diminish returns (or increase losses on capital) to the extent overall returns are less than the Company’s cost of funds. In addition, borrowings by the Company may be secured by the shareholders’ investments as well as by the Company’s assets and the documentation relating to such borrowing may provide that during the continuance of a default under such borrowing, the interests of the investors may be subordinated to such borrowing.

We may use repurchase agreements to finance our investments, which may expose us to risks that could result in losses, including due to cross-defaults and cross-collateralization under warehouse repurchase and credit facilities.

We may finance our acquisition and origination of mortgage loans, mezzanine loans and other portfolio assets under warehouse repurchase and credit facilities with various lenders. Such repurchase and credit facilities will be entered into by special purpose vehicles directly or indirectly owned and controlled by us. Although each transaction under our repurchase agreements has its own specific terms, such as identification of the assets subject to the transaction, sale price, repurchase price and rate, our financing subsidiaries remain exposed to the credit risk of each asset because they must purchase the asset from the applicable counterparty on a specified date. In addition, repurchase agreements involve the risk that the counterparty may liquidate the assets underlying the repurchase agreements following the occurrence of an event of default under the applicable

82

repurchase agreement by us. Furthermore, the counterparty may require us to provide additional margin in the form of cash or other forms of collateral under the terms of the applicable repurchase agreement. In addition, the interest costs and other fees associated with repurchase agreement transactions may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, and, in some cases, we may be worse off than if we had not used such instruments.

We also expect to provide guaranties to the lenders under which we expect to guarantee amounts of the balance outstanding from time to time under such repurchase and credit facilities by the special purpose vehicle sellers or borrowers. We expect to also be liable under such guaranties for customary “bad-boy” events. The repurchase and credit facilities will include customary cross-default provisions pursuant to which the occurrence of an event of default under any such facility (including breach of a financial covenant applicable to us under a guaranty) will trigger an event of default under all of the repurchase and credit facilities and allow the lenders to accelerate payment of all obligations due under such facilities. In addition, all loans and assets subject to repurchase transactions or pledged under an individual repurchase or credit facility will be cross-collateralized as security for such facility. Thus, the poor performance or non-performance of an individual loan or asset included as collateral for a repurchase or credit facility could result in us losing our interests in all loans and assets in the collateral pool for such facility.

Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment income.

Since we use debt to finance a portion of our investments, our net investment income depends, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, we can offer no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest rates when we have debt outstanding, our cost of funds will increase, which could reduce our net investment income. We expect that our long-term fixed-rate investments will be financed primarily with equity and long-term debt. We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. These techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged portfolio. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A rise in the general level of interest rates can be expected to lead to higher interest rates applicable to our debt investments. Accordingly, an increase in interest rates would make it easier for us to meet or exceed the Incentive Fee hurdle rate which is used for purposes of calculating the Incentive Fees payable to the Advisor and may result in a substantial increase of the amount of such Incentive Fees.

We may not be able to access financing sources on attractive terms, if at all, which could adversely affect our ability to fund and grow our business, or result in dilution to our existing shareholders.

Our ability to fund our loans and investments may be impacted by our ability to secure bank credit facilities (including term loans and revolving facilities), warehouse facilities and structured financing arrangements, public and private debt issuances (including through securitizations) and derivative instruments, in addition to transaction or asset specific funding arrangements and additional repurchase agreements on acceptable terms. We also rely on short-term financing that would be especially exposed to changes in availability. Our access to sources of financing will depend upon a number of factors, over which we have little or no control, including:

• general economic or market conditions;

• the market’s view of the quality of our assets;

• the market’s perception of our growth potential; and

• our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions.

83

We may need to periodically access the capital markets to, among other things, raise cash to fund new loans and investments. Unfavorable economic conditions or capital market conditions may increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by our potential lenders not to extend credit. An inability to successfully access the capital markets could limit our ability to grow our business and fully execute our business strategy and could decrease our earnings and liquidity. Additional equity issuances in the capital markets on unfavorable terms could also be dilutive to our existing shareholders. In addition, any dislocation or weakness in the capital and credit markets could adversely affect our lenders and could cause one or more of our lenders to be unwilling or unable to provide us with financing or to increase the costs of that financing. In addition, as regulatory capital requirements imposed on our lenders are increased, they may be required to limit, or increase the cost of, financing they provide to us. In general, this could potentially increase our financing costs and reduce our liquidity or require us to sell assets at an inopportune time or price. We cannot make assurances that we will be able to obtain any additional financing on favorable terms or at all.

We may not successfully align the maturities of our liabilities with the maturities of our assets, which could harm our operating results and financial condition.

Our general financing strategy is focused on the use of “match-funded” structures. This means that we seek to align the maturities of our liabilities with the maturities of our assets in order to manage the risks of being forced to refinance our liabilities prior to the maturities of our assets. In addition, we plan to match interest rates on our assets with like-kind borrowings, so fixed-rate investments are financed with fixed-rate borrowings and floating-rate assets are financed with floating-rate borrowings, directly or indirectly through the use of interest rate swaps, caps and other financial instruments or through a combination of these strategies. We may fail to appropriately employ match-funded structures on favorable terms, or at all. We may also determine not to pursue a fully match-funded strategy with respect to a portion of our financings for a variety of reasons. If we fail to appropriately employ match-funded strategies or determine not to pursue such a strategy, our exposure to interest rate volatility and exposure to matching liabilities prior to the maturity of the corresponding asset may increase substantially which could harm our operating results, liquidity and financial condition.

We may utilize non-recourse securitizations to finance our investments, which may expose us to risks that could result in losses.

We may utilize non-recourse securitizations of certain of our investments to generate cash for funding new investments and for other purposes. Such financing generally involves creating a special purpose vehicle, contributing a pool of our investments to the entity, and selling interests in the entity on a non-recourse basis to purchasers (whom we would expect to be willing to accept a lower interest rate to invest in investment-grade loan pools). The creditors of such a securitization vehicle will have no recourse against the Company’s other assets in the event of default. We would expect to retain all or a portion of the equity and potentially other tranches in the securitized pool of portfolio investments. Prior to any such financings, we may use other financing facilities to finance the acquisition of investments until a sufficient quantity of investments had been accumulated, at which time we would refinance these facilities through a securitization, such as a CLO. The inability to consummate securitizations to finance our investments could require us to seek other forms of less attractive financing, which could adversely affect our performance and our ability to grow our business. Moreover, conditions in the capital markets, including volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets, may not permit a securitization at any particular time or may make the issuance of any such securitization less attractive to us even when we do have sufficient eligible assets. We may also suffer losses if the value of the mortgage loans we acquire declines prior to securitization. In addition, we may suffer a loss due to the incurrence of transaction costs related to executing these transactions. To the extent that we incur a loss executing or participating in future securitizations for the reasons described above or for other reasons, it could materially and adversely impact our business and financial condition. The inability to securitize our portfolio may hurt our performance and our ability to grow our business.

84

Lenders often require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions.

Financing agreements that we enter into often contain covenants that limit our ability to further incur borrowings, restrict distributions or restrict our operations, such as prohibiting us from discontinuing insurance coverage or replacing our Advisor. These limitations decrease our operating flexibility and may impact our ability to achieve our operating objectives, including making distributions.

Our success depends on the availability of attractive investment opportunities.

Our loans typically have a term of about three to five years. As a result, a significant amount of our invested capital is repaid at loan maturity each year. Our operating results are dependent upon our ability to identify, structure, consummate, leverage, manage and realize attractive returns on, new loans and other investments. In general, the availability of attractive investment opportunities and, consequently, our operating results, will be affected by the level and volatility of interest rates, conditions in the financial markets, general economic conditions, the demand for investment opportunities in our target assets and the supply of capital for such investment opportunities. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in identifying and consummating attractive investments or that such investments, once made, will perform as anticipated.

Risks Related to Our Relationship with the Advisor

We depend on the Advisor to select our investments and otherwise conduct our business, and any material adverse change in its financial condition or our relationship with the Advisor could have a material adverse effect on our business and ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Our success is dependent upon our relationship with, and the performance of, the Advisor in the acquisition and management of our real estate portfolio and our corporate operations. The Advisor may suffer or become distracted by adverse financial or operational problems in connection with Benefit Street Partners’ business and activities unrelated to us and over which we have no control. Should the Advisor fail to allocate sufficient resources to perform its responsibilities to us for any reason, we may be unable to achieve our investment objectives or to pay distributions to our shareholders.

The termination or replacement of the Advisor could trigger a repayment event under the terms of any future indebtedness.

The termination or replacement of the Advisor may trigger repayment of outstanding amounts under any future indebtedness. If a repayment event occurs with respect to any such indebtedness, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

The Advisor’s inability to retain the services of key real estate professionals, including each member of the Advisor’s Investment Committee, could hurt our performance.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of certain key real estate professionals employed by the Advisor, including each member of the Advisor’s Investment Committee, each of whom would be difficult to replace. There is ever increasing competition among alternative asset firms, financial institutions, private equity firms, investment advisors, investment managers, real estate investment companies, REITs and other industry participants for hiring and retaining qualified investment professionals and there can be no assurance that such professionals will continue to be associated with us or the Advisor, or that replacements will perform well. Neither we nor the Advisor have employment agreements with these individuals and they may not remain associated with us. If any of these persons were to cease their association with us, our operating results could suffer. Our future success depends, in large part, upon the Advisor’s ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing professionals. If the Advisor loses or is unable to obtain the services of highly skilled professionals, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered.

85

Large shareholders may exert influence over our governance and affairs, including control over votes requiring shareholder approval, and our affiliation with such large shareholders may impact our ability to enter into certain transactions.

To the extent a large proportion of Common Shares are held by a small number of common shareholders (or a single common shareholder), such shareholders may be able to exert influence over our governance and policies and may have significant voting influence on votes requiring shareholder approval.

Additionally, upon the initial closing of our private offering and for a period of time thereafter, we expect that an open-end investment company registered under the 1940 Act, and managed by an affiliate of our Advisor, will hold over 50% of our outstanding Common Shares. Because of the significant percentage of our Common Shares expected to be held by this registered investment company, such entity may be deemed to control us for purposes of the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act generally prohibits affiliates of a registered investment company from engaging in certain types of transactions with the registered investment company or a company controlled by a registered investment company, absent an exemption. As a BDC, similar affiliated transaction restrictions already apply to us; however, the scope of potential affiliates to which such transaction restrictions apply will be broader than if the registered investment company did not control us for 1940 Act purposes, potentially expanding the types of transactions that we will not be able to engage in as a result. One or more other open-end investment companies managed by affiliates of our Advisor also may invest in our Common Shares in the future.

Absent an exemption or exemptive order, the 1940 Act may restrict transactions in which we might purchase investments from, or sell investments to, applicable affiliates or transactions in which we might co-invest side-by-side with applicable affiliates. The Advisor and its affiliates have received the Order, which will permit us to co-invest with one or more BDCs and/or other funds advised by our Advisor and its affiliates, but will not extend to certain funds that we may be affiliated with due to the large investment by the registered investment company discussed above. Co-investments made under the Order are subject to compliance with the conditions and other requirements contained in the Order. Included among such conditions is a requirement that if the Advisor, its principals, or any person controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Advisor or its principals (including the registered investment company managed by an affiliate of our Advisor that is expected to invest substantially in us), and affiliated funds managed by affiliates of the Advisor, own in the aggregate more than 25% of the shares of us, then they will vote such shares as directed by an independent third party when voting on (1) the election of directors; (2) the removal of one or more directors; or (3) any other matter under either the 1940 Act or applicable state law affecting a board’s composition, size or manner of election. The Advisor and its affiliates have applied for a new exemptive order which would supersede the Order if granted. Included among such conditions in the application for the new exemptive order is a similar requirement that if the Advisor, its principals, or any person controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Advisor or its principals (including the registered investment company managed by an affiliate of our Advisor that is expected to invest substantially in us), and affiliated funds managed by affiliates of the Advisor, own in the aggregate more than 25% of the shares of us, then they will vote such shares in the percentages as our other shareholders when voting on (1) the election of directors; (2) the removal of one or more directors; or (3) any other matter under either the 1940 Act or applicable state law affecting a board’s composition, size or manner of election.

Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest

Various potential and actual conflicts of interest will arise, and these conflicts may not be identified or resolved in a manner favorable to us.

Various potential and actual conflicts of interest will arise as a result of our overall investment activities and the overall investment activities of the Advisor and their affiliates. The following risk factors enumerate certain but not all potential conflicts of interest that should be carefully evaluated before making an investment in us. Benefit Street Partners and its personnel may in the future engage in further activities that may result in additional conflicts of interest not addressed below. If any matter arises that we and our affiliates (including the

86

Advisor) determine in our good faith judgment constitutes an actual conflict of interest, we and our affiliates (including the Advisor) may take such action as we determine in good faith may be necessary or appropriate to ameliorate the conflict. Transactions between us and Benefit Street Partners or its affiliates will require approval by our Board of Trustees, including a majority of our Independent Trustees in accordance with our Declaration of Trust. There can be no assurance that our Board of Trustees or Benefit Street Partners will identify or resolve all conflicts of interest in a manner that is favorable to us.

The Advisor faces a conflict of interest because the fees it receives for services performed are based in part on our NAV, which the Advisor is ultimately responsible for determining.

The Advisor is paid the Management Fee for its services that are based on the value of our portfolio of investments as determined in connection with our determination of NAV, which is calculated by the Advisor in accordance with our valuation guidelines. The calculation of our NAV includes certain subjective judgments with respect to estimating, for example, our accrued expenses, net portfolio income and liabilities, and therefore, our NAV may not correspond to realizable value upon a sale of those assets. The Advisor may benefit by us retaining ownership of our assets at times when our shareholders may be better served by the sale or disposition of our assets in order to avoid a reduction in our NAV. If our NAV is calculated in a way that is not reflective of our actual NAV, then the then-current transaction price of Common Shares on a given date may not accurately reflect the value of our portfolio, and Common Shares may be worth less than the then-current transaction price.

The fee structure set forth in the Investment Advisory Agreement may not create proper incentives for the Advisor.

We pay the Advisor a Management Fee regardless of our performance and an Incentive Fee that is based on our performance. The Incentive Fee may create an incentive for our Advisor to invest in assets with higher yield potential, which are generally riskier or more speculative, or sell an asset prematurely for a gain, in an effort to increase our short-term net income and thereby increase the Incentive Fees to which it is entitled.

The Advisor and its employees face competing demands relating to their time, and this may cause our operating results to suffer.

The Advisor and its employees are engaged in investment and investment management activities unrelated to us. We cannot provide any assurances regarding the amount of time our Advisor and its employees will dedicate to the management of our business. Each of our officers is also an employee of our Advisor, who has now or may be expected to have significant responsibilities for other investment vehicles currently managed by the Advisor and its affiliates. Consequently, we may not receive the level of support and assistance that we otherwise might receive if we were internally managed. Because these persons have competing demands on their time and resources, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities. If this occurs, the returns on our investments may suffer.

Benefit Street Partners is subject to a number of conflicts of interest, regulatory oversight and legal and contractual restrictions due to its multiple business lines, which may reduce the synergies that we expect to draw on or otherwise reduce the opportunities available to us.

Benefit Street Partners and its affiliates are involved in a number of other businesses and activities, which may result in conflicts of interest or other obligations that are disadvantageous to us. Specified policies and procedures implemented by Benefit Street Partners to mitigate potential conflicts of interest and address certain regulatory requirements and contractual restrictions will from time to time reduce the synergies across Benefit Street Partners’ various businesses that we expect to draw on for purposes of pursuing attractive investment opportunities. Because Benefit Street Partners has many different asset management businesses, including a capital markets group, it is subject to a number of actual and potential conflicts of interest, greater regulatory oversight and subject to more legal and contractual restrictions than that to which it would otherwise be subject if

87

it had just one line of business. In addressing these conflicts and regulatory, legal and contractual requirements across its various businesses, Benefit Street Partners has implemented certain policies and procedures (e.g., information walls) that reduce the positive synergies that we expect to utilize for purposes of finding attractive investments. For example, Benefit Street Partners will from time to time come into possession of material, non-public information with respect to companies in which its private equity business may be considering making an investment or companies that are clients of Benefit Street Partners. As a consequence, that information, which could be of benefit to us, might become restricted to those respective businesses and otherwise be unavailable to us. In addition, to the extent that Benefit Street Partners is in possession of material, non-public information or is otherwise restricted from trading in certain securities, we generally also are deemed to be in possession of such information or otherwise restricted. This could reduce the investment opportunities available to us, prevent us from exiting an investment or otherwise limit our investment flexibility. Additionally, the terms of confidentiality or other agreements with or related to companies in which any Benefit Street Partners fund has or has considered making an investment or which is otherwise a client of Benefit Street Partners will from time to time restrict or otherwise limit our ability to make investments in or otherwise engage in businesses or activities competitive with such companies. Benefit Street Partners may enter into one or more strategic relationships, in certain regions or with respect to certain types of investments that, although intended to provide greater opportunities for us, may require us to share such opportunities or otherwise limit the amount of an opportunity we can otherwise take.

Benefit Street Partners and its affiliates engage in a broad spectrum of activities, including a broad range of activities relating to investments in the real estate industry, and have invested or committed billions of dollars in capital through various investment funds, managed accounts and other vehicles affiliated with Benefit Street Partners. In the ordinary course of their business activities, Benefit Street Partners and its affiliates may engage in activities where the interests of certain divisions of Benefit Street Partners and its affiliates, or the interests of their clients may conflict with the interests of our shareholders. Certain of these divisions and entities affiliated with the Advisor have or may have an investment strategy similar to ours and therefore may engage in competing activities with us. In particular, various Benefit Street Partners opportunistic and substantially stabilized real estate funds and other investment vehicles seek to invest in a broad range of real estate investments.

Certain Other BSP Accounts have similar or overlapping investment objectives and guidelines, and we will not be allocated certain opportunities and may be allocated only opportunities with lower relative returns.

Through Other BSP Accounts, Benefit Street Partners currently invests and plans to continue to invest third-party capital in a wide variety of investment opportunities in the United States and globally. There will be overlap of CRE debt and other investment opportunities with certain Other BSP Accounts that are actively investing and similar overlap with future Other BSP Accounts. See “—Benefit Street Partners may raise or manage Other BSP Accounts which could result in the reallocation of Benefit Street Partners personnel and the direction of potential investments to such Other BSP Accounts” below. This overlap will from time to time create conflicts of interest. Additionally, in certain circumstances investment opportunities suitable for us will not be presented to us and there will be one or more investment opportunities where our participation is restricted.

With respect to Other BSP Accounts with investment objectives or guidelines that overlap with ours but that do not have priority over us, investment opportunities are allocated among us and one or more Other BSP Accounts in accordance with Benefit Street Partners’ prevailing policies and procedures on a basis that the Advisor and its affiliates believe to be fair and reasonable in their sole discretion, which may be on an alternating or co-invest basis subject to the 1940 Act, rules and regulations thereunder, no-action letters, SEC guidance and exemptive relief.

While the Advisor will seek to manage potential conflicts of interest in a fair and reasonable manner as required the Investment Advisory Agreement, the portfolio strategies employed by the Advisor or their affiliates in managing the Other BSP Accounts could conflict with the strategies employed by the Advisor in managing our business and may adversely affect the marketability, exit strategy, prices and availability of the properties,

88

securities and instruments in which we invest, subject to the 1940 Act, rules and regulations thereunder, no-action letters, SEC guidelines and exemptive relief. Benefit Street Partners or their affiliates may also give advice to the Other BSP Accounts that may differ from advice given to us even though their investment objectives or guidelines may be the same or similar to ours.

The amount of performance-based compensation charged and management fees paid by us may be less than or exceed the amount of performance-based compensation charged or management fees paid by Other BSP Accounts. Such variation may create an incentive for Benefit Street Partners to allocate a greater percentage of an investment opportunity to us or such Other BSP Accounts, as the case may be.

Under certain circumstances, the Advisor may determine not to pursue some or all of an investment opportunity within our investment objectives and guidelines, including without limitation, as a result of our prior investments, business or other reasons applicable to us, Other BSP Accounts, Benefit Street Partners or its affiliates.

Under certain circumstances, the Advisor may determine not to pursue some or all of an investment opportunity within our investment objectives and guidelines, including without limitation, as a result of business, reputational or other reasons applicable to us, Other BSP Accounts, Benefit Street Partners or its affiliates. In addition, the Advisor may determine that we should not pursue some or all of an investment opportunity, including, by way of example and without limitation, because we have already invested sufficient capital in the investment, sector, industry, geographic region or markets in question, as determined by the Advisor, or the investment is not appropriate for us for other reasons as determined by the Advisor. In any such case Benefit Street Partners could, thereafter, offer such opportunity to other parties, including Other BSP Accounts, portfolio entities, joint venture partners, related parties or third parties. Any such Other BSP Accounts may be advised by a different Benefit Street Partners business group with a different investment committee, which could determine an investment opportunity to be more attractive than the Advisor believes to be the case. In any event, there can be no assurance that the Advisor’s assessment will prove correct or that the performance of any investments actually pursued by us will be comparable to any investment opportunities that are not pursued by us. Benefit Street Partners, including its personnel, may receive compensation from any such party that makes the investment, including an allocation of carried interest or referral fees, and any such compensation could be greater than amounts paid by us to the Advisor. In some cases, Benefit Street Partners earns greater fees when Other BSP Accounts participate alongside or instead of us in an investment.

The Advisor makes good faith determinations for allocation decisions based on expectations that may prove inaccurate. Information unavailable to the Advisor, or circumstances not foreseen by the Advisor at the time of allocation, may cause an investment opportunity to yield a different return than expected. There is no assurance that any conflicts arising out of the foregoing will be resolved in our favor. Benefit Street Partners is entitled to amend its policies and procedures at any time without prior notice or our consent.

To the extent we acquire investments through joint ventures with Other BSP Accounts, such investments will be allocated as described above, and we may be allocated interests in such joint ventures that are smaller than the interests of the Other BSP Accounts. Generally, we expect the level of control we have with respect to any joint venture will correspond to our economic interest in such joint venture. This may prevent us from receiving an allocation with respect to certain investment opportunities that are suitable for both us and one or more Other BSP Accounts.

Benefit Street Partners may have an opportunity to acquire a portfolio or pool of assets, securities and instruments that it determines in its sole discretion should be divided and allocated among us and Other BSP Accounts. Such allocations generally would be based on its assessment of the expected returns and risk profile of the portfolio and the assets therein. For example, some of the assets in a pool may have an opportunistic return profile not appropriate for us. Also, a pool may contain both debt and equity instruments that Benefit Street Partners determines should be allocated to different funds. In all of these situations, the combined purchase price

89

paid to a seller would be allocated among the multiple assets, securities and instruments in the pool and therefore among Other BSP Accounts and us acquiring any of the assets, securities and instruments. Similarly, there will likely be circumstances in which we and Other BSP Accounts will sell assets in a single or related transactions to a buyer. In some cases a counterparty will require an allocation of value in the purchase or sale contract, though Benefit Street Partners could determine such allocation of value is not accurate and should not be relied upon. Benefit Street Partners will generally rely upon internal analysis to determine the ultimate allocation of value, though it could also obtain third party valuation reports. Regardless of the methodology for allocating value, Benefit Street Partners will have conflicting duties to us and Other BSP Accounts when they buy or sell assets together in a portfolio, including as a result of different financial incentives Benefit Street Partners has with respect to different vehicles, most clearly when the fees and compensation, including performance-based compensation, earned from the different vehicles differ. There can be no assurance that our investment will not be valued or allocated a purchase price that is higher or lower than it might otherwise have been allocated if such investment were acquired or sold independently rather than as a component of a portfolio shared with Other BSP Accounts.

Benefit Street Partners may raise or manage Other BSP Accounts which could result in the reallocation of Benefit Street Partners personnel and the direction of potential investments to such Other BSP Accounts.

Benefit Street Partners reserves the right to raise and/or manage Other BSP Accounts, including opportunistic and stabilized and substantially stabilized real estate funds or separate accounts, dedicated managed accounts, investments suitable for lower risk, lower return funds or higher risk, higher return funds, real estate debt obligation and trading investment vehicles, real estate funds primarily making investments in a single sector of the real estate investment space (e.g., office, industrial, retail or multifamily) or making non-controlling investments in public and private debt and equity securities or investment funds that may have the same or similar investment objectives or guidelines as us, investment funds formed for specific geographical areas or investments, including those raised by us and one or more managed accounts (or other similar arrangements structured through an entity) for the benefit of one or more specific investors (or related group of investors) which, in each case, may have investment objectives or guidelines that overlap with ours. See “—Certain Other BSP Accounts have similar or overlapping investment objectives and guidelines, and we will not be allocated certain opportunities and may be allocated only opportunities with lower relative returns.” In particular, we expect that there will be overlap of real estate debt and real estate-related debt and equity securities investment opportunities with certain Other BSP Accounts that are actively investing and similar overlap with future Other BSP Accounts. The closing of an Other BSP Account could result in the reallocation of Benefit Street Partners personnel, including reallocation of existing real estate professionals, to such Other BSP Account. In addition, potential investments that may be suitable for us may be directed toward such Other BSP Account.

Benefit Street Partners’ potential involvement in financing a third party’s purchase of assets from us could lead to potential or actual conflicts of interest.

We may from time to time dispose of all or a portion of an investment by way of a third-party purchaser’s bid where Benefit Street Partners or one or more Other BSP Accounts is providing financing as part of such bid or acquisition of the investment or underlying assets thereof. This may include the circumstance where Benefit Street Partners or one or more Other BSP Accounts is making commitments to provide financing at or prior to the time such third-party purchaser commits to purchase such investments or assets from us. Such involvement of Benefit Street Partners or one or more Other BSP Accounts as such a provider of debt financing in connection with the potential acquisition of portfolio investments by third parties from us may give rise to potential or actual conflicts of interest.

Certain principals and employees may be involved in and have a greater financial interest in the performance of other Benefit Street Partners funds or accounts, and such activities may create conflicts of interest in making investment decisions on our behalf.

Certain of the principals and employees of the Advisor may be subject to a variety of conflicts of interest relating to their responsibilities to us and the management of our portfolio. Such individuals may serve in an

90

advisory capacity to other managed accounts or investment vehicles, as members of an investment or advisory committee or a Board of Trustees (or similar such capacity) for one or more investment funds, corporations, foundations or other organizations. Such positions may create a conflict between the services and advice provided to such entities and the responsibilities owed to us. The other managed accounts and investment funds in which such individuals may become involved may have investment objectives that overlap with ours. Furthermore, certain principals and employees of the Advisor may have a greater financial interest in the performance of such other funds or accounts than our performance. Such involvement may create conflicts of interest in making investments on our behalf and such other funds and accounts. Such principals and employees will seek to limit any such conflicts in a manner that is in accordance with their fiduciary duties to us and such organizations.

The Advisor may face conflicts of interests in choosing our service providers and certain service providers may provide services to the Advisor or Benefit Street Partners on more favorable terms than those payable by us.

Certain advisors and other service providers or their affiliates (including accountants, administrators, lenders, bankers, brokers, attorneys, consultants, title agents and investment or commercial banking firms) that provide goods or services to us, Benefit Street Partners or certain entities in which we have an investment may also provide goods or services to or have business, personal, financial or other relationships with Benefit Street Partners and its other businesses. Such advisors and service providers may be investors in us, affiliates of the Advisor, sources of investment opportunities or co-investors or commercial counterparties or entities in which Benefit Street Partners or Other BSP Accounts have an investment, and payments by us may indirectly benefit Street Partners or such Other BSP Accounts. Additionally, certain employees of the Advisor may have family members or relatives employed by such advisors and service providers. The Advisor or its affiliates may also provide administrative services to us. These relationships may influence us and the Advisor in deciding whether to select or recommend such a service provider to perform services for us or a portfolio property (the cost of which will generally be borne directly or indirectly by us or such portfolio property, as applicable).

It is expected that certain Benefit Street Partners affiliates will also provide other services in respect of our investments from time to time, including, but not limited to administrative corporate services. Employees of these affiliates may also act as our executive officers and may also receive performance-based compensation in respect of our investments. The fees and expenses of such Benefit Street Partners-affiliated service providers (and, if applicable, their employees) are borne by our investments and there is no related offset to the Management Fee we pay to the Advisor. While Benefit Street Partners believes that any such affiliated service providers, when engaged, generally provide (or will provide) services at rates equal to or better than those provided by third parties (even in jurisdictions where insurance rates are statutorily determined), there is an inherent conflict of interest that may incentivize Benefit Street Partners to engage its affiliated service provider over a third party.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, transactions relating to our real estate debt and real estate-related debt and equity securities that require the use of a service provider generally is allocated to service providers on the basis of best execution, the evaluation of which includes, among other considerations, such service provider’s provision of certain investment-related services and research that the Advisor believes to be of benefit to us. Service providers or their affiliates often charge different rates or have different arrangements for different types of services. With respect to service providers, for example, the fee for a given type of work may vary depending on the complexity of the matter as well as the expertise required and demands placed on the service provider. Therefore, to the extent the types of services used by us are different from those used by Benefit Street Partners and its affiliates, the Advisor or its affiliates may pay different amounts or rates than those paid by us. However, the Advisor and its affiliates have a longstanding practice of not entering into any arrangements with service providers that could provide for lower rates or discounts than those available to us, or other Benefit Street Partners investment vehicles for the same services.

91

The personnel of the Advisor may trade in securities for their own accounts, subject to restrictions applicable to Benefit Street Partners personnel.

The officers, trustees, members, managers and employees of the Advisor may trade in securities for their own accounts, subject to restrictions and reporting requirements as may be required by law and Benefit Street Partners policies, or otherwise determined from time to time by the Advisor. Such personal securities transactions and investments could, in certain circumstances, result in conflicts of interest, including to the extent they relate to (i) a company in which we hold or acquire an interest (either directly through a privately negotiated investment or indirectly through the purchase of securities or other traded instruments related thereto) and (ii) entities that have interests which are adverse to ours or pursue similar investment opportunities as us.

Risks Related to our REIT Status and Certain Other Tax Items

Our failure to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year would subject us to U.S. federal income tax and applicable state and local taxes, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

We intend to elect and qualify to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2024. We do not intend to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) that we qualify to be taxed as a REIT. The U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs are complex. Judicial and administrative interpretations of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing REIT qualification are limited. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet, on an ongoing basis, various tests regarding the nature of our assets and our income, the ownership of our outstanding shares, and the amount of our distributions. New legislation, court decisions or administrative guidance, in each case possibly with retroactive effect, may make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. Thus, while we intend to operate so that we will qualify as a REIT as long as our Board of Trustees determines it is in our best interest, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, no assurance can be given that we will so qualify for any particular year. These considerations also might restrict the types of assets that we can acquire in the future.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and we do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we would be required to pay U.S. federal income tax and applicable state and local income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates, and distributions to our shareholders would not be deductible by us in determining our taxable income. In such a case, we might need to borrow money or sell assets in order to pay our taxes. Our payment of income tax would decrease the amount of our income available for distribution to our shareholders. Furthermore, if we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we no longer would be required to distribute substantially all of our REIT taxable income to our shareholders. In addition, unless we were eligible for certain statutory relief provisions, we could not re-elect to be taxed as a REIT until the fifth calendar year following the year in which we failed to qualify.

Qualifying as a REIT involves highly technical and complex provisions of the Code.

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions and the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist. Even a technical or inadvertent violation could jeopardize our REIT qualification. Our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, shareholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. In addition, our ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT may depend in part on the actions of third parties over which we have no control or only limited influence, including in cases where we own an equity interest in an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT.

92

Our Board of Trustees is authorized to revoke our REIT election without shareholder approval, which may cause adverse consequences to our shareholders.

Our Declaration of Trust authorizes our Board of Trustees to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to qualify as a REIT. Our Board of Trustees has duties to us and our shareholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in our best interests. In this event, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and we would no longer be required to distribute most of our net income to our shareholders, which may cause a reduction in the total return to our shareholders.

Ordinary dividends paid by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates applicable to “qualified dividend income.”

Dividends paid by C corporations to domestic shareholders that are individuals, trusts and estates currently are generally taxed at a maximum federal income tax rate of 20% as qualified dividend income. Dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for the reduced rates applicable to qualified dividend income, except to the extent designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income. The more favorable rates currently applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in shares of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, even taking into account the deduction of up to 20% of qualified REIT dividends received by non-corporate U.S. shareholders in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2026.

Failure to make required distributions would subject us to tax, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our shareholders each year dividends equal to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which is computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction, excludes net capital gain and does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). To the extent that we satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed income (including net capital gain). In addition, we will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which our distributions in any calendar year are less than minimum amounts specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. We intend to make distributions to our shareholders in a manner that will satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and avoid corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax.

Our taxable income may substantially exceed our net income as determined based on GAAP or differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash may occur. For example, we may be required to accrue income on mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and other types of debt securities or interests in debt securities before we receive any payments of interest or principal on such assets. We may also acquire distressed debt investments that are subsequently modified by agreement with the borrower either directly or indirectly. As a result of amendments to a debt investment, we may be required to recognize taxable income to the extent that the principal amount of the modified debt exceeds our cost of purchasing it prior to the amendments. We may be required under the terms of the indebtedness that we incur, whether to private lenders or pursuant to government programs, to use cash received from interest payments to make principal payments on that indebtedness, with the effect that we will recognize income but will not have a corresponding amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders. We generally will be required to take certain amounts into income no later than the time they are reflected on certain financial statements. We may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year and find it difficult or impossible to meet the REIT distribution requirement in certain circumstances.

In such circumstances, we may be required to: (i) sell assets in adverse market conditions, (ii) borrow on unfavorable terms, (iii) distribute amounts that would otherwise be applied to make investments or repay debt or

93

(iv) make a taxable distribution of our shares as part of a distribution in which shareholders may elect to receive shares or (subject to a limit measured as a percentage of the total distribution) cash, in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirement. Thus, compliance with the REIT distribution requirement may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of our Common Shares. We may be required to use cash reserves, incur debt, or liquidate non-cash assets at rates or at times that we regard as unfavorable to satisfy the distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax in that year.

The ownership limits that apply to REITs, as prescribed by the Code and by our Declaration of Trust, may restrict our business combination opportunities.

In order for us to qualify as a REIT, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) at any time during the last half of each taxable year after the first year for which we elect to qualify be taxed as a REIT. Additionally, 100 or more persons must beneficially own our shares during at least 335 days of a taxable year (other than the first taxable year for which we elect to be taxed as a REIT). Our Declaration of Trust, with certain exceptions, authorizes our Board of Trustees to take such actions as are necessary or appropriate to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Our Declaration of Trust also provides that, unless exempted by our Board of Trustees prospectively or retroactively, no person may own more than 9.9% by value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding Common Shares or 9.9% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of all classes and series. Our Board of Trustees may, in its sole discretion, subject to such conditions as it may determine and the receipt of certain representations and undertakings, prospectively or retroactively, waive the ownership limits or establish a different limit on ownership, or excepted holder limit, for a particular shareholder if the shareholder’s ownership in excess of the ownership limits would not result in our being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code or otherwise failing to qualify as a REIT. These ownership limits could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control of our Company that might involve a premium price for our Common Shares or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.

Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may face tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.

Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, franchise, property and transfer taxes. See “Item 1. Business—Certain U.S. Tax Considerations—REITs in General.” In addition, any domestic TRSs we own will be subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate taxes. In order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, or to avoid the imposition of a 100% tax that applies to certain gains derived by a REIT from sales of inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, we may hold some of our assets through taxable subsidiary corporations, including domestic TRSs. Any taxes paid by such subsidiary corporations would decrease the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive investment opportunities or financing or hedging strategies.

Any income from a hedging transaction we enter into (1) in the normal course of our business primarily to manage risk of interest rate or price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, to acquire or carry real estate assets, which is clearly identified as specified in the Treasury regulations before the close of the day on which it was acquired, originated, or entered into, including gain from the sale or disposition of such a transaction, (2) primarily to manage risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that would be qualifying income under the 75% or 95% gross income tests (as discussed further below), or (3) to hedge existing hedging transactions after all or part of the hedged indebtedness or property has been disposed of, which is clearly identified as such before the close of the day on which it was acquired, originated, or entered into, will not constitute gross income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. Our annual gross income from

94

non-qualifying hedges, together with any other income not generated from qualifying real estate assets, cannot exceed 25% of our gross income (excluding for this purpose, gross income from qualified hedges). In addition, our aggregate gross income from non-qualifying hedges, fees, and certain other non-qualifying sources cannot exceed 5% of our annual gross income (excluding for this purpose, gross income from qualified hedges). As a result, we might have to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise not want to bear. We may even be required to altogether forego investments we might otherwise make. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our investment performance.

Complying with REIT requirements may force us to liquidate or restructure otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify as a REIT, we generally must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter at least 75% of the value of our total assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, as well as shares of another REIT. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets or securities of a TRS of ours) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. The 10% value asset test does not apply to “straight debt” securities. Debt will generally be treated as “straight debt” for these purposes if the debt is a written unconditional promise to pay on demand or on a specified date a certain sum of money, the debt is not convertible, directly or indirectly, into stock, and the interest rate and the interest payment dates of the debt are not contingent on the profits, the borrower’s discretion, or similar factors. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets or securities of a TRS of ours) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 20% of the value of our total securities can be represented by stock and securities of one or more TRSs, and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can be represented by “nonqualified publicly offered REIT debt instruments.” If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of such calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate from our portfolio otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our shareholders.

We may choose to pay dividends in the form of our own shares, in which case our shareholders may be required to pay income taxes in excess of the cash dividends received.

We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in cash or our shares. Shareholders (that are not otherwise exempt from U.S. federal income tax) receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend as ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. shareholder may be required to pay income taxes with respect to such dividends in excess of the cash dividends received. If a U.S. shareholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the NAV per share of our Common Shares at the time of the sale. In addition, in such case, a U.S. shareholder could have a capital loss with respect to the shares sold that could not be used to offset such dividend income.

Furthermore, with respect to certain non-U.S. shareholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in shares.

95

Characterization of any repurchase agreements we enter into to finance our portfolio assets as sales for tax purposes rather than as secured lending transactions would adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

We may enter into repurchase agreements with a variety of counterparties to achieve our desired amount of leverage for the assets in which we intend to invest. When we enter into a repurchase agreement, we generally sell assets to our counterparty to the agreement and receive cash from the counterparty. The counterparty is obligated to resell the assets back to us at the end of the term of the transaction. We believe that for U.S. federal income tax purposes we will be treated as the owner of the assets that are the subject of repurchase agreements and that the repurchase agreements will be treated as secured lending transactions notwithstanding that such agreements may transfer record ownership of the assets to the counterparty during the term of the agreement. It is possible, however, that the IRS could successfully assert that we did not own these assets during the term of the repurchase agreements, in which case we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

The failure of a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset would adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

We may originate or acquire mezzanine loans, which are loans secured by equity interests in a partnership or limited liability company that directly or indirectly owns real property. In Revenue Procedure 2003-65, the IRS provided a safe harbor pursuant to which a mezzanine loan, if it meets each of the requirements contained in the Revenue Procedure, will be treated by the IRS as a real estate asset for purposes of the asset tests, and interest derived from the mezzanine loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Although the Revenue Procedure provides a safe harbor on which taxpayers may rely, it does not prescribe rules of substantive tax law. We may originate or acquire mezzanine loans that may not meet all of the requirements for reliance on this safe harbor. In the event we own a mezzanine loan that does not meet the safe harbor, the IRS could challenge such loan’s treatment as a real estate asset for purposes of the asset and income tests, and if such a challenge were sustained, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

We may be required to report taxable income for certain investments in excess of the economic income we ultimately realize from them.

We may acquire interests in debt instruments in the secondary market for less than their face amount. The discount at which such interests in debt instruments are acquired may reflect doubts about the ultimate collectability of the underlying loans rather than current market interest rates. The amount of such discount will nevertheless generally be treated as “market discount” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accrued market discount is reported as income when, and to the extent that, any payment of principal of the debt instrument is made. Payments on certain debt instruments may be made monthly, and consequently accrued market discount may have to be included in income each month as if the debt instrument were assured of ultimately being collected in full. If we collect less on the debt instrument than our purchase price plus the market discount we had previously reported as income, we may not be able to benefit from any offsetting loss deductions in a subsequent taxable year.

Similarly, some of the securities that we acquire may have been issued with original issue discount. We will be required to report such original issue discount based on a constant yield method and will be taxed based on the assumption that all future projected payments due on such securities will be made. If such securities turn out not to be fully collectible, an offsetting loss deduction will become available only in the later year that uncollectability is provable.

Finally, in the event that any debt instruments or other securities acquired by us are delinquent as to mandatory principal and interest payments, or in the event payments with respect to a particular debt instrument are not made when due, we may nonetheless be required to continue to recognize the unpaid interest as taxable income as it accrues, despite doubt as to its ultimate collectability. Similarly, we may be required to accrue interest income with respect to subordinate mortgage-backed securities at their stated rate regardless of whether

96

corresponding cash payments are received or are ultimately collectible. In each case, while we would in general ultimately have an offsetting loss deduction available to us when such interest was determined to be uncollectible, the utility of that deduction could depend on our having taxable income in that later year or thereafter.

Due to each of these potential timing differences between income recognition or expense deduction and the related cash receipts or disbursements, there is a significant risk that we may have substantial taxable income in excess of cash available for distribution. In that event, we may need to borrow funds or take other actions to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements.

Certain financing activities may subject us to U.S. federal income tax and could have negative tax consequences for our shareholders.

We may enter into financing transactions that could result in us or a portion of our assets being treated as a “taxable mortgage pool” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we were to enter into such a transaction, we would be taxed at the highest U.S. federal corporate income tax rate on a portion of the income, referred to as “excess inclusion income,” that is allocable to shareholders that are “disqualified organizations,” which are generally certain cooperatives, governmental entities and tax-exempt organizations that are exempt from tax on unrelated business taxable income. To the extent that Common Shares owned by “disqualified organizations” are held in record name by a broker-dealer or other nominee, the broker-dealer or other nominee would be liable for the U.S. federal corporate level tax on the portion of our excess inclusion income allocable to the Common Shares held by the broker-dealer or other nominee on behalf of the “disqualified organizations.” A regulated investment company (“RIC”) or other pass-through entity owning our Common Shares in record name will be subject to tax at the highest U.S. federal corporate tax rate on any excess inclusion income allocated to their owners that are disqualified organizations.

In addition, if we realize excess inclusion income, our shareholders will be subject to special tax rules with respect to their allocable shares of our excess inclusion income. For example, excess inclusion income cannot be offset by net operating losses of our shareholders. If a shareholder is a tax-exempt entity and not a disqualified organization, excess inclusion income is fully taxable as unrelated business taxable income. If a shareholder is a non-U.S. person, excess inclusion income would be subject to a 30% withholding tax without any reduction or exemption pursuant to any otherwise applicable income tax treaty. If the shareholder is a REIT, RIC, common trust fund or other pass-through entity, our allocable share of our excess inclusion income could be considered excess inclusion income of such entity.

Distributions or gain on sale may be treated as unrelated business taxable income to U.S. tax-exempt investors in certain circumstances.

If (1) all or a portion of our assets are subject to the rules relating to taxable mortgage pools and the allocation of “excess inclusion income”, (2) we are a “pension-held REIT,” (3) a U.S. tax-exempt shareholder has incurred debt to purchase or hold our Common Shares, or (4) any residual real estate mortgage investment conduit (“REMIC”) interests we hold or any of our qualified REIT subsidiaries that is treated as a taxable mortgage pool generate “excess inclusion income,” then a portion of the distributions to a U.S. tax-exempt shareholder and, in the case of condition (3), gains realized on the sale of Common Shares by such tax-exempt shareholder, may be subject to U.S. federal income tax as unrelated business taxable income under the Code.

The tax on prohibited transactions will limit our ability to engage in transactions, including certain methods of securitizing mortgage loans, that would be treated as sales for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% tax unless a safe harbor exception applies. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, but including mortgage loans, held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary

97

course of business. We might be subject to this tax if we were to sell or securitize loans in a manner that was treated as a sale of the loans as inventory for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, in order to avoid the prohibited transactions tax, we may choose not to engage in certain sales of loans, other than through a TRS, and we may be required to limit the structures we use for our securitization transactions, even though such sales or structures might otherwise be beneficial for us.

Liquidation of our assets may jeopardize our REIT qualification.

To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate our portfolio assets to repay obligations to our lenders, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our qualification as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% tax on any resultant gain if we sell assets in transactions that are considered to be prohibited transactions.

Our ownership of, and relationship with, any TRS which we may form or acquire will be subject to limitations, and a failure to comply with the limitations could jeopardize our REIT status and may result in the application of a 100% excise tax.

A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may earn income that would not be qualifying income if earned directly by the parent REIT. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS, directly or indirectly, owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will in turn automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. A TRS will pay U.S. federal, state and local income tax at the relevant corporate income tax rates on any income that it earns, and there is no requirement that a TRS make a distribution of its taxable income to the parent REIT. The Code also imposes a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.

Although we plan to monitor our investments in TRSs (if any), there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the 20% limitation or avoid the application of the 100% excise tax, each as discussed above.

Investments in certain financial assets will not qualify as “real estate assets” or generate “qualifying income” for purposes of the 75% real estate asset and gross income qualification requirements and, as a result, our ability to make such investments will be limited.

To qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must comply with certain asset and gross income qualification requirements. Because of these REIT qualification requirements, our ability to acquire certain financial assets such as asset-backed securities, or ABS, will be limited, or we may be required to make such investments through a TRS. In the event that we were to make such an investment through a domestic TRS, any income or gain from such ABS would generally be subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income tax, which may reduce the cash flow generated by us and our subsidiaries in the aggregate, and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. Our ability to make such investments through a TRS is limited, however, because of the REIT qualification requirement that no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be comprised of stock and securities held by us in TRSs, and that 75% of our gross income must come from certain specified real estate sources.

Legislative, regulatory or administrative changes could adversely affect us, our shareholders or our borrowers.

Legislative, regulatory or administrative changes could be enacted or promulgated at any time, either prospectively or with retroactive effect, and may adversely affect us, our shareholders or our borrowers.

Further changes to the tax laws are possible. In particular, the federal income taxation of REITs may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, administrative or judicial action at any time. There can

98

be no assurance that future tax law changes will not increase income tax rates, impose new limitations on deductions, credits or other tax benefits, or make other changes that may adversely affect our business, cash flows or financial performance or the tax impact to a shareholder of an investment in our Common Shares.

Investors are urged to consult with their tax advisor with respect to the impact of any regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our Common Shares.

Restrictions on the deduction of all of our interest expense could prevent us from satisfying the REIT distribution requirements and avoiding the incurrence of income or excise taxes.

Rules enacted as part of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 may limit our ability (and the ability of entities that are not treated as disregarded entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes and in which we hold an interest) to deduct interest expense. Under amended Section 163(j) of the Code, the deduction for business interest expense may be limited to the amount of the taxpayer’s business interest income plus 30% of the taxpayer’s “adjusted taxable income” unless the taxpayer’s gross receipts do not exceed $25 million per year during the applicable testing period or the taxpayer qualifies to elect and elects to be treated as an “electing real property trade or business.” A taxpayer’s adjusted taxable income will start with its taxable income and add back items of non-business income and expense, business interest income and business interest expense, net operating losses, any deductions for “qualified business income”. A taxpayer that is exempt from the interest expense limitations as an electing real property trade or business is ineligible for certain expensing benefits and is subject to less favorable depreciation rules for real property. The rules for business interest expense will apply to us and at the level of each entity in which or through which we invest that is not a disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To the extent that our interest expense is not deductible, our taxable income will be increased, as will our REIT distribution requirements and the amounts we need to distribute to avoid incurring income and excise taxes.

Foreclosures may impact our ability to qualify as a REIT and minimize tax liabilities.

If we foreclose, or consider foreclosing, on properties securing defaulted loans that we hold, we will have to consider the impact that taking ownership of such properties would have on our ability to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT and any tax liabilities attributable thereto if we continue to qualify as a REIT. In certain cases, the operation of real property will not generate qualifying rents from real property for purposes of the gross income tests, e.g., income from operation of a hotel. In certain circumstances, we will be able to make an election with the IRS to treat property we take possession of in a foreclosure as “foreclosure property.” If, and for so long as, such property qualifies as “foreclosure property,” income therefrom is treated as qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests and gain from the sale of such property will not be subject to the 100% prohibited transaction tax for dealer sales, regardless of our how short our holding period in such property is when we sell such property or other dealer sales considerations. On the other hand, net income with respect to a property for which we’ve made a foreclosure property election that would not otherwise be qualifying income for purposes of the gross income tests will be taxed at the highest U.S. federal corporate income tax rate. In certain circumstances, the IRS might argue that a particular property did not qualify for a foreclosure property election or that its status as foreclosure property terminated while we believed it continued to qualify, possibly causing us to fail one or both gross income tests or causing any gain from the sale of such property to be subject to the prohibited transaction tax.

Risks Related to our BDC Status

Any failure on our part to maintain our status as a BDC would reduce our operating flexibility.

If we do not remain a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility.

99

Regulations governing our operation as a BDC affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital.

We may issue debt securities or preferred shares and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as “senior securities,” up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. As a BDC, we currently are required to meet an asset coverage ratio of total assets to total borrowings and other senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any preferred share we may issue in the future, of at least 150%. This means that for every $100 of net assets, we may raise $200 from senior securities, such as borrowings or issuing preferred shares. If this ratio declines below 150%, the contractual arrangements governing these securities may require us to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous.

BDCs may issue and sell Common Shares at a price below net asset value per share only in limited circumstances, one of which is during the one-year period after shareholder approval. Although we currently do not have such authority, we may in the future seek to receive such authority on terms and conditions set forth in the corresponding proxy statement. There is no assurance such approvals will be obtained.

In the event we sell, or otherwise issue, our Common Shares at a price below net asset value per share, existing shareholders will experience net asset value dilution and the investors who acquire shares in such offering may thereafter experience the same type of dilution from subsequent offerings at a discount. For example, if we sell an additional 10% of our Common Shares at a 5% discount from net asset value, a shareholder who does not participate in that offering for its proportionate interest will suffer net asset value dilution of up to 0.5% or $5 per $1,000 of net asset value.

In addition to issuing securities to raise capital as described above, we may in the future securitize our loans to generate cash for funding new investments. To securitize loans, we may create a wholly-owned subsidiary, contribute a pool of loans to the subsidiary and have the subsidiary issue primarily investment grade debt securities to purchasers who we would expect would be willing to accept a substantially lower interest rate than the loans earn. If we choose to do so, we will comply with Section 61 of the 1940 and treat the subsidiary’s debt as our own for purposes of this section. If the subsidiary has an investment adviser, we will ensure such adviser complies with Section 15 of the 1940 Act as if it were an investment adviser to the Company pursuant to Section 2(a)(20) of the 1940 Act. We will ensure that the subsidiary complies with Sections 17 and 57 of the 1940 Act and will identify the subsidiary’s custodian, if any exists. We do not currently intend to create or acquire primary control of any entity which primarily engages in investment activities in securities or other assets, other than wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. We would retain all or a portion of the equity in the securitized pool of loans. Our retained equity would be exposed to any losses on the portfolio of loans before any of the debt securities would be exposed to such losses. An inability to successfully securitize our loan portfolio could limit our ability to grow our business and fully execute our business strategy and adversely affect our earnings, if any. Moreover, the successful securitization of our loan portfolio might expose us to losses as the residual loans in which we do not sell interests will tend to be those that are riskier and more apt to generate losses.

If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could fail to qualify as a BDC or be precluded from investing according to our current business strategy.

As a BDC, we may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. We believe that most of the investments that we may acquire in the future will constitute qualifying assets. However, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments, if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could be found to be in violation of the 1940 Act provisions applicable to BDCs. This would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules could prevent us from making follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies (which could result in the dilution of our position)

100

or could require us to dispose of investments at inappropriate times in order to come into compliance with the 1940 Act. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, and therefore will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in substantial losses.

Our ability to enter into transactions involving derivatives and financial commitment transactions may be limited.

In August 2022, Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, regarding the ability of a BDC (or a registered investment company) to use derivatives and other transactions that create future payment or delivery obligations (except reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions), became effective. Under the new rule, BDCs that make significant use of derivatives are required to operate subject to a value-at-risk leverage limit, adopt a derivatives risk management program and appoint a derivatives risk manager, and comply with various testing and board reporting requirements. These new requirements apply unless the BDC qualifies as a “limited derivatives user,” as defined under the adopted rules. Under the new rule, a BDC may enter into an unfunded commitment agreement that is not a derivatives transaction, such as an agreement to provide financing to a portfolio company, if the BDC has, among other things, a reasonable belief that, at the time it enters into such an agreement, it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all of its unfunded commitment agreements, in each case as it becomes due. We currently operate as a “limited derivatives user” which may limit our ability to use derivatives and/or enter into certain other financial contracts. Based on our anticipated use of derivatives primarily for interest rate hedging purposes, we expect to qualify as a limited derivatives user under the rule. However, we cannot assure investors that we will be treated as a limited derivatives user or that our approach to our use of derivatives will not change.

Any unrealized losses we experience on our portfolio may be an indication of future realized losses, which could reduce our income available for distribution.

As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at the fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to procedures adopted by, and under the oversight of, our Board of Trustees. Decreases in the fair value of our investments relative to amortized cost will be recorded as unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized losses in our portfolio could be an indication of a portfolio company’s inability to meet its repayment obligations to us with respect to the affected loans. This could result in realized losses in the future and ultimately in reductions of our income available for distribution in future periods. In addition, decreases in the fair value of our investments will reduce our NAV.

The Company may be precluded from investing in what the Advisor believes to be attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act.

As a BDC, the Company may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of its total assets are qualifying assets.

The Advisor believes that most of the investments that the Company may acquire in the future will constitute qualifying assets. However, the Company may be precluded from investing in what the Advisor believes to be attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act. If the Company does not invest a sufficient portion of its assets in qualifying assets, or if the SEC disagrees with the Advisor’s analysis that the targeted assets constitute “eligible portfolio companies” under the 1940 Act, the Company could violate the 1940 Act provisions applicable to BDCs. As a result of such violation, specific rules under the 1940 Act could prevent the Company, for example, from making follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies (which could result in the dilution of its position) or could require the Company to dispose of investments at inappropriate times in order to come into compliance with the 1940 Act. If the Company must dispose of such investments quickly, it could be difficult to do so on favorable terms. The Company may not be able to find a buyer for such investments and, even if the Company does find a buyer, the Company may have to sell the investments at a substantial loss. Any such outcomes would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

101

If the Company does not maintain its status as a BDC, it would be subject to regulation as a registered closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act. As a registered closed-end investment company, the Company would be subject to substantially more regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act which would significantly decrease the Company’s operating flexibility.

General Risk Factors

The past performance of the Advisor’s senior management is not a predictor of our future results.

Neither the track record of the senior management of the Advisor nor the performance of the Advisor will imply or predict (directly or indirectly) any level of our future performance. Our performance is dependent upon future events and is, therefore, inherently uncertain. Past performance cannot be relied upon to predict future events due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation, varying business strategies, different local and national economic circumstances, different supply and demand characteristics, varying degrees of competition and varying circumstances pertaining to the real estate capital markets.

Insurance on loans and real estate-related securities collateral may not cover all losses.

There are certain types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, terrorism or acts of war, which may be uninsurable or not economically insurable. Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors also might result in insurance proceeds insufficient to repair or replace a property if it is damaged or destroyed. Under these circumstances, the insurance proceeds received with respect to a property relating to one of our investments might not be adequate to restore our economic position with respect to our investment. Any uninsured loss could result in the corresponding nonperformance of or loss on our investment related to such property.

Our business may be adversely affected by the impact on the financial markets due to recent bank failures.

Recent bank failures in the United States and elsewhere could have far-reaching effects on the U.S. and other financial markets, including widespread failures of financial institutions, limited availability of credit, counterparty credit risks and adverse effects on issuers of debt and equity and other assets in which we invest and other instruments to which we have exposure, as well as the broader economy. Any or all of these developments may have a material adverse effect on us; for example, fluctuations in the market prices of securities and/or interest rates may adversely affect the value of our portfolio and/or increase the inherent risks associated with an investment in real estate-related assets. The ability of assets securing our investments to refinance may depend on their ability to obtain additional financing. Any deterioration of the global debt markets or the credit ratings of certain investors (including, without limitation, sovereign nations), any possible future failures of certain financial services companies or a significant rise in interest rates, taxes or market perception of counterparty default risk will likely significantly reduce investor demand for Company-level financing and similar types of liquidity for investment grade, high-yield, and senior and other types of bank debt. This, in turn, is likely to result in some potential lenders being unable or unwilling to finance new investments, to provide working capital or to provide financing for other purposes permitted under the Investment Advisory Agreement or to be willing to provide such financing only on terms less favorable than those that had been available in the recent past. As of the date of this Registration Statement, certain U.S. banks have experienced liquidity issues related to, among other factors, rising interest rates. It is currently unknown the extent to which these events will affect the availability of financing for CRE. While disruption in the capital markets could enhance our ability to originate or acquire debt investments on attractive terms, a component of our investment strategy rests on our ability to obtain financing for our investments and operations on terms accretive to our investment strategy. A lack of such financing would adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Sustainability risks may have a greater impact on us than that assessed by the Advisor.

We may be affected by the impact of a number of sustainability factors, also referred to as ESG factors, on real estate assets securing or related to loans originated by us or other investments in which we participate

102

(“sustainability risks”). The reach of sustainability themes may be broad and this subsection is therefore not an exhaustive list of all risks related to ESG factors which could have a negative impact (whether or not material) on the value of an underlying or related real estate asset and therefore adversely impact our returns.

The real estate assets securing or related to our loans and investments may be negatively affected by the exposure to physical climate events such as droughts, famines, floods, storms, fires and exposure to extreme temperatures; although a number of these risks may be insurable, it is not guaranteed that the insurance coverage may in all cases be adequate and losses connected to these events may be material. In addition, the actions taken on the real estate assets securing or related to our loans to improve such real estate asset’s environmental resilience and greenhouse gas emission footprint, including but not limited to actions aimed at improving a building’s energy use efficiency, deployment of clean energy generation and consumption equipment, actions aimed at reducing waste and water use, typically impose significant short-term costs. Similarly, social initiatives and the adherence to high governance standards, for example in the areas of transparency, corporate governance, management of conflicts of interest and fair remuneration principles, accounting and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions traced back to the construction and operation of assets secured by our loans and investments, may require material investments and effort where economic returns may be uncertain. Any decrease in value or significant costs and investments affecting the assets securing or related to loans originated by us or in which we invest may result in a borrower’s default or inability to pay amounts due on a loan, which would, in turn, adversely impact our returns.

Prospective investors should consider the adverse impacts that our investments may have on sustainability themes: the failure to support assets that advance sustainability themes and/or mitigate material physical climate and transition risks, may result in a number of negative fallouts ranging from reputational damages and, in some circumstances, fines and direct economic consequences from ESG related regulatory requirements that range from energy performance standards to mandatory disclosure.

We may also be negatively impacted (e.g., from a reputational point of view) if we do business with parties who fail to meet key ESG targets or make misleading statements with respect to ESG related objectives. In the event a counter-party of ours, or the real estate securing an investment of ours, uses manipulation or misinformation to bolster its ESG claims, we could be negatively impacted through no fault of our own.

Shareholders may differ in their views of whether or how ESG matters should be addressed and, as a result, we may invest in, or manage, our investments in a manner that does not reflect the beliefs and values of any particular investor which may be perceived negatively by at least some shareholders and adversely impact our reputation and business. Anti-ESG sentiment has gained some momentum across the United States, with several states having enacted or proposed “anti-ESG” policies or legislation, or issued related legal opinions. If we do not successfully manage ESG-related expectations across these varied shareholder interests, it could erode shareholder trust, impact our reputation, and constrain our acquisition and capital raising opportunities.

In considering investment opportunities and making ongoing decisions with respect to our investments, including decisions relating to follow-on investments, the Advisor may consider certain ESG factors. We may forego particular investments that do not meet certain ESG criteria or present material ESG risk that we may otherwise have made if we were seeking to make investments solely on the basis of financial returns. Further, it is possible that our investments are unable to obtain or realize the intended ESG outcomes.

Climate change and regulations intended to control its impact may affect the value of the real estate assets securing or related to loans we originated or in which we invest. We and the Advisor cannot predict the long-term impacts on real estate assets from climate change or related regulations. Laws enacted to mitigate climate change could increase energy costs, could make some buildings of property owners obsolete or cause such owners to make material investments in their properties to meet existing and newly created greenhouse gas emission benchmarks or energy performance standards, which could materially and adversely affect the value of older properties underlying or relating to our investments. Climate change may also have indirect effects on

103

property owners by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance. Moreover, compliance with new laws or regulations related to climate change, including compliance with “green” building codes or tenant preferences for “green” buildings, may cause property owners to incur additional costs when renovating older properties. Any decrease in value or significant costs and investments affecting the assets securing or related to loans originated by us or in which we invest may result in a borrower’s default or inability to pay amounts due on a loan, which would, in turn, adversely impact our returns. There can be no assurance that climate change will not have a material adverse effect on our assets, operations or business.

There can be no guarantee that the actual impact of the sustainability factors on our returns will not be materially greater than the impact assessed or expected by the Advisor.

Failure to identify and exclude bad actors could disqualify us from relying on certain rules on which we rely.

We are offering Common Shares in a private offering, not registered under the Securities Act, or any other securities laws, including state securities or blue sky laws. Our Common Shares are offered in reliance upon the exemption from registration thereunder provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. If certain persons and entities involved with the offering of the Common Shares, including any shareholder holding (20%) or more of a fund’s outstanding voting equity securities, are or have been subject to certain criminal convictions, SEC disciplinary orders, court injunctions or similar adverse events (collectively, “bad act determinations”), then in certain instances we may be disqualified from relying upon Rule 506. There is no assurance that efforts to exercise reasonable care to identify and exclude bad actors from participating in the offering will be deemed to be sufficient to comply with these requirements. If we were disqualified from relying upon the exemption from registration provided in Rule 506, there may not be another exemption from registration available under the Securities Act and, consequently, we may not have an exemption from registration under any state securities or blue sky laws. If these exemptions from registration were unavailable, then we may be subject to, and incur significant costs related to, enforcement actions and rescission rights may be available to the shareholders, which if exercised, may require us to liquidate assets earlier and on less advantageous terms than were anticipated at underwriting and/or may cause us to have a more limited amount of capital available for investment, impairing our ability to assemble, manage, retain and harvest a complete and balanced portfolio.

If we cease to be eligible for an exemption from regulation as a commodity pool operator, our compliance expenses could increase substantially.

Our Advisor intends to file with the National Futures Association a notice of exclusion from registration with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator (“CPO”) pursuant to CFTC Rule 4.5. CFTC Rule 4.5 relieves our Advisor from registering with the CFTC as the CPO of us, so long as we:

• continue to be regulated by the SEC as a BDC;

• confine our trading in CFTC-regulated derivatives within specified thresholds; and

• are not marketed to the public as a commodity pool or as a vehicle for trading in CFTC-regulated derivatives.

If we were unable to satisfy the conditions of CFTC Rule 4.5 in the future, our Advisor may be subject to registration with the CFTC as a CPO, unless it can rely on a different exclusion, exemption or no-action relief. Registered CPOs must comply with numerous substantive regulations related to disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping, and are required to become members of the NFA, and be subject to the NFA’s rules and bylaws. Compliance with these additional registration and regulatory requirements could increase our expenses and impact performance.

104

Political changes may affect the real estate-related securities markets.

The current regulatory environment in the United States may be impacted by future legislative developments.

The outcome of elections creates uncertainty with respect to legal, tax and regulatory regimes in which we and our investments, as well as the Advisor and its affiliates, will operate. Any significant changes in, among other things, economic policy (including with respect to interest rates and foreign trade), the regulation of the investment management industry, tax law, immigration policy or government entitlement programs could have a material adverse impact on us and our investments.

Litigation outcomes may have an adverse impact on us.

The Company’s investment activities subject it to the normal risks of becoming involved in litigation by third parties. This risk is somewhat greater where the Company exercises control or significant influence over a company’s direction. The Company may also be subject to certain litigation and related risks associated with origination and servicing. Loan origination and servicing companies are routinely involved in legal proceedings concerning matters that arise in the ordinary course of their business. These legal proceedings range from actions involving a single plaintiff to class action lawsuits with potentially tens of thousands of class members. In addition, a number of participants in the loan origination and servicing industry (including control persons of industry participants) have been the subject of regulatory actions by state regulators, including state attorneys general, and by the federal government. Governmental investigations, examinations or regulatory actions, or private lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits, may adversely affect such companies’ financial results. To the extent the Company seeks to engage in origination and/or servicing directly, or has a financial interest in, or is otherwise affiliated with, an origination or servicing company, the Company will be subject to enhanced risks of litigation, regulatory actions and other proceedings. The expense of defending against claims by third parties and paying any amounts pursuant to settlements or judgments would generally be borne by the Company and would reduce net assets.

Public health crises have, and may in the future, adversely impact our business and the business of many of our borrowers.

Public health crises could have repercussions across domestic and global economies and financial markets. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in many governmental authorities imposing significant restrictions on businesses and individuals that triggered economic consequences, including high unemployment, later, then high inflation, that resulted in challenging operating conditions for many businesses, particularly in the retail (including restaurants), office and hospitality sectors. These actions directly and indirectly adversely effected the financing markets as well and resulted in margin calls from our lenders, which we satisfied.

The extent to which pandemics and similar health crises impact our or our borrowers’ operations will depend on future developments which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the events, treatment developments and government responses to the events. The inability of our borrowers to meet their loan obligations and/or borrowers filing for bankruptcy protection as a result of these events would reduce our cash flows, which would impact our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

The foregoing risks do not purport to be a complete explanation of all the risks involved in acquiring our Common Shares. Prospective investors are urged to read this entire Registration Statement and the governing documents of the Company before making a determination whether to invest in the Company.

105

ITEM 2. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Discussion of Management’s Expected Operating Plans

The information in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Registration Statement.

Overview

We are a newly formed, externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that intends to elect to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act and intends to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and to qualify annually thereafter, as a REIT. We were formed as a Delaware statutory trust on March 11, 2024. As a BDC, we must comply with certain regulatory requirements. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation as a Business Development Company” and “Item 1. Business—Certain U.S. Tax Considerations.”

We will be externally managed by the Advisor. Our Advisor is a limited liability company that is registered as an investment advisor under the Advisers Act. Our Advisor oversees the management of our activities and is responsible for making investment decisions with respect to our portfolio.

The Company’s investment objectives are to seek to provide high current income while maintaining downside protection.

The Company will seek to invest in assets that will enable it to:

• provide current income in the form of regular, stable cash distributions to achieve an attractive distribution yield;

• preserve and protect invested capital, by primarily focusing on high-quality credit investments supported by current cash-flow and/or limited business plan risk in the underlying assets;

• reduce downside risk through loans with relatively low loan-to-value ratios, meaning we generally invest in less risky loans with low interest rates which are backed by high-quality real assets, with a focus on residential lending and with meaningful borrower equity; and

• provide an investment alternative for shareholders seeking to allocate a portion of their long-term investment portfolios to CRE debt with expected lower volatility than publicly traded securities and compelling risk-adjusted returns compared to fixed income alternatives.

We intend to use our proceeds from the offering to finance our investment objectives. The Company’s investment strategy is to originate, acquire, finance and manage a portfolio of primarily CRE investments, focused on senior secured, CRE loans across a wide range of geography. The Company will focus its investments in the middle market, with loans in the range of $25 - $100 million, across a mix of asset classes, but maintain a focus on residential lending. It is expected that most of the borrowers will be eligible portfolio companies, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act. To a lesser extent, the Company may invest in, or originate, other real-estate related debt and equity investments, which may include subordinated debt, CMBS and CLOs. The Company believes its real estate-related debt and equity investments will help manage cash before investing subscription proceeds into investments while also seeking attractive current income.

The Company will seek to focus on a flexible mix of credit and other real estate investments associated with high-quality assets to generate current cash flow. The Company seeks to identify attractive risk-reward

106

investment opportunities with a focus on financing middle market investments. The Company expects to create synergies with Benefit Street Partner’s commercial real estate team’s existing debt sourcing capabilities by leveraging its significant scale and existing relationships to source high quality lending opportunities.

We expect to conduct private placements of our Common Shares to investors in reliance on exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. At the closing of any private placement, each investor will make a Capital Commitment to purchase Common Shares pursuant to a subscription agreement entered into with us. Investors will be required to fund drawdowns to purchase shares of Common Shares up to the amount of their respective Capital Commitments on an as-needed basis each time we deliver a notice to the investors. See “Item 1. Business—Private Placement.”

Investments

The Company’s investment strategy is to originate, acquire, finance and manage a portfolio of primarily CRE debt investments, focused on senior secured, CRE loans diversified across geography. The Company will focus its investments in the middle market across a diversified mix of asset classes, but maintain a focus on residential lending. It is expected that most of the borrowers will be eligible portfolio companies, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act. To a lesser extent, the Company may invest in, or originate, other real-estate related debt and equity investments, which may include subordinated debt, CMBS and CLOs. The Company believes its real estate-related debt and equity investments will help manage cash before investing subscription proceeds into investments while also seeking attractive current income.

The Company will seek to focus on a flexible mix of real estate investments, secured by high-quality assets to generate current cash flow. The Company seeks to identify attractive risk-reward investment opportunities by financing middle market investment companies. The Company expects to create synergies with Benefit Street Partner’s commercial real estate team’s existing debt sourcing capabilities by leveraging its significant scale and existing relationships to source high quality lending opportunities.

Before the Company has raised substantial proceeds in the offering and acquired a diversified portfolio of investments or during periods in which the Advisor determines that economic or market conditions are unfavorable to shareholders and a defensive strategy would benefit the Company, the Company may temporarily depart from its investment strategy. During these periods, subject to compliance with the 1940 Act, the Company may expand or change its investment strategy and target assets, including by investing all or any portion of its assets in U.S. government securities, including bills, notes and bonds differing as to maturity and rates of interest that are either issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury or by U.S. government agencies or instrumentalities; non-U.S. government securities that have received the highest investment grade credit rating; certificates of deposit issued against funds deposited in a bank or a savings and loan association; commercial paper; bankers’ acceptances; fixed time deposits; shares of money market funds; credit-linked notes; repurchase agreements with respect to any of the foregoing; or any other fixed income securities that the Advisor considers consistent with this temporary strategy.

Senior secured loans generally are senior debt instruments that rank ahead of subordinated debt and equity in priority of payments and are generally secured by liens on the operating assets of a borrower which may include inventory, receivables, plant, property and equipment. Mezzanine debt is subordinated to senior loans and is generally unsecured.

Expenses

We will bear all out-of-pocket costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including, but not limited to:

• all investment personnel of the Advisor, when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory services hereunder, and the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, shall be provided and paid for by the Advisor and not by the Company;

107

• organization expenses and offering expenses, including third-party due diligence fees related to an offering;

• costs and expenses incurred in contracting with third parties on behalf of the Company;

• the actual cost of goods and services used by the Company and obtained from non-affiliated persons;

• administrative services expenses, including all costs and expenses incurred by the Advisor or its Affiliates in fulfilling its duties hereunder, including reasonable salaries and wages, benefits and overhead of all employees directly involved in the performance of such services; provided, however, that no reimbursement shall be made for costs of such employees of the Advisor or its affiliates to the extent that such employees perform services related to the acquisition of investments;

• expenses of organizing, amending, revising, converting, modifying or terminating the Company or the Declaration of Trust or the bylaws, or any of its subsidiaries;

• expenses incurred by the Advisor and payable to third parties, including agents, consultants and other advisors, in monitoring the financial and legal affairs of the Company, news and quotation subscriptions, and market or industry research expenses;

• the cost of calculating the Company’s NAV;

• the cost of effecting sales of the Company’s Common Shares and other securities;

• the Management Fees and Incentive Fees payable pursuant to the Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement;

• expenses of managing and operating investments owned by the Company, whether payable to an Affiliate of the Company or a non-affiliated person;

• fees payable to third parties, including agents, consultants and other advisors, relating to, or associated with, making investments, and, if necessary, enforcing its rights, and valuing investments (including third-party valuation firms);

• expenses related to consummated or unconsummated investments, including dead deal or broken deal expenses;

• rating agency expenses;

• interest and other costs for financings, including discounts, points and other similar fees, taxes and assessment on income of the Company or its investments, and accounting fees, legal fees, closing and other similar costs;

• distributions on the Company’s shares;

• administration fees payable under the Administration Agreement;

• the allocated costs incurred by the Administrator in providing managerial assistance to those portfolio companies that request it;

• transfer agent and custodial fees;

• fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts (including attendance at investment conferences and similar events);

• accounting, audit and tax preparation expenses;

• federal and state registration fees;

• any exchange listing fees;

• federal, state, local, and other taxes;

• costs and expenses incurred in relation to compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the operation and administration of the Company generally;

108

• Independent Trustees’ fees and expenses, including any legal counsel or other advisors retained by, or at the discretion or for the benefit of, the Independent Trustees;

• brokerage commissions;

• costs of preparing government filings, including periodic and current reports with the SEC;

• the Company’s fidelity bond, trustees and officers/errors and omissions liability insurance, and any other insurance premiums;

• indemnification payments;

• expenses relating to the development and maintenance of the Company’s website, if any, and other operations and technology costs;

• direct costs and expenses of administration, including printing, mailing, copying, telephone, fees of independent accountants and outside legal costs; and

• all other expenses incurred by the Company or the Administrator in connection with administering the Company’s business, including, but not limited to, payments under the Administration Agreement based upon the Company’s allocable portion of the Administrator’s overhead in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent, travel and the allocable portion of the cost of the Company’s chief compliance officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs, including operations and tax professionals, and administrative staff providing support services in respect of the Company.

For avoidance of doubt, it is agreed and understood that, from time to time, the Advisor or its affiliates may pay amounts or bear costs properly constituting Company expenses as set forth herein or otherwise and that the Company shall reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates for all such costs and expenses that have been paid by the Advisor or its affiliates on behalf of the Company.

In certain circumstances the Advisor, any sub-advisor, or any of their respective affiliates, may receive compensation from a portfolio company, in connection with the Company’s investment in such portfolio company. Any compensation received by the Advisor, sub-advisor, or any of their respective affiliates, attributable to the Company’s investment in any portfolio company, in excess of any of the limitations in or exemptions granted from the 1940 Act, any interpretation thereof by the staff of the SEC, or the conditions set forth in any exemptive relief granted to the Advisor, any sub-adviser or the Company by the SEC, shall be delivered promptly to the Company and the Company will retain such excess compensation for the benefit of its shareholders.

All of the expenses described above may be ultimately borne by the Company’s Shareholders.

The Company bears, among other expenses and costs, the cost of its organization as well as initial and ongoing offering expenses subject to the Expense Cap. The Company’s initial private offering costs will be recorded as a reduction to paid-in-capital when the offering is completed.

Expense Limitation Agreement

The Advisor and the Company entered into the Expense Limitation Agreement. Under the Expense Limitation Agreement, the Advisor has agreed on a quarterly basis to reimburse the Company’s Specified Expenses to the extent such annualized Specified Expenses exceed the Expense Cap, and any of such reimbursement is not subject to recapture.

“Specified Expenses” include the Company’s initial organization and offering costs, as well as the Company’s annualized operating expenses, inclusive of any fees the Company has agreed to bear pursuant to

109

4(b) of the Administration Agreement, but excluding (i) expenses directly related to the interest costs and structuring costs for borrowing and line(s) of credit, (ii) any taxes, litigation and extraordinary expenses related to any structuring, litigation or other actions taken by the Advisor to preserve or enhance the value of the Investments for the Shareholders and (iii) the Incentive Fees.

The Expense Limitation Agreement shall be in effect during the Term of the Company, unless and until the Board approves its modification or termination.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

We intend to generate cash primarily from the net proceeds of any offering of our Common Shares and from cash flows from interest and fees earned from our investments and principal repayments and proceeds from sales of our investments. We may also fund a portion of our investments through borrowings from banks and issuances of senior securities, including before we have fully invested the proceeds of the private placement. Our primary use of cash will be investments in first and second lien senior secured loans, and to a lesser extent, mezzanine loans, unsecured loans and equity of predominantly private U.S. middle market companies, payments of our expenses and payment of cash distributions to our shareholders.

Hedging

The Company may, but is not required to, enter into interest rate, or other derivative agreements to hedge interest rate, credit or other risks, but the Company does not generally intend to enter into any such derivative agreements for speculative purposes. Any derivative agreements entered into for speculative purposes are not expected to be material to the Company’s business or results of operations. These hedging activities, which will be in compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, may include the use of futures, options and forward contracts. The Company will bear the costs incurred in connection with entering into, administering and settling any such derivative contracts. There can be no assurance that any hedging strategy employed by the Company will be successful.

The Company intends to qualify as a “limited derivatives user” under Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, which generally will require the Company to limit its derivatives exposure to 10% of its net assets at any time, excluding certain currency and interest rate hedging transactions.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we will evaluate our estimates, including those related to the matters described below. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Valuation of Portfolio Investments

The Board of Trustees is responsible for overseeing the valuation of our portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to the Advisor’s valuation policy. As permitted by Rule 2a-5 of the 1940 Act, the Board of Trustees has designated the Advisor as our valuation designee with day-to-day responsibility for implementing the portfolio valuation process set forth in the Advisor’s valuation policy.

110

Portfolio investments are reported on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities at fair value. At least quarterly, or more frequently as needed for a Drawdown Date, we perform an analysis of each investment to determine fair value as follows:

Securities for which market quotations are readily available on an exchange are valued at the reported closing price on the valuation date. We may also obtain quotes with respect to certain of our investments from pricing services or brokers or dealers in order to value assets. When doing so, we determine whether the quote obtained is readily available according to GAAP to determine the fair value of the security. If determined readily available, we use the quote obtained.

Investments without a readily determined market value are primarily valued using a market approach, an income approach, or both approaches, as appropriate. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a single present amount (discounted). The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts. In following these approaches, the types of factors that we may take into account in fair value pricing our investments include, as relevant: available current market data, including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction comparables, applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection provisions, information rights, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public, M&A comparables, and enterprise values, among other factors. When available, broker quotations and/or quotations provided by pricing services are considered as an input in the valuation process.

For an investment in an investment fund that does not have a readily determinable fair value, we measure the fair value of the investment predominately based on the net asset value per share of the investment fund if the net asset value of the investment fund is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of ASC 946, as of our measurement date.

As part of our quarterly valuation process the Advisor may be assisted by one or more independent valuation firms engaged by us. The Advisor as valuation designee determines the fair value of each investment, in good faith, based on the input of the independent valuation firm(s) (to the extent applicable).

With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available, the Advisor undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

• Each portfolio company or investment will be valued by the Advisor, potentially with assistance from one or more independent valuation firms engaged by our Board of Trustees;

• The independent valuation firm(s) conduct independent appraisals and make an independent assessment of the value of each investment; and

• The Advisor determines the fair value of each investment, in good faith, based on the input of the Advisor and independent valuation firm (to the extent applicable) and the audit committee of the Board of Trustees.

In circumstances where the Advisor deems appropriate, the Advisor’s internal valuation team values certain investments. When performing the internal valuations, the Advisor utilizes similar valuation techniques as an independent third-party pricing service would use. Such valuations will be approved by an internal valuation committee of the Advisor, with oversight from the Board of Trustees.

Because there is not a readily available market value for most of the investments in its portfolio, we value substantially all of our portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith by our Advisor, as

111

described herein. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that we may ultimately realize. Further, such investments are generally subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded securities. If we were required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded it.

Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation

Gains or losses on the sale of investments are calculated using the specific identification method. We measure realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation will reflect the change in portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation, when gains or losses are realized.

Revenue Recognition

Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis. Discount and premium on investments purchased are accreted/amortized over the expected life of the respective investment using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments.

Other Income

Fee income, such as structuring fees, origination, closing, amendment fees, commitment and other upfront fees are generally non-recurring and are recognized as revenue when earned, either upfront or amortized into income. Upon the payment of a loan or debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan origination, structuring, closing, commitment and other upfront fees are recorded as income.

Organization and Offering Expenses

We will bear the organization and offering expenses incurred in connection with the formation of the Company and the private offering of our Common Shares within the Expense Cap, including the out-of-pocket expenses of the Advisor and its agents and affiliates. Organization costs are expensed as incurred. Offering costs are capitalized as a deferred charge and will be recorded as a reduction to paid-in-capital when the offering is completed.

U.S. Federal Income Taxes

The Company intends to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a REIT under Subchapter M of the Code, and to qualify annually thereafter as a REIT. See “Item 1. Business–Certain U.S. Tax Considerations.”

Contractual Obligations

As of June 13, 2024, we had not commenced operations and did not have any significant contractual payment obligations.

112

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or interest rates. We expect our market risk will arise primarily from interest rate risk relating to interest rate fluctuations. Many factors including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors that are beyond our control contribute to interest rate risk. To meet our short and long-term liquidity requirements, we may borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes in earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, collars and treasury lock agreements, subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments with fixed interest rates. During the periods covered by this report, we did not engage in interest rate hedging activities. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

113

ITEM 3. PROPERTIES.

Our headquarters are located at 1345 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 32A, New York, NY 10105 and are provided by our Administrator. We believe that our office facilities are suitable and adequate for our business as it is contemplated to be conducted.

114

ITEM 4. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

We have not yet commenced commercial activities and will not do so until we issue an initial Drawdown Notice.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the expected beneficial ownership of our Common Shares as of June 13, 2024, by:

• each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our Common Shares;

• each of our Trustees and executive officers; and

• all of our Trustees and executive officers as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. There are no Common Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date of this Registration Statement.

	Shares Beneficially Owned
Name and address(1)	Number		Percentage
Interested Trustee
Richard J. Byrne		—		—
Independent Trustees
Leslie D. Michelson		—		—
Lee Hillman		—		—
Executive Officers who are not Trustees
Michael Comparato		—		—
Jerome Baglien		—		—
Micah Goodman		—		—
George Talarico		—		—
Other
BSP Fund Holdco (Debt Strategy) L.P.		60		100	%
All officers and Trustees as a group (7 persons)		—		—

* Represents less than 1%.

(1) The address for each Trustee and executive officer is c/o Benefit Street Partners L.L.C., 1345 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 32A, New York, NY 10105.

As of June 13, 2024:

Title of Class	Number of Record Holders
Common Shares, par value $0.001		1

115

ITEM 5. TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Trustees. The responsibilities of the Board of Trustees include, among other things, the oversight of our investment activities, the monthly and non-monthly valuation of our assets, oversight of our financing arrangements and corporate governance activities. Our Board of Trustees elects the Company’s executive officers, who serve at the discretion of the Board of Trustees.

The Board of Trustees currently has an audit committee and a nominating committee, and may establish additional committees from time to time as necessary. Each trustee will serve until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies. Although the number of trustees may be increased or decreased, a decrease will not have the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent trustee. Any trustee may resign at any time and may be removed with or without cause by the shareholders upon the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of trustees. The notice of the meeting will indicate that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to determine if the trustee will be removed.

Board of Trustees and Executive Officers

Trustees

A majority of our Board of Trustees are not “interested persons” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. We refer to these individuals as our “Independent Trustees.” With respect to Interested Trustees that are employed by the Advisor or one of its affiliates, such Trustees shall automatically be deemed removed as a Trustee of the Company simultaneously with the cessation of such Trustee’s employment with the Advisor or its affiliate (for any reason, including termination with or without cause). Our Board of Trustees currently consists of three trustees as set forth below:

Name	Age		Position(s) held with the Company
Interested Trustee:
Richard J. Byrne		63	Chair of the Board of Trustees; Chief Executive Officer
Independent Trustees:
Leslie D. Michelson		73	Trustee
Lee Hillman		68	Trustee

The address for each of our trustees is c/o Benefit Street Partners L.L.C., 1345 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 32A, New York, NY 10105.

Executive Officers Who Are Not Trustees

Name	Age	Position
Michael Comparato	47	President
Jerome Baglien	47	Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
Micah Goodman	54	Secretary
George Talarico	67	Chief Compliance Officer

Each officer holds office at the pleasure of the Board of Trustees until the next election of officers or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies.

Biographical Information

Our trustees have been divided into two groups — interested trustees and Independent Trustees. An interested trustee is an “interested person” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. An Independent Trustee is a trustee who is not an “interested person.”

116

Interested Trustees

Richard J. Byrne has served as Chair of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since March 2024. Mr. Byrne is President of Benefit Street Partners. As chairman of the Board of Trustees, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, Mr. Byrne holds substantial decision-making power for the Company. Mr. Byrne is also chairman and chief executive officer of -Franklin BSP Capital Corp (“FBCC”), Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc (NYSE: FBRT), and Benefit Street Partners Multifamily Trust. Prior to joining BSP in 2013, Mr. Byrne was chief executive officer of Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. He was also the global head of capital markets at Deutsche Bank as well as a member of their global banking executive committee and global markets executive committee. Before joining Deutsche Bank, Mr. Byrne was global co-head of the leveraged finance group and global head of credit research at Merrill Lynch. He was also a perennially top-ranked credit analyst. Mr. Byrne earned a Masters of Business Administration from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and a Bachelor of Arts from Binghamton University. Mr. Byrne is a member of the board of directors of Wynn Resorts, Limited (NASDAQ: WYNN), and New York Road Runners. He is also the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of KASAI Elite Grappling Championships.

We believe that Mr. Byrne’s experience as a director or executive officer of the companies described above make him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Trustees.

Independent Trustees

Leslie D. Michelson has served as an intendent trustee of the Company since March 2024. Mr. Michelson has served as a director of Franklin BSP Capital Corporation (“FBCC”) since March 2020. Until January 2024, when FBCC acquired Franklin BSP Lending Corporation (“FBLC”), Mr. Michelson served as an independent director of FBLC. FBLC was previously advised an affiliate of AR Global Investments, LLC, since January 2011. In November 2016, FBLC’s external advisor was acquired by Benefit Street Partners. Mr Michelson has served as an independent director of Global Net Lease (“GNL”) since September 2023, as a result of the acquisition by GNL of The Necessity Retail REIT (“RTL”) upon which merger Mr. Michelson and all other members of the RTL board became directors of GNL. In addition, Mr. Michelson has served as an independent director of Healthcare Trust, Inc. since December 2015, including as non-executive chair since October 2016. Mr. Michelson has served as an independent director of American Finance Trust, Inc. since February 2017. Mr. Michelson previously served as an independent director of American Realty Capital — Retail Centers of America, Inc. (“RCA”) from November 2015 until the close of RCA’s merger with AFIN in February 2017, and previously served as an independent director of RCA from March 2012 until October 2012. Mr. Michelson previously served as an independent director of Business Development Corporation of America II from August 2014 until its liquidation and dissolution in September 2016 and as an independent trustee of Realty Capital Income Funds Trust, a family of mutual funds advised by an affiliate of AR Global, from April 2013 until its dissolution in January 2017. Mr. Michelson previously served as an independent director of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. (“HT”) from January 2011 until July 2012 and as lead independent director of HT from July 2012 until January 2015 when HT closed its merger with Ventas, Inc. Mr. Michelson served as an independent director of American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. from January 2008, including as lead independent director from July 2012, until the close of its merger with Realty Income Corporation in January 2013. Mr. Michelson also served as an independent director of VEREIT, Inc. (“VEREIT”) from October 2012 until April 2015. Mr. Michelson also served as an independent director of BDCA Venture, Inc. from June 2014 until June 2015. Mr. Michelson served as lead independent director of Benefit Street Partners Realty Trust, Inc. (formerly known as Realty Finance Trust, Inc.) from January 2013 until November 2014. Mr. Michelson served as an independent director of American Realty Capital Daily Net Asset Value Trust, Inc. from August 2011 until February 2012 and as an independent director of New York REIT, Inc. from October 2009 until August 2011. He has served as an independent director of American Realty Capital — Retail Centers of America, Inc. (“RCA”) since November 2015, and previously served as an independent director of RCA from March 2012 until October 2012. Mr. Michelson received his B.A. from The Johns Hopkins University in 1973 and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1976.

117

We believe that Mr. Michelson’s experience as a director or executive officer of the companies described above make him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Trustees.

Lee Hillman has served as an intendent trustee of the Company since March 2024. Mr. Hillman has served as an independent director of Franklin BSP Capital Corporation and chairman of the audit committee since March 2020. Until January 2024, Mr. Hillman also served as a member of the board of directors of FBLC where he served as chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Hillman has served as President of Liberation Advisory Group, a private management consulting firm, since 2003. Mr. Hillman has also served as Chief Executive Officer of Performance Health Systems, LLC, an early-stage business distributing Power Plate^® and bioDensity^® branded, specialty health and exercise equipment since 2012, and its predecessor since 2009. From February 2006 to May 2008, Mr. Hillman served as Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Power Plate International (“Power Plate”) and from 2004 through 2006 as CEO of Power Plate North America. Previously, from 1996 through 2002, Mr. Hillman was CEO of Bally Total Fitness Corporation, then the world’s largest fitness membership club business. Mr. Hillman also serves as a member of the board of directors and chair of the Audit Committee of Broadtree Residential, Inc. Mr. Hillman currently serves as a member of the board of Directors of Lawson Products, Inc. where he serves as the lead independent director and chair of its Audit Committee and its Compensation Committee. He also serves as a board member and chair of the Audit Committee of Trinity Acquisition Corporation. Previously he has served as a member of the Board of Directors of HealthSouth Corporation, Wyndham International, RCN Corporation (where he was Chairman of the Board), Bally Total Fitness Corporation (where he was Chairman of the Board), HC2 Holdings, Inc. and Professional Diversity Network. He was also a trustee of the Adelphia Recovery Trust. Mr. Hillman holds a B.S. in Finance and Accounting from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. in Finance and Accounting from the Booth School of Business of the University of Chicago. Mr. Hillman is a Certified Public Accountant and former audit partner with Ernst & Young LLP.

We believe that Mr. Hillman’s experience as a director or executive officer of the companies described above make him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Trustees.

Executive Officers Who Are Not Trustees

Michael Comparato has served as President of FBRT since March 2024 and will serve as President of the Company. Mr. Comparato is a Senior Managing Director, Head of Real Estate and Senior Portfolio Manager, a member of the BSP Executive Committee and a member of the commercial real estate Investment Committee. Prior to joining BSP in 2015, Mr. Comparato was head of U.S. Equity Investments at Ladder Capital, where he led Ladder’s largest team that actively originated CMBS loans, structured/balance sheet loans, mezzanine loans and acquired strategic assets for the firm. Prior to joining Ladder, Mr. Comparato was president of BankAtlantic Commercial Mortgage Capital (BACMC), the CMBS affiliate of BankAtlantic, where he was responsible for managing all day-to-day operations. Mr. Comparato also previously ran Compson Holding Corporation, which made equity investments in a variety of commercial real estate assets and publicly traded REITs. Mr. Comparato received a Bachelor of Science, Summa Cum Laude, from Babson College.

Jerome Baglien has served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer since March 2024. Mr. Baglien is a Managing Director of BSP, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of BSP’s commercial real estate business and a member of the BSP Operating Committee. Mr. Baglien is also a member of the commercial real estate Investment Committee. Prior to joining BSP in 2016, Mr. Baglien was director of fund finance for GTIS Partners LP, where he oversaw all finance and operations for GTIS funds. Previously, he was an accounting manager at iStar Inc. with oversight of loans and special investments. Mr. Baglien received a Master of Business Administration from Kellstadt Graduate School of Business at DePaul University and a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from the University of Oregon.

Micah Goodman has served as Secretary since March 2024. Mr. Goodman is a Managing Director and General Counsel of BSP’s commercial real estate business. He is also general counsel and corporate secretary of

118

FBRT. Prior to joining BSP in 2014, Mr. Goodman was an executive director in the transaction management group at Ladder Capital Finance, where his team was responsible for structuring, negotiating and closing commercial real estate loans. Prior to joining Ladder Capital, Mr. Goodman was a vice president at Credit Suisse and at JP Morgan Chase in their real estate capital markets groups. Previously, Mr. Goodman was a real estate and finance attorney at law firms including Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP and Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner LLP. Mr. Goodman received a Juris Doctor from Cornell Law School and a Bachelor of Arts from Swarthmore College.

George Talarico has served as Chief Compliance Officer since March 2024. Mr. Talarico has served as Chief Compliance Officer of Franklin BSP Capital Corporation since January 2024. Mr. Talarico is a Director at ACA Global and serves as a Chief Compliance Officer for registered investment advisers (RIAs) and registered investment companies (RICs) including business development companies (BDCs). ACA Global has served as CCO of the Company since inception. Mr. Talarico has also consulted with RIAs, BDCs, Interval Funds, and private funds, and has performed mock exams, compliance testing, and annual reviews. Previously, Mr. Talarico served as General Counsel and Managing Director at Alaric Compliance Services. He is a licensed attorney (admitted to practice law in NY and NJ) and was a partner, office managing partner, co-chair of the products liability practice group, member of the Board of Directors, and office ethics officer at the AmLaw 100 law firms of Thacher Proffitt & Wood and Locke Lord (F/K/A Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge). He earned a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University, an M.S. in Civil Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology, and a J.D. from Fordham University School of Law.

Leadership Structure of the Board of Trustees

The Board of Trustees monitors and performs an oversight role with respect to the business and affairs of the Company, including with respect to investment practices and performance, compliance with regulatory requirements and the services, expenses and performance of service providers to the Company. Among other things, the Board of Trustees approves the appointment of the investment adviser, administrator and officers, reviews and monitors the services and activities performed by the investment adviser, administrator and officers and approves the engagement, and reviews the performance of, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Under our bylaws, the Board of Trustees may designate any officer of trustee to act as chair of any meeting of the Board of Trustees or any shareholder meeting in the absence of the chairman of the Board of Trustees. The Company does not have a fixed policy as to whether the chairman of the Board of Trustees should be an Independent Trustee and believes that its flexibility to select its chairman and reorganize its leadership structure from time to time is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

Richard J. Byrne will serve as our chairman of the Board of Trustees and as our Chief Executive Officer. Our Board of Trustees believes that our chief executive officer is best situated to serve as chairman because he is the trustee most familiar with our business and industry and most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities and leading the discussion and execution of the Company’s strategy. We believe the combined role of chairman and chief executive officer, together with our Independent Trustees, is in our best interest because it provides the appropriate balance between strategic development and independent oversight of management.

The Company believes that board leadership structures must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The Company intends to continually re-examines its corporate governance policies on an ongoing basis to ensure that they continue to meet the Company’s needs.

• Nominating Committee: Our Nominating Committee manages risks associated with the independence of our Board of Trustees and potential conflicts of interest.

While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the committees each report to our Board of Trustees on a regular basis to apprise our Board of Trustees regarding the status of remediation efforts of known risks and of any new risks that may have arisen since the previous report.

119

The Board of Trustees also performs its risk oversight function and fulfils its risk oversight responsibilities by working with the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer to monitor risk in accordance with the Company’s policies and procedures. The Chief Compliance Officer prepares a written report annually discussing the adequacy and effectiveness of the compliance policies and procedures of the Company and certain of its service providers. The Chief Compliance Officer’s report, which is reviewed by and discussed with the Board of Trustees, addresses at a minimum (a) the operation of the compliance policies and procedures of the Company and certain of its service providers since the last report; (b) any material changes to such policies and procedures since the last report; (c) any recommendations for material changes to such policies and procedures as a result of the Chief Compliance Officer’s annual review; and (d) any compliance matter that has occurred since the date of the last report about which the Board of Trustees would reasonably need to know to oversee the Company’s compliance activities and risks. In addition, the Chief Compliance Officer reports to the Board of Trustees on a quarterly basis with respect to material compliance matters and meets separately in executive session with the Independent Trustees periodically, but in no event less than once each year.

The Company believes that the Board of Trustees role in risk oversight is effective and appropriate given the extensive regulation to which it is already subject as a BDC. Specifically, as a BDC the Company must comply with certain regulatory requirements and restrictions that control the levels of risk in its business and operations. For example, the Company’s ability to incur indebtedness is limited such that its asset coverage must equal at least 150% immediately after each time it incurs indebtedness, the Company generally has to invest at least 70% of its total assets in “qualifying assets” and, subject to certain exceptions, the Company is subject to restrictions on its ability to engage in transactions with BSP and its affiliates. In addition, the Company has elected to be treated as a REIT under the Code. As a REIT, the Company must, among other things, meet certain source of income and asset diversification requirements.

The Company believes that the extent of the Board of Trustees (and its committees’) role in risk oversight complements the Board of Trustees’ leadership structure because it allows the Independent Trustees, through the two fully independent Board of Trustees committees, executive sessions with each of the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and independent valuation providers, and otherwise, to exercise oversight of risk without any conflict that might discourage critical review.

The Company believes that a Board of Trustees’ roles in risk oversight must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and that the Board of Trustees existing role in risk oversight is appropriate. However, the Board of Trustees re-examines the manner in which it administers its risk oversight function on an ongoing basis to ensure that it continues to meet the Company’s needs.

Audit Committee

Each member of the Audit Committee is independent for purposes of the 1940 Act. Our Audit Committee consists of Lee Hillman (Chairman) and Leslie Michelson. The Board of Trustees has determined that Lee Hillman is qualified as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K and the rules and regulations of the SEC and are Independent Trustees.

The Audit Committee, in performing its duties, monitors:

• our financial reporting process, including the valuation of investments;

• the integrity of our financial statements;

• compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

• the review of the independence and qualifications of our independent auditors; and

• the review of the performance of our independent and internal auditors, as applicable.

120

Our Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter. The charter of the Audit Committee is available to any shareholder who requests it c/o Franklin BSP Real Estate Debt BDC, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 32A, New York, NY 10105.

Nominating Committee

Each member of the Nominating Committee is independent for purposes of the 1940 Act. The Nominating Committee is responsible for selecting, researching and nominating trustees for election by our shareholders, selecting nominees to fill vacancies on the Board of Trustees or a committee of the Board of Trustees, developing and recommending to the Board of Trustees a set of corporate governance principles and overseeing the evaluation of the Board of Trustees and our management. Leslie Michelson (Chairman) and Lee Hillman serve as the members of our Nominating Committee. The charter of the Nominating Committee is available in print to any shareholder who requests it.

When nominating trustee candidates, the Nominating Committee takes into consideration such factors as it deems appropriate. These factors may include judgment, skill, diversity, experience with investment companies and other organizations of comparable purpose, complexity, size and subject to similar legal restrictions and oversight, the interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other members of the Board of Trustees, each candidate’s ability to devote sufficient time to the affairs of the Company, and the extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to the Board of Trustees and any committees thereof. In addition, while the Board of Trustees does not have a formal policy on diversity, it will consider issues of diversity, including diversity of gender, race and national origin, education, professional experience and differences in viewpoints and skills when filling vacancies on the Board of Trustees. Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for trustee nominees.

The Board of Trustees will consider candidates nominated by shareholders provided that the shareholder submitting a nomination has complied with procedures set forth in the Company’s bylaws.

Investment Committee

Our Advisor’s investment committee consists of Michael Comparato, Jerome Baglien, Matthew Jacobs, and Tanya Mollova.

Our Advisor is responsible for the overall management of our activities and is responsible for making investment decisions with respect to our portfolio. All new investments require the approval by a consensus of the investment committee of our Advisor. The members of the investment committee receive no direct compensation from the Company. Such members may be employees or partners of our Advisor or its affiliates and may receive compensation or profit distributions from our Advisor or its affiliates. Information regarding the business experience of Michael Comparato, Jerome Baglien, Matthew Jacobs, and Tanya Mollova is set forth below.

Michael Comparato is a Senior Managing Director, Head of Real Estate and Senior Portfolio Manager and a member of the commercial real estate Investment Committee. Mr. Comparato is also the President of FBRT and the Company. Prior to joining BSP in 2015, Mr. Comparato was head of U.S. Equity Investments at Ladder Capital, where he led Ladder’s largest team that actively originated CMBS loans, structured/balance sheet loans, mezzanine loans and acquired strategic assets for the firm. Prior to joining Ladder, Mr. Comparato was president of BankAtlantic Commercial Mortgage Capital (BACMC), the CMBS affiliate of BankAtlantic, where he was responsible for managing all day-to-day operations. Mr. Comparato also previously ran Compson Holding Corporation, which made various equity investments in multiple different commercial real estate assets and publicly traded REITs. Mr. Comparato received a Bachelor of Science, Summa Cum Laude, from Babson College.

121

Jerome Baglien is a Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer of Real Estate. Mr. Baglien is also a member of the commercial real estate Investment Committee. Prior to joining BSP in 2016, Mr. Baglien was director of fund finance for GTIS Partners LP, where he oversaw all finance and operations for GTIS funds. Previously, he was an accounting manager at iStar Inc. with oversight of loans and special investments. Mr. Baglien received a Master of Business Administration from Kellstadt Graduate School of Business at DePaul University and a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from the University of Oregon.

Matthew Jacobs is a Managing Director and Chief Credit Officer of Real Estate, and a member of the commercial real estate Investment Committee. Prior to joining BSP in 2016, Mr. Jacobs was co-head of underwriting at Ladder Capital, where he led a team of professionals in the underwriting of CMBS loans, structured / balance sheet loans, mezzanine loans and equity investments. Prior to joining Ladder, Mr. Jacobs worked in Deloitte’s Financial Advisory Services practice, where he provided valuation services to various real estate lenders and investors. Additionally, Mr. Jacobs previously worked at UBS Real Estate Securities, focusing on the underwriting of various CRE loans. Mr. Jacobs received a Bachelor of Arts from Washington University in St. Louis.

Tanya Mollova is a Managing Director and member of the commercial real estate Investment Committee. Prior to joining BSP in 2015, Ms. Mollova was an executive director at CIBC in the commercial real estate group, where she focused on CMBS underwriting. Prior to joining CIBC, Ms. Mollova headed underwriting for Contemporary Healthcare Capital, where she closed mezzanine and preferred equity transactions with concentration on senior housing and healthcare. Previously, Ms. Mollova worked as a structured finance associate director in the CMBS group at Fitch Ratings. Ms. Mollova received a Bachelor of Arts from St. Lawrence University.

122

ITEM 6. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation of Executive Officers

None of our executive officers receives direct compensation from us. We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees in the foreseeable future. The services necessary for the operation of our business will be provided to us by individuals who are employees of our Advisor and Administrator pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement. Our day-to-day investment operations will be managed by the Advisor. Most of the services necessary for the sourcing and administration of our investment portfolio are provided by investment professionals employed by the Advisor or its affiliates.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Company will bear its allocable portion of the costs of the compensation, benefits, and related administrative expenses (including travel expenses) of its officers who provide operational and administrative services under the Administration Agreement, their respective staffs and other professionals who provide services to the Company (including, in each case, employees of the Administrator or an affiliate) who assist with the preparation, coordination, and administration of the foregoing or provide other “back office” or “middle office” financial or operational services to the Company. The Company reimburses the Advisor (or its affiliates) for an allocable portion of the compensation paid by the Advisor (or its affiliates) to such individuals (based on a percentage of time such individuals devote, on an estimated basis, to the business and affairs of the Company and in acting on behalf of the Company). See “Item 1. Business—Investment Advisory Agreement” and “Item 7. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Trustee Independence.”

Compensation of Trustees

No compensation is paid to our trustees who are “interested persons,” as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Our Independent Trustees receive an annual fee of  $40,000. Each trustee receives $2,500 per each meeting that such trustee attends. Each trustee receives $1,000 per each committee that such trustee is a member of.

We are also authorized to pay the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of each Independent Trustee incurred by such trustee in connection with the fulfillment of his or her duties as an Independent Trustee.

123

ITEM 7. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND TRUSTEE INDEPENDENCE

Co-Investment Transactions

The 1940 Act generally prohibits BDCs from entering into negotiated co-investments with affiliates absent an order from the SEC.

Affiliates of the Company have obtained an Order from the SEC that permits us greater flexibility to negotiate the terms of co-investments if our Board of Trustees determines that it would be advantageous for us to co-invest with other accounts sponsored or managed by the Advisor or its affiliates in a manner consistent with our investment objectives, positions, policies, strategies, and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. Pursuant to the terms of the Order, and in accordance with other provisions of the 1940 Act, we expect to co-invest with other affiliates of the Advisor, unless doing so is impermissible under existing regulatory guidance, applicable regulations, or our allocation policies and procedures.

Under the terms of the Order, a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of our Independent Trustees is required to make certain determinations in connection with a proposed co-investment transaction, including that (1) the terms of the proposed transaction are reasonable and fair to us and our shareholders and do not involve overreaching in respect of us or our shareholders on the part of any person concerned and (2) the transaction is consistent with the interests of our shareholders and is consistent with our investment strategies and policies. We believe that co-investment by us and accounts sponsored or managed by the Advisor and its affiliates affords us additional investment opportunities and an ability to build a diverse portfolio.

The Company may also co-invest alongside Benefit Street Partners affiliates pursuant to other regulations and interpretations of the 1940 Act, for example, if the only term negotiated as to the investment is price. Subject to the terms of the Order, or, as applicable, other 1940 Act restrictions on co-investments with affiliates, the Advisor intends to offer the Company the right to participate in investment opportunities that it determines meet certain “Board Established Criteria” under the terms of the Order and that are appropriate for the Company in view of its investment objectives, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions, as well as regulatory requirements and other relevant factors. Such offers are subject to the exception that the Company will not participate in each individual opportunity but will, on an overall basis, be entitled to participate equitably with other entities sponsored or managed by Benefit Street Partners. The Board of Trustees will approve and will regularly review these allocation policies and procedures.

Benefit Street Partners and its affiliates have other clients with similar or competing investment objectives, including other private funds, separately managed accounts, structured credit vehicles and similar investment vehicles sponsored or managed by Affiliated Funds that are pursuing an investment strategy that may overlap with ours.

To the extent the Company competes with one or more Affiliated Funds for a particular investment opportunity, the Advisor will allocate investment opportunities across the entities for which such opportunities are appropriate, consistent with (1) the Advisor’s allocation policies and procedures, (2) the requirements of the Advisers Act and (3) certain restrictions under the 1940 Act regarding co-investments with affiliates, as modified by no-action relief granted by the SEC as well as the Order, in each case in compliance with the terms and conditions of such no-action relief or the Order. Benefit Street Partners’ allocation policies are intended to ensure that all its clients, including the Company, are treated equitably over time, and that the Company generally shares equitably in investment opportunities with other Affiliated Funds.

Conflicts Relating to the Advisor and Administrator

Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, our Advisor oversees the management of our activities and is responsible for making investment decisions with respect to our portfolio.

124

Responsibilities of the Advisor

Subject to the overall supervision of our Board of Trustees, our Advisor manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to us. Under the terms of our Investment Advisory Agreement, our Advisor, among other things:

• Determines the composition and allocation of our investment portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes therein and the manner of implementing such changes;

• Identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the investments we make;

• Performs due diligence on prospective portfolio companies;

• Arranges financings and borrowing facilities for us;

• Executes, closes, monitors and services our investments;

• Determines the securities and other assets that we will purchase, retain, or sell; and

• Provides us with such other investment advisory, research and related services as we may, from time to time, reasonably require for the investment of our funds.

We rely, in part, on our Advisor to manage our day-to-day activities and to implement our investment strategy. Our Advisor and certain of its affiliates are presently, and plan in the future to continue to be, involved with activities which are unrelated to us. As a result of these activities, our Advisor and certain of its affiliates and their respective employees will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between us and other activities in which they are or may become involved. Therefore, our Advisor and its affiliates and their respective personnel may experience conflicts of interest in allocating management time, services, and functions among us and any other business ventures in which they or any of their key personnel, as applicable, are or may become involved. This could result in actions that are more favorable to other affiliated entities than to us. However, our Advisor believes that it and its affiliates have sufficient personnel to discharge fully their responsibilities to all activities in which they are involved. They are free to furnish similar services to other entities so long as their services to us are not impaired.

Fiduciary Duty of Investment Advisor

Our Advisor has a fiduciary responsibility for the safekeeping and use of all of our funds and assets, whether or not in our Advisor’s immediate possession or control. Our Advisor may not employ, or permit another to employ, such funds or assets in any manner except for the exclusive benefit of us. In addition, our Advisor may not, by entry into an agreement with any of our shareholders otherwise, contract away the fiduciary obligation owed to us and our shareholders under common law.

Investment Advisory Agreement

The Advisor serves as our investment adviser pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, which has been approved by our Board of Trustees and will be effective as of the election to be regulated as a BDC. Unless terminated earlier, it will remain in effect for an initial two-year term and then continue in effect from year to year if approved annually by our Board of Trustees or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities, including, in either case, approval by a majority of our trustees who are not interested persons. The Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. The Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated by us without penalty upon not less than 60 days’ written notice and by the Advisor upon not less than 60 days’ written notice. Any termination by us must be authorized either by our Board of Trustees or by vote of our shareholders.

In determining to approve the Investment Advisory Agreement, our Board of Trustees requested information from the Advisor that enabled it to evaluate a number of factors relevant to its determination. These

125

factors included the nature, quality and extent of services performed by the Advisor, the Advisor’s ability to manage conflicts of interest effectively, our short and long-term performance, our costs, including as compared to comparable BDCs that engage in similar investing activities, the Advisor’s profitability, any economies of scale, and any other benefits of the relationship for the Advisor. Based on the information reviewed and the considerations detailed above, our Board of Trustees, including all of our trustees who are not interested persons of us or the Advisor, concluded that the investment advisory fee rates and terms are fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided and approved the Investment Advisory Agreement as being in the best interests of our shareholders.

The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, the Advisor and its officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of the Advisor’s services under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser.

Administration Agreement

We have entered into the Administration Agreement with our Administrator and will reimburse it for the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by our Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including our allocable portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of our Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Financial Officer.

Other Conflicts

The Advisor may, in its discretion, have, and may, in its discretion, cause the Company to have, ongoing business dealings, arrangements or agreements with persons who are former employees or executives of the Advisor or the Advisor’s affiliates. The Company bears, directly or indirectly, the costs of such dealings, arrangements or agreements. In such circumstances, there may be a conflict of interest between the Advisor and the Company in determining whether to engage in or to continue such dealings, arrangements or agreements, including the possibility that the Advisor may favor the engagement or continued engagement of such persons even if a better price and/or quality of service could be obtained from another person.

The Advisor, its affiliates and the Company will often engage common legal counsel and other advisers in a particular transaction, including transactions in which there may be conflicts of interest. Members of the law firms engaged to represent the Company may be investors in a Company or a related fund and may also represent one or more portfolio companies or investors in the Company or a related fund. In the event of a significant dispute or divergence of interest between the Company and the Advisor and/or its affiliates, the parties may engage separate counsel in the sole discretion of the Advisor and its affiliates. Moreover, in litigation and certain other circumstances separate representation may be required. Additionally, the Advisor, its affiliates and the Company and the portfolio companies may engage other common service providers. In such circumstances, there may be a conflict of interest between the Advisor, on the one hand, and the Company and portfolio companies, on the other hand, in determining whether to engage such service providers, including the possibility that the Advisor may favor the engagement or continued engagement of such persons if it receives a benefit from such service providers, such as lower fees, that it would not receive absent the engagement of such service provider by the Company and/or the portfolio companies.

Trustee Independence

For information regarding the independence of our trustees, see “Item 5. Trustees and Executive Officers.”

126

ITEM 8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Neither we nor our Advisor or our Administrator is currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us, or against our Advisor or Administrator.

As of May 31, 2024, we were not defendants in any material pending legal proceeding, and no such material proceedings were known to be contemplated. However, from time to time, we may be party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business including the enforcement of our rights under loans to or other contracts with our portfolio companies. Third parties may also seek to impose liability on us in connection with the activities of our portfolio companies.

127

ITEM 9. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

Our outstanding Common Shares will be offered and sold in private offerings exempt from registration under the Securities Act under Section 4(a)(2), Regulation D and Regulation S. There is no public market for our Common Shares currently, nor can we give any assurance that one will develop.

Because our Common Shares are being acquired by investors in one or more transactions “not involving a public offering,” they are “restricted securities” and may be required to be held indefinitely. Shareholders may not sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of (a “Transfer”) any Common Shares unless (i) the Transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and (ii) the Transfer is otherwise in compliance with the transfer restrictions set forth in our Declaration of Trust. No Transfer will be effectuated except by registration of the Transfer on the Company’s books. Each transferee will be required to execute an instrument agreeing to be bound by these restrictions and the other restrictions imposed on the Common Shares and to execute such other instruments or certifications as are reasonably required by the Company. Accordingly, an investor must be willing to bear the economic risk of investment in the Common Shares until we are liquidated.

Common Shares will be offered for subscription on a continuous basis during the Investment Period. Each investor in our private placement will purchase Common Shares pursuant to a Subscription Agreement.

The initial purchase price for our Common Shares is $25.00 per share upon our election to be regulated as a BDC. Thereafter, the purchase price per Common Share will equal our per share NAV as determined within 48 hours of the applicable Drawdown Date, excluding Sundays and holidays, of such sale, subject to certain exceptions and calculated in accordance with the 1940 Act.

Distribution

To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our shareholders each year dividends equal to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which is computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction, excludes net capital gain and does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). To the extent that we satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed income (including net capital gain). In addition, we will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which our distributions in any calendar year are less than minimum amounts specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. We intend to make distributions to our shareholders in a manner that will satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and avoid corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax.

Our Board of Trustees intends to declare and pay distributions on a quarterly basis. We do not have a distribution reinvestment plan and expect to pay all distributions in cash. The timing and amount of any future distributions to stockholders are subject to applicable legal restrictions and the sole discretion of our Board of Trustees.

We have not established limits on the amount of funds we may use from available sources to fund distributions. We may have distributions which could be characterized as a return of capital for tax purposes.

Valuation

We expect to determine our NAV for the Shares each month as of the last day of each calendar month and as necessary for each Drawdown Purchase, which will be subject to the limitations of Section 23(b) of the 1940 Act (which generally prohibits us from issuing Shares at a price below the then-current net asset value of the

128

Shares as determined within 48 hours, excluding Sundays and holidays, of such issuance (taking into account any investment valuation adjustments from the latest quarterly valuation date in accordance with the valuation policies and procedures of the Company and the Advisor), subject to certain exceptions). The NAV per Share will be equal to the value of the Company’s total assets minus liabilities and any preferred shares outstanding divided by the total number of Shares outstanding.

Each month, we will value investments in our portfolio, and such values are disclosed each quarter in reports filed with the SEC. The Board of Trustees has designated the Advisor as its “valuation designee” pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act, and in that role the Advisor is responsible for performing fair value determinations relating to all of our investments, including periodically assessing and managing any material valuation risks and establishing and applying fair value methodologies, in accordance with valuation policies and procedures that have been approved by the Board of Trustees. Although the Board of Trustees designated the Advisor as “valuation designee,” the Board of Trustees ultimately is responsible for fair value determinations under the 1940 Act.

Investments for which market quotations are readily available are typically valued at the average bid and ask prices of such market quotations, which are generally obtained from independent pricing services, broker-dealers or market makers. To validate market quotations, the Company will utilize a number of factors to determine if the quotations are representative of fair value, including the source and number of the quotations. Debt and equity securities for which market quotations are not readily available or are deemed not to represent fair value, are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Advisor, in accordance with a valuation policy approved by the Board of Trustees and a consistently applied valuation process. Investments purchased within the quarter before the valuation date and debt investments with remaining maturities of 60 days or less may each be valued at cost with interest accrued or discount accreted/premium amortized to the date of maturity (although they are typically valued at available market quotations), unless such valuation, in the judgment of the Advisor, does not represent fair value.

Reports to Shareholders

The Company will furnish to shareholders as soon as commercially practicable after the end of each taxable year and each calendar year such information as is necessary for them to complete U.S. federal and state income tax or information returns, along with any other tax information required by law.

Annual and quarterly reports, including audited financial statements filed with the SEC, will be made available to investors.

Depending on legal requirements, the Company may provide this information to shareholders via U.S. mail or other courier, electronic delivery, or some combination of the foregoing. Information about the Company will also be available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

129

ITEM 10. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

We have not yet commenced commercial activities. On April 5, 2024, an affiliate of our Advisor purchased $1,500 of Common Shares of the Company at a price of $25.00 per Common Share as our initial capital. These Common Shares were issued and sold in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, which provides an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

130

ITEM 11. DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED

The following description is based on relevant portions of our Declaration of Trust and bylaws. This summary is not necessarily complete, and we refer investors to our Declaration of Trust and bylaws for a more detailed description of the provisions summarized below.

Description of our Common Shares

General

The terms of the Declaration of Trust authorize an unlimited number of Common Shares. There is currently no market for the Common Shares, and there can be no assurance that a market for the Common Shares will develop in the future.

Common Shares

Under the terms of the Company’s Declaration of Trust, all Common Shares, when they are issued in accordance with the terms of the Declaration of Trust, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. Dividends and distributions may be paid to shareholders if, as and when authorized by the Board of Trustees and declared by the Company out of funds legally available therefore. Except as may be provided by the Board of Trustees in setting the terms of classified or reclassified shares, the Common Shares will have no preemptive, exchange, conversion, appraisal or redemption rights. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each of the Common Shares would be entitled to share pro rata in all of the Company’s assets that are legally available for distribution after the Company pays all debts and other liabilities and subject to any preferential rights of holders of the Company’s preferred shares, if any preferred shares are outstanding at such time. Subject to the rights of holders of any other class or series of shares, each whole share of the Common Shares will be entitled to one vote (and each fractional share of the Common Shares will be entitled to a proportionate fractional vote) on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders, including the election of Trustees. Except as may be provided by the Board of Trustees in setting the terms of classified or reclassified shares, and subject to the express terms of any class or series of preferred shares, the shareholders shall have no power to vote on any matter except matters on which a vote of shareholders is required by the 1940 Act, the Declaration of Trust or resolution of the Trustees. There will be no cumulative voting in the election or removal of Trustees. Subject to the special rights of the holders of any class or series of preferred shares to elect Trustees, each Trustee will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast with respect to such Trustee’s election. Pursuant to, and in accordance with, the Declaration of Trust, the Board of Trustees may amend the Declaration of Trust to alter the vote required to elect trustees.

Preferred Shares

Under the terms of the Declaration of Trust, our Board of Trustees is authorized to issue preferred shares in one or more series without shareholder approval. Prior to the issuance of shares of each series, our Board of Trustees is required by the Declaration of Trust to set the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each series. The 1940 Act limits our flexibility as certain rights and preferences of the preferred shares require, among other things: (i) immediately after issuance and before any distribution is made with respect to shares, we must meet an asset coverage ratio of total assets to total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and preferred shares, of at least 150%; and (ii) the holders of preferred shares, if any are issued, must be entitled as a class to elect two Trustees at all times and to elect a majority of the Trustees if and for so long as dividends on the preferred shares are unpaid in an amount equal to two full years of dividends on the preferred shares.

131

Transfer and Resale Restrictions

To the fullest extent permitted by law, shareholders may not sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of (a “Transfer”) any Common Shares unless (i) the Transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and (ii) the Transfer is otherwise in compliance with the transfer restrictions as set forth in our Declaration of Trust. No Transfer will be effectuated except by registration of the Transfer on our books. Each transferee must agree to be bound by these restrictions and all other obligations as a shareholder.

Redemptions by the Company

Each Common Share is subject to redemption (out of the assets of the Company) by the Company at the redemption price equal to the then-current NAV per Common Share of the Company determined in accordance with the Declaration of Trust at any time if the Trustees determine in their sole discretion that a shareholder has breached any of its representations or warranties contained in such shareholder’s Subscription Agreement with the Company, and upon such redemption the holders of the Common Shares so redeemed shall have no further right with respect thereto other than to receive payment of such redemption price.

Delaware Law and Certain Declaration of Trust Provisions

Organization and Duration

We are organized as a Delaware statutory trust and will remain in existence until dissolved in accordance with our Declaration of Trust or pursuant to Delaware law.

Purpose

Under the Declaration of Trust, the purpose of the Company is to conduct, operate and carry on the business of a business development company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. In furtherance of the foregoing, it shall be the purpose of the Company to do everything necessary, suitable, convenient or proper for the conduct, promotion and attainment of any businesses and purposes which at any time may be incidental or may appear conducive or expedient for the accomplishment of the business of a business development company regulated under the 1940 Act and which may be engaged in or carried on by a statutory trust organized under the Delaware Statutory Trust Statute, and in connection therewith the Company shall have the power and authority to engage in the foregoing and may exercise all of the powers conferred by the laws of the State of Delaware upon a Delaware statutory trust. The Company shall not be deemed to be a general partnership, limited partnership, joint venture, joint stock company or corporation, but nothing herein shall preclude the Company from being treated for tax purposes as a partnership, association, corporation or REIT or being disregarded for tax purposes as an entity separate from its owners under the Code. The Company intends to elect to be treated as a REIT, as of its first taxable year, for federal, and applicable state and local, income tax purposes, and has the right to change such election at any time subject to any restrictions set forth in the Declaration of Trust.

Agreement to be Bound by the Declaration of Trust; Power of Attorney

By subscribing for the Common Shares, investors will be deemed to have agreed to be bound by the terms of the Declaration of Trust. Pursuant to the Declaration of Trust, each shareholder and each person who acquires Common Shares from a shareholder grants to the Trustees and the officers of the Company (and any substitute or successor Trustees or any substitute or successor officer of the Company) (and, if appointed, any liquidator of the Company) a power of attorney to, among other things, execute and file documents required for our qualification, continuance or dissolution. The power of attorney also grants our Board of Trustees the authority to make certain amendments to, and to make consents and waivers under and in accordance with, the Declaration of Trust.

Action by Shareholders

The shareholders will only have voting rights as required by the 1940 Act or as otherwise provided for in the Declaration of Trust. Under the Declaration of Trust, the Company is not required to hold annual meetings and does not intend to do so. Special meetings called by the Trustees will be limited to the purposes for any such

132

special meeting set forth in the notice thereof. Special meetings shall be called by any Trustee for any proper purpose upon written request of shareholders of the Company holding in the aggregate not less than thirty-three and one-third percent (331/3%) of the outstanding Common Shares of the Company, such request specifying the purpose or purposes for which such meeting is to be called, provided that in the case of a meeting called by any Trustee at the request of shareholders for the purpose of electing Trustees or removing the Advisor, written request of shareholders of the Company holding in the aggregate not less than fifty-one percent (51%) of the outstanding Common Shares of the Company or class or series of Common Shares having voting rights on the matter shall be required. These provisions will have the effect of significantly reducing the ability of shareholders being able to have proposals considered at a meeting of shareholders.

With respect to special meetings of shareholders, only the business specified in our notice of the meeting may be brought before the meeting. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Trustees at a special meeting may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by the Board of Trustees or (3) provided that the Board of Trustees has determined that trustees will be elected at the meeting, by a shareholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting.

A Trustee may be removed for cause only by action taken by a majority of the remaining Trustees (or in the case of the removal of a Trustee that is not an “interested person” as defined in the 1940 Act, a majority of the remaining Trustees that are not “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act) and by the holders of at least a majority of the Common Shares then entitled to vote in an election of such Trustee.

Amendment of the Declaration of Trust; No Approval by Shareholders

The Trustees may, without shareholder vote, amend or otherwise supplement the Declaration of Trust. Shareholders shall only have the right to vote: (i) on any amendment to the amendment provision of the Declaration of Trust, (ii) on any amendment that would adversely affect the powers, preferences or special rights of the Common Shares as determined by the Trustees in good faith and (iii) on any amendment submitted to them by the Trustees. In addition, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Declaration of Trust, in connection with an Exchange Listing, the Trustees may, without the approval or vote of the shareholders, amend or supplement the Declaration of Trust in any manner, including, without limitation to classify the Board of Trustees, to permit annual meetings of shareholders, to impose advance notice provisions for the bringing of shareholder nominations or proposals, to impose super-majority approval for certain types of transactions, to impose “control share” type provisions and to otherwise add provisions that may be deemed adverse to shareholders. A proposed amendment to the Declaration of Trust requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Trustees present (a quorum being present) at a meeting for adoption or, without a meeting, written consent to the amendment by the number of Trustees required for approval at a meeting of the Trustees at which all of the Trustees are present and voted.

Merger, Conversion, Sale or Other Disposition of Assets

The Board of Trustees may, without the approval of holders of our outstanding Common Shares, cause us to, among other things, sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets in a single transaction or a series of related transactions, or approve on our behalf the sale, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets. The Board of Trustees also may, without the approval of holders of our outstanding Common Shares, cause and approve a merger, conversion or other reorganization of the Company. For example, upon consummation of the Exchange Listing, the Board is able to cause the Company to reorganize as a Maryland corporation. The Board of Trustees may also cause the sale of all or substantially all of our assets under a foreclosure or other realization without shareholder approval. Shareholders are not entitled to dissenters’ rights of appraisal under the Declaration of Trust or applicable Delaware law in the event of a merger, conversion or consolidation, a sale of all or substantially all of our assets or any other similar transaction or event. Notwithstanding the foregoing, shareholders will be given an opportunity to vote on such a transaction if required by the 1940 Act or if such a transaction is otherwise reasonably anticipated to result in a material dilution of the NAV per Share of the Company.

133

Derivative Actions

No person, other than a Trustee, who is not a shareholder shall be entitled to bring any derivative action, suit or other proceeding on behalf of the Company.

In addition to the requirements set forth in Section 3816 of the Delaware Statutory Trust Statute, a shareholder may bring a derivative action on behalf of the Company only if the following conditions are met: (i) the shareholder or shareholders must make a pre-suit demand upon the Board of Trustees to bring the subject action unless an effort to cause the Board of Trustees to bring such an action is not likely to succeed; and a demand on the Board of Trustees shall only be deemed not likely to succeed and therefore excused if a majority of the Board of Trustees, or a majority of any committee established to consider the merits of such action, is composed of Trustees who are not “Independent Trustees” (as that term is defined in the Delaware Statutory Trust Statute); and (ii) unless a demand is not required under clause (i) above, the Board of Trustees must be afforded a reasonable amount of time to consider such shareholder request and to investigate the basis of such claim; and the Board of Trustees shall be entitled to retain counsel and other advisors in considering the merits of the request and may require an undertaking by the shareholders making such request to reimburse the Company for the expense of any such counsel and advisors in the event that the Board of Trustees determines not to bring such action. The conditions on a shareholder’s ability to bring a derivative action do not apply to claims arising under the federal securities laws. For purposes of this paragraph, the Board of Trustees may designate a committee of one or more Trustees to consider a shareholder demand.

Except for claims arising under the U.S. federal securities laws, including, without limitation, the 1940 Act, all suits, claims or other actions (collectively, “claims”) under the applicable law (i) must be brought as derivative claims, (ii) holders of at least 10% of the outstanding Common Shares, as disclosed in our Declaration of Trust, must join in the bringing of such action, and (iii) the Board of Trustees shall be entitled to retain counsel and other advisers in considering the merits of the request and may require an undertaking by the shareholders making such request to reimburse the Company for the expense of any such counsel and advisers in the event that the Board of Trustees determines not to bring such action, each shareholder agrees that any claim that affects all shareholders of the Company or any series or class equally, that is, proportionately based on their number of Common Shares in the Company or in such series of class, must be brought as a derivative claim subject to the derivative actions section of the Declaration of Trust irrespective of whether such claim involves a violation of the shareholder’s rights under the Declaration of Trust or any other alleged violation of contractual or individual rights that might otherwise give rise to a direct claim.

Exclusive Delaware Jurisdiction

Each Trustee, each officer and, except as otherwise agreed in writing by the Company, the Advisor and/or affiliates of the Advisor, each person legally or beneficially owning a Common Share or an interest in a Common Share of the Company (whether through a broker, dealer, bank, trust company or clearing corporation or an agent of any of the foregoing or otherwise), to the fullest extent permitted by law, including Section 3804(e) of the Delaware Statutory Trust Statute, (i) irrevocably agrees that any claims, suits, actions or proceedings asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs (or similar) doctrine or arising out of or relating in any way to the Company, the Delaware Statutory Trust Statute, the Declaration of Trust or the bylaws of the Company (including, without limitation, any claims, suits, actions or proceedings to interpret, apply or enforce (A) the provisions of the Declaration of Trust or the bylaws of the Company, or (B) the duties (including fiduciary duties), obligations or liabilities of the Company to the shareholders or the Board of Trustees, or of officers or the Board of Trustees to the Company, to the shareholders or each other, or (C) the rights or powers of, or restrictions on, the Company, the officers, the Board of Trustees or the shareholders, or (D) any provision of the Delaware Statutory Trust Statute or other laws of the State of Delaware pertaining to trusts made applicable to the Company pursuant to Section 3809 of the Delaware Statutory Trust Statute, or (E) any other instrument, document, agreement or certificate contemplated by any provision of the Delaware Statutory Trust Statute, the Declaration of Trust or the bylaws of the Company relating in any way to the Company (regardless, in each case, of whether such claims, suits, actions or proceedings (x) sound in contract, tort, fraud or otherwise, (y) are based

134

on common law, statutory, equitable, legal or other grounds, or (z) are derivative or direct claims)), shall be exclusively brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, any other court in the State of Delaware with subject matter jurisdiction; provided, however, that the Federal District Courts of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the 1940 Act, the Securities Act, and the Exchange Act, (ii) irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in connection with any such claim, suit, action or proceeding, (iii) irrevocably agrees not to, and waives any right to, assert in any such claim, suit, action or proceeding that (A) it is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of such courts or any other court to which proceedings in such courts may be appealed, (B) such claim, suit, action or proceeding is brought in an inconvenient forum, or (C) the venue of such claim, suit, action or proceeding is improper, (iv) consents to process being served in any such claim, suit, action or proceeding by mailing, certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy thereof to such party at the address in effect for notices under the Declaration of Trust, and agrees that such service shall constitute good and sufficient service of process and notice thereof; provided, nothing in clause (iv) hereof shall affect or limit any right to serve process in any other manner permitted by law, and (v) irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any such claim, suit, action or proceeding.

Books and Reports

We are required to keep appropriate books of our business at our principal offices. The books will be maintained for both tax and financial reporting purposes on an accrual basis in accordance with GAAP.

135

ITEM 12. INDEMNIFICATION OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

The Declaration of Trust provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, none of the Company’s officers, trustees or employees (each, an “Indemnified Person”) will be liable to the Company or to any shareholder for any act or omission performed or omitted by any such Indemnified Person (including any acts or omissions of or by another Indemnified Person), in the absence of willful misfeasance, gross negligence, bad faith, reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such Indemnified Person’s respective position or criminal wrongdoing on its part (“Indemnified Person Disabling Conduct”).

The Company will indemnify each Indemnified Person for any loss or damage incurred by it in connection with any matter arising out of, or in connection with, the Company, including the operations of the Company and the offering of Common Shares, except for losses incurred by an Indemnified Person arising solely from the Indemnified Person’s own Indemnified Person Disabling Conduct.

Under the indemnification provision of the Declaration of Trust, expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by each Indemnified Person in defending any action, suit or proceeding for which they may be entitled to indemnification shall be paid in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding. However, any such indemnification or payment or reimbursement of expenses will be subject to the applicable requirements of the 1940 Act.

So long as the Company is regulated under the 1940 Act, the above indemnification and limitation of liability is limited by the 1940 Act or by any valid rule, regulation or order of the SEC thereunder. The 1940 Act provides, among other things, that a company may not indemnify any trustee or officer against liability to it or its security holders to which he or she might otherwise be subject by reason of his or her willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence. In addition, the Company has obtained liability insurance for its officers and trustees.

136

ITEM 13. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Set forth below is an index to our financial statements attached to this Registration Statement.

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of April 10, 2024		F-2
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period from March 11, 2024, (date of inception) to April 10, 2024		F-3
Consolidated Notes to Financial Statements		F-4

137

ITEM 14. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There are not and have not been any disagreements between us and our accountant on any matter of accounting principles, practices, or financial statement disclosure.

138

ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

(a) List separately all financial statements filed

The financial statements attached to this Registration Statement are listed under “Item 13. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

(b) Exhibits

(c) Exhibit Index

3.1	Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust(1)
3.2	Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust*
3.3	Bylaws(1)
4.1	Form of Subscription Agreement*
10.1	Form of Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement*
10.2	Form of Administration Agreement(1)
10.3	Fund of Funds Agreement*
10.4	Form of Expense Limitation Agreement*
10.5	Form of Fee Waiver Agreement*
10.6	Form of Custodial Agreement*

(1) Previously filed in connection with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56653) filed on April 22, 2024.

(*) Filed herewith

139

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amendment no. 1 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Franklin BSP Real Estate Debt BDC
By:	/s/ Richard J. Byrne
	Name: Richard J. Byrne
	Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 13, 2024

140

FRANKLIN BSP REAL ESTATE DEBT BDC

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of April  10, 2024		F-2
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period from March  11, 2024 (date of inception) to April 10, 2024		F-3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-4

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholder of Franklin BSP Real Estate Debt BDC

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of assets and liabilities of Franklin BSP Real Estate Debt BDC and its subsidiary (the “Company”) as of April 10, 2024, and the related consolidated statement of operations for the period from March 11, 2024 (date of inception) to April 10, 2024, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of April 10, 2024, and the results of its operations for the period from March 11, 2024 (date of inception) to April 10, 2024 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Atlanta, Georgia

June 11, 2024

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2024.

F-1

FRANKLIN BSP REAL ESTATE DEBT BDC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

	April 10, 2024
ASSETS
Cash	$	1,500
Deferred offering costs (See Note 2)		334,621
Total assets	$	336,121
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	919,706
Total liabilities	$	919,706
NET ASSETS
Common stock, $0.001 par value, unlimited shares authorized, 60 shares issued and outstanding (1)	$	0
Additional paid in capital		1,500
Accumulated net income/(loss)		(585,085	)
Total net assets/(deficit)	$	(583,585	)
Total liabilities and net assets/(deficit)	$	336,121
Net asset value per share	$	(9,726	)

⁽¹⁾ Less than $1.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

FRANKLIN BSP REAL ESTATE DEBT BDC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

	For the period from March 11, 2024 (date of inception) to April 10, 2024
Income
Total income	$	—
Expenses
Organizational costs (See Note 2)	$	585,085
Total expenses	$	585,085
Net investment income/(loss)	$	(585,085	)
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	(585,085	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

FRANKLIN BSP REAL ESTATE DEBT BDC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the period from March 11, 2024 (date of inception) to April 10, 2024

Note 1—Organization

Franklin BSP Real Estate Debt BDC (the “Company”) is a newly formed, externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that intends to elect to be regulated as a business development company (a “BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) and intends to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and to qualify annually thereafter, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). The Company was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on March 11, 2024 (date of inception). As a BDC, the Company must comply with certain regulatory requirements.

The Company will be externally managed by Benefit Street Partners, L.L.C. (the “Advisor”). The Company’s Advisor is a limited liability company that is registered as an investment advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). The Advisor oversees the management of the Company’s activities and is responsible for making investment decisions with respect to the Company’s portfolio.

The Company’s investment objectives are to seek to provide high current income while maintaining downside protection. The Company will seek to invest in assets that will enable it to:

• provide current income in the form of regular, stable cash distributions to achieve an attractive distribution yield;

• preserve and protect invested capital, by primarily focusing on high-quality credit investments supported by current cash-flow and/or limited business plan risk in the underlying assets;

• reduce downside risk through conservative loan-to-value ratios against high-quality real assets, with a focus on multi-family lending and with meaningful borrower equity; and

• provide an investment alternative for shareholders seeking to allocate a portion of their long-term investment portfolios to commercial real estate (“CRE”) debt with expected lower volatility than publicly traded securities and compelling risk-adjusted returns compared to fixed income alternatives.

The Company intends to use its proceeds from its private offering of common shares (the “offering”) to finance the Company’s investment objectives. The Company’s investment strategy is to originate, acquire, finance and manage a portfolio of primarily CRE investments, focused on senior secured, CRE loans across a wide range of geography. The Company will focus its investments in the middle market, with loans in the range of $25—$100 million, across a mix of asset classes, but maintain a focus on multi-family lending. To a lesser extent, the Company may invest in, or originate, other real-estate related debt and equity investments, which may include subordinated debt, commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”).

The Company will seek to focus on a flexible mix of credit and other real estate investments associated with high-quality assets to generate current cash flow. The Company seeks to identify attractive risk-reward investment opportunities with a focus on financing middle market investments.

The Company is a fixed-term BDC, meaning it is an investment vehicle of defined duration. Following the initial closing, the Company will have an investment period (the “Investment Period”) of 18 months during which it may invest capital commitments and reinvest proceeds in line with the Company’s investment strategy. The term of the Company shall not extend beyond the 4 year anniversary of the end of the Investment Period.

On April 9, 2024, BSP Fund Holdco (Debt Strategy) L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Advisor, purchased 60 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”), which represented all of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,500.

F-4

FRANKLIN BSP REAL ESTATE DEBT BDC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the period from March 11, 2024 (date of inception) to April 10, 2024

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Company in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company is an investment company and accordingly applies specific accounting and financial reporting requirements under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946, Financial Services-Investment Companies.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in these consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The Company will generally consolidate any wholly or substantially owned subsidiary when the design and purpose of the subsidiary is to act as an extension of the Company’s investment operations and to facilitate the execution of the Company’s investment strategy. Accordingly, the Company consolidated the results of its wholly or substantially owned subsidiary in its consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in banks and short-term, liquid investments in a money market deposit account. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value.

Income Taxes

The Company intends to elect to be treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2024. Furthermore, the Company intends to operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Code so long as the Company’s board of trustees (the “Board of Trustees”) determines that REIT qualification remains in the Company’s best interest.

The Company evaluates tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether it is “more-likely-than-not” (i.e., greater than 50-percent) that each tax position will be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. The Company did not record any tax provision in the current period. However, management’s conclusions regarding tax positions taken may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, examination by tax authorities on-going analysis of and changes to tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof.

Organization and Offering Costs

Organization costs consist of costs incurred to establish the Company and enable it legally to do business. Organization costs are expensed as incurred. Offering costs consist of costs incurred in connection with the offering. Offering costs are capitalized as a deferred charge and will be recorded as a reduction to paid-in capital when the offering is completed, which has not yet occurred.

F-5

FRANKLIN BSP REAL ESTATE DEBT BDC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the period from March 11, 2024 (date of inception) to April 10, 2024

The Company will bear the organization and offering expenses incurred in connection with the formation of the Company and the offering, including certain out of pocket expenses of the Advisor and its agents and affiliates under the Company’s investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”). In addition, the Advisor may request reimbursement from the Company for the organization and offering costs it incurs on the Company’s behalf.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Management does not believe any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 3—Related Party Transactions

Investment Advisory Agreement

The Company intends to enter into the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Advisor in which the Advisor, subject to the overall supervision of the Company’s Board of Trustees, manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to the Company.

Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Advisor, the Company expects to pay the Advisor a fee for investment advisory and management services consisting of two components—a base management fee (the “Management Fee”) and an incentive fee (the “Incentive Fee”).

There were no Management Fees or Incentive Fees incurred during the period from March 11, 2024 (date of inception) to April 10, 2024.

Administration Agreement

The Company intends to enter into an administration agreement with Benefit Street Partners (the “Administration Agreement”), pursuant to which the Benefit Street Partners (in such capacity, the “Administrator”) will provide the Company with office facilities and certain administrative services necessary for the Company to conduct its business. At the request of the Administrator, the Company may reimburse certain costs and expenses incurred in connection with this agreement.

Note 4—Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation and Regulatory Matters

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to litigation, claims, and regulatory matters. The Company has no knowledge of material legal or regulatory proceedings pending or known to be contemplated against the Company at this time.

Indemnifications

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company may enter into contracts or agreements that contain indemnifications or warranties. Future events could occur that lead to the execution of these provisions against the Company. Based on its history and experience, management feels that the likelihood of such an event is remote. Accordingly, the Company has not accrued any liability in conjunction with such indemnifications.

F-6

FRANKLIN BSP REAL ESTATE DEBT BDC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the period from March 11, 2024 (date of inception) to April 10, 2024

Note 5—Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through June 11, 2024, the date the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued.

On May 30, 2024, the Company entered into both the Investment Advisory Agreement and Administration Agreement.

On June 6, 2024, the Company filed its election to be regulated as a BDC.

On June 7, 2024, the Investment Advisory Agreement was amended and restated (the “Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement”) and the Company and the Advisor entered a separate Fee Waiver Agreement to waive (i) the Management Fee owed to the Advisor for the duration of the term of the Company, (ii) the Incentive Fee for a period of 12 months after the initial closing, and (iii) provide that any such waived Management Fees or Incentive Fees would not be subject to recoupment by the Advisor. In addition, the Company entered into an Expense Limitation Agreement (the “Expense Limitation Agreement”) with the Advisor, under which the Advisor has agreed to reimburse certain specified expenses, to the extent such annualized expenses exceed 0.10% of the Company’s quarter-end net asset value.

F-7