WESBANCO, INC. FQ3 2024 EARNINGS CALL OCT 24, 2024
Yes. I would tell you that, well, first, we’re always reinvesting, right? So — but generally speaking, I would tell you that that $4 million, which is about $1 million a quarter, call it, should be — more or less drop into the bottom line. If we think about expense run rate kind of forward, I would tell you, and I said in my prepared remarks that we’re not anticipating much difference from what we reported here in the third quarter.
The one thing or a couple of things I would tell you, though, that would be different from third quarter versus fourth quarter on expense run rate is for our sellers and wages, our hourly employees, their merit increases occur in August, and so we’ll have a full quarter’s worth of merit increases in the fourth quarter versus kind of having 2/3 of that merit increase in the third quarter.
Also, health care can be very difficult to predict. But I would say, typically in that fourth quarter, health care expenses are a bit higher just because employees have kind of burned through their deductibles. And at that point, the cost for any additional medical procedures is on the company. And then I would just tell you it’s kind of some offsetting things, that we had a pretty big marketing campaign, as we talked about on our prepared commentary. I wouldn’t expect marketing expense to be quite as high as what we experienced in the third quarter. So some puts and takes, but I think overall pretty close to third quarter, maybe a little bit heavier.
Operator
The next question comes from Catherine Mealor with KBW.
Catherine Fitzhugh Summerson Mealor
Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
Just a small question. But on fees, I noticed that other income was down a little bit. What was the driver there? And should we expect that to bounce back to that kind of $5 million level we’ve seen in the past few quarters?
Daniel K. Weiss
Senior Executive VP & CFO
Yes. On noninterest income, the driver really was in swap fees. The valuation adjustment this quarter was a negative $1.7 million compared to a positive $1.4 million in the third quarter of ‘23. So that swing is really what’s causing — probably, if you’re looking kind of year-over-year or even quarter-over — linked quarter, for that matter, that’s what’s driving it.
We don’t expect that to occur here again in the fourth quarter. But again, that is — that’s pure valuation. That’s not necessarily an indication of anything other than just movement in interest rates relative to where those back-to-back swaps were booked.
Catherine Fitzhugh Summerson Mealor
Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
You had that lumped together in others. So that makes sense. And then back to the margin, the 3.70% to 3.80% NIM that you mentioned, just wanted to confirm that that is where you were thinking that the pro forma margin goes kind of at close with Premier, including accretable yield? To kind of a second — go ahead.
Daniel K. Weiss
Senior Executive VP & CFO
No, I’m not — I don’t believe I quoted 3.70% to 3.80%.
Catherine Fitzhugh Summerson Mealor
Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
I’m sorry — I’m sorry, 3.45% to 3.50%, I misspoke.
Daniel K. Weiss
Senior Executive VP & CFO
Yes. Yes. Yes. correct. I’m sorry, what was the question?
Catherine Fitzhugh Summerson Mealor
Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
The 3.45% to 3.50% pro forma margin that you mentioned. That was — can you — what exactly are you pointing to with that 3.45%, 3.50% comment?
6