UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-2794
MFS SERIES TRUST III
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
500 Boylston Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Susan S. Newton
Massachusetts Financial Services Company
500 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(Name and address of agents for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 954-5000
Date of fiscal year end: January 31
Date of reporting period: July 31, 2009
ITEM 1. | REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS. |
MFS® High Income Fund
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ
NO BANK GUARANTEE
7/31/09
MFH-SEM
LETTER FROM THE CEO
Dear Shareholders:
In the fall of 2008, the markets took investors on what was perhaps the most tumultuous ride of their lives. Many are now debating when the market will stage a sustainable recovery, but not even the most experienced investor can provide a definitive answer to that question.
Even so, the basic rules of investing have not changed, and the turbulence reinforced the benefits of investing through the waves. Investors who jumped ship early on may have regretted their decisions when the markets gained some traction in the early half of this year. While anyone with a short-term horizon may have needed to take some action, most with longer-term goals probably found the best option was to stick with their long-term strategy.
At MFS® we believe investors are always best served by developing a plan with their investment professionals that addresses specific long-term needs. Most advisors agree that yearly reviews are important to monitor a plan’s progress. Most would also caution their clients against reacting too quickly to the daily news. When markets do recover, they often gain ground in quick, sudden bursts. If you are out of the market, you can easily miss the benefits of these rallies.
Few of us would again like to live through the kind of market turmoil we saw over the past year. But as turbulent as markets were, in our view, they proved that the fundamental principles of long-term investing still apply.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer
MFS Investment Management®
September 15, 2009
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio structure (i)
| | |
Top five industries (i) | | |
Energy - Independent | | 7.3% |
Medical & Health Technology & Services | | 6.8% |
Utilities - Electric Power | | 6.6% |
Gaming & Lodging | | 6.1% |
Cable TV | | 5.1% |
| | |
Credit quality of bonds (r) | | |
AAA | | 3.5% |
AA | | 0.1% |
A | | 0.8% |
BBB | | 1.9% |
BB | | 24.7% |
B | | 41.5% |
CCC | | 20.5% |
CC | | 3.0% |
C | | 0.1% |
D | | 1.3% |
Not Rated | | 2.6% |
| | |
Portfolio facts | | |
Average Duration (d)(i) | | 3.6 |
Average Effective Maturity (i)(m) | | 5.4 yrs. |
Average Credit Quality of Rated Securities (long-term) (a) | | B+ |
Average Credit Quality of Rated Securities (short-term) (a)(c) | | A-1 |
(a) | The average credit quality of rated securities is based upon a market weighted average of portfolio holdings that are rated by public rating agencies. |
(c) | Includes holding in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is not rated by a public rating agency. The average credit quality of rated securities (short-term) is based upon a market weighted average of the underlying holdings within the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio that are rated by public rating agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the bond component includes accrued interest amounts and may be positively or negatively impacted by the equivalent exposure from any derivative holdings, if applicable. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
(r) | Each security is assigned a rating from Moody’s Investors Service. If not rated by Moody’s, the rating will be that assigned by Standard & Poor’s. Likewise, if not assigned a rating by Standard & Poor’s, it will be based on the rating assigned by Fitch, Inc. For those portfolios that hold a security which is not rated by any of the three agencies, the security is considered Not Rated. Holdings in U.S. Treasuries and government agency mortgage-backed securities, if any, are included in the “AAA”-rating category. Percentages are based on the total market value of investments as of 7/31/09. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 7/31/09, unless otherwise noted.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
2
EXPENSE TABLE
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
February 1, 2009 through July 31, 2009
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period February 1, 2009 through July 31, 2009.
The expenses include the payment of a portion of the transfer-agent-related expenses of MFS funds that invest in the fund. For further information, please see the Notes to the Financial Statements.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the
3
Expense Table – continued
relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | | Beginning Account Value 2/01/09 | | Ending Account Value 7/31/09 | | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 2/01/09-7/31/09 |
A | | Actual | | 1.05% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,247.53 | | $5.85 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.05% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,019.59 | | $5.26 |
B | | Actual | | 1.79% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,242.35 | | $9.95 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.79% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,015.92 | | $8.95 |
C | | Actual | | 1.79% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,242.31 | | $9.95 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.79% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,015.92 | | $8.95 |
I | | Actual | | 0.79% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,249.04 | | $4.41 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 0.79% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,020.88 | | $3.96 |
R1 | | Actual | | 1.79% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,242.29 | | $9.95 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.79% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,015.92 | | $8.95 |
R2 | | Actual | | 1.29% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,246.09 | | $7.18 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.29% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,018.40 | | $6.46 |
R3 | | Actual | | 1.04% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,247.55 | | $5.80 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.04% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,019.64 | | $5.21 |
R4 | | Actual | | 0.78% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,249.04 | | $4.35 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 0.78% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,020.93 | | $3.91 |
529A | | Actual | | 1.16% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,246.84 | | $6.46 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.16% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,019.04 | | $5.81 |
529B | | Actual | | 1.89% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,242.54 | | $10.51 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.89% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,015.42 | | $9.44 |
529C | | Actual | | 1.89% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,241.69 | | $10.50 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.89% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,015.42 | | $9.44 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid is equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
4
Expense Table – continued
Expense Changes Impacting the Table
Changes to the fund’s fee arrangements occurred during the six month period. Had these fee changes been in effect throughout the entire six month period, the annualized expense ratios would have been 1.04% for Class A shares and 1.15% for Class 529A shares; the actual expenses paid during the period would have been approximately $5.80 for Class A shares and $6.41 for Class 529A shares; and the hypothetical expenses paid during the period would have been approximately $5.21 for Class A shares and $5.76 for Class 529A shares. For further information about the fund’s fee arrangements and changes to those fee arrangements, please see Note 3 in the Notes to Financial Statements.
5
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
7/31/09 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
| | | | | | |
Bonds - 84.9% | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Aerospace - 1.6% | | | | | | |
Bombardier, Inc., 6.3%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 3,710,000 | | $ | 3,431,730 |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Co. LLC, 8.5%, 2015 | | | 4,083,000 | | | 2,378,348 |
TransDigm Group, Inc., 7.75%, 2014 | | | 1,860,000 | | | 1,827,450 |
Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc., 8%, 2011 | | | 6,690,000 | | | 6,322,050 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 13,959,578 |
Airlines - 1.5% | | | | | | |
American Airlines, Inc., 10.375%, 2019 | | $ | 1,655,000 | | $ | 1,667,413 |
AMR Corp., 7.858%, 2011 | | | 4,720,000 | | | 4,389,600 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., 7.339%, 2014 | | | 5,719,000 | | | 4,117,680 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., 6.9%, 2017 | | | 793,322 | | | 594,991 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., 6.748%, 2017 | | | 1,153,273 | | | 888,020 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 7.111%, 2011 | | | 1,740,000 | | | 1,661,700 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 13,319,404 |
Asset Backed & Securitized - 4.0% | | | | | | |
Airlie Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0%, 2011 (a)(z) | | $ | 2,423,653 | | $ | 436,257 |
Anthracite Ltd., CDO, 6%, 2037 (z) | | | 5,148,000 | | | 411,840 |
Babson Ltd., CLO, “D”, FRN, 2.009%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,385,000 | | | 351,788 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., 5.772%, 2017 | | | 7,059,721 | | | 3,902,917 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., 5.39%, 2045 | | | 1,847,377 | | | 1,179,783 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 5.811%, 2017 | | | 1,843,262 | | | 1,118,651 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 5.658%, 2017 | | | 3,130,000 | | | 2,372,451 |
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.699%, 2017 | | | 2,948,120 | | | 532,193 |
Credit Suisse Mortgage Capital Certificate, 5.343%, 2039 | | | 1,967,534 | | | 1,169,314 |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “E2”, 6%, 2045 (z) | | | 1,000,000 | | | 20,000 |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “F”, FRN, 1.804%, 2050 (z) | | | 610,000 | | | 12,200 |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “G”, FRN, 2.004%, 2050 (z) | | | 1,890,000 | | | 37,800 |
CWCapital LLC, 5.223%, 2048 | | | 870,000 | | | 685,272 |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.693%, 2025 (i)(z) | | | 11,282,265 | | | 805,554 |
First Union National Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, 6.75%, 2032 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,198,390 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.44%, 2045 | | | 4,979,655 | | | 3,004,375 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.466%, 2047 | | | 3,723,359 | | | 2,098,696 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.42%, 2049 | | | 4,945,000 | | | 4,229,359 |
6
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Asset Backed & Securitized - continued | | | | | | |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 6.062%, 2051 | | $ | 2,285,000 | | $ | 485,640 |
Lehman Brothers Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 0.827%, 2030 (i) | | | 12,117,060 | | | 298,527 |
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.829%, 2050 | | | 2,285,000 | | | 569,109 |
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, 5.204%, 2049 | | | 5,320,927 | | | 3,133,130 |
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.749%, 2050 | | | 3,115,000 | | | 2,268,349 |
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.749%, 2050 | | | 1,366,000 | | | 721,296 |
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., 1.276%, 2039 (i)(z) | | | 21,149,987 | | | 414,540 |
TIERS Beach Street Synthetic, CLO, FRN, 6.788%, 2011 (z) | | | 2,750,000 | | | 550,000 |
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.753%, 2047 | | | 1,738,692 | | | 251,746 |
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.902%, 2051 | | | 5,334,564 | | | 3,043,666 |
Wachovia Credit, CDO, FRN, 1.958%, 2026 (z) | | | 1,320,000 | | | 52,800 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 35,355,643 |
Automotive - 3.7% | | | | | | |
Accuride Corp., 8.5%, 2015 | | $ | 2,785,000 | | $ | 494,338 |
Allison Transmission, Inc., 11%, 2015 (n) | | | 7,045,000 | | | 6,410,950 |
FCE Bank PLC, 7.125%, 2012 | | EUR | 7,150,000 | | | 9,120,851 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 9.75%, 2010 | | $ | 1,324,000 | | | 1,317,814 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 7.5%, 2012 | | | 1,248,000 | | | 1,151,853 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 12%, 2015 | | | 7,778,000 | | | 7,929,391 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 8%, 2016 | | | 1,260,000 | | | 1,129,366 |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 9%, 2015 | | | 3,425,000 | | | 3,476,375 |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 10.5%, 2016 | | | 1,985,000 | | | 2,128,913 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 33,159,851 |
Broadcasting - 3.5% | | | | | | |
Allbritton Communications Co., 7.75%, 2012 | | $ | 6,575,000 | | $ | 5,457,250 |
Bonten Media Acquisition Co., 9%, 2015 (p)(z) | | | 4,635,475 | | | 1,217,585 |
Canwest Mediaworks, Inc., 9.25%, 2015 (a)(n) | | | 2,890,000 | | | 375,700 |
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., 10.75%, 2016 | | | 1,385,000 | | | 418,963 |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings Ltd., 9.5%, 2016 | | | 6,140,000 | | | 6,354,900 |
Lamar Media Corp., 6.625%, 2015 | | | 3,830,000 | | | 3,370,400 |
Lamar Media Corp., “C”, 6.625%, 2015 | | | 2,950,000 | | | 2,537,000 |
LBI Media, Inc., 8.5%, 2017 (z) | | | 1,450,000 | | | 761,250 |
LIN TV Corp., 6.5%, 2013 | | | 4,330,000 | | | 3,269,150 |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 (p)(z) | | | 5,171,250 | | | 1,078,780 |
Newport Television LLC, 13%, 2017 (n)(p) | | | 4,895,000 | | | 619,353 |
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., 0.5%, 2014 (n)(p) | | | 4,016,798 | | | 1,404,875 |
7
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Broadcasting - continued | | | | | | |
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., 7%, 2014 | | $ | 1,328,000 | | $ | 519,580 |
Univision Communications, Inc., 12%, 2014 (n) | | | 455,000 | | | 484,575 |
Univision Communications, Inc., 9.75%, 2015 (n)(p) | | | 5,735,000 | | | 3,579,596 |
Young Broadcasting, Inc., 8.75%, 2014 (d) | | | 1,640,000 | | | 1,640 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 31,450,597 |
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.6% | | | | | | |
Janus Capital Group, Inc., 6.95%, 2017 | | $ | 4,410,000 | | $ | 3,940,220 |
Nuveen Investments, Inc., 10.5%, 2015 (n) | | | 1,875,000 | | | 1,331,250 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 5,271,470 |
Building - 1.7% | | | | | | |
Associated Materials, Inc., 9.75%, 2012 | | $ | 1,860,000 | | $ | 1,601,925 |
Associated Materials, Inc., 11.25%, 2014 | | | 2,360,000 | | | 1,003,000 |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 7.75%, 2014 | | | 3,275,000 | | | 3,017,094 |
Nortek, Inc., 10%, 2013 | | | 3,815,000 | | | 3,366,738 |
Nortek, Inc., 8.5%, 2014 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 720,000 |
Owens Corning, 9%, 2019 | | | 2,825,000 | | | 2,926,906 |
Ply Gem Industries, Inc., 11.75%, 2013 | | | 2,660,000 | | | 2,008,300 |
USG Corp., 9.75%, 2014 (z) | | | 555,000 | | | 566,100 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 15,210,063 |
Business Services - 2.2% | | | | | | |
First Data Corp., 9.875%, 2015 | | $ | 7,830,000 | | $ | 6,606,563 |
Iron Mountain, Inc., 6.625%, 2016 | | | 3,045,000 | | | 2,812,819 |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., 9.125%, 2013 | | | 3,970,000 | | | 4,049,400 |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., 10.25%, 2015 | | | 5,078,000 | | | 5,204,950 |
Terremark Worldwide, Inc., 12%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,000,000 | | | 1,010,000 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 19,683,732 |
Cable TV - 4.1% | | | | | | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 8.75%, 2013 | | $ | 6,625,000 | | $ | 6,608,438 |
Charter Communications Holdings LLC, 8.375%, 2014 (n) | | | 2,255,000 | | | 2,249,363 |
Charter Communications Holdings LLC, 10.875%, 2014 (n) | | | 2,725,000 | | | 2,943,000 |
CSC Holdings, Inc., 6.75%, 2012 | | | 3,550,000 | | | 3,532,250 |
CSC Holdings, Inc., 8.5%, 2014 (n) | | | 1,445,000 | | | 1,488,350 |
DirectTV Holdings LLC, 7.625%, 2016 | | | 10,330,000 | | | 10,459,125 |
Mediacom LLC, 9.5%, 2013 | | | 1,620,000 | | | 1,611,900 |
Videotron LTEE, 6.875%, 2014 | | | 1,045,000 | | | 1,024,100 |
Virgin Media Finance PLC, 9.5%, 2016 | | | 1,900,000 | | | 1,947,500 |
Virgin Media, Inc., 9.125%, 2016 | | | 4,528,000 | | | 4,573,280 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 36,437,306 |
8
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Chemicals - 2.1% | | | | | | |
Dow Chemical Co., 8.55%, 2019 | | $ | 2,905,000 | | $ | 3,187,061 |
Innophos Holdings, Inc., 8.875%, 2014 | | | 4,315,000 | | | 4,099,250 |
KI Holdings, Inc., 0% to 2009, 9.875% to 2014 | | | 5,560,000 | | | 5,143,000 |
Momentive Performance Materials, Inc., 12.5%, 2014 (n) | | | 2,690,000 | | | 2,636,200 |
Momentive Performance Materials, Inc., 11.5%, 2016 | | | 2,930,000 | | | 1,465,000 |
Nalco Co., 7.75%, 2011 | | | 16,000 | | | 16,080 |
Nalco Co., 8.875%, 2013 | | | 2,090,000 | | | 2,163,150 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 18,709,741 |
Construction - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Lennar Corp., 12.25%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 1,285,000 | | $ | 1,439,200 |
| | |
Consumer Products - 0.6% | | | | | | |
ACCO Brands Corp., 7.625%, 2015 | | $ | 1,275,000 | | $ | 924,375 |
Jarden Corp., 7.5%, 2017 | | | 3,450,000 | | | 3,312,000 |
Visant Holding Corp., 8.75%, 2013 | | | 845,000 | | | 849,225 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 5,085,600 |
Consumer Services - 2.7% | | | | | | |
Corrections Corp. of America, 6.25%, 2013 | | $ | 2,330,000 | | $ | 2,283,400 |
Corrections Corp. of America, 7.75%, 2017 | | | 1,400,000 | | | 1,403,500 |
GEO Group, Inc., 8.25%, 2013 | | | 3,320,000 | | | 3,270,200 |
KAR Holdings, Inc., 10%, 2015 | | | 4,175,000 | | | 3,674,000 |
KAR Holdings, Inc., FRN, 4.483%, 2014 | | | 1,660,000 | | | 1,344,600 |
Service Corp. International, 7.375%, 2014 | | | 2,670,000 | | | 2,596,575 |
Service Corp. International, 7%, 2017 | | | 6,380,000 | | | 5,933,400 |
Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc., 10.75%, 2016 | | | 4,015,000 | | | 3,733,950 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 24,239,625 |
Containers - 1.4% | | | | | | |
Crown Americas LLC, 7.625%, 2013 | | $ | 3,075,000 | | $ | 3,136,500 |
Graham Packaging Holdings Co., 9.875%, 2014 | | | 4,840,000 | | | 4,634,300 |
Greif, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | | | 3,415,000 | | | 3,218,638 |
Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 8.25%, 2013 | | | 1,830,000 | | | 1,871,175 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 12,860,613 |
Defense Electronics - 0.7% | | | | | | |
L-3 Communications Corp., 6.125%, 2014 | | $ | 4,685,000 | | $ | 4,532,738 |
L-3 Communications Corp., 5.875%, 2015 | | | 1,720,000 | | | 1,629,700 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 6,162,438 |
Electronics - 0.9% | | | | | | |
Avago Technologies Ltd., 11.875%, 2015 | | $ | 2,260,000 | | $ | 2,350,400 |
9
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Electronics - continued | | | | | | |
Flextronics International Ltd., 6.25%, 2014 | | $ | 925,000 | | $ | 869,500 |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 8.875%, 2014 | | | 3,285,000 | | | 2,200,950 |
Jabil Circuit, Inc., 7.75%, 2016 | | | 945,000 | | | 908,551 |
Spansion, Inc., 11.25%, 2016 (d)(n) | | | 2,065,000 | | | 1,373,225 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 7,702,626 |
Emerging Market Sovereign - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Republic of Argentina, 0%, 2009 | | $ | 445,055 | | $ | 441,611 |
Republic of Argentina, FRN, 1.683%, 2012 | | | 1,291,763 | | | 895,555 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 1,337,166 |
Energy - Independent - 7.1% | | | | | | |
Chaparral Energy, Inc., 8.875%, 2017 | | $ | 3,465,000 | | $ | 2,148,300 |
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 7%, 2014 | | | 1,245,000 | | | 1,204,538 |
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 9.5%, 2015 | | | 910,000 | | | 965,738 |
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 6.375%, 2015 | | | 6,470,000 | | | 6,033,275 |
Forest Oil Corp., 8.5%, 2014 (n) | | | 595,000 | | | 603,925 |
Forest Oil Corp., 7.25%, 2019 | | | 3,460,000 | | | 3,291,325 |
Hilcorp Energy I LP, 9%, 2016 (n) | | | 5,000,000 | | | 4,600,000 |
Mariner Energy, Inc., 8%, 2017 | | | 4,995,000 | | | 4,345,650 |
McMoRan Exploration Co., 11.875%, 2014 | | | 2,675,000 | | | 2,454,313 |
Newfield Exploration Co., 6.625%, 2014 | | | 2,080,000 | | | 2,007,200 |
Newfield Exploration Co., 6.625%, 2016 | | | 1,070,000 | | | 1,032,550 |
OPTI Canada, Inc., 8.25%, 2014 | | | 4,955,000 | | | 3,270,300 |
Penn Virginia Corp., 10.375%, 2016 | | | 5,160,000 | | | 5,501,850 |
Petrohawk Energy Corp., 10.5%, 2014 (n) | | | 3,080,000 | | | 3,295,600 |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 7%, 2017 | | | 6,195,000 | | | 5,869,763 |
Quicksilver Resources, Inc., 8.25%, 2015 | | | 3,065,000 | | | 2,942,400 |
Quicksilver Resources, Inc., 7.125%, 2016 | | | 3,840,000 | | | 3,225,600 |
Range Resources Corp., 8%, 2019 | | | 4,375,000 | | | 4,451,563 |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., 9.875%, 2016 (n) | | | 895,000 | | | 903,950 |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., 8%, 2018 (n) | | | 5,195,000 | | | 4,727,450 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 62,875,290 |
Entertainment - 0.8% | | | | | | |
AMC Entertainment, Inc., 11%, 2016 | | $ | 2,935,000 | | $ | 2,964,350 |
AMC Entertainment, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,575,000 | | | 2,536,375 |
Cinemark USA, Inc., 8.625%, 2019 (n) | | | 1,345,000 | | | 1,392,075 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 6,892,800 |
Financial Institutions - 2.1% | | | | | | |
GMAC LLC, 6.875%, 2011 (n) | | $ | 7,473,000 | | $ | 6,893,843 |
GMAC LLC, 7%, 2012 (n) | | | 1,745,000 | | | 1,579,225 |
10
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Financial Institutions - continued | | | | | | |
GMAC LLC, 6.75%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 6,260,000 | | $ | 5,383,600 |
GMAC LLC, 8%, 2031 (n) | | | 5,208,000 | | | 3,984,120 |
International Lease Finance Corp., 5.625%, 2013 | | | 1,395,000 | | | 973,526 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 18,814,314 |
Food & Beverages - 1.8% | | | | | | |
ARAMARK Corp., 8.5%, 2015 | | $ | 2,151,000 | | $ | 2,167,133 |
B&G Foods, Inc., 8%, 2011 | | | 3,570,000 | | | 3,587,850 |
Dean Foods Co., 7%, 2016 | | | 3,190,000 | | | 3,006,575 |
Del Monte Corp., 6.75%, 2015 | | | 3,920,000 | | | 3,812,200 |
Michael Foods, Inc., 8%, 2013 | | | 3,105,000 | | | 3,112,763 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 15,686,521 |
Forest & Paper Products - 1.9% | | | | | | |
Buckeye Technologies, Inc., 8.5%, 2013 | | $ | 6,010,000 | | $ | 5,829,700 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 7.125%, 2017 (n) | | | 3,480,000 | | | 3,393,000 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 8%, 2024 | | | 1,490,000 | | | 1,329,825 |
Graphic Packaging International Corp., 9.5%, 2013 | | | 2,380,000 | | | 2,371,075 |
Jefferson Smurfit Corp., 8.25%, 2012 (d) | | | 1,800,000 | | | 909,000 |
JSG Funding PLC, 7.75%, 2015 | | | 525,000 | | | 427,875 |
Millar Western Forest Products Ltd., 7.75%, 2013 | | | 4,885,000 | | | 2,393,650 |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., 8%, 2017 (d) | | | 965,000 | | | 484,913 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 17,139,038 |
Gaming & Lodging - 5.5% | | | | | | |
Ameristar Casinos, Inc., 9.25%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 1,380,000 | | $ | 1,421,400 |
Boyd Gaming Corp., 6.75%, 2014 | | | 5,335,000 | | | 4,761,488 |
Firekeepers Development Authority, 13.875%, 2015 (n) | | | 1,450,000 | | | 1,450,000 |
Fontainebleau Las Vegas Holdings LLC, 10.25%, 2015 (d)(n) | | | 3,300,000 | | | 99,000 |
Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc., 11.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,715,000 | | | 2,748,938 |
Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc., 10%, 2018 (n) | | | 8,161,000 | | | 5,712,700 |
Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc., 10%, 2018 (n) | | | 571,000 | | | 399,700 |
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., 7.125%, 2013 | | | 1,155,000 | | | 1,120,350 |
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., 6.75%, 2016 | | | 2,170,000 | | | 2,012,675 |
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., 9%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,455,000 | | | 2,473,413 |
MGM Mirage, 6.75%, 2013 | | | 4,555,000 | | | 3,473,188 |
MGM Mirage, 5.875%, 2014 | | | 1,030,000 | | | 741,600 |
MGM Mirage, 10.375%, 2014 (n) | | | 520,000 | | | 557,700 |
MGM Mirage, 7.5%, 2016 | | | 2,735,000 | | | 1,996,550 |
MGM Mirage, 11.125%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,280,000 | | | 1,408,000 |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 7.5%, 2015 | | | 7,965,000 | | | 7,068,938 |
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 7%, 2013 | | | 2,105,000 | | | 1,883,975 |
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 11.875%, 2015 | | | 2,335,000 | | | 2,405,050 |
11
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Gaming & Lodging - continued | | | | | | |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., 7.875%, 2012 | | $ | 675,000 | | $ | 675,000 |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., 6.75%, 2018 | | | 1,565,000 | | | 1,408,500 |
Station Casinos, Inc., 6%, 2012 (d) | | | 4,027,000 | | | 1,208,100 |
Station Casinos, Inc., 6.5%, 2014 (d) | | | 6,495,000 | | | 97,425 |
Station Casinos, Inc., 6.875%, 2016 (d) | | | 7,690,000 | | | 115,350 |
Station Casinos, Inc., 7.75%, 2016 (d) | | | 1,413,000 | | | 423,900 |
Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, Inc., 8.5%, 2015 (d) | | | 1,890,000 | | | 245,700 |
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 6%, 2016 | | | 3,355,000 | | | 2,844,245 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 48,752,885 |
Industrial - 0.9% | | | | | | |
Baldor Electric Co., 8.625%, 2017 | | $ | 2,775,000 | | $ | 2,781,938 |
JohnsonDiversey, Inc., 9.625%, 2012 | | EUR | 1,405,000 | | | 1,832,330 |
JohnsonDiversey, Inc., “B”, 9.625%, 2012 | | $ | 3,065,000 | | | 3,110,975 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 7,725,243 |
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 0.3% | | | | | | |
USI Holdings Corp., 9.75%, 2015 (z) | | $ | 3,165,000 | | $ | 2,326,275 |
| | |
Machinery & Tools - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Case New Holland, Inc., 7.125%, 2014 | | $ | 1,975,000 | | $ | 1,856,500 |
| | |
Major Banks - 1.4% | | | | | | |
Bank of America Corp., 8% to 2018, FRN to 2059 | | $ | 7,780,000 | | $ | 6,654,156 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 7.9% to 2018, FRN to 2049 | | | 6,505,000 | | | 6,183,068 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 12,837,224 |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 6.3% | | | | | | |
Biomet, Inc., 10%, 2017 | | $ | 2,740,000 | | $ | 2,966,050 |
Biomet, Inc., 11.625%, 2017 | | | 2,645,000 | | | 2,869,825 |
Community Health Systems, Inc., 8.875%, 2015 | | | 7,585,000 | | | 7,812,550 |
Cooper Cos., Inc., 7.125%, 2015 | | | 2,045,000 | | | 1,922,300 |
DaVita, Inc., 6.625%, 2013 | | | 1,454,000 | | | 1,428,555 |
DaVita, Inc., 7.25%, 2015 | | | 3,720,000 | | | 3,645,600 |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, 9%, 2015 (n) | | | 2,540,000 | | | 2,743,200 |
HCA, Inc., 6.375%, 2015 | | | 4,325,000 | | | 3,827,625 |
HCA, Inc., 9.25%, 2016 | | | 11,595,000 | | | 12,087,788 |
HCA, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,055,000 | | | 2,106,375 |
Psychiatric Solutions, Inc., 7.75%, 2015 (n) | | | 950,000 | | | 876,375 |
Psychiatric Solutions, Inc., 7.75%, 2015 | | | 3,185,000 | | | 3,017,788 |
U.S. Oncology, Inc., 10.75%, 2014 | | | 3,585,000 | | | 3,549,150 |
Universal Hospital Services, Inc., 8.5%, 2015 (p) | | | 3,330,000 | | | 3,230,100 |
Universal Hospital Services, Inc., FRN, 4.635%, 2015 | | | 1,015,000 | | | 852,600 |
12
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - continued | | | | | | |
Vwr Funding, Inc., 11.25%, 2015 (p) | | $ | 3,520,000 | | $ | 3,075,600 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 56,011,481 |
Metals & Mining - 2.8% | | | | | | |
Arch Coal, Inc., 8.75%, 2016 (z) | | $ | 1,715,000 | | $ | 1,732,150 |
Arch Western Finance LLC, 6.75%, 2013 | | | 3,570,000 | | | 3,462,900 |
FMG Finance Ltd., 10.625%, 2016 (n) | | | 4,810,000 | | | 4,966,325 |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 8.375%, 2017 | | | 8,395,000 | | | 8,898,700 |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., FRN, 4.995%, 2015 | | | 1,088,000 | | | 1,046,504 |
Peabody Energy Corp., 5.875%, 2016 | | | 3,065,000 | | | 2,850,450 |
Peabody Energy Corp., 7.375%, 2016 | | | 2,185,000 | | | 2,195,925 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 25,152,954 |
Natural Gas - Distribution - 0.8% | | | | | | |
AmeriGas Partners LP, 7.125%, 2016 | | $ | 4,165,000 | | $ | 4,040,050 |
Inergy LP, 6.875%, 2014 | | | 3,625,000 | | | 3,425,625 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 7,465,675 |
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 2.3% | | | | | | |
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP, 8.125%, 2015 | | $ | 3,565,000 | | $ | 2,923,300 |
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP, 8.75%, 2018 | | | 2,775,000 | | | 2,220,000 |
Deutsche Bank (El Paso Performance-Linked Trust, CLN), 7.75%, 2011 (n) | | | 3,905,000 | | | 3,851,224 |
El Paso Corp., 8.25%, 2016 | | | 2,575,000 | | | 2,626,500 |
El Paso Corp., 7.25%, 2018 | | | 2,840,000 | | | 2,758,628 |
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 6.875%, 2014 (n) | | | 2,520,000 | | | 2,217,600 |
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 8.75%, 2018 | | | 815,000 | | | 757,950 |
Williams Partners LP, 7.25%, 2017 | | | 2,875,000 | | | 2,817,500 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 20,172,702 |
Network & Telecom - 3.3% | | | | | | |
Cincinnati Bell, Inc., 8.375%, 2014 | | $ | 6,315,000 | | $ | 6,251,850 |
Citizens Communications Co., 9.25%, 2011 | | | 3,871,000 | | | 3,991,969 |
Nordic Telephone Co. Holdings, 8.875%, 2016 (n) | | | 3,965,000 | | | 4,024,475 |
Qwest Communications International, Inc., 7.25%, 2011 | | | 2,165,000 | | | 2,143,350 |
Qwest Corp., 7.875%, 2011 | | | 1,705,000 | | | 1,739,100 |
Qwest Corp., 8.875%, 2012 | | | 5,210,000 | | | 5,405,375 |
Qwest Corp., 8.375%, 2016 (n) | | | 1,220,000 | | | 1,250,500 |
Windstream Corp., 8.625%, 2016 | | | 4,220,000 | | | 4,283,300 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 29,089,919 |
13
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Precious Metals & Minerals - 0.8% | | | | | | |
Teck Resources Ltd., 9.75%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 1,665,000 | | $ | 1,852,313 |
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.75%, 2019 (n) | | | 4,485,000 | | | 5,219,419 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 7,071,732 |
Printing & Publishing - 1.0% | | | | | | |
American Media Operations, Inc., 9%, 2013 (p)(z) | | $ | 259,617 | | $ | 124,032 |
American Media Operations, Inc., 14%, 2013 (p)(z) | | | 2,710,436 | | | 1,259,525 |
Dex Media West LLC, 9.875%, 2013 (d) | | | 4,100,000 | | | 758,500 |
Idearc, Inc., 8%, 2016 (d) | | | 3,584,000 | | | 156,800 |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 10%, 2014 | | | 3,550,000 | | | 3,567,750 |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 11.5%, 2016 | | | 2,020,000 | | | 2,115,950 |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 0% to 2011, 12.5% to 2016 | | | 421,000 | | | 306,278 |
Quebecor World, Inc., 6.125%, 2013 (d) | | | 2,190,000 | | | 186,150 |
Tribune Co., 5.25%, 2015 (d) | | | 2,550,000 | | | 143,438 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 8,618,423 |
Railroad & Shipping - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Kansas City Southern Railway, 8%, 2015 | | $ | 3,280,000 | | $ | 3,181,600 |
| | |
Real Estate - 0.1% | | | | | | |
CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., 11.625%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 1,020,000 | | $ | 1,025,100 |
| | |
Retailers - 2.7% | | | | | | |
Couche-Tard, Inc., 7.5%, 2013 | | $ | 705,000 | | $ | 704,119 |
Dollar General Corp., 11.875%, 2017 (p) | | | 1,920,000 | | | 2,150,400 |
Limited Brands, Inc., 5.25%, 2014 | | | 2,480,000 | | | 2,136,141 |
Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc., 5.35%, 2012 | | | 1,135,000 | | | 1,113,148 |
Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc., 5.75%, 2014 | | | 4,065,000 | | | 3,756,430 |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., 10.375%, 2015 | | | 4,005,000 | | | 2,883,600 |
Rite Aid Corp., 9.75%, 2016 (n) | | | 2,045,000 | | | 2,157,475 |
Rite Aid Corp., 7.5%, 2017 | | | 2,585,000 | | | 2,210,175 |
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., 10.5%, 2016 | | | 2,945,000 | | | 3,033,350 |
Toys “R” Us, Inc., 10.75%, 2017 (z) | | | 4,085,000 | | | 4,187,125 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 24,331,963 |
Specialty Chemicals - 0.5% | | | | | | |
Ashland, Inc., 9.125%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 4,010,000 | | $ | 4,230,550 |
| | |
Specialty Stores - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Michaels Stores, Inc., 10%, 2014 | | $ | 505,000 | | $ | 474,700 |
Payless ShoeSource, Inc., 8.25%, 2013 | | | 3,290,000 | | | 3,191,300 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,666,000 |
14
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Supermarkets - 0.2% | | | | | | |
SUPERVALU, Inc., 8%, 2016 | | $ | 1,750,000 | | $ | 1,736,875 |
| | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - 3.2% | | | | | | |
Cricket Communications, Inc., 7.75%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 2,040,000 | | $ | 2,029,800 |
Crown Castle International Corp., 9%, 2015 | | | 2,705,000 | | | 2,857,156 |
Crown Castle International Corp., 7.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,265,000 | | | 1,290,300 |
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 9.25%, 2014 | | | 4,030,000 | | | 4,171,050 |
Nextel Communications, Inc., 6.875%, 2013 | | | 4,335,000 | | | 3,955,688 |
SBA Telecommunications, Inc., 8%, 2016 (z) | | | 935,000 | | | 944,350 |
SBA Telecommunications, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 (z) | | | 795,000 | | | 806,925 |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 8.375%, 2012 | | | 3,930,000 | | | 3,979,125 |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 8.75%, 2032 | | | 4,410,000 | | | 3,798,113 |
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 10.75%, 2015 (z) | | | 4,720,000 | | | 5,003,200 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 28,835,707 |
Telephone Services - 0.3% | | | | | | |
Frontier Communications Corp., 8.25%, 2014 | | $ | 2,345,000 | | $ | 2,374,313 |
| | |
Tobacco - 0.6% | | | | | | |
Alliance One International, Inc., 10%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 2,830,000 | | $ | 2,787,550 |
Altria Group, Inc., 9.7%, 2018 | | | 1,995,000 | | | 2,425,944 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 5,213,494 |
Transportation - Services - 0.5% | | | | | | |
Commercial Barge Line Co., 12.5%, 2017 (z) | | $ | 1,645,000 | | $ | 1,575,088 |
Hertz Corp., 8.875%, 2014 | | | 3,305,000 | | | 3,181,063 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 4,756,151 |
Utilities - Electric Power - 5.0% | | | | | | |
AES Corp., 8%, 2017 | | $ | 6,450,000 | | $ | 6,321,000 |
Calpine Corp., 8%, 2016 (n) | | | 2,690,000 | | | 2,703,450 |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc., 7.5%, 2015 | | | 3,900,000 | | | 3,412,500 |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc., 7.75%, 2019 | | | 3,130,000 | | | 2,492,263 |
Edison Mission Energy, 7%, 2017 | | | 4,730,000 | | | 3,766,263 |
Mirant Americas Generation LLC, 8.3%, 2011 | | | 2,900,000 | | | 2,947,125 |
Mirant North America LLC, 7.375%, 2013 | | | 1,830,000 | | | 1,807,125 |
NRG Energy, Inc., 7.375%, 2016 | | | 10,595,000 | | | 10,250,663 |
RRI Energy, Inc., 7.875%, 2017 | | | 1,496,000 | | | 1,380,060 |
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings LLC, 10.25%, 2015 | | | 11,850,000 | | | 9,302,250 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 44,382,699 |
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $826,830,786) | | | | | $ | 753,608,081 |
15
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - 8.4% | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Aerospace - 0.6% | | | | | | |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Co., Letter of Credit, 2.59%, 2014 | | $ | 330,544 | | $ | 223,324 |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Co., Term Loan B, 2.38%, 2014 | | | 7,171,096 | | | 4,844,972 |
Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc., Term Loan, 2.81%, 2011 | | | 390,256 | | | 380,500 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 5,448,796 |
Airlines - 0.0% | | | | | | |
United Airlines, Inc., Term Loan B, 2.31%, 2014 | | $ | 3,535 | | $ | 1,986 |
| | |
Automotive - 1.1% | | | | | | |
Accuride Corp., Term Loan B, 3.42%, 2012 | | $ | 450,714 | | $ | 412,403 |
Federal Mogul Corp., Term Loan B, 2.24%, 2014 | | | 4,207,555 | | | 3,171,444 |
Ford Motor Co., Term Loan B, 3.49%, 2013 | | | 7,642,813 | | | 6,479,409 |
Mark IV Industries, Inc., Second Lien Term Loan, 9.66%, 2011 (d) | | | 3,435,511 | | | 36,502 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 10,099,758 |
Broadcasting - 0.6% | | | | | | |
Gray Television, Inc., Term Loan B, 3.81%, 2014 | | $ | 1,688,863 | | $ | 1,060,817 |
Local TV LLC, Term Loan B, 2.29%, 2013 | | | 1,107,652 | | | 664,591 |
Univision Communications Inc., Term Loan, 2.56%, 2014 | | | 471,076 | | | 378,823 |
Young Broadcasting, Inc., Term Loan B, 4.75%, 2012 (d) | | | 4,655,104 | | | 2,254,402 |
Young Broadcasting, Inc., Term Loan B-1, 4.75%, 2012 (d) | | | 1,350,054 | | | 653,812 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 5,012,445 |
Building - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Building Materials Corp., Term Loan B, 3.06%, 2014 | | $ | 1,394,890 | | $ | 1,247,845 |
| | |
Business Services - 0.7% | | | | | | |
First Data Corp., Term Loan B-1, 3.03%, 2014 | | $ | 5,519,373 | | $ | 4,636,274 |
First Data Term Loan B-2, 3.07%, 2014 | | | 343,396 | | | 289,418 |
Sungard Data Systems, Inc., Incremental Term Loan, 6.75%, 2014 | | | 353,321 | | | 352,060 |
Sungard Data Systems, Inc., Term Loan A, 2.45%, 2014 | | | 41,281 | | | 38,990 |
Sunguard Data Systems, Inc., Term Loan B, 4.26%, 2013 | | | 883,296 | | | 843,989 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 6,160,731 |
Cable TV - 0.5% | | | | | | |
Charter Communications Operating LLC, Term Loan B, 9.25%, 2014 | | $ | 680,077 | | $ | 675,657 |
Charter Communications Operating LLC, Term Loan B, 6.25%, 2014 | | | 2,895,363 | | | 2,702,097 |
CSC Holdings, Inc., Term Loan B, 2.03%, 2013 | | | 1,193,887 | | | 1,151,802 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 4,529,556 |
16
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - continued | | | | | | |
Consumer Services - 0.1% | | | | | | |
KAR Holdings, Inc., Term Loan, 2.54%, 2013 | | $ | 406,727 | | $ | 377,239 |
Ticketmaster Term Loan B, 3.6%, 2014 | | | 569,250 | | | 546,480 |
Weight Watchers International, Inc., Term Loan B, 2.12%, 2014 | | | 432,515 | | | 410,619 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 1,334,338 |
Electronics - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Term Loan B, 2.05%, 2013 | | $ | 1,865,755 | | $ | 1,371,996 |
| | |
Entertainment - 0.1% | | | | | | |
AMC Entertainment, Inc. Term Loan, 1.78%, 2013 | | $ | 888,656 | | $ | 840,669 |
Cinemark Usa, Inc., Term Loan, 2.23%, 2013 | | | 498,718 | | | 476,146 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 1,316,815 |
Food & Beverages - 0.1% | | | | | | |
ARAMARK Corp., Letter of Credit, 0.31%, 2014 | | $ | 77,047 | | $ | 73,002 |
ARAMARK Corp., Term Loan B, 2.47%, 2014 | | | 1,212,775 | | | 1,149,105 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 1,222,107 |
Forest & Paper Products - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Georgia-Pacific Corp., Term Loan B, 2.59%, 2049 | | $ | 772,076 | | $ | 742,641 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp., Term Loan C, 3.76%, 2014 | | | 425,081 | | | 414,188 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 1,156,829 |
Gaming & Lodging - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Green Valley Ranch Gaming LLC, Seond Lien Term Loan, 3.87%, 2014 | | $ | 4,910,923 | | $ | 834,857 |
Las Vegas Sands Corp., Term Loan B, 2.06%, 2014 | | | 556,767 | | | 437,897 |
Las Vegas Sands Corp., Term Loan B-1, 2.06%, 2014 | | | 140,260 | | | 110,315 |
MGM Mirage, Term Loan B, 2011 (o) | | | 2,509,670 | | | 2,061,418 |
Venetian Macau Ltd., Term Loan, 2.85%, 2012 | | | 498,750 | | | 459,265 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,903,752 |
Industrial - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Oshkosh Truck Corp. Term Loan B, 6.62%, 2013 | | $ | 643,913 | | $ | 635,748 |
| | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 0.3% | | | | | | |
Biomet, Inc. Term Loan B, 3.57%, 2015 | | $ | 952,589 | | $ | 900,296 |
Community Health Systems, Inc., Term Loan, 2.87%, 2014 | | | 1,693,684 | | | 1,588,535 |
Community Health Systems, Inc., Term Loan B, 2.56%, 2014 | | | 86,404 | | | 81,040 |
Psychiatric Solutions, Term Loan B, 2.05%, 2012 | | | 480,405 | | | 453,982 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,023,853 |
17
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - continued | | | | | | |
Pharmaceuticals - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Mylan Laboratories, Inc., Term Loan B, 3.81%, 2014 | | $ | 770,906 | | $ | 747,644 |
| | |
Printing & Publishing - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Ascend Media LLC, Term Loan, 10.25%, 2012 | | $ | 481,013 | | $ | 45,648 |
Nielsen Finance LLC, Term Loan, 2.3%, 2013 | | | 1,025,225 | | | 951,217 |
Tribune Co., Term Loan B, 6.5%, 2014 (d) | | | 5,696,035 | | | 2,153,813 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,150,678 |
Real Estate - 0.1% | | | | | | |
CB Richard Ellis Services, Term Loan B, 6%, 2013 | | $ | 719,726 | | $ | 681,341 |
| | |
Retailers - 0.3% | | | | | | |
General Nutrition Centers, Inc., Term Loan B, 2.73%, 2014 | | $ | 340,242 | | $ | 308,344 |
Rite Aid Corp., Term Loan, 9.5%, 2015 | | | 1,000,000 | | | 1,020,000 |
Toys “R” Us, Term Loan, 4.53%, 2012 | | | 1,462,566 | | | 1,404,586 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 2,732,930 |
Specialty Chemicals - 0.4% | | | | | | |
LyondellBasell Dutch Tranche Revolving Credit Loan, 3.78%, 2014 (o) | | $ | 78,896 | | $ | 34,024 |
LyondellBasell Dutch Tranche Term Loan A, 3.78%, 2014 (o) | | | 183,279 | | | 79,039 |
LyondellBasell German Term Loan B-1, 4.03%, 2014 (o) | | | 226,493 | | | 97,675 |
LyondellBasell German Term Loan B-2, 4.03%, 2014 (o) | | | 226,519 | | | 97,686 |
LyondellBasell German Term Loan B-3, 4.03%, 2014 (o) | | | 226,519 | | | 97,686 |
LyondellBasell Second Priority DIP Term Loan, 5.81%, 2014 | | | 568,104 | | | 476,734 |
LyondellBasell Super Priority DIP Term Loan, 9%, 2009 (q) | | | 568,664 | | | 587,383 |
LyondellBasell Term Loan B-1, 7%, 2014 (o) | | | 983,315 | | | 424,055 |
LyondellBasell Term Loan B-2, 7%, 2014 (o) | | | 983,306 | | | 424,051 |
LyondellBasell Term Loan B-3, 7%, 2014 (o) | | | 983,306 | | | 424,051 |
LyondellBasell U.S. Tranche Revolving Credit Loan, 3.78%, 2014 (o) | | | 295,891 | | | 127,603 |
LyondellBasell U.S. Tranche Term Loan A, 3.78%, 2014 (o) | | | 563,673 | | | 243,084 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,113,071 |
Specialty Stores - 0.5% | | | | | | |
Michaels Stores, Inc., Term Loan B, 2.56%, 2013 | | $ | 4,879,844 | | $ | 4,003,214 |
| | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Metropcs Wireless, Inc., Term Loan B, 3.06%, 2013 | | $ | 648,329 | | $ | 619,154 |
| | |
Utilities - Electric Power - 1.5% | | | | | | |
Calpine Corp., Term Loan, 3.47%, 2014 | | $ | 4,575,425 | | $ | 4,197,952 |
NRG Energy, Inc., Letter of Credit, 2.34%, 2013 | | | 317,682 | | | 301,004 |
18
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - continued | | | | | | |
Utilities - Electric Power - continued | | | | | | |
NRG Energy, Inc., Term Loan B, 2%, 2013 | | $ | 1,051,667 | | $ | 996,455 |
TXU Corp. Term Loan B-3, 3.8%, 2014 | | | 9,213,448 | | | 7,067,001 |
TXU Corp., Term Loan B, 2014, 3.8%, 2014 | | | 424,118 | | | 326,748 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 12,889,160 |
Total Floating Rate Loans (Identified Cost, $90,712,752) | | | | | $ | 74,403,747 |
| | |
Common Stocks - 0.8% | | | | | | |
Automotive - 0.0% | | | | | | |
Oxford Automotive, Inc. (a) | | | 1,087 | | $ | 0 |
| | |
Cable TV - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Cablevision Systems Corp., “A” | | | 41,600 | | $ | 851,552 |
Comcast Corp., “A” | | | 153,900 | | | 2,286,954 |
Time Warner Cable, Inc. | | | 19,833 | | | 655,679 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,794,185 |
Energy - Integrated - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Chevron Corp. | | | 9,500 | | $ | 659,965 |
| | |
Gaming & Lodging - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (a) | | | 107,700 | | $ | 1,080,231 |
| | |
Printing & Publishing - 0.0% | | | | | | |
American Media, Inc. (a) | | | 49,687 | | $ | 66,581 |
Golden Books Family Entertainment, Inc. (a) | | | 206,408 | | | 0 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 66,581 |
Telephone Services - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Windstream Corp. | | | 151,600 | | $ | 1,329,532 |
Total Common Stocks (Identified Cost, $11,238,012) | | | | | $ | 6,930,494 |
| | |
Preferred Stocks - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Broadcasting - 0.0% | | | | | | |
Spanish Broadcasting Systems, Inc., “B”, 10.75% | | | 2,089 | | $ | 54,869 |
| | |
Financial Institutions - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Preferred Blocker, Inc., 7% (z) | | | 1,826 | | $ | 840,816 |
| | |
Major Banks - 0.3% | | | | | | |
Bank of America Corp. , 8.625% | | | 116,650 | | $ | 2,650,288 |
Total Preferred Stocks (Identified Cost, $6,323,026) | | | | | $ | 3,545,973 |
19
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants - 0.0% | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Strike Price | | First Exercise | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Construction - 0.0% | | | | | | | | | | |
Building Materials Holding Corp. (1 share for 1 warrant) (Identified Cost, $0) (a) | | $ | 0.47 | | 10/24/08 | | 4,362 | | $ | 133 |
| | | | | |
| | |
Money Market Funds (v) - 4.7% | | | | | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.21%, at Cost and Net Asset Value | | 41,763,058 | | $ | 41,763,058 |
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $976,867,634) | | | | $ | 880,251,486 |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 0.8% | | | | | 7,029,338 |
Net Assets - 100.0% | | | | $ | 887,280,824 |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(d) | Non-income producing security – in default. |
(g) | The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on settled positions at period end, unless otherwise indicated. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $132,025,200, representing 14.9% of net assets. |
(o) | All or a portion of this position has not settled. Upon settlement date, interest rates for unsettled amounts will be determined. The rate shown represents the weighted average coupon rate for settled amounts. |
(p) | Payment-in-kind security. |
(q) | All or a portion of this position represents an unfunded loan commitment. The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on the full position, including the unfunded loan commitment which has no current coupon rate. |
(r) | Remaining maturities of floating rate loans may be less than stated maturities shown as a result of contractual or optional prepayments by the borrower. Such prepayments cannot be predicted with certainty. These loans may be subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans generally have rates of interest which are determined periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium. |
(v) | Underlying fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
20
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
| | | | | | |
Restricted Securities | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | Current Market Value |
Airlie Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0%, 2011 | | 10/13/06-7/22/09 | | $2,423,653 | | $436,257 |
American Media Operations, Inc., 9%, 2013 | | 1/30/09-5/01/09 | | 165,816 | | 124,032 |
American Media Operations, Inc., 14%, 2013 | | 1/30/09-5/01/09 | | 1,465,448 | | 1,259,525 |
Anthracite Ltd., CDO, 6%, 2037 | | 5/14/02 | | 4,381,853 | | 411,840 |
Arch Coal, Inc., 8.75%, 2016 | | 7/28/09 | | 1,671,520 | | 1,732,150 |
Bonten Media Acquisition Co., 9%, 2015 | | 5/22/07-6/01/09 | | 4,644,114 | | 1,217,585 |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “E2”, 6%, 2045 | | 3/20/06 | | 958,727 | | 20,000 |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “F”, FRN, 1.804%, 2050 | | 4/12/06 | | 610,000 | | 12,200 |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “G”, FRN, 2.004%, 2050 | | 4/12/06 | | 1,890,000 | | 37,800 |
Commercial Barge Line Co., 12.5%, 2017 | | 7/01/09-7/20/09 | | 1,568,357 | | 1,575,088 |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.693%, 2025 | | 1/29/03 | | 1,270,264 | | 805,554 |
LBI Media, Inc., 8.5%, 2017 | | 7/18/07 | | 1,429,407 | | 761,250 |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 | | 11/09/07-6/15/09 | | 4,997,219 | | 1,078,780 |
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., 1.276%, 2039 | | 7/20/04 | | 659,468 | | 414,540 |
Preferred Blocker, Inc., 7% (Preferred Stock) | | 12/29/08 | | 1,406,020 | | 840,816 |
SBA Telecommunications, Inc., 8%, 2016 | | 7/21/09 | | 928,750 | | 944,350 |
SBA Telecommunications, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | | 7/21/09 | | 788,268 | | 806,925 |
TIERS Beach Street Synthetic, CLO, FRN, 6.788%, 2011 | | 5/17/06 | | 2,750,000 | | 550,000 |
Toys “R” Us, Inc., 10.75%, 2017 | | 7/01/09-7/27/09 | | 4,051,980 | | 4,187,125 |
USG Corp., 9.75%, 2014 | | 7/30/09 | | 544,377 | | 566,100 |
USI Holdings Corp., 9.75%, 2015 | | 4/26/07-6/08/07 | | 3,195,898 | | 2,326,275 |
Wachovia Credit, CDO, FRN, 1.958%, 2026 | | 6/08/06 | | 1,320,000 | | 52,800 |
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 10.75%, 2015 | | 11/22/05-9/12/06 | | 4,927,026 | | 5,003,200 |
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | $25,164,192 |
% of Net Assets | | | | | | 2.8% |
21
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Derivative Contracts at 7/31/09
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 7/31/09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type | | Currency | | Counterparty | | Contracts to Deliver/ Receive | | Settlement Date Range | | In Exchange for | | Contracts at Value | | Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Liability Derivatives | |
SELL | | EUR | | HSBC BANK | | 2,289,000 | | 9/17/09 | | $3,223,954 | | $3,262,634 | | $(38,680 | ) |
SELL | | EUR | | UBS AG | | 5,043,714 | | 9/17/09 | | $7,106,896 | | $7,189,075 | | (82,179 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $(120,859 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At July 31, 2009, the fund had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover any commitments under these derivative contracts.
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
CLO | | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | | Public Limited Company |
Abbreviations indicate amounts shown in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. All amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. A list of abbreviations is shown below:
See Notes to Financial Statements
22
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 7/31/09 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
| | | |
Assets | | | |
Investments- | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $935,104,576) | | $838,488,428 | |
Underlying funds, at cost and value | | 41,763,058 | |
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $976,867,634) | | $880,251,486 | |
Cash | | 1,581,884 | |
Receivables for | | | |
Investments sold | | 5,014,928 | |
Fund shares sold | | 816,839 | |
Interest and dividends | | 17,362,344 | |
Other assets | | 3,524 | |
Total assets | | $905,031,005 | |
Liabilities | | | |
Payables for | | | |
Distributions | | $1,263,283 | |
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | 120,859 | |
Investments purchased | | 13,978,168 | |
Fund shares reacquired | | 1,802,738 | |
Payable to affiliates | | | |
Investment adviser | | 22,108 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | 194,169 | |
Distribution and service fees | | 13,514 | |
Administrative services fee | | 889 | |
Program manager fees | | 7 | |
Payable for independent trustees’ compensation | | 83,639 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | 270,807 | |
Total liabilities | | $17,750,181 | |
Net assets | | $887,280,824 | |
Net assets consist of | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $1,493,449,441 | |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | (96,714,448 | ) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | | (510,022,108 | ) |
Undistributed net investment income | | 567,939 | |
Net assets | | $887,280,824 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | | 299,527,417 | |
23
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
| | Net assets | | Shares outstanding | | Net asset value per share (a) |
Class A | | $495,539,683 | | 167,340,934 | | $2.96 |
Class B | | 51,300,059 | | 17,277,703 | | 2.97 |
Class C | | 68,269,624 | | 22,951,768 | | 2.97 |
Class I | | 257,712,123 | | 87,075,148 | | 2.96 |
Class R1 | | 1,190,839 | | 401,510 | | 2.97 |
Class R2 | | 4,158,745 | | 1,403,148 | | 2.96 |
Class R3 | | 7,747,643 | | 2,617,332 | | 2.96 |
Class R4 | | 128,821 | | 43,489 | | 2.96 |
Class 529A | | 694,646 | | 234,676 | | 2.96 |
Class 529B | | 248,562 | | 83,959 | | 2.96 |
Class 529C | | 290,079 | | 97,750 | | 2.97 |
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering prices of Class A and Class 529A shares are reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, Class C, Class 529B, and Class 529C shares.
(a) | Maximum offering price and redemption price per share were equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Classes A and 529A, for which the maximum offering prices per share were $3.11 and $3.11, respectively. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | | |
Income | | | | | | |
Interest | | $35,017,246 | | | | |
Dividends | | 660,543 | | | | |
Dividends from underlying funds | | 40,307 | | | | |
Total investment income | | | | | $35,718,096 | |
Expenses | | | | | | |
Management fee | | $1,571,799 | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | 953,450 | | | | |
Program manager fees | | 514 | | | | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | 790,573 | | | | |
Administrative services fee | | 69,736 | | | | |
Independent trustees’ compensation | | 25,924 | | | | |
Custodian fee | | 49,029 | | | | |
Shareholder communications | | 56,201 | | | | |
Auditing fees | | 33,450 | | | | |
Legal fees | | 22,217 | | | | |
Miscellaneous | | 91,406 | | | | |
Total expenses | | | | | $3,664,299 | |
Fees paid indirectly | | (24,071 | ) | | | |
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser | | (2,854 | ) | | | |
Net expenses | | | | | $3,637,374 | |
Net investment income | | | | | $32,080,722 | |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | | | | | | |
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $(27,429,123 | ) | | | |
Swap transactions | | (11,352,995 | ) | | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | 118,193 | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | | | | | $(38,663,925 | ) |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | | | |
Investments | | $159,634,146 | | | | |
Swap transactions | | 9,483,556 | | | | |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | (869,430 | ) | | | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | | | $168,248,272 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | | | $129,584,347 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | | | $161,665,069 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
| | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Year ended 1/31/09 | |
Change in net assets | | | | |
From operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $32,080,722 | | | $66,750,841 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | | (38,663,925 | ) | | (69,846,251 | ) |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | 168,248,272 | | | (201,411,630 | ) |
Change in net assets from operations | | $161,665,069 | | | $(204,507,040 | ) |
Distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(33,580,201 | ) | | $(68,512,369 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (507,505 | ) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(33,580,201 | ) | | $(69,019,874 | ) |
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | | $109,464,860 | | | $(39,014,000 | ) |
Total change in net assets | | $237,549,728 | | | $(312,540,914 | ) |
Net assets | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | | 649,731,096 | | | 962,272,010 | |
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $567,939 and $2,067,418, respectively) | | $887,280,824 | | | $649,731,096 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Financial Statements
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09
(unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class A | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | | | $3.98 | | | $3.98 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.12 | | | $0.26 | | | $0.27 | | | $0.27 | | | $0.27 | | | $0.29 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.48 | | | (1.08 | ) | | (0.31 | ) | | 0.11 | | | (0.13 | ) | | 0.01 | (g) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.60 | | | $(0.82 | ) | | $(0.04 | ) | | $0.38 | | | $0.14 | | | $0.30 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.13 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.30 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.30 | ) | | $(0.30 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.13 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.30 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.30 | ) | | $(0.30 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.96 | | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | | | $3.98 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 24.75 | (n) | | (24.05 | ) | | (1.20 | ) | | 10.30 | | | 3.61 | | | 7.74 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.05 | (a) | | 1.05 | | | 0.97 | | | 1.00 | | | 1.00 | | | 0.99 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.05 | (a) | | 1.05 | | | 0.97 | | | 1.00 | | | 1.00 | | | 0.99 | |
Net investment income | | 9.40 | (a) | | 8.22 | | | 7.17 | | | 7.09 | | | 6.85 | | | 7.31 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | | | 68 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $495,540 | | | $360,076 | | | $504,159 | | | $671,019 | | | $703,305 | | | $799,651 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09
(unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class B | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.50 | | | $3.59 | | | $3.93 | | | $3.83 | | | $3.99 | | | $3.99 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.11 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.25 | | | $0.25 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.26 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.48 | | | (1.08 | ) | | (0.32 | ) | | 0.10 | | | (0.13 | ) | | 0.01 | (g) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.59 | | | $(0.84 | ) | | $(0.07 | ) | | $0.35 | | | $0.11 | | | $0.27 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.97 | | | $2.50 | | | $3.59 | | | $3.93 | | | $3.83 | | | $3.99 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 24.23 | (n) | | (24.51 | ) | | (1.87 | ) | | 9.53 | | | 2.90 | | | 7.10 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.79 | (a) | | 1.75 | | | 1.67 | | | 1.71 | | | 1.72 | | | 1.69 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.79 | (a) | | 1.75 | | | 1.67 | | | 1.71 | | | 1.72 | | | 1.69 | |
Net investment income | | 8.73 | (a) | | 7.41 | | | 6.47 | | | 6.40 | | | 6.26 | | | 6.63 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | | | 68 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $51,300 | | | $52,384 | | | $113,331 | | | $195,028 | | | $275,363 | | | $379,253 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09
(unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class C | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.50 | | | $3.60 | | | $3.94 | | | $3.84 | | | $4.00 | | | $4.00 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.11 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.25 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.26 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.48 | | | (1.09 | ) | | (0.32 | ) | | 0.11 | | | (0.13 | ) | | 0.01 | (g) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.59 | | | $(0.85 | ) | | $(0.07 | ) | | $0.35 | | | $0.11 | | | $0.27 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.97 | | | $2.50 | | | $3.60 | | | $3.94 | | | $3.84 | | | $4.00 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 24.23 | (n) | | (24.72 | ) | | (1.84 | ) | | 9.52 | | | 2.91 | | | 7.10 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.79 | (a) | | 1.75 | | | 1.67 | | | 1.70 | | | 1.72 | | | 1.69 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.79 | (a) | | 1.75 | | | 1.67 | | | 1.70 | | | 1.72 | | | 1.69 | |
Net investment income | | 8.59 | (a) | | 7.44 | | | 6.46 | | | 6.39 | | | 6.26 | | | 6.63 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | | | 68 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $68,270 | | | $39,345 | | | $69,505 | | | $92,050 | | | $108,181 | | | $148,073 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09
(unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class I | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | | | $3.98 | | | $3.98 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.12 | | | $0.27 | | | $0.29 | | | $0.28 | | | $0.28 | | | $0.29 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.48 | | | (1.08 | ) | | (0.32 | ) | | 0.11 | | | (0.13 | ) | | 0.02 | (g) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.60 | | | $(0.81 | ) | | $(0.03 | ) | | $0.39 | | | $0.15 | | | $0.31 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.13 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.31 | ) | | $(0.29 | ) | | $(0.31 | ) | | $(0.31 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.13 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.31 | ) | | $(0.29 | ) | | $(0.31 | ) | | $(0.31 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.96 | | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | | | $3.98 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 24.90 | (n) | | (23.82 | ) | | (0.90 | ) | | 10.62 | | | 3.92 | | | 8.17 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 0.79 | (a) | | 0.76 | | | 0.67 | | | 0.70 | | | 0.71 | | | 0.68 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 0.79 | (a) | | 0.76 | | | 0.67 | | | 0.70 | | | 0.71 | | | 0.68 | |
Net investment income | | 9.64 | (a) | | 8.55 | | | 7.47 | | | 7.38 | | | 7.24 | | | 7.55 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | | | 68 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $257,712 | | | $185,811 | | | $257,572 | | | $246,306 | | | $231,455 | | | $170,679 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09
(unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R1 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 (i) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.50 | | | $3.59 | | | $3.93 | | | $3.83 | | | $3.89 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.11 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.19 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.48 | | | (1.09 | ) | | (0.31 | ) | | 0.11 | | | (0.03 | )(g) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.59 | | | $(0.85 | ) | | $(0.07 | ) | | $0.35 | | | $0.16 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.24 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) | | $(0.22 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.24 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) | | $(0.22 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.97 | | | $2.50 | | | $3.59 | | | $3.93 | | | $3.83 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 24.23 | (n) | | (24.52 | ) | | (1.96 | ) | | 9.41 | | | 4.28 | (n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.79 | (a) | | 1.76 | | | 1.77 | | | 1.89 | | | 1.91 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.79 | (a) | | 1.76 | | | 1.76 | | | 1.79 | | | 1.85 | (a) |
Net investment income | | 8.66 | (a) | | 7.53 | | | 6.35 | | | 6.27 | | | 6.08 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $1,191 | | | $937 | | | $1,273 | | | $361 | | | $231 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09
(unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R2 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.93 | | | $3.83 | | | $3.98 | | | $3.98 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.12 | | | $0.25 | | | $0.26 | | | $0.26 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.25 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.47 | | | (1.08 | ) | | (0.32 | ) | | 0.10 | | | (0.11 | ) | | 0.03 | (g) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.59 | | | $(0.83 | ) | | $(0.06 | ) | | $0.36 | | | $0.13 | | | $0.28 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.29 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.29 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.96 | | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.93 | | | $3.83 | | | $3.98 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 24.61 | (n) | | (24.21 | ) | | (1.79 | ) | | 9.91 | | | 3.45 | | | 7.37 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.29 | (a) | | 1.25 | | | 1.30 | | | 1.44 | | | 1.46 | | | 1.49 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.29 | (a) | | 1.25 | | | 1.29 | | | 1.34 | | | 1.42 | | | 1.49 | |
Net investment income | | 9.21 | (a) | | 7.99 | | | 6.83 | | | 6.71 | | | 6.61 | | | 6.58 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | | | 68 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $4,159 | | | $3,446 | | | $5,525 | | | $2,406 | | | $1,212 | | | $246 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R3 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 (i) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | | | $3.88 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.12 | | | $0.26 | | | $0.27 | | | $0.27 | | | $0.21 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.48 | | | (1.08 | ) | | (0.31 | ) | | 0.10 | | | (0.02 | )(g) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.60 | | | $(0.82 | ) | | $(0.04 | ) | | $0.37 | | | $0.19 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.13 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.30 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.13 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.30 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.25 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.96 | | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 24.75 | (n) | | (24.02 | ) | | (1.28 | ) | | 10.18 | | | 4.94 | (n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.04 | (a) | | 1.01 | | | 1.05 | | | 1.07 | | | 1.15 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.04 | (a) | | 1.01 | | | 1.05 | | | 1.07 | | | 1.15 | (a) |
Net investment income | | 9.46 | (a) | | 8.35 | | | 7.08 | | | 6.90 | | | 6.73 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $7,748 | | | $6,706 | | | $8,065 | | | $5,143 | | | $393 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
33
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R4 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 (i) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | | | $3.88 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.12 | | | $0.27 | | | $0.28 | | | $0.28 | | | $0.23 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.48 | | | (1.08 | ) | | (0.31 | ) | | 0.11 | | | (0.03 | )(g) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.60 | | | $(0.81 | ) | | $(0.03 | ) | | $0.39 | | | $0.20 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.13 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.31 | ) | | $(0.29 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.13 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.31 | ) | | $(0.29 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.96 | | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 24.90 | (n) | | (23.82 | ) | | (0.99 | ) | | 10.52 | | | 5.20 | (n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 0.78 | (a) | | 0.76 | | | 0.76 | | | 0.80 | | | 0.80 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 0.78 | (a) | | 0.76 | | | 0.76 | | | 0.80 | | | 0.80 | (a) |
Net investment income | | 9.35 | (a) | | 8.56 | | | 7.38 | | | 7.29 | | | 7.11 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $129 | | | $44 | | | $58 | | | $58 | | | $53 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
34
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class 529A | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | | | $3.98 | | | $3.98 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.12 | | | $0.25 | | | $0.26 | | | $0.26 | | | $0.26 | | | $0.27 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.48 | | | (1.08 | ) | | (0.31 | ) | | 0.11 | | | (0.14 | ) | | 0.02 | (g) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.60 | | | $(0.83 | ) | | $(0.05 | ) | | $0.37 | | | $0.12 | | | $0.29 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.13 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.29 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.29 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.13 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.29 | ) | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.29 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.96 | | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | | | $3.98 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 24.68 | (n) | | (24.19 | ) | | (1.49 | ) | | 9.97 | | | 3.30 | | | 7.53 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.16 | (a) | | 1.23 | | | 1.27 | | | 1.30 | | | 1.32 | | | 1.29 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.16 | (a) | | 1.23 | | | 1.27 | | | 1.30 | | | 1.32 | | | 1.29 | |
Net investment income | | 9.34 | (a) | | 8.07 | | | 6.87 | | | 6.78 | | | 6.65 | | | 6.97 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | | | 68 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $695 | | | $579 | | | $849 | | | $854 | | | $776 | | | $768 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
35
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended
7/31/09
(unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class 529B | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | | | $3.97 | | | $3.98 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.11 | | | $0.23 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.23 | | | $0.23 | | | $0.25 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.48 | | | (1.08 | ) | | (0.32 | ) | | 0.11 | | | (0.12 | ) | | 0.00 | (g)(w) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.59 | | | $(0.85 | ) | | $(0.08 | ) | | $0.34 | | | $0.11 | | | $0.25 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.24 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.24 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.24 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.24 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.96 | | | $2.49 | | | $3.58 | | | $3.92 | | | $3.82 | | | $3.97 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 24.25 | (n) | | (24.70 | ) | | (2.13 | ) | | 9.26 | | | 2.89 | | | 6.57 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.89 | (a) | | 1.88 | | | 1.92 | | | 1.95 | | | 1.96 | | | 2.01 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.89 | (a) | | 1.88 | | | 1.92 | | | 1.95 | | | 1.96 | | | 2.01 | |
Net investment income | | 8.55 | (a) | | 7.43 | | | 6.22 | | | 6.13 | | | 6.00 | | | 6.29 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | | | 68 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $249 | | | $183 | | | $213 | | | $202 | | | $157 | | | $139 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
36
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class 529C | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $2.50 | | | $3.59 | | | $3.93 | | | $3.83 | | | $3.99 | | | $3.99 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.11 | | | $0.23 | | | $0.24 | | | $0.23 | | | $0.23 | | | $0.25 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.48 | | | (1.08 | ) | | (0.32 | ) | | 0.11 | | | (0.13 | ) | | 0.01 | (g) |
Total from investment operations | | $0.59 | | | $(0.85 | ) | | $(0.08 | ) | | $0.34 | | | $0.10 | | | $0.26 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.24 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.24 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.12 | ) | | $(0.24 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.24 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.26 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $2.97 | | | $2.50 | | | $3.59 | | | $3.93 | | | $3.83 | | | $3.99 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 24.17 | (n) | | (24.61 | ) | | (2.11 | ) | | 9.26 | | | 2.64 | | | 6.84 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.89 | (a) | | 1.88 | | | 1.92 | | | 1.95 | | | 1.96 | | | 1.97 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.89 | (a) | | 1.88 | | | 1.91 | | | 1.95 | | | 1.96 | | | 1.97 | |
Net investment income | | 8.54 | (a) | | 7.39 | | | 6.21 | | | 6.13 | | | 6.00 | | | 6.31 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 26 | | | 61 | | | 66 | | | 89 | | | 51 | | | 68 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $290 | | | $221 | | | $322 | | | $500 | | | $417 | | | $347 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
37
Financial Highlights – continued
(d) | Per share data are based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(g) | The per share amount is not in accordance with the net realized and unrealized gain/loss for the period because of the timing of sales of fund shares and the per share amount of realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(i) | For the period from the class’ inception, April 1, 2005 (Classes R1, R3, and R4) through the stated period end. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(w) | Per share amount was less than $0.01. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
38
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) | | Business and Organization |
MFS High Income Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust III (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) | | Significant Accounting Policies |
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In making these estimates and assumptions, management has considered the effects, if any, of events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through September 16, 2009 which is the date that the financial statements were issued. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The fund can invest up to 100% of its portfolio in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions. The fund can invest in foreign securities, including securities of emerging market issuers. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment. The markets of emerging markets countries are generally more volatile than the markets of developed countries with more mature economies. All of the risks of investing in foreign securities previously described are heightened when investing in emerging markets countries.
Investment Valuations – Equity securities, including restricted equity securities, are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which they are primarily traded. For securities for which there were no sales reported that day, equity securities are generally valued at the last quoted daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which such securities are primarily traded. For securities held short for which there were no sales reported for that day, the position is generally valued at the last quoted daily ask quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which such securities are primarily traded. Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than
39
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Forward foreign currency contracts are generally valued at the mean of bid and asked prices for the time period interpolated from rates provided by a third-party pricing service for proximate time periods. Swaps are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. Events that occur on a frequent basis after foreign markets close (such as developments in foreign markets and significant movements in the U.S. markets) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value may be deemed to have a material affect on the value of securities traded in foreign markets. Accordingly, the fund’s foreign equity securities may often be valued at fair value. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in
40
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities carried at market value. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures, forwards, swap contracts, and written options. The following is a summary of the levels used as of July 31, 2009 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities carried at market value:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Investments at Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | Total | |
Equity Securities | | $9,514,201 | | $840,949 | | | $121,450 | | $10,476,600 | |
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | | — | | 1,337,166 | | | — | | 1,337,166 | |
Corporate Bonds | | — | | 653,056,902 | | | — | | 653,056,902 | |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | | — | | 33,482,958 | | | — | | 33,482,958 | |
Floating Rate Loans | | — | | 74,358,099 | | | 45,648 | | 74,403,747 | |
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | | — | | 1,436,428 | | | 436,257 | | 1,872,685 | |
Foreign Bonds | | — | | 60,007,146 | | | — | | 60,007,146 | |
Other Fixed Income Securities | | — | | 3,851,224 | | | — | | 3,851,224 | |
Mutual Funds | | 41,763,058 | | — | | | — | | 41,763,058 | |
Total Investments | | $51,277,259 | | $828,370,872 | | | $603,355 | | $880,251,486 | |
| | | | |
Other Financial Instruments | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | Total | |
Forward Currency Contracts | | $— | | $(120,859 | ) | | $— | | $(120,859 | ) |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
41
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value. The table presents the activity of Level 3 securities held at the beginning and the end of the period.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Equity Securities | | | Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | | Floating Rate Loans | |
Balance as of 1/31/09 | | $229,561 | | | $— | | $— | |
Accrued discounts/premiums | | — | | | — | | (14 | ) |
Realized gain (loss) | | — | | | — | | — | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | (108,111 | ) | | — | | (439,822 | ) |
Net purchases (sales) | | — | | | — | | 483,484 | |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | | — | | | 436,257 | | — | |
Balance as of 7/31/09 | | $121,450 | | | $436,257 | | $45,648 | |
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Derivatives – The fund may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the fund, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives may be used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
In this reporting period the fund adopted FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“FAS 161”), and FASB Staff Position FAS No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FAS 161 (“FSP FAS 133-1”).
42
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
FAS 161 amends FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities (“FAS 133”). FAS 161 provides enhanced disclosures about the fund’s use of and accounting for derivative instruments and the effect of derivative instruments on the fund’s results of operations and financial position. Under FAS 161, tabular disclosure regarding derivative fair value and gain/loss by contract type (e.g., interest rate contracts, foreign exchange contracts, credit contracts, etc.) is required and derivatives accounted for as hedging instruments under FAS 133 must be disclosed separately from derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133. Because investment companies account for their derivatives at fair value and record any changes in fair value in current period earnings, the fund’s derivatives are not accounted for as hedging instruments under FAS 133. As such, even though the fund may use derivatives in an attempt to achieve an economic hedge, the fund’s derivatives are not considered to be hedging instruments under FAS 133.
FSP FAS 133-1 amends FAS 133 to require sellers of credit derivatives to make disclosures that will enable financial statement users to assess the potential effects of those credit derivatives on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. As defined by FSP FAS 133-1, a credit derivative is a derivative instrument (a) in which one or more of the derivative’s underlyings are related to the credit risk of a specified entity (or group of entities) or an index based on the credit risk of a group of entities and (b) that exposes the seller to potential loss from credit-risk-related events specified in the derivative contract. The seller (or writer) is the party that provides the credit protection and assumes the credit risk on a credit derivatives contract, such as a credit default swap. There was no impact from implementing FSP 133-1 as the fund did not hold any of these credit derivatives at period end.
As defined under FAS 133, derivative instruments include written options, purchased options, futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at July 31, 2009:
| | | | | | |
| | | | Liability Derivatives |
| | | | Location on Statement of Assets and Liabilities | | Fair Value |
Foreign Exchange Contracts not Accounted for as Hedging Instruments Under FAS 133 | | Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | $120,859 |
43
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2009 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Foreign Currency Transactions | | Swap Transactions | | | Total | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | $116,495 | | $— | | | $116,495 | |
Credit Contracts | | — | | (11,352,995 | ) | | (11,352,995 | ) |
Total | | $116,495 | | $(11,352,995 | ) | | $(11,236,500 | ) |
The following table presents by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2009 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Translation of Assets and Liabilities in Foreign Currencies | | | Swap Transactions | | Total | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | $(894,145 | ) | | $— | | $(894,145 | ) |
Credit Contracts | | — | | | 9,483,556 | | 9,483,556 | |
Total | | $(894,145 | ) | | $9,483,556 | | $8,589,411 | |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported balance sheet assets and liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
44
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forwards, swaps and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts – The fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date to hedge the fund’s currency risk or for non-hedging purposes. For hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts to deliver or receive foreign currency that the fund will receive from or use in its normal investment activities. The fund may also use contracts to hedge against declines in the value of foreign currency denominated securities due to unfavorable exchange rate movements. For non-hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts with the intent of changing the relative exposure of the fund’s portfolio of securities to different currencies to take advantage of anticipated exchange rate changes.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a receivable or payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts until the contract settlement date. On contract settlement date, any gain or loss on the contract is recorded as realized gains or losses on foreign currency transactions.
Risks may arise upon entering into these contracts from unanticipated movements in the value of the contract and from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The fund’s maximum risk due to counterparty credit risk is the notional amount of the contract. This risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Swap Agreements – The fund may enter into swap agreements. A swap is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap
45
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
transactions in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap are reflected as premiums paid or received on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap transactions are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. The risk is further mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
The fund may enter into credit default swaps to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the contract notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although contract-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant contract. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference
46
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
between the value of the deliverable obligation and the swap’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the contract. This risk is mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Hybrid Instruments – The fund may invest in indexed or hybrid securities on which any combination of interest payments, the principal or stated amount payable at maturity is determined by reference to prices of other securities, currencies, indices, economic factors or other measures, including interest rates, currency exchange rates, or securities indices. The risks of investing in hybrid instruments reflect a combination of the risks of investing in securities, swaps, options, futures and currencies. Hybrid instruments are potentially more volatile and carry greater market risks than traditional debt instruments. Depending on the structure of the particular hybrid instrument, changes in a benchmark, underlying assets or economic indicator may be magnified by the terms of the hybrid instrument and have an even more dramatic and substantial effect upon the value of the hybrid instrument. Also, the prices of the hybrid instrument and the benchmark, underlying asset or economic indicator may not move in the same direction or at the same time.
Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments – The fund may invest in loans and loan participations or other receivables. These investments may include standby financing commitments, including revolving credit facilities, which obligate the fund to supply additional cash to the borrower on demand. At July 31, 2009, the portfolio had unfunded loan commitments of $189,496, which could be extended at the option of the borrower and which are covered by sufficient cash and/or liquid securities held by the fund. The market value and obligation of the fund on these unfunded loan commitments is included in Investments, at value and Payable for investments purchased, respectively, on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Loan participations involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other financial intermediary.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
47
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fund earns certain fees in connection with its floating rate loan purchasing activities. These fees are in addition to interest payments earned and may include amendment fees, commitment fees, facility fees, consent fees, and prepayment fees. Commitment fees are recorded on an accrual basis as income in the accompanying financial statements. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended July 31, 2009, is shown as a reduction of total expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Foreign taxes, if any, have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for
48
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to expiration of capital loss carryforwards, amortization and accretion of debt securities, distressed securities, and derivative transactions.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
| | |
| | 1/31/09 |
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | | $68,512,369 |
Tax return of capital (a) | | 507,505 |
Total distributions | | $69,019,874 |
(a) Distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits are reported in the financial statements as a tax return of capital. |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
| | | |
As of 7/31/09 | | | |
Cost of investments | | $981,001,841 | |
Gross appreciation | | 31,389,488 | |
Gross depreciation | | (132,139,843 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $(100,750,355 | ) |
| |
As of 1/31/09 | | | |
Capital loss carryforwards | | (437,763,394 | ) |
Post-October capital loss deferral | | (30,179,552 | ) |
Other temporary differences | | (6,719,006 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | (255,688,949 | ) |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments.
As of January 31, 2009, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
| | | |
1/31/10 | | $(137,538,425 | ) |
1/31/11 | | (159,064,624 | ) |
1/31/13 | | (19,406,719 | ) |
1/31/14 | | (20,012,633 | ) |
1/31/15 | | (43,037,657 | ) |
1/31/17 | | (58,703,336 | ) |
| | $(437,763,394 | ) |
49
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution, service, and program manager fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B and Class 529B shares will convert to Class A and Class 529A shares, respectively approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | From net investment income | | From tax return of capital |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | Year ended 1/31/09 | | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | Year ended 1/31/09 |
Class A | | $18,050,014 | | $36,552,210 | | $— | | $270,761 |
Class B | | 2,245,748 | | 6,362,206 | | — | | 47,128 |
Class C | | 1,939,394 | | 4,269,372 | | — | | 31,625 |
Class I | | 10,747,110 | | 20,049,310 | | — | | 148,515 |
Class R (b) | | — | | 12,334 | | — | | 91 |
Class R1 | | 44,559 | | 84,430 | | — | | 625 |
Former Class R2 (b) | | — | | 11,336 | | — | | 84 |
Class R2 | | 172,242 | | 412,375 | | — | | 3,055 |
Class R3 | | 327,971 | | 655,155 | | — | | 4,853 |
Class R4 | | 4,658 | | 4,586 | | — | | 34 |
Class 529A | | 28,716 | | 60,111 | | — | | 445 |
Class 529B | | 9,036 | | 16,448 | | — | | 122 |
Class 529C | | 10,753 | | 22,496 | | — | | 167 |
Total | | $33,580,201 | | $68,512,369 | | $— | | $507,505 |
(b) | At the close of business on April 18, 2008, Class R and Class R2 shares converted into Class R3 shares. Following the conversion, Class R3 shares were renamed Class R2 shares. |
(3) | | Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund.
The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at the following annual rates:
| | | |
First $1.4 billion of average daily net assets | | 0.46 | % |
Average daily net assets in excess of $1.4 billion | | 0.44 | % |
As part of a settlement agreement with the New York Attorney General concerning market timing and related matters, MFS had agreed to reduce the management fee to 0.39% of the fund’s average daily net assets in excess of
50
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
$1.4 billion for the period March 1, 2004 through February 28, 2009. For the period February 1, 2009 through February 28, 2009, the fund’s average daily net assets did not exceed $1.4 billion, and therefore, the management fee was not reduced.
The management fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2009 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.46% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $22,598 and $64 for the six months ended July 31, 2009, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A and Class 529A shares of the fund, respectively.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Distribution Fee Rate (d) | | Service Fee Rate (d) | | Total Distribution Plan (d) | | Annual Effective Rate (e) | | Distribution and Service Fee |
Class A | | — | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 0.26% | | $471,208 |
Class B | | 0.75% | | 0.25% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 243,932 |
Class C | | 0.75% | | 0.25% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 213,220 |
Class R1 | | 0.75% | | 0.25% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 4,885 |
Class R2 | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 0.50% | | 0.50% | | 8,933 |
Class R3 | | — | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 8,296 |
Class 529A | | — | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 0.26% | | 779 |
Class 529B | | 0.75% | | 0.25% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 1,002 |
Class 529C | | 0.75% | | 0.25% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 1,195 |
Total Distribution and Service Fees | | | | | | | | $953,450 |
(d) | As of July 31, 2009, in accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended July 31, 2009 based on each class’ average daily net assets. Assets attributable to Class A shares sold prior to March 1, 1991 are subject to a service fee of 0.15% annually. Effective March 1, 2009 the 0.10% Class A and 0.25% Class 529A annual distribution fees were eliminated. Prior to March 1, 2009, 0.05% of the Class A and 0.10% of the Class 529A distribution fees were paid by the fund. Payment of the remaining 0.05% of the Class A and 0.15% of the Class 529A distribution fee were not in effect. |
51
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Certain Class A shares purchased prior to September 1, 2008 are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Certain Class A shares purchased on or subsequent to September 1, 2008 are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 24 months of purchase. Class C and Class 529C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B and Class 529B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended July 31, 2009, were as follows:
| | |
| | Amount |
Class A | | $— |
Class B | | 26,497 |
Class C | | 975 |
Class 529B | | 158 |
Class 529C | | — |
The fund has entered into and may from time to time enter into contracts with program managers and other parties which administer the tuition programs through which an investment in the fund’s 529 share classes is made. The fund has entered into an agreement with MFD pursuant to which MFD receives an annual fee of up to 0.10% of the average daily net assets attributable to each 529 share class. The services provided by MFD, or a third party with which MFD contracts, include recordkeeping and tax reporting and account services, as well as services designed to maintain the program’s compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and other regulatory requirements. Program manager fees for the six months ended July 31, 2009, were as follows:
| | |
| | Amount |
Class 529A | | $294 |
Class 529B | | 100 |
Class 529C | | 120 |
Total Program Manager Fees | | $514 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, the fee was $291,368, which equated to 0.0852% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $252,931.
52
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Under a Special Servicing Agreement among MFS, each MFS fund which invests in other MFS funds (“MFS fund-of-funds”) and certain underlying funds in which a MFS fund-of-funds invests (“underlying funds”), each underlying fund may pay a portion of each MFS fund-of-fund’s transfer agent-related expenses, including sub-accounting fees payable to financial intermediaries, to the extent such payments do not exceed the benefits realized or expected to be realized by the underlying fund from the investment in the underlying fund by the MFS fund-of-fund. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, these costs for the fund amounted to $246,274 and are reflected in the shareholder servicing costs on the Statement of Operations.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2009 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0204% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
For certain independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001, the fund has an unfunded, defined benefit plan which resulted in a pension expense of $3,522. For certain independent Trustees who served on the Board as of December 31, 2001, the fund also has an unfunded retirement benefit deferral plan which resulted in an expense of $9,048. Both amounts are included in independent trustees’ compensation for the six months ended July 31, 2009. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent trustees under both plans amounted to $83,263 at July 31, 2009, and is included in payable for independent trustees’ compensation.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with
53
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $3,602 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $2,854, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund may invest in a money market fund managed by MFS which seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in dividends from underlying funds on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
Purchases and sales of investments, other than U.S. Government securities, purchased option transactions, and short-term obligations, aggregated $223,256,995 and $172,096,940, respectively.
(5) | | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | Year ended 1/31/09 |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount |
Shares sold | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 31,973,349 | | $84,168,203 | | 39,270,614 | | $114,346,041 |
Class B | | 1,833,253 | | 4,771,538 | | 2,108,924 | | 6,080,678 |
Class C | | 2,905,231 | | 7,609,295 | | 2,621,548 | | 7,756,685 |
Class I | | 26,422,719 | | 62,825,007 | | 10,454,235 | | 28,461,154 |
Class R (b) | | — | | — | | 8,814 | | 30,815 |
Class R1 | | 65,107 | | 165,904 | | 135,640 | | 430,416 |
Former Class R2 (b) | | — | | — | | 16,760 | | 59,117 |
Class R2 | | 314,568 | | 809,630 | | 770,913 | | 2,583,947 |
Class R3 | | 479,363 | | 1,206,027 | | 867,250 | | 2,705,416 |
Class R4 | | 24,139 | | 56,485 | | — | | — |
Class 529A | | 30,714 | | 78,826 | | 26,934 | | 86,553 |
Class 529B | | 23,408 | | 59,431 | | 29,584 | | 96,818 |
Class 529C | | 13,756 | | 34,642 | | 15,685 | | 55,574 |
| | 64,085,607 | | $161,784,988 | | 56,326,901 | | $162,693,214 |
54
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | | Year ended 1/31/09 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares issued in connection with acquisition of MFS Floating Rate High Income Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 17,654,238 | | | $51,197,290 | | | — | | | $— | |
Class C | | 5,697,032 | | | 16,578,364 | | | — | | | — | |
Class I | | 940,064 | | | 2,726,184 | | | — | | | — | |
| | 24,291,334 | | | $70,501,838 | | | — | | | $— | |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 4,845,767 | | | $12,725,441 | | | 8,522,508 | | | $25,840,768 | |
Class B | | 507,801 | | | 1,325,830 | | | 1,215,842 | | | 3,755,641 | |
Class C | | 452,274 | | | 1,194,776 | | | 827,066 | | | 2,537,042 | |
Class I | | 3,920,155 | | | 10,310,007 | | | 6,599,491 | | | 19,991,465 | |
Class R (b) | | — | | | — | | | 2,377 | | | 8,295 | |
Class R1 | | 16,893 | | | 44,398 | | | 28,088 | | | 84,499 | |
Former Class R2 (b) | | — | | | — | | | 2,439 | | | 8,524 | |
Class R2 | | 63,736 | | | 166,957 | | | 130,775 | | | 401,436 | |
Class R3 | | 124,410 | | | 326,094 | | | 220,194 | | | 659,427 | |
Class R4 | | 1,741 | | | 4,658 | | | 1,532 | | | 4,620 | |
Class 529A | | 10,824 | | | 28,403 | | | 19,892 | | | 60,117 | |
Class 529B | | 3,380 | | | 8,889 | | | 5,411 | | | 16,298 | |
Class 529C | | 4,044 | | | 10,653 | | | 7,407 | | | 22,490 | |
| | 9,951,025 | | | $26,146,106 | | | 17,583,022 | | | $53,390,622 | |
Shares reacquired | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | (31,703,472 | ) | | $(79,927,718 | ) | | (44,085,754 | ) | | $(138,958,043 | ) |
Class B | | (6,028,825 | ) | | (15,490,850 | ) | | (13,928,873 | ) | | (43,599,676 | ) |
Class C | | (1,823,768 | ) | | (4,643,446 | ) | | (7,050,980 | ) | | (21,687,544 | ) |
Class I | | (18,849,950 | ) | | (46,005,469 | ) | | (14,421,677 | ) | | (43,334,484 | ) |
Class R (b) | | — | | | — | | | (216,978 | ) | | (770,497 | ) |
Class R1 | | (56,046 | ) | | (138,585 | ) | | (143,291 | ) | | (478,327 | ) |
Former Class R2 (b) | | — | | | — | | | (204,368 | ) | | (726,540 | ) |
Class R2 | | (356,699 | ) | | (913,600 | ) | | (1,062,157 | ) | | (3,255,693 | ) |
Class R3 | | (679,447 | ) | | (1,688,538 | ) | | (648,871 | ) | | (1,987,964 | ) |
Class 529A | | (39,441 | ) | | (97,719 | ) | | (51,450 | ) | | (163,260 | ) |
Class 529B | | (16,245 | ) | | (41,364 | ) | | (21,238 | ) | | (64,126 | ) |
Class 529C | | (8,445 | ) | | (20,783 | ) | | (24,382 | ) | | (71,682 | ) |
| | (59,562,338 | ) | | $(148,968,072 | ) | | (81,860,019 | ) | | $(255,097,836 | ) |
55
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | | Year ended 1/31/09 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Net change | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 22,769,882 | | | $68,163,216 | | | 3,707,368 | | | $1,228,766 | |
Class B | | (3,687,771 | ) | | (9,393,482 | ) | | (10,604,107 | ) | | (33,763,357 | ) |
Class C | | 7,230,769 | | | 20,738,989 | | | (3,602,366 | ) | | (11,393,817 | ) |
Class I | | 12,432,988 | | | 29,855,729 | | | 2,632,049 | | | 5,118,135 | |
Class R (b) | | — | | | — | | | (205,787 | ) | | (731,387 | ) |
Class R1 | | 25,954 | | | 71,717 | | | 20,437 | | | 36,588 | |
Former Class R2 (b) | | — | | | — | | | (185,169 | ) | | (658,899 | ) |
Class R2 | | 21,605 | | | 62,987 | | | (160,469 | ) | | (270,310 | ) |
Class R3 | | (75,674 | ) | | (156,417 | ) | | 438,573 | | | 1,376,879 | |
Class R4 | | 25,880 | | | 61,143 | | | 1,532 | | | 4,620 | |
Class 529A | | 2,097 | | | 9,510 | | | (4,624 | ) | | (16,590 | ) |
Class 529B | | 10,543 | | | 26,956 | | | 13,757 | | | 48,990 | |
Class 529C | | 9,355 | | | 24,512 | | | (1,290 | ) | | 6,382 | |
| | 38,765,628 | | | $109,464,860 | | | (7,950,096 | ) | | $(39,014,000 | ) |
(b) | At the close of business on April 18, 2008, Class R and Class R2 shares converted into Class R3 shares. Following the conversion, Class R3 shares were renamed Class R2 shares. |
The fund is one of several mutual funds in which the MFS funds-of-funds may invest. The MFS funds-of-funds do not invest in the underlying MFS funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. At the end of the period, the MFS Growth Allocation Fund, MFS Moderate Allocation Fund, and MFS Conservative Allocation Fund were the owners of record of approximately 11%, 10%, and 4% respectively, of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund. In addition, the MFS Lifetime Retirement Income Fund, MFS Lifetime 2010 Fund, MFS Lifetime 2020 Fund, and MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund were each the owners of record of less than 1% of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund.
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed
56
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
upon spread. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $4,110 and $0, respectively, and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations.
(7) | | Transactions in Underlying Funds-Affiliated Issuers |
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
| | | | | | | | | |
Underlying Funds | | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | | | Ending Shares/Par Amount |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | 35,243,472 | | 203,522,796 | | (197,003,210 | ) | | 41,763,058 |
| | | | |
Underlying Funds | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | Capital Gain Distributions | | Dividend Income | | | Ending Value |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | $— | | $— | | $40,307 | | | $41,763,058 |
At close of business on July 24, 2009, the fund acquired all of the assets and liabilities of MFS Floating Rate High Income Fund. The acquisition was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of 24,291,334 shares of the fund (valued at $70,501,838) for all of the assets and liabilities of MFS Floating Rate High Income Fund. MFS Floating Rate High Income Fund then distributed the shares of the fund that MFS Floating Rate High Income Fund received from the fund to its shareholders. MFS Floating Rate High Income Fund’s net assets on that date were $70,501,838, including $3,902,584 of unrealized depreciation, $1,053,396 of accumulated net investment loss, and $37,019,074 of accumulated net realized loss on investments and foreign currency transactions. The aggregate net assets of the fund after the acquisition were $851,587,934.
57
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2009 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2008 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers,
58
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc., the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 4th quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 4th quintile for each of the one-year and five-year periods ended December 31, 2008 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results are likely to differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
59
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees expressed concern to MFS about the substandard investment performance of the Fund. In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year, as to MFS’ efforts to improve the Fund’s performance, including the replacement of the senior portfolio manager in 2008. In addition, the Trustees requested that they receive a separate update on the Fund’s performance at each of their regular meetings. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that MFS’ responses and efforts and plans to improve investment performance were sufficient to support approval of the continuance of the investment advisory agreement for an additional one year period, but that they would continue to closely monitor the performance of the Fund.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data, the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each lower than the Lipper expense group median.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is subject to a contractual breakpoint that reduces the Fund’s advisory fee rate on average daily net assets over $1.4 billion. The Trustees concluded that the existing breakpoint was sufficient to allow the Fund to benefit from economies of scale as its assets grow.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
60
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the entry into the industry of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Funds were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2009.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS will be available on or about November 1, 2009 by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
61
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and copies of this information may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
A shareholder can also obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com.
FURTHER INFORMATION
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
62
CONTACT US
Web site
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
Account service and literature
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Investment professionals
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
Mailing address
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
Overnight mail
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Save paper with eDelivery. MFS® will send you prospectuses, reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter. To sign up: 1. go to mfs.com. 2. log in via MFS® Access. 3. select eDelivery. If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS Access, and eDelivery may not be available to you.
MFS® Municipal High Income Fund
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ
NO BANK GUARANTEE
7/31/09
MMH-SEM
LETTER FROM THE CEO
Dear Shareholders:
In the fall of 2008, the markets took investors on what was perhaps the most tumultuous ride of their lives. Many are now debating when the market will stage a sustainable recovery, but not even the most experienced investor can provide a definitive answer to that question.
Even so, the basic rules of investing have not changed, and the turbulence reinforced the benefits of investing through the waves. Investors who jumped ship early on may have regretted their decisions when the markets gained some traction in the early half of this year. While anyone with a short-term horizon may have needed to take some action, most with longer-term goals probably found the best option was to stick with their long-term strategy.
At MFS® we believe investors are always best served by developing a plan with their investment professionals that addresses specific long-term needs. Most advisors agree that yearly reviews are important to monitor a plan’s progress. Most would also caution their clients against reacting too quickly to the daily news. When markets do recover, they often gain ground in quick, sudden bursts. If you are out of the market, you can easily miss the benefits of these rallies.
Few of us would again like to live through the kind of market turmoil we saw over the past year. But as turbulent as markets were, in our view, they proved that the fundamental principles of long-term investing still apply.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer
MFS Investment Management®
September 15, 2009
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio structure (i)
| | |
Top five industries (i) | | |
Healthcare Revenue — Hospitals | | 28.0% |
Universities - Colleges | | 9.6% |
Healthcare Revenue — Long-term Care | | 7.8% |
Tax Assessment | | 5.9% |
Tobacco | | 5.7% |
| | |
Credit quality of bonds (r) | | |
AAA | | 7.9% |
AA | | 14.0% |
A | | 10.6% |
BBB | | 30.9% |
BB | | 7.2% |
B | | 4.5% |
CCC | | 1.3% |
CC (o) | | 0.0% |
C | | 0.1% |
D | | 0.2% |
Not Rated | | 23.3% |
| |
Portfolio facts | | |
Average Duration (d)(i) | | 9.7 |
Average Effective Maturity (i)(m) | | 19.2 yrs. |
Average Credit Quality of Rated Securities (long-term) (a) | | BBB+ |
(a) | The average credit quality of rated securities is based upon a market weighted average of portfolio holdings that are rated by public rating agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the bond component includes accrued interest amounts and may be positively or negatively impacted by the equivalent exposure from any derivative holdings, if applicable. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
(r) | Each security is assigned a rating from Moody’s Investors Service. If not rated by Moody’s, the rating will be that assigned by Standard & Poor’s. Likewise, if not assigned a rating by Standard & Poor’s, it will be based on the rating assigned by Fitch, Inc. For those portfolios that hold a security which is not rated by any of the three agencies, the security is considered Not Rated. Holdings in U.S. Treasuries and government agency mortgage-backed securities, if any, are included in the “AAA”-rating category. Percentages are based on the total market value of investments as of 7/31/09. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 7/31/09, unless otherwise noted.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
2
EXPENSE TABLE
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period, February 1, 2009 through July 31, 2009
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period February 1, 2009 through July 31, 2009.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
3
Expense Table – continued
| | | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | | Beginning Account Value 2/01/09 | | Ending Account Value 7/31/09 | | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 2/01/09-7/31/09 |
A | | Actual | | 0.69% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,109.33 | | $3.61 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 0.69% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,021.37 | | $3.46 |
B | | Actual | | 1.46% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,105.13 | | $7.62 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.46% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,017.55 | | $7.30 |
C | | Actual | | 1.69% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,103.91 | | $8.82 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.69% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,016.41 | | $8.45 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid is equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
4
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
7/31/09 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - 99.6% | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Airport & Port Revenue - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Branson, MO, Regional Airport Transportation Development District Airport Rev., “B”, 6%, 2025 | | $ | 1,200,000 | | $ | 879,912 |
Branson, MO, Regional Airport Transportation Development District Airport Rev., “B”, 6%, 2037 | | | 300,000 | | | 203,667 |
Branson, MO, Regional Airport Transportation Development District Airport Rev., “B”, 6%, 2037 | | | 2,480,000 | | | 1,597,740 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 2,681,319 |
General Obligations - General Purpose - 2.3% | | | | | | |
Luzerne County, PA, FSA, 6.75%, 2023 | | $ | 1,230,000 | | $ | 1,254,403 |
State of California, 5%, 2034 | | | 4,375,000 | | | 4,068,531 |
State of California (Veterans), 5.05%, 2036 | | | 3,575,000 | | | 2,839,229 |
Texas Department of Transportation, 7%, 2012 | | | 86,875 | | | 87,133 |
Washington Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax, “B”, NATL, 5%, 2032 (u) | | | 25,010,000 | | | 25,400,406 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 33,649,702 |
General Obligations - Improvement - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Guam Government, “A”, 6.75%, 2029 | | $ | 1,110,000 | | $ | 1,109,845 |
Guam Government, “A”, 7%, 2039 | | | 1,270,000 | | | 1,269,810 |
Mississippi Development Bank Special Obligation (Greenville, MS Project), 5%, 2027 | | | 1,690,000 | | | 1,322,983 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,702,638 |
General Obligations - Schools - 2.0% | | | | | | |
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), 0%, 2031 | | $ | 2,060,000 | | $ | 618,124 |
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), 0%, 2032 | | | 2,095,000 | | | 580,692 |
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), 0%, 2033 | | | 4,185,000 | | | 1,079,270 |
Kane Kendall County, IL, Capital Appreciation, “E”, FGIC, 0%, 2023 | | | 5,945,000 | | | 2,884,395 |
Kane Kendall County, IL, Capital Appreciation, “E”, FGIC, 0%, 2025 | | | 6,000,000 | | | 2,565,840 |
Kane, Cook & DuPage Counties, IL, FSA, 6.375%, 2011 (c) | | | 1,255,000 | | | 1,355,538 |
Leander, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 0%, 2030 | | | 6,480,000 | | | 1,940,630 |
Leander, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 0%, 2035 | | | 10,120,000 | | | 2,211,119 |
Los Angeles, CA, Unified School District, “B”, AMBAC, 4.5%, 2031 | | | 7,000,000 | | | 6,134,940 |
Los Angeles, CA, Unified School District, “D”, 5%, 2034 | | | 755,000 | | | 718,201 |
5
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
General Obligations - Schools - continued | | | | | | |
Oceanside, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2024 | | $ | 3,110,000 | | $ | 1,329,649 |
Oceanside, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2027 | | | 2,070,000 | | | 703,552 |
Oceanside, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2029 | | | 4,025,000 | | | 1,160,408 |
Oceanside, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2030 | | | 4,455,000 | | | 1,177,813 |
Prosper, TX, Independent School District, Capital Appreciation, School Building, PSF, 0%, 2031 | | | 2,595,000 | | | 778,682 |
Royse City, TX, Independent School District, School Building, PSF, 0%, 2027 | | | 2,960,000 | | | 1,196,077 |
Royse City, TX, Independent School District, School Building, PSF, 0%, 2029 | | | 2,995,000 | | | 1,056,696 |
San Mateo County, CA, Community College District, “B”, NATL, 0%, 2032 | | | 10,000,000 | | | 2,447,000 |
Santa Clarita Community College District, CA, Election 2006, NATL, 0%, 2030 | | | 2,205,000 | | | 518,638 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 30,457,264 |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - 27.5% | | | | | | |
Alexander City, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority Medical Facilities Rev., “A” (Russell Hospital Corp.), 5.75%, 2036 | | $ | 1,900,000 | | $ | 1,296,655 |
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (West Penn Allegheny Health), 9.25%, 2010 (c) | | | 6,100,000 | | | 6,888,181 |
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (West Penn Allegheny Health), “A”, 5%, 2028 | | | 3,465,000 | | | 2,164,204 |
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (West Penn Allegheny Health), “A”, 5.375%, 2040 | | | 5,785,000 | | | 3,447,050 |
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (West Penn Allegheny Health), “B”, 9.25%, 2010 (c) | | | 3,360,000 | | | 3,794,146 |
Arkansas Development Finance Authority Rev. (Washington Regional Medical Center), 7.25%, 2010 (c) | | | 2,500,000 | | | 2,565,025 |
Atchison, KS, Hospital Rev. (Atchison Hospital Assn.), “A”, 6.75%, 2030 | | | 2,600,000 | | | 2,233,790 |
Athens County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (O’Bleness Memorial Hospital), “A”, 7.125%, 2033 | | | 2,500,000 | | | 1,983,125 |
Birmingham, AL, Baptist Medical Center, Special Care Facilities Rev. (Baptist Health Systems, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2030 | | | 8,730,000 | | | 6,592,023 |
Boone County, MO, Hospital Rev., (Boone Hospital Center), 5.375%, 2038 | | | 855,000 | | | 765,174 |
6
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | |
Boone County, MO, Hospital Rev., (Boone Hospital Center), 5.625%, 2038 | | $ | 1,060,000 | | $ | 990,199 |
Brookhaven, NY, Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Memorial Hospital Medical Center, Inc.), “A”, 8.25%, 2010 (c) | | | 2,500,000 | | | 2,754,525 |
Brunswick, GA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital), 5.625%, 2034 | | | 1,375,000 | | | 1,322,420 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Children’s Hospital), 5%, 2047 | | | 4,520,000 | | | 3,092,584 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Valleycare Health Systems), “A”, 5%, 2022 | | | 600,000 | | | 462,090 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Valleycare Health Systems), “A”, 5.125%, 2031 | | | 300,000 | | | 200,475 |
California Valley Health Systems, COP, 6.875%, 2023 (d) | | | 1,745,000 | | | 959,767 |
Chautauqua County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (Women’s Christian Assn.), “A”, 6.35%, 2017 | | | 920,000 | | | 871,194 |
Chautauqua County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (Women’s Christian Assn.), “A”, 6.4%, 2029 | | | 3,260,000 | | | 2,703,616 |
Chemung County, NY, Civic Facilities Rev. (St. Joseph’s Hospital-Elmira), “A”, 6%, 2013 | | | 1,100,000 | | | 880,715 |
Chemung County, NY, Civic Facilities Rev. (St. Joseph’s Hospital-Elmira), “B”, 6.35%, 2013 | | | 755,000 | | | 604,468 |
Chester County, PA, Health & Educational Facilities Rev. (Chester County Hospital), “A”, 6.75%, 2031 | | | 2,500,000 | | | 2,238,175 |
Citrus County, FL, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (Citrus Memorial Hospital), 6.25%, 2023 | | | 830,000 | | | 761,749 |
Clinton County, MO, Industrial Development Agency, Health Facilities Rev. (Cameron Regional Medical Center), 5%, 2032 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,339,060 |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Portercare Adventist Health Systems), 6.625%, 2011 (c) | | | 2,200,000 | | | 2,505,382 |
Crittenden County, AR, Hospital Rev., Refunding & Improvement, 7.15%, 2010 (c) | | | 1,165,000 | | | 1,242,170 |
Cuyahoga County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Canton, Inc.), 7.5%, 2030 | | | 5,020,000 | | | 4,881,850 |
Douglas County, NE, Hospital Authority Rev. (Methodist Health Partners), 5.75%, 2048 | | | 2,600,000 | | | 2,274,818 |
Fruita, CO, Rev. (Family Health West Project), 8%, 2043 | | | 4,440,000 | | | 4,232,075 |
Garden City, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Garden City Hospital), “A”, 4.875%, 2027 | | | 4,725,000 | | | 2,603,191 |
Gaylord, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Otsego Memorial Hospital), 6.2%, 2025 | | | 750,000 | | | 624,045 |
Gaylord, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Otsego Memorial Hospital), 6.5%, 2031 | | | 865,000 | | | 697,078 |
7
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | |
Genesee County, NY, Industrial Development Agency Civic Facility Rev. (United Memorial Medical Center), 5%, 2027 | | $ | 1,320,000 | | $ | 883,489 |
Glendale, AZ, Industrial Development Authority (John C. Lincoln Health), 5%, 2042 | | | 2,925,000 | | | 2,359,919 |
Grand Forks, ND, Health Care Authority Rev. (Altru Health Systems Obligated Group), 7.125%, 2010 (c) | | | 2,250,000 | | | 2,417,917 |
Harris County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Hospital Rev. (Memorial Hermann Healthcare Systems), “B”, 7.25%, 2035 | | | 2,400,000 | | | 2,577,864 |
Hillsborough County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (University Community Hospital), “A”, 5.625%, 2029 | | | 4,700,000 | | | 3,637,048 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Children’s Memorial Hospital), “A”, ASSD GTY, 5.25%, 2047 | | | 1,925,000 | | | 1,749,555 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Edward Hospital), “A”, AMBAC, 5.5%, 2040 | | | 2,185,000 | | | 1,838,197 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Kewanee Hospital), 5.1%, 2031 | | | 2,080,000 | | | 1,399,278 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (KishHealth Systems Obligated Group), 5.75%, 2028 | | | 3,770,000 | | | 3,601,292 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (O.S.F. Healthcare Systems) “A”, 7%, 2029 | | | 2,510,000 | | | 2,645,866 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (O.S.F. Healthcare Systems) “A”, 7.125%, 2037 | | | 2,555,000 | | | 2,685,867 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Provena Health), “A”, 7.75%, 2034 | | | 3,865,000 | | | 3,880,847 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers), 7%, 2044 | | | 2,545,000 | | | 2,470,686 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital), “A”, 5.5%, 2030 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 3,344,480 |
Indiana Finance Authority Rev. (Sisters of St. Francis Health Services), 5.375%, 2032 | | | 4,455,000 | | | 4,367,994 |
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Hospital Rev. (Clarion Hospital), “B”, 5%, 2033 | | | 2,510,000 | | | 2,106,241 |
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Hospital Rev. (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana), 5.5%, 2037 | | | 8,150,000 | | | 7,072,407 |
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Hospital Rev. (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana), “A”, 6.375%, 2011 (c) | | | 360,000 | | | 398,963 |
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Hospital Rev. (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana), “A”, 6.375%, 2011 (c) | | | 6,785,000 | | | 7,519,341 |
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Hospital Rev. (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana), “A”, 6.375%, 2021 | | | 2,940,000 | | | 2,982,542 |
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Hospital Rev. (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana), “A”, 6.375%, 2031 | | | 2,165,000 | | | 2,138,522 |
8
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | |
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Hospital Rev. (Riverview Hospital), 6.125%, 2031 | | $ | 3,750,000 | | $ | 3,384,450 |
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Clarian Health), “A”, 5%, 2039 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,636,200 |
Iron River, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Iron County Community Hospital, Inc.), 6.5%, 2033 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,653,560 |
Iron River, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Iron County Community Hospital, Inc.), 6.5%, 2040 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,614,400 |
Jacksonville, FL, Health Facilities Rev. (Brooks Health Systems), 5.25%, 2038 | | | 785,000 | | | 693,861 |
Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Mountain States Health), “A”, 5.5%, 2036 | | | 3,905,000 | | | 3,108,536 |
Joplin, MO, Industrial Development Authority Health Facilities Rev. (Freeman Health Systems), 5.5%, 2029 | | | 1,290,000 | | | 1,107,684 |
Joplin, MO, Industrial Development Authority Health Facilities Rev. (Freeman Health Systems), 5.75%, 2035 | | | 1,395,000 | | | 1,197,677 |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority (Norton Healthcare), “A”, 6.5%, 2010 (c) | | | 1,965,000 | | | 2,115,637 |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority (Norton Healthcare), “A”, 6.5%, 2020 | | | 3,035,000 | | | 3,089,448 |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority (Norton Healthcare), “A”, 6.625%, 2028 | | | 435,000 | | | 438,541 |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Baptist Healthcare System), “A”, 5.625%, 2027 | | | 815,000 | | | 848,252 |
Knox County, TN, Health, Educational, Hospital & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Baptist Health Systems), 6.5%, 2031 | | | 7,100,000 | | | 7,182,502 |
Knox County, TN, Health, Educational, Hospital & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Covenant Health), “A”, 0%, 2035 | | | 3,795,000 | | | 611,261 |
Knox County, TN, Health, Educational, Hospital & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (University Health Systems, Inc.), 5.25%, 2036 | | | 3,055,000 | | | 2,577,045 |
Lake County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Lake Hospital), “C”, 6%, 2043 | | | 2,870,000 | | | 2,634,947 |
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Lake Charles Memorial Hospital), 6.375%, 2034 | | | 5,575,000 | | | 4,556,057 |
Louisville & Jefferson County, KY, Metropolitan Government Healthcare Systems Rev. (Norton Healthcare, Inc.), 5.25%, 2036 | | | 7,485,000 | | | 6,471,606 |
Lufkin, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Memorial Health System), 5.5%, 2032 | | | 410,000 | | | 311,715 |
Lufkin, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Memorial Health System), 5.5%, 2037 | | | 5,400,000 | | | 3,991,734 |
Macomb County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Mount Clemens General Hospital), 5.875%, 2013 (c) | | | 4,345,000 | | | 5,131,662 |
9
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | |
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Mercy Medical Center), “A”, 5.5%, 2042 | | $ | 3,895,000 | | $ | 3,415,915 |
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Maryland Medical System), 6.75%, 2010 (c) | | | 1,000,000 | | | 1,064,540 |
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Washington County Hospital), 6%, 2043 | | | 985,000 | | | 882,639 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Boston Medical Center), 5.25%, 2038 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 3,185,160 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Caritas Christi), “A”, 5.7%, 2015 | | | 2,960,000 | | | 2,900,386 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Jordan Hospital), “D”, 5.25%, 2018 | | | 4,600,000 | | | 3,741,870 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Quincy Medical Center), “A”, 6.5%, 2038 | | | 2,305,000 | | | 1,698,670 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Saints Memorial Medical Center), “A”, 6%, 2023 | | | 5,665,000 | | | 4,110,751 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Massachusetts Memorial Hospital), “C”, 6.5%, 2021 | | | 500,000 | | | 505,295 |
Mecosta County, MI, General Hospital Rev., 6%, 2018 | | | 1,200,000 | | | 1,114,704 |
Miami Beach, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Mount Sinai Medical Center), 6.75%, 2029 | | | 2,490,000 | | | 1,885,677 |
Miami Beach, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Mount Sinai Medical Center), “A”, 6.7%, 2019 | | | 3,505,000 | | | 3,030,143 |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Memorial Healthcare Center), 5.875%, 2021 | | | 1,000,000 | | | 956,520 |
Monroe County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.), 5.375%, 2026 | | | 3,200,000 | | | 2,425,376 |
Monroe County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.), 5.5%, 2035 | | | 3,340,000 | | | 2,337,466 |
Monroe County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (Highland Hospital of Rochester), 5%, 2025 | | | 185,000 | | | 165,795 |
Montgomery, AL, Medical Clinic Board Health Care Facility Rev. (Jackson Hospital & Clinic), 5.25%, 2031 | | | 2,745,000 | | | 2,188,396 |
Montgomery, AL, Medical Clinic Board Health Care Facility Rev. (Jackson Hospital & Clinic), 5.25%, 2036 | | | 1,100,000 | | | 852,830 |
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Catholic Medical Center), “A”, 6.125%, 2012 (c) | | | 1,320,000 | | | 1,521,524 |
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Catholic Medical Center), “A”, 6.125%, 2032 | | | 180,000 | | | 157,700 |
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Covenant Health System), 6.5%, 2017 | | | 1,000,000 | | | 1,048,450 |
10
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | |
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Memorial Hospital at Conway), 5.25%, 2036 | | $ | 585,000 | | $ | 443,009 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (Palisades Medical Center), 6.625%, 2031 | | | 1,115,000 | | | 851,381 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (St. Barnabas Health) Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2036 | | | 4,305,000 | | | 400,623 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (St. Barnabas Health) Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2038 | | | 22,690,000 | | | 1,760,063 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (St. Joseph’s Healthcare System), 6.625%, 2038 | | | 8,000,000 | | | 6,774,480 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (St. Peter’s University Hospital), “A”, 6.875%, 2030 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 3,898,120 |
New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council, Hospital Rev. (Rehoboth McKinley Christian Hospital), “A”, 5%, 2017 | | | 500,000 | | | 415,165 |
New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council, Hospital Rev. (Rehoboth McKinley Christian Hospital), “A”, 5.25%, 2026 | | | 1,580,000 | | | 1,137,916 |
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center), LOC, 6.5%, 2030 | | | 1,570,000 | | | 1,661,327 |
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center), LOC, 6.25%, 2035 | | | 975,000 | | | 1,012,528 |
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (Staten Island University Hospital), “A”, 6.375%, 2031 | | | 470,000 | | | 392,873 |
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (Staten Island University Hospital), “B”, 6.375%, 2031 | | | 1,420,000 | | | 1,186,978 |
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (Staten Island University Hospital), “C”, 6.45%, 2032 | | | 900,000 | | | 756,099 |
Norman, OK, Regional Hospital Authority Rev., 5.375%, 2029 | | | 950,000 | | | 702,782 |
Norman, OK, Regional Hospital Authority Rev., 5.375%, 2036 | | | 6,240,000 | | | 4,369,560 |
Northampton County, PA, General Purpose Authority Hospital Rev. (St. Luke’s Hospital), “A”, 5.5%, 2035 | | | 920,000 | | | 799,029 |
Northampton County, PA, General Purpose Authority Hospital Rev. (St. Luke’s Hospital), “A”, 5.5%, 2040 | | | 1,075,000 | | | 918,459 |
Northern Hospital District, Surry County, NC, Health Care Facilities Rev., 6.25%, 2038 | | | 1,000,000 | | | 910,600 |
Ohio County, WV, County Commission Health System Rev. (Ohio Valley Medical Center), 5.75%, 2013 | | | 4,120,000 | | | 3,942,881 |
Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission Rev. (University Hospital Health System), 6.75%, 2039 | | | 5,390,000 | | | 5,495,105 |
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Rev. (Comanche County Hospital), “B”, 6.6%, 2031 | | | 4,080,000 | | | 3,744,828 |
Peninsula Ports Authority, VA, Hospital Facility Rev. (Whittaker Memorial), FHA, 8.7%, 2023 | | | 465,000 | | | 483,707 |
11
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | |
Philadelphia, PA, Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Temple University Health System), “A”, 6.625%, 2023 | | $ | 2,860,000 | | $ | 2,804,116 |
Philadelphia, PA, Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Temple University Health System), “A”, 5.5%, 2030 | | | 3,710,000 | | | 2,890,461 |
Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp., Hospital Financing (Lifespan Obligated Group), 6.5%, 2012 (c) | | | 4,000,000 | | | 4,614,280 |
Richmond, IN, Hospital Authority Rev. (Reid Hospital & Health Center Services), “A”, 6.625%, 2039 | | | 4,760,000 | | | 4,834,446 |
Royal Oak, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (William Beaumont Hospital), 8.25%, 2039 | | | 6,945,000 | | | 7,910,772 |
Royston, GA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Ty Cobb Healthcare Systems, Inc.), 6.375%, 2014 | | | 1,395,000 | | | 1,329,630 |
Royston, GA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Ty Cobb Healthcare Systems, Inc.), 6.5%, 2027 | | | 1,855,000 | | | 1,457,010 |
Salida, CO, Hospital District Rev., 5.25%, 2036 | | | 6,045,000 | | | 4,057,585 |
Scioto County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Southern Ohio Medical Center), 5.625%, 2031 | | | 1,370,000 | | | 1,277,580 |
Scioto County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Southern Ohio Medical Center), 5.75%, 2038 | | | 4,100,000 | | | 3,789,630 |
Shelby County, TN, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Methodist Healthcare), 6%, 2012 (c) | | | 450,000 | | | 511,884 |
Shelby County, TN, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Methodist Healthcare), 6%, 2012 (c) | | | 750,000 | | | 853,140 |
Shelby County, TN, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Methodist Healthcare), 6%, 2012 (c) | | | 745,000 | | | 847,452 |
Shelby County, TN, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Methodist Healthcare), 6%, 2012 (c) | | | 1,255,000 | | | 1,427,588 |
Shelby County, TN, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Methodist Healthcare), 6.25%, 2012 (c) | | | 750,000 | | | 858,758 |
Shelby County, TN, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Methodist Healthcare), 6.25%, 2012 (c) | | | 1,250,000 | | | 1,431,263 |
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 6%, 2023 | | | 795,000 | | | 754,678 |
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 5.5%, 2030 | | | 2,750,000 | | | 2,262,178 |
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 5.75%, 2032 | | | 2,545,000 | | | 2,143,195 |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Palmetto Health Alliance), 6.25%, 2031 | | | 2,725,000 | | | 2,424,896 |
Southwestern, IL, Development Authority Rev. (Anderson Hospital), 5.375%, 2015 | | | 885,000 | | | 847,865 |
12
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | |
Southwestern, IL, Development Authority Rev. (Anderson Hospital), 5.5%, 2020 | | $ | 1,805,000 | | $ | 1,641,900 |
Southwestern, IL, Development Authority Rev. (Anderson Hospital), 5.625%, 2029 | | | 1,330,000 | | | 1,142,231 |
Southwestern, IL, Development Authority Rev. (Anderson Hospital), 5.125%, 2036 | | | 2,580,000 | | | 1,986,290 |
St. Louis County, MO, Industrial Development Authority, Health Facilities Rev. (Ranken Jordan Project), 5%, 2027 | | | 1,350,000 | | | 892,188 |
St. Louis County, MO, Industrial Development Authority, Health Facilities Rev. (Ranken Jordan Project), 5%, 2035 | | | 1,300,000 | | | 788,840 |
St. Paul, MN, Housing & Redevelopment Hospital (Healthpartners Obligated Group), 5.25%, 2036 | | | 3,915,000 | | | 3,319,294 |
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Wellmont Health Systems Project), RADIAN, 5%, 2017 | | | 2,155,000 | | | 1,874,419 |
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Wellmont Health Systems Project), “C”, 5.25%, 2036 | | | 7,330,000 | | | 4,986,086 |
Sumner County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Sumner Regional Health), “A”, 5.5%, 2046 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 1,530,800 |
Tallahassee, FL, Health Facilities Rev. (Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Inc.), 6.25%, 2020 | | | 4,500,000 | | | 4,526,280 |
Tallahassee, FL, Health Facilities Rev. (Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Inc.), 6.375%, 2030 | | | 1,390,000 | | | 1,371,833 |
Texas Metro Health Facilities Development Corp., Metro Health Facilities Development Rev. (Wilson N. Jones Memorial Hospital), 7.2%, 2021 | | | 4,300,000 | | | 3,782,366 |
Texas Metro Health Facilities Development Corp., Metro Health Facilities Development Rev. (Wilson N. Jones Memorial Hospital), 7.25%, 2031 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,656,920 |
Tom Green County, TX, Health Facilities Rev. (Shannon Health System), 6.75%, 2021 | | | 3,150,000 | | | 3,199,644 |
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. (East Texas Medical Center), “A”, 5.25%, 2032 | | | 3,515,000 | | | 2,753,159 |
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. (East Texas Medical Center), “A”, 5.375%, 2037 | | | 2,885,000 | | | 2,246,896 |
Upper Illinois River Valley Development, Health Facilities Rev. (Morris Hospital), 6.625%, 2031 | | | 1,900,000 | | | 1,819,877 |
Valley, AL, Financing Authority Rev. (Lanier Memorial Hospital), 5.45%, 2011 | | | 905,000 | | | 889,018 |
Vigo County, IN, Hospital Authority Rev. (Union Hospital), 5.75%, 2042 | | | 780,000 | | | 552,653 |
13
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | |
Vigo County, IN, Hospital Authority Rev. (Union Hospital), 5.8%, 2047 | | $ | 3,750,000 | | $ | 2,636,475 |
Wapello County, IA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Ottumwa Regional Health Center), 6.25%, 2012 (c) | | | 2,000,000 | | | 2,292,340 |
Wapello County, IA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Ottumwa Regional Health Center), 6.375%, 2012 (c) | | | 2,595,000 | | | 2,984,276 |
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Central Washington Health Services), 6.75%, 2029 | | | 1,550,000 | | | 1,523,263 |
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Central Washington Health Services), 7%, 2039 | | | 3,665,000 | | | 3,614,973 |
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Highline Medical Center), FHA, 6.25%, 2036 | | | 5,695,000 | | | 5,868,470 |
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Mason Medical), “A”, 6.25%, 2042 | | | 5,075,000 | | | 4,418,853 |
Weirton, WV, Municipal Hospital Building, Commission Rev. (Weirton Hospital Medical Center), 6.375%, 2031 | | | 3,885,000 | | | 3,468,140 |
Weslaco, TX, Health Facilities Rev. (Knapp Medical Center), 6.25%, 2012 (c) | | | 4,000,000 | | | 4,485,200 |
West Contra Costa, CA, Healthcare District, AMBAC, 5.5%, 2029 | | | 700,000 | | | 676,151 |
West Plains, MO, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Ozarks Medical Center), 6.75%, 2024 | | | 810,000 | | | 725,420 |
West Shore, PA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Holy Spirit Hospital), 6.2%, 2026 | | | 4,500,000 | | | 4,164,075 |
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Thomas Health System), 6.5%, 2038 | | | 3,320,000 | | | 2,719,080 |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Aurora Health Care, Inc.), 6.875%, 2030 | | | 2,250,000 | | | 2,254,410 |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Aurora Health Care, Inc.), “B”, 5.625%, 2029 | | | 1,100,000 | | | 967,868 |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare), 5.25%, 2031 | | | 6,570,000 | | | 4,942,480 |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare), 5.25%, 2034 | | | 4,155,000 | | | 3,065,102 |
Yonkers, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (St. John’s Riverside Hospital), “B”, 6.8%, 2016 | | | 1,125,000 | | | 1,036,856 |
Yonkers, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (St. Joseph’s Hospital), “A”, 6.15%, 2015 | | | 1,800,000 | | | 753,660 |
Yonkers, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (St. Joseph’s Hospital), “C”, 6.2%, 2020 | | | 250,000 | | | 103,598 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 410,643,220 |
14
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - 7.6% | | | | | | |
Abilene, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Sears Methodist Retirement), “A”, 7%, 2033 | | $ | 1,155,000 | | $ | 870,627 |
Arizona Health Facilities Authority Rev. (The Terraces Project), 7.75%, 2013 (c) | | | 2,250,000 | | | 2,789,010 |
Bell County, TX, Health Facility Development Corp. (Advanced Living Technologies, Inc.), 8%, 2036 | | | 4,760,000 | | | 3,357,894 |
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Retirement Community Rev. (Ann’s Choice, Inc.), “A”, 6.125%, 2025 | | | 1,320,000 | | | 1,078,717 |
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Retirement Community Rev. (Ann’s Choice, Inc.), “A”, 6.25%, 2035 | | | 4,140,000 | | | 3,218,022 |
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lutheran Community Telford Center), 5.75%, 2027 | | | 620,000 | | | 462,377 |
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lutheran Community Telford Center), 5.75%, 2037 | | | 800,000 | | | 551,872 |
Cambria County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Beverly Enterprises, Inc.), ETM, 10%, 2012 (c) | | | 330,000 | | | 370,636 |
Chartiers Valley, PA, Industrial & Commercial Development Authority (Asbury Health Center Project), 5.75%, 2022 | | | 500,000 | | | 413,770 |
Chester County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (RHA Nursing Home), 8.5%, 2032 | | | 990,000 | | | 859,756 |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (American Baptist Homes), “A”, 5.9%, 2037 | | | 2,730,000 | | | 1,863,553 |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Christian Living Communities Project), “A”, 5.75%, 2037 | | | 3,355,000 | | | 2,421,035 |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), “B”, 6.125%, 2033 | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,267,755 |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Evangelical Lutheran), “A”, 6.125%, 2038 | | | 940,000 | | | 940,094 |
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority, Retirement Community Rev. (Wesley), “A”, 7.25%, 2013 (c) | | | 760,000 | | | 911,483 |
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority, Retirement Community Rev. (Wesley), “A”, 7.25%, 2013 (c) | | | 1,965,000 | | | 2,356,664 |
East Rochester, NY, Housing Authority Rev. (Woodland Village Project), 5.5%, 2033 | | | 600,000 | | | 409,704 |
Fulton County, GA, Residential Care Facilities (Canterbury Court), “A”, 6.125%, 2034 | | | 1,020,000 | | | 767,774 |
Fulton County, GA, Residential Care Facilities (Lenbrook Project), “A”, 5%, 2027 | | | 2,500,000 | | | 1,712,750 |
Fulton County, GA, Residential Care Facilities (Lenbrook Project), “A”, 5.125%, 2042 | | | 2,750,000 | | | 1,668,837 |
Georgia Medical Center Hospital Authority Rev. (Spring Harbor Green Island Project), 5.25%, 2037 | | | 4,510,000 | | | 3,114,335 |
15
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | | | | | | |
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Rev. (Kahala Nui Senior Living Community), 8%, 2033 | | $ | 1,500,000 | | $ | 1,454,535 |
HFDC of Central Texas, Inc., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Legacy at Willow Bend), “A”, 5.625%, 2026 | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,088,565 |
HFDC of Central Texas, Inc., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Legacy at Willow Bend), “A”, 5.75%, 2036 | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,004,595 |
Huntsville-Redstone Village, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority (Redstone Village Project), 5.5%, 2028 | | | 2,265,000 | | | 1,656,485 |
Huntsville-Redstone Village, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority (Redstone Village Project), 5.5%, 2043 | | | 1,560,000 | | | 1,028,898 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Clare at Water Tower), “A”, 6%, 2025 | | | 1,510,000 | | | 897,846 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), “A”, 5.5%, 2027 | | | 1,600,000 | | | 1,063,552 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), “A”, 5.5%, 2037 | | | 2,200,000 | | | 1,315,644 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Friendship Village), “A”, 5.375%, 2025 | | | 4,630,000 | | | 3,427,172 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Landing at Plymouth Place), “A”, 6%, 2037 | | | 1,510,000 | | | 1,060,382 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Montgomery Place), “A”, 5.75%, 2038 | | | 1,730,000 | | | 1,152,076 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev., Bond Anticipation Notes (Tallgrass), 13%, 2012 | | | 790,000 | | | 762,690 |
Iowa Finance Authority Senior Housing Authority Rev. (Bethany Life Communities), “A”, 5.55%, 2041 | | | 770,000 | | | 490,351 |
Iowa Finance Authority, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Care Initiatives), 9.25%, 2011 (c) | | | 3,705,000 | | | 4,334,109 |
Iowa Finance Authority, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Care Initiatives), “A”, 5.5%, 2025 | | | 2,495,000 | | | 1,894,828 |
Iowa Finance Authority, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Care Initiatives), “B”, 5.75%, 2018 | | | 2,330,000 | | | 2,042,198 |
James City County, VA, Economic Development (WindsorMeade Project), “A”, 5.4%, 2027 | | | 2,180,000 | | | 1,269,283 |
James City County, VA, Economic Development (WindsorMeade Project), “A”, 5.5%, 2037 | | | 2,710,000 | | | 1,422,967 |
Kalamazoo, MI, Economic Development Corp. Rev. (Heritage Community), 5.375%, 2027 | | | 750,000 | | | 530,535 |
Kalamazoo, MI, Economic Development Corp. Rev. (Heritage Community), 5.5%, 2036 | | | 2,200,000 | | | 1,442,452 |
Lenexa, KS, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Lakeview Village, Inc.), 5.375%, 2027 | | | 1,185,000 | | | 790,940 |
16
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | | | | | | |
Lenexa, KS, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Lakeview Village, Inc.), “C”, 6.875%, 2012 (c) | | $ | 1,250,000 | | $ | 1,454,912 |
Loves Park, IL (Hoosier Care), 7.125%, 2034 | | | 1,820,000 | | | 1,448,793 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Adventcare), “A”, 6.75%, 2037 | | | 4,640,000 | | | 3,486,728 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Linden Ponds, Inc.), “A”, 5.5%, 2027 | | | 1,235,000 | | | 826,795 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Linden Ponds, Inc.), “A”, 5.75%, 2035 | | | 310,000 | | | 197,228 |
Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency Rev. (GF/Revere, Inc.), 6.6%, 2025 | | | 6,215,000 | | | 5,025,698 |
Millbrae, CA, Residential Facilities Rev. (Magnolia of Millbrae), “A”, 7.375%, 2027 | | | 6,255,000 | | | 5,712,191 |
Montgomery County, PA, Higher Education & Health Authority Rev. (AHF/Montgomery), 6.875%, 2036 | | | 3,705,000 | | | 2,838,512 |
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Whitemarsh Continuing Care), 6.125%, 2028 | | | 750,000 | | | 483,293 |
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Whitemarsh Continuing Care), 6.25%, 2035 | | | 1,490,000 | | | 918,108 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Lions Gate), “A”, 5.875%, 2037 | | | 2,200,000 | | | 1,655,808 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Seabrook Village, Inc.), 5.25%, 2036 | | | 2,735,000 | | | 1,916,551 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (Cherry Hill), 8%, 2027 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 3,164,640 |
Norfolk, VA, Redevelopment & Housing Authority Rev. (Fort Norfolk Retirement Community), “A”, 6%, 2025 | | | 375,000 | | | 313,286 |
Norfolk, VA, Redevelopment & Housing Authority Rev. (Fort Norfolk Retirement Community), “A”, 6.125%, 2035 | | | 340,000 | | | 263,622 |
Olathe, KS, Senior Living Facilities Rev. (Catholic Care Campus, Inc.), “A”, 6%, 2038 | | | 1,700,000 | | | 1,246,270 |
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Orlando Lutheran Tower), 5.5%, 2038 | | | 1,180,000 | | | 754,516 |
Sarasota County, FL, Health Facility Authority Rev. (Sarasota Manatee), 5.75%, 2037 | | | 1,790,000 | | | 1,280,512 |
Sarasota County, FL, Health Facility Authority Rev. (Sarasota Manatee), 5.75%, 2045 | | | 395,000 | | | 273,925 |
Scott County, IA, Rev. (Ridgecrest Village), 5.25%, 2027 | | | 2,055,000 | | | 1,464,352 |
Shelby County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Germantown Village), “A”, 7.25%, 2034 | | | 2,470,000 | | | 2,005,788 |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev. (Woodlands at Furman), “A”, 6%, 2027 | | | 1,840,000 | | | 1,283,639 |
17
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | | | | | | |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev. (Woodlands at Furman), “A”, 6%, 2042 | | $ | 1,690,000 | | $ | 1,056,081 |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev., (Lutheran Homes of South Carolina), 5.5%, 2028 | | | 470,000 | | | 340,994 |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev., (Lutheran Homes of South Carolina), 5.625%, 2042 | | | 550,000 | | | 366,641 |
St. John’s County, FL, Industrial Development Authority (Bayview Project), “A”, 5.25%, 2041 | | | 2,800,000 | | | 1,673,392 |
St. Joseph County, IN, Economic Development Rev. (Holy Cross Village at Notre Dame), “A”, 6%, 2038 | | | 475,000 | | | 339,844 |
Sterling, IL (Hoosier Care), 7.125%, 2034 | | | 1,275,000 | | | 1,011,878 |
Suffolk County, NY, Industrial Development Agency (Medford Hamlet Assisted Living), 6.375%, 2039 | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,047,330 |
Travis County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Querencia Barton Creek), 5.5%, 2025 | | | 1,440,000 | | | 1,009,685 |
Ulster County, NY, Industrial Development Agency (Woodland Pond), “A”, 6%, 2037 | | | 3,925,000 | | | 2,762,258 |
Washington Housing Finance Commission Non-profit Rev. (Skyline at First Hill), “A”, 5.625%, 2027 | | | 785,000 | | | 565,514 |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (All Saints Assisted Living Project), 6%, 2037 | | | 1,230,000 | | | 837,778 |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (American Eagle Nursing Home), 7.15%, 2028 | | | 3,900,000 | | | 3,405,909 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 113,969,239 |
Human Services - 1.2% | | | | | | |
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority Community Provider Rev. (Boys & Girls Home of Alaska, Inc.), 5.875%, 2027 | | $ | 3,790,000 | | $ | 2,592,474 |
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority Community Provider Rev. (Boys & Girls Home of Alaska, Inc.), 6%, 2036 | | | 1,175,000 | | | 754,867 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority (Prides Industries), 7.125%, 2009 (c) | | | 1,025,000 | | | 1,050,604 |
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (CDF Healthcare), “A”, 7%, 2036 | | | 1,600,000 | | | 1,318,928 |
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (CDF Healthcare), “C”, 7%, 2036 | | | 1,270,000 | | | 1,046,899 |
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (Westside Rehab Center Project), “A”, 6.85%, 2036 | | | 3,415,000 | | | 2,662,129 |
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (Westside Rehab Center Project), “B”, 6.5%, 2013 | | | 85,000 | | | 84,878 |
18
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Human Services - continued | | | | | | |
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority (Wordsworth Academy), 8%, 2024 | | $ | 2,850,000 | | $ | 2,630,208 |
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program), 6.1%, 2012 | | | 635,000 | | | 605,117 |
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (GF/Orlando Healthcare Facilities), 8.875%, 2021 | | | 1,925,000 | | | 1,917,050 |
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (GF/Orlando Healthcare Facilities), 9%, 2031 | | | 2,185,000 | | | 2,100,200 |
Osceola County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Community Provider), 7.75%, 2017 | | | 497,000 | | | 480,490 |
Philadelphia, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev., 6.125%, 2019 | | | 1,250,000 | | | 756,725 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 18,000,569 |
Industrial Revenue - Airlines - 3.6% | | | | | | |
Alliance Airport Authority, TX (American Airlines, Inc.), 5.25%, 2029 | | $ | 4,265,000 | | $ | 1,497,484 |
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Special Facilities Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), 5.5%, 2030 | | | 4,470,000 | | | 1,788,313 |
Dallas Fort Worth, TX, International Airport Facility Improvement Corp. (American Airlines, Inc.), 5.5%, 2030 | | | 3,230,000 | | | 1,228,627 |
Denver, CO, City & County Airport Rev. (United Airlines), 5.25%, 2032 | | | 13,545,000 | | | 6,924,069 |
Denver, CO, City & County Airport Rev. (United Airlines), 5.75%, 2032 | | | 3,460,000 | | | 1,910,750 |
Houston, TX, Airport Systems Rev., Special Facilities (Continental, Inc.), “E”, 6.75%, 2029 | | | 5,045,000 | | | 3,792,629 |
Los Angeles, CA, Regional Airport Lease Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), “C”, 7%, 2012 | | | 1,700,000 | | | 1,553,205 |
Los Angeles, CA, Regional Airport Lease Rev. (AMR Corp.), “C”, 7.5%, 2024 | | | 5,450,000 | | | 4,216,283 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Rev. (Continental Airlines, Inc.), 6.25%, 2029 | | | 6,660,000 | | | 4,705,756 |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agencies Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), 5.4%, 2020 | | | 1,250,000 | | | 525,413 |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agencies Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), 7.625%, 2025 | | | 20,965,000 | | | 16,275,130 |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agencies Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), 7.75%, 2031 | | | 11,820,000 | | | 8,916,417 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 53,334,076 |
19
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Industrial Revenue - Chemicals - 0.9% | | | | | | |
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District (Dow Chemical Co.), “B-2”, 4.95%, 2033 | | $ | 300,000 | | $ | 244,374 |
Louisiana Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (Westlake Chemical), 6.75%, 2032 | | | 4,100,000 | | | 3,416,530 |
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Dow Chemical Co.), 6.25%, 2014 | | | 5,125,000 | | | 5,283,209 |
Red River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (Celanese Project) “B”, 6.7%, 2030 | | | 5,380,000 | | | 4,216,091 |
York County, SC, Industrial Rev. (Hoechst Celanese), 5.7%, 2024 | | | 130,000 | | | 103,180 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 13,263,384 |
Industrial Revenue - Environmental Services - 1.8% | | | | | | |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Browning Ferris, Inc.), “A”, 5.8%, 2016 | | $ | 5,000,000 | | $ | 4,900,450 |
Cobb County, GA, Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2033 | | | 2,780,000 | | | 2,236,760 |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority, Solid Waste Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), 5.7%, 2018 | | | 540,000 | | | 539,595 |
Director of the State of Nevada Department of Business & Industry Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), 5.625%, 2026 (b) | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,967,800 |
Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority (Waste Management, Inc.), 5.2%, 2028 | | | 3,260,000 | | | 2,794,863 |
Henrico County, VA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Browning Ferris, Inc.), 5.45%, 2014 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,985,240 |
Mission, TX, Economic Development Corp., Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Allied Waste N.A., Inc.), “A”, 5.2%, 2018 | | | 3,060,000 | | | 2,851,308 |
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), 5.2%, 2027 | | | 2,890,000 | | | 2,522,305 |
New Morgan, PA, Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (New Morgan Landfill Co., Inc./Browning Ferris, Inc.), 6.5%, 2019 | | | 2,500,000 | | | 2,500,325 |
Ohio Water Development Authority, Solid Waste Rev. (Allied Waste N.A. Inc.), “A”, 5.15%, 2015 | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,444,950 |
Yavapai County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), 4.9%, 2028 | | | 4,615,000 | | | 3,812,082 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 27,555,678 |
Industrial Revenue - Metals - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Burns Harbor, IN, Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Rev. (Bethlehem Steel), 8%, 2024 (d) | | $ | 10,455,000 | | $ | 1,045 |
Cambria County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Bethlehem Steel), 7.5%, 2015 (d) | | | 3,890,000 | | | 389 |
20
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Industrial Revenue - Metals - continued | | | | | | |
Jacksonville, FL, Economic Development Commission, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Gerdau Ameristeel U.S., Inc.), 5.3%, 2037 | | $ | 4,605,000 | | $ | 2,752,869 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 2,754,303 |
Industrial Revenue - Other - 2.3% | | | | | | |
Aztalan, WI, Exempt Facility Rev. (Renew Energy LLC), 7.5%, 2018 (d) | | $ | 2,955,000 | | $ | 44,325 |
Baker, FL, Correctional Development Corp. (Baker County Detention Center), 7.5%, 2030 | | | 1,560,000 | | | 1,328,714 |
Bayonne, NJ, Redevelopment Agency (Royal Caribbean Project), “A”, 5.375%, 2035 | | | 2,500,000 | | | 1,306,700 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Facilities (Microgy Holdings Project), 9%, 2038 | | | 800,000 | | | 668,936 |
Gulf Coast, TX, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Microgy Holdings LLC Project), 7%, 2036 | | | 2,060,000 | | | 858,505 |
Gulf Coast, TX, Waste Disposal Rev. (Valero Energy Corp.), 6.65%, 2032 | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,408,305 |
Janesville, WI, Industrial Development Rev. (Simmons Manufacturing Co.), 7%, 2017 | | | 3,900,000 | | | 3,701,763 |
Liberty, NY, Development Corp. Rev. (Goldman Sachs Headquarters), 5.25%, 2035 | | | 2,640,000 | | | 2,492,978 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (GMT Realty LLC), “B”, 6.875%, 2037 | | | 1,570,000 | | | 1,152,443 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (GMT Realty LLC), “C”, 6.5%, 2015 | | | 2,300,000 | | | 2,238,751 |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Rev., Liberty Bonds (IAC/InterActiveCorp), 5%, 2035 | | | 1,880,000 | | | 1,333,616 |
Park Creek Metropolitan District, CO, Rev. (Custodial Receipts), “CR-1”, 7.875%, 2032 (b)(n) | | | 4,215,000 | | | 4,217,698 |
Park Creek Metropolitan District, CO, Rev. (Custodial Receipts), “CR-2”, 7.875%, 2032 (b)(n) | | | 1,855,000 | | | 1,856,187 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Finance Authority Facilities Rev. (Amtrak), “A”, 6.25%, 2031 | | | 1,625,000 | | | 1,461,460 |
Philadelphia, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Host Marriott LP), 7.75%, 2017 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,828,080 |
St. John the Baptist Parish, LA (Marathon Oil Corp.), “A”, 5.125%, 2037 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 3,381,840 |
Texas Midwest Public Facilities Corp. Rev. (Secure Treatment Facilities Project), 9%, 2030 | | | 1,605,000 | | | 1,609,205 |
Tooele County, UT, Hazardous Waste Treatment Rev. (Union Pacific Corp.), 5.7%, 2026 | | | 3,130,000 | | | 2,984,455 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 33,873,961 |
21
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Industrial Revenue - Paper - 1.7% | | | | | | |
Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Industrial Facilities Rev. (Potlatch Corp.), “A”, 7.75%, 2025 | | $ | 1,200,000 | | $ | 1,067,628 |
Butler, AL, Industrial Development Board, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Georgia Pacific Corp.), 5.75%, 2028 | | | 4,010,000 | | | 2,923,811 |
Cass County, TX, Industrial Development Corp. (International Paper Co.), “A”, 4.625%, 2027 | | | 3,750,000 | | | 2,575,575 |
De Soto Parish, LA, Environmental Improvement Rev. (International Paper Co.), 6.35%, 2025 | | | 1,650,000 | | | 1,472,081 |
Delta County, MI, Economic Development Corp., Environmental Improvement Rev. (Mead Westvaco Escanaba), “A”, 6.25%, 2012 (c) | | | 3,100,000 | | | 3,512,889 |
Delta County, MI, Economic Development Corp., Environmental Improvement Rev. (Mead Westvaco Escanaba), “B”, 6.45%, 2012 (c) | | | 1,100,000 | | | 1,232,055 |
Effingham County, GA, Industrial Development Authority, Pollution Control (Georgia Pacific Corp. Project), 6.5%, 2031 | | | 1,360,000 | | | 1,155,769 |
Escambia County, FL, Environmental Improvement Rev. (International Paper Co.), “A”, 4.75%, 2030 | | | 1,940,000 | | | 1,289,634 |
Hodge, LA, Utilities Rev. (Stone Container Corp.), 7.45%, 2024 (d) | | | 5,950,000 | | | 3,272,500 |
Phenix City, AL, Industrial Development Board Environmental Improvement Rev., “A” (MeadWestvaco Coated Board Project), 6.35%, 2035 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 3,217,800 |
Rockdale County, GA, Development Authority Project Rev. (Visy Paper Project), “A”, 6.125%, 2034 | | | 2,835,000 | | | 2,054,156 |
Sabine River Authority Rev., Louisiana Water Facilities (International Paper Co.), 6.2%, 2025 | | | 2,250,000 | | | 1,972,620 |
West Point, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Chesapeake Corp.), “A”, 6.375%, 2019 (d) | | | 800,000 | | | 20,000 |
West Point, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Chesapeake Corp.), “B”, 6.25%, 2019 (d) | | | 6,830,000 | | | 170,750 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 25,937,268 |
Miscellaneous Revenue - Entertainment & Tourism - 0.7% | | | |
Mississippi Development Bank, Special Obligation (Diamond Lakes Utilities), 6.25%, 2017 | | $ | 2,600,000 | | $ | 2,321,020 |
New York Liberty Development Corp. Rev. (National Sports Museum), “A”, 6.125%, 2019 (d) | | | 1,157,197 | | | 3,472 |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Queens Baseball Stadium), ASSD GTY, 6.125%, 2029 | | | 280,000 | | | 304,486 |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Queens Baseball Stadium), ASSD GTY, 6.375%, 2039 | | | 210,000 | | | 223,656 |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Queens Baseball Stadium), ASSD GTY, 6.5%, 2046 | | | 830,000 | | | 885,237 |
22
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Miscellaneous Revenue - Entertainment & Tourism - continued | | | |
Seminole Tribe, FL, Special Obligation Rev., “A”, 5.75%, 2022 (n) | | $ | 4,150,000 | | $ | 3,877,138 |
Seminole Tribe, FL, Special Obligation Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2027 (n) | | | 1,840,000 | | | 1,570,587 |
Seneca Nation Indians, NY, Capital Improvements Authority, Special Obligation, 5%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,555,000 | | | 1,155,925 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 10,341,521 |
Miscellaneous Revenue - Other - 1.8% | | | | | | |
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, 6.7%, 2011 (c) | | $ | 2,000,000 | | $ | 2,170,780 |
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2017 | | | 845,000 | | | 765,604 |
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2024 | | | 3,020,000 | | | 2,432,036 |
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5%, 2034 | | | 265,000 | | | 181,528 |
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “B”, 5.75%, 2034 | | | 2,705,000 | | | 1,933,696 |
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH, Port Authority Rev. (Columbia National Group), 5%, 2020 | | | 1,390,000 | | | 1,094,959 |
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH, Port Authority Rev. (Fairmount), “B”, LOC, 5.125%, 2025 | | | 520,000 | | | 414,164 |
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH, Port Authority Rev. (Perrysburg Project), 4.8%, 2035 | | | 795,000 | | | 529,438 |
Hardeman County, TN, Correctional Facilities Rev., 7.75%, 2017 | | | 4,945,000 | | | 4,898,715 |
Madison County, FL, Rev. (Twin Oaks Project), “A”, 6%, 2025 | | | 1,525,000 | | | 1,140,792 |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Kapkowski Project), “B”, 6.5%, 2018 | | | 3,540,000 | | | 3,287,350 |
Riversouth, OH, Authority Rev. (Lazarus Building) “A”, 5.75%, 2027 | | | 3,975,000 | | | 3,263,793 |
Southwestern Illinois Development Authority Rev., Solid Waste Disposal Rev., 5.9%, 2014 | | | 1,265,000 | | | 1,242,572 |
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Seville Project), “A”, 5.1%, 2025 | | | 600,000 | | | 434,550 |
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Twinsburg Township), “D”, 5.125%, 2025 | | | 440,000 | | | 319,766 |
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Workforce Policy Board), “F”, 4.875%, 2025 | | | 2,655,000 | | | 1,824,091 |
Toledo Lucas County, OH, Port Authority Development Rev. (Northwest Ohio Bond Fund), “B”, 4.8%, 2035 | | | 910,000 | | | 520,202 |
Toledo-Lucas County, OH, Port Authority Development Rev. (Northwest Ohio Bond Fund), “C”, 5.125%, 2025 | | | 260,000 | | | 177,770 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 26,631,806 |
23
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Multi-Family Housing Revenue - 1.0% | | | | | | |
Bay County, FL, Housing Finance Authority, Multi-Family Rev. (Andrews Place II Apartments), FSA, 5%, 2035 | | $ | 635,000 | | $ | 578,898 |
Bay County, FL, Housing Finance Authority, Multi-Family Rev. (Andrews Place II Apartments), FSA, 5.1%, 2046 | | | 1,155,000 | | | 1,036,659 |
Fairfax County, VA, Economic Development Authority, Senior Living (Lewinsville Retirement Village), “A”, 5.25%, 2032 | | | 1,215,000 | | | 824,025 |
Indianapolis, IN, Multi-Family Rev. (Cambridge Station Apartments II), FNMA, 5.25%, 2039 (b) | | | 1,345,000 | | | 1,332,397 |
Mississippi Home Corp., Rev. (Kirkwood Apartments), 6.8%, 2037 | | | 3,850,000 | | | 2,615,113 |
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 7.5%, 2049 (z) | | | 6,000,000 | | | 4,792,860 |
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.4%, 2049 (z) | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,158,600 |
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.9%, 2049 (z) | | | 2,000,000 | | | 898,440 |
North Charleston, SC, Housing Authority Rev. (Horizon Village), “A”, GNMA, 5.15%, 2048 | | | 1,380,000 | | | 1,266,647 |
Seattle, WA, Housing Authority Rev., Capped Fund Program (High Rise Rehab), “I”, FSA, 5%, 2025 | | | 1,000,000 | | | 962,240 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 15,465,879 |
Sales & Excise Tax Revenue - 1.1% | | | | | | |
Central, WA, Puget Sound Regional Transportation Authority, “A”, 5%, 2036 | | $ | 10,000,000 | | $ | 10,059,600 |
Desloge, MO, Tax Increment Rev. (U.S. Highway 67 Street Redevelopment), 5.2%, 2020 | | | 855,000 | | | 739,806 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Rev., “A-1”, 5.25%, 2029 | | | 3,150,000 | | | 3,480,341 |
Utah Transit Authority Sales Tax Rev., “A”, NATL, 0%, 2028 | | | 6,825,000 | | | 2,079,782 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 16,359,529 |
Single Family Housing - Local - 0.6% | | | | | | |
Chicago, IL, Single Family Mortgage Rev., “C”, GNMA, 7.05%, 2030 | | $ | 20,000 | | $ | 20,213 |
Cook County, IL, Single Family Mortgage Rev., “A”, 0%, 2015 | | | 40,000 | | | 12,284 |
Corpus Christi, TX, Housing Finance Authority Rev., “B”, 0%, 2011 | | | 1,170,000 | | | 743,652 |
Escambia County, FL, Single Family Mortgage Rev., GNMA, 6.95%, 2024 | | | 150,000 | | | 154,416 |
Jefferson County, TX, Housing Finance Corp., NATL, 0%, 2015 | | | 450,000 | | | 232,501 |
Jefferson Parish, LA, Single Family Mortgage Rev., “B-1”, GNMA, 6.625%, 2023 | | | 335,000 | | | 349,050 |
Jefferson Parish, LA, Single Family Mortgage Rev., “D-1”, GNMA, 7.5%, 2026 | | | 50,000 | | | 52,268 |
Nortex, TX, Housing Finance Corp., Single Family Mortgage Rev., “B”, 5.5%, 2038 | | | 120,000 | | | 88,954 |
24
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Single Family Housing - Local - continued | | | | | | |
Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Rev., “B-1”, GNMA, 7.05%, 2030 | | $ | 165,000 | | $ | 176,142 |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A”, GNMA, 6.45%, 2029 | | | 200,000 | | | 204,244 |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A”, GNMA, 5.9%, 2035 | | | 790,000 | | | 794,061 |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A”, GNMA, 6.25%, 2035 | | | 345,000 | | | 367,259 |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-1”, GNMA, 5.75%, 2037 | | | 265,000 | | | 275,897 |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-2”, GNMA, 5.75%, 2037 | | | 980,000 | | | 1,005,196 |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-3”, GNMA, 6%, 2035 | | | 575,000 | | | 579,876 |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-4”, GNMA, 5.625%, 2036 | | | 725,000 | | | 730,496 |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-4”, GNMA, 5.85%, 2037 | | | 1,395,000 | | | 1,412,159 |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-5”, GNMA, 5.9%, 2037 | | | 485,000 | | | 495,772 |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “B-2”, GNMA, 6.45%, 2033 | | | 615,000 | | | 649,963 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 8,344,403 |
Single Family Housing - State - 1.1% | | | | | | |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “B-2”, 6.1%, 2023 | | $ | 235,000 | | $ | 236,459 |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “B-3”, 6.55%, 2025 | | | 22,000 | | | 22,044 |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “B-3”, 6.55%, 2033 | | | 255,000 | | | 270,346 |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “C-2”, 5.9%, 2023 | | | 395,000 | | | 395,363 |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “C-2”, FHA, 6.6%, 2032 | | | 385,000 | | | 405,147 |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “C-3”, 6.75%, 2021 | | | 115,000 | | | 120,403 |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “C-3”, 7.15%, 2030 | | | 55,000 | | | 55,641 |
Iowa Finance Authority Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Mortgage Backed Securities), “A”, GNMA, 5%, 2028 | | | 1,095,000 | | | 1,096,577 |
Iowa Finance Authority Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Mortgage Backed Securities), “A”, GNMA, 5.3%, 2033 | | | 775,000 | | | 776,093 |
Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, Single Family Mortgage Rev., “B-2”, GNMA, 7.55%, 2031 | | | 65,000 | | | 66,212 |
Mississippi Home Corp., Single Family Rev., “A”, GNMA, 6.1%, 2034 | | | 1,695,000 | | | 1,713,798 |
Mississippi Home Corp., Single Family Rev., “A-2”, GNMA, 6.5%, 2032 | | | 1,555,000 | | | 1,608,072 |
25
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Single Family Housing - State - continued | | | | | | |
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), GNMA, 7.45%, 2031 | | $ | 75,000 | | $ | 77,272 |
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), GNMA, 6.35%, 2032 | | | 265,000 | | | 267,507 |
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), GNMA, 6.85%, 2032 | | | 230,000 | | | 234,648 |
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), GNMA, 6.75%, 2034 | | | 230,000 | | | 239,064 |
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), “B”, GNMA, 6.7%, 2030 | | | 410,000 | | | 412,280 |
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), “B”, GNMA, 6.05%, 2037 | | | 2,710,000 | | | 2,756,937 |
New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority Rev., “B”, 5.875%, 2030 | | | 205,000 | | | 205,342 |
New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority Rev., “B”, 6.3%, 2031 | | | 180,000 | | | 181,386 |
New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority Rev., “B”, 6.5%, 2035 | | | 1,520,000 | | | 1,554,215 |
New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority Rev., “B-2”, GNMA, 6.35%, 2033 | | | 415,000 | | | 422,283 |
North Dakota Housing Finance Agency Rev., Housing Finance, “A”, 5%, 2033 | | | 355,000 | | | 355,387 |
Oklahoma Housing Finance Agency, Single Family, 7.55%, 2028 | | | 195,000 | | | 206,916 |
Texas Affordable Housing Corp. (Single Family Mortgage), “B”, GNMA, 5.25%, 2039 | | | 2,255,000 | | | 2,182,096 |
Texas Housing & Community Affairs, Residential Mortgage Rev., GNMA, 7.1%, 2021 | | | 1,150,000 | | | 1,227,579 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 17,089,067 |
Solid Waste Revenue - 0.7% | | | | | | |
Delaware County, PA, Industrial Development Authority, Resource Recovery Facilities Rev. (American Ref-Fuel Co.), “A”, 6.2%, 2019 | | $ | 3,900,000 | | $ | 3,826,368 |
Hudson County, NJ, Solid Waste System Rev., 6%, 2019 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,822,600 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Rev. (Ogden Haverhill Associates), “A”, 5.6%, 2019 | | | 5,425,000 | | | 4,682,209 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 10,331,177 |
State & Agency - Other - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Mepsi Campus), “A”, 6.25%, 2024 | | $ | 900,000 | | $ | 781,443 |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Mepsi Campus), “A”, 6.5%, 2037 | | | 3,600,000 | | | 2,947,536 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,728,979 |
State & Local Agencies - 1.8% | | | | | | |
Delaware Valley, PA, Regional Finance Authority, AMBAC, 5.5%, 2018 | | $ | 200,000 | | $ | 216,342 |
26
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
State & Local Agencies - continued | | | | | | |
Delaware Valley, PA, Regional Finance Authority, AMBAC, 5.5%, 2018 | | $ | 1,485,000 | | $ | 1,606,339 |
Delaware Valley, PA, Regional Finance Authority, “B”, FRN, AMBAC, 5.5%, 2018 | | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 |
Delaware Valley, PA, Regional Finance Authority, RITES, AMBAC, 10.575%, 2018 (p) | | | 150,000 | | | 174,513 |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., “A”, AMBAC, 5%, 2020 | | | 250,000 | | | 237,615 |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., “A-1”, AMBAC, 0% to 2010, 4.6% to 2023 | | | 1,185,000 | | | 938,733 |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “A”, FGIC, 5%, 2035 | | | 1,000,000 | | | 864,990 |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “A”, FGIC, 5%, 2038 | | | 7,540,000 | | | 6,299,444 |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “A”, 5%, 2045 | | | 8,795,000 | | | 7,133,624 |
Harris County, TX, 5.8%, 2014 | | | 840,987 | | | 808,349 |
Harris County, TX, 5.625%, 2020 | | | 1,968,828 | | | 1,788,306 |
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, “A”, 5.125%, 2029 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 3,992,480 |
Northumberland County, PA (County Careers & Arts Center), 6.65%, 2020 | | | 980,000 | | | 945,671 |
Northumberland County, PA (Mountain View Manor), 7%, 2010 (c) | | | 1,000,000 | | | 1,073,700 |
Philadelphia, PA, Municipal Authority Rev., 6.5%, 2034 | | | 1,060,000 | | | 1,085,822 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 27,215,928 |
Student Loan Revenue - 0.6% | | | | | | |
Access to Loans for Learning, CA, Student Loan Rev., 7.95%, 2030 | | $ | 2,700,000 | | $ | 2,446,443 |
Arizona Student Loan Acquisition Authority, Student Loan Rev., 6.15%, 2029 | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,489,830 |
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev., “H”, ASSD GTY, 6.35%, 2030 | | | 4,965,000 | | | 5,031,978 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 8,968,251 |
Tax - Other - 0.5% | | | | | | |
Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority Rev., NATL, 0%, 2032 | | $ | 6,310,000 | | $ | 1,005,877 |
New York, NY, City Transitional Finance Authority Building Aid Rev., “S-3”, 5.25%, 2039 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 3,976,120 |
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev. (Diageo Project), “A”, 6.75%, 2037 | | | 1,590,000 | | | 1,593,275 |
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev., “E”, 5.875%, 2018 | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,448,940 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 8,024,212 |
27
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Tax Assessment - 5.8% | | | | | | |
Altoona, IA, Urban Renewal Tax Increment Rev., 6%, 2043 | | $ | 3,000,000 | | $ | 2,886,510 |
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 5.25%, 2016 | | | 440,000 | | | 340,481 |
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev. (Centex Homes Project), “A-1”, 5.5%, 2036 | | | 1,450,000 | | | 745,547 |
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev. (Master Infrastructure Projects), “A”, 5.35%, 2036 | | | 1,810,000 | | | 950,232 |
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment (Master Infrastructure Projects), “B”, 5.1%, 2014 | | | 650,000 | | | 460,688 |
Atlanta, GA, Tax Allocation (Eastside Project), “B”, 5.6%, 2030 | | | 2,450,000 | | | 1,916,464 |
Atlanta, GA, Tax Allocation (Princeton Lakes Project), 5.5%, 2031 | | | 1,515,000 | | | 1,116,222 |
Ave Maria Stewardship Community District, FL, “A”, 5.125%, 2038 | | | 2,025,000 | | | 1,023,354 |
Baltimore, MD, Special Obligation, “A”, 7%, 2038 | | | 2,600,000 | | | 2,167,360 |
Belmont Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., “B”, 5.125%, 2014 (d) | | | 2,950,000 | | | 728,325 |
Capital Region Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., “A”, 7%, 2039 | | | 1,875,000 | | | 1,325,925 |
Capital Region Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., “A-2”, 6.85%, 2031 | | | 685,000 | | | 596,738 |
Century Gardens Village Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.1%, 2037 | | | 970,000 | | | 502,421 |
Concord Station Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5%, 2015 | | | 650,000 | | | 472,738 |
Concorde Estates, FL, Community Development District, “B”, 5%, 2011 | | | 385,000 | | | 242,900 |
Creekside Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.2%, 2038 | | | 2,600,000 | | | 1,244,386 |
Dardenne, MO, Town Square Transportation Development District, “A”, 5%, 2026 | | | 2,725,000 | | | 1,473,816 |
Du Page County, IL, Special Service Area No. 31 Special Tax (Monarch Landing Project), 5.625%, 2036 | | | 945,000 | | | 595,945 |
Durbin Crossing Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B-1”, 4.875%, 2010 | | | 3,405,000 | | | 2,375,737 |
Enclave at Black Point Marina Community Development District, FL, “B”, 5.2%, 2014 | | | 1,785,000 | | | 970,058 |
Fishhawk Community Development District, FL, 5.125%, 2009 | | | 955,000 | | | 852,471 |
Grand Bay at Doral Community Development District, FL, “A”, 6%, 2039 | | | 620,000 | | | 328,085 |
Grand Bay at Doral Community Development District, FL, “B”, 6%, 2017 | | | 3,685,000 | | | 2,593,061 |
28
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Tax Assessment - continued | | | | | | |
Greyhawk Landing Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 7%, 2012 | | $ | 70,000 | | $ | 67,460 |
Hawks Point Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A”, 5.3%, 2039 | | | 1,430,000 | | | 753,839 |
Heritage Harbour North Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 6.375%, 2038 | | | 2,040,000 | | | 1,278,019 |
Katy, TX, Development Authority Rev., “B”, 6%, 2018 | | | 4,600,000 | | | 3,872,786 |
Killarney Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5.125%, 2010 (a) | | | 640,000 | | | 384,000 |
Lakeshore Villages Master Community Development District, LA, Special Assessment, 5.25%, 2017 | | | 2,862,000 | | | 2,216,132 |
Lancaster County, SC, Assessment Rev. (Sun City Carolina Lakes), 5.45%, 2037 | | | 1,810,000 | | | 1,094,959 |
Landmark At Doral Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5.2%, 2015 (d) | | | 2,000,000 | | | 819,300 |
Legends Bay Community Development District, FL, “A”, 5.5%, 2014 | | | 1,580,000 | | | 797,995 |
Legends Bay Community Development District, FL, “A”, 5.875%, 2038 | | | 1,370,000 | | | 686,356 |
Magnolia Park Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A”, 6.15%, 2039 | | | 4,150,000 | | | 2,507,015 |
Main Street Community Development District, FL, “A”, 6.8%, 2038 | | | 1,895,000 | | | 1,397,752 |
Main Street Community Development District, FL, “B”, 6.9%, 2017 | | | 1,495,000 | | | 1,303,550 |
Middle Village Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A”, 5.8%, 2022 | | | 765,000 | | | 583,412 |
Morgantown, WV, Tax Increment Rev., Parking Garage Project, “A”, 4.8%, 2026 | | | 1,215,000 | | | 777,564 |
Morgantown, WV, Tax Increment Rev., Parking Garage Project, “A”, 5%, 2033 | | | 500,000 | | | 298,780 |
Naturewalk Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., “B”, 5.3%, 2016 | | | 2,300,000 | | | 1,265,276 |
New Port Tampa Bay Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5.3%, 2012 | | | 1,360,000 | | | 475,864 |
North Springs Improvement District, FL, Special Assessment (Parkland Golf Country Club), “B-1”, 5.125%, 2015 | | | 1,170,000 | | | 883,327 |
North Springs Improvement District, FL, Special Assessment (Parkland Golf Country Club), “B-2”, 5.125%, 2015 | | | 215,000 | | | 162,327 |
Ohio County, WV, Commission Tax Increment Rev. (Fort Henry Centre), “A”, 5.85%, 2034 | | | 865,000 | | | 637,055 |
Old Palm Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment (Palm Beach Gardens), “A”, 5.9%, 2035 | | | 700,000 | | | 383,271 |
Old Palm Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment (Palm Beach Gardens), “B”, 5.375%, 2014 | | | 740,000 | | | 596,033 |
29
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Tax Assessment - continued | | | | | | |
Osage Beach, MO, Tax Increment Rev. (Prewitts), 4.8%, 2016 | | $ | 1,675,000 | | $ | 1,364,740 |
Osage Beach, MO, Tax Increment Rev. (Prewitts), 5%, 2023 | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,035,675 |
OTC Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A”, 5.3%, 2038 | | | 3,945,000 | | | 2,188,923 |
Overland Park, KS, Special Assessment (Tallgrass Creek), 4.85%, 2016 | | | 565,000 | | | 467,560 |
Overland Park, KS, Special Assessment (Tallgrass Creek), 5.125%, 2028 | | | 1,220,000 | | | 811,507 |
Palm Glades Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A”, 5.3%, 2036 | | | 1,005,000 | | | 563,775 |
Palm River, FL, Community Development District, Special Assessment Rev., “A”, 5.375%, 2036 (q) | | | 895,000 | | | 402,741 |
Palm River, FL, Community Development District, Special Assessment Rev., “B”, 5.15%, 2013 (a) | | | 1,000,000 | | | 320,000 |
Panther Trace II, Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.125%, 2013 | | | 1,115,000 | | | 655,553 |
Panther Trace II, Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5%, 2010 | | | 995,000 | | | 867,670 |
Parker Road Community Development District, FL, “A”, 5.6%, 2038 | | | 1,240,000 | | | 654,745 |
Parkway Center Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5.625%, 2014 | | | 3,020,000 | | | 2,373,992 |
Paseo, FL, Community Development District Capital Improvement Rev., “B”, 4.875%, 2010 (a) | | | 2,625,000 | | | 1,444,301 |
Prince George’s County, MD, Special Obligation (National Harbor Project), 5.2%, 2034 | | | 755,000 | | | 519,032 |
Riverwood Estates Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5%, 2013 (d) | | | 4,405,000 | | | 1,101,250 |
Rolling Hills Community Development District, FL, “B”, 5.125%, 2013 | | | 485,000 | | | 344,015 |
Sarasota National Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment Rev., 5.3%, 2039 | | | 3,215,000 | | | 1,652,092 |
Six Mile Creek Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 5.875%, 2038 | | | 5,000,000 | | | 2,204,100 |
Sterling Hill Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.5%, 2010 | | | 610,000 | | | 555,539 |
Stone Ridge, CO, Metropolitan District No. 2, 7.25%, 2031 | | | 2,700,000 | | | 1,955,934 |
Stonebrier Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.5%, 2037 | | | 1,795,000 | | | 1,012,811 |
Stoneybrook South Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A”, 5.8%, 2039 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 998,360 |
Stoneybrook South Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5.45%, 2015 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,002,380 |
30
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Tax Assessment - continued | | | | | | |
Sweetwater Creek Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 5.3%, 2017 | | $ | 2,000,000 | | $ | 1,276,480 |
Sweetwater Creek Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 5.5%, 2038 | | | 1,500,000 | | | 838,860 |
Tolomato Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 6.65%, 2040 | | | 3,825,000 | | | 2,552,996 |
Tuscany Reserve Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5.25%, 2016 | | | 2,540,000 | | | 1,665,529 |
Two Creeks Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 5.25%, 2037 | | | 2,115,000 | | | 1,053,439 |
Villa Portofino East Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.2%, 2037 | | | 2,170,000 | | | 1,328,734 |
Villa Portofino West Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A”, 5.35%, 2036 | | | 940,000 | | | 588,365 |
Villa Vizcaya Community Development District, FL, “A”, 5.55%, 2039 | | | 790,000 | | | 418,218 |
Washington County, PA, Redevelopment Authority (Victory Centre Project), “A”, 5.45%, 2035 | | | 625,000 | | | 376,988 |
Watergrass Community Development District, FL, “A”, 5.375%, 2039 | | | 1,580,000 | | | 810,619 |
Watergrass Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 4.875%, 2010 | | | 1,970,000 | | | 1,197,130 |
Wentworth Estates Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5.125%, 2012 | | | 1,090,000 | | | 579,924 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 86,335,513 |
Tobacco - 5.7% | | | | | | |
Badger, WI, Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., 6.125%, 2012 (c) | | $ | 7,250,000 | | $ | 7,938,315 |
Badger, WI, Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., 6.375%, 2012 (c) | | | 495,000 | | | 560,543 |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 5.125%, 2024 | | | 2,795,000 | | | 2,290,167 |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 5.875%, 2030 | | | 21,515,000 | | | 14,979,388 |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, ”A-2”, 5.75%, 2034 | | | 2,500,000 | | | 1,599,900 |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 6%, 2042 | | | 780,000 | | | 463,008 |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 5.875%, 2047 | | | 6,835,000 | | | 3,915,703 |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 6.5%, 2047 | | | 9,130,000 | | | 5,767,147 |
California County, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement, L.A. County, “A”, 0% to 2010, 5.65% to 2041 | | | 1,525,000 | | | 781,669 |
31
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Tobacco - continued | | | | | | |
California Statewide Financing Authority, Tobacco Settlement, 5.625%, 2029 | | $ | 3,785,000 | | $ | 2,834,435 |
District of Columbia, Tobacco Settlement, 6.25%, 2024 | | | 2,880,000 | | | 2,729,808 |
District of Columbia, Tobacco Settlement, 6.75%, 2040 | | | 885,000 | | | 673,565 |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., “A-4”, 7.8%, 2013 (c) | | | 3,000,000 | | | 3,660,630 |
Inland Empire, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Asset Backed, “C-1”, 0%, 2036 | | | 11,775,000 | | | 833,081 |
Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority, Tobacco Settlement Rev., Asset Backed, “B”, 5.6%, 2034 | | | 4,295,000 | | | 2,945,597 |
Louisiana Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., “2001-B”, 5.5%, 2030 | | | 4,915,000 | | | 4,781,410 |
Louisiana Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., “2001-B”, 5.875%, 2039 | | | 6,940,000 | | | 5,493,010 |
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority Rev., Asset Backed, “A”, 6%, 2048 | | | 11,470,000 | | | 7,077,793 |
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 5.75%, 2012 (c) | | | 2,155,000 | | | 2,359,079 |
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 7%, 2013 (c) | | | 45,000 | | | 54,514 |
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1-A”, 5%, 2041 | | | 7,465,000 | | | 4,015,125 |
Rhode Island Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “A”, 0%, 2052 | | | 21,565,000 | | | 258,349 |
Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority, CA, Tobacco Settlement Rev. (Santa Clara), “A”, 0%, 2036 | | | 7,265,000 | | | 526,640 |
Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority, CA, Tobacco Settlement Rev. (Santa Clara), “A”, 0%, 2041 | | | 5,640,000 | | | 240,772 |
South Carolina Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., “B”, 6.375%, 2011 (c) | | | 3,725,000 | | | 4,048,107 |
Virginia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “B-1”, 5%, 2047 | | | 5,035,000 | | | 2,729,222 |
Washington Tobacco Settlement Authority, 6.5%, 2026 | | | 915,000 | | | 900,159 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 84,457,136 |
Toll Roads - 2.8% | | | | | | |
Bay Area Toll Authority, CA, Toll Bridge Rev. (San Francisco Bay Area), “F1”, 5%, 2034 | | $ | 10,725,000 | | $ | 10,486,369 |
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado Rev., Capital Appreciation, “B”, NATL, 0%, 2027 | | | 12,305,000 | | | 3,362,587 |
Illinois Toll Highway Authority Rev., “B”, 5.5%, 2033 | | | 6,095,000 | | | 6,361,230 |
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Rev., Capital Appreciation, “C”, FSA, 0% to 2016, 6.25% to 2033 | | | 11,590,000 | | | 7,712,681 |
San Joaquin Hills, CA, Transportation Corridor Agency, Toll Road Rev., ETM, 0%, 2011 (c)(f) | | | 13,400,000 | | | 13,178,364 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 41,101,231 |
32
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Transportation - Special Tax - 1.2% | | | | | | |
Arizona Transportation Board Highway Rev., “B”, 5%, 2033 | | $ | 9,780,000 | | $ | 9,934,133 |
Telluride, CO, Real Estate Transfer Assessment Rev. (Gondola Transit Co.), ETM, 11.5%, 2012 (c) | | | 6,000,000 | | | 7,344,720 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 17,278,853 |
Universities - Colleges - 9.5% | | | | | | |
Allegheny County, PA, Higher Education Building Authority Rev. (Robert Morris University) “A”, 5.9%, 2028 | | $ | 1,305,000 | | $ | 1,096,500 |
Allegheny County, PA, Higher Education Building Authority Rev. (Robert Morris University), “A”, 6%, 2038 | | | 2,025,000 | | | 1,626,905 |
Anderson, IN, Economic Development Rev. (Anderson University Project), 5%, 2028 | | | 3,530,000 | | | 2,533,022 |
Anderson, IN, Economic Development Rev. (Anderson University Project), 5%, 2032 | | | 1,025,000 | | | 706,276 |
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (California Lutheran University), 5.75%, 2038 | | | 2,320,000 | | | 2,052,411 |
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University Financing Project), 5%, 2026 | | | 1,660,000 | | | 1,197,175 |
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of La Verne), “A”, 5%, 2029 | | | 2,205,000 | | | 1,765,984 |
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Southern California), “A”, 5.25%, 2038 | | | 1,935,000 | | | 1,982,911 |
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev., “A”, 4.5%, 2033 | | | 4,075,000 | | | 3,741,339 |
California Municipal Finance Authority Rev. (Biola University), 5.8%, 2028 | | | 1,915,000 | | | 1,801,057 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (California Baptist University), “A”, 5.4%, 2027 | | | 1,385,000 | | | 972,547 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (California Baptist University), “A”, 5.5%, 2038 | | | 1,580,000 | | | 1,043,242 |
Delaware County, PA, Authority College Rev. (Neumann College), 6%, 2025 | | | 510,000 | | | 507,863 |
Delaware County, PA, Authority College Rev. (Neumann College), 6.125%, 2034 | | | 250,000 | | | 243,567 |
Forest Grove, OR, Campus Improvement Rev. (Pacific University Project), 6.375%, 2039 | | | 2,500,000 | | | 2,455,550 |
Grand Valley, MI, State University Rev., 5.5%, 2027 | | | 1,015,000 | | | 1,030,184 |
Grand Valley, MI, State University Rev., 5.625%, 2029 | | | 495,000 | | | 502,519 |
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Rev. (Baylor College of Medicine), “D”, 5.625%, 2032 | | | 2,240,000 | | | 2,235,453 |
Harrisburg, PA, University Authority Rev. (Harrisburg University of Science), “A”, 5.4%, 2016 | | | 395,000 | | | 386,369 |
Houston, TX, Community College Systems, COP, NATL, 7.875%, 2012 (c) | | | 9,150,000 | | | 10,958,589 |
33
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Universities - Colleges - continued | | | | | | |
Illinois Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Augustana College), “A”, 5.625%, 2022 | | $ | 1,300,000 | | $ | 1,160,120 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), “A”, 5%, 2031 | | | 3,125,000 | | | 2,343,031 |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), “A”, 5%, 2036 | | | 3,080,000 | | | 2,233,123 |
Indiana Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Manchester College), 5.75%, 2018 | | | 1,000,000 | | | 908,880 |
Marietta, GA, Development Facilities Authority Rev. (Life University), 7%, 2030 | | | 1,330,000 | | | 1,135,301 |
Marietta, GA, Development Facilities Authority Rev. (Life University), 7%, 2039 | | | 1,575,000 | | | 1,304,021 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Curry College), “A”, ACA, 5%, 2036 | | | 1,135,000 | | | 876,197 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Simmons College), “H”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2033 | | | 430,000 | | | 339,102 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Harvard University), 5.5%, 2036 (u) | | | 25,000,000 | | | 26,995,500 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Simmons College), “I”, 8%, 2029 | | | 2,140,000 | | | 2,243,062 |
Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (College for Creative Studies), 6.125%, 2037 | | | 4,315,000 | | | 3,400,824 |
Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Metropolitan Government Health & Educational Facilities Board (Vanderbilt University), “A”, 5%, 2039 (u) | | | 10,000,000 | | | 10,070,600 |
Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Metropolitan Government Health & Educational Facilities Board (Vanderbilt University), “B”, 5%, 2039 (u) | | | 10,000,000 | | | 10,070,600 |
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Dartmouth College), 5.25%, 2039 (u) | | | 20,000,000 | | | 20,760,400 |
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Medicine & Dentistry), “B”, 6%, 2017 | | | 2,335,000 | | | 2,404,069 |
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Medicine & Dentistry), “B”, 7.5%, 2032 | | | 4,280,000 | | | 4,507,182 |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Lasalle University), “A”, 5.25%, 2027 | | | 1,330,000 | | | 1,208,372 |
San Leanna, TX, Educational Facilities Corp., Higher Education Rev. (St. Edwards University), 5%, 2014 | | | 440,000 | | | 446,556 |
San Leanna, TX, Educational Facilities Corp., Higher Education Rev. (St. Edwards University), 5.125%, 2036 | | | 1,055,000 | | | 923,695 |
Savannah, GA, Economic Development Authority Rev. (College of Art & Design, Inc.), ETM, 6.2%, 2009 (c) | | | 260,000 | | | 262,361 |
34
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Universities - Colleges - continued | | | | | | |
Tulsa, OK, Industrial Authority Rev. (University of Tulsa), 6%, 2027 | | $ | 4,795,000 | | $ | 5,074,884 |
University of Southern Indiana Rev., Student Fee, “J”, ASSD GTY, 5.75%, 2028 | | | 1,445,000 | | | 1,557,840 |
Wilkes-Barre, PA, Finance Authority Rev. (Wilkes University), 5%, 2037 | | | 3,000,000 | | | 2,325,270 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 141,390,453 |
Universities - Dormitories - 0.4% | | | | | | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Lancer Educational Student Housing Project), 5.625%, 2033 | | $ | 2,345,000 | | $ | 1,489,896 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Student Housing, SUCI East Campus), 6%, 2040 | | | 2,125,000 | | | 1,955,149 |
Illinois Educational Facilities Authority, Educational Advancement Fund (University Center), 6.625%, 2012 (c) | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,743,750 |
Maryland Economic Development Corp. Student Housing (University of Maryland - College Park), 5.875%, 2043 | | | 1,335,000 | | | 1,262,963 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 6,451,758 |
Universities - Secondary Schools - 1.2% | | | | | | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Escondido Charter High School), 7.5%, 2011 (c) | | $ | 1,630,000 | | $ | 1,819,976 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Escondido Charter High School), 7.5%, 2011 (c) | | | 3,485,000 | | | 4,029,322 |
Colorado Housing Finance Development Rev. (Evergreen Country Day School), 5.875%, 2037 | | | 815,000 | | | 523,002 |
Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lee Charter Foundation), “A”, 5.25%, 2027 | | | 1,570,000 | | | 1,024,912 |
Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lee Charter Foundation), “A”, 5.375%, 2037 | | | 3,155,000 | | | 1,916,410 |
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Washington Christian Academy), 5.25%, 2018 | | | 985,000 | | | 657,350 |
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Washington Christian Academy), 5.5%, 2038 | | | 460,000 | | | 224,084 |
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, Economic Development Authority Rev. (Our Lady of Good Council), “A”, 6%, 2035 | | | 450,000 | | | 345,235 |
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority Rev. (YMCA Service Learning Academy), 7.625%, 2021 | | | 550,000 | | | 504,928 |
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority Rev. (YMCA Service Learning Academy), 7.75%, 2031 | | | 2,450,000 | | | 2,111,949 |
Utah County, UT, Charter School Rev. (Lakeview Academy), “A”, 5.625%, 2037 | | | 1,815,000 | | | 1,284,276 |
35
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Universities - Secondary Schools - continued | | | | | | |
Utah County, UT, Charter School Rev. (Renaissance Academy), “A”, 5.625%, 2037 | | $ | 1,065,000 | | $ | 730,728 |
Utah County, UT, Charter School Rev. (Ronald Wilson Reagan Academy), “A”, 6%, 2038 | | | 2,820,000 | | | 2,081,752 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 17,253,924 |
Utilities - Cogeneration - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority, 5.7%, 2012 | | $ | 525,000 | | $ | 510,536 |
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority, 5.875%, 2032 | | | 1,495,000 | | | 1,139,758 |
Ohio Water Development Authority (Bay Shore Power), 5.875%, 2020 | | | 1,700,000 | | | 1,450,032 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Rev., Resource Recovery Rev. (Colver), “G”, 5.125%, 2015 | | | 950,000 | | | 816,316 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Rev., Resource Recovery Rev. (Northampton Generating), “A”, 6.5%, 2013 | | | 2,300,000 | | | 1,626,261 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 5,542,903 |
Utilities - Investor Owned - 4.3% | | | | | | |
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), 8.25%, 2030 | | $ | 1,000,000 | | $ | 499,710 |
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), “C”, 5.75%, 2036 (b) | | | 7,265,000 | | | 5,630,956 |
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), “D”, 5.4%, 2029 (b) | | | 310,000 | | | 207,657 |
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Energy Co. LLC), 5%, 2041 | | | 3,015,000 | | | 1,358,016 |
Brazos River Authority, TX, Project Rev. (Centerpoint Energy), “C”, AMBAC, 5.125%, 2019 | | | 4,035,000 | | | 3,909,915 |
Chula Vista, CA, Industrial Development Rev. (San Diego Gas), 5.875%, 2034 | | | 1,940,000 | | | 1,899,279 |
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service New Mexico), 4.875%, 2033 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,464,400 |
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service New Mexico), “A”, 6.3%, 2016 | | | 3,240,000 | | | 3,242,074 |
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service New Mexico), “A”, 5.8%, 2022 | | | 4,500,000 | | | 4,204,890 |
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service New Mexico), “C”, 5.8%, 2022 | | | 1,390,000 | | | 1,298,844 |
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Tucson Electric), “A”, 6.95%, 2020 | | | 3,000,000 | | | 3,001,650 |
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance Special Purpose Rev. (Hawaiian Electric Co.), 6.5%, 2039 | | | 5,985,000 | | | 6,053,289 |
36
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Utilities - Investor Owned - continued | | | | | | |
Maricopa County, AZ, Pollution Control Rev. (El Paso Electric), “B”, 7.25%, 2040 | | $ | 1,790,000 | | $ | 1,942,419 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Dominion Energy Brayton), 5.75%, 2042 (b) | | | 685,000 | | | 715,572 |
Matagorda County, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (Central Power & Light Co.), “A”, 6.3%, 2029 | | | 2,155,000 | | | 2,211,138 |
Matagorda County, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (Reliant Energy), 5.95%, 2030 | | | 3,450,000 | | | 2,816,822 |
Mecklenburg County, VA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (UAE Mecklenburg LP), 6.5%, 2017 | | | 2,800,000 | | | 2,837,408 |
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Detroit Edison), 5.625%, 2020 | | | 1,050,000 | | | 1,090,278 |
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Detroit Edison), 5.5%, 2029 (b) | | | 2,100,000 | | | 2,167,536 |
Owen County, KY, Waterworks System Rev. (American Water Co. Project), “A”, 6.25%, 2039 | | | 1,635,000 | | | 1,661,193 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (Allegheny Energy Supply Co. LLC), 7%, 2039 | | | 7,390,000 | | | 7,479,197 |
Pointe Coupee Parish, LA, Pollution Control Rev. (Gulf States Utilities Co.), 6.7%, 2013 | | | 545,000 | | | 546,079 |
Red River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (AEP Texas Central Co.), NATL, 4.45%, 2020 | | | 2,635,000 | | | 2,305,441 |
Sabine River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), 5.2%, 2028 | | | 1,255,000 | | | 602,977 |
Sabine River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), 5.75%, 2030 (b) | | | 2,250,000 | | | 1,743,930 |
West Feliciana Parish, LA, Pollution Control Rev. (Entergy Gulf States), 6.6%, 2028 | | | 1,805,000 | | | 1,804,982 |
Yuma County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority (Far West Water & Sewer, Inc.), 6.375%, 2037 | | | 2,605,000 | | | 2,123,023 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 64,818,675 |
Utilities - Other - 2.2% | | | | | | |
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2018 | | $ | 1,760,000 | | $ | 1,779,043 |
Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5.5%, 2028 | | | 2,245,000 | | | 1,908,901 |
Public Authority for Colorado Energy Natural Gas Purchase Rev., 6.25%, 2028 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 3,869,200 |
Public Authority for Colorado Energy Natural Gas Purchase Rev., 6.5%, 2038 | | | 4,515,000 | | | 4,399,190 |
SA Energy Acquisition Public Facility Corp. (Tex Gas Supply), 5.5%, 2027 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 3,592,560 |
37
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Utilities - Other - continued | | | | | | |
Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Rev., 5%, 2032 | | $ | 6,670,000 | | $ | 5,189,393 |
Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Rev., 5%, 2037 | | | 2,275,000 | | | 1,701,495 |
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2019 | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,913,240 |
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2022 | | | 2,010,000 | | | 1,850,929 |
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2024 | | | 2,225,000 | | | 2,003,056 |
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2026 | | | 3,215,000 | | | 2,844,471 |
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “C”, 5%, 2025 | | | 1,665,000 | | | 1,449,066 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 32,500,544 |
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue - 4.5% | | | | | | |
Alabama Drinking Water Finance Authority, “A”, AMBAC, 4%, 2028 | | $ | 5,000,000 | | $ | 4,308,650 |
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Rev., “A”, 6%, 2022 | | | 2,895,000 | | | 2,952,350 |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., “A”, 6%, 2038 | | | 4,410,000 | | | 4,240,303 |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., “A”, 6%, 2044 | | | 1,215,000 | | | 1,163,691 |
Los Angeles County, CA, Sanitation Districts Financing Authority Rev., AMBAC, 4.5%, 2038 | | | 8,660,000 | | | 6,963,246 |
Los Angeles, CA, Department of Water & Power Waterworks Rev., “A-2”, AMBAC, 4.75%, 2039 | | | 4,920,000 | | | 4,429,525 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement, 5.25%, 2028 | | | 4,000,000 | | | 4,517,640 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, “A”, FSA, 4.375%, 2032 | | | 7,840,000 | | | 7,219,621 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, “B”, FSA, 5.25%, 2029 | | | 5,185,000 | | | 5,708,581 |
New York, NY, Municipal Water & Sewer Finance Authority Rev., AMBAC, 5%, 2039 | | | 5,000,000 | | | 4,931,000 |
New York, NY, Municipal Water & Sewer Finance Authority Rev., “A”, 5%, 2035 | | | 5,520,000 | | | 5,511,720 |
New York, NY, Municipal Water & Sewer Finance Authority Rev., “DD”, 5%, 2039 | | | 5,000,000 | | | 4,931,000 |
New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & Sewer Systems Rev. “DD”, 4.75%, 2035 | | | 2,750,000 | | | 2,608,650 |
Seattle, WA, Water System Rev., Refunding & Improvement, 5.25%, 2033 | | | 5,000,000 | | | 5,151,800 |
Tallahassee, FL, Consolidated Utility Systems Rev., 5%, 2037 | | | 1,995,000 | | | 1,941,973 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 66,579,750 |
Total Municipal Bonds (Identified Cost, $1,721,163,229) | | | | | $ | 1,486,034,113 |
38
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Money Market Funds (v) - 2.4% | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) | |
| | | | | | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.21%, at Cost and Net Asset Value | | 35,765,180 | | $ | 35,765,180 | |
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $1,756,928,409) | | | | $ | 1,521,799,293 | |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (2.0)% | | | | | (30,550,340 | ) |
Net Assets - 100.0% | | | | $ | 1,491,248,953 | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | Mandatory tender date is earlier than stated maturity date. |
(d) | Non-income producing security – in default. |
(f) | All or a portion of the security has been segregated as collateral for open futures contracts. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $12,677,535, representing 0.9% of net assets. |
(p) | Primary inverse floater. |
(q) | Interest received was less than stated coupon rate. |
(u) | Underlying security deposited into special purpose trust (“the trust”) by investment banker upon creation of self-deposited inverse floaters. |
(v) | Underlying fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
| | | | | | |
Restricted Securities | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | Current Market Value |
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 7.5%, 2049 | | 5/18/99 | | $6,000,000 | | $4,792,860 |
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.4%, 2049 | | 10/14/04 | | 2,000,000 | | 1,158,600 |
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.9%, 2049 | | 11/02/05 | | 2,000,000 | | 898,440 |
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | $6,849,900 |
% of Net Assets | | | | | | 0.5% |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
COP | | Certificate of Participation |
FRN | | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
39
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Insurers | | Inverse Floaters |
ACA | | ACA Financial Guaranty Corp. | | RITES | | Residual Interest Tax-Exempt Security |
AMBAC | | AMBAC Indemnity Corp. | | | | |
ASSD GTY | | Assured Guaranty Insurance Co. | | | | |
FGIC | | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. | | | | |
FHA | | Federal Housing Administration | | | | |
FNMA | | Federal National Mortgage Assn. | | | | |
FSA | | Financial Security Assurance, Inc. | | | | |
GNMA | | Government National Mortgage Assn. | | | | |
LOC | | Letter of Credit | | | | |
NATL | | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. | | | | |
PSF | | Permanent School Fund | | | | |
RADIAN | | Radian Asset Assurance, Inc. | | | | |
SYNCORA | | Syncora Guarantee Inc. | | | | |
Derivative Contracts at 7/31/09
Futures Contracts Outstanding at 7/31/09
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Currency | | Contracts | | Value | | Expiration Date | | Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Liability Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Futures | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Bond 30 yr (Short) | | USD | | 114 | | $13,566,000 | | Sep-09 | | $(198,118 | ) |
At July 31, 2009, the fund had sufficient cash and/or other liquid securities to cover any commitments under these derivative contracts.
See Notes to Financial Statements
40
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 7/31/09 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
| | | |
Assets | | | |
Investments- | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $1,721,163,229) | | $1,486,034,113 | |
Underlying funds, at cost and value | | 35,765,180 | |
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $1,756,928,409) | | $1,521,799,293 | |
Receivables for | | | |
Investments sold | | 1,931,250 | |
Fund shares sold | | 6,770,696 | |
Interest and dividends | | 24,237,403 | |
Receivable from investment adviser | | 43,066 | |
Other assets | | 7,619 | |
Total assets | | $1,554,789,327 | |
Liabilities | | | |
Payables for | | | |
Distributions | | $3,399,547 | |
Daily variation margin on open futures contracts | | 222,656 | |
Investments purchased | | 12,755,068 | |
Fund shares reacquired | | 1,689,501 | |
Payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets | | 45,008,024 | |
Payable for interest expense and fees | | 91,854 | |
Payable to affiliates | | | |
Investment Adviser | | 44,759 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | 183,598 | |
Distribution and service fees | | 14,326 | |
Administrative services fee | | 1,472 | |
Payable for independent trustees’ compensation | | 34,968 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | 94,601 | |
Total liabilities | | $63,540,374 | |
Net assets | | $1,491,248,953 | |
Net assets consist of | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $1,816,632,064 | |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | | (235,327,234 | ) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | (94,535,407 | ) |
Undistributed net investment income | | 4,479,530 | |
Net assets | | $1,491,248,953 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | | 219,400,842 | |
| | | | | | |
| | Net assets | | Shares outstanding | | Net asset value per share (a) |
Class A | | $1,239,401,330 | | 182,383,658 | | $6.80 |
Class B | | 71,485,539 | | 10,507,721 | | 6.80 |
Class C | | 180,362,084 | | 26,509,463 | | 6.80 |
(a) | Maximum offering price and redemption price per share were equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Class A, for which the maximum offering price per share was $7.14. |
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares.
See Notes to Financial Statements
41
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | | |
Income | | | | | | |
Interest | | $48,763,997 | | | | |
Dividends from underlying funds | | 32,555 | | | | |
Total investment income | | | | | $48,796,552 | |
Expenses | | | | | | |
Management fee | | $3,713,128 | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | 1,117,866 | | | | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | 576,062 | | | | |
Administrative services fee | | 134,107 | | | | |
Independent trustees’ compensation | | 24,066 | | | | |
Custodian fee | | 98,566 | | | | |
Shareholder communications | | 35,939 | | | | |
Auditing fees | | 25,628 | | | | |
Legal fees | | 37,584 | | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | 113,847 | | | | |
Miscellaneous | | 140,811 | | | | |
Total expenses | | | | | $6,017,604 | |
Fees paid indirectly | | (32,569 | ) | | | |
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser | | (260,481 | ) | | | |
Net expenses | | | | | $5,724,554 | |
Net investment income | | | | | $43,071,998 | |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | | | | |
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $(17,759,708 | ) | | | |
Futures contracts | | (331,407 | ) | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | | | $(18,091,115 | ) |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | | | |
Investments | | $113,702,180 | | | | |
Futures contracts | | 529,887 | | | | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | | | $114,232,067 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | | | $96,140,952 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | | | $139,212,950 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
42
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
| | | | | | |
Change in net assets | | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Year ended 1/31/09 | |
From operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $43,071,998 | | | $85,114,282 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | (18,091,115 | ) | | (29,597,830 | ) |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | 114,232,067 | | | (321,770,132 | ) |
Change in net assets from operations | | $139,212,950 | | | $(266,253,680 | ) |
Distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(42,878,669 | ) | | $(86,045,396 | ) |
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | | $124,483,892 | | | $55,333,284 | |
Total change in net assets | | $220,818,173 | | | $(296,965,792 | ) |
Net assets | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | | 1,270,430,780 | | | 1,567,396,572 | |
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $4,479,530 and $4,286,201, respectively) | | $1,491,248,953 | | | $1,270,430,780 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
43
Financial Statements
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09
| | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class A | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $6.33 | | | $8.06 | | | $8.49 | | | $8.41 | | | $8.39 | | | $8.28 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.21 | | | $0.44 | | | $0.47 | | | $0.45 | | | $0.46 | | | $0.48 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | 0.47 | | | (1.73 | ) | | (0.47 | ) | | 0.07 | | | 0.02 | | | 0.09 | |
Total from investment operations | | $0.68 | | | $(1.29 | ) | | $(0.00 | )(w) | | $0.52 | | | $0.48 | | | $0.57 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.21 | ) | | $(0.44 | ) | | $(0.43 | ) | | $(0.44 | ) | | $(0.46 | ) | | $(0.46 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $6.80 | | | $6.33 | | | $8.06 | | | $8.49 | | | $8.41 | | | $8.39 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 10.93 | (n) | | (16.50 | ) | | 0.04 | | | 6.32 | | | 5.81 | | | 7.16 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 0.73 | (a) | | 0.80 | | | 0.86 | | | 0.97 | | | 0.94 | (z) | | 0.80 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 0.69 | (a) | | 0.70 | | | 0.76 | | | 0.87 | | | 0.84 | (z) | | 0.71 | |
Expenses after expense reductions and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l) | | 0.67 | (a) | | 0.64 | | | 0.63 | | | 0.72 | | | 0.72 | | | 0.71 | |
Net investment income | | 6.54 | (a) | | 5.97 | | | 5.60 | | | 5.32 | | | 5.47 | | | 5.82 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 15 | | | 38 | | | 38 | | | 13 | | | 20 | | | 13 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $1,239,401 | | | $1,039,232 | | | $1,267,514 | | | $1,335,269 | | | $1,080,805 | | | $977,416 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
44
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class B | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $6.33 | | | $8.06 | | | $8.50 | | | $8.41 | | | $8.40 | | | $8.28 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.19 | | | $0.38 | | | $0.40 | | | $0.39 | | | $0.40 | | | $0.42 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | 0.47 | | | (1.73 | ) | | (0.47 | ) | | 0.07 | | | 0.00 | (w) | | 0.10 | |
Total from investment operations | | $0.66 | | | $(1.35 | ) | | $(0.07 | ) | | $0.46 | | | $0.40 | | | $0.52 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.19 | ) | | $(0.38 | ) | | $(0.37 | ) | | $(0.37 | ) | | $(0.39 | ) | | $(0.40 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $6.80 | | | $6.33 | | | $8.06 | | | $8.50 | | | $8.41 | | | $8.40 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 10.51 | (n) | | (17.16 | ) | | (0.85 | ) | | 5.64 | | | 4.88 | | | 6.47 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.50 | (a) | | 1.56 | | | 1.63 | | | 1.74 | | | 1.70 | (z) | | 1.57 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.46 | (a) | | 1.47 | | | 1.53 | | | 1.64 | | | 1.60 | (z) | | 1.48 | |
Expenses after expense reductions and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l) | | 1.44 | (a) | | 1.41 | | | 1.40 | | | 1.50 | | | 1.48 | | | 1.48 | |
Net investment income | | 5.79 | (a) | | 5.18 | | | 4.83 | | | 4.60 | | | 4.73 | | | 5.05 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 15 | | | 38 | | | 38 | | | 13 | | | 20 | | | 13 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $71,486 | | | $75,791 | | | $127,599 | | | $178,566 | | | $220,854 | | | $283,360 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
45
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09
(unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class C | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $6.33 | | | $8.06 | | | $8.50 | | | $8.42 | | | $8.40 | | | $8.29 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.18 | | | $0.36 | | | $0.38 | | | $0.36 | | | $0.37 | | | $0.39 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | 0.47 | | | (1.72 | ) | | (0.47 | ) | | 0.08 | | | 0.02 | | | 0.10 | |
Total from investment operations | | $0.65 | | | $(1.36 | ) | | $(0.09 | ) | | $0.44 | | | $0.39 | | | $0.49 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.18 | ) | | $(0.37 | ) | | $(0.35 | ) | | $(0.36 | ) | | $(0.37 | ) | | $(0.38 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $6.80 | | | $6.33 | | | $8.06 | | | $8.50 | | | $8.42 | | | $8.40 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 10.39 | (n) | | (17.36 | ) | | (1.08 | ) | | 5.27 | | | 4.76 | | | 6.10 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.72 | (a) | | 1.80 | | | 1.86 | | | 1.97 | | | 1.94 | (z) | | 1.80 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.69 | (a) | | 1.70 | | | 1.76 | | | 1.87 | | | 1.84 | (z) | | 1.71 | |
Expenses after expense reductions and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l) | | 1.67 | (a) | | 1.64 | | | 1.63 | | | 1.72 | | | 1.72 | | | 1.71 | |
Net investment income | | 5.54 | (a) | | 4.96 | | | 4.60 | | | 4.30 | | | 4.44 | | | 4.80 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 15 | | | 38 | | | 38 | | | 13 | | | 20 | | | 13 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $180,362 | | | $155,407 | | | $172,283 | | | $170,047 | | | $119,952 | | | $85,715 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
46
Financial Highlights – continued
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(l) | Interest expense and fees relate to payments made to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(w) | Per share amount was less than $0.01. |
(z) | After the fund issued its January 31, 2006 financial statements, the fund determined that the criteria for sale accounting in FASB Statement No. 140 had not been met for certain transfers of municipal bonds during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 and that its transfers of municipal bonds in connection with self-deposited inverse floaters should have been accounted for as secured borrowings rather than as sales. Accordingly, the expense ratio has been restated to reflect interest expense and fees related to payments made to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets in connection with self-deposited inverse floater transactions. The impact of the restatement was to increase the expense ratio by 0.12%. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
47
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) | | Business and Organization |
MFS Municipal High Income Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust III which is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) | | Significant Accounting Policies |
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In making these estimates and assumptions, management has considered the effects, if any, of events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through September 16, 2009 which is the date that the financial statements were issued. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The value of municipal instruments can be affected by changes in their actual or perceived credit quality. The credit quality of municipal instruments can be affected by, among other things, the financial condition of the issuer or guarantor, the issuer’s future borrowing plans and sources of revenue, the economic feasibility of the revenue bond project or general borrowing purpose, political or economic developments in the region where the instrument is issued and the liquidity of the security. Municipal instruments generally trade in the over-the-counter market. Municipal instruments backed by current and anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets can be negatively affected by the discontinuance of the taxation supporting the projects or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. If the Internal Revenue Service determines an issuer of a municipal instrument has not complied with the applicable tax requirements, the security could decline in value, interest from the security could become taxable and the funds may be required to issue Forms 1099-DIV. The fund can invest up to 100% of its portfolio in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.
48
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures contracts are primarily traded. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
49
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities carried at market value. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures, forwards, swap contracts, and written options. The following is a summary of the levels used as of July 31, 2009 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities carried at market value:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Investments at Value | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
Municipal Bonds | | $— | | | $1,486,034,113 | | $— | | $1,486,034,113 | |
Mutual Funds | | 35,765,180 | | | — | | — | | 35,765,180 | |
Total Investments | | $35,765,180 | | | $1,486,034,113 | | $— | | $1,521,799,293 | |
| | | | |
Other Financial Instruments | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
Futures | | $(198,118 | ) | | $— | | $— | | $(198,118 | ) |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Derivatives – The fund may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the fund, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives may be used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
In this reporting period the fund adopted FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“FAS 161”), and FASB Staff Position FAS No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FAS 161 (“FSP FAS 133-1”).
FAS 161 amends FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities (“FAS 133”). FAS 161 provides enhanced disclosures about the fund’s use of and accounting for derivative instruments and the effect of
50
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
derivative instruments on the fund’s results of operations and financial position. Under FAS 161, tabular disclosure regarding derivative fair value and gain/loss by contract type (e.g., interest rate contracts, foreign exchange contracts, credit contracts, etc.) is required and derivatives accounted for as hedging instruments under FAS 133 must be disclosed separately from derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133. Because investment companies account for their derivatives at fair value and record any changes in fair value in current period earnings, the fund’s derivatives are not accounted for as hedging instruments under FAS 133. As such, even though the fund may use derivatives in an attempt to achieve an economic hedge, the fund’s derivatives are not considered to be hedging instruments under FAS 133.
FSP FAS 133-1 amends FAS 133 to require sellers of credit derivatives to make disclosures that will enable financial statement users to assess the potential effects of those credit derivatives on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. As defined by FSP FAS 133-1, a credit derivative is a derivative instrument (a) in which one or more of the derivative’s underlyings are related to the credit risk of a specified entity (or group of entities) or an index based on the credit risk of a group of entities and (b) that exposes the seller to potential loss from credit-risk-related events specified in the derivative contract. The seller (or writer) is the party that provides the credit protection and assumes the credit risk on a credit derivatives contract, such as a credit default swap. There was no impact from implementing FSP 133-1 as the fund did not hold any of these credit derivatives at period end.
As defined under FAS 133, derivative instruments include written options, purchased options, futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at July 31, 2009:
| | | | | | | |
| | | | Liability Derivatives | |
| | | | Location on Statement of Assets and Liabilities | | Fair Value | |
Interest Rate Contracts not Accounted for as Hedging Instruments Under FAS 133 | | Interest Rate Futures | | Unrealized depreciation on investments | | $(198,118 | )(a) |
(a) | Includes cumulative appreciation/depreciation of futures contracts as reported in the fund’s Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day’s variation margin for futures contracts is reported within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
51
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2009 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | |
| | Futures Contracts | |
Interest Rate Contracts | | $(331,407 | ) |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2009 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | |
| | Futures Contracts |
Interest Rate Contracts | | $529,887 |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported balance sheet assets and liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forwards, swaps and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts will be
52
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Futures Contracts – The fund may use futures contracts to gain or to hedge against broad market, interest rate or currency exposure. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures is realized.
The fund bears the risk of interest rates, exchange rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The fund’s maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.
Inverse Floaters – The fund invests in municipal inverse floating rate securities which are structured by the issuer (known as primary market inverse floating rate securities) or by an investment banker utilizing municipal bonds which have already been issued (known as secondary market inverse floating rate securities) to have variable rates of interest which typically move in the opposite direction of short term interest rates. A secondary market inverse floating rate security is created when an investment banker transfers a fixed rate municipal bond to a special purpose trust, and causes the trust to (a) issue floating rate certificates to third parties, in an amount equal to a fraction of the par amount of the deposited bonds (these certificates usually pay tax-exempt interest at short-term interest rates that typically reset weekly; and the certificate holders typically, on seven days notice, have the option to tender their certificates to the investment banker or another party for redemption at par plus accrued interest), and (b) issue inverse floating rate certificates (sometimes referred to as “inverse floaters”). If the holder of the inverse floater transfers the municipal bonds to an investment banker for the purpose of depositing the municipal bonds into the special purpose trust, the inverse
53
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
floating rate certificates that are issued by the trust are referred to as “self-deposited inverse floaters.” If the bonds held by the trust are purchased by the investment banker for deposit into the trust from someone other than the purchasers of the inverse floaters, the inverse floating rate certificates that are issued by the trust are referred to as “externally deposited inverse floaters.” Such self-deposited inverse floaters held by the fund are accounted for as secured borrowings, with the municipal bonds reflected in the investments of the fund and amounts owed to the holder of the floating rate certificate under the provisions of the trust, which amounts are paid solely from the assets of the trust, reflected as liabilities of the fund in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities under the caption, “Payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets”. At July 31, 2009, the fund’s payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets was $45,008,024 and the interest rate on these floating rate certificates issued by the trust was 1.868%. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, the average daily payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets was $17,595,939 at a weighted average interest rate of 1.30%. Interest expense and fees relate to interest payments made to the holder of certain floating rate certificates and associated fees, both of which are made from trust assets. Interest expense and fees are recorded as incurred. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, interest expense and fees in connection with self-deposited inverse floaters was $113,847. Primary and externally deposited inverse floaters held by the fund are not accounted for as secured borrowings.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by
54
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Legal fees and other related expenses incurred to preserve and protect the value of a security owned are added to the cost of the security; other legal fees are expensed. Capital infusions made directly to the security issuer, which are generally non-recurring, incurred to protect or enhance the value of high-yield debt securities, are reported as additions to the cost basis of the security. Costs that are incurred to negotiate the terms or conditions of capital infusions or that are expected to result in a plan of reorganization are reported as realized losses. Ongoing costs incurred to protect or enhance an investment, or costs incurred to pursue other claims or legal actions, are expensed.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended July 31, 2009, is shown as a reduction of total expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to expiration of capital loss carryforwards, amortization and accretion of debt securities, and secured borrowings.
55
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
| | |
| | 1/31/09 |
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | | $1,311,178 |
Tax-exempt income | | 84,734,218 |
Total distributions | | $86,045,396 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
| | | |
As of 7/31/09 | | | |
Cost of investments | | $1,706,013,002 | |
Gross appreciation | | 38,757,662 | |
Gross depreciation | | (267,979,395 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $(229,221,733 | ) |
| |
As of 1/31/09 | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | 1,213,500 | |
Undistributed tax-exempt income | | 10,182,638 | |
Capital loss carryforwards | | (70,027,820 | ) |
Post-October capital loss deferral | | (12,437,504 | ) |
Other temporary differences | | (7,109,937 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | (343,538,269 | ) |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments.
As of January 31, 2009, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
| | | |
1/31/10 | | $(2,971,573 | ) |
1/31/11 | | (18,364,839 | ) |
1/31/12 | | (15,537,212 | ) |
1/31/13 | | (3,190,630 | ) |
1/31/14 | | (10,798,317 | ) |
1/31/15 | | (230,213 | ) |
1/31/17 | | (18,935,036 | ) |
| | $(70,027,820 | ) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution and service fees. The fund’s income, realized and unrealized gain (loss), and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.
56
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Class B shares will convert to Class A shares approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
| | | | |
| | From net investment income |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | Year ended 1/31/09 |
Class A | | $36,161,872 | | $71,815,251 |
Class B | | 2,120,139 | | 5,415,911 |
Class C | | 4,596,658 | | 8,814,234 |
Total | | $42,878,669 | | $86,045,396 |
(3) | | Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.55% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
As part of a settlement agreement with the New York Attorney General concerning market timing and related matters, MFS had agreed to reduce the management fee to 0.50% of the fund’s average daily net assets for the period March 1, 2004 through February 28, 2009. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, this waiver amounted to $49,530 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
The management fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2009 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.54% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Effective March 1, 2009, the investment adviser has agreed in writing to pay a portion of the fund’s operating expenses, exclusive of management fee, distribution and service fees, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs and investment-related expenses (including interest expenses and fees associated with investments in inverse floating rate instruments), such that operating expenses do not exceed 0.12% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until May 31, 2011. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, this reduction amounted to $205,230 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $117,321 for the six months ended July 31, 2009, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the fund.
57
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Distribution Fee Rate (d) | | Service Fee Rate (d) | | Total Distribution Plan (d) | | Annual Effective Rate (e) | | Distribution and Service Fee |
Class B | | 0.75% | | 0.25% | | 1.00% | | 0.77% | | $284,846 |
Class C | | 0.75% | | 0.25% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 833,020 |
Total Distribution and Service Fees | | | | | | | | $1,117,866 |
(d) | As of July 31, 2009, in accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended July 31, 2009 based on each class’ average daily net assets. For one year from the date of sale of Class B shares, assets attributable to such Class B shares are subject to the 0.25% annual Class B service fee. On assets attributable to all other Class B shares, the service fee is not currently in effect, but may be implemented on such date as the fund’s Board of Trustees may determine. |
Certain Class A shares purchased prior to September 1, 2008 are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Certain Class A shares purchased on or subsequent to September 1, 2008 are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 24 months of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended July 31, 2009, were as follows:
| | |
| | Amount |
Class A | | $6,632 |
Class B | | 42,121 |
Class C | | 15,177 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, the fee was $274,158, which equated to 0.0406% annually of the fund’s average daily net
58
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $301,904.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2009 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0199% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
For certain independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001, the fund has an unfunded, defined benefit plan which resulted in a pension expense of $2,617. This amount is included in independent trustees’ compensation for the six months ended July 31, 2009. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain retired independent trustees amounted to $34,944 at July 31, 2009, and is included in payable for independent trustees’ compensation.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $7,220 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $5,721, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the
59
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund may invest in a money market fund managed by MFS which seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in dividends from underlying funds on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
Purchases and sales of investments, other than U.S. Government securities, purchased option transactions, and short-term obligations, aggregated $275,213,367 and $203,856,813, respectively.
(5) | | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | | Year ended 1/31/09 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares sold | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 29,066,427 | | | $193,097,777 | | | 48,701,663 | | | $353,437,071 | |
Class B | | 773,959 | | | 5,102,147 | | | 1,742,984 | | | 12,923,292 | |
Class C | | 3,701,001 | | | 24,448,553 | | | 9,306,964 | | | 69,148,665 | |
| | 33,541,387 | | | $222,648,477 | | | 59,751,611 | | | $435,509,028 | |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 3,014,365 | | | $19,941,060 | | | 5,363,584 | | | $38,362,862 | |
Class B | | 143,062 | | | 946,373 | | | 318,940 | | | 2,297,602 | |
Class C | | 355,716 | | | 2,355,845 | | | 637,430 | | | 4,560,708 | |
| | 3,513,143 | | | $23,243,278 | | | 6,319,954 | | | $45,221,172 | |
Shares reacquired | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | (13,992,978 | ) | | $(91,926,572 | ) | | (47,114,222 | ) | | $(334,748,987 | ) |
Class B | | (2,378,462 | ) | | (15,711,676 | ) | | (5,916,931 | ) | | (42,885,130 | ) |
Class C | | (2,085,697 | ) | | (13,769,615 | ) | | (6,768,875 | ) | | (47,762,799 | ) |
| | (18,457,137 | ) | | $(121,407,863 | ) | | (59,800,028 | ) | | $(425,396,916 | ) |
Net change | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 18,087,814 | | | $121,112,265 | | | 6,951,025 | | | $57,050,946 | |
Class B | | (1,461,441 | ) | | (9,663,156 | ) | | (3,855,007 | ) | | (27,664,236 | ) |
Class C | | 1,971,020 | | | 13,034,783 | | | 3,175,519 | | | 25,946,574 | |
| | 18,597,393 | | | $124,483,892 | | | 6,271,537 | | | $55,333,284 | |
60
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $8,440 and $0, respectively, and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations.
(7) | | Transactions in Underlying Funds-Affiliated Issuers |
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
| | | | | | | | | |
Underlying Funds | | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | | | Ending Shares/Par Amount |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | 13,555,130 | | 151,215,795 | | (129,005,745 | ) | | 35,765,180 |
| | | | |
Underlying Funds | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | Capital Gain Distributions | | Dividend Income | | | Ending Value |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | $— | | $— | | $32,555 | | | $35,765,180 |
61
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2009 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2008 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers,
62
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile for the one-year period and the 1st quintile for the five-year period ended December 31, 2008 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
63
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS currently observes an expense limitation for the Fund. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate was approximately at the Lipper expense group median, and the Fund’s total expense ratio was lower than the Lipper expense group median.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is not currently subject to any breakpoints. Taking into account the expense limitation noted above, the Trustees determined not to recommend any advisory fee breakpoints for the Fund at this time.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the
64
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the entry into the industry of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Funds were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2009.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS will be available on or about November 1, 2009 by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
65
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and copies of this information may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
A shareholder can also obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com.
FURTHER INFORMATION
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
66
CONTACT US
Web site
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
Account service and literature
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Investment professionals
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
Mailing address
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
Overnight mail
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Save paper with eDelivery. MFS® will send you prospectuses, reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter. To sign up: 1. go to mfs.com. 2. log in via MFS® Access. 3. select eDelivery. If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS Access, and eDelivery may not be available to you.
MFS® High Yield Opportunities Fund
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ
NO BANK GUARANTEE
7/31/09
HYO-SEM
LETTER FROM THE CEO
Dear Shareholders:
In the fall of 2008, the markets took investors on what was perhaps the most tumultuous ride of their lives. Many are now debating when the market will stage a sustainable recovery, but not even the most experienced investor can provide a definitive answer to that question.
Even so, the basic rules of investing have not changed, and the turbulence reinforced the benefits of investing through the waves. Investors who jumped ship early on may have regretted their decisions when the markets gained some traction in the early half of this year. While anyone with a short-term horizon may have needed to take some action, most with longer-term goals probably found the best option was to stick with their long-term strategy.
At MFS® we believe investors are always best served by developing a plan with their investment professionals that addresses specific long-term needs. Most advisors agree that yearly reviews are important to monitor a plan’s progress. Most would also caution their clients against reacting too quickly to the daily news. When markets do recover, they often gain ground in quick, sudden bursts. If you are out of the market, you can easily miss the benefits of these rallies.
Few of us would again like to live through the kind of market turmoil we saw over the past year. But as turbulent as markets were, in our view, they proved that the fundamental principles of long-term investing still apply.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer
MFS Investment Management®
September 15, 2009
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio structure (i)
| | |
Top five industries (i) | | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services | | 6.6% |
Gaming & Lodging | | 6.3% |
Utilities — Electric Power | | 5.9% |
Energy — Independent | | 5.8% |
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign | | 5.2% |
| | |
Credit quality of bonds (r) | | |
AAA | | 3.3% |
AA | | 1.4% |
A | | 2.0% |
BBB | | 5.6% |
BB | | 20.7% |
B | | 35.5% |
CCC | | 24.6% |
CC | | 2.5% |
C | | 0.1% |
D | | 1.5% |
Not Rated | | 2.8% |
| |
Portfolio facts | | |
Average Duration (d)(i) | | 4.0 |
Average Effective Maturity (i)(m) | | 6.1 yrs. |
Average Credit Quality of Rated Securities (long-term) (a) | | B+ |
Average Credit Quality of Rated Securities (short-term) (a)(c) | | A-1 |
(a) | The average credit quality of rated securities is based upon a market weighted average of portfolio holdings that are rated by public rating agencies. |
(c) | Includes holding in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is not rated by a public rating agency. The average credit quality of rated securities (short-term) is based upon a market weighted average of the underlying holdings within the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio that are rated by public rating agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the bond component includes accrued interest amounts and may be positively or negatively impacted by the equivalent exposure from any derivative holdings, if applicable. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
(r) | Each security is assigned a rating from Moody’s Investors Service. If not rated by Moody’s, the rating will be that assigned by Standard & Poor’s. Likewise, if not assigned a rating by Standard & Poor’s, it will be based on the rating assigned by Fitch, Inc. For those portfolios that hold a security which is not rated by any of the three agencies, the security is considered Not Rated. Holdings in U.S. Treasuries and government agency mortgage-backed securities, if any, are included in the “AAA”-rating category. Percentages are based on the total market value of investments as of 7/31/09. |
Percentages | are based on net assets as of 7/31/09, unless otherwise noted. |
The | portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different. |
2
EXPENSE TABLE
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period, February 1, 2009 through July 31, 2009
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period February 1, 2009 through July 31, 2009.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
3
Expense Table – continued
| | | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | | Beginning Account Value 2/01/09 | | Ending Account Value 7/31/09 | | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 2/01/09-7/31/09 |
A | | Actual | | 0.91% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,284.56 | | $5.15 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 0.91% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,020.28 | | $4.56 |
B | | Actual | | 1.65% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,282.00 | | $9.34 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.65% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,016.61 | | $8.25 |
C | | Actual | | 1.65% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,280.61 | | $9.33 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.65% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,016.61 | | $8.25 |
I | | Actual | | 0.65% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,285.71 | | $3.68 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 0.65% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,021.57 | | $3.26 |
W | | Actual | | 0.75% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,285.59 | | $4.25 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 0.75% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,021.08 | | $3.76 |
R1 | | Actual | | 1.65% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,281.96 | | $9.34 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.65% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,016.61 | | $8.25 |
R2 | | Actual | | 1.15% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,285.03 | | $6.52 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 1.15% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,019.09 | | $5.76 |
R3 | | Actual | | 0.90% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,284.65 | | $5.10 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 0.90% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,020.33 | | $4.51 |
R4 | | Actual | | 0.65% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,286.20 | | $3.68 |
| Hypothetical (h) | | 0.65% | | $1,000.00 | | $1,021.57 | | $3.26 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid is equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
Expense Changes Impacting the Table
Changes to the fund’s fee arrangements occurred during the six month period. Had these fee changes been in effect throughout the entire six month period, the annualized expense ratios would have been 0.95%, 1.70%, 1.70%, 0.70%, 0.80%, 1.70%, 1.20%, 0.95%, and 0.70% for Classes A, B, C, I, W, R1, R2, R3, and R4 shares, respectively; the actual expenses paid during the period would have been approximately $5.38, $9.62, $9.61, $3.97, $4.53, $9.62, $6.80, $5.38 and $3.97 for Classes A, B, C, I, W, R1, R2, R3, and R4 shares, respectively; and the hypothetical expenses paid during the period would have been approximately $4.76, $8.50, $8.50, $3.51, $4.01, $8.50, $6.01, $4.76, and $3.51 for Classes A, B, C, I, W, R1, R2, R3, and R4 shares, respectively. For further information about the fund’s fee arrangements and changes to those fee arrangements, please see Note 3 in the Notes to Financial Statements.
4
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
7/31/09 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
| | | | | | |
Bonds - 88.7% | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
Aerospace - 1.8% | | | | | | |
Bombardier, Inc., 6.3%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 1,610,000 | | $ | 1,489,249 |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Co. LLC, 8.5%, 2015 | | | 1,927,000 | | | 1,122,477 |
TransDigm Group, Inc., 7.75%, 2014 | | | 700,000 | | | 687,749 |
Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc., 8%, 2011 | | | 5,540,000 | | | 5,235,299 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 8,534,774 |
Airlines - 1.1% | | | | | | |
American Airlines, Inc., 10.375%, 2019 | | $ | 790,000 | | $ | 795,924 |
AMR Corp., 7.858%, 2011 | | | 1,620,000 | | | 1,506,599 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., 7.339%, 2014 | | | 3,604,000 | | | 2,594,879 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., 6.9%, 2017 | | | 154,673 | | | 116,004 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., 6.748%, 2017 | | | 218,461 | | | 168,214 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 5,181,620 |
Apparel Manufacturers - 0.0% | | | | | | |
Propex Fabrics, Inc., 10%, 2012 (d) | | $ | 3,605,000 | | $ | 361 |
| | |
Asset Backed & Securitized - 4.1% | | | | | | |
Anthracite Ltd., CDO, 6%, 2037 (z) | | $ | 1,500,000 | | $ | 120,000 |
Arbor Realty Mortgage Securities, CDO, FRN, 2.804%, 2038 (z) | | | 1,245,520 | | | 49,820 |
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “H”, 6.077%, 2045 (z) | | | 1,025,662 | | | 61,539 |
Babson Ltd., CLO, “D”, FRN, 2.009%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,005,000 | | | 148,237 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., 5.772%, 2017 | | | 3,729,874 | | | 2,062,034 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., 5.39%, 2045 | | | 897,762 | | | 573,333 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 5.811%, 2017 | | | 868,209 | | | 526,904 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 5.658%, 2017 | | | 1,600,000 | | | 1,212,755 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 6.397%, 2018 (z) | | | 3,830,049 | | | 283,092 |
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.699%, 2017 | | | 2,500,000 | | | 451,299 |
Credit Suisse Mortgage Capital Certificate, 5.343%, 2039 | | | 834,050 | | | 495,679 |
Crest Ltd., CDO, 7%, 2040 | | | 993,500 | | | 74,513 |
CWCapital LLC, 5.223%, 2048 | | | 440,000 | | | 346,575 |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.693%, 2025 (i)(z) | | | 1,431,276 | | | 102,193 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.44%, 2045 | | | 2,617,073 | | | 1,578,959 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.466%, 2047 | | | 1,756,714 | | | 990,183 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.42%, 2049 | | | 2,540,000 | | | 2,172,411 |
5
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Asset Backed & Securitized - continued | | | | | | |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.748%, 2049 | | $ | 1,607,194 | | $ | 390,522 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.748%, 2049 | | | 2,453,353 | | | 551,784 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.748%, 2049 | | | 6,734,569 | | | 1,266,004 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 6.062%, 2051 | | | 1,390,000 | | | 295,422 |
Lehman Brothers Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 0.827%, 2030 (i) | | | 1,778,467 | | | 43,816 |
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.829%, 2050 | | | 1,390,000 | | | 346,197 |
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, 5.204%, 2049 | | | 2,831,056 | | | 1,667,015 |
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.749%, 2050 | | | 1,535,000 | | | 1,117,790 |
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.749%, 2050 | | | 725,000 | | | 382,825 |
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., 1.276%, 2039 (i)(z) | | | 4,436,141 | | | 86,948 |
Preferred Term Securities XII Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2033 (a)(e)(z) | | | 1,775,000 | | | 178 |
Preferred Term Securities XVI Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2035 (a)(e)(z) | | | 3,250,000 | | | 325 |
Preferred Term Securities XVII Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2035 (a)(e)(z) | | | 1,813,000 | | | 181 |
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.693%, 2047 | | | 1,607,503 | | | 262,490 |
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.753%, 2047 | | | 1,014,976 | | | 146,959 |
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.902%, 2051 | | | 2,821,707 | | | 1,609,941 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 19,417,923 |
Automotive - 3.3% | | | | | | |
Accuride Corp., 8.5%, 2015 | | $ | 1,600,000 | | $ | 284,000 |
Allison Transmission, Inc., 11%, 2015 (n) | | | 3,155,000 | | | 2,871,050 |
FCE Bank PLC, 7.125%, 2012 | | EUR | 3,500,000 | | | 4,464,752 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 9.75%, 2010 | | $ | 950,000 | | | 945,562 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 7.5%, 2012 | | | 602,000 | | | 555,621 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 12%, 2015 | | | 3,166,000 | | | 3,227,623 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 8%, 2016 | | | 925,000 | | | 829,098 |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 9%, 2015 | | | 1,690,000 | | | 1,715,350 |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 10.5%, 2016 | | | 335,000 | | | 359,288 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 15,252,344 |
Broadcasting - 3.9% | | | | | | |
Allbritton Communications Co., 7.75%, 2012 | | $ | 3,887,000 | | $ | 3,226,210 |
Bonten Media Acquisition Co., 9%, 2015 (p)(z) | | | 2,684,800 | | | 705,207 |
Canwest Mediaworks, Inc., 9.25%, 2015 (a)(n) | | | 2,040,000 | | | 265,200 |
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., 10.75%, 2016 | | | 755,000 | | | 228,388 |
6
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Broadcasting - continued | | | | | | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings Ltd., 9.5%, 2016 | | $ | 1,935,000 | | $ | 2,002,725 |
Lamar Media Corp., 6.625%, 2015 | | | 1,415,000 | | | 1,245,200 |
Lamar Media Corp., “C”, 6.625%, 2015 | | | 1,820,000 | | | 1,565,200 |
LBI Media Holdings, Inc., 11%, 2013 | | | 4,375,000 | | | 2,110,938 |
LBI Media, Inc., 8.5%, 2017 (z) | | | 1,420,000 | | | 745,500 |
LIN TV Corp., 6.5%, 2013 | | | 2,050,000 | | | 1,547,750 |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 (p)(z) | | | 3,123,750 | | | 651,649 |
Newport Television LLC, 13%, 2017 (n)(p) | | | 3,495,000 | | | 442,215 |
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., 5%, 2014 (n)(p) | | | 2,450,574 | | | 857,088 |
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., 7%, 2014 | | | 811,000 | | | 317,304 |
Univision Communications, Inc., 12%, 2014 (n) | | | 230,000 | | | 244,950 |
Univision Communications, Inc., 9.75%, 2015 (n)(p) | | | 3,730,000 | | | 2,328,142 |
Young Broadcasting, Inc., 8.75%, 2014 (d) | | | 4,595,000 | | | 4,595 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 18,488,261 |
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.7% | | | | | | |
Janus Capital Group, Inc., 6.95%, 2017 | | $ | 2,075,000 | | $ | 1,853,959 |
Nuveen Investments, Inc., 10.5%, 2015 (n) | | | 2,320,000 | | | 1,647,200 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,501,159 |
Building - 1.8% | | | | | | |
Associated Materials, Inc., 9.75%, 2012 | | $ | 860,000 | | $ | 740,675 |
Associated Materials, Inc., 11.25%, 2014 | | | 2,140,000 | | | 909,500 |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 7.75%, 2014 | | | 1,940,000 | | | 1,787,225 |
Nortek, Inc., 10%, 2013 | | | 1,985,000 | | | 1,751,763 |
Nortek, Inc., 8.5%, 2014 | | | 2,040,000 | | | 734,400 |
Owens Corning, 9%, 2019 | | | 935,000 | | | 968,728 |
Ply Gem Industries, Inc., 11.75%, 2013 | | | 1,795,000 | | | 1,355,225 |
USG Corp., 9.75%, 2014 (z) | | | 135,000 | | | 137,700 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 8,385,216 |
Business Services - 1.8% | | | | | | |
First Data Corp., 9.875%, 2015 | | $ | 3,430,000 | | $ | 2,894,063 |
Iron Mountain, Inc., 6.625%, 2016 | | | 1,420,000 | | | 1,311,725 |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., 9.125%, 2013 | | | 455,000 | | | 464,100 |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., 10.25%, 2015 | | | 3,238,000 | | | 3,318,950 |
Terremark Worldwide, Inc., 12%, 2017 (n) | | | 625,000 | | | 631,250 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 8,620,088 |
Cable TV - 3.5% | | | | | | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 8.75%, 2013 | | $ | 3,145,000 | | $ | 3,137,138 |
Charter Communications Holdings LLC, 8.375%, 2014 (n) | | | 1,075,000 | | | 1,072,313 |
Charter Communications Holdings LLC, 10.875%, 2014 (n) | | | 870,000 | | | 939,600 |
7
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Cable TV - continued | | | | | | |
CSC Holdings, Inc., 8.5%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 540,000 | | $ | 556,200 |
CSC Holdings, Inc., 8.5%, 2015 (n) | | | 1,090,000 | | | 1,122,700 |
DirectTV Holdings LLC, 7.625%, 2016 | | | 4,270,000 | | | 4,323,375 |
Mediacom LLC, 9.5%, 2013 | | | 800,000 | | | 796,000 |
Videotron LTEE, 6.875%, 2014 | | | 475,000 | | | 465,500 |
Virgin Media Finance PLC, 9.5%, 2016 | | | 700,000 | | | 717,500 |
Virgin Media, Inc., 9.125%, 2016 | | | 3,244,000 | | | 3,276,440 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 16,406,766 |
Chemicals - 2.0% | | | | | | |
Dow Chemical Co., 8.55%, 2019 | | $ | 1,355,000 | | $ | 1,486,564 |
Innophos Holdings, Inc., 8.875%, 2014 | | | 2,005,000 | | | 1,904,750 |
KI Holdings, Inc., 0% to 2009, 9.875% to 2014 | | | 3,481,000 | | | 3,219,925 |
Momentive Performance Materials, Inc., 12.5%, 2014 (n) | | | 1,262,000 | | | 1,236,760 |
Momentive Performance Materials, Inc., 11.5%, 2016 | | | 1,295,000 | | | 647,500 |
Nalco Co., 8.875%, 2013 | | | 980,000 | | | 1,014,300 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 9,509,799 |
Construction - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Lennar Corp., 12.25%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 605,000 | | $ | 677,600 |
| | |
Consumer Products - 0.5% | | | | | | |
ACCO Brands Corp., 7.625%, 2015 | | $ | 610,000 | | $ | 442,250 |
Jarden Corp., 7.5%, 2017 | | | 1,650,000 | | | 1,584,000 |
Visant Holding Corp., 8.75%, 2013 | | | 390,000 | | | 391,950 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 2,418,200 |
Consumer Services - 1.9% | | | | | | |
GEO Group, Inc., 8.25%, 2013 | | $ | 1,625,000 | | $ | 1,600,625 |
KAR Holdings, Inc., 10%, 2015 | | | 2,390,000 | | | 2,103,200 |
KAR Holdings, Inc., FRN, 4.483%, 2014 | | | 815,000 | | | 660,150 |
Service Corp. International, 7%, 2017 | | | 2,870,000 | | | 2,669,100 |
Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc., 10.75%, 2016 | | | 1,885,000 | | | 1,753,050 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 8,786,125 |
Containers - 1.2% | | | | | | |
Crown Americas LLC, 7.625%, 2013 | | $ | 1,465,000 | | $ | 1,494,300 |
Graham Packaging Holdings Co., 9.875%, 2014 | | | 3,720,000 | | | 3,561,900 |
Greif, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | | | 685,000 | | | 645,613 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 5,701,813 |
Defense Electronics - 0.4% | | | | | | |
L-3 Communications Corp., 5.875%, 2015 | | $ | 2,010,000 | | $ | 1,904,475 |
8
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Electronics - 0.9% | | | | | | |
Avago Technologies Ltd., 11.875%, 2015 | | $ | 1,065,000 | | $ | 1,107,600 |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 8.875%, 2014 | | | 2,650,000 | | | 1,775,500 |
Spansion, Inc., 11.25%, 2016 (d)(n) | | | 1,705,000 | | | 1,133,825 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 4,016,925 |
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 4.9% | | | | | | |
BNDES Participacoes S.A., 6.5%, 2019 (n) | | $ | 950,000 | | $ | 961,875 |
Ecopetrol S.A., 7.625%, 2019 (z) | | | 547,000 | | | 571,615 |
Export-Import Bank of Korea, 5.875%, 2015 | | | 1,237,000 | | | 1,246,437 |
Gaz Capital S.A., 8.125%, 2014 (z) | | | 1,920,000 | | | 1,939,200 |
KazMunaiGaz Finance B.V., 8.375%, 2013 (n) | | | 509,000 | | | 477,188 |
KazMunaiGaz Finance B.V., 11.75%, 2015 (z) | | | 1,263,000 | | | 1,313,520 |
KazMunaiGaz Finance B.V., 9.125%, 2018 (n) | | | 914,000 | | | 836,310 |
Majapahit Holding B.V., 7.75%, 2016 (n) | | | 309,000 | | | 301,275 |
Majapahit Holding B.V., 7.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 723,000 | | | 683,235 |
Mubadala Development Co., 7.625%, 2019 (n) | | | 1,586,000 | | | 1,697,020 |
National Power Corp., 7.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 159,000 | | | 162,180 |
OAO Gazprom, 9.625%, 2013 | | | 1,340,000 | | | 1,437,150 |
Pemex Project Funding Master Trust, 5.75%, 2018 | | | 1,708,000 | | | 1,682,380 |
Pemex Project Funding Master Trust, 6.625%, 2035 | | | 191,000 | | | 180,346 |
Petrobras International Finance Co., 7.875%, 2019 | | | 2,370,000 | | | 2,631,411 |
Petroleos de Venezuela S.A., 5.25%, 2017 | | | 3,298,000 | | | 1,596,562 |
Petroleos Mexicanos, 8%, 2019 (n) | | | 1,062,000 | | | 1,197,405 |
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 6.5%, 2014 (n) | | | 312,000 | | | 328,623 |
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 7.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 1,069,000 | | | 1,163,907 |
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Ltd., 5.5%, 2014 (z) | | | 258,000 | | | 263,672 |
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Ltd., 6.75%, 2019 (z) | | | 256,000 | | | 266,053 |
RSHB Capital S.A., 7.125%, 2014 | | | 1,038,000 | | | 1,033,744 |
Russian Agricultural Bank, 7.125%, 2014 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | 199,180 |
TDIC Finance Ltd., 6.5%, 2014 (n) | | | 610,000 | | | 629,572 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 22,799,860 |
Emerging Market Sovereign - 4.9% | | | | | | |
Emirate of Abu Dhabi, 6.75%, 2019 (n) | | $ | 211,000 | | $ | 225,483 |
Federative Republic of Brazil, 6%, 2017 | | | 1,011,000 | | | 1,049,924 |
Federative Republic of Brazil, 5.875%, 2019 | | | 250,000 | | | 256,000 |
Federative Republic of Brazil, 7.125%, 2037 | | | 120,000 | | | 132,120 |
Federative Republic of Brazil, 11%, 2040 | | | 924,000 | | | 1,208,130 |
Republic of Argentina, 0%, 2009 | | | 549,849 | | | 545,594 |
Republic of Argentina, FRN, 1.683%, 2012 | | | 1,595,925 | | | 1,106,425 |
Republic of Colombia, 7.375%, 2019 | | | 473,000 | | | 513,205 |
Republic of Colombia, 7.375%, 2037 | | | 892,000 | | | 916,530 |
Republic of El Salvador, 8.25%, 2032 | | | 875,000 | | | 822,500 |
9
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Emerging Market Sovereign - continued | | | | | | |
Republic of Indonesia, 10.375%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 139,000 | | $ | 165,410 |
Republic of Indonesia, 6.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 675,000 | | | 685,125 |
Republic of Indonesia, 6.875%, 2018 | | | 573,000 | | | 581,595 |
Republic of Panama, 7.25%, 2015 | | | 973,000 | | | 1,060,570 |
Republic of Peru, 7.125%, 2019 | | | 270,000 | | | 292,680 |
Republic of Peru, 7.35%, 2025 | | | 333,000 | | | 360,140 |
Republic of Peru, 6.55%, 2037 | | | 860,000 | | | 847,100 |
Republic of Philippines, 6.5%, 2020 | | | 158,000 | | | 158,395 |
Republic of Philippines, 9.5%, 2030 | | | 234,000 | | | 291,915 |
Republic of Philippines, 7.75%, 2031 | | | 346,000 | | | 367,625 |
Republic of South Africa, 6.875%, 2019 | | | 174,000 | | | 190,095 |
Republic of Turkey, 7.5%, 2017 | | | 159,000 | | | 168,341 |
Republic of Turkey, 7%, 2019 | | | 883,000 | | | 903,971 |
Republic of Turkey, 7.5%, 2019 | | | 273,000 | | | 286,650 |
Republic of Turkey, 6.875%, 2036 | | | 2,843,000 | | | 2,700,850 |
Republic of Ukraine, 6.385%, 2012 | | | 560,000 | | | 461,440 |
Republic of Uruguay, 9.25%, 2017 | | | 1,349,000 | | | 1,554,723 |
Republic of Uruguay, 8%, 2022 | | | 2,331,000 | | | 2,505,825 |
Republic of Uruguay, 7.625%, 2036 | | | 236,000 | | | 238,950 |
Republic of Venezuela, 7%, 2018 | | | 824,000 | | | 494,400 |
State of Qatar, 5.15%, 2014 (n) | | | 1,077,000 | | | 1,113,349 |
State of Qatar, 6.55%, 2019 (n) | | | 760,000 | | | 798,000 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 23,003,060 |
Energy - Independent - 5.7% | | | | | | |
Berry Petroleum Co., 10.25%, 2014 | | $ | 880,000 | | $ | 919,600 |
Chaparral Energy, Inc., 8.875%, 2017 | | | 1,665,000 | | | 1,032,300 |
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 9.5%, 2015 | | | 265,000 | | | 281,231 |
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 6.375%, 2015 | | | 2,955,000 | | | 2,755,538 |
Forest Oil Corp., 8.5%, 2014 (n) | | | 750,000 | | | 761,250 |
Forest Oil Corp., 7.25%, 2019 | | | 795,000 | | | 756,244 |
Hilcorp Energy I LP, 9%, 2016 (n) | | | 2,275,000 | | | 2,093,000 |
Mariner Energy, Inc., 8%, 2017 | | | 2,390,000 | | | 2,079,300 |
McMoRan Exploration Co., 11.875%, 2014 | | | 1,965,000 | | | 1,802,888 |
Newfield Exploration Co., 6.625%, 2016 | | | 525,000 | | | 506,625 |
OPTI Canada, Inc., 8.25%, 2014 | | | 2,360,000 | | | 1,557,600 |
Penn Virginia Corp., 10.375%, 2016 | | | 1,650,000 | | | 1,759,313 |
Petrohawk Energy Corp., 10.5%, 2014 (n) | | | 925,000 | | | 989,750 |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 7%, 2017 | | | 2,755,000 | | | 2,610,363 |
Quicksilver Resources, Inc., 8.25%, 2015 | | | 1,100,000 | | | 1,056,000 |
Quicksilver Resources, Inc., 7.125%, 2016 | | | 1,850,000 | | | 1,554,000 |
Range Resources Corp., 8%, 2019 | | | 1,505,000 | | | 1,531,338 |
10
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Energy - Independent - continued | | | | | | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., 9.875%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 450,000 | | $ | 454,500 |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., 8%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,470,000 | | | 2,247,700 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 26,748,540 |
Entertainment - 0.9% | | | | | | |
AMC Entertainment, Inc., 11%, 2016 | | $ | 1,740,000 | | $ | 1,757,400 |
AMC Entertainment, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,000,000 | | | 1,970,000 |
Cinemark USA, Inc., 8.625%, 2019 (n) | | | 520,000 | | | 538,200 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 4,265,600 |
Financial Institutions - 1.6% | | | | | | |
GMAC LLC, 6.875%, 2011 (n) | | $ | 4,286,000 | | $ | 3,953,835 |
GMAC LLC, 7%, 2012 (n) | | | 835,000 | | | 755,675 |
GMAC LLC, 6.75%, 2014 (n) | | | 1,450,000 | | | 1,247,000 |
GMAC LLC, 8%, 2031 (n) | | | 1,418,000 | | | 1,084,770 |
International Lease Finance Corp., 5.625%, 2013 | | | 655,000 | | | 457,104 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 7,498,384 |
Food & Beverages - 1.6% | | | | | | |
ARAMARK Corp., 8.5%, 2015 | | $ | 1,070,000 | | $ | 1,078,025 |
B&G Foods, Inc., 8%, 2011 | | | 1,525,000 | | | 1,532,625 |
Dean Foods Co., 7%, 2016 | | | 1,485,000 | | | 1,399,613 |
Del Monte Corp., 6.75%, 2015 | | | 2,180,000 | | | 2,120,050 |
Independencia International, 9.875%, 2015 (d)(n) | | | 568,000 | | | 62,480 |
Michael Foods, Inc., 8%, 2013 | | | 1,400,000 | | | 1,403,500 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 7,596,293 |
Forest & Paper Products - 2.5% | | | | | | |
Abitibi-Consolidated, Inc., 7.4%, 2018 (d) | | $ | 1,870,000 | | $ | 177,650 |
Cellu Tissue Holdings, Inc., 11.5%, 2014 (z) | | | 1,820,000 | | | 1,820,000 |
Celulosa Arauco y Constitucion S.A., 7.25%, 2019 (z) | | | 145,000 | | | 150,191 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 7.125%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,835,000 | | | 2,764,125 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 8%, 2024 | | | 885,000 | | | 789,863 |
Graphic Packaging International Corp., 9.5%, 2013 | | | 1,505,000 | | | 1,499,356 |
Jefferson Smurfit Corp., 8.25%, 2012 (d) | | | 975,000 | | | 492,375 |
JSG Funding PLC, 7.75%, 2015 | | | 1,365,000 | | | 1,112,475 |
Millar Western Forest Products Ltd., 7.75%, 2013 | | | 4,965,000 | | | 2,432,850 |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., 8%, 2017 (d) | | | 618,000 | | | 310,545 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 11,549,430 |
Gaming & Lodging - 5.8% | | | | | | |
Ameristar Casinos, Inc., 9.25%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 700,000 | | $ | 721,000 |
Boyd Gaming Corp., 6.75%, 2014 | | | 2,290,000 | | | 2,043,825 |
11
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Gaming & Lodging - continued | | | | | | |
Firekeepers Development Authority, 13.875%, 2015 (n) | | $ | 2,355,000 | | $ | 2,355,000 |
Fontainebleau Las Vegas Holdings LLC, 10.25%, 2015 (d)(n) | | | 3,510,000 | | | 105,300 |
Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc., 11.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,040,000 | | | 1,053,000 |
Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc., 10%, 2018 (n) | | | 3,821,000 | | | 2,674,700 |
Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc., 10%, 2018 (n) | | | 679,000 | | | 475,300 |
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., 7.125%, 2013 | | | 895,000 | | | 868,150 |
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., 6.75%, 2016 | | | 815,000 | | | 755,914 |
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., 9%, 2017 (n) | | | 650,000 | | | 654,875 |
MGM Mirage, 6.75%, 2013 | | | 2,110,000 | | | 1,608,875 |
MGM Mirage, 5.875%, 2014 | | | 1,230,000 | | | 885,600 |
MGM Mirage, 10.375%, 2014 (n) | | | 260,000 | | | 278,850 |
MGM Mirage, 7.5%, 2016 | | | 1,280,000 | | | 934,400 |
MGM Mirage, 11.125%, 2017 (n) | | | 640,000 | | | 704,000 |
MTR Gaming Group, Inc., 9%, 2012 | | | 970,000 | | | 712,950 |
Newland International Properties Corp., 9.5%, 2014 (n) | | | 1,948,000 | | | 1,305,160 |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 7.5%, 2015 | | | 4,550,000 | | | 4,038,125 |
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 7%, 2013 | | | 970,000 | | | 868,148 |
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 11.875%, 2015 | | | 680,000 | | | 700,400 |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., 7.875%, 2012 | | | 465,000 | | | 465,000 |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., 6.75%, 2018 | | | 600,000 | | | 540,000 |
Station Casinos, Inc., 6%, 2012 (d) | | | 2,359,000 | | | 707,700 |
Station Casinos, Inc., 6.5%, 2014 (d) | | | 3,810,000 | | | 57,150 |
Station Casinos, Inc., 6.875%, 2016 (d) | | | 6,275,000 | | | 94,125 |
Station Casinos, Inc., 7.75%, 2016 (d) | | | 821,000 | | | 246,300 |
Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, Inc., 8.5%, 2015 (d) | | | 883,000 | | | 114,790 |
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 6%, 2016 | | | 1,555,000 | | | 1,318,271 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 27,286,908 |
Industrial - 0.8% | | | | | | |
Baldor Electric Co., 8.625%, 2017 | | $ | 1,095,000 | | $ | 1,097,738 |
JohnsonDiversey, Inc., 9.625%, 2012 | | EUR | 840,000 | | | 1,095,486 |
JohnsonDiversey, Inc., “B”, 9.625%, 2012 | | $ | 1,425,000 | | | 1,446,375 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,639,599 |
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 0.6% | | | | | | |
USI Holdings Corp., 9.75%, 2015 (z) | | $ | 4,015,000 | | $ | 2,951,025 |
| | |
International Market Sovereign - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Korea National Oil Corp., 5.375%, 2014 (z) | | $ | 1,027,000 | | $ | 1,048,824 |
| | |
Major Banks - 1.4% | | | | | | |
Bank of America Corp., 8% to 2018, FRN to 2059 | | $ | 3,060,000 | | $ | 2,617,187 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 7.9% to 2018, FRN to 2049 | | | 3,795,000 | | | 3,607,185 |
12
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Major Banks - continued | | | | | | |
Kookmin Bank, 7.25%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 500,000 | | $ | 536,488 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 6,760,860 |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 6.6% | | | | | | |
Accellent, Inc., 10.5%, 2013 | | $ | 2,320,000 | | $ | 2,140,200 |
Biomet, Inc., 11.625%, 2017 | | | 2,800,000 | | | 3,038,000 |
Community Health Systems, Inc., 8.875%, 2015 | | | 3,180,000 | | | 3,275,400 |
Cooper Cos., Inc., 7.125%, 2015 | | | 320,000 | | | 300,800 |
DaVita, Inc., 6.625%, 2013 | | | 748,000 | | | 734,910 |
DaVita, Inc., 7.25%, 2015 | | | 1,641,000 | | | 1,608,180 |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, 9%, 2015 (n) | | | 1,265,000 | | | 1,366,200 |
HCA, Inc., 9%, 2014 | | | 4,680,000 | | | 4,375,800 |
HCA, Inc., 6.375%, 2015 | | | 2,325,000 | | | 2,057,625 |
HCA, Inc., 9.25%, 2016 | | | 925,000 | | | 964,313 |
HCA, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 1,085,000 | | | 1,112,125 |
Psychiatric Solutions, Inc., 7.75%, 2015 (n) | | | 260,000 | | | 239,850 |
Psychiatric Solutions, Inc., 7.75%, 2015 | | | 1,805,000 | | | 1,710,238 |
Surgical Care Affiliates, Inc., 10%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,815,000 | | | 1,998,650 |
U.S. Oncology, Inc., 10.75%, 2014 | | | 1,695,000 | | | 1,678,050 |
Universal Hospital Services, Inc., 8.5%, 2015 (p) | | | 1,910,000 | | | 1,852,700 |
Universal Hospital Services, Inc., FRN, 4.635%, 2015 | | | 590,000 | | | 495,600 |
Vwr Funding, Inc., 11.25%, 2015 (p) | | | 2,045,000 | | | 1,786,819 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 30,735,460 |
Metals & Mining - 1.9% | | | | | | |
Arch Western Finance LLC, 6.75%, 2013 | | $ | 1,210,000 | | $ | 1,173,700 |
FMG Finance Ltd., 10.625%, 2016 (n) | | | 2,245,000 | | | 2,317,963 |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 8.375%, 2017 | | | 2,855,000 | | | 3,026,300 |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., FRN, 4.995%, 2015 | | | 934,000 | | | 898,377 |
Peabody Energy Corp., 5.875%, 2016 | | | 10,000 | | | 9,300 |
Peabody Energy Corp., 7.375%, 2016 | | | 1,640,000 | | | 1,648,200 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 9,073,840 |
Natural Gas - Distribution - 0.3% | | | | | | |
AmeriGas Partners LP, 7.125%, 2016 | | $ | 1,515,000 | | $ | 1,469,550 |
| | |
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 1.9% | | | | | | |
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP, 8.125%, 2015 | | $ | 1,345,000 | | $ | 1,102,900 |
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP, 8.75%, 2018 | | | 1,655,000 | | | 1,324,000 |
Deutsche Bank (El Paso Performance-Linked Trust, CLN), 7.75%, 2011 (n) | | | 345,000 | | | 340,249 |
El Paso Corp., 8.25%, 2016 | | | 1,230,000 | | | 1,254,600 |
El Paso Corp., 7.25%, 2018 | | | 1,785,000 | | | 1,733,856 |
13
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Natural Gas - Pipeline - continued | | | | | | |
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 6.875%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 1,280,000 | | $ | 1,126,400 |
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 8.75%, 2018 | | | 300,000 | | | 279,000 |
Williams Partners LP, 7.25%, 2017 | | | 1,955,000 | | | 1,915,900 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 9,076,905 |
Network & Telecom - 2.7% | | | | | | |
Cincinnati Bell, Inc., 8.375%, 2014 | | $ | 3,155,000 | | $ | 3,123,450 |
Citizens Communications Co., 9.25%, 2011 | | | 595,000 | | | 613,594 |
Global Village Telecom Finance LLC, 12%, 2011 (n) | | | 455,000 | | | 466,944 |
Nordic Telephone Co. Holdings, 8.875%, 2016 (n) | | | 2,037,000 | | | 2,067,555 |
Qwest Communications International, Inc., 7.25%, 2011 | | | 1,470,000 | | | 1,455,300 |
Qwest Corp., 7.875%, 2011 | | | 1,400,000 | | | 1,428,000 |
Qwest Corp., 8.375%, 2016 (n) | | | 646,000 | | | 662,150 |
Telemar Norte Leste S.A., 9.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 942,000 | | | 1,070,348 |
Windstream Corp., 8.625%, 2016 | | | 1,800,000 | | | 1,827,000 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 12,714,341 |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 0.0% | | | | | | |
Woori America Bank, 7%, 2015 (z) | | $ | 152,000 | | $ | 158,840 |
| | |
Precious Metals & Minerals - 0.7% | | | | | | |
Teck Resources Ltd., 9.75%, 2014 (n) | | $ | 655,000 | | $ | 728,688 |
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.75%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,140,000 | | | 2,490,425 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,219,113 |
Printing & Publishing - 1.3% | | | | | | |
American Media Operations, Inc., 9%, 2013 (p)(z) | | $ | 239,155 | | $ | 114,256 |
American Media Operations, Inc., 14%, 2013 (p)(z) | | | 2,496,794 | | | 1,160,246 |
Dex Media West LLC, 9.875%, 2013 (d) | | | 4,175,000 | | | 772,375 |
Idearc, Inc., 8%, 2016 (d) | | | 2,558,000 | | | 111,913 |
Morris Publishing, 7%, 2013 (d) | | | 2,470,000 | | | 172,900 |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 10%, 2014 | | | 1,450,000 | | | 1,457,250 |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 11.5%, 2016 | | | 1,010,000 | | | 1,057,975 |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 0% to 2011, 12.5% to 2016 | | | 1,456,000 | | | 1,059,240 |
Quebecor World, Inc., 6.125%, 2013 (d) | | | 2,060,000 | | | 175,100 |
Tribune Co., 5.25%, 2015 (d) | | | 1,240,000 | | | 69,750 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 6,151,005 |
Railroad & Shipping - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Kansas City Southern Railway, 8%, 2015 | | $ | 600,000 | | $ | 582,000 |
| | |
Real Estate - 0.3% | | | | | | |
CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., 11.625%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 1,205,000 | | $ | 1,211,025 |
14
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Retailers - 2.5% | | | | | | |
Couche-Tard, Inc., 7.5%, 2013 | | $ | 635,000 | | $ | 634,206 |
Dollar General Corp., 11.875%, 2017 (p) | | | 915,000 | | | 1,024,800 |
General Nutrition Centers, Inc., FRN, 6.404%, 2014 (p) | | | 2,345,000 | | | 2,069,463 |
Limited Brands, Inc., 5.25%, 2014 | | | 1,170,000 | | | 1,007,776 |
Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc., 5.35%, 2012 | | | 515,000 | | | 505,085 |
Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc., 5.75%, 2014 | | | 1,210,000 | | | 1,118,150 |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., 10.375%, 2015 | | | 1,135,000 | | | 817,200 |
Rite Aid Corp., 9.75%, 2016 (n) | | | 985,000 | | | 1,039,175 |
Rite Aid Corp., 7.5%, 2017 | | | 810,000 | | | 692,550 |
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., 10.5%, 2016 | | | 1,590,000 | | | 1,637,700 |
Toys “R” Us, Inc., 10.75%, 2017 (z) | | | 1,205,000 | | | 1,235,125 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 11,781,230 |
Specialty Chemicals - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Ashland, Inc., 9.125%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 1,750,000 | | $ | 1,846,250 |
| | |
Specialty Stores - 0.5% | | | | | | |
Michaels Stores, Inc., 10%, 2014 | | $ | 240,000 | | $ | 225,600 |
Payless ShoeSource, Inc., 8.25%, 2013 | | | 2,035,000 | | | 1,973,950 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 2,199,550 |
Supermarkets - 0.2% | | | | | | |
SUPERVALU, Inc., 8%, 2016 | | $ | 860,000 | | $ | 853,550 |
| | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - 2.7% | | | | | | |
Cricket Communications, Inc., 7.75%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 1,000,000 | | $ | 995,000 |
Crown Castle International Corp., 9%, 2015 | | | 855,000 | | | 903,094 |
Crown Castle International Corp., 7.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 665,000 | | | 678,300 |
Digicel Group Ltd., 12%, 2014 (n) | | | 112,000 | | | 118,160 |
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 9.25%, 2014 | | | 1,455,000 | | | 1,505,925 |
Nextel Communications, Inc., 6.875%, 2013 | | | 2,650,000 | | | 2,418,125 |
SBA Telecommunications, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 (z) | | | 405,000 | | | 411,075 |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 8.375%, 2012 | | | 1,275,000 | | | 1,290,938 |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 8.75%, 2032 | | | 650,000 | | | 559,813 |
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 10.75%, 2015 (z) | | | 3,500,000 | | | 3,710,000 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 12,590,430 |
Telephone Services - 0.3% | | | | | | |
Frontier Communications Corp., 8.25%, 2014 | | $ | 1,200,000 | | $ | 1,215,000 |
15
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | |
Tobacco - 0.5% | | | | | | |
Alliance One International, Inc., 10%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 965,000 | | $ | 950,525 |
Altria Group, Inc., 9.7%, 2018 | | | 1,080,000 | | | 1,313,293 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 2,263,818 |
Transportation - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Peru Enhanced Pass-Through Trust, 0%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 322,735 | | $ | 232,369 |
| | |
Transportation - Services - 1.0% | | | | | | |
Commercial Barge Line Co., 12.5%, 2017 (z) | | $ | 1,000,000 | | $ | 957,500 |
Eurocar Groupe S.A., FRN, 4.781%, 2013 (n) | | EUR | 1,560,000 | | | 1,578,662 |
Hertz Corp., 8.875%, 2014 | | $ | 2,045,000 | | | 1,968,313 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 4,504,475 |
Utilities - Electric Power - 4.8% | | | | | | |
AES Corp., 8%, 2017 | | $ | 2,950,000 | | $ | 2,891,000 |
Calpine Corp., 8%, 2016 (n) | | | 1,260,000 | | | 1,266,300 |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc., 7.5%, 2015 | | | 1,795,000 | | | 1,570,627 |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc., 7.75%, 2019 | | | 1,585,000 | | | 1,262,056 |
Edison Mission Energy, 7%, 2017 | | | 2,275,000 | | | 1,811,469 |
ELETROBRAS S.A., 6.875%, 2019 (z) | | | 124,000 | | | 125,395 |
Enersis S.A., 7.375%, 2014 | | | 709,000 | | | 766,286 |
ISA Capital do Brasil S.A., 8.8%, 2017 | | | 909,000 | | | 948,769 |
Mirant Americas Generation LLC, 8.5%, 2021 | | | 1,250,000 | | | 1,056,250 |
Mirant North America LLC, 7.375%, 2013 | | | 665,000 | | | 656,688 |
NGC Corp. Capital Trust, 8.316%, 2027 | | | 1,975,000 | | | 967,750 |
NRG Energy, Inc., 7.375%, 2016 | | | 5,115,000 | | | 4,948,763 |
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings LLC, 10.25%, 2015 | | | 5,135,000 | | | 4,030,975 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 22,302,328 |
Utilities - Gas - 0.0% | | | | | | |
Empresas Publicas de Medellin, 7.625%, 2019 (z) | | $ | 200,000 | | $ | 207,400 |
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $489,940,800) | | | | | $ | 416,340,311 |
| | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - 6.0% | | | | | | |
Aerospace - 0.5% | | | | | | |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Co., Letter of Credit, 2.59%, 2014 | | $ | 150,780 | | $ | 101,871 |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Co., Term Loan B, 2.38%, 2014 | | | 3,567,487 | | | 2,410,283 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 2,512,154 |
Automotive - 1.2% | | | | | | |
Accuride Corp., Term Loan B, 3.42%, 2012 | | $ | 243,284 | | $ | 222,605 |
Federal Mogul Corp., Term Loan B, 2.24%, 2014 | | | 2,171,063 | | | 1,636,439 |
16
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - continued | | | | | | |
Automotive - continued | | | | | | |
Ford Motor Co., Term Loan B, 3.49%, 2013 | | $ | 4,375,929 | | $ | 3,709,816 |
Mark IV Industries, Inc., Second Lien Term Loan, 8.93%, 2011 (d) | | | 3,589,759 | | | 38,141 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 5,607,001 |
Broadcasting - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Gray Television, Inc., Term Loan B, 3.81%, 2014 | | $ | 886,183 | | $ | 556,634 |
Young Broadcasting, Inc., Term Loan B, 4.75%, 2012 (d) | | | 2,135,540 | | | 1,034,212 |
Young Broadcasting, Inc., Term Loan B-1, 4.75%, 2012 (d) | | | 788,102 | | | 381,667 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 1,972,513 |
Building - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Building Materials Corp., Term Loan B, 3.06%, 2014 | | $ | 243,010 | | $ | 217,393 |
Roofing Supply Group, Inc., Term Loan B, 7.24%, 2013 | | | 2,151,291 | | | 1,656,494 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 1,873,887 |
Business Services - 0.8% | | | | | | |
First Data Corp., Term Loan B-1, 3.03%, 2014 | | $ | 4,199,498 | | $ | 3,527,578 |
| | |
Cable TV - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Charter Communications Operating LLC, Term Loan B, 6.25%, 2014 | | $ | 1,102,679 | | $ | 1,029,075 |
| | |
Electronics - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Term Loan B, 2.05%, 2013 | | $ | 840,981 | | $ | 618,421 |
| | |
Gaming & Lodging - 0.3% | | | | | | |
Green Valley Ranch Gaming LLC, Seond Lien Term Loan, 3.87%, 2014 | | $ | 5,131,694 | | $ | 872,388 |
MGM Mirage, Term Loan B, 2011 (o) | | | 527,121 | | | 432,972 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 1,305,360 |
Printing & Publishing - 0.3% | | | | | | |
Tribune Co., Term Loan B, 6.5%, 2014 (d) | | $ | 3,327,162 | | $ | 1,258,083 |
| | |
Retailers - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Toys “R” Us, Term Loan, 4.53%, 2012 | | $ | 575,648 | | $ | 552,828 |
| | |
Specialty Chemicals - 0.3% | | | | | | |
LyondellBasell Dutch Tranche Revolving Credit Loan, 3.78%, 2014 (o) | | $ | 35,133 | | $ | 15,151 |
LyondellBasell Dutch Tranche Term Loan A, 3.78%, 2014 (o) | | | 81,605 | | | 35,192 |
LyondellBasell German Term Loan B-1, 4.03%, 2014 (o) | | | 100,867 | | | 43,499 |
LyondellBasell German Term Loan B-2, 4.03%, 2014 (o) | | | 100,853 | | | 43,493 |
LyondellBasell German Term Loan B-3, 4.03%, 2014 (o) | | | 100,853 | | | 43,493 |
17
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - continued | | | | | | |
Specialty Chemicals - continued | | | | | | |
LyondellBasell Second Priority DIP Term Loan, 5.81%, 2014 | | $ | 295,649 | | $ | 248,099 |
LyondellBasell Super Priority DIP Term Loan, 9%, 2009 (q) | | | 295,941 | | | 305,682 |
LyondellBasell Term Loan B-1, 4.03%, 2014 (o) | | | 437,415 | | | 188,635 |
LyondellBasell Term Loan B-2, 4.03%, 2014 (o) | | | 437,420 | | | 188,638 |
LyondellBasell Term Loan B-3, 4.03%, 2014 (o) | | | 437,420 | | | 188,638 |
LyondellBasell U.S. Tranche Revolving Credit Loan, 3.78%, 2014 (o) | | | 131,729 | | | 56,808 |
LyondellBasell U.S. Tranche Term Loan A, 3.78%, 2014 (o) | | | 251,028 | | | 108,256 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 1,465,584 |
Specialty Stores - 0.4% | | | | | | |
Michaels Stores, Inc., Term Loan B, 2.56%, 2013 | | $ | 2,081,833 | | $ | 1,707,846 |
| | |
Utilities - Electric Power - 1.0% | | | | | | |
Calpine Corp., Term Loan, 3.47%, 2014 | | $ | 1,512,487 | | $ | 1,387,707 |
TXU Corp. Term Loan B-3, 3.8%, 2014 | | | 4,590,209 | | | 3,520,832 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 4,908,539 |
Total Floating Rate Loans (Identified Cost, $39,613,131) | | | | | $ | 28,338,869 |
| | |
Common Stocks - 1.5% | | | | | | |
Automotive - 0.0% | | | | | | |
Oxford Automotive, Inc. (a) | | | 29 | | $ | 0 |
| | |
Cable TV - 0.9% | | | | | | |
Cablevision Systems Corp., “A” | | | 60,000 | | $ | 1,228,200 |
Comcast Corp., “A” | | | 159,800 | | | 2,374,628 |
Time Warner Cable, Inc. | | | 11,066 | | | 365,842 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | $ | 3,968,670 |
Containers - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Owens-Illinois, Inc. (a) | | | 12,400 | | $ | 420,856 |
| | |
Energy - Independent - 0.0% | | | | | | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (a) | | | 490 | | $ | 4,582 |
| | |
Energy - Integrated - 0.2% | | | | | | |
Chevron Corp. | | | 14,100 | | $ | 979,527 |
| | |
Gaming & Lodging - 0.1% | | | | | | |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (a) | | | 63,100 | | $ | 632,893 |
18
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | Value ($) |
| | | | | |
Common Stocks - continued | | | | | |
Printing & Publishing - 0.0% | | | | | |
American Media, Inc. | | 45,771 | | $ | 61,333 |
| | |
Telephone Services - 0.2% | | | | | |
Windstream Corp. | | 88,700 | | $ | 777,899 |
Total Common Stocks (Identified Cost, $9,621,444) | | | | $ | 6,845,760 |
| | |
Preferred Stocks - 0.6% | | | | | |
Broadcasting - 0.0% | | | | | |
Spanish Broadcasting Systems, Inc., “B”, 10.75% | | 2,028 | | $ | 53,278 |
| | |
Financial Institutions - 0.1% | | | | | |
Preferred Blocker, Inc., 7% (z) | | 1,119 | | $ | 515,265 |
| | |
Major Banks - 0.5% | | | | | |
Bank of America Corp., 8.63% | | 99,325 | | $ | 2,256,664 |
Total Preferred Stocks (Identified Cost, $5,287,492) | | | | $ | 2,825,207 |
| | |
Money Market Funds (v) - 1.4% | | | | | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.21%, at Cost and Net Asset Value | | 6,570,250 | | $ | 6,570,250 |
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $551,033,117) | | | | $ | 460,920,397 |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 1.8% | | | | | 8,618,397 |
Net Assets - 100.0% | | | | $ | 469,538,794 |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(d) | Non-income producing security – in default. |
(e) | The rate shown represents a current effective yield, not a coupon rate. |
(g) | The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on settled positions at period end, unless otherwise indicated. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $84,977,987, representing 18.1% of net assets. |
(o) | All or a portion of this position has not settled. Upon settlement date, interest rates for unsettled amounts will be determined. The rate shown represents the weighted average coupon rate for settled amounts. |
(p) | Payment-in-kind security. |
(q) | All or a portion of this position represents an unfunded loan commitment. The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on the full position, including the unfunded loan commitment which has no current coupon rate. |
19
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(r) | Remaining maturities of floating rate loans may be less than stated maturities shown as a result of contractual or optional prepayments by the borrower. Such prepayments cannot be predicted with certainty. These loans may be subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans generally have rates of interest which are determined periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium. |
(v) | Underlying fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
| | | | | | |
Restricted Securities | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | Current Market Value |
American Media Operations, Inc., 9%, 2013 | | 1/30/09 | | $152,747 | | $114,256 |
American Media Operations, Inc., 14%, 2013 | | 1/30/09 | | 1,349,939 | | 1,160,246 |
Anthracite Ltd., CDO, 6%, 2037 | | 5/14/02 | | 1,276,764 | | 120,000 |
Arbor Realty Mortgage Securities, CDO, FRN, 2.804%, 2038 | | 12/20/05 | | 1,245,520 | | 49,820 |
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “H”, 6.077%, 2045 | | 7/21/04 | | 898,037 | | 61,539 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 6.397%, 2018 | | 6/19/08 | | 2,843,174 | | 283,092 |
Bonten Media Acquisition Co., 9%, 2015 | | 5/22/07 | | 2,689,694 | | 705,207 |
Cellu Tissue Holdings, Inc., 11.5%, 2014 | | 5/19/09 | | 1,755,465 | | 1,820,000 |
Celulosa Arauco y Constitucion S.A., 7.25%, 2019 | | 7/22/09 | | 143,421 | | 150,191 |
Commercial Barge Line Co., 12.5%, 2017 | | 7/01/09 | | 952,043 | | 957,500 |
ELETROBRAS S.A., 6.875%, 2019 | | 7/23/09 | | 122,899 | | 125,395 |
Ecopetrol S.A., 7.625%, 2019 | | 7/16/09 | | 545,045 | | 571,615 |
Empresas Publicas de Medellin, 7.625%, 2019 | | 7/22/09 | | 196,585 | | 207,400 |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.693%, 2025 | | 1/29/03 | | 161,147 | | 102,193 |
Gaz Capital S.A., 8.125%, 2014 | | 7/22/09 | | 1,920,000 | | 1,939,200 |
KazMunaiGaz Finance B.V., 11.75%, 2015 | | 7/16/09 | | 1,250,586 | | 1,313,520 |
Korea National Oil Corp., 5.375%, 2014 | | 7/23/09 | | 1,020,269 | | 1,048,824 |
LBI Media, Inc., 8.5%, 2017 | | 7/18/07 | | 1,399,833 | | 745,500 |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 | | 11/09/07-12/11/07 | | 3,030,291 | | 651,649 |
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., 1.276%, 2039 | | 7/20/04 | | 138,321 | | 86,948 |
Preferred Blocker, Inc., 7% (Preferred Stock), 0 | | 12/29/08 | | 861,630 | | 515,265 |
Preferred Term Securities XII Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2033 | | 1/07/05 | | 1,376,758 | | 178 |
Preferred Term Securities XVI Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2035 | | 12/08/04 | | 2,573,173 | | 325 |
Preferred Term Securities XVII Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2035 | | 3/09/05 | | 1,419,521 | | 181 |
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Ltd., 5.5%, 2014 | | 7/16/09 | | 257,401 | | 263,672 |
20
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Restricted Securities (continued) | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | Current Market Value |
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Ltd., 6.75%, 2019 | | 7/16/09 | | $255,221 | | $266,053 |
SBA Telecommunications, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | | 7/21/09 | | 401,570 | | 411,075 |
Toys “R” Us, Inc., 10.75%, 2017 | | 7/01/09 | | 1,173,812 | | 1,235,125 |
USG Corp., 9.75%, 2014 | | 7/30/09 | | 132,416 | | 137,700 |
USI Holdings Corp., 9.75%, 2015 | | 4/26/07-11/28/07 | | 3,916,334 | | 2,951,025 |
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 10.75%, 2015 | | 11/22/05-3/19/08 | | 3,592,360 | | 3,710,000 |
Woori America Bank, 7%, 2015 | | 7/27/09 | | 151,359 | | 158,840 |
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | $21,863,534 |
% of Net Assets | | | | | | 4.7% |
Derivative Contracts at 7/31/09
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 7/31/09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type | | Currency | | Counterparty | | Contracts to Deliver/ Receive | | Settlement Date Range | | In Exchange For | | Contracts at Value | | Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Liability Derivatives | | | | | | | | | |
SELL | | EUR | | HSBC Bank | | 1,377,000 | | 9/17/09 | | $1,939,443 | | $1,962,712 | | $(23,269 | ) |
SELL | | EUR | | UBS AG | | 3,230,208 | | 9/17/09 | | $4,551,557 | | $4,604,188 | | (52,631 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $(75,900 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At July 31, 2009, the fund had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover any commitments under these derivative contracts.
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
CLO | | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | | Public Limited Company |
REIT | | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Abbreviations indicate amounts shown in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. All amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. A list of abbreviations is shown below:
See Notes to Financial Statements
21
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 7/31/09 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
| | | |
Assets | | | |
Investments- | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $544,462,867) | | $454,350,147 | |
Underlying funds, at cost and value | | 6,570,250 | |
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $551,033,117) | | $460,920,397 | |
Cash | | 171,056 | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $33,989) | | 28,161 | |
Receivables for | | | |
Investments sold | | 1,086,341 | |
Fund shares sold | | 2,812,867 | |
Interest and dividends | | 9,483,345 | |
Receivable from investment adviser | | 78,959 | |
Other assets | | 2,376 | |
Total assets | | $474,583,502 | |
Liabilities | | | |
Payables for | | | |
Distributions | | $1,210,718 | |
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | 75,900 | |
Investments purchased | | 2,240,461 | |
Fund shares reacquired | | 1,303,898 | |
Payable to affiliates | | | |
Investment adviser | | 16,506 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | 155,739 | |
Distribution and service fees | | 11,146 | |
Administrative services fee | | 492 | |
Payable for independent trustees’ compensation | | 5,274 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | 24,574 | |
Total liabilities | | $5,044,708 | |
Net assets | | $469,538,794 | |
Net assets consist of | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $669,309,113 | |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | (90,182,928 | ) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | | (107,449,540 | ) |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | (2,137,851 | ) |
Net assets | | $469,538,794 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | | 87,702,510 | |
| | | | | | |
| | Net assets | | Shares outstanding | | Net asset value per share (a) |
Class A | | $328,543,961 | | 61,374,045 | | $5.35 |
Class B | | 50,408,789 | | 9,390,040 | | 5.37 |
Class C | | 73,151,804 | | 13,688,082 | | 5.34 |
Class I | | 16,051,989 | | 2,992,091 | | 5.36 |
Class W | | 267,397 | | 49,960 | | 5.35 |
Class R1 | | 90,396 | | 16,841 | | 5.37 |
Class R2 | | 94,011 | | 17,513 | | 5.37 |
Class R3 | | 841,319 | | 157,292 | | 5.35 |
Class R4 | | 89,128 | | 16,646 | | 5.35 |
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares.
(a) | Maximum offering price and redemption price per share were equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Class A, for which the maximum offering price per share was $5.62. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
22
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | | |
Income | | | | | | |
Interest | | $22,476,693 | | | | |
Dividends | | 421,886 | | | | |
Dividends from underlying funds | | 10,211 | | | | |
Foreign taxes withheld | | (937 | ) | | | |
Total investment income | | | | | $22,907,853 | |
Expenses | | | | | | |
Management fee | | $1,290,886 | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | 882,696 | | | | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | 350,314 | | | | |
Administrative services fee | | 42,174 | | | | |
Independent trustees’ compensation | | 9,480 | | | | |
Custodian fee | | 33,194 | | | | |
Shareholder communications | | 33,163 | | | | |
Auditing fees | | 33,657 | | | | |
Legal fees | | 9,566 | | | | |
Miscellaneous | | 72,376 | | | | |
Total expenses | | | | | $2,757,506 | |
Fees paid indirectly | | (13,083 | ) | | | |
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser | | (586,478 | ) | | | |
Net expenses | | | | | $2,157,945 | |
Net investment income | | | | | $20,749,908 | |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | | | | | | |
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) Investment transactions | | $(24,558,458 | ) | | | |
Swap transactions | | (6,287,180 | ) | | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | 109,358 | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | | | | | $(30,736,280 | ) |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) Investments | | $109,511,544 | | | | |
Swap transactions | | 5,277,344 | | | | |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | (591,730 | ) | | | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | | | $114,197,158 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | | | $83,460,878 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | | | $104,210,786 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
| | | | | | |
Change in net assets | | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Year ended 1/31/09 | |
From operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $20,749,908 | | | $51,905,758 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | | (30,736,280 | ) | | (61,404,311 | ) |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | 114,197,158 | | | (160,957,654 | ) |
Change in net assets from operations | | $104,210,786 | | | $(170,456,207 | ) |
Distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(23,726,192 | ) | | $(53,290,582 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments | | — | | | (448,408 | ) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(23,726,192 | ) | | $(53,738,990 | ) |
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | | $1,873,440 | | | $(65,923,727 | ) |
Total change in net assets | | $82,358,034 | | | $(290,118,924 | ) |
Net assets | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | | 387,180,760 | | | 677,299,684 | |
At end of period (including accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $2,137,851 and undistributed net investment income of $838,433, respectively) | | $469,538,794 | | | $387,180,760 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Financial Statements
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class A | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $4.42 | | | $6.90 | | | $7.66 | | | $7.40 | | | $7.63 | | | $7.65 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.24 | | | $0.57 | | | $0.58 | | | $0.56 | | | $0.56 | | | $0.57 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.97 | | | (2.46 | ) | | (0.70 | ) | | 0.28 | | | (0.16 | ) | | 0.08 | |
Total from investment operations | | $1.21 | | | $(1.89 | ) | | $(0.12 | ) | | $0.84 | | | $0.40 | | | $0.65 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.59 | ) | | $(0.59 | ) | | $(0.58 | ) | | $(0.59 | ) | | $(0.59 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | (0.05 | ) | | — | | | (0.04 | ) | | (0.08 | ) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.59 | ) | | $(0.64 | ) | | $(0.58 | ) | | $(0.63 | ) | | $(0.67 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $5.35 | | | $4.42 | | | $6.90 | | | $7.66 | | | $7.40 | | | $7.63 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 28.46 | (n) | | (28.79 | ) | | (1.88 | ) | | 11.89 | | | 5.55 | | | 8.98 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.21 | (a) | | 1.24 | | | 1.19 | | | 1.27 | | | 1.29 | | | 1.29 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 0.91 | (a) | | 0.85 | | | 0.85 | | | 0.85 | | | 0.85 | | | 0.87 | |
Net investment income | | 10.62 | (a) | | 9.54 | | | 7.70 | | | 7.53 | | | 7.51 | | | 7.62 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 30 | | | 72 | | | 79 | | | 85 | | | 66 | | | 69 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $328,544 | | | $276,917 | | | $458,651 | | | $488,673 | | | $338,568 | | | $278,886 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class B | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $4.43 | | | $6.92 | | | $7.68 | | | $7.42 | | | $7.65 | | | $7.67 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.23 | | | $0.53 | | | $0.53 | | | $0.52 | | | $0.51 | | | $0.53 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.97 | | | (2.47 | ) | | (0.70 | ) | | 0.28 | | | (0.16 | ) | | 0.07 | |
Total from investment operations | | $1.20 | | | $(1.94 | ) | | $(0.17 | ) | | $0.80 | | | $0.35 | | | $0.60 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.55 | ) | | $(0.54 | ) | | $(0.54 | ) | | $(0.54 | ) | | $(0.54 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | (0.05 | ) | | — | | | (0.04 | ) | | (0.08 | ) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.55 | ) | | $(0.59 | ) | | $(0.54 | ) | | $(0.58 | ) | | $(0.62 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $5.37 | | | $4.43 | | | $6.92 | | | $7.68 | | | $7.42 | | | $7.65 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 28.20 | (n) | | (29.31 | ) | | (2.49 | ) | | 11.17 | | | 4.87 | | | 8.28 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.94 | (a) | | 1.89 | | | 1.84 | | | 1.92 | | | 1.94 | | | 1.94 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.65 | (a) | | 1.50 | | | 1.50 | | | 1.50 | | | 1.50 | | | 1.52 | |
Net investment income | | 9.88 | (a) | | 8.82 | | | 7.03 | | | 6.91 | | | 6.88 | | | 7.03 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 30 | | | 72 | | | 79 | | | 85 | | | 66 | | | 69 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $50,409 | | | $42,757 | | | $90,330 | | | $124,393 | | | $125,667 | | | $151,711 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class C | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $4.41 | | | $6.89 | | | $7.64 | | | $7.38 | | | $7.61 | | | $7.63 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.23 | | | $0.53 | | | $0.53 | | | $0.51 | | | $0.51 | | | $0.52 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.96 | | | (2.46 | ) | | (0.69 | ) | | 0.28 | | | (0.16 | ) | | 0.08 | |
Total from investment operations | | $1.19 | | | $(1.93 | ) | | $(0.16 | ) | | $0.79 | | | $0.35 | | | $0.60 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.55 | ) | | $(0.54 | ) | | $(0.53 | ) | | $(0.54 | ) | | $(0.54 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | (0.05 | ) | | — | | | (0.04 | ) | | (0.08 | ) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.55 | ) | | $(0.59 | ) | | $(0.53 | ) | | $(0.58 | ) | | $(0.62 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $5.34 | | | $4.41 | | | $6.89 | | | $7.64 | | | $7.38 | | | $7.61 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | | 28.06 | (n) | | (29.32 | ) | | (2.40 | ) | | 11.19 | | | 4.86 | | | 8.28 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.94 | (a) | | 1.90 | | | 1.84 | | | 1.92 | | | 1.94 | | | 1.94 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.65 | (a) | | 1.50 | | | 1.50 | | | 1.50 | | | 1.50 | | | 1.52 | |
Net investment income | | 9.88 | (a) | | 8.94 | | | 7.05 | | | 6.90 | | | 6.88 | | | 7.01 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 30 | | | 72 | | | 79 | | | 85 | | | 66 | | | 69 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $73,152 | | | $55,001 | | | $92,947 | | | $103,873 | | | $92,613 | | | $101,113 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class I | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $4.43 | | | $6.92 | | | $7.68 | | | $7.42 | | | $7.65 | | | $7.68 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.25 | | | $0.60 | | | $0.60 | | | $0.59 | | | $0.59 | | | $0.55 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.96 | | | (2.48 | ) | | (0.69 | ) | | 0.28 | | | (0.16 | ) | | 0.12 | |
Total from investment operations | | $1.21 | | | $(1.88 | ) | | $(0.09 | ) | | $0.87 | | | $0.43 | | | $0.67 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.61 | ) | | $(0.62 | ) | | $(0.61 | ) | | $(0.62 | ) | | $(0.62 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments | | — | | | (0.00 | )(w) | | (0.05 | ) | | — | | | (0.04 | ) | | (0.08 | ) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.61 | ) | | $(0.67 | ) | | $(0.61 | ) | | $(0.66 | ) | | $(0.70 | ) |
Redemption fees added to paid-in capital (d) | | $— | | | $— | | | $— | | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $5.36 | | | $4.43 | | | $6.92 | | | $7.68 | | | $7.42 | | | $7.65 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 28.57 | (n) | | (28.57 | ) | | (1.51 | ) | | 12.27 | | | 5.92 | | | 9.23 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 0.94 | (a) | | 0.89 | | | 0.84 | | | 0.92 | | | 0.94 | | | 0.93 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 0.65 | (a) | | 0.50 | | | 0.50 | | | 0.50 | | | 0.50 | | | 0.51 | |
Net investment income | | 10.80 | (a) | | 9.81 | | | 8.01 | | | 7.89 | | | 7.86 | | | 7.75 | |
Portfolio turnover | | 30 | | | 72 | | | 79 | | | 85 | | | 66 | | | 69 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $16,052 | | | $11,581 | | | $35,372 | | | $56,243 | | | $46,871 | | | $33,556 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | |
Class W | | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Year ended 1/31/09 (i) | |
| |
| | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $4.42 | | | $6.92 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.24 | | | $0.38 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.97 | | | (2.47 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | $1.21 | | | $(2.09 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.41 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $5.35 | | | $4.42 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 28.56 | (n) | | (30.82 | )(n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.03 | (a) | | 1.02 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 0.75 | (a) | | 0.59 | (a) |
Net investment income | | 10.50 | (a) | | 10.81 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | 30 | | | 72 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $267 | | | $129 | |
| | |
Class R1 | | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Year ended 1/31/09 (i) | |
| |
| | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $4.43 | | | $6.94 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.23 | | | $0.35 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.97 | | | (2.48 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | $1.20 | | | $(2.13 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.26 | ) | | $(0.38 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $5.37 | | | $4.43 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 28.20 | (n) | | (31.30 | )(n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.94 | (a) | | 1.92 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.65 | (a) | | 1.50 | (a) |
Net investment income | | 9.83 | (a) | | 9.60 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | 30 | | | 72 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $90 | | | $71 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | |
Class R2 | | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Year ended 1/31/09 (i) | |
| |
| | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $4.43 | | | $6.94 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.24 | | | $0.37 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.97 | | | (2.48 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | $1.21 | | | $(2.11 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.27 | ) | | $(0.40 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $5.37 | | | $4.43 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 28.50 | (n) | | (31.05 | )(n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.44 | (a) | | 1.42 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 1.15 | (a) | | 1.00 | (a) |
Net investment income | | 10.33 | (a) | | 10.11 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | 30 | | | 72 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $94 | | | $69 | |
| | |
Class R3 | | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Year ended 1/31/09 (i) | |
| |
| | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $4.42 | | | $6.92 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.24 | | | $0.34 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.97 | | | (2.43 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | $1.21 | | | $(2.09 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.41 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $5.35 | | | $4.42 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 28.46 | (n) | | (30.90 | )(n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 1.19 | (a) | | 1.17 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 0.90 | (a) | | 0.74 | (a) |
Net investment income | | 10.57 | (a) | | 10.25 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | 30 | | | 72 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $841 | | | $587 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 (unaudited) | | | Year ended 1/31/09 (i) | |
Class R4 | | |
| | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $4.42 | | | $6.92 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | $0.25 | | | $0.39 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | 0.96 | | | (2.47 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | $1.21 | | | $(2.08 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $(0.28 | ) | | $(0.42 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $5.35 | | | $4.42 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s) | | 28.62 | (n) | | (30.77 | )(n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | 0.94 | (a) | | 0.92 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | 0.65 | (a) | | 0.50 | (a) |
Net investment income | | 10.88 | (a) | | 10.64 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | 30 | | | 72 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | | $89 | | | $69 | |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(i) | For the period from the class’ inception, June 2, 2008 (Classes W, R1, R2, R3, and R4) through the stated period end. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(w) | Per share amount was less than $0.01. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) | | Business and Organization |
MFS High Yield Opportunities Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust III (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) | | Significant Accounting Policies |
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In making these estimates and assumptions, management has considered the effects, if any, of events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through September 16, 2009 which is the date that the financial statements were issued. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The fund can invest up to 100% of its portfolio in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions. The fund can invest in foreign securities, including securities of emerging market issuers. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment. The markets of emerging markets countries are generally more volatile than the markets of developed countries with more mature economies. All of the risks of investing in foreign securities previously described are heightened when investing in emerging markets countries.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Equity securities, including restricted equity securities, are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which they are primarily traded. For securities for which there were no sales reported that day, equity securities are generally valued at the last quoted daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which such securities are primarily traded. For securities held short for which there were no sales reported for that day, the position is generally valued at the last quoted daily ask quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or
32
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
exchange on which such securities are primarily traded. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures contracts are primarily traded. Forward foreign currency contracts are generally valued at the mean of bid and asked prices for the time period interpolated from rates provided by a third-party pricing service for proximate time periods. Swaps are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. Events that occur on a frequent basis after foreign markets close (such as developments in foreign markets and significant movements in the U.S. markets) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value may be deemed to have a material affect on the value of securities traded in foreign markets. Accordingly, the fund’s foreign equity securities may often be valued at fair value. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the
33
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities carried at market value. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures, forwards, swap contracts, and written options. The following is a summary of the levels used as of July 31, 2009 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities carried at market value:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Investments at Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | Total | |
Equity Securities | | $9,041,091 | | $515,265 | | | $114,611 | | $9,670,967 | |
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | | — | | 46,851,744 | | | — | | 46,851,744 | |
Corporate Bonds | | — | | 309,442,266 | | | — | | 309,442,266 | |
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | | — | | 49,820 | | | — | | 49,820 | |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | | — | | 18,963,130 | | | — | | 18,963,130 | |
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | | — | | 404,973 | | | — | | 404,973 | |
Foreign Bonds | | — | | 40,288,129 | | | — | | 40,288,129 | |
Floating Rate Loans | | — | | 28,338,869 | | | — | | 28,338,869 | |
Other Fixed Income Securities | | — | | 340,249 | | | — | | 340,249 | |
Mutual Funds | | 6,570,250 | | — | | | — | | 6,570,250 | |
Total Investments | | $15,611,341 | | $445,194,445 | | | $114,611 | | $460,920,397 | |
| | | | |
Other Financial Instruments | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | Total | |
Forward Currency Contracts | | $— | | $(75,900 | ) | | $— | | $(75,900 | ) |
34
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value. The table presents the activity of Level 3 securities held at the beginning and the end of the period.
| | | |
| | Equity Securities | |
Balance as of 1/31/09 | | $217,607 | |
Accrued discounts/premiums | | — | |
Realized gain (loss) | | — | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | (102,996 | ) |
Net purchases (sales) | | — | |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | | — | |
Balance as of 7/31/09 | | $114,611 | |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Derivatives – The fund may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the fund, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives may be used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
In this reporting period the fund adopted FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“FAS 161”), and FASB Staff Position FAS No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FAS 161 (“FSP FAS 133-1”).
FAS 161 amends FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities (“FAS 133”). FAS 161 provides enhanced disclosures about the fund’s use of and accounting for derivative instruments and the effect of
35
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
derivative instruments on the fund’s results of operations and financial position. Under FAS 161, tabular disclosure regarding derivative fair value and gain/loss by contract type (e.g., interest rate contracts, foreign exchange contracts, credit contracts, etc.) is required and derivatives accounted for as hedging instruments under FAS 133 must be disclosed separately from derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133. Because investment companies account for their derivatives at fair value and record any changes in fair value in current period earnings, the fund’s derivatives are not accounted for as hedging instruments under FAS 133. As such, even though the fund may use derivatives in an attempt to achieve an economic hedge, the fund’s derivatives are not considered to be hedging instruments under FAS 133.
FSP FAS 133-1 amends FAS 133 to require sellers of credit derivatives to make disclosures that will enable financial statement users to assess the potential effects of those credit derivatives on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. As defined by FSP FAS 133-1, a credit derivative is a derivative instrument (a) in which one or more of the derivative’s underlyings are related to the credit risk of a specified entity (or group of entities) or an index based on the credit risk of a group of entities and (b) that exposes the seller to potential loss from credit-risk-related events specified in the derivative contract. The seller (or writer) is the party that provides the credit protection and assumes the credit risk on a credit derivatives contract, such as a credit default swap. There was no impact from implementing FSP 133-1 as the fund did not hold any of these credit derivatives at period end.
As defined under FAS 133, derivative instruments include written options, purchased options, futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at July 31, 2009:
| | | | | | | |
| | | | Liability Derivatives | |
| | | | Location on Statement of Assets and Liabilities | | Fair Value | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts not Accounted for as Hedging Instruments Under FAS 133 | | Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | $(75,900 | ) |
36
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2009 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Foreign Currency Transactions | | Swap Transactions | | | Total | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | $109,393 | | $— | | | $109,393 | |
Credit Contracts | | — | | (6,287,180 | ) | | (6,287,180 | ) |
Total | | $109,393 | | $(6,287,180 | ) | | $(6,177,787 | ) |
The following table presents by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2009 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Translation of Assets and Liabilities in Foreign Currencies | | | Swap Transactions | | Total | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | $(603,112 | ) | | $— | | $(603,112 | ) |
Credit Contracts | | — | | | 5,277,344 | | 5,277,344 | |
Total | | $(603,112 | ) | | $5,277,344 | | $4,674,232 | |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported balance sheet assets and liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
37
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forwards, swaps and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Futures Contracts – The fund may use futures contracts to gain or to hedge against broad market, interest rate or currency exposure. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures is realized.
The fund bears the risk of interest rates, exchange rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The fund’s maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts – The fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date to hedge the fund’s currency risk or for non-hedging purposes. For hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts to deliver or receive foreign currency that the fund will receive from or use in its normal investment activities. The fund may also use contracts to hedge against declines in the value of foreign currency denominated securities due to unfavorable exchange rate movements. For
38
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
non-hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts with the intent of changing the relative exposure of the fund’s portfolio of securities to different currencies to take advantage of anticipated exchange rate changes.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a receivable or payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts until the contract settlement date. On contract settlement date, any gain or loss on the contract is recorded as realized gains or losses on foreign currency transactions.
Risks may arise upon entering into these contracts from unanticipated movements in the value of the contract and from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The fund’s maximum risk due to counterparty credit risk is the notional amount of the contract. This risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Swap Agreements – The fund may enter into swap agreements. A swap is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap are reflected as premiums paid or received on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap transactions are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. The risk is further mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
39
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The fund may enter into credit default swaps to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the contract notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although contract-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant contract. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference between the value of the deliverable obligation and the swap’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the contract. This risk is mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Hybrid Instruments – The fund may invest in indexed or hybrid securities on which any combination of interest payments, the principal or stated amount payable at maturity is determined by reference to prices of other securities, currencies, indices, economic factors or other measures, including interest rates, currency exchange rates, or securities indices. The risks of investing in hybrid instruments reflect a combination of the risks of investing in securities, swaps, options, futures and currencies. Hybrid instruments are potentially more volatile and carry greater market risks than traditional debt instruments. Depending on the structure of the particular hybrid instrument, changes in a benchmark, underlying assets or economic indicator may be magnified by the terms of the hybrid instrument and have an even more dramatic and
40
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
substantial effect upon the value of the hybrid instrument. Also, the prices of the hybrid instrument and the benchmark, underlying asset or economic indicator may not move in the same direction or at the same time.
Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments – The fund may invest in loans and loan participations or other receivables. These investments may include standby financing commitments, including revolving credit facilities, which obligate the fund to supply additional cash to the borrower on demand. At July 31, 2009, the portfolio had unfunded loan commitments of $98,617, which could be extended at the option of the borrower and which are covered by sufficient cash and/or liquid securities held by the fund. The market value and obligation of the fund on these unfunded loan commitments is included in Investments, at value and Payable for investments purchased, respectively, on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Loan participations involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other financial intermediary.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fund earns certain fees in connection with its floating rate loan purchasing activities. These fees are in addition to interest payments earned and may include amendment fees, commitment fees, facility fees, consent fees, and prepayment fees. Commitment fees are recorded on an accrual basis as income in the accompanying financial statements. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
41
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended July 31, 2009, is shown as a reduction of total expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Foreign taxes, if any, have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities, defaulted bonds, wash sale loss deferrals, foreign currency transactions and derivative transactions.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
| | |
| | 1/31/09 |
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | | $53,307,729 |
Long-term capital gain | | 431,261 |
Total distributions | | $53,738,990 |
42
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
| | | |
As of 7/31/09 | | | |
Cost of investments | | $551,586,541 | |
Gross appreciation | | 18,209,722 | |
Gross depreciation | | (108,875,866 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $(90,666,144 | ) |
| |
As of 1/31/09 | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | 2,193,777 | |
Capital loss carryforwards | | (51,185,843 | ) |
Post-October capital loss deferral | | (22,414,824 | ) |
Other temporary differences | | (6,159,382 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | (202,688,641 | ) |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments.
As of January 31, 2009, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution and service fees. The fund’s income, realized and unrealized gain (loss), and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B shares will convert to Class A shares approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | From net investment income | | From net realized gain on investments |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | Year ended 1/31/09 | | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | Year ended 1/31/09 |
Class A | | $17,007,312 | | $36,980,742 | | $— | | $305,040 |
Class B | | 2,461,578 | | 6,168,871 | | — | | 57,222 |
Class C | | 3,347,993 | | 7,067,401 | | — | | 61,125 |
Class I | | 843,705 | | 3,033,383 | | — | | 25,021 |
Class W | | 12,038 | | 9,608 | | — | | — |
Class R1 | | 4,176 | | 5,617 | | — | | — |
Class R2 | | 4,546 | | 5,910 | | — | | — |
Class R3 | | 40,274 | | 12,848 | | — | | — |
Class R4 | | 4,570 | | 6,202 | | — | | — |
Total | | $23,726,192 | | $53,290,582 | | $— | | $448,408 |
43
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(3) | | Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.65% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
As part of a settlement agreement with the New York Attorney General concerning market timing and related matters, MFS had agreed to reduce the management fee to 0.50% of the fund’s average daily net assets for the period March 1, 2004 through February 28, 2009. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, this waiver amounted to $43,325 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The management fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2009 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.63% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
The investment adviser had agreed in writing to pay all of the fund’s operating expenses, exclusive of management fee, distribution and service fees, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs and investment-related expenses. This written agreement terminated on May 31, 2009. Effective June 1, 2009, the investment advisor has agreed in writing to pay a portion of the fund’s total annual operating expenses, exclusive of interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs, and investment related expenses such that total annual fund operating expenses do not exceed the following rates annually of the fund’s average daily net assets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class W | | Class R1 | | Class R2 | | Class R3 | | Class R4 |
0.95% | | 1.70% | | 1.70% | | 0.70% | | 0.80% | | 1.70% | | 1.20% | | 0.95% | | 0.70% |
This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until May 31, 2010. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, these reductions amounted to $541,478 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $60,248 for the six months ended July 31, 2009, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the fund.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
44
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Distribution Fee Rate (d) | | Service Fee Rate (d) | | Total Distribution Plan (d) | | Annual Effective Rate (e) | | Distribution and Service Fee |
Class A | | — | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 0.26% | | $371,044 |
Class B | | 0.75% | | 0.25% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 215,369 |
Class C | | 0.75% | | 0.25% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 294,788 |
Class W | | 0.10% | | — | | 0.10% | | 0.10% | | 101 |
Class R1 | | 0.75% | | 0.25% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 367 |
Class R2 | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 0.50% | | 0.50% | | 192 |
Class R3 | | — | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 835 |
Total Distribution and Service Fees | | | | | | | | $882,696 |
(d) | As of July 31, 2009, in accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended July 31, 2009 based on each class’ average daily net assets. Prior to March 1, 2009, a 0.10% Class A annual distribution fee was paid by the fund. Effective March 1, 2009, the 0.10% Class A annual distribution fee was eliminated. |
Certain Class A shares purchased prior to September 1, 2008 are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Certain Class A shares purchased on or subsequent to September 1, 2008 are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 24 months of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended July 31, 2009, were as follows:
| | |
| | Amount |
Class A | | $1,000 |
Class B | | 31,245 |
Class C | | 2,516 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, the fee was $108,577, which equated to 0.0546% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $241,737.
45
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2009 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0212% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
For certain independent Trustees who served on the Board as of December 31, 2001, the fund has an unfunded retirement benefit deferral plan which resulted in an expense of $1,263. This amount is included in independent trustees’ compensation for the six months ended July 31, 2009. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent trustees amounted to $4,721 at July 31, 2009, and is included in payable for independent trustees’ compensation.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $2,124 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $1,675, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund may invest in a money market fund managed by MFS which seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in dividends from
46
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
underlying funds on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
Purchases and sales of investments, other than U.S. Government securities, purchased option transactions, and short-term obligations, aggregated $120,274,774 and $117,957,503, respectively.
(5) | | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | Year ended 1/31/09 (i) |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount |
Shares sold | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 14,460,468 | | $66,976,791 | | 26,116,292 | | $142,614,584 |
Class B | | 1,161,715 | | 5,510,451 | | 1,010,958 | | 5,647,139 |
Class C | | 2,113,330 | | 9,894,215 | | 2,471,442 | | 14,250,080 |
Class I | | 1,067,112 | | 4,697,248 | | 2,088,224 | | 12,607,140 |
Class W | | 27,492 | | 124,499 | | 27,960 | | 187,002 |
Class R1 | | 12 | | 335 | | 14,836 | | 101,904 |
Class R2 | | 981 | | 4,289 | | 14,409 | | 100,004 |
Class R3 | | 36,213 | | 162,678 | | 134,629 | | 617,424 |
Class R4 | | 3 | | 15 | | 14,451 | | 100,002 |
| | 18,867,326 | | $87,370,521 | | 31,893,201 | | $176,225,279 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | | | | | | |
Class A | | 2,535,941 | | $11,800,150 | | 4,720,541 | | $26,553,491 |
Class B | | 285,279 | | 1,328,818 | | 598,270 | | 3,403,783 |
Class C | | 383,867 | | 1,788,408 | | 645,582 | | 3,606,256 |
Class I | | 112,165 | | 524,522 | | 187,340 | | 1,050,059 |
Class W | | 1,193 | | 5,658 | | 1,201 | | 6,143 |
Class R1 | | 894 | | 4,176 | | 1,099 | | 5,617 |
Class R2 | | 972 | | 4,546 | | 1,154 | | 5,910 |
Class R3 | | 8,624 | | 40,274 | | 2,730 | | 12,848 |
Class R4 | | 981 | | 4,570 | | 1,211 | | 6,202 |
| �� | 3,329,916 | | $15,501,122 | | 6,159,128 | | $34,650,309 |
47
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/09 | | | Year ended 1/31/09 (i) | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares reacquired | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | (18,262,428 | ) | | $(83,678,421 | ) | | (34,648,534 | ) | | $(200,359,548 | ) |
Class B | | (1,699,076 | ) | | (7,743,065 | ) | | (5,013,327 | ) | | (29,351,496 | ) |
Class C | | (1,271,611 | ) | | (5,733,098 | ) | | (4,149,559 | ) | | (23,775,649 | ) |
Class I | | (801,140 | ) | | (3,712,298 | ) | | (4,770,200 | ) | | (23,294,045 | ) |
Class W | | (7,886 | ) | | (39,822 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Class R2 | | (3 | ) | | (14 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Class R3 | | (20,475 | ) | | (91,485 | ) | | (4,429 | ) | | (18,577 | ) |
| | (22,062,619 | ) | | $(100,998,203 | ) | | (48,586,049 | ) | | $(276,799,315 | ) |
Net change | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | (1,266,019 | ) | | $(4,901,480 | ) | | (3,811,701 | ) | | $(31,191,473 | ) |
Class B | | (252,082 | ) | | (903,796 | ) | | (3,404,099 | ) | | (20,300,574 | ) |
Class C | | 1,225,586 | | | 5,949,525 | | | (1,032,535 | ) | | (5,919,313 | ) |
Class I | | 378,137 | | | 1,509,472 | | | (2,494,636 | ) | | (9,636,846 | ) |
Class W | | 20,799 | | | 90,335 | | | 29,161 | | | 193,145 | |
Class R1 | | 906 | | | 4,511 | | | 15,935 | | | 107,521 | |
Class R2 | | 1,950 | | | 8,821 | | | 15,563 | | | 105,914 | |
Class R3 | | 24,362 | | | 111,467 | | | 132,930 | | | 611,695 | |
Class R4 | | 984 | | | 4,585 | | | 15,662 | | | 106,204 | |
| | 134,623 | | | $1,873,440 | | | (10,533,720 | ) | | $(65,923,727 | ) |
(i) | For the period from the class’ inception, June 2, 2008 (Classes W, R1, R2, R3, and R4) through the stated period end. |
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $2,431 and $0, respectively, and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations.
48
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(7) | | Transactions in Underlying Funds-Affiliated Issuers |
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
| | | | | | | | | |
Underlying Funds | | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | | | Ending Shares/Par Amount |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | 5,539,205 | | 90,709,359 | | (89,678,314 | ) | | 6,570,250 |
| | | | |
Underlying Funds | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | Capital Gain Distributions | | Dividend Income | | | Ending Value |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | $— | | $— | | $10,211 | | | $6,570,250 |
49
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2009 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2008 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and
50
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 5th quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 5th quintile for each of the one and five-year periods ended December 31, 2008 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
The Trustees expressed concern to MFS about the substandard investment performance of the Fund. In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took
51
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year, as to MFS’ efforts to improve the Fund’s performance, including the replacement of the senior portfolio manager in 2008. In addition, the Trustees requested that they receive a separate update on the Fund’s performance at each of their regular meetings. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that MFS’ responses and efforts and plans to improve investment performance were sufficient to support approval of the continuance of the investment advisory agreement for an additional one year period, but that they would continue to closely monitor the performance of the Fund.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS currently observes an expense limitation for the Fund. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each lower than the Lipper expense group median.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is not currently subject to any breakpoints. Taking into account the expense limitation noted above, the Trustees determined not to recommend any advisory fee breakpoints for the Fund at this time.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
52
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the entry into the industry of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Funds were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2009.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS will be available on or about November 1, 2009 by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
53
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and copies of this information may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
A shareholder can also obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com.
FURTHER INFORMATION
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
54
CONTACT US
Web site
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
Account service and literature
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Investment professionals
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
Mailing address
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
Overnight mail
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Save paper with eDelivery. MFS® will send you prospectuses, reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter. To sign up: 1. go to mfs.com. 2. log in via MFS® Access. 3. select eDelivery. If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS Access, and eDelivery may not be available to you.
The Registrant has not amended any provision in its Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that relates to any element of the Code’s definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 2 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
A schedule of investments for each series of the Registrant is included as part of the report to shareholders of such series under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may send recommendations to the Board for nominees to the Registrant’s Board since the Registrant last provided disclosure as to such procedures in response to the requirements of Item 407 (c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K or this Item.
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
(a) | Based upon their evaluation of the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR, the registrant’s principal financial officer and principal executive officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by the report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
(a) | File the exhibits listed below as part of this form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated. |
| (1) | Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit. |
| (2) | A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2 under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2): Attached hereto. |
(b) | If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)), Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: Attached hereto. |
Notice
A copy of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, as amended, of the Registrant is on file with the Secretary of State of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and notice is hereby given that this instrument is executed on behalf of the Registrant by an officer of the Registrant as an officer and not individually and the obligations of or arising out of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees or shareholders individually, but are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective constituent series of the Registrant.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) MFS SERIES TRUST III
| | |
By (Signature and Title)* | | MARIA F. DWYER |
| | Maria F. Dwyer, President |
Date: September 16, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
By (Signature and Title)* | | MARIA F. DWYER |
| | Maria F. Dwyer, President (Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: September 16, 2009
| | |
By (Signature and Title)* | | JOHN M. CORCORAN |
| | John M. Corcoran, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) |
Date: September 16, 2009
* | Print name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature. |