UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-2794
MFS SERIES TRUST III
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Susan S. Newton
Massachusetts Financial Services Company
111 Huntington Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02199
(Name and address of agents for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 954-5000
Date of fiscal year end: January 31
Date of reporting period: July 31, 2013
ITEM 1. | REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS. |
SEMIANNUAL REPORT
July 31, 2013
MFS® HIGH INCOME FUND
MFH-SEM
MFS® HIGH INCOME FUND
CONTENTS
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders.
It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholders:
The U.S. economy continues to grow, albeit at a modest pace, possibly helping to gently lift other regions out of a prolonged slump. The resilience of the U.S. housing
market and improved jobs picture continues to offset the drag created by the government’s sequestration and rise in taxes. Going forward, much could hinge on how much cooperation and bipartisanship the U.S. Congress can achieve, as yet another fiscal showdown looms later in 2013.
China is shifting gears from being the engine of global growth because of its rapid consumption of commodities. Commodity-exporting countries are feeling the squeeze from China’s economic focus being turned toward domestic consumers and its overall pace of growth slowing. Japan’s recent economic reports indicate that its 15-year period of stagnant
growth and deflation could be ending, while the eurozone is showing signs of a pickup in economic growth after two years of recession. These recent positive signs in Japan and Europe point to a possible broadening base of global growth that could help take the burden off China and the United States as the main engines of global activity.
As always, managing risk in the face of uncertainty remains a top priority for investors. At MFS®, our uniquely collaborative investment process employs integrated, global research and active risk management. Our global team of investment professionals shares ideas and evaluates opportunities across continents, investment disciplines and asset classes — all with a goal of building better insights, and ultimately better results, for our clients.
We are mindful of the many economic challenges investors face, and believe it is more important than ever to maintain a long-term view and employ time-tested principles, such as asset allocation and diversification. We remain confident that our unique approach can serve investors well as they work with their financial advisors to identify and pursue the most suitable opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
September 16, 2013
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio structure (i)
| | | | |
Top five industries (i) | | | | |
Energy-Independent | | | 8.1% | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services | | | 5.4% | |
Broadcasting | | | 5.1% | |
Telecommunications-Wireless | | | 4.0% | |
Utilities-Electric Power | | | 3.9% | |
| | | | |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | | | | |
A (o) | | | 0.0% | |
BBB | | | 3.4% | |
BB | | | 37.2% | |
B | | | 43.6% | |
CCC | | | 13.2% | |
C (o) | | | 0.0% | |
D (o) | | | 0.0% | |
Not Rated | | | 1.6% | |
Non-Fixed Income | | | 1.7% | |
Cash & Other | | | (0.7)% | |
| |
Portfolio facts (i) | | | | |
Average Duration (d) | | | 4.2 | |
Average Effective Maturity (m) | | | 6.8 yrs. | |
(a) | For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Non-Fixed Income includes equity securities (including convertible bonds and equity derivatives) and commodities. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
2
Portfolio Composition – continued
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
From time to time “Cash & Other Net Assets” may be negative due to timing of cash receipts and/or equivalent exposure from any derivative holdings.
Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio.
Percentages are based on net assets as of 7/31/13.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
EXPENSE TABLE
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
February 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period February 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013.
The expenses include the payment of a portion of the transfer-agent-related expenses of MFS funds that invest in the fund. For further information, please see the Notes to the Financial Statements.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
4
Expense Table – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | | | Beginning Account Value 2/01/13 | | | Ending Account Value 7/31/13 | | | Expenses
Paid During Period (p) 2/01/13-7/31/13 | |
A | | Actual | | | 0.91% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.91 | | | | $4.55 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.91% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.28 | | | | $4.56 | |
B | | Actual | | | 1.67% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,012.11 | | | | $8.33 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.67% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.51 | | | | $8.35 | |
C | | Actual | | | 1.67% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,012.15 | | | | $8.33 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.67% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.51 | | | | $8.35 | |
I | | Actual | | | 0.67% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.12 | | | | $3.35 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.67% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.47 | | | | $3.36 | |
R1 | | Actual | | | 1.67% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,012.11 | | | | $8.33 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.67% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.51 | | | | $8.35 | |
R2 | | Actual | | | 1.17% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,014.67 | | | | $5.84 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.17% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.99 | | | | $5.86 | |
R3 | | Actual | | | 0.92% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.89 | | | | $4.60 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.92% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.23 | | | | $4.61 | |
R4 | | Actual | | | 0.67% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.20 | | | | $3.35 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.67% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.47 | | | | $3.36 | |
R5 | | Actual | | | 0.60% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.52 | | | | $3.00 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.60% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.82 | | | | $3.01 | |
529A | | Actual | | | 0.95% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.66 | | | | $4.75 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.95% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.08 | | | | $4.76 | |
529B | | Actual | | | 1.72% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,011.86 | | | | $8.58 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.72% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.27 | | | | $8.60 | |
529C | | Actual | | | 1.72% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,011.86 | | | | $8.58 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.72% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.27 | | | | $8.60 | |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid are equal to each class’s annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
Expense Changes Impacting the Table
Expense ratios for Class A and Class 529A include 12b-1 Service Fee rebate of 0.01% and 0.02%, respectively (See Note 3 of the Notes to Financial Statements for additional information).
5
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
7/31/13 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
| | | | | | | | |
Bonds - 93.7% | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Aerospace - 2.3% | | | | | | | | |
Bombardier, Inc., 4.25%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 715,000 | | | $ | 741,813 | |
Bombardier, Inc., 7.5%, 2018 (n) | | | 5,875,000 | | | | 6,638,710 | |
Bombardier, Inc., 7.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,770,000 | | | | 3,164,725 | |
CPI International, Inc., 8%, 2018 | | | 3,907,000 | | | | 4,014,443 | |
Heckler & Koch GmbH, 9.5%, 2018 (z) | | EUR | 1,753,000 | | | | 2,134,108 | |
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 7.125%, 2021 | | $ | 5,715,000 | | | | 6,286,500 | |
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., 10%, 2017 | | | 5,385,000 | | | | 5,815,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 28,796,099 | |
Apparel Manufacturers - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Hanesbrands, Inc., 6.375%, 2020 | | $ | 2,990,000 | | | $ | 3,277,787 | |
Jones Group, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 | | | 2,720,000 | | | | 2,808,400 | |
PVH Corp., 7.375%, 2020 | | | 3,895,000 | | | | 4,269,894 | |
PVH Corp., 4.5%, 2022 | | | 2,120,000 | | | | 2,072,300 | |
Quiksilver, Inc., 10%, 2020 (z) | | | 275,000 | | | | 283,938 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,712,319 | |
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.696%, 2049 | | $ | 2,948,120 | | | $ | 412,737 | |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “E2”, 6%, 2045 (z) | | | 1,307,341 | | | | 13,073 | |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “F”, FRN, 1.564%, 2050 (p)(z) | | | 649,416 | | | | 1,624 | |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “G”, FRN, 1.764%, 2050 (z) | | | 2,027,418 | | | | 5,069 | |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 11.364%, 2025 (i)(z) | | | 1,184,019 | | | | 177,603 | |
First Union National Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, 6.75%, 2032 | | | 1,456,848 | | | | 727,747 | |
G-Force LLC, CDO, “A2”, 4.83%, 2036 (z) | | | 608,107 | | | | 609,627 | |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “C”, FRN, 6%, 2051 | | | 2,285,000 | | | | 534,233 | |
LB Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.042%, 2030 (i) | | | 3,625,907 | | | | 70,241 | |
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.385%, 2039 (i)(z) | | | 6,255,923 | | | | 132,938 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,684,892 | |
Automotive - 3.6% | | | | | | | | |
Accuride Corp., 9.5%, 2018 | | $ | 5,135,000 | | | $ | 5,321,144 | |
Allison Transmission, Inc., 7.125%, 2019 (n) | | | 6,085,000 | | | | 6,495,738 | |
Continental Rubber of America Corp., 4.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 815,000 | | | | 828,646 | |
Delphi Corp., 5%, 2023 | | | 3,015,000 | | | | 3,135,600 | |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 12%, 2015 | | | 430,000 | | | | 505,964 | |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 8.125%, 2020 | | | 1,320,000 | | | | 1,622,941 | |
6
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Automotive - continued | | | | | | | | |
General Motors Financial Co., Inc., 4.75%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 1,815,000 | | | $ | 1,903,481 | |
General Motors Financial Co., Inc., 6.75%, 2018 | | | 3,270,000 | | | | 3,646,050 | |
General Motors Financial Co., Inc., 4.25%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,305,000 | | | | 1,252,800 | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 770,000 | | | | 858,550 | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 4,505,000 | | | | 4,713,356 | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 7%, 2022 | | | 1,340,000 | | | | 1,423,750 | |
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 7.75%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,385,000 | | | | 1,509,650 | |
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 8.125%, 2021 (n) | | | 7,060,000 | | | | 7,818,950 | |
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 5.625%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,055,000 | | | | 1,033,900 | |
Lear Corp., 8.125%, 2020 | | | 1,543,000 | | | | 1,701,158 | |
Lear Corp., 4.75%, 2023 (n) | | | 885,000 | | | | 867,300 | |
LKQ Corp., 4.75%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,510,000 | | | | 1,447,713 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 46,086,691 | |
Broadcasting - 5.0% | | | | | | | | |
Allbritton Communications Co., 8%, 2018 | | $ | 1,575,000 | | | $ | 1,702,969 | |
AMC Networks, Inc., 7.75%, 2021 | | | 4,606,000 | | | | 5,158,720 | |
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., 9%, 2021 | | | 3,497,000 | | | | 3,444,545 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., 6.5%, 2022 | | | 830,000 | | | | 859,050 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., 6.5%, 2022 | | | 3,080,000 | | | | 3,218,600 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., “A”, 7.625%, 2020 | | | 170,000 | | | | 177,650 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., “B”, 7.625%, 2020 | | | 1,570,000 | | | | 1,656,350 | |
Hughes Network Systems LLC, 7.625%, 2021 | | | 1,920,000 | | | | 2,078,400 | |
IAC/InterActive Corp., 4.75%, 2022 | | | 985,000 | | | | 930,825 | |
Inmarsat Finance PLC, 7.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,735,000 | | | | 2,878,588 | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A., 6.625%, 2022 (n) | | | 3,215,000 | | | | 3,287,338 | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A., 6.625%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,345,000 | | | | 1,375,263 | |
Intelsat S.A., 8.125%, 2023 (n) | | | 3,890,000 | | | | 4,181,750 | |
LBI Media, Inc., 13.5% to 2015, 11.5% to 2020 (p)(z) | | | 952,947 | | | | 333,531 | |
Liberty Media Corp., 8.5%, 2029 | | | 4,285,000 | | | | 4,718,856 | |
Liberty Media Corp., 8.25%, 2030 | | | 40,000 | | | | 43,250 | |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 (p)(z) | | | 3,186,123 | | | | 3,233,915 | |
Netflix, Inc., 5.375%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,765,000 | | | | 2,792,650 | |
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., 8.875%, 2017 | | | 1,340,000 | | | | 1,450,550 | |
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., 6.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,195,000 | | | | 1,236,825 | |
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., 9.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,540,000 | | | | 1,632,400 | |
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., 8.375%, 2018 | | | 430,000 | | | | 465,475 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 8.75%, 2015 (n) | | | 2,805,000 | | | | 3,162,638 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 7.625%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,705,000 | | | | 2,982,262 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 4.25%, 2020 (n) | | | 785,000 | | | | 730,050 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 5.25%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,515,000 | | | | 1,465,763 | |
Univision Communications, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,455,000 | | | | 3,688,212 | |
Univision Communications, Inc., 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,280,000 | | | | 2,502,300 | |
7
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Broadcasting - continued | | | | | | | | |
Univision Communications, Inc., 8.5%, 2021 (n) | | $ | 2,090,000 | | | $ | 2,299,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 63,687,725 | |
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
E*TRADE Financial Corp., 6.375%, 2019 | | $ | 6,570,000 | | | $ | 6,980,625 | |
| | |
Building - 2.6% | | | | | | | | |
ABC Supply Co., Inc., 5.625%, 2021 (n) | | $ | 695,000 | | | $ | 693,263 | |
Boise Cascade Co., 6.375%, 2020 | | | 2,280,000 | | | | 2,356,950 | |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 6.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,125,000 | | | | 2,263,125 | |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 7%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,150,000 | | | | 1,230,500 | |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 6.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 3,235,000 | | | | 3,461,450 | |
CEMEX Espana S.A., 9.25%, 2020 | | | 1,735,000 | | | | 1,895,488 | |
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 5.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 669,000 | | | | 669,000 | |
Gibraltar Industries, Inc., 6.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,010,000 | | | | 1,035,250 | |
HD Supply, Inc., 8.125%, 2019 | | | 1,545,000 | | | | 1,730,400 | |
HD Supply, Inc., 11.5%, 2020 | | | 2,865,000 | | | | 3,398,606 | |
Nortek, Inc., 8.5%, 2021 | | | 5,540,000 | | | | 5,997,050 | |
Roofing Supply Group LLC/Roofing Supply Finance, Inc., 10%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,335,000 | | | | 2,568,500 | |
USG Corp., 6.3%, 2016 | | | 4,585,000 | | | | 4,745,475 | |
USG Corp., 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,570,000 | | | | 1,738,775 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 33,783,832 | |
Business Services - 1.6% | | | | | | | | |
Equinix, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | | $ | 2,550,000 | | | $ | 2,524,500 | |
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., 5%, 2022 | | | 3,080,000 | | | | 3,149,300 | |
iGATE Corp., 9%, 2016 | | | 4,863,000 | | | | 5,245,961 | |
Iron Mountain, Inc., 8.375%, 2021 | | | 4,660,000 | | | | 5,050,275 | |
Legend Acquisition Sub, Inc., 10.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,690,000 | | | | 1,385,800 | |
Neustar, Inc., 4.5%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,910,000 | | | | 1,785,850 | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., 7.375%, 2018 | | | 1,255,000 | | | | 1,330,300 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 20,471,986 | |
Cable TV - 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 8.125%, 2020 | | $ | 5,565,000 | | | $ | 6,051,938 | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 7.375%, 2020 | | | 1,305,000 | | | | 1,406,138 | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 6.5%, 2021 | | | 2,840,000 | | | | 2,918,100 | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 5.125%, 2023 | | | 1,195,000 | | | | 1,093,425 | |
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Capital Corp., 5.75%, 2024 | | | 1,625,000 | | | | 1,519,375 | |
Cequel Communications Holdings, 6.375%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,310,000 | | | | 2,385,075 | |
DISH DBS Corp., 6.75%, 2021 | | | 3,410,000 | | | | 3,614,600 | |
DISH DBS Corp., 5%, 2023 | | | 1,240,000 | | | | 1,162,500 | |
EchoStar Corp., 7.125%, 2016 | | | 2,585,000 | | | | 2,830,575 | |
8
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Cable TV - continued | | | | | | | | |
Lynx I Corp., 5.375%, 2021 (n) | | $ | 1,575,000 | | | $ | 1,594,688 | |
Lynx II Corp., 6.375%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,065,000 | | | | 1,092,956 | |
Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, 6.25%, 2021 (z) | | | 280,000 | | | | 281,400 | |
Nara Cable Funding Ltd., 8.875%, 2018 (z) | | | 985,000 | | | | 1,034,250 | |
Telenet Finance Luxembourg, 6.375%, 2020 (n) | | EUR | 1,875,000 | | | | 2,624,115 | |
Unitymedia Hessen, 5.5%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 365,000 | | | | 354,963 | |
UPC Holding B.V., 9.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,910,000 | | | | 3,171,900 | |
UPCB Finance III Ltd., 6.625%, 2020 (n) | | | 5,403,000 | | | | 5,781,210 | |
Virgin Media Finance PLC, 8.375%, 2019 | | | 865,000 | | | | 940,687 | |
Ziggo Bond Co. B.V., 8%, 2018 (n) | | EUR | 2,225,000 | | | | 3,167,231 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 43,025,126 | |
Chemicals - 2.2% | | | | | | | | |
Celanese U.S. Holdings LLC, 6.625%, 2018 | | $ | 3,265,000 | | | $ | 3,485,388 | |
Flash Dutch 2 B.V./U.S. Coatings Acquisition, 7.375%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,295,000 | | | | 1,341,944 | |
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp., 6.625%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,400,000 | | | | 1,431,500 | |
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, 8.875%, 2018 | | | 2,205,000 | | | | 2,293,200 | |
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, 9%, 2020 | | | 1,850,000 | | | | 1,873,125 | |
Huntsman International LLC, 8.625%, 2021 | | | 5,025,000 | | | | 5,665,688 | |
INEOS Finance PLC, 8.375%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,075,000 | | | | 3,374,813 | |
INEOS Group Holdings S.A., 6.125%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,415,000 | | | | 2,354,625 | |
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., 5%, 2019 | | | 1,450,000 | | | | 1,605,408 | |
NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5.25%, 2023 (z) | | | 1,640,000 | | | | 1,640,000 | |
Polypore International, Inc., 7.5%, 2017 | | | 1,560,000 | | | | 1,645,800 | |
Tronox Finance LLC, 6.375%, 2020 (z) | | | 1,685,000 | | | | 1,613,388 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 28,324,879 | |
Computer Software - 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Infor U.S., Inc., 11.5%, 2018 | | $ | 2,545,000 | | | $ | 2,933,113 | |
Nuance Communications, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,190,000 | | | | 1,160,250 | |
Syniverse Holdings, Inc., 9.125%, 2019 | | | 5,140,000 | | | | 5,551,200 | |
TransUnion Holding Co., Inc., 9.625%, 2018 | | | 1,325,000 | | | | 1,437,625 | |
TransUnion LLC/TransUnion Financing Corp., 11.375%, 2018 | | | 635,000 | | | | 713,581 | |
Verisign, Inc., 4.625%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,215,000 | | | | 2,126,400 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 13,922,169 | |
Computer Software - Systems - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Audatex North America, Inc., 6.75%, 2018 | | $ | 2,705,000 | | | $ | 2,887,588 | |
Audatex North America, Inc., 6%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,590,000 | | | | 1,617,825 | |
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 12.535%, 2017 | | | 852,000 | | | | 898,860 | |
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 8.5%, 2019 | | | 3,795,000 | | | | 4,165,013 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 9,569,286 | |
9
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Conglomerates - 2.0% | | | | | | | | |
Amsted Industries, Inc., 8.125%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 5,470,000 | | | $ | 5,811,875 | |
BC Mountain LLC, 7%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,915,000 | | | | 1,991,600 | |
Dynacast International LLC, 9.25%, 2019 | | | 2,295,000 | | | | 2,513,025 | |
Griffon Corp., 7.125%, 2018 | | | 4,075,000 | | | | 4,288,938 | |
Renaissance Acquisition, 6.875%, 2021 (z) | | | 3,400,000 | | | | 3,383,000 | |
Rexel S.A., 6.125%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,040,000 | | | | 2,116,500 | |
Rexel S.A., 5.25%, 2020 (n) | | | 835,000 | | | | 830,825 | |
Silver II Borrower, 7.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,785,000 | | | | 3,964,788 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 24,900,551 | |
Construction - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Empresas ICA Sociedad Controladora S.A. de C.V., 8.9%, 2021 | | $ | 810,000 | | | $ | 753,300 | |
| | |
Consumer Products - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Elizabeth Arden, Inc., 7.375%, 2021 | | $ | 3,216,000 | | | $ | 3,473,280 | |
Jarden Corp., 7.5%, 2020 | | | 3,195,000 | | | | 3,430,631 | |
Libbey Glass, Inc., 6.875%, 2020 | | | 932,000 | | | | 997,240 | |
Prestige Brands, Inc., 8.125%, 2020 | | | 1,531,000 | | | | 1,687,928 | |
Spectrum Brands Escrow Corp., 6.375%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,335,000 | | | | 2,480,938 | |
Spectrum Brands Escrow Corp., 6.625%, 2022 (n) | | | 260,000 | | | | 278,200 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,348,217 | |
Consumer Services - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
QVC, Inc., 7.375%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 1,995,000 | | | $ | 2,178,207 | |
Service Corp. International, 7%, 2017 | | | 5,080,000 | | | | 5,626,100 | |
Service Corp. International, 7%, 2019 | | | 115,000 | | | | 123,769 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,928,076 | |
Containers - 3.1% | | | | | | | | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 7%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 2,210,000 | | | $ | 2,176,850 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 7.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,530,000 | | | | 2,691,288 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 9.125%, 2020 (n) | | | 4,110,000 | | | | 4,438,800 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 9.125%, 2020 (n) | | | 400,000 | | | | 434,000 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 4.875%, 2022 (z) | | | 1,350,000 | | | | 1,312,875 | |
Ball Corp., 5%, 2022 | | | 1,624,000 | | | | 1,628,060 | |
Ball Corp., 4%, 2023 | | | 1,245,000 | | | | 1,139,175 | |
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., 9.5%, 2018 | | | 1,190,000 | | | | 1,291,150 | |
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., 9.75%, 2021 | | | 2,645,000 | | | | 3,094,650 | |
Crown Americas LLC, 4.5%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,030,000 | | | | 1,892,975 | |
Greif, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | | | 3,415,000 | | | | 3,773,575 | |
Greif, Inc., 7.75%, 2019 | | | 795,000 | | | | 906,300 | |
Reynolds Group, 7.125%, 2019 | | | 2,925,000 | | | | 3,122,438 | |
Reynolds Group, 9.875%, 2019 | | | 1,030,000 | | | | 1,112,400 | |
Reynolds Group, 5.75%, 2020 | | | 2,760,000 | | | | 2,808,300 | |
10
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Containers - continued | | | | | | | | |
Reynolds Group, 8.25%, 2021 | | $ | 7,195,000 | | | $ | 7,320,913 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 39,143,749 | |
Defense Electronics - 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Ducommun, Inc., 9.75%, 2018 | | $ | 3,256,000 | | | $ | 3,614,160 | |
MOOG, Inc., 7.25%, 2018 | | | 2,560,000 | | | | 2,649,600 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,263,760 | |
Electrical Equipment - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Avaya, Inc., 9.75%, 2015 | | $ | 1,255,000 | | | $ | 1,229,900 | |
Avaya, Inc., 7%, 2019 (n) | | | 805,000 | | | | 742,613 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,972,513 | |
Electronics - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 9.25%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 4,260,000 | | | $ | 4,616,775 | |
Nokia Corp., 5.375%, 2019 | | | 1,075,000 | | | | 1,048,125 | |
Nokia Corp., 6.625%, 2039 | | | 1,345,000 | | | | 1,183,600 | |
NXP B.V., 9.75%, 2018 (n) | | | 100,000 | | | | 111,500 | |
NXP B.V., 5.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 870,000 | | | | 893,925 | |
NXP B.V., 5.75%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,830,000 | | | | 2,858,300 | |
Sensata Technologies B.V., 6.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,770,000 | | | | 4,033,900 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 14,746,125 | |
Energy - Independent - 7.8% | | | | | | | | |
Berry Petroleum Corp., 6.75%, 2020 | | $ | 770,000 | | | $ | 796,950 | |
BreitBurn Energy Partners LP, 8.625%, 2020 | | | 1,395,000 | | | | 1,485,675 | |
BreitBurn Energy Partners LP, 7.875%, 2022 | | | 3,450,000 | | | | 3,475,875 | |
Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc., 8.625%, 2018 | | | 995,000 | | | | 1,087,038 | |
Chaparral Energy, Inc., 7.625%, 2022 | | | 2,445,000 | | | | 2,500,013 | |
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 6.875%, 2020 | | | 3,685,000 | | | | 4,035,075 | |
Concho Resources, Inc., 6.5%, 2022 | | | 4,690,000 | | | | 5,018,300 | |
Concho Resources, Inc., 5.5%, 2023 | | | 2,285,000 | | | | 2,279,288 | |
Continental Resources, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | | | 3,180,000 | | | | 3,482,100 | |
Continental Resources, Inc., 7.375%, 2020 | | | 1,220,000 | | | | 1,354,200 | |
Continental Resources, Inc., 4.5%, 2023 | | | 1,506,000 | | | | 1,464,585 | |
Denbury Resources, Inc., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 4,860,000 | | | | 5,346,000 | |
Denbury Resources, Inc., 4.625%, 2023 | | | 1,245,000 | | | | 1,139,175 | |
Energy XXI Gulf Coast, Inc., 9.25%, 2017 | | | 4,980,000 | | | | 5,527,800 | |
EP Energy LLC, 9.375%, 2020 | | | 5,265,000 | | | | 5,975,775 | |
EP Energy LLC, 7.75%, 2022 | | | 4,030,000 | | | | 4,433,000 | |
EPL Oil & Gas, Inc., 8.25%, 2018 | | | 2,495,000 | | | | 2,632,225 | |
Halcon Resources Corp., 8.875%, 2021 | | | 3,130,000 | | | | 3,161,300 | |
Harvest Operations Corp., 6.875%, 2017 | | | 4,585,000 | | | | 5,054,963 | |
Hilcorp Energy I/Hilcorp Finance Co., 8%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,870,000 | | | | 2,026,613 | |
11
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Energy - Independent - continued | | | | | | | | |
Laredo Petroleum, Inc., 9.5%, 2019 | | $ | 1,955,000 | | | $ | 2,170,050 | |
LINN Energy LLC, 8.625%, 2020 | | | 2,050,000 | | | | 2,132,000 | |
LINN Energy LLC, 7.75%, 2021 | | | 2,621,000 | | | | 2,647,210 | |
MEG Energy Corp., 6.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,840,000 | | | | 1,876,800 | |
QEP Resources, Inc., 6.875%, 2021 | | | 4,980,000 | | | | 5,552,700 | |
Range Resources Corp., 8%, 2019 | | | 2,910,000 | | | | 3,142,800 | |
Range Resources Corp., 5%, 2022 | | | 3,055,000 | | | | 3,085,550 | |
Rosetta Resources, Inc., 5.625%, 2021 | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 1,335,000 | |
Samson Investment Co., 10%, 2020 (n) | | | 4,015,000 | | | | 4,255,900 | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., 8.125%, 2022 | | | 3,610,000 | | | | 3,664,150 | |
SM Energy Co., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 3,765,000 | | | | 3,990,900 | |
Whiting Petroleum Corp., 6.5%, 2018 | | | 2,505,000 | | | | 2,655,300 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 98,784,310 | |
Engineering - Construction - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
BakerCorp International, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | | $ | 2,760,000 | | | $ | 2,780,700 | |
| | |
Entertainment - 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
AMC Entertainment, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 | | $ | 1,860,000 | | | $ | 2,013,450 | |
Cedar Fair LP, 9.125%, 2018 | | | 1,875,000 | | | | 2,067,188 | |
Cedar Fair LP, 5.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,525,000 | | | | 1,490,688 | |
Cinemark USA, Inc., 4.875%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,965,000 | | | | 1,856,925 | |
Cinemark USA, Inc., 5.125%, 2022 | | | 635,000 | | | | 611,981 | |
NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC, 8.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,031,000 | | | | 1,119,666 | |
NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC, 5%, 2018 (z) | | | 1,520,000 | | | | 1,540,900 | |
Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 5.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 3,380,000 | | | | 3,303,950 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 14,004,748 | |
Financial Institutions - 5.0% | | | | | | | | |
Aviation Capital Group, 4.625%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 2,300,000 | | | $ | 2,309,966 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5.25%, 2014 (n) | | | 1,680,000 | | | | 1,713,600 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5.25%, 2018 | | | 3,330,000 | | | | 3,538,125 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 6.625%, 2018 (n) | | | 5,369,000 | | | | 5,932,745 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,347,000 | | | | 3,510,166 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5%, 2022 | | | 3,260,000 | | | | 3,231,475 | |
Credit Acceptance Corp., 9.125%, 2017 | | | 2,555,000 | | | | 2,727,463 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 7.75%, 2016 | | | 770,000 | | | | 799,838 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 8%, 2018 | | | 4,406,000 | | | | 4,653,838 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 6%, 2020 (z) | | | 1,785,000 | | | | 1,785,000 | |
International Lease Finance Corp., 4.875%, 2015 | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 1,339,000 | |
International Lease Finance Corp., 8.625%, 2015 | | | 1,345,000 | | | | 1,489,588 | |
International Lease Finance Corp., 7.125%, 2018 (n) | | | 3,601,000 | | | | 4,060,128 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 10.875%, 2015 | | | 4,265,000 | | | | 4,483,581 | |
12
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Financial Institutions - continued | | | | | | | | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 6.5%, 2018 | | $ | 1,485,000 | | | $ | 1,499,850 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 9.625%, 2019 | | | 1,130,000 | | | | 1,271,250 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 7.875%, 2020 | | | 1,695,000 | | | | 1,817,888 | |
PHH Corp., 9.25%, 2016 | | | 2,190,000 | | | | 2,474,700 | |
PHH Corp., 7.375%, 2019 | | | 1,890,000 | | | | 2,071,913 | |
SLM Corp., 8.45%, 2018 | | | 2,865,000 | | | | 3,295,094 | |
SLM Corp., 8%, 2020 | | | 5,450,000 | | | | 6,076,750 | |
SLM Corp., 7.25%, 2022 | | | 3,355,000 | | | | 3,556,300 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 63,638,258 | |
Food & Beverages - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
ARAMARK Corp., 5.75%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 995,000 | | | $ | 1,034,800 | |
B&G Foods, Inc., 4.625%, 2021 | | | 1,575,000 | | | | 1,521,844 | |
Constellation Brands, Inc., 7.25%, 2016 | | | 1,410,000 | | | | 1,603,875 | |
Constellation Brands, Inc., 3.75%, 2021 | | | 525,000 | | | | 490,875 | |
Constellation Brands, Inc., 4.25%, 2023 | | | 1,045,000 | | | | 984,913 | |
Hawk Acquisition Sub, Inc., 4.25%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,610,000 | | | | 2,505,600 | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC, 4.875%, 2021 (z) | | | 620,000 | | | | 581,250 | |
Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,395,000 | | | | 1,398,488 | |
TreeHouse Foods, Inc., 7.75%, 2018 | | | 2,455,000 | | | | 2,614,575 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,736,220 | |
Forest & Paper Products - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Boise, Inc., 8%, 2020 | | $ | 2,770,000 | | | $ | 2,977,750 | |
Graphic Packaging Holding Co., 7.875%, 2018 | | | 1,840,000 | | | | 2,001,000 | |
Sappi Papier Holding GmbH, 7.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,525,000 | | | | 1,601,250 | |
Smurfit Kappa Group PLC, 4.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,825,000 | | | | 1,820,438 | |
Smurfit Kappa Group PLC, 7.75%, 2019 (n) | | EUR | 1,920,000 | | | | 2,789,469 | |
Tembec Industries, Inc., 11.25%, 2018 | | $ | 1,615,000 | | | | 1,752,275 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,942,182 | |
Gaming & Lodging - 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
Caesars Entertainment Operating Co., Inc., 8.5%, 2020 | | $ | 1,630,000 | | | $ | 1,517,938 | |
Chester Downs & Marina LLC, 9.25%, 2020 (z) | | | 1,750,000 | | | | 1,732,500 | |
Choice Hotels International, Inc., 5.75%, 2022 | | | 520,000 | | | | 546,000 | |
CityCenter Holdings LLC, 10.75%, 2017 (p) | | | 1,240,000 | | | | 1,339,200 | |
Fontainebleau Las Vegas Holdings LLC, 10.25%, 2015 (a)(d)(n) | | | 3,300,000 | | | | 2,063 | |
GWR Operating Partnership LLP, 10.875%, 2017 | | | 1,305,000 | | | | 1,459,969 | |
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., REIT, 5.25%, 2022 | | | 1,725,000 | | | | 1,796,838 | |
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., 8.875%, 2020 | | | 3,480,000 | | | | 3,654,000 | |
MGM Resorts International, 11.375%, 2018 | | | 3,485,000 | | | | 4,408,525 | |
MGM Resorts International, 6.625%, 2021 | | | 2,265,000 | | | | 2,389,575 | |
NCL Corp., 5%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,280,000 | | | | 1,276,800 | |
Peninsula Gaming LLC, 8.375%, 2018 (z) | | | 730,000 | | | | 790,225 | |
13
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Gaming & Lodging - continued | | | | | | | | |
Penn National Gaming, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 | | $ | 3,745,000 | | | $ | 4,110,138 | |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 8.75%, 2020 | | | 2,545,000 | | | | 2,754,963 | |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 7.75%, 2022 | | | 1,095,000 | | | | 1,147,013 | |
PNK Finance Corp., 6.375%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,090,000 | | | | 1,098,175 | |
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., REIT, 5%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,355,000 | | | | 1,327,900 | |
Seven Seas Cruises S. DE R.L., 9.125%, 2019 | | | 4,755,000 | | | | 5,123,513 | |
Viking Cruises Ltd., 8.5%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,985,000 | | | | 2,188,462 | |
Wynn Las Vegas LLC, 7.75%, 2020 | | | 3,830,000 | | | | 4,308,750 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 42,972,547 | |
Industrial - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Dematic S.A., 7.75%, 2020 (z) | | $ | 4,815,000 | | | $ | 5,067,788 | |
Hyva Global B.V., 8.625%, 2016 (n) | | | 1,989,000 | | | | 1,805,018 | |
Mueller Water Products, Inc., 8.75%, 2020 | | | 1,952,000 | | | | 2,139,880 | |
SPL Logistics Escrow LLC, 8.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,320,000 | | | | 3,452,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,465,486 | |
Insurance - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
MetLife, Inc., 9.25% to 2038, FRN to 2068 (n) | | $ | 1,300,000 | | | $ | 1,729,000 | |
| | |
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 10.75% to 2038, FRN to 2088 (n) | | $ | 3,430,000 | | | $ | 5,230,750 | |
XL Group PLC, FRN, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2049 | | | 5,275,000 | | | | 5,182,687 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,413,437 | |
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 2016 | | $ | 1,090,000 | | | $ | 1,128,150 | |
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 2017 | | | 1,805,000 | | | | 1,870,431 | |
Electricite de France, FRN, 5.25%, 2049 (n) | | | 331,000 | | | | 316,519 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,315,100 | |
Machinery & Tools - 2.2% | | | | | | | | |
Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 2017 | | $ | 5,625,000 | | | $ | 6,595,313 | |
CNH America LLC, 7.25%, 2016 | | | 2,140,000 | | | | 2,343,300 | |
CNH Capital LLC, 3.875%, 2015 | | | 650,000 | | | | 667,875 | |
CNH Capital LLC, 6.25%, 2016 | | | 785,000 | | | | 857,613 | |
CNH Capital LLC, 3.625%, 2018 | | | 2,610,000 | | | | 2,564,325 | |
H&E Equipment Services Co., 7%, 2022 | | | 3,185,000 | | | | 3,407,950 | |
NESCO LLC/NESCO Holdings Corp., 11.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 3,855,000 | | | | 4,298,325 | |
RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., 8.25%, 2021 | | | 2,910,000 | | | | 3,251,925 | |
United Rentals North America, Inc., 5.75%, 2018 | | | 1,420,000 | | | | 1,519,400 | |
United Rentals North America, Inc., 7.625%, 2022 | | | 2,412,000 | | | | 2,689,380 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 28,195,406 | |
14
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Major Banks - 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Bank of America Corp., FRN, 5.2%, 2049 | | $ | 3,800,000 | | | $ | 3,420,000 | |
Barclays Bank PLC, 7.625%, 2022 | | | 3,460,000 | | | | 3,442,700 | |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 7.648% to 2031, FRN to 2049 | | | 5,670,000 | | | | 5,386,500 | |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 6.99% to 2017, FRN to 2049 (n) | | | 1,370,000 | | | | 1,328,900 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 13,578,100 | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 5.3% | | | | | | | | |
AmSurg Corp., 5.625%, 2020 | | $ | 2,865,000 | | | $ | 2,922,300 | |
CDRT Holding Corp., 9.25%, 2017 (n)(p) | | | 750,000 | | | | 765,938 | |
Davita, Inc., 6.375%, 2018 | | | 5,225,000 | | | | 5,538,500 | |
Davita, Inc., 6.625%, 2020 | | | 5,625,000 | | | | 6,004,688 | |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, 9%, 2015 (n) | | | 2,540,000 | | | | 2,819,400 | |
Fresenius Medical Care Capital Trust III, 5.625%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,410,000 | | | | 2,551,588 | |
Fresenius Medical Care Capital Trust III, 5.875%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,710,000 | | | | 1,804,050 | |
HCA, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 | | | 7,495,000 | | | | 8,113,338 | |
HCA, Inc., 7.25%, 2020 | | | 1,975,000 | | | | 2,160,156 | |
HCA, Inc., 7.5%, 2022 | | | 5,995,000 | | | | 6,759,363 | |
HCA, Inc., 5.875%, 2022 | | | 2,915,000 | | | | 3,082,613 | |
HealthSouth Corp., 8.125%, 2020 | | | 5,915,000 | | | | 6,476,925 | |
IASIS Healthcare LLC/IASIS Capital Corp., 8.375%, 2019 | | | 2,740,000 | | | | 2,877,000 | |
Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 12.5%, 2019 | | | 825,000 | | | | 871,406 | |
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 9.25%, 2015 | | | 1,805,000 | | | | 1,967,450 | |
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 8%, 2020 | | | 3,460,000 | | | | 3,676,250 | |
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 4.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,610,000 | | | | 2,433,825 | |
Universal Health Services, Inc., 7%, 2018 | | | 2,130,000 | | | | 2,249,813 | |
Universal Health Services, Inc., 7.625%, 2020 | | | 3,560,000 | | | | 3,764,700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 66,839,303 | |
Medical Equipment - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Biomet, Inc., 6.5%, 2020 | | $ | 2,340,000 | | | $ | 2,457,000 | |
Physio-Control International, Inc., 9.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 1,767,000 | | | | 1,961,370 | |
Teleflex, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 | | | 2,975,000 | | | | 3,153,500 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,571,870 | |
Metals & Mining - 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
ArcelorMittal S.A., 6.75%, 2041 | | $ | 1,945,000 | | | $ | 1,801,556 | |
Arch Coal, Inc., 7.25%, 2020 | | | 5,035,000 | | | | 4,078,350 | |
Boart Longyear Ltd., 7%, 2021 (z) | | | 735,000 | | | | 665,175 | |
Century Aluminum Co., 7.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 3,275,000 | | | | 3,045,750 | |
Cloud Peak Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 2017 | | | 5,780,000 | | | | 6,097,900 | |
Cloud Peak Energy, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 | | | 380,000 | | | | 410,400 | |
Commercial Metals Co., 4.875%, 2023 | | | 1,330,000 | | | | 1,236,900 | |
15
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Metals & Mining - continued | | | | | | | | |
Consol Energy, Inc., 8%, 2017 | | $ | 1,985,000 | | | $ | 2,116,506 | |
Consol Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 2,055,000 | | | | 2,214,263 | |
First Quantum Minerals Ltd., 7.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 4,483,000 | | | | 4,370,925 | |
Fortescue Metals Group Ltd., 8.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,405,000 | | | | 3,592,275 | |
Peabody Energy Corp., 6%, 2018 | | | 2,295,000 | | | | 2,346,638 | |
Peabody Energy Corp., 6.25%, 2021 | | | 1,295,000 | | | | 1,269,100 | |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 6.125%, 2019 | | | 4,075,000 | | | | 4,364,973 | |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 8.625%, 2019 | | | 2,150,000 | | | | 2,381,125 | |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 6.5%, 2020 | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,291,500 | |
Walter Energy Inc., 8.5%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,975,000 | | | | 1,604,687 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 42,888,023 | |
Municipals - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1-A”, 4.5%, 2023 (Identified Cost, $1,632,904) | | $ | 1,635,000 | | | $ | 1,520,305 | |
| | |
Natural Gas - Distribution - 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
AmeriGas Finance LLC, 6.75%, 2020 | | $ | 4,255,000 | | | $ | 4,520,938 | |
Ferrellgas LP/Ferrellgas Finance Corp., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 1,735,000 | | | | 1,752,350 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,273,288 | |
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 3.3% | | | | | | | | |
Access Midstream Partners Co., 4.875%, 2023 | | $ | 2,410,000 | | | $ | 2,289,500 | |
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP, 4.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,050,000 | | | | 963,375 | |
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP, 5.875%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,865,000 | | | | 1,781,075 | |
Crosstex Energy, Inc., 8.875%, 2018 | | | 5,455,000 | | | | 5,809,575 | |
El Paso Corp., 7%, 2017 | | | 3,790,000 | | | | 4,222,761 | |
El Paso Corp., 7.75%, 2032 | | | 5,250,000 | | | | 5,578,078 | |
Energy Transfer Equity LP, 7.5%, 2020 | | | 3,955,000 | | | | 4,454,319 | |
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 8.375% to 2016, FRN to 2066 | | | 1,721,000 | | | | 1,918,915 | |
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 7.034% to 2018, FRN to 2068 | | | 1,047,000 | | | | 1,175,258 | |
Inergy Midstream LP, 6%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,815,000 | | | | 3,834,075 | |
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 5.5%, 2023 | | | 2,150,000 | | | | 2,171,500 | |
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 4.5%, 2023 | | | 1,744,000 | | | | 1,639,360 | |
Sabine Pass Liquefaction, 5.625%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,225,000 | | | | 2,194,406 | |
Sabine Pass Liquefaction, 5.625%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,750,000 | | | | 2,681,250 | |
Summit Midstream Holdings LLC, 7.5%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,535,000 | | | | 1,565,700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 42,279,147 | |
Network & Telecom - 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Centurylink, Inc., 6.45%, 2021 | | $ | 755,000 | | | $ | 796,525 | |
Centurylink, Inc., 7.65%, 2042 | | | 3,030,000 | | | | 2,863,350 | |
Citizens Communications Co., 9%, 2031 | | | 2,330,000 | | | | 2,283,400 | |
Frontier Communications Corp., 8.125%, 2018 | | | 1,030,000 | | | | 1,148,450 | |
TW Telecom Holdings, Inc., 5.375%, 2022 | | | 1,930,000 | | | | 1,939,650 | |
Windstream Corp., 8.125%, 2018 | | | 570,000 | | | | 607,050 | |
16
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Network & Telecom - continued | | | | | | | | |
Windstream Corp., 7.75%, 2020 | | $ | 2,615,000 | | | $ | 2,784,975 | |
Windstream Corp., 7.75%, 2021 | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,278,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 13,701,400 | |
Oil Services - 1.6% | | | | | | | | |
Bristow Group, Inc., 6.25%, 2022 | | $ | 2,720,000 | | | $ | 2,828,800 | |
Chesapeake Oilfield Operating LLC, 6.625%, 2019 | | | 1,035,000 | | | | 1,045,350 | |
Dresser-Rand Group, Inc., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 1,384,500 | |
Edgen Murray Corp., 8.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,985,000 | | | | 3,985,000 | |
Pacific Drilling S.A., 5.375%, 2020 (z) | | | 2,300,000 | | | | 2,254,000 | |
Shale-Inland Holdings LLC/Finance Co., 8.75%, 2019 (n) | | | 4,290,000 | | | | 4,450,875 | |
Unit Corp., 6.625%, 2021 | | | 4,060,000 | | | | 4,222,400 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 20,170,925 | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 5.5%, 2017 | | $ | 7,745,000 | | | $ | 8,188,208 | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 6.25%, 2017 | | | 2,680,000 | | | | 2,903,555 | |
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 2019, FRN to 2049 (n) | | | 3,791,000 | | | | 4,686,624 | |
LBG Capital No. 1 PLC, 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 5,525,000 | | | | 5,845,450 | |
Santander UK PLC, 8.963% to 2030, FRN to 2049 | | | 6,666,000 | | | | 8,332,500 | |
UBS AG, 7.625%, 2022 | | | 1,460,000 | | | | 1,624,279 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 31,580,616 | |
Pharmaceuticals - 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Capsugel FinanceCo. SCA, 9.875%, 2019 (n) | | EUR | 1,370,000 | | | $ | 2,039,011 | |
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 7%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 3,750,000 | | | | 3,975,000 | |
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 7.25%, 2022 (n) | | | 2,800,000 | | | | 2,975,000 | |
Vantage Point Imaging, 7.5%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,850,000 | | | | 1,984,125 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,973,136 | |
Pollution Control - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Heckmann Corp., 9.875%, 2018 | | $ | 2,855,000 | | | $ | 2,933,513 | |
| | |
Precious Metals & Minerals - 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Eldorado Gold Corp., 6.125%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 2,785,000 | | | $ | 2,673,600 | |
IAMGOLD Corp., 6.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 4,082,000 | | | | 3,469,700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,143,300 | |
Printing & Publishing - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
American Media, Inc., 13.5%, 2018 (z) | | $ | 297,449 | | | $ | 300,423 | |
Gannett Co., Inc., 5.125%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,645,000 | | | | 1,640,888 | |
Lamar Media Corp., 5%, 2023 | | | 1,735,000 | | | | 1,661,263 | |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 7.75%, 2018 | | | 2,760,000 | | | | 3,001,500 | |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 4.5%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,970,000 | | | | 2,918,025 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 9,522,099 | |
Railroad & Shipping - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Kansas City Southern de Mexico S.A. de C.V., 6.125%, 2021 | | $ | 229,000 | | | $ | 257,625 | |
Watco Cos. LLC, 6.375%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,570,000 | | | | 1,566,075 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,823,700 | |
17
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate - 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc., REIT, 7.25%, 2019 | | $ | 1,815,000 | | | $ | 1,846,763 | |
DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc., REIT, 8.5%, 2017 | | | 2,930,000 | | | | 3,113,125 | |
ERP Properties, REIT, 7.75%, 2020 | | | 3,050,000 | | | | 3,471,086 | |
ERP Properties, REIT, 5.75%, 2022 | | | 815,000 | | | | 829,450 | |
Felcor Lodging LP, REIT, 5.625%, 2023 | | | 485,000 | | | | 472,875 | |
Kennedy Wilson, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 | | | 1,220,000 | | | | 1,323,700 | |
MPT Operating Partnership LP, REIT, 6.875%, 2021 | | | 2,435,000 | | | | 2,599,363 | |
MPT Operating Partnership LP, REIT, 6.375%, 2022 | | | 3,215,000 | | | | 3,383,788 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 17,040,150 | |
Retailers - 2.6% | | | | | | | | |
Academy Ltd., 9.25%, 2019 (n) | | $ | 1,565,000 | | | $ | 1,752,800 | |
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp., 10%, 2019 | | | 3,540,000 | | | �� | 3,955,950 | |
CST Brands, Inc., 5%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,090,000 | | | | 1,076,375 | |
J. Crew Group, Inc., 8.125%, 2019 | | | 3,160,000 | | | | 3,349,600 | |
Jo-Ann Stores Holdings, Inc., 9.75%, 2019 (n)(p) | | | 1,655,000 | | | | 1,721,200 | |
Limited Brands, Inc., 6.9%, 2017 | | | 1,960,000 | | | | 2,214,800 | |
Limited Brands, Inc., 7%, 2020 | | | 1,520,000 | | | | 1,696,700 | |
Limited Brands, Inc., 6.95%, 2033 | | | 1,080,000 | | | | 1,080,000 | |
Rite Aid Corp., 9.25%, 2020 | | | 4,640,000 | | | | 5,167,800 | |
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 | | | 1,755,000 | | | | 1,921,725 | |
The Pantry, Inc., 8.375%, 2020 | | | 1,285,000 | | | | 1,387,800 | |
Toys “R” Us Property Co. II LLC, 8.5%, 2017 | | | 1,766,000 | | | | 1,865,338 | |
Toys “R” Us, Inc., 10.75%, 2017 | | | 4,665,000 | | | | 4,933,284 | |
YCC Holdings LLC/Yankee Finance, Inc., 10.25%, 2016 (p) | | | 1,260,000 | | | | 1,294,663 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 33,418,035 | |
Specialty Chemicals - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Chemtura Corp., 5.75%, 2021 | | $ | 800,000 | | | $ | 796,000 | |
Eagle Spinco, Inc., 4.625%, 2021 (n) | | | 625,000 | | | | 600,000 | |
Koppers, Inc., 7.875%, 2019 | | | 1,835,000 | | | | 1,958,863 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,354,863 | |
Specialty Stores - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Michaels Stores, Inc., 11.375%, 2016 | | $ | 1,249,000 | | | $ | 1,302,095 | |
Michaels Stores, Inc., 7.75%, 2018 | | | 1,980,000 | | | | 2,145,825 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,447,920 | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - 4.0% | | | | | | | | |
Clearwire Corp., 12%, 2015 (n) | | $ | 3,140,000 | | | $ | 3,328,400 | |
Cricket Communications, Inc., 7.75%, 2020 | | | 2,250,000 | | | | 2,559,375 | |
Crown Castle International Corp., 7.125%, 2019 | | | 4,420,000 | | | | 4,762,550 | |
Crown Castle International Corp., 5.25%, 2023 | | | 1,655,000 | | | | 1,592,938 | |
Digicel Group Ltd., 8.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 3,050,000 | | | | 3,179,625 | |
18
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - continued | | | | | | | | |
Digicel Group Ltd., 10.5%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 2,540,000 | | | $ | 2,755,900 | |
Eileme 2 AB, 11.625%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,149,000 | | | | 2,514,330 | |
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 7.875%, 2018 | | | 2,835,000 | | | | 3,075,975 | |
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 6.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,745,000 | | | | 1,779,900 | |
Sprint Capital Corp., 6.875%, 2028 | | | 3,280,000 | | | | 3,017,600 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 6%, 2016 | | | 4,115,000 | | | | 4,372,188 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 8.375%, 2017 | | | 3,611,000 | | | | 4,080,430 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 9%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,350,000 | | | | 1,599,750 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 6%, 2022 | | | 3,600,000 | | | | 3,465,000 | |
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 11.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 3,205,000 | | | | 3,381,275 | |
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 7.25%, 2018 (n) | | | 4,710,000 | | | | 4,851,300 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 50,316,536 | |
Telephone Services - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Cogent Communications Group, Inc., 8.375%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 1,240,000 | | | $ | 1,354,700 | |
Level 3 Financing, Inc., 9.375%, 2019 | | | 2,095,000 | | | | 2,325,450 | |
Level 3 Financing, Inc., 8.625%, 2020 | | | 1,315,000 | | | | 1,446,500 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 5,126,650 | |
Transportation - Services - 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
Aguila 3 S.A., 7.875%, 2018 (z) | | $ | 765,000 | | | $ | 791,775 | |
Aguila American Resources Ltd., 7.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,765,000 | | | | 2,861,775 | |
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC, 8.25%, 2019 | | | 1,980,000 | | | | 2,163,150 | |
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC, 9.75%, 2020 | | | 1,130,000 | | | | 1,317,863 | |
CEVA Group PLC, 8.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 6,630,000 | | | | 6,663,150 | |
Navios Maritime Acquisition Corp., 8.625%, 2017 | | | 4,575,000 | | | | 4,758,000 | |
Navios Maritime Holdings, Inc., 8.875%, 2017 | | | 1,310,000 | | | | 1,373,863 | |
Navios South American Logistics, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 | | | 2,457,000 | | | | 2,647,418 | |
Navios South American Logistics, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 421,000 | | | | 453,628 | |
Swift Services Holdings, Inc., 10%, 2018 | | | 6,360,000 | | | | 7,107,300 | |
Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Ltd., 8.875%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,540,000 | | | | 1,570,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 31,708,722 | |
Utilities - Electric Power - 3.6% | | | | | | | | |
AES Corp., 8%, 2017 | | $ | 312,000 | | | $ | 361,920 | |
AES Corp., 7.375%, 2021 | | | 2,560,000 | | | | 2,892,800 | |
AES Corp., 4.875%, 2023 | | | 290,000 | | | | 275,500 | |
Calpine Corp., 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 4,162,000 | | | | 4,515,770 | |
Covanta Holding Corp., 7.25%, 2020 | | | 3,565,000 | | | | 3,854,239 | |
Covanta Holding Corp., 6.375%, 2022 | | | 850,000 | | | | 874,544 | |
EDP Finance B.V., 6%, 2018 (n) | | | 4,590,000 | | | | 4,758,820 | |
Energy Future Holdings Corp., 10%, 2020 | | | 10,671,000 | | | | 11,551,358 | |
Energy Future Holdings Corp., 10%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,565,000 | | | | 3,850,200 | |
Energy Future Holdings Corp., 12.25%, 2022 (n) | | | 3,010,000 | | | | 3,348,625 | |
19
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Utilities - Electric Power - continued | | | | | | | | |
InterGen N.V., 7%, 2023 (z) | | $ | 1,925,000 | | | $ | 1,920,188 | |
NRG Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 4,950,000 | | | | 5,494,500 | |
NRG Energy, Inc., 6.625%, 2023 | | | 590,000 | | | | 604,750 | |
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC, 11.5%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,345,000 | | | | 1,008,750 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 45,311,964 | |
Utilities - Gas - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Suburban Propane Partners LP, 7.5%, 2018 | | $ | 625,000 | | | $ | 675,000 | |
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $1,164,150,430) | | | | | | $ | 1,190,277,879 | |
| | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - 1.9% | | | | | | | | |
Aerospace - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
TransDigm, Inc., Term Loan C, 3.75%, 2020 | | $ | 1,800,862 | | | $ | 1,809,357 | |
| | |
Building - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
ABC Supply Co., Inc., Term Loan B, 3.5%, 2020 | | $ | 685,253 | | | $ | 685,376 | |
| | |
Conglomerates - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Silver II U.S. Holdings LLC, Term Loan B, 4%, 2019 | | $ | 1,763,735 | | | $ | 1,761,517 | |
| | |
Consumer Services - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Realogy Corp., Term Loan B, 4.5%, 2016 | | $ | 1,176,215 | | | $ | 1,185,771 | |
| | |
Energy - Independent - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
MEG Energy Corp., Term Loan B, 3.75%, 2020 | | $ | 1,628,819 | | | $ | 1,636,455 | |
| | |
Entertainment - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Cedar Fair LP, Term Loan B, 3.25%, 2020 | | $ | 1,526,328 | | | $ | 1,533,960 | |
| | |
Food & Beverages - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Aramark Corp., Term Loan D, 4%, 2019 | | $ | 1,810,061 | | | $ | 1,825,899 | |
H.J. Heinz Co., Term Loan B2, 3.5%, 2020 | | | 1,037,494 | | | | 1,046,572 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,872,471 | |
Retailers - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Rite Aid Corp., Term Loan, 4.87%, 2021 | | $ | 1,149,016 | | | $ | 1,156,197 | |
Toys ‘‘R’’ Us, Inc., Term Loan B, 2019 (o) | | | 2,246,193 | | | | 2,223,731 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,379,928 | |
Transportation - Services - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
American Commercial Lines, Inc, Term Loan, 7.5%, 2019 | | $ | 5,679,797 | | | $ | 5,367,409 | |
20
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - continued | | | | | | | | |
Utilities - Electric Power - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Calpine Construction Finance Co., Term Loan B, 3%, 2020 | | $ | 3,631,684 | | | $ | 3,600,361 | |
Total Floating Rate Loans (Identified Cost, $24,046,992) | | | $ | 23,832,605 | |
| | |
Common Stocks - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Automotive - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Accuride Corp. (a) | | | 65,068 | | | $ | 372,189 | |
| | |
Printing & Publishing - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
American Media Operations, Inc. (a) | | | 76,223 | | | $ | 397,122 | |
Total Common Stocks (Identified Cost, $2,168,949) | | | | | | $ | 769,311 | |
| | |
Convertible Preferred Stocks - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Automotive - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
General Motors Co., 4.75% (Identified Cost, $2,153,000) | | | 43,060 | | | $ | 2,150,416 | |
| | |
Convertible Bonds - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Network & Telecom - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Nortel Networks Corp., 2.125%, 2014 (Identified Cost, $2,544,238) (a)(d) | | $ | 2,570,000 | | | $ | 2,525,025 | |
| | |
Preferred Stocks - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 7% (z) | | | 2,489 | | | $ | 2,465,510 | |
GMAC Capital Trust I, 8.125% | | | 90,100 | | | | 2,392,155 | |
Total Preferred Stocks (Identified Cost, $4,658,622) | | | | | | $ | 4,857,665 | |
| | |
Issuer/Expiration Date/Strike Price | | Number of Contracts | | | | |
Call Options Purchased - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
iShares Russell 2000 Index - September 2013 @ $106 (Premiums Paid, $397,475) | | | 2,970 | | | $ | 454,410 | |
| | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | | |
Money Market Funds - 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.08%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | | | 30,464,902 | | | $ | 30,464,902 | |
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $1,230,584,608) | | | $ | 1,255,332,213 | |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 1.1% | | | | | | | 14,329,453 | |
Net Assets - 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 1,269,661,666 | |
21
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(d) | In default. Interest and/or scheduled principal payment(s) have been missed. |
(g) | The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on settled positions at period end, unless otherwise indicated. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $361,372,371 representing 28.5% of net assets. |
(o) | All or a portion of this position has not settled. Upon settlement date, interest rates for unsettled amounts will be determined. The rate shown, if any, represents the weighted average coupon rate for settled amounts. |
(p) | Payment-in-kind security. |
(r) | Remaining maturities of floating rate loans may be less than stated maturities shown as a result of contractual or optional prepayments by the borrower. Such prepayments cannot be predicted with certainty. These loans may be subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans generally have rates of interest which are determined periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Securities | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | | Value | |
Aguila 3 S.A., 7.875%, 2018 | | 7/30/13 | | | $786,038 | | | | $791,775 | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 7% (Preferred Stock) | | 4/13/11-11/27/12 | | | 2,370,188 | | | | 2,465,510 | |
American Media, Inc., 13.5%, 2018 | | 12/28/10 | | | 301,035 | | | | 300,423 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 4.875%, 2022 | | 6/05/13 | | | 1,311,640 | | | | 1,312,875 | |
Audatex North America, Inc., 6%, 2021 | | 6/27/13 | | | 1,590,000 | | | | 1,617,825 | |
Boart Longyear Ltd., 7%, 2021 | | 6/04/13 | | | 724,134 | | | | 665,175 | |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “E2”, 6%, 2045 | | 3/20/06-5/25/13 | | | 1,267,469 | | | | 13,073 | |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “F”, FRN, 1.564%, 2050 | | 4/12/06-4/26/13 | | | 649,416 | | | | 1,624 | |
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., CDO, “G”, FRN, 1.764%, 2050 | | 4/12/06-4/26/13 | | | 2,027,418 | | | | 5,069 | |
22
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Securities - continued | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | | Value | |
Chester Downs & Marina LLC, 9.25%, 2020 | | 6/18/13-6/27/13 | | | $1,740,984 | | | | $1,732,500 | |
Dematic S.A., 7.75%, 2020 | | 12/13/12-7/29/13 | | | 4,980,946 | | | | 5,067,788 | |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 11.364%, 2025 | | 1/29/03 | | | 92,888 | | | | 177,603 | |
G-Force LLC, CDO, “A2”, 4.83%, 2036 | | 1/20/11-2/14/11 | | | 591,284 | | | | 609,627 | |
Heckler & Koch GmbH, 9.5%, 2018 | | 5/06/11-1/02/13 | | | 2,357,410 | | | | 2,134,108 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 6%, 2020 | | 7/29/13 | | | 1,785,000 | | | | 1,785,000 | |
InterGen N.V., 7%, 2023 | | 6/07/13-7/24/13 | | | 1,910,387 | | | | 1,920,188 | |
LBI Media, Inc., 13.5% to 2015, 11.5% to , 2020 | | 1/02/13-5/17/13 | | | 446,396 | | | | 333,531 | |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 | | 12/10/07-2/06/13 | | | 3,180,890 | | | | 3,233,915 | |
Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, 6.25%, 2021 | | 7/23/13 | | | 280,000 | | | | 281,400 | |
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.385%, 2039 | | 7/20/04 | | | 120,397 | | | | 132,938 | |
NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC, 5%, 2018 | | 7/30/13 | | | 1,528,500 | | | | 1,540,900 | |
NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5.25%, 2023 | | 7/16/13-7/31/13 | | | 1,643,688 | | | | 1,640,000 | |
Nara Cable Funding Ltd., 8.875%, 2018 | | 7/17/13 | | | 1,056,113 | | | | 1,034,250 | |
PNK Finance Corp., 6.375%, 2021 | | 7/30/13 | | | 1,090,000 | | | | 1,098,175 | |
Pacific Drilling S.A., 5.375%, 2020 | | 6/05/13-6/17/13 | | | 2,241,289 | | | | 2,254,000 | |
Peninsula Gaming LLC, 8.375%, 2018 | | 6/26/13 | | | 758,743 | | | | 790,225 | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC, 4.875%, 2021 | | 6/11/13 | | | 612,935 | | | | 581,250 | |
Quiksilver, Inc., 10%, 2020 | | 1/07/13 | | | 271,597 | | | | 283,938 | |
Renaissance Acquisition, 6.875%, 2021 | | 7/22/13 | | | 3,400,000 | | | | 3,383,000 | |
Summit Midstream Holdings LLC, 7.5%, 2021 | | 6/12/13 | | | 1,535,000 | | | | 1,565,700 | |
Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 2021 | | 7/19/13 | | | 1,401,667 | | | | 1,398,488 | |
Tronox Finance LLC, 6.375%, 2020 | | 7/15/13-7/31/13 | | | 1,634,515 | | | | 1,613,388 | |
Vantage Point Imaging, 7.5%, 2021 | | 6/27/13 | | | 1,850,000 | | | | 1,984,125 | |
Walter Energy Inc., 8.5%, 2021 | | 7/15/13-7/25/13 | | | 1,718,812 | | | | 1,604,687 | |
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | $45,354,073 | |
% of Net assets | | | | | | | | | 3.6% | |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
FRN | | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | | Public Limited Company |
REIT | | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Abbreviations indicate amounts shown in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. All amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. A list of abbreviations is shown below:
23
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Derivative Contracts at 7/31/13
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 7/31/13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type | | Currency | | Counter- party | | Contracts to Deliver/ Receive | | | Settlement Date Range | | | In Exchange for | | | Contracts at Value | | | Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Liability Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SELL | | EUR | | Deutsche Bank AG | | �� | 4,946,240 | | | | 10/18/13 | | | | $6,343,108 | | | | $6,582,092 | | | | $(238,984 | ) |
SELL | | EUR | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | | 4,946,240 | | | | 10/18/13 | | | | 6,343,612 | | | | 6,582,092 | | | | (238,480 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $(477,464 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Swap Agreements at 7/31/13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expiration | | | | | Notional Amount | | | Counterparty | | Cash Flows to Receive | | Cash Flows to Pay | | Fair Value | |
Asset Derivatives | |
Credit Default Swap Agreements | |
12/20/17 | | | USD | | | | 12,890,000 | | | Goldman Sachs International (a) | | 5.0% (fixed rate) | | (1) | | | $939,780 | |
12/20/17 | | | USD | | | | 5,000,000 | | | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (a) | | 5.0% (fixed rate) | | (1) | | | 364,538 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $1,304,318 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Fund, as protection seller, to pay notional amount upon a defined credit event by a reference obligation specified in the CDX.NA.HY.19 Index, a B rated credit default index. The fund entered into the agreement to manage market/sector exposure. |
(a) | Net unamortized premiums paid by the fund amounted to $716,639. |
The credit ratings presented here are an indicator of the current payment/performance risk of the related swap agreement, the reference obligation for which may be either a single security or, in the case of a credit default index, a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers. Ratings are assigned to each reference security, including each individual security within a reference basket of securities, utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). The ratings for a credit default index are calculated by MFS as a weighted average of the external credit ratings of the individual securities that compose the index’s reference basket of securities.
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 7/31/13 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
| | | | |
Assets | | | | |
Investments- | | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $1,200,119,706) | | | $1,224,867,311 | |
Underlying affiliated funds, at cost and value | | | 30,464,902 | |
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $1,230,584,608) | | | $1,255,332,213 | |
Cash | | | 6,943 | |
Receivables for | | | | |
Investments sold | | | 7,814,881 | |
Fund shares sold | | | 541,502 | |
Interest and dividends | | | 23,517,607 | |
Swaps, at value (net unamortized premiums paid, $716,639) | | | 1,304,318 | |
Other assets | | | 2,864 | |
Total assets | | | $1,288,520,328 | |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payables for | | | | |
Distributions | | | $473,991 | |
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 477,464 | |
Investments purchased | | | 14,583,955 | |
Fund shares reacquired | | | 2,611,777 | |
Payable to affiliates | | | | |
Investment adviser | | | 32,203 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 547,332 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 1,632 | |
Program manager fees | | | 13 | |
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | | | 60,592 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 69,703 | |
Total liabilities | | | $18,858,662 | |
Net assets | | | $1,269,661,666 | |
Net assets consist of | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | $1,445,938,789 | |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | | 24,862,046 | |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (197,435,483 | ) |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (3,703,686 | ) |
Net assets | | | $1,269,661,666 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | | | 356,819,124 | |
25
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net assets | | | Shares outstanding | | | Net asset value per share (a) | |
Class A | | | $469,371,780 | | | | 131,921,968 | | | | $3.56 | |
Class B | | | 31,468,115 | | | | 8,828,639 | | | | 3.56 | |
Class C | | | 74,983,033 | | | | 20,998,673 | | | | 3.57 | |
Class I | | | 64,717,747 | | | | 18,219,863 | | | | 3.55 | |
Class R1 | | | 1,177,769 | | | | 330,511 | | | | 3.56 | |
Class R2 | | | 3,862,989 | | | | 1,085,148 | | | | 3.56 | |
Class R3 | | | 7,843,659 | | | | 2,205,014 | | | | 3.56 | |
Class R4 | | | 451,754 | | | | 126,917 | | | | 3.56 | |
Class R5 | | | 610,940,210 | | | | 171,741,360 | | | | 3.56 | |
Class 529A | | | 2,994,970 | | | | 841,965 | | | | 3.56 | |
Class 529B | | | 358,939 | | | | 100,898 | | | | 3.56 | |
Class 529C | | | 1,490,701 | | | | 418,168 | | | | 3.56 | |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Classes A and 529A, for which the maximum offering prices per share were $3.74 [100 / 95.25 x $3.56] and $3.74 [100 / 95.25 x $3.56], respectively. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering prices of Class A and Class 529A shares are reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, Class C, Class 529B, and Class 529C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Classes I, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and 529A. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended 7/31/13 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | | |
Income | | | | |
Interest | | | $40,367,940 | |
Dividends | | | 239,588 | |
Dividends from underlying affiliated funds | | | 32,089 | |
Total investment income | | | $40,639,617 | |
Expenses | | | | |
Management fee | | | $2,849,799 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 1,192,468 | |
Program manager fees | | | 2,380 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 748,105 | |
Administrative services fee | | | 82,423 | |
Independent Trustees’ compensation | | | 16,780 | |
Custodian fee | | | 86,942 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 36,237 | |
Audit and tax fees | | | 36,893 | |
Legal fees | | | 7,262 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 94,761 | |
Total expenses | | | $5,154,050 | |
Fees paid indirectly | | | (699 | ) |
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser and/or distributor | | | (27,478 | ) |
Net expenses | | | $5,125,873 | |
Net investment income | | | $35,513,744 | |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | |
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | | | | |
Investments | | | $15,528,165 | |
Swap agreements | | | 435,485 | |
Foreign currency | | | 271,068 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | $16,234,718 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | |
Investments | | | $(31,958,817 | ) |
Swap agreements | | | 587,679 | |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | | (26,326 | ) |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | $(31,397,464 | ) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | $(15,162,746 | ) |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $20,350,998 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Year ended 1/31/13 | |
Change in net assets | | (unaudited) | | | | |
From operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | $35,513,744 | | | | $71,096,364 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 16,234,718 | | | | 3,618,120 | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | (31,397,464 | ) | | | 52,793,031 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $20,350,998 | | | | $127,507,515 | |
Distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(37,628,192 | ) | | | $(73,590,229 | ) |
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | | | $63,908,715 | | | | $139,293,851 | |
Total change in net assets | | | $46,631,521 | | | | $193,211,137 | |
Net assets | | | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | | | 1,223,030,145 | | | | 1,029,819,008 | |
At end of period (including accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $3,703,686 and $1,589,238, respectively) | | | $1,269,661,666 | | | | $1,223,030,145 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Financial Statements
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class A | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.49 | | | | $3.58 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.10 | | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.25 | | | | $0.25 | | | | $0.26 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.04 | ) | | | 0.18 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | 0.26 | | | | 0.77 | | | | (1.08 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.06 | | | | $0.40 | | | | $0.16 | | | | $0.51 | | | | $1.02 | | | | $(0.82 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.27 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.27 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.56 | | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.49 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 1.59 | (n) | | | 12.05 | | | | 4.77 | | | | 16.22 | | | | 42.99 | | | | (24.05 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 0.92 | (a) | | | 0.93 | | | | 0.93 | | | | 0.93 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 1.05 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 0.91 | (a) | | | 0.93 | | | | 0.92 | | | | 0.93 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 1.05 | |
Net investment income | | | 5.66 | (a) | | | 6.39 | | | | 6.76 | | | | 7.53 | | | | 8.68 | | | | 8.22 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $469,372 | | | | $504,600 | | | | $462,232 | | | | $501,139 | | | | $531,990 | | | | $360,076 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class B | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.53 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.50 | | | | $3.59 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.09 | | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.21 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.24 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.18 | | | | (0.09 | ) | | | 0.26 | | | | 0.76 | | | | (1.08 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.04 | | | | $0.38 | | | | $0.12 | | | | $0.49 | | | | $0.99 | | | | $(0.84 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.56 | | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.53 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.50 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 1.21 | (n) | | | 11.22 | | | | 3.70 | | | | 15.69 | | | | 41.40 | | | | (24.51 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.67 | (a) | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.75 | | | | 1.75 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.67 | (a) | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.75 | | | | 1.75 | |
Net investment income | | | 4.88 | (a) | | | 5.59 | | | | 5.99 | | | | 6.78 | | | | 8.11 | | | | 7.41 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $31,468 | | | | $31,656 | | | | $25,983 | | | | $37,772 | | | | $46,690 | | | | $52,384 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class C | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.62 | | | | $3.45 | | | | $3.53 | | | | $3.27 | | | | $2.50 | | | | $3.60 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.09 | | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.21 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.24 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.18 | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | 0.25 | | | | 0.77 | | | | (1.09 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.04 | | | | $0.38 | | | | $0.13 | | | | $0.48 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $(0.85 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.57 | | | | $3.62 | | | | $3.45 | | | | $3.53 | | | | $3.27 | | | | $2.50 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 1.21 | (n) | | | 11.21 | | | | 4.00 | | | | 15.34 | | | | 41.82 | | | | (24.72 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.67 | (a) | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.74 | | | | 1.75 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.67 | (a) | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.74 | | | | 1.75 | |
Net investment income | | | 4.88 | (a) | | | 5.61 | | | | 5.99 | | | | 6.74 | | | | 7.80 | | | | 7.44 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $74,983 | | | | $81,710 | | | | $75,309 | | | | $80,802 | | | | $73,475 | | | | $39,345 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class I | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.60 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.25 | | | | $2.49 | | | | $3.58 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.11 | | | | $0.24 | | | | $0.24 | | | | $0.26 | | | | $0.26 | | | | $0.27 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.16 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | 0.27 | | | | 0.76 | | | | (1.08 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.06 | | | | $0.40 | | | | $0.17 | | | | $0.53 | | | | $1.02 | | | | $(0.81 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) | | | $(0.28 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) | | | $(0.28 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.55 | | | | $3.60 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.25 | | | | $2.49 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 1.71 | (n) | | | 12.02 | | | | 5.03 | | | | 16.86 | | | | 42.90 | | | | (23.82 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 0.67 | (a) | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.75 | | | | 0.76 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 0.67 | (a) | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.75 | | | | 0.76 | |
Net investment income | | | 5.91 | (a) | | | 6.86 | | | | 7.02 | | | | 7.75 | | | | 8.97 | | | | 8.55 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $64,718 | | | | $70,506 | | | | $448,607 | | | | $386,185 | | | | $283,704 | | | | $185,811 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R1 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.50 | | | | $3.59 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.09 | | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.21 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.24 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.18 | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | 0.25 | | | | 0.76 | | | | (1.09 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.04 | | | | $0.38 | | | | $0.13 | | | | $0.48 | | | | $0.99 | | | | $(0.85 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.56 | | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.50 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 1.21 | (n) | | | 11.22 | | | | 4.00 | | | | 15.36 | | | | 41.39 | | | | (24.52 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.67 | (a) | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.74 | | | | 1.76 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.67 | (a) | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.74 | | | | 1.76 | |
Net investment income | | | 4.89 | (a) | | | 5.65 | | | | 6.01 | | | | 6.78 | | | | 7.96 | | | | 7.53 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $1,178 | | | | $1,137 | | | | $1,201 | | | | $1,138 | | | | $1,200 | | | | $937 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
33
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R2 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.49 | | | | $3.58 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.10 | | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.24 | | | | $0.24 | | | | $0.25 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.17 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | 0.26 | | | | 0.78 | | | | (1.08 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.05 | | | | $0.39 | | | | $0.15 | | | | $0.50 | | | | $1.02 | | | | $(0.83 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.10 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.10 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.56 | | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.49 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 1.47 | (n) | | | 11.77 | | | | 4.51 | | | | 15.93 | | | | 42.65 | | | | (24.21 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.17 | (a) | | | 1.18 | | | | 1.18 | | | | 1.18 | | | | 1.25 | | | | 1.25 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.17 | (a) | | | 1.18 | | | | 1.17 | | | | 1.18 | | | | 1.25 | | | | 1.25 | |
Net investment income | | | 5.40 | (a) | | | 6.18 | | | | 6.52 | | | | 7.27 | | | | 8.47 | | | | 7.99 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $3,863 | | | | $4,103 | | | | $5,639 | | | | $5,653 | | | | $5,251 | | | | $3,446 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
34
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R3 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.25 | | | | $2.49 | | | | $3.58 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.10 | | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.25 | | | | $0.25 | | | | $0.26 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.04 | ) | | | 0.18 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | 0.27 | | | | 0.76 | | | | (1.08 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.06 | | | | $0.40 | | | | $0.16 | | | | $0.52 | | | | $1.01 | | | | $(0.82 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.27 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.27 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.56 | | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.25 | | | | $2.49 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 1.59 | (n) | | | 12.05 | | | | 4.77 | | | | 16.58 | | | | 42.55 | | | | (24.02 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 0.92 | (a) | | | 0.93 | | | | 0.93 | | | | 0.93 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 1.01 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 0.92 | (a) | | | 0.93 | | | | 0.93 | | | | 0.93 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 1.01 | |
Net investment income | | | 5.65 | (a) | | | 6.39 | | | | 6.78 | | | | 7.54 | | | | 8.75 | | | | 8.35 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $7,844 | | | | $8,183 | | | | $7,376 | | | | $7,281 | | | | $7,929 | | | | $6,706 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
35
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R4 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.49 | | | | $3.58 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.10 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.24 | | | | $0.26 | | | | $0.26 | | | | $0.27 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.04 | ) | | | 0.18 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | 0.26 | | | | 0.77 | | | | (1.08 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.06 | | | | $0.41 | | | | $0.17 | | | | $0.52 | | | | $1.03 | | | | $(0.81 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) | | | $(0.28 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) | | | $(0.28 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.56 | | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.49 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 1.72 | (n) | | | 12.33 | | | | 5.04 | | | | 16.50 | | | | 43.33 | | | | (23.82 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 0.67 | (a) | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.74 | | | | 0.76 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 0.67 | (a) | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.74 | | | | 0.76 | |
Net investment income | | | 5.87 | (a) | | | 6.65 | | | | 7.02 | | | | 7.72 | | | | 8.78 | | | | 8.56 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $452 | | | | $302 | | | | $331 | | | | $316 | | | | $148 | | | | $44 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
36
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Class R5 | | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Period ended 1/13/13 (i) | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.41 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.11 | | | | $0.15 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.21 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.06 | | | | $0.36 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.16 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.56 | | | | $3.61 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 1.75 | (n) | | | 10.74 | (n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 0.60 | (a) | | | 0.63 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 0.60 | (a) | | | 0.63 | (a) |
Net investment income | | | 5.95 | (a) | | | 6.37 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $610,940 | | | | $516,399 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
37
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class 529A | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.43 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.25 | | | | $2.49 | | | | $3.58 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.10 | | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.25 | | | | $0.25 | | | | $0.25 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.04 | ) | | | 0.19 | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | 0.26 | | | | 0.76 | | | | (1.08 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.06 | | | | $0.41 | | | | $0.15 | | | | $0.51 | | | | $1.01 | | | | $(0.83 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.11 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.56 | | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.43 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.25 | | | | $2.49 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 1.57 | (n) | | | 12.33 | | | | 4.40 | | | | 16.46 | | | | 42.40 | | | | (24.19 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.02 | (a) | | | 1.03 | | | | 1.03 | | | | 1.03 | | | | 1.10 | | | | 1.23 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 0.95 | (a) | | | 0.98 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 1.03 | | | | 1.10 | | | | 1.23 | |
Net investment income | | | 5.62 | (a) | | | 6.31 | | | | 6.71 | | | | 7.41 | | | | 8.62 | | | | 8.07 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $2,995 | | | | $2,748 | | | | $1,719 | | | | $1,215 | | | | $858 | | | | $579 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
38
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class 529B | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.25 | | | | $2.49 | | | | $3.58 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.09 | | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.23 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.17 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | 0.27 | | | | 0.76 | | | | (1.08 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.04 | | | | $0.37 | | | | $0.13 | | | | $0.49 | | | | $0.99 | | | | $(0.85 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.20 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.20 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.56 | | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.25 | | | | $2.49 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 1.19 | (n) | | | 11.17 | | | | 3.92 | | | | 15.60 | | | | 41.40 | | | | (24.70 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.77 | (a) | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.84 | | | | 1.88 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.72 | (a) | | | 1.73 | | | | 1.75 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.84 | | | | 1.88 | |
Net investment income | | | 4.85 | (a) | | | 5.60 | | | | 5.95 | | | | 6.65 | | | | 7.82 | | | | 7.43 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $359 | | | | $375 | | | | $362 | | | | $398 | | | | $315 | | | | $183 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
39
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class 529C | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.50 | | | | $3.59 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.09 | | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.23 | | | | $0.23 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.17 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | 0.26 | | | | 0.76 | | | | (1.08 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.04 | | | | $0.37 | | | | $0.13 | | | | $0.48 | | | | $0.99 | | | | $(0.85 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.20 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.20 | ) | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.22 | ) | | | $(0.23 | ) | | | $(0.24 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $3.56 | | | | $3.61 | | | | $3.44 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $3.26 | | | | $2.50 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 1.19 | (n) | | | 11.17 | | | | 3.92 | | | | 15.25 | | | | 41.26 | | | | (24.61 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.77 | (a) | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.84 | | | | 1.88 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.72 | (a) | | | 1.72 | | | | 1.74 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.84 | | | | 1.88 | |
Net investment income | | | 4.83 | (a) | | | 5.56 | | | | 5.94 | | | | 6.61 | | | | 7.71 | | | | 7.39 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 17 | (n) | | | 38 | | | | 60 | | | | 66 | | | | 58 | | | | 61 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $1,491 | | | | $1,311 | | | | $1,060 | | | | $739 | | | | $462 | | | | $221 | |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(i) | For Class R5, the period is from inception, June 1, 2012, through the stated period end. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(w) | Per share amount was less than $0.01. |
(x) | The net asset values per share and total returns have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
40
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) Business and Organization
MFS High Income Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust III (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions. The fund invests in foreign securities. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment.
In this reporting period, the fund adopted the disclosure provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update 2011-11 (“ASU 2011-11”), Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities along with the related scope clarification provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Update 2013-01 (“ASU 2013-01”) entitled Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2011-11 is intended to enhance disclosures on the offsetting of financial assets and liabilities by requiring entities to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments and transactions that are either offset in the statement of financial position or subject to a Master Netting Agreement or similar arrangement. ASU 2013-01 limits the scope of ASU 2011-11’s disclosure requirements on offsetting to financial assets and financial liabilities related to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities lending and securities borrowing transactions. The disclosures required by ASU 2011-11, to the extent applicable to the fund, have been included in the fund’s Significant Accounting Policies note under the captions for each of the fund’s in-scope financial instruments and transactions.
In June 2013, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-08 Financial Services – Investment Companies (Topic 946) – Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2013-08”) which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. ASU 2013-08 sets forth a methodology for determining whether an entity should be characterized as an investment company and prescribes fair value accounting for an investment company’s non-controlling ownership interest in another investment company. FASB has
41
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
determined that a fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 automatically meets ASU 2013-08’s criteria for an investment company. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2013-08 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Equity securities, including restricted equity securities, are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which they are primarily traded. Equity securities, for which there were no sales reported that day, are generally valued at the last quoted daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which such securities are primarily traded. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Exchange-traded options are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the exchange on which such options are primarily traded. Exchange-traded options for which there were no sales reported that day are generally valued at the last daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the exchange on which such options are primarily traded. Options not traded on an exchange are generally valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Foreign currency options are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of bid and asked prices for the time period interpolated from rates provided by a third-party pricing service for proximate time periods. Swap agreements are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service, which for cleared swaps includes an evaluation of any trading activity at the clearinghouses. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by
42
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as forward foreign currency exchange contracts and swap agreements. The following is a summary of the levels used as of July 31, 2013 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments at Value | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Equity Securities | | | $5,369,170 | | | | $2,465,510 | | | | $397,122 | | | | $8,231,802 | |
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | | | — | | | | 3,315,100 | | | | — | | | | 3,315,100 | |
Municipal Bonds | | | — | | | | 1,520,305 | | | | — | | | | 1,520,305 | |
U.S. Corporate Bonds | | | — | | | | 971,289,583 | | | | — | | | | 971,289,583 | |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | | | — | | | | 2,055,499 | | | | — | | | | 2,055,499 | |
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | | | — | | | | 629,392 | | | | — | | | | 629,392 | |
Foreign Bonds | | | — | | | | 213,993,025 | | | | — | | | | 213,993,025 | |
Floating Rate Loans | | | — | | | | 23,832,605 | | | | — | | | | 23,832,605 | |
Mutual Funds | | | 30,464,902 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 30,464,902 | |
Total Investments | | | $35,834,072 | | | | $1,219,101,019 | | | | $397,122 | | | | $1,255,332,213 | |
| | | | |
Other Financial Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Swap Agreements | | | $— | | | | $1,304,318 | | | | $— | | | | $1,304,318 | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | | — | | | | (477,464 | ) | | | — | | | | (477,464 | ) |
43
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
The following is a reconciliation of level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value. The fund’s policy is to recognize transfers between the levels as of the end of the period. The table presents the activity of level 3 securities held at the beginning and the end of the period.
| | | | |
| | Equity Securities | |
Balance as of 1/31/13 | | | $362,059 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 35,063 | |
Balance as of 7/31/13 | | | $397,122 | |
The net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments still held as level 3 at July 31, 2013 is $35,063.
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate or currency exposure, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
The derivative instruments used by the fund were purchased options, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
44
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at July 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value (a) | |
Risk | | Derivative Contracts | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | |
Foreign Exchange | | Forward Foreign Currency Exchange | | | $— | | | | $(477,464) | |
Equity | | Purchased Equity Options | | | 454,410 | | | | — | |
Credit | | Credit Default Swaps | | | 1,304,318 | | | | — | |
Total | | | | | $1,758,728 | | | | $(477,464) | |
(a) | The value of purchased options outstanding is included in total investments, at value, within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Risk | | Swap Agreements | | | Foreign Currency | | | Investments (Purchased Options) | |
Foreign Exchange | | | $— | | | | $274,587 | | | | $— | |
Equity | | | — | | | | — | | | | 991,665 | |
Credit | | | 435,485 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total | | | $435,485 | | | | $274,587 | | | | $991,665 | |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Risk | | Swap Agreements | | | Translation of Assets and Liabilities in Foreign Currencies | | | Investments (Purchased Options) | |
Foreign Exchange | | | $— | | | | $(20,779 | ) | | | $— | |
Equity | | | — | | | | — | | | | (98,437 | ) |
Credit | | | 587,679 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total | | | $587,679 | | | | $(20,779 | ) | | | $(98,437 | ) |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain, but not all, over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. Upon an event of default or a termination of the ISDA Master Agreement, the non-defaulting party has the right to close out all transactions traded under such
45
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any.
Collateral and margin requirements differ by type of derivative. Margin requirements are set by the broker or clearing house for cleared derivatives (i.e., futures contracts, cleared swaps, and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, uncleared swap agreements, and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash that has been segregated to cover the fund’s collateral or margin obligations under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported separately in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities pledged as collateral or margin for the same purpose, if any, is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
The fund’s accounting policy with respect to balance sheet offsetting is that, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Purchased Options – The fund purchased call options for a premium. Purchased call options entitle the holder to buy a specified number of shares or units of a particular security, currency or index at a specified price at a specified date or within a specified period of time. Purchasing call options may hedge against an anticipated increase in the dollar cost of securities or currency to be acquired or increase the fund’s exposure to an underlying instrument.
The premium paid is initially recorded as an investment in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. That investment is subsequently marked-to-market daily with the difference between the premium paid and the market value of the purchased option being recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. Premiums paid for purchased call options which have expired are treated as realized losses on investments in the Statement of Operations. Upon the exercise or closing of a purchased call option, the premium paid is added to the cost of the security or financial instrument purchased.
Whether or not the option is exercised, the fund’s maximum risk of loss from purchasing an option is the amount of premium paid. All option contracts involve credit risk if the counterparty to the option contract fails to perform. For over-the-counter options, this risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts – The fund entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. These contracts may be used to hedge the
46
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
fund’s currency risk or for non-hedging purposes. For hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts to deliver or receive foreign currency that the fund will receive from or use in its normal investment activities. The fund may also use contracts to hedge against declines in the value of foreign currency denominated securities due to unfavorable exchange rate movements. For non-hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts with the intent of changing the relative exposure of the fund’s portfolio of securities to different currencies to take advantage of anticipated exchange rate changes.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a receivable or payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts until the contract settlement date. On contract settlement date, any gain or loss on the contract is recorded as realized gains or losses on foreign currency.
Risks may arise upon entering into these contracts from unanticipated movements in the value of the contract and from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Generally, the fund’s maximum risk due to counterparty credit risk is the unrealized gain on the contract due to the use of Continuous Linked Settlement, an industry accepted settlement system. This risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Swap Agreements – During the period the fund entered into swap agreements. Effective June 10, 2013, certain types of swaps (“cleared swaps”) are required to be centrally cleared under provisions of the Dodd-Frank Regulatory Reform Bill. In a cleared swap transaction, the swap agreement is novated to a central counterparty (the “clearinghouse”) immediately following execution of the swap contract with an executing broker. Thereafter, throughout the term of the cleared swap, the fund interfaces indirectly with the clearinghouse through a clearing broker.
A swap agreement is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap agreement, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations. The daily change in valuation of centrally cleared swaps is recorded as a receivable or payable for variation margin in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap agreement are reflected as premiums paid or received in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the
47
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap agreements are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. For uncleared swaps, that risk is further reduced by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement. Although not covered by an ISDA Master Agreement, the fund’s counterparty risk due to cleared swaps is mitigated by the clearinghouses’ margining requirements and financial safeguards in the event of a clearing broker default.
The fund entered into credit default swap agreements in order to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap agreement, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the agreement notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although agreement-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant agreement. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference between the value of the deliverable obligation and the swap agreement’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations.
Credit default swap agreements are considered to have credit-risk-related contingent features since they trigger payment by the protection seller to the protection buyer upon the occurrence of a defined credit event. The maximum amount of future, undiscounted payments that the fund, as protection seller, could be required to make is equal to the swap agreement’s notional amount. The protection seller’s payment obligation would be offset to the extent of the value of the agreement’s deliverable obligation. At July 31, 2013, the fund did not hold any credit default swap agreements at an unrealized loss where it is the protection seller.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the agreement. For uncleared swaps, counterparty risk is reduced by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the
48
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement. For cleared swaps, the fund’s counterparty risk is mitigated by the clearinghouses’ margining requirements and financial safeguards in the event of a clearing broker default.
Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments – The fund invests in loans and loan participations or other receivables. These investments may include standby financing commitments, including revolving credit facilities, which obligate the fund to supply additional cash to the borrower on demand. Loan participations involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other financial intermediary.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fund earns certain fees in connection with its floating rate loan purchasing activities. These fees are in addition to interest payments earned and may include amendment fees, commitment fees, facility fees, consent fees, and prepayment fees. Commitment fees are recorded on an accrual basis as income in the accompanying financial statements. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended July 31, 2013, is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result,
49
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to expiration of capital loss carryforwards and amortization and accretion of debt securities.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
| | | | |
| | 1/31/13 | |
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | | | $73,590,229 | |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
| | | | |
As of 7/31/13 | | | |
Cost of investments | | | $1,235,644,894 | |
Gross appreciation | | | 43,903,491 | |
Gross depreciation | | | (24,216,172 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | $19,687,319 | |
| |
As of 1/31/13 | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | | 4,716,752 | |
Capital loss carryforwards | | | (208,010,349 | ) |
Post-October capital loss deferral | | | (970,143 | ) |
Other temporary differences | | | (6,908,274 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 52,172,085 | |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized for fund fiscal years beginning after January 31, 2011 may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses (“post-enactment losses”). Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses (“pre-enactment losses”). As a transition rule, the Act requires that all post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
50
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
As of January 31, 2013 the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains as follows:
| | | | |
Pre-enactment losses which expire as follows: | |
1/31/14 | | | $(20,014,075 | ) |
1/31/15 | | | (43,048,498 | ) |
1/31/16 | | | (1,964,268 | ) |
1/31/17 | | | (94,687,685 | ) |
1/31/18 | | | (46,635,154 | ) |
Total | | | $(206,349,680 | ) |
|
Post-enactment losses which are characterized as follows: | |
Long-Term | | | $(1,660,669 | ) |
The availability of a portion of the capital loss carryforwards, which were acquired on July 24, 2009 in connection with the MFS Floating Rate High Income Fund merger, may be limited in a given year.
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution, service, and program manager fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B and Class 529B shares will convert to Class A and Class 529A shares, respectively, approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | From net investment income | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Year ended 1/31/13 (i) | |
Class A | | | $14,403,854 | | | | $30,841,571 | |
Class B | | | 819,321 | | | | 1,720,399 | |
Class C | | | 2,081,092 | | | | 4,497,130 | |
Class I | | | 2,134,358 | | | | 15,277,639 | |
Class R1 | | | 30,141 | | | | 72,831 | |
Class R2 | | | 113,530 | | | | 301,935 | |
Class R3 | | | 240,419 | | | | 517,383 | |
Class R4 | | | 13,950 | | | | 24,030 | |
Class R5 | | | 17,657,118 | | | | 20,103,485 | |
Class 529A | | | 87,163 | | | | 141,072 | |
Class 529B | | | 9,486 | | | | 22,515 | |
Class 529C | | | 37,760 | | | | 70,239 | |
Total | | | $37,628,192 | | | | $73,590,229 | |
(i) | For Class R5, the period is from inception, June 1, 2012, through the stated period end. |
51
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(3) Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at the following annual rates:
| | | | |
First $1.4 billion of average daily net assets | | | 0.46 | % |
Average daily net assets in excess of $1.4 billion | | | 0.44 | % |
Effective April 1, 2013, MFS has agreed in writing to reduce its management fee by a specified amount if certain MFS mutual fund assets exceed thresholds agreed to by MFS and the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the period April 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013, this management fee reduction amounted to $2,274, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The management fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.46% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $85,538 and $1,630 for the six months ended July 31, 2013, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A and Class 529A shares of the fund, respectively.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Distribution Fee Rate (d) | | | Service Fee Rate (d) | | | Total Distribution Plan (d) | | | Annual Effective Rate (e) | | | Distribution and Service Fee | |
Class A | | | — | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.24% | | | | $600,784 | |
Class B | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 156,447 | |
Class C | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 396,775 | |
Class R1 | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 5,755 | |
Class R2 | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.50% | | | | 0.50% | | | | 9,874 | |
Class R3 | | | — | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 10,038 | |
Class 529A | | | — | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.23% | | | | 3,669 | |
Class 529B | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1,827 | |
Class 529C | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 7,299 | |
Total Distribution and Service Fees | | | | | | | | | | | | $1,192,468 | |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’s average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. |
52
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended July 31, 2013 based on each class’s average daily net assets. Effective January 1, 2013, MFD has voluntarily agreed to rebate a portion of each class’s 0.25% service fee attributable to accounts for which MFD retains the 0.25% service fee except for accounts attributable to MFS seed money. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, this rebate amounted to $20,806, $287, $302, and $321 for Class A, Class B, Class C, and Class 529A, respectively, and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. |
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 18 months of purchase for shares purchased on or after August 1, 2012, and within 24 months of purchase for shares purchased prior to August 1, 2012. Class C and Class 529C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B and Class 529B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended July 31, 2013, were as follows:
| | | | |
| | Amount | |
Class A | | | $2,244 | |
Class B | | | 15,420 | |
Class C | | | 2,358 | |
Class 529B | | | 61 | |
Class 529C | | | — | |
The fund has entered into and may from time to time enter into contracts with program managers and other parties which administer the tuition programs through which an investment in the fund’s 529 share classes is made. The fund has entered into an agreement with MFD pursuant to which MFD receives an annual fee of up to 0.10% of the average daily net assets attributable to each 529 share class. MFD has agreed to waive a portion of this fee in an amount equal to 0.05% of the average daily net assets for each 529 share class. This waiver agreement will expire on May 31, 2014, unless MFD elects to extend the waiver. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, this waiver amounted to $1,190 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The program manager fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.05% of the average daily net assets attributable to each 529 share class. The services provided by MFD, or a third party with which MFD contracts, include recordkeeping and tax reporting and account services, as well as services designed to maintain the program’s compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and other regulatory requirements. Program manager fees and waivers for the six months ended July 31, 2013, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| �� | Fee | | | Waiver | |
Class 529A | | | $1,467 | | | | $734 | |
Class 529B | | | 183 | | | | 91 | |
Class 529C | | | 730 | | | | 365 | |
Total Program Manager Fees and Waivers | | | $2,380 | | | | $1,190 | |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the
53
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
six months ended July 31, 2013, the fee was $148,348, which equated to 0.0239% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. Class R5 shares do not incur sub-accounting fees . For the six months ended July 31, 2013, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $291,317.
Under a Special Servicing Agreement among MFS, each MFS fund which invests in other MFS funds (“MFS fund-of-funds”) and certain underlying funds in which a MFS fund-of-funds invests (“underlying funds”), each underlying fund may pay a portion of each MFS fund-of-fund’s transfer agent-related expenses, including sub-accounting fees payable to financial intermediaries, to the extent such payments do not exceed the benefits realized or expected to be realized by the underlying fund from the investment in the underlying fund by the MFS fund-of-fund. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, these costs for the fund amounted to $308,440 and are reflected in the “Shareholder servicing costs” in the Statement of Operations.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0133% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. Effective January 1, 2002, accrued benefits under the DB plan for then-current independent Trustees who continued were credited to an unfunded retirement deferral plan (the “Retirement Deferral plan”), which was established for and exists solely with respect to these credited amounts, and is not available for other deferrals by these or other independent Trustees. Although the Retirement Deferral plan is unfunded, amounts deferred under the plan are periodically adjusted for investment experience as if they had been invested in shares of the fund. The DB plan resulted in a pension expense of $1,358 and the Retirement Deferral plan resulted in an expense of $339. Both amounts are included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the six months ended July 31, 2013. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent
54
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Trustees under both plans amounted to $60,582 at July 31, 2013, and is included in “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $4,757 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations . MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $2,298, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” in the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
(4) Portfolio Securities
Purchases and sales of investments, other than purchased option transactions, and short-term obligations, aggregated $301,634,806 and $202,063,587, respectively.
55
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Year ended 1/31/13 (i) | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares sold | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 16,504,991 | | | | $59,281,137 | | | | 37,926,389 | | | | $133,588,887 | |
Class B | | | 1,301,367 | | | | 4,697,204 | | | | 3,678,551 | | | | 12,885,658 | |
Class C | | | 1,576,820 | | | | 5,698,176 | | | | 4,401,599 | | | | 15,527,434 | |
Class I | | | 2,678,949 | | | | 9,595,947 | | | | 23,095,779 | | | | 80,270,101 | |
Class R1 | | | 34,804 | | | | 125,625 | | | | 106,585 | | | | 374,003 | |
Class R2 | | | 110,397 | | | | 397,636 | | | | 219,964 | | | | 772,688 | |
Class R3 | | | 336,044 | | | | 1,213,878 | | | | 432,960 | | | | 1,519,275 | |
Class R4 | | | 50,714 | | | | 182,720 | | | | 18,438 | | | | 63,964 | |
Class R5 | | | 24,444,689 | | | | 87,922,420 | | | | 144,005,941 | | | | 493,707,322 | |
Class 529A | | | 121,362 | | | | 437,607 | | | | 310,590 | | | | 1,096,036 | |
Class 529B | | | 7,170 | | | | 25,942 | | | | 41,923 | | | | 146,659 | |
Class 529C | | | 78,787 | | | | 285,086 | | | | 133,976 | | | | 470,182 | |
| | | 47,246,094 | | | | $169,863,378 | | | | 214,372,695 | | | | $740,422,209 | |
| | | | |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 3,261,524 | | | | $11,710,477 | | | | 6,846,113 | | | | $24,077,229 | |
Class B | | | 192,839 | | | | 693,795 | | | | 372,944 | | | | 1,315,972 | |
Class C | | | 452,161 | | | | 1,630,763 | | | | 948,179 | | | | 3,350,101 | |
Class I | | | 565,980 | | | | 2,030,731 | | | | 3,842,281 | | | | 13,362,376 | |
Class R1 | | | 8,376 | | | | 30,141 | | | | 20,648 | | | | 72,686 | |
Class R2 | | | 31,427 | | | | 112,893 | | | | 83,820 | | | | 294,571 | |
Class R3 | | | 66,957 | | | | 240,413 | | | | 147,100 | | | | 517,296 | |
Class R4 | | | 3,885 | | | | 13,950 | | | | 6,828 | | | | 24,030 | |
Class R5 | | | 4,919,992 | | | | 17,656,953 | | | | 5,665,992 | | | | 20,103,484 | |
Class 529A | | | 24,192 | | | | 86,835 | | | | 39,944 | | | | 140,663 | |
Class 529B | | | 2,613 | | | | 9,382 | | | | 6,334 | | | | 22,255 | |
Class 529C | | | 10,447 | | | | 37,583 | | | | 19,846 | | | | 69,991 | |
| | | 9,540,393 | | | | $34,253,916 | | | | 18,000,029 | | | | $63,350,654 | |
56
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Year ended 1/31/13 (i) | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares reacquired | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (27,717,762 | ) | | | $(99,889,507 | ) | | | (39,425,483 | ) | | | $(138,201,516 | ) |
Class B | | | (1,424,148 | ) | | | (5,125,318 | ) | | | (2,838,499 | ) | | | (9,998,115 | ) |
Class C | | | (3,596,478 | ) | | | (12,949,015 | ) | | | (4,616,000 | ) | | | (16,236,799 | ) |
Class I | | | (4,601,347 | ) | | | (16,522,173 | ) | | | (137,959,990 | ) | | | (471,436,686 | ) |
Class R1 | | | (27,358 | ) | | | (99,299 | ) | | | (161,538 | ) | | | (571,113 | ) |
Class R2 | | | (193,369 | ) | | | (696,215 | ) | | | (807,065 | ) | | | (2,825,243 | ) |
Class R3 | | | (466,567 | ) | | | (1,679,192 | ) | | | (458,687 | ) | | | (1,617,198 | ) |
Class R4 | | | (11,322 | ) | | | (40,516 | ) | | | (37,898 | ) | | | (135,112 | ) |
Class R5 | | | (777,348 | ) | | | (2,804,629 | ) | | | (6,517,906 | ) | | | (22,618,362 | ) |
Class 529A | | | (65,669 | ) | | | (235,584 | ) | | | (88,834 | ) | | | (313,860 | ) |
Class 529B | | | (12,769 | ) | | | (46,308 | ) | | | (49,857 | ) | | | (175,879 | ) |
Class 529C | | | (33,747 | ) | | | (120,823 | ) | | | (98,901 | ) | | | (349,129 | ) |
| | | (38,927,884 | ) | | | $(140,208,579 | ) | | | (193,060,658 | ) | | | $(664,479,012 | ) |
| | | | |
Net change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (7,951,247 | ) | | | $(28,897,893 | ) | | | 5,347,019 | | | | $19,464,600 | |
Class B | | | 70,058 | | | | 265,681 | | | | 1,212,996 | | | | 4,203,515 | |
Class C | | | (1,567,497 | ) | | | (5,620,076 | ) | | | 733,778 | | | | 2,640,736 | |
Class I | | | (1,356,418 | ) | | | (4,895,495 | ) | | | (111,021,930 | ) | | | (377,804,209 | ) |
Class R1 | | | 15,822 | | | | 56,467 | | | | (34,305 | ) | | | (124,424 | ) |
Class R2 | | | (51,545 | ) | | | (185,686 | ) | | | (503,281 | ) | | | (1,757,984 | ) |
Class R3 | | | (63,566 | ) | | | (224,901 | ) | | | 121,373 | | | | 419,373 | |
Class R4 | | | 43,277 | | | | 156,154 | | | | (12,632 | ) | | | (47,118 | ) |
Class R5 | | | 28,587,333 | | | | 102,774,744 | | | | 143,154,027 | | | | 491,192,444 | |
Class 529A | | | 79,885 | | | | 288,858 | | | | 261,700 | | | | 922,839 | |
Class 529B | | | (2,986 | ) | | | (10,984 | ) | | | (1,600 | ) | | | (6,965 | ) |
Class 529C | | | 55,487 | | | | 201,846 | | | | 54,921 | | | | 191,044 | |
| | | 17,858,603 | | | | $63,908,715 | | | | 39,312,066 | | | | $139,293,851 | |
(i) | For Class R5, the period is from inception, June 1, 2012, through the stated period end. |
The fund is one of several mutual funds in which the MFS funds-of-funds may invest. The MFS funds-of-funds do not invest in the underlying MFS funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. At the end of the period, the MFS Moderate Allocation Fund, the MFS Growth Allocation Fund, the MFS Conservative Allocation Fund , and the MFS Lifetime 2020 Fund, were the owners of record of approximately 19%, 16%, 10%, and 1%, respectively, of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund. In addition, the Lifetime Retirement Income Fund, the MFS Lifetime 2010 Fund, the MFS Lifetime 2015 Fund , the MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund , the MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund , and the MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund were each the owners of record of less than 1% of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund.
(6) Line of Credit
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a
57
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $3,106 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations.
(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be an affiliated issuer:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Fund | | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | | | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | | | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | | | Ending Shares/Par Amount | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | 62,312,638 | | | | 185,998,964 | | | | (217,846,700 | ) | | | 30,464,902 | |
| | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Fund | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | | Capital Gain Distributions | | | Dividend Income | | | Ending Value | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | $— | | | | $— | | | | $32,089 | | | | $30,464,902 | |
58
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2013 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2012 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to
59
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 4th quintile for each of the one- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2012 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each lower than the Lipper expense group median.
60
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to any comparable institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund may benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund and/or growth in assets of the MFS Funds as a whole. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is subject to a contractual breakpoint that reduces the Fund’s advisory fee rate on average daily net assets over $1.4 billion. The Trustees also noted that MFS has agreed in writing to waive a portion of the management fees of certain MFS Funds, including the Fund, if the total combined assets of certain funds within the MFS Funds’ complex increase above agreed upon thresholds (the “group fee waiver”), enabling the Fund’s shareholders to share in the benefits from any economies of scale at the complex level. The group fee waiver is reviewed and renewed annually between the Board and MFS. The Trustees concluded that the existing breakpoint and the group fee waiver were sufficient to allow the Fund to benefit from economies of scale as its assets and overall complex assets grow.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS
61
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2013.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
62
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
FURTHER INFORMATION
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.
PROVISION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS AND SUMMARY PROSPECTUSES
The fund produces financial reports every six months and updates its summary prospectus and prospectus annually. To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, only one copy of the fund’s annual and semiannual report and summary prospectus may be mailed to shareholders having the same last name and residential address on the fund’s records. However, any shareholder may contact MFSC (please see back cover for address and telephone number) to request that copies of these reports and summary prospectuses be sent personally to that shareholder.
63
Save paper with eDelivery.
| MFS® will send you prospectuses, |
reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter.
To sign up:
1. Go to mfs.com.
2. Log in via MFS® Access.
3. Select eDelivery.
If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS® Access, or eDelivery may not be available to you.
CONTACT
WEB SITE
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
ACCOUNT SERVICE AND LITERATURE
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Financial advisors
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
MAILING ADDRESS
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
OVERNIGHT MAIL
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
SEMIANNUAL REPORT
July 31, 2013
MFS® HIGH YIELD OPPORTUNITIES FUND
HYO-SEM
MFS® HIGH YIELD OPPORTUNITIES FUND
CONTENTS
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders.
It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholders:
The U.S. economy continues to grow, albeit at a modest pace, possibly helping to gently lift other regions out of a prolonged slump. The resilience of the U.S. housing
market and improved jobs picture continues to offset the drag created by the government’s sequestration and rise in taxes. Going forward, much could hinge on how much cooperation and bipartisanship the U.S. Congress can achieve, as yet another fiscal showdown looms later in 2013.
China is shifting gears from being the engine of global growth because of its rapid consumption of commodities. Commodity-exporting countries are feeling the squeeze from China’s economic focus being turned toward domestic consumers and its overall pace of growth slowing. Japan’s recent economic reports indicate that its 15-year period of stagnant
growth and deflation could be ending, while the eurozone is showing signs of a pickup in economic growth after two years of recession. These recent positive signs in Japan and Europe point to a possible broadening base of global growth that could help take the burden off China and the United States as the main engines of global activity.
As always, managing risk in the face of uncertainty remains a top priority for investors. At MFS®, our uniquely collaborative investment process employs integrated, global research and active risk management. Our global team of investment professionals shares ideas and evaluates opportunities across continents, investment disciplines and asset classes — all with a goal of building better insights, and ultimately better results, for our clients.
We are mindful of the many economic challenges investors face, and believe it is more important than ever to maintain a long-term view and employ time-tested principles, such as asset allocation and diversification. We remain confident that our unique approach can serve investors well as they work with their financial advisors to identify and pursue the most suitable opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
September 16, 2013
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio structure (i)
| | | | |
Top five industries (i) | | | | |
Energy - Independent | | | 6.5% | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services | | | 4.6% | |
Broadcasting | | | 4.4% | |
Telecommunications-Wireless | | | 4.4% | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials | | | 4.0% | |
|
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | |
A | | | 0.2% | |
BBB | | | 7.2% | |
BB | | | 35.7% | |
B | | | 40.9% | |
CCC | | | 11.5% | |
CC (o) | | | 0.0% | |
C | | | 0.1% | |
D | | | 0.1% | |
Not Rated | | | 1.3% | |
Non-Fixed Income | | | 1.3% | |
Cash & Other | | | 1.7% | |
| | | | |
Portfolio facts (i) | | | | |
Average Duration (d) | | | 4.3 | |
Average Effective Maturity (m) | | | 7.0 yrs. | |
|
Issuer country weightings (i)(x) | |
United States | | | 69.6% | |
United Kingdom | | | 3.9% | |
Canada | | | 2.7% | |
Russia | | | 2.6% | |
Luxembourg | | | 2.5% | |
Netherlands | | | 2.0% | |
Brazil | | | 1.9% | |
Mexico | | | 1.6% | |
Ireland | | | 1.1% | |
Other Countries | | | 12.1% | |
2
Portfolio Composition – continued
(a) | For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Non-Fixed Income includes equity securities (including convertible bonds and equity derivatives) and commodities. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
(x) | Represents the portfolio’s exposure to issuer countries as a percentage of a portfolio’s net assets. |
Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio.
The fund invests a portion of its assets in the MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio. Percentages reflect exposure to the underlying holdings of the MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio and not to the exposure from investing directly in the MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio itself.
Percentages are based on net assets as of 7/31/13.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
EXPENSE TABLE
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
February 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
In addition to the fees and expenses which the fund bears directly, the fund indirectly bears a pro rata share of the fees and expenses of the underlying MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio in which the fund invests. The MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio is a mutual fund advised by MFS that does not pay management fees to MFS but does incur investment and operating costs. If these transactional and indirect costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period February 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
4
Expense Table – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | | | Beginning Account Value 2/01/13 | | | Ending Account Value 7/31/13 | | | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 2/01/13-7/31/13 | |
A | | Actual | | | 1.05% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,009.43 | | | | $5.23 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.05% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.59 | | | | $5.26 | |
B | | Actual | | | 1.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,005.69 | | | | $8.95 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.87 | | | | $9.00 | |
C | | Actual | | | 1.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,005.64 | | | | $8.95 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.87 | | | | $9.00 | |
I | | Actual | | | 0.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,009.17 | | | | $3.99 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.83 | | | | $4.01 | |
R1 | | Actual | | | 1.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,005.70 | | | | $8.95 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.87 | | | | $9.00 | |
R2 | | Actual | | | 1.30% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,008.21 | | | | $6.47 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.30% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.35 | | | | $6.51 | |
R3 | | Actual | | | 1.05% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,009.44 | | | | $5.23 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.05% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.59 | | | | $5.26 | |
R4 | | Actual | | | 0.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,010.86 | | | | $3.99 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.83 | | | | $4.01 | |
R5 | | Actual | | | 0.71% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,012.69 | | | | $3.54 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.71% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.27 | | | | $3.56 | |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid are equal to each class’s annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. In addition to the fees and expenses which the fund bears directly, the fund indirectly bears a pro rata share of the investment and operating costs of the MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio in which the fund invests. If these indirect costs were included, your costs would have been higher. |
5
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
7/31/13 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
| | | | | | | | |
Bonds - 17.8% | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Aerospace - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Embraer Empresa Brasileria de Aeronaves, 5.15%, 2022 | | $ | 200,000 | | | $ | 202,000 | |
| | |
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Arbor Realty Mortgage Securities, CDO, FRN, 2.566%, 2038 (z) | | $ | 1,136,457 | | | $ | 340,936 | |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 6.249%, 2051 (z) | | | 3,830,049 | | | | 1,691,591 | |
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.696%, 2017 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 350,000 | |
Crest Ltd., CDO, 7%, 2040 (a)(p) | | | 1,244,845 | | | | 62,241 | |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 11.364%, 2025 (i)(z) | | | 150,206 | | | | 22,530 | |
G-Force LLC, CDO, “A2”, 4.83%, 2036 (z) | | | 319,864 | | | | 320,663 | |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “C”, FRN, 6%, 2051 | | | 1,390,000 | | | | 324,982 | |
LB Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.042%, 2030 (i) | | | 532,188 | | | | 10,310 | |
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.385%, 2039 (i)(z) | | | 1,312,159 | | | | 27,883 | |
Preferred Term Securities XII Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2033 (a)(c)(z) | | | 1,775,000 | | | | 18 | |
Preferred Term Securities XVI Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2035 (a)(c)(z) | | | 3,250,000 | | | | 0 | |
Preferred Term Securities XVII Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2035 (a)(c)(z) | | | 1,813,000 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,151,154 | |
Automotive - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Automotores Gildemeister S.A., 8.25%, 2021 (n) | | $ | 116,000 | | | $ | 92,800 | |
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 8.125%, 2021 (n) | | | 920,000 | | | | 1,018,900 | |
Schaeffler Finance B.V., 4.25%, 2018 (z) | | EUR | 100,000 | | | | 134,231 | |
Schaeffler Finance B.V., 6.875%, 2018 (p)(z) | | $ | 385,000 | | | | 392,700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,638,631 | |
Broadcasting - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., 9%, 2021 | | $ | 744,000 | | | $ | 732,839 | |
LBI Media Holdings, Inc., 11%, 2013 | | | 2,110,000 | | | | 422,000 | |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 (p)(z) | | | 970,072 | | | | 984,622 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,139,461 | |
Building - 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
CEMEX Espana S.A., 9.25%, 2020 | | $ | 995,000 | | | $ | 1,087,038 | |
CEMEX Finance LLC, 9.5%, 2016 | | | 1,215,000 | | | | 1,293,975 | |
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 9%, 2018 (n) | | | 609,000 | | | | 662,288 | |
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 5.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 345,000 | | | | 345,000 | |
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua S.A.B. de C.V., 8.125%, 2020 (n) | | | 795,000 | | | | 822,825 | |
Lafarge S.A., 7.125%, 2036 | | | 625,000 | | | | 653,125 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,864,251 | |
6
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Business Services - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Equinix, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | | $ | 390,000 | | | $ | 386,100 | |
| | |
Cable TV - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
Cogeco Cable, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 (z) | | $ | 380,000 | | | $ | 375,250 | |
Myriad International Holdings B.V., 6%, 2020 (z) | | | 971,000 | | | | 1,002,558 | |
Nara Cable Funding Ltd., 8.875%, 2018 (z) | | | 1,225,000 | | | | 1,286,250 | |
ONO Finance ll PLC, 10.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 550,000 | | | | 572,000 | |
Telenet Finance Luxembourg, 6.375%, 2020 (n) | | EUR | 500,000 | | | | 699,764 | |
Telenet Group Holding N.V., 6.25%, 2022 (z) | | EUR | 780,000 | | | | 1,068,803 | |
UPC Holding B.V., 9.875%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 820,000 | | | | 893,800 | |
Ziggo Bond Co. B.V., 8%, 2018 (n) | | EUR | 755,000 | | | | 1,074,723 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,973,148 | |
Conglomerates - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Metalloinvest Finance Ltd., 5.625%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 820,000 | | | $ | 766,700 | |
Votorantim Participacoes S.A., 6.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 862,000 | | | | 922,340 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,689,040 | |
Construction - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Country Garden Holdings Co., 11.25%, 2017 | | $ | 542,000 | | | $ | 592,840 | |
Empresas ICA S.A.B. de C.V., 8.375%, 2017 | | | 291,000 | | | | 278,051 | |
Empresas ICA S.A.B. de C.V., 8.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 150,000 | | | | 143,325 | |
Empresas ICA Sociedad Controladora S.A. de C.V., 8.9%, 2021 | | | 579,000 | | | | 538,470 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,552,686 | |
Electrical Equipment - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Avaya, Inc., 9.75%, 2015 | | $ | 465,000 | | | $ | 455,700 | |
| | |
Electronics - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Nokia Corp., 5.375%, 2019 | | $ | 600,000 | | | $ | 585,000 | |
| | |
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 3.6% | | | | | | | | |
Banco de Reservas de La Republica Dominicana, 7%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 606,000 | | | $ | 599,940 | |
Banco do Brasil S.A., 3.875%, 2017 | | | 1,362,000 | | | | 1,406,265 | |
Banco do Brasil S.A., 5.875%, 2023 (n) | | | 726,000 | | | | 700,227 | |
Banco do Estado Rio Grande do Sul S.A., 7.375%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,141,000 | | | | 1,153,836 | |
Bank of Ceylon, 6.875%, 2017 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 206,000 | |
Comision Federal de Electricidad, 5.75%, 2042 (n) | | | 1,195,000 | | | | 1,135,250 | |
Dolphin Energy Ltd., 5.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 804,000 | | | | 884,400 | |
Ecopetrol S.A., 7.625%, 2019 | | | 547,000 | | | | 650,930 | |
Gaz Capital S.A., 5.999%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,547,000 | | | | 1,627,258 | |
Instituto Costarricense, 6.375%, 2043 (n) | | | 923,000 | | | | 835,315 | |
JSC Georgian Railway, 7.75%, 2022 (n) | | | 700,000 | | | | 764,750 | |
7
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - continued | | | | | | | | |
Kazakhstan Temir Zholy Co., 6.95%, 2042 (n) | | $ | 1,260,000 | | | $ | 1,285,200 | |
Majapahit Holding B.V., 7.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 723,000 | | | | 797,108 | |
Majapahit Holding B.V., 7.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 654,000 | | | | 729,210 | |
Naftogaz Ukraine, 9.5%, 2014 | | | 1,224,000 | | | | 1,222,470 | |
Pertamina PT, 4.875%, 2022 (n) | | | 255,000 | | | | 242,250 | |
Pertamina PT, 6%, 2042 (n) | | | 297,000 | | | | 256,163 | |
Petrobras International Finance Co., 5.375%, 2021 | | | 521,000 | | | | 518,830 | |
Petrobras International Finance Co., 6.75%, 2041 | | | 245,000 | | | | 236,270 | |
Petroleos de Venezuela S.A., 5.25%, 2017 | | | 2,698,000 | | | | 2,212,360 | |
Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.875%, 2022 | | | 733,000 | | | | 753,158 | |
Petroleos Mexicanos, 6.5%, 2041 | | | 133,000 | | | | 139,916 | |
Rosneft, 3.149%, 2017 (n) | | | 208,000 | | | | 205,660 | |
Rosneft, 4.199%, 2022 (n) | | | 948,000 | | | | 874,530 | |
Sberbank of Russia, 6.125%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,139,000 | | | | 1,210,188 | |
Vnesheconombank, 6.025%, 2022 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 210,000 | |
VTB Capital S.A., 6%, 2017 (n) | | | 717,000 | | | | 751,058 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 21,608,542 | |
Emerging Market Sovereign - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
Dominican Republic, 7.5%, 2021 (n) | | $ | 790,000 | | | $ | 853,200 | |
Dominican Republic, 5.875%, 2024 (n) | | | 111,000 | | | | 107,115 | |
Government of Ukraine, 6.875%, 2015 (n) | | | 240,000 | | | | 233,400 | |
Government of Ukraine, 6.25%, 2016 | | | 732,000 | | | | 686,250 | |
Government of Ukraine, 9.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 199,744 | |
Republic of Argentina, 2.5% to 2019, 3.75% to 2029, 5.25% to 2038 | | | 461,000 | | | | 152,130 | |
Republic of Croatia, 5.5%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,264,000 | | | | 1,251,360 | |
Republic of Guatemala, 5.75%, 2022 (n) | | | 201,000 | | | | 209,040 | |
Republic of Latvia, 5.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 217,290 | |
Republic of Serbia, 7.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 204,540 | |
Republic of Venezuela, 7%, 2018 | | | 824,000 | | | | 694,220 | |
Republic of Venezuela, 12.75%, 2022 | | | 415,000 | | | | 423,300 | |
Republic of Venezuela, 9.25%, 2027 | | | 797,000 | | | | 661,510 | |
Republic of Venezuela, 7%, 2038 | | | 2,047,000 | | | | 1,366,373 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,259,472 | |
Energy - Integrated - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Listrindo Capital B.V., 6.95%, 2019 (n) | | $ | 455,000 | | | $ | 480,025 | |
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 3.416%, 2018 (n) | | | 327,000 | | | | 322,160 | |
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 4.563%, 2023 (n) | | | 503,000 | | | | 470,934 | |
Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., 7.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 916,000 | | | | 984,700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,257,819 | |
8
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Financial Institutions - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
TMK Capital S.A., 6.75%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 1,568,000 | | | $ | 1,522,920 | |
| | |
Food & Beverages - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Ajecorp B.V., 6.5%, 2022 (n) | | $ | 965,000 | | | $ | 986,713 | |
BRF S.A., 4%, 2023 (n) | | | 955,000 | | | | 821,300 | |
Corporacion Lindley S.A., 6.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 56,000 | | | | 61,600 | |
Corporacion Lindley S.A., 4.625%, 2023 (n) | | | 802,000 | | | | 761,900 | |
Marfrig Holding Europe B.V., 9.875%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,354,000 | | | | 1,367,540 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,999,053 | |
Forest & Paper Products - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Fibria Overseas Finance Ltd., 7.5%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 357,000 | | | $ | 390,915 | |
Fibria Overseas Finance Ltd., 7.5%, 2020 | | | 261,000 | | | | 285,795 | |
Fibria Overseas Finance Ltd., 6.75%, 2021 | | | 286,000 | | | | 311,740 | |
Smurfit Kappa Group PLC, 7.75%, 2019 (n) | | EUR | 180,000 | | | | 261,513 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,249,963 | |
Furniture & Appliances - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Arcelik A.S., 5%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 1,000,000 | | | $ | 885,000 | |
| | |
Gaming & Lodging - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Great Canadian Gaming Corp., 6.625%, 2022 (z) | | CAD | 1,375,000 | | | $ | 1,378,882 | |
NCL Corp., 5%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 40,000 | | | | 39,900 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,418,782 | |
Industrial - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Hyva Global B.V., 8.625%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 1,169,000 | | | $ | 1,060,868 | |
| | |
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 2017 | | $ | 1,170,000 | | | $ | 1,212,413 | |
Israel Electric Corp. Ltd., 6.7%, 2017 (n) | | | 819,000 | | | | 874,283 | |
Israel Electric Corp. Ltd., 6.875%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,863,000 | | | | 1,928,205 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,014,901 | |
Machinery & Tools - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Ferreycorp S.A.A., 4.875%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 1,491,000 | | | $ | 1,405,268 | |
| | |
Major Banks - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
RBS Capital Trust II, 6.425% to 2034, FRN to 2049 | | $ | 1,375,000 | | | $ | 1,106,875 | |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC,, 6.99% to 2017, FRN to 2049 (n) | | | 165,000 | | | | 160,050 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,266,925 | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Rural Metro Corp., 10.125%, 2019 (a)(d)(n) | | $ | 1,385,000 | | | $ | 803,300 | |
9
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Metals & Mining - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Southern Copper Corp., 6.75%, 2040 | | $ | 826,000 | | | $ | 790,078 | |
| | |
Oil Services - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Afren PLC, 11.5%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 1,000,000 | | | $ | 1,157,500 | |
Odebrecht Offshore Drilling Finance Ltd., 6.75%, 2022 (z) | | | 1,223,000 | | | | 1,220,554 | |
Qgog Constellation S.A., 6.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 1,263,000 | | | | 1,199,850 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,577,904 | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
Alfa Bank, 7.5%, 2019 (n) | | $ | 1,200,000 | | | $ | 1,257,000 | |
Banco de Credito del Peru, 6.125% to 2022, FRN to 2027 (n) | | | 781,000 | | | | 781,000 | |
Banco de Credito del Peru, FRN, 6.875%, 2026 (n) | | | 42,000 | | | | 43,995 | |
Bancolombia S.A., 5.95%, 2021 | | | 914,000 | | | | 952,845 | |
BBVA Banco Continental S.A., 5%, 2022 (n) | | | 900,000 | | | | 882,000 | |
BBVA Bancomer S.A. de C.V., 6.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 975,000 | | | | 1,026,188 | |
BBVA Bancomer S.A. de C.V., 6.75%, 2022 (n) | | | 157,000 | | | | 166,813 | |
Deutsche Bank Capital Funding Trust, FRN, 5.33%, 2049 | | EUR | 1,175,000 | | | | 1,451,786 | |
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 2019, FRN to 2049 (n) | | | 407,000 | | | | 503,154 | |
Grupo Aval Ltd., 4.75%, 2022 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 189,250 | |
Industrial Senior Trust, 5.5%, 2022 (n) | | | 617,000 | | | | 586,150 | |
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., 3.875%, 2018 | | | 980,000 | | | | 952,801 | |
MMG S.A., 6.75%, 2023 (n) | | | 700,000 | | | | 685,501 | |
Turkiye Garanti Bankasi A.S., 4%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 960,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,438,483 | |
Pharmaceuticals - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Capsugel FinanceCo. SCA, 9.875%, 2019 (n) | | EUR | 544,000 | | | $ | 809,651 | |
| | |
Railroad & Shipping - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Brunswick Rail Finance Ltd., 6.5%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 200,000 | | | $ | 198,000 | |
| | |
Retailers - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Cencosud S.A., 4.875%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 1,000,000 | | | $ | 954,836 | |
| | |
Specialty Chemicals - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
SIBUR Securities Ltd., 3.914%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 1,000,000 | | | $ | 952,500 | |
| | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
Altice Financing S.A., 7.875%, 2019 (n) | | $ | 1,512,000 | | | $ | 1,610,280 | |
Digicel Group Ltd., 8.25%, 2020 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 215,000 | |
Digicel Group Ltd., 6%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,436,000 | | | | 1,407,280 | |
Eileme 2 AB, 11.625%, 2020 (n) | | | 796,000 | | | | 931,320 | |
Millicom International Cellular S.A., 4.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 768,000 | | | | 744,960 | |
10
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - continued | | | | | | | | |
MTS International Funding Ltd., 5%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 1,538,000 | | | $ | 1,438,338 | |
VimpelCom Ltd., 5.95%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 930,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,277,178 | |
Transportation - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Far Eastern Shipping Co., 8%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 1,374,000 | | | $ | 1,291,560 | |
Far Eastern Shipping Co., 8.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 947,000 | | | | 890,180 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,181,740 | |
Transportation - Services - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Aguila American Resources Ltd., 7.875%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 1,210,000 | | | $ | 1,252,350 | |
Navios South American Logistics, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 | | | 311,000 | | | | 335,103 | |
Navios South American Logistics, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 286,000 | | | | 308,165 | |
Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Ltd., 8.875%, 2021 (n) | | | 132,000 | | | | 134,640 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,030,258 | |
Utilities - Electric Power - 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
EDP Finance B.V., 6%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 1,310,000 | | | $ | 1,358,182 | |
Empresa de Energia de Bogota S.A., 6.125%, 2021 (n) | | | 950,000 | | | | 1,009,375 | |
InterGen N.V., 7%, 2023 (z) | | | 500,000 | | | | 498,750 | |
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC, 11.5%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,060,000 | | | | 795,000 | |
Viridian Group FundCo II, Ltd., 11.125%, 2017 (z) | | | 1,006,000 | | | | 1,061,330 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,722,637 | |
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $118,535,540) | | | | | | $ | 106,323,249 | |
| | |
Common Stocks - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Printing & Publishing - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
American Media Operations, Inc. (Identified Cost, $1,001,968) (a) | | | 70,215 | | | $ | 365,820 | |
| | |
Underlying Affiliated Funds - 79.5% | | | | | | | | |
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio (Identified Cost, $469,145,326) (v)(y) | | | 48,397,763 | | | $ | 475,266,029 | |
| | |
Money Market Funds - 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.08%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | | | 14,841,774 | | | $ | 14,841,774 | |
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $603,524,608) | | | | | | $ | 596,796,872 | |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 0.2% | | | | | | | 900,732 | |
Net Assets - 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 597,697,604 | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(c) | The rate shown represents a current effective yield, not a coupon rate. |
11
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(d) | In default. Interest and/or scheduled principal payment(s) have been missed. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $68,017,609, representing 11.4% of net assets. |
(p) | Payment-in-kind security. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(y) | An unaudited Portfolio of Investments for MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio as of July 31, 2013 has been included as Appendix A. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Securities | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | | Value | |
Arbor Realty Mortgage Securities, CDO, FRN, 2.566%, 2038 | | 12/20/05 | | | $1,136,454 | | | | $340,936 | |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 6.249%, 2051 | | 6/19/08 | | | 2,879,730 | | | | 1,691,591 | |
Cogeco Cable, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | | 4/18/13 | | | 380,000 | | | | 375,250 | |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 11.364%, 2025 | | 1/29/03 | | | 11,784 | | | | 22,530 | |
G-Force LLC, CDO, “A2”, 4.83%, 2036 | | 1/20/11-2/14/11 | | | 310,969 | | | | 320,663 | |
Great Canadian Gaming Corp., 6.625%, 2022 | | 7/18/12 | | | 1,360,376 | | | | 1,378,882 | |
InterGen N.V., 7%, 2023 | | 6/7/13 | | | 491,236 | | | | 498,750 | |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 | | 11/13/07-2/16/11 | | | 962,151 | | | | 984,622 | |
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.385%, 2039 | | 7/20/04 | | | 25,253 | | | | 27,883 | |
Myriad International Holdings B.V., 6%, 2020 | | 7/11/13 | | | 971,000 | | | | 1,002,558 | |
Nara Cable Funding Ltd., 8.875%, 2018 | | 1/26/12 | | | 1,193,760 | | | | 1,286,250 | |
Odebrecht Offshore Drilling Finance Ltd., 6.75%, 2022 | | 7/26/13 | | | 1,222,927 | | | | 1,220,554 | |
Preferred Term Securities XII Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2033 | | 1/07/05 | | | 1,376,758 | | | | 18 | |
Preferred Term Securities XVI Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2035 | | 12/08/04-1/25/05 | | | 2,573,173 | | | | 0 | |
Preferred Term Securities XVII Ltd., CDO, 0%, 2035 | | 3/09/05 | | | 1,419,521 | | | | 0 | |
Schaeffler Finance B.V., 4.25%, 2018 | | 4/23/13 | | | 129,995 | | | | 134,231 | |
Schaeffler Finance B.V., 6.875%, 2018 | | 7/18/13 | | | 382,961 | | | | 392,700 | |
Telenet Group Holding N.V., 6.25%, 2022 | | 4/29/13 | | | 1,066,713 | | | | 1,068,803 | |
Viridian Group FundCo II, Ltd., 11.125%, 2017 | | 3/1/12 | | | 980,308 | | | | 1,061,330 | |
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | $11,807,551 | |
% of Net assets | | | | | | | | | 2.0% | |
12
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
FRN | | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | | Public Limited Company |
Abbreviations indicate amounts shown in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. All amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. A list of abbreviations is shown below:
Derivative Contracts at 7/31/13
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 7/31/13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type | | Currency | | Counter- party | | Contracts to Deliver/ Receive | | | Settlement Date Range | | In Exchange For | | | Contracts at Value | | | Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Liability Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SELL | | CAD | | Merrill Lynch International Bank | | | 1,375,000 | | | 10/18/13 | | | $1,303,849 | | | | $1,336,170 | | | | $(32,321 | ) |
SELL | | EUR | | Deutsche Bank AG | | | 2,435,657 | | | 10/18/13-4/25/14 | | | 3,125,745 | | | | 3,241,323 | | | | (115,578 | ) |
SELL | | EUR | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | | 2,335,657 | | | 10/18/13 | | | 2,995,508 | | | | 3,108,120 | | | | (112,612 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $(260,511 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
13
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 7/31/13 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
| | | | |
Assets | | | | |
Investments- | | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $119,537,508) | | | $106,689,069 | |
Underlying affiliated funds, at value (identified cost, $483,987,100) | | | 490,107,803 | |
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $603,524,608) | | | $596,796,872 | |
Cash | | | 606,565 | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $33,060) | | | 19,046 | |
Receivables for | | | | |
Investments sold | | | 3,090,532 | |
Fund shares sold | | | 852,232 | |
Interest and dividends | | | 4,587,211 | |
Receivable from investment adviser | | | 34,016 | |
Other assets | | | 1,511 | |
Total assets | | | $605,987,985 | |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payables for | | | | |
Distributions | | | $563,284 | |
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 260,511 | |
Investments purchased | | | 4,819,074 | |
Fund shares reacquired | | | 2,139,239 | |
Payable to affiliates | | | | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 421,809 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 10,606 | |
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | | | 5,014 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 70,844 | |
Total liabilities | | | $8,290,381 | |
Net assets | | | $597,697,604 | |
Net assets consist of | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | $691,319,758 | |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | | (6,999,482 | ) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (84,328,012 | ) |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (2,294,660 | ) |
Net assets | | | $597,697,604 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | | | 91,934,289 | |
14
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net assets | | | Shares outstanding | | | Net asset value per share (a) | |
Class A | | | $361,636,957 | | | | 55,627,637 | | | | $6.50 | |
Class B | | | 30,026,964 | | | | 4,609,180 | | | | 6.51 | |
Class C | | | 95,146,689 | | | | 14,653,780 | | | | 6.49 | |
Class I | | | 101,002,803 | | | | 15,524,825 | | | | 6.51 | |
Class R1 | | | 223,762 | | | | 34,359 | | | | 6.51 | |
Class R2 | | | 289,382 | | | | 44,418 | | | | 6.51 | |
Class R3 | | | 7,773,134 | | | | 1,195,625 | | | | 6.50 | |
Class R4 | | | 1,290,231 | | | | 197,092 | | | | 6.55 | |
Class R5 | | | 307,682 | | | | 47,373 | | | | 6.49 | |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Class A, for which the maximum offering price per share was $6.82 [100 / 95.25 x $6.50]. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering price of Class A shares is reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Classes I, R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
15
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended 7/31/13 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | | |
Income | | | | |
Interest | | | $8,922,275 | |
Dividends | | | 41,785 | |
Dividends from underlying affiliated funds | | | 11,979,006 | |
Total investment income | | | $20,943,066 | |
Expenses | | | | |
Management fee | | | $1,979,799 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 1,154,319 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 397,872 | |
Administrative services fee | | | 43,385 | |
Independent Trustees’ compensation | | | 9,496 | |
Custodian fee | | | 58,768 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 73,167 | |
Audit and tax fees | | | 38,343 | |
Legal fees | | | 4,080 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 91,294 | |
Total expenses | | | $3,850,523 | |
Fees paid indirectly | | | (66 | ) |
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser and/or distributor | | | (261,932 | ) |
Net expenses | | | $3,588,525 | |
Net investment income | | | $17,354,541 | |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | |
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | | | | |
Investments: | | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers | | | $4,731,912 | |
Underlying affiliated funds | | | 11,507,377 | |
Foreign currency | | | 392,055 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | $16,631,344 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | |
Investments | | | $(27,913,738 | ) |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | | 71,722 | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | $(27,842,016 | ) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | $(11,210,672 | ) |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $6,143,869 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
16
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
| | | | | | | | |
Change in net assets | | Six months ended 7/31/13 (unaudited) | | | Year ended 1/31/13 | |
From operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | $17,354,541 | | | | $39,887,285 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 16,631,344 | | | | (6,210,559 | ) |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | (27,842,016 | ) | | | 39,665,021 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $6,143,869 | | | | $73,341,747 | |
Distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(18,465,525 | ) | | | $(41,248,929 | ) |
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | | �� | $(16,505,906 | ) | | | $(3,589,503 | ) |
Total change in net assets | | | $(28,827,562 | ) | | | $28,503,315 | |
Net assets | | | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | | | 626,525,166 | | | | 598,021,851 | |
At end of period (including accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $2,294,660 and $1,183,676, respectively) | | | $597,697,604 | | | | $626,525,166 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
17
Financial Statements
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class A | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.64 | | | | $6.30 | | | | $6.49 | | | | $5.98 | | | | $4.42 | | | | $6.90 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.19 | | | | $0.42 | | | | $0.44 | | | | $0.47 | | | | $0.49 | | | | $0.57 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.13 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | 0.51 | | | | 1.59 | | | | (2.46 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.06 | | | | $0.77 | | | | $0.26 | | | | $0.98 | | | | $2.08 | | | | $(1.89 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.20 | ) | | | $(0.43 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.51 | ) | | | $(0.59 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.20 | ) | | | $(0.43 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.52 | ) | | | $(0.59 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.50 | | | | $6.64 | | | | $6.30 | | | | $6.49 | | | | $5.98 | | | | $4.42 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 0.94 | (n) | | | 12.73 | | | | 4.21 | | | | 17.06 | | | | 49.74 | | | | (28.79 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.14 | (a) | | | 1.14 | | | | 1.13 | | | | 1.13 | | | | 1.16 | | | | 1.24 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.05 | (a) | | | 1.05 | | | | 1.05 | | | | 1.02 | | | | 0.93 | | | | 0.85 | |
Net investment income | | | 5.83 | (a) | | | 6.54 | | | | 6.96 | | | | 7.64 | | | | 9.36 | | | | 9.54 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 23 | (n) | | | 48 | | | | 61 | | | | 68 | | | | 61 | | | | 72 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $361,637 | | | | $412,834 | | | | $422,926 | | | | $474,643 | | | | $369,073 | | | | $276,917 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
18
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class B | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.65 | | | | $6.32 | | | | $6.51 | | | | $5.99 | | | | $4.43 | | | | $6.92 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.17 | | | | $0.37 | | | | $0.39 | | | | $0.43 | | | | $0.45 | | | | $0.53 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.13 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | 0.52 | | | | 1.59 | | | | (2.47 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.04 | | | | $0.72 | | | | $0.21 | | | | $0.95 | | | | $2.04 | | | | $(1.94 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.18 | ) | | | $(0.39 | ) | | | $(0.40 | ) | | | $(0.43 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.55 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.18 | ) | | | $(0.39 | ) | | | $(0.40 | ) | | | $(0.43 | ) | | | $(0.48 | ) | | | $(0.55 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.51 | | | | $6.65 | | | | $6.32 | | | | $6.51 | | | | $5.99 | | | | $4.43 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 0.57 | (n) | | | 11.71 | | | | 3.44 | | | | 16.37 | | | | 48.59 | | | | (29.31 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.88 | (a) | | | 1.89 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 1.90 | | | | 1.89 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.80 | (a) | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.50 | |
Net investment income | | | 5.07 | (a) | | | 5.77 | | | | 6.21 | | | | 6.92 | | | | 8.64 | | | | 8.82 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 23 | (n) | | | 48 | | | | 61 | | | | 68 | | | | 61 | | | | 72 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $30,027 | | | | $33,338 | | | | $35,751 | | | | $46,297 | | | | $51,506 | | | | $42,757 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
19
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class C | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.63 | | | | $6.30 | | | | $6.48 | | | | $5.97 | | | | $4.41 | | | | $6.89 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.17 | | | | $0.37 | | | | $0.40 | | | | $0.43 | | | | $0.45 | | | | $0.53 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.13 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | 0.50 | | | | 1.59 | | | | (2.46 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.04 | | | | $0.72 | | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.93 | | | | $2.04 | | | | $(1.93 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.18 | ) | | | $(0.39 | ) | | | $(0.40 | ) | | | $(0.42 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.55 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.18 | ) | | | $(0.39 | ) | | | $(0.40 | ) | | | $(0.42 | ) | | | $(0.48 | ) | | | $(0.55 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.49 | | | | $6.63 | | | | $6.30 | | | | $6.48 | | | | $5.97 | | | | $4.41 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 0.56 | (n) | | | 11.73 | | | | 3.59 | | | | 16.22 | | | | 48.77 | | | | (29.32 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.89 | (a) | | | 1.89 | | | | 1.89 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 1.90 | | | | 1.90 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.80 | (a) | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.50 | |
Net investment income | | | 5.09 | (a) | | | 5.79 | | | | 6.25 | | | | 6.94 | | | | 8.52 | | | | 8.94 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 23 | (n) | | | 48 | | | | 61 | | | | 68 | | | | 61 | | | | 72 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $95,147 | | | | $99,786 | | | | $89,483 | | | | $96,519 | | | | $89,930 | | | | $55,001 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
20
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class I | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.65 | | | | $6.31 | | | | $6.50 | | | | $5.99 | | | | $4.43 | | | | $6.92 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.44 | | | | $0.46 | | | | $0.48 | | | | $0.50 | | | | $0.60 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.13 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | 0.52 | | | | 1.60 | | | | (2.48 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.07 | | | | $0.79 | | | | $0.28 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $2.10 | | | | $(1.88 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.49 | ) | | | $(0.53 | ) | | | $(0.61 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.00 | )(w) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.49 | ) | | | $(0.54 | ) | | | $(0.61 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.51 | | | | $6.65 | | | | $6.31 | | | | $6.50 | | | | $5.99 | | | | $4.43 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 1.07 | (n) | | | 13.00 | | | | 4.47 | | | | 17.33 | | | | 50.02 | | | | (28.57 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 0.88 | (a) | | | 0.89 | | | | 0.88 | | | | 0.87 | | | | 0.90 | | | | 0.89 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 0.80 | (a) | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.78 | | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.50 | |
Net investment income | | | 6.04 | (a) | | | 6.74 | | | | 7.21 | | | | 7.76 | | | | 9.45 | | | | 9.81 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 23 | (n) | | | 48 | | | | 61 | | | | 68 | | | | 61 | | | | 72 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $101,003 | | | | $70,977 | | | | $38,143 | | | | $38,266 | | | | $20,317 | | | | $11,581 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
21
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R1 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 (i) | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.65 | | | | $6.32 | | | | $6.51 | | | | $5.99 | | | | $4.43 | | | | $6.94 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.17 | | | | $0.37 | | | | $0.39 | | | | $0.43 | | | | $0.45 | | | | $0.35 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.13 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | 0.51 | | | | 1.59 | | | | (2.48 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.04 | | | | $0.72 | | | | $0.21 | | | | $0.94 | | | | $2.04 | | | | $(2.13 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.18 | ) | | | $(0.39 | ) | | | $(0.40 | ) | | | $(0.42 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.38 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.18 | ) | | | $(0.39 | ) | | | $(0.40 | ) | | | $(0.42 | ) | | | $(0.48 | ) | | | $(0.38 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.51 | | | | $6.65 | | | | $6.32 | | | | $6.51 | | | | $5.99 | | | | $4.43 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 0.57 | (n) | | | 11.71 | | | | 3.44 | | | | 16.36 | | | | 48.59 | | | | (31.30 | )(n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.88 | (a) | | | 1.89 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 1.90 | | | | 1.92 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.80 | (a) | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.50 | (a) |
Net investment income | | | 5.06 | (a) | | | 5.70 | | | | 6.22 | | | | 6.90 | | | | 8.53 | | | | 9.60 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 23 | (n) | | | 48 | | | | 61 | | | | 68 | | | | 61 | | | | 72 | (n) |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $224 | | | | $207 | | | | $132 | | | | $126 | | | | $107 | | | | $71 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
22
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R2 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 (i) | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.65 | | | | $6.32 | | | | $6.51 | | | | $5.99 | | | | $4.43 | | | | $6.94 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.18 | | | | $0.40 | | | | $0.43 | | | | $0.46 | | | | $0.47 | | | | $0.37 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.12 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | 0.52 | | | | 1.60 | | | | (2.48 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.06 | | | | $0.75 | | | | $0.25 | | | | $0.98 | | | | $2.07 | | | | $(2.11 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.20 | ) | | | $(0.42 | ) | | | $(0.44 | ) | | | $(0.46 | ) | | | $(0.50 | ) | | | $(0.40 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.20 | ) | | | $(0.42 | ) | | | $(0.44 | ) | | | $(0.46 | ) | | | $(0.51 | ) | | | $(0.40 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.51 | | | | $6.65 | | | | $6.32 | | | | $6.51 | | | | $5.99 | | | | $4.43 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 0.82 | (n) | | | 12.26 | | | | 3.96 | | | | 16.94 | | | | 49.30 | | | | (31.05 | )(n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.38 | (a) | | | 1.39 | | | | 1.38 | | | | 1.37 | | | | 1.40 | | | | 1.42 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.30 | (a) | | | 1.30 | | | | 1.30 | | | | 1.27 | | | | 1.18 | | | | 1.00 | (a) |
Net investment income | | | 5.55 | (a) | | | 6.22 | | | | 6.72 | | | | 7.37 | | | | 9.03 | | | | 10.11 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 23 | (n) | | | 48 | | | | 61 | | | | 68 | | | | 61 | | | | 72 | (n) |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $289 | | | | $253 | | | | $172 | | | | $162 | | | | $114 | | | | $69 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R3 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 (i) | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.64 | | | | $6.31 | | | | $6.49 | | | | $5.98 | | | | $4.42 | | | | $6.92 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.19 | | | | $0.40 | | | | $0.44 | | | | $0.47 | | | | $0.49 | | | | $0.34 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.13 | ) | | | 0.36 | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | 0.51 | | | | 1.59 | | | | (2.43 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.06 | | | | $0.76 | | | | $0.27 | | | | $0.98 | | | | $2.08 | | | | $(2.09 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.20 | ) | | | $(0.43 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.51 | ) | | | $(0.41 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.20 | ) | | | $(0.43 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.52 | ) | | | $(0.41 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.50 | | | | $6.64 | | | | $6.31 | | | | $6.49 | | | | $5.98 | | | | $4.42 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 0.94 | (n) | | | 12.55 | | | | 4.37 | | | | 17.06 | | | | 49.75 | | | | (30.90 | )(n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.13 | (a) | | | 1.12 | | | | 1.14 | | | | 1.13 | | | | 1.17 | | | | 1.17 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.05 | (a) | | | 1.05 | | | | 1.05 | | | | 1.03 | | | | 0.92 | | | | 0.74 | (a) |
Net investment income | | | 5.82 | (a) | | | 6.06 | | | | 7.00 | | | | 7.60 | | | | 9.91 | | | | 10.25 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 23 | (n) | | | 48 | | | | 61 | | | | 68 | | | | 61 | | | | 72 | (n) |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $7,773 | | | | $7,588 | | | | $771 | | | | $560 | | | | $352 | | | | $587 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R4 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 (i) | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.69 | | | | $6.30 | | | | $6.49 | | | | $5.98 | | | | $4.42 | | | | $6.92 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.45 | | | | $0.46 | | | | $0.47 | | | | $0.50 | | | | $0.39 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.13 | ) | | | 0.39 | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | 0.53 | | | | 1.59 | | | | (2.47 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.07 | | | | $0.84 | | | | $0.28 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $2.09 | | | | $(2.08 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.49 | ) | | | $(0.52 | ) | | | $(0.42 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) | | | $(0.47 | ) | | | $(0.49 | ) | | | $(0.53 | ) | | | $(0.42 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.55 | | | | $6.69 | | | | $6.30 | | | | $6.49 | | | | $5.98 | | | | $4.42 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 1.09 | (n) | | | 13.85 | | | | 4.47 | | | | 17.35 | | | | 50.11 | | | | (30.77 | )(n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 0.88 | (a) | | | 0.89 | | | | 0.89 | | | | 0.85 | | | | 0.90 | | | | 0.92 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 0.80 | (a) | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.79 | | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.50 | (a) |
Net investment income | | | 6.04 | (a) | | | 6.98 | | | | 7.25 | | | | 7.40 | | | | 9.49 | | | | 10.64 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 23 | (n) | | | 48 | | | | 61 | | | | 68 | | | | 61 | | | | 72 | (n) |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $1,290 | | | | $1,431 | | | | $3,014 | | | | $3,040 | | | | $122 | | | | $69 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class R5 (y) | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 (i) | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.63 | | | | $6.29 | | | | $6.49 | | | | $5.97 | | | | $4.42 | | | | $6.92 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.44 | | | | $0.45 | | | | $0.47 | | | | $0.48 | | | | $0.38 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.13 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.19 | ) | | | 0.53 | | | | 1.60 | | | | (2.47 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.07 | | | | $0.79 | | | | $0.26 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $2.08 | | | | $(2.09 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) | | | $(0.46 | ) | | | $(0.48 | ) | | | $(0.52 | ) | | | $(0.41 | ) |
From tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | |
Total distributions declared to shareholders | | | $(0.21 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) | | | $(0.46 | ) | | | $(0.48 | ) | | | $(0.53 | ) | | | $(0.41 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.49 | | | | $6.63 | | | | $6.29 | | | | $6.49 | | | | $5.97 | | | | $4.42 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 1.11 | (n) | | | 13.03 | | | | 4.20 | | | | 17.43 | | | | 49.72 | | | | (30.82 | )(n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 0.79 | (a) | | | 0.97 | | | | 0.99 | | | | 0.95 | | | | 0.98 | | | | 1.02 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 0.71 | (a) | | | 0.90 | | | | 0.90 | | | | 0.88 | | | | 0.78 | | | | 0.59 | (a) |
Net investment income | | | 6.10 | (a) | | | 6.89 | | | | 7.14 | | | | 7.45 | | | | 9.02 | | | | 10.81 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 23 | (n) | | | 48 | | | | 61 | | | | 68 | | | | 61 | | | | 72 | (n) |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $308 | | | | $112 | | | | $7,631 | | | | $1,734 | | | | $364 | | | | $129 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Financial Highlights – continued
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(h) | For the six months ended July 31, 2013, in addition to the fees and expenses which the fund bears directly, the fund indirectly bears a pro rata share of the fees and expenses of the underlying affiliated funds in which the fund invests. Accordingly, the expense ratio for the fund reflects only those fees and expenses borne directly by the fund. Because the underlying affiliated funds have varied expense and fee levels and the fund may own different proportions of the underlying affiliated funds at different times, the amount of fees and expenses incurred indirectly by the fund will vary. |
(i) | For the period from the class’ inception, June 2, 2008 (Classes R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) through the stated period end. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(w) | Per share amount was less than $0.01. |
(x) | The net asset values per share and total returns have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. |
(y) | As further discussed in Note 5 in the Notes to Financial Statements, on May 10, 2012, sales of Class W shares (including exchanges) were suspended. On May 11, 2012, certain Class W shares were automatically converted to Class I shares. Shareholders of certain Class W shares became shareholders of Class I and received Class I shares with a total net asset value equal to their Class W shares at the time of the conversion. On May 30, 2012, remaining Class W shares, which represented MFS seed money, were redesignated Class R5. Class R5 shares are generally available only to certain eligible retirement plans and to funds distributed by MFD. Class R5 shares do not pay a 12b-1 distribution fee or sub-accounting costs. On June 1, 2012, Class R5 shares were offered for sale to the public. For further information about the fund’s fee arrangements, please see Note 3 in the Notes to Financial Statements. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) Business and Organization
MFS High Yield Opportunities Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust III (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. As of July 31, 2013, 79.5% of the fund’s net assets was invested in the MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio (“Pooled Portfolio”). The Pooled Portfolio’s investment objective is to seek total return with an emphasis on high current income, but also considering capital appreciation. The accounting policies of the Pooled Portfolio are outlined in its shareholder reports, which are available without charge by calling 1-800-225-2606, at mfs.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) web site at http://www.sec.gov or at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. The Pooled Portfolio’s shareholder reports are not covered by this report. An unaudited Portfolio of Investments for the Pooled Portfolio as of July 31, 2013 has been included as Appendix A. The fund and the Pooled Portfolio invest in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions. The fund and the Pooled Portfolio invest in foreign securities. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment.
In this reporting period, the fund adopted the disclosure provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update 2011-11 (“ASU 2011-11”), Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities along with the related scope clarification provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Update 2013-01 (“ASU 2013-01”) entitled Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2011-11 is intended to enhance disclosures on the offsetting of financial assets and liabilities by requiring entities to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments and transactions that are either offset in the statement of financial position or subject to a Master Netting Agreement or similar arrangement. ASU 2013-01 limits the scope of ASU 2011-11’s disclosure requirements on offsetting to financial assets and financial liabilities related to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities lending and securities borrowing transactions. The
28
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
disclosures required by ASU 2011-11, to the extent applicable to the fund, have been included in the fund’s Significant Accounting Policies note under the captions for each of the fund’s in-scope financial instruments and transactions.
In June 2013, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-08 Financial Services – Investment Companies (Topic 946) – Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2013-08”) which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. ASU 2013-08 sets forth a methodology for determining whether an entity should be characterized as an investment company and prescribes fair value accounting for an investment company’s non-controlling ownership interest in another investment company. FASB has determined that a fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 automatically meets ASU 2013-08’s criteria for an investment company. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2013-08 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
Investment Valuations – The investments of the fund and the Pooled Portfolio are valued as described below.
Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Equity securities, including restricted equity securities, are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which they are primarily traded. Equity securities, for which there were no sales reported that day, are generally valued at the last quoted daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which such securities are primarily traded. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of bid and asked prices for the time period interpolated from rates provided by a third-party pricing service for proximate time periods. Exchange-traded options are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the exchange on which such options are primarily traded. Exchange-traded options for which there were no sales reported that day are generally valued at the last daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the exchange on which such options are primarily traded. Options not traded on an exchange are generally valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Foreign currency options are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Swap agreements are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service, which for cleared swaps includes an evaluation of any trading activity at the clearinghouses. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values
29
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not
30
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
reflected in total investments, such as forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The following is a summary of the levels used as of July 31, 2013 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments at Value | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Equity Securities | | | $— | | | | $— | | | | $365,820 | | | | $365,820 | |
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | | | — | | | | 32,882,912 | | | | — | | | | 32,882,912 | |
U.S. Corporate Bonds | | | — | | | | 6,880,900 | | | | — | | | | 6,880,900 | |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | | | — | | | | 2,427,297 | | | | — | | | | 2,427,297 | |
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | | | — | | | | 723,861 | | | | — | | | | 723,861 | |
Foreign Bonds | | | — | | | | 63,408,279 | | | | — | | | | 63,408,279 | |
Mutual Funds | | | 490,107,803 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 490,107,803 | |
Total Investments | | | $490,107,803 | | | | $106,323,249 | | | | $365,820 | | | | $596,796,872 | |
| | | | |
Other Financial Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | | $— | | | | $(260,511 | ) | | | $— | | | | $(260,511 | ) |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
The following is a reconciliation of level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value. The fund’s policy is to recognize transfers between the levels as of the end of the period. The table presents the activity of level 3 securities held at the beginning and the end of the period.
| | | | |
| | Equity Securities | |
Balance as of 1/31/13 | | | $333,521 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 32,299 | |
Balance as of 7/31/13 | | | $365,820 | |
The net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments still held as level 3 at July 31, 2013 is $32,299.
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate or currency exposure, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging
31
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
The derivative instruments used by the fund were purchased options and forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at July 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value | |
Risk | | Derivative Contracts | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | |
Foreign Exchange | | Forward Foreign Currency Exchange | | | $— | | | | $(260,511) | |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | |
Risk | | Foreign Currency | | | Investments (Purchased Options) | |
Foreign Exchange | | | $233,807 | | | | $— | |
Equity | | | — | | | | 143,766 | |
Total | | | $233,807 | | | | $143,766 | |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | |
Risk | | Translation of Assets and Liabilities in Foreign Currencies | | | Investments (Purchased Options) | |
Foreign Exchange | | | $78,663 | | | | $— | |
Equity | | | — | | | | (80,228 | ) |
Total | | | $78,663 | | | | $(80,228 | ) |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain, but not all, over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the
32
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
credit quality of the other party. Upon an event of default or a termination of the ISDA Master Agreement, the non-defaulting party has the right to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any.
Collateral and margin requirements differ by type of derivative. Margin requirements are set by the broker or clearing house for cleared derivatives (i.e., futures contracts, cleared swaps, and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, uncleared swap agreements, and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash that has been segregated to cover the fund’s collateral or margin obligations under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported separately in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities pledged as collateral or margin for the same purpose, if any, is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
The fund’s accounting policy with respect to balance sheet offsetting is that, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Purchased Options – The fund purchased call and put options for a premium. Purchased call and put options entitle the holder to buy and sell a specified number of shares or units of a particular security, currency or index at a specified price at a specified date or within a specified period of time. Purchasing call options may hedge against an anticipated increase in the dollar cost of securities or currency to be acquired or increase the fund’s exposure to an underlying instrument. Purchasing put options may hedge against an anticipated decline in the value of portfolio securities or currency or decrease the fund’s exposure to an underlying instrument.
The premium paid is initially recorded as an investment in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. That investment is subsequently marked-to-market daily with the difference between the premium paid and the market value of the purchased option being recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. Premiums paid for purchased call and put options which have expired are treated as realized losses on investments in the Statement of Operations. Upon the exercise or closing of a purchased call option, the premium paid is added to the cost of the security or financial instrument purchased. Upon the exercise or closing of a purchased put option, the premium paid is offset against the proceeds on the sale of the underlying security or financial instrument in order to determine the realized gain or loss on investments.
Whether or not the option is exercised, the fund’s maximum risk of loss from purchasing an option is the amount of premium paid. All option contracts involve credit risk if the counterparty to the option contract fails to perform. For
33
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
over-the-counter options, this risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts – The fund entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. These contracts may be used to hedge the fund’s currency risk or for non-hedging purposes. For hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts to deliver or receive foreign currency that the fund will receive from or use in its normal investment activities. The fund may also use contracts to hedge against declines in the value of foreign currency denominated securities due to unfavorable exchange rate movements. For non-hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts with the intent of changing the relative exposure of the fund’s portfolio of securities to different currencies to take advantage of anticipated exchange rate changes.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a receivable or payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts until the contract settlement date. On contract settlement date, any gain or loss on the contract is recorded as realized gains or losses on foreign currency.
Risks may arise upon entering into these contracts from unanticipated movements in the value of the contract and from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Generally, the fund’s maximum risk due to counterparty credit risk is the unrealized gain on the contract due to the use of Continuous Linked Settlement, an industry accepted settlement system. This risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Distributions of income and capital gains from the Pooled Portfolio are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an
34
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.
The fund and/or the Pooled Portfolio may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended July 31, 2013, is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period. Foreign taxes have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements in accordance with the applicable foreign tax law.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
| | | | |
| | 1/31/13 | |
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | | | $41,248,929 | |
35
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
| | | | |
As of 7/31/13 | | | |
Cost of investments | | | $603,572,343 | |
Gross appreciation | | | 9,281,669 | |
Gross depreciation | | | (16,057,140 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | $(6,775,471 | ) |
| |
As of 1/31/13 | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | | 1,922,038 | |
Capital loss carryforwards | | | (96,100,066 | ) |
Post-October capital loss deferral | | | (899,856 | ) |
Other temporary differences | | | (3,529,410 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 17,306,796 | |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized for fund fiscal years beginning after January 31, 2011 may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses (“post-enactment losses”). Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses (“pre-enactment losses”). As a transition rule, the Act requires that all post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
As of January 31, 2013, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains as follows:
| | | | |
Pre-enactment losses which expire as follows: | |
1/31/17 | | | $(39,675,228 | ) |
1/31/18 | | | (45,531,096 | ) |
Total | | | $(85,206,324 | ) |
|
Post-enactment losses which are characterized as follows: | |
Long-Term | | | $(10,893,742 | ) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution and service fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B shares will convert to Class A
36
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
shares approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | From net investment income | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Year ended 1/31/13 | |
Class A | | | $12,232,386 | | | | $28,978,403 | |
Class B | | | 862,199 | | | | 2,078,840 | |
Class C | | | 2,668,840 | | | | 5,704,050 | |
Class I | | | 2,399,478 | | | | 4,082,792 | |
Class R1 | | | 5,695 | | | | 9,356 | |
Class R2 | | | 8,268 | | | | 12,967 | |
Class R3 | | | 240,935 | | | | 96,121 | |
Class R4 | | | 41,454 | | | | 121,208 | |
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | | | 6,270 | | | | 165,192 | |
Total | | | $18,465,525 | | | | $41,248,929 | |
On May 30, 2012, Class W shares were redesignated Class R5. See Note 5 for additional information.
(3) Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.65% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Effective April 1, 2013, MFS has agreed in writing to reduce its management fee by a specified amount if certain MFS mutual fund assets exceed thresholds agreed to by MFS and the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the period April 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013, this management fee reduction amounted to $1,100, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The management fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.65% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Effective August 1, 2013, the investment adviser has agreed in writing to reduce its management fee to 0.60% of average daily net assets in excess of $1.5 billion to $2.5 billion and 0.55% of average daily net assets in excess of $2.5 billion. This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until May 31, 2015.
The investment adviser has agreed in writing to pay a portion of the fund’s total annual operating expenses, exclusive of interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs, and investment-related expenses (including fees and expenses associated with investments in investment companies and other similar investment vehicles) such that total fund operating expenses do not exceed the following rates annually of each class’s average daily net assets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Classes |
A | | B | | C | | I | | R1 | | R2 | | R3 | | R4 | | R5 |
1.05% | | 1.80% | | 1.80% | | 0.80% | | 1.80% | | 1.30% | | 1.05% | | 0.80% | | 0.73% |
37
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until May 31, 2015. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, this reduction amounted to $256,916 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $81,208 for the six months ended July 31, 2013, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the fund.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Distribution Fee Rate (d) | | | Service Fee Rate (d) | | | Total Distribution Plan (d) | | | Annual Effective Rate (e) | | | Distribution and Service Fee | |
Class A | | | — | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | $493,398 | |
Class B | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 158,516 | |
Class C | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 490,915 | |
Class R1 | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1,051 | |
Class R2 | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.50% | | | | 0.50% | | | | 698 | |
Class R3 | | | — | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 9,741 | |
Total Distribution and Service Fees | | | | | | | | | | | | $1,154,319 | |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’s average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended July 31, 2013 based on each class’s average daily net assets. Effective January 1, 2013, MFD has voluntarily agreed to rebate a portion of each class’s 0.25% service fee attributable to accounts for which MFD retains the 0.25% service fee except for accounts attributable to MFS seed money. For the period ended July 31, 2013, this rebate amounted to $2,295, $73, and $408 for Class A, Class B, and Class C, respectively, and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. |
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 18 months of purchase for shares purchased on or after August 1, 2012, and within 24 months of purchase for shares purchased prior to August 1, 2012. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a
38
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended July 31, 2013, were as follows:
| | | | |
| | Amount | |
Class A | | | $10,969 | |
Class B | | | 28,128 | |
Class C | | | 5,300 | |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the fee was $66,057, which equated to 0.0217% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. Class R5 shares do not incur sub-accounting fees. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $331,815.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0142% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. Effective January 1, 2002, accrued benefits under the DB plan for then-current independent Trustees who continued were credited to an unfunded retirement deferral plan (the “Retirement Deferral plan”), which was established for and exists solely with respect to these credited amounts, and is not available for other deferrals by these or other independent Trustees. Although the Retirement Deferral plan is unfunded, amounts deferred under the plan are periodically adjusted for investment experience as if they had been invested in shares of the fund. The Retirement Deferral plan resulted in an expense of $24 and is included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the
39
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
six months ended July 31, 2013. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under the Retirement Deferral plan amounted to $5,009 at July 31, 2013, and is included in “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $2,429 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $1,140, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” in the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
The fund invests in the MFS Pooled Portfolio, which is a mutual fund advised by MFS that does not pay management fees to MFS but does incur investment and operating costs. MFS pooled portfolios are designed to be used by MFS funds to invest in a particular security type rather than invest in the security type directly. The fund invests in the Pooled Portfolio to gain exposure to high income debt instruments, rather than investing in high income debt instruments directly (see Appendix A).
At close of business on March 22, 2013, the fund and certain other MFS funds transferred high income debt instruments, accrued interest and cash to the Pooled Portfolio in exchange for shares of the Pooled Portfolio. The purpose of the transaction was to pool the portion of the assets of the fund and certain other MFS funds invested in high income debt instruments in the Pooled Portfolio. The transfer was accomplished by a tax-free exchange by the fund of investments valued at approximately $516,450,760 with a cost basis of approximately $492,368,794, accrued interest of approximately $9,799,211 and cash of approximately $178,187 for approximately 52,642,816 shares of the Pooled Portfolio (valued at approximately $526,428,158). For financial reporting purposes, investments transferred and shares received by the fund were recorded at fair value; however, the cost basis of the investments delivered to the Pooled Portfolio was carried forward to the shares received. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” in the Statement of Operations. The Pooled Portfolio does not charge a management fee, distribution and/or service fee, or sales charge.
40
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
At July 31, 2013, MFS held 62% of the outstanding shares of Class R1.
(4) Portfolio Securities
Purchases and sales of investments, other than purchased option transactions, in-kind transactions , and short-term obligations, aggregated $136,416,375 and $148,664,983, respectively.
(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Year ended 1/31/13 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares sold | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 6,540,417 | | | | $43,278,647 | | | | 25,363,634 | | | | $163,115,225 | |
Class B | | | 342,678 | | | | 2,271,828 | | | | 1,211,353 | | | | 7,775,847 | |
Class C | | | 971,674 | | | | 6,442,979 | | | | 2,577,620 | | | | 16,550,503 | |
Class I | | | 6,601,870 | | | | 43,117,380 | | | | 8,217,473 | | | | 52,839,400 | |
Class R1 | | | 2,312 | | | | 15,207 | | | | 8,920 | | | | 57,988 | |
Class R2 | | | 5,854 | | | | 38,792 | | | | 9,064 | | | | 58,993 | |
Class R3 | | | 203,274 | | | | 1,348,078 | | | | 1,048,142 | | | | 6,919,868 | |
Class R4 | | | 19,132 | | | | 127,518 | | | | 379,439 | | | | 2,439,280 | |
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | | | 29,891 | | | | 199,648 | | | | 150,933 | | | | 957,445 | |
| | | 14,717,102 | | | | $96,840,077 | | | | 38,966,578 | | | | $250,714,549 | |
| | | | |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,478,747 | | | | $9,758,983 | | | | 3,519,491 | | | | $22,664,449 | |
Class B | | | 106,749 | | | | 705,650 | | | | 240,455 | | | | 1,553,807 | |
Class C | | | 278,046 | | | | 1,831,313 | | | | 568,268 | | | | 3,660,437 | |
Class I | | | 294,284 | | | | 1,941,260 | | | | 385,756 | | | | 2,502,159 | |
Class R1 | | | 862 | | | | 5,695 | | | | 1,445 | | | | 9,356 | |
Class R2 | | | 1,251 | | | | 8,267 | | | | 2,003 | | | | 12,964 | |
Class R3 | | | 36,531 | | | | 240,932 | | | | 14,700 | | | | 95,917 | |
Class R4 | | | 6,240 | | | | 41,451 | | | | 15,947 | | | | 102,847 | |
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | | | 963 | | | | 6,270 | | | | 16,237 | | | | 103,669 | |
| | | 2,203,673 | | | | $14,539,821 | | | | 4,764,302 | | | | $30,705,605 | |
41
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Year ended 1/31/13 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares reacquired | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (14,582,002 | ) | | | $(96,325,852 | ) | | | (33,778,358 | ) | | | $(218,173,778 | ) |
Class B | | | (851,537 | ) | | | (5,632,417 | ) | | | (2,098,305 | ) | | | (13,536,803 | ) |
Class C | | | (1,647,165 | ) | | | (10,847,737 | ) | | | (2,308,205 | ) | | | (14,861,932 | ) |
Class I | | | (2,052,265 | ) | | | (13,554,076 | ) | | | (3,963,999 | ) | | | (25,345,361 | ) |
Class R1 | | | (10 | ) | | | (65 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Class R2 | | | (757 | ) | | | (5,043 | ) | | | (228 | ) | | | (1,495 | ) |
Class R3 | | | (187,120 | ) | | | (1,235,903 | ) | | | (42,216 | ) | | | (276,275 | ) |
Class R4 | | | (42,252 | ) | | | (282,649 | ) | | | (659,505 | ) | | | (4,124,237 | ) |
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | | | (319 | ) | | | (2,062 | ) | | | (1,362,632 | ) | | | (8,689,776 | ) |
| | | (19,363,427 | ) | | | $(127,885,804 | ) | | | (44,213,448 | ) | | | $(285,009,657 | ) |
| | | | |
Net change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (6,562,838 | ) | | | $(43,288,222 | ) | | | (4,895,233 | ) | | | $(32,394,104 | ) |
Class B | | | (402,110 | ) | | | (2,654,939 | ) | | | (646,497 | ) | | | (4,207,149 | ) |
Class C | | | (397,445 | ) | | | (2,573,445 | ) | | | 837,683 | | | | 5,349,008 | |
Class I | | | 4,843,889 | | | | 31,504,564 | | | | 4,639,230 | | | | 29,996,198 | |
Class R1 | | | 3,164 | | | | 20,837 | | | | 10,365 | | | | 67,344 | |
Class R2 | | | 6,348 | | | | 42,016 | | | | 10,839 | | | | 70,462 | |
Class R3 | | | 52,685 | | | | 353,107 | | | | 1,020,626 | | | | 6,739,510 | |
Class R4 | | | (16,880 | ) | | | (113,680 | ) | | | (264,119 | ) | | | (1,582,110 | ) |
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | | | 30,535 | | | | 203,856 | | | | (1,195,462 | ) | | | (7,628,662 | ) |
| | | (2,442,652 | ) | | | $(16,505,906 | ) | | | (482,568 | ) | | | $(3,589,503 | ) |
Redesignation of Class W to Class R5 – On May 10, 2012, sales of Class W shares (including exchanges) were suspended. On May 11, 2012, certain Class W shares were automatically converted to Class I shares. Shareholders of certain Class W shares became shareholders of Class I and received Class I shares with a total net asset value equal to their Class W shares at the time of the conversion. On May 30, 2012, remaining Class W shares, which represented MFS seed money, were redesignated Class R5. Class R5 shares are generally available only to certain eligible retirement plans and to funds distributed by MFD. Class R5 shares do not pay a 12b-1 distribution fee or sub-accounting costs. On June 1, 2012, Class R5 shares were offered for sale to the public.
(6) Line of Credit
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements
42
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $1,575 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations.
(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Funds | | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | | | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | | | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | | | Ending Shares/Par Amount | |
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio | | | — | | | | 56,328,009 | | | | (7,930,246 | ) | | | 48,397,763 | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | 23,476,201 | | | | 105,048,673 | | | | (113,683,100 | ) | | | 14,841,774 | |
| | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Funds | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | | Capital Gain Distributions | | | Dividend Income | | | Ending Value | |
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio | | | $11,507,377 | | | | $— | | | | $11,970,004 | | | | $475,266,029 | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,002 | | | | 14,841,774 | |
Total | | | $11,507,377 | | | | $— | | | | $11,979,006 | | | | $490,107,803 | |
43
APPENDIX A
MFS HIGH YIELD POOLED PORTFOLIO
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
7/31/13 (unaudited)
Appendix A is a complete list of all securities owned by MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
| | | | | | | | |
Bonds - 94.1% | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Aerospace - 2.3% | | | | | | | | |
Bombardier, Inc., 4.25%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 1,365,000 | | | $ | 1,416,188 | |
Bombardier, Inc., 7.5%, 2018 (n) | | | 4,435,000 | | | | 5,011,550 | |
Bombardier, Inc., 7.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,995,000 | | | | 3,421,788 | |
CPI International, Inc., 8%, 2018 | | | 3,355,000 | | | | 3,447,219 | |
Heckler & Koch GmbH, 9.5%, 2018 (z) | | EUR | 1,708,000 | | | | 2,079,325 | |
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 7.125%, 2021 | | $ | 4,810,000 | | | | 5,291,000 | |
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., 10%, 2017 | | | 4,355,000 | | | | 4,703,400 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 25,370,470 | |
Apparel Manufacturers - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Hanesbrands, Inc., 6.375%, 2020 | | $ | 2,690,000 | | | $ | 2,948,913 | |
Jones Group, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 | | | 2,350,000 | | | | 2,426,375 | |
PVH Corp., 7.375%, 2020 | | | 3,105,000 | | | | 3,403,856 | |
PVH Corp., 4.5%, 2022 | | | 1,820,000 | | | | 1,779,050 | |
Quiksilver, Inc., 10%, 2020 (z) | | | 230,000 | | | | 237,475 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,795,669 | |
Automotive - 3.7% | | | | | | | | |
Accuride Corp., 9.5%, 2018 | | $ | 4,515,000 | | | $ | 4,678,669 | |
Allison Transmission, Inc., 7.125%, 2019 (n) | | | 4,885,000 | | | | 5,214,738 | |
Continental Rubber of America Corp., 4.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 630,000 | | | | 640,548 | |
Delphi Corp., 5%, 2023 | | | 2,735,000 | | | | 2,844,400 | |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 12%, 2015 | | | 392,000 | | | | 461,251 | |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 8.125%, 2020 | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,967,202 | |
General Motors Financial Co., Inc., 4.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,465,000 | | | | 1,536,419 | |
General Motors Financial Co., Inc., 6.75%, 2018 | | | 3,120,000 | | | | 3,478,800 | |
General Motors Financial Co., Inc., 4.25%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,070,000 | | | | 1,027,200 | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 685,000 | | | | 763,775 | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 3,410,000 | | | | 3,567,713 | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 7%, 2022 | | | 1,110,000 | | | | 1,179,375 | |
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 7.75%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,260,000 | | | | 2,463,400 | |
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 8.125%, 2021 (n) | | | 4,605,000 | | | | 5,100,038 | |
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 5.625%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,360,000 | | | | 1,332,800 | |
Lear Corp., 8.125%, 2020 | | | 1,637,000 | | | | 1,804,793 | |
Lear Corp., 4.75%, 2023 (n) | | | 755,000 | | | | 739,900 | |
LKQ Corp., 4.75%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,220,000 | | | | 1,169,675 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 39,970,696 | |
44
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Broadcasting - 5.0% | | | | | | | | |
Allbritton Communications Co., 8%, 2018 | | $ | 1,310,000 | | | $ | 1,416,438 | |
AMC Networks, Inc., 7.75%, 2021 | | | 4,350,000 | | | | 4,872,000 | |
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., 9%, 2021 | | | 3,483,000 | | | | 3,430,755 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., 6.5%, 2022 | | | 745,000 | | | | 771,075 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., 6.5%, 2022 | | | 2,570,000 | | | | 2,685,650 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., “A”, 7.625%, 2020 | | | 140,000 | | | | 146,300 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., “B”, 7.625%, 2020 | | | 1,390,000 | | | | 1,466,450 | |
Hughes Network Systems LLC, 7.625%, 2021 | | | 1,745,000 | | | | 1,888,963 | |
IAC/InterActive Corp., 4.75%, 2022 | | | 870,000 | | | | 822,150 | |
Inmarsat Finance PLC, 7.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,130,000 | | | | 2,241,825 | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A., 6.625%, 2022 (n) | | | 3,520,000 | | | | 3,599,200 | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A., 6.625%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,240,000 | | | | 1,267,900 | |
Intelsat S.A., 8.125%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,455,000 | | | | 2,639,125 | |
LBI Media, Inc., 13.5% to 2015, 11.5% to 2020 (p)(z) | | | 1,196,098 | | | | 418,634 | |
Liberty Media Corp., 8.5%, 2029 | | | 2,790,000 | | | | 3,072,488 | |
Liberty Media Corp., 8.25%, 2030 | | | 1,215,000 | | | | 1,313,719 | |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 (p)(z) | | | 2,435,088 | | | | 2,471,614 | |
Netflix, Inc., 5.375%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,115,000 | | | | 2,136,150 | |
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., 8.875%, 2017 | | | 1,035,000 | | | | 1,120,388 | |
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., 6.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 975,000 | | | | 1,009,125 | |
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., 9.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,540,000 | | | | 1,632,400 | |
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., 8.375%, 2018 | | | 345,000 | | | | 373,463 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 8.75%, 2015 (n) | | | 2,015,000 | | | | 2,271,913 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 7.625%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,615,000 | | | | 2,883,038 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 4.25%, 2020 (n) | | | 650,000 | | | | 604,500 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 5.25%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,430,000 | | | | 1,383,525 | |
Univision Communications, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,200,000 | | | | 2,348,500 | |
Univision Communications, Inc., 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,890,000 | | | | 2,074,275 | |
Univision Communications, Inc., 8.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,170,000 | | | | 2,387,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 54,748,563 | |
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
E*TRADE Financial Corp., 6.375%, 2019 | | $ | 6,420,000 | | | $ | 6,821,250 | |
| | |
Building - 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
ABC Supply Co., Inc., 5.625%, 2021 (n) | | $ | 575,000 | | | $ | 573,563 | |
Boise Cascade Co., 6.375%, 2020 | | | 2,045,000 | | | | 2,114,019 | |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 6.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,704,000 | |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 7%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,925,000 | | | | 2,059,750 | |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 6.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,530,000 | | | | 1,637,100 | |
CEMEX Espana S.A., 9.25%, 2020 | | | 1,405,000 | | | | 1,534,963 | |
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 5.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 202,000 | | | | 202,000 | |
45
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Building - continued | | | | | | | | |
Gibraltar Industries, Inc., 6.25%, 2021 (n) | | $ | 870,000 | | | $ | 891,750 | |
HD Supply, Inc., 8.125%, 2019 | | | 1,630,000 | | | | 1,825,600 | |
HD Supply, Inc., 11.5%, 2020 | | | 2,415,000 | | | | 2,864,794 | |
Nortek, Inc., 8.5%, 2021 | | | 4,470,000 | | | | 4,838,775 | |
Roofing Supply Group LLC/Roofing Supply Finance, Inc., 10%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,952,000 | | | | 2,147,200 | |
USG Corp., 6.3%, 2016 | | | 3,782,000 | | | | 3,914,370 | |
USG Corp., 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 1,478,513 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 27,786,397 | |
Business Services - 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
Equinix, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | | $ | 3,070,000 | | | $ | 3,039,300 | |
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., 5%, 2022 | | | 3,305,000 | | | | 3,379,363 | |
iGATE Corp., 9%, 2016 | | | 3,670,000 | | | | 3,959,013 | |
Iron Mountain, Inc., 8.375%, 2021 | | | 3,800,000 | | | | 4,118,250 | |
Legend Acquisition Sub, Inc., 10.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,540,000 | | | | 1,262,800 | |
Neustar, Inc., 4.5%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,055,000 | | | | 1,921,425 | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., 7.375%, 2018 | | | 910,000 | | | | 964,600 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 18,644,751 | |
Cable TV - 3.5% | | | | | | | | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 8.125%, 2020 | | $ | 3,970,000 | | | $ | 4,317,375 | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 7.375%, 2020 | | | 705,000 | | | | 759,638 | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 6.5%, 2021 | | | 4,500,000 | | | | 4,623,750 | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 5.125%, 2023 | | | 2,025,000 | | | | 1,852,875 | |
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Capital Corp., 5.75%, 2024 | | | 1,315,000 | | | | 1,229,525 | |
Cequel Communications Holdings, 6.375%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,350,000 | | | | 2,426,375 | |
DISH DBS Corp., 6.75%, 2021 | | | 2,540,000 | | | | 2,692,400 | |
DISH DBS Corp., 5%, 2023 | | | 1,365,000 | | | | 1,279,688 | |
EchoStar Corp., 7.125%, 2016 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,737,500 | |
Lynx I Corp., 5.375%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,390,000 | | | | 1,407,375 | |
Lynx II Corp., 6.375%, 2023 (n) | | | 800,000 | | | | 821,000 | |
Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, 6.25%, 2021 (z) | | | 235,000 | | | | 236,175 | |
Nara Cable Funding Ltd., 8.875%, 2018 (z) | | | 840,000 | | | | 882,000 | |
Telenet Finance Luxembourg, 6.375%, 2020 (n) | | EUR | 1,510,000 | | | | 2,113,288 | |
Unitymedia Hessen, 5.5%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 370,000 | | | | 359,825 | |
UPC Holding B.V., 9.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 3,555,000 | | | | 3,874,950 | |
UPCB Finance III Ltd., 6.625%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,628,000 | | | | 3,881,960 | |
Virgin Media Finance PLC, 8.375%, 2019 | | | 241,000 | | | | 262,088 | |
Ziggo Bond Co. B.V., 8%, 2018 (n) | | EUR | 1,895,000 | | | | 2,697,484 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 38,455,271 | |
46
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Chemicals - 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
Celanese U.S. Holdings LLC, 6.625%, 2018 | | $ | 3,755,000 | | | $ | 4,008,463 | |
Flash Dutch 2 B.V./U.S. Coatings Acquisition, 7.375%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,015,000 | | | | 1,051,794 | |
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp., 6.625%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,022,500 | |
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, 8.875%, 2018 | | | 1,860,000 | | | | 1,934,400 | |
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, 9%, 2020 | | | 1,630,000 | | | | 1,650,375 | |
Huntsman International LLC, 8.625%, 2021 | | | 4,095,000 | | | | 4,617,113 | |
INEOS Finance PLC, 8.375%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,290,000 | | | | 3,610,775 | |
INEOS Group Holdings S.A., 6.125%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,035,000 | | | | 1,984,125 | |
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., 5%, 2019 | | | 1,535,000 | | | | 1,699,518 | |
NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5.25%, 2023 (z) | | | 1,410,000 | | | | 1,410,000 | |
Polypore International, Inc., 7.5%, 2017 | | | 1,450,000 | | | | 1,529,750 | |
Tronox Finance LLC, 6.375%, 2020 (z) | | | 1,435,000 | | | | 1,374,013 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 25,892,826 | |
Computer Software - 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Infor U.S., Inc., 11.5%, 2018 | | $ | 1,940,000 | | | $ | 2,235,850 | |
Nuance Communications, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 (n) | | | 960,000 | | | | 936,000 | |
Syniverse Holdings, Inc., 9.125%, 2019 | | | 4,140,000 | | | | 4,471,200 | |
TransUnion Holding Co., Inc., 9.625%, 2018 | | | 1,110,000 | | | | 1,204,350 | |
TransUnion LLC/TransUnion Financing Corp., 11.375%, 2018 | | | 915,000 | | | | 1,028,231 | |
Verisign, Inc., 4.625%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,830,000 | | | | 1,756,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,632,431 | |
Computer Software - Systems - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Audatex North America, Inc., 6.75%, 2018 | | $ | 2,070,000 | | | $ | 2,209,725 | |
Audatex North America, Inc., 6%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,485,000 | | | | 1,510,988 | |
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 12.535%, 2017 | | | 741,000 | | | | 781,755 | |
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 8.5%, 2019 | | | 2,920,000 | | | | 3,204,700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,707,168 | |
Conglomerates - 1.9% | | | | | | | | |
Amsted Industries, Inc., 8.125%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 4,580,000 | | | $ | 4,866,250 | |
BC Mountain LLC, 7%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,685,000 | | | | 1,752,400 | |
Dynacast International LLC, 9.25%, 2019 | | | 1,875,000 | | | | 2,053,125 | |
Griffon Corp., 7.125%, 2018 | | | 3,200,000 | | | | 3,368,000 | |
Renaissance Acquisition, 6.875%, 2021 (z) | | | 2,920,000 | | | | 2,905,400 | |
Rexel S.A., 6.125%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,180,000 | | | | 2,261,750 | |
Rexel S.A., 5.25%, 2020 (n) | | | 595,000 | | | | 592,025 | |
Silver II Borrower, 7.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,925,000 | | | | 3,063,938 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 20,862,888 | |
Construction - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Empresas ICA Sociedad Controladora S.A. de C.V., 8.9%, 2021 | | $ | 665,000 | | | $ | 618,450 | |
47
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Products - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Elizabeth Arden, Inc., 7.375%, 2021 | | $ | 2,872,000 | | | $ | 3,101,760 | |
Jarden Corp., 7.5%, 2020 | | | 2,515,000 | | | | 2,700,481 | |
Libbey Glass, Inc., 6.875%, 2020 | | | 795,000 | | | | 850,650 | |
Prestige Brands, Inc., 8.125%, 2020 | | | 1,240,000 | | | | 1,367,100 | |
Spectrum Brands Escrow Corp., 6.375%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,245,000 | | | | 2,385,313 | |
Spectrum Brands Escrow Corp., 6.625%, 2022 (n) | | | 210,000 | | | | 224,700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,630,004 | |
Consumer Services - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
QVC, Inc., 7.375%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 1,925,000 | | | $ | 2,101,779 | |
Service Corp. International, 7%, 2017 | | | 3,515,000 | | | | 3,892,863 | |
Service Corp. International, 7%, 2019 | | | 1,085,000 | | | | 1,167,731 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,162,373 | |
Containers - 3.1% | | | | | | | | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC , 7%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 950,000 | | | $ | 935,750 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 7.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,335,000 | | | | 2,483,856 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 9.125%, 2020 (n) | | | 400,000 | | | | 434,000 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 9.125%, 2020 (n) | | | 4,480,000 | | | | 4,838,400 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 4.875%, 2022 (z) | | | 790,000 | | | | 768,275 | |
Ball Corp., 5%, 2022 | | | 1,008,000 | | | | 1,010,520 | |
Ball Corp., 4%, 2023 | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 1,221,525 | |
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., 9.5%, 2018 | | | 1,030,000 | | | | 1,117,550 | |
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., 9.75%, 2021 | | | 2,285,000 | | | | 2,673,450 | |
Crown Americas LLC, 4.5%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,315,000 | | | | 2,158,738 | |
Greif, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | | | 2,090,000 | | | | 2,309,450 | |
Greif, Inc., 7.75%, 2019 | | | 980,000 | | | | 1,117,200 | |
Reynolds Group, 7.125%, 2019 | | | 3,095,000 | | | | 3,303,913 | |
Reynolds Group, 9.875%, 2019 | | | 1,355,000 | | | | 1,463,400 | |
Reynolds Group, 5.75%, 2020 | | | 2,050,000 | | | | 2,085,875 | |
Reynolds Group, 8.25%, 2021 | | | 5,660,000 | | | | 5,759,050 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 33,680,952 | |
Defense Electronics - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Ducommun, Inc., 9.75%, 2018 | | $ | 2,452,000 | | | $ | 2,721,720 | |
MOOG, Inc., 7.25%, 2018 | | | 1,615,000 | | | | 1,671,525 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,393,245 | |
Electrical Equipment - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Avaya, Inc., 9.75%, 2015 | | $ | 1,180,000 | | | $ | 1,156,400 | |
Avaya, Inc., 7%, 2019 (n) | | | 665,000 | | | | 613,463 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,769,863 | |
48
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Electronics - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 9.25%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 3,825,000 | | | $ | 4,145,344 | |
Nokia Corp., 5.375%, 2019 | | | 995,000 | | | | 970,125 | |
Nokia Corp., 6.625%, 2039 | | | 1,015,000 | | | | 893,200 | |
NXP B.V., 9.75%, 2018 (n) | | | 149,000 | | | | 166,135 | |
NXP B.V., 5.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 640,000 | | | | 657,600 | |
NXP B.V., 5.75%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,095,000 | | | | 2,115,950 | |
Sensata Technologies B.V., 6.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,320,000 | | | | 3,552,400 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,500,754 | |
Energy - Independent - 7.8% | | | | | | | | |
Berry Petroleum Corp., 6.75%, 2020 | | $ | 685,000 | | | $ | 708,975 | |
BreitBurn Energy Partners LP, 8.625%, 2020 | | | 1,075,000 | | | | 1,144,875 | |
Breitburn Energy Partners LP, 7.875%, 2022 | | | 3,395,000 | | | | 3,420,463 | |
Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc., 8.625%, 2018 | | | 1,055,000 | | | | 1,152,588 | |
Chaparral Energy, Inc., 7.625%, 2022 | | | 2,135,000 | | | | 2,183,038 | |
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 6.875%, 2020 | | | 2,980,000 | | | | 3,263,100 | |
Concho Resources, Inc., 6.5%, 2022 | | | 3,440,000 | | | | 3,680,800 | |
Concho Resources, Inc., 5.5%, 2023 | | | 2,845,000 | | | | 2,837,888 | |
Continental Resources, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | | | 2,860,000 | | | | 3,131,700 | |
Continental Resources, Inc., 7.375%, 2020 | | | 490,000 | | | | 543,900 | |
Continental Resources, Inc., 4.5%, 2023 | | | 2,253,000 | | | | 2,191,043 | |
Denbury Resources, Inc., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 4,185,000 | | | | 4,603,500 | |
Denbury Resources, Inc., 4.625%, 2023 | | | 1,065,000 | | | | 974,475 | |
Energy XXI Gulf Coast, Inc., 9.25%, 2017 | | | 3,990,000 | | | | 4,428,900 | |
EP Energy LLC, 9.375%, 2020 | | | 5,295,000 | | | | 6,009,825 | |
EP Energy LLC, 7.75%, 2022 | | | 3,205,000 | | | | 3,525,500 | |
EPL Oil & Gas, Inc., 8.25%, 2018 | | | 2,270,000 | | | | 2,394,850 | |
Halcon Resources Corp., 8.875%, 2021 | | | 3,560,000 | | | | 3,595,600 | |
Harvest Operations Corp., 6.875%, 2017 | | | 4,165,000 | | | | 4,591,913 | |
Hilcorp Energy I/Hilcorp Finance Co., 8%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,670,000 | | | | 1,809,863 | |
Laredo Petroleum, Inc., 9.5%, 2019 | | | 2,210,000 | | | | 2,453,100 | |
LINN Energy LLC, 8.625%, 2020 | | | 740,000 | | | | 769,600 | |
LINN Energy LLC, 7.75%, 2021 | | | 3,044,000 | | | | 3,074,440 | |
MEG Energy Corp., 6.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,955,000 | | | | 1,994,100 | |
QEP Resources, Inc., 6.875%, 2021 | | | 3,395,000 | | | | 3,785,425 | |
Range Resources Corp., 8%, 2019 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,350,000 | |
Range Resources Corp., 5%, 2022 | | | 2,620,000 | | | | 2,646,200 | |
Rosetta Resources, Inc., 5.625%, 2021 | | | 1,085,000 | | | | 1,085,000 | |
Samson Investment Co., 10%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,265,000 | | | | 3,460,900 | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., 8.125%, 2022 | | | 2,905,000 | | | | 2,948,575 | |
SM Energy Co., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 2,905,000 | | | | 3,079,300 | |
Whiting Petroleum Corp., 6.5%, 2018 | | | 2,270,000 | | | | 2,406,200 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 85,245,636 | |
49
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Engineering - Construction - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
BakerCorp International, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | | $ | 2,500,000 | | | $ | 2,518,750 | |
| | |
Entertainment - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
AMC Entertainment, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 | | $ | 1,605,000 | | | $ | 1,737,413 | |
Cedar Fair LP, 9.125%, 2018 | | | 1,585,000 | | | | 1,747,463 | |
Cedar Fair LP, 5.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 1,304,963 | |
Cinemark USA, Inc., 4.875%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,620,000 | | | | 1,530,900 | |
Cinemark USA, Inc., 5.125%, 2022 | | | 535,000 | | | | 515,606 | |
NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC, 8.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 981,000 | | | | 1,065,366 | |
NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC, 5%, 2018 (z) | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 1,317,875 | |
Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 5.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 3,490,000 | | | | 3,411,475 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,631,061 | |
Financial Institutions - 5.2% | | | | | | | | |
Aviation Capital Group, 4.625%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 3,015,000 | | | $ | 3,028,064 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5.25%, 2014 (n) | | | 1,360,000 | | | | 1,387,200 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5.25%, 2018 | | | 2,875,000 | | | | 3,054,688 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 6.625%, 2018 (n) | | | 5,026,000 | | | | 5,553,730 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,342,000 | | | | 3,504,923 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5%, 2022 | | | 1,950,000 | | | | 1,932,938 | |
Credit Acceptance Corp., 9.125%, 2017 | | | 2,010,000 | | | | 2,145,675 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 7.75%, 2016 | | | 680,000 | | | | 706,350 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 8%, 2018 | | | 3,922,000 | | | | 4,142,613 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 6%, 2020 (z) | | | 1,530,000 | | | | 1,530,000 | |
International Lease Finance Corp., 4.875%, 2015 | | | 1,120,000 | | | | 1,153,600 | |
International Lease Finance Corp., 8.625%, 2015 | | | 1,130,000 | | | | 1,251,475 | |
International Lease Finance Corp., 7.125%, 2018 (n) | | | 3,373,000 | | | | 3,803,058 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 10.875%, 2015 | | | 3,185,000 | | | | 3,348,231 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 6.5%, 2018 | | | 1,270,000 | | | | 1,282,700 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 9.625%, 2019 | | | 1,320,000 | | | | 1,485,000 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 7.875%, 2020 | | | 1,380,000 | | | | 1,480,050 | |
PHH Corp., 9.25%, 2016 | | | 1,620,000 | | | | 1,830,600 | |
PHH Corp., 7.375%, 2019 | | | 2,060,000 | | | | 2,258,275 | |
SLM Corp., 8.45%, 2018 | | | 2,310,000 | | | | 2,656,777 | |
SLM Corp., 8%, 2020 | | | 5,765,000 | | | | 6,427,975 | |
SLM Corp., 7.25%, 2022 | | | 2,410,000 | | | | 2,554,600 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 56,518,522 | |
Food & Beverages - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
ARAMARK Corp., 5.75%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 1,355,000 | | | $ | 1,409,200 | |
B&G Foods, Inc., 4.625%, 2021 | | | 1,295,000 | | | | 1,251,294 | |
Constellation Brands, Inc., 7.25%, 2016 | | | 1,175,000 | | | | 1,336,563 | |
50
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Food & Beverages - continued | | | | | | | | |
Constellation Brands, Inc., 3.75%, 2021 | | $ | 430,000 | | | $ | 402,050 | |
Constellation Brands, Inc., 4.25%, 2023 | | | 860,000 | | | | 810,550 | |
Hawk Acquisition Sub, Inc., 4.25%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,185,000 | | | | 2,097,600 | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC, 4.875%, 2021 (z) | | | 505,000 | | | | 473,438 | |
Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,203,000 | |
TreeHouse Foods, Inc., 7.75%, 2018 | | | 2,220,000 | | | | 2,364,300 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,347,995 | |
Forest & Paper Products - 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Boise, Inc., 8%, 2020 | | $ | 2,340,000 | | | $ | 2,515,500 | |
Graphic Packaging Holding Co., 7.875%, 2018 | | | 1,875,000 | | | | 2,039,063 | |
Sappi Papier Holding GmbH, 7.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,075,000 | | | | 1,128,750 | |
Smurfit Kappa Group PLC, 4.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,496,250 | |
Smurfit Kappa Group PLC, 7.75%, 2019 (n) | | EUR | 1,140,000 | | | | 1,656,247 | |
Tembec Industries, Inc., 11.25%, 2018 | | $ | 1,340,000 | | | | 1,453,900 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,289,710 | |
Gaming & Lodging - 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
Caesars Entertainment Operating Co., Inc., 8.5%, 2020 | | $ | 1,330,000 | | | $ | 1,238,563 | |
Chester Downs & Marina LLC, 9.25%, 2020 (z) | | | 1,450,000 | | | | 1,435,500 | |
Choice Hotels International, Inc., 5.75%, 2022 | | | 430,000 | | | | 451,500 | |
CityCenter Holdings LLC, 10.75%, 2017 (p) | | | 1,110,000 | | | | 1,198,800 | |
Fontainebleau Las Vegas Holdings LLC, 10.25%, 2015 (a)(d)(n) | | | 4,490,000 | | | | 2,806 | |
GWR Operating Partnership LLP, 10.875%, 2017 | | | 1,055,000 | | | | 1,180,281 | |
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., REIT, 5.25%, 2022 | | | 1,460,000 | | | | 1,520,802 | |
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., 8.875%, 2020 | | | 2,675,000 | | | | 2,808,750 | |
MGM Resorts International, 11.375%, 2018 | | | 3,400,000 | | | | 4,301,000 | |
MGM Resorts International, 6.625%, 2021 | | | 1,580,000 | | | | 1,666,900 | |
NCL Corp., 5%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,070,000 | | | | 1,067,325 | |
Peninsula Gaming LLC, 8.375%, 2018 (z) | | | 615,000 | | | | 665,738 | |
Penn National Gaming, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 | | | 3,083,000 | | | | 3,383,593 | |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 8.75%, 2020 | | | 2,130,000 | | | | 2,305,725 | |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 7.75%, 2022 | | | 920,000 | | | | 963,700 | |
PNK Finance Corp., 6.375%, 2021 (z) | | | 940,000 | | | | 947,050 | |
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., REIT, 5%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,105,000 | | | | 1,082,900 | |
Seven Seas Cruises S. DE R.L., 9.125%, 2019 | | | 3,845,000 | | | | 4,142,988 | |
Viking Cruises Ltd., 8.5%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,925,000 | | | | 2,122,313 | |
Wynn Las Vegas LLC, 7.75%, 2020 | | | 4,085,000 | | | | 4,595,625 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 37,081,859 | |
Industrial - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Dematic S.A., 7.75%, 2020 (z) | | $ | 4,995,000 | | | $ | 5,257,238 | |
Hyva Global B.V., 8.625%, 2016 (n) | | | 1,760,000 | | | | 1,597,200 | |
51
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Industrial - continued | | | | | | | | |
Mueller Water Products, Inc., 8.75%, 2020 | | $ | 1,461,000 | | | $ | 1,601,621 | |
SPL Logistics Escrow LLC, 8.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,675,000 | | | | 2,782,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,238,059 | |
Insurance - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
MetLife, Inc., 9.25% to 2038, FRN to 2068 (n) | | $ | 700,000 | | | $ | 931,000 | |
| | |
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 10.75% to 2038, FRN to 2088 (n) | | $ | 2,950,000 | | | $ | 4,498,750 | |
XL Group PLC, FRN, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2049 | | | 4,645,000 | | | | 4,563,713 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 9,062,463 | |
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 2016 | | $ | 170,000 | | | $ | 175,950 | |
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 2017 | | | 2,170,000 | | | | 2,248,663 | |
Electricite de France, FRN, 5.25%, 2049 (n) | | | 243,000 | | | | 232,369 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,656,982 | |
Machinery & Tools - 2.3% | | | | | | | | |
Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 2017 | | $ | 5,450,000 | | | $ | 6,390,125 | |
CNH America LLC, 7.25%, 2016 | | | 1,190,000 | | | | 1,303,050 | |
CNH Capital LLC, 3.875%, 2015 | | | 1,285,000 | | | | 1,320,338 | |
CNH Capital LLC, 6.25%, 2016 | | | 670,000 | | | | 731,975 | |
CNH Capital LLC, 3.625%, 2018 | | | 2,105,000 | | | | 2,068,163 | |
H&E Equipment Services Co., 7%, 2022 | | | 2,725,000 | | | | 2,915,750 | |
NESCO LLC/NESCO Holdings Corp., 11.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 3,440,000 | | | | 3,835,600 | |
RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., 8.25%, 2021 | | | 2,505,000 | | | | 2,799,338 | |
United Rentals North America, Inc., 5.75%, 2018 | | | 1,195,000 | | | | 1,278,650 | |
United Rentals North America, Inc., 7.625%, 2022 | | | 2,198,000 | | | | 2,450,770 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 25,093,759 | |
Major Banks - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Bank of America Corp., FRN, 5.2%, 2049 | | $ | 3,110,000 | | | $ | 2,799,000 | |
Barclays Bank PLC, 7.625%, 2022 | | | 2,965,000 | | | | 2,950,175 | |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 7.648% to 2031, FRN to 2049 | | | 4,955,000 | | | | 4,707,250 | |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 6.99% to 2017, FRN to 2049 (n) | | | 905,000 | | | | 877,850 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,334,275 | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 5.4% | | | | | | | | |
AmSurg Corp., 5.625%, 2020 | | $ | 3,295,000 | | | $ | 3,360,900 | |
CDRT Holding Corp., 9.25%, 2017 (n)(p) | | | 665,000 | | | | 679,131 | |
Davita, Inc., 6.375%, 2018 | | | 4,650,000 | | | | 4,929,000 | |
52
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - continued | | | | | |
Davita, Inc., 6.625%, 2020 | | $ | 4,110,000 | | | $ | 4,387,425 | |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, 9%, 2015 (n) | | | 1,180,000 | | | | 1,309,800 | |
Fresenius Medical Care Capital Trust III, 5.625%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,455,000 | | | | 3,657,981 | |
Fresenius Medical Care Capital Trust III, 5.875%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,375,000 | | | | 1,450,625 | |
HCA, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 | | | 5,680,000 | | | | 6,148,600 | |
HCA, Inc., 7.25%, 2020 | | | 2,795,000 | | | | 3,057,031 | |
HCA, Inc., 7.5%, 2022 | | | 5,140,000 | | | | 5,795,350 | |
HCA, Inc., 5.875%, 2022 | | | 2,960,000 | | | | 3,130,200 | |
HealthSouth Corp., 8.125%, 2020 | | | 4,780,000 | | | | 5,234,100 | |
IASIS Healthcare LLC/IASIS Capital Corp., 8.375%, 2019 | | | 2,385,000 | | | | 2,504,250 | |
Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 12.5%, 2019 | | | 665,000 | | | | 702,406 | |
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 9.25%, 2015 | | | 2,145,000 | | | | 2,338,050 | |
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 8%, 2020 | | | 2,895,000 | | | | 3,075,938 | |
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 4.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,230,000 | | | | 2,079,475 | |
Universal Health Services, Inc., 7%, 2018 | | | 1,715,000 | | | | 1,811,469 | |
Universal Health Services, Inc., 7.625%, 2020 | | | 3,495,000 | | | | 3,695,963 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 59,347,694 | |
Medical Equipment - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Biomet, Inc., 6.5%, 2020 | | $ | 1,885,000 | | | $ | 1,979,250 | |
Physio-Control International, Inc., 9.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 1,430,000 | | | | 1,587,300 | |
Teleflex, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 | | | 2,550,000 | | | | 2,703,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,269,550 | |
Metals & Mining - 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
ArcelorMittal S.A., 6.75%, 2041 | | $ | 1,735,000 | | | $ | 1,607,044 | |
Arch Coal, Inc., 7.25%, 2020 | | | 3,300,000 | | | | 2,673,000 | |
Boart Longyear Ltd., 7%, 2021 (z) | | | 595,000 | | | | 538,475 | |
Century Aluminum Co., 7.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,775,000 | | | | 2,580,750 | |
Cloud Peak Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 2017 | | | 3,880,000 | | | | 4,093,400 | |
Cloud Peak Energy, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 | | | 1,245,000 | | | | 1,344,600 | |
Commercial Metals Co., 4.875%, 2023 | | | 1,090,000 | | | | 1,013,700 | |
Consol Energy, Inc., 8%, 2017 | | | 2,510,000 | | | | 2,676,288 | |
Consol Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 2,250,000 | | | | 2,424,375 | |
First Quantum Minerals Ltd., 7.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,787,000 | | | | 3,692,325 | |
Fortescue Metals Group Ltd., 8.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,780,000 | | | | 2,932,900 | |
Peabody Energy Corp., 6%, 2018 | | | 2,110,000 | | | | 2,157,475 | |
Peabody Energy Corp., 6.25%, 2021 | | | 1,110,000 | | | | 1,087,800 | |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 6.125%, 2019 | | | 3,195,000 | | | | 3,422,353 | |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 8.625%, 2019 | | | 2,405,000 | | | | 2,663,538 | |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 6.5%, 2020 | | | 800,000 | | | | 861,000 | |
Walter Energy Inc., 8.5%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,690,000 | | | | 1,373,125 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 37,142,148 | |
53
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Municipals - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1-A”, 4.5%, 2023 | | $ | 1,465,000 | | | $ | 1,362,230 | |
| | |
Natural Gas - Distribution - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
AmeriGas Finance LLC, 6.75%, 2020 | | $ | 4,040,000 | | | $ | 4,292,500 | |
Ferrellgas LP/Ferrellgas Finance Corp., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 1,695,000 | | | | 1,711,950 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,004,450 | |
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 3.3% | | | | | | | | |
Access Midstream Partners Co., 4.875%, 2023 | | $ | 2,240,000 | | | $ | 2,128,000 | |
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP, 4.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 860,000 | | | | 789,050 | |
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP, 5.875%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,610,000 | | | | 1,537,550 | �� |
Crosstex Energy, Inc., 8.875%, 2018 | | | 4,180,000 | | | | 4,451,700 | |
El Paso Corp., 7%, 2017 | | | 3,020,000 | | | | 3,364,839 | |
El Paso Corp., 7.75%, 2032 | | | 4,230,000 | | | | 4,494,337 | |
Energy Transfer Equity LP, 7.5%, 2020 | | | 3,405,000 | | | | 3,834,881 | |
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 8.375% to 2016, FRN to 2066 | | | 1,641,000 | | | | 1,829,715 | |
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 7.034% to 2018, FRN to 2068 | | | 760,000 | | | | 853,100 | |
Inergy Midstream LP, 6%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,240,000 | | | | 3,256,200 | |
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 5.5%, 2023 | | | 1,885,000 | | | | 1,903,850 | |
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 4.5%, 2023 | | | 2,429,000 | | | | 2,283,260 | |
Sabine Pass Liquefaction, 5.625%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,825,000 | | | | 1,799,906 | |
Sabine Pass Liquefaction, 5.625%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,470,000 | | | | 2,408,250 | |
Summit Midstream Holdings LLC, 7.5%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,255,000 | | | | 1,280,100 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 36,214,738 | |
Network & Telecom - 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Centurylink, Inc., 6.45%, 2021 | | $ | 1,000,000 | | | $ | 1,055,000 | |
Centurylink, Inc., 7.65%, 2042 | | | 2,830,000 | | | | 2,674,350 | |
Citizens Communications Co., 9%, 2031 | | | 1,970,000 | | | | 1,930,600 | |
Frontier Communications Corp., 8.125%, 2018 | | | 870,000 | | | | 970,050 | |
Qwest Corp., 7.5%, 2014 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,211 | |
TW Telecom Holdings, Inc., 5.375%, 2022 | | | 1,900,000 | | | | 1,909,500 | |
Windstream Corp., 8.125%, 2018 | | | 525,000 | | | | 559,125 | |
Windstream Corp., 7.75%, 2020 | | | 2,345,000 | | | | 2,497,425 | |
Windstream Corp., 7.75%, 2021 | | | 690,000 | | | | 734,850 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,334,111 | |
Oil Services - 1.5% | | | | | | | | |
Bristow Group, Inc., 6.25%, 2022 | | $ | 2,220,000 | | | $ | 2,308,800 | |
Chesapeake Oilfield Operating LLC, 6.625%, 2019 | | | 875,000 | | | | 883,750 | |
Dresser-Rand Group, Inc., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,065,000 | |
Edgen Murray Corp., 8.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,215,000 | | | | 3,215,000 | |
54
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Oil Services - continued | | | | | | | | |
Pacific Drilling S.A., 5.375%, 2020 (z) | | $ | 1,870,000 | | | $ | 1,832,600 | |
Shale-Inland Holdings LLC/Finance Co., 8.75%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,460,000 | | | | 3,589,750 | |
Unit Corp., 6.625%, 2021 | | | 3,595,000 | | | | 3,738,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 16,633,700 | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 5.5%, 2017 | | $ | 7,090,000 | | | $ | 7,495,725 | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 6.25%, 2017 | | | 2,010,000 | | | | 2,177,666 | |
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 2019, FRN to 2049 (n) | | | 2,973,000 | | | | 3,675,371 | |
LBG Capital No. 1 PLC, 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 4,720,000 | | | | 4,993,760 | |
Santander UK PLC, 8.963% to 2030, FRN to 2049 | | | 5,687,000 | | | | 7,108,750 | |
UBS AG, 7.625%, 2022 | | | 1,160,000 | | | | 1,290,523 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 26,741,795 | |
Pharmaceuticals - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Capsugel FinanceCo. SCA, 9.875%, 2019 (n) | | EUR | 2,270,000 | | | $ | 3,378,507 | |
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 7%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 2,805,000 | | | | 2,973,300 | |
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 7.25%, 2022 (n) | | | 2,700,000 | | | | 2,868,750 | |
Vantage Point Imaging, 7.5%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,560,000 | | | | 1,673,100 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,893,657 | |
Pollution Control - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Heckmann Corp., 9.875%, 2018 | | $ | 2,480,000 | | | $ | 2,548,200 | |
| | |
Precious Metals & Minerals - 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Eldorado Gold Corp., 6.125%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 2,195,000 | | | $ | 2,107,200 | |
IAMGOLD Corp., 6.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,467,000 | | | | 2,946,950 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 5,054,150 | |
Printing & Publishing - 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
American Media, Inc., 13.5%, 2018 (z) | | $ | 338,724 | | | $ | 342,111 | |
Gannett Co., Inc., 5.125%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,415,000 | | | | 1,411,463 | |
Lamar Media Corp., 5%, 2023 | | | 2,055,000 | | | | 1,967,663 | |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 7.75%, 2018 | | | 2,040,000 | | | | 2,218,500 | |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 4.5%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,405,000 | | | | 3,345,413 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 9,285,150 | |
Railroad & Shipping - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Kansas City Southern de Mexico S.A. de C.V., 6.125%, 2021 | | $ | 184,000 | | | $ | 207,000 | |
Watco Cos. LLC, 6.375%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,315,000 | | | | 1,311,713 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,518,713 | |
55
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc., REIT, 7.25%, 2019 | | $ | 1,525,000 | | | $ | 1,551,688 | |
DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc., REIT, 8.5%, 2017 | | | 2,145,000 | | | | 2,279,063 | |
ERP Properties, REIT, 7.75%, 2020 | | | 1,805,000 | | | | 2,054,200 | |
ERP Properties, REIT, 5.75%, 2022 | | | 805,000 | | | | 819,273 | |
Felcor Lodging LP, REIT, 5.625%, 2023 | | | 405,000 | | | | 394,875 | |
Kennedy Wilson, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 | | | 975,000 | | | | 1,057,875 | |
MPT Operating Partnership LP, REIT, 6.875%, 2021 | | | 2,275,000 | | | | 2,428,563 | |
MPT Operating Partnership LP, REIT, 6.375%, 2022 | | | 2,540,000 | | | | 2,673,350 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 13,258,887 | |
Retailers - 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
Academy Ltd., 9.25%, 2019 (n) | | $ | 1,375,000 | | | $ | 1,540,000 | |
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp., 10%, 2019 | | | 2,770,000 | | | | 3,095,475 | |
CST Brands, Inc., 5%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,770,000 | | | | 1,747,875 | |
J. Crew Group, Inc., 8.125%, 2019 | | | 2,380,000 | | | | 2,522,800 | |
Jo-Ann Stores Holdings, Inc., 9.75%, 2019 (n)(p) | | | 1,345,000 | | | | 1,398,800 | |
Limited Brands, Inc., 6.9%, 2017 | | | 1,950,000 | | | | 2,203,500 | |
Limited Brands, Inc., 7%, 2020 | | | 1,295,000 | | | | 1,445,544 | |
Limited Brands, Inc., 6.95%, 2033 | | | 720,000 | | | | 720,000 | |
Rite Aid Corp., 9.25%, 2020 | | | 5,010,000 | | | | 5,579,888 | |
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 | | | 1,495,000 | | | | 1,637,025 | |
The Pantry, Inc., 8.375%, 2020 | | | 1,105,000 | | | | 1,193,400 | |
Toys “R” Us Property Co. II LLC, 8.5%, 2017 | | | 1,779,000 | | | | 1,879,069 | |
Toys “R” Us, Inc., 10.75%, 2017 | | | 2,535,000 | | | | 2,680,788 | |
YCC Holdings LLC/Yankee Finance, Inc., 10.25%, 2016 (p) | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 1,371,726 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 29,015,890 | |
Specialty Chemicals - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Chemtura Corp., 5.75%, 2021 | | $ | 740,000 | | | $ | 736,300 | |
Eagle Spinco, Inc., 4.625%, 2021 (n) | | | 525,000 | | | | 504,000 | |
Koppers, Inc., 7.875%, 2019 | | | 1,230,000 | | | | 1,313,025 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,553,325 | |
Specialty Stores - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Michaels Stores, Inc., 11.375%, 2016 | | $ | 360,000 | | | $ | 375,304 | |
Michaels Stores, Inc., 7.75%, 2018 | | | 1,820,000 | | | | 1,972,425 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,347,729 | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - 3.9% | | | | | | | | |
Clearwire Corp., 12%, 2015 (n) | | $ | 2,795,000 | | | $ | 2,962,700 | |
Cricket Communications, Inc., 7.75%, 2020 | | | 1,960,000 | | | | 2,229,500 | |
Crown Castle International Corp., 7.125%, 2019 | | | 2,840,000 | | | | 3,060,100 | |
Crown Castle International Corp., 5.25%, 2023 | | | 1,890,000 | | | | 1,819,125 | |
56
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - continued | | | | | | | | |
Digicel Group Ltd., 8.25%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 2,420,000 | | | $ | 2,522,850 | |
Digicel Group Ltd., 10.5%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,290,000 | | | | 2,484,650 | |
Eileme 2 AB, 11.625%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,220,000 | | | | 1,427,400 | |
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 7.875%, 2018 | | | 2,940,000 | | | | 3,189,900 | |
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 6.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,325,000 | | | | 1,351,500 | |
Sprint Capital Corp., 6.875%, 2028 | | | 2,890,000 | | | | 2,658,800 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 6%, 2016 | | | 3,395,000 | | | | 3,607,188 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 8.375%, 2017 | | | 2,549,000 | | | | 2,880,370 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 9%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,400,000 | | | | 1,659,000 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 6%, 2022 | | | 3,210,000 | | | | 3,089,625 | |
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 11.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 3,685,000 | | | | 3,887,675 | |
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 7.25%, 2018 (n) | | | 3,730,000 | | | | 3,841,900 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 42,672,283 | |
Telephone Services - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Cogent Communications Group, Inc., 8.375%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 965,000 | | | $ | 1,054,263 | |
Level 3 Financing, Inc., 9.375%, 2019 | | | 1,990,000 | | | | 2,208,900 | |
Level 3 Financing, Inc., 8.625%, 2020 | | | 1,320,000 | | | | 1,452,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,715,163 | |
Transportation - Services - 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
Aguila 3 S.A., 7.875%, 2018 (z) | | $ | 755,000 | | | $ | 781,425 | |
Aguila American Resources Ltd., 7.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,275,000 | | | | 2,354,625 | |
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC, 8.25%, 2019 | | | 1,655,000 | | | | 1,808,088 | |
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC, 9.75%, 2020 | | | 945,000 | | | | 1,102,106 | |
CEVA Group PLC, 8.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 5,350,000 | | | | 5,376,750 | |
Navios Maritime Acquisition Corp., 8.625%, 2017 | | | 3,680,000 | | | | 3,827,200 | |
Navios Maritime Holdings, Inc., 8.875%, 2017 | | | 1,069,000 | | | | 1,121,114 | |
Navios South American Logistics, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 | | | 1,998,000 | | | | 2,152,845 | |
Navios South American Logistics, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 258,000 | | | | 277,995 | |
Swift Services Holdings, Inc., 10%, 2018 | | | 5,265,000 | | | | 5,883,638 | |
Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Ltd., 8.875%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,262,000 | | | | 1,287,240 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 25,973,026 | |
Utilities - Electric Power - 3.6% | | | | | | | | |
AES Corp., 8%, 2017 | | $ | 287,000 | | | $ | 332,920 | |
AES Corp., 7.375%, 2021 | | | 2,030,000 | | | | 2,293,900 | |
AES Corp., 4.875%, 2023 | | | 235,000 | | | | 223,250 | |
Calpine Corp., 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,840,000 | | | | 3,081,400 | |
Covanta Holding Corp., 7.25%, 2020 | | | 3,570,000 | | | | 3,859,645 | |
Covanta Holding Corp., 6.375%, 2022 | | | 725,000 | | | | 745,934 | |
EDP Finance B.V., 6%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,675,000 | | | | 2,773,387 | |
Energy Future Holdings Corp., 10%, 2020 | | | 10,607,000 | | | | 11,482,078 | |
57
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Utilities - Electric Power - continued | | | | | | | | |
Energy Future Holdings Corp., 10%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 2,580,000 | | | $ | 2,786,400 | |
Energy Future Holdings Corp., 12.25%, 2022 (n) | | | 2,555,000 | | | | 2,842,438 | |
InterGen N.V., 7%, 2023 (z) | | | 2,105,000 | | | | 2,099,738 | |
NRG Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 5,025,000 | | | | 5,577,750 | |
NRG Energy, Inc., 6.625%, 2023 | | | 475,000 | | | | 486,875 | |
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC, 11.5%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,080,000 | | | | 810,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 39,395,715 | |
Utilities - Gas - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Suburban Propane Partners LP, 7.5%, 2018 | | $ | 505,000 | | | $ | 545,400 | |
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $1,001,946,647) | | | | | | $ | 1,027,221,796 | |
| | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
Aerospace - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
TransDigm, Inc., Term Loan C, 3.75%, 2020 | | $ | 1,461,586 | | | $ | 1,468,480 | |
| | |
Building - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
ABC Supply Co., Inc., Term Loan B, 3.5%, 2020 | | $ | 465,118 | | | $ | 465,201 | |
| | |
Conglomerates - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Silver II U.S. Holdings LLC, Term Loan B, 4%, 2019 | | $ | 977,929 | | | $ | 976,699 | |
| | |
Consumer Services - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Realogy Corp., Term Loan B, 4.5%, 2020 | | $ | 871,693 | | | $ | 878,776 | |
| | |
Energy - Independent - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
MEG Energy Corp., Term Loan B, 3.75%, 2020 | | $ | 1,436,991 | | | $ | 1,443,727 | |
| | |
Entertainment - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Cedar Fair LP, Term Loan B, 3.25%, 2020 | | $ | 1,089,617 | | | $ | 1,095,065 | |
| | |
Food & Beverages - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Aramark Corp., Term Loan D, 4%, 2019 | | $ | 1,469,080 | | | $ | 1,481,935 | |
H.J. Heinz Co., Term Loan B2, 3.5%, 2020 | | | 702,914 | | | | 709,065 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,191,000 | |
Retailers - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Rite Aid Corp., Term Loan, 4.87%, 2021 | | $ | 937,940 | | | $ | 943,802 | |
Toys ‘‘R’’ Us, Inc., Term Loan B, 2019 (o) | | | 1,940,340 | | | | 1,920,937 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,864,739 | |
58
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - continued | | | | | | | | |
Transportation - Services - 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
American Commercial Lines, Inc, Term Loan, 7.5%, 2019 | | $ | 5,306,274 | | | $ | 5,014,429 | |
| | |
Utilities - Electric Power - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Calpine Construction Finance Co., Term Loan B, 3%, 2020 | | $ | 2,646,162 | | | $ | 2,623,339 | |
Total Floating Rate Loans (Identified Cost, $19,168,565) | | | $ | 19,021,455 | |
| | |
Common Stocks - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Automotive - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Accuride Corp. (a) | | | 48,891 | | | $ | 279,657 | |
| | |
Energy - Independent - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (a) | | | 490 | | | $ | 2,656 | |
Total Common Stocks (Identified Cost, $712,172) | | | | | | $ | 282,313 | |
| | |
Convertible Preferred Stocks - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Automotive - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
General Motors Co., 4.75% (Identified Cost, $1,623,484) | | | 34,840 | | | $ | 1,739,910 | |
| | |
Convertible Bonds - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Network & Telecom - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Nortel Networks Corp., 2.125%, 2014 (a)(d) (Identified Cost, $1,784,200) | | $ | 1,805,000 | | | $ | 1,773,413 | |
| | |
Preferred Stocks - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 7% (z) | | | 1,639 | | | $ | 1,623,532 | |
GMAC Capital Trust I, 8.125% | | | 83,650 | | | | 2,220,908 | |
Total Preferred Stocks (Identified Cost, $3,651,909) | | | | | | $ | 3,844,440 | |
| | |
Issuer/Expiration Date/Strike Price | | Number of Contracts | | | | |
Call Options Purchased - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
iShares Russell 2000 Index - September 2013 @ $106 (Premiums Paid, $340,597) | | | 2,545 | | | $ | 389,385 | |
59
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Money Market Funds - 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.08%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | | | 26,999,688 | | | $ | 26,999,688 | |
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $1,056,227,262) | | | | | | $ | 1,081,272,400 | |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 1.0% | | | | | | | 10,656,605 | |
Net Assets - 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 1,091,929,005 | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(d) | In default. Interest and/or scheduled principal payment(s) have been missed. |
(g) | The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on settled positions at period end, unless otherwise indicated. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $310,948,833, representing 28.5% of net assets. |
(o) | All or a portion of this position has not settled. Upon settlement date, interest rates for unsettled amounts will be determined. The rate shown, if any, represents the weighted average coupon rate for settled amounts. |
(p) | Payment-in-kind security. |
(r) | Remaining maturities of floating rate loans may be less than stated maturities shown as a result of contractual or optional prepayments by the borrower. Such prepayments cannot be predicted with certainty. These loans may be subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans generally have rates of interest which are determined periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Securities | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | | Value | |
Aguila 3 S.A., 7.875%, 2018 | | 7/30/13 | | | $775,763 | | | | $781,425 | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 7% (Preferred Stock) | | 4/13/11-11/27/12 | | | 1,552,313 | | | | 1,623,532 | |
American Media, Inc., 13.5%, 2018 | | 12/22/10-12/28/10 | | | 342,809 | | | | 342,111 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 4.875%, 2022 | | 6/05/13-7/12/13 | | | 774,285 | | | | 768,275 | |
Audatex North America, Inc., 6%, 2021 | | 6/27/13 | | | 1,485,000 | | | | 1,510,988 | |
Boart Longyear Ltd., 7%, 2021 | | 6/04/13 | | | 586,204 | | | | 538,475 | |
Chester Downs & Marina LLC, 9.25%, 2020 | | 6/18/13-6/27/13 | | | 1,442,371 | | | | 1,435,500 | |
Dematic S.A., 7.75%, 2020 | | 12/13/12-7/29/13 | | | 5,188,031 | | | | 5,257,238 | |
Heckler & Koch GmbH, 9.5%, 2018 | | 5/06/11-1/02/13 | | | 2,364,351 | | | | 2,079,325 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 6%, 2020 | | 7/29/13 | | | 1,530,000 | | | | 1,530,000 | |
InterGen N.V., 7%, 2023 | | 6/07/13-7/24/13 | | | 2,090,751 | | | | 2,099,738 | |
60
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Securities - continued | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | | Value | |
LBI Media, Inc., 13.5% to 2015, 11.5% to 2020 | | 12/26/12-5/17/13 | | | $544,531 | | | | $418,634 | |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 | | 11/09/07-2/06/13 | | | 2,427,765 | | | | 2,471,614 | |
Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, 6.25%, 2021 | | 7/23/13 | | | 235,000 | | | | 236,175 | |
NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC, 5%, 2018 | | 7/30/13 | | | 1,307,250 | | | | 1,317,875 | |
NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5.25%, 2023 | | 7/16/13-7/31/13 | | | 1,413,188 | | | | 1,410,000 | |
Nara Cable Funding Ltd., 8.875%, 2018 | | 7/17/13 | | | 900,645 | | | | 882,000 | |
PNK Finance Corp., 6.375%, 2021 | | 7/30/13 | | | 940,000 | | | | 947,050 | |
Pacific Drilling S.A., 5.375%, 2020 | | 6/05/13-6/17/13 | | | 1,822,248 | | | | 1,832,600 | |
Peninsula Gaming LLC, 8.375%, 2018 | | 6/26/13 | | | 639,215 | | | | 665,738 | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC, 4.875%, 2021 | | 6/11/13 | | | 499,242 | | | | 473,438 | |
Quiksilver, Inc., 10%, 2020 | | 7/11/13 | | | 227,153 | | | | 237,475 | |
Renaissance Acquisition, 6.875%, 2021 | | 7/22/13 | | | 2,920,000 | | | | 2,905,400 | |
Summit Midstream Holdings LLC, 7.5%, 2021 | | 6/12/13 | | | 1,255,000 | | | | 1,280,100 | |
Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 2021 | | 7/19/13-7/24/13 | | | 1,205,736 | | | | 1,203,000 | |
Tronox Finance LLC, 6.375%, 2020 | | 7/15/13-7/31/13 | | | 1,392,001 | | | | 1,374,013 | |
Vantage Point Imaging, 7.5%, 2021 | | 6/27/13 | | | 1,560,000 | | | | 1,673,100 | |
Walter Energy Inc., 8.5%, 2021 | | 7/15/13-7/25/13 | | | 1,470,490 | | | | 1,373,125 | |
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | $38,667,944 | |
% of Net assets | | | | | | | | | 3.5% | |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
CLO | | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | | Public Limited Company |
REIT | | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Abbreviations indicate amounts shown in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. All amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. A list of abbreviations is shown below:
See Notes to Financial Statements
61
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2013 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2012 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense
62
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 1st quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile for the one-year period and the 4th quintile for the five-year period ended December 31, 2012 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS currently observes an expense limitation for the Fund, which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each approximately at the Lipper expense group median.
63
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to any comparable institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund may benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund and/or growth in assets of the MFS Funds as a whole. They noted that MFS has agreed in writing to reduce its advisory fee on the Fund’s average daily net assets over $1.5 billion and $2.5 billion, which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also noted that MFS has agreed in writing to waive a portion of the management fees of certain MFS Funds, including the Fund, if the total combined assets of certain funds within the MFS Funds’ complex increase above agreed upon thresholds (the “group fee waiver”), enabling the Fund’s shareholders to share in the benefits from any economies of scale at the complex level. The group fee waiver is reviewed and renewed annually between the Board and MFS. The Trustees concluded that the breakpoints and the group fee waiver were sufficient to allow the Fund to benefit from economies of scale as its assets and overall complex assets grow.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS
64
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2013.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
65
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
FURTHER INFORMATION
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.
PROVISION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS AND SUMMARY PROSPECTUSES
The fund produces financial reports every six months and updates its summary prospectus and prospectus annually. To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, only one copy of the fund’s annual and semiannual report and summary prospectus may be mailed to shareholders having the same last name and residential address on the fund’s records. However, any shareholder may contact MFSC (please see back cover for address and telephone number) to request that copies of these reports and summary prospectuses be sent personally to that shareholder.
66
Save paper with eDelivery.
| MFS® will send you prospectuses, |
reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter.
To sign up:
1. Go to mfs.com.
2. Log in via MFS® Access.
3. Select eDelivery.
If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS® Access, or eDelivery may not be available to you.
CONTACT
WEB SITE
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
ACCOUNT SERVICE AND LITERATURE
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Financial advisors
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
MAILING ADDRESS
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
OVERNIGHT MAIL
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
SEMIANNUAL REPORT
July 31, 2013
MFS® MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND
MMH-SEM
MFS® MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND
CONTENTS
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders.
It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when
preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholders:
The U.S. economy continues to grow, albeit at a modest pace, possibly helping to gently lift other regions out of a prolonged slump. The resilience of the U.S. housing
market and improved jobs picture continues to offset the drag created by the government’s sequestration and rise in taxes. Going forward, much could hinge on how much cooperation and bipartisanship the U.S. Congress can achieve, as yet another fiscal showdown looms later in 2013.
China is shifting gears from being the engine of global growth because of its rapid consumption of commodities. Commodity-exporting countries are feeling the squeeze from China’s economic focus being turned toward domestic consumers and its overall pace of growth slowing. Japan’s recent economic reports indicate that its 15-year period of stagnant
growth and deflation could be ending, while the eurozone is showing signs of a pickup in economic growth after two years of recession. These recent positive signs in Japan and Europe point to a possible broadening base of global growth that could help take the burden off China and the United States as the main engines of global activity.
As always, managing risk in the face of uncertainty remains a top priority for investors. At MFS®, our uniquely collaborative investment process employs integrated, global research and active risk management. Our global team of investment professionals shares ideas and evaluates opportunities across continents, investment disciplines and asset classes — all with a goal of building better insights, and ultimately better results, for our clients.
We are mindful of the many economic challenges investors face, and believe it is more important than ever to maintain a long-term view and employ time-tested principles, such as asset allocation and diversification. We remain confident that our unique approach can serve investors well as they work with their financial advisors to identify and pursue the most suitable opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
September 16, 2013
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio structure (i)
| | | | |
Top five industries (i) | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals | | | 19.3% | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care | | | 12.6% | |
Universities-Colleges | | | 9.0% | |
Tobacco | | | 7.4% | |
Universities-Secondary Schools | | | 6.1% | |
| | | | |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | |
AAA | | | 3.5% | |
AA | | | 6.6% | |
A | | | 12.5% | |
BBB | | | 34.5% | |
BB | | | 12.1% | |
B | | | 11.4% | |
C | | | 0.7% | |
Not Rated | | | 20.5% | |
Cash & Other | | | (1.8)% | |
| |
Portfolio facts (i) | | | | |
Average Duration (d) | | | 10.9 | |
Average Effective Maturity (m) | | | 21.5 yrs. | |
(a) | For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
2
Portfolio Composition – continued
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
From time to time “Cash & Other Net Assets” may be negative due to borrowings for leverage transactions, timing of cash receipts, and/or equivalent exposure from any derivative holdings.
Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio.
Percentages are based on net assets as of 7/31/13.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
EXPENSE TABLE
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period, February 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period February 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
4
Expense Table – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | | | Beginning Account Value 2/01/13 | | | Ending Account Value 7/31/13 | | | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 2/01/13-7/31/13 | |
A | | Actual | | | 0.69% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $935.22 | | | | $3.31 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.69% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.37 | | | | $3.46 | |
B | | Actual | | | 1.50% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $931.56 | | | | $7.18 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.50% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.36 | | | | $7.50 | |
C | | Actual | | | 1.69% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $930.65 | | | | $8.09 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.69% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.41 | | | | $8.45 | |
I | | Actual | | | 0.69% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $935.20 | | | | $3.31 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.69% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.37 | | | | $3.46 | |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid are equal to each class’s annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction cost had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
Expenses Impacting Table
Expense ratios include 0.02% of investment related expenses from inverse floaters that are outside of the expense cap arrangement (See Note 3 of the Notes to Financial Statements).
5
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
7/31/13 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
| | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - 100.4% | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Airport Revenue - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Burlington, VT, Airport Rev., “A”, 4%, 2028 | | $ | 1,565,000 | | | $ | 1,225,057 | |
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Rev., Third Lien, “A”, 5.625%, 2035 | | | 5,645,000 | | | | 5,864,365 | |
Cleveland, OH, Airport System Rev., “A”, AGM, 5%, 2030 | | | 1,360,000 | | | | 1,374,824 | |
Cleveland, OH, Airport System Rev., “A”, AGM, 5%, 2031 | | | 905,000 | | | | 909,272 | |
Houston, TX, Airport System Rev., “B”, 5%, 2026 | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 1,445,364 | |
Port Authority of NY & NJ, Special Obligation Rev. (JFK International Air Terminal LLC), 6%, 2036 | | | 2,435,000 | | | | 2,708,645 | |
Port Authority of NY & NJ, Special Obligation Rev. (JFK International Air Terminal LLC), 6%, 2042 | | | 2,780,000 | | | | 3,061,141 | |
San Jose, CA, Airport Rev., “A-2”, 5.25%, 2034 | | | 6,545,000 | | | | 6,650,964 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 23,239,632 | |
General Obligations - General Purpose - 2.8% | | | | | | | | |
Bellwood, IL, 5.875%, 2027 | | $ | 2,300,000 | | | $ | 2,091,275 | |
Bellwood, IL, 6.15%, 2032 | | | 4,800,000 | | | | 4,287,024 | |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement, “A”, 5%, 2029 | | | 3,075,000 | | | | 2,649,113 | |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement, “B”, 6.5%, 2037 | | | 2,325,000 | | | | 2,275,175 | |
Deaf Smith County, TX, Hospital District, “A”, 6.5%, 2040 | | | 3,800,000 | | | | 4,216,708 | |
Guam Government, “A”, 7%, 2039 | | | 1,115,000 | | | | 1,182,034 | |
Luzerne County, PA, AGM, 6.75%, 2023 | | | 1,225,000 | | | | 1,369,134 | |
Mississippi Development Bank Special Obligation (Greenville, MS Project), 5%, 2027 | | | 1,430,000 | | | | 1,409,051 | |
New Orleans, LA, 5%, 2031 | | | 990,000 | | | | 1,000,227 | |
State of California, 5.25%, 2028 | | | 3,545,000 | | | | 3,842,886 | |
State of California, 5.125%, 2033 | | | 7,845,000 | | | | 8,229,719 | |
State of California, 5%, 2041 | | | 2,580,000 | | | | 2,614,314 | |
State of California (Veterans), 5.05%, 2036 | | | 940,000 | | | | 940,743 | |
State of Illinois, 5%, 2025 | | | 940,000 | | | | 970,917 | |
State of Illinois, 5.5%, 2038 | | | 1,110,000 | | | | 1,128,593 | |
Washington Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax, “B”, NATL, 5%, 2032 (u) | | | 25,010,000 | | | | 26,602,387 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 64,809,300 | |
General Obligations - Schools - 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, 0%, 2031 | | $ | 2,060,000 | | | $ | 822,414 | |
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, 0%, 2032 | | | 2,095,000 | | | | 784,536 | |
6
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
General Obligations - Schools - continued | | | | | | | | |
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, 0%, 2033 | | $ | 4,185,000 | | | $ | 1,470,902 | |
Escondido, CA, Union High School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, “A”, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2030 | | | 4,785,000 | | | | 1,884,764 | |
Escondido, CA, Union High School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, “A”, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2031 | | | 4,280,000 | | | | 1,576,452 | |
Escondido, CA, Union High School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, “A”, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2032 | | | 3,010,000 | | | | 1,035,320 | |
Frisco, TX, Independent School District, School Building, “B”, PSF, 3%, 2042 | | | 700,000 | | | | 494,165 | |
Hartnell, CA, Community College District (Election of 2002), Capital Appreciation, “D”, 0%, 2039 | | | 10,355,000 | | | | 1,893,515 | |
Lake Tahoe, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, AGM, 0%, 2045 | | | 4,240,000 | | | | 1,477,640 | |
Los Angeles, CA, Unified School District, “D”, 5%, 2034 | | | 525,000 | | | | 543,968 | |
Merced, CA, Union High School District, Capital Appreciation, “A”, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2030 | | | 645,000 | | | | 260,006 | |
Newport Mesa, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2005), Capital Appreciation, 0%, 2041 | | | 12,965,000 | | | | 2,258,373 | |
Oceanside, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2024 | | | 3,110,000 | | | | 1,870,603 | |
Oceanside, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2027 | | | 2,070,000 | | | | 1,005,337 | |
Oceanside, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2029 | | | 4,025,000 | | | | 1,690,460 | |
Oceanside, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2030 | | | 4,455,000 | | | | 1,740,346 | |
Royse City, TX, Independent School District, School Building, Capital Appreciation, PSF, 0%, 2027 | | | 2,960,000 | | | | 1,526,827 | |
Royse City, TX, Independent School District, School Building, Capital Appreciation, PSF, 0%, 2029 | | | 2,995,000 | | | | 1,380,485 | |
West Contra Costa, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2005), Capital Appreciation, “C”, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2029 | | | 3,665,000 | | | | 1,532,117 | |
Whittier, CA, Union High School District, Capital Appreciation, 0%, 2034 | | | 2,270,000 | | | | 663,566 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 25,911,796 | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - 19.0% | | | | | | | | |
Alexander City, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority Medical Facilities Rev., “A” (Russell Hospital Corp.), 5.75%, 2036 | | $ | 1,900,000 | | | $ | 1,868,688 | |
Atchison, KS, Hospital Rev. (Atchison Hospital Assn.), “A”, 6.75%, 2030 | | | 2,600,000 | | | | 2,781,428 | |
Athens County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (O’Bleness Memorial Hospital), “A”, 7.125%, 2033 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,500,725 | |
7
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | | | |
Brazoria County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Hospital Rev. (Brazosport Regional Health System), 5.25%, 2032 | | $ | 2,000,000 | | | $ | 1,892,140 | |
Brazoria County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Hospital Rev. (Brazosport Regional Health System), 5.5%, 2042 | | | 9,910,000 | | | | 9,481,591 | |
Brunswick, GA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital), 5.625%, 2034 | | | 1,375,000 | | | | 1,446,569 | |
Butler County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (UC Health), 5.5%, 2040 | | | 5,435,000 | | | | 5,469,947 | |
Butler County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (UC Health), 5.75%, 2040 | | | 2,210,000 | | | | 2,256,963 | |
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (St. Joseph Health System), “A”, 5.75%, 2039 | | | 2,765,000 | | | | 2,997,509 | |
Chautauqua County, NY, Capital Resource Corp. Rev. (Women’s Christian Assn.), “A”, 8%, 2030 | | | 3,890,000 | | | | 4,056,842 | |
Citrus County, FL, Hospital Board Rev. (Citrus Memorial Hospital), 6.375%, 2032 | | | 5,810,000 | | | | 5,465,990 | |
Citrus County, FL, Hospital Rev. (Citrus Memorial Hospital), 6.25%, 2023 | | | 3,140,000 | | | | 3,089,540 | |
Cullman County, AL, Health Care Authority (Cullman Regional Medical Center), “A”, 6.25%, 2023 | | | 1,400,000 | | | | 1,453,186 | |
Cullman County, AL, Health Care Authority (Cullman Regional Medical Center), “A”, 6.75%, 2029 | | | 4,790,000 | | | | 4,942,322 | |
Cullman County, AL, Health Care Authority (Cullman Regional Medical Center), “A”, 7%, 2036 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,039,550 | |
DeKalb County, GA, Hospital Authority Rev. (DeKalb Medical Center, Inc.), 6.125%, 2040 | | | 7,170,000 | | | | 7,476,159 | |
Duluth, MN, Economic Development Authority Health Care Facilities Rev. (St. Luke’s Hospital Authority Obligated Group), 5.75%, 2027 | | | 2,325,000 | | | | 2,349,738 | |
Duluth, MN, Economic Development Authority Health Care Facilities Rev. (St. Luke’s Hospital Authority Obligated Group), 5.75%, 2032 | | | 5,025,000 | | | | 5,031,482 | |
Duluth, MN, Economic Development Authority Health Care Facilities Rev. (St. Luke’s Hospital Authority Obligated Group), 6%, 2039 | | | 5,780,000 | | | | 5,854,735 | |
Escambia County, FL, Health Facilities Authority (Baptist Hospital, Inc.), “A”, 6%, 2036 | | | 3,050,000 | | | | 3,193,869 | |
Fruita, CO, Rev. (Family Health West Project), 7%, 2018 | | | 850,000 | | | | 940,092 | |
Fruita, CO, Rev. (Family Health West Project), 8%, 2043 | | | 4,440,000 | | | | 4,876,674 | |
Gallia County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Holzer Health Systems), “A”, 8%, 2042 | | | 16,000,000 | | | | 17,254,240 | |
Glasgow, KY, Healthcare Rev. (TJ Samson Community Hospital), 6.375%, 2035 | | | 2,840,000 | | | | 3,063,565 | |
8
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | | | |
Grundy County, MO, Industrial Development Authority, Health Facilities Rev. (Wright Memorial Hospital), 6.75%, 2034 | | $ | 1,590,000 | | | $ | 1,686,290 | |
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Medical Facilities Rev. (Baylor College of Medicine), “D”, 5.625%, 2032 | | | 4,535,000 | | | | 4,868,821 | |
Harris County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Hospital Rev. (Memorial Hermann Healthcare Systems), “B”, 7.25%, 2018 (c) | | | 2,400,000 | | | | 3,116,160 | |
Hillsborough County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (University Community Hospital), “A”, 5.625%, 2018 (c) | | | 4,700,000 | | | | 5,670,926 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Kewanee Hospital), 5.1%, 2031 | | | 3,695,000 | | | | 3,768,567 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (KishHealth Systems Obligated Group), 5.75%, 2028 | | | 3,770,000 | | | | 3,975,578 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (O.S.F. Healthcare Systems) “A”, 7%, 2029 | | | 3,025,000 | | | | 3,463,625 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (O.S.F. Healthcare Systems) “A”, 7.125%, 2037 | | | 2,555,000 | | | | 2,903,783 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Provena Health), “A”, 6%, 2028 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,345,120 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Provena Health), “A”, 7.75%, 2034 | | | 3,865,000 | | | | 4,668,959 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago), “A”, 6%, 2043 | | | 1,305,000 | | | | 1,350,218 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Resurrection Health), 6.125%, 2025 | | | 2,620,000 | | | | 2,886,035 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers), 6.875%, 2038 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,622,115 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers), 7%, 2044 | | | 2,545,000 | | | | 2,761,605 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers), “A”, 5.5%, 2030 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,066,560 | |
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Clarian Health), “A”, 5%, 2039 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 1,985,700 | |
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Clarian Health), “B”, 5%, 2033 | | | 2,510,000 | | | | 2,524,156 | |
Iron River, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Iron County Community Hospital, Inc.), 6.5%, 2040 | | | 2,250,000 | | | | 2,255,198 | |
Jefferson Parish, LA, Hospital Service District No. 1 (West Jefferson Medical Center), “A”, 6%, 2039 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,571,955 | |
Jefferson Parish, LA, Hospital Service District No. 2 (East Jefferson General Hospital), 6.25%, 2031 | | | 3,200,000 | | | | 3,364,544 | |
Jefferson Parish, LA, Hospital Service District No. 2 (East Jefferson General Hospital), 6.375%, 2041 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,114,520 | |
Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board, Hospital Rev. (Mountain States Health Alliance), 6%, 2038 | | | 1,700,000 | | | | 1,785,000 | |
9
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | | | |
Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board, Hospital Rev. (Mountain States Health Alliance), “A”, 5.5%, 2036 | | $ | 3,905,000 | | | $ | 3,932,882 | |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Baptist Healthcare System), “A”, 5.625%, 2027 | | | 815,000 | | | | 887,926 | |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Owensboro Medical Health System), “A”, 6%, 2030 | | | 710,000 | | | | 738,492 | |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Owensboro Medical Health System), “A”, 6.375%, 2040 | | | 5,030,000 | | | | 5,362,382 | |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Owensboro Medical Health System), “A”, 6.5%, 2045 | | | 1,955,000 | | | | 2,091,127 | |
Knox County, IN, Economic Development Rev. (Good Samaritan Hospital), “A”, 5%, 2037 | | | 520,000 | | | | 498,394 | |
Knox County, IN, Economic Development Rev. (Good Samaritan Hospital), “A”, 5%, 2042 | | | 1,030,000 | | | | 961,680 | |
Knox County, TN, Health, Educational, Hospital & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Covenant Health), Capital Appreciation, “A”, 0%, 2035 | | | 3,795,000 | | | | 1,073,795 | |
Lake County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Lake Hospital), “C”, 6%, 2043 | | | 2,870,000 | | | | 2,979,376 | |
Lebanon County, PA, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Good Samaritan Hospital), 5.9%, 2028 | | | 1,890,000 | | | | 1,774,011 | |
Lebanon County, PA, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Good Samaritan Hospital), 6%, 2035 | | | 5,500,000 | | | | 4,992,295 | |
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Lake Charles Memorial Hospital), 6.375%, 2034 | | | 5,470,000 | | | | 5,362,022 | |
Louisville & Jefferson County, KY, Metropolitan Government Healthcare Systems Rev. (Norton Healthcare, Inc.), 5.25%, 2036 | | | 6,485,000 | | | | 6,511,264 | |
Lufkin, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Memorial Health System), 5.5%, 2032 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,006,980 | |
Lufkin, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Memorial Health System), 5.5%, 2037 | | | 6,400,000 | | | | 6,399,872 | |
Lufkin, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Memorial Health System), 6.25%, 2037 | | | 4,340,000 | | | | 4,522,584 | |
Martin County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Martin Memorial Medical Center), 5.5%, 2042 | | | 2,760,000 | | | | 2,732,014 | |
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Doctors Community Hospital), 5.75%, 2038 | | | 2,575,000 | | | | 2,528,058 | |
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Mercy Medical Center), “A”, 5.5%, 2042 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,066,480 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Hospital Rev. (Cape Cod Healthcare Obligated Group), 5.25%, 2041 | | | 720,000 | | | | 703,354 | |
10
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Jordan Hospital), “D”, 5.25%, 2018 | | $ | 4,185,000 | | | $ | 4,192,617 | |
Mecosta County, MI, General Hospital Rev., 6%, 2018 | | | 745,000 | | | | 745,544 | |
Miami Beach, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Mount Sinai Medical Center), 6.75%, 2021 | | | 1,235,000 | | | | 1,289,068 | |
Miami Beach, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Mount Sinai Medical Center), 6.75%, 2014 (c) | | | 338,500 | | | | 366,413 | |
Miami Beach, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Mount Sinai Medical Center), 6.75%, 2029 | | | 2,151,500 | | | | 2,233,601 | |
Miami-Dade County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Miami Childrens Hospital), 6%, 2046 | | | 7,250,000 | | | | 7,644,545 | |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Henry Ford Health System), 5.625%, 2029 | | | 765,000 | | | | 815,429 | |
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Henry Ford Health System), 5.75%, 2039 | | | 4,405,000 | | | | 4,587,984 | |
Monroe County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.), 5.375%, 2026 | | | 3,200,000 | | | | 3,322,208 | |
Monroe County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.), 5.5%, 2035 | | | 3,340,000 | | | | 3,447,014 | |
Monroe County, PA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Pocono Medical Center), “A”, 5%, 2032 | | | 540,000 | | | | 537,403 | |
Monroe County, PA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Pocono Medical Center), “A”, 5%, 2041 | | | 385,000 | | | | 363,082 | |
Montgomery, AL, Medical Clinic Board Health Care Facility Rev. (Jackson Hospital & Clinic), 5.25%, 2031 | | | 2,745,000 | | | | 2,748,816 | |
Muskingum County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Genesis Health System Obligated Group), 5%, 2033 | | | 3,400,000 | | | | 3,088,220 | |
Muskingum County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Genesis Health System Obligated Group), 5%, 2044 | | | 8,165,000 | | | | 6,977,482 | |
Muskingum County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Genesis Health System Obligated Group), 5%, 2048 | | | 3,400,000 | | | | 2,872,354 | |
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority Rev. (Elliot Hospital Obligated Group), “A”, 6%, 2027 | | | 4,935,000 | | | | 5,241,612 | |
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority Rev. (Huggins Hospital), 6.875%, 2039 | | | 845,000 | | | | 882,053 | |
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Memorial Hospital at Conway), 5.25%, 2036 | | | 585,000 | | | | 536,229 | |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (St. Joseph’s Healthcare System), 6.625%, 2038 | | | 8,000,000 | | | | 8,473,360 | |
New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council, Hospital Rev. (Rehoboth McKinley Christian Hospital), “A”, 5%, 2017 | | | 300,000 | | | | 296,022 | |
New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council, Hospital Rev. (Rehoboth McKinley Christian Hospital), “A”, 5.25%, 2026 | | | 1,580,000 | | | | 1,366,826 | |
11
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | | | |
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center), LOC, 6.5%, 2030 | | $ | 1,570,000 | | | $ | 1,744,019 | |
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center), LOC, 6.25%, 2035 | | | 975,000 | | | | 1,053,712 | |
Norman, OK, Regional Hospital Authority Rev., 5%, 2027 | | | 1,350,000 | | | | 1,358,343 | |
Norman, OK, Regional Hospital Authority Rev., 5.375%, 2029 | | | 795,000 | | | | 802,235 | |
Norman, OK, Regional Hospital Authority Rev., 5.375%, 2036 | | | 6,240,000 | | | | 6,244,118 | |
Norman, OK, Regional Hospital Authority Rev., 5.125%, 2037 | | | 3,735,000 | | | | 3,621,830 | |
Northampton County, PA, General Purpose Authority Hospital Rev. (St. Luke’s Hospital), “A”, 5.5%, 2040 | | | 1,075,000 | | | | 1,091,458 | |
Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission (University Hospital Health System), “A”, 6.75%, 2015 (c) | | | 5,390,000 | | | | 5,884,101 | |
Palomar Pomerado Health Care District, CA, COP, 6.75%, 2039 | | | 4,080,000 | | | | 4,332,552 | |
Philadelphia, PA, Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Temple University Health System), “A”, 5.625%, 2042 | | | 4,700,000 | | | | 4,111,607 | |
Richmond, IN, Hospital Authority Rev. (Reid Hospital & Health Center Services), “A”, 6.625%, 2039 | | | 4,760,000 | | | | 5,119,808 | |
Royal Oak, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (William Beaumont Hospital), 8.25%, 2039 | | | 6,945,000 | | | | 8,358,308 | |
Salida, CO, Hospital District Rev., 5.25%, 2036 | | | 6,014,000 | | | | 5,697,543 | |
San Buenaventura, CA, Rev. (Community Memorial Health System), 7.5%, 2041 | | | 6,000,000 | | | | 6,783,540 | |
Scioto County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Southern Ohio Medical Center), 5.625%, 2031 | | | 1,370,000 | | | | 1,405,963 | |
Scioto County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Southern Ohio Medical Center), 5.75%, 2038 | | | 4,100,000 | | | | 4,216,481 | |
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 6%, 2023 | | | 795,000 | | | | 809,684 | |
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 5.5%, 2030 | | | 2,750,000 | | | | 2,797,053 | |
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 5.75%, 2032 | | | 2,205,000 | | | | 2,247,799 | |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority, Hospital Rev. (Palmetto Health), 5.75%, 2039 | | | 940,000 | | | | 999,558 | |
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District Rev. (South Lake Hospital), “A”, 6%, 2029 | | | 1,155,000 | | | | 1,250,160 | |
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District Rev. (South Lake Hospital), “A”, 6.25%, 2039 | | | 1,715,000 | | | | 1,856,162 | |
Southeastern Ohio Port Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Memorial Health System), 5.75%, 2032 | | | 3,725,000 | | | | 3,800,059 | |
Southeastern Ohio Port Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Memorial Health System), 6%, 2042 | | | 3,830,000 | | | | 3,920,197 | |
St. Louis County, MO, Industrial Development Authority, Health Facilities Rev. (Ranken Jordan Project), 5%, 2027 | | | 1,350,000 | | | | 1,255,905 | |
12
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | | | |
St. Louis County, MO, Industrial Development Authority, Health Facilities Rev. (Ranken Jordan Project), 5%, 2035 | | $ | 1,300,000 | | | $ | 1,150,006 | |
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Wellmont Health Systems Project), RADIAN, 5%, 2017 | | | 2,155,000 | | | | 2,157,414 | |
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Wellmont Health Systems Project), “C”, 5.25%, 2036 | | | 4,965,000 | | | | 4,835,265 | |
Sumner County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Sumner Regional Health Systems, Inc.), “A”, 5.5%, 2022 (a)(d) | | | 685,000 | | | | 1,706 | |
Sumner County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Sumner Regional Health Systems, Inc.), “A”, 5.5%, 2046 (a)(d) | | | 7,415,000 | | | | 18,463 | |
Sweetwater County, WY, Hospital Rev. (Memorial Hospital Project), “A”, 5%, 2037 | | | 3,740,000 | | | | 3,593,168 | |
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. (East Texas Medical Center), “A”, 5.25%, 2032 | | | 3,515,000 | | | | 3,601,821 | |
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. (East Texas Medical Center), “A”, 5.375%, 2037 | | | 2,885,000 | | | | 2,921,236 | |
Upland, CA, COP (San Antonio Community Hospital), 6.375%, 2032 | | | 600,000 | | | | 667,758 | |
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Central Washington Health Services), 6.75%, 2029 | | | 1,550,000 | | | | 1,725,631 | |
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Central Washington Health Services), 7%, 2039 | | | 3,665,000 | | | | 4,010,170 | |
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Highline Medical Center), FHA, 6.25%, 2036 | | | 5,670,000 | | | | 6,180,243 | |
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Virginia Mason Medical Center), “A”, 6.25%, 2042 | | | 5,075,000 | | | | 5,347,223 | |
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Virginia Mason Medical Center), “B”, ACA, 5.75%, 2037 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,036,990 | |
West Contra Costa, CA, Healthcare District, AMBAC, 5.5%, 2029 | | | 700,000 | | | | 703,024 | |
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Thomas Health System), 6.5%, 2038 | | | 3,450,000 | | | | 3,382,656 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Aurora Health Care, Inc.), 6.875%, 2030 | | | 2,250,000 | | | | 2,255,850 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Howard Young Health Care, Inc.), 5%, 2027 | | | 5,215,000 | | | | 5,173,436 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Howard Young Health Care, Inc.), 5%, 2030 | | | 2,375,000 | | | | 2,298,288 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Meritor Hospital), “A”, 5.5%, 2031 | | | 1,855,000 | | | | 1,929,460 | |
13
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | | | | | | | | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Meritor Hospital), “A”, 6%, 2041 | | $ | 1,405,000 | | | $ | 1,485,816 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Sauk-Praire Memorial Hospital), 5.25%, 2043 | | | 4,695,000 | | | | 4,157,798 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Sauk-Praire Memorial Hospital), “A”, 5.125%, 2038 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 2,668,860 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare), 5.25%, 2031 | | | 1,570,000 | | | | 1,555,540 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Services), 5.25%, 2034 | | | 4,155,000 | | | | 4,066,914 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 434,378,780 | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - 12.5% | | | | | | | | |
ABAG Finance Authority for Non-Profit Corps., CA, Rev. (Episcopal Senior Communities), 6.125%, 2041 | | $ | 4,000,000 | | | $ | 4,239,760 | |
Abilene, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Sears Methodist Centers, Inc.), “A”, 7%, 2033 (c) | | | 660,000 | | | | 679,153 | |
Alachua County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, Continuing Care Rev. (Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc.), “A”, 8%, 2032 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,427,100 | |
Alachua County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, Continuing Care Rev. (Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc.), “A”, 8%, 2042 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,263,740 | |
Alachua County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, Continuing Care Rev. (Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc.), “A”, 8%, 2046 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,122,900 | |
Arizona Health Facilities Authority Rev. (The Terraces Project), 7.75%, 2013 (c) | | | 2,250,000 | | | | 2,319,368 | |
Bell County, TX, Health Facility Development Corp. (Advanced Living Technologies, Inc.), 8%, 2036 (a)(d) | | | 4,650,000 | | | | 46,500 | |
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Retirement Community Rev. (Ann’s Choice, Inc.), “A”, 6.125%, 2025 | | | 1,320,000 | | | | 1,334,705 | |
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Retirement Community Rev. (Ann’s Choice, Inc.), “A”, 6.25%, 2035 | | | 2,590,000 | | | | 2,615,460 | |
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lutheran Community Telford Center), 5.75%, 2027 | | | 620,000 | | | | 605,821 | |
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lutheran Community Telford Center), 5.75%, 2037 | | | 800,000 | | | | 733,672 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (American Baptist Homes of the West), 6.25%, 2039 | | | 2,985,000 | | | | 3,203,233 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Eskaton Properties, Inc.), 5.25%, 2034 | | | 2,850,000 | | | | 2,831,703 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Southern California Presbyterian Homes), 7%, 2029 | | | 1,400,000 | | | | 1,552,306 | |
14
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | | | | | | | | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Southern California Presbyterian Homes), 7.25%, 2041 | | $ | 560,000 | | | $ | 613,855 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (The Terraces at San Joaquin Gardens), “A”, 5.625%, 2032 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 977,570 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (The Terraces at San Joaquin Gardens), “A”, 6%, 2042 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,003,400 | |
Carmel, IN, Rev. (Barrington of Carmel Project), “A”, 7.125%, 2042 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,047,310 | |
Carmel, IN, Rev. (Barrington of Carmel Project), “A”, 7.125%, 2047 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,047,310 | |
Chartiers Valley, PA, Industrial & Commercial Development Authority (Asbury Health Center Project), 5.75%, 2022 | | | 500,000 | | | | 499,955 | |
Chester County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (RHA Nursing Home), 8.5%, 2032 | | | 850,000 | | | | 779,144 | |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (American Baptist Homes), “A”, 5.9%, 2037 | | | 2,730,000 | | | | 2,495,302 | |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Christian Living Communities Project), 5.125%, 2030 | | | 550,000 | | | | 515,262 | |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Christian Living Communities Project), 6.375%, 2041 | | | 1,620,000 | | | | 1,687,732 | |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Christian Living Communities Project), “A”, 5.75%, 2037 | | | 2,650,000 | | | | 2,650,636 | |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2033 | | | 4,295,000 | | | | 4,074,108 | |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Total Longterm Care, Inc.),“A”, 6%, 2030 | | | 700,000 | | | | 731,780 | |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Total Longterm Care, Inc.),“A”, 6.25%, 2040 | | | 1,150,000 | | | | 1,197,541 | |
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Asbury Atlantic, Inc.), 6%, 2030 | | | 1,035,000 | | | | 1,068,751 | |
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Asbury Atlantic, Inc.), 6%, 2040 | | | 2,495,000 | | | | 2,562,789 | |
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Asbury Atlantic, Inc.), 5.25%, 2041 | | | 965,000 | | | | 875,380 | |
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Asbury Atlantic, Inc.), 6.125%, 2045 | | | 7,220,000 | | | | 7,456,455 | |
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries), 6.125%, 2029 | | | 905,000 | | | | 961,454 | |
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries), 6.35%, 2029 | | | 435,000 | | | | 437,649 | |
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries), 6.375%, 2039 | | | 7,060,000 | | | | 7,466,585 | |
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries), 6.5%, 2039 | | | 325,000 | | | | 326,716 | |
15
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | | | | | | | | |
Fulton County, GA, Residential Care Facilities, Elderly Authority Rev. (Canterbury Court), “A”, 6.125%, 2034 | | $ | 1,020,000 | | | $ | 1,026,242 | |
Georgia Medical Center Hospital Authority Rev. (Spring Harbor Green Island Project), 5.25%, 2037 | | | 4,610,000 | | | | 4,026,051 | |
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Rev. (15 Craigside Project), “A”, 8.75%, 2029 | | | 415,000 | | | | 465,842 | |
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Rev. (15 Craigside Project), “A”, 9%, 2044 | | | 1,190,000 | | | | 1,341,166 | |
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Rev. (Kahala Nui Senior Living Community), 8%, 2013 (c) | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,666,192 | |
Huntsville-Redstone Village, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority (Redstone Village Project), 5.5%, 2028 | | | 1,795,000 | | | | 1,653,841 | |
Huntsville-Redstone Village, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority (Redstone Village Project), 5.5%, 2043 | | | 1,560,000 | | | | 1,329,526 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Christian Homes, Inc.), 6.125%, 2027 | | | 4,150,000 | | | | 4,410,330 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Evangelical Retirement Homes of Greater Chicago, Inc.), 7.25%, 2045 | | | 3,600,000 | | | | 3,774,780 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), “A”, 5.5%, 2027 | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,595,264 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), “A”, 4.75%, 2033 | | | 2,685,000 | | | | 2,304,697 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), “A”, 5.5%, 2037 | | | 8,015,000 | | | | 7,577,862 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), “A”, 5.125%, 2043 | | | 3,410,000 | | | | 2,902,183 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Friendship Village), “A”, 5.375%, 2025 | | | 4,630,000 | | | | 4,633,611 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Lutheran Home & Services), 5.625%, 2042 | | | 3,110,000 | | | | 2,867,109 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Montgomery Place), “A”, 5.75%, 2038 | | | 1,730,000 | | | | 1,718,530 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Smith Village), “A”, 6.25%, 2035 | | | 2,195,000 | | | | 2,105,729 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (The Clare at Water Tower), “A-6”, 6%, 2028 (a)(d) | | | 1,057,000 | | | | 106 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev., Capital Appreciation, (The Clare at Water Tower), “B”, 0%, 2050 (a) | | | 453,000 | | | | 45 | |
Indiana Finance Authority Rev. (Marquette Project), 4.75%, 2032 | | | 4,790,000 | | | | 4,354,302 | |
Indiana Finance Authority Rev. (Marquette Project), 5%, 2039 | | | 1,215,000 | | | | 1,087,680 | |
Iowa Finance Authority, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Care Initiatives), “A”, 5.5%, 2021 | | | 1,530,000 | | | | 1,587,207 | |
Iowa Finance Authority, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Care Initiatives), “A”, 5.5%, 2025 | | | 2,495,000 | | | | 2,566,931 | |
16
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | | | | | | | | |
James City County, VA, Economic Development Authority, Residential Care Facilities Rev. (Virginia United Methodist Homes of Williamsburg), “A”, 6%, 2043 | | $ | 3,035,712 | | | $ | 2,488,070 | |
James City County, VA, Economic Development Authority, Residential Care Facilities Rev. (Virginia United Methodist Homes of Williamsburg), “A”, 2%, 2048 (a) | | | 981,912 | | | | 26,001 | |
Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board Rev. (Appalachian Christian Village Project), “A”, 5%, 2043 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,193,645 | |
Kalamazoo, MI, Economic Development Corp. Rev. (Heritage Community), 5.375%, 2027 | | | 750,000 | | | | 668,865 | |
Kalamazoo, MI, Economic Development Corp. Rev. (Heritage Community), 5.5%, 2036 | | | 2,550,000 | | | | 2,173,722 | |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority Health Care Rev. (Masonic Homes of Kentucky, Inc.), 5.375%, 2042 | | | 2,335,000 | | | | 2,122,702 | |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority Health Care Rev. (Masonic Homes of Kentucky, Inc.), 5.5%, 2045 | | | 1,325,000 | | | | 1,199,509 | |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority Rev. (Masonic Home Independent Living II), 7.25%, 2041 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,302,340 | |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority Rev. (Masonic Home Independent Living II), 7.375%, 2046 | | | 1,050,000 | | | | 1,159,127 | |
Kentwood, MI, Economic Development Corp. Rev. (Holland Home Obligated Group), 5.625%, 2041 | | | 3,250,000 | | | | 2,953,763 | |
Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Healthcare Facilities Rev. (Shell Point Alliance), “B”, 6.5%, 2031 | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,715,536 | |
Lenexa, KS, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Lakeview Village, Inc.), 5.375%, 2027 | | | 1,185,000 | | | | 1,131,071 | |
Lenexa, KS, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Lakeview Village, Inc.), 7.125%, 2029 | | | 1,555,000 | | | | 1,684,034 | |
Lenexa, KS, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Lakeview Village, Inc.), 5.5%, 2039 | | | 2,325,000 | | | | 2,116,657 | |
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Charlestown Community), 6.25%, 2041 | | | 2,360,000 | | | | 2,531,525 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Adventcare), “A”, 6.75%, 2037 | | | 4,640,000 | | | | 4,742,730 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Linden Ponds, Inc.), “A-1”, 6.25%, 2031 | | | 869,621 | | | | 763,075 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Linden Ponds, Inc.), “A-1”, 6.25%, 2039 | | | 218,601 | | | | 185,426 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Linden Ponds, Inc.), “A-2”, 5.5%, 2046 | | | 58,153 | | | | 42,821 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Linden Ponds, Inc.), Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2056 | | | 289,249 | | | | 1,640 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (North Hill Communities), “A”, 6.25%, 2033 | | | 1,350,000 | | | | 1,316,547 | |
17
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (North Hill Communities), “A”, 6.5%, 2043 | | $ | 2,080,000 | | | $ | 2,033,990 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (The Groves in Lincoln), “A”, 7.75%, 2039 (d) | | | 680,000 | | | | 47,940 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (The Groves in Lincoln), “A”, 7.875%, 2044 (d) | | | 1,010,000 | | | | 71,205 | |
Medford, OR, Hospital Facilities Authority Rev. (Rogue Valley Manor) , 5%, 2042 | | | 2,025,000 | | | | 1,909,413 | |
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Evangelical Homes), 5.25%, 2032 | | | 1,310,000 | | | | 1,172,764 | |
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Evangelical Homes), 5.5%, 2047 | | | 2,400,000 | | | | 2,087,568 | |
Montgomery County, OH, Health Care & Multifamily Housing Rev. (St. Leonard), 6.375%, 2030 | | | 2,235,000 | | | | 2,366,798 | |
Montgomery County, OH, Health Care & Multifamily Housing Rev. (St. Leonard), 6.625%, 2040 | | | 3,230,000 | | | | 3,428,096 | |
Montgomery County, PA, Higher Education & Health Authority Rev. (AHF/Montgomery), 6.875%, 2036 | | | 3,600,000 | | | | 3,610,188 | |
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Whitemarsh Continuing Care), 6.125%, 2028 | | | 1,850,000 | | | | 1,849,094 | |
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Whitemarsh Continuing Care), 6.25%, 2035 | | | 1,490,000 | | | | 1,476,083 | |
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Rivermead), “A”, 6.875%, 2041 | | | 2,625,000 | | | | 2,779,560 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Lions Gate), “A”, 5.75%, 2025 | | | 475,000 | | | | 475,223 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Lions Gate), “A”, 5.875%, 2037 | | | 2,830,000 | | | | 2,634,617 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Seabrook Village, Inc.), 5.25%, 2036 | | | 2,735,000 | | | | 2,607,658 | |
Norfolk, VA, Redevelopment & Housing Authority Rev. (Fort Norfolk Retirement Community), “A”, 6%, 2025 | | | 785,000 | | | | 772,244 | |
Norfolk, VA, Redevelopment & Housing Authority Rev. (Fort Norfolk Retirement Community), “A”, 6.125%, 2035 | | | 3,530,000 | | | | 3,409,486 | |
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Continuing Care Retirement Community Rev. (Inverness Village), 5.75%, 2037 | | | 3,720,000 | | | | 3,458,149 | |
Orange County, NY, Funding Corp. Assisted Living Residence Rev. (The Hamlet at Wallkill Assisted Living Project), 6.5%, 2046 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 2,620,290 | |
Pell City, AL, Special Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (Noland Health Services, Inc.), 5%, 2039 | | | 1,670,000 | | | | 1,583,327 | |
Red River, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Sears Methodist Retirement System, Inc.), 5.4%, 2028 | | | 880,000 | | | | 772,763 | |
18
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | | | | | | | | |
Red River, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Sears Methodist Retirement System, Inc.), “A”, 6.05%, 2046 | | $ | 3,654,000 | | | $ | 3,113,245 | |
Red River, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Sears Methodist Retirement System, Inc.), “C”, 6.25%, 2053 | | | 390,000 | | | | 344,783 | |
Red River, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Sears Methodist Retirement System, Inc.), “D”, 6.05%, 2046 | | | 766,000 | | | | 652,640 | |
Sarasota County, FL, Health Facility Authority Rev. (Sarasota Manatee), 5.75%, 2037 | | | 2,390,000 | | | | 2,128,869 | |
Sarasota County, FL, Health Facility Authority Rev. (Sarasota Manatee), 5.75%, 2045 | | | 395,000 | | | | 338,037 | |
Scott County, IA, Rev. (Christian Retirement Homes, Inc.), 5.25%, 2021 | | | 2,410,000 | | | | 2,433,618 | |
Shelby County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Germantown Village), “A”, 7.25%, 2013 (c) | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,277,488 | |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev. (Woodlands at Furman), “A”, 6%, 2032 | | | 1,311,828 | | | | 861,648 | |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev. (Woodlands at Furman), “A”, 6%, 2047 | | | 2,987,260 | | | | 1,843,349 | |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev. (Woodlands at Furman), Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2047 | | | 562,212 | | | | 9,468 | |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev. (Woodlands at Furman), Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2047 | | | 516,379 | | | | 8,696 | |
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority, Health Facilities Rev. (Lutheran Homes of South Carolina, Inc.), 5.125%, 2048 | | | 805,000 | | | | 682,077 | |
St. John’s County, FL, Industrial Development Authority (Bayview Project), “A”, 5.2%, 2027 | | | 1,590,000 | | | | 1,310,446 | |
St. John’s County, FL, Industrial Development Authority (Bayview Project), “A”, 5.25%, 2041 | | | 2,800,000 | | | | 2,065,392 | |
St. John’s County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Presbyterian Retirement), “A”, 6%, 2045 | | | 7,715,000 | | | | 7,904,866 | |
St. Louis County, MO, Industrial Development Authority, Senior Living Facilities Rev. (Friendship Village Sunset Hills), 5%, 2042 | | | 1,700,000 | | | | 1,494,827 | |
Suffolk County, NY, Industrial Development Agency (Medford Hamlet Assisted Living), 6.375%, 2039 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,324,890 | |
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Air Force Village Foundation, Inc.), 5.75%, 2019 | | | 500,000 | | | | 536,640 | |
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Air Force Village Foundation, Inc.), 6.125%, 2029 | | | 520,000 | | | | 550,280 | |
19
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | | | | | | | | |
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Air Force Village Foundation, Inc.), 5.125%, 2037 | | $ | 835,000 | | | $ | 782,111 | |
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Air Force Village Foundation, Inc.), 6.375%, 2044 | | | 3,515,000 | | | | 3,662,806 | |
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Stayton at Museum Way), 8%, 2028 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,078,830 | |
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Stayton at Museum Way), 8.25%, 2044 | | | 7,500,000 | | | | 8,158,575 | |
Tempe, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Friendship Village), “A”, 6.25%, 2042 | | | 1,675,000 | | | | 1,707,428 | |
Tempe, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Friendship Village), “A”, 6.25%, 2046 | | | 1,275,000 | | | | 1,298,014 | |
Terre Haute, IN, Rev. (Westminster Village), 6%, 2039 | | | 3,600,000 | | | | 3,279,384 | |
Travis County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Westminster Manor Health), 7%, 2030 | | �� | 3,940,000 | | | | 4,415,834 | |
Travis County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Westminster Manor Health), 7.125%, 2040 | | | 3,560,000 | | | | 3,968,652 | |
Travis County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Querencia Barton Creek), 5.5%, 2025 | | | 1,440,000 | | | | 1,464,192 | |
Tulsa County, OK, Industrial Authority, Senior Living Community Rev. (Montereau, Inc.), “A”, 7.25%, 2040 | | | 3,250,000 | | | | 3,449,908 | |
Tulsa County, OK, Industrial Authority, Senior Living Community Rev. (Montereau, Inc.), “A”, 7.25%, 2045 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,703,420 | |
Ulster County, NY, Industrial Development Agency (Woodland Pond), “A”, 6%, 2037 | | | 3,925,000 | | | | 2,579,392 | |
Upper Illinois River Valley Development Authority (Pleasant View Lutheran Home), 7.25%, 2040 | | | 1,080,000 | | | | 1,100,563 | |
Upper Illinois River Valley Development Authority (Pleasant View Lutheran Home), 7.375%, 2045 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,274,050 | |
Westchester County, NY, Local Development Corp. Rev. (Kendal on Hudson), 5%, 2028 | | | 960,000 | | | | 957,024 | |
Wichita, KS, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Presbyterian Manors, Inc.), “A”, 6.375%, 2043 | | | 5,615,000 | | | | 5,493,491 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (American Eagle Nursing Home), 7.15%, 2028 | | | 3,420,000 | | | | 3,505,910 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (St. John’s Community, Inc.), “A”, 7.25%, 2029 | | | 485,000 | | | | 536,449 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (St. John’s Community, Inc.), “A”, 7.625%, 2039 | | | 1,960,000 | | | | 2,162,860 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 284,592,745 | |
20
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare Revenue - Other - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Koyukuk, AK, Tanana Chiefs Conference, Healthcare Facilities Project, 7.75%, 2041 | | $ | 3,315,000 | | | $ | 3,560,211 | |
| | |
Human Services - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (CDF Healthcare), “A”, 7%, 2036 | | $ | 1,535,000 | | | $ | 1,459,524 | |
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (CDF Healthcare), “C”, 7%, 2036 | | | 1,270,000 | | | | 1,207,554 | |
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (Westside Rehab Center Project), “A”, 6.85%, 2036 | | | 6,995,000 | | | | 7,051,380 | |
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority (Wordsworth Academy), 8%, 2024 | | | 2,850,000 | | | | 2,850,257 | |
Osceola County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Community Provider), 7.75%, 2017 | | | 100,000 | | | | 100,375 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,669,090 | |
Industrial Revenue - Airlines - 5.7% | | | | | | | | |
Clayton County, GA, Development Authority Special Facilities Rev. (Delta Airlines, Inc.), “A”, 8.75%, 2029 | | $ | 4,070,000 | | | $ | 4,708,257 | |
Clayton County, GA, Development Authority Special Facilities Rev. (Delta Airlines, Inc.), “B”, 9%, 2035 | | | 1,310,000 | | | | 1,423,394 | |
Denver, CO, City & County Airport Rev. (United Airlines), 5.25%, 2032 | | | 13,545,000 | | | | 12,541,586 | |
Denver, CO, City & County Airport Rev. (United Airlines), 5.75%, 2032 | | | 3,460,000 | | | | 3,373,500 | |
Houston, TX, Airport Systems Rev., Special Facilities (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal E Project), 6.75%, 2021 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,509,500 | |
Houston, TX, Airport Systems Rev., Special Facilities (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal E Project), 7.375%, 2022 | | | 1,100,000 | | | | 1,104,653 | |
Houston, TX, Airport Systems Rev., Special Facilities (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal E Project), 6.75%, 2029 | | | 16,365,000 | | | | 16,175,330 | |
Houston, TX, Airport Systems Rev., Special Facilities (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal E Project), 7%, 2029 | | | 1,830,000 | | | | 1,828,774 | |
Houston, TX, Airport Systems Rev., Special Facilities (Continental Airlines, Inc.), 6.625%, 2038 | | | 5,630,000 | | | | 5,788,710 | |
Los Angeles, CA, Regional Airports Improvement Corp. Lease Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), “C”, 7.5%, 2024 (d) | | | 11,735,000 | | | | 11,688,999 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Rev. (Continental Airlines, Inc.), 4.875%, 2019 | | | 13,725,000 | | | | 13,532,027 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Rev. (Continental Airlines, Inc.), 5.125%, 2023 | | | 5,870,000 | | | | 5,574,035 | |
21
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Industrial Revenue - Airlines - continued | | | | | | | | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Rev. (Continental Airlines, Inc.), 5.25%, 2029 (b) | | $ | 5,770,000 | | | $ | 5,394,431 | |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Special Facility Rev. (American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport Project), 7.625%, 2025 (d) | | | 18,935,000 | | | | 21,079,957 | |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Special Facility Rev. (American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport Project), 7.75%, 2031 (d) | | | 8,045,000 | | | | 8,932,444 | |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Special Facility Rev. (American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport Project), “B”, 8.5%, 2028 (d)(q) | | | 3,125,000 | | | | 3,336,906 | |
Port Seattle, WA, Industrial Development Corp., Special Facilities Rev. (Delta Airlines, Inc.), 5%, 2030 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 3,593,760 | |
Tulsa, OK, Municipal Airport Trust Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), “B”, 5.5%, 2035 | | | 2,205,000 | | | | 1,975,504 | |
Tulsa, OK, Municipal Airport Trust Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), “B”, 5.5%, 2035 | | | 6,615,000 | | | | 5,919,300 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 130,481,067 | |
Industrial Revenue - Chemicals - 1.4% | | | | | | | | |
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District (Dow Chemical Co.), “A”, 5.95%, 2033 | | $ | 8,190,000 | | | $ | 8,574,439 | |
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District (Dow Chemical Co.), “B-2”, 4.95%, 2033 | | | 1,625,000 | | | | 1,667,559 | |
Giles County, VA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Celanese Corp.), 6.45%, 2026 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,000,710 | |
Louisiana Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (Westlake Chemical), 6.75%, 2032 | | | 4,800,000 | | | | 5,056,896 | |
Louisiana Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (Westlake Chemical), “A”, 6.5%, 2029 | | | 2,990,000 | | | | 3,208,091 | |
Louisiana Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (Westlake Chemical), “A-2”, 6.5%, 2035 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,260,320 | |
Port of Bay, TX, City Authority (Hoechst Celanese Corp.), 6.5%, 2026 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,501,775 | |
Red River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (Celanese Project) “A”, 6.45%, 2030 | | | 430,000 | | | | 433,591 | |
Red River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (Celanese Project) “B”, 6.7%, 2030 | | | 5,380,000 | | | | 5,426,107 | |
York County, SC, Industrial Rev. (Hoechst Celanese), 5.7%, 2024 | | | 130,000 | | | | 130,059 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 32,259,547 | |
Industrial Revenue - Environmental Services - 1.6% | | | | | | | | |
Cobb County, GA, Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2033 | | $ | 1,590,000 | | | $ | 1,634,138 | |
22
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Industrial Revenue - Environmental Services - continued | |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority, Solid Waste Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), 5.7%, 2018 | | $ | 540,000 | | | $ | 611,296 | |
Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority (Waste Management, Inc.), 5.2%, 2028 | | | 3,260,000 | | | | 3,253,089 | |
Maine Finance Authority Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.), 6.25%, 2025 (b) | | | 3,985,000 | | | | 4,047,126 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Rev. (Covanta Energy Project), “A”, 4.875%, 2027 | | | 3,585,000 | | | | 3,240,410 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Rev. (Covanta Energy Project), “C”, 5.25%, 2042 | | | 11,780,000 | | | | 10,391,609 | |
Niagara County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Covanta Energy Project), “A”, 5.25%, 2042 | | | 12,055,000 | | | | 10,708,698 | |
Vermont Economic Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.), 4.75%, 2036 (b) | | | 3,275,000 | | | | 3,136,140 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 37,022,506 | |
Industrial Revenue - Other - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Bayonne, NJ, Redevelopment Agency (Royal Caribbean Project), “A”, 5.375%, 2035 | | $ | 2,500,000 | | | $ | 2,266,625 | |
California Statewide Communities, Development Authority Environmental Facilities (Microgy Holdings Project), 9%, 2038 (a)(d) | | | 100,980 | | | | 1,010 | |
Gulf Coast, TX, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (CITGO Petroleum Corp.), 4.875%, 2025 | | | 4,640,000 | | | | 4,492,541 | |
Gulf Coast, TX, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Microgy Holdings Project), 7%, 2036 (a)(d) | | | 746,831 | | | | 7,468 | |
Houston, TX, Industrial Development Corp. (United Parcel Service, Inc.), 6%, 2023 | | | 245,000 | | | | 230,031 | |
Iowa Finance Authority Midwestern Disaster Area Rev. (Iowa Fertilizer Co.), 5%, 2019 | | | 1,455,000 | | | | 1,427,879 | |
Iowa Finance Authority Midwestern Disaster Area Rev. (Iowa Fertilizer Co.), 5.5%, 2022 | | | 2,910,000 | | | | 2,888,844 | |
Iowa Finance Authority Midwestern Disaster Area Rev. (Iowa Fertilizer Co.), 5.25%, 2025 | | | 2,910,000 | | | | 2,740,900 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (GMT Realty LLC), “B”, 6.875%, 2037 | | | 1,570,000 | | | | 1,519,399 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (GMT Realty LLC), “C”, 6.5%, 2015 | | | 810,000 | | | | 810,599 | |
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Rev., Liberty Bonds (IAC/InterActiveCorp), 5%, 2035 | | | 4,880,000 | | | | 4,769,468 | |
Peninsula Ports Authority, VA, Coal Terminal Rev. (Dominion Terminal Associates), 6%, 2033 | | | 530,000 | | | | 532,618 | |
23
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Industrial Revenue - Other - continued | | | | | | | | |
Philadelphia, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Host Marriott LP), 7.75%, 2017 | | $ | 2,000,000 | | | $ | 2,003,720 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 23,691,102 | |
Industrial Revenue - Paper - 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
Butler, AL, Industrial Development Board, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Georgia-Pacific Corp.), 5.75%, 2028 | | $ | 4,010,000 | | | $ | 4,145,217 | |
Cass County, TX, Industrial Development Corp. (International Paper Co.), “A”, 4.625%, 2027 | | | 3,750,000 | | | | 3,601,763 | |
De Soto Parish, LA, Environmental Improvement Rev. (International Paper Co.), 6.35%, 2025 | | | 1,650,000 | | | | 1,655,990 | |
Escambia County, FL, Environmental Improvement Rev. (International Paper Co.), “A”, 4.75%, 2030 | | | 1,940,000 | | | | 1,924,053 | |
Phenix City, AL, Industrial Development Board Environmental Improvement Rev. (MeadWestvaco Coated Board Project), “A”, 4.125%, 2035 | | | 1,785,000 | | | | 1,419,664 | |
Rockdale County, GA, Development Authority Project Rev. (Visy Paper Project), “A”, 6.125%, 2034 | | | 4,835,000 | | | | 4,882,625 | |
Sabine River, LA, Water Facilities Authority Rev. (International Paper Co.), 6.2%, 2025 | | | 2,250,000 | | | | 2,257,920 | |
Selma, AL, Industrial Development Board Rev., Gulf Opportunity Zone (International Paper Co.), “A”, 6.25%, 2033 | | | 6,750,000 | | | | 7,252,875 | |
Selma, AL, Industrial Development Board Rev., Gulf Opportunity Zone (International Paper Co.), “A”, 5.375%, 2035 | | | 1,635,000 | | | | 1,648,505 | |
West Point, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Chesapeake Corp.), “A”, 6.375%, 2019 (a)(d) | | | 769,496 | | | | 77 | |
West Point, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Chesapeake Corp.), “B”, 6.25%, 2019 (a)(d) | | | 6,569,571 | | | | 657 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 28,789,346 | |
Miscellaneous Revenue - Entertainment & Tourism - 1.8% | |
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, CA, Rev., 6%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 1,750,000 | | | $ | 1,750,035 | |
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 6%, 2030 | | | 2,265,000 | | | | 2,552,927 | |
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 6.25%, 2040 | | | 3,580,000 | | | | 4,003,335 | |
Fort Sill Apache Tribe, OK, Economic Development Authority, Gaming Enterprise., “A”, 8.5%, 2026 (n) | | | 2,710,000 | | | | 2,917,207 | |
Harris County, Houston, TX, Sports Authority Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A”, 0%, 2034 | | | 4,580,000 | | | | 1,226,249 | |
Harris County, Houston, TX, Sports Authority Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A”, 0%, 2038 | | | 40,280,000 | | | | 8,709,342 | |
Harris County, Houston, TX, Sports Authority Special Rev., “A”, NATL, 5%, 2025 | | | 6,780,000 | | | | 6,751,185 | |
24
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Miscellaneous Revenue - Entertainment & Tourism - continued | |
Seminole Tribe, FL, Special Obligation Rev., “A”, 5.75%, 2022 (n) | | $ | 4,150,000 | | | $ | 4,418,713 | |
Seminole Tribe, FL, Special Obligation Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2027 (n) | | | 1,840,000 | | | | 1,907,896 | |
Seneca Nation of Indians, NY, Capital Improvements Authority, Special Obligation, 5%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,715,000 | | | | 2,688,936 | |
Seneca Nation of Indians, NY, Capital Improvements Authority, Special Obligation, “A”, 5.25%, 2016 (n) | | | 280,000 | | | | 287,263 | |
St. Louis, MO, Land Clearance Redevelopment Authority, Facilities Improvement Special Rev. (Kiel Opera House), “B”, 7%, 2035 | | | 4,435,000 | | | | 4,390,473 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 41,603,561 | |
Miscellaneous Revenue - Other - 3.3% | |
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2017 | | $ | 845,000 | | | $ | 904,395 | |
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2020 | | | 830,000 | | | | 876,497 | |
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2024 | | | 4,640,000 | | | | 4,758,830 | |
Baker, FL, Correctional Development Corp. (Baker County Detention Center), 7.5%, 2030 | | | 1,560,000 | | | | 1,472,921 | |
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH, Port Authority Rev., 7%, 2040 | | | 1,165,000 | | | | 1,238,104 | |
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH, Port Authority Rev. (Columbia National Group), 5%, 2020 | | | 980,000 | | | | 946,700 | |
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH, Port Authority Rev. (Fairmount), “B”, 5.125%, 2025 | | | 440,000 | | | | 431,847 | |
District of Columbia Rev. (American Society Hematology), 5%, 2036 | | | 540,000 | | | | 539,973 | |
District of Columbia Rev. (American Society Hematology), 5%, 2042 | | | 860,000 | | | | 847,031 | |
Florida Citizens Property Insurance Corp., “A-1”, 5%, 2019 | | | 660,000 | | | | 746,955 | |
Hardeman County, TN, Correctional Facilities Rev., 7.75%, 2017 | | | 2,835,000 | | | | 2,846,680 | |
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Rev. (YMCA Greater Houston Area) , 5%, 2033 | | | 1,385,000 | | | | 1,340,902 | |
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Rev. (YMCA Greater Houston Area), 5%, 2028 | | | 1,030,000 | | | | 1,034,697 | |
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Rev. (YMCA Greater Houston Area), 5%, 2038 | | | 2,065,000 | | | | 1,947,254 | |
Indiana Finance Authority Rev., (Ohio River Bridges East End Crossing Project), “A”, 5%, 2035 | | | 2,095,000 | | | | 2,029,846 | |
Indiana Finance Authority Rev., (Ohio River Bridges East End Crossing Project), “A”, 5%, 2040 | | | 5,350,000 | | | | 5,076,990 | |
Indiana Finance Authority Rev., (Ohio River Bridges East End Crossing Project), “A”, 5%, 2044 | | | 1,480,000 | | | | 1,328,196 | |
Massachusetts Port Authority Facilities Rev. (Conrac Project), “A”, 5.125%, 2041 | | | 340,000 | | | | 349,207 | |
25
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Miscellaneous Revenue - Other - continued | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Kapkowski Road Landfill Project), 5.75%, 2021 | | $ | 200,000 | | | $ | 207,894 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Kapkowski Road Landfill Project), 6.5%, 2028 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,662,255 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Kapkowski Road Landfill Project), 6.5%, 2031 | | | 5,250,000 | | | | 5,812,590 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Kapkowski Road Landfill Project), “B”, 6.5%, 2018 | | | 2,495,000 | | | | 2,683,996 | |
New Orleans, LA, Aviation Board Gulf Opportunity Zone CFC Rev. (Consolidated Rental Car), “A”, 6.25%, 2030 | | | 2,050,000 | | | | 2,319,985 | |
New York Liberty Development Corp., Liberty Rev. (One Bryant Park LLC), 6.375%, 2049 | | | 4,760,000 | | | | 5,182,164 | |
New York Liberty Development Corp., Liberty Rev. (World Trade Center Project), 5%, 2044 | | | 4,680,000 | | | | 4,599,691 | |
Riversouth, OH, Authority Rev. (Lazarus Building), “A”, 5.75%, 2027 | | | 3,975,000 | | | | 3,887,471 | |
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Flats East Development Recovery Zone Facility Bonds), 6.875%, 2040 | | | 440,000 | | | | 467,491 | |
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Seville Project), “A”, 5.1%, 2025 | | | 475,000 | | | | 450,476 | |
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Workforce Policy Board), “F”, 4.875%, 2025 | | | 2,480,000 | | | | 2,346,353 | |
Texas Midwest Public Facility Corp. Rev. (Secure Treatment Facility Project), 9%, 2030 (a)(d) | | | 1,605,000 | | | | 882,750 | |
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, Airport Facilities Rev. (Transportation Infrastructure Properties LLC), “B”, 5.25%, 2028 | | | 2,175,000 | | | | 2,154,947 | |
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, Airport Facilities Rev. (Transportation Infrastructure Properties LLC), “B”, 5%, 2042 | | | 16,755,000 | | | | 15,035,099 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 76,410,187 | |
Multi-Family Housing Revenue - 0.5% | |
Bay County, FL, Housing Finance Authority, Multi-Family Rev. (Andrews Place II Apartments), AGM, 5%, 2035 | | $ | 635,000 | | | $ | 629,082 | |
East Rochester, NY, Housing Authority Rev. (Woodland Village Project), 5.5%, 2033 | | | 600,000 | | | | 562,680 | |
Fairfax County, VA, Economic Development Authority, Senior Living (Lewinsville Retirement Village), “A”, 5.25%, 2032 | | | 1,215,000 | | | | 1,126,548 | |
Indianapolis, IN, Multi-Family Rev. (Cambridge Station Apartments II), FNMA, 5.25%, 2039 (b) | | | 1,345,000 | | | | 1,306,358 | |
Mississippi Home Corp. Rev. (Kirkwood Apartments Project), 6.8%, 2037 (d)(q) | | | 3,760,000 | | | | 2,312,062 | |
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.4%, 2049 (z) | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 1,900,260 | |
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.9%, 2049 (z) | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 1,800,180 | |
26
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Multi-Family Housing Revenue - continued | |
North Charleston, SC, Housing Authority Rev. (Horizon Village), “A”, GNMA, 5.15%, 2048 | | $ | 1,380,000 | | | $ | 1,373,335 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,010,505 | |
Port Revenue - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Maryland Economic Development Corp. Rev. (Port America Chesapeake Terminal Project), “B”, 5.375%, 2025 | | $ | 885,000 | | | $ | 963,588 | |
Maryland Economic Development Corp. Rev. (Port America Chesapeake Terminal Project), “B”, 5.75%, 2035 | | | 1,740,000 | | | | 1,879,252 | |
Port New Orleans, LA, Board of Commissioners Port Facility Rev., “B”, 5%, 2031 | | | 545,000 | | | | 558,816 | |
Port New Orleans, LA, Board of Commissioners Port Facility Rev., “B”, 5%, 2032 | | | 225,000 | | | | 230,528 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,632,184 | |
Sales & Excise Tax Revenue - 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
Chicago, IL, Transit Authority Sales Tax Receipts Rev., 5.25%, 2031 | | $ | 540,000 | | | $ | 563,625 | |
Colorado Regional Transportation District, Private Activity Rev. (Denver Transportation Partners), 6%, 2034 | | | 8,490,000 | | | | 9,396,647 | |
Massachusetts School Building Authority, Dedicated Sales Tax Rev., “B”, 5%, 2032 (u) | | | 12,280,000 | | | | 12,980,574 | |
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, Dedicated State Tax Rev. (McCormick Place), “B”, AGM, 5%, 2050 (u) | | | 20,000,000 | | | | 19,345,400 | |
Poplar Bluff, MO, Regional Transportation Development District, Sales Tax Rev., 4%, 2036 | | | 1,075,000 | | | | 926,564 | |
Poplar Bluff, MO, Regional Transportation Development District, Sales Tax Rev., 4.75%, 2042 | | | 860,000 | | | | 774,628 | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., “A”, 5.5%, 2037 | | | 1,175,000 | | | | 1,110,763 | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., “A”, 5.5%, 2042 | | | 1,635,000 | | | | 1,502,336 | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., “A”, 6%, 2042 | | | 3,695,000 | | | | 3,645,007 | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., “C”, 5.375%, 2038 | | | 645,000 | | | | 596,277 | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A”, 0%, 2033 | | | 2,655,000 | | | | 1,928,380 | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A”, 0%, 2047 | | | 14,305,000 | | | | 1,503,026 | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., Convertible Capital Appreciation, “A”, 0% to 2016, 6.75% to 2032 | | | 4,390,000 | | | | 4,164,398 | |
Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS, Unified Government Special Obligation Rev., Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2021 | | | 4,930,000 | | | | 3,290,627 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 61,728,252 | |
27
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Single Family Housing - Local - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Jefferson County, TX, Housing Finance Corp., Capital Appreciation, NATL, 0%, 2015 | | $ | 261,436 | | | $ | 209,097 | |
Nortex, TX, Housing Finance Corp., Single Family Mortgage Rev., “B”, 5.5%, 2038 | | | 20,000 | | | | 17,447 | |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A”, GNMA, 5.9%, 2035 | | | 335,000 | | | | 348,728 | |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A”, GNMA, 6.25%, 2035 | | | 115,000 | | | | 119,974 | |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-1”, GNMA, 5.75%, 2037 | | | 90,000 | | | | 94,684 | |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-2”, GNMA, 5.75%, 2037 | | | 325,000 | | | | 340,295 | |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-3”, GNMA, 6%, 2035 | | | 380,000 | | | | 401,231 | |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-4”, GNMA, 5.625%, 2036 | | | 370,000 | | | | 383,849 | |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-4”, GNMA, 5.85%, 2037 | | | 490,000 | | | | 495,013 | |
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., “A-5”, GNMA, 5.9%, 2037 | | | 150,000 | | | | 153,846 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,564,164 | |
Single Family Housing - State - 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
California Housing Finance Agency Rev. (Home Mortgage), “E”, 4.75%, 2030 | | $ | 2,560,000 | | | $ | 2,396,774 | |
California Housing Finance Agency Rev. (Home Mortgage), “G”, 4.95%, 2023 | | | 8,080,000 | | | | 8,048,488 | |
California Housing Finance Agency Rev. (Home Mortgage), “L”, 5.45%, 2033 | | | 12,730,000 | | | | 12,350,137 | |
California Housing Finance Agency Rev., “A”, 4.75%, 2021 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 1,971,260 | |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “B-2”, 6.1%, 2023 | | | 85,000 | | | | 86,356 | |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “B-3”, 6.55%, 2033 | | | 150,000 | | | | 154,080 | |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “C-2”, 5.9%, 2023 | | | 215,000 | | | | 225,866 | |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., “C-2”, FHA, 6.6%, 2032 | | | 170,000 | | | | 175,217 | |
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), “B”, GNMA, 6.05%, 2037 | | | 1,025,000 | | | | 1,083,507 | |
New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority Rev., “B”, 6.5%, 2035 | | | 120,000 | | | | 120,907 | |
North Carolina Housing Finance Agency Rev., “30-A”, 5.25%, 2039 (u) | | | 11,640,000 | | | | 11,574,118 | |
Texas Affordable Housing Corp. (Single Family Mortgage), “B”, GNMA, 5.25%, 2039 | | | 1,530,000 | | | | 1,548,850 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 39,735,560 | |
28
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Solid Waste Revenue - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Sewer Sludge Disposal Rev. (Philadelphia Biosolids Facility), 6.25%, 2032 | | $ | 650,000 | | | $ | 679,900 | |
| | |
State & Agency - Other - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Mepsi Campus), “A”, 6.5%, 2037 | | $ | 3,600,000 | | | $ | 3,620,376 | |
| | |
State & Local Agencies - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
Acton-Agua Dulce, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, AGM, 0%, 2039 | | $ | 7,550,000 | | | $ | 1,628,158 | |
California Public Works Board Lease Rev. (Various Capital Projects), “G-1”, 5.75%, 2030 | | | 3,380,000 | | | | 3,717,121 | |
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Public School Building Authority Lease Rev. (School District of Philadelphia Project), 5%, 2028 | | | 1,740,000 | | | | 1,755,712 | |
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Public School Building Authority Lease Rev. (School District of Philadelphia Project), 5%, 2030 | | | 870,000 | | | | 867,990 | |
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Public School Building Authority Lease Rev. (School District of Philadelphia Project), 5%, 2031 | | | 655,000 | | | | 648,142 | |
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Public School Building Authority Lease Rev. (School District of Philadelphia Project), 5%, 2032 | | | 220,000 | | | | 215,800 | |
Delaware Valley, PA, Regional Finance Authority, AMBAC, 5.5%, 2018 | | | 1,380,000 | | | | 1,566,107 | |
Delaware Valley, PA, Regional Finance Authority, “B”, FRN, AMBAC, 0.047%, 2018 | | | 500,000 | | | | 500,000 | |
Delaware Valley, PA, Regional Finance Authority, RITES, FRN, AMBAC, 10.684%, 2018 (p) | | | 150,000 | | | | 190,458 | |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “A”, FGIC, 5%, 2035 | | | 2,030,000 | | | | 1,998,068 | |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “A”, 5%, 2045 | | | 6,065,000 | | | | 5,768,361 | |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “A-1”, AMBAC, 4.6%, 2023 | | | 1,185,000 | | | | 1,256,906 | |
Guam Government Department of Education (John F. Kennedy High School), “A”, COP, 6.875%, 2040 | | | 3,055,000 | | | | 3,102,780 | |
Harris County, TX, 5.8%, 2014 | | | 162,273 | | | | 165,961 | |
Harris County, TX, 5.625%, 2020 | | | 1,344,961 | | | | 1,345,674 | |
Massachusetts College Building Authority Rev., “C”, 3%, 2042 | | | 835,000 | | | | 554,691 | |
Philadelphia, PA, Municipal Authority Rev., 6.5%, 2034 | | | 1,060,000 | | | | 1,171,480 | |
29
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
State & Local Agencies - continued | |
Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., Commonwealth Appropriations, “B”, 6%, 2026 | | $ | 1,960,000 | | | $ | 1,904,963 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 28,358,372 | |
Student Loan Revenue - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp., “A-2”, 5.5%, 2025 | | $ | 1,615,000 | | | $ | 1,743,990 | |
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp., “A-2”, 5.6%, 2026 | | | 1,615,000 | | | | 1,730,117 | |
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp., “A-2”, 5.7%, 2027 | | | 190,000 | | | | 198,554 | |
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp., “A-2”, 5.75%, 2028 | | | 3,270,000 | | | | 3,471,824 | |
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev., “H”, ASSD GTY, 6.35%, 2030 | | | 2,690,000 | | | | 2,819,954 | |
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev., “I-A”, 5.5%, 2022 | | | 250,000 | | | | 274,400 | |
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev., “J”, 4.7%, 2026 | | | 2,400,000 | | | | 2,287,224 | |
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev., “J”, 4.9%, 2028 | | | 2,495,000 | | | | 2,350,340 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 14,876,403 | |
Tax - Other - 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Allentown, PA, Neighborhood Improvement Zone Development Authority Tax Rev., “A”, 5%, 2035 | | $ | 1,110,000 | | | $ | 1,054,866 | |
Allentown, PA, Neighborhood Improvement Zone Development Authority Tax Rev., “A”, 5%, 2042 | | | 4,605,000 | | | | 4,249,080 | |
Hudson Yards, NY, Infrastructure Corp. Rev., “A”, 5%, 2047 | | | 3,340,000 | | | | 3,307,769 | |
Hudson Yards, NY, Infrastructure Corp. Rev., “A”, 5.75%, 2047 | | | 3,230,000 | | | | 3,440,790 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev., 5%, 2026 | | | 885,000 | | | | 893,151 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev., 5%, 2028 | | | 355,000 | | | | 349,856 | |
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev., 5%, 2029 | | | 355,000 | | | | 346,622 | |
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev. (Diageo Project), “A”, 6.75%, 2037 | | | 4,090,000 | | | | 4,402,108 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 18,044,242 | |
Tax Assessment - 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
Altoona, IA, Urban Renewal Tax Increment Rev., 6%, 2043 | | $ | 3,000,000 | | | $ | 3,091,920 | |
Anne Arundel County, MD, Special Obligation (National Business Park-North Project), 6.1%, 2040 | | | 1,320,000 | | | | 1,379,545 | |
Anne Arundel County, MD, Special Obligation (VLG South Waugh Chapel Project), 6.25%, 2040 | | | 4,700,000 | | | | 4,927,433 | |
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev. (Centex Homes Project), “A-1”, 5.5%, 2036 (a)(d) | | | 635,000 | | | | 381,000 | |
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev. (Centex Homes Project), “A-3”, 5.5%, 2036 | | | 310,000 | | | | 298,722 | |
30
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Tax Assessment - continued | | | | | | | | |
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev. (Master Infrastructure Project),“B”, 5.1%, 2014 (a)(d) | | $ | 165,000 | | | $ | 99,000 | |
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev. (Master Infrastructure Projects), “A”, 5.35%, 2036 (a)(d) | | | 350,000 | | | | 210,000 | |
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev. (Master Infrastructure Projects), “A-2”, 5.35%, 2036 | | | 1,330,000 | | | | 1,194,500 | |
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev. (Master Infrastructure Projects), “B-2”, 5.1%, 2014 | | | 415,000 | | | | 419,183 | |
Arvada, CO, Cimarron Metropolitan District, Rev., 6%, 2022 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 1,903,860 | |
Atlanta, GA, Tax Allocation (Eastside Project), “B”, 5.6%, 2030 | | | 2,450,000 | | | | 2,567,527 | |
Atlanta, GA, Tax Allocation (Princeton Lakes Project), 5.5%, 2031 | | | 1,515,000 | | | | 1,555,708 | |
Baltimore, MD, Special Obligation, (East Baltimore Research Park Project), “A”, 7%, 2038 | | | 2,600,000 | | | | 2,732,938 | |
Capital Region Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., “A”, 7%, 2039 | | | 2,570,000 | | | | 2,481,541 | |
Century Gardens Village Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.1%, 2037 | | | 915,000 | | | | 817,763 | |
Concord Station Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5%, 2015 | | | 235,000 | | | | 233,440 | |
Corona-Norco, CA, Unified School District, Public Financing Authority Special Tax Rev. (Riverside County), “B”, 5%, 2035 | | | 480,000 | | | | 441,470 | |
Creekside Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.2%, 2038 (a)(d) | | | 2,600,000 | | | | 1,040,000 | |
Dardenne, MO, Town Square Transportation Development District, “A”, 5%, 2026 | | | 2,495,000 | | | | 1,208,279 | |
Du Page County, IL, Special Service Area No. 31 Special Tax (Monarch Landing Project), 5.625%, 2036 | | | 945,000 | | | | 921,734 | |
Embrey Mill Community Development Authority, VA, Special Assessment Rev., 7.25%, 2043 | | | 4,785,000 | | | | 4,583,121 | |
Heritage Harbour North Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 6.375%, 2038 | | | 1,840,000 | | | | 1,685,293 | |
Jurupa, CA, Community Facilities Services District, Special Tax (Eastvale Area District #31), “A”, 5%, 2037 | | | 250,000 | | | | 233,735 | |
Killarney Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5.125%, 2009 (a)(d) | | | 640,000 | | | | 288,000 | |
Lakeshore Villages Master Community Development District, LA, Special Assessment, “A”, 5.25%, 2017 (a)(d) | | | 2,862,000 | | | | 1,116,180 | |
Lancaster County, SC, Assessment Rev. (Sun City Carolina Lakes), 5.45%, 2037 | | | 1,540,000 | | | | 1,388,633 | |
31
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Tax Assessment - continued | | | | | | | | |
Legends Bay Community Development District, FL, “A”, 5.5%, 2014 | | $ | 1,445,000 | | | $ | 1,337,564 | |
Legends Bay Community Development District, FL, “A”, 5.875%, 2038 | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 966,580 | |
Lincolnshire, IL, Special Service Area No. 1 (Sedgebrook Project), 6.25%, 2034 | | | 3,137,000 | | | | 3,185,718 | |
Main Street Community Development District, FL, “A”, 6.8%, 2038 | | | 1,685,000 | | | | 1,641,139 | |
Middle Village Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A”, 5.8%, 2022 | | | 590,000 | | | | 490,426 | |
Miromar Lakes, FL, Community Development District, Capital Improvement Rev., 4.875%, 2022 | | | 910,000 | | | | 895,640 | |
Miromar Lakes, FL, Community Development District, Capital Improvement Rev., 5.375%, 2032 | | | 990,000 | | | | 952,043 | |
Naturewalk Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., “B”, 5.3%, 2016 (d)(q) | | | 2,300,000 | | | | 1,196,000 | |
Ohio County, WV, Commission Tax Increment Rev. (Fort Henry Centre), “A”, 5.85%, 2034 | | | 865,000 | | | | 879,100 | |
Old Palm Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment (Palm Beach Gardens), “B”, 5.375%, 2014 | | | 505,000 | | | | 502,404 | |
Osage Beach, MO, Tax Increment Rev. (Prewitts), 4.8%, 2016 | | | 1,075,000 | | | | 1,045,663 | |
Osage Beach, MO, Tax Increment Rev. (Prewitts), 5%, 2023 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,388,340 | |
OTC Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A”, 5.3%, 2038 | | | 3,620,000 | | | | 3,343,287 | |
Overland Park, KS, Special Assessment (Tallgrass Creek), 4.85%, 2016 | | | 666,000 | | | | 665,134 | |
Overland Park, KS, Special Assessment (Tallgrass Creek), 5.125%, 2028 | | | 3,848,000 | | | | 3,195,033 | |
Palm Glades Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A”, 5.3%, 2036 | | | 1,005,000 | | | | 913,595 | |
Palm River, FL, Community Development District, Special Assessment Rev., “A”, 5.375%, 2036 (a)(d) | | | 895,000 | | | | 358,000 | |
Palm River, FL, Community Development District, Special Assessment Rev., “B”, 5.15%, 2014 (a)(d) | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 400,000 | |
Panther Trace II, Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.125%, 2013 | | | 245,000 | | | | 236,538 | |
Parkway Center Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5.625%, 2014 | | | 1,925,000 | | | | 1,852,986 | |
Paseo Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., “B”, 4.875%, 2010 (a)(d) | | | 1,415,000 | | | | 14 | |
Paseo Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A-2”, 0%, 2036 | | | 2,990,000 | | | | 1,005,627 | |
Paseo Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “A-1”, 5.4%, 2036 | | | 250,000 | | | | 262,323 | |
32
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Tax Assessment - continued | | | | | | | | |
San Francisco, CA, City & County Redevelopment Successor Agency, Community Facilities District No. 6 (Mission Bay South Public Improvements), “A”, 5%, 2031 | | $ | 995,000 | | | $ | 974,195 | |
San Francisco, CA, City & County Redevelopment Successor Agency, Community Facilities District No. 6 (Mission Bay South Public Improvements), Capital Appreciation, “A”, 0%, 2043 | | | 8,725,000 | | | | 1,174,472 | |
Sterling Hill Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., “B”, 5.5%, 2010 (d) | | | 545,000 | | | | 351,073 | |
Stone Ridge, CO, Metropolitan District No. 2, 7.25%, 2031 | | | 2,396,000 | | | | 616,898 | |
Stonebrier Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.5%, 2037 | | | 1,675,000 | | | | 1,524,300 | |
Tallyn’s Reach, CO, Metropolitan District No. 3, CO, 5%, 2033 | | | 404,000 | | | | 358,619 | |
Tallyn’s Reach, CO, Metropolitan District No. 3, CO, 5.125%, 2038 | | | 824,000 | | | | 722,079 | |
Tuscany Reserve Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 5.25%, 2016 | | | 2,365,000 | | | | 2,348,752 | |
Two Creeks Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 5.25%, 2037 | | | 1,960,000 | | | | 1,382,702 | |
Villa Portofino East Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.2%, 2037 | | | 1,875,000 | | | | 1,566,131 | |
Villa Vizcaya Community Development District, FL, “A”, 5.55%, 2039 (a)(d) | | | 790,000 | | | | 339,700 | |
Washington County, PA, Redevelopment Authority (Victory Centre Project), “A”, 5.45%, 2035 | | | 770,000 | | | | 760,267 | |
Watergrass Community Development District, FL, “A”, 5.375%, 2039 | | | 1,465,000 | | | | 793,122 | |
Watergrass Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, “B”, 6.96%, 2017 | | | 580,000 | | | | 557,914 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 77,383,903 | |
Tobacco - 7.3% | | | | | | | | |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 5.875%, 2030 | | $ | 3,310,000 | | | $ | 2,631,715 | |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 5.75%, 2034 | | | 4,485,000 | | | | 3,381,376 | |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 5.875%, 2047 | | | 4,790,000 | | | | 3,606,631 | |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 6.5%, 2047 | | | 25,000,000 | | | | 20,322,500 | |
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-3”, 6.25%, 2037 | | | 11,535,000 | | | | 9,235,036 | |
California Statewide Financing Authority, Tobacco Settlement, 5.625%, 2029 | | | 3,010,000 | | | | 2,937,610 | |
District of Columbia, Tobacco Settlement, 6.25%, 2024 | | | 1,430,000 | | | | 1,443,571 | |
33
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Tobacco - continued | | | | | | | | |
District of Columbia, Tobacco Settlement, 6.75%, 2040 | | $ | 885,000 | | | $ | 889,168 | |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., “A-1”, 5.125%, 2047 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 3,547,350 | |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., “A-1”, 5.75%, 2047 | | | 23,705,000 | | | | 18,629,522 | |
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Asset Backed, “A-1”, 5%, 2033 | | | 6,085,000 | | | | 4,930,006 | |
Illinois Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, 6.25%, 2024 | | | 3,110,000 | | | | 3,375,252 | |
Illinois Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, 6%, 2028 | | | 14,375,000 | | | | 15,565,681 | |
Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority, Tobacco Settlement Rev., Asset Backed, “B”, 5.6%, 2034 | | | 4,295,000 | | | | 3,673,986 | |
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority Rev., Asset Backed, “A”, 6%, 2048 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 4,025,100 | |
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1-A”, 4.5%, 2023 | | | 17,700,000 | | | | 16,458,345 | |
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1-A”, 4.75%, 2034 | | | 26,335,000 | | | | 19,089,188 | |
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1-A”, 5%, 2041 | | | 34,705,000 | | | | 25,644,566 | |
Suffolk, NY, Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement, “B”, 5.25%, 2037 | | | 930,000 | | | | 900,454 | |
Washington Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., 6.5%, 2026 | | | 780,000 | | | | 782,324 | |
Washington Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., 6.625%, 2032 | | | 4,935,000 | | | | 4,964,265 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 166,033,646 | |
Toll Roads - 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
Chesapeake, VA, Toll Road Rev. (Transportation System), Convertible Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2032 | | $ | 1,610,000 | | | $ | 793,167 | |
Chesapeake, VA, Toll Road Rev. (Transportation System), Convertible Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2040 | | | 1,605,000 | | | | 719,473 | |
E-470 Public Highway Authority Rev., CO, “C”, 5.375%, 2026 | | | 755,000 | | | | 785,796 | |
E-470 Public Highway Authority Rev., CO, Capital Appreciation, “B”, NATL, 0%, 2027 | | | 12,305,000 | | | | 5,758,494 | |
Illinois Toll Highway Authority Rev., “B”, 5.5%, 2033 | | | 4,355,000 | | | | 4,658,021 | |
Mid-Bay Bridge Authority, FL, Springing Lien Rev., “A”, 7.25%, 2034 | | | 300,000 | | | | 362,382 | |
Mid-Bay Bridge Authority, FL, Springing Lien Rev., “A”, 7.25%, 2040 | | | 8,365,000 | | | | 10,072,297 | |
North Texas Tollway Authority Rev., 6%, 2043 | | | 1,280,000 | | | | 1,382,157 | |
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority Rev. (95 Express Lanes LLC), 5%, 2034 | | | 2,165,000 | | | | 1,932,566 | |
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority Rev. (95 Express Lanes LLC), 5%, 2040 | | | 3,460,000 | | | | 2,963,525 | |
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority Rev. (Elizabeth River Crossings Opco LLC Project), 5.25%, 2032 | | | 3,640,000 | | | | 3,454,578 | |
34
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Toll Roads - continued | | | | | | | | |
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority Rev. (Elizabeth River Crossings Opco LLC Project), 6%, 2037 | | $ | 6,065,000 | | | $ | 6,114,490 | |
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority Rev. (Elizabeth River Crossings Opco LLC Project), 5.5%, 2042 | | | 9,705,000 | | | | 9,009,152 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 48,006,098 | |
Transportation - Special Tax - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority Rev., NY, “A”, 5%, 2041 | | $ | 2,250,000 | | | $ | 2,251,350 | |
| | |
Universities - Colleges - 8.9% | | | | | | | | |
Allegheny County, PA, Higher Education Building Authority Rev. (Chatham University), “A”, 5%, 2030 | | $ | 915,000 | | | $ | 902,565 | |
Allegheny County, PA, Higher Education Building Authority Rev. (Robert Morris University), “A”, 5.9%, 2028 | | | 1,305,000 | | | | 1,369,584 | |
Allegheny County, PA, Higher Education Building Authority Rev. (Robert Morris University), “A”, 6%, 2038 | | | 2,025,000 | | | | 2,087,512 | |
Brevard County, FL, Industrial Development Rev. (TUFF Florida Tech LLC Project), 6.75%, 2039 | | | 4,720,000 | | | | 4,951,374 | |
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (California Lutheran University), 5.75%, 2038 | | | 2,320,000 | | | | 2,399,112 | |
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Chapman University), 5%, 2031 | | | 1,240,000 | | | | 1,273,232 | |
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University Financing Project), 5%, 2026 | | | 3,590,000 | | | | 3,259,935 | |
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of La Verne), “A”, 5%, 2029 | | | 2,205,000 | | | | 2,118,586 | |
California Municipal Finance Authority Rev. (Biola University), 5.8%, 2028 | | | 1,915,000 | | | | 2,034,075 | |
California Municipal Finance Authority Rev. (University of La Verne), “A”, 6.25%, 2040 | | | 900,000 | | | | 971,289 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (California Baptist University), “A”, 5.4%, 2027 | | | 1,385,000 | | | | 1,396,537 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (California Baptist University), “A”, 5.5%, 2038 | | | 4,580,000 | | | | 4,317,703 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Lancer Plaza Project), 5.625%, 2033 | | | 780,000 | | | | 709,387 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Lancer Plaza Project), 5.125%, 2023 | | | 730,000 | | | | 685,309 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Lancer Plaza Project), 5.875%, 2043 | | | 375,000 | | | | 336,405 | |
Claiborne County, TN, Industrial Development Board Rev. (Lincoln Memorial University Project), 6.125%, 2040 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,203,350 | |
Collier County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Ave Maria University, Inc. Project), “A”, 6.125%, 2043 | | | 3,200,000 | | | | 3,193,120 | |
35
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Universities - Colleges - continued | | | | | | | | |
Delaware County, PA, Authority College Rev. (Neumann University), 6%, 2025 | | $ | 510,000 | | | $ | 535,485 | |
Delaware County, PA, Authority College Rev. (Neumann University), 6.125%, 2034 | | | 250,000 | | | | 259,978 | |
Forest Grove, OR, Campus Improvement Rev. (Pacific University Project), 6.375%, 2039 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,526,575 | |
Forest Grove, OR, Student Housing Rev. (Oak Tree Foundation, Inc.), 5.5%, 2037 | | | 2,775,000 | | | | 2,597,678 | |
Grand Valley, MI, State University Rev., 5.5%, 2027 | | | 1,015,000 | | | | 1,093,957 | |
Grand Valley, MI, State University Rev., 5.625%, 2029 | | | 495,000 | | | | 531,229 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), “A”, 5%, 2031 | | | 3,125,000 | | | | 2,744,000 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), “A”, 5%, 2036 | | | 3,080,000 | | | | 2,619,817 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Roosevelt University Project), 6.25%, 2029 | | | 6,045,000 | | | | 6,434,056 | |
Indiana County, PA, Industrial Development Authority (Student Cooperative Association, Inc./Indiana University of Pennsylvania), 5%, 2033 | | | 960,000 | | | | 957,542 | |
Lakeland, FL, Educational Facilities Rev. (Florida Southern College), “A”, 5%, 2032 | | | 935,000 | | | | 914,720 | |
Lakeland, FL, Educational Facilities Rev. (Florida Southern College), “A”, 5%, 2042 | | | 740,000 | | | | 684,574 | |
Marietta, GA, Development Facilities Authority Rev. (Life University), 7%, 2030 | | | 2,330,000 | | | | 2,389,322 | |
Marietta, GA, Development Facilities Authority Rev. (Life University), 7%, 2039 | | | 1,575,000 | | | | 1,608,516 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Curry College), “A”, ACA, 5%, 2036 | | | 1,135,000 | | | | 1,078,976 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Curry College), “A”, RADIAN, 5%, 2036 | | | 800,000 | | | | 760,512 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Merrimack College), “A”, 5.25%, 2042 | | | 900,000 | | | | 870,093 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Simmons College), “H”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2033 | | | 430,000 | | | | 412,925 | |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Harvard University), 5.5%, 2036 (u) | | | 25,000,000 | | | | 27,925,000 | |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Simmons College), “I”, 8%, 2029 | | | 2,140,000 | | | | 2,373,453 | |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Suffolk University), “A”, 6.25%, 2030 | | | 6,130,000 | | | | 6,673,976 | |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Suffolk University), “A”, 5.75%, 2039 | | | 4,365,000 | | | | 4,518,430 | |
36
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Universities - Colleges - continued | | | | | | | | |
Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Metropolitan Government Health & Educational Facilities Board (Vanderbilt University), “A”, 5%, 2039 (u) | | $ | 10,000,000 | | | $ | 10,462,600 | |
Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Metropolitan Government Health & Educational Facilities Board (Vanderbilt University), “B”, 5%, 2039 (u) | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 10,462,600 | |
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Dartmouth College), 5.25%, 2039 (u) | | | 20,000,000 | | | | 21,084,000 | |
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Medicine & Dentistry), “B”, 7.5%, 2032 | | | 4,280,000 | | | | 5,669,930 | |
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Medicine & Dentistry), “B”, 6%, 2017 | | | 2,335,000 | | | | 2,751,377 | |
Northeastern Pennsylvania Hospital & Education Authority Rev. (Wilkes University), “A”, 5.25%, 2042 | | | 2,400,000 | | | | 2,351,208 | |
Oregon Facilities Authority Rev. (Concordia University Project), “A”, 6.125%, 2030 | | | 2,780,000 | | | | 2,849,472 | |
Oregon Facilities Authority Rev. (Concordia University Project), “A”, 6.375%, 2040 | | | 4,100,000 | | | | 4,213,447 | |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (La Salle University), “A”, 5.25%, 2027 | | | 1,330,000 | | | | 1,354,140 | |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Saint Francis University Project), “JJ2”, 6.25%, 2041 | | | 1,545,000 | | | | 1,621,817 | |
Pinellas County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Barry University), 5.25%, 2030 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 977,820 | |
Pinellas County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Barry University), 6%, 2041 | | | 5,330,000 | | | | 5,566,865 | |
Private Colleges & Universities, GA, Authority Rev. (Mercer University), “C”, 5.25%, 2027 | | | 920,000 | | | | 942,098 | |
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical, & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5.125%, 2032 | | | 425,000 | | | | 363,180 | |
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical, & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5.375%, 2042 | | | 1,040,000 | | | | 879,778 | |
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Medical, & Environmental Central Facilities (University of Sacred Heart), 4.375%, 2031 | | | 525,000 | | | | 433,923 | |
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Medical, & Environmental Central Facilities (University of Sacred Heart), 5%, 2042 | | | 260,000 | | | | 216,624 | |
Quad Cities, IL, Regional Economic Development Authority Rev. (Augustana College), 4%, 2021 | | | 600,000 | | | | 583,272 | |
Quad Cities, IL, Regional Economic Development Authority Rev. (Augustana College), 5%, 2025 | | | 890,000 | | | | 901,036 | |
37
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Universities - Colleges - continued | | | | | | | | |
Quad Cities, IL, Regional Economic Development Authority Rev. (Augustana College), 5%, 2026 | | $ | 800,000 | | | $ | 805,792 | |
San Leanna, TX, Educational Facilities Corp., Higher Education Rev. (St. Edwards University), 4.75%, 2032 | | | 2,150,000 | | | | 1,969,336 | |
San Leanna, TX, Educational Facilities Corp., Higher Education Rev. (St. Edwards University), 5.125%, 2036 | | | 1,055,000 | | | | 1,001,206 | |
Tulsa, OK, Industrial Authority Rev. (University of Tulsa), 6%, 2027 | | | 4,795,000 | | | | 5,236,859 | |
University of Southern Indiana Rev. (Student Fee), “J”, ASSD GTY, 5.75%, 2028 | | | 1,445,000 | | | | 1,639,829 | |
Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Whitworth University), 5%, 2032 | | | 750,000 | | | | 725,708 | |
Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Whitworth University), 5.875%, 2034 | | | 2,435,000 | | | | 2,519,154 | |
Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Whitworth University), 5.25%, 2037 | | | 1,100,000 | | | | 1,082,169 | |
Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Whitworth University), 5.25%, 2046 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 967,910 | |
Wilkes-Barre, PA, Finance Authority Rev. (Wilkes University), 5%, 2037 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 2,848,590 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Beloit College), “A”, 6.125%, 2035 | | | 710,000 | | | | 750,172 | |
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Beloit College), “A”, 6.125%, 2039 | | | 1,435,000 | | | | 1,511,973 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 202,463,774 | |
Universities - Dormitories - 2.3% | | | | | | | | |
Bowling Green, OH, Student Housing Rev. (State University Project), 6%, 2045 | | $ | 5,990,000 | | | $ | 6,175,091 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Lancer Educational Student Housing Project), 5.625%, 2033 | | | 2,345,000 | | | | 2,272,657 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Lancer Educational Student Housing Project), 7.5%, 2042 | | | 1,575,000 | | | | 1,688,668 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Student Housing, SUCI East Campus), 6%, 2040 | | | 2,125,000 | | | | 2,205,006 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (University of California, Irvine East Campus Apartments), 5.375%, 2038 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,034,890 | |
Chester County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Student Housing Rev. (University Student Housing LLC Project), 5%, 2030 | | | 825,000 | | | | 781,572 | |
Chester County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Student Housing Rev. (University Student Housing LLC Project), 5%, 2045 | | | 1,030,000 | | | | 894,689 | |
District of Columbia Student Dormitory Rev. (Provident Group - Howard Properties LLC), 5%, 2030 | | | 1,475,000 | | | | 1,379,671 | |
38
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Universities - Dormitories - continued | | | | | | | | |
District of Columbia Student Dormitory Rev. (Provident Group - Howard Properties LLC), 5%, 2035 | | $ | 5,000,000 | | | $ | 4,527,400 | |
District of Columbia Student Dormitory Rev. (Provident Group - Howard Properties LLC), 5%, 2045 | | | 8,820,000 | | | | 7,692,716 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Student Housing Rev. (Illinois State University), 6.75%, 2031 | | | 1,875,000 | | | | 2,039,175 | |
Illinois Finance Authority Student Housing Rev. (Northern Illinois University Project), 6.625%, 2031 | | | 5,785,000 | | | | 6,350,947 | |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (East Stroudsburg University), 5%, 2042 | | | 2,525,000 | | | | 2,252,982 | |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Edinboro University Foundation), 5.8%, 2030 | | | 740,000 | | | | 773,293 | |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Edinboro University Foundation), 6%, 2043 | | | 1,050,000 | | | | 1,081,584 | |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Shippensburg University Student Services), 5%, 2030 | | | 1,195,000 | | | | 1,178,676 | |
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Shippensburg University Student Services), 6.25%, 2043 | | | 5,500,000 | | | | 5,864,375 | |
Platteville, WI, Redevelopment Authority, Redevelopment Rev. (Platteville Real Estate), 5%, 2032 | | | 1,115,000 | | | | 1,053,675 | |
Platteville, WI, Redevelopment Authority, Redevelopment Rev. (Platteville Real Estate), 5%, 2042 | | | 2,390,000 | | | | 2,088,836 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 53,335,903 | |
Universities - Secondary Schools - 6.0% | | | | | | | | |
Anoka County, MN, Charter School Lease Rev. (Spectrum Building Co.), “A”, 5%, 2027 | | $ | 290,000 | | | $ | 286,561 | |
Anoka County, MN, Charter School Lease Rev. (Spectrum Building Co.), “A”, 5%, 2032 | | | 300,000 | | | | 286,932 | |
Anoka County, MN, Charter School Lease Rev. (Spectrum Building Co.), “A”, 5%, 2043 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 897,460 | |
Build NYC Resource Corp. Rev. (International Leadership Charter School Project), 5.75%, 2033 (n) | | | 3,860,000 | | | | 3,479,365 | |
Build NYC Resource Corp. Rev. (International Leadership Charter School Project), 6%, 2043 (n) | | | 4,025,000 | | | | 3,568,726 | |
Build NYC Resources Corp. Rev. (South Bronx Charter School for International Cultures and the Arts), “A”, 5%, 2043 | | | 1,790,000 | | | | 1,489,405 | |
California Municipal Finance Authority Rev. (Partnerships to Uplift Communities Project), “A”, 5%, 2032 | | | 1,585,000 | | | | 1,448,706 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority School Facility Rev. (Aspire Public Schools), 6.375%, 2045 | | | 5,965,000 | | | | 6,152,480 | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority School Facility Rev. (Aspire Public Schools), 6.125%, 2046 | | | 7,630,000 | | | | 7,782,066 | |
39
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Universities - Secondary Schools - continued | |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, School Facility Rev. (Aspire Public Schools), 6%, 2030 | | $ | 1,990,000 | | | $ | 2,041,461 | |
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Idea Public Schools), 5.5%, 2031 | | | 870,000 | | | | 897,875 | |
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Idea Public Schools), 5.75%, 2041 | | | 695,000 | | | | 714,766 | |
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Idea Public Schools), 5%, 2042 | | | 2,385,000 | | | | 2,193,628 | |
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Uplift Education), “A”, 6.125%, 2040 | | | 4,940,000 | | | | 5,168,969 | |
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Uplift Education), “A”, 4.35%, 2042 | | | 1,270,000 | | | | 970,940 | |
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Uplift Education), “A”, 6.25%, 2045 | | | 1,670,000 | | | | 1,754,769 | |
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Littleton Preparatory Charter School Project), 5%, 2033 | | | 450,000 | | | | 417,137 | |
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Littleton Preparatory Charter School Project), 5%, 2042 | | | 540,000 | | | | 474,595 | |
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Montessori Charter School Project), 4%, 2027 | | | 370,000 | | | | 345,876 | |
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Montessori Charter School Project), 5%, 2037 | | | 490,000 | | | | 467,617 | |
Delaware Economic Development Authority Rev. (Newark Charter School, Inc. Project), 5%, 2042 | | | 1,170,000 | | | | 1,116,531 | |
District of Columbia Rev. (Kipp, D.C. Charter School),“A”, 6%, 2043 | | | 1,095,000 | | | | 1,131,255 | |
District of Columbia Rev. (Kipp, D.C. Charter School),“A”, 6%, 2033 | | | 420,000 | | | | 441,743 | |
Florence, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Rev. (Legacy Traditional School Project - Queen Creek & Casa Grande Campuses), 6%, 2043 | | | 3,150,000 | | | | 2,847,821 | |
Florida Development Finance Corp. Educational Facilities Rev. (Bay Area Charter Foundation LLC), “A”, 7.75%, 2042 | | | 3,480,000 | | | | 3,690,262 | |
Florida Development Finance Corp. Educational Facilities Rev. (Renaissance Charter School), “A”, 6%, 2032 | | | 1,950,000 | | | | 1,745,445 | |
Florida Development Finance Corp. Educational Facilities Rev. (Renaissance Charter School), “A”, 6.125%, 2043 | | | 4,070,000 | | | | 3,526,533 | |
Florida Development Finance Corp. Educational Facilities Rev. (Renaissance Charter School),“A”, 6%, 2030 | | | 2,575,000 | | | | 2,489,381 | |
Florida Development Finance Corp. Educational Facilities Rev. (Renaissance Charter School),“A”, 6%, 2040 | | | 5,490,000 | | | | 5,095,818 | |
Florida Development Finance Corp. Educational Facilities Rev. (Renaissance Charter School),“A”, 7.625%, 2041 | | | 10,125,000 | | | | 10,707,896 | |
40
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Universities - Secondary Schools - continued | |
Illinois Finance Authority Charter School Rev. (Uno Charter School Network, Inc.), “A”, 7.125%, 2041 | | $ | 2,000,000 | | | $ | 2,253,080 | |
La Vernia, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (KIPP, Inc.), “A”, 6.25%, 2039 | | | 1,670,000 | | | | 1,818,263 | |
La Vernia, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Lifeschool of Dallas), “A”, 7.5%, 2041 | | | 4,385,000 | | | | 4,896,510 | |
Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lee Charter Foundation), “A”, 5.25%, 2027 | | | 2,070,000 | | | | 2,000,634 | |
Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lee Charter Foundation), “A”, 5.375%, 2037 | | | 3,155,000 | | | | 2,891,368 | |
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Washington Christian Academy), 5.25%, 2018 (a)(d) | | | 985,000 | | | | 285,650 | |
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Washington Christian Academy), 5.5%, 2038 (a)(d) | | | 460,000 | | | | 133,400 | |
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, Economic Development Authority Rev. (Our Lady of Good Council), “A”, 6%, 2035 | | | 450,000 | | | | 456,989 | |
Newark, TX, Cultural Education Facilities, Finance Corp. Lease Rev. (A.W. Brown Fellowship Academy), “A”, 6%, 2032 | | | 620,000 | | | | 615,127 | |
North Texas Education Finance Corp., Education Rev. (Uplift Education), “A”, 4.875%, 2032 | | | 705,000 | | | | 641,198 | |
North Texas Education Finance Corp., Education Rev. (Uplift Education), “A”, 5.125%, 2042 | | | 2,355,000 | | | | 2,156,709 | |
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (Philadelphia Performing Arts Charter School Project), 6.5%, 2033 | | | 2,780,000 | | | | 2,734,102 | |
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (Philadelphia Performing Arts Charter School Project), 6.75%, 2043 | | | 5,820,000 | | | | 5,709,478 | |
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (Tacony Academy Charter School Project), “A-1”, 6.75%, 2033 | | | 850,000 | | | | 846,226 | |
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (Tacony Academy Charter School Project), “A-1”, 7%, 2043 | | | 1,670,000 | | | | 1,661,516 | |
Philadelphia, PA, Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (Discovery Charter School Project), 6.25%, 2037 | | | 1,065,000 | | | | 1,102,275 | |
Philadelphia, PA, Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (Discovery Charter School Project), 6.25%, 2042 | | | 1,950,000 | | | | 2,011,542 | |
Philadelphia, PA, Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (Global Leadership Academy Project), 5.75%, 2030 | | | 520,000 | | | | 496,402 | |
Philadelphia, PA, Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (MaST Charter School), 6%, 2035 | | | 470,000 | | | | 481,567 | |
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Rev. (Choice Academies, Inc. Project), 5.625%, 2042 | | | 2,205,000 | | | | 2,004,830 | |
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Rev. (Eagle College Prep Project), 5%, 2033 | | | 855,000 | | | | 786,164 | |
41
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Universities - Secondary Schools - continued | |
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Rev. (Eagle College Prep Project), 5%, 2043 | | $ | 1,715,000 | | | $ | 1,492,787 | |
San Juan, TX, Higher Education Finance Authority Education Rev. (Idea Public Schools), “A”, 6.7%, 2040 | | | 2,955,000 | | | | 3,229,431 | |
Seminole County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Choices in Learning, Inc.),“A”, 7.375%, 2041 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,625,050 | |
St. Paul, MN, Housing & Redevelopment Authority Charter School Lease Rev. (Nova Classical Academy), “A”, 6.375%, 2031 | | | 630,000 | | | | 654,287 | |
St. Paul, MN, Housing & Redevelopment Authority Charter School Lease Rev. (Nova Classical Academy), “A”, 6.625%, 2042 | | | 1,260,000 | | | | 1,312,177 | |
Utah County, UT, Charter School Finance Authority, Charter School Rev. (Early Light Academy Project), 8.25%, 2035 | | | 3,730,000 | | | | 4,124,970 | |
Utah County, UT, Charter School Finance Authority, Charter School Rev. (Hawthorne Academy Project), 8.25%, 2035 | | | 4,015,000 | | | | 4,277,059 | |
Utah County, UT, Charter School Rev. (Renaissance Academy), “A”, 5.625%, 2037 | | | 2,405,000 | | | | 2,135,183 | |
Utah County, UT, Charter School Rev. (Ronald Wilson Reagan Academy), “A”, 6%, 2038 | | | 6,070,000 | | | | 5,851,237 | |
Woodbury, MN, Charter School Lease Rev. (MSA Building Co.), “A”, 5%, 2027 | | | 210,000 | | | | 201,277 | |
Woodbury, MN, Charter School Lease Rev. (MSA Building Co.), “A”, 5%, 2032 | | | 220,000 | | | | 202,811 | |
Woodbury, MN, Charter School Lease Rev. (MSA Building Co.), “A”, 5%, 2043 | | | 880,000 | | | | 760,962 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 136,482,280 | |
Utilities - Cogeneration - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Water Furnishing Rev. (Poseidon Resources Desalination Project), 5%, 2045 | | $ | 13,690,000 | | | $ | 11,540,944 | |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Rev., Resource Recovery Rev. (Colver), “G”, 5.125%, 2015 | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,206,816 | |
St. Paul, MN, Port Authority Rev. (Energy Park Utility Co. Project), 5.45%, 2028 | | | 250,000 | | | | 243,265 | |
St. Paul, MN, Port Authority Rev. (Energy Park Utility Co. Project), 5.7%, 2036 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,207,925 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 14,198,950 | |
Utilities - Investor Owned - 3.2% | | | | | | | | |
Apache County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (Tucson Electric Power Co.),“A”, 4.5%, 2030 | | $ | 5,170,000 | | | $ | 4,814,614 | |
Brazos River, TX, Pollution Control Authority Rev. (TXU Energy Co. LLC Project), 5%, 2041 | | | 3,015,000 | | | | 173,363 | |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Water Facilities Rev. (American Water Capital Corp. Project), 5.25%, 2040 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,435,600 | |
42
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Utilities - Investor Owned - continued | | | | | | | | |
Chula Vista, CA, Industrial Development Rev. (San Diego Gas & Electric Co.), “E”, 5.875%, 2034 | | $ | 1,940,000 | | | $ | 2,089,555 | |
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service New Mexico), “D”, 5.9%, 2040 | | | 11,915,000 | | | | 12,534,461 | |
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance Special Purpose Rev. (Hawaiian Electric Co. & Subsidiary), 6.5%, 2039 | | | 10,580,000 | | | | 11,677,675 | |
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance Special Purpose Rev. (Hawaiian Electric Co. & Subsidiary),“A”, FGIC, 4.8%, 2025 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,004,950 | |
Maricopa County, AZ, Pollution Control Rev. (El Paso Electric), “B”, 7.25%, 2040 | | | 1,790,000 | | | | 2,007,628 | |
Maricopa County, AZ, Pollution Control Rev. (Southern California Edison Co.),“A”, 5%, 2035 | | | 4,700,000 | | | | 4,761,993 | |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Dominion Energy Brayton), 5.75%, 2042 (b) | | | 685,000 | | | | 842,379 | |
Matagorda County, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (Central Power & Light Co.), “A”, 6.3%, 2029 | | | 2,155,000 | | | | 2,382,503 | |
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Detroit Edison Co.), 5.625%, 2020 | | | 1,050,000 | | | | 1,227,146 | |
Ohio Air Quality Development Authority Rev. (FirstEnergy Corp.), “A”, 5.7%, 2020 | | | 4,335,000 | | | | 4,944,804 | |
Owen County, KY, Waterworks System Rev. (American Water Co. Project), “A”, 6.25%, 2039 | | | 1,635,000 | | | | 1,713,464 | |
Owen County, KY, Waterworks System Rev. (American Water Co. Project), “B”, 5.625%, 2039 | | | 1,830,000 | | | | 1,862,354 | |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (Allegheny Energy Supply Co. LLC), 7%, 2039 | | | 7,390,000 | | | | 7,631,357 | |
Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 5.75%, 2029 | | | 5,430,000 | | | | 5,499,070 | |
Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Tucson Electric Power Co.), “A”, 5.25%, 2040 | | | 4,755,000 | | | | 4,594,519 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 73,197,435 | |
Utilities - Municipal Owned - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Gulf Opportunity Zone Rev., “A”, 5%, 2037 | | $ | 3,000,000 | | | $ | 3,032,580 | |
Philadelphia, PA, Gas Works Rev., 5.25%, 2040 | | | 1,070,000 | | | | 1,085,611 | |
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Rev., “AAA”, 5.25%, 2031 | | | 2,245,000 | | | | 1,939,792 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,057,983 | |
Utilities - Other - 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
California M-S-R Energy Authority Gas Rev., “A”, 7%, 2034 | | $ | 1,135,000 | | | $ | 1,372,499 | |
California M-S-R Energy Authority Gas Rev., “A”, 6.5%, 2039 | | | 5,110,000 | | | | 5,861,630 | |
43
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
| | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Utilities - Other - continued | | | | | | | | |
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5.5%, 2028 | | $ | 2,245,000 | | | $ | 2,372,718 | |
Public Authority for Colorado Energy Natural Gas Purchase Rev., 6.25%, 2028 | | | 5,275,000 | | | | 5,912,906 | |
Public Authority for Colorado Energy Natural Gas Purchase Rev., 6.5%, 2038 | | | 7,145,000 | | | | 8,199,531 | |
SA Energy Acquisition Public Facility Corp. (Tex Gas Supply), 5.5%, 2027 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,183,080 | |
Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Rev., 5%, 2032 | | | 6,670,000 | | | | 6,468,566 | |
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2019 | | | 12,055,000 | | | | 13,248,204 | |
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2022 | | | 2,105,000 | | | | 2,268,601 | |
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2024 | | | 3,625,000 | | | | 3,798,638 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 53,686,373 | |
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue - 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Rev., “A”, 6%, 2022 | | $ | 2,895,000 | | | $ | 3,414,537 | |
Clairton, PA, Municipal Authority, “B”, 5%, 2037 | | | 1,735,000 | | | | 1,603,973 | |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., “A”, 5%, 2033 | | | 8,750,000 | | | | 7,020,825 | |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., “A”, 5.75%, 2037 | | | 6,865,000 | | | | 5,924,907 | |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., “A”, 6%, 2038 | | | 3,880,000 | | | | 3,415,719 | |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2042 | | | 1,660,000 | | | | 1,301,689 | |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., “A”, 6%, 2044 | | | 6,880,000 | | | | 5,974,592 | |
DeKalb County, GA, Water & Sewer Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2031 | | | 175,000 | | | | 185,337 | |
Detroit, MI, Water & Sewerage Department, Sewage Disposal System Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2039 | | | 215,000 | | | | 196,289 | |
Madera, CA, Irrigation Financing Authority Rev., 6.5%, 2040 | | | 5,970,000 | | | | 6,367,781 | |
Orange County, CA, Sanitation District, Wastewater Rev., “A”, 4%, 2033 (u) | | | 20,000,000 | | | | 18,839,600 | |
St. Johns County, FL, Water & Sewer Rev., Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2030 | | | 850,000 | | | | 363,273 | |
St. Johns County, FL, Water & Sewer Rev., Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2033 | | | 900,000 | | | | 322,281 | |
St. Johns County, FL, Water & Sewer Rev., Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 2034 | | | 960,000 | | | | 325,421 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 55,256,224 | |
Total Municipal Bonds (Identified Cost, $2,287,520,708) | | | $ | 2,292,022,747 | |
44
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Floating Rate Demand Notes - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Sublette County, WY, Pollution Control Rev. (Exxon Mobil Corp.), 0.04%, due 8/01/13, at Identified Cost | | $ | 6,100,000 | | | $ | 6,100,000 | |
| | |
Money Market Funds - 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.08%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | | | 39,104,487 | | | $ | 39,104,487 | |
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $2,332,725,195) | | | | | | $ | 2,337,227,234 | |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (2.4)% | | | | | | | (54,371,403 | ) |
Net Assets - 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 2,282,855,831 | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | Mandatory tender date is earlier than stated maturity date. |
(d) | In default. Interest and/or scheduled principal payment(s) have been missed. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $21,018,141 representing 0.9% of net assets. |
(p) | Primary inverse floater. |
(q) | Interest received was less than stated coupon rate. |
(u) | Underlying security deposited into special purpose trust (“the trust”) by investment banker upon creation of self-deposited inverse floaters. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Securities | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | | Value | |
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.4%, 2049 | | 10/14/04 | | | $2,000,000 | | | | $1,900,260 | |
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.9%, 2049 | | 11/02/05 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 1,800,180 | |
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | $3,700,440 | |
% of Net assets | | | | | | | | | 0.2% | |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
COP | | Certificate of Participation |
FRN | | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
45
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | |
Insurers | | | | Inverse Floaters |
ACA | | ACA Financial Guaranty Corp. | | RITES | | Residual Interest Tax-Exempt Security |
AGM | | Assured Guaranty Municipal | | | | |
AMBAC | | AMBAC Indemnity Corp. | | | | |
ASSD GTY | | Assured Guaranty Insurance Co. | | | | |
FGIC | | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. | | | | |
FHA | | Federal Housing Administration | | | | |
FNMA | | Federal National Mortgage Assn. | | | | |
GNMA | | Government National Mortgage Assn. | | | | |
NATL | | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. | | | | |
PSF | | Permanent School Fund | | | | |
RADIAN | | Radian Asset Assurance, Inc. | | | | |
SYNCORA | | Syncora Guarantee Inc. | | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
46
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 7/31/13 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
| | | | |
Assets | | | | |
Investments- | | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $2,293,620,708) | | | $2,298,122,747 | |
Underlying affiliated funds, at cost and value | | | 39,104,487 | |
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $2,332,725,195) | | | $2,337,227,234 | |
Cash | | | 27,000 | |
Receivables for | | | | |
Investments sold | | | 2,959,892 | |
Fund shares sold | | | 3,250,201 | |
Interest and dividends | | | 31,833,957 | |
Receivable from investment adviser | | | 24,099 | |
Other assets | | | 6,879 | |
Total assets | | | $2,375,329,262 | |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payables for | | | | |
Distributions | | | $1,911,766 | |
Investments purchased | | | 1,536,930 | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 115,260 | |
Fund shares reacquired | | | 10,207,963 | |
Payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets | | | 77,009,525 | |
Payable to affiliates | | | | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 1,532,275 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 24,630 | |
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | | | 15,755 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 119,327 | |
Total liabilities | | | $92,473,431 | |
Net assets | | | $2,282,855,831 | |
Net assets consist of | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | $2,387,384,700 | |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | | | 4,502,039 | |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | (117,496,013 | ) |
Undistributed net investment income | | | 8,465,105 | |
Net assets | | | $2,282,855,831 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | | | 299,560,734 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net assets | | | Shares outstanding | | | Net asset value per share (a) | |
Class A | | | $1,628,339,171 | | | | 213,681,006 | | | | $7.62 | |
Class B | | | 42,921,668 | | | | 5,626,658 | | | | 7.63 | |
Class C | | | 257,776,531 | | | | 33,791,795 | | | | 7.63 | |
Class I | | | 353,818,461 | | | | 46,461,275 | | | | 7.62 | |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Class A, for which the maximum offering price per share was $8.00 [100 / 95.25 x $7.62]. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering price of Class A shares is reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Class I. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
47
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended 7/31/13 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | | |
Income | | | | |
Interest | | | $75,410,231 | |
Dividends from underlying affiliated funds | | | 30,086 | |
Total investment income | | | $75,440,317 | |
Expenses | | | | |
Management fee | | | $7,525,000 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 1,693,449 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 1,313,037 | |
Administrative services fee | | | 175,395 | |
Independent Trustees’ compensation | | | 27,387 | |
Custodian fee | | | 99,501 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 65,956 | |
Audit and tax fees | | | 28,926 | |
Legal fees | | | 23,564 | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 323,003 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 180,823 | |
Total expenses | | | $11,456,041 | |
Fees paid indirectly | | | (143 | ) |
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser | | | (318,871 | ) |
Net expenses | | | $11,137,027 | |
Net investment income | | | $64,303,290 | |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | | |
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | | | | |
Investments | | | $(6,459,389 | ) |
Futures contracts | | | (2,765,682 | ) |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | $(9,225,071 | ) |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | |
Investments | | | $(224,010,988 | ) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | $(233,236,059 | ) |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $(168,932,769 | ) |
See Notes to Financial Statements
48
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
| | | | | | | | |
Change in net assets | | Six months ended 7/31/13 (unaudited) | | | Year ended 1/31/13 | |
From operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | $64,303,290 | | | | $124,456,981 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | (9,225,071 | ) | | | 907,923 | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | (224,010,988 | ) | | | 139,194,217 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $(168,932,769 | ) | | | $264,559,121 | |
Distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(61,854,837 | ) | | | $(119,759,769 | ) |
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | | | $(445,496,150 | ) | | | $525,888,072 | |
Total change in net assets | | | $(676,283,756 | ) | | | $670,687,424 | |
Net assets | | | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | | | 2,959,139,587 | | | | 2,288,452,163 | |
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $8,465,105 and $6,016,652, respectively) | | | $2,282,855,831 | | | | $2,959,139,587 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
49
Financial Statements
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class A | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $8.34 | | | | $7.89 | | | | $7.13 | | | | $7.39 | | | | $6.33 | | | | $8.06 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.39 | | | | $0.41 | | | | $0.43 | | | | $0.43 | | | | $0.44 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | (0.73 | ) | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.75 | | | | (0.27 | ) | | | 1.05 | | | | (1.73 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $(0.53 | ) | | | $0.83 | | | | $1.16 | | | | $0.16 | | | | $1.48 | | | | $(1.29 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.19 | ) | | | $(0.38 | ) | | | $(0.40 | ) | | | $(0.42 | ) | | | $(0.42 | ) | | | $(0.44 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $7.62 | | | | $8.34 | | | | $7.89 | | | | $7.13 | | | | $7.39 | | | | $6.33 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | (6.48 | )(n) | | | 10.72 | | | | 16.83 | | | | 2.03 | | | | 24.03 | | | | (16.50 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 0.71 | (a) | | | 0.72 | | | | 0.71 | | | | 0.72 | | | | 0.72 | | | | 0.80 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 0.69 | (a) | | | 0.70 | | | | 0.70 | | | | 0.70 | | | | 0.69 | | | | 0.70 | |
Net investment income | | | 4.82 | (a) | | | 4.83 | | | | 5.49 | | | | 5.68 | | | | 6.17 | | | | 5.97 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 11 | (n) | | | 18 | | | | 21 | | | | 20 | | | | 17 | | | | 38 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $1,628,339 | | | | $2,161,677 | | | | $1,858,416 | | | | $1,463,867 | | | | $1,452,126 | | | | $1,039,232 | |
Supplemental Ratios (%): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets after expense reductions and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l) | | | 0.67 | (a) | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.64 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
50
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class B | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $8.35 | | | | $7.90 | | | | $7.13 | | | | $7.40 | | | | $6.33 | | | | $8.06 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.16 | | | | $0.33 | | | | $0.35 | | | | $0.37 | | | | $0.38 | | | | $0.38 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | (0.72 | ) | | | 0.43 | | | | 0.76 | | | | (0.28 | ) | | | 1.06 | | | | (1.73 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $(0.56 | ) | | | $0.76 | | | | $1.11 | | | | $0.09 | | | | $1.44 | | | | $(1.35 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.16 | ) | | | $(0.31 | ) | | | $(0.34 | ) | | | $(0.36 | ) | | | $(0.37 | ) | | | $(0.38 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $7.63 | | | | $8.35 | | | | $7.90 | | | | $7.13 | | | | $7.40 | | | | $6.33 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | (6.84 | )(n) | | | 9.82 | | | | 16.06 | | | | 1.10 | | | | 23.25 | | | | (17.16 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.71 | (a) | | | 1.71 | | | | 1.71 | | | | 1.64 | | | | 1.50 | | | | 1.56 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.50 | (a) | | | 1.51 | | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.47 | | | | 1.47 | |
Net investment income | | | 4.03 | (a) | | | 4.02 | | | | 4.74 | | | | 4.89 | | | | 5.45 | | | | 5.18 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 11 | (n) | | | 18 | | | | 21 | | | | 20 | | | | 17 | | | | 38 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $42,922 | | | | $52,886 | | | | $47,927 | | | | $50,750 | | | | $68,348 | | | | $75,791 | |
Supplemental Ratios (%): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets after expense reductions and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l) | | | 1.48 | (a) | | | 1.48 | | | | 1.46 | | | | 1.46 | | | | 1.45 | | | | 1.41 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
51
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class C | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $8.35 | | | | $7.90 | | | | $7.13 | | | | $7.40 | | | | $6.33 | | | | $8.06 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.16 | | | | $0.31 | | | | $0.33 | | | | $0.35 | | | | $0.36 | | | | $0.36 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | (0.73 | ) | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.77 | | | | (0.27 | ) | | | 1.06 | | | | (1.72 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $(0.57 | ) | | | $0.75 | | | | $1.10 | | | | $0.08 | | | | $1.42 | | | | $(1.36 | ) |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.15 | ) | | | $(0.30 | ) | | | $(0.33 | ) | | | $(0.35 | ) | | | $(0.35 | ) | | | $(0.37 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $7.63 | | | | $8.35 | | | | $7.90 | | | | $7.13 | | | | $7.40 | | | | $6.33 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | (6.93 | )(n) | | | 9.61 | | | | 15.82 | | | | 0.88 | | | | 22.99 | | | | (17.36 | ) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.71 | (a) | | | 1.71 | | | | 1.71 | | | | 1.72 | | | | 1.72 | | | | 1.80 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.69 | (a) | | | 1.70 | | | | 1.70 | | | | 1.70 | | | | 1.69 | | | | 1.70 | |
Net investment income | | | 3.84 | (a) | | | 3.82 | | | | 4.51 | | | | 4.68 | | | | 5.17 | | | | 4.96 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 11 | (n) | | | 18 | | | | 21 | | | | 20 | | | | 17 | | | | 38 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $257,777 | | | | $299,381 | | | | $236,487 | | | | $209,064 | | | | $213,166 | | | | $155,407 | |
Supplemental Ratios (%): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets after expense reductions and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l) | | | 1.67 | (a) | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.64 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
52
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Years ended 1/31 | |
Class I | | | 2013 | | | 2012 (i) | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $8.34 | | | | $7.89 | | | | $7.28 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.20 | | | | $0.39 | | | | $0.26 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | (0.73 | ) | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.61 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $(0.53 | ) | | | $0.83 | | | | $0.87 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.19 | ) | | | $(0.38 | ) | | | $(0.26 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $7.62 | | | | $8.34 | | | | $7.89 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | (6.48 | )(n) | | | 10.71 | | | | 12.22 | (n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 0.71 | (a) | | | 0.72 | | | | 0.72 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 0.69 | (a) | | | 0.70 | | | | 0.69 | (a) |
Net investment income | | | 4.83 | (a) | | | 4.82 | | | | 5.03 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 11 | (n) | | | 18 | | | | 21 | (n) |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $353,818 | | | | $445,195 | | | | $145,622 | |
Supplemental Ratios (%): | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets after expense reductions and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l) | | | 0.67 | (a) | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.67 | (a) |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(i) | For the period from the class inception June 1, 2011 through the stated period end. |
(l) | Interest expense and fees relate to payments made to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(x) | The net asset values per share and total returns have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
53
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) Business and Organization
MFS Municipal High Income Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust III which is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests primarily in municipal instruments. The value of municipal instruments can be affected by changes in their actual or perceived credit quality. The credit quality of municipal instruments can be affected by, among other things, the financial condition of the issuer or guarantor, the issuer’s future borrowing plans and sources of revenue, the economic feasibility of the revenue bond project or general borrowing purpose, political or economic developments in the region where the instrument is issued and the liquidity of the security. Municipal instruments generally trade in the over-the-counter market. Municipal instruments backed by current and anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets can be negatively affected by the discontinuance of the taxation supporting the projects or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. If the Internal Revenue Service determines an issuer of a municipal instrument has not complied with the applicable tax requirements, interest from the security could become taxable, the security could decline in value, and the funds may be required to issue Forms 1099-DIV. The fund invests in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions.
In this reporting period, the fund adopted the disclosure provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update 2011-11 (“ASU 2011-11”), Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities along with the related scope clarification provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Update 2013-01 (“ASU 2013-01”) entitled Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2011-11 is intended to enhance disclosures on the offsetting of financial assets and liabilities by requiring entities to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments and transactions that are either offset in the statement of financial position or subject to a Master Netting Agreement or similar arrangement. ASU 2013-01 limits the scope of ASU 2011-11’s disclosure requirements on offsetting to financial assets and financial liabilities related to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities lending and securities borrowing transactions. The
54
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
disclosures required by ASU 2011-11, to the extent applicable to the fund, have been included in the fund’s Significant Accounting Policies note under the captions for each of the fund’s in-scope financial instruments and transactions.
In June 2013, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-08 Financial Services – Investment Companies (Topic 946) – Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2013-08”) which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. ASU 2013-08 sets forth a methodology for determining whether an entity should be characterized as an investment company and prescribes fair value accounting for an investment company’s non-controlling ownership interest in another investment company. FASB has determined that a fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 automatically meets ASU 2013-08’s criteria for an investment company. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2013-08 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures contracts are primarily traded. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the
55
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. The following is a summary of the levels used as of July 31, 2013 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments at Value | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Municipal Bonds | | | $— | | | | $2,292,022,747 | | | | $— | | | | $2,292,022,747 | |
Short Term Securities | | | — | | | | 6,100,000 | | | | — | | | | 6,100,000 | |
Mutual Funds | | | 39,104,487 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 39,104,487 | |
Total Investments | | | $39,104,487 | | | | $2,298,122,747 | | | | $— | | | | $2,337,227,234 | |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate exposure, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
The derivative instruments used by the fund were futures contracts. At July 31, 2013, the fund did not have any outstanding derivative instruments.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | |
Risk | | Futures Contracts | |
Interest Rate | | | $(2,765,682 | ) |
56
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
There is no change in unrealized gain (loss) from derivative transactions at period end.
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain, but not all, over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. Upon an event of default or a termination of the ISDA Master Agreement, the non-defaulting party has the right to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any.
Collateral and margin requirements differ by type of derivative. Margin requirements are set by the broker or clearing house for cleared derivatives (i.e., futures contracts, cleared swaps, and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, uncleared swap agreements, and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash that has been segregated to cover the fund’s collateral or margin obligations under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported separately in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities pledged as collateral or margin for the same purpose, if any, is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
The fund’s accounting policy with respect to balance sheet offsetting is that, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Futures Contracts – The fund entered into futures contracts which may be used to hedge against or obtain broad market exposure, interest rate exposure, or to manage duration. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures contracts is realized.
57
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The fund bears the risk of interest rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures contracts may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The fund’s maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.
Inverse Floaters – The fund invests in municipal inverse floating rate securities which are structured by the issuer (known as primary market inverse floating rate securities) or by an investment banker utilizing municipal bonds which have already been issued (known as secondary market inverse floating rate securities) to have variable rates of interest which typically move in the opposite direction of short term interest rates. A secondary market inverse floating rate security is created when an investment banker transfers a fixed rate municipal bond to a special purpose trust, and causes the trust to (a) issue floating rate certificates to third parties, in an amount equal to a fraction of the par amount of the deposited bonds (these certificates usually pay tax-exempt interest at short-term interest rates that typically reset weekly; and the certificate holders typically, on seven days notice, have the option to tender their certificates to the investment banker or another party for redemption at par plus accrued interest), and (b) issue inverse floating rate certificates (sometimes referred to as “inverse floaters”). If the holders of the inverse floaters transfer the municipal bonds to an investment banker for the purpose of depositing the municipal bonds into the special purpose trust, the inverse floating rate certificates that are issued by the trust are referred to as “self-deposited inverse floaters.” If the bonds held by the trust are purchased by the investment banker for deposit into the trust from someone other than the purchasers of the inverse floaters, the inverse floating rate certificates that are issued by the trust are referred to as “externally deposited inverse floaters.” Such self-deposited inverse floaters held by the fund are accounted for as secured borrowings, with the municipal bonds reflected in the investments of the fund and amounts owed to the holders of the floating rate certificates under the provisions of the trust, which amounts are paid solely from the assets of the trust, reflected as liabilities of the fund in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities under the caption, “Payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets”. The carrying value of the fund’s payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets as reported in the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities approximates its fair value. The value of the payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets as of the reporting date is considered level 2 under the fair value hierarchy disclosure. At July 31, 2013, the fund’s payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets was $77,009,795 and the interest rate on the floating rate certificates issued by the trust was 0.08%. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the average payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets was $87,138,389 at a weighted average interest rate of 0.14%. Interest expense and fees relate to interest payments made to the holders of certain floating rate certificates and associated fees, both of which are made from trust assets. Interest expense and fees are recorded as incurred. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, interest expense and
58
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
fees in connection with self-deposited inverse floaters were $323,003. Primary and externally deposited inverse floaters held by the fund are not accounted for as secured borrowings.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Legal fees and other related expenses incurred to preserve and protect the value of a security owned are added to the cost of the security; other legal fees are expensed. Capital infusions made directly to the security issuer, which are generally non-recurring, incurred to protect or enhance the value of high-yield debt securities, are reported as additions to the cost basis of the security. Costs that are incurred to negotiate the terms or conditions of capital infusions or that are expected to result in a plan of reorganization are reported as realized losses. Ongoing costs incurred to protect or enhance an investment, or costs incurred to pursue other claims or legal actions, are expensed.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended July 31, 2013, is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period.
59
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to expiration of capital loss carryforwards, amortization and accretion of debt securities, and defaulted bonds.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
| | | | |
| | 1/31/13 | |
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) (a) | | | $219,307 | |
Tax-exempt income | | | 119,540,462 | |
Total distributions | | | $119,759,769 | |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
| | | | |
As of 7/31/13 | | | |
Cost of investments | | | $2,245,009,687 | |
Gross appreciation | | | 108,055,282 | |
Gross depreciation | | | (92,847,530 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | $15,207,752 | |
| |
As of 1/31/13 | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | | 2,660,724 | |
Undistributed tax-exempt income | | | 18,682,594 | |
Capital loss carryforwards | | | (118,748,448 | ) |
Other temporary differences | | | (15,229,430 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 238,893,297 | |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized for fund fiscal years beginning after January 31, 2011 may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses (“post-enactment losses”). Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses (“pre-enactment losses”). As a transition rule, the Act requires that all post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
60
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
As of January 31, 2013 the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains as follows:
| | | | |
Pre-enactment losses which expire as follows: | |
1/31/14 | | | $(10,798,317 | ) |
1/31/15 | | | (230,213 | ) |
1/31/17 | | | (18,935,036 | ) |
1/31/18 | | | (28,497,487 | ) |
1/31/19 | | | (16,085,714 | ) |
Total | | | $(74,546,767 | ) |
|
Post-enactment losses which are characterized as follows: | |
Long-Term | | | (44,201,681 | ) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution and service fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B shares will convert to Class A shares approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | From net investment income | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Year ended 1/31/13 | |
Class A | | | $45,500,674 | | | | $90,929,910 | |
Class B | | | 950,287 | | | | 1,971,689 | |
Class C | | | 5,278,819 | | | | 9,854,319 | |
Class I | | | 10,125,057 | | | | 17,003,851 | |
Total | | | $61,854,837 | | | | $119,759,769 | |
(3) Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.55% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Effective April 1, 2013, MFS has agreed in writing to reduce its management fee by a specified amount if certain MFS mutual fund assets exceed thresholds agreed to by MFS and the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the period April 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013, this management fee reduction amounted to $4,826, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The management fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.55% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
61
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Effective August 1, 2013, the investment adviser has agreed in writing to reduce its management fee to 0.50% of average daily net assets in excess of $2.5 billion. This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until May 31, 2015.
The investment adviser has agreed in writing to pay a portion of the fund’s operating expenses, exclusive of management fee, distribution and service fees, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs and investment-related expenses (including interest expenses and fees associates with investments in inverse floating rate instruments), such that fund operating expenses do not exceed 0.12% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until May, 31, 2015. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, this reduction amounted to $260,669 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $390,881 for the six months ended July 31, 2013, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the fund.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Distribution Fee Rate (d) | | | Service Fee Rate (d) | | | Total Distribution Plan (d) | | | Annual Effective Rate (e) | | | Distribution and Service Fee | |
Class B | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 0.81% | | | | $247,329 | |
Class C | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1,446,120 | |
Total Distribution and Service Fees | | | | $1,693,449 | |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’s average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended July 31, 2013 based on each class’s average daily net assets. For one year from the date of sale of Class B shares, assets attributable to such Class B shares are subject to the 0.25% annual Class B service fee. On assets attributable to all other Class B shares, MFD has agreed in writing to waive the service fee. This agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until May 31, 2014. For the six months ended July 31, 2013 this waiver amounted to $47,557 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Effective January 1, 2013, MFD has voluntarily agreed to rebate a portion of each class’s 0.25% service fee attributable to accounts for which MFD retains the 0.25% service fee except for accounts attributable to MFS or its subsidiaries’ seed money. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, this rebate amounted to $615 for Class C and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. |
62
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 18 months of purchase for shares purchased on or after August 1, 2012, and within 24 months of purchase for shares purchased prior to August 1, 2012. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended July 31, 2013, were as follows:
| | | | |
| | Amount | |
Class A | | | $34,980 | |
Class B | | | 22,639 | |
Class C | | | 22,486 | |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the fee was $143,687, which equated to 0.0105% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $1,169,350.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0128% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. Effective January 1, 2002, accrued benefits under the DB plan for then-current independent Trustees who continued were credited to an unfunded retirement deferral plan (the “Retirement Deferral plan”), which was established for and exists solely with respect to these credited amounts, and is not available for other deferrals by these or other
63
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
independent Trustees. Although the Retirement Deferral plan is unfunded, amounts deferred under the plan are periodically adjusted for investment experience as if they had been invested in shares of the fund. The DB plan resulted in a pension expense of $965 and is included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the six months ended July 31, 2013. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under the DB plan amounted to $15,745 at July 31, 2013, and is included in “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $11,187 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $5,204, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” in the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
(4) Portfolio Securities
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $291,292,274 and $658,613,945, respectively.
(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Year ended 1/31/13 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares sold | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 26,572,333 | | | | $218,408,868 | | | | 77,446,475 | | | | $631,600,689 | |
Class B | | | 206,723 | | | | 1,685,898 | | | | 1,560,561 | | | | 12,666,747 | |
Class C | | | 2,857,683 | | | | 23,564,196 | | | | 10,244,740 | | | | 83,574,613 | |
Class I | | | 12,967,451 | | | | 106,041,129 | | | | 44,084,898 | | | | 354,412,627 | |
| | | 42,604,190 | | | | $349,700,091 | | | | 133,336,674 | | | | $1,082,254,676 | |
64
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended 7/31/13 | | | Year ended 1/31/13 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 4,716,354 | | | | $38,184,990 | | | | 8,787,195 | | | | $71,841,720 | |
Class B | | | 90,805 | | | | 734,624 | | | | 169,750 | | | | 1,390,465 | |
Class C | | | 457,971 | | | | 3,702,145 | | | | 765,766 | | | | 6,270,849 | |
Class I | | | 834,247 | | | | 6,732,690 | | | | 1,169,986 | | | | 9,586,672 | |
| | | 6,099,377 | | | | $49,354,449 | | | | 10,892,697 | | | | $89,089,706 | |
| | | | |
Shares reacquired | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (76,654,214 | ) | | | $(627,571,344 | ) | | | (62,613,958 | ) | | | $(506,922,106 | ) |
Class B | | | (1,001,800 | ) | | | (8,051,492 | ) | | | (1,464,551 | ) | | | (11,942,059 | ) |
Class C | | | (5,362,360 | ) | | | (43,139,404 | ) | | | (5,100,089 | ) | | | (41,812,559 | ) |
Class I | | | (20,729,559 | ) | | | (165,788,450 | ) | | | (10,327,519 | ) | | | (84,779,586 | ) |
| | | (103,747,933 | ) | | | $(844,550,690 | ) | | | (79,506,117 | ) | | | $(645,456,310 | ) |
| | | | |
Net change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (45,365,527 | ) | | | $(370,977,486 | ) | | | 23,619,712 | | | | $196,520,303 | |
Class B | | | (704,272 | ) | | | (5,630,970 | ) | | | 265,760 | | | | 2,115,153 | |
Class C | | | (2,046,706 | ) | | | (15,873,063 | ) | | | 5,910,417 | | | | 48,032,903 | |
Class I | | | (6,927,861 | ) | | | (53,014,631 | ) | | | 34,927,365 | | | | 279,219,713 | |
| | | (55,044,366 | ) | | | $(445,496,150 | ) | | | 64,723,254 | | | | $525,888,072 | |
(6) Line of Credit
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $7,522 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations.
65
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be an affiliated issuer:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Fund | | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | | | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | | | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | | | Ending Shares/Par Amount | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | 111,057,169 | | | | 492,753,899 | | | | (564,706,581 | ) | | | 39,104,487 | |
| | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Fund | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | | Capital Gain Distributions | | | Dividend Income | | | Ending Value | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | $— | | | | $— | | | | $30,086 | | | | $39,104,487 | |
66
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2013 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2012 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense
67
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 1st quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile for the one-year period and the 1st quintile for the five-year period ended December 31, 2012 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS currently observes an expense limitation for the Fund, which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate was approximately at the Lipper expense group median, and the Fund’s total expense ratio was lower than the Lipper expense group median.
68
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to any comparable institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund may benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund and/or growth in assets of the MFS Funds as a whole. They noted that MFS has agreed in writing to reduce its advisory fee on the Fund’s average daily net assets over $2.5 billion, which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also noted that MFS has agreed in writing to waive a portion of the management fees of certain MFS Funds, including the Fund, if the total combined assets of certain funds within the MFS Funds’ complex increase above agreed upon thresholds (the “group fee waiver”), enabling the Fund’s shareholders to share in the benefits from any economies of scale at the complex level. The group fee waiver is reviewed and renewed annually between the Board and MFS. The Trustees concluded that the breakpoint and the group fee waiver were sufficient to allow the Fund to benefit from economies of scale as its assets and overall complex assets grow.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS
69
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2013.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
70
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
FURTHER INFORMATION
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.
PROVISION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS AND SUMMARY PROSPECTUSES
The fund produces financial reports every six months and updates its summary prospectus and prospectus annually. To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, only one copy of the fund’s annual and semiannual report and summary prospectus may be mailed to shareholders having the same last name and residential address on the fund’s records. However, any shareholder may contact MFSC (please see back cover for address and telephone number) to request that copies of these reports and summary prospectuses be sent personally to that shareholder.
71
Save paper with eDelivery.
| MFS® will send you prospectuses, |
reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter.
To sign up:
1. Go to mfs.com.
2. Log in via MFS® Access.
3. Select eDelivery.
If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS® Access, or eDelivery may not be available to you.
CONTACT
WEB SITE
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
ACCOUNT SERVICE AND LITERATURE
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Financial advisors
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
MAILING ADDRESS
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
OVERNIGHT MAIL
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
SEMIANNUAL REPORT
July 31, 2013
MFS® HIGH YIELD POOLED PORTFOLIO
HYP-SEM
MFS® HIGH YIELD POOLED PORTFOLIO
CONTENTS
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders.
It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholders:
The U.S. economy continues to grow, albeit at a modest pace, possibly helping to gently lift other regions out of a prolonged slump. The resilience of the U.S. housing
market and improved jobs picture continues to offset the drag created by the government’s sequestration and rise in taxes. Going forward, much could hinge on how much cooperation and bipartisanship the U.S. Congress can achieve, as yet another fiscal showdown looms later in 2013.
China is shifting gears from being the engine of global growth because of its rapid consumption of commodities. Commodity-exporting countries are feeling the squeeze from China’s economic focus being turned toward domestic consumers and its overall pace of growth slowing. Japan’s recent economic reports indicate that its 15-year period of stagnant
growth and deflation could be ending, while the eurozone is showing signs of a pickup in economic growth after two years of recession. These recent positive signs in Japan and Europe point to a possible broadening base of global growth that could help take the burden off China and the United States as the main engines of global activity.
As always, managing risk in the face of uncertainty remains a top priority for investors. At MFS®, our uniquely collaborative investment process employs integrated, global research and active risk management. Our global team of investment professionals shares ideas and evaluates opportunities across continents, investment disciplines and asset classes — all with a goal of building better insights, and ultimately better results, for our clients.
We are mindful of the many economic challenges investors face, and believe it is more important than ever to maintain a long-term view and employ time-tested principles, such as asset allocation and diversification. We remain confident that our unique approach can serve investors well as they work with their financial advisors to identify and pursue the most suitable opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
September 16, 2013
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio structure (i)
| | | | |
Top five industries (i) | | | | |
Energy-Independent | | | 8.1% | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services | | | 5.6% | |
Broadcasting | | | 5.1% | |
Telecommunications-Wireless | | | 4.0% | |
Automotive | | | 3.9% | |
| | | | |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | | | | |
A (o) | | | 0.0% | |
BBB | | | 3.4% | |
BB | | | 37.6% | |
B | | | 43.4% | |
CCC | | | 13.2% | |
Not Rated | | | 1.5% | |
Non-Fixed Income | | | 1.6% | |
Cash & Other | | | (0.7)% | |
| |
Portfolio facts (i) | | | | |
Average Duration (d) | | | 4.2 | |
Average Effective Maturity (m) | | | 6.8 yrs. | |
(a) | For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Non-Fixed Income includes equity securities (including convertible bonds and equity derivatives) and commodities. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
2
Portfolio Composition – continued
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
From time to time “Cash & Other Net Assets” may be negative due to timing of cash receipts and/or equivalent exposure from any derivative holdings.
Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio.
Percentages are based on net assets as of 7/31/13.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
EXPENSE TABLE
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period, March 25, 2013 through July 31, 2013
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur ongoing costs, including fund expenses.
This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period March 25, 2013 through July 31, 2013.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line of the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
4
Expense Table – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Annualized Expense Ratio | | | Beginning Account Value 3/25/13 | | | Ending Account Value 7/31/13 | | | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 3/25/13-7/31/13 | |
Actual | | | 0.02% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,006.35 | | | | $0.07 | |
Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.02% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,024.70 | | | | $0.10 | |
(h) | 5% fund return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. For hypothetical expenses paid, it is assumed that the fund was in existence for the entire six month period ended July 31, 2013. For actual expenses paid, the calculation is based on the period from the commencement of the fund’s investment operations, March 25, 2013, through the period end, July 31, 2013. |
5
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
7/31/13 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
| | | | | | | | |
Bonds - 94.1% | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Aerospace - 2.3% | | | | | | | | |
Bombardier, Inc., 4.25%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 1,365,000 | | | $ | 1,416,188 | |
Bombardier, Inc., 7.5%, 2018 (n) | | | 4,435,000 | | | | 5,011,550 | |
Bombardier, Inc., 7.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,995,000 | | | | 3,421,788 | |
CPI International, Inc., 8%, 2018 | | | 3,355,000 | | | | 3,447,219 | |
Heckler & Koch GmbH, 9.5%, 2018 (z) | | EUR | 1,708,000 | | | | 2,079,325 | |
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 7.125%, 2021 | | $ | 4,810,000 | | | | 5,291,000 | |
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., 10%, 2017 | | | 4,355,000 | | | | 4,703,400 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 25,370,470 | |
Apparel Manufacturers - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Hanesbrands, Inc., 6.375%, 2020 | | $ | 2,690,000 | | | $ | 2,948,913 | |
Jones Group, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 | | | 2,350,000 | | | | 2,426,375 | |
PVH Corp., 7.375%, 2020 | | | 3,105,000 | | | | 3,403,856 | |
PVH Corp., 4.5%, 2022 | | | 1,820,000 | | | | 1,779,050 | |
Quiksilver, Inc., 10%, 2020 (z) | | | 230,000 | | | | 237,475 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,795,669 | |
Automotive - 3.7% | | | | | | | | |
Accuride Corp., 9.5%, 2018 | | $ | 4,515,000 | | | $ | 4,678,669 | |
Allison Transmission, Inc., 7.125%, 2019 (n) | | | 4,885,000 | | | | 5,214,738 | |
Continental Rubber of America Corp., 4.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 630,000 | | | | 640,548 | |
Delphi Corp., 5%, 2023 | | | 2,735,000 | | | | 2,844,400 | |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 12%, 2015 | | | 392,000 | | | | 461,251 | |
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 8.125%, 2020 | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,967,202 | |
General Motors Financial Co., Inc., 4.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,465,000 | | | | 1,536,419 | |
General Motors Financial Co., Inc., 6.75%, 2018 | | | 3,120,000 | | | | 3,478,800 | |
General Motors Financial Co., Inc., 4.25%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,070,000 | | | | 1,027,200 | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 685,000 | | | | 763,775 | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 3,410,000 | | | | 3,567,713 | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 7%, 2022 | | | 1,110,000 | | | | 1,179,375 | |
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 7.75%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,260,000 | | | | 2,463,400 | |
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 8.125%, 2021 (n) | | | 4,605,000 | | | | 5,100,038 | |
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 5.625%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,360,000 | | | | 1,332,800 | |
Lear Corp., 8.125%, 2020 | | | 1,637,000 | | | | 1,804,793 | |
Lear Corp., 4.75%, 2023 (n) | | | 755,000 | | | | 739,900 | |
LKQ Corp., 4.75%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,220,000 | | | | 1,169,675 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 39,970,696 | |
6
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Broadcasting - 5.0% | | | | | | | | |
Allbritton Communications Co., 8%, 2018 | | $ | 1,310,000 | | | $ | 1,416,438 | |
AMC Networks, Inc., 7.75%, 2021 | | | 4,350,000 | | | | 4,872,000 | |
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., 9%, 2021 | | | 3,483,000 | | | | 3,430,755 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., 6.5%, 2022 | | | 745,000 | | | | 771,075 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., 6.5%, 2022 | | | 2,570,000 | | | | 2,685,650 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., “A”, 7.625%, 2020 | | | 140,000 | | | | 146,300 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., “B”, 7.625%, 2020 | | | 1,390,000 | | | | 1,466,450 | |
Hughes Network Systems LLC, 7.625%, 2021 | | | 1,745,000 | | | | 1,888,963 | |
IAC/InterActive Corp., 4.75%, 2022 | | | 870,000 | | | | 822,150 | |
Inmarsat Finance PLC, 7.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,130,000 | | | | 2,241,825 | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A., 6.625%, 2022 (n) | | | 3,520,000 | | | | 3,599,200 | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A., 6.625%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,240,000 | | | | 1,267,900 | |
Intelsat S.A., 8.125%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,455,000 | | | | 2,639,125 | |
LBI Media, Inc., 13.5% to 2015, 11.5% to 2020 (p)(z) | | | 1,196,098 | | | | 418,634 | |
Liberty Media Corp., 8.5%, 2029 | | | 2,790,000 | | | | 3,072,488 | |
Liberty Media Corp., 8.25%, 2030 | | | 1,215,000 | | | | 1,313,719 | |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 (p)(z) | | | 2,435,088 | | | | 2,471,614 | |
Netflix, Inc., 5.375%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,115,000 | | | | 2,136,150 | |
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., 8.875%, 2017 | | | 1,035,000 | | | | 1,120,388 | |
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., 6.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 975,000 | | | | 1,009,125 | |
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., 9.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,540,000 | | | | 1,632,400 | |
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., 8.375%, 2018 | | | 345,000 | | | | 373,463 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 8.75%, 2015 (n) | | | 2,015,000 | | | | 2,271,913 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 7.625%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,615,000 | | | | 2,883,038 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 4.25%, 2020 (n) | | | 650,000 | | | | 604,500 | |
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 5.25%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,430,000 | | | | 1,383,525 | |
Univision Communications, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,200,000 | | | | 2,348,500 | |
Univision Communications, Inc., 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,890,000 | | | | 2,074,275 | |
Univision Communications, Inc., 8.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,170,000 | | | | 2,387,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 54,748,563 | |
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
E*TRADE Financial Corp., 6.375%, 2019 | | $ | 6,420,000 | | | $ | 6,821,250 | |
| | |
Building - 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
ABC Supply Co., Inc., 5.625%, 2021 (n) | | $ | 575,000 | | | $ | 573,563 | |
Boise Cascade Co., 6.375%, 2020 | | | 2,045,000 | | | | 2,114,019 | |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 6.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,704,000 | |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 7%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,925,000 | | | | 2,059,750 | |
Building Materials Holding Corp., 6.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,530,000 | | | | 1,637,100 | |
CEMEX Espana S.A., 9.25%, 2020 | | | 1,405,000 | | | | 1,534,963 | |
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 5.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 202,000 | | | | 202,000 | |
Gibraltar Industries, Inc., 6.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 870,000 | | | | 891,750 | |
7
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Building - continued | | | | | | | | |
HD Supply, Inc., 8.125%, 2019 | | $ | 1,630,000 | | | $ | 1,825,600 | |
HD Supply, Inc., 11.5%, 2020 | | | 2,415,000 | | | | 2,864,794 | |
Nortek, Inc., 8.5%, 2021 | | | 4,470,000 | | | | 4,838,775 | |
Roofing Supply Group LLC/Roofing Supply Finance, Inc., 10%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,952,000 | | | | 2,147,200 | |
USG Corp., 6.3%, 2016 | | | 3,782,000 | | | | 3,914,370 | |
USG Corp., 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 1,478,513 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 27,786,397 | |
Business Services - 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
Equinix, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | | $ | 3,070,000 | | | $ | 3,039,300 | |
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., 5%, 2022 | | | 3,305,000 | | | | 3,379,363 | |
iGATE Corp., 9%, 2016 | | | 3,670,000 | | | | 3,959,013 | |
Iron Mountain, Inc., 8.375%, 2021 | | | 3,800,000 | | | | 4,118,250 | |
Legend Acquisition Sub, Inc., 10.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,540,000 | | | | 1,262,800 | |
Neustar, Inc., 4.5%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,055,000 | | | | 1,921,425 | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., 7.375%, 2018 | | | 910,000 | | | | 964,600 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 18,644,751 | |
Cable TV - 3.5% | | | | | | | | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 8.125%, 2020 | | $ | 3,970,000 | | | $ | 4,317,375 | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 7.375%, 2020 | | | 705,000 | | | | 759,638 | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 6.5%, 2021 | | | 4,500,000 | | | | 4,623,750 | |
CCO Holdings LLC, 5.125%, 2023 | | | 2,025,000 | | | | 1,852,875 | |
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Capital Corp., 5.75%, 2024 | | | 1,315,000 | | | | 1,229,525 | |
Cequel Communications Holdings, 6.375%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,350,000 | | | | 2,426,375 | |
DISH DBS Corp., 6.75%, 2021 | | | 2,540,000 | | | | 2,692,400 | |
DISH DBS Corp., 5%, 2023 | | | 1,365,000 | | | | 1,279,688 | |
EchoStar Corp., 7.125%, 2016 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,737,500 | |
Lynx I Corp., 5.375%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,390,000 | | | | 1,407,375 | |
Lynx II Corp., 6.375%, 2023 (n) | | | 800,000 | | | | 821,000 | |
Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, 6.25%, 2021 (z) | | | 235,000 | | | | 236,175 | |
Nara Cable Funding Ltd., 8.875%, 2018 (z) | | | 840,000 | | | | 882,000 | |
Telenet Finance Luxembourg, 6.375%, 2020 (n) | | EUR | 1,510,000 | | | | 2,113,288 | |
Unitymedia Hessen, 5.5%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 370,000 | | | | 359,825 | |
UPC Holding B.V., 9.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 3,555,000 | | | | 3,874,950 | |
UPCB Finance III Ltd., 6.625%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,628,000 | | | | 3,881,960 | |
Virgin Media Finance PLC, 8.375%, 2019 | | | 241,000 | | | | 262,088 | |
Ziggo Bond Co. B.V., 8%, 2018 (n) | | EUR | 1,895,000 | | | | 2,697,484 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 38,455,271 | |
Chemicals - 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
Celanese U.S. Holdings LLC, 6.625%, 2018 | | $ | 3,755,000 | | | $ | 4,008,463 | |
Flash Dutch 2 B.V./U.S. Coatings Acquisition, 7.375%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,015,000 | | | | 1,051,794 | |
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp., 6.625%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,022,500 | |
8
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Chemicals - continued | | | | | | | | |
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, 8.875%, 2018 | | $ | 1,860,000 | | | $ | 1,934,400 | |
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, 9%, 2020 | | | 1,630,000 | | | | 1,650,375 | |
Huntsman International LLC, 8.625%, 2021 | | | 4,095,000 | | | | 4,617,113 | |
INEOS Finance PLC, 8.375%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,290,000 | | | | 3,610,775 | |
INEOS Group Holdings S.A., 6.125%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,035,000 | | | | 1,984,125 | |
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., 5%, 2019 | | | 1,535,000 | | | | 1,699,518 | |
NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5.25%, 2023 (z) | | | 1,410,000 | | | | 1,410,000 | |
Polypore International, Inc., 7.5%, 2017 | | | 1,450,000 | | | | 1,529,750 | |
Tronox Finance LLC, 6.375%, 2020 (z) | | | 1,435,000 | | | | 1,374,013 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 25,892,826 | |
Computer Software - 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Infor U.S., Inc., 11.5%, 2018 | | $ | 1,940,000 | | | $ | 2,235,850 | |
Nuance Communications, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 (n) | | | 960,000 | | | | 936,000 | |
Syniverse Holdings, Inc., 9.125%, 2019 | | | 4,140,000 | | | | 4,471,200 | |
TransUnion Holding Co., Inc., 9.625%, 2018 | | | 1,110,000 | | | | 1,204,350 | |
TransUnion LLC/TransUnion Financing Corp., 11.375%, 2018 | | | 915,000 | | | | 1,028,231 | |
Verisign, Inc., 4.625%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,830,000 | | | | 1,756,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,632,431 | |
Computer Software - Systems - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Audatex North America, Inc., 6.75%, 2018 | | $ | 2,070,000 | | | $ | 2,209,725 | |
Audatex North America, Inc., 6%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,485,000 | | | | 1,510,988 | |
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 12.535%, 2017 | | | 741,000 | | | | 781,755 | |
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 8.5%, 2019 | | | 2,920,000 | | | | 3,204,700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,707,168 | |
Conglomerates - 1.9% | | | | | | | | |
Amsted Industries, Inc., 8.125%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 4,580,000 | | | $ | 4,866,250 | |
BC Mountain LLC, 7%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,685,000 | | | | 1,752,400 | |
Dynacast International LLC, 9.25%, 2019 | | | 1,875,000 | | | | 2,053,125 | |
Griffon Corp., 7.125%, 2018 | | | 3,200,000 | | | | 3,368,000 | |
Renaissance Acquisition, 6.875%, 2021 (z) | | | 2,920,000 | | | | 2,905,400 | |
Rexel S.A., 6.125%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,180,000 | | | | 2,261,750 | |
Rexel S.A., 5.25%, 2020 (n) | | | 595,000 | | | | 592,025 | |
Silver II Borrower, 7.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,925,000 | | | | 3,063,938 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 20,862,888 | |
Construction - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Empresas ICA Sociedad Controladora S.A. de C.V., 8.9%, 2021 | | $ | 665,000 | | | $ | 618,450 | |
9
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Products - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Elizabeth Arden, Inc., 7.375%, 2021 | | $ | 2,872,000 | | | $ | 3,101,760 | |
Jarden Corp., 7.5%, 2020 | | | 2,515,000 | | | | 2,700,481 | |
Libbey Glass, Inc., 6.875%, 2020 | | | 795,000 | | | | 850,650 | |
Prestige Brands, Inc., 8.125%, 2020 | | | 1,240,000 | | | | 1,367,100 | |
Spectrum Brands Escrow Corp., 6.375%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,245,000 | | | | 2,385,313 | |
Spectrum Brands Escrow Corp., 6.625%, 2022 (n) | | | 210,000 | | | | 224,700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,630,004 | |
Consumer Services - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
QVC, Inc., 7.375%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 1,925,000 | | | $ | 2,101,779 | |
Service Corp. International, 7%, 2017 | | | 3,515,000 | | | | 3,892,863 | |
Service Corp. International, 7%, 2019 | | | 1,085,000 | | | | 1,167,731 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,162,373 | |
Containers - 3.1% | | | | | | | | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC , 7%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 950,000 | | | $ | 935,750 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 7.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,335,000 | | | | 2,483,856 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 9.125%, 2020 (n) | | | 400,000 | | | | 434,000 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 9.125%, 2020 (n) | | | 4,480,000 | | | | 4,838,400 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 4.875%, 2022 (z) | | | 790,000 | | | | 768,275 | |
Ball Corp., 5%, 2022 | | | 1,008,000 | | | | 1,010,520 | |
Ball Corp., 4%, 2023 | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 1,221,525 | |
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., 9.5%, 2018 | | | 1,030,000 | | | | 1,117,550 | |
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., 9.75%, 2021 | | | 2,285,000 | | | | 2,673,450 | |
Crown Americas LLC, 4.5%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,315,000 | | | | 2,158,738 | |
Greif, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | | | 2,090,000 | | | | 2,309,450 | |
Greif, Inc., 7.75%, 2019 | | | 980,000 | | | | 1,117,200 | |
Reynolds Group, 7.125%, 2019 | | | 3,095,000 | | | | 3,303,913 | |
Reynolds Group, 9.875%, 2019 | | | 1,355,000 | | | | 1,463,400 | |
Reynolds Group, 5.75%, 2020 | | | 2,050,000 | | | | 2,085,875 | |
Reynolds Group, 8.25%, 2021 | | | 5,660,000 | | | | 5,759,050 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 33,680,952 | |
Defense Electronics - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Ducommun, Inc., 9.75%, 2018 | | $ | 2,452,000 | | | $ | 2,721,720 | |
MOOG, Inc., 7.25%, 2018 | | | 1,615,000 | | | | 1,671,525 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,393,245 | |
Electrical Equipment - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Avaya, Inc., 9.75%, 2015 | | $ | 1,180,000 | | | $ | 1,156,400 | |
Avaya, Inc., 7%, 2019 (n) | | | 665,000 | | | | 613,463 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,769,863 | |
10
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Electronics - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 9.25%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 3,825,000 | | | $ | 4,145,344 | |
Nokia Corp., 5.375%, 2019 | | | 995,000 | | | | 970,125 | |
Nokia Corp., 6.625%, 2039 | | | 1,015,000 | | | | 893,200 | |
NXP B.V., 9.75%, 2018 (n) | | | 149,000 | | | | 166,135 | |
NXP B.V., 5.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 640,000 | | | | 657,600 | |
NXP B.V., 5.75%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,095,000 | | | | 2,115,950 | |
Sensata Technologies B.V., 6.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,320,000 | | | | 3,552,400 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,500,754 | |
Energy - Independent - 7.8% | | | | | | | | |
Berry Petroleum Corp., 6.75%, 2020 | | $ | 685,000 | | | $ | 708,975 | |
BreitBurn Energy Partners LP, 8.625%, 2020 | | | 1,075,000 | | | | 1,144,875 | |
Breitburn Energy Partners LP, 7.875%, 2022 | | | 3,395,000 | | | | 3,420,463 | |
Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc., 8.625%, 2018 | | | 1,055,000 | | | | 1,152,588 | |
Chaparral Energy, Inc., 7.625%, 2022 | | | 2,135,000 | | | | 2,183,038 | |
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 6.875%, 2020 | | | 2,980,000 | | | | 3,263,100 | |
Concho Resources, Inc., 6.5%, 2022 | | | 3,440,000 | | | | 3,680,800 | |
Concho Resources, Inc., 5.5%, 2023 | | | 2,845,000 | | | | 2,837,888 | |
Continental Resources, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | | | 2,860,000 | | | | 3,131,700 | |
Continental Resources, Inc., 7.375%, 2020 | | | 490,000 | | | | 543,900 | |
Continental Resources, Inc., 4.5%, 2023 | | | 2,253,000 | | | | 2,191,043 | |
Denbury Resources, Inc., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 4,185,000 | | | | 4,603,500 | |
Denbury Resources, Inc., 4.625%, 2023 | | | 1,065,000 | | | | 974,475 | |
Energy XXI Gulf Coast, Inc., 9.25%, 2017 | | | 3,990,000 | | | | 4,428,900 | |
EP Energy LLC, 9.375%, 2020 | | | 5,295,000 | | | | 6,009,825 | |
EP Energy LLC, 7.75%, 2022 | | | 3,205,000 | | | | 3,525,500 | |
EPL Oil & Gas, Inc., 8.25%, 2018 | | | 2,270,000 | | | | 2,394,850 | |
Halcon Resources Corp., 8.875%, 2021 | | | 3,560,000 | | | | 3,595,600 | |
Harvest Operations Corp., 6.875%, 2017 | | | 4,165,000 | | | | 4,591,913 | |
Hilcorp Energy I/Hilcorp Finance Co., 8%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,670,000 | | | | 1,809,863 | |
Laredo Petroleum, Inc., 9.5%, 2019 | | | 2,210,000 | | | | 2,453,100 | |
LINN Energy LLC, 8.625%, 2020 | | | 740,000 | | | | 769,600 | |
LINN Energy LLC, 7.75%, 2021 | | | 3,044,000 | | | | 3,074,440 | |
MEG Energy Corp., 6.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,955,000 | | | | 1,994,100 | |
QEP Resources, Inc., 6.875%, 2021 | | | 3,395,000 | | | | 3,785,425 | |
Range Resources Corp., 8%, 2019 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,350,000 | |
Range Resources Corp., 5%, 2022 | | | 2,620,000 | | | | 2,646,200 | |
Rosetta Resources, Inc., 5.625%, 2021 | | | 1,085,000 | | | | 1,085,000 | |
Samson Investment Co., 10%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,265,000 | | | | 3,460,900 | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., 8.125%, 2022 | | | 2,905,000 | | | | 2,948,575 | |
SM Energy Co., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 2,905,000 | | | | 3,079,300 | |
Whiting Petroleum Corp., 6.5%, 2018 | | | 2,270,000 | | | | 2,406,200 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 85,245,636 | |
11
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Engineering - Construction - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
BakerCorp International, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | | $ | 2,500,000 | | | $ | 2,518,750 | |
| | |
Entertainment - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
AMC Entertainment, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 | | $ | 1,605,000 | | | $ | 1,737,413 | |
Cedar Fair LP, 9.125%, 2018 | | | 1,585,000 | | | | 1,747,463 | |
Cedar Fair LP, 5.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 1,304,963 | |
Cinemark USA, Inc., 4.875%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,620,000 | | | | 1,530,900 | |
Cinemark USA, Inc., 5.125%, 2022 | | | 535,000 | | | | 515,606 | |
NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC, 8.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 981,000 | | | | 1,065,366 | |
NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC, 5%, 2018 (z) | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 1,317,875 | |
Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 5.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 3,490,000 | | | | 3,411,475 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,631,061 | |
Financial Institutions - 5.2% | | | | | | | | |
Aviation Capital Group, 4.625%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 3,015,000 | | | $ | 3,028,064 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5.25%, 2014 (n) | | | 1,360,000 | | | | 1,387,200 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5.25%, 2018 | | | 2,875,000 | | | | 3,054,688 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 6.625%, 2018 (n) | | | 5,026,000 | | | | 5,553,730 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5.5%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,342,000 | | | | 3,504,923 | |
CIT Group, Inc., 5%, 2022 | | | 1,950,000 | | | | 1,932,938 | |
Credit Acceptance Corp., 9.125%, 2017 | | | 2,010,000 | | | | 2,145,675 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 7.75%, 2016 | | | 680,000 | | | | 706,350 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 8%, 2018 | | | 3,922,000 | | | | 4,142,613 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 6%, 2020 (z) | | | 1,530,000 | | | | 1,530,000 | |
International Lease Finance Corp., 4.875%, 2015 | | | 1,120,000 | | | | 1,153,600 | |
International Lease Finance Corp., 8.625%, 2015 | | | 1,130,000 | | | | 1,251,475 | |
International Lease Finance Corp., 7.125%, 2018 (n) | | | 3,373,000 | | | | 3,803,058 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 10.875%, 2015 | | | 3,185,000 | | | | 3,348,231 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 6.5%, 2018 | | | 1,270,000 | | | | 1,282,700 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 9.625%, 2019 | | | 1,320,000 | | | | 1,485,000 | |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 7.875%, 2020 | | | 1,380,000 | | | | 1,480,050 | |
PHH Corp., 9.25%, 2016 | | | 1,620,000 | | | | 1,830,600 | |
PHH Corp., 7.375%, 2019 | | | 2,060,000 | | | | 2,258,275 | |
SLM Corp., 8.45%, 2018 | | | 2,310,000 | | | | 2,656,777 | |
SLM Corp., 8%, 2020 | | | 5,765,000 | | | | 6,427,975 | |
SLM Corp., 7.25%, 2022 | | | 2,410,000 | | | | 2,554,600 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 56,518,522 | |
Food & Beverages - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
ARAMARK Corp., 5.75%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 1,355,000 | | | $ | 1,409,200 | |
B&G Foods, Inc., 4.625%, 2021 | | | 1,295,000 | | | | 1,251,294 | |
Constellation Brands, Inc., 7.25%, 2016 | | | 1,175,000 | | | | 1,336,563 | |
Constellation Brands, Inc., 3.75%, 2021 | | | 430,000 | | | | 402,050 | |
12
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Food & Beverages - continued | | | | | | | | |
Constellation Brands, Inc., 4.25%, 2023 | | $ | 860,000 | | | $ | 810,550 | |
Hawk Acquisition Sub, Inc., 4.25%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,185,000 | | | | 2,097,600 | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC, 4.875%, 2021 (z) | | | 505,000 | | | | 473,438 | |
Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,203,000 | |
TreeHouse Foods, Inc., 7.75%, 2018 | | | 2,220,000 | | | | 2,364,300 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,347,995 | |
Forest & Paper Products - 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Boise, Inc., 8%, 2020 | | $ | 2,340,000 | | | $ | 2,515,500 | |
Graphic Packaging Holding Co., 7.875%, 2018 | | | 1,875,000 | | | | 2,039,063 | |
Sappi Papier Holding GmbH, 7.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,075,000 | | | | 1,128,750 | |
Smurfit Kappa Group PLC, 4.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,496,250 | |
Smurfit Kappa Group PLC, 7.75%, 2019 (n) | | EUR | 1,140,000 | | | | 1,656,247 | |
Tembec Industries, Inc., 11.25%, 2018 | | $ | 1,340,000 | | | | 1,453,900 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,289,710 | |
Gaming & Lodging - 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
Caesars Entertainment Operating Co., Inc., 8.5%, 2020 | | $ | 1,330,000 | | | $ | 1,238,563 | |
Chester Downs & Marina LLC, 9.25%, 2020 (z) | | | 1,450,000 | | | | 1,435,500 | |
Choice Hotels International, Inc., 5.75%, 2022 | | | 430,000 | | | | 451,500 | |
CityCenter Holdings LLC, 10.75%, 2017 (p) | | | 1,110,000 | | | | 1,198,800 | |
Fontainebleau Las Vegas Holdings LLC, 10.25%, 2015 (a)(d)(n) | | | 4,490,000 | | | | 2,806 | |
GWR Operating Partnership LLP, 10.875%, 2017 | | | 1,055,000 | | | | 1,180,281 | |
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., REIT, 5.25%, 2022 | | | 1,460,000 | | | | 1,520,802 | |
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., 8.875%, 2020 | | | 2,675,000 | | | | 2,808,750 | |
MGM Resorts International, 11.375%, 2018 | | | 3,400,000 | | | | 4,301,000 | |
MGM Resorts International, 6.625%, 2021 | | | 1,580,000 | | | | 1,666,900 | |
NCL Corp., 5%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,070,000 | | | | 1,067,325 | |
Peninsula Gaming LLC, 8.375%, 2018 (z) | | | 615,000 | | | | 665,738 | |
Penn National Gaming, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 | | | 3,083,000 | | | | 3,383,593 | |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 8.75%, 2020 | | | 2,130,000 | | | | 2,305,725 | |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 7.75%, 2022 | | | 920,000 | | | | 963,700 | |
PNK Finance Corp., 6.375%, 2021 (z) | | | 940,000 | | | | 947,050 | |
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., REIT, 5%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,105,000 | | | | 1,082,900 | |
Seven Seas Cruises S. DE R.L., 9.125%, 2019 | | | 3,845,000 | | | | 4,142,988 | |
Viking Cruises Ltd., 8.5%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,925,000 | | | | 2,122,313 | |
Wynn Las Vegas LLC, 7.75%, 2020 | | | 4,085,000 | | | | 4,595,625 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 37,081,859 | |
Industrial - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Dematic S.A., 7.75%, 2020 (z) | | $ | 4,995,000 | | | $ | 5,257,238 | |
Hyva Global B.V., 8.625%, 2016 (n) | | | 1,760,000 | | | | 1,597,200 | |
Mueller Water Products, Inc., 8.75%, 2020 | | | 1,461,000 | | | | 1,601,621 | |
13
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Industrial - continued | | | | | | | | |
SPL Logistics Escrow LLC, 8.875%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 2,675,000 | | | $ | 2,782,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,238,059 | |
Insurance - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
MetLife, Inc., 9.25% to 2038, FRN to 2068 (n) | | $ | 700,000 | | | $ | 931,000 | |
| | |
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 10.75% to 2038, FRN to 2088 (n) | | $ | 2,950,000 | | | $ | 4,498,750 | |
XL Group PLC, FRN, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2049 | | | 4,645,000 | | | | 4,563,713 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 9,062,463 | |
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 2016 | | $ | 170,000 | | | $ | 175,950 | |
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 2017 | | | 2,170,000 | | | | 2,248,663 | |
Electricite de France, FRN, 5.25%, 2049 (n) | | | 243,000 | | | | 232,369 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,656,982 | |
Machinery & Tools - 2.3% | | | | | | | | |
Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 2017 | | $ | 5,450,000 | | | $ | 6,390,125 | |
CNH America LLC, 7.25%, 2016 | | | 1,190,000 | | | | 1,303,050 | |
CNH Capital LLC, 3.875%, 2015 | | | 1,285,000 | | | | 1,320,338 | |
CNH Capital LLC, 6.25%, 2016 | | | 670,000 | | | | 731,975 | |
CNH Capital LLC, 3.625%, 2018 | | | 2,105,000 | | | | 2,068,163 | |
H&E Equipment Services Co., 7%, 2022 | | | 2,725,000 | | | | 2,915,750 | |
NESCO LLC/NESCO Holdings Corp., 11.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 3,440,000 | | | | 3,835,600 | |
RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., 8.25%, 2021 | | | 2,505,000 | | | | 2,799,338 | |
United Rentals North America, Inc., 5.75%, 2018 | | | 1,195,000 | | | | 1,278,650 | |
United Rentals North America, Inc., 7.625%, 2022 | | | 2,198,000 | | | | 2,450,770 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 25,093,759 | |
Major Banks - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Bank of America Corp., FRN, 5.2%, 2049 | | $ | 3,110,000 | | | $ | 2,799,000 | |
Barclays Bank PLC, 7.625%, 2022 | | | 2,965,000 | | | | 2,950,175 | |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 7.648% to 2031, FRN to 2049 | | | 4,955,000 | | | | 4,707,250 | |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC,, 6.99% to 2017, FRN to 2049 (n) | | | 905,000 | | | | 877,850 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,334,275 | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 5.4% | | | | | | | | |
AmSurg Corp., 5.625%, 2020 | | $ | 3,295,000 | | | $ | 3,360,900 | |
CDRT Holding Corp., 9.25%, 2017 (n)(p) | | | 665,000 | | | | 679,131 | |
Davita, Inc., 6.375%, 2018 | | | 4,650,000 | | | | 4,929,000 | |
Davita, Inc., 6.625%, 2020 | | | 4,110,000 | | | | 4,387,425 | |
14
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - continued | | | | | | | | |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, 9%, 2015 (n) | | $ | 1,180,000 | | | $ | 1,309,800 | |
Fresenius Medical Care Capital Trust III, 5.625%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,455,000 | | | | 3,657,981 | |
Fresenius Medical Care Capital Trust III, 5.875%, 2022 (n) | | | 1,375,000 | | | | 1,450,625 | |
HCA, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 | | | 5,680,000 | | | | 6,148,600 | |
HCA, Inc., 7.25%, 2020 | | | 2,795,000 | | | | 3,057,031 | |
HCA, Inc., 7.5%, 2022 | | | 5,140,000 | | | | 5,795,350 | |
HCA, Inc., 5.875%, 2022 | | | 2,960,000 | | | | 3,130,200 | |
HealthSouth Corp., 8.125%, 2020 | | | 4,780,000 | | | | 5,234,100 | |
IASIS Healthcare LLC/IASIS Capital Corp., 8.375%, 2019 | | | 2,385,000 | | | | 2,504,250 | |
Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 12.5%, 2019 | | | 665,000 | | | | 702,406 | |
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 9.25%, 2015 | | | 2,145,000 | | | | 2,338,050 | |
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 8%, 2020 | | | 2,895,000 | | | | 3,075,938 | |
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 4.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,230,000 | | | | 2,079,475 | |
Universal Health Services, Inc., 7%, 2018 | | | 1,715,000 | | | | 1,811,469 | |
Universal Health Services, Inc., 7.625%, 2020 | | | 3,495,000 | | | | 3,695,963 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 59,347,694 | |
Medical Equipment - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Biomet, Inc., 6.5%, 2020 | | $ | 1,885,000 | | | $ | 1,979,250 | |
Physio-Control International, Inc., 9.875%, 2019 (n) | | | 1,430,000 | | | | 1,587,300 | |
Teleflex, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 | | | 2,550,000 | | | | 2,703,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,269,550 | |
Metals & Mining - 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
ArcelorMittal S.A., 6.75%, 2041 | | $ | 1,735,000 | | | $ | 1,607,044 | |
Arch Coal, Inc., 7.25%, 2020 | | | 3,300,000 | | | | 2,673,000 | |
Boart Longyear Ltd., 7%, 2021 (z) | | | 595,000 | | | | 538,475 | |
Century Aluminum Co., 7.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 2,775,000 | | | | 2,580,750 | |
Cloud Peak Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 2017 | | | 3,880,000 | | | | 4,093,400 | |
Cloud Peak Energy, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 | | | 1,245,000 | | | | 1,344,600 | |
Commercial Metals Co., 4.875%, 2023 | | | 1,090,000 | | | | 1,013,700 | |
Consol Energy, Inc., 8%, 2017 | | | 2,510,000 | | | | 2,676,288 | |
Consol Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 2,250,000 | | | | 2,424,375 | |
First Quantum Minerals Ltd., 7.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,787,000 | | | | 3,692,325 | |
Fortescue Metals Group Ltd., 8.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 2,780,000 | | | | 2,932,900 | |
Peabody Energy Corp., 6%, 2018 | | | 2,110,000 | | | | 2,157,475 | |
Peabody Energy Corp., 6.25%, 2021 | | | 1,110,000 | | | | 1,087,800 | |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 6.125%, 2019 | | | 3,195,000 | | | | 3,422,353 | |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 8.625%, 2019 | | | 2,405,000 | | | | 2,663,538 | |
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 6.5%, 2020 | | | 800,000 | | | | 861,000 | |
Walter Energy Inc., 8.5%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,690,000 | | | | 1,373,125 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 37,142,148 | |
15
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Municipals - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1-A”, 4.5%, 2023 | | $ | 1,465,000 | | | $ | 1,362,230 | |
| | |
Natural Gas - Distribution - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
AmeriGas Finance LLC, 6.75%, 2020 | | $ | 4,040,000 | | | $ | 4,292,500 | |
Ferrellgas LP/Ferrellgas Finance Corp., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 1,695,000 | | | | 1,711,950 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,004,450 | |
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 3.3% | | | | | | | | |
Access Midstream Partners Co., 4.875%, 2023 | | $ | 2,240,000 | | | $ | 2,128,000 | |
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP, 4.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 860,000 | | | | 789,050 | |
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP, 5.875%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,610,000 | | | | 1,537,550 | |
Crosstex Energy, Inc., 8.875%, 2018 | | | 4,180,000 | | | | 4,451,700 | |
El Paso Corp., 7%, 2017 | | | 3,020,000 | | | | 3,364,839 | |
El Paso Corp., 7.75%, 2032 | | | 4,230,000 | | | | 4,494,337 | |
Energy Transfer Equity LP, 7.5%, 2020 | | | 3,405,000 | | | | 3,834,881 | |
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 8.375% to 2016, FRN to 2066 | | | 1,641,000 | | | | 1,829,715 | |
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 7.034% to 2018, FRN to 2068 | | | 760,000 | | | | 853,100 | |
Inergy Midstream LP, 6%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,240,000 | | | | 3,256,200 | |
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 5.5%, 2023 | | | 1,885,000 | | | | 1,903,850 | |
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 4.5%, 2023 | | | 2,429,000 | | | | 2,283,260 | |
Sabine Pass Liquefaction, 5.625%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,825,000 | | | | 1,799,906 | |
Sabine Pass Liquefaction, 5.625%, 2023 (n) | | | 2,470,000 | | | | 2,408,250 | |
Summit Midstream Holdings LLC, 7.5%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,255,000 | | | | 1,280,100 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 36,214,738 | |
Network & Telecom - 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Centurylink, Inc., 6.45%, 2021 | | $ | 1,000,000 | | | $ | 1,055,000 | |
Centurylink, Inc., 7.65%, 2042 | | | 2,830,000 | | | | 2,674,350 | |
Citizens Communications Co., 9%, 2031 | | | 1,970,000 | | | | 1,930,600 | |
Frontier Communications Corp., 8.125%, 2018 | | | 870,000 | | | | 970,050 | |
Qwest Corp., 7.5%, 2014 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,211 | |
TW Telecom Holdings, Inc., 5.375%, 2022 | | | 1,900,000 | | | | 1,909,500 | |
Windstream Corp., 8.125%, 2018 | | | 525,000 | | | | 559,125 | |
Windstream Corp., 7.75%, 2020 | | | 2,345,000 | | | | 2,497,425 | |
Windstream Corp., 7.75%, 2021 | | | 690,000 | | | | 734,850 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 12,334,111 | |
Oil Services - 1.5% | | | | | | | | |
Bristow Group, Inc., 6.25%, 2022 | | $ | 2,220,000 | | | $ | 2,308,800 | |
Chesapeake Oilfield Operating LLC, 6.625%, 2019 | | | 875,000 | | | | 883,750 | |
Dresser-Rand Group, Inc., 6.5%, 2021 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,065,000 | |
Edgen Murray Corp., 8.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,215,000 | | | | 3,215,000 | |
16
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Oil Services - continued | | | | | | | | |
Pacific Drilling S.A., 5.375%, 2020 (z) | | $ | 1,870,000 | | | $ | 1,832,600 | |
Shale-Inland Holdings LLC/Finance Co., 8.75%, 2019 (n) | | | 3,460,000 | | | | 3,589,750 | |
Unit Corp., 6.625%, 2021 | | | 3,595,000 | | | | 3,738,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 16,633,700 | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 5.5%, 2017 | | $ | 7,090,000 | | | $ | 7,495,725 | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 6.25%, 2017 | | | 2,010,000 | | | | 2,177,666 | |
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 2019, FRN to 2049 (n) | | | 2,973,000 | | | | 3,675,371 | |
LBG Capital No. 1 PLC, 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 4,720,000 | | | | 4,993,760 | |
Santander UK PLC, 8.963% to 2030, FRN to 2049 | | | 5,687,000 | | | | 7,108,750 | |
UBS AG, 7.625%, 2022 | | | 1,160,000 | | | | 1,290,523 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 26,741,795 | |
Pharmaceuticals - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Capsugel FinanceCo. SCA, 9.875%, 2019 (n) | | EUR | 2,270,000 | | | $ | 3,378,507 | |
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 7%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 2,805,000 | | | | 2,973,300 | |
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 7.25%, 2022 (n) | | | 2,700,000 | | | | 2,868,750 | |
Vantage Point Imaging, 7.5%, 2021 (z) | | | 1,560,000 | | | | 1,673,100 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,893,657 | |
Pollution Control - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Heckmann Corp., 9.875%, 2018 | | $ | 2,480,000 | | | $ | 2,548,200 | |
| | |
Precious Metals & Minerals - 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Eldorado Gold Corp., 6.125%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 2,195,000 | | | $ | 2,107,200 | |
IAMGOLD Corp., 6.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,467,000 | | | | 2,946,950 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 5,054,150 | |
Printing & Publishing - 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
American Media, Inc., 13.5%, 2018 (z) | | $ | 338,724 | | | $ | 342,111 | |
Gannett Co., Inc., 5.125%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,415,000 | | | | 1,411,463 | |
Lamar Media Corp., 5%, 2023 | | | 2,055,000 | | | | 1,967,663 | |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 7.75%, 2018 | | | 2,040,000 | | | | 2,218,500 | |
Nielsen Finance LLC, 4.5%, 2020 (n) | | | 3,405,000 | | | | 3,345,413 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 9,285,150 | |
Railroad & Shipping - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Kansas City Southern de Mexico S.A. de C.V., 6.125%, 2021 | | $ | 184,000 | | | $ | 207,000 | |
Watco Cos. LLC, 6.375%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,315,000 | | | | 1,311,713 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,518,713 | |
Real Estate - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc., REIT, 7.25%, 2019 | | $ | 1,525,000 | | | $ | 1,551,688 | |
DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc., REIT, 8.5%, 2017 | | | 2,145,000 | | | | 2,279,063 | |
17
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate - continued | | | | | | | | |
ERP Properties, REIT, 7.75%, 2020 | | $ | 1,805,000 | | | $ | 2,054,200 | |
ERP Properties, REIT, 5.75%, 2022 | | | 805,000 | | | | 819,273 | |
Felcor Lodging LP, REIT, 5.625%, 2023 | | | 405,000 | | | | 394,875 | |
Kennedy Wilson, Inc., 8.75%, 2019 | | | 975,000 | | | | 1,057,875 | |
MPT Operating Partnership LP, REIT, 6.875%, 2021 | | | 2,275,000 | | | | 2,428,563 | |
MPT Operating Partnership LP, REIT, 6.375%, 2022 | | | 2,540,000 | | | | 2,673,350 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 13,258,887 | |
Retailers - 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
Academy Ltd., 9.25%, 2019 (n) | | $ | 1,375,000 | | | $ | 1,540,000 | |
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp., 10%, 2019 | | | 2,770,000 | | | | 3,095,475 | |
CST Brands, Inc., 5%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,770,000 | | | | 1,747,875 | |
J. Crew Group, Inc., 8.125%, 2019 | | | 2,380,000 | | | | 2,522,800 | |
Jo-Ann Stores Holdings, Inc., 9.75%, 2019 (n)(p) | | | 1,345,000 | | | | 1,398,800 | |
Limited Brands, Inc., 6.9%, 2017 | | | 1,950,000 | | | | 2,203,500 | |
Limited Brands, Inc., 7%, 2020 | | | 1,295,000 | | | | 1,445,544 | |
Limited Brands, Inc., 6.95%, 2033 | | | 720,000 | | | | 720,000 | |
Rite Aid Corp., 9.25%, 2020 | | | 5,010,000 | | | | 5,579,888 | |
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 | | | 1,495,000 | | | | 1,637,025 | |
The Pantry, Inc., 8.375%, 2020 | | | 1,105,000 | | | | 1,193,400 | |
Toys “R” Us Property Co. II LLC, 8.5%, 2017 | | | 1,779,000 | | | | 1,879,069 | |
Toys “R” Us, Inc., 10.75%, 2017 | | | 2,535,000 | | | | 2,680,788 | |
YCC Holdings LLC/Yankee Finance, Inc., 10.25%, 2016 (p) | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 1,371,726 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 29,015,890 | |
Specialty Chemicals - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Chemtura Corp., 5.75%, 2021 | | $ | 740,000 | | | $ | 736,300 | |
Eagle Spinco, Inc., 4.625%, 2021 (n) | | | 525,000 | | | | 504,000 | |
Koppers, Inc., 7.875%, 2019 | | | 1,230,000 | | | | 1,313,025 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,553,325 | |
Specialty Stores - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Michaels Stores, Inc., 11.375%, 2016 | | $ | 360,000 | | | $ | 375,304 | |
Michaels Stores, Inc., 7.75%, 2018 | | | 1,820,000 | | | | 1,972,425 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,347,729 | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - 3.9% | | | | | | | | |
Clearwire Corp., 12%, 2015 (n) | | $ | 2,795,000 | | | $ | 2,962,700 | |
Cricket Communications, Inc., 7.75%, 2020 | | | 1,960,000 | | | | 2,229,500 | |
Crown Castle International Corp., 7.125%, 2019 | | | 2,840,000 | | | | 3,060,100 | |
Crown Castle International Corp., 5.25%, 2023 | | | 1,890,000 | | | | 1,819,125 | |
Digicel Group Ltd., 8.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 2,420,000 | | | | 2,522,850 | |
Digicel Group Ltd., 10.5%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,290,000 | | | | 2,484,650 | |
Eileme 2 AB, 11.625%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,220,000 | | | | 1,427,400 | |
18
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - continued | | | | | | | | |
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 7.875%, 2018 | | $ | 2,940,000 | | | $ | 3,189,900 | |
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 6.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,325,000 | | | | 1,351,500 | |
Sprint Capital Corp., 6.875%, 2028 | | | 2,890,000 | | | | 2,658,800 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 6%, 2016 | | | 3,395,000 | | | | 3,607,188 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 8.375%, 2017 | | | 2,549,000 | | | | 2,880,370 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 9%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,400,000 | | | | 1,659,000 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp., 6%, 2022 | | | 3,210,000 | | | | 3,089,625 | |
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 11.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 3,685,000 | | | | 3,887,675 | |
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 7.25%, 2018 (n) | | | 3,730,000 | | | | 3,841,900 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 42,672,283 | |
Telephone Services - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Cogent Communications Group, Inc., 8.375%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 965,000 | | | $ | 1,054,263 | |
Level 3 Financing, Inc., 9.375%, 2019 | | | 1,990,000 | | | | 2,208,900 | |
Level 3 Financing, Inc., 8.625%, 2020 | | | 1,320,000 | | | | 1,452,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,715,163 | |
Transportation - Services - 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
Aguila 3 S.A., 7.875%, 2018 (z) | | $ | 755,000 | | | $ | 781,425 | |
Aguila American Resources Ltd., 7.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,275,000 | | | | 2,354,625 | |
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC, 8.25%, 2019 | | | 1,655,000 | | | | 1,808,088 | |
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC, 9.75%, 2020 | | | 945,000 | | | | 1,102,106 | |
CEVA Group PLC, 8.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 5,350,000 | | | | 5,376,750 | |
Navios Maritime Acquisition Corp., 8.625%, 2017 | | | 3,680,000 | | | | 3,827,200 | |
Navios Maritime Holdings, Inc., 8.875%, 2017 | | | 1,069,000 | | | | 1,121,114 | |
Navios South American Logistics, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 | | | 1,998,000 | | | | 2,152,845 | |
Navios South American Logistics, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 (n) | | | 258,000 | | | | 277,995 | |
Swift Services Holdings, Inc., 10%, 2018 | | | 5,265,000 | | | | 5,883,638 | |
Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Ltd., 8.875%, 2021 (n) | | | 1,262,000 | | | | 1,287,240 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 25,973,026 | |
Utilities - Electric Power - 3.6% | | | | | | | | |
AES Corp., 8%, 2017 | | $ | 287,000 | | | $ | 332,920 | |
AES Corp., 7.375%, 2021 | | | 2,030,000 | | | | 2,293,900 | |
AES Corp., 4.875%, 2023 | | | 235,000 | | | | 223,250 | |
Calpine Corp., 7.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,840,000 | | | | 3,081,400 | |
Covanta Holding Corp., 7.25%, 2020 | | | 3,570,000 | | | | 3,859,645 | |
Covanta Holding Corp., 6.375%, 2022 | | | 725,000 | | | | 745,934 | |
EDP Finance B.V., 6%, 2018 (n) | | | 2,675,000 | | | | 2,773,387 | |
Energy Future Holdings Corp., 10%, 2020 | | | 10,607,000 | | | | 11,482,078 | |
Energy Future Holdings Corp., 10%, 2020 (n) | | | 2,580,000 | | | | 2,786,400 | |
Energy Future Holdings Corp., 12.25%, 2022 (n) | | | 2,555,000 | | | | 2,842,438 | |
InterGen N.V., 7%, 2023 (z) | | | 2,105,000 | | | | 2,099,738 | |
NRG Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 2020 | | | 5,025,000 | | | | 5,577,750 | |
19
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Utilities - Electric Power - continued | | | | | | | | |
NRG Energy, Inc., 6.625%, 2023 | | $ | 475,000 | | | $ | 486,875 | |
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC, 11.5%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,080,000 | | | | 810,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 39,395,715 | |
Utilities - Gas - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Suburban Propane Partners LP, 7.5%, 2018 | | $ | 505,000 | | | $ | 545,400 | |
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $1,001,946,647) | | | | | | $ | 1,027,221,796 | |
| | |
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
Aerospace - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
TransDigm, Inc., Term Loan C, 3.75%, 2020 | | $ | 1,461,586 | | | $ | 1,468,480 | |
| | |
Building - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
ABC Supply Co., Inc., Term Loan B, 3.5%, 2020 | | $ | 465,118 | | | $ | 465,201 | |
| | |
Conglomerates - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Silver II U.S. Holdings LLC, Term Loan B, 4%, 2019 | | $ | 977,929 | | | $ | 976,699 | |
| | |
Consumer Services - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Realogy Corp., Term Loan B, 4.5%, 2020 | | $ | 871,693 | | | $ | 878,776 | |
| | |
Energy - Independent - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
MEG Energy Corp., Term Loan B, 3.75%, 2020 | | $ | 1,436,991 | | | $ | 1,443,727 | |
| | |
Entertainment - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Cedar Fair LP, Term Loan B, 3.25%, 2020 | | $ | 1,089,617 | | | $ | 1,095,065 | |
| | |
Food & Beverages - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Aramark Corp., Term Loan D, 4%, 2019 | | $ | 1,469,080 | | | $ | 1,481,935 | |
H.J. Heinz Co., Term Loan B2, 3.5%, 2020 | | | 702,914 | | | | 709,065 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,191,000 | |
Retailers - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Rite Aid Corp., Term Loan, 4.87%, 2021 | | $ | 937,940 | | | $ | 943,802 | |
Toys ‘‘R’’ Us, Inc., Term Loan B, 2019 (o) | | | 1,940,340 | | | | 1,920,937 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,864,739 | |
Transportation - Services - 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
American Commercial Lines, Inc, Term Loan, 7.5%, 2019 | | $ | 5,306,274 | | | $ | 5,014,429 | |
| | |
Utilities - Electric Power - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Calpine Construction Finance Co., Term Loan B, 3%, 2020 | | $ | 2,646,162 | | | $ | 2,623,339 | |
Total Floating Rate Loans (Identified Cost, $19,168,565) | | | $ | 19,021,455 | |
20
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Automotive - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Accuride Corp. (a) | | | 48,891 | | | $ | 279,657 | |
| | |
Energy - Independent - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (a) | | | 490 | | | $ | 2,656 | |
Total Common Stocks (Identified Cost, $712,172) | | | | | | $ | 282,313 | |
| | |
Convertible Preferred Stocks - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Automotive - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
General Motors Co., 4.75% (Identified Cost, $1,623,484) | | | 34,840 | | | $ | 1,739,910 | |
| | |
Convertible Bonds - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Network & Telecom - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Nortel Networks Corp., 2.125%, 2014 (a)(d) (Identified Cost, $1,784,200) | | $ | 1,805,000 | | | $ | 1,773,413 | |
| | |
Preferred Stocks - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 7% (z) | | | 1,639 | | | $ | 1,623,532 | |
GMAC Capital Trust I, 8.125% | | | 83,650 | | | | 2,220,908 | |
Total Preferred Stocks (Identified Cost, $3,651,909) | | | | | | $ | 3,844,440 | |
| | |
Issuer/Expiration Date/Strike Price | | Number of Contracts | | | | |
Call Options Purchased - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
iShares Russell 2000 Index - September 2013 @ $106 (Premiums Paid, $340,597) | | | 2,545 | | | $ | 389,385 | |
| | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | | |
Money Market Funds - 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.08%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | | | 26,999,688 | | | $ | 26,999,688 | |
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $1,056,227,262) | | | | | | $ | 1,081,272,400 | |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 1.0% | | | | | | | 10,656,605 | |
Net Assets - 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 1,091,929,005 | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(d) | In default. Interest and/or scheduled principal payment(s) have been missed. |
(g) | The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on settled positions at period end, unless otherwise indicated. |
21
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $310,948,833, representing 28.5% of net assets. |
(o) | All or a portion of this position has not settled. Upon settlement date, interest rates for unsettled amounts will be determined. The rate shown, if any, represents the weighted average coupon rate for settled amounts. |
(p) | Payment-in-kind security. |
(r) | Remaining maturities of floating rate loans may be less than stated maturities shown as a result of contractual or optional prepayments by the borrower. Such prepayments cannot be predicted with certainty. These loans may be subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans generally have rates of interest which are determined periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Securities | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | | Value | |
Aguila 3 S.A., 7.875%, 2018 | | 7/30/13 | | | $775,763 | | | | $781,425 | |
Ally Financial, Inc., 7% (Preferred Stock) | | 4/13/11-11/27/12 | | | 1,552,313 | | | | 1,623,532 | |
American Media, Inc., 13.5%, 2018 | | 12/22/10-12/28/10 | | | 342,809 | | | | 342,111 | |
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 4.875%, 2022 | | 6/05/13-7/12/13 | | | 774,285 | | | | 768,275 | |
Audatex North America, Inc., 6%, 2021 | | 6/27/13 | | | 1,485,000 | | | | 1,510,988 | |
Boart Longyear Ltd., 7%, 2021 | | 6/04/13 | | | 586,204 | | | | 538,475 | |
Chester Downs & Marina LLC, 9.25%, 2020 | | 6/18/13-6/27/13 | | | 1,442,371 | | | | 1,435,500 | |
Dematic S.A., 7.75%, 2020 | | 12/13/12-7/29/13 | | | 5,188,031 | | | | 5,257,238 | |
Heckler & Koch GmbH, 9.5%, 2018 | | 5/06/11-1/02/13 | | | 2,364,351 | | | | 2,079,325 | |
Icahn Enterprises LP, 6%, 2020 | | 7/29/13 | | | 1,530,000 | | | | 1,530,000 | |
InterGen N.V., 7%, 2023 | | 6/07/13-7/24/13 | | | 2,090,751 | | | | 2,099,738 | |
LBI Media, Inc., 13.5% to 2015, 11.5% to 2020 | | 12/26/12-5/17/13 | | | 544,531 | | | | 418,634 | |
Local TV Finance LLC, 9.25%, 2015 | | 11/09/07-2/06/13 | | | 2,427,765 | | | | 2,471,614 | |
Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, 6.25%, 2021 | | 7/23/13 | | | 235,000 | | | | 236,175 | |
NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC, 5%, 2018 | | 7/30/13 | | | 1,307,250 | | | | 1,317,875 | |
NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5.25%, 2023 | | 7/16/13-7/31/13 | | | 1,413,188 | | | | 1,410,000 | |
Nara Cable Funding Ltd., 8.875%, 2018 | | 7/17/13 | | | 900,645 | | | | 882,000 | |
PNK Finance Corp., 6.375%, 2021 | | 7/30/13 | | | 940,000 | | | | 947,050 | |
Pacific Drilling S.A., 5.375%, 2020 | | 6/05/13-6/17/13 | | | 1,822,248 | | | | 1,832,600 | |
Peninsula Gaming LLC, 8.375%, 2018 | | 6/26/13 | | | 639,215 | | | | 665,738 | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC, 4.875%, 2021 | | 6/11/13 | | | 499,242 | | | | 473,438 | |
Quiksilver, Inc., 10%, 2020 | | 7/11/13 | | | 227,153 | | | | 237,475 | |
Renaissance Acquisition, 6.875%, 2021 | | 7/22/13 | | | 2,920,000 | | | | 2,905,400 | |
Summit Midstream Holdings LLC, 7.5%, 2021 | | 6/12/13 | | | 1,255,000 | | | | 1,280,100 | |
Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 2021 | | 7/19/13-7/24/13 | | | 1,205,736 | | | | 1,203,000 | |
22
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Securities - continued | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | | Value | |
Tronox Finance LLC, 6.375%, 2020 | | 7/15/13-7/31/13 | | | $1,392,001 | | | | $1,374,013 | |
Vantage Point Imaging, 7.5%, 2021 | | 6/27/13 | | | 1,560,000 | | | | 1,673,100 | |
Walter Energy Inc., 8.5%, 2021 | | 7/15/13-7/25/13 | | | 1,470,490 | | | | 1,373,125 | |
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | $38,667,944 | |
% of Net assets | | | | | | | | | 3.5% | |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
CLO | | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | | Public Limited Company |
REIT | | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Abbreviations indicate amounts shown in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. All amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. A list of abbreviations is shown below:
Derivative Contracts at 7/31/13
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 7/31/13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type | | Currency | | Counter- party | | Contracts to Deliver/ Receive | | | Settlement Date Range | | | In Exchange For | | | Contracts at Value | | | Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Liability Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SELL | | EUR | | Deutsche Bank AG | | | 4,296,534 | | | | 10/18/13 | | | | $5,509,919 | | | | $5,717,511 | | | | $(207,592 | ) |
SELL | | EUR | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | | 4,296,534 | | | | 10/18/13 | | | | 5,510,356 | | | | 5,717,511 | | | | (207,155 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $(414,747 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Swap Agreements at 7/31/13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expiration | | Currency | | | Notional Amount | | | Counterparty | | Cash Flows to Receive | | Cash Flows to Pay | | Fair Value | |
Asset Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swap Agreements | | | | | | | | |
12/20/17 | | | USD | | | | 15,000,000 | | | Deutsche Bank (a) | | 5.00% (fixed rate) | | (1) | | | $1,093,615 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Fund, as protection seller, to pay notional amount upon a defined credit event by a reference obligation specified in the CDX. NA.HY.19 Index, a B rated credit default index. The fund entered into the contract to manage market/sector exposure. |
(a) | Net unamortized premiums paid by the fund amounted to $899,640. |
The credit ratings presented here are an indicator of the current payment/performance risk of the related swap agreement, the reference obligation for which may be either a single security or, in the case of a credit default index, a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers. Ratings are assigned to each reference security, including each individual security within a
23
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
reference basket of securities, utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). The ratings for a credit default index are calculated by MFS as a weighted average of the external credit ratings of the individual securities that compose the index’s reference basket of securities.
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 7/31/13 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
| | | | |
Assets | | | | |
Investments- | | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $1,029,227,574) | | | $1,054,272,712 | |
Underlying affiliated funds, at cost and value | | | 26,999,688 | |
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $1,056,227,262) | | | $1,081,272,400 | |
Cash | | | 6,041 | |
Receivables for | | | | |
Investments sold | | | 1,996,676 | |
Fund shares sold | | | 1,201,267 | |
Interest and dividends | | | 20,373,916 | |
Swaps, at value (net unamortized premiums paid, $899,640) | | | 1,093,615 | |
Total assets | | | $1,105,943,915 | |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payables for | | | | |
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | $414,747 | |
Investments purchased | | | 12,353,423 | |
Fund shares reacquired | | | 1,190,331 | |
Payable to affiliates | | | | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 348 | |
Administrator | | | 96 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 55,965 | |
Total liabilities | | | $14,014,910 | |
Net assets | | | $1,091,929,005 | |
Net assets consist of | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | $1,067,535,101 | |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | | 24,826,398 | |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 1,090,140 | |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (1,522,634 | ) |
Net assets | | | $1,091,929,005 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | | | 111,150,345 | |
Net asset value per share (net assets of $1,091,929,005 / 111,150,345 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $9.82 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Period ended 7/31/13 (c) (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | | |
Income | | | | |
Interest | | | $23,639,890 | |
Dividends | | | 120,530 | |
Dividends from underlying affiliated funds | | | 13,335 | |
Total investment income | | | $23,773,755 | |
Expenses | | | | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | $350 | |
Administrative services fee | | | 6,186 | |
Custodian fee | | | 39,526 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 1,183 | |
Audit and tax fees | | | 16,040 | |
Legal fees | | | 6,009 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 9,355 | |
Total expenses | | | $78,649 | |
Fees paid indirectly | | | (156 | ) |
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser | | | (1,233 | ) |
Net expenses | | | $77,260 | |
Net investment income | | | $23,696,495 | |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | |
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | | | | |
Investments | | | $839,615 | |
Swap agreements | | | 65,265 | |
Foreign currency | | | 185,260 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | $1,090,140 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | |
Investments | | | $25,045,138 | |
Swap agreements | | | 193,975 | |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | | (412,715 | ) |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | $24,826,398 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | $25,916,538 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $49,613,033 | |
(c) | For the period from the commencement of the fund’s investment operations, March 25, 2013, through the stated period end. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
This statement describes the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
| | | | |
Change in net assets | | Period ended 7/31/13 (c) (unaudited) | |
From operations | | | | |
Net investment income | | | $23,696,495 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 1,090,140 | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | 24,826,398 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $49,613,033 | |
Distributions declared to shareholders | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(25,219,129 | ) |
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | | | $1,067,535,101 | |
Total change in net assets | | | $1,091,929,005 | |
Net assets | | | | |
At beginning of period | | | — | |
At end of period (including accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $1,522,634) | | | $1,091,929,005 | |
(c) | For the period from the commencement of the fund’s investment operations, March 25, 2013, through the stated period end. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Financial Statements
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
| | | | |
| | Period ended 7/31/13 (c) (unaudited) | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $10.00 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.23 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.17 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.06 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.24 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $9.82 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 0.64 | (n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 0.02 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 0.02 | (a) |
Net investment income | | | 6.50 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 13 | (n) |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $1,091,929 | |
(c) | For the period from the commencement of the fund’s investment operations, March 25, 2013, through the stated period end. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(x) | Total returns have been calculated on net asset values which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) Business and Organization
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust III (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company. This fund is available only to investment companies managed by MFS.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions. The fund invests in foreign securities. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment.
In this reporting period, the fund adopted the disclosure provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update 2011-11 (“ASU 2011-11”), Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities along with the related scope clarification provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Update 2013-01 (“ASU 2013-01”) entitled Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2011-11 is intended to enhance disclosures on the offsetting of financial assets and liabilities by requiring entities to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments and transactions that are either offset in the statement of financial position or subject to a Master Netting Agreement or similar arrangement. ASU 2013-01 limits the scope of ASU 2011-11’s disclosure requirements on offsetting to financial assets and financial liabilities related to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities lending and securities borrowing transactions. The disclosures required by ASU 2011-11, to the extent applicable to the fund, have been included in the fund’s Significant Accounting Policies note under the captions for each of the fund’s in-scope financial instruments and transactions.
In June 2013, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-08 Financial Services – Investment Companies (Topic 946) – Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2013-08”) which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. ASU 2013-08 sets forth a methodology for determining whether an entity should be characterized as an investment company and prescribes fair value accounting for an investment company’s
29
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
non-controlling ownership interest in another investment company. FASB has determined that a fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 automatically meets ASU 2013-08’s criteria for an investment company. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2013-08 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Equity securities, including restricted equity securities, are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which they are primarily traded. Equity securities, for which there were no sales reported that day, are generally valued at the last quoted daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which such securities are primarily traded.
Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Exchange-traded options are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the exchange on which such options are primarily traded. Exchange-traded options for which there were no sales reported that day are generally valued at the last daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the exchange on which such options are primarily traded. Options not traded on an exchange are generally valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Foreign currency options are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of bid and asked prices for the time period interpolated from rates provided by a third-party pricing service for proximate time periods. Swap agreements are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service, which for cleared swaps includes an evaluation of any trading activity at the clearinghouses. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if
30
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as forward foreign currency exchange contracts and swap agreements. The following is a summary of the levels used as of July 31, 2013 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments at Value | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Equity Securities | | | $4,632,516 | | | | $1,623,532 | | | | $— | | | | $6,256,048 | |
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | | | — | | | | 2,656,982 | | | | — | | | | 2,656,982 | |
Municipal Bonds | | | — | | | | 1,362,230 | | | | — | | | | 1,362,230 | |
U.S. Corporate Bonds | | | — | | | | 841,943,358 | | | | — | | | | 841,943,358 | |
Foreign Bonds | | | — | | | | 183,032,639 | | | | — | | | | 183,032,639 | |
Floating Rate Loans | | | — | | | | 19,021,455 | | | | — | | | | 19,021,455 | |
Mutual Funds | | | 26,999,688 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 26,999,688 | |
Total Investments | | | $31,632,204 | | | | $1,049,640,196 | | | | $— | | | | $1,081,272,400 | |
| | | | |
Other Financial Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Swap Agreements | | | $— | | | | $1,093,615 | | | | $— | | | | $1,093,615 | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | | — | | | | (414,747 | ) | | | — | | | | (414,747 | ) |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
31
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate or currency exposure, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
The derivative instruments used by the fund were purchased options, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at July 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value (a) | |
Risk | | Derivative Contracts | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | |
Foreign Exchange | | Forward Foreign Currency Exchange | | | $— | | | | $(414,747 | ) |
Equity | | Purchased Equity Options | | | 389,385 | | | | — | �� |
Credit | | Credit Default Swaps | | | 1,093,615 | | | | — | |
Total | | | | | $1,483,000 | | | | $(414,747 | ) |
(a) | The value of purchased options outstanding is included in total investments, at value, within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Risk | | Swap Agreements | | | Foreign Currency | | | Investments (Purchased Options) | |
Foreign Exchange | | | $— | | | | $188,400 | | | | $— | |
Equity | | | — | | | | — | | | | 576,160 | |
Credit | | | 65,265 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total | | | $65,265 | | | | $188,400 | | | | $576,160 | |
32
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended July 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Risk | | Swap Agreements | | | Translation of Assets and Liabilities in Foreign Currencies | | | Investments (Purchased Options) | |
Foreign Exchange | | | $— | | | | $(412,715 | ) | | | $— | |
Equity | | | — | | | | — | | | | 48,788 | |
Credit | | | 193,975 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total | | | $193,975 | | | | $(412,715 | ) | | | $48,788 | |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain, but not all, over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. Upon an event of default or a termination of the ISDA Master Agreement, the non-defaulting party has the right to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any.
Collateral and margin requirements differ by type of derivative. Margin requirements are set by the broker or clearing house for cleared derivatives (i.e., futures contracts, cleared swaps, and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, uncleared swap agreements, and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash that has been segregated to cover the fund’s collateral or margin obligations under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported separately in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities pledged as collateral or margin for the same purpose, if any, is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
The fund’s accounting policy with respect to balance sheet offsetting is that, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Purchased Options – The fund purchased call options for a premium. Purchased call options entitle the holder to buy a specified number of shares or units of a particular
33
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
security, currency or index at a specified price at a specified date or within a specified period of time. Purchasing call options may hedge against an anticipated increase in the dollar cost of securities or currency to be acquired or increase the fund’s exposure to an underlying instrument.
The premium paid is initially recorded as an investment in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. That investment is subsequently marked-to-market daily with the difference between the premium paid and the market value of the purchased option being recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. Premiums paid for purchased call options which have expired are treated as realized losses on investments in the Statement of Operations. Upon the exercise or closing of a purchased call option, the premium paid is added to the cost of the security or financial instrument purchased.
Whether or not the option is exercised, the fund’s maximum risk of loss from purchasing an option is the amount of premium paid. All option contracts involve credit risk if the counterparty to the option contract fails to perform. For over-the-counter options, this risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts – The fund entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. These contracts may be used to hedge the fund’s currency risk or for non-hedging purposes. For hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts to deliver or receive foreign currency that the fund will receive from or use in its normal investment activities. The fund may also use contracts to hedge against declines in the value of foreign currency denominated securities due to unfavorable exchange rate movements. For non-hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts with the intent of changing the relative exposure of the fund’s portfolio of securities to different currencies to take advantage of anticipated exchange rate changes.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a receivable or payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts until the contract settlement date. On contract settlement date, any gain or loss on the contract is recorded as realized gains or losses on foreign currency.
Risks may arise upon entering into these contracts from unanticipated movements in the value of the contract and from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Generally, the fund’s maximum risk due to counterparty credit risk is the unrealized gain on the contract due to the use of Continuous Linked Settlement, an industry accepted settlement system. This risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Swap Agreements – During the period the fund entered into swap agreements. Effective June 10, 2013, certain types of swaps (“cleared swaps”) are required to be
34
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
centrally cleared under provisions of the Dodd-Frank Regulatory Reform Bill. In a cleared swap transaction, the swap agreement is novated to a central counterparty (the “clearinghouse”) immediately following execution of the swap contract with an executing broker. Thereafter, throughout the term of the cleared swap, the fund interfaces indirectly with the clearinghouse through a clearing broker.
A swap agreement is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap agreement, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations. The daily change in valuation of centrally cleared swaps is recorded as a receivable or payable for variation margin in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap agreement are reflected as premiums paid or received in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap agreements are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. For uncleared swaps, that risk is further reduced by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement. Although not covered by an ISDA Master Agreement, the fund’s counterparty risk due to cleared swaps is mitigated by the clearinghouses’ margining requirements and financial safeguards in the event of a clearing broker default.
The fund entered into credit default swap agreements in order to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap agreement, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the agreement notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although agreement-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant agreement. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American
35
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference between the value of the deliverable obligation and the swap agreement’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations.
Credit default swap agreements are considered to have credit-risk-related contingent features since they trigger payment by the protection seller to the protection buyer upon the occurrence of a defined credit event. The maximum amount of future, undiscounted payments that the fund, as protection seller, could be required to make is equal to the swap agreement’s notional amount. The protection seller’s payment obligation would be offset to the extent of the value of the agreement’s deliverable obligation. At July 31, 2013, the fund did not hold any credit default swap agreements at an unrealized loss where it is the protection seller.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the agreement. For uncleared swaps, counterparty risk is reduced by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement. For cleared swaps, the fund’s counterparty risk is mitigated by the clearinghouses’ margining requirements and financial safeguards in the event of a clearing broker default.
Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments – The fund invests in loans and loan participations or other receivables. These investments may include standby financing commitments, including revolving credit facilities, which obligate the fund to supply additional cash to the borrower on demand. Loan participations involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other financial intermediary.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fund earns certain fees in connection with its floating rate loan purchasing activities. These fees are in addition to interest payments earned and may include amendment fees, commitment fees, facility fees, consent fees, and prepayment fees. Commitment fees are recorded on an accrual basis as income in the accompanying financial statements. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained
36
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended July 31, 2013, is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end.
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
| | | | |
As of 7/31/13 | | | |
Cost of investments | | | $1,060,881,472 | |
Gross appreciation | | | 34,260,153 | |
Gross depreciation | | | (13,869,225 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | $20,390,928 | |
37
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(3) Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. MFS receives no compensation under this agreement; however MFS receives management fees from the MFS funds that invest in the fund.
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, provides transfer agent and recordkeeping functions in connection with the issuance, transfer, and redemption of shares of the fund under a Shareholder Servicing Agent Agreement. MFSC is not paid a fee for providing these services. MFSC may receive payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, out-of-pocket expenses amounted to $350. The fund may also pay shareholder servicing related costs to non-related parties.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended July 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0017% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), and MFSC. The independent Trustees currently are not receiving any payments for their services to the fund.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $3,083 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $1,233, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity.
38
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” in the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
On March 22, 2013, MFS purchased 3 shares of the fund for an aggregate amount of $30.
(4) Portfolio Securities
Purchases and sales of investments, other than purchased option transactions and short-term obligations, aggregated $203,432,059 and $111,053,728, respectively.
(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Period ended 7/31/13 (c) | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares sold | | | 117,501,122 | | | | $1,130,814,029 | |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | | | 2,545,565 | | | | $25,218,005 | |
Shares reacquired | | | (8,896,342 | ) | | | $(88,496,933 | ) |
Net change | | | 111,150,345 | | | | $1,067,535,101 | |
(c) | For the period from the commencement of the fund’s investment operations, March 25, 2013, through the stated period end. |
The fund is an MFS Pooled Portfolio, which is designed to be used by certain MFS funds to invest in a particular security type rather than invest in the security type directly. The fund is solely invested in by other MFS funds for the purpose of gaining exposure to high income debt instruments, rather than investing in high income debt instruments directly. The MFS funds do not invest in this fund for the purpose of exercising management or control. At the end of the period, the MFS Diversified Income Fund, MFS High Yield Opportunities Fund, MFS Strategic Income Fund, MFS Strategic Income Portfolio, and MFS Strategic Income Series were the owners of record of approximately 44%, 44%, 10%, 1%, and 1%, respectively, of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund.
(6) Line of Credit
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended July 31, 2013, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $2,219 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations.
39
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be an affiliated issuer:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Fund | | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | | | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | | | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | | | Ending Shares/Par Amount | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | — | | | | 183,684,284 | | | | (156,684,596 | ) | | | 26,999,688 | |
| | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Fund | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | | Capital Gain Distributions | | | Dividend Income | | | Ending Value | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | $— | | | | $— | | | | $13,335 | | | | $26,999,688 | |
40
BOARD APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, initially approve the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS (the “Agreement”) and, beginning on the second anniversary of the initial effective date of the Agreement, annually approve the continuation of the Agreement. In June 2012 and July 2012, the Board met to consider the initial approval of the Agreement (“the initial review meetings”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the initial approval of the Agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services to be performed by MFS under the Agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their initial review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the Fund’s proposed fees and expenses and the fees and expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), and (ii) information provided by MFS on the fees charged by certain other registered funds that MFS believes serve a similar purpose to the Fund, but are not included in the Lipper expense group. In addition, in connection with the independent Trustees’ meetings in May, June and July, 2012 (the “contract review meetings”) for the purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”), the independent Trustees received: (i) information provided by MFS on fees it charges to institutional accounts managed in styles similar to other MFS Funds, (ii) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business (iii) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (iv) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (v) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel that would provide investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the initial approval of the Agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’
41
Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. Because the Fund is newly organized and had not yet commenced investment operations at the time of the initial review meetings, the Fund had no investment performance for the Trustees to review.
The Trustees considered that MFS will not charge any advisory fees for providing investment advisory services to the Fund, but that MFS would continue to receive advisory fees from participating funds that invest a portion of their assets in the Fund.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s expenses, the Trustees considered, among other information, the estimated total expense ratio of the Fund’s shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc., noting that the Fund’s total expense ratio was expected to be relatively low because, as noted above, the Fund does not bear advisory expenses. The Trustees considered that, according to the Lipper data, the Fund’s total expense ratio would be approximately at the Lipper expense group median. Because the Fund will not pay advisory fees, the Trustees did not consider the extent to which economies of scale would be realized due to the Fund’s growth of assets, whether fee levels reflect economies of scale for the Fund’s shareholders, or the fees paid by similar clients of MFS.
The Trustees did not consider MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund because the Fund had not yet commenced operations. The Trustees considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and institutional accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services to be provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the Agreement. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS may perform or arrange for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services to be provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.
42
Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s Agreement with MFS should be approved for an initial two-year period, commencing upon its effective date, as set forth in the Agreement.
43
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2013 will be available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
FURTHER INFORMATION
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.
PROVISION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS AND SUMMARY PROSPECTUSES
The fund produces financial reports every six months and updates its summary prospectus and prospectus annually. To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, only one copy of the fund’s annual and semiannual report and summary prospectus may be mailed to shareholders having the same last name and residential address on the fund’s records. However, any shareholder may contact MFSC (please see back cover for address and telephone number) to request that copies of these reports and summary prospectuses be sent personally to that shareholder.
44
Save paper with eDelivery.
| MFS® will send you prospectuses, |
reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter.
To sign up:
1. Go to mfs.com.
2. Log in via MFS® Access.
3. Select eDelivery.
If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS® Access, or eDelivery may not be available to you.
CONTACT
WEB SITE
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
ACCOUNT SERVICE AND LITERATURE
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Financial advisors
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
MAILING ADDRESS
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
OVERNIGHT MAIL
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
During the period covered by this report, the Registrant has not amended any provision in its Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that relates to an element of the Code’s definitions enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 2 of this Form N-CSR. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant did not grant a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from any provision of the Code.
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
A schedule of investments for each series of the Registrant is included as part of the report to shareholders of such series under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may send recommendations to the Board for nominees to the Registrant’s Board since the Registrant last provided disclosure as to such procedures in response to the requirements of Item 407 (c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K or this Item.
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
(a) | Based upon their evaluation of the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR, the registrant’s principal financial officer and principal executive officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by the report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
(a) | File the exhibits listed below as part of this form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated. |
| (1) | Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit. |
| (2) | A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2): Attached hereto. |
(b) | If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)), Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: Attached hereto. |
Notice
A copy of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, as amended, of the Registrant is on file with the Secretary of State of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and notice is hereby given that this instrument is executed on behalf of the Registrant by an officer of the Registrant as an officer and not individually and the obligations of or arising out of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees or shareholders individually, but are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective constituent series of the Registrant.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) MFS SERIES TRUST III
| | |
By (Signature and Title)* | | JOHN M. CORCORAN |
| | John M. Corcoran, President |
Date: September 16, 2013
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
By (Signature and Title)* | | JOHN M. CORCORAN |
| | John M. Corcoran, President (Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: September 16, 2013
| | |
By (Signature and Title)* | | DAVID L. DILORENZO |
| | David L. DiLorenzo, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) |
Date: September 16, 2013
* | Print name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature. |