Following is a summary of selected financial information for the Company’s business segments as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, and September 30, 2006:
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition of First Busey Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) at September 30, 2007 (unaudited), as compared with December 31, 2006, and the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited). Management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report, as well as the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
SUMMARY
Main Street Trust, Inc. Merger
The Company completed its merger of equals with Main Street Trust, Inc. following the close of business on July 31, 2007. As a result of the merger, two full months of earnings contribution from Main Street Bank & Trust and FirsTech, our payment processing company, are included in the September 30, 2007 results. The next significant step in the process is the bank merger of Main Street Bank & Trust with and into Busey Bank, which is expected to occur in November 2007. Our bank merger will include the launch of an updated Busey brand.
As required by the United States Department of Justice, prior to the closing of our merger, we reached an agreement to sell five Main Street Bank & Trust banking centers. The divestiture of the five branches, which represents approximately 1% of consolidated loans and 3% of consolidated deposits, closed in November 2007. The divestiture is not expected to have a significant impact upon earnings.
Operating Results
Net income was $11.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $7.6 million for the comparable period in 2006. For the quarter ended September 30, 2007, earnings per share on a fully-diluted basis were $0.36, equaling the $0.36 for the comparable period in 2006. On a year-to-date basis, net income was $27.1 million as compared to $21.5 million for the comparable period in 2006. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, earnings per share on a fully-diluted basis were $1.09, an increase of $0.09 or 9.0% from $1.00 for the comparable period in 2006. Two months of Main Street Bank & Trust and FirsTech net earnings are reflected in the results for the periods ended September 30, 2007.
Busey Bank’s net income was $23.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $21.8 for the comparable period in 2006, an increase of 9.2%. Main Street Bank & Trust contributed $3.4 million in net income for the two months following the merger. Busey Bank N.A.’s net income was $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $2.9 million for the comparable period in 2006. The decrease in net income at Busey Bank N.A. is primarily related to the significant decline in the southwest Florida residential real estate market. The decrease is due to the end of a high-margin, short-term construction lending program, decline in residential construction originations and loan loss charges related to the market decline. Busey Bank N.A.’s income was supplemented by two months of FirsTech income of $0.3 million. Following the merger, FirsTech became a subsidiary of Busey Bank N.A. Due to the unique nature of FirsTech’s operations, management identified FirsTech as a segment separate from Busey Bank N.A.
The Company experienced deterioration in its loan portfolio during the third quarter. Total non-performing assets were $26.0 million at September 30, 2007, compared to $12.2 million at June 30, 2007 and $7.1 million at September 30, 2006. The $26.0 million reflected $6.6 million of non-performing assets on the books of Main Street Bank & Trust. The remainder of the increase was primarily attributable to southwest Florida real estate loans.
The provision for loan losses was $1.8 million during the third quarter of 2007 compared to $300,000 in the comparable period of 2006. The provision was $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, versus $1.0 million in the comparable period of 2006. As a percentage of total outstanding loans, the allowance for loan losses was 1.26% as of September 30, 2007, and 1.24% as of September 30, 2006. Total allowance for loan losses was $38.2 million at September 30, 2007, representing 159.7% coverage of non-performing loans.
At September 30, 2007, the Company had 2,049,439 stock options outstanding, of which 2,029,439 were exercisable.
20 of 39
EARNINGS PERFORMANCE
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is the difference of interest income and fees earned on earning assets less interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate levels and volume fluctuations within earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities impact net interest income. Net interest margin is tax-equivalent net interest income as a percent of average earning assets.
Certain assets with tax favorable treatment are evaluated on a tax-equivalent basis. Tax-equivalent basis assumes a federal income tax rate of 35%. Tax favorable assets generally have lower contractual pre-tax yields than fully taxable assets. A tax-equivalent analysis is performed by adding the tax savings to the earnings on tax favorable assets. After factoring in the tax favorable effects of these assets, the yields may be more appropriately evaluated against alternative earning assets. In addition to yield, various other risks are factored into the evaluation process.
Table 1 summarizes the changes in the Company’s average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as well as the average rates earned and paid on these assets and liabilities, respectively, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. This table also details increases and decreases in income and expense for each of the major categories of assets and liabilities and analyzes the extent to which such variances are attributable to volume and rate changes.
Table 2 summarizes the same information as Table 1 but for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
21 of 39
TABLE 1 - AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST RATES
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 AND 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | Change due to (1) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average Balance | | Income/ Expense | | Yield/ Rate | | Average Yield/Rate | | Average Yield/Rate | | Yield/ Rate | | Average Volume | | Average Yield/Rate | | Total Change | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets | | | |
Interest-bearing bank deposits | | $ | 366 | | $ | 4 | | | 4.34 | % | $ | 379 | | | $ | 5 | | | 5.23 | % | $ | — | | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (1 | ) |
Federal funds sold | | | 57,585 | | | 703 | | | 4.84 | % | | 5,017 | | | | 66 | | | 5.22 | % | | 1,213 | | | | (576 | ) | | 637 | |
Investment securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government obligations | | | 400,148 | | | 5,579 | | | 5.53 | % | | 190,867 | | | | 1,951 | | | 4.06 | % | | 2,993 | | | | 635 | | | 3,628 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions (1) | | | 84,527 | | | 1,281 | | | 6.01 | % | | 84,807 | | | | 1,277 | | | 5.97 | % | | (4 | ) | | | 8 | | | 4 | |
Other securities | | | 72,167 | | | 493 | | | 2.71 | % | | 43,051 | | | | 410 | | | 3.78 | % | | 330 | | | | (247 | ) | | 83 | |
Loans (net of unearned interest)(1) (2) | | | 2,689,472 | | | 51,286 | | | 7.57 | % | | 1,855,980 | | | | 34,639 | | | 7.40 | % | | 15,708 | | | | 939 | | | 16,647 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
Total interest earning assets | | $ | 3,304,265 | | $ | 59,346 | | | 7.13 | % | $ | 2,180,101 | | | $ | 38,348 | | | 6.98 | % | $ | 20,240 | | | $ | 758 | | $ | 20,998 | |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | | 65,605 | | | | | | | | | 54,254 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Premises and equipment | | | 58,564 | | | | | | | | | 41,174 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (32,841 | ) | | | | | | | | (23,461 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 243,568 | | | | | | | | | 105,066 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Assets | | $ | 3,639,161 | | | | | | | | $ | 2,357,134 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Interest-bearing transaction deposits | | $ | 143,045 | | $ | 603 | | | 1.67 | % | $ | 66,782 | | | $ | 399 | | | 2.37 | % | $ | 349 | | | $ | (145 | ) | $ | 204 | |
Savings deposits | | | 136,847 | | | 299 | | | 0.87 | % | | 106,977 | | | | 254 | | | 0.94 | % | | 67 | | | | (22 | ) | | 45 | |
Money market deposits | | | 1,021,184 | | | 8,541 | | | 3.32 | % | | 671,870 | | | | 5,174 | | | 3.06 | % | | 2,889 | | | | 478 | | | 3,367 | |
Time deposits | | | 1,241,820 | | | 15,078 | | | 4.82 | % | | 786,949 | | | | 8,726 | | | 4.40 | % | | 5,455 | | | | 897 | | | 6,352 | |
Short-term borrowings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds purchased | | | 3,878 | | | 42 | | | 4.30 | % | | 25,536 | | | | 357 | | | 5.55 | % | | (249 | ) | | | (66 | ) | | (315 | ) |
Repurchase agreements | | | 122,551 | | | 1,308 | | | 4.23 | % | | 47,538 | | | | 467 | | | 3.90 | % | | 797 | | | | 44 | | | 841 | |
Other | | | 11,182 | | | 158 | | | 5.61 | % | | 2,674 | | | | 36 | | | 5.34 | % | | 120 | | | | 2 | | | 122 | |
Long-term debt | | | 138,260 | | | 1,748 | | | 5.02 | % | | 160,206 | | | | 1,993 | | | 4.94 | % | | (277 | ) | | | 32 | | | (245 | ) |
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts | | | 55,000 | | | 1,013 | | | 7.31 | % | | 55,000 | | | | 1,010 | | | 7.29 | % | | — | | | | 3 | | | 3 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | $ | 2,873,767 | | $ | 28,790 | | | 3.97 | % | $ | 1,923,532 | | | $ | 18,416 | | | 3.80 | % | $ | 9,151 | | | $ | 1,223 | | $ | 10,374 | |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest spread | | | | | | | | | 3.16 | % | | | | | | | | | 3.18 | % | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Demand deposits | | | 366,280 | | | | | | | | | 241,943 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 28,212 | | | | | | | | | 15,864 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 370,902 | | | | | | | | | 175,795 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 3,639,161 | | | | | | | | $ | 2,357,134 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Interest income / earning assets (1) | | $ | 3,304,265 | | $ | 59,346 | | | 7.13 | % | $ | 2,180,101 | | | $ | 38,348 | | | 6.98 | % | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense / earning assets | | $ | 3,304,265 | | $ | 28,790 | | | 3.46 | % | $ | 2,180,101 | | | $ | 18,416 | | | 3.35 | % | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest margin (1) | | | | | $ | 30,556 | | | 3.67 | % | | | | | $ | 19,932 | | | 3.63 | % | $ | 11,089 | | | $ | (465 | ) | $ | 10,624 | |
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
(1) | On a tax-equivalent basis assuming a federal income tax rate of 35% for 2007 and 2006 |
(2) | Non-accrual loans have been included in average loans, net of unearned interest. |
22 of 39
TABLE 2 - AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST RATES
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 AND 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | Change due to (1) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average Balance | | Income/ Expense | | Yield/ Rate | | Average Balance | | Income/ Expense | | Yield/ Rate | | Average Volume | | Average Yield/Rate | | Total Change | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets | | | |
Interest-bearing bank deposits | | $ | 242 | | $ | 9 | | | 4.97 | % | $ | 505 | | $ | 18 | | | 4.77 | % | $ | (10 | ) | | $ | 1 | | $ | (9 | ) |
Federal funds sold | | | 24,637 | | | 990 | | | 5.37 | % | | 5,178 | | | 188 | | | 4.85 | % | | 990 | | | | (188 | ) | | 802 | |
Investment securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government obligations | | | 272,940 | | | 10,706 | | | 5.24 | % | | 196,015 | | | 5,740 | | | 3.92 | % | | 2,554 | | | | 2,412 | | | 4,966 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions (1) | | | 78,534 | | | 3,539 | | | 6.02 | % | | 84,265 | | | 3,782 | | | 6.00 | % | | (257 | ) | | | 14 | | | (243 | ) |
Other securities | | | 55,948 | | | 1,475 | | | 3.52 | % | | 44,832 | | | 1,261 | | | 3.76 | % | | 318 | | | | (104 | ) | | 214 | |
Loans (net of unearned interest) (1) (2) | | | 2,199,011 | | | 123,205 | | | 7.49 | % | | 1,799,137 | | | 97,254 | | | 7.23 | % | | 21,791 | | | | 4,160 | | | 25,951 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
Total interest earning assets | | $ | 2,631,312 | | $ | 139,924 | | | 7.11 | % | $ | 2,129,932 | | $ | 108,243 | | | 6.79 | % | $ | 25,386 | | | $ | 6,295 | | $ | 31,681 | |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | | 56,618 | | | | | | | | | 53,164 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Premises and equipment | | | 46,927 | | | | | | | | | 40,148 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (26,775 | ) | | | | | | | | (23,425 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 161,667 | | | | | | | | | 103,775 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Assets | | $ | 2,869,749 | | | | | | | | $ | 2,303,594 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing transaction deposits | | $ | 64,122 | | $ | 781 | | | 1.63 | % | $ | 71,552 | | $ | 1,188 | | | 2.22 | % | $ | (114 | ) | | $ | (293 | ) | $ | (407 | ) |
Savings deposits | | | 112,602 | | | 782 | | | 0.93 | % | | 112,218 | | | 766 | | | 0.91 | % | | 3 | | | | 13 | | | 16 | |
Money market deposits | | | 842,004 | | | 20,288 | | | 3.22 | % | | 642,027 | | | 13,241 | | | 2.76 | % | | 4,575 | | | | 2,472 | | | 7,047 | |
Time deposits | | | 1,004,150 | | | 36,177 | | | 4.82 | % | | 760,264 | | | 23,402 | | | 4.12 | % | | 8,343 | | | | 4,432 | | | 12,775 | |
Short-term borrowings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds purchased | | | 7,526 | | | 375 | | | 6.66 | % | | 20,721 | | | 823 | | | 5.31 | % | | (619 | ) | | | 171 | | | (448 | ) |
Repurchase agreements | | | 76,904 | | | 2,420 | | | 4.21 | % | | 48,683 | | | 1,285 | | | 3.53 | % | | 852 | | | | 283 | | | 1,135 | |
Other | | | 5,459 | | | 223 | | | 5.46 | % | | 1,463 | | | 57 | | | 5.21 | % | | 163 | | | | 3 | | | 166 | |
Long-term debt | | | 145,038 | | | 5,420 | | | 5.00 | % | | 160,886 | | | 5,707 | | | 4.74 | % | | (582 | ) | | | 295 | | | (287 | ) |
| |
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts | | | 55,000 | | | 3,015 | | | 7.33 | % | | 52,000 | | | 3,049 | | | 7.84 | % | | 171 | | | | (205 | ) | | (34 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | $ | 2,312,805 | | $ | 69,481 | | | 4.02 | % | $ | 1,869,814 | | $ | 49,518 | | | 3.54 | % | $ | 12,792 | | | $ | 7,171 | | $ | 19,963 | |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest spread | | | | | | | | | 3.09 | % | | | | | | | | 3.25 | % | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Demand deposits | | | 276.874 | | | | | | | | | 245,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 21,724 | | | | | | | | | 16,091 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 258,346 | | | | | | | | | 172,689 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 2,869,749 | | | | | | | | $ | 2,303,594 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income / earning assets (1) | | $ | 2,631,312 | | $ | 139,924 | | | 7.11 | % | $ | 2,129,932 | | $ | 108,243 | | | 6.79 | % | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense / earning assets | | $ | 2,631,312 | | $ | 69,481 | | | 3.53 | % | $ | 2,129,932 | | $ | 49,518 | | | 3.10 | % | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest margin (1) | | | | | $ | 70,443 | | | 3.58 | % | | | | $ | 58,725 | | | 3.69 | % | $ | 12,593 | | | $ | (876 | ) | $ | 11,717 | |
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
(1) | On a tax-equivalent basis assuming a federal income tax rate of 35% for 2007 and 2006 |
(2) | Non-accrual loans have been included in average loans, net of unearned interest. |
23 of 39
The increased average earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 over the same periods of 2006 related primarily to the merger with Main Street. The merger added an additional $350.2 million of investments, $1.02 billion of loans and $1.25 billion of deposits. The resulting averages from the merger contribution led to significant increases across all line items. The impact is more evident in the three month period ended due to the shortened average time frame.
During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007, the changes in volume had a positive impact on the Company’s net interest margin. The positive volume change indicated that earning assets grew at a rate faster than interest-bearing liabilities. However, changes in rates moderately offset the positive volume changes, as rates on interest-bearing liabilities grew faster than rates on earning assets. The changes in rates were consistent with our consolidated short-term liability sensitive position.
Overall, net interest margin has been declining in recent annual periods as evidenced in the decline for the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006. However, net interest margins seem to have stabilized over the last twelve months as evidenced by the slight increase for the three month period ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the equivalent period in 2006.
Management attempts to mitigate the effects of an unpredictable interest-rate environment through effective portfolio management, prudent loan underwriting and operational efficiencies. Management expects the current credit environment will present challenges to net interest margin management due to recent growth in delinquent and non-accrual loans. Please refer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement in the Company’s 2006 10-K for accounting policies underlying the recognition of interest income and expense.
OTHER INCOME
TABLE 3 - OTHER INCOME
THREE and NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 AND 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | % Change | | 2007 | | 2006 | | % Change | |
| |
| |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| |
| |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | $ | 2,533 | | $ | 2,122 | | 19.4 | % | | $ | 6,447 | | $ | 6,011 | | 7.3 | % | |
Trust | | | 2,691 | | | 1,312 | | 105.1 | % | | | 6,090 | | | 4,470 | | 36.2 | % | |
Other service charges & fees | | | 900 | | | 738 | | 22.0 | % | | | 2,575 | | | 2,187 | | 17.7 | % | |
Security gains, net | | | 2,065 | | | 794 | | 160.1 | % | | | 2,995 | | | 1,880 | | 59.3 | % | |
Gain on sales of loans | | | 994 | | | 786 | | 26.5 | % | | | 2,414 | | | 1,858 | | 29.9 | % | |
Commissions and brokers’ fees, net | | | 707 | | | 608 | | 16.3 | % | | | 1,949 | | | 1,987 | | (1.9 | )% | |
Remittance payment processing | | | 1,746 | | | — | | 100.0 | % | | | 1,746 | | | — | | 100.0 | % | |
Other operating income | | | 1,376 | | | 841 | | 63.6 | % | | | 3,125 | | | 1,885 | | 65.8 | % | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total other income | | $ | 13,012 | | $ | 7,201 | | 80.7 | % | | $ | 27,341 | | $ | 20,278 | | 34.8 | % | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Other income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 increased significantly due to the merger with Main Street. Trust revenues increased $1.4 million and $1.6 million for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to the $1.3 million of trust revenues contributed by Main Street Bank & Trust’s trust department in the two months since completing the merger.
Remittance payment processing revenue relates to our payment processing company, FirsTech, which was part of the Main Street merger. FirsTech has historically shown good growth and the Company believes that it continues to show good growth potential. The $1.7 million of remittance payment revenues represented two months of activity for FirsTech following the merger.
24 of 39
Commissions and brokers fees, net, showed moderate growth for the three month period, but a moderate decline for the nine month period, both ended September 30, 2007. Commissions and brokers’ fees growth in Busey Investment Group and the addition of Main Street’s two month contribution was offset by a large decline in Busey Bank N.A.’s commissions and brokers’ fees. Busey Bank N.A.’s brokerage subsidiary’s sales channels have been refocused from its historical operations to operate consistently with the Company’s brokerage strategy. The refocusing has caused sales in certain high commission products to decline at Busey Bank N.A. The Company remains committed to providing leading trust and brokerage services to the southwest Florida market, but on terms consistent with the Company’s strategy.
Security gains on sales increased significantly for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007. The Company holds a security with a substantially higher value as compared to its cost. As the price of this security reaches certain levels, the Company believes a prudent liquidation strategy for this security is appropriate.
The increase in other income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 related primarily to a non-recurring $630,000 pre-tax charge recorded in the second quarter of 2006 to write-off unamortized offering costs in conjunction with a redemption of trust preferred securities. The charge was recorded in other income as the Company records the results of its unconsolidated trusts into the other operating income line. The impact of the charge in 2006 led to the significant 2007 year-to-date increase in other operating income. The increase for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 over the same period of 2006 primarily relates to the merger with Main Street.
OTHER EXPENSE
TABLE 4 - OTHER EXPENSE
THREE and NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 AND 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30 | | Nine Months Ended September 30 | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | % Change | | 2007 | | 2006 | | % Change | |
| |
| |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| |
| |
Compensation expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries & wages | | $ | 11,698 | | $ | 6,609 | | 77.0 | % | | $ | 25,397 | | $ | 19,878 | | 27.8 | % | |
Employee benefits | | | 2,058 | | | 1,509 | | 36.4 | % | | | 4,995 | | | 4,457 | | 12.1 | % | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total compensation expense | | $ | 13,756 | | $ | 8,118 | | 69.5 | % | | $ | 30,392 | | $ | 24,335 | | 24.9 | % | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net occupancy expense of premises | | | 1,988 | | | 1,310 | | 51.8 | % | | | 4,814 | | | 3,814 | | 26.2 | % | |
Furniture and equipment expenses | | | 1,370 | | | 929 | | 47.5 | % | | | 3,049 | | | 2,677 | | 13.9 | % | |
Data processing | | | 1,715 | | | 450 | | 281.1 | % | | | 2,731 | | | 1,344 | | 103.2 | % | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | 876 | | | 353 | | 148.2 | % | | | 1,385 | | | 1,057 | | 31.0 | % | |
Other operating expenses | | | 4,690 | | | 3,371 | | 39.1 | % | | | 11,244 | | | 10,234 | | 9.9 | % | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total other expense | | $ | 24,395 | | $ | 14,531 | | 67.9 | % | | $ | 53,615 | | $ | 43,461 | | 23.4 | % | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income taxes | | $ | 5,324 | | $ | 4,129 | | 28.9 | % | | $ | 12,777 | | $ | 11,423 | | 11.9 | % | |
Effective rate on income taxes | | | 31.6 | % | | 35.1 | % | | | | | 32.0 | % | | 34.6 | % | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Efficiency ratio | | | 56.7 | % | | 53.8 | % | | | | | 55.1 | % | | 55.0 | % | | | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
Compensation expense increased significantly for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to the merger and related expenses. At the close of the merger, certain executives of the Company were paid a total of $1.5 million in contractual severance payments, without which the increase to compensation expense was 54.3%. Additionally, compensation related expenses for Main Street Bank & Trust and FirsTech totaled $3.7 million since the merger date.
Data processing expenses increased significantly for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 primarily due to infrastructure investments the Company made related to the growth from the merger and to prepare itself for the future growth management is anticipating. Management expects data processing expenses to be up over historical levels, but the increases evident in Table 4 are not expected to be sustained once the infrastructure projects are completed.
25 of 39
Amortization expense increased significantly for the third quarter of 2007 due to increased identifiable intangibles related to the merger. The amortization levels are subject to revision as new information is obtained by us or made available from third parties.
Overall, the increase in other expense for the 2007 periods in Table 4 related primarily to the merger with Main Street. The merger related costs are the operating costs of the subsidiaries assumed and the infrastructure related charges mentioned previously. Management is working toward recognizing the cost efficiencies inherent in the merger, of which only a small portion have been recognized to date.
Income tax expense increased for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007, which was consistent with expectations as income before taxes increased. The effective rate on income taxes, or income taxes divided by income before taxes, has decreased for the 2007 periods as compared to the 2006 periods presented in Table 4. The decline in the effective rate on income taxes was primarily due to tax favored lending activities, increased deductions for dividend payments related to the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan, income on life insurance and decreased amortization of certain intangibles.
The efficiency ratio is total other expense, less amortization charges, as a percentage of tax equivalent net-interest margin plus other income, less security gains and losses. The efficiency ratio for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 increased over the comparable periods in 2006. The two primary reasons for the increase were the large increases in data processing expenses and one-time severance payments. Excluding the severance payments, the efficiency ratio was 53.1% and 53.6% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
TABLE 5 – SIGNIFICANT BALANCE SHEET ITEMS
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 | | % Change | |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets | | | |
Securities available for sale | | $ | 697,802 | | $ | 365,608 | | | 90.9 | % |
Loans, net | | | 3,002,683 | | | 1,933,339 | | | 55.3 | % |
Total assets | | | 4,288,150 | | | 2,509,514 | | | 70.9 | % |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest bearing | | $ | 454,875 | | $ | 246,440 | | | 84.6 | % |
Interest bearing | | | 2,912,933 | | | 1,768,399 | | | 64.7 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits | | | 3,367,808 | | | 2,014,839 | | | 67.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 3,749,876 | | | 2,324,240 | | | 61.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | $ | 538,274 | | $ | 185,274 | | | 190.5 | % |
The Company’s balance sheet experienced significant growth during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 (See Table 5). The largest portion of the growth resulted from the merger with Main Street. As of September 30, 2007, Main Street Bank & Trust’s securities portfolio totaled $353.0 million, or 50.6% of the consolidated securities portfolio, net loans totaled $1.00 billion, or 33.3% of the consolidated net loan portfolio, noninterest-bearing deposits totaled $221.0 million, or 48.6% of consolidated noninterest-bearing deposits, and interest-bearing deposits totaled $1.06 billion, or 36.4% of consolidated interest-bearing deposits.
The securities portfolio continued to see minimal growth as our loan-to-deposit ratio remained above 90%. The securities portfolio is expected to stay flat over the near-term as the Company utilized funds totaling approximately $79.0 million in the divestiture of five Main Street Bank & Trust banking centers which occurred in November 2007.
26 of 39
Non-merger related loan growth was modest as compared to prior years, $68.9 million or 3.5% from December 31, 2006. As our non-performing loans increased, coupled with the credit issues in our lending marketplaces, the available lending opportunities that met our underwriting standards declined.
The growth in noninterest-bearing deposits was almost entirely related to the merger, with Main Street Bank & Trust contributing $347.6 million. Non-merger related levels remained flat from December 31, 2006.
Main Street Bank & Trust contributed $1.05 billion of interest-bearing deposits. Interest-bearing deposits unrelated to the merger grew $99.3 million, or 5.6% from year-end 2006. The overall growth in non-merger related deposits was primarily due to favorable interest rates on interest-bearing deposits.
Stockholder’s equity increased $353.0 million, largely due to the effects of the merger.
ASSET QUALITY
TABLE 6 – NON-PERFORMING LOANS & ALLOWANCE SUMMARY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2007 | | June 30, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 | | September 30, 2006 | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
Non-accrual loans | | | $ | 17,847 | | | $ | 8,066 | | | $ | 5,763 | | | $ | 4,144 | |
Loans 90+ days past due, still accruing | | | | 6,065 | | | | 2,326 | | | | 2,002 | | | | 2,176 | |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
Total non-performing loans | | | $ | 23,912 | | | $ | 10,392 | | | $ | 7,765 | | | $ | 6,320 | |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
Other real estate owned | | | $ | 2,131 | | | $ | 1,816 | | | $ | 720 | | | $ | 820 | |
Other assets acquired in satisfaction of debts previously contracted | | | | 7 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 4 | |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
Total non-performing other assets | | | $ | 2,138 | | | $ | 1,817 | | | $ | 721 | | | $ | 824 | |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
Total non-performing loans and non-performing other assets | | | $ | 26,050 | | | $ | 12,209 | | | $ | 8,486 | | | $ | 7,144 | |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | $ | 38,198 | | | $ | 24,135 | | | $ | 23,588 | | | $ | 23,552 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses to loans | | | | 1.26 | % | | | 1.22 | % | | | 1.21 | % | | | 1.24 | % |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans | | | | 159.7 | % | | | 232.2 | % | | | 303.8 | % | | | 372.7 | % |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
Non-performing loans to loans, before allowance for loan losses | | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.52 | % | | | 0.40 | % | | | 0.33 | % |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
Non-performing loans and non-performing other assets to loans, before allowance for loan losses | | | | 0.86 | % | | | 0.62 | % | | | 0.43 | % | | | 0.37 | % |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
The Company’s non-performing loans and other assets increased more significantly, $13.8 million or 113.4%, in the three month period ended September 30, 2007 than in the prior three quarters, none of which experienced increases greater than 34%. Of the $13.8 million increase, $6.6 million was attributable to the non-performing assets of Main Street Bank & Trust. The remaining increase of $7.2 million in non-performing loans and other assets primarily related to the decline in the residential housing market in southwest Florida. The Company has a significant commercial residential real estate portfolio in the southwest Florida marketplace. The real estate market in southwest Florida is one of the most negatively impacted areas in the United States. The Company does not underwrite sub-prime loans.
Non-accrual loans increased $9.8 million, or 121.3%, from June 30, 2007 to September 30, 2007 and $12.1 million, or 209.7%, from December 31, 2006. In the third quarter of 2007, Busey Bank placed a $4.6 million loan on non-accrual related to the loan production office (LPO) in Florida. The Busey Bank LPO loan and $5.4 million of non-accrual loans at Main Street Bank & Trust accounted for the increase in non-accrual loans for the Company since June 30, 2007. Busey Bank and Busey Bank N.A. had $7.0 million and $5.5 million in non-accrual loans at September 30, 2007, respectively.
27 of 39
Loans 90+ days past due, still accruing increased $3.7 million, or 160.7%, at September 30, 2007 as compared to June 30, 2007 and $4.1 million, or 202.9%, from December 31, 2006. Main Street Bank & Trust had $1.2 million of loans 90+ days past due, still accruing at September 30, 2007. Busey Bank and Busey Bank N.A. had $3.7 million and $1.1 million in loans 90+ days past due, still accruing at September 30, 2007, respectively.
The allowance for loan losses increased to $38.2 million, up $14.1 million and $14.6 million from June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Main Street Bank & Trust’s allowance for loan losses of $12.9 million recorded in the merger accounted for the majority of the increase in the allowance. The allowance as a percentage of loans reached 1.26%, the highest level in a year, reflecting the increased credit risks in our loan portfolios. The allowance as a percentage of non-performing loans declined to 159.7%, the lowest level in a year.
The Company continues to attempt to identify problem loan situations on a proactive basis. Once problem loans are identified, adjustments to the provision are made based upon all information available at that time. The increase in provision reflects managements’ analysis of amounts necessary to cover potential losses in our loan portfolios. The Company believes the level of the allowance and coverage of non-performing loans to be appropriate based upon the current information available. However, additional losses may be identified in our loan portfolio as new information is obtained. The Company may need to provide for additional loan losses in the future as management continues to identify potential problem loans and gain further information concerning existing problem loans, particularly in the southwest Florida market.
POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS
Potential problem loans are those loans which are not categorized as impaired, non-accrual, past due or restructured, but where current information indicates that the borrower may not be able to comply with present loan repayment terms. Management assesses the potential for loss on such loans as it would with other problem loans and has considered the effect of any potential loss in determining its provision for loan losses. Potential problem loans totaled $14.4 million at September 30, 2007, as compared to $11.9 million as of December 31, 2006. The increase in potential problem loans related to the decline in the overall real estate markets and the current economic and credit environment.
There are no other loans identified which management currently believes represent, or result from, trends or uncertainties which management reasonably expects will materially impact future operating results, liquidity or capital resources. There are no other credits identified about which management is aware of any information which causes management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrower(s) to comply with the loan repayment terms.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity management is the process by which the Company ensures that adequate liquid funds are available to meet the present and future cash flow obligations arising in the daily operations of the business. These financial obligations consist of needs for funds to meet commitments to borrowers for extensions of credit, funding capital expenditures, withdrawals by customers, maintaining deposit reserve requirements, servicing debt, paying dividends to stockholders, repurchasing stock and paying operating expenses.
The Company’s most liquid assets are cash and due from banks, interest-bearing bank deposits, and Federal funds sold. The balances of these assets are dependent on the Company’s operating, investing, lending and financing activities during any given period.
The Company’s primary sources of funds consist of deposits, investment maturities and sales, loan principal repayments, and capital funds. Additional liquidity is provided by brokered deposits, bank lines of credit, repurchase agreements and the ability to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank. The Company has an operating line in the amount of $10.0 million, of which $2.0 million was available as of September 30, 2007. Management intends to satisfy long-term liquidity needs primarily through retention of capital funds.
28 of 39
The objective of liquidity management by the Company is to ensure that funds will be available to meet demand in a timely and efficient manner. Based upon the level of investment securities that reprice within 30 days and 90 days, management currently believes that adequate liquidity exists to meet all projected cash flow obligations. The Company achieves a satisfactory degree of liquidity through actively managing both assets and liabilities. Asset management guides the proportion of liquid assets to total assets, while liability management monitors future funding requirements and prices liabilities accordingly.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Other than from the issuance of common stock, the Company’s primary source of capital is retained net income. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company earned $27.1 million and paid dividends of $12.7 million to stockholders, resulting in the retention of current earnings of $14.4 million. The Company’s dividend payout ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 46.7%.
The Company and its bank subsidiaries are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve the quantitative measure of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and its bank subsidiaries to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of September 30, 2007, that the Company and its bank subsidiaries met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Actual | | For Capital Adequacy Purposes | | To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions | |
| |
| |
| | Amount | | Ratio | | Amount | | Ratio | | Amount | | Ratio | |
| |
| |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of September 30, 2007: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated | | $ | 356,382 | | | 11.04 | % | $ | 258,208 | | | 8.00 | % | | N/A | | | N/A | |
Busey Bank | | $ | 184,599 | | | 11.03 | % | $ | 133,926 | | | 8.00 | % | $ | 167,408 | | | 10.00% | |
Main Street Bank & Trust | | $ | 143,109 | | | 12.22 | % | $ | 93,712 | | | 8.00 | % | $ | 117,139 | | | 10.00% | |
Busey Bank N.A. | | $ | 52,113 | | | 14.64 | % | $ | 28,473 | | | 8.00 | % | $ | 35,591 | | | 10.00% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated | | $ | 315,015 | | | 9.76 | % | $ | 129,104 | | | 4.00 | % | | N/A | | | N/A | |
Busey Bank | | $ | 161,689 | | | 9.66 | % | $ | 66,963 | | | 4.00 | % | $ | 100,445 | | | 6.00% | |
Main Street Bank & Trust | | $ | 130,108 | | | 11.11 | % | $ | 46,856 | | | 4.00 | % | $ | 70,284 | | | 6.00% | |
Busey Bank N.A. | | $ | 47,661 | | | 13.39 | % | $ | 14,237 | | | 4.00 | % | $ | 21,355 | | | 6.00% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated | | $ | 315,015 | | | 9.44 | % | $ | 133,503 | | | 4.00 | % | | N/A | | | N/A | |
Busey Bank | | $ | 161,689 | | | 8.01 | % | $ | 80,784 | | | 4.00 | % | $ | 100,980 | | | 5.00% | |
Main Street Bank & Trust | | $ | 130,108 | | | 9.50 | % | $ | 54,811 | | | 4.00 | % | $ | 68,514 | | | 5.00% | |
Busey Bank N.A. | | $ | 47,661 | | | 11.05 | % | $ | 17,254 | | | 4.00 | % | $ | 21,567 | | | 5.00% | |
29 of 39
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document may contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events. A number of factors, many of which are beyond the ability of the Company to control or predict, could cause actual results to differ materially from those in its forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the following: (i) the strength of the local and national economy; (ii) the economic impact of any future terrorist threats or attacks; (iii) changes in state and federal laws, regulations and governmental policies concerning the Company’s general business; (iv) changes in interest rates and prepayment rates of the Company’s assets; (v) increased competition in the financial services sector and the inability to attract new customers; (vi) changes in technology and the ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems; (vii) the loss of key executives or employees; (viii) changes in consumer spending; (ix) unexpected results of acquisitions; (x) unexpected outcomes of existing or new litigation involving the Company; and (xi) changes in accounting policies and practices. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additional information concerning the Company and its business, including additional factors that could materially affect the Company’s financial results, is included in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Critical accounting estimates are those that are critical to the portrayal and understanding of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management to make assumptions that are difficult, subjective or complex. These estimates involve judgments, estimates and uncertainties that are susceptible to change. In the event that different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, and depending on the severity of such changes, the possibility of materially different financial condition or results of operations is a reasonable likelihood. The two most significant estimates, allowance for loan losses and revenue recognition are discussed in this section. A full discussion of the Company’s critical accounting estimates is located in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Company has established an allowance for loan losses which represents the Company’s estimate of the probable losses that have occurred as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. Management has established an allowance for loan losses which reduces the total loans outstanding by an estimate of uncollectible loans. Loans deemed uncollectible are charged against and reduce the allowance. Periodically, a provision for loan losses is charged to current expense. A provision acts to replenish the allowance for loan losses and to maintain the allowance at a level that management deems adequate.
There is no precise method of predicting specific loan losses or amounts which ultimately may be charged off on segments of the loan portfolio. The determination that a loan may become uncollectible, in whole or in part, is a matter of judgment. Similarly, the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses can be determined only on a judgmental basis, after full review, including (a) consideration of economic conditions and their effect on particular industries and specific borrowers; (b) a review of borrowers’ financial data, together with industry data, the competitive situation, the borrowers’ management capabilities and other factors; (c) a continuing evaluation of the loan portfolio, including monitoring by lending officers and staff credit personnel of all loans which are identified as being of less than acceptable quality; (d) an in-depth evaluation, on a monthly basis, of all impaired loans (loans are considered to be impaired when based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due); and (e) an evaluation of the underlying collateral for secured lending, including the use of independent appraisals of real estate properties securing loans.
30 of 39
Periodic provisions for loan losses are determined by management based upon the size and the quality of the loan portfolio measured against prevailing economic conditions and historical loan loss experience and also based on specific exposures in the portfolio. Management has instituted a formal loan review system supported by an effective credit analysis and control process. The Company will maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb estimated uncollectible loans and, therefore, expects to make periodic additions to the allowance for loan losses.
Revenue Recognition
Income on interest-earning assets is accrued based on the effective yield of the underlying financial instruments. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due. The accrual of interest income on impaired loans is discontinued when there is reasonable doubt as to the borrower’s ability to meet contractual payments of interest or principal.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of change in asset values due to movements in underlying market rates and prices. Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and capital arising from movements in interest rates. Interest rate risk is the most significant market risk affecting the Company as other types of market risk, such as foreign currency exchange rate risk and commodity price risk, do not arise in the normal course of the Company’s business activities.
The Company’s subsidiary banks, Busey Bank, Main Street Bank & Trust and Busey Bank N.A., have asset-liability committees which meet at least quarterly to review current market conditions and attempt to structure the banks’ balance sheets to ensure stable net interest income despite potential changes in interest rates with all other variables constant.
The asset-liability committees use gap analysis to identify mismatches in the dollar value of assets and liabilities subject to repricing within specific time periods. The Funds Management Policies established by the asset-liability committees and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors establish guidelines for maintaining the ratio of cumulative rate-sensitive assets to rate-sensitive liabilities within prescribed ranges at certain intervals.
Interest-rate sensitivity is a measure of the volatility of the net interest margin as a consequence of changes in market rates. The rate-sensitivity chart shows the interval of time in which given volumes of rate-sensitive earning assets and rate-sensitive interest-bearing liabilities would be responsive to changes in market interest rates based on their contractual maturities or terms for repricing. It is, however, only a static, single-day depiction of the Company’s rate sensitivity structure, which can be adjusted in response to changes in forecasted interest rates.
31 of 39
The following table sets forth the static rate-sensitivity analysis of the Company as of September 30, 2007:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rate Sensitive Within | |
| |
| |
| | 1-30 Days | | 31-90 Days | | 91-180 Days | | 181 Days - 1 Year | | Over 1 Year | | Total | |
| |
| |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits | | $ | 275 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 275 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 43,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 43,000 | |
Investment securities U.S. Governments | | | 192,831 | | | 35,228 | | | 70,888 | | | 81,621 | | | 142,520 | | | 523,088 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 853 | | | 13,555 | | | 8,081 | | | 2,438 | | | 69,897 | | | 94,824 | |
Other securities | | | 29,973 | | | 2,374 | | | 2,331 | | | 7,460 | | | 37,752 | | | 79,890 | |
Loans (net of unearned int.) | | | 1,109,035 | | | 174,506 | | | 193,862 | | | 405,780 | | | 1,157,698 | | | 3,040,881 | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total rate-sensitive assets | | $ | 1,375,967 | | $ | 225,663 | | $ | 275,162 | | $ | 497,299 | | $ | 1,407,867 | | $ | 3,781,958 | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing transaction deposits | | $ | 231,125 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 231,125 | |
Savings deposits | | | 152,212 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 152,212 | |
Money market deposits | | | 1,103,241 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,103,241 | |
Time deposits | | | 205,748 | | | 257,700 | | | 260,918 | | | 368,805 | | | 333,184 | | | 1,426,355 | |
Short-term borrowings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements | | | 132,849 | | | 6 | | | 2,000 | | | 2,608 | | | — | | | 137,463 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | — | | | 8,000 | | | 13,023 | | | — | | | — | | | 21,023 | |
Long-term debt | | | — | | | — | | | 40,000 | | | 18,000 | | | 77,825 | | | 135,825 | |
Junior subordinated debt owed To unconsolidated trusts | | | — | | | 25,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 30,000 | | | 55,000 | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total rate-sensitive liabilities | | $ | 1,825,175 | | $ | 290,706 | | $ | 315,941 | | $ | 389,413 | | $ | 441,009 | | $ | 3,262,244 | |
Rate-sensitive assets less rate-sensitive liabilities | | $ | (449,208 | ) | $ | (65,043 | ) | $ | (40,779 | ) | $ | 107,886 | | $ | 966,858 | | $ | 519,714 | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Cumulative Gap | | $ | (449,208 | ) | $ | (514,251 | ) | $ | (555,030 | ) | $ | (447,144 | ) | $ | 519,714 | | | | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
Cumulative amounts as a percentage of total rate-sensitive assets | | | (11.88 | %) | | (13.60 | %) | | (14.68 | %) | | (11.82 | %) | | 13.74 | % | | | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
Cumulative ratio | | | 0.75 | | | 0.76 | | | 0.77 | | | 0.84 | | | 1.16 | | | | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
The funds management policy of the Company requires the banks to maintain a cumulative rate-sensitivity ratio of .75 – 1.25 in the 90-day, 180-day, and 1-year time periods. As of September 30, 2007, the banks are within those guidelines.
The foregoing table shows a cumulative negative (liability-sensitive) rate-sensitivity gap of $447.1 million through one year as there were more liabilities subject to repricing during those time periods than there were assets subject to repricing within those same time periods. The volume of assets subject to repricing exceeds the volume of liabilities subject to repricing beyond one year. The composition of the gap structure at September 30, 2007, indicates the Company would benefit more if interest rates decrease during the next year by allowing the net interest margin to grow as the volume of interest-bearing liabilities subject to repricing would be greater than the volume of interest-earning assets subject to repricing during the same period, assuming rates on all categories of rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities change by the same amount and at the over the same period.
32 of 39
The Company’s asset/liability committees do not rely solely on gap analysis to manage interest-rate risk as interest rate changes do not impact all categories of assets and liabilities equally or simultaneously. The committees supplement gap analysis with balance sheet and income simulation analysis to determine the potential impact on net interest income of changes in market interest rates. In these simulation models the balance sheet is projected over a one-year period and net interest income is calculated under current market rates, and then assuming permanent instantaneous shifts of +/-100 basis points and +/-200 basis points. Management measures such changes assuming immediate and sustained shifts in the Federal funds rate and the corresponding shifts in other rate indices based on their historical changes relative to changes in the Federal funds rate. The model assumes asset and liability remain constant at September 30, 2007, balances. The model assumes repricing frequency on all variable-rate assets and liabilities. The model also assumes a historical decay rate on all fixed-rate core deposit balances. Prepayment speeds on loans have been adjusted up and down to incorporate expected prepayment in both a declining and rising rate environment. Utilizing this measurement concept the interest rate risk of the Company, expressed as a change in net interest income as a percentage of the net income calculated in the constant base model, due to an immediate and sustained change in interest rates at September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Basis Point Changes | |
| |
| |
| | - 200 | | - 100 | | + 100 | | + 200 | |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2007 | | (4.41 | %) | | (1.52 | %) | | (0.79 | %) | | (2.04 | %) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2006 | | 2.17 | % | | 1.78 | % | | (2.12 | %) | | (4.11 | %) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
33 of 39
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company conducted an evaluation, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2007. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods required by the SEC.
Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2007, were effective.
The evaluation of controls related to Main Street Bank & Trust and FirsTech was deferred to the fourth quarter of 2007. The Company is not aware of any control ineffectiveness within Main Street Bank & Trust or FirsTech.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, the Company did not make any significant changes in its internal control over financial reporting or other factors that could significantly affect these controls.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
| |
ITEM 1: | Legal Proceedings |
| |
| Not Applicable |
| |
ITEM 1A: | Risk Factors |
| |
| There have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company’s Form S-4 filing dated January 12, 2007. |
| |
ITEM 2: | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
| |
| The following table presents for the periods indicated a summary of the purchases made by or on behalf of the Company of shares of its common stock. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs 1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 1 – 31, 2007 | | | 9,000 | | | | 18.98 | | | 9,000 | | | 497,955 | |
August 1 – 31, 2007 | | | 54,000 | | | | 19.77 | | | 54,000 | | | 488,955 | |
September 1 – 30, 2007 | | | 301,400 | | | | 20.72 | | | 301,400 | | | 434,955 | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
Total | | | 374,400 | | | $ | 20.53 | | | 374,400 | | | 133,555 | |
1 The Company’s board of directors approved a stock purchase plan on February 17, 2004 for the repurchase of up to 750,000 shares of common stock. The Company’s 2004 repurchase plan has no expiration date.
34 of 39
| |
ITEM 3: | Defaults upon Senior Securities |
| |
| Not Applicable |
| |
ITEM 4: | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
| |
| Not Applicable |
| |
ITEM 5: | Other Information |
| |
| (a) None |
| |
| (b) Not Applicable |
| |
ITEM 6: | Exhibits |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST BUSEY CORPORATION
(Registrant)
| | | |
| | By: | //Van A. Dukeman// |
| | |
|
|
| | | Van A. Dukeman |
| | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | (Principal executive officer) |
| | | |
| | By: | //Barbara J. Harrington// |
| | |
|
|
| | | Barbara J. Harrington |
| | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | | (Principal financial and accounting officer) |
Date: November 9, 2007
35 of 39