We have reviewed our critical accounting policies, critical accounting estimates and the related disclosures with our Audit Committee. These policies and procedures related to the policies are described further in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies.”
Prior to July 29, 2005, we maintained two credit agreements (the “Former Credit Agreements”) that in the aggregate provided a $65.0 million multi-currency committed line of credit, which expired on July 31, 2005. The lenders (the “Lenders”) under the Former Credit Agreements were Bank of America, N.A., Wachovia Bank, N.A., and US Bank. The Former Credit Agreements were secured by all inventory and receivables located in the United States and the stock of certain of our subsidiaries.
The interest rate under the Former Credit Agreements for U.S. dollar advances was at the Bank of America prime rate, plus an additional 25 to 150 basis points, depending upon our consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for the immediately preceding four calendar quarters. The interest rate for foreign currency advances was at the LIBOR rate for the applicable denominated currency, plus an additional 150 to 250 basis points, depending upon our consolidated EBITDA for the immediately preceding four calendar quarters. The Former Credit Agreements required that we pay insignificant commitment fees on the unused portion of the line of credit to the Lenders. In addition, the Former Credit Agreements contained certain financial covenants and restrictions on our ability to assume additional debt and pay cash dividends.
Effective July 29, 2005, we (and our subsidiaries) entered into two new credit agreements (the “New Credit Agreements”) that in the aggregate offer a four-year $65.0 million multi-currency committed line of credit, expiring on July 31, 2009. The Lenders under the New Credit Agreements are Bank of America, N.A., Wachovia Bank, N.A., and US Bank. The facilities are secured by 65% of the capital stock of our Ireland subsidiary and 100% of the capital stock of all other subsidiaries as well as all inventory and receivables located in the United States.
The interest rate under the New Credit Agreements is at the LIBOR rate plus 125 to 200 basis points, depending upon our consolidated EBITDA for the immediately preceding four calendar quarters. Under the terms of the New Credit Agreements, we paid certain upfront fees and arrangement fees, totaling approximately $0.2 million. Additionally, we are required to pay insignificant commitment fees on the unused portion of the line of credit to the Lenders. The New Credit Agreements also contain certain financial covenants and restrictions on our ability to assume additional debt, repurchase stock, sell subsidiaries, or acquire companies. In case of an event of default, as defined in the New Credit Agreements, that is not cured within the applicable cure period (with respect to those defaults for which the New Credit Agreements provide a cure period), the Lenders’ remedies include their ability to declare all outstanding loans, plus interest and other related amounts owed, to be immediately due and payable in full, and to pursue all rights and remedies available to them under the New Credit Agreements or under applicable law.
We also have a credit relationship with a European bank of EUR 1.0 million (approximately $1.2 million at the March 31, 2006 exchange rate). Under the terms of this facility, we may borrow in the form of either a line of credit or term debt. The amount available to borrow is reduced by approximately EUR 0.2 million (approximately $0.2 million at the March 31, 2006 exchange rate) for German guarantees. As we have significant international operations, our Euro-denominated borrowings do not represent a significant foreign exchange risk. On an overall basis, we monitor our cash and debt positions in each currency in an effort to reduce our foreign exchange risk.
As of March 31, 2006, approximately $1.7 million was outstanding on the lines of credit, consisting of the following:
As of March 31, 2006, we had approximately $64.3 million borrowing capacity under the New Credit Agreements and Euro-denominated facility. The amount available to borrow was reduced by approximately $0.2 million for German guarantees. The weighted-average interest rate on the outstanding balances under the lines of credit as of March 31, 2006 was 2.5%.
As discussed above, under “Share-Based Compensation Expenses,” in December 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R). The statement became effective July 1, 2005, and requires the windfall tax benefits from stock option exercises to be classified as cash outflows from operating activities, with the corresponding amount also classified as cash inflows from financing activities, and also requires us to expense the fair value of grants made under the stock option program. As a result, net cash flows provided by operating activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 of approximately $67.9 million and approximately $49.1 million, respectively, are not comparable because for the nine months ended March 31, 2006, approximately $12.2 million in tax benefits from stock option exercises is classified as cash inflows from financing activities, compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2005 for which the tax benefits from stock option exercises are classified as a component of cash provided by operations.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 was approximately $67.9 million. Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 was approximately $49.1 million. We used approximately $25.4 million for investing activities, of which approximately $13.2 million was used to acquire CommercialWare in February 2006, approximately $8.3 million was used to purchase property, plant, and equipment, and approximately $3.4 million was used to internally develop software. We also used approximately $13.1 million for financing activities, of which approximately $40.2 million was used to repurchase our common stock, partially offset by proceeds of approximately $15.9 million from the issuance of our common stock for stock option exercises and approximately $12.2 million in windfall tax benefits from the stock option exercises. All cash is being retained for the operation and expansion of the business and the repurchase of our common stock.
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, we entered into a third amendment to our lease for our headquarters facility in Columbia, Maryland, pursuant to which the term of the lease was extended to February 28, 2016.
We anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations along with our available lines of credit are sufficient to provide our working capital needs for the next 12 months. We also believe that our cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations along with our available lines of credit will be sufficient to provide our working capital needs for the foreseeable future. However, if for any reason, we need to raise additional funds, we believe we will be able to raise additional funds either thru the issuance of our common stock or by entering into additional financing agreements. We currently anticipate that our property, plant and equipment expenditures for fiscal year 2006 will be approximately $1.0 million higher than in fiscal year 2005.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements (as defined in the applicable regulations) that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.
Contractual obligations
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, we entered into a third amendment to our lease for our headquarters facility in Columbia, Maryland, pursuant to which the term of the lease was extended to February 28, 2016. As a result of this amendment, our operating lease obligations have increased by approximately $25.5 million, primarily in the more than 5 years time frame.
Recent accounting standards
FASB Staff Position No. 123(R)-3
In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 123(R)-3 (“FSP FAS 123(R)-3”), “Transition Election to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards,” which provides a practical transition election related to accounting for the tax effects of share-based payments awards to employees of either the transition guidance for the additional-paid-in-capital pool as prescribed in SFAS No. 123(R), or the alternative transition method as described in the FSP. An entity that adopts SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective application may make a one-time election to adopt the transition method described in the FSP. An entity may take up to one year from the latter of its initial adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) or the effective date of this FSP to evaluate its available transition alternative and make its one-time election. The FSP FAS 123(R)-3 became effective in November 2005. At this time, we are evaluating the potential effects of FSP FAS 123(R)-3 on our consolidated financial position and results of operations and whether to elect the transition alternative available under FSP FAS 123(R)-3.
SFAS No. 154
�� In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” This statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and requires retrospective application to prior periods’ consolidated financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This statement also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate affected by a change in accounting principle. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. SFAS No. 154 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Factors that may affect future results
In light of current market conditions, and world political and economic uncertainty, it is difficult to determine whether we can continue to achieve revenue and profitability growth in the next year. This is especially true since the primary industries we serve, the hospitality, travel, restaurant, and retail industries, are highly sensitive to economic, political and environmental disturbances, all of which are not only outside of our control, but also extraordinarily difficult to predict with any accuracy. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any particular level of growth is reasonable or can be achieved. In addition, due to the competitive nature of the market, we continue to experience gross margin pressure on our products (both hardware and software) and service offerings, and we expect product and service margins to decline. There can be no assurance that we will be able to increase sufficiently the sales of our higher margin products, including software, to prevent future declines in our overall gross margin. Additionally, given the fact that we conduct business in many different currencies, currency fluctuations directly affect our financial results. As we conduct significant business in Europe, a weakening or strengthening Euro could significantly affect our financial performance.
25
Moreover, our quarterly financial results are dependent upon the timing and size of customer orders and the shipment of products for large orders. Large software orders from customers may account for more than an insignificant portion of earnings in any quarter. We expect the list of customers with whom we do the largest amount of business to vary from year to year as a result of the timing of the rollout of each customer’s system. Further, if a customer delays or accelerates its delivery requirements, or if a product’s completion is delayed or accelerated, revenues that we may have expected in a given quarter could be deferred or accelerated into subsequent or earlier quarters, respectively.
The market price of our common stock is volatile, and may be subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in our quarterly operating results and other factors, such as announcements of technological developments or new products by us, customer rollouts, technological advances and new products announced by existing and new competitors, and general market conditions in the hospitality and retail industries. In addition, conditions in the stock market in general and shares of technology companies in particular have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations, which have, at times, been unrelated to the operating performance of the companies.
Past performance is not necessarily a strong or reliable indicator of future performance. Actual results could differ materially from past results, estimates, or projections, or forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of us. Some of our risks and uncertainties are listed in Part II, Item 1A Risk Factors, contained in this Form 10-Q. These are in addition to those other risks and uncertainties disclosed in our periodic press releases and SEC filings, including in the section titled “Business and Investment Risks; Information Relating to Forward-Looking Statements,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2005.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company recorded foreign sales, including exports from the United States, of approximately $232.9 million and approximately $201.9 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, to customers located primarily in Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Australia, Asia, Latin America and Canada.
The Company’s significant international business and presence expose the Company to certain market risks, such as currency fluctuation, interest rate changes, and political risks. With respect to currency risk, the Company transacts business in different currencies through its foreign subsidiaries. The fluctuation of currencies affects sales and profitability. Frequently, sales and the costs associated with those sales are not denominated in the same currency.
In the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company transacted business in 27 currencies and 22 currencies, respectively.
The relative currency mix for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
| | % of Reported Revenue | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | Nine Months Ended March 31, | | Exchange Rates March 31, | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Revenues by currency (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States Dollar | | | 57 | % | | 59 | % | | 59 | % | | 58 | % | | 1.0000 | | | 1.0000 | |
European Euro | | | 23 | % | | 21 | % | | 21 | % | | 21 | % | | 1.2121 | | | 1.2961 | |
British Pound Sterling | | | 5 | % | | 6 | % | | 5 | % | | 7 | % | | 1.7366 | | | 1.8906 | |
Australian Dollar | | | 2 | % | | 2 | % | | 2 | % | | 1 | % | | 0.7167 | | | 0.7734 | |
Mexican Peso | | | 2 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 0.0918 | | | 0.0896 | |
All Other Currencies (2), (3) | | | 11 | % | | 11 | % | | 12 | % | | 12 | % | | 0.0274 | | | 0.0265 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
Total | | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
(1) Calculated using average exchange rates for the period. |
(2) The “% of Reported Revenue,” represents the average weighted three months and nine months exchange rates for all other currencies. |
(3) The “Exchange Rates as of March 31,” represents the average weighted March 31 exchange rates for all other currencies based on the nine month revenue. |
26
The Company has evaluated the effect of a 10% change, both upward and downward, of the Euro in relation to the U.S. dollar. A 10% increase in the value of the Euro in relation to the U.S. dollar versus the Euro in the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2006, would have increased total revenues by approximately $3.9 million, or 2.3%, and approximately $10.1 million, or 2.1%, respectively. A 10% decline in the value of the Euro in relation to the U.S. dollar in the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2006, would have reduced total revenues by approximately $3.9 million, or 2.3%, and approximately $10.1 million, or 2.1%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis assumes a weighted average 10% change in the exchange rate during the respective periods with all other variables being held constant. This sensitivity analysis does not consider the effect of exchange rate changes on either cost of sales, operating expenses, or income taxes, and accordingly, is not necessarily an indicator of the effect of potential exchange rate changes on the Company’s net income.
The Company is also subject to interest rate fluctuations in foreign countries to the extent that the Company elects to borrow in the local foreign currency. In the past, this has not been an issue of concern as the Company has the capacity to elect to borrow in other currencies with more favorable interest rates. While the Company has not invested in financial instruments designed to protect against interest rate fluctuations, the Company will continue to evaluate the need to do so in the future.
The Company had a 3.0 million South African Rand forward contract to hedge the South African Rand note receivable that was recorded on the consolidated balance sheet. The note receivable was collected and the related forward contract was paid off in March 2006. Also, the Company’s committed lines of credit bear interest at a floating rate, which exposes the Company to interest rate risks. The Company manages its exposure to this risk by minimizing, to the extent feasible, overall borrowing and monitoring available financing alternatives.
The Company’s interest rate risk has not changed materially from June 30, 2005, and the Company does not expect any significant changes in exposure or in how it manages this exposure in the near future. The Company uses borrowings under the lines of credit, which expire in July 2009, for general corporate purposes. The Company’s lines of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 125 to 200 basis points, depending on the Company’s consolidated financial performance. At March 31, 2006, the Company had total borrowings of approximately $1.7 million, and had not entered into any instruments to hedge the resulting exposure to interest-rate risk. Management believes that the fair value of the debt equals its carrying value at March 31, 2006. The Company’s exposure to fluctuations in interest rates will increase or decrease in the future with increases or decreases in the outstanding amount under the line of credit.
To minimize the Company’s exposure to credit risk associated with financial instruments, the Company places its cash equivalents with high-credit-quality institutions.
Finally, the Company is subject to political risk, including as a result of instability in the Middle East and the worldwide threat of terrorism, and especially in developing countries with uncertain or unstable political structures or regimes. Contributing to this risk factor is the adverse effect that political instability has on the travel and tourism industries. The Company is also subject to the effects of, and changes in, laws and regulations, and other activities of governments, agencies and similar regulatory organizations. To be able to offer commercially viable and competitive products, the Company must also comply with the rules and regulations of the credit card associations, including their security and data protection rules. As these guidelines are subject to change, the Company could and most likely will have ongoing costs associated with modifying products to remain compliant with these rules.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the Company has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “Disclosure Controls and Procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act). This evaluation was carried out under the supervision of the Company’s management, including A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Gary C. Kaufman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The Company’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), such as this quarterly report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The Company’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures are also designed with the objective of ensuring that the information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
27
The Company does not expect that its Disclosure Controls and Procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. Despite its level of sophistication, detail and thoroughness, a disclosure system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are satisfied. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal control over financial reporting may prevent or detect all misstatements or instances of fraud, if any. Also, any evaluation of effectiveness as to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company has evaluated and will continue periodically to evaluate its Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Based on its most recent evaluations, Messrs. Giannopoulos and Kaufman (the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively) have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the Company’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures in place at the end of the quarter are effective at a reasonable assurance level discussed above.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-l5(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended March 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
28
MICROS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Form 10-Q
For the Three months and Nine months ended March 31, 2006
Part II - Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is and has been involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. The Company is of the opinion, based upon information available as of May 10, 2006, and the advice of counsel concerning pertinent legal matters, that any resulting liability should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Some of our risks and uncertainties are listed below. These are in addition to those other risks and uncertainties disclosed in our periodic press releases and SEC filings, including in the section titled “Business and Investment Risks; Information Relating to Forward-Looking Statements,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2005.
• | Weakness in the hospitality and tourism industries as a result of the ever-present threat of terrorist attacks and the uncertain political situation in the Middle East and parts of Asia; |
| |
• | Environmental and health disasters, including for example, the tsunami disaster in Asia, and Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma. There is also the widespread coverage of certain diseases and viruses, including for example, the avian flu, the fear of which suppresses travel. Environmental and health crises have a material and adverse effect on our business, as not only is there a material reduction in tourism for the pendency of the crises, but there is a mid-term adverse effect on the buying patterns of our customers located in the affected areas. Environmental disasters can also directly adversely affect MICROS’s operations in the affected areas; for example, Hurricane Wilma caused some temporary disruption to: (i) JTECH, whose main office is in Boca Raton, Florida; (ii) MICROS’s regional sales and service office in Deerfield Beach, Florida; and (iii) MICROS’s hotel software development office in Naples, Florida; |
| |
• | Potentially unfavorable adverse economic conditions arising from the U.S. involvement in Iraq and the “war on terrorism” (this is especially true in the hospitality and tourism industry, where geo-political instability has a material adverse effect), and the impact of higher oil prices worldwide. Given the adverse effects on the travel and hospitality industry as a result of the Iraqi situation, we have experienced delays in certain purchases. There can be no guarantee that this slow down will be only short-term; |
| |
• | Our actions in connection with the continued and increasing price and product competition in many product areas, principally hardware (both proprietary hardware and hardware that we resell), and the pressure on profit margins for those items; |
| |
• | Fluctuations or adverse declines of gross margins due to product mix that cannot be accurately predicted quarter to quarter; |
| |
• | Difficulties or delays in the development, production, testing, and marketing of products, including the failure to deliver new products and technologies when scheduled, announced, or generally anticipated; the failure of customers to accept products or technologies when planned; any defects in products; our inability to differentiate our products; and a failure of manufacturing efforts, whether internal or through our third party manufacturing entities; |
| |
• | The inherent difficulties in accurately predicting buying patterns, especially since more than an insignificant portion of the business is not major account business and, accordingly, is much harder to forecast, and appropriately staffing and preparing for fluctuations in buying demand; |
29
• | Because large orders from customers may account for more than an insignificant portion of earnings in any particular quarter or year, the commencement and the completion of deployments, and changes in planned roll-outs (whether delays or accelerations) can significantly affect revenues and revenue forecasts; |
| |
• | Consolidations, acquisitions, and mergers of our customers in the hospitality and retail industries can delay or eliminate sales and ongoing revenue opportunities; |
| |
• | Implementation and operation of a cost-effective service structure capable of servicing increasingly complex software systems in more remote locations; additional costs and expenses associated with servicing and supporting open systems, which generally incorporate third party software products (the support and service of which may be more difficult and costly); difficulty in implementing, operating, and maintaining and supporting centrally hosted systems, such as central reservation systems, and centrally-hosted property management systems and reporting systems; |
| |
• | Unanticipated manufacturing, supply, service or labor difficulties experienced by our vendors, including those that may result in a disruption or discontinuation of the services or products provided to us, or difficulties in the manufacturing relationship (certain of the facilities where our products are manufactured may have union workers who may participate in work slow-downs or stoppages); |
| |
• | Unanticipated quality or production difficulties at GES, our supplier of our Workstation 4 hardware point-of-sale terminal, and the recently released 2010 hardware platform; |
| |
• | The technological risks of large customer rollouts, especially where the deployments involve newer technology or third party software; and installations where the customer contracts with us to provide; |
| |
• | The ability to respond quickly and cost-effectively to the introduction of new technologies, including Java and Internet-based technologies; |
| |
• | Because almost half of our sales are outside the U.S., our results could be significantly affected by weak economic conditions in countries in which we do business, and emerging markets in which there tend to be significant growth, and by changes in foreign currency exchange rates affecting those countries; |
| |
• | Adverse fluctuations in foreign currencies – in particular, the Euro and Pound, each of which constitutes a currency in which material amounts of business are transacted; |
| |
• | Conditions in the stock market in general and shares of technology companies in particular have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations, which have, at times, been unrelated to the operating performance of the companies; |
| |
• | Ongoing economic and political turmoil and instability in countries where we maintain a direct sales and service presence, including, for example, Argentina and Brazil; |
| |
• | Our ability to recruit and retain qualified accounting and auditing staff, the failure of which could result in excessive third party accounting and auditing costs and expenses in connection with Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance (in particular, with section 404 of the Act); |
| |
• | Our ability to recruit and retain engineers and other highly skilled personnel; |
| |
• | Although we attempt to protect our proprietary technology through a combination of trade secrets, copyright, trademark law, nondisclosure agreements and technical measures, these protections will not preclude competitors from developing products with features similar to our products; |
| |
• | The costs and other effects of legal and administrative cases and proceedings, settlements and investigations, claims, and changes in those items, and developments or assertions by or against us relating to intellectual property rights and intellectual property licenses; |
30
• | Costs and liabilities associated with actual or perceived security vulnerabilities in the software products we license to our customer base, or software products that third parties license to MICROS; |
| |
• | Costs and liabilities associated with complying with new and ever-evolving credit card association security initiatives and regulations; |
| |
• | The effects of, and changes in, laws, regulations, and other activities of governments, agencies and similar organizations, in particular insofar as legislative changes can affect local operations, service obligations, and the features that may have to be incorporated into our software and other products; |
| |
• | Managing expenses, including those over which we exercise little or no control, such as health care costs and compliance with new legislation; |
| |
• | Unanticipated taxation issues, including the imposition of tariffs by the WTO and other governing bodies in an effort to deter or penalize U.S. imports. |
Finally, there are ongoing legal risks to which we are subject, some of which are difficult to predict, expect or assess. Two such legal risks are as follows:
| 1. Alleged Patent Infringement: On occasion, we will receive unsolicited letters from entities offering a license to patents; some of these letters will suggest or assert that we are or may be infringing the patent. In those instances, we will assess the validity of the claims and the purported patent, and determine whether a license is appropriate or necessary. If we conclude that a license is not necessary, there is a risk that we could be subject to legal action. Currently, there is no such pending legal action. Additionally, we face the risk of indirect liability as a result of infringement claims brought against our customers. For example, hundreds of merchants throughout the country, some of which license software products from MICROS and Datavantage, recently have received patent licensing letters from an alleged patent holder in connection with credit card transaction processes. The alleged patent holder has pursued litigation against several of these merchants, one of which, to our knowledge, is a customer of ours. While we strongly believe that our technology does not infringe the purported patents, and that there may be other defenses available to those claims, there can be no guarantees that we will not become involved in these or other infringement claim matters, and we could as a result incur both legal expenses and damages. |
| |
| 2. Credit Card Compliance. Credit card issuers have promulgated credit card security guidelines as part of their ongoing effort to battle identity theft and credit card fraud. We continue to work with credit card issuers to assure that our products comply with these rules. There can be no assurances, however, that our products are invulnerable to unauthorized access or hacking. Additionally, there can be no guarantee that our customers will implement all of the credit card security features that we introduce, or the procedures required by the credit card issuers, or that our customer maintains appropriate levels of firewall protection and other security measures. When there is unauthorized access to credit card data that results in financial loss, there is the potential that parties could seek damages from us. Currently, there is no litigation in which damages have been sought from us in connection with credit card fraud. |
31
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
| | Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | | | | |
| |
| | | | |
| | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Period(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1st Quarter (Jul-Sep 2005) | | | 567,710 | | $ | 42.74 | | | 567,710 | | | 935,628 | |
2nd Quarter (Oct-Dec 2005) | | | 44,060 | | $ | 43.81 | | | 44,060 | | | 891,568 | |
3rd Quarter: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 2006 | | | 97,500 | | $ | 47.99 | | | 97,500 | | | 794,068 | |
February 2006 | | | 186,400 | | $ | 44.30 | | | 186,400 | | | 607,668 | |
March 2006 | | | 25,000 | | $ | 42.55 | | | 25,000 | | | 582,668 | |
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
3rd Quarter (Jan-Mar 2006) | | | 308,900 | | $ | 45.31 | | | 308,900 | | | 582,668 | |
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Fiscal Year-to-Date Total | | | 920,670 | | $ | 43.67 | | | 920,670 | | | 582,668 | |
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| (1) | On November 23, 2004, the Company announced that the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to two million shares of the Company’s common stock on the open market. All purchases during the periods presented in the table above were made under this authorized plan. As of March 31, 2006, the Company has purchased an aggregate of 1.4 million shares in the open market under this authorized plan from the date the plan was authorized. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company entered into a third amendment to its lease for its headquarters facility in Columbia, Maryland, pursuant to which the term of the lease was extended to February 28, 2016.
Item 6. Exhibits
10 | | Third Amendment to Lease Agreement |
| | |
31(i).1 | | Certification by CEO pursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31(i).2 | | Certification by CFO pursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification by CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification by CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| MICROS SYSTEMS, INC. |
|
|
| (Registrant) |
| |
| |
Date: May 10, 2006 | /s/ Gary C. Kaufman |
|
|
| Gary C. Kaufman |
| Executive Vice President, |
| Finance and Administration/ |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| |
| |
Date: May 10, 2006 | /s/ Cynthia A. Russo |
|
|
| Cynthia A. Russo |
| Vice President and Corporate Controller |
33