PART I.
This financial information reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL INFORMATION
FHN is a national financial services institution. From a small community bank chartered in 1864, FHN has grown to be one of the top 35 largest bank holding companies in the United States in terms of asset size and market capitalization.
Approximately 13,000 employees provide a broad array of financial services to individual and business customers through hundreds of offices located in 48 states.
FHN companies have been recognized as some of the nation's best employers by AARP, Working Mother and Fortune magazine. FHN also was named one of the nation's 100 best corporate citizens by Business Ethics magazine.
FHN provides a broad array of financial services to its customers through three national businesses. The combined strengths of our businesses create an extensive range of financial products and services. In addition, the corporate segment provides essential support within the corporation.
- Retail/Commercial Banking offers financial products and services, including traditional lending and deposit-taking, to retail and commercial customers. Additionally, the retail/commercial bank provides investments, insurance, financial planning, trust services and asset management, credit card, cash management, merchant services, check clearing, and correspondent services.
- Mortgage Banking helps provide home ownership through First Horizon Home Loans, which operates offices in more than 40 states and is one of the top 15 mortgage servicers and top 20 originators of mortgage loans to consumers. This segment consists of core mortgage banking elements including originations and servicing and the associated ancillary revenues related to these businesses.
- Capital Markets provides a broad spectrum of financial services for the investment and banking communities through the integration of capital markets securities activities, equity research and investment banking.
- Corporate consists of unallocated corporate expenses, expense on subordinated debt issuances and preferred stock, bank-owned life insurance, unallocated interest income associated with excess equity, net impact of raising incremental capital, funds management and venture capital.
For the purpose of this management discussion and analysis (MD&A), earning assets have been expressed as averages, and loans have been disclosed net of unearned income. The following is a discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of FHN for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005, compared to the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004. To assist the reader in obtaining a better understanding of FHN and its performance, this discussion should be read in conjunction with FHN's unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements and accompanying notes appearing in this report. Additional information including the 2004 financial statements, notes, and management's discussion and analysis is p rovided in the 2004 Annual Report.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Management's discussion and analysis may contain forward-looking statements with respect to FHN's beliefs, plans, goals, expectations, and estimates. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not a representation of historical information but rather are related to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. The words "believe", "expect" , "anticipate", "intend", "estimate", "should", "is likely", "will", "going forward", and other expressions that indicate future events and trends identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, operational, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond a company's control, and many of which, with respect to future business decisions and actions (including acquisitions and divestitures), are subject to change. Examples of uncertainties and contingencies include, among other important factors, general and local economic and business conditions; expectations of and actual timing and amount of interest rate movements, including the slope of the yield curve (which can have a significant impact on a financial services institution); market and monetary fluctua tions; inflation or deflation; investor responses to these conditions; the financial condition of borrowers and other counterparties; competition within and outside the financial services industry; geopolitical developments including possible terrorist activity; effectiveness of FHN's hedging practices; technology; demand for FHN's product offerings; new products and services in the industries in which FHN operates and critical accounting estimates. Other factors are those inherent in originating and servicing loans including prepayment risks, pricing concessions, fluctuation in U.S. housing prices, fluctuation of collateral values, and changes in customer profiles. Additionally, the actions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Financial Accounting
24
Standards Board (FASB), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and other regulators; regulatory and judicial proceedings and changes in laws and regulations applicable to FHN; and FHN's success in executing its business plans and strategies and managing the risks involved in the foregoing, could cause actual results to differ. FHN assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements that are made from time to time. Actual results could differ because of several factors, including those presented in the Forward-Looking Statements section of the MD&A discussion.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY (Comparison of Second Quarter 2005 to Second Quarter 2004)
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Earnings for second quarter 2005 were $102.7 million, or $.80 diluted earnings per share compared to earnings of $118.4 million, or $.92 diluted earnings per share for second quarter 2004.
Earnings this quarter were led by the performance of Retail/Commercial Banking, as pre-tax income increased 17 percent to $115.7 million, or 77 percent of our pre-tax income. This growth reflects the execution of national expansion initiatives which continue to leverage cross-sell opportunities in markets where FHN has a substantial mortgage presence and expansion of the sales force. The success of these initiatives can be seen through loan growth of 20 percent and total deposit growth of 12 percent compared to second quarter 2004. Asset quality also remained positive with a net charge off ratio of 23 basis points compared to 30 basis points last year.
Mortgage Banking experienced declines in profitability due to the impact of fluctuations in refinance activity resulting from the amount and timing of interest rate changes. The decline in mortgage interest rates at quarter end resulted in increased mortgage servicing rights (MSR) impairment due to higher anticipated and actual prepayments. Second quarter 2005 also reflected strong origination performance in the latter part of the quarter, which is demonstrated by an increase of $.8 billion in the mortgage warehouse and $1.6 billion in the mortgage pipeline. Net interest income decreased 15 percent as the flattening of the yield curve resulted in compression of the spread on the warehouse. An expanded sales forc e contributed to a 28 percent increase in home purchase-related originations compared to second quarter 2004.
Capital Markets revenues were negatively impacted as fixed income product revenues declined and the flattening of the yield curve resulted in compression of the spread on capital markets securities inventory. Revenue from other fee sources increased 10 percent from second quarter 2004, primarily due to increased fees from loan sales.
Return on average shareholders' equity and return on average assets were 19.6 percent and 1.14 percent, respectively, for second quarter 2005 compared to 25.5 percent and 1.75 percent for second quarter 2004. Total assets were $36.3 billion and shareholders' equity was $2.1 billion for second quarter 2005 compared to $27.3 billion and $1.9 billion for second quarter 2004. The increase in total assets was impacted by $3.7 billion growth in Capital Markets' balance sheet, primarily due to the acquisition of the fixed income business of Spear, Leeds and Kellogg (SLK) in first quarter 2005 and by $4.3 billion growth in Retail/Commercial Banking's balance sheet primarily due to loan growth.
BUSINESS LINE REVIEW
Retail/Commercial Banking
Pre-tax income for Retail/Commercial Banking increased 17 percent to $115.7 million for second quarter 2005, compared to $99.3 million for second quarter 2004. Retail/Commercial Banking contributed 77 percent of total pre-tax income in second quarter 2005 compared to 59 percent in second quarter 2004. Total revenues increased 16 percent to $334.5 million for second quarter 2005 compared to $288.7 million for second quarter 2004.
Net interest income increased 26 percent to $211.4 million in second quarter 2005 from $167.3 million in second quarter 2004. The increase in 2005's net interest income is primarily attributable to 20 percent total loan growth with commercial loans growing 31 percent to $8.5 billion from $6.5 billion and retail loans growing 11 percent to $9.3 billion from $8.3 billion. This growth resulted from expansion of the sales force which increased market share in the core bank, as well as cross-sell opportunities in FHN's national markets where we have a substantial mortgage presence. Total deposits increased 12 percent or $1.1 billion over second quarter 2004. Retail/Commercial Banking's net interest margin for second quarter 2005 was held stable compared to second quarter 2004 by minimizing loan rate spread compression caused by competitive pricing while successfully increasing spreads on deposits in conjunction with fed rate increases.
25
Noninterest income remained relatively flat at $123.1 million in second quarter 2005 compared to $121.4 million in second quarter 2004. Second quarter 2005 noninterest income included $8.4 million net revenue from sales and securitizations of real estate residential loans. This was reduced by $5.2 million resulting from a write-off of the net capitalized expenses on HELOC held for sale that prepaid faster than anticipated. In second quarter 2004, noninterest income included revenue from loan sales and securitizations of $4.0 million. Merchant processing income increased 20 percent in second quarter 2005, or $3.8 million, reflecting increased volume from existing customers as well as an expanded customer base.
The provision for loan losses increased to $15.6 million in second quarter 2005 from $12.3 million last year as the loan portfolio has grown by 20 percent since second quarter 2004. During this time net charge-offs decreased to $10.3 million from $11.0 million. However, the ratio of allowance to total loans continued to decline as the risk profile of both the retail and commercial loan portfolios improved. The risk profile of the retail loan portfolio improved as the mix shifted to a greater concentration of high credit score products. The risk profile of the commercial loan portfolio improved as indicated by current lower levels of total watch and classified loans.
Noninterest expense was $203.2 million in second quarter 2005 compared to $177.1 million last year. The growth in noninterest expense was due to higher personnel and advertising costs which were largely attributable to national expansion initiatives. As total revenue grew 16 percent and noninterest expense grew 15 percent, the efficiency ratio improved to 60.7 percent in second quarter 2005 from 61.4 percent in second quarter 2004.
Mortgage Banking
Pre-tax income for Mortgage Banking decreased 22 percent to $38.0 million for second quarter 2005, compared to $48.8 million for second quarter 2004. Total revenues were $155.4 million in second quarter 2005, a decrease of 7 percent from $167.5 million in second quarter 2004.
Net interest income decreased 15 percent to $37.7 million in second quarter 2005 from $44.4 million in second quarter 2004 as the flattening of the yield curve resulted in compression of the spread on the warehouse. Spread on the warehouse was 2.66 percent in second quarter 2005 compared to 3.84 percent for the same period in 2004.
Noninterest income decreased 4 percent to $117.7 million in second quarter 2005 compared to $123.1 million in second quarter 2004. Noninterest income consists primarily of mortgage banking-related revenue, net of costs, from the origination and sale of mortgage loans, fees from mortgage servicing and MSR net hedge gains or losses. Mortgage servicing noninterest income is net of amortization, impairment and other expenses related to MSR and related hedges.
Mortgage loan origination volumes in second quarter 2005 were $9.5 billion compared to $8.9 billion in 2004 driven by an increase in home purchase related originations, which grew 28 percent from second quarter 2004. This increase reflects FHN's execution of its strategy to grow the purchase market and was the result of an expanded sales force which increased 20 percent and includes almost 2,000 relationship managers on June 30, 2005. Refinance activity represented 37 percent of total originations during second quarter 2005 compared to 47 percent last year. Loans delivered into the secondary market decreased 8 percent to $8.7 billion. Net r evenue from mortgage loans sold decreased 3 percent to $95.6 million from $99.1 million in second quarter 2004. Reflecting strong origination performance in the latter part of the quarter the warehouse and pipeline of mortgage products increased $.8 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively over second quarter 2004.
The mortgage-servicing portfolio grew 26 percent to $90.8 billion on June 30, 2005, from $72.2 billion on June 30, 2004, including approximately $11 billion of loans for which the servicing rights were acquired in 2004. Total fees associated with mortgage servicing increased 28 percent to $68.4 million reflecting this growth. In addition, the growth in the servicing portfolio led to an 18 percent increase in capitalized mortgage servicing rights and contributed to an 18 percent, or $6.8 million, increase in amortization expense compared to second quarter 2004. The total $8.1 million decrease in net servicing revenues consists of these and several other factors, including an unfavorable $23.9 million impact from MSR impairment charges. This unfavorable variance is primarily a result of a $15.4 million reduction in impairment in second quarter 2004 resulting from the restratification of the servicing portfolio tranches due to the impact that rising interest rates had on the predominant risk characteristics of the MSR portfolio at that time. In addition, net servicing revenues were impacted by an increase of $7.8 million in net hedge gains.
Noninterest expense remained stable at $117.2 million in second quarter 2005 compared to $118.7 million in second quarter 2004 as expense efficiencies were offset by the increased production.
Capital Markets
Pre-tax earnings declined from $25.0 million in second quarter 2004 to $6.9 million in second quarter 2005 due to a reduction in fixed income securities sales to depository customers, net of a related decline in commissions and incentives, and a decrease in net interest income.
26
Significant uncertainties within the investment community regarding interest rates and other economic factors continue to cause fixed income investors to reduce their purchases. Total revenues were $89.6 million in second quarter 2005, a decrease of 13 percent from $103.0 million in second quarter 2004.
Revenues from fixed income sales to depository investors fell $12.4 million while non-depository revenues increased $5.0 million or 21 percent. Non-depository revenues increased to 29 percent of total noninterest income in second quarter 2005 from 23 percent in second quarter 2004, primarily as a result of the acquisition of the fixed income business of SLK in first quarter 2005. Revenues from other fee sources include fee income from activities such as loan sales, investment banking, equity research, portfolio advisory and the sale of bank-owned life insurance. Revenue from other fee sources represented 49 percent of total segment basis noninterest income in second quarter 2005 compared to 43 percent in second quarter 2004 and incr eased 10 percent to $49.5 million from $44.8 million, primarily due to increased fees from loan sales.
Net interest income decreased $10.7 million primarily due to the flattening of the yield curve, resulting in compression of the spread on capital markets securities inventory, and due to an incremental equity charge of $4.6 million related to the capital requirements of the SLK acquisition.
Noninterest expense increased 6 percent or $4.7 million, primarily due to increased costs resulting from the acquisition of SLK.
Corporate
The Corporate segment's results yielded a pre-tax loss of $10.5 million in second quarter 2005 compared to a pre-tax loss of $3.5 million in second quarter 2004. The second quarter 2005 results include $3.6 million dividend expense on $300 million of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock issued by First Tennessee Bank National Association in first quarter 2005, while the second quarter 2004 results include $2.9 million in security gains due to portfolio restructurings and venture capital gains.
INCOME STATEMENT REVIEW
Total revenues (net interest income and noninterest income) were $585.0 million, an increase of 3 percent from $565.9 million in 2004. Noninterest income provides the majority of FHN's revenue and contributed 59 percent to total revenue in second quarter 2005 compared to 62 percent in second quarter 2004. Second quarter 2005 noninterest income declined 3 percent to $343.4 million from $352.3 million in 2004. A more detailed discussion of the major line items follows.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income increased 13 percent to $241.6 million from $213.6 million as earning assets grew 34 percent to $31.6 billion and interest-bearing liabilities grew 41 percent to $27.2 billion in second quarter 2005.
The activity levels and related funding for FHN's mortgage production and servicing and capital markets activities affect the net interest margin. These activities typically produce different margins than traditional banking activities. Mortgage production and servicing activities can affect the overall margin based on a number of factors, including the size of the mortgage warehouse, the time it takes to deliver loans into the secondary market, the amount of custodial balances, and the level of MSR. Capital markets activities tend to compress the margin because of its strategy to reduce market risk by hedging its inventory in the cash markets, which reduces the term and accordingly the interest income earned on these transactions. As a result of these impacts, FHN's consolidated margin cannot be readily compared to that of other bank holding com panies.
The consolidated net interest margin was 3.06 percent for second quarter 2005 compared to 3.63 percent for second quarter 2004. This compression in the margin occurred as the spread decreased to 2.66 percent from 3.38 percent in 2004. The acquisition of SLK in first quarter 2005 increased the negative pressure on the corporate margin from Capital Markets' activities as this segment's balance sheet grew $3.7 billion. In addition, Mortgage Banking negatively impacted the margin this quarter as the spread on the warehouse decreased 118 basis points to 2.66 percent, and the warehouse grew 6 percent from second quarter 2004.
27
Table 1 - Net Interest Margin | | | | | Second Quarter |
| | | | | | | June 30 |
| | | | | | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Consolidated Yields and Rates: | | | | | | |
Investment securities | | | | | | 4.33% | | 4.30% |
Loans, net of unearned | | | | | | 5.98 | | 4.81 |
Loans held for sale | | | | | | 6.20 | | 5.13 |
Capital markets securities inventory | | | | 4.39 | | 3.82 |
Mortgage banking trading securities | | | | 12.63 | | 11.93 |
Other earning assets | | | | | | 2.61 | | .67 |
Yields on earning assets | | | | | 5.56 | | 4.72 |
Interest-bearing core deposits | | | | | 1.92 | | 1.28 |
CD's over $100,000 | | | | | | 3.06 | | 1.21 |
Fed funds purchased and repos | | | | 2.71 | | .90 |
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings | | | 3.18 | | 2.07 |
Capital markets trading liabilities | | | | 5.20 | | 3.96 |
Term borrowings | | | | | | 3.71 | | 1.87 |
Rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities | | | | 2.90 | | 1.34 |
Net interest spread | | | | | | 2.66 | | 3.38 |
Effect of interest-free sources | | | | | .40 | | .25 |
FHN - NIM | | | | | | | 3.06% | | 3.63% |
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation. |
In the near-term, a modest compression of the net interest margin is expected as an increase in short-term rates will negatively impact the spread on the mortgage warehouse. Over the long-term, FHN's strategies to manage the interest rate sensitivity of the balance sheet position are designed to allow the net interest margin to improve in a higher interest rate environment. Flattening in the spread between short-term and long-term interest rates should have an unfavorable impact on net interest margin in general, primarily from narrower spreads on the mortgage warehouse and capital markets inventories.
NONINTEREST INCOME
Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income
First Horizon Home Loans, an indirect subsidiary of FHN, offers residential mortgage banking products and services to customers, which consist primarily of the origination or purchase of single-family residential mortgage loans. First Horizon Home Loans originates mortgage loans through its retail and wholesale operations and also purchases mortgage loans from third-party mortgage bankers (correspondent brokers) for sale to secondary market investors and subsequently services the majority of those loans.
Origination income includes origination fees, net of costs, gains/(losses) recognized on loans sold including the capitalized net present value of MSR, and the value recognized on loans in process. Origination fees, net of costs (including incentives and other direct costs), are deferred and included in the basis of the loans in calculating gains and losses upon sale. Gains or losses from the sale of loans are recognized at the time a mortgage loan is sold into the secondary market. A portion of the gain or loss is recognized at the time an interest rate lock commitment is made to the customer. In second quarter 2004 FHN adopted SAB No. 105, which prohibits the inclusion of estimated servicing cash flows within the valuation of interest rate lock commitments under SFAS No. 133. FHN previously included a portion of the value of the associated servicing cash flows when recognizing loan commitments at inception and throughout its life. Second quarter 2004 earnings included the adoption of SAB No. 105 which created an accounting change and lowered earnings by $8.4 million and diluted earnings per share by $0.04. While this impact was a one-time change and doesn't affect the ongoing economic value of the business, it can create quarterly volatility due to the timing of revenue recognition as experienced in second quarter 2005.
Servicing income includes servicing fees, MSR net hedge gains/(losses), which reflect the effects of hedging MSR including servicing rights net value changes, amortization and impairment of MSR, and gains/(losses) related to market value adjustments on retained interests classified as mortgage trading securities, primarily interest-only strips, and associated hedges. First Horizon Home Loans employs hedging strategies intended to counter changes in the value of MSR and other retained interests due to changing interest rate environments (refer to discussion of MSR under Critical Accounting Policies). Other income includes revenue from the GNMA repurchase program and other miscellaneous items.
28
Mortgage loan origination volumes in second quarter 2005 were $9.5 billion compared to $8.9 billion in 2004 driven by an increase in home purchase related originations, which grew 28 percent from second quarter 2004. This increase demonstrates FHN' s success in executing its strategy to grow the purchase market and was the result of an expanded sales force which increased 20 percent and included almost 2,000 relationship managers on June 30, 2005. Refinance activity represented 37 percent of total originations during second quarter 2005 compared to 47 percent last year. Loans delivered into the secondary market decreased 8 percent to $8.7 billion. Net revenue from mortgage loans sold decreased 3 percent to $95.6 million compared to $99.1 million in second quarter 2004.
The mortgage-servicing portfolio grew 26 percent to $90.8 billion on June 30, 2005, from $72.2 billion on June 30, 2004, including approximately $11 billion of loans for which the servicing rights were acquired in 2004. Total fees associated with mortgage servicing increased 28 percent to $68.4 million reflecting this growth. In addition, the growth in the servicing portfolio led to an 18 percent increase in capitalized MSR and contributed to an 18 percent, or $6.8 million, increase in amortization expense compared to second quarter 2004. In total, the $8.1 million decrease in net servicing revenues consists of these and several other factors, including an unfavorable $23.9 million impact from MSR impairment charges. This unfavorable variance is primarily a result of a $15.4 million reduction in impairment in second quarter 2004 resulting from the restratification of the servicing portfolio tranches due to the impact rising interest rates had on the predominant risk characteristics of the MSR portfolio at that time. In addition, net servicing revenues were impacted by an increase of $7.8 million in net hedge gains.
Table 2 - Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Three Months Ended | Percent | Six Months Ended | Percent |
| | | | June 30 | Change | June 30 | Change |
(Dollars and volumes in millions) | | | | | 2005 | 2004 | (%) | 2005 | 2004 | (%) |
Noninterest income: | | | | | | | | | | |
Origination income | | | | | $ 95.6 | $ 99.1 | 3.5 - | $ 195.6 | $ 194.9 | .4 + |
Servicing income | | | | | 6.3 | 14.4 | 56.3 - | 20.1 | 42.8 | 53.2 - |
Other | | | | | 7.1 | 4.8 | 47.6 + | 12.1 | 7.1 | 70.4 + |
Total mortgage banking noninterest income | | | | | $ 109.0 | $ 118.3 | 7.8 - | $ 227.8 | $ 244.8 | 7.0 - |
Refinance originations - first lien | | | | | $ 3,545.4 | $ 4,226.0 | 16.1 - | $ 7,133.1 | $ 8,200.5 | 13.0 - |
New loan originations - first lien | | | | | 5,980.4 | 4,688.6 | 27.6 + | 10,011.0 | 7,583.2 | 32.0 + |
Mortgage loan originations | | | | | $ 9,525.8 | $ 8,914.6 | 6.9 + | $ 17,144.1 | $ 15,783.7 | 8.6 + |
Servicing portfolio | | | | | $ 90,822.9 | $ 72,165.4 | 25.9 + | $ 90,822.9 | $ 72,165.4 | 25.9 + |
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation. |
Capital Markets Noninterest Income
Capital markets noninterest income, the major component of revenue in the Capital Markets segment, is primarily generated from the purchase and sale of securities as both principal and agent, and from investment banking, loans sales, portfolio advisory and equity research activities. Inventory positions are limited to the procurement of securities solely for distribution to customers by the sales staff. Inventory is hedged to protect against movements in fair value due to changes in interest rates.
Revenues from fixed income sales to depository investors fell $12.4 million while non-depository revenues increased $5.0 million or 21 percent. Non-depository revenues increased to 30 percent of total noninterest income in second quarter 2005 from 23 percent in second quarter 2004, primarily as a result of the acquisition of the fixed income business of SLK in first quarter 2005. Revenue from other fee sources represented 46 percent of total noninterest income in second quarter 2005 compared to 43 percent in second quarter 2004.
29
Table 3 - Capital Markets Noninterest Income | | | | | | |
| | | | | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended | |
| | | | | June 30 | Growth | June 30 | Growth |
(Dollars in millions) | | | | | 2005 | 2004 | Rate (%) | 2005 | 2004 | Rate (%) |
Noninterest income: | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed income - depository | | | | | $ 22.3 | $ 34.7 | 35.7 - | $ 50.1 | $ 83.9 | 40.3 - |
Fixed income - non-depository | | | | | 28.5 | 23.5 | 21.3 + | 63.7 | 56.3 | 13.1 + |
Other products and services | | | | | 44.0 | 44.0 | - | 76.2 | 79.9 | 4.6 - |
Total capital markets noninterest income | | | | $ 94.8 | $ 102.2 | 7.2 - | $ 190.0 | $ 220.1 | 13.7 - |
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation. |
Other Noninterest Income
All other noninterest income categories grew 6 percent, or $7.8 million. Second quarter 2005 noninterest income included $10.3 million net revenue from sales and securitizations of real estate residential loans, which impacted both Capital Markets and Retail/Commercial Banking segment revenues. This was reduced by $5.2 million resulting from a write-off of the net capitalized expenses on HELOC held for sale that prepaid faster than anticipated. In second quarter 2004, noninterest income included revenue from loan sales and securitizations of $4.0 million. Merchant processing income increased 20 percent in second quarter 2005, or $3.8 million, reflecting increased volume from existing customers as well as an expanded customer base.
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Total noninterest expense for second quarter 2005 increased 9 percent to $419.1 million from $384.0 million in 2004. Employee compensation, incentives and benefits (personnel expense), the largest component of noninterest expense, increased 4 percent to $248.0 million from $238.4 million in 2004 primarily due to national expansion initiatives. All other noninterest expense increased 17 percent, or $25.5 million, which included growth in occupancy expense, operations services, contract employment, dividends on FTBNA perpetual preferred stock, and advertising expense. These increases primarily resulted from activity associated with national expansion strategies and other growth initiatives.
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES / ASSET QUALITY
The provision for loan losses is the charge to earnings that management determines to be necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an adequate level reflecting management's estimate of probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. An analytical model based on historical loss experience adjusted for current events, trends and economic conditions is used by management to determine the amount of provision to be recognized and to assess the adequacy of the loan loss allowance. The provision for loan losses increased 28 percent in 2005 to $15.8 million from $12.3 million in 2004 as the loan portfolio has grown 20 percent since second quarter 2004. During this time the net charge-off ratio was 23 basis points in second quarter 2005 compared to 30 basis poin ts in second quarter 2004 as net charge-offs decreased to $10.3 million from $11.0 million. Net charge-offs were impacted in second quarter 2005 by improvement in the consumer loan portfolios. The risk profile of the retail portfolio improved as the mix shifted to a greater concentration of high credit score products. The risk profile of the commercial loan portfolio improved as indicated by current lower levels of total watch list and classified loans.
Nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio were $39.8 million on June 30, 2005, compared to $45.7 million on June 30, 2004. The ratio of nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio to total loans was .22 percent on June 30, 2005, compared to .30 percent on June 30, 2004, reflecting the underlying stability of the loan portfolio. Nonperforming assets of $77.5 million on June 30, 2005, decreased $12.5 million from $90.0 million on June 30, 2004. This decrease reflects a decline in nonperforming loans and foreclosed real estate in the retail/commercial bank.
30
Table 4 - Asset Quality Information | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Second Quarter |
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | |
Beginning balance on March 31 | | | $ 164,195 | | $ 160,685 |
Provision for loan losses | | | | 15,786 | | 12,292 |
Transfers to held for sale | | | | - | | (1,239) |
Charge-offs | | | | | | (13,642) | | (14,305) |
Recoveries | | | | | | 3,358 | | 3,324 |
Ending balance on June 30 | | | 169,697 | | 160,757 |
Reserve for off-balance sheet commitments | | | 8,515 | | 7,883 |
Total allowance for loan losses and reserve for off-balance sheet commitments | $ 178,212 | | $ 168,640 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | June 30 |
| | | | | | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Retail/Commercial Banking: | | | | | |
Nonperforming loans | | | | $ 39,792 | | $ 45,671 |
Foreclosed real estate | | | | 18,647 | | 23,987 |
Total Retail/Commercial Banking | | | 58,439 | | 69,658 |
Mortgage Banking: | | | | | | | |
Nonperforming loans - held for sale | | | 10,550 | | 11,118 |
Foreclosed real estate | | | | 8,490 | | 9,263 |
Total Mortgage Banking | | | | 19,040 | | 20,381 |
Total nonperforming assets | | | $ 77,479 | | $ 90,039 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total loans, net of unearned income | | | $ 18,428,601 | | $ 15,301,467 |
Insured loans | | | | | | (830,714) | | (619,836) |
Loans excluding insured loans | | | $ 17,597,887 | | $ 14,681,631 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loans 30 to 89 days past due | | | $ 79,854 | | $ 69,580 |
Loans 30 to 89 days past due - guaranteed* | | | 1,883 | | 2,261 |
Loans 90 days past due | | | 29,332 | | 25,418 |
Loans 90 days past due - guaranteed* | | | 5,458 | | 5,759 |
Potential problem assets** | | | 115,984 | | 99,355 |
Loans held for sale 30 to 89 days past due | | 40,462 | | 48,226 |
Loans held for sale 30 to 89 days past due - guaranteed* | | 29,558 | | 40,926 |
Loans held for sale 90 days past due | | | 162,126 | | 177,399 |
Loans held for sale 90 days past due - guaranteed* | | 159,758 | | 176,651 |
Off-balance sheet commitments*** | | | 6,870,692 | | 5,607,462 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | June 30 |
| | | | | | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Allowance to total loans | | | | .92% | | 1.05% |
Allowance to loans excluding insured loans | | | .96 | | 1.10 |
Allowance to nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio | | 426 | | 352 |
Nonperforming assets to loans, foreclosed real estate | | | | |
and other assets (Retail/Commercial Banking) | | | .32 | | .45 |
Nonperforming assets to unpaid principal balance of | | | | |
servicing portfolio (Mortgage Banking) | | | .02 | | .03 |
Allowance to annualized net charge-offs | | 4.13x | | 3.66x |
* Guaranteed loans include FHA, VA, student and GNMA loans repurchased through the GNMA repurchase program. ** Includes loans 90 days past due. *** Amount of off-balance sheet commitments for which a reserve has been provided. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation. |
31
Table 5 - Net Charge-off Ratios * | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Three Months Ended |
| | | | | | | June 30 |
| | | | | | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Commercial | | | | | | | .20% | | .19% |
Retail real estate | | | | | | .16 | | .21 |
Other retail | | | | | | | .66 | | 1.12 |
Credit card receivables | | | | | | 3.94 | | 4.99 |
Total net charge-offs | | | | | | .23 | | .30 |
| | | | | | | | | |
* Table 6 provides information on the relative size of each loan portfolio. |
Going forward the level of provision for loan losses should fluctuate primarily with the strength or weakness of the economies of the markets where FHN does business over the long-run and will experience quarterly fluctuations depending on the type and quantity of loan growth and impacts from quarterly asset quality movements. Additionally, asset quality in general should remain relatively stable based on expected economic conditions with normal quarterly fluctuations around recent levels; however, levels for the first half of 2005 were relatively strong.
STATEMENT OF CONDITION REVIEW
EARNING ASSETS
During second quarter 2005, earning assets consisted of loans, loans held for sale, investment securities, trading securities and other earning assets. Earning assets grew 34 percent and averaged $31.6 billion in second quarter 2005 compared to $23.6 billion in 2004. The increase in earning assets was primarily due to loan growth of 20 percent, 29 percent growth in loans held for sale, 162 percent growth in trading securities, and 228 percent growth in other earning assets.
LOANS
Average total loans increased 20 percent for second quarter 2005 to $17.8 billion from $14.8 billion in 2004. Average loans represented 56 percent of average earning assets in second quarter 2005 and 63 percent in 2004.
Commercial, financial and industrial loans increased 24 percent, or $1.2 billion, since second quarter 2004 reflecting greater demand for loans as the economy improved and increased market share in Tennessee. Commercial construction loans grew 94 percent since second quarter 2004 or $749.6 million, primarily from growth in loans to single-family residential builders made through First Horizon Home Loans, reflecting the demand for single-family housing and expansion of the sales force and geographic reach. The retail real estate construction portfolio increased 113 percent or $702.1 million since second quarter 2004. Retail real estate construction loans are made to individuals for the purpose of constructing a home where FHN is committed to make the permanent mortga ge. The increase in these loans reflects the favorable housing environment and expansion of the sales force and geographic reach. Residential real estate loans grew 4 percent or $279.8 million since second quarter 2004, due to growth in HELOC (see also Loans Held for Sale below). The growth in HELOC reflects progress in national expansion plans which have benefited from efforts to incorporate cross-sell initiatives into the origination process. Additional loan information is provided in Table 6 - Average Loans.
FHN has a significant concentration in loans secured by real estate which is geographically diversified nationwide. In 2005 and 2004, 65 percent of total loans are secured by real estate (see Table 6). Three lending products have contributed to this increased level of real estate lending - (1) significant growth in real estate residential loans identified as HELOC which grew 13 percent; (2) commercial construction lending which grew 94 percent led by growth in loans to single-family builders; and (3) retail real estate construction which grew 113 percent. FHN's commercial real estate lending is well-diversified by product type and industry. On June 30, 2005, FHN did not have any concentrations of 10 percent or m ore of total commercial, financial and industrial loans in any single industry.
32
Table 6 - Average Loans | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30 |
| | | Percent | Growth | | | Percent |
(Dollars in millions) | | 2005 | of Total | Rate | | 2004 | of Total |
Commercial: | | | | | | | |
Commercial, financial and industrial | | $ 5,894.5 | 33% | 24.4 % | | $ 4,736.6 | 32% |
Real estate commercial | | 1,086.3 | 6 | 12.6 | | 965.1 | 7 |
Real estate construction | | 1,546.2 | 9 | 94.1 | | 796.6 | 5 |
Total commercial | | 8,527.0 | 48 | 31.2 | | 6,498.3 | 44 |
Retail: | | | | | | | |
Real estate residential | | 7,533.5 | 42 | 3.9 | | 7,253.7 | 49 |
Real estate construction | | 1,321.2 | 8 | 113.4 | | 619.1 | 4 |
Other retail | | 161.1 | 1 | (14.6) | | 188.7 | 1 |
Credit card receivables | | 239.5 | 1 | (7.3) | | 258.4 | 2 |
Total retail | | 9,255.3 | 52 | 11.2 | | 8,319.9 | 56 |
Total loans, net of unearned | | $ 17,782.3 | 100% | 20.0 % | | $ 14,818.2 | 100% |
Commercial loan growth should be strong as a result of our national expansion of single-family residential construction lending and greater market demand for commercial and industrial loans. Year-over-year growth in retail loans will be primarily driven by leveraging our national sales platform.
LOANS HELD FOR SALE
Loans held for sale, consisting primarily of mortgage-related loans including first- and second-lien mortgages and HELOC, increased 29 percent to $6.1 billion in 2005 from $4.7 billion in 2004. This growth is primarily related to higher levels of HELOC and second-lien mortgages held for sale and securitization as FHN continues to fund loan growth and maintain a stable liquidity position through whole-loan sales or securitizations. In addition, mortgage warehouse loans increased due to the higher level of originations in 2005.
TRADING SECURITIES / OTHER EARNING ASSETS
Trading securities increased 162 percent to $2.4 billion in 2005 from $.9 billion in 2004. Other earning assets increased 228 percent to $2.5 billion in 2005 from $.8 billion in 2004. These increases were primarily attributable to the acquisition of SLK.
DEPOSITS / OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDS
Core deposits increased 10 percent to $12.0 billion in second quarter 2005 compared to $10.9 billion in 2004, primarily due to expansion strategies which emphasize a focus on convenient hours, free checking and targeted financial center expansion. Short-term purchased funds averaged $17.8 billion for second quarter 2005, up 65 percent or $7.0 billion from second quarter 2004. In second quarter 2005, short-term purchased funds accounted for 55 percent of FHN's total funding, which is comprised of core deposits, purchased funds (including federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, trading liabilities and short-term borrowings) and term borrowings, and accounted for 45 percent of total funding in second quarter 2004. Term borrowings include senior and subordinated borrowings and advances with original maturities greater than one year. Term borrowings averaged $2.6 billion in second quarter 2005, an increase of 6 percent from $2.4 billion in second quarter 2004.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY (Comparison of first six months of 2005 to first six months of 2004)
For the first six months of 2005, earnings totaled $211.9 million or $1.65 diluted earnings per share. For the same period in 2004, earnings were $237.7 million or $1.84 diluted earnings per share. Return on average shareholders' equity was 20.7 percent and return on average assets was 1.21 percent for the first six months of 2005 compared to 25.5 percent and 1.83 percent, respectively, for the first six months of 2004.
33
For the first six months of 2005, total revenues were $1,155.8 million, an increase of 2 percent from $1,132.0 million in 2004. Noninterest income decreased 5 percent to $686.8 million from $722.4 million in 2004. Noninterest expense increased 8 percent to $813.9 million for the six-month period in 2005 compared to $756.0 million in 2004. |
INCOME STATEMENT REVIEW
Noninterest income for the first six months of 2005 was $686.8 million and contributed 59 percent to total revenues as compared to $722.4 million, or 64 percent of total revenues in 2004. Mortgage banking fee income decreased 7 percent to $227.8 million from $244.8 million. During this period, fees from the origination process remained stable while net servicing income declined $22.7 million primarily due to increased MSR impairment. Servicing fees increased $28.3 million or 26 percent and amortization of capitalized MSR increased 27 percent, or $19.8 million in 2005 as the servicing portfolio increased 26 percent to $90.8 billion. MSR impairment incre ased $19.7 million, while net hedge results had a negative impact of $11.7 million. See Table 2 - Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income for a breakout of noninterest income as well as mortgage banking origination volume and servicing portfolio levels. Fee income from capital markets decreased 14 percent to $190.0 million from $220.1 million for 2004. For the first six months of 2005, all other noninterest income categories grew 5 percent, or $11.5 million, to $269.0 million. This growth was led by revenue from loan sales and securitizations which increased 163 percent or $14.6 million in 2005 and merchant processing noninterest income, which increased 21 percent or $7.6 million. Partially offsetting these increases was a $6.8 million write-off in 2005 of the net ca pitalized expenses on HELOC held for sale that prepaid faster than anticipated. In addition, net security gains of $4.1 million primarily from sales of securities and divestiture gains of $3.8 million fromthe sale of certain merchant relationships were recognized in 2004. The reasons for the year-to-date trends were similar to the quarterly trend information already discussed.
Net interest income increased 15 percent to $469.0 million from $409.6 million for the first six months of 2004 while earning assets increased 35 percent to $30.5 billion from $22.5 billion in 2004. The year-to-date consolidated margin decreased to 3.09 percent in 2005 from 3.65 percent in 2004. The reasons for the year-to-date trends were similar to the quarterly trend information already discussed.
Total noninterest expense for the first six months of 2005 increased 8 percent to $813.9 million from $756.0 million in 2004. Personnel expense increased $14.4 million or 3 percent in 2005 primarily due to growth initiatives in Retail/Commercial Banking. All other expense categories increased 16 percent or $43.5 million in 2005, which included growth in occupancy expense, operations services, dividends on FTBNA perpetual preferred stock, contract employment, and legal and professional fees. The provision for loan losses increased 9 percent to $28.9 million from $26.5 million in the first six months of 2004. The reasons for the year-to-date trends were similar to the quarterly trend information already discussed.&nbs p;
BUSINESS LINE REVIEW
Retail/Commercial Banking
For the first six months of 2005, pre-tax income increased 25 percent to $233.1 million from $187.0 million in 2004. Total revenues for the six-month period were $653.8 million, an increase of 16 percent from $562.8 million in 2004. Net interest income increased 26 percent, or $83.9 million as earning assets grew 26 percent. Noninterest income increased 3 percent, or $7.1 million primarily due to increased revenue from loan sales and securitizations and merchant processing. Provision for loan losses increased 8 percent in 2005 to $28.7 million from $26.5 million as the loan portfolio has grown by 20 percent compared to the first six months of 2004. Total noninter est expense for the six-month period increased 12 percent to $392.0 million from $349.3 million in 2004. The reasons for the year-to-date trends were similar to the quarterly trend information already discussed.
Mortgage Banking
For the first six months of 2005 pre-tax income decreased 28 percent to $80.8 million from $112.3 million in 2004. Total revenues for the six-month period were $310.9 million, a decrease of 6 percent from $330.7 million in 2004. During this period, fees from the origination process increased $.7 million while net servicing income declined $22.7 million. See Table 2 - Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income for a breakout of noninterest income as well as mortgage banking origination volume and servicing portfolio levels. Total noninterest expense for the six-month period increased 5 percent to $229.9 million from $218.4 million in 2004. Total noninterest expense increased primarily due to growth in the sales force and increased production volume. The reasons for the year-to-date trends were similar to the quarterly trend information already discussed.
Capital Markets
For the first six months of 2005 pre-tax income decreased 71 percent to $16.0 million from $55.8 million in 2004. Total revenues for the six-month period were $180.2 million, a decrease of 19 percent from $222.6 million in 2004. Total noninterest expense for the six-month period
34
decreased 2 percent to $164.2 million from $166.8 million in 2004 primarily due to decreased personnel expenses resulting from lower commissions and incentives associated with the reduced fee income this year. This positive impact was partially offset by increased expenses associated with the acquisition of SLK. The reasons for the year-to-date trends were similar to the quarterly trend information already discussed.
|
Corporate
For the first six months of 2005, Corporate had a pre-tax loss of $16.9 million compared to a pre-tax loss of $5.6 million in 2004. Included in 2005 was $3.6 million in dividends on noncumulative perpetual preferred stock issued in the first quarter 2005, while 2004 results include $3.8 million in security gains primarily due to a portfolio restructuring and venture capital gains.
CAPITAL
Management's objectives are to provide capital sufficient to cover the risks inherent in FHN's businesses, to maintain excess capital to well-capitalized standards and to assure ready access to the capital markets.
Average shareholders' equity increased 12 percent in second quarter 2005 to $2.1 billion from $1.9 billion, reflecting internal capital generation. Period-end shareholders' equity was $2.2 billion on June 30, 2005, up 14 percent from 2004. The increase in shareholders' equity during 2005 came from retention of net income after dividends and the effects of stock option exercises reduced by shares repurchased. The change in capital was reduced by share repurchases, mainly related to stock option exercises, which totaled $33.2 million or .8 million shares primarily in the second half of 2004. Repurchases are made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions and are subject to market conditions, a ccumulation of excess equity and prudent capital management. Pursuant to board authority, FHN may repurchase shares from time to time for its stock option and other compensation plans and will evaluate the level of capital and take action designed to generate or use capital as appropriate, for the interests of the shareholders. In order to maintain FHN's well-capitalized status while sustaining the strong balance sheet growth anticipated in the near-term, FHN has raised approximately $295 million of additional capital and did not repurchase shares in second quarter 2005.
Table 7 - Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Total Number of Shares | | Maximum Number |
| | | | Total Number | | | | Purchased as Part of | | of Shares that May |
| | | | of Shares | | Average Price | | Publicly Announced | | Yet Be Purchased Under |
(Volume in thousands) | Purchased | | Paid per Share | | Plans or Programs | | the Plans or Programs |
2005 | | | | | | | | | |
April 1 to April 30 | - | | - | | - | | 30,010 |
May 1 to May 31 | - | | - | | - | | 30,010 |
June 1 to June 30 | - | | - | | - | | 30,010 |
Total | | | - | | - | | - | | |
Compensation Plan Programs: | | | | | | |
- | A consolidated compensation plan share purchase program was approved on July 20, 2004 and was announced on August 6, 2004. This plan consolidates into a single share purchase program all of the previously authorized compensation plan share programs as well as the renewal of the authorization to purchase shares for use in connection with two compensation plans for which the share purchase authority had expired. The total amount authorized under this consolidated compensation plan share purchase program is 25.1 million shares wh ich may be purchased over the option exercise period of the various compensation plans on or before December 31, 2023. Stock options granted after January 2, 2004, must be exercised no later than the tenth anniversary of the grant date. |
Other Programs: | | | | | | |
- | A non-stock option plan-related authority was announced on October 18, 2000, authorizing the purchase of up to 9.5 million shares. On October 16, 2001, it was announced that FHN's board of directors extended the expiration date of this program from June 30, 2002, until December 31, 2004. On October 19, 2004, the board of directors extended the authorization until December 31, 2007. |
Banking regulators define minimum capital ratios for bank holding companies and their bank subsidiaries. Based on the capital rules and definitions prescribed by the banking regulators, should any depository institution's capital ratios decline below predetermined levels, it would become subject to a series of increasingly restrictive regulatory actions. The system categorizes a depository institution's capital position into one of five categories ranging from well-capitalized to critically under-capitalized. For an institution to qualify as well-capitalized, Tier 1
35
Capital, Total Capital and Leverage capital ratios must be at least 6 percent, 10 percent and 5 percent, respectively. As of June 30, 2005, FHN and FTBNA had sufficient capital to qualify as well-capitalized institutions as shown in Note 6 - Regulatory Capital.
RISK MANAGEMENT
FHN has an enterprise-wide approach to risk governance, measurement, management, and reporting including an economic capital allocation process that is tied to risk profiles used to measure risk-adjusted returns. The Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee oversees risk management governance. Committee membership includes the CEO and other executive officers of FHN. The Executive Vice President (EVP) of Risk Management oversees reporting for the committee. Risk management objectives include evaluating risks inherent in business strategies, monitoring proper balance of risks and returns, and managing risks to minimize the probability of future negative outcomes. &nb sp;The Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee oversees and receives regular reports from the Senior Credit Policy Committee, Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO), Capital Management Committee and Operational Risk Committee. The EVP and Chief Credit Officer, EVP of Interest Rate Risk Management, EVP and Chief Financial Officer and EVP of Risk Management chair these committees respectively. Reports regarding Credit, Asset/Liability, Market, Capital Management and Operational Risks are provided to the Executive and Audit Committees of the Board and to the full Board.
Risk management practices include key elements such as independent checks and balances, formal authority limits, policies and procedures, and portfolio management all executed through experienced personnel. The internal audit department also evaluates risk management activities. These activities include performing internal audits, the results of which are reviewed with management and the Audit Committee, as appropriate.
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Interest rate sensitivity risk is defined as the risk that future changes in interest rates will adversely impact income. The primary objective of managing interest rate risk is to minimize the volatility to earnings from changes in interest rates and preserve the value of FHN's capital. ALCO, a committee consisting of senior management that meets regularly, is responsible for coordinating the financial management of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is managed by structuring the balance sheet to attempt to maintain the desired level of net interest income while managing interest rate risk and liquidity. Derivatives are used to manage interest rate risk inherent i n other revenue streams.
Net interest income and the financial condition of FHN are affected by changes in the level of market interest rates as the repricing characteristics of its loans and other assets do not necessarily match those of its deposits, other borrowings and capital. To the extent that earning assets reprice more quickly than liabilities, this position will benefit net interest income in a rising interest rate environment and will negatively impact net interest income in a declining interest rate environment. In the case of floating-rate assets and liabilities, FHN may also be exposed to basis risk, which results from changing spreads between loan and deposit rates. Generally, when interest rates decline the prepayment risk for MSR in Mortgage Banking increases.
In certain cases, derivative financial instruments are used to aid in managing the exposure of the balance sheet and related net interest income and noninterest income to changes in interest rates. For example, Mortgage Banking uses derivatives to protect against MSR prepayment risk and against changes in fair value of the mortgage pipeline and warehouse. Capital Markets uses derivatives to protect against the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of its inventory due to changes in interest rates. The prepayment risk in our loan portfolio is not hedged with derivatives or otherwise.
In addition to the impact to balance sheet accounts, the income from Mortgage Banking and Capital Markets are affected by changes in interest rates. Generally, an increase in rates should reduce origination fees and profit from the sale of loans. A flattening yield curve negatively impacts Mortgage Banking's hedging costs as well as warehouse spreads. In addition, a flattening yield curve at a time of uncertainty concerning the future interest rate environment negatively impacts the demand for fixed income securities and, therefore, Capital Markets' revenue, as well as trading inventory spreads.
LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT
ALCO focuses on being able to fund assets with liabilities of the appropriate duration, as well as the risk of not being able to meet unexpected cash needs. The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the continuous availability of funds to meet the demands of depositors, other creditors and borrowers, and the requirements of ongoing operations. This objective is met by maintaining liquid assets in the form of trading securities and securities available for sale, maintaining sufficient unused borrowing capacity in the national money
36
markets, growing core deposits, and the repayment of loans and the capability to sell or securitize loans. ALCO is responsible for managing these needs by taking into account the marketability of assets; the sources, stability and availability of funding; and the level of unfunded commitments. Funds are available from a number of sources, including core deposits, the securities available for sale portfolio, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Reserve Banks, access to capital markets through issuance of senior or subordinated bank notes and institutional certificates of deposit, availability to the overnight and term Federal Funds markets, access to retail brokered certificates of deposit, dealer and commercial customer repurchase agreements, and through the sale or securitization of loans.
Core deposits are a significant source of funding and have been a stable source of liquidity for banks. These deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to the extent authorized by law. For second quarter 2005 and 2004, the average total loans, excluding loans held for sale, to core deposits ratio was 149 percent and 136 percent, respectively. As loan growth currently exceeds core deposit growth, alternative sources of funding loan growth may be necessary in order to maintain an adequate liquidity position. One means of maintaining a stable liquidity position is to sell loans either through whole-loan sales or loan securitizations. FHN peri odically evaluates its liquidity position in conjunction with determining its ability and intent to hold loans to maturity.
FTBNA also has the ability to enhance its liquidity position by issuing preferred equity or incurring other debt. FHN also evaluates alternative sources of funding, including loan sales, securitizations, syndications, Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, debt offerings and equity offerings in its management of liquidity. Due to considerable growth of the HELOC portfolio, whole-loan sales and securitizations of this loan type are an important funding source and should grow in significance in future periods.
Prior to February 2005, FTBNA had a bank note program under which the bank was able to borrow funds from time to time at maturities of 30 days to 30 years. This bank note program has been terminated in connection with the establishment of a new program. That termination does not affect any previously-issued notes outstanding. In February 2005, FTBNA established a new bank note program providing additional liquidity of $5.0 billion. This bank note program provides FTBNA with a facility under which it may continuously issue and offer short- and medium-term unsecured notes. On June 30, 2005, $4.7 billion was available under current conditions through the bank note program as a funding source.
Liquidity has also been obtained through FTBNA's issuance of 300,000 shares of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock which provided approximately $295 million additional capital (see also Note 10 - Preferred Stock of Subsidiary). In addition, liquidity has been obtained through issuance of $300.0 million of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in FHN's junior subordinated debentures through two Delaware business trusts wholly owned by FHN and through preferred stock issued by an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of FHN ($45.3 million on June 30, 2005).
The Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows provide information on cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the six-month periods ending June 30, 2005 and 2004. Net cash provided by financing activities was the primary contributor to the increase in cash and cash equivalents in both six-month periods. Growth in deposits comprised a significant portion of FHN's positive cash flows from financing activities in 2005. In addition, growth in short-term borrowings contributed to the net cash provided from financing activities in both periods. In 2004 term borrowings also provided liquidity. These funds were utilized to meet the liquidity needs related to the strong loan growth that is reflecte d in the negative cash flows from investing activities in 2005 and 2004. Negative cash flows from investing activities also resulted from acquisition activity and a larger investment portfolio due to balance sheet repositioning in 2005. Sales and maturities of investment securities largely offset purchases in 2004.
Parent company liquidity is maintained by cash flows from dividends and interest payments collected from subsidiaries, which represent the primary source of funds to pay dividends to shareholders and interest to debt holders. The parent company also has the ability to enhance its liquidity position by raising equity or incurring debt. Under an effective shelf registration statement on file with the SEC, FHN, as of June 30, 2005, may offer from time to time at its discretion, debt securities, and common and preferred stock aggregating up to $125 million.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND OTHER CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
First Horizon Home Loans originates mortgage loans through its retail and wholesale operations and also purchases mortgage loans from third-party mortgage bankers (known as correspondent brokers) for sale to secondary market investors and subsequently services the majority of those loans. Additionally, FTN Financial Capital Assets Corporation frequently purchases the same types of loans from customers. Substantially all of these mortgage loans are exchanged for securities, which are issued through investors, including government-sponsored enterprises (GSE), such as GNMA for federally insured loans and FNMA and FHLMC for conventional loans, and then sold in the secondary markets. Each of the GSE has specific guidelines and criteria for sellers and servicers of l oans backing their respective securities. Many private investors are also active in the secondary market as issuers and investors. The risk of credit loss with regard to the principal amount of the loans sold is generally transferred to investors upon sale to the secondary market. To the extent that transferred loans are subsequently determined not to meet the agreed upon qualifications or criteria, the purchaser has the right to return
37
those loans to FHN. In addition, certain mortgage loans are sold to investors with limited or full recourse in the event of mortgage foreclosure (refer to discussion of foreclosure reserves under Critical Accounting Policies). After sale, these loans are not reflected on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition.
FHN's use of GSE as an efficient outlet for mortgage loan production is an essential source of liquidity for FHN and other participants in the housing industry. During second quarter 2005, $4.6 billion of conventional and federally insured mortgage loans were securitized and sold by First Horizon Home Loans through these GSE.
Certain of FHN's originated loans, including second-lien mortgages and HELOC originated primarily through FTBNA, do not conform to the requirements for sale or securitization through GSE. FHN pools and securitizes these non-conforming loans in proprietary transactions. After securitization and sale, these loans are not reflected on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition. These transactions, which are conducted through single-purpose business trusts, are the most efficient way for FHN and other participants in the housing industry to monetize these assets. On June 30, 2005, the outstanding principal amount of loans in these off-balance sheet business trusts was $15.3 billion. Given the significance of FHN's origination of non-conforming loans, the use of single-purpose business trusts to securitize these loans is an important source of liquidity to FHN.
FHN has various other financial obligations which may require future cash payments. Purchase obligations represent obligations under agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on FHN and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions, and the approximate timing of the transaction. In addition, FHN enters into commitments to extend credit to borrowers, including loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and commercial letters of credit. These commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, in that these commitments often expire without being drawn upon.
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
Capital markets buys and sells various types of securities for its customers. When these securities settle on a delayed basis, they are considered forward contracts. Inventory positions are limited to the procurement of securities solely for distribution to customers by the sales staff, and ALCO policies and guidelines have been established with the objective of limiting the risk in managing this inventory.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The capital management objectives of FHN are to provide capital sufficient to cover the risks inherent in FHN's businesses, to maintain excess capital to well-capitalized standards and to assure ready access to the capital markets. Management has a Capital Management committee that is responsible for capital management oversight and provides a forum for addressing management issues related to capital adequacy. The committee reviews sources and uses of capital, key capital ratios, segment economic capital allocation methodologies, and other factors in monitoring and managing current capital levels, as well as potential future sources and uses of capital. The committee also recommends capital management policies, which are submitted for approval to the Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee and the Board.
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
Credit risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in a borrower's ability to meet its financial obligations under agreed upon terms. FHN is subject to credit risk in lending, trading, investing, liquidity/funding and asset management activities. The nature and amount of credit risk depends on the types of transactions, the structure of those transactions and the parties involved. In general, credit risk is incidental to trading, liquidity/funding and asset management activities, while it is central to the profit strategy in lending. As a result, the majority of credit risk is associated with lending activities.
FHN has processes and management committees in place that are designed to assess and monitor credit risks. Management's Asset Quality Committee has the responsibility to evaluate its assessment of current asset quality for each lending product. In addition, the Asset Quality Committee evaluates the projected changes in classified loans, non-performing assets and charge-offs. A primary objective of this committee is to provide information about changing trends in asset quality by region or loan product, and to provide to senior management a current assessment of credit quality as part of the estimation process for determining the allowance for loan losses. The Senior Credit Watch Com mittee has primary responsibility to enforce proper loan risk grading, to identify credit problems, and to monitor actions to rehabilitate certain credits. Management also has a Senior Credit Policy Committee that is responsible for enterprise-wide credit risk oversight and provides a forum for addressing management issues. The committee also recommends credit policies, which are submitted for approval to the Executive Committee of the Board, and underwriting guidelines to manage the level and composition of credit risk in its loan portfolio and
38
review performance relative to these policies. In addition, the Financial Counterparty Credit Committee, composed of senior managers, assesses the credit risk of financial counterparties and sets limits for exposure based upon the credit quality of the counterparty. FHN's goal is to manage risk and price loan products based on risk management decisions and strategies. Management strives to identify potential problem loans and nonperforming loans early enough to correct the deficiencies. It is management's objective that both charge-offs and asset write-downs are recorded promptly, based on management's assessments of current collateral values and the borrower's ability to repay.
OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Operational risk is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems or from external events. This risk is inherent in all businesses. Management, measurement, and reporting of operational risk are overseen by the Operational Risk Committee, which is chaired by the EVP of Risk Management. Key representatives from the business segments, legal, shared services, risk management, and insurance are represented on the committee. Subcommittees manage and report on business continuity planning, data security, insurance, compliance, records management, product and system development and reputation risks. Summary reports of the committee 's activities and decisions are provided to the Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee. Significant emphasis is dedicated to refinement of processes and tools to aid in measuring and managing material operational risks and providing for a culture of awareness and accountability.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
FHN's accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. The consolidated condensed financial statements of FHN are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the industries in which it operates. The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make certain judgments and assumptions in determining accounting estimates. Accounting estimates are considered critical if (a) the estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made, and (b) different estimates re asonably could have been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, that would have a material impact on the presentation of FHN's financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations.
It ismanagement's practice to discuss critical accounting policies with the Board of Directors' Audit Committee including the development, selection and disclosure of the critical accounting estimates. Management believes the following critical accounting policies are both important to the portrayal of the company's financial condition and results of operations and require subjective or complex judgments. These judgments about critical accounting estimates are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements.
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS AND OTHER RELATED RETAINED INTERESTS
When First Horizon Home Loans sells mortgage loans in the secondary market to investors, it generally retains the right to service the loans sold in exchange for a servicing fee that is collected over the life of the loan as the payments are received from the borrower. An amount is capitalized as MSR on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition based on the expected present value of the anticipated cash flows received for servicing the loan, net of the estimated costs of servicing the loan. During second quarter 2005 and 2004, First Horizon Home Loans capitalized $93.3 million and $113.7 million, respectively, of MSR in connection with sales of first-lien mortgage loans in the secondary market and acquisition of servicing rights from third parties. On June 30, 2005 and 2004, the total outstanding principal amount of First Horizon Home Loans' first-lien servicing portfolio aggregated $90.8 billion and $72.2 billion, respectively.
MSR Estimated Fair Value
The fair value of MSR typically rises as market interest rates increase and declines as market interest rates decrease; however, the extent to which this occurs depends in part on (1) the magnitude of changes in market interest rates, and (2) the differential between the then current market interest rates for mortgage loans and the mortgage interest rates included in the mortgage-servicing portfolio.
Since sales of MSR tend to occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of the sales are typically not readily available, there is a limited market to refer to in determining the fair value of MSR. As such, like other participants in the mortgage banking business, First Horizon Home Loans relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its MSR. This model calculates estimated fair value of the MSR using numerous tranches of MSR, which share similar key characteristics, such as interest rates, type of product (fixed vs. variable), age (new, seasoned, moderate), agency type and other factors. First Horizon Home Loans uses assumptions in
39
the model that it believes are comparable to those used by other participants in the mortgage banking business and reviews estimated fair values and assumptions with third-party brokers and other service providers on a quarterly basis. First Horizon Home Loans also compares its estimates of fair value and assumptions to recent market activity and against its own experience.
Estimating the cash flow components of net servicing income from the loan and the resultant fair value of the MSR requires FHN to make several critical assumptions based upon current market and loan production data.
Prepayment Speeds: Generally, when market interest rates decline and other factors favorable to prepayments occur there is a corresponding increase in actual and expected borrower prepayments as customers refinance existing mortgages under more favorable interest rate terms. When a mortgage loan is prepaid, or is expected to prepay faster than originally expected, the anticipated cash flows associated with servicing that loan are terminated or reduced, resulting in a reduction, or impairment, to the fair value of the capitalized MSR. To the extent that actual borrower prepayments do not react as anticipated by the prepayment model (i.e., the historical data observed in the model does not correspond to actual market activity), it is possible that the prepa yment model could fail to accurately predict mortgage prepayments and could result in significant earnings volatility. To estimate prepayment speeds, First Horizon Home Loans utilizes a third-party prepayment model, which is based upon statistically derived data linked to certain key principal indicators involving historical borrower prepayment activity associated with mortgage loans in the secondary market, current market interest rates and other factors. For purposes of model valuation, estimates are made for each product type within the MSR portfolio on a monthly basis.
Discount Rate: Represents the rate at which the expected cash flows are discounted to arrive at the net present value of servicing income. Discount rates will change with market conditions (i.e., supply vs. demand) and be reflective of the yields expected to be earned by market participants investing in MSR.
Cost to Service: Expected costs to service are estimated based upon the incremental costs that a market participant would use in evaluating the potential acquisition of MSR.
Float Income: Estimated float income is driven by expected float balances (principal, interest and escrow payments that are held pending remittance to the investor or other third party) and current market interest rates, including the thirty-day London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and five-year swap interest rates, which are updated on a monthly basis for purposes of estimating the fair market value of MSR.
First Horizon Home Loans engages in a process referred to as "price discovery" on a monthly basis to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair value of MSR. Price discovery is conducted through a process of obtaining the following information: (a) quarterly informal valuation of the servicing portfolio by a prominent mortgage-servicing broker, and (b) a collection of surveys and benchmarking data available through third party participants in the mortgage banking business. Although there is no single source of market information that can be relied upon to assess the fair value of MSR, First Horizon Home Loans reviews all information obtained during price discovery to determine whether the estimated fair value of MSR is reasonable when compared to market information. &n bsp;On June 30, 2005 and 2004, First Horizon Home Loans determined that its MSR valuations and assumptions were reasonable based on the price discovery process.
The First Horizon Risk Management Committee (FHRMC) submits the overall assessment of the estimated fair value of MSR monthly for review. The FHRMC is responsible for approving the critical assumptions used by management to determine the estimated fair value of First Horizon Home Loans' MSR. Each quarter,FHN's MSR Committee reviews the original valuation, impairment, and the initial capitalization rates for newly originated MSR. In addition, each quarter the Executive Committee ofFHN's board of directors reviews the initial capitalization rates and approves the amortization expense.
MSR are included on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition, net of accumulated amortization. The changes in value of MSR are included as a component of Mortgage Banking - Noninterest Income on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income.
Hedging the Fair Value of MSR
First Horizon Home Loans also enters into interest rate contracts (including swaps, swaptions, and mortgage forward sales contracts) to hedge against the effects of changes in fair value of its MSR due solely to changes in the benchmark interest rate (10-year LIBOR swap rate). Substantially all capitalized MSR are hedged for economic purposes with the vast majority of MSR routinely qualifying for hedge accounting. For purposes of measuring effectiveness of the hedge, time decay and recognized net interest income, including changes in value attributable to changes in spot and forward prices, if applicable, are excluded from the change in value of the related derivatives. Interest rate derivative contracts used to hedge against interest rate risk in the servicing portfolio are designated to specific risk tranches of servicing. First Horizon Home Loans enters into hedges of the MSR to minimize the effects of loss in value of MSR associated with increased prepayment activity that generally results from declining interest rates. In a rising interest rate environment, the value of the MSR generally will increase while the value of the hedge instruments will decline. Hedges are reset at least monthly and more frequently, as
40
needed, to respond to changes in interest rates or hedge composition. Generally, a coverage ratio approximating 100 percent is maintained on hedged MSR. Prior to acquiring a new hedge instrument, First Horizon Home Loans performs a prospective evaluation of anticipated hedge effectiveness by reviewing the historical regression between the underlying index of the proposed hedge instrument and the mortgage rate. At the end of each hedge period, the change in the fair value of the hedged MSR asset due to the change in benchmark interest rate is calculated and becomes an historical data point. Retrospective hedge effectiveness is determined by performing a regression analysis of all collected data points over a rolling 12 month period. Effective hedging under SFAS No. 133 results in adjustments to the recorded value of the MSR. These basis adjustments, as well as the change in fair value of derivatives attributable to effective hedging, are included as a component of servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income.
MSR subject to SFAS No. 133 hedges totaled $1.0 billion on June 30, 2005 and 2004. The related derivatives, an asset of $130.6 million and a liability of $3.7 million on June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were classified as other assets or other liabilities. For second quarter 2005 and 2004, total SFAS No. 133 ineffectiveness was a gain of $17.3 million and a loss of $1.1 million, respectively. These amounts were recognized as a component of net servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income. Included in these amounts were $12.4 million and $11.8 million in second quarter 2005 and 2004, respectively, representing recognized net interest income and time decay on various hedges, which were excluded for purposes of measuring hedge effectiveness. The remaining ineffectiveness was a gain of $4.9 million and a loss of $12.9 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively.
First Horizon Home Loans generally experiences increased loan origination and production in periods of low interest rates, which at the time of sale result in the capitalization of new MSR associated with new production. This provides for a "natural hedge" in the mortgage banking business cycle. New production and origination does not prevent First Horizon Home Loans from recognizing impairment expense on existing servicing rights as a result of prepayments; rather, the new production volume results in loan origination fees and the capitalization of MSR as a component of realized gains related to the sale of such loans in the secondary market, thus the natural hedge, which tends to offset a portion of the MSR impairment charges during a period of low interest rates. In a period of increased borrower prepayments, impairment can be significantly offset by a strong replenishment rate and strong net margins on new loan originations. To the extent that First Horizon Home Loans is unable to maintain a strong replenishment rate, or in the event that the net margin on new loan originations declines from historical experience, the value of the natural hedge may diminish, thereby significantly impacting the results of operations in a period of increased borrower prepayments.
First Horizon Home Loans does not specifically hedge the change in fair value of MSR attributed to other risks, including unanticipated prepayments (representing the difference between actual prepayment experience and estimated prepayments derived from the model, as described above), basis risk (meaning, the risk that changes in the benchmark interest rate may not correlate to changes in the mortgage market interest rate), discount rates, cost to service and other factors. To the extent that these other factors result in changes to the fair value of MSR, First Horizon experiences volatility in current earnings due to the fact that these risks are not currently hedged.
Actual vs. Estimated MSR Critical Assumptions
As discussed above, the estimate of the cash flow components of net servicing income associated with MSR requires management to make several critical assumptions based upon current market and loan production data, including prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service and float income. Inherent in estimating such assumptions are uncertainties associated with the mortgage banking business (primarily, the change in market interest rates which vary significantly due to multiple economic and non-economic factors) as well as the composition of the MSR portfolio, which is not static and changes significantly based upon the production and sale of new loans, customer prepayment experience and other factors. As a result, the estimated assumptions used to value MSR - particularly the estimate of prepayment speeds - can vary significantly from actual experience, resulting in the recognition of additional impairment charges in current earnings. Table 8 provides a summary of actual and estimated weighted average prepayment speeds and float income used in determining the estimated fair value of MSR for the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. Although the estimates of discount rates and cost to service assumptions used in determining the estimated fair value of MSR can vary from actual experience, such differences have not been material for the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
For the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the amortization rates calculated by the model were 16.1 percent and 15.1 percent, respectively, while the related actual runoff was 25.3 percent and 35.9 percent, respectively. The difference between the amortization rate calculated by the model and the actual runoff experienced was the primary reason for the impairment charges associated with MSR for second quarter 2005 of $23.5 million. For the period ended June 30, 2004, impairment resulting from the difference between the amortization rate calculated by the model and actual run off experienced was reduced by the effect of the restratification of the servicing portfolio tranches, which was triggered by the impact that rising interest rates had o n the predominate risk characteristics of the MSR portfolio, resulting in a recapture of a portion of the valuation reserve and, therefore, reduced impairment of $15.4 million, or a net recovery of $.4 million for the quarter.
41
Table 8 - Mortgage Banking MSR Critical Assumptions | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Three Months Ended |
| | | | | | | June 30 |
(Dollars in millions) | | | | | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Prepayment speeds | | | | | | | | |
| Actual | | | | | 25.3% | | 35.9% |
| Estimated* | | | | | | 21.3 | | 27.5 |
Float income | | | | | | | | |
| Actual | | | | | | $ 11.1 | | $ 6.9 |
| Estimated | | | | | | 8.0 | | 5.3 |
* Estimated prepayment speeds represent monthly average prepayment speed estimates for each of the periods presented. |
Interest-Only Certificates Fair Value - Residential Mortgage Loans
In certain cases, when First Horizon Home Loans sells mortgage loans in the secondary market, it retains an interest in the mortgage loans sold primarily through interest-only certificates. Interest-only certificates are financial assets, which represent rights to receive earnings from serviced assets that exceed contractually specified servicing fees. Consistent with MSR, the fair value of an interest-only certificate typically rises as market interest rates increase and declines as market interest rates decrease. Additionally, similar to MSR, the market for interest-only certificates is limited, and the precise terms of transactions involving interest-only certificates are not typically readily available. Acco rdingly, First Horizon Home Loans relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its interest-only certificates.
Estimating the cash flow components and the resultant fair value of the interest-only certificates requires First Horizon Home Loans to make certain critical assumptions based upon current market and loan production data. The primary critical assumptions used by First Horizon Home Loans to estimate the fair value of interest-only securities include prepayment speeds and discount rates, as discussed above. First Horizon Home Loans' interest-only certificates are included as a component of trading securities on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition, with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of mortgage banking income on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income.
Hedging the Fair Value of Interest-Only Certificates
First Horizon Home Loans utilizes derivatives (including swaps, swaptions, and mortgage forward sales contracts) that change in value inversely to the movement of interest rates to protect the value of its interest-only securities as an economic hedge. Realized and unrealized gains and losses associated with the change in fair value of derivatives used in the economic hedge of interest-only securities are included in current earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of servicing income. Interest-only securities are included in trading securities with changes in fair value recognized currently in earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of servicing income.
The extent to which the change in fair value of interest-only securities is offset by the change in fair value of the derivatives used to hedge these instruments depends primarily on the hedge coverage ratio maintained by First Horizon Home Loans. Also, as noted above, to the extent that actual borrower prepayments do not react as anticipated by the prepayment model (i.e., the historical data observed in the model does not correspond to actual market activity), it is possible that the prepayment model could fail to accurately predict mortgage prepayments, which could significantly impact First Horizon Home Loans' ability to effectively hedge certain components of the change in fair value of interest-only certificates and could result in significant earnings volatility.
Residual-Interest Certificates Fair Value - HELOC and Second-lien Mortgages
In certain cases, when First Horizon Equity Lending sells HELOC or second-lien mortgages in the secondary market, it retains an interest in the loans sold primarily through a residual-interest certificate. Residual-interest certificates are financial assets which represent rights to receive earnings to the extent of excess income generated by the underlying loan collateral of certain mortgage-backed securities, which is not needed to meet contractual obligations of senior security holders. The fair value of a residual-interest certificate typically changes based on the differences between modeled prepayment speeds and credit losses and actual experience. Additionally, similar to MSR and interest-only certificates, the market for residual-interest certificates is limited, and the precise terms of transactions i nvolving residual-interest certificates are not typically readily available. Accordingly, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model, which is prepared monthly, to estimate the fair value of its residual-interest certificates.
Estimating the cash flow components and the resultant fair value of the residual-interest certificates requires FHN to make certain critical assumptions based upon current market and loan production data. The primary critical assumptions used by FHN to estimate the fair value
42
of residual-interest securities include prepayment speeds, credit losses and discount rates, as discussed above. FHN's residual-interest certificates are included as a component of trading securities on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition, with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of other income on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income.
PIPELINE AND WAREHOUSE
During the period of loan origination and prior to the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market, First Horizon Home Loans has exposure to mortgage loans that are in the "mortgage pipeline" and the "mortgage warehouse". The mortgage pipeline consists of loan applications that have been received, but have not yet closed as loans. Pipeline loans are either "floating" or "locked". A floating pipeline loan is one on which an interest rate has not been locked by the borrower. A locked pipeline loan is one on which the potential borrower has set the interest rate for the loan by entering into an interest rate lock commitment resulting in interest rate risk to First Horizon Home Loans. Once a mortgage loan is closed and funded, it is included within the mortgage warehouse, or the "inventory" of mortgage loans that are awaiting sale and delivery (curren tly an average of approximately 30 days) into the secondary market. First Horizon Home Loans is exposed to credit risk while a mortgage loan is in the warehouse. Third party models are used in managing interest rate risk related to price movements on loans in the pipeline and the warehouse.
First Horizon Home Loans' warehouse (first-lien mortgage loans held for sale) is subject to changes in fair value, primarily due to fluctuations in interest rates from the loan closing date through the date of sale of the loan into the secondary market. Typically, the fair value of the warehouse declines in value when interest rates increase and rises in value when interest rates decrease. To mitigate this risk, First Horizon Home Loans enters into forward sales contracts and futures contracts to provide an economic hedge against those changes in fair value on a significant portion of the warehouse. These derivatives are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as a component of the gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income.
To the extent that these interest rate derivatives are designated to hedge specific similar assets in the warehouse and prospective analyses indicate that high correlation is expected, the hedged loans qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. If the regression analysis does not show consistently strong correlation, hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 is not attempted. Anticipated correlation is determined based on the historical regressions between the change in fair value of the derivatives and the change in fair value of the hedged mortgage loans. Hedges are reset daily and the statistical correlation is calculated using these daily data points which are accumulated monthly. Retrospective hedge effectiveness is measured monthly using the regression correlation at the end of the month. First Horizon Home Loans generally mainta ins a coverage ratio (the ratio of expected change in the fair value of derivatives to expected change in the fair value of hedged assets) of approximately 100 percent on warehouse loans accounted for under SFAS No. 133. Effective SFAS No. 133 hedging results in adjustments to the recorded value of those hedged loans which adjustments are included as a component of the gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income.
Warehouse loans qualifying for SFAS No. 133 hedge accounting treatment totaled $224.0 billion and $638.3 billion on June 30, 2005 and 2004 respectively. The balance sheet impact of the related derivatives was a liability of $.8 million and $6.3 million on June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For second quarter 2005 and 2004, gains of $3.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively, representing the hedge ineffectiveness of these fair value hedges, were recognized as a component of gain or loss on sale of loans.
43
Mortgage banking interest rate lock commitments are short-term commitments to fund mortgage loan applications in process (the pipeline) for a fixed term at a fixed price. During the term of an interest rate lock commitment, First Horizon Home Loans has the risk that interest rates will change from the rate quoted to the borrower. First Horizon Home Loans enters into forward sales contracts with respect to fixed rate loan commitments and futures contracts with respect to adjustable rate loan commitments as economic hedges designed to protect the value of the interest rate lock commitment from changes in value due to changes in interest rates. Under SFAS No. 133 interest rate lock commitments qualify as derivative financial instruments and as such do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. As a result, the inte rest rate lock commitments are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income. Interest rate lock commitments generally have a term of up to 60 days before the closing of the loan. The interest rate lock commitment, however, does not bind the potential borrower to entering into the loan, nor does it guarantee that First Horizon Home Loans will approve the potential borrower for the loan. Therefore, First Horizon Home Loans makes estimates of expected "fallout" (locked pipeline loans not expected to close), using models which consider cumulative historical fallout rates and other factors. Fallout can occur for a variety of reasons including falling rate environments when a borrower will abandon an interest rate lock commitment at one lender and enter into a new lower interest rate lock commitment at another, when a borrower is not approved as an acceptable credit by the lender, or for a variety of other non-economic reasons. Note that once a loan is closed, the risk of fallout is eliminated and the associated mortgage loan is included in the mortgage loan warehouse.
The extent to which First Horizon Home Loans is able to economically hedge changes in the mortgage pipeline depends largely on the hedge coverage ratio that is maintained relative to mortgage loans in the pipeline. The hedge coverage ratio can change significantly due to changes in market interest rates and the associated forward commitment prices for sales of mortgage loans in the secondary market. Increases or decreases in the hedge coverage ratio can result in significant earnings volatility to FHN.
For the periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the valuation model utilized to estimate the fair value of interest rate lock commitments assumes a zero fair value on the date of the lock with the borrower. Subsequent to the lock date, the model calculates the change in value due solely to the change in interest rates resulting in an asset with an estimated fair value of $25.4 million and $21.5 million on June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
FORECLOSURE RESERVES
As discussed above, First Horizon Home Loans typically originates mortgage loans with the intent to sell those loans to GSE and other private investors in the secondary market. Certain of the mortgage loans are sold with limited or full recourse in the event of foreclosure. On June 30, 2005 and 2004, $3.3 billion and $3.6 billion, respectively, of mortgage loans were outstanding which were sold under limited recourse arrangements where some portion of the principal is at risk. On June 30, 2005 and 2004, $188.9 million and $227.9 million, respectively, of mortgage loans were outstanding which were sold under full recourse arrangements.
Loans sold with limited recourse include loans sold under government guaranteed mortgage loan programs including the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Veterans Administration (VA). First Horizon Home Loans continues to absorb losses due to uncollected interest and foreclosure costs and/or limited risk of credit losses in the event of foreclosure of the mortgage loan sold. Generally, the amount of recourse liability in the event of foreclosure is determined based upon the respective government program and/or the sale or disposal of the foreclosed property collateralizing the mortgage loan. Another instance of limited recourse is the VA/No bid. In this case, the VA guarantee is limited and First Horizon Hom e Loans may be required to fund any deficiency in excess of the VA guarantee if the loan goes to foreclosure.
Loans sold with full recourse generally include mortgage loans sold to investors in the secondary market which are uninsurable under government guaranteed mortgage loan programs, due to issues associated with underwriting activities, documentation or other concerns.
Management closely monitors historical experience, borrower payment activity, current economic trends and other risk factors, and establishes a reserve for foreclosure losses for loans sold with limited and full recourse which management believes is sufficient to cover incurred foreclosure losses in the servicing portfolio. The reserve for foreclosure losses is based upon a historical progression model using a rolling 12-month average, which predicts the probability or frequency of a mortgage loan entering foreclosure. In addition, other factors are considered, including qualitative and quantitative factors (e.g., current economic conditions, past collection experience, risk characteristics of the current portfolio and other factors), which are not defined by historical loss trends or severity of losses. On June 30, 2005 and 2004, the foreclosure reserve was $15.5 million and $19.0 million, respectively. While the servicing portfolio has grown from $72.2 billion on June 30, 2004, to $90.8 billion on June 30, 2005, the foreclosure reserve has decreased primarily due to a reduction in the recourse portfolio.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Management's policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb estimated probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Management performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews of its loan portfolio to identify trends and to assess the overall
44
collectibility of the loan portfolio. Accounting standards require that loan losses be recorded when management determines it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Management believes the accounting estimate related to the allowance for loan losses is a "critical accounting estimate" because: changes in it can materially affect the provision for loan losses and net income, it requires management to predict borrowers' likelihood or capacity to repay, and it requires management to distinguish between losses incurred as of a balance sheet date and losses expected to be incurred in the future. Accordingly, this is a highly subjective process and requires si gnificant judgment since it is often difficult to determine when specific loss events may actually occur. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries and is decreased by charged-off loans. This critical accounting estimate applies primarily to the Retail/Commercial Banking segment. The Executive Committee of FHN's board of directors approves the level of the allowance for loan losses.
FHN's methodology for estimating the allowance for loan losses is not only critical to the accounting estimate, but to the credit risk management function as well. Key components of the estimation process are as follows: (1) commercial loans determined by management to be individually impaired loans are evaluated individually and specific reserves are determined based on the difference between the outstanding loan amount and the estimated net realizable value of the collateral (if collateral dependent) or the present value of expected future cash flows; (2) individual commercial loans not considered to be individually impaired are segmented based on similar credit risk characteristics and evaluated on a pool basis; (3) retail loans are segmented based on loan types and credit score bands and loan to value; (4) reserve rates for each portfolio segment are calculated based on historical charge-offs and are adjusted by management to reflect current events, trends and conditions (including economic factors and trends); and (5) management's estimate of probable incurred losses reflects the reserve rate applied against the balance of loans in each segment of the loan portfolio.
Principal loan amounts are charged off against the allowance for loan losses in the period in which the loan or any portion of the loan is deemed to be uncollectible.
FHN believes that the critical assumptions underlying the accounting estimate made by management include: (1) the commercial loan portfolio has been properly risk graded based on information about borrowers in specific industries and specific issues with respect to single borrowers; (2) borrower specific information made available toFHN is current and accurate; (3)the loan portfolio has been segmented properly and individual loans have similar credit risk characteristics and will behave similarly; (4) known significant loss events that have occurred were considered by management at the time of assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; (5) the economic factors utilized in the allowance for loan losses est imate are used as a measure of actual incurred losses; (6) the period of history used for historical loss factors is indicative of the current environment; and (7) the reserve rates, as well as other adjustments estimated by management for current events, trends, and conditions, utilized in the process reflect an estimate of losses that have been incurred as of the date of the financial statements.
While management uses the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses and methodology may be necessary if economic or other conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the estimates or, if required by regulators, based upon information at the time of their examinations. Such adjustments to original estimates, as necessary, are made in the period in which these factors and other relevant considerations indicate that loss levels vary from previous estimates. There have been no significant changes to the methodology for the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
GOODWILL AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPAIRMENT
FHN's policy is to assessgoodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or between annual assessments if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Impairment is the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Accounting standards require management to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit in making the assessment of impairment at least annually. As of October 1, 2004, FHN engaged an independent valuation firm to compute the fair value estimates of each reporting unit as part of its annual impairment assessment. The independent valuation utilized three separate valuation methodologies and applied a weighted average to each methodology in order to determine fair value for each reporting unit. The valuation as of October 1, 2004, indicated no goodwill impairment for any of the reporting units.
Managementbelieves the accounting estimates associated with determining fair value as part of the goodwill impairment test is a "critical accounting estimate" because estimates and assumptions are made about FHN's future performance and cash flows, as well as other prevailing market factors (interest rates, economic trends, etc.). FHN's policy allows management to make the determination of fair value using internal cash flow models or by engaging independent third parties. If a charge to operations for impairment results, this amount would be reported separately as a component of noninterest expense. This critical accounting estimate applies to the Retail/Commercial Banking, Mortgage Banking, and Capital Markets business segments. Reporting units have been defined as the same level as the operating business segments.
45
The impairment testing process conducted byFHN begins by assigning net assets and goodwill to each reporting unit. FHN then completes "step one" of the impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit (as determined based on the discussion below) with the recorded book value (or "carrying amount") of its net assets, with goodwill included in the computation of the carrying amount. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of that reporting unit is not considered impaired, and "step two" of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, step two of the impairment test is performed to d etermine the amount of impairment. Step two of the impairment test compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill to the "implied fair value" of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is computed by assuming all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit would be adjusted to the current fair value, with the offset as an adjustment to goodwill. This adjusted goodwill balance is the implied fair value used in step two. An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.
In connection with obtaining the independent valuation, management provided certain data and information that was utilized by the third party in its determination of fair value. This information included budgeted and forecasted earnings of FHN at the reporting unit level. Management believes that this information is a critical assumption underlying the estimate of fair value. The independent third party made other assumptions critical to the process, including discount rates, asset and liability growth rates, and other income and expense estimates, through discussions with management.
While management uses the best information available to estimate future performance for each reporting unit, future adjustments to management's projections may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the estimates.
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
A liability is contingent if the amount is not presently known, but may become known in the future as a result of the occurrence of some uncertain future event. FHN estimates its contingent liabilities based on management's estimates about the probability of outcomes and their ability to estimate the range of exposure. Accounting standards require that a liability be recorded if management determines that it is probable that a loss has occurred and the loss can be reasonably estimated. In addition, it must be probable that the loss will be confirmed by some future event. As part of the estimation process, management is required to make assumptions about matters that are by their nature highly uncertain.
The assessment of contingent liabilities, including legal contingencies and income tax liabilities, involves the use of critical estimates, assumptions and judgments. Management's estimates are based on their belief that future events will validate the current assumptions regarding the ultimate outcome of these exposures. However, there can be no assurance that future events, such as court decisions or I.R.S. positions, will not differ from management's assessments. Whenever practicable, management consults with third party experts (attorneys, accountants, claims administrators, etc.) to assist with the gathering and evaluation of information related to contingent liabilities. Based on internally and/or externa lly prepared evaluations, management makes a determination whether the potential exposure requires accrual in the financial statements.
OTHER
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections" (SFAS No. 154), which requires retrospective application of voluntary changes in accounting principle. A change in accounting principle mandated by new accounting pronouncements should follow the transition method specified by the new guidance. However, if transition guidance is not otherwise specified, SFAS No. 154's retrospective application requirement will apply. SFAS No. 154 does not alter the accounting requirement for changes in estimates (prospective) and error corrections (restatement). SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment" (SFAS No. 123-R), which requires recognition of expense over the requisite service period for awards of share-based compensation to employees. Due to SEC action in April 2005, the mandatory adoption date for SFAS No. 123-R was moved to January 1, 2006 with earlier adoption permitted. As permitted by the original SFAS No. 123, FHN has accounted for its equity awards under the provisions of APB No. 25. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the grant date fair value of an award will be used to measure the compensation expense recognized for the award. For unvested awards granted prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the fair values u tilized will equal the values used in preparation of the disclosures required under the original SFAS No. 123. Compensation expense recognized after adoption of SFAS No. 123-R will incorporate an estimate of awards
46
expected to ultimately vest, which requires estimation of forfeitures as well as projections related to the satisfaction of performance conditions that determine vesting. Upon initial adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, FHN is required to reclassify deferred compensation debit balances to capital surplus and to make a cumulative effect entry for outstanding unvested awards that are not expected to vest due to anticipated forfeiture. As permitted by SFAS No. 123-R, FHN intends to retroactively apply the provisions of SFAS No. 123-R to its prior period financial statements. Given the current structure of FHN's compensation program, utilization of the Black-Scholes model and applying management's current interpretation, the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R is estimated t o result in a reduction of 2006 pre-tax income between $12 million and $17 million, which represents $.06 to $.08 per share.
FASB Interpretation No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations" (FIN No. 47) was issued in March 2005. FIN No. 47 requires recognition of a liability at the time of acquisition or construction for assets that will require certain remediation expenditures when the assets are removed from service. FIN No. 47 clarifies that future expenses to remove asbestos from buildings should be estimated and accrued as a liability at the time of acquisition with an offset to increase the cost of the associated structure. FHN currently owns certain buildings that contain asbestos. As a result of adopting No. FIN 47, FHN will increase the value of its recorded tangible assets at the time it recognizes the a ssociated conditional retirement obligation. The retirement liability is accreted through interest expense to the estimated payouts that would be made in the future if settlement of the liability were to occur. Previously, FHN did not accrue any retirement liability for the expected retirement costs on these buildings due to the uncertainty associated with the timing and amount of payment. FIN No. 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal 2005. FHN is currently assessing the financial impact of adopting FIN No. 47.
47
The information called for by this item is contained in (a) Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 2 of Part I of this report, especially the section captioned "Risk Management - Interest Rate Risk Management on page 36, as well as all other portions that discuss interest rates, the interest rate market or environment, and other similar matters; (b) the "Interest Rate Risk Management" subsection of Note 1 included as Item 1 of Part I of the report on page 11 (c) the section entitled "Risk Management - Interest Rate Risk Management" of the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of FHN's 2004 Annual Report to shareholders, and (d) the "Interest Rate Risk Management" subsection of Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in FHN's 2004 Annual Rep ort to shareholders.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. FHN's management, with the participation of FHN's chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of FHN's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that FHN's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to FHN and FHN's consolidated subsidiaries is made known to such officers by others within these entities, particularly during the period this quarterly report was prepared, in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in FHN's internal control over financial reporting during FHN's last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, FHN's internal control over financial reporting.
48
Part II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Items 1, 3, and 5
As of the end of the second quarter 2005, the answers to Items 1, 3, and 5 were either inapplicable or negative, and therefore, these items are omitted.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) None
(b) Not applicable
(c) The Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities Table is incorporated herein by reference to the table included in Item 2 of
Part I - First Horizon National Corporation - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations at page 35.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders.
(a) The Corporation's annual meeting of shareholders was held on April 19, 2005.
(b) Proxies for the annual meeting were solicited in accordance with Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There was no solicitation in opposition to management's three Class III nominees listed in the proxy statement: Simon F. Cooper; James A. Haslam, III; and Mary F. Sammons. All of management's nominees were elected. Eight Class I and Class II directors continued in office: R. Brad Martin; Vicki R. Palmer; William B. Sansom; Jonathan P. Ward; Robert C. Blattberg; J. Kenneth Glass; Michael D. Rose; and Luke Yancy III.
(c) In addition to the election of directors, the shareholders ratified the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditor for the year 2005. The specific shareholder vote related to the election and ratification items is summarized below:
Vote Item | Nominee | For | Withheld | Abstain | Broker Nonvote |
1. Election | Simon F. Cooper | 101,462,789 | 589,152 | 0 | 0 |
of Directors | James A. Haslam, III | 96,197,265 | 5,854,676 | 0 | 0 |
| Mary F. Sammons | 101,048,553 | 1,003,388 | 0 | 0 |
| | | | | |
Vote Item | Auditor | For | Against | Abstain | Broker Nonvote |
2. Ratification of Auditor | KPMG LLP | 100,973,276 | 679,273 | 399,392 | 0 |
(d) Not applicable.
49
Item 6 Exhibits
(a) Exhibits.
Exhibit No. Description
4 Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures.*
10.1(l)** Description of April 19, 2005 amendments to the First Horizon National Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (formerly First Tennessee National Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1(l) to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 25, 2005.
10.3(d)** Form of 2005 PARSAP Agreement (for the CEO), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(d) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.3(e)** Form of 2005 PARSAP Agreement (for executive officers other than the CEO), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(e) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.3(f)** Description of performance criteria related to 2005 PARSAP Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(f) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.5(g)** Form of Stock Option Grant Notice (used for executive officers after 2004), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(g) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.5(h)** Form of Restricted Stock Grant Notice (used after 2004), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(h) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.6(a)** 2002 Management Incentive Plan, as amended April 19, 2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6(a) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.15** 2005 form of change-in-control severance agreement between the registrant and its executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 25, 2005. Messrs. Burkett, Hughes, Baker, and Martin are the executive officers whose bonuses are based on a measure of business unit earnings, as noted in the exhibit. Currently, the "salary amount" referred to in Section 5(iv)(C) for all executive officers is to be "three." |
10.16** Description of compensation arrangements for the registrant's non-employee directors, as revised April 19, 2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 25, 2005.
13 The "Risk Management-Interest Rate Risk Management" subsection of the Management's Discussion and Analysis section and the "Interest Rate Risk Management" subsection of Note 1 to the Corporation's consolidated financial statements, contained, respectively, at pages 23-27 and page 66, in the Corporation's 2004 Annual Report to shareholders, furnished to shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 19, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. Portions of the Annual Report not incorporated herein by reference are deemed not to be "filed" with the Commission.
31(a) Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
31(b) Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
32(a) 18 USC 1350 Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
50
32(b) 18 USC 1350 Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
* The Corporation agrees to furnish copies of the instruments, including indentures, defining the rights of the holders of the long-term debt of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
** This is a management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit.
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION (Registrant) |
|
DATE: 8/05/05 | | | By: | /s/ Marlin L. Mosby III |
| | | | Marlin L. Mosby III |
| | | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
52
Exhibit No. Description
4 Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures.*
10.1(l)** Description of April 19, 2005 amendments to the First Horizon National Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (formerly First Tennessee National Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1(l) to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 25, 2005.
10.3(d)** Form of 2005 PARSAP Agreement (for the CEO), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(d) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.3(e)** Form of 2005 PARSAP Agreement (for executive officers other than the CEO), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(e) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.3(f)** Description of performance criteria related to 2005 PARSAP Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(f) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.5(g)** Form of Stock Option Grant Notice (used for executive officers after 2004), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(g) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.5(h)** Form of Restricted Stock Grant Notice (used after 2004), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(h) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.6(a)** 2002 Management Incentive Plan, as amended April 19, 2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6(a) to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2005.
10.15** 2005 form of change-in-control severance agreement between the registrant and its executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 25, 2005. Messrs. Burkett, Hughes, Baker, and Martin are the executive officers whose bonuses are based on a measure of business unit earnings, as noted in the exhibit. Currently, the "salary amount" referred to in Section 5(iv)(C) for all executive officers is to be "three."
10.16** Description of compensation arrangements for the registrant's non-employee directors, as revised April 19, 2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 25, 2005.
13 The "Risk Management-Interest Rate Risk Management" subsection of the Management's Discussion and Analysis section and the "Interest Rate Risk Management" subsection of Note 1 to the Corporation's consolidated financial statements, contained, respectively, at pages 23-27 and page 66, in the Corporation's 2004 Annual Report to shareholders, furnished to shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 19, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. Portions of the Annual Report not incorporated herein by reference are deemed not to be "filed" with the Commission.
31(a) Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
31(b) Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
32(a) 18 USC 1350 Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
32(b) 18 USC 1350 Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
* The Corporation agrees to furnish copies of the instruments, including indentures, defining the rights of the holders of the long-term debt of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
** This is a management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit.