other financial performance. The foregoing projections and forecasts were prepared solely for internal use in business planning and not with a view toward public disclosure, nor were they prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The summary of these internal financial projections and forecasts is not being included in this Offer to Purchase to influence your decision whether to tender your shares in the Offer, but because these internal financial projections and forecasts were made available by the Company to the Investors.
These internal financial projections and forecasts were based on numerous variables and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and may be beyond the control of the Company’s or Magticom’s management. These assumptions necessarily involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and regulatory conditions and financial market conditions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the Company’s or Magticom’s control. The foregoing internal financial projections and forecasts also reflect assumptions as to certain business decisions that are subject to change. Important factors that may affect actual results and prevent the projected or forecast results from being achieved include, but are not limited to, changes in the telecommunications market or competitive environment, the failure to develop competitive products, factors affecting pricing, equipment malfunctions, the failure to retain key management and technical personnel of the Company or Magticom, adverse reactions to the Offer by customers, suppliers and strategic partners, fluctuations in interest rates, the Company’s financial restatement process, and other risks described in the Company’s report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the projections and forecasts will be realized, and actual results may vary materially from those shown. The inclusion of these internal financial projections and forecasts in this Offer to Purchase should not be regarded as an indication that any of the Company, Parent or Purchaser or their respective affiliates, advisors or representatives considered or consider these internal financial projections and forecasts to be a reliable prediction of future events, and these internal financial projections and forecasts should not be relied upon as such. None of the Company, Parent or Purchaser or their respective affiliates, advisors or representatives can give you any assurance that actual results will not differ from these internal financial projections and forecasts, and none of them undertakes any obligation to update or otherwise revise or reconcile the internal financial projections or forecasts to reflect circumstances existing after the date such internal financial projections or forecasts were generated or to reflect the occurrence of future events even in the event that any or all of the assumptions underlying these projections and forecasts are shown to be in error. None of Parent nor Purchaser, nor, to the knowledge of Parent or Purchaser, the Company, intends to make publicly available any update or other revisions to these internal financial projections or forecasts. None of the Company, Parent or Purchaser or their respective affiliates, advisors or representatives has made or makes any
representation to any person regarding the ultimate performance of the Company compared to the information contained in these internal financial projections or forecasts or that forecasted results will be achieved. The Company has made no representation to Parent or Purchaser, in the Merger Agreement or otherwise, concerning these internal financial projections or forecasts.
Late Filings and Delisting of the Shares.As described in the Company’s public announcements and filings with the SEC, the Company was unable to timely file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the “2004 Form 10-K”). The 2004 Form 10-K included restatements of previously filed financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, and the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004, respectively. The 2004 Form 10-K was filed with the SEC on December 14, 2006. In addition, the Company has been unable to timely file with the SEC its Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004, September 30, 2004, March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005, September 30, 2005, March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006, September 30, 2006 and March 31, 2007, respectively.
The Company’s common stock and preferred stock were delisted from the American Stock Exchange on March 3, 2003. During the period from March 3, 2003 to September 23, 2003, the Company’s equity securities were quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board trading system (the “OTCBB”). On September 24, 2003, the Company’s equity securities were removed from quotation on the OTCBB trading system due to the Company’s failure to comply with NASD Rule 6530, pursuant to which the Company was required to keep current with the SEC periodic report filing requirements. As a result, the Company’s common stock and preferred stock are currently traded only by means of the “Pink Sheets.”
Because the Company has not filed periodic reports for the periods following the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, the Company is not in compliance with its reporting obligations under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. On April 17, 2007, the Company received a letter from the SEC informing the Company that, unless the Company filed all required periodic reports within fifteen days from the date of the SEC letter, the Company might be subject, without further notice, to an administrative proceeding under Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act to revoke the registration of the Company’s securities under the Exchange Act. If the Company’s equity securities were deregistered under the Exchange Act, all public trading in the Common Shares and the Preferred Shares, including the trading on the Pink Sheets, would immediately cease.
Certain Contemplated Transactions.In connection with the due diligence investigation of the Company conducted by the Investors and their representatives in connection with the Merger Agreement, representatives of the Company have advised the
41
Investors and their representatives that representatives of Magticom have engaged in preliminary discussions with third parties regarding proposed acquisitions of several business ventures in the Republic of Georgia. According to the Company, these discussions are continuing and have not resulted in any agreements or understandings, whether definitive or preliminary, with respect to any such transactions.
| |
9. | CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING PARENT, PURCHASER AND THEIR AFFILIATES |
Parent is a British Virgin Islands limited partnership organized on June 20, 2007, with principal executive offices located at c/o Salford, Norfolk House, 31 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4JJ, United Kingdom. The telephone number of the principal executive offices of Parent is (+44 20) 7004 7900. Parent is a holding company affiliated with (i) Salford Georgia (“Salford Georgia”), the local Georgian office of Salford Capital Partners Inc. (“Salford Capital”), an international private equity and investment management firm based in the British Virgin Islands, and (ii) Compound Capital Limited (“Compound”), an international private investment firm based in Bermuda. Compound is a subsidiary of Sun Capital Partners Ltd., a U.K. based private investment firm. Sun Capital Partners Ltd. is not affiliated with, and has no relationship to, the U.S.-based private investment firm Sun Capital Partners, Inc. Salford Georgia and Compound are collectively referred to as the “Investors” in this Offer to Purchase.
Purchaser is a Delaware corporation incorporated on June 27, 2007, with principal executive offices located at c/o Salford, Norfolk House, 31 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4JJ, United Kingdom. The telephone number of the principal executive offices of Purchaser is (+44 20) 7004 7900. Purchaser is a direct and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent.
Each of Parent and Purchaser was formed solely for the purpose of acquiring the Company. To date, neither Parent nor Purchaser has engaged in any activities other than activities incidental to its formation and the commencement of the Offer.
The name, business address and telephone number, citizenship, present principal occupation and employment history of each of the directors, executive officers and control persons of Purchaser and Parent are set forth inSchedule I hereto. Neither Purchaser nor Parent nor, to the best of their knowledge, any of the persons listed inSchedule I hereto has, during the past five years, been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors). Neither Purchaser nor Parent nor, to the best of their knowledge, any of the persons listed inSchedule I hereto has, during the past five years, been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding (except for matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement) that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting
42
activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws.
Except as set forth elsewhere in this Offer to Purchase (includingSchedule I hereto), (i) neither Purchaser nor Parent nor, to the knowledge of Purchaser or Parent, any of the persons listed inSchedule I hereto, beneficially owns or has a right to acquire any Shares or any other equity securities of the Company, and (ii) neither Purchaser nor Parent nor, to the knowledge of Purchaser or Parent, any of the persons or entities referred to in clause (i) above or any of their executive officers, directors or subsidiaries, has effected any transaction in the Shares or any other equity securities of the Company during the past 60 days.
Except as set forth elsewhere in this Offer to Purchase (includingSchedule I hereto), (i) neither Purchaser nor Parent nor, to the knowledge of Purchaser or Parent, any of the persons listed inSchedule I hereto, has any contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship with any other person with respect to any securities of the Company and (ii) during the two years prior to the date of this Offer to Purchase, there have been no transactions that would require reporting under the rules and regulations of the SEC between Purchaser, Parent, any of their affiliates or, to the knowledge of Purchaser or Parent, any of the persons listed inSchedule I hereto, on the one hand, and the Company or any of its executive officers, directors and/or affiliates, on the other hand.
Except as described in Section 11 entitled “Background of the Offer; Contacts with the Company” of this Offer to Purchase, during the two years prior to the date of this Offer to Purchase, there have been no contracts, negotiations or transactions between Purchaser, Parent, any of their affiliates or, to the knowledge of Purchaser or Parent, any of the persons listed inSchedule I hereto, on the one hand, and the Company or its affiliates, on the other hand, concerning a merger, consolidation or acquisition, a tender offer or other acquisition of securities, an election of directors or a sale or other transfer of a material amount of assets.
| |
10. | SOURCE AND AMOUNT OF FUNDS |
Purchaser expects that approximately $200 million will be required to consummate the Offer and the Merger and to pay related fees and expenses. Purchaser expects to fund the purchase price and related fees and expenses with funds provided by the Investors to Parent.
Affiliates of each of Salford Georgia and of Compound have entered into commitment letters to provide equity contributions to Parent, in cash in immediately available funds, in an aggregate amount of up to $200 million. The proceeds received by Parent from such equity contributions will be used solely for the purpose of funding the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including (i) subject to the
43
satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the Offer, the purchase price of the Common Shares that Purchaser becomes obligated to purchase pursuant to the Offer and (ii) subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the Merger, the Merger Consideration. The funding of the equity commitments and the issuance of the equity securities of Parent to the Investors will occur on the date Purchaser accepts for payment Common Shares tendered and not withdrawn pursuant to the Offer (to the extent of the Offer Price with respect to such Common Shares) and, if applicable, the closing date of the Merger (to the extent of the Merger Consideration). Immediately upon the funding of the equity commitments, Parent is expected to contribute to Purchaser amounts sufficient to fund the Offer Price with respect to the Common Shares that Purchaser becomes obligated to purchase pursuant to the Offer and, if applicable, the Merger Consideration.
The aggregate proceeds contemplated by the equity commitments are expected to be sufficient for Parent and Purchaser to pay the consideration contemplated by the Offer and, if applicable, the Merger and to pay all related transaction fees and expenses on the terms contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Each of the parties that have executed the equity commitments has access to sufficient cash to satisfy its obligations under its equity commitment. Parent and Purchaser do not anticipate the need to seek alternate or additional sources of funding. Consummation of the Offer, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement is not conditioned upon any financing arrangements.
| |
11. | BACKGROUND OF THE OFFER; CONTACTS WITH THE COMPANY |
The information set forth below regarding the Company was provided by the Company. None of Purchaser, Parent or any of their affiliates takes any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any information regarding meetings or discussions in which the Investors or their affiliates did not participate.
Background of the Transaction. Our affiliate, Salford Capital Partners Inc. (“Salford Capital”), is an international private equity and investment management firm that invests in a wide range of sectors, including telecommunications companies around the world. Salford Capital regularly evaluates investment opportunities in order to enhance and diversify its investment portfolio.
In July 2006, the Company consummated a series of transactions associated with its then 81% indirect ownership interest in Telecom Georgia, a long-distance transit operator located in Tbilisi, Georgia. In summary, the Company acquired from Strikland Investments, Inc. (“Strikland”) and Greatbay Investments, Ltd. (“Greatbay”), international business companies organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands, a controlling interest in Telenet, a Georgian company providing internet access, data communication, voice telephony and international access services, in exchange for cash
44
and an indirect minority interest in Telecom Georgia. Salford Capital acted on behalf of each of Strikland and Greatbay in connection with these transactions. At approximately the same time, the Company sold to Dr. Jokhtaberidze, the Company’s principal partner in Magticom, an indirect minority interest in the Company’s ownership in Telenet and Telecom Georgia.
Following these transactions, the Company held, through U.S.-based holding companies in which the Company has the controlling interest, a 25.6% equity interest in each of Telecom Georgia and Telenet. In connection with these transactions, the parties entered into an Option Agreement, dated May 19, 2006 (the “Option Agreement”), among Strikland, Greatbay and Metromedia Georgia Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, pursuant to which, among other things, the Company granted to Strikland and Greatbay the right to compel the Company to purchase their membership interests in International Telcell, LLC (“International Telcell”), a Delaware limited liability company that is the direct parent company of each of Telecom Georgia and Telenet.
In August 2006, Mark S. Hauf, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, arranged for representatives of Salford Georgia, the local Georgian office of Salford Capital, to meet with representatives of Emergent Telecom Ventures S.A. (“Emergent”), a communications merchant banking group that was previously involved in the acquisition in August 2005 of the Company’s interest in ZAO PeterStar, the leading competitive local exchange carrier in St. Petersburg, Russia, and Etisalat (“Etisalat”), a UAE based telecommunications company, to discuss a possible acquisition of the Company’s assets in Georgia. At the meeting, Salford Georgia was invited to participate in a consortium with Emergent and Etisalat to acquire the Company’s assets in Georgia (including Magticom).
After preliminary discussions with the Company and Magticom, Etisalat withdrew from the negotiations in early September 2006. Shortly thereafter, Istithmar (“Istithmar”), a Dubai based private equity group, entered into discussions with Emergent and Salford Georgia to participate in a transaction to acquire the Company’s assets in Georgia. Around that time, a bidder consortium (the “2006 Group”) consisting of Emergent, Istithmar and Salford Georgia was formed.
On September 28, 2006, the 2006 Group executed a letter of intent (the “2006 LOI”) with the Company in respect of the 2006 Group’s proposal to acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of Metromedia International Telecommunications, Inc. (“MITI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which represented substantially all of the Company’s assets, for an aggregate purchase price of $480 million in cash. The 2006 LOI provided for a 60-day exclusivity period, during which the 2006 Group would conduct due diligence and the parties would negotiate a binding purchase agreement, and set forth certain terms proposed to be contained in such a purchase agreement. Among other things, the 2006 LOI contemplated that the sale of MITI to the 2006 Group would be effected by means of a court supervised auction conducted in accordance with Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in a case proposed to be filed by the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
45
In October 2006, certain common stockholders of the Company filed a legal action in the Delaware Court of Chancery, seeking to enjoin the Company and its directors and officers from entering into an agreement to sell all or substantially all assets of the Company prior to a court-ordered annual meeting of stockholders of the Company, which the Company had agreed to hold on December 15, 2006, as well as to compel the Company and its directors and officers to comply with the provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law that require a stockholder approval for the sale of all or substantially all assets of a Delaware corporation. On November 29, 2006, the court issued an order pursuant to which the Company was ordered to comply with the stockholder approval requirement in connection with any agreement for the sale of all or substantially all assets of the Company.
During the course of negotiations to acquire MITI and the pendency of the legal action in the Delaware Court of Chancery, Istithmar and Emergent withdrew from the 2006 Group on October 24, 2006 and November 16, 2006, respectively. All of their respective interests in the 2006 LOI were assigned to Salford Georgia.
On December 5, 2006, Salford Capital sent a letter to the Company in which it informed the Company that it had decided not to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the 2006 LOI and to terminate the 2006 LOI due to an alleged material breach by the Company of the “access to information” covenant contained in the 2006 LOI. In the letter, Salford Capital requested that the Company reimburse Salford Capital for the transaction expenses incurred by it in connection with the proposed transaction, in the aggregate amount of $1,010,000.
On December 8, 2006, Salford Georgia presented the Company with a written revised offer to acquire MITI for $331,000,000. By letter dated December 14, 2006, the Company rejected Salford Georgia’s revised proposal as well as Salford Capital’s claim for expense reimbursement.
See Item 1 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for more information concerning the 2006 LOI and the transactions contemplated thereby.
On December 12, 2006, Mr. Hauf met with a representative of Salford Georgia to inquire as to the maximum amount Salford Georgia would be willing to pay to acquire the Company’s business interests in the country of Georgia, assuming there were no procedural obstacles (relating to the delay in the Company’s finalization of its outstanding financial statements or otherwise) to such a purchase. Mr. Hauf also asked whether Salford Georgia would consider acquiring the Company itself rather than its assets and on what terms, suggesting by way of example a tender offer for the Company’s securities or undertaking a merger with the Company in which one or both classes of the Company’s stock would be cashed out.
46
On December 14, 2006, a representative of Salford Georgia spoke with Mr. Hauf and told him that Salford was unwilling to make an offer to acquire the Company’s business interests in Georgia at any a price materially greater than $331 million. Such representative also indicated that Salford was considering making a tender offer for the common stock of the Company, at a price equivalent to what the Company’s common stockholders would have received in the transactions contemplated by the 2006 LOI, followed by a merger in which the remaining Common Shares would be cashed out, and the Preferred Shares would remain outstanding. These discussions with Mr. Hauf continued at various times in January and February 2007.
On December 21, 2006, Salford issued a press release stating that, based on a thorough review by Salford of the assets to be sold pursuant to the 2006 LOI and based on other associated events and issues over the prior two month period, Salford had made a revised offer to purchase MITI for $331 million.
During the period from mid-December 2006 to February 2007, two meetings and a number of telephone conversations took place between representatives of Salford Georgia and a representative of Cadence Capital (“Cadence”), a shareholder of the Company. Cadence had contacted Salford regarding its possible interest in participating in a transaction involving the Company. An introductory meeting took place in London on December 12, 2006, and a follow-up meeting took place in New York on January 29, 2007. At the second meeting, the representative of Cadence verbally proposed that Salford Georgia support Cadence in a bid for the Company. No agreements were reached at either of these two meetings. Cadence subsequently contacted Salford Georgia on two occasions to express its interest in working together to acquire the Company, but Salford Georgia declined such collaboration.
On January 10, 2007, a representative of Salford Georgia met with Mr. Hauf, at Salford’s request, to discuss Salford’s further intentions regarding the Company’s business interests in the country of Georgia. Such representative informed Mr. Hauf that Salford Georgia remained interested in acquiring the Company’s interests in Georgia, but was now considering making a proposal to acquire a majority of the common stock of the Company.
On January 30, 2007, representatives of Salford Georgia met with Mr. Stuart Subotnick, a director and significant shareholder of the Company, to discuss a transaction involving the Company. No specific agreements or understandings were reached at that meeting.
On February 12, 2007, a representative of Salford Georgia spoke with Mr. Hauf and confirmed Salford Georgia’s intention to propose a tender offer for the common stock of the Company and to engage U.S. counsel to advise Salford Georgia in connection with such a transaction. This conversation was limited to a general discussion of Salford Georgia’s interest in proceeding by means of a tender offer, and the
47
representative of Salford Georgia made no definitive statements as to the price Salford Georgia was prepared to pay or any other material details.
On February 14, 2007, a representative of Salford Georgia again spoke with Mr. Hauf about Salford Georgia’s intentions to propose a tender offer for the common stock of the Company. Mr. Rukhadze proposed a meeting between representatives of Salford Georgia and the Company during the following week to negotiate the terms of a potential transaction, including the price to be offered to holders of Common Shares in a tender offer and Salford Georgia’s intentions for the Company after completion of the tender offer.
On February 22, 2007, representatives of Salford Georgia met with the Company’s negotiating committee, which consisted of Mr. Hauf, Mr. Subotnick, Wayne Henderson and James M. Dubin. At the meeting, the parties agreed to commence negotiations of a transaction pursuant to which Salford Georgia and its affiliates would acquire at least a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, at a purchase price of $1.80 per share in cash, subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence and agreement on definitive documentation.
In mid-March 2007, Salford commenced discussions with Sun Capital Partners Ltd. (“Sun Capital”), a U.K.-based private investment firm (not affiliated with and having no relationship to the U.S.-based private equity firm Sun Capital Partners Inc.), regarding the possible participation of Sun Capital or its affiliates in the proposed acquisition of the Company.
On March 20, 2007, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (“Debevoise”), Salford Georgia’s legal advisers, spoke with Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (“Paul Weiss”), the Company’s legal advisers, regarding potential methods of structuring a tender offer transaction and other related issues.
On April 10, 2007, Salford Georgia entered into a confidentiality agreement with the Company in connection with the proposed transaction. Shortly thereafter, Salford Georgia commenced its due diligence investigation of the Company.
Also on April 10, 2007, Strikland and Greatbay gave a written notice to IT Georgia Holdings, LLC (“IT Georgia Holdings”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company and the successor in interest to Metromedia Georgia Holdings, Inc., of their intention to exercise the option to compel IT Georgia Holdings to purchase their respective 24.5% membership interests in International Telcell, for an aggregate cash price of $7,500,000, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Option Agreement. On April 16, 2007, at the request of the Company, Strikland and Greatbay revoked their exercise of the put option. Salford Capital acted on behalf of each of Strikland and Greatbay in connection with the put option exercise notice.
48
In mid-April 2007, representatives of Salford Georgia met with Mr. William F. Harley, III, a director of the Company at that time and Co-Portfolio Manager and Chief Investment Officer of Fursa Alternative Strategies LLC (f/k/a Mellon HBV), a significant shareholder of the Company. Mr. Harley had previously indicated that his company might be interested in participating in a transaction involving the Company. No agreements or understandings were reached during the meeting, and no further discussions took place between Mr. Harley and representatives of Salford Georgia or any of the Investors regarding a transaction involving the Company.
On May 10, 2007, Strikland and Greatbay again gave a written notice to the Company and IT Georgia Holdings of exercise by each of them of the option to compel IT Georgia Holdings to purchase their respective 24.5% membership interests in International Telcell, for an aggregate cash price of $7,500,000, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Option Agreement. Salford Capital again acted on behalf of each of Strikland and Greatbay in connection with the put option exercise notice.
On or around May 10, 2007, Salford requested that the Company permit Salford to join together with Sun Capital in considering a potential transaction with the Company. On May 11, 2007, Sun Capital entered into a confidentiality agreement with the Company and began participating in the due diligence investigation of the Company conducted by Salford Georgia. Subsequently, Sun Capital informed the Company that it intended to participate in the proposed transaction through Compound, a private investment firm based in Bermuda and a wholly owned subsidiary of Sun Capital. On June 27, the Company, Sun Capital and Compound executed a letter agreement pursuant to which the Company permitted Sun Capital to share with Compound confidential information about the Company and Compound agreed to be bound by the terms of the confidentiality agreement between Sun Capital and the Company.
On May 24, 2007, Debevoise sent a draft of the Merger Agreement to Paul Weiss. The draft Merger Agreement provided for a tender offer by Purchaser for all of the issued and outstanding Common Shares of the Company, at a price of $1.80 per share, to be followed by a “back-end” merger at the same price. On May 25, 2007, Debevoise also sent to Paul Weiss a draft Tender and Support Agreement (the “Support Agreement”) to be entered into by Parent, Purchaser and certain holders of Common Shares concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement.
On May 30, 2007, IT Georgia Holdings, LLC purchased from each of Strikland and Greatbay their respective 24.5% membership interests in International Telcell, for a cash price of $7,500,000, in connection with the exercise by Strikland and Greatbay of their put option with respect to such membership interests under the Option Agreement. Salford Capital acted on behalf of each of Strikland and Greatbay in connection with the Option Agreement and the put option exercise.
49
On June 5, 2007, the parties and their legal advisers met to discuss the terms of the Merger Agreement and the Support Agreement.
On June 13, 2007, a representative of the Investors contacted the Company’s senior management to update the Company on the Investors’ intentions to work toward finalizing the Merger Agreement and the Support Agreement and completing their due diligence by the end of June or early July 2007 so as to be in the position to launch the proposed tender offer in early July 2007.
During the period from June 15 to July 17, 2007, the parties and their respective legal advisors negotiated and finalized the Merger Agreement, the Support Agreement and ancillary transaction documents, the Investors completed their due diligence, Parent prepared drafts of the offering documents for the Offer, and Parent and the Investors obtained the letter of credit required by the Merger Agreement and finalized the banking arrangements necessary to consummate the Offer.
On July 13, 2007, the board of directors of the Company met and approved the Merger Agreement, the Offer, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and later that same day Parent, Merger Sub and the Company entered into the Merger Agreement.
| |
12. | PURPOSE OF THE OFFER; PLANS FOR THE COMPANY |
Purpose. The purpose of the Offer and the Merger is for Parent, through Purchaser, to acquire control of, and the entire common equity interest in, the Company. The purpose of the Merger is for Purchaser to acquire all Common Shares not purchased pursuant to the Offer. If the Offer is successful, Purchaser and Parent intend to consummate the Merger as promptly thereafter as practicable. The Offer is being made pursuant to the Merger Agreement.
Stockholders of the Company who sell their Common Shares in the Offer will cease to have any equity interest in the Company or any right to participate in its earnings and future growth. If the Merger is consummated, non-tendering holders of Common Shares also will no longer have an equity interest in the Company. On the other hand, after selling their Common Shares in the Offer or the subsequent Merger, stockholders of the Company will not bear the risk of any decrease in the value of the Company.
Approval. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), the approval of the board of directors of the Company and the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Common Shares may be required to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger. The board of directors of the Company has approved and adopted the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby and, unless the Merger is
50
consummated pursuant to the short-form merger provisions under the DGCL described below, the only remaining required corporate action of the Company is the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Common Shares.
Short-Form Merger. Under Section 253 of the DGCL, if a corporation owns at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each class of a subsidiary corporation that, absent the procedure for a short-form merger under Section 253 of the DGCL, would be entitled to vote on a merger, the corporation holding such stock may merge such subsidiary into itself or itself into such subsidiary, without any action or vote on the part of the board of directors or stockholders of such other corporation. If Purchaser acquires, pursuant to the Offer, the exercise of the Top-Up Option or otherwise, at least 90% of the outstanding Common Shares, Parent and Purchaser will be able to effect, and will be required to effect, the Merger without a vote of the Company’s stockholders.
Stockholder Meeting. In the Merger Agreement, the Company has agreed, if a stockholder vote is required, to convene a meeting of its stockholders following consummation of the Offer for the purpose of considering and voting on the Merger. The Company, acting through its board of directors, has further agreed that if a stockholders’ meeting is convened, the Company’s board of directors will recommend that stockholders of the Company vote to approve the Merger. At any such meeting, all of the Shares then owned by Purchaser, Parent or any of their affiliates, and all Shares for which the Company has received proxies to vote, will be voted in favor of the Merger.
Board Representation. Assuming Purchaser purchases a majority of the Common Shares pursuant to the Offer, Parent is entitled to exercise its rights under the Merger Agreement to obtain pro rata representation on, and control of, the boards of directors of the Company and its subsidiaries. Parent currently intends to designate Messrs. Peter Nagle, Irakli Rukhadze, Jamal Khan, William Alan McIntosh and Graydon Philip Bellingan to serve as directors of the Company following the consummation of the Offer. Parent expects that such representation would permit Parent to exert substantial influence over the Company’s conduct of its business and operations. See Section 13 entitled “Transaction Documents” of this Offer to Purchase.
Rule 13e-3. The SEC has adopted Rule 13e-3 under the Exchange Act, which is applicable to certain “going private” transactions and which may under certain circumstances be applicable to the Merger or another business combination following the purchase of Shares pursuant to the Offer or otherwise in which Purchaser seeks to acquire the remaining Shares not held by it. If applicable, Rule 13e-3 requires, among other things, that certain financial information concerning the Company and certain information relating to the fairness of the proposed transaction and the consideration offered to minority stockholders in such transaction be filed with the SEC and disclosed to stockholders prior to consummation of the transaction. Purchaser and Parent believe, however, that Rule 13e-3 will not be applicable to the Merger if the Merger is
51
consummated within one year after the Acceptance Date at the same per share price as paid in the Offer.
Plans for the Company. Except as otherwise described in this Section 12, it is expected that, following the Merger, the business and operations of the Company will be continued substantially as they are conducted currently. Parent will continue to conduct a detailed review of the Company and its assets, corporate structure, capitalization, operations, properties, policies, management and personnel during the pendency of the Offer. After the consummation of the Offer and the Merger, Parent will take such actions as it deems appropriate in light of the circumstances that then exist.
Extraordinary Corporate Transactions.Except as otherwise described in this Section 12, neither Purchaser nor Parent has any present plans or proposals that would result in an extraordinary corporate transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries, such as a merger, reorganization, liquidation, relocation of operations, or sale or transfer of a material amount of assets, or any material changes in the Company’s capitalization, corporate structure, business or composition of its management or board of directors. Parent is currently evaluating ways to minimize the ongoing costs of the Company’s operations, and expects that following the consummation of the Offer it will cause the Company to dispose of any remaining “non-core” assets and to further reduce the size and costs of the Company’s administrative operations, particularly in the United States. In addition, Parent is in the process of reviewing steps it can take following the consummation of the Merger in order to limit the extent to which any future appreciation in the value of the Company’s non-U.S. assets are subject to U.S. taxation. Such review may result in proposals for the sale of a portion of Company’s interests in its non-U.S. assets or other extraordinary corporate transactions.
The Merger Agreement.
The following is a summary of certain provisions of the Merger Agreement. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference and a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO that Parent and Purchaser have filed with the SEC (the “Schedule TO”). The Merger Agreement may be examined and copies may be obtained in the manner set forth under “Available Information” in Section 8 entitled “Certain Information Concerning the Company” of this Offer to Purchase.
The description of the Merger Agreement has been included to provide you with information regarding its terms. The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties made by and to the Company, Parent and Purchaser as of specific dates. The statements embodied in those representations and warranties were made for purposes of
52
that contract among the parties and are subject to qualifications and limitations agreed by the parties in connection with negotiating the terms of that contract.
The Offer. The Merger Agreement provides that Purchaser will commence the Offer not later than July 20, 2007. The Offer will be conducted on the terms and subject to the conditions described in Section 1 entitled “Terms of the Offer” and Section 14 entitled “Certain Conditions of the Offer” of this Offer to Purchase.
Recommendation. The Company has represented in the Merger Agreement that its board of directors has (i) determined that the terms of the Offer, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are fair and declared it advisable to enter into the Merger Agreement, (ii) approved the execution, delivery and performance of the Merger Agreement and the consummation of the Offer, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby and (iii) recommended that the stockholders of the Company accept the Offer and tender their Common Shares in the Offer and, to the extent applicable, approve and adopt the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby (the “Recommendation”).
The Company has agreed to file with the SEC a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 (the “Schedule 14D-9”) that will comply in all material respects with the provisions of all applicable Federal securities laws. The Company has also agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to disseminate the Schedule 14D-9 to the stockholders of the Company, together with this Offer to Purchase and other related documents, reasonably promptly after the commencement of the Offer and, to the extent practicable, to cooperate with Parent and Purchaser in mailing or otherwise disseminating the Schedule 14D-9 with the Schedule TO and other appropriate documents relating to the Offer to the holders of Common Shares.
Directors. The Merger Agreement provides that, after Purchaser has purchased at least a majority of the Common Shares, Parent will be entitled to designate a number of directors of the Company that is equal to the product of the total number of directors of the Company (including the directors designated by Parent, current directors serving as officers of the Company and the directors, if any, designated by the holders of the Preferred Shares) multiplied by the percentage that the aggregate number of Common Shares beneficially owned by Parent or any affiliate of Parent bears to the number of Common Shares outstanding. In the event that Parent’s designees are elected or appointed to the Company’s board of directors, the Company’s board of directors will continue to include any directors that the holders of the Preferred Shares are entitled to elect pursuant to the certificate of designation. In addition, until the Effective Time (as defined below), the Company’s board of directors will have at least two directors (in addition to any directors that the holders of the Preferred Shares are entitled to elect pursuant to the certificate of designation) who are directors of the Company on the date of the Merger Agreement and who are neither officers of the Company nor designees, stockholders, affiliates or associates of Parent.
53
Top-Up Option. Subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Company has granted to Purchaser an irrevocable option (the “Top-Up Option”) to purchase a number of Common Shares (the “Top-Up Option Shares”) that, when added to the number of Common Shares owned by Parent or Purchaser or any wholly owned subsidiary of Parent or Purchaser at the time of exercise of the Top-Up Option, constitutes one Common Share more than 90% of the number of Common Shares that will be issued and outstanding immediately after the issuance of the Top-Up Option Shares, provided that the aggregate number of Top-Up Option Shares may not exceed the aggregate number of the Company’s then authorized but unissued Common Shares. The Top-Up Option may be exercised by Purchaser within five business days after the expiration of the Offer (including any subsequent offering period, if one is made available), subject to certain conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. The purchase price of the Top-Up Option Shares will be equal to the Offer Price. The purchase price for the Top-Up Option Shares attributable to the par value of each of the Top-Up Option Shares will be payable by Purchaser to the Company in cash, and the balance of the aggregate purchase price payable for the Top-Up Option Shares may be paid by Purchaser, at its option, either in cash or by executing and delivering to the Company a promissory note having a principal amount equal to the balance of the aggregate purchase price for the Top-Up Option Shares. The promissory note will be canceled upon the closing of the Merger. The Top-Up Option is intended to expedite the timing of the completion of the Merger by permitting the Merger to occur pursuant to Delaware’s short-form merger statute at a time when the approval of the Merger at a meeting of the Company’s stockholders would be assured because of Purchaser’s ownership of a majority of outstanding Shares following completion of the Offer.
Effective Time; Structure; Effects. On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in Merger Agreement, and in accordance with the DGCL, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), Purchaser will merge with and into the Company, whereupon the separate corporate existence of Purchaser will cease, and the Company will continue its corporate existence under Delaware law as the surviving corporation in the Merger and a subsidiary of Parent.
The closing of the Merger will take place on the third business day after the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the closing set forth in the Merger Agreement (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the closing), or at such other place, date and time as the Company and Parent may agree in writing.
The Company has agreed to cause a certificate of merger to be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on the closing date of the Merger. The Merger will become effective at such time as the certificate of merger has been filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, or at such later date or time as may be agreed by the Company and Purchaser in writing and specified in the certificate of merger in accordance with the DGCL.
54
If, following the date on which Purchaser accepts Common Shares for payment in the Offer (the “Acceptance Date”), the expiration of any subsequent offering period or the closing of the purchase of the Top-Up Option Shares, Parent or any direct or indirect subsidiary of Parent owns at least 90% of the outstanding Common Shares, the parties to the Merger Agreement, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, have agreed to take all necessary and appropriate action to cause the Merger to become effective as soon as practicable thereafter, without a meeting of stockholders of the Company, in accordance with Section 253 of the DGCL.
Conversion of Securities. At the Effective Time, each Common Share outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than (A) any Common Shares owned, directly or indirectly, by Parent or Purchaser or held by the Company, in each case immediately prior to the Effective Time, and (B) any Common Shares held by holders who have demanded and perfected their right to dissent from the Merger and have validly exercised dissenters’ rights of appraisal with respect to such Common Shares) will be canceled and will automatically be converted into the right to receive in cash an amount per share equal to the Offer Price (the “Merger Consideration”), without interest thereon, upon surrender of the certificate representing such Common Shares.
Preferred Shares. Each Preferred Share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will remain outstanding immediately following the Effective Time and will automatically become one share of 7.25% cumulative convertible preferred stock of the surviving corporation, having the rights and preferences set forth in the Certificate of Designation (including with respect to all unpaid accumulated and accrued dividends on such Preferred Share).
Stock Options. Each option to purchase Common Shares, whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will at the Effective Time be canceled, and the holder of such option will receive from the surviving corporation an amount (subject to any applicable withholding tax) in cash equal to the product of (x) the excess, if any, of the Merger Consideration over the exercise price per share of such option multiplied by (y) the total number of Common Shares subject to such option. If the exercise price per share of any Company stock option outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time equals or exceeds the Merger Consideration, then such option will be canceled at the Effective Time and will be of no further force and effect, and no consideration will be payable in respect to such Company stock option.
Restricted Shares. The Merger Agreement provides that, in connection with the Merger, as of immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, any restrictions with respect to outstanding restricted Common Shares shall terminate or lapse. Upon the termination or lapse of such restrictions, such restricted Common Shares will be outstanding Common Shares and will be converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration in accordance with the Merger Agreement.
55
Representations and Warranties. The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties made by the Company to Purchaser and Parent, and representations and warranties made by Purchaser and Parent to the Company, and may be subject to important limitations and qualifications agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating the terms of the Merger Agreement. In particular, the representations and warranties that the Company made are qualified by certain information that the Company filed with the SEC, as well as by confidential disclosure schedules that the Company delivered to Purchaser and Parent concurrently with the signing of the Merger Agreement. In addition, certain representations and warranties were made as of a specified date, may be subject to contractual standards of materiality different from those generally applicable to public disclosures to stockholders, or may have been used for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties rather than establishing matters of fact. For the foregoing reasons, you should not rely on the representations and warranties contained in the Merger Agreement as statements of factual information.
The Company’s representations and warranties relate to, among other things, the following matters:
| | |
| • | the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ proper organization, good standing and qualification to do business; |
| | |
| • | the Company’s capitalization, including in particular the number of Common Shares (including restricted Common Shares), Preferred Shares, stock options, warrants and other equity-based interests; |
| | |
| • | the Company’s significant subsidiaries and the Company’s equity interests in such subsidiaries; |
| | |
| • | the Company’s corporate power and authority to enter into the Merger Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; |
| | |
| • | the enforceability of the Merger Agreement as against the Company; |
| | |
| • | the required consents and approvals of governmental entities and other third parties in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; |
| | |
| • | the absence of violations of or conflicts with the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ governing documents, applicable law or certain agreements as a result of entering into the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; |
56
| | |
| • | the timeliness and compliance with requirements of the Company’s SEC filings since December 14, 2006, including the accuracy and compliance with requirements of the financial statements contained therein; |
| | |
| • | the consolidated financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries, including certain financial statements; |
| | |
| • | the absence of outstanding indebtedness (other than intercompany loans among the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries or among the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries); |
| | |
| • | the absence of undisclosed liabilities; |
| | |
| • | compliance with applicable legal requirements and permits; |
| | |
| • | environmental matters; |
| | |
| • | matters relating to employee benefit plans; |
| | |
| • | the absence of certain changes since December 31, 2004; |
| | |
| • | legal proceedings and governmental orders; |
| | |
| • | tax matters; |
| | |
| • | employment and labor matters affecting the Company or its subsidiaries; |
| | |
| • | intellectual property; |
| | |
| • | real property; |
| | |
| • | material contracts and performance of obligations thereunder; |
| | |
| • | absence of certain interested-party transactions and undisclosed interests of the Company’s officers and directors; |
| | |
| • | insurance; |
| | |
| • | accuracy and compliance with applicable securities law of the information supplied by the Company for inclusion in filings made with the SEC in connection with the Merger, the Offer and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; |
57
| | |
| • | the possible required vote of the Company’s stockholders that may be required to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and to approve the Merger in circumstances where a short-form merger is not possible; |
| | |
| • | the receipt by the Company of an opinion from Evercore Group L.L.C., the Company’s financial adviser, as to the fairness of the Offer and the Merger to holders of the Common Shares from a financial point of view; and |
| | |
| • | absence of undisclosed brokers’ fees. |
Many of the Company’s representations and warranties are qualified by a “Company Material Adverse Effect” standard. For the purposes of the Merger Agreement, “Company Material Adverse Effect” means any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect, condition or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate with all other facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects, conditions or occurrences, is materially adverse to the business, properties, assets, liabilities, results of operation or condition (financial or otherwise) of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or the ability of the Company to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. However, “Company Material Adverse Effect” excludes any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect, condition or occurrence resulting from, arising out of or relating to:
| |
• | any change in interest rates or general economic conditions in the industries or markets in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries operates, unless such change has a materially disproportionate effect on the business and operations of the Company or any of its subsidiaries; |
| |
• | any adverse change in the stock price of the Company in and of itself; |
| |
• | any change in or interpretations of United States generally accepted accounting principles or applicable law; |
| |
• | any natural disaster or act of God; |
| |
• | compliance with the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement or from the announcement or pendency of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; |
| |
• | an outbreak or escalation of hostilities, acts of terrorism, political instability or other national or international calamity, crisis or emergency, or any governmental or other response to any such event, whether or not involving the United States, the country of Georgia or any country constituting a part of the Commonwealth of Independent States; |
58
| |
• | any pending or threatened claim, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to the existence of the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; |
| |
• | the failure of the Company to file its periodic reports with the SEC for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 and any subsequent period; |
| |
• | the inability of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to receive an opinion relating to their financial statements from their respective independent outside accountants for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2005 and any prior or subsequent period; or |
| |
• | any disclosure in the Company Disclosure Letter. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action or proceeding initiated by any governmental entity to cancel, revoke, terminate or suspend, or to materially change in a manner adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries the terms of, any of Magticom’s 900 MHz, 1800 MHz or 2.1 GHz licenses will constitute, in and of itself, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
The Merger Agreement also contains various representations and warranties made by Purchaser and Parent that are subject, in some cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications. The representations and warranties relate to, among other things:
| | |
| • | organization, valid existence and good standing; |
| | |
| • | capitalization of Purchaser; |
| | |
| • | corporate or other power and authority to enter into the Merger Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; |
| | |
| • | enforceability of the Merger Agreement as against Purchaser and Parent; |
| | |
| • | required consents and approvals of governmental entities and other third parties in connection with the consummation of the Offer and the Merger; |
| | |
| • | the absence of any violation of or conflict with their governing documents, applicable law or certain agreements as a result of entering into the Merger Agreement and consummating the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; |
| | |
| • | the absence of legal proceedings and governmental orders; |
59
| | |
| • | accuracy and compliance with applicable securities law of the information supplied by Purchaser and Parent for inclusion in the filings made with the SEC in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; |
| | |
| • | financing arrangements among the Investors, Parent and Purchaser to pay for Common Shares purchased in the Offer and the Merger; |
| | |
| • | absence of undisclosed brokers’ fees; and |
| | |
| • | the independent investigation of the Company and its subsidiaries conducted by Parent and Purchaser and their representatives in connection with the Merger Agreement. |
The representations and warranties of each of the parties contained in the Merger Agreement will expire upon the Effective Time.
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger. Under the Merger Agreement, the Company has agreed that, subject to certain exceptions, between the date of the Merger Agreement and prior to the date on which a majority of the Company’s directors are designees of Parent or Purchaser or the date, if any, on which the Merger Agreement is earlier terminated:
| | |
| • | The Company and its subsidiaries will conduct their operations only in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; and |
| | |
| • | The Company and its subsidiaries will use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain and preserve intact the Company’s business organization and advantageous business relationships and to retain the services of the Company’s key officers and key employees. |
The Merger Agreement provides that “conduct of business in the ordinary course” includes (x) the initiation of lines-of-business or launch of new services consistent with the basic strategy of each subsidiary of the Company, (y) the introduction or withdrawal of service packages within present lines-of-business of any subsidiary of the Company, when such action is consistent with prevailing market or competitive circumstances or in response to opportunities which might emerge, and (z) minor additions to the capital construction programs of any subsidiary of the Company, not included within the annual business plan, but advantageous to furtherance of such subsidiary’s basic business.
The Company has also agreed that during the same time period, except (in most cases) in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and subject to certain other exceptions, the Company will not, and will cause each of its subsidiaries not to (unless Parent gives its prior written consent):
60
| | |
| • | amend or waive any provision of the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Company or any organizational documents of its subsidiaries or, in the case of the Company, enter into any agreement with any of its stockholders in their capacity as such; |
| | |
| • | make, declare or pay any dividend, or make any other distribution with respect to, or directly or indirectly redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire or encumber, any Common Shares or any other securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or any securities convertible (whether currently convertible or convertible only after the passage of time or the occurrence of certain events) into or exchangeable for Common Shares or any other securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, except (x) in connection with cashless exercises or similar transactions pursuant to the exercise of Company stock options or other awards issued and outstanding as of the date hereof under the Company’s stock plans or permitted hereunder to be granted after the date hereof, (y) paid by subsidiaries of the Company in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or (z) Common Shares issued by the Company upon conversion of Preferred Shares in accordance with Section 8 of the Certificate of Designation; |
| | |
| • | adjust, split, combine or reclassify the Common Shares or any other securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or issue or authorize or propose the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for any Common Shares or any other securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (other than Common Shares issued by the Company upon (x) conversion of Preferred Shares in accordance with Section 8 of the Certificate of Designation or (y) exercise of any Company stock option or warrants); |
| | |
| • | make any material change (or file any such change) in any method of tax accounting or any tax election (except, in each case, as in the ordinary course of business or as is consistent with past practice), settle or compromise any material tax liability or enter into any agreement relating to taxes, in each case for an amount materially in excess of the amount reserved therefor on the financial statements included in the Company SEC filings; |
| | |
| • | except as required by existing written agreements or Company’s benefit plans, or as required by applicable law, (A) increase the compensation or other benefits payable or provided to the Company’s directors or executive officers, except for increases to executive officers in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice that become effective no earlier than January 1, 2008 and only in the event the Acceptance Date does not occur prior to such date, (B) enter into any employment, change in control, severance or retention agreement with any employee of the Company or (C) establish, adopt, enter |
61
| | |
| | into or amend any collective bargaining agreements, or Company’s benefit plans, except to the extent required to comply with Section 409A of the Tax Code; |
| | |
| • | enter into or make any loans to any of its officers, directors, employees, agents or consultants (other than loans or advances in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice) or make any change in its existing borrowing or lending arrangements for or on behalf of any of such Persons, except as required by the terms of any Company’s benefit plans; |
| | |
| • | materially change financial accounting policies or procedures or any of its methods of reporting income, deductions or other material items for financial accounting purposes, except as required by GAAP, SEC rule or policy or applicable law or as may arise in response to findings of the Company’s independent auditors; |
| | |
| • | except for transactions among the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries or among the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, issue, sell, pledge, dispose of or encumber, or authorize the issuance, sale, pledge, disposition or encumbrance of, any Common Shares or other equity interests in the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any Common Shares or other equity interests, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire or with respect to any Common Shares, other equity interests in the Company or any of its subsidiaries or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any Common Shares or other equity interests, or take any action to cause to be exercisable any otherwise unexercisable Company stock options, other than (A) issuances of Common Shares in respect of any exercise of Company stock options that are outstanding on the date of the Merger Agreement or may be granted after such date hereof as permitted under the Merger Agreement, (B) the grant of equity compensation awards in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice under the Company stock plans, (C) the acquisition of Shares from a holder of a Company stock option or of restricted Common Shares in satisfaction of withholding obligations or, in the case of a Company stock option, in payment of the exercise price and (D) issuance of Common Shares in respect of the conversion of Preferred Shares in accordance with Section 8 of the Certificate of Designation; |
| | |
| • | sell, pledge, dispose of or encumber, or authorize the sale, pledge, disposition or encumbrance of, any securities or other equity interests, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire or with respect to any securities or other equity interests, or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any equity |
62
| | |
| | securities or other equity interests, in any of Telecom Georgia, Telenet and Ayety TV; |
| | |
| • | incur, assume, guarantee, prepay or otherwise become liable for any indebtedness for borrowed money (directly, contingently or otherwise), other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, except for (A) any indebtedness for borrowed money among the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries or among the Company’s subsidiaries, (B) indebtedness for money borrowed from persons who are not affiliates of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, in a principal amount not, in the aggregate, in excess of $3,000,000for the Company and all of its subsidiaries taken as a whole, (C) indebtedness incurred to refinance any existing indebtedness in an amount not to exceed, and on terms no less favorable in the aggregate than, such existing indebtedness, provided that no such indebtedness will contain covenants that would materially restrict the ability of the parties to consummate the Offer or any other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; |
| | |
| • | except for transactions among the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries or among the Company’s subsidiaries, sell, lease, license, transfer, exchange or swap, mortgage or otherwise encumber (including securitizations), or subject to any lien (other than certain liens as permitted by the Merger Agreement) or otherwise dispose of any material portion of its material properties or assets, including the capital stock of any subsidiaries, other than dispositions occurring in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; |
| | |
| • | other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, enter into any material contract or modify, amend, terminate or waive in any material respect any rights under any existing material contract, provided that the “ordinary course of business” includes undertaking contracts in connection with new subsidiary service offerings consistent with the basic subsidiary business strategy and for which there has been no “past practice”; |
| | |
| • | make any capital expenditures not contemplated by the operating budget Magticom in place as of the date hereof or having an aggregate value in excess of $4,000,000; |
| | |
| • | make any investment or acquisition of another person or business, whether by purchase of stock or securities, contributions to capital, property transfers, or entering into binding agreements with respect to any such investment or acquisition; |
63
| | |
| • | waive, release, assign, settle or compromise any claim, action or proceeding, other than waivers, releases, assignments, settlements or compromises that involve only the payment of monetary damages not in excess of $250,000 in the aggregate (excluding amounts to be paid under existing insurance policies) or otherwise pay, discharge or satisfy any claims, liabilities or obligations in excess of such amount, in each case, other than in the ordinary course consistent with past practice; |
| | |
| • | adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, merger, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization; or |
| | |
| • | agree to take, make any commitment to take, or adopt any resolutions of its Company’s board of directors in support of, any of the actions prohibited above. |
No Solicitation of Transactions. Subject to certain exceptions described below, from and after the date of the Merger Agreement and until the earlier of (x) the date on which a majority of the Company’s directors are designees of Parent or Purchaser and (y) the termination date of the Merger Agreement, the Company has agreed not to, and to direct its representatives not to:
| | |
| • | solicit, initiate, knowingly encourage (including by providing non-public information) or knowingly facilitate any inquiries, proposals or offers that constitute or would reasonably be expected to lead to any Alternative Proposal (as defined below); |
| | |
| • | engage or participate in any negotiations regarding, or provide or cause to be provided any non-public information or data relating to the Company or any of its subsidiaries in connection with, or have any discussions with any person relating to, an actual or proposed Alternative Proposal, or otherwise knowingly encourage or facilitate any effort or attempt to propose publicly to approve, endorse or recommend any Alternative Proposal; |
| | |
| • | approve, endorse or recommend, or publicly propose to approve, endorse or recommend, any Alternative Proposal; or |
| | |
| • | approve, endorse or recommend, or enter into, any letter of intent, agreement in principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement or other similar agreement with any person relating to any Alternative Proposal. |
In addition, the Company has agreed to, and to cause each of its subsidiaries to, and to direct each of its and its subsidiaries’ representatives to, immediately cease any existing solicitations, discussions or negotiations with any person (other than the parties
64
to the Merger Agreement) that has made or indicated an intention to make an Alternative Proposal on or prior to the date of the Merger Agreement.
As used in the Merger Agreement, “Alternative Proposal” means:
| | |
| • | any proposal, inquiry, indication of interest or offer from any person or group of persons (other than Parent or any of its subsidiaries) for a merger, reorganization, share exchange, consolidation, business combination, recapitalization, dissolution, liquidation or similar transaction involving the Company (or any subsidiary or subsidiaries of the Company whose business constitutes 20% or more of the net revenues, net income or assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than in respect of any interest not owned by the Company or any of its subsidiaries); |
| | |
| • | any proposal for the issuance by the Company of over 20% of its equity securities; or |
| | |
| • | any proposal or offer to acquire in any manner, directly or indirectly, over 20% of the equity securities or consolidated total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, in each case other than the Offer, the Merger or any other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and other than in respect of any interest not owned by the Company or any of its subsidiaries. |
However, the Company may, in response to an unsolicited bona fide Alternative Proposal that did not result from or arise in connection with a breach of the no solicitation provisions of the Merger Agreement (a “Qualifying Alternative Proposal”) and that the Company’s board of directors determines, in good faith, after consultation with its outside counsel and financial advisors, may reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal (as defined below):
| | |
| • | furnish non-public information with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries to the person making such Qualifying Alternative Proposal and its representatives pursuant to a customary confidentiality agreement no less restrictive in any material respect of and no more favorable in any material respect to the other party than the confidentiality terms and conditions of the Confidentiality Agreement (provided that such confidentiality agreement need not include any “standstill” or prohibitions on the ability of such third party to communicate with the Company’s minority partners in an effort to facilitate the consummation of the Qualifying Alternative Proposal); and |
| | |
| • | participate in discussions or negotiations with such person and its representatives regarding such Qualifying Alternative Proposal. |
65
The Company has agreed to promptly provide or make available to Parent any material non-public information concerning the Company or any of its subsidiaries that is provided to the person making such Qualifying Alternative Proposal or its representatives that was not previously provided or made available to Parent.
As used in the Merger Agreement, “Superior Proposal” means any Alternative Proposal (provided that, for purposes of the definition of “Superior Proposal”, the references to “20%” in the definition of Alternative Proposal are replaced by “50%”):
| | |
| • | on terms that the Company’s board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel and financial advisors, to be more favorable to the holders of Shares than the Offer and the Merger, taking into account all of the respective terms and conditions of such Alternative Proposal; and |
| | |
| • | that the Company’s board of directors believes is reasonably capable of being completed, taking into account all financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects of such proposal. |
The Company has also agreed that its board of directors will not withdraw, qualify or modify the Recommendation in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser, or publicly propose to do so, or approve or recommend, or publicly propose to approve or recommend, any Alternative Proposal. However, the Company’s board of directors may withdraw, qualify or modify the Recommendation in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser (a “Change of Recommendation”) if, prior to the Acceptance Date, in response to a Qualifying Alternative Proposal, the Company’s board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with outside counsel and financial advisors, that (x) such Qualifying Alternative Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal and (y) failure to so withdraw, qualify or modify the Recommendation would be inconsistent with the Company’s board of directors’ exercise of its fiduciary duties.
No Change of Recommendation may be effected unless, (i) prior to effecting such Change of Recommendation, the Company provides written notice to Parent, at least three business days in advance of the proposed effective date of such Change of Recommendation (the “Notice Period”), of its intention to effect such Change of Recommendation, which notice will specify all material terms and conditions of the Qualifying Alternative Proposal giving rise to such Change of Recommendation (including the identity of the person making such Qualifying Alternative Proposal and copies of any documents or correspondence evidencing such Qualifying Alternative Proposal), and any material modifications to any of the foregoing, (ii) during the Notice Period, if Parent so requests, the Company has agreed, and has agreed to cause its financial advisers and outside counsel to, negotiate with Parent in good faith to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of Merger Agreement so that such Qualifying Alternative Proposal ceases to constitute (in the good faith judgment of the
66
Company’s board of directors) a Superior Proposal, and (iii) such Qualifying Alternative Proposal continues to constitute (in the good faith judgment of the Company’s board of directors) a Superior Proposal after taking into account any such amendments that Parent has agreed to make prior to the end of the Notice Period.
The Company’s board of directors may also withdraw, modify or amend the Recommendation at any time prior to the Acceptance Date if it determines, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action is reasonably likely to result in a breach of its fiduciary obligations to the stockholders of the Company under applicable laws. However, the Company’s board of directors may not take any such action in response to or in connection with an Alternative Proposal, except as described above.
The Company has agreed to promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) advise Parent orally and in writing of (i) any Alternative Proposal or indication or inquiry with respect to, or that would reasonably be expected to lead to, any Alternative Proposal, or (ii) any request for non-public information relating to the Company or its subsidiaries, other than requests for information not reasonably expected to be related to an Alternative Proposal, including in each case a description of the material terms of any such Alternative Proposal or indication, inquiry or request. The Company has also agreed to keep Parent reasonably informed on a reasonably current basis of any material change to the terms of any such Alternative Proposal, indication, inquiry or request.
The Merger Agreement does not prohibit the Company or its board of directors from disclosing to its stockholders a position contemplated by Rules 14d-9, Item 1012(a) of Regulation M-A and Rule and 14e-2(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act, or from issuing a “stop, look and listen” statement pending disclosure of its position under such statement. The parties have also agreed that (i) a factually accurate public statement by the Company that describes the Company’s receipt of an Alternative Proposal and the operation of the Merger Agreement with respect thereto, shall not be deemed a withdrawal or modification, or proposal by the board of directors of the Company to withdraw or modify the Recommendation, or an approval or recommendation with respect to such Alternative Proposal, so long as such public statement includes a statement that the board of directors of the Company continues to support the Recommendation, and (ii) any “stop, look and listen” communication by the board of directors of the Company pursuant to Rule 14d-9(f) under the Exchange Act, or any similar communication to the shareholders of the Company or otherwise, shall not constitute a Change of Recommendation or a withdrawal or modification, or proposal by the board of directors of the Company to withdraw or modify the Recommendation, or an approval or recommendation with respect to any Alternative Proposal.
The Merger Agreement provides also that, notwithstanding the foregoing non-solicitation provisions, any action on the part of the Company’s minority partners in International Telcell Cellular, a subsidiary of the Company, including in respect to the
67
transfer, sale or other disposition of their ownership interests in such subsidiary of the Company, will not be deemed to be a breach of any of the non-solicitation obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Merger Agreement.
Employee Matters. The Merger Agreement provides that, from and after the Acceptance Date, the Company and, after the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation, will, and Parent will cause the Company and the Surviving Corporation to, honor all benefit plans of the Company and compensation arrangements and agreements in accordance with their terms as in effect immediately before the Acceptance Date. However, the Merger Agreement does not prohibit the amendment or termination of any such benefit plans or compensation arrangements or agreements in accordance with their terms and applicable law at any time or from time to time thereafter.
The Merger Agreement also provides that, as of the Acceptance Date, Parent, the Company and, after the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation, and each of their respective subsidiaries will have all applicable obligations, liabilities and commitments in respect of providing notices and making available health care continuation coverage required by the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended, for all present and former employees of the Company (and their qualifying spouses or dependents) who are eligible for such coverage at any time prior to or following the Acceptance Date.
Commercially Reasonable Efforts. Each of the parties to the Merger Agreement has agreed to use, and cause each of its subsidiaries to use, all commercially reasonable efforts to take promptly, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do promptly, or cause to be done, and to assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable laws to fulfill all conditions applicable to such party pursuant to the Merger Agreement and to consummate and make effective, as promptly as reasonably practicable, the Offer, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including(i) obtaining all necessary third-party consents and governmental approvals,(ii) defending any lawsuits or other legal proceedings, whether judicial or administrative, challenging the Merger Agreement or the consummation of the Offer, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement,(iii) consulting and cooperating with, providing assistance to and furnishing information requested by the other party in the preparation and filing with the SEC of the Schedule TO, other documents required to be filed in connection with the Offer, the Schedule 14D-9, the Proxy Statement and all necessary amendments and supplements thereto, and(iv) executing and delivering any additional instruments reasonably necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
Subject to applicable legal limitations and the instructions of any governmental entity, the Company and Parent have agreed to keep each other apprised of the status of matters relating to the completion of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including, to the extent permitted by law, promptly furnishing the other with
68
copies of notices or other communications sent or received by the Company or Parent or any of their respective subsidiaries, to or from any third party or any governmental entity with respect to such transactions. The Company and Parent have agreed to permit the other party to review in advance any proposed written communication to any supervisory or governmental entity. Each of the Company and Parent has agreed not to initiate any substantive meeting or discussion, either in person or by telephone, with any governmental entity in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement unless it consults with the other party in advance and, to the extent not prohibited by such governmental entity, gives the other party the opportunity to attend and participate in such meeting or discussion.
If any administrative or judicial action or proceeding, including any proceeding by a private party, is instituted (or threatened to be instituted) challenging any transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement, each of the Company and Parent has agreed to cooperate in all respects with each other and to use their respective reasonable best efforts to contest and resist any such action or proceeding and to have vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any decree, judgment, injunction or other order, whether temporary, preliminary or permanent, that is in effect and that prohibits, prevents or restricts consummation of the Offer, the Merger or any other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
The parties have further agreed that, in the event that, prior to the commencement of the Offer, the Common Shares or the Preferred Shares are deregistered under the Exchange Act, each of the parties to the Merger Agreement will, and will cause its subsidiaries to, use reasonable best efforts to take promptly, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do promptly, or cause to be done, and to assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things necessary, proper or advisable under all applicable laws to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
Indemnification and Insurance. The Merger Agreement provides that, from and after the Effective Time, Parent will, and will cause the Surviving Corporation to, cause the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws (or similar organization documents) of the Company and its subsidiaries to contain provisions no less favorable with respect to indemnification than are set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws (or similar organization documents) of the Company and its subsidiaries as of the date of the Merger Agreement, which provisions may not be amended, repealed or otherwise modified for a period of six years after the Effective Time in any manner that would affect adversely the rights of individuals who, at or prior to the Effective Time, were directors, officers, employees, fiduciaries or agents of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
After the Effective Time, Parent will, and will cause the Surviving Corporation to, fulfill and honor in all respects, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, the obligations of the Company pursuant to any indemnification, exculpation and
69
advancement of expenses provision in favor of each present and former director or officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) contained in the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company or similar organization documents of its subsidiaries, or in any agreement between an Indemnified Party and the Company in effect as of the date of this Agreement, with respect to any costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages, liabilities and settlement amounts paid in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation (whether arising before or after the Effective Time), whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, arising out of or pertaining to any action or omission, in his or her capacity as an officer or director of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, occurring at or before the Effective Time. In the event of any such claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, (i) the Surviving Corporation will pay the reasonable fees and expenses of counsel selected by the Indemnified Parties, which counsel must be reasonably satisfactory to the Surviving Corporation, promptly after statements therefor are received (provided the applicable Indemnified Party provides an undertaking, to the extent required by applicable law, the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Company or similar organizational documents of its subsidiaries, or by the applicable agreement between the Indemnified Party and the Company, to repay all advanced expenses if it is finally judicially determined that such Indemnified Party is not entitled to indemnification), and (ii) the Surviving Corporation will cooperate in the defense of any such matter. However, the Surviving Corporation will not be liable for any settlement effected without its prior written consent and will not be obligated to pay the fees and expenses of more than one counsel (selected by a plurality of the applicable Indemnified Parties) for all Indemnified Parties in any jurisdiction with respect to any single action, except to the extent that two or more of such Indemnified Parties have conflicting interests in the outcome of such action. In the event that any claim for indemnification is asserted or made within such six-year period, all rights to indemnification in respect of such claim will continue until the disposition of such claim.
The Merger Agreement further provides that, at or prior to the Acceptance Date, the Company will purchase, at the Company’s expense, an extended “tail” reporting period for the Company’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy in effect as of the date hereof (the “Current D&O Policy”), which extended “tail” reporting period will (i) be for an effective period of six (6) years after the Acceptance Date, (ii) be for the benefit of those persons who are covered by the Current D&O Policy, (iii) be purchased at a premium not in excess of $1.7 million and (iv) will contain terms with respect to coverage and amount no less favorable than those contained in the Current D&O Policy.
If such extended “tail” reporting period cannot be obtained, or can only be obtained by the payment of a premium in excess of $1.7 million, then the Company will only be required to purchase such extended period, if any, as may be available for such length of time as can be obtained by the payment of a premium not in excess of such amount. If such “tail” policy has been obtained by the Company prior to the Acceptance
70
Date, Parent and the Company (and after the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation) will be required to maintain such “tail” policy in full force and effect for its full term and shall continue to honor the Company’s obligations under such “tail” policy.
The Merger Agreement provides also that, in the event the Surviving Corporation or any of its successors or assigns(i) consolidates with or merges into any other person and is not continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger, or(ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties and assets to any person, then proper provisions will be made so that the successors and assigns of the Surviving Corporation shall succeed to its obligations with respect to indemnification and insurance described above.
The foregoing provisions with respect to indemnification and insurance are intended to be for the benefit of, and grant third-party rights to and are enforceable by, each Indemnified Party and his or her heirs and representatives. Such provisions are in addition to, and not in substitution for, any other rights to indemnification or contribution that any such person may have, by contract or otherwise. The Merger Agreement provides also that, if any Indemnified Party makes any claim for indemnification or advancement of expenses as described above that is denied by Parent or the Surviving Corporation, and a court of competent jurisdiction determines that the Indemnified Party is entitled to such indemnification, then Parent or the Surviving Corporation will pay such Indemnified Party’s costs and expenses, including reasonable legal fees and expenses, incurred in connection with pursuing such claim against Parent or the Surviving Corporation.
Metromedia Name, Trademark and Logo. The Merger Agreement provides that, subject to the rights of Metromedia Company, an affiliate of the Company, specified in the License Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1995, by and between Metromedia Company and the Company (as amended, the “License Agreement”) will automatically terminate on the first anniversary of the Acceptance Date. Parent and Purchaser have agreed (on behalf of themselves and their affiliates) that they:
| | |
| • | have no right, title or interest in or to, or license or right to use, (i) (A) the Metromedia logo, (B) the trade name, trademark and corporate name “Metromedia”, (C) any domain names or other trademarks, service marks, trade names, brand names, trade dress, designs, logos, corporate names and other indicia of origin, whether registered or unregistered (and any registrations or applications therefore), and the goodwill associated exclusively therewith, owned by Metromedia Company and (D) any variations or derivations of any of the foregoing (collectively, the “Metromedia Master Marks”), or (ii) any domain names or other trademarks, service marks, trade names, brand names, trade dress, designs, logos, corporate names and other indicia of origin (whether registered or unregistered) incorporating any of the Metromedia Master Marks, other than as set forth in the License Agreement; |
71
| | |
| • | will not at any time contest the validity of Metromedia Company’s (or any of its affiliates’) title to, or any of Metromedia Company’s (or any of its affiliates’) rights in or to, any of the Metromedia Master Marks; and |
| | |
| • | will not at any time register or apply to register any Metromedia Master Marks or any domain names or other trademarks, service marks, trade names, brand names, trade dress, designs, logos, corporate names and other indicia of origin incorporating the Metromedia Master Marks anywhere in the world. |
The Merger Agreement further provides that, at or as soon as possible following the first anniversary of the Acceptance Date, but in no event later than five business days following the first anniversary of the Acceptance Date, Parent and Purchaser will, and will cause their affiliates to:
| | |
| • | cease all uses whatsoever of the Metromedia Master Marks, without benefit of any additional sell off or transitional period, and will not, and will cause their affiliates not to, at any time thereafter, use any Metromedia Master Mark in connection with the business or operation of the Company or the Surviving Corporation or otherwise use any Metromedia Master Mark as a trade name, trademark, service mark, domain name or otherwise, without the express written consent of Metromedia Company; and |
| | |
| • | cease use of all advertising, promotional materials, letterhead, business cards, vehicles, websites, signage, buildings, broadcasting, packaging, labeling, invoices, documents, and any other materials whatsoever used in connection with the business or operation of the Company or the Surviving Corporation or any of its affiliates and bearing any Metromedia Master Mark or will cause the Metromedia Master Marks to be removed from all such materials prior to their use. |
In order to assist Parent in preparation for the foregoing obligations under the Merger Agreement, the Company has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to take all actions prior to the first anniversary of the Acceptance Date reasonably requested by Parent.
Back-End Merger. The Merger Agreement provides that, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Parent will, and will cause Purchaser to, use its reasonable best efforts to take promptly, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do promptly, or cause to be done, and to assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable laws to consummate and make effective, as promptly as reasonable, the Merger.
72
Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Parent and Purchaser have agreed to cause the Company to comply with all of the provisions of the Certificate of Designation (including Section 5 thereof) from and after the Acceptance Date.
The Merger Agreement provides also that, following consummation of the Merger, in the event any holder of Common Shares or Preferred Shares demands and perfects such holder’s right to dissent from the Merger and seek an appraisal of such holder’s Shares or Preferred Shares, then for so long as there is any pending appraisal proceeding before a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL, the Surviving Corporation will not, and Parent will cause the Surviving Corporation not to, directly or indirectly, sell, lease, pledge or exchange any property, pay any dividend or make any distribution to its shareholders or any affiliate of its shareholders, unless in any such case the aggregate value of the assets of the Company following such transaction is equal to or exceeds the sum of (x) 200% of the product of the number of Common Shares in respect of which there is a pending appraisal proceeding at the time of such transaction multiplied by the Merger Consideration and (y) the number of Preferred Shares in respect of which there is a pending appraisal proceeding at the time of such transaction multiplied by the Liquidation Preference (as defined in the Certificate of Designation) of the Preferred Shares,provided that this provision of the Merger Agreement will not prohibit any sale, lease, pledge or exchange of property to any third party that is not an affiliate of the Company, Parent or its shareholders (or any affiliate of Parent’s shareholders) for fair market value;provided, further, that in the event of a sale, lease, pledge or exchange referenced in the preceding proviso, the Surviving Corporation will not, and Parent will cause the Surviving Corporation not to, directly or indirectly, pay any dividend or make any loan or distribution to its shareholders or any affiliate of its shareholders unless the aggregate value of the assets of the Company following such dividend, loan or distribution is equal to or exceeds the amounts referenced in clauses (x) and (y) above. These provisions of the Merger Agreement are designed to provide credit protection and security for any potential claim a dissenting holder might have against the Company or the Surviving Corporation as a result of the final resolution of such pending appraisal proceeding.
Financial Information. The Merger Agreement provides that, in the event that, following consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the Company’s securities are deregistered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act and any of the Company’s securities are held by holders other than Parent, Purchaser or their respective affiliates, and notwithstanding that the Company may not be subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Company will use reasonable commercial efforts to timely prepare and make available to its stockholders (which may be done by posting such materials on the Company’s website), without cost to such stockholders, quarterly and annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, the United Kingdom
73
or adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board, as determined by the Company.
Other Covenants and Agreements. The Merger Agreement contains additional agreements among the Company, Purchaser and Parent relating to, among other things:
| | | |
| • | providing Parent access to the Company’s properties, contracts, commitments, books and records; |
| | |
| • | notices of certain events, and cooperation to mitigate any adverse consequences of those events; |
| | |
| • | the filing of documents with the SEC; |
| | |
| • | the issuance of a press release announcing the execution of the Merger Agreement; |
| | |
| • | actions necessary to exempt the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement from the effect of any takeover statutes; |
| | |
| • | the opportunity for Parent to participate in the defense or settlement of stockholder litigation against the Company or its directors of officers relating to the transactions contemplated by the Offer and the Merger Agreement; |
| | |
| • | delivery by the Company of an affidavit stating that the Company has not been a “United States real property holding corporation,” within the meaning of Section 897(c)(2) of the Tax Code, at any time in the five-year period ending on the Expiration Date; and |
| | |
| • | the obligation of the Company and, after the Acceptance Date and prior to the Effective Time, of Parent to take all necessary actions to cause the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including any dispositions of Common Shares (and derivative securities with respect to Common Shares) by each individual who is or will be subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act with respect to the Company to be exempt under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. |
| | |
Conditions to the Merger. The obligations of the parties to complete the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following mutual conditions: |
| | | |
| • | Purchaser has accepted for purchase the Common Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer, provided that this condition will be deemed satisfied if Purchaser |
74
| | | |
| | fails, in breach of the Merger Agreement, to accept for purchase any Common Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer; |
| | |
| • | any subsequent offering period made available by Purchaser has expired; |
| | |
| • | unless a short-form merger can be consummated, the affirmative vote of the holders (including Purchaser and its affiliates following Purchaser’s acceptance of Common Shares for payment under the Offer) of a majority of the outstanding Common Shares has been obtained; and |
| | |
| • | no governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has enacted, issued or entered any restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or similar legal restraint or prohibition that remains in effect that enjoins or otherwise prohibits consummation of the Merger. |
| | |
Termination. The Merger Agreement may be terminated, and the Offer or the Merger may be abandoned, at any time prior to the Acceptance Date, as follows: |
|
| • | by the mutual written consent of the Company and Parent; |
| | |
| • | by either the Company or Parent, if Purchaser has not have accepted for payment and paid for Shares pursuant to the Offer on or before December 31, 2007 (the “End Date”); |
| | |
| • | by either the Company or Parent, if any governmental entity has issued or entered an order, injunction or similar legal restraint permanently enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Offer or the Merger, and such order, injunction or legal restraint has become final and non-appealable; |
| | |
| • | by the Company, if Parent or Purchaser has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in Merger Agreement, which breach or failure to perform: |
| | |
| | • | would (A) reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to prevent or materially delay or materially impair the ability of Parent or Purchaser to satisfy the conditions to the Offer or the conditions precedent to the Merger or to consummate the Merger, the Offer and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, or (B) result in a failure of the conditions to the Offer or any conditions to the Merger to be capable of being satisfied, or the Offer to be consummated, by the End Date; and |
75
| | | |
| | • | such breach or failure to perform is not curable or, if curable, is not cured by Parent or Purchaser within thirty days after written notice thereof is given by the Company to Parent; |
| | | |
| • | by the Company, if all of the conditions to the Offer (excluding conditions that, by their terms, cannot be satisfied until the Expiration Date, but that would be reasonably capable of being satisfied as the Expiration Date) are satisfied or waived and Parent and Purchaser fail to accept for payment or pay for any tendered Shares in accordance with their obligations under the Merger Agreement; |
| | |
| • | by Parent, if the Company has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in Merger Agreement, which breach or failure to perform: |
| | |
| | • | would result in a failure of the conditions to the Offer or any conditions set to the Merger to be capable of being satisfied, or the Offer to be consummated, by the End Date; and |
| | | |
| | • | such breach or failure to perform is not curable or, if curable, is not cured by the Company within thirty days after written notice thereof is given by Parent to the Company; |
| | | |
| • | by the Company, if the Company’s board of directors has approved, endorsed or recommended any Superior Proposal in accordance with the Merger Agreement (provided that any such purported termination will be void and of no force and effect unless, prior to or concurrently with and as a condition to the effectiveness of such termination, the Company pays the Termination Fee (as defined below) and the Termination Expenses (as defined below) as set forth in the Merger Agreement); |
| | |
| • | by Parent, if the Company’s board of directors: |
| | |
| | • | has effected a Change of Recommendation in accordance with the Merger Agreement; or |
| | | |
| | • | has approved, endorsed or recommended, or publicly proposed to approve, endorse or recommend, any Alternative Proposal; or |
| | | |
| • | by either the Company or Parent, if the conditions to the Offer have not been satisfied or waived at any scheduled Expiration Date and the offering period of the Offer is not extended in accordance with the Merger Agreement, provided that (after giving effect to any tolling of the offering period of the Offer in accordance with the Merger Agreement), Parent may not terminate |
76
| | |
| | the Merger Agreement under this provision if it is in breach of its obligation, if any of the conditions to the Offer have not been satisfied or waived at any scheduled expiration date of the Offer, to extend the Offer until such conditions are satisfied or waived, the Merger Agreement is terminated or it becomes reasonably apparent that such conditions are not reasonably capable of being satisfied by the End Date (such extensions not to exceed in the aggregate twenty business days). |
Termination Fee Payable by the Company; Termination Expenses. The Company has agreed that, if the Merger Agreement has been terminated:
| | |
| • | by Parent or the Company because (x) Purchaser has not accepted for payment and paid for the Common Shares pursuant to the Offer on or before the End Date or (y) the conditions to the Offer have not been satisfied or waived at any scheduled Expiration Date and the Offer is not extended in accordance with the Merger Agreement, and (A) at any time prior to such termination a bona fide Eligible Alternative Proposal (as defined below) has been publicly announced or has been made or submitted to the Company and has not been withdrawn, (B) concurrently with such termination or within twelve months after the date of such termination the Company or any of its subsidiaries (x) consummates an Eligible Alternative Proposal or (y) enters into a definitive agreement with respect to an Eligible Alternative Proposal and such Eligible Alternative Proposal is subsequently consummated, and (C) such termination was not due to a material breach by Parent or Purchaser of their obligations under the Merger Agreement, then the Company will pay Parent (1) $5,500,000 (the “Termination Fee”) and (2) an amount, not to exceed $2,000,000, equal to the all actual and reasonable documented out-of-pocket expenses (including all attorneys’, accountants’ and other professionals’ fees and expenses) incurred by Parent, Purchaser or their affiliates in connection with or related to the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Termination Expenses”); |
| | |
| • | by Parent (x) because the Offer is not consummated by the End Date due to a material breach by the Company or (y) the Company has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the Merger Agreement, which breach or failure to perform (i) would result in a failure of the following conditions to be capable of being satisfied by the End Date: (A) the condition to the offer (1) that any representations or warranties of the Company be true and correct as of the date of the Merger Agreement and as of the Expiration Date, except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case as of such date, and except where such failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company |
77
| | |
| | Material Adverse Effect, or (2) that the Company shall have performed in all material respects all obligations and complied with all covenants required by the Merger Agreement to be performed or complied with by the Company prior to the Expiration Date, or shall have cured any failure to perform such obligations or to comply with such covenants prior to the Expiration Date, or (B) any of the conditions to the parties’ obligation to effect the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and (ii) such breach or failure to perform is not curable or, if curable, is not cured by the Company within thirty days after written notice of such breach or failure to perform is given by Parent to the Company, then (A) the Company will pay Parent the Termination Expenses and (B) if, concurrently with such termination or within twelve months after the date of such termination the Company or any of its subsidiaries enters into a definitive agreement with respect to, or consummates, any Eligible Alternative Proposal, then the Company will also pay Parent the Termination Fee; |
| | |
| • | by the Company because its board of directors has approved, recommended or endorsed a Superior Proposal, then the Company will pay Parent the Termination Fee (which shall be payable prior to or concurrently with and as a condition to the effectiveness of such termination) and the Termination Expenses; or |
| | |
| • | by Parent because of a Change of Recommendation by the Company’s board of directors, then the Company will pay Parent the Termination Fee and the Termination Expenses. |
“Eligible Alternative Proposal” means (i) any proposal, inquiry, indication of interest or offer from any person or group of persons (other than Parent or any of its subsidiaries) for a merger, consolidation, business combination, sale, transfer or similar transaction involving at least 50% of the Company’s assets (or any subsidiaries of the Company whose business constitutes 50% or more of the net revenues, net income or assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, not including any interest not owned by the Company or any of its subsidiaries) or (ii) any proposal or offer to acquire in any manner, directly or indirectly, over 50% of the equity securities or consolidated total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries (or any subsidiary or subsidiaries of the Company whose business constitutes 50% or more of the net revenues, net income or assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, not including any interest not owned by the Company or any of its subsidiaries), in each case other than the Offer, the Merger or any other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and other than in respect of any interest not owned by the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
78
The Merger Agreement provides that, except as described above, the Termination Fee is payable by the Company within two business days after the date of the event giving rise to the obligation to pay the Termination Fee. Termination Expenses are payable by the Company within two business days after receipt by the Company of reasonable documentation with respect to such Termination Expenses.
Termination Fee Payable by Parent. The Merger Agreement provides that Parent will pay the Company a termination fee of $10,000,000 (the “Parent Termination Fee”) if:
| | |
| • | the Merger Agreement is terminated by either the Company or Parent because Purchaser has not accepted for payment and paid for the Common Shares pursuant to the Offer on or before the End Date due to a material breach of Parent or Purchaser; |
| | |
| • | the Merger Agreement is terminated by the Company because Parent or Purchaser has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the Merger Agreement, which breach or failure to perform (i) would (A) reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to prevent or materially delay or materially impair the ability of Parent or Purchaser to timely consummate the Offer, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or (B) result in a failure of any conditions to the Offer or any of the conditions to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement to be capable of being satisfied, or the Offer to be consummated, by the End Date, and (ii) is not curable or, if curable, is not cured by Parent or Purchaser within thirty days after written notice of such breach or failure to perform is given by the Company to Parent; or |
| | |
| • | the Merger Agreement is terminated by the Company if (x) all of the conditions to the Offer (excluding conditions that, by their terms, cannot be satisfied until the Expiration Date, but which would be reasonably capable of being satisfied at the Expiration Date) are satisfied or waived, and (y) Parent and Purchaser fail to accept for payment or pay for any tendered Common Shares in accordance with their obligations under the Merger Agreement. |
The Parent Termination Fee is payable by Parent upon termination of the Merger Agreement. Upon payment of the Parent Termination Fee, neither Parent nor Purchaser will have any further liability with respect to the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Under no circumstances will Parent be required to pay the Parent Termination Fee on more than one occasion. Parent has delivered to the Company a letter of credit, in form reasonably satisfactory to the Company, issued by Barclays Bank, respectively, with a face amount of $10,000,000, in order to secure the obligation to pay the Parent Termination Fee to the Company. In the event the conditions
79
to the termination of such letter of credit set forth therein are satisfied, the Company will promptly execute and deliver to the financial institution that issued such letter of credit a written certificate or statement, in the form attached to such letter of credit or otherwise required by such financial institutions, certifying on behalf of the Company that the conditions to the termination of such letter of credit have been satisfied and that such letter of credit should as a result be terminated.
Amendment and Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time, any provision of the Merger Agreement may be amended or waived if, and only if, such amendment or waiver is in writing and signed, in the case of an amendment, by the Company, Parent and Purchaser, or in the case of a waiver, by the party against whom the waiver is to be effective. After receipt of the approval of the Merger and the approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of the Company, if applicable, if any such amendment or waiver by applicable law requires further approval of the stockholders of the Company, the effectiveness of such amendment or waiver will be subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company. No failure or delay by the Company or Parent in exercising any right under the Merger Agreement will operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise of any other right under the Merger Agreement.
The Tender and Support Agreements.
Each of the following individuals, as holders of the Common Shares set forth next to their respective names below, entered into a Tender and Support Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2007 (the “Support Agreement”), with Parent and Purchaser:
| | | | | | |
| Stockholders | | | | Number of Common Shares | |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Hauf | | | Up to 9,100,0001 | |
| | |
| |
|
1 | An award of up to 9,110,000 of restricted Common Shares was granted by the Company to Mr. Hauf on May 25, 2007 pursuant to the Metromedia International Group, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). These restricted Common Shares are subject to transfer and forfeiture conditions outlined in the Stock Incentive Plan and a Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2007 (the “Restricted Stock Award Agreement”) between Mr. Hauf and the Company. Of the total number of Common Shares subject to the restricted stock award, 2,610,000 were granted in order to make Mr. Hauf whole, on a net after-tax basis, for potential “golden parachute” excise taxes in the event of a change in control of the Company in which shareholders of the Company receive cash consideration. These restricted Common Shares will vest only to the extent necessary to cover such excise taxes and will be forfeited to the extent not necessary for that purpose. The remainder of the award, 6,500,000 restricted Common Shares, will vest immediately (i) upon a change in control of the Company, (ii) upon termination of Mr. Hauf’s employment by the Company |
80
| | | | | | |
Metromedia Company | | | 12,415,455 | |
| | | | |
Anita H. Subotnick & Stuart Subotnick JT Ten | | | 231,225 | |
| | | | |
Stuart Subotnick | | | 83,100 | |
| | | | |
The Trust, dated as of May 30, 1984, as amended and restated, John W. Kluge, as grantor, and John W. Kluge, David Finkelstein and Stuart Subotnick, as trustees | | | 4,604,548 | |
| | | | |
News America Incorporated | | | 9,136,744 | |
The Support Agreement, among other things, (i) restrict the transfer of Common Shares held by the applicable stockholder, (ii) obligates the stockholder to vote his or her Common Shares in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and in favor of each of the other actions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and against approval of any proposal made in opposition to, or in competition with, consummation of the Offer, the Merger or any other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and (iii) obligates such stockholder to tender all of his or her Common Shares in the Offer, all pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Tender and Support Agreement.
In addition, each stockholder who entered into the Support Agreement granted an irrevocable proxy appointing persons designated by Parent as such shareholder’s attorney-in-fact and proxy to vote and exercise all voting and related rights with respect to such stockholder’s Common Shares (including any Common Shares each such stockholder may acquire in the future).
The aggregate number of Common Shares owned by the stockholders who have entered into the Support Agreement is 35,581,072. Based on the number of Common Shares outstanding as of July 13, 2007, the number of Common Shares owned by the stockholders who have entered into the Support Agreement represent approximately 34.46% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.
| |
|
|
| without cause, (iii) if Mr. Hauf resigns for good reason, (iv) upon Mr. Hauf’s death or (v) upon the termination of Mr. Hauf’s employment by the Company due to Mr. Hauf’s disability. (The term “change in control” has the same meaning as in the Stock Incentive Plan. The terms “cause,” “good reason” and “disability” are defined in the Restricted Stock Award Agreement.) |
81
The foregoing summary of the Support Agreement qualified in its entirety by reference to the Support Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference and a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to the Schedule TO.
Confidentiality Agreements. On April 10, 2007, Salford Georgia entered into a confidentiality agreement with the Company in connection with the proposed transaction. On May 10, 2007, Sun Capital entered into a confidentiality agreement with the Company in connection with the proposed transaction. Under each of the confidentiality agreements, Salford and Sun Capital agreed, subject to certain exceptions, to keep confidential any non-public information provided by the Company. In addition, Salford and Sun Capital agreed to certain “standstill” provisions. On June 27, 2007, Compound, Sun Capital and the Company entered into a letter agreement, pursuant to which the Company permitted Sun Capital to share with Compound confidential information about the Company, and Compound agreed to be bound by the terms of the confidentiality agreement between Sun Capital and the Company.
The foregoing summary of the confidentiality agreements is qualified in its entirety by reference to the confidentiality agreements, each of which is incorporated herein by reference. A copy of each confidentiality agreement is filed as an exhibit to the Schedule TO. The confidentiality agreements may be examined and copies may be obtained in the manner set forth in Section 8 entitled “Certain Information Concerning the Company” of this Offer to Purchase.
| |
14. | DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS |
As discussed in Section 13 entitled “Transaction Documents” of this Offer to Purchase, the Merger Agreement provides that, between the date of the Merger Agreement and the date on which a majority of the Company’s directors are designees of Parent or Purchaser, without the prior written consent of Parent, the Company may not make, declare or pay any dividend, or make any other distribution with respect to, or directly or indirectly redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire or encumber, any Shares or any other securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or any securities convertible (whether currently convertible or convertible only after the passage of time or the occurrence of certain events) into or exchangeable for Shares or any other securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, except (x) in connection with cashless exercises or similar transactions pursuant to the exercise of Company stock options or other awards issued and outstanding as of the date hereof under the Company’s stock plans or permitted hereunder to be granted after the date hereof, (y) paid by subsidiaries of the Company in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or (z) Shares issued by the Company upon conversion of Preferred Shares in accordance with Section 8 of the certificate of designation.
82
| |
15. | CERTAIN CONDITIONS TO THE OFFER |
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Offer or the Merger Agreement, Purchaser will not be required to accept for payment or, subject to any applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, including Rule 14e-1(c) under the Exchange Act (relating to Purchaser’s obligation to pay for or return tendered Shares promptly after termination or withdrawal of the Offer), pay for, and (subject to any such rules or regulations) may, to the extent expressly permitted by the Merger Agreement, delay the acceptance for payment of any tendered Common Shares if (i) the number of Common Shares tendered and not withdrawn prior to the expiration of the Offer, as it may be extended in accordance with the Merger Agreement, is less than the sum of (x) 63,300,000 Common Shares plus (y) the total number of Common Shares, if any, issued or issuable (solely in the case of Common Shares issuable, such Common Shares issuable but not yet issued in response to any notice of election duly and validly given (and not subsequently withdrawn) by a holder to the Company on or prior to the Expiration Date to exercise a Company stock option or warrant or to convert Preferred Shares into Common Shares) after the date of the Agreement and prior to the Expiration Date (such number, the “Original Minimum Condition”), or (ii) any of the following events has occurred and is continuing as of any scheduled expiration date of the Offer:
| | |
| • | a governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has enacted, issued or entered any restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or similar order or legal restraint or prohibition which remains in effect that enjoins or otherwise prohibits consummation of the Offer, the Top-Up Option or the Merger; |
| | |
| • | the Merger Agreement has been terminated by the Company, Purchaser or Parent in accordance with its terms; |
| | |
| • | (i) any of the representations and warranties of the Company set forth in the Merger Agreement relating to the capitalization of the Company or the stockholder vote required to approve the Merger was not true and correct in all respects (except for, in the case of the representations and warranties relating to capitalization, inaccuracies that aredeminimis in the aggregate), in each case at and as of the date of the Merger Agreement and at and as of the Expiration Date as though made at and as of the Expiration Date (except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case as of such date), or (ii) any of the other representations and warranties of the Company set forth in the Merger Agreement was not true and correct, in each case at and as of the date of the Merger Agreement and at and as of the Expiration Date as though made at and as of the Expiration Date (except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case as of such date), except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect; |
83
| | |
| • | the Company has not performed in all material respects all obligations and complied with all covenants required by the Merger Agreement to be performed or complied with by it prior to the Expiration Date and such failure to perform has not been cured prior to the Expiration Date; or |
| | |
| • | since the execution of the Merger Agreement, there shall have occurred a Company Material Adverse Effect. |
The Merger Agreement provides further that Purchaser may on a single occasion decrease the Original Minimum Condition to a level not less than (x) 56,182,474 Common Shares plus (y) 50% of the total number of Common Shares, if any, issued or issuable (solely in the case of Common Shares issuable, such Common Shares issuable but not yet issued in response to any notice, duly and validly given (and not subsequently withdrawn) by a holder to the Company on or prior to the Expiration Date, of election to exercise a Company Stock Option or Warrant or to convert Preferred Shares) after the date of the Merger Agreement and prior to the Expiration Date (the “Lowered Minimum Condition”). The terms “Original Minimum Condition” and “Lowered Minimum Condition” are used as applicable and are collectively referred to as the “Minimum Condition” in this Offer to Purchase.
Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the foregoing conditions are for the sole benefit of Purchaser and may be asserted by Purchaser regardless of the circumstances giving rise to any such conditions (other than any such circumstances caused by or substantially contributed to by any breach by Parent or Purchaser of any of their representations, warranties, covenants agreements or obligations under the Merger Agreement) and may be waived by Purchaser in whole or in part at any time and from time to time, in each case except for the Minimum Condition, in the exercise of the reasonable good faith judgment of Purchaser and subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement. The failure by Purchaser at any time to exercise any of the foregoing rights shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right and each such right shall be deemed an ongoing right which may be asserted at any time and from time to time, in each case prior to the acceptance for payment of, and payment for, tendered Common Shares.
| |
16. | CERTAIN LEGAL MATTERS; REQUIRED REGULATORY APPROVALS |
General. Except as described in this Section 16, Parent and Purchaser are not aware of any approval or other action by any governmental, administrative or regulatory agency or authority that would be required for the acquisition or ownership of Shares by Purchaser or Parent as contemplated herein.
84
Antitrust.The transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement are not subject to the notification filing requirements under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
State Takeover Laws. A number of states (including Delaware, where the Company is incorporated) have adopted takeover laws and regulations which purport, to varying degrees, to be applicable to attempts to acquire securities of corporations which are incorporated in such states or which have substantial assets, stockholders, principal executive offices or principal places of business therein. To the extent that certain provisions of certain of these state takeover statutes purport to apply to the Offer or the Merger, Purchaser believes that such laws conflict with federal law and constitute an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce.
Section 203 of the DGCL prevents certain “business combinations” with an “interested stockholder” (generally, any person who owns or has the right to acquire 15 percent or more of a corporation’s outstanding voting stock) for a period of three years following the time such person became an interested stockholder, unless, among other things, prior to the time the interested stockholder became such, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction in which the interested stockholder became such. The Company board of directors has irrevocably taken all necessary steps to render the restrictions of Section 203 of the DGCL inapplicable to the Offer, the Merger, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Purchaser has not attempted to comply with any other state takeover statutes in connection with the Offer or the Merger. Purchaser reserves the right to challenge the validity or applicability of any state law allegedly applicable to the Offer, the Merger, the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby, and nothing in this Offer to Purchase nor any action taken in connection herewith is intended as a waiver of that right. In the event that it is asserted that one or more takeover statutes apply to the Offer or the Merger, and it is not determined by an appropriate court that such statute or statutes do not apply or are invalid as applied to the Offer, the Merger or the Merger Agreement, as applicable, Purchaser may be required to file certain documents with, or receive approvals from, the relevant state authorities, and Purchaser might be unable to accept for payment or purchase Common Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer or be delayed in continuing or consummating the Offer. In such case, Purchaser may not be obligated to accept for purchase, or pay for, any Common Shares tendered.
Exchange Act Registration. The Common Shares and the Preferred Shares are currently registered under the Exchange Act. Such registration may be revoked by the SEC in connection with the Company’s failure to file periodic reports or terminated by the Company, upon application to the SEC, if there are fewer than 300 record holders of Common Shares or Preferred Shares, as the case may be, following the consummation of the Offer. If the Company’s equity securities were deregistered under the Exchange Act,
85
all public trading in the Common Shares and the Preferred Shares, including the trading on the Pink Sheets, would immediately cease.
Moreover, the revocation or termination of the registration of the Company’s equity securities under the Exchange Act would cease the Company’s ongoing reporting obligations under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, which would substantially reduce the information required to be furnished by the Company to holders of Common Shares or Preferred Shares and to the SEC. However, the Merger Agreement provides that in such event the Company would continue to provide certain financial information to holders of the Preferred Shares on a quarterly and annual basis.
Such revocation or termination would also make certain provisions of the Exchange Act, such as the short-swing profit recovery provisions of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, the requirement to furnish a proxy statement in connection with stockholders’ meetings pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, and the requirements of Rule 13e-3 under the Exchange Act with respect to “going-private” transactions, inapplicable to the Company. In addition, “affiliates” of the Company and persons holding “restricted securities” of the Company may be deprived of the ability to dispose of such securities under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). See Section 7 entitled “Effect of the Offer on the Market for the Company’s Shares; Amex Delisting and Pink Sheets; Exchange Act Registration” of this Offer to Purchase.
No appraisal rights are available in connection with the Offer. However, if the Merger is consummated, at the effective time of the Merger, stockholders (other than those who tendered their Common Shares pursuant to the Offer) will have certain rights pursuant to the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL (the “Appraisal Provisions”) to dissent and demand appraisal of their Shares or Preferred Shares, as the case may be. Under the Appraisal Provisions, dissenting stockholders who comply with the applicable statutory procedures will be entitled to demand payment of fair value for their Common Shares or Preferred Shares, as the case may be. If a stockholder and the Surviving Corporation do not agree on such fair value, the stockholder will have the right to a judicial determination of the fair value of their Common Shares or Preferred Shares, as the case may be, as of the time of the Merger (excluding any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger), required to be paid in cash to such dissenting holders for their Common Shares or Preferred Shares, as applicable. In addition, such dissenting stockholders would be entitled to receive payment of a fair rate of interest from the date of consummation of the Merger on the amount determined to be the fair value of their Common Shares or Preferred Shares.
86
In determining fair value, the court is required to take into account all relevant factors. Accordingly, such determination could be based upon considerations other than, or in addition to, the price per share to be paid for the Common Shares in the Merger or the market value of the Common Shares or the Preferred Shares, including, among other things, asset values and earning capacity. InWeinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated, among other things, that “proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered in an appraisal proceeding. Therefore, the value so determined in any appraisal proceeding could be the same as, or more or less than, the purchase price per share of the Common Shares in the Offer or the Merger Consideration.
The foregoing summary of the Appraisal Provisions does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Appraisal Provisions. Failure to follow the steps required by the Appraisal Provisions for perfecting appraisal rights may result in the loss of such rights.
| |
18. | CERTAIN FEES AND EXPENSES |
Mellon Investor Services has been retained by Purchaser as Information Agent in connection with the Offer. The Information Agent may contact holders of Common Shares by mail, telephone, telex, telegraph and personal interview and may request brokers, dealers and other nominee stockholders to forward material relating to the Offer to beneficial owners. Customary compensation will be paid for all such services in addition to reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. Purchaser has agreed to indemnify the Information Agent against certain liabilities and expenses, including liabilities under the federal securities laws.
Mellon Investor Services has also been retained by Purchaser as the Depositary. The Depositary has not been retained to make solicitations or recommendations in its role as Depositary. The Depositary will receive reasonable and customary compensation for its services in connection with the Offer, will be reimbursed for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, and will be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses in connection therewith.
Except as set forth above, Purchaser will not pay any fees or commissions to any broker, dealer or other person (other than the Information Agent) for soliciting tenders of Common Shares pursuant to the Offer. Brokers, dealers, commercial banks and trust companies and other nominees will, upon request, be reimbursed by Purchaser for customary clerical and mailing expenses incurred by them in forwarding materials to their customers.
87
The Offer is being made solely by this Offer to Purchase and the related Letter of Transmittal and is being made to all holders of the Common Shares (excluding Common Shares beneficially owned by Parent or Purchaser). This Offer is not being made to (nor will tenders be accepted from or on behalf of) holders of Common Shares in any jurisdiction in which the making of this Offer or the acceptance thereof would not be in compliance with the securities or other laws of such jurisdiction. Purchaser is not aware of any jurisdiction where the making of the Offer is prohibited by any administrative or judicial action pursuant to any valid state statute. If Purchaser becomes aware of any valid state statute prohibiting the making of the Offer or the acceptance of the Common Shares pursuant thereto, Purchaser will make a good faith effort to comply with such state statute. If, after such good faith effort Purchaser cannot comply with any such state statute, the Offer will not be made to (nor will tenders be accepted from or on behalf of) the holders of Common Shares in such state. In those jurisdictions where the applicable laws require that the Offer be made by a licensed broker or dealer, the Offer shall be deemed to be made on behalf of Purchaser by one or more registered brokers or dealers licensed under the laws of such jurisdiction.
NO PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF PURCHASER NOT CONTAINED IN THIS OFFER TO PURCHASE OR IN THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL, AND IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED.
Parent and Purchaser have filed with the SEC a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO, together with exhibits, pursuant to Rule 14d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act, furnishing certain additional information with respect to the Offer, and may file amendments thereto. Such Schedule TO and any amendments thereto, including exhibits, may be examined and copies may be obtained from the same places and in the same manner as set forth in Section 8 entitled “Certain Information Concerning the Company” of this Offer to Purchase.
CAUCUSCOM MERGERCO CORP.
CAUCUSCOM VENTURES L.P.
JULY 18, 2007
88
Schedule I
INFORMATION CONCERNING MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AND THE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF PARENT AND PURCHASER AND
CONTROLLING AFFILIATES
Set forth below are the name, business address and current principal occupation or employment, and material occupations, positions, offices or employment for the past five years, of the directors and officers of Parent and Purchaser and their noteworthy affiliates. The business address of each person listed below is CaucusCom Ventures L.P., c/o Salford, Norfolk House, 31 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4JJ, United Kingdom.
The officers and directors of Purchaser are Mr. Peter Nagle, President and Mr. Graydon Philip Bellingan, Secretary. Parent is the sole stockholder of Purchaser. The general partner of Parent is Caucus Carry Management L.P., a British Virgin Islands limited partnership. The general partner of Caucus Carry Management L.P. is Caucus Telecom Management Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company. The members of the board of directors of Caucus Telecom Management Ltd. are Messrs. Graydon Philip Bellingan, William Alan McIntosh, Peter Nagle, and Irakli Rukhadze.
None of the persons listed below has, during the past five years, (i) been convicted in a criminal proceeding or (ii) been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, U.S. federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of U.S. federal or state securities laws.
None of the persons listed below (i) owns either beneficially or of record, or has contractual right to acquire, any securities of the Company, or (ii) has benefited from any transaction in any securities of the Company during the past two years, or (iii) has any contracts or arrangements with regard to any securities of the Company.
| | |
Name | | Current Principal Occupation or Employment and Five-Year Employment History |
| | |
Graydon Philip Bellingan | | Currently, Mr. Bellingan serves as the Secretary of Purchaser and a member of the board of Caucus Telecom Management Ltd., the general partner of Caucus Carry Management L.P., the general partner of Parent. Since November 2006, Mr. Bellingan has been an Associate at Sun Capital Partners Ltd., a U.K.-based company specializing in private investments. From May 2003 to November 2006, Mr. Bellingan was Executive Director of UBS AG in Zurich. From May 1999 to April 2003, Mr. Bellingan was a Director at Capco Group Holdings Ltd. Mr. Bellingan is a U.K. and South African citizen. |
| | |
William Alan McIntosh | | Currently, Mr. McIntosh serves as a member of the board of Caucus Telecom Management Ltd., the general partner of Caucus Carry Management L.P., the general partner of Parent. Mr. McIntosh is one of the founders and Executive Director of Pearl Group Ltd., and has held this position since 2003. From |
i
| | |
| | 2001 to 2003, Mr. McIntosh has been a director of Sun Capital Partners Ltd., a U.K.-based company specializing in private investments. Mr. McIntosh is a U.K. citizen. |
| | |
Irakli Rukhadze | | Currently, Mr. Rukhadze serves as a Managing Director of Salford Georgia, the local Georgian office of Salford Capital Partners Inc., an international private equity and investment firm based in the British Virgin Islands. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Rukhadze was one of the founders of and partner at Argo Ventures LLC, a venture capital advisory firm focused on the technology and telecommunications industries. Mr. Rukhadze is a U.S. citizen. |
| | |
Peter Nagle | | Currently, Mr. Nagle serves as President of Purchaser and a member of the board of Caucus Telecom Management Ltd., the general partner of Caucus Carry Management L.P., the general partner of Parent. From 2002 to present, Mr. Nagle has served as a partner and Chief Investment Officer of Salford Capital Partners Inc., an international private equity and investment firm based in the British Virgin Islands. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Nagle served as a Director of Investment Banking at Merrill Lynch in London. Mr Nagle is a U.S. citizen. |
ii