modified term loan, the Company provided the Bank a first priority security interest in all equipment other than the rental fleet that the Company owns. In addition, the Company provided a first mortgage on the property at the following locations: 3409 Campground Road, 6709, 7023, 7025, 7101, 7103 and 7110 Grade Lane, Louisville Kentucky, 1565 East Fourth Street, Seymour, Indiana and 1617 State Road 111, New Albany, Indiana. The Company also cross collateralized the term loan with the revolving credit facility, the rental fleet loan, the $500,000 purchasing credit card commitment and all other existing debt the Company owes to the Bank.
In the Loan Agreement, the Company agreed to certain covenants, including the maintenance of minimum tangible net worth of $16,000,000 as of December 31, 2009 (increasing by 40% of after tax net income annually, plus 100% of new equity issued by the Company), maintenance of a ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) to the sum of the preceding 12 months interest expense plus projected principal payments on long-term debt in the next succeeding 12 months of not less than 1.25 to 1, and maintenance of a ratio of debt to tangible net worth of not more than 3.5 to 1.
In the financial statements and accompanying notes, we are presenting the current maturities of long term debt and the long term debt reflecting the impact of the refinancing.
As of March 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all three restrictive covenants related to our debt.
We expect that existing cash flow from operations and available credit under our restructured credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for the next year and beyond.
The following table presents, for the years indicated, the percentage relationship that certain captioned items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations bear to total revenues and other pertinent data:
Three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to three months ended March 31, 2009
Total revenue increased $49,919,043 or 205.9% to $74,168,966 in 2010 compared to $24,249,923 in 2009. Recycling revenue increased $51,017,599 or 242.4% to $72,069,234 in 2010 compared to $21,051,635 in 2009. This is primarily due to an increase of 82.8% in volume of stainless steel materials, a 192.7% increase in volume of ferrous materials and a 206.4% increase in volume of non-ferrous materials, and an average increase in price of 63.4%. Waste Services revenue decreased $1,098,556 or 34.3% to $2,099,732 in 2010 compared to $3,198,288 in 2009 primarily due to a decrease of approximately 1,500 customer locations as well as a $53,404 decrease in rental and baling wire revenue and a $7,500 decrease in VISA rebates, partially offset by a $50,015 increase in equipment sales, service and repairs revenue.
Total cost of goods sold increased $47,620,390 or 235.0% to $67,885,508 in 2010 compared to $20,265,118 in 2009. Recycling cost of goods sold increased $48,508,044 or 272.5% to $66,311,974 in 2010 compared to $17,803,930 in 2009. This is primarily due to the increases in shipments noted above and 110.7% higher commodity purchase prices. Waste services cost of goods sold decreased $887,654 or 36.1% to $1,573,534 in 2010 compared to $2,461,188 in 2009 primarily due to the decrease in customer locations, partially offset by an increase of $37,356 in cost of equipment sales.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $491,361 or 18.1% to $3,201,022 in 2010 compared to $2,709,661 in 2009. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses were 4.3% in 2010 compared to 11.2% in 2009. The primary drivers of the increase in total expenses are increases in management stock bonuses of $166,900, and bonuses of $422,800, offset by decreases in license taxes and fees of $70,404, legal expenses of $55,261 and bad debt expense of $54,970.
Other expense decreased $41,378 to other expense of $143,661 in 2010 compared to other expense of $185,039 in 2009. This was primarily due to an increase in the gain on sale of assets of $180,898 and a decrease in legal settlements of $65,597, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $190,474.
Income tax provision increased $739,469 to $1,175,511 in 2010 compared to $436,042 in 2009. The effective tax rate in 2010 and 2009 was 40.0% based on federal and state statutory rates.
Financial condition at March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009
Cash and cash equivalents increased $422,589 to $1,135,651 as of March 31, 2010 compared to $713,062 as of December 31, 2009.
Net cash from operating activities was $4,238,492 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. This was primarily due to the combination of increased sales, purchases, and pricing, resulting in an increase of $9,674,527 in accounts payable and a decrease of $6,573,748 in inventories, offset by a $15,519,922 increase in accounts receivable.
We used net cash from investing activities of $240,564 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. We used $40,922 for road and building improvements. We purchased recycling and rental fleet equipment,
25
shredder system equipment, and shearer parts of $125,885. The rental fleet equipment consists of solid waste handling and recycling equipment such as compactors, containers and balers. It is our intention to continue to pursue this market. Additionally, we spent $358,232 on accounting software. We received $185,000 from sales of our rental fleet compactors, balers, and containers and $89,512 from the sale of one of our trucks.
We used net cash from financing activities of $3,575,339 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is primarily due to advances of $1,086,554 offset by payments on debt of $4,643,569.
Accounts receivable trade increased $15,519,922 or 182.3% to $24,032,248 as of March 31, 2010 compared to $8,512,326 as of December 31, 2009. This change is due to increased sales in the first quarter and the timing of customer payments.
Inventories consist principally of stainless steel, ferrous and nonferrous scrap materials and waste equipment machinery held for resale. We value inventory at the lower of cost or market. Inventory decreased $6,573,748 or 24.9% to $19,852,863 as of March 31, 2010 compared to $26,426,611 as of December 31, 2009. The primary reason for the decrease in inventory was that the increases in the volume of shipments of all materials in the first quarter were higher than the increases in the volume of purchases of all materials in the first quarter.
Inventory aging for the period ended March 31, 2010 (Days Outstanding):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | 1-30 | | 31-60 | | 61-90 | | Over 90 | | Total | |
Stainless steel alloys | | $ | 11,391,331 | | $ | 1,572,458 | | $ | 14,862 | | $ | 519,708 | | $ | 13,498,359 | |
Ferrous materials | | | 3,010,275 | | | 175,077 | | | 25,948 | | | 48,404 | | | 3,259,704 | |
Non-ferrous materials | | | 1,939,794 | | | 93,819 | | | 47,469 | | | 99,191 | | | 2,180,273 | |
Shredder replacement parts | | | 761,125 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 761,125 | |
Waste equipment machinery | | | 5,500 | | | — | | | — | | | 54,450 | | | 59,950 | |
Other | | | 93,452 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 93,452 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 17,201,477 | | $ | 1,841,354 | | $ | 88,279 | | $ | 721,753 | | $ | 19,852,863 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Inventory aging for the year ended December 31, 2009 (Days Outstanding):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | 1-30 | | 31-60 | | 61-90 | | Over 90 | | Total | |
Stainless steel alloys | | $ | 11,738,653 | | $ | 2,564,183 | | $ | 5,170,224 | | $ | 2,075,954 | | $ | 21,549,014 | |
Ferrous materials | | | 1,513,849 | | | 47,151 | | | 19,834 | | | 6,641 | | | 1,587,475 | |
Non-ferrous materials | | | 1,801,125 | | | 243,708 | | | 47,545 | | | 126,759 | | | 2,219,137 | |
Shredder replacement parts | | | 879,831 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 879,831 | |
Waste equipment machinery | | | 9,670 | | | — | | | — | | | 92,362 | | | 102,032 | |
Other | | | 89,122 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 89,122 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 16,032,250 | | $ | 2,855,042 | | $ | 5,237,603 | | $ | 2,301,716 | | $ | 26,426,611 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Accounts payable trade increased $9,674,527 or 206.5% to $14,358,913 as of March 31, 2010 compared to $4,684,386 as of December 31, 2009, primarily due to increased purchases in the first quarter and the timing of payments made to our vendors.
Working capital increased $14,989,877 to $26,308,562 as of March 31, 2010 compared to
26
$11,318,685 as of December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily driven by the debt restructuring, which reclassified $21.1 million in current maturities to long-term debt, and the $15.5 million increase in accounts receivable. These increases were partially offset by the $6.6 million decrease in inventory, the $9.7 million increase in accounts payable, the $0.5 million increase in income taxes payable, and the $0.3 million increase in the bonus accrual.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides information with respect to our known contractual obligations for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Obligation Description | | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 3-5 years | | More than 5 years | |
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations | | $ | 30,637,355 | | $ | 1,321,413 | | $ | 3,022,651 | | $ | 26,293,291 | | $ | — | |
Capital Lease Obligations (1) | | | 2,474 | | | 2,474 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Operating Lease Obligations (2) | | | 1,770,847 | | | 657,847 | | | 1,113,000 | | | — | | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 32,410,676 | | $ | 1,981,734 | | $ | 4,135,651 | | $ | 26,293,291 | | $ | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | |
| (1) | We lease various pieces of equipment that qualify for capital lease treatment. These lease arrangements require monthly lease payments expiring at various dates through June 2010. |
| | |
| (2) | We lease the Louisville, Kentucky facility from K&R, LLC, the sole member of which is Harry Kletter, our chief executive officer, under an operating lease expiring December 2012. We have monthly rental payments of $48,500 through December 2012. In the event of a change of control, the monthly payments become $62,500. |
| | |
| | We have subleased the Lexington property to an unaffiliated third party for a term commencing March 1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2012 for $4,500 per month. We currently lease this property from an unrelated party for $4,500 per month; the lease terminates December 31, 2012. If for any reason the sub-lessee defaults, we remain liable for the remainder of the lease payments through December 31, 2012. |
| | |
| | We also lease a management services operations facility and various pieces of equipment in Dallas, Texas for which monthly payments of $969 are due through September 2010. |
Long-term debt, including the current portions thereof, decreased $3,557,015 to $30,637,355 as of March 31, 2010 compared to $34,194,370 as of December 31, 2009.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In March 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities and updated this guidance in February 2010 through guidance entitled “Technical Corrections to Various Topics”. The March 2008 guidance amends and expands the disclosure requirements in the previously issued guidance on accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, the year beginning January 1, 2009 for us. The February 2010 update is effective for the first reporting period beginning after issuance, the year ending December 31, 2009 for us. We have included the required disclosures in Note 4 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on subsequent events, but this guidance was amended by new authoritative guidance issued in February, 2010. The original guidance required the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that
27
date—that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The new guidance removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date in both issued and revise financial statements. This amendment removes potential conflicts with SEC requirements. The original guidance became effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, the quarter ending June 30, 2009 for us, and the amendment became effective upon issuance of the final update in February, 2010.
The FASB issued authoritative guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets in June 2009 with an update issued in December 2009. This guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009, the year ending December 31, 2010 for us. This new guidance limits the circumstances in which a financial asset may be de-recognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire financial asset or has continuing involvement with the transferred asset. The concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, which had previously facilitated sale accounting for certain asset transfers, is removed by this new guidance. The adoption of this new guidance did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
The FASB issued authoritative guidance on accounting for variable interest entities (VIE) in June 2009 with an update issued in December 2009. This guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009, the year ending December 2010 for us. This guidance changes the process for how an enterprise determines which party consolidates a VIE, to a primarily qualitative analysis. The party that consolidates the VIE (the primary beneficiary) is defined as the party with (1) the power to direct activities of the VIE that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE. Upon adoption, reporting enterprises must reconsider their conclusions on whether an entity should be consolidated and should a change result, the effect on net assets will be recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings. The adoption of this new guidance did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance entitled “Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash” to address and eliminate the diversity in practice related to the accounting for a distribution to shareholders that offers them the ability to elect to receive their entire distribution in cash or shares of equivalent value with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate. The amendments in this update clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per share prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). Those distributions should be accounted for and included in earnings per share calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25-14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments in this update are effective on a retrospective basis for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, the year ending December 31, 2009 for us. The adoption of this new guidance did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
28
| |
ITEM 3: | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. |
Fluctuating commodity prices affect market risk in our recycling segment. We mitigate this risk by selling our product on a monthly contract basis. Each month we negotiate selling prices for all commodities. Based on these monthly agreements, we determine purchase prices based on a margin needed to cover processing and administrative expenses.
We are exposed to commodity price risk, mainly associated with variations in the market price for ferrous and nonferrous metal, and other commodities. The timing and magnitude of industry cycles are difficult to predict and are impacted by general economic conditions. We respond to changes in recycled metal selling prices by adjusting purchase prices on a timely basis and by turning rather than holding inventory in expectation of higher prices. However, financial results may be negatively impacted where selling prices fall more quickly than purchase price adjustments can be made or when levels of inventory have an anticipated net realizable value that is below average cost.
Our floating rate borrowings expose us to interest rate risk. On June 30, 2009, we executed a promissory note, loan agreement and related security documents with BB&T in the amount of $5,000,000 for the purpose of financing our ongoing growth. On October 15, 2009, we executed a note modification agreement for this note, which extended the maturity date to December 15, 2009. On December 21, 2009, we executed a note modification agreement, which extended the maturity date until March 15, 2010. On March 12, 2010, we executed a commitment letter to, among other things, amend this financing through April 7, 2014. On April 13, 2010, we entered into a Loan Agreement with BB&T and BB&T Bankcard Corporation pursuant to which the Bank agreed to provide the Company a revolving credit facility in the amount of $20,000,000 for the purpose of replacing the Company’s existing $12,000,000 promissory note to the Bank and the Company’s existing $10,000,000 senior revolving credit facility with the Bank. In addition, Company, the Bank and certain other parties entered into a Modification and Cross-Collateralization Agreement pursuant to which the Company and the Bank modified the Company’s existing $5,000,000 term loan to the Bank. Proceeds of the new revolving credit facility in the amount of $17.7 million were used to repay the outstanding principal balance of the $12,000,000 promissory note and the amount outstanding under the prior credit facility and to pay closing costs. See Note 1 – Subsequent Events in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the new loan agreement and modification of the $5,000,000 term loan.
Prior to the new loan agreement, this non-revolving credit facility bore interest at the month LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum, which was to be adjusted monthly on the first day of each month for each LIBOR interest period with a minimum interest rate of 4.5%. The interest rate as of March 31, 2010 was 4.5%. This credit facility had $4,987,686 in outstanding borrowings as of March 31, 2010. We also maintained a $10.0 million senior revolving credit facility with the BB&T which had $6,747,785 in outstanding borrowings as of March 31, 2010. This revolving credit facility bore interest at the one month LIBOR rate, as published in the Wall Street Journal, plus two and twenty-five one-hundredths percent (2.25%) per annum, which was 2.4986% as of March 31, 2010. On February 11, 2009, we executed a promissory note with BB&T in the amount of $12,000,000 which had $9,691,146 in outstanding borrowings as of March 31, 2010. This note bore interest at the adjusted LIBOR rate of one month LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum with a floor of 4%. As of March 31, 2010, the applicable interest rate was 4%. Based on our average anticipated borrowings under our credit
29
agreements in fiscal 2010, a hypothetical increase or decrease in the LIBOR rate by 1% would increase or decrease interest expense on our variable borrowings by 1% of the outstanding balance, with a corresponding change in cash flows.
We entered into three interest rate swap agreements swapping variable rates for fixed rates. The first swap agreement covers $5.6 million in debt and commenced April 7, 2009 and matures on April 7, 2014. The second swap agreement covers approximately $2.6 million in debt and commenced October 15, 2008 and matures on May 7, 2013. The third swap agreement covers approximately $547,000 in debt and commenced October 22, 2008 and matures on October 22, 2013. The three swap agreements fix our interest rate at approximately 5.8%. At March 31, 2010, we recorded the estimated fair value of the three swaps as approximately $620,000. Accounting rules require us to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at estimated fair value. We have designated these agreements as a cash flow hedge.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates in the normal course of business. Our interest income and expense are most sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates and the LIBOR rate. In order to manage this exposure, we use a combination of debt instruments, including the use of derivatives in the form of interest rate swap agreements. We do not enter into any derivatives for trading purposes. The use of the interest rate swap agreement is intended to convert the variable rate to a fixed rate.
| |
ITEM 4(T): | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
| |
(a) | Disclosure controls and procedures. |
ISA’s management, including ISA’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, ISA’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that ISA files under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specific in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to ISA’s management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
| |
(b) | Internal controls over financial reporting. |
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
30
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
-- pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets;
-- provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
-- provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting cannot prevent or detect every potential misstatement. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurances with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may decline.
| |
(c) | Changes to internal control over financial reporting |
With the exception noted below, there were no changes in ISA’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect ISA’s internal control over financial reporting.
During 2009, ISA purchased a new recycling system software package from a third party vendor, and began using it for our Alloys operations in April, 2009. ISA installed this new software in the New Albany, Seymour, and Campground Road recycling satellite locations on October, 1, 2009. ISA installed this new software in the Grade Lane location on January 4, 2010.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
| |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
| |
| On January 4, 2007, Lennox Industries, Inc., a commercial heating and air-conditioning manufacturer, filed a suit against us inLennox Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Services of America, Inc., Case No. CV-2007-004 in the Arkansas County, Arkansas Circuit court in Stuttgart, Arkansas. Lennox in its Second Amended Complaint currently alleges breach of contract, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty arising from our alleged miscategorization of Lennox’s scrap metal and mismanagement of the scrap metal recycling operations at three Lennox plants during the contract period April 18, 2001 through November 2005. |
31
| |
| We filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in October, 2009, which the court denied in February, 2010. Discovery by the parties is still ongoing. There are currently no dates set for either a mediation or a jury trial. We are vigorously defending all of Lennox’s claims as we believe the claims to be without merit. |
| |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
| |
| We have had no material changes from the risk factors reported in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22, 2010. |
| |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
| |
| On November 15, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to 200,000 shares of our common stock at current market prices. No shares were repurchased in 2010 or 2009. In 2008, we repurchased 55,607 shares. In 2007 we repurchased 40,000 shares, in 2006 we repurchased 5,509 shares and in 2005 we repurchased 10,000 shares. |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mar-08 | | 19,753 | | | $ | 8.2823 | | 75,262 | | | 124,738 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jun-08 | | 9,854 | | | $ | 11.4169 | | 85,116 | | | 114,884 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sept-08 | | 26,000 | | | $ | 9.7902 | | 111,116 | | | 88,884 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Item 3. | Defaults upon Senior Securities |
| |
| None. |
| |
Item 4. | Reserved. |
| |
Item 5. | Other Information |
| |
| None |
| |
Item 6. | Exhibits |
| |
| See exhibit index. |
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| INDUSTRIAL SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC. |
| | |
Date: May 10, 2010 | /s/ Harry Kletter | |
|
| |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) |
| | |
| | |
Date: May 10, 2010 | /s/ Alan L. Schroering | |
|
| |
| Chief Financial Officer | |
33
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibits |
| |
|
| | |
10.1 | | Loan Agreement, dated April 13, 2010, in the amount of $20,000,000 from ISA in favor of Branch Banking and Trust Company and BB&T Bankcard Corporation of North Carolina. |
| | |
10.2 | | Schedule “DD” to BB&T Loan Agreement. |
| | |
10.3 | | Promissory Note, dated April 13, 2010, in the amount of $20,000,000 payable to Branch Banking and Trust Company. |
| | |
10.4 | | Addendum to Promissory Note dated April 13, 2010. |
| | |
10.5 | | Modification and Cross-Collateralization Agreement, dated April 13, 2010, among ISA, ISA Real Estate, LLC, ISA Indiana Real Estate, LLC, 7021 Grade Lane, LLC and Branch Banking and Trust Company. |
| | |
10.6 | | ISA Asset Purchase Agreement, dated July 1, 2010, by and between ISA and Venture Metals, LLC, of Florida. |
| | |
10.7 | | Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated April 1, 2010, by and between ISA and Brian Donaghy. |
| | |
10.8 | | Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated July 1, 2010, by and between ISA and Steve Jones. |
| | |
10.9 | | Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated July 1, 2010, by and between ISA and Jeff Valentine. |
| | |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Harry Kletter for the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. |
| | |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Alan Schroering for the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. |
| | |
32.1 | | Section 1350 Certification of Harry Kletter and Alan Schroering for the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. |
34