6709, 7023, 7025, 7101, 7103, 7110, 7124, 7200 and 7210 Grade Lane, Louisville Kentucky, 1565 East Fourth Street, Seymour, Indiana and 1617 State Road 111, New Albany, Indiana. The Company also cross collateralized the term loan with the revolving credit facility and all other existing debt the Company owes to the Bank.
In the Credit Agreement, we agreed to certain covenants, including (i) maintenance of a ratio of debt to adjusted EBITDA for the preceding 12 months of not more than 3.5 to 1 (or, if measured as of December 31 of any fiscal year, 4.0 to 1), (ii) maintenance of a ratio of adjusted EBITDA for the preceding twelve months to aggregate cash payments of interest expense and scheduled payment of principal in the preceding 12 months of not less than 1.20 to 1, and (iii) a limitation on capital expenditures of $4,000,000 in any fiscal year.
As of June 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all restrictive covenants related to our debt.
We expect that existing cash flow from operations and available credit under our restructured credit facilities and other alternative financing will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for the next year and beyond. As of June 30, 2010, we have $1,141,029 committed for the purchase and installation of sensor sorter units to be funded by our line of credit.
The following table presents, for the years indicated, the percentage relationship that certain captioned items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations bear to total revenues and other pertinent data:
Total revenue increased $103,609,691 or 163.5% to $166,983,928 in 2010 compared to $63,374,237 in 2009. Recycling revenue increased $104,652,902 or 180.0% to $162,804,794 in 2010 compared to $58,151,892 in 2009. This is primarily due to the improvements and expansions of our Grade Lane facilities made in late 2009 and the increased production from the shredder, which began production in July 2009, along with a 39.2% increase in volume of stainless steel materials shipments, a 175.3% increase in volume of ferrous materials shipments, a 24.1% increase in volume of other nonferrous materials shipments, partially offset by an average increase in cost of commodities shipped of 78.8%. Waste Services revenue decreased $1,043,211 or 20.0% to $4,179,134 in 2010 compared to $5,222,345 in 2009 primarily due to the net loss of approximately
1,300 customer locations, as well as an $88,623 decrease in rental revenue and VISA rebates, partially offset by a $123,870 increase in equipment and parts sales and service and repairs revenue.
Total cost of goods sold increased $97,708,445 or 176.9% to $152,946,806 in 2010 compared to $55,238,361 in 2009. Recycling cost of goods sold increased $98,279,681 or 191.1% to $149,711,008 in 2009 compared to $51,431,327 in 2009. This is primarily due to the increase in volume of shipments noted above, and partially due to the increase in commodity prices noted above. Waste Services cost of goods sold decreased $571,236 or 15.0% to $3,235,798 in 2010 compared to $3,807,034 in 2009 primarily due to the decrease in customer locations and a $29,488 decrease in rental, hauling, and wire costs, partially offset by an increase of $91,425 in cost of equipment and parts sales, service and repairs, and commissions.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1,615,749 or 31.4% to $6,765,293 in 2010 compared to $5,149,544 in 2009. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses were 4.1% in 2010 compared to 8.1% in 2009. The primary drivers of the increase in total expense are an increase in stock bonus and bonus expense of $896,003, an increase in labor/management-related expenses (labor, consulting, management fees, employee training, and insurance benefits) of $292,781, an increase in legal fees, insurance expense, and compliance and reporting expenses of $234,349, and an increase in operating supplies and computer software and equipment of $119,633, partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense of $57,715.
Other expense increased $61,845 to other expense of $421,055 in 2010 compared to other expense of $359,210 in 2009. This was primarily due to an increase in interest expense of $316,945, partially offset by an increase in the gain on sale of assets of $223,176.
Income tax provision decreased $1,689,461 to $2,740,310 in 2010 compared to $1,050,849 in 2009. The effective tax rate in 2010 and 2009 was 40.0% based on federal and state statutory rates.
Three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to three months ended June 30, 2009
Total revenue increased $53,690,648 or 137.2% to $92,814,962 in 2010 compared to $39,124,314 in 2009. Recycling revenue increased $53,635,303 or 144.6% to $90,735,560 in 2010 compared to $37,100,257 in 2009. This is primarily due to the improvements and expansions of our Grade Lane facilities made in late 2009, the increased production from the shredder, which began production in July 2009, and an increase in stainless steel shipments of 13.1%, an increase in ferrous shipments of 164.0% and an increase in other nonferrous shipments of 8.7% and an average increase in cost of commodities shipped of 91.6%. Waste Services revenue increased $55,345 or 2.7% to $2,079,402 in 2010 compared to $2,024,057 in 2009 primarily due to a $72,755 increase in equipment sales and service and repairs revenue, partially offset by a $40,307 decrease in rental revenue.
Total cost of goods sold increased $50,088,055 or 143.2% to $85,061,298 in 2010 compared to $34,973,243 in 2009. Recycling cost of goods sold increased $49,771,637 or 148.0% to $83,399,034 in 2010 compared to $33,627,397 in 2009. This is primarily due to the increase in volume of shipments noted above, and partially due to the increase in commodity prices noted above. Waste Services cost of goods sold increased $316,418 or 23.5% to $1,662,264 in 2010 compared to $1,345,846 in 2009 primarily due to a decrease of $357,204 in bankruptcy-related write offs in 2010 compared to 2009 and an increase of $46,022 in the cost of equipment sales and service and repairs, partially offset by the decrease in customer locations.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1,124,388 or 46.1% to $3,564,271 in 2010 compared to $2,439,883 in 2009. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses were 3.8% in 2010 compared to 6.2% in 2009. The primary drivers of the increase in total expense are increases in stock bonus and bonus expense of $621,303, and labor/management-related expenses (labor, consulting, management
24
fees, employee training and insurance benefits) of $303,598.
Other expense increased $103,223 to other expense of $277,394 in 2010 compared to other expense of $174,171 in 2009 primarily due to the increase in interest expense due to new debt.
Income tax provision increased $949,992 to $1,564,799 in 2010 compared to $614,807 in 2009. The effective tax rate in 2010 and 2009 was 40.0% based on federal and state statutory rates.
Financial condition at June 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009
Cash and cash equivalents increased $469,937 to $1,182,999 as of June 30, 2010 compared to $713,062 as of December 31, 2009.
Net cash from operating activities of $5,723,699 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable, partially offset by the increase in accounts payable and the decrease in inventory. The increases in accounts receivable and accounts payable are due to a combination of increased shipments, purchases, and commodity prices.
We used net cash from investing activities of $1,308,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. We used $254,047 for road and building improvements. We purchased recycling and rental fleet equipment, shredder system equipment, and shearer parts of $751,496. The rental fleet equipment consists of solid waste handling and recycling equipment such as compactors, containers and balers. It is our intention to continue to pursue this market. Additionally, we spent $115,634 on accounting software and computer equipment. We also purchased one truck and upgraded another for $26,657. We received $234,500 from sales of our rental fleet compactors, balers, and containers and $89,513 from the sale of one of our trucks. We paid deposits of $504,244 on machinery and equipment.
We used net cash from financing activities of $3,945,762 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to the payments on debt and capital lease obligations of $3,924,946 and $20,798, respectively.
Accounts receivable trade increased $19,275,312 to $27,787,638 as of June 30, 2010 compared to $8,512,326 as of December 31, 2009. This change is due to a combination of increased shipments and an increase in commodity prices.
Inventories consist principally of stainless steel, ferrous and nonferrous scrap materials and waste equipment machinery held for resale. We value inventory at the lower of cost or market. Inventory decreased $611,116 or 2.3% to $25,815,495 as of June 30, 2010 compared to $26,426,611 as of December 31, 2009. The primary reason for the decrease was that the average cost of commodities shipped out of inventory year-to-date was higher than the average cost of commodities purchased year-to-date.
25
Inventory aging for the period ended June 30, 2010 (Days Outstanding):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | 1-30 | | 31-60 | | 61-90 | | Over 90 | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stainless steel alloys | | $ | 16,114,860 | | $ | 2,555,900 | | $ | 834,754 | | $ | 653,745 | | $ | 20,159,259 | |
Ferrous materials | | | 1,765,372 | | | 284,056 | | | 123,064 | | | 95,811 | | | 2,268,303 | |
Non-ferrous materials | | | 1,886,893 | | | 291,748 | | | 80,457 | | | 162,022 | | | 2,421,120 | |
Shredder replacement parts | | | 882,682 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 882,682 | |
Waste equipment machinery | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 54,950 | | | 54,950 | |
Other | | | 29,181 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 29,181 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 20,678,988 | | $ | 3,131,704 | | $ | 1,038,275 | | $ | 966,528 | | $ | 25,815,495 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory aging for the period ended December 31, 2009 (Days Outstanding): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | 1-30 | | 31-60 | | 61-90 | | Over 90 | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stainless steel alloys | | $ | 11,738,653 | | $ | 2,564,183 | | $ | 5,170,224 | | $ | 2,075,954 | | $ | 21,549,014 | |
Ferrous materials | | | 1,513,849 | | | 47,151 | | | 19,834 | | | 6,641 | | | 1,587,475 | |
Non-ferrous materials | | | 1,801,125 | | | 243,708 | | | 47,545 | | | 126,759 | | | 2,219,137 | |
Shredder replacement parts | | | 879,831 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 879,831 | |
Waste equipment machinery | | | 9,670 | | | — | | | — | | | 92,362 | | | 102,032 | |
Other | | | 89,122 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 89,122 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 16,032,250 | | $ | 2,855,042 | | $ | 5,237,603 | | $ | 2,301,716 | | $ | 26,426,611 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Accounts payable trade increased $18,064,308 or 385.6% to $22,748,694 as of June 30, 2010 compared to $4,684,386 as of December 31, 2009, primarily due to increased purchases and an increase in commodity prices.
Working capital increased $16,713,539 to $28,032,224 as of June 30, 2010 compared to $11,318,685 as of December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily driven by the $19.3 million increase in accounts receivable, the debt restructuring, which reclassified $16.1 million in current maturities to long-term debt, and the $0.8 million decrease in the bonus accrual. These increases were partially offset by the $18.1 million increase in accounts payable, the $0.8 million increase in income taxes payable, and the $0.6 million decrease in inventory.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides information with respect to our known contractual obligations for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Obligation Description | | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 3-5 years | | More than 5 years | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Debt Obligations | | $ | 30,269,406 | | $ | 1,478,788 | | $ | 21,019,319 | | $ | 7,771,299 | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Lease Obligations (1) | | | 1,603,261 | | | 649,261 | | | 954,000 | | | — | | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 31,872,667 | | $ | 2,128,049 | | $ | 21,973,319 | | $ | 7,771,299 | | $ | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
26
(1) We lease the Louisville, Kentucky facility from K&R, LLC, the sole member of which is Harry Kletter, our chief executive officer, under an operating lease expiring December 2012. We have monthly rental payments of $48,500 through December 2012. In the event of a change of control, the monthly payments become $62,500. We have subleased the Lexington property to an unaffiliated third party for a term commencing March 1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2012 for $4,500 per month. We currently lease this property from an unrelated party for $4,500 per month; the lease terminates December 31, 2012. If for any reason the sub-lessee defaults, we remain liable for the remainder of the lease payments through December 31, 2012.
We also lease a management services operations facility and various pieces of equipment in Dallas, Texas for which monthly payments of $969 are due through September 2010.
Long-term debt, including the current portions thereof, increased $1,075,036 to $30,269,406 as of June 30, 2010 compared to $29,194,370 as of December 31, 2009.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In 2008 the FASB issued authoritative guidance on disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities and updated this guidance in February 2010 through guidance entitled “Technical Corrections to Various Topics”. The guidance amends and expands the disclosure requirements in the previously issued guidance on accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and was effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, the year beginning January 1, 2009 for us. The February 2010 update was effective for the first reporting period beginning after issuance, the year ending December 31, 2009 for us. We have included the required disclosures in Note 4 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on subsequent events, but this guidance was amended by new authoritative guidance issued in February, 2010. The original guidance required the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date—that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The new guidance removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date in both issued and revised financial statements. This amendment removes potential conflicts with SEC requirements. The original guidance became effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, the quarter ending June 30, 2009 for us, and the amendment became effective upon issuance of the final update in February, 2010.
The FASB issued authoritative guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets in June 2009 with an update issued in December 2009. This guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009, the year ending December 31, 2010 for us. This new guidance limits the circumstances in which a financial asset may be de-recognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire financial asset or has continuing involvement with the transferred asset. The concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, which had previously facilitated sale accounting for certain asset transfers, is removed by this new guidance. The adoption of this new guidance did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
The FASB issued authoritative guidance on accounting for variable interest entities (VIE) in June 2009 with an update issued in December 2009. This guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009, the year ending December 2010 for us. This guidance changes the process for how an enterprise determines which party consolidates a VIE, to a primarily qualitative analysis. The party that consolidates the VIE (the primary beneficiary) is defined as the party with (1) the power to direct activities of the VIE that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE. Upon adoption, reporting enterprises must reconsider their conclusions on whether an entity should be consolidated and should a change result, the effect on net assets will be recorded
27
as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings. The adoption of this new guidance did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance entitled “Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash” to address and eliminate the diversity in practice related to the accounting for a distribution to shareholders that offers them the ability to elect to receive their entire distribution in cash or shares of equivalent value with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate. The amendments in this update clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per share prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). Those distributions should be accounted for and included in earnings per share calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25-14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments in this update are effective on a retrospective basis for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, the year ending December 31, 2009 for us. The adoption of this new guidance did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Fluctuating commodity prices affect market risk in our recycling segment. We mitigate this risk by selling our product on a monthly contract basis. Each month we negotiate selling prices for all commodities. Based on these monthly agreements, we determine purchase prices based on a margin needed to cover processing and administrative expenses.
We are exposed to commodity price risk, mainly associated with variations in the market price for ferrous and nonferrous metal, and other commodities. The timing and magnitude of industry cycles are difficult to predict and are impacted by general economic conditions. We respond to changes in recycled metal selling prices by adjusting purchase prices on a timely basis and by turning rather than holding inventory in expectation of higher prices. However, financial results may be negatively impacted where selling prices fall more quickly than purchase price adjustments can be made or when levels of inventory have an anticipated net realizable value that is below average cost.
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our floating rate borrowings. On April 13, 2010, we entered into a Loan Agreement with BB&T and BB&T Bankcard Corporation pursuant to which the Bank agreed to provide the Company a revolving credit facility in the amount of $20,000,000 for the purpose of replacing the Company’s existing $12,000,000 promissory note to the Bank and the Company’s existing $10,000,000 senior revolving credit facility with the Bank. In addition, Company, the Bank and certain other parties entered into a Modification and Cross-Collateralization Agreement pursuant to which the Company and the Bank modified the Company’s existing $5,000,000 term loan to the Bank. Proceeds of the new revolving credit facility in the amount of $17.7 million were used to repay the outstanding principal balance of the $12,000,000 promissory note and the amount outstanding under the prior credit facility and to pay closing costs. See Note 4 – Long Term Debt in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the new loan agreement and modification of the $5,000,000 term loan. Based on our average anticipated borrowings under our credit agreements in fiscal 2010, a hypothetical increase or decrease in the LIBOR rate by 1% would increase or decrease interest expense on our variable borrowings by 1% of the outstanding balance, with a corresponding change in cash flows.
We entered into three interest rate swap agreements swapping variable rates for fixed rates. The first swap agreement covers $5.5 million in debt and commenced April 7, 2009 and matures on April 7, 2014. The second
28
swap agreement covers approximately $2.5 million in debt and commenced October 15, 2008 and matures on May 7, 2013. The third swap agreement covers approximately $535,000 in debt and commenced October 22, 2008 and matures on October 22, 2013. The three swap agreements fix our interest rate at approximately 5.8%. At June 30, 2010, we recorded the estimated fair value of the liability related to the three swaps as approximately $724,000. Accounting rules require us to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at estimated fair value. We have designated these agreements as a cash flow hedge.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates in the normal course of business. Our interest income and expense are most sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates and the LIBOR rate. In order to manage this exposure, we use a combination of debt instruments, including the use of derivatives in the form of interest rate swap agreements. We do not enter into any derivatives for trading purposes. The use of the interest rate swap agreement is intended to convert the variable rate to a fixed rate.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
| |
(a) | Disclosure controls and procedures. |
ISA’s management, including ISA’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, ISA’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that ISA files under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specific in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to ISA’s management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
| |
(b) | Changes to internal control over financial reporting |
There were no changes in ISA’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect ISA’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.Legal Proceedings
On January 4, 2007, Lennox Industries, Inc., a commercial heating and air-conditioning manufacturer, filed a suit against us inLennox Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Services of America, Inc., Case No. CV-2007-004 in the Arkansas County, Arkansas Circuit court in Stuttgart, Arkansas. Lennox in its Second Amended Complaint currently alleges breach of contract, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty arising from our alleged miscategorization of Lennox’s scrap metal and mismanagement of the scrap metal recycling operations at three Lennox plants during the contract period April 18, 2001 through November 2005.
We filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in October, 2009, which the court denied in February, 2010. Discovery by the parties is still ongoing. There are currently no dates set for either a mediation or a jury trial. We are vigorously defending all of Lennox’s claims as we believe the claims to be without merit.
29
Item 1A.Risk Factors
We have had no material changes from the risk factors reported in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22, 2010.
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On November 15, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to 300,000 shares of our common stock at current market prices. No shares were repurchased in 2010 or 2009. In 2008, we repurchased 83,411 shares. In 2007, we repurchased 60,000 shares. In 2006, we repurchased 8,264 shares, and in 2005 we repurchased 15,000 shares.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
| | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
| | | | | | | | |
Mar-08 | | 29,630 | | $ 5.5215 | | 112,893 | | 187,107 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Jun-08 | | 14,781 | | $ 7.6113 | | 127,674 | | 172,326 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Sept-08 | | 39,000 | | $ 6.5268 | | 166,674 | | 133,326 |
Item 3.Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.Removed and Reserved
Item 5.Other Information
None.
Item 6.Exhibits
See exhibit index.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| | INDUSTRIAL SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC. |
| | |
Date: | August 9, 2010 | /s/ Harry Kletter |
| |
|
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| | (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) |
| | |
Date: | August 9, 2010 | /s/ Alan Schroering |
| |
|
| | Chief Financial Officer |
31
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibits |
| |
|
| | |
10.1 | | Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated July 1, 2010, by and between ISA and Steve Jones. |
| | |
10.2 | | Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated July 1, 2010, by and between ISA and Jeff Valentine. |
| | |
10.3 | | Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement of Venture Metals, LLC, dated July 1, 2010, by and between ISA and Venture Metals, LLC, of Florida. |
| | |
10.4 | | Credit Agreement, dated July 30, 2010, by and among Industrial Services of America, Inc., ISA Indiana, Inc. and Fifth Third Bank. |
| | |
10.5 | | Schedule 5.22 to Credit Agreement. |
| | |
10.6 | | Revolving Loan Note, dated July 30, 2010, in the amount of $40,000,000 payable to Fifth Third Bank. |
| | |
10.7 | | Term Loan Note, dated July 30, 2010, in the amount of $8,800,000 payable to Fifth Third Bank. |
| | |
10.8 | | Security Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2010, by and among Fifth Third Bank, Computerized Waste Systems, LLC, ISA Indiana Real Estate, LLC, ISA Logistics LLC, ISA Real Estate LLC, ISA Recycling, LLC, Waste Equipment Sales & Service Co., LLC, 7021 Grade Lane LLC, 7124 Grade Lane LLC, and 7200 Grade Lane LLC. |
| | |
10.9 | | Guaranty, dated as of July 30, 2010, by Computerized Waste Systems, LLC, ISA Indiana Real Estate, LLC, ISA Logistics LLC, ISA Real Estate LLC, ISA Recycling, LLC, Waste Equipment Sales & Service Co., LLC, 7021 Grade Lane LLC, 7124 Grade Lane LLC, and 7200 Grade Lane LLC. |
| | |
10.10 | | Pledge Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2010, between Industrial Services of America, Inc. and Fifth Third Bank. |
| | |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Harry Kletter for the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. |
| | |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Alan Schroering for the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. |
| | |
32.1 | | Section 1350 Certification of Harry Kletter and Alan Schroering for the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. |
32