UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|
|
FORM N-CSR |
|
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
Investment Company Act file number 811-524
The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust |
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter) |
|
|
c/o The Dreyfus Corporation |
200 Park Avenue |
New York, New York 10166 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
|
Michael A. Rosenberg, Esq. |
200 Park Avenue |
New York, New York 10166 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 922-6000
Date of fiscal year end: | | 12/31 |
Date of reporting period: | | 06/30/2008 |
The following N-CSR relates only to the Registrant’s series listed below and does not affect the other series of the Registrant, which have different fiscal year ends and, therefore, different N-CSR reporting requirements. Separate N-CSR Forms will be filed for those series, as appropriate.
Dreyfus Premier Core Value Fund Dreyfus Premier Limited Term High Yield Fund
|
FORM N-CSR
Item 1. | | Reports to Stockholders. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12e58/12e58de4d9ac168f1cf9d4ebc17704ddf2b46d30" alt=""
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents |
|
| | THE FUND |
| |
|
2 | | A Letter from the CEO |
3 | | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses |
| | With Those of Other Funds |
7 | | Statement of Investments |
12 | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
13 | | Statement of Operations |
14 | | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
17 | | Financial Highlights |
23 | | Notes to Financial Statements |
32 | | Information About the Review and |
| | Approval of the Fund’s Investment |
Management Agreement |
FOR MORE INFORMATION |
|
| | Back Cover |
The Fund
Dreyfus Premier |
Core Value Fund |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa95c/aa95c27f6862e1854e75e7e2efcb43b4b85dd3ff" alt=""
A LETTER FROM THE CEO
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus Premier Core Value Fund, covering the six-month period from January 1, 2008, through June 30, 2008.
The U.S. equity markets remained turbulent over the first half of 2008 and ended with June posting one of the worst monthly performance slumps on record. A continuously weakening U.S. housing market, surging inflation, devaluation of the U.S. dollar and lingering credit concerns continued to dampen investor sentiment. Of the ten economic sectors represented by the S&P 500® Composite Stock Index, only two — energy and materials — posted positive absolute returns for the reporting period. The financials sector was the hardest-hit industry group, primarily due to massive sub-prime related losses among global financial institutions.
While the U.S and global economy clearly has slowed, the news is not all bad. We have seen signs of more orderly deleveraging among financial institutions, and it appears that most of the damage caused by last-year’s sub-prime fiasco has been exposed and, to an extent, ameliorated. Moreover, the global upsurge in inflation should persist longer in fast-growing emerging markets than in more developed countries. These factors support our view that many areas of the stock market may have been punished too severely in the downturn, creating potential long-term opportunities for patient investors.As always, your financial advisor can help you identify suitable investments that may be right for you and your long-term investment goals.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as market perspectives, we have provided a Discussion of Fund Performance given by the fund’s Portfolio Manager.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2c1c/c2c1c1a65171aaa120295c9ae5eafebe9b9d08ba" alt=""
2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e53bd/e53bd6bf84755a5851745e7cad4828a9064ea309" alt=""
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2008, through June 30, 2008, as provided by Brian Ferguson, Portfolio Manager
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, Dreyfus Premier Core Value Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of –11.42%, Class B shares returned –11.79%, Class C shares returned –11.77%, Class I shares returned –11.28%, Class T shares returned –11.53% and Institutional shares returned –11.41% .1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index (the “Index”), produced a total return of –13.57% for the same period.2
Stocks generally declined as investors reacted negatively to deteriorating economic conditions, including plummeting housing values, mounting job losses and soaring food and energy prices.The fund produced higher returns than its benchmark, due mainly to the success of our security selection process, which enabled it to avoid the full brunt of pronounced weakness in the financials sector while participating fully in the energy sector’s gains.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund invests primarily in large-cap companies that are considered undervalued based on traditional measures, such as price-to-earnings ratios. When choosing stocks, we use a “bottom-up” stock selection approach, focusing on individual companies, rather than a “top-down” approach that forecasts market trends. We also focus on a company’s relative value, financial strength, business momentum and likely catalysts that could ignite the stock price.
Stocks Struggled in a Weaker Economy
U.S. stocks generally produced disappointing results over the first half of 2008 amid an onslaught of negative economic news. As housing values continued to plummet, mortgage defaults, delinquencies and foreclosures rose sharply.At the same time,escalating commodity prices have burdened consumers with soaring gasoline and home heating expenditures and
The Fund 3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
rising food costs.These factors caused consumers to cut back on spending in other, more discretionary areas. In turn, many businesses reduced capital spending in anticipation of a more difficult business environment.
Meanwhile, a credit crisis that began in 2007 in the sub-prime mortgage market continued to batter commercial banks,investment banks and bond insurers.A number of the world’s major financial institutions continued to announce new write-downs and write-offs over the reporting period, sparking steep declines in their stock prices.Most other market sectors also posted losses, but to a smaller degree, in this challenging environment. In fact, only the energy sector produced a positive absolute return for the Russell 1000 Value Index over the first six months of the year.
A Conservative Approach Helped Cushion Losses
We maintained a relatively conservative investment posture in an uncertain and volatile marketplace over the first half of 2008, attempting to avoid companies that we regarded as most vulnerable to the downturn.This approach led us to maintain an underweighted position in the financials sector overall, especially among banks with significant balance-sheet risk. Instead, we focused on financial companies with stronger balance sheets, such as Northern Trust, Aon Corporation and Goldman Sachs Group, and those with diversified operations, including PNC Financial Services Group. As a result, the fund’s financials stocks declined less that the Index’s financials component.
The fund also participated fully in some of the benchmark’s better-performing areas. In the energy sector, we maintained a roughly equal weight position but focused primarily on efficient producers of natural gas — such as Devon Energy, XTO Energy and Chesapeake Energy — that have benefited from the positive effects of tight supplies and robust demand on gas prices.The fund also benefited from our stock selection strategy in the utilities sector, where we emphasized unregulated power producers with pricing power, such as Exelon and Entergy, as well as natural gas distributor Questar.
Finally, the fund’s consumer staples holdings fared relatively well as retail giant Wal-Mart Stores gained value when its stock bounced back from weakness in 2007 and cash-strapped consumers increasingly
4
sought inexpensive goods in the faltering economy. In addition, beer maker MillerCoors benefited from expanded profit margins in the wake of the merger of SABMiller and Molson Coors.
On the other hand, the fund did not participate fully in the relative strength of steel producers in the materials sector, which benefited from rising commodity prices amid robust demand for construction materials in China, India and other emerging markets. In the consumer discretionary sector, media conglomerate News Corporation suffered due to slow advertising spending and concerns that the company might make another costly acquisition. Leisure provider Royal Caribbean Cruises’ stock price was hurt by higher fuel prices and concerns regarding consumer spending.
Finding Opportunities in a Distressed Market
As of midyear, the U.S. economy has remained weak, and market volatility has persisted. Consequently, we intend to maintain a relatively cautious investment posture, focusing on economic sectors and companies in which we have a high degree of conviction as to their prospects. We also have found opportunities among individual companies that we believe currently enjoy catalysts for higher valuations, such as new products or management changes. In the main, however, we intend to remain patient, disciplined and focused on value-oriented opportunities for long-term growth.
July 15, 2008
1 | | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
| | consideration the maximum initial sales charges in the case of Class A and Class T shares or the |
| | applicable contingent deferred sales charges imposed on redemptions in the case of Class B and |
| | Class C shares. Had these charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance |
| | is no guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon |
| | redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. |
2 | | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects the reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, |
| | capital gain distributions.The Russell 1000 Value Index is an unmanaged index, which measures |
| | the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower |
| | forecasted growth values. |
The Fund 5
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Premier Core Value Fund from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | | | | | |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended June 30, 2008 | | | | |
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class T | | Institutional |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000 † | | $ 5.39 | | $ 8.89 | | $ 8.89 | | $ 4.22 | | $ 6.56 | | $ 4.92 |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | | $885.80 | | $882.10 | | $882.30 | | $887.20 | | $884.70 | | $885.90 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended June 30, 2008 |
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class T | | Institutional |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000 † | | $ 5.77 | | $ 9.52 | | $ 9.52 | | $ 4.52 | | $ 7.02 | | $ 5.27 |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | | $1,019.14 | | $1,015.42 | | $1,015.42 | | $1,020.39 | | $1,017.90 | | $1,019.64 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.15% for Class A, 1.90% for Class B, 1.90% for |
Class C, .90% for Class I, 1.40% for Class T and 1.05% for Institutional multiplied by the average account value |
over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
June 30, 2008 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks—99.1% | | Shares | | | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
|
Consumer Discretionary—7.7% | | | | | | |
Coca-Cola | | 48,390 | | | | 2,515,312 |
Gap | | 158,620 | | | | 2,644,195 |
Johnson Controls | | 78,870a | | | | 2,261,991 |
Lowe’s Cos. | | 112,730 | | | | 2,339,147 |
McDonald’s | | 49,480 | | | | 2,781,766 |
News, Cl. A | | 419,490 | | | | 6,309,130 |
Omnicom Group | | 137,150 | | | | 6,155,292 |
Royal Caribbean Cruises | | 84,120a | | | | 1,890,176 |
Time Warner | | 253,050 | | | | 3,745,140 |
TJX Cos. | | 126,180 | | | | 3,970,885 |
Toll Brothers | | 77,990b | | | | 1,460,753 |
Viacom, Cl. B | | 107,340b | | | | 3,278,164 |
| | | | | | 39,351,951 |
Consumer Staples—10.7% | | | | | | |
Cadbury, ADR | | 80,908 | | | | 4,071,291 |
CVS Caremark | | 148,380 | | | | 5,871,397 |
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group | | 107,761b | | | | 2,260,826 |
Estee Lauder, Cl. A | | 64,230a | | | | 2,983,483 |
Kraft Foods, Cl. A | | 266,934 | | | | 7,594,272 |
Molson Coors Brewing, Cl. B | | 70,100 | | | | 3,808,533 |
Philip Morris International | | 212,280 | | | | 10,484,509 |
Procter & Gamble | | 156,170 | | | | 9,496,698 |
Wal-Mart Stores | | 91,950 | | | | 5,167,590 |
Walgreen | | 75,290 | | | | 2,447,678 |
| | | | | | 54,186,277 |
Energy—18.5% | | | | | | |
Anadarko Petroleum | | 35,860 | | | | 2,683,762 |
Chesapeake Energy | | 132,910a | | | | 8,766,744 |
Chevron | | 208,090 | | | | 20,627,962 |
Devon Energy | | 104,510 | | | | 12,557,922 |
EOG Resources | | 20,590 | | | | 2,701,408 |
Exxon Mobil | | 210,872 | | | | 18,584,149 |
Hess | | 21,710 | | | | 2,739,585 |
Marathon Oil | | 99,900 | | | | 5,181,813 |
The Fund 7
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | | Shares | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
|
Energy (continued) | | | | |
Occidental Petroleum | | 60,160 | | 5,405,978 |
Schlumberger | | 47,110 | | 5,061,027 |
XTO Energy | | 141,980 a | | 9,727,050 |
| | | | 94,037,400 |
Financial—22.5% | | | | |
American International Group | | 145,133 | | 3,840,219 |
Ameriprise Financial | | 52,110 | | 2,119,314 |
AON | | 60,940 | | 2,799,584 |
Bank of America | | 187,746 | | 4,481,497 |
Capital One Financial | | 31,860 | | 1,210,999 |
Chubb | | 90,310 | | 4,426,093 |
Citigroup | | 446,623 | | 7,485,401 |
Federal National Mortgage Association | | 200,290 | | 3,907,658 |
Franklin Resources | | 23,270 | | 2,132,696 |
Freddie Mac | | 71,350 | | 1,170,140 |
Genworth Financial, Cl. A | | 109,815 | | 1,955,805 |
Goldman Sachs Group | | 51,540 | | 9,014,346 |
Invesco | | 199,500 | | 4,784,010 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | 473,220 | | 16,236,178 |
Lincoln National | | 84,820 | | 3,844,042 |
MetLife | | 106,400 a | | 5,614,728 |
Moody’s | | 70,340 a | | 2,422,510 |
Morgan Stanley | | 76,750 | | 2,768,372 |
Northern Trust | | 56,140 | | 3,849,520 |
PNC Financial Services Group | | 92,880 | | 5,303,448 |
Principal Financial Group | | 62,280 | | 2,613,892 |
Prudential Financial | | 45,070 a | | 2,692,482 |
State Street | | 33,120 a | | 2,119,349 |
T. Rowe Price Group | | 56,310 | | 3,179,826 |
U.S. Bancorp | | 177,440 | | 4,948,801 |
Wachovia | | 165,520 | | 2,570,526 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | | 288,150 a | | 6,843,562 |
| | | | 114,334,998 |
8
Common Stocks (continued) | | Shares | | | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
|
Health Care—8.6% | | | | | | |
Abbott Laboratories | | 173,590 | | | | 9,195,062 |
Amgen | | 80,410b | | | | 3,792,136 |
Baxter International | | 45,220 | | | | 2,891,367 |
Covidien | | 70,770 | | | | 3,389,175 |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings | | 34,050b | | | | 2,370,901 |
Merck & Co. | | 119,370 | | | | 4,499,055 |
Schering-Plough | | 133,490 | | | | 2,628,418 |
Thermo Fisher Scientific | | 58,380b | | | | 3,253,517 |
Wyeth | | 241,200 | | | | 11,567,952 |
| | | | | | 43,587,583 |
Index—1.0% | | | | | | |
iShares Russell 1000 Value Index Fund | | 73,650 | | | | 5,085,532 |
Industrial—9.9% | | | | | | |
Dover | | 57,980 | | | | 2,804,493 |
Eaton | | 64,240 | | | | 5,458,473 |
General Electric | | 775,220 | | | | 20,690,622 |
Honeywell International | | 56,550 | | | | 2,843,334 |
Lockheed Martin | | 50,420 | | | | 4,974,437 |
Raytheon | | 56,960 | | | | 3,205,709 |
Tyco International | | 43,510 | | | | 1,742,140 |
Union Pacific | | 57,460 | | | | 4,338,230 |
Waste Management | | 114,500 | | | | 4,317,795 |
| | | | | | 50,375,233 |
Information Technology—4.7% | | | | | | |
Accenture, Cl. A | | 98,140 | | | | 3,996,261 |
Automatic Data Processing | | 62,420 | | | | 2,615,398 |
Hewlett-Packard | | 61,960 | | | | 2,739,252 |
Intel | | 188,980 | | | | 4,059,290 |
International Business Machines | | 22,450 | | | | 2,660,998 |
Microsoft | | 93,890 | | | | 2,582,914 |
NCR | | 73,960 | | | | 1,863,792 |
Tyco Electronics | | 87,600 | | | | 3,137,832 |
| | | | | | 23,655,737 |
The Fund 9
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | | Shares | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
|
Materials—2.7% | | | | |
Air Products & Chemicals | | 30,710 | | 3,035,991 |
Celanese, Ser. A | | 67,930 | | 3,101,684 |
Dow Chemical | | 73,870 | | 2,578,802 |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold | | 45,010 | | 5,274,722 |
| | | | 13,991,199 |
Telecommunications—4.4% | | | | |
AT & T | | 440,825 | | 14,851,394 |
Sprint Nextel | | 257,400 | | 2,445,300 |
Verizon Communications | | 144,380 | | 5,111,052 |
| | | | 22,407,746 |
Utilities—8.4% | | | | |
Constellation Energy Group | | 57,190 | | 4,695,299 |
Entergy | | 72,020 | | 8,676,970 |
Exelon | | 98,315 | | 8,844,417 |
FPL Group | | 41,060 | | 2,692,715 |
NRG Energy | | 66,480 a | | 2,851,992 |
Questar | | 137,910 | | 9,797,126 |
Southern | | 150,360 | | 5,250,571 |
| | | | 42,809,090 |
Total Common Stocks | | | | |
(cost $481,585,801) | | | | 503,822,746 |
| |
| |
|
|
Other Investment—2.1% | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Registered Investment Company; | | | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | | | | |
Plus Money Market Fund | | | | |
(cost $10,377,000) | | 10,377,000 c | | 10,377,000 |
10
Investment of Cash Collateral | | | | |
for Securities Loaned—2.4% | | Shares | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
|
Registered Investment Company; | | | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Cash | | | | |
Advantage Fund | | | | |
(cost $12,348,685) | | 12,348,685 c | | 12,348,685 |
| |
| |
|
Total Investments (cost $504,311,486) | | 103.6% | | 526,548,431 |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | | (3.6%) | | (18,205,749) |
Net Assets | | 100.0% | | 508,342,682 |
ADR—American Depository Receipts |
a All or a portion of these securities are on loan. At June 30, 2008, the total market value of the fund’s securities on |
loan is $11,831,543 and the total market value of the collateral held by the fund is $12,348,685. |
b Non-income producing security. |
c Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary | | (Unaudited) † | | | | |
|
| | Value (%) | | | | Value (%) |
| |
| |
| |
|
Financial | | 22.5 | | Information Technology | | 4.7 |
Energy | | 18.5 | | Money Market Investments | | 4.5 |
Consumer Staples | | 10.7 | | Telecommunications | | 4.4 |
Industrial | | 9.9 | | Materials | | 2.7 |
Health Care | | 8.6 | | Index | | 1.0 |
Utilities | | 8.4 | | | | |
Consumer Discretionary | | 7.7 | | | | 103.6 |
† Based on net assets. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 11
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
June 30, 2008 (Unaudited) |
| | Cost | | Value |
| |
| |
|
Assets ($): | | | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement of | | | | |
Investments (including securities on loan, | | | | |
valued at $11,831,543)—Note 1(b): | | | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | 481,585,801 | | 503,822,746 |
Affiliated issuers | | 22,725,685 | | 22,725,685 |
Receivable for investment securities sold | | | | 3,986,156 |
Dividends and interest receivable | | | | 868,805 |
Receivable for shares of Capital Stock subscribed | | 38,676 |
Other assets | | | | 13,281 |
| | | | 531,455,349 |
| |
| |
|
Liabilities ($): | | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(b) | | 514,989 |
Cash overdraft due to Custodian | | | | 212,314 |
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(b) | | | | 12,348,685 |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | | | 9,525,883 |
Payable for shares of Capital Stock redeemed | | 507,025 |
Interest payable—Note 2 | | | | 3,771 |
| | | | 23,112,667 |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($) | | | | 508,342,682 |
| |
| |
|
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | | 483,710,970 |
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | | 325,414 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | 2,069,353 |
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | | | | |
(depreciation) on investments | | | | 22,236,945 |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($) | | | | 508,342,682 |
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class T | | Institutional |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($) | | 444,768,415 | | 13,055,763 | | 12,717,190 | | 1,191,348 | | 1,988,374 | | 34,621,592 |
Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding | | 16,926,362 | | 507,156 | | 494,468 | | 45,344 | | 75,703 | | 1,318,410 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Asset Value | | | | | | | | | | |
Per Share ($) | | 26.28 | | 25.74 | | 25.72 | | 26.27 | | 26.27 | | 26.26 |
See notes to financial statements.
12
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | | |
Income: | | |
Cash dividends: | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | 6,561,313 |
Affiliated issuers | | 54,546 |
Income from securities lending | | 88,121 |
Total Income | | 6,703,980 |
Expenses: | | |
Management fee—Note 3(a) | | 2,460,831 |
Distribution and service fees—Note 3(b) | | 786,771 |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(a) | | 19,338 |
Interest expense—Note 2 | | 2,833 |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | | 831 |
Total Expenses | | 3,270,604 |
Less—Directors’ fees reimbursed | | |
by the Manager—Note 3(a) | | (19,338) |
Net Expenses | | 3,251,266 |
Investment Income—Net | | 3,452,714 |
| |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | 4,082,742 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | | (75,638,162) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | | (71,555,420) |
Net (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | | (68,102,706) |
See notes to financial statements.
The Fund 13
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | Six Months Ended | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | Year Ended |
| | (Unaudited) | | December 31, 2007 a |
| |
| |
|
Operations ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net | | 3,452,714 | | 8,848,052 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | 4,082,742 | | 39,344,889 |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | | |
(depreciation) on investments | | (75,638,162) | | (29,018,064) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
Resulting from Operations | | (68,102,706) | | 19,174,877 |
| |
| |
|
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net: | | | | |
Class A Shares | | (3,087,990) | | (7,810,838) |
Class B Shares | | (46,048) | | (254,740) |
Class C Shares | | (40,944) | | (123,543) |
Class I Shares | | (9,736) | | (108,839) |
Class T Shares | | (11,528) | | (32,567) |
Institutional Shares | | (257,136) | | (663,937) |
Net realized gain on investments: | | | | |
Class A Shares | | (10,261) | | (42,093,570) |
Class B Shares | | (393) | | (2,466,684) |
Class C Shares | | (323) | | (1,391,903) |
Class I Shares | | (27) | | (508,414) |
Class T Shares | | (48) | | (201,432) |
Institutional Shares | | (791) | | (3,287,550) |
Total Dividends | | (3,465,225) | | (58,944,017) |
| |
| |
|
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | | | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | | | |
Class A Shares | | 14,196,966 | | 40,085,946 |
Class B Shares | | 135,297 | | 550,036 |
Class C Shares | | 469,561 | | 1,179,760 |
Class I Shares | | 17,557 | | 1,096,343 |
Class T Shares | | 37,609 | | 296,144 |
Institutional Shares | | 777,359 | | 847,676 |
14
| | Six Months Ended | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | Year Ended |
| | (Unaudited) | | December 31, 2007 a |
| |
| |
|
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($) (continued): | | |
Dividends reinvested: | | | | |
Class A Shares | | 2,662,410 | | 43,432,695 |
Class B Shares | | 43,453 | | 2,534,368 |
Class C Shares | | 35,427 | | 1,288,594 |
Class I Shares | | 9,712 | | 615,892 |
Class T Shares | | 11,291 | | 227,701 |
Institutional Shares | | 251,578 | | 3,856,636 |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | | | |
Class A Shares | | (32,955,318) | | (74,701,854) |
Class B Shares | | (11,360,524) | | (30,469,016) |
Class C Shares | | (2,506,103) | | (5,813,398) |
Class I Shares | | (65,423) | | (5,900,616) |
Class T Shares | | (173,461) | | (1,445,146) |
Institutional Shares | | (2,266,890) | | (5,906,978) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | | | | |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | | (30,679,499) | | (28,225,217) |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | (102,247,430) | | (67,994,357) |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Beginning of Period | | 610,590,112 | | 678,584,469 |
End of Period | | 508,342,682 | | 610,590,112 |
Undistributed investment income—net | | 325,414 | | 326,082 |
The Fund 15
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
| | Six Months Ended | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | Year Ended |
| | (Unaudited) | | December 31, 2007 a |
| |
| |
|
Capital Share Transactions: | | | | |
Class A b | | | | |
Shares sold | | 500,203 | | 1,223,509 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | 99,678 | | 1,432,160 |
Shares redeemed | | (1,179,283) | | (2,291,194) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | | (579,402) | | 364,475 |
| |
| |
|
Class B b | | | | |
Shares sold | | 4,909 | | 17,264 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | 1,650 | | 85,084 |
Shares redeemed | | (409,990) | | (946,775) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | | (403,431) | | (844,427) |
| |
| |
|
Class C | | | | |
Shares sold | | 17,315 | | 37,358 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | 1,348 | | 43,561 |
Shares redeemed | | (91,055) | | (180,767) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | | (72,392) | | (99,848) |
| |
| |
|
Class I | | | | |
Shares sold | | 614 | | 33,594 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | 361 | | 20,309 |
Shares redeemed | | (2,361) | | (195,159) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | | (1,386) | | (141,256) |
| |
| |
|
Class T | | | | |
Shares sold | | 1,345 | | 9,093 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | 421 | | 7,498 |
Shares redeemed | | (6,181) | | (43,815) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | | (4,415) | | (27,224) |
| |
| |
|
Institutional Shares | | | | |
Shares sold | | 27,201 | | 26,624 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | 9,380 | | 127,036 |
Shares redeemed | | (80,824) | | (182,481) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | | (44,243) | | (28,821) |
a Effective June 1, 2007, Class R shares were redesignated as Class I shares. |
b During the period ended June 30, 2008, 252,655 Class B shares representing $7,040,508 were automatically |
converted to 247,355 Class A shares and during the period ended December 31, 2007, 576,529 Class B shares |
representing $18,595,312 were automatically converted to 565,175 Class A shares. |
See notes to financial statements.
16
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following tables describe the performance for each share class for the fiscal periods indicated.All information (except portfolio turnover rate) reflects financial results for a single fund share.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Class A Shares | | (Unaudited) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 29.87 | | 32.00 | | 31.38 | | 30.34 | | 27.44 | | 21.57 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net a | | .18 | | .45 | | .38 | | .30 | | .24 | | .17 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | | (3.59) | | .42 | | 5.94 | | 1.26 | | 2.88 | | 5.86 |
Total from Investment Operations | | (3.41) | | .87 | | 6.32 | | 1.56 | | 3.12 | | 6.03 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | | | | | | | |
investment income—net | | (.18) | | (.46) | | (.37) | | (.35) | | (.22) | | (.16) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain on investments | | (.00)b | | (2.54) | | (5.33) | | (.17) | | — | | — |
Total Distributions | | (.18) | | (3.00) | | (5.70) | | (.52) | | (.22) | | (.16) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 26.28 | | 29.87 | | 32.00 | | 31.38 | | 30.34 | | 27.44 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) c | | (11.42)d | | 2.75 | | 21.00 | | 5.18 | | 11.41 | | 28.09 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.15e | | 1.16 | | 1.15 | | 1.15 | | 1.15 | | 1.15 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.15e | | 1.15 | | 1.15 | | 1.15 | | 1.15 | | 1.15 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.29e | | 1.38 | | 1.17 | | .99 | | .86 | | .71 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | 21.65d | | 45.19 | | 44.73 | | 55.95 | | 74.98 | | 54.58 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 444,768 | | 522,906 | | 548,601 | | 556,017 | | 634,007 | | 607,633 |
a | | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
c | | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | | Not annualized. |
e | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 17
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Class B Shares | | (Unaudited) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 29.26 | | 31.40 | | 30.87 | | 29.83 | | 27.02 | | 21.27 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income (loss)—net a | | .07 | | .22 | | .13 | | .07 | | .02 | | (.01) |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | | (3.51) | | .39 | | 5.85 | | 1.26 | | 2.85 | | 5.77 |
Total from Investment Operations | | (3.44) | | .61 | | 5.98 | | 1.33 | | 2.87 | | 5.76 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | | | | | | | |
investment income—net | | (.08) | | (.21) | | (.12) | | (.12) | | (.06) | | (.01) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain on investments | | (.00)b | | (2.54) | | (5.33) | | (.17) | | — | | — |
Total Distributions | | (.08) | | (2.75) | | (5.45) | | (.29) | | (.06) | | (.01) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 25.74 | | 29.26 | | 31.40 | | 30.87 | | 29.83 | | 27.02 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) c | | (11.79)d | | 2.01 | | 20.12 | | 4.47 | | 10.62 | | 27.12 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.90e | | 1.91 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.90e | | 1.90 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(loss) to average net assets | | 0.53e | | .70 | | .42 | | .24 | | .10 | | (.04) |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | 21.65d | | 45.19 | | 44.73 | | 55.95 | | 74.98 | | 54.58 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 13,056 | | 26,646 | | 55,112 | | 64,239 | | 78,154 | | 78,780 |
a | | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
c | | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | | Not annualized. |
e | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Class C Shares | | (Unaudited) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 29.24 | | 31.38 | | 30.85 | | 29.83 | | 27.02 | | 21.27 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income (loss)—net a | | .07 | | .21 | | .14 | | .07 | | .02 | | (.01) |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | | (3.51) | | .40 | | 5.84 | | 1.24 | | 2.85 | | 5.77 |
Total from Investment Operations | | (3.44) | | .61 | | 5.98 | | 1.31 | | 2.87 | | 5.76 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | | | | | | | |
investment income—net | | (.08) | | (.21) | | (.12) | | (.12) | | (.06) | | (.01) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain on investments | | (.00)b | | (2.54) | | (5.33) | | (.17) | | — | | — |
Total Distributions | | (.08) | | (2.75) | | (5.45) | | (.29) | | (.06) | | (.01) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 25.72 | | 29.24 | | 31.38 | | 30.85 | | 29.83 | | 27.02 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) c | | (11.77)d | | 2.00 | | 20.07 | | 4.43 | | 10.62 | | 27.12 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.90e | | 1.91 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.90e | | 1.90 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 | | 1.90 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(loss) to average net assets | | 0.54e | | .65 | | .42 | | .24 | | .10 | | (.04) |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | 21.65d | | 45.19 | | 44.73 | | 55.95 | | 74.98 | | 54.58 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 12,717 | | 16,572 | | 20,919 | | 20,564 | | 21,958 | | 22,480 |
a | | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
c | | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | | Not annualized. |
e | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 19
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Class I Shares | | (Unaudited) | | 2007 a | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 29.85 | | 31.98 | | 31.36 | | 30.33 | | 27.43 | | 21.56 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net b | | .21 | | .57 | | .46 | | .38 | | .31 | | .22 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | | (3.57) | | .39 | | 5.95 | | 1.25 | | 2.88 | | 5.87 |
Total from Investment Operations | | (3.36) | | .96 | | 6.41 | | 1.63 | | 3.19 | | 6.09 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | | | | | | | |
investment income—net | | (.22) | | (.55) | | (.46) | | (.43) | | (.29) | | (.22) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain on investments | | (.00)c | | (2.54) | | (5.33) | | (.17) | | — | | — |
Total Distributions | | (.22) | | (3.09) | | (5.79) | | (.60) | | (.29) | | (.22) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 26.27 | | 29.85 | | 31.98 | | 31.36 | | 30.33 | | 27.43 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) | | (11.28)d | | 3.04 | | 21.26 | | 5.45 | | 11.69 | | 28.43 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | .90e | | .91 | | .90 | | .90 | | .90 | | .90 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | .90e | | .90 | | .90 | | .90 | | .90 | | .90 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.49e | | 1.63 | | 1.42 | | 1.25 | | 1.09 | | .95 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | 21.65d | | 45.19 | | 44.73 | | 55.95 | | 74.98 | | 54.58 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 1,191 | | 1,395 | | 6,012 | | 4,740 | | 50,536 | | 52,723 |
a | | Effective June 1, 2007, Class R shares were redesignated as Class I shares. |
b | | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
d | | Not annualized. |
e | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
20
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Class T Shares | | (Unaudited) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 29.86 | | 31.99 | | 31.37 | | 30.33 | | 27.43 | | 21.57 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net a | | .15 | | .38 | | .30 | | .23 | | .18 | | .11 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | | (3.59) | | .41 | | 5.94 | | 1.26 | | 2.87 | | 5.85 |
Total from Investment Operations | | (3.44) | | .79 | | 6.24 | | 1.49 | | 3.05 | | 5.96 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | | | | | | | |
investment income—net | | (.15) | | (.38) | | (.29) | | (.28) | | (.15) | | (.10) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain on investments | | (.00)b | | (2.54) | | (5.33) | | (.17) | | — | | — |
Total Distributions | | (.15) | | (2.92) | | (5.62) | | (.45) | | (.15) | | (.10) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 26.27 | | 29.86 | | 31.99 | | 31.37 | | 30.33 | | 27.43 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) c | | (11.53)d | | 2.49 | | 20.67 | | 4.95 | | 11.14 | | 27.72 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.40e | | 1.41 | | 1.40 | | 1.40 | | 1.40 | | 1.40 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.40e | | 1.40 | | 1.40 | | 1.40 | | 1.40 | | 1.40 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.04e | | 1.17 | | .93 | | .74 | | .65 | | .45 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | 21.65d | | 45.19 | | 44.73 | | 55.95 | | 74.98 | | 54.58 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 1,988 | | 2,392 | | 3,434 | | 2,840 | | 2,945 | | 2,264 |
a | | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
c | | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | | Not annualized. |
e | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 21
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Institutional Shares | | (Unaudited) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 29.85 | | 31.98 | | 31.36 | | 30.32 | | 27.42 | | 21.55 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net a | | .19 | | .48 | | .42 | | .33 | | .27 | | .19 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | | (3.58) | | .43 | | 5.94 | | 1.26 | | 2.88 | | 5.87 |
Total from Investment Operations | | (3.39) | | .91 | | 6.36 | | 1.59 | | 3.15 | | 6.06 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | | | | | | | |
investment income—net | | (.20) | | (.50) | | (.41) | | (.38) | | (.25) | | (.19) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain on investments | | (.00)b | | (2.54) | | (5.33) | | (.17) | | — | | — |
Total Distributions | | (.20) | | (3.04) | | (5.74) | | (.55) | | (.25) | | (.19) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 26.26 | | 29.85 | | 31.98 | | 31.36 | | 30.32 | | 27.42 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) | | (11.41)c | | 2.89 | | 21.11 | | 5.33 | | 11.53 | | 28.25 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.05d | | 1.06 | | 1.05 | | 1.05 | | 1.05 | | 1.05 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.05d | | 1.05 | | 1.05 | | 1.05 | | 1.05 | | 1.05 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.39d | | 1.49 | | 1.28 | | 1.09 | | .96 | | .81 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | 21.65c | | 45.19 | | 44.73 | | 55.95 | | 74.98 | | 54.58 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 34,622 | | 40,679 | | 44,506 | | 40,341 | | 41,202 | | 41,848 |
a | | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
c | | Not annualized. |
d | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
22
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Premier Core Value Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust (the “Trust”) which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company offering seven series, including the fund, as of the date of this report.The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares. The fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of Beneficial Interest in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class B, Class C, Class I, Class T and Institutional shares. Class A, Class B, Class C and Class T shares are sold primarily to retail investors through financial intermediaries and bear a distribution fee and/or service fee. Class A and Class T shares are subject to a front-end sales charge, while Class B and Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”). Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares after six years.The fund does not offer Class B shares, except in connection with dividend reinvestment and permitted exchanges of Class B shares. Class I shares are sold primarily to bank trust departments and other financial service providers (including Mellon Bank, N.A. (“Mellon Bank”), a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus) acting on behalf of customers having a qualified trust or investment account or relationship at such institution, and bear no distribution or service fees. Class I and Institutional shares are offered without a front-end sales charge or CDSC. Institutional shares are offered only to those customers of certain financial planners and investment advisers who held shares of a predecessor class of the fund as of April 4, 1994, and bear a distribution fee. Each class of shares has identical rights and privileges, except with respect to the distribution and service fees and voting rights on matters affecting a single class.
The Fund 23
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System, for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sale price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered open-end investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market),but before the fund calculates its net asset value,the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant ADRs and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Trustees, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. Investments denominated in foreign currencies are
24
translated to U.S. dollars at the prevailing rates of exchange. Forward currency exchange contracts are valued at the forward rate.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes an authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair-value measurements.The application of FAS 157 is required for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to FAS 157.
These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2008 in valuing the fund’s investments carried at fair value:
| | Investments in | | Other Financial |
Valuation Inputs | | Securities ($) | | Instruments ($) † |
| |
| |
|
Level 1—Quoted Prices | | 526,548,431 | | 0 |
Level 2—Other Significant | | | | |
Observable Inputs | | 0 | | 0 |
Level 3—Significant | | | | |
Unobservable Inputs | | 0 | | 0 |
Total | | 526,548,431 | | 0 |
† | | Other financial instruments include derivative instruments such as futures, forward currency |
| | exchange contracts and swap contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation |
| | (depreciation) on the instrument. |
The Fund 25
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with Mellon Bank, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy, that at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or Letters of Credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction.Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended June 30, 2008, Mellon Bank earned $37,766 from lending fund portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by the Manager are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
(d) Foreign currency transactions: The fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in the market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gains or losses from investments.
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales and maturities of short-term securities, sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized on securities transactions and the difference between the amount of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding
26
taxes recorded on the fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities other than investments in securities, resulting from changes in exchange rates. Such gains and losses are included with net realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments.
(e) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net are declared and paid on a quarterly basis. Dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, if any, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
(f) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
During the current year, the fund adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the fund’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority.Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year.The adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on the operations of the fund for the period ended June 30, 2008.
The Fund 27
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
As of and during the period ended June 30, 2008, the portfolio did not have any liabilities for any unrecognized tax benefits.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 was as follows: ordinary income $14,227,185 and long term capital gains $44,716,832.The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2—Bank Line of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $350 million redemption credit facility (“the Facility”) to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay commitment fees on its pro rata portion of the Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowing.
The average daily amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facility during the period ended June 30, 2008,was approximately $158,800 with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 3.59% .
NOTE 3—Investment Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to an Investment Management agreement with the Manager, the Manager provides or arranges for one or more third parties and/or affiliates to provide investment advisory, administrative, custody, fund accounting and transfer agency services to the fund.The Manager also directs the investments of the fund in accordance with its investment objective,policies and limitations.For these services,the fund is contractually obligated to pay the Manager a fee, calculated daily and
28
paid monthly, at the annual rate of .90% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets. Out of its fee, the Manager pays all of the expenses of the fund except brokerage fees, taxes, interest, commitment fees, Rule 12b-1 distribution fees and expenses, service fees and expenses of non-interested Trustees (including counsel fees) and extraordinary expenses. In addition, the Manager is required to reduce its fee in an amount equal to the fund’s allocable portion of fees and expenses of the non-interested Trustees (including counsel fees).Each Trustee receives $45,000 per year, plus $6,000 for each joint Board meeting of The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc.,The Dreyfus/Laurel Tax-Free Municipal Funds and the Trust (collectively, the “Dreyfus/Laurel Funds”) attended, $2,000 for separate in-person committee meetings attended which are not held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board meeting and $1,500 for Board meetings and separate committee meetings attended that are conducted by telephone and is reimbursed for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. With respect to Board meetings, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional 25% of such compensation (with the exception of reimbursable amounts).With respect to compensation committee meetings, the Chair of the compensation committee receives $900 per meeting and, with respect to audit committee meetings prior to April 12, 2008, the Chair of the audit committee received $1,350 per meeting. In the event that there is an in-person joint committee meeting or a joint telephone meeting of the Dreyfus/Laurel Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund, the $2,000 or $1,500 fee, as applicable, will be allocated between the Dreyfus/Laurel Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund.These fees and expenses are charged and allocated to each series based on net assets. Amounts required to be paid by the Trust directly to the non-interested Trustees, that would be applied to offset a portion of the management fee payable to the Manager, are in fact paid directly by the Manager to the non-interested Trustees.
During the period ended June 30, 2008, the Distributor retained $3,936 and $61 from commissions earned on sales of the fund’s Class A and Class T shares, respectively, and $26,878 and $1,201 from CDSCs on redemptions on the fund’s Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
The Fund 29
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
(b) Under separate Distribution Plans (the “Plans”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class A shares and Institutional shares may pay annually up to .25% and ..15%, respectively, of the value of their average daily net assets to compensate the Distributor for shareholder servicing activities and expenses primarily intended to result in the sale of Class A shares and Institutional shares. Class B, Class C and Class T shares pay the Distributor for distributing their shares at an aggregate annual rate of .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares, and .25% of the value of average daily net assets of Class T shares. The Distributor may pay one or more agents in respect of advertising, marketing and other distribution services for Class T shares and determines the amounts, if any, to be paid to agents and the basis on which such payments are made. Class B, Class C and Class T shares are also subject to a service plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (the “Service Plan”), under which Class B, Class C and Class T shares pay the Distributor for providing certain services to the holders of their shares a fee at the annual rate of .25% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class B, Class C and Class T shares, respectively. During the period ended June 30, 2008, Class A, Class B, Class C, Class T and Institutional shares were charged $593,292, $66,327, $54,076, $2,719 and $27,503 respectively, pursuant to their respective Plans. During the period ended June 30, 2008, Class B, Class C and Class T shares were charged $22,109, $18,026 and $2,719, respectively, pursuant to the Service Plan.
Under its terms, the Plans and Service Plan shall remain in effect from year to year, provided such continuance is approved annually by a vote of majority of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of or in any agreement related to the Plans or Service Plan.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $392,184, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $116,822 and shareholder services plan fees $5,983.
30
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended June 30, 2008, amounted to $119,417,207 and $157,208,301, respectively.
At June 30, 2008, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $22,236,945, consisting of $76,691,287 gross unrealized appreciation and $54,454,342 gross unrealized depreciation.
At June 30, 2008, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
In March 2008, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 161”). FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements.The application of FAS 161 is required for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FAS 161 and its impact on the financial statements and the accompanying notes has not yet been determined.
NOTE 5—Subsequent Event:
Effective July 1, 2008, BNY Mellon has reorganized and consolidated a number of its banking and trust company subsidiaries. As a result of the reorganization, any services previously provided to the fund by Mellon Bank, N.A. or Mellon Trust of New England, N.A. are now provided by The Bank of New York, which has changed its name to The Bank of New York Mellon.
The Fund 31
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND |
APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT |
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) |
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on February 12 and 13, 2008, the Board considered the re-approval of the fund’s Investment Management Agreement (“Management Agreement”), pursuant to which the Manager provides the fund with investment advisory and administrative services.The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of the Manager.
Analysis of Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund. The Board members considered information previously provided to them in a presentation from representatives of the Manager regarding services provided to the fund and other funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and representatives of the Manager confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. The Board also discussed the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the fund pursuant to its Management Agreement.The Manager’s representatives reviewed the fund’s distribution of accounts and the relationships the Manager has with various intermediaries and the different needs of each. The Manager’s representatives noted the distribution channels for the fund as well as the diversity of distribution among the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and the Manager’s corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including those of the fund. The Manager provided the number of shareholder accounts in the fund, as well as the fund’s asset size.
The Board members also considered the Manager’s research and portfolio management capabilities and that the Manager also provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered the Manager’s extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructure.
32
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio. The Board members reviewed the fund’s performance and comparisons to a group of retail front-end load, large-cap value funds (the “Performance Group”) and to a larger universe of funds, consisting of all retail and institutional large-cap value funds (the “Performance Universe”) selected and provided by Lipper, Inc., an independent provider of investment company data.The Board was provided with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe, as well as the Expense Group and Expense Universe (discussed below).The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance for the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 10-year periods ended December 31, 2007 was above the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians, except the fund’s performance was slightly below and equal to the Performance Group median for the 5- and 10-year periods ended December 31, 2007, respectively.The Manager also provided a comparison of the fund’s total returns to the returns of the fund’s benchmark index for each calendar year for the past ten years.
The Board members also discussed the fund’s management fee and expense ratio and reviewed the range of management fees and expense ratios of a comparable group of funds (the “Expense Group”) and a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), each selected and provided by Lipper.The Board members noted that the fund was the only fund in the Expense Group with a “unitary fee” structure. The Board members also noted that the fund’s management fee was above the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and the expense ratio was below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
Representatives of the Manager reviewed with the Board members the fees paid to the Manager or its affiliates by the only mutual fund managed by the Manager or its affiliates with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies, and included in the same Lipper category
The Fund 33
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
as the fund (the “Similar Fund”), and by other accounts managed by the Manager or its affiliates with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies as the fund (the “Similar Accounts”). The Manager’s representatives explained the nature of the Similar Accounts and the differences, from the Manager’s perspective, in providing services to such Similar Accounts as compared to managing and providing services to the fund. The Manager’s representatives also reviewed the costs associated with distribution through intermediaries.The Board analyzed differences in fees paid to the Manager and discussed the relationship of the fees paid in light of the services provided, noting the fund’s “unitary fee” structure.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Fund and the Similar Accounts to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.The Board acknowledged that differences in fees paid by the Similar Fund and the Similar Accounts seemed to be consistent with the services provided.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. The Manager’s representatives reviewed the dollar amount of expenses allocated and profit received by the Manager and the method used to determine such expenses and profit. The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding the Manager’s approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus mutual fund complex. The Board also was informed that the methodology had also been reviewed by an independent registered public accounting firm which, like the consultant, found the methodology to be reason-able.The consulting firm also analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of the fund. The Board members evaluated the profitability analysis in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect
34
these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders.The Board members also considered potential benefits to the Manager from acting as investment adviser and noted the Manager’s soft dollar arrangements with respect to trading the fund’s portfolio.
It was noted that the Board members should consider the Manager’s profitability with respect to the fund as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Management Agreement bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by the Manager, including the nature, extent and quality of such services and that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been decreasing, the possibility that the Manager may have realized any economies of scale would be less. It also was noted that the profitability percentage for managing the fund was within the range determined by appropriate court cases to be reasonable given the services rendered and generally superior service levels provided by the Manager.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to continuation of the fund’s Management Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board made the following conclusions and determinations:
- The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the ser- vices provided by the Manager are adequate and appropriate.
- The Board was satisfied with the fund’s performance.
- The Board concluded that the fee paid by the fund to the Manager was reasonable in light of the services provided, comparative perfor- mance, expense and advisory fee information, costs of the services provided and profits to be realized and benefits derived or to be derived by the Manager from its relationship with the fund.
The Fund 35
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
- The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by the Manager in con- nection with the management fee rate charged to the fund and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year, and, without any one factor being dispositive, the Board determined that re-approval of the fund’s Management Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders and that the Management Agreement would be renewed through April 4, 2009.
36
For More Information
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59a34/59a34b4ef9bdc66925cf4304eb90ed4c752a4a0f" alt=""
Telephone Call your financial representative or 1-800-554-4611
Mail | | The Dreyfus Premier Family of Funds |
| | 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 |
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
A description of the policies and procedures that the fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities, and information regarding how the fund voted these proxies for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2008, is available at http://www.dreyfus.com and on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The description of the policies and procedures is also available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-645-6561.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/743ca/743cafe974bc5b4ad3b74ceb174297b8a58975df" alt=""
© 2008 MBSC Securities Corporation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/662d2/662d25f977ee08ae6eaf485defcef459ae8f675f" alt=""
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents |
|
| | THE FUND |
| |
|
2 | | A Letter from the CEO |
3 | | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses |
| | With Those of Other Funds |
7 | | Statement of Investments |
20 | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
21 | | Statement of Operations |
22 | | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
24 | | Financial Highlights |
28 | | Notes to Financial Statements |
41 | | Information About the Review |
and Approval of the Fund’s |
| | Investment Management Agreement |
FOR MORE INFORMATION |
|
| | Back Cover |
The Fund
Dreyfus Premier |
Limited Term High Yield Fund |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93425/93425a64d2506775fe36c05cfd5e15ebb4709b81" alt=""
A LETTER FROM THE CEO
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus Premier Limited Term High Yield Fund, covering the six-month period from January 1, 2008, through June 30, 2008.
Fixed-income markets remained turbulent over the first half of 2008. Slumping housing markets, inflation concerns, rising unemployment and lingering credit concerns continued to dampen fixed-income investor sentiment. Throughout the first half of the year, investors continuously exhibited a “flight to quality” pattern, and U.S. government securities fared relatively well, while higher-yielding market sectors — including corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities — generally were hard-hit by credit concerns.
While the global economy clearly has slowed, the news is not all bad.We have seen signs of more orderly deleveraging among financial institutions, and it appears that most of the damage caused by last year’s sub-prime fiasco has been, to a great extent, exposed and ameliorated.The implications of our economic outlook for the U.S. bond market generally are positive, especially since selling pressure among overleveraged investors and the Fed’s recent comments on inflation have created attractive values in various fixed-income asset classes.These factors support our view that some areas of the U.S. bond market may have been punished too severely in the downturn, creating potential long-term opportunities for patient investors.As always, your financial advisor can help you identify suitable investments and an asset allocation that may be right for you and your long-term investment goals.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as market perspectives, we have provided a Discussion of Fund Performance given by the fund’s Portfolio Managers.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/898ed/898ed19c7c9ee227ae3a2b49a53a25de71cfcc7d" alt=""
2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f56c1/f56c13e502899776e75c5bc1ca8dfea7655dd783" alt=""
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2008, through June 30, 2008, as provided by Karen Bater and David Bowser, Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, Class A, B, C and I shares of Dreyfus Premier Limited Term High Yield Fund achieved total returns of –0.95%, –1.34%, –1.47% and –0.84%, respectively.1 In comparison, the Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Constrained Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of –1.06% over the same period.2
High yield bonds produced modestly negative absolute returns amid a persistent fixed-income credit crisis and an economic downturn. The fund’s Class A and Class I shares produced slightly higher returns than the fund’s benchmark index, primarily due to a conservative investment posture, including an emphasis on financially sound issuers that tend to be relatively insensitive to changing economic conditions.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks to maximize total return, consisting of capital appreciation and current income.The average effective maturity of the fund is limited to a maximum of 5.5 years.
At least 80% of the fund’s assets are invested in fixed-income securities that are rated below investment grade (“high yield” or “junk” bonds) or are the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus. Individual issues are selected based on careful credit analysis.We thoroughly analyze the business, management and financial strength of each of the companies whose bonds we buy, then project each issuer’s ability to repay its debt.
An Economic Downturn and Credit Crisis Intensified
Slumping housing markets, a weaker job market and soaring food and energy prices sparked a downturn in the U.S. economy during the first half of 2008, leading to lower prices for securities that tend to be
The Fund 3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
sensitive to economic conditions. In addition, a credit crisis that began in 2007 in the sub-prime mortgage market continued to dampen investor sentiment.
The impact of the credit crunch was particularly severe in higher yielding market sectors during the first quarter of the year, producing steep declines among mortgage- and asset-backed securities. Investment-grade and high yield corporate bonds also lost value as investors engaged in a “flight to quality” toward U.S. government securities. Although high yield bonds were adversely affected by these developments, their impact was even more severe among equities, whose sharp declines were led by financial institutions that suffered massive sub-prime related losses.
The Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) responded aggressively to these developments by injecting liquidity into the U.S. banking system and reducing short-term interest rates from 4.25% at the start of the reporting period to 2.00% at the end. In mid-March, the Fed reassured investors by participating in a plan to prevent the insolvency of a major investment bank from damaging other financial institutions. Market liquidity subsequently improved, and spread sectors rallied. However, in June, declines stemming from heightened inflation concerns and a new wave of write-downs by global banks had offset a substantial portion of the rebound by the reporting period’s end.
A Conservative Posture Supported Returns
In this challenging environment, we established a more defensive investment posture, emphasizing market sectors that we believed would hold up relatively well during a downturn.We raised the fund’s overall credit profile to a level that,in our judgment,was higher than that of the Index, as reflected by an emphasis on BB-rated bonds, a larger-than-normal cash position, a slightly higher average bond price and a modestly lower average coupon.We also set the fund’s average duration in a range we considered shorter than industry averages to protect the fund from the brunt of heightened market volatility.
These strategies positioned the fund for strong contributions to performance from companies with positive cash flows, talented management
4
teams and robust asset values.We found a relatively large number of such opportunities in the telecommunications services and utilities sectors, whose earnings historically have been relatively resistant to downturns. Maintaining underweighted positions in some of the more economically sensitive areas, such as retailers, also boosted the fund’s relative results. Finally, our security selection strategy proved to be effective in the leisure and capital goods industry groups.
On the other hand, our security selection strategy achieved less success in the energy and metals-and-mining areas, which fared relatively well for the Index as commodity prices soared. An underweighted position in bonds from information technology companies also detracted from relative performance.
Maintaining a Defensive Stance in an Uncertain Market
As of mid-year, the U.S. economy has continued to falter, and the credit crisis has persisted. Consequently, we have maintained the fund’s defensive posture, including an emphasis on less cyclical industries and issuers, such as those in the telecommunications, utilities, health care and cable television areas. Conversely, we have reduced the fund’s exposure to bonds from the leisure, automotive and gaming industries. We also have tended to favor senior debentures over subordinated debt, and we have maintained a diversified portfolio to help manage certain risks. In our view, these are prudent strategies in an uncertain economic climate.
July 15, 2008
1 | | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
| | consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares, or the applicable |
| | contingent deferred sales charges imposed on redemptions in the case of Class B and Class C |
| | shares. Had these charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no |
| | guarantee of future results. Share price, yield and investment return fluctuate such that upon |
| | redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. |
2 | | SOURCE: BLOOMBERG — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, |
| | capital gain distributions.The Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Constrained Index is an |
| | unmanaged performance benchmark composed of U.S. dollar-denominated domestic and Yankee |
| | bonds rated below investment grade with at least $100 million par amount outstanding and at |
| | least one year remaining to maturity. Bonds are capitalization-weighted.Total allocations to an |
| | issuer are capped at 2%.The index does not reflect fees and expenses to which the fund is subject. |
The Fund 5
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Premier Limited Term High Yield Fund from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | | | | | |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended June 30, 2008 | | | | |
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Expenses paid per $1,000 † | | $ 4.70 | | $ 7.16 | | $ 8.39 | | $ 3.47 |
Ending value (after expenses) | | $990.50 | | $986.60 | | $985.30 | | $991.60 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended June 30, 2008 |
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Expenses paid per $1,000 † | | $ 4.77 | | $ 7.27 | | $ 8.52 | | $ 3.52 |
Ending value (after expenses) | | $1,020.14 | | $1,017.65 | | $1,016.41 | | $1,021.38 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .95% for Class A, 1.45% for Class B, 1.70% for |
Class C and .70% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to |
reflect the one-half year period). |
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2008 (Unaudited)
| | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes—91.4% | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Advertising—1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Lamar Media, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes, Ser. B | | 6.63 | | 8/15/15 | | 429,000 | | 392,535 |
Lamar Media, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 6.63 | | 8/15/15 | | 1,725,000 a | | 1,578,375 |
R.H. Donnelley, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.88 | | 10/15/17 | | 1,530,000 b | | 918,000 |
| | | | | | | | 2,888,910 |
Aerospace & Defense—1.9% | | | | | | | | |
Esterline Technologies, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 6.63 | | 3/1/17 | | 1,375,000 | | 1,357,813 |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 9.75 | | 4/1/17 | | 1,290,000 a | | 1,296,450 |
L-3 Communications, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes, Ser. B | | 6.38 | | 10/15/15 | | 1,410,000 | | 1,325,400 |
UAL 2000, | | | | | | | | |
Pass-Through Ctfs., Ser. 00-2 | | 7.81 | | 4/11/11 | | 981,877 | | 1,114,430 |
| | | | | | | | 5,094,093 |
Agricultural—.3% | | | | | | | | |
Alliance One International, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 11.00 | | 5/15/12 | | 800,000 | | 828,000 |
Asset-Backed Ctfs./ | | | | | | | | |
Home Equity Loans—.0% | | | | | | | | |
Countrywide Asset-Backed | | | | | | | | |
Certificates, Ser. 2007-4, | | | | | | | | |
Cl. M7 | | 7.20 | | 9/25/37 | | 180,000 | | 18,742 |
Countrywide Asset-Backed | | | | | | | | |
Certificates, Ser. 2007-4, | | | | | | | | |
Cl. M8 | | 7.20 | | 9/25/37 | | 90,000 | | 38,934 |
| | | | | | | | 57,676 |
Automobile Manufacturers—.9% | | | | | | |
Ford Motor, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.45 | | 7/16/31 | | 835,000 | | 490,562 |
General Motors, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.20 | | 1/15/11 | | 1,325,000 a | | 1,023,562 |
General Motors, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.38 | | 7/15/33 | | 1,465,000 a | | 875,338 |
| | | | | | | | 2,389,462 |
The Fund 7
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Automotive, Trucks & Parts—1.4% | | | | | | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.63 | | 12/1/11 | | 461,000 | | 467,915 |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 9.00 | | 7/1/15 | | 838,000 a | | 840,095 |
Tenneco Automotive, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.63 | | 11/15/14 | | 410,000 | | 363,875 |
Tenneco Automotive, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes, Ser. B | | 10.25 | | 7/15/13 | | 618,000 | | 649,672 |
United Components, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 9.38 | | 6/15/13 | | 1,403,000 | | 1,318,820 |
| | | | | | | | 3,640,377 |
Chemicals—1.9% | | | | | | | | |
Airgas, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 6.25 | | 7/15/14 | | 750,000 a | | 742,500 |
Ineos Group Holdings, | | | | | | | | |
Scd. Notes | | 8.50 | | 2/15/16 | | 2,550,000 a,b | | 1,689,375 |
Nalco, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.88 | | 11/15/13 | | 2,653,000 | | 2,732,590 |
| | | | | | | | 5,164,465 |
Commercial & | | | | | | | | |
Professional Services—2.5% | | | | | | | | |
Aramark, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.50 | | 2/1/15 | | 627,000 | | 617,595 |
Corrections Corp. of America, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 6.25 | | 3/15/13 | | 1,710,000 | | 1,654,425 |
Education Management, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.75 | | 6/1/14 | | 625,000 | | 584,375 |
Education Management, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 10.25 | | 6/1/16 | | 1,401,000 a | | 1,295,925 |
Hertz, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.88 | | 1/1/14 | | 1,375,000 | | 1,265,000 |
Hertz, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 10.50 | | 1/1/16 | | 50,000 a | | 45,750 |
Ipayment, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 9.75 | | 5/15/14 | | 1,395,000 | | 1,185,750 |
| | | | | | | | 6,648,820 |
Commercial Mortgage | | | | | | | | |
Pass-Through Ctfs.—.4% | | | | | | | | |
Global Signal Trust, | | | | | | | | |
Ser. 2006-1, Cl. F | | 7.04 | | 2/15/36 | | 1,080,000 b | | 999,346 |
8
| | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Consumer Products—.3% | | | | | | | | |
Chattem, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Sub. Notes | | 7.00 | | 3/1/14 | | 826,000 | | 805,350 |
Diversified Financial Services—9.2% | | | | | | | | |
Chevy Chase Bank, | | | | | | | | |
Sub. Notes | | 6.88 | | 12/1/13 | | 2,365,000 | | 2,187,625 |
Ford Motor Credit, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.38 | | 10/28/09 | | 4,980,000 | | 4,537,029 |
Ford Motor Credit, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.00 | | 12/15/16 | | 920,000 | | 669,542 |
Ford Motor Credit, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.63 | | 11/1/10 | | 1,135,000 | | 963,302 |
GMAC, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unsub. Notes EUR | | 5.38 | | 6/6/11 | | 1,000,000 c | | 1,040,322 |
GMAC, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 5.63 | | 5/15/09 | | 235,000 a | | 217,630 |
GMAC, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.00 | | 2/1/12 | | 805,000 | | 559,963 |
GMAC, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.75 | | 1/19/10 | | 2,215,000 | | 1,894,755 |
GMAC, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.00 | | 11/1/31 | | 1,190,000 | | 775,719 |
HUB International Holdings, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Sub. Notes | | 10.25 | | 6/15/15 | | 2,580,000 b | | 2,128,500 |
Intelsat Jackson, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 11.25 | | 6/15/16 | | 3,855,000 | | 3,922,462 |
LVB Acquisition Merger, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Bonds | | 11.63 | | 10/15/17 | | 3,773,000 a,b | | 4,018,245 |
Lyondell Basell Industries, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 8.38 | | 8/15/15 | | 1,760,000 b | | 1,126,400 |
UCI Holdco, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 10.30 | | 12/15/13 | | 743,737 d | | 635,895 |
| | | | | | | | 24,677,389 |
Diversified Metals & Mining—2.1% | | | | | | | | |
Arch Western Finance, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 6.75 | | 7/1/13 | | 750,000 d | | 738,750 |
CSN Islands IX, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 10.50 | | 1/15/15 | | 1,500,000 b,d | | 1,755,000 |
Freeport-McMoRan Cooper & Gold, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.25 | | 4/1/15 | | 2,300,000 | | 2,421,003 |
The Fund 9
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Diversified Metals & Mining (continued) | | | | | | |
Peabody Energy, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes, Ser. B | | 6.88 | | 3/15/13 | | 805,000 a | | 811,037 |
| | | | | | | | 5,725,790 |
Electric Utilities—9.6% | | | | | | | | |
AES, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.75 | | 10/15/15 | | 2,025,000 a | | 2,004,750 |
AES, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.00 | | 10/15/17 | | 300,000 | | 295,500 |
Edison Mission Energy, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.00 | | 5/15/17 | | 200,000 | | 188,000 |
Edison Mission Energy, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.50 | | 6/15/13 | | 3,125,000 | | 3,117,188 |
Energy Future Holdings, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 10.88 | | 11/1/17 | | 6,960,000 b | | 7,064,400 |
Ipalco Enterprises, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 7.25 | | 4/1/16 | | 550,000 b | | 544,500 |
Mirant Americas Generation, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.30 | | 5/1/11 | | 1,625,000 | | 1,685,938 |
Mirant North America, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.38 | | 12/31/13 | | 2,315,000 | | 2,306,319 |
Nevada Power, | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage Notes, Ser. A | | 8.25 | | 6/1/11 | | 1,321,000 | | 1,426,939 |
NRG Energy, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.25 | | 2/1/14 | | 1,050,000 | | 1,005,375 |
NRG Energy, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.38 | | 1/15/17 | | 1,245,000 | | 1,179,638 |
Reliant Energy, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.63 | | 6/15/14 | | 2,985,000 a | | 2,925,300 |
Sierra Pacific Resources, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.63 | | 3/15/14 | | 1,910,000 | | 2,011,832 |
| | | | | | | | 25,755,679 |
Environmental Control—1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Allied Waste North America, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 6.88 | | 6/1/17 | | 2,155,000 a | | 2,117,288 |
WCA Waste, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 9.25 | | 6/15/14 | | 625,000 | | 629,688 |
| | | | | | | | 2,746,976 |
10
| | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Food & Beverages—2.0% | | | | | | | | |
Dean Foods, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.00 | | 6/1/16 | | 750,000 | | 654,375 |
Del Monte, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.63 | | 12/15/12 | | 1,031,000 d | | 1,051,620 |
Smithfield Foods, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes, Ser. B | | 7.75 | | 5/15/13 | | 700,000 | | 621,250 |
Smithfield Foods, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.75 | | 7/1/17 | | 750,000 | | 626,250 |
Stater Brothers Holdings, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.13 | | 6/15/12 | | 2,515,000 | | 2,540,150 |
| | | | | | | | 5,493,645 |
Health Care—6.9% | | | | | | | | |
Bausch & Lomb, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 9.88 | | 11/1/15 | | 2,530,000 a,b | | 2,548,975 |
Community Health Systems, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.88 | | 7/15/15 | | 1,395,000 | | 1,410,694 |
Davita, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 6.63 | | 3/15/13 | | 500,000 | | 482,500 |
Hanger Orthopedic Group, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 10.25 | | 6/1/14 | | 555,000 | | 573,037 |
HCA, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 6.30 | | 10/1/12 | | 7,830,000 | | 7,066,575 |
HCA, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 6.50 | | 2/15/16 | | 1,450,000 | | 1,214,375 |
HCA, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.75 | | 9/1/10 | | 854,000 | | 868,945 |
HCA, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 9.13 | | 11/15/14 | | 350,000 | | 358,750 |
HCA, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 9.25 | | 11/15/16 | | 1,300,000 | | 1,342,250 |
Idearc, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.00 | | 11/15/16 | | 2,330,000 | | 1,476,638 |
Psychiatric Solutions, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.75 | | 7/15/15 | | 630,000 | | 626,850 |
Tenet Healthcare, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 6.38 | | 12/1/11 | | 645,000 | | 620,813 |
| | | | | | | | 18,590,402 |
The Fund 11
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Holding Companies—1.4% | | | | | | | | |
Kansas City Southern Railway, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.50 | | 6/15/09 | | 600,000 | | 609,000 |
Leucadia National, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.13 | | 3/15/17 | | 2,315,000 | | 2,222,400 |
Stena, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Notes | | 7.50 | | 11/1/13 | | 1,001,000 | | 992,241 |
| | | | | | | | 3,823,641 |
Lodging & Entertainment—6.3% | | | | | | |
AMC Entertainment, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Sub. Notes | | 8.00 | | 3/1/14 | | 630,000 | | 562,275 |
Cinemark, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Discount Notes | | 9.34 | | 3/15/14 | | 2,125,000 e | | 2,029,375 |
Gaylord Entertainment, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.00 | | 11/15/13 | | 900,000 | | 868,500 |
Isle of Capri Casinos, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.00 | | 3/1/14 | | 1,240,000 a | | 880,400 |
Marquee Holdings, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Discount Notes | | 9.51 | | 8/15/14 | | 610,000 e | | 481,900 |
MGM Mirage, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.63 | | 1/15/17 | | 775,000 | | 641,312 |
MGM Mirage, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.38 | | 2/1/11 | | 2,120,000 | | 2,056,400 |
MGM Mirage, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.50 | | 9/15/10 | | 470,700 | | 467,170 |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 6.38 | | 7/15/09 | | 1,723,000 | | 1,714,385 |
Pinnacle Entertainment, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.75 | | 10/1/13 | | 580,000 | | 582,900 |
Pokagon Gaming Authority, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Notes | | 10.38 | | 6/15/14 | | 2,634,000 b | | 2,838,135 |
Scientific Games, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 6.25 | | 12/15/12 | | 637,000 a | | 613,113 |
Seneca Gaming, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes, Ser. B | | 7.25 | | 5/1/12 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,131,000 |
Shingle Springs Tribal Group, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Notes | | 9.38 | | 6/15/15 | | 1,130,000 b | | 923,775 |
Speedway Motorsports, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Sub. Notes | | 6.75 | | 6/1/13 | | 835,000 | | 818,300 |
Trump Entertainment Resorts, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 8.50 | | 6/1/15 | | 555,000 a | | 348,262 |
| | | | | | | | 16,957,202 |
12
| | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Machinery—1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Case, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 7.25 | | 1/15/16 | | 650,000 a | | 637,000 |
Columbus McKinnon, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.88 | | 11/1/13 | | 605,000 | | 626,175 |
Douglas Dynamics, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.75 | | 1/15/12 | | 835,000 b | | 720,187 |
Terex, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.38 | | 1/15/14 | | 640,000 | | 633,600 |
| | | | | | | | 2,616,962 |
Manufacturing—1.5% | | | | | | | | |
Bombardier, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 6.30 | | 5/1/14 | | 1,500,000 b | | 1,440,000 |
Bombardier, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.00 | | 11/15/14 | | 500,000 b | | 515,000 |
Mueller Water Products, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.38 | | 6/1/17 | | 385,000 | | 331,100 |
RBS Global & Rexnord, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 9.50 | | 8/1/14 | | 1,270,000 | | 1,231,900 |
RBS Global & Rexnord, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 11.75 | | 8/1/16 | | 525,000 a | | 506,625 |
| | | | | | | | 4,024,625 |
Media—7.6% | | | | | | | | |
Cablevision Systems, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes, Ser. B | | 8.00 | | 4/15/12 | | 2,128,000 d | | 2,021,600 |
CCH I, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 11.00 | | 10/1/15 | | 2,025,000 a | | 1,511,156 |
CCH II, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 10.25 | | 9/15/10 | | 4,280,000 a | | 4,162,300 |
CCH II, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 10.25 | | 10/1/13 | | 815,000 | | 739,612 |
CSC Holdings, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes, Ser. B | | 8.13 | | 7/15/09 | | 750,000 | | 757,500 |
Dex Media West/Finance, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes, Ser. B | | 8.50 | | 8/15/10 | | 520,000 a | | 516,100 |
Dex Media West/Finance, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Sub. Notes, Ser. B | | 9.88 | | 8/15/13 | | 3,539,000 | | 3,193,947 |
Echostar DBS, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 6.38 | | 10/1/11 | | 742,000 | | 717,885 |
Echostar DBS, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.13 | | 2/1/16 | | 975,000 | | 904,312 |
The Fund 13
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Media (continued) | | | | | | | | |
ION Media Networks, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Sub. Notes | | 11.00 | | 7/31/13 | | 35,172 b | | 10,024 |
Kabel Deutschland, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 10.63 | | 7/1/14 | | 1,795,000 | | 1,844,363 |
LBI Media, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Sub. Notes | | 8.50 | | 8/1/17 | | 1,300,000 b | | 1,007,500 |
Mediacom, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 9.50 | | 1/15/13 | | 2,225,000 | | 2,108,188 |
Nexstar Broadcasting, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.00 | | 1/15/14 | | 410,000 | | 358,750 |
Nexstar Finance Holdings, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Discount Notes | | 11.38 | | 4/1/13 | | 611,057 e | | 589,670 |
| | | | | | | | 20,442,907 |
Oil & Gas—4.9% | | | | | | | | |
Chesapeake Energy, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.00 | | 8/15/14 | | 1,240,000 | | 1,221,400 |
Chesapeake Energy, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.50 | | 6/15/14 | | 775,000 | | 773,062 |
Cimarex Energy | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.13 | | 5/1/17 | | 1,610,000 | | 1,589,875 |
Dynegy Holdings, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.38 | | 5/1/16 | | 2,435,000 a | | 2,374,125 |
Dynegy Holdings, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.75 | | 2/15/12 | | 270,000 | | 275,400 |
Range Resources, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.25 | | 5/1/18 | | 115,000 a | | 114,713 |
Whiting Petroleum, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.25 | | 5/1/13 | | 2,000,000 | | 1,995,000 |
Williams Cos., | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 4.70 | | 10/1/10 | | 2,375,000 b,d | | 2,315,625 |
Williams Cos., | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.13 | | 9/1/11 | | 250,000 | | 260,000 |
Williams Cos., | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.63 | | 7/15/19 | | 975,000 | | 1,028,625 |
Williams Cos., | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 7.88 | | 9/1/21 | | 1,170,000 | | 1,246,050 |
| | | | | | | | 13,193,875 |
14
| | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Packaging & Containers—4.5% | | | | | | | | |
Crown Americas, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.63 | | 11/15/13 | | 249,000 | | 249,622 |
Crown Americas, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.75 | | 11/15/15 | | 3,835,000 | | 3,854,175 |
Jefferson Smurfit, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.25 | | 10/1/12 | | 500,000 | | 438,750 |
Norampac, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 6.75 | | 6/1/13 | | 2,380,000 a | | 2,011,100 |
Owens Brockway Glass Container, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 6.75 | | 12/1/14 | | 519,000 | | 521,595 |
Owens Brockway Glass Container, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.25 | | 5/15/13 | | 515,000 | | 530,450 |
Plastipak Holdings, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Notes | | 8.50 | | 12/15/15 | | 1,700,000 b | | 1,581,000 |
Smurfit-Stone Container, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.00 | | 3/15/17 | | 2,125,000 a | | 1,710,625 |
Smurfit-Stone Container, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | 8.38 | | 7/1/12 | | 1,365,000 | | 1,204,613 |
| | | | | | | | 12,101,930 |
Paper & Forest Products—3.2% | | | | | | | | |
Georgia-Pacific, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 7.00 | | 1/15/15 | | 2,210,000 b | | 2,088,450 |
Newpage, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 12.00 | | 5/1/13 | | 2,670,000 a | | 2,710,050 |
Verso Paper, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes, Ser. B | | 11.38 | | 8/1/16 | | 3,870,000 | | 3,686,175 |
| | | | | | | | 8,484,675 |
Real Estate | | | | | | | | |
Investment Trusts—1.4% | | | | | | | | |
B.F. Saul REIT, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | 7.50 | | 3/1/14 | | 1,185,000 | | 1,030,950 |
Host Hotels & Resorts, | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes, Ser. M | | 7.00 | | 8/15/12 | | 2,500,000 | | 2,375,000 |
Realogy, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 12.38 | | 4/15/15 | | 530,000 a | | 262,350 |
| | | | | | | | 3,668,300 |
The Fund 15
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Retail—3.6% | | | | | | | | | | |
Amerigas Partners, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 7.25 | | 5/20/15 | | 1,245,000 | | 1,170,300 |
Central European | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Bonds | | EUR | | 8.00 | | 7/25/12 | | 500,000 b,c | | 771,483 |
Invista, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 9.25 | | 5/1/12 | | 3,710,000 b | | 3,812,025 |
Levi Strauss & Co., | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unsub. Notes | | | | 9.75 | | 1/15/15 | | 1,350,000 | | 1,363,500 |
Neiman Marcus Group, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 9.00 | | 10/15/15 | | 665,000 | | 660,012 |
Neiman Marcus Group, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 10.38 | | 10/15/15 | | 947,000 a | | 951,735 |
Rite Aid, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 9.38 | | 12/15/15 | | 895,000 | | 604,125 |
Rite Aid, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 10.38 | | 7/1/16 | | 320,000 | | 289,882 |
| | | | | | | | | | 9,623,062 |
Special Purpose Entity—.3% | | | | | | | | |
Smurfit Kappa Funding, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Sub. Notes | | | | 7.75 | | 4/1/15 | | 999,000 | | 914,085 |
Specialty Steel—.4% | | | | | | | | | | |
Steel Dynamics, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Notes | | | | 7.38 | | 11/1/12 | | 1,200,000 b | | 1,206,000 |
Technology—3.7% | | | | | | | | | | |
Amkor Technologies, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 9.25 | | 6/1/16 | | 750,000 | | 718,125 |
Belden, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Sub. Notes | | | | 7.00 | | 3/15/17 | | 500,000 | | 482,500 |
Ceridian, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 11.25 | | 11/15/15 | | 4,645,000 b | | 4,226,950 |
First Data, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 9.88 | | 9/24/15 | | 1,500,000 b | | 1,306,875 |
Freescale Semiconductor, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 8.88 | | 12/15/14 | | 1,285,000 | | 1,050,488 |
Sungard Data Systems, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | �� | | | 10.25 | | 8/15/15 | | 2,100,000 | | 2,121,000 |
| | | | | | | | | | 9,905,938 |
16
| | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Telecommunications—9.8% | | | | | | | | | | |
Alltel, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 7.00 | | 7/1/12 | | 3,560,000 | | 3,649,000 |
Centennial Cellular Operating, | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 10.13 | | 6/15/13 | | 815,000 | | 843,525 |
Centennial Communication, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 10.00 | | 1/1/13 | | 674,000 a | | 687,480 |
Centennial Communications, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 8.13 | | 2/1/14 | | 600,000 a,d | | 597,000 |
Citizens Communications, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 6.25 | | 1/15/13 | | 740,000 | | 690,050 |
Cricket Communications I, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 9.38 | | 11/1/14 | | 740,000 a | | 715,950 |
Digicel Group, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 8.88 | | 1/15/15 | | 1,335,000 a,b | | 1,263,244 |
Digicel Group, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 9.13 | | 1/15/15 | | 1,712,000 a,b | | 1,619,980 |
General Cable, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 7.13 | | 4/1/17 | | 1,330,000 | | 1,273,475 |
Intelsat, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 6.50 | | 11/1/13 | | 3,710,000 a | | 2,629,462 |
Intelsat, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 7.63 | | 4/15/12 | | 1,565,000 | | 1,259,825 |
MetroPCS Wireless, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | | | 9.25 | | 11/1/14 | | 1,475,000 | | 1,427,062 |
Nordic Telephone Holdings, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Notes | | EUR | | 8.25 | | 5/1/16 | | 1,175,000 b,c | | 1,692,737 |
Nordic Telephone Holdings, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Bonds | | | | 8.88 | | 5/1/16 | | 300,000 b | | 295,500 |
Qwest, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 6.03 | | 6/15/13 | | 367,000 d | | 352,320 |
Qwest, | | | | | | | | | | |
Bank Note, Ser. B | | | | 6.95 | | 6/30/10 | | 375,000 d | | 378,750 |
Qwest, | | | | | | | | | | |
Bank Note, Ser. B | | | | 6.95 | | 6/30/10 | | 477,000 d | | 481,770 |
Qwest, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 7.50 | | 10/1/14 | | 650,000 | | 628,875 |
Qwest, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unscd. Notes | | | | 7.88 | | 9/1/11 | | 440,000 | | 442,200 |
The Fund 17
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | Coupon | | Maturity | | Principal | | | | |
Bonds and Notes (continued) | | Rate (%) | | Date | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Telecommunications (continued) | | | | | | | | |
Sprint Capital, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 6.88 | | 11/15/28 | | 950,000 | | | | 792,846 |
US Unwired, | | | | | | | | | | |
Scd. Notes, Ser. B | | 10.00 | | 6/15/12 | | 2,149,000a | | | | 2,197,395 |
Wind Acquisition Finance, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Scd. Bonds | | 10.75 | | 12/1/15 | | 500,000b | | | | 527,500 |
Windstream, | | | | | | | | | | |
Gtd. Notes | | 8.13 | | 8/1/13 | | 1,919,000 | | | | 1,923,797 |
| | | | | | | | | | 26,369,743 |
Transportation—.3% | | | | | | | | | | |
Kansas City Southern of Mexico, | | | | | | | | | | |
Sr. Unsub. Notes | | 7.63 | | 12/1/13 | | 825,000 | | | | 804,375 |
Total Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | |
(cost $258,156,018) | | | | | | | | | | 245,643,700 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Preferred Stocks—.4% | | | | | | Shares | | | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Media | | | | | | | | | | |
Spanish Broadcasting System, | | | | | | | | | | |
Ser. B, Cum. $107.5 | | | | | | | | | | |
(cost $1,557,951) | | | | | | 1,482 | | | | 967,015 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Common Stocks—.4% | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Cable & Media—.0% | | | | | | | | | | |
Time Warner Cable, Cl. A | | | | | | 8f | | | | 212 |
Computers—.1% | | | | | | | | | | |
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Cl. A | | | | | | 39,736f | | | | 301,994 |
Electric Utilities—.1% | | | | | | | | | | |
Mirant | | | | | | 9,276a,f | | | | 363,155 |
Telecommunications—.2% | | | | | | | | | | |
Above Net | | | | | | 4,952f | | | | 321,880 |
Above Net (warrants 9/8/2008) | | | | | | 621f | | | | 27,945 |
Above Net (warrants 9/8/2010) | | | | | | 279f | | | | 11,439 |
| | | | | | | | | | 361,264 |
Total Common Stocks | | | | | | | | | | |
(cost $755,746) | | | | | | | | | | 1,026,625 |
18
Other Investment—6.8% | | Shares | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
|
Registered Investment Company; | | | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | | | | |
Plus Money Market Fund | | | | |
(cost $18,407,000) | | 18,407,000 g | | 18,407,000 |
| |
| |
|
|
Investment of Cash Collateral | | | | |
for Securities Loaned—11.0% | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Registered Investment Company; | | | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Cash | | | | |
Advantage Fund | | | | |
(cost $29,580,795) | | 29,580,795 g | | 29,580,795 |
| |
| |
|
|
Total Investments (cost $308,457,510) | | 110.0% | | 295,625,135 |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | | (10.0%) | | (26,967,100) |
Net Assets | | 100.0% | | 268,658,035 |
a All or a portion of these securities are on loan. At June 30, 2008, the total market value of the fund’s securities on |
loan is $27,948,835 and the total market value of the collateral held by the fund is $29,799,195 consisting of |
$29,580,795 of cash collateral and U.S. Government and agencies securities valued at $218,400. |
b Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in |
transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At June 30, 2008, these securities |
amounted to $52,954,731 or 19.7% of net assets. |
c Principal amount stated in U.S. Dollars unless otherwise noted. |
EUR—Euro |
d Variable rate security—interest rate subject to periodic change. |
e Zero coupon until a specified date at which time the stated coupon rate becomes effective until maturity. |
f Non-income producing security. |
g Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited) † | | | | |
|
| | Value (%) | | | | Value (%) |
| |
| |
| |
|
Corporate Bonds | | 91.0 | | Preferred Stocks | | .4 |
Money Market Investments | | 17.8 | | Common Stocks | | .4 |
Asset/Mortgage-Backed | | .4 | | | | 110.0 |
† Based on net assets. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 19
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
June 30, 2008 (Unaudited) |
| | Cost | | Value |
| |
| |
|
Assets ($): | | | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement | | | | |
of Investments (including securities on loan, | | |
valued at $27,948,835)—Note 1(c): | | | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | 260,469,715 | | 247,637,340 |
Affiliated issuers | | 47,987,795 | | 47,987,795 |
Cash denominated in foreign currencies | | 157,799 | | 161,139 |
Dividends and interest receivable | | | | 5,247,808 |
Receivable for investment securities sold | | | | 953,293 |
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | | 405,018 |
Prepaid expenses | | | | 21,269 |
| | | | 302,413,662 |
| |
| |
|
Liabilities ($): | | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(b) | | 245,902 |
Cash overdraft due to Custodian | | | | 962,916 |
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(c) | | | | 29,580,795 |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | 2,463,091 |
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | | 405,683 |
Unrealized depreciation on forward | | | | |
currency exchange contracts—Note 4 | | | | 97,240 |
| | | | 33,755,627 |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($) | | | | 268,658,035 |
| |
| |
|
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | | 730,784,724 |
Accumulated distributions in | | | | |
excess of investment income—net | | | | (662,006) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | (448,539,346) |
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | |
on investments and foreign currency transactions | | (12,925,337) |
| |
|
Net Assets ($) | | | | 268,658,035 |
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($) | | 155,354,038 | | 28,585,802 | | 48,803,137 | | 35,915,058 |
Shares Outstanding | | 23,590,548 | | 4,336,533 | | 7,401,708 | | 5,451,678 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | | 6.59 | | 6.59 | | 6.59 | | 6.59 |
See notes to financial statements.
20
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | | |
Income: | | |
Interest | | 10,862,838 |
Income from securities lending | | 129,207 |
Dividends: | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | 87,606 |
Affiliated issuers | | 112,828 |
Total Income | | 11,192,479 |
Expenses: | | |
Management fee—Note 3(a) | | 925,043 |
Distribution fees and service fees—Note 3(b) | | 576,328 |
Trustees’ fees—Note 3(a) | | 10,205 |
Total Expenses | | 1,511,576 |
Less-Trustees’ fees reimbursed by the Manager—Note 3(a) | | (10,205) |
Net Expenses | | 1,501,371 |
Investment Income-Net | | 9,691,108 |
| |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | | (6,250,394) |
Net realized gain (loss) on swap transactions | | (27,953) |
Net realized gain (loss) on forward currency exchange contracts | | (360,478) |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | | (6,638,825) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, | | |
swap transactions and foreign currency transactions | | (6,650,267) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | | (13,289,092) |
Net (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | | (3,597,984) |
See notes to financial statements.
The Fund 21
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | Six Months Ended | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | Year Ended |
| | (Unaudited) | | December 31, 2007a |
| |
| |
|
Operations ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net | | 9,691,108 | | 20,949,349 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | (6,638,825) | | (4,495,082) |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | | |
(depreciation) on investments | | (6,650,267) | | (11,353,579) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | |
Resulting from Operations | | (3,597,984) | | 5,100,688 |
| |
| |
|
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net: | | | | |
Class A Shares | | (6,435,808) | | (13,922,341) |
Class B Shares | | (1,206,841) | | (3,561,162) |
Class C Shares | | (1,786,629) | | (3,977,856) |
Class I Shares | | (753,906) | | (1,317,667) |
Total Dividends | | (10,183,184) | | (22,779,026) |
| |
| |
|
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | | | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | | | |
Class A Shares | | 15,961,711 | | 22,371,989 |
Class B Shares | | 159,409 | | 551,723 |
Class C Shares | | 2,127,119 | | 4,606,504 |
Class I Shares | | 22,453,556 | | 8,226,009 |
Dividends reinvested: | | | | |
Class A Shares | | 3,597,933 | | 7,383,384 |
Class B Shares | | 684,498 | | 1,862,672 |
Class C Shares | | 746,245 | | 1,617,711 |
Class I Shares | | 668,698 | | 1,285,311 |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | | | |
Class A Shares | | (25,504,260) | | (51,863,201) |
Class B Shares | | (10,426,258) | | (27,684,167) |
Class C Shares | | (4,796,154) | | (15,258,190) |
Class I Shares | | (3,239,983) | | (9,133,542) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | |
from Beneficial Interest Transactions | | 2,432,514 | | (56,033,797) |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | (11,348,654) | | (73,712,135) |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Beginning of Period | | 280,006,689 | | 353,718,824 |
End of Period | | 268,658,035 | | 280,006,689 |
Distributions in excess of investment Income—net | | (662,006) | | (169,930) |
22
| | Six Months Ended | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | Year Ended |
| | (Unaudited) | | December 31, 2007a |
| |
| |
|
Capital Share Transactions: | | | | |
Class Ab | | | | |
Shares sold | | 2,372,615 | | 3,102,079 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | 537,156 | | 1,030,483 |
Shares redeemed | | (3,803,749) | | (7,218,058) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | | (893,978) | | (3,085,496) |
| |
| |
|
Class B b | | | | |
Shares sold | | 23,090 | | 76,165 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | 102,079 | | 258,768 |
Shares redeemed | | (1,546,954) | | (3,821,909) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | | (1,421,785) | | (3,486,976) |
| |
| |
|
Class C | | | | |
Shares sold | | 315,484 | | 637,961 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | 111,303 | | 225,125 |
Shares redeemed | | (716,006) | | (2,127,924) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | | (289,219) | | (1,264,838) |
| |
| |
|
Class I | | | | |
Shares sold | | 3,326,261 | | 1,147,277 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | 99,828 | | 178,834 |
Shares redeemed | | (482,688) | | (1,280,725) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | | 2,943,401 | | 45,386 |
a | | Effective June 1, 2007, Class R shares were redesignated as Class I shares. |
b | | During the period ended June 30, 2008, 447,860 Class B shares representing $3,021,313, were automatically |
| | converted to 448,389 Class A shares and during the period ended December 31, 2007, 1,205,939 Class B shares |
| | representing $8,746,306 were automatically converted to 1,207,249 Class A shares. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 23
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following tables describe the performance for each share class for the fiscal periods indicated. All information (except portfolio turnover rate) reflects financial results for a single fund share.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Class A Shares | | (Unaudited) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004a | | 2003 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 6.92 | | 7.33 | | 7.24 | | 7.65 | | 7.43 | | 6.28 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net b | | .25 | | .49 | | .49 | | .51 | | .52 | | .63 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | | (.32) | | (.37) | | .14 | | (.36) | | .23 | | 1.17 |
Total from Investment Operations | | (.07) | | .12 | | .63 | | .15 | | .75 | | 1.80 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from investment | | | | | | | | | | | | |
income—net | | (.26) | | (.53) | | (.54) | | (.56) | | (.53) | | (.65) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 6.59 | | 6.92 | | 7.33 | | 7.24 | | 7.65 | | 7.43 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) c | | (.95)d | | 2.03 | | 8.66 | | 2.22 | | 10.44 | | 29.87 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | .95e | | .96 | | .95 | | .95 | | .95 | | .97 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | .95e,f | | .95 | | .95 | | .95 | | .95 | | .97 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 7.52e | | 6.78 | | 6.76 | | 6.93 | | 7.00 | | 8.87 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | 27.94d | | 50.65 | | 29.98 | | 40.57 | | 129.27 | | 235.42 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 155,354 | | 169,453 | | 202,098 | | 236,421 | | 286,342 | | 191,270 |
a | | As of January 1, 2004, the fund has adopted the method of accounting for interim payments on swap contracts in |
| | accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 133.These interim payments are reflected |
| | within net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on swap contracts, however, prior to January 1, 2004, these interim |
| | payments were reflected within interest income/expense in the Statement of Operations.The effect of this change for |
| | the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, was to increase net investment income per share by less than $.01, decrease |
| | net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share by less than $.01 and had no effect on the ratio of |
| | net investment income to average net assets. |
b | | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | | Not annualized. |
e | | Annualized. |
f | | Expense waivers and/or reimbursements amounted to less than .01%. |
See notes to financial statements. |
24
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Class B Shares | | (Unaudited) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004a | | 2003 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 6.93 | | 7.34 | | 7.24 | | 7.65 | | 7.43 | | 6.28 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net b | | .23 | | .45 | | .45 | | .46 | | .47 | | .59 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | | (.32) | | (.37) | | .16 | | (.35) | | .25 | | 1.18 |
Total from Investment Operations | | (.09) | | .08 | | .61 | | .11 | | .72 | | 1.77 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from investment | | | | | | | | | | | | |
income—net | | (.25) | | (.49) | | (.51) | | (.52) | | (.50) | | (.62) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 6.59 | | 6.93 | | 7.34 | | 7.24 | | 7.65 | | 7.43 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) c | | (1.34)d | | 1.53 | | 8.12 | | 1.73 | | 10.06 | | 29.25 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.45e | | 1.46 | | 1.45 | | 1.45 | | 1.45 | | 1.47 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.45e,f | | 1.45 | | 1.45 | | 1.45 | | 1.45 | | 1.47 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 7.02e | | 6.24 | | 6.25 | | 6.36 | | 6.50 | | 8.46 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | 27.94d | | 50.65 | | 29.98 | | 40.57 | | 129.27 | | 235.42 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 28,586 | | 39,892 | | 67,834 | | 96,334 | | 167,756 | | 239,015 |
a | | As of January 1, 2004, the fund has adopted the method of accounting for interim payments on swap contracts in |
| | accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 133.These interim payments are reflected |
| | within net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on swap contracts, however, prior to January 1, 2004, these interim |
| | payments were reflected within interest income/expense in the Statement of Operations.The effect of this change for |
| | the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, was to increase net investment income per share by less than $.01, decrease |
| | net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share by less than $.01 and had no effect on the ratio of |
| | net investment income to average net assets. |
b | | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | | Not annualized. |
e | | Annualized. |
f | | Expense waivers and/or reimbursements amounted to less than .01%. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 25
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Class C Shares | | (Unaudited) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004a | | 2003 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 6.93 | | 7.34 | | 7.24 | | 7.65 | | 7.43 | | 6.28 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net b | | .23 | | .43 | | .43 | | .45 | | .46 | | .57 |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(loss) on investments | | (.33) | | (.36) | | .16 | | (.36) | | .24 | | 1.18 |
Total from Investment Operations | | (.10) | | .07 | | .59 | | .09 | | .70 | | 1.75 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from investment | | | | | | | | | | | | |
income—net | | (.24) | | (.48) | | (.49) | | (.50) | | (.48) | | (.60) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 6.59 | | 6.93 | | 7.34 | | 7.24 | | 7.65 | | 7.43 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) c | | (1.47)d | | 1.28 | | 7.85 | | 1.48 | | 9.63 | | 29.10 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.70e | | 1.71 | | 1.70 | | 1.70 | | 1.70 | | 1.72 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.70e,f | | 1.70 | | 1.70 | | 1.70 | | 1.70 | | 1.72 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 6.77e | | 6.02 | | 6.01 | | 6.14 | | 6.26 | | 8.15 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | 27.94d | | 50.65 | | 29.98 | | 40.57 | | 129.27 | | 235.42 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 48,803 | | 53,294 | | 65,728 | | 74,770 | | 115,309 | | 86,479 |
a | | As of January 1, 2004, the fund has adopted the method of accounting for interim payments on swap contracts in |
| | accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 133.These interim payments are reflected |
| | within net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on swap contracts, however, prior to January 1, 2004, these interim |
| | payments were reflected within interest income/expense in the Statement of Operations.The effect of this change for |
| | the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, was to increase net investment income per share by less than $.01, decrease |
| | net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share by less than $.01 and had no effect on the ratio of |
| | net investment income to average net assets. |
b | | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | | Not annualized. |
e | | Annualized. |
f | | Expense waivers and/or reimbursements amounted to less than .01%. |
See notes to financial statements. |
26
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Class I Shares | | (Unaudited) | | 2007a | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004b | | 2003 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 6.92 | | 7.33 | | 7.24 | | 7.65 | | 7.43 | | 6.27 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net c | | .25 | | .52 | | .51 | | .53 | | .52 | | .67 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | | (.31) | | (.38) | | .14 | | (.36) | | .25 | | 1.16 |
Total from Investment Operations | | (.06) | | .14 | | .65 | | .17 | | .77 | | 1.83 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from investment | | | | | | | | | | | | |
income—net | | (.27) | | (.55) | | (.56) | | (.58) | | (.55) | | (.67) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 6.59 | | 6.92 | | 7.33 | | 7.24 | | 7.65 | | 7.43 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) | | (.84)d | | 2.29 | | 8.92 | | 2.34 | | 10.87 | | 30.15 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | .70e | | .71 | | .70 | | .70 | | .70 | | .72 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | .70e,f | | .70 | | .70 | | .70 | | .70 | | .72 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 7.78e | | 7.01 | | 7.01 | | 7.18 | | 7.31 | | 9.26 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | 27.94d | | 50.65 | | 29.98 | | 40.57 | | 129.27 | | 235.42 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 35,915 | | 17,368 | | 18,059 | | 18,595 | | 21,714 | | 1,283 |
a | | Effective June 1, 2007, Class R shares were redesignated as Class I shares. |
b | | As of January 1, 2004, the fund has adopted the method of accounting for interim payments on swap contracts in |
| | accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 133.These interim payments are reflected |
| | within net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on swap contracts, however, prior to January 1, 2004, these interim |
| | payments were reflected within interest income/expense in the Statement of Operations.The effect of this change for |
| | the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, was to increase net investment income per share by less than $.01, decrease |
| | net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share by less than $.01 and had no effect on the ratio of |
| | net investment income to average net assets. |
c | | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
d | | Not annualized. |
e | | Annualized. |
f | | Expense waivers and/or reimbursements amounted to less than .01%. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 27
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ( U n a u d i t e d )
NOTE 1-Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Premier Limited Term High Yield Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust (the “Trust”) which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering seven series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is to seek to maximize total return, consisting of capital appreciation and current income. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment manager.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares. The fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of Beneficial Interest in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class B, Class C and Class I. Class A, Class B and Class C shares are sold primarily to retail investors through financial intermediaries and bear a distribution fee and/or service fee. Class A shares are sold with a front-end sales charge, while Class B and Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”). Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares after six years.The fund does not offer Class B shares, except in connection with dividend reinvestment and permitted exchanges of Class B shares. Class I shares are sold primarily to bank trust departments and other financial service providers (including Mellon Bank, N.A. (“Mellon Bank”), a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and a Dreyfus affiliate) acting on behalf of customers having a qualified trust or investment account or relationship at such institution, and bear no distribution or service fees. Class I shares are offered without a front-end sales charge or CDSC. Each class of shares has identical rights and privileges, except with respect to distribution, service fees and voting rights on matters affecting a single class. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
28
The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities excluding short-term investments (other than U.S. Treasury Bills), financial futures, options, swaps and forward currency exchange contracts are valued each business day by an independent pricing service (the “Service”) approved by the Board of Trustees. Investments for which quoted bid prices are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the market in the judgment of the Service are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices (as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices (as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such securities). Other investments (which constitute a majority of the portfolio securities) are valued as determined by the Service, based on methods which include consideration of: yields or prices of securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions. Restricted securities, as well as securities or other assets for which recent market quotations are not readily available and are not valued by a pricing service approved by the Board of Trustees, or are determined by the fund not to reflect accurately fair value are valued at fair value as determined in good faith under the direction of the Board of Trustees.The factors that may be considered when fair valuing a security include fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. Short-term investments, excluding U.S.Treasury Bills, are carried at amortized cost, which approximates value. Registered open-end investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value. Financial futures and options, which are traded on an exchange, are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange on which such
The Fund 29
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
securities are primarily traded or at the last sales price on the national securities market on each business day. Options traded over-the-counter are priced at the mean between the bid and asked price. Investments denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at the prevailing rates of exchange. Forward currency exchange contracts are valued at the forward rate. Investments in swap transactions are valued each business day by an independent pricing service approved by the Board of Trustees. Swaps are valued by the service by using a swap pricing model which incorporates among other factors, default probabilities, recovery rates, credit curves of the underlying issuer and swap spreads on interest rates.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes an authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair-value measurements. The application of FAS 157 is required for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to FAS 157.
These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
30
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2008 in valuing the fund’s investments carried at fair value:
| | Investments in | | Other Financial |
Valuation Inputs | | Securities ($) | | Instruments ($)† |
| |
| |
|
Level 1—Quoted Prices | | 49,014,420 | | 0 |
Level 2—Other Significant | | | | |
Observable Inputs | | 246,610,715 | | (97,240) |
Level 3—Significant | | | | |
Unobservable Inputs | | 0 | | 0 |
Total | | 295,625,135 | | (97,240) |
† | | Other financial instruments include derivative instruments such as futures, forward currency |
| | exchange contracts and swap contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation |
| | (depreciation) on the instrument. |
(b) Foreign currency transactions: The fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in the market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales and maturities of short-term securities, sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized on securities transactions and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities other than investments in securities, resulting from changes in exchange rates. Such gains and losses are included with net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
(c) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis.
The Fund 31
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with Mellon Bank, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy, that at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or Letters of Credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction.Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended June 30, 2008, Mellon Bank earned $69,573 from lending fund portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
(e) Concentration of Risk: The fund invests primarily in debt securities. Failure of an issuer of the debt securities to make timely interest or principal payments, or a decline or the perception of a decline in the credit quality of a debt security, can cause the debt security’s price to fall, potentially lowering the fund’s share price. High yield (“junk”) bonds involve greater credit risk, including the risk of default, than investment grade bonds, and are considered predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s continuing ability to make principal and interest payments. In addition, the value of debt securities may decline due to general market conditions that are not specifically related to a particular company, such as real or perceived adverse eco-
32
(d) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by the Manager are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
nomic conditions, changes in outlook for corporate earnings, changes in interest or currency rates or adverse investor sentiment. They may also decline because of factors that affect a particular industry.
(f) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
(g) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
During the current year, the fund adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the fund’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. The adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on the operations of the fund for the period ended June 30, 2008.
The Fund 33
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
As of and during the period ended June 30, 2008, the fund did not have any liabilities for any unrecognized tax benefits.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $438,156,194 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to December 31, 2007. If not applied, $53,989,658 of carryover expires in fiscal 2008, $161,394,992 expires in fiscal 2009, $138,776,715 expires in fiscal 2010, $72,493,638 expires in fiscal 2011, $6,851,219 expires in fiscal 2013 and $4,649,972 expires in fiscal 2015. Based on certain provisions in the Internal Revenue Code, various limitations regarding the future utilization of these carry forwards, brought as a result of the fund’s merger with the following funds may apply: Dreyfus Short Term High Yield Fund, Dreyfus Premier High Yield Securities Fund and High Yield Total Fund. It is probable that the fund will not be able to utilize most of its capital loss carryovers prior to its expiration date.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 was as follows: ordinary income $22,779,026. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
Prior to May 1, 2008, the fund had the ability to borrow up to $20 million for leveraging purposes under a short-term unsecured line of credit. Effective May 1, 2008, the fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $300 million unsecured line of credit primarily to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowing. Prior
34
to May 1, 2008, the fund participated with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $100 million unsecured line of credit. During the period ended June 30, 2008, the fund did not borrow under either line of credit.
NOTE 3—Investment Management Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to an Investment Management Agreement with the Manager, the Manager provides or arranges for one or more third parties and/or affiliates to provide investment advisory, administrative, custody, fund accounting and transfer agency services to the fund.The Manager also directs the investments of the fund in accordance with its investment objective, policies and limitations. For these services, the fund is contractually obligated to pay the Manager a fee, calculated daily and paid monthly, at the annual rate of .70% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets. Out of its fee, the Manager pays all of the expenses of the fund except brokerage fees, taxes, interest, commitment fees, Rule 12b-1 distribution fees and expenses, service fees and expenses of non-interested Trustees (including counsel fees) and extraordinary expenses. In addition, the Manager is required to reduce its fee in an amount equal to the fund’s allocable portion of fees and expenses of the non-interested Trustees (including counsel fees). Each Trustee receives $45,000 per year, plus $6,000 for each joint Board meeting of The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc.,The Dreyfus/Laurel Tax-Free Municipal Funds and the Trust (collectively, the “Dreyfus/Laurel Funds”) attended, $2,000 for separate in-person committee meetings attended which are not held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board meeting and $1,500 for Board meetings and separate committee meetings attended that are conducted by telephone and is reimbursed for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. With respect to Board meetings, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional 25% of such compensation (with the exception of reimbursable amounts). With respect to compensation committee meetings, the Chair of the compensation committee receives $900 per meeting and, with respect to audit committee meetings prior to April 12, 2008, the Chair of the
The Fund 35
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
audit committee received $1,350 per meeting. In the event that there is an in-person joint committee meeting of the Dreyfus/Laurel Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund, the $2,000 or $1,500 fee, as applicable, will be allocated between the Dreyfus/Laurel Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund. These fees and expenses are charged and allocated to each series based on net assets. Amounts required to be paid by the Trust directly to the non-interested Trustees, that would be applied to offset a portion of the management fee payable to the Manager, are in fact paid directly by the Manager to the non-interested Trustees.
During the period ended June 30, 2008, the Distributor retained $1,120 from commissions earned on sales of the fund’s Class A shares and $59,048 and $3,509 from CDSCs on redemptions of the fund’s Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
(b) Under separate Distribution Plans (the “Plans”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class A shares pay annually up to .25% of the value of the average daily net assets to compensate the Distributor for shareholder servicing activities and expenses primarily intended to result in the sale of Class A shares. Class B and Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing their shares at an aggregate annual rate of .50% and .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares, respectively. Class B and Class C shares are also subject to a service plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (the “Service Plan”), under which Class B and Class C shares pay the Distributor for providing certain services to the holders of their shares a fee at the annual rate of .25% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. During the period ended June 30, 2008, Class A, Class B and Class C shares were charged $203,897, $81,498 and $187,638, respectively, pursuant to their respective Plans. During the period ended June 30, 2008, Class B and Class C shares were charged $40,749 and $62,546, respectively, pursuant to the Service Plan.
36
Under its terms, the Plans and Service Plan shall remain in effect from year to year, provided such continuance is approved annually by a vote of a majority of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of or in any agreement related to the Plans or Service Plan.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $153,621, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $16,204 and service plan fees $76,077.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales (including paydowns) of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, forward currency exchange contracts and swap transactions during the period ended June 30, 2008, amounted to $71,005,033 and $80,423,636, respectively.
The fund enters into forward currency exchange contracts in order to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on its foreign portfolio holdings and to settle foreign currency transac-tions.When executing forward currency exchange contracts, the fund is obligated to buy or sell a foreign currency at a specified rate on a certain date in the future. With respect to sales of forward currency exchange contracts, the fund would incur a loss if the value of the contract increases between the date the forward contract is opened and the date the forward contract is closed.The fund realizes a gain if the value of the contract decreases between those dates. With respect to purchases of forward currency exchange contracts, the fund would incur a loss if the value of the contract decreases between the date the forward contract is opened and the date the forward contract is closed. The fund realizes a gain if the value of the contract increases between those dates. The fund is also exposed to credit risk associated with
The Fund 37
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
counterparty nonperformance on these forward currency exchange contracts which is typically limited to the unrealized gain on each open contract. The following summarizes open forward currency exchange contracts at June 30, 2008:
| | Foreign | | | | | | |
Forward Currency | | Currency | | | | | | Unrealized |
Exchange Contracts | | Amounts | | Proceeds ($) | | Value ($) | | (Depreciation) ($) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Sales: | | | | | | | | |
Euro, | | | | | | | | |
Expiring 9/17/2008 | | 4,380,000 | | 6,770,691 | | 6,867,931 | | (97,240) |
The fund may enter into swap agreements to exchange the interest rate on, or return generated by, one nominal instrument for the return generated by another nominal instrument.
The fund accrues for the interim payments on swap contracts in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 133.The fund accrues for the interim payments on swap contracts on a daily basis, with the net amount recorded within unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap contracts in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Once the interim payments are settled in cash, the net amount is recorded as realized gain (loss) on swaps, in addition to realized gain (loss) recorded upon the termination of swaps contracts in the Statement of Operations. Fluctuations in the value of swap contracts are recorded as a component of net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments.
Credit default swaps involve commitments to pay a fixed interest rate in exchange for payment if a credit event affecting a third party (the referenced company) occurs. Credit events may include a failure to pay interest or principal, bankruptcy, or restructuring. For those credit default swaps in which the fund is receiving a fixed rate, the fund is providing credit protection on the underlying instrument.The maximum payouts for these contracts are limited to the notional amount of each swap.At June 30, 2008, the fund had no open credit default swaps.
38
Risks may arise upon entering into these agreements from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of the agreement and are generally limited to the amount of net payments to be received, if any, at the date of default.
At June 30, 2008, accumulated net unrealized depreciation on investments was $12,832,375, consisting of $3,065,438 gross unrealized appreciation and $15,897,813 gross unrealized depreciation.
At June 30, 2008, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
In March 2008, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 161”). FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements.The application of FAS 161 is required for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years.At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FAS 161 and its impact on the financial statements and the accompanying notes has not yet been determined.
NOTE 5—Subsequent Event:
Effective July 1, 2008, BNY Mellon has reorganized and consolidated a number of its banking and trust company subsidiaries. As a result of the reorganization, any services previously provided to the fund by Mellon Bank, N.A. or Mellon Trust of New England, N.A. are now provided by The Bank of New York, which has changed its name to The Bank of New York Mellon.
The Fund 39
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
On July 23-24, 2008, the Board of Trustees approved an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between the fund and Dreyfus Premier High Income Fund, a series of Dreyfus Bond Funds, Inc. the (“Acquired Fund”), providing for the Acquired Fund to merge into the fund as part of a tax-free reorganization.The merger, which is subject to the approval of the Acquired Fund’s shareholders, currently is anticipated to occur on or about January 8, 2009. On its merger date, the Acquired Fund would exchange all of its assets at net asset value, subject to liabilities, for an equivalent value of shares of the fund. Such shares would be distributed pro rata to shareholders of the Acquired Fund so that each shareholder receives a number of shares of the fund equal to the aggregate net asset value of the shareholder’s Acquired Fund’s shares.
40
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND |
APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT |
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) |
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on February 12 and 13, 2008, the Board considered the re-approval of the fund’s Investment Management Agreement (“Management Agreement”), pursuant to which the Manager provides the fund with investment advisory and administrative services.The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of the Manager.
Analysis of Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund. The Board members considered information previously provided to them in a presentation from representatives of the Manager regarding services provided to the fund and other funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and representatives of the Manager confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. The Board also discussed the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the fund pursuant to its Management Agreement.The Manager’s representatives reviewed the fund’s distribution of accounts and the relationships the Manager has with various intermediaries and the different needs of each. The Manager’s representatives noted the distribution channels for the fund as well as the diversity of distribution among the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and the Manager’s corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including those of the fund.The Manager also provided the number of shareholder accounts in the fund, as well as the fund’s asset size.
The Board members also considered the Manager’s research and portfolio management capabilities and that the Manager also provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered the Manager’s extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructure.
The Fund 41
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued ) |
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio. The Board members reviewed the fund’s performance and comparisons to a group of retail front-end load, high current yield funds (the “Performance Group”) and to a larger universe of funds, consisting of all retail and institutional high current yield funds (the “Performance Universe”) selected and provided by Lipper, Inc., an independent provider of investment company data.The Board was provided with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe, as well as the Expense Group and Expense Universe (discussed below). The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s yield performance for the past ten one-year periods ended December 31st (1998-2007) was at or above the Performance Group median (except for the one-year periods ended December 31, 2001 and 2004) and above the Performance Universe median for each period. The Board members noted that the fund’s total return performance was variously above and below the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians for various periods ended December 31, 2007. A representative of the Manager reminded the Board that David Bowser became the fund’s primary portfolio manager in October 2006 and that Karen Bater was added as a co-primary portfolio manager in July 2007, and noted that the fund’s yield performance and the fund’s total return performance for the one-year period ended December 31, 2007 were above the respective Performance Group and Performance Universe medians. The Manager also provided a comparison of the fund’s total returns to the returns of the fund’s benchmark index for each calendar year for the past ten years.
The Board members also discussed the fund’s management fee and expense ratio and reviewed the range of management fees and expense ratios of a comparable group of funds (the “Expense Group”) and a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), each selected and provided by Lipper. Noting that the fund was the only fund in the Expense Group with a “unitary fee structure”, the Board members
42
noted that the fund’s management fee was above the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and its expense ratio was below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
Representatives of the Manager reviewed with the Board members the fees paid to the Manager or its affiliates by mutual funds managed by the Manager or its affiliates with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies, and included in the same Lipper category as the fund (the “Similar Funds”), and by other accounts managed by the Manager or its affiliates with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies as the fund (the “Similar Accounts”). The Manager’s representatives explained the nature of the Similar Accounts and the differences, from the Manager’s perspective, in providing services to such Similar Accounts as compared to managing and providing services to the fund. The Manager’s representatives also reviewed the costs associated with distribution through intermediaries. The Board analyzed differences in fees paid to the Manager and discussed the relationship of the fees paid in light of the services provided, noting the fund’s “unitary fee” structure. The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Funds and Similar Accounts to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee. The Board acknowledged that differences in fees paid by the Similar Funds and Similar Accounts seemed to be consistent with the services provided.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. The Manager’s representatives reviewed the dollar amount of expenses allocated and profit received by the Manager and the method used to determine such expenses and profit. The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding the Manager’s approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus mutual fund com-plex.The Board also was informed that the methodology had also been reviewed by an independent registered public accounting firm which, like the consultant, found the methodology to be reasonable.The con-
The Fund 43
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND ’S |
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued ) |
sulting firm also analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of the fund.The Board members evaluated the profitability analysis in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders.The Board members also considered potential benefits to the Manager from acting as investment adviser and noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements with respect to trading the fund’s portfolio.
It was noted that the Board members should consider the Manager’s profitability with respect to the fund as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Management Agreement bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by the Manager, including the nature, extent and quality of such services and that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been decreasing, the possibility that the Manager may have realized any economies of scale would be less. It also was noted that the profitability percentage for managing the fund was within the range determined by appropriate court cases to be reasonable given the services rendered and generally superior service levels provided by the Manager.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to continuation of the fund’s Management Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board made the following conclusions and determinations.
- The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the ser- vices provided by the Manager are adequate and appropriate.
44
- While the Board was generally satisfied with the fund’s performance, noting the fund’s yield performance and one-, five- and ten-year total return performance, it believed that the Manager was seeking to continue to improve performance and was generally satisfied with the Manager’s effort to do so.The Board noted the change in port- folio manager in October 2006 and the addition of another primary portfolio manager in July 2007.
- The Board concluded that the fee paid by the fund to the Manager was reasonable in light of the services provided, comparative perfor- mance, expense and advisory fee information, costs of the services provided and profits to be realized and benefits derived or to be derived by the Manager from its relationship with the fund.
- The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by the Manager in con- nection with the management fee rate charged to the fund and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year, and, without any one factor being dispositive, the Board determined that re-approval of the fund’s Management Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders and that the Management Agreement would be renewed through April 4, 2009.
The Fund 45
For More Information
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9be2/f9be2ccf39c82c4bf0d21fde5aeb9d127c021fe5" alt=""
Telephone Call your financial representative or 1-800-554-4611
Mail | | The Dreyfus Premier Family of Funds |
| | 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 |
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
A description of the policies and procedures that the fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities, and information regarding how the fund voted these proxies for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2008, is available at http://www.dreyfus.com and on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The description of the policies and procedures is also available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-645-6561.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc0c4/bc0c4fb52015de7ee3b16cb2cac451e6a3ee46aa" alt=""
© 2008 MBSC Securities Corporation
Item 2. | | Code of Ethics. |
| | Not applicable. |
Item 3. | | Audit Committee Financial Expert. |
| | Not applicable. |
Item 4. | | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
| | Not applicable. |
Item 5. | | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. |
| | Not applicable. |
Item 6. | | Investments. |
(a) | | Not applicable. |
Item 7. | | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management |
| | Investment Companies. |
| | Not applicable. |
Item 8. | | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
| | Not applicable. |
Item 9. | | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and |
| | Affiliated Purchasers. |
| | Not applicable. [CLOSED END FUNDS ONLY] |
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The Registrant has a Nominating Committee (the "Committee"), which is responsible for selecting and nominating persons for election or appointment by the Registrant's Board as Board members. The Committee has adopted a Nominating Committee Charter (the "Charter"). Pursuant to the Charter, the Committee will consider recommendations for nominees from shareholders submitted to the Secretary of the Registrant, c/o The Dreyfus Corporation Legal Department, 200 Park Avenue, 8th Floor East, New York, New York 10166. A nomination submission must include information regarding the recommended nominee as specified in the Charter. This information includes all information relating to a recommended nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxy statements for the election of Board members, as well as information sufficient to evaluate the factors to be considered by the Committee, including character and integrity, business and professional experience, and whether the person has the ability to apply sound and independent business judgment and would act in the interests of the Registrant and its shareholders. Nomination submissions are required to be accompanied by a written consent of the individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board and to serve if elected by the shareholders, and such additional information must be provided regarding the recommended nominee as reasonably requested by the Committee.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable.
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust
By: | | /s/J. David Officer |
| | J. David Officer, |
| | President |
|
Date: | | 08/25/08 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: | | /s/J. David Officer |
| | J. David Officer, |
| | President |
|
Date: | | 08/25/08 |
|
By: | | /s/James Windels |
| | James Windels, |
| | Treasurer |
|
Date: | | 08/25/08 |
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT)
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT)