Mattel (MAT) 10-Q 2011 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 001-05647

MATTEL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	95-1567322
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

333 Continental Blvd.

El Segundo, CA 90245-5012

(Address of principal executive offices)

(310) 252-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

NONE

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  x    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨    Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of shares outstanding of registrant’s common stock, $1.00 par value, as of July 14, 2011:

342,890,365 shares

MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

		Page
	PART I
Item 1.	Financial Statements		3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets		3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations		4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		25
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		39
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		40
	PART II
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		41
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		41
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		41
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		41
Item 5.	Other Information		41
Item 6.	Exhibits		42
	Signature		43

2

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			December 31, 2010
	(Unaudited; in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and equivalents	$	418,476		$	544,869		$	1,281,123
Accounts receivable, net		1,012,000			805,076			1,146,106
Inventories		783,533			597,614			463,838
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		317,093			330,444			335,543
Total current assets		2,531,102			2,278,003			3,226,610
Noncurrent Assets
Property, plant, and equipment, net		513,792			486,026			484,705
Goodwill		828,525			817,618			824,007
Other noncurrent assets		924,279			894,078			882,411
Total Assets	$	4,797,698		$	4,475,725		$	5,417,733
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	10,000		$	250,000		$	250,000
Accounts payable		371,862			340,772			406,270
Accrued liabilities		499,190			421,877			642,211
Income taxes payable		17,513			15,088			51,801
Total current liabilities		898,565			1,027,737			1,350,282
Noncurrent Liabilities
Long-term debt		950,000			460,000			950,000
Other noncurrent liabilities		482,248			481,013			488,867
Total noncurrent liabilities		1,432,248			941,013			1,438,867
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock $1.00 par value, 1.0 billion shares authorized; 441.4 million shares issued		441,369			441,369			441,369
Additional paid-in capital		1,686,716			1,694,233			1,706,461
Treasury stock at cost; 97.1 million shares, 81.3 million shares, and 92.3 million shares, respectively		(2,028,757	)		(1,596,532	)		(1,880,692	)
Retained earnings		2,655,469			2,416,084			2,720,645
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(287,912	)		(448,179	)		(359,199	)
Total stockholders’ equity		2,466,885			2,506,975			2,628,584
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	4,797,698		$	4,475,725		$	5,417,733

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
	(Unaudited; in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net Sales	$	1,161,667		$	1,018,503		$	2,113,523		$	1,898,585
Cost of sales		605,426			528,887			1,084,135			977,117
Gross Profit		556,241			489,616			1,029,388			921,468
Advertising and promotion expenses		116,167			101,850			218,016			196,019
Other selling and administrative expenses		330,807			318,330			665,347			610,786
Operating Income		109,267			69,436			146,025			114,663
Interest expense		17,642			13,444			36,458			27,067
Interest (income)		(2,451	)		(2,782	)		(5,614	)		(5,234	)
Other non-operating (income), net		(812	)		(3,303	)		(968	)		(2,529	)
Income Before Income Taxes		94,888			62,077			116,149			95,359
Provision for income taxes		14,359			10,502			19,013			18,942
Net Income	$	80,529		$	51,575		$	97,136		$	76,417
Net Income Per Common Share—Basic	$	0.23		$	0.14		$	0.27		$	0.21
Weighted average number of common shares		347,133			362,819			348,094			363,065
Net Income Per Common Share—Diluted	$	0.23		$	0.14		$	0.27		$	0.21
Weighted average number of common and potential common shares		350,944			365,851			351,744			366,144
Dividends Declared Per Common Share	$	0.23		$	—		$	0.46		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
	(Unaudited; in thousands)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income	$	97,136		$	76,417
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows used for operating activities:
Depreciation		71,918			74,747
Amortization		7,337			7,783
Deferred income taxes		(38,752	)		(9,326	)
Share-based compensation		19,870			25,410
Increase (decrease) from changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		158,941			(86,602	)
Inventories		(298,794	)		(266,763	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		29,118			22,154
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and income taxes payable		(206,022	)		(255,933	)
Other, net		(67,530	)		40,031
Net cash flows used for operating activities		(226,778	)		(372,082	)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchases of tools, dies, and molds		(54,830	)		(39,612	)
Purchases of other property, plant, and equipment		(47,588	)		(17,932	)
Proceeds from sale of other property, plant, and equipment		489			645
Proceeds from (payments for) foreign currency forward exchange contracts		57,576			(40,411	)
Net cash flows used for investing activities		(44,353	)		(97,310	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Payments of short-term borrowings		—			(1,950	)
Payment of credit facility renewal costs		(6,917	)		—
Payment of long-term borrowings		(240,000	)		(40,000	)
Share repurchases		(251,865	)		(111,199	)
Payment of dividends on common stock		(159,906	)		—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		67,400			44,291
Other, net		(9,465	)		9,712
Net cash flows used for financing activities		(600,753	)		(99,146	)
Effect of Currency Exchange Rate Changes on Cash		9,237			(3,590	)
Decrease in Cash and Equivalents		(862,647	)		(572,128	)
Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of Period		1,281,123			1,116,997
Cash and Equivalents at End of Period	$	418,476		$	544,869

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.     Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of only those of a normal recurring nature, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and interim results of Mattel, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Mattel” or the “Company”) as of and for the periods presented, have been included. Because Mattel’s business is seasonal, results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those that may be expected for a full year.

The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, however, the accompanying interim notes to the consolidated financial statements do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

The financial information included herein should be read in conjunction with Mattel’s consolidated financial statements and related notes in its 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2.     Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $20.5 million, $19.7 million, and $21.8 million as of June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2010, respectively.

3.     Inventories

Inventories include the following:

	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Raw materials and work in process	$	121,760	$	95,761	$	68,095
Finished goods		661,773		501,853		395,743
	$	783,533	$	597,614	$	463,838

4.     Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment, net includes the following:

	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Land	$	26,767		$	26,706		$	26,796
Buildings		259,877			244,544			249,542
Machinery and equipment		836,527			780,367			809,723
Tools, dies, and molds		618,579			590,089			589,156
Capital leases		23,271			23,271			23,271
Leasehold improvements		192,820			180,503			177,141
		1,957,841			1,845,480			1,875,629
Less: accumulated depreciation		(1,444,049	)		(1,359,454	)		(1,390,924	)
	$	513,792		$	486,026		$	484,705

6

5.     Goodwill

Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, which are either at the operating segment level or one reporting level below the operating segment level, for purposes of evaluating whether goodwill is impaired. Mattel’s reporting units are: Mattel Girls Brands US, Mattel Boys Brands US, Fisher-Price Brands US, American Girl Brands, and International. Mattel tests its goodwill for impairment annually in the third quarter, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may exceed its fair value.

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting unit for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is shown below. Brand-specific goodwill held by foreign subsidiaries is allocated to the US reporting units selling those brands, thereby causing foreign currency translation impact for the US reporting units.

	December 31, 2010		Impact of Currency Exchange Rate Changes		June 30, 2011
	(In thousands)
Mattel Girls Brands US	$	31,071	$	799	$	31,870
Mattel Boys Brands US		130,658		63		130,721
Fisher-Price Brands US		215,879		157		216,036
American Girl Brands		207,571		—		207,571
International		238,828		3,499		242,327
	$	824,007	$	4,518	$	828,525

6.     Other Noncurrent Assets

Other noncurrent assets include the following:

	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Deferred income taxes	$	512,566	$	490,597	$	477,320
Nonamortizable identifiable intangibles		122,223		122,223		122,223
Identifiable intangibles (net of amortization of $51.2 million, $74.6 million, and $64.2 million, respectively)		86,811		88,446		91,359
Other		202,679		192,812		191,509
	$	924,279	$	894,078	$	882,411

7.     Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities include the following:

	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Royalties	$	71,160	$	59,359	$	95,785
Advertising and promotion		38,463		31,162		59,586
Derivatives payable		30,770		13,020		11,082
Taxes other than income taxes		28,409		37,454		68,686
Other		330,388		280,882		407,072
	$	499,190	$	421,877	$	642,211

7

8.     Product Recalls

During 2007, Mattel recalled products with high-powered magnets that may become dislodged and other products, some of which were produced using non-approved paint containing lead in excess of applicable regulatory and Mattel standards. During the second half of 2007, additional products were recalled, withdrawn from retail stores, or replaced at the request of consumers as a result of safety or quality issues (collectively, the “2007 Product Recalls”).

Following the announcement of the 2007 Product Recalls, a number of lawsuits were filed against Mattel with respect to the recalled products, which are more fully described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Mattel’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, Mattel reduced its estimate of these settlement costs, which had the effect of reducing other selling and administrative expenses by $1.2 million and $8.7 million, respectively, primarily based on actual experience under the settlement program. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, there were no changes to Mattel’s 2007 Product Recalls reserve estimates.

Although management is not aware of any additional quality or safety issues that are likely to result in material recalls or withdrawals, there can be no assurance that issues will not be identified in the future.

9.     Seasonal Financing

Mattel maintains and periodically amends or replaces its domestic unsecured committed revolving credit facility with a commercial bank group that is used as a back-up facility to Mattel’s commercial paper program, which is used as the primary source of financing for the seasonal working capital requirements of its domestic subsidiaries. The revolving credit facility was amended and restated on March 8, 2011 to, among other things, (i) extend the maturity date of the credit facility to March 8, 2015, (ii) increase aggregate commitments under the credit facility to $1.4 billion, with an “accordion feature,” which allows Mattel to increase the aggregate availability under the credit facility to $1.6 billion under certain circumstances, (iii) decrease the applicable interest rate margins to a range of 0.25% to 1.50% above the applicable base rate for base rate loans, and 1.25% to 2.50% above the applicable London Interbank Borrowing Rate for Eurodollar rate loans, in each case depending on Mattel’s senior unsecured long-term debt rating, and (iv) decrease commitment fees to a range of 0.15% to 0.40% of the unused commitments under the credit facility.

The borrowing capacity of the amended facility is $1.4 billion for four years, which exceeds the $1.1 billion for one year remaining on the facility prior to the amendment. The proportion of unamortized debt issuance costs from the prior facility renewal related to creditors involved in both the prior facility and amended facility, and borrowing costs incurred as a result of the amendment were deferred and will be amortized over the term of the amended facility.

In connection with the execution of the amendment of the domestic unsecured revolving credit facility, Mattel terminated its $300.0 million domestic receivables sales facility, which was a sub-facility of the domestic unsecured committed revolving credit facility.

Mattel is required to meet financial covenants at the end of each quarter and fiscal year, using the formulae specified in the credit facility agreement to calculate the ratios. Mattel was in compliance with such covenants at the end of the six months ended June 30, 2011.

8

10.   Long-term Debt

Long-term debt includes the following:

	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Medium-term notes due October 2011 to November 2013	$	110,000		$	160,000		$	150,000
2006 Senior Notes		—			200,000			200,000
2008 Senior Notes due March 2013		350,000			350,000			350,000
2010 Senior Notes due October 2020 and October 2040		500,000			—			500,000
		960,000			710,000			1,200,000
Less: current portion		(10,000	)		(250,000	)		(250,000	)
Total long-term debt	$	950,000		$	460,000		$	950,000

In September 2010, Mattel issued $250.0 million of unsecured 4.35% senior notes (“4.35% Senior Notes”) due October 1, 2020 and $250.0 million of unsecured 6.20% senior notes (“6.20% Senior Notes”) due October 1, 2040 (collectively, “2010 Senior Notes”). Interest on the 2010 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually April 1 and October 1 of each year. Mattel may redeem all or part of the 2010 Senior Notes at any time or from time to time at its option at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and (ii) a “make-whole” amount based on the yield of a comparable US Treasury security plus 25 basis points in respect of the 4.35% Senior Notes and 40 basis points in respect of the 6.20% Senior Notes.

In June 2011, Mattel repaid the remaining $200.0 million of its 2006 Senior Notes in connection with its scheduled maturities. In June 2011 and October 2010, Mattel repaid $40.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively, of its Medium-term notes in connection with their scheduled maturities.

11.   Other Noncurrent Liabilities

Other noncurrent liabilities include the following:

	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Benefit plan liabilities	$	224,346	$	248,262	$	257,195
Noncurrent tax liabilities		113,351		108,237		113,526
Other		144,551		124,514		118,146
	$	482,248	$	481,013	$	488,867

9

12.   Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Net income	$	80,529		$	51,575		$	97,136		$	76,417
Currency translation adjustments		35,236			(77,566	)		88,414			(106,642	)
Defined benefit pension plans net prior service cost and net actuarial loss		2,533			2,244			5,066			4,585
Net unrealized (losses) gains on derivative instruments:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains		(8,604	)		15,999			(22,957	)		27,738
Reclassification adjustment for realized losses included in net income		1,504			2,916			764			5,674
		(7,100	)		18,915			(22,193	)		33,412
	$	111,198		$	(4,832	)	$	168,423		$	7,772

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:

	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Currency translation adjustments	$	(133,344	)	$	(329,283	)	$	(221,758	)
Defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans, net of tax		(129,248	)		(137,432	)		(134,314	)
Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments, net of tax		(25,320	)		18,536			(3,127	)
	$	(287,912	)	$	(448,179	)	$	(359,199	)

Currency Translation Adjustments

Mattel’s reporting currency is the US dollar. The translation of its net investment in subsidiaries with non-US dollar functional currencies subjects Mattel to currency exchange rate fluctuations in its results of operations and financial position. Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries with non-US dollar functional currencies are translated into US dollars at fiscal period-end exchange rates. Income, expense, and cash flow items are translated at weighted average exchange rates prevailing during the fiscal period. The resulting currency translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders’ equity. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, currency translation adjustments resulted in a net gain of $88.4 million, with gains primarily from the strengthening of the Euro, Brazilian real, Mexican peso, and British pound sterling against the US dollar. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, currency translation adjustments resulted in a net loss of $106.6 million, with losses primarily from the weakening of the Euro, British pound sterling, Brazilian real, and Chilean peso against the US dollar, partially offset from the strengthening of the Mexican peso against the US dollar.

13.   Derivative Instruments

Mattel seeks to mitigate its exposure to foreign currency transaction risk by monitoring its foreign currency transaction exposure for the year and partially hedging such exposure using foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Mattel uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts as cash flow hedges primarily to hedge its purchases and sales of inventory denominated in foreign currencies. These contracts generally have maturity dates up to 18 months. These derivative instruments have been designated as effective cash flow hedges, whereby the unsettled hedges are reported in Mattel’s consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with changes in

10

the fair value of the hedges reflected in other comprehensive income (“OCI”). Realized gains and losses for these contracts are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the inventory is sold to customers. Additionally, Mattel uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge intercompany loans and advances denominated in foreign currencies. Due to the short-term nature of the contracts involved, Mattel does not use hedge accounting for these contracts, and as such, changes in fair value are recorded in the period of change in the consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2010, Mattel held foreign currency forward exchange contracts with notional amounts of approximately $1.4 billion, $1.1 billion, and $1.1 billion, respectively.

The following table presents Mattel’s derivative assets and liabilities:

	Asset Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Classification		Fair Value
			June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		December 31, 2010
					(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	7,833	$	30,802	$	8,200
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts		Other noncurrent assets		1,101		911		579
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments			$	8,934	$	31,713	$	8,779
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	6,529	$	—	$	8,799
Total			$	15,463	$	31,713	$	17,578
	Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Classification		Fair Value
			June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		December 31, 2010
					(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts		Accrued liabilities	$	30,770	$	5,132	$	11,082
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts		Other noncurrent liabilities		1,209		27		101
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments			$	31,979	$	5,159	$	11,183
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts		Accrued liabilities	$	—	$	7,888	$	—
Total			$	31,979	$	13,047	$	11,183

11

The following tables present the classification and amount of gains and losses, net of tax, from derivatives reported in the consolidated statements of operations:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011						For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010					Statements of Operations Classification
	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI			Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI to Statements of Operations			Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI		Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI to Statements of Operations
	(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts	$	(8,604	)	$	(1,504	)	$	15,999	$	(2,916	)		Cost of sales

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011						For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010					Statements of Operations Classification
	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI			Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI to Statements of Operations			Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI		Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI to Statements of Operations
	(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts	$	(22,957	)	$	(764	)	$	27,738	$	(5,674	)		Cost of sales

The net loss of $1.5 million and $0.8 million reclassified from accumulated OCI to the statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and the net loss of $2.9 million and $5.7 million reclassified from accumulated OCI to the statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, are offset by the changes in cash flows associated with the underlying hedged transactions.

	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in the Statements of Operations					Statements of Operations Classification
	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011		For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts	$	23,388	$	(40,072	)	Non-operating income/expense
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts		1,036		316		Cost of sales
Total	$	24,424	$	(39,756	)

12

	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in the Statements of Operations					Statements of Operations Classification
	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011		For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts	$	52,570	$	(52,469	)	Non-operating income/expense
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts		2,736		1,948		Cost of sales
Total	$	55,306	$	(50,521	)

The net gain of $24.4 million and $55.3 million recognized in the statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and the net loss of $39.8 million and $50.5 million recognized in the statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, are offset by foreign currency transaction gains and losses on the related hedged balances.

14.   Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents information about Mattel’s assets and liabilities measured and reported in the financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

• Level 1 – Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.

• Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

• Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable, supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Mattel’s financial assets and liabilities include the following:

	June 30, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (a)	$	—	$	15,463	$	—	$	15,463
Auction rate securities (b)		—		—		21,000		21,000
Total assets	$	—	$	15,463	$	21,000	$	36,463
Liabilities:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (a)	$	—	$	31,979	$	—	$	31,979
	June 30, 2010
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (a)	$	—	$	31,713	$	—	$	31,713
Liabilities:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (a)	$	—	$	13,047	$	—	$	13,047

13

	December 31, 2010
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (a)	$	—	$	17,578	$	—	$	17,578
Auction rate securities (b)		—		—		21,000		21,000
Total assets	$	—	$	17,578	$	21,000	$	38,578
Liabilities:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (a)	$	—	$	11,183	$	—	$	11,183

(a) The fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts is based on dealer quotes of market forward rates and reflects the amount that Mattel would receive or pay at their maturity dates for contracts involving the same notional amounts, currencies, and maturity dates.

(b) The fair value of the auction rate securities is estimated using a discounted cash flow model based on (i) estimated interest rates, timing, and amount of cash flows, (ii) credit spreads, recovery rates, and credit quality of the underlying securities, and (iii) illiquidity considerations.

During 2010, Mattel adopted Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2010-11,Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives, and elected the fair value option under this standard, which resulted in an $8.7 million, net of tax, adjustment to beginning retained earnings relating to auction rate securities that contain embedded credit derivatives, that were previously reported at amortized cost.

The following table presents information about Mattel’s assets measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis using significant Level 3 inputs:

	Level 3
	(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	21,000
Unrealized change in fair value		—
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	21,000

15.   Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Mattel’s financial instruments include cash and equivalents, accounts receivable and payable, and accrued liabilities. The carrying amount of these instruments approximates fair value because of their short-term nature.

The estimated fair value of Mattel’s long-term debt, including the current portion, was $997.3 million (compared to a carrying amount of $960.0 million) as of June 30, 2011, $753.8 million (compared to a carrying amount of $710.0 million) as of June 30, 2010, and $1.23 billion (compared to a carrying amount of $1.20 billion) as of December 31, 2010. The estimated fair values have been calculated based on broker quotes or rates for the same or similar instruments.

The fair value related disclosures for Mattel’s derivative financial instruments are included in Note 13, “Derivative Instruments”, and Note 14, “Fair Value Measurements”. The fair value related disclosures for Mattel’s other investments are included in Note 14, “Fair Value Measurements”.

16.   Earnings Per Share

Unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Certain of Mattel’s restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are considered participating securities because they contain nonforfeitable rights to dividend equivalents.

14

Under the two-class method, net income is reduced by the amount of dividends declared in the period for each class of common stock and participating securities. The remaining undistributed earnings are then allocated to common stock and participating securities as if all of the net income for the period had been distributed. Basic earnings per common share excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing net income allocable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income allocable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares for the period, as adjusted for the potential dilutive effect of non-participating share-based awards. The following table reconciles earnings per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Basic:
Net income	$	80,529		$	51,575		$	97,136		$	76,417
Less net income allocable to participating RSUs (a)		(1,190	)		(602	)		(1,419	)		(900	)
Net income available for basic common shares	$	79,339		$	50,973		$	95,717		$	75,517
Weighted average common shares outstanding		347,133			362,819			348,094			363,065
Basic net income per common share	$	0.23		$	0.14		$	0.27		$	0.21
Diluted:
Net income	$	80,529		$	51,575		$	97,136		$	76,417
Less net income allocable to participating RSUs (a)		(1,190	)		(597	)		(1,427	)		(892	)
Net income available for diluted common shares	$	79,339		$	50,978		$	95,709		$	75,525
Weighted average common shares outstanding		347,133			362,819			348,094			363,065
Weighted average common equivalent shares arising from:
Dilutive stock options and non-participating RSUs		3,811			3,032			3,650			3,079
Weighted average number of common and potential common shares		350,944			365,851			351,744			366,144
Diluted net income per common share	$	0.23		$	0.14		$	0.27		$	0.21

(a) During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Mattel allocated a proportionate share of both dividends and undistributed earnings to participating RSUs.

The calculation of potential common shares assumes the exercise of dilutive stock options and vesting of non-participating RSUs, net of assumed treasury share repurchases at average market prices. Nonqualified stock options and non-participating RSUs totaling 0.1 million and 1.7 million shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, because they were antidilutive. Nonqualified stock options and non-participating RSUs totaling 0.1 million and 1.8 million shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, because they were antidilutive.

17.   Employee Benefit Plans

Mattel and certain of its subsidiaries have qualified and nonqualified retirement plans covering substantially all employees of these companies, which are more fully described in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in its 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

15

A summary of the components of net periodic benefit cost for Mattel’s defined benefit pension plans is as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Service cost	$	2,992		$	2,715		$	6,205		$	6,032
Interest cost		7,324			7,862			14,653			16,017
Expected return on plan assets		(6,300	)		(7,213	)		(12,602	)		(14,452	)
Amortization of prior service cost		496			439			957			877
Recognized actuarial loss		3,632			4,254			7,268			7,922
	$	8,144		$	8,057		$	16,481		$	16,396

A summary of the components of net periodic benefit cost for Mattel’s postretirement benefit plans is as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Service cost	$	20	$	22	$	40	$	44
Interest cost		438		627		875		1,254
Recognized actuarial loss		35		149		71		298
	$	493	$	798	$	986	$	1,596

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Mattel made cash contributions totaling approximately $32 million and $2 million to its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans, respectively.

18.   Share-Based Payments

Mattel has various stock compensation plans, which are more fully described in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in its 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In May 2010, Mattel’s stockholders approved the Mattel, Inc. 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan (“the 2010 Plan”). Upon approval of the 2010 Plan, Mattel terminated the Mattel, Inc. 2005 Equity Compensation Plan (“the 2005 Plan”), except with regard to grants then outstanding under the 2005 Plan. All equity compensation grants are now being made under the 2010 Plan. Under the 2010 Plan, Mattel has the ability to grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, performance awards, dividend equivalent rights, and shares of common stock to officers, employees, and other persons providing services to Mattel. Stock options are granted with exercise prices at the fair market value of Mattel’s common stock on the applicable grant date and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant. Both stock options and time-vesting RSUs generally provide for vesting over a period of three years from the date of grant.

Compensation expense, included within other selling and administrative expenses, related to stock options and RSUs is as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Stock option compensation expense	$	2,118	$	1,887	$	5,207	$	4,571
RSU compensation expense		6,780		10,694		14,663		20,839
	$	8,898	$	12,581	$	19,870	$	25,410

16

As of June 30, 2011, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based payments totaled $54.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.

Mattel uses treasury shares purchased under its share repurchase program to satisfy stock option exercises and the vesting of RSUs. Cash received for stock option exercises for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $67.4 million and $44.3 million, respectively.

19.   Other Selling and Administrative Expenses

Other selling and administrative expenses include the following:

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Design and development	$	45,105	$	42,917	$	88,251	$	84,312
Identifiable intangible asset amortization		2,383		2,549		4,550		5,101

20.   Foreign Currency Transaction Gains and Losses

Currency exchange rate fluctuations may impact Mattel’s results of operations and cash flows. Mattel’s currency transaction exposures include gains and losses realized on unhedged inventory purchases and unhedged receivables and payables balances that are denominated in a currency other than the applicable functional currency. Gains and losses on unhedged inventory purchases and other transactions associated with operating activities are recorded in the components of operating income to which they relate in the consolidated statements of operations. For hedges of intercompany loans and advances, which do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, the gains or losses on the hedges resulting from changes in fair value as well as the offsetting transaction gains or losses on the related hedged items, along with unhedged items, are recognized in non-operating income, net in the consolidated statements of operations. Inventory purchase and sale transactions denominated in the Euro, British pound sterling, and Mexican peso are the primary transactions that cause foreign currency transaction exposure for Mattel.

Currency transaction gains included in the consolidated statements of operations are as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Operating income	$	7,504	$	6,369	$	19,059	$	16,234
Other non-operating income, net		337		3,502		362		1,470
Net transaction gains	$	7,841	$	9,871	$	19,421	$	17,704

21.   Income Taxes

Mattel’s provision for income taxes was $19.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $18.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Mattel recognized discrete tax benefits of $6.4 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of current audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions, settlements, and enacted tax law changes. Mattel recognized discrete tax benefits of $4.6 million and $4.3 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions, settlements, and enacted tax law changes.

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, Mattel reached a resolution with the Internal Revenue Service regarding all open issues relating to the examination of Mattel’s US federal income tax returns for the years 2006 and 2007. The resolution did not have a material impact on Mattel’s consolidated financial statement for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

17

22.   Contingencies

With regards to the claims against Mattel described below, Mattel intends to defend itself vigorously. Except as more fully described below, management cannot reasonably determine the scope or amount of possible liabilities that could result from an unfavorable settlement or resolution of these claims. However, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of these claims could have a material adverse effect on Mattel’s financial condition and results of operations, and there can be no assurance that Mattel will be able to achieve a favorable settlement or resolution of these claims.

Litigation Related to Carter Bryant and MGA Entertainment, Inc.

In April 2004, Mattel filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Carter Bryant (“Bryant”), a former Mattel design employee. The suit alleges that Bryant aided and assisted a Mattel competitor, MGA Entertainment, Inc. (“MGA”), during the time he was employed by Mattel, in violation of his contractual and other duties to Mattel. In September 2004, Bryant asserted counterclaims against Mattel, including counterclaims in which Bryant sought, as a putative class action representative, to invalidate Mattel’s Confidential Information and Proprietary Inventions Agreements with its employees. Bryant also removed Mattel’s suit to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In December 2004, MGA intervened as a party-defendant in Mattel’s action against Bryant, asserting that its rights to Bratz properties are at stake in the litigation.

Separately, in November 2004, Bryant filed an action against Mattel in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The action sought a judicial declaration that Bryant’s purported conveyance of rights in Bratz was proper and that he did not misappropriate Mattel property in creating Bratz.

In April 2005, MGA filed suit against Mattel in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. MGA’s action alleges claims of trade dress infringement, trade dress dilution, false designation of origin, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment. The suit alleges, among other things, that certain products, themes, packaging, and/or television commercials in various Mattel product lines have infringed upon products, themes, packaging, and/or television commercials for various MGA product lines, including Bratz. The complaint also asserts that various alleged Mattel acts with respect to unidentified retailers, distributors, and licensees have damaged MGA and that various alleged acts by industry organizations, purportedly induced by Mattel, have damaged MGA. MGA’s suit alleges that MGA has been damaged in an amount “believed to reach or exceed tens of millions of dollars” and further seeks punitive damages, disgorgement of Mattel’s profits and injunctive relief.

In June 2006, the three cases were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On July 17, 2006, the Court issued an order dismissing all claims that Bryant had asserted against Mattel, including Bryant’s purported counterclaims to invalidate Mattel’s Confidential Information and Proprietary Inventions Agreements with its employees, and Bryant’s claims for declaratory relief.

In November 2006, Mattel asked the Court for leave to file an Amended Complaint that included not only additional claims against Bryant, but also included claims for copyright infringement, RICO violations, misappropriation of trade secrets, intentional interference with contract, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and breach of duty of loyalty, and unfair competition, among others, against MGA, its CEO Isaac Larian, certain MGA affiliates and an MGA employee. The RICO claim alleged that MGA stole Bratz and then, by recruiting and hiring key Mattel employees and directing them to bring with them Mattel confidential and proprietary information, unfairly competed against Mattel using Mattel’s trade secrets, confidential information, and key employees to build their business. On January 12, 2007, the Court granted Mattel leave to file these claims as counterclaims in the consolidated cases, which Mattel did that same day.

Mattel sought to try all of its claims in a single trial, but in February 2007, the Court decided that the consolidated cases would be tried in two phases, with the first trial to determine claims and defenses related to Mattel’s ownership of Bratz works and whether MGA infringed those works. On May 19, 2008, Bryant reached a

18

settlement agreement with Mattel and is no longer a defendant in the litigation. In the public stipulation entered by Mattel and Bryant in connection with the resolution, Bryant agreed that he was and would continue to be bound by all prior and future Court Orders relating to Bratz ownership and infringement, including the Court’s summary judgment rulings.

The first phase of the first trial, which began on May 27, 2008, resulted in a unanimous jury verdict on July 17, 2008 in favor of Mattel. The jury found that almost all of the Bratz design drawings and other works in question were created by Bryant while he was employed at Mattel; that MGA and Isaac Larian intentionally interfered with the contractual duties owed by Bryant to Mattel, aided and abetted Bryant’s breaches of his duty of loyalty to Mattel, aided and abetted Bryant’s breaches of the fiduciary duties he owed to Mattel, and converted Mattel property for their own use. The same jury determined that defendants MGA, Larian, and MGA Entertainment (HK) Limited infringed Mattel’s copyrights in the Bratz design drawings and other Bratz works, and awarded Mattel total damages of approximately $100 million against the defendants. On December 3, 2008, the Court issued a series of orders rejecting MGA’s equitable defenses and granting Mattel’s motions for equitable relief, including an order enjoining the MGA party defendants from manufacturing, marketing, or selling certain Bratz fashion dolls or from using the “Bratz” name. The Court stayed the effect of the December 3, 2008 injunctive orders until further order of the Court and entered a further specified stay of the injunctive orders on January 7, 2009.

The parties filed and argued additional motions for post-trial relief, including a request by MGA to enter judgment as a matter of law on Mattel’s claims in MGA’s favor and to reduce the jury’s damages award to Mattel. Mattel additionally moved for the appointment of a receiver. On April 27, 2009, the Court entered an order confirming that Bratz works found by the jury to have been created by Bryant during his Mattel employment were Mattel’s property and that hundreds of Bratz female fashion dolls infringe Mattel’s copyrights. The Court also upheld the jury’s award of damages in the amount of $100 million and ordered an accounting of post-trial Bratz sales. The Court further vacated the stay of the December 3, 2008 orders, except to the extent specified by the Court’s January 7, 2009 modification.

MGA appealed the Court’s equitable orders to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On December 9, 2009, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument on MGA’s appeal and issued an order staying the District Court’s equitable orders pending a further order to be issued by the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit opinion vacating the relief ordered by the District Court was issued on July 22, 2010. The Ninth Circuit stated that, because of several jury instruction errors it identified, a significant portion—if not all—of the jury verdict and damage award should be vacated.

In its opinion, the Ninth Circuit found that the District Court erred in concluding that Mattel’s Invention agreement unambiguously applied to “ideas;” that it should have considered extrinsic evidence in determining the application of the agreement; and if the conclusion turns on conflicting evidence, it should have been up to the jury to decide. The Ninth Circuit also concluded that the District Judge erred in transferring the entire brand to Mattel based on misappropriated names and that the Court should have submitted to the jury, rather than deciding itself, whether Bryant’s agreement assigned works created outside the scope of his employment and whether Bryant’s creation of the Bratz designs and sculpt was outside of his employment. The Court then went on to address copyright issues which would be raised after a retrial, since Mattel “might well convince a properly instructed jury” that it owns Bryant’s designs and sculpt. The Ninth Circuit stated that the sculpt itself was entitled only to “thin” copyright protection against virtually identical works, while the Bratz sketches were entitled to “broad” protection against substantially similar works; in applying the broad protection, however, the Ninth Circuit found that the lower court had erred in failing to filter out all of the unprotectable elements of Bryant’s sketches. This mistake, the Court said, caused the lower court to conclude that all Bratz dolls were substantially similar to Bryant’s original sketches.

Judge Stephen Larson, who presided over the first trial, retired from the bench during the course of the appeal, and the case was transferred to Judge David O. Carter. After the transfer, Judge Carter granted Mattel leave to file a Fourth Amended Answer and Counterclaims which focused on RICO, trade secret and other

19

claims, and added additional parties, and subsequently granted in part and denied in part a defense motion to dismiss those counterclaims. Later, on August 16, 2010, MGA asserted several new claims against Mattel in response to Mattel’s Fourth Amended Answer and Counterclaims, including claims for alleged trade secret misappropriation, an alleged violation of RICO, and wrongful injunction. Mattel moved to strike and/or dismiss these claims, as well as certain MGA allegations regarding Mattel’s motives for filing suit. The Court granted that motion as to the wrongful injunction claim, which it dismissed with prejudice, and as to the allegations about Mattel’s motives, which it struck. The Court denied the motion as to MGA’s trade secret misappropriation claim and its claim for violations of RICO.

The Court resolved summary judgment motions in late 2010. Among other rulings, the Court dismissed both parties’ RICO claims; dismissed Mattel’s claim for breach of fiduciary duty and portions of other claims as “preempted” by the trade secrets act; dismissed MGA’s trade dress infringement claims; dismissed MGA’s unjust enrichment claim; dismissed MGA’s common law unfair competition claim; and dismissed portions of Mattel’s copyright infringement claim as to “later generation” Bratz dolls.

Trial of all remaining claims began in early January 2011. During the trial, and before the case was submitted to the jury, the Court granted MGA’s motions for judgment as to Mattel’s claims for aiding and abetting breach of duty of loyalty and conversion. The Court also granted a defense motion for judgment on portions of Mattel’s claim for misappropriation of trade secrets relating to thefts by former Mattel employees located in Mexico.

The jury reached verdicts on the remaining claims in April 2011. In those verdicts, the jury ruled against Mattel on its claims for ownership of Bratz-related works, for copyright infringement, and for misappropriation of trade secrets. The jury ruled for MGA on its claim of trade secret misappropriation as to 26 of its claimed trade secrets and awarded $88.5 million in damages. The jury ruled against MGA as to 88 of its claimed trade secrets. The jury found that Mattel’s misappropriation was willful and malicious. The Court will determine whether an award of exemplary damages is appropriate, which may not exceed twice the $88.5 million award of compensatory damages. Additionally, attorney’s fees and costs may be awarded. MGA has sought approximately $172.8 million in attorney’s fees and costs; the amount, if any, that the Court will award cannot be determined at this time.

Mattel does not believe that it is probable that any of the damages awarded to MGA will be sustained based on the evidence presented at trial and, accordingly, a liability has not been accrued for this matter. Judgment has not yet been entered, post-trial motions have not yet been ruled upon, and appeals have not yet been filed. Mattel has filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law on MGA’s claim for misappropriation of trade secrets, which is pending.

The Court will rule separately on the parties’ claims for unfair competition under California Business & Professions Code Section 17200. In February 2011, MGA commenced litigation in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging that Mattel’s conduct in response to MGA’s sale of Bratz violated both the federal antitrust statute and the California Business & Professions Code, and constituted abuse of process under California law. Mattel believes these claims are without merit. Mattel has moved to dismiss these claims and intends to vigorously defend against them.

Litigation Related to Gunther-Wahl Productions, Inc.

In April 1998, Mattel was sued in the Los Angeles County Superior Court by Gunther-Wahl Productions, Inc. (“Gunther-Wahl”), a producer of animated television shows, and Candy Wahl, the wife of the principal of Gunther-Wahl (“Gunther-Wahl I”). The lawsuit alleges that Mattel breached an implied contract with Gunther-Wahl arising from a pitch of an animated television show, in that Mattel allegedly used plaintiffs’ ideas without compensating plaintiffs for the use of the ideas. Mattel denies that it used any of plaintiffs’ ideas in any Mattel product. A jury trial was held in early 2000, which resulted in a judgment in favor of Mattel on every claim. On

20

December 5, 2002, the California Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in favor of Mattel, and remanded the matter for a new trial. During the pendency of the Gunther-Wahl I appeal, plaintiffs filed an additional lawsuit against Mattel alleging Mattel further breached the implied contract by using plaintiffs’ ideas in products released subsequent to the trial without compensating plaintiffs (“Gunther-Wahl II”). Between September 2004 and March 2008 and between December 2008 and March 2010, both Gunther-Wahl I and II were stayed as a result of a bankruptcy proceeding filed by one of the principals of Gunther-Wahl. In November 2008, while the stay was lifted, Mattel filed potentially case dispositive motions in both lawsuits. In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Court denied Mattel’s motions. During that quarter, plaintiffs also expanded the list of Mattel products which they contend wrongfully use their ideas and form the basis for their alleged damages. Plaintiffs are seeking royalty-based damages on Mattel’s entire Fairytopia line of products, as well as numerous other products. Trial was originally scheduled to begin in the first quarter of 2011, but in March 2011, the lawsuits were assigned to a new judge for purposes of trial. While awaiting the start of trial, the parties reached an agreement to settle that includes a payment from Mattel to plaintiffs in the amount of $7.5 million, which was accrued as a contingent loss reserve at March 31, 2011 and continues to be accrued at June 30, 2011. The settlement has been approved by the bankruptcy court and is final. Mattel must make the settlement payment in July 2011 and the actions will be dismissed with prejudice in the third quarter of 2011.

23.   Segment Information

Description of Segments

Mattel’s operating segments are separately managed business units and are divided on a geographic basis between domestic and international. Mattel’s domestic operating segments include:

Mattel Girls & Boys Brands—including Barbie^® fashion dolls and accessories (“Barbie^®”), Polly Pocket^®, Little Mommy^®, Disney Classics^®, and Monster High^® (collectively “Other Girls Brands”), Hot Wheels^®, Matchbox^®, Battle Force 5^®, and Tyco R/C^® vehicles and play sets (collectively “Wheels”), and CARS^®, Radica^®, Toy Story^®, Max Steel^®, WWE^® Wrestling, and Batman^® products, and games and puzzles (collectively “Entertainment”).

Fisher-Price Brands—including Fisher-Price^®, Little People^®, BabyGear™, and View-Master^® (collectively “Core Fisher-Price^®”), Dora the Explorer^®, Go Diego Go!^®, Thomas and Friends^®, Sing-a-ma-jigs™, and See ‘N Say^® (collectively “Fisher-Price^® Friends”), and Power Wheels^®.

American Girl Brands—including My American Girl^®, the historical collection, and Bitty Baby^®. American Girl Brands products are sold directly to consumers via its catalogue, website, and proprietary retail stores. Its children’s publications are also sold to certain retailers.

Additionally, the International segment sells products in all toy categories, except American Girl Brands.

21

Segment Data

The following tables present information about revenues, income, and assets by segment. Mattel does not include sales adjustments such as trade discounts and other allowances in the calculation of segment revenues (referred to as “gross sales”). Mattel records these adjustments in its financial accounting systems at the time of sale to each customer, but the adjustments are not allocated to individual products. For this reason, Mattel’s chief operating decision maker uses gross sales by segment as one of the metrics to measure segment performance. Such sales adjustments are included in the determination of segment income based on the adjustments recorded in the financial accounting systems. Segment income represents each segment’s operating income. The corporate and other category includes costs not allocated to individual segments, including charges related to incentive compensation, share-based payments, and corporate headquarters functions managed on a worldwide basis, and the impact of changes in foreign currency rates on intercompany transactions.

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Revenues
Domestic:
Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US	$	323,062		$	289,733		$	626,827		$	549,039
Fisher-Price Brands US		224,129			223,853			396,788			407,102
American Girl Brands		66,438			58,880			139,392			129,086
Total Domestic		613,629			572,466			1,163,007			1,085,227
International		650,527			529,579			1,142,258			977,092
Gross sales		1,264,156			1,102,045			2,305,265			2,062,319
Sales adjustments		(102,489	)		(83,542	)		(191,742	)		(163,734	)
Net sales	$	1,161,667		$	1,018,503		$	2,113,523		$	1,898,585
Segment Income (Loss)
Domestic:
Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US	$	63,165		$	55,696		$	124,502		$	96,550
Fisher-Price Brands US		14,918			20,732			17,180			33,024
American Girl Brands		(1,638	)		(3,249	)		2,500			(249	)
Total Domestic		76,445			73,179			144,182			129,325
International		98,985			67,372			151,588			107,273
		175,430			140,551			295,770			236,598
Corporate and other expense (a)		(66,163	)		(71,115	)		(149,745	)		(121,935	)
Operating income		109,267			69,436			146,025			114,663
Interest expense		17,642			13,444			36,458			27,067
Interest (income)		(2,451	)		(2,782	)		(5,614	)		(5,234	)
Other non-operating (income), net		(812	)		(3,303	)		(968	)		(2,529	)
Income before income taxes	$	94,888		$	62,077		$	116,149		$	95,359

(a) Corporate and other expense includes (i) share-based compensation expense of $8.9 million and $19.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $12.6 million and $25.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, (ii) severance expense of $8.6 million and $10.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $8.7 million and $11.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, (iii) reduction to the legal settlement reserve for product liability-related litigation of $1.2 million and $8.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, (iv) $7.5 million Gunther-Wahl Productions legal settlement for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and (v) legal fees associated with MGA litigation matters.

22

	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
Assets
Domestic:
Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US	$	329,588	$	288,601	$	380,998
Fisher-Price Brands US		275,469		260,428		322,134
American Girl Brands		89,380		70,115		67,435
Total Domestic		694,437		619,144		770,567
International		965,517		691,459		779,875
		1,659,954		1,310,603		1,550,442
Corporate and other		135,579		92,087		59,502
Accounts receivable and inventories, net	$	1,795,533	$	1,402,690	$	1,609,944

Mattel sells a broad variety of toy products, which are grouped into three major categories: Mattel Girls & Boys Brands, Fisher-Price Brands, and American Girl Brands. The table below presents worldwide revenues by category:

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Worldwide Revenues
Mattel Girls & Boys Brands	$	795,625		$	653,159		$	1,452,001		$	1,226,271
Fisher-Price Brands		399,955			385,167			709,821			701,360
American Girl Brands		66,438			58,880			139,392			129,086
Other		2,138			4,839			4,051			5,602
Gross sales		1,264,156			1,102,045			2,305,265			2,062,319
Sales adjustments		(102,489	)		(83,542	)		(191,742	)		(163,734	)
Net sales	$	1,161,667		$	1,018,503		$	2,113,523		$	1,898,585

24.   New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2011-04,Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU 2011-04 clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 results in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. ASU 2011-04 will be effective for Mattel beginning after December 15, 2011. Mattel does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-04 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05,Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for Mattel beginning after December 15, 2011. Mattel does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-05 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position.

23

25.   Subsequent Events

On July 15, 2011, Mattel announced that the Board of Directors approved a third quarter dividend of $0.23 per common share. The dividend is payable on September 23, 2011 to stockholders of record on August 31, 2011.

24

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial information and related notes that appear in Part I, Item 1, of this Quarterly Report. Mattel’s business is seasonal; therefore, results of operations are comparable only with corresponding periods.

Factors That May Affect Future Results

(Cautionary Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995)

Mattel is including this Cautionary Statement to make applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) for forward-looking statements. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as “will,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “aims,” “intends,” or “projects.” A forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not occur. Investors should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. These forward-looking statements are all based on currently available operating, financial, economic and competitive information and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual future results and trends may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties detailed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in Mattel’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

Mattel designs, manufactures, and markets a broad variety of toy products worldwide, which are sold to its customers and directly to consumers. Mattel’s business is dependent in great part on its ability each year to redesign, restyle, and extend existing core products and product lines, to design and develop innovative new products and product lines, and to successfully market those products and product lines. Mattel plans to continue to focus on its portfolio of traditional brands that have historically had worldwide appeal, to create new brands utilizing its knowledge of children’s play patterns, and to target customer and consumer preferences around the world.

Mattel believes its products are among the most widely recognized toy products in the world. Mattel’s portfolio of brands and products are grouped in the following categories:

Mattel Girls & Boys Brands—including Barbie^® fashion dolls and accessories (“Barbie^®”), Polly Pocket^®, Little Mommy^®, Disney Classics^®, and Monster High^® (collectively “Other Girls Brands”), Hot Wheels^®, Matchbox^®, Battle Force 5^®, and Tyco R/C^® vehicles and play sets (collectively “Wheels”), and CARS^®, Radica^®, Toy Story^®, Max Steel^®, WWE^® Wrestling, and Batman^® products, and games and puzzles (collectively “Entertainment”).

Fisher-Price Brands—including Fisher-Price^®, Little People^®, BabyGear™, and View-Master^® (collectively “Core Fisher-Price^®”), Dora the Explorer^®, Go Diego Go!^®, Thomas and Friends^®, Sing-a-ma-jigs™, and See ‘N Say^® (collectively “Fisher-Price^® Friends”), and Power Wheels^®.

American Girl Brands—including My American Girl^®, the historical collection, and Bitty Baby^®. American Girl Brands products are sold directly to consumers via its catalogue, website, and proprietary retail stores. Its children’s publications are also sold to certain retailers.

Mattel’s objective is to continue to create long-term stockholder value by generating strong cash flow and deploying it in a disciplined and opportunistic manner as outlined in Mattel’s capital and investment framework (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital and Investment Framework”). To achieve this objective, management has established three overarching strategies.

25

The first strategy is to deliver consistent growth by continuing the momentum in its core brands, optimizing entertainment partnerships, building new franchises, and working to expand and leverage its international footprint.

The second strategy is to build on the progress it has made on improving operating margins through at least sustaining the gross margins and delivering another round of cost savings.

The third strategy is to generate significant cash flow and continue its disciplined, opportunistic, and value-enhancing deployment.

Second Quarter 2011 Overview

Mattel’s results for the second quarter of 2011 include a net sales increase of 14%, as compared to the second quarter of 2010. Net sales during the second quarter of 2011 reflects growth both domestically and internationally from sales of products tied to core brands and new entertainment properties. Additionally:

• Gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, decreased from 48.1% in the second quarter of 2010 to 47.9% in 2011, primarily due to higher product costs and higher royalty expense, partially offset by price increases.

• Operating income in the second quarter of 2011 was $109.3 million, as compared to $69.4 million in 2010. The increase in operating income is primarily due to higher net sales and gross profit, partially offset by higher advertising and promotion expenses and higher other selling and administrative expenses.

• Net income in the second quarter of 2011 was $80.5 million, as compared to $51.6 million in 2010. The increase in net income is primarily due to higher operating income, partially offset by higher interest expense associated with the $500.0 million of senior notes issued in September 2010.

• Mattel’s Operational Excellence 2.0 program generated gross savings of approximately $9 million during the second quarter of 2011.

Results of Operations—Second Quarter

Consolidated Results

Net sales for the second quarter of 2011 were $1.16 billion, up 14% as compared to $1.02 billion in 2010, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 5 percentage points. Net income for the second quarter of 2011 was $80.5 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, as compared to $51.6 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, in 2010. Net income for the second quarter of 2011 was positively impacted by higher net sales and gross profit, partially offset by higher advertising and promotion expenses and higher other selling and administrative expenses.

26

The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s consolidated results for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 (in millions, except percentage and basis point information):

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,												Year/Year Change
		2011						2010
		Amount			% of Net Sales			Amount			% of Net Sales			%			Basis Points of Net Sales
Net sales	��	$	1,161.7			100.0	%	$	1,018.5			100.0	%		14	%		—
Gross profit		$	556.2			47.9	%	$	489.6			48.1	%		14	%		–20
Advertising and promotion expenses			116.2			10.0			101.9			10.0			14	%		—
Other selling and administrative expenses			330.7			28.5			318.3			31.3			4	%		–280
Operating income			109.3			9.4			69.4			6.8			57	%		260
Interest expense			17.6			1.5			13.4			1.3			31	%		20
Interest (income)			(2.5	)		–0.2			(2.8	)		–0.3			–12	%		10
Other non-operating (income), net			(0.7	)					(3.3	)
Income before income taxes		$	94.9			8.2	%	$	62.1			6.1	%		53	%		210

Sales

Net sales for the second quarter of 2011 were $1.16 billion, up 14% as compared to $1.02 billion in 2010, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 5 percentage points. Gross sales within the US increased 7% in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to 2010, and accounted for 49% of consolidated gross sales in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to 52% of consolidated gross sales in 2010. Gross sales in international markets increased 23% in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to 2010, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 11 percentage points.

Worldwide gross sales of Mattel Girls & Boys Brands increased 22% in the second quarter of 2011 to $795.6 million, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 7 percentage points. Domestic gross sales of Mattel Girls & Boys Brands increased 12% and international gross sales increased 30%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 12 percentage points. Worldwide gross sales of Barbie^® increased 12%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 6 percentage points. Domestic gross sales of Barbie^® were flat and international gross sales increased 20%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 10 percentage points. Worldwide gross sales of Other Girls products increased 29%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 7 percentage points, driven primarily by sales of Monster High™ products and higher sales of Disney Princess™ products, partially offset by lower sales of Polly Pocket^® products. Worldwide gross sales of Wheels products decreased 2%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 5 percentage points, driven primarily by lower sales of Hot Wheels^® products domestically. Worldwide gross sales of Hot Wheels^® decreased 2%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 6 percentage points. Worldwide gross sales of Entertainment products increased 41%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 8 percentage points, driven primarily by sales of CARS^® and Green Lantern^® products, partially offset by lower sales of Toy Story^® 3 products.

Worldwide gross sales of Fisher-Price Brands increased 4% in the second quarter of 2011 to $400.0 million, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 3 percentage points. Domestic gross sales of Fisher-Price Brands were flat and international gross sales increased 9%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 8 percentage points. Worldwide gross sales of Core Fisher-Price^® increased 9%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 3 percentage points. Domestic gross sales of Core Fisher-Price^® increased 9% and international gross sales increased 9%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 8 percentage points. Worldwide gross sales of Fisher-Price^® Friends decreased 11%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 4 percentage points, driven primarily by the discontinuation of the Sesame Street^® license, partially

27

offset by higher sales of Thomas and Friends^® products internationally. Domestic gross sales of Fisher-Price^® Friends decreased 27% and international gross sales increased 10%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 8 percentage points.

American Girl Brands gross sales increased 13% in the second quarter of 2011 to $66.4 million, driven primarily by Kanani™, the 2011 Girl of the Year^® doll, and the new American Girl^® stores in Overland Park, Kansas and McLean, Virginia, which opened in September 2010 and June 2011, respectively.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 52.1% in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to 51.9% in 2010. Cost of sales increased by $76.5 million, or 14%, from $528.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 to $605.4 million in 2011, as compared to a 14% increase in net sales. Within cost of sales, product costs increased by $56.1 million, or 13%, from $420.7 million in the second quarter of 2010 to $476.8 million in 2011; royalty expense increased by $15.2 million, or 30%, from $50.4 million in the second quarter of 2010 to $65.6 million in 2011; and freight and logistics expenses increased by $5.2 million, or 9%, from $57.8 million in the second quarter of 2010 to $63.0 million in 2011.

Gross Profit

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 47.9% in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to 48.1% in 2010. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was driven primarily by higher product costs and higher royalty expense, partially offset by price increases.

Advertising and Promotion Expenses

Advertising and promotion expenses remained flat at 10.0% of net sales in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010.

Other Selling and Administrative Expenses

Other selling and administrative expenses were $330.8 million, or 28.5% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to $318.3 million, or 31.3% of net sales, in 2010. The dollar increase is driven primarily by the impact of foreign currency exchange and investments in strategic initiatives, partially offset by savings from Mattel’s Operational Excellence 2.0 program and lower legal-related costs.

Non-Operating Items

Interest expense increased from $13.4 million in the second quarter of 2010 to $17.6 million in 2011, driven primarily by interest expense associated with the $500.0 million of senior notes issued in September 2010. Interest income decreased from $2.8 million in the second quarter of 2010 to $2.5 million in 2011, driven primarily by lower average interest rates, partially offset by higher average invested cash balances. The change in other non-operating income primarily relates to foreign currency exchange gains/losses.

Provision for Income Taxes

Mattel’s provision for income taxes was $14.4 million in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to $10.5 million in 2010. Mattel recognized discrete tax benefits of $6.4 million and $4.6 million during the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively, primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions, settlements, and enacted tax law changes.

28

Business Segment Results

Mattel’s reportable segments are separately managed business units and are divided on a geographic basis between domestic and international. The Domestic segment is further divided into Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US, Fisher-Price Brands US, and American Girl Brands.

Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US

Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US gross sales were $323.1 million in the second quarter of 2011, up $33.4 million or 12%, as compared to $289.7 million in 2010. Within this segment, gross sales of Barbie^® products remained flat and gross sales of Other Girls products increased 7%, driven primarily by sales of Monster High™ products, partially offset by lower sales of Polly Pocket^® products. Gross sales of Wheels products decreased 18%, driven primarily by lower sales of Hot Wheels^® products. Gross sales of Entertainment products increased 37%, driven primarily by sales of CARS^® and Green Lantern^® products, partially offset by lower sales of Toy Story^® 3 products. Cost of sales increased 15% in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to an 11% increase in net sales, primarily due to higher product costs and royalty expense. Gross margin decreased primarily due to higher product costs and royalty expenses, partially offset by price increases.

Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US segment income increased $7.5 million, or 13%, from $55.7 million in the second quarter of 2010 to $63.2 million in 2011, driven primarily by higher sales, partially offset by lower gross margin.

Fisher-Price Brands US

Fisher-Price Brands US gross sales were $224.1 million in the second quarter of 2011, up $0.2 million, as compared to $223.9 million in 2010. Within this segment, gross sales of Core Fisher-Price^® products increased 9%. Gross sales of Fisher-Price^® Friends products decreased 27%, driven primarily by the discontinuation of the Sesame Street^® license. Cost of sales increased 1% in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to a 1% decrease in net sales, primarily due to higher product costs, partially offset by lower freight and logistics costs. Gross margin decreased primarily due to higher product costs and unfavorable product mix, partially offset by price increases.

Fisher-Price Brands US segment income decreased $5.8 million, from $20.7 million in the second quarter of 2010 to $14.9 million in 2011, driven primarily by lower sales and lower gross margin.

American Girl Brands

American Girl Brands gross sales were $66.4 million in the second quarter of 2011, up $7.5 million or 13%, as compared to $58.9 million in 2010, driven primarily by higher sales of Kanani™, the 2011 Girl of the Year^® doll, and the new stores in Overland Park, Kansas and McLean, Virginia, which opened in September 2010 and June 2011, respectively. Cost of sales increased 10% in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to a 12% increase in net sales, primarily due to higher product costs. Gross margin improvement was primarily due to price increases and favorable product mix, partially offset by higher product costs.

American Girl Brands segment loss decreased from a $3.2 million loss in the second quarter of 2010 to a $1.6 million loss in 2011, driven primarily by higher sales and higher gross margin, partially offset by higher other selling and administrative expenses.

29

International

The following table provides a summary of percentage changes in gross sales within the International segment for the second quarter of 2011 versus 2010:

Non-US Regions:	% Change in Gross Sales		Impact of Change in Currency (in % pts)
Total International		23		11
Europe		27		12
Latin America		20		9
Asia Pacific		20		9
Other		15		5

International gross sales were $650.5 million in the second quarter of 2011, up $120.9 million or 23%, as compared to $529.6 million in 2010, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 11 percentage points. Gross sales of Mattel Girls & Boys Brands increased 30%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 12 percentage points. Gross sales of Barbie^® products increased 20%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 10 percentage points. Gross sales of Other Girls products increased 49%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 14 percentage points, driven primarily by sales of Monster High™ products and higher sales of Disney Princess™ products, partially offset by lower sales of Polly Pocket^® products. Gross sales of Wheels products increased 10%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 9 percentage points, driven primarily by increased sales of Hot Wheels^® products. Gross sales of Entertainment products increased 45%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 14 percentage points, driven primarily by sales of CARS^® and Green Lantern^® products, partially offset by lower sales of Toy Story^® 3 products. Gross sales of Fisher-Price Brands increased 9%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 8 percentage points. Gross sales of Core Fisher-Price^® products increased 9%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 8 percentage points. Gross sales of Fisher-Price^® Friends products increased 10%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 8 percentage points, driven primarily by higher sales of Thomas and Friends^® products, partially offset by the discontinuation of the Sesame Street^® license. Cost of sales increased 24% in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to a 23% increase in net sales, primarily due to higher product costs and higher royalty expense. Gross margin decreased primarily due to higher product costs and royalty expense, partially offset by price increases.

International segment income increased $31.6 million, or 47%, from $67.4 million in the second quarter of 2010 to $99.0 million in 2011, driven primarily by higher sales, partially offset by lower gross margin.

Results of Operations—First Half

Consolidated Results

Net sales for the first half of 2011 were $2.11 billion, up 11% as compared to $1.90 billion in 2010, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 3 percentage points. Net income for the first half of 2011 was $97.1 million, or $0.27 per diluted share, as compared to $76.4 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, in 2010. Net income for the first half of 2011 was positively impacted by higher net sales and gross margins, partially offset by higher other selling and administrative expenses and higher advertising and promotion expense.

30

The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s consolidated results for the first half of 2011 and 2010 (in millions, except percentage and basis point information):

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,												Year/Year Change
	2011						2010
	Amount			% of Net Sales			Amount			% of Net Sales			%			Basis Points of Net Sales
Net sales	$	2,113.5			100.0	%	$	1,898.6			100.0	%		11	%		—
Gross profit	$	1,029.4			48.7	%	$	921.5			48.5	%		12	%		20
Advertising and promotion expenses		218.0			10.3			196.0			10.3			11	%		—
Other selling and administrative expenses		665.4			31.5			610.8			32.2			9	%		–70
Operating income		146.0			6.9			114.7			6.0			27	%		90
Interest expense		36.5			1.7			27.1			1.4			35	%		30
Interest (income)		(5.6	)		–0.3			(5.2	)		–0.3			7	%		—
Other non-operating (income), net		(1.0	)					(2.6	)
Income before income taxes	$	116.1			5.5	%	$	95.4			5.0	%		22	%		50

Sales

Net sales for the first half of 2011 were $2.11 billion, up 11% as compared to $1.90 billion in 2010, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 3 percentage points. Gross sales within the US increased 7% in the first half of 2011, as compared to 2010, and accounted for 50% of consolidated gross sales in the first half of 2011 as compared to 53% of consolidated gross sales in 2010. Gross sales in international markets increased 17% in the first half of 2011, as compared to 2010, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 6 percentage points.

Worldwide gross sales of Mattel Girls & Boys Brands increased 18% in the first half of 2011 to $1.45 billion, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 3 percentage points. Domestic gross sales of Mattel Girls & Boys Brands increased 14% and international gross sales increased 22%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 7 percentage points. Worldwide gross sales of Barbie^® increased 13%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 4 percentage points. Domestic gross sales of Barbie^® were flat and international gross sales increased 21%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 6 percentage points. Worldwide gross sales of Other Girls products increased 34%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 4 percentage points, driven primarily by sales of Monster High™ products and higher sales of Disney Princess™ products, partially offset by lower sales of Polly Pocket^® products. Worldwide gross sales of Wheels products increased 1%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 3 percentage points, driven primarily by higher sales of Hot Wheels^® products internationally. Worldwide gross sales of Hot Wheels^® increased 2%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 4 percentage points. Worldwide gross sales of Entertainment products increased 30%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 5 percentage points, driven primarily by sales of CARS^® and Green Lantern^® products, partially offset by lower sales of Toy Story^® 3 products.

Worldwide gross sales of Fisher-Price Brands increased 1% in the first half of 2011 to $709.8 million, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 2 percentage points. Domestic gross sales of Fisher-Price Brands decreased 3% and international gross sales increased 6%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 4 percentage points. Worldwide gross sales of Core Fisher-Price^® increased 5%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 2 percentage points. Domestic gross sales of Core Fisher-Price^® increased 3% and international gross sales increased 7%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 4 percentage points. Worldwide gross sales of Fisher-Price^® Friends decreased 12%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 2 percentage points, driven primarily by the discontinuation of the Sesame Street^® license, partially

31

offset by higher sales of Thomas and Friends^® products internationally. Domestic gross sales of Fisher-Price^® Friends decreased 24% and international gross sales increased 4%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 6 percentage points.

American Girl Brands gross sales increased 8% in the first half of 2011 to $139.4 million, driven primarily by Kanani™, the 2011 Girl of the Year^® doll, and the new stores in Lone Tree, Colorado, Overland Park, Kansas, and McLean, Virginia, which opened in March 2010, September 2010, and June 2011, respectively.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 51.3% in the first half of 2011, as compared to 51.5% in 2010. Cost of sales increased by $107.0 million, or 11%, from $977.1 million in the first half of 2010 to $1.08 billion in 2011, as compared to an 11% increase in net sales. Within cost of sales, product costs increased by $82.0 million, or 11%, from $774.9 million in the first half of 2010 to $856.9 million in 2011; royalty expense increased by $17.5 million, or 20%, from $86.1 million in the first half of 2010 to $103.6 million in 2011; and freight and logistics expenses increased by $7.5 million, or 6%, from $116.1 million in the first half of 2010 to $123.6 million in 2011.

Gross Profit

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 48.7% in the first half of 2011, as compared to 48.5% in 2010. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was driven primarily by price increases, partially offset by higher product costs and royalty expense.

Advertising and Promotion Expenses

Advertising and promotion expenses remained flat at 10.3% of net sales in the first half of 2011 and 2010.

Other Selling and Administrative Expenses

Other selling and administrative expenses were $665.4 million, or 31.5% of net sales, in the first half of 2011, as compared to $610.8 million, or 32.2% of net sales, in 2010. The dollar increase is driven primarily by higher legal-related costs, higher employee-related costs, including merit and other compensation expense, and unfavorable foreign currency exchange, partially offset by savings from Mattel’s Operational Excellence 2.0 program.

Non-Operating Items

Interest expense increased from $27.1 million in the first half of 2010 to $36.5 million in 2011, driven primarily by interest expense associated with the $500.0 million of senior notes issued in September 2010. Interest income increased from $5.2 million in the first half of 2010 to $5.6 million in 2011, driven primarily by higher average invested cash balances, partially offset by lower average interest rates. The change in other non-operating income primarily relates to foreign currency exchange gains/losses.

Provision for Income Taxes

Mattel’s income tax provision was $19.0 million in the first half of 2011, as compared to $18.9 million in 2010. Mattel recognized discrete tax benefits of $6.4 million and $4.3 million during the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively, primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions, settlements, and enacted tax law changes.

32

During the first half of 2010, Mattel reached a resolution with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) regarding all open issues relating to the examination of Mattel’s US federal income tax returns for the years 2006 and 2007. The resolution did not have a material impact on Mattel’s consolidated financial statement for the first half of 2010.

Business Segment Results

Mattel’s reportable segments are separately managed business units and are divided on a geographic basis between domestic and international. The Domestic segment is further divided into Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US, Fisher-Price Brands US, and American Girl Brands.

Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US

Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US gross sales were $626.8 million in the first half of 2011, up $77.8 million or 14%, as compared to $549.0 million in 2010. Within this segment, gross sales of Barbie^® products remained flat and gross sales of Other Girls products increased 31%, driven primarily by sales of Monster High™ and Disney Princess™ products, partially offset by lower sales of Polly Pocket^® products. Gross sales of Wheels products decreased 8%, driven primarily by lower sales of Hot Wheels^® products. Gross sales of Entertainment products increased 34%, driven primarily by increased sales of CARS^® and Green Lantern^® products, partially offset by lower sales of Toy Story^® 3 products. Cost of sales increased 14% in the first half of 2011, as compared to a 14% increase in net sales, primarily due to higher product costs and royalty expense. Gross margin improvement was primarily due to price increases and favorable product mix, partially offset by higher product costs and royalty expense.

Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US segment income increased $27.9 million, or 29%, from $96.6 million in the first half of 2010 to $124.5 million in 2011, driven primarily by higher sales and gross margin.

Fisher-Price Brands US

Fisher-Price Brands US gross sales were $396.8 million in the first half of 2011, down $10.3 million or 3%, as compared to $407.1 million in 2010. Within this segment, gross sales of Core Fisher-Price^® products increased 3%. Gross sales of Fisher-Price^® Friends products decreased 24%, driven primarily by the discontinuation of the Sesame Street^® license. Cost of sales were flat in the first half of 2011, as compared to a 4% decrease in net sales, primarily due to lower freight and logistics costs, offset by higher product costs. Gross margin decreased primarily due to higher product costs and unfavorable product mix, partially offset by lower freight and logistics costs.

Fisher-Price Brands US segment income decreased $15.8 million, from $33.0 million in the first half of 2010 to $17.2 million in 2011, driven primarily by lower sales and gross margin.

American Girl Brands

American Girl Brands gross sales were $139.4 million in the first half of 2011, up $10.3 million or 8%, as compared to $129.1 million in 2010, driven primarily by higher sales of Kanani™, the 2011 Girl of the Year^® doll, and the new stores in Lone Tree, Colorado, Overland Park, Kansas, and McLean, Virginia, which opened in March 2010, September 2010, and June 2011, respectively. Cost of sales increased 7% in the first half of 2011, as compared to an 8% increase in net sales, primarily due to higher product costs and freight and logistics costs. Gross margin improvement was primarily due to price increases and favorable product mix, partially offset by higher product costs and freight and logistics costs.

American Girl Brands segment income increased $2.7 million, from a loss of $0.2 million in the first half of 2010 to income of $2.5 million in 2011, driven primarily by higher sales and gross margin, partially offset by higher other selling and administrative expenses.

33

International

The following table provides a summary of percentage changes in gross sales within the International segment for the first half of 2011 versus 2010:

Non-US Regions:	% Change in Gross Sales		Impact of Change in Currency (in % pts)
Total International		17		6
Europe		14		6
Latin America		23		9
Asia Pacific		20		8
Other		13		5

International gross sales were $1.14 billion in the first half of 2011, up $165.2 million or 17%, as compared to $977.1 million in 2010, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 6 percentage points. Gross sales of Mattel Girls & Boys Brands increased 22%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 7 percentage points. Gross sales of Barbie^® products increased 21%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 6 percentage points. Gross sales of Other Girls products increased 36%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 6 percentage points, driven primarily by sales of Monster High™ products and higher sales of Disney Princess™ products, partially offset by lower sales of Polly Pocket^® products. Gross sales of Wheels products increased 8%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 6 percentage points, driven primarily by increased sales of Hot Wheels^® products. Gross sales of Entertainment products increased 26%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 9 percentage points, driven primarily by sales of CARS^® and Green Lantern^® products, partially offset by lower sales of Toy Story^® 3 products. Gross sales of Fisher-Price Brands increased 6%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 4 percentage points. Gross sales of Core Fisher-Price^® products increased 7%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 4 percentage points. Gross sales of Fisher-Price^® Friends products increased 4%, with favorable changes in currency exchange rates of 6 percentage points, driven primarily by higher sales of Thomas and Friends^® products, partially offset by the discontinuation of the Sesame Street^® license. Cost of sales increased 17% in the first half of 2011, as compared to a 17% increase in net sales, primarily due to higher product costs and royalty expense. Gross margin decreased primarily due to higher product costs and royalty expense, partially offset by price increases.

International segment income increased $44.3 million, or 41%, from $107.3 million in the first half of 2010 to $151.6 million in 2011, driven primarily by higher sales, partially offset by lower gross margin.

Operational Excellence 2.0

The first phase of Mattel’s cost savings program, Global Cost Leadership, delivered cumulative net savings of approximately $212 million in 2009 and 2010, which equated to cumulative gross savings of $225 million. During 2011, Mattel initiated the second phase of its cost savings program, Operational Excellence 2.0, which targets additional cumulative cost savings of approximately $150 million by the end of 2012. The cost savings are expected to include a reduction of approximately $75 million in legal costs, which will lower other selling and administrative expenses, and approximately $75 million of structural cost savings executed through a handful of important initiatives, which will be reflected in gross profit, advertising and promotion expenses, and other selling and administrative expenses. The major initiatives within Mattel’s Operational Excellence 2.0 program include:

• The creation of global brand teams and reorganization to a North America division,

• Additional procurement initiatives designed to fully leverage Mattel’s global scale,

• SKU efficiency, and

• Packaging optimization.

34

Mattel recognized Operational Excellence 2.0 gross savings of approximately $9 million and $14 million in the second quarter and first half of 2011, respectively. While some of the positive impact will be seen in 2011, Mattel expects to realize the majority of the $150 million savings goal in 2012, given the timing of investment costs and timelines required to complete the initiatives.

Income Taxes

Mattel’s provision for income taxes was $19.0 million in the first half of 2011, as compared to $18.9 million for the first half of 2010. Mattel recognized discrete tax benefits of $6.4 million and $4.3 million during the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively, primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions, settlements, and enacted tax law changes.

During the first half of 2010, Mattel reached a resolution with the IRS regarding all open issues relating to the examination of Mattel’s US federal income tax returns for the years 2006 and 2007. The resolution did not have a material impact on Mattel’s consolidated financial statement for the first half of 2010.

During the normal course of business, Mattel is regularly audited by federal, state, and foreign tax authorities. The IRS is currently auditing Mattel’s 2008 and 2009 federal income tax returns. The IRS audit plan calls for the completion of the current examination in the second quarter of 2012. At this time, there is insufficient information related to current IRS, state, and foreign audits to quantify any possible changes in the unrecognized tax benefits that may occur during the next twelve months.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Mattel’s primary sources of liquidity are its cash and equivalents balances, access to short-term borrowing facilities, including Mattel’s commercial paper program and its $1.4 billion domestic unsecured committed revolving credit facility, and issuances of long-term debt securities. Cash flows from operating activities could be negatively impacted by decreased demand for Mattel’s products, which could result from factors such as adverse economic conditions and changes in public and consumer preferences, or by increased costs associated with manufacturing and distribution of products or shortages in raw materials or component parts. Additionally, Mattel’s ability to issue long-term debt and obtain seasonal financing could be adversely affected by factors such as global economic crises and tight credit environments, an inability to meet its debt covenant requirements, which include maintaining consolidated debt-to-earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) and interest coverage ratios, or a deterioration of Mattel’s credit ratings. Mattel’s ability to conduct its operations could be negatively impacted should these or other adverse conditions affect its primary sources of liquidity.

Current Market Conditions

Mattel is exposed to financial market risk resulting from changes in interest and foreign currency rates. Mattel believes that it has ample liquidity to fund its business needs, including beginning of year cash and equivalents, cash flows from operations, and access to the commercial paper market and its $1.4 billion domestic unsecured committed revolving credit facility, which the Company uses for seasonal working capital requirements. As of June 30, 2011, Mattel had available incremental borrowing resources totaling $1.4 billion under its domestic unsecured committed revolving credit facility, and Mattel has not experienced any limitations on its ability to access this source of liquidity. Market conditions could affect certain terms of other debt instruments that Mattel enters into from time to time.

Mattel monitors the third-party depository institutions that hold the company’s cash and equivalents. Mattel’s emphasis is primarily on safety and liquidity of principal, and secondarily on maximizing the yield on those funds. Mattel diversifies its cash and equivalents among counterparties and securities to minimize risks.

35

Mattel is subject to credit risks relating to the ability of its counterparties of hedging transactions to meet their contractual payment obligations. The risks related to creditworthiness and nonperformance have been considered in the fair value measurements of Mattel’s foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Mattel closely monitors its counterparties and takes action, as necessary, to manage its counterparty credit risk.

Mattel expects that some of its customers and vendors may experience difficulty in obtaining the liquidity required to buy inventory or raw materials. Mattel monitors its customers’ financial condition and their liquidity in order to mitigate Mattel’s accounts receivable collectibility risks, and customer terms and credit limits are adjusted, if necessary. Additionally, Mattel uses a variety of financial arrangements to ensure collectibility of accounts receivable of customers deemed to be a credit risk, including requiring letters of credit, factoring or purchasing various forms of credit insurance with unrelated third parties, or requiring cash in advance of shipment.

Mattel sponsors defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans for its employees. Actual returns below the expected rate of return, along with changes in interest rates that affect the measurement of the liability, would impact the amount and timing of Mattel’s future contributions to these plans.

Capital and Investment Framework

To guide future capital deployment decisions, with a goal of maximizing stockholder value, Mattel’s Board of Directors in 2003 established the following capital and investment framework:

• To maintain approximately $800 million to $1 billion in year-end cash available to fund a substantial portion of seasonal working capital;

• To maintain a year-end debt-to-capital ratio of about 25%;

• To invest approximately $180 million to $200 million in capital expenditures annually to maintain and grow the business;

• To make strategic opportunistic acquisitions; and

• To return excess funds to stockholders through dividends and share repurchases.

Over the long term, assuming cash flows from operating activities remain strong, Mattel plans to use its free cash flows to invest in strategic acquisitions and to return funds to stockholders through cash dividends and share repurchases. Mattel’s share repurchase program has no expiration date and repurchases will take place from time to time, depending on market conditions. The ability to successfully implement the capital deployment plan is directly dependent on Mattel’s ability to generate strong cash flows from operating activities. There is no assurance that Mattel will continue to generate strong cash flows from operating activities or achieve its targeted goals for investing activities.

Operating Activities

Cash flows used for operating activities were $226.8 million in the first half of 2011, as compared to $372.1 million in 2010. The decrease in cash flows used for operating activities was primarily due to the collection of $300.0 million of domestic receivables not factored in 2010 and higher net income, partially offset by higher working capital usage.

Investing Activities

Cash flows used for investing activities were $44.4 million in the first half of 2011, as compared to $97.3 million in 2010. The decrease in cash flows used for investing activities was primarily due to higher net proceeds received relating to settled foreign currency forward exchange contracts, partially offset by higher purchases of other property, plant, and equipment and tools, dies, and molds.

36

Financing Activities

Cash flows used for financing activities were $600.8 million in the first half of 2011, as compared to $99.1 million in 2010. The increase in cash flows used for financing activities was primarily due to the $200.0 million repayment of 2006 Senior Notes, higher share repurchases, and dividend payments made during the first half of 2011, partially offset by higher proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

Seasonal Financing

Mattel maintains and periodically amends or replaces its domestic unsecured committed revolving credit facility with a commercial bank group that is used as a back-up facility to Mattel’s commercial paper program, which is used as the primary source of financing for the seasonal working capital requirements of its domestic subsidiaries. The revolving credit facility was amended and restated on March 8, 2011 to, among other things, (i) extend the maturity date of the credit facility to March 8, 2015, (ii) increase aggregate commitments under the credit facility to $1.4 billion, with an “accordion feature,” which allows Mattel to increase the aggregate availability under the credit facility to $1.6 billion under certain circumstances, (iii) decrease the applicable interest rate margins to a range of 0.25% to 1.50% above the applicable base rate for base rate loans, and 1.25% to 2.50% above the applicable London Interbank Borrowing Rate for Eurodollar rate loans, in each case depending on Mattel’s senior unsecured long-term debt rating, and (iv) decrease commitment fees to a range of 0.15% to 0.40% of the unused commitments under the credit facility.

In connection with the execution of the amendment of the domestic unsecured revolving credit facility, Mattel terminated its $300.0 million domestic receivables sales facility, which was a sub-facility of the domestic unsecured committed revolving credit facility.

Mattel is required to meet financial covenants at the end of each quarter and fiscal year, using the formulae specified in the credit facility agreement to calculate the ratios. Mattel was in compliance with such covenants at the end of the six months ended June 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2011, Mattel’s consolidated debt-to-EBITDA ratio, as calculated per the terms of the credit agreement, was 0.9 to 1 (compared to a maximum allowed of 3.0 to 1) and Mattel’s interest coverage ratio was 14.9 to 1 (compared to a minimum required of 3.50 to 1).

The domestic unsecured committed revolving credit facility is a material agreement and failure to comply with the financial covenant ratios may result in an event of default under the terms of the facility. If Mattel defaulted under the terms of the domestic unsecured committed revolving credit facility, its ability to meet its seasonal financing requirements could be adversely affected.

To finance seasonal working capital requirements of certain foreign subsidiaries, Mattel avails itself of individual short-term credit lines with a number of banks. Mattel expects to extend the majority of these credit lines throughout 2011.

In May 2011, a major credit rating agency changed Mattel’s long-term credit rating from BBB+ to A-, and maintained its short-term credit rating of F-2 and outlook at stable. In April 2011, another major credit rating agency changed Mattel’s long-term credit rating from BBB to BBB+, and maintained its short-term credit rating of A-2 and outlook at stable. Additionally, in April 2011, a major credit rating agency changed Mattel’s long-term credit rating from Baa2 to Baa1, and maintained its short-term credit rating of P-2 and outlook at stable.

Mattel believes its cash on hand, amounts available under its domestic unsecured committed revolving credit facility, and its foreign credit lines will be adequate to meet its seasonal financing requirements in 2011.

Financial Position

Mattel’s cash and equivalents decreased by $862.6 million to $418.5 million at June 30, 2011, as compared to December 31, 2010. The decrease was driven by seasonal increases in working capital usage, $251.9 million of share repurchases, repayment of $200.0 million of 2006 Senior Notes and $40.0 million of Medium-term notes, and $159.9 million of dividend payments made in the first half of 2011.

37

Accounts receivable increased by $206.9 million to $1.0 billion at June 30, 2011, as compared to June 30, 2010, primarily due to higher sales, a shift in the timing of sales to later in the quarter, and a shift in sales mix to countries with longer sales terms.

Inventories increased by $185.9 million to $783.5 million at June 30, 2011, as compared to June 30, 2010, primarily due to low 2010 inventory levels, higher product costs, the need to improve customer service, and the need to build inventory to support growth and the theatrical releases of key entertainment properties.

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities decreased by $177.4 million to $871.1 million at June 30, 2011, as compared to December 31, 2010. The decrease was driven primarily by the timing and amount of payments for various liabilities, including incentive compensation, taxes other than income taxes, advertising, and royalties.

The current portion of long-term debt decreased $240.0 million to $10.0 million at June 30, 2011, as compared to $250.0 million at December 31, 2010 due to the repayment of $200.0 million of the 2006 Senior Notes and $40.0 million of Medium-term notes.

A summary of Mattel’s capitalization is as follows:

	June 30, 2011				June 30, 2010				December 31, 2010
	(In millions, except percentage information)
Medium-term notes	$	100.0	3	%	$	110.0	3	%	$	100.0	2	%
2008 Senior Notes		350.0	9			350.0	10			350.0	9
2010 Senior Notes		500.0	13			—	—			500.0	12
Total noncurrent long-term debt		950.0	25			460.0	13			950.0	23
Other noncurrent liabilities		482.2	12			481.0	14			488.9	12
Stockholders’ equity		2,466.9	63			2,507.0	73			2,628.6	65
	$	3,899.1	100	%	$	3,448.0	100	%	$	4,067.5	100	%

Total noncurrent long-term debt totaled $950.0 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Total noncurrent long-term debt increased $490.0 million at June 30, 2011, as compared to June 30, 2010, due primarily to the $500.0 million issuance of senior notes in September 2010, partially offset by the reclassification of $10.0 million of Medium-term notes to current. Mattel expects to satisfy its future long-term capital needs through the generation of corporate earnings and issuance of long-term debt instruments, as needed.

Stockholders’ equity of $2.47 billion decreased $40.1 million from June 30, 2010, primarily as a result of share repurchases, Mattel’s 2010 annual dividend payment in the fourth quarter of 2010, and dividend payments made in the first half of 2011, partially offset by the impact of foreign currency translation adjustments and net income. Stockholders’ equity decreased by $161.7 million from December 31, 2010, primarily as a result of share repurchases and dividend payments made in the first half of 2011, partially offset by the impact of foreign currency translation adjustments and net income.

Mattel’s debt-to-total-capital ratio, including short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt, increased from 22.1% at June 30, 2010 to 28.0% at June 30, 2011 due primarily to the $500.0 million issuance of senior notes in September 2010. Mattel’s objective is to maintain a year-end debt-to-capital ratio of approximately 25%.

Litigation

See Part II, Item 1 “Legal Proceedings.”

38

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Mattel’s critical accounting policies and estimates are included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and did not change during the first half of 2011.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Item 1 “Financial Statements—Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—New Accounting Pronouncements.”

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Mattel includes a non-GAAP financial measure, gross sales, which it uses to analyze its continuing operations and to monitor, assess and identify meaningful trends in its operating and financial performance. Net sales, as reported in the consolidated statements of operations, include the impact of sales adjustments, such as trade discounts and other allowances. Gross sales represent sales to customers, excluding the impact of sales adjustments.

Consistent with its segment reporting, Mattel presents changes in gross sales as a metric for comparing its aggregate, business unit, brand and geographic results to highlight significant trends in Mattel’s business. Changes in gross sales are discussed because, while Mattel records the detail of such sales adjustments in its financial accounting systems at the time of sale, such sales adjustments are generally not associated with individual products, making net sales less meaningful. A reconciliation of gross sales to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, net sales, is as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
	(In thousands)
Revenues
Domestic:
Mattel Girls & Boys Brands US	$	323,062		$	289,733		$	626,827		$	549,039
Fisher-Price Brands US		224,129			223,853			396,788			407,102
American Girl Brands		66,438			58,880			139,392			129,086
Total Domestic		613,629			572,466			1,163,007			1,085,227
International		650,527			529,579			1,142,258			977,092
Gross sales		1,264,156			1,102,045			2,305,265			2,062,319
Sales adjustments		(102,489	)		(83,542	)		(191,742	)		(163,734	)
Net sales	$	1,161,667		$	1,018,503		$	2,113,523		$	1,898,585

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Currency exchange rate fluctuations may impact Mattel’s results of operations and cash flows. Inventory purchase and sale transactions denominated in the Euro, British pound sterling, and Mexican peso were the primary transactions that caused foreign currency transaction exposure for Mattel. Mattel seeks to mitigate its exposure to market risk by monitoring its currency transaction exposure for the year and partially hedging such exposure using foreign currency forward exchange contracts primarily to hedge its purchase and sale of inventory, and other intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies. These contracts generally have maturity dates of up to 18 months. For those intercompany receivables and payables that are not hedged, the transaction gains or losses are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations in the period in which the exchange rate changes as part of operating income or other non-operating (income) expense, net based on the

39

nature of the underlying transaction. Transaction gains or losses on hedged intercompany inventory transactions are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations in the period in which the inventory is sold to customers. In addition, Mattel manages its exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations through the selection of currencies used for international borrowings. Mattel does not trade in financial instruments for speculative purposes.

Mattel’s financial position is also impacted by currency exchange rate fluctuations on translation of its net investment in subsidiaries with non-US dollar functional currencies. Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries with non-US dollar functional currencies are translated into US dollars at fiscal period-end exchange rates. Income, expense, and cash flow items are translated at weighted average exchange rates prevailing during the fiscal year. The resulting currency translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders’ equity. Mattel’s primary currency translation exposures for the first half of 2011 were related to its net investment in entities having functional currencies denominated in the Euro, Mexican peso, Brazilian real, and British pound sterling.

There are numerous factors impacting the amount by which Mattel’s financial results are affected by foreign currency translation and transaction gains and losses resulting from changes in currency exchange rates, including, but not limited to, the level of foreign currency forward exchange contracts in place at a given time and the volume of foreign currency denominated transactions in a given period. However, assuming that such factors were held constant, Mattel estimates that a 1 percent change in the US dollar Trade-Weighted Index would impact Mattel’s net sales by approximately 0.5% and its full year earnings per share by approximately $0.01 to $0.02.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2011, Mattel’s disclosure controls and procedures were evaluated to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by Mattel in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, in a timely manner that would alert them to material information relating to Mattel that would be required to be included in Mattel’s periodic reports and to provide reasonable assurance that such information was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Based on this evaluation, Robert A. Eckert, Mattel’s principal executive officer, and Kevin M. Farr, Mattel’s principal financial officer, concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Mattel made no changes to its internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to have materially affected, its internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

40

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

The content of Note 22, “Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Mattel in Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety in this Item 1.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in Mattel’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the second quarter of 2011, Mattel did not sell any unregistered securities.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

This table provides certain information with respect to Mattel’s purchases of its common stock during the second quarter of 2011:

Period	Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1—30
Repurchase program (1)		1,582,207	$	25.62		1,582,207	$	322,941,467
Employee transactions (2)		4,543		25.77		N/A		N/A
May 1—31
Repurchase program (1)		1,873,600		26.54		1,873,600		273,221,429
Employee transactions (2)		5,883		26.36		N/A		N/A
June 1—30
Repurchase program (1)		2,349,641		26.16		2,349,641		211,755,747
Employee transactions (2)		810		25.87		N/A		N/A
Total
Repurchase program (1)		5,805,448	$	26.13		5,805,448	$	211,755,747
Employee transactions (2)		11,236		26.08		N/A		N/A

(1) Repurchases will take place from time to time, depending on market conditions. Mattel’s share repurchase program has no expiration date.

(2) Includes the sale of restricted shares for employee tax withholding obligations that occur upon vesting.

N/A Not applicable.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

41

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description
3.1*	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mattel, Inc.
12.0*	Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges
31.0*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer dated July 20, 2011 pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.1*	Certification of Principal Financial Officer dated July 20, 2011 pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.0**	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer dated July 20, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)
101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

(1) This exhibit should not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

42

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MATTEL, INC.
Registrant
By:	/s/ H. Scott Topham
	H. Scott Topham
	Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller (Duly authorized officer and chief accounting officer)

Date: July 20, 2011

43