Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2001, was less than the three months ended September 30, 2000, as interest income was less due to a lower level of investable funds. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, varied from the statutory tax rate (34%) primarily as a result of tax credits. Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, were $67,220,000 versus $80,473,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2000. Sales of Industrial Equipment declined by $6,970,000, while sales of Dairy Farm Equipment decreased by $6,131,000. The decline in Industrial Equipment sales was primarily due attributable to the economic conditions that have adversely affected capital expenditures and resulted in an order entry that is more than 20% lower for the first nine months of 2001 compared to the first nine months of 2000. The decline has been most pronounced in Processing Equipment, where projects are competitively bid among several fabricators. Conditions have been extremely competitive for the projects that are available, which has affected profitability. The primary factor affecting Dairy Farm Equipment segment sales for the nine months of 2001 versus 2000 was a backlog at the beginning of 2001 that was 72% lower than the backlog at the beginning of 2000. Additionally, order entry for the first nine months of 2001 has been more than 7% lower than during the first nine months of 2000. Domestic sales of Dairy Farm Equipment were 30% lower for the first nine months of 2001 compared to the first nine months of 2000. The decrease was due to relatively flat milk production due to adverse weather conditions, which have affected production and the quality of feed, and the high cost of cows for herd replacement, which has hampered expansion. Export sales of Dairy Farm Equipment through September 30, 2001, were 36% lower than the same period of a year ago. This was due to the effect of the strong dollar and the foot-and-mouth disease in key European markets. The gross profit rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000 was 18.7% and 22.5%, respectively. The decrease in the gross profit rate was due to the 16% decrease in sales and lower margins. As mentioned above, the economic conditions have had a significant impact on the Industrial Equipment segment, as a reduction in capital expenditures has resulted in fewer projects being available. Consequently, pricing has been extremely competitive and margins have been adversely affected. The gross profit rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, was favorably affected by a reduction of the LIFO reserve of $800,000 due to significantly lower stainless-steel prices. On the other hand, the gross profit rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2000, was adversely affected by an increase in the LIFO reserve of $1,710,000 due to the effect of higher stainless-steel prices. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were lower by 3% for the three quarters ended September 30, 2001 compared to the same period of a year ago. Lower expenditures were incurred for manufacturers' representative commissions, consulting fees, and sales literature. Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, was lower compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2000, as interest income was lower due to a lower level of investable funds. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, varied from the statutory tax rate (34%) primarily due to tax credits. The Registrant's share of the loss from the joint venture for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, was $37,000 compared to income of $33,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2000. The variance in income is due to the economic conditions in Mexico, which are similar to those in the U.S. Consequently, pricing is very competitive and profitability has suffered as a result. The Registrant and the Sheet Metal Workers Union, Local 208, reached agreement on a new labor contract effective April 7, 2001. The new contract covers three years and includes all of the provisions of the Registrant's last and final offer. However, one case involving a minor issue remains pending before the National Labor Relations Board; but management believes, based on an evaluation by counsel, that there is no material financial exposure to the Registrant. |