| UNITED STATES | ||
| SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | ||
| Washington, D.C. 20549 | ||
| FORM N-CSR | ||
| CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED | ||
| MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES | ||
| Investment Company Act file number: (811- 03512) | ||
| Exact name of registrant as specified in charter: Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund | ||
| Address of principal executive offices: One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109 | ||
| Name and address of agent for service: | Beth S. Mazor, Vice President | |
| One Post Office Square | ||
| Boston, Massachusetts 02109 | ||
| Copy to: | John W. Gerstmayr, Esq. | |
| Ropes & Gray LLP | ||
| One International Place | ||
| Boston, Massachusetts 02110 | ||
| Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: | (617) 292-1000 | |
| Date of fiscal year end: July 31, 2008 | ||
| Date of reporting period: August 1, 2007— July 31, 2008 | ||
Item 1. Report to Stockholders:
The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940:
What makes
Putnam different?
A time-honored tradition in money management
Since 1937, our values have been rooted in a profound sense of responsibility for the money entrusted to us.
A prudent approach to investing
We use a research-driven team approach to seek consistent, dependable, superior investment results over time, although there is no guarantee a fund will meet its objectives.
Funds for every investment goal
We offer a broad range of mutual funds and other financial products so investors and their financial representatives can build diversified portfolios.
A commitment to doing what’s right for investors
With a focus on investment performance, below-average expenses, and in-depth information about our funds, we put the interests of investors first and seek to set the standard for integrity and service.
Industry-leading service
We help investors, along with their financial representatives, make informed investment decisions with confidence.
In 1830, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice Samuel Putnam established The Prudent Man Rule, a legal foundation for responsible money management.
THE PRUDENT MAN RULE
All that can be required of a trustee to invest is that he shall conduct himself faithfully and exercise a sound discretion. He is to observe how men of prudence, discretion, and intelligence manage their own affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the permanent disposition of their funds, considering the probable income, as well as the probable safety of the capital to be invested.
Putnam
OTC & Emerging
Growth Fund
7|31|08
Annual Report
| Message from the Trustees | 1 |
| About the fund | 2 |
| Performance and portfolio snapshots | 4 |
| Interview with your fund’s Portfolio Leaders. | 5 |
| Performance in depth | 8 |
| Expenses | 10 |
| Portfolio turnover | 12 |
| Risk | 12 |
| Your fund’s management | 13 |
| Terms and definitions | 14 |
| Trustee approval of management contract | 15 |
| Other information for shareholders | 18 |
| Financial statements | 19 |
| Federal tax information | 32 |
| Brokerage commissions | 32 |
| About the Trustees | 33 |
| Officers | 36 |
Cover photograph: Vineyard, Napa County, California © Charles O’Rear
Message from the Trustees
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
The past 12 months have presented the economy with a growing set of challenges, and financial markets have responded with losses across a wide range of sectors globally. It is always unsettling to see the markets and one’s investment returns declining. Times like these are a reminder of why it is important to keep a long-term perspective, to ensure that your portfolio is well diversified, and to seek the counsel of your financial representative.
At Putnam, we continually strive to offer the best investment returns, innovative products, and award-winning service to our shareholders. In keeping with this tradition, we are pleased to announce that Robert L. Reynolds, a well-known leader and visionary in the mutual fund industry, has joined the Putnam leadership team as President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Investments, effective July 1, 2008. Charles E. Haldeman, Jr., former President and CEO, has taken on the role of Chairman of Putnam Investment Management, LLC, the firm’s fund management company.
Mr. Reynolds brings to Putnam substantial industry experience and an outstanding record of success, including serving as Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer at Fidelity Investments from 2000 to 2007. We look forward to working with Bob as we continue our goal to position Putnam to exceed our shareholders’ expectations.
We would also like to take this opportunity to welcome new shareholders to the fund and to thank all of our investors for your continued confidence in Putnam.
Respectfully yours,
About the fund
Seeking growth from small and midsize companies
Growth stocks are issued by companies that analysts believe are growing faster than the economy overall, or have the potential to do so. Growth in a company’s earnings, for instance, could lead to an increase in its stock price over time. Companies classified as growth candidates can be start-ups or seasoned veterans, and can be found in many industries.
Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund is an aggressive fund that targets the stocks of small and midsize companies. Through intensive research, the fund’s management team looks for businesses that appear to have a leading or proprietary position in a growing industry. The team may also target companies that are gaining market share within an established industry. Smaller companies can be more flexible than larger, more established firms; they can move quickly to develop new products or services that capture a customer base with little or no immediate competition.
Small- and mid-cap stocks react differently to economic conditions than do their large-cap counterparts, so including more than one type in your portfolio is a way to diversify your holdings. Remember, however, that stocks held in an aggressive fund like Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund come with inherent risks, since markets for rapidly growing companies can be volatile.
Unlike larger, blue-chip companies that are carefully tracked by Wall Street analysts, smaller companies often are not subject to close attention. Reduced coverage means that in-house research, like the work of Putnam’s analysts, is key to uncovering companies that are likely to grow over time. Since the fund’s inception in late 1982, Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund’s management team has worked closely with Putnam analysts to uncover opportunities in the small- and mid-cap stock universe that meet their criteria for growth.
This fund invests some or all of its assets in small and/or midsize companies. Such investments increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Stocks with above-average earnings growth may be more volatile, especially if earnings do not continue to grow.
In-depth analysis is key to successful stock selection.
Drawing on the expertise of a dedicated team of stock analysts, the fund’s management team seeks attractive growth stocks. Once a stock is selected for the portfolio, it is regularly assessed by members of the team to ensure that it continues to meet its criteria, including:
Growth They examine each company’s financials, including its sales and earnings, and target those believed to offer growth potential.
Quality They look for high-quality companies, seeking characteristics such as solid management teams, sound business models, a record of strong performance, and high levels of free-cash flow.
Valuation They carefully consider how each stock is valued, seeking stocks whose valuations are attractive relative to the company’s growth potential.
Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund holdings have
spanned many sectors and industries over time.
Performance and portfolio snapshots
Average annual total return (%) comparison as of 7/31/08
Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. Share price, principal value, and return will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance of class A shares assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Fund returns in the bar chart do not reflect a sales charge of 5.75%; had they, returns would have been lower. See pages 5 and 8–9 for additional performance information. For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower. A 1% short-term trading fee may apply. To obtain the most recent month-end performance, visit www.putnam.com.
* The inception date of the Russell 2500 Growth Index was 12/31/85.
“In this difficult market — and in all market
environments, for that matter — we remain
focused on locating companies that we feel can
offer rewarding returns to investors over time.”
Richard Weed, Portfolio Leader, Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund
Allocations are represented as a percentage of net assets and may not equal 100%. Holdings and allocations may vary over time.
Sector allocations as of 7/31/08
4
Thank you, gentlemen, for taking the time today to talk about the fund’s fiscal year. Rick, how did it perform?
Unfortunately, the fund posted a loss during its 2008 fiscal year, lagging both its benchmark and its Lipper peer group. Most of the performance shortfall occurred in the last month of the period. During that time, the prices for many commodities came down from very high levels, with the prices of energy and materials stocks — two of the only areas to escape the market’s downdraft during the preceding months — declining even more than the prices of the underlying commodities. Regretfully, the fund was overweight in the energy and materials sectors, which was the main reason that performance lagged. Capital goods was another sector that hurt performance. While the fund benefited from being underweight in this struggling sector, its holdings there were focused on companies that serve the energy group, so these firms fell in concert with energy stocks. On the positive side, underweighting consumer cyclical stocks buoyed the fund’s relative return.
What strategies did you pursue during the fund’s fiscal year?
Our stock selection process remained consistent, as we focused on the stocks of small and midsize companies, choosing securities by using a combination of bottom-up, fundamental analysis and quantitative computer modeling. By doing so, we feel we consider both forward-looking and historical data to locate attractive investment opportunities.
Companies that attract us look ready to enjoy rapid earnings growth regardless of short-term market fluctuations. The long-term historical business fundamentals that we analyze include earnings growth, earnings quality, and cash flow. We prefer investing in companies offering strong management teams, leadership positions in growing industries, proprietary products, and solid business plans.
The fund’s sector weightings are a by-product of this approach. The portfolio took on a more defensive position as the period came to a close, with growing overweights in health care and consumer staples, two sectors that offer steady earnings growth — a positive attribute during times of market and economic uncertainty.
Broad market index and fund performance
This comparison shows your fund’s performance in the context of broad market indexes for the 12 months ended 7/31/08. See the previous page and pages 8–9 for additional fund performance information. Index descriptions can be found on page 14.
5
Ray, what were some of the positions that detracted from the fund’s relative performance?
NutriSystem — which offers weight-management programs — declined due to the company’s lack of success with its advertising campaign, which caused the company to slash earnings and revenues estimates. We sold off the position in response. Underweighting coal producer Arch Coal also held back fund performance. Coal stocks performed quite well due to a surge in coal prices. PDL BioPharma lagged due to a weak new-product pipeline and because one of its products went off patent. In addition, the stock had been selling at a premium due to sentiment that the company would be sold. However, this premium evaporated as the firm’s attractiveness as a takeout candidate disappeared, and we eliminated our position in this holding by the end of the period. An out-of-benchmark position in Jackson Hewitt Tax Service detracted further. The company serves low-income customers, and was hurt by the softening U.S. economy. Finally, engineering company URS, which focuses on municipal construction and maintenance work, suffered from a pullback in spending by municipalities. We sold our position in this stock by the end of the period.
Which were some of the top contributors?
Respironics, which makes medical devices, including a mask to help correct snoring problems, was purchased at a premium by Phillips, helping performance. We sold this holding for a profit by period-end. Home-health-care provider Amedisys rose on the strength of an acquisition that helped the company improve profit margins much more quickly than expected. An out-of-benchmark position in Helmerich & Payne, which makes technologically advanced land-based oil and natural gas rigs, appreciated due to strong spending on energy exploration and production. Patriot Coal, which was sold by period-end, benefited with other coal producers from the rise in the price of coal, resulting in part from European co untries and companies diversifying away from Russian gas as an energy source. Our investment in steel producer Steel Dynamics also proved fruitful. Even though there has been a significant rise in input costs for the steel industry — particularly the coal used to fuel steel furnaces — this company and others in the group have been able to pass on these price increases to their customers. That’s because the steel industry has become more consolidated, leading to improved price discipline among producers.
Rick, what’s your outlook for the rest of 2008?
It looks tough for the remainder of the year, as the market searches for signs of recovery in the economy. The U.S. consumer — which accounts for two thirds of the gross domestic product (GDP) — is facing slow wage
Top 10 holdings
This table shows the fund’s top 10 holdings and the percentage of the fund’s net assets that each represented as of 7/31/08. Also shown is each holding’s market sector and the specific industry within that sector. Holdings will vary over time.
| HOLDING (percentage of fund’s net assets) | SECTOR | INDUSTRY |
| C.R. Bard, Inc. (2.0%) | Health care | Medical technology |
| Matthews International Corp. (1.4%) | Capital goods | Manufacturing |
| Walter Industries, Inc. (1.3%) | Conglomerates | Conglomerates |
| Equitable Resources, Inc. (1.3%) | Utilities and power | Natural gas utilities |
| AutoZone, Inc. (1.3%) | Consumer cyclicals | Retail |
| Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (1.2%) | Health care | Health-care services |
| Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (1.2%) | Health care | Medical technology |
| West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (1.2%) | Health care | Medical technology |
| Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (1.2%) | Consumer staples | Consumer goods |
| Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. (1.1%) | Basic materials | Forest products and packaging |
6
growth, continued difficulties in the housing sector, and rising food and energy prices. While the global economy has fared better than that of the United States, signs of weakness are beginning to show overseas as well.
In terms of the fund, we anticipate maintaining a relatively defensive stance as a result of this backdrop. Otherwise, our main focus continues to be on what sort of long-term potential is offered by individual companies. We will look to best serve our shareholders’ long-term goals by constructing a diversified portfolio through stock picking backed by rigorous research and analysis. In this difficult market — and in all market environments, for that matter — we remain focused on locating companies that we feel can offer rewarding returns to investors over time.
Thanks for your time and insight today, gentlemen.
The views expressed in this report are exclusively those of Putnam Management. They are not meant as investment advice.
Please note that the holdings discussed in this report may not have been held by the fund for the entire period. Portfolio composition is subject to review in accordance with the fund’s investment strategy and may vary in the future.
I N T H E N E W S
The price of oil began the period at $78 per barrel and rose steadily, reaching a peak of $147 during the day on July 11 before settling back to $145 at the close of that day. From that point, the price of oil fell, finishing July 2008 at $124. Strong global demand and constricted supply were the main drivers of this run-up. In particular, the vibrant economies of the developing world helped spur petroleum prices higher. The main factors behind the recent decline in the price of oil were a rise in the relative value of the U.S. dollar and a downward revision in the consensus projected annual growth in gross domestic product (GDP) in China from about 12% to around 9%. While this rate of growth is still quite strong, the revision surprised the oil markets.
Comparison of top sector weightings
This chart shows how the fund’s top weightings have changed over the past six months. Weightings are shown as a percentage of net assets. Holdings will vary over time.
7
Your fund’s performance
This section shows your fund’s performance, price, and distribution information for periods ended July 31, 2008, the end of its most recent fiscal year. In accordance with regulatory requirements for mutual funds, we also include performance as of the most recent calendar quarter-end and expense information taken from the fund’s current prospectus. Performance should always be considered in light of a fund’s investment strategy. Data represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance information does not reflect any deduction for taxes a shareholder may owe on fund distributions or on the redemption of fund shares. For the most recent month-end performance, please visit the Individual Investors section of www.putna m.com or call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581. Class Y shares are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs. See the Terms and Definitions section in this report for definitions of the share classes offered by your fund.
Fund performance Total return for periods ended 7/31/08
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class R | Class Y | |||||
| (inception dates) | (11/1/82) | (7/15/93) | (7/26/99) | (12/2/94) | (12/1/03) | (7/12/96) | ||||
| NAV | POP | NAV | CDSC | NAV | CDSC | NAV | POP | NAV | NAV | |
| Annual average (life of fund) | 10.08% | 9.83% | 9.18% | 9.18% | 9.27% | 9.27% | 9.45% | 9.30% | 9.80% | 10.23% |
| 10 years | –27.62 | –31.79 | –32.87 | –32.87 | –32.75 | –32.75 | –31.16 | –33.58 | –29.41 | –25.59 |
| Annual average | –3.18 | –3.75 | –3.91 | –3.91 | –3.89 | –3.89 | –3.67 | –4.01 | –3.42 | –2.91 |
| 5 years | 44.21 | 36.00 | 38.84 | 36.84 | 38.89 | 38.89 | 40.66 | 35.73 | 42.35 | 46.11 |
| Annual average | 7.60 | 6.34 | 6.78 | 6.47 | 6.79 | 6.79 | 7.06 | 6.30 | 7.32 | 7.88 |
| 3 years | 15.56 | 8.87 | 13.00 | 10.00 | 13.01 | 13.01 | 13.87 | 9.87 | 14.70 | 16.63 |
| Annual average | 4.94 | 2.87 | 4.16 | 3.23 | 4.16 | 4.16 | 4.42 | 3.19 | 4.68 | 5.26 |
| 1 year | –11.60 | –16.68 | –12.27 | –16.66 | –12.23 | –13.11 | –12.01 | –15.14 | –11.81 | –11.29 |
Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. After sales charge returns (public offering price, or POP) for class A and M shares reflect a maximum 5.75% and 3.50% load, respectively, as of 1/2/08. Class B share returns reflect the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC), which is 5% in the first year, declining to 1% in the sixth year, and is eliminated thereafter. Class C shares reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year that is eliminated thereafter. Class R and Y shares have no initial sales charge or CDSC. Performance for class B, C, M, R, and Y shares before their inception is derived from the historical performance of class A shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge (or CDSC) and, except for class Y shares, the higher operating expenses for such shares.
For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower.
A 1% short-term trading fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 7 days of purchase.
Change in the value of a $10,000 investment ($9,425 after sales charge)
Cumulative total return from 7/31/98 to 7/31/08
Past performance does not indicate future results. At the end of the same time period, a $10,000 investment in the fund’s class B and class C shares would have been valued at $6,713 and $6,725, respectively, and no contingent deferred sales charges would apply. A $10,000 investment in the fund’s class M shares ($9,650 after sales charge) would have been valued at $6,642 at public offering price. A $10,000 investment in the fund’s class R and class Y shares would have been valued at $7,059 and $7,441, respectively.
8
Comparative index returns For periods ended 7/31/08
| Russell 2500 | Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds | |
| Growth Index | category average* | |
| Annual average (life of fund) | —† | 9.87% |
| 10 years | 78.20% | 79.08 |
| Annual average | 5.95 | 5.43 |
| 5 years | 61.82 | 58.71 |
| Annual average | 10.11 | 9.51 |
| 3 years | 15.91 | 15.84 |
| Annual average | 5.04 | 4.88 |
| 1 year | –5.56 | –7.48 |
Index and Lipper results should be compared to fund performance at net asset value.
* Over the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and life-of-fund periods ended 7/31/08 there were 593, 505, 405, 179, and 16 funds, respectively, in this Lipper category.
† The inception date of the Russell 2500 Growth Index was 12/31/85.
Fund price and distribution information For the 12-month period ended 7/31/08
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class R | Class Y | |||
| Share value: | NAV | POP | NAV | NAV | NAV | POP | NAV | NAV |
| 7/31/07 | $10.00 | $10.61* | $8.72 | $9.40 | $9.24 | $9.58* | $9.91 | $10.36 |
| 7/31/08 | 8.84 | 9.38 | 7.65 | 8.25 | 8.13 | 8.42 | 8.74 | 9.19 |
The classification of distributions, if any, is an estimate. Final distribution information will appear on your year-end tax forms.
The fund made no distributions during the period.
* Reflects an increase in sales charges that took effect on 1/2/08.
Fund performance as of most recent calendar quarter Total return for periods ended 6/30/08
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class R | Class Y | |||||
| (inception dates) | (11/1/82) | (7/15/93) | (7/26/99) | (12/2/94) | (12/1/03) | (7/12/96) | ||||
| NAV | POP | NAV | CDSC | NAV | CDSC | NAV | POP | NAV | NAV | |
| Annual average (life of fund) | 10.31% | 10.06% | 9.40% | 9.40% | 9.49% | 9.49% | 9.67% | 9.52% | 10.03% | 10.45% |
| 10 years | –30.22 | –34.24 | –35.29 | –35.29 | –35.23 | –35.23 | –33.61 | –35.94 | –31.89 | –28.27 |
| Annual average | –3.53 | –4.10 | –4.26 | –4.26 | –4.25 | –4.25 | –4.01 | –4.36 | –3.77 | –3.27 |
| 5 years | 56.35 | 47.37 | 50.66 | 48.66 | 50.70 | 50.70 | 52.60 | 47.31 | 54.39 | 58.42 |
| Annual average | 9.35 | 8.06 | 8.54 | 8.25 | 8.55 | 8.55 | 8.82 | 8.06 | 9.07 | 9.64 |
| 3 years | 26.40 | 19.07 | 23.65 | 20.65 | 23.67 | 23.67 | 24.63 | 20.23 | 25.55 | 27.49 |
| Annual average | 8.12 | 5.99 | 7.33 | 6.46 | 7.34 | 7.34 | 7.62 | 6.33 | 7.88 | 8.43 |
| 1 year | –10.90 | –16.00 | –11.60 | –16.02 | –11.59 | –12.47 | –11.37 | –14.49 | –11.09 | –10.61 |
Fund’s annual operating expenses For the fiscal year ended 7/31/07
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class R | Class Y | |
| Net expenses* | 1.42% | 2.17% | 2.17% | 1.92% | 1.67% | 1.17% |
| Total annual fund operating expenses | 1.48% | 2.23% | 2.23% | 1.98% | 1.73% | 1.23% |
* Reflects Putnam Management’s decision to contractually limit its expenses through 7/31/08.
Expense information in this table is taken from the most recent prospectus, is subject to change, and may differ from that shown in the next section and in the financial highlights of this report. Expenses are shown as a percentage of average net assets.
9
Your fund’s expenses
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees, distribution fees (12b-1 fees), and other expenses. In the most recent six-month period, your fund limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. Using the following information, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. You may also pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial representative.
Review your fund’s expenses
The following table shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund from February 1, 2008, to July 31, 2008. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class R | Class Y | |
| Expenses paid per $1,000* | $6.73 | $10.37 | $10.38 | $9.17 | $7.95 | $5.52 |
| Ending value (after expenses) | $961.90 | $958.60 | $959.30 | $961.00 | $961.50 | $964.30 |
* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 7/31/08. The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.
Estimate the expenses you paid
To estimate the ongoing expenses you paid for the six months ended July 31, 2008, use the following calculation method. To find the value of your investment on February 1, 2008, call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.
Compare expenses using the SEC’s method
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the following table shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total costs) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class R | Class Y | |
| Expenses paid per $1,000* | $6.92 | $10.67 | $10.67 | $9.42 | $8.17 | $5.67 |
| Ending value (after expenses) | $1,018.00 | $1,014.27 | $1,014.27 | $1,015.51 | $1,016.76 | $1,019.24 |
* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 7/31/08. The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.
10
Compare expenses using industry averages
You can also compare your fund’s expenses with the average of its peer group, as defined by Lipper, an independent fund-rating agency that ranks funds relative to others that Lipper considers to have similar investment styles or objectives. The expense ratio for each share class shown indicates how much of your fund’s average net assets have been used to pay ongoing expenses during the period.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class R | Class Y | |
| Your fund’s annualized expense ratio* | 1.38% | 2.13% | 2.13% | 1.88% | 1.63% | 1.13% |
| Average annualized expense ratio for Lipper peer group† | 1.41% | 2.16% | 2.16% | 1.91% | 1.66% | 1.16% |
| * For the fund’s most recent fiscal half year; may differ from expense ratios based on one-year data in the financial highlights. | ||||||
† Putnam keeps fund expenses below the Lipper peer group average expense ratio by limiting our fund expenses if they exceed the Lipper average. The Lipper average is a simple average of front-end load funds in the peer group that excludes 12b-1 fees as well as any expense offset and brokerage/service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses. To facilitate the comparison in this presentation, Putnam has adjusted the Lipper average to reflect 12b-1 fees. Investors should note that the other funds in the peer group may be significantly smaller or larger than the fund, and that an asset-weighted average would likely be lower than the simple average. Also, the fund and Lipper report expense data at different times; the fund’s expense ratio shown here is annualized data for the most recent six-month period, while the quarterly updated Lipper average is based on the most recent fiscal year-end data available for the peer grou p funds as of 6/30/08.
11
Your fund’s portfolio turnover and Morningstar® Risk
Putnam funds are actively managed by teams of experts who buy and sell securities based on intensive analysis of companies, industries, economies, and markets. Portfolio turnover is a measure of how often a fund’s managers buy and sell securities for your fund. A portfolio turnover of 100%, for example, means that the managers sold and replaced securities valued at 100% of a fund’s average portfolio value within a given period. Funds with high turnover may be more likely to generate capital gains that must be distributed to shareholders as taxable income. High turnover may also cause a fund to pay more brokerage commissions and other transaction costs, which may detract from performance.
You can use the following table to compare your fund’s turnover with the average turnover for funds in its Lipper category.
Turnover comparisons
Percentage of holdings that change every year
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |
| Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund | 184% | 115% | 130% | 163% | 63% |
| Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds category average | 111% | 108% | 110% | 115% | 130% |
Turnover data for the fund is calculated based on the fund’s fiscal-year period, which ends on July 31. Turnover data for the fund’s Lipper category is calculated based on the average of the turnover of each fund in the category for its fiscal year ended during the indicated year. Fiscal years vary across funds in the Lipper category, which may limit the comparability of the fund’s portfolio turnover rate to the Lipper average. Comparative data for 2008 is based on information available as of 7/31/08.
Your fund’s Morningstar® Risk
This risk comparison is designed to help you understand how your fund compares with other funds. The comparison utilizes a risk measure developed by Morningstar, an independent fund-rating agency. This risk measure is referred to as the fund’s Morningstar Risk.
Your fund’s Morningstar Risk is shown alongside that of the average fund in its Morningstar category. The risk bar broadens the comparison by translating the fund’s Morningstar Risk into a percentile, which is based on the fund’s ranking among all funds rated by Morningstar as of June 30, 2008. A higher Morningstar Risk generally indicates that a fund’s monthly returns have varied more widely.
Morningstar determines a fund’s Morningstar Risk by assessing variations in the fund’s monthly returns — with an emphasis on downside variations — over a 3-year period, if available. Those measures are weighted and averaged to produce the fund’s Morningstar Risk. The information shown is provided for the fund’s class A shares only; information for other classes may vary. Morningstar Risk is based on historical data and does not indicate future results. Morningstar does not purport to measure the risk associated with a current investment in a fund, either on an absolute basis or on a relative basis. Low Morningstar Risk does not mean that you cannot lose money on an investment in a fund. Copyright 2008 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete, or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information.
12
Your fund’s management
Your fund is managed by the members of the Putnam Small and Emerging Growth Team. Raymond Haddad and Richard Weed are the Portfolio Leaders of your fund. The Portfolio Leaders coordinate the team’s management of the fund.
For a complete listing of the members of the Putnam Small and Emerging Growth Team, including those who are not Portfolio Leaders or Portfolio Members of your fund, please visit the Individual Investors section of www.putnam.com.
Trustee and Putnam employee fund ownership
As of July 31, 2008, all of the Trustees of the Putnam funds owned fund shares. The table below shows the approximate value of investments in the fund and all Putnam funds as of that date by the Trustees and Putnam employees. These amounts include investments by the Trustees’ and employees’ immediate family members and investments through retirement and deferred compensation plans.
| Assets in | Total assets in | |
| the fund | all Putnam funds | |
| Trustees | $275,000 | $76,000,000 |
| Putnam employees | $6,403,000 | $568,000,000 |
Other Putnam funds managed by the Portfolio Leaders
Raymond Haddad is also a Portfolio Leader of Putnam Vista Fund and Putnam New Opportunities Fund, and a Portfolio Member of Putnam Discovery Growth Fund.
Richard Weed is also a Portfolio Leader of Putnam Discovery Growth Fund and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund, and a Portfolio Member of Putnam New Opportunities Fund.
Raymond Haddad and Richard Weed may also manage other accounts and variable trust funds advised by Putnam Management or an affiliate.
Changes in your fund’s Portfolio Leaders
During the reporting period ended July 31, 2008, Raymond Haddad, previously a Portfolio Member, became a Portfolio Leader of your fund.
Investment team fund ownership
The following table shows how much the fund’s current Portfolio Leaders have invested in the fund and in all Putnam mutual funds (in dollar ranges). Information shown is as of July 31, 2008, and July 31, 2007.
13
Terms and definitions
Important terms
Total return shows how the value of the fund’s shares changed over time, assuming you held the shares through the entire period and reinvested all distributions in the fund.
Net asset value (NAV) is the price, or value, of one share of a mutual fund, without a sales charge. NAVs fluctuate with market conditions. NAV is calculated by dividing the net assets of each class of shares by the number of outstanding shares in the class.
Public offering price (POP) is the price of a mutual fund share plus the maximum sales charge levied at the time of purchase. POP performance figures shown here assume the 5.75% maximum sales charge for class A shares and 3.50% for class M shares.
Contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) is generally a charge applied at the time of the redemption of class B or C shares and assumes redemption at the end of the period. Your fund’s class B CDSC declines from a 5% maximum during the first year to 1% during the sixth year. After the sixth year, the CDSC no longer applies. The CDSC for class C shares is 1% for one year after purchase.
Share classes
Class A shares are generally subject to an initial sales charge and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).
Class B shares are not subject to an initial sales charge. They may be subject to a CDSC.
Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge and are subject to a CDSC only if the shares are redeemed during the first year.
Class M shares have a lower initial sales charge and a higher 12b-1 fee than class A shares and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).
Class R shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC and are available only to certain defined contribution plans.
Class Y shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC, and carry no 12b-1 fee. They are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs.
Comparative indexes
Lehman Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. investment-grade fixed-income securities.
Merrill Lynch 91-Day Treasury Bill Index is an unmanaged index that seeks to measure the performance of U.S. Treasury bills available in the marketplace.
Russell 2500 Growth Index is an unmanaged index of those companies in the small/ mid-cap Russell 2500 Index chosen for their growth orientation.
S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.
Indexes assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not account for fees. Securities and performance of a fund and an index will differ. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Lipper is a third-party industry-ranking entity that ranks mutual funds. Its rankings do not reflect sales charges. Lipper rankings are based on total return at net asset value relative to other funds that have similar current investment styles or objectives as determined by Lipper. Lipper may change a fund’s category assignment at its discretion. Lipper category averages reflect performance trends for funds within a category.
14
Trustee approval of management contract
General conclusions
The Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds oversees the management of each fund and, as required by law, determines annually whether to approve the continuance of your fund’s management contract with Putnam Investment Management (“Putnam Management”). In this regard, the Board of Trustees, with the assistance of its Contract Committee consisting solely of Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as such term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the Putnam funds (the “Independent Trustees”), requests and evaluates all information it deems reasonably necessary under the circumstances. Over the course of several months ending in June 2008, the Contract Committee met several times to consider the information provided by Putnam Management and other information developed with the assistance of the Board’s independent counsel and independent staff. The Contract Committee reviewed and discussed key aspects of t his information with all of the Independent Trustees. The Contract Committee recommended, and the Independent Trustees approved, the continuance of your fund’s management contract, effective July 1, 2008.
The Independent Trustees’ approval was based on the following conclusions:
• That the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the services being provided to the fund, the fees paid by competitive funds and the costs incurred by Putnam Management in providing such services, and
• That this fee schedule represented an appropriate sharing between fund shareholders and Putnam Management of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the fund at current asset levels.
These conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees, were subject to the continued application of certain expense reductions and waivers and other considerations noted below, and were not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations and how the Trustees considered these factors are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for your fund and the other Putnam funds are the result of many years of review and discussion between the Independent Trustees and Putnam Management, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements in prior years.
Management fee schedules and categories; total expenses
The Trustees reviewed the management fee schedules in effect for all Putnam funds, including fee levels and breakpoints, and the assignment of funds to particular fee categories. In reviewing fees and expenses, the Trustees generally focused their attention on material changes in circumstances — for example, changes in a fund’s size or investment style, changes in Putnam Management’s operating costs or responsibilities, or changes in competitive practices in the mutual fund industry — that suggest that consideration of fee changes might be warranted. The Trustees concluded that the circumstances did not warrant changes to the management fee structure of your fund, which had been carefully developed over the years, re-examined on many occasions and adjusted where appropriate. In this regard, the Trustees also noted that shareholders of your fund voted in 2007 to approve new management contracts containing an identical fee structure. The Trustees focuse d on two areas of particular interest, as discussed further below:
• Competitiveness. The Trustees reviewed comparative fee and expense information for competitive funds, which indicated that, in a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc., your fund ranked in the 28th percentile in management fees and in the 62nd percentile in total expenses (less any applicable 12b-1 fees) as of December 31, 2007 (the first percentile being the least expensive funds and the 100th percentile being the most expensive funds). (Because the fund’s custom peer group is smaller than the fund’s broad Lipper Inc. peer group, this expense information may differ from the Lipper peer expense information found elsewhere in this report.) The Trustees noted that expense ratios for a number of Putnam funds, which show the percentage of fund assets used to pay for management and administrative services, distribution (12b-1) fees and other expenses, had been increasing recently as a result of declining net assets and the natural operation of fee breakpoints.
The Trustees noted that the expense ratio increases described above were currently being controlled by expense limitations initially implemented in January 2004. The Trustees have received a commitment from Putnam Management and its parent company to continue this program through at least June 30, 2009. These expense limitations give effect to a commitment by Putnam Management that the expense ratio of each open-end fund would be no higher than the average expense ratio of the competitive funds included in the fund’s relevant Lipper universe (exclusive of any applicable 12b-1 charges in each case). The Trustees observed that this commitment to limit fund expenses has served shareholders well since its inception.
In order to ensure that the expenses of the Putnam funds continue to meet evolving competitive standards, the Trustees requested, and Putnam Management agreed, to extend for the twelve months beginning July 1, 2008, an additional expense limitation for certain funds at an amount equal to the average expense ratio (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) of a custom
15
peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper to correspond to the size of the fund. This additional expense limitation will be applied to those open-end funds that had above-average expense ratios (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) based on the custom peer group data for the period ended December 31, 2007. This additional expense limitation will be applied to your fund.
In addition, the Trustees devoted particular attention to analyzing the Putnam funds’ fees and expenses relative to those of competitors in fund complexes of comparable size and with a comparable mix of asset categories. The Trustees concluded that this analysis did not reveal any mattersrequiring further attention at the current time.
• Economies of scale. Your fund currently has the benefit of breakpoints in its management fee that provide shareholders with significant economies of scale, which means that the effective management fee rate of the fund (as a percentage of fund assets) declines as the fund grows in size and crosses specified asset thresholds. Conversely, if the fund shrinks in size — as has been the case for many Putnam funds in recent years — these breakpoints result in increasing fee levels. In recent years, the Trustees have examined the operation of the existing breakpoint structure during periods of both growth and decline in asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented an appropriate sharing of economies of scale at current asset levels.
In connection with their review of the management fees and total expenses of the Putnam funds, the Trustees also reviewed the costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by Putnam Management and its affiliates from the relationship with the funds. This information included trends in revenues, expenses and profitability of Putnam Management and its affiliates relating to the investment management and distribution services provided to the funds. In this regard, the Trustees also reviewed an analysis of Putnam Management’s revenues, expenses and profitability with respect to the funds’ management contracts, allocated on a fund-by-fund basis.
Investment performance
The quality of the investment process provided by Putnam Management represented a major factor in the Trustees’ evaluation of the quality of services provided by Putnam Management under your fund’s management contract. The Trustees were assisted in their review of the Putnam funds’ investment process and performance by the work of the Investment Oversight Coordinating Committee of the Trustees and the Investment Oversight Committees of the Trustees, which had met on a regular monthly basis with the funds’ portfolio teams throughout the year. The Trustees concluded that Putnam Management generally provides a high-quality investment process — as measured by the experience and skills of the individuals assigned to the management of fund portfolios, the resources made available to such personnel, and in general the ability of Putnam Management to attract and retain high-quality personnel — but also recognized that this does not guarantee favorab le investment results for every fund in every time period. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each fund over multiple time periods and considered information comparing each fund’s performance with various benchmarks and with the performance of competitive funds.
While the Trustees noted the satisfactory investment performance of certain Putnam funds, they considered the disappointing investment performance of many funds in recent periods, particularly over periods in 2007 and 2008. They discussed with senior management of Putnam Management the factors contributing to such underperformance and actions being taken to improve performance. The Trustees recognized that, in recent years, Putnam Management has taken steps to strengthen its investment personnel and processes to address areas of underperformance, including recent efforts to further centralize Putnam Management’s equity research function. In this regard, the Trustees took into consideration efforts by Putnam Management to improve its ability to assess and mitigate investment risk in individual funds, across asset classes, and across the complex as a whole. The Trustees indicated their intention to continue to monitor performance trends to assess the effectiveness of these efforts and to evaluate whether additional changes to address areas of underperformance are warranted.
In the case of your fund, the Trustees considered that your fund’s class A share cumulative total return performance at net asset value was in the following percentiles of its Lipper Inc. peer group (Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds) for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007 (the first percentile being the best-performing funds and the 100th percentile being the worst-performing funds):
| One-year period | 68th |
| Three-year period | 56th |
| Five-year period | 67th |
(Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods shown elsewhere in this report.) Over the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007, there were 601, 487, and 404 funds, respectively, in your fund’s Lipper peer group.* Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.
* The percentile rankings for your fund’s class A share annualized total return performance in the Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds category for the one-year, five-year, and ten-year periods ended June 30, 2008, were 73%, 73%, and 99%, respectively. Over the one-year, five-year, and ten-year periods ended June 30, 2008, your fund ranked 434th out of 596, 296th out of 408, and 179th out of 181 funds, respectively. Note that this more recent information was not available when the Trustees approved the continuance of your fund’s management contract.
16
As a general matter, the Trustees believe that cooperative efforts between the Trustees and Putnam Management represent the most effective way to address investment performance problems. The Trustees noted that investors in the Putnam funds have, in effect, placed their trust in the Putnam organization, under the oversight of the funds’ Trustees, to make appropriate decisions regarding the management of the funds. Based on the responsiveness of Putnam Management in the recent past to Trustee concerns about investment performance, the Trustees concluded that it is preferable to seek change within Put-nam Management to address performance shortcomings. In the Trustees’ view, the alternative of engaging a new investment adviser for an underperforming fund would entail significant disruptions and would not provide any greater assurance of improved investment performance.
Brokerage and soft-dollar
allocations; other benefits
The Trustees considered various potential benefits that Putnam Management may receive in connection with the services it provides under the management contract with your fund. These include benefits related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research services that may be useful to Putnam Management in managing the assets of the fund and of other clients. The Trustees considered changes made in 2008, at Putnam Management’s request, to the Putnam funds’ brokerage allocation policy, which expanded the permitted categories of brokerage and research services payable with soft dollars and increased the permitted soft dollar allocation to third-party services over what had been authorized in previous years. The Trustees indicated their continued intent to monitor the potential benefits associated with the allocation of fund brokerage and trend s in industry practice to ensure that the principle of seeking “best price and execution” remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
The Trustees’ annual review of your fund’s management contract arrangements also included the review of its distributor’s contract and distribution plan with Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership and the investor servicing agreement with Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), each of which provides benefits to affiliates of Putnam Management. In the case of the investor servicing agreement, the Trustees considered that certain shareholder servicing functions were shifted to a third-party service provider by PFTC in 2007.
Comparison of retail and
institutional fee schedules
The information examined by the Trustees as part of their annual contract review has included for many years information regarding fees charged by Putnam Management and its affiliates to institutional clients such as defined benefit pension plans, college endowments, etc. This information included comparisons of such fees with fees charged to the funds, as well as a detailed assessment of the differences in the services provided to these two types of clients. The Trustees observed, in this regard, that the differences in fee rates between institutional clients and mutual funds are by no means uniform when examined by individual asset sectors, suggesting that differences in the pricing of investment management services to these types of clients reflect to a substantial degree historical competitive forces operating in separate market places. The Trustees considered the fact that fee rates across different asset classes are typically higher o n average for mutual funds than for institutional clients, as well as the differences between the services that Putnam Management provides to the Putnam funds and those that it provides to institutional clients of the firm, but did not rely on such comparisons to any significant extent in concluding that the management fees paid by your fund are reasonable.
17
Other information for shareholders
Putnam’s policy on confidentiality
In order to conduct business with our shareholders, we must obtain certain personal information such as account holders’ addresses, telephone numbers, Social Security numbers, and the names of their financial representatives. We use this information to assign an account number and to help us maintain accurate records of transactions and account balances. It is our policy to protect the confidentiality of your information, whether or not you currently own shares of our funds, and, in particular, not to sell information about you or your accounts to outside marketing firms. We have safeguards in place designed to prevent unauthorized access to our computer systems and procedures to protect personal information from unauthorized use. Under certain circumstances, we share this information with outside vendors who provide services to us, such as mailing and proxy solicitation. In those cases, the service providers enter into confidentiality agreements with us, and we provide only the information necessary to process transactions and perform other services related to your account. We may also share this information with our Putnam affiliates to service your account or provide you with information about other Putnam products or services. It is also our policy to share account information with your financial representative, if you’ve listed one on your Putnam account. If you would like clarification about our confidentiality policies or have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact us at 1-800-225-1581, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., or Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
Proxy voting
Putnam is committed to managing our mutual funds in the best interests of our shareholders. The Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures, as well as information regarding how your fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2008, are available in the Individual Investors section of www.putnam.com, and on the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. If you have questions about finding forms on the SEC’s Web site, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain the Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures at no charge by calling Putnam’s Shareholder Services at 1-800-225-1581.
Fund portfolio holdings
The fund will file a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may obtain the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about the SEC’s Web site or the operation of the Public Reference Room.
18
Financial statements
These sections of the report, as well as the accompanying Notes, preceded by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, constitute the fund’s financial statements.
The fund’s portfolio lists all the fund’s investments and their values as of the last day of the reporting period. Holdings are organized by asset type and industry sector, country, or state to show areas of concentration and diversification.
Statement of assets and liabilities shows how the fund’s net assets and share price are determined. All investment and noninvestment assets are added together. Any unpaid expenses and other liabilities are subtracted from this total. The result is divided by the number of shares to determine the net asset value per share, which is calculated separately for each class of shares. (For funds with preferred shares, the amount subtracted from total assets includes the liquidation preference of preferred shares.)
Statement of operations shows the fund’s net investment gain or loss. This is done by first adding up all the fund’s earnings — from dividends and interest income — and subtracting its operating expenses to determine net investment income (or loss). Then, any net gain or loss the fund realized on the sales of its holdings — as well as any unrealized gains or losses over the period — is added to or subtracted from the net investment result to determine the fund’s net gain or loss for the fiscal year.
Statement of changes in net assets shows how the fund’s net assets were affected by the fund’s net investment gain or loss, by distributions to shareholders, and by changes in the number of the fund’s shares. It lists distributions and their sources (net investment income or realized capital gains) over the current reporting period and the most recent fiscal year-end. The distributions listed here may not match the sources listed in the Statement of operations because the distributions are determined on a tax basis and may be paid in a different period from the one in which they were earned.
Financial highlights provide an overview of the fund’s investment results, per-share distributions, expense ratios, net investment income ratios, and portfolio turnover in one summary table, reflecting the five most recent reporting periods. In a semi-annual report, the highlight table also includes the current reporting period.
19
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Trustees and Shareholders of
Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund:
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the fund’s portfolio, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund (the “fund”) at July 31, 2008, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Tho se standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of investments owned at July 31, 2008 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
September 11, 2008
20
The fund’s portfolio 7/31/08
| COMMON STOCKS (95.7%)* | Shares | Value |
| Automotive (1.0%) | ||
| Copart, Inc. † | 56,900 | $2,495,634 |
| Exide Technologies † | 162,800 | 2,572,240 |
| 5,067,874 | ||
| Banking (0.2%) | ||
| Capitol Federal Financial | 29,151 | 1,178,866 |
| 1,178,866 | ||
| Beverage (1.0%) | ||
| Molson Coors Brewing Co. Class B S | 90,400 | 4,878,888 |
| 4,878,888 | ||
| Biotechnology (2.6%) | ||
| eResearch Technology, Inc. † | 136,789 | 1,991,648 |
| Illumina, Inc. † | 24,501 | 2,284,473 |
| Martek Biosciences Corp. † S | 116,200 | 4,370,282 |
| Medicines Co. † S | 171,400 | 3,806,794 |
| 12,453,197 | ||
| Chemicals (4.2%) | ||
| Airgas, Inc. | 53,900 | 3,087,392 |
| Celanese Corp. Ser. A | 53,800 | 2,072,914 |
| CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 19,300 | 3,154,778 |
| Fertilizantes Fosfatados SA (Preference) (Brazil) | 43,000 | 2,808,298 |
| FMC Corp. S | 50,700 | 3,770,559 |
| Sigma-Adrich Corp. S | 70,900 | 4,306,466 |
| Terra Industries, Inc. | 24,300 | 1,312,200 |
| 20,512,607 | ||
| Coal (1.9%) | ||
| Arch Coal, Inc. | 72,300 | 4,071,213 |
| Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. | 28,700 | 1,704,780 |
| Massey Energy Co. | 49,320 | 3,662,010 |
| 9,438,003 | ||
| Commercial and Consumer Services (3.4%) | ||
| Brink’s Co. (The) | 41,500 | 2,861,840 |
| Forrester Research, Inc. † | 74,200 | 2,500,540 |
| Gartner, Inc. † | 114,800 | 2,796,528 |
| H&R Block, Inc. | 197,200 | 4,797,876 |
| Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. Class A | 61,400 | 3,557,516 |
| 16,514,300 | ||
| Communications Equipment (1.8%) | ||
| F5 Networks, Inc. † | 169,300 | 4,935,095 |
| Harris Corp. S | 75,782 | 3,648,903 |
| 8,583,998 | ||
| Computers (2.7%) | ||
| ANSYS, Inc. † S | 95,382 | 4,376,126 |
| NCR Corp. † | 170,900 | 4,590,374 |
| Solera Holdings, Inc. † | 148,500 | 4,305,015 |
| 13,271,515 | ||
| Conglomerates (2.8%) | ||
| AMETEK, Inc. | 81,300 | 3,891,018 |
| SPX Corp. | 30,000 | 3,803,400 |
| Walter Industries, Inc. | 58,500 | 6,134,895 |
| 13,829,313 | ||
| Consumer Goods (1.2%) | ||
| Church & Dwight Co., Inc. S | 104,600 | 5,739,402 |
| 5,739,402 | ||
| Distribution (0.4%) | ||
| Spartan Stores, Inc. | 85,800 | 2,041,182 |
| 2,041,182 | ||
| Electric Utilities (0.4%) | ||
| PNM Resources, Inc. S | 149,900 | 1,755,329 |
| 1,755,329 | ||
| Electrical Equipment (0.6%) | ||
| GrafTech International, Ltd. † | 114,300 | 2,680,335 |
| 2,680,335 | ||
| COMMON STOCKS (95.7%)* cont. | Shares | Value |
| Electronics (4.6%) | ||
| Altera Corp. S | 180,700 | $3,966,365 |
| Amphenol Corp. Class A | 104,900 | 5,000,583 |
| Analog Devices, Inc. | 58,300 | 1,778,733 |
| Badger Meter, Inc. S | 67,100 | 3,779,743 |
| Itron, Inc. † S | 33,800 | 3,120,754 |
| Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. (Bermuda) † | 98,400 | 1,455,336 |
| Xilinx, Inc. S | 139,000 | 3,451,370 |
| 22,552,884 | ||
| Energy (Oil Field) (6.1%) | ||
| BJ Services Co. | 96,700 | 2,842,980 |
| Cameron International Corp. † S | 101,100 | 4,828,536 |
| Core Laboratories NV (Netherlands) | 29,900 | 3,875,339 |
| Dril-Quip, Inc. † | 55,000 | 2,977,700 |
| FMC Technologies, Inc. † | 60,200 | 3,719,156 |
| Hercules Offshore, Inc. † | 128,693 | 3,213,464 |
| Oceaneering International, Inc. † | 69,300 | 4,202,352 |
| Smith International, Inc. S | 57,600 | 4,284,288 |
| 29,943,815 | ||
| Energy (Other) (1.3%) | ||
| Covanta Holding Corp. † | 152,400 | 4,288,536 |
| First Solar, Inc. † S | 4,900 | 1,397,039 |
| Optisolar, Inc. (acquired 7/30/08, cost $768,199) | ||
| Private) ‡ † F | 123,903 | 768,199 |
| 6,453,774 | ||
| Engineering & Construction (1.3%) | ||
| Fluor Corp. | 50,000 | 4,067,500 |
| McDermott International, Inc. (Panama) † | 45,000 | 2,145,150 |
| 6,212,650 | ||
| Environmental (0.3%) | ||
| Energy Recovery, Inc. † S | 148,837 | 1,644,649 |
| 1,644,649 | ||
| Food (2.6%) | ||
| Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. S | 100,700 | 3,816,530 |
| Companhia Brasileira de Distribuicao Grupo | ||
| Pao de Acucar ADR (Brazil) S | 107,500 | 4,954,675 |
| H.J. Heinz Co. | 81,300 | 4,095,894 |
| 12,867,099 | ||
| Forest Products and Packaging (1.1%) | ||
| Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. (R) S | 112,200 | 5,466,384 |
| 5,466,384 | ||
| Health Care Services (5.1%) | ||
| Amedisys, Inc. † S | 60,600 | 3,885,672 |
| Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. † | 89,600 | 5,954,816 |
| Community Health Systems, Inc. † | 63,200 | 2,084,336 |
| Express Scripts, Inc. † | 37,600 | 2,652,304 |
| Omnicare, Inc. | 100,300 | 2,952,832 |
| Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. | 63,200 | 2,410,448 |
| Tenet Healthcare Corp. † | 605,300 | 3,504,687 |
| Warner Chilcott, Ltd. Class A (Bermuda) † | 72,100 | 1,219,211 |
| 24,664,306 | ||
| Insurance (0.9%) | ||
| American Physicians Capital, Inc. | 8,438 | 420,044 |
| AON Corp. | 54,400 | 2,491,520 |
| FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. † | 30,097 | 1,503,345 |
| 4,414,909 | ||
| Machinery (1.8%) | ||
| AGCO Corp. † | 37,100 | 2,220,435 |
| Bucyrus International, Inc. Class A | 29,700 | 2,079,297 |
| Joy Global, Inc. | 63,000 | 4,549,860 |
| 8,849,592 | ||
21
| COMMON STOCKS (95.7%)* cont. | Shares | Value |
| Manufacturing (2.2%) | ||
| Flowserve Corp. | 27,200 | $3,626,848 |
| Matthews International Corp. | 138,005 | 6,887,830 |
| 10,514,678 | ||
| Medical Technology (8.3%) | ||
| C.R. Bard, Inc. | 103,600 | 9,618,224 |
| Datascope Corp. | 66,100 | 3,085,548 |
| Haemonetics Corp. † | 54,800 | 3,181,688 |
| Luminex Corp. † S | 150,600 | 3,313,200 |
| Masimo Corp. † | 73,200 | 2,764,764 |
| PerkinElmer, Inc. | 121,300 | 3,529,830 |
| Steris Corp. | 85,600 | 2,924,952 |
| Varian Medical Systems, Inc. † S | 98,600 | 5,916,000 |
| West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | 127,500 | 5,854,800 |
| Zoll Medical Corp. † | 17,402 | 548,163 |
| 40,737,169 | ||
| Metal Fabricators (0.2%) | ||
| Mueller Industries, Inc. | 33,211 | 852,526 |
| 852,526 | ||
| Metals (3.7%) | ||
| Agnico-Eagle Mines, Ltd. (Canada) S | 42,000 | 2,295,300 |
| AK Steel Holding Corp. | 42,600 | 2,705,100 |
| Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. S | 35,300 | 3,826,873 |
| PAN American Silver Corp. (Canada) † | 41,500 | 1,284,425 |
| Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 30,600 | 1,932,696 |
| Southern Copper Corp. S | 25,700 | 713,946 |
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 133,600 | 4,232,448 |
| Yamana Gold, Inc. (Canada) | 86,700 | 1,072,479 |
| 18,063,267 | ||
| Natural Gas Utilities (1.8%) | ||
| Equitable Resources, Inc. S | 117,400 | 6,134,150 |
| Questar Corp. | 54,000 | 2,855,520 |
| 8,989,670 | ||
| Oil & Gas (3.4%) | ||
| Denbury Resources, Inc. † S | 110,900 | 3,120,726 |
| Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 49,900 | 2,950,587 |
| OGX Petroleo E Gas Participa (Brazil) † | 16 | 7,878 |
| Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. S | 69,569 | 1,977,151 |
| Range Resources Corp. | 20,100 | 976,056 |
| Rex Energy Corp. † | 159,373 | 3,171,523 |
| Southwestern Energy Co. † | 114,500 | 4,157,495 |
| 16,361,416 | ||
| Pharmaceuticals (3.1%) | ||
| Cephalon, Inc. † S | 33,500 | 2,450,860 |
| Owens & Minor, Inc. S | 118,600 | 5,446,112 |
| Perrigo Co. S | 119,400 | 4,206,462 |
| Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. † S | 104,000 | 3,006,640 |
| 15,110,074 | ||
| Publishing (0.7%) | ||
| Marvel Entertainment, Inc. † S | 98,100 | 3,404,070 |
| 3,404,070 | ||
| Real Estate (4.4%) | ||
| BRE Properties R | 65,300 | 3,191,864 |
| Cyrela Brazil Realty SA (Brazil) | 260,300 | 3,800,000 |
| Gafisa SA ADR (Brazil) S | 122,600 | 4,197,824 |
| HCP, Inc. R | 88,800 | 3,203,016 |
| Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. R | 102,400 | 3,800,064 |
| Realex Properties Corp. (Canada) | 26,838 | 30,167 |
| Vornado Realty Trust R | 33,200 | 3,156,324 |
| 21,379,259 | ||
| Restaurants (0.7%) | ||
| Burger King Holdings, Inc. | 130,700 | 3,506,681 |
| 3,506,681 | ||
| COMMON STOCKS (95.7%)* cont. | Shares | Value |
| Retail (5.6%) | ||
| Aeropostale, Inc. † S | 57,300 | $1,847,925 |
| AutoZone, Inc. † | 47,000 | 6,123,630 |
| Buckle, Inc. (The) S | 33,700 | 1,734,539 |
| Cash America International, Inc. | 60,700 | 2,559,112 |
| Dress Barn, Inc. † | 101,884 | 1,643,389 |
| GOME Electrical Appliances Holdings, Ltd. | ||
| (Hong Kong) | 1,864,000 | 777,582 |
| NBTY, Inc. † | 13,254 | 457,130 |
| Rent-A-Center, Inc. † | 148,800 | 3,154,560 |
| TJX Cos., Inc. (The) | 124,200 | 4,186,782 |
| Urban Outfitters, Inc. † | 66,300 | 2,188,563 |
| Wolverine World Wide, Inc. S | 102,900 | 2,750,517 |
| 27,423,729 | ||
| Schools (1.7%) | ||
| Apollo Group, Inc. Class A † | 50,300 | 3,133,187 |
| DeVry, Inc. | 91,600 | 5,203,796 |
| UNEXT.com, LLC (acquired 4/14/00, cost | ||
| $10,451,238) (Private) ‡ † F | 125,000 | 1,250 |
| 8,338,233 | ||
| Shipping (1.0%) | ||
| Kirby Corp. † | 46,400 | 2,214,208 |
| Ryder System, Inc. | 40,100 | 2,644,996 |
| 4,859,204 | ||
| Software (3.5%) | ||
| Activision Blizzard, Inc. † | 128,800 | 4,634,224 |
| BMC Software, Inc. † | 69,700 | 2,292,433 |
| Mantech International Corp. Class A † | 57,100 | 3,188,464 |
| Red Hat, Inc. † S | 177,300 | 3,790,674 |
| Sybase, Inc. † S | 97,900 | 3,290,419 |
| 17,196,214 | ||
| Staffing (0.8%) | ||
| Hewitt Associates, Inc. Class A † | 99,000 | 3,648,150 |
| 3,648,150 | ||
| Technology (0.8%) | ||
| Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. Class A † | 81,500 | 3,928,300 |
| 3,928,300 | ||
| Technology Services (1.7%) | ||
| Asiainfo Holdings, Inc. (China) † | 157,700 | 2,171,529 |
| SAIC, Inc. † | 172,400 | 3,256,636 |
| Salesforce.com, Inc. † S | 45,700 | 2,915,203 |
| 8,343,368 | ||
| Telecommunications (1.1%) | ||
| NII Holdings, Inc. † | 96,000 | 5,247,360 |
| 5,247,360 | ||
| Toys (1.2%) | ||
| Hasbro, Inc. S | 75,600 | 2,927,232 |
| Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. † S | 315,300 | 3,017,421 |
| 5,944,653 | ||
| Transportation Services (0.5%) | ||
| Landstar Systems, Inc. | 50,100 | 2,534,059 |
| 2,534,059 | ||
| Total common stocks (cost $467,982,778) | $467,396,951 | |
22
| WARRANTS (0.4%)* † | Expiration date | Strike Price | Warrants | Value |
| Gome Electrical Appliances Holdings 144A (Hong Kong) | 2/19/09 | — | 4,100,000 | $1,728,970 |
| Total warrants (cost $2,288,497) | $1,728,970 | |||
| CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCKS (—%)* | Shares | Value | ||
| MarketSoft Software Corp. — escrow (acquired 2/9/06, cost $—) (Private) ‡ † F | 1,354,608 | $135 | ||
| Totality Corp. Ser. D, $0.346 cum. cv. pfd. (acquired 6/26/00, cost $2,240,735) (Private) ‡ † F | 878,186 | 88 | ||
| Total convertible preferred stocks (cost $2,240,735) | $223 | |||
| SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (25.5%)* | Principal amount/shares | Value | ||
| Putnam Prime Money Market Fund e | 30,267,927 | $30,267,927 | ||
| Short-term investments held as collateral for loaned securities with yields ranging from 2.00% to 2.96% | ||||
| and due dates ranging from August 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 d | $94,511,453 | 94,393,400 | ||
| Total short-term investments (cost $124,661,327) | $124,661,327 | |||
| TOTAL INVESTMENTS | ||||
| Total investments (cost $597,173,337) | $593,787,471 | |||
* Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $488,193,979.
† Non-income-producing security.
‡ Restricted, excluding 144A securities, as to public resale. The total market value of restricted securities held at July 31, 2008 was $769,672 or 0.2% of net assets.
d See Note 1 to the financial statements.
e See Note 5 to the financial statements regarding investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund.
F Is valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees. On July 31, 2008, fair value pricing was also used for certain foreign securities in the portfolio (Note 1).
R Real Estate Investment Trust.
S Securities on loan, in part or in entirety, at July 31, 2008.
At July 31, 2008, liquid assets totaling $9,123 have been designated as collateral for open written options contracts.
144A after the name of an issuer represents securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.
ADR after the name of a foreign holding stands for American Depository Receipts representing ownership of foreign securities on deposit with a custodian bank.
| WRITTEN OPTIONS OUTSTANDING at 7/31/08 (premiums received $9,123) | Contract | Expiration date/ | ||
| amount | strike price | Value | ||
| Marvel Entertainment, Inc. (Call) | $9,810 | Aug-08/$38.17 | $9,123 | |
| Total | $9,123 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
23
| Statement of assets and liabilities 7/31/08 | |
| ASSETS | |
| Investment in securities, at value, including $91,828,795 | |
| of securities on loan (Note 1): | |
| Unaffiliated issuers (identified cost $566,905,410) | $563,519,544 |
| Affiliated issuers (identified cost $30,267,927) (Note 5) | 30,267,927 |
| Cash | 542 |
| Dividends, interest and other receivables | 422,965 |
| Receivable for shares of the fund sold | 1,432,573 |
| Receivable for securities sold | 13,241,214 |
| Total assets | 608,884,765 |
| LIABILITIES | |
| Payable for securities purchased | 21,463,911 |
| Payable for shares of the fund repurchased | 3,410,281 |
| Payable for compensation of Manager (Notes 2 and 5) | 522,118 |
| Payable for investor servicing fees (Note 2) | 166,854 |
| Payable for custodian fees (Note 2) | 1,833 |
| Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) | 320,995 |
| Payable for administrative services (Note 2) | 3,515 |
| Payable for distribution fees (Note 2) | 148,314 |
| Written options outstanding, at value | |
| (premiums received $9,123) (Notes 1 and 3) | 9,123 |
| Collateral on securities loaned, at value (Note 1) | 94,393,400 |
| Other accrued expenses | 250,442 |
| Total liabilities | 120,690,786 |
| Net assets | $488,193,979 |
| REPRESENTED BY | |
| Paid-in capital (Unlimited shares authorized) (Notes 1 and 4) | $5,735,404,976 |
| Accumulated net realized loss on investments | |
| and foreign currency transactions (Note 1) | (5,243,825,131) |
| Net unrealized depreciation of investments | (3,385,866) |
| Total — Representing net assets applicable | |
| to capital shares outstanding | $488,193,979 |
| COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE AND OFFERING PRICE | |
| Net asset value and redemption price per class A share | |
| ($386,629,870 divided by 43,724,165 shares) | $8.84 |
| Offering price per class A share (100/94.25 of $8.84)* | $9.38 |
| Net asset value and offering price per class B share | |
| ($58,243,089 divided by 7,614,917 shares)** | $7.65 |
| Net asset value and offering price per class C share | |
| ($10,294,602 divided by 1,248,502 shares)** | $8.25 |
| Net asset value and redemption price per class M share | |
| ($9,263,930 divided by 1,140,038 shares) | $8.13 |
| Offering price per class M share (100/96.50 of $8.13)* | $8.42 |
| Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per class R share | |
| ($447,282 divided by 51,182 shares) | $8.74 |
| Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per class Y share | |
| ($23,315,206 divided by 2,538,370 shares) | $9.19 |
* On single retail sales of less than $50,000. On sales of $50,000 or more the offering price is reduced.
** Redemption price per share is equal to net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
24
Statement of operations Year ended 7/31/08
| INVESTMENT INCOME | |
| Dividends (net of foreign tax of $12,307) | $3,135,545 |
| Interest (including interest income of $527,355 | |
| from investments in affiliated issuers) (Note 5) | 536,833 |
| Securities lending | 986,374 |
| Total investment income | 4,658,752 |
| EXPENSES | |
| Compensation of Manager (Note 2) | 4,002,829 |
| Investor servicing fees (Note 2) | 2,350,859 |
| Custodian fees (Note 2) | 29,220 |
| Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) | 39,788 |
| Administrative services (Note 2) | 26,513 |
| Distribution fees — Class A (Note 2) | 1,118,678 |
| Distribution fees — Class B (Note 2) | 884,618 |
| Distribution fees — Class C (Note 2) | 120,899 |
| Distribution fees — Class M (Note 2) | 86,227 |
| Distribution fees — Class R (Note 2) | 2,033 |
| Other | 428,553 |
| Non-recurring costs (Notes 2 and 6) | 1,119 |
| Costs assumed by Manager (Notes 2 and 6) | (1,119) |
| Fees waived and reimbursed by Manager (Notes 2 and 5) | (332,561) |
| Total expenses | 8,757,656 |
| Expense reduction (Note 2) | (159,175) |
| Net expenses | 8,598,481 |
| Net investment loss | (3,939,729) |
| Net realized loss on investments (Notes 1 and 3) | (27,028,172) |
| Net realized gain on futures contracts (Note 1) | 104,771 |
| Net realized loss on foreign currency transactions (Note 1) | (2,526) |
| Net realized gain on written options (Notes 1 and 3) | 535,840 |
| Net unrealized depreciation of assets and liabilities | |
| in foreign currencies during the year | (15) |
| Net unrealized depreciation of investments, | |
| future contracts and written options during the year | (40,706,202) |
| Net loss on investments | (67,096,304) |
| Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations | $(71,036,033) |
Statement of changes in net assets
| DECREASE IN NET ASSETS | ||
| Year ended | Year ended | |
| 7/31/08 | 7/31/07 | |
| Operations: | ||
| Net investment loss | $(3,939,729) | $(4,893,093) |
| Net realized gain (loss) on investments | ||
| and foreign currency transactions | (26,390,087) | 127,893,076 |
| Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||
| of investments and assets and liabilities in | ||
| foreign currencies | (40,706,217) | 31,606,753 |
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets | ||
| resulting from operations | (71,036,033) | 154,606,736 |
| Redemption fees (Note 1) | 1,489 | 1,431 |
| Decrease from capital share | ||
| transactions (Note 4) | (120,531,236) | (167,331,394) |
| Total decrease in net assets | (191,565,780) | (12,723,227) |
| NET ASSETS | ||
| Beginning of year | 679,759,759 | 692,482,986 |
| End of year | $488,193,979 | $679,759,759 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
25
Financial highlights (For a common share outstanding throughout the period)
| INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | RATIOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Ratio of net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net realized and | Net assets, | Ratio of expenses | investment income | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net asset value, | Net investment | unrealized gain (loss) on | Total from investment | Redemption | Net asset value, | Total return at net | end of period | to average | (loss) to average | Portfolio | ||||||||||||
| Period ended | beginning of period | income (loss) a | investments | operations | fees | end of period | asset value (%) b | (in thousands) | net assets (%) c | net assets (%) | turnover (%) | |||||||||||
| Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| July 31, 2008 | $10.00 | (.05) d | (1.11) e | (1.16) | — f | $8.84 | (11.60) e | $386,630 | 1.37 d | (.55) d | 184.20 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2007 | 8.02 | (.05) d | 2.03 | 1.98 | — f | 10.00 | 24.69 | 509,597 | 1.42 d | (.55) d | 114.76 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2006 | 7.65 | (.05) d,g | .42 | .37 | — f | 8.02 | 4.84 g | 486,400 | 1.33 d,g | (.65) d,g | 129.93 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2005 | 6.36 | (.06) d,h | 1.35 | 1.29 | — f | 7.65 | 20.28 | 765,195 | 1.40 d | (.82) d,h | 163.45 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2004 | 6.13 | (.07) d | .30 | .23 | — | 6.36 | 3.75 | 906,748 | 1.34 d | (1.00) d | 62.51 | |||||||||||
| Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| July 31, 2008 | $8.72 | (.11) d | (.96) e | (1.07) | — f | $7.65 | (12.27) e | $58,243 | 2.12 d | (1.30) d | 184.20 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2007 | 7.04 | (.10) d | 1.78 | 1.68 | — f | 8.72 | 23.86 | 115,115 | 2.17 d | (1.29) d | 114.76 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2006 | 6.77 | (.10) d,g | .37 | .27 | — f | 7.04 | 3.99 g | 135,697 | 2.08 d,g | (1.41) d,g | 129.93 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2005 | 5.67 | (.10) d,h | 1.20 | 1.10 | — f | 6.77 | 19.40 | 197,584 | 2.15 d | (1.57) d,h | 163.45 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2004 | 5.51 | (.11) d | .27 | .16 | — | 5.67 | 2.90 | 272,144 | 2.09 d | (1.75) d | 62.51 | |||||||||||
| Class C | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| July 31, 2008 | $9.40 | (.12) d | (1.03) e | (1.15) | — f | $8.25 | (12.23) e | $10,295 | 2.12 d | (1.29) d | 184.20 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2007 | 7.59 | (.11) d | 1.92 | 1.81 | — f | 9.40 | 23.85 | 13,281 | 2.17 d | (1.30) d | 114.76 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2006 | 7.30 | (.11) d,g | .40 | .29 | — f | 7.59 | 3.97 g | 12,464 | 2.08 d,g | (1.40) d,g | 129.93 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2005 | 6.11 | (.10) d,h | 1.29 | 1.19 | — f | 7.30 | 19.48 | 15,276 | 2.15 d | (1.57) d,h | 163.45 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2004 | 5.94 | (.11) d | .28 | .17 | — | 6.11 | 2.86 | 17,558 | 2.09 d | (1.75) d | 62.51 | |||||||||||
| Class M | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| July 31, 2008 | $9.24 | (.09) d | (1.02) e | (1.11) | — f | $8.13 | (12.01) e | $9,264 | 1.87 d | (1.05) d | 184.20 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2007 | 7.45 | (.09) d | 1.88 | 1.79 | — f | 9.24 | 24.03 | 13,200 | 1.92 d | (1.05) d | 114.76 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2006 | 7.14 | (.09) d,g | .40 | .31 | — f | 7.45 | 4.34 g | 14,476 | 1.83 d,g | (1.24) d,g | 129.93 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2005 | 5.97 | (.08) d,h | 1.25 | 1.17 | — f | 7.14 | 19.60 | 195,693 | 1.90 d | (1.31) d,h | 163.45 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2004 | 5.78 | (.09) d | .28 | .19 | — | 5.97 | 3.29 | 197,632 | 1.84 d | (1.50) d | 62.51 | |||||||||||
| Class R | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| July 31, 2008 | $9.91 | (.08) d | (1.09) e | (1.17) | — f | $8.74 | (11.81) e | $447 | 1.62 d | (.81) d | 184.20 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2007 | 7.97 | (.07) d | 2.01 | 1.94 | — f | 9.91 | 24.34 | 190 | 1.67 d | (.80) d | 114.76 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2006 | 7.62 | (.07) d,g | .42 | .35 | — f | 7.97 | 4.59 g | 128 | 1.58 d,g | (.89) d,g | 129.93 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2005 | 6.35 | (.07) d,h | 1.34 | 1.27 | — f | 7.62 | 20.00 | 80 | 1.65 d | (1.04) d,h | 163.45 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2004 † | 6.97 | (.05) d | (.57) | (.62) | — | 6.35 | (8.90) * | 10 | 1.06 d* | (.84) d* | 62.51 | |||||||||||
| Class Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| July 31, 2008 | $10.36 | (.03) d | (1.14) e | (1.17) | — f | $9.19 | (11.29) e | $23,315 | 1.12 d | (.29) d | 184.20 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2007 | 8.29 | (.03) d | 2.10 | 2.07 | — f | 10.36 | 24.97 | 28,378 | 1.17 d | (.27) d | 114.76 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2006 | 7.88 | (.03) d,g | .44 | .41 | — f | 8.29 | 5.20 g | 43,318 | 1.08 d,g | (.40) d,g | 129.93 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2005 | 6.54 | (.04) d,h | 1.38 | 1.34 | — f | 7.88 | 20.49 | 43,914 | 1.15 d | (.57) d,h | 163.45 | |||||||||||
| July 31, 2004 | 6.29 | (.06) d | .31 | .25 | — | 6.54 | 3.98 | 93,510 | 1.09 d | (.75) d | 62.51 | |||||||||||
* Not annualized
† For the period December 1, 2003 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2004.
a Per share net investment loss has been determined on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.
b Total return assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.
c Includes amounts paid through expense offset and brokerage service arrangements (Note 2).
d Reflects an involuntary contractual expense limitation and/or waivers of certain fund expenses in connection with investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund in effect during the period. As a result of such limitation and/ or waivers, the expenses of each class reflect a reduction of the following amounts (Notes 2 and 5):
| Percentage of average net assets | ||
| July 31, 2008 | 0.06% | |
| July 31, 2007 | 0.06 | |
| July 31, 2006 | 0.04 | |
| July 31, 2005 | 0.01 | |
| July 31, 2004 | <0.01 | |
e Reflects a non-recurring reimbursement pursuant to a settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and Knight Securities, L.P. which amounted to $0.07 per share.
f Amount represents less than $0.01 per share.
g Reflects a non-recurring reimbursement from Putnam Investments relating to the calculation of certain amounts paid by the fund to Putnam in previous years for transfer agent services, which amounted to $0.01 per share and 0.11% of average net assets for the period ended July 31, 2006.
h Reflects a non-recurring accrual related to Putnam Management’s settlement with the SEC regarding brokerage allocation practices, which amounted to the following amounts:
| Percentage | ||
| of average | ||
| Per share | net assets | |
| Class A | <$0.01 | 0.04% |
| Class B | <0.01 | 0.04 |
| Class C | <0.01 | 0.04 |
| Class M | <0.01 | 0.04 |
| Class R | <0.01 | 0.05 |
| Class Y | <0.01 | 0.04 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| 26 | 27 |
Notes to financial statements 7/31/08
Note 1: Significant accounting policies
Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund (the “fund”), a Massachusetts business trust, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The fund seeks capital appreciation through investments in common stocks of small to medium-sized emerging growth companies traded in the over-the-counter (OTC) market and common stocks of “emerging growth” companies listed on securities exchanges.
The fund offers class A, class B, class C, class M, class R and class Y shares. Class A and class M shares are sold with a maximum front-end sales charge of 5.75% and 3.50%, respectively, and generally do not pay a contingent deferred sales charge. Class B shares, which convert to class A shares after approximately eight years, do not pay a front-end sales charge and are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge, if those shares are redeemed within six years of purchase. Class C shares have a one-year 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge and do not convert to class A shares. Class R shares, which are offered to qualified employee-benefit plans, are sold at net asset value. The expenses for class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares may differ based on the distribution fee of each class, which is identified in Note 2. Class Y shares, which are sold at net asset value, are generally subject to the same expenses as class A, class B, class C, class M an d class R shares, but do not bear a distribution fee. Class Y shares are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs.
A 1.00% redemption fee may apply on any shares that are redeemed (either by selling or exchanging into another fund) within 7 days of purchase. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in-capital.
Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses and expenses of the fund are borne pro-rata based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the fund, except that each class bears expenses unique to that class (including the distribution fees applicable to such classes). Each class votes as a class only with respect to its own distribution plan or other matters on which a class vote is required by law or determined by the Trustees. If the fund were liquidated, shares of each class would receive their pro-rata share of the net assets of the fund. In addition, the Trustees declare separate dividends on each class of shares.
In the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that may include agreements to indemnify another party under given circumstances. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be, but have not yet been, made against the fund. However, the fund’s management team expects the risk of material loss to be remote.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The preparation of financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A) Security valuation Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the last reported sales price on their principal exchange, or official closing price for certain markets. If no sales are reported — as in the case of some securities traded over-the-counter — a security is valued at its last reported bid price. Many securities markets and exchanges outside the U.S. close prior to the close of the New York Stock Exchange and therefore the closing prices for securities in such markets or on such exchanges may not fully reflect events that occur after such close but before the close of the New York Stock Exchange. Accordingly, on certain days, the fund will fair value foreign equity securities taking into account multiple factors, including movements in the U.S. securities markets. The number of days on which fair value prices will be used will depend on market activity and it is possible that fair value prices will be used by the fund to a significant extent. At July 31, 2008, fair value pricing was used for certain foreign securities in the portfolio. Securities quoted in foreign currencies, if any, are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate. Certain investments, including certain restricted securities and derivatives, are also valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees. Such valuations and procedures are reviewed periodically by the Trustees. The fair value of securities is generally determined as the amount that the fund could reasonably expect to realize from an orderly disposition of such securities over a reasonable period of time. By its nature, a fair value price is a good faith estimate of the value of a security at a given point in time and does not reflect an actual market price, which may be different by a material amount.
B) Joint trading account Pursuant to an exemptive order from the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the fund may transfer uninvested cash balances, including cash collateral received under security lending arrangements, into a joint trading account along with the cash of other registered investment companies and certain other accounts managed by Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”), the fund’s manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC. These balances may be invested in issues of short-term investments having maturities of up to 397 days for collateral received under security lending arrangements and up to 90 days for other cash investments.
C) Repurchase agreements The fund, or any joint trading account, through its custodian, receives delivery of the underlying securities, the market value of which at the time of purchase is required to be in an amount at least equal to the resale price, including accrued interest. Collateral for certain tri-party repurchase agreements is held at the counterparty’s custodian in a segregated account for the benefit of the fund and the counterparty. Putnam Management is responsible for determining that the value of these underlying securities is at all times at least equal to the resale price, including accrued interest.
D) Security transactions and related investment income Security transactions are recorded on the trade date (the date the order to buy or sell is executed). Gains or losses on securities sold are determined on the identified cost basis.
Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividend income, net of applicable withholding taxes, is recognized on the ex-dividend date except that certain dividends from foreign securities are recognized as soon as the fund is informed of the ex-dividend date. Non-cash dividends, if any, are recorded at the fair market value of the securities received. Dividends representing a return of capital or capital gains, if any, are reflected as a reduction of cost and/or as a realized gain.
E) Foreign currency translation The accounting records of the fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. The market value of foreign securities, currency holdings, and other assets and liabilities is recorded in the books and records of the fund after translation to U.S. dollars based on the exchange rates on that day. The cost of each security is determined using historical exchange rates. Income and withholding taxes are translated at prevailing exchange rates when earned or incurred. The fund does not isolate that portion of realized or unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in the foreign exchange rate on investments from fluctuations arising from changes in the market prices of the securities. Such gains and losses are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments. Net realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions represent net realized exchange gains or losses on closed fo rward currency contracts, disposition of foreign currencies, currency gains and losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions and the difference between the amount of investment income and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized appreciation and depreciation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies arise from changes in the value of open forward currency contracts and assets and liabilities other than investments at the period end, resulting from changes in the exchange rate.
28
Investments in foreign securities involve certain risks, including those related to economic instability, unfavorable political developments, and currency fluctuations, not present with domestic investments.
F) Futures and options contracts The fund may use futures and options contracts to hedge against changes in the values of securities the fund owns, owned or expects to purchase, or for other investment purposes. The fund may also write options on swaps or securities it owns or in which it may invest to increase its current returns.
The potential risk to the fund is that the change in value of futures and options contracts may not correspond to the change in value of the hedged instruments. In addition, losses may arise from changes in the value of the underlying instruments, if there is an illiquid secondary market for the contracts, or if the counterparty to the contract is unable to perform. Risks may exceed amounts recognized on the Statement of assets and liabilities. When the contract is closed, the fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Realized gains and losses on purchased options are included in realized gains and losses on investment securities. If a written call option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as an addition to sales proceeds. If a written put option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as a reduction to the cost of investments.
Futures contracts are valued at the quoted daily settlement prices established by the exchange on which they trade. The fund and the broker agree to exchange an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the futures contract. Such receipts or payments are known as “variation margin.” Exchange traded options are valued at the last sale price or, if no sales are reported, the last bid price for purchased options and the last ask price for written options. Options traded over-the-counter are valued using prices supplied by dealers. Futures and written option contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.
G) Securities lending The fund may lend securities, through its agents, to qualified borrowers in order to earn additional income. The loans are collateralized by cash and/or securities in an amount at least equal to the market value of the securities loaned. The market value of securities loaned is determined daily and any additional required collateral is allocated to the fund on the next business day. The risk of borrower default will be borne by the fund’s agents; the fund will bear the risk of loss with respect to the investment of the cash collateral. Income from securities lending is included in investment income on the Statement of operations. At July 31, 2008, the value of securities loaned amounted to $91,963,065. Certain of these securities were sold prior to period end and are included in the Receivable for securities sold on the Statement of assets and liabilities. The fund received cash collateral of $94, 393,400 which is pooled with collateral of other Putnam funds into 70 issues of short-term investments.
H) Federal taxes It is the policy of the fund to distribute all of its taxable income within the prescribed time and otherwise comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), applicable to regulated investment companies. It is also the intention of the fund to distribute an amount sufficient to avoid imposition of any excise tax under Section 4982 of the Code. Therefore, no provision has been made for federal taxes on income, capital gains or unrealized appreciation on securities held nor for excise tax on income and capital gains.
At July 31, 2008, the fund had a capital loss carryover of $5,203,427,199 available to the extent allowed by the Code to offset future net capital gain, if any. The amount of the carryover and the expiration dates are:
| Loss Carryover | Expiration | |||
| $4,179,897,234 | July 31, 2010 | |||
| 985,045,539 | July 31, 2011 | |||
| 38,484,426 | July 31, 2012 | |||
Pursuant to federal income tax regulations applicable to regulated investment companies, the fund has elected to defer to its fiscal year ending July 31, 2009 approximately $39,565,828 of losses recognized during the period November 1, 2007 to July 31, 2008.
I) Distributions to shareholders Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are recorded by the fund on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. The amount and character of income and gains to be distributed are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. These differences include temporary and/or permanent differences of losses on wash sale transactions, post-October loss deferrals, nontaxable dividends and net operating loss. Reclassifications are made to the fund’s capital accounts to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) under income tax regulations. For the year ended July 31, 2008, the fund reclassified $3,939,729 to decrease accumulated net investment loss and $4,471,539 to decrease paid - -in-capital, with a decrease to accumulated net realized losses of $531,810.
The tax basis components of distributable earnings and the federal tax cost as of July 31, 2008 were as follows:
| Unrealized appreciation | $36,557,342 | ||
| Unrealized depreciation | (40,775,312) | ||
| Net unrealized depreciation | (4,217,970) | ||
| Capital loss carryforward | (5,203,427,199) | ||
| Post-October loss | (39,565,828) | ||
| Cost for federal income tax purposes | $598,005,441 | ||
Note 2: Management fee, administrative services and other transactions
The fund pays Putnam Management for management and investment advisory services monthly based on the average net assets of the fund. Such fee is based on the following annual rates: 0.70% of the first $500 million of average net assets, 0.60% of the next $500 million, 0.55% of the next $500 million, 0.50% of the next $5 billion, 0.475% of the next $5 billion, 0.455% of the next $5 billion, 0.44% of the next $5 billion and 0.43% thereafter.
Putnam Management has agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses of the fund through June 30, 2009 to the extent necessary to ensure that the fund’s expenses do not exceed the simple average of the expenses of all front-end load funds viewed by Lipper Inc. as having the same investment classification or objective as the fund. The expense reimbursement is based on a comparison of the fund’s expenses with the average annualized operating expenses of the funds in its Lipper peer group for each calendar quarter during the fund’s last fiscal year, excluding 12b-1 fees and without giving effect to any expense offset and brokerage/service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses.
Putnam Management has further agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses of the fund for the period from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2009 to the extent necessary to ensure that the fund’s expenses do not exceed the simple average of the expenses of a custom group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc. based on the size of the fund. The expense reimburse ment is based on a comparison of the fund’s total expenses with the average operating expenses of the funds in this Lipper custom peer group for their respective 2006 and 2007 fiscal years, excluding 12b-1 fees and after adjustment for certain expense offset and brokerage/service arrangements that reduced expenses of the fund.
For the year ended July 31, 2008, the fund’s expenses were limited to the lower of the limits specified above and accordingly, Putnam Management waived $320,991 of its management fee from the fund.
For the year ended July 31, 2008, Putnam Management has assumed $1,119 of legal, shareholder servicing and communication, audit and Trustee fees
29
incurred by the fund in connection with certain legal and regulatory matters (including those described in Note 6).
The fund reimburses Putnam Management an allocated amount for the compensation and related expenses of certain officers of the fund and their staff who provide administrative services to the fund. The aggregate amount of all such reimbursements is determined annually by the Trustees.
Custodial services for the fund’s assets were provided by Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), an affiliate of Putnam Management, and by State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”). Custody fees are based on the fund’s asset level, the number of its security holdings, transaction volumes and with respect to PFTC, certain fees related to the transition of assets to State Street. Putnam Investor Services, a division of PFTC, provided investor servicing agent functions to the fund. Putnam Investor Services received fees for investor servicing, subject to certain limitations, based on the number of shareholder accounts in the fund and the level of defined contribution plan assets in the fund. During the year ended July 31, 2008, the fund incurred $2,361,192 for custody and investor servicing agent functions provided by PFTC.
The fund has entered into expense offset arrangements with PFTC and State Street whereby PFTC’s and State Street’s fees are reduced by credits allowed on cash balances. The fund also reduced expenses through brokerage/service arrangements. For the year ended July 31, 2008, the fund’s expenses were reduced by $57,291 under the expense offset arrangements and by $101,884 under the brokerage/service arrangements.
Each independent Trustee of the fund receives an annual Trustee fee, of which $392, as a quarterly retainer, has been allocated to the fund, and an additional fee for each Trustees meeting attended. Trustees receive additional fees for attendance at certain committee meetings and industry seminars and for certain compliance-related matters. Trustees also are reimbursed for expenses they incur relating to their services as Trustees.
The fund has adopted a Trustee Fee Deferral Plan (the “Deferral Plan”) which allows the Trustees to defer the receipt of all or a portion of Trustees fees payable on or after July 1, 1995. The deferred fees remain invested in certain Putnam funds until distribution in accordance with the Deferral Plan.
The fund has adopted an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) covering all Trustees of the fund who have served as a Trustee for at least five years and were first elected prior to 2004. Benefits under the Pension Plan are equal to 50% of the Trustee’s average annual attendance and retainer fees for the three years ended December 31, 2005. The retirement benefit is payable during a Trustee’s lifetime, beginning the year following retirement, for the number of years of service through December 31, 2006. Pension expense for the fund is included in Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of operations. Accrued pension liability is included in Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of assets and liabilities. The Trustees have terminated the Pension Plan with respect to any Trustee first elected after 2003.
The fund has adopted distribution plans (the “Plans”) with respect to its class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The purpose of the Plans is to compensate Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC and Putnam Retail Management GP, Inc., for services provided and expenses incurred in distributing shares of the fund. The Plans provide for payments by the fund to Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership at an annual rate of up to 0.35%, 1.00%, 1.00%, 1.00% and 1.00% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, respectively. The Trustees have approved payment by the fund at an annual rate of 0.25%, 1.00%, 1.00%, 0.75% and 0.50% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, respectively.
For the year ended July 31, 2008, Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, acting as underwriter, received net commissions of $34,912 and $1,102 from the sale of class A and class M shares, respectively, and received $69,008 and $748 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of class B and class C shares, respectively.
A deferred sales charge of up to 1.00% and 0.65% is assessed on certain redemptions of class A and class M shares, respectively. For the year ended July 31, 2008, Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, acting as underwriter, received $400 and no monies on class A and class M redemptions, respectively.
Note 3: Purchases and sales of securities
During the year ended July 31, 2008, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities other than short-term investments aggregated $1,057,815,170 and $1,189,213,716, respectively. There were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
Written option transactions during the year ended July 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
| Contract | Premiums | |||
| Amounts | Received | |||
| Written options outstanding | ||||
| at beginning of year | $17,620 | $40,237 | ||
| Options opened | 460,340 | 595,091 | ||
| Options exercised | (58,820) | (90,039) | ||
| Options expired | (400,010) | (520,685) | ||
| Options closed | (9,320) | (15,481) | ||
| Written options outstanding | ||||
| at end of year | $9,810 | $9,123 | ||
Note 4: Capital shares
At July 31, 2008, there was an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:
| Year ended 7/31/08 | Year ended 7/31/07 | ||||
| Class A | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
| Shares sold | 5,742,076 | $54,382,895 | 6,756,140 | $64,423,149 | |
| Shares issued in | — | — | — | — | |
| connection with | |||||
| reinvestment of | |||||
| distributions | |||||
| 5,742,076 | 54,382,895 | 6,756,140 | 64,423,149 | ||
| Shares | (12,966,514) | (123,519,571) | (16,452,281) | (152,671,547) | |
| repurchased | |||||
| Net decrease | (7,224,438) | $(69,136,676) | (9,696,141) | $(88,248,398) | |
| Year ended 7/31/08 | Year ended 7/31/07 | ||||
| Class B | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
| Shares sold | 451,686 | $3,768,480 | 771,116 | $6,284,280 | |
| Shares issued in | — | — | — | — | |
| connection with | |||||
| reinvestment of | |||||
| distributions | |||||
| 451,686 | 3,768,480 | 771,116 | 6,284,280 | ||
| Shares | (6,041,148) | (49,425,244) | (6,833,593) | (55,123,385) | |
| repurchased | |||||
| Net decrease | (5,589,462) | $(45,656,764) | (6,062,477) | $(48,839,105) | |
30
| Year ended 7/31/08 | Year ended 7/31/07 | ||||
| Class C | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
| Shares sold | 178,641 | $1,628,179 | 188,654 | $1,673,721 | |
| Shares issued in | — | — | — | — | |
| connection with | |||||
| reinvestment of | |||||
| distributions | |||||
| 178,641 | 1,628,179 | 188,654 | 1,673,721 | ||
| Shares | (343,447) | (3,038,687) | (417,034) | (3,646,285) | |
| repurchased | |||||
| Net decrease | (164,806) | $(1,410,508) | (228,380) | $(1,972,564) | |
| Year ended 7/31/08 | Year ended 7/31/07 | ||||
| Class M | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
| Shares sold | 105,484 | $933,832 | 172,136 | $1,487,509 | |
| Shares issued in | — | — | — | — | |
| connection with | |||||
| reinvestment of | |||||
| distributions | |||||
| 105,484 | 933,832 | 172,136 | 1,487,509 | ||
| Shares | (394,197) | (3,477,162) | (687,503) | (5,944,264) | |
| repurchased | |||||
| Net decrease | (288,713) | $(2,543,330) | (515,367) | $(4,456,755) | |
| Year ended 7/31/08 | Year ended 7/31/07 | ||||
| Class R | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
| Shares sold | 42,808 | $429,084 | 9,126 | $84,913 | |
| Shares issued in | — | — | — | — | |
| connection with | |||||
| reinvestment of | |||||
| distributions | |||||
| 42,808 | 429,084 | 9,126 | 84,913 | ||
| Shares | (10,766) | (105,455) | (6,085) | (61,314) | |
| repurchased | |||||
| Net increase | 32,042 | $323,629 | 3,041 | $23,599 | |
| Year ended 7/31/08 | Year ended 7/31/07 | ||||
| Class Y | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
| Shares sold | 527,764 | $5,134,404 | 717,428 | $6,861,044 | |
| Shares issued in | — | — | — | — | |
| connection with | |||||
| reinvestment of | |||||
| distributions | |||||
| 527,764 | 5,134,404 | 717,428 | 6,861,044 | ||
| Shares | (727,747) | (7,241,991) | (3,205,398) | (30,699,215) | |
| repurchased | |||||
| Net decrease | (199,983) | $(2,107,587) | (2,487,970) | $(23,838,171) | |
Note 5: Investment in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund
The fund invests in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund, an open-end management investment company managed by Putnam Management. Investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund are valued at its closing net asset value each business day. Management fees paid by the fund are reduced by an amount equal to the management fees paid by Putnam Prime Money Market Fund with respect to assets invested by the fund in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund. For the year ended July 31, 2008, management fees paid were reduced by $11,570 relating to the fund’s investment in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund. Income distributions earned by the fund are recorded as income in the Statement of operations and totaled $527,355 for the year ended July 31, 2008. During the year ended July 31, 2008, cost of purchases and proceeds of sales of investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund aggregated $342,686,303 and $323,100,338, respectively.
Note 6: Regulatory matters and litigation
In late 2003 and 2004, Putnam Management settled charges brought by the SEC and the Massachusetts Securities Division in connection with excessive short-term trading in Putnam funds. Distribution of payments from Putnam Management to certain open-end Putnam funds and their shareholders is expected to be completed in the next several months. These allegations and related matters have served as the general basis for certain lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits against Putnam Management and, in a limited number of cases, some Putnam funds. Putnam Management believes that these lawsuits will have no material adverse effect on the funds or on Putnam Management’s ability to provide investment management services. In addition, Putnam Management has agreed to bear any costs incurred by the Putnam funds as a result of these matters.
Note 7: New accounting pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (the “Interpretation”). The Interpretation prescribes a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken by a filer in the filer’s tax return. Upon adoption, the Interpretation did not have a material effect on the fund’s financial statements. However, the conclusions regarding the Interpretation may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, further implementation guidance expected from the FASB, and on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. Each of the fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (the “Standard”). The Standard defines fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Standard applies to fair value measurements already required or permitted by existing standards. The Standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Putnam Management does not believe the adoption of the Standard will impact the amounts reported in the financial statements; however, additional disclosures will be required about the inputs used to develop the measurements of fair value.
In March 2008, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 161”) — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS 133”), was issued and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments and how derivative instruments affect an entity’s financial position. Putnam Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 161 will have on the fund’s financial statement disclosures.
31
Federal tax information and brokerage commissions (unaudited)
Federal tax information
The Form 1099 you receive in January 2009 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar 2008.
Brokerage commissions
Brokerage commissions are paid to firms that execute trades on behalf of your fund. When choosing these firms, Putnam is required by law to seek the best execution of the trades, taking all relevant factors into consideration, including expected quality of execution and commission rate. Listed below are the largest relationships based upon brokerage commissions for your fund and the other funds in Putnam’s U.S. Small- and Mid-Cap group for the year ended July 31, 2008. The Putnam mutual funds in this group are Putnam Capital Opportunities Fund, Putnam Discovery Growth Fund, Putnam Mid Cap Value Fund, Putnam New Opportunities Fund, Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund, Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund, Putnam Small Cap Value Fund, Putnam Vista Fund, Put-nam VT Capital Opportunities Fund, Putnam VT Discovery Growth Fund, Putnam VT Mid Cap Value Fund, Putnam VT New Opportunities Fund, Putnam VT OTC & Emerging Growth Fund, Putnam VT Small Cap Value Fund, and Putnam VT Vista Fund.
The top five firms that received brokerage commissions for trades executed for the U.S. Small- and Mid-Cap group are (in descending order) Morgan Stanley, UBS Warburg, Citigroup Global Markets, Credit Suisse First Boston, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith. Commissions paid to these firms together represented approximately 42% of the total brokerage commissions paid for the year ended July 31, 2008.
Commissions paid to the next 10 firms together represented approximately 36% of the total brokerage commissions paid during the period. These firms are (in alphabetical order) Bear Stearns, CIBC World Markets, Deutsche Bank Securities, Goldman Sachs, Investment Technology Group, JPMorgan Securities, RBC Capital Markets, SG Cowen Securities, Wachovia Securities, and Weeden & Co.
Commission amounts do not include “mark-ups” paid on bond or derivative trades made directly with a dealer. Additional information about brokerage commissions is available on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Web site at www.sec. gov. Putnam funds disclose commissions by firm to the SEC in semiannual filings on Form N-SAR.
32
About the Trustees
Jameson A. Baxter
Trustee since 1994 and
Vice Chairman since 2005
Ms. Baxter is the President of Baxter Associates, Inc., a private investment firm.
Ms. Baxter serves as a Director of ASHTA Chemicals, Inc., and the Mutual Fund Directors Forum.
Until 2007, she was a Director of Banta Corporation (a printing and supply chain management company), Ryerson, Inc. (a metals service corporation), and Advocate Health Care. Until 2004, she was a Director of BoardSource (formerly the National Center for Nonprofit Boards); and until 2002, she was a Director of Intermatic Corporation (a manufacturer of energy control products). She is Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees, Mount Holyoke College, having served as Chairman for five years.
Ms. Baxter has held various positions in investment banking and corporate finance, including Vice President of and Consultant to First Boston Corporation and Vice President and Principal of the Regency Group. She is a graduate of Mount Holyoke College.
Charles B. Curtis
Trustee since 2001
Mr. Curtis is President and Chief Operating Officer of the Nuclear Threat Initiative (a private foundation dealing with national security issues), and serves as Senior Advisor to the United Nations Foundation.
Mr. Curtis is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and serves as Director of Edison International and Southern California Edison. Until 2006, Mr. Curtis served as a member of the Trustee Advisory Council of the Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University. Until 2003, Mr. Curtis was a member of the Electric Power Research Institute Advisory Council and the University of Chicago Board of Governors for Argonne National Laboratory. Prior to 2002, Mr. Curtis was a member of the Board of Directors of the Gas Technology Institute and the Board of Directors of the Environment and Natural Resources Program Steering Committee, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Until 2001, Mr. Curtis was a member of the Department of Defense Policy Board and Director of EG&G Technical Services, Inc. (a fossil energy research and development support company).
From August 1997 to December 1999, Mr. Curtis was a Partner at Hogan & Hartson LLP, an international law firm headquartered in Washington, D.C. Prior to May 1997, Mr. Curtis was Deputy Secretary of Energy and Under Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy. He served as Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from 1977 to 1981 and has held positions on the staff of the U.S. House of Representatives, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the SEC.
Robert J. Darretta
Trustee since 2007
Mr. Darretta serves as Director of United-Health Group, a diversified health-care company.
Until April 2007, Mr. Darretta was Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Johnson & Johnson, one of the world’s largest and most broadly based health-care companies. Prior to 2007, he had responsibility for Johnson & Johnson’s finance, investor relations, information technology, and procurement function. He served as Johnson & Johnson Chief Financial Officer for a decade, prior to which he spent two years as Treasurer of the corporation and over ten years leading various Johnson & Johnson operating companies.
Mr. Darretta received a B.S. in Economics from Villanova University.
Myra R. Drucker
Trustee since 2004
Ms. Drucker is Chair of the Board of Trustees of Commonfund (a not-for-profit firm specializing in managing assets for educational endowments and foundations), Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of Sarah Lawrence College, and a member of the Investment Committee of the Kresge Foundation (a charitable trust). She is also a Director of New York Stock Exchange LLC (a wholly-owned subsidiary of NYSE Euronext), and a Director of Interactive Data Corporation (a provider of financial market data and analytics to financial institutions and investors).
Ms. Drucker is an ex-officio member of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Pension Managers Advisory Committee, having served as Chair for seven years. She serves as an advisor to RCM Capital Management (an investment management firm) and to the Employee Benefits Investment Committee of The Boeing Company (an aerospace firm).
From November 2001 until August 2004, Ms. Drucker was Managing Director and a member of the Board of Directors of General Motors Asset Management and Chief Investment Officer of General Motors Trust Bank. From December 1992 to November 2001, Ms. Drucker served as Chief Investment Officer of Xerox Corporation (a document company). Prior to December 1992, Ms. Drucker was Staff Vice President and Director of Trust Investments for International Paper (a paper and packaging company).
Ms. Drucker received a B.A. degree in Literature and Psychology from Sarah Lawrence College and pursued graduate studies in economics, statistics, and portfolio theory at Temple University.
Charles E. Haldeman, Jr.*
Trustee since 2004 and
President of the Funds since 2007
Mr. Haldeman is Chairman of Putnam Investment Management, LLC and President of the Putnam Funds. Prior to July 2008, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam, LLC (“Putnam Investments”). Prior to November 2003, Mr. Haldeman served as Co-Head of Putnam Investments’ Investment Division.
33
Prior to joining Putnam Investments in 2002, Mr. Haldeman held executive positions in the investment management industry. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Delaware Investments and President and Chief Operating Officer of United Asset Management. Mr. Haldeman was also a Partner and Director of Cooke & Bieler, Inc. (an investment management firm).
Mr. Haldeman currently serves on the Board of Governors of the Investment Company Institute and as Chair of the Board of Trustees of Dartmouth College. He also serves on the Partners HealthCare Investment Committee, the Tuck School of Business Overseers, and the Harvard Business School Board of Dean’s Advisors. He is a graduate of Dartmouth College, Harvard Law School, and Harvard Business School. Mr. Haldeman is also a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) charterholder.
John A. Hill
Trustee since 1985 and Chairman since 2000
John A. Hill is founder and Vice-Chairman of First Reserve Corporation, the leading private equity buyout firm specializing in the worldwide energy industry, with offices in Greenwich, Connecticut; Houston, Texas; London, England; and Shanghai, China. The firm’s investments on behalf of some of the nation’s largest pension and endowment funds are currently concentrated in 26 companies with annual revenues in excess of $13 billion, which employ over 100,000 people in 23 countries.
Mr. Hill is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Putnam Mutual Funds, a Director of Devon Energy Corporation and various private companies owned by First Reserve, and serves as a Trustee of Sarah Lawrence College where he chairs the Investment Committee.
Prior to forming First Reserve in 1983, Mr. Hill served as President of F. Eberstadt and Company, an investment banking and investment management firm. Between 1969 and 1976, Mr. Hill held various senior positions in Washington, D.C. with the federal government, including Deputy Associate Director of the Office of Management and Budget and Deputy Administrator of the Federal Energy Administration during the Ford Administration.
Mr. Hill was born and raised in Midland, Texas; received his B.A. in Economics from Southern Methodist University; and pursued graduate studies as a Woodrow Wilson Fellow.
Paul L. Joskow
Trustee since 1997
Dr. Joskow is an economist and President of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (a philanthropic institution focused primarily on research and education on issues related to science, technology, and economic performance). He is on leave from his position as the Elizabeth and James Killian Professor of Economics and Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he has been on the faculty since 1972. Dr. Joskow was the Director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research at MIT from 1999 through 2007.
Dr. Joskow serves as a Trustee of Yale University, as a Director of TransCanada Corporation (an energy company focused on natural gas transmission and power services) and of Exelon Corporation (an energy company focused on power services), and as a member of the Board of Overseers of the Boston Symphony Orchestra. Prior to August 2007, he served as a Director of National Grid (a UK-based holding company with interests in electric and gas transmission and distribution and telecommunications infrastructure). Prior to July 2006, he served as President of the Yale University Council and continues to serve as a member of the Council. Prior to February 2005, he served on the board of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (a non-profit research institution). Prior to February 2002, he was a Director of State Farm Indemnity Company (an automobile insurance company), and prior to March 2000, he was a Director of New England Electric System (a public utility holding comp any).
Dr. Joskow has published six books and numerous articles on industrial organization, government regulation of industry, and competition policy. He is active in industry restructuring, environmental, energy, competition, and privatization policies —serving as an advisor to governments and corporations worldwide. Dr. Joskow holds a Ph.D. and MPhil from Yale University and a B.A. from Cornell University.
Elizabeth T. Kennan
Trustee since 1992
Dr. Kennan is a Partner of Cambus-Kenneth Farm (thoroughbred horse and cattle breeding). She is President Emeritus of Mount Holyoke College.
Dr. Kennan served as Chairman and is now Lead Director of Northeast Utilities. She is a Trustee of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, of Centre College, and of Midway College in Midway, Kentucky. Until 2006, she was a member of The Trustees of Reservations. Prior to 2001, Dr. Kennan served on the oversight committee of the Folger Shakespeare Library. Prior to June 2005, she was a Director of Talbots, Inc., and she has served as Director on a number of other boards, including Bell Atlantic, Chastain Real Estate, Shawmut Bank, Berkshire Life Insurance, and Kentucky Home Life Insurance. Dr. Kennan has also served as President of Five Colleges Incorporated and as a Trustee of Notre Dame University, and is active in various educational and civic associations.
As a member of the faculty of Catholic University for twelve years, until 1978, Dr. Kennan directed the post-doctoral program in Patristic and Medieval Studies, taught history, and published numerous articles and two books. Dr. Kennan holds a Ph.D. from the University of Washington in Seattle, an M.S. from St. Hilda’s College at Oxford University, and an A.B. from Mount Holyoke College. She holds several honorary doctorates.
34
Kenneth R. Leibler
Trustee since 2006
Mr. Leibler is a Founding Partner and former Chairman of the Boston Options Exchange, an electronic marketplace for the trading of derivative securities.
Mr. Leibler currently serves as a Trustee of Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston. He is also Lead Director of Ruder Finn Group, a global communications and advertising firm, and a Director of Northeast Utilities, which operates New England’s largest energy delivery system. Prior to December 2006, he served as a Director of the Optimum Funds group. Prior to October 2006, he served as a Director of ISO New England, the organization responsible for the operation of the electric generation system in the New England states. Prior to 2000, Mr. Leibler was a Director of the Investment Company Institute in Washington, D.C.
Prior to January 2005, Mr. Leibler served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Boston Stock Exchange. Prior to January 2000, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Financial Companies, a publicly traded diversified asset management organization. Prior to June 1990, Mr. Leibler served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the American Stock Exchange (AMEX), and at the time was the youngest person in AMEX history to hold the title of President. Prior to serving as AMEX President, he held the position of Chief Financial Officer, and headed its management and marketing operations. Mr. Leibler graduated magna cum laude with a degree in Economics from Syracuse University, where he was elected Phi Beta Kappa.
Robert E. Patterson
Trustee since 1984
Mr. Patterson is Senior Partner of Cabot Properties, LP and Chairman of Cabot Properties, Inc. (a private equity firm investing in commercial real estate).
Mr. Patterson serves as Chairman Emeritus and Trustee of the Joslin Diabetes Center. Prior to June 2003, he was a Trustee of Sea Education Association. Prior to December 2001, Mr. Patterson was President and Trustee of Cabot Industrial Trust (a publicly traded real estate investment trust). Prior to February 1998, he was Executive Vice President and Director of Acquisitions of Cabot Partners Limited Partnership (a registered investment adviser involved in institutional real estate investments). Prior to 1990, he served as Executive Vice President of Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Realty Advisors, Inc. (the predecessor company of Cabot Partners).
Mr. Patterson practiced law and held various positions in state government, and was the founding Executive Director of the Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency. Mr. Patterson is a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School.
George Putnam, III
Trustee since 1984
Mr. Putnam is Chairman of New Generation Research, Inc. (a publisher of financial advisory and other research services), and President of New Generation Advisers, Inc. (a registered investment adviser to private funds). Mr. Putnam founded the New Generation companies in 1986.
Mr. Putnam is a Director of The Boston Family Office, LLC (a registered investment adviser). He is a Trustee of St. Mark’s School and a Trustee of the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Until 2006, he was a Trustee of Shore Country Day School, and until 2002, was a Trustee of the Sea Education Association.
Mr. Putnam previously worked as an attorney with the law firm of Dechert LLP (formerly known as Dechert Price & Rhoads) in Philadelphia. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Harvard Business School, and Harvard Law School.
Richard B.Worley
Trustee since 2004
Mr. Worley is Managing Partner of Permit Capital LLC, an investment management firm.
Mr. Worley serves as a Trustee of the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (a philanthropic organization devoted to health-care issues), and the National Constitution Center. He is also a Director of The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation (a historical preservation organization), and the Philadelphia Orchestra Association. Mr. Worley also serves on the investment committees of Mount Holyoke College and World Wildlife Fund (a wildlife conservation organization).
Prior to joining Permit Capital LLC in 2002, Mr. Worley served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Investment Officer of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Investment Management and as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley, a financial services firm. Mr. Worley also was the Chairman of Miller Anderson & Sherrerd, an investment management firm that was acquired by Morgan Stanley in 1996.
Mr. Worley holds a B.S. degree from the University of Tennessee and pursued graduate studies in economics at the University of Texas.
The address of each Trustee is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.
As of July 31, 2008, there were 99 Putnam funds. All Trustees serve as Trustees of all Putnam funds.
Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, until his or her resignation, retirement at age 72, death, or removal.
* Trustee who is an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940) of the fund, Putnam Management, and/or Putnam Retail Management. Mr. Haldeman is the President of your fund and each of the other Putnam funds and Chairman of Putnam Investment Management, LLC, and prior to July 2008 was President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Investments.
35
Officers
In addition to Charles E. Haldeman, Jr., the other officers of the fund are shown below:
| Charles E. Porter (Born 1938) | James P. Pappas (Born 1953) | Wanda M. McManus (Born 1947) |
| Executive Vice President, Principal Executive | Vice President | Vice President, Senior Associate Treasurer |
| Officer, Associate Treasurer, and | Since 2004 | and Assistant Clerk |
| Compliance Liaison | Managing Director, Putnam Investments and | Since 2005 |
| Since 1989 | Putnam Management. During 2002, Chief | |
| Operating Officer, Atalanta/Sosnoff | Nancy E. Florek (Born 1957) | |
| Jonathan S. Horwitz (Born 1955) | Management Corporation | Vice President, Assistant Clerk, Assistant |
| Senior Vice President and Treasurer | Treasurer and Proxy Manager | |
| Since 2004 | Francis J. McNamara, III (Born 1955) | Since 2005 |
| Prior to 2004, Managing Director, | Vice President and Chief Legal Officer | |
| Putnam Investments | Since 2004 | |
| Senior Managing Director, Putnam | ||
| Steven D. Krichmar (Born 1958) | Investments, Putnam Management | |
| Vice President and Principal Financial Officer | and Putnam Retail Management. Prior | |
| Since 2002 | to 2004, General Counsel, State Street | |
| Senior Managing Director, | Research & Management Company | |
| Putnam Investments | ||
| Robert R. Leveille (Born 1969) | ||
| Janet C. Smith (Born 1965) | Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer | |
| Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer | Since 2007 | |
| and Assistant Treasurer | Managing Director, Putnam Investments, | |
| Since 2007 | Putnam Management, and Putnam Retail | |
| Managing Director, Putnam Investments and | Management. Prior to 2004, member of | |
| Putnam Management | Bell Boyd & Lloyd LLC. Prior to 2003, | |
| Vice President and Senior Counsel, | ||
| Susan G. Malloy (Born 1957) | Liberty Funds Group LLC | |
| Vice President and Assistant Treasurer | ||
| Since 2007 | Mark C. Trenchard (Born 1962) | |
| Managing Director, Putnam Investments | Vice President and BSA Compliance Officer | |
| Since 2002 | ||
| Beth S. Mazor (Born 1958) | Managing Director, Putnam Investments | |
| Vice President | ||
| Since 2002 | Judith Cohen (Born 1945) | |
| Managing Director, Putnam Investments | Vice President, Clerk and Assistant Treasurer | |
| Since 1993 | ||
The address of each Officer is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.
36
Fund information
Founded over 70 years ago, Putnam Investments was built around the concept that a balance between risk and reward is the hallmark of a well-rounded financial program. We manage nearly 100 mutual funds in growth, value, blend, fixed income, and international.
| Investment Manager | Officers | Judith Cohen |
| Putnam Investment | Charles E. Haldeman, Jr. | Vice President, Clerk and Assistant Treasurer |
| Management, LLC | President | |
| One Post Office Square | Wanda M. McManus | |
| Boston, MA 02109 | Charles E. Porter | Vice President, Senior Associate Treasurer |
| Executive Vice President, Principal | and Assistant Clerk | |
| Marketing Services | Executive Officer, Associate Treasurer | |
| Putnam Retail Management | and Compliance Liaison | Nancy E. Florek |
| One Post Office Square | Vice President, Assistant Clerk, | |
| Boston, MA 02109 | Jonathan S. Horwitz | Assistant Treasurer and Proxy Manager |
| Senior Vice President and Treasurer | ||
| Custodian | ||
| State Street Bank and Trust Company | Steven D. Krichmar | |
| Vice President and Principal Financial Officer | ||
| Legal Counsel | ||
| Ropes & Gray LLP | Janet C. Smith | |
| Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer | ||
| Independent Registered Public | and Assistant Treasurer | |
| Accounting Firm | ||
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | Susan G. Malloy | |
| Vice President and Assistant Treasurer | ||
| Trustees | ||
| John A. Hill, Chairman | Beth S. Mazor | |
| Jameson A. Baxter, Vice Chairman | Vice President | |
| Charles B. Curtis | ||
| Robert J. Darretta | James P. Pappas | |
| Myra R. Drucker | Vice President | |
| Charles E. Haldeman, Jr. | ||
| Paul L. Joskow | Francis J. McNamara, III | |
| Elizabeth T. Kennan | Vice President and Chief Legal Officer | |
| Kenneth R. Leibler | ||
| Robert E. Patterson | Robert R. Leveille | |
| George Putnam, III | Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer | |
| Richard B. Worley | ||
| Mark C. Trenchard | ||
| Vice President and BSA Compliance Officer | ||
This report is for the information of shareholders of Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund. It may also be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, the most recent copy of Putnam’s Quarterly Performance Summary, and Putnam’s Quarterly Ranking Summary. For more recent performance, please visit www.putnam.com. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund, which are described in its prospectus. For this and other information or to request a prospectus, call 1-800-225-1581 toll free. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-1581.
Item 2. Code of Ethics:
(a) The fund’s principal executive, financial and accounting officers are employees of Putnam Investment Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager. As such they are subject to a comprehensive Code of Ethics adopted and administered by Putnam Investments which is designed to protect the interests of the firm and its clients. The Fund has adopted a Code of Ethics which incorporates the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments with respect to all of its officers and Trustees who are employees of Putnam Investment Management, LLC. For this reason, the Fund has not adopted a separate code of ethics governing its principal executive, financial and accounting officers.
(c) In May 2008, the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investment Management, LLC was updated in its entirety to include the amendments adopted in August 2007 as well as a several additional technical, administrative and non-substantive changes.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert:
The Funds' Audit and Compliance Committee is comprised solely of Trustees who are "independent" (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the "Regulations")). The Trustees believe that each of the members of the Audit and Compliance Committee also possess a combination of knowledge and experience with respect to financial accounting matters, as well as other attributes, that qualify them for service on the Committee. In addition, the Trustees have determined that each of Mr. Patterson, Mr. Leibler, Mr. Hill and Mr. Darretta meets the financial literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange's rules and qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" (as such term has been defined by the Regulations) based on their review of his pertinent experience and education. Certain other Trustees, although not on the Audit and Compliance Committee, would also quali fy as "audit committee financial experts." The SEC has stated that the designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 of Form N-CSR does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the Audit and Compliance Committee and the Board of Trustees in the absence of such designation or identification.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services:
The following table presents fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for services rendered to the fund by the fund’s independent auditor:
| Fiscal | Audit- | |||
| year | Audit | Related | Tax | All Other |
| ended | Fees | Fees | Fees | Fees |
| July 31, 2008 | $70,406 | $-- | $3,864 | $195* |
| July 31, 2007 | $64,651 | $276 | $3,587 | $1,986* |
* Includes fees of $195 and $1,925 billed by the fund’s independent auditor to the fund for procedures necessitated by regulatory and litigation matters for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2008 and July 31, 2007, respectively. These fees were reimbursed to the fund by Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”).
For the fiscal years ended July 31, 2008 and July 31, 2007, the fund’s independent auditor billed aggregate non-audit fees in the amounts of $82,299 and $121,065 respectively, to the fund, Putnam Management and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Putnam Management that provides ongoing services to the fund.
Audit Fees represent fees billed for the fund's last two fiscal years relating to the audit and review of the financial statements included in annual reports and registration statements, and other services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-Related Fees represent fees billed in the fund’s last two fiscal years for services traditionally performed by the fund’s auditor, including accounting consultation for proposed transactions or concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and other audit or attest services not required by statute or regulation.
Tax Fees represent fees billed in the fund’s last two fiscal years for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice services. Tax planning and tax advice services include assistance with tax audits, employee benefit plans and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.
All Other Fees represent fees billed for services relating to an analysis of recordkeeping fees and procedures necessitated by regulatory and litigation matters.
Pre-Approval Policies of the Audit and Compliance Committee. The Audit and Compliance Committee of the Putnam funds has determined that, as a matter of policy, all work performed for the funds by the funds’ independent auditors will be pre-approved by the Committee itself and thus will generally not be subject to pre-approval procedures.
The Audit and Compliance Committee also has adopted a policy to pre-approve the engagement by Putnam Management and certain of its affiliates of the funds’ independent auditors, even in circumstances where pre-approval is not required by applicable law. Any such requests by Putnam Management or certain of its affiliates are typically submitted in writing to the Committee and explain, among other things, the nature of the proposed engagement, the estimated fees, and why this work should be performed by that particular audit firm as opposed to another one. In reviewing such requests, the Committee considers, among other things, whether the provision of such services by the audit firm are compatible with the independence of the audit firm.
The following table presents fees billed by the fund’s independent auditor for services required to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
| Fiscal | Audit- | All | Total | |
| year | Related | Tax | Other | Non-Audit |
| ended | Fees | Fees | Fees | Fees |
| July 31, 2008 | $ - | $15,000 | $ - | $ - |
| July 31, , 2007 | $ - | $ 26,129 | $ - | $ - |
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments:
The registrant’s schedule of investments in unaffiliated issuers is included in the report to shareholders in Item 1 above.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures For Closed-End Management Investment Companies:
Not applicable
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies
Not Applicable
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers:
Not applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:
Not applicable
Item 11. Controls and Procedures:
(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the design and operation of such procedures are generally effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting: Not applicable
Item 12. Exhibits:
(a)(1) The Code of Ethics of The Putnam Funds, which incorporates the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments, is filed herewith.
(a)(2) Separate certifications for the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.
(b) The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Janet C. Smith
Janet C. Smith
Principal Accounting Officer
Date: September 25, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Charles E. Porter
Charles E. Porter
Principal Executive Officer
Date: September 25, 2008
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Steven D. Krichmar
Steven D. Krichmar
Principal Financial Officer
Date: September 25, 2008