The following table presents information regarding yields on interest-earning assets, expense on interest-bearing liabilities, and net interest margin on average interest-earning assets for the periods indicated on a tax equivalent basis:
Changing interest rate environments, including the shape and level of the yield curve, could lead to lower net interest income, and competitive pricing pressure could lead to lower loan yields and fees.
Provision for Loan Loss. Bancorp recorded provisions for loan losses for the third quarters of 2005 and 2004 of $.4 million and $.2 million respectively. The increase in the provision was primarily due to an increase in net charge-offs in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the same quarter last year. Net charge offs for the third quarter of 2005 were $.6 million, compared to a net recovery of $73,000 for the same period in 2004. Annualized net charge offs for the third quarter 2005 were 0.15% of average loans, up from annualized net recoveries of 0.02% in the same period last year.
The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was $1.2 million compared to $2.1 million for the same period in 2004, a reduction in part caused by lower net charge offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 at $.5 million compared to $.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
The provision for loan loss is recorded to bring the allowance for loan losses to an amount considered appropriate by management based on factors which are described in the “Loan Portfolio and Credit Management” and “Allowance for Loan Losses” sections of this report. The provision for loan loss is highly dependent on our ability to manage asset quality and control the level of net charge-offs through prudent credit underwriting standards. In addition, a decline in general economic conditions could increase future provisions for loan loss.
Noninterest Income. Total non-interest income was $6.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of nearly 8% compared to $5.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004. The increase in non-interest income can be attributed to strong growth in payment system revenues of $.3 million or 30%, which includes debit card, interchange and merchant bankcard revenues. Moreover, trust and investment services revenue increased nearly 18% or $.2 million over the third quarter of 2004, while deposit service charge revenues were up $.4 million or 20% over the same period last year.
Total non-interest income was $16.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to $17.0 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in non-interest income can be primarily attributed to the impairment charge of $1.3 million pre-tax related to our investment in certain Freddie Mac preferred stock. Gains on sales of loans declined $.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 due to lower residential loan production volume. This decrease was more than offset by strong growth in trust revenue and payment systems related revenues. Service charges on deposit accounts increased 11%, or $.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to same period in 2004.
Changing interest rate environments, including the shape and level of the yield curve, could lead to decreases in fee income, including lower gains on sales of loans and reduced deposit service charges, two key components of our noninterest income. Also, increased competition and other competitive factors could adversely affect our ability to sustain fee generation from the sales of investment products and payment systems related revenue.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2005 was $18.4 million, an increase of $2.3 million or 14% compared to $16.1 million for the same period in 2004. Salary and benefit expense increased $1.3 million with the majority of the increase resulting from new lending and branch team members in late 2004 and increased variable compensation. Marketing expenses increased $.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period last year due to marketing expense associated with the totally free checking product in the Oregon market. Other non-interest expense increased in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 primarily due to increased check processing charges, loan origination expense, tax credit expense and losses on the disposition of fixed assets.
Total non-interest expense was $53.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to $46.6 million for the same period in 2004. Salary and benefit expense increased $3.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 resulting from new lending and branch team members in late 2004 and increased variable compensation. Occupancy expense increased $.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 due to additional branches and increases in rental rates. Strong growth in payment systems volumes increased payment system expense by 16% year to date in 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Professional fee expenses grew $.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 due to increased legal and accounting expenses, particularly in the first quarter of 2005. Marketing expenses increased $.9 million in 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 due to increased marketing costs associated with the free checking product in the Oregon market in 2005.
Income taxes. The provision for income taxes increased in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005, from the like periods in 2004, primarily due to an increase in income before taxes partly offset by the beneficial impact of a State corporate income tax credit of $.3 million. Bancorp’s effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2005 decreased slightly to 29.8% from 30.1% for the same period in 2004, primarily due to the State corporate income tax credit.
- 18 -
Balance Sheet Overview
Period end total assets increased to $1.93 billion as of September 30, 2005 from $1.79 billion at December 31, 2004. Our balance sheet growth has reflected our efforts in targeted areas that support our corporate objectives, including small business and middle market commercial lending, construction and home equity lending, as well as core deposit production.
Investment Portfolio
The investment portfolio at September 30, 2005, increased $8.1 million compared to December 31, 2004. At September 30, 2005, total investment securities available for sale had pre-tax net unrealized losses of $0.2 million. The composition and carrying value of Bancorp’s investment portfolio is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | | September 30, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Investments available for sale (At fair value) | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government agency securities | | $ | 89,740 | | $ | 82,362 | |
Corporate securities | | | 19,775 | | | 18,029 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 81,886 | | | 81,354 | |
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | | | 67,755 | | | 70,906 | |
Equity and other securities | | | 15,188 | | | 13,611 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total Investment Portfolio | | $ | 274,344 | | $ | 266,262 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
At March 31, 2005, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of approximately $803,000, after tax, or $.05 per fully diluted share, related to declines in the value of Freddie Mac preferred stock held in the Company’s available for sale investment portfolio. The Company owns 100,000 shares of Freddie Mac Preferred Series “L” stock that were acquired November 5, 1999, at a cost of $5,000,000, which was also the book value of these securities as of March 31, 2005, prior to the impairment charge. The market value of the securities as of that date was $3,684,000, and $3,655,000 as of September 30, 2005. The rate at which interest accrues on these shares resets every five years, most recently on December 31, 2004. The current interest rate of 3.58% is fixed until December 31, 2009, at which time it will reset to the 5 year treasury rate. The shares may be called at each reset date.
Loan Portfolio and Credit Management
Interest and fees earned on the loan portfolio is our primary source of revenue. Loans represented 78% of total assets, or $1.52 billion as of September 30, 2005, compared to 80% or $1.43 billion at December 31, 2004. A certain degree of credit risk is inherent in our lending activities. The Company manages the general risks inherent in the loan portfolio by following loan policies and underwriting practices designed to result in prudent lending activities. In addition, we attempt to manage our risk through our credit administration and credit review functions, which are designed to help ensure compliance with our credit standards. Through the credit review function the Company is able to monitor all credit-related policies and practices on a post approval basis, ensuring uniform application. The findings of these reviews are communicated with senior management and the Loan, Investment, and Asset/Liability Committee, which is made up of certain directors. As part of our ongoing lending process, internal risk ratings are assigned to each Commercial and Commercial Real Estate credit before the funds are extended to the customer. Credit risk ratings are based on apparent credit worthiness of the borrower at the time the loan is made. Large balance accounts have the credit risk rating reviewed on at least an annual basis. Credit files are examined periodically on a sample test basis, by internal and external auditors, as well as regulatory examiners.
Although a risk of nonpayment exists with respect to all loans, certain specific types of risks are associated with different types of loans. As a result of the nature of our customer base and the growth experienced in the market areas served, real estate is frequently a material component of collateral for the Company’s loans. The expected source of repayment of these loans is generally the cash flow of the project, operations of the borrower’s business, or personal income. Risks associated with real estate loans include decreasing land values, material increases in interest rates, deterioration in local economic conditions, changes in tax policies, and a concentration of loans within any one area.
- 19 -
As part of our strategic efforts, we have placed an emphasis on increasing the commercial and home equity loan segments of our portfolio. Our strategy has resulted in the loan portfolio being more interest rate sensitive, contributing to the elimination of the liability interest rate sensitive position of the overall balance sheet a few years back, as well as more diversified from a credit risk perspective. Commercial loans now represent 25% of the loan portfolio, compared to 16% at December 31, 2000, while commercial real estate loans have declined from 58% to less than 47% of the loan portfolio over the same time period. We believe our focus on commercial businesses is a key contributor to increasing low cost deposits.
The composition of Bancorp’s loan portfolio is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | | September 30, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent | |
Commercial | | $ | 374,054 | | | 24.7 | % | $ | 357,776 | | | 25.1 | % |
Real estate construction | | | 187,779 | | | 12.4 | % | | 116,974 | | | 8.2 | % |
Real estate mortgage | | | 218,511 | | | 14.4 | % | | 212,959 | | | 14.9 | % |
Real estate commercial | | | 707,032 | | | 46.6 | % | | 704,390 | | | 49.3 | % |
Installment and other consumer | | | 29,364 | | | 1.9 | % | | 35,895 | | | 2.5 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total loans | | | 1,516,740 | | | 100 | % | | 1,427,994 | | | 100 | % |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (19,728 | ) | | 1.30 | % | | (18,971 | ) | | 1.33 | % |
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Total loans, net | | $ | 1,497,012 | | | | | $ | 1,409,023 | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
The change in the composition of Bancorp’s loan portfolio, with increases in the percentage of loans that fall into commercial and real estate mortgage (home equity) categories, reflects the strategic focus of the Company.
The composition of commercial real estate loan types based on collateral is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | | September 30, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent | |
Office Buildings | | $ | 156,000 | | | 22.1 | % | $ | 155,600 | | | 22.1 | % |
Retail Facilities | | | 91,800 | | | 13.0 | % | | 89,900 | | | 12.8 | % |
Multi-Family - 5+ Residential | | | 65,400 | | | 9.2 | % | | 65,900 | | | 9.4 | % |
Hotels/Motels | | | 57,800 | | | 8.2 | % | | 62,900 | | | 8.9 | % |
Medical Offices | | | 44,100 | | | 6.2 | % | | 38,600 | | | 5.5 | % |
Industrial parks and related | | | 42,200 | | | 6.0 | % | | 37,000 | | | 5.3 | % |
Commercial/Agricultural | | | 30,400 | | | 4.3 | % | | 27,500 | | | 3.9 | % |
Assisted Living | | | 29,000 | | | 4.1 | % | | 39,600 | | | 5.6 | % |
Manufacturing Plants | | | 20,900 | | | 3.0 | % | | 21,200 | | | 3.0 | % |
Land Development and Raw Land | | | 18,700 | | | 2.6 | % | | 23,600 | | | 3.3 | % |
Food Establishments | | | 17,400 | | | 2.5 | % | | 18,900 | | | 2.7 | % |
Mini Storage | | | 16,300 | | | 2.3 | % | | 18,900 | | | 2.7 | % |
Health spa and gym | | | 11,800 | | | 1.7 | % | | 11,500 | | | 1.6 | % |
Church, Civic, Nonprofit facilities | | | 10,900 | | | 1.5 | % | | 10,000 | | | 1.4 | % |
RV Parks, Marinas, related | | | 8,000 | | | 1.1 | % | | 7,300 | | | 1.0 | % |
Other | | | 86,300 | | | 12.2 | % | | 76,000 | | | 10.8 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total real estate commercial loans | | $ | 707,000 | | | 100 | % | $ | 704,400 | | | 100 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Approximately 39% of Bancorp’s commercial real estate loan portfolio is classified as owner occupied. Bancorp’s underwriting of commercial real estate loans is conservative with loan to value ratios generally not exceeding 75% and debt service coverage ratios generally at 120% or better.
As of September 30, 2005, the Company had outstanding loans to persons serving as directors, officers, principal stockholders and their related interests. These loans, when made, are substantially on the same terms, including interest rates, maturities and collateral, as comparable loans made to other customers of the Company. At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Bancorp had no bankers acceptances.
- 20 -
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, other real estate owned, and loans past due more than 90 days. Interest income on loans is accrued daily on the principal balance outstanding. Generally, no interest is accrued on loans when factors indicate collection of interest or principal is doubtful or when the principal or interest payment becomes 90 days past due. Nonaccrual loans decreased $.2 million to $1.6 million at September 30, 2005 compared to December 31, 2004. The current nonaccrual loan balances are primarily a mix of commercial and commercial real estate secured loans. For nonaccrual loans, previously accrued but uncollected interest is charged against current earnings and income is only recognized to the extent payments are subsequently received.
Nonperforming assets consist of the following:
(Dollars in thousands) | | September 30, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 | |
| |
| |
| |
Loans on nonaccrual status | | $ | 1,568 | | $ | 1,803 | |
Loans past due greater than 90 days not on nonaccrual status | | | — | | | — | |
Other real estate owned | | | 98 | | | 384 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total nonperforming assets | | $ | 1,666 | | $ | 2,187 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Non-performing loans to total loans | | | 0.10 | % | | 0.13 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans | | | 1258 | % | | 1052 | % |
Non-performing assets to total assets | | | 0.09 | % | | 0.12 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing assets | | | 1184 | % | | 867 | % |
At September 30, 2005, non-performing assets were $1.7 million or 0.09% of total assets, down from $4.9 million or 0.28% one year earlier. Bancorp’s allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.30% at September 30, 2005, down from 1.47% at September 30, 2004.
- 21 -
Allowance for Loan Losses
Please see the Company’s 2004 10-K under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Loan Loss Allowance and Provision” for a discussion of Bancorp’s methodologies underlying the calculation of the Company’s allowance for loan losses.
At September 30, 2005, the Company’s allowance for loan losses was $19.7 million, consisting of a $17.4 million formula allowance, a $1.0 million specific allowance, and a $1.3 million unallocated allowance. At December 31, 2004, our allowance for loan losses was $19.0 million, consisting of a $17.3 million formula allowance, a $.3 million specific allowance, and a $1.4 million unallocated allowance. The changes in the allocation of the allowance for loan losses in the first nine months of 2005 were due primarily to changes in the loan portfolio and its mix, changes in the risk grading of our loans, and charge-offs as well as recovery activity. In addition, net overdraft losses are included in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses per the guidance provided by regulatory authorities earlier in 2005, “Joint Guidance on Overdraft Protection Programs.”
At September 30, 2005, Bancorp’s allowance for loan loss was 1.30% of total loans, and 1258% of total nonperforming loans, compared with an allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2004 of 1.33% of total loans, and 1052% of total nonperforming loans, respectively.
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are as follows for the year to date September 30, 2005, and full year ended 2004, respectively:
(Dollars in thousands) | | Nine months ended September 30, 2005 | | Year ended December 31, 2004 | |
| |
| |
| |
Loans outstanding at end of period | | $ | 1,516,740 | | $ | 1,427,994 | |
Average loans outstanding during the period | | $ | 1,462,751 | | $ | 1,301,447 | |
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period | | $ | 18,971 | | $ | 18,131 | |
Loans charged off: | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | (572 | ) | | (1,149 | ) |
Real Estate | | | (1 | ) | | (527 | ) |
Installment and consumer | | | (396 | ) | | (698 | ) |
Overdraft | | | (243 | ) | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total loans charged off | | | (1,212 | ) | | (2,374 | ) |
Recoveries: | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | 359 | | | 438 | |
Real Estate | | | 106 | | | 340 | |
Installment and consumer | | | 229 | | | 176 | |
Overdraft | | | 50 | | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total recoveries | | | 744 | | | 954 | |
Net loans recovered (charged off) | | | (468 | ) | | (1,420 | ) |
Provision for loan losses | | | 1,225 | | | 2,260 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for loan losses, end of period | | $ | 19,728 | | $ | 18,971 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ratio of net loans charged off to average loans outstanding year to date (1) | | | 0.04 | % | | 0.11 | % |
During the first nine months of 2005, net loan charge offs were $.5 million, compared to $.8 million in charge offs for the same period in 2004. The annualized percentage of net loans charged off year to date to average loans outstanding was 0.04% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to 0.09% in the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Charged off loans reflect the realization of losses in the portfolio that were recognized previously through the provision for loan losses.
- 22 -
Deposits and Borrowings
The following table summarizes the quarterly average amount of, and the average interest rate paid on, each of the deposit and borrowing categories for the periods shown.
| | Third Quarter 2005 | | Third Quarter 2004 | |
| |
| |
| |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Quarterly Average Balance | | Rate Paid | | Quarterly Average Balance | | Rate Paid | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Demand | | $ | 442,922 | | | — | | $ | 372,280 | | | — | |
Savings, money market and interest bearing demand | | | 790,375 | | | 1.39 | % | | 736,897 | | | 0.43 | % |
Certificates of deposit | | | 373,197 | | | 2.98 | % | | 341,330 | | | 2.25 | % |
Short-term borrowings | | | 1,277 | | | 3.97 | % | | 10,782 | | | 1.41 | % |
Long-term borrowings (1) | | | 111,500 | | | 4.62 | % | | 113,946 | | | 6.07 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total deposits and borrowings | | $ | 1,719,271 | | | 2.14 | % | $ | 1,575,235 | | | 1.49 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
(1) Long-term borrowings include junior subordinated debentures. |
Quarterly average core deposits, consisting of demand, savings, money market, and interest bearing demand deposits, increased 11% or $124 million in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Our deposits increase was mainly due to the combination of more marketing towards low cost deposit categories and improved sales practices by the branches and commercial teams resulting in both consumer and business deposit growth.
Third quarter average time deposits increased $32 million or 9% in 2005 compared to 2004, as higher market interest rates increased demand for time deposits. The Company believes interest bearing deposits such as money market and time deposits can be generated with competitive interest rate pricing of such deposits.
Long-term borrowing rates have declined as a result of refinancings of higher rate borrowings over the last 12 months as well as new borrowings replacing maturing borrowings at lower rates.
- 23 -
Capital Resources
The Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) have established minimum requirements for capital adequacy for bank holding companies and member banks. The requirements address both risk-based capital and leveraged capital. The regulatory agencies may establish higher minimum requirements if, for example, a corporation has previously received special attention or has a high susceptibility to interest rate risk. The FRB and FDIC risk-based capital guidelines require banks and bank holding companies to have a ratio of tier one capital to total risk-weighted assets of at least 4%, and a ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets of 8% or greater. In addition, the leverage ratio of tier one capital to total assets less intangibles is required to be at least 3%. As of September 30, 2005, Bancorp and the Bank are considered “Well Capitalized” under the regulatory risk based capital guidelines.
| | September 30, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 | |
| |
| |
| |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Actual Amount | | Ratio | | Amount Required For Minimum Capital Adequacy Amount | | Percent required for Minimum Capital Adequacy | | Actual Amount | | Ratio | | Amount Required For Minimum Capital Adequacy Amount | | Percent required for Minimum Capital Adequacy | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Tier 1 Capital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
West Coast Bancorp | | $ | 180,828 | | | 10.05 | % | $ | 71,937 | | | 4 | % | $ | 172,366 | | | 10.40 | % | $ | 66,281 | | | 4 | % |
West Coast Bank | | | 171,359 | | | 9.54 | % | | 71,842 | | | 4 | % | | 165,286 | | | 9.99 | % | | 66,215 | | | 4 | % |
Total Capital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
West Coast Bancorp | | $ | 200,556 | | | 11.15 | % | $ | 143,874 | | | 8 | % | $ | 191,337 | | | 11.55 | % | $ | 132,561 | | | 8 | % |
West Coast Bank | | | 191,086 | | | 10.64 | % | | 143,685 | | | 8 | % | | 184,257 | | | 11.13 | % | | 132,431 | | | 8 | % |
Risk weighted assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
West Coast Bancorp | | $ | 1,798,421 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,657,013 | | | | | | | | | | |
West Coast Bank | | | 1,796,060 | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,655,383 | | | | | | | | | | |
Leverage Ratio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
West Coast Bancorp | | $ | 180,828 | | | 9.59 | % | $ | 56,568 | | | 3 | % | $ | 172,366 | | | 9.72 | % | $ | 53,215 | | | 3 | % |
West Coast Bank | | | 171,359 | | | 9.09 | % | | 56,549 | | | 3 | % | | 165,286 | | | 9.32 | % | | 53,178 | | | 3 | % |
Average total assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
West Coast Bancorp | | $ | 1,885,614 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,773,848 | | | | | | | | | | |
West Coast Bank | | | 1,884,976 | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,772,617 | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes the consolidated risk based capital ratios of Bancorp and the Bank at September 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004.
- 24 -
Stockholders’ equity increased to $155.0 million at September 30, 2005, up from $147.9 million at December 31, 2004. The increase was due to net income, restricted stock grants and stock option exercises, including tax benefits associated with those option exercises, offset in part by Bancorp’s activity in its corporate stock repurchase program, dividends to shareholders and unrealized losses on investment securities.
In July 2000, Bancorp announced a corporate stock repurchase program that was expanded in September 2000, September 2001, September 2002, and again in April 2004. Under this plan, the Company can buy up to 3.88 million shares of the Company’s common stock, including completed purchases. The Company anticipates using existing funds, future net income, and/or long-term borrowings to finance future repurchases. During the first nine months of 2005, and consistent with its capital plan, the Company repurchased approximately 381,400 shares, or approximately 3% of its common shares pursuant to its corporate stock repurchase program. Total shares available for repurchase under this plan were 455,000 at September 30, 2005.
The following table presents information with respect to Bancorp’s stock repurchases.
(Shares and dollars in thousands, other than per share amounts) | | Shares repurchased related to stock options and restricted stock | | Shares repurchased as part of the corporate stock repurchase plan | | Total shares repurchased in the period | | Total cost of shares repurchased | | Average total cost per share | | Period end shares available for repurchase as part of the corporate stock repurchase plan | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Year ended 2000 | | | 15 | | | 573 | | | 588 | | $ | 5,454 | | $ | 9.28 | | | 1,307 | |
Year ended 2001 | | | 28 | | | 534 | | | 562 | | | 6,879 | | | 12.24 | | | 773 | |
Year ended 2002 | | | 35 | | | 866 | | | 901 | | | 13,571 | | | 15.06 | | | 907 | |
Year ended 2003 | | | 29 | | | 587 | | | 616 | | | 10,927 | | | 17.74 | | | 320 | |
Year ended 2004 | | | 49 | | | 484 | | | 533 | | | 11,502 | | | 21.58 | | | 836 | |
YTD ended Sept. 30, 2005 | | | 40 | | | 381 | | | 421 | | | 10,098 | | | 23.99 | | | 455 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
Total | | | 196 | | | 3,425 | | | 3,621 | | $ | 58,431 | | $ | 16.14 | | | | |
Please also see discussion of stock repurchase activity during the quarter ended September 30, 2005, under Part II, Item 2, “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds” below.
Liquidity and Sources of Funds
The Company’s primary sources of funds are customer deposits, maturities of investment securities, sales of “Available for Sale” securities, loan sales, loan repayments, net income, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), and the use of Federal Funds markets. The holding company specifically relies on dividends from the Bank and proceeds from the issuance of trust preferred securities to fund dividends to stockholders and stock repurchases.
Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and unscheduled loan prepayments are not. Deposit inflows and unscheduled loan prepayments are influenced by general interest rate levels, interest rates available on other investments, competition, economic conditions, and other factors.
Deposits are the primary source of new funds. Total deposits were $1.64 billion at September 30, 2005, up from $1.47 billion at December 31, 2004. While brokered deposits may be used in the future, we have none outstanding at September 30, 2005. We attempt to attract deposits in our market areas through competitive pricing and delivery of quality products.
At September 30, 2005, four wholly-owned subsidiary grantor trusts established by Bancorp had issued $26 million of pooled trust preferred securities. For a further discussion of the amount and terms of the pooled trust preferred securities, see Bancorp’s 2004 10-K under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Liquidity and Sources of Funds.”
Management expects to continue relying on customer deposits, cash flow from investment securities, sales of “Available for Sale” securities, loan sales, loan repayments, net income, Federal Funds markets, advances from the FHLB, and other borrowings to provide liquidity. Management may also consider engaging in further offerings of trust preferred securities if the opportunity presents an attractive means of raising funds in the future. Although deposit balances at times have shown historical growth, such balances may be influenced by changes in the financial services industry, interest rates available on other investments, general economic conditions, competition, customer management of cash resources and other factors. Borrowings may be used on a short-term and long-term basis to compensate for reductions in other sources of funds. Borrowings may also be used on a long-term basis to support expanded lending activities and to match maturities, duration, or repricing intervals of assets. The sources of such funds may include, but are not limited to, Federal Funds purchased, reverse repurchase agreements and borrowings from the FHLB.
- 25 -
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There has not been any material change in the market risk disclosure from that contained in the Company’s 2004 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information the Company must disclose in its reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis. Our management has evaluated, with the participation and under the supervision of our chief executive officer (“CEO”) and chief financial officer (“CFO”), the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of such date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in reports that it files under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
- 26 -
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
Bancorp is periodically party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on information currently known to management, we do not believe there is any legal action to which Bancorp or any of its subsidiaries is a party that, individually or in the aggregate, will have a materially adverse effect on Bancorp’s financial condition and results of operations.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
| (c) The following table provides information about repurchases of common stock by the Company during the quarter ended September 30, 2005: |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) | | Maximum Number of Shares Remaining at Period End that May Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
7/1/05 – 7/31/05 | | | 15,243 | | $ | 24.57 | | | 11,700 | | | 571,221 | |
8/1/05 – 8/31/05 | | | 58,336 | | $ | 26.02 | | | 58,100 | | | 513,121 | |
9/1/05 – 9/30/05 | | | 58,823 | | $ | 25.73 | | | 58,300 | | | 454,821 | |
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Total for quarter | | | 132,402 | | | | | | 128,100 | | | | |
|
|
| (1) | Shares repurchased by Bancorp during the quarter include: (a) shares repurchased pursuant to the Company’s corporate stock repurchase program publicly announced in July 2000 (the “Repurchase Program”) and described in footnote 2 below, and (b) shares repurchased from employees in connection with stock option swap exercises and cancellation of restricted stock to pay withholding taxes totaling 3,543 shares, 236 shares, and 523 shares, respectively, for the periods indicated. |
| | |
| (2) | Under the Repurchase Program, the board of directors originally authorized the Company to repurchase up to 330,000 common shares, which amount was increased by 550,000 shares in September 2000, by 1.0 million in September 2001, by 1.0 million shares in September 2002, and 1.0 million in April 2004, for a total authorized repurchase amount as of September 30, 2005, of approximately 3.9 million shares. |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
| |
| None |
| |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
| |
| None |
| |
Item 5. | Other Information |
| |
| West Coast Bancorp established itself as a financial holding company in the third quarter of 2005 in order to have more flexibility in the products and services it provides through its subsidiaries. |
| |
Item 6. | Exhibits |
| |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit |
|
| |
|
| 10.1 | | Amendment No. 1 dated September 21, 2005, to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan adopted by West Coast Bank and the Company for the benefit of James D. Bygland. |
| 10.2 | | Amendment No. 1 dated September 22, 2005, to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan adopted by West Coast Bank and the Company for the benefit of Anders Giltvedt. |
| 10.3 | | Amendment No. 1 dated September 22, 2005, to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan adopted by West Coast Bank and the Company for the benefit of Xandra McKeown. |
| 10.4 | | Amendment No. 1 dated September 21, 2005, to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan adopted by West Coast Bank and the Company for the benefit of David L. Prysock. |
| 10.5 | | Amendment No. 1 dated September 22, 2005, to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan adopted by West Coast Bank and the Company for the benefit of Robert D. Sznewajs. |
| 31.1 | | Certification of CEO under Rule 13(a) – 14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
| 31.2 | | Certification of CFO under Rule 13(a) – 14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
| 32 | | Certification of CEO and CFO under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
- 27 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| WEST COAST BANCORP |
| (Registrant) |
| |
| |
Dated: November 15, 2005 | /s/ Robert D. Sznewajs |
|
|
| Robert D. Sznewajs |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| |
| |
Dated: November 15, 2005 | /s/ Anders Giltvedt |
|
|
| Anders Giltvedt |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
- 28 -