First Charter 10-Q 2006 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 0-15829

FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

North Carolina	56-1355866
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)	Identification No.)
10200 David Taylor Drive, Charlotte, NC	28262-2373
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(704) 688-4300

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ      Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filero           Accelerated Filerþ           Non-Accelerated Filero

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yeso      Noþ

As of November 8, 2006, the Registrant had outstanding 34,312,472 shares of Common Stock, no par value.

First Charter Corporation
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

All reports filed electronically by First Charter Corporation with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments to those reports, are accessible at no cost on the Corporations’ Web site at www.firstcharter.com. These filings are also accessible on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Part I – Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Consolidated Balance Sheets		3
	Consolidated Statements of Income		4
	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity		5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		20
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		44
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		44
Part II
Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		46
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		46
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		46
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		46
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		46
Item 5.	Other Information		47
Item 6.	Exhibits		47
Signature			49
EX-10.2
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

2

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

First Charter Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

	September 30			December 31
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)	2006			2005
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	76,215		$	119,080
Federal funds sold		33,690			2,474
Interest-bearing bank deposits		2,999			3,998
Cash and cash equivalents		112,904			125,552
Securities available for sale (cost of $912,635 and $917,710; carrying amount of pledged collateral $546,576 and $557,132)		899,120			899,111
Loans held for sale		10,923			6,447
Portfolio loans		3,091,820			2,945,918
Unearned income		(37	)		(173	)
Allowance for loan losses		(29,919	)		(28,725	)
Portfolio loans, net		3,061,864			2,917,020
Premises and equipment, net		106,918			106,773
Goodwill and other intangible assets		22,088			21,897
Other assets		170,851			155,620
Total assets	$	4,384,668		$	4,232,420
Liabilities
Deposits, domestic
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	452,853		$	429,758
Interest bearing		2,502,001			2,369,721
Total deposits		2,954,854			2,799,479
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		199,343			312,283
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings		144,645			198,432
Long-term debt		687,810			557,859
Accured expenses and other liabilities		45,442			40,772
Total liabilities		4,032,094			3,908,825
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock — no par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock — no par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 31,200,883 and 30,736,936 shares at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively		141,173			133,408
Common stock held in Rabbi Trust for deferred compensation		(1,087	)		(893	)
Deferred compensation payable in common stock		1,087			893
Retained earnings		219,580			201,442
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(8,179	)		(11,255	)
Total shareholders’ equity		352,574			323,595
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	4,384,668		$	4,232,420

See notes to consolidated financial statements

3

First Charter Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30					September 30
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)	2006			2005		2006			2005
Interest income
Loans	$	56,916		$	45,892	$	161,299		$	124,303
Securities		10,021			13,135		28,854			41,520
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing bank deposits		148			53		320			143
Total interest income		67,085			59,080		190,473			165,966
Interest expense
Deposits		22,131			14,487		57,036			37,211
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		2,604			3,484		8,525			7,611
Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowings		9,392			10,019		27,217			28,190
Total interest expense		34,127			27,990		92,778			73,012
Net interest income		32,958			31,090		97,695			92,954
Provision for loan losses		1,405			2,770		3,804			7,548
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		31,553			28,320		93,891			85,406
Noninterest income
Service charges on deposits		7,353			7,321		21,520			20,618
Wealth management		1,492			1,358		4,691			4,534
Securities gains (losses), net		(5,860	)		12		(5,828	)		(19	)
Gain on sale of deposits and loans		2,825			—		2,825			—
Equity method investments gains (losses), net		3,415			29		3,971			(203	)
Mortgage services		902			873		2,626			2,084
Brokerage services		847			888		2,250			2,483
Insurance services		2,937			2,796		10,084			9,407
Bank owned life insurance		722			863		2,399			3,452
Property sale gains, net		408			566		596			1,283
ATM, debit, and merchant fees		2,182			1,723		6,197			4,892
Other		661			614		2,034			1,643
Total noninterest income		17,884			17,043		53,365			50,174
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		16,532			15,901		51,049			47,378
Occupancy and equipment		4,272			4,344		13,929			13,412
Data processing		1,510			1,310		4,454			3,964
Marketing		1,255			1,076		3,739			3,221
Postage and supplies		1,223			1,092		3,782			3,487
Professional services		2,476			2,064		6,731			5,961
Telephone		570			537		1,677			1,616
Amortization of intangibles		160			128		464			385
Foreclosed properties		21			116		493			331
Other		2,349			2,375		6,998			7,421
Total noninterest expense		30,368			28,943		93,316			87,176
Income before income tax expense		19,069			16,420		53,940			48,404
Income tax expense		6,288			4,368		18,169			14,763
Net income	$	12,781		$	12,052	$	35,771		$	33,641
Net income per common share
Basic	$	0.41		$	0.39	$	1.16		$	1.11
Diluted	$	0.41		$	0.39	$	1.14		$	1.10
Average common shares outstanding
Basic		31,056,059			30,575,440		30,937,922			30,383,039
Diluted		31,426,563			30,891,887		31,310,939			30,704,138
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.195		$	0.19	$	0.58		$	0.57

See notes to consolidated financial statements

4

First Charter Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

					Common Stock
					in Rabbi			Deferred					Accumulated
					Trust for			Compensation					Other
	Common Stock				Deferred			Payable in		Retained			Comprehensive
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)	Shares		Amount		Compensation			Common Stock		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Total
Balance, December 31, 2004		30,054,256	$	121,464	$	(808	)	$	808	$	198,085		$	(4,862	)	$	314,687
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		—			—		33,641			—			33,641
Change in unrealized gains and losses on securities, net of reclassificiation adjustment for net losses included in net income		—		—		—			—		—			(10,200	)		(10,200	)
Total comprehensive income																	23,441
Common stock purchased by Rabbi Trust for deferred compensation		—		—		(69	)		—		—			—			(69	)
Deferred compensation payable in common stock		—		—		—			69		—			—			69
Cash dividends declared, $.57 per share		—		—		—			—		(16,532	)		—			(16,532	)
Issuance of shares under stock-based compensation plans, including related tax effects		539,462		9,365		—			—		—			—			9,365
Issuance of shares pursuant to acquisition		3,117		84		—			—		—			—			84
Balance, September 30, 2005		30,596,835	$	130,913	$	(877	)	$	877	$	215,194		$	(15,062	)	$	331,045
Balance, December 31, 2005		30,736,936	$	133,408	$	(893	)	$	893	$	201,442		$	(11,255	)	$	323,595
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		—			—		35,771			—			35,771
Change in unrealized gains and losses on securities, net of reclassificiation adjustment for net losses included in net income		—		—		—			—		—			3,076			3,076
Total comprehensive income																	38,847
Common stock purchased by Rabbi Trust for deferred compensation		—		—		(194	)		—		—			—			(194	)
Deferred compensation payable in common stock		—		—		—			194		—			—			194
Cash dividends declared, $.58 per share		—		—		—			—		(17,633	)		—			(17,633	)
Issuance of shares under stock-based compensation plans, including related tax effects		449,484		7,403		—			—		—			—			7,403
Issuance of shares pursuant to acquisition		14,463		362		—			—		—			—			362
Balance, September 30, 2006		31,200,883	$	141,173	$	(1,087	)	$	1,087	$	219,580		$	(8,179	)	$	352,574

See notes to consolidated financial statements

5

First Charter Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30
(In thousands)	2006			2005
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	35,771		$	33,641
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		3,804			7,548
Depreciation		6,565			6,998
Amortization of intangibles		464			385
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights		296			401
Stock-based compensation expense		1,535			144
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans		(328	)		—
Premium amortization and discount accretion, net		853			1,929
Securities losses, net		5,828			19
Net gains (losses) on sales of other real estate owned		(135	)		88
Write-downs on other real estate owned		388			128
Equipment sale gains, net		(15	)		—
Gain on sale of deposits and loans		(2,825	)		—
Equity method investment (gains) losses, net		(3,971	)		203
Gains on sales of loans held for sale		(1,179	)		(1,078	)
Property sale gains, net		(596	)		(1,283	)
Bank-owned life insurance claims		—			(935	)
Origination of loans held for sale		(147,249	)		(112,051	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		143,952			111,146
Change in cash surrender value of life insurance		(2,446	)		(1,866	)
Change in other assets		(1,388	)		(4,776	)
Change in other liabilities		4,369			(6,288	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		43,693			34,353
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		187,823			173,570
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available for sale		70,394			139,941
Purchases of securities available for sale		(259,970	)		(53,812	)
Net change in loans		(143,941	)		(501,432	)
Loans sold in branch sale		(8,078	)		—
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		2,640			3,694
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance		(10,000	)		—
Proceeds from equity method distributions		3,682			—
Net purchases of premises and equipment		(6,695	)		(13,359	)
Cash paid in business acquisition		(222	)		(212	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(164,367	)		(251,610	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase in deposits		117,333			263,149
Deposits sold in branch sale		38,042			—
Net change in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		(112,940	)		195,793
Net decrease in commercial paper and other short-term borrowings		(53,787	)		(152,408	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and trust preferred securities		265,000			186,857
Retirement of long-term debt		(135,049	)		(235,039	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		6,069			9,101
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans		328			—
Cash dividends paid		(16,970	)		(16,836	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		108,026			250,617
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(12,648	)		33,360
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		125,552			98,011
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	112,904		$	131,371
Supplemental information
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	89,773		$	69,116
Income taxes		14,330			21,624
Non-cash items:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned		3,370			6,057
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale (net of tax expense (benefit) of $2,008 and ($6,720), respectively)		3,076			(10,200	)
Issuance of common stock in business acquisition		362			84
1035 exchange of bank-owned life insurance		21,541			—

See notes to consolidated financial statements

6

First Charter Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

First Charter Corporation (First Charter or the Corporation), headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, is a regional financial services company with assets of $4.4 billion and is the holding company for First Charter Bank. As of September 30, 2006, First Charter operated 56 financial centers, four insurance offices, and 136 ATMs throughout North Carolina. First Charter also operates loan origination offices in Asheville, North Carolina and Reston, Virginia. First Charter provides businesses and individuals with a broad range of financial services, including banking, financial planning, wealth management, investments, insurance, mortgages, and a full array of employee benefit programs. The results of operations of the Bank constitute the substantial majority of the consolidated net income, revenue, and assets of the Corporation.

1. Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank, and variable interest entities (VIEs) where the Corporation is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The information contained in these interim consolidated financial statements, excluding information as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, is unaudited. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The information furnished in this report reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the financial condition and the results of operations for interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Certain amounts reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity as previously reported.

The significant accounting policies followed by the Corporation are presented on pages 59 to 67 of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. With the exception of the Corporation’s policy regarding stock-based compensation adopted January 1, 2006, these policies have not materially changed from the disclosure in that report.

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (SFAS 123(R)),Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25),Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Corporation adopted SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006, with no material effect on its consolidated financial statements. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. If the vesting terms are not met, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed. The Corporation previously accounted for stock-based compensation under the provisions of APB 25. As permitted under SFAS No. 123(R), the Corporation adopted the “modified prospective” method on January 1, 2006. In accordance with the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized as a component of salary and employee benefits expense in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on January 1, 2006 (a) based on the requirements of SFAS 123(R) for all share-based

7

payments granted after January 1, 2006 and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to January 1, 2006 that remained unvested as of that date.

2. Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if the Corporation’s potential common stock and contingently issuable shares, which consist of dilutive stock options and restricted stock, were issued.

A reconciliation of the basic average common shares outstanding to the diluted average common shares outstanding follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30				September 30
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding		31,056,059		30,575,440		30,937,922		30,383,039
Dilutive effect arising from potential common stock issuances		370,504		316,447		373,017		321,099
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding		31,426,563		30,891,887		31,310,939		30,704,138

The effects of outstanding anti-dilutive stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share. These amounts were 944,000 and 255,000 shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and 800,000 and 1.2 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively.

3. Business Segment Information

The Corporation operates one reportable segment, the Bank, the Corporation’s primary banking subsidiary. The Bank provides businesses and individuals with commercial, consumer and mortgage loans, deposit banking services, brokerage services, insurance products, and comprehensive financial planning solutions to individual and commercial clients. The results of the Bank’s operations constitute a substantial majority of the consolidated net income, revenue and assets of the Corporation. Intercompany transactions and the parent company’s revenue, expenses, assets (including cash, investment securities, and investments in venture capital limited partnerships) and liabilities (including commercial paper and subordinated debentures) are included in the “Other” category.

Information regarding the separate results of operations and assets for the Bank and Other for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 follows:

8

Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
									Consolidated
(In thousands)	The Bank		Other			Eliminations			Total
Interest income	$	66,868	$	217		$	—		$	67,085
Interest expense		32,872		1,255			—			34,127
Net interest income (expense)		33,996		(1,038	)		—			32,958
Provision for loan losses		1,405		—			—			1,405
Noninterest income		14,612		3,272			—			17,884
Noninterest expense		30,320		48			—			30,368
Income before taxes		16,883		2,186			—			19,069
Income tax expense		5,544		744			—			6,288
Net income	$	11,339	$	1,442		$	—		$	12,781
Total loans	$	3,072,787	$	—		$	—		$	3,072,787
Total assets		4,363,022		432,655			(411,009	)		4,384,668

Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
									Consolidated
(In thousands)	The Bank		Other			Eliminations			Total
Interest income	$	59,062	$	18		$	—		$	59,080
Interest expense		27,292		698			—			27,990
Net interest income (expense)		31,770		(680	)		—			31,090
Provision for loan losses		2,770		—			—			2,770
Noninterest income		17,000		43			—			17,043
Noninterest expense		28,888		55			—			28,943
Income (loss) before taxes		17,112		(692	)		—			16,420
Income tax expense (benefit)		4,569		(201	)		—			4,368
Net income (loss)	$	12,543	$	(491	)	$	—		$	12,052
Total loans	$	2,907,666	$	—		$	—		$	2,907,666
Total assets		4,685,649		426,229			(412,156	)		4,699,722

9

Information regarding the separate results of operations and assets for the Bank and Other for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 follows:

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
									Consolidated
(In thousands)	The Bank		Other			Eliminations			Total
Interest income	$	190,148	$	325		$	—		$	190,473
Interest expense		89,283		3,495			—			92,778
Net interest income (expense)		100,865		(3,170	)		—			97,695
Provision for loan losses		3,804		—			—			3,804
Noninterest income		50,014		3,351			—			53,365
Noninterest expense		93,165		151			—			93,316
Income before taxes		53,910		30			—			53,940
Income tax expense		18,159		10			—			18,169
Net income	$	35,751	$	20		$	—		$	35,771
Total loans	$	3,072,787	$	—		$	—		$	3,072,787
Total assets		4,363,022		432,655			(411,009	)		4,384,668

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
									Consolidated
(In thousands)	The Bank		Other			Eliminations			Total
Interest income	$	165,929	$	37		$	—		$	165,966
Interest expense		71,816		1,196			—			73,012
Net interest income (expense)		94,113		(1,159	)		—			92,954
Provision for loan losses		7,548		—			—			7,548
Noninterest income		50,062		112			—			50,174
Noninterest expense		87,015		161			—			87,176
Income (loss) before taxes		49,612		(1,208	)		—			48,404
Income tax expense (benefit)		15,132		(369	)		—			14,763
Net income (loss)	$	34,480	$	(839	)	$	—		$	33,641
Total loans	$	2,907,666	$	—		$	—		$	2,907,666
Total assets		4,685,649		426,229			(412,156	)		4,699,722

4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

A summary of the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of amortized intangible assets and the net carrying amount of unamortized intangible assets follows:

	September 30, 2006						December 31, 2005
	Gross Carrying		Accumulated		Net Carrying		Gross Carrying		Accumulated		Net Carrying
(In thousands)	Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amount		Amortization		Amount
Amortized intangible assets:
Noncompete agreements	$	90	$	55	$	35	$	90	$	33	$	57
Customer lists		2,961		1,392		1,569		2,675		997		1,678
Other intangibles(1)		379		174		205		379		127		252
Total	$	3,430	$	1,621	$	1,809	$	3,144	$	1,157	$	1,987
Unamortized intangible assets:
Goodwill	$	20,279	$	—	$	20,279	$	19,910	$	—	$	19,910

⁽¹⁾ Other intangibles include trade name and proprietary software

The gross carrying amount of customer lists increased to $3.0 million at September 30, 2006 from $2.7 million at December 31, 2005, and goodwill increased to $20.3 million at September 30, 2006 from $19.9 million at December 31, 2005. The increase was due to payments made based on the 2005 performance of an insurance agency acquired in 2004.

Amortization expense totaled $160,000 and $464,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and $128,000 and $385,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively.

10

Expected amortization expense on finite-lived intangible assets follows:

	Noncompete		Customer		Other
(In thousands)	Agreements		Lists		Intangibles		Total
October — December 2006	$	7	$	135	$	15	$	157
2007		28		471		54		553
2008		—		362		46		408
2009		—		253		36		289
2010		—		147		27		174
2011 and after		—		201		27		228
Total intangibles amortization	$	35	$	1,569	$	205	$	1,809

5. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is defined as the change in shareholders’ equity from all transactions other than those with shareholders, and it includes net income and other comprehensive income.

The components of comprehensive income follow:

	Nine Months Ended September 30
	2006									2005
													Tax
	Pretax			Tax Expense			After-tax			Pretax			Expense			After-tax
(In thousands)	Amount			(Benefit)			Amount			Amount			(Benefit)			Amount
Comprehensive income
Net income	$	53,940		$	18,169		$	35,771		$	48,404		$	14,763		$	33,641
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities:
Net unrealized losses for the period		(744	)		(293	)		(451	)		(16,939	)		(6,729	)		(10,210	)
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income		(5,828	)		(2,301	)		(3,527	)		(19	)		(9	)		(10	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		5,084			2,008			3,076			(16,920	)		(6,720	)		(10,200	)
Total comprehensive income	$	59,024		$	20,177		$	38,847		$	31,484		$	8,043		$	23,441
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at January 1	$	(18,599	)	$	(7,344	)	$	(11,255	)	$	(7,971	)	$	(3,109	)	$	(4,862	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		5,084			2,008			3,076			(16,920	)		(6,720	)		(10,200	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at September 30	$	(13,515	)	$	(5,336	)	$	(8,179	)	$	(24,891	)	$	(9,829	)	$	(15,062	)

11

6. Securities Available for Sale

Securities available for sale follow:

	September 30, 2006
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
(In thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
U.S. government obligations	$	14,987	$	—	$	22	$	14,965
U.S. government agency obligations		270,947		2		4,072		266,877
Mortgage-backed securities		436,948		289		10,355		426,882
State, county, and municipal obligations		96,810		774		433		97,151
Asset-backed securities		44,014		5		80		43,939
Equity securities		48,929		377		—		49,306
Total securities	$	912,635	$	1,447	$	14,962	$	899,120
	December 31, 2005
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
(In thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
U.S. government obligations	$	14,905	$	—	$	27	$	14,878
U.S. government agency obligations		327,418		21		7,032		320,407
Mortgage-backed securities		417,891		335		12,776		405,450
State, county, and municipal obligations		108,298		1,125		427		108,996
Asset-backed securities		5,000		—		6		4,994
Equity securities		44,198		188		—		44,386
Total securities	$	917,710	$	1,669	$	20,268	$	899,111

Equity securities primarily include Bank-owned stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve Bank. The cost basis (par value) in FHLB stock was $42.3 million and $37.5 million at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and the cost basis of Federal Reserve Bank stock was $5.7 million and $5.6 million at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

For the Corporation’s securities designated as temporarily impaired at September 30, 2006, the following table reflects the fair values and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.

	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
(In thousands)	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
AAA/AA-RATED SECURITIES
U.S. government obligations	$	4,988	$	7	$	9,977	$	15	$	14,965	$	22
U.S. government agency obligations		15,990		12		235,948		4,060		251,938		4,072
Mortgage-backed securities		87,391		497		241,473		9,858		328,864		10,355
State, county, and muncipal obligations		2,485		8		17,182		425		19,667		433
Total AAA/AA-rated securities		110,854		524		504,580		14,358		615,434		14,882
A/BBB-RATED SECURITIES
Asset-backed securities		14,944		56		4,976		24		19,920		80
Total A/BBB-rated securities		14,944		56		4,976		24		19,920		80
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	125,798	$	580	$	509,556	$	14,382	$	635,354	$	14,962

The unrealized losses associated with these securities were not considered to be other-than-temporary, because they were related to changes in interest rates and did not affect the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral or the issuer. At September 30, 2006, the Corporation had the ability and the intent to hold these investments to recovery of fair market value.

12

7. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

During the third quarter of 2006, approximately $93.9 million of consumer loans secured by real estate were transferred from the consumer loan category to the home equity ($13.5 million) and mortgage ($80.4 million) loan categories to make the balance sheet presentation more consistent with bank regulatory definitions. The balance sheet transfer had no effect on credit reporting, underwriting, reported results of operations, or liquidity. Prior period-end balances have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation.

Portfolio loans are categorized as follows:

	September 30, 2006					December 31, 2005
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Commercial real estate	$	905,299		29.3	%	$	780,597		26.5	%
Commercial non real estate		225,874		7.3			233,409		7.9
Construction		608,899		19.7			517,392		17.6
Mortgage		623,271		20.2			660,720		22.4
Home equity		458,545		14.8			495,181		16.8
Consumer		269,932		8.7			258,619		8.8
Total portfolio loans	$	3,091,820		100.0	%	$	2,945,918		100.0	%

A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses follows:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30						September 30
(In thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Balance at beginning of period	$	29,520		$	29,032		$	28,725		$	26,872
Provision for loan losses		1,405			2,770			3,804			7,548
Charge-offs		(1,307	)		(2,197	)		(3,671	)		(5,631	)
Recoveries		301			183			1,061			999
Net charge-offs		(1,006	)		(2,014	)		(2,610	)		(4,632	)
Balance at end of period	$	29,919		$	29,788		$	29,919		$	29,788

13

Nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest follow:

	September 30		December 31
(In thousands)	2006		2005
Nonaccrual loans	$	7,090	$	10,811
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing		—		—
Total nonperforming loans		7,090		10,811
Other real estate		5,601		5,124
Total nonperforming assets	$	12,691	$	15,935

At September 30, 2006, the recorded investment in individually impaired loans was $0.3 million, all of which were on nonaccrual status. The related allowance for loan losses on these loans was $0.1 million. At December 31, 2005, the recorded investment in individually impaired loans was $8.2 million, of which $4.3 million were on nonaccrual status and had specific reserves of $0.6 million and $3.9 million were accruing and had specific reserves of $0.7 million.

The average recorded investment in individually impaired loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, was $0.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The average recorded investment in individually impaired loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, was $8.5 million and $10.3 million, respectively.

8. Stock-Based Compensation

First Charter Comprehensive Stock Option Plan.In April 1992, the Corporation’s shareholders approved the First Charter Corporation Comprehensive Stock Option Plan (Comprehensive Stock Option Plan). Under the terms of the Comprehensive Stock Option Plan, stock options (which can be incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options) may be periodically granted to key employees of the Corporation or its subsidiaries. The terms and vesting schedules of options granted under the Comprehensive Stock Option Plan generally are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors (Compensation Committee). However, no options may be exercisable prior to six months following the grant date, and certain additional restrictions, including the term and exercise price, apply with respect to any incentive stock options. Under the Comprehensive Stock Option Plan, 480,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, no shares were issued under this plan.

First Charter Corporation Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors.In April 1997, the Corporation’s shareholders approved the First Charter Corporation Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Director Plan). Under the Director Plan, non-statutory stock options may be granted to non-employee Directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The terms and vesting schedules of any options granted under the Director Plan generally are determined by the Compensation Committee. The exercise price for each option granted, however, is the fair value of the common stock as of the date of grant. A maximum of 180,000 shares are reserved for issuance under the Director Plan. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, no shares were issued under this plan.

2000 Omnibus Stock Option and Award Plan.In June 2000, the Corporation’s shareholders approved the First Charter Corporation 2000 Omnibus Stock Option and Award Plan (2000 Omnibus Plan). Under the 2000 Omnibus Plan, 2.0 million shares of common stock were originally reserved for issuance. In April of 2005, the shareholders approved an amendment to the 2000 Omnibus Plan, authorizing an additional 1.5 million shares for issuance, for a total of 3.5 million shares. The 2000 Omnibus Plan permits the granting of stock options and nonvested shares to Directors and key employees. Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date of grant; those stock option awards generally vest ratably over five years and have a 10-year contractual term. Nonvested shares are generally granted at a value equal to the market price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date of grant and vesting is based on either service or performance conditions. Service-based nonvested shares generally vest over three years. Performance-based nonvested shares

14

are earned over three years upon meeting various performance goals as approved by the Compensation Committee, including cash return on equity, targeted charge-off levels, and earnings per share growth as measured against a group of selected peer companies. During the three months ended September 30, 2006, no shares were issued under this plan. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, 69,250 stock options, 15,000 service-based nonvested shares and 58,500 performance-based nonvested shares were issued under this plan. The number of these performance-based shares, which will ultimately be issued, is dependent upon the Corporation’s performance as it relates to the performance of selected peer companies as discussed above.

Restricted Stock Award Program.In April 1995, the Corporation’s shareholders approved the First Charter Corporation Restricted Stock Award Program (Restricted Stock Plan). Awards of restricted stock (nonvested shares) may be made under the Restricted Stock Plan at the discretion of the Compensation Committee to key employees. Nonvested shares are granted at a value equal to the market price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date of grant and generally vest based on either three or five years of service. Under the Restricted Stock Plan, a maximum of 360,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, 3,000 and 84,915 service-based nonvested shares were issued under this plan, respectively.

Stock-based compensation costs totaled $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, which consisted of $0.2 million related to stock options, $0.2 million related to service-based nonvested shares, and $0.1 million related to performance-based nonvested shares. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, stock-based compensation costs totaled $1.5 million, which consisted of $0.6 million related to stock options, $0.6 million related to service-based nonvested shares, and $0.3 million related to performance-based nonvested shares.

The fair value of each stock option award is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30						September 30
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Expected volatility		—	%		25.7	%		24.8	%		26.5	%
Expected dividend yield		—			3.1			3.2			3.2
Risk-free interest rate		—			4.2			4.7			3.9
Expected term (in years)		—			7.1			8.0			6.9

The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value stock-based awards. The risk-free rate of interest for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on a U.S. government instrument over the contractual term of the equity instrument. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Corporation’s stock.

15

Pro forma net income as if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards follows:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30						September 30
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Net income, as reported	$	12,781		$	12,052		$	35,771		$	33,641
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income		336			31			1,143			87
Less: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(336	)		(500	)		(1,143	)		(1,597	)
Pro forma net income	$	12,781		$	11,583		$	35,771		$	32,131
Net income per share
Basic — as reported	$	0.41		$	0.39		$	1.16		$	1.11
Basic — pro forma		0.41			0.38			1.16			1.06
Diluted — as reported		0.41			0.39			1.14			1.10
Diluted — pro forma		0.41			0.37			1.14			1.05

Stock option activity under the Comprehensive Stock Option Plan, the Director Plan, and the 2000 Omnibus Plan at and for the period ended September 30, 2006 follow:

				Weighted-		Weighted-
				Average		Average
				Exercise		Remaining		Aggregate
				(Option)		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Term (Years)		Value
Outstanding at January 1		2,638,058		$	21.09
Granted		69,250			23.68
Exercised		(115,250	)		16.52			$	883,380
Forfeited		(23,567	)		21.56
Expired		(7,400	)		24.66
Outstanding at March 31		2,561,091			21.35
Granted		—			—
Exercised		(96,946	)		18.06				603,731
Forfeited		(23,941	)		21.97
Expired		(2,798	)		20.48
Outstanding at June 30		2,437,406			21.48
Granted		—			—
Exercised		(44,065	)		17.92				277,612
Forfeited		(40,705	)		21.40
Expired		(26,877	)		23.41
Outstanding at September 30		2,325,759		$	21.53		3.7	$	6,355,226
Options exercisable at September 30		1,781,798		$	21.32		2.5	$	5,324,996
Weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value of options granted during the year				$	5.85

The weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value of options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 was $5.78 and $5.53, respectively, and the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $0.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively.

16

Nonvested share activity under the Omnibus Plan and the Restricted Stock Plan at and for the period ended September 30, 2006 follow:

	Service-Based					Performance-Based
				Weighted				Weighted
				Average Grant				Average Grant
	Shares			Price		Shares		Price
Outstanding at January 1		32,647		$	22.97		—	$	—
Granted		89,549			23.68		58,500		23.66
Vested		—			—		—		—
Forfeited		(895	)		22.34		—		—
Outstanding at March 31		121,301			23.50		58,500		23.66
Granted		7,366			24.10		—		—
Vested		—			—		—		—
Forfeited		(1,571	)		23.66		—		—
Outstanding at June 30		127,096			23.53		58,500		23.66
Granted		3,000			23.59		—		—
Vested		—			—		—		—
Forfeited		(5,392	)		23.68		—		—
Outstanding at September 30		124,704		$	23.53		58,500	$	23.66

As of September 30, 2006, there were $2.1 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to service-based nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Omnibus Plan and the Restricted Stock Plan. These costs are expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

As of September 30, 2006, there were $1.0 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to performance-based nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Omnibus Plan. These costs are expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 2.3 years.

9. Commitments, Contingencies, and Off-Balance-Sheet Risk

Commitments and Off-Balance-Sheet Risk. The Corporation is party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and may require collateral from the borrower if deemed necessary by the Corporation. Included in loan commitments are commitments to cover customer deposit account overdrafts should they occur. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party up to a stipulated amount and with specified terms and conditions. Standby letters of credit are recorded as a liability by the Corporation at the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The fair value and carrying value at September 30, 2006, of standby letters of credit issued or modified during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was immaterial. Commitments to extend credit are not recorded as an asset or liability by the Corporation until the instrument is exercised. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for instruments reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The creditworthiness of each customer is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

17

The Corporation’s exposure to credit risk follows:

	September 30		December 31
(In thousands)	2006		2005
Loan commitments	$	806,680	$	711,556
Lines of credit		479,954		441,855
Standby letters of credit		20,881		15,600
Total commitments	$	1,307,515	$	1,169,011

Contingencies. The Corporation and the Bank are defendants in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operations, liquidity, or financial position of the Corporation or the Bank.

The Corporation is currently under examination by the North Carolina Department of Revenue (DOR) for 1999 through 2001 and is subject to examination for subsequent tax years. As a result of the examination, the DOR issued a proposed tax assessment, including an estimate for accrued interest, of $3.7 million for tax years 1999 and 2000. The Corporation is currently appealing the proposed assessment.

The DOR announced a Settlement Initiative (Initiative) allowing companies that have entered into certain eligible transactions to participate in the Initiative by June 15, 2006. The Initiative provides the Corporation an opportunity to resolve matters with a significant reduction in potential penalties. Resolution under the Initiative would be expected to include all open tax years. While management believes the Corporation is in compliance with existing state tax statutes, it intends to continue discussions with the DOR and is currently participating in the Initiative. The Corporation may withdraw from participation in the Initiative at any time prior to March 15, 2007.

The examination and the Corporation’s participation in the Initiative are also expected to impact tax years after 2000. The Corporation estimates that the maximum tax liability that may be asserted by the DOR for tax years 1999 through the current tax year is approximately $9.0 million, in excess of amounts reserved, net of federal benefit. The Corporation would disagree with such potential liability if assessed, and would intend to continue to defend its position. The Corporation believes its current tax reserves are adequate.

There can be no assurance regarding the ultimate outcome of this matter, the timing of its resolution or the eventual loss or penalties that may result from it, which may be more or less than the amounts reserved by the Corporation.

10. Subsequent Event

As previously announced, on June 1, 2006 the Corporation entered into and announced a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) to acquire all outstanding shares of GBC Bancorp, Inc. (GBC), parent of Gwinnett Banking Company, headquartered in Lawrenceville, Georgia (Merger). The Merger closed effective November 1, 2006. At that date, GBC operated two retail bank branch offices in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area.

As a result of the Merger, each outstanding share of GBC common stock was converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of the GBC share, either $47.74 in cash, 1.989 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, or a combination of cash and common stock. All elections by GBC shareholders are subject to the allocation and proration procedures described in the Merger Agreement. These procedures are intended to ensure that 70% of the outstanding shares of GBC common stock are converted into the right to receive the Corporation’s common stock and that the remaining GBC shares are converted into the right to receive cash. The aggregate consideration payable in the Merger consists of approximately $30.6 million in cash and approximately 2,975,000 shares of the Corporation’s common

18

stock, representing a total approximate transaction cost of $103 million. The assets and liabilities of GBC will be recorded on the Corporation’s balance sheet at their estimated fair values as of November 1, 2006, and their results of operations will be included in the consolidated statements of income from that date forward.

As of September 30, 2006, GBC had total assets, deposits, and shareholders’ equity of $398.0 million, $345.0 million, and $43.5 million, respectively. Included in total assets were $32.8 million of securities and $340.5 million of loans, net. For the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, GBC’s total revenue was $5.8 million and $4.7 million, respectively, and net income was $2.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, GBC’s total revenue was $16.6 million and $14.0 million, respectively, and net income was $5.8 million and $4.5 million, respectively. GBC’s past financial performance should not be construed to be indicative of its future contribution to the financial results of First Charter.

19

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Factors that May Affect Future Results

The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements about the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations, which are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s judgment only as of the date hereof. The Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.

Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward- looking statements, and which may be beyond the Corporation’s control, include, among others, the following possibilities: (1) projected results in connection with management’s implementation of, or changes in, the Corporation’s business plan and strategic initiatives, including balance sheet initiatives, are lower than expected; (2) competitive pressure among financial services companies increases significantly; (3) costs or difficulties related to the integration of acquisitions, including deposit attrition, customer retention and revenue loss, or expenses in general are greater than expected; (4) general economic conditions, in the markets in which the Corporation does business, are less favorable than expected; (5) risks inherent in making loans, including repayment risks and risks associated with collateral values, are greater than expected; (6) changes in the interest rate environment, or interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, may reduce interest margins and affect funding sources; (7) changes in market rates and prices may adversely affect the value of financial products; (8) legislation or regulatory requirements or changes thereto, including changes in accounting standards, may adversely affect the businesses in which the Corporation is engaged; (9) regulatory compliance cost increases are greater than expected; (10) the passage of future tax legislation, or any negative regulatory, administrative or judicial position, may adversely impact the Corporation; (11) the Corporation’s competitors may have greater financial resources and may develop products that enable them to compete more successfully in the markets in which it operates; and (12) changes in the securities markets, including changes in interest rates, may adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to raise capital from time to time.

Overview

First Charter Corporation (First Charter or the Corporation), headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, is a regional financial services company with assets of $4.4 billion and is the holding company for First Charter Bank. As of September 30, 2006, First Charter operated 56 financial centers, four insurance offices, and 136 ATMs throughout North Carolina. First Charter also operates loan origination offices in Asheville, North Carolina and Reston, Virginia. First Charter provides businesses and individuals with a broad range of financial services, including banking, financial planning, wealth management, investments, insurance, mortgages, and a full array of employee benefit programs. The results of operations of the Bank constitute the substantial majority of the consolidated net income, revenue, and assets of the Corporation.

As previously announced, on June 1, 2006 the Corporation entered into and announced a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) to acquire all outstanding shares of GBC Bancorp, Inc. (GBC), parent of Gwinnett Banking Company, headquartered in Lawrenceville, Georgia (Merger). The Merger closed effective November 1, 2006. At that date, GBC operated two retail bank branch offices in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area.

As a result of the Merger, each outstanding share of GBC common stock was converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of the GBC share, either $47.74 in cash, 1.989 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, or a combination of cash and common stock. All elections by GBC shareholders are subject to the allocation and proration procedures described in the Merger Agreement.

20

These procedures are intended to ensure that 70% of the outstanding shares of GBC common stock are converted into the right to receive the Corporation’s common stock and that the remaining GBC shares are converted into the right to receive cash. The aggregate consideration payable in the Merger consists of approximately $30.6 million in cash and approximately 2,975,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, representing a total approximate transaction cost of $103 million. The assets and liabilities of GBC will be recorded on the Corporation’s balance sheet at their estimated fair values as of November 1, 2006, and its results of operations will be included in the consolidated statements of income from that date forward.

As of September 30, 2006, GBC had total assets, deposits, and shareholders’ equity of $398.0 million, $345.0 million, and $43.5 million, respectively. Included in total assets were $32.8 million of securities and $340.5 million of loans, net. For the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, GBC’s total revenue was $5.8 million and $4.7 million, respectively, and net income was $2.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, GBC’s total revenue was $16.6 million and $14.0 million, respectively, and net income was $5.8 million and $4.5 million, respectively. GBC’s past financial performance should not be construed to be indicative of its future contribution to the financial results of First Charter.

In late September, First Charter’s previously announced sale of two financial centers was completed. The sale reduced period-end loans and deposits by $8.1 million and $38.0 million, respectively.

The Corporation’s principal source of earnings is derived from net interest income. Net interest income is the interest earned on securities, loans, and other interest-earning assets less the interest paid for deposits and short- and long-term debt.

Another source of earnings for the Corporation is noninterest income. Noninterest income is derived largely from service charges on deposit accounts and other fee or commission-based services and products including mortgage, financial management, brokerage, and insurance. Other sources of noninterest income include securities gains or losses, transactions involving bank-owned property, and income from Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) policies.

Noninterest expense is the primary component of expense for the Corporation. Noninterest expense is primarily composed of corporate operating expenses, including salaries and benefits, occupancy and equipment, professional fees, and other operating expenses.

Financial Summary

The Corporation’s third quarter 2006 net income was $12.8 million, an increase of 6.0 percent from $12.1 million a year ago. Earnings per share were $0.41 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2006, an increase of two cents per diluted share from $0.39 for the third quarter a year ago. Total revenue increased 5.6 percent to $50.8 million, compared to $48.1 million in the third quarter a year ago. The increase was driven by a $1.9 million increase in net interest income and a 41 basis point improvement in the net interest margin to 3.33 percent. The net interest income and margin improvement was largely attributable to First Charter’s balance sheet repositioning initiatives undertaken in the fourth quarter of 2005. Noninterest income increased to $17.9 million from $17.0 million a year ago. Contributing to the growth over the third quarter of 2005 were increases in wealth management, insurance, and ATM and debit card revenue. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2006, the Corporation recognized $3.4 million of gains on equity method investments, a $2.8 million gain on the sale of loans and deposits, and $5.9 million of securities losses, versus nominal gains/losses on similar activity in the third quarter of 2005. Noninterest expense for the 2006 third quarter was $30.4 million, a $1.4 million increase compared to the third quarter of 2005, principally due to costs associated with the Corporation’s Raleigh investment. Loan growth was strong as average balances increased $174.1 million, or 6.0 percent, compared to the third quarter a year ago. Average deposits increased $157.9 million, or 5.6 percent, compared to the third quarter a year ago. Credit quality continues to be solid with net charge-offs of 0.13 percent of average portfolio loans in the third quarter of 2006, compared to 0.28 percent in the year-ago quarter.

21

At September 30, 2006, Raleigh-related loans and deposits totaled $108.1 million and $36.9 million, respectively.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net income was $35.8 million, an increase of 6.3 percent, from $33.6 million in the year-ago period. Earnings were $1.14 per diluted share, an increase of four cents per diluted share from $1.10 a year ago. Total revenue increased 5.5 percent to $151.1 million, compared to $143.1 million a year ago. The increase in revenue was driven by two factors. First, net interest income on increased $4.7 million to $97.7 million as the net interest margin expanded 37 basis points to 3.36 percent. The improvement in net interest income and the margin was largely attributable to First Charter’s balance sheet repositioning initiatives undertaken in the fourth quarter of 2005. Second, noninterest income increased $3.2 million, or 6.4 percent, due to higher insurance, mortgage, deposit service charges, and ATM and debit card revenue. Noninterest expense increased $6.1 million to $93.3 million, largely due to costs associated with the Corporation’s Raleigh investment and expenses associated with SFAS 123(R). Loan growth was strong as average balances increased $269.4 million, or 9.8 percent, compared to a year ago. Average deposits for the nine-month period of 2006 increased $141.5 million, or 5.2 percent, compared to a year ago.

The Community Banking Model

First Charter follows a community-banking model. The community-banking model is focused on delivering our clients with a broad array of financial products and solutions, delivered with exceptional service and convenience at a fair price. It emphasizes local market decision-making and management whenever possible. Management believes this model works well against larger competitors that may have less flexibility, as well as local competition that may not have the array of products and services that First Charter can offer. First Charter competes against four of the largest banks in the country as well as other local banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, and finance companies. Management believes that by focusing on core values, striving to exceed our clients’ expectations, being an employer of choice and providing exceptional value to shareholders, First Charter can achieve the profitability and growth goals it has set for itself.

Please refer to First Charter’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, for additional information with respect to the Corporation’s recent accomplishments and significant challenges.

22

Table One

Selected Quarterly Financial Data

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except	September 30			June 30			March 31			December 31			September 30
per share amounts)	2006			2006			2006			2005			2005
Income statement
Tax-equivalent interest income	$	67,634		$	64,318		$	60,232		$	59,231		$	59,654
Total interest expense		34,127			31,095			27,556			26,710			27,990
Tax-equivalent net interest income		33,507			33,223			32,676			32,521			31,664
Provision for loan losses		1,405			880			1,519			1,795			2,770
Total noninterest income		17,884			17,240			18,241			39			17,043
Total noninterest expense		30,368			31,436			31,512			44,046			28,943
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) and tax-equivalent adjustment		19,618			18,147			17,886			(13,281	)		16,994
Tax-equivalent adjustment		549			576			586			592			574
Income tax expense (benefit)		6,288			6,025			5,856			(5,543	)		4,368
Net income (loss)	$	12,781		$	11,546		$	11,444		$	(8,330	)	$	12,052
Per common share
Net income
Basic	$	0.41		$	0.37		$	0.37		$	(0.27	)	$	0.39
Diluted		0.41			0.37			0.37			(0.27	)		0.39
Cash dividends declared		0.195			0.195			0.19			0.19			0.19
Period-end book value		11.30			10.83			10.77			10.53			10.82
Average shares
Basic		31,056,059			31,058,858			30,859,461			30,678,743			30,575,440
Diluted		31,426,563			31,339,325			31,153,338			30,678,743			30,891,887
Ratios
Return on average equity(1)		14.74	%		13.78	%		14.12	%		(10.21	)%		14.57	%
Return on average assets(1)		1.17			1.08			1.10			(0.77	)		1.02
Net yield on earning assets(1)		3.33			3.36			3.40			3.27			2.92
Average portfolio loans to average deposits		103.37			108.27			105.51			103.01			103.01
Average equity to average assets		7.93			7.86			7.82			7.52			7.03
Efficiency ratio(2)		53.0			62.3			61.9			59.7			59.4
Selected period-end balances
Portfolio loans, net	$	3,061,864		$	3,042,768		$	2,981,458		$	2,917,020		$	2,900,357
Loans held for sale		10,923			8,382			8,719			6,447			7,309
Allowance for loan losses		29,919			29,520			29,505			28,725			29,788
Securities available for sale		899,120			884,370			900,424			899,111			1,374,163
Assets		4,384,668			4,363,274			4,283,356			4,232,420			4,699,722
Deposits		2,954,854			2,988,802			2,800,346			2,799,479			2,872,993
Other borrowings		1,031,798			995,707			1,103,784			1,068,573			1,438,388
Total liabilities		4,032,094			4,026,339			3,949,729			3,908,824			4,368,677
Shareholders’ equity		352,574			336,935			333,627			323,596			331,045
Selected average balances
Portfolio loans, net		3,070,286			3,021,005			2,939,233			2,924,064			2,896,794
Loans held for sale		8,792			9,810			6,675			8,131			8,160
Securities available for sale		923,293			921,026			914,760			1,028,477			1,420,033
Earning assets		4,013,745			3,960,835			3,868,519			3,969,620			4,331,780
Assets		4,338,371			4,276,335			4,203,273			4,303,821			4,665,301
Deposits		2,970,047			2,790,197			2,785,632			2,838,566			2,812,165
Other borrowings		984,504			1,108,734			1,049,529			1,099,350			1,471,482
Shareholders’ equity		344,073			335,979			328,763			323,753			328,115

(1)	Annualized
(2)	Noninterest expense less debt extinguishment expense and derivative termination costs divided by the sum of taxable-equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less (loss) gain on sale of securities

23

Table Two

Selected Financial Data

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2006			2005
Income statement
Tax-equivalent interest income	$	192,184		$	167,710
Interest expense		92,778			73,012
Tax-equivalent net interest income		99,406			94,698
Provision for loan losses		3,804			7,548
Noninterest income		53,365			50,174
Noninterest expense		93,316			87,176
Income before income tax expense and tax-equivalent adjustment		55,651			50,148
Tax-equivalent adjustment		1,711			1,744
Income tax expense		18,169			14,763
Net income	$	35,771		$	33,641
Per common share
Net income
Basic	$	1.16		$	1.11
Diluted		1.14			1.10
Cash dividends declared		0.58			0.57
Period-end book value		11.30			10.82
Average shares
Basic		30,937,922			30,383,039
Diluted		31,310,939			30,704,138
Ratios
Return on average equity(1)		14.22	%		13.98	%
Return on average assets(1)		1.12			0.99
Net yield on earning assets(1)		3.36			2.99
Average portfolio loans to average deposits		105.66			101.31
Average equity to average assets		7.87			7.07
Efficiency ratio(2)		58.8			60.2
Selected period-end balances
Portfolio loans, net	$	3,061,864		$	2,900,357
Loans held for sale		10,923			7,309
Allowance for loan losses		29,919			29,788
Securities available for sale		899,120			1,374,163
Assets		4,384,668			4,699,722
Deposits		2,954,854			2,872,993
Other borrowings		1,031,798			1,438,388
Total liabilities		4,032,094			4,368,677
Shareholders’ equity		352,574			331,045
Selected average balances
Portfolio loans, net		3,010,654			2,743,156
Loans held for sale		8,434			6,560
Securities available for sale		919,724			1,473,737
Earning assets		3,948,256			4,230,801
Assets		4,273,277			4,551,516
Deposits		2,849,301			2,707,776
Other borrowings		1,047,351			1,469,110
Shareholders’ equity		336,328			321,711

(1)	Annualized
(2)	Noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable-equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less securities gains (losses), net

24

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies

The Corporation’s significant accounting policies are described in Note One of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, on pages 59 to 67, as supplemented in this report with respect to the Corporation’s stock-based compensation policy adopted effective January 1, 2006. These policies are essential in understanding management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. Some of the Corporation’s accounting policies require significant judgment to estimate values of either assets or liabilities. In addition, certain accounting principles require significant judgment with respect to their application to complicated transactions to determine the most appropriate treatment.

The Corporation has identified three accounting policies as being critical in terms of judgments and the extent to which estimates are used: allowance for loan losses, income taxes, and derivative instruments. In many cases, there are numerous alternative judgments that could be used in the process of estimating values of assets or liabilities. Where alternatives exist, the Corporation has used the factors it believes represent the most reasonable value in developing the inputs for the valuation. Actual performance that differs from the Corporation’s estimates of the key variables could affect net income. For more information on the Corporation’s critical accounting policies, refer to pages 26 to 29 of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Earnings Performance

Net Interest Income and Margin

Net interest income, the difference between total interest income and total interest expense, is the Corporation’s principal source of earnings. An analysis of the Corporation’s net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and average balance sheets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 is presented inTables Three and Four, respectively. Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis is a non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) performance measure used by management in operating the business, which management believes provides investors with a more accurate picture of the interest margin for comparative purposes. The changes in net interest income (on a taxable-equivalent basis) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are analyzed inTables Five and Six. The discussion below is based on net interest income computed under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

For the three months ended September 30, 2006, net interest income $33.0 million, an increase of $1.9 million, or 6.0 percent from $31.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The increase was primarily due to a $174.1 million increase in average loan balances, an increase in the percentage of earning assets funded by low-cost core deposits (money market, demand, and savings accounts), and the balance sheet repositioning, which occurred in late 2005.

The net interest margin (taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets) expanded 41 basis points to 3.33 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to 2.92 percent in the same 2005 period. The margin improvement was primarily the result of the previously disclosed October 2005 balance sheet repositioning.

Compared to the third quarter of 2005, earning-asset yields increased 122 basis points to 6.70 percent. This increase was driven by two factors. First, loan yields increased 107 basis points to 7.35 percent and securities yields increased 72 basis points to 4.56 percent. Second, although the absolute level of earning assets declined, the mix of higher-yielding (loan) assets improved as a result of the balance sheet repositioning and subsequent management emphasis. The percentage of investment security average balances (which, on average, have lower yields than loans) to total earning-asset average balances was reduced from 33 percent to 23 percent over the past year. Earning-asset average balances decreased $318.0 million to $4.0 billion at September 30, 2006, compared to $4.3 billion for the same 2005 period. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $496.7 million decline in average

25

securities balances resulting largely from the balance sheet repositioning, partially offset by $174.1 million of growth in the Corporation’s loan average balances.

The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 98 basis points, compared to the third quarter of 2005. This increase was comprised of a 107 basis point increase in interest-bearing deposit costs to 3.47 percent, while other borrowing costs increased 119 basis points to 4.83 percent. During this period, the Federal Reserve raised the rate that banks can lend funds to each other (the Fed Funds rate) by 200 basis points. Interest-bearing liability average balances decreased $353.4 million, compared to September 30, 2005. The decrease was primarily due to the balance sheet repositioning, which resulted in a $487.0 million decline in other borrowings average balances. This decline in interest-bearing liabilities average balances was partially offset by a $133.6 million increase in interest-bearing deposit average balances, compared to the third quarter of 2005, driven by a $104.6 million increase in money market average balances. As a result of the balance sheet repositioning and subsequent management emphasis, the percentage of higher-cost, other borrowings average balances was reduced from 38 percent to 28 percent of total interest-bearing liabilities average balances over the past year.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net interest income totaled $97.7 million, an increase of $4.7 million, or 5.1 percent from $93.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase was mainly due to a $269.4 million increase in average loan balances, an increase in the percentage of earning assets funded by low-cost core deposits (money market, demand and savings accounts), and the balance sheet repositioning.

The net interest margin increased 37 basis points to 3.36 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to 2.99 percent in the same 2005 period. The margin improvement was primarily the result of the previously October 2005 balance sheet repositioning.

Compared to the 2005 nine-month period, the 121 basis point increase in earning-asset yields was driven by two factors. First, loan yields increased 110 basis points to 7.15 percent and securities yields increased 51 basis points to 4.41 percent. Second, the percentage of higher-yielding assets improved as a result of the balance sheet repositioning. The percentage of investment security average balances (which have lower yields than loans, on average) to total earning asset average balances was reduced from 35 percent to 23 percent over the past year. Earning-asset average balances decreased $282.5 million to $3.9 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $4.2 billion for the same 2005 period. The decrease was primarily due to the balance sheet repositioning, which resulted in a $554.0 million decline in average securities balances, partially offset by $269.4 million growth in the Corporation’s loan average balances, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 100 basis points, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This was comprised of a 100 basis point increase in interest-bearing deposit costs to 3.15 percent, while other borrowing costs increased 130 basis points to 4.56 percent. Interest-bearing liability average balances decreased $318.3 million, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease was primarily due to the balance sheet repositioning and subsequent management emphasis, which resulted in a $421.8 million decline in other borrowings average balances. This decline in interest-bearing liabilities average balances was partially offset by a $103.5 million increase in interest-bearing deposit average balances, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, driven by a $110.4 million increase in money market average balances.

26

Interest income and yields for earning-asset average balances and interest expense and rates paid on interest-bearing liability average balances, and the net interest margin follow:

Table Three

Average Balance and Net Interest Income Analysis

	Three Months Ended September 30
	2006							2005
	Daily		Interest		Average			Daily		Interest		Average
	Average		Income/		Yield/Rate			Average		Income/		Yield/Rate
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Expense		Paid(5)			Balance		Expense		Paid(5)
Earning assets:
Loans and loans held for sale(1) (2) (3)	$	3,079,078	$	56,958		7.35	%	$	2,904,954	$	45,941		6.28	%
Securities — taxable		826,435		9,079		4.39			1,311,296		12,160		3.71
Securities — nontaxable		96,858		1,449		5.98			108,737		1,500		5.52
Federal funds sold		6,711		87		5.14			1,746		15		3.49
Interest-bearing bank deposits		4,663		61		5.19			5,047		38		2.98
Total earning assets(4)		4,013,745	$	67,634		6.70	%		4,331,780	$	59,654		5.48	%
Cash and due from banks		75,391							106,838
Other assets		249,235							226,683
Total assets	$	4,338,371						$	4,665,301
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	972,648	$	5,925		2.42	%	$	841,800	$	2,908		1.37	%
Savings deposits		116,866		63		0.21			122,884		69		0.22
Other time deposits		1,439,204		16,143		4.45			1,430,468		11,510		3.19
Other borrowings		984,504		11,996		4.83			1,471,482		13,503		3.64
Total interest-bearing liabilities		3,513,222	$	34,127		3.85	%		3,866,634	$	27,990		2.87	%
Noninterest bearing deposits		441,329							417,013
Other liabilities		39,747							53,539
Shareholders’ equity		344,073							328,115
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	4,338,371						$	4,665,301
Net interest spread						2.85	%						2.61	%
Contribution of noninterest bearing sources						0.48							0.31
Net interest income/yield on earning assets			$	33,507		3.33	%			$	31,664		2.92	%

(1)	The preceding analysis takes into consideration the principal amount of nonaccruing loans and only income actually collected and recognized on such loans.
(2)	Average loan balances are shown net of unearned income.
(3)	Includes loan fees and amortization of deferred loan fees of $654 and $610 for the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(4)	Yields on nontaxable securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis, assuming a Federal tax rate of 35 percent and applicable state taxes for the third quarter of 2006 and 2005. The adjustments made to convert to a taxable-equivalent basis were $549 and $574 for the third quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(5)	Annualized

27

Interest income and yields for earning-asset average balances and interest expense and rates paid on interest-bearing liability average balances, and the net interest margin follow:

Table Four
Average Balances and Net Interest Income Analysis

	Nine Months Ended September 30
	2006							2005
	Daily		Interest		Average			Daily		Interest		Average
	Average		Income/		Yield/Rate			Average		Income/		Yield/Rate
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Expense		Paid(5)			Balance		Expense		Paid(5)
Earning assets:
Loans and loans held for sale(1) (2) (3)	$	3,019,088	$	161,431		7.15	%	$	2,749,716	$	124,457		6.05	%
Securities — taxable		818,306		25,920		4.22			1,363,140		38,566		3.77
Securities — nontaxable		101,418		4,513		5.93			110,597		4,544		5.48
Federal funds sold		4,328		160		4.95			1,639		36		2.96
Interest-bearing bank deposits		5,116		160		4.19			5,709		107		2.51
Total earning assets(4)		3,948,256	$	192,184		6.50	%		4,230,801	$	167,710		5.29	%
Cash and due from banks		83,359							93,966
Other assets		241,662							226,749
Total assets	$	4,273,277						$	4,551,516
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	944,343	$	15,326		2.17	%	$	810,926	$	6,266		1.03	%
Savings deposits		119,352		192		0.22			123,717		209		0.23
Other time deposits		1,358,177		41,518		4.09			1,383,723		30,736		2.97
Other borrowings		1,047,351		35,742		4.56			1,469,110		35,801		3.26
Total interest-bearing liabilities		3,469,223	$	92,778		3.58	%		3,787,476	$	73,012		2.58	%
Noninterest bearing deposits		427,429							389,410
Other liabilities		40,297							52,919
Shareholders’ equity		336,328							321,711
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	4,273,277						$	4,551,516
Net interest spread						2.92	%						2.71	%
Contribution of noninterest bearing sources						0.44							0.28
Net interest income/yield on earning assets			$	99,406		3.36	%			$	94,698		2.99	%

(1)	The preceding analysis takes into consideration the principal amount of nonaccruing loans and only income actually collected and recognized on such loans.
(2)	Average loan balances are shown net of unearned income.
(3)	Includes amortization of deferred loan fees of $2,100 and $1,606 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(4)	Yields on nontaxable securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis, assuming a Federal tax rate of 35 percent and applicable state taxes for the first nine months of 2006 and 2005. The adjustments made to convert to a taxable-equivalent basis were $1,711 and $1,744 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(5)	Annualized

28

The following table shows changes in tax-equivalent interest income, interest expense, and tax-equivalent net interest income arising from rate and volume changes for major categories of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The change in interest not solely due to changes in volume or rate has been allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.

Table Five
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis

	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2006 vs September 30, 2005
	Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in
	2006								2005
	Income/								Income/
(In thousands)	Expense		Rate			Volume			Expense
Interest income:
Loans and loans held for sale(1)	$	56,958	$	8,141		$	2,876		$	45,941
Securities — taxable		9,079		1,969			(5,050	)		12,160
Securities — nontaxable(1)		1,449		121			(172	)		1,500
Federal funds sold		87		11			61			15
Interest-bearing bank deposits		61		26			(3	)		38
Total interest income	$	67,634	$	10,268		$	(2,288	)	$	59,654
Interest expense:
Demand deposits	$	5,925	$	2,507		$	510		$	2,908
Savings deposits		63		(3	)		(3	)		69
Other time deposits		16,143		4,562			71			11,510
Other borrowings		11,996		3,698			(5,205	)		13,503
Total interest expense		34,127		10,764			(4,627	)		27,990
Net interest income	$	33,507	$	(496	)	$	2,339		$	31,664

⁽¹⁾ Income on nontaxable securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis. Refer toTable Threefor further details.

29

The following table shows changes in tax-equivalent interest income, interest expense, and tax-equivalent net interest income arising from rate and volume changes for major categories of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The change in interest not solely due to changes in volume or rate has been allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.

Table Six
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2006 vs September 30, 2005
	Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in
	2006								2005
	Income/								Income/
(In thousands)	Expense		Rate			Volume			Expense
Interest income:
Loans and loans held for sale(1)	$	161,431	$	24,006		$	12,968		$	124,457
Securities — taxable		25,920		4,187			(16,833	)		38,566
Securities — nontaxable(1)		4,513		362			(393	)		4,544
Federal funds sold		160		36			88			36
Interest-bearing bank deposits		160		65			(12	)		107
Total interest income	$	192,184	$	28,656		$	(4,182	)	$	167,710
Interest expense:
Demand deposits	$	15,326	$	7,882		$	1,178		$	6,266
Savings deposits		192		(10	)		(7	)		209
Other time deposits		41,518		11,359			(577	)		30,736
Other borrowings		35,742		11,937			(11,996	)		35,801
Total interest expense		92,778		31,168			(11,402	)		73,012
Net interest income	$	99,406	$	(2,512	)	$	7,220		$	94,698

⁽¹⁾ Income on nontaxable securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis. Refer toTable Fourfor further details.

Noninterest Income

The major components of noninterest income are derived from service charges on deposit accounts, ATM, debit, and merchant fees, and mortgage, brokerage, insurance, and wealth management revenue. In addition, the Corporation realizes gains (and losses) on securities, equity investments, and bank-owned property sales, and income from its BOLI policies.

Noninterest income was $17.9 million for the third quarter of 2006, and increase of $0.8 million, or 4.9 percent, compared to the third quarter of 2005. Contributing to the growth over the third quarter of 2005 were increases in wealth management, insurance, and ATM and debit card revenue.

Several unique transactions affected the year-over-year comparisons. First Charter recognized $3.4 million in SBIC/Venture Capital gains during the 2006 third quarter, versus nominal gains in the 2005 third quarter. The previously mentioned sale of two financial centers generated $3.1 million in gains, consisting of $2.8 million attributable to the sale of loans and deposits and $0.3 million from property sales. Total property sale gains were $0.4 million in the 2006 third quarter, compared to $0.6 million in the 2005 third quarter.

Management executed several initiatives during the second half of the 2006 third quarter designed to improve future net interest income and the net interest margin, reduce earnings volatility, and moderate interest rate risk. Specifically, the Company recognized losses of $5.9 million on the sale of lower-yielding securities. The proceeds from the sale of these securities provided the liquidity to reinvest in higher-yielding securities. There were nominal gains in the 2005 third quarter. Additionally, the

30

Corporation also restructured $21.5 million of BOLI during the third quarter, incurring a $0.3 million charge as a result.

Excluding all these transactions, noninterest income was $17.4 million for the third quarter of 2006, an increase of $1.0 million, or 5.7 percent, compared to the third quarter of 2005.

ATM and merchant income increased $0.5 million due to increased transaction volume resulting from an increase in the number of demand, interest-bearing, money market deposits. Insurance services and wealth management income increased $0.1 million each during the past year.

Noninterest income was $53.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $3.2 million compared to the same period in 2005. The previously described unique items similarly affected noninterest income for the nine-month periods. For the first nine months of 2006, securities losses were $5.8 million, versus nominal losses in 2005. Gains of $4.0 million were recognized on the Corporation’s SBIC/Venture Capital portfolio in 2006, compared to losses of $0.2 million in the same nine-month period of 2005. Gains on sales of deposits and loans were $2.8 million in the 2006 period. There were no deposit or loan sales in the comparable 2005 period. Gains on the sales of bank property were $0.6 million in 2006 and $1.3 million in 2005. BOLI income was reduced in 2006 by the previously mentioned $0.3 million restructuring charge, whereas $0.9 million of income was recognized on BOLI claims in the same 2005 period. Excluding all these transactions, noninterest income was $52.1 million for the first nine months of 2006, a $3.9 million, or 8.1 percent increase from $48.2 million in the 2005 period.

The improvement in noninterest income was across almost all fee income businesses and included a $1.3 million increase in ATM, debit card, and merchant income as a result of increased transaction volume, a $0.9 million increase in service charges resulting from increased NSF volume, a $0.7 million increase in insurance revenue, a $0.5 million increase in mortgage loan fees, and a $0.2 million increase in wealth management revenue. Brokerage revenue declined by $0.2 million and BOLI income decreased $1.1 million as a result of two death benefit claims in 2005 and the previously mentioned restructuring charge incurred in 2006.

Details of noninterest income follow:

Table Seven
Noninterest Income

	Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
	September 30					Increase/(Decrease)						September 30						Increase/(Decrease)
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005		Amount			Percent			2006			2005			Amount			Percent
Service charges on deposits	$	7,353		$	7,321	$	32			0.4	%	$	21,520		$	20,618		$	902			4.4	%
Wealth management		1,492			1,358		134			9.9			4,691			4,534			157			3.5
Securities gains (losses), net		(5,860	)		12		(5,872	)	NM				(5,828	)		(19	)		(5,809	)	NM
Gain on sale of deposits and loans		2,825			—		2,825		NM				2,825			—			2,825		NM
Equity method investments gains (losses), net		3,415			29		3,386		NM				3,971			(203	)		4,174		NM
Mortgage services		902			873		29			3.3			2,626			2,084			542			26.0
Brokerage services		847			888		(41	)		(4.6	)		2,250			2,483			(233	)		(9.4	)
Insurance services		2,937			2,796		141			5.0			10,084			9,407			677			7.2
Bank owned life insurance		722			863		(141	)		(16.3	)		2,399			3,452			(1,053	)		(30.5	)
Property sale gains, net		408			566		(158	)		(27.9	)		596			1,283			(687	)		(53.5	)
ATM, debit, and merchant fees		2,182			1,723		459			26.6			6,197			4,892			1,305			26.7
Other		661			614		47			7.7			2,034			1,643			391			23.8
Total noninterest income	$	17,884		$	17,043	$	841			4.9	%	$	53,365		$	50,174		$	3,191			6.4	%

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense for the 2006 third quarter was $30.4 million, a $1.4 million increase compared to the third quarter of 2005. Of this increase, $1.2 million was attributable to expense related to the Corporation’s Raleigh investment.

Salaries and employee benefits increased $0.6 million, compared to the third quarter of 2005, principally attributable to the Raleigh investment and FAS 123R expense, but partially offset by reductions in performance-based incentive accruals and the effect of a favorable adjustment to a medical reserve. Occupancy and equipment expense included $0.3 million of incremental Raleigh-related costs. Data

31

processing expense increased $0.2 million on a year-over-year basis due to increased transaction volume. Checking account promotions, along with the Raleigh market entry, contributed to the $0.2 million increase in marketing expense between periods. An increased level of outsourced technology, recruiting, audit, and property management services contributed to the $0.4 million rise in professional services expense.

For the first nine months of 2006, noninterest expense was $93.3 million, up $6.1 million from $87.2 million for the first nine months of 2005. Of this increase, $3.7 million is attributable to expenses related to the Corporation’s investments in Raleigh.

Salaries and employee benefits increased $3.7 million, compared to the 2005 nine-month period, of which $2.1 million is due to additional personnel in the Raleigh market. Incremental expense associated with equity-based compensation (FAS 123R) totaled $1.4 million, while increased incentive-based compensation contributed $1.0 million toward the increase in salary and employee benefits. These increases were partially offset by a $1.1 million expense associated with a legacy employee benefit plan in the second quarter of 2005, which did not recur in 2006.

Professional services expense rose $0.8 million, reflecting an increase in outsourced services, data processing increased $0.5 million as a result of increased ATM and debit transaction costs, occupancy and equipment expense increased $0.5 million due to additional financial center lease and depreciation costs, of which $0.8 million was related to the additional Raleigh financial centers. These increases were partially offset by certain corporate fixed assets becoming fully depreciated in the quarter and no longer being expensed.

Details of noninterest expense follow:

Table Eight
Noninterest Expense

	Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
	September 30				Increase/(Decrease)						September 30				Increase/(Decrease)
(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		Amount			Percent			2006		2005		Amount			Percent
Salaries and employee benefits	$	16,532	$	15,901	$	631			4.0	%	$	51,049	$	47,378	$	3,671			7.7	%
Occupancy and equipment		4,272		4,344		(72	)		(1.7	)		13,929		13,412		517			3.9
Data processing		1,510		1,310		200			15.3			4,454		3,964		490			12.4
Marketing		1,255		1,076		179			16.6			3,739		3,221		518			16.1
Postage and supplies		1,223		1,092		131			12.0			3,782		3,487		295			8.5
Professional services		2,476		2,064		412			20.0			6,731		5,961		770			12.9
Amortization of intangibles		160		128		32			25.0			464		385		79			20.5
Foreclosed properties		21		116		(95	)		(81.9	)		493		331		162			48.9
Telephone		570		537		33			6.1			1,677		1,616		61			3.8
Other		2,349		2,375		(26	)		(1.1	)		6,998		7,421		(423	)		(5.7	)
Total noninterest expense	$	30,368	$	28,943	$	1,425			4.9	%	$	93,316	$	87,176	$	6,140			7.0	%

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was $6.3 million for an effective tax rate of 33.0 percent, compared with $4.4 million for an effective tax rate of 26.6 percent in the third quarter of 2005. Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $18.2 million, representing an effective tax rate of 33.7 percent, compared to $14.8 million for an effective tax rate of 30.5 percent for the same 2005 period. The effective tax rate for the 2006 third quarter and both 2005 periods was lowered by the reduction in previously accrued taxes due to reduced risk on certain tax contingencies. In addition, the effective rates were affected in the 2005 periods by lower estimated pretax income and an increase in nontaxable adjustments relative to taxable income.

Balance Sheet Analysis

Securities Available for Sale

The securities portfolio, all of which is classified as available for sale, is a component of the Corporation’s Asset Liability Management (ALM) strategy. The decision to purchase or sell securities is based upon

32

liquidity needs, changes in interest rates, changes in the Bank’s risk tolerance, the composition of the rest of the balance sheet, and other factors. Securities available for sale are accounted for at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded net of tax as a component of other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity unless the unrealized losses are considered other-than-temporary.

The fair value of the securities portfolio is determined by various third party sources. Valuations are determined as of a date within close proximity to the end of the reporting period based on available quoted market prices or quoted market prices for similar securities if a quoted market price is not available.

At September 30, 2006, securities available for sale were $899.1 million, or 22 percent of total earning assets, compared to $899.1 million or 23 percent of total earning assets at December 31, 2005. Pretax unrealized net losses on securities available for sale were $13.5 million at September 30, 2006, compared to pretax unrealized net losses of $18.6 million at December 31, 2005. The recognition of $5.9 million of losses during the third quarter of 2006 on the sale of $160.8 million of securities, along with an increase in market interest rates led to the reduction in the unrealized losses between year-end 2005 and September 30, 2006. The unrealized losses in the securities portfolio have primarily resulted from the rise in interest rates over the past few years. The Corporation has been purchasing shorter-duration securities with more predictable cash flows in a variety of interest rate scenarios as part of its overall balance sheet management. This approach has the added benefit of mitigating the risk of unrealized losses increasing due to rising interest rates and allows the Corporation to reinvest the cash flows of the portfolio into higher-rate securities or fund loan growth in a rising interest rate environment. During the third quarter, proceeds from the aforementioned sales contributed to the purchase of $178.7 million of securities, principally mortgage- and asset-backed securities.

Loan Portfolio

The Corporation’s loan portfolio consists of six major categories: Commercial Non Real Estate, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Mortgage, Home Equity, and Consumer. Pricing is driven by quality, loan size, loan tenor, prepayment risk, the Corporation’s relationship with the customer, competition, and other factors. The Corporation is primarily a secured lender in all of these loan categories. The terms of the Corporation’s loans are generally five years or less with the exception of home equity lines and residential mortgages, for which the maturity can extend out to 30 years. In addition, the Corporation has a program in which it buys and sells portions of commercial real estate, commercial non real estate and construction loans (primarily originated in the Southeastern region of the United States), both participations and syndications, from financial institutions with which the Corporation has established relationships. This program enables the Corporation to diversify both its geographic and its total exposure risk.

Gross loans increased $145.9 million, or 5 percent annualized, to $3.1 billion at September 30, 2006 compared to $2.95 billion at December 31, 2005. The growth was driven by commercial real estate and construction loans, which increased $124.7 million and $91.5 million, respectively. Consumer loans also contributed with an increase of $11.3 million from the end of the previous year. Mortgage loans declined $37.4 million due, in part, to normal loan amortization and the Corporation’s strategy of selling most of its new mortgage production in the secondary market. Home equity loans declined $36.6 million partly as a result of customers refinancing adjustable rate home equity loans into fixed-rate first mortgage loans. Commercial non real estate loans also declined $7.5 million. In late 2005 and early 2006, the Corporation expanded into the Raleigh, North Carolina market with four de novo financial centers. At September 30, 2006, First Charter had $108.1 million in loan balances from the Raleigh market. Also affecting loan balances was an $8.1 million reduction of loans, primarily consumer loans, sold in connection with the previously mentioned sale of two financial centers during the third quarter of 2006.

During the third quarter of 2006, approximately $93.9 million of consumer loans secured by real estate were transferred from the consumer loan category to the home equity ($13.5 million) and mortgage ($80.4 million) loan categories to make the balance sheet presentation more consistent with bank regulatory definitions. The balance sheet transfer had no effect on credit reporting, underwriting, reported results of operations, or liquidity. Prior period-end balances have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation.

33

Composition of the loan portfolio follows:

Table Nine
Loan Portfolio Composition

	September 30			Percent of			December 31			Percent of
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			Total Loans			2005			Total Loans
Commercial real estate	$	905,299			29.3	%	$	780,597			26.5	%
Commercial non real estate		225,874			7.3			233,409			7.9
Construction		608,899			19.7			517,392			17.6
Mortgage		623,271			20.2			660,720			22.4
Home equity		458,545			14.8			495,181			16.8
Consumer		269,932			8.7			258,619			8.8
Total portfolio loans		3,091,820			100.0	%		2,945,918			100.0	%
Allowance for loan losses		(29,919	)					(28,725	)
Unearned income		(37	)					(173	)
Portfolio loans, net	$	3,061,864					$	2,917,020

Deposits

Deposits totaled $3.0 billion at September 30, 2006, a $155.4 million increase from December 31, 2005. Period-end core deposits (money market, demand, and savings accounts) increased $54.2 million to $1.5 billion at September 30, 2006. Retail certificates of deposit (CDs) increased $80.8 million from December 31, 2005, to $997.4 million at September 30, 2006. The increase was largely driven by continued customer preferences for the higher yields offered by CDs relative to other bank deposit products. The Corporation uses brokered CDs, which increased $20.3 million to $425.5 million, as an alternative source of cost-effective funding. The sale of two financial centers in the third quarter reduced period-end deposits by $38.0 million. Included in the deposits sold were $5.7 million in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, $18.1 million in interest checking, money market, and savings deposits, and $14.2 million in CDs.

Other Borrowings

Other borrowings consist of Federal Funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper and other short-term borrowings, and long-term borrowings. The Bank had available federal funds lines totaling $160.0 million with none outstanding at September 30, 2006, compared to $25.0 million outstanding at December 31, 2005. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $199.3 million at September 30, 2006, compared to $287.3 million at December 31, 2005.

The Corporation issues commercial paper as another source of short-term funding. Commercial paper outstanding at September 30, 2006, was $18.6 million, compared to $58.4 million at December 31, 2005.

Other short-term borrowings include FHLB borrowings with an original maturity of one year or less. During the first nine months of 2006, short-term FHLB borrowings decreased $14.0 million to $126.0 million as short-term funding needs were met by deposit growth.

Long-term borrowings represent FHLB borrowings with original maturities greater than one year and subordinated debentures related to trust preferred securities (Trust Securities). At September 30, 2006, the Bank had $626.0 million of long-term FHLB borrowings, compared to $496.0 million at December 31, 2005. In addition, the Corporation had $61.9 million of subordinated debentures at both September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

34

Credit Risk Management

The Corporation’s credit risk policy and procedures are centralized for every loan type. In addition, all mortgage, consumer and home equity loans are centrally decisioned. All loans flow through an independent closing unit to ensure proper documentation. Finally, all known collection or problem loans are centrally managed by experienced workout personnel. To monitor the effectiveness of policies and procedures, Management maintains a set of asset quality standards for past due, nonaccrual and watch list loans and monitors the trends of these standards over time. These standards are approved by the Board of Directors and reviewed quarterly with the Board of Directors for compliance.

Loan Administration and Underwriting

The Bank’s Chief Risk Officer is responsible for the continuous assessment of the Bank’s risk profile as well as making any necessary adjustments to policies and procedures. Commercial loan relationships of less than $750,000 may be approved by experienced commercial loan officers, within their loan authority. Commercial and commercial real estate loans are approved by signature authority requiring at least two experienced officers for relationships greater than $750,000. The exceptions to this include City Executives (senior loan officers) who are authorized to approve relationships up to $1.0 million. An independent Risk Manager is involved in the approval of commercial and commercial real estate relationships that exceed $1.0 million. All relationships greater than $2.0 million receive a comprehensive annual review by either the senior credit analysts or lending officers of the Bank, which is then reviewed by the independent Risk Managers and/or the final approval officer with the appropriate signature authority. Relationships totaling $5.0 million or more are further reviewed by senior lending officers of the Bank, the Chief Risk Officer, and the Credit Risk Management Committee comprised of executive and senior management. In addition, relationships totaling $10.0 million or more are reviewed by the Board of Directors’ Credit and Compliance Committee. These oversight committees provide policy, process, product and specific relationship direction to the lending personnel. As of September 30, 2006, the Corporation had a legal lending limit of $62.3 million and a general target-lending limit of $10.0 million per relationship.

The Corporation’s loan portfolio consists of loans made for a variety of commercial and consumer purposes. Because commercial loans are made based to a great extent on the Corporation’s assessment of a borrower’s income, cash flow, character and ability to repay, such loans are viewed as involving a higher degree of credit risk than is the case with residential mortgage loans or consumer loans. To manage this risk, the Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio is managed under a defined process which includes underwriting standards and risk assessment, procedures for loan approvals, loan grading, ongoing identification and management of credit deterioration and portfolio reviews to assess loss exposure and to ascertain compliance with the Corporation’s credit policies and procedures.

In general, consumer loans (including mortgage and home equity) have a lower risk profile than commercial loans. Commercial loans (including commercial real estate, commercial non real estate and construction loans) are generally larger in size and more complex than consumer loans. Commercial real estate loans are deemed less risky than commercial non real estate and construction loans, because the collateral value of real estate generally maintains its value better than non real estate or construction collateral. Consumer loans, which are smaller in size and more geographically diverse across the Corporation’s entire primary market area, provide risk diversity across the portfolio. Because mortgage loans are secured by first liens on the consumer’s residential real estate, they are the Corporation’s lowest risk profile loan type. Home equity loans are deemed less risky than unsecured consumer loans as home equity loans and lines are secured by first or second deeds of trust on the borrower’s residential real estate. A centralized decisioning process is in place to control the risk of the consumer, home equity, and mortgage loan portfolio. The consumer real estate appraisal process is also centralized relative to appraisal engagement, appraisal review, and appraiser quality assessment. These processes are detailed in the underwriting guidelines, which cover each retail loan product type from underwriting, servicing, compliance issues and closing procedures.

35

At September 30, 2006, the substantial majority of the total loan portfolio, as well as a substantial portion of the commercial and real estate portfolio, represents loans to borrowers within the Charlotte and Raleigh Metro regions. The diverse economic base of these regions tends to provide a stable lending environment; however, an economic downturn in the Charlotte region, the Corporation’s primary market area, could adversely affect its business. No significant concentration of credit risk has been identified due to the diverse industrial base in this region.

Additionally, the Corporation’s loan portfolio consists of certain non-traditional loan products. Some of these products include interest only loans, loans with initial interest rates that are below the market interest rate for the initial period of the loan-term and may increase when that period ends and loans with a high loan-to-value ratio. Based on the Corporation’s assessment, these products do not give rise to a concentration of credit risk.

Derivatives

The Corporation enters into interest rate swap agreements or other derivative transactions as business conditions warrant. As previously discussed, the Corporation repositioned its balance sheet in the fourth quarter of 2005. As a result, the Corporation extinguished $222 million in debt and terminated the related interest rate swaps. As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Corporation had no interest rate swap agreements or other derivative transactions outstanding.

Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets are comprised of nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned (OREO). The nonaccrual status is determined after a loan is 90 days past due or when deemed not collectible in full as to principal or interest, unless in management’s opinion collection of both principal and interest is assured by way of collateralization, guarantees, or other security and the loan is in the process of collection. OREO represents real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu thereof and is generally carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs to sell.

Management’s policy for any accruing loan greater than 90 days past due is to perform an analysis of the loan, including a consideration of the financial position of the borrower and any guarantor, as well as the value of the collateral, and use this information to make an assessment as to whether collectibility of the principal and interest appears probable. If such collectibility is not probable, the loans are placed on nonaccrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when management determines, based on an evaluation of the underlying collateral together with the borrower’s payment record and financial condition, that the borrower has the ability and intent to meet the contractual obligations of the loan agreement. As of September 30, 2006, no loans were 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest.

Nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest follow:

Table Ten
Nonperforming Assets and Delinquent Loans

	September 30			June 30			March 31			December 31			September 30
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2006			2006			2005			2005
Nonaccrual loans	$	7,090		$	7,763		$	9,211		$	10,811		$	7,071
Loans 90 days or more past due accruing interest		—			—			—			—			—
Total nonperforming loans		7,090			7,763			9,211			10,811			7,071
Other real estate		5,601			5,902			6,072			5,124			6,079
Nonperforming assets	$	12,691		$	13,665		$	15,283		$	15,935		$	13,150
Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total portfolio loans		0.23	%		0.25	%		0.31	%		0.37	%		0.24	%
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of:
Total assets		0.29			0.31			0.36			0.38			0.28
Total portfolio loans and other real estate		0.41			0.44			0.51			0.54			0.45
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans		4.22	x		3.80	x		3.20	x		2.66	x		4.21	x

36

Nonaccrual loans totaled $7.1 million at September 30, 2006, representing a $3.7 million decrease from $10.8 million at December 31, 2005. During the first quarter of 2006, there was a $1.6 million paydown on a commercial loan included in nonaccrual loans at year-end 2005. In addition to this paydown, the transfer of several consumer loans to OREO contributed to the $3.7 million decrease in nonaccrual loans. The aforementioned transfer of several consumer loans from nonaccrual loans into OREO, partially offset by a $0.4 million commercial loan write-down during the second quarter of 2006 led to the $0.5 million increase in OREO between December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2006. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and other real estate owned decreased to 0.41 percent at September 30, 2006, compared to 0.54 percent at December 31, 2005 and 0.45 percent at September 30, 2005.

Nonaccrual loans at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, were not concentrated in any one industry and primarily consisted of loans secured by real estate. Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of loans may increase or decrease as economic conditions change. Management takes current economic conditions into consideration when estimating the allowance for loan losses. SeeAllowance for Loan Lossesfor a more detailed discussion.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses consists of three components: (i) valuation allowances computed on impaired loans in accordance with SFAS 114; (ii) valuation allowances determined by applying historical loss rates to those loans not specifically identified as impaired; and (iii) valuation allowances for factors which management believes are not reflected in the historical loss rates or that otherwise need to be considered when estimating the allowance for loan losses. These three components are estimated quarterly and, along with a narrative analysis, comprise the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses model. The resulting components are used by management to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

All estimates of loan portfolio risk, including the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, are subject to general and local economic conditions, among other factors, which are unpredictable and beyond the Corporation’s control. Because a significant portion of the loan portfolio is comprised of real estate loans and loans to area businesses, the Corporation is subject to risk in the real estate market and changes in the economic conditions in its primary market areas. Changes in these areas can increase or decrease the provision for loan losses.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Corporation made no changes to its estimated loss percentages for economic factors. As a part of its quarterly assessment of the allowance for loan losses, the Corporation reviews key local, regional and national economic information and assesses its impact on the allowance for loan losses. Based on its review for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Corporation noted that economic conditions are mixed; however, management concluded that the impact on borrowers and local industries in the Corporation’s primary market areas did not change significantly during the period. Accordingly, the Corporation did not modify its loss estimate percentage attributable to economic factors in its allowance for loan losses model.

The Corporation continuously reviews its portfolio for any concentrations of loans to any one borrower or industry. To analyze its concentrations, the Corporation prepares various reports showing total risk concentrations to borrowers by industry, as well as reports showing total risk concentrations to one borrower. At the present time, the Corporation does not believe it is overly concentrated in any industry or specific borrower and therefore has made no allocations of allowances for loan losses for this factor for any of the periods presented.

The Corporation also monitors the amount of operational risk that exists in the portfolio. This would include the front-end underwriting, documentation and closing processes associated with the lending decision. The percent of additional allocation for the operational reserve has not changed in recent periods.

37

Changes in the allowance for loan losses follow:

Table Eleven
Allowance For Loan Losses

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30						September 30
(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Balance at beginning of period	$	29,520		$	29,032		$	28,725		$	26,872
Charge-offs
Commercial non real estate		341			673			700			1,529
Commercial real estate		151			605			486			1,463
Construction		—			7			—			7
Mortgage		83			12			104			87
Home equity		202			363			903			792
Consumer		530			537			1,478			1,753
Total charge-offs		1,307			2,197			3,671			5,631
Recoveries
Commercial non real estate		96			5			535			527
Mortgage		13			—			13			36
Home equity		1			—			1			—
Consumer		191			178			512			436
Total recoveries		301			183			1,061			999
Net charge-offs		1,006			2,014			2,610			4,632
Provision for loan losses		1,405			2,770			3,804			7,548
Allowance related to loans sold		—			—			—			—
Balance at end of period	$	29,919		$	29,788		$	29,919		$	29,788
Average portfolio loans	$	3,070,286		$	2,896,794		$	3,010,654		$	2,743,156
Net charge-offs to average portfolio loans (annualized)		0.13	%		0.28	%		0.12	%		0.23	%
Allowance for loan losses to portfolio loans		0.97			1.02			0.97			1.02

The allowance for loan losses was $29.9 million, or 0.97 percent of portfolio loans at September 30, 2006, compared to $28.7 million, or 0.98 percent of portfolio loans at December 31, 2005 and $29.8 million or 1.02 percent of portfolio loans at September 30, 2005. The lower allowance for loan loss ratio compared to a year ago resulted from the Corporation’s improved credit quality trends.

Management considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover inherent losses in the Corporation’s loan portfolio as of the date of the financial statements. Management believes it has established the allowance in consideration of the current and expected future economic environment. While management uses the best information available to make evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic and other conditions. Additionally, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowances for loan losses. Such agencies may require the recognition of adjustments to the allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examinations.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is the amount charged to earnings, which is necessary to maintain an adequate and appropriate allowance for loan losses. Accordingly, the factors, which influence changes in the allowance for loan losses, have a direct effect on the provision for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses changes from period to period as a result of a number of factors, the most significant of which for the Corporation include the following: (i) changes in the amounts of loans outstanding, which are used to estimate current probable loan losses; (ii) current charge-offs and recoveries of loans; (iii) changes in impaired loan valuation allowances; (iv) changes in credit grades within the portfolio, which arise from a deterioration or an improvement in the performance of the borrower; (v) changes in loss percentages; and (vi) changes in the mix of types of loans. In addition, the Corporation considers other, more subjective factors, which impact the credit quality of the portfolio as a whole and estimates

38

allocations of allowance for loan losses for these factors, as well. These factors include loan concentrations, economic conditions and operational risks. Changes in these components of the allowance can arise from fluctuations in the underlying percentages used as related loss estimates for these factors, as well as variations in the portfolio balances to which they are applied. The net change in all of these components of the allowance for loan losses results in the provision for loan losses. For a more detailed discussion of the Corporation’s process for estimating the allowance for loan losses, seeAllowance for Loan Losses.

The provision for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 totaled $1.4 million and $3.8 million, respectively. This compares to a provision for loan losses of $2.8 million and $7.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. The decrease in the provision for loan losses was primarily attributable to improved credit quality trends and a decrease in net charge-offs. Net charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2006 totaled $1.0 million, or 0.13 percent of average portfolio loans, compared to $2.0 million, or 0.28 percent of average portfolio loans for the same 2005 period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net charges-offs were $2.6 million, or 0.12 percent of average portfolio loans, compared to $4.6 million, or 0.23 percent of average portfolio loans for the same 2005 period.

Market Risk Management

Asset-Liability Management and Interest Rate Risk

The Corporation’s primary interest rate risk management objective is to maximize net interest income across a broad range of interest rate scenarios, subject to risk tolerance approval by Management and the Board of Directors. Management primarily analyzes interest rate risk in two fundamentally different ways: earnings simulation and market value of equity. The first method uses an earnings simulation model to assess the amount of near-term earnings at risk (net interest income at risk over a 12-month horizon) due to changes in interest rates. In analyzing interest rate sensitivity for policy measurement, net interest income is simulated in plus and minus 200 basis point rate shock scenarios relative to the implied forward interest rate scenario for the next 12 months. At September 30, 2006, First Charter estimated that its net interest income at risk to a plus and minus 200 basis point rate shock relative to the implied forwards was a positive 3 percent and negative 4 percent, respectively.

The second method management uses to analyze interest rate risk is to calculate the market value of equity for the Corporation. This calculation discounts the anticipated cash flows of a static balance sheet using current rates. Management then recalculates the Corporation’s market value of equity in plus and minus 200 basis point rate shock scenarios. The Corporation has established a 15 percent limit for the market value of equity at risk for a 200 basis point rate shock. At September 30, 2006, the Corporation’s market value at risk for a 200 basis point increase and decrease relative to the implied forward rate forecast was a negative 9 percent and positive 4 percent, respectively.

Management also analyzes interest rate risk in parallel current and forward interest rate scenarios beyond the 200 basis point rate shocks mentioned above. In addition, Management analyzes interest rate risk under various interest rate scenarios that involve changes in the relationship between various market rate indices.

Management uses a variety of tools to manage the Corporation’s interest rate risk including, but not limited to, loan and deposit pricing, its choice of tenor and repricing characteristics on its wholesale borrowings, its choice of the tenor and repricing characteristics of its investment portfolio, and from time to time, various derivative products.

Table Twelvesummarizes the expected maturities and weighted average effective yields and rates associated with certain of the Corporation’s significant non-trading financial instruments. Cash and cash equivalents, federal funds sold, and interest-bearing bank deposits are excluded fromTable Twelve as their respective carrying values approximate fair value. These financial instruments generally expose the

39

Corporation to insignificant market risk as they have either no stated maturities or an average maturity of less than 30 days and interest rates that approximate market rates. However, these financial instruments could expose the Corporation to interest rate risk by requiring more or less reliance on alternative funding sources, such as long-term debt. The mortgage-backed securities are shown at their weighted-average expected life, obtained from an independent evaluation of the average remaining life of each security based on expected prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgages at September 30, 2006. These expected maturities, weighted-average effective yields, and fair values would change if interest rates change. Demand deposits, money market accounts, and certain savings deposits are presented in the earliest maturity window because they have no stated maturity. For interest rate risk analytical purposes, these non-maturity deposits are believed to have average lives longer than shown here.

Table Twelve
Market Risk

				Expected Maturity
(Dollars in thousands)	Total			1 Year		2 Years		3 Years		4 Years		5 Years		Thereafter
Assets
Debt securities
Fixed rate
Cost	$	747,034		$	350,054	$	193,880	$	148,498	$	25,362	$	22,257	$	6,983
Weighted-average effective yield		4.51	%
Fair value	$	737,063
Variable rate
Cost	$	165,601			29,209		29,283		29,392		4,276		1,177		72,264
Weighted-average effective yield		4.48	%
Fair value	$	162,057
Loans and loans held for sale
Fixed rate
Book value	$	877,741			189,244		182,476		138,197		114,399		113,259		140,166
Weighted-average effective yield		6.68	%
Fair value	$	862,346
Variable rate
Book value	$	2,224,965			930,475		318,487		216,499		107,950		87,664		563,890
Weighted-average effective yield		7.30	%
Fair value	$	2,197,658
Liabilities
Deposits
Fixed rate
Book value	$	1,422,867			1,252,839		140,214		18,014		6,883		4,578		339
Weighted-average effective yield		4.51	%
Fair value	$	1,426,787
Variable rate
Book value	$	1,079,134			274,849		274,073		273,815		120,211		64,099		72,087
Weighted-average effective yield		1.95	%
Fair value	$	1,001,802
Long-term borrowings
Fixed rate
Book value	$	305,953			160,052		20,055		75,058		61		50,053		674
Weighted-average effective yield		4.25	%
Fair value	$	299,489
Variable rate
Book value	$	381,857			200,000		—		120,000		—		—		61,857
Weighted-average effective yield		5.56	%
Fair value	$	380,838

40

Off-Balance-Sheet Risk

The Corporation is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and may require collateral from the borrower if deemed necessary by the Corporation. Included in loan commitments are commitments of $35.4 million to cover customer deposit account overdrafts should they occur. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party up to a stipulated amount and with specified terms and conditions. Standby letters of credit are recorded as a liability by the Corporation at the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Commitments to extend credit are not recorded as an asset or liability by the Corporation until the instrument is exercised. Refer toNote 9of the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of commitments. The Corporation does not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements, other than the Trust Securities.

The following table presents aggregated information and expected maturities of commitments as of September 30, 2006.

Table Thirteen
Commitments

	Less than		1-3		4-5		Over 5
(In thousands)	1 year		Years		Years		Years		Total
Loan commitments	$	543,109	$	183,197	$	31,159	$	49,215	$	806,680
Lines of credit		33,669		3,114		1,691		441,480		479,954
Standby letters of credit		17,615		3,266		—		—		20,881
Total commitments	$	594,393	$	189,577	$	32,850	$	490,695	$	1,307,515

Commitments to extend credit, including loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and commercial letters of credit do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, in that these commitments often expire without being drawn upon.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity is the ability to maintain cash flows adequate to fund operations and meet obligations and other commitments on a timely and cost-effective basis. Liquidity is provided by the ability to attract retail deposits, by current earnings, and by a strong capital base that enables the Corporation to use alternative funding sources that complement normal sources. Management’s asset-liability policy includes optimizing net interest income while continuing to provide adequate liquidity to meet continuing loan demand and deposit withdrawal requirements and to service normal operating expenses.

Liquidity is managed at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the Corporation. The second is the liquidity of the Bank. The management of liquidity at both levels is essential, because the Corporation and the Bank have different funding needs and sources, and each are subject to certain regulatory guidelines and requirements.

The primary source of funding for the Corporation includes dividends received from the Bank and proceeds from the issuance of common stock. In addition, the Corporation had a $25.0 million bank line of credit with no outstandings and commercial paper outstandings of $18.6 million at September 30, 2006. Primary uses of funds for the Corporation include repayment of commercial paper, share repurchases, and dividends paid to shareholders. During 2005, the Corporation issued Trust Securities through specially formed trusts. The Trust Securities are presented as long-term borrowings in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and are includable in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations.

41

Primary sources of funding for the Bank include customer deposits, wholesale deposits, other borrowings, loan repayments, and available-for-sale securities. The Bank has access to federal funds lines from various banks and borrowings from the Federal Reserve discount window. In addition to these sources, the Bank is a member of the FHLB, which provides access to FHLB lending sources. At September 30, 2006, the Bank had an available line of credit with the FHLB totaling $1.3 billion with $752.0 million outstanding. At September 30, 2006, the Bank also had $160.0 million of federal funds lines with none outstanding. Primary uses of funds include repayment of maturing obligations and growing the loan portfolio.

Management believes the Corporation’s and the Bank’s sources of liquidity are adequate to meet loan demand, operating needs, and deposit withdrawal requirements.

Capital Management

The Corporation views capital as its most valuable and most expensive funding source. The objective of effective capital management is to generate above-market returns on equity to the Corporation’s shareholders while maintaining adequate regulatory capital ratios. Some of the Corporation’s primary uses of capital include funding growth, asset acquisition, dividend payments, and common stock repurchases.

Shareholders’ equity at September 30, 2006, increased to $352.6 million, representing 8.0 percent of period-end assets, compared to $323.6 million, or 7.6 percent, of period-end assets at December 31, 2005. The increase was due mainly to net income of $35.8 million and $7.4 million of stock issued under stock-based compensation plans and the Corporation’s dividend reinvestment plan. These increases were partially offset by cash dividends of $0.58 per common share, which resulted in cash dividend declarations of $17.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. In addition, the accumulated other comprehensive loss (after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities) decreased $3.1 million to $8.2 million at September 30, 2006, compared to $11.3 million at December 31, 2005.

On January 23, 2002, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1.5 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock. As of September 30, 2006, the Corporation had repurchased a total of approximately 1.4 million shares of its common stock at an average per-share price of $17.52 under this authorization, which has reduced shareholders’ equity by $24.5 million. No shares were repurchased under this authorization during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2006.

On October 24, 2003, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1.5 million additional shares of the Corporation’s common stock. At September 30, 2006, no shares had been repurchased under this authorization.

During 2005, the Corporation issued Trust Securities through specially formed trusts. The Trust Securities are presented as long-term borrowings in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and are includable in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations.

The Corporation’s and the Bank’s various regulators have issued regulatory capital guidelines for U.S. banking organizations. Failure to meet the capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material effect on the Corporation’s financial statements. At September 30, 2006, the Corporation and the Bank were classified as “well capitalized” under these regulatory frameworks.

42

The Corporation’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios at September 30, 2006 follow:

Table Fourteen
Capital Ratios

						For Capital
						Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized
	Actual							Minimum					Minimum
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Tier I Capital (to Adjusted Average Assets)
First Charter Corporation	$	398,581		9.18	%	$	173,602		4.00	%	None		None
First Charter Bank		385,177		8.91			172,998		4.00		$	216,247		5.00	%
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
First Charter Corporation	$	398,581		11.19	%	$	142,490		4.00	%	None		None
First Charter Bank		385,177		10.82			142,368		4.00		$	213,551		6.00	%
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
First Charter Corporation	$	428,666		12.03	%	$	284,980		8.00	%	None		None
First Charter Bank		415,096		11.66			284,736		8.00		$	355,919		10.00	%

Regulatory Recommendations

Management is not presently aware of any current recommendations to the Corporation or to the Bank by regulatory authorities, which if they were to be implemented, would have a material effect on the Corporation’s liquidity, capital resources, or operations.

Accounting Matters

In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 155,Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments. SFAS 155 is an amendment of SFAS 133 and SFAS 140. SFAS 155 permits companies to elect, on a deal-by-deal basis, to apply a fair-value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. The Corporation will be required to apply the provisions of SFAS 155 to all financial instruments acquired or issued after January 1, 2007. The Corporation does not expect SFAS 155 will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 156,Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets. SFAS 156 amends SFAS 140. SFAS 156 requires that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value. For subsequent measurements, SFAS 156 permits companies to choose between using an amortization method or a fair value measurement method for reporting purposes. The Corporation will be required to adopt this standard beginning January 1, 2007. The Corporation does not expect SFAS 156 will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement 109. The Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions and requires the Corporation to recognize management’s best estimate of the impact of a tax position only if it is considered “more likely than not,” as defined in SFAS 5,Accounting for Contingencies, of being sustained on audit based solely on the technical merits of the tax position. The Corporation will be required to adopt this Interpretation beginning January 1, 2007. Management is currently evaluating the effect of this Interpretation and its effect on the consolidated financial statements.

43

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157,Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement does not require any new fair value measurements, however, does clarify the proper measurement of fair value as the hypothetical price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (an exit price), not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or receive the assumed liability (an entry price) at the measurement date. The Corporation will be required to adopt this standard beginning January 1, 2008. The Corporation does not expect SFAS 157 will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans(SFAS 158). SFAS 158 is an amendment of SFAS 8, SFAS 88, SFAS 106, SFAS 132(R). SFAS 158 requires an entity to recognize the funded status of its benefit plans in its statement of financial position. The statement also requires the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period, but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs, to be recognized as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax. The statement requires the defined benefit plan assets and obligations to be measured as of the date of the entity’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position. Additional disclosure in the footnotes of the financial statements is also required relating to certain effects on net period benefit costs for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains and losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. The Corporation will be required to adopt this standard for the year ended December 31, 2006. Management is currently evaluating this statement and its effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108),Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 is an amendment to Part 211 of Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations. SAB 108 provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior-year misstatements in quantifying current-year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. The bulletin recommends registrants quantify the effect of correcting all misstatements, including both the carryover and the reversing effects of prior-year misstatements, on the current-year financial statements. The application of the guidance is encouraged in any report for an interim period of the Corporation’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. Management is currently evaluating this statement and its effect on the consolidated financial statements.

From time to time, the FASB issues exposure drafts for proposed statements of financial accounting standards. Such exposure drafts are subject to comment from the public, to revisions by the FASB and to final issuance by the FASB as statements of financial accounting standards. Management considers the effect of the proposed statements on the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and monitors the status of changes to and proposed effective dates of exposure drafts.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

SeeManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Market Risk Management — Asset-Liability Management and Interest Rate Riskon pages 38-39 for Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a)Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Registrant’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in its reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,

44

summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities Exchange Commission rules and forms.

(b)Changes in internal control over financial reporting. During the Registrant’s third fiscal quarter, there has been no change in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

45

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Corporation and the Bank are defendants in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operations, liquidity, or financial position of the Corporation or the Bank.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

As discussed in this report, on June 1, 2006 the Corporation entered into and announced a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger to acquire all outstanding shares of GBC Bancorp, Inc. (GBC), parent of Gwinnett Banking Company (Merger). The Merger closed effective November 1, 2006. The following risk factor is being provided in addition to the risk factors previously disclosed in “Item 1A Risk Factors” of Part I of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Risks Associated with the Merger

The Corporation may fail to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings associated with the Merger. Achievement of these benefits and cost savings relies heavily on the successful integration of the combined businesses, which also may divert the attention of management. Failure to successfully integrate and achieve these benefits and cost savings could have a material adverse affect on the Corporation. In addition, the Corporation has had limited experience in the competitive greater Atlanta metropolitan market area, and there may be unexpected challenges and difficulties that could adversely affect the Corporation following the consummation of the Merger.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     (c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

					Total Number of
					Shares Purchased as		Maximum Number of
					Part of Publicly		Shares that May Yet Be
	Total Number of		Average Price		Announced Plans or		Purchased Under the
Period	Shares Purchased		Paid per Share		Programs		Plans or Programs
July 1, 2006 - July 31, 2006		—		—		—		1,625,400
August 1, 2006 - August 31, 2006		—		—		—		1,625,400
September 1, 2006 - September 30, 2006		—		—		—		1,625,400
Total		—		—		—		1,625,400

On January 24, 2002, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan to acquire up to 1.5 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock from time to time. As of September 30, 2006, the Corporation had repurchased 1,374,600 shares under this authorization.

On November 3, 2003, the Corporation’s Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase plan to acquire up to an additional 1.5 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock from time to time. As of September 30, 2006, no shares have been repurchased under this authorization. These stock repurchase plans have no set expiration or termination date.

46

There were no repurchases of the Corporation’s common stock during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2006. The maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs was 1,625,400 at September 30, 2006.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not Applicable.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not Applicable.

47

Item 5. Other Information

(a) Effective October 25, 2006, J. Scott Ensor (“Mr. Ensor”), an existing employee of the Corporation, became Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Corporation and the Bank. On November 6, 2006, the Corporation entered into an amended Change in Control Agreement with Mr. Ensor (as, amended, the “Change in Control Agreement”). The terms of the Change in Control Agreement provide for continued payment of base salary and average bonus amounts, as well as certain continued benefits provided to employees generally, following a “change in control” of the Corporation. The benefits to be received pursuant to these agreements will be paid to Mr. Ensor for a period of twenty-four months following a change in control. The payments and benefits to be received pursuant to the Change in Control Agreement will not exceed the limitations imposed by Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

For purposes of the Change in Control Agreement, a “change in control” is generally defined to include a merger or similar transaction involving the Corporation in which the Corporation’s shareholders receive less than 50% of the voting stock of the surviving corporation, the sale or transfer of substantially all the Corporation ‘s assets, certain acquisitions of more than 20% of the Corporation ‘s common stock by any person or group other than a person or group who owned more than 5% of the Corporation ‘s common stock as of the date of such agreements unless prior approval of the Corporation ‘s Board of Directors is received, certain instances in which the composition of the Corporation’s Board of Directors changes by more than 50% during a two year period, or any other transaction that would constitute a change in control required to be reported by the Corporation in a proxy statement or the acquisition of control of the Corporation under applicable federal banking laws.

To be entitled to payments upon such a change in control, (a) Mr. Ensor’s employment must be terminated by the Corporation or the Bank other than for cause, or (b) Mr. Ensor must terminate his employment for good reason, in either case within one year following the change in control. “Cause” is defined generally as willful misconduct, use of narcotics or alcohol in a manner that affects Mr. Ensor’s duties, conviction of a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, embezzlement or theft from the Corporation or the Bank, gross inattention to or dereliction of duty, or performance of any other willful acts which Mr. Ensor knew or reasonably should have known would be materially detrimental to the Corporation or the Bank. “Good reason” generally means a material reduction in Mr. Ensor’s duties or a change in title resulting in reduction of his responsibilities, a material reduction in his salary or bonus, or his relocation to an area farther than a specified distance from his primary employment location.

The forgoing summary of the Change in Control Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Change in Control Agreement, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.2 and is incorporated herein by reference. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is being filed within four business days of November 6, 2006. Consequently, the Change in Control Agreement is being disclosed herein, rather than under Item 1.01 of Form 8-K.

Item 6.Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibits
10.1	Transition Agreement, dated September 27, 2006, by and between the Registrant and Richard A. Manley, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 27, 2006.
10.2	Amended Change in Control Agreement, dated November 6, 2006, by and between the Registrant and J. Scott Ensor.

48

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibits
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

49

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION
		(Registrant)
Date: November 9, 2006	By:	/s/ Charles A. Caswell
		Charles A. Caswell
		Executive Vice President,
		Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
		(Principal Financial Officer duly authorized to sign on behalf of the registrant)

50