- UDR Dashboard
- Financials
- Filings
-
Holdings
- Transcripts
- ETFs
- Insider
- Institutional
- Shorts
-
8-K Filing
UDR (UDR) 8-KRegulation FD Disclosure
Filed: 19 Mar 07, 12:00am
Exhibit 99.2
Mature Market Trends As of February 2007 P R E D I C T A B I L I T Y through H I G H P E R F O R M A N C E |
Safe Harbor Statement Statements contained in this presentation, which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements, as the term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the Company's use of words such as, "expects," "plans," "estimates," "projects," "intends," "believes," and similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which can cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated, due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, unfavorable changes in apartment demand or supply in the Company's markets and the effect on occupancy and rental rates; changing economic conditions; changes in household growth or population; the impact of competition and competitive pricing; acquisitions or new developments may not achieve anticipated results; delays in completing developments and lease-ups on schedule; difficulties in selling existing apartment communities on favorable terms or the timing and closing of planned dispositions under agreement; the shortage of available acquisition candidates; the imposition of federal taxes if we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year; failure to generate sufficient revenue, which could create refinancing risk and impair debt service payments and shareholder distributions; increases in property and liability insurance costs; risks arising from environmental issues or natural disasters; effects of the Company's accounting or other policies and other risk factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time including the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are made as of today, based upon information known to management as of the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any of its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes show that indicated results or events will not be realized. |
Definitions 3 |
Units | Feb-06 | Mar-06 | Apr-06 | May-06 | Jun-06 | Jul-06 | Aug-06 | Sep-06 | Oct-06 | Nov-06 | Dec-06 | Jan-07 | Feb-07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Rent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 1,426 | 866,689 | 887,123 | 873,996 | 872,166 | 881,204 | 901,647 | 890,184 | 887,552 | 892,944 | 909,286 | 918,578 | 924,215 | 916,145 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 1,075 | 720,900 | 739,464 | 734,389 | 737,089 | 755,414 | 769,657 | 770,844 | 771,174 | 758,640 | 770,561 | 760,369 | 775,827 | 782,482 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 1,819 | 1,717,453 | 1,761,368 | 1,792,236 | 1,811,960 | 1,844,227 | 1,815,359 | 1,777,789 | 1,804,587 | 1,783,525 | 1,791,992 | 1,783,018 | 1,799,315 | 1,784,916 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 1,226 | 797,033 | 795,010 | 780,577 | 794,863 | 806,307 | 814,373 | 858,532 | 852,172 | 858,166 | 862,069 | 850,610 | 858,030 | 855,101 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 1,584 | 918,682 | 942,187 | 940,694 | 946,084 | 957,391 | 946,192 | 975,830 | 987,209 | 961,679 | 970,753 | 975,581 | 955,449 | 978,841 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2,530 | 1,620,863 | 1,648,627 | 1,607,986 | 1,617,746 | 1,645,009 | 1,629,851 | 1,641,150 | 1,655,380 | 1,663,623 | 1,656,918 | 1,673,118 | 1,667,988 | 1,697,628 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 987 | 781,542 | 799,417 | 786,626 | 792,576 | 806,592 | 806,644 | 821,565 | 809,446 | 796,744 | 794,615 | 791,301 | 800,988 | 818,634 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver, CO | 884 | 541,010 | 547,476 | 559,015 | 560,066 | 559,572 | 575,390 | 596,588 | 613,793 | 604,470 | 602,475 | 596,686 | 576,001 | 580,752 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 1,828 | 1,117,847 | 1,114,466 | 1,089,924 | 1,101,204 | 1,116,515 | 1,135,387 | 1,130,885 | 1,131,076 | 1,119,594 | 1,102,791 | 1,096,581 | 1,101,831 | 1,124,233 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 660 | 608,623 | 623,835 | 618,510 | 622,941 | 628,713 | 634,619 | 614,067 | 634,652 | 633,064 | 604,093 | 639,516 | 609,736 | 628,081 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 5,447 | 3,316,785 | 3,341,356 | 3,325,139 | 3,287,430 | 3,346,110 | 3,354,543 | 3,364,334 | 3,363,731 | 3,354,963 | 3,328,467 | 3,316,814 | 3,317,386 | 3,355,639 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 1,557 | 1,144,133 | 1,167,631 | 1,189,829 | 1,201,555 | 1,179,835 | 1,189,374 | 1,233,797 | 1,215,793 | 1,190,809 | 1,173,534 | 1,166,499 | 1,157,651 | 1,157,187 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 933 | 1,191,626 | 1,186,492 | 1,182,607 | 1,202,288 | 1,190,185 | 1,125,517 | 1,163,227 | 1,236,946 | 1,261,785 | 1,261,511 | 1,258,517 | 1,241,148 | 1,242,075 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2,098 | 2,327,430 | 2,328,499 | 2,319,698 | 2,342,410 | 2,331,645 | 2,353,742 | 2,392,927 | 2,401,637 | 2,403,240 | 2,405,412 | 2,426,502 | 2,408,870 | 2,445,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 1,568 | 1,266,391 | 1,286,548 | 1,277,262 | 1,303,663 | 1,327,081 | 1,336,213 | 1,350,250 | 1,348,117 | 1,373,244 | 1,349,379 | 1,274,111 | 1,249,960 | 1,302,732 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2,580 | 1,743,792 | 1,762,710 | 1,770,531 | 1,771,579 | 1,799,221 | 1,788,737 | 1,813,710 | 1,827,738 | 1,829,912 | 1,822,466 | 1,824,018 | 1,836,197 | 1,850,925 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 1,438 | 1,167,894 | 1,194,227 | 1,183,682 | 1,197,460 | 1,207,129 | 1,190,546 | 1,201,169 | 1,216,344 | 1,188,678 | 1,204,459 | 1,205,253 | 1,202,123 | 1,182,901 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 3,352 | 4,354,312 | 4,387,608 | 4,375,709 | 4,386,169 | 4,408,663 | 4,432,329 | 4,487,328 | 4,532,068 | 4,584,531 | 4,603,786 | 4,613,070 | 4,592,195 | 4,579,599 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2,820 | 2,258,550 | 2,324,292 | 2,298,384 | 2,333,703 | 2,343,104 | 2,381,119 | 2,421,212 | 2,407,947 | 2,404,459 | 2,391,723 | 2,371,903 | 2,370,452 | 2,372,759 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2,192 | 1,819,642 | 1,854,814 | 1,844,902 | 1,867,790 | 1,837,291 | 1,835,189 | 1,859,230 | 1,839,946 | 1,832,879 | 1,831,953 | 1,824,974 | 1,828,900 | 1,831,846 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 1,156 | 936,215 | 943,868 | 914,236 | 931,654 | 946,248 | 936,661 | 955,637 | 947,745 | 964,172 | 943,806 | 919,915 | 942,971 | 914,815 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 444 | 286,403 | 296,680 | 275,829 | 283,338 | 280,843 | 281,684 | 299,210 | 296,797 | 290,194 | 296,188 | 301,638 | 292,325 | 292,254 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 841 | 475,800 | 504,039 | 492,516 | 501,768 | 513,023 | 505,591 | 507,439 | 513,276 | 506,628 | 506,047 | 492,056 | 491,921 | 473,545 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 168 | 63,707 | 64,332 | 66,424 | 64,914 | 66,661 | 66,337 | 63,547 | 69,780 | 67,824 | 67,966 | 67,638 | 67,882 | 71,765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2,302 | 1,487,977 | 1,535,837 | 1,529,345 | 1,521,400 | 1,548,301 | 1,563,676 | 1,586,033 | 1,579,484 | 1,587,991 | 1,610,840 | 1,599,231 | 1,590,317 | 1,593,431 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 820 | 744,651 | 747,544 | 777,326 | 793,039 | 807,897 | 803,240 | 777,530 | 777,619 | 792,067 | 797,236 | 781,113 | 752,590 | 754,222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 914 | 750,769 | 765,342 | 767,775 | 762,883 | 774,992 | 774,977 | 773,562 | 795,312 | 786,603 | 781,219 | 772,670 | 777,848 | 781,160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland, OR | 1,365 | 899,659 | 900,948 | 883,505 | 878,033 | 920,506 | 930,107 | 954,527 | 949,880 | 928,189 | 919,578 | 954,414 | 957,337 | 960,801 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 3,463 | 2,146,822 | 2,171,623 | 2,150,483 | 2,178,448 | 2,154,125 | 2,162,278 | 2,193,150 | 2,204,295 | 2,196,333 | 2,200,137 | 2,143,177 | 2,190,409 | 2,216,847 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 1,807 | 1,448,883 | 1,454,737 | 1,439,458 | 1,451,655 | 1,488,889 | 1,470,556 | 1,472,407 | 1,494,941 | 1,446,643 | 1,461,369 | 1,478,117 | 1,472,088 | 1,495,444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 914 | 688,702 | 705,895 | 674,872 | 694,393 | 701,705 | 704,790 | 693,946 | 679,303 | 718,178 | 699,824 | 703,035 | 702,996 | 705,530 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 1,588 | 1,816,144 | 1,785,696 | 1,785,861 | 1,790,884 | 1,838,355 | 1,851,431 | 1,808,593 | 1,872,079 | 1,916,400 | 1,931,365 | 1,887,000 | 1,922,840 | 1,914,266 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 1,074 | 851,670 | 911,671 | 905,382 | 913,257 | 929,741 | 931,345 | 954,685 | 969,485 | 939,812 | 947,068 | 938,377 | 932,865 | 919,712 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 1,775 | 2,487,195 | 2,494,327 | 2,499,997 | 2,510,939 | 2,579,226 | 2,569,593 | 2,624,843 | 2,600,069 | 2,596,356 | 2,624,386 | 2,627,716 | 2,668,964 | 2,662,601 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2,873 | 2,355,998 | 2,393,047 | 2,375,649 | 2,377,509 | 2,389,132 | 2,441,215 | 2,464,526 | 2,486,799 | 2,454,342 | 2,407,569 | 2,410,080 | 2,415,140 | 2,446,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ventura County | 119 | 147,348 | 149,118 | 146,108 | 150,182 | 149,827 | 152,309 | 150,598 | 148,066 | 149,048 | 152,111 | 154,344 | 138,154 | 147,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 1,868 | 1,253,865 | 1,290,497 | 1,264,142 | 1,285,638 | 1,319,008 | 1,298,377 | 1,336,731 | 1,323,464 | 1,328,235 | 1,314,559 | 1,305,014 | 1,283,068 | 1,272,896 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 61,495 | 49,123,006 | 49,808,349 | 49,500,604 | 49,840,673 | 50,379,688 | 50,460,595 | 50,981,581 | 51,245,701 | 51,165,965 | 51,099,512 | 50,902,554 | 50,873,975 | 51,111,533 |
Units | Feb-06 | Mar-06 | Apr-06 | May-06 | Jun-06 | Jul-06 | Aug-06 | Sep-06 | Oct-06 | Nov-06 | Dec-06 | Jan-07 | Feb-07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concessions As a % of Net Rent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 1,426 | 1.91 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.13 | % | 2.16 | % | 2.29 | % | 2.16 | % | 1.56 | % | 2.79 | % | 2.70 | % | 3.02 | % | 2.03 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.31 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 1,075 | 2.56 | % | 2.06 | % | 1.95 | % | 1.67 | % | 0.94 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.56 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.31 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 1,819 | 1.34 | % | 2.11 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.14 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.01 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 1,226 | 2.81 | % | 3.23 | % | 3.42 | % | 3.04 | % | 3.94 | % | 2.86 | % | 2.69 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.72 | % | 2.58 | % | 1.83 | % | 1.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 1,584 | 2.01 | % | 2.08 | % | 1.60 | % | 2.16 | % | 2.16 | % | 2.28 | % | 2.52 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.54 | % | 2.15 | % | 1.56 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2,530 | 2.40 | % | 2.13 | % | 2.32 | % | 3.16 | % | 3.41 | % | 2.58 | % | 3.05 | % | 2.57 | % | 2.08 | % | 2.02 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 987 | 0.83 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.58 | % | 1.05 | % | 0.53 | % | 0.67 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.53 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.63 | % | 1.08 | % | 0.44 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver, CO | 884 | 1.67 | % | 5.13 | % | 4.43 | % | 4.38 | % | 4.71 | % | 3.27 | % | 3.78 | % | 3.00 | % | 2.05 | % | 1.90 | % | 1.59 | % | 3.39 | % | 3.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 1,828 | 2.00 | % | 1.69 | % | 2.09 | % | 2.14 | % | 2.69 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.61 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.48 | % | 2.96 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.30 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 660 | 1.62 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.74 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.60 | % | 0.94 | % | 0.87 | % | 0.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 5,447 | 3.75 | % | 3.19 | % | 3.65 | % | 4.53 | % | 4.78 | % | 4.39 | % | 5.13 | % | 3.90 | % | 3.97 | % | 4.30 | % | 4.99 | % | 5.48 | % | 6.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 1,557 | 0.41 | % | 0.67 | % | 0.26 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.69 | % | 0.66 | % | 0.87 | % | 0.81 | % | 0.88 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 933 | 0.84 | % | 2.00 | % | 3.26 | % | 2.26 | % | 2.01 | % | 4.33 | % | 4.51 | % | 1.46 | % | 0.75 | % | 1.05 | % | 1.52 | % | 1.26 | % | 2.03 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2,098 | 1.02 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.54 | % | 2.09 | % | 2.67 | % | 3.06 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.78 | % | 1.11 | % | 1.59 | % | 1.48 | % | 0.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 1,568 | 2.32 | % | 2.78 | % | 2.38 | % | 3.24 | % | 2.67 | % | 4.22 | % | 2.90 | % | 2.32 | % | 1.70 | % | 1.57 | % | 2.26 | % | 2.45 | % | 2.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2,580 | 0.78 | % | 0.88 | % | 0.63 | % | 0.72 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.72 | % | 0.67 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.67 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 1,438 | 0.65 | % | 0.66 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.94 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 3,352 | 2.58 | % | 2.74 | % | 4.16 | % | 6.25 | % | 3.66 | % | 5.16 | % | 6.08 | % | 4.02 | % | 2.63 | % | 3.01 | % | 2.30 | % | 3.20 | % | 4.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2,820 | 0.13 | % | 0.69 | % | 1.26 | % | 0.53 | % | 1.47 | % | 2.11 | % | 2.76 | % | 1.96 | % | 3.07 | % | 5.84 | % | 5.95 | % | 4.52 | % | 3.85 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2,192 | 0.33 | % | 1.68 | % | 1.96 | % | 2.24 | % | 2.33 | % | 3.18 | % | 2.37 | % | 3.49 | % | 9.32 | % | 9.65 | % | 14.75 | % | 8.12 | % | 8.31 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 1,156 | 2.10 | % | 6.11 | % | 2.01 | % | 3.57 | % | 4.78 | % | 4.72 | % | 5.73 | % | 3.51 | % | 2.71 | % | 4.87 | % | 2.05 | % | 2.74 | % | 6.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 444 | 14.18 | % | 19.56 | % | 11.12 | % | 17.64 | % | 19.27 | % | 14.60 | % | 15.56 | % | 4.15 | % | 3.23 | % | 1.57 | % | 2.99 | % | 5.02 | % | 3.31 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 841 | 0.33 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.03 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.04 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.06 | % | 0.44 | % | 1.25 | % | 2.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 168 | 0.31 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.03 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.16 | % | 0.06 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.11 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.06 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2,302 | 5.56 | % | 1.96 | % | 1.18 | % | 2.54 | % | 3.33 | % | 2.89 | % | 2.07 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.46 | % | 1.93 | % | 2.03 | % | 1.99 | % | 3.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 820 | 3.64 | % | 3.49 | % | 2.69 | % | 1.84 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.98 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.79 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.45 | % | 2.00 | % | 2.41 | % | 2.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 914 | 2.66 | % | 2.51 | % | 2.02 | % | 1.95 | % | 2.26 | % | 2.33 | % | 2.05 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.72 | % | 2.50 | % | 2.16 | % | 1.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland, OR | 1,365 | 1.82 | % | 2.06 | % | 2.98 | % | 3.88 | % | 2.24 | % | 2.03 | % | 1.92 | % | 1.64 | % | 2.25 | % | 4.59 | % | 1.95 | % | 1.98 | % | 2.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 3,463 | 5.86 | % | 6.80 | % | 5.95 | % | 7.74 | % | 7.23 | % | 7.97 | % | 8.55 | % | 4.31 | % | 4.22 | % | 6.11 | % | 9.01 | % | 6.19 | % | 4.71 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 1,807 | 2.74 | % | 2.09 | % | 6.16 | % | 3.70 | % | 3.49 | % | 2.79 | % | 4.04 | % | 2.74 | % | 6.03 | % | 6.44 | % | 5.34 | % | 6.37 | % | 5.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 914 | 1.98 | % | 2.32 | % | 4.47 | % | 3.57 | % | 2.62 | % | 3.17 | % | 3.50 | % | 2.93 | % | 1.57 | % | 3.13 | % | 2.13 | % | 1.75 | % | 2.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 1,588 | 0.40 | % | 0.68 | % | 0.76 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.76 | % | 0.78 | % | 1.38 | % | 0.73 | % | 0.46 | % | 0.44 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.57 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 1,074 | 3.94 | % | 2.77 | % | 2.48 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.19 | % | 0.67 | % | 1.77 | % | 1.93 | % | 1.03 | % | 3.44 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 1,775 | 3.37 | % | 2.83 | % | 2.23 | % | 1.93 | % | 0.77 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.22 | % | 0.74 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.71 | % | 1.01 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2,873 | 0.60 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.25 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.16 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.46 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.55 | % | 1.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ventura County | 119 | 0.48 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.88 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.33 | % | 0.54 | % | 1.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 1,868 | 0.48 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.46 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.69 | % | 0.97 | % | 1.93 | % | 2.07 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 61,495 | 1.71 | % | 1.86 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.95 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.85 | % | 2.08 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.74 | % | 1.77 | % | 1.73 | % | 1.97 | % |
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2002 | 90.53 | % | 91.37 | % | 91.65 | % | 90.87 | % | 89.55 | % | 89.43 | % | 87.41 | % | 86.75 | % | 86.55 | % | 86.34 | % | 90.15 | % | 92.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2003 | 92.55 | % | 92.08 | % | 92.13 | % | 91.53 | % | 90.90 | % | 89.94 | % | 91.08 | % | 90.62 | % | 89.74 | % | 90.49 | % | 90.25 | % | 90.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2004 | 90.36 | % | 90.67 | % | 90.13 | % | 90.79 | % | 92.71 | % | 93.50 | % | 93.10 | % | 92.55 | % | 92.90 | % | 91.37 | % | 90.62 | % | 91.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2005 | 91.70 | % | 92.76 | % | 92.74 | % | 92.86 | % | 93.22 | % | 91.47 | % | 90.57 | % | 91.49 | % | 91.99 | % | 94.28 | % | 95.39 | % | 96.21 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2006 | 95.39 | % | 95.69 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.30 | % | 95.83 | % | 94.74 | % | 95.42 | % | 95.09 | % | 94.16 | % | 94.06 | % | 95.50 | % | 96.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2007 | 95.13 | % | 94.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2002 | 85.24 | % | 86.32 | % | 86.81 | % | 86.06 | % | 89.11 | % | 88.69 | % | 92.80 | % | 92.45 | % | 89.25 | % | 86.54 | % | 83.87 | % | 82.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2003 | 80.57 | % | 80.44 | % | 81.43 | % | 84.91 | % | 85.62 | % | 82.66 | % | 82.42 | % | 84.61 | % | 85.24 | % | 86.20 | % | 89.56 | % | 91.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2004 | 92.01 | % | 90.79 | % | 90.95 | % | 92.33 | % | 91.67 | % | 91.60 | % | 94.07 | % | 96.53 | % | 96.04 | % | 94.13 | % | 94.41 | % | 94.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2005 | 94.71 | % | 95.50 | % | 94.62 | % | 94.74 | % | 94.62 | % | 94.78 | % | 95.61 | % | 96.86 | % | 96.89 | % | 96.61 | % | 96.33 | % | 96.21 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2006 | 95.19 | % | 95.95 | % | 96.39 | % | 96.42 | % | 96.44 | % | 96.74 | % | 96.63 | % | 97.04 | % | 97.81 | % | 96.26 | % | 96.14 | % | 95.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2007 | 97.07 | % | 97.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2002 | 97.38 | % | 96.57 | % | 96.20 | % | 96.36 | % | 96.71 | % | 95.97 | % | 95.32 | % | 94.97 | % | 94.64 | % | 95.60 | % | 96.34 | % | 95.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2003 | 96.01 | % | 96.23 | % | 96.19 | % | 95.45 | % | 95.78 | % | 95.76 | % | 95.74 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.32 | % | 95.71 | % | 96.07 | % | 95.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2004 | 96.60 | % | 97.01 | % | 96.63 | % | 97.25 | % | 96.67 | % | 96.48 | % | 96.39 | % | 95.97 | % | 97.12 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.72 | % | 97.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2005 | 96.16 | % | 95.88 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.27 | % | 95.35 | % | 96.03 | % | 96.12 | % | 96.36 | % | 96.86 | % | 97.06 | % | 97.43 | % | 96.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2006 | 95.66 | % | 95.57 | % | 96.78 | % | 96.85 | % | 96.88 | % | 97.35 | % | 96.21 | % | 94.99 | % | 95.19 | % | 95.64 | % | 96.04 | % | 95.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2007 | 95.62 | % | 95.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2002 | 89.41 | % | 89.07 | % | 86.53 | % | 85.97 | % | 88.51 | % | 89.89 | % | 91.22 | % | 92.51 | % | 91.95 | % | 92.42 | % | 96.25 | % | 96.74 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2003 | 96.86 | % | 95.68 | % | 95.30 | % | 95.88 | % | 96.16 | % | 96.21 | % | 95.35 | % | 94.31 | % | 92.93 | % | 91.82 | % | 91.34 | % | 91.62 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2004 | 90.93 | % | 92.16 | % | 91.75 | % | 91.23 | % | 91.38 | % | 90.25 | % | 91.03 | % | 93.12 | % | 92.81 | % | 92.88 | % | 93.05 | % | 92.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2005 | 94.31 | % | 96.29 | % | 96.50 | % | 94.82 | % | 93.76 | % | 93.41 | % | 94.13 | % | 93.98 | % | 93.63 | % | 93.52 | % | 93.95 | % | 94.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2006 | 93.95 | % | 93.89 | % | 93.73 | % | 93.28 | % | 92.81 | % | 92.87 | % | 93.08 | % | 94.59 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.72 | % | 95.19 | % | 94.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2007 | 94.43 | % | 94.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2002 | 94.23 | % | 94.38 | % | 94.35 | % | 94.31 | % | 94.93 | % | 93.72 | % | 93.88 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.37 | % | 95.38 | % | 96.32 | % | 95.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2003 | 94.12 | % | 93.69 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.55 | % | 93.29 | % | 92.09 | % | 92.89 | % | 94.43 | % | 93.83 | % | 91.87 | % | 90.88 | % | 90.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2004 | 91.30 | % | 91.62 | % | 92.12 | % | 92.99 | % | 94.49 | % | 94.14 | % | 93.70 | % | 94.78 | % | 92.80 | % | 92.31 | % | 92.15 | % | 92.41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2005 | 93.11 | % | 94.00 | % | 94.26 | % | 95.66 | % | 96.04 | % | 96.05 | % | 96.46 | % | 97.16 | % | 96.29 | % | 95.24 | % | 94.67 | % | 94.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2006 | 94.41 | % | 94.03 | % | 94.07 | % | 93.89 | % | 95.56 | % | 94.84 | % | 95.11 | % | 94.59 | % | 95.82 | % | 94.89 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.52 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2007 | 93.43 | % | 94.22 | % |
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2002 | 93.87 | % | 94.77 | % | 95.60 | % | 95.30 | % | 95.32 | % | 94.10 | % | 92.70 | % | 93.36 | % | 93.21 | % | 93.04 | % | 93.06 | % | 93.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2003 | 93.74 | % | 93.46 | % | 92.83 | % | 93.17 | % | 93.56 | % | 93.56 | % | 93.85 | % | 94.51 | % | 95.17 | % | 94.27 | % | 92.96 | % | 91.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2004 | 90.64 | % | 90.86 | % | 92.51 | % | 92.38 | % | 91.86 | % | 92.05 | % | 91.38 | % | 92.10 | % | 92.69 | % | 91.52 | % | 91.56 | % | 92.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2005 | 93.45 | % | 93.69 | % | 93.25 | % | 91.98 | % | 91.60 | % | 90.72 | % | 90.42 | % | 91.71 | % | 92.91 | % | 93.49 | % | 93.72 | % | 94.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2006 | 94.17 | % | 94.44 | % | 94.55 | % | 93.61 | % | 93.70 | % | 93.76 | % | 92.12 | % | 92.21 | % | 93.81 | % | 92.82 | % | 93.16 | % | 93.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2007 | 93.82 | % | 94.93 | % | �� | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2002 | 94.52 | % | 94.37 | % | 93.81 | % | 93.78 | % | 93.91 | % | 93.36 | % | 93.41 | % | 92.78 | % | 91.94 | % | 93.12 | % | 93.63 | % | 94.41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2003 | 95.48 | % | 95.78 | % | 95.50 | % | 95.42 | % | 95.37 | % | 95.08 | % | 95.28 | % | 95.50 | % | 94.93 | % | 94.51 | % | 94.34 | % | 95.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2004 | 96.17 | % | 95.91 | % | 96.07 | % | 95.88 | % | 96.17 | % | 96.20 | % | 96.67 | % | 95.88 | % | 95.59 | % | 95.66 | % | 95.70 | % | 96.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2005 | 96.62 | % | 96.19 | % | 95.61 | % | 94.81 | % | 94.78 | % | 95.66 | % | 96.22 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.98 | % | 97.34 | % | 96.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2006 | 96.39 | % | 96.04 | % | 95.98 | % | 95.19 | % | 96.14 | % | 96.54 | % | 96.29 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.46 | % | 94.97 | % | 94.61 | % | 95.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2007 | 94.86 | % | 95.61 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2002 | 82.96 | % | 82.37 | % | 82.19 | % | 83.20 | % | 88.01 | % | 88.01 | % | 85.78 | % | 84.18 | % | 83.52 | % | 82.88 | % | 83.54 | % | 84.21 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2003 | 84.41 | % | 85.83 | % | 86.83 | % | 88.11 | % | 88.78 | % | 90.68 | % | 91.32 | % | 90.94 | % | 90.63 | % | 89.47 | % | 89.91 | % | 89.40 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2004 | 91.81 | % | 93.23 | % | 93.70 | % | 93.36 | % | 92.69 | % | 92.62 | % | 93.53 | % | 94.73 | % | 93.98 | % | 92.33 | % | 92.30 | % | 92.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2005 | 92.33 | % | 92.32 | % | 91.73 | % | 91.11 | % | 90.57 | % | 90.88 | % | 91.17 | % | 92.14 | % | 93.24 | % | 92.36 | % | 90.87 | % | 89.35 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2006 | 89.32 | % | 88.26 | % | 89.14 | % | 90.70 | % | 90.93 | % | 90.64 | % | 91.71 | % | 94.03 | % | 95.96 | % | 94.99 | % | 94.43 | % | 92.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2007 | 92.35 | % | 92.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2002 | 94.92 | % | 94.69 | % | 95.30 | % | 94.74 | % | 95.04 | % | 94.57 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.33 | % | 93.41 | % | 94.74 | % | 95.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2003 | 94.84 | % | 94.61 | % | 94.87 | % | 94.46 | % | 94.92 | % | 94.87 | % | 93.90 | % | 94.40 | % | 93.69 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.46 | % | 93.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2004 | 93.76 | % | 94.08 | % | 93.19 | % | 92.82 | % | 91.96 | % | 91.71 | % | 92.96 | % | 93.01 | % | 93.45 | % | 93.52 | % | 93.02 | % | 94.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2005 | 94.35 | % | 94.21 | % | 94.36 | % | 93.12 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.56 | % | 94.35 | % | 96.33 | % | 95.52 | % | 94.58 | % | 95.07 | % | 95.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2006 | 96.37 | % | 96.59 | % | 95.14 | % | 93.75 | % | 94.50 | % | 94.95 | % | 95.12 | % | 94.85 | % | 94.89 | % | 92.87 | % | 92.21 | % | 92.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2007 | 93.14 | % | 93.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2002 | 97.79 | % | 95.55 | % | 97.84 | % | 98.17 | % | 99.04 | % | 98.08 | % | 97.21 | % | 98.32 | % | 97.36 | % | 99.33 | % | 99.64 | % | 99.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2003 | 95.63 | % | 95.09 | % | 93.75 | % | 93.39 | % | 93.42 | % | 93.02 | % | 92.77 | % | 94.48 | % | 95.87 | % | 96.43 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2004 | 96.07 | % | 96.15 | % | 95.48 | % | 96.47 | % | 95.76 | % | 96.21 | % | 94.96 | % | 95.20 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.54 | % | 95.41 | % | 94.30 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2005 | 92.65 | % | 91.13 | % | 91.16 | % | 92.40 | % | 93.26 | % | 92.07 | % | 90.55 | % | 91.11 | % | 78.00 | % | 64.79 | % | 63.98 | % | 65.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2006 | 66.79 | % | 70.34 | % | 73.56 | % | 75.98 | % | 79.11 | % | 81.16 | % | 83.25 | % | 85.96 | % | 87.23 | % | 87.68 | % | 89.41 | % | 87.77 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2007 | 85.63 | % | 87.45 | % |
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2002 | 94.85 | % | 95.31 | % | 95.44 | % | 96.07 | % | 95.92 | % | 95.27 | % | 94.89 | % | 93.40 | % | 91.57 | % | 91.12 | % | 91.29 | % | 90.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2003 | 89.13 | % | 89.60 | % | 90.11 | % | 91.42 | % | 92.17 | % | 90.74 | % | 90.21 | % | 89.66 | % | 89.30 | % | 90.37 | % | 90.28 | % | 89.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2004 | 90.35 | % | 90.23 | % | 90.79 | % | 91.26 | % | 91.59 | % | 90.98 | % | 91.76 | % | 91.24 | % | 90.84 | % | 90.81 | % | 90.67 | % | 90.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2005 | 91.72 | % | 92.42 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.36 | % | 93.23 | % | 93.11 | % | 93.27 | % | 95.09 | % | 94.91 | % | 95.24 | % | 95.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2006 | 95.07 | % | 95.35 | % | 95.27 | % | 94.51 | % | 94.39 | % | 94.58 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.63 | % | 94.20 | % | 93.83 | % | 93.39 | % | 92.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2007 | 92.50 | % | 93.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2002 | 93.71 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.49 | % | 95.10 | % | 93.86 | % | 94.45 | % | 95.29 | % | 95.20 | % | 95.26 | % | 96.52 | % | 96.69 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2003 | 96.85 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.31 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.09 | % | 96.46 | % | 95.45 | % | 95.98 | % | 95.94 | % | 95.90 | % | 95.33 | % | 94.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2004 | 94.57 | % | 93.47 | % | 93.71 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.52 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.90 | % | 93.39 | % | 93.07 | % | 91.08 | % | 92.01 | % | 93.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2005 | 95.37 | % | 96.02 | % | 96.54 | % | 96.50 | % | 95.85 | % | 95.49 | % | 95.72 | % | 94.95 | % | 95.10 | % | 93.88 | % | 95.31 | % | 95.12 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2006 | 94.94 | % | 94.45 | % | 94.04 | % | 94.47 | % | 94.59 | % | 94.60 | % | 94.35 | % | 95.02 | % | 94.79 | % | 93.50 | % | 92.64 | % | 92.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2007 | 91.52 | % | 91.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2002 | 96.58 | % | 96.99 | % | 94.62 | % | 92.15 | % | 90.66 | % | 91.46 | % | 91.14 | % | 93.67 | % | 97.47 | % | 98.86 | % | 98.73 | % | 98.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2003 | 98.86 | % | 99.53 | % | 98.73 | % | 98.48 | % | 97.78 | % | 95.73 | % | 95.95 | % | 94.94 | % | 93.04 | % | 92.53 | % | 92.72 | % | 94.30 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2004 | 93.80 | % | 95.41 | % | 95.89 | % | 95.82 | % | 95.89 | % | 96.99 | % | 95.70 | % | 91.14 | % | 91.27 | % | 95.25 | % | 94.28 | % | 92.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2005 | 90.89 | % | 91.02 | % | 92.25 | % | 93.06 | % | 94.62 | % | 94.37 | % | 93.13 | % | 93.97 | % | 94.07 | % | 95.34 | % | 95.81 | % | 94.98 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2006 | 94.94 | % | 93.54 | % | 93.03 | % | 94.73 | % | 93.99 | % | 92.35 | % | 89.87 | % | 92.59 | % | 94.91 | % | 95.26 | % | 94.79 | % | 95.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2007 | 93.57 | % | 93.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2002 | 96.38 | % | 96.04 | % | 96.84 | % | 96.34 | % | 96.74 | % | 97.48 | % | 95.89 | % | 95.39 | % | 95.64 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.27 | % | 95.33 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2003 | 95.08 | % | 95.68 | % | 96.52 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.02 | % | 95.99 | % | 95.90 | % | 96.45 | % | 96.53 | % | 95.63 | % | 95.96 | % | 95.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2004 | 96.41 | % | 95.72 | % | 96.06 | % | 96.13 | % | 96.89 | % | 96.96 | % | 97.77 | % | 97.40 | % | 97.11 | % | 96.32 | % | 96.22 | % | 96.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2005 | 96.56 | % | 96.47 | % | 96.87 | % | 97.19 | % | 96.90 | % | 97.55 | % | 96.78 | % | 97.35 | % | 97.13 | % | 96.15 | % | 96.99 | % | 96.98 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2006 | 97.38 | % | 97.41 | % | 96.11 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.66 | % | 95.42 | % | 96.27 | % | 96.82 | % | 96.23 | % | 95.99 | % | 96.14 | % | 95.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2007 | 96.05 | % | 96.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2002 | 92.16 | % | 91.46 | % | 91.53 | % | 92.54 | % | 91.76 | % | 91.69 | % | 90.80 | % | 91.57 | % | 92.47 | % | 94.01 | % | 92.67 | % | 92.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2003 | 93.14 | % | 92.98 | % | 91.75 | % | 93.12 | % | 93.67 | % | 93.90 | % | 94.11 | % | 93.73 | % | 92.66 | % | 91.74 | % | 90.38 | % | 90.67 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2004 | 91.08 | % | 90.00 | % | 90.13 | % | 93.70 | % | 93.99 | % | 94.48 | % | 94.01 | % | 94.64 | % | 95.19 | % | 93.95 | % | 91.27 | % | 87.88 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2005 | 88.95 | % | 90.00 | % | 90.66 | % | 93.57 | % | 93.38 | % | 92.56 | % | 93.08 | % | 93.72 | % | 93.81 | % | 92.73 | % | 90.95 | % | 88.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2006 | 88.09 | % | 88.44 | % | 88.39 | % | 88.30 | % | 89.71 | % | 89.54 | % | 90.72 | % | 91.72 | % | 92.12 | % | 92.24 | % | 90.54 | % | 86.97 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2007 | 87.20 | % | 89.54 | % |
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2002 | 94.16 | % | 93.77 | % | 93.02 | % | 93.03 | % | 92.64 | % | 91.39 | % | 91.23 | % | 90.73 | % | 91.43 | % | 91.55 | % | 92.43 | % | 93.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2003 | 93.70 | % | 93.45 | % | 92.95 | % | 93.77 | % | 94.19 | % | 94.19 | % | 92.45 | % | 92.40 | % | 92.53 | % | 92.11 | % | 91.63 | % | 91.67 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2004 | 92.52 | % | 93.36 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.49 | % | 94.93 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.80 | % | 95.37 | % | 94.95 | % | 93.99 | % | 93.86 | % | 94.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2005 | 94.83 | % | 95.44 | % | 95.54 | % | 95.21 | % | 94.82 | % | 94.92 | % | 94.23 | % | 94.84 | % | 95.61 | % | 94.96 | % | 95.24 | % | 94.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2006 | 94.61 | % | 95.07 | % | 95.50 | % | 95.34 | % | 95.38 | % | 94.83 | % | 94.27 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.19 | % | 95.17 | % | 95.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2007 | 94.89 | % | 95.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2002 | 94.66 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.61 | % | 97.57 | % | 98.37 | % | 98.66 | % | 98.41 | % | 98.28 | % | 97.83 | % | 97.37 | % | 96.82 | % | 97.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2003 | 96.08 | % | 94.84 | % | 94.66 | % | 94.85 | % | 95.43 | % | 95.79 | % | 95.98 | % | 96.56 | % | 97.67 | % | 97.83 | % | 97.88 | % | 97.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2004 | 96.50 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.70 | % | 97.08 | % | 96.30 | % | 96.55 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.51 | % | 95.74 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2005 | 95.12 | % | 95.48 | % | 94.91 | % | 94.07 | % | 95.51 | % | 96.36 | % | 95.55 | % | 95.76 | % | 95.84 | % | 95.69 | % | 95.22 | % | 94.21 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2006 | 95.02 | % | 95.31 | % | 96.21 | % | 95.62 | % | 96.29 | % | 95.65 | % | 95.11 | % | 96.61 | % | 95.43 | % | 94.25 | % | 94.48 | % | 94.80 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2007 | 94.04 | % | 93.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2003 | 94.15 | % | 95.47 | % | 95.61 | % | 96.05 | % | 95.63 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2004 | 93.89 | % | 93.18 | % | 93.24 | % | 93.82 | % | 93.24 | % | 92.63 | % | 93.15 | % | 93.03 | % | 94.56 | % | 95.22 | % | 94.81 | % | 94.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2005 | 92.97 | % | 91.97 | % | 92.44 | % | 94.08 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.66 | % | 93.43 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.65 | % | 93.99 | % | 93.89 | % | 94.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2006 | 94.83 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.11 | % | 94.62 | % | 95.08 | % | 94.35 | % | 94.29 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.92 | % | 95.39 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2007 | 94.89 | % | 94.31 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2002 | 90.06 | % | 90.87 | % | 91.19 | % | 92.51 | % | 93.18 | % | 92.54 | % | 92.60 | % | 92.02 | % | 91.18 | % | 91.07 | % | 91.81 | % | 92.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2003 | 93.16 | % | 92.73 | % | 92.82 | % | 93.60 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.13 | % | 94.10 | % | 93.95 | % | 92.80 | % | 92.57 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.03 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2004 | 92.51 | % | 92.69 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.93 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.80 | % | 93.94 | % | 95.05 | % | 96.92 | % | 97.26 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2005 | 95.86 | % | 95.94 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.63 | % | 95.73 | % | 94.93 | % | 95.87 | % | 96.51 | % | 96.65 | % | 95.72 | % | 95.58 | % | 95.56 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2006 | 95.60 | % | 95.57 | % | 95.65 | % | 95.58 | % | 95.16 | % | 94.30 | % | 93.89 | % | 93.77 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.30 | % | 93.89 | % | 92.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2007 | 91.64 | % | 91.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2002 | 93.93 | % | 95.14 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.07 | % | 93.60 | % | 92.84 | % | 93.78 | % | 93.19 | % | 92.77 | % | 93.32 | % | 94.99 | % | 95.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2003 | 95.66 | % | 95.77 | % | 95.64 | % | 94.97 | % | 94.22 | % | 92.79 | % | 92.55 | % | 94.15 | % | 94.12 | % | 93.84 | % | 93.21 | % | 92.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2004 | 91.97 | % | 94.05 | % | 95.14 | % | 94.21 | % | 94.10 | % | 93.07 | % | 94.13 | % | 95.10 | % | 96.69 | % | 97.16 | % | 97.71 | % | 97.75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2005 | 97.44 | % | 96.68 | % | 96.68 | % | 97.07 | % | 96.64 | % | 95.35 | % | 95.19 | % | 95.91 | % | 97.57 | % | 97.60 | % | 97.14 | % | 96.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2006 | 96.34 | % | 96.38 | % | 96.74 | % | 96.45 | % | 95.79 | % | 94.72 | % | 93.48 | % | 94.11 | % | 93.40 | % | 93.27 | % | 92.74 | % | 92.71 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2007 | 92.11 | % | 91.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 1999 | 97.47 | % | 97.40 | % | 96.57 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.28 | % | 95.61 | % | 95.13 | % | 96.18 | % | 97.64 | % | 96.86 | % | 95.57 | % | 94.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2000 | 93.62 | % | 94.97 | % | 95.22 | % | 95.61 | % | 97.25 | % | 97.88 | % | 97.38 | % | 97.65 | % | 97.21 | % | 96.35 | % | 96.04 | % | 93.73 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2001 | 94.24 | % | 95.35 | % | 96.22 | % | 97.04 | % | 97.96 | % | 97.19 | % | 97.06 | % | 95.80 | % | 97.08 | % | 97.32 | % | 97.47 | % | 97.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2002 | 97.27 | % | 96.52 | % | 97.36 | % | 97.37 | % | 97.88 | % | 97.17 | % | 97.32 | % | 97.69 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.63 | % | 96.84 | % | 96.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2003 | 96.26 | % | 96.39 | % | 96.78 | % | 95.87 | % | 95.96 | % | 95.22 | % | 93.74 | % | 94.90 | % | 94.25 | % | 92.91 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2004 | 92.82 | % | 92.97 | % | 92.65 | % | 94.19 | % | 95.52 | % | 95.29 | % | 94.72 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.81 | % | 93.45 | % | 94.08 | % | 93.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2005 | 93.51 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.13 | % | 95.20 | % | 96.17 | % | 96.35 | % | 95.72 | % | 95.14 | % | 93.86 | % | 93.03 | % | 95.16 | % | 95.26 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2006 | 94.20 | % | 94.62 | % | 94.90 | % | 94.16 | % | 94.71 | % | 93.45 | % | 94.16 | % | 94.48 | % | 95.87 | % | 94.03 | % | 93.72 | % | 91.44 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2007 | 90.19 | % | 91.45 | % |
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2002 | 93.62 | % | 93.67 | % | 94.11 | % | 94.48 | % | 94.87 | % | 93.49 | % | 93.67 | % | 93.42 | % | 94.30 | % | 95.84 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2003 | 94.68 | % | 95.39 | % | 94.55 | % | 95.39 | % | 95.27 | % | 92.72 | % | 91.29 | % | 91.38 | % | 91.89 | % | 92.51 | % | 92.43 | % | 92.26 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2004 | 94.41 | % | 92.40 | % | 93.36 | % | 95.45 | % | 94.26 | % | 92.85 | % | 92.48 | % | 95.05 | % | 93.51 | % | 93.36 | % | 94.37 | % | 95.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2005 | 94.23 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.07 | % | 93.75 | % | 93.15 | % | 92.40 | % | 92.48 | % | 91.95 | % | 93.32 | % | 91.25 | % | 91.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2006 | 91.44 | % | 91.95 | % | 93.07 | % | 91.61 | % | 91.22 | % | 89.64 | % | 90.82 | % | 93.33 | % | 92.62 | % | 90.60 | % | 90.68 | % | 89.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2007 | 90.79 | % | 90.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2002 | 93.75 | % | 95.14 | % | 94.90 | % | 95.65 | % | 97.32 | % | 97.20 | % | 96.15 | % | 95.81 | % | 94.93 | % | 94.03 | % | 93.98 | % | 93.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2003 | 93.90 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.60 | % | 91.47 | % | 93.61 | % | 95.06 | % | 96.33 | % | 96.92 | % | 96.50 | % | 96.24 | % | 96.17 | % | 95.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2004 | 95.87 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.35 | % | 96.87 | % | 96.24 | % | 95.55 | % | 96.02 | % | 95.95 | % | 95.88 | % | 95.88 | % | 95.19 | % | 94.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2005 | 94.00 | % | 94.49 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.14 | % | 93.67 | % | 92.39 | % | 92.39 | % | 93.49 | % | 93.61 | % | 94.61 | % | 95.39 | % | 94.51 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2006 | 93.60 | % | 95.78 | % | 95.96 | % | 96.40 | % | 96.67 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.05 | % | 95.74 | % | 95.18 | % | 94.95 | % | 94.24 | % | 93.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2007 | 92.94 | % | 92.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2002 | 88.02 | % | 88.90 | % | 90.23 | % | 92.28 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.77 | % | 91.00 | % | 90.57 | % | 89.74 | % | 88.31 | % | 87.95 | % | 88.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2003 | 88.98 | % | 90.21 | % | 90.82 | % | 90.96 | % | 91.18 | % | 90.51 | % | 90.34 | % | 89.72 | % | 90.82 | % | 91.29 | % | 92.38 | % | 92.66 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2004 | 93.51 | % | 95.08 | % | 95.99 | % | 95.71 | % | 94.86 | % | 94.33 | % | 93.81 | % | 94.42 | % | 93.56 | % | 92.92 | % | 93.51 | % | 94.96 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2005 | 94.64 | % | 95.18 | % | 95.93 | % | 95.02 | % | 94.52 | % | 94.94 | % | 94.24 | % | 94.69 | % | 95.74 | % | 94.66 | % | 95.27 | % | 94.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2006 | 97.02 | % | 98.21 | % | 98.36 | % | 97.47 | % | 97.50 | % | 97.77 | % | 97.02 | % | 97.38 | % | 97.62 | % | 97.02 | % | 97.26 | % | 97.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2007 | 96.47 | % | 97.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2002 | 89.55 | % | 90.48 | % | 90.67 | % | 89.64 | % | 91.83 | % | 91.46 | % | 94.15 | % | 93.98 | % | 92.12 | % | 90.34 | % | 88.51 | % | 87.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2003 | 86.19 | % | 86.04 | % | 86.95 | % | 89.19 | % | 89.43 | % | 87.32 | % | 87.27 | % | 88.81 | % | 89.34 | % | 89.94 | % | 92.25 | % | 93.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2004 | 95.92 | % | 95.18 | % | 95.32 | % | 95.77 | % | 94.85 | % | 95.10 | % | 95.30 | % | 95.81 | % | 95.57 | % | 95.30 | % | 94.90 | % | 94.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2005 | 94.49 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.90 | % | 95.14 | % | 94.90 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.75 | % | 95.20 | % | 95.80 | % | 95.52 | % | 95.83 | % | 94.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2006 | 95.53 | % | 95.36 | % | 95.82 | % | 95.32 | % | 94.50 | % | 95.24 | % | 96.31 | % | 96.39 | % | 95.44 | % | 95.75 | % | 96.86 | % | 96.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2007 | 96.44 | % | 96.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2002 | 97.34 | % | 96.68 | % | 96.68 | % | 96.29 | % | 95.43 | % | 96.31 | % | 97.00 | % | 97.01 | % | 97.10 | % | 97.17 | % | 96.25 | % | 95.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2003 | 95.37 | % | 94.82 | % | 95.64 | % | 95.51 | % | 94.60 | % | 95.76 | % | 95.29 | % | 95.27 | % | 94.88 | % | 94.12 | % | 94.60 | % | 92.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2004 | 90.37 | % | 91.98 | % | 93.02 | % | 91.78 | % | 91.10 | % | 91.86 | % | 92.90 | % | 93.54 | % | 94.20 | % | 93.72 | % | 92.90 | % | 93.66 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2005 | 91.98 | % | 91.65 | % | 92.71 | % | 92.90 | % | 94.21 | % | 94.80 | % | 93.57 | % | 94.83 | % | 95.21 | % | 94.15 | % | 94.27 | % | 93.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2006 | 93.10 | % | 94.18 | % | 95.37 | % | 97.13 | % | 97.63 | % | 97.77 | % | 97.50 | % | 95.73 | % | 94.73 | % | 96.01 | % | 95.63 | % | 94.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2007 | 93.89 | % | 93.81 | % |
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2002 | 93.45 | % | 93.75 | % | 94.23 | % | 93.48 | % | 93.17 | % | 92.61 | % | 92.17 | % | 92.81 | % | 94.37 | % | 94.47 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2003 | 91.50 | % | 91.68 | % | 92.14 | % | 92.50 | % | 92.46 | % | 92.07 | % | 91.94 | % | 91.58 | % | 90.46 | % | 90.33 | % | 89.45 | % | 88.33 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2004 | 92.03 | % | 91.63 | % | 92.87 | % | 93.01 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.82 | % | 91.41 | % | 91.36 | % | 92.10 | % | 93.28 | % | 93.55 | % | 93.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2005 | 92.69 | % | 93.55 | % | 94.39 | % | 94.11 | % | 94.57 | % | 94.39 | % | 95.58 | % | 95.55 | % | 95.25 | % | 94.70 | % | 95.06 | % | 95.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2006 | 96.08 | % | 97.24 | % | 96.91 | % | 96.09 | % | 95.84 | % | 95.84 | % | 95.92 | % | 96.15 | % | 96.39 | % | 95.95 | % | 94.77 | % | 94.78 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2007 | 95.09 | % | 94.78 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2002 | 92.11 | % | 91.68 | % | 91.73 | % | 90.46 | % | 89.79 | % | 90.29 | % | 90.54 | % | 91.65 | % | 90.74 | % | 94.08 | % | 95.07 | % | 94.22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2003 | 92.72 | % | 91.62 | % | 91.60 | % | 90.26 | % | 90.92 | % | 88.96 | % | 87.71 | % | 88.78 | % | 88.86 | % | 87.22 | % | 88.51 | % | 90.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2004 | 92.15 | % | 91.35 | % | 90.79 | % | 91.57 | % | 90.52 | % | 91.30 | % | 91.39 | % | 90.37 | % | 92.92 | % | 94.34 | % | 93.78 | % | 93.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2005 | 93.58 | % | 94.25 | % | 93.41 | % | 93.30 | % | 92.06 | % | 93.00 | % | 92.98 | % | 93.72 | % | 93.41 | % | 92.93 | % | 93.79 | % | 93.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2006 | 95.19 | % | 94.38 | % | 93.81 | % | 94.40 | % | 94.43 | % | 94.05 | % | 94.34 | % | 95.28 | % | 94.18 | % | 92.82 | % | 95.47 | % | 95.35 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2007 | 94.75 | % | 94.05 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2002 | 86.56 | % | 86.62 | % | 87.03 | % | 87.29 | % | 88.24 | % | 87.76 | % | 88.68 | % | 90.19 | % | 91.05 | % | 92.90 | % | 94.36 | % | 94.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2003 | 92.78 | % | 92.75 | % | 93.43 | % | 94.22 | % | 94.49 | % | 92.72 | % | 91.73 | % | 92.19 | % | 93.27 | % | 93.25 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2004 | 93.39 | % | 92.67 | % | 92.45 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.28 | % | 92.78 | % | 93.25 | % | 93.27 | % | 93.34 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.48 | % | 94.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2005 | 94.16 | % | 93.76 | % | 94.10 | % | 93.95 | % | 94.03 | % | 93.04 | % | 92.81 | % | 93.23 | % | 93.15 | % | 93.54 | % | 93.31 | % | 93.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2006 | 93.45 | % | 93.49 | % | 94.10 | % | 94.85 | % | 94.98 | % | 93.53 | % | 93.53 | % | 94.18 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.10 | % | 93.18 | % | 92.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2007 | 93.28 | % | 93.60 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2002 | 96.14 | % | 95.60 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.62 | % | 94.39 | % | 93.61 | % | 91.80 | % | 92.89 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.69 | % | 94.50 | % | 95.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2003 | 95.13 | % | 95.85 | % | 96.47 | % | 95.62 | % | 95.46 | % | 94.31 | % | 93.41 | % | 92.90 | % | 92.16 | % | 92.88 | % | 94.99 | % | 93.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2004 | 93.16 | % | 94.82 | % | 94.42 | % | 95.19 | % | 94.15 | % | 94.00 | % | 94.38 | % | 94.39 | % | 93.84 | % | 93.79 | % | 94.08 | % | 95.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2005 | 94.74 | % | 94.60 | % | 95.58 | % | 95.44 | % | 95.34 | % | 96.36 | % | 96.18 | % | 96.63 | % | 95.66 | % | 96.47 | % | 97.38 | % | 96.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2006 | 96.65 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.50 | % | 96.50 | % | 96.94 | % | 96.58 | % | 96.51 | % | 95.67 | % | 94.89 | % | 95.20 | % | 94.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2007 | 94.75 | % | 95.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2002 | 92.65 | % | 92.37 | % | 92.40 | % | 94.38 | % | 95.60 | % | 93.90 | % | 93.94 | % | 94.99 | % | 95.82 | % | 95.82 | % | 93.98 | % | 93.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2003 | 92.12 | % | 92.94 | % | 94.61 | % | 94.95 | % | 94.64 | % | 91.60 | % | 91.20 | % | 92.12 | % | 92.61 | % | 92.89 | % | 92.94 | % | 91.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2004 | 90.61 | % | 91.68 | % | 91.58 | % | 92.84 | % | 94.50 | % | 93.35 | % | 93.50 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.09 | % | 91.99 | % | 92.93 | % | 92.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2005 | 91.68 | % | 91.55 | % | 91.00 | % | 92.04 | % | 91.82 | % | 92.23 | % | 91.41 | % | 92.89 | % | 91.71 | % | 90.81 | % | 91.47 | % | 91.96 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2006 | 92.78 | % | 91.66 | % | 91.58 | % | 93.27 | % | 93.79 | % | 92.53 | % | 92.26 | % | 92.21 | % | 91.14 | % | 92.29 | % | 94.16 | % | 94.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2007 | 94.35 | % | 94.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2002 | 96.74 | % | 98.78 | % | 99.59 | % | 99.46 | % | 99.32 | % | 99.73 | % | 99.35 | % | 99.59 | % | 99.05 | % | 99.67 | % | 95.24 | % | 94.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2003 | 93.15 | % | 91.85 | % | 91.98 | % | 95.22 | % | 95.79 | % | 93.75 | % | 96.41 | % | 98.23 | % | 96.88 | % | 95.11 | % | 91.85 | % | 90.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2004 | 90.65 | % | 93.07 | % | 96.06 | % | 96.30 | % | 96.47 | % | 96.88 | % | 95.69 | % | 93.42 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.63 | % | 94.36 | % | 94.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2005 | 93.65 | % | 93.26 | % | 93.23 | % | 94.25 | % | 95.50 | % | 94.89 | % | 95.15 | % | 94.86 | % | 94.74 | % | 94.04 | % | 94.69 | % | 94.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2006 | 95.11 | % | 95.21 | % | 93.39 | % | 93.78 | % | 94.12 | % | 93.66 | % | 93.43 | % | 94.31 | % | 94.22 | % | 94.76 | % | 95.17 | % | 94.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2007 | 95.37 | % | 95.23 | % |
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2002 | 92.75 | % | 93.07 | % | 93.76 | % | 94.38 | % | 95.36 | % | 89.10 | % | 91.46 | % | 90.94 | % | 89.21 | % | 89.27 | % | 90.30 | % | 90.52 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2003 | 91.11 | % | 90.32 | % | 91.92 | % | 92.11 | % | 92.87 | % | 93.57 | % | 93.26 | % | 92.78 | % | 92.37 | % | 93.46 | % | 92.44 | % | 93.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2004 | 94.08 | % | 93.62 | % | 92.95 | % | 94.58 | % | 94.40 | % | 93.40 | % | 92.48 | % | 91.62 | % | 92.85 | % | 92.70 | % | 91.72 | % | 91.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2005 | 92.24 | % | 92.43 | % | 95.05 | % | 95.22 | % | 93.75 | % | 93.42 | % | 92.87 | % | 92.72 | % | 91.92 | % | 92.22 | % | 94.30 | % | 95.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2006 | 94.41 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.78 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.63 | % | 96.35 | % | 94.97 | % | 95.63 | % | 96.65 | % | 94.97 | % | 95.97 | % | 96.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2007 | 94.71 | % | 93.78 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2002 | 95.96 | % | 97.14 | % | 96.99 | % | 98.04 | % | 98.75 | % | 97.37 | % | 96.41 | % | 97.19 | % | 97.53 | % | 97.45 | % | 96.07 | % | 97.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2003 | 97.00 | % | 96.05 | % | 95.61 | % | 95.27 | % | 95.77 | % | 95.23 | % | 94.86 | % | 95.41 | % | 93.62 | % | 94.88 | % | 96.22 | % | 96.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2004 | 96.80 | % | 95.99 | % | 95.61 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.18 | % | 95.87 | % | 96.04 | % | 96.15 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.07 | % | 96.18 | % | 96.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2005 | 95.53 | % | 96.31 | % | 96.17 | % | 96.24 | % | 95.72 | % | 96.27 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.93 | % | 96.18 | % | 97.03 | % | 97.65 | % | 97.60 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2006 | 97.19 | % | 96.65 | % | 96.79 | % | 96.69 | % | 97.19 | % | 97.35 | % | 96.97 | % | 97.50 | % | 96.48 | % | 95.93 | % | 96.54 | % | 96.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2007 | 97.09 | % | 96.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2002 | 92.43 | % | 93.02 | % | 92.29 | % | 92.14 | % | 91.50 | % | 90.09 | % | 90.23 | % | 90.72 | % | 90.63 | % | 90.92 | % | 91.92 | % | 92.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2003 | 93.26 | % | 93.65 | % | 93.80 | % | 93.91 | % | 94.14 | % | 92.96 | % | 92.64 | % | 93.35 | % | 93.14 | % | 92.55 | % | 93.09 | % | 93.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2004 | 93.73 | % | 94.04 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.91 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.89 | % | 95.40 | % | 95.49 | % | 95.17 | % | 94.87 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2005 | 93.90 | % | 95.73 | % | 96.22 | % | 95.51 | % | 94.52 | % | 94.19 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.36 | % | 94.96 | % | 94.71 | % | 94.71 | % | 94.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2006 | 96.13 | % | 97.00 | % | 96.50 | % | 96.65 | % | 96.27 | % | 95.37 | % | 94.82 | % | 95.43 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.50 | % | 94.57 | % | 93.80 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2007 | 93.69 | % | 94.40 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Venutra County | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Venutra County | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Venutra County | 2004 | 95.38 | % | 95.80 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Venutra County | 2005 | 92.94 | % | 91.81 | % | 91.39 | % | 90.55 | % | 93.91 | % | 93.11 | % | 90.34 | % | 90.59 | % | 93.70 | % | 92.61 | % | 95.80 | % | 97.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Venutra County | 2006 | 95.97 | % | 98.32 | % | 96.64 | % | 96.01 | % | 97.98 | % | 96.85 | % | 95.80 | % | 95.63 | % | 94.96 | % | 94.75 | % | 95.80 | % | 96.22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Venutra County | 2007 | 91.82 | % | 94.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2002 | 92.21 | % | 90.81 | % | 91.73 | % | 91.55 | % | 92.06 | % | 90.35 | % | 91.91 | % | 92.97 | % | 90.93 | % | 89.67 | % | 91.41 | % | 91.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2003 | 91.08 | % | 91.31 | % | 91.05 | % | 91.66 | % | 92.00 | % | 90.58 | % | 91.02 | % | 92.34 | % | 92.41 | % | 92.31 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2004 | 94.30 | % | 93.80 | % | 93.44 | % | 94.50 | % | 95.07 | % | 94.62 | % | 96.09 | % | 97.93 | % | 98.45 | % | 97.62 | % | 96.80 | % | 96.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2005 | 96.26 | % | 95.84 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.41 | % | 96.68 | % | 96.84 | % | 96.41 | % | 97.37 | % | 96.80 | % | 96.12 | % | 96.00 | % | 95.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2006 | 94.13 | % | 94.49 | % | 94.62 | % | 94.74 | % | 94.78 | % | 95.03 | % | 95.10 | % | 96.37 | % | 96.03 | % | 96.17 | % | 95.75 | % | 94.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2007 | 94.14 | % | 94.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2002 | 93.02 | % | 93.21 | % | 93.19 | % | 93.28 | % | 93.53 | % | 92.73 | % | 92.57 | % | 92.64 | % | 92.50 | % | 92.80 | % | 93.28 | % | 93.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2003 | 93.33 | % | 93.33 | % | 93.41 | % | 93.70 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.23 | % | 92.91 | % | 93.07 | % | 92.89 | % | 92.83 | % | 92.96 | % | 92.77 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2004 | 93.21 | % | 93.29 | % | 93.53 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.88 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.87 | % | 94.26 | % | 94.42 | % | 94.20 | % | 94.05 | % | 94.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2005 | 94.01 | % | 94.40 | % | 94.74 | % | 94.70 | % | 94.47 | % | 94.25 | % | 94.12 | % | 94.70 | % | 94.88 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.85 | % | 94.57 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2006 | 94.80 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.01 | % | 94.91 | % | 95.00 | % | 94.66 | % | 94.45 | % | 94.94 | % | 94.83 | % | 94.38 | % | 94.44 | % | 94.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2007 | 93.72 | % | 94.01 | % |