Ross Stores (ROST) 10-Q 2005 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)
x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004
or
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from _______ to _______
	Commission file number:  0-14678

ROSS STORES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	94-1390387
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4440 Rosewood Drive, Pleasanton, California	94588-3050
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code	(925) 965-4400
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.	N/A

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesx Noo

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yesx Noo

          The number of shares of Common Stock, with $.01 par value, outstanding on August 19, 2004 was 147,496,502.

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
($000, except stores and per share data, unaudited)	July 31, 2004		August 2, 2003			July 31, 2004		August 2, 2003
SALES	$	1,008,600	$	965,610		$	2,000,492	$	1,844,894
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Cost of goods sold, including related buying, distribution and occupancy costs		772,743		724,206			1,523,365		1,377,454
Selling, general and administrative		164,032		151,832			325,463		296,971
Impairment of long-lived assets		18,000		—			18,000		—
Interest expense (income), net		336		(61	)		506		(131	)
Total costs and expenses		955,111		875,977			1,867,334		1,674,294
Earnings before taxes		53,489		89,633			133,158		170,600
Provision for taxes on earnings		20,914		35,047			52,065		66,705
Net earnings	$	32,575	$	54,586		$	81,093	$	103,895
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic	$	.22	$	.36		$	.54	$	.68
Diluted	$	.22	$	.35		$	.53	$	.67
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (000)
Basic		148,106		152,540			148,998		153,324
Diluted		150,903		155,384			152,148		155,924
Stores open at end of period		616		553			616		553

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

($000)	July 31, 2004			January 31, 2004			August 2, 2003
		(Unaudited)			(Note A)			(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents (includes $10,000 of restricted cash)	$	108,353		$	201,546		$	176,860
Accounts receivable		27,876			25,292			27,041
Merchandise inventory		897,542			841,491			815,495
Prepaid expenses and other		53,978			29,467			31,420
Deferred income taxes		22,742			22,742			16,645
Total Current Assets		1,110,491			1,120,538			1,067,461
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Land and buildings		28,759			57,057			54,772
Fixtures and equipment		570,833			517,350			432,060
Leasehold improvements		268,104			254,968			239,713
Construction-in-progress		20,012			74,507			101,189
		887,708			903,882			827,734
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		415,195			419,683			384,650
Property and equipment, net		472,513			484,199			443,084
Other long-term assets		58,007			52,473			50,327
Total Assets	$	1,641,011		$	1,657,210		$	1,560,872
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	471,651		$	448,044		$	467,126
Accrued expenses and other		151,359			142,370			146,501
Accrued payroll and benefits		103,056			112,284			83,707
Income taxes payable		(2,248	)		9,146			40,199
Total Current Liabilities		723,818			711,844			737,533
Long-term debt		50,000			50,000			50,000
Other long-term liabilities		68,251			60,238			56,250
Deferred income taxes		75,006			79,709			41,666
Total Liabilities		917,075			901,791			885,449
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock		1,478			1,514			1,521
Additional paid-in capital		398,659			385,212			350,341
Treasury stock		(8,447	)		(3,656	)		(1,244	)
Retained earnings		332,246			372,349			324,805
Total Stockholders’ Equity		723,936			755,419			675,423
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	1,641,011		$	1,657,210		$	1,560,872

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Six Months Ended
($000, unaudited)	July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings	$	81,093		$	103,895
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		43,276			35,733
Impairment of long-lived assets		18,000			—
Change in assets and liabilities:
Merchandise inventory		(56,051	)		(98,977	)
Other current assets, net		(27,095	)		(3,208	)
Accounts payable		30,033			74,389
Other current liabilities		(11,633	)		42,560
Other long-term, net		12,021			437
Net cash provided by operating activities		89,644			154,829
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property and equipment		(56,466	)		(70,366	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(56,466	)		(70,366	)
CASH FLOWS USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common stock related to stock plans, net		18,691			10,437
Proceeds from long-term debt		—			25,000
Treasury stock related to tax withholding		(8,447	)		(1,244	)
Repurchase of common stock		(123,847	)		(83,593	)
Dividends paid		(12,768	)		(8,852	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(126,371	)		(58,252	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(93,193	)		26,211
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period		201,546			150,649
End of period	$	108,353		$	176,860

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and Six Months Ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003
(Unaudited)

Note A: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation.  The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the records of the Company without audit and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position at July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003; the results of operations for the three and six months ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003; and changes in cash flows for the six months ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003.  The balance sheet at January 31, 2004, presented herein, has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Company as of the fiscal year then ended.

Accounting policies followed by the Company are described in Note A to the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted for purposes of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements.  The interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, including notes thereto, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004.

All share and per share information has been adjusted to reflect the effect of the Company’s two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend paid on December 18, 2003.

The results of operations for the three and six-month periods herein presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements as of July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, and for the three and six months then ended have been reviewed, prior to filing, by the registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm whose report covering their review of the financial statements is included in this report on page 8.

Reclassifications.  Certain reclassifications have been made in the 2003 financial statements to conform to the current presentation.

Treasury Stock.  The Company records treasury stock purchases at cost.  Treasury stock consists of shares used for tax withholding purposes related to grants of restricted stock to employees.

Stock-Based Compensation.  The Company accounts for stock-based awards to employees using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.”  Because the Company grants stock option awards at fair market value, no compensation expense is recorded at issuance.  Compensation expense for restricted stock awards is based on the market value of the shares awarded at the date of grant and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.  The disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123” are set forth below.

5

Had compensation costs for the Company’s stock option plan been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plan consistent with the methods of SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net earnings and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
($000, except per share data)		July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003			July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003
Net earnings	As reported	$	32,575		$	54,586		$	81,093		$	103,895
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net earnings, net of tax			2,295			2,207			4,488			4,345
Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of tax			(4,716	)		(4,227	)		(9,149	)		(8,423	)
Net earnings	Pro forma	$	30,154		$	52,566		$	76,432		$	99,817
Basic earnings per share	As reported	$	.22		$	.36		$	.54		$	.68
	Pro forma	$	.20		$	.35		$	.51		$	.65
Diluted earnings per share	As reported	$	.22		$	.35		$	.53		$	.67
	Pro forma	$	.20		$	.34		$	.50		$	.65

At July 31, 2004, the Company had two stock-based compensation plans. SFAS No. 123 establishes a fair value method of accounting for stock options and other equity instruments.  For determining pro forma earnings per share, the fair value of the stock options and employees’ purchase rights were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: 

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
Stock Options	July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003			July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003
Expected life from grant date (years)		3.1			2.9			3.1			3.1
Expected volatility		39.0	%		42.6	%		37.0	%		45.3	%
Risk-free interest rate		3.2	%		1.9	%		2.8	%		2.0	%
Dividend yield		0.6	%		0.5	%		0.6	%		0.5	%

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
Employee Stock Purchase Plan	July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003			July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003
Expected life from grant date (years)		1.0			1.0			1.0			1.0
Expected volatility		28.3	%		31.7	%		28.3	%		31.7	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.3	%		1.4	%		1.3	%		1.4	%
Dividend yield		0.5	%		0.5	%		0.5	%		0.5	%

6

The weighted average fair values per share of stock options granted for the three-month periods ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, were $7.48 and $6.17, and for the six-month periods ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, were $7.92 and $6.13, respectively.  The weighted average fair values per share of employee stock purchase awards for the three-month periods ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, were $6.81 and $5.98, and for the six-month periods ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, were $6.81 and $6.00, respectively.

Note B:  Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)

SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” requires earnings per share to be computed and reported as both basic EPS and diluted EPS.  Basic EPS is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net earnings by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period.  Dilutive EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if options to issue common stock were exercised into common stock.

For the three months ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, there were approximately 1,437,500 and 151,700 shares, and for the six months ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, there were approximately 618,900 and 340,500 shares, that could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future that were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS because their effect would have been anti-dilutive (option exercise price exceeds average stock price) in the periods presented.

The following is a reconciliation of the number of shares (denominator) used in the basic and diluted EPS computations (shares in thousands):

	Three Months Ended							Six Months Ended
	Basic EPS		Effect of Dilutive Common Stock Equivalents			Diluted EPS		Basic EPS		Effect of Dilutive Common Stock Equivalents			Diluted EPS
July 31, 2004
Shares		148,106		2,797			150,903		148,998		3,150			152,148
Amount	$	.22	$	.00		$	.22	$	.54	$	(.01	)	$	.53
August 2, 2003
Shares		152,540		2,844			155,384		153,324		2,600			155,924
Amount	$	.36	$	(.01	)	$	.35	$	.68	$	(.01	)	$	.67

Note C:  Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

During the second quarter, the Company relocated its corporate headquarters from Newark, California to Pleasanton, California and decided to pursue a sale of its Newark facility. In accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $18 million before taxes in the second quarter of 2004 to write-down the carrying value of its Newark facility from a net book value of approximately $33 million to the estimated fair value of approximately $15 million.  The fair value of the Newark facility assets held for sale of approximately $15 million is included in “Prepaid expenses and other” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. 

7

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ross Stores, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets of Ross Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, and the related condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the three-month and six-month periods then ended, and cash flows for the six-month periods then ended. These condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Ross Stores, Inc. as of January 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated April 1, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Francisco, California

September 7, 2004

8

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

This section and other parts of this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  The Company’s actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.  Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the subsection below entitled “Forward-Looking Statements and Factors Affecting Future Performance.”  The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s 2003 Form 10-K.  All information is based on the Company’s fiscal calendar.

Overview

The Company is the second largest off-price apparel retail company in the United States, with 616 stores in 26 states and Guam at July 31, 2004.  The Company’s primary strategy has been a continued focus on pursuing and refining its existing off-price business, and steadily expanding the number of stores and its geographic markets.  In establishing growth objectives for the business, the Company closely monitors market share trends for the off-price industry.  According to data from the NPD Group, which provides global sales and marketing information on the retail industry, the off-price share of total apparel sales in 2003 grew to 7.8% from 7.4% in 2002, reflecting the ongoing importance of value to consumers.  Full-priced department stores and mass merchandise retailers experienced a decline in apparel market share over the same period.  The Company’s strategies are designed to take advantage of these growth trends and continued customer demand for name-brand fashions for the family and the home at competitive everyday discounts.

In addition, the Company recently introduced a new off-price concept, dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM, to target what it believes to be an underserved but fast-growing demographic group – lower income households.  The Company believes that ultimately the United States can support a total of 1,500 Ross locations and over 500 dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM stores – for an aggregate potential of over 2,000 locations.   Considering the significant expansion opportunities that remain in both existing and new markets, the Company plans to grow to over 1,000 stores by the end of fiscal 2008 and generate more than $7 billion annually in revenue by fiscal 2008.

9

Results of Operations

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003			July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003
SALES
Sales (millions)	$	1,009		$	966		$	2,000		$	1,845
Sales growth		4.4	%		10.1	%		8.4	%		8.7	%
Change in comparable store sales		(3	)%		0	%		0	%		(1	)%
COSTS AND EXPENSES (as a percent of sales)
Cost of goods sold, including related buying,  distribution and occupancy costs		76.6	%		75.0	%		76.1	%		74.7	%
Selling, general and administrative		16.3	%		15.7	%		16.3	%		16.1	%
Impairment of long-lived assets		1.8	%		—			0.9	%		—
EARNINGS BEFORE TAXES		5.3	%		9.3	%		6.7	%		9.2	%
NET EARNINGS		3.2	%		5.7	%		4.1	%		5.6	%

Stores.  The Company’s operating strategy is to open additional stores in new and existing geographic markets based on the following considerations: market penetration, the ability to reduce overhead expenses, local demographic characteristics, competition and population density. Management continually evaluates opportunistic real estate acquisitions and opportunities for potential new store locations. The Company also evaluates its current store locations and determines store closures based on similar criteria.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	July 31, 2004		August 2, 2003		July 31, 2004		August 2, 2003
Stores at the beginning of the period		599		530		568		507
Stores opened in the period		17		23		48		46
Stores closed in the period		—		—		—		—
Stores at the end of the period		616		553		616		553

Sales.   The 4% total sales increase for the three months ended July 31, 2004 over the prior year reflects the opening of 17 new stores during the period, the three months impact of the stores opened in 2003, partially offset by a 3% decrease in sales from “comparable” stores (defined as stores that have been open for more than 14 complete months).  The 8% total sales increase for the six months ended July 31, 2004 over the prior year reflects the opening of 48 new stores during the period, the six months impact of the stores opened in 2003, and flat comparable store sales.

10

The Company’s sales mix for the three and six months ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003 was as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003			July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003
Ladies		36	%		35	%		36	%		35	%
Home accents and bed and bath		20	%		19	%		19	%		19	%
Men’s		17	%		18	%		17	%		17	%
Fine jewelry, accessories, lingerie and fragrances		12	%		12	%		11	%		12	%
Children’s		6	%		8	%		8	%		9	%
Shoes		9	%		8	%		9	%		8	%
Total		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

Management expects to address the competitive climate for apparel and home goods off-price retailers by pursuing and refining the Company’s existing strategies and by continuing to strengthen its organization, to diversify the merchandise mix, and to more fully develop the organization and systems to strengthen regional merchandise offerings.  Although the Company’s existing strategies and store expansion program contributed to sales gains for the three and six month periods ended July 31, 2004, there can be no assurance that these strategies will result in a continuation of revenue and profit growth. 

During April 2004, the Company installed a new Core Merchandising System, which is a computer-based information system that over time is expected to improve the Company’s ability to plan, buy and allocate merchandise more precisely.  Since the installation of the new merchandising system, the Company has experienced difficulties in generating all necessary merchandising related information. The Company believes that it made progress during the second quarter of 2004 in remedying problems associated with the Core Merchandising System.  Information to support the allocation function has returned to normal.  Management expects the balance of the information requirements most important to the buying process to be addressed during the third quarter of 2004, and the remaining system issues to be remedied by the end of fiscal year 2004.  However, the Company expects a residual impact to sales and earnings throughout the second half of 2004 as the Company cycles through merchandise imbalances created by these system issues. 

Cost of Goods Sold.   Cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales for the three months ended July 31, 2004 increased approximately 160 basis points compared with the same period in the prior year.  This increase is largely attributable to the reduced leverage resulting from the 3% decrease in comparable store sales, higher distribution and logistics costs, and higher markdowns during the quarter. Distribution and logistics costs as a percentage of sales increased by approximately 80 basis points.  Distribution costs were also affected by lower productivity associated with the ramp-up of new distribution center systems.   Higher markdowns resulted in an approximate 55 basis point increase in cost of goods sold.  In addition, store occupancy costs as a percentage of sales increased by approximately 50 basis points, partially offset by an approximate 25 basis point decrease in other components of cost of good sold.

11

Cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales for the six months ended July 31, 2004, increased approximately 150 basis points compared with the same period in the prior year.  This increase is mainly attributable to the reduced leverage resulting from flat comparable store sales during the period.  In addition, distribution center expenses were negatively affected by recovery costs resulting from the partial roof collapse and temporary closing of the Fort Mill, South Carolina distribution center at the end of January 2004, as well as ramp-up expenses associated with the retrofit of the Carlisle, Pennsylvania center and the start-up phase of the Perris, California facility.  Distribution costs were also impacted by lower productivity associated with the ramp-up of new distribution center systems.  As a percentage of sales, distribution and logistics costs increased by approximately 115 basis points. In addition, dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM buying-related expenses resulted in an approximate 25 basis point increase in cost of goods sold compared to the prior year.  Store occupancy costs as a percentage of sales increased by approximately 30 basis points.  This increase was partially offset by an approximate 20 basis point improvement in merchandise margin.

There can be no assurance that the gross profit margins realized for the three and six months ended July 31, 2004 will continue in the future.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  For the three months ended July 31, 2004, selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) as a percentage of sales increased by approximately 55 basis points, primarily due to an approximate 60 basis point increase in store operating costs.  In addition,  depreciation and occupancy costs increased approximately 15 basis points primarily due to decreased leverage from the decline in comparable store sales. These expense pressures were partially offset by an approximate 20 basis point decline in general and administrative costs as a percentage of sales.

For the six months ended July 31, 2004, selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) as a percentage of sales increased by approximately 20 basis points, primarily due to an approximate 20 basis point increase in store operating costs and depreciation resulting from decreased leverage related to flat comparable store sales for the six months ended July 31, 2004.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.  During the second quarter, the Company relocated its corporate headquarters from Newark, California to Pleasanton, California and decided to pursue a sale of its Newark facility.  In accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $18 million before taxes in the second quarter of 2004 to write-down the carrying value of its Newark facility from a net book value of approximately $33 million to the estimated fair value of approximately $15 million.  The fair value of the Newark facility assets held for sale of approximately $15 million is included in “Prepaid expenses and other” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. 

Taxes on Earnings.  The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and six months ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003 was approximately 39%, which represents the applicable Federal and State statutory rates reduced by the Federal benefit received for State taxes.  During 2004, the Company expects its effective tax rate to remain at approximately 39%. 

Net Earnings.  The decrease in net earnings as a percentage of sales for the three months ended July 31, 2004, compared to the same period in the prior year, is due to higher cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales, higher selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of sales and the impairment of long-lived assets in the second quarter.  Diluted earnings per share decreased by 37% as a result of a decrease in net earnings partially offset by a decrease in weighted average diluted shares outstanding, which was largely attributable to the acquisition of common stock under the Company’s stock repurchase program.

The decrease in net earnings as a percentage of sales for the six months ended July 31, 2004, compared to the same period in the prior year, is primarily due to higher cost of goods sold as a  percentage of sales, higher selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of sales, and the impairment of long-lived assets in the second quarter.  Diluted earnings per share decreased by 21% as a result of a decrease in net earnings partially offset by a decrease in weighted average diluted shares outstanding, which was largely attributable to the acquisition of common stock under the Company’s stock repurchase program.

12

Financial Condition

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s primary sources of funds for its business activities are cash flows from operations and short-term trade credit. The Company’s primary ongoing cash requirements are for seasonal and new store inventory purchases and capital expenditures in connection with new stores and investments in information systems and infrastructure.  The Company also uses cash to repurchase stock under its stock repurchase program and to pay dividends.

	Six Months Ended
($000)	July 31, 2004			August 2, 2003
Cash flows from Operating activities	$	89,644		$	154,829
Cash flows used in Investing activities		(56,466	)		(70,366	)
Cash flows used in Financing activities		(126,371	)		(58,252	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(93,193	)	$	26,211

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $89.6 million for the six months ended July 31, 2004, and $154.8 million for the six months ended August 2, 2003.  The primary source of cash from operations for the six months ended July 31, 2004 related to net earnings excluding non-cash expenses for depreciation and amortization and the second quarter impairment of long-lived assets, partially offset by cash used to finance merchandise inventory and other current assets. The decrease in cash flows from operations for the six months ended July 31, 2004 is primarily due to a decrease of accounts payable leverage (defined as accounts payable divided by merchandise inventory) from 57% at August 2, 2003 to 53% at July 31, 2004.  Working capital (defined as current assets less current liabilities) was $387 million as of July 31, 2004, compared to $330 million as of August 2, 2003. The Company’s primary source of liquidity is the sale of its merchandise inventory.  Management regularly reviews the age and condition of the merchandise and is able to maintain current inventory in its stores through the replenishment processes and liquidation of non-current merchandise through clearance markdowns.

Investing Activities

During the six-month periods ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, the Company spent approximately $56.5 million and $70.4 million, respectively, for capital expenditures (net of leased equipment) for fixtures and leasehold improvements to open new stores, implementation of management information systems, implementation of materials handling equipment and related distribution center systems and for various other expenditures for existing stores, merchant and corporate offices.  The Company opened 48 and 46 new stores during the six months ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, respectively. 

13

The Company is forecasting approximately $145 million in capital expenditures for fiscal 2004 to fund fixtures and leasehold improvements to open 70 net new Ross stores and ten dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM stores.  In addition, these capital expenditures are expected to cover the relocation, or remodel of existing stores, and investments in store and merchandising systems, distribution center equipment and systems and various central office expenditures. The Company expects to fund these expenditures out of cash flows from operations.

Financing Activities

During the six-month periods ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, liquidity and capital requirements were provided by cash flows from operations and trade credit. 

The Company repurchased 4.5 million and 4.3 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $123.8 million and $83.6 million during the six month periods ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, respectively. These stock repurchases were funded by cash flows from operations.

Short-term trade credit represents a significant source of financing for investments in merchandise inventory.  Trade credit arises from customary payment terms and trade practices with the Company’s vendors.  Management regularly reviews the adequacy of credit available to the Company from all sources and has been able to maintain adequate lines to meet the capital and liquidity requirements of the Company.

The table below presents significant contractual payment obligations of the Company as of July 31, 2004:

($000) Contractual Obligations	Less than 1 Year		2 – 3 Years		4 – 5 Years		After 5 Years		Total
Long-term debt	$	—	$	50,000	$	—	$	—	$	50,000
Operating leases		214,393		368,299		294,485		379,638		1,256,815
Other financings:
Synthetic leases		10,631		11,484		8,181		17,727		48,023
Other synthetic lease obligations		—		87,237		—		56,000		143,237
Purchase obligations		750,210		11,579		956		780		763,525
Total contractual obligations	$	975,234	$	528,599	$	303,622	$	454,145	$	2,261,600

14

Long-Term Debt.   The Company has a $50 million senior unsecured term loan agreement to finance the equipment and information systems for the new Southern California distribution center.  Total borrowings under the term loan were $50 million as of July 31, 2004.  Interest is payable no less than quarterly at the bank’s applicable prime rate or at LIBOR plus an applicable margin (currently 150 basis points) which resulted in an effective interest rate of 2.8% at July 31, 2004.  All amounts outstanding under the term loan will be due and payable in December 2006.  Borrowings under this term loan are subject to certain operating and financial covenants including maintaining certain interest coverage and leverage ratios. 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Operating Leases.  Substantially all of the Company’s store sites, certain distribution centers, and the Company’s buying offices and new corporate headquarters are leased and, except for certain leasehold improvements and equipment, do not represent long-term capital investments.  The Company owns its former corporate headquarters and distribution center in Newark, California, and its distribution center in Carlisle, Pennsylvania.

In July 2003, the Company entered into an arrangement to lease certain equipment in its stores for its point-of-sale (“POS”) hardware and software systems.  This lease is accounted for as an operating lease for financial reporting purposes.  The initial term of this lease is two years and the Company has options to renew the lease for three one-year periods.  Alternatively, the Company may purchase or return the equipment at the end of the initial or each renewal term.  The Company has guaranteed the value of the equipment at the end of the initial lease term and each renewal period, if exercised, at amounts not to exceed 57%, 43%, 27% and 10%, respectively, of the equipment’s estimated initial fair market value of $24 million. The Company’s obligation under the residual value guarantee at the end of the original lease term of 57% of the equipment’s initial fair value, or $13.3 million, is included in “Other synthetic lease obligations” in the table above.

In January 2004, the Company commenced its lease on its new corporate headquarters in Pleasanton, California. The lease has an initial term of 10.5 years with three five-year renewal options. The Company occupied the space in July 2004.

Other Financings.  The Company leases a 1.3 million square foot distribution center in Fort Mill, South Carolina. This distribution center, including equipment and systems, is being financed under an $87.3 million, five-year operating lease, commonly referred to as a synthetic lease, which expires in May 2006.   Monthly rent expense is currently payable at 75 basis points over 30-day LIBOR on the lease balance of $87.3 million.  At the end of the lease term, the Company must refinance the $87.3 million synthetic lease facility, purchase the distribution center at the amount of the lease balance, or arrange a sale of the distribution center to a third party.  The Company has agreed under a residual value guarantee to pay the lessor up to 85% of the lease balance.  The Company’s obligation under this residual value guarantee of $74.2 million is included in “Other synthetic lease obligations” in the table above.

In July 2003, the Company refinanced its existing five-year operating lease, commonly referred to as a synthetic lease, for its Southern California distribution center with a new ten-year synthetic lease facility that expires in July 2013.  Rent expense on this center is payable monthly at a fixed annual rate of 5.8% on the lease balance of $70 million.  At the end of the lease term, the Company must refinance the $70 million synthetic lease facility, purchase the distribution center at the amount of the then-outstanding lease balance, or arrange a sale of the distribution center to a third party.  If the distribution center is sold to a third party for less than $70 million, the Company has agreed under a residual value guarantee to pay the lessor the shortfall below $70 million not to exceed $56 million. The Company’s contractual obligation of $56 million is included in “Other synthetic lease obligations” in the above table. The equipment and systems for the Southern California center were financed with a $50 million, five-year senior unsecured term debt facility, which is included in “Long-term debt” in the table above.

15

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” the Company has recognized a liability and corresponding asset for the fair value of the residual value guarantee in the amount of $8.3 million for the Southern California distribution center and $1.5 million for the POS lease.  These residual value guarantees are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the original terms of the leases. The current portion of the related asset and liability is recorded in “Prepaid expenses and other” and “Accrued expenses and other,” respectively, and the long-term portion of the related assets and liabilities is recorded in “Other long-term assets” and “Other long-term liabilities,” respectively, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. 

In addition, the Company leases two separate warehouse facilities in Carlisle, Pennsylvania with operating leases expiring through 2011.  In January 2004, the Company entered into a two-year lease with two one-year options for a warehouse facility in Fort Mill, South Carolina. These three leased facilities are being used primarily to store packaway merchandise.

The two synthetic lease facilities described above, as well as the Company’s long-term debt and revolving credit facility, have covenant restrictions requiring the Company to maintain certain interest coverage and leverage ratios.  In addition, the interest rates under these agreements may vary depending on the Company’s actual interest coverage ratios.  As of July 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. 

In December 2003, the FASB issued the revised FIN No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which addresses consolidation by business enterprises of entities that are not controllable through voting interests or in which the equity investors do not bear the residual economic risks and rewards.  FIN No. 46(R) explains how to identify variable interest entities and how an enterprise should assess its interest in an entity to decide whether to consolidate that entity. 

The Company was not required under FIN No. 46(R) to consolidate its $87.3 million synthetic lease facility for its South Carolina distribution center and its $70 million synthetic lease facility for its Southern California distribution center because the lessors/owners of these distribution centers are not variable interest entities. 

Purchase Obligations.  As of July 31, 2004, the Company had purchase obligations of $763.5 million.  These purchase obligations primarily consist of merchandise inventory purchase orders, commitments related to store fixtures, supplies, and information technology service and maintenance contracts.  Total merchandise inventory purchase orders of $697.0 million are all purchase obligations of less than one year.  In the course of working with the Company’s vendors, a portion of the amount shown as purchase obligations may be cancelable without penalty.

16

Commercial Credit Facilities

The table below presents significant commercial credit facilities available to the Company as of July 31, 2004:

($000)	Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period								Total Amount Committed
Commercial Credit Available	Less than 1 Year		2 - 3 Years		4 - 5 Years		Over 5 Years
Revolving credit facility*	$	—	$	—	$	600,000	$	—	$	600,000
Standby letters of credit, excluding those secured by the revolving credit facility		28,176		—		—		—		28,176
Total commercial commitments	$	28,176	$	—	$	600,000	$	—	$	628,176

* Contains a $200 million sublimit for issuances of letters of credit, of which $37.1 million is outstanding and $162.9 million is available as of July 31, 2004.

Revolving Credit Facility.  During the quarter ended May 1, 2004, the Company entered into a $600 million revolving credit facility with its banks, which contains a $200 million sublimit for issuances of letters of credit of which $162.9 million was available at July 31, 2004.  Interest is LIBOR-based plus an applicable margin (currently 75 basis points) and is payable upon borrowing maturity but no less than quarterly.  Borrowing under this credit facility is subject to the Company maintaining certain interest coverage and leverage ratios.  As of July 31, 2004, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under this facility.  This existing revolving credit facility is scheduled to expire in March 2009.

Standby Letters of Credit.  The Company uses standby letters of credit to collateralize certain obligations related to its self-insured workers’ compensation and general liability claims.  The Company had $65.2 million and $70.9 million in standby letters of credit outstanding at July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, respectively.

Trade Letters of Credit.  The Company had $27.1 million and $22.9 million in trade letters of credit outstanding at July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003, respectively.

Dividends.    In May 2004, a quarterly cash dividend payment of $.0425 per common share was declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, and was paid on July 1, 2004.  In August 2004, a quarterly cash dividend of $.0425 per common share was declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, payable on or about October 1, 2004.

Stock Repurchase Program.  In January 2004, the Company announced that the Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program of up to $350 million for 2004 and 2005.  During the six months ended July 31, 2004, the Company repurchased approximately 4.5 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $123.8 million. 

The Company estimates that cash flows from operations, existing bank credit lines and trade credit are adequate to meet operating cash needs, fund the planned capital investments, repurchase common stock and make quarterly dividend payments for at least the next twelve months.

17

Relocation of Corporate Headquarters

During the second quarter, the Company relocated its corporate headquarters from Newark, California to Pleasanton, California and decided to pursue a sale of its Newark facility. In accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $18 million before taxes in the second quarter 2004 to write-down the carrying value of its Newark facility from a net book value of approximately $33 million to the estimated fair value of approximately $15 million.  The fair value of the Newark facility assets held for sale of approximately $15 million is included in “Prepaid expenses and other” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. 

dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM

During 2003, the Company announced the development of dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM, a new off-price concept targeted to serve the needs of lower-income households, which it believes to be one of the fastest growing demographic markets in the country.  This new business will generally have similar merchandise departments and categories to that of Ross, but will feature a different mix of brands, consisting mostly of moderate and discount store labels at lower average price points.  The Company opened five dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM locations in California during August 2004 and plans to open an additional five dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM stores during September 2004.  The dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM store prototype is about 25,000 gross square feet located in established strip shopping centers in densely populated urban and suburban neighborhoods.  The dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM and Ross merchant, distribution and store organizations will be separate and distinct; however, dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM will share certain corporate and support services with Ross.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts.  The estimates and assumptions are evaluated on an on-going basis and are based on historical experience and on various other factors that management believes to be reasonable.   The Company believes the following critical accounting policies describe the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:

Inventory.  The Company’s merchandise inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a weighted average cost method.  The Company purchases manufacturer overruns and canceled orders both during and at the end of a season which are referred to as “packaway” inventory.  Packaway inventory is purchased with the intent that it will be stored in the Company’s warehouses until a later date, which may even be the beginning of the same selling season in the following year.  Included in the carrying value of the Company’s inventory is a provision for shrinkage.  The shrinkage reserve is based on historical shrinkage rates as evaluated through the Company’s physical inventory counts and cycle counts.  If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, or if sales or shrinkage rates of the inventory are different than anticipated, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

18

Long-lived Assets.  The Company records a long-lived asset impairment charge when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash flows.  An impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the undiscounted cash flow of an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group. During the second quarter, the Company relocated its corporate headquarters from Newark, California to Pleasanton, California and decided to pursue a sale of its Newark facility.  The Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $18 million before taxes in the second quarter 2004 to write-down the carrying value of its Newark facility from its net book value of approximately $33 million to the estimated fair value of approximately $15 million.  The fair value of the Newark facility assets held for sale of approximately $15 million is included in “Prepaid expenses and other” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.  If the facility is sold for less than the estimated fair market value, an additional write-down would be required.

Self-Insurance.  The Company self insures certain of its workers’ compensation and general liability risks as well as certain of its health insurance plans. The Company’s self-insurance liability is determined actuarially, based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported.  Should a greater amount of claims occur compared to what is estimated or the costs of medical care and state statutory requirements increase beyond what was anticipated, reserves recorded may not be sufficient and additional charges could be required.

The above listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of the Company’s accounting policies.  In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

Forward-Looking Statements and Factors Affecting Future Performance

This report includes certain forward-looking statements, which reflect the Company’s current beliefs, projections and estimates with respect to future events and the Company’s future financial performance, operations and competitive position. The words “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “looking ahead,” “forecast,” “plan,”  “projected,” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.

In particular, this report contains forward-looking statements regarding planned new store growth, the time needed to remedy difficulties with the new core merchandising systems and the severity, duration and financial impact of resulting in-store inventory imbalances, all of which are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from historical results or current expectations.  The Company is continuing to assess the implementation of new information systems, and cannot be certain that all problems have currently been discovered or that their scope is understood.   

Risks and uncertainties that apply to both Ross and dd’s DISCOUNTS^SM stores include, without limitation, the Company’s ability to successfully and quickly implement, integrate and correct difficulties in its new core merchandising system and various other new supply chain and merchandising systems, including generation of all necessary information in a timely and cost effective manner, interruptions in the Company’s ability to operate its distribution center network  in a timely and cost effective manner, the Company’s ability to continue to purchase attractive brand-name merchandise at desirable discounts, the anticipated relaxation of trade restrictions with China in January 2005, which may affect the Company’s buying strategies and price points,  the Company’s ability to obtain acceptable new store locations, the Company’s ability to identify and successfully enter new geographic markets, and the Company’s ability to attract and retain personnel with the retail talent necessary to execute its strategies.  

19

The Company’s corporate headquarters, certain of its distribution centers and 30% of its stores are located in California.  Therefore, a downturn in the California economy or a major California natural disaster could significantly affect the Company’s operating results and financial condition. 

In addition, the Company is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that are common to companies in the retail apparel and home-related merchandise markets, including competitive pressures in the apparel industry, changes in the level of consumer spending on or preferences for apparel or home-related merchandise, changes in geopolitical conditions and deterioration or uncertainty regarding general economic conditions, or unseasonable weather trends.

The Company’s continued success depends, in part, upon its ability to increase sales at existing locations, and to open new stores and to operate stores on a profitable basis.  There can be no assurance that the Company’s existing strategies and store expansion program will result in a continuation of revenue and profit growth. 

Future economic and industry trends that could potentially impact revenue and profitability remain difficult to predict.  The factors underlying the Company’s forecasts are dynamic and subject to change.  As a result, any forecasts speak only as of the date they are given and do not necessarily reflect the Company’s outlook at any other point in time.  The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements.

Other risk factors are detailed in the Company’s Form 10-K for fiscal 2003.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to market risks, which primarily include changes in interest rates.  The Company does not engage in financial transactions for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest that is payable on the Company’s credit facilities and long-term debt is based on variable interest rates and is, therefore, affected by changes in market interest rates.  In addition, lease payments under certain synthetic lease agreements are determined based on variable interest rates and are, therefore, affected by changes in market interest rates. 

A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in prevailing market interest rates would not have materially impacted its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows for the three and six months ended July 31, 2004. The Company does not consider the potential losses in future earnings and cash flows from reasonably possible near term changes in interest rates or foreign exchange rates to be material.

The Company uses forward contracts to hedge against fluctuations in foreign currency prices. The fair value of the outstanding forward contracts at July 31, 2004 was immaterial.

20

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.  The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any change occurred during the second fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that there was no such change during the second quarter.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met.  In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.

21

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 2.  CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Information regarding shares of common stock repurchased by the Company during the second quarter of 2004 is as follows:

Period	Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased (1)		Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs ($000)
May (5/2/2004-5/29/2004)		423,639	$	26.48		419,971	$	280,000
June (5/30/2004-7/3/2004)		1,164,283	$	26.68		1,165,000	$	249,000
July (7/4/2004-7/31/2004)		1,014,619	$	23.31		973,032	$	226,000
Total		2,602,541	$	25.34		2,558,003	$	226,000

(1) The Company acquired 44,538 shares for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 related to required income tax withholdings for restricted stock.  All remaining shares were repurchased under the $350 million stock repurchase program publicly announced on February 5, 2004, which expires February 4, 2006.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, held on May 20, 2004 (the “2004 Annual Meeting”), the stockholders of the Company voted on and approved the following proposals:

Proposal 1: To elect three Class III directors (Michael J. Bush, Norman A. Ferber and James C. Peters) for a three-year term.

Proposal 2: To approve the Ross Stores, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.

Proposal 3: To approve an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 300,000,000 to 600,000,000 shares.

Proposal 4: To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending January 29, 2005.

22

2004 ANNUAL MEETING ELECTION RESULTS

PROPOSAL 1:  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

DIRECTOR	IN FAVOR	WITHHELD	TERM EXPIRES
Michael J. Bush	82,689,637	54,714,501	2007
Norman A. Ferber	79,953,877	57,450,261	2007
James C. Peters	88,786,421	48,617,717	2007

PROPOSAL 2:  APPROVAL OF THE ROSS STORES, INC. 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

IN FAVOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN	BROKER NON-VOTES
68,359,879	59,742,097	105,743	9,196,419

PROPOSAL 3:  APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FROM 300,000,000 TO 600,000,000 SHARES

FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
100,004,723	37,347,577	51,838

PROPOSAL 4:  RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JANUARY 29, 2005

FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
115,925,503	21,437,196	41,439

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)	Exhibits
		Incorporated herein by reference to the list of Exhibits contained in the Exhibit Index within this Report.
(b)	Reports on Form 8-K
		During the period that is the subject of this quarterly report, the Company furnished current reports on Form 8-K, to reference and include as exhibits press releases issued to the public by the Company, on the following dates:
		1.     May 6, 2004 – reporting under Item 12.
		2.     May 19, 2004 – reporting under Item 12.

23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	ROSS STORES, INC.
	Registrant
Date:  September 9, 2004	/s/ J. CALL
	John G. Call Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Corporate Secretary

24

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Exhibit
3.1	Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation dated May 21, 2004, Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation dated June 5, 2002 and Corrected First Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
3.2	Amended By-laws, dated August 25, 1994, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-Q filed by Ross Stores for its quarter ended July 30, 1994.
10.30	Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement between Irene Jamieson and Ross Stores, Inc., effective as of May 1, 2004.
10.31	Ross Stores, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed by Ross Stores, Inc. on April 15, 2004.
10.32	Form of Stock Option Agreement for options granted pursuant to Ross Stores, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
10.33	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for stock awards granted pursuant to the Ross Stores, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
15	Letter re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302(a).
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302(a).
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

25