The Company’s executive compensation program consists of two key elements: (i) an annual component consisting of base salary and incentive compensation and (ii) a long-term component, principally stock options.
The Compensation Committee recommends annual salary levels for each of the Named Executives, and for other senior executives of the Company, to the Board of Directors. The recommendations of the Compensation Committee for base salary levels for senior executives of the Company are determined annually, in part, by evaluating the responsibilities of the position and examining market compensation levels and trends for similar positions in the marketplace.
Additional factors which the Compensation Committee considers in recommending annual adjustments to base salaries include: results of operation of the Company, sales, stockholder returns, and the experience, work-performance, leadership and team building skills of each executive. The Company receives information from the Chief Executive Officer with regard to these matters. While each of these factors is considered in relatively equal weight, the Compensation Committee does not utilize performance matrices or measured weightings in its review. Each year, the Compensation Committee conducts a structured review of base compensation of senior executives with input from the Chief Executive Officer.
During 2001, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board of Directors approved an annual incentive compensation plan for members of management. Under the terms of the plan, a percentage of net income above the annual rate of income of $250,000 is allocated to be paid to senior executives and managers of the Corporation. The amount of profit and incentive compensation for each participant is determined on a quarterly basis. During 2004, incentive compensation under the plan was paid to Robert L. Montgomery, David G. Kreher, Donald E. Gibbons, Jr., Steven D. Albright, Stephen M. Merrick, Scott Montgomery, David Barnes, Steve Hastings, Ryan Montgomery and 14 other managers of the Company.
The long-term component of compensation provided to executives of the Company has been in the form of stock options. The Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that a significant portion of the total compensation to executives be in the form of stock options. Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of the grant. Stock options are exercisable between one and ten years from the date granted. Such stock options provide incentive for the creation of stockholder value over the long-term since the full benefit of the compensation package for an executive cannot be realized unless an appreciation in the price of the Company’s Common Stock occurs over a specified number of years.
The magnitude of the stock option awards are determined annually by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors. Generally, the number of options granted to an executive has been based on the relative salary level of the executive.
On July 17, 2001, incentive stock options to purchase up to 291,666, 178,571, 89,285, and 34,970 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were granted to Messrs. Montgomery, Kreher, Gibbons, and Steve Hastings, respectively, under the 2001 Stock Option Plan (the “2001 Plan”). In addition, on July 17, 2001, non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 80,356 and 22,321 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were granted to Messrs. Montgomery and Carl Hastings respectively, under the 2001 Plan.
There were no stock options granted to any of the Named Executives in 2000, 2002, 2003 and 2004.
CEO Compensation
The Compensation Committee utilizes the same standards and methods for recommending annual base compensation for the Chief Executive Officer of the Company as it does for other senior executive officers of the Company.
In 1997, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Robert L. Montgomery, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, providing that Mr. Montgomery’s base annual compensation would not be less than $485,000. During 2002, 2003 and 2004, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the base salary of Mr. Montgomery was $642,625, $642,625 and $642,625, respectively. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, annual incentive compensation was paid to Mr. Montgomery in the amounts of $207,545, $366,660 and $442,400, respectively, under the Company’s annual incentive compensation plan based on profits of the Company.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed the base compensation and incentive compensation of Mr. Montgomery in relation to compensation levels of executives at other comparable companies and in light of the performance of the Company. Over the past three years, the base compensation of Mr. Montgomery has not been increased, despite the fact that, over that period, the net sales of the Company have increased by more than 83% and the net income of the Company has increased from $308,440 to $5,386,689. Increases during that period in the short-term component of Mr. Montgomery’s compensation have been made only based on the incentive portion of annual compensation that is based on the profitability of the Company.
15
The Compensation Committee recommended that Mr. Montgomery (and other senior executives of the Company) receive incentive and non-qualified stock options, consistent with observed market practices, so that a significant portion of his total compensation will be based upon, and consistent with, returns to stockholders. In 2001, Mr. Montgomery was granted incentive stock options to purchase up to 291,666 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, and non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 80,356 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, no stock options were granted to Mr. Montgomery.
Compensation Committee: | |
Donald L. McCain, John B. Akin |
Comparative Stock Price Performance Graph
The following graph compares, for the period January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2004, the cumulative total return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) on the Company’s Common Stock with (i) NASDAQ Stock Market Index (U.S.) and (ii) a peer group including the following
companies: Mannatech, Inc., Nature’s Sunshine Products, Inc., Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc. and USANA Health Sciences, Inc. The peer group consists of other companies marketing nutritional products through direct sales. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on January 1, 2000, in the Company’s Common Stock and each of the other investment categories.
The historical stock prices of the Company’s Common Stock shown on the graph below are not necessarily indicative of future price performance. Per share value as of December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is based on the Common Stock’s closing price as of such date. All prices reflect a 5 for 4 stock split issued to holders of record on November 14, 2003.
The information under this heading and under the headings “Report of the Audit Committee” and “Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation” shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
Total Return To Shareholders
(Includes reinvestment of dividends)
| ANNUAL RETURN PERCENTAGE Years Ending |
---|
Company Name / Index | Dec00 | | Dec01 | | Dec02 | | Dec03 | | Dec04 |
---|
|
RELIV INTERNATIONAL INC | | 21.21 | | 0.00 | | 343.81 | | 37.34 | | 75.76 |
NASDAQ STOCK MARKET (U.S) | | -39.69 | | -20.68 | | -30.86 | | 49.51 | | 8.83 |
PEER GROUP | | -49.64 | | 72.30 | | 15.74 | | 219.29 | | 48.07 |
16
| INDEXED RETURNS Years Ending |
---|
Company Name / Index | | Base Period Dec99 | | Dec00 | | Dec01 | | Dec02 | | Dec03 | | Dec04 |
---|
|
RELIV INTERNATIONAL INC | | 100 | | 121.21 | | 121.21 | | 537.95 | | 738.82 | | 1298.54 |
NASDAQ STOCK MARKET (U.S) | | 100 | | 60.31 | | 47.84 | | 33.07 | | 49.45 | | 53.81 |
PEER GROUP | | 100 | | 50.36 | | 86.76 | | 100.42 | | 320.64 | | 474.76 |
Peer Group Companies | | |
---|
|
ADVANCED NUTRACEUTICALS INC (formerly Nutrition for Life International) | | | |
MANNATECH INC | | | |
NATURES SUNSHINE PRODS INC | | | |
REXALL SUNDOWN INC (Acquired 8/2000, so no longer included in peer group data) | |
USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC | | | |
Employment Agreements
In June 1997, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Robert L. Montgomery replacing a prior agreement. The Agreement was originally for a term of six years commencing on January 1, 1997 with a provision for automatic one year renewal terms, and provides for Mr. Montgomery to receive base annual compensation during the term of not less than $485,000. Mr. Montgomery is also to participate in the annual incentive compensation and the long-term incentive compensation plans of the Company adopted in April, 1994, the Company’s stock option plan and such other compensation plans as the Company may from time to time have for executives of the Company. In the event of Mr. Montgomery’s death during the term of the Agreement, payments equal to his total compensation under the Agreement will be made to his heirs for a period of six months. The Agreement also allows Mr. Montgomery the option, upon reaching age 60, to reduce his level of service to the Company by approximately one-half with a corresponding decrease in position and compensation. Mr. Montgomery also has the option upon reaching age 60 to terminate his active service and continue in a consulting capacity. The term of the consulting period shall be 10 years and Mr. Montgomery will receive approximately 20% of his prior annual compensation as a consulting fee. The Agreement includes the obligation of Mr. Montgomery to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information of the Company and contains a covenant of Mr. Montgomery not to compete with the Company.
In January 2002, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Dr. Hastings replacing a prior Employment Agreement. The Services Agreement is for a period of twenty years. The employment of Dr. Hastings shall be for a term commencing on July 1, 2001 and expiring on June 30, 2006. During the initial term of employment, the Company shall pay Dr. Hastings a basic salary at the rate of $22,500 per month. Upon expiration of the term of employment, Dr. Hastings shall be retained to provide consulting services to the Company for the remainder of the term of the Services Agreement. During the consulting term, the Company
17
shall pay Dr. Hastings the sum of $10,000 per month. During the term of the Services Agreement, the Company shall be entitled to use the name and likeness of Dr. Hastings in connection with promotional materials and activities of the Company. The Services Agreement also includes the obligation of Dr. Hastings to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information of the Company and to assign to the Company any and all inventions made or conceived by him during the term of the agreement and a covenant of Dr. Hastings not to compete with the Company.
Effective March 14, 2005, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Kreher. The initial term of the Agreement expires on December 31, 2007. Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Kreher is employed as Director of Special Projects for the Company on a part-time basis. Under the Agreement, he is required to perform services at the rate of approximately 20 hours per week during the term. Mr. Kreher’s compensation is at the rate of $20,833 per month through June 30, 2005 and at the rate of $10,417 per month for the remainder of the term of the Agreement. Under the Agreement, Mr. Kreher is permitted to perform services for other companies where such companies are not engaged in a conflicting business. However, in the Agreement, Mr. Kreher is prohibited, during the term of the Agreement and for a period of 36 months after expiration of the term, from providing services for a competing enterprise. The Agreement also includes the obligation of Mr. Kreher to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information of the Company.
Effective January 1, 2005, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Gibbons. The initial term of the Agreement expires on December 31, 2007. Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Gibbons is employed in an executive sales capacity for the Company on a part-time basis. Under the Agreement, he is required to perform services at the rate of approximately 10 hours per week during the term. Mr. Gibbon’s compensation will be set by the Company’s Board of Directors at the rate of at least $12,000 per month through the term of the Agreement. In addition, Mr. Gibbons will receive additional amounts of $2,000 for attendance at distributor meetings or conferences within the United States and $5,000 for attendance at such meetings outside of the United States. Under the Agreement, Mr. Gibbons is permitted to perform services for other companies where such companies are not engaged in a conflicting business. However, in the Agreement, Mr. Gibbons is prohibited, during the term of the Agreement and for a period of 36 months after expiration of the term, from providing services for a competing enterprise. The Agreement also includes the obligation of Mr. Gibbons to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information of the Company.
In March 1997, the Company entered into a Split Dollar Agreement with Steven G. Hastings, whereby the Company pays the premiums on life insurance policies covering his life. Upon the death of Mr. Hastings, the Company shall be entitled to receive the greater of (i) one-third of the insurance proceeds, (ii) the cash surrender value of the policy and (iii) the total premiums paid under the policy, with Mr. Hastings’ beneficiary receiving the balance of the insurance proceeds. On termination of the Agreement prior to Mr. Hastings’ death, he shall have the right to purchase the policy for the greater of (i) the cash surrender value of the policy and (ii) the total premiums paid under the policy.
18
In March 1997, the Company also entered into a Salary Continuation Plan Agreement with Steven G. Hastings. The Agreements provide for continuation of his salary upon termination of employment or retirement, after he has reached the age of 55 and has been employed by the Company for 15 years. Salary continuation payments are also made in the event Mr. Hastings is terminated prior to reaching these thresholds for other than cause as defined in the Agreements. Payments are to be made for a period of 10 years and the amount of the payments are based on Mr. Hastings’ age at the time of retirement or termination of employment.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Stephen M. Merrick is a Senior Vice President and director of the Company. Mr. Merrick is a principal of the law firm of Merrick & Associates, P.C. and has served as General Counsel to the Company and its subsidiaries since the founding of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the aggregate amounts paid or incurred by the Company to Merrick & Associates, P.C. and Stephen M. Merrick for services to the Company and its subsidiaries was $315,000.
During 2004, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 191,564 shares of Common Stock held by certain officers and directors of the Company for an aggregate purchase price of $1,293,980. The purchase price for each repurchase transaction was determined using a 5% discount to the closing market price per share on each respective repurchase date in order to approximate the dilutive impact of any corresponding sale on the open market. The terms and conditions of each repurchase transaction were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, excluding the vote of any interested director. The following table provides information regarding the aggregate repurchase transactions between the Company and each director or executive officer that occurred during 2004.
Name
| | Aggregate Number of Shares Repurchased (#)
| | Aggregate Purchase Price ($)
|
---|
| | | | |
Robert L. Montgomery | | 38,519 | | $ 305,806 |
| | | | |
David G. Kreher | | 8,934 | | $ 46,171 |
| | | | |
Carl W. Hastings | | 100,000 | | $ 722,000 |
| | |
| | | | |
Thomas T. Moody(1) | | 44,111 | | $ 220,004 |
|
| |
|
| | |
| | | | |
Total(2) | | 191,564 | | $1,293,980 |
|
| |
|
(1) | Mr. Moody was a director of the Company at the time of the repurchase transaction. |
(2) | The total aggregate purchase price has been adjusted due to rounding. | |
On two occasions during 2004, Sandra S. Montgomery exercised stock options to purchase an aggregate of 73,238 shares of the Company’s Common Stock and
19
realized an aggregate value of $524,306 based on the difference between the exercise price of the stock options and the closing market price on each date of exercise. The stock options were awarded to Mrs. Montgomery while she was a director of the Company. Mrs. Montgomery is the spouse of Robert L. Montgomery, Chief Executive Officer of the Company. R. Scott Montgomery is Senior Vice President of Worldwide Operations and was paid cash compensation in the amount of $215,500 for 2004 and Ryan A. Montgomery is Vice President – Sales and was paid cash compensation in the amount of $183,200 for 2004. Robert L. Montgomery is the father of R. Scott Montgomery and Ryan A. Montgomery. Ronald McCain is employed by the Company as a manager of the Company’s distributor service center and was paid cash compensation in the amount of $109,740 for 2004. Ronald McCain is the son of Donald L. McCain, a director of the Company, and the son-in-law of Robert L. Montgomery.
Compensation of Directors
Prior to June 1, 2004, Members of the Board of Directors who were not employees of the Company received $1,000 per attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees thereof. One member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company received compensation of $1,000 per month for his services and $2,000 per attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors or any Committees of the Board. If a Board member attends more than one meeting of the Board or Committee of the Board during the same month, the attendance fee is 150% of the basic attendance fee.
Effective June 1, 2004, the Board adopted a new policy under which the non-employee Board members are paid a monthly fee of $2,500 and $1,500 per attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors or any Committees of the Board. In 2004, no stock options were issued to any member of the Board of Directors. (See “Stock Ownership by Management and Others”).
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and with the NASDAQ Stock Market. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company, or written representations that no Form 5’s were required, the Company believes that during calendar year 2004, all of the officers, directors and ten percent beneficial owners of the Company complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its senior executive and financial officers. The Company’s Code of Ethics seeks to promote (1) honest and ethical
20
conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, (2) full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure of information to the Commission, (3) compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations, (4) prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to predesignated persons, and (5) accountability for adherence to the Code. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics has been attached to and can be viewed on the Company’s Internet website at http://www.reliv.com under the section entitled “Investor Relations.”
PROPOSAL TWO - SELECTION OF AUDITORS
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors has selected and approved Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the financial statements of the Company for 2005, subject to ratification by the stockholders. It is expected that a representative of the firm of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Fees Billed By Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table sets forth the amount of fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP for services rendered for the year:
| 2004 | | 2003 | |
---|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Audit Services (1) | | | $ | 558,597 | | $ | 212,500 | |
| Audit Related Services (2) | | | | 15,400 | | | 14,280 | |
| Tax Services (3) | | | | 169,309 | | | 64,200 | |
|
| |
| |
| Total Fees | | | $ | 743,306 | | $ | 290,980 | |
|
| |
| |
(1) | Includes the annual consolidated financial statement audit, limited quarterly reviews and statutory audits required internationally. In 2004, the amount also includes the audit of internal controls. |
(2) | Represents fees paid for the annual audit of the Company’s 401(k) Plan. | |
(3) | Primarily represents the preparation of tax returns and other tax compliance and consulting services. |
All audit, tax, and other services to be performed by Ernst & Young LLP for the Company must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews the description of the services and an estimate of the anticipated costs of performing those services. Services not previously approved cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Pre-approval is granted usually at regularly scheduled meetings. If unanticipated items arise between meetings of the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee has delegated approval authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, in which case the Chairman communicates such pre-
21
approvals to the full Committee at its next meeting. During 2004, all services performed by Ernst & Young LLP were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors reviews all relationships with Ernst & Young LLP, including the provision of non-audit services, which may relate to the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors considered the effect of Ernst & Young LLP’s non-audit services in assessing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and concluded that the provision of such services by Ernst & Young LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” SUCH RATIFICATION.
Stockholder Proposals for 2006 Proxy Statement
Proposals by stockholders for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement and form of Proxy relating to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is scheduled to be held on May 18, 2006, should be addressed to the Secretary, Reliv’ International, Inc., P.O. Box 405, Chesterfield, Missouri 63006, and must be received at such address no later than December 31, 2005. Upon receipt of any such proposal, the Company will determine whether or not to include such proposal in the Proxy Statement and Proxy in accordance with applicable law. It is suggested that such proposal be forwarded by certified mail, return receipt requested.
Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors
Stockholders of the Company may communicate with the Board of Directors in writing addressed to:
Board of Directors | |
c/o Corporate Secretary | |
Reliv International, Inc. | |
P.O. Box 405 | |
Chesterfield, Missouri 63006 |
| | | | |
The Secretary will review each communication from a stockholder. The Secretary will forward to the members of the Board of Directors of the Company each communication that (1) concerns the Company’s business or governance, (2) is not offensive and is legible in form and reasonably understandable in content, and (3) does not relate to a personal grievance against the Company or a team member or further a personal interest not shared by the other stockholders generally.
The Company strongly encourages each of its directors to attend each Annual Meeting of the Company’s stockholders where attendance does not unreasonably conflict with the director’s
22
other business and personal commitments. All of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors attended the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Other Matters to Be Acted Upon at the Meeting
The management of the Company knows of no other matters to be presented at the meeting. Should any other matter requiring a vote of the stockholders arise at the meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote the proxies in accordance with their best judgment.
BY ORDER OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Dated: April 19, 2005
Stephen M. Merrick, Secretary
23