UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 30, 2014 |
| OR |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ________ to ________ |
Commission File Number 001-34838
Hutchinson Technology Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota | | 41-0901840 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
40 West Highland Park Drive N.E. Hutchinson, Minnesota | | 55350 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(320) 587-3797 |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of April 30, 2014, the registrant had 28,054,117 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS – UNAUDITED
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)
| | March 30, 2014 | | | September 29, 2013 | |
ASSETS | |
Current assets: | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 2) | | $ | 39,036 | | | $ | 39,403 | |
Short-term investments restricted (Note 3) | | | 1,200 | | | | 1,200 | |
Trade receivables, net | | | 20,257 | | | | 21,680 | |
Other receivables | | | 2,034 | | | | 3,214 | |
Inventories | | | 51,044 | | | | 44,285 | |
Other current assets | | | 3,836 | | | | 6,383 | |
Total current assets | | | 117,407 | | | | 116,165 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 162,119 | | | | 186,914 | |
Other assets | | | 2,968 | | | | 3,596 | |
Total assets | | $ | 282,494 | | | $ | 306,675 | |
| |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of short- and long-term debt, net of discount (Note 6) | | $ | 40,217 | | | $ | 3,980 | |
Current portion of capital lease obligation | | | 2,027 | | | | 1,122 | |
Accounts payable | | | 17,588 | | | | 23,535 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 7,207 | | | | 6,066 | |
Accrued compensation | | | 11,095 | | | | 9,251 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 78,134 | | | | 43,954 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt, net of discount (Note 6) | | | 86,439 | | | | 123,023 | |
Capital lease obligation | | | 5,497 | | | | 2,968 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 2,081 | | | | 2,497 | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 28,054,000 and 27,581,000 issued and outstanding | | | 281 | | | | 276 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 432,522 | | | | 431,909 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (604 | ) | | | (148 | ) |
Accumulated loss | | | (321,856 | ) | | | (297,804 | ) |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | 110,343 | | | | 134,233 | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 282,494 | | | $ | 306,675 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements – unaudited.
HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS – UNAUDITED
(In thousands, except per share data)
| | Thirteen Weeks Ended | | | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |
| | March 30, 2014 | | | March 31, 2013 | | | March 30, 2014 | | | March 31, 2013 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 60,699 | | | $ | 60,930 | | | $ | 131,011 | | | $ | 124,629 | |
Cost of sales | | | 54,836 | | | | 52,953 | | | | 119,618 | | | | 109,231 | |
Gross profit | | | 5,863 | | | | 7,977 | | | | 11,393 | | | | 15,398 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development expenses | | | 4,389 | | | | 3,485 | | | | 8,331 | | | | 6,824 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 6,212 | | | | 6,216 | | | | 12,075 | | | | 12,382 | |
Severance and site consolidation expenses (Note 10) | | | 650 | | | | 332 | | | | 1,242 | | | | 1,350 | |
Asset impairment (Note 9) | | | – | | | | – | | | | 4,470 | | | | – | |
Loss from operations | | | (5,388 | ) | | | (2,056 | ) | | | (14,725 | ) | | | (5,158 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other income (expense), net | | | 656 | | | | 2,510 | | | | (2,417 | ) | | | 2,982 | |
Gain on extinguishment of long-term debt | | | – | | | | 4,986 | | | | – | | | | 4,986 | |
Interest income | | | 10 | | | | 12 | | | | 35 | | | | 62 | |
Interest expense | | | (3,959 | ) | | | (3,767 | ) | | | (7,736 | ) | | | (7,790 | ) |
Gain on short- and long-term investments | | | – | | | | 145 | | | | – | | | | 272 | |
(Loss) income before income taxes | | | (8,681 | ) | | | 1,830 | | | | (24,843 | ) | | | (4,646 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (Note 12) | | | 25 | | | | (37 | ) | | | (791 | ) | | | 9 | |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (8,706 | ) | | $ | 1,867 | | | $ | (24,052 | ) | | $ | (4,655 | ) |
Basic (loss) earnings per share | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | 0.07 | | | $ | (0.86 | ) | | $ | (0.19 | ) |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | 0.07 | | | $ | (0.86 | ) | | $ | (0.19 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding | | | 28,047 | | | | 25,319 | | | | 27,923 | | | | 24,635 | |
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding | | | 28,047 | | | | 26,555 | | | | 27,923 | | | | 24,635 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements – unaudited.
HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME – UNAUDITED
(In thousands)
| | Thirteen Weeks Ended | | | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |
| | March 30, 2014 | | | March 31, 2013 | | | March 30, 2014 | | | March 31, 2013 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (8,706 | ) | | $ | 1,867 | | | $ | (24,052 | ) | | $ | (4,655 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation, net of income taxes of $0 | | | 110 | | | | 485 | | | | (456 | ) | | | 545 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 110 | | | | 485 | | | | (456 | ) | | | 545 | |
Total comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (8,596 | ) | | $ | 2,352 | | | $ | (24,508 | ) | | $ | (4,110 | ) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements – unaudited.
HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – UNAUDITED
(In thousands)
| | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |
| | March 30, 2014 | | | March 31, 2013 | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (24,052 | ) | | $ | (4,655 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash (used for) provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 19,927 | | | | 19,817 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 592 | | | | 403 | |
Gain on short- and long-term investments | | | – | | | | (272 | ) |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | 76 | | | | 334 | |
Asset impairment charges (Note 9) | | | 4,470 | | | | – | |
Non-cash interest expense | | | 1,633 | | | | 1,820 | |
Gain on extinguishment of debt (Note 6) | | | – | | | | (4,986 | ) |
Severance and site consolidation expenses (Note 10) | | | 366 | | | | – | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | | (3,200 | ) | | | (10,308 | ) |
Cash (used for) provided by operating activities | | | (188 | ) | | | 2,153 | |
| | | | | | | | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | | (10,480 | ) | | | (12,655 | ) |
Proceeds from sale/leaseback of equipment | | | 6,395 | | | | 3,444 | |
Proceeds from sale of building and related assets | | | 4,364 | | | | – | |
Change in restricted cash | | | 1,549 | | | | 3,217 | |
Purchases of marketable securities | | | (1,200 | ) | | | (1,200 | ) |
Sales/maturities of marketable securities | | | 1,200 | | | | 1,464 | |
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities | | | 1,828 | | | | (5,730 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | 26 | | | | – | |
Repayments of capital lease | | | (732 | ) | | | (191 | ) |
Repayments of revolving credit line | | | (116,252 | ) | | | (115,808 | ) |
Proceeds from revolving credit line | | | 114,272 | | | | 118,097 | |
Repayments of debt | | | – | | | | (23,469 | ) |
Proceeds from private placement of debt | | | – | | | | 11,590 | |
Debt refinancing costs (Note 6) | | | – | | | | (359 | ) |
Cash used for financing activities | | | (2,686 | ) | | | (10,140 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 679 | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (367 | ) | | | (13,717 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 39,403 | | | | 53,653 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 39,036 | | | $ | 39,936 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow disclosure: | | | | | | | | |
Cash interest paid (net of amount capitalized) | | $ | 5,734 | | | $ | 6,304 | |
Income taxes paid | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 30 | |
Assets acquired through capital lease | | $ | 4,372 | | | $ | 4,148 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements – unaudited.HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – UNAUDITED
(Columnar dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
When we refer to “we,” “our,” “us,” the “company” or “HTI,” we mean Hutchinson Technology Incorporated and its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise indicated, references to “2014” mean our fiscal year ending September 28, 2014, references to “2013” mean our fiscal year ended September 29, 2013 and references to “2012” mean our fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.
(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by us, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information furnished in the condensed consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of our management, necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, we suggest that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K. The quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that may occur for the entire fiscal year.
(2) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
As of March 30, 2014, and September 29, 2013, we had $2,172,000 and $3,721,000, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents that were restricted in use, which are classified in other current assets. These amounts covered outstanding letters of credit and cash received and temporarily held in our senior secured credit facility collections account.
(3) INVESTMENTS
A summary of our investments is as follows:
| | March 30, 2014 | | | September 29, 2013 | |
Available-for-sale securities | | | | | | |
U.S government debt securities | | $ | 1,200 | | | $ | 1,200 | |
Our short-term investments are comprised of United States government debt securities. Unrealized gains and losses deemed to be temporary on available-for-sale securities are reported as other comprehensive loss within shareholders’ equity.
As of March 30, 2014, our short-term investments were scheduled to mature within one year.
As of March 30, 2014, and September 29, 2013, we had $1,200,000 and $1,200,000, respectively, of short-term investments that were restricted in use. The amounts are required by the State of Minnesota to be held as security for our self-insured workers compensation programs.
(4) TRADE RECEIVABLES
We grant credit to our customers, but generally do not require collateral or any other security to support amounts due. Trade receivables of $20,257,000 at March 30, 2014, and $21,680,000 at September 29, 2013, are net of allowances of $392,000 and $656,000, respectively. As of March 30, 2014, the allowance of $392,000 consisted of a $10,000 allowance for doubtful accounts and a $382,000 allowance for sales returns. The allowance at September 29, 2013 of $656,000 was for sales returns.
We generally warrant that the products sold by us will be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one year or less following delivery to our customer. Upon determination that the products sold are defective, we typically accept the return of such products and refund the purchase price to our customer. We record a provision against revenue for estimated returns on sales of our products in the same period that the related revenues are recognized. We base the allowance on historical product returns, as well as existing product return authorizations. The following table reconciles the changes in our allowance for sales returns under warranties:
September 29, 2013 | | Increases in the Allowance Related to Warranties Issued | | Reductions in the Allowance for Returns Under Warranties | | March 30, 2014 |
$656 | | $592 | | ($866) | | $382 |
(5) INVENTORIES
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market by analyzing market conditions, current sales prices, inventory costs and inventory balances. Inventories consisted of the following at March 30, 2014, and September 29, 2013:
| | March 30, 2014 | | | September 29, 2013 | |
| | | | | | |
Raw materials | | $ | 19,494 | | | $ | 18,608 | |
Work in process | | | 12,222 | | | | 9,306 | |
Finished goods | | | 19,328 | | | | 16,371 | |
| | $ | 51,044 | | | $ | 44,285 | |
(6) SHORT- AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Short- and long-term debt consisted of the following at March 30, 2014, and September 29, 2013:
| | March 30, 2014 | | | September 29, 2013 | |
| | | | | | |
8.50% Convertible Notes | | $ | 39,822 | | | $ | 39,822 | |
8.50% Convertible Notes debt discount | | | (1,605 | ) | | | (2,535 | ) |
8.50% Secured Notes | | | 78,931 | | | | 78,931 | |
8.50% Secured Notes debt discount | | | (4,234 | ) | | | (4,870 | ) |
10.875% Notes | | | 12,200 | | | | 12,200 | |
10.875% Notes debt discount | | | (458 | ) | | | (525 | ) |
Credit Facility | | | 2,000 | | | | 3,980 | |
Total short- and long-term debt, net of discounts | | | 126,656 | | | | 127,003 | |
Less: Current maturities, net of discounts | | | (40,217 | ) | | | (3,980 | ) |
Total long-term debt, net of discounts | | $ | 86,439 | | | $ | 123,023 | |
8.50% Convertible Notes
We currently have outstanding $39,822,000 aggregate principal amount of 8.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (the “8.50% Convertible Notes”), which as of March 30, 2014 was classified as current on our consolidated balance sheets. The 8.50% Convertible Notes were issued in February 2011 as part of a tender/exchange pursuant to an indenture dated as of February 11, 2011. The 8.50% Convertible Notes are senior in right of payment to any of our existing and future subordinated indebtedness. Interest at a rate of 8.50% per annum is payable on the 8.50% Convertible Notes on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The 8.50% Convertible Notes mature on January 15, 2026. Each $1,000 principal amount of the 8.50% Convertible Notes is convertible into 116.2790 shares of our common stock (which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $8.60 per share), subject to adjustment.
We have the right to redeem the 8.50% Convertible Notes (i) on or after January 15, 2013, to, but excluding, January 15, 2015, if the closing price of our common stock equals or exceeds 150% of the conversion price, and (ii) at any time on or after January 15, 2015, in either case in whole or in part, for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 8.50% Convertible Notes to be redeemed plus any accrued but unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. Holders of the 8.50% Convertible Notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their 8.50% Convertible Notes at par on each of January 15, 2015, January 15, 2016, and January 15, 2021, for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 8.50% Convertible Notes to be repurchased plus any accrued but unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date. If a fundamental change (as defined in the indenture) occurs, each holder of 8.50% Convertible Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or any portion of that holder’s 8.50% Convertible Notes for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 8.50% Convertible Notes to be repurchased plus any accrued but unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.
In July 2011, we completed an exchange for a portion of our outstanding 3.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2026 (the “3.25% Notes”). In connection with the July 2011 exchange, we issued $45,170,000 aggregate principal amount of the 8.50% Convertible Notes and made aggregate cash payments of $3,091,000 in exchange for $45,963,000 aggregate principal amount of the 3.25% Notes.
In April 2012, after funding the purchase of 3.25% Notes through the 3.25% Tender/Exchange Offer (as described below), we completed an offer to purchase for cash $26,666,000 aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 8.50% Convertible Notes, whereby we applied $19,999,500 of residual proceeds from a private placement of 8.50% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2017 (the “8.50% Secured Notes”) to fund the purchase of outstanding 8.50% Convertible Notes.
In January 2013, we repurchased $18,682,000 aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 8.50% Convertible Notes by making cash payments totaling $11,583,000, plus accrued and unpaid interest, which payments were funded by the proceeds of the sale of our 10.875% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2017 (the “10.875% Notes”). Applying debt extinguishment accounting, we recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $4,986,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013. These transactions reduced the portion of our outstanding debt subject to a holder-initiated repurchase as early as 2015 from $58,504,000 to $39,822,000.
8.50% Secured Notes
In March 2012, we issued $78,931,000 aggregate principal amount of 8.50% Secured Notes. Of that total amount, $38,931,000 aggregate principal amount of 8.50% Secured Notes was issued pursuant to an effective registration statement relating to an offer to purchase for cash or exchange for new securities any and all of our outstanding 3.25% Notes (the “3.25% Tender/Exchange Offer”). The remaining $40,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 8.50% Secured Notes was issued in a private placement that included the issuance of warrants to purchase 3,869,000 shares of our common stock. The warrants were exercisable on a cashless basis for $.01 per share for ten years after their issuance. The total purchase price for the 8.50% Secured Notes and warrants issued in the private placement was $39,400,000. The fair value of the warrants was recorded in additional paid-in capital in the amount of $8,489,000. As of May 2013, all 3,869,000 warrants had been exercised and there were no warrants outstanding.
The 8.50% Secured Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.50% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning July 15, 2012, and mature on January 15, 2017, unless redeemed or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The 8.50% Secured Notes are secured by liens on all assets securing our existing or future senior secured credit facilities (other than certain excluded assets), which liens rank junior in priority to any liens securing our senior secured credit facilities and other permitted priority liens.
We may redeem all or part of the 8.50% Secured Notes at any time by paying 100% of the principal amount redeemed, plus a make-whole premium (and accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount redeemed to) as of the date of redemption (subject to the rights of holders of the 8.50% Secured Notes on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date as and to the extent provided in the indenture). The indenture governing the 8.50% Secured Notes contains certain covenants that, among other things, will limit our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments, enter into agreements that restrict distributions from restricted subsidiaries, sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries, enter into transactions with affiliates, create or incur liens and enter into operating leases.
10.875% Notes
On January 22, 2013, we issued $12,200,000 aggregate principal amount of the 10.875% Notes for a total purchase price of $11,590,000. The 10.875% Notes were issued in a private placement pursuant to an indenture dated as of January 22, 2013, and bear interest at a rate of 10.875% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning July 15, 2013. The 10.875% Notes are secured by liens on all assets securing our senior secured credit facilities (other than capital stock of subsidiaries of our company to the extent that inclusion of such capital stock would require the filing of separate financial statements for such subsidiaries with the SEC), which liens rank junior in priority to the liens securing our senior secured credit facilities and other permitted priority liens and on an equal and ratable basis with the liens securing our 8.50% Secured Notes. The 10.875% Notes are scheduled to mature on January 15, 2017, unless redeemed or repurchased in accordance with their terms. We may redeem all or a portion of the 10.875% Notes at any time by paying 100% of the principal amount redeemed, plus a make-whole premium as of, and accrued and unpaid interest to, the date of redemption.
To accommodate the January 2013 debt transactions described above, on January 22, 2013, we entered into (i) a first supplemental indenture to the indenture dated as of March 30, 2012, which governs the 8.50% Secured Notes, and (ii) a consent and third amendment to our revolving credit and security agreement.
Debt refinancing costs of $359,000 were capitalized and are being amortized over four years or until the maturity date. The amortization expense is included in interest expense.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
In September 2011, we entered into a revolving credit and security agreement with PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”). The credit agreement provides us with a senior secured credit facility in a principal amount of up to $35,000,000, subject to a borrowing base. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of the personal and real property of Hutchinson Technology Incorporated. The maturity date of the credit facility is October 1, 2014. The credit agreement contains certain financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), and minimum liquidity. We maintain an account at PNC Bank with a minimum balance of $15,000,000, as required under the credit agreement.
In February 2012, we entered into a consent and amendment to our credit agreement with PNC Bank, which itself was further amended in March 2012. Under the amended consent and amendment, PNC Bank consented to our use of the proceeds from the private placement of 8.50% Secured Notes to purchase a portion of our outstanding 8.50% Convertible Notes.
In July 2012, we entered into a second amendment to our credit agreement with PNC Bank. The amendment modified certain of the financial covenants under the existing agreement to (i) eliminate the fixed charge coverage ratio requirement for our fiscal quarters ended June 24, 2012, and September 30, 2012, and provide for aggregating the applicable measurement periods starting with our fiscal quarter ended December 30, 2012, and (ii) implement an additional EBITDA requirement for 2012.
In January 2013, we entered into a consent and third amendment to our credit agreement with PNC Bank. Under the consent and amendment, PNC Bank consented to the January 2013 debt transactions, including the private placement and the repurchases, and the granting of the liens to secure the 10.875% Notes.
In October 2013, we entered into a waiver and fourth amendment to our credit agreement with PNC Bank. The amendment modified the financial covenants, as previously amended, to eliminate the compliance requirement for our fourth quarter ended September 29, 2013, and change the measurement periods and adjust the financial covenants starting with our first quarter ended December 29, 2013, by excluding from such measurement periods all fiscal quarters ended on or prior to September 29, 2013. With this waiver and amendment in place, we were in compliance with the terms, provisions and financial covenants of our credit agreement as of September 29, 2013.
From time to time, we borrow funds under the senior secured credit facility. As of March 30, 2014, we had $2,000,000 outstanding. Our average amount outstanding for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, was $2,247,000. Amounts borrowed under the credit facility bear cash interest at a reduced rate equal to, at our election, either (i) PNC Bank’s alternate base rate plus 1.0% per annum, or (ii) LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum if no defaults or events of default exist under the credit agreement. As of March 30, 2014, we were in compliance with the covenants of our credit facility.
(7) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Commitments
We have commitments under various capital and operating lease agreements. Assets acquired under capital leases are depreciated over the useful life of the asset.
The future minimum lease payments for all capital and operating leases as of March 30, 2014, are as follows:
| | Capital Leases | | | Operating Leases | |
2014 | | $ | 1,213 | | | $ | 912 | |
2015 | | | 2,416 | | | | 1,200 | |
2016 | | | 2,037 | | | | 657 | |
2017 | | | 1,887 | | | | 54 | |
Thereafter | | | 753 | �� | | | – | |
Total future minimum lease payments | | | 8,306 | | | | 2,823 | |
Less: Interest | | | (782 | ) | | | – | |
Total future minimum lease payments excluding interest | | $ | 7,524 | | | $ | 2,823 | |
Legal Proceedings
We and certain users of our products have from time to time received, and may in the future receive, communications from third parties asserting patents against us or our customers which may relate to certain of our manufacturing equipment or products or to products that include our products as a component. In addition, certain of our customers have been sued on patents having claims closely related to products sold by us. If any third party makes a valid infringement claim and a license was not available on terms acceptable to us, our operating results could be adversely affected. We expect that, as the number of patents issued continues to increase, and as we grow, the volume of intellectual property claims could increase. We may need to engage in litigation to enforce patents issued or licensed to us, protect trade secrets or know-how owned by us or determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the intellectual property rights of others. We could incur substantial costs in such litigation or other similar legal actions, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are a party from time to time to ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business. The outcome of such claims, if, any, is not expected to materially affect our current or future financial position or results of operations.
(8) ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
Other comprehensive (loss) income refers to revenue, expenses, gains and losses that are recorded as an element of shareholders’ equity but are excluded from net income. Our other comprehensive (loss) income is comprised of unrealized gains and losses on foreign translation adjustments.
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax (see Note 12 for a discussion of income taxes), was as follows:
| | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | |
Balance as of September 29, 2013 | | $ | (148 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss | | | (456 | ) |
Balance as of March 30, 2014 | | $ | (604 | ) |
| | | | |
Balance as of September 30, 2012 | | $ | (129 | ) |
Other comprehensive income | | | 545 | |
Balance as of March 31, 2013 | | $ | 416 | |
(9) ASSET IMPAIRMENT
When indicators of impairment exist and assets are held for use, we estimate future undiscounted cash flows attributable to the assets. In the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded value of the assets, the assets are written down to their estimated fair values based on the expected discounted future cash flows attributable to the assets or based on appraisals. Factors affecting impairment of assets held for use include the ability of the specific assets to generate positive cash flows. Changes in any of these factors or changes in our forecast model estimates could necessitate impairment recognition in future periods for other assets held for use.
Late in December 2012, we decided to further consolidate and streamline our U.S. operations. We are vacating the portion of our Eau Claire, Wisconsin facility used for assembly operations by moving the equipment to other available space and as we shift more assembly production to our Thailand operation. In Hutchinson, we are consolidating our Development Center into our headquarters building, taking advantage of the space made available by moving component manufacturing from Hutchinson to Eau Claire in 2011. We are also in the process of moving our stamping operation from a facility we currently lease in Plymouth, Minnesota, to our headquarters building in Hutchinson, Minnesota. We believe that the decision to consolidate operations was a triggering event that required us to perform an impairment analysis to evaluate the recoverability of the carrying value of our long-lived assets. Our impairment analysis for the first quarter of 2013 indicated that no charge for impairment was required.
In connection with this consolidation of our operations, two of our facilities were offered for sale or lease, including the Eau Claire, Wisconsin assembly building and the Development Center building on our Hutchinson, Minnesota campus. During the first quarter of 2014, we received third-party interest in purchasing the Eau Claire assembly building. Based on the discussions regarding the potential sale of this building, we modified our forecast model to increase the probability of a sale of our Eau Claire assembly building and decrease the probability of a lease. Using these new weightings for sale and lease, the carrying value of our assets exceeded the expected undiscounted cash flows indicating a trigger of potential impairment. As a result, we evaluated the recoverability of the Eau Claire assembly building based on these circumstances and recorded an impairment charge of $4,470,000 included in the line item “Asset impairment” in our consolidated statement of operations. The building and related assets had remaining useful lives ranging from 15 to 30 years. We determined the long-lived assets did not meet the criteria to be classified as assets held for sale.
During the second quarter of 2014, we sold the Eau Claire, Wisconsin assembly building, and related real and personal property for net proceeds of $4,364,000. We will continue to own and operate the remaining portion of the Eau Claire facility, representing approximately 700,000 square feet of floor space.
(10) SEVERANCE AND SITE CONSOLIDATION EXPENSES
A summary of our severance and site consolidation expenses as of March 30, 2014, is as follows:
| | Severance | | | Site Consolidation Expenses | | | Total | |
Accrual balances, September 30, 2012 | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | |
Restructuring charges | | | 1,018 | | | | – | | | | 1,018 | |
Cash payments | | | (631 | ) | | | – | | | | (631 | ) |
Accrual balances, December 30, 2012 | | | 387 | | | | – | | | | 387 | |
Restructuring charges | | | 194 | | | | 138 | | | | 332 | |
Cash payments | | | (581 | ) | | | (138 | ) | | | (719 | ) |
Accrual balances, March 31, 2013 | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Restructuring charges | | | – | | | | 638 | | | | 638 | |
Cash payments | | | – | | | | (638 | ) | | | (638 | ) |
Accrual balances, June 30, 2013 | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Restructuring charges | | | – | | | | 885 | | | | 885 | |
Cash payments | | | – | | | | (885 | ) | | | (885 | ) |
Accrual balances, September 29, 2013 | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Restructuring charges | | | – | | | | 592 | | | | 592 | |
Cash payments | | | – | | | | (592 | ) | | | (592 | ) |
Accrual balances, December 29, 2013 | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Restructuring charges | | | 366 | | | | 284 | | | | 650 | |
Cash payments | | | – | | | | (284 | ) | | | (284 | ) |
Accrual balances, March 30, 2014 | | $ | 366 | | | $ | – | | | $ | 366 | |
During the first quarter of 2013, we identified approximately 55 positions to be eliminated as part of our continued focus on overall cost reduction. This resulted in $1,212,000 of severance expense during the first and second quarters of 2013.
During the second quarter of 2014, as part of shutting down our Eau Claire, Wisconsin assembly operations and our continued consolidation efforts, we identified approximately 70 positions to be eliminated. This resulted in an estimated $366,000 of severance expense that will be paid during the third and fourth quarters of 2014. As of March 30, 2014, the severance had not yet been paid.
In connection with the consolidation of our operations, as discussed above, we incurred site consolidation expenses of $1,661,000 during 2013 and $876,000 during the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014. The site consolidation expenses consist primarily of internal labor and contractors.
(11) OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Transaction gains and losses that arise from the exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in a currency other than the local currency are included in “Other income (expense), net” in our consolidated statements of operations. For the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, we recognized a foreign currency gain of $576,000 and a foreign currency loss of $2,594,000, respectively. For the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013, we recognized a foreign currency gain of $1,980,000 and $2,118,000, respectively. These were primarily related to U.S. dollar-denominated inter-company liabilities owed to us by our Thai subsidiary.
(12) INCOME TAXES
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be realized based on future taxable income, and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change this allowance in a period, we must include an expense or a benefit within the tax provision in our consolidated statements of operations.
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets. Valuation allowances arise due to the uncertainty of realizing deferred tax assets. At September 29, 2013, we had a valuation allowance of $213,948,000. We assess whether valuation allowances should be established against our deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available evidence, using a “more likely than not” standard. In making such assessments, significant weight is to be given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Our current or previous losses are given more weight than our future outlook. Our three-year historical cumulative loss was a significant negative factor. This loss, combined with uncertain near-term market and economic conditions, reduced our ability to rely on our projections of future taxable income in determining whether a valuation allowance was appropriate. Accordingly, we concluded that a full valuation allowance was appropriate. We will continue to assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be realizable, and our valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly, which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.
The income tax benefit for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, was $791,000, compared to the income tax provision of $9,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013. For the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, we recognized an $859,000 benefit due to reserves for certain tax refunds that were released due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.
(13) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan has been approved by shareholders and authorizes the issuance of 1,200,000 shares of our common stock (plus any shares that remained available on that date for future grants under our 1996 Incentive Plan) for equity-based awards (no further awards will be made under our 1996 Incentive Plan). Under the equity incentive plans, stock options have been granted to employees, including our officers, and to our directors, at an exercise price not less than the fair market value of our common stock at the date the options are granted. The options granted generally expire ten years from the date of grant or at an earlier date as determined by the committee of our board of directors that administers the plans. Options granted under the plans prior to November 2005 generally were exercisable one year from the date of grant. Options granted under the plans from November 2005 to October 2011 are exercisable two to three years from the date of grant. Options granted under the plans since November 2011 are exercisable one to three years from the date of grant.
Under our equity incentive plan, we also have issued restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to employees, including our officers. RSUs generally vest over three years in annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant. We recognize compensation expense for the RSUs over the service period equal to the fair market value of the RSUs on the date of issuance. Upon vesting, RSUs convert to shares in accordance with the terms of the equity incentive plan under which they were issued.
We recorded stock-based compensation expense related to our stock options, RSUs and common stock, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, of $224,000 and $314,000 for the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2014, and March 31, 2013, respectively; and $592,000 and $403,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, and March 31, 2013, respectively. As of March 30, 2014, $2,432,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 22 months.
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the weighted-average fair value of options. The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, and March 31, 2013, was $2.34 and $1.27, respectively. The fair value of options at the date of grant and the weighted-average assumptions utilized to determine such values are indicated in the following table:
| | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |
| | March 30, 2014 | | | March 31, 2013 | |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 2.3 | % | | | 1.3 | % |
Expected volatility | | | 80.0 | % | | | 80.0 | % |
Expected life (in years) | | | 8.0 | | | | 8.0 | |
Dividend yield | | | – | | | | – | |
The risk-free interest rate is based on a treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of our stock options. We considered historical data in projecting expected stock price volatility. We estimated the expected life of stock options and stock option forfeitures based on historical experience.
Option transactions during the twenty-six weeks ended March 30 2014, are summarized as follows:
| | Number of Shares | | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price ($) | | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (yrs.) | |
Outstanding at September 29, 2013 | | | 3,168,924 | | | 12.15 | | | | 5.5 | |
Granted | | | 340,000 | | | 3.06 | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (10,334 | ) | | 2.45 | | | | | |
Expired/Canceled | | | (199,760 | ) | | 29.46 | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 30, 2014 | | | 3,298,830 | | | 10.20 | | | | 5.7 | |
Options exercisable at March 30, 2014 | | | 2,673,265 | | | 12.01 | | | | 4.9 | |
The aggregate intrinsic value at March 30, 2014, of our stock options (the amount by which the market price of the stock on the date of exercise exceeded the exercise price of the option) outstanding was $651,000. The aggregate intrinsic value of our stock options exercisable at March 30, 2014, was $349,000.
The following table summarizes the status of options that remain subject to vesting:
| | Number of Shares | | | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value ($) | | | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (yrs.) | |
Non-vested at September 29, 2013 | | | 819,685 | | | 1.59 | | | 8.3 | |
Granted | | | 340,000 | | | 2.34 | | | | |
Vested | | | (523,286 | ) | | 1.75 | | | | |
Canceled | | | (10,834 | ) | | 1.84 | | | | |
Non-vested at March 30, 2014 | | | 625,565 | | | 1.86 | | | 9.1 | |
The following table summarizes information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable stock options:
| | | | Options Outstanding | | | Options Exercisable | |
Range of Exercise Prices ($) | | Number Outstanding | | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (yrs.) | | | Weighted-Average Price ($) | | | Number Exercisable | | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price ($) | |
1.45 | - | 3.00 | | | 912,387 | | | 8.8 | | | 2.12 | | | | 316,822 | | | 1.65 | |
3.01 | - | 5.00 | | | 893,635 | | | 6.1 | | | 3.06 | | | | 863,635 | | | 3.04 | |
5.01 | - | 10.00 | | | 546,933 | | | 5.7 | | | 7.33 | | | | 546,933 | | | 7.33 | |
10.01 | - | 45.06 | | | 945,875 | | | 2.4 | | | 26.38 | | | | 945,875 | | | 26.38 | |
| Total | | | | 3,298,830 | | | 5.7 | | | 10.20 | | | | 2,673,265 | | | 12.01 | |
RSU transactions during the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, are summarized as follows:
| | Number of RSUs | | | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value ($) | |
Non-vested at September 29, 2013 | | | 983,058 | | | 1.59 | |
Granted | | | 346,750 | | | 2.98 | |
Vested | | | (454,810 | ) | | 1.52 | |
Canceled | | | (7,649 | ) | | 1.63 | |
Non-vested at March 30, 2014 | | | 867,349 | | | 2.18 | |
(14) STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On February 4, 2008, we announced that our board of directors had approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to spend up to $130,000,000 to repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, of which, we had spent $57,632,000 to repurchase 3,600,000 shares. The board of directors terminated the plan on October 9, 2013.
(15) (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic (loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted (loss) earnings per share identifies the dilutive effect of potential common shares using net (loss) income available to common shareholders and is computed using the treasury stock method for outstanding stock options and the if-converted method for the 8.50% Convertible Notes, and (ii) in accordance with FASB guidance relating to the effect of contingently convertible instruments on diluted earnings per share for the 3.25% Notes. As of March 31, 2013 there were no 3.25% Notes outstanding. A reconciliation of these amounts is as follows:
| | Thirteen Weeks Ended | | | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |
| | March 30, 2014 | | | March 31, 2013 | | | March 30, 2014 | | | March 31, 2013 | |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (8,706 | ) | | $ | 1,867 | | | $ | (24,052 | ) | | $ | (4,655 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding | | | 28,047 | | | | 25,319 | | | | 27,923 | | | | 24,635 | |
Dilutive potential common shares | | | – | | | | 1,236 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Weighted-average common and diluted shares outstanding | | | 28,047 | | | | 26,555 | | | | 27,923 | | | | 24,635 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic (loss) earnings per share | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | 0.07 | | | $ | (0.86 | ) | | $ | (0.19 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | 0.07 | | | $ | (0.86 | ) | | $ | (0.19 | ) |
Diluted loss per share for the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2014, excludes potential common shares of 532,000 using the treasury stock method, and 4,630,000 using the if-converted method for the 8.50% Convertible Notes, as they were anti-dilutive. Diluted earnings per share for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2013, includes potential common shares and warrants of 1,236,000 using the treasury stock method. Diluted earnings per share for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2013, excludes potential common shares of 5,156,000 using the if-converted method for the 8.50% Convertible Notes, as they were anti-dilutive. Diluted loss per share for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, excludes potential common shares of 489,000 using the treasury stock method, and 4,630,000 using the if-converted method for the 8.50% Convertible Notes, as they were anti-dilutive. Diluted loss per share for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013, excludes potential common shares and warrants of 1,088,000 using the treasury stock method, and 5,979,000 using the if-converted method for the 8.50% Convertible Notes, as they were anti-dilutive.
As discussed in Note 6, we issued warrants to purchase 3,869,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement. As of May 2013, all 3,869,000 warrants had been exercised and there were no warrants outstanding.
(16) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Financial assets and liabilities that are remeasured and reported at fair value at each reporting period are classified and disclosed in one of the following three levels:
Level 1 – | Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
Level 2 – | Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are inactive; quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; or |
Level 3 – | Inputs that are unobservable for the asset or liability and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
The following tables present our assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 30, 2014, and September 29, 2013:
| | Fair Value Measurements at March 30, 2014 | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 39,036 | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | 39,036 | |
Available-for-sale securities | | | 1,200 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,200 | |
Total assets | | $ | 40,236 | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | 40,236 | |
| | Fair Value Measurements at September 29, 2013 | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 39,403 | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | 39,403 | |
Available-for-sale securities | | | 1,200 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,200 | |
Total assets | | $ | 40,603 | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | 40,603 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less. The carrying value of these cash equivalents approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities.
Available-for-Sale Securities
Our available-for-sale securities are comprised of United States government debt securities. The fair value is based on quoted market prices in active markets.
Short- and Long-Term Debt
The fair values of our 8.50% Convertible Notes and our 8.50% Secured Notes were determined based on the closing market price of the respective Notes as of the end of the fiscal quarter.
Our 10.875% Notes have not experienced trading activity; therefore the fair value estimate was based on the closing market prices of comparable debt as of the end of the fiscal quarter. The fair value of the 10.875% Notes was classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of the PNC Bank credit facility’s carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
The estimated fair values of our short- and long-term debt were as follows on each of the indicated dates:
| | March 30, 2014 | | | September 29, 2013 | |
| | Carrying Amount | | | Fair Value | | | Carrying Amount | | | Fair Value | |
8.50% Convertible Notes | | $ | 39,822 | | | $ | 37,433 | | | $ | 39,822 | | | $ | 38,357 | |
8.50% Secured Notes | | | 78,931 | | | | 74,491 | | | | 78,931 | | | | 72,222 | |
10.875% Notes | | | 12,200 | | | | 13,172 | | | | 12,200 | | | | 12,909 | |
Credit Facility | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,000 | | | | 3,980 | | | | 3,980 | |
(17) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
We evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. We did not identify any additional material events or transactions occurring during this subsequent event reporting period that required further recognition or disclosure in these consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
When we refer to “we,” “our,” “us,” the “company” or “HTI,” we mean Hutchinson Technology Incorporated and its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise indicated, references to “2014” mean our fiscal year ending September 28, 2014, references to “2013” mean our fiscal year ended September 29, 2013, and references to “2012” mean our fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the MD&A included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 29, 2013.
GENERAL
Our Company
Hutchinson Technology is a global technology leader committed to creating value by developing solutions to critical customer problems. As a key worldwide supplier of suspension assemblies for disk drives, our products help customers improve overall disk drive performance and meet the demands of an ever-expanding digital universe.
Our culture of quality, continuous improvement, superior innovation and a relentless focus on the fundamentals enables us to compete in the markets we serve.
General Business
The majority of our revenue is derived from the sale of suspension assemblies to a small number of manufacturers. Suspension assemblies are precise electro-mechanical components that hold a disk drive’s read/write head at microscopic distances above the drive’s disks.
Sales to our four largest customers constituted 97% of net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, as shown in the following table.
Customer | | Percentage of Sales |
Western Digital Corporation | | | 60 | % |
Seagate Technology, LLC | | | 17 | % |
SAE Magnetics, Ltd/TDK Corporation | | | 15 | % |
HGST (a Western Digital company) | | | 5 | % |
Significant portions of our revenue may be indirectly attributable to large manufacturers of disk drives, such as Western Digital, which may purchase read/write head assemblies that utilize our suspension assemblies from SAE Magnetics, Ltd/TDK Corporation. We expect to continue to depend on a limited number of customers for our sales, given the small number of disk drive manufacturers and head-gimbal assemblers. Our results of operations could be adversely affected by reduced demand from a major customer.
The following table sets forth our recent quarterly suspension assembly shipment quantities in millions for the periods indicated:
| | Suspension Assembly Shipments by Quarter | | | | |
| | 2013 | | | 2014 | |
| | First | | | Second | | | Third | | | Fourth | | | First | | | Second | |
Suspension assembly shipment quantities | | | 104 | | | | 99 | | | | 99 | | | | 103 | | | | 116 | | | | 102 | |
Our suspension assembly shipments totaled 116 million in the first quarter of 2014, up 13% compared with 103 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. The increase was primarily due to suspension assembly demand for 2.5” mobile drives that was particularly strong during the first quarter of 2014. In the second quarter of 2014, suspension assembly shipments decreased to 102 million. The decrease was due to weakness in the enterprise segment, which utilizes a higher number of suspensions per drive, slower-than-expected ramps on certain new customer programs and seasonally weak demand.
Average selling price was $0.57 for the second quarter of 2014, $0.59 for the first quarter of 2014 and $0.60 for the fourth quarter of 2013. The decline in the second quarter of 2014 resulted from certain dual-stage actuated (“DSA”) suspension assemblies transitioning to high-volume pricing, coupled with a slower-than-expected shift in product mix toward more DSA products. Shipments of DSA suspensions, which carry a higher selling price and cost more to manufacture, accounted for 24% of our second quarter 2014 shipments and 23% of both our first quarter 2014 and our fourth quarter 2013 shipments.
Gross profit in the second quarter of 2014 was $5,863,000, or 10% of net sales, compared with $5,530,000, or 8% of net sales, in the first quarter of 2014. Both represent increases from a $372,000 gross loss in the fourth quarter of 2013. Gross profit in the first quarter of 2014 benefited from the higher shipment volume in that quarter and from improved manufacturing yields at our Thailand assembly operation and from our components processes. Gross profit in the second quarter of 2014 improved as we leveraged our capacity to build inventory that will be used to facilitate the transfer of additional production to our Thailand plant. We also further improved yields at our Thailand and U.S. assembly operations and in our TSA+ process. Our Thailand operation accounted for 55% of our assembly production during the second quarter of 2014, up from 52% in the first quarter of 2014. In the third quarter of 2014, we expect our Thailand operation will account for approximately 60-65% of our total assembly production.
As part of our continued consolidation efforts, we have moved most of our Development Center operations to our headquarters building. The Development Center building is currently offered for sale or lease. We are also in the process of moving our stamping operation from a facility we currently lease in Plymouth, Minnesota, to our headquarters building in Hutchinson, Minnesota. In total, we incurred site consolidation expenses of $1,661,000 during 2013 and $876,000 during the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014. The site consolidation expenses consist primarily of internal labor and contractors. We expect to complete the consolidation of our U.S operations by the end of 2014.
During the second quarter of 2014, we sold our Eau Claire, Wisconsin assembly building, and related real and personal property for net proceeds of $4,364,000. We will continue to own and operate the remaining portion of the Eau Claire facility, representing approximately 700,000 square feet of floor space. As part of the Eau Claire, Wisconsin assembly shutdown and our continued consolidation efforts, we also identified approximately 70 positions to be eliminated at this location. This resulted in an estimated $366,000 of severance expense that will be paid during the third and fourth quarters of 2014. As of March 30, 2014, the severance had not yet been paid.
Despite near-term weakness in demand, we continue to believe we are well positioned with our key customers and that should translate into increased demand. As part of our ongoing effort to be the industry’s lowest cost producer of suspension assemblies, we will continue to strengthen our competitive position by advancing our DSA products and further improving our progress toward our manufacturing yield and efficiency targets. In addition, we are not yet realizing the full benefits related to the shift of assembly manufacturing to our Thailand plant and the consolidation of our U.S. operations. These benefits will become more significant to our financial performance in the latter part of calendar 2014.
Outlook
We expect suspension assembly shipments in the historically weaker third quarter of 2014 to be relatively flat with the second quarter of 2014. Our average selling price is expected to be relatively flat before rising slightly in the fourth quarter of 2014 as DSA suspensions become a higher percentage of our shipments. As a result of a planned decrease in production volumes, we expect our third quarter of 2014 gross profit to decline compared to our second quarter of 2014 gross profit.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Thirteen Weeks Ended March 30, 2014 vs. Thirteen Weeks Ended March 31, 2013
Net sales for the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2014, were $60,699,000, compared to $60,930,000 for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $231,000. Suspension assembly shipments increased slightly but were offset by a decrease in our average selling price.
Gross profit for the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2014, was $5,863,000, compared to gross profit of $7,977,000 for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $2,114,000. Gross profit was 10% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2014, compared to 13% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2013. Although suspension assembly shipments increased slightly, the decline in gross profit was due to higher variable costs due to shipping a higher mix of DSA product and product that uses purchased flexures. Both quarters benefited from building inventory.
Research and development expenses for the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2014, were $4,389,000, compared to $3,485,000 for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $904,000. The increase was primarily due to higher expenses to support our new business development opportunities outside of the disk drive industry.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2014, were $6,212,000, compared to $6,216,000 for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $4,000.
During the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2014, we identified approximately 70 positions to be eliminated as part of our continued consolidation effort. This and our site consolidation activities resulted in $650,000 of severance and site consolidation expenses, compared to $332,000 for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2013. The site consolidation expenses were primarily internal labor and contractors related to the consolidation.
Other income (expense), net, for the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2014, included a foreign currency gain of $576,000, compared to a foreign currency gain of $1,980,000 for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2013. These gains were primarily related to U.S. dollar-denominated inter-company liabilities owed to us by our Thai subsidiary.
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended March 30, 2014 vs. Twenty-Six Weeks Ended March 31, 2013
Net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, were $131,011,000, compared to $124,629,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $6,382,000. Suspension assembly sales increased $5,815,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, primarily as a result of a 7% increase in suspension assembly unit shipments due to strong demand in our first quarter of 2014. The increase in shipments was partially offset by a slight decrease in our average selling price compared to the same period of 2013.
Gross profit for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, was $11,393,000, compared to gross profit of $15,398,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $4,005,000. Gross profit as a percent of net sales was 9% and 12% for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, and March 31, 2013, respectively. Although suspension assembly shipments increased slightly, the decline in gross profit was due to higher variable costs due to shipping a higher mix of DSA product and product that uses purchased flexures. Both twenty-six week periods benefited from building inventory.
Research and development expenses for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, were $8,331,000, compared to $6,824,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $1,507,000. The increase was primarily due to higher expenses to support our new business development opportunities outside of the disk drive industry.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, were $12,075,000, compared to $12,382,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $307,000.
During the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, we identified approximately 70 positions to be eliminated as part of our continued consolidation effort. This and our site consolidation activities resulted in $1,242,000 of severance and site consolidation expenses in that period. During the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013, we identified approximately 55 positions to be eliminated as part of our continued focus on overall cost reduction. This and our site consolidation activities resulted in $1,350,000 of severance and site consolidation expenses in that period. The site consolidation expenses were primarily internal labor and contractors related to the consolidation.
The twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, included an asset impairment charge of $4,470,000 on our Eau Claire, Wisconsin assembly building and related assets, as discussed above.
Other income (expense), net, for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, included a foreign currency loss of $2,594,000, compared to a foreign currency gain of $2,118,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013. These gains and losses were primarily related to U.S. dollar-denominated inter-company liabilities owed to us by our Thai subsidiary.
In January 2013, we repurchased $18,682,000 aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 8.50% Convertible Notes by making cash payments totaling $11,583,000, plus accrued and unpaid interest, which payments were funded by the proceeds of the sale of our 10.875% Notes. Applying debt extinguishment accounting, we recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $4,986,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013.
The income tax benefit for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, was $791,000, compared to the income tax provision of $9,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013. For the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, we recognized an $859,000 benefit due to reserves for certain tax refunds that were released due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Although net sales increased in the first half of 2014, and increased slightly in the last quarter of 2013, our net sales have decreased significantly in recent years. We continue to incur net losses which have dampened our ability to generate cash from operations. We currently believe that our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash generated from operations, our credit facility and additional financing, if needed and as available given contractual restrictions, current credit market conditions and our operating performance, will be sufficient to meet our forecasted operating expenses, debt service and capital expenditures through 2014. We currently have outstanding $39,822,000 aggregate principal amount of our 8.50% Convertible Notes which was classified as current in our consolidated balance sheets as of March 30, 2014. Holders of our 8.50% Convertible Notes may require us to purchase all or a portion of their 8.50% Convertible Notes for cash as early as January 15, 2015. We also have outstanding $78,931,000 aggregate principal amount of our 8.50% Secured Notes and $12,200,000 aggregate principal amount of our 10.875% Notes. Our 8.50% Secured Notes and our 10.875% Notes mature on January, 15, 2017.
We may from time to time seek to prepay or retire our outstanding debt through cash purchases in open market or privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. These transactions, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. Our ability to obtain additional financing will depend upon a number of factors, including our future performance and financial results, contractual restrictions and general economic and capital market conditions. We cannot be certain that we will be able to raise additional financing on terms acceptable to us, including covenants that we will be able to comply with in the short term, or at all, if needed. We sold a portion of one of our facilities in the second quarter of 2014 and have a facility in Hutchinson, Minnesota currently offered for sale or lease, which may provide an additional source of cash. If we are unable to obtain new financing, if and when necessary, our future financial results and liquidity could be materially adversely affected.
Our principal sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash flow from operations, our senior secured credit facility, leasing and additional financing capacity, if available given current credit market conditions and our operating performance. Our cash and cash equivalents decreased from $39,403,000 at September 29, 2013, to $39,036,000 at March 30, 2014. Our short-term investments remained at $1,200,000 and are restricted in use. In total, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased by $367,000.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Cash used for operating activities for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, was $188,000, compared to $2,153,000 of cash provided from operating activities for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013. The decrease in operating cash flows was primarily due to a higher net loss partially offset by favorable changes in working capital.
Cash Provided by Investing Activities
For the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, cash provided by investing activities was $1,828,000, compared to $5,730,000 of cash used for investing activities for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013. For the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, the cash provided was primarily due to $6,395,000 of equipment sale/leaseback transactions in the U.S. and Thailand, $4,364,000 in proceeds from the sale of a portion our Eau Claire, Wisconsin building and the release of $1,549,000 of restricted cash that was temporarily held in our senior secured credit facility collections account. Cash provided by these activities was offset by $10,480,000 of capital expenditures primarily for manufacturing equipment for new process technology and capability improvements and product tooling.
Our suspension assembly business is capital intensive. The disk drive industry experiences rapid technology changes that require us to make substantial ongoing capital expenditures in product and process improvements to maintain our competitiveness. Significant industry technology transitions often result in increasing our capital expenditures. The disk drive industry also experiences periods of increased demand and rapid growth followed by periods of oversupply and subsequent contraction, which also results in fluctuations in our capital expenditures. We anticipate capital expenditures will total approximately $20,000,000 in 2014, primarily for product tooling and manufacturing equipment for new process technology and capability improvements, such as DSA suspension assemblies. Financing of these capital expenditures will be principally from operations, our current cash, cash equivalents, our senior secured credit facility, leasing, or additional financing, if available given current credit market conditions and our financial performance.
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Cash used for financing activities for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, was $2,686,000, compared to $10,140,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended March 31, 2013. The cash used for the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014, was primarily due to a $1,980,000 repayment of borrowings from our senior secured credit facility and $732,000 of capital lease payments. The cash used in the twenty-six weeks ended, March 31, 2013, was primarily due to $11,886,000 used for the redemption of all our remaining outstanding 3.25% Notes, and $11,583,000 used for the repurchase of outstanding 8.50% Convertible Notes, offset by $11,590,000 in proceeds from the private placement of our 10.875% Notes and $2,289,000 of net borrowings from our senior secured credit facility.
Short- and Long-Term Debt
Senior Secured Credit Facility - In September 2011, we entered into a revolving credit and security agreement with PNC Bank. The credit agreement provides us with a senior secured credit facility in a principal amount of up to $35,000,000, subject to a borrowing base. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of the personal and real property of Hutchinson Technology Incorporated. The maturity date of the credit facility is October 1, 2014. The credit agreement contains certain financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum EBITDA, and minimum liquidity. We maintain an account at PNC Bank with a minimum balance of $15,000,000, as required under the credit agreement.
Our credit agreement with PNC Bank and the indentures governing the 8.50% Secured Notes and the 10.875% Notes each contain certain covenants that, among other things, limit our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional indebtedness; pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments; enter into agreements that restrict distributions from restricted subsidiaries; sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries; enter into transactions with affiliates; create or incur liens; enter into operating leases; merge, consolidate or sell substantially all of our assets; make capital expenditures; change the nature of our business; and expend the assets or free cash flow of certain subsidiaries. The indentures also limit the amount of our consolidated total assets and free cash flow that can be attributable to subsidiaries that have not guaranteed the 8.50% Secured Notes or, in certain cases, have not pledged their stock to secure the 8.50% Secured Notes.
In January 2013, we entered into a consent and third amendment to our credit agreement with PNC Bank. Under the consent and amendment, PNC Bank consented to our January 2013 debt transactions described below, including the debt private placement and the debt repurchases, and the granting of liens to secure our 10.875% Notes.
In October 2013, we entered into a waiver and fourth amendment to our credit agreement with PNC Bank. The amendment modified the financial covenants, as previously amended, to eliminate the compliance requirement for our fourth quarter ended September 29, 2013, and change the measurement periods and adjust the financial covenants starting with our fiscal first quarter ending December 29, 2013, by excluding from such measurement periods all fiscal quarters ended on or prior to September 29, 2013. With this waiver and amendment in place, we were in compliance with the terms, provisions and financial covenants of credit agreement as of September 29, 2013.
From time to time, we borrow funds under the senior secured credit facility. As of March 30, 2014, we had $2,000,000 outstanding which was repaid early in the following quarter. Our average outstanding balance in the twenty-six weeks ended March 30, 2014 was $2,247,000. Amounts borrowed under the credit facility bear cash interest at a reduced rate equal to, at our election, either (i) PNC Bank’s alternate base rate plus 1.0% per annum, or (ii) LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum if no defaults or events of default exist under the credit agreement. As of March 30, 2014, we were in compliance with the covenants of our credit facility.
If we are unable to generate sufficient operating results in future quarters, we may not be able to comply with financial covenants in the credit agreement in future quarters. If necessary, we intend to negotiate a waiver of any noncompliance or an amendment of the financial covenant specific to the applicable period.
3.25% Notes Redemption - In accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the 3.25% Notes and a notice of redemption thereunder, all $11,885,875 aggregate principal amount of 3.25% Notes were redeemed on or before February 2, 2013, at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but not including, the redemption date. Interest on the 3.25% Notes called for redemption ceased to accrue as of February 2, 2013. Payment of the redemption price was funded by cash on hand. After completion of the redemption, no 3.25% Notes remained outstanding.
2013 Debt Transactions - On January 22, 2013, we sold $12,200,000 aggregate principal amount of 10.875% Notes for a total purchase price of $11,590,000. On the same date, we repurchased $18,682,000 aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 8.50% Convertible Notes by making cash payments totaling $11,583,000, plus accrued and unpaid interest, which payments were funded by the proceeds of the sale of the 10.875% Notes. This refinancing reduced the portion of our outstanding debt subject to a holder-initiated repurchase as early as 2015 from $58,504,000 to $39,822,000.
The 10.875% Notes were issued under an indenture dated as of January 22, 2013, and bear interest at a rate of 10.875% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning July 15, 2013. The 10.875% Notes are secured by liens on all assets securing our senior secured credit facilities (other than capital stock of subsidiaries of our company to the extent that inclusion of such capital stock would require the filing of separate financial statements for such subsidiaries with the SEC, which liens rank junior in priority to the liens securing our senior secured credit facilities and other permitted priority liens and on an equal and ratable basis with the liens securing our 8.50% Secured Notes. The 10.875% Notes are scheduled to mature on January 15, 2017, unless redeemed or repurchased in accordance with their terms. We may redeem all or a portion of the 10.875% Notes at any time by paying 100% of the principal amount redeemed, plus a make-whole premium as of, and accrued and unpaid interest to, the date of redemption.
The indenture governing the 10.875% Notes contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments, enter into agreements that restrict distributions from restricted subsidiaries, sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries, enter into transactions with affiliates, create or incur liens and enter into operating leases. The indenture also limits the amount of our consolidated total assets and free cash flow that can be attributable to subsidiaries that have not guaranteed the 10.875% Notes or, in certain cases, had their stock pledged to secure the 10.875% Notes. The indenture contains customary events of default, the occurrence of which would permit the acceleration of the 10.875% Notes, including failure to pay principal of or interest on the 10.75% Notes, failure to comply with covenants in the indenture or other related documents, default in the payment of principal of, or acceleration of, other material indebtedness for borrowed money of the company, failure of the company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay or discharge material judgments, and bankruptcy of the company or any of its significant subsidiaries.
To accommodate the January 2013 debt transactions described above, on January 22, 2013, we entered into (i) a first supplemental indenture to the indenture dated as of March 30, 2012, which governs the 8.50% Secured Notes, and (ii) a consent and third amendment to our credit agreement.
Capital Leases – As of March 30, 2014, we have remaining capital lease payment obligations of $7,524,000. We expect to enter into more leasing transactions throughout 2014.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2013.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
There have not been any recently adopted accounting standards.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following: demand for and shipments of our products, our market position, program ramps, product mix and adoption, production capabilities and volumes, our operations in Thailand and the United States, capital spending, operating expenses, average selling prices, product costs, operating performance, technology, development, data density trends and storage capacity requirements, customer yields, inventory levels, company-wide financial performance, our business model, cost reductions and economic and market conditions. demand for and shipments of the company’s products, our market position, program ramps, product mix and adoption, pricing, production capabilities and volumes, product costs, our operations in Thailand and the United States, capital spending, operating expenses, and the company’s business model, operating performance and financial results. Words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “approximate,” “plan,” “goal” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Although we believe these statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected by such statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2013. This list of factors is not exhaustive, however, and these or other factors, many of which are outside of our control, could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations. Therefore, you should consider these risk factors with caution and form your own critical and independent conclusions about the likely effect of these risk factors on our future performance. Except as otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement for any reason. You should carefully review the disclosures and the risk factors described in this and other documents we file from time to time with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth herein.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Except as noted in this Item 3, there have been no material changes in our exposure to market risk or to our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2013.
As of March 30, 2014, we had $130,953,000 carrying value of fixed rate debt which had a fair market value of approximately $125,096,000. We used trading activity to determine the fair market value of the 8.50% Convertible Notes and the 8.50% Secured Notes. The 10.875% Notes have not had trading activity, therefore the fair market value estimate for these notes was based on the closing market price of comparable debt as of the end of the fiscal quarter. The fair value of our senior secured credit facility’s carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Our investing activities are guided by an investment policy, which is reviewed at least annually by our board of directors, and whose objectives are preservation and safety of capital, maintenance of necessary liquidity and maximizing of the rate of return within the stated guidelines. Our policy provides guidelines as to the maturity, concentration limits and credit quality of our investments, as well as guidelines for communication, authorized securities and other policies and procedures in connection with our investing activities.
We are exposed to various market risks and potential loss arising from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates in connection with our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities held in investment accounts.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
We have not identified any change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2013.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits:
Unless otherwise indicated, all documents incorporated herein by reference to a document filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act, are located under SEC file number 001-34838.
3.1 | | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of HTI (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 12/29/2002; File No. 0-14709). |
3.2 | | Restated By-Laws of HTI, as amended December 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed 12/18/2013). |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
32 | | Section 1350 Certifications. |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED |
| | | |
| | | |
Date: | May 2, 2014 | By | /s/ Richard J. Penn |
| | | Richard J. Penn |
| | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Date: | May 2, 2014 | By | /s/ David P. Radloff |
| | | David P. Radloff |
| | | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| | | |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. | | Description | | Method of Filing |
3.1 | | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of HTI | | Incorporated by Reference |
3.2 | | Restated By-Laws of HTI, as amended December 16, 2013 | | Incorporated by Reference |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | | Filed Electronically |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. | | Filed Electronically |
32 | | Section 1350 Certifications. | | Filed Electronically |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document | | Filed Electronically |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | | Filed Electronically |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | | Filed Electronically |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | | Filed Electronically |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | | Filed Electronically |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase | | Filed Electronically |