Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART IV
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10K
(Mark One) | ||
ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014 | ||
OR | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 1-3381
The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 23-0962915 (I.R.S. employer identification no.) | |
3111 West Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA (Address of principal executive office) | 19132 (Zip code) |
215-430-9000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
---|---|---|
Common Stock, $1.00 par value | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer ý | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes o No ý
As of the close of business on August 3, 2013 the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $652,232,000.
As of April 5, 2014, there were 53,237,793 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held June 11, 2014 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report.
| | Page | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PART I | ||||||
Item 1. | Business | 1 | ||||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 10 | ||||
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 14 | ||||
Item 2. | Properties | 15 | ||||
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 15 | ||||
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 15 | ||||
PART II | ||||||
Item 5. | Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 16 | ||||
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 18 | ||||
Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 19 | ||||
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 34 | ||||
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 36 | ||||
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 76 | ||||
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 76 | ||||
Item 9B. | Other Information | 79 | ||||
PART III | ||||||
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 79 | ||||
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 79 | ||||
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 79 | ||||
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence | 79 | ||||
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services | 79 | ||||
PART IV | ||||||
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 80 | ||||
Signatures | 83 |
i
GENERAL
The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack and subsidiaries (the "Company") has been the best place to shop and care for your car since it began operations in 1921. Approximately 19,000 associates are focused on delivering the best customer service in the automotive aftermarket to our customers across our nearly 800 locations located throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. Pep Boys satisfies all of a customer's automotive needs through our unique offering of service, tires, parts and accessories.
Our stores are organized into a hub and spoke network consisting of Supercenters and Service & Tire Centers. Supercenters average approximately 20,000 square feet (our new Supercenter format is approximately 14,000 square feet) and combine do-it-for-me service labor, installed merchandise and tire offerings ("DIFM") with do-it-yourself parts and accessories ("DIY"). Most of our Supercenters also have a commercial sales program that delivers parts, tires and equipment to automotive repair shops and dealers. Service & Tire Centers, which average approximately 5,000 square feet, provide DIFM services in neighborhood locations that are conveniently located where our customers live or work. Service & Tire Centers are designed to capture market share and leverage our existing Supercenters and support infrastructure. We also operate a handful of legacy DIY only Pep Express stores.
The following table sets forth the percentage of total revenues from continuing operations contributed by each class of similar products or services for the Company and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere herein:
| Year ended | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||||
Parts and accessories | 59.9 | % | 59.9 | % | 61.0 | % | ||||
Tires | 17.9 | 18.7 | 18.6 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total merchandise sales | 77.8 | 78.6 | 79.6 | |||||||
Service labor | 22.2 | 21.4 | 20.4 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
In fiscal 2013, we opened or acquired 40 new Service & Tire Centers and seven new Supercenters and converted two Supercenters into Service & Tire Centers. We also closed two Service & Tire Centers and four Supercenters. As of February 1, 2014, we operated 568 Supercenters, 225 Service & Tire Centers and six Pep Express stores located in 35 states and Puerto Rico. These locations consist of approximately 12,910,000 gross square feet of retail space, including over 7,500 service bays.
1
The following table indicates, by state, the number of stores the Company had in operation at the end of each of the last four fiscal years, and the number of stores opened and closed by the Company during each of the last three fiscal years:
NUMBER OF STORES AT END OF FISCAL YEARS 2010 THROUGH 2013
State | 2013 Year End | Opened | Closed | 2012 Year End | Opened | Closed | 2011 Year End | Opened | Closed | 2010 Year End | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 39 | 1 | — | 38 | 1 | — | 37 | 36 | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arizona | 20 | — | 2 | 22 | — | — | 22 | — | — | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arkansas | 1 | — | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
California | 149 | 18 | — | 131 | 1 | — | 130 | 4 | 3 | 129 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Colorado | 7 | — | — | 7 | — | — | 7 | — | — | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Connecticut | 7 | — | — | 7 | — | — | 7 | — | — | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Delaware | 9 | — | — | 9 | 1 | — | 8 | 1 | — | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Florida | 98 | 7 | — | 91 | 5 | 4 | 90 | 30 | — | 60 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Georgia | 47 | 1 | 3 | 49 | 3 | 1 | 47 | 22 | — | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Illinois | 38 | 3 | — | 35 | 3 | — | 32 | 3 | — | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indiana | 7 | — | — | 7 | — | — | 7 | — | — | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kentucky | 4 | — | — | 4 | — | — | 4 | — | — | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Louisiana | 8 | — | — | 8 | — | — | 8 | — | — | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Maine | 1 | — | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Maryland | 20 | — | — | 20 | — | — | 20 | 1 | — | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Massachusetts | 7 | — | — | 7 | — | — | 7 | — | — | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Michigan | 5 | — | — | 5 | — | — | 5 | — | — | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Minnesota | 3 | — | — | 3 | — | — | 3 | — | — | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Missouri | 1 | — | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Nevada | 12 | — | — | 12 | — | — | 12 | — | — | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||
New Hampshire | 4 | — | — | 4 | — | — | 4 | — | — | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey | 43 | 4 | 1 | 40 | 4 | — | 36 | 4 | — | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||
New Mexico | 8 | — | — | 8 | — | — | 8 | — | — | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
New York | 39 | 2 | — | 37 | 4 | — | 33 | 2 | — | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
North Carolina | 10 | 2 | — | 8 | — | — | 8 | — | — | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ohio | 12 | — | — | 12 | — | — | 12 | — | — | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Oklahoma | 5 | — | — | 5 | — | — | 5 | — | — | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pennsylvania | 60 | 5 | — | 55 | 2 | — | 53 | 2 | — | 51 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico | 27 | — | — | 27 | — | — | 27 | — | — | 27 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rhode Island | 2 | — | — | 2 | — | — | 2 | — | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
South Carolina | 6 | — | — | 6 | — | — | 6 | — | — | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tennessee | 7 | — | — | 7 | 1 | 1 | 7 | — | — | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Texas | 61 | 4 | — | 57 | 1 | — | 56 | 7 | — | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Utah | 6 | — | — | 6 | — | — | 6 | — | — | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Virginia | 17 | — | — | 17 | — | — | 17 | 1 | — | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Washington | 9 | — | — | 9 | — | — | 9 | 7 | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | 799 | 47 | 6 | 758 | 26 | 6 | 738 | 120 | 3 | 621 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We are targeting a total of 30 new Service & Tire Centers and three new Supercenters in fiscal 2014. We expect to lease new Service & Tire Center and Supercenter locations, as we believe that there are sufficient existing available locations, including build to suit locations, in the marketplace with attractive lease terms to enable our expansion.
2
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
The automotive aftermarket industry is in the mature stage of its life cycle and while the DIY space is dominated by a small number of companies with large market shares, the DIFM or automotive service business is highly fragmented. Over the past decade, consumers have moved away from DIY toward DIFM due to increasing vehicle complexity and electronic content, as well as decreasing availability of diagnostic equipment and know-how. In addition, while this needs-based industry has a dedicated DIY customer base, the number of consumers that would prefer to have a professional fix their vehicle fluctuates with economic cycles. For example, a drop in disposable income during the recession forced some former DIFM consumers to work on their own vehicles, resulting in short-term growth in the DIY market. During this period, weak labor and credit markets depressed new vehicles sales, thereby increasing the average length of vehicle ownership. This increase in the average age of vehicles on the road also aided the short-term growth of the DIY industry as owners of older vehicles were more likely to work on their own vehicles. However, we believe that as the economy continues to gain steam, consumers will become more confident and invest in new vehicles, and once again shift away from DIY toward DIFM and will do so at increasing rates. Consistent with this long-term trend, we have adopted a long-term strategy of growing our automotive service business, while maintaining our DIY customer base by offering the newest and broadest product assortment in the automotive aftermarket.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
All of our efforts are focused on ensuring that Pep Boys is the best place to shop and care for your car. The legacy of our founders—Manny, Moe & Jack—has inspired us since 1921 to deliver passionate customer service. We are people taking care of people ... and their cars. More than just words, we continue to learn more from our growing set of customer data and to advance our customer centered business model. Over the past two years, we have reconstituted our senior executive team to help guide the development of our strategy around our target customer segments and the delivery of world-class customer service. The following strategies have been developed and prioritized to support our vision and, in turn, our ultimate goal as a public company of maximizing shareholder value.
Attract, develop and retain the best people. We need the best people to care for our customers and their cars. This process begins with their recruitment and continues throughout their tenure as Pep Boys associates. We are constantly reviewing and improving our hiring process to include updated core competency and positional profiles and pre-hire assessment screening. Once hired, a Pep Boys associate has the opportunity to participate in a variety of classroom, online skills, and leadership training to develop a career path with us. We also offer performance-based compensation programs designed to reward the delivery of the passionate customer service that is the centerpiece of our vision.
Grow where our target customers live, work and shop. We achieve this through both our physical locations and online presence. We have researched and developed proprietary customer segment targets that we believe allow us to maximize our profitability. Our store growth, and any rationalization of our store base, is designed to optimize the proximity of these locations to our target customers. Similarly, our omni-channel digital strategy, which we call e-SERVE, is developed around making it easier for our target customers to do business with us. pepboys.com (including our mobile device version) allows our customers to learn about the breadth and depth of our service and product offerings, price and schedule service appointments, and purchase products for in store or home delivery.
Deliver customer experiences that are "beyond expectations". We strive to be friendly, do it right, show compassion and keep promises with each and every customer. We have developed a new training program designed to teach our associates how to enhance the customer experience through building relationships with our customers. Before addressing a customer's immediate need, our associates are taught to build rapport with the customer that will not only lead to customer satisfaction with the
3
current transaction, but ultimately to the customer choosing Pep Boys for all of their automotive needs in the future. Information gathered through our rewards program, customer surveys and focus groups helps us to understand the customer experience that our target customer segments expect and the services and products that will best meet their needs and desires.
Provide the best assortment and shopping experience in the automotive aftermarket. We begin by being a full service—tire, maintenance and repair—shop. Our full service capabilities, ASE (Automotive Service Excellence) certified technicians and continuous investment in training and equipment allow customers to rely on us for all of their automotive maintenance and repair needs—from replacing the oil in their engine to replacing the engine itself. By offering a broad assortment of branded and private label products, we enjoy a competitive advantage over many of our DIFM competitors.
The size of our Supercenters allows us to provide the highest level of replacement parts coverage and the broadest range of maintenance, performance and appearance products and accessories in the industry. We are able to leverage our Superhub stores, which have a larger assortment of product than our normal Supercenter, to satisfy customer needs for slow-moving product by delivering this product to requesting Supercenters on demand. We are also expanding our Speed Shops (106 as of the end of fiscal 2013), a store-in-a-store within existing Supercenters that creates a differentiated retail experience for automotive enthusiasts by stocking high-performance and specialty products. We are similarly focused on price optimization and inventory rationalization opportunities.
We are currently testing a new market concept that we call the "Road Ahead," which began in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 with a re-grand opening of our West Hillsboro, Florida location. Due to the success at this store we converted the balance of our Tampa, Florida market to this concept in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The early results have also been encouraging and as a result we will convert an additional 20 Supercenters in three markets to this concept in the first half of fiscal 2014 and have initiated plans for an additional three markets for the back half of fiscal 2014, through the early part of fiscal 2015. Designed around the shopping habits of our target customer segments, this concept enhances the entire store—our people, the product assortment, its exterior and interior look and feel and the marketing programs—to learn how we can be successful in attracting more of these target customers and earn a greater share of their annual spend in the automotive aftermarket. Our Road Ahead strategy also allows us to use our retail business to drive the service business with free professional battery and wiper installations.
Tell our story internally and externally. It is essential to our success that our associates and consumers understand our vision and brand position. As consumers had come to understand the breadth and depth of our offerings and gave us credit for our value proposition, in fiscal 2013 we turned our attention to focusing our message on the customer experience that we believe our target customer segments desire but have been unable to find in the automotive aftermarket. Consistent with our strategy described above, our TRUST THE BOYS TO GET YOU THERE brand positioning shifted from a more promotional message to a more customer service oriented message. This message is conveyed to our associates through corporate communications and leadership training, while tailored marketing plans including TV and radio promotions, digital media, direct marketing, grass-roots and print campaigns deliver the message to our target customer segments.
STORE IMPROVEMENTS
In fiscal 2013, our capital expenditures totaled approximately $65.0 million which included the acquisition of 18 Service and Tire Centers in Southern California. Our fiscal 2013 capital expenditures also included the addition of 29 new locations, the conversion of 11 Supercenters into Superhubs, the addition of 63 Speed Shops within existing Supercenters and required expenditures for existing stores, offices and distribution centers. Our fiscal 2014 capital expenditures are expected to be approximately
4
$80.0 million, which includes the planned addition of 30 Service & Tire Centers, three Supercenters, and the conversion of 41 stores to the new "Road Ahead" format. These expenditures are expected to be funded from cash on hand and net cash generated from operating activities. Additional capacity, if needed, exists under our revolving credit facility.
SERVICES AND PRODUCTS
As of February 1, 2014, we operated a total of 7,520 service bays in 793 of our 799 locations. Each service location performs a full range of automotive maintenance and repair services (except body work) and installs tires, parts and accessories.
Each Pep Boys Supercenter carries a similar product line, with variations based on the number and type of cars in the market where the store is located. A Pep Boys Service & Tire Center carries tires and a limited selection of our products. A full complement of inventory at a typical Supercenter includes an average of approximately 29,000 items, while Service & Tire Centers average approximately 2,000 items. Our product lines include: tires; batteries; new and remanufactured parts for domestic and import vehicles; chemicals and maintenance items; fashion, electronic, and performance accessories; and select non-automotive merchandise that appeals to our target customer segments.
In addition to offering a wide variety of high quality name brand products, we sell an array of high quality products under various private label names. We sell tires under the names DEFINITY, FUTURA® and CORNELL®, and batteries under the name PROSTART®. We also sell wheel covers under the name FUTURA®; air filters, anti-freeze, chemicals, cv axles, hub assemblies, lubricants, oil, oil filters, oil treatments, transmission fluids, custom wheels and wiper blades under the name PROLINE®; alternators, battery booster packs, alkaline type batteries and starters under the name PROSTART®; power steering hoses, chassis parts and power steering pumps under the name PROSTEER®; brakes under the name PROSTOP® and brakes, batteries, starters, ignitions and chassis under the name VALUEGRADE. All products sold by the Company under various private label names were approximately 20% of our merchandise sales in fiscal 2013, 24% in 2012, and 26% in 2011. The year over year decreases are the result of our introduction of additional brand name tires.
Our commercial automotive parts delivery program, branded PEP EXPRESS PARTS®, is designed to increase our market share with the professional installer and to leverage our inventory investment. The program satisfies the commercial customer's automotive inventory needs by taking advantage of the breadth and quality of Pep Boys' parts inventory as well as its experience supplying its own service bays and mechanics. As of February 1, 2014, approximately 79%, or 454, of our 574 Supercenters and Pep Express stores provided commercial parts delivery as compared to approximately 80%, or 458 stores, at the end of fiscal 2012.
We have a point-of-sale system in all of our stores, which gathers sales and inventory data by stock-keeping unit from each store on a daily basis. This information is then used to formulate pricing, inventory, marketing and merchandising strategies. We have an electronic parts catalog that allows our associates to efficiently look up the parts that our customers need and to provide complete job solutions, advice and information for customers' vehicles. We have an electronic work order system in all service centers. This system creates a service history for each vehicle, provides customers with a comprehensive sales document and enables us to maintain a service customer database.
We use a competitive pricing strategy, setting prices based on market forces and then complementing them with promotions. We believe that targeted advertising and promotions play important roles in succeeding in today's environment. We are constantly working to understand our target customer segments' needs and desires so that we can deliver outstanding customer service and build long-lasting, loyal relationships with them. We utilize advertising, promotions and a loyalty card program (Rewards) to convey our commitment to customer service and to promote our service and repair capabilities and product offerings. We are committed to an effective multi-media promotional
5
schedule supplemented by extensive direct marketing, grass-roots campaigns and occasional print campaigns. Finally, we utilize in-store signage and creative product placement to help educate customers about services and products that fit their needs.
Through our desktop and mobile website at www.pepboys.com, we strive to empower customers to make informed product and service purchase decisions for their automotive projects and vehicle maintenance needs. We focus on providing dependable product and service information, online buying guides and how-to advice, customer product ratings and reviews, product videos and clear repair service details in a convenient 24/7 online experience. Through our website, customers can learn more about the Pep Boys brand and our products and services, purchase and schedule installation of tires with our TreadSmart application, schedule automotive maintenance and repair services with our eServe application, keep track of maintenance and service records through our online Glovebox application, and purchase automotive parts and accessories through several delivery methods, including buying online and shipping to home or picking up in store, as well as the convenience to reserve items online and pay in store.
This year we have continued to improve the stability of our online infrastructure through a platform migration upgrade and continued vigilance of Payment Card Industry (PCI) standards and compliance to ensure our overall security and customer privacy. We maintain a dedicated online customer service team who provides direct support, including answering any order, product or service questions, assistance in ordering and basic technical support to customers who contact them via phone, live chat, email or webform. We are committed to the continued improvement of our online presence with a focus on providing a seamless omni-channel customer experience that builds trust and enriches the personal connection between our customers and our brand.
STORE OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT
Most Pep Boys stores are open seven days a week. Most Supercenters have a Retail Manager and Service Manager (Service & Tire Centers only have a Service Manager) who report to geographic-specific Area Directors and Divisional or Assistant Divisional Vice Presidents. The Divisional or Assistant Divisional Vice Presidents report to one of the Vice President—Supercenters, East US, the Vice President—Supercenters, West US or the Vice President—Service & Tire Centers who, in turn, report to the Senior Vice President—Store Operations, who, in turn, reports to the President & Chief Executive Officer. As of February 1, 2014, the average length of service with Pep Boys for a Retail Manager and a Service Manager is approximately 11.0 and 7.5 years, respectively.
Supervision and control over individual stores is facilitated by Area Directors and Divisional or Assistant Divisional Vice Presidents who make regular visits to stores and utilize the Company's computer system and operational handbooks. All of our advertising, accounting, purchasing, information technology and most administrative functions are conducted at our corporate headquarters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Certain administrative functions for our regional operations are performed at various regional offices. See "Item 2 Properties."
INVENTORY CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTION
Most of our merchandise is distributed to our stores from our warehouses by dedicated and contract carriers. Target levels of inventory for products are established for each warehouse and store based upon prior shipment history, sales trends and seasonal demand. Inventory on hand is compared to target levels on a weekly basis at each warehouse, potentially triggering re-ordering of merchandise from suppliers. In addition, each Pep Boys store has an automated inventory replenishment system that orders additional inventory, generally from a warehouse, when a store's inventory on-hand falls below the target level. We also consolidate certain slow-moving hard parts inventory into our centrally-located
6
Indianapolis warehouse that can service each of our stores with overnight delivery of these parts when necessary.
Implementation of the Superhub concept enables local expansion of our auto parts product assortment in a cost effective manner. We are now able to satisfy customer needs for slow-moving auto parts by carrying limited amounts of this product at Superhub locations. These Superhubs then deliver this product to requesting Supercenters to fulfill customer demand. Superhubs are generally replenished from distribution centers multiple times per week. As of February 1, 2014, we operated 53 Superhubs within existing Supercenters, with plans to convert an additional 10 Superhubs in fiscal 2014. These Superhubs, including our additional conversions in 2014, will provide approximately 550 of our stores with an expanded auto parts assortment. We also maintain one free standing tire hub warehouse in the Philadelphia market that offers an expanded assortment of tires and batteries for same day delivery to our stores in order to satisfy customer demand directly rather than from tire distributors. In fiscal 2014, we have plans to test three additional tire hubs within existing Supercenters.
SUPPLIERS
During fiscal 2013, our ten largest suppliers accounted for approximately 45% of the merchandise purchased. Only one of our suppliers accounted for more than 10% of our purchases. We have one long-term contract under which we are required to purchase merchandise. We believe that the relationships that we have established with our suppliers are generally good.
In the past, we have not experienced difficulty in obtaining satisfactory sources of supply and we believe that adequate alternative sources of supply exist, at similar cost, for the types of merchandise sold in our stores.
COMPETITION
We operate in a highly competitive environment. We encounter competition from national and regional chains, automotive dealerships and from local independent service providers and merchants. Our competitors include general, full range and discount department stores and online retailers which carry automotive parts and accessories and/or have automotive service centers, as well as specialized automotive retailers. Generally, the specialized automotive retailers focus on either DIFM or DIY. We believe that our operation in both DIFM and DIY differentiates us from most of our competitors. However, certain competitors are larger in terms of sales volume and/or number of stores. Therefore, these competitors have access to greater capital and management resources and have either been operating longer or have more stores in particular geographic areas. The principal methods of competition in our industry include store location, customer service, product offerings, quality and price.
REGULATION
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and governmental regulations relating to the operation of our business, including those governing the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous substances contained in the products that we sell and use in our service bays, the recycling of batteries, tires and used lubricants, the sale of small engine merchandise and the ownership and operation of real property.
7
EMPLOYEES
At February 1, 2014, the Company employed 18,914 persons as follows:
Description | Full-time | % | Part-time | % | Total | % | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retail | 4,045 | 29.1 | 3,108 | 61.6 | 7,153 | 37.8 | |||||||||||||
Service center | 8,404 | 60.6 | 1,863 | 37.0 | 10,267 | 54.3 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Store total | 12,449 | 89.7 | 4,971 | 98.6 | 17,420 | 92.1 | |||||||||||||
Warehouses | 584 | 4.2 | 63 | 1.3 | 647 | 3.4 | |||||||||||||
Offices | 841 | 6.1 | 6 | 0.1 | 847 | 4.5 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total employees | 13,874 | 100.0 | 5,040 | 100.0 | 18,914 | 100.0 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We had no union employees as of February 1, 2014. At February 2, 2013, we employed 13,886 full-time and 5,555 part-time employees.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained herein, including in "Item 1 Business" and "Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations", constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "guidance", "expect", "anticipate", "estimates", "targets", "forecasts" and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include management's expectations regarding implementation of its long-term strategic plan, future financial performance, automotive aftermarket trends, levels of competition, business development activities, future capital expenditures, financing sources and availability and the effects of regulation and litigation. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be achieved. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements due to factors beyond our control, including the strength of the national and regional economies, retail and commercial consumers' ability to spend, the health of the various sectors of the automotive aftermarket, the weather in geographical regions with a high concentration of our stores, competitive pricing, the location and number of competitors' stores, product and labor costs and the additional factors described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). See "Item 1A Risk Factors." Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events.
SEC REPORTING
We electronically file certain documents with, or furnish such documents to, the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, along with any related amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. From time-to-time, we may also file registration and related statements pertaining to equity or debt offerings. The SEC maintains an Internet website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file or furnish documents electronically with the SEC. All our filings can be accessed through the Securities and Exchange Commission website at www.sec.gov and searching with our ticker symbol "PBY".
We provide free electronic access to our annual, quarterly and current reports (and all amendments to these reports) on our Internet website, www.pepboys.com, under the Investor Relations/Financial Information/SEC Filings link. These reports are available on our website as soon as
8
reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials with or to the SEC. Information on our website does not constitute part of this Annual Report, and any references to our website herein are intended as inactive textual references only.
Copies of our SEC reports are also available free of charge. Please call our investor relations department at 215-430-9105 or write Pep Boys, Investor Relations, 3111 West Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19132 to request copies.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following table indicates the name, age, tenure with the Company and position (together with the year of election to such position) of the executive officers of the Company:
Name | Age | Tenure with Company as of April 2014 | Position with the Company and Date of Election to Position | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michael R. Odell | 50 | 7 years | President & Chief Executive Officer since June 2010 | ||||
David R. Stern | 47 | 2 years | Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer since September 2012 | ||||
Christopher J. Adams | 46 | 1 year | Senior Vice President—Store Operations since March 2013 | ||||
Thomas J. Carey | 56 | 2 years | Senior Vice President—Chief Customer Officer since August 2012 | ||||
Joseph A. Cirelli | 55 | 37 years | Senior Vice President—Business Development since November 2007 | ||||
James F. Flanagan | 53 | 7 months | Senior Vice President—Chief Human Resources Officer since August 2013 | ||||
John J. Kelly | 56 | 1 month | Senior Vice President—Merchandising since March 2014 | ||||
Brian D. Zuckerman | 44 | 15 years | Senior Vice President—General Counsel & Secretary since March 2009 |
Michael R. Odell was named Chief Executive Officer on September 22, 2008, after serving as Interim Chief Executive Officer since April 23, 2008. Mr. Odell received the additional title of President on June 17, 2010. Mr. Odell joined Pep Boys in September 2007 as Executive Vice President—Chief Operating Officer, after having most recently served as the Executive Vice President and General Manager of Sears Retail & Specialty Stores. Mr. Odell joined Sears in its finance department in 1994 where he served until he joined Sears operations team in 1998. There he served in various executive operations positions of increasing seniority, including as Vice President, Stores—Sears Automotive Group.
David R. Stern joined Pep Boys in September 2012 after having most recently served as Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer of A.C. Moore Arts and Crafts. From 2007 until 2009, Mr. Stern held roles at Coldwater Creek, including Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis and Corporate Controller. From 2000 to 2007, Mr. Stern was the Chief Financial Officer of Petro Services. Mr. Stern began his career as an internal auditor and gained experience as a financial analyst, accounting manager and corporate controller at several companies, including Delhaize America, before joining Petro Services.
Christopher J. Adams joined Pep Boys in March 2013 after having most recently served as Chief Operating Officer of CarGroup Holdings LLC d/b/a webuyanycar.com since November 2010. From July 2008 to September 2010, Mr. Adams served as Chief Operating Officer of The BabyPlus Company, a manufacturer and distributor of a prenatal education system. From November 2006 to July 2008, Mr. Adams served as Chief Operating Officer of Holland Partners, a developer and manager of
9
multifamily communities. Mr. Adams began his career at Enterprise Rent-A-Car in September 1989 where through July 2006 he progressed from a management trainee to become one of the executives selected to open up and lead Enterprise's U.K. operations.
Thomas J. Carey joined Pep Boys in August 2012 after having most recently served as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer for Orchard Supply Hardware Stores. From March 2003 to June 2007, Mr. Carey served as Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer, of West Marine, Inc. Prior to joining West Marine, Mr. Carey served in various marketing leadership positions of increasing seniority with several national retailers, including Sunglass Hut, Bloomingdale's and Builders Square. Mr. Carey also has agency experience with, among others, Ogilvy & Mather and Young & Rubicam.
Joseph A. Cirelli was named Senior Vice President—Corporate Development in November 2007. Since March 1977, Mr. Cirelli has served the Company in positions of increasing seniority, including Senior Vice President—Service, Vice President—Real Estate and Development, Vice President—Operations Administration, and Vice President—Customer Satisfaction.
James F. Flanagan joined Pep Boys in August 2013 after having most recently served as the Senior Vice President of Human Resources for Procurian, a comprehensive procurement solution company. From 2004 to 2012, Mr. Flanagan served as Executive President, Human Resources of GSI Commerce. Mr. Flanagan's 20+ years of human resources leadership experience also included positions at Starbucks, Starwood Hotels, Sheraton Hotels, Bank of America and homegrocer.com. Mr. Flanagan began his career as a labor and employment attorney.
John J. Kelly joined Pep Boys in March 2014 after having most recently served as President of Decible, a start-up electronics joint-venture, since June 2013. From April 2009 to May 2013, Mr. Kelly served as Vice President of Home Merchandising of QVC. Prior to joining QVC, Mr. Kelly served as Chief Merchandising Officer of Circuit City Stores. Mr. Kelly's 30+ years of merchandising leadership experience also included positions at Sharp Electronics and Macy's.
Brian D. Zuckerman was named Senior Vice President—General Counsel & Secretary on March 1, 2009 after having most recently served as Vice President—General Counsel & Secretary since 2003. Mr. Zuckerman joined the Company as a staff attorney in 1999. Prior to joining Pep Boys, Mr. Zuckerman practiced corporate and securities law with two firms in Philadelphia.
Each of the executive officers serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors of the Company.
The following section discloses all known material risks that we face. However, it does not include risks that may arise in the future that are yet unknown nor existing risks that we do not judge material to the presentation of our financial statements. If any of the events or circumstances described as risk below actually occurs, our business, results of operations and/or financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related to Pep Boys
We may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our long-term strategic plan, which we update annually, includes numerous initiatives including our "Road Ahead" remodels and store growth programs to increase sales, enhance our margins and increase our return on invested capital in order to increase our earnings and cash flow. If these initiatives are unsuccessful, or if we are unable to implement the initiatives efficiently and effectively, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
10
Successful implementation of our business strategy also depends on factors specific to the automotive aftermarket industry, many of which may be beyond our control (see "Risks Related to Our Industry").
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from our operations, our liquidity will suffer and we may be unable to satisfy our obligations.
We require significant capital to fund our business. While we believe we have the ability to sufficiently fund our planned operations and capital expenditures for the next fiscal year, circumstances could arise that would materially affect our liquidity. For example, cash flows from our operations could be affected by changes in consumer spending habits or the failure to maintain favorable supplier payment terms or our inability to successfully implement sales growth initiatives. We may be unsuccessful in securing alternative financing when needed, on terms that we consider acceptable, or at all.
The degree to which we are leveraged could have important consequences on investments in our securities, including the following risks:
- •
- our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or general corporate purposes may be impaired in the future;
- •
- a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations must be dedicated to the payment of rent and the principal and interest on our debt, thereby reducing the funds available for other purposes;
- •
- our failure to comply with financial and operating restrictions placed on us and our subsidiaries by our credit facilities could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on our business or our prospects; and
- •
- if we are substantially more leveraged than some of our competitors, we might be at a competitive disadvantage to those competitors that have lower debt service obligations and significantly greater operating and financial flexibility than we do.
We depend on our relationships with our suppliers and a disruption of these relationships or of our suppliers' operations could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our business depends on developing and maintaining productive relationships with our suppliers. Many factors outside our control may harm these relationships. For example, financial difficulties that some of our suppliers may face could increase the cost of the products we purchase from them or might interrupt our source of supply. In addition, our failure to promptly pay or order sufficient quantities of inventory from our suppliers may increase the cost of products we purchase or could lead to suppliers refusing to sell products to us at all.
A disruption of our supplier relationships or a disruption in our suppliers' operations could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We depend on our senior management team and our other personnel, and we face substantial competition for qualified personnel.
Our success depends in part on the efforts of our senior management team. Our continued success will also depend on our ability to retain existing, and attract additional, qualified field personnel to meet our needs. We face substantial competition, both from within and outside of the automotive aftermarket, to retain and attract qualified personnel. In addition, we believe that the number of qualified automotive service technicians in the industry is generally insufficient to meet demand.
11
We are subject to environmental laws and may be subject to environmental liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on us in the future.
We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and governmental regulations relating to the operation of our business, including those governing the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous substances contained in the products we sell and use in our service bays, the recycling of batteries, tires and used lubricants, the ownership and operation of real property and the sale of small engine merchandise. When we acquire or dispose of real property or enter into financings secured by real property, we undertake investigations that may reveal soil and/or groundwater contamination at the subject real property. All such known contamination has either been remediated, or is in the process of being remediated. Any costs expected to be incurred related to such contamination are either covered by insurance or financial reserves provided for in the consolidated financial statements. However, there exists the possibility of additional soil and/or groundwater contamination on our real property where we have not undertaken an investigation. A failure by us to comply with environmental laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on us.
A breach of our security could compromise customer, employee or Company information and could harm our reputation, lead to substantial additional costs, or possible litigation.
In the course of business, personal information about our customers and employees is stored both electronically and physically. We have taken reasonable and appropriate steps to safeguard this information. If this information is compromised, however, our reputation could be damaged resulting in lost business, we could incur additional costs in remediating the issue, or we could face possible regulatory action. The regulatory environment related to information security and privacy is constantly evolving, and compliance with those requirements could result in additional costs. There is no guarantee that the procedures we have implemented are adequate to safeguard all confidential information, and a breach of this information could potentially have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Business interruptions may negatively impact our store hours, operability of our computer systems and the availability and cost of merchandise which may adversely impact our sales and profitability.
War or acts of terrorism, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes or other natural disasters, or the threat of any of these calamities or others, may have a negative impact on our ability to obtain merchandise to sell in our stores, result in certain of our stores being closed for an extended period of time, negatively affect the lives of our customers or associates, or otherwise negatively impact our operations. Some of our merchandise is imported from other countries. If imported goods become difficult or impossible to import into the United States, and if we cannot obtain such merchandise from other sources at similar costs, our sales and profit margins may be negatively affected.
In the event that commercial transportation is curtailed or substantially delayed, our business may be adversely impacted, as we may have difficulty receiving merchandise from our suppliers and shipping it to our stores.
Terrorist attacks, war in the Middle East, or insurrection involving any oil producing country would likely result in an abrupt increase in the price of crude oil, gasoline, diesel fuel and other types of energy. Such price increases would increase the cost of doing business for us and our suppliers, and also would negatively impact our customers' disposable income and have an adverse impact on our business, sales, profit margins and results of operations.
We rely extensively on our computer systems and the systems of our business partners to manage inventory, process transactions and report results. Any such systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, telecommunication failures, computer viruses, security breaches and catastrophic events. If our computer systems or those of our business partners fail we may experience
12
loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in our ability to process transactions and manage inventory. Any such loss, if widespread or extended, could adversely affect the operation of our business and our results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Industry
Our industry is highly competitive, and price competition in some segments of the automotive aftermarket, or a loss of trust in our participation in the "do-it-for-me" market, could cause a material decline in our revenues and earnings.
The automotive aftermarket retail and service industry is highly competitive and subjects us to a wide variety of competitors. We compete primarily with the following types of businesses in each segment of the automotive aftermarket:
Retail
- •
- automotive parts and accessories stores;
- •
- automobile dealers that supply manufacturer replacement parts and accessories;
- •
- mass merchandisers and wholesale clubs that sell automotive products and select non-automotive merchandise that appeals to automotive "Do-It-Yourself" customers, such as generators, power tools and canopies; and
- •
- online retailers
- •
- mass merchandisers, wholesalers and jobbers (some of which are associated with national parts distributors or associations).
Do-It-Yourself
Commercial
Service
- •
- regional and local full service automotive repair shops;
- •
- automobile dealers that provide repair and maintenance services;
- •
- national and regional (including franchised) tire retailers that provide additional automotive repair and maintenance services; and
- •
- national and regional (including franchised) specialized automotive (such as oil change, brake and transmission) repair facilities that provide additional automotive repair and maintenance services.
Do-It-For-Me
- •
- national and regional (including franchised) tire retailers; and
- •
- mass merchandisers and wholesale clubs that sell tires.
Tires
A number of our competitors have more financial resources, are more geographically diverse, have a higher geographic market concentration or have better name recognition than we do, which might place us at a competitive disadvantage to those competitors. Because we seek to offer competitive prices, if our competitors reduce their prices we may also be forced to reduce our prices, which could cause a material decline in our revenues and earnings.
13
With respect to the service labor category, the majority of consumers are unfamiliar with their vehicle's mechanical operation and, as a result, often select a service provider based on trust. Potential occurrences of negative publicity associated with the Pep Boys brand, the products we sell or installation or repairs performed in our service bays, whether or not factually accurate, could cause consumers to lose confidence in our products and services in the short or long term, and cause them to choose our competitors for their automotive service needs.
Vehicle miles driven may decrease, resulting in a decline of our revenues and negatively affect our results of operations.
Our industry is significantly influenced by the number of vehicle miles driven. Factors that may cause the number of vehicle miles and our revenues and our results of operations to decrease include:
- •
- the weather—as vehicle maintenance may be deferred during periods of inclement weather;
- •
- the economy—as during periods of poor economic conditions, customers may defer vehicle maintenance or repair and drive less due to unemployment, and during periods of good economic conditions, consumers may opt to purchase new vehicles rather than service the vehicles they currently own and replace worn or damaged parts;
- •
- gas prices—as increases in gas prices may deter consumers from using their vehicles; and
- •
- travel patterns—as changes in travel patterns may cause consumers to rely more heavily on mass transportation.
Economic factors affecting consumer spending habits may continue, resulting in a decline in revenues and could negatively impact our business.
Many economic and other factors outside our control, including consumer confidence, consumer spending levels, employment levels, consumer debt levels and inflation, as well as the availability of consumer credit, affect consumer spending habits. A significant deterioration in the global financial markets and economic environment, recessions or an uncertain economic outlook could adversely affect consumer spending habits and result in lower levels of economic activity. The domestic and international political situation also affects consumer confidence. Any of these events and factors could cause consumers to curtail spending, especially with respect to our more discretionary merchandise offerings, such as automotive accessories, tools and personal transportation products.
During fiscal 2009, there was significant deterioration in the global financial markets and economic environment, which negatively impacted consumer spending and our revenues. While the economic climate improved somewhat in fiscal 2012, consumer spending has not returned to pre-recession levels. If the economy does not continue to strengthen, or if our efforts to counteract the impacts of these trends are not sufficiently effective, our revenues could decline, negatively affecting our results of operations.
Consolidation among our competitors may negatively impact our business.
Our industry has experienced consolidation over time. If this trend continues or if our competitors are able to achieve efficiencies in their mergers, the Company may face greater competitive pressures in the markets in which we operate.
ITEM 1B UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
14
The Company owns its five-story, approximately 300,000 square foot corporate headquarters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Company also owns the following administrative regional offices—approximately 4,000 square feet of space in each of Melrose Park, Illinois and Bayamon, Puerto Rico. The Company leases an administrative regional office of approximately 3,500 square feet in Los Angeles, California.
Of the 799 store locations operated by the Company at February 1, 2014, 228 are owned and 571 are leased. As of February 1, 2014, 142 of the 228 stores owned by the Company are currently used as collateral under our Senior Secured Term Loan, due October 2018.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the owned and leased warehouse space utilized by the Company to replenish its store locations at February 1, 2014:
Warehouse Locations | Products Warehoused | Approximate Square Footage | Owned or Leased | Stores Serviced | States Serviced | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
San Bernardino, CA | All | 600,000 | Leased | 196 | AZ, CA, NV, UT, WA | |||||||
McDonough, GA | All | 392,000 | Owned | 244 | AL, FL, GA, LA, NC, PR, SC, TN | |||||||
Mesquite, TX | All | 244,000 | Owned | 82 | AR, CO, LA, MO, NM, OK, TX | |||||||
Plainfield, IN | All | 403,000 | Owned | 80 | IL, IN, KY, MI, MN, OH, PA | |||||||
Chester, NY | All | 402,000 | Owned | 197 | CT, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA | |||||||
Philadelphia, PA | Tires & Batteries | 74,000 | Leased | 70 | DE, NJ, PA, VA, MD | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | 2,115,000 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company anticipates that its existing and future warehouse space and its access to outside storage will accommodate inventory necessary to support future store expansion and any increase in SKUs through the end of fiscal 2014.
The Company is party to a consent decree, effective July 15, 2010, with the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") that, among other things, required the Company to implement a formal compliance program with respect to certain small gasoline engine merchandise sold by the Company. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the EPA alleged, in writing, that the Company had violated certain inspection, testing and reporting requirements of the Consent Decree and made an aggregated stipulated penalty demand of $2.3 million as a result thereof. The Company is currently engaged in settlement negotiations with the EPA with respect thereto. The Company has accrued an amount that it believes is sufficient to resolve those violations for which it believes it is liable. If the Company is unable to resolve all of the violations with the EPA through its settlement negotiations, the Company intends to invoke formal dispute resolution procedures with the EPA under the terms of the Consent Decree.
The Company is also party to various actions and claims arising in the normal course of business. The Company believes that amounts accrued for awards or assessments in connection with all such matters are adequate and that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position. However, there exists a possibility of loss in excess of the amounts accrued, the amount of which cannot currently be estimated. While the Company does not believe that the amount of such excess loss will be material to the Company's financial position, any such loss could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations in the period(s) during which the underlying matters are resolved.
ITEM 4 MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
15
ITEM 5 MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The common stock of The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "PBY." There were 3,935 registered shareholders as of April 5, 2014. Since January 29, 2012 we have not paid a dividend on our common stock. The following table sets forth for the periods listed, the high and low sale prices of the Company's common stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange:
| Market Price Per Share | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Low | |||||
Fiscal 2013 | |||||||
Fourth quarter | $ | 13.86 | $ | 11.36 | |||
Third quarter | 13.05 | 11.01 | |||||
Second quarter | 12.94 | 11.14 | |||||
First quarter | 12.14 | 10.29 | |||||
Fiscal 2012 | |||||||
Fourth quarter | $ | 11.16 | $ | 9.48 | |||
Third quarter | 10.57 | 8.76 | |||||
Second quarter | 14.93 | 8.67 | |||||
First quarter | 15.46 | 14.90 |
On December 12, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $50.0 million of the Company's common stock to be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, with no expiration date.
The Company repurchased 238,000 shares of common stock for $2.8 million in Fiscal 2013. There were no shares repurchased in the fourth quarter of 2013. The Company repurchased 35,000 shares of common stock for $0.3 million in Fiscal 2012 and no shares were repurchased in Fiscal 2011. The repurchased shares are included in the Company's treasury stock.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table sets forth the Company's shares authorized for issuance under its equity compensation plans at February 1, 2014:
| Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column (a)) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 2,738,100 | $ | 5.26 | 2,831,084 |
The Company maintains an Employee Stock Purchase Plan with an authorized aggregate share limit of 2,000,000 shares of Pep Boys' Common Stock. Eligible employees can elect to have up to 10 percent of compensation deducted for purchase of Company stock at a discount under the Plan. For fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively, the total number of shares sold to employees was 62,547; 39,552; and 20,963. As of February 1, 2014, the total remaining for purchase was 1,875,753 shares.
16
STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE
The following graph compares the cumulative total return on shares of Pep Boys stock over the past five years with the cumulative total return on shares of companies in (1) the Standard & Poor's SmallCap 600 Index, (2) the S&P 600 Automotive Retail Index and (3) an index of peer and comparable companies as determined by the Company. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested in January 2009 in Pep Boys Stock and in each of the indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends. The S&P 600 Automotive Retail Index consists of companies in the S&P SmallCap 600 index that meet the definition of the automotive retail classification, and is currently comprised of: Group 1 Automotive, Inc.; Lithia Motors, Inc.; Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.; Sonic Automotive, Inc.; and The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack. The companies currently comprising the Peer Group are: Aaron's, Inc.; Advance Auto Parts, Inc.; AutoZone, Inc.; Big 5 Sporting Goods Corp.; Cabelas, Inc.; Conn's, Inc.; Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.; HHGregg, Inc.; Midas, Inc. (included through FYE 2012); Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.; O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.; PetSmart, Inc.; RadioShack Corp.; Rent-A-Center, Inc.; Tractor Supply Co.; West Marine, Inc.
Company/Index | Jan. 2009 | Jan. 2010 | Jan. 2011 | Jan. 2012 | Jan. 2013 | Jan. 2014 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pep Boys | $ | 100.00 | $ | 293.18 | $ | 496.44 | $ | 433.48 | $ | 395.08 | $ | 428.45 | |||||||
S&P SmallCap 600 Index | 100.00 | 138.97 | 180.75 | 196.79 | 228.32 | 290.04 | |||||||||||||
Peer Group | 100.00 | 135.79 | 203.21 | 267.11 | 305.86 | 388.99 | |||||||||||||
S&P 600 Automotive Retail Index | 100.00 | 277.11 | 396.02 | 506.34 | 612.87 | 698.89 |
17
ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth the selected financial data for the Company and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere herein.
Fiscal Year Ended | Feb. 1, 2014 (52 weeks) | Feb. 2, 2013 (53 weeks) | Jan. 28, 2012 (52 weeks) | Jan. 29, 2011 (52 weeks) | Jan. 30, 2010 (52 weeks) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollar amounts are in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA | ||||||||||||||||
Merchandise sales | $ | 1,608,697 | $ | 1,643,948 | $ | 1,642,757 | $ | 1,598,168 | $ | 1,533,619 | ||||||
Service revenue | 457,871 | 446,782 | 420,870 | 390,473 | 377,319 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | 2,066,568 | 2,090,730 | 2,063,627 | 1,988,641 | 1,910,938 | |||||||||||
Costs of merchandise sales | 1,108,359 | 1,159,994 | 1,154,322 | 1,110,380 | 1,084,804 | |||||||||||
Cost of service revenue | 470,832 | 439,236 | 399,776 | 355,909 | 340,027 | |||||||||||
Gross profit from merchandise sales(10) | 500,338 | (1) | 483,954 | (3) | 488,435 | (5) | 487,788 | (7) | 448,815 | (8) | ||||||
Gross (loss) profit from service revenue(10) | (12,961 | )(1) | 7,546 | (3) | 21,094 | (5) | 34,564 | (7) | 37,292 | (8) | ||||||
Total gross profit | 487,377 | (1) | 491,500 | (3) | 509,529 | (5) | 522,352 | (7) | 486,107 | (8) | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 464,852 | 463,416 | 443,986 | 442,239 | 430,261 | |||||||||||
Pension settlement expense | — | 17,753 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Net (loss) gain from disposition of assets | (227 | ) | 1,323 | 27 | 2,467 | 1,213 | ||||||||||
Operating profit | 22,298 | 11,654 | 65,570 | 82,580 | 57,059 | |||||||||||
Merger termination fees, net | — | 42,816 | (2) | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Non-operating income | 1,789 | 2,012 | 2,324 | 2,609 | 2,261 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | 14,797 | 33,982 | (4) | 26,306 | 26,745 | 21,704 | (9) | |||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and discontinued operations | 9,290 | 22,500 | 41,588 | 58,444 | 37,616 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 2,237 | 9,345 | 12,460 | (6) | 21,273 | (6) | 13,503 | |||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before discontinued operations | 7,053 | 13,155 | 29,128 | 37,171 | 24,113 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax | (188 | ) | (345 | ) | (225 | ) | (540 | ) | (1,077 | )(8) | ||||||
Net earnings | 6,865 | 12,810 | 28,903 | 36,631 | 23,036 | |||||||||||
BALANCE SHEET DATA | ||||||||||||||||
Working capital | $ | 131,029 | $ | 126,505 | $ | 166,627 | $ | 203,367 | $ | 205,525 | ||||||
Current ratio | 1.19 to 1 | 1.18 to 1 | 1.27 to 1 | 1.36 to 1 | 1.40 to 1 | |||||||||||
Merchandise inventories | $ | 672,354 | $ | 641,208 | $ | 614,136 | $ | 564,402 | $ | 559,118 | ||||||
Property and equipment-net | $ | 625,525 | $ | 657,270 | $ | 696,339 | $ | 700,981 | $ | 706,450 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,605,481 | $ | 1,603,949 | $ | 1,633,779 | $ | 1,556,672 | $ | 1,499,086 | ||||||
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | $ | 199,500 | $ | 198,000 | $ | 294,043 | $ | 295,122 | $ | 306,201 | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity | $ | 548,065 | $ | 537,572 | $ | 504,329 | $ | 478,460 | $ | 443,295 | ||||||
DATA PER COMMON SHARE | ||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings from continuing operations before discontinued operations | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.46 | ||||||
Basic earnings | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.44 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings from continuing operations before discontinued operations | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.46 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.54 | 0.69 | 0.44 | |||||||||||
Cash dividends declared | — | — | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | |||||||||||
Book value | 10.30 | 10.12 | 9.56 | 9.10 | 8.46 | |||||||||||
Common share price range: | ||||||||||||||||
High | 13.86 | 15.46 | 14.70 | 15.96 | 10.83 | |||||||||||
Low | 10.29 | 8.67 | 8.18 | 7.86 | 2.76 | |||||||||||
OTHER STATISTICS | ||||||||||||||||
Return on average stockholders' equity(11) | 1.3 | % | 2.4 | % | 5.8 | % | 7.9 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||||
Common shares issued and outstanding | 53,198,169 | 53,125,743 | 52,753,719 | 52,585,131 | 52,392,967 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 53,982 | $ | 54,696 | $ | 74,746 | $ | 70,252 | $ | 43,214 | ||||||
Number of stores | 799 | 758 | 738 | 621 | 587 | |||||||||||
Number of service bays | 7,520 | 7,303 | 7,182 | 6,259 | 6,027 |
- (1)
- Includes an aggregate pretax charge of $7.7 million for asset impairment, of which $2.4 million was charged to merchandise cost of sales, $5.3 million was charged to service cost of sales.
- (2)
- In fiscal 2012, we recorded settlement proceeds, net of merger related costs of $42.8 million, resulting from the termination of the "go private" transaction.
18
- (3)
- Includes an aggregate pretax charge of $10.6 million for asset impairment, of which $5.1 million was charged to merchandise cost of sales, $5.5 million was charged to service cost of sales.
- (4)
- Includes $11.2 million of fees associated with debt refinancing.
- (5)
- Includes an aggregate pretax charge of $1.6 million for asset impairment, of which $0.6 million was charged to merchandise cost of sales, $1.0 million was charged to service cost of sales.
- (6)
- Includes a tax benefit of $3.6 million and $2.2 million in Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively, due to the release of valuation allowances on state net operating loss carryforwards and credits.
- (7)
- Includes a pretax benefit of $5.9 million due to the reduction in reserve for excess inventory which reduced merchandise cost of sales and an aggregate pretax charge of $1.0 million for asset impairment, of which $0.8 million was charged to merchandise cost of sales and $0.2 million was charged to service cost of sales.
- (8)
- Includes an aggregate pretax charge of $3.1 million for asset impairment, of which $2.2 million was charged to merchandise cost of sales, $0.7 million was charged to service cost of sales and $0.2 million (pretax) was charged to discontinued operations.
- (9)
- Includes a gain from debt retirement of $6.2 million.
- (10)
- Gross profit from merchandise sales includes the cost of products sold, buying, warehousing and store occupancy costs. Gross profit from service revenue includes the cost of installed products sold, buying, warehousing, service payroll and related employee benefits and occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs and maintenance and depreciation and amortization expenses. Our gross profit may not be comparable to those of our competitors due to differences in industry practice regarding the classification of certain costs.
- (11)
- Return on average stockholders' equity is calculated by dividing net earnings (loss) for the period by average stockholders' equity for the year.
ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
The following discussion and analysis explains the results of our operations for fiscal 2013 and 2012 and developments affecting our financial condition as of February 1, 2014. This discussion and analysis below should be read in conjunction with Item 6 "Selected Consolidated Financial Data," and our consolidated financial statements and the notes included elsewhere in this report. The discussion and analysis contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward looking statements include management's expectations regarding implementation of its long-term strategic plan, future financial performance, automotive aftermarket trends, levels of competition, business development activities, future capital expenditures, financing sources and availability and the effects of regulation and litigation. Actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward looking statements due to a number of factors beyond our control, including those set forth under the section entitled "Item 1A Risk Factors" elsewhere in this report.
Introduction
The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack and subsidiaries (the "Company") has been the best place to shop and care for your car since it began operations in 1921. Approximately 19,000 associates are focused on delivering the best customer service in the automotive aftermarket to our customers across our nearly 800 locations located throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. Pep Boys satisfies all of a customer's automotive needs through our unique offering of service, tires, parts and accessories.
Our stores are organized into a hub and spoke network consisting of Supercenters and Service & Tire Centers. Supercenters average approximately 20,000 square feet (our new Supercenter format is approximately 14,000 square feet) and combine do-it-for-me service labor, installed merchandise and tire offerings ("DIFM") with do-it-yourself parts and accessories ("DIY"). Most of our Supercenters
19
also have a commercial sales program that delivers parts, tires and equipment to automotive repair shops and dealers. Service & Tire Centers, which average approximately 5,000 square feet, provide DIFM services in neighborhood locations that are conveniently located where our customers live or work. Service & Tire Centers are designed to capture market share and leverage our existing Supercenters and support infrastructure. We also operate a handful of legacy DIY only Pep Express stores.
In fiscal 2013, we opened or acquired 40 new Service & Tire Centers and seven new Supercenters and converted two Supercenters into Service & Tire Centers. We also closed two Service & Tire Centers and four Supercenters. As of February 1, 2014, we operated 568 Supercenters, 225 Service & Tire Centers and six Pep Express stores located in 35 states and Puerto Rico.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Net earnings for fiscal 2013 were $6.9 million, or $0.13 per share, as compared to $12.8 million, or $0.24 per share, reported for fiscal 2012. Excluding certain unusual items, the year over year profitability remained relatively flat as a decrease in total gross profit (due to 52 weeks of sales in fiscal 2013 versus 53 weeks in fiscal 2012) and higher selling, general and administrative expenses were offset by reduced interest expense.
Excluding the fifty-third week in 2012, total revenues increased by 0.6%, or $11.9 million, as compared to the same period in the prior year due to increased contribution from our non-comparable store locations partially offset by a 1.3% decline in comparable store sales (sales generated by locations in operation during the same period of the prior year). This decrease in comparable store sales was comprised of a 1.6% increase in comparable store service revenue offset by a 2.1% decrease in comparable store merchandise sales.
We believe that the industry fundamentals of increasing vehicle complexity and customer preference for DIFM remain solid over the long-term resulting in consistent demand for maintenance and repair services. Consistent with this long-term trend, we have adopted a long-term strategy of growing our automotive service business, while maintaining our DIY customer base by offering the newest and broadest product assortment in the automotive aftermarket.
In the short-term, however, various factors within the economy affect both our customers and our industry, including the impact of the recent recession, continued high unemployment/underemployment and the restoration of payroll taxes to previous levels. Another macroeconomic factor affecting our customers and our industry is gasoline prices. Gasoline prices have not only increased to historical highs in recent years, but have also experienced significant spikes in prices during each year. We believe that these gasoline price trends challenge our customer's spending relative to discretionary and deferrable purchases. In addition, gasoline prices impact miles driven which, in turn, impact sales of our services and non-discretionary products. Recently, gasoline prices have been declining which should increase miles driven. We are encouraged that during calendar year 2013, miles driven, which favorably impacts sales of our services and non-discretionary products, grew 0.6%. However, given the nature of these macroeconomic factors, we cannot predict whether or for how long these trends may continue, nor can we predict to what degree these trends will affect us in the future.
Our primary response to fluctuations in customer demand is to adjust our product assortment, store staffing and advertising messages. We work continuously to make it easy for customers to choose us to do it for them and to expand our online efforts to make Pep Boys the most convenient place to shop for all of their automotive needs. As a result, sales from service appointments made online, tires purchased on-line and installed in our service bays and products purchased online for store pick up or home delivery grew 142% in fiscal 2013. In addition, our more focused customer-centered strategy to ensure that Pep Boys is the best place to shop and care for your car is beginning to take hold. In fiscal 2013, it led to increased customer traffic in our service center line of business. We are optimistic that our efforts to build long lasting relationships with all of our customers, along with offering solutions for all of their automotive needs, will yield consistent sales growth in all lines of business.
20
For fiscal 2013 and beyond, we focused our efforts on ensuring that Pep Boys is the best place to shop and care for your car and have moved our entire business model towards a more focused customer centered strategy. See "ITEM 1 BUSINESS—BUSINESS STRATEGY."
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion explains the material changes in our results of operations for the years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012.
Analysis of Statement of Operations
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, certain items in the consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of total revenues (except as otherwise provided) and the percentage change in dollar amounts of such items compared to the indicated prior period. Percentage changes are reflected as favorable or (unfavorable).
| Percentage of Total Revenues | Percentage Change | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year ended | Feb 1, 2014 (Fiscal 2013) | Feb 2, 2013 (Fiscal 2012) | Jan 28, 2012 (Fiscal 2011) | Fiscal 2013 vs. Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2012 vs. Fiscal 2011 | |||||||||||
Merchandise sales | 77.8 | % | 78.6 | % | 79.6 | % | (2.1 | )% | 0.1 | % | ||||||
Service revenue(1) | 22.2 | 21.4 | 20.4 | 2.5 | 6.2 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | (1.2 | ) | 1.3 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Costs of merchandise sales(2) | 68.9 | (3) | 70.6 | (3) | 70.3 | (3) | 4.5 | (0.5 | ) | |||||||
Costs of service revenue(2) | 102.8 | (3) | 98.3 | (3) | 95.0 | (3) | (7.2 | ) | (9.9 | ) | ||||||
Total costs of revenues | 76.4 | 76.5 | 75.3 | 1.3 | (2.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Gross profit from merchandise sales | 31.1 | (3) | 29.4 | (3) | 29.7 | (3) | 3.4 | (0.9 | ) | |||||||
Gross (loss) profit from service revenue | (2.8 | )(3) | 1.7 | (3) | 5.0 | (3) | (271.8 | ) | (64.2 | ) | ||||||
Total gross profit | 23.6 | 23.5 | 24.7 | (0.8 | ) | (3.5 | ) | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 22.5 | 22.2 | 21.5 | (0.3 | ) | (4.4 | ) | |||||||||
Pension settlement expense | — | 0.9 | — | 100.0 | (100.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) gain from disposition of assets | — | 0.1 | — | (117.2 | ) | 4772.6 | ||||||||||
Operating profit | 1.1 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 91.3 | (82.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Merger termination fees, net | — | 2.1 | — | (100.0 | ) | 100.0 | ||||||||||
Non-operating income | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | (11.1 | ) | (13.5 | ) | |||||||||
Interest expense | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 56.5 | (29.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 0.5 | 1.1 | 2.0 | (58.7 | ) | (45.9 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax expense | 24.1 | (4) | 41.5 | (4) | 30.0 | (4) | 76.1 | (25.0 | ) | |||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.4 | (46.4 | ) | (54.8 | ) | |||||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax | — | — | — | 45.5 | 53.0 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.4 | (46.4 | ) | (55.7 | ) | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Service revenue consists of the labor charge for installing merchandise or maintaining or repairing vehicles, excluding the sale of any installed parts or materials.
21
- (2)
- Costs of merchandise sales include the cost of products sold, buying, warehousing and store occupancy costs. Costs of service revenue include service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs and maintenance and depreciation and amortization expenses.
- (3)
- As a percentage of related sales or revenue, as applicable.
- (4)
- As a percentage of earnings from continuing operations before income taxes.
Fiscal 2013 vs. Fiscal 2012
Total revenue for fiscal 2013 decreased by $24.2 million, or 1.2%, to $2,066.6 million from $2,090.7 million for fiscal 2012. Excluding the fifty-third week in 2012, total revenue increased by $11.9 million, or 0.6%, while comparable sales decreased 1.3%. The decrease in comparable store sales was comprised of a 1.6% comparable service revenue increase offset by a 2.1% comparable merchandise sales decline. The decrease in comparable merchandise sales was primarily due to lower tires, oil and refrigerant sales. While our total revenues are favorably impacted by the opening of new stores, a new store is not added to our comparable store sales until it reaches its 13th month of operation.
Our total online sales are currently an immaterial portion of our total sales and comparable store sales. Customer online purchases that are picked up at our stores are included in our comparable store sales calculation. Customer online purchases that are delivered to customers' homes are not included in our comparable store sales.
Total merchandise sales decreased 2.1%, or $35.3 million, to $1,608.7 million for fiscal 2013, compared to $1,643.9 million for fiscal 2012. Excluding the fifty-third week in 2012, total merchandise sales declined 0.5%, or $7.6 million, while comparable merchandise sales decreased by 2.1%, or $34.1 million. Our non-comparable stores contributed an additional $26.5 million of merchandise revenue in fiscal 2013. The decrease in comparable store merchandise sales was driven primarily by lower tire, oil and refrigerant sales.
Total service revenue increased 2.5%, or $11.1 million, to $457.9 million for fiscal 2013 from $446.8 million for fiscal 2012. Excluding the fifty-third week in 2012, total service revenue increased 4.5%, or $19.6 million, while comparable service revenue increased by 1.6%, or $6.9 million. Our non-comparable store locations contributed an additional $12.7 million of service revenues in fiscal 2013. The increase in comparable store service revenue was primarily due to an increase in the average transaction amount per customer.
In our retail business, we believe that the difficult macroeconomic conditions continue to impact our customers and led to the comparable store customer counts decline of 4.9%, while we experienced an increase in the average transaction amount per customer resulting from higher selling prices of 1.8%. In our service business, we believe that we experienced a slight increase in comparable store customer counts due to the strength of our service offering and our promotion of oil changes. However, this shift in service sales mix towards lower cost oil changes slightly reduced the average transaction amount per service customer.
Total gross profit decreased by $4.1 million, or 0.8%, to $487.4 million for fiscal 2013 from $491.5 million for fiscal 2012. Total gross profit margin increased to 23.6% for fiscal 2013 from 23.5% for fiscal 2012. Total gross profit for fiscal 2013 and 2012 included an asset impairment charge of $7.7 million and $10.6 million, respectively. Excluding this item from both years, total gross profit margin remained relatively flat at 24.0%.
Gross profit from merchandise sales increased by $16.4 million, or 3.4%, to $500.3 million for fiscal 2013 from $484.0 million for fiscal 2012. Gross profit margin from merchandise sales increased to
22
31.1% for fiscal 2013 from 29.4% in fiscal 2012. Gross profit from merchandise sales in fiscal 2013 and 2012 included an asset impairment charge of $2.3 million and $5.1 million, respectively. Excluding this item from both years, gross profit margin from merchandise sales improved to 31.3% in fiscal 2013 from 29.8% in the prior year. The improvement over the prior year was primarily due to improved product margins in tires, brakes, batteries and oil.
Gross margin loss from service revenue for fiscal 2013 widened by $20.5 million to a loss of $13.0 million from profit of $7.5 million for fiscal 2012. In accordance with GAAP, service revenue is limited to labor sales (excludes any revenue from installed parts and materials) and costs of service revenues includes the fully loaded service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs (rents, utilities and building maintenance). Excluding impairment charges of $5.3 million and $5.4 million in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively, gross margin from service revenue decreased by 460 basis points to a 1.7% loss in fiscal 2013 from 2.9% profit in fiscal 2012. The decrease in service revenue gross profit margin was primarily due to higher payroll and related expense of 320 basis points and higher occupancy costs of 154 basis points (depreciation and rent).
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased to 22.5% for fiscal year 2013 from 22.2% for fiscal 2012. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2013 increased $1.4 million, or 0.3%, to $464.9 million from $463.4 million for fiscal 2012. The increase as a percentage of sales reflects de-leveraging of selling, general and administrative expenses through reduced sales in fiscal 2013(fiscal 2012 included 53 weeks).
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, in accordance with Internal Revenue Service and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation requirements, we contributed $14.1 million to fully fund our Defined Benefit Pension Plan on a termination basis and incurred a settlement charge of $17.8 million (see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we sold our regional administration building in Los Angeles, CA, which resulted in a gain from disposition of assets, net of expenses, of $1.3 million.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we terminated our proposed "go private" transaction and recorded the settlement proceeds, net of merger related costs, of $42.8 million in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
Interest expense for fiscal 2013 was $14.8 million, a decrease of $19.2 million, from $34.0 million reported for fiscal 2012. Excluding refinancing costs of $0.4 million and $11.2 million in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively, interest declined by $8.4 million and reflects a lower interest rate on reduced total debt outstanding. In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we refinanced our long term debt to reduce the amount outstanding by $95.1 million and in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we further reduced the interest rate on our Senior Secured Term Loan by 75 basis points (See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Our income tax expense for fiscal 2013 was $2.2 million, or an effective rate of 24.1%, as compared to an expense of $9.3 million, or an effective rate of 41.5%, for fiscal 2012. The decrease in rate from period to period was primarily driven by a reduction in pre-tax income in relation to certain permanent tax items and tax credits. In addition, the rate was impacted by a change in foreign tax law enacted during fiscal 2013 and a favorable adjustment to deferred tax assets in our foreign operations.
As a result of the foregoing, we had net earnings of $6.9 million for fiscal 2013 as compared to net earnings of $12.8 million for fiscal 2012. Our diluted earnings per share were $0.13 as compared to $0.24 in the prior year period.
23
Fiscal 2012 vs. Fiscal 2011
Total revenue for fiscal 2012 increased by $27.1 million, or 1.3%, to $2,090.7 million from $2,063.6 million for fiscal 2011. Excluding the fifty-third week in 2012, comparable sales decreased 2.0%, consisting of a 1.3% comparable service revenue increase offset by a 2.9% comparable merchandise sales decline. Total comparable store sales decreased primarily due to lower customer counts partially offset by an increase in the average transaction amount per customer. While our total revenues were favorably impacted by the opening of new stores, a new store is not added to our comparable store sales until it reaches its 13th month of operation. The additional week of fiscal 2012 and non-comparable stores contributed an additional $68.2 million of total revenue in fiscal 2012 as compared to the prior year.
Total merchandise sales increased 0.1%, or $1.2 million, to $1,643.9 million for fiscal 2012, compared to $1,642.8 million for fiscal 2011. Excluding the fifty-third week in 2012, comparable merchandise sales decreased by 2.9%, or $46.6 million. The decrease in comparable store merchandise sales was driven primarily by lower comparable store customer counts partially offset by a higher average transaction amount per customer and was comprised of a 4.4% decline in merchandise sold through our retail business and a 0.3% decrease in merchandise sold through our service business (resulting primarily from lower tire sales). The fifty third week and our non-comparable stores contributed an additional $47.8 million of merchandise sales.
Total service revenue increased 6.2%, or $25.9 million, to $446.8 million for fiscal 2012 from $420.9 million for fiscal 2011. Excluding the fifty-third week in 2012, comparable service revenue increased by 1.3%, or $5.6 million. The increase in comparable store service revenue was due to higher customer counts partially offset by a decrease in the average transaction amount per customer. The fifty third week and our non-comparable stores contributed an additional $20.4 million of service revenue.
In our retail business, we believe that the difficult macroeconomic conditions continue to impact our customers and led to the comparable store customer counts decline, while we experienced an increase in the average transaction amount per customer resulting from higher selling prices. In our service business, we believe that we experienced an increase in comparable store customer counts due to the strength of our service offering and our promotion of oil changes. However, this shift in service sales mix towards lower cost oil changes reduced the average transaction amount per service customer.
Total gross profit decreased by $18.0 million, or 3.5%, to $491.5 million for fiscal 2012 from $509.5 million for fiscal 2011. Total gross profit margin decreased to 23.5% for fiscal 2012 from 24.7% for fiscal 2011. Total gross profit for fiscal 2012 and 2011 included an asset impairment charge of $10.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively. In addition, fiscal 2011 included a $1.1 million reduction in the reserve for excess inventory. Excluding these items from both years, total gross profit margin decreased by 70 basis points to 24.0% for fiscal 2012 from 24.7% for fiscal 2011. This decrease in total gross profit margin was primarily due to higher payroll and related expenses as a percent of total sales. In addition, the new Service & Tire Centers have a higher concentration of their sales in lower margin tires and oil changes, are leased facilities and are subject to a full payroll burden from their first day of operation. The Service & Tire Centers (exclusive of the impairment charge) reduced total margins by 180 basis points and 100 basis points in 2012 and 2011, respectively. While the new Service & Tire Centers have had a negative impact on total gross profit margin, these Service & Tire Centers positively contributed to total gross profit in both years.
Gross profit from merchandise sales decreased by $4.5 million, or 0.9%, to $484.0 million for fiscal 2012 from $488.4 million for fiscal 2011. Gross profit margin from merchandise sales decreased to 29.4% for fiscal 2012 from 29.7% in fiscal 2011. Gross profit from merchandise sales in fiscal 2012 and 2011 included an asset impairment charge of $5.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively. In addition, fiscal 2011 included a $1.1 million reduction in the reserve for excess inventory. Excluding these items
24
from both years, gross profit margin from merchandise sales remained relatively flat year over year at 29.7%.
Gross profit from service revenue decreased by $13.5 million, or 64.0%, to $7.5 million for fiscal 2012 from $21.1 million for fiscal 2011. Gross profit margin from service revenue decreased to 1.7% for fiscal 2012 from 5.0% for fiscal 2011. In accordance with GAAP, service revenue is limited to labor sales (excludes any revenue from installed parts and materials) and costs of service revenues includes the fully loaded service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. Gross profit from service revenue for fiscal 2012 and 2011 included an asset impairment charge of $5.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Excluding the asset impairment charge, gross profit margin from service revenue decreased by 234 basis points to 2.9% for fiscal 2012 from 5.3% for fiscal 2011. The decrease in service revenue gross profit margin was primarily due to the growth of our Service & Tire Centers, which lowered margins by 674 and 579 basis points in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. Excluding the impact of the Service & Tire Centers, gross profit margin from service revenue decreased to 9.7% for fiscal 2012 from 11.0% for fiscal 2011. This decrease was due to increased store occupancy costs such as rent and related expenses and utilities.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased to 22.2% for fiscal year 2012 from 21.5% for fiscal 2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2012 increased $19.4 million, or 4.4%, to $463.4 million from $444.0 million for fiscal 2011. The increase resulted primarily from higher media expense of $8.4 million, higher store and administrative payroll and related expense of $10.4 million (partially from the additional week in fiscal 2012) and higher legal and professional services costs of $2.3 million, which were partially offset by lower credit card transaction fees of $3.6 million and the reversal of compensation expense of $0.9 million related to previously issued performance based stock grants. In addition, in fiscal 2011 we recorded a reduction to the contingent consideration of $0.7 million related to one of our acquisitions.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we terminated our proposed "go private" transaction and recorded the settlement proceeds, net of merger related costs, of $42.8 million in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we restructured our long term debt to reduce the amount outstanding by $95.1 million and lower our annual interest expense by approximately $11.0 million. Accordingly, the write-off of deferred financing costs along with the cost to settle the interest rate swap on the previous debt, partially offset by our lower total debt and reduced interest rate, caused our interest expense for fiscal 2012 to increase by $7.7 million to $34.0 million as compared to the $26.3 million for fiscal 2011 (See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we sold our regional administration building in Los Angeles, CA, which resulted in a net gain from disposition of assets to increase by $1.3 million in fiscal 2012.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, in accordance with Internal Revenue Service and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation requirements, we contributed $14.1 million to fully fund its Defined Benefit Pension Plan on a termination basis and incurred a settlement charge of $17.8 million (see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Our income tax expense for fiscal 2012 was $9.3 million, or an effective rate of 41.5%, as compared to an expense of $12.5 million, or an effective rate of 30.0%, for fiscal 2011. The change was primarily due to a benefit of $3.6 million related to the release of valuation allowances on certain state net operating loss carry forwards and credits in fiscal 2011. In addition, the rate change from period to period is primarily driven by a reduction in ordinary income or loss in relation to foreign taxes in our Puerto Rico operations, state taxes, and other certain permanent tax items.
25
As a result of the foregoing, we reported net earnings of $12.8 million for fiscal 2012 as compared to net earnings of $28.9 million for fiscal 2012. Our diluted earnings per share were $0.24 as compared to $0.54 in the prior year period.
Discontinued Operations
The analysis of our results of continuing operations excludes the operating results of closed stores, where the customer base could not be maintained, which have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Industry Comparison
We operate in the U.S. automotive aftermarket, which has two general lines of business: (1) the Service business, defined as Do-It-For-Me (service labor, installed merchandise and tires) and (2) the Retail business, defined as Do-It-Yourself (retail merchandise) and commercial. Generally, specialized automotive retailers focus on either the Service or Retail area of the business. We believe that operation in both the Service and Retail areas differentiates us from our competitors. Although we manage our store performance at a store level in the aggregate, we believe that the following presentation, which includes the reclassification of revenue from merchandise that we install in customer vehicles to service center revenue, shows an accurate comparison against competitors within the two sales arenas. We compete in the Retail area of the business through our retail sales floor and commercial sales business. Our Service Center business competes in the Service area of the industry. The following table presents the revenues and gross profit for each area of the business.
| Fiscal Year ended | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||||
Service center revenue(1) | $ | 1,110,958 | $ | 1,095,284 | $ | 1,038,714 | ||||
Retail sales(2) | 955,610 | 995,446 | 1,024,913 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | $ | 2,066,568 | $ | 2,090,730 | $ | 2,063,627 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit from service center revenue(3) | $ | 209,853 | $ | 208,795 | $ | 220,314 | ||||
Gross profit from retail sales(4) | 277,524 | 282,705 | 289,213 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total gross profit | $ | 487,377 | $ | 491,500 | $ | 509,527 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Includes revenues from installed products.
- (2)
- Excludes revenues from installed products.
- (3)
- Gross profit from service center revenue includes the cost of installed products sold, buying, warehousing, service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs and maintenance and depreciation and amortization expenses.
- (4)
- Gross profit from retail sales includes the cost of products sold, buying, warehousing and store occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs and maintenance and depreciation and amortization expenses.
CAPITAL & LIQUIDITY
Capital Resources and Needs
Our cash requirements arise principally from (i) the purchase of inventory and capital expenditures related to existing and new stores, offices and distribution centers, (ii) debt service and (iii) contractual
26
obligations. Cash flows realized through the sale of automotive services, tires, parts and accessories are our primary source of liquidity. Net cash provided by operating activities was $59.4 million in fiscal 2013, as compared to $88.5 million in the prior year. The $29.1 million decrease was due to an unfavorable change in operating assets and liabilities of $13.8 million and a decrease in net earnings, net of non-cash adjustments of $15.5 million. The change in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to unfavorable changes in accrued expenses and other current assets of $10.3 million and other long-term liabilities of $6.8 million, partially offset by a favorable change in inventory, net of accounts payable, of $3.3 million. The decline in net earnings, net of non-cash adjustments, was primarily due to $42.8 million of merger termination fees recorded in the second quarter of 2012, partially offset by $11.2 million of refinancing costs and the $17.8 million pension settlement charge recorded in the third and fourth quarter of 2012, respectively.
The unfavorable change in accrued expenses and other current assets was primarily due to a decrease in employee payroll and related benefit accruals of $8.4 million due to the timing of payments to employees and taxing authorities.
Taking into consideration changes in our trade payable program liability (shown as cash flows from financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows), cash used in accounts payable was $11.5 million in fiscal 2013 as compared to cash generated from accounts payable of $65.5 million for fiscal 2012. The ratio of accounts payable, including our trade payable program, to inventory was 57.4% at February 1, 2014 and 61.5% at February 2, 2013. The $31.1 million increase in inventory from February 2, 2013 was primarily due to investment in our new stores, strategic initiatives like our speed shops and Superhub concepts, and new product offerings.
Cash used in investing activities was $65.3 million in fiscal 2013 as compared to $52.8 million in the prior year period. Capital expenditures, including the acquisition of 18 Service and Tire Centers in Southern California for $10.7 million, were $64.7 million for fiscal 2013. Our fiscal 2013 capital expenditures also include the addition of 29 new locations, the conversion of 11 Supercenters into Superhubs, the addition of 63 Speed Shops within existing Supercenters and required expenditures for existing stores, offices and distribution centers. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2012 of $54.7 million included the addition of 20 Service & Tire Centers, six Supercenters, the conversion of seven Supercenters into Superhubs, the addition of 17 Speed Shops within existing Supercenters, and information technology enhancements including our eCommerce initiatives and parts catalog enhancements. In fiscal 2012, we sold our regional administrative office in Los Angeles, CA for approximately $5.6 million, net of closing costs. In addition, during fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 we invested, net of funds released, $0.7 million and $3.7 million, respectively, in a restricted account as collateral for retained liabilities included within existing insurance programs in lieu of previously outstanding letters of credit.
Our targeted capital expenditures for fiscal 2014 are $80.0 million, which includes the planned addition of 30 Service & Tire Centers, three Supercenters, the addition of 25 speed shops within existing Supercenters, and the conversion of 41 stores to the new "Road Ahead" format. These expenditures are expected to be funded from cash on hand and net cash generated from operating activities. Additional capacity, if needed, exists under our existing line of credit.
Cash used in financing activities was $19.8 million and $34.8 million in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. The cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2013 was primarily related to net payments under our trade payable program of $19.9 million as compared to net borrowings of $64.5 million in the corresponding period of the prior year. The trade payable program is funded by various bank participants who have the ability, but not the obligation, to purchase, directly from our suppliers, account receivables owed by Pep Boys. In the second quarter of 2013, we increased the availability under our trade payable program from $175.0 million to $200.0 million. As of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, we had an outstanding balance of $129.8 million and $149.7 million, respectively
27
(classified as trade payable program liability on the consolidated balance sheet). In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $50.0 million of our common stock. During fiscal 2013, we had common stock repurchases of $2.8 million plus principal payments of $2.0 million on our amended and restated Senior Secured Term Loan ("Term Loan"), that were offset by increased borrowings of $3.5 million on our revolving credit facility.
During fiscal 2012, we had common stock repurchases of $0.3 million. In addition, during the third quarter of 2012, we increased the amount of our borrowing under our Term Loan from $150.0 million to $200.0 million and used those proceeds together with cash on hand to repay, in full, the $147.0 million principal amount then outstanding under our 7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 and to settle our outstanding interest rate swap (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). As a result of the refinancing, we reduced our total debt by $95.1 million and extended its maturity to 2018. The Company recorded $6.5 million of deferred financing costs related to this refinancing. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company further amended the Term loan by reducing the interest rate by 75 basis points. The Company recorded $0.8 million of deferred financing costs related to this amendment. The reduction in the interest rate is anticipated to result in approximately $1.5 million in annualized interest savings.
We anticipate that cash on hand and cash generated by operating activities will exceed our expected cash requirements in fiscal 2014. In addition, we expect to have excess availability under our existing revolving credit agreement during the entirety of fiscal 2014. As of February 1, 2014, we had availability on our revolving credit facility of $161.4 million. As of February 1, 2014 we had $33.4 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Our working capital was $131.0 million and $126.5 million at February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively. Our total debt, net of cash on hand, as a percentage of our net capitalization, was 23.5% and 20.8% at February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively.
Contractual Obligations
The following chart represents our total contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of February 1, 2014:
Contractual Obligations | Total | Within 1 year | From 1 to 3 years | From 3 to 5 years | After 5 years | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollars amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt(1) | $ | 201,500 | $ | 2,000 | $ | 7,500 | $ | 192,000 | — | |||||||
Operating leases | 770,622 | 111,025 | 199,813 | 165,249 | 294,535 | |||||||||||
Expected scheduled interest payments on long-term debt | 41,961 | 9,080 | 17,903 | 14,978 | — | |||||||||||
Other long-term obligations(2) | 13,062 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total contractual obligations | $ | 1,027,145 | $ | 122,105 | $ | 225,216 | $ | 372,227 | $ | 294,535 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Long-term debt includes current maturities.
- (2)
- Comprised of deferred compensation items of $5.4 million, income tax liabilities of $1.5 million and asset retirement obligations of $6.2 million. The above table does not reflect the timing of projected settlements for our recorded deferred compensation plan obligation, asset retirement obligation costs and income tax liabilities because we cannot make a reliable estimate of the timing of the related cash payments.
28
Commercial Commitments | Total | Within 1 year | From 1 to 3 years | From 3 to 5 years | After 5 years | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollar amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Commercial letters of credit | $ | 13,959 | $ | 13,959 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Standby letters of credit | 30,872 | 30,752 | 120 | — | — | |||||||||||
Surety bonds | 10,581 | 8,514 | 2,067 | — | — | |||||||||||
Purchase obligations(1)(2) | 46,127 | 23,685 | 22,442 | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total commercial commitments | $ | 101,539 | $ | 76,910 | $ | 24,629 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Our open purchase orders are based on current inventory or operational needs and are fulfilled by our suppliers within short periods of time. We currently do not have minimum purchase commitments under our supply agreements (other than(2) below) and generally, our open purchase orders (orders that have not been shipped) are not binding agreements. Those purchase obligations that are in transit from our suppliers at February 1, 2014 that we do not have legal title to are considered commercial commitments.
- (2)
- In fiscal 2013, we renewed our commercial commitment to purchase 6.3 million units of oil products at various prices over a three-year period. Based on our present consumption rate, we expect to meet the cumulative minimum purchase requirements under this contract in fiscal 2016.
Senior Secured Term Loan due October 2018
On October 11, 2012, we entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other parties thereto that (i) increased the size of our Senior Secured Term Loan (the "Term Loan") to $200.0 million, (ii) extended the maturity of the Term Loan from October 27, 2013 to October 11, 2018, (iii) reset the interest rate under the Term Loan to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), subject to a floor of 1.25%, plus 3.75% and (iv) added an additional 16 of our owned locations to the collateral pool securing the Term Loan. The amended and restated Term Loan is deemed to be substantially different than the prior Term Loan, and therefore the modification of the debt has been treated as a debt extinguishment.
Net proceeds from the amended and restated Term Loan together with cash on hand were used to settle the outstanding interest rate swap on the Term Loan as structured prior to its amendment and restatement and to satisfy and discharge all of our outstanding 7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes ("Notes") due 2014. The settlement of the interest rate swap resulted in the reclassification of $7.5 million of accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense. We recognized, in interest expense, $1.9 million of deferred financing costs related to the Notes and the Term Loan as structured prior to its amendment and restatement. The interest payment and the swap settlement payment are presented within cash flows from operations on the consolidated statement of cash flows.
On November 12, 2013, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The First Amendment reduced the interest rate payable by the Company from (i) LIBOR, subject to a 1.25% floor, plus 3.75% to (ii) LIBOR, subject to a 1.25% floor, plus 3.00%. The reduction in the interest rate is anticipated to result in approximately $1.5 million in annualized interest savings.
As of February 1, 2014, 142 stores collateralized the Term Loan. The amount outstanding under the Term Loan as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013 was $198.0 million and $200.0 million, respectively.
29
Revolving Credit Agreement, Through July 2016
On January 16, 2009 we entered into the Revolving Credit Agreement among the Company, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other parties thereto providing for borrowings of up to $300.0 million and having a maturity of January 2014. Total incurred fees of $6.8 million were capitalized and are being amortized over the original five year life of the facility. On July 26, 2011, we amended and restated the Revolving Credit Agreement to reduce its interest rate by 75 basis points and to extend its maturity to July 2016. Our ability to borrow under the Revolving Credit Agreement is based on a specific borrowing base consisting of inventory and accounts receivable. The interest rate on this facility is LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% to 2.50% for LIBOR rate borrowings or Prime plus 1.00% to 1.50% for Prime rate borrowings. The margin is based upon the then current availability under the facility. As of February 1, 2014, we had $3.5 million in borrowings outstanding under the facility and $44.8 million of availability was utilized to support outstanding letters of credit. Taking this into account and the borrowing base requirements (including reduction for amount outstanding under the supplier financing program), as of February 1, 2014 there was $161.4 million of availability remaining under the facility.
Other Matters
Our debt agreements require compliance with covenants. The most restrictive of these covenants, an earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") requirement, is triggered if the availability under our Revolving Credit Agreement plus unrestricted cash drops below $50.0 million. As of February 1, 2014, we were in compliance with all financial covenants contained in our debt agreements.
The weighted average interest rate on all debt borrowings during fiscal 2013 and 2012 was 4.9% and 5.1%, respectively.
Other Contractual Obligations
We have a supplier financing program which is funded by various bank participants who have the ability, but not the obligation, to purchase account receivables owed by us directly from our suppliers. In fiscal 2013, we increased the total availability under the program from $175.0 million to $200.0 million. There was an outstanding balance of $129.8 million and $149.7 million under this program as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively.
We have letter of credit arrangements in connection with our risk management and import merchandising programs. We had $13.9 million and $5.2 million of outstanding commercial letters of credit as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively. We were contingently liable for $30.9 million and $32.2 million in outstanding standby letters of credit as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively.
We are also contingently liable for surety bonds in the amount of approximately $10.6 million and $11.5 million as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively. The surety bonds guarantee certain of our payments (for example utilities, easement repairs, licensing requirements and customs fees).
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
We lease certain property and equipment under operating leases and lease financings which contain renewal and escalation clauses, step rent provisions, capital improvements funding and other lease concessions. These provisions are considered in the calculation of our minimum lease payments which are recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term. Any lease payments that are based upon an existing index or rate are included in our minimum lease payment
30
calculations. During the current fiscal year, in connection with the acquisitions discussed in Note 2, we assumed additional lease obligations totaling $17.4 million over an average of 10 years. Total operating lease commitments as of February 1, 2014 were $770.6 million.
Pension and Retirement Plans
On December 31, 2008, we paid $14.4 million to terminate the defined benefit portion of our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) and recorded a $6.0 million settlement charge. We continue to maintain the non-qualified defined contribution portion of the SERP plan (the "Account Plan") for key employees designated by the Board of Directors. On January 31, 2014, the Account Plan was amended to eliminate the retirement plan contributions that have historically been made by the Company effective for calendar year 2015. Our contribution expense for the Account Plan was $0.8 million, $0.1 million and $0.3 million for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
We have a qualified 401(k) savings plan and a separate savings plan for employees residing in Puerto Rico, which cover all full-time employees who are at least 21 years of age with one or more years of service. We contribute the lesser of 50% of the first 6% of a participant's contributions or 3% of the participant's compensation. For fiscal 2012 and 2011, our contributions were conditional upon the achievement of certain pre-established financial performance goals which were not met in fiscal 2012 or 2011. Employer contributions for fiscal 2013 were not conditional on any financial performance goals. Our savings plans' contribution expense was $3.5 million in fiscal 2013.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company terminated its defined benefit pension plan and contributed $14.1 million to fully fund the plan on a termination basis. Accordingly, the Company has no further defined benefit pension expense.
The expense under these plans for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $4.3 million, $19.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. See Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in "Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for further discussion of our pension plans.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to customer incentives, product returns and warranty obligations, bad debts, inventories, income taxes, financing operations, retirement benefits, share-based compensation, risk participation agreements, contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe that the following represent our more critical estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements:
- •
- Inventory is stated at lower of cost, as determined under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, or market. Our inventory, which consists primarily of automotive parts and accessories, is used on vehicles. Because of the relatively long lives of vehicles, along with our historical experience of returning most excess inventory to our suppliers for full credit, the risk of obsolescence is
31
- •
- We record reserves for future sales returns, customer incentives, warranty claims and inventory shrinkage. The reserves are based on expected returns of products and historical claims and inventory shrinkage experience. If actual experience differs from historical levels, revisions in our estimates may be required. A 10% change in these reserves at February 1, 2014 would have affected net earnings by approximately $0.8 million for fiscal 2013.
- •
- We have risk participation arrangements with respect to workers' compensation, general liability, automobile liability, other casualty coverage and health care insurance, including stop loss coverage with third party insurers to limit our total exposure. A reserve for the liabilities associated with these agreements is established using generally accepted actuarial methods followed in the insurance industry and our historical claims experience. The amounts included in our costs related to these arrangements are estimated and can vary based on changes in assumptions, claims experience or the providers included in the associated insurance programs. A 10% change in our self-insurance liabilities at February 1, 2014 would have affected net earnings by approximately $5.7 million for fiscal 2013.
- •
- At fiscal year end 2013, we had six reporting units, of which three included goodwill. We test the recorded amount of goodwill for recovery on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. Impairment reviews may also be triggered by any significant events or changes in circumstances affecting our business.
minimal. We establish a reserve for excess inventory for instances where less than full credit will be received for such returns and where we anticipate items will be sold at retail prices that are less than recorded costs. The reserve is based on management's judgment, including estimates and assumptions regarding marketability of products, the market value of inventory to be sold in future periods and on historical experiences where we received less than full credit from suppliers for product returns. If our estimates regarding excess inventory are inaccurate, we may incur losses or gains that could be material. A 10% difference in our inventory reserves as of February 1, 2014 would have affected net earnings by approximately $0.3 million in fiscal 2013.
In conducting goodwill impairment testing, for any or all reporting units at the discretion of management, we may first evaluate qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount (also known as a "step zero" analysis). A two-step quantitative assessment is performed for each reporting unit evaluated if the qualitative assessment indicates that the carrying value more likely than not exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, or if a qualitative assessment is not performed.
The first step of the quantitative evaluation is to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test must be performed in order to determine the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner that the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined. We allocate the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit, including intangible assets. Any excess of the value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. A deterioration of macroeconomic conditions may not only negatively impact the estimated operating cash flows used in our cash flow models, but may also negatively impact other assumptions used in our analyses, including, but not limited to, the estimated cost of capital and/or discount rates. Additionally, in accordance with accounting guidance, we are required to ensure that assumptions used to determine fair value in the analyses are consistent
32
- •
- We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets for indicators of impairment. Management's judgments, including judgments related to store cash flows, are based on market and operating conditions at the time of evaluation. Future events could cause management's conclusion on impairment to change, requiring an adjustment of these assets to their then current fair market value.
- •
- We have a share-based compensation plan, which includes stock options and restricted stock units, or RSUs. We account for our share-based compensation plans on a fair value basis. We determine the fair value of our stock options at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The RSUs are awarded at a price equal to the market price of our underlying stock on the date of the grant. In situations where we have granted stock options, performance share units ("PSUs") and RSUs, we have used Monte Carlo simulations in estimating the fair value of the award. The pricing model and generally accepted valuation techniques require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to determine the fair value of our awards. These assumptions and judgments include the expected life of stock options, expected stock price volatility, future employee stock option exercise behaviors and the estimate of award forfeitures. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to determine stock-based compensation expense. However, if actual results are different from these assumptions, the share-based compensation expense reported in our financial statements may not be representative of the actual economic cost of the share-based compensation. In addition, significant changes in these assumptions could materially impact our share-based compensation expense on future awards. A 10% change in our share-based compensation expense for fiscal 2013 would have affected net earnings by approximately $0.2 million.
- •
- We are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This requires us to estimate our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as depreciation of property and equipment and valuation of inventories, for tax and accounting purposes. We determine our provision for income taxes based on federal and state tax laws and regulations currently in effect. Legislation changes currently proposed by certain states in which we operate, if enacted, could increase our transactions or activities subject to tax. Any such legislation that becomes law could result in an increase in our state income tax expense and our state income taxes paid, which could have a material effect on our net earnings.
with the assumptions a market participant would use. As a result, the cost of capital and/or discount rates used may increase or decrease based on market conditions and trends, regardless of whether our cost of capital has changed. Therefore we may recognize an impairment even though cash flows are approximately the same or greater than forecasted amounts.
There were no impairments as a result of our annual tests in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013, fiscal year 2012, and fiscal year 2011.
At any one time our tax returns for many tax years are subject to examination by U.S. Federal, commonwealth, and state taxing jurisdictions. For income tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized in the financial statements unless it is more-likely-than-not to be sustained. We adjust these tax liabilities, as well as the related interest and penalties, based on the latest facts and circumstances, including recently published rulings, court cases, and outcomes of tax audits. To the extent our actual tax liability differs from our established tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, our effective tax rate may be materially
33
impacted. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome of, the timing of, or the tax treatment of any particular tax position or deduction, we believe that our tax balances reflect the more-likely-than-not outcome of known tax contingencies.
The temporary differences between the book and tax treatment of income and expenses result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. To the extent we believe that recovery is not more-likely-than-not, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change the allowance in a future period, income tax expense will be impacted. Actual results could differ from this assessment if adequate taxable income is not generated in future periods from either operations or projected tax planning strategies.
RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists" ("ASU 2013-11"). ASU 2013-11 states that an unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, if available at the reporting date under the applicable tax law to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position. If the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, "Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2013-02"), which requires companies to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") by component. In addition, companies are required to report significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI by the respective line items of net income if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, companies are required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail on those amounts. ASU 2013-02 does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements, and is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We have market rate exposure in our financial instruments due to changes in interest rates and prices.
Variable and Fixed Rate Debt
Our primary market risk exposure with regard to financial instruments is due to changes in interest rates. Pursuant to the terms of our Revolving Credit Agreement, changes in daily LIBOR could affect the rates at which we could borrow funds thereunder. At February 1, 2014, there was $3.5 million in outstanding borrowings under the agreement. Additionally, we have a $200.0 million Term Loan that was amended on November 12, 2013 to reduce the interest rate payable by the Company from LIBOR, subject to a 1.25% floor, plus 3.75% to LIBOR, subject to a 1.25% floor, plus 3.00%. Excluding our
34
interest rate swap, a one percent change in the LIBOR rate would have affected net earnings by approximately $1.5 million for fiscal 2013. The risks related to changes in the LIBOR rate are substantially mitigated by our interest rate swap.
The fair value of our long-term debt including current maturities was $203.7 million at February 1, 2014. We determine fair value on our fixed rate debt by using quoted market prices and current interest rates.
Interest Rate Swaps
On October 11, 2012, we settled our interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge on $145.0 million of our Term Loan prior to its amendment and restatement. The swap was used to minimize interest rate exposure and overall interest costs by converting the variable component of the total interest rate to a fixed rate of 5.036%. Since February 1, 2008, this swap was deemed to be fully effective and all adjustments in the interest rate swap's fair value have been recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss. The settlement of this swap resulted in an interest charge of $7.5 million, which was previously recorded within accumulated other comprehensive loss.
On October 11, 2012, we entered into two new interest rate swaps for a notional amount of $50.0 million each that together are designated as a cash flow hedge on the first $100.0 million of the amended and restated Term Loan. The interest rate swaps convert the variable LIBOR portion of the interest payments, subject to a floor of 1.25%, due on the first $100.0 million of the Term Loan to a fixed rate of 1.855%.
As of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, the fair value of the new interest rate swaps was a net $0.6 million asset and a $1.6 million payable, respectively. The swap value is recorded within other long-term assets or other long-term liabilities on the balance sheet.
35
ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended February 1, 2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack and subsidiaries as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended February 1, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 17, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 17, 2014
36
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
| February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | |||||||
Current assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 33,431 | $ | 59,186 | |||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $1,320 and $1,302 | 25,152 | 23,897 | |||||
Merchandise inventories | 672,354 | 641,208 | |||||
Prepaid expenses | 29,282 | 28,908 | |||||
Other current assets | 63,405 | 60,438 | |||||
Assets held for disposal | 2,013 | — | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total current assets | 825,637 | 813,637 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Property and equipment—net of accumulated depreciation of $1,227,121 and $1,162,909 | 625,525 | 657,270 | |||||
Goodwill | 56,794 | 46,917 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 57,686 | 47,691 | |||||
Other long-term assets | 39,839 | 38,434 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 1,605,481 | $ | 1,603,949 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | |||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 256,031 | $ | 244,696 | |||
Trade payable program liability | 129,801 | 149,718 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 237,403 | 232,277 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 69,373 | 58,441 | |||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 2,000 | 2,000 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | 694,608 | 687,132 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Long-term debt less current maturities | 199,500 | 198,000 | |||||
Other long-term liabilities | 48,485 | 53,818 | |||||
Deferred gain from asset sales | 114,823 | 127,427 | |||||
Stockholders' equity: | |||||||
Common stock, par value $1 per share: authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued 68,557,041 shares | 68,557 | 68,557 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 297,009 | 295,679 | |||||
Retained earnings | 432,332 | 430,148 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 379 | (980 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost—15,358,872 shares and 15,431,298 shares | (250,212 | ) | (255,832 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Total stockholders' equity | 548,065 | 537,572 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 1,605,481 | $ | 1,603,949 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
37
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Year ended | February 1, 2014 (52 weeks) | February 2, 2013 (53 weeks) | January 28, 2012 (52 weeks) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Merchandise sales | $ | 1,608,697 | $ | 1,643,948 | $ | 1,642,757 | ||||
Service revenue | 457,871 | 446,782 | 420,870 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | 2,066,568 | 2,090,730 | 2,063,627 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Costs of merchandise sales | 1,108,359 | 1,159,994 | 1,154,322 | |||||||
Costs of service revenue | 470,832 | 439,236 | 399,776 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total costs of revenues | 1,579,191 | 1,599,230 | 1,554,098 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit from merchandise sales | 500,338 | 483,954 | 488,435 | |||||||
Gross (loss) profit from service revenue | (12,961 | ) | 7,546 | 21,094 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total gross profit | 487,377 | 491,500 | 509,529 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 464,852 | 463,416 | 443,986 | |||||||
Pension settlement expense | — | 17,753 | — | |||||||
Net (loss) gain from disposition of assets | (227 | ) | 1,323 | 27 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Operating profit | 22,298 | 11,654 | 65,570 | |||||||
Merger termination fees, net | — | 42,816 | — | |||||||
Non-operating income | 1,789 | 2,012 | 2,324 | |||||||
Interest expense | 14,797 | 33,982 | 26,306 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and discontinued operations | 9,290 | 22,500 | 41,588 | |||||||
Income tax expense | 2,237 | 9,345 | 12,460 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings from continuing operations before discontinued operations | 7,053 | 13,155 | 29,128 | |||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit of $102, $186 and $121 | (188 | ) | (345 | ) | (225 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings | 6,865 | 12,810 | 28,903 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share: | ||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before discontinued operations | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.55 | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | — | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.54 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share: | ||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before discontinued operations | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.54 | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | — | — | — | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.54 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||
Defined benefit plan adjustment, net of tax | — | 9,696 | (3,120 | ) | ||||||
Derivative financial instrument adjustment, net of tax | 1,359 | 6,973 | 2,499 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income | 1,359 | 16,669 | (621 | ) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income | $ | 8,224 | $ | 29,479 | $ | 28,282 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
38
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
| Common Stock | | | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income | | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Total Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 29, 2011 | 68,557,041 | $ | 68,557 | $ | 295,361 | $ | 402,600 | (15,971,910 | ) | $ | (271,030 | ) | $ | (17,028 | ) | $ | 478,460 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings | 28,903 | 28,903 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in net unrecognized other postretirement benefit costs, net of tax of $(1,872) | (3,120 | ) | (3,120 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair market value adjustment on derivatives, net of tax of $1,499 | 2,499 | 2,499 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income | 28,282 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($.12 per share) | (6,344 | ) | (6,344 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of stock options and related tax benefits | (900 | ) | 45,321 | 1,223 | 323 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of employee stock purchase plan | (335 | ) | 20,963 | 566 | 231 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of restricted stock unit conversions | (2,136 | ) | 70,228 | 1,897 | (239 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense | 3,237 | 3,237 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan | (487 | ) | 32,076 | 866 | 379 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, January 28, 2012 | 68,557,041 | $ | 68,557 | $ | 296,462 | $ | 423,437 | (15,803,322 | ) | $ | (266,478 | ) | $ | (17,649 | ) | $ | 504,329 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings | 12,810 | 12,810 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in net unrecognized other postretirement benefit costs, net of tax of $5,729 | 9,696 | 9,696 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair market value adjustment on derivatives, net of tax of $4,208 | 6,973 | 6,973 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income | 29,479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of stock options and related tax benefits | 375 | (5,494 | ) | 274,769 | 7,418 | 2,299 | |||||||||||||||||||
Effect of employee stock purchase plan | (605 | ) | 39,552 | 1,067 | 462 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of restricted stock unit conversions | (2,457 | ) | 92,703 | 2,503 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense | 1,299 | 1,299 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock repurchases | (35,000 | ) | (342 | ) | (342 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, February 2, 2013 | 68,557,041 | $ | 68,557 | $ | 295,679 | $ | 430,148 | (15,431,298 | ) | $ | (255,832 | ) | $ | (980 | ) | $ | 537,572 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings | 6,865 | 6,865 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair market value adjustment on derivatives, net of tax of $814 | 1,359 | 1,359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income | 8,224 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of stock options and related tax benefits | (135 | ) | (3,742 | ) | 188,652 | 5,093 | 1,216 | ||||||||||||||||||
Effect of employee stock purchase plan | (939 | ) | 62,547 | 1,688 | 749 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of restricted stock unit conversions | (1,527 | ) | 58,851 | 1,589 | 62 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense | 2,992 | 2,992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock repurchases | (237,624 | ) | (2,750 | ) | (2,750 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, February 1, 2014 | 68,557,041 | $ | 68,557 | $ | 297,009 | $ | 432,332 | (15,358,872 | ) | $ | (250,212 | ) | $ | 379 | $ | 548,065 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
39
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollar amounts in thousands)
| Year Ended | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 6,865 | $ | 12,810 | $ | 28,903 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by continuing operations: | ||||||||||
Net loss from discontinued operations | 188 | 345 | 225 | |||||||
Depreciation | 78,439 | 79,104 | 79,390 | |||||||
Amortization of deferred gain from asset sales | (12,604 | ) | (12,846 | ) | (12,602 | ) | ||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 2,993 | 4,431 | 2,538 | |||||||
Stock compensation expense | 2,992 | 1,299 | 3,237 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes | (79 | ) | 7,576 | 10,301 | ||||||
Net loss (gain) from dispositions of assets | 227 | (1,323 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||
Loss from asset impairment | 7,659 | 10,555 | 1,619 | |||||||
Other | (493 | ) | (269 | ) | (421 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effects of acquisitions: | ||||||||||
Increase in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other | (6,511 | ) | (602 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||
Increase in merchandise inventories | (31,146 | ) | (27,074 | ) | (42,756 | ) | ||||
Increase in accounts payable | 8,378 | 984 | 24,871 | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses | 6,115 | 10,481 | (18,745 | ) | ||||||
(Decrease) increase in other long-term liabilities | (3,345 | ) | 3,487 | (2,463 | ) | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by continuing operations | 59,678 | 88,958 | 73,923 | |||||||
Net cash used in discontinued operations | (274 | ) | (467 | ) | (273 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 59,404 | 88,491 | 73,650 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (53,982 | ) | (54,696 | ) | (74,746 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from dispositions of assets | 21 | 5,588 | 515 | |||||||
Additions to collateral investment | (2,312 | ) | (3,654 | ) | (7,638 | ) | ||||
Release of collateral investment | 1,650 | — | — | |||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired. | (10,694 | ) | — | (42,901 | ) | |||||
Premiums paid on life insurance policies | — | — | (837 | ) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (65,317 | ) | (52,762 | ) | (125,607 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||
Borrowings under line of credit agreements | 40,745 | 2,319 | 5,721 | |||||||
Payments under line of credit agreements | (37,245 | ) | (2,319 | ) | (5,721 | ) | ||||
Borrowings on trade payable program liability | 154,985 | 179,751 | 144,180 | |||||||
Payments on trade payable program liability | (174,902 | ) | (115,247 | ) | (115,253 | ) | ||||
Payments for finance issuance costs | (770 | ) | (6,520 | ) | (2,441 | ) | ||||
Borrowings under new debt | — | 200,000 | — | |||||||
Debt payments | (2,000 | ) | (295,122 | ) | (1,079 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid | — | — | (6,344 | ) | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (2,750 | ) | (342 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from stock issuance | 2,095 | 2,693 | 898 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (19,842 | ) | (34,787 | ) | 19,961 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (25,755 | ) | 942 | (31,996 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 59,186 | 58,244 | 90,240 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 33,431 | $ | 59,186 | $ | 58,244 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow information: | ||||||||||
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized | $ | 12,027 | $ | 31,290 | $ | 23,097 | ||||
Cash received from income tax refunds | 1,251 | 108 | 479 | |||||||
Cash paid for income taxes | 4,377 | 2,826 | 1,150 | |||||||
Non-cash investing activities: | ||||||||||
Accrued purchases of property and equipment | 3,467 | 1,371 | 1,400 |
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
40
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack and subsidiaries' (the "Company") consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). The preparation of the Company's financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales, costs and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and other related disclosures. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of the Company's assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and the Company includes any revisions to its estimates in the results for the period in which the actual amounts become known.
The Company believes the significant accounting policies described below affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, these are the policies the Company believes are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating the historical consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
BUSINESS The Company operates in the U.S. automotive aftermarket, which has two general lines of business: (1) the Service business, commonly known as Do-It-For-Me, or "DIFM" (service labor, installed merchandise and tires) and (2) the Retail business, commonly known as Do-It-Yourself, or "DIY" (retail merchandise) and commercial. The Company's primary store format is the Supercenter, which serves both "DIFM" and "DIY" customers with the highest quality service offerings and merchandise. As part of the Company's long-term strategy to lead with automotive service, the Company is complementing the existing Supercenter store base with Service & Tire Centers. These Service & Tire Centers are designed to capture market share and leverage the existing Supercenter and support infrastructure. The Company currently operates stores in 35 states and Puerto Rico.
FISCAL YEAR END The Company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to January 31. Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2011, which ended February 2, 2014 and January 28, 2012, respectively, were comprised of 52 weeks. Fiscal 2012, which ended February 2, 2013, was comprised of 53 weeks.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash equivalents include all short-term, highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less when purchased. All credit and debit card transactions that settle in less than seven days are also classified as cash and cash equivalents.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Accounts receivable are primarily comprised of amounts due from commercial customers. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on an evaluation of the credit worthiness of its customers. The allowance is reviewed for adequacy at least quarterly and adjusted as necessary. Specific accounts are written off against the allowance when management determines the account is uncollectible.
41
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
MERCHANDISE INVENTORIES Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. If the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of costing inventory had been used by the Company, inventory would have been $579.8 million and $565.8 million as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively. During fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, the effect of LIFO layer liquidations on gross profit was immaterial.
The Company's inventory, consisting primarily of automotive tires, parts, and accessories, is used on vehicles typically having long lives. Because of this, and combined with the Company's historical experience of returning excess inventory to the Company's suppliers for full credit, the risk of obsolescence is minimal. The Company establishes a reserve for excess inventory for instances where less than full credit will be received for such returns or where the Company anticipates items will be sold at retail prices that are less than recorded costs. The reserve is based on management's judgment, including estimates and assumptions regarding marketability of products, the market value of inventory to be sold in future periods and on historical experiences where the Company received less than full credit from suppliers for product returns. The Company also provides for estimated inventory shrinkage based on historical levels and the results of its cycle counting program. The Company's inventory adjustments for these matters were immaterial for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012. In future periods, the company may be exposed to material losses should the company's suppliers alter their policies with regard to accepting excess inventory returns.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: building and improvements, 5 to 40 years, and furniture, fixtures and equipment, 3 to 10 years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon retirement or sale, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated and the gain or loss, if any, is included in the determination of net income. Property and equipment information follows:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Land | $ | 202,038 | $ | 203,386 | |||
Buildings and improvements | 888,389 | 885,389 | |||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 760,170 | 728,122 | |||||
Construction in progress | 2,049 | 3,282 | |||||
Accumulated depreciation | (1,227,121 | ) | (1,162,909 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Property and equipment—net | $ | 625,525 | $ | 657,270 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
GOODWILL At fiscal year end 2013, the Company had six reporting units, of which three included goodwill. The Company tests the recorded amount of goodwill for recovery on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. Impairment reviews may also be triggered by any significant events or changes in circumstances affecting the Company's business.
In conducting goodwill impairment testing, for any or all reporting units at the discretion of management, the Company may first evaluate qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount (also known as a "step zero" analysis). A two-step quantitative assessment is performed for each reporting unit evaluated if the
42
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
qualitative assessment indicates that the carrying value more likely than not exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, or if a qualitative assessment is not performed.
The first step of the quantitative evaluation is to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test must be performed in order to determine the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner that the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined. The Company allocates the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit, including intangible assets. Any excess of the value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. A deterioration of macroeconomic conditions may not only negatively impact the estimated operating cash flows used in the Company's cash flow models, but may also negatively impact other assumptions used in the Company's analyses, including, but not limited to, the estimated cost of capital and/or discount rates. Additionally, in accordance with accounting guidance, the Company is required to ensure that assumptions used to determine fair value in the analyses are consistent with the assumptions a market participant would use. As a result, the cost of capital and/or discount rates used may increase or decrease based on market conditions and trends, regardless of whether the Company's cost of capital has changed. Therefore the Company may recognize an impairment even though cash flows are approximately the same or greater than forecasted amounts.
There were no impairments as a result of the Company's annual tests in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013, fiscal year 2012, and fiscal year 2011.
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS The Company amortizes intangible assets with finite lives on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
LEASES The Company amortizes leasehold improvements over the lesser of the lease term or the economic life of those assets. Generally, for stores the lease term is the base lease term and for distribution centers the lease term includes the base lease term plus certain renewal option periods for which renewal is reasonably assured and for which failure to exercise the renewal option would result in an economic penalty to the Company. The calculation of straight-line rent expense is based on the same lease term with consideration for step rent provisions, escalation clauses, rent holidays and other lease concessions. The Company begins expensing rent upon completion of the Company's due diligence or when the Company has the right to use the property, whichever comes earlier.
SOFTWARE CAPITALIZATION The Company capitalizes certain direct development costs associated with internal-use software, including external direct costs of material and services, and payroll costs for employees devoting time to the software projects. These costs are amortized over a period not to exceed five years beginning when the asset is substantially ready for use. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs are expensed as incurred.
43
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
TRADE PAYABLE PROGRAM LIABILITY The Company has a trade payable program which is funded by various bank participants who have the ability, but not the obligation, to purchase account receivables owed by the Company directly from its suppliers. The Company, in turn, makes the regularly scheduled full supplier payments to the bank participants.
INCOME TAXES The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes are determined based upon enacted tax laws and rates applied to the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities.
The Company recognizes taxes payable for the current year, as well as deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company's financial statements or tax returns. The Company must assess the likelihood that any recorded deferred tax assets will be recovered against future taxable income. To the extent the Company believes it is more likely than not that the asset will not be recoverable, a valuation allowance must be established. To the extent the Company establishes a valuation allowance or changes the allowance in a future period, income tax expense will be impacted.
In evaluating income tax positions, the Company records liabilities for potential exposures. These tax liabilities are adjusted in the period actual developments give rise to such change. Those developments could be, but are not limited to, settlement of tax audits, expiration of the statute of limitations, and changes in the tax code and regulations, along with varying application of tax policy and administration within those jurisdictions. Refer to Note 8, "Income Taxes," for further discussion of income taxes and changes in unrecognized tax benefit.
SALES TAXES The Company presents sales net of sales taxes in its consolidated statements of operations.
REVENUE RECOGNITION The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of merchandise at the time the merchandise is sold and the product is delivered to the customer, net of an allowance for estimated future returns. Service revenues are recognized on completion of the service. Service revenue consists of the labor charged for installing merchandise or maintaining or repairing vehicles, excluding the sale of any installed parts or materials. The Company records revenue net of an allowance for estimated future returns. The Company establishes reserves for sales returns and allowances based on current sales levels and historical return rates. Revenue from gift card sales is recognized on gift card redemption. The Company's gift cards do not have expiration dates. The Company recognizes breakage on gift cards when, among other things, sufficient gift card history is available to estimate potential breakage and the Company determines there are no legal obligations to remit the value of unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions. Estimated gift card breakage revenue is immaterial for all periods presented.
The Company's Customer Loyalty program allows members to earn points for each qualifying purchase. Points earned allow members to receive a certificate that may be redeemed on future purchases within 120 days of issuance. The retail value of points earned by loyalty program members is included in accrued liabilities as deferred income and recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time the points are earned, based on the historic and projected rate of redemption. The Company recognizes deferred revenue and the cost of the free products distributed to loyalty program members
44
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
when the awards are redeemed. The cost of the free products distributed to program members is recorded within costs of revenues.
A portion of the Company's transactions includes the sale of auto parts that contain a core component. These components represent the recyclable portion of the auto part. Customers are not charged for the core component of the new part if a used core is returned at the point of sale of the new part; otherwise the Company charges customers a specified amount for the core component. The Company refunds that same amount if the customer returns a used core to the store at a later date. The Company does not recognize sales or cost of sales for the core component of these transactions when a used part is returned by the customer at the point of sale.
COSTS OF REVENUES Costs of merchandise sales include the cost of products sold, buying, warehousing and store occupancy costs. Costs of service revenue include service center payroll and related employee benefits, service center occupancy costs and cost of providing free or discounted towing services to customers. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs, maintenance, depreciation and amortization expenses.
VENDOR SUPPORT FUNDS The Company receives various incentives in the form of discounts and allowances from its suppliers based on purchases or for services that the Company provides to the suppliers. These incentives received from suppliers include rebates, allowances and promotional funds and are generally based on a percentage of the gross amount purchased. Funds are recorded when title of goods purchased have transferred to the Company as the amount is known and not contingent on future events. The amount of funds to be received are subject to supplier agreements and ongoing negotiations that may be impacted in the future based on changes in market conditions, supplier marketing strategies and changes in the profitability or sell-through of the related merchandise for the Company.
Generally vendor support funds are earned based on purchases or product sales. These incentives are treated as a reduction of inventories and are recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the inventories are sold. Certain supplier allowances are used exclusively for promotions and to offset certain other direct expenses if the Company determines the allowances are for specific, identifiable incremental expenses. Vendor support funds used to offset direct advertising costs were immaterial for fiscal years 2013, 2012, and 2011.
WARRANTY RESERVE The Company provides warranties for both its merchandise sales and service labor. Warranties for merchandise are generally covered by the respective suppliers with the Company covering any costs above the supplier's stipulated allowance. Service labor is warranted in full by the Company for a limited specific time period. The Company establishes its warranty reserves based on historical experience. These costs are included in either costs of merchandise sales or costs of service revenue in the consolidated statement of operations.
45
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
The reserve for warranty activity for the years ended February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively, are as follows:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, January 28, 2012 | $ | 673 | ||
Additions related to sales in the current year | 11,920 | |||
Warranty costs incurred in the current year | (11,729 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Balance, February 2, 2013 | 864 | |||
Additions related to sales in the current year | 13,748 | |||
Warranty costs incurred in the current year | (13,930 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Balance, February 1, 2014 | $ | 682 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
ADVERTISING The Company expenses the costs of advertising the first time the advertising takes place. Gross advertising expense for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $62.8 million, $63.3 million and $54.9 million, respectively, and is recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses. No advertising costs were recorded as assets as of February 1, 2014 or February 2, 2013.
STORE OPENING COSTS The costs of opening new stores are expensed as incurred.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS The Company evaluates the ability to recover long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. In the event assets are impaired, losses are recognized to the extent the carrying value exceeds fair value. In addition, the Company reports assets to be disposed of at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair market value less selling costs. See discussion of current year impairments in Note 11, "Store Closures and Asset Impairments."
EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year plus incremental shares that would have been outstanding upon the assumed exercise of dilutive stock based compensation awards.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS The Company's discontinued operations reflect the operating results for closed stores where the customer base could not be maintained. Loss from discontinued operations relates to expenses for previously closed stores and principally includes costs for rent, taxes, payroll, repairs and maintenance, asset impairments, and gains or losses on disposal.
ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION At February 1, 2014, the Company has two stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described in Note 14, "Equity Compensation Plans." Compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions are recognized in the financial statements. The cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee's requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award).
46
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Other comprehensive income includes changes in the pension liability and fair market value of cash flow hedges.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES The Company may enter into interest rate swap agreements to hedge the exposure to increasing rates with respect to its certain variable rate debt agreements. The Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measures those instruments at fair value. See further discussion in Note 5, "Debt and Financing Arrangements."
SEGMENT INFORMATION The Company has six operating segments defined by geographic regions which are Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, Central, West and Southern CA. Each segment serves both DIY and DIFM lines of business. The Company aggregates all of its operating segments and has one reportable segment. Sales by major product categories are as follows:
| 52 weeks ended | 53 weeks ended | 52 weeks ended | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||||
Parts and accessories | $ | 1,238,384 | $ | 1,252,617 | $ | 1,259,500 | ||||
Tires | 370,313 | 391,331 | 383,257 | |||||||
Service labor | 457,871 | 446,782 | 420,870 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | $ | 2,066,568 | $ | 2,090,730 | $ | 2,063,627 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
SIGNIFICANT SUPPLIERS During fiscal 2013, the Company's ten largest suppliers accounted for approximately 45% of merchandise purchased. Only one supplier accounted for more than 10% of the Company's purchases. Other than a commitment to purchase 6.3 million units of oil products at various prices over a three-year period, the Company has no long-term contracts or minimum purchase commitments under which the Company is required to purchase merchandise. Open purchase orders are based on current inventory or operational needs and are fulfilled by suppliers within short periods of time and generally are not binding agreements.
SELF INSURANCE The Company has risk participation arrangements with respect to workers' compensation, general liability, automobile liability, and other casualty coverages. The Company has a wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary through which it reinsures this retained exposure. This subsidiary uses both risk sharing treaties and third party insurance to manage this exposure. The Company records both liabilities and reinsurance receivables using actuarial methods utilized in the insurance industry based upon historical claims experience. For the duration of fiscal 2013, the Company self insured certain employee-related health care benefit liabilities. The Company maintains stop loss coverage with third party insurers through which it reinsures certain of its casualty and health care benefit liabilities. The Company's stop loss coverage receivables were immaterial as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013. As of February 1, 2014, the Company moved to a premium based health insurance program with third party providers.
RECLASSIFICATION Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported totals for assets, liabilities, shareholders' equity, cash flows or net income.
47
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists" ("ASU 2013-11"). ASU 2013-11 states that an unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, if available at the reporting date under the applicable tax law to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position. If the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, "Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2013-02"), which requires companies to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") by component. In addition, companies are required to report significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI by the respective line items of net income if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, companies are required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail on those amounts. ASU 2013-02 does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements, and is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2—ACQUISITIONS
During the third quarter of 2013, the Company paid $10.7 million to purchase 18 Service & Tire Centers located in Southern California from AKH Company, Inc., which had operated under the name Discount Tire Centers. This acquisition was financed using cash on hand. Collectively, the acquired stores produced approximately $26.1 million in sales annually based on unaudited pre-acquisition historical information. Revenues attributable to the acquired stores are currently immaterial to date. The results of operations of these acquired stores are included in the Company's results of operations as of the date of acquisition.
The Company expensed all costs related to this acquisition during Fiscal 2013. The total costs related to this acquisition were immaterial and are included in the consolidated statement of operations within selling, general and administrative expenses.
48
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 2—ACQUISITIONS (Continued)
The Company has recorded its initial accounting for this acquisition in accordance with accounting guidance on business combinations. The purchase price of the acquisition was preliminarily allocated to tangible assets of approximately $0.8 million and $0.1 million in intangible assets, with the remaining $9.9 million recorded as goodwill. The goodwill was primarily related to growth opportunities and assembled workforces, and is deductible for tax purposes. The Company expects to finalize its purchase price allocation by the end of the 2nd quarter of fiscal 2014. The Company believes that any subsequent adjustments to the purchase price allocation will not be material.
As the acquisition was immaterial to the Company's operating results for year ended February 1, 2014, pro forma results of operations are not disclosed.
During fiscal 2011, the Company made three separate acquisitions. The Company acquired the assets related to seven service and tire centers located in the Seattle-Tacoma area, the assets related to seven service and tire centers located in the Houston, Texas area and all outstanding shares of capital stock of Tire Stores Group Holding Corporation which operated an 85-store chain in Florida, Georgia and Alabama under the name Big 10. Collectively, the acquired stores produced approximately $94.7 million (unaudited) in sales annually based on pre-acquisition historical information. The total purchase price of these stores was approximately $42.6 million in cash and the assumption of certain liabilities. The acquisitions were financed through cash flows provided by operations. The results of operations of these acquired stores are included in the Company's results from their respective acquisition dates.
The Company has recorded its accounting for these acquisitions in accordance with accounting guidance on business combinations. The acquisitions resulted in goodwill related to, among other things, growth opportunities and assembled workforces. A portion of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The Company has recorded finite-lived intangible assets at their estimated fair value related to trade names, favorable and unfavorable leases.
The Company expensed all costs related to these acquisitions during fiscal 2011. The total costs related to these acquisitions were $1.5 million and are included in the consolidated statement of operations within selling, general and administrative expenses.
49
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 2—ACQUISITIONS (Continued)
The purchase price of the acquisitions has been allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, with the remainder recorded as goodwill on the basis of estimated fair values. The allocation is as follows:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | As of Acquisition Dates | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Current assets | $ | 11,421 | ||
Intangible assets | 950 | |||
Other non-current assets | 9,149 | |||
Current liabilities | (13,817 | ) | ||
Long-term liabilities | (9,458 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Total net identifiable assets acquired | $ | (1,755 | ) | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Total consideration transferred, net of cash acquired | $ | 42,614 | ||
Less: total net identifiable assets acquired | (1,755 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Goodwill | $ | 44,369 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
Intangible assets consist of trade names ($0.6 million) and favorable leases ($0.3 million). Long-term liabilities include unfavorable leases ($9.1 million). The trade names are being amortized over their estimated useful life of 3 years. The favorable and unfavorable lease intangible assets and liabilities are being amortized to rent expense over their respective lease terms, ranging from 2 to 16 years. Amortization expense for the favorable and unfavorable leases over the next four years is approximately $0.6 million per year. Deferred tax assets in the amount of $6.8 million are primarily recorded in other non-current liabilities.
Sales for the fiscal 2011 acquired stores totaled $63.9 million from acquisition date through January 28, 2012. The net loss for the acquired stores for the period from acquisition date through January 28, 2012 was $2.0 million, excluding transition related expenses.
As the acquisitions (including Big 10) were immaterial to the operating results both individually and in aggregate for the fifty-two week periods ended January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011, pro forma results for the fifty-two week period ended January 28, 2012 are not presented.
In 2011, the Company recorded a reduction to the contingent consideration of $0.7 million related to one of the Company's acquisitions. The reversal of contingent consideration was recorded to selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
50
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 3—OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
The following are the components of other current assets:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reinsurance receivable | $ | 61,182 | $ | 59,160 | |||
Income taxes receivable | 1,643 | 668 | |||||
Other | 580 | 610 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 63,405 | $ | 60,438 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
NOTE 4—ACCRUED EXPENSES
The following are the components of accrued expenses:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Casualty and medical risk insurance | $ | 153,830 | $ | 152,606 | |||
Accrued compensation and related taxes | 30,645 | 27,641 | |||||
Sales tax payable | 12,245 | 11,556 | |||||
Other | 40,683 | 40,474 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 237,403 | $ | 232,277 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
NOTE 5—DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
The following are the components of debt and financing arrangements:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Senior Secured Term Loan, due October 2018 | $ | 198,000 | $ | 200,000 | |||
Revolving Credit Agreement, through July 2016 | 3,500 | — | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | 201,500 | 200,000 | |||||
Current maturities | (2,000 | ) | (2,000 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Long-term debt less current maturities | $ | 199,500 | $ | 198,000 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Senior Secured Term Loan due October 2018
On October 11, 2012, the Company entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other parties thereto that (i) increased the size of the Company's Senior Secured Term Loan (the "Term Loan") to $200.0 million, (ii) extended the maturity of the Term Loan from October 27, 2013 to October 11, 2018, (iii) reset the interest rate under the Term Loan to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), subject to a floor of 1.25%, plus 3.75% and (iv) added an additional 16 of the Company's owned locations to the collateral pool securing the Term Loan. The amended and restated Term Loan was deemed to be substantially different than the prior Term Loan, and therefore the
51
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 5—DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)
modification of the debt was treated as a debt extinguishment. The Company recorded $6.5 million of deferred financing costs related to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.
Net proceeds from the fiscal 2012 amendment and restatement of the Term Loan together with cash on hand were used to settle the Company's outstanding interest rate swap on the Term Loan as structured prior to its amendment and restatement and to satisfy and discharge all of the Company's outstanding 7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes ("Notes") due 2014. The settlement of the interest rate swap resulted in the reclassification of $7.5 million of accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense. The Company recognized, in interest expense, $1.9 million of deferred financing costs related to the Notes and the Term Loan as structured prior to its amendment and restatement. The interest payment and the swap settlement payment are presented within cash flows from operations on the consolidated statement of cash flows.
On October 11, 2012, the Company entered into two new interest rate swaps for a notional amount of $50.0 million each that together were designated as a cash flow hedge on the first $100.0 million of the Term Loan. The interest rate swaps convert the variable LIBOR portion of the interest payments due on the first $100.0 million of the Term Loan to a fixed rate of 1.855%.
On November 12, 2013, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The First Amendment reduced the interest rate payable by the Company from (i) LIBOR, subject to a 1.25% floor, plus 3.75% to (ii) LIBOR, subject to a 1.25% floor, plus 3.00%. The Company recorded $0.8 million of deferred financing costs related to the First Amendment.
As of February 1, 2014, 142 stores collateralized the Term Loan. The amount outstanding under the Term Loan as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013 was $198.0 million and $200.0 million, respectively.
Revolving Credit Agreement Through July 2016
The Company has a Revolving Credit Agreement among the Company, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other parties thereto providing for borrowings of up to $300.0 million and having a maturity of July 2016. The interest rate on this facility is LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% to 2.50% for LIBOR rate borrowings or Prime plus 1.00% to 1.50% for Prime rate borrowings. The margin is based upon the then current availability under the facility. As of February 1, 2014, the Company had $3.5 million outstanding under the facility and $44.8 million of availability was utilized to support outstanding letters of credit. Taking into account the borrowing base requirements (including reduction for amounts outstanding under the supplier financing program), as of February 1, 2014 there was $161.4 million of availability remaining under the facility.
Other Matters
The Company's debt agreements require compliance with covenants. The most restrictive of these covenants, an earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") requirement, is triggered if the Company's availability under its Revolving Credit Agreement plus unrestricted cash drops below $50.0 million. As of February 1, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all financial
52
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 5—DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)
covenants contained in its debt agreements. The weighted average interest rate on all debt borrowings during fiscal 2013 and 2012 was 4.9% and 5.1%, respectively.
The Company has a supplier financing program with availability up to $200.0 million which is funded by various bank participants who have the ability, but not the obligation, to purchase account receivables owed by the Company directly from suppliers. The Company, in turn, makes the regularly scheduled full supplier payments to the bank participants. The outstanding balance under the program was $129.8 million and $149.7 million under the program as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively.
The Company has letter of credit arrangements in connection with its risk management and import merchandising programs. The Company had $13.9 million and $5.2 million outstanding commercial letters of credit as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively. The Company was contingently liable for $30.9 million and $32.2 million in outstanding standby letters of credit as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively.
The Company is also contingently liable for surety bonds in the amount of approximately $10.6 million and $11.5 million as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively. The surety bonds guarantee certain payments (for example utilities, easement repairs, licensing requirements and customs fees).
The annual maturities of long-term debt, for the next five fiscal years are:
(dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Year | Long-Term Debt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | $ | 2,000 | ||
2015 | 2,000 | |||
2016 | 5,500 | |||
2017 | 2,000 | |||
2018 | 190,000 | |||
Thereafter | — | |||
| | | | |
Total | $ | 201,500 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
Interest rates that are currently available to the Company for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value for debt obligations and are considered a level 2 measure under the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value of long-term debt including current maturities was $203.7 million and $203.5 million as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively.
53
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 6—LEASE AND OTHER COMMITMENTS
In fiscal 2013, in connection with the acquisitions discussed in Note 2, the Company assumed additional lease obligations totaling $17.4 million over an average of 10 years. The aggregate minimum rental payments for all leases having initial terms of more than one year are as follows:
(dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Year | Operating Leases | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | $ | 111,025 | ||
2015 | 103,824 | |||
2016 | 95,989 | |||
2017 | 88,129 | |||
2018 | 77,120 | |||
Thereafter | 294,535 | |||
| | | | |
Aggregate minimum lease payments | $ | 770,622 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
Rental expense incurred for operating leases in fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $102.3 million, $97.9 million and $91.6 million, respectively, and are recorded primarily in cost of revenues. The deferred gain for all sale leaseback transactions is being recognized as a reduction of costs of merchandise sales and costs of service revenues over the minimum term of these leases.
NOTE 7—ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The Company records asset retirement obligations as incurred and when reasonably estimable, including obligations for which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the Company. The obligation principally represents the removal of leasehold improvements from stores upon termination of store leases. The obligations are recorded as liabilities at fair value using discounted cash flows and are accreted over the lease term. Costs associated with the obligations are capitalized and amortized over the estimated remaining useful life of the asset.
The Company has recorded a liability pertaining to the asset retirement obligation in other long-term liabilities on its consolidated balance sheet. Changes in assumptions reflect favorable
54
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 7—ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS (Continued)
experience with the rate of occurrence of obligations and expected settlement dates. The liability for asset retirement obligations activity from January 28, 2012 through February 1, 2014 is as follows:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Asset retirement obligation at January 28, 2012 | $ | 5,875 | ||
Additions | 89 | |||
Change in assumptions | (288 | ) | ||
Settlements | (11 | ) | ||
Accretion expense | 298 | |||
| | | | |
Asset retirement obligation at February 2, 2013 | 5,963 | |||
Additions | 245 | |||
Change in assumptions | (287 | ) | ||
Settlements | (12 | ) | ||
Accretion expense | 334 | |||
| | | | |
Asset retirement obligation at February 1, 2014 | $ | 6,243 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
NOTE 8—INCOME TAXES
The components of income from continuing operations before income taxes are as follows:
| Year Ended | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||||
Domestic | $ | 8,533 | $ | 14,577 | $ | 36,634 | ||||
Foreign | 757 | 7,923 | 4,954 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 9,290 | $ | 22,500 | $ | 41,588 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
55
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 8—INCOME TAXES (Continued)
The provision for income taxes includes the following:
| Year Ended | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||||
Current: | ||||||||||
Federal | $ | (267 | ) | $ | (338 | ) | $ | — | ||
State | 451 | 471 | 602 | |||||||
Foreign | 2,132 | 1,636 | 1,557 | |||||||
Deferred: | ||||||||||
Federal(a) | 2,765 | 6,548 | 14,743 | |||||||
State | 840 | 988 | (3,887 | ) | ||||||
Foreign | (3,684 | ) | 40 | (555 | ) | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total income tax expense from continuing operations(a) | $ | 2,237 | $ | 9,345 | $ | 12,460 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
- (a)
- Excludes tax benefit recorded to discontinued operations of $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective rate for income tax expense follows:
| Year Ended | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||||
Statutory tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||
State income taxes, net of federal tax | 6.0 | 4.1 | 3.2 | |||||||
Foreign taxes, net of federal tax | 4.4 | 5.6 | 1.7 | |||||||
Tax credits, net of valuation allowance | (7.5 | ) | (3.2 | ) | (2.3 | ) | ||||
Foreign deferred adjustment | (8.4 | ) | — | — | ||||||
Foreign tax law change impact | (3.8 | ) | — | — | ||||||
Tax uncertainty adjustment | (3.0 | ) | (1.5 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||
Release of valuation allowance | — | — | (8.3 | ) | ||||||
Non deductible expenses | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | |||||||
Stock compensation | — | 1.8 | 0.1 | |||||||
Other, net | (2.1 | ) | (0.8 | ) | — | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
24.1 | % | 41.5 | % | 30.0 | % |
56
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 8—INCOME TAXES (Continued)
Items that gave rise to the deferred tax accounts are as follows:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||
Employee compensation | $ | 3,544 | $ | 5,274 | |||
Store closing reserves | 673 | 719 | |||||
Legal reserve | 182 | 122 | |||||
Benefit accruals | 2,109 | 1,247 | |||||
Net operating loss carryforwards—Federal | 1,115 | 1,887 | |||||
Net operating loss carryforwards—State | 111,258 | 111,785 | |||||
Tax credit carryforwards | 26,605 | 16,291 | |||||
Accrued leases | 15,215 | 16,032 | |||||
Interest rate derivatives | — | 708 | |||||
Deferred gain on sale leaseback | 46,176 | 51,124 | |||||
Deferred revenue | 2,987 | 5,194 | |||||
Other | 1,312 | 1,874 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Gross deferred tax assets | 211,176 | 212,257 | |||||
Valuation allowance | (106,695 | ) | (102,341 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
104,481 | 109,916 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||
Depreciation | $ | 33,059 | $ | 42,400 | |||
Inventories | 71,630 | 65,203 | |||||
Real estate tax | 3,300 | 3,214 | |||||
Insurance and other | 4,299 | 6,261 | |||||
Interest rate derivatives | 274 | — | |||||
Debt related liabilities | 3,606 | 3,588 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
116,168 | 120,666 | ||||||
| | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax (liability) asset | $ | (11,687 | ) | $ | (10,750 | ) | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
As of February 1, 2014, the Company had available tax net operating losses that can be carried forward to future years. The Company has $1.1 million of deferred tax assets related to federal net operating loss carryforwards which begin to expire in 2027. The Company has $2.4 million of deferred tax assets related to state tax net operating loss carryforwards in unitary filing jurisdictions, of which 1.6% will expire in the next five years and a full valuation allowance has been recorded against. The balance of $108.9 million of the Company's net operating loss carryforwards are for separate company state filing jurisdictions that will expire in various years beginning in 2014. Separate company state net operating losses of $107.1 million are in the jurisdictions where the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets.
The tax credit carryforward as of February 1, 2014 consists of $7.9 million of alternative minimum tax credits, $7.0 million of hiring credits and $11.7 million of various state and foreign credits. The alternative minimum tax credits have an indefinite life, while the other credits are scheduled to expire
57
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 8—INCOME TAXES (Continued)
in various years starting from 2014, of which $6.7 million have valuation allowances recorded against them.
The temporary differences between the book and tax treatment of income and expenses result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within the consolidated balance sheet. The Company must assess the likelihood that any recorded deferred tax assets will be recovered against future taxable income. To the extent the Company believes it is more likely than not that the asset will not be recoverable, a valuation allowance must be established. To the extent the Company establishes a valuation allowance or changes the allowance in a future period, income tax expense will be impacted. In fiscal year 2013, the Company recorded a benefit for gross state hiring credits of approximately $6.3 million that were impacted by a state tax law change enacted during the fiscal year that restricted the carryforward period for these credits. The Company recorded $6.7 million of gross valuation allowances on these credits and other state credit carryforwards. There was no significant change in the Company's valuation allowance position in fiscal year 2012.
The Company and its subsidiaries' largest jurisdictions subject to income tax are U.S. federal, Puerto Rico (foreign) and various states jurisdictions, in respective order of significance. The Company's U.S. federal returns for tax years 2011 and forward are subject to examination. Foreign, state and local income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of three to five years after filing of the respective returns.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrecognized tax benefit balance at the beginning of the year | $ | 2,274 | $ | 3,364 | $ | 4,131 | ||||
Gross increases for tax positions taken in prior years | — | — | — | |||||||
Gross decreases for tax positions taken in prior years | — | (338 | ) | — | ||||||
Gross increases for tax positions taken in current year | 13 | 201 | 235 | |||||||
Settlements taken in current year | — | — | — | |||||||
Lapse of statute of limitations | (346 | ) | (953 | ) | (1,002 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Unrecognized tax benefit balance at the end of the year | $ | 1,941 | $ | 2,274 | $ | 3,364 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense and, accordingly, the Company recognized $0.1 million in fiscal years 2013 and 2012 related to potential interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions. As of February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, the Company has recorded $0.5 million, $0.5 million, and $0.3 million, respectively, for the payment of interest and penalties which are excluded from the unrecognized tax benefit noted above.
58
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 8—INCOME TAXES (Continued)
Unrecognized tax benefits include $0.7 million, $0.9 million, and $1.3 million, as of February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, that if recognized would affect the Company's annual effective tax rate. The Company does not anticipate material changes to its unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.
NOTE 9—STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
On December 12, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $50.0 million of the Company's common stock to be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, with no expiration date. The Company repurchased 237,624 shares of Common Stock for $2.8 million in fiscal 2013 and 35,000 shares of Common Stock for $0.3 million in fiscal 2012. All of these repurchased shares were placed into the Company's treasury.
NOTE 10—ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended February 1, 2014:
| Gains on Cash Flow Hedges | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | |||
Beginning balance | $ | (980 | ) | |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications, net of $584 tax | 975 | |||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of $230 tax(a) | 384 | |||
| | | | |
Net current-period other comprehensive income | 1,359 | |||
Ending balance | $ | 379 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
- (a)
- Reclassified amount increased interest expense.
NOTE 11—STORE CLOSURES AND ASSET IMPAIRMENTS
During fiscal 2013, the Company recorded a $7.7 million impairment charge related to 47 stores, four of which were classified as held for disposal and 43 of which were classified as held and used as of February 1, 2014. Of the $7.7 million impairment charge, $2.4 million was charged to merchandise cost of sales, and $5.3 million was charged to service cost of sales. In fiscal 2012, the Company recorded a $10.6 million impairment charge related to 49 stores classified as held and used. Of the $10.6 million impairment charge, $5.1 million was charged to merchandise cost of sales, and $5.5 million was charged to service cost of sales. In both years the Company used a probability-weighted approach and estimates of expected future cash flows to determine the fair value of these stores. Discount and growth rate assumptions were derived from current economic conditions, management's expectations and projected trends of current operating results. The fair market value estimates are classified as a Level 2 or Level 3 measure within the fair value hierarchy. The remaining fair value of the impaired assets was $4.2 million and $2.3 million at February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively.
59
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 11—STORE CLOSURES AND ASSET IMPAIRMENTS (Continued)
A store is classified as held for disposal when (i) the Company has committed to a plan to sell, (ii) the building is vacant and the property is available for sale, (iii) the Company is actively marketing the property for sale, (iv) the sale price is reasonable in relation to its current fair value and (v) the Company expects to complete the sale within one year. Assets held for disposal have been valued at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value, net of disposal costs. The fair value of these assets is estimated using readily available market data for comparable properties and is classified as a Level 2 (as described in Note 16, "Fair Value Measurements") measure within the fair value hierarchy. No depreciation expense is recognized during the period the asset is held for disposal. During fiscal 2013, the Company had four stores classified as assets held for disposal, which are as follows:
| Year Ended | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 1, 2014 | |||
Land | $ | 1,348 | ||
Building and improvements | 3,946 | |||
Accumulated depreciation | (3,281 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Property and equipment—net | $ | 2,013 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
Number of properties | 4 |
The Company classifies the four properties as held for disposal as the Company continues to actively market the properties at prices the Company believes reasonable given current market conditions and expects to sell these properties within the next twelve months. In addition, during fiscal 2013, the Company recorded $0.9 million of impairment charges related to four stores classified as held for disposal of which $0.7 million was charged to merchandise cost of sales and $0.2 was charged to service cost of sales. There were no stores classified as held for disposal in fiscal 2012.
60
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 11—STORE CLOSURES AND ASSET IMPAIRMENTS (Continued)
The following schedule details activity in the reserve for closed locations for the three years in the period ended February 1, 2014. The reserve balance includes remaining rent on leases net of sublease income.
(dollar amounts in thousands) | | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, January 29, 2011 | $ | 1,241 | ||
Accretion of present value of liabilities | 53 | |||
Change in assumptions about future sublease income, lease termination | 310 | |||
Cash payments | 674 | |||
| | | | |
Balance, January 28, 2012 | (477 | ) | ||
Accretion of present value of liabilities | 1,801 | |||
Provision for closed locations | 137 | |||
Change in assumptions about future sublease income, lease termination | 367 | |||
Cash payments | (664 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Balance, February 2, 2013 | 1,641 | |||
Accretion of present value of liabilities | 36 | |||
Change in assumptions about future sublease income, lease termination | 322 | |||
Cash payments | (1,449 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Balance, February 1, 2014 | $ | 550 | ||
| | | | |
61
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 12—EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following schedule presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for earnings from continuing operations:
| | Year Ended | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) | February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | ||||||||
(a) | Earnings from continuing operations before discontinued operations | $ | 7,053 | $ | 13,155 | $ | 29,128 | |||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit of $102, $186 and $121 | (188 | ) | (345 | ) | (225 | ) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings | $ | 6,865 | $ | 12,810 | $ | 28,903 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(b) | Basic average number of common shares outstanding during period | 53,378 | 53,225 | 52,958 | ||||||||
Common shares assumed issued upon exercise of dilutive stock options, net of assumed repurchase, at the average market price | 585 | 729 | 673 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(c) | Diluted average number of common shares assumed outstanding during period | 53,963 | 53,954 | 53,631 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations (a/b) | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax | — | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.54 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations (a/c) | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.54 | ||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax | — | — | — | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.54 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Certain stock options were excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings per share because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period then ended and therefore would be anti-dilutive. The total number of such shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation was 937,000; 859,000; and 870,000 as of February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013, and January 28, 2012, respectively.
NOTE 13—BENEFIT PLANS
DEFINED BENEFIT AND CONTRIBUTION PLANS
The Company continues to maintain the non-qualified defined contribution portion of the SERP plan (the "Account Plan") for key employees designated by the Board of Directors. On January 31, 2014, the Account Plan was amended to eliminate the retirement plan contributions that have historically been made by the Company effective for calendar year 2015. The Company's contribution
62
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 13—BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
expense for the Account Plan was $0.8 million, $0.1 million and $0.3 million for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company has a qualified 401(k) savings plan and a separate savings plan for employees residing in Puerto Rico, which cover all full-time employees who are at least 21 years of age with one or more years of service. The Company contributes the lesser of 50% of the first 6% of a participant's contributions or 3% of the participant's compensation under both savings plans. For fiscal 2012 and 2011, the Company's contributions were conditional upon the achievement of certain pre-established financial performance goals which were not met in fiscal 2012 or 2011. Employer contributions for fiscal 2013 were not conditional. The Company's savings plans' contribution expense was $3.5 million in fiscal 2013.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company terminated its defined benefit pension plan and contributed $14.1 million to fully fund the plan on a termination basis. Accordingly, the Company has no further defined benefit pension expense. The participants' benefits were converted into a lump sum cash payment or an annuity contract placed with an insurance carrier. The Company used a fiscal year end measurement date for determining the benefit obligation and the fair value of Plan assets. The actuarial computations were made using the "projected unit credit method." Variances between actual experience and assumptions for costs and returns on assets were amortized over the remaining service lives of employees under the Plan.
Pension expense is as follows:
| Year Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||
Service cost | $ | — | $ | — | |||
Interest cost | 2,170 | 2,558 | |||||
Expected return on plan assets | (2,658 | ) | (2,745 | ) | |||
Amortization of prior service cost | 13 | 14 | |||||
Recognized actuarial loss | 1,896 | 1,499 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Net Period Pension Cost | 1,421 | 1,326 | |||||
Settlement Charge | 17,753 | — | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Net Period Pension Cost | $ | 19,174 | $ | 1,326 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
63
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 13—BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
The following actuarial assumptions were used to determine benefit obligation and pension expense:
| Year Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||
Benefit obligation assumptions: | |||||||
Discount rate | N/A | 4.60 | % | ||||
Rate of compensation increase | N/A | N/A | |||||
Pension expense assumptions: | |||||||
Discount rate | 4.60 | % | 5.70 | % | |||
Expected return on plan assets | 6.80 | % | 6.80 | % | |||
Rate of compensation expense | N/A | N/A |
The Company selected the discount rate for the benefit obligation at February 2, 2013 to reflect a rate commensurate with a model bond portfolio with durations that match the expected payment patterns of the plans. To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption, the Company considered the historical returns and the future expectations for returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio. This resulted in the selection of a long-term rate of return on assets of 6.80% for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011.
64
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 13—BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and funded status of the Company's defined benefit plans:
| Year ended | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(dollar amounts in thousands) | February 2, 2013 | |||
Change in benefit obligation: | ||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year | $ | 53,974 | ||
Interest cost | 2,170 | |||
Actuarial loss | 3,621 | |||
Settlements paid | (58,134 | ) | ||
Benefits paid | (1,631 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Benefit obligation at end of year | $ | — | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
Change in plan assets: | ||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | $ | 43,602 | ||
Actual return on plan assets (net of expenses) | 2,050 | |||
Employer contributions | 14,113 | |||
Settlements paid | (58,134 | ) | ||
Benefits paid | (1,631 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ | — | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
Unfunded status at fiscal year end | $ | — | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
Net amounts recognized on consolidated balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||
Noncurrent benefit liability (included in other long-term liabilities) | $ | — | ||
| | | | |
Net amount recognized at fiscal year end | $ | — | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (pre-tax) at fiscal year end | ||||
Actuarial loss | $ | — | ||
Prior service cost | — | |||
| | | | |
Net amount recognized at fiscal year end | $ | — | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to change in pension liability recognition | $ | (15,433 | ) | |
Accumulated benefit obligation at fiscal year end | $ | — | ||
Other information | ||||
Employer contributions expected in fiscal 2013 | $ | — | ||
Estimated actuarial loss and prior service cost amortization in fiscal 2013 | $ | — |
Plan Assets and Investment Policy
Investment policies were established in accordance with the Company's Benefits Committee (the "Committee") responsibilities to the participants of the Plan and its beneficiaries, and in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"). The objective of
65
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 13—BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
the Plan was to meet current and future benefit payment needs within the constraints of diversification and prudent risk taking. The Plan was diversified across asset classes to achieve an optimal balance between risk and return and between income and growth of assets through capital appreciation. Investment objectives for each asset class were determined based on specific risks and investment opportunities identified. The Company believes that the diversification of its assets minimizes the risk due to concentration of the Plan assets.
The Company updated its long-term, strategic asset allocations annually using various analytics to determine the optimal asset mix and consideration of plan liability characteristics, liquidity characteristics, funding requirements, expected rates of return and the distribution of returns. Actual allocations to each asset class vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes, market value fluctuations, the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocation positions (such as private equity and real estate), and the timing of benefit payments and contributions. Short term investments and exchange-traded derivatives were used to rebalance the actual asset allocation to the target asset allocation. The asset allocation was monitored and rebalanced on a monthly basis.
The manager of the investments provided advice and recommendations to help the Committee discharge its fiduciary responsibilities in furtherance of the Plan's goals and objectives. The manager had the discretion to allocate assets among funds within each asset class to conform to strategic targets and ranges established by the Committee. The target asset allocation was 50% equity securities and 50% fixed income. The investment policy requires that the asset allocation be maintained within certain ranges. The weighted average asset allocations and asset allocation ranges by asset category were as follows:
Weighted Average Asset Allocations
| January 28, 2012 | Asset Allocation Ranges | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total equities | 50 | % | 45 - 55 | % | |||
Domestic equities | 32 | % | 28 - 38 | % | |||
Non-US equities | 18 | % | 12 - 22 | % | |||
Fixed income | 50 | % | 45 - 55 | % |
Generally, investments are valued based on information in financial publications of general circulation, statistical and valuation services, records of security exchanges, appraisal by qualified persons, transactions and bona fide offers. Money market funds are valued using a market approach based on the quoted market prices of identical instruments. These investments are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Domestic equities, non-US equities, and both long duration fixed income securities consist of collective trust ("CT") funds. CT funds are comprised of shares or units in commingled funds that are not publicly traded. The underlying assets in these funds (equity securities and fixed income securities) are publicly traded on exchanges and price quotes for the assets held by these funds are readily available. CT funds are valued at their net asset values that are calculated by the investment manager of the fund and have daily or monthly liquidity. These investments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
66
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 13—BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Guaranteed annuity contracts ("GACs") are annuity insurance contracts. GACs are primarily invested in public bonds with some small placement in common stock, private placement bonds and commercial mortgage products. The GACs are valued based on unobservable inputs, as observable inputs are not available, using valuation methodologies to determine fair value. GACs are deemed to be Level 3 investments.
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of Level 3 financial assets during fiscal 2012:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | Fair Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, January 28, 2012 | $ | 1,334 | ||
Transfers from other investments | — | |||
Interest income and gains | 116 | |||
Administrative fees | (72 | ) | ||
Benefits paid during the period | (1,378 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Balance, February 2, 2013 | $ | — | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that allows its officers and certain other employees to defer up to 20% of their annual salary and 100% of their annual bonus. The first 20% of an officer's bonus deferred into the Company's stock was matched by the Company on a one-for-one basis with Company stock that vests and is expensed over three years. The shares required to satisfy distributions of voluntary bonus deferrals and the accompanying match in the Company's stock are issued from its treasury account. On January 31, 2014, the Company amended the deferred compensation plan to eliminate the automatic matching employer contributions effective for fiscal 2014.
RABBI TRUST
The Company establishes and maintains a deferred liability for the non-qualified deferred compensation plan and the Account Plan. The Company plans to fund this liability by remitting the officers' deferrals to a Rabbi Trust where these are invested in variable life insurance policies. These assets are included in non-current other assets and are considered to be a Level 2 measure within the fair value hierarchy. Accordingly, all gains and losses on these underlying investments, which are held in the Rabbi Trust to fund the deferred liability, are recognized in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations. Under these plans, there were liabilities of $6.9 million at February 1, 2014 and $6.7 million at February 2, 2013, respectively, which are recorded primarily in other long-term liabilities.
67
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 14—EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan (the "2009 Plan") under which it has previously granted, and may continue to grant, non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock units ("RSUs"), and Performance Share Units ("PSUs") to key employees and members of its Board of Directors. As of February 1, 2014, there were 2,738,100 awards outstanding and 770,361 awards available for grant under the 2009 Plan.
Incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options granted to non-officers vest fully on the third anniversary of their grant date and to officers vest in equal tranches over three or four year periods. Generally, all options granted prior to March 3, 2004 carry an expiration date of ten years and options granted on or after March 3, 2004 carry an expiration date of seven years. RSUs previously granted to non-officers vest fully on the third anniversary of their grant date. RSUs previously granted to officers vest in equal tranches over three or four year periods. PSUs granted to officers vest on the third anniversary of their grant date if, and only if, certain predetermined performance targets are achieved.
The Company has also granted RSUs under the 2009 plan in conjunction with its non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Under the deferred compensation plan, the first 20% of an officer's bonus deferred into the Company's stock fund was matched by the Company on a one-for-one basis with RSUs that vest over a three-year period, with one third vesting on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. On January 31, 2014, the Company amended and restated the deferred compensation plan to eliminate the automatic matching employer contributions effective for fiscal 2014.
The terms and conditions applicable to future grants under the 2009 plan are generally determined by the Board of Directors, provided that the exercise price of stock options must be at least 100% of the quoted market price of the common stock on the grant date. The Company currently satisfies all share requirements resulting from RSU and PSU conversions and option exercises from its treasury stock. The Company believes its treasury share balance at February 1, 2014 is adequate to satisfy such activity during the next twelve-month period.
The following table summarizes the options under the plans:
| Fiscal Year 2013 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||
Outstanding—beginning of year | 1,678,593 | $ | 8.20 | ||||
Granted | 308,963 | 11.86 | |||||
Exercised | (188,652 | ) | 7.16 | ||||
Forfeited | (84,514 | ) | 11.02 | ||||
Expired | (55,919 | ) | 13.48 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Outstanding—end of year | 1,658,471 | 8.67 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Vested and expected to vest options—end of year | 1,630,736 | 8.62 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Options exercisable—end of year | 1,158,960 | 7.53 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
68
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 14—EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about options during the last three fiscal years (dollars in thousands except per option):
| Fiscal 2013 | Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2011 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weighted average fair value at grant date per option | $ | 5.11 | $ | 4.65 | $ | 5.38 | ||||
Intrinsic value of options exercised | $ | 1,059 | $ | 874 | $ | 202 |
The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options, exercisable options and expected to vest options at February 1, 2014 was $5.8 million, $5.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively. At February 1, 2014, the weighted average remaining contractual term of outstanding options, exercisable options and expected to vest options was 4.1 years, 3.0 years and 6.6 years, respectively. At February 1, 2014, there was approximately $1.7 million of total unrecognized pre-tax compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years.
The following table summarizes information about non-vested PSUs and RSUs since February 2, 2013:
| Number of PSUs | Number of RSUs | Total | Weighted Average Fair Value | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonvested at February 2, 2013 | 651,305 | 145,295 | 796,600 | $ | 9.67 | ||||||||
Granted | 259,986 | 77,607 | 337,593 | 12.23 | |||||||||
Forfeited | (235,778 | ) | (7,442 | ) | (243,220 | ) | 9.30 | ||||||
Vested | — | (65,515 | ) | (65,515 | ) | 11.57 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nonvested at February 1, 2014 | 675,513 | 149,945 | 825,458 | 10.68 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes information about RSUs during the last three fiscal years:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | Fiscal 2013 | Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2011 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weighted average fair value at grant date per unit | $ | 12.23 | $ | 9.48 | $ | 10.45 | ||||
Fair value at vesting date | $ | 758 | $ | 768 | $ | 1,498 | ||||
Intrinsic value at conversion date | $ | 525 | $ | 218 | $ | 896 | ||||
Tax benefits realized from conversions | $ | 197 | $ | 82 | $ | 336 |
At February 1, 2014, there was approximately $2.7 million of total unrecognized pre-tax compensation cost related to non-vested PSUs and RSUs in the aggregate, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.
The Company recognized approximately $1.2 million, $1.1 million, and $1.3 million of compensation expense related to stock options, and approximately $1.8 million, $0.2 million, and $1.9 million of compensation expense related to PSUs and RSUs in the aggregate, included in selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The related tax benefit recognized was approximately $1.1 million, $0.4 million and $1.2 million for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
69
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 14—EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)
Expected volatility is based on historical volatilities for a time period similar to that of the expected term and the expected term of the options is based on actual experience. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve for issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following are the weighted-average assumptions:
| Year ended | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 1, 2014 | February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||
Dividend yield | 0% | 0% | 1.0% | |||
Expected volatility | 53% | 58% | 58% | |||
Risk-free interest rate range: | ||||||
High | 0.7% | 0.6% | 1.9% | |||
Low | 0.7% | 0.5% | 1.6% | |||
Ranges of expected lives in years | 4 - 5 | 4 - 5 | 4 - 5 |
The Company granted approximately 109,000 and 106,000 PSUs in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively that will vest if the employees remain continuously employed through the third anniversary date of the grant and the Company achieves a return on invested capital target for fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively. The number of underlying shares that may be issued upon vesting will range from 0% to 150%, depending upon the Company achieving the financial targets in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively. At the date of the grants, the fair values were $11.85 per unit and $9.98 per unit for the 2013 and 2012 awards, respectively. The Company also granted approximately 55,000 and 53,000 PSUs for fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively, that will vest if the employees remain continuously employed through the third anniversary date of the grant and will become exercisable if the Company satisfies a total shareholder return target in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. The number of underlying shares that may become exercisable will range from 0% to 175% depending on whether the market condition is achieved. The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate a $13.41 per unit and $7.96 per unit grant date fair value for the 2013 and 2012 PSUs, respectively. The non-vested restricted stock award table reflects the maximum vesting of underlying shares for performance and market based awards granted in both 2013 and 2012.
During fiscal 2013, the Company granted approximately 4,000 restricted stock units for officers' deferred bonus matches under the Company's non-qualified deferred compensation plan, which vest over a three-year period. The fair value of these awards was $11.25 per unit and the compensation expense recorded for these awards was immaterial. The Company did not grant any restricted stock units for officers' deferred bonus matches under the Company's non-qualified deferred compensation plan during fiscal 2012.
During fiscal 2013, the Company granted approximately 54,000 restricted stock units to its non-employee directors of the board, which vest over a one-year period with a quarter vesting on each of the first four quarters following their grant date. The fair value for these awards was $12.05 per unit. During fiscal 2012, the Company granted approximately 33,000 restricted stock units to its non-employee directors of the board, which vest over a one-year period with a quarter vesting on each of the first four quarters following their grant date. The fair value was $9.98 per unit.
70
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 14—EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)
The Company reflects in its consolidated statement of cash flows any tax benefits realized upon the exercise of stock options or issuance of RSUs in excess of that which is associated with the expense recognized for financial reporting purposes. The amounts reflected as financing cash inflows and operating cash outflows in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 are immaterial.
During fiscal 2011, the Company began an employee stock purchase plan which provides eligible employees the opportunity to purchase shares of the Company's stock at a stated discount through regular payroll deductions. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued or transferred under the plan is 2,000,000 shares. All shares purchased by employees under this plan will be issued through treasury stock. The Company's expense for the discount during fiscal years 2013 and 2012 was immaterial. As of February 1, 2014, there were 1,875,753 shares available for issuance under this plan.
NOTE 15—INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENT
In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company settled its interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge on $145.0 million of the Company's Term Loan prior to its amendment and restatement. The swap was used to minimize interest rate exposure and overall interest costs by converting the variable component of the total interest rate to a fixed rate of 5.036%. Since February 1, 2008, this swap was deemed to be fully effective and all adjustments in the interest rate swap's fair value were recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss. The settlement of this swap resulted in an interest charge of $7.5 million, which was previously recorded within accumulated other comprehensive loss. Immediately subsequent to the previous interest rate swap's settlement, on October 11, 2012, the Company entered into two new interest rate swaps for a notional amount of $50.0 million each that together are designated as a cash flow hedge on the first $100.0 million of the amended and restated Term Loan. The interest rate swaps convert the variable LIBOR portion of the interest payments due on the first $100.0 million of the Term Loan to a fixed rate of 1.855%. As of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, the fair value of the new swap was a net $0.6 million asset and a net $1.6 million payable, respectively, recorded within other long-term assets or other long-term liabilities on the balance sheet.
The Company's refinancing of the $200.0 million Term Loan on November 12, 2013, which lowered the interest rate payable by the Company from LIBOR, subject to a 1.25% floor plus 3.75%, to LIBOR, subject to a 1.25% floor plus 3.00%, had no impact on the Company's interest rate swap or hedge accounting.
NOTE 16—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company's fair value measurements consist of (a) non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the Company's financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) and (b) all financial assets and liabilities.
Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. There is a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable
71
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 16—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company's assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:
The Company's long-term investments and interest rate swap agreements are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The information in the following paragraphs and tables primarily addresses matters relative to these assets and liabilities.
Cash equivalents:
Cash equivalents, other than credit card receivables, include highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at acquisition. The Company carries these investments at fair value. As a result, the Company has determined that its cash equivalents in their entirety are classified as a Level 1 measure within the fair value hierarchy.
Collateral investments:
Collateral investments include monies on deposit that are restricted. The Company carries these investments at fair value. As a result, the Company has determined that its collateral investments are classified as a Level 1 measure within the fair value hierarchy.
Deferred compensation assets:
Deferred compensation assets include variable life insurance policies held in a Rabbi Trust. The Company values these policies using observable market data. The inputs used to value the variable life insurance policy fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative liability:
The Company has two interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges on $100.0 million of the Company's Senior Secured Term Loan facility that expires in October 2018. The Company values this swap using observable market data to discount projected cash flows and for credit risk adjustments. The inputs used to value derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
72
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 16—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides information by level for assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, on a recurring basis.
| | Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair Value at February 1, 2014 | ||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) Description | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 33,431 | $ | 33,431 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Collateral investments(a) | 21,611 | 21,611 | — | — | |||||||||
Deferred compensation assets(a) | 4,242 | — | 4,242 | — | |||||||||
Other assets | |||||||||||||
Derivative asset(a) | 606 | — | 606 | — |
- (a)
- included in other long-term assets
| | Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair Value at February 2, 2013 | ||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) Description | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 59,186 | $ | 59,186 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Collateral investments(a) | 20,929 | 20,929 | — | — | |||||||||
Deferred compensation assets(a) | 3,834 | — | 3,834 | — | |||||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||
Other liabilities | |||||||||||||
Derivative liability(b) | 1,567 | — | 1,567 | — |
- (a)
- included in other long-term assets
- (b)
- included in other long-term liabilities
The following represents the impact of fair value accounting for the Company's derivative liability on its consolidated financial statements:
(dollar amounts in thousands) | Amount of Gain in Other Comprehensive Income (Effective Portion) | Earnings Statement Classification | Amount of Loss Recognized in Earnings (Effective Portion) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal 2013 | $ | 1,359 | Interest expense | $ | 614 | ||||
Fiscal 2012 | 2,171 | Interest expense | 4,676 |
Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, that is, the assets are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances such as when there is evidence of impairment. These measures of fair value, and related inputs, are considered level 2 or level 3 measures under the fair
73
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 16—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
value hierarchy. Measurements of assets held and used are discussed in Note 11, "Store Closures and Asset Impairments."
NOTE 17—LEGAL MATTERS
The Company is party to a consent decree, effective July 15, 2010, with the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") that, among other things, required the Company to implement a formal compliance program with respect to certain small gasoline engine merchandise sold by the Company. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the EPA alleged, in writing, that the Company had violated certain inspection, testing and reporting requirements of the Consent Decree and made an aggregated stipulated penalty demand of $2.3 million as a result thereof. The Company is currently engaged in settlement negotiations with the EPA with respect thereto. The Company has accrued an amount that it believes is sufficient to resolve those violations for which it believes it is liable. If the Company is unable to resolve all of the violations with the EPA through its settlement negotiations, the Company intends to invoke formal dispute resolution procedures with the EPA under the terms of the Consent Decree.
The Company is also party to various actions and claims arising in the normal course of business. The Company believes that amounts accrued for awards or assessments in connection with all such matters are adequate and that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position. However, there exists a possibility of loss in excess of the amounts accrued, the amount of which cannot currently be estimated. While the Company does not believe that the amount of such excess loss will be material to the Company's financial position, any such loss could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations in the period(s) during which the underlying matters are resolved.
NOTE 18—QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | (Loss) / Earnings Per Share from Continuing Operations | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | (Loss) / Earnings from Continuing Operations | | (Loss) / Earnings Per Share | Market Price Per Share | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Revenues | Gross Profit | Operating (Loss) / Profit | (Loss) / Earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | Diluted | Basic | Diluted | High | Low | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended February 1, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4th quarter | $ | 495,733 | $ | 104,016 | $ | (6,614 | ) | $ | (3,267 | ) | $ | (3,331 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 13.86 | $ | 11.36 | |||||
3rd quarter | 507,042 | 122,812 | 7,641 | 1,013 | 964 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 13.05 | 11.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2nd quarter | 527,619 | 138,708 | 17,748 | 5,379 | 5,368 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 12.94 | 11.14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1st quarter | 536,173 | 121,840 | 3,521 | 3,928 | 3,863 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 12.14 | 10.29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended February 2, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4th quarter | $ | 530,847 | $ | 117,206 | $ | (16,394 | ) | $ | (14,320 | ) | $ | (14,543 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 11.16 | $ | 9.48 | |||||
3rd quarter | 509,608 | 116,040 | 3,791 | (6,695 | ) | (6,759 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.13 | ) | 10.57 | 8.76 | |||||||||||||||||
2nd quarter | 525,671 | 130,601 | 16,315 | 33,034 | 33,048 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 14.93 | 8.67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1st quarter | 524,604 | 127,652 | 7,940 | 1,134 | 1,062 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 15.46 | 14.90 |
The sum of individual share amounts may not equal due to rounding.
74
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
NOTE 18—QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company recorded on a pre-tax basis, a $17.8 million pension settlement charge. In the third quarter of fiscal 2012 the Company recorded, on a pre-tax basis, an asset impairment charge of $8.8 million and refinancing costs of $11.2 million. In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company recorded, on a pre-tax basis, merger settlement proceeds, net of costs of $42.8 million. There were no cash dividends paid in Fiscal 2013 or Fiscal 2012.
75
ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures Our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective in providing reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes to the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended February 1, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company's financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
76
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014 based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management determined that the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014 was effective.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report, which is included on page 78 herein, on the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014.
77
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of February 1, 2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014 of the Company and our report dated April 17, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 17, 2014
78
None.
ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The material contained in the Company's definitive proxy statement, which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company's 2013 fiscal year (the "Proxy Statement"), under the captions "—Nominees for Election", "—Corporate Governance" and "SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE" is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The information regarding executive officers called for by Item 401 of Regulation S-K is included in Part I of this Form 10-K, in accordance with General Instruction G (3).
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all of its associates including its executive officers. The Code of Ethics, together with any amendments thereto or waivers thereof, are posted on the Company's website www.pepboys.com under the "Investor Relations—Corporate Governance" section.
In addition, the Board of Directors Code of Conduct and the charters of our audit, human resources and nominating and governance committees may also be found under the "Investor Relations—Corporate Governance" section of our website. As required by the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), promptly following our 2013 Annual Meeting, our Chief Executive Officer certified to the NYSE that he was not aware of any violation by Pep Boys of NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Copies of our corporate governance materials are available free of charge from our investor relations department. Please call 215-430-9105 or write Pep Boys, Investor Relations, 3111 West Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19132.
ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The material contained in the Proxy Statement under the captions "—How are Directors Compensated?", "—Director Compensation Table" and "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION" other than the material under "—Compensation Committee Report" is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The material contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption "SHARE OWNERSHIP" is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The information regarding equity compensation plans called for by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is included in Item 5 of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The material contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption "—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "—Corporate Governance" is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The material contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption "—Registered Public Accounting Firm's Fees" is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
79
ITEM 15 EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
- (a)
- The following documents are filed as part of this report:
| | Page | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | The following consolidated financial statements of The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack are included in Item 8 | |||||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 36 | |||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets—February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013 | 37 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income—Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013, and January 28, 2012 | 38 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity—Years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013, and January 28, 2012 | 39 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013, and January 28, 2012 | 40 | |||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 41 | |||||
2. | The following consolidated financial statement schedule of The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack is included | |||||
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves | 85 | |||||
All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. |
- 3.
- Exhibits
(3.1 | ) | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation | Incorporated by reference from the Company's 10-K dated February 14, 2009. | ||
(3.2 | ) | By-Laws amended and restated | Incorporated by reference from the Company's 8-K dated February 17, 2010. | ||
(10.1) | (1) | Form of Change of Control between the Company and certain officers of the Company. | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 8-K dated August 6, 2012 | ||
(10.2) | (1) | Form of Non-Competition Agreement between the Company and certain officers of the Company. | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011. | ||
(10.3) | (1) | The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, Amended and Restated as of August 3, 2012 | Incorporated by reference from the Company's 8-K dated August 6, 2012. | ||
(10.4) | (1) | Amendment to The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack 2009 Stock Incentive Plan | Incorporated by reference from the Company's 8-K dated June 12, 2013. | ||
(10.5) | (1) | Long-Term Disability Salary Continuation Plan amended and restated as of March 26, 2002. | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003. | ||
(10.6) | (1) | Amendment and restatement as of January 1, 2010 of The Pep Boys Savings Plan. | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011. |
80
(10.7) | (1) | Amendment 2013-1 to The Pep Boys Savings Plan | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 2, 2013. | ||
(10.8) | (1) | Amendment and restatement as of January 1, 2011 of The Pep Boys Savings Plan—Puerto Rico. | Filed herewith | ||
(10.9) | (1) | The Pep Boys Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated | Filed herewith. | ||
(10.10) | (1) | The Pep Boys Annual Incentive Bonus Plan, as amended and restated | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009. | ||
(10.11) | (1) | Account Plan, as amended and restated | Filed herewith. | ||
(10.12) | (1) | The Pep Boys Grantor Trust Agreement | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007. | ||
(10.13 | ) | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 26, 2011, by and among the Company, as Lead Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other parties thereto. | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 8-K dated July 28, 2011. | ||
(10.14 | ) | First Amendment dated October 11, 2012 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 26, 2011, among the Company, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other parties thereto. | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 8-K dated October 11, 2012. | ||
(10.15 | ) | Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated October 11, 2012, among the Company, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and the other parties thereto. | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 8-K dated October 11, 2012. | ||
(10.16 | ) | First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 12, 2013, among the Company, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and the other parties thereto. | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 2, 2013. | ||
(21 | ) | Subsidiaries of the Company | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011. | ||
(23 | ) | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | Filed herewith | ||
81
(31.1 | ) | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith | ||
(31.2 | ) | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith | ||
(32.1 | ) | Principal Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith | ||
(32.2 | ) | Principal Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith | ||
(101.INS | ) | XBRL Instance Document | Filed herewith | ||
(101.SCH | ) | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | Filed herewith | ||
(101.CAL | ) | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | Filed herewith | ||
(101.LAB | ) | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document | Filed herewith | ||
(101.PRE | ) | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | Filed herewith | ||
(101.DEF | ) | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | Filed herewith |
- (1)
- Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
82
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: April 17, 2014 | THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK (REGISTRANT) | |||
By: | /s/ DAVID R. STERN David R. Stern Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Capacity | Date | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ MICHAEL R. ODELL Michael R. Odell | President and Chief Executive Officer; Director (Principal Executive Officer) | April 17, 2014 | ||
/s/ DAVID R. STERN David R. Stern | Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | April 17, 2014 | ||
/s/ SANJAY SOOD Sanjay Sood | Vice President—Chief Accounting Officer & Controller | April 17, 2014 | ||
/s/ ROBERT H. HOTZ Robert H. Hotz | Chairman of the Board | April 17, 2014 | ||
/s/ M. SHÂN ATKINS M. Shân Atkins | Director | April 17, 2014 | ||
/s/ JAMES MITAROTONDA James Mitarotonda | Director | April 17, 2014 | ||
/s/ ROBERT ROSENBLATT Robert Rosenblatt | Director | April 17, 2014 |
83
Signature | Capacity | Date | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ JANE SCACCETTI Jane Scaccetti | Director | April 17, 2014 | ||
/s/ JOHN T. SWEETWOOD John T. Sweetwood | Director | April 17, 2014 | ||
/s/ ANDREA M. WEISS Andrea M. Weiss | Director | April 17, 2014 | ||
/s/ NICK WHITE Nick White | Director | April 17, 2014 |
84
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
THE REQUIREMENTS OF FORM 10-K
THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
(dollar amounts in thousands)
Column A | Column B | Column C | Column D | Column E | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description | Balance at Beginning of Period | Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses | Additions Charged to Other Accounts | Deductions(1) | Balance at End of Period | |||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended February 1, 2014 | $ | 1,302 | $ | 2,563 | $ | — | $ | 2,546 | $ | 1,320 | ||||||
Year ended February 2, 2013 | $ | 1,303 | $ | 2,479 | $ | — | $ | 2,480 | $ | 1,302 | ||||||
Year ended January 28, 2012 | $ | 1,551 | $ | 2,434 | $ | — | $ | 2,682 | $ | 1,303 |
- (1)
- Uncollectible accounts written off.
Column A | Column B | Column C | Column D | Column E | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description | Balance at Beginning of Period | Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses | Additions Charged to Other Accounts(2) | Deductions(2) | Balance at End of Period | |||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
SALES RETURNS AND ALLOWANCES: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended February 1, 2014 | $ | 896 | $ | — | $ | 62,596 | $ | 62,686 | $ | 806 | ||||||
Year ended February 2, 2013 | $ | 773 | $ | — | $ | 63,068 | $ | 62,945 | $ | 896 | ||||||
Year ended January 28, 2012 | $ | 1,056 | $ | — | $ | 61,425 | $ | 61,708 | $ | 773 |
- (2)
- Sales return and allowance activity is recorded through a reduction of merchandise sales and costs of merchandise sales.
85