Exhibit (17)(c)(ii)

IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY, DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS, PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
|
| None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
|
|
| Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
|
|
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of Februar y 28, 2010 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS | | | | |
| |
Investment Update | 2 |
|
Performance Information and Portfolio Composition | |
Alabama | 3 |
Arkansas | 5 |
Georgia | 7 |
Kentucky | 9 |
Louisiana | 11 |
Maryland | 13 |
Missouri | 15 |
North Carolina | 17 |
Oregon | 19 |
South Carolina | 21 |
Tennessee | 23 |
Virginia | 25 |
|
|
Fund Expenses | 27 |
|
Financial Statements | 34 |
|
Board of Trustees’ Annual Approval | |
of the Investment Advisory Agreements | 145 |
|
Officers and Trustees | 149 |
1
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of Februar y 28, 2010
INVESTMENT UPDATE
Economic and Market Conditions
During the six months ending February 28, 2010, the U.S. economy and the capital markets remained relatively stable, despite continued high unemployment and concerns over the U.S. budget. After contracting in the first two quarters of 2009—declining at annualized rates of 6.4% and 0.7%, respectively—the U.S. economy grew at annualized rates of 2.2% and 5.7% in the third and fourth quarters, respectively, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce.
During the six-month period, the municipal bond market continued to post solid positive performance, driven by demand from investors seeking tax-free income. The Funds’ primary benchmark, the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (the Index)—a broad-based, unmanaged index of municipal bonds—gained 4.13% for the period.1 The appetite for municipal bonds continued to be buoyed by provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 aimed at supporting the municipal market. The new Build America Bond program gave municipal issuers broader access to the taxable debt markets, providing the potential for lower net borrowing costs and reducing the supply of traditional tax-exempt bonds. The federal stimulus program also provided direct cash subsidies to municipalities that were facing record budget deficits. The result of these events was a rally in the latter half of 2009 for the sector as yields fell and prices rose across the yield curve. In the first two months of 2010, the market has been relatively unchanged.
Management Discussion
During the six months ending February 28, 2010, the Funds’ Class A shares at net asset value outperformed the Index and the average return of their respective Lipper peer groups.1 Given the significant price movement at the longer end of the municipal yield curve, management’s bias toward longer maturities was the basis for much of the Funds’ outperformance during the period. Investing across the credit spectrum and making higher allocations to revenue bonds also contributed positively to relative performance.
The Funds generally invest in bonds with stated maturities of 10 years or longer, as longer-maturity bonds historically have provided greater tax-exempt income for investors than shorter-maturity bonds. Longer-maturity bonds outperformed shorter maturities during the first 4 months of the period, thus providing the basis for much of the Funds’ outperformance of the Index.
Management employed leverage in some of the Funds, through which additional exposure to the municipal market was achieved. Leverage has the impact of magnifying a Fund’s exposure to its underlying investments in both up and down markets.2 As we move ahead, we recognize that many state and local governments face significant budget deficits that are driven primarily by a steep decline in tax revenues. We will continue to monitor any new developments as state and local officials formulate solutions to address these fiscal problems. As in all environments, we maintain our long-term perspective on the markets against the backdrop of relatively short periods of market volatility. We will continue to actively manage the Funds with the same income-focused, relative value approach we have always employed. We believe that this approach, which is based on credit research and decades of exper ience in the municipal market, will serve municipal investors well over the long term.
As of February 19, 2010, Thomas M. Metzold became the portfolio manager of Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipal Income Fund. Mr. Metzold is a Vice President and Co-Director of Municipal Investments of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). He has been a portfolio manager of Eaton Vance municipal income funds since 1991.
Effective December 1, 2009, each Fund changed its name from Eaton Vance [State] Municipals Fund to Eaton Vance [State] Municipal Income Fund.
1 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total returns are the average total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Funds.
2 Certain Funds employ residual interest bond (RIB) financing. The leverage created by RIB investments provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value).
See Note 1I to the financial statements for more information on RIB investments.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Funds’ current or future investments and may change due to active management.
2
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: William H. Ahern, Jr., CFA
| | | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | ETALX | EVALX | ECALX | EIALX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | |
Six Months | 5.60% | 5.12% | 5.21% | 5.70% |
One Year | 14.28 | 13.43 | 13.53 | 14.61 |
Five Years | 4.00 | 3.21 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 5.42 | 4.64 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.60 | 4.66 | 3.14 | 8.06 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 0.62% | 0.12% | 4.21% | 5.70% |
One Year | 8.83 | 8.43 | 12.53 | 14.61 |
Five Years | 2.99 | 2.86 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.90 | 4.64 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.28 | 4.66 | 3.14 | 8.06 |
†Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 5/1/92; Class C: 3/21/06; Class I: 3/3/08
| | | | |
Total Annual | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 1.60% | 1.60% | 0.65% |
| | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.15% 3.45% | 3.45% | 4.33% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 6.72 | 5.59 | 5.59 | 7.01 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 3.27 | 2.69 | 2.71 | 3.63 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 5.30 | 4.36 | 4.39 | 5.88 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year | |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | | 4.62% | | |
One Year | 9.98 | | 13.15 | | |
Five Years | 4.50 | | 4.50 | | |
10 Years | 5.83 | | 6.50 | | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | |
Six Months | | | 4.18% | |
One Year | | | 10.97 | | |
Five Years | | | 3.35 | | |
10 Years | | | 4.81 | | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered at net asset value. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.05% relating to the Fund’s liabili ty with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund's distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.25% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 127, 125, 111 and 103 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
3
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
* | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows: |
| | | |
AAA | 25.7% | BB | 1.0% |
AA | 20.4% | CCC | 1.6% |
A | 31.6% | Not Rated | 11.7% |
BBB | 8.0% | | |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
• Number of Issues: | 60 |
• Average Maturity: | 20.4 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 11.6 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 6.8 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $101.09 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 2.2% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.
4
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
| | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | ETARX | EVARX | ECARX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | |
Six Months | 5.39% | 5.00% | 5.00% |
One Year | 15.07 | 14.21 | 14.21 |
Five Years | 2.98 | 2.20 | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.81 | 4.05 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.38 | 4.26 | 1.91 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 0.41% | 0.00% | 4.00% |
One Year | 9.66 | 9.21 | 13.21 |
Five Years | 1.99 | 1.85 | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.30 | 4.05 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.06 | 4.26 | 1.91 |
† Inception dates: Class A: 2/9/94; Class B: 10/2/92; Class C: 4/28/06 | |
|
Total Annual | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | 0.83% | 1.58% | 1.58% |
| | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.08% | 3.37% | 3.37% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 6.75 | 5.57 | 5.57 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 3.52 | 2.94 | 2.94 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 5.82 | 4.86 | 4.86 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | Barclays Capital 20 Year |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | 4.62% | |
One Year | 9.98 | 13.15 | |
Five Years | 4.50 | 4.50 | |
10 Years | 5.83 | 6.50 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | |
Six Months | | 4.18% | |
One Year | | 10.97 | |
Five Years | | 3.35 | |
10 Years | | 4.81 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.05% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 39.55% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by divi ding the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 127, 125, 111 and 103 funds for the 6-mont h, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
5
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments

* | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows: |
| | | |
AAA | 12.5% | BB | 0.6% |
AA | 27.4% | CCC | 1.2% |
A | 47.2% | Not Rated | 5.6% |
BBB | 5.5% | | |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
|
• Number of Issues: | 92 |
• Average Maturity: | 20.5 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 11.6 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 7.9 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $96.29 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 0.8% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.
6
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
| | | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | ETGAX | EVGAX | ECGAX | EIGAX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | |
Six Months | 5.46% | 5.11% | 5.11% | 5.67% |
One Year | 15.04 | 14.17 | 14.16 | 15.36 |
Five Years | 2.99 | 2.23 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 5.13 | 4.36 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.16 | 4.18 | 2.16 | 7.50 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 0.49% | 0.11% | 4.11% | 5.67% |
One Year | 9.55 | 9.17 | 13.16 | 15.36 |
Five Years | 2.00 | 1.89 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.62 | 4.36 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 3.85 | 4.18 | 2.16 | 7.50 |
†Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 12/23/91; Class C: 4/25/06; Class I: 3/3/08
| | | | |
Total Annual | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 1.75% | 1.75% | 0.80% |
| | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.40% 3.70% | 3.71% | 4.58% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 7.20 | 6.06 | 6.07 | 7.50 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 4.01 | 3.46 | 3.45 | 4.41 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 6.56 | 5.66 | 5.65 | 7.22 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year | |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | | 4.62% | | |
One Year | 9.98 | | 13.15 | | |
Five Years | 4.50 | | 4.50 | | |
10 Years | 5.83 | | 6.50 | | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | | |
Lipper Georgia Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
Six Months | | | 4.37% | |
One Year | | | 11.27 | | |
Five Years | | | 3.27 | | |
10 Years | | | 4.92 | | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered at net asset value. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.18% relating to the Fund’s liabili ty with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.90% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Georgia Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 18, 18, 15 and 14 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
7
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
* | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows: |
| | | |
AAA | 25.2% | BB | 0.9% |
AA | 41.0% | CCC | 1.1% |
A | 24.8% | Not Rated | 0.9% |
BBB | 6.1% | | |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
|
• Number of Issues: | 82 |
• Average Maturity: | 22.4 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 13.2 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 9.5 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $101.82 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 8.4% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.
8
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
| | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | ETKYX | EVKYX | ECKYX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | |
Six Months | 6.41% | 6.06% | 5.94% |
One Year | 13.90 | 13.11 | 13.11 |
Five Years | 3.31 | 2.53 | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.50 | 3.75 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.11 | 4.15 | 2.44 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 1.35% | 1.06% | 4.94% |
One Year | 8.50 | 8.11 | 12.11 |
Five Years | 2.32 | 2.19 | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.00 | 3.75 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 3.80 | 4.15 | 2.44 |
† Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 12/23/91; Class C: 3/23/06 | |
|
Total Annual | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B Class C |
Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
| | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.27% | 3.56% | 3.56% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 6.99 | 5.83 | 5.83 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 3.69 | 3.13 | 3.13 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 6.04 | 5.12 | 5.12 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | Barclays Capital 20 Year | |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | 4.62% | | |
One Year | 9.98 | 13.15 | | |
Five Years | 4.50 | 4.50 | | |
10 Years | 5.83 | 6.50 | | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | |
Six Months | | 4.18% | |
One Year | | 10.97 | |
Five Years | | 3.35 | |
10 Years | | 4.81 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.90% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unlever-aged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 127, 125, 111 and 103 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
9
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution1
By total investments
| |
Fund Statistics | |
|
• Number of Issues: | 56 |
• Average Maturity: | 18.6 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 10.3 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 6.7 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $93.89 |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the
total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when
making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and
does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can
change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the
actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The
rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assess-
ment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment
in the security.
10
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
| | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | ETLAX | EVLAX | ELACX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | |
Six Months | 6.03% | 5.57% | 5.67% |
One Year | 17.88 | 17.07 | 17.17 |
Five Years | 3.27 | 2.49 | N.A. |
10 Years | 5.44 | 4.66 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.57 | 4.42 | 2.34 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 0.95% | 0.57% | 4.67% |
One Year | 12.31 | 12.07 | 16.17 |
Five Years | 2.27 | 2.15 | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.92 | 4.66 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.25 | 4.42 | 2.34 |
† Inception dates: Class A: 2/14/94; Class B: 10/2/92; Class C: 12/4/07 | |
|
Total Annual | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 1.55% | 1.54% |
| | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.51% | 3.83% | 3.82% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 7.38 | 6.27 | 6.25 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 4.29 | 3.74 | 3.75 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 7.02 | 6.12 | 6.14 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | Barclays Capital 20 Year |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | 4.62% | |
One Year | 9.98 | 13.15 | |
Five Years | 4.50 | 4.50 | |
10 Years | 5.83 | 6.50 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | |
Six Months | | 4.18% | |
One Year | | 10.97 | |
Five Years | | 3.35 | |
10 Years | | 4.81 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.04% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.90% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by divi ding the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 127, 125, 111 and 103 funds for the 6-mont h, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
11
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments

* | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows: |
| | | |
AAA | 30.9% | BBB | 24.7% |
AA | 16.3% | Not Rated | 8.3% |
A | 19.8% | | |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
• Number of Issues: | 53 |
• Average Maturity: | 24.1 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 17.1 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 7.4 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $95.59 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 0.8% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.
12
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Craig R. Brandon, CFA
| | | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | ETMDX | EVMYX | ECMDX | EIMDX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | |
Six Months | 5.95% | 5.60% | 5.60% | 6.15% |
One Year | 17.45 | 16.63 | 16.63 | 17.92 |
Five Years | 3.39 | 2.62 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.98 | 4.20 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.22 | 4.28 | 2.52 | 7.56 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 0.94% | 0.60% | 4.60% | 6.15% |
One Year | 11.86 | 11.63 | 15.63 | 17.92 |
Five Years | 2.38 | 2.28 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.47 | 4.20 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 3.90 | 4.28 | 2.52 | 7.56 |
†Inception dates: Class A: 12/10/93; Class B: 2/3/92; Class C: 5/2/06; Class I: 3/3/08
| | | | |
Total Annual | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | 0.92% | 1.68% | 1.67% | 0.71% |
| | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.34% | 3.65% | 3.65% | 4.51% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 7.12 | 5.99 | 5.99 | 7.40 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 3.57 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.95 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 5.86 | 4.92 | 4.92 | 6.48 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year | |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | | 4.62% | | |
One Year | 9.98 | | 13.15 | | |
Five Years | 4.50 | | 4.50 | | |
10 Years | 5.83 | | 6.50 | | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | | |
Lipper Maryland Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | |
Six Months | | | 5.27% | |
One Year | | | 14.07 | | |
Five Years | | | 3.37 | | |
10 Years | | | 4.88 | | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered at net asset value. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.10% relating to the Fund’s liabili ty with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 39.06% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Maryland Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 35, 34, 25 and 19 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
13
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
* | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows: |
| | | |
AAA | 25.9% | BBB | 8.4% |
AA | 22.6% | BB | 1.0% |
A | 31.9% | Not Rated | 10.2% |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
• Number of Issues: | 78 |
• Average Maturity: | 21.7 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 13.3 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 7.5 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $101.33 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 2.2% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.
14
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Cynthia J. Clemson
| | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | ETMOX | EVMOX | ECMOX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | |
Six Months | 5.19% | 4.71% | 4.72% |
One Year | 13.06 | 12.27 | 12.17 |
Five Years | 2.85 | 2.07 | N.A. |
10 Years | 5.11 | 4.32 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.52 | 4.64 | 1.67 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 0.22% | -0.29% | 3.72% |
One Year | 7.69 | 7.27 | 11.17 |
Five Years | 1.87 | 1.73 | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.59 | 4.32 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.21 | 4.64 | 1.67 |
† Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 5/1/92; Class C: 2/16/06 | |
|
Total Annual | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | 0.84% | 1.59% | 1.59% |
| | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 3.85% | 3.14% | 3.14% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 6.30 | 5.14 | 5.14 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 3.48 | 2.91 | 2.91 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 5.70 | 4.76 | 4.76 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | Barclays Capital 20 Year |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | 4.62% | |
One Year | 9.98 | 13.15 | |
Five Years | 4.50 | 4.50 | |
10 Years | 5.83 | 6.50 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
Lipper Missouri Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | |
Six Months | | 5.17% | |
One Year | | 12.68 | |
Five Years | | 3.31 | |
10 Years | | 4.98 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.04% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.90% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by divi ding the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Missouri Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 15, 14, 12 and 11 funds for the 6-month, 1-yea r, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
15
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
* | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows: |
| | | |
AAA | 26.3% | BBB | 9.5% |
AA | 36.3% | B | 1.1% |
A | 21.1% | Not Rated | 5.7% |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
• Number of Issues: | 92 |
• Average Maturity: | 18.8 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 12.8 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 8.4 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $97.03 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 1.8% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.
16
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
| | | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | ETNCX | EVNCX | ECNCX | EINCX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | |
Six Months | 5.26% | 4.92% | 4.92% | 5.47% |
One Year | 16.12 | 15.35 | 15.34 | 16.43 |
Five Years | 3.82 | 3.07 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.96 | 4.20 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.30 | 4.33 | 3.40 | 8.32 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 0.26% | -0.08% | 3.92% | 5.47% |
One Year | 10.58 | 10.35 | 14.34 | 16.43 |
Five Years | 2.81 | 2.73 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.46 | 4.20 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 3.98 | 4.33 | 3.40 | 8.32 |
†Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 10/23/91; Class C: 5/2/06; Class I: 3/3/08
| | | | |
Total Annual | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 1.68% | 1.68% | 0.74% |
| | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.48% | 3.80% | 3.80% | 4.65% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 7.47 | 6.34 | 6.34 | 7.76 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 4.11 | 3.57 | 3.56 | 4.52 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 6.85 | 5.95 | 5.94 | 7.54 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year | |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | | 4.62% | | |
One Year | 9.98 | | 13.15 | | |
Five Years | 4.50 | | 4.50 | | |
10 Years | 5.83 | | 6.50 | | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | | |
Lipper North Carolina Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | |
Six Months | | | 4.74% | |
One Year | | | 13.48 | | |
Five Years | | | 3.31 | | |
10 Years | | | 4.77 | | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered at net asset value. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.11% relating to the Fund’s liabili ty with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 40.04% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper North Carolina Municipal Debt Funds Classification con tained 25, 24, 18 and 16 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
17
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
* | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows: |
| | | |
AAA | 31.5% | BBB | 3.1% |
AA | 44.4% | Not Rated | 2.6% |
A | 18.4% | | |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
• Number of Issues: | 87 |
• Average Maturity: | 22.3 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 12.7 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 9.6 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $97.63 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 10.5% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes reflect the effect of RIBs purchased in secondary market transactions.
18
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
| | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | ETORX | EVORX | ECORX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | |
Six Months | 5.07% | 4.67% | 4.67% |
One Year | 16.50 | 15.62 | 15.60 |
Five Years | 3.10 | 2.34 | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.76 | 3.98 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.19 | 4.31 | 1.83 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 0.13% | -0.33% | 3.67% |
One Year | 10.99 | 10.62 | 14.60 |
Five Years | 2.11 | 2.00 | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.25 | 3.98 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 3.88 | 4.31 | 1.83 |
† Inception dates: Class A: 12/28/93; Class B: 12/24/91; Class C: 3/2/06 | |
|
Total Annual | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | 0.94% | 1.68% | 1.69% |
| | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.35% | 3.65% | 3.64% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 7.52 | 6.31 | 6.29 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 4.37 | 3.85 | 3.85 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 7.55 | 6.66 | 6.66 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | Barclays Capital 20 Year |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | 4.62% | |
One Year | 9.98 | 13.15 | |
Five Years | 4.50 | 4.50 | |
10 Years | 5.83 | 6.50 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | |
Six Months | | 4.18% | |
One Year | | 10.97 | |
Five Years | | 3.35 | |
10 Years | | 4.81 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.12% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 42.15% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by divi ding the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 127, 125, 111 and 103 funds for the 6-mont h, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
19
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
* | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows: |
| | | |
AAA | 10.9% | B | 0.4% |
AA | 54.9% | CCC | 0.9% |
A | 16.1% | Not Rated | 6.5% |
BBB | 10.3% | | |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
• Number of Issues: | 98 |
• Average Maturity: | 22.7 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 16.1 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 12.0 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $84.64 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 4.3% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.
20
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
| | | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | EASCX | EVSCX | ECSCX | EISCX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | |
Six Months | 4.93% | 4.52% | 4.51% | 5.03% |
One Year | 15.55 | 14.68 | 14.68 | 15.76 |
Five Years | 2.78 | 2.00 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 5.19 | 4.41 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.38 | 4.23 | 1.72 | 8.02 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | -0.02% | -0.48% | 3.51% | 5.03% |
One Year | 10.07 | 9.68 | 13.68 | 15.76 |
Five Years | 1.77 | 1.66 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.69 | 4.41 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.06 | 4.23 | 1.72 | 8.02 |
†Inception dates: Class A: 2/14/94; Class B: 10/2/92; Class C: 1/12/06; Class I: 3/3/08
| | | | |
Total Annual | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 1.66% | 1.65% | 0.70% |
| | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.12% 3.42% | 3.42% | 4.32% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 6.82 | 5.66 | 5.66 | 7.15 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 4.19 | 3.65 | 3.65 | 4.60 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 6.93 | 6.04 | 6.04 | 7.61 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year | |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | | 4.62% | | |
One Year | 9.98 | | 13.15 | | |
Five Years | 4.50 | | 4.50 | | |
10 Years | 5.83 | | 6.50 | | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | |
Six Months | | | 4.18% | |
One Year | | | 10.97 | | |
Five Years | | | 3.35 | | |
10 Years | | | 4.81 | | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered at net asset value. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.10% relating to the Fund’s liabili ty with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 39.55% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification conta ined 127, 125, 111 and 103 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
21
| | | | |
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010 |
P O R T F O L I O C O M P O S I T I O N | | | | |
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
*The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows:
| | | |
AAA | 23.9% | BBB | 17.1% |
AA | 16.4% | CCC | 0.2% |
A | 42.4% | | |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
|
• Number of Issues: | 81 |
• Average Maturity: | 22.1 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 15.2 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 9.8 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $95.77 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 5.0% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes reflect the effect of RIBs purchased in secondary market transactions.
22
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
| | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | ETTNX | EVTNX | ECTNX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | |
Six Months | 5.37% | 4.94% | 4.94% |
One Year | 14.93 | 14.05 | 14.06 |
Five Years | 2.41 | 1.65 | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.54 | 3.78 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.20 | 4.22 | 1.48 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 0.39% | -0.06% | 3.94% |
One Year | 9.42 | 9.05 | 13.06 |
Five Years | 1.43 | 1.30 | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.04 | 3.78 | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 3.89 | 4.22 | 1.48 |
† Inception dates: Class A: 12/9/93; Class B: 8/25/92; Class C: 5/2/06 | |
|
Total Annual | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | 0.82% | 1.57% | 1.57% |
| | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.11% | 3.39% | 3.40% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 6.73 | 5.55 | 5.56 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 3.17 | 2.58 | 2.58 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 5.19 | 4.22 | 4.22 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | Barclays Capital 20 Year |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | 4.62% | |
One Year | 9.98 | 13.15 | |
Five Years | 4.50 | 4.50 | |
10 Years | 5.83 | 6.50 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | |
Six Months | | 4.18% | |
One Year | | 10.97 | |
Five Years | | 3.35 | |
10 Years | | 4.81 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.03% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.90% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by divi ding the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 127, 125, 111 and 103 funds for the 6-mont h, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
23
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010 |
P O R T F O L I O C O M P O S I T I O N | | | | |
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
* | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows: |
| | | |
AAA | 25.1% | BBB | 10.5% |
AA | 39.5% | Not Rated | 8.1% |
A | 16.8% | | |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
• Number of Issues: | 77 |
• Average Maturity: | 19.6 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 12.2 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 8.1 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $97.73 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 0.5% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.
24
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
| | | | |
Performance1 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | ETVAX | EVVAX | ECVAX | EVAIX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | |
Six Months | 5.67% | 5.30% | 5.30% | 5.88% |
One Year | 18.54 | 17.58 | 17.58 | 18.72 |
Five Years | 2.24 | 1.47 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.50 | 3.74 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 4.05 | 4.27 | 1.13 | 6.55 |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | |
Six Months | 0.62% | 0.30% | 4.30% | 5.88% |
One Year | 12.92 | 12.58 | 16.58 | 18.72 |
Five Years | 1.25 | 1.13 | N.A. | N.A. |
10 Years | 4.00 | 3.74 | N.A. | N.A. |
Life of Fund† | 3.74 | 4.27 | 1.13 | 6.55 |
†Inception dates: Class A: 12/17/93; Class B: 7/26/91; Class C: 2/8/06; Class I: 3/3/08
| | | | |
Total Annual | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 0.76% |
| | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | 4.23% | 3.54% | 3.55% | 4.41% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | 6.90 | 5.78 | 5.79 | 7.20 |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | 4.08 | 3.53 | 3.53 | 4.48 |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | 6.66 | 5.76 | 5.76 | 7.31 |
|
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | |
| Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year | |
| Municipal Bond Index | Municipal Bond Index | |
Six Months | 4.13% | | 4.62% | | |
One Year | 9.98 | | 13.15 | | |
Five Years | 4.50 | | 4.50 | | |
10 Years | 5.83 | | 6.50 | | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns) | | | |
Lipper Virginia Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
Six Months | | | 5.02% | |
One Year | | | 14.29 | | |
Five Years | | | 3.42 | | |
10 Years | | | 4.91 | | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are
calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering
price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and
principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more
or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only;
due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher
than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the
strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held
during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated.
Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1 Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered at net asset value. 2 Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.12% relating to the Fund’s liabili ty with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. 4 Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.74% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. 5 The Fund's SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 7 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Virginia Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 30, 29, 23 and 20 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.
25
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipal Income Fund as of Februar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments

* | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund's financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund's rating distribution at 2/28/10 is as follows: |
| | | |
AAA | 21.0% | BBB | 10.7% |
AA | 41.9% | BB | 1.1% |
A | 21.4% | Not Rated | 3.9% |
| |
Fund Statistics2 | |
|
• Number of Issues: | 72 |
• Average Maturity: | 23.1 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | 15.4 years |
• Average Call Protection: | 8.6 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | $102.02 |
• RIB Leverage3 : | 5.8% |
1 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security.
2 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements.
3 See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes reflect the effect of RIBs purchased in secondary market transactions.
26
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
FUN D EXP ENSES
Example: As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in a Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (September 1, 2009 – February 28, 2010).
Actual Expenses: The first section of each table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of each table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in each table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of each table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
| | | |
| Eaton Vance Alabama Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,056.00 | $3.77 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,051.20 | $7.58 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,052.10 | $7.58 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,057.00 | $2.75 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,021.10 | $3.71 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.40 | $7.45 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.40 | $7.45 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,022.10 | $2.71 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.74% for Class A shares, 1.49% for Class B shares, 1.49% for Class C shares and 0.54% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
27
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
FUN D EXP ENSES CONT’D
| | | |
| Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,053.90 | $3.77 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,050.00 | $7.57 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,050.00 | $7.57 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,021.10 | $3.71 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.40 | $7.45 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.40 | $7.45 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.74% for Class A shares, 1.49% for Class B shares and 1.49% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
| | | |
| Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,054.60 | $4.23 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,051.10 | $8.04 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,051.10 | $8.04 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,056.70 | $3.26 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,020.70 | $4.16 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.00 | $7.90 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.00 | $7.90 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,021.60 | $3.21 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.83% for Class A shares, 1.58% for Class B shares, 1.58% for Class C shares and 0.64% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
28
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
FUN D EXP ENSES CONT’D
| | | |
| Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,064.10 | $3.68 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,060.60 | $7.51 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,059.40 | $7.51 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,021.20 | $3.61 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.50 | $7.35 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.50 | $7.35 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.72% for Class A shares, 1.47% for Class B shares and 1.47% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
| | | |
| Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,060.30 | $3.58 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,055.70 | $7.39 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,056.70 | $7.39 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,021.30 | $3.51 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.60 | $7.25 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.60 | $7.25 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.70% for Class A shares, 1.45% for Class B shares and 1.45% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
29
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
FUN D EXP ENSES CONT’D
| | | |
| Eaton Vance Maryland Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,059.50 | $4.09 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,056.00 | $7.90 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,056.00 | $7.90 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,061.50 | $3.07 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,020.80 | $4.01 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.10 | $7.75 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.10 | $7.75 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,021.80 | $3.01 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.80% for Class A shares, 1.55% for Class B shares, 1.55% for Class C shares and 0.60% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
| | | |
| Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,051.90 | $3.87 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,047.10 | $7.66 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,047.20 | $7.66 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,021.00 | $3.81 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.30 | $7.55 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.30 | $7.55 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.76% for Class A shares, 1.51% for Class B shares and 1.51% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
30
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
FUN D EXP ENSES CONT’D
| | | |
| Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,052.60 | $4.28 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,049.20 | $8.08 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,049.20 | $8.08 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,054.70 | $3.26 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,020.60 | $4.21 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,016.90 | $7.95 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,016.90 | $7.95 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,021.60 | $3.21 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.84% for Class A shares, 1.59% for Class B shares, 1.59% for Class C shares and 0.64% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
| | | |
| Eaton Vance Oregon Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,050.70 | $4.12 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,046.70 | $7.92 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,046.70 | $7.92 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,020.80 | $4.06 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.10 | $7.80 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.10 | $7.80 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.81% for Class A shares, 1.56% for Class B shares and 1.56% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
31
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
FUN D EXP ENSES CONT’D
| | | |
| Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,049.30 | $3.91 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,045.20 | $7.71 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,045.10 | $7.71 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,050.30 | $2.95 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,021.00 | $3.86 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.30 | $7.60 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.30 | $7.60 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,021.90 | $2.91 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.77% for Class A shares, 1.52% for Class B shares, 1.52% for Class C shares and 0.58% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
| | | |
| Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,053.70 | $3.72 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,049.40 | $7.52 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,049.40 | $7.47 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,021.20 | $3.66 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.50 | $7.40 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.50 | $7.35 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.73% for Class A shares, 1.48% for Class B shares and 1.47% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
32
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
FUN D EXP ENSES CONT’D
| | | |
| Eaton Vance Virginia Municipal Income Fund | |
|
| Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* |
| (9/1/09) | (2/28/10) | (9/1/09 – 2/28/10) |
|
Actual | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,056.70 | $4.08 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,053.00 | $7.89 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,053.00 | $7.89 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,058.80 | $3.06 |
|
|
Hypothetical | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | |
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,020.80 | $4.01 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,017.10 | $7.75 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,017.10 | $7.75 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,021.80 | $3.01 |
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.80% for Class A shares, 1.55% for Class B shares, 1.55% for Class C shares and 0.60% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2009. |
33
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipal Income Fund as o f F e br uar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted)
| | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 99.1% | |
|
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Education — 2.8% | |
$1,500 | University of Alabama, 5.00%, 7/1/34 | $ 1,578,825 |
| | $ 1,578,825 |
|
Electric Utilities — 0.6% | |
$ 375 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/37 | $ 358,305 |
| | $ 358,305 |
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.4% | |
$1,250 | Huntsville, Health Care Authority, Prerefunded to 6/1/11, | |
| 5.75%, 6/1/31 | $ 1,346,075 |
| | $ 1,346,075 |
|
General Obligations — 9.7% | |
$1,000 | Auburn, 5.25%, 12/1/27 | $ 1,094,680 |
1,125 | Huntsville, 5.25%, 5/1/31 | 1,192,916 |
1,250 | Madison, 5.15%, 2/1/39 | 1,284,175 |
1,000 | Mobile, 5.00%, 2/15/27 | 1,047,830 |
1,000 | Mobile County, 4.50%, 6/1/34(1) | 961,390 |
| | $ 5,580,991 |
|
Hospital — 12.1% | |
$1,740 | Alabama Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, | |
| (Ascension Health), 5.00%, 11/15/39(2) | $ 1,748,744 |
1,500 | Birmingham Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, | |
| (Children’s Hospital), 6.125%, 6/1/34 | 1,546,320 |
400 | Health Care Authority, (Baptist Health), | |
| 5.00%, 11/15/16 | 412,604 |
750 | Health Care Authority, (Baptist Health), | |
| 5.00%, 11/15/18 | 755,880 |
400 | Health Care Authority, (Baptist Health), | |
| 5.00%, 11/15/21 | 392,668 |
1,000 | Marshall County, Health Care Authority, 5.75%, 1/1/32 | 996,220 |
1,000 | University of Alabama, Hospital Revenue, | |
| 5.75%, 9/1/22 | 1,089,070 |
| | $ 6,941,506 |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 4.0% | |
$ 600 | Butler Industrial Development Board, (Georgia-Pacific | |
| Corp.), (AMT), 5.75%, 9/1/28 | $ 544,752 |
750 | Phoenix County, Industrial Development Board | |
| Environmental Improvements, 6.10%, 5/15/30 | 675,225 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Industrial Development Revenue (continued) |
$1,180 | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), | |
| (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 | $ 871,560 |
250 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), | |
| (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | 223,875 |
| | $ 2,315,412 |
|
Insured-Education — 12.3% | |
$1,000 | Alabama State Board of Education, (Chattahoochee Valley | |
| Community College), (AGC), 5.00%, 6/1/34 | $ 1,029,070 |
500 | Alabama State University, (AGC), 4.75%, 5/1/33 | 504,180 |
1,885 | Alabama State University, (XLCA), 4.625%, 8/1/36 | 1,791,165 |
1,250 | Auburn University, (AGM), 5.00%, 6/1/38 | 1,276,625 |
1,230 | Jacksonville State University, (AGC), 5.125%, 12/1/33 | 1,266,211 |
1,110 | Montgomery, Public Educational Building Authority, | |
| (Alabama State University), (XLCA), 5.25%, 10/1/25 | 1,162,481 |
| | $ 7,029,732 |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 1.9% | |
$ 400 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (BHAC), (FGIC), | |
| (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/24 | $ 451,356 |
625 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/35 | 624,088 |
| | $ 1,075,444 |
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 13.6% | |
$2,500 | Birmingham, Waterworks and Sewer Board, (NPFG), | |
| Prerefunded to 1/1/13, 5.25%, 1/1/33 | $ 2,810,650 |
445 | Helena, Utilities Board Water and Sewer, (NPFG), | |
| Prerefunded to 4/1/12, 5.25%, 4/1/27 | 492,304 |
555 | Helena, Utilities Board Water and Sewer, (NPFG), | |
| Prerefunded to 4/1/12, 5.25%, 4/1/27 | 613,996 |
450 | Helena, Utilities Board Water and Sewer, (NPFG), | |
| Prerefunded to 4/1/12, 5.25%, 4/1/33 | 497,835 |
550 | Helena, Utilities Board Water and Sewer, (NPFG), | |
| Prerefunded to 4/1/12, 5.25%, 4/1/33 | 608,465 |
2,065 | Montgomery, BMC Special Care Facilities Financing | |
| Authority, (Baptist Health Montgomery), (NPFG), | |
| Prerefunded to 11/15/14, 5.15%, 11/15/27 | 2,388,049 |
330 | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to | |
| Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | 399,369 |
| | $ 7,810,668 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 8.0% | |
$2,000 | Gadsden, (AMBAC), 5.125%, 8/1/28 | $ 2,035,980 |
1,000 | Homewood, (AGM), 4.25%, 9/1/31 | 965,770 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
34 |
| | |
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-General Obligations (continued) | |
$ 500 | Mobile, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 2/15/30 | $ 513,215 |
1,000 | Pell City, (XLCA), 5.00%, 2/1/24 | 1,038,390 |
| | $ 4,553,355 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 2.5% | |
$1,500 | East Alabama, Health Care Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.00%, 9/1/27 | $ 1,457,385 |
| | $ 1,457,385 |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 5.2% | |
$ 800 | Leeds, Public Educational Building Authority, (AGC), | |
| 5.125%, 4/1/33 | $ 815,624 |
120 | Mobile, Public Educational Building Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 4.50%, 3/1/31 | 115,574 |
500 | Montgomery County, Public Building Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.00%, 3/1/31 | 513,835 |
770 | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to | |
| Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | 931,862 |
520 | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (Commonwealth | |
| Appropriation), (AMBAC), 5.125%, 6/1/24(3) | 589,888 |
| | $ 2,966,783 |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 4.8% | |
$2,800 | Alabama Public School and College Authority, (AGM), | |
| 2.50%, 12/1/27(4) | $ 2,099,972 |
1,105 | Birmingham-Jefferson Civic Center Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 9/1/18 | 675,210 |
| | $ 2,775,182 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 3.4% | |
$1,000 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, | |
| (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/16 | $ 739,340 |
1,185 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, | |
| (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/29 | 1,214,826 |
| | $ 1,954,166 |
|
Insured-Utilities — 1.8% | |
$1,000 | Foley, Utilities Board, (AGM), 4.75%, 11/1/31 | $ 1,003,390 |
| | $ 1,003,390 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 7.8% | |
$2,410 | Alabama Drinking Water Finance Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 4.00%, 8/15/28 | $ 2,208,813 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer (continued) | |
$ 800 | Birmingham, Waterworks and Sewer Board, (AGM), | |
| 4.50%, 1/1/35 | $ 780,080 |
255 | Birmingham, Waterworks and Sewer Board, (AMBAC), | |
| 4.50%, 1/1/39 | 233,080 |
270 | Limestone County, Water and Sewer Authority, (XLCA), | |
| 4.25%, 12/1/29 | 233,931 |
1,000 | Mobile Water and Sewer Commissioners, (NPFG), | |
| 5.00%, 1/1/31 | 1,024,360 |
| | $ 4,480,264 |
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 0.9% |
$ 500 | Puerto Rico, (Guaynabo Municipal Government Center | |
| Lease), 5.625%, 7/1/22 | $ 500,415 |
| | $ 500,415 |
|
Other Revenue — 2.8% | |
$1,500 | Alabama Incentives Financing Authority, 5.00%, 9/1/29 | $ 1,578,870 |
| | $ 1,578,870 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 2.5% | |
$ 145 | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.625%, 12/1/29 | $ 147,217 |
155 | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.75%, 12/1/34 | 157,415 |
780 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | 774,431 |
325 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37 | 352,787 |
| | $ 1,431,850 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.1% | |
(identified cost $55,005,307) | $56,738,618 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.9% | $ 517,528 |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $57,256,146 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp. FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp. XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
35 |
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipal Income Fund as o f F e br uar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Alabama
municipalities. In addition, 13.0% of the Fund’s net assets at
February 28, 2010 were invested in municipal obligations issued by
Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet
their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a
specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk
associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2010,
61.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various
financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The
aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution
ranged from 0.8% to 21.4% of total investments.
(1) | When-issued security. |
(2) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
(3) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
(4) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
36 |
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipal Income Fund as of F e br uar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted)
| | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 97.0% | |
|
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Education — 0.4% | |
$ 250 | University of Arkansas, 5.00%, 12/1/29 | $ 261,655 |
| | $ 261,655 |
|
General Obligations — 21.8% | |
$ 750 | Arkansas, 4.75%, 6/1/29 | $ 797,512 |
2,750 | Arkansas State College Savings, 0.00%, 6/1/14 | 2,566,300 |
1,000 | Arkansas Water, Waste Disposal and Pollution Facilities, | |
| 4.875%, 7/1/43 | 1,020,260 |
750 | Benton, School District No. 8, 4.80%, 2/1/38 | 750,773 |
1,000 | Benton, School District No. 8, 4.85%, 2/1/40 | 1,002,720 |
315 | Bradford, Special School District, 4.75%, 2/1/39 | 317,744 |
1,490 | Bryant, School District No. 25, 4.75%, 2/1/39 | 1,499,059 |
750 | Conway, School District No. 1, 4.75%, 2/1/34 | 748,913 |
1,000 | Farmington, School District No. 6, 4.60%, 6/1/33 | 975,510 |
390 | Forrest City, School District No. 7, 4.50%, 2/1/32 | 391,856 |
595 | Forrest City, School District No. 7, 4.625%, 2/1/35 | 598,415 |
1,365 | Greenwood, School District No. 25, 4.20%, 12/1/26 | 1,370,132 |
1,000 | Harmony Grove, School District No. 1, 4.90%, 2/1/39 | 1,006,290 |
350 | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Government | |
| Facilities, 5.00%, 7/1/36 | 323,488 |
500 | Pulaski County, Special School District, 5.00%, 2/1/35 | 506,720 |
875 | Sheridan, School District No. 37, 4.375%, 2/1/30 | 875,096 |
1,000 | Siloam Springs, School District No. 21, 4.60%, 6/1/34 | 992,130 |
| | $15,742,918 |
|
Hospital — 0.9% | |
$ 430 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (White River | |
| Medical Center), 5.60%, 6/1/24 | $ 426,212 |
250 | North Little Rock, Health Facilities Board, (Baptist Health), | |
| 5.70%, 7/1/22 | 252,717 |
| | $ 678,929 |
|
Housing — 4.4% | |
$ 435 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, SFMR, (GNMA), | |
| (AMT), 5.125%, 7/1/24 | $ 441,982 |
1,175 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, SFMR, | |
| (GNMA/FNMA), (AMT), 4.75%, 7/1/32 | 1,141,830 |
860 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, SFMR, | |
| (GNMA/FNMA), (AMT), 4.80%, 7/1/26 | 856,095 |
110 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, SFMR, | |
| (GNMA/FNMA), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/29 | 110,079 |
210 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, SFMR, | |
| (GNMA/FNMA), (AMT), 5.05%, 7/1/31 | 211,359 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Housing (continued) | |
$ 380 | North Little Rock Residential Housing Facilities, (Parkstone | |
| Place), 6.50%, 8/1/21 | $ 375,463 |
| | $ 3,136,808 |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 5.8% | |
$ 400 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Industrial Facility | |
| Revenue, (Potlatch Corp.), (AMT), 7.75%, 8/1/25 | $ 407,772 |
2,000 | Baxter, (Aeroquip Corp.), 5.80%, 10/1/13 | 2,249,140 |
250 | Pine Bluff, Environmental Improvements Revenue, | |
| (International Paper Co.), (AMT), 6.70%, 8/1/20 | 252,710 |
1,150 | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), | |
| (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 | 849,401 |
475 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), | |
| (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | 425,363 |
| | $ 4,184,386 |
|
Insured-Education — 13.2% | |
$1,000 | Arkansas State University, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 9/1/35 | $ 1,015,390 |
1,000 | Arkansas State University, (Consolidated Building System), | |
| (AMBAC), 5.00%, 4/1/24 | 1,071,200 |
1,250 | Arkansas State University, (Student Fee), (AMBAC), | |
| 5.00%, 3/1/32 | 1,251,538 |
2,155 | Pulaski Technical College, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/1/36 | 2,105,176 |
1,000 | University of Arkansas, (Fayetteville Campus), (AMBAC), | |
| 5.00%, 11/1/36 | 1,029,090 |
500 | University of Arkansas, (Fayetteville Campus), (FGIC), | |
| (NPFG), 5.00%, 12/1/32 | 507,825 |
500 | University of Arkansas, (Fayetteville Campus), (NPFG), | |
| 4.75%, 11/1/24 | 520,670 |
1,000 | University of Arkansas, (Pine Bluffs Campus), (AMBAC), | |
| 5.00%, 12/1/35 | 1,026,090 |
1,000 | University of Arkansas, (UAMS Campus), (NPFG), | |
| 5.00%, 11/1/34 | 1,022,520 |
| | $ 9,549,499 |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 4.4% | |
$ 55 | North Little Rock, Electric System, (NPFG), | |
| 6.50%, 7/1/10 | $ 55,887 |
1,000 | North Little Rock, Electric System, (NPFG), | |
| 6.50%, 7/1/15 | 1,126,750 |
650 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/30 | 663,039 |
550 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/34 | 549,208 |
750 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/29 | 766,470 |
| | $ 3,161,354 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
37 |
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipal Income Fund as of F e br uar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.3% | |
$ 500 | Harrison, Residential Housing Facility Board, SFMR, | |
| (FGIC), Escrowed to Maturity, 7.40%, 9/1/11 | $ 550,850 |
400 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (AGM), Prerefunded | |
| to 7/1/10, 5.25%, 7/1/29 | 411,056 |
| | $ 961,906 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 2.0% | |
$ 500 | Arkansas State College Savings, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 6/1/17 | $ 395,495 |
500 | Little Rock, School District, (AGM), 5.25%, 2/1/33 | 509,510 |
480 | Puerto Rico, (NPFG), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | 507,115 |
| | $ 1,412,120 |
|
Insured-Health — Miscellaneous — 1.1% | |
$ 245 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Public Health | |
| Laboratory), (AMBAC), 3.90%, 12/1/24 | $ 245,397 |
500 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Public Health | |
| Laboratory), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/18 | 530,540 |
| | $ 775,937 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 6.3% | |
$1,140 | Heber Springs, Hospital and Health Care Facilities Board, | |
| (Baptist Healthcare System), (CIFG), 5.00%, 5/1/26 | $ 1,166,676 |
1,500 | Pulaski County, (Children’s Hospital), (AMBAC), | |
| 5.00%, 3/1/30 | 1,524,570 |
1,565 | Pulaski County, (Children’s Hospital), (AMBAC), | |
| 5.00%, 3/1/35 | 1,570,493 |
295 | Saline County, Retirement Housing and Healthcare | |
| Facilities Board, (Evan Lutheran Good Samaritan), | |
| (AMBAC), 5.80%, 6/1/11 | 296,151 |
| | $ 4,557,890 |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 3.7% | |
$ 425 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/34 | $ 438,205 |
1,000 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, SFMR, | |
| (Donaghey Plaza), (AGM), 5.00%, 6/1/29 | 1,043,770 |
1,000 | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to | |
| Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | 1,210,210 |
| | $ 2,692,185 |
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 4.9% | |
$1,000 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Tobacco | |
| Settlement Revenue, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/24 | $ 539,490 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Other Revenue (continued) | |
$1,320 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Tobacco | |
| Settlement Revenue, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/30 | $ 486,711 |
3,500 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Tobacco | |
| Settlement Revenue, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/36 | 905,485 |
7,690 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Tobacco | |
| Settlement Revenue, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/46 | 1,107,129 |
500 | University of Arkansas, Parking Revenue, (NPFG), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/29 | 510,600 |
| | $ 3,549,415 |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 4.8% | |
$ 405 | Bentonville Sales and Use Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), | |
| 4.375%, 11/1/27 | $ 406,948 |
1,000 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/27 | 1,005,490 |
1,000 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/42 | 103,640 |
4,465 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 257,675 |
1,070 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 132,220 |
7,480 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 859,452 |
1,695 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 182,196 |
535 | Springdale Sales and Use Tax Revenue, (AGM), | |
| 4.00%, 7/1/27 | 523,374 |
| | $ 3,470,995 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 1.7% | |
$1,200 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), | |
| (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | $ 1,233,684 |
| | $ 1,233,684 |
|
Insured-Utilities — 2.0% | |
$1,435 | Benton, Utilities Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 9/1/36 | $ 1,437,511 |
| | $ 1,437,511 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 9.7% | |
$ 515 | Arkansas Community Water System, Public Water | |
| Authority, (NPFG), 5.00%, 10/1/33 | $ 518,837 |
500 | Arkansas Community Water System, Public Water | |
| Authority, (NPFG), 5.00%, 10/1/42 | 501,785 |
500 | Conway, Water Revenue, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.125%, 12/1/23 | 504,955 |
1,145 | Fort Smith, Water and Sewer, (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/23 | 1,198,826 |
500 | Fort Smith, Water and Sewer, (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/32 | 522,355 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
38 |
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipal Income Fund as of F e br uar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
Insured-Water and Sewer (continued) | |
$1,000 | Little Rock, Sewer Revenue, (AGM), 4.75%, 6/1/37 | $ 998,410 |
450 | Little Rock, Sewer Revenue, (AGM), 5.00%, 6/1/31 | 465,188 |
750 | Little Rock, Sewer Revenue, (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/32 | 773,385 |
500 | Rogers, Sewer Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 2/1/32 | 505,820 |
1,000 | Rogers, Water Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 2/1/37 | 999,960 |
| | $ 6,989,521 |
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 2.1% |
$1,500 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Correctional | |
| Facilities, 5.125%, 5/15/39 | $ 1,515,810 |
| | $ 1,515,810 |
|
Other Revenue — 0.4% | |
$7,250 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/50 | $ 270,062 |
| | $ 270,062 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 5.1% | |
$2,000 | Little Rock, Hotel and Restaurant Gross Receipts Tax, | |
| 7.375%, 8/1/15 | $ 2,305,920 |
790 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | 784,359 |
125 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/39 | 112,715 |
435 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37 | 472,193 |
| | $ 3,675,187 |
|
Transportation — 0.6% | |
$ 500 | Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport Authority, (AMT), | |
| 5.00%, 2/1/18 | $ 456,385 |
| | $ 456,385 |
|
Water and Sewer — 0.4% | |
$ 250 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Waste Water | |
| System), 5.50%, 12/1/19 | $ 299,177 |
| | $ 299,177 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 97.0% | |
(identified cost $70,211,679) | $70,013,334 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 3.0% | $ 2,172,663 |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $72,185,997 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc. FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company FNMA - Federal National Mortgage Association GNMA - Government National Mortgage Association NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp. SFMR - Single Family Mortgage Revenue
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Arkansas municipalities. In addition, 14.0% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2010 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2010, 56.8% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.8% to 29.3% of total investments.
(1) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
39 |
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted)
| | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 108. 1% | |
|
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Education — 10.1% | |
$1,600 | Athens-Clarke County Unified Government Development | |
| Authority, Educational Facilities, 4.50%, 6/15/38 | $ 1,554,976 |
1,000 | Atlanta Development Authority, Educational Facilities, | |
| 4.75%, 7/1/27 | 1,002,710 |
950 | Atlanta Development Authority, Educational Facilities, | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/39 | 953,411 |
1,500 | Fulton County Development Authority, (Georgia Technology | |
| Foundation), 5.00%, 11/1/31 | 1,541,010 |
1,995 | Georgia Private Colleges and Universities Authority, (Emory | |
| University), 5.00%, 9/1/38(1) | 2,084,276 |
1,505 | Georgia Private Colleges and Universities Authority, (Emory | |
| University), 5.00%, 9/1/38 | 1,572,349 |
| | $ 8,708,732 |
|
Electric Utilities — 1.2% | |
$1,000 | Burke County Development Authority, (Oglethorpe Power | |
| Corp.), 5.50%, 1/1/33 | $ 1,037,310 |
| | $ 1,037,310 |
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.2% | |
$ 800 | Forsyth County Hospital Authority, (Georgia Baptist Health | |
| Care System), Escrowed to Maturity, 6.375%, 10/1/28 | $ 1,014,704 |
| | $ 1,014,704 |
|
General Obligations — 13.7% | |
$1,750 | Gainesville and Hall County Hospital Authority, (Northeast | |
| Georgia Medical Center), 5.00%, 2/15/33 | $ 1,728,772 |
2,000 | Georgia, 1.00%, 3/1/26(2) | 1,289,100 |
500 | Georgia, 2.00%, 12/1/23 | 416,520 |
500 | Georgia, 2.00%, 8/1/27 | 376,665 |
6,000 | Gwinnett County, School District, 5.00%, 2/1/36(1) | 6,360,210 |
500 | Lagrange-Troup County Hospital Authority, (West Georgia | |
| Health Foundation, Inc.), 5.50%, 7/1/38 | 514,105 |
1,000 | Lincoln County, School District, 5.50%, 4/1/37 | 1,066,240 |
| | $11,751,612 |
|
Hospital — 6.5% | |
$ 750 | Floyd County Hospital Authority, (Floyd Health Medical | |
| Center), 5.25%, 7/1/29 | $ 797,790 |
3,000 | Fulton County Development Authority, (Children’s | |
| Healthcare of Atlanta), 5.25%, 11/15/39 | 3,052,320 |
750 | Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital Authority, (Georgia | |
| Medical Center), 5.625%, 8/1/34 | 744,548 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Hospital (continued) | |
$1,000 | Macon-Bibb County Hospital Authority, (The Medical Center | |
| of Central Georgia), 5.00%, 8/1/35 | $ 1,005,190 |
| | $ 5,599,848 |
|
Housing — 5.3% | |
$1,000 | Georgia Housing and Finance Authority, (AMT), | |
| 4.85%, 12/1/37 | $ 954,450 |
1,000 | Georgia Housing and Finance Authority, (AMT), | |
| 4.90%, 12/1/31 | 981,550 |
2,000 | Georgia Housing and Finance Authority, (AMT), | |
| 5.25%, 12/1/37 | 2,037,300 |
600 | Georgia Private Colleges and Universities Authority, Student | |
| Housing Revenue, (Mercer Housing Corp.), | |
| 6.00%, 6/1/31 | 569,586 |
| | $ 4,542,886 |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 8.2% | |
$2,000 | Albany Dougherty Payroll Development Authority, Solid | |
| Waste Disposal, (Procter and Gamble), (AMT), | |
| 5.20%, 5/15/28 | $ 2,074,060 |
700 | Cartersville Development Authority, (Anheuser-Busch), | |
| (AMT), 5.95%, 2/1/32 | 707,525 |
1,000 | Cobb County Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, | |
| (Georgia Waste Management Project), (AMT), | |
| 5.00%, 4/1/33 | 962,830 |
750 | Effingham County, Solid Waste Disposal, (Fort James | |
| Project), (AMT), 5.625%, 7/1/18 | 725,948 |
1,250 | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), | |
| (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 | 923,262 |
990 | Savannah Economic Development Authority, (Intercat- | |
| Savannah), (AMT), 7.00%, 1/1/38 | 766,448 |
730 | Vienna Water and Sewer, (Cargill), (AMT), | |
| 6.00%, 9/1/14 | 731,635 |
225 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), | |
| (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | 201,488 |
| | $ 7,093,196 |
|
Insured-Education — 2.9% | |
$ 500 | Fulton County Development Authority, (Morehouse | |
| College), (AMBAC), 4.50%, 6/1/37 | $ 471,490 |
930 | Georgia Private Colleges and Universities Authority, (Agnes | |
| Scott College), (NPFG), 4.75%, 6/1/28 | 935,264 |
1,085 | South Regional Joint Development Authority, (Valdosta | |
| State University), (XLCA), 5.00%, 8/1/38 | 1,084,956 |
| | $ 2,491,710 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
40 |
| | |
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 7.9% | |
$ 280 | Georgia Municipal Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 1/1/12 | $ 258,773 |
3,005 | Georgia Municipal Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.50%, 1/1/20 | 3,480,121 |
390 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/30 | 397,823 |
455 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/34 | 454,345 |
750 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/35 | 748,905 |
1,450 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/29 | 1,481,842 |
| | $ 6,821,809 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 1.4% | |
$ 660 | Fayette County, School District, (AGM), 4.95%, (0.00% | |
| until 9/1/10), 3/1/25 | $ 669,880 |
480 | Puerto Rico, (NPFG), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | 507,115 |
| | $ 1,176,995 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 4.7% | |
$1,190 | Clarke County Hospital Authority, (Athens Regional Medical | |
| Center), (NPFG), 5.00%, 1/1/32 | $ 1,209,921 |
1,750 | Cobb County Kennestone Hospital Authority, (Wellstar | |
| Health System), (AMBAC), 5.50%, 4/1/37 | 1,811,600 |
1,000 | Henry County Hospital Authority Revenue, (Henry Medical | |
| Center, Inc.), (AMBAC), 6.00%, 7/1/29 | 1,024,470 |
| | $ 4,045,991 |
|
Insured-Housing — 0.1% | |
$ 100 | Peach County Development Authority, (Fort Valley State | |
| University Foundation), (AMBAC), 4.50%, 6/1/37 | $ 92,455 |
| | $ 92,455 |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 4.3% | |
$ 745 | Atlanta Downtown Development Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 4.50%, 12/1/26 | $ 750,215 |
962 | Georgia Local Government Certificate of Participation, | |
| (NPFG), 4.75%, 6/1/28 | 871,197 |
1,000 | Georgia Municipal Association, Inc. Certificate of | |
| Participation, (Riverdale), (AGC), 5.375%, 5/1/32 | 1,044,480 |
1,000 | Georgia State University Higher Education Facilities | |
| Authority, (USG Real Estate Foundation), (AGC), | |
| 5.625%, 6/15/38 | 1,048,890 |
| | $ 3,714,782 |
| | | |
Principal Amount | | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 0.9% | |
$ 800 | Downtown Savannah Authority, (Savannah Ellis Square | |
| Parking), (NPFG), 4.75%, 8/1/32 | $ 803,776 |
| | | $ 803,776 |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 4.6% | |
$1,000 | George L. Smith II Georgia World Congress Center | |
Authority, (Domed Stadium Project), (NPFG), (AMT), |
| 5.50%, | 7/1/20 | $ 1,005,720 |
1,600 | Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, | 7/1/34(1) | 1,662,168 |
4,000 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, | 7/1/34 | 734,120 |
545 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 5.50%, | 7/1/27 | 547,992 |
| | | $ 3,950,000 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 5.5% | |
$ 785 | Atlanta, Airport Passenger Facility Charge, (AGM), | |
| 4.75%, | 1/1/28 | $ 790,016 |
500 | Atlanta, Airport Revenue, (FGIC), (NPFG), (AMT), | |
| 5.625%, 1/1/25 | 504,335 |
1,000 | Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 6.25%, | 7/1/20 | 1,207,170 |
1,780 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), | |
| (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | 1,829,965 |
555 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, | |
| (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/18 | 362,015 |
| | | $ 4,693,501 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 19.6% | |
$2,000 | Atlanta, Water and Wastewater, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, | 11/1/34 | $ 2,014,780 |
455 | Atlanta, Water and Wastewater, (NPFG), | |
| 5.00%, | 11/1/39 | 438,616 |
2,100 | Columbus, Water and Sewer, (AGM), 5.00%, 5/1/30 | 2,173,143 |
1,135 | Coweta County, Water and Sewer Authority, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, | 6/1/26 | 1,314,046 |
2,000 | De Kalb County, Water and Sewer, (AGM), | |
| 5.25%, | 10/1/32 | 2,265,800 |
3,000 | Douglasville-Douglas County, Water and Sewer Authority, | |
| (NPFG), 5.00%, 6/1/37 | 3,067,590 |
1,000 | Henry County, Water and Sewer Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, | 2/1/25 | 1,177,820 |
1,000 | Henry County, Water and Sewer Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, | 2/1/30 | 1,151,090 |
1,040 | Newnan, Water, Sewer and Light Commission, (AMBAC), | |
| 5.25%, | 1/1/24 | 1,209,707 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
41 |
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer (continued) | |
$1,000 | Walton County, Water and Sewer Authority, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, 2/1/33 | $ 1,022,960 |
1,000 | Walton County, Water and Sewer Authority, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, 2/1/38 | 1,016,990 |
| | $16,852,542 |
|
Other Revenue — 0.8% | |
$ 670 | Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., 5.00%, 3/15/22 | $ 652,707 |
| | $ 652,707 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 3.7% | |
$ 205 | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.625%, 12/1/29 | $ 208,134 |
220 | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.75%, 12/1/34 | 223,428 |
7,255 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0.00%, 8/1/56 | 367,901 |
1,925 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | 1,911,255 |
435 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37 | 472,193 |
| | $ 3,182,911 |
|
Transportation — 0.2% | |
$ 215 | Augusta, Airport Revenue, 5.15%, 1/1/35 | $ 184,380 |
| | $ 184,380 |
|
Water and Sewer — 5.3% | |
$1,000 | Athens-Clarke County, Unified Government Water and | |
| Sewer Revenue, 5.50%, 1/1/38 | $ 1,074,520 |
800 | Cherokee County, Water and Sewer Authority, | |
| 5.00%, 8/1/28 | 866,240 |
500 | Coweta County, Water and Sewer Authority, | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/32 | 518,460 |
2,000 | Coweta County, Water and Sewer Authority, | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/37 | 2,057,120 |
| | $ 4,516,340 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 108.1% | |
(identified cost $91,267,358) | $92,928,187 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (8.1)% | $ (6,938,919) |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $85,989,268 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc. FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp. XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Georgia municipalities. In addition, 11.9% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2010 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2010, 48.0% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.2% to 20.7% of total investments.
(1) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
(2) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
42 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) | | | | |
| | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 98.2% | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
Education — 2.1% | |
$1,280 | Campbellsville, (Campbellsville University), | |
| 5.70%, 3/1/34 | $ 1,152,064 |
| | $ 1,152,064 |
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 5.8% | |
$1,465 | Bowling Green, Prerefunded to 6/1/10, | |
| 5.30%, 6/1/19 | $ 1,496,497 |
2,250 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Escrowed to various | |
| sinking fund dates through 7/1/17, Series O, | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/17 | 1,720,800 |
| | $ 3,217,297 |
|
General Obligations — 1.4% | |
$ 750 | Kenton County, 4.625%, 4/1/34 | $ 751,988 |
| | $ 751,988 |
|
Hospital — 3.5% | |
$ 500 | Kentucky Economic Development Authority, (Baptist | |
| Healthcare System), 5.625%, 8/15/27 | $ 546,605 |
500 | Kentucky Economic Development Authority, (Catholic | |
| Health Initiatives), 5.00%, 5/1/29 | 512,545 |
1,000 | Murray Hospital Facilities, (Murray Calloway County | |
| Hospital), 5.125%, 8/1/37 | 857,880 |
| | $ 1,917,030 |
|
Housing — 6.3% | |
$ 440 | Kentucky Housing Corp., (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/37 | $ 430,976 |
2,000 | Kentucky Housing Corp., (AMT), 5.30%, 1/1/38 | 2,056,180 |
1,000 | Kentucky Housing Corp., (Urban Florence I, L.P.), (AMT), | |
| 5.00% to 6/1/23 (Put Date), 6/1/35 | 1,015,750 |
| | $ 3,502,906 |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 5.2% | |
$ 500 | Owen County, (American Water Project), 6.25%, 6/1/39 | $ 533,615 |
695 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), | |
| (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | 622,372 |
1,820 | Wickliffe, Solid Waste Disposal, (Westvaco Corp.), (AMT), | |
| 6.375%, 4/1/26 | 1,706,032 |
| | $ 2,862,019 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 13.6% | |
$1,000 | Carroll County, Environmental Facilities, (AMBAC), (AMT), | |
| 5.75%, 2/1/26 | $ 1,021,650 |
1,000 | Kentucky Municipal Power Agency, (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 9/1/27 | 1,053,220 |
2,000 | Kentucky Municipal Power Agency, (Prairie Street Project), | |
| (NPFG), 5.00%, 9/1/37 | 2,007,440 |
2,000 | Owensboro, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 1/1/20 | 1,259,700 |
1,200 | Paducah Electric Plant Board, (AGC), 5.25%, 10/1/35 | 1,244,748 |
400 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (BHAC), (FGIC), | |
| (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/24 | 451,356 |
500 | Trimble County, Environmental Facilities, (AMBAC), (AMT), | |
| 6.00%, 3/1/37 | 491,465 |
| | $ 7,529,579 |
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.9% | |
$1,000 | Kentucky Property and Buildings Commission, (AGM), | |
| Prerefunded to 8/1/11, 5.00%, 8/1/21 | $ 1,065,370 |
| | $ 1,065,370 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 3.0% | |
$ 600 | Puerto Rico, (NPFG), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | $ 633,894 |
1,000 | Warren County, (Judicial Office Building and Parks), | |
| (AMBAC), 5.20%, 9/1/29 | 1,046,120 |
| | $ 1,680,014 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 5.7% | |
$ 850 | Jefferson County, Health Facilities Authority, (University | |
| Medical Center), (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/22 | $ 850,204 |
6,775 | Kentucky Economic Development Authority, (Norton | |
| Healthcare, Inc.), (NPFG), 0.00%, 10/1/27 | 2,278,297 |
| | $ 3,128,501 |
|
Insured-Industrial Development Revenue — 0.5% |
$ 250 | Boone County, (Dayton Power & Light Co. (The)), | |
| (FGIC), 4.70%, 1/1/28 | $ 250,313 |
| | $ 250,313 |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 14.0% | |
$1,350 | Hardin County, School District Finance Corp. School | |
| Building, (AGM), 4.75%, 7/1/21 | $ 1,386,193 |
1,000 | Jefferson County, School District Finance Corp. School | |
| Building, (AGM), 4.50%, 7/1/23 | 1,042,540 |
1,150 | Kentucky Area Development Districts, (XLCA), | |
| 4.70%, 6/1/35 | 1,064,992 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
43 |
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipal Income Fund as of F e br uar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation (continued) | |
$ 500 | Kentucky Property and Buildings Commission, (AGC), | |
| 5.25%, 2/1/29 | $ 537,590 |
500 | Kentucky Property and Buildings Commission, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, 11/1/26 | 534,070 |
1,000 | Louisville, Parking Authority, (NPFG), 5.00%, 6/1/32 | 1,011,440 |
865 | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/21 | 892,213 |
1,000 | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (XLCA), | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/21 | 1,031,460 |
255 | Wayne County, School District Finance Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 4.00%, 7/1/25 | 255,538 |
| | $ 7,756,036 |
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 2.0% | |
$1,000 | Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, | |
| (Louisville Arena), (AGC), 6.00%, 12/1/42 | $ 1,080,980 |
| | $ 1,080,980 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 6.2% | |
$1,000 | Louisville Regional Airport Authority, (AGM), (AMT), | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/38 | $ 1,016,650 |
3,690 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, | |
| (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/18 | 2,406,913 |
| | $ 3,423,563 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 15.1% | |
$1,500 | Boone-Florence Water Commission, Water Supply System, | |
| (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 12/1/27 | $ 1,527,120 |
1,000 | Campbell and Kenton County, District No. 1, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, 8/1/31 | 1,006,550 |
1,500 | Campbell and Kenton County, Sanitation District No. 1, | |
| (NPFG), 4.375%, 8/1/35 | 1,438,800 |
1,060 | Kentucky Rural Water Finance Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 4.70%, 8/1/35 | 1,056,226 |
500 | Louisville and Jefferson County, Metropolitan Sewer District | |
| and Drainage System, (AGC), 4.25%, 5/15/38 | 482,820 |
2,250 | Louisville and Jefferson County, Metropolitan Sewer District | |
| and Drainage System, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/15/38 | 2,274,998 |
290 | Owensboro, (AGC), 5.00%, 9/15/27 | 310,390 |
225 | Owensboro, (AGC), 5.00%, 9/15/31 | 233,881 |
| | $ 8,330,785 |
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 7.4% |
$3,700 | Jefferson County, (Capital Projects Corp.), | |
| 0.00%, 8/15/15 | $ 3,261,624 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation (continued) | |
$ 750 | Kentucky Property and Buildings Commission, | |
| 5.50%, 11/1/28 | $ 821,977 |
| | $ 4,083,601 |
|
Other Revenue — 0.5% | |
$4,200 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/50 | $ 156,450 |
7,595 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/55 | 144,913 |
| | $ 301,363 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 1.1% | |
$ 70 | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.625%, 12/1/29 | $ 71,070 |
75 | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.75%, 12/1/34 | 76,169 |
125 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/39 | 112,715 |
325 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37 | 352,787 |
| | $ 612,741 |
|
Transportation — 2.9% | |
$ 500 | Kentucky Turnpike Authority, (Revitalization Project), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/28 | $ 529,700 |
1,000 | Kentucky Turnpike Authority, (Revitalization Project), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/29 | 1,056,510 |
| | $ 1,586,210 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 98.2% | |
(identified cost $52,968,275) | $54,232,360 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 1.8% | $ 990,915 |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $55,223,275 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp. FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp. XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
44 |
| | | |
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Kentucky
municipalities. In addition, 13.5% of the Fund’s net assets at
February 28, 2010 were invested in municipal obligations issued by
Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet
their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a
specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk
associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2010,
63.1% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various
financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The
aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution
ranged from 0.8% to 27.4% of total investments.
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
45 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) | | | | |
| | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 99.5% | |
|
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Electric Utilities — 0.9% | |
$ 375 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/37 | $ 358,305 |
| | $ 358,305 |
|
Hospital — 7.3% | |
$1,000 | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Ochsner Clinic | |
| Foundation), 5.50%, 5/15/47 | $ 896,380 |
1,000 | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Our Lady of Lake | |
| Medical Center), 6.75%, 7/1/39 | 1,082,710 |
1,010 | Tangipahoa Parish, Hospital Service District No. 1, (North | |
| Oaks Medical Center), 5.00%, 2/1/30 | 903,152 |
| | $ 2,882,242 |
|
Housing — 7.0% | |
$ 500 | East Baton Rouge Mortgage Finance Authority, | |
| (GNMA/FNMA/FHLMC), 5.00%, 10/1/34 | $ 504,340 |
760 | East Baton Rouge Mortgage Finance Authority, | |
| (GNMA/FNMA/FHLMC), 5.10%, 10/1/40 | 772,130 |
480 | Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, | |
| (GNMA/FNMA/FHLMC), (AMT), 4.80%, 12/1/38 | 475,248 |
895 | Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, | |
| (GNMA/FNMA/FHLMC), (AMT), 5.20%, 6/1/39 | 901,381 |
345 | Louisiana Housing Finance Authority, SFMR, | |
| (GNMA/FNMA), 0.00%, 6/1/27 | 135,254 |
| | $ 2,788,353 |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 5.7% | |
$1,470 | St. John Baptist Parish (Marathon Oil Corp.), | |
| 5.125%, 6/1/37 | $ 1,380,257 |
1,000 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), | |
| (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | 895,500 |
| | $ 2,275,757 |
|
Insured-Education — 14.0% | |
$ 750 | Lafayette Public Trust Financing Authority, (Ragin Cajun | |
| Facility, Inc.), (AGC), 6.00%, 10/1/38 | $ 782,175 |
340 | Lafayette Public Trust Financing Authority, (Ragin Cajun | |
| Facility, Inc.), (NPFG), 5.00%, 10/1/32 | 341,367 |
1,500 | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community | |
| Development Authority, (AMBAC), 4.50%, 10/1/37(1) | 1,271,310 |
500 | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community | |
Development Authority, (Louisiana State University Student |
| Housing), (NPFG), 4.75%, 8/1/28 | 462,340 |
1,140 | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Black & Gold | |
| Facilities), (CIFG), 4.50%, 7/1/38 | 831,311 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
Insured-Education (continued) | |
$1,000 | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (University of New | |
| Orleans), (NPFG), 4.75%, 3/1/32 | $ 955,290 |
850 | Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical | |
| College, (AGC), 5.50%, 1/1/34 | 900,430 |
| | $ 5,544,223 |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 5.8% | |
$ 625 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/35 | $ 624,087 |
2,000 | Rapides Finance Authority, (Cleco Power LLC), (AMBAC), | |
| 4.70%, 11/1/36 | 1,688,720 |
| | $ 2,312,807 |
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.5% | |
$1,250 | Jefferson Parish, Home Mortgage Authority, SFMR, (FGIC), | |
| Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 5/1/17(2) | $ 998,725 |
| | $ 998,725 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 2.8% | |
$1,500 | New Orleans, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 9/1/15 | $ 1,119,705 |
| | $ 1,119,705 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 1.9% | |
$ 750 | Terrebonne Parish, Hospital Service District No. 1, | |
| (Terrebonne General Medical Center), (AMBAC), | |
| 5.50%, 4/1/33 | $ 733,650 |
| | $ 733,650 |
|
Insured-Industrial Development Revenue — 2.7% |
$1,075 | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community | |
Development Authority, (BRCC Facility Corp.), (NPFG), |
| 5.00%, 12/1/32 | $ 1,076,021 |
| | $ 1,076,021 |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 1.9% | |
$ 500 | Calcasieu Parish Public Trust Authority Student Lease, | |
| (McNeese Student Housing), (NPFG), 5.25%, 5/1/33 | $ 483,060 |
300 | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community | |
| Development Authority, (Jefferson Parking Garage), | |
| (AMBAC), 5.00%, 9/1/31 | 285,570 |
| | $ 768,630 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
46 |
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipal Income Fund as o f F e br uar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 7.9% | |
$ 350 | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community | |
| Development Authority, (Capital and Equipment | |
| Acquisition), (AMBAC), 4.50%, 12/1/18 | $ 342,758 |
550 | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community | |
Development Authority, (Parking Facility Corp. Garage), |
| (AMBAC), 5.375%, 10/1/31 | 521,389 |
1,000 | Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & | |
Community Development Authority, (AMBAC), (BHAC), |
| 4.50%, 12/1/18 | 1,089,440 |
1,000 | Louisiana State Citizens Property Insurance Corp., (AGC), | |
| 6.75%, 6/1/26 | 1,170,930 |
| | $ 3,124,517 |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 6.1% | |
$1,000 | East Baton Rouge Parish, Sales Tax Revenue, (AGC), | |
| 5.25%, 8/1/28 | $ 1,079,420 |
1,000 | Louisiana Gas and Fuels Tax, (AGM), 5.00%, 5/1/36 | 1,023,130 |
1,525 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 88,008 |
1,030 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 127,277 |
560 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 64,344 |
445 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 47,833 |
| | $ 2,430,012 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 10.8% | |
$1,000 | Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & | |
| Community Development Authority, (AGM), (AMT), | |
| 5.75%, 1/1/28 | $ 1,039,970 |
1,205 | New Orleans Aviation Board, (AGM), (AMT), | |
| 5.00%, 1/1/38 | 1,144,208 |
1,500 | Port New Orleans Board of Commissioners, (AGC), | |
| 5.125%, 4/1/38 | 1,459,650 |
620 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), | |
| (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(3) | 637,403 |
| | $ 4,281,231 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 5.1% | |
$1,000 | Bossier City, Utilities Revenue, (BHAC), 5.50%, 10/1/38 | $ 1,064,000 |
975 | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community | |
| Development Authority, (Denham Springs), (AGC), | |
| 4.875%, 12/1/38 | 975,273 |
| | $ 2,039,273 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
Other Revenue — 7.0% | |
$6,995 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/50 | $ 260,564 |
3,015 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/55 | 57,526 |
1,000 | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community | |
| Development Authority, (Jefferson Parish), | |
| 5.375%, 4/1/31 | 1,050,960 |
1,500 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 5.875%, 5/15/39 | 1,394,445 |
| | $ 2,763,495 |
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.3% | |
$ 500 | Louisiana Housing Finance Authority, (Saint Dominic | |
| Assisted Care Facility), (GNMA), 6.85%, 9/1/25 | $ 500,760 |
| | $ 500,760 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 3.1% | |
$1,005 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | $ 997,824 |
60 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/39 | 54,103 |
175 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37 | 189,963 |
| | $ 1,241,890 |
|
Transportation — 1.7% | |
$ 675 | Louisiana Offshore Terminal Authority, Deepwater Port | |
| Revenue, (Loop LLC), 5.20%, 10/1/18 | $ 675,527 |
| | $ 675,527 |
|
Water and Sewer — 4.0% | |
$1,000 | East Baton Rouge, Sewer Commission, 5.25%, 2/1/39 | $ 1,043,410 |
500 | St. Tammany Parish, Utility Revenue, 5.50%, 8/1/35(4) | 520,935 |
| | $ 1,564,345 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.5% | |
(identified cost $39,522,270) | $39,479,468 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.5% | $ 198,794 |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $39,678,262 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
47 |
| | | |
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax
preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum
Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHLMC - Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA - Federal National Mortgage Association
GNMA - Government National Mortgage Association
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
SFMR - Single Family Mortgage Revenue
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Louisiana
municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to
meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments
in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk
associated with such economic developments, at February 28,
2010, 61.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of
various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance
agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual
financial institution ranged from 3.7% to 18.1% of total
investments.
(1) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities. |
(2) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
(3) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
(4) | When-issued security. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
48 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) | | | | |
| | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 98.9% | |
|
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Cogeneration — 1.2% | |
$ 1,250 | Maryland Energy Financing Administration, (AES Warrior | |
| Run), (AMT), 7.40%, 9/1/19 | $ 1,250,388 |
| | $ 1,250,388 |
|
Education — 10.3% | |
$ 4,000 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Johns Hopkins University), 5.00%, 7/1/32 | $ 4,061,840 |
2,250 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Loyola College), 4.75%, 10/1/33 | 2,259,787 |
1,500 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Loyola College), 5.125%, 10/1/45 | 1,519,935 |
1,500 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Maryland Institute College of Art), | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/36 | 1,388,475 |
400 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Washington Christian Academy), | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/38 | 192,004 |
1,000 | Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, | |
| (Our Lady of Good Counsel High School), | |
| 6.00%, 5/1/35 | 934,820 |
| | $ 10,356,861 |
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 5.8% | |
$ 1,160 | Baltimore County, Economic Development Revenue, | |
| (Revisions, Inc.), Prerefunded to 8/15/11, | |
| 8.50%, 8/15/25 | $ 1,305,638 |
1,125 | Baltimore, SFMR, (Inner Harbor), Escrowed to Maturity, | |
| 8.00%, 12/1/10 | 1,191,329 |
2,000 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Johns Hopkins Hospital), Prerefunded to | |
| 11/15/13, 5.125%, 11/15/34 | 2,294,520 |
500 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Maryland Institute College of Art), | |
| Prerefunded to 6/1/11, 5.50%, 6/1/21 | 531,575 |
425 | Westminster, Educational Facilities, (McDaniel College), | |
| Prerefunded to 10/1/12, 5.50%, 4/1/27 | 476,884 |
| | $ 5,799,946 |
|
General Obligations — 14.3% | |
$ 1,140 | Anne Arundel County, Water and Sewer Construction, | |
| 4.50%, 4/1/29 | $ 1,189,077 |
500 | Anne Arundel County, Water and Sewer Construction, | |
| 4.625%, 4/1/33 | 516,345 |
1,000 | Anne Arundel County, Water and Sewer Construction, | |
| 4.75%, 4/1/39 | 1,045,430 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
General Obligations (continued) | |
$ 2,000 | Baltimore County, (Metropolitan District), | |
| 5.00%, 2/1/31(1) | $ 2,159,400 |
2,000 | Maryland, 5.00%, 11/1/19 | 2,387,040 |
1,000 | Montgomery County, 5.00%, 5/1/23 | 1,125,400 |
1,500 | Montgomery County, 5.00%, 5/1/25 | 1,669,080 |
1,000 | Montgomery County, 5.25%, 10/1/19 | 1,049,030 |
2,235 | Prince George’s County Housing Authority, | |
| 5.00%, 7/15/23 | 2,499,892 |
1,100 | Puerto Rico, 0.00%, 7/1/16 | 813,274 |
| | $ 14,453,968 |
|
Hospital — 10.4% | |
$ 1,500 | Baltimore County, (Catholic Health Initiatives), | |
| 4.50%, 9/1/33 | $ 1,434,315 |
1,000 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
Authority, (Anne Arundel Health Care Services, Inc.), |
| 5.00%, 7/1/32 | 994,610 |
1,000 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Calvert Health System), 5.50%, 7/1/36 | 1,021,210 |
1,500 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (MedStar Health, Inc.), 5.25%, 5/15/46 | 1,502,085 |
2,330 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Peninsula Regional Medical Center), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/36 | 2,361,455 |
2,500 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (University of Maryland Medical System), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/41 | 2,441,800 |
750 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Washington County Hospital), | |
| 5.75%, 1/1/38 | 728,655 |
| | $ 10,484,130 |
|
Housing — 7.2% | |
$ 1,000 | Maryland Community Development Administration, | |
| (AMT), 5.10%, 9/1/37 | $ 1,004,090 |
1,170 | Maryland Community Development Administration, | |
Department of Housing and Community Development, |
| (AMT), 5.15%, 9/1/42(2) | 1,170,780 |
1,000 | Maryland Community Development Administration, | |
| MFMR, (AMT), 4.70%, 9/1/37 | 939,210 |
1,000 | Maryland Community Development Administration, | |
| MFMR, (AMT), 4.85%, 9/1/37 | 980,630 |
2,000 | Maryland Community Development Administration, | |
| MFMR, (AMT), 4.85%, 9/1/47 | 1,914,840 |
350 | Maryland Economic Development Corp., (Towson | |
| University), 5.00%, 7/1/39 | 301,073 |
1,000 | Prince George’s County Housing Authority, (Langely | |
| Gardens), (AMT), 5.875%, 2/20/39 | 974,200 |
| | $ 7,284,823 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
49 |
| | |
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 2.0% | |
$ 960 | Maryland Economic Development Corp., (AFCO Cargo), | |
| (AMT), 6.50%, 7/1/24 | $ 810,816 |
205 | Maryland Economic Development Corp., (AFCO Cargo), | |
| (AMT), 7.34%, 7/1/24 | 187,360 |
1,000 | Maryland Economic Development Corp., (Waste | |
| Management, Inc.), (AMT), 4.60%, 4/1/16 | 1,001,010 |
| | $ 1,999,186 |
|
Insured-Education — 1.4% | |
$ 1,200 | Morgan State University, Academic and Auxiliary | |
| Facilities, (NPFG), 6.10%, 7/1/20 | $ 1,416,996 |
| | $ 1,416,996 |
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 5.3% | |
$ 3,145 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
Authority, (Helix Health Issue), (AMBAC), Escrowed to |
| Maturity, 5.00%, 7/1/27 | $ 3,637,192 |
1,500 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (AGM), Prerefunded | |
| to 7/1/12, 5.125%, 7/1/26 | 1,671,810 |
| | $ 5,309,002 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 1.0% | |
$ 1,000 | Puerto Rico, (NPFG), 5.50%, 7/1/29 | $ 1,025,170 |
| | $ 1,025,170 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 8.1% | |
$ 2,010 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Lifebridge Health), (AGC), 4.75%, 7/1/42 | $ 1,986,945 |
3,035 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Medlantic/Helix Issue), (AMBAC), | |
| 5.25%, 8/15/38 | 3,039,401 |
3,150 | Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & | |
Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, (Auxilio |
| Mutuo Obligated Group), (NPFG), 6.25%, 7/1/24 | 3,152,993 |
| | $ 8,179,339 |
|
Insured-Housing — 1.2% | |
$ 1,530 | Maryland Economic Development Corp., (University of | |
| Maryland), (CIFG), 4.50%, 6/1/35 | $ 1,234,970 |
| | $ 1,234,970 |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 1.4% | |
$ 550 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/28 | $ 166,353 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue (continued) | |
$ 1,325 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/29 | $ 370,510 |
2,000 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/34 | 367,060 |
300 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/37 | 44,187 |
2,000 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/30 | 515,840 |
| | $ 1,463,950 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 10.4% | |
$ 1,000 | Maryland Transportation Authority, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/28 | $ 1,051,510 |
1,500 | Maryland Transportation Authority, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/36 | 1,585,305 |
1,000 | Maryland Transportation Authority, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/38 | 1,053,980 |
2,000 | Maryland Transportation Authority, (AGM), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/41(2) | 2,100,790 |
1,500 | Maryland Transportation Authority, Baltimore-Washington | |
| International Airport, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 3/1/27 | 1,531,470 |
1,500 | Maryland Transportation Authority, Baltimore-Washington | |
| International Airport, (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.25%, 3/1/27 | 1,488,330 |
1,705 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, | |
| (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/32 | 1,656,834 |
| | $ 10,468,219 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 5.2% | |
$ 500 | Baltimore, (Water Projects), (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.125%, 7/1/42 | $ 504,310 |
1,250 | Baltimore, Wastewater, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/32 | 1,286,300 |
1,000 | Baltimore, Wastewater, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/22 | 1,081,120 |
2,000 | Baltimore, Wastewater, (NPFG), 5.65%, 7/1/20 | 2,342,800 |
| | $ 5,214,530 |
|
Other Revenue — 2.7% | |
$15,520 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/50 | $ 578,120 |
10,110 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/55 | 192,899 |
895 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Board of Child Care), 5.375%, 7/1/32 | 902,482 |
1,000 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Board of Child Care), 5.625%, 7/1/22 | 1,027,870 |
| | $ 2,701,371 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
50 |
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipal Income Fund as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.5% | |
$ 375 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Edenwald), 5.40%, 1/1/37 | $ 325,451 |
590 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (King Farm Presbyterian Community), | |
| 5.00%, 1/1/17 | 543,809 |
750 | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | |
| Authority, (Mercy Ridge), 4.75%, 7/1/34 | 667,598 |
| | $ 1,536,858 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 5.8% | |
$ 747 | Baltimore (Clipper Mill), 6.25%, 9/1/33 | $ 699,939 |
500 | Baltimore (Strathdale Manor), 7.00%, 7/1/33 | 514,220 |
800 | Frederick County, Urbana Community Development | |
| Authority, 6.625%, 7/1/25 | 800,056 |
1,000 | Montgomery County, Department of Liquor Control, | |
| 5.00%, 4/1/21 | 1,132,040 |
250 | Montgomery County, Department of Liquor Control, | |
| 5.00%, 4/1/29 | 266,150 |
2,415 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | 2,397,757 |
| | $ 5,810,162 |
|
Transportation — 3.7% | |
$ 1,000 | Maryland State Department of Transportation, County | |
| Transportation, 5.00%, 2/15/23 | $ 1,125,950 |
2,500 | Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/32 | 2,623,575 |
| | $ 3,749,525 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 98.9% | |
(identified cost $99,027,979) | $ 99,739,394 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 1.1% | $ 1,071,939 |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $100,811,333 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc. FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company MFMR - Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp. SFMR - Single Family Mortgage Revenue
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Maryland municipalities. In addition, 12.8% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2010 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2010, 34.4% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.2% to 12.0% of total investments.
(1) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
(2) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
51 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) | | | | |
| | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 100. 0% | |
|
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Education — 5.0% | |
$2,000 | Curators University System Facilities Revenue, (University | |
| of Missouri), 5.00%, 11/1/33 | $ 2,076,040 |
1,275 | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Washington University), 5.375%, 3/15/39(1) | 1,388,705 |
1,500 | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Washington University), 5.375%, 3/15/39(2) | 1,633,770 |
| | $ 5,098,515 |
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.1% | |
$1,000 | Saint Louis County, Mortgage Revenue, (GNMA), (AMT), | |
| Escrowed to Maturity, 5.40%, 1/1/16 | $ 1,139,010 |
| | $ 1,139,010 |
|
General Obligations — 6.1% | |
$1,000 | Clay County, Public School District, 5.00%, 3/1/28 | $ 1,064,450 |
1,000 | Independence School District, (Direct Deposit Program), | |
| 5.00%, 3/1/29 | 1,079,700 |
1,000 | Jackson County, Reorganized School District No. 7, | |
| 5.00%, 3/1/28 | 1,082,590 |
1,000 | Kansas City, 4.75%, 2/1/25 | 1,081,140 |
750 | University City School District, (Direct Deposit Program), | |
| 5.00%, 2/15/26 | 815,947 |
3,000 | Wentzville School District No. R-4, 0.00%, 3/1/28 | 1,091,100 |
| | $ 6,214,927 |
|
Hospital — 7.4% | |
$1,000 | Cape Girardeau County Industrial Development Authority, | |
| (Southeast Missouri Hospital Association), | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/36 | $ 867,340 |
1,950 | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Barnes Jewish Christian Hospital), 5.25%, 5/15/14 | 2,145,254 |
1,000 | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Children’s Mercy Hospital), 5.625%, 5/15/39 | 1,016,810 |
740 | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Freeman Health Systems), 5.25%, 2/15/18 | 740,126 |
495 | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Lake of the Ozarks General Hospital), | |
| 6.50%, 2/15/21 | 495,361 |
250 | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Lake Regional Health System), 5.70%, 2/15/34 | 249,995 |
1,000 | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (SSM Healthcare), 5.00%, 6/1/36 | 1,025,100 |
1,225 | West Plains Industrial Development Authority, (Ozarks | |
| Medical Center), 5.65%, 11/15/22 | 1,065,162 |
| | $ 7,605,148 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Housing — 2.6% | |
$ 865 | Jefferson County Industrial Development Authority, | |
| MFMR, (Riverview Bend Apartments), (AMT), | |
| 6.75%, 11/1/29 | $ 794,122 |
505 | Missouri Housing Development Commission, (AMT), | |
| 5.05%, 1/1/24 | 510,383 |
250 | Missouri Housing Development Commission, SFMR, | |
| (GNMA), (AMT), 4.50%, 9/1/29 | 245,222 |
750 | Missouri Housing Development Commission, SFMR, | |
| (GNMA), (AMT), 4.70%, 3/1/35 | 749,775 |
240 | Missouri Housing Development Commission, SFMR, | |
| (GNMA), (AMT), 5.00%, 9/1/37 | 238,577 |
80 | Missouri Housing Development Commission, SFMR, | |
| (GNMA), (AMT), 6.45%, 9/1/27 | 80,094 |
| | $ 2,618,173 |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 3.2% | |
$1,080 | Missouri Development Finance Authority, Solid Waste | |
Disposal, (Procter & Gamble Paper Products), (AMT), |
| 5.20%, 3/15/29 | $ 1,114,376 |
2,000 | Saint Louis Industrial Development Authority, (Anheuser | |
| Busch Sewer and Solid Waste Disposal Facilities), | |
| (AMT), 4.875%, 3/1/32 | 1,865,700 |
300 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), | |
| (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | 268,650 |
| | $ 3,248,726 |
|
Insured-Education — 2.2% | |
$ 650 | Lincoln University Auxiliary System Revenue, (AGC), | |
| 5.125%, 6/1/37 | $ 659,198 |
1,500 | Missouri State University Auxiliary Enterprise System, | |
| (XLCA), 5.00%, 4/1/25 | 1,604,265 |
| | $ 2,263,463 |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 12.5% | |
$1,240 | Columbia Electric Utility Improvement Revenue, (AMBAC), | |
| 5.00%, 10/1/28 | $ 1,301,702 |
2,250 | Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy | |
Resources Authority, (Union Electric), (AMBAC), (AMT), |
| 5.45%, 10/1/28 | 2,236,883 |
1,015 | Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, | |
| (AMBAC), 4.50%, 1/1/36 | 977,394 |
2,465 | Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, | |
| (AMBAC), (BHAC), 4.50%, 1/1/37 | 2,442,100 |
390 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/30 | 397,823 |
455 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/34 | 454,345 |
1,375 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/29 | 1,405,195 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
52 |
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund as of F e br uar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities (continued) | |
$1,150 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/16 | $ 1,273,625 |
2,275 | Springfield, Public Utility, (BHAC), (FGIC), | |
| 4.50%, 8/1/36 | 2,281,871 |
| | $ 12,770,938 |
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 7.6% | |
$3,590 | Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Lester Cox Medical Center), (NPFG), Escrowed to | |
| Maturity, 0.00%, 9/1/20 | $ 2,311,134 |
205 | Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Lester Cox Medical Center), (NPFG), Escrowed to | |
| Maturity, 0.00%, 9/1/21 | 124,902 |
2,000 | Puerto Rico, (FGIC), Prerefunded to 7/1/12, | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/32 | 2,203,560 |
1,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), Prerefunded | |
| to 7/1/13, 5.00%, 7/1/32 | 1,132,220 |
750 | Saint Louis Airport, (Capital Improvement Program), | |
| (NPFG), Prerefunded to 7/1/12, 5.00%, 7/1/32 | 822,638 |
375 | Saint Louis, Board of Education, (NPFG), Prerefunded to | |
| 4/1/16, 5.00%, 4/1/25 | 439,384 |
625 | Saint Louis, Board of Education, (NPFG), Prerefunded to | |
| 4/1/16, 5.00%, 4/1/25 | 732,306 |
| | $ 7,766,144 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 7.2% | |
$1,200 | Jackson County, Consolidated School District No. 002 | |
| (Missouri Direct Deposit), (NPFG), 5.00%, 3/1/27 | $ 1,265,544 |
1,000 | Kansas City, (NPFG), 5.00%, 2/1/27 | 1,084,210 |
1,000 | Platte County Reorganized School District No. R-3, | |
| (AGM), 5.00%, 3/1/25 | 1,075,690 |
1,900 | Saint Charles County, Francis Howell School District, | |
| (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 3/1/16 | 1,600,959 |
1,000 | Saint Charles County, Francis Howell School District, | |
| (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.25%, 3/1/21 | 1,208,660 |
1,000 | Springfield, School District No. R-12, (AGM), | |
| 5.25%, 3/1/25 | 1,103,680 |
| | $ 7,338,743 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 5.4% | |
$5,910 | Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Lester Cox Medical Center), (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/20 | $ 3,785,178 |
335 | Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Lester Cox Medical Center), (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/21 | 194,615 |
1,500 | North Kansas City, (North Kansas City Memorial | |
| Hospital), (AGM), 5.125%, 11/15/33 | 1,513,260 |
| | $ 5,493,053 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Industrial Development Revenue — 1.9% |
$2,000 | Kansas City Industrial Development Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 4.50%, 12/1/32 | $ 1,930,760 |
| | $ 1,930,760 |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 9.3% | |
$1,000 | Cape Girardeau County, Building Corp., (Jackson R-II | |
| School District), (NPFG), 5.25%, 3/1/25 | $ 1,061,830 |
1,000 | Cape Girardeau County, Building Corp., (Jackson R-II | |
| School District), (NPFG), 5.25%, 3/1/26 | 1,056,370 |
1,710 | Jackson County, (Harry S. Truman Sports Complex), | |
| (AMBAC), 4.50%, 12/1/31 | 1,684,213 |
1,000 | Jackson County, Leasehold Revenue, (Truman Sports), | |
| (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/20 | 581,170 |
1,000 | Jackson County, Leasehold Revenue, (Truman Sports), | |
| (NPFG), 5.00%, 12/1/27 | 1,025,330 |
2,270 | Kansas City, Leasehold Revenue, (Municipal Assistance), | |
| (AMBAC), 0.00%, 4/15/26 | 952,969 |
2,105 | Kansas City, Leasehold Revenue, (Municipal Assistance), | |
| (AMBAC), 0.00%, 4/15/30 | 674,716 |
145 | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (CIFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/36 | 139,004 |
1,000 | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to | |
| Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | 1,210,210 |
1,990 | Saint Louis Industrial Development Authority, (Convention | |
| Center Hotel), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/15/19 | 1,110,738 |
| | $ 9,496,550 |
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 0.8% | |
$ 750 | Missouri Development Finance Authority, Cultural Facility, | |
| (Nelson Gallery Foundation), (NPFG), 5.25%, 12/1/22 | $ 793,020 |
| | $ 793,020 |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 4.8% | |
$2,350 | Bi-State Development Agency, Missouri and Illinois | |
| Metropolitan District, (Saint Clair County Metrolink), | |
| (AGM), 5.25%, 7/1/28 | $ 2,556,095 |
600 | Kansas City, (Blue Parkway Town Center), (NPFG), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/27 | 566,052 |
1,000 | Kansas City, Special Obligations, (AGC), | |
| 5.00%, 3/1/28 | 1,055,350 |
4,000 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/34 | 734,120 |
| | $ 4,911,617 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
53 |
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund as of F e br uar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Transportation — 5.0% | |
$2,060 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), | |
| (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | $ 2,117,824 |
900 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, | |
| (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/29 | 922,653 |
910 | Saint Louis Airport, (Lambert International Airport), | |
| (FGIC), (NPFG), (AMT), 6.00%, 7/1/14 | 1,021,475 |
1,000 | Saint Louis Airport, (Lambert International Airport), | |
| (NPFG), 5.50%, 7/1/31 | 996,190 |
| | $ 5,058,142 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 0.8% | |
$1,000 | Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy | |
Resources Authority, (Missouri - American Water Co.), |
| (AMBAC), (AMT), 4.60%, 12/1/36 | $ 815,680 |
| | $ 815,680 |
|
Other Revenue — 2.5% | |
$2,500 | Missouri Development Finance Board Cultural Facilities | |
| Revenue, (Kauffman Center), 4.75%, 6/1/37 | $ 2,519,700 |
| | $ 2,519,700 |
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 3.6% | |
$1,000 | Lees Summit Industrial Development Authority, Health | |
| Facility, (John Knox Village), 5.125%, 8/15/32 | $ 865,130 |
2,000 | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | |
| (Lutheran Senior Services), 5.125%, 2/1/27 | 1,859,640 |
1,000 | St. Louis County Industrial Development Authority, | |
| Series A, (Friendship Village West County), | |
| 5.50%, 9/1/28 | 936,070 |
| | $ 3,660,840 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 3.8% | |
$ 270 | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.625%, 12/1/29 | $ 274,128 |
295 | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.75%, 12/1/34 | 299,596 |
600 | Kansas City, Tax Increment Revenue, (Maincor Projects), | |
| Series A, 5.25%, 3/1/18 | 588,096 |
7,500 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0.00%, 8/1/56 | 380,325 |
2,395 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | 2,377,900 |
| | $ 3,920,045 |
|
Transportation — 3.7% | |
$ 270 | Branson, Regional Airport Transportation Development | |
| District, (Branson Airport, LLC), (AMT), 6.00%, 7/1/25 | $ 195,286 |
350 | Branson, Regional Airport Transportation Development | |
| District, (Branson Airport, LLC), (AMT), 6.00%, 7/1/37 | 229,036 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Transportation (continued) | |
$2,000 | Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, | |
| 5.00%, 5/1/19 | $ 2,254,340 |
1,000 | Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, | |
| 5.00%, 5/1/26 | 1,087,010 |
| | $ 3,765,672 |
|
Water and Sewer — 3.5% | |
$1,200 | Kansas City, Sanitation Sewer System Revenue, | |
| 5.25%, 1/1/34 | $ 1,260,540 |
800 | Kansas City, Water Revenue, 5.25%, 12/1/32 | 841,816 |
495 | Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy | |
| Resources Authority, (Revolving Fund Program), | |
| 7.20%, 7/1/16 | 520,166 |
1,000 | Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy | |
Resources Authority, (Revolving Fund Program), Water |
| Pollution Control, 0.00%, 1/1/14 | 936,590 |
| | $ 3,559,112 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 100.0% | |
(identified cost $99,637,736) | $101,987,978 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.00% | $ 48,267 |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $102,036,245 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp. CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc. FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company GNMA - Government National Mortgage Association MFMR - Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp. SFMR - Single Family Mortgage Revenue XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Missouri municipalities. In addition, 14.5% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2010 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2010, 57.5% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
54 |
| | | |
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The
aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution
ranged from 1.6% to 24.3% of total investments.
(1) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
(2) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
55 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) | | | | |
| | | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — | 108. 4% | |
|
Principal Amount | | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Education — 10.0% | | |
$ 5,000 | North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Duke | |
| University), 5.00%, 10/1/38(1) | $ 5,243,750 |
3,500 | North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Wake | |
| Forest University), 5.00%, 1/1/38 | | 3,679,830 |
1,050 | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/17 | | 850,500 |
1,980 | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/21 | | 1,300,424 |
| | $ 11,074,504 |
|
Electric Utilities — 6.0% | | |
$ 1,500 | North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, | |
| 5.00%, 1/1/26 | $ 1,556,370 |
2,000 | North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, | |
| 6.75%, 1/1/24 | | 2,357,280 |
1,000 | North Carolina Municipal Power Agency, (Catawba), | |
| 5.00%, 1/1/30 | | 1,024,360 |
625 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.50%, 7/1/38 | 632,875 |
1,000 | Wake County Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control | |
| Financing Authority, (Carolina Power and Light Co.), | |
| 5.375%, 2/1/17 | | 1,067,110 |
| | $ 6,637,995 |
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.7% | |
$ 1,950 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Escrowed to various | |
| sinking fund dates through 7/1/17, Series N, | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/17 | $ 1,493,524 |
2,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Escrowed to various | |
| sinking fund dates through 7/1/17, Series O, | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/17 | | 1,529,600 |
| | $ 3,023,124 |
|
General Obligations — 1.9% | | |
$ 1,000 | Charlotte, 5.00%, 7/1/29 | $ 1,040,690 |
1,000 | Wake County, 5.00%, 6/1/36 | | 1,053,350 |
| | $ 2,094,040 |
|
Hospital — 16.6% | | |
$ 4,980 | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, | |
| 5.00%, 1/15/47(1) | $ 5,002,310 |
2,000 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Duke | |
| University Health System), 5.00%, 6/1/42 | 2,020,540 |
2,000 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Mission Health | |
| System), 5.00%, 10/1/25 | | 2,104,400 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Hospital (continued) | |
$ 1,350 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Mission Health | |
| System), 5.00%, 10/1/36 | $ 1,372,113 |
3,600 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (North Carolina | |
| Baptist Hospital), 5.25%, 6/1/29(2) | 3,753,564 |
1,000 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Southeastern | |
| Regional Medical Center), 5.375%, 6/1/32 | 970,240 |
500 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Union | |
| Regional Medical Center), 5.375%, 1/1/32 | 500,005 |
2,500 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (University | |
| Health System), 6.25%, 12/1/33 | 2,762,275 |
| | $ 18,485,447 |
|
Housing — 7.1% | |
$ 1,430 | Charlotte Housing Authority, (South Oaks Crossing | |
| Apartments), (AMT), 4.60%, 8/20/26(3) | $ 1,404,060 |
2,410 | North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), | |
| 4.80%, 1/1/37 | 2,294,609 |
1,990 | North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), | |
| 4.80%, 1/1/39 | 1,896,729 |
995 | North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), | |
| 4.85%, 7/1/38 | 950,683 |
985 | North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), | |
| 4.90%, 7/1/37 | 951,825 |
420 | North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, MFMR, (AMT), | |
| 6.45%, 9/1/27 | 420,491 |
| | $ 7,918,397 |
|
Insured-Education — 2.3% | |
$ 1,320 | North Carolina Educational Facilities Finance Agency, | |
| (Johnson & Wales University), (XLCA), 5.00%, 4/1/33 | $ 1,156,082 |
350 | University of North Carolina at Greensboro, (AGC), | |
| 5.00%, 4/1/34 | 361,876 |
1,000 | University of North Carolina at Wilmington, (AGC), | |
| 5.00%, 10/1/33 | 1,036,720 |
| | $ 2,554,678 |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 3.1% | |
$ 1,000 | North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, (AGC), | |
| 6.00%, 1/1/19 | $ 1,128,180 |
1,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/34 | 998,560 |
1,340 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/35 | 1,338,044 |
| | $ 3,464,784 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
56 |
| | | |
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 0.8% | |
$ 840 | Puerto Rico, (NPFG), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | $ 887,452 |
| | $ 887,452 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 10.1% | |
$ 1,675 | Johnston Memorial Hospital, (AGM), Variable Rate, | |
| 24.948%, 10/1/36(4)(5)(6) | $ 1,816,403 |
375 | Nash Health Care System, (AGM), 5.00%, 11/1/30 | 372,109 |
1,000 | New Hanover County, Hospital Revenue, (New Hanover | |
| Regional Medical Center), (AGM), 5.125%, 10/1/31 | 1,025,490 |
1,045 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Betsy | |
| Johnson), (AGM), 5.375%, 10/1/24 | 1,074,312 |
1,450 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Cleveland | |
| County Healthcare), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/35 | 1,345,789 |
1,000 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Wakemed), | |
| (AGC), 5.625%, 10/1/38 | 1,029,470 |
2,090 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Wakemed), | |
| (AGC), 5.875%, 10/1/38 | 2,174,603 |
1,500 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Wilson | |
| Memorial Hospital), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 11/1/15 | 1,195,665 |
1,175 | Onslow County Hospital Authority, (Onslow Memorial | |
| Hospital), (NPFG), 5.00%, 4/1/26 | 1,204,798 |
| | $ 11,238,639 |
|
Insured-Housing — 0.4% | |
$ 475 | University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Certificates of | |
| Participation, (Student Housing Project), (AGC), | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/32 | $ 489,221 |
| | $ 489,221 |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 5.7% | |
$ 1,000 | City of Monroe, Certificates of Participation, (AGC), | |
| 5.50%, 3/1/39 | $ 1,041,810 |
2,500 | County of Rockingham, (AGC), 5.00%, 4/1/32 | 2,582,225 |
1,500 | Franklin County, Certificates of Participation, (NPFG), | |
| 5.00%, 9/1/27 | 1,564,845 |
1,000 | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to | |
| Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | 1,210,210 |
| | $ 6,399,090 |
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 1.9% | |
$ 2,000 | Monroe, Combined Enterprise System Revenue, (AGC), | |
| 5.00%, 3/1/33(3) | $ 2,058,500 |
| | $ 2,058,500 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 2.8% | |
$ 550 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/27 | $ 553,019 |
12,440 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 717,912 |
12,000 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/43 | 1,591,080 |
450 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 55,607 |
895 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 102,836 |
720 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 77,393 |
| | $ 3,097,847 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 6.8% | |
$ 500 | Charlotte, Airport, (NPFG), (AMT), 5.25%, 7/1/21 | $ 510,175 |
10,000 | North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway | |
| System), (AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/35 | 2,409,800 |
1,000 | North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway | |
| System), (AGC), 5.375%, 1/1/26 | 1,079,890 |
1,800 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), | |
| (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | 1,850,526 |
1,800 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, | |
| (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/32 | 1,749,150 |
| | $ 7,599,541 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 2.3% | |
$ 555 | Broad River Water Authority, Water System, (XLCA), | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/21(4) | $ 564,613 |
500 | Brunswick County, Enterprise System Water and Sewer | |
| Revenue, (AGM), 5.25%, 4/1/26 | 525,505 |
1,500 | Kannapolis, Water and Sewer, (AGM), (AMT), | |
| 5.25%, 2/1/26(3) | 1,513,305 |
| | $ 2,603,423 |
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 9.6% |
$ 1,550 | Cabarrus County, Certificates of Participation, | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/29 | $ 1,607,226 |
1,400 | Cabarrus County, Certificates of Participation, | |
| 5.25%, 6/1/28 | 1,490,580 |
700 | Charlotte, (Government Facilities), 5.00%, 6/1/28 | 724,969 |
1,500 | Charlotte, (Government Facilities), 5.00%, 6/1/33(3) | 1,535,925 |
1,000 | Durham County, Certificates of Participation, | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/31 | 1,041,320 |
1,000 | Forsyth County, 5.00%, 4/1/30 | 1,073,340 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
57 |
| | | |
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation (continued) | |
$ 2,000 | Raleigh, (Downtown Improvement Projects), | |
| 5.00%, 2/1/27 | $ 2,124,940 |
1,050 | Wilmington, Certificates of Participation, | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/38 | 1,078,528 |
| | $ 10,676,828 |
|
Other Revenue — 3.5% | |
$13,560 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/50 | $ 505,110 |
1,000 | Durham County Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control | |
| Financing Authority, (Research Triangle Institute), | |
| 5.00%, 2/1/24 | 1,143,660 |
1,035 | Durham County Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control | |
| Financing Authority, (Research Triangle Institute), | |
| 5.00%, 2/1/25 | 1,176,516 |
1,000 | North Carolina, Capital Improvement Limited Obligation, | |
| 5.00%, 5/1/27 | 1,104,050 |
| | $ 3,929,336 |
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.6% | |
$ 1,900 | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (United | |
| Methodist), 5.50%, 10/1/32 | $ 1,752,332 |
| | $ 1,752,332 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 2.4% | |
$ 8,510 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0.00%, 8/1/56 | $ 431,542 |
1,620 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | 1,608,433 |
545 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, | |
| 6.75%, 10/1/37 | 591,598 |
| | $ 2,631,573 |
|
Transportation — 2.3% | |
$ 500 | Charlotte, Airport, 5.50%, 7/1/34 | $ 529,920 |
1,000 | Charlotte, Airport, (AMT), 5.375%, 7/1/28 | 1,012,200 |
1,000 | North Carolina Ports Authority, 5.25%, 2/1/40(2) | 1,006,040 |
| | $ 2,548,160 |
|
Water and Sewer — 8.5% | |
$ 2,000 | Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Water and Sewer | |
| System, 5.00%, 8/1/35 | $ 2,101,680 |
2,000 | Cary, Combined Enterprise System Revenue, | |
| 5.00%, 12/1/33 | 2,111,040 |
2,000 | Charlotte, Water and Sewer, 5.00%, 7/1/38 | 2,144,340 |
1,975 | Charlotte, Water and Sewer, 5.125%, 6/1/26 | 2,054,395 |
| |
Principal Amount | |
(000’s omitted) Security | Value |
Water and Sewer (continued) | |
$ 1,000 Winston-Salem, Water and Sewer System, | |
5.00%, 6/1/34 | $ 1,062,780 |
| $ 9,474,235 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 108.4% | |
(identified cost $115,981,361) | $120,639,146 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (8.4)% | $ (9,339,665) |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $111,299,481 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax. CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company MFMR - Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp. XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by North Carolina municipalities. In addition, 15.6% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2010 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2010, 33.5% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.4% to 14.3% of total investments.
(1) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
(2) | When-issued security. |
(3) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities. |
(4) | Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in certain transactions and remain exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At February 28, 2010, the aggregate value of these securities is $2,381,016 or 2.1% of the Fund’s net assets. |
(5) | Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at February 28, 2010. |
(6) | Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $5,025,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the inverse floater. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
58 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) | | | | |
| | | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 103. 8% | |
|
Principal Amount | | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Cogeneration — 0.4% | | |
$ 660 | Western Generation Agency, (Wauna Cogeneration), | | |
| (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/12 | $ 663,274 |
| | $ 663,274 |
|
Education — 4.0% | | |
$ 3,000 | City of Forest Grove, (Pacific University), | | |
| 6.375%, 5/1/39 | $ 3,077,430 |
2,000 | Oregon Health and Science University, 5.75%, 7/1/39 | 2,112,300 |
1,000 | Oregon State Facilities Authority, (Linfield College), | | |
| 5.00%, 10/1/25 | | 1,007,230 |
| | $ 6,196,960 |
|
Electric Utilities — 1.1% | | |
$ 1,000 | Northern Wasco County, (Bonneville Power | | |
| Administration), 5.20%, 12/1/24 | $ 1,031,920 |
625 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.50%, 7/1/38 | 632,875 |
| | $ 1,664,795 |
|
General Obligations — 27.6% | | |
$ 3,490 | Clackamas and Washington Counties, School District | |
| No. 3JT, 5.00%, 6/15/33 | $ 3,701,599 |
12,870 | Clackamas County, Oregon Trail School District No. 46, | |
| 0.00%, 6/15/39 | | 2,835,004 |
2,230 | Clackamas County School District No. 46, | | |
| 0.00%, 6/15/32 | | 733,224 |
2,000 | Clackamas County School District No. 46, | | |
| 0.00%, 6/15/33 | | 621,360 |
2,865 | Deschutes and Jefferson Counties, School District No. 2J, | |
| 0.00%, 6/15/25 | | 1,428,489 |
3,730 | Deschutes and Jefferson Counties, School District No. 2J, | |
| 0.00%, 6/15/26 | | 1,748,997 |
4,175 | Deschutes and Jefferson Counties, School District No. 2J, | |
| 0.00%, 6/15/27 | | 1,843,680 |
3,970 | Deschutes and Jefferson Counties, School District No. 2J, | |
| 0.00%, 6/15/31 | | 1,380,687 |
8,000 | Jackson County, School District No. 549C, | | |
| 5.00%, 6/15/33(1) | | 8,324,680 |
2,315 | Keizer, (Keizer Station Area A Improvement District), | |
| 5.20%, 6/1/31 | | 2,385,353 |
1,000 | Multnomah and Clackamas Counties, Riverdale School | |
| District No. 51JT, 0.00%, 6/15/29 | | 397,270 |
1,215 | Multnomah and Clackamas Counties, Riverdale School | |
| District No. 51JT, 0.00%, 6/15/30 | | 451,117 |
1,365 | Multnomah and Clackamas Counties, Riverdale School | |
| District No. 51JT, 0.00%, 6/15/34 | | 389,243 |
| | | |
Principal Amount | | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
General Obligations (continued) | | |
$ 4,425 | Oregon Elderly and Disabled Housing, (AMT), | | |
| 5.65%, 8/1/26 | $ 4,427,124 |
660 | Oregon Veterans Welfare, Series 81, 5.25%, 10/1/42 | 663,775 |
1,010 | Oregon Veterans Welfare, Series 82, 5.50%, 12/1/42 | 1,020,544 |
1,575 | Polk, Marion and Benton Counties, School District | |
| No. 13J, 0.00%, 6/15/31 | | 545,580 |
5,820 | Polk, Marion and Benton Counties, School District | |
| No. 13J, 0.00%, 6/15/33 | | 1,790,581 |
3,350 | Polk, Marion and Benton Counties, School District | |
| No. 13J, 0.00%, 6/15/38 | | 771,070 |
2,120 | Polk, Marion and Benton Counties, School District | |
| No. 13J, 0.00%, 12/15/38 | | 475,601 |
1,000 | Redmond, 5.00%, 6/1/39 | | 970,020 |
12,660 | Salem-Keizer, School District No. 24J, 0.00%, 6/15/30 | 4,842,323 |
1,000 | Umatilla County, Hermiston School District No. 8R, | |
| 0.00%, 6/15/24 | | 543,560 |
| | $ 42,290,881 |
|
Hospital — 7.0% | | |
$ 2,000 | Deschutes County Hospital Facilities Authority, (Cascade | |
| Healthcare Community), 8.25%, 1/1/38 | $ 2,354,880 |
2,105 | Hood River County Health Facilities Authority, Elderly | |
| Housing, (Down Manor), 6.50%, 1/1/17 | | 2,109,505 |
2,500 | Multnomah County Hospital Facilities Authority, (Adventist | |
| Health System), 5.125%, 9/1/40 | | 2,463,925 |
3,735 | Oregon State Facilities Authority, (Legacy Health | |
| System), 5.00%, 3/15/30 | | 3,773,134 |
| | $ 10,701,444 |
|
Housing — 13.0% | | |
$ 830 | Oregon Health Authority, (Trillium Affordable Housing), | |
| (AMT), 6.75%, 2/15/29 | $ 754,578 |
2,960 | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, | |
| (AMT), 4.85%, 7/1/37 | | 2,826,119 |
3,300 | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, | |
| (AMT), 5.40%, 7/1/27 | | 3,408,372 |
750 | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, | |
| MFMR, (AMT), 5.70%, 7/1/29 | | 750,382 |
1,695 | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, | |
| MFMR, (FHA), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/47 | | 1,652,913 |
1,750 | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, | |
| SFMR, (AMT), 4.75%, 7/1/36 | | 1,648,360 |
1,815 | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, | |
| SFMR, (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/25 | | 1,836,526 |
600 | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, | |
| SFMR, (AMT), 6.20%, 7/1/27 | | 600,588 |
345 | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, | |
| SFMR, (AMT), 6.40%, 7/1/26 | | 345,404 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
59 |
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipal Income Fund as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Housing (continued) | |
$ 350 | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, | |
| SFMR, (AMT), 6.45%, 7/1/26 | $ 350,424 |
1,325 | Portland Housing Authority, (Pearl Court LP), (AMT), | |
| 4.50%, 1/1/22 | 1,315,314 |
1,280 | Portland Housing Authority, (Pearl Court LP), (AMT), | |
| 4.625%, 1/1/27 | 1,262,976 |
465 | Portland Housing Authority, (Yards Union Station Project), | |
| (AMT), 4.75%, 5/1/22 | 466,372 |
2,740 | Portland Housing Authority, (Yards Union Station Project), | |
| (AMT), 4.85%, 5/1/29 | 2,666,431 |
| | $ 19,884,759 |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 1.3% | |
$ 735 | Oregon Economic Development Authority, (Georgia- | |
| Pacific), (AMT), 5.70%, 12/1/25 | $ 668,688 |
830 | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), | |
| (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 | 613,046 |
915 | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), | |
| (AMT), 6.30%, 6/1/23 | 701,165 |
| | $ 1,982,899 |
|
Insured-Education — 1.7% | |
$ 4,850 | Oregon Health Science University, (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/21 | $ 2,614,586 |
| | $ 2,614,586 |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 3.8% | |
$ 1,715 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/30 | $ 1,749,403 |
2,760 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/34 | 2,756,025 |
1,270 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/35 | 1,268,146 |
| | $ 5,773,574 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 8.9% | |
$ 715 | Beaverton, School District, (AGC), 5.125%, 6/1/36 | $ 762,283 |
2,700 | Deschutes and Jefferson Counties, School District No. 2J, | |
| (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 6/15/23 | 1,509,543 |
3,750 | Lane County, School District No. 019, (Springfield), | |
| (AGM), 0.00%, 6/15/28 | 1,477,012 |
575 | Lane County, School District No. 019, (Springfield), | |
| (AGM), 0.00%, 6/15/29 | 213,705 |
600 | Linn County, Community School District No. 9, | |
| (Lebanon), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.50%, 6/15/27 | 719,946 |
4,000 | Linn County, Community School District No. 9, | |
| (Lebanon), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.50%, 6/15/30 | 4,693,320 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-General Obligations (continued) | |
$ 1,000 | Newport, (AGC), 0.00%, 6/1/28 | $ 414,540 |
1,225 | Newport, (AGC), 0.00%, 6/1/29 | 475,790 |
3,425 | Washington, Clackamas and Yamhill Counties, School | |
| District No. 88J, (NPFG), 0.00%, 6/15/31 | 1,117,098 |
5,000 | Washington, Multnomah and Yamhill Counties, School | |
| District No. 1J, (NPFG), 0.00%, 6/15/26 | 2,250,900 |
| | $ 13,634,137 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 3.1% | |
$ 1,415 | Deschutes County Hospital Facilities Authority, (Cascade | |
| Healthcare Community), (AMBAC), 5.375%, 1/1/35 | $ 1,456,403 |
3,000 | Medford Hospital Facilities Authority, (Asante Health | |
| System), (AGM), 5.50%, 8/15/28 | 3,224,880 |
| | $ 4,681,283 |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 4.8% | |
$ 560 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/28 | $ 169,378 |
450 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/37 | 66,281 |
12,100 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/44 | 1,086,459 |
1,015 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/27 | 1,020,572 |
20,000 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/42 | 2,072,800 |
42,840 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/54 | 2,472,296 |
905 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 111,831 |
1,795 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 206,245 |
1,435 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 154,248 |
| | $ 7,360,110 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 3.9% | |
$ 315 | Jackson County, Airport, (XLCA), 5.25%, 12/1/32 | $ 302,447 |
1,685 | Jackson County, Airport, (XLCA), 5.25%, 12/1/37 | 1,599,992 |
2,160 | Jackson County, Airport, (XLCA), (AMT), | |
| 5.25%, 12/1/23 | 2,247,912 |
1,800 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), | |
| (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | 1,850,526 |
| | $ 6,000,877 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
60 |
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipal Income Fund as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
Insured-Water and Sewer — 0.7% | |
$ 995 | Portland, Water System, (NPFG), 4.50%, 10/1/31 | $ 1,002,134 |
| | $ 1,002,134 |
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 0.6% |
$ 820 | Oregon State Department of Administration Services, | |
| 5.125%, 5/1/33 | $ 855,006 |
| | $ 855,006 |
|
Other Revenue — 2.7% | |
$20,255 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/50 | $ 754,499 |
3,130 | Oregon State Department of Administrative Services, | |
| 5.00%, 4/1/29 | 3,382,716 |
| | $ 4,137,215 |
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.1% | |
$ 1,750 | Clackamas County, Hospital Facility Authority, | |
| (Homewoods), 5.15%, 10/20/37 | $ 1,755,058 |
| | $ 1,755,058 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 7.3% | |
$ 3,190 | Oregon Department of Transportation, (Highway User | |
| Tax), 4.50%, 11/15/32 | $ 3,207,992 |
2,185 | Portland Limited Tax General Obligation, | |
| 0.00%, 6/1/22 | 1,359,288 |
12,970 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0.00%, 8/1/56 | 657,709 |
5,235 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | 5,197,622 |
755 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, | |
| 6.75%, 10/1/37 | 819,552 |
| | $ 11,242,163 |
|
Transportation — 3.6% | |
$ 4,000 | Port of Portland Airport Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/29 | $ 4,185,840 |
215 | Redmond Airport Revenue, 5.50%, 6/1/24 | 217,468 |
200 | Redmond Airport Revenue, 5.75%, 6/1/27 | 201,694 |
550 | Redmond Airport Revenue, 6.00%, 6/1/34 | 551,876 |
400 | Redmond Airport Revenue, 6.25%, 6/1/39 | 406,300 |
| | $ 5,563,178 |
|
Water and Sewer — 7.2% | |
$ 2,805 | Eugene, 4.50%, 8/1/31 | $ 2,831,395 |
2,285 | Portland, Sewer System, 4.75%, 6/15/29 | 2,377,885 |
1,885 | Portland, Sewer System, 4.75%, 6/15/30 | 1,948,242 |
| |
Principal Amount | |
(000’s omitted) Security | Value |
Water and Sewer (continued) | |
$ 3,760 Washington County, Clean Water Services, | |
4.75%, 10/1/27 | $ 3,930,892 |
| $ 11,088,414 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 103.8% | |
(identified cost $157,924,096) | $159,092,747 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (3.8)% | $ (5,876,733) |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $153,216,014 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc. FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company FHA - Federal Housing Administration MFMR - Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp. SFMR - Single Family Mortgage Revenue XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Oregon municipalities. In addition, 15.4% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2010 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2010, 25.8% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.2% to 12.7% of total investments.
(1) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
61 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) | | | | |
| | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 100. 4% | |
|
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Education — 5.3% | |
$ 1,640 | Lexington One School Facilities Corp., 5.00%, 12/1/30 | $ 1,662,419 |
890 | South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, (Furman | |
| University), 4.625%, 10/1/35 | 880,085 |
1,470 | South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, (Furman | |
| University), 5.00%, 10/1/38 | 1,480,599 |
1,225 | South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, (Wofford | |
| College), 5.00%, 4/1/36 | 1,228,565 |
3,505 | South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, (Wofford | |
| College), 5.25%, 4/1/32 | 3,620,034 |
| | $ 8,871,702 |
|
Electric Utilities — 6.7% | |
$ 550 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/37 | $ 525,514 |
2,000 | South Carolina Public Service Authority, 5.25%, 1/1/39 | 2,121,100 |
4,510 | South Carolina Public Service Authority, | |
| 5.375%, 1/1/28 | 4,994,600 |
3,435 | South Carolina Public Service Authority, 5.50%, 1/1/38 | 3,715,777 |
| | $ 11,356,991 |
|
General Obligations — 2.3% | |
$ 685 | Richland County, Sewer System, (Broad River), | |
| 5.125%, 3/1/29 | $ 709,763 |
2,360 | South Carolina, 3.25%, 8/1/30 | 2,085,697 |
1,240 | South Carolina, (Clemson University), 2.50%, 6/1/21 | 1,140,316 |
| | $ 3,935,776 |
|
Hospital — 9.5% | |
$ 5,260 | Greenwood County, 5.375%, 10/1/39 | $ 5,269,468 |
3,615 | Lexington County, (Health Services District, Inc.), | |
| 5.00%, 11/1/27 | 3,623,893 |
1,200 | Lexington County, (Health Services District, Inc.), | |
| 5.00%, 11/1/32 | 1,172,856 |
2,695 | South Carolina Jobs Economic Development Authority, | |
| (Health Services), 5.75%, 8/1/39 | 2,631,371 |
3,380 | South Carolina Jobs Economic Development Authority, | |
| (Kershaw County Medical Center Project), | |
| 6.00%, 9/15/38 | 3,357,016 |
| | $ 16,054,604 |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 1.9% | |
$ 400 | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), | |
| (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 | $ 295,444 |
1,500 | Richland County, (International Paper Co.), (AMT), | |
| 5.95%, 9/1/31 | 1,440,300 |
| | | |
Principal Amount | | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Industrial Development Revenue (continued) |
$ 1,400 | Richland County, (International Paper Co.), (AMT), | |
| 6.10%, | 4/1/23 | $ 1,415,540 |
| | | $ 3,151,284 |
|
Insured-Education — 2.0% | |
$ 1,615 | College of Charleston, Academic and Administrative | |
| Facilities, (XLCA), 4.50%, 4/1/37 | $ 1,525,545 |
475 | College of Charleston, Academic and Administrative | |
| Facilities, (XLCA), 5.375%, 4/1/25 | 493,616 |
1,400 | College of Charleston, Higher Education Facility, (XLCA), | |
| 4.50%, | 4/1/37 | 1,322,454 |
| | | $ 3,341,615 |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 10.6% | |
$ 800 | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (AGC), (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, | 1/1/28 | $ 303,768 |
8,235 | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (AGC), (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, | 1/1/29 | 2,940,142 |
12,610 | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (AGC), (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, | 1/1/32 | 3,717,302 |
7,815 | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, | 1/1/29 | 2,665,228 |
2,940 | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, | 1/1/32 | 827,110 |
2,090 | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, | 1/1/23 | 1,067,300 |
1,420 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, | 7/1/30 | 1,448,485 |
3,725 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, | 7/1/34 | 3,719,636 |
950 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, | 7/1/35 | 948,613 |
330 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, | 7/1/29 | 337,247 |
| | | $ 17,974,831 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 2.1% | |
$ 1,300 | Berkeley County, (AGM), 2.00%, 9/1/25 | $ 994,981 |
2,755 | Berkeley County, School District, (AGM), | |
| 2.75%, | 1/15/22 | 2,513,552 |
| | | $ 3,508,533 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 3.5% | |
$ 2,775 | Florence County, (Mcleod Regional Medical Center | |
| Project), (AGM), 5.25%, 11/1/27 | $ 2,852,589 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
62 |
| | |
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Hospital (continued) | |
$ 3,000 | South Carolina Jobs Economic Development Authority, | |
| (Anmed Health), (AGC), 5.50%, 2/1/38 | $ 3,113,430 |
| | $ 5,966,019 |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 6.5% | |
$ 75 | Berkeley County, School District, (CIFG), | |
| 4.75%, 12/1/31 | $ 72,912 |
1,450 | Kershaw County, Public Schools Foundation, (CIFG), | |
| 5.00%, 12/1/28 | 1,468,981 |
2,685 | Kershaw County, Public Schools Foundation, (CIFG), | |
| 5.00%, 12/1/31 | 2,689,377 |
4,650 | Scago Educational Facilities Corp., Pickens School District, | |
| (AGM), 4.50%, 12/1/28 | 4,580,203 |
2,280 | Sumter Two School Facility, Inc., Installment Purchase | |
| Revenue, (AGC), 4.50%, 12/1/32 | 2,241,582 |
| | $ 11,053,055 |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 0.5% | |
$ 4,890 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/54 | $ 282,202 |
905 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/44 | 111,831 |
1,795 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/45 | 206,245 |
1,435 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), | |
| 0.00%, 8/1/46 | 154,248 |
| | $ 754,526 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 7.6% | |
$ 2,700 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), | |
| (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | $ 2,775,789 |
1,095 | Richland-Lexington Airport District, (Columbia Metropolitan | |
| Airport), (CIFG), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/21 | 1,095,482 |
4,500 | South Carolina Ports Authority, (Ports Revenue), (AGM), | |
| 5.30%, 7/1/26 | 4,516,425 |
4,625 | South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure Bank | |
| Revenue, (AMBAC), (XLCA), 4.50%, 10/1/32 | 4,503,177 |
| | $ 12,890,873 |
|
Insured-Utilities — 5.7% | |
$ 1,000 | Greer, Combined Utility System, (AMBAC), | |
| 5.50%, 9/1/27 | $ 1,160,050 |
2,000 | Greer, Combined Utility System, (AMBAC), | |
| 5.50%, 9/1/32 | 2,268,960 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Utilities (continued) | |
$ 5,000 | Orangeburg County, Solid Waste, (South Carolina Electric | |
| and Gas Co.), (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.70%, 11/1/24 | $ 5,001,800 |
1,100 | South Carolina Jobs Economic Development Authority, | |
| (South Carolina Electric and Gas Co.), (AMBAC), | |
| 5.20%, 11/1/27 | 1,143,395 |
| | $ 9,574,205 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 10.9% | |
$ 500 | Anderson County, Water and Sewer System, (AGC), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/24 | $ 559,910 |
1,970 | Beaufort-Jasper, Water and Sewer Authority, (AGM), | |
| 4.50%, 3/1/31 | 1,975,240 |
515 | Cayce, Waterworks and Sewer Revenue, (XLCA), | |
| 4.625%, 7/1/27 | 527,968 |
1,875 | Greenwood, Metropolitan District Sewer System, (AGM), | |
| Variable Rate, 23.841%, 10/1/30(2)(3)(4) | 2,221,275 |
3,650 | Lugoff-Elgin, Water Authority, (NPFG), 4.625%, 7/1/37 | 3,507,431 |
1,045 | Richland County, Sewer System, (Broad River), (XLCA), | |
| 4.50%, 3/1/34 | 1,045,930 |
1,000 | Spartanburg, Waterworks and Sewer Revenue, (AGC), | |
| 4.625%, 6/1/36 | 996,170 |
825 | Spartanburg, Waterworks and Sewer Revenue, (AGC), | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/32 | 858,454 |
2,000 | Spartanburg, Waterworks and Sewer Revenue, (AGC), | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/39 | 2,059,660 |
4,750 | Sumter, Waterworks and Sewer System, (XLCA), | |
| 4.50%, 12/1/32 | 4,591,967 |
| | $ 18,344,005 |
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 13.5% | |
$ 6,000 | Berkeley County, School District, 5.125%, 12/1/30 | $ 6,104,100 |
320 | Charleston Educational Excellence Financing Corp., | |
| 5.25%, 12/1/22 | 341,440 |
1,105 | Charleston Educational Excellence Financing Corp., | |
| 5.25%, 12/1/28 | 1,149,996 |
3,000 | Greenville County, School District, 5.00%, 12/1/24(1) | 3,165,150 |
150 | Greenville County, School District, 5.00%, 12/1/28 | 154,851 |
3,745 | Laurens County, School District, 5.25%, 12/1/30 | 3,541,047 |
3,270 | Lexington, One School Facility Corp., 5.00%, 12/1/27 | 3,364,209 |
1,470 | Lexington, One School Facility Corp., 5.25%, 12/1/27 | 1,527,594 |
2,220 | Newberry, (Newberry County School District), | |
| 5.00%, 12/1/30 | 2,032,055 |
1,470 | Newberry, (Newberry County School District), | |
| 5.25%, 12/1/25 | 1,465,193 |
| | $ 22,845,635 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
63 |
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund as o f F e br uar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
Other Revenue — 7.0% | |
$21,465 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/50 | $ 799,571 |
7,600 | Tobacco Settlement Management Authority, Escrowed to | |
| Maturity, 6.375%, 5/15/30 | 9,214,240 |
1,815 | Tobacco Settlement Revenue Management Authority, | |
| Prerefunded to 5/15/11, 5.00%, 6/1/18 | 1,814,873 |
| | $ 11,828,684 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 3.1% | |
$23,870 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0.00%, 8/1/56 | $ 1,210,448 |
3,235 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | 3,211,902 |
810 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, | |
| 6.75%, 10/1/37 | 879,255 |
| | $ 5,301,605 |
|
Student Loan — 1.7% | |
$ 2,855 | South Carolina State Education Assistance Authority, | |
| 5.10%, 10/1/29 | $ 2,889,431 |
| | $ 2,889,431 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 100.4% | |
(identified cost $166,923,689) | $169,643,374 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (0.4)% | $ (740,976) |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $168,902,398 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc. FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp. XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by South Carolina municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2010, 49.2% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 4.2% to 14.6% of total investments.
(1) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
(2) | Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in certain transactions and remain exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At February 28, 2010, the aggregate value of these securities is $2,221,275 or 1.3% of the Fund’s net assets. |
(3) | Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $5,625,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the inverse floater. |
(4) | Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at February 28, 2010. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
64 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) | | | | |
| | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 96.4% | |
|
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Education — 6.1% | |
$1,425 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson | |
| County, (Vanderbilt University), Series A, | |
| 5.00%, 10/1/39 | $ 1,502,135 |
1,000 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson | |
| County, (Vanderbilt University), Series B, | |
| 5.00%, 10/1/39 | 1,054,130 |
1,000 | Tennessee State School Bond Authority, 5.00%, 5/1/39 | 1,049,860 |
| | $ 3,606,125 |
|
Electric Utilities — 6.1% | |
$1,500 | Chattanooga, Electric Revenue, 5.00%, 9/1/33 | $ 1,580,415 |
500 | Clarksville, Electric Revenue, 5.00%, 9/1/34 | 523,315 |
500 | Knoxville, Electric Revenue, 4.50%, 7/1/28 | 514,885 |
1,000 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson | |
| County, 5.125%, 5/15/26 | 1,015,350 |
| | $ 3,633,965 |
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.4% | |
$ 470 | Sullivan County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities | |
| Board, (Wellmont Health System), Prerefunded to | |
| 9/1/12, 6.25%, 9/1/22 | $ 537,657 |
280 | Sullivan County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities | |
| Board, (Wellmont Health System), Prerefunded to | |
| 9/1/12, 6.25%, 9/1/22 | 320,306 |
| | $ 857,963 |
|
General Obligations — 4.0% | |
$ 350 | Johnson City, 5.00%, 6/1/31 | $ 362,576 |
1,000 | Tennessee, 5.00%, 5/1/29 | 1,088,410 |
850 | Williamson County, 3.25%, 4/1/17(1) | 905,343 |
| | $ 2,356,329 |
|
Hospital — 7.8% | |
$ 500 | Chattanooga, Health, Educational and Housing Facility | |
| Board, (Catholic Health Initiatives), 6.25%, 10/1/33 | $ 555,385 |
1,000 | Johnson City, Health and Educational Facilities Board, | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/36 | 979,490 |
5,000 | Knox County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities | |
| Board, (Covenant Health), 0.00%, 1/1/39 | 812,300 |
3,200 | Knox County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities | |
| Board, (Covenant Health), 0.00%, 1/1/42 | 421,408 |
500 | Knox County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities | |
| Board, (East Tennessee Hospital), 5.75%, 7/1/33 | 475,340 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Hospital (continued) | |
$ 500 | Shelby County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities | |
| Board, (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/31 | $ 515,590 |
1,000 | Sullivan County, Health, Educational and Facilities Board, | |
| (Wellmont Health System), 5.25%, 9/1/36 | 905,970 |
| | $ 4,665,483 |
|
Housing — 6.0% | |
$ 490 | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, (AMT), | |
| 4.85%, 1/1/32 | $ 482,826 |
495 | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, (AMT), | |
| 4.85%, 7/1/38 | 470,834 |
475 | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, (AMT), | |
| 4.95%, 1/1/37 | 460,560 |
1,315 | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, (AMT), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/32 | 1,319,458 |
475 | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, (AMT), | |
| 5.10%, 7/1/38 | 470,749 |
365 | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, (AMT), | |
| 5.375%, 7/1/23 | 367,610 |
| | $ 3,572,037 |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 0.8% | |
$ 375 | Hardeman County, (Correctional Facilities Corp.), | |
| 7.75%, 8/1/17 | $ 352,943 |
150 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), | |
| (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | 134,325 |
| | $ 487,268 |
|
Insured-Education — 2.3% | |
$1,230 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson | |
| County, (Meharry Medical College), (AMBAC), | |
| 6.00%, 12/1/19 | $ 1,396,038 |
| | $ 1,396,038 |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 14.2% | |
$1,000 | Lawrenceburg, Electric, (NPFG), 6.625%, 7/1/18 | $ 1,214,600 |
1,000 | Lawrenceburg, Public Building Authority, (Electric System- | |
| Public Works), (AGM), Prerefunded to 7/1/11, | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/26 | 1,062,090 |
500 | Lawrenceburg, Public Building Authority, (Electric System- | |
| Public Works), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/26 | 536,495 |
1,000 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson | |
| County, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 5/15/29 | 1,032,530 |
2,000 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson | |
| County, (NPFG), 0.00%, 5/15/17 | 1,634,160 |
1,000 | Pleasant View, Utility District, (NPFG), 5.00%, 9/1/32 | 1,002,230 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
65 |
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipal Income Fund as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities (continued) | |
$ 260 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/30 | $ 265,215 |
200 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/34 | 199,712 |
420 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/35 | 419,387 |
300 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/29 | 306,588 |
680 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/16 | 753,100 |
| | $ 8,426,107 |
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 11.4% | |
$ 175 | Bristol, (Bristol Memorial Hospital), (FGIC), Escrowed to | |
| Maturity, 6.75%, 9/1/10 | $ 180,920 |
1,500 | Johnson City, Health and Educational Facilities Board, | |
(Johnson City Medical Center), (NPFG), Prerefunded to |
| 7/1/23, 5.125%, 7/1/25 | 1,513,050 |
825 | Knox County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities | |
| Board, (Covenant Health), (AGM), Prerefunded to | |
| 1/1/13, 5.00%, 1/1/26 | 920,981 |
500 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (AGM), Prerefunded | |
| to 7/1/12, 5.125%, 7/1/26 | 557,270 |
250 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), Prerefunded | |
| to 7/1/13, 5.00%, 7/1/32 | 283,055 |
945 | Shelby County, (Lebonheur Children’s Hospital), (NPFG), | |
| Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/15/12 | 1,004,346 |
2,000 | West Wilson Utility District Waterworks, (NPFG), | |
| Prerefunded to 6/1/14, 5.00%, 6/1/34 | 2,316,480 |
| | $ 6,776,102 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 7.8% | |
$ 750 | Blount County, Public Building Authority, (AGC), | |
| 4.50%, 6/1/30 | $ 750,982 |
500 | Blount County, Public Building Authority, (AGC), | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/32 | 517,410 |
1,425 | Franklin, Special School District, (AGM), 0.00%, 6/1/19 | 1,039,794 |
2,500 | Franklin, Special School District, (AGM), 0.00%, 6/1/20 | 1,733,200 |
530 | Memphis, (AGC), 5.00%, 4/1/26 | 575,962 |
| | $ 4,617,348 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 1.1% | |
$ 675 | Knox County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities | |
| Board, (Covenant Health), (AGM), 5.00%, 1/1/26 | $ 679,941 |
| | $ 679,941 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 1.0% | |
$ 500 | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to | |
| Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | $ 605,105 |
| | $ 605,105 |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 2.2% | |
$3,000 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/34 | $ 550,590 |
4,450 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/44 | 399,565 |
1,750 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/33 | 349,020 |
| | $ 1,299,175 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 2.9% | |
$ 530 | Memphis-Shelby County, Airport Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| (AMT), 6.00%, 3/1/24 | $ 535,835 |
560 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), | |
| (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(2) | 575,719 |
640 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.25%, 7/1/32 | 621,920 |
| | $ 1,733,474 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 13.7% | |
$1,000 | Clarksville, Water, Sewer and Gas, (AGM), | |
| 5.25%, 2/1/18 | $ 1,159,640 |
1,000 | Harpeth Valley Utilities District, Davidson and Williamson | |
| Counties, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 9/1/35 | 1,026,440 |
750 | Hawkins County, First Utility District, (AGC), | |
| 5.00%, 6/1/42 | 762,128 |
875 | Knox County, First Utility District, (NPFG), | |
| 5.00%, 12/1/25 | 912,126 |
500 | Knoxville, Waste Water System, (AGM), 4.50%, 4/1/37 | 495,340 |
1,000 | Knoxville, Waste Water System, (NPFG), 4.00%, 4/1/40 | 898,210 |
1,000 | Memphis, Sanitary Sewer System, (AGM), | |
| 4.75%, 7/1/24 | 1,048,000 |
1,000 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson | |
| County, Water System, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.20%, 1/1/13 | 1,084,430 |
500 | South Blount County, Utility District, Water Revenue, | |
| (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/33 | 509,250 |
300 | West Wilson Utility District Waterworks, (NPFG), | |
| 4.00%, 6/1/32 | 268,662 |
| | $ 8,164,226 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
66 |
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipal Income Fund as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
Other Revenue — 1.6% | |
$6,550 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/50 | $ 243,988 |
750 | Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Revenue, | |
| 5.25%, 9/1/26 | 730,612 |
| | $ 974,600 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 3.8% | |
$ 135 | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.625%, 12/1/29 | $ 137,064 |
145 | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.75%, 12/1/34 | 147,259 |
4,815 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0.00%, 8/1/56 | 244,169 |
1,365 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | 1,355,254 |
325 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37 | 352,787 |
| | $ 2,236,533 |
|
Transportation — 2.2% | |
$1,250 | Memphis-Shelby County, Airport Authority, (AMT), | |
| 5.75%, 7/1/24 | $ 1,328,038 |
| | $ 1,328,038 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 96.4% | |
(identified cost $56,217,778) | $57,415,857 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 3.6% | $ 2,127,080 |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $59,542,937 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio
of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax
preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum
Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Tennessee
municipalities. In addition, 13.0% of the Fund’s net assets at
February 28, 2010 were invested in municipal obligations issued
by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to
meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments
in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk
associated with such economic developments, at February 28,
2010, 58.7% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of
various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance
agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual
financial institution ranged from 1.0% to 27.4% of total
investments.
(1) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
(2) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
67 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) | | | | |
| | |
Tax-Exe m pt Inve stm e nts — 102. 0% | |
|
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Education — 8.1% | |
$ 1,700 | Alexandria Industrial Development Authority, (Episcopal | |
| High School), 5.00%, 1/1/40 | $ 1,718,343 |
5,100 | University of Virginia, 5.00%, 6/1/40(1) | 5,376,624 |
4,000 | Virginia College Building Authority, 5.00%, 9/1/33 | 4,246,160 |
275 | Virginia College Building Authority, 5.00%, 9/1/38 | 289,102 |
| | $ 11,630,229 |
|
Electric Utilities — 1.0% | |
$ 1,500 | Chesterfield County Economic Development Authority, | |
| (Virginia Electric Power Co. Project), (AMT), | |
| 5.60%, 11/1/31 | $ 1,472,175 |
| | $ 1,472,175 |
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 0.1% | |
$ 75 | Henrico County Economic Development, (Bon Secours | |
| Health System, Inc.), Prerefunded to 11/15/12, | |
| 5.60%, 11/15/30 | $ 84,588 |
| | $ 84,588 |
|
General Obligations — 6.6% | |
$ 2,820 | Loudoun County, 5.00%, 7/1/27 | $ 3,148,671 |
1,390 | Peninsula Airport Commission, (City Guaranteed), (AMT), | |
| 5.50%, 7/15/21 | 1,430,491 |
500 | Portsmouth, 4.75%, 7/15/25 | 534,130 |
675 | Portsmouth, 5.25%, 7/15/25 | 755,311 |
1,980 | Virginia Public School Authority, 4.50%, 8/1/32 | 1,992,375 |
1,550 | Virginia Public School Authority, 5.00%, 8/1/21 | 1,666,730 |
| | $ 9,527,708 |
|
Hospital — 15.5% | |
$ 2,250 | Albemarle County Industrial Development Authority, | |
| (Martha Jefferson Hospital), 5.25%, 10/1/35 | $ 2,234,205 |
5,000 | Fairfax County Industrial Development Authority, (Inova | |
| Health System Hospitals), 5.00%, 8/15/23(2) | 5,465,880 |
3,000 | Fairfax County Industrial Development Authority, (Inova | |
| Health System Hospitals), 5.50%, 5/15/35 | 3,143,340 |
1,000 | Fauquier County Industrial Development Authority, | |
| (Fauquier Hospital), 5.25%, 10/1/37 | 985,610 |
795 | Henrico County Economic Development, (Bon Secours | |
| Health System, Inc.), 5.60%, 11/15/30 | 804,707 |
465 | Prince William County Industrial Development Authority, | |
| 5.20%, 10/1/30 | 429,585 |
1,000 | Prince William County Industrial Development Authority, | |
| (Potomac Hospital Corp.), 5.35%, 10/1/36 | 899,440 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Hospital (continued) | |
$ 3,000 | Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, (Sentara | |
| Healthcare), 5.00%, 11/1/40 | $ 3,035,610 |
1,500 | Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, (Wellmont | |
| Health), 5.25%, 9/1/27 | 1,449,990 |
2,000 | Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, (Wellmont | |
| Health), 5.25%, 9/1/37 | 1,816,580 |
2,000 | Winchester Industrial Development Authority, (Valley | |
| Health System), 5.25%, 1/1/37 | 2,043,680 |
| | $ 22,308,627 |
|
Housing — 8.1% | |
$ 5,000 | Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority, | |
| (Cedar Ridge), (AMT), 4.85%, 10/1/48 | $ 4,653,250 |
1,790 | Multifamily Housing Bond Pass Through Certificates of | |
| Beneficial Owners, (Prince William County), (AMT), | |
| 6.00% to 11/01/2022 (Put Date), 11/1/33 | 1,615,869 |
2,750 | Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), | |
| 4.90%, 1/1/33 | 2,756,242 |
1,000 | Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), Variable | |
| Rate, 31.756%, 10/1/35(3)(4)(5) | 1,168,730 |
1,500 | Virginia Housing Development Authority, Series A1, | |
| (AMT), 5.10%, 10/1/35 | 1,525,350 |
| | $ 11,719,441 |
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 4.2% | |
$ 1,250 | James City County Industrial Development Authority, | |
| (Anheuser Busch Cos., Inc.), (AMT), 6.00%, 4/1/32 | $ 1,250,175 |
1,250 | King George County Industrial Development Authority, | |
(Waste Management Inc.), (AMT), 6.00% to 5/3/10 |
| (Put Date), 6/1/23(3) | 1,257,238 |
1,630 | Norfolk Airport Authority, (AMT), 6.25%, 1/1/30 | 1,514,563 |
2,230 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), | |
| (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | 1,996,965 |
| | $ 6,018,941 |
|
Insured-Education — 5.5% | |
$ 6,655 | Virginia College Building Authority, (Washington and Lee | |
| University), (NPFG), 5.25%, 1/1/31 | $ 7,872,665 |
| | $ 7,872,665 |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 3.7% | |
$ 2,000 | Halifax County Industrial Development Authority, (Old | |
| Dominion Electric Cooperation), (AMBAC), (AMT), | |
| 5.625%, 6/1/28 | $ 2,069,780 |
2,015 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.50%, 7/1/16 | 2,231,612 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
68 |
| | |
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipal Income Fund a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
P O R T F O L I O O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Electric Utilities (continued) | |
$ 1,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (XLCA), | |
| 5.375%, 7/1/18 | $ 1,096,710 |
| | $ 5,398,102 |
|
Insured-General Obligations — 0.5% | |
$ 710 | Fairfax, (NPFG), 4.50%, 1/15/36 | $ 716,326 |
| | $ 716,326 |
|
Insured-Hospital — 4.1% | |
$ 325 | Harrisonburg Industrial Development Authority, | |
| (Rockingham Memorial Hospital), (AMBAC), | |
| 5.00%, 8/15/46 | $ 286,491 |
1,500 | Henrico County, (Bon Secours Health System, Inc.), | |
| (NPFG), 6.25%, 8/15/20 | 1,693,935 |
3,655 | Virginia Beach, (Virginia Beach Memorial Hospital), | |
| (AMBAC), 5.125%, 2/15/18 | 3,993,124 |
| | $ 5,973,550 |
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of | |
Participation — 1.3% | |
$ 1,950 | Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 4.50%, 12/1/36 | $ 1,951,014 |
| | $ 1,951,014 |
|
Insured-Pooled Loans — 1.2% | |
$ 250 | Stafford County & Staunton Industrial Development | |
| Authority, (CIFG), 4.75%, 8/1/29 | $ 231,435 |
1,640 | Stafford County & Staunton Industrial Development | |
| Authority, (CIFG), 5.00%, 8/1/36 | 1,459,584 |
| | $ 1,691,019 |
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 0.2% | |
$ 1,020 | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), | |
| 0.00%, 7/1/28 | $ 308,509 |
| | $ 308,509 |
|
Insured-Transportation — 17.8% | |
$ 5,000 | Chesapeake Bay Bridge and Tunnel Commission, | |
| (General Resolution), (NPFG), 5.50%, 7/1/25 | $ 5,382,350 |
1,000 | Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airport Authority System, | |
| (FGIC), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.00%, 10/1/33 | 987,670 |
1,000 | Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airport Authority System, | |
| (FGIC), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.25%, 10/1/32 | 1,004,520 |
5,255 | Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airport Authority System, | |
| (NPFG), (AMT), 5.50%, 10/1/27 | 5,343,547 |
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
Insured-Transportation (continued) | |
$ 1,000 | Norfolk Airport Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), | |
| 5.125%, 7/1/31 | $ 1,004,900 |
3,040 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), | |
| (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(2) | 3,125,333 |
1,600 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, | |
| (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/29 | 1,640,272 |
3,800 | Richmond, Metropolitan Authority Expressway, (FGIC), | |
| (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/15/22 | 4,120,112 |
3,000 | Virginia Port Authority, (AGM), (FGIC), (AMT), | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/36 | 2,978,070 |
| | $ 25,586,774 |
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 2.9% | |
$ 3,000 | Spotsylvania County, Water and Sewer, (AGM), | |
| 4.50%, 6/1/32 | $ 3,005,910 |
1,000 | Upper Occoquan Sewer Authority, (NPFG), | |
| 5.15%, 7/1/20 | 1,174,820 |
| | $ 4,180,730 |
|
Other Revenue — 5.4% | |
$ 7,000 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/50 | $ 260,750 |
14,980 | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, | |
| 0.00%, 5/15/55 | 285,818 |
1,250 | Prince William County Industrial Development Authority, | |
| (Catholic Diocese Arlington), 5.50%, 10/1/33 | 1,262,038 |
40,000 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 0.00%, 6/1/47 | 1,633,200 |
2,000 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 5.00%, 6/1/47 | 1,374,180 |
2,710 | Virginia Resources Authority Infrastructure Revenue, | |
| 5.25%, 11/1/33 | 2,936,556 |
| | $ 7,752,542 |
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 2.3% | |
$ 1,065 | Fairfax County Economic Development Authority, | |
| (Goodwin House, Inc.), 5.125%, 10/1/37 | $ 990,056 |
1,480 | Fairfax County Economic Development Authority, | |
| (Goodwin House, Inc.), 5.125%, 10/1/42 | 1,358,596 |
1,000 | Virginia Beach Development Authority, (Westminster- | |
| Canterbury), 5.375%, 11/1/32 | 926,490 |
| | $ 3,275,142 |
|
Special Tax Revenue — 3.5% | |
$ 5,095 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | $ 5,058,622 |
| | $ 5,058,622 |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
69 |
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipal Income Fund as o f F e bruar y 28, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (U na u d i ted) CONT’D
| | |
Principal Amount | | |
(000’s omitted) | Security | Value |
|
|
Transportation — 1.8% | |
$ 1,000 | Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airport Authority System, | |
| (AMT), 5.375%, 10/1/29 | $ 1,029,420 |
1,500 | Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, | |
| 5.00%, 7/1/32 | 1,574,145 |
| | $ 2,603,565 |
|
Water and Sewer — 8.2% | |
$ 2,795 | Fairfax County Water Authority, 5.25%, 4/1/27 | $ 3,420,214 |
3,000 | James City Service Authority, Water and Sewer, | |
| 4.75%, 1/15/39 | 3,046,200 |
2,500 | Upper Occoquan Sewer Authority, 4.50%, 7/1/38 | 2,485,975 |
1,755 | Upper Occoquan Sewer Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/41 | 1,835,537 |
1,000 | Virginia Resources Authority Clean Water Revenue, | |
| 5.00%, 10/1/31 | 1,081,910 |
| | $ 11,869,836 |
|
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 102.0% | |
(identified cost $143,736,487) | $147,000,105 |
|
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (2.0)% | $ (2,915,702) |
|
Net Assets — 100.0% | $144,084,403 |
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc. FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp. XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Virginia municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2010, 36.5% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.7% to 22.8% of total investments.
(1) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
(2) | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
(3) | Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in certain transactions and remain exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At February 28, 2010, the aggregate value of these securities is $2,425,968 or 1.7% of the Fund’s net assets. |
(4) | Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at February 28, 2010. |
(5) | Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $4,000,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the inverse floater. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
70 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
|
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) | | | |
|
S t a t e m e n t s o f A s s e t s a n d L i a b i l i t i e s | | | | | | |
|
As of February 28, 2010 | | | | | | |
|
| Alabama Fund | Arkansas Fund | Georgia Fund | Kentucky Fund |
|
Assets | | | | | | |
|
Investments — | | | | | | |
Identified cost | $55,005,307 | $70,211,679 | $91,267,358 | $52,968,275 |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | 1,733,311 | | (198,345) | 1,660,829 | 1,264,085 |
|
Investments, at value | $ 56,738,618 | $70,013,334 | $ 92,928,187 | $54,232,360 |
Cash | $ 2,346,128 | $ 2,082,866 | $ 403,426 | $ 451,411 |
Interest receivable | | 665,265 | | 804,690 | 1,016,275 | 573,357 |
Receivable for investments sold | | 73,706 | | 171,351 | 92,716 | 384,636 |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | 93,914 | | 58,264 | 38,412 | 8,373 |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | — | | 155,451 | 89,896 | — |
|
Total assets | $ 59,917,631 | $73,285,956 | $ 94,568,912 | $55,650,137 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | |
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued | $ 1,305,000 | $ 600,000 | $ 7,920,000 | $ — |
Payable for investments purchased | | — | | — | 186,091 | — |
Payable for when-issued securities | | 962,515 | | — | — | — |
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | 26,250 | | — | 63,750 | — |
Payable for open swap contracts | | 29,102 | | 88,922 | 129,341 | 125,393 |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | 179,253 | | 258,035 | 49,265 | 186,879 |
Distributions payable | | 87,964 | | 74,467 | 122,698 | 49,663 |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | 13,379 | | 18,858 | 24,501 | 13,009 |
Distribution and service fees | | 12,158 | | 16,214 | 20,830 | 12,092 |
Interest expense and fees payable | | 2,913 | | 1,219 | 12,630 | — |
Accrued expenses | | 42,951 | | 42,244 | 50,538 | 39,826 |
|
Total liabilities | $ 2,661,485 | $ 1,099,959 | $ 8,579,644 | $ 426,862 |
|
Net Assets | $ 57,256,146 | $72,185,997 | $ 85,989,268 | $55,223,275 |
|
Sources of Net Assets | | | | | | |
|
Paid-in capital | $56,792,790 | $75,908,386 | $90,782,542 | $57,857,563 |
Accumulated net realized loss | | (1,153,896) | | (3,542,874) | (6,274,400) | (3,779,692) |
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income | | (51,835) | | (47,699) | (31,719) | 6,712 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | 1,669,087 | | (131,816) | 1,512,845 | 1,138,692 |
|
Net Assets | $ 57,256,146 | $72,185,997 | $ 85,989,268 | $55,223,275 |
|
Class A Shares | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $45,660,019 | $63,385,715 | $63,049,986 | $48,966,061 |
Shares Outstanding | | 4,749,565 | | 6,920,613 | 7,187,581 | 5,589,946 |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ 9.61 | $ 9.16 | $ 8.77 | $ 8.76 |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 95.25 of net asset value per share) | $ 10.09 | $ 9.62 | $ 9.21 | $ 9.20 |
|
Class B Shares | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $ 5,023,536 | $ 3,614,327 | $ 5,913,584 | $ 3,876,201 |
Shares Outstanding | | 475,064 | | 367,339 | 630,895 | 409,829 |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ 10.57 | $ 9.84 | $ 9.37 | $ 9.46 |
|
Class C Shares | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $ 2,089,810 | $ 5,185,955 | $ 9,349,065 | $ 2,381,013 |
Shares Outstanding | | 197,462 | | 527,148 | 996,695 | 251,584 |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ 10.58 | $ 9.84 | $ 9.38 | $ 9.46 |
|
Class I Shares | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $ 4,482,781 | $ — | $ 7,676,633 | $ — |
Shares Outstanding | | 466,034 | | — | 872,667 | — |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ 9.62 | $ — | $ 8.80 | $ — |
On sales of $50,000 or more ($25,000 or more prior to October 12, 2009), the offering price of Class A shares is reduced. | | |
* Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. | | | | |
|
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
|
71 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
|
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
|
S t a t e m e n t s o f A s s e t s a n d L i a b i l i t i e s | | | | | | | |
|
As of February 28, 2010 | | | | | | | | |
|
| Louisiana Fund | Maryland Fund | Missouri Fund | North Carolina Fund |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | |
|
Investments — | | | | | | | | |
Identified cost | $39,522,270 | $ 99,027,979 | $ 99,637,736 | $115,981,361 |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | (42,802) | | 711,415 | | 2,350,242 | 4,657,785 |
|
Investments, at value | $39,479,468 | $ 99,739,394 | $ 101,987,978 | $ 120,639,146 |
Cash | $ 492,543 | $ 2,299,989 | $ 951,386 | $ 2,223,410 |
Interest receivable | | 541,888 | | 1,222,721 | | 1,175,758 | 1,415,546 |
Receivable for investments sold | | 20,255 | | | — | | 129,231 | — |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | 67,222 | | 191,558 | | 24,778 | 313,490 |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | 46,690 | | 102,439 | | 112,892 | — |
|
Total assets | $40,648,066 | $ 103,556,101 | $ 104,382,023 | $ 124,591,592 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued | $ 310,000 | $ 2,280,000 | $ 1,880,000 | $ 7,970,000 |
Payable for when-issued securities | | 520,075 | | | — | | — | 4,718,672 |
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | 3,781 | | | 79,500 | | 59,250 | — |
Payable for open swap contracts | | — | | | — | | 59,011 | — |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | 33,042 | | 152,230 | | 141,938 | 288,607 |
Distributions payable | | 53,055 | | 116,727 | | 93,645 | 158,534 |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | 7,446 | | | 29,234 | | 31,018 | 33,019 |
Distribution and service fees | | 8,239 | | | 26,866 | | 22,119 | 23,320 |
Interest expense and fees payable | | 630 | | | 5,219 | | 5,218 | 38,240 |
Accrued expenses | | 33,536 | | | 54,992 | | 53,579 | 61,719 |
|
Total liabilities | $ 969,804 | $ 2,744,768 | $ 2,345,778 | $ 13,292,111 |
|
Net Assets | $39,678,262 | $ 100,811,333 | $ 102,036,245 | $ 111,299,481 |
|
Sources of Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
|
Paid-in capital | $41,933,835 | $107,738,127 | $106,406,905 | $110,408,393 |
Accumulated net realized loss | | (2,226,415) | | (7,645,618) | | (6,744,271) | (3,966,642) |
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income | | (14,273) | | | 11,340 | | 48,765 | 199,945 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | (14,885) | | 707,484 | | 2,324,846 | 4,657,785 |
|
Net Assets | $39,678,262 | $ 100,811,333 | $ 102,036,245 | $ 111,299,481 |
|
Class A Shares | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $36,183,735 | $ 75,541,316 | $ 90,987,961 | $ 80,720,105 |
Shares Outstanding | | 3,894,623 | | 8,401,880 | | 9,711,612 | 8,897,885 |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ 9.29 | $ 8.99 | $ 9.37 | $ 9.07 |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | | | |
(100 95.25 of net asset value per share) | $ 9.75 | $ 9.44 | $ 9.84 | $ 9.52 |
|
Class B Shares | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $ 1,722,361 | $ 7,033,259 | $ 5,418,812 | $ 4,523,943 |
Shares Outstanding | | 175,337 | | 717,276 | | 523,324 | 463,669 |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ 9.82 | $ 9.81 | $ 10.35 | $ 9.76 |
|
Class C Shares | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $ 1,772,166 | $ 13,833,488 | $ 5,629,472 | $ 11,231,342 |
Shares Outstanding | | 180,167 | | 1,410,525 | | 544,178 | 1,150,960 |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ 9.84 | $ 9.81 | $ 10.34 | $ 9.76 |
|
Class I Shares | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $ — | $ 4,403,270 | $ — | $ 14,824,091 |
Shares Outstanding | | — | | 488,833 | | — | 1,629,452 |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ — | $ 9.01 | $ — | $ 9.10 |
On sales of $50,000 or more ($25,000 or more prior to October 12, 2009), the offering price of Class A shares is reduced. | | | |
* Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. | | | | | |
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
|
72 |
| | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
|
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
|
S t a t e m e n t s o f A s s e t s a n d L i a b i l i t i e s | | | | | | |
|
As of February 28, 2010 | | | | | | | |
|
| Oregon Fund | South Carolina Fund | Tennessee Fund | Virginia Fund |
|
Assets | | | | | | | |
|
Investments — | | | | | | | |
Identified cost | $157,924,096 | $166,923,689 | $56,217,778 | $143,736,487 |
Unrealized appreciation | | 1,168,651 | | 2,719,685 | 1,198,079 | 3,263,618 |
|
Investments, at value | $ 159,092,747 | $ 169,643,374 | $ 57,415,857 | $ 147,000,105 |
Cash | $ — | $ 333,319 | $ 939,451 | $ 727,944 |
Interest receivable | | 1,361,162 | | 2,258,693 | 656,385 | 1,815,561 |
Receivable for investments sold | | 2,970,000 | | | 621,967 | 979,700 | — |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | 1,088,705 | | | 150,870 | 111,229 | 328,718 |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | — | | | — | 64,112 | 141,464 |
|
Total assets | $ 164,512,614 | $ 173,008,223 | $ 60,166,734 | $ 150,013,792 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | |
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued | $ 6,900,000 | $ 3,350,000 | $ 280,000 | $ 4,850,000 |
Demand note payable | | 900,000 | | | — | — | — |
Payable for investments purchased | | 2,955,030 | | | — | — | — |
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | — | | | — | 45,000 | 270,000 |
Payable for open swap contracts | | — | | | — | 97,006 | 80,030 |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | 179,379 | | | 351,632 | 66,242 | 395,091 |
Distributions payable | | 129,415 | | | 230,034 | 64,856 | 183,830 |
Due to custodian | | 64,403 | | | — | — | — |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | 49,086 | | | 55,963 | 14,107 | 46,328 |
Distribution and service fees | | 41,566 | | | 41,378 | 15,133 | 32,053 |
Interest expense and fees payable | | 11,245 | | | 7,029 | 569 | 4,894 |
Accrued expenses | | 66,476 | | | 69,789 | 40,884 | 67,163 |
|
Total liabilities | $ 11,296,600 | $ 4,105,825 | $ 623,797 | $ 5,929,389 |
|
Net Assets | $ 153,216,014 | $ 168,902,398 | $ 59,542,937 | $ 144,084,403 |
|
Sources of Net Assets | | | | | | | |
|
Paid-in capital | $164,679,432 | $180,344,307 | $62,695,936 | $150,593,982 |
Accumulated net realized loss | | (12,768,639) | | (14,274,168) | (4,223,851) | (9,529,284) |
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income | | 136,570 | | | 112,574 | (17,716) | 154,350 |
Net unrealized appreciation | | 1,168,651 | | 2,719,685 | 1,088,568 | 2,865,355 |
|
Net Assets | $ 153,216,014 | $ 168,902,398 | $ 59,542,937 | $ 144,084,403 |
|
Class A Shares | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $121,558,790 | $101,417,831 | $48,612,837 | $104,433,684 |
Shares Outstanding | | 13,896,670 | | 11,120,824 | 5,432,848 | 12,077,899 |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ 8.75 | $ 9.12 | $ 8.95 | $ 8.65 |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | | |
(100 95.25 of net asset value per share) | $ 9.19 | $ 9.57 | $ 9.40 | $ 9.08 |
|
Class B Shares | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $ 11,260,283 | $ 8,646,885 | $ 3,614,747 | $ 8,200,937 |
Shares Outstanding | | 1,176,880 | | | 894,090 | 370,800 | 856,831 |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ 9.57 | $ 9.67 | $ 9.75 | $ 9.57 |
|
Class C Shares | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $ 20,396,941 | $ 26,240,791 | $ 7,315,353 | $ 13,507,067 |
Shares Outstanding | | 2,129,557 | | 2,712,231 | 750,926 | 1,410,257 |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ 9.58 | $ 9.67 | $ 9.74 | $ 9.58 |
|
Class I Shares | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets | $ — | $ 32,596,891 | $ — | $ 17,942,715 |
Shares Outstanding | | — | | 3,571,625 | — | 2,070,160 |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | |
(net assets shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $ — | $ 9.13 | $ — | $ 8.67 |
On sales of $50,000 or more ($25,000 or more prior to October 12, 2009), the offering price of Class A shares is reduced. | | |
* Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. | | | | |
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
|
73 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
S t a t e m e n t s o f O p e r a t i o n s | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2010 | | | | | | |
| Alabama Fund | Arkansas Fund | Georgia Fund | Kentucky Fund |
Investment Income | | | | | | |
Interest | $1,403,274 | $1,718,320 | $2,299,636 | $1,415,718 |
Total investment income | $1,403,274 | $1,718,320 | $2,299,636 | $1,415,718 |
|
Expenses | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | $ 77,521 | $ 107,963 | $ 141,956 | $ 76,723 |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | 44,447 | | 62,150 | 62,794 | 48,345 |
Class B | | 27,188 | | 17,174 | 29,643 | 18,968 |
Class C | | 7,898 | | 19,055 | 42,058 | 11,870 |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | 1,177 | | 1,429 | 1,675 | 1,168 |
Custodian fee | | 22,409 | | 26,140 | 31,572 | 21,297 |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | 11,668 | | 12,869 | 18,572 | 12,565 |
Legal and accounting services | | 18,203 | | 19,361 | 21,669 | 17,747 |
Printing and postage | | 4,463 | | 4,693 | 4,238 | 4,290 |
Registration fees | | 792 | | 1,864 | 457 | 1,644 |
Interest expense and fees | | 5,272 | | 4,710 | 37,385 | — |
Miscellaneous | | 8,359 | | 10,898 | 10,660 | 7,563 |
Total expenses | $ 229,397 | $ 288,306 | $ 402,679 | $ 222,180 |
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | $ 30 | $ 69 | $ 23 | $ 35 |
Total expense reductions | $ 30 | $ 69 | $ 23 | $ 35 |
Net expenses | $ 229,367 | $ 288,237 | $ 402,656 | $ 222,145 |
Net investment income | $1,173,907 | $1,430,083 | $1,896,980 | $1,193,573 |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | $ 138,627 | $ (60,008) | $ 99,108 | $ (5,340) |
Financial futures contracts | | 17,490 | | — | 77,169 | — |
Swap contracts | | 97 | | 306,163 | (219,812) | 49,723 |
Net realized gain (loss) | $ 156,214 | $ 246,155 | $ (43,535) | $ 44,383 |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | $1,640,781 | $1,952,943 | $2,399,172 | $2,025,487 |
Financial futures contracts | | (21,525) | | — | (80,351) | — |
Swap contracts | | 29,347 | | (52,864) | 402,821 | 112,746 |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $1,648,603 | $1,900,079 | $2,721,642 | $2,138,233 |
Net realized and unrealized gain | $1,804,817 | $2,146,234 | $2,678,107 | $2,182,616 |
Net increase in net assets from operations | $2,978,724 | $3,576,317 | $4,575,087 | $3,376,189 |
|
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
74 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | | |
S t a t e m e n t s o f O p e r a t i o n s | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2010 | | | | | | | | |
| Louisiana Fund | Maryland Fund | Missouri Fund | | North Carolina Fund |
Investment Income | | | | | | | | |
Interest | $1,125,052 | $2,598,881 | $2,538,816 | | $2,943,877 |
Total investment income | $1,125,052 | $2,598,881 | $2,538,816 | | $2,943,877 |
|
Expenses | | | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | $ 47,352 | $ 180,162 | $ 179,073 | | $ 197,442 |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 37,218 | 75,845 | | 91,186 | | 79,367 |
Class B | | 10,391 | 35,556 | | 28,967 | | 22,399 |
Class C | | 8,450 | 63,396 | | 26,987 | | 46,787 |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | 911 | 1,934 | | 1,975 | | 1,985 |
Custodian fee | | 19,106 | 34,728 | | 37,309 | | 37,282 |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | 6,247 | 23,920 | | 20,513 | | 24,190 |
Legal and accounting services | | 15,716 | 21,491 | | 17,408 | | 17,699 |
Printing and postage | | 2,207 | 6,252 | | 5,971 | | 5,960 |
Registration fees | | 819 | 3,600 | | 1,885 | | 494 |
Interest expense and fees | | 2,434 | 14,799 | | 11,539 | | 38,016 |
Miscellaneous | | 7,430 | 10,330 | | 10,722 | | 10,878 |
Total expenses | $ 158,281 | $ 472,013 | $ 433,535 | | $ 482,499 |
Deduct — | | | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | $ 8 | $ 35 | $ 37 | | $ 44 |
Total expense reductions | $ 8 | $ 35 | $ 37 | | $ 44 |
Net expenses | $ 158,273 | $ 471,978 | $ 433,498 | | $ 482,455 |
Net investment income | $ 966,779 | $2,126,903 | $2,105,318 | | $2,461,422 |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | $ (2,619) | $ (517,626) | $ (260,524) | | $ 317,663 |
Financial futures contracts | | (1,229) | 64,766 | | 45,183 | | — |
Swap contracts | | (114,389) | (250,973) | (276,386) | | (199,754) |
Net realized gain (loss) | $ (118,237) | $ (703,833) | $ (491,727) | | $ 117,909 |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | | | |
Investments | $1,436,619 | $3,983,769 | $3,176,059 | | $2,602,331 |
Financial futures contracts | | (8,085) | (71,218) | | (51,227) | | — |
Swap contracts | | 141,472 | 310,393 | | 401,578 | | 165,515 |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $1,570,006 | $4,222,944 | $3,526,410 | | $2,767,846 |
Net realized and unrealized gain | $1,451,769 | $3,519,111 | $3,034,683 | | $2,885,755 |
Net increase in net assets from operations | $2,418,548 | $5,646,014 | $5,140,001 | | $5,347,177 |
|
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
75 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
S t a t e m e n t s o f O p e r a t i o n s | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2010 | | | | | | |
| Oregon Fund | South Carolina Fund | Tennessee Fund | Virginia Fund |
Investment Income | | | | | | |
Interest | $4,257,495 | $4,403,490 | $1,451,128 | $3,854,890 |
Total investment income | $4,257,495 | $4,403,490 | $1,451,128 | $3,854,890 |
|
Expenses | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | $ 312,855 | $ 324,043 | $ 80,259 | $ 267,658 |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | 121,550 | 104,017 | 46,811 | 104,025 |
Class B | | 55,290 | 43,872 | 18,361 | 44,579 |
Class C | | 94,381 | 118,573 | 30,129 | 61,827 |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | 2,795 | | 3,066 | 1,196 | 2,634 |
Custodian fee | | 49,841 | 54,879 | 22,632 | 45,824 |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | 29,101 | 31,656 | 12,197 | 32,256 |
Legal and accounting services | | 20,552 | 26,116 | 17,003 | 23,084 |
Printing and postage | | 7,637 | | 5,845 | 3,768 | 7,320 |
Registration fees | | 644 | | 352 | 835 | 2,698 |
Interest expense and fees | | 31,629 | 18,770 | 2,198 | 29,266 |
Miscellaneous | | 13,545 | 12,249 | 9,940 | 10,400 |
Total expenses | $ 739,820 | $ 743,438 | $ 245,329 | $ 631,571 |
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | $ 17 | $ 42 | $ 24 | $ 24 |
Total expense reductions | $ 17 | $ 42 | $ 24 | $ 24 |
Net expenses | $ 739,803 | $ 743,396 | $ 245,305 | $ 631,547 |
Net investment income | $3,517,692 | $3,660,094 | $1,205,823 | $3,223,343 |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | $ 941,317 | $ 923,894 | $ 129,646 | $ (31,610) |
Financial futures contracts | | — | | — | 51,348 | 320,585 |
Swap contracts | | (249,266) | (150,242) | (156,749) | (346,316) |
Net realized gain (loss) | $ 692,051 | $ 773,652 | $ 24,245 | $ (57,341) |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | $3,014,423 | $3,257,694 | $1,513,915 | $4,359,039 |
Financial futures contracts | | — | | — | (53,594) | (334,062) |
Swap contracts | | 206,540 | 124,490 | 292,086 | 509,345 |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $3,220,963 | $3,382,184 | $1,752,407 | $4,534,322 |
Net realized and unrealized gain | $3,913,014 | $4,155,836 | $1,776,652 | $4,476,981 |
Net increase in net assets from operations | $7,430,706 | $7,815,930 | $2,982,475 | $7,700,324 |
|
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
76 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
|
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
|
S t a t e m e n t s o f C h a n g e s i n N e t A s s e t s | | | | | |
|
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2010 | | | | | | |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Alabama Fund | Arkansas Fund | Georgia Fund | Kentucky Fund |
From operations — | | | | | | |
Net investment income | $ 1,173,907 | $ 1,430,083 | $ 1,896,980 | $ 1,193,573 |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, financial futures contracts | | | | | |
and swap contracts | | 156,214 | | 246,155 | (43,535) | 44,383 |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial | | | | | |
futures contracts and swap contracts | | 1,648,603 | | 1,900,079 | 2,721,642 | 2,138,233 |
Net increase in net assets from operations | $ 2,978,724 | $ 3,576,317 | $ 4,575,087 | $ 3,376,189 |
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | |
Class A | $ (927,741) | $ (1,273,662) | $ (1,386,969) | $ (1,042,809) |
Class B | | (99,266) | | (61,186) | (115,961) | (71,882) |
Class C | | (28,671) | | (67,497) | (164,324) | (44,955) |
Class I | | (83,954) | | — | (157,930) | — |
Total distributions to shareholders | $ (1,139,632) | $ (1,402,345) | $ (1,825,184) | $ (1,159,646) |
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | |
Class A | $ 2,875,172 | $ 3,939,816 | $ 3,275,493 | $ 2,267,542 |
Class B | | 113,088 | | 257,244 | 55,875 | 66,732 |
Class C | | 593,947 | | 2,042,345 | 1,924,782 | 134,305 |
Class I | | 1,216,908 | | — | 3,157,236 | — |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of | | | | | | |
distributions declared | | | | | | |
Class A | | 520,759 | | 860,763 | 844,092 | 760,624 |
Class B | | 55,145 | | 44,584 | 65,196 | 46,209 |
Class C | | 10,734 | | 24,133 | 101,506 | 28,426 |
Class I | | 9 | | — | 1,639 | — |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | |
Class A | | (3,459,496) | | (2,559,270) | (6,988,689) | (2,937,152) |
Class B | | (555,287) | | (237,187) | (303,309) | (324,634) |
Class C | | (132,058) | | (382,561) | (1,134,916) | (392,256) |
Class I | | (197,438) | | — | (2,278,964) | — |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | |
Class A | | 1,179,911 | | 89,941 | 492,831 | 267,809 |
Class B | | (1,179,911) | | (89,941) | (492,831) | (267,809) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | $ 1,041,483 | $ 3,989,867 | $ (1,280,059) | $ (350,204) |
|
Net increase in net assets | $ 2,880,575 | $ 6,163,839 | $ 1,469,844 | $ 1,866,339 |
|
|
Net Assets | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | $54,375,571 | $66,022,158 | $84,519,424 | $53,356,936 |
At end of period | $57,256,146 | $ 72,185,997 | $85,989,268 | $55,223,275 |
|
|
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in | | | | | |
excess of) net investment income included in | | | | | |
net assets | | | | | | |
|
At end of period | $ (51,835) | $ (47,699) | $ (31,719) | $ 6,712 |
|
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
|
77 |
| | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
|
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
|
S t a t e m e n t s o f C h a n g e s i n N e t A s s e t s | | | | | |
|
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2010 | | | | | | | |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Louisiana Fund | Maryland Fund | Missouri Fund | North Carolina Fund |
From operations — | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | $ 966,779 | $ 2,126,903 | $ 2,105,318 | $ 2,461,422 |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, financial futures | | | | | | |
contracts and swap contracts | | (118,237) | (703,833) | | (491,727) | 117,909 |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, | | | | | | |
financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | 1,570,006 | 4,222,944 | | 3,526,410 | 2,767,846 |
Net increase in net assets from operations | $ 2,418,548 | $ 5,646,014 | $ 5,140,001 | $ 5,347,177 |
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | |
Class A | $ (841,817) | $ (1,654,198) | $ (1,765,425) | $ (1,782,226) |
Class B | | (41,851) | (137,196) | | (96,093) | (90,160) |
Class C | | (34,028) | (244,515) | | (89,634) | (187,408) |
Class I | | — | (52,238) | | — | (247,397) |
Total distributions to shareholders | $ (917,696) | $ (2,088,147) | $ (1,951,152) | $ (2,307,191) |
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | |
Class A | $ 1,666,239 | $ 4,433,227 | $ 4,230,593 | $ 8,654,681 |
Class B | | 54,351 | 315,704 | | 123,193 | 262,616 |
Class C | | 281,313 | 1,669,162 | | 353,540 | 2,676,451 |
Class I | | — | 3,956,577 | | — | 6,751,853 |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of | | | | | | | |
distributions declared | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 525,816 | 1,103,540 | | 1,214,536 | 1,206,445 |
Class B | | 21,326 | | 89,747 | | 52,377 | 48,568 |
Class C | | 9,600 | 140,783 | | 51,770 | 118,014 |
Class I | | — | | 229 | | — | 14,007 |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | |
Class A | | (5,162,643) | (9,291,798) | | (7,993,901) | (10,146,202) |
Class B | | (127,077) | (445,487) | | (333,986) | (730,353) |
Class C | | (257,562) | (821,852) | | (501,473) | (553,406) |
Class I | | — | (29,556) | | — | (535,093) |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 783,808 | 947,433 | | 1,165,149 | 417,503 |
Class B | | (783,808) | (947,433) | | (1,165,149) | (417,503) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | $ (2,988,637) | $ 1,120,276 | $ (2,803,351) | $ 7,767,581 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | $ (1,487,785) | $ 4,678,143 | $ 385,498 | $ 10,807,567 |
|
|
Net Assets | | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | $41,166,047 | $ 96,133,190 | $101,650,747 | $100,491,914 |
At end of period | $39,678,262 | $100,811,333 | $ 102,036,245 | $ 111,299,481 |
|
|
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in | | | | | | |
excess of) net investment income included in | | | | | | |
net assets | | | | | | | |
|
At end of period | $ (14,273) | $ 11,340 | $ 48,765 | $ 199,945 |
|
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
|
78 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
|
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D | | |
|
S t a t e m e n t s o f C h a n g e s i n N e t A s s e t s | | | | |
|
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2010 | | | | | | |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Oregon Fund | South Carolina Fund | Tennessee Fund | Virginia Fund |
From operations — | | | | | | |
Net investment income | $ 3,517,692 | $ 3,660,094 | $ 1,205,823 | $ 3,223,343 |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, financial futures | | | | | |
contracts and swap contracts | | 692,051 | | 773,652 | 24,245 | (57,341) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, | | | | | |
financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | 3,220,963 | 3,382,184 | 1,752,407 | 4,534,322 |
Net increase in net assets from operations | $ 7,430,706 | $ 7,815,930 | $ 2,982,475 | $ 7,700,324 |
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | |
Class A | $ (2,658,022) | $ (2,139,234) | $ (970,285) | $ (2,211,742) |
Class B | | (213,056) | | (157,658) | (66,108) | (166,838) |
Class C | | (363,041) | | (425,125) | (108,297) | (231,856) |
Class I | | — | | (610,582) | — | (318,127) |
Total distributions to shareholders | $ (3,234,119) | $ (3,332,599) | $ (1,144,690) | $ (2,928,563) |
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | |
Class A | $ 7,927,606 | $ 5,034,616 | $ 3,630,837 | $ 5,156,357 |
Class B | | 438,166 | | 371,011 | 46,887 | 371,132 |
Class C | | 1,927,666 | 4,041,409 | 1,624,396 | 1,495,690 |
Class I | | — | 11,465,856 | — | 8,744,202 |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of | | | | | | |
distributions declared | | | | | | |
Class A | | 1,909,443 | 1,536,290 | 602,342 | 1,512,437 |
Class B | | 145,372 | | 113,192 | 41,944 | 112,069 |
Class C | | 296,214 | | 287,535 | 69,959 | 159,996 |
Class I | | — | | 5,539 | — | 612 |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | |
Class A | (11,566,892) | (12,325,583) | (4,348,283) | (13,366,828) |
Class B | | (621,793) | | (740,661) | (245,872) | (772,430) |
Class C | | (1,805,744) | (1,747,615) | (576,978) | (861,191) |
Class I | | — | (3,264,672) | — | (1,122,068) |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | |
Class A | | 1,146,155 | | 802,211 | 423,560 | 1,708,129 |
Class B | | (1,146,155) | | (802,211) | (423,560) | (1,708,129) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | $ (1,349,962) | $ 4,776,917 | $ 845,232 | $ 1,429,978 |
|
Net increase in net assets | $ 2,846,625 | $ 9,260,248 | $ 2,683,017 | $ 6,201,739 |
|
|
Net Assets | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | $150,369,389 | $159,642,150 | $56,859,920 | $137,882,664 |
At end of period | $ 153,216,014 | $ 168,902,398 | $59,542,937 | $ 144,084,403 |
|
|
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in | | | | | |
excess of) net investment income included in | | | | | |
net assets | | | | | | |
|
At end of period | $ 136,570 | $ 112,574 | $ (17,716) | $ 154,350 |
|
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
|
79 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
|
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | |
|
S t a t e m e n t s o f C h a n g e s i n N e t A s s e t s | | | | | |
|
For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 | | | | | | |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Alabama Fund | Arkansas Fund | Georgia Fund | Kentucky Fund |
From operations — | | | | | | |
Net investment income | $ 2,390,478 | $ 2,684,146 | $ 3,782,229 | $ 2,414,329 |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and | | | | | |
swap contracts | | (861,678) | | (1,955,730) | (2,998,078) | (261,585) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial | | | | | |
futures contracts and swap contracts | | (325,640) | | 63,040 | (107,227) | (1,474,472) |
Net increase in net assets from operations | $ 1,203,160 | $ 791,456 | $ 676,924 | $ 678,272 |
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | |
Class A | $ (1,941,418) | $ (2,495,073) | $ (2,928,933) | $ (2,132,268) |
Class B | | (276,068) | | (144,291) | (275,119) | (197,179) |
Class C | �� | (48,047) | | (117,073) | (299,910) | (85,827) |
Class I | | (157,213) | | — | (291,211) | — |
Total distributions to shareholders | $ (2,422,746) | $ (2,756,437) | $ (3,795,173) | $ (2,415,274) |
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | |
Class A | $ 4,720,827 | $ 8,774,484 | $ 7,107,637 | $ 3,728,846 |
Class B | | 361,959 | | 285,655 | 369,416 | 116,742 |
Class C | | 828,931 | | 1,063,014 | 2,467,395 | 679,824 |
Class I | | 1,369,219 | | — | 3,585,981 | — |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of | | | | | | |
distributions declared | | | | | | |
Class A | | 1,036,612 | | 1,628,668 | 1,564,389 | 1,503,801 |
Class B | | 160,039 | | 91,049 | 145,763 | 129,618 |
Class C | | 16,913 | | 31,568 | 181,945 | 55,950 |
Class I | | 2,382 | | — | 281 | — |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | |
Class A | (12,131,372) | | (6,417,709) | (12,672,849) | (8,124,341) |
Class B | | (1,284,994) | | (388,307) | (1,011,295) | (922,098) |
Class C | | (267,183) | | (633,353) | (1,873,255) | (379,959) |
Class I | | (1,902,315) | | — | (1,628,209) | — |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | |
Class A | | 1,299,932 | | 450,313 | 1,060,307 | 1,144,074 |
Class B | | (1,299,932) | | (450,313) | (1,060,307) | (1,144,074) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | $ (7,088,982) | $ 4,435,069 | $ (1,762,801) | $ (3,211,617) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | $ (8,308,568) | $ 2,470,088 | $ (4,881,050) | $ (4,948,619) |
|
|
Net Assets | | | | | | |
At beginning of year | $ 62,684,139 | $63,552,070 | $ 89,400,474 | $58,305,555 |
At end of year | $ 54,375,571 | $66,022,158 | $ 84,519,424 | $53,356,936 |
|
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net | | | | | |
investment income included in net assets | | | | | |
|
At end of year | $ (86,110) | $ (75,437) | $ (103,515) | $ (27,215) |
|
|
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
|
80 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
|
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | |
|
S t a t e m e n t s o f C h a n g e s i n N e t A s s e t s | | | | |
|
For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 | | | | | | |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Louisiana Fund | Maryland Fund | Missouri Fund | North Carolina Fund |
From operations — | | | | | | |
Net investment income | $ 1,985,747 | $ 4,339,712 | $ 4,329,994 | $ 4,735,453 |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts | | | | | |
and swap contracts | | (1,305,699) | (1,686,962) | | (3,414,372) | (2,452,704) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, | | | | | |
financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | (335,426) | (1,442,625) | | (88,236) | 1,800,377 |
Net increase in net assets from operations | $ 344,622 | $ 1,210,125 | $ 827,386 | $ 4,083,126 |
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | |
Class A | $ (1,804,951) | $ (3,580,645) | $ (3,906,457) | $ (3,625,105) |
Class B | | (126,836) | (352,037) | | (249,209) | (227,953) |
Class C | | (38,806) | (434,339) | | (193,728) | (331,542) |
Class I | | — | (10,921) | | — | (337,496) |
Total distributions to shareholders | $ (1,970,593) | $ (4,377,942) | $ (4,349,394) | $ (4,522,096) |
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | |
Class A | $ 3,808,033 | $ 9,938,316 | $ 10,691,243 | $ 9,945,305 |
Class B | | 52,444 | 773,202 | | 518,793 | 342,491 |
Class C | | 1,341,446 | 4,358,135 | | 1,190,313 | 2,873,651 |
Class I | | — | 355,699 | | — | 9,753,330 |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of | | | | | | |
distributions declared | | | | | | |
Class A | | 989,574 | 2,363,946 | | 2,592,146 | 2,281,049 |
Class B | | 50,200 | 221,476 | | 126,532 | 110,828 |
Class C | | 12,130 | 254,186 | | 133,963 | 181,539 |
Class I | | — | — | | — | 9,105 |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | |
Class A | | (8,504,630) | (16,729,443) | | (15,519,694) | (19,942,607) |
Class B | | (364,240) | (2,088,795) | | (479,040) | (641,576) |
Class C | | (34,080) | (1,910,310) | | (1,125,255) | (2,504,249) |
Class I | | — | (24,638) | | — | (3,568,684) |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | |
Class A | | 977,261 | 884,989 | | 774,142 | 1,188,472 |
Class B | | (977,261) | (884,989) | | (774,142) | (1,188,472) |
Net decrease in net assets from Fund share transactions | $ (2,649,123) | $ (2,488,226) | $ (1,870,999) | $ (1,159,818) |
|
Net decrease in net assets | $ (4,275,094) | $ (5,656,043) | $ (5,393,007) | $ (1,598,788) |
|
|
Net Assets | | | | | | |
At beginning of year | $45,441,141 | $101,789,233 | $107,043,754 | $102,090,702 |
At end of year | $41,166,047 | $ 96,133,190 | $ 101,650,747 | $ 100,491,914 |
|
|
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in | | | | | |
excess of) net investment income included in | | | | | |
net assets | | | | | | |
|
At end of year | $ (63,356) | $ (27,416) | $ (105,401) | $ 45,714 |
|
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
|
81 |
| | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
|
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | |
|
S t a t e m e n t s o f C h a n g e s i n N e t A s s e t s | | | |
|
For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Oregon Fund | South Carolina Fund | Tennessee Fund | Virginia Fund |
From operations — | | | | | |
Net investment income | $ 6,649,964 | $ 6,950,448 | $ 2,419,426 | $ 6,095,426 |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts | | | | |
and swap contracts | | (7,552,879) | (8,476,430) | (2,604,220) | (3,740,941) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, | | | | |
financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | 3,128,951 | 2,964,294 | (356,293) | 71,258 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | $ 2,226,036 | $ 1,438,312 | $ (541,087) | $ 2,425,743 |
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | |
Class A | $ (5,413,651) | $ (4,674,242) | $ (2,082,098) | $ (4,863,922) |
Class B | | (521,225) | (388,320) | (180,030) | (474,923) |
Class C | | (710,992) | (792,300) | (194,061) | (419,110) |
Class I | | — | (1,025,428) | — | (375,413) |
Total distributions to shareholders | $ (6,645,868) | $ (6,880,290) | $ (2,456,189) | $ (6,133,368) |
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | |
Class A | $ 17,694,873 | $ 20,208,981 | $ 7,206,625 | $ 14,168,537 |
Class B | | 1,537,564 | 594,631 | 385,743 | 1,073,486 |
Class C | | 6,025,921 | 7,917,400 | 2,933,718 | 4,309,544 |
Class I | | — | 14,769,858 | — | 11,081,818 |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of | | | | | |
distributions declared | | | | | |
Class A | | 3,894,452 | 3,148,856 | 1,299,274 | 2,875,953 |
Class B | | 342,324 | 263,337 | 117,225 | 311,865 |
Class C | | 521,880 | 492,957 | 114,788 | 296,189 |
Class I | | — | 3,984 | — | — |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | |
Class A | (24,835,492) | (27,876,919) | (8,994,885) | (16,401,259) |
Class B | | (2,211,561) | (1,410,443) | (740,187) | (3,311,574) |
Class C | | (3,738,976) | (5,630,087) | (1,008,474) | (1,626,247) |
Class I | | — | (12,877,268) | — | (4,100,393) |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | |
Class A | | 1,492,155 | 930,179 | 648,622 | 1,700,039 |
Class B | | (1,492,155) | (930,179) | (648,622) | (1,700,039) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | $ (769,015) | $ (394,713) | $ 1,313,827 | $ 8,677,919 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | $ (5,188,847) | $ (5,836,691) | $ (1,683,449) | $ 4,970,294 |
|
|
Net Assets | | | | | |
At beginning of year | $155,558,236 | $165,478,841 | $58,543,369 | $132,912,370 |
At end of year | $ 150,369,389 | $ 159,642,150 | $56,859,920 | $ 137,882,664 |
|
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net | | | | |
investment income included in net assets | | | | |
|
At end of year | $ (147,003) | $ (214,921) | $ (78,849) | $ (140,430) |
|
|
|
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
|
82 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Alabama Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.290 | $ 9.330 | $ 9.600 | $ 9.910 | $ 9.890 | $ 9.800 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.204 | $ 0.402 | $ 0.402 | $ 0.394 | $ 0.401 | $ 0.422 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.314 | (0.036) | (0.232) | | (0.261) | 0.026 | 0.099 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.518 | $ 0.366 | $ 0.170 | $ 0.133 | $ 0.427 | $ 0.521 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.198) | $ (0.406) | $ (0.395) | $ (0.395) | $ (0.407) | $ (0.431) |
From net realized gain | | — | — | (0.045) | | (0.048) | — | — |
Total distributions | $ (0.198) | $ (0.406) | $ (0.440) | $ (0.443) | $ (0.407) | $ (0.431) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.610 | $ 9.290 | $ 9.330 | $ 9.600 | $ 9.910 | $ 9.890 |
Total Return(2) | | 5.60%(3) | 4.19% | 1.89% | | 1.30% | 4.46% | 5.43% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $45,660 | $43,090 | $49,124 | $44,947 | $43,163 | $42,390 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.72%(4) | 0.80% | 0.76% | | 0.75%(5) | 0.75% | 0.76%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | 0.02%(4) | 0.05% | 0.11% | | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.05%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.74%(4) | 0.85% | 0.87% | | 0.91%(5) | 0.84% | 0.81%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.72%(4) | 0.79% | 0.74% | | 0.74%(5) | 0.73% | 0.75%(6) |
Net investment income | | 4.30%(4) | 4.59% | 4.20% | | 3.99% | 4.11% | 4.29% |
Portfolio Turnover | | 8%(3) | 22% | 12% | | 29% | 31% | 16% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
83 |
| | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | |
|
| | | Alabama Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $10.230 | $10.270 | $10.560 | $10.900 | $10.870 | $10.770 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.186 | $ 0.370 | $ 0.363 | $ 0.353 | $ 0.362 | $ 0.384 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.335 | (0.036) | (0.255) | | (0.293) | 0.034 | 0.108 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.521 | $ 0.334 | $ 0.108 | $ 0.060 | $ 0.396 | $ 0.492 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.181) | $ (0.374) | $ (0.353) | $ (0.352) | $ (0.366) | $ (0.392) |
From net realized gain | — | — | (0.045) | | (0.048) | — | — |
Total distributions | $ (0.181) | $ (0.374) | $ (0.398) | $ (0.400) | $ (0.366) | $ (0.392) |
Net asset value — End of period | $10.570 | $10.230 | $10.270 | $10.560 | $10.900 | $10.870 |
Total Return(2) | 5.12%(3) | 3.56% | 1.03% | | 0.51% | 3.75% | 4.81%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 5,024 | $ 6,380 | $ 8,643 | $10,690 | $13,854 | $17,556 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.47%(5) | 1.55% | 1.52% | | 1.50%(6) | 1.50% | 1.51%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.02%(5) | 0.05% | 0.11% | | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.05%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.49%(5) | 1.60% | 1.63% | | 1.66%(6) | 1.59% | 1.56%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.47%(5) | 1.54% | 1.49% | | 1.49%(6) | 1.48% | 1.50%(7) |
Net investment income | 3.56%(5) | 3.85% | 3.44% | | 3.25% | 3.37% | 3.55% |
Portfolio Turnover | 8%(3) | 22% | 12% | | 29% | 31% | 16% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.15% due to a change in the timing of payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
84 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | Alabama Fund — Class C | |
Six Months Ended |
February 28, 2010 | Year Ended August 31, | | Period Ended |
(Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $10.230 | $10.270 | $10.560 | $10.900 | $10.830 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.186 | $ 0.369 | $ 0.368 | $ 0.351 | $ 0.138 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.345 | (0.035) | (0.259) | | (0.291) | 0.089 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.531 | $ 0.334 | $ 0.109 | $ 0.060 | $ 0.227 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.181) | $ (0.374) | $ (0.354) | $ (0.352) | $ (0.157) |
From net realized gain | — | — | (0.045) | | (0.048) | — |
Total distributions | $ (0.181) | $ (0.374) | $ (0.399) | $ (0.400) | $ (0.157) |
Net asset value — End of period | $10.580 | $10.230 | $10.270 | $10.560 | $10.900 |
Total Return(3) | 5.21%(4) | 3.55% | 1.03% | | 0.51% | 2.13%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 2,090 | $ 1,562 | $ 958 | $ 1,285 | $ 598 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.47%(5) | 1.55% | 1.51% | | 1.50%(6) | 1.50%(5) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | 0.02%(5) | 0.05% | 0.11% | | 0.16% | 0.09%(5) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.49%(5) | 1.60% | 1.62% | | 1.66%(6) | 1.59%(5) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.47%(5) | 1.54% | 1.49% | | 1.49%(6) | 1.48%(5) |
Net investment income | 3.56%(5) | 3.82% | 3.48% | | 3.23% | 2.85%(5) |
Portfolio Turnover | 8%(4) | 22% | 12% | | 29% | 31%(8) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, March 21, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(8) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
85 |
| | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | |
|
| | Alabama Fund — Class I | |
| Six Months Ended | | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 | August 31, 2008(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.300 | $ 9.340 | $ 9.040 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.213 | $ 0.419 | $ 0.209 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.314 | (0.035) | 0.300 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.527 | $ 0.384 | $ 0.509 |
|
Less Distributions | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.207) | $(0.424) | $(0.209) |
Total distributions | $(0.207) | $(0.424) | $(0.209) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.620 | $ 9.300 | $ 9.340 |
Total Return(3) | 5.70%(4) | 4.51% | 5.64%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 4,483 | $ 3,343 | $ 3,958 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 0.52%(5) | 0.60% | 0.56%(5) |
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.02%(5) | 0.05% | 0.11%(5) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 0.54%(5) | 0.65% | 0.67%(5) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 0.52%(5) | 0.59% | 0.54%(5) |
Net investment income | 4.50%(5) | 4.79% | 4.47%(5) |
Portfolio Turnover | 8%(4) | 22% | 12%(7) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(7) | For the year ended August 31, 2008. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
86 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Arkansas Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.870 | $ 9.160 | $ 9.710 | $ 9.970 | $ 9.870 | $ 9.880 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.189 | $ 0.392 | $ 0.415 | $ 0.419 | $ 0.438 | $ 0.460 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.286 | (0.278) | (0.540) | | (0.254) | 0.100 | (0.002) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.475 | $ 0.114 | $ (0.125) | $ 0.165 | $ 0.538 | $ 0.458 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.185) | $ (0.404) | $ (0.425) | $ (0.425) | $ (0.438) | $ (0.468) |
Total distributions | $ (0.185) | $ (0.404) | $ (0.425) | $ (0.425) | $ (0.438) | $ (0.468) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.160 | $ 8.870 | $ 9.160 | $ 9.710 | $ 9.970 | $ 9.870 |
Total Return(2) | | 5.39%(3) | 1.55% | (1.21)% | | 1.61% | 5.61% | 4.74% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $63,386 | $59,111 | $56,405 | $57,319 | $46,779 | $36,014 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.73%(4) | 0.78% | 0.76% | | 0.75%(5) | 0.74% | 0.74%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | 0.01%(4) | 0.05% | 0.14% | | 0.20% | 0.21% | 0.13%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.74%(4) | 0.83% | 0.90% | | 0.95%(5) | 0.95% | 0.87%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.73%(4) | 0.78% | 0.73% | | 0.72%(5) | 0.71% | 0.73%(6) |
Net investment income | | 4.18%(4) | 4.71% | 4.37% | | 4.19% | 4.46% | 4.65% |
Portfolio Turnover | | 5%(3) | 18% | 15% | | 26% | 18% | 14% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
87 |
| | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | |
|
| | | Arkansas Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.530 | $ 9.850 | $10.430 | $10.710 | $10.610 | $10.610 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.167 | $ 0.356 | $ 0.371 | $ 0.372 | $ 0.393 | $ 0.416 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.308 | (0.311) | (0.573) | | (0.275) | 0.098 | 0.007 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.475 | $ 0.045 | $ (0.202) | $ 0.097 | $ 0.491 | $ 0.423 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.165) | $(0.365) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.377) | $ (0.391) | $ (0.423) |
Total distributions | $(0.165) | $(0.365) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.377) | $ (0.391) | $ (0.423) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.840 | $ 9.530 | $ 9.850 | $10.430 | $10.710 | $10.610 |
Total Return(2) | 5.00%(3) | 0.80% | (1.97)% | | 0.85% | 4.75% | 4.23%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 3,614 | $ 3,525 | $ 4,157 | $ 5,413 | $ 8,166 | $ 8,924 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.48%(5) | 1.53% | 1.50% | | 1.50%(6) | 1.50% | 1.49%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.01%(5) | 0.05% | 0.14% | | 0.20% | 0.21% | 0.13%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.49%(5) | 1.58% | 1.64% | | 1.70%(6) | 1.71% | 1.62%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.48%(5) | 1.53% | 1.48% | | 1.47%(6) | 1.46% | 1.48%(7) |
Net investment income | 3.43%(5) | 3.98% | 3.63% | | 3.47% | 3.72% | 3.92% |
Portfolio Turnover | 5%(3) | 18% | 15% | | 26% | 18% | 14% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.17% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
88 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | | Arkansas Fund — Class C | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | | | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.530 | $ 9.850 | $10.420 | $10.710 | $10.550 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.165 | $ 0.354 | $ 0.369 | $ 0.364 | $ 0.112 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.310 | (0.309) | (0.562) | | (0.277) | 0.177 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.475 | $ 0.045 | $ (0.193) | $ 0.087 | $ 0.289 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.165) | $(0.365) | $ (0.377) | $ (0.377) | $ (0.129) |
Total distributions | $(0.165) | $(0.365) | $ (0.377) | $ (0.377) | $ (0.129) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.840 | $ 9.530 | $ 9.850 | $10.420 | $10.710 |
Total Return(3) | 5.00%(4) | 0.80% | (1.88)% | | 0.76% | 2.76%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 5,186 | $ 3,386 | $ 2,989 | $ 2,756 | $ 638 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.48%(5) | 1.53% | 1.52% | | 1.50%(6) | 1.49%(5) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | 0.01%(5) | 0.05% | 0.14% | | 0.20% | 0.21%(5) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.49%(5) | 1.58% | 1.66% | | 1.70%(6) | 1.70%(5) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.48%(5) | 1.53% | 1.48% | | 1.47%(6) | 1.46%(5) |
Net investment income | 3.40%(5) | 3.95% | 3.62% | | 3.41% | 3.07%(5) |
Portfolio Turnover | 5%(4) | 18% | 15% | | 26% | 18%(8) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, April 28, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(8) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
89 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Georgia Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.500 | $ 8.730 | $ 9.130 | $ 9.460 | $ 9.510 | $ 9.480 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.199 | $ 0.391 | $ 0.393 | $ 0.393 | $ 0.420 | $ 0.448 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.262 | (0.229) | (0.399) | | (0.321) | (0.044) | 0.039 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.461 | $ 0.162 | $ (0.006) | $ 0.072 | $ 0.376 | $ 0.487 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.191) | $ (0.392) | $ (0.394) | $ (0.402) | $ (0.426) | $ (0.457) |
Total distributions | $ (0.191) | $ (0.392) | $ (0.394) | $ (0.402) | $ (0.426) | $ (0.457) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 8.770 | $ 8.500 | $ 8.730 | $ 9.130 | $ 9.460 | $ 9.510 |
Total Return(2) | | 5.46%(3) | 2.30% | (0.07)% | | 0.71% | 4.10% | 5.25% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $63,050 | $63,387 | $68,832 | $69,269 | $49,431 | $42,511 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.74%(4) | 0.83% | 0.77% | | 0.76%(5) | 0.75% | 0.77%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | 0.09%(4) | 0.18% | 0.21% | | 0.29% | 0.45% | 0.34%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.83%(4) | 1.01% | 0.98% | | 1.05%(5) | 1.20% | 1.11%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.74%(4) | 0.81% | 0.74% | | 0.71%(5) | 0.73% | 0.75%(6) |
Net investment income | | 4.59%(4) | 4.92% | 4.37% | | 4.18% | 4.49% | 4.71% |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio(8) | | — | — | — | | — | — | 2% |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | 9%(3) | 18% | 34% | | 12% | 20% | 11% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(8) | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
90 |
| | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | |
|
| | | Georgia Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.080 | $ 9.320 | $ 9.750 | $10.100 | $10.150 | $10.130 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.178 | $ 0.354 | $ 0.348 | $ 0.347 | $ 0.375 | $ 0.404 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.284 | (0.241) | (0.433) | | (0.343) | (0.046) | 0.028 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.462 | $ 0.113 | $(0.085) | $ 0.004 | $ 0.329 | $ 0.432 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.172) | $(0.353) | $(0.345) | $ (0.354) | $ (0.379) | $ (0.412) |
Total distributions | $(0.172) | $(0.353) | $(0.345) | $ (0.354) | $ (0.379) | $ (0.412) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.370 | $ 9.080 | $ 9.320 | $ 9.750 | $10.100 | $10.150 |
Total Return(2) | 5.11%(3) | 1.45% | (0.78)% | | (0.02)% | 3.35% | 4.52%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 5,914 | $ 6,387 | $ 8,301 | $11,363 | $13,382 | $15,075 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.49%(5) | 1.57% | 1.52% | | 1.51%(6) | 1.50% | 1.52%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.09%(5) | 0.18% | 0.21% | | 0.29% | 0.45% | 0.34%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.58%(5) | 1.75% | 1.73% | | 1.80%(6) | 1.95% | 1.86%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.49%(5) | 1.56% | 1.49% | | 1.46%(6) | 1.48% | 1.50%(7) |
Net investment income | 3.84%(5) | 4.18% | 3.62% | | 3.44% | 3.75% | 3.98% |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio(9) | — | — | — | | — | — | 2% |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | 9%(3) | 18% | 34% | | 12% | 20% | 11% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.18% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(9) | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
91 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | | Georgia Fund — Class C | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | | | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.090 | $ 9.330 | $ 9.760 | $10.100 | $ 9.980 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.178 | $ 0.354 | $ 0.345 | $ 0.342 | $ 0.116 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.285 | (0.241) | (0.429) | | (0.328) | 0.133(3) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.463 | $ 0.113 | $(0.084) | $ 0.014 | $ 0.249 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.173) | $(0.353) | $(0.346) | $ (0.354) | $(0.129) |
Total distributions | $(0.173) | $(0.353) | $(0.346) | $ (0.354) | $ (0.129) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.380 | $ 9.090 | $ 9.330 | $ 9.760 | $10.100 |
Total Return(4) | 5.11%(5) | 1.56% | (0.88)% | | 0.08% | 2.52%(5) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 9,349 | $ 8,190 | $ 7,688 | $ 6,318 | $ 1,185 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.49%(6) | 1.57% | 1.53% | | 1.51%(7) | 1.50%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.09%(6) | 0.18% | 0.21% | | 0.29% | 0.45%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.58%(6) | 1.75% | 1.74% | | 1.80%(7) | 1.95%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.49%(6) | 1.56% | 1.49% | | 1.46%(7) | 1.48%(6) |
Net investment income | 3.84%(6) | 4.16% | 3.60% | | 3.41% | 3.28%(6) |
Portfolio Turnover | 9%(5) | 18% | 34% | | 12% | 20%(9) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, April 25, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(4) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(5) | Not annualized. |
(6) | Annualized. |
(7) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(9) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
92 |
| | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | |
|
| | Georgia Fund — Class I | |
| Six Months Ended | | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 | August 31, 2008(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.520 | $ 8.750 | $ 8.400 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.209 | $ 0.407 | $ 0.208 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.271 | (0.228) | 0.347 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.480 | $ 0.179 | $ 0.555 |
|
Less Distributions | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.200) | $(0.409) | $(0.205) |
Total distributions | $(0.200) | $(0.409) | $(0.205) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 8.800 | $ 8.520 | $ 8.750 |
Total Return(3) | 5.67%(4) | 2.51% | 6.62%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 7,677 | $ 6,555 | $ 4,579 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 0.55%(5) | 0.62% | 0.58%(5) |
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.09%(5) | 0.18% | 0.21%(5) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 0.64%(5) | 0.80% | 0.79%(5) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 0.55%(5) | 0.61% | 0.55%(5) |
Net investment income | 4.81%(5) | 5.12% | 4.75%(5) |
Portfolio Turnover | 9%(4) | 18% | 34%(7) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(7) | For the year ended August 31, 2008. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
93 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Kentucky Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.410 | $ 8.610 | $ 8.970 | $ 9.240 | $ 9.320 | $ 9.320 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.191 | $ 0.382 | $ 0.386 | $ 0.399 | $ 0.400 | $ 0.424 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.344 | (0.200) | (0.359) | | (0.277) | (0.074) | 0.005(2) |
Total income from operations | $ 0.535 | $ 0.182 | $ 0.027 | $ 0.122 | $ 0.326 | $ 0.429 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.185) | $ (0.382) | $ (0.387) | $ (0.392) | $ (0.406) | $ (0.429) |
Total distributions | $ (0.185) | $ (0.382) | $ (0.387) | $ (0.392) | $ (0.406) | $ (0.429) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 8.760 | $ 8.410 | $ 8.610 | $ 8.970 | $ 9.240 | $ 9.320 |
Total Return(3) | | 6.41%(4) | 2.44% | 0.29% | | 1.31% | 3.63% | 4.71% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $48,966 | $46,662 | $49,880 | $50,736 | $52,188 | $50,371 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.72%(5) | 0.78% | 0.77% | | 0.78%(6) | 0.79% | 0.77%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | | — | — | 0.03% | | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.05%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.72%(5) | 0.78% | 0.80% | | 0.84%(6) | 0.85% | 0.82%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.72%(5) | 0.77% | 0.75% | | 0.76%(6) | 0.76% | 0.75%(7) |
Net investment income | | 4.44%(5) | 4.75% | 4.35% | | 4.35% | 4.37% | 4.56% |
Portfolio Turnover | | 1%(4) | 15% | 19% | | 14% | 11% | 22% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
94 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | | Kentucky Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.080 | $ 9.300 | $ 9.680 | $ 9.970 | $10.050 | $10.060 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.171 | $ 0.347 | $ 0.345 | $ 0.356 | $ 0.359 | $ 0.384 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.376 | (0.222) | (0.383) | (0.298) | (0.076) | (0.007) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.547 | $ 0.125 | $(0.038) | $ 0.058 | $ 0.283 | $ 0.377 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.167) | $(0.345) | $(0.342) | $(0.348) | $ (0.363) | $ (0.387) |
Total distributions | $(0.167) | $(0.345) | $(0.342) | $(0.348) | $ (0.363) | $ (0.387) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.460 | $ 9.080 | $ 9.300 | $ 9.680 | $ 9.970 | $10.050 |
Total Return(2) | 6.06%(3) | 1.60% | (0.41)% | 0.56% | 2.92% | 3.99%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 3,876 | $ 4,186 | $ 6,236 | $ 8,050 | $10,122 | $13,305 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.47%(5) | 1.53% | 1.52% | 1.53%(6) | 1.54% | 1.52%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | — | — | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.05%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.47%(5) | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.59%(6) | 1.60% | 1.57%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.47%(5) | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.51%(6) | 1.51% | 1.50%(7) |
Net investment income | 3.69%(5) | 4.01% | 3.60% | 3.60% | 3.63% | 3.82% |
Portfolio Turnover | 1%(3) | 15% | 19% | 14% | 11% | 22% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.17% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
95 |
| | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | |
|
| | | Kentucky Fund — Class C | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.090 | $ 9.300 | $ 9.680 | $ 9.970 | $ 9.940 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.171 | $ 0.348 | $ 0.346 | $ 0.354 | $ 0.147 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.366 | (0.213) | (0.384) | (0.296) | 0.037(3) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.537 | $ 0.135 | $(0.038) | $ 0.058 | $ 0.184 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.167) | $(0.345) | $(0.342) | $(0.348) | $ (0.154) |
Total distributions | $(0.167) | $(0.345) | $(0.342) | $(0.348) | $ (0.154) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.460 | $ 9.090 | $ 9.300 | $ 9.680 | $ 9.970 |
Total Return(4) | 5.94%(5) | 1.71% | (0.41)% | 0.56% | 1.89%(5) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 2,381 | $ 2,509 | $ 2,189 | $ 1,994 | $ 297 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.47%(6) | 1.53% | 1.52% | 1.53%(7) | 1.54%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | — | — | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.06%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.47%(6) | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.59%(7) | 1.60%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.47%(6) | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.51%(7) | 1.51%(6) |
Net investment income | 3.69%(6) | 4.00% | 3.62% | 3.59% | 3.37%(6) |
Portfolio Turnover | 1%(5) | 15% | 19% | 14% | 11%(9) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, March 23, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(4) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(5) | Not annualized. |
(6) | Annualized. |
(7) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(9) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
96 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Louisiana Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.960 | $ 9.170 | $ 9.660 | $ 9.960 | $ 9.960 | $ 9.840 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.219 | $ 0.428 | $ 0.423 | $ 0.425 | $ 0.449 | $ 0.460 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.319 | (0.213) | (0.484) | | (0.285) | — | 0.123 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.538 | $ 0.215 | $ (0.061) | $ 0.140 | $ 0.449 | $ 0.583 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.208) | $ (0.425) | $ (0.429) | $ (0.440) | $ (0.449) | $ (0.463) |
Total distributions | $ (0.208) | $ (0.425) | $ (0.429) | $ (0.440) | $ (0.449) | $ (0.463) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.290 | $ 8.960 | $ 9.170 | $ 9.660 | $ 9.960 | $ 9.960 |
Total Return(2) | | 6.03%(3) | 2.85% | (0.65)% | | 1.36% | 4.66% | 6.04% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $36,184 | $37,019 | $41,310 | $40,323 | $26,972 | $22,317 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.69%(4) | 0.76% | 0.72% | | 0.72%(5) | 0.71% | 0.76%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | 0.01%(4) | 0.04% | 0.15% | | 0.26% | 0.26% | 0.14%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.70%(4) | 0.80% | 0.87% | | 0.98%(5) | 0.97% | 0.90%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.69%(4) | 0.75% | 0.70% | | 0.67%(5) | 0.68% | 0.75%(6) |
Net investment income | | 4.77%(4) | 5.15% | 4.46% | | 4.28% | 4.57% | 4.63% |
Portfolio Turnover | | 6%(3) | 30% | 22% | | 19% | 30% | 12% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
97 |
| | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | |
|
| | | Louisiana Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.480 | $ 9.690 | $10.210 | $10.530 | $10.520 | $10.400 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.195 | $ 0.386 | $ 0.373 | $ 0.374 | $ 0.399 | $ 0.411 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.331 | (0.215) | (0.519) | | (0.309) | 0.006 | 0.120 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.526 | $ 0.171 | $ (0.146) | $ 0.065 | $ 0.405 | $ 0.531 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.186) | $(0.381) | $ (0.374) | $ (0.385) | $ (0.395) | $ (0.411) |
Total distributions | $(0.186) | $(0.381) | $ (0.374) | $ (0.385) | $ (0.395) | $ (0.411) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.820 | $ 9.480 | $ 9.690 | $10.210 | $10.530 | $10.520 |
Total Return(2) | 5.57%(3) | 2.18% | (1.46)% | | 0.57% | 3.97% | 5.36%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 1,722 | $ 2,471 | $ 3,891 | $ 4,487 | $ 6,124 | $ 8,285 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.44%(5) | 1.51% | 1.47% | | 1.47%(6) | 1.47% | 1.51%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.01%(5) | 0.04% | 0.15% | | 0.26% | 0.26% | 0.14%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.45%(5) | 1.55% | 1.62% | | 1.73%(6) | 1.73% | 1.65%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.44%(5) | 1.50% | 1.45% | | 1.42%(6) | 1.44% | 1.50%(7) |
Net investment income | 4.00%(5) | 4.42% | 3.71% | | 3.56% | 3.84% | 3.91% |
Portfolio Turnover | 6%(3) | 30% | 22% | | 19% | 30% | 12% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.17% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
98 |
| | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | |
|
| | Louisiana Fund — Class C | |
| Six Months Ended | | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 | August 31, 2008(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.490 | $ 9.710 | $10.230 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.196 | $ 0.388 | $ 0.286 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.340 | (0.227) | (0.528) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.536 | $ 0.161 | $ (0.242) |
|
Less Distributions | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.186) | $(0.381) | $ (0.278) |
Total distributions | $(0.186) | $(0.381) | $ (0.278) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.840 | $ 9.490 | $ 9.710 |
Total Return(3) | 5.67%(4) | 2.18% | (2.47)%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 1,772 | $ 1,677 | $ 240 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.44%(5) | 1.50% | 1.47%(5) |
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.01%(5) | 0.04% | 0.15%(5) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.45%(5) | 1.54% | 1.62%(5) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.44%(5) | 1.50% | 1.44%(5) |
Net investment income | 4.03%(5) | 4.35% | 3.90%(5) |
Portfolio Turnover | 6%(4) | 30% | 22%(7) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, December 4, 2007, to August 31, 2008. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(7) | For the year ended August 31, 2008. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
99 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Maryland Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.670 | $ 8.900 | $ 9.260 | $ 9.620 | $ 9.590 | $ 9.490 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.198 | $ 0.403 | $ 0.404 | $ 0.411 | $ 0.454 | $ 0.442 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.315 | (0.226) | (0.348) | | (0.347) | 0.005 | 0.094 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.513 | $ 0.177 | $ 0.056 | $ 0.064 | $ 0.459 | $ 0.536 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.193) | $ (0.407) | $ (0.416) | $ (0.424) | $ (0.429) | $ (0.436) |
Total distributions | $ (0.193) | $ (0.407) | $ (0.416) | $ (0.424) | $ (0.429) | $ (0.436) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 8.990 | $ 8.670 | $ 8.900 | $ 9.260 | $ 9.620 | $ 9.590 |
Total Return(2) | | 5.95%(3) | 2.43% | 0.60% | | 0.59% | 4.94% | 5.77% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $75,541 | $75,555 | $81,774 | $75,025 | $55,380 | $45,791 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.77%(4) | 0.82% | 0.77% | | 0.78%(5) | 0.79% | 0.80%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | 0.03%(4) | 0.10% | 0.23% | | 0.41% | 0.76% | 0.28%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.80%(4) | 0.92% | 1.00% | | 1.19%(5) | 1.55% | 1.08%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.77%(4) | 0.81% | 0.74% | | 0.73%(5) | 0.76% | 0.79%(6) |
Net investment income | | 4.45%(4) | 4.97% | 4.41% | | 4.29% | 4.78% | 4.64% |
Portfolio Turnover | | 5%(3) | 16% | 15% | | 6% | 15% | 10% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
100 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | | Maryland Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.460 | $ 9.700 | $10.090 | $10.490 | $10.460 | $10.350 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.179 | $ 0.374 | $ 0.368 | $ 0.373 | $ 0.419 | $ 0.405 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.349 | (0.239) | (0.382) | (0.388) | 0.002 | 0.103 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.528 | $ 0.135 | $ (0.014) | $ (0.015) | $ 0.421 | $ 0.508 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.178) | $(0.375) | $ (0.376) | $ (0.385) | $ (0.391) | $ (0.398) |
Total distributions | $(0.178) | $(0.375) | $ (0.376) | $ (0.385) | $ (0.391) | $ (0.398) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.810 | $ 9.460 | $ 9.700 | $10.090 | $10.490 | $10.460 |
Total Return(2) | 5.60%(3) | 1.76% | (0.15)% | (0.22)% | 4.14% | 5.17%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 7,033 | $ 7,742 | $10,140 | $12,995 | $17,178 | $19,783 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.52%(5) | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.53%(6) | 1.54% | 1.55%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.03%(5) | 0.10% | 0.23% | 0.41% | 0.76% | 0.28%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.55%(5) | 1.68% | 1.75% | 1.94%(6) | 2.30% | 1.83%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.52%(5) | 1.56% | 1.48% | 1.48%(6) | 1.51% | 1.54%(7) |
Net investment income | 3.69%(5) | 4.23% | 3.67% | 3.56% | 4.05% | 3.90% |
Portfolio Turnover | 5%(3) | 16% | 15% | 6% | 15% | 10% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.17% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
101 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | | Maryland Fund — Class C | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | | | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.460 | $ 9.710 | $10.090 | $10.470 | $10.340 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.179 | $ 0.373 | $ 0.364 | $ 0.366 | $ 0.115 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.349 | (0.248) | (0.368) | | (0.361) | 0.146 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.528 | $ 0.125 | $ (0.004) | $ 0.005 | $ 0.261 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.178) | $ (0.375) | $ (0.376) | $ (0.385) | $ (0.131) |
Total distributions | $ (0.178) | $ (0.375) | $ (0.376) | $ (0.385) | $ (0.131) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.810 | $ 9.460 | $ 9.710 | $10.090 | $10.470 |
Total Return(3) | 5.60%(4) | 1.65% | (0.05)% | | (0.03)% | 2.54%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $13,833 | $12,388 | $ 9,790 | $ 6,878 | $ 342 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.52%(5) | 1.57% | 1.53% | | 1.53%(6) | 1.54%(5) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | 0.03%(5) | 0.10% | 0.23% | | 0.41% | 0.76%(5) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.55%(5) | 1.67% | 1.76% | | 1.94%(6) | 2.30%(5) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.52%(5) | 1.56% | 1.49% | | 1.48%(6) | 1.51%(5) |
Net investment income | 3.69%(5) | 4.20% | 3.65% | | 3.53% | 3.31%(5) |
Portfolio Turnover | 5%(4) | 16% | 15% | | 6% | 15%(8) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, May 2, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(8) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
102 |
| | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | |
|
| | Maryland Fund — Class I | |
| Six Months Ended | | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 | August 31, 2008(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.680 | $ 8.900 | $ 8.600 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.205 | $ 0.419 | $ 0.206 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.326 | (0.216) | 0.310 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.531 | $ 0.203 | $ 0.516 |
|
Less Distributions | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.201) | $(0.423) | $(0.216) |
Total distributions | $(0.201) | $(0.423) | $(0.216) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.010 | $ 8.680 | $ 8.900 |
Total Return(3) | 6.15%(4) | 2.75% | 6.01%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 4,403 | $ 448 | $ 85 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 0.57%(5) | 0.61% | 0.58%(5) |
Interest and fee expense(6) | 0.03%(5) | 0.10% | 0.23%(5) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 0.60%(5) | 0.71% | 0.81%(5) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 0.57%(5) | 0.61% | 0.54%(5) |
Net investment income | 4.60%(5) | 5.16% | 4.60%(5) |
Portfolio Turnover | 5%(4) | 16% | 15%(7) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(7) | For the year ended August 31, 2008. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
103 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Missouri Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.080 | $ 9.370 | $ 9.750 | $10.120 | $10.180 | $10.080 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.193 | $ 0.389 | $ 0.406 | $ 0.415 | $ 0.441 | $ 0.462 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.276 | (0.288) | (0.377) | | (0.368) | (0.058) | 0.116 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.469 | $ 0.101 | $ 0.029 | $ 0.047 | $ 0.383 | $ 0.578 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.179) | $ (0.391) | $ (0.409) | $ (0.417) | $ (0.443) | $ (0.478) |
Total distributions | $ (0.179) | $ (0.391) | $ (0.409) | $ (0.417) | $ (0.443) | $ (0.478) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.370 | $ 9.080 | $ 9.370 | $ 9.750 | $10.120 | $10.180 |
Total Return(2) | | 5.19%(3) | 1.41% | 0.29% | | 0.41% | 3.91% | 5.87% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $90,988 | $89,556 | $94,078 | $90,059 | $64,947 | $55,806 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.74%(4) | 0.80% | 0.76% | | 0.75%(5) | 0.75% | 0.79%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | 0.02%(4) | 0.04% | 0.08% | | 0.17% | 0.27% | 0.21%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.76%(4) | 0.84% | 0.84% | | 0.92%(5) | 1.02% | 1.00%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.74%(4) | 0.79% | 0.74% | | 0.71%(5) | 0.71% | 0.76%(6) |
Net investment income | | 4.18%(4) | 4.51% | 4.21% | | 4.12% | 4.41% | 4.58% |
Portfolio Turnover | | 4%(3) | 21% | 18% | | 20% | 27% | 6% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
104 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | | Missouri Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $10.040 | $10.360 | $10.770 | $11.180 | $11.250 | $11.140 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.175 | $ 0.359 | $ 0.370 | $ 0.377 | $ 0.407 | $ 0.429 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.296 | (0.320) | (0.410) | (0.409) | (0.071) | 0.125 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.471 | $ 0.039 | $ (0.040) | $ (0.032) | $ 0.336 | $ 0.554 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.161) | $ (0.359) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.406) | $ (0.444) |
Total distributions | $ (0.161) | $ (0.359) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.406) | $ (0.444) |
Net asset value — End of period | $10.350 | $10.040 | $10.360 | $10.770 | $11.180 | $11.250 |
Total Return(2) | 4.71%(3) | 0.64% | (0.39)% | (0.35)% | 3.10% | 5.26%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 5,419 | $ 6,542 | $ 7,404 | $ 9,626 | $11,169 | $13,142 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.49%(5) | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.50%(6) | 1.50% | 1.54%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.02%(5) | 0.04% | 0.08% | 0.17% | 0.27% | 0.21%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.51%(5) | 1.59% | 1.59% | 1.67%(6) | 1.77% | 1.75%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.49%(5) | 1.54% | 1.49% | 1.46%(6) | 1.46% | 1.51%(7) |
Net investment income | 3.42%(5) | 3.77% | 3.47% | 3.38% | 3.68% | 3.85% |
Portfolio Turnover | 4%(3) | 21% | 18% | 20% | 27% | 6% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.16% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
105 |
| | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | |
|
| | | Missouri Fund — Class C | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $10.030 | $10.350 | $10.770 | $11.170 | $11.140 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.175 | $ 0.359 | $ 0.364 | $ 0.371 | $ 0.189 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.296 | (0.320) | (0.414) | (0.393) | 0.052(3) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.471 | $ 0.039 | $ (0.050) | $ (0.022) | $ 0.241 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.161) | $ (0.359) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.211) |
Total distributions | $ (0.161) | $ (0.359) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.211) |
Net asset value — End of period | $10.340 | $10.030 | $10.350 | $10.770 | $11.170 |
Total Return(4) | 4.72%(5) | 0.64% | (0.48)% | (0.26)% | 2.20%(5) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 5,629 | $ 5,553 | $ 5,561 | $ 4,491 | $ 1,117 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.49%(6) | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.50%(7) | 1.50%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.02%(6) | 0.04% | 0.08% | 0.17% | 0.27%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.51%(6) | 1.59% | 1.60% | 1.67%(7) | 1.77%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.49%(6) | 1.54% | 1.49% | 1.46%(7) | 1.46%(6) |
Net investment income | 3.42%(6) | 3.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 3.17%(6) |
Portfolio Turnover | 4%(5) | 21% | 18% | 20% | 27%(9) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, February 16, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(4) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(5) | Not annualized. |
(6) | Annualized. |
(7) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(9) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
106 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | North Carolina Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.810 | $ 8.810 | $ 9.160 | $ 9.370 | $ 9.340 | $ 9.390 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.215 | $ 0.418 | $ 0.400 | $ 0.404 | $ 0.410 | $ 0.419 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.246 | (0.019) | (0.355) | | (0.212) | 0.025 | (0.052) |
Total income from operations | $ 0.461 | $ 0.399 | $ 0.045 | $ 0.192 | $ 0.435 | $ 0.367 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.201) | $ (0.399) | $ (0.395) | $ (0.402) | $ (0.405) | $ (0.417) |
Total distributions | $ (0.201) | $ (0.399) | $ (0.395) | $ (0.402) | $ (0.405) | $ (0.417) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.070 | $ 8.810 | $ 8.810 | $ 9.160 | $ 9.370 | $ 9.340 |
Total Return(2) | | 5.26%(3) | 4.99% | 0.49% | | 2.04% | 4.80% | 4.00% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $80,720 | $78,245 | $86,348 | $79,909 | $67,480 | $57,823 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.77%(4) | 0.82% | 0.78% | | 0.77%(5) | 0.77% | 0.79%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | 0.07%(4) | 0.11% | 0.29% | | 0.58% | 0.38% | 0.16%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.84%(4) | 0.93% | 1.07% | | 1.35%(5) | 1.15% | 0.95%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.77%(4) | 0.82% | 0.75% | | 0.74%(5) | 0.75% | 0.79%(6) |
Net investment income | | 4.79%(4) | 5.11% | 4.41% | | 4.32% | 4.43% | 4.48% |
Portfolio Turnover | | 7%(3) | 42% | 23% | | 9% | 18% | 8% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
107 |
| | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | |
|
| | North Carolina Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.480 | $ 9.470 | $ 9.850 | $10.080 | $10.040 | $10.100 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.195 | $ 0.383 | $ 0.357 | $ 0.360 | $ 0.368 | $ 0.375 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.269 | (0.011) | (0.388) | | (0.233) | 0.032 | (0.061) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.464 | $ 0.372 | $(0.031) | $ 0.127 | $ 0.400 | $ 0.314 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.184) | $(0.362) | $(0.349) | $ (0.357) | $ (0.360) | $ (0.374) |
Total distributions | $(0.184) | $(0.362) | $(0.349) | $ (0.357) | $ (0.360) | $ (0.374) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.760 | $ 9.480 | $ 9.470 | $ 9.850 | $10.080 | $10.040 |
Total Return(2) | 4.92%(3) | 4.30% | (0.33)% | | 1.23% | 4.09% | 3.32%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 4,524 | $ 5,209 | $ 6,719 | $ 8,683 | $12,145 | $15,344 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.52%(5) | 1.57% | 1.53% | | 1.52%(6) | 1.52% | 1.54%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.07%(5) | 0.11% | 0.29% | | 0.58% | 0.38% | 0.16%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.59%(5) | 1.68% | 1.82% | | 2.10%(6) | 1.90% | 1.70%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.52%(5) | 1.57% | 1.50% | | 1.49%(6) | 1.50% | 1.54%(7) |
Net investment income | 4.06%(5) | 4.37% | 3.66% | | 3.57% | 3.69% | 3.73% |
Portfolio Turnover | 7%(3) | 42% | 23% | | 9% | 18% | 8% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.16% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
108 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | North Carolina Fund — Class C | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | | | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.480 | $ 9.470 | $ 9.850 | $10.070 | $ 9.910 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.194 | $ 0.384 | $ 0.355 | $ 0.357 | $ 0.097 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.270 | (0.012) | (0.386) | | (0.220) | 0.183(3) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.464 | $ 0.372 | $(0.031) | $ 0.137 | $ 0.280 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.184) | $(0.362) | $(0.349) | $ (0.357) | $(0.120) |
Total distributions | $ (0.184) | $(0.362) | $(0.349) | $ (0.357) | $ (0.120) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.760 | $ 9.480 | $ 9.470 | $ 9.850 | $10.070 |
Total Return(4) | 4.92%(5) | 4.30% | (0.33)% | | 1.34% | 2.85%(5) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $11,231 | $ 8,734 | $ 8,073 | $ 4,880 | $ 527 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.52%(6) | 1.57% | 1.53% | | 1.51%(7) | 1.52%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.07%(6) | 0.11% | 0.29% | | 0.58% | 0.38%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.59%(6) | 1.68% | 1.82% | | 2.09%(7) | 1.90%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.52%(6) | 1.57% | 1.50% | | 1.48%(7) | 1.50%(6) |
Net investment income | 4.03%(6) | 4.36% | 3.65% | | 3.56% | 2.91%(6) |
Portfolio Turnover | 7%(5) | 42% | 23% | | 9% | 18%(9) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, May 2, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(4) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(5) | Not annualized. |
(6) | Annualized. |
(7) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(9) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
109 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | |
|
| | | North Carolina Fund — Class I | |
| Six Months Ended | | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 | August 31, 2008(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.830 | $ 8.820 | $ 8.550 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.224 | $ 0.437 | $ 0.216 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.256 | (0.010) | 0.259 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.480 | $ 0.427 | $ 0.475 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.210) | $(0.417) | $(0.205) |
Total distributions | $ (0.210) | $(0.417) | $(0.205) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.100 | $ 8.830 | $ 8.820 |
Total Return(3) | | 5.47%(4) | 5.32% | 5.56%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $14,824 | $ 8,303 | $ 950 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.57%(5) | 0.63% | 0.58%(5) |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | 0.07%(5) | 0.11% | 0.29%(5) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.64%(5) | 0.74% | 0.87%(5) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.57%(5) | 0.62% | 0.54%(5) |
Net investment income | | 4.99%(5) | 5.33% | 4.86%(5) |
Portfolio Turnover | | 7%(4) | 42% | 23%(7) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(7) | For the year ended August 31, 2008. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
110 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Oregon Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | | Year Ended August 31, | | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.510 | $ 8.720 | $ 9.260 | $ 9.550 | $ 9.460 | $ 9.480 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.205 | $ 0.399 | $ 0.410 | $ 0.411 | $ 0.443 | $ 0.470 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.224 | (0.210) | | (0.533) | (0.278) | 0.089 | (0.015) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.429 | $ 0.189 | $ (0.123) | $ 0.133 | $ 0.532 | $ 0.455 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.189) | $ (0.399) | $ (0.417) | $ (0.423) | $ (0.442) | $ (0.475) |
Total distributions | $ (0.189) | $ (0.399) | $ (0.417) | $ (0.423) | $ (0.442) | $ (0.475) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 8.750 | $ 8.510 | $ 8.720 | $ 9.260 | $ 9.550 | $ 9.460 |
Total Return(2) | 5.07%(3) | | 2.65% | | (1.36)% | 1.34% | 5.78% | 4.91% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $121,559 | $118,827 | $124,199 | $110,060 | $73,764 | $66,240 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 0.77%(4) | | 0.82% | | 0.76% | 0.78%(5) | 0.77% | 0.80%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | 0.04%(4) | | 0.12% | | 0.22% | 0.47% | 0.46% | 0.26%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 0.81%(4) | | 0.94% | | 0.98% | 1.25%(5) | 1.23% | 1.06%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 0.77%(4) | | 0.81% | | 0.74% | 0.75%(5) | 0.75% | 0.79%(6) |
Net investment income | 4.75%(4) | | 5.05% | | 4.53% | 4.31% | 4.69% | 4.96% |
Portfolio Turnover | 13%(3) | | 42% | | 34% | 42% | 15% | 27% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
111 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Oregon Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.310 | $ 9.540 | $10.120 | $10.440 | $10.340 | $10.370 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.189 | $ 0.372 | $ 0.375 | $ 0.376 | $ 0.408 | $ 0.438 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.244 | (0.233) | (0.577) | | (0.312) | 0.097 | (0.026) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.433 | $ 0.139 | $ (0.202) | $ 0.064 | $ 0.505 | $ 0.412 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.173) | $ (0.369) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.384) | $ (0.405) | $ (0.442) |
Total distributions | $ (0.173) | $ (0.369) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.384) | $ (0.405) | $ (0.442) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.570 | $ 9.310 | $ 9.540 | $10.120 | $10.440 | $10.340 |
Total Return(2) | | 4.67%(3) | 1.85% | (2.04)% | | 0.56% | 5.00% | 4.24%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $11,260 | $12,114 | $14,432 | $17,077 | $21,015 | $22,363 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 1.52%(5) | 1.56% | 1.51% | | 1.53%(6) | 1.52% | 1.55%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | | 0.04%(5) | 0.12% | 0.22% | | 0.47% | 0.46% | 0.26%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 1.56%(5) | 1.68% | 1.73% | | 2.00%(6) | 1.98% | 1.81%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 1.52%(5) | 1.56% | 1.49% | | 1.50%(6) | 1.50% | 1.54%(7) |
Net investment income | | 4.00%(5) | 4.31% | 3.77% | | 3.60% | 3.96% | 4.24% |
Portfolio Turnover | | 13%(3) | 42% | 34% | | 42% | 15% | 27% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.18% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
112 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | | Oregon Fund — Class C | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | | | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.320 | $ 9.550 | $10.130 | $10.440 | $10.400 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.189 | $ 0.371 | $ 0.373 | $ 0.368 | $ 0.172 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.244 | (0.232) | (0.575) | | (0.294) | 0.061(3) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.433 | $ 0.139 | $ (0.202) | $ 0.074 | $ 0.233 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.173) | $ (0.369) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.384) | $ (0.193) |
Total distributions | $ (0.173) | $ (0.369) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.384) | $ (0.193) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.580 | $ 9.320 | $ 9.550 | $10.130 | $10.440 |
Total Return(4) | 4.67%(5) | 1.85% | (2.03)% | | 0.66% | 2.27%(5) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $20,397 | $19,429 | $16,927 | $ 8,362 | $ 666 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.52%(6) | 1.57% | 1.52% | | 1.53%(7) | 1.52%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.04%(6) | 0.12% | 0.22% | | 0.47% | 0.46%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.56%(6) | 1.69% | 1.74% | | 2.00%(7) | 1.98%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.52%(6) | 1.56% | 1.49% | | 1.50%(7) | 1.50%(6) |
Net investment income | 4.00%(6) | 4.29% | 3.78% | | 3.54% | 3.32%(6) |
Portfolio Turnover | 13%(5) | 42% | 34% | | 42% | 15%(9) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, May 2, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(4) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(5) | Not annualized. |
(6) | Annualized. |
(7) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(9) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
113 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | South Carolina Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | | Year Ended August 31, | | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.870 | $ 9.100 | $ 9.700 | $ 10.050 | $10.060 | $ 9.710 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.205 | $ 0.405 | $ 0.420 | $ 0.409 | $ 0.423 | $ 0.463 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.231 | (0.233) | | (0.598) | (0.346) | (0.002) | 0.370 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.436 | $ 0.172 | $ (0.178) | $ 0.063 | $ 0.421 | $ 0.833 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.186) | $ (0.402) | $ (0.422) | $ (0.413) | $ (0.431) | $ (0.483) |
Total distributions | $ (0.186) | $ (0.402) | $ (0.422) | $ (0.413) | $ (0.431) | $ (0.483) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.120 | $ 8.870 | $ 9.100 | $ 9.700 | $10.050 | $10.060 |
Total Return(2) | 4.93%(3) | | 2.23% | | (1.75)% | 0.55% | 4.35% | 8.78% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $101,418 | $103,451 | $110,470 | $103,975 | $71,412 | $50,593 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 0.75%(4) | | 0.80% | | 0.77% | 0.76%(5) | 0.75% | 0.75%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | 0.02%(4) | | 0.10% | | 0.22% | 0.45% | 0.37% | 0.37%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 0.77%(4) | | 0.90% | | 0.99% | 1.21%(5) | 1.12% | 1.12%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 0.75%(4) | | 0.80% | | 0.75% | 0.73%(5) | 0.73% | 0.72%(6) |
Net investment income | 4.51%(4) | | 4.91% | | 4.44% | 4.06% | 4.28% | 4.69% |
Portfolio Turnover | 14%(3) | | 44% | | 47% | 33% | 42% | 29% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
114 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | South Carolina Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.410 | $ 9.650 | $10.280 | $10.660 | $10.670 | $10.300 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.181 | $ 0.364 | $ 0.371 | $ 0.356 | $ 0.372 | $ 0.417 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.243 | (0.246) | (0.631) | (0.378) | (0.005) | 0.387 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.424 | $ 0.118 | $ (0.260) | $ (0.022) | $ 0.367 | $ 0.804 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.164) | $(0.358) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.358) | $ (0.377) | $ (0.434) |
Total distributions | $(0.164) | $(0.358) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.358) | $ (0.377) | $ (0.434) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.670 | $ 9.410 | $ 9.650 | $10.280 | $10.660 | $10.670 |
Total Return(2) | 4.52%(3) | 1.59% | (2.56)% | (0.29)% | 3.57% | 8.16%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 8,647 | $ 9,442 | $11,316 | $14,559 | $17,667 | $18,039 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.50%(5) | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.51%(6) | 1.50% | 1.50%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.02%(5) | 0.10% | 0.22% | 0.45% | 0.37% | 0.37%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.52%(5) | 1.66% | 1.74% | 1.96%(6) | 1.87% | 1.87%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.50%(5) | 1.56% | 1.50% | 1.48%(6) | 1.48% | 1.47%(7) |
Net investment income | 3.76%(5) | 4.17% | 3.69% | 3.33% | 3.55% | 3.98% |
Portfolio Turnover | 14%(3) | 44% | 47% | 33% | 42% | 29% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.18% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
115 |
| | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | |
|
| | South Carolina Fund — Class C | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.410 | $ 9.660 | $10.280 | $10.660 | $10.470 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.181 | $ 0.364 | $ 0.369 | $ 0.349 | $ 0.218 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.243 | (0.256) | (0.619) | (0.371) | 0.199(3) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.424 | $ 0.108 | $ (0.250) | $ (0.022) | $ 0.417 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.164) | $ (0.358) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.358) | $ (0.227) |
Total distributions | $ (0.164) | $ (0.358) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.358) | $ (0.227) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.670 | $ 9.410 | $ 9.660 | $10.280 | $10.660 |
Total Return(4) | 4.51%(5) | 1.48% | (2.46)% | (0.29)% | 4.04%(5) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $26,241 | $23,022 | $20,867 | $13,623 | $ 2,272 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.50%(6) | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.51%(7) | 1.50%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.02%(6) | 0.10% | 0.22% | 0.45% | 0.37%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.52%(6) | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.96%(7) | 1.87%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.50%(6) | 1.55% | 1.50% | 1.48%(7) | 1.48%(6) |
Net investment income | 3.76%(6) | 4.15% | 3.69% | 3.29% | 3.27%(6) |
Portfolio Turnover | 14%(5) | 44% | 47% | 33% | 42%(9) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, January 12, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(4) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(5) | Not annualized. |
(6) | Annualized. |
(7) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(9) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
116 |
| | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | |
|
| | | South Carolina Fund — Class I | |
| Six Months Ended | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 | August 31, 2008(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.880 | $ 9.110 | $ 8.620 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.214 | $ 0.422 | $ 0.215 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.231 | (0.233) | 0.496 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.445 | $ 0.189 | $ 0.711 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.195) | $ (0.419) | $ (0.221) |
Total distributions | $ (0.195) | $ (0.419) | $ (0.221) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.130 | $ 8.880 | $ 9.110 |
Total Return(3) | | 5.03%(4) | | 2.56% | 8.26%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $32,597 | $23,727 | $22,826 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.56%(5) | | 0.60% | 0.55%(5) |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | 0.02%(5) | | 0.10% | 0.22%(5) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.58%(5) | | 0.70% | 0.77%(5) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.56%(5) | | 0.60% | 0.54%(5) |
Net investment income | | 4.72%(5) | | 5.11% | 4.68%(5) |
Portfolio Turnover | | 14%(4) | | 44% | 47%(7) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(7) | For the year ended August 31, 2008. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
117 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Tennessee Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.670 | $ 9.100 | $ 9.530 | $ 9.850 | $ 9.880 | $ 9.900 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.192 | $ 0.388 | $ 0.409 | $ 0.407 | $ 0.419 | $ 0.431 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.270 | (0.424) | (0.433) | | (0.318) | (0.028) | (0.001) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.462 | $ (0.036) | $ (0.024) | $ 0.089 | $ 0.391 | $ 0.430 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.182) | $ (0.394) | $ (0.406) | $ (0.409) | $ (0.421) | $ (0.450) |
Total distributions | $ (0.182) | $ (0.394) | $ (0.406) | $ (0.409) | $ (0.421) | $ (0.450) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 8.950 | $ 8.670 | $ 9.100 | $ 9.530 | $ 9.850 | $ 9.880 |
Total Return(2) | | 5.37%(3) | (0.03)% | (0.26)% | | 0.85% | 4.09% | 4.44% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $48,613 | $46,787 | $49,219 | $49,444 | $46,023 | $42,088 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.72%(4) | 0.79% | 0.74% | | 0.75%(5) | 0.73% | 0.76%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | 0.01%(4) | 0.03% | 0.09% | | 0.21% | 0.19% | 0.16%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.73%(4) | 0.82% | 0.83% | | 0.96%(5) | 0.92% | 0.92%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.72%(4) | 0.79% | 0.72% | | 0.72%(5) | 0.70% | 0.75%(6) |
Net investment income | | 4.36%(4) | 4.72% | 4.35% | | 4.15% | 4.30% | 4.36% |
Portfolio Turnover | | 8%(3) | 20% | 26% | | 20% | 16% | 13% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
118 |
| | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | |
|
| | | Tennessee Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.450 | $ 9.910 | $10.380 | $10.730 | $10.750 | $10.780 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.173 | $ 0.356 | $ 0.369 | $ 0.365 | $ 0.378 | $ 0.390 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.291 | (0.458) | (0.475) | | (0.350) | (0.020) | (0.010) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.464 | $(0.102) | $ (0.106) | $ 0.015 | $ 0.358 | $ 0.380 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.164) | $(0.358) | $ (0.364) | $ (0.365) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.410) |
Total distributions | $(0.164) | $(0.358) | $ (0.364) | $ (0.365) | $ (0.378) | $ (0.410) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.750 | $ 9.450 | $ 9.910 | $10.380 | $10.730 | $10.750 |
Total Return(2) | 4.94%(3) | (0.73)% | (1.05)% | | 0.09% | 3.43% | 3.75%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 3,615 | $ 4,069 | $ 5,247 | $ 6,215 | $ 8,638 | $10,346 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.47%(5) | 1.54% | 1.49% | | 1.50%(6) | 1.48% | 1.51%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.01%(5) | 0.03% | 0.09% | | 0.21% | 0.19% | 0.16%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.48%(5) | 1.57% | 1.58% | | 1.71%(6) | 1.67% | 1.67%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.47%(5) | 1.54% | 1.47% | | 1.47%(6) | 1.45% | 1.50%(7) |
Net investment income | 3.61%(5) | 3.99% | 3.60% | | 3.41% | 3.56% | 3.63% |
Portfolio Turnover | 8%(3) | 20% | 26% | | 20% | 16% | 13% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.16% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
119 |
| | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | |
|
| | | Tennessee | Fund — Class C | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | | | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | | 2008 | | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.440 | $ 9.910 | $10.370 | $10.720 | $10.580 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.173 | $ 0.351 | $ 0.366 | $ 0.362 | $ 0.110 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.291 | (0.463) | | (0.463) | | (0.347) | 0.156(3) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.464 | $(0.112) | $ (0.097) | $ 0.015 | $ 0.266 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.164) | $(0.358) | $ (0.363) | $ (0.365) | $ (0.126) |
Total distributions | $(0.164) | $(0.358) | $ (0.363) | $ (0.365) | $ (0.126) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.740 | $ 9.440 | $ 9.910 | $10.370 | $10.720 |
Total Return(4) | 4.94%(5) | (0.83)% | | (0.95)% | | 0.09% | 2.54%(5) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 7,315 | $ 6,004 | $ 4,078 | $ 2,683 | $ 559 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.46%(6) | 1.54% | | 1.50% | | 1.49%(7) | 1.48%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.01%(6) | 0.03% | | 0.09% | | 0.21% | 0.19%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.47%(6) | 1.57% | | 1.59% | | 1.70%(7) | 1.67%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.46%(6) | 1.54% | | 1.47% | | 1.46%(7) | 1.45%(6) |
Net investment income | 3.60%(6) | 3.93% | | 3.59% | | 3.40% | 3.10%(6) |
Portfolio Turnover | 8%(5) | 20% | | 26% | | 20% | 16%(9) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, May 2, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(4) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(5) | Not annualized. |
(6) | Annualized. |
(7) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(9) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
120 |
| | | | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | Virginia Fund — Class A | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | | Year Ended August 31, | | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.360 | $ 8.690 | $ 9.280 | $ 9.770 | $ 9.790 | $ 9.590 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.200 | $ 0.391 | $ 0.412 | $ 0.403 | $ 0.418 | $ 0.426 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.271 | (0.327) | | (0.592) | (0.485) | (0.025) | 0.202 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.471 | $ 0.064 | $ (0.180) | $ (0.082) | $ 0.393 | $ 0.628 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.181) | $ (0.394) | $ (0.410) | $ (0.408) | $ (0.413) | $ (0.428) |
Total distributions | $ (0.181) | $ (0.394) | $ (0.410) | $ (0.408) | $ (0.413) | $ (0.428) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 8.650 | $ 8.360 | $ 8.690 | $ 9.280 | $ 9.770 | $ 9.790 |
Total Return(2) | 5.67%(3) | | 1.27% | | (2.00)% | (0.95)% | 4.16% | 6.70% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $104,434 | $105,788 | $107,673 | $107,632 | $89,098 | $78,848 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 0.76%(4) | | 0.83% | | 0.78% | 0.78%(5) | 0.77% | 0.80%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(7) | 0.04%(4) | | 0.12% | | 0.37% | 0.57% | 0.54% | 0.23%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 0.80%(4) | | 0.95% | | 1.15% | 1.35%(5) | 1.31% | 1.03%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 0.76%(4) | | 0.82% | | 0.76% | 0.76%(5) | 0.76% | 0.79%(6) |
Net investment income | 4.68%(4) | | 5.06% | | 4.53% | 4.14% | 4.34% | 4.41% |
Portfolio Turnover | 2%(3) | | 32% | | 26% | 28% | 30% | 47% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Annualized. |
(5) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(6) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(7) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
121 |
| | | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | | |
|
| | | Virginia Fund — Class B | | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | | Year Ended August 31, | |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.250 | $ 9.620 | $10.270 | $10.820 | $10.830 | $10.610 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income(1) | $ 0.185 | $ 0.370 | $ 0.381 | $ 0.367 | $ 0.384 | $ 0.392 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.303 | (0.370) | (0.656) | (0.547) | (0.018) | 0.222 |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.488 | $ — | $ (0.275) | $ (0.180) | $ 0.366 | $ 0.614 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | $(0.168) | $(0.370) | $ (0.375) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.376) | $ (0.394) |
Total distributions | $(0.168) | $(0.370) | $ (0.375) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.376) | $ (0.394) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.570 | $ 9.250 | $ 9.620 | $10.270 | $10.820 | $10.830 |
Total Return(2) | 5.30%(3) | 0.43% | (2.73)% | (1.77)% | 3.49% | 6.06%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $ 8,201 | $ 9,863 | $14,451 | $19,055 | $24,411 | $29,456 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.51%(5) | 1.58% | 1.53% | 1.53%(6) | 1.52% | 1.55%(7) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.04%(5) | 0.12% | 0.37% | 0.57% | 0.54% | 0.23%(7) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.55%(5) | 1.70% | 1.90% | 2.10%(6) | 2.06% | 1.78%(7) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.51%(5) | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.51%(6) | 1.51% | 1.54%(7) |
Net investment income | 3.92%(5) | 4.34% | 3.78% | 3.40% | 3.61% | 3.67% |
Portfolio Turnover | 2%(3) | 32% | 26% | 28% | 30% | 47% |
(1) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(3) | Not annualized. |
(4) | Total return reflects an increase of 0.16% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(7) | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
122 |
| | | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | | |
|
| | | Virginia Fund — Class C | |
| Six Months Ended | | | | |
| February 28, 2010 | | Year Ended August 31, | | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | August 31, 2006(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 9.260 | $ 9.630 | $10.280 | $10.810 | $10.660 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.186 | $ 0.368 | $ 0.381 | $ 0.365 | $ 0.198 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.303 | (0.368) | (0.656) | (0.525) | 0.158(3) |
Total income (loss) from operations | $ 0.489 | $ — | $ (0.275) | $ (0.160) | $ 0.356 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.169) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.375) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.206) |
Total distributions | $ (0.169) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.375) | $ (0.370) | $ (0.206) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 9.580 | $ 9.260 | $ 9.630 | $10.280 | $10.810 |
Total Return(4) | 5.30%(5) | 0.43% | (2.73)% | (1.58)% | 3.38%(5) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $13,507 | $12,287 | $ 9,451 | $ 5,236 | $ 548 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | 1.51%(6) | 1.59% | 1.53% | 1.53%(7) | 1.52%(6) |
Interest and fee expense(8) | 0.04%(6) | 0.12% | 0.37% | 0.57% | 0.54%(6) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | 1.55%(6) | 1.71% | 1.90% | 2.10%(7) | 2.06%(6) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | 1.51%(6) | 1.58% | 1.51% | 1.51%(7) | 1.51%(6) |
Net investment income | 3.92%(6) | 4.29% | 3.80% | 3.40% | 3.31%(6) |
Portfolio Turnover | 2%(5) | 32% | 26% | 28% | 30%(9) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, February 8, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(4) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
(5) | Not annualized. |
(6) | Annualized. |
(7) | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
(8) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(9) | For the year ended August 31, 2006. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
123 |
| | | | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S C O N T ’ D | | | |
F i n a n c i a l H i g h l i g h t s | | | | |
|
| | | Virginia Fund — Class I | |
| Six Months Ended | | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended | Period Ended |
| (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 | August 31, 2008(1) |
Net asset value — Beginning of period | $ 8.370 | $ 8.710 | $ 8.440 |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations | | | | |
Net investment income(2) | $ 0.209 | $ 0.403 | $ 0.222 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | 0.280 | (0.332) | 0.263 |
Total income from operations | $ 0.489 | $ 0.071 | $ 0.485 |
|
Less Distributions | | | | |
From net investment income | $ (0.189) | $(0.411) | $(0.215) |
Total distributions | $ (0.189) | $(0.411) | $(0.215) |
Net asset value — End of period | $ 8.670 | $ 8.370 | $ 8.710 |
Total Return(3) | | 5.88%(4) | 1.36% | 5.73%(4) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | $17,943 | $ 9,945 | $ 1,338 |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | 0.56%(5) | 0.64% | 0.63%(5) |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | 0.04%(5) | 0.12% | 0.37%(5) |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | 0.60%(5) | 0.76% | 1.00%(5) |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | 0.56%(5) | 0.63% | 0.56%(5) |
Net investment income | | 4.88%(5) | 5.20% | 5.07%(5) |
Portfolio Turnover | | 2%(4) | 32% | 26%(7) |
(1) | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(3) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
(4) | Not annualized. |
(5) | Annualized. |
(6) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
(7) | For the year ended August 31, 2008. |
| | | | |
S e e notes to financ ial statem ents |
124 |
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) |
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Municipals Trust (the Trust) is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust presently consists of twenty-five funds, twelve of which, each non-diversified, are included in these financial statements. They include Eaton Vance Alabama Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Alabama Municipals Fund) (Alabama Fund), Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Fund) (Arkansas Fund), Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund) (Georgia Fund), Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund) (Kentucky Fund), Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund) (Louisiana Fund), Eaton Vance Maryland Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Maryland Munici pals Fund) (Maryland Fund), Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund) (Missouri Fund), Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund) (North Carolina Fund), Eaton Vance Oregon Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund) (Oregon Fund), Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund) (South Carolina Fund), Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund) (Tennessee Fund) and Eaton Vance Virginia Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund) (Virginia Fund), (each individually referred to as the Fund, and collectively, the Funds). The Funds seek to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax and from particular state or local income or other taxes. The Arkansas Fund, Kentucky Fund, Louisiana Fund, Missouri Fund, Oregon Fund and Tennessee Fu nd each offer three classes of shares. The Alabama Fund, Georgia Fund, Maryland Fund, North Carolina Fund, South Carolina Fund and Virginia Fund each offer four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares of each Fund automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in each Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is alloc ated daily to each class of
shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Funds. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Funds’ financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Funds’ application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Municipal bonds and
taxable obligations, if any, are generally valued on the basis of valuations furnished by a third party pricing service, as derived from such service’s pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/ dealer quotations, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer. The pricing service may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Financial futures contracts are valued at the closing settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. Such pricing service valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their prese nt value using swap curves provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Short-term obligations, maturing in sixty days or less, are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of a Fund in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable entities, quo tations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer,
125
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions and Related
Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal Taxes — Each Fund’s policy is to comply
with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. Each Fund intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by each Fund, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.
At August 31, 2009, the following Funds, for federal income tax purposes, had capital loss carryforwards which will reduce the respective Fund’s taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Funds of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The amounts and expiration dates of the capital loss carryforwards are as follows:
| | | | |
Fund | Amount | Expiration Date |
Alabama | $ 143,185 | August | 31, | 2016 |
| 149,650 | August | 31, | 2017 |
|
Arkansas | $ 661,011 | August | 31, | 2013 |
| 126,693 | August | 31, | 2016 |
| 826,603 | August | 31, | 2017 |
|
Georgia | $ 129,324 | August | 31, | 2011 |
| 117,457 | August | 31, | 2012 |
| 931,893 | August | 31, | 2013 |
| 536,265 | August | 31, | 2015 |
| 306,338 | August | 31, | 2016 |
| 980,989 | August | 31, | 2017 |
| | | | |
Fund | Amount | Expiration Date |
Kentucky | $2,260,947 | August | 31, | 2012 |
| 944,485 | August | 31, | 2013 |
| 98,602 | August | 31, | 2016 |
| 155,003 | August | 31, | 2017 |
|
Louisiana | $ 183,393 | August | 31, | 2010 |
| 142,162 | August | 31, | 2012 |
| 197,480 | August | 31, | 2013 |
| 85,459 | August | 31, | 2016 |
| 292,157 | August | 31, | 2017 |
|
Maryland | $ 818,358 | August | 31, | 2013 |
| 204,999 | August | 31, | 2015 |
| 4,159,062 | August | 31, | 2016 |
| 34,823 | August | 31, | 2017 |
|
Missouri | $ 69,474 | August | 31, | 2010 |
| 135,451 | August | 31, | 2012 |
| 831,764 | August | 31, | 2013 |
| 337,671 | August | 31, | 2016 |
| 2,259,438 | August | 31, | 2017 |
|
North Carolina | $ 88,235 | August | 31, | 2015 |
| 274,170 | August | 31, | 2016 |
|
Oregon | $1,258,470 | August | 31, | 2013 |
| 2,145,240 | August | 31, | 2016 |
| 1,066,237 | August | 31, | 2017 |
|
South Carolina | $ 290,746 | August | 31, | 2013 |
| 1,027,752 | August | 31, | 2016 |
| 3,019,420 | August | 31, | 2017 |
|
Tennessee | $ 309,297 | August | 31, | 2013 |
| 238,529 | August | 31, | 2016 |
|
Virginia | $ 174,008 | August | 31, | 2012 |
| 1,185,970 | August | 31, | 2013 |
| 502,088 | August | 31, | 2016 |
| 3,212,881 | August | 31, | 2017 |
Additionally, at August 31, 2009, the Alabama Fund, Arkansas Fund, Georgia Fund, Kentucky Fund, Louisiana Fund, Maryland Fund, Missouri Fund, North Carolina Fund, Oregon Fund, South Carolina Fund, Tennessee Fund and Virginia Fund had net capital losses of $1,189,226, $2,288,148, $2,681,496, $410,720, $1,359,809, $1,720,414, $2,737,840, $3,569,092, $9,225,865, $10,960,707, $3,777,392 and $4,705,370, respectively, attributable to security transactions incurred after October 31, 2008. These net capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the Funds’ taxable year ending August 31, 2010.
As of February 28, 2010, the Funds had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Funds’ federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended August 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
126
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust
are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and
Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Funds. Pursuant to the respective custodian agreements, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance each Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce each Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statements of Operations.
F Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses
incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s
organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust, (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Fund shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume the defense on behalf of any Fund shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Fund property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, each Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. E ach Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against each Fund that have not yet occurred.
I Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction
with Securities Held — The Funds may invest in inverse floating rate securities, also referred to as residual interest bonds, whereby a Fund may sell a fixed rate bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Fund buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), set up by the broker, often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation (Inverse Floater). The broker deposits a fixed rate bond into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the fixed rate bond sold to the broker by the Fund, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the fixed rate bond purchased from the Fund (the Fixed Rate Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The Inverse Floater held by a Fund gives the Fund the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV to the Fund, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Fund exercise such right, it would pay the broker the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the Inverse Floater for the underlying Fixed Rate Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Funds account for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in their Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in their Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. Interest expense related to the Funds’ liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes i s recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Fund, as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At February 28, 2010, the amounts of the Funds’ Floating Rate Notes and related interest rates and collateral were as follows:
127
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | | |
| | | Collateral |
| Floating | Interest Rate | for Floating |
| Rate | or Range of | Rate |
| Notes | Interest | Notes |
Fund | Outstanding | Rates (%) | Outstanding |
Alabama | $1,305,000 | 0.20 | $ 1,748,744 |
Arkansas | 600,000 | 0.35 | 1,233,684 |
Georgia | 7,920,000 | 0.18 – 0.35 | 11,936,619 |
Louisiana | 310,000 | 0.35 | 637,403 |
Maryland | 2,280,000 | 0.21 – 0.26 | 3,271,570 |
Missouri | 1,880,000 | 0.18 – 0.35 | 3,506,529 |
North Carolina | 7,970,000 | 0.18 – 0.35 | 12,096,586 |
Oregon | 6,900,000 | 0.18 – 0.35 | 10,175,206 |
South Carolina | 3,350,000 | 0.18 – 0.35 | 5,940,939 |
Tennessee | 280,000 | 0.35 | 575,719 |
Virginia | 4,850,000 | 0.22 – 0.35 | 8,591,213 |
For the six months ended February 28, 2010, the Funds’ average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate (annualized) including fees were as follows:
| | |
| Average | |
| Floating | |
| Rate | |
| Notes | Average |
Fund | Outstanding | Interest Rate |
Alabama | $1,305,000 | 0.81% |
Arkansas | 600,000 | 1.58 |
Georgia | 7,920,000 | 0.95 |
Louisiana | 310,000 | 1.58 |
Maryland | 3,253,757 | 0.92 |
Missouri | 1,880,000 | 1.24 |
North Carolina | 7,970,000 | 0.96 |
Oregon | 6,900,000 | 0.92 |
South Carolina | 3,350,000 | 1.13 |
Tennessee | 280,000 | 1.58 |
Virginia | 4,850,000 | 1.22 |
The Funds may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with the broker by which a Fund agrees to reimburse the broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Funds had no shortfalls as of February 28, 2010.
The Funds may also purchase Inverse Floaters from brokers in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying fixed rate bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to Inverse Floaters purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments. The Funds’ investment
policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in Inverse Floaters. Inverse floating rate securities typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline.
The value and income of inverse floating rate securities are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Funds’ investment policies do not allow the Funds to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the Funds’ restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability in the Funds’ Statement of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Funds’ restrictions apply. Inverse Floaters held by the Funds are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
J Financial Futures Contracts — The Funds may
enter into financial futures contracts. The Funds’ investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, a Fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Fund each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange t raded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
K Interest Rate Swaps — The Funds may enter into
interest rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to these agreements, a Fund makes periodic payments at a fixed interest rate and, in exchange, receives payments based on the interest rate of a benchmark industry index. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. A Fund is
128
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.
L When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery
Transactions — The Funds may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Funds maintain security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.
M Interim Financial Statements — The interim
financial statements relating to February 28, 2010 and for the six months then ended have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of the Funds’ management, reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The net investment income of each Fund is determined daily and substantially all of the net investment income so determined is declared as a dividend to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Distributions are paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards, if any), are made at least annually. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of a Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Funds distinguish between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Perm anent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton
Vance Management (EVM), as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to each Fund. The fee is based upon a percentage of average daily net assets plus a percentage of gross income (i.e., income other than gains from the sale of securities) as presented in the following table and is payable monthly.
| | | |
| | Annual | Daily |
Daily Net Assets | Asset Rate | Income Rate |
Up to $20 million | 0.10% | 1.00% |
$20 | million up to $40 million | 0.20 | 2.00 |
$40 | million up to $500 million | 0.30 | 3.00 |
On average daily net assets of $500 million or more, the rates are reduced. For the six months ended February 28, 2010, investment adviser fees incurred by the Funds and the effective annual rates, as a percentage of average daily net assets, were as follows:
| | |
| Investment | Effective |
Fund | Adviser Fee | Annual Rate |
Alabama | $ 77,521 | 0.28% |
Arkansas | 107,963 | 0.31 |
Georgia | 141,956 | 0.33 |
Kentucky | 76,723 | 0.28 |
Louisiana | 47,352 | 0.23 |
Maryland | 180,162 | 0.36 |
Missouri | 179,073 | 0.35 |
North Carolina | 197,442 | 0.38 |
Oregon | 312,855 | 0.41 |
South Carolina | 324,043 | 0.39 |
Tennessee | 80,259 | 0.28 |
Virginia | 267,658 | 0.38 |
EVM serves as administrator of each Fund, but receives no compensation. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of each Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Funds’ principal underwriter, received a portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the Funds. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5). Sub-transfer agent fees earned by EVM and Class A sales charges that the Funds were informed were received by EVD for the six months ended February 28, 2010 were as follows:
129
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | |
| EVM’s | EVD’s |
| Sub-Transfer | Class A |
Fund | Agent Fees | Sales Charges |
Alabama | $ 512 | $ 8,003 |
Arkansas | 608 | 16,272 |
Georgia | 762 | 7,624 |
Kentucky | 615 | 5,594 |
Louisiana | 233 | 6,415 |
Maryland | 946 | 17,528 |
Missouri | 995 | 7,936 |
North Carolina | 1,110 | 18,167 |
Oregon | 1,216 | 14,226 |
South Carolina | 797 | 20,749 |
Tennessee | 556 | 8,708 |
Virginia | 1,352 | 10,719 |
Except for Trustees of the Funds who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Funds out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Funds who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the six months ended February 28, 2010, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Funds are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
Each Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that each Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to each Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Trustees approved distribution and service fee payments equal to 0.20% per annum of each Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the six months ended February 28, 2010 for Class A shares amounted to the following:
| |
| Class A |
| Distribution and |
Fund | Service Fees |
Alabama | $ 44,447 |
Arkansas | 62,150 |
Georgia | 62,794 |
Kentucky | 48,345 |
Louisiana | 37,218 |
| |
| Class A |
| Distribution and |
Fund | Service Fees |
Maryland | $ 75,845 |
Missouri | 91,186 |
North Carolina | 79,367 |
Oregon | 121,550 |
South Carolina | 104,017 |
Tennessee | 46,811 |
Virginia | 104,025 |
Each Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require each Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the respective Funds. Each Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 5% and 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by each Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, respectively, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amo unts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the six months ended February 28, 2010, the Funds paid or accrued to EVD the following distribution fees, representing 0.75% (annualized) of the average daily net assets of each Fund’s Class B and Class C shares:
| | |
| Class B | Class C |
| Distribution | Distribution |
Fund | Fees | Fees |
Alabama | $21,464 | $ 6,235 |
Arkansas | 13,559 | 15,044 |
Georgia | 23,402 | 33,204 |
Kentucky | 14,975 | 9,371 |
Louisiana | 8,204 | 6,671 |
Maryland | 28,070 | 50,049 |
Missouri | 22,868 | 21,306 |
North Carolina | 17,684 | 36,937 |
Oregon | 43,650 | 74,512 |
South Carolina | 34,636 | 93,610 |
Tennessee | 14,496 | 23,786 |
Virginia | 35,194 | 48,811 |
130
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
At February 28, 2010, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately as follows:
| | |
Fund | Class B | Class C |
Alabama | $1,180,000 | $ 255,000 |
Arkansas | 1,136,000 | 399,000 |
Georgia | 1,692,000 | 713,000 |
Kentucky | 1,186,000 | 205,000 |
Louisiana | 724,000 | 97,000 |
Maryland | 3,671,000 | 973,000 |
Missouri | 409,000 | 360,000 |
North Carolina | 1,725,000 | 712,000 |
Oregon | 1,639,000 | 1,395,000 |
South Carolina | 1,197,000 | 2,006,000 |
Tennessee | 676,000 | 463,000 |
Virginia | 954,000 | 812,000 |
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Funds to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of the average daily net assets attributable to that class. The Trustees approved service fee payments equal to 0.20% per annum of each Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the Class B and Class C sales commissions and distribution fees and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the six months ended February 28, 2010 amounted to the following:
| | |
| Class B | Class C |
| Service | Service |
Fund | Fees | Fees |
Alabama | $ 5,724 | $ 1,663 |
Arkansas | 3,615 | 4,011 |
Georgia | 6,241 | 8,854 |
Kentucky | 3,993 | 2,499 |
Louisiana | 2,187 | 1,779 |
Maryland | 7,486 | 13,347 |
Missouri | 6,099 | 5,681 |
North Carolina | 4,715 | 9,850 |
Oregon | 11,640 | 19,869 |
South Carolina | 9,236 | 24,963 |
Tennessee | 3,865 | 6,343 |
Virginia | 9,385 | 13,016 |
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within eighteen months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under ce rtain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under each Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to each Fund. For the six months ended February 28, 2010, the Funds were informed that EVD received approximately the following amounts of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders:
| | | |
Fund | Class A | Class B | Class C |
Alabama | $ — | $3,000 | $ — |
Arkansas | — | 2,000 | 200 |
Georgia | — | 2,000 | 300 |
Kentucky | — | 700 | 60 |
Louisiana | — | — | 10 |
Maryland | — | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Missouri | — | 3,000 | 1,000 |
North Carolina | — | 2,000 | 70 |
Oregon | — | 2,000 | 800 |
South Carolina | 15,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
Tennessee | — | 60 | 400 |
Virginia | 800 | 8,000 | 60 |
6 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, for the six months ended February 28, 2010 were as follows:
| | |
Fund | Purchases | Sales |
Alabama | $ 4,183,325 | $ 5,108,832 |
Arkansas | 7,559,259 | 3,382,402 |
Georgia | 8,378,875 | 9,300,576 |
131
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | |
Fund | Purchases | Sales |
Kentucky | $ 626,865 | $ 857,822 |
Louisiana | 2,445,358 | 5,717,834 |
Maryland | 4,869,140 | 6,422,254 |
Missouri | 3,899,758 | 7,105,743 |
North Carolina | 18,472,396 | 8,195,301 |
Oregon | 20,689,363 | 23,075,906 |
South Carolina | 26,086,295 | 23,291,917 |
Tennessee | 4,976,129 | 4,556,795 |
Virginia | 4,731,488 | 3,095,904 |
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
Each Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Funds) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | |
Alabama Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 299,281 | 536,099 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 54,462 | 118,542 |
Redemptions | (363,472) | (1,430,771) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 122,987 | 149,990 |
Net increase (decrease) | 113,258 | (626,140) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 10,761 | 37,389 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 5,241 | 16,687 |
Redemptions | (52,421) | (135,353) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (112,509) | (136,249) |
Net decrease | (148,928) | (217,526) |
| | |
Alabama Fund (continued) | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 56,332 | 85,757 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 1,020 | 1,757 |
Redemptions | (12,547) | (28,147) |
Net increase | 44,805 | 59,367 |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class I | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 127,390 | 167,782 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 1 | 269 |
Redemptions | (20,921) | (232,195) |
Net increase (decrease) | 106,470 | (64,144) |
|
|
Arkansas Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 432,547 | 1,047,945 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 94,422 | 196,653 |
Redemptions | (280,834) | (789,369) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 9,825 | 54,938 |
Net increase | 255,960 | 510,167 |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 26,091 | 32,025 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 4,551 | 10,247 |
Redemptions | (24,062) | (43,450) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (9,141) | (51,116) |
Net decrease | (2,561) | (52,294) |
132
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | |
Arkansas Fund (continued) | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 208,394 | 118,079 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 2,464 | 3,552 |
Redemptions | (39,008) | (69,967) |
Net increase | 171,850 | 51,664 |
|
|
Georgia Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 369,448 | 889,704 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 96,684 | 197,490 |
Redemptions | (799,464) | (1,652,319) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 63,578 | 135,208 |
Net decrease | (269,754) | (429,917) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 5,996 | 42,374 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 6,990 | 17,258 |
Redemptions | (32,512) | (120,425) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (52,631) | (126,425) |
Net decrease | (72,157) | (187,218) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 206,243 | 290,089 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 10,874 | 21,451 |
Redemptions | (121,295) | (234,640) |
Net increase | 95,822 | 76,900 |
| | |
Georgia Fund (continued) | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class I | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 360,119 | 463,954 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 187 | 33 |
Redemptions | (256,737) | (218,151) |
Net increase | 103,569 | 245,836 |
|
|
Kentucky Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 261,422 | 458,537 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 87,605 | 187,410 |
Redemptions | (338,337) | (1,029,077) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 30,880 | 141,013 |
Net increase (decrease) | 41,570 | (242,117) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 7,161 | 13,631 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 4,928 | 15,015 |
Redemptions | (34,591) | (107,841) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (28,574) | (130,506) |
Net decrease | (51,076) | (209,701) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 14,301 | 79,803 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 3,030 | 6,452 |
Redemptions | (41,786) | (45,584) |
Net increase (decrease) | (24,455) | 40,671 |
133
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | |
Louisiana Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 179,661 | 458,204 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 56,646 | 119,676 |
Redemptions | (557,504) | (1,066,456) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 84,546 | 116,328 |
Net decrease | (236,651) | (372,248) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 5,526 | 5,900 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 2,172 | 5,752 |
Redemptions | (13,120) | (42,434) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (79,939) | (109,980) |
Net decrease | (85,361) | (140,762) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 28,787 | 154,394 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 977 | 1,370 |
Redemptions | (26,326) | (3,712) |
Net increase | 3,438 | 152,052 |
|
|
Maryland Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 495,298 | 1,239,297 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 123,256 | 292,491 |
Redemptions | (1,037,088) | (2,115,912) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 105,854 | 108,611 |
Net decrease | (312,680) | (475,513) |
| | |
Maryland Fund (continued) | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 32,429 | 89,230 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 9,189 | 25,186 |
Redemptions | (45,811) | (241,242) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (97,039) | (99,495) |
Net decrease | (101,232) | (226,321) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 170,596 | 493,641 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 14,411 | 28,748 |
Redemptions | (84,037) | (221,553) |
Net increase | 100,970 | 300,836 |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class I | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 440,466 | 45,149 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 25 | — |
Redemptions | (3,277) | (3,041) |
Net increase | 437,214 | 42,108 |
|
|
Missouri Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 453,272 | 1,245,404 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 130,214 | 301,436 |
Redemptions | (857,082) | (1,812,744) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 124,923 | 89,216 |
Net decrease | (148,673) | (176,688) |
134
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | |
Missouri Fund (continued) | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 11,957 | 53,957 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 5,081 | 13,339 |
Redemptions | (32,392) | (49,759) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (112,949) | (80,711) |
Net decrease | (128,303) | (63,174) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 34,324 | 127,073 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 5,026 | 14,122 |
Redemptions | (48,758) | (125,037) |
Net increase (decrease) | (9,408) | 16,158 |
|
|
North Carolina Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 957,263 | 1,224,791 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 133,474 | 278,440 |
Redemptions | (1,123,465) | (2,569,259) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 46,094 | 145,051 |
Net increase (decrease) | 13,366 | (920,977) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 26,801 | 39,265 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 4,996 | 12,632 |
Redemptions | (75,081) | (76,755) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (42,834) | (134,713) |
Net decrease | (86,118) | (159,571) |
| | |
North Carolina Fund (continued) | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 274,239 | 336,368 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 12,143 | 20,534 |
Redemptions | (57,103) | (287,643) |
Net increase | 229,279 | 69,259 |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class I | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 747,117 | 1,276,820 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 1,545 | 1,062 |
Redemptions | (59,567) | (445,234) |
Net increase | 689,095 | 832,648 |
|
|
Oregon Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 907,308 | 2,238,279 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 219,077 | 493,722 |
Redemptions | (1,327,207) | (3,192,524) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 131,997 | 186,379 |
Net decrease | (68,825) | (274,144) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 45,743 | 181,030 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 15,246 | 39,765 |
Redemptions | (64,822) | (261,771) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (120,659) | (170,232) |
Net decrease | (124,492) | (211,208) |
135
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | |
Oregon Fund (continued) | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 201,847 | 698,241 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 31,038 | 60,200 |
Redemptions | (188,386) | (446,224) |
Net increase | 44,499 | 312,217 |
|
|
South Carolina Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 550,504 | 2,537,743 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 168,130 | 382,509 |
Redemptions | (1,348,830) | (3,503,845) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 88,102 | 112,329 |
Net decrease | (542,094) | (471,264) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 38,367 | 67,992 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 11,678 | 30,211 |
Redemptions | (76,417) | (161,441) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (83,085) | (105,938) |
Net decrease | (109,457) | (169,176) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 416,572 | 899,650 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 29,657 | 56,261 |
Redemptions | (179,942) | (671,151) |
Net increase | 266,287 | 284,760 |
| | |
South Carolina Fund (continued) | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class I | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 1,254,583 | 1,768,242 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 608 | 482 |
Redemptions | (356,632) | (1,601,080) |
Net increase | 898,559 | 167,644 |
|
|
Tennessee Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 406,997 | 873,304 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 67,823 | 159,260 |
Redemptions | (487,088) | (1,119,926) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 47,624 | 76,950 |
Net increase (decrease) | 35,356 | (10,412) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 4,820 | 43,387 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 4,336 | 13,205 |
Redemptions | (25,411) | (84,570) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (43,705) | (70,599) |
Net decrease | (59,960) | (98,577) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 167,527 | 326,858 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 7,234 | 12,873 |
Redemptions | (59,982) | (115,222) |
Net increase | 114,779 | 224,509 |
136
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | |
Virginia Fund | | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class A | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 600,036 | 1,846,806 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 175,872 | 374,827 |
Redemptions | (1,553,465) | (2,172,135) |
Exchange from Class B shares | 197,676 | 220,724 |
Net increase (decrease) | (579,881) | 270,222 |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class B | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 39,038 | 128,299 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 11,771 | 36,903 |
Redemptions | (81,267) | (401,998) |
Exchange to Class A shares | (178,489) | (199,317) |
Net decrease | (208,947) | (436,113) |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class C | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 156,992 | 505,153 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 16,793 | 34,765 |
Redemptions | (90,347) | (194,792) |
Net increase | 83,438 | 345,126 |
|
| Six Months Ended | |
| February 28, 2010 | Year Ended |
Class I | (Unaudited) | August 31, 2009 |
Sales | 1,012,928 | 1,551,265 |
Issued to shareholders electing to | | |
receive payments of distributions in | | |
Fund shares | 71 | — |
Redemptions | (130,345) | (517,374) |
Net increase | 882,654 | 1,033,891 |
8 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of each Fund at February 28, 2010, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| |
Alabama Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $ 53,540,793 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 2,542,256 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (649,431) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 1,892,825 |
|
Arkansas Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $ 69,489,732 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 1,990,087 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (2,066,485) |
Net unrealized depreciation | $ (76,398) |
|
Georgia Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $ 83,846,163 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 3,213,566 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (2,051,542) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 1,162,024 |
|
Kentucky Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $ 52,920,811 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 2,458,227 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (1,146,678) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 1,311,549 |
|
Louisiana Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $ 39,078,651 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 1,534,443 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (1,443,626) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 90,817 |
|
Maryland Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $ 96,685,604 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 3,790,600 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (3,016,810) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 773,790 |
137
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| |
Missouri Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $ 97,712,462 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 5,153,898 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (2,758,382) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 2,395,516 |
|
North Carolina Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $108,138,217 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 6,263,144 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (1,732,215) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 4,530,929 |
|
Oregon Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $150,796,963 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 7,300,130 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (5,904,346) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 1,395,784 |
|
South Carolina Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $163,316,169 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 5,381,400 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (2,404,195) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 2,977,205 |
|
Tennessee Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $ 55,885,682 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 3,374,097 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (2,123,922) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 1,250,175 |
|
Virginia Fund | |
Aggregate cost | $138,663,573 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | $ 8,346,629 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (4,860,097) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 3,486,532 |
9 Line of Credit
The Funds participate with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million
unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Funds solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to each Fund based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. Because the line of credit is not available exclusively to the Funds, a Fund may be unable to borrow some or all of its requested amounts at any particular time. At February 28, 2010, the Oregon Fund had a balance outstanding pursuant to this line of credit of $900,000 at an interest rate of 1.37%. Based on the short-term nature of the borrowings under the line of credit and variable interest rate, the carrying value of the borrowings approximated its fair value at February 28, 2010. The Funds’ average borrowings or allocated fees during the six months ended February 28, 2010 were not significant.
10 Overdraft Advances
Pursuant to the respective custodian agreements, SSBT may, in its discretion, advance funds to the Funds to make properly authorized payments. When such payments result in an overdraft, the Funds are obligated to repay SSBT at the current rate of interest charged by SSBT for secured loans (currently, a rate above the Federal Funds rate). This obligation is payable on demand to SSBT. SSBT has a lien on a Fund’s assets to the extent of any overdraft. At February 28, 2010, the Oregon Fund had payments due to SSBT pursuant to the foregoing arrangement of $64,403.
11 Financial Instruments
The Funds may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of their investing activities. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts and interest rate swaps and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment a Fund has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at February 28, 2010 is as follows:
138
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Net |
| Expiration | | | Aggregate | | | | Unrealized |
Fund | Date | | Contracts | Position | Cost | | Value | | Depreciation |
Alabama | 6/10 | 35 | | | | | | | | |
| | | U.S. Treasury Bond | Short | $ (4,083,940) $ (4,119,062) | $ (35,122) |
Georgia | 6/10 | 85 | | | | | | | | |
| | | U.S. Treasury Bond | Short | $ (9,894,898) $(10,003,437) | $(108,539) |
Louisiana | 6/10 | 11 | | | | | | | | |
| | | U.S. 10 Year | | | | | | | |
| | | Treasury Notes | Short | $ (1,273,555) $ (1,292,328) | $ (18,773) |
Maryland | 6/10 | 106 | | | | | | | | |
| | | U.S. Treasury Bond | Short | $(12,368,505) $(12,474,875) | $(106,370) |
Missouri | 6/10 | 79 | | | | | | | | |
| | | U.S. Treasury Bond | Short | $ (9,218,036) $ (9,297,313) | $ (79,277) |
Tennessee | 6/10 | 60 | | | | | | | | |
| | | U.S. Treasury Bond | Short | $ (6,984,633) $ (7,061,250) | $ (76,617) |
Virginia | 6/10 | 360 | | | | | | | | |
| | | U.S. Treasury Bond | Short | $(41,907,803) | $(42,367,500) | $(459,697) |
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps | | | | | | | | |
|
Alabama Fund | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Annual | Floating | | Effective Date/ | | |
| | Notional | Fixed Rate | Rate | | | Termination | Net Unrealized |
Counterparty | Amount | Paid By Fund | Paid To Fund | Date | | Depreciation |
Merrill Lynch | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital | | | | | 3-month | | May 24, 2010/ | | |
Services, Inc. | $ 900,000 | 4.665% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | May 24, 2040 | | $ (29,102) |
| | | | | | | | | | | $ (29,102) |
|
|
Arkansas Fund | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Annual | Floating | | Effective Date/ | Net Unrealized |
| | Notional | Fixed Rate | Rate | | | Termination | Appreciation |
Counterparty | Amount | Paid By Fund | Paid To Fund | Date | | (Depreciation) |
Citibank, N.A | $2,000,000 4.255% | 3-month | | March 8, 2010/ | | |
| | | | | USD-LIBOR-BBA | March 8, 2040 | | $ 56,363 |
JPMorgan | | | | | 3-month | | March 8, 2010/ | | |
Chase Co. | | $2,000,000 4.279% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | March 8, 2040 | | $ 48,217 |
JPMorgan | | | | | 3-month | | March 15, 2010/ | | |
Chase Co. | | $ 912,500 | 4.097% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | March 15, 2040 | | $ 50,871 |
Merrill Lynch | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital | | | | | 3-month | | May 24, 2010/ | | |
Services, Inc. | $2,750,000 4.665% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | May 24, 2040 | | $ (88,922) |
| | | | | | | | | | | $ 66,529 |
| | | | | |
Georgia Fund | | | | | |
| | Annual | Floating | Effective Date/ | Net Unrealized |
| Notional | Fixed Rate | Rate | Termination | Appreciation |
Counterparty | Amount | Paid By Fund | Paid To Fund | Date | (Depreciation) |
JPMorgan | | | 3-month | March 15, 2010/ | |
Chase Co. | $1,612,500 | 4.097% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | March 15, 2040 | $ 89,896 |
Merrill Lynch | | | | | |
Capital | | | 3-month | May 24, 2010/ | |
Services, Inc. | $4,000,000 | 4.665% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | May 24, 2040 | $(129,341) |
| | | | | $ (39,445) |
Kentucky Fund | | | | |
| | Annual | Floating | Effective Date/ | |
| Notional | Fixed Rate | Rate | Termination | Net Unrealized |
Counterparty | Amount | Paid By Fund | Paid To Fund | Date | Depreciation |
Barclays | | | 3-month | July 27, 2010/ | |
Bank PLC | $2,000,000 | 4.532% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | July 27, 2039 | $ (28,387) |
Merrill Lynch | | | | | |
Capital | | | 3-month | May 24, 2010/ | |
Services, Inc. | $3,000,000 | 4.665% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | May 24, 2040 | $ (97,006) |
| | | | | $ (125,393) |
|
Louisiana Fund | | | | |
| | Annual | Floating | Effective Date/ | |
| Notional | Fixed Rate | Rate | Termination | Net Unrealized |
Counterparty | Amount | Paid By Fund | Paid To Fund | Date | Appreciation |
JPMorgan | | | 3-month | March 15, 2010/ | |
Chase Co. | $ 837,500 | 4.097% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | March 15, 2040 | $ 46,690 |
| | | | | $ 46,690 |
|
Maryland Fund | | | | |
| | Annual | Floating | Effective Date/ | |
| Notional | Fixed Rate | Rate | Termination | Net Unrealized |
Counterparty | Amount | Paid By Fund | Paid To Fund | Date | Appreciation |
JPMorgan | | | 3-month | March 15, 2010/ | |
Chase Co. | $1,837,500 | 4.097% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | March 15, 2040 | $ 102,439 |
| | | | | $ 102,439 |
|
Missouri Fund | | | | | |
| | Annual | Floating | Effective Date/ | Net Unrealized |
| Notional | Fixed Rate | Rate | Termination | Appreciation |
Counterparty | Amount | Paid By Fund | Paid To Fund | Date | (Depreciation) |
JPMorgan | | | 3-month | March 15, 2010/ | |
Chase Co. | $2,025,000 | 4.097% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | March 15, 2040 | $ 112,892 |
Merrill Lynch | | | | | |
Capital | | | 3-month | May 24, 2010/ | |
Services, Inc. | $1,825,000 | 4.665% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | May 24, 2040 | $ (59,011) |
| | | | | $ 53,881 |
139
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | | | | |
Tennessee Fund | | | | |
| | Annual | Floating | Effective Date/ | Net Unrealized |
| Notional | Fixed Rate | Rate | Termination | Appreciation |
Counterparty | Amount | Paid By Fund | Paid To Fund | Date | (Depreciation) |
JPMorgan | | | 3-month | March 15, 2010/ | |
Chase Co. | $1,150,000 | 4.097% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | March 15, 2040 | $ 64,112 |
Merrill Lynch | | | | | |
Capital | | | 3-month | May 24, 2010/ | |
Services, Inc. | $3,000,000 | 4.665% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | May 24, 2040 | $ (97,006) |
| | | | | $ (32,894) |
|
|
Virginia Fund | | | | | |
| | Annual | Floating | Effective Date/ | Net Unrealized |
| Notional | Fixed Rate | Rate | Termination | Appreciation |
Counterparty | Amount | Paid By Fund | Paid To Fund | Date | (Depreciation) |
JPMorgan | | | 3-month | March 15, 2010/ | |
Chase Co. | $2,537,500 | 4.097% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | March 15, 2040 | $ 141,464 |
Merrill Lynch | | | | | |
Capital | | | 3-month | May 24, 2010/ | |
Services, Inc | $2,475,000 | 4.665% | USD-LIBOR-BBA | May 24, 2040 | $ (80,030) |
| | | | | $ 61,434 |
The effective date represents the date on which a Fund and the counterparty to the interest rate swap contract begin interest payment accruals.
At February 28, 2010, the Funds had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
Each Fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Funds hold fixed rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. To hedge against this risk, each Fund may enter into interest rate swap contracts. The Funds may also purchase and sell U.S. Treasury futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The Funds enter into interest rate swap contracts that may contain provisions whereby the counterparty may terminate the contract under certain conditions, including but not limited to a decline in a Fund’s net assets below a certain level over a certain period of time, which would trigger a payment by the Fund for those swaps in a liability position. At February 28, 2010, the fair value of interest rate swaps with credit-related contingent features in a liability position was equal to the fair value of the liability derivative related to interest rate swaps included in the table below for each respective Fund. The value of securities pledged as collateral, if any, for open interest rate swap contracts at February 28, 2010 is disclosed in a note to each Fund’s Portfolio of Investments.
The non-exchange traded derivatives in which a Fund invests, including swap contracts, are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its
obligations under the contract. At February 28, 2010, the maximum amount of loss the Funds would incur due to counterparty risk was equal to the fair value of the asset derivative related to interest rate swaps included in the table below for each respective Fund. Counterparties may be required to pledge collateral in the form of cash, U.S. Government securities or highly-rated bonds for the benefit of a Fund if the net amount due from the counterparty with respect to a derivative contract exceeds a certain threshold. The amount of collateral posted by the counterparties with respect to such contracts would also reduce the amount of any loss incurred.
The fair values of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at February 28, 2010 were as follows:
| | |
| Fair Value |
| Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives |
Alabama Fund | | |
Futures Contracts | $ — | $ (35,122)(1) |
Interest Rate Swaps | — | (29,102)(2) |
Total | $ — | $ (64,224) |
Arkansas Fund | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | $155,451(3) | $ (88,922)(2) |
Total | $155,451 | $ (88,922) |
Georgia Fund | | |
Futures Contracts | $ — | $(108,539)(1) |
Interest Rate Swaps | 89,896(3) | (129,341)(2) |
Total | $ 89,896 | $ (237,880) |
Kentucky Fund | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ — | $(125,393)(2) |
Total | $ — | $ (125,393) |
Louisiana Fund | | |
Futures Contracts | $ — | $ (18,773)(1) |
Interest Rate Swaps | 46,690(3) | — |
Total | $ 46,690 | $ (18,773) |
Maryland Fund | | |
Futures Contracts | $ — | $(106,370)(1) |
Interest Rate Swaps | 102,439(3) | — |
Total | $102,439 | $ (106,370) |
Missouri Fund | | |
Futures Contracts | $ — | $ (79,277)(1) |
Interest Rate Swaps | 112,892(3) | (59,011)(2) |
Total | $112,892 | $ (138,288) |
140
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | |
| Fair Value |
| Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives |
Tennessee Fund | | |
Futures Contracts | $ — | $ (76,617)(1) |
Interest Rate Swaps | 64,112(3) | (97,006)(2) |
Total | $ 64,112 | $ (173,623) |
Virginia Fund | | |
Futures Contracts | $ — | $(459,697)(1) |
Interest Rate Swaps | 141,464(3) | (80,030)(2) |
Total | $141,464 | $ (539,727) |
(1) | Amount represents cumulative unrealized depreciation on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. |
| Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
(2) | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Payable for open swap contracts; Net unrealized appreciation |
(depreciation).
(3)
Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Receivable for open swap contracts; Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation).
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk for the six months ended February 28, 2010 was as follows:
| | |
| | Change in |
| | Unrealized |
| Realized Gain | Appreciation |
| (Loss) on | (Depreciation) on |
| Derivatives | Derivatives |
| Recognized in | Recognized in |
Fund | Income(1) | Income(2) |
Alabama | $ 17,587 | $ 7,822 |
Arkansas | 306,163 | (52,864) |
Georgia | (142,643) | 322,470 |
Kentucky | 49,723 | 112,746 |
Louisiana | (115,618) | 133,387 |
Maryland | (186,207) | 239,175 |
Missouri | (231,203) | 350,351 |
North Carolina | (199,754) | 165,515 |
Oregon | (249,266) | 206,540 |
South Carolina | (150,242) | 124,490 |
Tennessee | (105,401) | 238,492 |
Virginia | (25,731) | 175,283 |
(1) | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Financial futures contracts and swap contracts. |
(2) | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Financial futures contracts and swap contracts. |
The average notional amounts of futures contracts and interest rate swaps outstanding during the six months ended February 28, 2010, which are indicative of the volume of these derivative types, were approximately as follows:
| | |
| Futures Contacts – | Interest Rate Swaps – |
| Average Notional | Average Notional |
Fund | Amount | Amount |
Alabama | $ 3,900,000 | $ 900,000 |
Arkansas | — | 7,662,500 |
Georgia | 8,500,000 | 5,612,500 |
Kentucky | — | 5,000,000 |
Louisiana | 1,500,000 | 837,500 |
Maryland | 10,600,000 | 1,837,500 |
Missouri | 7,900,000 | 3,850,000 |
North Carolina | — | 209,000 |
Oregon | — | 261,000 |
South Carolina | — | 157,000 |
Tennessee | 6,000,000 | 4,150,000 |
Virginia | 36,000,000 | 5,012,500 |
12 Fair Value Measurements
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At February 28, 2010, the inputs used in valuing the Funds’ investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
141
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | | | | | | |
Alabama Fund | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | |
| Markets for | Other | Significant | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $56,738,618 | $ — | $56,738,618 |
Total Investments | $ — | $56,738,618 | $ — | $56,738,618 |
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | $(35,122) $ | — | $ — | $ (35,122) |
Interest Rate Swaps | | — | | (29,102) | | — | (29,102) |
Total | $(35,122) $ | (29,102) | $ — | $ (64,224) |
|
|
Arkansas Fund | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | |
| Markets for | Other | Significant | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $70,013,334 | $ — | $70,013,334 |
Total Investments | $ — | $70,013,334 | $ — | $70,013,334 |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ — | $ 155,451 | $ — | $ 155,451 |
Total | $ — | $70,168,785 | $ — | $70,168,785 |
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ — | $ (88,922) | $ — | $ (88,922) |
Total | $ — | $ (88,922) | $ — | $ (88,922) |
|
|
Georgia Fund | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | |
| Markets for | Other | Significant | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $92,928,187 | $ — | $92,928,187 |
Total Investments | $ — | $92,928,187 | $ — | $92,928,187 |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ — | $ 89,896 | $ — | $ 89,896 |
Total | $ — | $93,018,083 | $ — | $93,018,083 |
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | $(108,539) $ | — | $ — | $ (108,539) |
Interest Rate Swaps | | — | | (129,341) | | — | (129,341) |
Total | $(108,539) $ | (129,341) | $ — | $ (237,880) |
| | | | | | | |
Kentucky Fund | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | |
| Markets for | Other | Significant | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $54,232,360 | $ — | $54,232,360 |
Total Investments | $ — | $54,232,360 | $ — | $54,232,360 |
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ — | $ (125,393) | $ — | $ (125,393) |
Total | $ — | $ (125,393) | $ — | $ (125,393) |
|
|
Louisiana Fund | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | |
| Markets for | Other | Significant | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $39,479,468 | $ — | $39,479,468 |
Total Investments | $ — | $39,479,468 | $ — | $39,479,468 |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ — | $ 46,690 | $ — | $ 46,690 |
Total | $ — | $39,526,158 | $ — | $39,526,158 |
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | $(18,773) $ | — | $ — | $ (18,773) |
Total | $(18,773) $ | — | $ — | $ (18,773) |
|
|
Maryland Fund | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | |
| Markets for | Other | Significant | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $99,739,394 | $ — | $99,739,394 |
Total Investments | $ — | $99,739,394 | $ — | $99,739,394 |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ — | $ 102,439 | $ — | $ 102,439 |
Total | $ — | $99,841,833 | $ — | $99,841,833 |
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | $(106,370) $ | — | $ — | $ (106,370) |
Total | $(106,370) $ | — | $ — | $ (106,370) |
142
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
| | | | | | | | |
Missouri Fund | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | | |
| Markets for | Other | | Significant | | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total | |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $101,987,978 | $ — | $101,987,978 |
Total Investments | $ — | $101,987,978 | $ — | $101,987,978 |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ — | $ 112,892 | $ — | $ 112,892 |
Total | $ — | $102,100,870 | $ — | $102,100,870 |
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | $(79,277) $ | — | $ — | $ (79,277) |
Interest Rate Swaps | | — | | (59,011) | | — | | (59,011) |
Total | $(79,277) $ | (59,011) | $ — | $ (138,288) |
|
|
North Carolina Fund | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | | |
| Markets for | Other | | Significant | | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total | |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $120,639,146 | $ — | $120,639,146 |
Total Investments | $ — | $120,639,146 | $ — | $120,639,146 |
|
|
Oregon Fund | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | | |
| Markets for | Other | | Significant | | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total | |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $159,092,747 | $ — | $159,092,747 |
Total Investments | $ — | $159,092,747 | $ — | $159,092,747 |
|
|
South Carolina Fund | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | | |
| Markets for | Other | | Significant | | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total | |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $169,643,374 | $ — | $169,643,374 |
Total Investments | $ — | $169,643,374 | $ — | $169,643,374 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Tennessee Fund | | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | | |
| Active | | | Significant | | | | |
| Markets for | Other | Significant | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | | |
| Assets | | | Inputs | Inputs | | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Total |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $57,415,857 | $ — | $57,415,857 |
Total Investments | $ — | $57,415,857 | $ — | $57,415,857 |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ — | $ 64,112 | $ — | $ 64,112 |
Total | $ — | $57,479,969 | $ — | $57,479,969 |
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | $(76,617) $ | — | $ — | $ (76,617) |
Interest Rate Swaps | | — | | (97,006) | — | | (97,006) |
Total | $(76,617) $ | (97,006) $ | — | $ (173,623) |
|
|
Virginia Fund | | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted | | | | | | | | |
| Prices in | | | | | | | | |
| Active | | Significant | | | | |
| Markets for | Other | | Significant | | | |
| Identical | | Observable | Unobservable | | |
| Assets | | Inputs | Inputs | | | |
Asset Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | | Total | |
Tax-Exempt Investments | $ — | $147,000,105 | $ — | $147,000,105 |
Total Investments | $ — | $147,000,105 | $ — | $147,000,105 |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ — | $ 141,464 | $ — | $ 141,464 |
Total | $ — | $147,141,569 | $ — | $147,141,569 |
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | $(459,697) $ | | — | $ — | $ (459,697) |
Interest Rate Swaps | | — | | | (80,030) | | — | | (80,030) |
Total | $(459,697) $ | | (80,030) | $ — | $ (539,727) |
The Funds held no investments or other financial instruments as of August 31, 2009 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
13 Name Change
Effective December 1, 2009, the names of Eaton Vance Alabama Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Maryland Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Oregon Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Tennessee
143
| | |
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds a s o f F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) C O N T ’ D |
Municipal Income Fund and Eaton Vance Virginia
Municipal Income Fund were changed from Eaton Vance
Alabama Municipals Fund, Eaton Vance Arkansas
Municipals Fund, Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund,
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund, Eaton Vance
Louisiana Municipals Fund, Eaton Vance Maryland
Municipals Fund, Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund,
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund, Eaton
Vance Oregon Municipals Fund, Eaton Vance South
Carolina Municipals Fund, Eaton Vance Tennessee
Municipals Fund and Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals
Fund, respectively.
144
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds;
An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds;
An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods;
Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices;
Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund;
Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund;
Information about Portfolio Management
Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel;
Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds;
Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund;
The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes;
Information about each Adviser
Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser;
Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts;
Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes;
Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures;
Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions;
Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates;
Other Relevant Information
Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates;
Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and
The terms of each advisory agreement.
145
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreements of the following funds:
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund
(the “Funds”), each with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Funds, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by each Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Funds, and recent changes in the identity of such personnel. In particular, the Board evaluated, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds.
146
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
Specifically, the Board considered the Adviser’s large municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Funds. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to each Fund by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Funds and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared each Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for each Fund. The Board considered the impact of extraordinary market conditions during 2008 on each Fund’s performance relative to its peer universe in light of, among other things, the Adviser’s strategy of generating current income through investments in higher quality (including insured) municipal bonds with longer maturities. On the basis of the foregoing and other relevant information, the Board concluded that the performance of each Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by each Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered each Fund’s management fees and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded with respect to each Fund that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to each Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their relationship with the Funds.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
147
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability of each Fund, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and each Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of each Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of each Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and eac h Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of each Fund, the structure of each advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
148
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds
OF F ICERS AND TRUS TEES
Eato n Vance Municipals Trust
| |
Officers | Trustees |
Thomas M. Metzold | Ralph F. Verni |
President | Chairman |
|
William H. Ahern, Jr. | Benjamin C. Esty |
Vice President | |
| Thomas E. Faust Jr. |
Craig R. Brandon | |
Vice President | Allen R. Freedman |
|
Cynthia J. Clemson | William H. Park |
Vice President | |
| Ronald A. Pearlman |
Adam A. Weigold | |
Vice President | Helen Frame Peters |
|
Barbara E. Campbell | Heidi L. Steiger |
Treasurer | |
| Lynn A. Stout |
Maureen A. Gemma | |
Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | |
|
Paul M. O’Neil | |
Chief Compliance Officer | |
149
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Fund Administrator
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Principal Underwriter*
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
1-800-262-1122
Eaton Vance Municipals Trust
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully a Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Funds’ current prospectus contains this and other information about the Funds and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.