UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-04409
Eaton Vance Municipals Trust
(Exact Name of registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(registrant’s Telephone Number)
August 31, 2009
Date of Fiscal Year End
February 28, 2009
Date of Reporting Period
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy only applies to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/ broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio (if applicable) will file a schedule of its portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | |
Investment Update | | | 2 | |
| | | | |
Performance Information and Portfolio Composition | | | | |
Alabama | | | 4 | |
Arkansas | | | 6 | |
Georgia | | | 8 | |
Kentucky | | | 10 | |
Louisiana | | | 12 | |
Maryland | | | 14 | |
Missouri | | | 16 | |
North Carolina | | | 18 | |
Oregon | | | 20 | |
South Carolina | | | 22 | |
Tennessee | | | 24 | |
Virginia | | | 26 | |
| | | | |
Fund Expenses | | | 28 | |
| | | | |
Financial Statements | | | 35 | |
| | | | |
Special Meeting of Shareholders | | | 140 | |
| | | | |
Board of Trustees’ Annual Approval of the Investment Advisory Agreements | | | 144 | |
| | | | |
Officers and Trustees | | | 147 | |
1
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
INVESTMENT UPDATE
Economic and Market Conditions
The U.S. economy, as measured by gross domestic product (GDP), contracted in the fourth quarter of 2008 by a staggering 6.2%, after declining 0.3% in the third quarter, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. In the first and second quarters, the economy grew by 0.9% and 2.8%, respectively. Most of the major GDP components contributed to the decline; however, particularly influential was a sharp downturn in consumer spending, which continued to weigh on the economy in early 2009. While high commodity prices eased since their summertime peaks, consumers continued to pare spending as they remained cautious of what increasingly became a weaker economic environment. Rising unemployment levels, at a five-year high at period end, led to constrained personal consumption and overall economic contraction. The housing market continued to weigh on the economy, with new home sales continuing to fall and existing home sales beginning to stabilize only as cautious buyers begin to see value in distressed pricing. Low home prices continued to pressure consumers and banks, causing increased bank foreclosures and more write-downs of mortgage-backed securities at commercial banks and financial institutions.
For the six months ending February 28, 2009, the capital markets experienced historic events resulting in unprecedented volatility. During September 2008, for example, the federal government took control of federally chartered mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. During the same month, Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy protection; Bank of America announced its acquisition of Merrill Lynch; and Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley petitioned the Federal Reserve (Fed) to become bank holding companies, a step that brings greater regulation but also easier access to credit. These actions, in conjunction with the announcement of Bear Stearns’ acquisition by JPMorgan Chase in March 2008, drastically redefined the Wall Street landscape. In addition to the independent Wall Street brokerages, the banking sector was shaken by the failure of Washington Mutual and the sale of Wachovia. In the insurance sector, the federal government has provided $180 billion in loans to help stabilize American International Group. (AIG). Finally, Congress approved a $700 billion program authorizing the federal government to purchase troubled assets from financial institutions, a program that has continued to evolve since the bill was enacted into law.
During the six months ending February 28, 2009, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate to a range of 0.0% to 0.25% from 2.00% as of August 31, 2008. In addition to its interest-rate policy, the Fed also took extraordinary actions through a variety of innovative lending techniques in an attempt to ease the credit crisis.
Management Discussion
Relative to the Funds’ primary benchmark, the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index1 (the Index) — a broad-based, unmanaged index of municipal bonds — the Funds underperformed for the six months ending February 28, 2009. As a result of an active management style that focuses on income and longer call protection, the Funds generally hold longer-maturity bonds. Management believes that much of the Funds’ underperformance can be attributed to the shift of investors’ capital into shorter-maturity bonds, a result of the broader-based credit crisis that has rattled the fixed-income markets since the summer of 2007. The move to shorter-term investments was originally driven by uncertainty surrounding financial companies’ exposure to subprime mortgage-backed debt but later spread to the muni market when major municipal bond insurers suffered rating downgrades due to their exposure to mortgage-related structured products. Management has historically used Treasury futures to seek to offset interest-rate volatility associated with investing in longer-maturity municipal bonds. Investors’ flight to quality during the period pushed Treasury yields to historic lows, hurting the Funds’ performance. In addition, North Carolina Fund’s investments in tender option bonds (TOBs)2 detracted from its performance.
| | |
1 | | Formerly called Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. |
|
2 | | TOBs are a form of investment leverage that create an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, create special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value). |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Funds’ current or future investments and may change due to active management.
2
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
INVESTMENT UPDATE
In mid-December 2008, the municipal market began to rally — with longer-maturity municipals performing better than shorter-maturity bonds — as buyers returned to the market. This trend continued through the end of the period. Despite the muni market’s rebound in January and February of 2009, the ratio of yields on current coupon AAA-rated insured municipal bonds to the yield on 30-year Treasury bonds remained well above the historical norm at 133.0% as of February 28, 2009, indicating municipals continued to represent relative value when compared to their taxable counterparts.1 We believe the spike in this ratio to over 200% in December 2008, as compared with the long-term average of 85%-90%, was the result of continued dislocation in the fixed-income marketplace caused by a flight to Treasury securities, municipal bond insurance companies’ risks and the decentralized nature of the municipal marketplace. Historically, such a spike in this ratio is a rare occurrence in the muni bond market and is generally considered a signal that municipal bonds are significantly undervalued relative to taxable Treasury bonds. As more buyers return to the municipals market, we would expect this ratio of relative value to normalize further.
Against this backdrop, we continue to manage our municipal funds with the same relative value approach that we have traditionally employed — maintaining a long-term perspective when markets exhibit extreme short-term volatility. We believe this approach has provided excellent long-term benefits to our investors over time.
| | |
1 | | Source: Bloomberg L.P. Yields are a compilation of a representative variety of general obligations and are not necessarily representative of a Fund’s yield. |
3
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: William H. Ahern, Jr., CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | ETALX | | EVALX | | ECALX | | EIALX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | |
Six Months | | | -3.72 | % | | | -4.04 | % | | | -4.04 | % | | | -3.63 | % |
One Year | | | 1.63 | | | | 0.81 | | | | 0.71 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 1.66 | | | | 0.92 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 3.47 | | | | 2.70 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.99 | | | | 4.16 | | | | -0.16 | | | | 1.81 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | |
Six Months | | | -8.34 | % | | | -8.74 | % | | | -4.98 | % | | | -3.63 | % |
One Year | | | -3.19 | | | | -4.04 | | | | -0.26 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.59 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.97 | | | | 2.70 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.66 | | | | 4.16 | | | | -0.16 | | | | 1.81 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 5/1/92; Class C: 3/21/06; Class I: 3/3/08 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 0.87 | % | | | 1.63 | % | | | 1.62 | % | | | 0.67 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 4.66 | % | | | 3.92 | % | | | 3.92 | % | | | 4.85 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 7.55 | | | | 6.35 | | | | 6.35 | | | | 7.85 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.17 | | | | 3.62 | | | | 3.63 | | | | 4.58 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 6.75 | | | | 5.86 | | | | 5.88 | | | | 7.42 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital |
| | Municipal Bond Index | | Municipal Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
|
Six Months | | | -2.89 | % |
One Year | | | 1.72 | |
Five Years | | | 1.66 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.19 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.11% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.25% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 151, 148, 133 and 114 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
4
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is AA-. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 26.1 | % |
AA | | | 28.7 | % |
A | | | 33.8 | % |
BBB | | | 7.3 | % |
B | | | 0.7 | % |
CCC | | | 1.0 | % |
Not Rated | | | 2.4 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
• Number of Issues: | | | 53 | |
• Average Maturity: | | 20.6 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 15.9 years |
• Average Call Protection: | | 72 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 92.16 | |
• TOB Leverage3 | | | 25 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
5
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | ETARX | | EVARX | | ECARX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | |
Six Months | | | -7.00 | % | | | -7.32 | % | | | -7.32 | % |
One Year | | | -2.02 | | | | -2.74 | | | | -2.64 | |
Five Years | | | 0.51 | | | | -0.22 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 3.01 | | | | 2.25 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.70 | | | | 3.68 | | | | -2.10 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | |
Six Months | | | -11.44 | % | | | -11.86 | % | | | -8.23 | % |
One Year | | | -6.63 | | | | -7.41 | | | | -3.58 | |
Five Years | | | -0.46 | | | | -0.55 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.51 | | | | 2.25 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.37 | | | | 3.68 | | | | -2.10 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 2/9/94; Class B: 10/2/92; Class C: 4/28/06 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 0.90 | % | | | 1.64 | % | | | 1.66 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 5.04 | % | | | 4.30 | % | | | 4.30 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 8.34 | | | | 7.11 | | | | 7.11 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.11 | | | | 3.55 | | | | 3.55 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 6.80 | | | | 5.87 | | | | 5.87 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital Municipal |
| | Municipal Bond Index | | Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification |
|
Six Months | | | -2.89 | % |
One Year | | | 1.72 | |
Five Years | | | 1.66 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.19 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.14% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 39.55% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 151, 148, 133 and 114 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
6
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by spe cial purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is A+. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 19.0 | % |
AA | | | 31.2 | % |
A | | | 27.9 | % |
BBB | | | 18.2 | % |
BB | | | 0.6 | % |
B | | | 0.8 | % |
CCC | | | 0.9 | % |
Not Rated | | | 1.4 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
• Number of Issues: | | | 79 | |
• Average Maturity: | | | 19.7 | years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | | 17.5 | years |
• Average Call Protection: | | | 8.4 | years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 90.44 | |
• TOB Leverage3: | | | 1.5 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
7
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PERFORMANCE IN FORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | ETGAX | | EVGAX | | ECGAX | | EIGAX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | -6.22 | % | | | -6.59 | % | | | -6.49 | % | | | -6.11 | % |
One Year | | | -0.31 | | | | -1.02 | | | | -0.91 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 0.61 | | | | -0.13 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.98 | | | | 2.22 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.49 | | | | 3.63 | | | | -1.75 | | | | 0.11 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
Six Months | | | -10.72 | % | | | -11.16 | % | | | -7.40 | % | | | -6.11 | % |
One Year | | | -5.06 | | | | -5.77 | | | | -1.86 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | -0.38 | | | | -0.46 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.48 | | | | 2.22 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.16 | | | | 3.63 | | | | -1.75 | | | | 0.11 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 12/23/91; Class C: 4/25/06; Class I: 3/3/08 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 0.98 | % | | | 1.73 | % | | | 1.74 | % | | | 0.79 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 4.96 | % | | | 4.22 | % | | | 4.22 | % | | | 5.16 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 8.12 | | | | 6.91 | | | | 6.91 | | | | 8.45 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.56 | | | | 4.04 | | | | 4.04 | | | | 4.99 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 7.46 | | | | 6.61 | | | | 6.61 | | | | 8.17 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Georgia Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
Six Months | | | -2.36 | % |
One Year | | | 2.37 | |
Five Years | | | 1.61 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.31 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.21% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.90% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. 6 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Georgia Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 22, 21, 19 and 16 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
8
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by spe cial purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is AA-. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 28.3 | % |
AA | | | 43.4 | % |
A | | | 19.8 | % |
BBB | | | 5.7 | % |
BB | | | 0.4 | % |
B | | | 0.7 | % |
CCC | | | 0.7 | % |
Not Rated | | | 1.0 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
• Number of Issues: | | | 79 | |
• Average Maturity: | | | 22.2 | years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | | 19.1 | years |
• Average Call Protection: | | | 9.6 | years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 93.91 | |
• TOB Leverage3 | | | 9.2 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
9
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | ETKYX | | EVKYX | | ECKYX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | -4.31 | % | | | -4.74 | % | | | -4.74 | % |
One Year | | | 0.07 | | | | -0.74 | | | | -0.74 | |
Five Years | | | 1.04 | | | | 0.29 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.05 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.50 | | | | 3.66 | | | | -0.96 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
Six Months | | | -8.86 | % | | | -9.41 | % | | | -5.67 | % |
One Year | | | -4.68 | | | | -5.51 | | | | -1.69 | |
Five Years | | | 0.06 | | | | -0.04 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.29 | | | | 2.05 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.17 | | | | 3.66 | | | | -0.96 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 12/23/91; Class C: 3/23/06 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 0.80 | % | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.55 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 4.81 | % | | | 4.08 | % | | | 4.08 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 7.87 | | | | 6.68 | | | | 6.68 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.20 | | | | 3.65 | | | | 3.66 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 6.87 | | | | 5.97 | | | | 5.99 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Long 22+ Index |
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
Six Months | | | -2.89 | % |
One Year | | | 1.72 | |
Five Years | | | 1.66 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.19 | |
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.03% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.90% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 151, 148, 133 and 114 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
10
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution1
By total investments
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
Fund Statistics
| | | |
• Number of Issues: | | 50 | |
• Average Maturity: | | 18.2 | years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 15.3 | years |
• Average Call Protection: | | 7.0 | years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $86.59 | |
11
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Robert B. MacIntosh, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | ETLAX | | EVLAX | | ELACX |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | -7.49 | % | | | -7.86 | % | | | -7.85 | % |
One Year | | | -2.66 | | | | -3.48 | | | | -3.38 | |
Five Years | | | 0.81 | | | | 0.07 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 3.02 | | | | 2.24 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.74 | | | | 3.69 | | | | -8.26 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
Six Months | | | -11.91 | % | | | -12.36 | % | | | -8.75 | % |
One Year | | | -7.24 | | | | -8.11 | | | | -4.30 | |
Five Years | | | -0.16 | | | | -0.26 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.52 | | | | 2.24 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.41 | | | | 3.69 | | | | -8.26 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 2/14/94; Class B: 10/2/92; Class C: 12/4/07 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expense Ratio | | | 0.87 | % | | | 1.62 | % | | | 1.62 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rate3 | | | 5.19 | % | | | 4.47 | % | | | 4.46 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 8.49 | | | | 7.32 | | | | 7.30 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.82 | | | | 4.31 | | | | 4.35 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 7.89 | | | | 7.05 | | | | 7.12 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
|
Six Months | | | -2.89 | % |
One Year | | | 1.72 | |
Five Years | | | 1.66 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.19 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.15% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.90% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 151, 148, 133 and 114 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
12
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*Yield1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by spe cial purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is AA-. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 42.9 | % |
AA | | | 8.6 | % |
A | | | 33.8 | % |
BBB | | | 12.7 | % |
Not Rated | | | 2.0 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | |
• Number of Issues: | | 52 | |
• Average Maturity: | | 23.6 | years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 21.5 | years |
• Average Call Protection: | | 7.7 | years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $86.09 | |
• TOB Leverage3: | | 0.8 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
13
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Craig R. Brandon, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | ETMDX | | EVMYX | | ECMDX | | EIMDX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | -7.60 | % | | | -7.87 | % | | | -7.96 | % | | | -7.50 | % |
One Year | | | -2.11 | | | | -2.86 | | | | -2.86 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 0.58 | | | | -0.15 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.65 | | | | 1.88 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.40 | | | | 3.60 | | | | -2.05 | | | | -1.94 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | |
Six Months | | | -11.95 | % | | | -12.37 | % | | | -8.86 | % | | | -7.50 | % |
One Year | | | -6.77 | | | | -7.52 | | | | -3.79 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | -0.40 | | | | -0.48 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.15 | | | | 1.88 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.07 | | | | 3.60 | | | | -2.05 | | | | -1.94 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/10/93; Class B: 2/3/92; Class C: 5/2/06; Class I: 3/3/08 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.00 | % | | | 1.75 | % | | | 1.76 | % | | | 0.81 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 5.22 | % | | | 4.47 | % | | | 4.47 | % | | | 5.43 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 8.57 | | | | 7.34 | | | | 7.34 | | | | 8.91 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.37 | | | | 3.83 | | | | 3.82 | | | | 4.79 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 7.17 | | | | 6.28 | | | | 6.27 | | | | 7.86 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Maryland Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
|
Six Months | | | -4.29 | % |
One Year | | | -0.41 | |
Five Years | | | 1.55 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.21 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.23% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 39.06% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Maryland Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 36, 33, 28 and 21 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
14
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*Yield1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by spe cial purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is AA-. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 24.7 | % |
AA | | | 29.5 | % |
A | | | 30.4 | % |
BBB | | | 9.9 | % |
Not Rated | | | 5.5 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
• Number of Issues: | | | 76 | |
• Average Maturity: | | 22.9 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 19.1 years |
• Average Call Protection: | | 8.5 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 92.29 | |
• TOB Leverage3 | | | 3.7 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
15
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Cynthia J. Clemson
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | ETMOX | | EVMOX | | ECMOX |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months | | | -5.65 | % | | | -6.14 | % | | | -6.05 | % |
One Year | | | 0.10 | | | | -0.78 | | | | -0.67 | |
Five Years | | | 1.09 | | | | 0.35 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 3.22 | | | | 2.43 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.99 | | | | 4.21 | | | | -1.57 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months | | | -10.15 | % | | | -10.74 | % | | | -6.97 | % |
One Year | | | -4.65 | | | | -5.55 | | | | -1.63 | |
Five Years | | | 0.12 | | | | 0.02 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.72 | | | | 2.43 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.65 | | | | 4.21 | | | | -1.57 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 5/1/92; Class C: 2/16/06 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expense Ratio | | | 0.84 | % | | | 1.59 | % | | | 1.60 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rate3 | | | 4.70 | % | | | 3.97 | % | | | 3.97 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 7.69 | | | | 6.50 | | | | 6.50 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.07 | | | | 3.52 | | | | 3.51 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 6.66 | | | | 5.76 | | | | 5.74 | |
Index Performance
6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages
7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Missouri Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
Six Months | | | -3.56 | % |
One Year | | | 1.15 | |
Five Years | | | 1.48 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.29 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.08% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.90% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Missouri Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 16, 16, 14 and 12 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
16
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by spe cial purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is AA. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 31.8 | % |
AA | | | 40.7 | % |
A | | | 15.6 | % |
BBB | | | 7.7 | % |
B | | | 1.0 | % |
Not Rated | | | 3.2 | % |
| | | | |
• Number of Issues: | | | 92 | |
• Average Maturity: | | | 19.4 years | |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | | 16.2 years | |
• Average Call Protection: | | | 8.7 years | |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 90.58 | |
• TOB Leverage3: | | | 1.0 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
17
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | ETNCX | | EVNCX | | ECNCX | | EINCX |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months | | | -4.83 | % | | | -5.13 | % | | | -5.13 | % | | | -4.60 | % |
One Year | | | 0.28 | | | | -0.43 | | | | -0.43 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 1.05 | | | | 0.32 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.92 | | | | 2.16 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.56 | | | | 3.73 | | | | -0.51 | | | | 0.70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months | | | -9.35 | % | | | -9.78 | % | | | -6.06 | % | | | -4.60 | % |
One Year | | | -4.52 | | | | -5.22 | | | | -1.39 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 0.08 | | | | -0.01 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.42 | | | | 2.16 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.23 | | | | 3.73 | | | | -0.51 | | | | 0.70 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 10/23/91; Class C: 5/2/06; Class I: 3/3/08 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expense Ratio | | | 1.07 | % | | | 1.82 | % | | | 1.82 | % | | | 0.87 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rate3 | | | 4.84 | % | | | 4.10 | % | | | 4.10 | % | | | 5.04 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 8.07 | | | | 6.84 | | | | 6.84 | | | | 8.41 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.08 | | | | 4.10 | | | | 5.04 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 7.69 | | | | 6.80 | | | | 6.84 | | | | 8.41 | |
Index Performance
6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages
7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper North Carolina Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
Six Months | | | -3.85 | % |
One Year | | | 0.27 | |
Five Years | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.32 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.29% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 40.04% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper North Carolina Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 29, 28, 23 and 20 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
18
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is AA. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 35.2 | % |
AA | | | 41.9 | % |
A | | | 15.1 | % |
BBB | | | 5.1 | % |
Not Rated | | | 2.7 | % |
| | | | |
• Number of Issues: | | | 79 | |
• Average Maturity: | | | 21.7 years | |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | | 17.2 years | |
• Average Call Protection: | | | 8.8 years | |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 91.52 | |
• TOB Leverage3: | | | 12.2 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes reflect the effect of TOBs purchased in secondary market transactions. |
19
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | ETORX | | EVORX | | ECORX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | |
Six Months | | | -7.42 | % | | | -7.79 | % | | | -7.78 | % |
One Year | | | -1.80 | | | | -2.47 | | | | -2.46 | |
Five Years | | | 0.30 | | | | -0.42 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.76 | | | | 1.98 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.43 | | | | 3.69 | | | | -2.39 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | |
Six Months | | | -11.77 | % | | | -12.30 | % | | | -8.68 | % |
One Year | | | -6.47 | | | | -7.14 | | | | -3.40 | |
Five Years | | | -0.67 | | | | -0.75 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.26 | | | | 1.98 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.10 | | | | 3.69 | | | | -2.39 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/28/93; Class B: 12/24/91; Class C: 3/2/06 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expense Ratio | | | 0.98 | % | | | 1.73 | % | | | 1.74 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rate3 | | | 5.17 | % | | | 4.42 | % | | | 4.43 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 8.74 | | | | 7.47 | | | | 7.49 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.86 | | | | 4.34 | | | | 4.35 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 8.22 | | | | 7.34 | | | | 7.35 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages 7(Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
|
Six Months | | | -2.89 | % |
One Year | | | 1.72 | |
Five Years | | | 1.66 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.19 | |
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.22% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 40.85% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 151, 148, 133 and 114 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
20
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is AA-. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 13.0 | % |
AA | | | 60.0 | % |
A | | | 12.6 | % |
BBB | | | 5.4 | % |
B | | | 2.4 | % |
CCC | | | 0.6 | % |
Not Rated | | | 6.0 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
• Number of Issues: | | | 85 | |
• Average Maturity: | | 22.4 years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 19.7 years |
• Average Call Protection: | | 10.5 years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 84.15 | |
• TOB Leverage3: | | | 4.9 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
21
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EASCX | | EVSCX | | ECSCX | | EISCX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | |
Six Months | | | -7.16 | % | | | -7.42 | % | | | -7.51 | % | | | -6.95 | % |
One Year | | | 0.44 | | | | -0.33 | | | | -0.45 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 0.78 | | | | 0.08 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 3.02 | | | | 2.25 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.68 | | | | 3.63 | | | | -2.10 | | | | 0.74 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | |
Six Months | | | -11.53 | % | | | -11.94 | % | | | -8.42 | % | | | -6.95 | % |
One Year | | | -4.34 | | | | -5.12 | | | | -1.40 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | -0.20 | | | | -0.26 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.51 | | | | 2.25 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.34 | | | | 3.63 | | | | -2.10 | | | | 0.74 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 2/14/94; Class B: 10/2/92; Class C: 1/12/06; Class I: 3/3/08 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expense Ratio | | | 0.99 | % | | | 1.74 | % | | | 1.74 | % | | | 0.77 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rate3 | | | 5.05 | % | | | 4.30 | % | | | 4.30 | % | | | 5.25 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 8.35 | | | | 7.11 | | | | 7.11 | | | | 8.68 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.68 | | | | 4.16 | | | | 4.16 | | | | 5.12 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 7.74 | | | | 6.88 | | | | 6.88 | | | | 8.47 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
|
Six Months | | | -2.89 | % |
One Year | | | 1.72 | |
Five Years | | | 1.66 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.19 | |
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.22% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 39.55% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 151, 148, 133 and 114 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
22
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is AA-. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 26.4 | % |
BBB | | | 16.2 | % |
AA | | | 20.4 | % |
CCC | | | 0.1 | % |
A | | | 36.9 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
• Number of Issues: | | | 74 | |
• Average Maturity: | | | 22.0 | years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | | 21.3 | years |
• Average Call Protection: | | | 10.4 | years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 87.76 | |
• TOB Leverage3 | | | 5.9 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes reflect the effect of TOBs purchased in secondary market transactions. |
23
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund as of February 28 , 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | ETTNX | | EVTNX | | ECTNX |
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | -8.35 | % | | | -8.66 | % | | | -8.76 | % |
One Year | | | -3.40 | | | | -4.05 | | | | -4.06 | |
Five Years | | | 0.03 | | | | -0.70 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.74 | | | | 1.99 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.53 | | | | 3.66 | | | | -2.62 | |
|
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
Six Months | | | -12.67 | % | | | -13.13 | % | | | -9.65 | % |
One Year | | | -7.99 | | | | -8.66 | | | | -4.98 | |
Five Years | | | -0.95 | | | | -1.03 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.24 | | | | 1.99 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.20 | | | | 3.66 | | | | -2.62 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/9/93; Class B: 8/25/92; Class C: 5/2/06 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expense Ratio | | | 0.83 | % | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.59 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rate3 | | | 5.08 | % | | | 4.31 | % | | | 4.32 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 8.31 | | | | 7.05 | | | | 7.07 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.14 | | | | 3.60 | | | | 3.60 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 6.78 | | | | 5.89 | | | | 5.89 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
Six Months | | | -2.89 | % |
One Year | | | 1.72 | |
Five Years | | | 1.66 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.19 | |
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.09% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.90% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 151, 148, 133 and 114 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
24
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund as of February 28 , 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is AA. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 25.7 | % |
AA | | | 41.7 | % |
A | | | 23.8 | % |
BBB | | | 6.8 | % |
CC | | | 0.2 | % |
Not Rated | | | 1.8 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
• Number of Issues: | | | 69 | |
• Average Maturity: | | | 19.1 | years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | | 15.5 | years |
• Average Call Protection: | | | 8.0 | years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 92.06 | |
• TOB Leverage3: | | | 0.5 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
25
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund as of February 28 , 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | ETVAX | | EVVAX | | ECVAX | | EIVAX |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | -9.73 | % | | | -10.06 | % | | | -10.05 | % | | | -9.60 | % |
One Year | | | -4.84 | | | | -5.53 | | | | -5.42 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | -0.61 | | | | -1.33 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 2.25 | | | | 1.49 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.16 | | | | 3.56 | | | | -3.73 | | | | -4.42 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
Six Months | | | -13.99 | % | | | -14.46 | % | | | -10.93 | % | | | -9.60 | % |
One Year | | | -9.35 | | | | -10.05 | | | | -6.33 | | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | -1.57 | | | | -1.66 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 1.76 | | | | 1.49 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 2.83 | | | | 3.56 | | | | -3.73 | | | | -4.42 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/17/93; Class B: 7/26/91; Class C: 2/8/06; Class I: 3/3/08 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expense Ratio | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 1.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rate3 | | | 5.39 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | | 4.62 | % | | | 5.58 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 8.80 | | | | 7.56 | | | | 7.54 | | | | 9.11 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.77 | | | | 4.25 | | | | 4.28 | | | | 5.21 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 7.79 | | | | 6.94 | | | | 6.99 | | | | 8.50 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital Municipal |
| | Municipal Bond Index | | Bond Long 22+ Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | -6.37 | % |
One Year | | | 5.18 | | | | -0.61 | |
Five Years | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.04 | |
Lipper Averages7(Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Virginia Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
Six Months | | | -4.46 | % |
One Year | | | -0.57 | |
Five Years | | | 1.78 | |
Ten Years | | | 3.35 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 1/1/09. Includes interest expense of 0.37% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.74% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Virginia Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 33, 31, 27 and 23 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
26
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund as of February 28 , 2009
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by spe cial purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution at 2/28/09, is as follows, and the average rating is AA. |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 19.9 | % |
AA | | | 55.3 | % |
A | | | 13.8 | % |
BBB | | | 7.9 | % |
Not Rated | | | 3.1 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
• Number of Issues: | | | 70 | |
• Average Maturity: | | | 22.9 | years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | | 20.9 | years |
• Average Call Protection: | | | 9.5 | years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 93.63 | |
• TOB Leverage3: | | | 6.7 | % |
| | |
1 | | Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. Tender option bond (TOB) leverage represents the amount of TOB Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 2/28/09 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes reflect the effect of TOBs purchased in secondary market transactions. |
27
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in a Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (September 1, 2008 – February 28, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of each table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of each table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in each table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of each table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $962.80 | | | | $4.23 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $959.60 | | | | $7.87 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $959.60 | | | | $7.87 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $963.70 | | | | $3.26 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.50 | | | | $4.36 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.80 | | | | $8.10 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.80 | | | | $8.10 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.50 | | | | $3.36 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.87% for Class A shares, 1.62% for Class B shares, 1.62% for Class C shares and 0.67% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
28
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FUND EXPENSES CONT’D
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $930.00 | | | | $4.12 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $926.80 | | | | $7.69 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $926.80 | | | | $7.69 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.50 | | | | $4.31 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.80 | | | | $8.05 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.80 | | | | $8.05 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.86% for Class A shares, 1.61% for Class B shares and 1.61% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $937.80 | | | | $5.33 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $934.10 | | | | $8.87 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $935.10 | | | | $8.92 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $938.90 | | | | $4.37 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.30 | | | | $5.56 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.60 | | | | $9.25 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.60 | | | | $9.30 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.30 | | | | $4.56 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.11% for Class A shares, 1.85% for Class B shares, 1.86% for Class C shares and 0.91% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
29
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FUND EXPENSES CONT’D
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $956.90 | | | | $3.74 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $952.60 | | | | $7.36 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $952.60 | | | | $7.36 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.00 | | | | $3.86 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.30 | | | | $7.60 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.30 | | | | $7.60 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.77% for Class A shares, 1.52% for Class B shares and 1.52% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $925.10 | | | | $3.82 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $921.40 | | | | $7.38 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $921.50 | | | | $7.29 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.80 | | | | $4.01 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.10 | | | | $7.75 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.20 | | | | $7.65 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.80% for Class A shares, 1.55% for Class B shares and 1.53% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
30
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FUND EXPENSES CONT’D
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $924.00 | | | | $4.91 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $921.30 | | | | $8.48 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $920.40 | | | | $8.48 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $925.00 | | | | $3.87 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.70 | | | | $5.16 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.00 | | | | $8.90 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.00 | | | | $8.90 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.80 | | | | $4.06 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.03% for Class A shares, 1.78% for Class B shares, 1.78% for Class C shares and 0.81% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $943.50 | | | | $4.29 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $938.60 | | | | $7.88 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $939.50 | | | | $7.89 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.40 | | | | $4.46 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.70 | | | | $8.20 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.70 | | | | $8.20 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.89% for Class A shares, 1.64% for Class B shares and 1.64% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
31
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FUND EXPENSES CONT’D
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $951.70 | | | | $4.69 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $948.70 | | | | $8.31 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $948.70 | | | | $8.31 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $954.00 | | | | $3.73 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.00 | | | | $4.86 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.30 | | | | $8.60 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.30 | | | | $8.60 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.00 | | | | $3.86 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.97% for Class A shares, 1.72% for Class B shares, 1.72% for Class C shares and 0.77% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $925.80 | | | | $4.87 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $922.10 | | | | $8.44 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $922.20 | | | | $8.44 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.70 | | | | $5.11 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.00 | | | | $8.85 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.00 | | | | $8.85 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.02% for Class A shares, 1.77% for Class B shares and 1.77% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
32
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FUND EXPENSES CONT’D
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $928.40 | | | | $4.69 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $925.80 | | | | $8.31 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $924.90 | | | | $8.30 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $930.50 | | | | $3.78 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.90 | | | | $4.91 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.20 | | | | $8.70 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.20 | | | | $8.70 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.90 | | | | $3.96 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.98% for Class A shares, 1.74% for Class B shares, 1.74% for Class C shares and 0.79% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $916.50 | | | | $3.94 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $913.40 | | | | $7.50 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $912.40 | | | | $7.49 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.70 | | | | $4.16 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.00 | | | | $7.90 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.00 | | | | $7.90 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.83% for Class A shares, 1.58% for Class B shares and 1.58% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
33
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FUND EXPENSES CONT’D
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (9/1/08) | | | (2/28/09) | | | (9/1/08 – 2/28/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $902.70 | | | | $4.81 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $899.40 | | | | $8.34 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $899.50 | | | | $8.34 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $904.00 | | | | $3.87 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.70 | | | | $5.11 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.00 | | | | $8.85 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.00 | | | | $8.85 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.70 | | | | $4.11 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.02% for Class A shares, 1.77% for Class B shares, 1.77% for Class C shares and 0.82% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on August 31, 2008. | |
34
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 100.1% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 3.0% |
|
$ | 1,500 | | | University of Alabama, 5.00%, 7/1/34 | | $ | 1,501,005 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,501,005 | | | |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 1.7% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/37 | | $ | 845,340 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 845,340 | | | |
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.7% |
|
$ | 1,250 | | | Huntsville, Health Care Authority, Prerefunded to 6/1/11, 5.75%, 6/1/31 | | $ | 1,371,800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,371,800 | | | |
|
|
|
General Obligations — 4.3% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | City of Auburn, 5.25%, 12/1/27 | | $ | 1,037,830 | | | |
| 1,125 | | | Huntsville, 5.25%, 5/1/31 | | | 1,140,683 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,178,513 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 9.7% |
|
$ | 1,740 | | | Alabama Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Ascension Health), 5.00%, 11/15/39(1) | | $ | 1,613,076 | | | |
| 400 | | | Health Care Authority, (Baptist Health), 5.00%, 11/15/16 | | | 389,608 | | | |
| 750 | | | Health Care Authority, (Baptist Health), 5.00%, 11/15/18 | | | 713,055 | | | |
| 400 | | | Health Care Authority, (Baptist Health), 5.00%, 11/15/21 | | | 356,056 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Marshall County, Health Care Authority, 5.75%, 1/1/32 | | | 853,870 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | University of Alabama, Hospital Revenue, 5.75%, 9/1/22 | | | 1,009,100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,934,765 | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 4.1% |
|
$ | 600 | | | Butler, Industrial Development Board, (Georgia-Pacific Corp.), (AMT), 5.75%, 9/1/28 | | $ | 335,472 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Courtland, Solid Waste Disposal, (Champion International Corp.), (AMT), 6.70%, 11/1/29 | | | 718,990 | | | |
| 750 | | | Phoenix County, Industrial Development Board Environmental Improvements, 6.10%, 5/15/30 | | | 477,412 | | | |
| 1,180 | | | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 | | | 526,233 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,058,107 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 12.4% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Alabama State University, (AGC), 4.75%, 5/1/33 | | $ | 477,145 | | | |
| 1,885 | | | Alabama State University, (XLCA), 4.625%, 8/1/36 | | | 1,682,080 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Auburn University, (FSA), 5.00%, 6/1/38 | | | 1,236,637 | | | |
| 1,110 | | | Montgomery, Public Educational Building Authority, (Alabama State University), (XLCA), 5.25%, 10/1/25 | | | 1,132,866 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | University of South Alabama, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 11/15/16 | | | 1,775,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,303,978 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 2.6% |
|
$ | 400 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (BHAC), (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/24(2) | | $ | 420,696 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 885,100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,305,796 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 15.3% |
|
$ | 2,500 | | | Birmingham, Waterworks and Sewer Board, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 1/1/13, 5.25%, 1/1/33 | | $ | 2,820,425 | | | |
| 555 | | | Helena, Utilities Board Water and Sewer, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 4/1/12, 5.25%, 4/1/27 | | | 621,644 | | | |
| 445 | | | Helena, Utilities Board Water and Sewer, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 4/1/12, 5.25%, 4/1/27 | | | 498,436 | | | |
| 550 | | | Helena, Utilities Board Water and Sewer, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 4/1/12, 5.25%, 4/1/33 | | | 616,044 | | | |
| 450 | | | Helena, Utilities Board Water and Sewer, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 4/1/12, 5.25%, 4/1/33 | | | 504,036 | | | |
| 2,065 | | | Montgomery, BMC Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Baptist Health Montgomery), (MBIA), Prerefunded to 11/15/14, 5.15%, 11/15/27 | | | 2,372,892 | | | |
| 330 | | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | | | 360,370 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,793,847 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 9.6% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Gadsden, (AMBAC), 5.125%, 8/1/28 | | $ | 1,924,920 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Homewood, (FSA), 4.25%, 9/1/31 | | | 877,360 | | | |
| 500 | | | Mobile, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 2/15/30 | | | 498,705 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Pell City, (XLCA), 5.00%, 2/1/24 | | | 991,660 | | | |
| 675 | | | Tuscaloosa, (AMBAC), 4.375%, 7/1/37 | | | 592,859 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,885,504 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 5.7% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Birmingham, Care Facility Financing Authority, (Children’s Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 6/1/32 | | $ | 1,630,160 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | East Alabama, Health Care Authority, (MBIA), 5.00%, 9/1/27 | | | 1,255,515 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,885,675 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements35
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 7.8% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Leeds, Public Educational Building Authority, (AGC), 5.125%, 4/1/33 | | $ | 967,050 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Mobile, Public Educational Building Authority, (AMBAC), 4.50%, 3/1/31 | | | 1,114,412 | | | |
| 500 | | | Montgomery County, Public Building Authority, (MBIA), 5.00%, 3/1/31 | | | 496,040 | | | |
| 770 | | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | | | 840,863 | | | |
| 520 | | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (Commonwealth Appropriation), (AMBAC), 5.125%, 6/1/24 | | | 559,203 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,977,568 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 5.6% |
|
$ | 2,800 | | | Alabama Public School and College Authority, (FSA), 2.50%, 12/1/27 | | $ | 1,911,476 | | | |
| 1,825 | | | Birmingham Jefferson, Civic Center Authority, (MBIA), 0.00%, 9/1/18 | | | 944,821 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,856,297 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 3.3% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/16 | | $ | 646,870 | | | |
| 1,185 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/29 | | | 1,052,197 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,699,067 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Utilities — 1.9% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Foley, Utilities Board, (FSA), 4.75%, 11/1/31 | | $ | 945,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 945,500 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 8.1% |
|
$ | 2,410 | | | Alabama Drinking Water Finance Authority, (AMBAC), 4.00%, 8/15/28 | | $ | 1,941,616 | | | |
| 255 | | | Birmingham, Waterworks and Sewer Board, (AMBAC), 4.50%, 1/1/39 | | | 221,827 | | | |
| 800 | | | Birmingham, Waterworks and Sewer Board, (FSA), 4.50%, 1/1/35(3) | | | 728,240 | | | |
| 270 | | | Limestone County, Water and Sewer Authority, (XLCA), 4.25%, 12/1/29 | | | 190,156 | | | |
| 1,240 | | | Madison, Water and Wastewater Board, (XLCA), 4.25%, 12/1/28 | | | 1,042,654 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,124,493 | | | |
|
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 1.0% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Puerto Rico, (Guaynabo Municipal Government Center Lease), 5.625%, 7/1/22 | | $ | 499,990 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 499,990 | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 1.3% |
|
$ | 810 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | $ | 676,439 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 676,439 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 100.1% | | |
(identified cost $53,688,941) | | $ | 50,843,684 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (0.1)% | | $ | (27,820 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 50,815,864 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Alabama municipalities. In addition, 14.4% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2009 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 72.3% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.8% to 25.9% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
|
(2) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(3) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for open swap contracts. |
See notes to financial statements36
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 97.3% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 0.4% |
|
$ | 250 | | | University of Arkansas, 5.00%, 12/1/29 | | $ | 250,460 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 250,460 | | | |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 1.2% |
|
$ | 750 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/25 | | $ | 679,763 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 679,763 | | | |
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.3% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Washington Regional Medical Center), Prerefunded to 2/1/10, 7.375%, 2/1/29 | | $ | 528,590 | | | |
| 750 | | | Baxter County, Community Hospital District, Prerefunded to 9/1/09, 5.625%, 9/1/28 | | | 766,995 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,295,585 | | | |
|
|
|
General Obligations — 8.9% |
|
$ | 750 | | | Arkansas, 4.75%, 6/1/29 | | $ | 759,150 | | | |
| 2,750 | | | Arkansas State College Savings, 0.00%, 6/1/14 | | | 2,388,100 | | | |
| 750 | | | Benton, School District No. 8, 4.80%, 2/1/38 | | | 713,955 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Benton, School District No. 8, 4.85%, 2/1/40 | | | 950,830 | | | |
| 350 | | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Government Facilities, 5.00%, 7/1/36 | | | 276,909 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,088,944 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 3.3% |
|
$ | 800 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (White River Medical Center), 5.60%, 6/1/24 | | $ | 716,960 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Conway, Health Facilities Board Hospital Improvements Revenue, (Conway Regional Medical Center), 6.40%, 8/1/29 | | | 913,520 | | | |
| 250 | | | North Little Rock, Health Facilities Board, (Baptist Health), 5.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 250,820 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,881,300 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 5.3% |
|
$ | 435 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Single Family Mortgage, (GNMA), (AMT), 5.125%, 7/1/24(1) | | $ | 421,271 | | | |
| 1,310 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Single Family Mortgage, (GNMA/FNMA), (AMT), 4.75%, 7/1/32 | | | 1,125,460 | | | |
| 890 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Single Family Mortgage, (GNMA/FNMA), (AMT), 4.80%, 7/1/26 | | | 808,085 | | | |
| 110 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Single Family Mortgage, (GNMA/FNMA), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/29 | | | 104,533 | | | |
| 235 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Single Family Mortgage, (GNMA/FNMA), (AMT), 5.05%, 7/1/31 | | | 212,165 | | | |
| 400 | | | North Little Rock, Residential Housing Facilities, (Parkstone Place), 6.50%, 8/1/21 | | | 362,748 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,034,262 | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 7.0% |
|
$ | 400 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Industrial Facility Revenue, (Potlatch Corp.), (AMT), 7.75%, 8/1/25 | | $ | 316,384 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Baxter, (Aeroquip Corp.), 5.80%, 10/1/13 | | | 2,215,520 | | | |
| 750 | | | Calhoun County, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue, (Georgia-Pacific Corp.), (AMT), 6.375%, 11/1/26 | | | 464,055 | | | |
| 250 | | | Pine Bluff, Environmental Improvements Revenue, (International Paper Co.), (AMT), 6.70%, 8/1/20 | | | 203,892 | | | |
| 1,150 | | | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 | | | 512,854 | | | |
| 475 | | | Virgin Islands Public Financing Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 288,558 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,001,263 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 15.3% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Arkansas State University, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 9/1/35 | | $ | 894,840 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Arkansas State University, (Consolidated Building System), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 4/1/24 | | | 972,080 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Arkansas State University, (Student Fee), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 3/1/32 | | | 1,126,762 | | | |
| 2,155 | | | Pulaski Technical College, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/1/36 | | | 1,819,682 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | University of Arkansas, (Fayetteville Campus), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/1/36 | | | 980,820 | | | |
| 500 | | | University of Arkansas, (Fayetteville Campus), (FGIC), 5.00%, 12/1/32 | | | 493,120 | | | |
| 500 | | | University of Arkansas, (Fayetteville Campus), (MBIA), 4.75%, 11/1/24 | | | 516,545 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | University of Arkansas, (Pine Bluffs Campus), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/35 | | | 982,540 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | University of Arkansas, (UAMS Campus), (MBIA), 5.00%, 11/1/34 | | | 984,290 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,770,679 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 4.3% |
|
$ | 110 | | | North Little Rock, Electric System, (MBIA), 6.50%, 7/1/10 | | $ | 113,731 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | North Little Rock, Electric System, (MBIA), 6.50%, 7/1/15 | | | 1,126,570 | | | |
See notes to financial statements37
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 650 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/30 | | | 588,803 | | | |
| 755 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 668,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,497,354 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.7% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Harrison, Residential Housing Facility Board, Single Family Mortgage, (FGIC), Escrowed to Maturity, 7.40%, 9/1/11(2) | | $ | 570,635 | | | |
| 400 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA), Prerefunded to 7/1/10, 5.25%, 7/1/29(3) | | | 427,913 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 998,548 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 2.3% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Arkansas State College Savings, (FGIC), 0.00%, 6/1/17 | | $ | 362,935 | | | |
| 500 | | | Little Rock, School District, (FSA), 5.25%, 2/1/33 | | | 500,340 | | | |
| 480 | | | Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | | | 452,875 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,316,150 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Health-Miscellaneous — 1.4% |
|
$ | 295 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Public Health Laboratory), (AMBAC), 3.90%, 12/1/24 | | $ | 295,611 | | | |
| 500 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Public Health Laboratory), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/18 | | | 525,410 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 821,021 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 7.2% |
|
$ | 1,140 | | | Heber Springs, Hospital and Health Care Facilities Board, (Baptist Healthcare System), (CIFG), 5.00%, 5/1/26 | | $ | 1,062,685 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Pulaski County, (Children’s Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 3/1/30 | | | 1,368,900 | | | |
| 1,565 | | | Pulaski County, (Children’s Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 3/1/35 | | | 1,375,103 | | | |
| 335 | | | Saline County, Retirement Housing and Healthcare Facilities Board, (Evan Lutheran Good Samaritan), (AMBAC), 5.80%, 6/1/11 | | | 335,781 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,142,469 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 3.6% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Single Family Mortgage, (Donaghey Plaza), (FSA), 5.00%, 6/1/29 | | $ | 1,004,510 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | | | 1,092,030 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,096,540 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 5.0% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Tobacco Settlement Revenue, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/24 | | $ | 447,130 | | | |
| 1,320 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Tobacco Settlement Revenue, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/30 | | | 388,595 | | | |
| 3,500 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Tobacco Settlement Revenue, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/36 | | | 704,725 | | | |
| 7,690 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Tobacco Settlement Revenue, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/46 | | | 840,671 | | | |
| 500 | | | University of Arkansas, Parking Revenue, (MBIA), 5.00%, 7/1/29 | | | 500,485 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,881,606 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 5.4% |
|
$ | 510 | | | Bentonville Sales and Use Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 4.375%, 11/1/27 | | $ | 463,763 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/27 | | | 908,570 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC), 0.00%, 7/1/42 | | | 77,620 | | | |
| 5,790 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | | | 229,863 | | | |
| 1,070 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | | | 96,321 | | | |
| 7,500 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | | | 628,350 | | | |
| 1,695 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | | | 131,702 | | | |
| 600 | | | Springdale Sales and Use Tax Revenue, (FSA), 4.00%, 7/1/27 | | | 583,086 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,119,275 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 2.0% |
|
$ | 1,200 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(3) | | $ | 1,161,858 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,161,858 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements38
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Utilities — 2.3% |
|
$ | 1,435 | | | Benton, Utilities Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 9/1/36 | | $ | 1,351,282 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,351,282 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 9.9% |
|
$ | 515 | | | Arkansas Community Water System, Public Water Authority, (MBIA), 5.00%, 10/1/33 | | $ | 493,195 | | | |
| 500 | | | Arkansas Community Water System, Public Water Authority, (MBIA), 5.00%, 10/1/42 | | | 471,775 | | | |
| 500 | | | Conway, Water Revenue, (FGIC), 5.125%, 12/1/23 | | | 506,570 | | | |
| 1,145 | | | Fort Smith, Water and Sewer, (FSA), 5.00%, 10/1/23 | | | 1,161,099 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Little Rock, Sewer Revenue, (FSA), 4.75%, 6/1/37 | | | 944,970 | | | |
| 450 | | | Little Rock, Sewer Revenue, (FSA), 5.00%, 6/1/31 | | | 447,574 | | | |
| 750 | | | Little Rock, Sewer Revenue, (FSA), 5.00%, 10/1/32 | | | 742,785 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rogers, Water Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 2/1/37 | | | 948,130 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,716,098 | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 0.2% |
|
$ | 7,250 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 | | $ | 96,860 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 96,860 | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 5.3% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Little Rock, Hotel and Restaurant Gross Receipts Tax, 7.375%, 8/1/15 | | $ | 2,341,120 | | | |
| 815 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | | 680,615 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,021,735 | | | |
|
|
|
Transportation — 0.7% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport Authority, (AMT), 5.00%, 2/1/18 | | $ | 415,805 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 415,805 | | | |
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 2.3% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Waste Water System), 5.00%, 6/1/22 | | $ | 1,005,380 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 250 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Waste Water System), 5.50%, 12/1/19 | | $ | 290,307 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,295,687 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 97.3% | | |
(identified cost $61,428,757) | | $ | 55,934,544 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 2.7% | | $ | 1,566,887 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 57,501,431 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative
AMT - Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FNMA - Federal National Mortgage Association
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
GNMA - Government National Mortgage Association
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Arkansas municipalities. In addition, 15.1% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2009 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 62.3% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.1% to 32.3% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for open swap contracts. |
|
(2) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(3) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements39
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 105.4% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 11.0% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Athens-Clarke County Unified Government Development Authority, Educational Facilities, 4.50%, 6/15/38 | | $ | 1,808,520 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Atlanta Development Authority, Educational Facilities, 4.75%, 7/1/27 | | | 880,770 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Atlanta Development Authority, Educational Facilities, 5.00%, 7/1/39 | | | 869,090 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Fulton County, Development Authority, (Georgia Technology Foundation), 5.00%, 11/1/31 | | | 1,502,505 | | | |
| 1,505 | | | Georgia Private Colleges and Universities Authority, (Emory University), 5.00%, 9/1/38 | | | 1,511,773 | | | |
| 1,995 | | | Georgia Private Colleges and Universities Authority, (Emory University), 5.00%, 9/1/38(1) | | | 2,003,997 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,576,655 | | | |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 1.7% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Burke County, Development Authority, (Oglethorpe Power Corp.), 5.50%, 1/1/33 | | $ | 907,000 | | | |
| 450 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/25 | | | 407,858 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,314,858 | | | |
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.7% |
|
$ | 800 | | | Forsyth County, Hospital Authority, (Georgia Baptist Health Care System), Escrowed to Maturity, 6.375%, 10/1/28 | | $ | 933,712 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, Escrowed to Maturity, 6.25%, 7/1/12 | | | 1,147,470 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,081,182 | | | |
|
|
|
General Obligations — 11.0% |
|
$ | 160 | | | Alpharetta, 6.50%, 5/1/10 | | $ | 165,691 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Georgia, 1.00%, 3/1/26(2) | | | 1,116,620 | | | |
| 500 | | | Georgia, 2.00%, 12/1/23 | | | 369,000 | | | |
| 500 | | | Georgia, 2.00%, 8/1/27 | | | 326,740 | | | |
| 6,000 | | | Gwinnett County, School District, 5.00%, 2/1/36(1) | | | 6,103,530 | | | |
| 500 | | | Lagrange-Troup County, Hospital Authority, (West Georgia Health Foundation, Inc.), 5.50%, 7/1/38 | | | 451,980 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,533,561 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 1.3% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Baldwin County, Hospital Authority, (Oconee Regional Medical Center), 5.375%, 12/1/28 | | $ | 321,070 | | | |
| 750 | | | Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital Authority, (Georgia Medical Center), 5.625%, 8/1/34 | | | 653,378 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 974,448 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 5.1% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Georgia Housing and Finance Authority, (AMT), 4.85%, 12/1/37 | | $ | 844,450 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Georgia Housing and Finance Authority, (AMT), 4.90%, 12/1/31 | | | 868,440 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Georgia Housing and Finance Authority, (AMT), 5.25%, 12/1/37 | | | 1,797,980 | | | |
| 600 | | | Georgia Private Colleges and Universities Authority, Student Housing Revenue, (Mercer Housing Corp.), 6.00%, 6/1/31 | | | 446,580 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,957,450 | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 8.9% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Albany Dougherty, Payroll Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Procter and Gamble), (AMT), 5.20%, 5/15/28 | | $ | 1,793,560 | | | |
| 700 | | | Cartersville, Development Authority, (Anheuser-Busch), (AMT), 5.95%, 2/1/32 | | | 578,732 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Cartersville, Development Authority, (Anheuser-Busch), (AMT), 7.375%, 5/1/09 | | | 1,006,400 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Cobb County, Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Georgia Waste Management Project), (AMT), 5.00%, 4/1/33 | | | 761,570 | | | |
| 750 | | | Effingham County, (Solid Waste Disposal), (Fort James Project), (AMT), 5.625%, 7/1/18 | | | 511,568 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 | | | 557,450 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Savannah, Economic Development Authority, (Intercat-Savannah), (AMT), 7.00%, 1/1/38 | | | 714,270 | | | |
| 825 | | | Vienna Water and Sewer, (Cargill), (AMT), 6.00%, 9/1/14 | | | 826,122 | | | |
| 225 | | | Virgin Islands Public Financing Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 136,685 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,886,357 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements40
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 5.8% |
|
$ | 950 | | | Carrollton, Payroll Development Authority, (University of West Georgia), (MBIA), 4.75%, 8/1/30 | | $ | 910,509 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Fulton County, Development Authority, (Morehouse College), (AMBAC), 4.50%, 6/1/37 | | | 874,150 | | | |
| 970 | | | Georgia Private Colleges and Universities Authority, (Agnes Scott College), (MBIA), 4.75%, 6/1/28 | | | 953,112 | | | |
| 1,975 | | | South Regional Joint Development Authority, (Valdosta State University), (XLCA), 5.00%, 8/1/38 | | | 1,783,958 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,521,729 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 7.7% |
|
$ | 480 | | | Georgia Municipal Electric Power Authority, (MBIA), 0.00%, 1/1/12 | | $ | 392,856 | | | |
| 3,005 | | | Georgia Municipal Electric Power Authority, (MBIA), 5.50%, 1/1/20 | | | 3,282,031 | | | |
| 390 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/30 | | | 353,282 | | | |
| 455 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 402,720 | | | |
| 750 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/35 | | | 661,545 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/29 | | | 913,560 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,005,994 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 0.0% |
|
$ | 10 | | | Georgia Municipal Electric Power Authority, (MBIA), Escrowed to various sinking fund dates through 1/1/12, 0.00%, 1/1/12 | | $ | 8,840 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,840 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 1.4% |
|
$ | 660 | | | Fayette County, School District, (FSA), 4.95%, 3/1/25 | | $ | 613,648 | | | |
| 480 | | | Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | | | 452,875 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,066,523 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 2.7% |
|
$ | 1,190 | | | Clarke County Hospital Authority, (Athens Regional Medical Center), (MBIA), 5.00%, 1/1/32 | | $ | 1,080,710 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Henry County, Hospital Authority Revenue, (Henry Medical Center, Inc.), (AMBAC), 6.00%, 7/1/29 | | | 1,011,810 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,092,520 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Housing — 0.4% |
|
$ | 380 | | | Peach County Development Authority, (Fort Valley State University Foundation), (AMBAC), 4.50%, 6/1/37 | | $ | 338,390 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 338,390 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 5.1% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Atlanta, Downtown Development Authority, (MBIA), 4.50%, 12/1/26 | | $ | 972,620 | | | |
| 991 | | | Georgia Local Government Certificate of Participation, (MBIA), 4.75%, 6/1/28 | | | 970,110 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Georgia Municipal Association, Inc, Certificate of Participation, (Riverdale), (AGC), 5.375%, 5/1/32 | | | 1,001,860 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Georgia State University Higher Education Facilities Authority (USG Real Estate Foundation), (AGC), 5.625%, 6/15/38 | | | 1,015,460 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,960,050 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 1.0% |
|
$ | 800 | | | Downtown Savannah Authority, (Savannah Ellis Square Parking), (MBIA), 4.75%, 8/1/32 | | $ | 765,104 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 765,104 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 3.3% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | George L. Smith, (Georgia World Congress Center-Domed Stadium), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | | $ | 941,540 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/34 | | | 566,440 | | | |
| 1,200 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/27 | | | 1,090,284 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,598,264 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 7.9% |
|
$ | 785 | | | Atlanta, Airport Passenger Facility Charge, (FSA), 4.75%, 1/1/28 | | $ | 762,109 | | | |
| 500 | | | Atlanta, Airport Revenue, (FGIC), (AMT), 5.625%, 1/1/25 | | | 473,620 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, (AMBAC), 6.25%, 7/1/20 | | | 1,179,270 | | | |
| 1,600 | | | Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 7/1/34(1) | | | 1,605,320 | | | |
| 1,780 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | | | 1,723,423 | | | |
| 750 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/18 | | | 427,575 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,171,317 | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements41
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 20.5% |
|
$ | 1,180 | | | Atlanta, Water and Wastewater, (FGIC), 5.00%, 11/1/38 | | $ | 988,805 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Atlanta, Water and Wastewater, (FSA), 5.00%, 11/1/34 | | | 1,949,040 | | | |
| 495 | | | Atlanta, Water and Wastewater, (MBIA), 5.00%, 11/1/39 | | | 413,869 | | | |
| 2,100 | | | Columbus, Water and Sewer, (FSA), 5.00%, 5/1/30 | | | 2,107,392 | | | |
| 1,135 | | | Coweta County, Water and Sewer Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 6/1/26 | | | 1,194,145 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | De Kalb County, Water and Sewer, (FSA), 5.25%, 10/1/32 | | | 1,062,830 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Douglasville-Douglas County, Water and Sewer Authority, (MBIA), 5.00%, 6/1/37 | | | 2,950,710 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Henry County, Water and Sewer Authority, (MBIA), 5.25%, 2/1/25 | | | 1,100,190 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Henry County, Water and Sewer Authority, (MBIA), 5.25%, 2/1/30 | | | 1,060,330 | | | |
| 1,040 | | | Newnan, Water, Sewer and Light Commission, (AMBAC), 5.25%, 1/1/24 | | | 1,128,442 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Walton County, Water and Sewer Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 2/1/33 | | | 982,160 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Walton County, Water and Sewer Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 2/1/38 | | | 974,590 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,912,503 | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 1.0% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Main Street National Gas Inc., 5.00%, 3/15/22 | | $ | 754,220 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 754,220 | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 2.2% |
|
$ | 2,020 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | $ | 1,686,922 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,686,922 | | | |
|
|
|
Transportation — 0.2% |
|
$ | 250 | | | Augusta, Airport Revenue, 5.15%, 1/1/35 | | $ | 146,830 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 146,830 | | | |
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 4.5% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Athens-Clarke County, Unified Government Water and Sewer Revenue, 5.50%, 1/1/38 | | $ | 1,033,710 | | | |
| 500 | | | Coweta County, Water and Sewer Authority, 5.00%, 6/1/32 | | | 499,280 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Coweta County, Water and Sewer Authority, 5.00%, 6/1/37 | | | 1,981,900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,514,890 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 105.4% | | |
(identified cost $87,366,895) | | $ | 81,868,607 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (5.4)% | | $ | (4,160,951 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 77,707,656 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Georgia municipalities. In addition, 13.4% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2009 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 53.1% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.1% to 22.7% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
|
(2) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
See notes to financial statements42
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.3% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 2.1% |
|
$ | 1,280 | | | Campbellsville, (Campbellsville University), 5.70%, 3/1/34 | | $ | 1,043,622 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,043,622 | | | |
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 3.3% |
|
$ | 2,250 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Escrowed to Various Dates, Series O, 0.00%, 7/1/17 | | $ | 1,668,848 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,668,848 | | | |
|
|
|
General Obligations — 3.0% |
|
$ | 1,465 | | | Bowling Green, 5.30%, 6/1/19 | | $ | 1,539,656 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,539,656 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 2.3% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Kentucky Economic Development Authority, (Baptist Healthcare System), 5.625%, 8/15/27 | | $ | 501,950 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Murray Hospital Facilities, (Murray Calloway County Hospital), 5.125%, 8/1/37 | | | 670,680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,172,630 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 6.4% |
|
$ | 490 | | | Kentucky Housing Corp., (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/37 | | $ | 424,178 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Kentucky Housing Corp., (AMT), 5.30%, 1/1/38(1) | | | 1,892,640 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Kentucky Housing Corp., (Urban Florence I, L.P.), (AMT), 5.00%, 6/1/35 | | | 950,940 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,267,758 | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 3.0% |
|
$ | 695 | | | Virgin Islands Public Financing Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | $ | 422,205 | | | |
| 1,820 | | | Wickliffe, Solid Waste Disposal, (Westvaco Corp.), (AMT), 6.375%, 4/1/26 | | | 1,108,635 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,530,840 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 4.0% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Lexington-Fayette Urban County, (University of Kentucky, Alumni Association, Inc.), (MBIA), 5.00%, 11/1/18 | | $ | 2,044,340 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,044,340 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 13.3% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Carroll County, Environmental Facilities, (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.75%, 2/1/26 | | $ | 840,860 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Kentucky Municipal Power Agency, (MBIA), 5.25%, 9/1/27 | | | 978,000 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Kentucky Municipal Power Agency, (Prairie Street Project), (MBIA), 5.00%, 9/1/37 | | | 1,801,240 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Owensboro, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 1/1/20 | | | 1,105,760 | | | |
| 1,200 | | | Paducah Electric Plant Board, (AGC), 5.25%, 10/1/35 | | | 1,200,864 | | | |
| 400 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (BHAC), (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/24(2) | | | 420,696 | | | |
| 500 | | | Trimble County, Environmental Facilities, (AMBAC), (AMT), 6.00%, 3/1/37 | | | 401,225 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,748,645 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.1% |
|
$ | 1,000 | �� | | Kentucky Property and Buildings Commission, (FSA), Prerefunded to 8/1/11, 5.00%, 8/1/21 | | $ | 1,087,260 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,087,260 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 3.1% |
|
$ | 600 | | | Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | | $ | 566,094 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Warren County, (Judicial Office Building and Parks), (AMBAC), 5.20%, 9/1/29 | | | 994,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,560,844 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 5.2% |
|
$ | 850 | | | Jefferson County, Health Facilities Authority, (University Medical Center), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/22 | | $ | 746,751 | | | |
| 6,775 | | | Kentucky Economic Development Authority, (Norton Healthcare, Inc.), (MBIA), 0.00%, 10/1/27 | | | 1,895,103 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,641,854 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Industrial Development Revenue — 0.4% |
|
$ | 250 | | | Boone County, (Dayton Power & Light Co. (The)), (FGIC), 4.70%, 1/1/28 | | $ | 216,543 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 216,543 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 14.2% |
|
$ | 1,350 | | | Hardin County, School District Finance Corp. School Building, (FSA), 4.75%, 7/1/21 | | $ | 1,375,110 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Jefferson County, School District Finance Corp. School Building, (FSA), 4.50%, 7/1/23 | | | 1,006,480 | | | |
| 1,150 | | | Kentucky Area Development Districts, (XLCA), 4.70%, 6/1/35 | | | 836,004 | | | |
See notes to financial statements43
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 500 | | | Kentucky Property and Buildings Commission, (AGC), 5.25%, 2/1/29 | | | 509,670 | | | |
| 500 | | | Kentucky Property and Buildings Commission, (FSA), 5.00%, 11/1/26 | | | 506,555 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Louisville, Parking Authority, (MBIA), 5.00%, 6/1/32 | | | 995,840 | | | |
| 865 | | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/21 | | | 808,974 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (XLCA), 5.50%, 7/1/21 | | | 930,350 | | | |
| 255 | | | Wayne County, School District Finance Corp., (MBIA), 4.00%, 7/1/25 | | | 222,589 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,191,572 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 2.0% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, (Louisville Arena), (AGC), 6.00%, 12/1/42 | | $ | 1,020,890 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,020,890 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 7.4% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Louisville Kentucky Regional Airport Authority, (FSA), (AMT), 5.50%, 7/1/38 | | $ | 914,610 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/18 | | | 2,850,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,765,110 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 15.4% |
|
$ | 1,500 | | | Boone-Florence Water Commission, Water Supply System, (FGIC), 5.00%, 12/1/27 | | $ | 1,438,185 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Campbell and Kenton County, District No. 1, (FSA), 5.00%, 8/1/31 | | | 960,870 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Campbell and Kenton County, Sanitation District No. 1, (MBIA), 4.375%, 8/1/35 | | | 1,318,560 | | | |
| 1,060 | | | Kentucky Rural Water Finance Corp., (MBIA), 4.70%, 8/1/35 | | | 993,538 | | | |
| 500 | | | Louisville and Jefferson County, Metropolitan Sewer District and Drainage System, (AGC), 4.25%, 5/15/38 | | | 428,870 | | | |
| 2,250 | | | Louisville and Jefferson County, Metropolitan Sewer District and Drainage System, (FGIC), 5.00%, 5/15/38 | | | 2,159,752 | | | |
| 290 | | | Owensboro, (AGC), 5.00%, 9/15/27 | | | 294,617 | | | |
| 225 | | | Owensboro, (AGC), 5.00%, 9/15/31 | | | 224,089 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,818,481 | | | |
|
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 10.9% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Jefferson County, (Capital Projects Corp.), 0.00%, 8/15/12 | | $ | 923,470 | | | |
| 4,700 | | | Jefferson County, (Capital Projects Corp.), 0.00%, 8/15/15 | | | 3,828,949 | | | |
| 750 | | | Kentucky Property and Buildings Commission, 5.50%, 11/1/28 | | | 773,213 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,525,632 | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 0.2% |
|
$ | 4,200 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 | | $ | 56,112 | | | |
| 7,595 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/55 | | | 50,431 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 106,543 | | | |
|
|
|
Transportation — 1.0% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Kentucky Turnpike Authority, (Revitalization Project), 5.00%, 7/1/28 | | $ | 505,175 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 505,175 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.3% | | |
(identified cost $53,240,007) | | $ | 50,456,243 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.7% | | $ | 371,178 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 50,827,421 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Kentucky municipalities. In addition, 14.5% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2009 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 67.6% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.8% to 23.7% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for open swap contracts. |
|
(2) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
See notes to financial statements44
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 100.6% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 2.2% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/37 | | $ | 845,340 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 845,340 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 10.3% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Franciscan Missionaries), 5.00%, 8/15/33 | | $ | 770,691 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Ochsner Clinic Foundation), 5.50%, 5/15/47 | | | 745,110 | | | |
| 1,120 | | | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Ochsner Clinic Foundation), Prerefunded to 5/15/26, 5.50%, 5/15/32 | | | 1,246,694 | | | |
| 500 | | | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Tuoro Infirmary), 5.625%, 8/15/29 | | | 369,930 | | | |
| 1,010 | | | Tangipahoa Parish, Hospital Service District No. 1, (North Oaks Medical Center), 5.00%, 2/1/30 | | | 742,421 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,874,846 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 6.5% |
|
$ | 1,665 | | | Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, (GNMA/FNMA/FHLMC), (AMT), 4.80%, 12/1/38 | | $ | 1,409,439 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, (GNMA/FNMA/FHLMC), (AMT), 5.20%, 6/1/39 | | | 901,680 | | | |
| 345 | | | Louisiana Housing Finance Authority, Single Family, (GNMA/FNMA), 0.00%, 6/1/27 | | | 120,374 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,431,493 | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 5.1% |
|
$ | 275 | | | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority, (Senior-Air Cargo), (AMT), 6.65%, 1/1/25 | | $ | 217,256 | | | |
| 1,470 | | | St. John Baptist Parish, (Marathon Oil Corp.), 5.125%, 6/1/37 | | | 1,084,757 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Virgin Islands Public Financing Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 607,490 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,909,503 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 17.1% |
|
$ | 425 | | | Lafayette, Public Trust Financing Authority, (Ragin Cajun Facility, Inc.), (MBIA), 5.00%, 10/1/32 | | $ | 389,215 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority, (AMBAC), 4.50%, 10/1/37 | | | 1,252,980 | | | |
| 500 | | | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority, (Louisiana State University Student Housing), (MBIA), 4.75%, 8/1/28 | | | 414,315 | | | |
| 1,185 | | | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Black & Gold Facilities), (CIFG), 4.50%, 7/1/38 | | | 766,328 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Dillard University), (AMBAC), 5.30%, 8/1/26 | | | 1,001,200 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Tulane University), (MBIA), 4.65%, 12/15/32 | | | 907,830 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (University of New Orleans), (MBIA), 4.75%, 3/1/32 | | | 821,390 | | | |
| 850 | | | Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, (AGC), 5.50%, 1/1/34 | | | 863,013 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,416,271 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 3.5% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Rapides Finance Authority, (Cleco Power LLC), (AMBAC), 4.70%, 11/1/36 | | $ | 1,300,540 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,300,540 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.5% |
|
$ | 1,250 | | | Jefferson Parish, Home Mortgage Authority, Single Family, Mortgage Revenue, (FGIC), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 5/1/17(1) | | $ | 930,962 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 930,962 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 7.0% |
|
$ | 2,250 | | | New Orleans, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 9/1/15 | | $ | 1,707,773 | | | |
| 800 | | | New Orleans, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 9/1/16 | | | 573,368 | | | |
| 360 | | | Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | | | 339,656 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,620,797 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 1.6% |
|
$ | 750 | | | Terrebonne Parish, Hospital Service District No. 1, (Terrebonne General Medical Center), (AMBAC), 5.50%, 4/1/33 | | $ | 612,398 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 612,398 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Industrial Development Revenue — 3.0% |
|
$ | 1,250 | | | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority, (BRCC Facility Corp.), (MBIA), 5.00%, 12/1/32 | | $ | 1,144,350 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,144,350 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements45
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 1.8% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Calcasieu Parish Public Trust Authority Student Lease, (McNeese Student Housing), (MBIA), 5.25%, 5/1/33 | | $ | 418,430 | | | |
| 300 | | | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority, (Jefferson Parking Garage), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 9/1/31 | | | 270,390 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 688,820 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 5.9% |
|
$ | 425 | | | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority, (Capital and Equipment Acquisition), (AMBAC), 4.50%, 12/1/18 | | $ | 437,125 | | | |
| 700 | | | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority, (Parking Facility Corp. Garage), (AMBAC), 5.375%, 10/1/31 | | | 676,431 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority, (AMBAC), (BHAC), 4.50%, 12/1/18 | | | 1,090,680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,204,236 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 6.5% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | East Baton Rouge Parish, Sales Tax Revenue, (AGC), 5.25%, 8/1/28 | | $ | 1,020,080 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Louisiana Gas and Fuels Tax, (FSA), 5.00%, 5/1/36 | | | 991,120 | | | |
| 1,525 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | | | 60,542 | | | |
| 280 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | | | 25,206 | | | |
| 560 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | | | 46,917 | | | |
| 445 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | | | 34,576 | | | |
| 300 | | | Saint Tammany Parish, Sales Tax District No. 3, (CIFG), 5.00%, 6/1/30 | | | 268,506 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,446,947 | | | |
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 10.9% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority, (FSA), (AMT), 5.75%, 1/1/28 | | $ | 976,320 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | New Orleans Aviation Board, (FSA), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/38 | | | 1,257,690 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Port New Orleans Board of Commissioners, (AGC), 5.125%, 4/1/38 | | | 1,282,065 | | | |
| 620 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(2) | | | 600,293 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,116,368 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 8.5% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Bossier City, Utilities Revenue, (BHAC), 5.50%, 10/1/38 | | $ | 1,034,600 | | | |
| 1,350 | | | East Baton Rouge, Sewer Commission, (FSA), 4.50%, 2/1/36 | | | 1,224,720 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Louisiana Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority, (Denham Springs), (AGC), 4.875%, 12/1/38 | | | 948,090 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,207,410 | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 2.9% |
|
$ | 6,995 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 | | $ | 93,453 | | | |
| 3,015 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/55 | | | 20,020 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 5.875%, 5/15/39 | | | 969,195 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,082,668 | | | |
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.3% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Louisiana Housing Finance Authority, (Saint Dominic Assisted Care Facility), (GNMA), 6.85%, 9/1/25 | | $ | 500,255 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 500,255 | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 2.2% |
|
$ | 1,010 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | $ | 843,461 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 843,461 | | | |
|
|
|
Transportation — 1.8% |
|
$ | 675 | | | Louisiana Offshore Terminal Authority, Deepwater Port Revenue, (Loop LLC), 5.20%, 10/1/18 | | $ | 675,149 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 675,149 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 100.6% | | |
(identified cost $42,472,317) | | $ | 37,851,814 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (0.6)% | | $ | (218,214 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 37,633,600 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements46
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHLMC - Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA - Federal National Mortgage Association
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
GNMA - Government National Mortgage Association
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Louisiana municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 67.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.5% to 23.7% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(2) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements47
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.2% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Cogeneration — 1.1% |
|
$ | 1,250 | | | Maryland Energy Cogeneration, (AES Warrior Run), (AMT), 7.40%, 9/1/19 | | $ | 941,900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 941,900 | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 10.4% |
|
$ | 4,000 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Johns Hopkins University), 5.00%, 7/1/32 | | $ | 3,983,360 | | | |
| 2,250 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola College), 4.75%, 10/1/33 | | | 1,922,737 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola College), 5.125%, 10/1/45 | | | 1,323,315 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Maryland Institute College of Art), 5.00%, 6/1/36 | | | 1,104,615 | | | |
| 400 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Washington Christian Academy), 5.50%, 7/1/38 | | | 206,124 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, (Our Lady of Good Counsel High School), 6.00%, 5/1/35 | | | 658,740 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,198,891 | | | |
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 8.4% |
|
$ | 1,195 | | | Baltimore County, Economic Development Revenue, (Revisions, Inc.), Prerefunded to 8/15/11, 8.50%, 8/15/25 | | $ | 1,394,410 | | | |
| 1,125 | | | Baltimore, SFMR, (Inner Harbor), Escrowed to Maturity, 8.00%, 12/1/10 | | | 1,258,192 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Johns Hopkins Hospital), Prerefunded to 11/15/13, 5.125%, 11/15/34 | | | 2,276,540 | | | |
| 500 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Maryland Institute College of Art), Prerefunded to 6/1/11, 5.50%, 6/1/21 | | | 543,715 | | | |
| 1,300 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Maryland Institute College of Art), Prerefunded to 6/1/11, 5.50%, 6/1/32 | | | 1,413,659 | | | |
| 425 | | | Westminster, Educational Facilities, (McDaniel College), Prerefunded to 10/1/12, 5.50%, 4/1/27 | | | 483,386 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,369,902 | | | |
|
|
|
General Obligations — 12.4% |
|
$ | 1,140 | | | Anne Arundel County, Water and Sewer Construction, 4.50%, 4/1/29 | | $ | 1,128,794 | | | |
| 500 | | | Anne Arundel County, Water and Sewer Construction, 4.625%, 4/1/33 | | | 490,365 | | | |
| 500 | | | Baltimore County, (Metropolitan District), 4.25%, 9/1/36 | | | 442,840 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Baltimore County, (Metropolitan District), 5.00%, 2/1/31(1) | | | 2,053,540 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Montgomery County, 5.00%, 5/1/23 | | | 1,074,890 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Montgomery County, 5.00%, 5/1/25 | | | 1,587,570 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Montgomery County, 5.25%, 10/1/19 | | | 1,059,910 | | | |
| 2,235 | | | Prince George’s County, Housing Authority, 5.00%, 7/15/23 | | | 2,391,785 | | | |
| 1,100 | | | Puerto Rico, 0.00%, 7/1/16 | | | 711,557 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,941,251 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 9.7% |
|
$ | 1,500 | | | Baltimore County, (Catholic Health Initiatives), 4.50%, 9/1/33 | | $ | 1,237,395 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Calvert Health System), 5.50%, 7/1/36 | | | 883,810 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Medstar Health), 4.75%, 5/15/42 | | | 1,086,825 | | | |
| 2,330 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Peninsula Regional Medical Center), 5.00%, 7/1/36 | | | 1,930,638 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Union Hospital of Cecil County), 5.00%, 7/1/40 | | | 809,250 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University of Maryland Medical System), 5.00%, 7/1/41 | | | 1,984,525 | | | |
| 750 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Washington County Hospital), 5.75%, 1/1/38 | | | 576,907 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,509,350 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 6.3% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Maryland Community Development Administration, (AMT), 5.10%, 9/1/37 | | $ | 890,240 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Maryland Community Development Administration, Multifamily Housing, (AMT), 4.70%, 9/1/37 | | | 830,580 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Maryland Community Development Administration, Multifamily Housing, (AMT), 4.85%, 9/1/37 | | | 848,650 | | | |
See notes to financial statements48
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Housing (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Maryland Community Development Administration, Multifamily Housing, (AMT), 4.85%, 9/1/47 | | | 1,663,720 | | | |
| 500 | | | Maryland Economic Development Corp., (Towson University), 5.00%, 7/1/39 | | | 303,520 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Prince George’s County, Housing Authority, (Langely Gardens), (AMT), 5.875%, 2/20/39 | | | 1,000,050 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,536,760 | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 2.0% |
|
$ | 985 | | | Maryland Economic Development Authority, (AFCO Cargo), (AMT), 6.50%, 7/1/24 | | $ | 720,882 | | | |
| 215 | | | Maryland Economic Development Authority, (AFCO Cargo), (AMT), 7.34%, 7/1/24 | | | 173,785 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Maryland Economic Development Corp., (Waste Management, Inc.), (AMT), 4.60%, 4/1/16 | | | 866,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,760,917 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 1.6% |
|
$ | 1,200 | | | Morgan State University, Academic and Facilities, (MBIA), 6.10%, 7/1/20 | | $ | 1,417,104 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,417,104 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 5.7% |
|
$ | 3,145 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Helix Health Issue), (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.00%, 7/1/27 | | $ | 3,374,491 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA), Prerefunded to 7/1/12, 5.125%, 7/1/26 | | | 1,690,695 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,065,186 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 1.0% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/29 | | $ | 887,930 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 887,930 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 10.3% |
|
$ | 2,500 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Lifebridge Health), (AGC), 4.75%, 7/1/42(2) | | $ | 2,065,212 | | | |
| 50 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Lifebridge Health), (AGC), 4.75%, 7/1/42 | | | 41,303 | | | |
| 4,655 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Medlantic/Helix Issue), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 8/15/38 | | | 3,919,557 | | | |
| 3,150 | | | Puerto Rico, Industrial Tourist Educational Medical & Environment Control Facilities Authority, (Auxilio Mutuo Obligated Group), (MBIA), 6.25%, 7/1/24 | | $ | 3,063,501 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,089,573 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Housing — 1.0% |
|
$ | 1,530 | | | Maryland Economic Development Corp., (University of Maryland), (CIFG), 4.50%, 6/1/35 | | $ | 897,590 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 897,590 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 2.6% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Baltimore, (Baltimore Hotel Corp.), (XLCA), 5.25%, 9/1/39 | | $ | 1,203,120 | | | |
| 550 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/28 | | | 129,421 | | | |
| 1,325 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/29 | | | 283,656 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/34 | | | 283,220 | | | |
| 300 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 33,966 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC), 0.00%, 7/1/30 | | | 390,920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,324,303 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 13.4% |
|
$ | 980 | | | Maryland Transportation Authority, (FSA), 4.50%, 7/1/41 | | $ | 907,392 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Maryland Transportation Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 7/1/28 | | | 1,021,080 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Maryland Transportation Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 7/1/36 | | | 1,516,650 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Maryland Transportation Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 7/1/38 | | | 1,009,600 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Maryland Transportation Authority, (FSA), 5.00%, 7/1/41(2) | | | 2,010,260 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Maryland Transportation Authority, Baltimore-Washington International Airport, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 3/1/27 | | | 1,484,190 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Maryland Transportation Authority, Baltimore-Washington International Airport, (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.25%, 3/1/27 | | | 1,321,500 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/32 | | | 2,530,260 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,800,932 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements49
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 5.8% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Baltimore, (Water Projects), (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.125%, 7/1/42 | | $ | 491,720 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Baltimore, Wastewater, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/32 | | | 1,232,975 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Baltimore, Wastewater, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.00%, 7/1/22 | | | 1,059,500 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Baltimore, Wastewater, (MBIA), 5.65%, 7/1/20 | | | 2,348,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,132,395 | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 2.4% |
|
$ | 15,520 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 | | $ | 207,347 | | | |
| 10,110 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/55 | | | 67,130 | | | |
| 895 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Board of Child Care), 5.375%, 7/1/32 | | | 816,267 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Board of Child Care), 5.625%, 7/1/22 | | | 1,016,650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,107,394 | | | |
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.1% |
|
$ | 375 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Edenwald), 5.40%, 1/1/37 | | $ | 235,920 | | | |
| 325 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (King Farm Presbyterian Community), 5.00%, 1/1/17 | | | 248,420 | | | |
| 750 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Mercy Ridge), 4.75%, 7/1/34 | | | 484,935 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 969,275 | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 4.0% |
|
$ | 750 | | | Baltimore, (Clipper Mill), 6.25%, 9/1/33 | | $ | 506,107 | | | |
| 500 | | | Baltimore, (Strathdale Manor), 7.00%, 7/1/33 | | | 373,690 | | | |
| 800 | | | Frederick County, Urbana Community Development Authority, 6.625%, 7/1/25 | | | 606,408 | | | |
| 2,425 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | | 2,025,142 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,511,347 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.2% | | |
(identified cost $98,031,694) | | $ | 87,462,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.8% | | $ | 713,020 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 88,175,020 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
SFMR - Single Family Mortgage Revenue
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Maryland municipalities. In addition, 14.0% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2009 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 41.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.0% to 13.8% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(2) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements50
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 98.3% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 4.6% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Curators University System Facilities Revenue, (University of Missouri), 5.00%, 11/1/33 | | $ | 1,994,240 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Washington University), 4.50%, 1/15/41(1) | | | 1,403,640 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Washington University), 5.375%, 3/15/39 | | | 1,043,270 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,441,150 | | | |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 0.4% |
|
$ | 450 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/25 | | $ | 407,858 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 407,858 | | | |
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.8% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Lees Summit Industrial Development Authority, Health Facility, (John Knox Village), Prerefunded to 8/15/12, 5.70%, 8/15/22 | | $ | 567,320 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Saint Louis County, Mortgage Revenue, (GNMA), (AMT), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.40%, 1/1/16 | | | 1,146,460 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,713,780 | | | |
|
|
|
General Obligations — 3.2% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Clay County, Public School District, 5.00%, 3/1/28 | | $ | 1,013,760 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Jackson County, Reorganized School District No. 7, 5.00%, 3/1/28 | | | 1,022,560 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Kansas City, 4.75%, 2/1/25 | | | 1,035,970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,072,290 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 6.6% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Cape Girardeau County, Industrial Development Authority, (Southeast Missouri Hospital Association), 5.00%, 6/1/36 | | $ | 709,130 | | | |
| 400 | | | Joplin Industrial Development Authority, (Freeman Health Systems), 5.375%, 2/15/35 | | | 300,668 | | | |
| 1,950 | | | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Barnes Jewish Christian Hospital), 5.25%, 5/15/14 | | | 2,128,522 | | | |
| 870 | | | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Freeman Health Systems), 5.25%, 2/15/18 | | | 836,009 | | | |
| 495 | | | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Lake of the Ozarks General Hospital), 6.50%, 2/15/21 | | | 458,717 | | | |
| 250 | | | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Lake Regional Health System), 5.70%, 2/15/34 | | | 200,368 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (SSM Healthcare), 5.00%, 6/1/36 | | | 915,890 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | West Plains Industrial Development Authority, (Ozarks Medical Center), 5.65%, 11/15/22 | | | 894,100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,443,404 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 1.7% |
|
$ | 885 | | | Jefferson County Industrial Development Authority, Multifamily, (Riverview Bend Apartments), (AMT), 6.75%, 11/1/29 | | $ | 704,982 | | | |
| 85 | | | Missouri Housing Development Authority, SFMR, (GNMA), (AMT), 6.45%, 9/1/27 | | | 85,039 | | | |
| 505 | | | Missouri Housing Development Commission, (AMT), 5.05%, 1/1/24 | | | 481,866 | | | |
| 395 | | | Missouri Housing Development Commission, SFMR, (GNMA), (AMT), 5.00%, 9/1/37 | | | 346,715 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,618,602 | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 3.9% |
|
$ | 1,080 | | | Missouri Development Finance Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Procter and Gamble Paper Products), (AMT), 5.20%, 3/15/29 | | $ | 1,038,366 | | | |
| 1,200 | | | Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority, (American Cyanamid), 5.80%, 9/1/09 | | | 1,220,136 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Saint Louis, Industrial Development Authority, (Anheuser Busch Sewer and Solid Waste Disposal Facilities), (AMT), 4.875%, 3/1/32 | | | 1,370,880 | | | |
| 300 | | | Virgin Islands Public Financing Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 182,247 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,811,629 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 3.5% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Lincoln University Auxiliary System Revenue, (AGC), 5.125%, 6/1/37 | | $ | 958,890 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (St. Louis University), (AMBAC), 4.75%, 10/1/24 | | | 940,060 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Missouri State University Auxiliary Enterprise System, (XLCA), 5.00%, 4/1/25 | | | 1,511,850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,410,800 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements51
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 13.9% |
|
$ | 1,240 | | | Columbia Electric Utility Improvement Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 10/1/28 | | $ | 1,247,725 | | | |
| 2,250 | | | Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority, (Union Electric), (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.45%, 10/1/28 | | | 1,992,442 | | | |
| 1,240 | | | Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, (AMBAC), 4.50%, 1/1/36 | | | 1,087,468 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/1/42 | | | 938,730 | | | |
| 2,715 | | | Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, (AMBAC), (BHAC), 4.50%, 1/1/37 | | | 2,523,538 | | | |
| 800 | | | Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, (MBIA), 5.00%, 1/1/26 | | | 666,672 | | | |
| 390 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/30 | | | 353,282 | | | |
| 455 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 402,721 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/29 | | | 913,560 | | | |
| 1,200 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/16 | | | 1,195,608 | | | |
| 2,370 | | | Springfield, Public Utility, (FGIC), 4.50%, 8/1/36(2) | | | 2,195,070 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,516,816 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 7.8% |
|
$ | 3,590 | | | Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Lester Cox Medical Center), (MBIA), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 9/1/20 | | $ | 2,112,535 | | | |
| 205 | | | Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Lester Cox Medical Center), (MBIA), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 9/1/21 | | | 112,971 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Puerto Rico, (FGIC), Prerefunded to 7/1/12, 5.00%, 7/1/32 | | | 2,227,120 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 7/1/13, 5.00%, 7/1/32 | | | 1,135,590 | | | |
| 750 | | | Saint Louis Airport, (Capital Improvement Program), (MBIA), Prerefunded to 7/1/12, 5.00%, 7/1/32 | | | 832,058 | | | |
| 625 | | | Saint Louis, Board of Education, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 4/1/16, 5.00%, 4/1/25 | | | 716,144 | | | |
| 375 | | | Saint Louis, Board of Education, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 4/1/16, 5.00%, 4/1/25 | | | 429,686 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,566,104 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 7.2% |
|
$ | 1,200 | | | Jackson County, Consolidated School District No. 002 (Missouri Direct Deposit), (MBIA), 5.00%, 3/1/27 | | $ | 1,216,992 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Kansas City, (MBIA), 5.00%, 2/1/27 | | | 1,033,670 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Platte County Reorganized School District No. R-3, (FSA), 5.00%, 3/1/25 | | | 1,029,110 | | | |
| 1,900 | | | Saint Charles County, Francis Howell School District, (FGIC), (MBIA), 0.00%, 3/1/16 | | | 1,475,616 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Saint Charles County, Francis Howell School District, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 3/1/21 | | | 1,144,190 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Springfield, School District No. R-12, (FSA), 5.25%, 3/1/25 | | | 1,039,670 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,939,248 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 5.1% |
|
$ | 5,910 | | | Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Lester Cox Medical Center), (MBIA), 0.00%, 9/1/20 | | $ | 3,385,130 | | | |
| 335 | | | Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Lester Cox Medical Center), (MBIA), 0.00%, 9/1/21 | | | 178,407 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | North Kansas City, (North Kansas City Memorial Hospital), (FSA), 5.125%, 11/15/33 | | | 1,380,690 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,944,227 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Industrial Development Revenue — 1.8% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Kansas City, Industrial Development Authority, (AMBAC), 4.50%, 12/1/32 | | $ | 1,772,720 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,772,720 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 10.6% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Cape Girardeau County, Building Corp., (Jackson R-II School District), (MBIA), 5.25%, 3/1/25 | | $ | 1,022,930 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Cape Girardeau County, Building Corp., (Jackson R-II School District), (MBIA), 5.25%, 3/1/26 | | | 1,016,990 | | | |
| 1,970 | | | Jackson County, (Harry S. Truman Sports Complex), (AMBAC), 4.50%, 12/1/31 | | | 1,753,359 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Jackson County, Leasehold Revenue, (Truman Sports), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/20 | | | 549,700 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Jackson County, Leasehold Revenue, (Truman Sports), (MBIA), 5.00%, 12/1/27 | | | 2,014,160 | | | |
| 2,270 | | | Kansas City, Leasehold Revenue, (Municipal Assistance), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 4/15/26 | | | 899,283 | | | |
| 2,105 | | | Kansas City, Leasehold Revenue, (Municipal Assistance), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 4/15/30 | | | 635,268 | | | |
| 240 | | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/36 | | | 206,758 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | | | 1,092,030 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Saint Louis, Industrial Development Authority, (Convention Center Hotel), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/15/19 | | | 1,142,140 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,332,618 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements52
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 0.8% |
|
$ | 750 | | | Missouri Development Finance Authority, Cultural Facility, (Nelson Gallery Foundation), (MBIA), 5.25%, 12/1/22 | | $ | 774,622 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 774,622 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 6.9% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Bi-State Development Agency, Missouri and Illinois Metropolitan District, (Metrolink Cross County), (FSA), 5.00%, 10/1/32 | | $ | 489,130 | | | |
| 2,350 | | | Bi-State Development Agency, Missouri and Illinois Metropolitan District, (Saint Clair County Metrolink), (FSA), 5.25%, 7/1/28(3) | | | 2,488,251 | | | |
| 1,955 | | | Howard Bend, Levee District, (XLCA), 5.25%, 3/1/28 | | | 1,690,449 | | | |
| 600 | | | Kansas City, (Blue Parkway Town Center), (MBIA), 5.00%, 7/1/27 | | | 494,808 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Kansas City, Special Obligations, (AGC), 5.00%, 3/1/28 | | | 1,001,430 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/34 | | | 566,440 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,730,508 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 4.8% |
|
$ | 2,060 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(4) | | $ | 1,994,523 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/29 | | | 887,930 | | | |
| 910 | | | Saint Louis Airport, (Lambert International Airport), (FGIC), (MBIA), (AMT), 6.00%, 7/1/14 | | | 942,441 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Saint Louis Airport, (Lambert International Airport), (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/31 | | | 855,710 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,680,604 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 0.7% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority, (Missouri — American Water Co.), (AMBAC), (AMT), 4.60%, 12/1/36 | | $ | 714,790 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 714,790 | | | |
|
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 0.5% |
|
$ | 500 | | | St. Joseph, Industrial Development Authority, (Sewage Systems Improvements Project), 5.00%, 4/1/27 | | $ | 453,695 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 453,695 | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 2.5% |
|
$ | 2,500 | | | Missouri Development Finance Board Cultural Facilities Revenue, (Kauffman Center), 4.75%, 6/1/37 | | $ | 2,413,100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,413,100 | | | |
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 3.8% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Kansas City, Industrial Development Revenue, (Kingswood Manor), 5.80%, 11/15/17 | | $ | 799,720 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Lees Summit Industrial Development Authority, Health Facility, (John Knox Village), 5.125%, 8/15/32 | | | 664,760 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Missouri State Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Lutheran Senior Services), 5.125%, 2/1/27 | | | 1,479,420 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | St. Louis County, Industrial Development Authority, Series A, (Friendship Village West County), 5.50%, 9/1/28 | | | 771,790 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,715,690 | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 2.6% |
|
$ | 600 | | | Kansas City, Tax Increment Revenue, (Maincor Projects), Series A, 5.25%, 3/1/18 | | $ | 499,710 | | | |
| 2,425 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | | 2,025,142 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,524,852 | | | |
|
|
|
Transportation — 1.6% |
|
$ | 270 | | | Branson, Regional Airport Transportation Development District, (Branson Airport LLC), (AMT), 6.00%, 7/1/25 | | $ | 182,898 | | | |
| 525 | | | Branson, Regional Airport Transportation Development District, (Branson Airport LLC), (AMT), 6.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 322,912 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, 5.00%, 5/1/26 | | | 1,038,210 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,544,020 | | | |
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 2.0% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Kansas City Water Revenue, 5.25%, 12/1/32(5) | | $ | 500,335 | | | |
| 510 | | | Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority, (Revolving Fund Program), 7.20%, 7/1/16 | | | 512,453 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements53
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Water and Sewer (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 1,000 | | | Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority, (Revolving Fund Program), Water Pollution Control, 0.00%, 1/1/14 | | $ | 873,560 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,886,348 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 98.3% | | |
(identified cost $101,119,899) | | $ | 95,429,475 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 1.7% | | $ | 1,681,834 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 97,111,309 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
GNMA - Government National Mortgage Association
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
SFMR - Single Family Mortgage Revenue
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Missouri municipalities. In addition, 13.8% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2009 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 64.3% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.3% to 25.6% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(2) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities. |
|
(3) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for open swap contracts. |
|
(4) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
|
(5) | | When-issued security. |
See notes to financial statements54
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 107.2% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 9.9% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Duke University), 4.50%, 10/1/40 | | $ | 1,875,380 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Duke University), 5.00%, 10/1/38(1) | | | 5,079,050 | | | |
| 260 | | | North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Duke University), 5.125%, 10/1/41 | | | 261,648 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 0.00%, 8/1/17 | | | 935,075 | | | |
| 1,980 | | | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 0.00%, 8/1/21 | | | 1,145,133 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,296,286 | | | |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 9.6% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, 6.75%, 1/1/24 | | $ | 2,103,260 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, 6.75%, 1/1/26 | | | 1,260,700 | | | |
| 3,500 | | | North Carolina Municipal Power Agency, (Catawba), 6.50%, 1/1/20 | | | 3,580,990 | | | |
| 500 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 422,670 | | | |
| 625 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.50%, 7/1/38 | | | 569,269 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Wake County, Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Carolina Power and Light Co.), 5.375%, 2/1/17 | | | 1,041,580 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,978,469 | | | |
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 5.4% |
|
$ | 440 | | | North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Escrowed to Maturity, 5.00%, 1/1/21 | | $ | 480,511 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Annie Penn Memorial Hospital), Prerefunded to 1/1/15, 5.375%, 1/1/22 | | | 1,696,920 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Escrowed to Various Dates, Series O, 0.00%, 7/1/17 | | | 1,483,420 | | | |
| 1,950 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Escrowed to Various Dates, Series N, 0.00%, 7/1/17 | | | 1,429,018 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,089,869 | | | |
|
|
|
General Obligations — 1.1% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Charlotte, 5.00%, 7/1/29 | | $ | 1,018,680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,018,680 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 12.6% |
|
$ | 20 | | | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, 5.00%, 1/15/47 | | $ | 18,584 | | | |
| 4,980 | | | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, 5.00%, 1/15/47(1) | | | 4,627,532 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Mission Health System), 5.00%, 10/1/25 | | | 1,937,440 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Mission Health System), 5.00%, 10/1/36 | | | 1,353,810 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Southeastern Regional Medical Center), 5.375%, 6/1/32 | | | 836,090 | | | |
| 500 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Union Regional Medical Center), 5.375%, 1/1/32 | | | 431,100 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (University Health System), 6.25%, 12/1/33 | | | 2,589,275 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,793,831 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 7.6% |
|
$ | 1,430 | | | Charlotte Housing Authority, (South Oaks Crossing Apartments), (AMT), 4.60%, 8/20/26 | | $ | 1,254,453 | | | |
| 2,420 | | | North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.80%, 1/1/37 | | | 2,032,001 | | | |
| 1,995 | | | North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.80%, 1/1/39 | | | 1,669,017 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.85%, 7/1/38 | | | 842,070 | | | |
| 995 | | | North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.90%, 7/1/37 | | | 847,850 | | | |
| 450 | | | North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, MFMR, (AMT), 6.45%, 9/1/27 | | | 450,203 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,095,594 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 2.2% |
|
$ | 1,320 | | | North Carolina Educational Facilities Finance Agency, (Johnson & Wales University), (XLCA), 5.00%, 4/1/33 | | $ | 1,033,771 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | University of North Carolina at Wilmington, (AGC), 5.00%, 10/1/33 | | | 995,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,029,521 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 3.3% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, (AGC), 6.00%, 1/1/19 | | $ | 1,062,610 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 885,100 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/35 | | | 1,102,575 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,050,285 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements55
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 1.9% |
|
$ | 840 | | | Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | | $ | 792,532 | | | |
| 920 | | | Smithville Township, Brunswick County, (MBIA), 5.00%, 6/1/24 | | | 941,270 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,733,802 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 11.6% |
|
$ | 1,675 | | | Johnston Memorial Hospital, (FSA), Variable Rate, 17.132%, 10/1/36(2)(3)(4) | | $ | 943,528 | | | |
| 1,100 | | | Nash Health Care System, (FSA), 5.00%, 11/1/30 | | | 962,643 | | | |
| 1,045 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Betsy Johnson), (FSA), 5.375%, 10/1/24 | | | 1,016,680 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Cleveland County Healthcare), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/35 | | | 1,513,920 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Wakemed), (AGC), 5.625%, 10/1/38 | | | 1,000,180 | | | |
| 2,090 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Wakemed), (AGC), 5.875%, 10/1/38 | | | 2,121,162 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Wilson Memorial Hospital), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 11/1/15 | | | 1,152,165 | | | |
| 1,210 | | | Onslow County, Hospital Authority, (Onslow Memorial Hospital), (MBIA), 5.00%, 4/1/25 | | | 1,048,937 | | | |
| 1,275 | | | Onslow County, Hospital Authority, (Onslow Memorial Hospital), (MBIA), 5.00%, 4/1/26 | | | 1,092,216 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,851,431 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Housing — 0.5% |
|
$ | 450 | | | University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Certificates of Participation, (Student Housing Project), (AGC), 5.00%, 6/1/32 | | $ | 442,071 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 442,071 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 7.6% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | City of Monroe Certificates of Participation, (AGC), 5.50%, 3/1/39 | | $ | 1,001,520 | | | |
| 1,130 | | | County of Harnett Certificates of Participation, (AGC), 4.50%, 6/1/25 | | | 1,086,529 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | County of Rockingham, (AGC), 5.00%, 4/1/32 | | | 2,476,225 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Franklin County, Certificates of Participation, (MBIA), 5.00%, 9/1/27 | | | 1,489,260 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | | | 1,092,030 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,145,564 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 4.2% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | High Point, (FSA), 5.00%, 11/1/33 | | $ | 1,991,420 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Monroe, Combined Enterprise System Revenue, (AGC), 5.00%, 3/1/33 | | | 1,977,940 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,969,360 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 2.9% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/27 | | $ | 908,570 | | | |
| 12,440 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | | | 493,868 | | | |
| 12,000 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/43 | | | 1,158,120 | | | |
| 450 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | | | 40,509 | | | |
| 895 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | | | 74,983 | | | |
| 720 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | | | 55,944 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,731,994 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 5.8% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Charlotte, Airport, (AMBAC), 4.50%, 7/1/37 | | $ | 1,666,860 | | | |
| 500 | | | Charlotte, Airport, (MBIA), (AMT), 5.25%, 7/1/21 | | | 480,640 | | | |
| 1,800 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | | | 1,742,787 | | | |
| 1,800 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/32 | | | 1,518,156 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,408,443 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 3.3% |
|
$ | 1,295 | | | Broad River, Water Authority Water System, (XLCA), 5.00%, 6/1/21 | | $ | 1,198,976 | | | |
| 500 | | | Brunswick County, Enterprise System Water and Sewer Revenue, (FSA), 5.25%, 4/1/26 | | | 509,765 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Kannapolis, Water and Sewer, (FSA), (AMT), 5.25%, 2/1/26 | | | 1,408,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,117,241 | | | |
|
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 9.1% |
|
$ | 1,550 | | | Cabarrus County, Certificates of Participation, 5.00%, 6/1/29 | | $ | 1,551,023 | | | |
| 1,400 | | | Cabarrus County, Certificates of Participation, 5.25%, 6/1/28 | | | 1,429,750 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Charlotte, (Government Facilities), 5.00%, 6/1/28 | | | 1,004,110 | | | |
See notes to financial statements56
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Charlotte, (Government Facilities), 5.00%, 6/1/33 | | | 1,483,260 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Raleigh, (Downtown Improvement Projects), 5.00%, 2/1/27 | | | 2,032,640 | | | |
| 1,050 | | | Wilmington, Certificates of Participation, 5.00%, 6/1/38 | | | 1,038,775 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,539,558 | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 0.2% |
|
$ | 13,560 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 | | $ | 181,162 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 181,162 | | | |
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.5% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (United Methodist), 5.25%, 10/1/24 | | $ | 734,780 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (United Methodist), 5.50%, 10/1/32 | | | 680,300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,415,080 | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 1.5% |
|
$ | 1,620 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | $ | 1,352,878 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,352,878 | | | |
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 5.4% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Cary, Comb Enterprise System, 5.00%, 12/1/33 | | $ | 2,021,060 | | | |
| 1,975 | | | Charlotte, Water and Sewer, 5.125%, 6/1/26 | | | 2,036,087 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Raleigh Enterprise System, 4.50%, 3/1/36 | | | 948,180 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,005,327 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 107.2% | | |
(identified cost $104,961,247) | | $ | 100,246,446 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (7.2)% | | $ | (6,750,676 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 93,495,770 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
MFMR - Multi Family Mortgage Revenue
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by North Carolina municipalities. In addition, 16.4% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2009 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 40.4% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.7% to 13.9% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
|
(2) | | Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at February 28, 2009. |
|
(3) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At February 28, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $943,528 or 1.0% of the Fund’s net assets. |
|
(4) | | Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $5,025,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the inverse floater. |
See notes to financial statements57
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 105.7% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Cogeneration — 0.7% |
|
$ | 960 | | | Western Generation Agency, (Wauna Cogeneration), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/12 | | $ | 883,229 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 883,229 | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 0.7% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Oregon State Facilities Authority, (Linfield College), 5.00%, 10/1/25 | | $ | 918,920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 918,920 | | | |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 2.9% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Northern Wasco County, (Bonneville Power Administration), 5.20%, 12/1/24 | | $ | 1,001,950 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Port of Morrow, Pollution Control, (Portland General Electric), Variable Rate, 5.20%, 5/1/33 | | | 1,002,410 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 1,268,010 | | | |
| 625 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.50%, 7/1/38 | | | 569,269 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,841,639 | | | |
|
|
|
General Obligations — 29.9% |
|
$ | 3,730 | | | Deschutes and Jefferson County, School District No. 2J, 0.00%, 6/15/26 | | $ | 1,573,986 | | | |
| 4,175 | | | Deschutes and Jefferson County, School District No. 2J, 0.00%, 6/15/27 | | | 1,652,298 | | | |
| 3,970 | | | Deschutes and Jefferson County, School District No. 2J, 0.00%, 6/15/31 | | | 1,225,777 | | | |
| 8,000 | | | Jackson County, School District No. 549C, 5.00%, 6/15/33(1) | | | 8,034,880 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Keizer, (Keizer Station Area A Improvement District), 5.20%, 6/1/31 | | | 2,344,725 | | | |
| 1,365 | | | Multnomah and Clackamas County, School District No. 51J, 0.00%, 6/15/34 | | | 334,029 | | | |
| 4,100 | | | Oregon, 4.50%, 8/1/37 | | | 3,755,723 | | | |
| 835 | | | Oregon, 4.70%, 12/1/41 | | | 659,850 | | | |
| 1,565 | | | Oregon Board of Higher Education, 0.00%, 8/1/20 | | | 962,099 | | | |
| 4,425 | | | Oregon Elderly and Disabled Housing, (AMT), 5.65%, 8/1/26 | | | 4,347,828 | | | |
| 660 | | | Oregon Veterans Welfare, Series 81, 5.25%, 10/1/42 | | | 599,339 | | | |
| 1,270 | | | Oregon Veterans Welfare, Series 82, 5.50%, 12/1/42 | | | 1,248,829 | | | |
| 2,990 | | | Portland, (Headwater Apartments), 5.00%, 4/1/25 | | | 3,031,860 | | | |
| 12,660 | | | Salem-Keizer, School District No. 24J, 0.00%, 6/15/30(2) | | | 3,735,713 | | | |
| 6,490 | | | Washington Clackamas County, School District No. 3, 5.00%, 6/15/33 | | | 6,551,980 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 40,058,916 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 3.2% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Deschutes County, Hospital Facilities Authority, (Cascade Healthcare Community), 8.25%, 1/1/38 | | $ | 2,188,080 | | | |
| 2,105 | | | Hood River County, Health Facility Authority Elderly Housing, (Down Manor), 6.50%, 1/1/17 | | | 2,108,115 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,296,195 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 17.5% |
|
$ | 850 | | | Oregon Health Authority, (Trillium Affordable Housing), (AMT), 6.75%, 2/15/29 | | $ | 677,841 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, (AMT), 4.85%, 7/1/37 | | | 2,535,990 | | | |
| 3,300 | | | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, (AMT), 5.40%, 7/1/27 | | | 3,169,848 | | | |
| 750 | | | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, MFMR, (AMT), 5.70%, 7/1/29 | | | 737,528 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, MFMR, (FHA), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/47 | | | 2,106,825 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, SFMR, (AMT), 4.75%, 7/1/36 | | | 1,670,600 | | | |
| 2,170 | | | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, SFMR, (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/25 | | | 2,040,776 | | | |
| 770 | | | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, SFMR, (AMT), 6.20%, 7/1/27 | | | 770,192 | | | |
| 410 | | | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, SFMR, (AMT), 6.40%, 7/1/26 | | | 410,213 | | | |
| 475 | | | Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, SFMR, (AMT), 6.45%, 7/1/26 | | | 475,266 | | | |
| 1,595 | | | Portland Housing Authority, (Pearl Court LP), (AMT), 4.50%, 1/1/22 | | | 1,457,607 | | | |
| 2,080 | | | Portland Housing Authority, (Pearl Court LP), (AMT), 4.625%, 1/1/27 | | | 1,769,165 | | | |
| 465 | | | Portland Housing Authority, (Yards Union Station Project), (AMT), 4.75%, 5/1/22 | | | 437,147 | | | |
| 2,740 | | | Portland Housing Authority, (Yards Union Station Project), (AMT), 4.85%, 5/1/29 | | | 2,388,403 | | | |
| 2,875 | | | Portland Housing Authority, MFMR, (Cherry Blossom), (AMT), 6.20%, 12/20/36 | | | 2,882,820 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 23,530,221 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements58
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 3.0% |
|
$ | 735 | | | Oregon Economic Development Authority, (Georgia-Pacific), (AMT), 5.70%, 12/1/25 | | $ | 406,227 | | | |
| 3,500 | | | Port of Astoria, PCR, (James River Corp.), 6.55%, 2/1/15 | | | 2,841,475 | | | |
| 830 | | | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 | | | 370,147 | | | |
| 915 | | | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 6.30%, 6/1/23 | | | 408,099 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,025,948 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 1.9% |
|
$ | 4,850 | | | Oregon Health Science University, (MBIA), 0.00%, 7/1/21 | | $ | 2,479,368 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,479,368 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 3.6% |
|
$ | 1,715 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/30 | | $ | 1,553,533 | | | |
| 2,760 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 2,442,876 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/35 | | | 882,060 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,878,469 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 11.2% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Clackamas County, School District No. 007J, (Lake Oswego), (FSA), 5.25%, 6/1/25 | | $ | 1,110,250 | | | |
| 1,050 | | | Clackamas County, School District No. 12, (North Clackamas), (FSA), 4.50%, 6/15/32 | | | 994,759 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Columbia, School District No. 502, (FGIC), (MBIA), 0.00%, 6/1/17 | | | 739,540 | | | |
| 2,950 | | | Deschutes and Jefferson County, School District No. 2J, (FGIC), (MBIA), 0.00%, 6/15/23 | | | 1,513,055 | | | |
| 3,750 | | | Lane County, School District No. 019, (Springfield), (FSA), 0.00%, 6/15/28 | | | 1,235,812 | | | |
| 575 | | | Lane County, School District No. 019, (Springfield), (FSA), 0.00%, 6/15/29 | | | 177,175 | | | |
| 800 | | | Lebanon, (AMBAC), 4.25%, 6/1/26 | | | 756,800 | | | |
| 600 | | | Linn County, Community School District No. 9, (Lebanon), (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.50%, 6/15/27 | | | 663,126 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Linn County, Community School District No. 9, (Lebanon), (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.50%, 6/15/30 | | | 4,320,360 | | | |
| 245 | | | Portland, Oregon Revenue, (MBIA), 4.50%, 6/1/28 | | | 237,611 | | | |
| 600 | | | Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | | | 566,094 | | | |
| 3,425 | | | Washington Clackamas and Yamhill Counties, School District No. 88J, (MBIA), 0.00%, 6/15/31 | | | 851,113 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Washington Multnomah and Yamhill Counties, School District No. 1J, (MBIA), 0.00%, 6/15/26 | | | 1,837,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,003,445 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 1.4% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Deschutes County, Hospital Facilities Authority, (Cascade Healthcare Community), (AMBAC), 5.375%, 1/1/35 | | $ | 1,940,100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,940,100 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Pooled Loans — 0.8% |
|
$ | 1,170 | | | Oregon Bond Bank, (AMBAC), 4.375%, 1/1/32 | | $ | 1,031,776 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,031,776 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 4.0% |
|
$ | 560 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/28 | | $ | 131,774 | | | |
| 450 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 50,949 | | | |
| 12,100 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/44 | | | 805,739 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/27 | | | 1,817,140 | | | |
| 20,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC), 0.00%, 7/1/42 | | | 1,552,400 | | | |
| 17,500 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | | | 694,750 | | | |
| 905 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | | | 81,468 | | | |
| 1,795 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | | | 150,385 | | | |
| 1,435 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | | | 111,499 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,396,104 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 4.0% |
|
$ | 315 | | | Jackson County, Airport, (XLCA), 5.25%, 12/1/32 | | $ | 273,102 | | | |
| 1,400 | | | Jackson County, Airport, (XLCA), 5.25%, 12/1/37 | | | 1,182,944 | | | |
| 2,265 | | | Jackson County, Airport, (XLCA), (AMT), 5.25%, 12/1/23 | | | 2,144,728 | | | |
| 1,800 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | | | 1,742,787 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,343,561 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements59
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 1.2% |
|
$ | 1,650 | | | Portland, Water System, (MBIA), 4.50%, 10/1/31 | | $ | 1,560,356 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,560,356 | | | |
|
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 1.6% |
|
$ | 2,200 | | | Oregon Department of Administration Services, 5.125%, 5/1/33 | | $ | 2,189,264 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,189,264 | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 0.2% |
|
$ | 20,255 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 | | $ | 270,607 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 270,607 | | | |
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.2% |
|
$ | 1,750 | | | Clackamas County, Hospital Facility Authority, (Homewoods), 5.15%, 10/20/37 | | $ | 1,621,253 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,621,253 | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 7.8% |
|
$ | 5,000 | | | Oregon Department of Transportation, (Highway User Tax), 4.50%, 11/15/32 | | $ | 4,742,500 | | | |
| 2,475 | | | Portland Limited Tax General Obligation, 0.00%, 6/1/22 | | | 1,363,255 | | | |
| 5,235 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57(3) | | | 4,371,801 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,477,556 | | | |
|
|
|
Transportation — 3.0% |
|
$ | 4,000 | | | Port of Portland Airport Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/29 | | $ | 3,994,680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,994,680 | | | |
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 5.9% |
|
$ | 2,805 | | | City of Eugene, 4.50%, 8/1/31 | | $ | 2,664,217 | | | |
| 2,385 | | | Portland, Sewer System, 4.75%, 6/15/29 | | | 2,375,603 | | | |
| 2,935 | | | Portland, Sewer System, 4.75%, 6/15/30 | | | 2,899,927 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,939,747 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 105.7% | | |
(identified cost $154,233,592) | | $ | 141,681,354 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (5.7)% | | $ | (7,577,009 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 134,104,345 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHA - Federal Housing Administration
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
MFMR - Multi Family Mortgage Revenue
PCR - Pollution Control Revenue
SFMR - Single Family Mortgage Revenue
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Oregon municipalities. In addition, 14.8% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2009 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 26.6% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.2% to 14.1% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
|
(2) | | When-issued security. |
|
(3) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities. |
See notes to financial statements60
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 103.3% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 4.2% |
|
$ | 865 | | | South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, (Furman University), 4.625%, 10/1/35 | | $ | 723,417 | | | |
| 1,175 | | | South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, (Furman University), 5.00%, 10/1/38 | | | 1,079,942 | | | |
| 750 | | | South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, (Wofford College), 4.50%, 4/1/30 | | | 599,910 | | | |
| 3,715 | | | South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, (Wofford College), 5.25%, 4/1/32 | | | 3,561,385 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,964,654 | | | |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 5.1% |
|
$ | 410 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/25 | | $ | 371,603 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 1,268,010 | | | |
| 5,440 | | | South Carolina Public Service Authority, 5.375%, 1/1/28 | | | 5,656,784 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,296,397 | | | |
|
|
|
General Obligations — 2.5% |
|
$ | 685 | | | Richland County, Sewer System, (Broad River), 5.125%, 3/1/29 | | $ | 697,029 | | | |
| 2,360 | | | South Carolina, 3.25%, 8/1/30 | | | 1,799,948 | | | |
| 1,240 | | | South Carolina, (Clemson University), 2.50%, 6/1/21 | | | 1,046,064 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,543,041 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 4.3% |
|
$ | 3,915 | | | Lexington County, (Health Services District, Inc.), 5.00%, 11/1/27 | | $ | 3,456,397 | | | |
| 3,380 | | | South Carolina Jobs Economic Development Authority, (Anmed Health), 6.00%, 9/15/38 | | | 2,721,846 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,178,243 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 0.2% |
|
$ | 220 | | | South Carolina Housing Finance Authority, SFMR, (FHA), 6.45%, 7/1/17 | | $ | 220,332 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 220,332 | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 1.5% |
|
$ | 400 | | | Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/26 | | $ | 178,384 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Richland County, Environmental Improvement, (International Paper Co.), (AMT), 5.95%, 9/1/31 | | | 919,695 | | | |
| 1,400 | | | Richland County, Environmental Improvement, (International Paper Co.), (AMT), 6.10%, 4/1/23 | | | 1,022,546 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,120,625 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 1.5% |
|
$ | 475 | | | College of Charleston, Academic and Administrative Facilities, (XLCA), 5.375%, 4/1/25 | | $ | 479,076 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | College of Charleston, Higher Education Facility, (XLCA), 4.50%, 4/1/37 | | | 1,668,100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,147,176 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 10.4% |
|
$ | 7,500 | | | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (AGC) (AMBAC), 0.00%, 1/1/29 | | $ | 2,482,425 | | | |
| 14,260 | | | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (AGC) (AMBAC), 0.00%, 1/1/32 | | | 3,909,094 | | | |
| 7,500 | | | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 1/1/29 | | | 2,132,025 | | | |
| 2,940 | | | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 1/1/32 | | | 684,020 | | | |
| 2,090 | | | Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, (FGIC), 0.00%, 1/1/23 | | | 924,407 | | | |
| 1,420 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/30 | | | 1,286,307 | | | |
| 3,825 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 3,385,508 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,803,786 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 3.4% |
|
$ | 1,300 | | | Berkeley County, (FSA), 2.00%, 9/1/25 | | $ | 895,609 | | | |
| 3,330 | | | Berkeley County, School District, (FSA), 2.75%, 1/15/22 | | | 2,849,648 | | | |
| 630 | | | Puerto Rico, (AGC), 5.50%, 7/1/29 | | | 636,117 | | | |
| 500 | | | Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | | | 471,745 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,853,119 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 4.3% |
|
$ | 3,755 | | | Medical University Hospital Authority, (MBIA), 5.00%, 8/15/31 | | $ | 3,286,526 | | | |
| 3,290 | | | South Carolina Jobs Economic Development Authority, (Palmetto Health Facility), (FSA), 5.00%, 8/1/35 | | | 2,872,170 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,158,696 | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements61
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 12.6% |
|
$ | 250 | | | Berkeley County, School District, (CIFG), 4.75%, 12/1/31 | | $ | 230,683 | | | |
| 500 | | | Greenville County, School District, (Building Equity Sooner), (AGC), 5.00%, 12/1/28 | | | 493,170 | | | |
| 3,975 | | | Greenwood Fifty School Facilities, Inc., Installment Purchase Revenue, (AGC), 4.50%, 12/1/32 | | | 3,574,121 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Kershaw County, Public Schools Foundation, (CIFG), 5.00%, 12/1/28 | | | 1,417,650 | | | |
| 2,785 | | | Kershaw County, Public Schools Foundation, (CIFG), 5.00%, 12/1/31 | | | 2,660,873 | | | |
| 1,450 | | | Scago Educational Facilities Corp., Cherokee School District No. 1, (FSA), 5.00%, 12/1/30 | | | 1,432,832 | | | |
| 6,260 | | | Scago Educational Facilities Corp., Pickens School District, (FSA), 4.50%, 12/1/28 | | | 5,698,603 | | | |
| 2,635 | | | Sumter Two School Facility, Inc., Installment Purchase Revenue, (AGC), 4.50%, 12/1/32 | | | 2,369,260 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,877,192 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 1.1% |
|
$ | 1,900 | | | Columbia, Parking Facility, (CIFG), 5.00%, 2/1/37 | | $ | 1,516,447 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,516,447 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 0.4% |
|
$ | 4,890 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | | $ | 194,133 | | | |
| 905 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | | | 81,468 | | | |
| 1,795 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | | | 150,385 | | | |
| 1,435 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (MBIA), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | | | 111,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 537,486 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 7.4% |
|
$ | 2,700 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | | $ | 2,614,180 | | | |
| 1,095 | | | Richland-Lexington Airport District (Columbia Metropolitan Airport), (CIFG), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/21 | | | 1,011,769 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure Bank Revenue, (AMBAC), 4.50%, 10/1/31 | | | 898,950 | | | |
| 6,740 | | | South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure Bank Revenue, (AMBAC), (XLCA), 4.50%, 10/1/32 | | | 6,035,131 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,560,030 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Utilities — 6.5% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Greer, Combined Utility System, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 9/1/27 | | $ | 1,085,220 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Greer, Combined Utility System, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 9/1/32 | | | 2,106,020 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Orangeburg County, Solid Waste, (South Carolina Electric and Gas Co.), (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.70%, 11/1/24 | | | 4,751,100 | | | |
| 1,300 | | | South Carolina Jobs Economic Development Authority, (South Carolina Electric and Gas Co.), (AMBAC), 5.20%, 11/1/27 | | | 1,304,641 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,246,981 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 11.8% |
|
$ | 2,900 | | | Beaufort-Jasper, Water and Sewer Authority, (FSA), 4.50%, 3/1/31 | | $ | 2,667,826 | | | |
| 1,130 | | | Cayce, Waterworks and Sewer Revenue, (XLCA), 4.625%, 7/1/27 | | | 1,065,183 | | | |
| 500 | | | Dorchester County, Water and Sewer System, (MBIA), 5.00%, 10/1/28 | | | 490,185 | | | |
| 1,875 | | | Greenwood, Metropolitan District Subway System, (FSA), Variable Rate, 15.818%, 10/1/30(2)(3) | | | 1,874,625 | | | |
| 3,830 | | | Lugoff-Elgin, Water Authority, (MBIA), 4.625%, 7/1/37 | | | 3,421,837 | | | |
| 1,895 | | | Richland County, Sewer System, (Broad River), (XLCA), 4.50%, 3/1/34 | | | 1,721,873 | | | |
| 6,250 | | | Sumter, Waterworks and Sewer System, (XLCA), 4.50%, 12/1/32 | | | 5,524,437 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 16,765,966 | | | |
|
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 15.5% |
|
$ | 4,000 | | | Berkeley County, School District, 5.125%, 12/1/30 | | $ | 3,914,960 | | | |
| 370 | | | Charleston Educational Excellence Financing Corp., 5.25%, 12/1/22 | | | 378,932 | | | |
| 2,360 | | | Charleston Educational Excellence Financing Corp., 5.25%, 12/1/28 | | | 2,325,567 | | | |
| 1,450 | | | Dorchester County, School District No. 2, 5.00%, 12/1/30 | | | 1,362,028 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Greenville County, School District, 5.00%, 12/1/24(1) | | | 3,042,570 | | | |
| 3,895 | | | Laurens County, School District, 5.25%, 12/1/30 | | | 3,238,926 | | | |
| 3,320 | | | Lexington, One School Facility Corp., 5.00%, 12/1/27 | | | 3,086,571 | | | |
| 1,470 | | | Lexington, One School Facility Corp., 5.25%, 12/1/27 | | | 1,432,236 | | | |
See notes to financial statements62
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2,420 | | | Newberry, (Newberry County School District), 5.00%, 12/1/30 | | | 1,943,817 | | | |
| 1,520 | | | Newberry, (Newberry County School District), 5.25%, 12/1/25 | | | 1,358,257 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 22,083,864 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 8.5% |
|
$ | 21,465 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 | | $ | 286,772 | | | |
| 8,100 | | | Tobacco Settlement Management Authority, Escrowed to Maturity, 6.375%, 5/15/30 | | | 9,469,224 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Tobacco Settlement Revenue Management Authority, Prerefunded to 5/15/11, 5.00%, 6/1/18 | | | 2,382,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,138,121 | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 2.1% |
|
$ | 10,000 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 0.00%, 8/1/56 | | $ | 328,700 | | | |
| 3,235 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | | 2,701,581 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,030,281 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 103.3% | | |
(identified cost $158,501,036) | | $ | 147,042,437 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (3.3)% | | $ | (4,708,099 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 142,334,338 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHA - Federal Housing Administration
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
SFMR - Single Family Mortgage Revenue
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by South Carolina municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 57.4% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 3.8% to 17.4% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
|
(2) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At February 28, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $1,874,625 or 1.3% of the Fund’s net assets. |
|
(3) | | Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at February 28, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements63
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 97.7% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 2.9% |
|
$ | 1,500 | | | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, (Vanderbilt University), 5.00%, 10/1/28 | | $ | 1,502,895 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,502,895 | | | |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 5.4% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Chattanooga, Electric Revenue, 5.00%, 9/1/33 | | $ | 988,850 | | | |
| 500 | | | Knoxville, Electric Revenue, 4.50%, 7/1/28 | | | 483,655 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, 5.125%, 5/15/26 | | | 1,009,530 | | | |
| 300 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/25 | | | 271,905 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,753,940 | | | |
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.7% |
|
$ | 470 | | | Sullivan County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (Wellmont Health System), Prerefunded to 9/1/12, 6.25%, 9/1/22 | | $ | 536,697 | | | |
| 280 | | | Sullivan County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (Wellmont Health System), Prerefunded to 9/1/12, 6.25%, 9/1/22 | | | 319,735 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 856,432 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 7.5% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Chattanooga, Health, Educational and Housing Facility Board, (Catholic Health Initiatives), 6.25%, 10/1/33 | | $ | 518,955 | | | |
| 500 | | | City of Jackson, (Jackson-Madison County General Hospital), 5.75%, 4/1/41 | | | 484,680 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Johnson City, Health and Educational Facilities Board, 5.50%, 7/1/36 | | | 710,910 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Knox County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (Covenant Health), 0.00%, 1/1/39 | | | 435,950 | | | |
| 3,200 | | | Knox County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (Covenant Health), 0.00%, 1/1/42 | | | 215,104 | | | |
| 500 | | | Knox County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (East Tennessee Hospital), 5.75%, 7/1/33 | | | 373,130 | | | |
| 500 | | | Shelby County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/31 | | | 490,730 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Sullivan County, Health, Educational and Facility Board, (Wellmont Health System), 5.25%, 9/1/36 | | | 605,140 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,834,599 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 4.8% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, (AMT), 4.85%, 1/1/32 | | $ | 440,250 | | | |
| 500 | | | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, (AMT), 4.85%, 7/1/38 | | | 421,035 | | | |
| 1,375 | | | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/32 | | | 1,211,210 | | | |
| 365 | | | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, (AMT), 5.375%, 7/1/23 | | | 359,631 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,432,126 | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 1.1% |
|
$ | 410 | | | Hardeman County, (Correctional Facilities Corp.), 7.75%, 8/1/17 | | $ | 371,612 | | | |
| 550 | | | McMinn County, (Calhoun Newsprint — Bowater, Inc.), (AMT), 7.40%, 12/1/22 | | | 99,005 | | | |
| 150 | | | Virgin Islands Public Financing Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 91,124 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 561,741 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 4.4% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, (Meharry Medical College), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/24 | | $ | 826,610 | | | |
| 1,230 | | | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, (Meharry Medical College), (AMBAC), 6.00%, 12/1/19 | | | 1,419,432 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,246,042 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 15.5% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Lawrenceburg, Electric, (MBIA), 6.625%, 7/1/18 | | $ | 1,216,000 | | | |
| 500 | | | Lawrenceburg, Public Building Authority, (Electric System-Public Works), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/26 | | | 502,275 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Lawrenceburg, Public Building Authority, (Electric System-Public Works), (FSA), Prerefunded to 7/1/11, 5.00%, 7/1/26 | | | 1,084,780 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 5/15/29 | | | 1,003,570 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, (MBIA), 0.00%, 5/15/17 | | | 1,495,400 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Pleasant View, Utility District, (MBIA), 5.00%, 9/1/32 | | | 925,780 | | | |
| 260 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/30 | | | 235,521 | | | |
See notes to financial statements64
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 300 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 265,530 | | | |
| 500 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/35 | | | 441,030 | | | |
| 750 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/16 | | | 747,255 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,917,141 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 14.7% |
|
$ | 345 | | | Bristol, (Bristol Memorial Hospital), (FGIC), Escrowed to Maturity, 6.75%, 9/1/10 | | $ | 363,647 | | | |
| 250 | | | Chattanooga, (Memorial Hospital), (MBIA), Escrowed to Maturity, 6.625%, 9/1/09 | | | 257,825 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Johnson City, Health and Educational Facilities Board, (Johnson City Medical Center), (MBIA), Prerefunded to 7/1/23, 5.125%, 7/1/25 | | | 1,516,425 | | | |
| 825 | | | Knox County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (Covenant Health), (FSA), Prerefunded to 1/1/13, 5.00%, 1/1/26 | | | 923,761 | | | |
| 500 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA), Prerefunded to 7/1/12, 5.125%, 7/1/26 | | | 563,565 | | | |
| 250 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 7/1/13, 5.00%, 7/1/32 | | | 283,897 | | | |
| 1,230 | | | Shelby County, (Lebonheur Children’s Hospital), (MBIA), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/15/12 | | | 1,318,105 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | West Wilson Utility District Waterworks, (MBIA), Prerefunded to 6/1/14, 5.00%, 6/1/34 | | | 2,290,300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,517,525 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 8.1% |
|
$ | 750 | | | Blount County, Public Building Authority, (AGC), 4.50%, 6/1/30 | | $ | 692,325 | | | |
| 500 | | | Blount County, Public Building Authority, (AGC), 5.00%, 6/1/32 | | | 495,210 | | | |
| 1,425 | | | Franklin, Special School District, (FSA), 0.00%, 6/1/19 | | | 943,792 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Franklin, Special School District, (FSA), 0.00%, 6/1/20 | | | 1,548,875 | | | |
| 500 | | | Rutherford County, (MBIA), 4.50%, 4/1/30 | | | 475,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,155,327 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 1.2% |
|
$ | 675 | | | Knox County, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (Covenant Health), (FSA), 5.00%, 1/1/26 | | $ | 620,791 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 620,791 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 1.0% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | | $ | 546,015 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 546,015 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 1.9% |
|
$ | 3,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/34 | | $ | 424,830 | | | |
| 4,450 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/44 | | | 296,325 | | | |
| 1,750 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC), 0.00%, 7/1/33 | | | 268,328 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 989,483 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 5.6% |
|
$ | 1,500 | | | Memphis-Shelby County, Airport Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT), 6.00%, 3/1/24 | | $ | 1,470,945 | | | |
| 560 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | | | 542,200 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/32 | | | 843,420 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,856,565 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 16.8% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Clarksville, Water, Sewer and Gas, (FSA), 5.25%, 2/1/18(2) | | $ | 1,125,810 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Harpeth Valley Utilities District, Davidson and Williamson Counties, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.00%, 9/1/35 | | | 972,800 | | | |
| 750 | | | Hawkins County, First Utility District, (AGC), 5.00%, 6/1/42 | | | 655,298 | | | |
| 875 | | | Knox County, First Utility District, (MBIA), 5.00%, 12/1/25 | | | 882,779 | | | |
| 500 | | | Knoxville, Waste Water System, (FSA), 4.50%, 4/1/37 | | | 454,755 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Knoxville, Waste Water System, (MBIA), 4.00%, 4/1/40 | | | 804,970 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Memphis, Sanitary Sewer System, (FSA), 4.75%, 7/1/24 | | | 1,011,960 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Water System, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.20%, 1/1/13 | | | 1,089,600 | | | |
See notes to financial statements65
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 500 | | | South Blount County, Utility District, Water Revenue, (FSA), 5.00%, 12/1/33 | | | 477,420 | | | |
| 660 | | | West Wilson Utility District Waterworks, (MBIA), 4.00%, 6/1/32 | | | 524,000 | | | |
| 750 | | | West Wilson Utility District Waterworks, (MBIA), 4.25%, 6/1/36 | | | 610,695 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,610,087 | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 2.8% |
|
$ | 6,550 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 | | $ | 87,508 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Revenue, 5.25%, 9/1/26 | | | 1,354,940 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,442,448 | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 2.3% |
|
$ | 1,410 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | $ | 1,177,505 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,177,505 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 97.7% | | |
(identified cost $53,960,746) | | $ | 50,020,662 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 2.3% | | $ | 1,197,787 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 51,218,449 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Tennessee municipalities. In addition, 13.7% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2009 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 70.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.1% to 34.4% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
|
(2) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
See notes to financial statements66
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.5% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 7.3% |
|
$ | 800 | | | Alexandria Industrial Development Authority, 4.50%, 1/1/35 | | $ | 651,080 | | | |
| 4,100 | | | University of Virginia University Revenues, 5.00%, 6/1/40 | | | 4,160,434 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Virginia College Building Authority, 5.00%, 9/1/33 | | | 4,033,120 | | | |
| 275 | | | Virginia College Building Authority, 5.00%, 9/1/38 | | | 275,619 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,120,253 | | | |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 0.8% |
|
$ | 1,500 | | | Chesterfield County Economic Development Authority, (Virginia Electric Power Co. Project), (AMT), 5.60%, 11/1/31 | | $ | 1,026,885 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,026,885 | | | |
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 0.1% |
|
$ | 75 | | | Henrico County Economic Development, (Bon Secours Health System, Inc.), Prerefunded to 11/15/12, 5.60%, 11/15/30 | | $ | 85,562 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 85,562 | | | |
|
|
|
General Obligations — 5.2% |
|
$ | 1,390 | | | Peninsula Airport Commission, (City Guaranteed), (AMT), 5.50%, 7/15/21 | | $ | 1,379,811 | | | |
| 1,475 | | | Virginia, 5.00%, 6/1/28 | | | 1,534,796 | | | |
| 1,980 | | | Virginia Public School Authority, 4.50%, 8/1/32 | | | 1,867,675 | | | |
| 1,550 | | | Virginia Public School Authority, 5.00%, 8/1/21 | | | 1,610,915 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,393,197 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 14.0% |
|
$ | 2,250 | | | Albemarle County Industrial Development Authority, (Martha Jefferson Hospital), 5.25%, 10/1/35 | | $ | 1,882,508 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Fairfax County Industrial Development Authority, (Inova Health System Hospitals), 5.00%, 8/15/14 | | | 1,606,815 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Fairfax County Industrial Development Authority, (Inova Health System Hospitals), 5.00%, 8/15/15 | | | 2,152,220 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Fairfax County Industrial Development Authority, (Inova Health System Hospitals), 5.00%, 8/15/23(1) | | | 5,162,274 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Fauquier County Industrial Development Authority, (Fauquier Hospital), 5.25%, 10/1/37 | | | 751,910 | | | |
| 1,795 | | | Henrico County Economic Development, (Bon Secours Health System, Inc.), 5.60%, 11/15/30 | | | 1,654,182 | | | |
| 500 | | | Prince William County Industrial Development Authority, 5.20%, 10/1/30 | | | 374,075 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Prince William County Industrial Development Authority, (Potomac Hospital Corp.), 5.35%, 10/1/36 | | | 735,800 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, (Wellmort Health), 5.25%, 9/1/37 | | | 1,233,680 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Winchester Industrial Development Authority, (Valley Health System), 5.25%, 1/1/37 | | | 1,886,920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,440,384 | | | |
|
|
|
Housing — 8.1% |
|
$ | 5,000 | | | Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority, (Cedar Ridge), (AMT), 4.85%, 10/1/48(2) | | $ | 4,127,200 | | | |
| 1,820 | | | Multifamily Housing Bond Pass Through Certificates of Beneficial Owners, (Prince William County), (AMT), 6.00%, 11/1/33 | | | 1,507,834 | | | |
| 2,750 | | | Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), 4.90%, 1/1/33 | | | 2,448,490 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), 5.10%, 10/1/35 | | | 1,366,005 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), Variable Rate, 21.934%, 10/1/35(3)(4)(5) | | | 649,630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,099,159 | | | |
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 3.3% |
|
$ | 1,250 | | | James City County Industrial Development Authority, (Anheuser Busch Cos., Inc.), (AMT), 6.00%, 4/1/32 | | $ | 1,081,612 | | | |
| 2,250 | | | Norfolk, Airport Authority, (AMT), 6.25%, 1/1/30 | | | 1,640,475 | | | |
| 2,230 | | | Virgin Islands Public Financing Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 1,354,703 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,076,790 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 5.7% |
|
$ | 6,655 | | | Virginia College Building Authority, (Washington and Lee University), (MBIA), 5.25%, 1/1/31(2) | | $ | 7,051,505 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,051,505 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 4.0% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Halifax County Industrial Development Authority, (Old Dominion Electric Cooperation), (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.625%, 6/1/28 | | $ | 1,829,560 | | | |
| 2,100 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/16 | | | 2,092,314 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (XLCA), 5.375%, 7/1/18 | | | 989,090 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,910,964 | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements67
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 2.2% |
|
$ | 710 | | | Fairfax, (MBIA), 4.50%, 1/15/36 | | $ | 676,957 | | | |
| 1,040 | | | Harrisonburg, (FSA), 4.25%, 2/1/33 | | | 930,488 | | | |
| 1,200 | | | Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/20 | | | 1,132,188 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,739,633 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 4.6% |
|
$ | 200 | | | Harrisonburg Industrial Development Authority, (Rockingham Memorial Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 8/15/46 | | $ | 145,532 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Henrico County, (Bon Secours Health System, Inc.), (MBIA), 6.25%, 8/15/20 | | | 1,739,685 | | | |
| 3,655 | | | Virginia Beach, (Virginia Beach Memorial Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.125%, 2/15/18(2) | | | 3,795,973 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,681,190 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 2.5% |
|
$ | 900 | | | Powhatan County Economic Development Authority, Lease Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.25%, 7/15/33 | | $ | 835,767 | | | |
| 2,450 | | | Rappahannock, Regional Jail Authority, (MBIA), 4.50%, 12/1/36 | | | 2,263,580 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,099,347 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Pooled Loans — 1.2% |
|
$ | 250 | | | Stafford County & Staunton Industrial Development Authority, (CIFG), 4.75%, 8/1/29 | | $ | 197,095 | | | |
| 1,640 | | | Stafford County & Staunton Industrial Development Authority, (CIFG), 5.00%, 8/1/36 | | | 1,258,585 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,455,680 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 0.2% |
|
$ | 1,020 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/28 | | $ | 240,016 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 240,016 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 17.0% |
|
$ | 5,000 | | | Chesapeake Bay Bridge and Tunnel Commission, (General Resolution), (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/25 | | $ | 5,197,050 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airport Authority System, (FGIC), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.00%, 10/1/33 | | | 845,070 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airport Authority System, (FGIC), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.25%, 10/1/32 | | | 881,870 | | | |
| 5,255 | | | Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airport Authority System, (MBIA), (AMT), 5.50%, 10/1/27 | | | 4,951,419 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Norfolk, Airport Authority, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.125%, 7/1/31 | | | 932,560 | | | |
| 3,040 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | | | 2,943,373 | | | |
| 1,600 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/29 | | | 1,420,688 | | | |
| 3,800 | | | Richmond, Metropolitan Authority Expressway, (FGIC), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/15/22 | | | 3,982,172 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 21,154,202 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 4.1% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Henry County, Water and Sewer Authority, (FSA), 5.50%, 11/15/19 | | $ | 1,162,420 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Spotsylvania County, Water and Sewer, (FSA), 4.50%, 6/1/32 | | | 2,763,150 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Upper Occoquan, Sewer Authority, (MBIA), 5.15%, 7/1/20 | | | 1,138,270 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,063,840 | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 4.6% |
|
$ | 7,000 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 | | $ | 93,520 | | | |
| 14,980 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/55 | | | 99,467 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Prince William County Industrial Development Authority, (Catholic Diocese Arlington), 5.50%, 10/1/33 | | | 1,143,900 | | | |
| 30,000 | | | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 0.00%, 6/1/47 | | | 546,000 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 5.00%, 6/1/47 | | | 1,053,100 | | | |
| 2,710 | | | Virginia Resources Authority Infrastructure Revenue, 5.25%, 11/1/33 | | | 2,759,187 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,695,174 | | | |
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.8% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Fairfax County Economic Development Authority, (Goodwin House, Inc.), 5.125%, 10/1/37 | | $ | 658,280 | | | |
| 1,380 | | | Fairfax County Economic Development Authority, (Goodwin House, Inc.), 5.125%, 10/1/42 | | | 887,961 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 1,000 | | | Virginia Beach, Development Authority, (Westminster-Canterbury), 5.375%, 11/1/32 | | $ | 734,840 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,281,081 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 3.8% |
|
$ | 5,685 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | $ | 4,747,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,747,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements68
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund as of February 28, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Transportation — 0.7% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airport Authority System, (AMT), 5.375%, 10/1/29 | | $ | 916,660 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 916,660 | | | |
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 8.0% |
|
$ | 2,795 | | | Fairfax County, Water Authority, 5.25%, 4/1/27(6) | | $ | 3,111,450 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | James City Service Authority, Water and Sewer, 4.75%, 1/15/39 | | | 2,866,230 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Upper Occoquan Sewer Authority, 4.50%, 7/1/38 | | | 2,287,025 | | | |
| 1,755 | | | Upper Occoquan Sewer Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/41 | | | 1,729,956 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,994,661 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.2% | | |
(identified cost $135,172,809) | | $ | 123,273,783 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 0.3% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 330 | | | Fairfax County Industrial Development Authority, Variable Rate, 0.72%, 8/15/23(7) | | $ | 330,000 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments — 0.3% | | |
(identified cost $330,000) | | $ | 330,000 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 99.5% | | |
(identified cost $135,502,809) | | $ | 123,603,783 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.5% | | $ | 601,217 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 124,205,000 | | | |
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
MBIA - MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Virginia municipalities. In addition, 11.1% of the Fund’s net assets at February 28, 2009 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at February 28, 2009, 41.6% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.8% to 26.6% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender option bond trust (see Note 1I). |
|
(2) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for open swap contracts or inverse floating-rate security transactions. |
|
(3) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At February 28, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $649,630 or 0.5% of the Fund’s net assets. |
|
(4) | | Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at February 28, 2009. |
|
(5) | | Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $4,000,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the inverse floater. |
|
(6) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(7) | | Variable rate demand obligation. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at February 28, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements69
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of February 28, 2009 | | Alabama Fund | | | Arkansas Fund | | | Georgia Fund | | | Kentucky Fund | | | |
|
|
Assets |
|
Investments — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Identified cost | | $ | 53,688,941 | | | $ | 61,428,757 | | | $ | 87,366,895 | | | $ | 53,240,007 | | | |
Unrealized depreciation | | | (2,845,257 | ) | | | (5,494,213 | ) | | | (5,498,288 | ) | | | (2,783,764 | ) | | |
|
|
Investments, at value | | $ | 50,843,684 | | | $ | 55,934,544 | | | $ | 81,868,607 | | | $ | 50,456,243 | | | |
|
|
Cash | | $ | 919,096 | | | $ | 1,996,164 | | | $ | 2,903,257 | | | $ | 140,447 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 650,995 | | | | 736,926 | | | | 951,282 | | | | 523,533 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | — | | | | — | | | | 49,330 | | | | — | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 19,891 | | | | 70,505 | | | | 148,250 | | | | 126,954 | | | |
Receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 67,891 | | | | 158,000 | | | | 228,359 | | | | 68,875 | | | |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | 444,068 | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 52,501,557 | | | $ | 58,896,139 | | | $ | 86,593,153 | | | $ | 51,316,052 | | | |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued | | $ | 1,305,000 | | | $ | 865,000 | | | $ | 7,920,000 | | | $ | — | | | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | 201,246 | | | | 370,226 | | | | 357,880 | | | | 257,147 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 33,510 | | | | 20,262 | | | | 356,412 | | | | 119,921 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 87,137 | | | | 76,057 | | | | 144,184 | | | | 53,772 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 11,733 | | | | 14,070 | | | | 23,848 | | | | 11,656 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 12,158 | | | | 12,517 | | | | 18,830 | | | | 11,917 | | | |
Interest expense and fees payable | | | 6,411 | | | | 3,870 | | | | 26,265 | | | | — | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 28,498 | | | | 32,706 | | | | 38,078 | | | | 34,218 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,685,693 | | | $ | 1,394,708 | | | $ | 8,885,497 | | | $ | 488,631 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 50,815,864 | | | $ | 57,501,431 | | | $ | 77,707,656 | | | $ | 50,827,421 | | | |
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 55,170,697 | | | $ | 67,501,156 | | | $ | 90,311,532 | | | $ | 58,053,868 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (1,497,992 | ) | | | (4,396,842 | ) | | | (7,655,670 | ) | | | (4,350,710 | ) | | |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (45,614 | ) | | | (161,996 | ) | | | (148,271 | ) | | | (60,919 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | | (2,811,227 | ) | | | (5,440,887 | ) | | | (4,799,935 | ) | | | (2,814,818 | ) | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 50,815,864 | | | $ | 57,501,431 | | | $ | 77,707,656 | | | $ | 50,827,421 | | | |
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 39,373,091 | | | $ | 50,960,140 | | | $ | 58,329,779 | | | $ | 43,824,878 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 4,486,007 | | | | 6,131,638 | | | | 7,308,242 | | | | 5,452,580 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.78 | | | $ | 8.31 | | | $ | 7.98 | | | $ | 8.04 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 9.22 | | | $ | 8.72 | | | $ | 8.38 | | | $ | 8.44 | | | |
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 6,932,985 | | | $ | 3,567,467 | | | $ | 6,505,493 | | | $ | 4,905,012 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 717,928 | | | | 399,414 | | | | 762,569 | | | | 565,120 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.66 | | | $ | 8.93 | | | $ | 8.53 | | | $ | 8.68 | | | |
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 1,326,647 | | | $ | 2,973,824 | | | $ | 7,049,612 | | | $ | 2,097,531 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 137,348 | | | | 333,003 | | | | 825,709 | | | | 241,612 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.66 | | | $ | 8.93 | | | $ | 8.54 | | | $ | 8.68 | | | |
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 3,183,141 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,822,772 | | | $ | — | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 362,490 | | | | — | | | | 727,640 | | | | — | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.78 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8.00 | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
On sales of $25,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
See notes to financial statements70
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of February 28, 2009 | | Louisiana Fund | | | Maryland Fund | | | Missouri Fund | | | North Carolina Fund | | | |
|
|
Assets |
|
Investments — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Identified cost | | $ | 42,472,317 | | | $ | 98,031,694 | | | $ | 101,119,899 | | | $ | 104,961,247 | | | |
Unrealized depreciation | | | (4,620,503 | ) | | | (10,569,694 | ) | | | (5,690,424 | ) | | | (4,714,801 | ) | | |
|
|
Investments, at value | | $ | 37,851,814 | | | $ | 87,462,000 | | | $ | 95,429,475 | | | $ | 100,246,446 | | | |
|
|
Cash | | $ | 98,915 | | | $ | 3,379,960 | | | $ | 2,400,316 | | | $ | 648,241 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 499,775 | | | | 1,168,123 | | | | 1,226,535 | | | | 1,291,497 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 269,691 | | | | — | | | | 448,986 | | | | 24,691 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 42,307 | | | | 199,930 | | | | 131,280 | | | | 78,550 | | | |
Receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 12,859 | | | | 130,844 | | | | 114,797 | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 38,775,361 | | | $ | 92,340,857 | | | $ | 99,751,389 | | | $ | 102,289,425 | | | |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued | | $ | 310,000 | | | $ | 3,375,000 | | | $ | 1,030,000 | | | $ | 7,970,000 | | | |
Demand note payable | | | 500,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Payable for when-issued securities | | | — | | | | — | | | | 500,335 | | | | — | | | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | 185,876 | | | | 407,817 | | | | 857,512 | | | | 324,589 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 33,402 | | | | 161,065 | | | | 32,847 | | | | 253,770 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 71,997 | | | | 116,923 | | | | 118,336 | | | | 150,507 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 7,213 | | | | 31,978 | | | | 31,515 | | | | 28,981 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 8,036 | | | | 23,874 | | | | 21,628 | | | | 21,084 | | | |
Interest expense and fees payable | | | 1,777 | | | | 7,301 | | | | 5,903 | | | | 9,640 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 23,460 | | | | 41,879 | | | | 42,004 | | | | 35,084 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,141,761 | | | $ | 4,165,837 | | | $ | 2,640,080 | | | $ | 8,793,655 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 37,633,600 | | | $ | 88,175,020 | | | $ | 97,111,309 | | | $ | 93,495,770 | | | |
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 44,792,933 | | | $ | 105,940,329 | | | $ | 109,918,808 | | | $ | 102,823,897 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (2,327,682 | ) | | | (7,235,625 | ) | | | (6,356,349 | ) | | | (4,242,413 | ) | | |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (81,461 | ) | | | (5,615 | ) | | | (167,357 | ) | | | (46,324 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | | (4,750,190 | ) | | | (10,524,069 | ) | | | (6,283,793 | ) | | | (5,039,390 | ) | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 37,633,600 | | | $ | 88,175,020 | | | $ | 97,111,309 | | | $ | 93,495,770 | | | |
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 33,804,345 | | | $ | 69,604,336 | | | $ | 85,295,236 | | | $ | 71,486,286 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 4,093,107 | | | | 8,691,043 | | | | 9,889,279 | | | | 8,744,538 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.26 | | | $ | 8.01 | | | $ | 8.63 | | | $ | 8.17 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 8.67 | | | $ | 8.41 | | | $ | 9.06 | | | $ | 8.58 | | | |
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 2,985,580 | | | $ | 8,184,731 | | | $ | 6,669,021 | | | $ | 5,479,421 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 342,016 | | | | 936,716 | | | | 699,459 | | | | 622,881 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.73 | | | $ | 8.74 | | | $ | 9.53 | | | $ | 8.80 | | | |
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 843,675 | | | $ | 10,133,289 | | | $ | 5,147,052 | | | $ | 8,210,434 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 96,503 | | | | 1,159,521 | | | | 540,337 | | | | 933,265 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.74 | | | $ | 8.74 | | | $ | 9.53 | | | $ | 8.80 | | | |
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | — | | | $ | 252,664 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,319,629 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | — | | | | 31,527 | | | | — | | | | 1,014,996 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | — | | | $ | 8.01 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8.20 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $25,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
See notes to financial statements71
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of February 28, 2009 | | Oregon Fund | | | South Carolina Fund | | | Tennessee Fund | | | Virginia Fund | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investments — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Identified cost | | $ | 154,233,592 | | | $ | 158,501,036 | | | $ | 53,960,746 | | | $ | 135,502,809 | | | |
Unrealized depreciation | | | (12,552,238 | ) | | | (11,458,599 | ) | | | (3,940,084 | ) | | | (11,899,026 | ) | | |
|
|
Investments, at value | | $ | 141,681,354 | | | $ | 147,042,437 | | | $ | 50,020,662 | | | $ | 123,603,783 | | | |
|
|
Cash | | $ | 2,541,628 | | | $ | 2,208,347 | | | $ | 1,131,142 | | | $ | 4,916,922 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 1,237,173 | | | | 2,083,336 | | | | 640,830 | | | | 1,566,402 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 1,098,287 | | | | 1,368,262 | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 533,880 | | | | 219,155 | | | | 11,452 | | | | 105,224 | | | |
Receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | 155,531 | | | | 469,062 | | | |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | 332,149 | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 147,092,322 | | | $ | 152,921,537 | | | $ | 52,291,766 | | | $ | 130,661,393 | | | |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued | | $ | 6,900,000 | | | $ | 3,350,000 | | | $ | 280,000 | | | $ | 4,850,000 | | | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | 1,471,559 | | | | 6,083,804 | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Payable for when-issued securities | | | 3,735,713 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | 405,042 | | | | 244,135 | | | | 255,232 | | | | 1,116,601 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 203,645 | | | | 550,933 | | | | 413,702 | | | | 150,203 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 134,868 | | | | 226,157 | | | | 70,045 | | | | 226,516 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 44,756 | | | | 47,076 | | | | 12,576 | | | | 39,611 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 37,097 | | | | 35,567 | | | | 13,276 | | | | 28,723 | | | |
Interest expense and fees payable | | | 17,918 | | | | 13,212 | | | | 1,605 | | | | 11,928 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 37,379 | | | | 36,315 | | | | 26,881 | | | | 32,811 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 12,987,977 | | | $ | 10,587,199 | | | $ | 1,073,317 | | | $ | 6,456,393 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 134,104,345 | | | $ | 142,334,338 | | | $ | 51,218,449 | | | $ | 124,205,000 | | | |
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 161,106,371 | | | $ | 169,427,535 | | | $ | 59,752,530 | | | $ | 147,392,098 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (13,702,287 | ) | | | (15,040,840 | ) | | | (4,993,601 | ) | | | (11,232,538 | ) | | |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (342,459 | ) | | | (349,623 | ) | | | (94,247 | ) | | | (196,353 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | | (12,957,280 | ) | | | (11,702,734 | ) | | | (3,446,233 | ) | | | (11,758,207 | ) | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 134,104,345 | | | $ | 142,334,338 | | | $ | 51,218,449 | | | $ | 124,205,000 | | | |
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 105,498,373 | | | $ | 95,681,993 | | | $ | 41,857,116 | | | $ | 93,437,007 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 13,423,548 | | | | 11,611,721 | | | | 5,146,334 | | | | 12,240,732 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.86 | | | $ | 8.24 | | | $ | 8.13 | | | $ | 7.63 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 8.25 | | | $ | 8.65 | | | $ | 8.54 | | | $ | 8.01 | | | |
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 12,207,585 | | | $ | 9,593,241 | | | $ | 4,431,126 | | | $ | 10,723,804 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 1,419,594 | | | | 1,097,961 | | | | 500,024 | | | | 1,268,634 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.60 | | | $ | 8.74 | | | $ | 8.86 | | | $ | 8.45 | | | |
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 16,398,387 | | | $ | 18,814,638 | | | $ | 4,930,207 | | | $ | 9,660,189 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 1,905,140 | | | | 2,152,044 | | | | 556,689 | | | | 1,142,127 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.61 | | | $ | 8.74 | | | $ | 8.86 | | | $ | 8.46 | | | |
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | — | | | $ | 18,244,466 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 10,384,000 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | — | | | | 2,212,540 | | | | — | | | | 1,357,634 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | — | | | $ | 8.25 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 7.65 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $25,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
See notes to financial statements72
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2009 | | Alabama Fund | | | Arkansas Fund | | | Georgia Fund | | | Kentucky Fund | | | |
|
|
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 1,532,472 | | | $ | 1,597,292 | | | $ | 2,391,648 | | | $ | 1,454,770 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 1,532,472 | | | $ | 1,597,292 | | | $ | 2,391,648 | | | $ | 1,454,770 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 80,243 | | | $ | 83,195 | | | $ | 137,635 | | | $ | 73,586 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 42,279 | | | | 48,804 | | | | 57,770 | | | | 43,623 | | | |
Class B | | | 34,913 | | | | 16,740 | | | | 32,036 | | | | 25,370 | | | |
Class C | | | 5,262 | | | | 12,855 | | | | 32,503 | | | | 9,695 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 1,376 | | | | 1,371 | | | | 1,792 | | | | 1,310 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 22,648 | | | | 22,454 | | | | 38,404 | | | | 19,810 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 11,050 | | | | 11,766 | | | | 18,446 | | | | 14,159 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 26,569 | | | | 20,392 | | | | 23,127 | | | | 20,497 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 6,201 | | | | 6,799 | | | | 8,380 | | | | 7,478 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 1,551 | | | | 3,398 | | | | 2,279 | | | | 2,843 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 23,075 | | | | 21,806 | | | | 105,526 | | | | — | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 8,772 | | | | 10,714 | | | | 10,833 | | | | 5,563 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 263,939 | | | $ | 260,294 | | | $ | 468,731 | | | $ | 223,934 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 4,077 | | | $ | 2,448 | | | $ | 4,853 | | | $ | 1,475 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 4,077 | | | $ | 2,448 | | | $ | 4,853 | | | $ | 1,475 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 259,862 | | | $ | 257,846 | | | $ | 463,878 | | | $ | 222,459 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 1,272,610 | | | $ | 1,339,446 | | | $ | 1,927,770 | | | $ | 1,232,311 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | 43,522 | | | $ | (575,717 | ) | | $ | (335,839 | ) | | $ | 86,154 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (948,114 | ) | | | (1,471,025 | ) | | | (2,133,658 | ) | | | (845,289 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (136,077 | ) | | | (498,863 | ) | | | (2,024,855 | ) | | | (71,129 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (1,040,669 | ) | | $ | (2,545,605 | ) | | $ | (4,494,352 | ) | | $ | (830,264 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | (3,182,335 | ) | | $ | (3,504,645 | ) | | $ | (4,595,904 | ) | | $ | (3,264,729 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 197,116 | | | | 380,152 | | | | 553,574 | | | | 200,982 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | (172,132 | ) | | | (221,459 | ) | | | 343,965 | | | | (226,002 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | (3,157,351 | ) | | $ | (3,345,952 | ) | | $ | (3,698,365 | ) | | $ | (3,289,749 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | $ | (4,198,020 | ) | | $ | (5,891,557 | ) | | $ | (8,192,717 | ) | | $ | (4,120,013 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets from operations | | $ | (2,925,410 | ) | | $ | (4,552,111 | ) | | $ | (6,264,947 | ) | | $ | (2,887,702 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements73
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Statements of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2009 | | Louisiana Fund | | | Maryland Fund | | | Missouri Fund | | | North Carolina Fund | | | |
|
|
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 1,167,816 | | | $ | 2,688,321 | | | $ | 2,622,374 | | | $ | 2,807,011 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 1,167,816 | | | $ | 2,688,321 | | | $ | 2,622,374 | | | $ | 2,807,011 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 46,241 | | | $ | 167,093 | | | $ | 173,611 | | | $ | 172,711 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 34,683 | | | | 69,777 | | | | 82,961 | | | | 73,611 | | | |
Class B | | | 15,104 | | | | 40,490 | | | | 30,970 | | | | 27,171 | | | |
Class C | | | 2,164 | | | | 43,992 | | | | 23,566 | | | | 35,531 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 1,013 | | | | 2,026 | | | | 2,223 | | | | 2,149 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 18,479 | | | | 38,177 | | | | 45,884 | | | | 37,822 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 7,448 | | | | 24,615 | | | | 22,627 | | | | 22,328 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 20,037 | | | | 26,310 | | | | 20,480 | | | | 23,443 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 2,849 | | | | 11,545 | | | | 11,870 | | | | 9,457 | | | |
Registration fees | | | — | | | | 7,163 | | | | 2,353 | | | | 795 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 12,235 | | | | 75,140 | | | | 33,179 | | | | 74,241 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 6,241 | | | | 10,192 | | | | 12,438 | | | | 12,050 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 166,494 | | | $ | 516,520 | | | $ | 462,162 | | | $ | 491,309 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 2,738 | | | $ | 8,999 | | | $ | 8,085 | | | $ | 3,658 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 2,738 | | | $ | 8,999 | | | $ | 8,085 | | | $ | 3,658 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 163,756 | | | $ | 507,521 | | | $ | 454,077 | | | $ | 487,651 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 1,004,060 | | | $ | 2,180,800 | | | $ | 2,168,297 | | | $ | 2,319,360 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | 23,643 | | | $ | 1,530 | | | $ | (677,088 | ) | | $ | 1,251,031 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (377,777 | ) | | | (1,305,781 | ) | | | (1,172,894 | ) | | | (4,469,045 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (1,001,199 | ) | | | (635,298 | ) | | | (1,636,051 | ) | | | 660,344 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (1,355,333 | ) | | $ | (1,939,549 | ) | | $ | (3,486,033 | ) | | $ | (2,557,670 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | (3,491,802 | ) | | $ | (8,655,839 | ) | | $ | (4,852,273 | ) | | $ | (4,907,005 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 46,207 | | | | 417,374 | | | | 229,098 | | | | (85,061 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (55,130 | ) | | | (212,769 | ) | | | (547,290 | ) | | | (135,758 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | (3,500,725 | ) | | $ | (8,451,234 | ) | | $ | (5,170,465 | ) | | $ | (5,127,824 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | $ | (4,856,058 | ) | | $ | (10,390,783 | ) | | $ | (8,656,498 | ) | | $ | (7,685,494 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets from operations | | $ | (3,851,998 | ) | | $ | (8,209,983 | ) | | $ | (6,488,201 | ) | | $ | (5,366,134 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements74
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Statements of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2009 | | Oregon Fund | | | South Carolina Fund | | | Tennessee Fund | | | Virginia Fund | | | |
|
|
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 4,044,133 | | | $ | 4,255,600 | | | $ | 1,484,624 | | | $ | 3,608,578 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 4,044,133 | | | $ | 4,255,600 | | | $ | 1,484,624 | | | $ | 3,608,578 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 266,770 | | | $ | 287,350 | | | $ | 73,744 | | | $ | 228,782 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 103,132 | | | | 93,253 | | | | 42,044 | | | | 90,431 | | | |
Class B | | | 57,953 | | | | 45,788 | | | | 21,367 | | | | 54,311 | | | |
Class C | | | 72,993 | | | | 85,912 | | | | 20,178 | | | | 39,986 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 2,891 | | | | 3,086 | | | | 1,273 | | | | 2,572 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 65,483 | | | | 51,300 | | | | 26,505 | | | | 45,584 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 22,833 | | | | 26,923 | | | | 10,956 | | | | 28,084 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 18,840 | | | | 21,109 | | | | 17,592 | | | | 23,289 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 11,544 | | | | 10,338 | | | | 6,069 | | | | 6,953 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 1,130 | | | | 290 | | | | 1,553 | | | | 2,553 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 130,131 | | | | 134,855 | | | | 11,125 | | | | 121,072 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 14,358 | | | | 14,260 | | | | 9,886 | | | | 10,159 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 768,058 | | | $ | 774,464 | | | $ | 242,292 | | | $ | 653,776 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 3,223 | | | $ | 1,327 | | | $ | 1,828 | | | $ | 6,815 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 3,223 | | | $ | 1,327 | | | $ | 1,828 | | | $ | 6,815 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 764,835 | | | $ | 773,137 | | | $ | 240,464 | | | $ | 646,961 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 3,279,298 | | | $ | 3,482,463 | | | $ | 1,244,160 | | | $ | 2,961,617 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (1,255,377 | ) | | $ | (1,170,705 | ) | | $ | (327,490 | ) | | $ | 578,556 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (8,091,786 | ) | | | (8,765,034 | ) | | | (1,454,740 | ) | | | (3,761,081 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | 1,603,501 | | | | 1,531,004 | | | | (1,541,224 | ) | | | (2,264,941 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (7,743,662 | ) | | $ | (8,404,735 | ) | | $ | (3,323,454 | ) | | $ | (5,447,466 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | (7,431,329 | ) | | $ | (7,873,367 | ) | | $ | (3,790,964 | ) | | $ | (10,417,762 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (170,127 | ) | | | (204,132 | ) | | | 377,874 | | | | 1,092,500 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | (174,561 | ) | | | 1,558 | | | | 274,403 | | | | (692,720 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | (7,776,017 | ) | | $ | (8,075,941 | ) | | $ | (3,138,687 | ) | | $ | (10,017,982 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | $ | (15,519,679 | ) | | $ | (16,480,676 | ) | | $ | (6,462,141 | ) | | $ | (15,465,448 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets from operations | | $ | (12,240,381 | ) | | $ | (12,998,213 | ) | | $ | (5,217,981 | ) | | $ | (12,503,831 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements75
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | Alabama Fund | | | Arkansas Fund | | | Georgia Fund | | | Kentucky Fund | | | |
|
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 1,272,610 | | | $ | 1,339,446 | | | $ | 1,927,770 | | | $ | 1,232,311 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (1,040,669 | ) | | | (2,545,605 | ) | | | (4,494,352 | ) | | | (830,264 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (3,157,351 | ) | | | (3,345,952 | ) | | | (3,698,365 | ) | | | (3,289,749 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations | | $ | (2,925,410 | ) | | $ | (4,552,111 | ) | | $ | (6,264,947 | ) | | $ | (2,887,702 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (1,018,680 | ) | | $ | (1,268,591 | ) | | $ | (1,483,058 | ) | | $ | (1,073,327 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (148,072 | ) | | | (77,506 | ) | | | (144,939 | ) | | | (109,681 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (22,332 | ) | | | (59,507 | ) | | | (147,125 | ) | | | (41,908 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (84,189 | ) | | | — | | | | (138,879 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (1,273,273 | ) | | $ | (1,405,604 | ) | | $ | (1,914,001 | ) | | $ | (1,224,916 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 1,382,136 | | | $ | 3,552,697 | | | $ | 3,223,347 | | | $ | 1,153,860 | | | |
Class B | | | 136,917 | | | | 150,322 | | | | 126,501 | | | | 52,169 | | | |
Class C | | | 520,388 | | | | 343,137 | | | | 1,336,065 | | | | 349,255 | | | |
Class I | | | 974,219 | | | | — | | | | 2,796,600 | | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 524,072 | | | | 832,798 | | | | 783,736 | | | | 746,859 | | | |
Class B | | | 87,135 | | | | 48,353 | | | | 76,152 | | | | 72,067 | | | |
Class C | | | 8,472 | | | | 17,160 | | | | 88,274 | | | | 27,818 | | | |
Class I | | | 749 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (9,126,220 | ) | | | (4,695,461 | ) | | | (8,865,571 | ) | | | (5,062,786 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (584,324 | ) | | | (228,103 | ) | | | (572,095 | ) | | | (376,272 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (101,036 | ) | | | (113,827 | ) | | | (1,317,011 | ) | | | (328,486 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (1,492,100 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,189,868 | ) | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 767,869 | | | | 163,965 | | | | 659,556 | | | | 637,496 | | | |
Class B | | | (767,869 | ) | | | (163,965 | ) | | | (659,556 | ) | | | (637,496 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (7,669,592 | ) | | $ | (92,924 | ) | | $ | (3,513,870 | ) | | $ | (3,365,516 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (11,868,275 | ) | | $ | (6,050,639 | ) | | $ | (11,692,818 | ) | | $ | (7,478,134 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of period | | $ | 62,684,139 | | | $ | 63,552,070 | | | $ | 89,400,474 | | | $ | 58,305,555 | | | |
|
|
At end of period | | $ | 50,815,864 | | | $ | 57,501,431 | | | $ | 77,707,656 | | | $ | 50,827,421 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of period | | $ | (45,614 | ) | | $ | (161,996 | ) | | $ | (148,271 | ) | | $ | (60,919 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements76
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | Louisiana Fund | | | Maryland Fund | | | Missouri Fund | | | North Carolina Fund | | | |
|
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 1,004,060 | | | $ | 2,180,800 | | | $ | 2,168,297 | | | $ | 2,319,360 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (1,355,333 | ) | | | (1,939,549 | ) | | | (3,486,033 | ) | | | (2,557,670 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (3,500,725 | ) | | | (8,451,234 | ) | | | (5,170,465 | ) | | | (5,127,824 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations | | $ | (3,851,998 | ) | | $ | (8,209,983 | ) | | $ | (6,488,201 | ) | | $ | (5,366,134 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (922,423 | ) | | $ | (1,838,572 | ) | | $ | (2,009,858 | ) | | $ | (1,838,112 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (71,245 | ) | | | (189,600 | ) | | | (131,592 | ) | | | (119,078 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (10,181 | ) | | | (206,069 | ) | | | (100,160 | ) | | | (156,031 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (4,241 | ) | | | — | | | | (138,844 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (1,003,849 | ) | | $ | (2,238,482 | ) | | $ | (2,241,610 | ) | | $ | (2,252,065 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 1,506,726 | | | $ | 5,955,312 | | | $ | 4,645,753 | | | $ | 6,053,176 | | | |
Class B | | | 16,846 | | | | 541,708 | | | | 290,139 | | | | 201,029 | | | |
Class C | | | 591,924 | | | | 2,652,004 | | | | 763,137 | | | | 1,743,129 | | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | 170,000 | | | | — | | | | 8,616,911 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 503,096 | | | | 1,228,697 | | | | 1,314,237 | | | | 1,114,864 | | | |
Class B | | | 26,339 | | | | 120,418 | | | | 67,354 | | | | 59,561 | | | |
Class C | | | 4,626 | | | | 120,051 | | | | 70,483 | | | | 82,019 | | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 126 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (5,375,637 | ) | | | (11,395,651 | ) | | | (7,358,540 | ) | | | (15,452,316 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (225,614 | ) | | | (1,118,523 | ) | | | (228,343 | ) | | | (423,932 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (1,427,237 | ) | | | (766,854 | ) | | | (1,144,306 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (12,527 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,826,994 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 324,553 | | | | 446,366 | | | | 264,052 | | | | 544,281 | | | |
Class B | | | (324,553 | ) | | | (446,366 | ) | | | (264,052 | ) | | | (544,281 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (2,951,694 | ) | | $ | (3,165,748 | ) | | $ | (1,202,634 | ) | | $ | (976,733 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (7,807,541 | ) | | $ | (13,614,213 | ) | | $ | (9,932,445 | ) | | $ | (8,594,932 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of period | | $ | 45,441,141 | | | $ | 101,789,233 | | | $ | 107,043,754 | | | $ | 102,090,702 | | | |
|
|
At end of period | | $ | 37,633,600 | | | $ | 88,175,020 | | | $ | 97,111,309 | | | $ | 93,495,770 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of period | | $ | (81,461 | ) | | $ | (5,615 | ) | | $ | (167,357 | ) | | $ | (46,324 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements77
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended February 28, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | Oregon Fund | | | South Carolina Fund | | | Tennessee Fund | | | Virginia Fund | | | |
|
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 3,279,298 | | | $ | 3,482,463 | | | $ | 1,244,160 | | | $ | 2,961,617 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (7,743,662 | ) | | | (8,404,735 | ) | | | (3,323,454 | ) | | | (5,447,466 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (7,776,017 | ) | | | (8,075,941 | ) | | | (3,138,687 | ) | | | (10,017,982 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations | | $ | (12,240,381 | ) | | $ | (12,998,213 | ) | | $ | (5,217,981 | ) | | $ | (12,503,831 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (2,771,378 | ) | | $ | (2,442,748 | ) | | $ | (1,076,133 | ) | | $ | (2,508,656 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (276,656 | ) | | | (212,875 | ) | | | (96,587 | ) | | | (269,715 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (348,346 | ) | | | (398,879 | ) | | | (90,996 | ) | | | (198,731 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (535,378 | ) | | | — | | | | (132,450 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (3,396,380 | ) | | $ | (3,589,880 | ) | | $ | (1,263,716 | ) | | $ | (3,109,552 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 8,561,665 | | | $ | 13,895,389 | | | $ | 2,827,531 | | | $ | 7,093,750 | | | |
Class B | | | 867,895 | | | | 356,644 | | | | 295,607 | | | | 551,353 | | | |
Class C | | | 3,016,354 | | | | 3,707,927 | | | | 1,686,027 | | | | 1,955,944 | | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | 5,523,734 | | | | — | | | | 8,713,879 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,931,227 | | | | 1,639,713 | | | | 684,846 | | | | 1,495,621 | | | |
Class B | | | 180,597 | | | | 139,726 | | | | 63,501 | | | | 179,715 | | | |
Class C | | | 239,791 | | | | 241,912 | | | | 53,270 | | | | 144,022 | | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | 1,915 | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (17,653,560 | ) | | | (20,064,078 | ) | | | (5,688,355 | ) | | | (10,224,569 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (903,848 | ) | | | (699,375 | ) | | | (343,593 | ) | | | (1,869,395 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (2,057,251 | ) | | | (3,826,272 | ) | | | (422,057 | ) | | | (748,350 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (7,473,645 | ) | | | — | | | | (385,957 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 924,225 | | | | 431,713 | | | | 253,150 | | | | 714,710 | | | |
Class B | | | (924,225 | ) | | | (431,713 | ) | | | (253,150 | ) | | | (714,710 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (5,817,130 | ) | | $ | (6,556,410 | ) | | $ | (843,223 | ) | | $ | 6,906,013 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (21,453,891 | ) | | $ | (23,144,503 | ) | | $ | (7,324,920 | ) | | $ | (8,707,370 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of period | | $ | 155,558,236 | | | $ | 165,478,841 | | | $ | 58,543,369 | | | $ | 132,912,370 | | | |
|
|
At end of period | | $ | 134,104,345 | | | $ | 142,334,338 | | | $ | 51,218,449 | | | $ | 124,205,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of period | | $ | (342,459 | ) | | $ | (349,623 | ) | | $ | (94,247 | ) | | $ | (196,353 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements78
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Year Ended August 31, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | Alabama Fund | | | Arkansas Fund | | | Georgia Fund | | | Kentucky Fund | | | |
|
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 2,424,141 | | | $ | 2,765,295 | | | $ | 3,700,508 | | | $ | 2,532,596 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (516,088 | ) | | | (1,239,974 | ) | | | (1,499,872 | ) | | | (455,168 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (1,049,849 | ) | | | (2,374,165 | ) | | | (2,392,771 | ) | | | (1,927,602 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 858,204 | | | $ | (848,844 | ) | | $ | (192,135 | ) | | $ | 149,826 | | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (1,966,064 | ) | | $ | (2,552,169 | ) | | $ | (3,084,791 | ) | | $ | (2,203,767 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (326,016 | ) | | | (179,561 | ) | | | (350,187 | ) | | | (257,596 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (40,006 | ) | | | (97,757 | ) | | | (239,359 | ) | | | (78,926 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (47,154 | ) | | | — | | | | (26,394 | ) | | | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (213,483 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Class B | | | (42,294 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Class C | | | (9,634 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (2,644,651 | ) | | $ | (2,829,487 | ) | | $ | (3,700,731 | ) | | $ | (2,540,289 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 8,990,808 | | | $ | 10,676,945 | | | $ | 16,778,465 | | | $ | 5,022,276 | | | |
Class B | | | 396,835 | | | | 228,040 | | | | 323,502 | | | | 104,100 | | | |
Class C | | | 1,492,756 | | | | 1,441,846 | | | | 4,851,647 | | | | 1,168,788 | | | |
Class I | | | 4,360,486 | | | | — | | | | 4,615,476 | | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,143,185 | | | | 1,520,986 | | | | 1,667,914 | | | | 1,457,458 | | | |
Class B | | | 221,421 | | | | 97,556 | | | | 193,297 | | | | 164,022 | | | |
Class C | | | 28,486 | | | | 28,648 | | | | 150,750 | | | | 64,387 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (5,805,012 | ) | | | (10,236,852 | ) | | | (16,383,272 | ) | | | (6,086,897 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (1,110,296 | ) | | | (934,823 | ) | | | (2,515,230 | ) | | | (1,029,774 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (1,817,388 | ) | | | (1,079,675 | ) | | | (3,316,870 | ) | | | (948,063 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (352,247 | ) | | | — | | | | (22,049 | ) | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,310,007 | | | | 374,675 | | | | 657,730 | | | | 785,340 | | | |
Class B | | | (1,310,007 | ) | | | (374,675 | ) | | | (657,730 | ) | | | (785,340 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 7,549,034 | | | $ | 1,742,671 | | | $ | 6,343,630 | | | $ | (83,703 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 5,762,587 | | | $ | (1,935,660 | ) | | $ | 2,450,764 | | | $ | (2,474,166 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 56,921,552 | | | $ | 65,487,730 | | | $ | 86,949,710 | | | $ | 60,779,721 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 62,684,139 | | | $ | 63,552,070 | | | $ | 89,400,474 | | | $ | 58,305,555 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | (44,951 | ) | | $ | (95,838 | ) | | $ | (162,040 | ) | | $ | (68,314 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements79
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Year Ended August 31, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | Louisiana Fund | | | Maryland Fund | | | Missouri Fund | | | North Carolina Fund | | | |
|
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 1,938,153 | | | $ | 4,210,781 | | | $ | 4,398,971 | | | $ | 4,265,119 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (588,345 | ) | | | (885,216 | ) | | | (1,904,557 | ) | | | (1,408,684 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (1,632,457 | ) | | | (2,918,919 | ) | | | (2,412,475 | ) | | | (2,661,362 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | (282,649 | ) | | $ | 406,646 | | | $ | 81,939 | | | $ | 195,073 | | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (1,800,900 | ) | | $ | (3,567,930 | ) | | $ | (3,961,677 | ) | | $ | (3,693,161 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (162,515 | ) | | | (428,617 | ) | | | (294,780 | ) | | | (264,702 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (3,203 | ) | | | (330,168 | ) | | | (172,033 | ) | | | (240,867 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (1,415 | ) | | | — | | | | (12,381 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (1,966,618 | ) | | $ | (4,328,130 | ) | | $ | (4,428,490 | ) | | $ | (4,211,111 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 9,699,720 | | | $ | 25,801,692 | | | $ | 20,351,449 | | | $ | 18,544,885 | | | |
Class B | | | 225,387 | | | | 490,490 | | | | 862,728 | | | | 518,360 | | | |
Class C | | | 237,722 | | | | 5,547,770 | | | | 1,766,679 | | | | 5,875,502 | | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | 95,000 | | | | — | | | | 1,338,802 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 905,857 | | | | 2,417,205 | | | | 2,535,602 | | | | 2,149,544 | | | |
Class B | | | 56,221 | | | | 266,096 | | | | 152,841 | | | | 129,363 | | | |
Class C | | | 3,178 | | | | 213,152 | | | | 122,555 | | | | 143,893 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (7,781,172 | ) | | | (19,614,960 | ) | | | (15,942,929 | ) | | | (11,495,596 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (466,875 | ) | | | (1,936,411 | ) | | | (2,019,254 | ) | | | (1,671,897 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (2,458,628 | ) | | | (615,564 | ) | | | (2,526,344 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (8,507 | ) | | | — | | | | (372,016 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 193,201 | | | | 1,264,284 | | | | 875,203 | | | | 682,633 | | | |
Class B | | | (193,201 | ) | | | (1,264,284 | ) | | | (875,203 | ) | | | (682,633 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 2,880,038 | | | $ | 10,812,899 | | | $ | 7,214,107 | | | $ | 12,634,496 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 630,771 | | | $ | 6,891,415 | | | $ | 2,867,556 | | | $ | 8,618,458 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 44,810,370 | | | $ | 94,897,818 | | | $ | 104,176,198 | | | $ | 93,472,244 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 45,441,141 | | | $ | 101,789,233 | | | $ | 107,043,754 | | | $ | 102,090,702 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | (81,672 | ) | | $ | 52,067 | | | $ | (94,044 | ) | | $ | (113,619 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements80
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Year Ended August 31, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | Oregon Fund | | | South Carolina Fund | | | Tennessee Fund | | | Virginia Fund | | | |
|
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 6,373,834 | | | $ | 6,258,464 | | | $ | 2,501,510 | | | $ | 5,928,013 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (3,785,713 | ) | | | (6,353,208 | ) | | | (1,327,310 | ) | | | (4,383,457 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (5,036,564 | ) | | | (3,009,180 | ) | | | (1,517,279 | ) | | | (4,427,908 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations | | $ | (2,448,443 | ) | | $ | (3,103,924 | ) | | $ | (343,079 | ) | | $ | (2,883,352 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (5,410,642 | ) | | $ | (4,857,426 | ) | | $ | (2,149,863 | ) | | $ | (4,962,763 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (599,917 | ) | | | (489,402 | ) | | | (207,010 | ) | | | (623,997 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (455,285 | ) | | | (656,434 | ) | | | (127,029 | ) | | | (291,995 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (288,441 | ) | | | — | | | | (9,866 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (6,465,844 | ) | | $ | (6,291,703 | ) | | $ | (2,483,902 | ) | | $ | (5,888,621 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 34,349,610 | | | $ | 35,777,637 | | | $ | 8,021,871 | | | $ | 30,139,923 | | | |
Class B | | | 1,824,285 | | | | 1,227,486 | | | | 182,469 | | | | 1,880,543 | | | |
Class C | | | 10,834,270 | | | | 12,116,920 | | | | 2,441,537 | | | | 6,244,053 | | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | 24,426,983 | | | | — | | | | 1,365,408 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 3,433,044 | | | | 3,097,541 | | | | 1,266,625 | | | | 3,067,239 | | | |
Class B | | | 350,790 | | | | 284,783 | | | | 132,793 | | | | 409,431 | | | |
Class C | | | 307,816 | | | | 413,051 | | | | 63,915 | | | | 227,077 | | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | 1,438 | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (18,411,320 | ) | | | (25,917,662 | ) | | | (7,453,927 | ) | | | (27,370,459 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (1,909,786 | ) | | | (3,435,714 | ) | | | (684,558 | ) | | | (4,534,439 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (1,805,088 | ) | | | (4,080,606 | ) | | | (941,509 | ) | | | (1,667,292 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (1,193,947 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 2,006,034 | | | | 507,748 | | | | 333,256 | | | | 1,342,000 | | | |
Class B | | | (2,006,034 | ) | | | (507,748 | ) | | | (333,256 | ) | | | (1,342,000 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 28,973,621 | | | $ | 42,717,910 | | | $ | 3,029,216 | | | $ | 9,761,484 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 20,059,334 | | | $ | 33,322,283 | | | $ | 202,235 | | | $ | 989,511 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 135,498,902 | | | $ | 132,156,558 | | | $ | 58,341,134 | | | $ | 131,922,859 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 155,558,236 | | | $ | 165,478,841 | | | $ | 58,543,369 | | | $ | 132,912,370 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | (225,377 | ) | | $ | (242,206 | ) | | $ | (74,691 | ) | | $ | (48,418 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements81
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Alabama Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.330 | | | $ | 9.600 | | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 9.890 | | | $ | 9.800 | | | $ | 9.720 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.204 | | | $ | 0.402 | | | $ | 0.394 | | | $ | 0.401 | | | $ | 0.422 | | | $ | 0.454 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.551 | ) | | | (0.232 | ) | | | (0.261 | ) | | | 0.026 | | | | 0.099 | | | | 0.085 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.347 | ) | | $ | 0.170 | | | $ | 0.133 | | | $ | 0.427 | | | $ | 0.521 | | | $ | 0.539 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.203 | ) | | $ | (0.395 | ) | | $ | (0.395 | ) | | $ | (0.407 | ) | | $ | (0.431 | ) | | $ | (0.459 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.045 | ) | | | (0.048 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.203 | ) | | $ | (0.440 | ) | | $ | (0.443 | ) | | $ | (0.407 | ) | | $ | (0.431 | ) | | $ | (0.459 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.780 | | | $ | 9.330 | | | $ | 9.600 | | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 9.890 | | | $ | 9.800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (3.72 | )%(8) | | | 1.89 | % | | | 1.30 | % | | | 4.46 | % | | | 5.43 | % | | | 5.61 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 39,373 | | | $ | 49,124 | | | $ | 44,947 | | | $ | 43,163 | | | $ | 42,390 | | | $ | 40,225 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.78 | %(3) | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.75 | %(4) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.76 | %(5) | | | 0.76 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.09 | %(3) | | | 0.11 | % | | | 0.16 | % | | | 0.09 | % | | | 0.05 | %(5) | | | 0.03 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.87 | %(3) | | | 0.87 | % | | | 0.91 | %(4) | | | 0.84 | % | | | 0.81 | %(5) | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.77 | %(3) | | | 0.74 | % | | | 0.74 | %(4) | | | 0.73 | % | | | 0.75 | %(5) | | | 0.76 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.82 | %(3) | | | 4.20 | % | | | 3.99 | % | | | 4.11 | % | | | 4.29 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 23 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 8 | %(8) | | | 12 | % | | | 29 | % | | | 31 | % | | | 16 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements82
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Alabama Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.270 | | | $ | 10.560 | | | $ | 10.900 | | | $ | 10.870 | | | $ | 10.770 | | | $ | 10.690 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.189 | | | $ | 0.363 | | | $ | 0.353 | | | $ | 0.362 | | | $ | 0.384 | | | $ | 0.423 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.611 | ) | | | (0.255 | ) | | | (0.293 | ) | | | 0.034 | | | | 0.108 | | | | 0.080 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.422 | ) | | $ | 0.108 | | | $ | 0.060 | | | $ | 0.396 | | | $ | 0.492 | | | $ | 0.503 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | $ | (0.353 | ) | | $ | (0.352 | ) | | $ | (0.366 | ) | | $ | (0.392 | ) | | $ | (0.423 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.045 | ) | | | (0.048 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | $ | (0.398 | ) | | $ | (0.400 | ) | | $ | (0.366 | ) | | $ | (0.392 | ) | | $ | (0.423 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.660 | | | $ | 10.270 | | | $ | 10.560 | | | $ | 10.900 | | | $ | 10.870 | | | $ | 10.770 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (4.04 | )%(9) | | | 1.03 | % | | | 0.51 | % | | | 3.75 | % | | | 4.81 | %(3) | | | 4.77 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 6,933 | | | $ | 8,643 | | | $ | 10,690 | | | $ | 13,854 | | | $ | 17,556 | | | $ | 19,947 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.53 | %(4) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.52 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.09 | %(4) | | | 0.11 | % | | | 0.16 | % | | | 0.09 | % | | | 0.05 | %(6) | | | 0.03 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.62 | %(4) | | | 1.63 | % | | | 1.66 | %(5) | | | 1.59 | % | | | 1.56 | %(6) | | | 1.55 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.52 | %(4) | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.49 | %(5) | | | 1.48 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.52 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.05 | %(4) | | | 3.44 | % | | | 3.25 | % | | | 3.37 | % | | | 3.55 | % | | | 3.88 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 23 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 8 | %(9) | | | 12 | % | | | 29 | % | | | 31 | % | | | 16 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.15% due to a change in the timing of payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements83
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Alabama Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.270 | | | $ | 10.560 | | | $ | 10.900 | | | $ | 10.830 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.189 | | | $ | 0.368 | | | $ | 0.351 | | | $ | 0.138 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.611 | ) | | | (0.259 | ) | | | (0.291 | ) | | | 0.089 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.422 | ) | | $ | 0.109 | | | $ | 0.060 | | | $ | 0.227 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | $ | (0.354 | ) | | $ | (0.352 | ) | | $ | (0.157 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.045 | ) | | | (0.048 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | $ | (0.399 | ) | | $ | (0.400 | ) | | $ | (0.157 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.660 | | | $ | 10.270 | | | $ | 10.560 | | | $ | 10.900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (4.04 | )%(8) | | | 1.03 | % | | | 0.51 | % | | | 2.13 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 1,327 | | | $ | 958 | | | $ | 1,285 | | | $ | 598 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.53 | %(4) | | | 1.51 | % | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | %(4) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.09 | %(4) | | | 0.11 | % | | | 0.16 | % | | | 0.09 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.62 | %(4) | | | 1.62 | % | | | 1.66 | %(5) | | | 1.59 | %(4) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.52 | %(4) | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.49 | %(5) | | | 1.48 | %(4) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.07 | %(4) | | | 3.48 | % | | | 3.23 | % | | | 2.85 | %(4) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 8 | %(8) | | | 12 | % | | | 29 | % | | | 31 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 21, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements84
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Alabama Fund — Class I |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.340 | | | $ | 9.040 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.211 | | | $ | 0.209 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.559 | ) | | | 0.300 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.348 | ) | | $ | 0.509 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.212 | ) | | $ | (0.209 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.212 | ) | | $ | (0.209 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.780 | | | $ | 9.340 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (3.63 | )%(7) | | | 5.64 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 3,183 | | | $ | 3,958 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.58 | %(4) | | | 0.56 | %(4) | | |
Interest and fee expense(5) | | | 0.09 | %(4) | | | 0.11 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.67 | %(4) | | | 0.67 | %(4) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.57 | %(4) | | | 0.54 | %(4) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.98 | %(4) | | | 4.47 | %(4) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 8 | %(7) | | | 12 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(6) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2008. |
|
(7) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements85
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Arkansas Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited)(1) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.160 | | | $ | 9.710 | | | $ | 9.970 | | | $ | 9.870 | | | $ | 9.880 | | | $ | 9.730 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.199 | | | $ | 0.415 | | | $ | 0.419 | | | $ | 0.438 | | | $ | 0.460 | | | $ | 0.483 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.840 | ) | | | (0.540 | ) | | | (0.254 | ) | | | 0.100 | | | | (0.002 | ) | | | 0.150 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.641 | ) | | $ | (0.125 | ) | | $ | 0.165 | | | $ | 0.538 | | | $ | 0.458 | | | $ | 0.633 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.209 | ) | | $ | (0.425 | ) | | $ | (0.425 | ) | | $ | (0.438 | ) | | $ | (0.468 | ) | | $ | (0.483 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.209 | ) | | $ | (0.425 | ) | | $ | (0.425 | ) | | $ | (0.438 | ) | | $ | (0.468 | ) | | $ | (0.483 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.310 | | | $ | 9.160 | | | $ | 9.710 | | | $ | 9.970 | | | $ | 9.870 | | | $ | 9.880 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (7.00 | )%(8) | | | (1.21 | )% | | | 1.61 | % | | | 5.61 | % | | | 4.74 | % | | | 6.58 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 50,960 | | | $ | 56,405 | | | $ | 57,319 | | | $ | 46,779 | | | $ | 36,014 | | | $ | 33,215 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.78 | %(3) | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.75 | %(4) | | | 0.74 | % | | | 0.74 | %(5) | | | 0.72 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.08 | %(3) | | | 0.14 | % | | | 0.20 | % | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.13 | %(5) | | | 0.07 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.86 | %(3) | | | 0.90 | % | | | 0.95 | %(4) | | | 0.95 | % | | | 0.87 | %(5) | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.77 | %(3) | | | 0.73 | % | | | 0.72 | %(4) | | | 0.71 | % | | | 0.73 | %(5) | | | 0.72 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.96 | %(3) | | | 4.37 | % | | | 4.19 | % | | | 4.46 | % | | | 4.65 | % | | | 4.86 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 4 | %(8) | | | 15 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 18 | % | | | 14 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements86
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Arkansas Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 10.430 | | | $ | 10.710 | | | $ | 10.610 | | | $ | 10.610 | | | $ | 10.460 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.182 | | | $ | 0.371 | | | $ | 0.372 | | | $ | 0.393 | | | $ | 0.416 | | | $ | 0.443 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.912 | ) | | | (0.573 | ) | | | (0.275 | ) | | | 0.098 | | | | 0.007 | | | | 0.145 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.730 | ) | | $ | (0.202 | ) | | $ | 0.097 | | | $ | 0.491 | | | $ | 0.423 | | | $ | 0.588 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.190 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.391 | ) | | $ | (0.423 | ) | | $ | (0.438 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.190 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.391 | ) | | $ | (0.423 | ) | | $ | (0.438 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.930 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 10.430 | | | $ | 10.710 | | | $ | 10.610 | | | $ | 10.610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (7.32 | )%(9) | | | (1.97 | )% | | | 0.85 | % | | | 4.75 | % | | | 4.23 | %(3) | | | 5.68 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 3,567 | | | $ | 4,157 | | | $ | 5,413 | | | $ | 8,166 | | | $ | 8,924 | | | $ | 10,354 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.53 | %(4) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.49 | %(6) | | | 1.47 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.08 | %(4) | | | 0.14 | % | | | 0.20 | % | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.13 | %(6) | | | 0.07 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.61 | %(4) | | | 1.64 | % | | | 1.70 | %(5) | | | 1.71 | % | | | 1.62 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.52 | %(4) | | | 1.48 | % | | | 1.47 | %(5) | | | 1.46 | % | | | 1.48 | %(6) | | | 1.47 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.21 | %(4) | | | 3.63 | % | | | 3.47 | % | | | 3.72 | % | | | 3.92 | % | | | 4.13 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 4 | %(9) | | | 15 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 18 | % | | | 14 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.17% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements87
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Arkansas Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 10.420 | | | $ | 10.710 | | | $ | 10.550 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.181 | | | $ | 0.369 | | | $ | 0.364 | | | $ | 0.112 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.911 | ) | | | (0.562 | ) | | | (0.277 | ) | | | 0.177 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.730 | ) | | $ | (0.193 | ) | | $ | 0.087 | | | $ | 0.289 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.190 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.129 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.190 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.129 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.930 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 10.420 | | | $ | 10.710 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (7.32 | )%(8) | | | (1.88 | )% | | | 0.76 | % | | | 2.76 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 2,974 | | | $ | 2,989 | | | $ | 2,756 | | | $ | 638 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.53 | %(4) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | | 1.49 | %(4) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.08 | %(4) | | | 0.14 | % | | | 0.20 | % | | | 0.21 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.61 | %(4) | | | 1.66 | % | | | 1.70 | %(5) | | | 1.70 | %(4) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.52 | %(4) | | | 1.48 | % | | | 1.47 | %(5) | | | 1.46 | %(4) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.20 | %(4) | | | 3.62 | % | | | 3.41 | % | | | 3.07 | %(4) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 4 | %(8) | | | 15 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 18 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, April 28, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements88
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Georgia Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.730 | | | $ | 9.130 | | | $ | 9.460 | | | $ | 9.510 | | | $ | 9.480 | | | $ | 9.260 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.197 | | | $ | 0.393 | | | $ | 0.393 | | | $ | 0.420 | | | $ | 0.448 | | | $ | 0.473 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.751 | ) | | | (0.399 | ) | | | (0.321 | ) | | | (0.044 | ) | | | 0.039 | | | | 0.213 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.554 | ) | | $ | (0.006 | ) | | $ | 0.072 | | | $ | 0.376 | | | $ | 0.487 | | | $ | 0.686 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.196 | ) | | $ | (0.394 | ) | | $ | (0.402 | ) | | $ | (0.426 | ) | | $ | (0.457 | ) | | $ | (0.466 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.196 | ) | | $ | (0.394 | ) | | $ | (0.402 | ) | | $ | (0.426 | ) | | $ | (0.457 | ) | | $ | (0.466 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 7.980 | | | $ | 8.730 | | | $ | 9.130 | | | $ | 9.460 | | | $ | 9.510 | | | $ | 9.480 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (6.22 | )%(8) | | | (0.07 | )% | | | 0.71 | % | | | 4.10 | % | | | 5.25 | % | | | 7.52 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 58,330 | | | $ | 68,832 | | | $ | 69,269 | | | $ | 49,431 | | | $ | 42,511 | | | $ | 38,229 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.83 | %(3) | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.76 | %(4) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.77 | %(5) | | | 0.78 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.28 | %(3) | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.29 | % | | | 0.45 | % | | | 0.34 | %(5) | | | 0.24 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.11 | %(3) | | | 0.98 | % | | | 1.05 | %(4) | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.11 | %(5) | | | 1.02 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.82 | %(3) | | | 0.74 | % | | | 0.71 | %(4) | | | 0.73 | % | | | 0.75 | %(5) | | | 0.78 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.16 | %(3) | | | 4.37 | % | | | 4.18 | % | | | 4.49 | % | | | 4.71 | % | | | 5.02 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2 | %(7) | | | 3 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 10 | %(8) | | | 34 | % | | | 12 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 11 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements89
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Georgia Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.320 | | | $ | 9.750 | | | $ | 10.100 | | | $ | 10.150 | | | $ | 10.130 | | | $ | 9.900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.180 | | | $ | 0.348 | | | $ | 0.347 | | | $ | 0.375 | | | $ | 0.404 | | | $ | 0.435 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.794 | ) | | | (0.433 | ) | | | (0.343 | ) | | | (0.046 | ) | | | 0.028 | | | | 0.218 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.614 | ) | | $ | (0.085 | ) | | $ | 0.004 | | | $ | 0.329 | | | $ | 0.432 | | | $ | 0.653 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.176 | ) | | $ | (0.345 | ) | | $ | (0.354 | ) | | $ | (0.379 | ) | | $ | (0.412 | ) | | $ | (0.423 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.176 | ) | | $ | (0.345 | ) | | $ | (0.354 | ) | | $ | (0.379 | ) | | $ | (0.412 | ) | | $ | (0.423 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.530 | | | $ | 9.320 | | | $ | 9.750 | | | $ | 10.100 | | | $ | 10.150 | | | $ | 10.130 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (6.59 | )%(9) | | | (0.78 | )% | | | (0.02 | )% | | | 3.35 | % | | | 4.52 | %(3) | | | 6.69 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 6,505 | | | $ | 8,301 | | | $ | 11,363 | | | $ | 13,382 | | | $ | 15,075 | | | $ | 15,860 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.57 | %(4) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.51 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.52 | %(6) | | | 1.53 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.28 | %(4) | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.29 | % | | | 0.45 | % | | | 0.34 | %(6) | | | 0.24 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.85 | %(4) | | | 1.73 | % | | | 1.80 | %(5) | | | 1.95 | % | | | 1.86 | %(6) | | | 1.77 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.56 | %(4) | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.46 | %(5) | | | 1.48 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.53 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.40 | %(4) | | | 3.62 | % | | | 3.44 | % | | | 3.75 | % | | | 3.98 | % | | | 4.27 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2 | %(8) | | | 3 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 10 | %(9) | | | 34 | % | | | 12 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 11 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.18% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements90
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Georgia Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.330 | | | $ | 9.760 | | | $ | 10.100 | | | $ | 9.980 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.180 | | | $ | 0.345 | | | $ | 0.342 | | | $ | 0.116 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.794 | ) | | | (0.429 | ) | | | (0.328 | ) | | | 0.133 | (3) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.614 | ) | | $ | (0.084 | ) | | $ | 0.014 | | | $ | 0.249 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.176 | ) | | $ | (0.346 | ) | | $ | (0.354 | ) | | $ | (0.129 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.176 | ) | | $ | (0.346 | ) | | $ | (0.354 | ) | | $ | (0.129 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.540 | | | $ | 9.330 | | | $ | 9.760 | | | $ | 10.100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | (6.49 | )%(9) | | | (0.88 | )% | | | 0.08 | % | | | 2.52 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 7,050 | | | $ | 7,688 | | | $ | 6,318 | | | $ | 1,185 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.58 | %(5) | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.28 | %(5) | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.29 | % | | | 0.45 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.86 | %(5) | | | 1.74 | % | | | 1.80 | %(6) | | | 1.95 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.57 | %(5) | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.46 | %(6) | | | 1.48 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.41 | %(5) | | | 3.60 | % | | | 3.41 | % | | | 3.28 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 10 | %(9) | | | 34 | % | | | 12 | % | | | 20 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, April 25, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements91
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Georgia Fund — Class I |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.750 | | | $ | 8.400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.205 | | | $ | 0.208 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.751 | ) | | | 0.347 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.546 | ) | | $ | 0.555 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.204 | ) | | $ | (0.205 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.204 | ) | | $ | (0.205 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.000 | | | $ | 8.750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (6.11 | )%(7) | | | 6.62 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 5,823 | | | $ | 4,579 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.63 | %(4) | | | 0.58 | %(4) | | |
Interest and fee expense(5) | | | 0.28 | %(4) | | | 0.21 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.91 | %(4) | | | 0.79 | %(4) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.62 | %(4) | | | 0.55 | %(4) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.39 | %(4) | | | 4.75 | %(4) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 10 | %(7) | | | 34 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(6) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2008. |
|
(7) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements92
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Kentucky Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.610 | | | $ | 8.970 | | | $ | 9.240 | | | $ | 9.320 | | | $ | 9.320 | | | $ | 9.240 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.193 | | | $ | 0.386 | | | $ | 0.399 | | | $ | 0.400 | | | $ | 0.424 | | | $ | 0.442 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.571 | ) | | | (0.359 | ) | | | (0.277 | ) | | | (0.074 | ) | | | 0.005 | (2) | | | 0.077 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | 0.027 | | | $ | 0.122 | | | $ | 0.326 | | | $ | 0.429 | | | $ | 0.519 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.192 | ) | | $ | (0.387 | ) | | $ | (0.392 | ) | | $ | (0.406 | ) | | $ | (0.429 | ) | | $ | (0.439 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.192 | ) | | $ | (0.387 | ) | | $ | (0.392 | ) | | $ | (0.406 | ) | | $ | (0.429 | ) | | $ | (0.439 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.040 | | | $ | 8.610 | | | $ | 8.970 | | | $ | 9.240 | | | $ | 9.320 | | | $ | 9.320 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (4.31 | )%(9) | | | 0.29 | % | | | 1.31 | % | | | 3.63 | % | | | 4.71 | % | | | 5.70 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 43,825 | | | $ | 49,880 | | | $ | 50,736 | | | $ | 52,188 | | | $ | 50,371 | | | $ | 47,288 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.77 | %(6) | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.78 | %(4) | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.77 | %(5) | | | 0.78 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | — | | | | 0.03 | % | | | 0.06 | % | | | 0.06 | % | | | 0.05 | %(5) | | | 0.02 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.77 | %(6) | | | 0.80 | % | | | 0.84 | %(4) | | | 0.85 | % | | | 0.82 | %(5) | | | 0.80 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.76 | %(6) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.76 | %(4) | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.75 | %(5) | | | 0.77 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.95 | %(6) | | | 4.35 | % | | | 4.35 | % | | | 4.37 | % | | | 4.56 | % | | | 4.77 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 10 | %(9) | | | 19 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 11 | % | | | 22 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Annualized. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements93
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Kentucky Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.300 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.970 | | | $ | 10.050 | | | $ | 10.060 | | | $ | 9.970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.176 | | | $ | 0.345 | | | $ | 0.356 | | | $ | 0.359 | | | $ | 0.384 | | | $ | 0.406 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.623 | ) | | | (0.383 | ) | | | (0.298 | ) | | | (0.076 | ) | | | (0.007 | ) | | | 0.081 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.447 | ) | | $ | (0.038 | ) | | $ | 0.058 | | | $ | 0.283 | | | $ | 0.377 | | | $ | 0.487 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.173 | ) | | $ | (0.342 | ) | | $ | (0.348 | ) | | $ | (0.363 | ) | | $ | (0.387 | ) | | $ | (0.397 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.173 | ) | | $ | (0.342 | ) | | $ | (0.348 | ) | | $ | (0.363 | ) | | $ | (0.387 | ) | | $ | (0.397 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.680 | | | $ | 9.300 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.970 | | | $ | 10.050 | | | $ | 10.060 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (4.74 | )%(9) | | | (0.41 | )% | | | 0.56 | % | | | 2.92 | % | | | 3.99 | %(3) | | | 4.96 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 4,905 | | | $ | 6,236 | | | $ | 8,050 | | | $ | 10,122 | | | $ | 13,305 | | | $ | 16,433 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.52 | %(4) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.52 | %(6) | | | 1.53 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | — | | | | 0.03 | % | | | 0.06 | % | | | 0.06 | % | | | 0.05 | %(6) | | | 0.02 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.52 | %(4) | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.59 | %(5) | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.57 | %(6) | | | 1.55 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.51 | %(4) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.51 | %(5) | | | 1.51 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.52 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.18 | %(4) | | | 3.60 | % | | | 3.60 | % | | | 3.63 | % | | | 3.82 | % | | | 4.00 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 10 | %(9) | | | 19 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 11 | % | | | 22 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.17% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements94
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Kentucky Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.300 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.970 | | | $ | 9.940 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.176 | | | $ | 0.346 | | | $ | 0.354 | | | $ | 0.147 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.623 | ) | | | (0.384 | ) | | | (0.296 | ) | | | 0.037 | (3) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.447 | ) | | $ | (0.038 | ) | | $ | 0.058 | | | $ | 0.184 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.173 | ) | | $ | (0.342 | ) | | $ | (0.348 | ) | | $ | (0.154 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.173 | ) | | $ | (0.342 | ) | | $ | (0.348 | ) | | $ | (0.154 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.680 | | | $ | 9.300 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | (4.74 | )%(9) | | | (0.41 | )% | | | 0.56 | % | | | 1.89 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 2,098 | | | $ | 2,189 | | | $ | 1,994 | | | $ | 297 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.52 | %(5) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.53 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | — | | | | 0.03 | % | | | 0.06 | % | | | 0.06 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.52 | %(5) | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.59 | %(6) | | | 1.60 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.51 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.51 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.20 | %(5) | | | 3.61 | % | | | 3.59 | % | | | 3.37 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 10 | %(9) | | | 19 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 11 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 23, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements95
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Louisiana Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.170 | | | $ | 9.660 | | | $ | 9.960 | | | $ | 9.960 | | | $ | 9.840 | | | $ | 9.610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.213 | | | $ | 0.423 | | | $ | 0.425 | | | $ | 0.449 | | | $ | 0.460 | | | $ | 0.485 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.911 | ) | | | (0.484 | ) | | | (0.285 | ) | | | — | | | | 0.123 | | | | 0.217 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.698 | ) | | $ | (0.061 | ) | | $ | 0.140 | | | $ | 0.449 | | | $ | 0.583 | | | $ | 0.702 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.212 | ) | | $ | (0.429 | ) | | $ | (0.440 | ) | | $ | (0.449 | ) | | $ | (0.463 | ) | | $ | (0.472 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.212 | ) | | $ | (0.429 | ) | | $ | (0.440 | ) | | $ | (0.449 | ) | | $ | (0.463 | ) | | $ | (0.472 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.260 | | | $ | 9.170 | | | $ | 9.660 | | | $ | 9.960 | | | $ | 9.960 | | | $ | 9.840 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (7.49 | )%(8) | | | (0.65 | )% | | | 1.36 | % | | | 4.66 | % | | | 6.04 | % | | | 7.44 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 33,804 | | | $ | 41,310 | | | $ | 40,323 | | | $ | 26,972 | | | $ | 22,317 | | | $ | 17,793 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.74 | %(3) | | | 0.72 | % | | | 0.72 | %(4) | | | 0.71 | % | | | 0.76 | %(5) | | | 0.76 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.06 | %(3) | | | 0.15 | % | | | 0.26 | % | | | 0.26 | % | | | 0.14 | %(5) | | | 0.08 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.80 | %(3) | | | 0.87 | % | | | 0.98 | %(4) | | | 0.97 | % | | | 0.90 | %(5) | | | 0.84 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.72 | %(3) | | | 0.70 | % | | | 0.67 | %(4) | | | 0.68 | % | | | 0.75 | %(5) | | | 0.75 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.32 | %(3) | | | 4.46 | % | | | 4.28 | % | | | 4.57 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | | 4.98 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 18 | %(8) | | | 22 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 12 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements96
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Louisiana Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.690 | | | $ | 10.210 | | | $ | 10.530 | | | $ | 10.520 | | | $ | 10.400 | | | $ | 10.150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.192 | | | $ | 0.373 | | | $ | 0.374 | | | $ | 0.399 | | | $ | 0.411 | | | $ | 0.438 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.962 | ) | | | (0.519 | ) | | | (0.309 | ) | | | 0.006 | | | | 0.120 | | | | 0.233 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.770 | ) | | $ | (0.146 | ) | | $ | 0.065 | | | $ | 0.405 | | | $ | 0.531 | | | $ | 0.671 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.190 | ) | | $ | (0.374 | ) | | $ | (0.385 | ) | | $ | (0.395 | ) | | $ | (0.411 | ) | | $ | (0.421 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.190 | ) | | $ | (0.374 | ) | | $ | (0.385 | ) | | $ | (0.395 | ) | | $ | (0.411 | ) | | $ | (0.421 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.730 | | | $ | 9.690 | | | $ | 10.210 | | | $ | 10.530 | | | $ | 10.520 | | | $ | 10.400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (7.86 | )%(9) | | | (1.46 | )% | | | 0.57 | % | | | 3.97 | % | | | 5.36 | %(3) | | | 6.72 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 2,986 | | | $ | 3,891 | | | $ | 4,487 | | | $ | 6,124 | | | $ | 8,285 | | | $ | 9,444 | | | |
|
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.49 | %(4) | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.47 | %(5) | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.06 | %(4) | | | 0.15 | % | | | 0.26 | % | | | 0.26 | % | | | 0.14 | %(6) | | | 0.08 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.55 | %(4) | | | 1.62 | % | | | 1.73 | %(5) | | | 1.73 | % | | | 1.65 | %(6) | | | 1.59 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.47 | %(4) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.42 | %(5) | | | 1.44 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.55 | %(4) | | | 3.71 | % | | | 3.56 | % | | | 3.84 | % | | | 3.91 | % | | | 4.23 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 18 | %(9) | | | 22 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 12 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.17% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements97
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Louisiana Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.710 | | | $ | 10.230 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.189 | | | $ | 0.286 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | | (0.969 | ) | | | (0.528 | ) | | |
|
|
Total loss from operations | | $ | (0.780 | ) | | $ | (0.242 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.190 | ) | | $ | (0.278 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.190 | ) | | $ | (0.278 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.740 | | | $ | 9.710 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (7.85 | )%(7) | | | (2.47 | )%(7) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 844 | | | $ | 240 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.47 | %(4) | | | 1.47 | %(4) | | |
Interest and fee expense(5) | | | 0.06 | %(4) | | | 0.15 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.53 | %(4) | | | 1.62 | %(4) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.46 | %(4) | | | 1.44 | %(4) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.52 | %(4) | | | 3.90 | %(4) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 18 | %(7) | | | 22 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, December 4, 2007, to August 31, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(6) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2008. |
|
(7) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements98
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Maryland Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.900 | | | $ | 9.260 | | | $ | 9.620 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.490 | | | $ | 9.500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.201 | | | $ | 0.404 | | | $ | 0.411 | | | $ | 0.454 | | | $ | 0.442 | | | $ | 0.459 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.884 | ) | | | (0.348 | ) | | | (0.347 | ) | | | 0.005 | | | | 0.094 | | | | 0.022 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.683 | ) | | $ | 0.056 | | | $ | 0.064 | | | $ | 0.459 | | | $ | 0.536 | | | $ | 0.481 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.207 | ) | | $ | (0.416 | ) | | $ | (0.424 | ) | | $ | (0.429 | ) | | $ | (0.436 | ) | | $ | (0.449 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.042 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.207 | ) | | $ | (0.416 | ) | | $ | (0.424 | ) | | $ | (0.429 | ) | | $ | (0.436 | ) | | $ | (0.491 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.010 | | | $ | 8.900 | | | $ | 9.260 | | | $ | 9.620 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.490 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (7.60 | )%(8) | | | 0.60 | % | | | 0.59 | % | | | 4.94 | % | | | 5.77 | % | | | 5.14 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 69,604 | | | $ | 81,774 | | | $ | 75,025 | | | $ | 55,380 | | | $ | 45,791 | | | $ | 45,913 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.86 | %(3) | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.78 | %(4) | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.80 | %(5) | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.17 | %(3) | | | 0.23 | % | | | 0.41 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.28 | %(5) | | | 0.03 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.03 | %(3) | | | 1.00 | % | | | 1.19 | %(4) | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.08 | %(5) | | | 0.82 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.83 | %(3) | | | 0.74 | % | | | 0.73 | %(4) | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.13 | %(3) | | | 4.41 | % | | | 4.29 | % | | | 4.78 | % | | | 4.64 | % | | | 4.84 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 5 | %(8) | | | 15 | % | | | 6 | % | | | 15 | % | | | 10 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements99
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Maryland Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.700 | | | $ | 10.090 | | | $ | 10.490 | | | $ | 10.460 | | | $ | 10.350 | | | $ | 10.360 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.187 | | | $ | 0.368 | | | $ | 0.373 | | | $ | 0.419 | | | $ | 0.405 | | | $ | 0.426 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.956 | ) | | | (0.382 | ) | | | (0.388 | ) | | | 0.002 | | | | 0.103 | | | | 0.018 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.769 | ) | | $ | (0.014 | ) | | $ | (0.015 | ) | | $ | 0.421 | | | $ | 0.508 | | | $ | 0.444 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.191 | ) | | $ | (0.376 | ) | | $ | (0.385 | ) | | $ | (0.391 | ) | | $ | (0.398 | ) | | $ | (0.412 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.042 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.191 | ) | | $ | (0.376 | ) | | $ | (0.385 | ) | | $ | (0.391 | ) | | $ | (0.398 | ) | | $ | (0.454 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.740 | | | $ | 9.700 | | | $ | 10.090 | | | $ | 10.490 | | | $ | 10.460 | | | $ | 10.350 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (7.87 | )%(9) | | | (0.15 | )% | | | (0.22 | )% | | | 4.14 | % | | | 5.17 | %(3) | | | 4.34 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 8,185 | | | $ | 10,140 | | | $ | 12,995 | | | $ | 17,178 | | | $ | 19,783 | | | $ | 25,455 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.61 | %(4) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.55 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.17 | %(4) | | | 0.23 | % | | | 0.41 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.28 | %(6) | | | 0.03 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.78 | %(4) | | | 1.75 | % | | | 1.94 | %(5) | | | 2.30 | % | | | 1.83 | %(6) | | | 1.57 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.58 | %(4) | | | 1.48 | % | | | 1.48 | %(5) | | | 1.51 | % | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.37 | %(4) | | | 3.67 | % | | | 3.56 | % | | | 4.05 | % | | | 3.90 | % | | | 4.05 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 5 | %(9) | | | 15 | % | | | 6 | % | | | 15 | % | | | 10 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.17% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements100
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Maryland Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.710 | | | $ | 10.090 | | | $ | 10.470 | | | $ | 10.340 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.188 | | | $ | 0.364 | | | $ | 0.366 | | | $ | 0.115 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.967 | ) | | | (0.368 | ) | | | (0.361 | ) | | | 0.146 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.779 | ) | | $ | (0.004 | ) | | $ | 0.005 | | | $ | 0.261 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.191 | ) | | $ | (0.376 | ) | | $ | (0.385 | ) | | $ | (0.131 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.191 | ) | | $ | (0.376 | ) | | $ | (0.385 | ) | | $ | (0.131 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.740 | | | $ | 9.710 | | | $ | 10.090 | | | $ | 10.470 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (7.96 | )%(8) | | | (0.05 | )% | | | (0.03 | )% | | | 2.54 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| �� | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 10,133 | | | $ | 9,790 | | | $ | 6,878 | | | $ | 342 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.61 | %(4) | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | | 1.54 | %(4) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.17 | %(4) | | | 0.23 | % | | | 0.41 | % | | | 0.76 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.78 | %(4) | | | 1.76 | % | | | 1.94 | %(5) | | | 2.30 | %(4) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.58 | %(4) | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.48 | %(5) | | | 1.51 | %(4) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.39 | %(4) | | | 3.65 | % | | | 3.53 | % | | | 3.31 | %(4) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 5 | %(8) | | | 15 | % | | | 6 | % | | | 15 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, May 2, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements101
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Maryland Fund — Class I |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.900 | | | $ | 8.600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.211 | | | $ | 0.206 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.886 | ) | | | 0.310 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.675 | ) | | $ | 0.516 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.215 | ) | | $ | (0.216 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.215 | ) | | $ | (0.216 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.010 | | | $ | 8.900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (7.50 | )%(7) | | | 6.01 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 253 | | | $ | 85 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.64 | %(4) | | | 0.58 | %(4) | | |
Interest and fee expense(5) | | | 0.17 | %(4) | | | 0.23 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.81 | %(4) | | | 0.81 | %(4) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.63 | %(4) | | | 0.54 | %(4) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.45 | %(4) | | | 4.60 | %(4) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 5 | %(7) | | | 15 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(6) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2008. |
|
(7) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements102
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Missouri Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.370 | | | $ | 9.750 | | | $ | 10.120 | | | $ | 10.180 | | | $ | 10.080 | | | $ | 9.890 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.196 | | | $ | 0.406 | | | $ | 0.415 | | | $ | 0.441 | | | $ | 0.462 | | | $ | 0.497 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.733 | ) | | | (0.377 | ) | | | (0.368 | ) | | | (0.058 | ) | | | 0.116 | | | | 0.232 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.537 | ) | | $ | 0.029 | | | $ | 0.047 | | | $ | 0.383 | | | $ | 0.578 | | | $ | 0.729 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.203 | ) | | $ | (0.409 | ) | | $ | (0.417 | ) | | $ | (0.443 | ) | | $ | (0.478 | ) | | $ | (0.539 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.203 | ) | | $ | (0.409 | ) | | $ | (0.417 | ) | | $ | (0.443 | ) | | $ | (0.478 | ) | | $ | (0.539 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.630 | | | $ | 9.370 | | | $ | 9.750 | | | $ | 10.120 | | | $ | 10.180 | | | $ | 10.080 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (5.65 | )%(8) | | | 0.29 | % | | | 0.41 | % | | | 3.91 | % | | | 5.87 | % | | | 7.53 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 85,295 | | | $ | 94,078 | | | $ | 90,059 | | | $ | 64,947 | | | $ | 55,806 | | | $ | 44,385 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.82 | %(3) | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.75 | %(4) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | | 0.81 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.07 | %(3) | | | 0.08 | % | | | 0.17 | % | | | 0.27 | % | | | 0.21 | %(5) | | | 0.13 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.89 | %(3) | | | 0.84 | % | | | 0.92 | %(4) | | | 1.02 | % | | | 1.00 | %(5) | | | 0.94 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.80 | %(3) | | | 0.74 | % | | | 0.71 | %(4) | | | 0.71 | % | | | 0.76 | %(5) | | | 0.80 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.69 | %(3) | | | 4.21 | % | | | 4.12 | % | | | 4.41 | % | | | 4.58 | % | | | 4.99 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 16 | %(8) | | | 18 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 27 | % | | | 6 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements103
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Missouri Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.360 | | | $ | 10.770 | | | $ | 11.180 | | | $ | 11.250 | | | $ | 11.140 | | | $ | 10.930 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.182 | | | $ | 0.370 | | | $ | 0.377 | | | $ | 0.407 | | | $ | 0.429 | | | $ | 0.474 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.825 | ) | | | (0.410 | ) | | | (0.409 | ) | | | (0.071 | ) | | | 0.125 | | | | 0.244 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.643 | ) | | $ | (0.040 | ) | | $ | (0.032 | ) | | $ | 0.336 | | | $ | 0.554 | | | $ | 0.718 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.187 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.406 | ) | | $ | (0.444 | ) | | $ | (0.508 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.187 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.406 | ) | | $ | (0.444 | ) | | $ | (0.508 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.530 | | | $ | 10.360 | | | $ | 10.770 | | | $ | 11.180 | | | $ | 11.250 | | | $ | 11.140 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (6.14 | )%(9) | | | (0.39 | )% | | | (0.35 | )% | | | 3.10 | % | | | 5.26 | %(3) | | | 6.71 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 6,669 | | | $ | 7,404 | | | $ | 9,626 | | | $ | 11,169 | | | $ | 13,142 | | | $ | 12,903 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.57 | %(4) | | | 1.51 | % | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | | 1.56 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.07 | %(4) | | | 0.08 | % | | | 0.17 | % | | | 0.27 | % | | | 0.21 | %(6) | | | 0.13 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.64 | %(4) | | | 1.59 | % | | | 1.67 | %(5) | | | 1.77 | % | | | 1.75 | %(6) | | | 1.69 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.55 | %(4) | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.46 | %(5) | | | 1.46 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.55 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.94 | %(4) | | | 3.47 | % | | | 3.38 | % | | | 3.68 | % | | | 3.85 | % | | | 4.26 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 16 | %(9) | | | 18 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 27 | % | | | 6 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.16% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements104
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Missouri Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.350 | | | $ | 10.770 | | | $ | 11.170 | | | $ | 11.140 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.182 | | | $ | 0.364 | | | $ | 0.371 | | | $ | 0.189 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.815 | ) | | | (0.414 | ) | | | (0.393 | ) | | | 0.052 | (3) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.633 | ) | | $ | (0.050 | ) | | $ | (0.022 | ) | | $ | 0.241 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.187 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.211 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.187 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.211 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.530 | | | $ | 10.350 | | | $ | 10.770 | | | $ | 11.170 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | (6.05 | )%(9) | | | (0.48 | )% | | | (0.26 | )% | | | 2.20 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 5,147 | | | $ | 5,561 | | | $ | 4,491 | | | $ | 1,117 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.57 | %(5) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.07 | %(5) | | | 0.08 | % | | | 0.17 | % | | | 0.27 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.64 | %(5) | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.67 | %(6) | | | 1.77 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.55 | %(5) | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.46 | %(6) | | | 1.46 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.94 | %(5) | | | 3.42 | % | | | 3.35 | % | | | 3.17 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 16 | %(9) | | | 18 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 27 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, February 16, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements105
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | North Carolina Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.810 | | | $ | 9.160 | | | $ | 9.370 | | | $ | 9.340 | | | $ | 9.390 | | | $ | 9.320 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.202 | | | $ | 0.400 | | | $ | 0.404 | | | $ | 0.410 | | | $ | 0.419 | | | $ | 0.436 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.646 | ) | | | (0.355 | ) | | | (0.212 | ) | | | 0.025 | | | | (0.052 | ) | | | 0.071 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.444 | ) | | $ | 0.045 | | | $ | 0.192 | | | $ | 0.435 | | | $ | 0.367 | | | $ | 0.507 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.196 | ) | | $ | (0.395 | ) | | $ | (0.402 | ) | | $ | (0.405 | ) | | $ | (0.417 | ) | | $ | (0.437 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.196 | ) | | $ | (0.395 | ) | | $ | (0.402 | ) | | $ | (0.405 | ) | | $ | (0.417 | ) | | $ | (0.437 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.170 | | | $ | 8.810 | | | $ | 9.160 | | | $ | 9.370 | | | $ | 9.340 | | | $ | 9.390 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (4.83 | )%(8) | | | 0.49 | % | | | 2.04 | % | | | 4.80 | % | | | 4.00 | % | | | 5.52 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 71,486 | | | $ | 86,348 | | | $ | 79,909 | | | $ | 67,480 | | | $ | 57,823 | | | $ | 61,704 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.81 | %(3) | | | 0.78 | % | | | 0.77 | %(4) | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.16 | %(3) | | | 0.29 | % | | | 0.58 | % | | | 0.38 | % | | | 0.16 | %(5) | | | 0.19 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.97 | %(3) | | | 1.07 | % | | | 1.35 | %(4) | | | 1.15 | % | | | 0.95 | %(5) | | | 0.98 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.80 | %(3) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.74 | %(4) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.13 | %(3) | | | 4.41 | % | | | 4.32 | % | | | 4.43 | % | | | 4.48 | % | | | 4.65 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 34 | %(8) | | | 23 | % | | | 9 | % | | | 18 | % | | | 8 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements106
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | North Carolina Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.470 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 10.080 | | | $ | 10.040 | | | $ | 10.100 | | | $ | 10.030 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.185 | | | $ | 0.357 | | | $ | 0.360 | | | $ | 0.368 | | | $ | 0.375 | | | $ | 0.402 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.679 | ) | | | (0.388 | ) | | | (0.233 | ) | | | 0.032 | | | | (0.061 | ) | | | 0.062 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.494 | ) | | $ | (0.031 | ) | | $ | 0.127 | | | $ | 0.400 | | | $ | 0.314 | | | $ | 0.464 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.176 | ) | | $ | (0.349 | ) | | $ | (0.357 | ) | | $ | (0.360 | ) | | $ | (0.374 | ) | | $ | (0.394 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.176 | ) | | $ | (0.349 | ) | | $ | (0.357 | ) | | $ | (0.360 | ) | | $ | (0.374 | ) | | $ | (0.394 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.800 | | | $ | 9.470 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 10.080 | | | $ | 10.040 | | | $ | 10.100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (5.13 | )%(9) | | | (0.33 | )% | | | 1.23 | % | | | 4.09 | % | | | 3.32 | %(3) | | | 4.69 | % | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 5,479 | | | $ | 6,719 | | | $ | 8,683 | | | $ | 12,145 | | | $ | 15,344 | | | $ | 18,098 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.56 | %(4) | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.52 | %(5) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.16 | %(4) | | | 0.29 | % | | | 0.58 | % | | | 0.38 | % | | | 0.16 | %(6) | | | 0.19 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.72 | %(4) | | | 1.82 | % | | | 2.10 | %(5) | | | 1.90 | % | | | 1.70 | %(6) | | | 1.73 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.55 | %(4) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.49 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.38 | %(4) | | | 3.66 | % | | | 3.57 | % | | | 3.69 | % | | | 3.73 | % | | | 3.93 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 34 | %(9) | | | 23 | % | | | 9 | % | | | 18 | % | | | 8 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.16% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements107
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | North Carolina Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.470 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 10.070 | | | $ | 9.910 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.185 | | | $ | 0.355 | | | $ | 0.357 | | | $ | 0.097 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.679 | ) | | | (0.386 | ) | | | (0.220 | ) | | | 0.183(3 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.494 | ) | | $ | (0.031 | ) | | $ | 0.137 | | | $ | 0.280 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.176 | ) | | $ | (0.349 | ) | | $ | (0.357 | ) | | $ | (0.120 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.176 | ) | | $ | (0.349 | ) | | $ | (0.357 | ) | | $ | (0.120 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.800 | | | $ | 9.470 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 10.070 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | (5.13 | )%(9) | | | (0.33 | )% | | | 1.34 | % | | | 2.85 | %(9) | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 8,210 | | | $ | 8,073 | | | $ | 4,880 | | | $ | 527 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.56 | %(5) | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.52 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.16 | %(5) | | | 0.29 | % | | | 0.58 | % | | | 0.38 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.72 | %(5) | | | 1.82 | % | | | 2.09 | %(6) | | | 1.90 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.55 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.48 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.38 | %(5) | | | 3.65 | % | | | 3.56 | % | | | 2.91 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 34 | %(9) | | | 23 | % | | | 9 | % | | | 18 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, May 2, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements108
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | North Carolina Fund — Class I |
| | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.820 | | | $ | 8.550 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.209 | | | $ | 0.216 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.625 | ) | | | 0.259 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.416 | ) | | $ | 0.475 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.204 | ) | | $ | (0.205 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.204 | ) | | $ | (0.205 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.200 | | | $ | 8.820 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (4.60 | )%(7) | | | 5.56 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 8,320 | | | $ | 950 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.61 | %(4) | | | 0.58 | %(4) | | |
Interest and fee expense(5) | | | 0.16 | %(4) | | | 0.29 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.77 | %(4) | | | 0.87 | %(4) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.61 | %(4) | | | 0.54 | %(4) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.36 | %(4) | | | 4.86 | %(4) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 34 | %(7) | | | 23 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(6) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2008. |
|
(7) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements109
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Oregon Fund — Class A |
| | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.720 | | | $ | 9.260 | | | $ | 9.550 | | | $ | 9.460 | | | $ | 9.480 | | | $ | 9.420 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.197 | | | $ | 0.410 | | | $ | 0.411 | | | $ | 0.443 | | | $ | 0.470 | | | $ | 0.497 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.853 | ) | | | (0.533 | ) | | | (0.278 | ) | | | 0.089 | | | | (0.015 | ) | | | 0.062 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.656 | ) | | $ | (0.123 | ) | | $ | 0.133 | | | $ | 0.532 | | | $ | 0.455 | | | $ | 0.559 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.204 | ) | | $ | (0.417 | ) | | $ | (0.423 | ) | | $ | (0.442 | ) | | $ | (0.475 | ) | | $ | (0.499 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.204 | ) | | $ | (0.417 | ) | | $ | (0.423 | ) | | $ | (0.442 | ) | | $ | (0.475 | ) | | $ | (0.499 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 7.860 | | | $ | 8.720 | | | $ | 9.260 | | | $ | 9.550 | | | $ | 9.460 | | | $ | 9.480 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (7.42 | )%(8) | | | (1.36 | )% | | | 1.34 | % | | | 5.78 | % | | | 4.91 | % | | | 5.98 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 105,498 | | | $ | 124,199 | | | $ | 110,060 | | | $ | 73,764 | | | $ | 66,240 | | | $ | 55,604 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.82 | %(3) | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.78 | %(4) | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.80 | %(5) | | | 0.81 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.20 | %(3) | | | 0.22 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.46 | % | | | 0.26 | %(5) | | | 0.13 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.02 | %(3) | | | 0.98 | % | | | 1.25 | %(4) | | | 1.23 | % | | | 1.06 | %(5) | | | 0.94 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.81 | %(3) | | | 0.74 | % | | | 0.75 | %(4) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | | 0.80 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.18 | %(3) | | | 4.53 | % | | | 4.31 | % | | | 4.69 | % | | | 4.96 | % | | | 5.19 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 23 | %(8) | | | 34 | % | | | 42 | % | | | 15 | % | | | 27 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements110
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Oregon Fund — Class B |
| | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.540 | | | $ | 10.120 | | | $ | 10.440 | | | $ | 10.340 | | | $ | 10.370 | | | $ | 10.300 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.184 | | | $ | 0.375 | | | $ | 0.376 | | | $ | 0.408 | | | $ | 0.438 | | | $ | 0.470 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.936 | ) | | | (0.577 | ) | | | (0.312 | ) | | | 0.097 | | | | (0.026 | ) | | | 0.068 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.752 | ) | | $ | (0.202 | ) | | $ | 0.064 | | | $ | 0.505 | | | $ | 0.412 | | | $ | 0.538 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.384 | ) | | $ | (0.405 | ) | | $ | (0.442 | ) | | $ | (0.468 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.384 | ) | | $ | (0.405 | ) | | $ | (0.442 | ) | | $ | (0.468 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.600 | | | $ | 9.540 | | | $ | 10.120 | | | $ | 10.440 | | | $ | 10.340 | | | $ | 10.370 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (7.79 | )%(9) | | | (2.04 | )% | | | 0.56 | % | | | 5.00 | % | | | 4.24 | %(3) | | | 5.26 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 12,208 | | | $ | 14,432 | | | $ | 17,077 | | | $ | 21,015 | | | $ | 22,363 | | | $ | 24,787 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.57 | %(4) | | | 1.51 | % | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.55 | %(6) | | | 1.56 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.20 | %(4) | | | 0.22 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.46 | % | | | 0.26 | %(6) | | | 0.13 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.77 | %(4) | | | 1.73 | % | | | 2.00 | %(5) | | | 1.98 | % | | | 1.81 | %(6) | | | 1.69 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.56 | %(4) | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | | 1.55 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.43 | %(4) | | | 3.77 | % | | | 3.60 | % | | | 3.96 | % | | | 4.24 | % | | | 4.45 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 23 | %(4) | | | 34 | % | | | 42 | % | | | 15 | % | | | 27 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.18% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements111
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Oregon Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.550 | | | $ | 10.130 | | | $ | 10.440 | | | $ | 10.400 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.184 | | | $ | 0.373 | | | $ | 0.368 | | | $ | 0.172 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.935 | ) | | | (0.575 | ) | | | (0.294 | ) | | | 0.061 | (3) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.751 | ) | | $ | (0.202 | ) | | $ | 0.074 | | | $ | 0.233 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.189 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.384 | ) | | $ | (0.193 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.189 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.384 | ) | | $ | (0.193 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.610 | | | $ | 9.550 | | | $ | 10.130 | | | $ | 10.440 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | (7.78 | )%(9) | | | (2.03 | )% | | | 0.66 | % | | | 2.27 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 16,398 | | | $ | 16,927 | | | $ | 8,362 | | | $ | 666 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.57 | %(5) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.53 | %(6) | | | 1.52 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.20 | %(5) | | | 0.22 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.46 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.77 | %(5) | | | 1.74 | % | | | 2.00 | %(6) | | | 1.98 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.57 | %(5) | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.43 | %(5) | | | 3.78 | % | | | 3.54 | % | | | 3.32 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 23 | %(9) | | | 34 | % | | | 42 | % | | | 15 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 2, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements112
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | South Carolina Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.100 | | | $ | 9.700 | | | $ | 10.050 | | | $ | 10.060 | | | $ | 9.710 | | | $ | 9.450 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.202 | | | $ | 0.420 | | | $ | 0.409 | | | $ | 0.423 | | | $ | 0.463 | | | $ | 0.508 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.854 | ) | | | (0.598 | ) | | | (0.346 | ) | | | (0.002 | ) | | | 0.370 | | | | 0.265 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.652 | ) | | $ | (0.178 | ) | | $ | 0.063 | | | $ | 0.421 | | | $ | 0.833 | | | $ | 0.773 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.208 | ) | | $ | (0.422 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.431 | ) | | $ | (0.483 | ) | | $ | (0.513 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.208 | ) | | $ | (0.422 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.431 | ) | | $ | (0.483 | ) | | $ | (0.513 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.240 | | | $ | 9.100 | | | $ | 9.700 | | | $ | 10.050 | | | $ | 10.060 | | | $ | 9.710 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (7.16 | )%(8) | | | (1.75 | )% | | | 0.55 | % | | | 4.35 | % | | | 8.78 | % | | | 8.32 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 95,682 | | | $ | 110,470 | | | $ | 103,975 | | | $ | 71,412 | | | $ | 50,593 | | | $ | 34,601 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.79 | %(3) | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.76 | %(4) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.75 | %(5) | | | 0.75 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.19 | %(3) | | | 0.22 | % | | | 0.45 | % | | | 0.37 | % | | | 0.37 | %(5) | | | 0.23 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.98 | %(3) | | | 0.99 | % | | | 1.21 | %(4) | | | 1.12 | % | | | 1.12 | %(5) | | | 0.98 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.79 | %(3) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.73 | %(4) | | | 0.73 | % | | | 0.72 | %(5) | | | 0.75 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.08 | %(3) | | | 4.44 | % | | | 4.06 | % | | | 4.28 | % | | | 4.69 | % | | | 5.22 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 40 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 30 | %(8) | | | 47 | % | | | 33 | % | | | 42 | % | | | 29 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements113
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | South Carolina Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.650 | | | $ | 10.280 | | | $ | 10.660 | | | $ | 10.670 | | | $ | 10.300 | | | $ | 10.020 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.182 | | | $ | 0.371 | | | $ | 0.356 | | | $ | 0.372 | | | $ | 0.417 | | | $ | 0.465 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.906 | ) | | | (0.631 | ) | | | (0.378 | ) | | | (0.005 | ) | | | 0.387 | | | | 0.283 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.724 | ) | | $ | (0.260 | ) | | $ | (0.022 | ) | | $ | 0.367 | | | $ | 0.804 | | | $ | 0.748 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.186 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.358 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.468 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.186 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.358 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.468 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.740 | | | $ | 9.650 | | | $ | 10.280 | | | $ | 10.660 | | | $ | 10.670 | | | $ | 10.300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (7.42 | )%(9) | | | (2.56 | )% | | | (0.29 | )% | | | 3.57 | % | | | 8.16 | %(3) | | | 7.58 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 9,593 | | | $ | 11,316 | | | $ | 14,559 | | | $ | 17,667 | | | $ | 18,039 | | | $ | 18,529 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.55 | %(4) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.51 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.19 | %(4) | | | 0.22 | % | | | 0.45 | % | | | 0.37 | % | | | 0.37 | %(6) | | | 0.23 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.74 | %(4) | | | 1.74 | % | | | 1.96 | %(5) | | | 1.87 | % | | | 1.87 | %(6) | | | 1.73 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.55 | %(4) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.48 | %(5) | | | 1.48 | % | | | 1.47 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.32 | %(4) | | | 3.69 | % | | | 3.33 | % | | | 3.55 | % | | | 3.98 | % | | | 4.50 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 40 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 30 | %(9) | | | 47 | % | | | 33 | % | | | 42 | % | | | 29 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.18% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements114
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | South Carolina Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.660 | | | $ | 10.280 | | | $ | 10.660 | | | $ | 10.470 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.182 | | | $ | 0.369 | | | $ | 0.349 | | | $ | 0.218 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.916 | ) | | | (0.619 | ) | | | (0.371 | ) | | | 0.199 | (3) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.734 | ) | | $ | (0.250 | ) | | $ | (0.022 | ) | | $ | 0.417 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.186 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.358 | ) | | $ | (0.227 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.186 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.358 | ) | | $ | (0.227 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.740 | | | $ | 9.660 | | | $ | 10.280 | | | $ | 10.660 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | (7.51 | )%(9) | | | (2.46 | )% | | | (0.29 | )% | | | 4.04 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 18,815 | | | $ | 20,867 | | | $ | 13,623 | | | $ | 2,272 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.55 | %(5) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.19 | %(5) | | | 0.22 | % | | | 0.45 | % | | | 0.37 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.74 | %(5) | | | 1.74 | % | | | 1.96 | %(6) | | | 1.87 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.55 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.48 | %(6) | | | 1.48 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.33 | %(5) | | | 3.69 | % | | | 3.29 | % | | | 3.27 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 30 | %(9) | | | 47 | % | | | 33 | % | | | 42 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, January 12, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements115
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | South Carolina Fund — Class I |
| | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.110 | | | $ | 8.620 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.210 | | | $ | 0.215 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.853 | ) | | | 0.496 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.643 | ) | | $ | 0.711 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.217 | ) | | $ | (0.221 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.217 | ) | | $ | (0.221 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.250 | | | $ | 9.110 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (6.95 | )%(7) | | | 8.26 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 18,244 | | | $ | 22,826 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.60 | %(4) | | | 0.55 | %(4) | | |
Interest and fee expense(5) | | | 0.19 | %(4) | | | 0.22 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.79 | %(4) | | | 0.77 | %(4) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.59 | %(4) | | | 0.54 | %(4) | �� | |
Net investment income | | | 5.28 | %(4) | | | 4.68 | %(4) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 30 | %(7) | | | 47 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(6) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2008. |
|
(7) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements116
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Tennessee Fund — Class A |
| | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.100 | | | $ | 9.530 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 9.880 | | | $ | 9.990 | | | $ | 9.790 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.200 | | | $ | 0.409 | | | $ | 0.407 | | | $ | 0.419 | | | $ | 0.431 | | | $ | 0.462 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.966 | ) | | | (0.433 | ) | | | (0.318 | ) | | | (0.028 | ) | | | (0.001 | ) | | | 0.133 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.766 | ) | | $ | (0.024 | ) | | $ | 0.089 | | | $ | 0.391 | | | $ | 0.430 | | | $ | 0.595 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.204 | ) | | $ | (0.406 | ) | | $ | (0.409 | ) | | $ | (0.421 | ) | | $ | (0.450 | ) | | $ | (0.485 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.204 | ) | | $ | (0.406 | ) | | $ | (0.409 | ) | | $ | (0.421 | ) | | $ | (0.450 | ) | | $ | (0.485 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.130 | | | $ | 9.100 | | | $ | 9.530 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 9.880 | | | $ | 9.900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (8.35 | )%(8) | | | (0.26 | )% | | | 0.85 | % | | | 4.09 | % | | | 4.44 | % | | | 6.17 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 41,857 | | | $ | 49,219 | | | $ | 49,444 | | | $ | 46,023 | | | $ | 42,088 | | | $ | 39,285 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.79 | %(3) | | | 0.74 | % | | | 0.75 | %(4) | | | 0.73 | % | | | 0.76 | %(5) | | | 0.74 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.04 | %(3) | | | 0.09 | % | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.19 | % | | | 0.16 | %(5) | | | 0.08 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.83 | %(3) | | | 0.83 | % | | | 0.96 | %(4) | | | 0.92 | % | | | 0.92 | %(5) | | | 0.82 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.77 | %(3) | | | 0.72 | % | | | 0.72 | %(4) | | | 0.70 | % | | | 0.75 | %(5) | | | 0.73 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.03 | %(3) | | | 4.35 | % | | | 4.15 | % | | | 4.30 | % | | | 4.36 | % | | | 4.69 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 9 | %(8) | | | 26 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 16 | % | | | 13 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements117
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Tennessee Fund — Class B |
| | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 10.380 | | | $ | 10.730 | | | $ | 10.750 | | | $ | 10.780 | | | $ | 10.660 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.190 | | | $ | 0.369 | | | $ | 0.365 | | | $ | 0.378 | | | $ | 0.390 | | | $ | 0.429 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (1.054 | ) | | | (0.475 | ) | | | (0.350 | ) | | | (0.020 | ) | | | (0.010 | ) | | | 0.137 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.864 | ) | | $ | (0.106 | ) | | $ | 0.015 | | | $ | 0.358 | | | $ | 0.380 | | | $ | 0.566 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.186 | ) | | $ | (0.364 | ) | | $ | (0.365 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.410 | ) | | $ | (0.446 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.186 | ) | | $ | (0.364 | ) | | $ | (0.365 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.410 | ) | | $ | (0.446 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.860 | | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 10.380 | | | $ | 10.730 | | | $ | 10.750 | | | $ | 10.780 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (8.66 | )%(9) | | | (1.05 | )% | | | 0.09 | % | | | 3.43 | % | | | 3.75 | %(3) | | | 5.39 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 4,431 | | | $ | 5,247 | | | $ | 6,215 | | | $ | 8,638 | | | $ | 10,346 | | | $ | 11,924 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.54 | %(4) | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | | 1.48 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.49 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.04 | %(4) | | | 0.09 | % | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.19 | % | | | 0.16 | %(6) | | | 0.08 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.58 | %(4) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.71 | %(5) | | | 1.67 | % | | | 1.67 | %(6) | | | 1.57 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.52 | %(4) | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.47 | %(5) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.48 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.29 | %(4) | | | 3.60 | % | | | 3.41 | % | | | 3.56 | % | | | 3.63 | % | | | 3.95 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 9 | %(9) | | | 26 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 16 | % | | | 13 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.16% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements118
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Tennessee Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 10.370 | | | $ | 10.720 | | | $ | 10.580 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.190 | | | $ | 0.366 | | | $ | 0.362 | | | $ | 0.110 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (1.054 | ) | | | (0.463 | ) | | | (0.347 | ) | | | 0.156 | (3) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.864 | ) | | $ | (0.097 | ) | | $ | 0.015 | | | $ | 0.266 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.186 | ) | | $ | (0.363 | ) | | $ | (0.365 | ) | | $ | (0.126 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.186 | ) | | $ | (0.363 | ) | | $ | (0.365 | ) | | $ | (0.126 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.860 | | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 10.370 | | | $ | 10.720 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | (8.76 | )%(9) | | | (0.95 | )% | | | 0.09 | % | | | 2.54 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 4,930 | | | $ | 4,078 | | | $ | 2,683 | | | $ | 559 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.54 | %(5) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.49 | %(6) | | | 1.48 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.04 | %(5) | | | 0.09 | % | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.19 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.58 | %(5) | | | 1.59 | % | | | 1.70 | %(6) | | | 1.67 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.46 | %(6) | | | 1.45 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.27 | %(5) | | | 3.59 | % | | | 3.40 | % | | | 3.10 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 9 | %(9) | | | 26 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 16 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, May 2, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements119
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Virginia Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.690 | | | $ | 9.280 | | | $ | 9.770 | | | $ | 9.790 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.390 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.196 | | | $ | 0.412 | | | $ | 0.403 | | | $ | 0.418 | | | $ | 0.426 | | | $ | 0.451 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (1.051 | ) | | | (0.592 | ) | | | (0.485 | ) | | | (0.025 | ) | | | 0.202 | | | | 0.202 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.855 | ) | | $ | (0.180 | ) | | $ | (0.082 | ) | | $ | 0.393 | | | $ | 0.628 | | | $ | 0.653 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.205 | ) | | $ | (0.410 | ) | | $ | (0.408 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.428 | ) | | $ | (0.453 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.205 | ) | | $ | (0.410 | ) | | $ | (0.408 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.428 | ) | | $ | (0.453 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 7.630 | | | $ | 8.690 | | | $ | 9.280 | | | $ | 9.770 | | | $ | 9.790 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (9.73 | )%(8) | | | (2.00 | )% | | | (0.95 | )% | | | 4.16 | % | | | 6.70 | % | | | 7.06 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 93,437 | | | $ | 107,673 | | | $ | 107,632 | | | $ | 89,098 | | | $ | 78,848 | | | $ | 73,924 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.81 | %(3) | | | 0.78 | % | | | 0.78 | %(4) | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.80 | %(5) | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.21 | %(3) | | | 0.37 | % | | | 0.57 | % | | | 0.54 | % | | | 0.23 | %(5) | | | 0.12 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.02 | %(3) | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.35 | %(4) | | | 1.31 | % | | | 1.03 | %(5) | | | 0.91 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.79 | %(3) | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.76 | %(4) | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | | 0.79 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.28 | %(3) | | | 4.53 | % | | | 4.14 | % | | | 4.34 | % | | | 4.41 | % | | | 4.75 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 21 | %(8) | | | 26 | % | | | 28 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 47 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements120
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Virginia Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.620 | | | $ | 10.270 | | | $ | 10.820 | | | $ | 10.830 | | | $ | 10.610 | | | $ | 10.400 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.186 | | | $ | 0.381 | | | $ | 0.367 | | | $ | 0.384 | | | $ | 0.392 | | | $ | 0.426 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (1.162 | ) | | | (0.656 | ) | | | (0.547 | ) | | | (0.018 | ) | | | 0.222 | | | | 0.204 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.976 | ) | | $ | (0.275 | ) | | $ | (0.180 | ) | | $ | 0.366 | | | $ | 0.614 | | | $ | 0.630 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.194 | ) | | $ | (0.375 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.376 | ) | | $ | (0.394 | ) | | $ | (0.420 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.194 | ) | | $ | (0.375 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.376 | ) | | $ | (0.394 | ) | | $ | (0.420 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.450 | | | $ | 9.620 | | | $ | 10.270 | | | $ | 10.820 | | | $ | 10.830 | | | $ | 10.610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (10.06 | )%(9) | | | (2.73 | )% | | | (1.77 | )% | | | 3.49 | % | | | 6.06 | %(3) | | | 6.15 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 10,724 | | | $ | 14,451 | | | $ | 19,055 | | | $ | 24,411 | | | $ | 29,456 | | | $ | 32,477 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.56 | %(4) | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.55 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.21 | %(4) | | | 0.37 | % | | | 0.57 | % | | | 0.54 | % | | | 0.23 | %(6) | | | 0.12 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.77 | %(4) | | | 1.90 | % | | | 2.10 | %(5) | | | 2.06 | % | | | 1.78 | %(6) | | | 1.66 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.55 | %(4) | | | 1.51 | % | | | 1.51 | %(5) | | | 1.51 | % | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.53 | %(4) | | | 3.78 | % | | | 3.40 | % | | | 3.61 | % | | | 3.67 | % | | | 4.00 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | 21 | %(9) | | | 26 | % | | | 28 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 47 | % | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.16% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | Portfolio turnover represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements121
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Virginia Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended August 31, | | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | August 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.630 | | | $ | 10.280 | | | $ | 10.810 | | | $ | 10.660 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.185 | | | $ | 0.381 | | | $ | 0.365 | | | $ | 0.198 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (1.161 | ) | | | (0.656 | ) | | | (0.525 | ) | | | 0.158 | (3) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.976 | ) | | $ | (0.275 | ) | | $ | (0.160 | ) | | $ | 0.356 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.194 | ) | | $ | (0.375 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.206 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.194 | ) | | $ | (0.375 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | $ | (0.206 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.460 | | | $ | 9.630 | | | $ | 10.280 | | | $ | 10.810 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | (10.05 | )%(9) | | | (2.73 | )% | | | (1.58 | )% | | | 3.38 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 9,660 | | | $ | 9,451 | | | $ | 5,236 | | | $ | 548 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.56 | %(5) | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.53 | %(6) | | | 1.52 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.21 | %(5) | | | 0.37 | % | | | 0.57 | % | | | 0.54 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.77 | %(5) | | | 1.90 | % | | | 2.10 | %(6) | | | 2.06 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.54 | %(5) | | | 1.51 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.51 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.53 | %(5) | | | 3.80 | % | | | 3.40 | % | | | 3.31 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 21 | %(9) | | | 26 | % | | | 28 | % | | | 30 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, February 8, 2006, to August 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended August 31, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements122
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Virginia Fund — Class I |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.710 | | | $ | 8.440 | | | |
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.198 | | | $ | 0.222 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (1.044 | ) | | | 0.263 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.846 | ) | | $ | 0.485 | | | |
|
|
|
Less distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.214 | ) | | $ | (0.215 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.214 | ) | | $ | (0.215 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 7.650 | | | $ | 8.710 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (9.60 | )%(7) | | | 5.73 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 10,384 | | | $ | 1,338 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.61 | %(4) | | | 0.63 | %(4) | | |
Interest and fee expense(5) | | | 0.21 | %(4) | | | 0.37 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.82 | %(4) | | | 1.00 | %(4) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.60 | %(4) | | | 0.56 | %(4) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.44 | %(4) | | | 5.07 | %(4) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 21 | %(7) | | | 26 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to August 31, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(6) | | For the Fund’s year ended August 31, 2008. |
|
(7) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements123
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Municipals Trust (the Trust) is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust presently consists of twenty-seven funds, twelve of which, each non-diversified, are included in these financial statements. They include Eaton Vance Alabama Municipals Fund (Alabama Fund), Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Fund (Arkansas Fund), Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund (Georgia Fund), Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund (Kentucky Fund), Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund (Louisiana Fund), Eaton Vance Maryland Municipals Fund (Maryland Fund), Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund (Missouri Fund), Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund (North Carolina Fund), Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund (Oregon Fund), Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund (South Carolina Fund), Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund (Tennessee Fund) and Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund (Virginia Fund), (each individually referred to as the Fund, and collectively, the Funds). The Funds seek to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax and from particular state or local income or other taxes. The Arkansas Fund, Kentucky Fund, Louisiana Fund, Missouri Fund, Oregon Fund and Tennessee Fund offer three classes of shares. The Alabama Fund, Georgia Fund, Maryland Fund, North Carolina Fund, South Carolina Fund and Virginia Fund offer four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares of each Fund automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in each Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Funds. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment Valuation — Municipal bonds and taxable obligations, if any, are generally valued on the basis of valuations furnished by a pricing vendor, as derived from such vendor’s pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer. The pricing vendor may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Financial futures contracts and options on financial futures contracts listed on commodity exchanges are valued based on the closing price on the primary exchange on which such contracts trade. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a pricing vendor. Such vendor valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value using swap curves provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Short-term obligations, maturing in sixty days or less, are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available, and investments for which the price of a security is not believed to represent its fair market value, are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.
B Investment Transactions and Related Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal Taxes — Each Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. Each Fund intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by each Fund, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.
At August 31, 2008, the following Funds, for federal income tax purposes, had capital loss carryforwards which will reduce the respective Fund’s taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to
124
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
relieve the Funds of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The amounts and expiration dates of the capital loss carryforwards are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fund | | Amount | | | Expiration Date | | | |
|
Alabama | | $ | 143,185 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
Arkansas | | | 661,011 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 126,693 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
Georgia | | | 129,324 | | | | August 31, 2011 | | | |
| | | 117,457 | | | | August 31, 2012 | | | |
| | | 931,893 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 536,265 | | | | August 31, 2015 | | | |
| | | 306,338 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
Kentucky | | | 2,260,947 | | | | August 31, 2012 | | | |
| | | 944,485 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 98,602 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
Louisiana | | | 159,254 | | | | August 31, 2009 | | | |
| | | 183,393 | | | | August 31, 2010 | | | |
| | | 142,162 | | | | August 31, 2012 | | | |
| | | 197,480 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 85,459 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
Maryland | | | 818,358 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 204,999 | | | | August 31, 2015 | | | |
| | | 4,209,063 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
Missouri | | | 69,474 | | | | August 31, 2010 | | | |
| | | 135,451 | | | | August 31, 2012 | | | |
| | | 831,764 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 337,671 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
North Carolina | | | 106,713 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 439,915 | | | | August 31, 2015 | | | |
| | | 274,170 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
Oregon | | | 1,258,470 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 2,145,240 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
South Carolina | | | 290,746 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 1,027,752 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
Tennessee | | | 398,146 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 238,529 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
Virginia | | | 174,008 | | | | August 31, 2012 | | | |
| | | 1,185,970 | | | | August 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | 502,088 | | | | August 31, 2016 | | | |
Additionally, at August 31, 2008, the Alabama Fund, Arkansas Fund, Georgia Fund, Kentucky Fund, Louisiana Fund, Missouri Fund, North Carolina Fund, Oregon Fund, South Carolina Fund, Tennessee Fund and Virginia Fund had net capital losses of $438,976, $1,041,621, $1,188,556, $290,128, $467,242, $1,572,798, $967,588, $2,477,877, $5,260,039, $1,025,024 and $3,899,475, respectively, attributable to security transactions incurred after October 31, 2007. These net capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the Funds’ taxable year ending August 31, 2009.
As of February 28, 2009, the Funds had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Funds’ federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended August 31, 2008 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Funds. Pursuant to the respective custodian agreements, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance each Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce each Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statements of Operations.
F Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, each Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. Each Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against each Fund that have not yet occurred.
125
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
I Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held — The Funds may invest in inverse floating rate securities, also referred to as tender option bonds (TOBs), whereby a Fund may sell a fixed rate bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Fund buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), set up by the broker, often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation (Inverse Floater). The broker deposits a fixed rate bond into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the fixed rate bond sold to the broker by the Fund, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the fixed rate bond purchased from the Fund (the Fixed Rate Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The Inverse Floater held by a Fund gives the Fund the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV to the Fund, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Fund exercise such right, it would pay the broker the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the Inverse Floater for the underlying Fixed Rate Bond. Pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities” (FAS 140), the Funds account for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in their Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in their Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. Interest expense related to the Funds’ liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Fund, as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At February 28, 2009, the amounts of the Funds’ Floating Rate Notes and related interest rates and collateral were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Interest Rate
| | | | | | |
| | | | | or Range of
| | | Collateral for
| | | |
| | Floating Rate
| | | Interest Rates
| | | Floating Rate
| | | |
Fund | | Notes Outstanding | | | (%) | | | Notes Outstanding | | | |
|
Alabama | | $ | 1,305,000 | | | | 0.67 | | | $ | 1,613,076 | | | |
Arkansas | | | 865,000 | | | | 0.60 – 2.00 | | | | 1,589,771 | | | |
Georgia | | | 7,920,000 | | | | 0.60 – 2.00 | | | | 11,436,270 | | | |
Louisiana | | | 310,000 | | | | 2.00 | | | | 600,293 | | | |
Maryland | | | 3,375,000 | | | | 0.89–1.02 | | | | 4,075,472 | | | |
Missouri | | | 1,030,000 | | | | 2.00 | | | | 1,994,523 | | | |
North Carolina | | | 7,970,000 | | | | 0.60 – 2.00 | | | | 11,449,369 | | | |
Oregon | | | 6,900,000 | | | | 0.62 – 2.00 | | | | 9,777,667 | | | |
South Carolina | | | 3,350,000 | | | | 0.60 – 2.00 | | | | 5,656,750 | | | |
Tennessee | | | 280,000 | | | | 2.00 | | | | 542,200 | | | |
Virginia | | | 4,850,000 | | | | 0.72 – 2.00 | | | | 8,105,647 | | | |
The Funds may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with the broker by which a Fund agrees to reimburse the broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Funds’ exposure under shortfall and forbearance agreements that were entered into as of February 28, 2009 was approximately $5,025,000 and $4,000,000 for North Carolina Fund and Virginia Fund, respectively.
The Funds may also purchase Inverse Floaters from brokers in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying fixed rate bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to Inverse Floaters purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments. The Funds’ investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in Inverse Floaters. Inverse floating rate securities typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of inverse floating rate securities are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Funds’ investment policies do not allow the Funds to borrow money for purposes of making investments. Management believes that the Funds’ restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability in the Funds’ Statements of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Funds’ restrictions apply. Inverse Floaters held by the
126
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Funds are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
J Financial Futures Contracts — The Funds may enter into financial futures contracts. The Funds’ investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, a Fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Fund each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. In entering such contracts, the Fund bears the risk if the counterparties do not perform under the contracts’ terms.
K Interest Rate Swaps — The Funds may enter into interest rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to these agreements, a Fund makes periodic payments at a fixed interest rate and, in exchange, receives payments based on the interest rate of a benchmark industry index. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. A Fund is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.
L When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions — The Funds may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Funds maintain security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.
M Interim Financial Statements — The interim financial statements relating to February 28, 2009 and for the six months then ended have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of the Funds’ management, reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The net investment income of each Fund is determined daily and substantially all of the net investment income so determined is declared as a dividend to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Distributions are paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards, if any), are made at least annually. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of a Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Funds distinguish between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM), as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to each Fund. The fee is based upon a percentage of average daily net assets plus a percentage of gross income (i.e., income other than gains from the sale of securities) as presented in the following table and is payable monthly.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Annual
| | | Daily Income
| | | |
Daily Net Assets | | Asset Rate | | | Rate | | | |
|
Up to $20 million | | | 0.10 | % | | | 1.00 | % | | |
$20 million up to $40 million | | | 0.20 | % | | | 2.00 | % | | |
$40 million up to $500 million | | | 0.30 | % | | | 3.00 | % | | |
On average daily net assets of $500 million or more, the rates are further reduced. For the six months ended
127
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
February 28, 2009, investment adviser fees incurred by the Funds and the effective annual rates, as a percentage of average daily net assets, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investment
| | | Effective
| | | |
Fund | | Adviser Fee | | | Annual Rate | | | |
|
Alabama | | $ | 80,243 | | | | 0.30 | % | | |
Arkansas | | | 83,195 | | | | 0.30 | | | |
Georgia | | | 137,635 | | | | 0.36 | | | |
Kentucky | | | 73,586 | | | | 0.29 | | | |
Louisiana | | | 46,241 | | | | 0.24 | | | |
Maryland | | | 167,093 | | | | 0.38 | | | |
Missouri | | | 173,611 | | | | 0.37 | | | |
North Carolina | | | 172,711 | | | | 0.38 | | | |
Oregon | | | 266,770 | | | | 0.41 | | | |
South Carolina | | | 287,350 | | | | 0.41 | | | |
Tennessee | | | 73,744 | | | | 0.29 | | | |
Virginia | | | 228,782 | | | | 0.40 | | | |
EVM serves as administrator of each Fund, but receives no compensation. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of each Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Funds’ principal underwriter, received a portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the Funds. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5). Sub-transfer agent fees earned by EVM and Class A sales charges that the Funds were informed were received by EVD for the six months ended February 28, 2009 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | EVM’s
| | | | | | |
| | Sub-Transfer
| | | EVD’s Class A
| | | |
Fund | | Agent Fees | | | Sales Charges | | | |
|
Alabama | | $ | 640 | | | $ | 1,004 | | | |
Arkansas | | | 754 | | | | 5,735 | | | |
Georgia | | | 923 | | | | 2,118 | | | |
Kentucky | | | 767 | | | | 1,137 | | | |
Louisiana | | | 288 | | | | 1,718 | | | |
Maryland | | | 1,130 | | | | 4,689 | | | |
Missouri | | | 1,244 | | | | 6,640 | | | |
North Carolina | | | 1,312 | | | | 2,565 | | | |
Oregon | | | 1,481 | | | | 8,641 | | | |
South Carolina | | | 1,116 | | | | 9,013 | | | |
Tennessee | | | 674 | | | | 5,163 | | | |
Virginia | | | 1,675 | | | | 3,326 | | | |
Except for Trustees of the Funds who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Funds out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Funds who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the six months ended February 28, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Funds are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
Each Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that each Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to each Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Trustees approved distribution and service fee payments equal to 0.20% per annum of each Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the six months ended February 28, 2009 for Class A shares amounted to the following:
| | | | | | |
| | Class A
| | | |
| | Distribution and
| | | |
Fund | | Service Fees | | | |
|
Alabama | | $ | 42,279 | | | |
Arkansas | | | 48,804 | | | |
Georgia | | | 57,770 | | | |
Kentucky | | | 43,623 | | | |
Louisiana | | | 34,683 | | | |
Maryland | | | 69,777 | | | |
Missouri | | | 82,961 | | | |
North Carolina | | | 73,611 | | | |
Oregon | | | 103,132 | | | |
South Carolina | | | 93,253 | | | |
Tennessee | | | 42,044 | | | |
Virginia | | | 90,431 | | | |
Each Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require each Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the respective Funds. Each Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 5% and 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by each Fund for Class B and
128
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Class C shares sold, respectively, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the six months ended February 28, 2009, the Funds paid or accrued to EVD the following distribution fees, representing 0.75% (annualized) of the average daily net assets of each Fund’s Class B and Class C shares:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B
| | | Class C
| | | |
Fund | | Distribution Fees | | | Distribution Fees | | | |
|
Alabama | | $ | 27,563 | | | $ | 4,154 | | | |
Arkansas | | | 13,216 | | | | 10,149 | | | |
Georgia | | | 25,292 | | | | 25,661 | | | |
Kentucky | | | 20,029 | | | | 7,654 | | | |
Louisiana | | | 11,924 | | | | 1,708 | | | |
Maryland | | | 31,966 | | | | 34,731 | | | |
Missouri | | | 24,450 | | | | 18,604 | | | |
North Carolina | | | 21,451 | | | | 28,051 | | | |
Oregon | | | 45,752 | | | | 57,626 | | | |
South Carolina | | | 36,149 | | | | 67,825 | | | |
Tennessee | | | 16,868 | | | | 15,930 | | | |
Virginia | | | 42,877 | | | | 31,568 | | | |
At February 28, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fund | | Class B | | | Class C | | | |
|
Alabama | | $ | 1,165,000 | | | $ | 202,000 | | | |
Arkansas | | | 1,099,000 | | | | 248,000 | | | |
Georgia | | | 1,659,000 | | | | 565,000 | | | |
Kentucky | | | 1,166,000 | | | | 186,000 | | | |
Louisiana | | | 709,000 | | | | 41,000 | | | |
Maryland | | | 3,558,000 | | | | 831,000 | | | |
Missouri | | | 432,000 | | | | 343,000 | | | |
North Carolina | | | 1,675,000 | | | | 541,000 | | | |
Oregon | | | 1,614,000 | | | | 1,187,000 | | | |
South Carolina | | | 1,202,000 | | | | 1,596,000 | | | |
Tennessee | | | 672,000 | | | | 328,000 | | | |
Virginia | | | 972,000 | | | | 649,000 | | | |
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Funds to make payments of service fees to EVD, investment dealers and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of the average daily net assets attributable to that class. The Trustees approved service fee payments equal to 0.20% per annum of each Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the Class B and Class C sales commissions and distribution fees and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the six months ended February 28, 2009 amounted to the following:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B
| | | Class C
| | | |
Fund | | Service Fees | | | Service Fees | | | |
|
Alabama | | $ | 7,350 | | | $ | 1,108 | | | |
Arkansas | | | 3,524 | | | | 2,706 | | | |
Georgia | | | 6,744 | | | | 6,842 | | | |
Kentucky | | | 5,341 | | | | 2,041 | | | |
Louisiana | | | 3,180 | | | | 456 | | | |
Maryland | | | 8,524 | | | | 9,261 | | | |
Missouri | | | 6,520 | | | | 4,962 | | | |
North Carolina | | | 5,720 | | | | 7,480 | | | |
Oregon | | | 12,201 | | | | 15,367 | | | |
South Carolina | | | 9,639 | | | | 18,087 | | | |
Tennessee | | | 4,499 | | | | 4,248 | | | |
Virginia | | | 11,434 | | | | 8,418 | | | |
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within eighteen months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under each Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to each Fund. For the six months ended February 28, 2009, the Funds were informed that EVD
129
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
received approximately the following amounts of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fund | | Class A | | | Class B | | | Class C | | | |
|
Alabama | | $ | 26,000 | | | $ | 2,000 | | | $ | 100 | | | |
Arkansas | | | 4,000 | | | | 3,000 | | | | — | | | |
Georgia | | | — | | | | 5,000 | | | | 3,000 | | | |
Kentucky | | | — | | | | 3,000 | | | | 2,000 | | | |
Louisiana | | | — | | | | 1,000 | | | | 300 | | | |
Maryland | | | 8,000 | | | | 4,000 | | | | 2,000 | | | |
Missouri | | | — | | | | 3,000 | | | | 1,000 | | | |
North Carolina | | | 7,000 | | | | 2,000 | | | | 1,000 | | | |
Oregon | | | 10,000 | | | | 7,000 | | | | 5,000 | | | |
South Carolina | | | 9,000 | | | | 7,000 | | | | 5,000 | | | |
Tennessee | | | — | | | | 4,000 | | | | 100 | | | |
Virginia | | | 400 | | | | 12,000 | | | | 400 | | | |
6 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, for the six months ended February 28, 2009 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fund | | Purchases | | | Sales | | | |
|
Alabama | | $ | 4,503,632 | | | $ | 13,983,533 | | | |
Arkansas | | | 2,066,065 | | | | 6,748,613 | | | |
Georgia | | | 8,534,709 | | | | 19,338,796 | | | |
Kentucky | | | 5,341,134 | | | | 9,531,972 | | | |
Louisiana | | | 7,283,092 | | | | 10,910,396 | | | |
Maryland | | | 5,143,797 | | | | 13,016,388 | | | |
Missouri | | | 15,638,886 | | | | 19,917,608 | | | |
North Carolina | | | 33,645,326 | | | | 38,114,942 | | | |
Oregon | | | 34,168,228 | | | | 51,817,036 | | | |
South Carolina | | | 46,045,890 | | | | 65,190,208 | | | |
Tennessee | | | 4,574,382 | | | | 9,299,035 | | | |
Virginia | | | 26,361,053 | | | | 37,449,214 | | | |
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
Each Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Funds) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Alabama Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 166,186 | | | | 930,997 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 61,707 | | | | 120,214 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (1,095,032 | ) | | | (606,351 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 90,699 | | | | 136,161 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (776,440 | ) | | | 581,021 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 14,448 | | | | 37,789 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 9,330 | | | | 21,153 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (64,973 | ) | | | (106,024 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (82,395 | ) | | | (123,764 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (123,590 | ) | | | (170,846 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 54,664 | | | | 140,614 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 908 | | | | 2,698 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (11,514 | ) | | | (171,707 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 44,058 | | | | (28,395 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Period Ended | | | |
Class I | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 124,263 | | | | 461,344 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 87 | | | | — | | | |
Redemptions | | | (185,568 | ) | | | (37,636 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (61,218 | ) | | | 423,708 | | | |
|
|
130
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Arkansas Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 438,813 | | | | 1,127,584 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 103,755 | | | | 161,742 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (586,823 | ) | | | (1,079,249 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 21,407 | | | | 39,151 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (22,848 | ) | | | 249,228 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 17,376 | | | | 21,875 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 5,607 | | | | 9,640 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (25,838 | ) | | | (91,997 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (19,925 | ) | | | (36,425 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (22,780 | ) | | | (96,907 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 40,356 | | | | 141,385 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,988 | | | | 2,837 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (12,975 | ) | | | (105,011 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 29,369 | | | | 39,211 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Georgia Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 416,930 | | | | 1,869,016 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 102,420 | | | | 186,946 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (1,184,465 | ) | | | (1,831,383 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 86,105 | | | | 73,538 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (579,010 | ) | | | 298,117 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 14,689 | | | | 33,674 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 9,317 | | | | 20,257 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (71,184 | ) | | | (260,361 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (80,523 | ) | | | (68,789 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (127,701 | ) | | | (275,219 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 160,738 | | | | 503,542 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 10,782 | | | | 15,838 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (169,784 | ) | | | (342,937 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 1,736 | | | | 176,443 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Period Ended | | | |
Class I | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 368,870 | | | | 525,775 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (164,492 | ) | | | (2,513 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 204,378 | | | | 523,262 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Kentucky Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 146,123 | | | | 568,635 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 95,670 | | | | 165,480 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (658,851 | ) | | | (688,154 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 79,145 | | | | 88,435 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (337,913 | ) | | | 134,396 | | | |
|
|
131
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Kentucky Fund (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 6,342 | | | | 10,900 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 8,548 | | | | 17,226 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (47,083 | ) | | | (107,190 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (73,293 | ) | | | (81,912 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (105,486 | ) | | | (160,976 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 42,796 | | | | 122,417 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 3,298 | | | | 6,764 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (39,850 | ) | | | (99,796 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 6,244 | | | | 29,385 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Louisiana Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 191,135 | | | | 1,022,964 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 63,221 | | | | 96,232 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (704,412 | ) | | | (810,465 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 39,641 | | | | 20,706 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (410,415 | ) | | | 329,437 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,002 | | | | 22,106 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 3,129 | | | | 5,646 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (27,071 | ) | | | (46,241 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (37,504 | ) | | | (19,579 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (59,444 | ) | | | (38,068 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Period Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(2) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 71,278 | | | | 24,353 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 548 | | | | 324 | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 71,826 | | | | 24,677 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Maryland Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
|
Sales | | | 763,239 | | | | 2,817,072 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 156,629 | | | | 265,854 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (1,474,301 | ) | | | (2,135,304 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 55,403 | | | | 137,109 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (499,030 | ) | | | 1,084,731 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 63,317 | | | | 49,626 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 14,084 | | | | 26,825 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (134,771 | ) | | | (193,578 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (50,743 | ) | | | (125,662 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (108,113 | ) | | | (242,789 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 304,887 | | | | 554,486 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 14,045 | | | | 21,536 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (168,130 | ) | | | (248,718 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 150,802 | | | | 327,304 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Period Ended | | | |
Class I | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 23,612 | | | | 10,452 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (1,596 | ) | | | (941 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 22,016 | | | | 9,511 | | | |
|
|
132
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Missouri Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 557,145 | | | | 2,105,248 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 156,536 | | | | 265,329 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (892,400 | ) | | | (1,658,989 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 31,025 | | | | 90,127 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (147,694 | ) | | | 801,715 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 30,180 | | | | 80,757 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 7,264 | | | | 14,443 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (24,686 | ) | | | (192,279 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (28,100 | ) | | | (81,526 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (15,342 | ) | | | (178,605 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 83,651 | | | | 165,973 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 7,601 | | | | 11,632 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (88,343 | ) | | | (57,329 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 2,909 | | | | 120,276 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 766,145 | | | | 2,034,924 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 141,184 | | | | 239,219 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,037,378 | ) | | | (1,265,239 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 69,091 | | | | 74,868 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (1,060,958 | ) | | | 1,083,772 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 23,469 | | | | 53,095 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 7,016 | | | | 13,355 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (52,653 | ) | | | (168,583 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (64,309 | ) | | | (69,689 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (86,477 | ) | | | (171,822 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 210,503 | | | | 600,741 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 9,657 | | | | 14,875 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (139,317 | ) | | | (258,554 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 80,843 | | | | 357,062 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Period Ended | | | |
Class I | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,140,129 | | | | 149,925 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 15 | | | | — | | | |
Redemptions | | | (232,857 | ) | | | (42,216 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 907,287 | | | | 107,709 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Oregon Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,123,055 | | | | 3,784,514 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 254,079 | | | | 382,641 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,306,856 | ) | | | (2,036,019 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 113,631 | | | | 221,561 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (816,091 | ) | | | 2,352,697 | | | |
|
|
133
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 105,984 | | | | 185,787 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 21,711 | | | | 35,703 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (116,916 | ) | | | (193,133 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (103,765 | ) | | | (202,513 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (92,986 | ) | | | (174,156 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 362,374 | | | | 1,098,319 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 28,790 | | | | 31,501 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (258,865 | ) | | | (182,325 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 132,299 | | | | 947,495 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
South Carolina Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,797,689 | | | | 3,776,202 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 205,801 | | | | 331,834 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,579,234 | ) | | | (2,750,705 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 53,283 | | | | 53,815 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (522,461 | ) | | | 1,411,146 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 41,520 | | | | 122,627 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 16,557 | | | | 28,726 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (82,591 | ) | | | (344,240 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (50,248 | ) | | | (50,739 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (74,762 | ) | | | (243,626 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 432,804 | | | | 1,204,990 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 28,588 | | | | 41,816 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (470,532 | ) | | | (410,493 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (9,140 | ) | | | 836,313 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Period Ended | | | |
Class I | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 672,307 | | | | 2,634,294 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 240 | | | | 156 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (965,429 | ) | | | (129,028 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (292,882 | ) | | | 2,505,422 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tennessee Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 349,941 | | | | 853,413 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 86,057 | | | | 136,063 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (727,082 | ) | | | (806,227 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 29,514 | | | | 35,823 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (261,570 | ) | | | 219,072 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 33,317 | | | | 17,747 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 7,328 | | | | 13,085 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (42,877 | ) | | | (67,568 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (27,081 | ) | | | (32,877 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (29,313 | ) | | | (69,613 | ) | | |
|
|
134
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Tennessee Fund (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 190,799 | | | | 240,334 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 6,149 | | | | 6,322 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (51,897 | ) | | | (93,703 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 145,051 | | | | 152,953 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Virginia Fund |
|
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 955,955 | | | | 3,324,355 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 202,330 | | | | 341,074 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (1,401,013 | ) | | | (3,024,617 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 95,902 | | | | 147,481 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (146,826 | ) | | | 788,293 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 70,034 | | | | 185,654 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 21,943 | | | | 41,101 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (238,558 | ) | | | (447,099 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (86,676 | ) | | | (133,216 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (233,257 | ) | | | (353,560 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Year Ended | | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 239,314 | | | | 618,039 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 17,601 | | | | 22,889 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (96,481 | ) | | | (168,775 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 160,434 | | | | 472,153 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | February 28, 2009 | | | Period Ended | | | |
Class I | | (Unaudited) | | | August 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,259,613 | | | | 153,615 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (55,594 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 1,204,019 | | | | 153,615 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class I of the Alabama Fund, Georgia Fund, Maryland Fund, North Carolina Fund, South Carolina Fund and Virginia Fund commenced operations on March 3, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Class C of the Louisiana Fund commenced operations on December 4, 2007. |
8 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of each Fund at February 28, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Alabama Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 52,385,625 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 1,469,062 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (4,316,003 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (2,846,941 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Arkansas Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 60,482,021 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 1,232,412 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (6,644,889 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (5,412,477 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Georgia Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 79,018,508 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 1,731,581 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (6,801,482 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (5,069,901 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Kentucky Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 53,140,814 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 2,080,200 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (4,764,771 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (2,684,571 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
135
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | |
Louisiana Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 42,008,236 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 967,038 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (5,433,460 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (4,466,422 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Maryland Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 94,681,893 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 1,789,329 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (12,384,222 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (10,594,893 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Missouri Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 99,871,096 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 2,910,576 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (8,382,197 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (5,471,621 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
North Carolina Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 96,931,595 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 2,724,828 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (7,379,977 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (4,655,149 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Oregon Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 146,689,750 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 1,825,977 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (13,734,373 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (11,908,396 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
South Carolina Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 154,833,392 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 1,623,174 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (12,764,129 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (11,140,955 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Tennessee Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 53,573,838 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 2,163,628 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (5,996,804 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (3,833,176 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Virginia Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 130,206,007 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 3,500,611 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (14,952,835 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (11,452,224 | ) | | |
|
|
9 Line of Credit
The Funds participate with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Funds solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to each Fund based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. At February 28, 2009, the Louisiana Fund had a balance outstanding pursuant to this line of credit of $500,000, at an interest rate of 0.845%. The Funds’ average borrowings or allocated fees during the six months ended February 28, 2009 were not significant.
10 Financial Instruments
The Funds may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of their investing activities. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts and interest rate swaps and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment a Fund has in particular classes of financial instruments and does not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
136
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at February 28, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | Expiration
| | | | | | Aggregate
| | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Fund | | Date | | Contracts | | Position | | Cost | | | Value | | | Appreciation | | | |
|
Alabama | | 6/09 | | 55 U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (7,019,182 | ) | | $ | (6,783,906 | ) | | $ | 235,276 | | | |
|
|
Arkansas | | 6/09 | | 128 U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (16,211,552 | ) | | $ | (15,788,000 | ) | | $ | 423,552 | | | |
|
|
Georgia | | 6/09 | | 185 U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (23,430,759 | ) | | $ | (22,818,594 | ) | | $ | 612,165 | | | |
|
|
Kentucky | | 6/09 | | 55 U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (6,965,901 | ) | | $ | (6,783,906 | ) | | $ | 181,995 | | | |
| | 6/09 | | 21 U.S. Treasury Note | | Short | | | (2,564,754 | ) | | | (2,520,656 | ) | | | 44,098 | | | |
|
|
Louisiana | | 6/09 | | 10 U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (1,266,528 | ) | | $ | (1,233,438 | ) | | $ | 33,090 | | | |
| | 6/09 | | 11 U.S. Treasury Note | | Short | | | (1,343,443 | ) | | | (1,320,344 | ) | | | 23,099 | | | |
|
|
Maryland | | 6/09 | | 106 U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (13,527,879 | ) | | $ | (13,074,437 | ) | | $ | 453,442 | | | |
|
|
Missouri | | 6/09 | | 93 U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (11,735,112 | ) | | $ | (11,470,969 | ) | | $ | 264,143 | | | |
|
|
Tennessee | | 6/09 | | 126 U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (15,958,247 | ) | | $ | (15,541,313 | ) | | $ | 416,934 | | | |
|
|
Virginia | | 6/09 | | 380 U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (48,128,045 | ) | | $ | (46,870,625 | ) | | $ | 1,257,420 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps |
Alabama Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | | | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | $ | 900,000 | | | 4.682% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | April 1, 2009/ April 1, 2039 | | $ | (201,246 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (201,246 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Arkansas Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | | | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 912,500 | | | 4.743% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | September 14, 2009/ September 14, 2039 | | $ | (202,521 | ) | | |
|
|
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | $ | 750,000 | | | 4.682% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | April 1, 2009/ April 1, 2039 | | $ | (167,705 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (370,226 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Georgia Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Appreciation
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 1,612,500 | | | 4.743% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | September 14, 2009/ September 14, 2039 | | $ | (357,880 | ) | | |
|
|
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | $ | 3,075,000 | | | 2.721% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | July 15, 2009/ July 15, 2039 | | $ | 444,068 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 86,188 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kentucky Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | | | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | $ | 1,150,000 | | | 4.682% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | April 1, 2009/ April 1, 2039 | | $ | (257,147 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (257,147 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Louisiana Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | | | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 837,500 | | | 4.743% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | September 14, 2009/ September 14, 2039 | | $ | (185,876 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (185,876 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maryland Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | | | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 1,837,500 | | | 4.743% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | September 14, 2009/ September 14, 2039 | | $ | (407,817 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (407,817 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Missouri Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | | | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 2,025,000 | | | 4.743% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | September 14, 2009/ September 14, 2039 | | $ | (449,430 | ) | | |
|
|
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | $ | 1,825,000 | | | 4.682% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | April 1, 2009/ April 1, 2039 | | $ | (408,082 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (857,512 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | | | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 1,462,500 | | | 4.743% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | September 14, 2009/ September 14, 2039 | | $ | (324,589 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (324,589 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
137
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Oregon Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | | | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 1,825,000 | | | 4.743% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | September 14, 2009/ September 14, 2039 | | $ | (405,042 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (405,042 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
South Carolina Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | | | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 1,100,000 | | | 4.743% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | September 14, 2009/ September 14, 2039 | | $ | (244,135 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (244,135 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tennessee Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Appreciation
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 1,150,000 | | | 4.743% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | September 14, 2009/ September 14, 2039 | | $ | (255,232 | ) | | |
|
|
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | $ | 2,300,000 | | | 2.721% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | July 15, 2009/ July 15, 2039 | | $ | 332,149 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 76,917 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Virginia Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | | | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Net Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 2,537,500 | | | 4.743% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | September 14, 2009/ September 14, 2039 | | $ | (563,175 | ) | | |
|
|
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | $ | 2,475,000 | | | 4.682% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | April 1, 2009/ April 1, 2039 | | $ | (553,426 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (1,116,601 | ) | | |
|
|
The effective date represents the date on which a Fund and the counterparty to the interest rate swap contract begin interest payment accruals.
At February 28, 2009, the Funds had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
11 Fair Value Measurements
The Funds adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, effective September 1, 2008. FAS 157 established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| |
• | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At February 28, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Funds’ investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alabama Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | 235,276 | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 50,843,684 | | | | (201,246 | ) | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 50,843,684 | | | $ | 34,030 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Arkansas Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | 423,552 | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 55,934,544 | | | | (370,226 | ) | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 55,934,544 | | | $ | 53,326 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Georgia Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | 612,165 | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 81,868,607 | | | | 86,188 | | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 81,868,607 | | | $ | 698,353 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kentucky Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | 226,093 | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 50,456,243 | | | | (257,147 | ) | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 50,456,243 | | | $ | (31,054 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
138
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds as of February 28, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Louisiana Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| �� | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | 56,189 | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 37,851,814 | | | | (185,876 | ) | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 37,851,814 | | | $ | (129,687 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maryland Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | 453,442 | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 87,462,000 | | | | (407,817 | ) | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 87,462,000 | | | $ | 45,625 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Missouri Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | 264,143 | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 95,429,475 | | | | (857,512 | ) | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 95,429,475 | | | $ | (593,369 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 100,246,446 | | | | (324,589 | ) | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 100,246,446 | | | $ | (324,589 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Oregon Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 141,681,354 | | | | (405,042 | ) | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 141,681,354 | | | $ | (405,042 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
South Carolina Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 147,042,437 | | | | (244,135 | ) | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 147,042,437 | | | $ | (244,135 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tennessee Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | 416,934 | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 50,020,662 | | | | 76,917 | | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 50,020,662 | | | $ | 493,851 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Virginia Fund |
| | | | Investments in
| | | Other Financial
| | | |
| | Valuation Inputs | | Securities | | | Instruments* | | | |
|
Level 1 | | Quoted Prices | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,257,420 | | | |
Level 2 | | Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | 123,603,783 | | | | (1,116,601 | ) | | |
Level 3 | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | $ | 123,603,783 | | | $ | 140,819 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Other financial instruments are futures and swap contracts not reflected in the Portfolio of Investments, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument. |
The Funds held no investments or other financial instruments as of August 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
12 Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. FAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. FAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FAS 161 will have on the Funds’ financial statement disclosures.
139
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited)
Eaton Vance Alabama Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 5,248,841 | | | | 44,513 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 5,248,841 | | | | 44,513 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 5,243,155 | | | | 50,199 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 5,248,841 | | | | 44,513 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 5,240,032 | | | | 53,321 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 5,248,841 | | | | 44,513 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 5,248,841 | | | | 44,513 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 5,248,841 | | | | 44,513 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 5,245,718 | | | | 47,635 | | | |
Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 4,599,106 | | | | 98,572 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 4,599,106 | | | | 98,572 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 4,599,106 | | | | 98,572 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 4,629,737 | | | | 67,942 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 4,599,106 | | | | 98,572 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 4,597,594 | | | | 100,084 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 4,597,594 | | | | 100,084 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 4,597,594 | | | | 100,084 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 4,629,737 | | | | 67,942 | | | |
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 8,330,353 | | | | 149,049 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 8,330,353 | | | | 149,049 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 8,315,723 | | | | 163,680 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 8,330,353 | | | | 149,049 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 8,325,911 | | | | 153,491 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 8,306,856 | | | | 172,546 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 8,311,298 | | | | 168,104 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 8,306,856 | | | | 172,546 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 8,325,929 | | | | 153,473 | | | |
140
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 5,556,362 | | | | 25,188 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 5,556,362 | | | | 25,188 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 5,553,585 | | | | 27,965 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 5,556,865 | | | | 24,684 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 5,554,086 | | | | 27,464 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 5,556,865 | | | | 24,684 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 5,556,364 | | | | 25,185 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 5,556,865 | | | | 24,684 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 5,553,582 | | | | 27,967 | | | |
Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 3,987,851 | | | | 1,110 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 3,987,851 | | | | 1,110 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 3,987,851 | | | | 1,110 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 3,987,851 | | | | 1,110 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 3,987,851 | | | | 1,110 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 3,987,851 | | | | 1,110 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 3,987,851 | | | | 1,110 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 3,987,851 | | | | 1,110 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 3,987,851 | | | | 1,110 | | | |
Eaton Vance Maryland Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 9,399,214 | | | | 114,263 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 9,399,214 | | | | 114,263 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 9,399,214 | | | | 114,263 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 9,399,214 | | | | 114,263 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 9,399,214 | | | | 114,263 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 9,389,935 | | | | 123,542 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 9,389,935 | | | | 123,542 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 9,389,935 | | | | 123,542 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 9,399,214 | | | | 114,263 | | | |
141
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 7,897,736 | | | | 92,064 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 7,897,736 | | | | 92,064 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 7,891,141 | | | | 98,659 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 7,897,736 | | | | 92,064 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 7,897,736 | | | | 92,064 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 7,891,141 | | | | 98,659 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 7,891,141 | | | | 98,659 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 7,897,736 | | | | 92,064 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 7,897,736 | | | | 92,064 | | | |
Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 9,462,332 | | | | 73,650 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 9,462,332 | | | | 73,650 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 9,462,332 | | | | 73,650 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 9,462,332 | | | | 73,650 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 9,459,060 | | | | 76,922 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 9,462,332 | | | | 73,650 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 9,462,332 | | | | 73,650 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 9,462,332 | | | | 73,650 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 9,462,332 | | | | 73,650 | | | |
Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 13,957,401 | | | | 207,034 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 13,957,401 | | | | 207,034 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 13,957,401 | | | | 207,034 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 13,957,401 | | | | 207,034 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 13,953,837 | | | | 210,598 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 13,957,401 | | | | 207,034 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 13,957,041 | | | | 207,034 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 13,957,401 | | | | 207,034 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 13,957,401 | | | | 207,034 | | | |
142
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 15,194,814 | | | | 225,616 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 15,196,863 | | | | 223,567 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 15,195,766 | | | | 224,664 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 15,196,863 | | | | 223,567 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 15,194,814 | | | | 225,616 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 15,171,969 | | | | 248,460 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 15,196,863 | | | | 223,567 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 15,194,814 | | | | 225,616 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 15,196,863 | | | | 223,567 | | | |
Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 5,269,268 | | | | 108,823 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 5,275,514 | | | | 102,578 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 5,265,356 | | | | 112,736 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 5,275,514 | | | | 102,578 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 5,265,356 | | | | 112,736 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 5,273,021 | | | | 105,071 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 5,270,524 | | | | 107,568 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 5,275,514 | | | | 102,578 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 5,265,356 | | | | 112,736 | | | |
Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on November 14, 2008 to elect Trustees. The results of the vote were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | |
Nominee for Trustee | | For | | | Withheld | | | |
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty | | | 12,341,892 | | | | 164,251 | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. | | | 12,345,149 | | | | 160,994 | | | |
Allen R. Freedman | | | 12,347,929 | | | | 158,214 | | | |
William H. Park | | | 12,345,149 | | | | 160,994 | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman | | | 12,345,450 | | | | 160,693 | | | |
Helen Frame Peters | | | 12,345,043 | | | | 161,100 | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger | | | 12,351,186 | | | | 154,957 | | | |
Lynn A. Stout | | | 12,345,149 | | | | 160,994 | | | |
Ralph F. Verni | | | 12,376,292 | | | | 129,851 | | | |
143
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 21, 2008, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2008. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
144
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2008, the Board met eleven times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee and the Governance Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met twelve, seven and five times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective. The Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee are newly established and did not meet during the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2008.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreements of the following funds:
| | |
| • | Eaton Vance Alabama Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Arkansas Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Georgia Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Kentucky Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Louisiana Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Maryland Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Missouri Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance North Carolina Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Oregon Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Tennessee Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Virginia Municipals Fund |
(the “Funds”), each with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Funds, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by each Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Funds, and recent changes in the identity of such personnel. In particular, the Board evaluated, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds. Specifically, the Board considered the Adviser’s large municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Funds. The
145
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to each Fund by senior management.
The Board reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Board also considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared each Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2007 for each Fund in operation over such periods. On the basis of the foregoing and other relevant information, the Board concluded that the performance of each Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by each Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered each Fund’s management fees and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2007, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for each Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded with respect to each Fund that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and each Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to each Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their relationship with the Funds.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability of each Fund, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and each Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of each Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of each Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and each Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of each Fund, the structure of each advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and each Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
146
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds
OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES
Eaton Vance Municipals Trust
| | |
Officers Robert B. MacIntosh President
William H. Ahern, Jr. Vice President
Craig R. Brandon Vice President
Cynthia J. Clemson Vice President
Thomas M. Metzold Vice President
Adam A. Weigold Vice President
Barbara E. Campbell Treasurer
Maureen A. Gemma Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
Paul M. O’Neil Chief Compliance Officer | | Trustees Ralph F. Verni Chairman
Benjamin C. Esty
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Allen R. Freedman
William H. Park
Ronald A. Pearlman
Helen Frame Peters
Heidi L. Steiger
Lynn A. Stout |
147
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
148
Investment Adviser
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Fund Administrator
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Principal Underwriter
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Eaton Vance Municipals Funds
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully a Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Funds’ current prospectus contains this and other information about the Funds and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 800-262-1122.
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling 1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrant’s Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp (specialty finance company). Previously, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (“UAM”) (a holding company owning institutional investment management firms).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not required in this filing
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed registrants
Not required in this filing.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not required in this filing.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
| | |
(a)(1) | | Registrant’s Code of Ethics – Not applicable (please see Item 2). |
|
(a)(2)(i) | | Treasurer’s Section 302 certification. |
|
(a)(2)(ii) | | President’s Section 302 certification. |
|
(b) | | Combined Section 906 certification. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Eaton Vance Municipals Trust
| | | | |
By: | | /s/ Robert B. MacIntosh Robert B. MacIntosh | | |
| | President | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | April 13, 2009 | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | |
By: | | /s/ Barbara E. Campbell Barbara E. Campbell | | |
| | Treasurer | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | April 13, 2009 | | |
| | | | |
By: | | /s/ Robert B. MacIntosh Robert B. MacIntosh President | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | April 13, 2009 | | |