Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2008
or
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-9183
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Wisconsin | 39-1382325 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3700 West Juneau Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin | 53208 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) (414) 342-4680
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer ¨ | |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Common Stock Outstanding as of July 25, 2008: 235,325,006 shares
Table of Contents
Form 10-Q Index
For the Quarter Ended June 29, 2008
Page | ||||
Part I | Financial Information | |||
Item 1. | Consolidated Financial Statements | |||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 15 | ||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 31 | ||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 31 | ||
Part II | Other Information | |||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 32 | ||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 32 | ||
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 32 | ||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 33 | ||
Item 6. | Exhibits | 33 | ||
Signature | 34 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Consolidated Financial Statements |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||||
Net revenue | $ | 1,572,569 | $ | 1,620,218 | $ | 2,878,882 | $ | 2,799,093 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 1,010,645 | 1,015,051 | 1,840,821 | 1,770,880 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 561,924 | 605,167 | 1,038,061 | 1,028,213 | ||||||||
Financial services income | 106,840 | 112,330 | 200,129 | 221,493 | ||||||||
Financial services expense | 69,693 | 47,121 | 128,075 | 97,347 | ||||||||
Operating income from financial services | 37,147 | 65,209 | 72,054 | 124,146 | ||||||||
Selling, administrative and engineering expense | 253,208 | 225,173 | 473,199 | 417,915 | ||||||||
Income from operations | 345,863 | 445,203 | 636,916 | 734,444 | ||||||||
Investment income, net | 2,240 | 5,164 | 4,282 | 14,079 | ||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 348,103 | 450,367 | 641,198 | 748,523 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 125,316 | 159,877 | 230,830 | 265,723 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 222,787 | $ | 290,490 | $ | 410,368 | $ | 482,800 | ||||
Earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.95 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.89 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.95 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.89 | ||||
Cash dividends per common share | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.46 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
(Unaudited) June 29, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | (Unaudited) July 1, 2007 | |||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||
Current assets: | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 803,400 | $ | 402,854 | $ | 416,084 | |||
Marketable securities | 524 | 2,475 | 307,347 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 290,139 | 181,217 | 163,369 | ||||||
Finance receivables held for sale | 1,617,817 | 781,280 | 381,927 | ||||||
Finance receivables held for investment, net | 1,246,325 | 1,575,283 | 1,318,025 | ||||||
Inventories | 341,396 | 349,697 | 344,969 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 206,624 | 174,508 | 122,342 | ||||||
Total current assets | 4,506,225 | 3,467,314 | 3,054,063 | ||||||
Finance receivables held for investment, net | 934,534 | 845,044 | 817,027 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 1,059,897 | 1,060,590 | 1,004,863 | ||||||
Prepaid pension costs | 77,809 | 89,881 | 47,714 | ||||||
Goodwill | 63,103 | 61,401 | 59,372 | ||||||
Other long-term assets | 142,185 | 132,376 | 138,555 | ||||||
$ | 6,783,753 | $ | 5,656,606 | $ | 5,121,594 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 322,449 | $ | 300,188 | $ | 414,031 | |||
Accrued liabilities | 518,814 | 484,936 | 458,252 | ||||||
Current portion of finance debt | 927,934 | 1,119,955 | 204,817 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 1,769,197 | 1,905,079 | 1,077,100 | ||||||
Finance debt | 2,050,000 | 980,000 | 975,000 | ||||||
Pension liability | 64,080 | 51,551 | 55,032 | ||||||
Postretirement healthcare benefits | 205,848 | 192,531 | 205,767 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 161,791 | 151,954 | 150,851 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) | |||||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 2,532,837 | 2,375,491 | 2,657,844 | ||||||
$ | 6,783,753 | $ | 5,656,606 | $ | 5,121,594 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||
Net cash (used by) provided by operating activities (Note 3) | $ | (39,016 | ) | $ | 1,062,455 | |||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (99,597 | ) | (86,016 | ) | ||||
Origination of finance receivables held for investment | (330,088 | ) | (272,784 | ) | ||||
Collections on finance receivables held for investment | 256,723 | 202,656 | ||||||
Collection of retained securitization interests | 18,607 | 43,241 | ||||||
Purchase of marketable securities | — | (317,270 | ) | |||||
Sales and redemptions of marketable securities | 2,019 | 669,747 | ||||||
Other, net | 1,193 | 3,582 | ||||||
Net cash (used by) provided by investing activities | (151,143 | ) | 243,156 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of medium-term notes | 993,550 | — | ||||||
Net decrease in finance-credit facilities and commercial paper | (116,621 | ) | (535,990 | ) | ||||
Dividends | (148,591 | ) | (116,650 | ) | ||||
Purchase of common stock for treasury | (150,134 | ) | (491,103 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments | 252 | 2,932 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock under employee stock option plans | 736 | 20,621 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used by) financing activities | 579,192 | (1,120,190 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 11,513 | (7,734 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 400,546 | 177,687 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||||||
At beginning of period | 402,854 | 238,397 | ||||||
At end of period | $ | 803,400 | $ | 416,084 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
The condensed interim consolidated financial statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q have been prepared by Harley-Davidson, Inc. (the “Company”) without audit. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. However, the foregoing statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of Company management, necessary to present fairly the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six month periods then ended and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six month periods then ended. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
2. New Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” SFAS No. 158 requires employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans to recognize previously unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service costs in the statement of financial position and to recognize future changes in these amounts in the year in which changes occur through comprehensive income. Additionally, employers are required to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of their year-end statements of financial position. The Company adopted SFAS No. 158, as it relates to recognizing the funded status of its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans, and the related disclosure requirements, as of December 31, 2006. The requirement to measure the funded status as of the date of the year-end statement of financial position was adopted on January 1, 2008. Upon adoption, the Company recorded a reduction to retained earnings of $18.1 million ($11.2 million, net of tax) and an increase to accumulated other comprehensive income of $4.2 million ($2.6 million, net of tax).
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, clarifies the definition of fair value within that framework, and expands disclosures about the use of fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to fair value measurements required by existing accounting pronouncements and does not require any new fair value measurements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008; see Note 6 for disclosures required under SFAS No. 157. The Company has not adopted SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities as permitted by FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, which provided a deferral of such provisions until 2009.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities. Entities will be required to provide enhanced disclosures about: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedge items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 161 beginning in fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the new disclosure requirements will have on its consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
6
Table of Contents
3. Additional Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Information
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Substantially all inventories located in the United States are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Other inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
June 29, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||
Components at the lower of FIFO cost or market | |||||||||
Raw materials and work in process | $ | 142,261 | $ | 149,954 | $ | 136,006 | |||
Motorcycle finished goods | 114,590 | 107,768 | 123,262 | ||||||
Parts and accessories and general merchandise | 118,318 | 124,109 | 116,799 | ||||||
Inventory at lower of FIFO cost or market | 375,169 | 381,831 | 376,067 | ||||||
Excess of FIFO over LIFO cost | 33,773 | 32,134 | 31,098 | ||||||
$ | 341,396 | $ | 349,697 | $ | 344,969 | ||||
The reconciliation of net income to net cash (used by) provided by operating activities is as follows (in thousands):
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 410,368 | $ | 482,800 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation | 102,619 | 105,809 | ||||||
Provision for employee long-term benefits | 41,403 | 37,692 | ||||||
Stock compensation expense | 12,110 | 10,946 | ||||||
Loss (gain) on current year securitizations | 5,370 | (32,494 | ) | |||||
Net change in wholesale finance receivables | 246,301 | 247,222 | ||||||
Origination of retail finance receivables held for sale | (1,539,989 | ) | (1,650,053 | ) | ||||
Collections on retail finance receivables held for sale | 139,592 | 34,062 | ||||||
Proceeds from securitization of retail finance receivables | 467,722 | 1,742,408 | ||||||
Contributions to pension and postretirement plans | (8,518 | ) | (6,539 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency adjustments | (10,103 | ) | 1,706 | |||||
Other, net | 22,303 | 18,411 | ||||||
Changes in current assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | (12,370 | ) | (18,242 | ) | ||||
Finance receivables - accrued interest and other | 1,074 | (5,954 | ) | |||||
Inventories | 21,341 | (53,352 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 74,338 | 147,073 | ||||||
Other | (12,577 | ) | 960 | |||||
Total adjustments | (449,384 | ) | 579,655 | |||||
Net cash (used by) provided by operating activities | $ | (39,016 | ) | $ | 1,062,455 | |||
7
Table of Contents
4. Impairment of Investment in Retained Securitization Interests
During the six months ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $6.3 million and $3.5 million, respectively, on its retained securitization interests (a component of Finance receivables held for investment in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets). Retained securitization interests are recorded at fair value, which is based on the present value of future expected cash flows using the Company’s best estimate of key assumptions for credit losses, prepayment speed and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. During the six months ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, the fair value of certain retained securitization interests was lower than the amortized cost, which indicated impairment. These impairments were considered permanent and as a result the investment in retained securitization interests has been appropriately written down to fair value. The decline in fair value was due to higher actual and anticipated credit losses on certain securitization portfolios. During the six months ended July 1, 2007, the higher actual and anticipated credit losses were partially offset by a slowing in actual and expected prepayment speeds. These charges were recorded as a reduction of Financial services income.
5. Restructuring Costs
In response to U.S. retail trends and uncertainty regarding the future of the economy, the Company announced plans on April 17, 2008 to ship fewer motorcycles to its worldwide dealer network in 2008 than it shipped in 2007. The Company executed the majority of this shipment reduction during the second quarter of 2008. The total shipment reduction is being achieved through temporary plant shutdowns, adjusted daily production rates and a workforce reduction involving approximately 730 positions. The workforce reduction plan, which was finalized during the second quarter of 2008, includes a combination of voluntary retirements, the elimination of some contract workers, employee terminations, layoffs and attrition. As a result of the workforce reduction plan, the Company recorded an $11.5 million charge during the second quarter of 2008 within Selling, administrative and engineering expense. These costs consist of employee severance and special retiree benefits for those individuals eligible to receive benefits. The Company had previously estimated a range of $20 million to $25 million when the restructuring plan was first announced on April 17, 2008. The difference between estimated and actual results is due to a larger than estimated proportion of contract workers; contract workers were not eligible for severance and special retiree benefits. Through June 29, 2008, approximately 400 employees and contract workers have departed from the Company.
Of the total restructuring reserve, $7.5 million is recorded within Accrued liabilities and $4.0 million is recorded within Postretirement healthcare benefits in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 29, 2008.
The following table summarizes the Company’s restructuring reserve recorded in Accrued liabilities as of June 29, 2008 (in thousands):
Employee Severance | ||||
Original reserve | $ | 7,594 | ||
Utilized - cash | (76 | ) | ||
Balance, end of period | $ | 7,518 | ||
6. Fair Value Measurements
In determining fair value of financial assets and liabilities, the Company uses various valuation techniques. The availability of observable inputs varies from instrument to instrument and depends on a variety of factors including the type of instrument, whether the instrument is actively traded, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. For many financial instruments, pricing inputs are readily observable in the market, the valuation methodology used is widely accepted by market participants, and the valuation does not require significant management discretion. For other financial instruments, pricing inputs are less observable in the marketplace and may require management judgment.
The Company assesses the inputs used to measure fair value using a three-tier hierarchy. The hierarchy indicates the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Level 1 inputs include quoted prices for identical instruments
8
Table of Contents
and are the most observable. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and observable inputs such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity rates and yield curves. Level 3 inputs are not observable in the market and include management’s own judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable and unobservable inputs is reflected in the hierarchy assessment disclosed in the table below.
The following table presents information about the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 29, 2008, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value (in thousands):
Balance as of June 29, 2008 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||
Cash equivalents and marketable securities | $ | 531,991 | $ | 531,467 | $ | 524 | — | |||||
Derivatives | 7,362 | — | 7,362 | — | ||||||||
Investment in retained securitization interests | 461,657 | — | — | $ | 461,657 | |||||||
$ | 1,001,010 | $ | 531,467 | $ | 7,886 | $ | 461,657 | |||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 21,665 | — | $ | 21,665 | — | ||||||
The following table presents additional information about the Company’s Investment in retained securitization interests which is measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3). The Investment in retained securitization interests is valued using pricing models and discounted cash flow methodologies incorporating assumptions that, in management’s judgment, reflect the assumptions a marketplace participant would use at June 29, 2008. Refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates” under Item 7 and Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for further discussion regarding the assumptions used to value the Investment in retained securitization interests.
(in thousands) | Three months ended June 29, 2008 | Six months ended June 29, 2008 | ||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 496,511 | $ | 407,742 | ||||
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized): | ||||||||
Included in Financial services income | 11,076 | 26,234 | ||||||
Included in other comprehensive income | (20,717 | ) | (8,323 | ) | ||||
Sales, repurchases and settlements, net | (25,213 | ) | 36,004 | |||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 461,657 | $ | 461,657 | ||||
As discussed in Note 4, Financial services income for the three and six months ended June 29, 2008 includes an impairment charge of $6.3 million.
7. Product Warranty and Safety Recall Campaigns
The Company currently provides a standard two-year limited warranty on all new motorcycles sold worldwide, except for Japan, where the Company provides a standard three-year limited warranty on all new motorcycles sold. The warranty coverage for the retail customer includes parts and labor and generally begins when the motorcycle is sold to a retail customer. The Company maintains reserves for future warranty claims using an estimated cost per unit sold, which is based primarily on historical Company claim information. Additionally, the Company has from time to time initiated certain voluntary safety recall campaigns. The Company reserves for all estimated costs associated with safety recalls in the period that the safety recalls are announced. Changes in the Company’s warranty and safety recall liability were as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 77,208 | $ | 66,163 | $ | 70,523 | $ | 66,385 | ||||||||
Warranties issued during the period | 13,407 | 14,759 | 25,648 | 26,295 | ||||||||||||
Settlements made during the period | (15,165 | ) | (16,724 | ) | (29,166 | ) | (31,029 | ) | ||||||||
Recalls and changes to pre-existing warranty liabilities | 5,977 | 9,819 | 14,422 | 12,366 | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 81,427 | $ | 74,017 | $ | 81,427 | $ | 74,017 | ||||||||
9
Table of Contents
The liability for safety recall campaigns was $2.9 million and $4.3 million as of June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, respectively.
8. Business Segments
The Company operates in two business segments: Motorcycles & Related Products (Motorcycles) and Financial Services (Financial Services). The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately based on the fundamental differences in their operations. Selected segment information is set forth below (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||||
Motorcycles net revenue | $ | 1,572,569 | $ | 1,620,218 | $ | 2,878,882 | $ | 2,799,093 | ||||
Gross profit | 561,924 | 605,167 | 1,038,061 | 1,028,213 | ||||||||
Operating expenses | 245,841 | 218,641 | 460,374 | 406,444 | ||||||||
Operating income from Motorcycles | 316,083 | 386,526 | 577,687 | 621,769 | ||||||||
Financial Services income | 106,840 | 112,330 | 200,129 | 221,493 | ||||||||
Financial Services expense | 69,693 | 47,121 | 128,075 | 97,347 | ||||||||
Operating income from Financial Services | 37,147 | 65,209 | 72,054 | 124,146 | ||||||||
Corporate expenses | 7,367 | 6,532 | 12,825 | 11,471 | ||||||||
Income from operations | $ | 345,863 | $ | 445,203 | $ | 636,916 | $ | 734,444 | ||||
As discussed in Note 4, Financial Services income for the three and six months ended June 29, 2008 includes an impairment charge of $6.3 million. Financial Services income for the six months ended July 1, 2007 includes an impairment charge of $3.5 million.
As discussed in Note 5, Operating expenses of the Motorcycles segment for the three and six months ended June 29, 2008 includes an $11.5 million restructuring charge. No part of the restructuring charge relates to Financial Services.
10
Table of Contents
9. Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation for basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||||
Numerator: | ||||||||||||
Net income used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share | $ | 222,787 | $ | 290,490 | $ | 410,368 | $ | 482,800 | ||||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per share- weighted-average common shares | 235,067 | 253,155 | 236,067 | 255,240 | ||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities - employee stock compensation plan | 247 | 862 | 210 | 847 | ||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share- adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding | 235,314 | 254,017 | 236,277 | 256,087 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.95 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.89 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.95 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.89 |
Outstanding options to purchase 5.4 million and 0.8 million shares of common stock for the three months ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, respectively, and 5.0 million and 0.6 million shares of common stock for the six months ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, respectively, were not included in the Company’s computation of dilutive securities because the exercise price was greater than the market price and therefore the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
10. Comprehensive Income
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 222,787 | $ | 290,490 | $ | 410,368 | $ | 482,800 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (96 | ) | 5,433 | 21,374 | 8,844 | |||||||||||
Changes in net unrealized gains and (losses), net of tax: | ||||||||||||||||
Retained securitization interest | (13,362 | ) | 468 | (5,442 | ) | (8,704 | ) | |||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | 10,226 | (356 | ) | 10,769 | (926 | ) | ||||||||||
Marketable securities | — | 88 | 68 | 701 | ||||||||||||
Unrecognized pension and postretirement benefit plan liabilities | 2,623 | 3,742 | 5,246 | 7,484 | ||||||||||||
$ | 222,178 | $ | 299,865 | $ | 442,383 | $ | 490,199 | |||||||||
11
Table of Contents
11. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has several defined benefit pension plans and postretirement healthcare benefit plans (Retirement Plans), which cover substantially all employees of the Motorcycles segment. The Company also has unfunded supplemental employee retirement plan agreements (SERPA) which were instituted to replace benefits lost under the Tax Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993. Components of net periodic benefit costs were as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||||||||
Pension and SERPA Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 12,841 | $ | 12,912 | $ | 25,682 | $ | 25,824 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 17,148 | 14,941 | 34,296 | 29,882 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (22,015 | ) | (20,209 | ) | (44,030 | ) | (40,418 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized: | ||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost | 1,540 | 1,673 | 3,080 | 3,346 | ||||||||||||
Net loss | 1,604 | 2,919 | 3,208 | 5,838 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 11,118 | $ | 12,236 | $ | 22,236 | $ | 24,472 | ||||||||
Postretirement Healthcare Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 3,270 | $ | 3,191 | $ | 6,540 | $ | 6,382 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 5,410 | 4,895 | 10,820 | 9,790 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (2,808 | ) | (2,496 | ) | (5,616 | ) | (4,992 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized: | ||||||||||||||||
Prior service credit | (281 | ) | (281 | ) | (562 | ) | (562 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss | 1,375 | 1,734 | 2,750 | 3,468 | ||||||||||||
Special retiree benefits | 3,955 | — | 3,955 | — | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 10,921 | $ | 7,043 | $ | 17,887 | $ | 14,086 | ||||||||
The Company does not expect to make additional contributions to further fund its pension and postretirement healthcare plans during the remainder of 2008 beyond the amount of current benefit payments for SERPA and postretirement healthcare plans. During the remainder of 2008, the Company expects to continue its practice of funding the SERPA and postretirement healthcare plans in amounts equal to benefits paid during the year.
As discussed in Note 5, the Company recorded a restructuring reserve of $11.5 million during the three months ended June 29, 2008. Of this amount, $4.0 million relates to postretirement healthcare benefits which are included as Special retiree benefits in the table above.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, product and other matters. In determining required reserves related to these items, the Company carefully analyzes cases and considers the likelihood of adverse judgments or outcomes, as well as the potential range of possible loss. The required reserves are monitored on an ongoing basis and are updated based on new developments or new information in each matter.
Shareholder Lawsuits:
A number of shareholder class action lawsuits were filed between May 18, 2005 and July 1, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. On February 14, 2006, the court consolidated all of the actions into a single case, captionedIn re Harley-Davidson, Inc. Securities Litigation, and appointed Lead Plaintiffs and Co-Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel. Pursuant to the schedule set by the court, on October 2, 2006, the Lead Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint, which names
12
Table of Contents
the Company and Jeffrey L. Bleustein, James L. Ziemer, and James M. Brostowitz, who are current or former Company officers, as defendants. The Consolidated Complaint alleges securities law violations and seeks unspecified damages relating generally to the Company’s April 13, 2005 announcement that it was reducing short-term production growth and planned increases of motorcycle shipments from 317,000 units in 2004 to a new 2005 target of 329,000 units (compared to its original target of 339,000 units). On December 18, 2006, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint in its entirety. Briefing of the motion to dismiss was completed in April 2007.
Three shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on June 3, 2005, October 25, 2005 (this lawsuit was later voluntarily dismissed) and December 2, 2005 and two shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in Milwaukee County Circuit Court on July 22, 2005 and November 16, 2005 against some or all of the following current or former directors and officers of the Company: Jeffrey L. Bleustein, James L. Ziemer, James M. Brostowitz, Barry K. Allen, Richard I. Beattie, George H. Conrades, Judson C. Green, Donald A. James, Sara L. Levinson, George L. Miles, Jr., James A. Norling, James A. McCaslin, Donna F. Zarcone, Jon R. Flickinger, Gail A. Lione, Ronald M. Hutchinson, W. Kenneth Sutton, Jr. and John A. Hevey. The lawsuits also name the Company as a nominal defendant. In general, the shareholder derivative complaints include factual allegations similar to those in the class action complaints and allegations that officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company. On February 14, 2006, the state court consolidated the two state court derivative actions and appointed Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Plaintiffs’ counsel, and on April 24, 2006, the state court ordered that the consolidated state court derivative action be stayed until after motions to dismiss the federal securities class action are decided. On February 15, 2006, the federal court consolidated the federal derivative lawsuits with the securities and ERISA (see below) actions for administrative purposes. On February 1, 2007, the federal court appointed Lead Plaintiff and Co-Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel in the consolidated federal derivative action.
On August 25, 2005, a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. As noted above, on February 15, 2006, the court ordered the ERISA action consolidated with the federal derivative and securities actions for administrative purposes. Pursuant to the schedule set by the court, on October 2, 2006, the ERISA plaintiff filed an Amended Class Action Complaint, which named the Company, the Harley-Davidson Motor Company Retirement Plans Committee, the Company’s Leadership and Strategy Council, Harold A. Scott, James L. Ziemer, James M. Brostowitz, Gail A. Lione, Joanne M. Bischmann, Karl M. Eberle, Jon R. Flickinger, Ronald M. Hutchinson, James A. McCaslin, W. Kenneth Sutton, Jr., and Donna F. Zarcone, who are current or former Company officers or employees, as defendants. In general, the ERISA complaint includes factual allegations similar to those in the shareholder class action lawsuits and alleges on behalf of participants in certain Harley-Davidson retirement savings plans that the plan fiduciaries breached their ERISA fiduciary duties. On December 18, 2006, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the ERISA complaint in its entirety. Briefing of the motion to dismiss was completed in April 2007.
The Company believes the allegations against all of the defendants in the lawsuits against the Company are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend against them. Since all of these matters are in the preliminary stages, the Company is unable to predict the scope or outcome or quantify their eventual impact, if any, on the Company. At this time, the Company is also unable to estimate associated expenses or possible losses. The Company maintains insurance that may limit its financial exposure for defense costs and liability for an unfavorable outcome, should it not prevail, for claims covered by the insurance coverage.
Environmental Matters:
The Company is involved with government agencies and groups of potentially responsible parties in various environmental matters, including a matter involving the cleanup of soil and groundwater contamination at its York, Pennsylvania facility. The York facility was formerly used by the U.S. Navy and AMF prior to the purchase of the York facility by the Company from AMF in 1981. Although the Company is not certain as to the full extent of the environmental contamination at the York facility, it has been working with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) since 1986 in undertaking environmental investigation and remediation activities, including an ongoing site-wide remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS). In January 1995, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the Agreement) with the Navy. The Agreement calls for the Navy and the Company to contribute
13
Table of Contents
amounts into a trust equal to 53% and 47%, respectively, of future costs associated with environmental investigation and remediation activities at the York facility (Response Costs). The trust administers the payment of the Response Costs incurred at the York facility as covered by the Agreement.
In February 2002, the Company was advised by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that it considers some of the Company’s remediation activities at the York facility to be subject to the EPA’s corrective action program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and offered the Company the option of addressing corrective action under a RCRA facility lead agreement. In July 2005, the York facility was designated as the first site in Pennsylvania to be addressed under the “One Cleanup Program.” The program provides a more streamlined and efficient oversight of voluntary remediation by both PADEP and EPA and will be carried out consistent with the Agreement with the Navy. As a result, the RCRA facility lead agreement has been superseded.
Although the RI/FS is still underway and substantial uncertainty exists concerning the nature and scope of the additional environmental investigation and remediation that will ultimately be required at the York facility, the Company estimates that its share of the future Response Costs at the York facility will be approximately $6.7 million. The Company has established reserves for this amount, which are included in Accrued liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The estimate of the Company’s future Response Costs that will be incurred at the York facility is based on reports of independent environmental consultants retained by the Company, the actual costs incurred to date and the estimated costs to complete the necessary investigation and remediation activities. Response Costs related to the remediation of soil are expected to be incurred over a period of several years ending in 2012. Response Costs related to ground water remediation may continue for some time beyond 2012. However, these Response Costs are expected to be much lower than those related to the remediation of soil.
Under the terms of the sale of the Commercial Vehicles Division in 1996, the Company has agreed to indemnify Utilimaster Corporation, until December 2008, for certain claims related to environmental contamination present at the date of sale, up to $20.0 million. Based on the environmental studies performed, the Company does not expect to incur any material expenditures under this indemnification.
Product Liability Matters:
Additionally, the Company is involved in product liability suits related to the operation of its business. The Company accrues for claim exposures that are probable of occurrence and can be reasonably estimated. The Company also maintains insurance coverage for product liability exposures. The Company believes that its accruals and insurance coverage are adequate and that product liability will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
13. Subsequent Events
On July 11, 2008, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement to purchase the Italian motorcycle maker MV Agusta Group (MVAG). Under the agreement, the Company will acquire 100% of MV Agusta Group shares for total consideration of approximately €70 million (approximately $109 million), which includes the satisfaction of existing bank debt for approximately €45 million (approximately $70 million). The acquisition is expected to close during the third quarter of 2008, pending the satisfaction of contingencies and receipt of regulatory approvals. The Company intends to fund the transaction primarily through euro-denominated debt.
On July 16, 2008, the Company and HDFS entered into new credit facilities totaling $1.90 billion. These facilities, a $950.0 million 364-day facility and a $950.0 million three-year facility, replace the existing $1.70 billion in combined credit facilities previously available to HDFS. Subsequent to entering the new credit facilities, the combined total of commercial paper and borrowings on the new credit facilities is limited to $1.90 billion, up from $1.70 billion.
14
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Harley-Davidson, Inc. is the parent company for the groups of companies doing business as Harley-Davidson Motor Company (HDMC), Buell Motorcycle Company (Buell) and Harley-Davidson Financial Services (HDFS). HDMC produces heavyweight motorcycles and offers a line of motorcycle parts, accessories, general merchandise and related services. HDMC manufactures five families of motorcycles: Touring, Dyna®, Softail®, Sportster® and VRSC™. Buell produces premium sport performance motorcycles and offers a line of motorcycle parts, accessories and apparel. HDFS provides wholesale and retail financing and insurance programs primarily to Harley-Davidson and Buell dealers and customers.
The “% Change” figures included in this section have been calculated using unrounded dollar amounts and may differ from calculations using the rounded dollar amounts presented.
Overview and Outlook(1)
The Company’s 2008 second quarter net revenue of $1.57 billion was down 2.9% compared to the second quarter of 2007. The decrease in net revenue reflects the impact of lower shipment volumes partially offset by a positive impact which resulted from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and product mix. In addition, lower operating income from Financial Services, driven by a decrease in securitization income, contributed to a 23.3% decrease in the Company’s net income for the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007. Diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of 2008 were down 16.7% from the same quarter last year on lower net income which more than offset the positive impact of fewer weighted-average shares outstanding. Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding were 18.7 million lower in the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007 primarily due to the Company’s repurchases of common stock occurring over the last twelve months.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company shipped 80,326 Harley-Davidson motorcycles, 14,791 or 15.6% fewer units than in the same period last year reflecting the impact of previously announced plans to reduce 2008 shipments. On April 17, 2008, in view of U.S. retail trends and uncertainty about the future of the economy, the Company announced plans to ship 23,000 to 27,000 fewer Harley-Davidson motorcycles in 2008 than were shipped in 2007.
Retail sales of Harley-Davidson motorcycles in second quarter of 2008 continued to reflect the challenging U.S. economic climate. Worldwide retail sales of Harley-Davidson motorcycles by the Company’s independent dealers declined 3.6% during the second quarter of 2008 when compared to the same period last year. In the U.S., retail sales of Harley-Davidson motorcycles decreased 8.7% during the second quarter of 2008 while the heavyweight motorcycle industry in the U.S. decreased 0.8% during the same period. In international markets, sales of Harley-Davidson motorcycles increased 11.2% during the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007.
The Company monitors the motorcycle retail sales environment closely and regularly assesses its wholesale shipment plans. The Company remains committed to shipping fewer Harley-Davidson motorcycles to its worldwide dealer network than it expects they will sell at retail in 2008. The Company expects U.S. economic conditions and ongoing consumer concerns to continue to create challenges through the end of the year, but believes the previously announced shipment reduction plans and related workforce reduction position it appropriately for the current economic environment.
(1) | Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements |
The Company intends that certain matters discussed in this report are “forward-looking statements” intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such by reference to this footnote or because the context of the statement will include words such as the Company “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “plans,” or “estimates” or words of similar meaning. Similarly, statements that describe future plans, objectives, outlooks, targets, guidance or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this report. Certain of such risks and uncertainties are described in close proximity to such statements or elsewhere in this report, including under the caption “Cautionary Statements” included in this report, and in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Shareholders, potential investors, and other readers are urged to consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements and cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date indicated, or if no date is indicated as of the filing of this report (July 31, 2008), and the Company disclaims any obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
15
Table of Contents
On July 17, 2008 the Company reaffirmed its plans to ship 303,500 to 307,500 Harley-Davidson motorcycle units in 2008 and announced its expectation to ship between 74,000 and 78,000 Harley-Davidson motorcycles in the third quarter of 2008. The Company also reaffirmed its expectation as of that date for 2008 diluted earnings per share of $3.00 to $3.18 for 2008.
The Company believes it is fortunate to be dealing with the current economic environment from a position of financial strength and with the benefit of an exceptionally powerful brand. The Company is optimistic about its long-term business prospects and plans to continue to invest in marketing, product development and international markets to drive future growth. In support of the international growth strategy, the Company announced in July 2008 its plans to acquire the MV Agusta Group which will enhance the Company’s presence in Europe and its penetration into the performance segment of the motorcycle market. In addition, the Company expects it will continue to utilize available free cash flow to return value to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 29, 2008
Compared to the Three Months Ended July 1, 2007
Overall
For the three months ended June 29, 2008, net revenue totaled $1.57 billion, a $47.6 million or 2.9% decrease from the same period last year. Net income was $222.8 million, a decrease of $67.7 million, or 23.3%. Diluted earnings per share were $0.95, a decrease of $0.19, or 16.7%. Diluted earnings per share during the second quarter of 2008 were positively impacted by a decrease in the weighted-average shares outstanding, which were 235.3 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared to 254.0 million in the second quarter of 2007. The decrease in weighted-average shares outstanding was driven by the Company’s repurchases of common stock over the last year. The Company’s second quarter 2008 share repurchases are discussed in further detail under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
16
Table of Contents
Motorcycle Unit Shipments & Net Revenue
The following table includes wholesale motorcycle unit shipments and net revenue for the Motorcycles & Related Products segment (dollars in millions):
Three months ended | |||||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | (Decrease) Increase | % Change | ||||||||||
Motorcycle Unit Shipments | |||||||||||||
United States | 51,449 | 67,951 | (16,502 | ) | (24.3 | )% | |||||||
International | 28,877 | 27,166 | 1,711 | 6.3 | |||||||||
Harley-Davidson motorcycle units | 80,326 | 95,117 | (14,791 | ) | (15.6 | ) | |||||||
Touring motorcycle units | 25,248 | 34,671 | (9,423 | ) | (27.2 | ) | |||||||
Custom motorcycle units* | 41,922 | 39,320 | 2,602 | 6.6 | |||||||||
Sportster motorcycle units | 13,156 | 21,126 | (7,970 | ) | (37.7 | ) | |||||||
Harley-Davidson motorcycle units | 80,326 | 95,117 | (14,791 | ) | (15.6 | ) | |||||||
Buell motorcycle units | 4,072 | 3,179 | 893 | 28.1 | % | ||||||||
Net Revenue | |||||||||||||
Harley-Davidson motorcycles | $ | 1,187.1 | $ | 1,254.2 | $ | (67.1 | ) | (5.3 | )% | ||||
Buell motorcycles | 41.5 | 28.6 | 12.9 | 45.1 | |||||||||
Total motorcycles | 1,228.6 | 1,282.8 | (54.2 | ) | (4.2 | ) | |||||||
Parts & Accessories | 265.7 | 263.4 | 2.3 | 0.9 | |||||||||
General Merchandise | 76.8 | 72.7 | 4.1 | 5.6 | |||||||||
Other | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.2 | N/M | |||||||||
Net revenue | $ | 1,572.6 | $ | 1,620.2 | $ | (47.6 | ) | (2.9 | )% | ||||
* | Custom motorcycle units, as used in this table, include Dyna, Softail, VRSC and CVO models. |
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company shipped 80,326 Harley-Davidson motorcycles, a decrease of 14,791 motorcycles, or 15.6%, from the same quarter last year. The Company’s shipments in the U.S. in 2008 continue to be negatively impacted by the challenging economic environment. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company began to implement its plan to ship 23,000 to 27,000 fewer Harley-Davidson motorcycles in 2008 than it shipped in 2007. The Company’s international growth is the result of the Company’s strategic focus on global markets. Outside of the U.S., international shipments grew 6.3% during the second quarter of 2008, which is consistent with the Company’s expectation of continued international growth.(1) During the second quarter of 2008, international shipments made up 35.9% of total shipments compared to 28.6% in the same period last year. At the same time, the Company closely monitors international markets for possible changes in economic conditions. Going forward, the Company plans to continue its investment in international markets to drive future growth in support of the Company’s long-term strategy.(1)
Motorcycles segment net revenue decreased $47.6 million, or 2.9%. Net revenue was lower by approximately $182 million as a direct result of the 15.6% lower shipment volume. Partially offsetting the unfavorability in volume was favorability of approximately $11 million from wholesale price increases on Harley-Davidson motorcycles and favorability resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates of approximately $48 million. Product mix changes, occurring within and between the motorcycle families, also increased revenue by approximately $61 million. Second quarter 2007 net revenue was also impacted by sales incentives and a one-time special financing promotion that was not repeated in the second quarter of 2008. This resulted in approximately $15 million of favorability in the second quarter of 2008.
17
Table of Contents
Product mix is ultimately driven by retail demand, but can vary due to a variety of factors. For example, the second quarter of 2008 year over year mix changes were affected by the planned shipment reduction beginning in the second quarter of 2008, which led to a lower percentage of Touring and Sportster motorcycle shipments when compared to the second quarter of 2007. Touring models comprised 31.4% and 36.5% of total shipments for the three months ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, respectively, while Sportster models comprised 16.4% and 22.2% of total shipments for the three months ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, respectively. Custom model unit shipments increased as a percentage of total shipments due in part to the introduction of two new Softail models and increased demand for Dyna models.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold was $1.01 billion for the Motorcycles segment in the second quarter of 2008, a decrease of $4.4 million or 0.4% versus the corresponding period last year. Cost of goods sold was also directly impacted by the 15.6% decline in shipment volume, which resulted in a decrease of approximately $95 million. Partially offsetting this decrease was the impact of higher manufacturing costs of approximately $43 million. Higher manufacturing costs were largely the result of a higher fixed cost per unit and increased product content, such as new models and new features and options on the Company’s motorcycles. Cost of goods sold also increased by approximately $28 million resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and approximately $18 million related to changes in product mix. Raw material surcharges were approximately $2 million higher when compared to the prior year second quarter.
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $561.9 million for the Motorcycles segment for the second quarter 2008, a decrease of $43.2 million or 7.1% versus the same period last year. Gross margin for the second quarter of 2008 was 35.7% compared to 37.4% for the second quarter of 2007. The factors impacting the change in gross margin are detailed under “Motorcycle Unit Shipments and Net Revenue” and “Cost of Goods Sold” above.
Financial Services
The following table includes the condensed statements of operations for the Financial Services segment (in millions):
Three months ended | |||||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | Increase (Decrease) | % Change | ||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 62.4 | $ | 45.4 | $ | 17.0 | 37.6 | % | |||||
Income from securitizations | 12.0 | 36.0 | (24.0 | ) | (66.8 | ) | |||||||
Other income | 32.4 | 30.9 | 1.5 | 4.7 | |||||||||
Financial services income | 106.8 | 112.3 | (5.5 | ) | (4.9 | ) | |||||||
Interest expense | 28.0 | 18.0 | 10.0 | 55.7 | |||||||||
Operating expenses | 41.7 | 29.1 | 12.6 | 43.1 | |||||||||
Financial services expense | 69.7 | 47.1 | 22.6 | 47.9 | |||||||||
Operating income from financial services | $ | 37.1 | $ | 65.2 | $ | (28.1 | ) | (43.0 | )% | ||||
During the second quarter of 2008, interest income benefited from higher average retail outstanding receivables, partially offset by lower wholesale lending rates. Interest expense was higher in the second quarter of 2008 due to increased borrowings to support higher outstanding retail receivables, partially offset by lower borrowing rates as compared to the same period of 2007. The increase in retail receivables outstanding was driven by the Company’s decision not to complete a securitization in the second quarter of 2008 due to capital market volatility. The increase in operating expenses in the second quarter of 2008 is primarily due to an increase in the provision for credit losses.
Income from securitizations in the second quarter of 2008 decreased as compared to the second quarter of 2007 primarily due to
18
Table of Contents
the absence of a securitization transaction during the second quarter of 2008. This compares to a $950.0 million securitization transaction that was completed in the second quarter of 2007 with a gain of $19.5 million. Additionally, income from securitizations was also negatively impacted during the second quarter of 2008 by a $6.3 million impairment charge on certain retained securitization interests. The write down, which is considered a permanent impairment, resulted from a decline in the fair value of certain retained securitization interests due to higher actual and anticipated credit losses on those securitization portfolios.
HDFS reviews its assumptions for determining the fair value of the investment in retained securitization interests each quarter. Key assumptions include expected losses, prepayment speed and discount rate. HDFS determines these assumptions by reviewing historical trends and current economic conditions. Given the challenging U.S. economy, credit losses on HDFS’ retail installment loans have increased and as a result, the fair value of retained securitization interests have declined and in some cases this decline is permanent. Depending on the behavior of future loss rates, prepayment speeds and the discount rate, HDFS could experience further write-downs of its retained interests, which had a fair value of $461.7 million as of June 29, 2008. A write-down in the retained securitization interest generally represents a non-cash charge in the period in which it is recorded, but ultimately represents a reduction in the residual cash flow that HDFS expects to receive from its investment in retained securitization interests.
Changes in the allowance for finance credit losses on finance receivables held for investment were as follows (in millions):
Three months ended | ||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 30.1 | $ | 27.4 | ||||
Provision for finance credit losses | 10.4 | (0.1 | ) | |||||
Charge-offs, net of recoveries | (4.6 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 35.9 | $ | 26.9 | ||||
HDFS’ periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is generally based on HDFS’ past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, and current economic conditions. HDFS believes the allowance is adequate to cover estimated losses of principal in the existing portfolio.
Operating Expenses
The following table includes operating expenses for the Motorcycles segment and Corporate (in millions):
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | Increase | % Change | |||||||||
Motorcycles and Related Products | ||||||||||||
Selling & administrative | $ | 198.5 | $ | 173.4 | $ | 25.1 | 14.6 | % | ||||
Engineering | 47.4 | 45.4 | 2.0 | 4.4 | ||||||||
Corporate | 7.3 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 12.8 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 253.2 | $ | 225.3 | $ | 27.9 | 12.5 | % | ||||
Total operating expenses, which include selling, administrative and engineering expenses, were 16.1% and 13.9% of net revenue for the second quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Selling and administrative expenses were higher due primarily to an $11.5 million restructuring charge incurred by the Company during the second quarter of 2008 (see Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion) and higher international operating costs associated with the Company’s international growth.
19
Table of Contents
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company’s effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2008 was 36.0% compared to 35.5% in the same quarter last year. The increase was due to the expiration of the federal research and development tax credit as of December 31, 2007. Assuming the retroactive reinstatement of this tax credit, the Company expects its full year effective tax rate for 2008 will be 35.5%.(1)
20
Table of Contents
Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 29, 2008
Compared to the Six Months Ended July 1, 2007
Overall
For the six months ended June 29, 2008, net revenue totaled $2.88 billion, a $79.8 million or 2.9% increase from the same period last year. Net income was $410.4 million, a decrease of $72.4 million, or 15.0%. Diluted earnings per share were $1.74, a decrease of $0.15, or 7.9%. Diluted earnings per share during the first half of 2008 were positively impacted by a decrease in the weighted-average shares outstanding, which were 236.3 million in the first half of 2008 compared to 256.1 million in the first half of 2007. The decrease in weighted-average shares outstanding was driven by the Company’s repurchases of common stock over the last year. The Company’s 2008 share repurchases are discussed in further detail under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Motorcycle Unit Shipments & Net Revenue
The following table includes wholesale motorcycle unit shipments and net revenue for the Motorcycles & Related Products segment (dollars in millions):
Six months ended | |||||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | (Decrease) Increase | % Change | ||||||||||
Motorcycle Unit Shipments | |||||||||||||
United States | 99,275 | 116,691 | (17,416 | ) | (14.9 | )% | |||||||
International | 52,919 | 46,187 | 6,732 | 14.6 | |||||||||
Harley-Davidson motorcycle units | 152,194 | 162,878 | (10,684 | ) | (6.6 | ) | |||||||
Touring motorcycle units | 51,683 | 56,473 | (4,790 | ) | (8.5 | ) | |||||||
Custom motorcycle units* | 70,994 | 70,088 | 906 | 1.3 | |||||||||
Sportster motorcycle units | 29,517 | 36,317 | (6,800 | ) | (18.7 | ) | |||||||
Harley-Davidson motorcycle units | 152,194 | 162,878 | (10,684 | ) | (6.6 | ) | |||||||
Buell motorcycle units | 6,464 | 5,737 | 727 | 12.7 | % | ||||||||
Net Revenue | |||||||||||||
Harley-Davidson motorcycles | $ | 2,204.4 | $ | 2,145.7 | $ | 58.7 | 2.7 | % | |||||
Buell motorcycles | 63.6 | 50.3 | 13.3 | 26.5 | |||||||||
Total motorcycles | 2,268.0 | 2,196.0 | 72.0 | 3.3 | |||||||||
Parts & Accessories | 447.6 | 451.6 | (4.0 | ) | (0.9 | ) | |||||||
General Merchandise | 160.8 | 148.8 | 12.0 | 8.0 | |||||||||
Other | 2.5 | 2.7 | (0.2 | ) | N/M | ||||||||
Net revenue | $ | 2,878.9 | $ | 2,799.1 | $ | 79.8 | 2.9 | % | |||||
* | Custom motorcycle units, as used in this table, include Dyna, Softail, VRSC and CVO models. |
During the first six months of 2008, the Company shipped 152,194 Harley-Davidson motorcycles, a decrease of 10,684 motorcycles, or 6.6%, from the same period last year. The Company’s shipments in the U.S. in 2008 continue to be negatively impacted by the challenging economic environment. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company began to implement its plan to ship 23,000 to 27,000 fewer Harley-Davidson motorcycles in 2008 than it shipped in 2007. Additionally, shipments during the first half of 2007 were directly impacted by a strike at the Company’s assembly plant in York, Pennsylvania that resulted in approximately four weeks of lost production. International shipments grew 14.6% during the first half of 2008. During the first half of 2008, international shipments made up 34.8% of total shipments compared to 28.4% in the same period last year.
21
Table of Contents
Motorcycles segment net revenue increased $79.8 million, or 2.9%. Net revenue was higher as a result of favorability resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates of approximately $94 million. Product mix changes, occurring within and between the motorcycle families, also increased revenue by approximately $92 million. Wholesale price increases on Harley-Davidson motorcycles contributed approximately $18 million to revenue. These revenue increases were partially offset by lower sales volumes of approximately $139 million, primarily as a result of the 6.6% lower shipment volume. First half 2007 net revenue was also impacted by sales incentives and a one-time special financing promotion that was not repeated in the first half of 2008. This resulted in approximately $15 million of favorability in the first half of 2008.
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Retail Sales
The Company sells its motorcycles at wholesale to an independent network of dealers and distributors who in turn sell the Company’s products at retail. Worldwide retail sales of Harley-Davidson motorcycles decreased 4.3% during the first six months of 2008 relative to the same period last year. Retail sales of Harley-Davidson motorcycles decreased 10.2% in the United States while growing 13.2% internationally. On an industry-wide basis, the heavyweight (651+cc) portion of the market was down 4.4% in the United States (through June) while growing 3.7% in Europe (through May) when compared to the same periods in 2007. The following table includes retail unit sales of Harley-Davidson motorcycles:
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Retail Sales(a)
Heavyweight (651+cc)
Six months ended | ||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | (Decrease) Increase | % Change | |||||||
North America Region | ||||||||||
United States | 130,437 | 145,282 | (14,845 | ) | (10.2 | )% | ||||
Canada | 10,870 | 9,578 | 1,292 | 13.5 | ||||||
Total North America Region | 141,307 | 154,860 | (13,553 | ) | (8.8 | ) | ||||
Europe Region (Includes Middle East and Africa) | ||||||||||
Europe(b) | 25,803 | 24,293 | 1,510 | 6.2 | ||||||
Other | 2,477 | 1,755 | 722 | 41.1 | ||||||
Total Europe Region | 28,280 | 26,048 | 2,232 | 8.6 | ||||||
Asia Pacific Region | ||||||||||
Japan | 6,805 | 6,220 | 585 | 9.4 | ||||||
Other | 5,412 | 4,660 | 752 | 16.1 | ||||||
Total Asia Pacific Region | 12,217 | 10,880 | 1,337 | 12.3 | ||||||
Latin America Region | 4,258 | 2,648 | 1,610 | 60.8 | ||||||
Total Worldwide Retail Sales | 186,062 | 194,436 | (8,374 | ) | (4.3 | )% | ||||
(a) | Data source for retail sales figures shown above is sales warranty and registration information provided by Harley-Davidson dealers and compiled by the Company. The Company must rely on information that its dealers supply concerning retail sales and this information is subject to revision. Only Harley-Davidson motorcycles are included in the Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Retail Sales data. |
(b) | Data for Europe include Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. |
22
Table of Contents
The following table includes industry retail motorcycle registration data through the month indicated:
Motorcycle Industry Retail Registrations
Heavyweight (651+cc)
2008 | 2007 | (Decrease) Increase | % Change | |||||||
United States (June)(a) | 294,141 | 307,755 | (13,614 | ) | (4.4 | )% | ||||
Europe (May)(b) | 212,627 | 205,041 | 7,586 | 3.7 | % |
(a) | U.S. industry data includes 651+cc models derived from submission of motorcycle retail sales by each major manufacturer to an independent third party. |
(b) | Europe data includes Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Industry retail motorcycle registration data includes 651+cc models derived from information provided by Giral S.A., an independent agency. |
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold was $1.84 billion for the Motorcycles segment in the first half of 2008, an increase of $69.9 million or 3.9% versus the corresponding period last year. The increased cost was led by approximately $58 million of higher manufacturing costs, which were largely the result of a higher fixed cost per unit and increased product content, such as new models and new features and options on the Company’s motorcycles. Cost of goods sold also increased by approximately $48 million resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and approximately $28 million related to changes in product mix. Partially offsetting these cost increases were lower costs of approximately $64 million resulting from lower shipment volumes. Raw material surcharges were approximately $1 million higher when compared to the prior year first half.
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $1.04 billion for the Motorcycles segment for the first six months of 2008, an increase of $9.8 million or 1.0% versus the same period last year. Gross margin for the first half of 2008 was 36.1% compared to 36.7% for the first half of 2007. The factors impacting the change in gross margin are detailed under “Motorcycle Unit Shipments and Net Revenue” and “Cost of Goods Sold” above.
23
Table of Contents
Financial Services
The following table includes the condensed statements of operations for the Financial Services segment (in millions):
Six months ended | |||||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | Increase (Decrease) | % Change | ||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 117.7 | $ | 96.1 | $ | 21.6 | 22.5 | % | |||||
Income from securitizations | 22.2 | 65.2 | (43.0 | ) | (66.0 | ) | |||||||
Other income | 60.2 | 60.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
Financial services income | 200.1 | 221.5 | (21.4 | ) | (9.6 | ) | |||||||
Interest expense | 52.5 | 39.1 | 13.4 | 34.6 | |||||||||
Operating expenses | 75.5 | 58.3 | 17.2 | 29.5 | |||||||||
Financial services expense | 128.0 | 97.4 | 30.6 | 31.6 | |||||||||
Operating income from financial services | $ | 72.1 | $ | 124.1 | $ | (52.0 | ) | (42.0 | )% | ||||
During the first six months of 2008, interest income benefited from higher average retail outstanding receivables, partially offset by lower wholesale lending rates. Interest expense was higher during the first six months of 2008 due to increased borrowings to support growth in outstanding retail receivables, partially offset by lower borrowing rates as compared to the same period of 2007. The increase in retail receivables outstanding was driven by the Company’s decision not to complete a securitization in the second quarter of 2008 due to capital market volatility. The increase in operating expenses in the first six months of 2008 is primarily due to an increase in the provision for credit losses.
Income from securitizations during the first six months of 2008 was lower as compared to 2007 due primarily to the loss on the first quarter 2008 securitization transaction and the absence of a second quarter securitization transaction. This compares to two securitization transactions completed in the first six months of 2007.
During the first six months of 2008, HDFS sold $540.0 million in retail motorcycle loans in a securitization transaction and recognized a loss of $5.4 million, or 0.99% as a percentage of loans sold. This compares to a gain as a percentage of loans sold of 1.9%, or $32.5 million, on $1.75 billion of loans securitized in the first six months of 2007. The loss in 2008 was driven by increased securitization funding costs due to capital market volatility and higher projected credit losses. During the first six months of 2008, HDFS retained $54.0 million of the subordinated securities issued by the securitization trust. The subordinated securities that were retained have been included in the investment in retained securitization interests (a component of finance receivables held for investment) in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cash proceeds from the 2008 securitization transaction are net of the cost of the retained subordinated securities.
Additionally, income from securitizations was negatively impacted during the first six months of 2008 by a $6.3 million write down of certain retained securitization interests. The write down, which occurred in the second quarter of 2008 and is considered a permanent impairment, resulted from a decline in the fair value of certain retained securitization interests due to higher actual and anticipated credit losses on those securitization portfolios. This compares to an impairment charge of $3.5 million incurred during the first six months of 2007.
Annualized losses on HDFS’ managed retail motorcycle loans were 2.14% during the first six months of 2008 compared to 1.63% during the first six months of 2007. The 30-day delinquency rate for managed retail motorcycle loans at June 29, 2008 increased to 4.65% from 4.36% at July 1, 2007. Managed retail loans include loans held by HDFS as well as those sold through securitization transactions. The increase in losses was primarily due to a higher incidence of loss resulting from an increase in delinquent accounts. The Company expects that HDFS will continue to experience higher delinquencies and credit losses as a percentage of managed retail motorcycle loans in 2008 as compared to 2007.(1)
24
Table of Contents
Changes in the allowance for finance credit losses on finance receivables held for investment were as follows (in millions):
Six months ended | ||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 30.3 | $ | 27.3 | ||||
Provision for finance credit losses | 16.4 | 2.3 | ||||||
Charge-offs, net of recoveries | (10.8 | ) | (2.7 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 35.9 | $ | 26.9 | ||||
HDFS’ periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is generally based on HDFS’ past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, and current economic conditions. HDFS believes the allowance is adequate to cover estimated losses of principal in the existing portfolio.
Operating Expenses
The following table includes operating expenses for the Motorcycles segment and Corporate (in millions):
Six months ended | ||||||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | Increase | % Change | |||||||||
Motorcycles and Related Products | ||||||||||||
Selling & administrative | $ | 373.5 | $ | 319.9 | $ | 53.6 | 16.8 | % | ||||
Engineering | 86.9 | 86.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | ||||||||
Corporate | 12.8 | 11.5 | 1.3 | 11.8 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 473.2 | $ | 417.9 | $ | 55.3 | 13.2 | % | ||||
Total operating expenses, which include selling, administrative and engineering expenses, were 16.4% and 14.9% of net revenue for the first six months of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Selling and administrative expenses include an $11.5 million restructuring charge incurred by the Company during the first half of 2008 (see Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion). In addition, Selling and administrative expenses were higher due to increased warranty expense and higher international operating costs associated with the Company’s international growth and unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company’s effective income tax rate for the first half of 2008 was 36.0% compared to 35.5% in the same period last year. The increase was due to the expiration of the federal research and development tax credit as of December 31, 2007.
Other Matters
New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities. Entities will be required to provide enhanced disclosures about: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedge items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 161 beginning in fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the new disclosure requirements will have on its consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
25
Table of Contents
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, product and other matters. In determining required reserves related to these items, the Company carefully analyzes cases and considers the likelihood of adverse judgments or outcomes, as well as the potential range of possible loss. The required reserves are monitored on an ongoing basis and are updated based on new developments or new information in each matter.
Shareholder Lawsuits:
A number of shareholder class action lawsuits were filed between May 18, 2005 and July 1, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. On February 14, 2006, the court consolidated all of the actions into a single case, captionedIn re Harley-Davidson, Inc. Securities Litigation, and appointed Lead Plaintiffs and Co-Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel. Pursuant to the schedule set by the court, on October 2, 2006, the Lead Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint, which names the Company and Jeffrey L. Bleustein, James L. Ziemer, and James M. Brostowitz, who are current or former Company officers, as defendants. The Consolidated Complaint alleges securities law violations and seeks unspecified damages relating generally to the Company’s April 13, 2005 announcement that it was reducing short-term production growth and planned increases of motorcycle shipments from 317,000 units in 2004 to a new 2005 target of 329,000 units (compared to its original target of 339,000 units). On December 18, 2006, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint in its entirety. Briefing of the motion to dismiss was completed in April 2007.
Three shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on June 3, 2005, October 25, 2005 (this lawsuit was later voluntarily dismissed) and December 2, 2005 and two shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in Milwaukee County Circuit Court on July 22, 2005 and November 16, 2005 against some or all of the following current or former directors and officers of the Company: Jeffrey L. Bleustein, James L. Ziemer, James M. Brostowitz, Barry K. Allen, Richard I. Beattie, George H. Conrades, Judson C. Green, Donald A. James, Sara L. Levinson, George L. Miles, Jr., James A. Norling, James A. McCaslin, Donna F. Zarcone, Jon R. Flickinger, Gail A. Lione, Ronald M. Hutchinson, W. Kenneth Sutton, Jr. and John A. Hevey. The lawsuits also name the Company as a nominal defendant. In general, the shareholder derivative complaints include factual allegations similar to those in the class action complaints and allegations that officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company. On February 14, 2006, the state court consolidated the two state court derivative actions and appointed Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Plaintiffs’ counsel, and on April 24, 2006, the state court ordered that the consolidated state court derivative action be stayed until after motions to dismiss the federal securities class action are decided. On February 15, 2006, the federal court consolidated the federal derivative lawsuits with the securities and ERISA (see below) actions for administrative purposes. On February 1, 2007, the federal court appointed Lead Plaintiff and Co-Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel in the consolidated federal derivative action.
On August 25, 2005, a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. As noted above, on February 15, 2006, the court ordered the ERISA action consolidated with the federal derivative and securities actions for administrative purposes. Pursuant to the schedule set by the court, on October 2, 2006, the ERISA plaintiff filed an Amended Class Action Complaint, which named the Company, the Harley-Davidson Motor Company Retirement Plans Committee, the Company’s Leadership and Strategy Council, Harold A. Scott, James L. Ziemer, James M. Brostowitz, Gail A. Lione, Joanne M. Bischmann, Karl M. Eberle, Jon R. Flickinger, Ronald M. Hutchinson, James A. McCaslin, W. Kenneth Sutton, Jr., and Donna F. Zarcone, who are current or former Company officers or employees, as defendants. In general, the ERISA complaint includes factual allegations similar to those in the shareholder class action lawsuits and alleges on behalf of participants in certain Harley-Davidson retirement savings plans that the plan fiduciaries breached their ERISA fiduciary duties. On December 18, 2006, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the ERISA complaint in its entirety. Briefing of the motion to dismiss was completed in April 2007.
The Company believes the allegations against all of the defendants in the lawsuits against the Company are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend against them. Since all of these matters are in the preliminary stages, the Company is unable to predict
26
Table of Contents
the scope or outcome or quantify their eventual impact, if any, on the Company. At this time, the Company is also unable to estimate associated expenses or possible losses. The Company maintains insurance that may limit its financial exposure for defense costs and liability for an unfavorable outcome, should it not prevail, for claims covered by the insurance coverage.
Environmental Matters:
The Company is involved with government agencies and groups of potentially responsible parties in various environmental matters, including a matter involving the cleanup of soil and groundwater contamination at its York, Pennsylvania facility. The York facility was formerly used by the U.S. Navy and AMF prior to the purchase of the York facility by the Company from AMF in 1981. Although the Company is not certain as to the full extent of the environmental contamination at the York facility, it has been working with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) since 1986 in undertaking environmental investigation and remediation activities, including an ongoing site-wide remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS). In January 1995, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the Agreement) with the Navy. The Agreement calls for the Navy and the Company to contribute amounts into a trust equal to 53% and 47%, respectively, of future costs associated with environmental investigation and remediation activities at the York facility (Response Costs). The trust administers the payment of the Response Costs incurred at the York facility as covered by the Agreement.
In February 2002, the Company was advised by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that it considers some of the Company’s remediation activities at the York facility to be subject to the EPA’s corrective action program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and offered the Company the option of addressing corrective action under a RCRA facility lead agreement. In July 2005, the York facility was designated as the first site in Pennsylvania to be addressed under the “One Cleanup Program.” The program provides a more streamlined and efficient oversight of voluntary remediation by both PADEP and EPA and will be carried out consistent with the Agreement with the Navy. As a result, the RCRA facility lead agreement has been superseded.
Although the RI/FS is still underway and substantial uncertainty exists concerning the nature and scope of the additional environmental investigation and remediation that will ultimately be required at the York facility, the Company estimates that its share of the future Response Costs at the York facility will be approximately $6.7 million. The Company has established reserves for this amount, which are included in Accrued liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The estimate of the Company’s future Response Costs that will be incurred at the York facility is based on reports of independent environmental consultants retained by the Company, the actual costs incurred to date and the estimated costs to complete the necessary investigation and remediation activities. Response Costs related to the remediation of soil are expected to be incurred over a period of several years ending in 2012. Response Costs related to ground water remediation may continue for some time beyond 2012. However, these Response Costs are expected to be much lower than those related to the remediation of soil.
Under the terms of the sale of the Commercial Vehicles Division in 1996, the Company has agreed to indemnify Utilimaster Corporation, until December 2008, for certain claims related to environmental contamination present at the date of sale, up to $20.0 million. Based on the environmental studies performed, the Company does not expect to incur any material expenditures under this indemnification.
Product Liability Matters:
Additionally, the Company is involved in product liability suits related to the operation of its business. The Company accrues for claim exposures that are probable of occurrence and can be reasonably estimated. The Company also maintains insurance coverage for product liability exposures. The Company believes that its accruals and insurance coverage are adequate and that product liability will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
27
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources as of June 29, 2008
The Company expects that its business model will continue to generate cash that will allow it to invest in the business, fund future growth opportunities and return value to shareholders.(1) The Company also has a securitization program, a commercial paper program, credit facilities and debt instruments in place to support the ongoing cash requirements of its Financial Services business. The Company regularly assesses its long-term capital market strategy, which includes diversifying funding sources in the capital markets to provide the Company with the appropriate level of flexibility to fund the business and to adjust to market conditions as necessary. Although the debt capital markets remain challenging, the Company believes that HDFS will continue to have access to the securitization, term note and bank debt markets in the future.(1)
Cash Flow Activity
The following table summarizes the operating, investing and financing cash flow activity for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Six months ended | ||||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||
Net cash (used by) provided by operating activities | $ | (39,016 | ) | $ | 1,062,455 | |||
Net cash (used by) provided by investing activities | (151,143 | ) | 243,156 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used by) financing activities | 579,192 | (1,120,190 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 389,033 | $ | 185,421 | ||||
Operating Activities
The decrease in operating cash flow from the first half of 2007 to the first half of 2008 was due primarily to lower securitization proceeds. Proceeds from the sale of retail finance receivables resulted in cash inflows of $467.7 million and $1.74 billion during the first six months of 2008 and 2007, respectively. During the first half of 2008, HDFS funded a greater percentage of its business with proceeds from commercial paper and medium-term notes than it did in the same period last year.
Investing Activities
The Company’s investing activities consist primarily of capital expenditures, net changes in finance receivables held for investment and short-term investment activity.
Capital expenditures were $99.6 million and $86.0 million during the first six months of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company estimates that total capital expenditures for 2008 will be in the range of $235.0 million to $250.0 million.(1) The Company anticipates it will have the ability to fund all capital expenditures in 2008 with internally generated funds.(1)
Sales and redemptions of marketable securities (net of purchases) in the first six months of 2008 resulted in cash inflow of $2.0 million compared to $352.5 million in the first six months of 2007. The year over year decline in cash inflow from marketable securities is a result of the Company reducing its investment in marketable securities over the previous twelve months, generally for the purpose of funding share repurchases.
Financing Activities
The Company’s financing activities consist primarily of share repurchases, stock issuances, dividend payments and finance debt activity. During the first half of 2008, the Company repurchased 3.8 million shares of its common stock at a total cost of $150.1 million. The Company repurchased 3.1 million of these shares under a general authorization provided by the Company’s Board of Directors in October 2006 to buy back 20.0 million shares. As of June 29, 2008, no shares remained under this authorization. The remaining 0.7 million shares were repurchased under an authorization granted by the Company’s Board of Directors in December 2007, which separately authorized the Company to buy back up to 20.0 million shares of its common stock. In addition, the Company also has an authorization from the Company’s Board of Directors that is designed to provide the Company with continuing authority to repurchase shares to offset dilution caused by the exercise of stock options and the issuance of nonvested stock. Please see Part II, Item 2 “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds” for additional details regarding the Company’s share repurchase activity and authorizations.
28
Table of Contents
The Company paid dividends of $0.63 per share at a total cost of $148.6 million during the first six months of 2008, compared to dividends of $0.46 per share at a total cost of $116.7 million during the same period last year.
In addition to operating cash flows and proceeds from asset-backed securitizations, HDFS currently is financed by the issuance of commercial paper, borrowings under revolving credit facilities, medium-term notes and borrowings from the Company. During the period ended June 29, 2008, finance debt increased by $1.80 billion which was driven by higher finance receivables outstanding as HDFS elected to fund a greater percentage of its business through debt rather than through securitization transactions when compared to the first six months of 2007. HDFS’ outstanding debt consisted of the following as of June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007 (in millions):
Six months ended | ||||||
June 29, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | |||||
Commercial paper | $ | 756.9 | $ | 368.2 | ||
Credit facilities | 218.3 | 194.7 | ||||
975.2 | 562.9 | |||||
Medium-term notes | 2,002.7 | 586.9 | ||||
Senior subordinated notes | — | 30.0 | ||||
Total finance debt | $ | 2,977.9 | $ | 1,179.8 | ||
Credit Facilities – In February 2008, HDFS entered into a $300.0 million credit facility in addition to its existing $1.40 billion credit facility (collectively, Global Credit Facilities). Under the Global Credit Facilities, subject to certain limitations, HDFS has the option to borrow in various currencies. Interest is based on London interbank offered rates (LIBOR), European interbank offered rates or other short-term indices, depending on the type of advance. The Global Credit Facilities are committed facilities. The $1.40 billion facility is due in September 2009. The $300.0 million facility is due on the earlier of December 15, 2008 or the date HDFS refinances its $1.40 billion credit facility. HDFS pays a fee for the availability of the Global Credit Facilities.
On July 16, 2008, the Company and HDFS entered into new credit facilities totaling $1.90 billion. These facilities, a $950.0 million 364-day facility and a $950.0 million three-year facility, replace the existing $1.70 billion Global Credit Facilities. The primary use of these new facilities is to support HDFS’ commercial paper program and to fund HDFS’ lending activities and other operations. Borrowings under each new credit facility will bear interest at various variable rates, which may be adjusted upward or downward depending on whether certain criteria are satisfied. As a result of these new facilities, HDFS may issue commercial paper of up to $1.90 billion in the aggregate.
Commercial Paper – Subject to limitations, HDFS could issue commercial paper of up to $1.70 billion of as of June 29, 2008 and $1.90 billion beginning on July 16, 2008. Maturities may range up to 365 days from the issuance date. Outstanding commercial paper may not exceed the unused portion of the Global Credit Facilities. As a result, the combined total of commercial paper and borrowings under the Global Credit Facilities was limited to $1.90 billion subsequent to July 16, 2008 and $1.70 billion as of June 29, 2008.
Medium-Term Notes – In May 2008, HDFS issued $1.00 billion of 6.80% medium-term notes due in June 2018. HDFS also has $400.0 million of 3.63% medium-term notes outstanding which are due in December 2008, $200.0 million of 5.00% medium-term notes due in December 2010, and $400.0 million of 5.25% medium-term notes due in December 2012 (all four issuances are collectively referred to as “Notes”). The Notes provide for semi-annual interest payments and principal due at maturity. As of June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, the Notes included a fair value adjustment increasing the balance by $5.0 million and reducing the balance by $13.0 million, respectively, due to interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges. The effect of the interest rate swap agreements is to convert the interest rate on the Notes from a fixed to a floating rate, which is based on 3-month LIBOR.
29
Table of Contents
Senior Subordinated Debt – At July 1, 2007, HDFS had $30.0 million of 6.79% senior subordinated notes outstanding which were due in December 2007. In December 2007, the notes matured and the principal and accrued interest was paid in full.
Intercompany Borrowing – HDFS has a revolving credit line with the Company whereby HDFS may borrow up to $210.0 million from the Company at a market interest rate. As of June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, HDFS had no outstanding borrowings owed to the Company under this agreement.
The Company has a support agreement with HDFS whereby, if required, the Company agrees to provide HDFS with financial support in order to maintain certain financial covenants. Support may be provided at the Company’s option as capital contributions or loans. Accordingly, certain debt covenants may restrict the Company’s ability to withdraw funds from HDFS outside the normal course of business. No amount has ever been provided to HDFS under the support agreement.
Operating and Financial Covenants – HDFS is subject to various operating and financial covenants related to the Global Credit Facilities, the new credit facilities entered into on July 16, 2008 and Notes. The more significant covenants are described below.
The covenants limit HDFS’ ability to:
• | incur certain additional indebtedness; |
• | assume or incur certain liens; |
• | participate in a merger, consolidation, liquidation or dissolution; and |
• | purchase or hold margin stock. |
Under the Global Credit Facilities financial covenants, the debt to equity ratio of HDFS and its consolidated subsidiaries cannot exceed 9.0 to 1.0 and HDFS must maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth of $300.0 million. No financial covenants are required under the Notes.
At June 29, 2008, HDFS remained in compliance with all of the existing covenants.
Under the new credit facilities entered into on July 16, 2008, HDFS will be required to maintain a debt to equity ratio of 10.0 to 1.0 and the Company an interest ratio coverage of 2.5 to 1.0. The minimum required HDFS consolidated tangible net worth remains at $300.0 million. The operational covenants did not significantly change relative to those under the Global Credit Facilities.
The Company expects that future activities of HDFS will be financed from funds internally generated by HDFS, the sale of loans through securitization programs, issuance of commercial paper and medium-term notes, borrowings under revolving credit facilities and advances or loans from the Company.(1) The Company will continue to evaluate various funding alternatives, and will adjust as necessary, based on market conditions.(1)
Cautionary Statements
The Company’s ability to meet the targets and expectations noted depends upon, among other factors, the Company’s ability to (i) continue to realize production efficiencies at its production facilities and manage operating costs including materials, labor and overhead; (ii) manage production capacity and production changes; (iii) manage supply chain issues; (iv) provide products, services and experiences that are successful in the marketplace; (v) develop and implement sales and marketing plans that retain existing retail customers and attract new retail customers in an increasingly competitive marketplace; (vi) sell all of its motorcycles and related products and services to its independent dealers; (vii) continue to develop the capabilities of its distributor and dealer network; (viii) manage changes and prepare for requirements in legislative and regulatory environments for its products, services and operations; (ix) adjust to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices; (x) manage access to reliable sources of capital and adjust to fluctuations in the cost of capital; (xi) adjust to regional and worldwide demographic trends and economic and political conditions, including healthcare inflation, pension reform and tax changes; (xii) anticipate consumer confidence in the economy; (xiii) manage the credit quality, the loan servicing and collection activities, and the recovery rates of
30
Table of Contents
HDFS’ loan portfolio; (xiv) retain and attract talented employees; (xv) detect any issues with our motorcycles or manufacturing processes to avoid delays in new model launches, recall campaigns, increased warranty costs or litigation; (xvi) implement and manage enterprise-wide information technology solutions and secure data contained in those systems; and (xvii) successfully implement the workforce reduction plan that the Company announced in April 2008 in a manner consistent with expected timelines and costs. Assuming the agreement to purchase MV Agusta Group is consummated in a timely manner, Harley-Davidson may have challenges successfully integrating and profitably operating it.
In addition, the Company could experience delays or disruptions in its operations as a result of work stoppages, strikes, natural causes, terrorism or other factors. Other factors are described in risk factors that the Company has disclosed in documents previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Company’s ability to sell its motorcycles and related products and services and to meet its financial expectations also depends on the ability of the Company’s independent dealers to sell its motorcycles and related products and services to retail customers. The Company depends on the capability and financial capacity of its independent dealers and distributors to develop and implement effective retail sales plans to create demand for the motorcycles and related products and services they purchase from the Company.
In addition, the Company’s independent dealers and distributors may experience difficulties in selling Harley-Davidson motorcycles and related products and services as a result of weather, economic conditions or other factors.
Refer to “Risk Factors” under Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a discussion of additional factors and a more complete discussion of some of the cautionary statements noted above.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a complete discussion of the Company’s market risk. There have been no material changes to the market risk information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year December 31, 2007.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 29, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
31
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
The information required under this Item 1 of Part II is contained in Item 1 of Part 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in Note 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and such information is incorporated herein by reference in this Item 1 of Part II.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
Refer to Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a discussion regarding risk factors relating to the Company. There have been no material changes to the risk factors included in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
The following table contains detail related to the repurchase of common stock based on the date of trade during the quarter ended June 29, 2008:
2008 Fiscal Month | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |||||
March 31 to April 4 | 146 | $ | 39 | — | 25,034,602 | ||||
April 5 to May 1 | 1,252,671 | 40 | 1,252,399 | 23,783,203 | |||||
May 2 to June 29 | 228 | 42 | — | 23,786,167 | |||||
Total | 1,253,045 | $ | 40 | 1,252,399 | |||||
The Company has an authorization (originally adopted in December 1997) by its Board of Directors to repurchase shares of its outstanding common stock under which the cumulative number of shares repurchased, at the time of any repurchase, shall not exceed the sum of (1) the number of shares issued in connection with the exercise of stock options or grants of nonvested stock occurring on or after January 1, 2004 plus (2) one percent of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company on January 1 of the current year, adjusted for any stock split. The Company did not repurchase any shares under this authorization during the quarter ended June 29, 2008.
Of the total shares repurchased during the second quarter of 2008, 0.5 million shares were repurchased under an authorization granted by the Company’s Board of Directors during October 2006, which separately authorized the Company to buy back up to 20.0 million shares of its common stock with no dollar limit or expiration date. No shares remain under this authorization as of June 29, 2008.
The remaining 0.7 million shares that were repurchased during the second quarter of 2008 were repurchased under an authorization granted by the Company’s Board of Directors in December 2007, which separately authorized the Company to buy back up to 20.0 million of its common stock with no dollar limit or expiration date. As of June 29, 2008, 19.3 million shares remained under this authorization.
32
Table of Contents
The Harley-Davidson, Inc. 2004 Incentive Stock Plan permits participants to satisfy all or a portion of the federal, state and local withholding tax obligations arising in connection with plan awards by electing to (a) have the Company withhold shares otherwise issuable under the award; (b) tender back shares received in connection with such award; or (c) deliver other previously owned shares, in each case having a value equal to the amount to be withheld. The Company acquired 646 shares under this plan during the quarter ended June 29, 2008.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
(a) The Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on April 26, 2008.
(b) At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the following directors were elected for terms expiring in 2011 by the vote indicated:
Shares Voted in Favor of | Shares Withholding Authority | |||
George H. Conrades | 142,721,014 | 36,579,015 | ||
Sara L. Levinson | 156,748,841 | 22,551,188 | ||
George L. Miles, Jr. | 173,255,837 | 6,044,192 | ||
Jochen Zeitz | 173,486,216 | 5,813,813 |
The directors whose terms of office as directors continued after the meeting were Barry K. Allen, Richard I. Beattie, Jeffrey L. Bleustein, Judson C. Green, Donald A. James, James A. Norling and James L. Ziemer.
(c) Matters other than election of directors, brought for vote at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders, passed by the vote indicated:
Shares Voted For | Shares Voted Against | Shares Withheld | Broker Non-Votes | |||||
Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors | 170,418,520 | 824,780 | 8,056,829 | — |
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Refer to the Exhibit Index on page 35 of this report.
33
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC. | ||
Date: July 31, 2008 | /s/ Thomas E. Bergmann | |
Thomas E. Bergmann | ||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
(Principal financial and accounting officer) |
34
Table of Contents
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.
Exhibit Index to Form 10-Q
Exhibit No. | Description | |
31.1 | Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | |
31.2 | Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | |
32.1 | Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 |
35