UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-04782
HSBC FUNDS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
452 FIFTH AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
CITI FUND SERVICES
3435 STELZER ROAD
COLUMBUS, OH 43219
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-800-782-8183
Date of fiscal year end: October 31
Date of reporting period: April 30, 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75c7c/75c7cda1f223d5f7ece6dbd4fbcacceb07822b20" alt=""
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. April 30, 2012 |
HSBC Funds
Semi-Annual Report
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
HSBC Growth Fund | | HOTAX | | HOTBX | | HOTCX | | HOTYX |
HSBC Opportunity Fund | | HSOAX | | HOPBX | | HOPCX | | RESCX |
HSBC Family of Funds
Semi-Annual Report - April 30, 2012
Glossary of Terms | |
Chairman’s Message | 4 |
President’s Message | 6 |
Commentary From the Investment Manager | 7 |
Portfolio Reviews | 8 |
Portfolio Composition | 12 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | 14 |
Statements of Operations | 15 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 16 |
Financial Highlights | 20 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 23 |
Investment Adviser Contract Approval | 31 |
Table of Shareholder Expenses | 34 |
|
HSBC Portfolios | |
Schedules of Portfolio Investments | |
HSBC Growth Portfolio | 35 |
HSBC Opportunity Portfolio | 37 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | 39 |
Statements of Operations | 40 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 41 |
Financial Highlights | 42 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 43 |
Investment Adviser Contract Approval | 48 |
Table of Shareholder Expenses | 51 |
Other Information | 52 |
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index generally representative of investment-grade, fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year.
Barclays Capital U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index is an unmanaged index that measures the non-investment grade, USD-denominated, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high-yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. The index excludes emerging markets debt.
Lipper Large-Cap Growth Funds Average is an equally weighted average of mutual funds that, by portfolio practice, invest at least 75% of their equity assets in companies with market capitalizations (on a three-year weighted basis) above Lipper’s U.S. Diversified Equity large-cap floor. Large-cap growth funds typically have an above-average price-to-earnings ratio, price-to-book ratio, and three-year sales-per-share growth value, compared to the S&P 500 Index.
Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds Average is an equally weighted average of mutual funds that, by portfolio practice, invest at least 75% of their equity assets in companies with market capitalizations (on a three-year weighted basis) below Lipper’s U.S. Diversified Equity large-cap floor. Mid-cap growth funds typically have an above-average price-to-earnings ratio, price-to-book ratio, and three-year sales-per-share growth value, compared to the S&P MidCap 400 Index.
Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is an unmanaged free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of the following 22 developed market countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets (“MSCI EM”) Index is an unmanaged free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. The MSCI EM Index consists of the following 21 emerging market countries: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey.
Russell 1000® Growth Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the large-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
Russell 2500™ Growth Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the small- to mid-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 2500 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index is an unmanaged index that is widely regarded as a gauge of the U.S. equities market. This index includes 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. The S&P 500 Index focuses on the large-cap segment of the market, with approximately 75% coverage of U.S. equities.
Lipper is an independent mutual fund performance monitor whose results are based on total return and do not reflect a sales charge.
Securities indices assume reinvestment of all distributions and interest payments and do not take in account brokerage fees or expenses. Securities in the Funds do not match those in the indices and performance of the Funds will differ. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
June 11, 2012
To Our Investors:
Investors today face a number of troubling macroeconomic issues, including a U.S. economy still struggling to recover from the widespread global downturn that began more than four years ago. Despite modest improvements in certain areas, such as the housing market and corporate profits, the economy still faced major headwinds, particularly from continued weakness in the U.S. job market. A lack of clarity on the economic outlook has led to considerable volatility in the markets: Stocks seem to rally strongly one week only to falter and shed those gains the following week. Meanwhile, conservative assets such as Treasury and money market securities have seen yields fall to historically low levels. These low yields are due in part to Federal Reserve actions designed to keep interest rates low in hopes of jumpstarting the economy.
Europe’s debt woes also are a significant source of worry for investors today. Concerns are mounting that efforts by the European Central Bank and eurozone governments to rein in the region’s debt crisis have been insufficient, and that the specter of economic recession and even default continues to loom over the region. Meanwhile governments in Europe face pressures to address their debt issues while curbing spending. It is unclear how the European debt crisis will play out, but we expect that it may take several years for these issues to unwind.
We are keeping a close watch on potential regulatory changes in the money markets. In response to a period of market illiquidity and disruptions in 2008, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has engaged in an ongoing examination of the money market fund model to determine whether changes are needed. That initiative led to rule changes in 2010, and the possibility of more changes to protect money market funds from the risk of broad-based, large-scale redemptions. Two options under consideration would impose capital requirements and limitations or fees on redemptions, among other restrictions.
The money market fund industry has expressed concerns with these proposals, and it appears that there is insufficient support for additional money market fund reforms among the five SEC commissioners. However, there is the possibility that the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) may intervene in the matter if the SEC does not adopt additional reforms. Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, who is a member of the FSOC, recently expressed his support for increased regulation of money market funds.
At this point, it is not possible to predict where this debate will end and what reform, if any, will ultimately be adopted. We will continue to monitor reform proposals as we work to provide the best money market fund structures and products to meet the needs of our shareholders.
Assets in our money market funds continue to decline due in large part to the historically low yields available in the money markets. HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc., the Funds’ investment advisor, along with the Funds’ other service providers provided yield support of approximately $9.9 million, during the six months’ ended April 30, 2012, to the HSBC Money Market Funds.
4 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Chairman’s Message (continued) |
We are pleased to introduce two new funds in this semi-annual report. The HSBC World Selection Income Strategy Fund and the HSBC Total Return Fund. The Income Strategy Fund seeks to provide current income by investing primarily in underlying funds by utilizing a “fund of funds” structure. The Total Return Fund seeks to maximize total return which is comprised of capital appreciation and income. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing its assets in issuers that are economically tied to emerging market countries.
During the period, due to small asset bases and dwindling investor demand, we liquidated the HSBC Investor Value Fund, the HSBC Investor International Equity and the HSBC Investor Overseas Equity Fund. We continue to review the fund offerings of the HSBC Fund Family to meet the needs of our clients.
Cordially,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b00e/7b00e6d59e7d6f47bee6c2ff0b4b296e017a4c43" alt=""
Michael Seely
Chairman, HSBC Funds
This literature must be preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus for the HSBC Funds. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment company carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company. To obtain more information, for clients of HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., please call 1-888-525-5757 or visit www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com. For other investors and prospective investors, please call the Funds directly at 1-888-936-4722 or visit or www.emfunds.us.hsbc.com. Investors should read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 5
Dear Shareholder,
Welcome to the HSBC Funds semi-annual report, covering the period between November 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012. This report offers detailed information about your Funds’ investment results. We encourage you to review it carefully.
Inside these pages you will find a letter from the Funds’ Chairman, Michael Seely, in which he comments on recent market developments. The report also includes commentary from the Funds’ portfolio managers in which they discuss the investment markets and their respective Fund’s performance. Each commentary may also be accompanied by the Fund’s return for the period, listed alongside the returns of its benchmark index and peer group average for comparative purposes.
On March 20 of this year we launched the World Selection Income Strategy Fund. This Fund adds an income-oriented strategy to the World Selection suite of funds, which includes the Aggressive Strategy, Balanced Strategy, Moderate Strategy, and Conservative Strategy Funds.
On March 30, we also launched the HSBC Total Return Fund. The launch of this fund further expands on our offerings in the emerging markets – one of HSBC’s core strengths. The Total Return Fund joins the Emerging Markets Debt Fund, the Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund, and the Frontier Markets Fund as our initial fund offerings in this exciting segment of the investment market
In closing, we would like to thank you for investing through the HSBC Funds. We continue to focus the HSBC Fund Family on long-term investment solutions to assist our customers in reaching their financial goals. We appreciate the trust you place in us, and will continue working to earn it. Please contact us at any time with questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b58f6/b58f600b8e6248150175efa5867d28eea323ff31" alt=""
Richard A. Fabietti
President
6 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Commentary From the Investment Manager |
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc.
U.S. Economic Review
The global economy’s recovery from a historic downturn regained momentum during the six-month period between November 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012 after slowing throughout much of 2011. Moderate economic growth was fueled by increased consumer confidence, improved U.S. economic data, continued strength in emerging economies and better-than-expected corporate earnings. The economic recovery continued to benefit from the Federal Reserve Board’s pledge to maintain the federal funds rate—a key factor in lending rates—at a historically low target range between 0.00% and 0.25% through 2014.
As the period began, ongoing concerns about the eurozone debt crisis continued to fuel fears of a new global recession. However, financial markets underwent a significant shift from the volatile and bearish events of the previous six months. Fears about Europe began to subside somewhat during the first months of 2012, due in part to efforts by the European Central Bank (ECB) to stabilize the region’s banking system through infusions of capital. Meanwhile, moderate economic growth in the U.S. and, although slowing, still relatively strong growth in emerging markets helped assuage fears of a global economic downturn.
The ECB efforts to stem a liquidity crisis in European nations during the period helped alleviate fears of deepening credit problems in the eurozone. In December, the ECB began distributing inexpensive loans to European banks as part of its long-term refinancing operation (LTRO) and in March began making similar loans from an even larger pool of funds. The LTRO appeared to stabilize financial markets in the short term, but significant uncertainties remained regarding the long-term prospects of peripheral European economies to regain their competitiveness and avoid the threat of defaults. The ability of countries such as Italy, Greece and Spain to regain the confidence of the markets remained in doubt, and the long-term impact of austerity programs on economic growth also raised concerns.
Growth remained robust in many emerging economies during the period, and inflation, which had been a significant concern in previous months, eased in some nations. Economic growth in China slowed due to declining exports and industrial production as well as low levels of lending. But most signs indicated that robust domestic demand would prevent a “hard landing” for the Chinese economy. Oil prices eased somewhat during the period.
U.S. Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”)1 grew at 3.0% during the fourth quarter of 2011, a significant increase from the previous quarter. A preliminary estimate puts GDP during the first quarter at 1.9%. Job creation was robust during much of the period, and jobless claims continued a generally downward trend. However, unemployment remained relatively high. The housing market showed signs of improvement. Home sales began to stabilize and inventories began to decrease. Meanwhile, encouraging economic data bolstered the recovery. Reports showed that motor vehicle sales were strong, U.S. exports had accelerated and industrial production had increased.
Market Review
The period began with the final stretch of a sell-off in U.S. equity markets that had begun in mid-summer. After bottoming out in late November, equities changed direction with a strong rally that persisted through the duration of the period. Equities’ strong performance during the period was supported by increased optimism that the U.S. would avoid a “double dip” recession—a threat that preoccupied investors in 2011. During the period, stocks in cyclical sectors tended to perform best, while more defensive sectors lagged behind.
Stocks in other developed economies rose, too. Japanese equities performed especially well due to a strong economic rebound during the first quarter of 2012. European stocks made gains, but lagged behind U.S. markets. The S&P 500 Index1 of large-company stocks returned 12.77% for the six months ended April 2012. The MSCI EAFE Index1 of developed foreign markets returned 2.71% for the period as a whole, while the MSCI EM Index1 returned 4.02%.
Among fixed-income securities, yields on U.S. Treasury bonds increased during the period, sending prices lower. Investment grade corporate bonds showed strength, as investors sought additional yield in a low interest rate environment. High-yield bonds performed especially well as their yield spread over U.S. Treasuries declined during the period. Fixed-income markets in emerging economies performed well, as investors became more confident in the credit worthiness of emerging nations and were attracted to the additional yield of such securities. The Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, which tracks the broad investment-grade fixed-income market, returned 2.44% for the six months ended April 30, 2012, while the Barclays Capital U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index1 returned 6.91%.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 7
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Growth Fund
(Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares and Class I Shares)
by Clark J. Winslow, CEO and CIO/Portfolio Manager
Justin H. Kelly, CFA, Senior Managing Director/Portfolio Manager
R. Bartlett Wear, CFA, Senior Managing Director/Portfolio Manager
Winslow Capital Management, Inc.
The HSBC Growth Fund (the “Fund”) seeks long-term growth of capital. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests primarily in U.S. and foreign equity securities of high quality companies with market capitalization generally in excess of $2 billion, which the subadviser believes have the potential to generate superior levels of long-term profitability and growth. The Fund utilizes a two-tier structure, commonly known as a “master-feeder” structure, in which the Fund invests all of its investable assets in the HSBC Growth Portfolio (the “Portfolio”). The Portfolio employs Winslow Capital Management, Inc. as its subadviser.
Investment Concerns
Equity securities (stocks) are more volatile and carry more risk than other forms of investments, including investments in high-grade fixed income securities.
The growth investment style may fall out of favor in the marketplace and result in significant declines in the value of the Portfolio’s securities. Securities of companies considered to be growth investments may have rapid price swings in the event of earnings disappointments or during periods of market, political, regulatory and economics uncertainty.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Market Commentary
The Fund returned 12.54% (without sales charge) for the Class A Shares and 12.66% for the Class I Shares for the six-months ended April 30, 2012. That compared to a 14.13% total return for the Russell 1000® Growth Index1, the Fund’s primary performance benchmark, and a 12.89% total return for the Lipper Large-Cap Growth Funds Average1.
Portfolio Performance
The U.S. and global equity markets performed well during the six-month period ended April 30, 2012 as investors became increasingly convinced of the strength and continuity of the U.S. economic recovery. The U.S. economy posted 26 weeks of improved economic data during the period under review, which helped buoy investor confidence. Meanwhile, investor concerns about the European debt crisis were alleviated somewhat by a $1 trillion long-term financing option put forth by the European Central Bank in December.
Stocks performed well in that environment, and the Fund benefited in absolute terms from the increased confidence among investors. However, the Fund underperformed its benchmark primarily because of individual stock selection. The Fund’s holdings in the information technology and industrial sectors were among the largest performance detractors. Individual holdings that performed poorly included a global IT consultant, a heavy machinery company, and a third-party logistics provider.*
The Fund benefited in relative terms from its individual holdings in the telecommunications and health care sectors. Although the Fund held an underweight in the health care sector relative to its benchmark, it benefited from strong stock selection. Strong performers during the period included a global health care company and a surgical robot manufacturer.*
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
8 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Growth Fund
| | | | | | | Average Annual | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Ratio (%)66 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | Since | | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Inception | | Gross | | Net |
HSBC Growth Fund Class A1 | | 5/7/04 | 5 | | 6.93 | | -0.85 | | 4.64 | | 6.37 | | | 1.30 | | 1.19 |
HSBC Growth Fund Class B2 | | 5/7/04 | 5 | | 8.10 | | -0.46 | | 4.91 | | 6.44 | | | 2.05 | | 1.94 |
HSBC Growth Fund Class C3 | | 5/7/04 | 5 | | 11.08 | | 2.58 | | 4.92 | | 6.25 | | | 2.05 | | 1.94 |
HSBC Growth Fund Class I | | 5/7/04 | 5 | | 12.66 | | 4.64 | | 5.97 | | 7.31 | | | 1.05 | | 0.94 |
Russell 1000® Growth Index4 | | — | | 14.13 | | 7.26 | | 4.11 | | 6.09 | 7 | | N/A | | N/A |
Lipper Large-Cap Growth Funds Average4 | | — | | 12.89 | | 4.71 | | 2.97 | | 5.20 | 8 | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect the taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower.
Certain returns shown include monies received by the Portfolio, in which the Fund invests, in respect of one-time class action settlements and a one-time reimbursement from HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”) to the Fund related to past marketing arrangements. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Portfolio and the Fund not received the payments.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | Reflects the maximum sales charge of 5.00%. |
2 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge maximum of 4.00%. |
3 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge maximum of 1.00%. |
4 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
5 | The HSBC Growth Fund was initially offered for purchase effective May 7, 2004, however, no shareholder activity occurred until May 10, 2004. |
6 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. The Adviser has entered into an investment advisory agreement with the Portfolio under which it may pay the Adviser (who, in turn, pays the subadviser, Winslow Capital Management, Inc. (the “Subadviser”)) an aggregate management fee of up to 0.68% of the average daily value of the Portfolio’s net assets. Currently, the Portfolio is paying the Adviser 0.175%. The Adviser’s share of the aggregate management fee is capped at 0.175%. The Subadviser’s share of the aggregate management fee is set by contract between the Adviser and the Subadviser. The Adviser’s and Subadviser’s fees currently aggregate to 0.575%. The contract between the Adviser and Subadviser may be terminated at any time without penalty upon 30 days’ written notice to the Subadviser by the Adviser or the Portfolio upon the vote of a majority of the Trustees, or by the Subadviser upon 30 days’ written notice to the Portfolio or Adviser. Additional information pertaining to the April 30, 2012 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights. |
7 | Return for the period May 10, 2004 to April 30, 2012. |
8 | Return for the period April 30, 2004 to April 30, 2012. |
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Russell 1000® Growth Index, an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the large-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The performance of the index does not reflect the deduction of expenses associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 9
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Opportunity Fund (Advisor)
(Class I Shares)
HSBC Opportunity Fund
(Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares)
by William A. Muggia, President, CEO and CIO/Portfolio Manager
Matthew W. Strobeck, Partner/Portfolio Manager
Ethan J. Meyers, Partner/Portfolio Manager
John M. Montgomery, Partner
D. Hamlen Thompson, Partner
Westfield Capital Management Company, L.P.
The HSBC Opportunity Fund and HSBC Opportunity Fund (Advisor) (collectively the “Fund”) seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in equity securities of small and mid-cap companies. Small and mid-cap companies generally are defined as those that have market capitalizations within the range of market capitalizations represented in the Russell 2500™ Growth Index. The Fund may also invest in equity securities of larger, more established companies and may invest up to 20% of its assets in securities of foreign companies. The Fund employs a two-tier structure, commonly referred to as a “master-feeder” structure, in which the Fund invests all of its investable assets in the HSBC Opportunity Portfolio (the “Portfolio”). The Portfolio employs Westfield Capital Management Company, L.P. as its subadviser.
Investment Concerns
Equity securities (stocks) are more volatile and carry more risk than other forms of investments, including investments in high-grade fixed income securities.
Small to mid-capitalization funds typically carry additional risks since smaller companies generally have a higher risk of failure, and historically, their stocks have experienced a greater degree of market volatility than stocks on average.
The growth investment style may fall out of favor in the marketplace and result in significant declines in the value of the Portfolio’s securities. Securities of companies considered to be growth investments may have rapid price swings in the event of earnings disappointments or during periods of market, political, regulatory and economics uncertainty.
There are risks associated with investing in foreign companies, such as erratic market conditions, economic and political instability and fluctuations in currency and exchange rates.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Market Commentary
For the six-months ended April 30, 2012, the Class I Shares of the HSBC Opportunity Fund (Advisor) produced a 13.59% total return, and the Class A Shares of the Fund produced a 13.40% total return (without sales charge). The Russell 2500™ Growth Index1, the Fund’s primary performance benchmark, and the Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds Average1 returned 11.72% and 11.27%, respectively.
Portfolio Performance
Investor confidence rose early in the period due to several factors, including a more accommodative monetary policy and a strengthening U.S. economy. Near the beginning of the six-month period, housing prices were improving, unemployment levels were falling, consumer credit was expanding and small-business owners were increasingly optimistic. That boost in investor confidence led to a near-historic rally in the first three months of the year, which contributed to the Fund’s strong absolute performance during the period.
For the six-month period ended April 30, 2012, the Fund (Class I Shares) outperformed its benchmark largely due to individual stock selection. In particular, the Fund benefited from the performance of an equipment rental services provider, an electrical products provider, a specialty athletics retailer and an automotive aftermarket parts retailer. Strong stock selection in the information technology and materials sectors also boosted the Fund’s relative performance during the period.*
However, the Fund’s holdings in the health care and telecommunication services sectors detracted from its relative performance. In one case, shares of a Latin American mobile communications provider performed poorly as the company posted quarterly earnings that were below analysts’ expectations.*
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
10 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Opportunity Fund
| | | | | | Average Annual | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Ratio (%)55 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | 10 | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Year | | Gross | | Net |
HSBC Opportunity Fund Class A1 | | 9/23/96 | | 7.73 | | -7.56 | | 5.71 | | 7.57 | | 1.85 | | 1.65 |
HSBC Opportunity Fund Class B2 | | 1/6/98 | | 9.26 | | -6.65 | | 5.99 | | 7.63 | | 2.60 | | 2.40 |
HSBC Opportunity Fund Class C3 | | 11/4/98 | | 11.97 | | -4.33 | | 6.01 | | 7.31 | | 2.60 | | 2.40 |
HSBC Opportunity Fund Class I† | | 9/3/96 | | 13.59 | | -2.24 | | 7.14 | | 8.60 | | 1.01 | | 1.01 |
Russell 2500™ Growth Index4 | | — | | 11.72 | | -1.61 | | 4.08 | | 7.26 | | N/A | | N/A |
Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds Average4 | | — | | 11.27 | | -1.85 | | 3.39 | | 6.31 | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect the taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower. Currently, contractual fee waivers are in effect for the Fund through March 1, 2013 for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares.
Certain returns shown include monies received by the Portfolio, in which the Fund invests, in respect of one-time class action settlements and a one-time reimbursement from HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”) to the Fund related to past marketing arrangements. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Portfolio and the Fund not received the payments.
† The Class I Shares are issued by a series of HSBC Advisor Funds Trust, also named the HSBC Opportunity Fund.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | Reflects the maximum sales charge of 5.00%. |
2 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 4.00%. |
3 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 1.00%. |
4 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
5 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. The Adviser has entered into a contractual expense limitation agreement with the Fund under which it will limit total expenses of the Fund (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, extraordinary expenses and estimated indirect expenses attributable to the Fund’s investments in investment companies other than the Portfolio) to an annual rate of 1.65%, 2.40%, and 2.40% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, and Class C Shares, respectively. The expense limitation shall be in effect until March 1, 2013. Additional information pertaining to the April 30, 2012 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights. |
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Russell 2500™ Growth Index, an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the small- to mid-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 2500 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The performance for the index does not reflect the deduction of expenses associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 11
Portfolio Composition*
April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
HSBC Growth Portfolio | | |
| | Percentage of |
Investment Allocation | | Investments at Value(%) |
Computers & Peripherals | | 9.7 |
Software | | 7.3 |
Internet Software & Services | | 7.0 |
IT Services | | 6.5 |
Machinery | | 5.5 |
Internet & Catalog Retail | | 4.9 |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | | 4.7 |
Health Care Providers & Services | | 4.6 |
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | | 4.0 |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | | 3.5 |
Communications Equipment | | 3.4 |
Road & Rail | | 3.4 |
Chemicals | | 3.3 |
Capital Markets | | 3.3 |
Aerospace & Defense | | 2.8 |
Diversified Financial Services | | 2.8 |
Biotechnology | | 2.7 |
Investment Companies | | 2.6 |
Energy Equipment & Services | | 2.6 |
Food & Staples Retailing | | 2.4 |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies | | 2.3 |
Pharmaceuticals | | 1.8 |
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) | | 1.7 |
Specialty Retail | | 1.5 |
Construction & Engineering | | 1.3 |
Auto Components | | 1.2 |
Personal Products | | 0.8 |
Health Care Technology | | 0.7 |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | | 0.7 |
Media | | 0.5 |
Metals & Mining | | 0.4 |
Total | | 100.0 |
HSBC Opportunity Portfolio | | |
| | Percentage of |
Investment Allocation | | Investments at Value(%) |
Specialty Retail | | 11.4 |
Machinery | | 7.4 |
Road & Rail | | 5.6 |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | | 5.4 |
IT Services | | 5.2 |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies | | 4.6 |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | | 4.6 |
Aerospace & Defense | | 4.3 |
Investment Companies | | 4.0 |
Containers & Packaging | | 3.7 |
Trading Companies & Distributors | | 3.7 |
Software | | 3.5 |
Chemicals | | 3.5 |
Commercial Banks | | 3.1 |
Energy Equipment & Services | | 3.1 |
Capital Markets | | 2.9 |
Electrical Equipment | | 2.7 |
Food Products | | 2.7 |
Pharmaceuticals | | 2.3 |
Health Care Providers & Services | | 2.2 |
Life Sciences Tools & Services | | 2.0 |
Professional Services | | 2.0 |
Insurance | | 2.0 |
Commercial Services & Supplies | | 1.8 |
Real Estate Management & Development | | 1.7 |
Communications Equipment | | 1.6 |
Diversified Financial Services | | 1.2 |
Personal Products | | 1.2 |
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | | 0.4 |
Wireless Telecommunication Services | | 0.3 |
Total | | 100.0 |
____________________
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
12 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Opportunity |
| | Growth | | Opportunity | | Fund |
| | Fund | | Fund | | (Advisor) |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Affiliated Portfolios | | | $ | 80,298,715 | | | | $ | 12,672,072 | | | | $ | 138,599,949 | |
Receivable for capital shares issued | | | | 261,336 | | | | | 737 | | | | | 225,468 | |
Receivable from Investment Adviser | | | | — | | | | | 8,343 | | | | | — | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | | 21,932 | | | | | 13,268 | | | | | 9,134 | |
Total Assets | | | | 80,581,983 | | | | | 12,694,420 | | | | | 138,834,551 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payable for capital shares redeemed | | | | 136,167 | | | | | 32,034 | | | | | 77,339 | |
Payable to Investment Adviser | | | | 1,439 | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Administration | | | | 1,642 | | | | | 257 | | | | | 2,807 | |
Distribution | | | | 688 | | | | | 572 | | | | | — | |
Shareholder Servicing | | | | 3,523 | | | | | 3,215 | | | | | — | |
Transfer Agent | | | | 4,203 | | | | | 4,161 | | | | | 1,619 | |
Trustee | | | | 79 | | | | | 14 | | | | | 62 | |
Other | | | | 28,389 | | | | | 474 | | | | | 61,810 | |
Total Liabilities | | | | 176,130 | | | | | 40,727 | | | | | 143,637 | |
Net Assets | | | $ | 80,405,853 | | | | $ | 12,653,693 | | | | $ | 138,690,914 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Composition of Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital | | | | 58,163,611 | | | | | 10,220,755 | | | | | 112,594,495 | |
Accumulated net investment income loss | | | | (50,367 | ) | | | | (57,718 | ) | | | | (258,551 | ) |
Accumulated net realized gains (losses) from investment | | | | 6,186,330 | | | | | 437,115 | | | | | 4,779,060 | |
Unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | | 16,106,279 | | | | | 2,053,541 | | | | | 21,575,910 | |
Net Assets | | | $ | 80,405,853 | | | | $ | 12,653,693 | | | | $ | 138,690,914 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | $ | 15,373,306 | | | | $ | 11,717,978 | | | | $ | — | |
Class B Shares | | | | 739,722 | | | | | 481,400 | | | | | — | |
Class C Shares | | | | 338,072 | | | | | 454,315 | | | | | — | |
Class I Shares | | | | 63,954,753 | | | | | — | | | | | 138,690,914 | |
| | | $ | 80,405,853 | | | | $ | 12,653,693 | | | | $ | 138,690,914 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($0.001 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | 823,456 | | | | | 1,143,223 | | | | | — | |
Class B Shares | | | | 43,605 | | | | | 59,128 | | | | | — | |
Class C Shares | | | | 19,808 | | | | | 54,451 | | | | | — | |
Class I Shares | | | | 3,373,735 | | | | | — | | | | | 10,248,040 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | $ | 18.67 | | | | $ | 10.25 | | | | $ | — | |
Class B Shares(a) | | | $ | 16.96 | | | | $ | 8.14 | | | | $ | — | |
Class C Shares(a) | | | $ | 17.07 | | | | $ | 8.34 | | | | $ | — | |
Class I Shares | | | $ | 18.96 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 13.53 | |
Maximum Sales Charge - Class A Shares | | | | 5.00 | % | | | | 5.00 | % | | | | — | % |
Maximum Offering Price per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Net Asset Value/(100%-maximum sales charge)) - Class A Shares | | | $ | 19.65 | | | | $ | 10.79 | | | | $ | — | |
____________________
(a) Redemption Price per share varies by length of time shares are held.
14 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Operations—For the six months ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Opportunity |
| | Growth | | Opportunity | | Fund |
| | Fund | | Fund | | (Advisor) |
Investment Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Income from Affiliated Portfolios (a) | | | $ | 327,648 | | | | $ | 40,810 | | | | $ | 436,486 | |
Expenses from Affiliated Portfolios (a) | | | | (248,159 | ) | | | | (53,422 | ) | | | | (570,216 | ) |
Total Investment Income (Loss) | | | | 79,489 | | | | | (12,612 | ) | | | | (133,730 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Administration: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | 4,026 | | | | | 3,032 | | | | | — | |
Class B Shares | | | | 240 | | | | | 142 | | | | | — | |
Class C Shares | | | | 71 | | | | | 121 | | | | | — | |
Class I Shares | | | | 15,316 | | | | | — | | | | | 35,066 | |
Distribution: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares | | | | 3,288 | | | | | 1,929 | | | | | — | |
Class C Shares | | | | 1,017 | | | | | 1,676 | | | | | — | |
Shareholder Servicing: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | 18,649 | | | | | 13,159 | | | | | — | |
Class B Shares | | | | 1,096 | | | | | 643 | | | | | — | |
Class C Shares | | | | 339 | | | | | 559 | | | | | — | |
Accounting | | | | 11,939 | | | | | 9,446 | | | | | 4,477 | |
Compliance Service | | | | 298 | | | | | 55 | | | | | 525 | |
Printing | | | | 21,966 | | | | | 3,082 | | | | | 40,746 | |
Transfer Agent | | | | 41,686 | | | | | 25,560 | | | | | 27,554 | |
Trustee | | | | 976 | | | | | 124 | | | | | 1,707 | |
Registration fees | | | | 17,212 | | | | | 9,323 | | | | | 3,892 | |
Other | | | | 6,407 | | | | | 1,473 | | | | | 10,854 | |
Total expenses before fee reductions | | | | 144,526 | | | | | 70,324 | | | | | 124,821 | |
Fees contractually reduced by Investment Adviser | | | | (14,670 | ) | | | | (19,094 | ) | | | | — | |
Fees voluntarily reduced by Investment Adviser | | | | — | | | | | (6,124 | ) | | | | — | |
Net Expenses | | | | 129,856 | | | | | 45,106 | | | | | 124,821 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income (Loss) | | | | (50,367 | ) | | | | (57,718 | ) | | | | (258,551 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Investments:(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investment securities | | | | 6,122,254 | | | | | 635,080 | | | | | 6,376,935 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | | 2,897,258 | | | | | 956,239 | | | | | 10,434,149 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized/unrealized gains from investments transactions | | | | 9,019,512 | | | | | 1,591,319 | | | | | 16,811,084 | |
Change In Net Assets Resulting From Operations | | | $ | 8,969,145 | | | | $ | 1,533,601 | | | | $ | 16,552,533 | |
____________________
(a) Represents amounts allocated from the respective Affiliated Portfolios.
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 15 |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | Growth Fund | | Opportunity Fund |
| | For the | For the | | For the | For the |
| | six months ended | year ended | | six months ended | year ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | $ | (50,367 | ) | | $ | (211,298 | ) | | | $ | (57,718 | ) | | $ | (91,095 | ) |
Net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | | 6,122,254 | | | | 6,871,855 | | | | | 635,080 | | | | 1,941,921 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | | 2,897,258 | | | | 383,956 | | | | | 956,239 | | | | (495,829 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | | 8,969,145 | | | | 7,044,513 | | | | | 1,533,601 | | | | 1,354,997 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (1,598,939 | ) | | | (183,592 | ) |
Class B Shares | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (93,318 | ) | | | (11,590 | ) |
Class C Shares | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (76,609 | ) | | | (6,561 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from shareholder dividends | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (1,768,866 | ) | | | (201,743 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | | | (2,348,296 | ) | | | (582,610 | ) | | | | 771,505 | | | | (1,316,886 | ) |
Change in net assets | | | | 6,620,849 | | | | 6,461,903 | | | | | 536,240 | | | | (163,632 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | | 73,785,004 | | | | 67,323,101 | | | | | 12,117,453 | | | | 12,281,085 | |
End of period | | | $ | 80,405,853 | | | $ | 73,785,004 | | | | $ | 12,653,693 | | | $ | 12,117,453 | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | | $ | (50,367 | ) | | $ | (211,298 | ) | | | $ | (57,718 | ) | | $ | (91,095 | ) |
16 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| | Growth Fund | | Opportunity Fund |
| | For the | For the | | For the | For the |
| | six months ended | year ended | | six months ended | year ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | |
CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | $ | 494,298 | | | $ | 1,036,796 | | | | $ | 534,862 | | | $ | 2,442,156 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 1,562,653 | | | | 182,620 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (2,256,974 | ) | | | (3,859,930 | ) | | | | (1,339,832 | ) | | | (3,824,914 | ) |
Class A Shares capital transactions | | | | (1,762,676 | ) | | | (2,823,134 | ) | | | | 757,683 | | | | (1,200,138 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | 18,024 | | | | 79,343 | | | | | 5,269 | | | | 53,441 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 93,292 | | | | 11,521 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (342,508 | ) | | | (448,436 | ) | | | | (123,648 | ) | | | (249,484 | ) |
Class B Shares capital transactions | | | | (324,484 | ) | | | (369,093 | ) | | | | (25,087 | ) | | | (184,522 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | 81,855 | | | | 81,604 | | | | | 11,716 | | | | 97,064 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 76,317 | | | | 6,561 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (25,046 | ) | | | (36,230 | ) | | | | (49,124 | ) | | | (35,851 | ) |
Class C Shares capital transactions | | | | 56,809 | | | | 45,374 | | | | | 38,909 | | | | 67,774 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | 9,043,559 | | | | 15,376,187 | | | | | — | | | | — | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (9,361,504 | ) | | | (12,811,944 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | |
Class I Shares capital transactions | | | | (317,945 | ) | | | 2,564,243 | | | | | — | | | | — | |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | | $ | (2,348,296 | ) | | $ | (582,610 | ) | | | $ | 771,505 | | | $ | (1,316,886 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 28,139 | | | | 61,592 | | | | | 53,562 | | | | 210,382 | |
Reinvested | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 175,974 | | | | 17,099 | |
Redeemed | | | | (129,770 | ) | | | (232,059 | ) | | | | (134,311 | ) | | | (346,398 | ) |
Change in Class A Shares | | | | (101,631 | ) | | | (170,467 | ) | | | | 95,225 | | | | (118,917 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 1,100 | | | | 5,111 | | | | | 637 | | | | 5,840 | |
Reinvested | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 13,196 | | | | 1,296 | |
Redeemed | | | | (21,084 | ) | | | (29,395 | ) | | | | (15,638 | ) | | | (27,608 | ) |
Change in Class B Shares | | | | (19,984 | ) | | | (24,284 | ) | | | | (1,805 | ) | | | (20,472 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 4,830 | | | | 5,756 | | | | | 1,377 | | | | 10,495 | |
Reinvested | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 10,526 | | | | 723 | |
Redeemed | | | | (1,512 | ) | | | (2,539 | ) | | | | (6,060 | ) | | | (3,974 | ) |
Change in Class C Shares | | | | 3,318 | | | | 3,217 | | | | | 5,843 | | | | 7,244 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 504,015 | | | | 909,571 | | | | | — | | | | — | |
Redeemed | | | | (530,973 | ) | | | (765,583 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | |
Change in Class I Shares | | | | (26,958 | ) | | | 143,988 | | | | | — | | | | — | |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 17 |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| | Opportunity Fund (Advisor) |
| | For the | For the |
| | six months ended | year ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | $ | (258,551 | ) | | $ | (91,185 | ) |
Net realized gains (losses) from investment transactions | | | | 6,376,935 | | | | 19,552,882 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from investments and foreign currencies | | | | 10,434,149 | | | | (4,003,173 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | | 16,552,533 | | | | 15,458,524 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Dividends: | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains: | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | (18,686,312 | ) | | | (2,935,113 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from shareholder dividends | | | | (18,686,312 | ) | | | (2,935,113 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | | | 18,807,375 | | | | (7,570,425 | ) |
Change in net assets | | | | 16,673,596 | | | | 4,952,986 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | | 122,017,318 | | | | 117,064,332 | |
End of period | | | $ | 138,690,914 | | | $ | 122,017,318 | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | | $ | (258,551 | ) | | $ | (91,185 | ) |
18 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| | Opportunity Fund (Advisor) |
| | For the | For the |
| | six months ended | year ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | |
CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | 14,572,910 | | | | 18,642,358 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 17,155,964 | | | | 2,626,240 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (12,921,499 | ) | | | (28,839,023 | ) |
Advisor Shares capital transactions | | | | 18,807,375 | | | | (7,570,425 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | | $ | 18,807,375 | | | $ | (7,570,425 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 1,069,604 | | | | 1,309,527 | |
Reinvested | | | | 1,465,070 | | | | 187,589 | |
Redeemed | | | | (991,297 | ) | | | (1,963,117 | ) |
Change in Advisor Shares | | | | 1,543,377 | | | | (466,001 | ) |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 19 |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.*
| | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios of | | |
| | | | | | Net Realized | | | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Expenses to | | |
| | Net Asset | | Net | | and Unrealized | | | | | | Realized | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Investment | | Average Net | | |
| | Value, | | Investment | | Gains | | Total from | | Net | | Gains from | | | | Net Asset | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | Income (Loss) | | Assets | | |
| | Beginning | | Income | | (Losses) from | | Investment | | Investment | | Investment | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | to Average Net | | (Excluding Fee | | Portfolio |
| | of Period | | (Loss)(a) | | Investments | | Activities | | Income | | Transactions | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(b) | | (000’s) | | Assets(c) | | Assets(c) | | Reductions)(c) | | Turnover(b)(d) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 14.86 | | | | — | (e) | | | | 4.23 | | | | | 4.23 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | (1.13 | ) | | | | (1.14 | ) | | | | $ | 17.95 | | | 30.45 | %(f) | | | $ | 30,858 | | | | 1.11 | %(f) | | | | (0.03 | )%(f) | | | | 1.22 | % | | | | 57 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 17.95 | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | (6.51 | ) | | | | (6.56 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.84 | ) | | | | (0.84 | ) | | | | | 10.55 | | | (38.23 | )%(g) | | | | 17,180 | | | | 1.20 | % | | | | (0.36 | )% | | | | 1.22 | % | | | | 158 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 10.55 | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | 2.03 | | | | | 1.99 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 12.54 | | | 18.86 | %(h) | | | | 15,896 | | | | 1.20 | % | | | | (0.33 | )% | | | | 1.31 | % | | | | 66 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 12.54 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | 2.55 | | | | | 2.48 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 15.02 | | | 19.78 | %(i)(j) | | | | 16,452 | | | | 1.20 | % | | | | (0.54 | )%(j) | | | | 1.23 | % | | | | 89 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 15.02 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | 1.64 | | | | | 1.57 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 16.59 | | | 10.45 | %(k) | | | | 15,349 | | | | 1.18 | % | | | | (0.45 | )% | | | | 1.18 | % | | | | 56 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 16.59 | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | 2.11 | | | | | 2.08 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 18.67 | | | 12.54 | % | | | | 15,373 | | | | 1.20 | % | | | | (0.32 | )% | | | | 1.24 | % | | | | 20 | % | |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 14.17 | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | | 3.99 | | | | | 3.88 | | | | | — | | | | | (1.13 | ) | | | | (1.13 | ) | | | | $ | 16.92 | | | 29.43 | %(f) | | | $ | 1,630 | | | | 1.86 | %(f) | | | | (0.78 | )%(f) | | | | 1.98 | % | | | | 57 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 16.92 | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | (6.07 | ) | | | | (6.23 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.84 | ) | | | | (0.84 | ) | | | | | 9.85 | | | (38.62 | )%(g) | | | | 2,839 | | | | 1.95 | % | | | | (1.20 | )% | | | | 1.96 | % | | | | 158 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 9.85 | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | 1.85 | | | | | 1.75 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 11.60 | | | 17.87 | %(h) | | | | 2,059 | | | | 1.95 | % | | | | (1.06 | )% | | | | 2.06 | % | | | | 66 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 11.60 | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | 2.36 | | | | | 2.20 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 13.80 | | | 18.97 | %(i)(j) | | | | 1,213 | | | | 1.95 | % | | | | (1.28 | )%(j) | | | | 1.98 | % | | | | 89 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 13.80 | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | | 1.51 | | | | | 1.33 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 15.13 | | | 9.64 | %(k) | | | | 962 | | | | 1.93 | % | | | | (1.19 | )% | | | | 1.93 | % | | | | 56 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 15.13 | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | | 1.91 | | | | | 1.83 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 16.96 | | | 12.10 | % | | | | 740 | | | | 1.95 | % | | | | (1.05 | )% | | | | 1.99 | % | | | | 20 | % | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 14.24 | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | | 4.02 | | | | | 3.91 | | | | | — | | | | | (1.13 | ) | | | | (1.13 | ) | | | | $ | 17.02 | | | 29.49 | %(f) | | | $ | 98 | | | | 1.86 | %(f) | | | | (0.79 | )%(f) | | | | 1.96 | % | | | | 57 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 17.02 | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | (6.11 | ) | | | | (6.27 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.84 | ) | | | | (0.84 | ) | | | | | 9.91 | | | (38.63 | )%(g) | | | | 72 | | | | 1.95 | % | | | | (1.13 | )% | | | | 1.97 | % | | | | 158 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 9.91 | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | 1.89 | | | | | 1.77 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 11.68 | | | 17.86 | %(h) | | | | 120 | | | | 1.95 | % | | | | (1.12 | )% | | | | 2.05 | % | | | | 66 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 11.68 | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | 2.38 | | | | | 2.21 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 13.89 | | | 18.92 | %(i)(j) | | | | 184 | | | | 1.95 | % | | | | (1.30 | )%(j) | | | | 1.99 | % | | | | 89 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 13.89 | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | | 1.52 | | | | | 1.34 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 15.23 | | | 9.65 | %(k) | | | | 251 | | | | 1.94 | % | | | | (1.21 | )% | | | | 1.94 | % | | | | 56 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 15.23 | | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | 1.93 | | | | | 1.84 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 17.07 | | | 12.08 | % | | | | 338 | | | | 1.95 | % | | | | (1.08 | )% | | | | 1.99 | % | | | | 20 | % | |
CLASS I SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 14.90 | | | | 0.03 | | | | | 4.24 | | | | | 4.27 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | (1.13 | ) | | | | (1.15 | ) | | | | $ | 18.02 | | | 30.73 | %(f) | | | $ | 30,295 | | | | 0.87 | %(f) | | | | 0.20 | %(f) | | | | 0.96 | % | | | | 57 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 18.02 | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | (6.54 | ) | | | | (6.56 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.84 | ) | | | | (0.84 | ) | | | | | 10.62 | | | (38.07 | )%(g) | | | | 38,868 | | | | 0.95 | % | | | | (0.16 | )% | | | | 0.97 | % | | | | 158 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 10.62 | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | 2.04 | | | | | 2.03 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 12.65 | | | 19.11 | %(h) | | | | 39,400 | | | | 0.95 | % | | | | (0.08 | )% | | | | 1.06 | % | | | | 66 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 12.65 | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | 2.58 | | | | | 2.54 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 15.19 | | | 20.08 | %(i)(j) | | | | 49,474 | | | | 0.95 | % | | | | (0.30 | )%(j) | | | | 0.99 | % | | | | 89 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 15.19 | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | 1.68 | | | | | 1.64 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 16.83 | | | 10.80 | %(k) | | | | 57,222 | | | | 0.94 | % | | | | (0.22 | )% | | | | 0.94 | % | | | | 56 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 16.83 | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | 2.14 | | | | | 2.13 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 18.96 | | | 12.66 | % | | | | 63,955 | | | | 0.95 | % | | | | (0.07 | )% | | | | 0.99 | % | | | | 20 | % | |
* | The per share amounts and percentages reflect income and expenses assuming inclusion of the Fund’s proportionate share of the income and expenses of the HSBC Growth Portfolio. |
(a) | Calculated based on average shares outstanding. |
(b) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any sales or redemption charges. |
(c) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(d) | Portfolio Turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Portfolio in which the Fund invests all of its investable assets. Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without distinguishing between the classes of shares issued. |
(e) | Represents less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
(f) | During the year ended October 31, 2007, the Investment Adviser reimbursed amounts to the Fund related to past marketing arrangements. The corresponding impact to the net expense ratio, net income ratio and the total returns were 0.09%, 0.09%, 0.09% and 0.08% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares and Class I Shares, respectively. |
(g) | During the year ended October 31, 2008, the Portfolio in which the Fund invests received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.19%, 0.19%, 0.19% and 0.19% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares and Class I Shares, respectively. |
(h) | During the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio in which the Fund invests received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.50%, 0.54%, 0.53% and 0.49% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares and Class I Shares, respectively. |
(i) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Portfolio in which the Fund invests received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.17%, 0.17%, 0.17% and 0.17% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares and Class I Shares, respectively. |
(j) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Fund received a distribution from a “fair fund” established by the SEC in connection with a consent order against BISYS Fund Services, Inc. (See Note 7 in Notes to Financial Statements). The corresponding impact to the net income ratio and the total return was 0.02%, 0.02%, 0.02% and 0.02% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares and Class I Shares, respectively. |
(k) | During the year ended October 31, 2011, the Portfolio, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.28%, 0.28%, 0.28% and 0.28% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares and Class I Shares, respectively. |
20 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.*
| | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios of | | |
| | | | | | Net Realized | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Expenses to | | |
| | Net Asset | | Net | | and Unrealized | | | | Realized | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Investment | | Average Net | | |
| | Value, | | Investment | | Gains | | Total from | | Gains from | | | | Net Asset | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | Income (Loss) | | Assets | | |
| | Beginning | | Income | | (Losses) from | | Investment | | Investment | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | to Average | | (Excluding Fee | | Portfolio |
| | of Period | | (Loss)(a) | | Investments | | Activities | | Transactions | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(b) | | (000’s) | | Assets(c) | | Net Assets(c) | | Reductions)(c) | | Turnover(b)(d) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 14.29 | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | 4.01 | | | | | 3.85 | | | | | (1.73 | ) | | | | (1.73 | ) | | | | $ | 16.41 | | | 30.28 | %(e) | | | $ | 15,057 | | | | 1.52 | %(e) | | | | (1.13 | )%(e) | | | | 1.77 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 16.41 | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | (4.04 | ) | | | | (4.16 | ) | | | | (5.16 | ) | | | | (5.16 | ) | | | | | 7.09 | | | (35.84 | )% | | | | 9,600 | | | | 1.55 | % | | | | (1.13 | )% | | | | 1.82 | % | | | | 80 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 7.09 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | 0.97 | | | | | 0.90 | | | | | (0.43 | ) | | | | (0.43 | ) | | | | | 7.56 | | | 14.85 | % | | | | 9,687 | | | | 1.55 | % | | | | (1.02 | )% | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | 65 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 7.56 | | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | 2.20 | | | | | 2.11 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 9.67 | | | 27.91 | %(f)(g) | | | | 11,282 | | | | 1.55 | % | | | | (1.00 | )%(f) | | | | 2.07 | % | | | | 68 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 9.67 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | 1.19 | | | | | 1.12 | | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | | 10.63 | | | 11.59 | %(h) | | | | 11,145 | | | | 1.55 | % | | | | (0.62 | )% | | | | 1.85 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 10.63 | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | 1.22 | | | | | 1.18 | | | | | (1.56 | ) | | | | (1.56 | ) | | | | | 10.25 | | | 13.40 | %(i) | | | | 11,718 | | | | 1.55 | % | | | | (0.88 | )% | | | | 1.96 | % | | | | 32 | % | |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 13.25 | | | | (0.25 | ) | | | | 3.67 | | | | | 3.42 | | | | | (1.73 | ) | | | | (1.73 | ) | | | | $ | 14.94 | | | 29.30 | %(e) | | | $ | 4,928 | | | | 2.26 | %(e) | | | | (1.91 | )%(e) | | | | 2.52 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 14.94 | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | | (3.50 | ) | | | | (3.68 | ) | | | | (5.16 | ) | | | | (5.16 | ) | | | | | 6.10 | | | (36.30 | )% | | | | 1,578 | | | | 2.29 | % | | | | (1.88 | )% | | | | 2.58 | % | | | | 80 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 6.10 | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | 0.80 | | | | | 0.70 | | | | | (0.43 | ) | | | | (0.43 | ) | | | | | 6.37 | | | 13.92 | % | | | | 1,082 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | (1.77 | )% | | | | 3.10 | % | | | | 65 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 6.37 | | | | (0.13 | ) | | | | 1.85 | | | | | 1.72 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 8.09 | | | 27.00 | %(f)(g) | | | | 658 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | (1.78 | )%(f) | | | | 2.86 | % | | | | 68 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 8.09 | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | 0.99 | | | | | 0.87 | | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | | 8.80 | | | 10.75 | %(h) | | | | 536 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | (1.36 | )% | | | | 2.64 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 8.80 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | 0.97 | | | | | 0.90 | | | | | (1.56 | ) | | | | (1.56 | ) | | | | | 8.14 | | | 12.96 | %(i) | | | | 481 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | (1.63 | )% | | | | 2.73 | % | | | | 32 | % | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 13.38 | | | | (0.26 | ) | | | | 3.72 | | | | | 3.46 | | | | | (1.73 | ) | | | | (1.73 | ) | | | | $ | 15.11 | | | 29.32 | %(e) | | | $ | 334 | | | | 2.27 | %(e) | | | | (1.91 | )%(e) | | | | 2.50 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 15.11 | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | (3.57 | ) | | | | (3.74 | ) | | | | (5.16 | ) | | | | (5.16 | ) | | | | | 6.21 | | | (36.27 | )% | | | | 189 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | (1.88 | )% | | | | 2.58 | % | | | | 80 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 6.21 | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | 0.81 | | | | | 0.71 | | | | | (0.43 | ) | | | | (0.43 | ) | | | | | 6.49 | | | 13.83 | % | | | | 267 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | (1.78 | )% | | | | 3.08 | % | | | | 65 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 6.49 | | | | (0.13 | ) | | | | 1.89 | | | | | 1.76 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 8.25 | | | 27.12 | %(f)(g) | | | | 341 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | (1.75 | )%(f) | | | | 2.86 | % | | | | 68 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 8.25 | | | | (0.13 | ) | | | | 1.02 | | | | | 0.89 | | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | | 8.98 | | | 10.79 | %(h) | | | | 437 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | (1.38 | )% | | | | 2.64 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 8.98 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | 0.99 | | | | | 0.92 | | | | | (1.56 | ) | | | | (1.56 | ) | | | | | 8.34 | | | 12.90 | %(i) | | | | 454 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | (1.63 | )% | | | | 2.73 | % | | | | 32 | % | |
* | The per share amounts and percentages reflect income and expense assuming the inclusion of the Fund’s proportionate share of the income and expenses of the HSBC Opportunity Portfolio. |
(a) | Calculated based on average shares outstanding. |
(b) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any sales or redemption charges. |
(c) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(d) | Portfolio Turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the respective Portfolio in which the Fund invests all of its investable assets. |
(e) | During the year ended October 31, 2007, the Investment Adviser reimbursed amounts to the Fund related to past marketing arrangements. The corresponding impact to the net expense ratio, net income ratio and the total returns were 0.03%, 0.04% and 0.03% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(f) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the respective Portfolio in which the Fund invests received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.15%, 0.15% and 0.15% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(g) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Fund received a distribution from a “fair fund” established by the SEC in connection with a consent order against BISYS Fund Services, Inc. (See Note 7 in Notes to Financial Statements). Corresponding impact to the net income ratio and the total return was 0.01%, 0.01% and 0.01% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(h) | During the year ended October 31, 2011, the Portfolio, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.10%, 0.10% and 0.10% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(i) | During the period ended April 30, 2012, the Portfolio, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.09%, 0.09% and 0.09% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 21 |
HSBC - OPPORTUNITY FUND (ADVISOR) |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.*
| | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios of | | |
| | | | | | Net Realized | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Expenses to | | |
| | Net Asset | | Net | | and Unrealized | | | | Realized | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Investment | | Average | | |
| | Value, | | Investment | | Gains | | Total from | | Gains from | | | | Net Asset | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | Income (Loss) | | Net Assets | | |
| | Beginning | | Income | | (Losses) from | | Investment | | Investment | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | to Average Net | | (Excluding Fee | | Portfolio |
| | of Period | | (Loss)(a) | | Investments | | Activities | | Transactions | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(b) | | (000’s) | | Assets(c) | | Assets(c) | | Reductions)(c) | | Turnover(b)(d) |
CLASS I SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 17.28 | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | | 4.48 | | | | | 4.37 | | | | | (2.71 | ) | | | | (2.71 | ) | | | | $ | 18.94 | | | 29.42 | %(e) | | | $ | 176,593 | | | | 0.96 | %(e) | | | | (0.60 | )%(e) | | | | 1.03 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 18.94 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | (4.99 | ) | | | | (5.06 | ) | | | | (4.97 | ) | | | | (4.97 | ) | | | | | 8.91 | | | (35.39 | )% | | | $ | 97,841 | | | | 0.97 | % | | | | (0.55 | )% | | | | 0.97 | % | | | | 80 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.91 | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | 1.32 | | | | | 1.28 | | | | | (0.26 | ) | | | | (0.26 | ) | | | | | 9.93 | | | 15.47 | % | | | | 100,285 | | | | 1.02 | % | | | | (0.50 | )% | | | | 1.02 | % | | | | 65 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 9.93 | | | | (0.06 | ) | | | | 2.90 | | | | | 2.84 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | 12.77 | | | 28.60 | %(f)(g) | | | | 117,064 | | | | 1.01 | % | | | | (0.46 | )%(g) | | | | 1.01 | % | | | | 68 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 12.77 | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | 1.57 | | | | | 1.56 | | | | | (0.31 | ) | | | | (0.31 | ) | | | | | 14.02 | | | 12.25 | %(h) | | | | 122,017 | | | | 1.01 | % | | | | (0.07 | )% | | | | 1.01 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 14.02 | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | 1.61 | | | | | 1.58 | | | | | (2.07 | ) | | | | (2.07 | ) | | | | | 13.53 | | | 13.59 | %(i) | | | | 138,691 | | | | 1.06 | % | | | | (0.40 | )% | | | | 1.06 | % | | | | 32 | % | |
* | The per share amounts and percentages reflect income and expense assuming inclusion of the Fund’s proportionate share of the income and expenses of the HSBC Opportunity Portfolio. |
(a) | Calculated based on average shares outstanding. |
(b) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any sales or redemption charges. |
(c) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(d) | Portfolio Turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the respective Portfolio in which the Fund invests all of its investable assets. Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without distinguishing between the classes of shares issued. |
(e) | During the year ended October 31, 2007, the Investment Adviser reimbursed amounts to the Fund related to past marketing arrangements. The corresponding impact to the net expense ratio, net income ratio and the total returns were 0.07% for the Class I Shares. |
(f) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the respective Portfolio in which the Fund invests received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.15% for Class I Shares. |
(g) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Fund received a distribution from a “fair fund” established by the SEC in connection with a consent order against BISYS Fund Services, Inc. (See Note 7 in Notes to Financial Statements). The corresponding impact to the net income ratio and the total return was 0.01% for the Class I Shares. |
(h) | During the year ended October 31, 2011, the Portfolio, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.10% for Class I Shares. |
(i) | During the period ended April 30, 2012, the Portfolio, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.08% for Class I Shares. |
22 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
1. Organization:
The HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds) (the “Trust’’), a Massachusetts business trust organized on April 22, 1987, and the HSBC Advisor Funds Trust (the “Advisor Trust’’), a Massachusetts business trust organized on April 5, 1996, are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act’’), as open-end management investment companies. As of April 30, 2012, the Trust is comprised of 16 separate operational funds and the Advisor Trust is comprised of 1 operational fund, each a series of the HSBC Family of Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Family of Funds), which also includes the HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (the “Portfolio Trust’’) (collectively the “Trusts’’). The accompanying financial statements are presented for the following 3 funds (individually a “Fund’’, collectively the “Funds’’) of the Trust and Advisor Trust:
Fund | | | Short Name | | | Trust | |
HSBC Growth Fund (formerly, HSBC Investor | | | | |
Growth Fund) | | Growth Fund | | Trust |
HSBC Opportunity Fund (formerly, HSBC Investor | | | | |
Opportunity Fund) | | Opportunity Fund | | Trust |
HSBC Opportunity Fund (Advisor) (formerly, | | | | |
HSBC Investor Opportunity Fund (Advisor)) | | Opportunity Fund (Advisor) | | Advisor Trust |
All the Funds are diversified funds. Financial statements for all other funds of the Trusts are published separately.
Each Fund utilizes a master-feeder fund structure and seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing all of its investable assets in its respective Portfolio (as defined below).
| | | | Proportionate |
| | | | Ownership |
| | | | Interest on |
Fund | | | Respective Portfolio | | | April 30, 2012(%) |
Growth Fund | | HSBC Growth Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor | | |
| | Growth Portfolio) | | 86.0 |
Opportunity Fund | | HSBC Opportunity Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor | | |
| | Opportunity Portfolio) | | 8.2 |
Opportunity Fund (Advisor) | | HSBC Opportunity Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor | | |
| | Opportunity Portfolio) | | 89.5 |
The HSBC Growth Portfolio and HSBC Opportunity Portfolio (individually a “Portfolio’’, collectively the “Portfolios’’) are diversified series of the Portfolio Trust. The Portfolios operate as master funds in master-feeder arrangements and also may receive investments from certain fund of funds.
The financial statements of the Portfolios, including the Schedules of Portfolio Investments, are included elsewhere in this report. The financial statements of the Portfolios should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Funds.
The Funds are authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with a par value of $0.001 per share. The Growth Fund offers four classes of shares: Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, and Class I Shares. The Opportunity Fund offers three classes of shares: Class A Shares, Class B Shares, and Class C Shares. Class A Shares of the Funds have a maximum sales charge of 5.00% as a percentage of the original purchase price. Class B Shares of the Funds are offered without any front-end sales charge but will be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC’’) ranging from a maximum of 4.00% if redeemed less than one year after purchase to 0.00% if redeemed more than four years after purchase. Class C Shares of the Funds are offered without any front-end sales charge but will be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00% if redeemed less than one year after purchase. No sales charges are assessed with respect to Class I Shares of the Funds. Each class of shares in the Funds has identical rights and privileges except with respect to arrangements pertaining to shareholder servicing or distribution, class-related expenses, voting rights on matters affecting a single class of shares, and the exchange privilege of each class of shares.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 23
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Under the Trusts’ organizational documents, the Trusts’ officers and Trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Trusts enter into contracts with service providers, which also provide for indemnifications by the Funds. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve any future claims that may be made against the Funds. However, based on experience, the Trusts expect that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies:
The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements. The policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP’’). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities Valuation:
The Funds record their investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 3 below.
Investment Transactions and Related Income:
The Funds record investments into the Portfolios on a trade date basis. The Funds record daily their proportionate share of income, expenses, changes in unrealized appreciation and depreciation and realized gains and losses derived from their respective Portfolios. In addition, the Funds accrue their own expenses daily as incurred.
Allocations:
Expenses directly attributable to a Fund are charged to that Fund. Expenses not directly attributable to a Fund are allocated proportionately among the applicable series within the Trusts in relation to the net assets of each fund or on another reasonable basis. Class specific expenses are charged directly to the class incurring the expense. In addition, income, expenses (other than class specific expenses), and unrealized/realized gains and losses are allocated to each class based on relative net assets on a daily basis.
Dividends to Shareholders:
Dividends to shareholders from net investment income, if any, are declared and distributed semi-annually in the case of the Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund and Opportunity (Advisor) Fund.
The Funds’ net realized gains, if any, are distributed to shareholders at least annually. Additional distributions are also made to the Funds’ shareholders to the extent necessary to avoid the federal excise tax on certain undistributed income and net capital gains of regulated investment companies.
The amount and character of net investment income and net realized gains distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations which may differ from GAAP. These “book/tax’’ differences are either considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., reclassification of market discounts, certain gain/loss, paydowns, and certain distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets; temporary differences (e.g., wash losses and post-October loss deferrals) do not require reclassification. The Funds may utilize equalization accounting for tax purposes and designate earnings and profits, including net realized gains distributed to shareholders on redemption of shares, as a part of the dividends paid deduction for income tax purposes. To the extent distributions to shareholders from net investment income and net realized gains exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes, they are reported as distributions of capital.
Federal Income Taxes:
Each Fund is a separate taxable entity for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund has qualified and intends to continue to qualify each year as a “regulated investment company’’ under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and to distribute substantially all of its taxable net investment income and net realized gains, if any, to its shareholders. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is required.
24 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Management of the Funds has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
3. Investment Valuation Summary:
The valuation techniques employed by the Funds, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Funds’ investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
- Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
- Level 2: other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
- Level 3: significant unobservable inputs (including a Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
The Funds record their investments in their respective Portfolios at fair value, which is typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The underlying securities of the Portfolios are recorded at fair value, as more fully discussed in the Notes to Financial Statements of the Portfolios included in this report.
For the period ended April 30, 2012, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of April 30, 2012 in valuing the Funds’ investments based upon three levels defined above:
| | LEVEL 1($) | | LEVEL 2($) | | LEVEL 3($) | | TOTAL($) |
Growth Fund | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Portfolio(a) | | — | | 80,298,715 | | — | | 80,298,715 |
Total Investment Securities | | — | | 80,298,715 | | — | | 80,298,715 |
| | | | | | | | |
Opportunity Fund | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Portfolio(a) | | — | | 12,672,072 | | — | | 12,672,072 |
Total Investment Securities | | — | | 12,672,072 | | — | | 12,672,072 |
| | | | | | | | |
Opportunity Fund (Advisor) | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Portfolio(a) | | — | | 138,599,949 | | — | | 138,599,949 |
Total Investment Securities | | — | | 138,599,949 | | — | | 138,599,949 |
____________________
(a) | Investments in Affiliated Portfolios represent ownership interests in the Portfolios. Due to the Funds’ master-feeder structure, the inputs used for valuing these instruments are categorized as Level 2. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 25
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
The Trust recognizes significant transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. There were no significant transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 as of April 30, 2012 from the valuation input levels used on October 31, 2011.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04 (“ASU 2011-04”), “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS”. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 will have no effect on each Fund’s net assets. At this time, management is evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2011-04 on the financial statement disclosures.
4. Related Party Transactions and Other Agreements and Plans:
Investment Management:
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (“HSBC’’ or the “Investment Adviser’’), a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC Bank USA, N.A., a national bank organized under the laws of the United States, acts as Investment Adviser to the Portfolios. As Investment Adviser, HSBC manages the investments of the Portfolios and continuously reviews, supervises, and administers the Portfolios’ investments. The Funds are not directly charged any investment management fees.
Administration:
HSBC serves the Funds as Administrator. Under the terms of the Administration Agreement, HSBC receives from the Funds of the Trusts a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of:
Based on Average Daily Net Assets of | | Fee Rate(%) |
Up to $10 billion | 0.0550 |
In excess of $10 billion but not exceeding $20 billion | 0.0350 |
In excess of $20 billion but not exceeding $50 billion | 0.0275 |
In excess of $50 billion | 0.0250 |
The fee breakpoints are determined on the basis of the aggregate average daily net assets of the Trusts. The fee is allocated to each series based upon its proportionate share of the aggregate net assets of the Trusts. For assets invested in the Portfolios by the Funds, the Portfolios pay half of the administration fee and the Funds pay half, for a combination of the total fee rate above subject to certain reductions associated with services provided to new funds. Certain administration fees of the Portfolios also may be reduced by treating them as apportioned in part to other funds making investments in the Portfolios. An amount equal to 50% of the administration fee is deemed to be class specific.
Pursuant to a Sub-Administration Agreement with HSBC, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., serves as the Trusts’ Sub-Administrator, subject to the general supervision by the Trusts’ Board of Trustees (the “Board’’) and HSBC. For these services, Citi is entitled to a fee, payable by HSBC, at an annual rate equivalent to the fee rates set forth above subject to certain reductions associated with services provided to new funds, minus 0.02% which is retained by HSBC.
Under a Compliance Services Agreement between the Trust and Citi (the “CCO Agreement’’), Citi makes an employee available to serve as the Trusts’ Chief Compliance Officer (the “CCO’’). Under the CCO Agreement, Citi also provides infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Trusts’ compliance program, including support services to the CCO. For the services provided under the CCO Agreement, the Trusts paid Citi $140,088 for the period ended April 30, 2012, plus reimbursement of certain out of pocket expenses. Expenses incurred by each Fund are reflected on the Statements of Operations as “Compliance Service.’’ Citi pays the salary and other compensation earned by individuals performing these services, as employees of Citi.
26 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Distribution Arrangements:
Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. (“Foreside’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foreside Financial Group LLC, serves the Trust as Distributor (the “Distributor’’). The Trust has adopted a non-compensatory Distribution Plan and Agreement (the “Distribution Plan’’) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Act. The Distribution Plan provides for reimbursement of expenses incurred by the Distributor related to distribution and marketing, at a rate not to exceed 0.25%, 1.00%, and 1.00% of the average daily net assets of Class A Shares (currently not being charged), Class B Shares (currently charging 0.75%), and Class C Shares (currently charging 0.75%) of the Funds, respectively. For the period ended April 30, 2012, Foreside, as Distributor, also received $179,432, $158,225 and $17,218 in commissions from sales of the Trusts, for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, and Class C Shares, respectively of which $25, $6 and $- were reallocated to HSBC-affiliated brokers and dealers, for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, and Class C Shares, respectively.
Shareholder Servicing:
The Trust has adopted a Shareholder Services Plan, which provides for payments to shareholder servicing agents (which primarily consist of HSBC and its affiliates) for providing various shareholder services. For performing these services, the shareholder servicing agents receive a fee that is computed daily and paid monthly up to 0.25%, 0.25%, and 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class A Shares, Class B Shares, and Class C Shares of the Funds, respectively. The aggregate fees paid to the Distributor pursuant to the Distribution Plan and to shareholder servicing agents pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan currently are not intended to exceed 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class A Shares, and 1.00% of the average daily net assets of Class B Shares and Class C Shares.
Fund Accounting and Transfer Agency:
Citi provides fund accounting and transfer agency services for each Fund. As transfer agent, Citi receives a fee based on the number of funds and shareholder accounts, subject to certain minimums, reductions associated with services to new funds and reimbursement of certain expenses. As fund accountant, Citi receives an annual fee per series and share class, subject to certain minimums and reimbursement of certain expenses. Citi receives additional fees paid by the Trust and the Advisor Trust for blue sky exemption services.
Independent Trustees:
Prior to January 1, 2012, the Trusts, in the aggregate, paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $63,000, a fee of $5,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended, a fee of $3,000 for each special telephonic meeting attended, and a fee of $5,000 for each special in-person meeting attended. The Trusts also paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $3,000 for each Committee on which such Trustee served as a Committee member as well as a fee of $3,000 for each Committee meeting attended. Additionally, the Trusts paid each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $6,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit Committee, who received a retainer of $8,000. The Trusts also paid Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $20,000, as well as an additional $4,000 for each regular meeting of the Board attended. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee was compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
Effective January 1, 2012, the Trusts pay each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $100,000. The Trusts pay a fee of $10,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended and a fee of $3,000 for each special meeting attended. The Trusts pay each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $3,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit Committee, who receives a retainer of $6,000. The Trusts also pay Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $24,000. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee is compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 27
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Fee Reductions:
The Investment Adviser has agreed to contractually limit, through March 1, 2013, the total expenses, exclusive of interest, taxes, brokerage commissions and extraordinary expenses, of certain Funds. Each affected Fund Class has its own expense limitations based on the average daily net assets for any full fiscal year as follows:
| | | Current Contractual |
| | | Expense |
Fund | | Class | | Limitation(%) |
Growth Fund | A | | 1.20 |
Growth Fund | B | | 1.95 |
Growth Fund | C | | 1.95 |
Growth Fund | I | | 0.95 |
Opportunity Fund | A | | 1.65 |
Opportunity Fund | B | | 2.40 |
Opportunity Fund | C | | 2.40 |
Opportunity Fund (Advisor) | I | | 1.10 |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Investment Adviser will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Investment Adviser within three years to the extent that the repayment will not cause the Fund’s operating expenses to exceed the contractual expense limit was in effect at the time of such waiver or reimbursement. During the period ended April 30, 2012, the Investment Adviser did not recapture any of its prior contractual waivers or reimbursements. As of April 30, 2012, the repayments that may potentially be made by the Funds are as follows:
Fund | | | 2015* | | 2014* | | 2013* | | 2012* | | Total |
Growth Fund | $ | 14,670 | | $ | — | | $ | 22,001 | | $ | 56,048 | | 92,719 |
Opportunity Fund | | 19,094 | | | 27,228 | | | 49,041 | | | 65,792 | | 161,155 |
____________________
* The year listed above the amounts is the fiscal year ending in which the amounts will no longer be able to be recouped.
The Administrator and Citi may voluntarily waive/reimburse fees to help support the expense limits of the Funds. In addition, HSBC, in its role as Investment Adviser and Administrator, may waive/reimburse additional fees at its discretion. Any voluntary fee waivers/reimbursements are not subject to recoupment in subsequent fiscal periods. Voluntary waivers/reimbursements may be stopped at any time. Amounts waived/reimbursed by the Investment Adviser, Administrator and Citi are reported separately on the Statements of Operations, as applicable.
5. Investment Transactions:
Contributions and withdrawals of the respective Portfolios for the period ended April 30, 2012 totaled:
Fund | | Contributions($) | | Withdrawals($) |
Growth Fund | 4,336,773 | | 7,554,695 |
Opportunity Fund | 343,623 | | 1,415,165 |
Opportunity Fund (Advisor) | 10,834,897 | | 11,022,425 |
28 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
6. Federal Income Tax Information:
The tax character of dividends paid by the Funds for the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011 was as follows:
| Dividends paid from |
| | | | | | Net Long Term | | Total |
| Ordinary Income | | Capital Gains | | Dividends Paid* |
Growth Fund | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | |
Opportunity Fund | | | — | | | | | 201,743 | | | | | 201,743 | |
Opportunity Fund (Advisor) | | | — | | | | | 2,935,113 | | | | | 2,935,113 | |
____________________
* | | Total dividends paid may differ from the amount reported in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
As of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis for the Funds were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | Undistributed | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | Total |
| Undistributed | | Undistributed | | Long Term | | | | | | | | | | Capital and | | Unrealized | | Accumulated |
| Ordinary | | Tax Exempt | | Capital | | Accumulated | | Dividends | | Other | | Appreciation/ | | Earnings/ |
| Income | | Income | | Gains | | Earnings | | Payable | | Losses | | (Depreciation)(1) | | (Deficit) |
Growth Fund | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (3,269,773 | ) | | $ | 13,095,032 | | $ | 9,825,259 |
Opportunity Fund | | 122,612 | | | | — | | | | 1,645,882 | | | 1,768,494 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 899,709 | | | 2,668,203 |
Opportunity Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Advisor) | | 2,322,165 | | | | — | | | | 16,364,138 | | | 18,686,303 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,543,895 | | | 28,230,198 |
____________________
(1) | | The differences between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation are attributable primarily to: tax deferral of losses on wash sales, the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains/losses on certain derivative instruments, the difference between book and tax amortization methods for premium and market discount, the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains/losses on investments in passive foreign investment companies, and the return of capital adjustments from real estate investment trusts |
As of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the following Funds have net capital loss carryforwards, which are available to offset future realized gains, if any, to the extent provided by the Treasury regulations. To the extent that these carryforwards are used to offset future capital gains, it is probable that the gains that are offset will not be distributed to shareholders.
Fund | | | Amount($) | | Expires |
Growth Fund | 3,269,773 | | 2017 |
During the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the following Funds utilized capital loss carryforwards to offset capital gains realized:
Fund | | Amount($) |
Growth Fund | 6,478,476 |
The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “RIC Modernization Act”) was signed into law on December 22, 2010. The RIC Modernization Act makes changes to several tax rules impacting the Funds. The provisions of the RIC Modernization Act will generally be effective for each Fund’s tax year ending October 31, 2012. The RIC Modernization Act allows for capital losses originating in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 (“postenactment capital losses”) to be carried forward indefinitely. However, the RIC Modernization Act requires any future capital gains to be first offset by post-enactment capital losses before using capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning prior to the effective date of the RIC Modernization Act. As a result of this ordering rule, capital loss carryforwards incurred in taxable years beginning prior to the effective date of the RIC Modernization Act have an increased likelihood to expire unused. Furthermore, post-enactment capital losses will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term capital losses as under previous law.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 29
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
The RIC Modernization Act also contains provisions which are intended to reduce the circumstances under which a regulated investment company would distribute amounts in excess of such income and gains or be required to file amended tax reporting information to its shareholders and the Internal Revenue Service. Information regarding any further effect of the RIC Modernization Act on the Funds, if any, will be contained within the “Federal Taxes” section of the financial statement notes for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2012.
7. Legal and Regulatory Matters:
On September 26, 2006 BISYS Fund Services, Inc. (“BISYS’’), an affiliate of BISYS Fund Services Ohio, Inc. which provided various services to the Funds, reached a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC’’) regarding the SEC’s investigation related to BISYS’ past payment of certain marketing and other expenses with respect to certain of its mutual fund clients. The related settlement monies were received by the Funds during the year ended October 31, 2010. The corresponding impact to the net income ratio and total return for the year ended October 31, 2010 are disclosed in the Funds’ Financial Highlights.
8. Subsequent Events:
Management has evaluated events and transactions through the date the financial statements were available to be issued, for purposes of recognition or disclosure in these financial statements and there are no subsequent events to report.
30 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Investment Adviser Contract Approval
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), generally requires that a majority of the trustees of a mutual fund who are not parties to an investment advisory agreement for the fund or “interested persons” of the fund, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”) review and approve the investment advisory agreement at an in person meeting for an initial period of up to two years and thereafter on an annual basis. A summary of the material factors considered by the Independent Trustees and the Boards of Trustees (the “Board”) of HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds), HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (each, a “Trust”) in connection with approving investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the series of the Trusts (each, a “Fund”) during the semi-annual period ended April 30, 2012 and the conclusions the Independent Trustees and Board made as a result of those considerations are set forth below.
I. Annual Continuation of Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements
The Board met in person on December 15-16, 2011 and the Contracts and Expense Committee thereof, which consists of the Independent Trustees of the Trusts (the “Contracts Committee”), met on November 29 and December 15, 2011 to consider, among other matters:
- the approval of the continuation of the: (i) Investment Advisory Contracts and related Supplements (“Advisory Contracts”) between the Trusts and HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”) and (ii) Sub-Advisory Agreements (“Sub-Advisory Contracts”) between the Adviser and each investment sub-adviser (“Sub-Adviser”) to one or more Funds; and
- the approval of the continuation of certain other ancillary agreements to which the Adviser is a party that obligate the Adviser to provide the Funds with administrative services, such as the Administration Agreement, Support Services Agreement and Operational Support Services Agreement (each, an “Ancillary Agreement”).
Prior to the meetings, the Independent Trustees received and reviewed the information they thought reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Advisory Contracts, Sub-Advisory Contracts and Ancillary Agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”). This information included, among other things, information about: (i) the services that the Adviser and Sub-Advisers provide; (ii) the personnel who provide such services; (iii) investment performance; (iv) trading practices of the Adviser and Sub-Advisers; (v) fees received or to be received by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, including in comparison with the advisory fees paid by other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vi) total expense ratios, including in comparison with the total expense ratios of other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vii) the profitability of the Adviser and certain of the Sub-Advisers; and (viii) compliance-related matters pertaining to the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. Counsel to the Trusts and to the Independent Trustees were present at each Contracts Committee meeting and the Board meeting. In this regard, counsel to the Independent Trustees advised the Independent Trustees with respect to their deliberations during the process and their fiduciary obligations under Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act.
On November 29, 2011, the Contracts Committee convened and its members reviewed the information provided in advance of the meeting and discussed, among other things: (i) the Administration Agreement; (ii) the Trusts’ arrangements with the Sub-Advisers and the Funds advised by the Sub-Advisers; (iii) the fees and performance record of the Funds that are money market funds (“Money Market Funds”); and (iv) compliance matters. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Committee requested certain additional information from the Adviser with respect to other accounts managed by the Adviser and pricing information regarding certain Funds, among other matters. The Contracts Committee also convened on December 15, 2011 to discuss, among other things: (i) the Adviser’s investment advisory arrangements with respect to the Aggressive Strategy Fund, Balanced Strategy Fund, Conservative Strategy Fund, and Moderate Strategy Fund (collectively, the “World Selection Funds”); (ii) the HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund (formerly, HSBC Investor U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund); (iii) certain subadvisory fee breakpoints; (iv) services provided to the Funds under the Ancillary Agreements; and (v) the Adviser’s response to the follow-up questions posed by the Contracts Committee following the November 29, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting. Following the December 15, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting, the members of the Contracts Committee determined to recommend to the Board, including the Independent Trustees, that the Agreements be continued for an additional one-year period.
At the in-person meeting held on December 15-16, 2011, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed the materials and other information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and considered the previous deliberations and recommendation of the Contracts Committee. As a result of this process, the Board and Independent Trustees determined to approve the continuation of the Agreements with respect to each Fund.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 31
Investment Adviser Contract Approval (continued)
The Board and the Independent Trustees made these determinations on the basis of the following considerations, among others:
Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided by Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees examined the nature, quality and extent of the investment advisory and administrative support services provided by the Adviser to the Funds, as well as the quality and experience of the Adviser’s personnel. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Multimanager unit with respect to the World Selection Funds and the equity Funds, the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Emerging Markets Debt Team with respect to the emerging markets debt Funds, as well as the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s portfolio management and credit review teams with respect to the Money Market Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the nature, quality and extent of the administrative support services that the Adviser provides to the Funds, including the Adviser’s oversight and management of the Funds’ other service providers.
The Independent Trustees also took note of: (i) the long-term relationship between the Adviser and the Funds; (ii) the Adviser’s reputation and financial condition; (iii) the reduction during the period in the HSBC Family of Fund’s net assets; (iv) the liquidation of certain Funds; and (v) the efforts undertaken by the Adviser to foster the growth and development of the Funds since the inception of each of the Funds, including the recent development and launch of the HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund and HSBC Frontier Markets Fund. With respect to the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the financial support the Adviser and its affiliates have afforded the Money Market Funds, such as the fee waivers and reimbursements made to maintain a non-negative yield for the Money Market Funds more recently. In addition, the Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s performance in fulfilling its responsibilities for overseeing its own and the Sub-Advisers’ compliance with the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures and investment objectives.
The Independent Trustees also examined the nature, quality and extent of the services that the Sub-Advisers provide to their respective Funds. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the investment performance and the portfolio risk characteristics achieved by the Sub-Advisers and the Sub-Advisers’ portfolio management teams, their experience, and the quality of their compliance programs, among other factors.
Based on these considerations, the Independent Trustees concluded that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, and that the services provided supported continuance of the Agreements.
Investment Performance of the Funds, Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the investment performance of each Fund over various periods of time, as compared to one another as well as to comparable funds and one or more benchmark indices. In the context of the World Selection Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the relative underperformance of the World Selection Funds in light of data provided by Lipper Inc., and representations by the Adviser regarding market factors that contributed to the relative underperformance, as well as their investment outlook. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Growth Portfolio), the Independent Trustees favorably noted the consistent performance record of the Portfolio. In the context of the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the yield support that the Adviser had provided in order for the Money Market Funds to retain non-negative performance. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds’ investment performance and the Adviser’s actions to improve investment performance, where applicable, supported continuance of the Agreements.
Costs of Services and Profits Realized by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the costs of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and the expense ratios of the Funds more generally. The Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s profitability and costs, including by means of an analysis provided by the Adviser of its estimated profitability attributable to its relationship with the Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts and compared those fees to the fees of similar funds, which had been compiled and provided by Lipper Inc. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds had advisory fees competitive with those of similar funds, noting the resources, expertise and experience provided to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also compared the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts with those of other accounts managed by the Adviser, and evaluated information provided as to why advisory fees may differ between mutual funds and other advisory relationships, including increased shareholder activity. In this regard, the Independent Trustees concluded that differences in advisory fees assessed between the Funds and other accounts managed by the Adviser did not preclude approval of the Advisory Contracts.
32 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS |
|
Investment Adviser Contract Approval (continued) |
With respect to the administrative support services provided by the Adviser, the Independent Trustees considered the fees charged for such services and evaluated the fees payable to the Adviser and those payable to other providers of administrative services to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also considered the costs of the services provided by the Sub-Advisers, as applicable; the relative portions of the total advisory fees paid to the Sub-Advisers and retained by the Adviser in its capacity as the Funds’ investment adviser; and the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio, the Independent Trustees considered the subadvisory fee breakpoint structure. The Independent Trustees also considered information on profitability where provided by the Sub-Advisers.
The Independent Trustees concluded that the advisory fees payable to the Adviser and the Funds’ Sub-Advisers were fair and reasonable in light of the factors set forth above.
Other Relevant Considerations. The Independent Trustees also considered the extent to which the Adviser and Sub-Advisers had achieved economies of scale, whether the Funds’ expense structure permits economies of scale to be shared with the Funds’ shareholders and, if so, the extent to which the Funds’ shareholders may benefit from these economies of scale. The Independent Trustees also noted the contractual caps on certain Fund expenses provided by the Adviser with respect to many of the Funds in order to reduce or control the overall operating expenses of those Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered certain information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers with respect to the benefits they may derive from their relationships with the Funds, including the fact that certain Sub-Advisers have “soft dollar” arrangements with respect to Fund brokerage and therefore may have access to research and other permissible services.
In light of the above considerations and such other factors and information it considered relevant, the Board by a unanimous vote of those present in person at the meeting (including a separate unanimous vote of the Independent Trustees present in person at the meeting) approved the continuation of each Agreement.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 33
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS |
|
Table of Shareholder Expenses—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) |
As a shareholder of the Funds, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases, redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees and/or shareholder servicing fees and other Fund expenses (including expenses allocated from the Portfolios). These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012.
Actual Example
The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
Growth Fund | Class A Shares | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | | $ | 1,125.40 | | | | $ | 6.34 | | | | 1.20 | % | |
| Class B Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,121.00 | | | | | 10.28 | | | | 1.95 | % | |
| Class C Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,120.80 | | | | | 10.28 | | | | 1.95 | % | |
| Class I Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,126.60 | | | | | 5.02 | | | | 0.95 | % | |
Opportunity Fund | Class A Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,134.00 | | | | | 8.22 | | | | 1.55 | % | |
| Class B Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,129.60 | | | | | 12.18 | | | | 2.30 | % | |
| Class C Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,129.00 | | | | | 12.17 | | | | 2.30 | % | |
Opportunity Fund (I Shares) | Class I Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,135.90 | | | | | 5.63 | | | | 1.06 | % | |
____________________
* | | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on each Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees, or exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
Growth Fund | Class A Shares | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | | $ | 1,018.90 | | | | $ | 6.02 | | | | 1.20 | % | |
| Class B Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,015.17 | | | | | 9.77 | | | | 1.95 | % | |
| Class C Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,015.17 | | | | | 9.77 | | | | 1.95 | % | |
| Class I Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,020.14 | | | | | 4.77 | | | | 0.95 | % | |
Opportunity Fund | Class A Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,017.16 | | | | | 7.77 | | | | 1.55 | % | |
| Class B Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,013.43 | | | | | 11.51 | | | | 2.30 | % | |
| Class C Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,013.43 | | | | | 11.51 | | | | 2.30 | % | |
Opportunity Fund (I Shares) | Class I Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,019.59 | | | | | 5.32 | | | | 1.06 | % | |
____________________
* | | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
34 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
HSBC GROWTH PORTFOLIO |
|
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks – 97.1% | | | | |
| | Shares | | Value ($) |
Aerospace & Defense – 2.8% | | | | |
Precision Castparts Corp. | | 5,700 | | 1,005,309 |
United Technologies Corp. | | 19,300 | | 1,575,652 |
| | | | 2,580,961 |
|
Auto Components – 1.2% | | | | |
BorgWarner, Inc.(a) | | 14,700 | | 1,161,888 |
|
Biotechnology – 2.6% | | | | |
Biogen Idec, Inc.(a) | | 10,300 | | 1,380,303 |
Celgene Corp.(a) | | 14,900 | | 1,086,508 |
| | | | 2,466,811 |
|
Capital Markets – 3.3% | | | | |
Franklin Resources, Inc. | | 11,500 | | 1,443,365 |
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. | | 38,900 | | 730,931 |
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | | 7,900 | | 909,685 |
| | | | 3,083,981 |
|
Chemicals – 3.3% | | | | |
Ecolab, Inc. | | 20,100 | | 1,280,169 |
Monsanto Co. | | 23,700 | | 1,805,466 |
| | | | 3,085,635 |
|
Communications Equipment – 3.4% | | | | |
QUALCOMM, Inc. | | 49,700 | | 3,172,848 |
| | | | |
Computers & Peripherals – 9.7% | | | | |
Apple, Inc.(a) | | 9,450 | | 5,521,068 |
EMC Corp.(a) | | 90,600 | | 2,555,826 |
NetApp, Inc.(a) | | 25,500 | | 990,165 |
| | | | 9,067,059 |
|
Construction & Engineering – 1.3% | | | | |
Fluor Corp. | | 21,400 | | 1,235,850 |
| | | | |
Diversified Financial Services – 2.8% | | | | |
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.(a) | | 7,600 | | 1,011,104 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | 36,500 | | 1,568,770 |
| | | | 2,579,874 |
|
Energy Equipment & Services – 2.6% | | | | |
Cameron International Corp.(a) | | 17,400 | | 891,750 |
FMC Technologies, Inc.(a) | | 32,700 | | 1,536,900 |
| | | | 2,428,650 |
|
Food & Staples Retailing – 2.4% | | | | |
Costco Wholesale Corp. | | 11,400 | | 1,005,138 |
CVS Caremark Corp. | | 27,000 | | 1,204,740 |
| | | | 2,209,878 |
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 2.3% | | | | |
Edwards Lifesciences Corp.(a) | | 11,000 | | 912,670 |
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.(a) | | 1,755 | | 1,014,741 |
Varian Medical Systems, Inc.(a) | | 3,500 | | 221,970 |
| | | | 2,149,381 |
| | | | |
Health Care Providers & Services – 4.6% | | | | |
Express Scripts Holding Co.(a) | | 27,750 | | 1,548,172 |
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | | 48,400 | | 2,717,660 |
| | | | 4,265,832 |
|
Health Care Technology – 0.7% | | | | |
Cerner Corp.(a) | | 8,100 | | 656,829 |
| | | | |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 4.7% | | | | |
Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | 34,700 | | 1,925,503 |
Starbucks Corp. | | 26,300 | | 1,509,094 |
Yum! Brands, Inc. | | 13,200 | | 960,036 |
| | | | 4,394,633 |
|
Internet & Catalog Retail – 4.9% | | | | |
Amazon.com, Inc.(a) | | 7,650 | | 1,774,035 |
Priceline.com, Inc.(a) | | 3,685 | | 2,803,622 |
| | | | 4,577,657 |
|
Internet Software & Services – 7.0% | | | | |
Baidu, Inc. ADR(a) | | 12,725 | | 1,688,608 |
eBay, Inc.(a) | | 23,100 | | 948,255 |
Google, Inc., Class A(a) | | 3,610 | | 2,184,880 |
LinkedIn Corp., Class A(a) | | 7,400 | | 802,530 |
VeriSign, Inc. | | 22,600 | | 929,086 |
| | | | 6,553,359 |
|
IT Services – 6.5% | | | | |
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.(a) | | 32,100 | | 2,353,572 |
Teradata Corp.(a) | | 5,200 | | 362,856 |
Visa, Inc., Class A | | 26,900 | | 3,308,162 |
| | | | 6,024,590 |
|
Machinery – 5.5% | | | | |
Caterpillar, Inc. | | 13,400 | | 1,377,118 |
Danaher Corp. | | 51,200 | | 2,776,064 |
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | | 17,100 | | 981,198 |
| | | | 5,134,380 |
|
Media – 0.5% | | | | |
CBS Corp., Class B | | 13,700 | | 456,895 |
|
Metals & Mining – 0.4% | | | | |
Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. | | 6,400 | | 398,464 |
| | | | |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 3.5% | | | | |
Concho Resources, Inc.(a) | | 16,200 | | 1,736,316 |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | 16,500 | | 1,505,130 |
| | | | 3,241,446 |
|
Personal Products – 0.8% | | | | |
The Estee Lauder Cos., Inc., Class A | | 11,800 | | 771,130 |
|
Pharmaceuticals – 1.7% | | | | |
Perrigo Co. | | 5,700 | | 597,930 |
Shire plc ADR | | 10,600 | | 1,034,136 |
| | | | 1,632,066 |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC PORTFOLIOS 35 |
HSBC GROWTH PORTFOLIO |
|
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued) |
Common Stocks, continued | | | |
| Shares | | Value ($) |
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) – 1.7% | | | |
American Tower Corp. | 23,700 | | 1,554,246 |
| | | |
Road & Rail – 3.4% | | | |
Union Pacific Corp. | 28,200 | | 3,170,808 |
| | | |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 0.7% | | |
Altera Corp. | 17,600 | | 626,032 |
|
Software – 7.3% | | | |
Autodesk, Inc.(a) | 22,900 | | 901,573 |
Intuit, Inc. | 15,600 | | 904,332 |
Microsoft Corp. | 40,400 | | 1,293,608 |
Oracle Corp. | 62,300 | | 1,830,997 |
Salesforce.com, Inc.(a) | 11,900 | | 1,853,187 |
| | | 6,783,697 |
|
Specialty Retail – 1.5% | | | |
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.(a) | 8,100 | | 854,226 |
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. | 6,600 | | 581,988 |
| | | 1,436,214 |
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 4.0% | | | |
Coach, Inc. | 12,600 | | 921,816 |
Fossil, Inc.(a) | 6,300 | | 823,221 |
Michael Kors Holdings Ltd.(a) | 10,100 | | 461,267 |
Ralph Lauren Corp. | 8,600 | | 1,481,522 |
| | | 3,687,826 |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | | | |
(COST $69,073,618) | | | 90,588,920 |
| | | |
Investment Company – 2.6% | | | |
Northern Institutional Diversified Assets | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01%(b) | 2,440,887 | | 2,440,887 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT COMPANY | | | |
(COST $2,440,887) | | | 2,440,887 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | | |
(COST $71,514,505) — 99.7% | | | 93,029,807 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $93,344,762. |
|
(a) | Represents non-income producing security. |
(b) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
ADR American Depositary Receipt
36 HSBC PORTFOLIOS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC OPPORTUNITY PORTFOLIO |
|
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks – 95.9% | | | |
| Shares | | Value ($) |
Aerospace & Defense – 4.3% | | | |
BE Aerospace, Inc.(a) | 75,390 | | 3,545,592 |
TransDigm Group, Inc.(a) | 25,100 | | 3,165,612 |
| | | 6,711,204 |
|
Capital Markets – 2.9% | | | |
Lazard Ltd., Class A | 79,490 | | 2,186,770 |
Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 61,210 | | 2,241,510 |
| | | 4,428,280 |
|
Chemicals – 3.5% | | | |
Celanese Corp., Series A | 57,240 | | 2,773,850 |
Westlake Chemical Corp. | 41,865 | | 2,677,267 |
| | | 5,451,117 |
|
Commercial Banks – 3.1% | | | |
Comerica, Inc. | 91,130 | | 2,917,982 |
First Horizon National Corp. | 1 | | 9 |
First Republic Bank(a) | 57,320 | | 1,893,280 |
| | | 4,811,271 |
|
Commercial Services & Supplies – 1.8% | | | |
Waste Connections, Inc. | 84,185 | | 2,713,283 |
|
Communications Equipment – 1.6% | | | |
Comverse Technology, Inc.(a) | 578 | | 3,728 |
JDS Uniphase Corp.(a) | 135,260 | | 1,643,409 |
Polycom, Inc.(a) | 61,300 | | 813,451 |
| | | 2,460,588 |
|
Containers & Packaging – 3.7% | | | |
Crown Holdings, Inc.(a) | 78,370 | | 2,898,122 |
Packaging Corp. of America | 98,040 | | 2,861,788 |
| | | 5,759,910 |
|
Diversified Financial Services – 1.2% | | | |
MSCI, Inc., Class A(a) | 51,750 | | 1,893,533 |
|
Electrical Equipment – 2.7% | | | |
Hubbell, Inc., Class B | 51,990 | | 4,171,678 |
| | | |
Energy Equipment & Services – 3.1% | | | |
Ensco International plc ADR | 35,970 | | 1,965,760 |
Rowan Cos., Inc.(a) | 80,490 | | 2,779,320 |
| | | 4,745,080 |
|
Food Products – 2.7% | | | |
Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.(a) | 56,440 | | 4,109,396 |
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 4.6% | | | |
DENTSPLY International, Inc. | 99,810 | | 4,098,198 |
Hologic, Inc.(a) | 79,410 | | 1,518,319 |
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.(a) | 17,720 | | 1,558,120 |
| | | 7,174,637 |
|
Health Care Providers & Services – 2.2% | | | |
Coventry Health Care, Inc. | 112,530 | | 3,374,775 |
|
Insurance – 2.0% | | | |
Everest Re Group Ltd. | 30,710 | | 3,043,361 |
| | | |
IT Services – 5.2% | | | |
Alliance Data Systems Corp.(a) | 32,520 | | 4,178,495 |
FleetCor Technologies, Inc.(a) | 64,480 | | 2,550,184 |
Syntel, Inc. | 23,140 | | 1,385,854 |
| | | 8,114,533 |
|
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 2.0% | | | |
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc. (a) | 17,340 | | 3,109,409 |
|
Machinery – 7.4% | | | |
Crane Co. | 58,494 | | 2,581,340 |
Gardner Denver, Inc. | 41,640 | | 2,712,430 |
IDEX Corp. | 61,070 | | 2,644,942 |
The Timken Co. | 61,300 | | 3,464,063 |
| | | 11,402,775 |
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 5.3% | | | |
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.(a) | 84,962 | | 1,370,437 |
Denbury Resources, Inc.(a) | 157,120 | | 2,991,565 |
Tesoro Corp.(a) | 168,890 | | 3,926,692 |
| | | 8,288,694 |
|
Personal Products – 1.1% | | | |
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc., Class A | 33,440 | | 1,782,352 |
|
Pharmaceuticals – 2.3% | | | |
Elan Corp. plc ADR(a) | 253,850 | | 3,500,591 |
| | | |
Professional Services – 2.0% | | | |
IHS, Inc., Class A(a) | 30,350 | | 3,067,475 |
|
Real Estate Management & Development – 1.7% | | |
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. | 33,830 | | 2,704,370 |
|
Road & Rail – 5.6% | | | |
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.(a) | 202,820 | | 3,125,456 |
Landstar System, Inc. | 56,570 | | 3,030,455 |
Ryder System, Inc. | 50,360 | | 2,453,539 |
| | | 8,609,450 |
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 4.6% | | |
NXP Semiconductors NV(a) | 62,290 | | 1,610,197 |
ON Semiconductor Corp.(a) | 166,290 | | 1,373,555 |
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.(a) | 78,830 | | 2,139,446 |
Teradyne, Inc.(a) | 115,480 | | 1,987,411 |
| | | 7,110,609 |
|
Software – 3.5% | | | |
Informatica Corp. (a) | 69,850 | | 3,214,497 |
Nuance Communications, Inc.(a) | 91,700 | | 2,241,148 |
| | | 5,455,645 |
|
Specialty Retail – 11.4% | | | |
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | 157,960 | | 2,844,859 |
Foot Locker, Inc. | 159,820 | | 4,888,894 |
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.(a) | 35,050 | | 3,696,373 |
Signet Jewelers Ltd. | 65,940 | | 3,215,894 |
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 76,020 | | 2,941,214 |
| | | 17,587,234 |
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 0.4% | | | |
Michael Kors Holdings Ltd.(a) | 15,130 | | 690,987 |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC PORTFOLIOS 37 |
HSBC OPPORTUNITY PORTFOLIO |
|
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks, continued | | | |
| Shares | | Value ($) |
Trading Companies & Distributors – 3.7% | | | |
United Rentals, Inc.(a) | 66,640 | | 3,110,755 |
WESCO International, Inc.(a) | 39,430 | | 2,617,758 |
| | | 5,728,513 |
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 0.3% | | | |
NII Holdings, Inc.(a) | 33,420 | | 467,713 |
| | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | | | |
(COST $123,944,145) | | | 148,468,463 |
|
Investment Company – 4.0% | | | |
Northern Institutional Government Select | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01%(b) | 6,231,280 | | 6,231,280 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT COMPANY | | | |
(COST $6,231,280) | | | 6,231,280 |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS SECURITIES | | | |
(COST $130,175,425) — 99.9% | | | 154,699,743 |
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $154,887,989. |
|
(a) | Represents non-income producing security. |
(b) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
ADR American Depositary Receipt
38 HSBC PORTFOLIOS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| Growth | | Opportunity |
| Portfolio | | Portfolio |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in non-affiliates, at value | | $ | 93,029,807 | | | | $ | 154,699,743 | |
Dividends receivable | | | 33,302 | | | | | 28,118 | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 1,121,664 | | | | | 2,205,972 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 155 | | | | | 236 | |
Total Assets | | | 94,184,928 | | | | | 156,934,069 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | 776,258 | | | | | 1,934,711 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | 50,282 | | | | | 100,860 | |
Administration | | | 2,558 | | | | | 4,206 | |
Custodian | | | 60 | | | | | 101 | |
Trustee | | | 149 | | | | | 78 | |
Other | | | 10,859 | | | | | 6,124 | |
Total Liabilities | | | 840,166 | | | | | 2,046,080 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Applicable to investors’ beneficial interest | | $ | 93,344,762 | | | | $ | 154,887,989 | |
Total Investments, at cost | | $ | 71,514,505 | | | | $ | 130,175,425 | |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC PORTFOLIOS 39 |
HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Statements of Operations—For the six months ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | Growth | | Opportunity |
| | Portfolio | | Portfolio |
Investment Income: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | | $ | 420,021 | | | | $ | 493,142 | | |
Total Investment Income | | | | 420,021 | | | | | 493,142 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | | 270,926 | | | | | 592,358 | | |
Administration | | | | 14,011 | | | | | 22,186 | | |
Accounting | | | | 22,145 | | | | | 22,058 | | |
Compliance Service | | | | 415 | | | | | 614 | | |
Custodian | | | | 8,162 | | | | | 12,819 | | |
Printing | | | | 1,307 | | | | | 1,909 | | |
Professional | | | | 5,306 | | | | | 7,485 | | |
Trustee | | | | 1,353 | | | | | 1,975 | | |
Other | | | | 4,022 | | | | | 5,383 | | |
Total Expenses | | | | 327,647 | | | | | 666,787 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income (Loss) | | | | 92,374 | | | | | (173,645 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Investments: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investment securities | | | | 8,967,627 | | | | | 7,366,429 | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | | 1,676,015 | | | | | 11,628,065 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized/unrealized gains from investments | | | | 10,643,642 | | | | | 18,994,494 | | |
Change In Net Assets Resulting From Operations | | | $ | 10,736,016 | | | | $ | 18,820,849 | | |
40 HSBC PORTFOLIOS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | Growth | | Opportunity |
| | Portfolio | | Portfolio |
| | For the | | For the | | For the | | For the |
| | six months ended | | year ended | | six months ended | | year ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | | October 31, 2011 |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | | |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | $ | 92,374 | | | | | $ | 69,416 | | | | | $ | (173,645 | ) | | | | $ | 79,759 | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | | 8,967,627 | | | | | | 10,568,671 | | | | | | 7,366,429 | | | | | | 24,005,437 | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
from investments | | | | 1,676,015 | | | | | | 387,197 | | | | | | 11,628,065 | | | | | | (5,303,339 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | | 10,736,016 | | | | | | 11,025,284 | | | | | | 18,820,849 | | | | | | 18,781,857 | | |
Proceeds from contributions | | | | 6,039,296 | | | | | | 20,411,483 | | | | | | 11,789,218 | | | | | | 16,493,895 | | |
Value of withdrawals | | | | (28,719,437 | ) | | | | | (24,898,681 | ) | | | | | (17,046,480 | ) | | | | | (33,352,902 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from transactions from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
investors’ beneficial interest | | | | (22,680,141 | ) | | | | | (4,487,198 | ) | | | | | (5,257,262 | ) | | | | | (16,859,007 | ) | |
Change in net assets | | | | (11,944,125 | ) | | | | | 6,538,086 | | | | | | 13,563,587 | | | | | | 1,922,850 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | | 105,288,887 | | | | | | 98,750,801 | | | | | | 141,324,402 | | | | | | 139,401,552 | | |
End of period | | | $ | 93,344,762 | | | | | $ | 105,288,887 | | | | | $ | 154,887,989 | | | | | $ | 141,324,402 | | |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC PORTFOLIOS 41 |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | Ratio/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios of | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Expenses | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Investment | | to Average | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Net Assets at | | Expenses to | | Income (Loss) | | Net Assets | | | | | |
| | Total | | End of Period | | Average Net | | to Average Net | | (Excluding Fee | | Portfolio |
| | Return(a) | | (000’s) | | Assets(b) | | Assets(b) | | Reductions)(b) | | Turnover(a) |
GROWTH PORTFOLIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | 31.11 | % | | | | $ | 89,686 | | | 0.62% | | | 0.45 | % | | | 0.62% | | | 57 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | (37.75 | )%(c) | | | | | 81,942 | | | 0.62% | | | 0.19 | % | | | 0.62% | | | 158 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | 19.31 | % | | | | | 88,163 | | | 0.69% | | | 0.17 | % | | | 0.69% | | | 66 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | 20.34 | % | | | | | 98,751 | | | 0.68% | | | (0.04 | )% | | | 0.68% | | | 89 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | 11.07 | % | | | | | 105,289 | | | 0.66% | | | 0.07 | % | | | 0.66% | | | 56 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | 12.80 | % | | | | | 93,345 | | | 0.70% | | | 0.20 | % | | | 0.70% | | | 20 | % | |
OPPORTUNITY PORTFOLIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | 30.54 | % | | | | $ | 224,268 | | | 0.91% | | | (0.55 | )% | | | 0.91% | | | 69 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | (35.30 | )% | | | | | 127,970 | | | 0.87% | | | (0.46 | )% | | | 0.87% | | | 80 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | 15.41 | % | | | | | 129,748 | | | 0.90% | | | (0.37 | )% | | | 0.90% | | | 65 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | 28.74 | % | | | | | 139,402 | | | 0.89% | | | (0.35 | )% | | | 0.89% | | | 68 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | 12.40 | % | | | | | 141,324 | | | 0.88% | | | 0.05 | % | | | 0.88% | | | 69 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | 13.71 | % | | | | | 154,888 | | | 0.90% | | | (0.23 | )% | | | 0.90% | | | 32 | % | |
(a) | Not annualized for period less than one year. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | During the year ended October 31, 2008, Winslow Capital Management, Inc. reimbursed $64,658 to the Growth Portfolio related to violations of certain investment policies and limitations. The corresponding impact to total return was 0.08%. |
42 HSBC PORTFOLIOS | See notes to financial statements. |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
1. Organization:
The HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (the “Portfolio Trust’’), is an open-end management investment company organized as a New York trust under the laws of the State of New York on November 1, 1994. The Portfolio Trust contains the following master funds (individually a “Portfolio,’’ collectively the “Portfolios’’):
Portfolio | | | Short Name | |
HSBC Growth Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Growth Portfolio) | | Growth Portfolio |
HSBC Opportunity Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Opportunity Portfolio) | | Opportunity Portfolio |
The Portfolios operate as master funds in master-feeder arrangements, in which other funds invest all or part of their investable assets in the Portfolios. The Portfolios also receive investments from funds of funds. The Declaration of Trust permits the Board of Trustees (the “Board’’) to issue an unlimited number of beneficial interests in the Portfolios.
The Portfolios are diversified series of the Portfolio Trust and are part of the HSBC Family of Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Family of Funds), which also includes HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds) collectively (the “Trusts’’). Financial statements for all other funds of the Trusts are published separately.
Under the Portfolio Trust’s organizational documents, the Portfolio Trust’s officers and Trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolios. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio Trust may enter into contracts with its service providers, which also provide for indemnifications by the Portfolios. The Portfolios’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve any future claims that may be made against the Portfolios. However, based on experience, the Portfolio Trust expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies:
The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Portfolios in the preparation of their financial statements. The policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP’’). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities Valuation:
The Portfolios record their investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 3 below.
Investment Transactions and Related Income:
Investment transactions are accounted for not later than on business day after trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Investment gains and losses are calculated on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization or accretion of premium or discount. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Expense Allocations:
Expenses directly attributable to a Portfolio are charged to that Portfolio. Expenses not directly attributable to a Portfolio are allocated proportionally among the applicable portfolios or funds within the HSBC Family of Funds in relation to net assets or on another reasonable basis.
HSBC PORTFOLIOS 43
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Federal Income Taxes:
Each Portfolio will be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, each Portfolio passes through all of its net investment income and gains and losses to its feeder funds, and is therefore not subject to U.S. federal income tax. As such, investors in the Portfolios will be taxed on their respective share of the Portfolios’ ordinary income and realized gains. It is intended that the Portfolios will be managed in such a way that an investor will be able to satisfy the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies.
Management of the Portfolios has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
3. Investment Valuation Summary:
The valuation techniques employed by the Portfolios, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Portfolios’ investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
- Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
- Level 2: other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
- Level 3: significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Exchange traded, domestic equity securities are valued at the last sale price on a national securities exchange, or in the absence of recorded sales, at the readily available closing bid price on such exchanges, or at the quoted bid price in the over-the-counter market and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Shares of exchange traded and closed-end registered investment companies are valued in the same manner as other equity securities and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Mutual funds are valued at their net asset values, as reported by such companies and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Repurchase agreements are valued at original cost and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Securities or other assets for which market quotations are not readily available, or are deemed unreliable due to a significant event, are valued pursuant to procedures adopted by the Trusts’ Board (“Procedures”). Depending on the source and relative significance of valuation inputs, these instruments may be classified as Level 2 or Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Examples of potentially significant events that could affect the value of an individual security and thus require pricing under the procedures include corporate actions by the issuer, announcements by the issuer relating to its earnings or products, regulatory news, natural disasters, and litigation. Examples of potentially significant events that could affect multiple securities held by a Portfolio include governmental actions, natural disasters, and armed conflicts.
For the period ended April 30, 2012, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
44 HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of April 30, 2012 in valuing the Portfolios’ investments based upon three levels defined above:
| | LEVEL 1 ($) | | LEVEL 2 ($) | | LEVEL 3 ($) | | Total ($) |
| Growth Portfolio | | | | | | | |
| Investment Securities: | | | | | | | |
| Common Stocks (a) | 90,588,920 | | — | | — | | 90,588,920 |
| Investment Company | 2,440,887 | | — | | — | | 2,440,887 |
| Total Investment Securities | 93,029,807 | | — | | — | | 93,029,807 |
| Opportunity Portfolio | | | | | | | |
| Investment Securities: | | | | | | | |
| Common Stocks (a) | 148,468,463 | | — | | — | | 148,468,463 |
| Investment Company | 6,231,280 | | — | | — | | 6,231,280 |
| Total Investment Securities | 154,699,743 | | — | | — | | 154,699,743 |
| ____________________ | | | | | | | |
| (a) | | For detailed investment categorizations, see the accompanying Schedules of Portfolio Investments. |
The Portfolio Trust recognizes significant transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. There were no significant transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 as of April 30, 2012 from the valuation input levels used on October 31, 2011.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04 (“ASU 2011-04”), “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS”. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 will have no effect on each Portfolio’s net assets. At this time, management is evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2011-04 on the financial statement disclosures.
4. Related Party Transactions and Other Agreements:
Investment Management:
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (“HSBC’’ or the “Investment Adviser’’), a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC Bank USA, N.A., a national bank organized under the laws of the United States, acts as the Investment Adviser to the Portfolios pursuant to an investment management contract with the Portfolio Trust. As Investment Adviser, HSBC manages the investments of the Portfolios and continuously reviews, supervises, and administers the Portfolios’ investments. Winslow Capital Management, Inc. (“Winslow’’) and Westfield Capital Management Company, L.P. (“Westfield’’) serve as subadvisers for the Growth Portfolio and Opportunity Portfolio, and are paid for their services directly by the respective Portfolios.
For their services, the Investment Adviser and Winslow receive in aggregate, from the Growth Portfolio, a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of:
| Based on Average Daily Net Assets of all Sub-Adviser serviced funds and separate accounts affiliated with HSBC: | | Fee Rate(%)* |
| Up to $250 million | | 0.575 |
| In excess of $250 million but not exceeding $500 million | | 0.525 |
| In excess of $500 million but not exceeding $750 million | | 0.475 |
| In excess of $750 million but not exceeding $1 billion | | 0.425 |
| In excess of $1 billion | | 0.375 |
| ____________________ | | |
| * | | The Growth Portfolio may pay the Investment Adviser and Winslow an aggregate maximum fee of up to 0.68%. Currently, the Investment Adviser’s contractual fee is 0.175% and Winslow’s maximum contractual fee is 0.40%. Accordingly, the current aggregate maximum fee rate is 0.575%. |
HSBC PORTFOLIOS 45
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
For their services, the Investment Adviser and Westfield receive in aggregate, a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of 0.80% of the Opportunity Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Any voluntary fee waivers/reimbursements are not subject to recoupment in subsequent fiscal periods. Voluntary waiver/reimbursements may be stopped at any time.
Administration:
HSBC serves the Trusts as Administrator. Under the terms of the Administration Agreement, HSBC receives from the Trusts a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of:
Based on Average Daily Net Assets of | | | Fee Rate(%) |
Up to $10 billion | | 0.0550 |
In excess of $10 billion but not exceeding $20 billion | | 0.0350 |
In excess of $20 billion but not exceeding $50 billion | | 0.0275 |
In excess of $50 billion | | 0.0250 |
The fee rates and breakpoints are determined on the basis of the aggregate average daily net assets of the Trusts, however, the assets of the Portfolios and HSBC Funds and HSBC Advisor Fund that invest in the Portfolios are not double-counted. The total administration fee paid to HSBC is allocated to each series based upon its proportionate share of the aggregate net assets of the Trusts. For assets invested in the Portfolios by the HSBC Funds and HSBC Advisor Fund, the Portfolios pay half of the administration fee and the other funds pay half of the administration fee, for a combination of the total fee rate set forth above.
Pursuant to a Sub-Administration Agreement with HSBC, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., serves as the Trusts’ Sub-Administrator subject to the general supervision by the Trusts’ Board and HSBC. For these services, Citi is entitled to a fee, payable by HSBC, at an annual rate equivalent to the fee rates set forth above subject to certain reductions associated with services provided to new portfolios, minus 0.02% which is retained by HSBC.
Under a Compliance Services Agreement between the Trusts and Citi (the “CCO Agreement’’), Citi makes an employee available to serve as the Trusts’ Chief Compliance Officer (the “CCO’’). Under the CCO Agreement, Citi also provides infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Trusts’ compliance program, including support services to the CCO. For the services provided under the CCO Agreement, the Trusts paid Citi $140,088 for the period ended April 30, 2012, plus reimbursement of certain expenses. Expenses incurred by each Portfolio are reflected on the Statements of Operations as “Compliance Services.’’ Citi pays the salary and other compensation earned by individuals as employees of Citi.
Fund Accounting:
Citi provides fund accounting services for the Portfolio Trust. For its services to the Portfolios, Citi receives an annual fee per portfolio, including reimbursement of certain expenses, that is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Independent Trustees:
Prior to January 1, 2012, the Trusts, in the aggregate, paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $63,000, a fee of $5,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended, a fee of $3,000 for each special telephonic meeting attended, and a fee of $5,000 for each special in-person meeting attended. The Trusts also paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $3,000 for each Committee on which such Trustee served as a Committee member as well as a fee of $3,000 for each Committee meeting attended. Additionally, the Trusts paid each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $6,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit Committee, who received a retainer of $8,000. The Trusts also paid Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $20,000, as well as an additional $4,000 for each regular meeting of the Board attended. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee was compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
Effective January 1, 2012, the Trusts pay each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $100,000. The Trusts pay a fee of $10,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended and a fee of $3,000 for each special meeting attended. The Trusts pay each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $3,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit
46 HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Committee, who receives a retainer of $6,000. The Trusts also pay Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $24,000. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee is compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
5. Investment Transactions:
Cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) for the period ended April 30, 2012 were as follows:
| Portfolio Name | | | Purchases | | Sales |
| Growth Portfolio | | $ | 18,837,965 | | $ | 40,532,187 |
| Opportunity Portfolio | | | 46,007,974 | | | 51,825,486 |
For the period ended April 30, 2012, there were no long-term U.S. government securities held by the Portfolio Trust.
6. Federal Income Tax Information:
At April 30, 2012, the cost basis of securities for federal income tax purposes, gross unrealized appreciation, gross unrealized depreciation and net unrealized appreciation/depreciation were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | Net Unrealized |
| | | | | Tax Unrealized | | Tax Unrealized | | Appreciation/ |
| Fund | | | Tax Cost($) | | Appreciation($) | | Depreciation($) | | (Depreciation)($)* |
| Growth Portfolio | | 68,243,244 | | 25,426,536 | | | (639,973) | | | 24,786,563 |
| Opportunity Portfolio | | 132,084,921 | | 29,229,252 | | | (6,614,430) | | | 22,614,822 |
| ____________________ | | | | | | | | | | |
| * The difference between book-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
7. Subsequent Events:
Management has evaluated events and transactions through the date the financial statements were available to be issued, for purposes of recognition or disclosure in these financial statements and there are no subsequent events to report.
HSBC PORTFOLIOS 47
Investment Adviser Contract Approval
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), generally requires that a majority of the trustees of a mutual fund who are not parties to an investment advisory agreement for the fund or “interested persons” of the fund, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”) review and approve the investment advisory agreement at an in person meeting for an initial period of up to two years and thereafter on an annual basis. A summary of the material factors considered by the Independent Trustees and the Boards of Trustees (the “Board”) of HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds), HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (each, a “Trust”) in connection with approving investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the series of the Trusts (each, a “Fund”) during the semi-annual period ended April 30, 2012 and the conclusions the Independent Trustees and Board made as a result of those considerations are set forth below.
I. Annual Continuation of Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements
The Board met in person on December 15-16, 2011 and the Contracts and Expense Committee thereof, which consists of the Independent Trustees of the Trusts (the “Contracts Committee”), met on November 29 and December 15, 2011 to consider, among other matters:
- the approval of the continuation of the: (i) Investment Advisory Contracts and related Supplements (“Advisory Contracts”) between the Trusts and HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”) and (ii) Sub-Advisory Agreements (“Sub-Advisory Contracts”) between the Adviser and each investment sub-adviser (“Sub-Adviser”) to one or more Funds; and
- the approval of the continuation of certain other ancillary agreements to which the Adviser is a party that obligate the Adviser to provide the Funds with administrative services, such as the Administration Agreement, Support Services Agreement and Operational Support Services Agreement (each, an “Ancillary Agreement”).
Prior to the meetings, the Independent Trustees received and reviewed the information they thought reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Advisory Contracts, Sub-Advisory Contracts and Ancillary Agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”). This information included, among other things, information about: (i) the services that the Adviser and Sub-Advisers provide; (ii) the personnel who provide such services; (iii) investment performance; (iv) trading practices of the Adviser and Sub-Advisers; (v) fees received or to be received by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, including in comparison with the advisory fees paid by other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vi) total expense ratios, including in comparison with the total expense ratios of other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vii) the profitability of the Adviser and certain of the Sub-Advisers; and (viii) compliance-related matters pertaining to the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. Counsel to the Trusts and to the Independent Trustees were present at each Contracts Committee meeting and the Board meeting. In this regard, counsel to the Independent Trustees advised the Independent Trustees with respect to their deliberations during the process and their fiduciary obligations under Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act.
On November 29, 2011, the Contracts Committee convened and its members reviewed the information provided in advance of the meeting and discussed, among other things: (i) the Administration Agreement; (ii) the Trusts’ arrangements with the Sub-Advisers and the Funds advised by the Sub-Advisers; (iii) the fees and performance record of the Funds that are money market funds (“Money Market Funds”); and (iv) compliance matters. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Committee requested certain additional information from the Adviser with respect to other accounts managed by the Adviser and pricing information regarding certain Funds, among other matters. The Contracts Committee also convened on December 15, 2011 to discuss, among other things: (i) the Adviser’s investment advisory arrangements with respect to the Aggressive Strategy Fund, Balanced Strategy Fund, Conservative Strategy Fund, and Moderate Strategy Fund (collectively, the “World Selection Funds”); (ii) the HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund (formerly, HSBC Investor U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund); (iii) certain subadvisory fee breakpoints; (iv) services provided to the Funds under the Ancillary Agreements; and (v) the Adviser’s response to the follow-up questions posed by the Contracts Committee following the November 29, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting. Following the December 15, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting, the members of the Contracts Committee determined to recommend to the Board, including the Independent Trustees, that the Agreements be continued for an additional one-year period.
At the in-person meeting held on December 15-16, 2011, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed the materials and other information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and considered the previous deliberations and recommendation of the Contracts Committee. As a result of this process, the Board and Independent Trustees determined to approve the continuation of the Agreements with respect to each Fund.
48 HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Investment Adviser Contract Approval (continued)
The Board and the Independent Trustees made these determinations on the basis of the following considerations, among others:
Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided by Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees examined the nature, quality and extent of the investment advisory and administrative support services provided by the Adviser to the Funds, as well as the quality and experience of the Adviser’s personnel. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Multimanager unit with respect to the World Selection Funds and the equity Funds, the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Emerging Markets Debt Team with respect to the emerging markets debt Funds, as well as the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s portfolio management and credit review teams with respect to the Money Market Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the nature, quality and extent of the administrative support services that the Adviser provides to the Funds, including the Adviser’s oversight and management of the Funds’ other service providers.
The Independent Trustees also took note of: (i) the long-term relationship between the Adviser and the Funds; (ii) the Adviser’s reputation and financial condition; (iii) the reduction during the period in the HSBC Family of Fund’s net assets; (iv) the liquidation of certain Funds; and (v) the efforts undertaken by the Adviser to foster the growth and development of the Funds since the inception of each of the Funds, including the recent development and launch of the HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund and HSBC Frontier Markets Fund. With respect to the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the financial support the Adviser and its affiliates have afforded the Money Market Funds, such as the fee waivers and reimbursements made to maintain a non-negative yield for the Money Market Funds more recently. In addition, the Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s performance in fulfilling its responsibilities for overseeing its own and the Sub-Advisers’ compliance with the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures and investment objectives.
The Independent Trustees also examined the nature, quality and extent of the services that the Sub-Advisers provide to their respective Funds. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the investment performance and the portfolio risk characteristics achieved by the Sub-Advisers and the Sub-Advisers’ portfolio management teams, their experience, and the quality of their compliance programs, among other factors.
Based on these considerations, the Independent Trustees concluded that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, and that the services provided supported continuance of the Agreements.
Investment Performance of the Funds, Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the investment performance of each Fund over various periods of time, as compared to one another as well as to comparable funds and one or more benchmark indices. In the context of the World Selection Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the relative underperformance of the World Selection Funds in light of data provided by Lipper Inc., and representations by the Adviser regarding market factors that contributed to the relative underperformance, as well as their investment outlook. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Growth Portfolio), the Independent Trustees favorably noted the consistent performance record of the Portfolio. In the context of the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the yield support that the Adviser had provided in order for the Money Market Funds to retain non-negative performance. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds’ investment performance and the Adviser’s actions to improve investment performance, where applicable, supported continuance of the Agreements.
Costs of Services and Profits Realized by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the costs of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and the expense ratios of the Funds more generally. The Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s profitability and costs, including by means of an analysis provided by the Adviser of its estimated profitability attributable to its relationship with the Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts and compared those fees to the fees of similar funds, which had been compiled and provided by Lipper Inc. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds had advisory fees competitive with those of similar funds, noting the resources, expertise and experience provided to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also compared the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts with those of other accounts managed by the Adviser, and evaluated information provided as to why advisory fees may differ between mutual funds and other advisory relationships, including increased shareholder activity. In this regard, the Independent Trustees concluded that differences in advisory fees assessed between the Funds and other accounts managed by the Adviser did not preclude approval of the Advisory Contracts.
HSBC PORTFOLIOS 49
Investment Adviser Contract Approval (continued)
With respect to the administrative support services provided by the Adviser, the Independent Trustees considered the fees charged for such services and evaluated the fees payable to the Adviser and those payable to other providers of administrative services to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also considered the costs of the services provided by the Sub-Advisers, as applicable; the relative portions of the total advisory fees paid to the Sub-Advisers and retained by the Adviser in its capacity as the Funds’ investment adviser; and the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio, the Independent Trustees considered the subadvisory fee breakpoint structure. The Independent Trustees also considered information on profitability where provided by the Sub-Advisers.
The Independent Trustees concluded that the advisory fees payable to the Adviser and the Funds’ Sub-Advisers were fair and reasonable in light of the factors set forth above.
Other Relevant Considerations. The Independent Trustees also considered the extent to which the Adviser and Sub-Advisers had achieved economies of scale, whether the Funds’ expense structure permits economies of scale to be shared with the Funds’ shareholders and, if so, the extent to which the Funds’ shareholders may benefit from these economies of scale. The Independent Trustees also noted the contractual caps on certain Fund expenses provided by the Adviser with respect to many of the Funds in order to reduce or control the overall operating expenses of those Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered certain information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers with respect to the benefits they may derive from their relationships with the Funds, including the fact that certain Sub-Advisers have “soft dollar” arrangements with respect to Fund brokerage and therefore may have access to research and other permissible services.
In light of the above considerations and such other factors and information it considered relevant, the Board by a unanimous vote of those present in person at the meeting (including a separate unanimous vote of the Independent Trustees present in person at the meeting) approved the continuation of each Agreement.
50 HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Table of Shareholder Expenses—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Portfolios, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees and other Fund expenses.
These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolios and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012.
Actual Example
The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
| Growth Portfolio | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | | $ | 1,128.00 | | | | $ | 3.70 | | | 0.70 | % |
| Opportunity Portfolio | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,137.10 | | | | | 4.78 | | | 0.90 | % |
____________________
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Portfolio’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on each Portfolio’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Portfolio’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees, or exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
| Growth Portfolio | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | | $ | 1,021.38 | | | | $ | 3.52 | | | 0.70 | % |
| Opportunity Portfolio | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,020.39 | | | | | 4.52 | | | 0.90 | % |
____________________
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Portfolio’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
HSBC PORTFOLIOS 51
Other Information:
Information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-525-5757 for HSBC Bank USA and HSBC Brokerage (USA) Inc. clients and 1-800-782-8183 for all other shareholders; (ii) on the Funds’ website at www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com; and (iii) on the Security and Exchange Commission’s (“Commission”) website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Funds file their complete schedules of portfolio holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds’ Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Funds’ Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The Funds’ Schedules of Investments will be available no later than 60 days after each period end, without charge, on the Funds’ website at www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com.
An investment in a Fund is not a deposit of HSBC Bank USA, National Association, and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.
52 HSBC PORTFOLIOS
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS: INVESTMENT ADVISER AND ADMINISTRATOR HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 SUB-ADVISERS HSBC Growth Portfolio Winslow Capital Management, Inc. 4720 IDS Tower 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 HSBC Opportunity Portfolio Westfield Capital Management Company, L.P. One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111 | SHAREHOLDER SERVICING AGENTS For HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. Clients HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 1-888-525-5757 For All Other Shareholders HSBC Funds P.O. Box 182845 Columbus, OH 43218 1-800-782-8183 TRANSFER AGENT Citi Fund Services 3435 Stelzer Road Columbus, OH 43219 DISTRIBUTOR Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. 690 Taylor Road, Suite 150 Gahanna, OH 43230 CUSTODIAN The Northern Trust Company 50 South LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60603 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM KPMG LLP 191 West Nationwide Blvd., Suite 500 Columbus, OH 43215 LEGAL COUNSEL Dechert LLP 1775 I Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb3ae/fb3ae438ac4e9556aacc1b065ed91acd4c8a5fd7" alt=""
The HSBC Family of Funds are distributed by Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. This document must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus for the HSBC Funds, which you should read carefully before you invest or send money.
— NOT FDIC INSURED | — NO BANK GUARANTEE | — MAY LOSE VALUE |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75c7c/75c7cda1f223d5f7ece6dbd4fbcacceb07822b20" alt=""
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. April 30, 2012 |
HSBC World Selection Funds
Semi-Annual Report
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Aggressive Strategy Fund | | HAAGX | | HBAGX | | HCAGX |
Balanced Strategy Fund | | HAGRX | | HSBGX | | HCGRX |
Moderate Strategy Fund | | HSAMX | | HSBMX | | HSCMX |
Conservative Strategy Fund | | HACGX | | HBCGX | | HCCGX |
Income Strategy Fund | | HINAX | | HINBX | | HINCX |
HSBC World Selection Funds
Semi-Annual Report - April 30, 2012
Glossary of Terms | |
Chairman’s Message | 4 |
President’s Message | 6 |
Commentary From the Investment Manager | 7 |
Portfolio Reviews | 8 |
Schedules of Portfolio Investments | |
Aggressive Strategy Fund | 18 |
Balanced Strategy Fund | 19 |
Moderate Strategy Fund | 20 |
Conservative Strategy Fund | 21 |
Income Strategy Fund | 22 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | 24 |
Statements of Operations | 25 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 26 |
Financial Highlights | 32 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 37 |
Investment Adviser Contract Approval | 45 |
Table of Shareholder Expenses | 49 |
|
HSBC Portfolios | |
Schedules of Portfolio Investments | |
HSBC Growth Portfolio | 52 |
HSBC Opportunity Portfolio | 54 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | 56 |
Statements of Operations | 57 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 58 |
Financial Highlights | 59 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 60 |
Investment Adviser Contract Approval | 65 |
Table of Shareholder Expenses | 68 |
Other Information | 69 |
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index is an unmanaged index that tracks the performance of USD-denominated, below investment grade corporate debt publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market.
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index generally representative of investment-grade, fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year.
Barclays Capital U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index is an unmanaged index that measures the non-investment grade, USD-denominated, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high-yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. The index excludes emerging markets debt.
Citigroup U.S. Domestic 3-Month Treasury Bill Index is an unmanaged market value-weighted index of public obligations of the U.S. Treasury with maturities of three months.
Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is an unmanaged free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of the following 22 developed market countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets (“MSCI EM”) Index is an unmanaged free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. The MSCI EM Index consists of the following 21 emerging market countries: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey.
Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index is an unmanaged index that is widely regarded as a gauge of the U.S. equities market. This index includes 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. The S&P 500 Index focuses on the large-cap segment of the market, with approximately 75% coverage of U.S. equities.
Securities indices assume reinvestment of all distributions and interest payments and do not take in account brokerage fees or expenses. Securities in the Funds do not match those in the indices and performance of the Funds will differ. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
June 11, 2012
To Our Investors:
Investors today face a number of troubling macroeconomic issues, including a U.S. economy still struggling to recover from the widespread global downturn that began more than four years ago. Despite modest improvements in certain areas, such as the housing market and corporate profits, the economy still faced major headwinds, particularly from continued weakness in the U.S. job market. A lack of clarity on the economic outlook has led to considerable volatility in the markets: Stocks seem to rally strongly one week only to falter and shed those gains the following week. Meanwhile, conservative assets such as Treasury and money market securities have seen yields fall to historically low levels. These low yields are due in part to Federal Reserve actions designed to keep interest rates low in hopes of jumpstarting the economy.
Europe’s debt woes also are a significant source of worry for investors today. Concerns are mounting that efforts by the European Central Bank and eurozone governments to rein in the region’s debt crisis have been insufficient, and that the specter of economic recession and even default continues to loom over the region. Meanwhile governments in Europe face pressures to address their debt issues while curbing spending. It is unclear how the European debt crisis will play out, but we expect that it may take several years for these issues to unwind.
We are keeping a close watch on potential regulatory changes in the money markets. In response to a period of market illiquidity and disruptions in 2008, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has engaged in an ongoing examination of the money market fund model to determine whether changes are needed. That initiative led to rule changes in 2010, and the possibility of more changes to protect money market funds from the risk of broad-based, large-scale redemptions. Two options under consideration would impose capital requirements and limitations or fees on redemptions, among other restrictions.
The money market fund industry has expressed concerns with these proposals, and it appears that there is insufficient support for additional money market fund reforms among the five SEC commissioners. However, there is the possibility that the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) may intervene in the matter if the SEC does not adopt additional reforms. Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, who is a member of the FSOC, recently expressed his support for increased regulation of money market funds.
At this point, it is not possible to predict where this debate will end and what reform, if any, will ultimately be adopted. We will continue to monitor reform proposals as we work to provide the best money market fund structures and products to meet the needs of our shareholders.
Assets in our money market funds continue to decline due in large part to the historically low yields available in the money markets. HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc., the Funds’ investment advisor, along with the Funds’ other service providers provided yield support of approximately $9.9 million, during the six months’ ended April 30, 2012, to the HSBC Money Market Funds.
4 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Chairman’s Message (continued) |
We are pleased to introduce two new funds in this semi-annual report. The HSBC World Selection Income Strategy Fund and the HSBC Total Return Fund. The Income Strategy Fund seeks to provide current income by investing primarily in underlying funds by utilizing a “fund of funds” structure. The Total Return Fund seeks to maximize total return which is comprised of capital appreciation and income. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing its assets in issuers that are economically tied to emerging market countries.
During the period, due to small asset bases and dwindling investor demand, we liquidated the HSBC Investor Value Fund, the HSBC Investor International Equity and the HSBC Investor Overseas Equity Fund. We continue to review the fund offerings of the HSBC Fund Family to meet the needs of our clients.
Cordially,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6246/a62468f64f6314f48cb50057a03207b8e993d088" alt=""
Michael Seely
Chairman, HSBC Funds
This literature must be preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus for the HSBC Funds. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment company carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company. To obtain more information, for clients of HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., please call 1-888-525-5757 or visit www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com. For other investors and prospective investors, please call the Funds directly at 1-888-936-4722 or visit or www.emfunds.us.hsbc.com. Investors should read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 5
Dear Shareholder,
Welcome to the HSBC Funds semi-annual report, covering the period between November 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012. This report offers detailed information about your Funds’ investment results. We encourage you to review it carefully.
Inside these pages you will find a letter from the Funds’ Chairman, Michael Seely, in which he comments on recent market developments. The report also includes commentary from the Funds’ portfolio managers in which they discuss the investment markets and their respective Fund’s performance. Each commentary may also be accompanied by the Fund’s return for the period, listed alongside the returns of its benchmark index and peer group average for comparative purposes.
On March 20 of this year we launched the World Selection Income Strategy Fund. This Fund adds an income-oriented strategy to the World Selection suite of funds, which includes the Aggressive Strategy, Balanced Strategy, Moderate Strategy, and Conservative Strategy Funds.
On March 30, we also launched the HSBC Total Return Fund. The launch of this fund further expands on our offerings in the emerging markets – one of HSBC’s core strengths. The Total Return Fund joins the Emerging Markets Debt Fund, the Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund, and the Frontier Markets Fund as our initial fund offerings in this exciting segment of the investment market
In closing, we would like to thank you for investing through the HSBC Funds. We continue to focus the HSBC Fund Family on long-term investment solutions to assist our customers in reaching their financial goals. We appreciate the trust you place in us, and will continue working to earn it. Please contact us at any time with questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Richard A. Fabietti
President
6 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Commentary From the Investment Manager |
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc.
U.S. Economic Review
The global economy’s recovery from a historic downturn regained momentum during the six-month period between November 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012 after slowing throughout much of 2011. Moderate economic growth was fueled by increased consumer confidence, improved U.S. economic data, continued strength in emerging economies and better-than-expected corporate earnings. The economic recovery continued to benefit from the Federal Reserve Board’s pledge to maintain the federal funds rate—a key factor in lending rates—at a historically low target range between 0.00% and 0.25% through 2014.
As the period began, ongoing concerns about the eurozone debt crisis continued to fuel fears of a new global recession. However, financial markets underwent a significant shift from the volatile and bearish events of the previous six months. Fears about Europe began to subside somewhat during the first months of 2012, due in part to efforts by the European Central Bank (ECB) to stabilize the region’s banking system through infusions of capital. Meanwhile, moderate economic growth in the U.S. and, although slowing, still relatively strong growth in emerging markets helped assuage fears of a global economic downturn.
The ECB efforts to stem a liquidity crisis in European nations during the period helped alleviate fears of deepening credit problems in the eurozone. In December, the ECB began distributing inexpensive loans to European banks as part of its long-term refinancing operation (LTRO) and in March began making similar loans from an even larger pool of funds. The LTRO appeared to stabilize financial markets in the short term, but significant uncertainties remained regarding the long-term prospects of peripheral European economies to regain their competitiveness and avoid the threat of defaults. The ability of countries such as Italy, Greece and Spain to regain the confidence of the markets remained in doubt, and the long-term impact of austerity programs on economic growth also raised concerns.
Growth remained robust in many emerging economies during the period, and inflation, which had been a significant concern in previous months, eased in some nations. Economic growth in China slowed due to declining exports and industrial production as well as low levels of lending. But most signs indicated that robust domestic demand would prevent a “hard landing” for the Chinese economy. Oil prices eased somewhat during the period.
U.S. Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”)1 grew at 3.0% during the fourth quarter of 2011, a significant increase from the previous quarter. A preliminary estimate puts GDP during the first quarter at 1.9%. Job creation was robust during much of the period, and jobless claims continued a generally downward trend. However, unemployment remained relatively high. The housing market showed signs of improvement. Home sales began to stabilize and inventories began to decrease. Meanwhile, encouraging economic data bolstered the recovery. Reports showed that motor vehicle sales were strong, U.S. exports had accelerated and industrial production had increased.
Market Review
The period began with the final stretch of a sell-off in U.S. equity markets that had begun in mid-summer. After bottoming out in late November, equities changed direction with a strong rally that persisted through the duration of the period. Equities’ strong performance during the period was supported by increased optimism that the U.S. would avoid a “double dip” recession—a threat that preoccupied investors in 2011. During the period, stocks in cyclical sectors tended to perform best, while more defensive sectors lagged behind.
Stocks in other developed economies rose, too. Japanese equities performed especially well due to a strong economic rebound during the first quarter of 2012. European stocks made gains, but lagged behind U.S. markets. The S&P 500 Index1 of large-company stocks returned 12.77% for the six months ended April 2012. The MSCI EAFE Index1 of developed foreign markets returned 2.71% for the period as a whole, while the MSCI EM Index1 returned 4.02%.
Among fixed-income securities, yields on U.S. Treasury bonds increased during the period, sending prices lower. Investment grade corporate bonds showed strength, as investors sought additional yield in a low interest rate environment. High-yield bonds performed especially well as their yield spread over U.S. Treasuries declined during the period. Fixed-income markets in emerging economies performed well, as investors became more confident in the credit worthiness of emerging nations and were attracted to the additional yield of such securities. The Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, which tracks the broad investment-grade fixed-income market, returned 2.44% for the six months ended April 30, 2012, while the Barclays Capital U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index1 returned 6.91%.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 7
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
Aggressive Strategy Fund
(Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares)
by Randeep Brar, CFA, Senior Vice President/Portfolio Manager
Caroline Hitch, Senior Portfolio Manager
The Aggressive Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) is a “fund of funds” which seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in underlying funds. The underlying funds may include mutual funds managed by HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”), mutual funds managed by investment advisers that are not associated with the Adviser and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) (collectively, “Underlying Funds”). The Fund may also purchase or hold exchange traded notes (“ETNs”).
Investment Concerns
Allocation Risk: The risk that the Adviser’s target asset and sector allocations and changes in target asset and sector allocations cause the Fund to underperform other similar funds or cause you to lose money, and that the Fund may not achieve its target asset and sector allocations.
Underlying Fund Selection Risk: The risk that the Fund may invest in Underlying Funds that underperform other similar funds or the markets more generally, due to poor investment decisions by the investment adviser(s) for the Underlying Funds or otherwise. Underlying Funds also have their own expenses, which the Fund bears in addition to its own expenses.
Equity Securities Risk: A portion of the assets of the Fund is allocated to Underlying Funds investing primarily in equity securities. Therefore, the value of the Fund may increase or decrease as a result of its indirect interest in equity securities.
Fixed Income Securities Risk: A portion of the assets of the Fund is allocated to Underlying Funds investing primarily in fixed income securities. Therefore, the value of the Fund may increase or decrease as a result of its indirect interest in fixed income securities.
Foreign Securities/Emerging Markets Risk: Foreign securities, including those of emerging market issuers, are subject to additional risks including international trade, currency, political, and regulatory risks. Securities of emerging market issuers generally have more risk than securities issued by issuers in more developed foreign markets.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Market Commentary
The Fund returned 7.80% (without sales charge) for the Class A Shares for the six-month period ended April 30, 2012. That compared to the 12.77%, 2.71%, 2.44%, 6.45% and 0.02% total returns for the Fund’s benchmarks the S&P 500 Index1, MSCI EAFE Index1, Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index1 and the Citigroup U.S. Domestic 3-Month Treasury Bill Index1, respectively. The Fund’s primary performance benchmark is the S&P 500 Index.
Portfolio Performance
The World Selection Funds aim to provide superior risk adjusted returns relative to a single asset class investment over the long term. The Funds’ broadly diversified investment approach across various asset classes and investment styles aims to contribute to achieving this objective. Each World Selection Fund has a strategic asset allocation, which represents a carefully constructed blend of asset classes, regions, and currencies to meet the longer-term investment goals.
All major equity markets posted overall positive returns during the six-month period ended April 2012. After a volatile fourth quarter in 2011, investors were compensated with strong returns in riskier asset classes during January and February 2012. These returns were driven mainly by better-than-expected economic data from developed markets and efforts by eurozone governments and the European Central Bank to address the European debt crisis. Against this backdrop, investor sentiment improved and equity market volatility returned to levels more in line with the period before the global financial crisis.
The Fund performed well in that environment, and benefited in particular from its strategic allocation to riskier asset classes such as equities and global high-yield bonds during the period. Within the Fund’s equity portfolio, we favored emerging market equities over their developed market equivalents. We believed such equities offered attractive valuations and a more robust macroeconomic picture.*
Within the Fund’s fixed-income segment, we favored corporate bonds, and in particular global high-yield bonds. We believed such investments offered better total return potential than other options in the fixed-income market.*
During the period the Fund benefited from its exposure to alternative asset classes such as commodities and private equity.*
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
8 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
Aggressive Strategy Fund
| | | | | | | | Average Annual | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Ratio (%)4 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | Since | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Inception | | Gross | | Net |
Aggressive Strategy Fund Class A1 | | 2/14/05 | | | 2.41 | | | -10.47 | | -1.08 | | | 3.95 | | | | 2.19 | | 1.88 |
Aggressive Strategy Fund Class B2 | | 2/9/05 | | | 3.30 | | | -10.23 | | -0.81 | | | 4.07 | | | | 2.94 | | 2.63 |
Aggressive Strategy Fund Class C3 | | 6/9/05 | | | 6.27 | | | -7.48 | | -0.80 | | | 4.11 | | | | 2.94 | | 2.63 |
S&P 500 Index5 | | — | | | 12.77 | | | 4.76 | | 1.01 | | | 4.37 | 6 | | | N/A | | N/A |
MSCI EAFE Index5 | | — | | | 2.71 | | | -12.38 | | -4.25 | | | 3.56 | 6 | | | N/A | | N/A |
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index5 | | — | | | 2.44 | | | 7.54 | | 6.37 | | | 5.43 | 6 | | | N/A | | N/A |
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index5 | | — | | | 6.45 | | | 5.15 | | 7.77 | | | 7.81 | 6 | | | N/A | | N/A |
Citigroup U.S. Domestic 3-Month Treasury Bill Index5 | | — | | | 0.02 | | | 0.04 | | 1.03 | | | 1.99 | 6 | | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect the taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower. Currently, contractual fee waivers are in effect for the Fund through March 1, 2013.
Certain returns shown include monies received by series of HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (the “Portfolios”), in which the Fund invests, in respect of one-time class action settlements. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Portfolios not received the payments.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | Reflects the maximum sales charge of 5.00%. |
2 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 4.00%. |
3 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 1.00%. |
4 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. The Adviser has entered into a contractual expense limitation agreement with the Fund under which it will limit total expenses of the Fund (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, extraordinary expenses and estimated indirect expenses attributable to the Fund’s investments in investment companies other than the HSBC Growth Portfolio and the HSBC Opportunity Portfolio) to an annual rate of 1.50%, 2.25%, and 2.25% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. The expense limitation shall be in effect until March 1, 2013. The expense ratios reflected include Acquired Fund fees and expenses. Additional information pertaining to the April 30, 2012 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights. |
5 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
6 | Return for the period February 9, 2005 to April 30, 2012. |
The Fund’s performance is primarily measured against the S&P 500 Index, an unmanaged index that is widely regarded as a gauge of the U.S. equities market. This index includes 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. Although the S&P 500 Index focuses on the large-cap segment of the market, with approximately 75% coverage of U.S. equities, it is also an ideal proxy for the total market. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 9
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
Balanced Strategy Fund (Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares) by Randeep Brar, CFA, Senior Vice President/Portfolio Manager Caroline Hitch, Senior Portfolio Manager |
The Balanced Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) is a “fund of funds” which seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in underlying funds. The underlying funds may include mutual funds managed by HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”), mutual funds managed by investment advisers that are not associated with the Adviser and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) (collectively, “Underlying Funds”). The Fund may also purchase or hold exchange traded notes (“ETNs”).
Investment Concerns
Allocation Risk: The risk that the Adviser’s target asset and sector allocations and changes in target asset and sector allocations cause the Fund to underperform other similar funds or cause you to lose money, and that the Fund may not achieve its target asset and sector allocations.
Underlying Fund Selection Risk: The risk that the Fund may invest in Underlying Funds that underperform other similar funds or the markets more generally, due to poor investment decisions by the investment adviser(s) for the Underlying Funds or otherwise. Underlying Funds also have their own expenses, which the Fund bears in addition to its own expenses.
Equity Securities Risk: A portion of the assets of the Fund is allocated to Underlying Funds investing primarily in equity securities. Therefore, the value of the Fund may increase or decrease as a result of its indirect interest in equity securities.
Fixed Income Securities Risk: A portion of the assets of the Fund is allocated to Underlying Funds investing primarily in fixed income securities. Therefore, the value of the Fund may increase or decrease as a result of its indirect interest in fixed income securities.
Foreign Securities/Emerging Markets Risk: Foreign securities, including those of emerging market issuers, are subject to additional risks including international trade, currency, political, and regulatory risks. Securities of emerging market issuers generally have more risk than securities issued by issuers in more developed foreign markets.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Market Commentary
The Fund returned 6.71% (without sales charge) for the Class A Shares for the six-month period ended April 30, 2012. That compared to the 12.77%, 2.71%, 2.44%, 6.45% and 0.02% total returns for the Fund’s benchmarks the S&P 500 Index1, MSCI EAFE Index1, Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index1 and the Citigroup U.S. Domestic 3-Month Treasury Bill Index1, respectively. The Fund’s primary performance benchmark is the S&P 500 Index.
Portfolio Performance
The World Selection Funds aim to provide superior risk adjusted returns relative to a single asset class investment over the long term. The Funds’ broadly diversified investment approach across various asset classes and investment styles aims to contribute to achieving this objective. Each World Selection Fund has a strategic asset allocation, which represents a carefully constructed blend of asset classes, regions, and currencies to meet the longer-term investment goals.
All major equity markets posted overall positive returns during the six-month period ended April 2012. After a volatile fourth quarter in 2011, investors were compensated with strong returns in riskier asset classes during January and February 2012. These returns were driven mainly by better-than-expected economic data from developed markets and efforts by eurozone governments and the European Central Bank to address the European debt crisis. Against this backdrop, investor sentiment improved and equity market volatility returned to levels more in line with the period before the global financial crisis.
The Fund performed well in that environment, and benefited in particular from its strategic allocation to riskier asset classes such as equities and global high-yield bonds during the period. Within the Fund’s equity portfolio, we favored emerging market equities over their developed market equivalents. We believed such equities offered attractive valuations and a more robust macroeconomic picture.*
Within the Fund’s fixed-income segment, we favored corporate bonds, and in particular global high-yield bonds. We believed such investments offered better total return potential than other options in the fixed-income market.*
During the period the Fund benefited from its exposure to alternative asset classes such as commodities and private equity.*
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
10 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | Average Annual | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Ratio (%)4 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | Since | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Inception | | Gross | | Net |
Balanced Strategy Fund Class A1 | | 2/8/05 | | | 1.33 | | | | -7.87 | | | | 0.15 | | | | 4.51 | | | 1.79 | | 1.79 |
Balanced Strategy Fund Class B2 | | 2/1/05 | | | 2.30 | | | | -7.48 | | | | 0.44 | | | | 4.75 | | | 2.54 | | 2.54 |
Balanced Strategy Fund Class C3 | | 4/27/05 | | | 5.40 | | | | -4.62 | | | | 0.45 | | | | 4.85 | | | 2.54 | | 2.54 |
S&P 500 Index5 | | — | | | 12.77 | | | | 4.76 | | | | 1.01 | | | | 4.40 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
MSCI EAFE Index5 | | — | | | 2.71 | | | | -12.38 | | | | -4.25 | | | | 3.54 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index5 | | — | | | 2.44 | | | | 7.54 | | | | 6.37 | | | | 5.52 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index5 | | — | | | 6.45 | | | | 5.15 | | | | 7.77 | | | | 7.92 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
Citigroup U.S. Domestic 3-Month Treasury Bill Index5 | | — | | | 0.02 | | | | 0.04 | | | | 1.03 | | | | 1.98 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect the taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower.
Certain returns shown include monies received by series of HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (the “Portfolios”), in which the Fund invests, in respect of one-time class action settlements. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Portfolios not received the payments.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | Reflects the maximum sales charge of 5.00%. |
2 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 4.00%. |
3 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 1.00%. |
4 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. The expense ratios reflected include Acquired Fund fees and expenses. Additional information pertaining to the April 30, 2012 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights. |
5 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
6 | Return for the period February 1, 2005 to April 30, 2012. |
The Fund’s performance is primarily measured against the S&P 500 Index, an unmanaged index that is widely regarded as a gauge of the U.S. equities market. This index includes 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. Although the S&P 500 focuses on the large-cap segment of the market, with approximately 75% coverage of U.S. equities, it is also an ideal proxy for the total market. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 11
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
Moderate Strategy Fund (Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares) by Randeep Brar, CFA, Senior Vice President/Portfolio Manager Caroline Hitch, Senior Portfolio Manager |
The Moderate Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) is a “fund of funds” which seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in underlying funds. The underlying funds may include mutual funds managed by HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”), mutual funds managed by investment advisers that are not associated with the Adviser and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) (collectively, “Underlying Funds”). The Fund may also purchase or hold exchange traded notes (“ETNs”).
Investment Concerns
Allocation Risk: The risk that the Adviser’s target asset and sector allocations and changes in target asset and sector allocations cause the Fund to underperform other similar funds or cause you to lose money, and that the Fund may not achieve its target asset and sector allocations.
Underlying Fund Selection Risk: The risk that the Fund may invest in Underlying Funds that underperform other similar funds or the markets more generally, due to poor investment decisions by the investment adviser(s) for the Underlying Funds or otherwise. Underlying Funds also have their own expenses, which the Fund bears in addition to its own expenses.
Equity Securities Risk: A portion of the assets of the Fund is allocated to Underlying Funds investing primarily in equity securities. Therefore, the value of the Fund may increase or decrease as a result of its indirect interest in equity securities.
Fixed Income Securities Risk: A portion of the assets of the Fund is allocated to Underlying Funds investing primarily in fixed income securities. Therefore, the value of the Fund may increase or decrease as a result of its indirect interest in fixed income securities.
Foreign Securities/Emerging Markets Risk: Foreign securities, including those of emerging market issuers, are subject to additional risks including international trade, currency, political, and regulatory risks. Securities of emerging market issuers generally have more risk than securities issued by issuers in more developed foreign markets.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Market Commentary
The Fund returned 5.81% (without sales charge) for the Class A Shares for the six-month period ended April 30, 2012. That compared to the 12.77%, 2.71%, 2.44%, 6.45% and 0.02% total returns for the Fund’s benchmarks the S&P 500 Index1, MSCI EAFE Index1, Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index1 and the Citigroup U.S. Domestic 3-Month Treasury Bill Index1, respectively. The Fund’s primary performance benchmark is the S&P 500 Index.
Portfolio Performance
The World Selection Funds aim to provide superior risk adjusted returns relative to a single asset class investment over the long term. The Funds’ broadly diversified investment approach across various asset classes and investment styles aims to contribute to achieving this objective. Each World Selection Fund has a strategic asset allocation, which represents a carefully constructed blend of asset classes, regions, and currencies to meet the longer-term investment goals.
All major equity markets posted overall positive returns during the six-month period ended April 2012. After a volatile fourth quarter in 2011, investors were compensated with strong returns in riskier asset classes during January and February 2012. These returns were driven mainly by better-than-expected economic data from developed markets and efforts by eurozone governments and the European Central Bank to address the European debt crisis. Against this backdrop, investor sentiment improved and equity market volatility returned to levels more in line with the period before the global financial crisis.
The Fund performed well in that environment, and benefited in particular from its strategic allocation to riskier asset classes such as equities and global high-yield bonds during the period. Within the Fund’s equity portfolio, we favored emerging market equities over their developed market equivalents. We believed such equities offered attractive valuations and a more robust macroeconomic picture.*
Within the Fund’s fixed-income segment, we favored corporate bonds, and in particular global high-yield bonds. We believed such investments offered better total return potential than other options in the fixed-income market.*
During the period the Fund benefited from its exposure to alternative asset classes such as commodities and private equity.*
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
12 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | Average Annual | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Ratio (%)4 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | Since | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Inception | | Gross | | Net |
Moderate Strategy Fund Class A1 | | 2/3/05 | | | 0.56 | | | | -6.15 | | | | 0.97 | | | | 4.22 | | | 1.80 | | 1.80 |
Moderate Strategy Fund Class B2 | | 2/1/05 | | | 1.34 | | | | -5.83 | | | | 1.25 | | | | 4.40 | | | 2.55 | | 2.55 |
Moderate Strategy Fund Class C3 | | 6/9/05 | | | 4.40 | | | | -2.92 | | | | 1.25 | | | | 4.16 | | | 2.55 | | 2.55 |
S&P 500 Index5 | | — | | | 12.77 | | | | 4.76 | | | | 1.01 | | | | 4.40 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
MSCI EAFE Index5 | | — | | | 2.71 | | | | -12.38 | | | | -4.25 | | | | 3.54 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index5 | | — | | | 2.44 | | | | 7.54 | | | | 6.37 | | | | 5.52 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index5 | | — | | | 6.45 | | | | 5.15 | | | | 7.77 | | | | 7.92 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
Citigroup U.S. Domestic 3-Month Treasury Bill Index5 | | — | | | 0.02 | | | | 0.04 | | | | 1.03 | | | | 1.98 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect the taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower.
Certain returns shown include monies received by series of HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (the “Portfolios”), in which the Fund invests, in respect of one-time class action settlements. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Portfolios not received the payments.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | Reflects the maximum sales charge of 5.00%. |
2 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 4.00%. |
3 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 1.00%. |
4 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. The expense ratios reflected include Acquired Fund fees and expenses. Additional information pertaining to the April 30, 2012 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights. |
5 | For additional information, please refer to Glossary of Terms. |
6 | Return for the period February 1, 2005 to April 30, 2012. |
The Fund’s performance is primarily measured against the S&P 500 Index, an unmanaged index that is widely regarded as a gauge of the U.S. equities market. This index includes 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. Although the S&P 500 focuses on the large-cap segment of the market, with approximately 75% coverage of U.S. equities, it is also an ideal proxy for the total market. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
Conservative Strategy Fund (Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares) by Randeep Brar, CFA, Senior Vice President/Portfolio Manager Caroline Hitch, Senior Portfolio Manager |
The Conservative Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) is a “fund of funds” which seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in underlying funds. The underlying funds may include mutual funds managed by HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”), mutual funds managed by investment advisers that are not associated with the Adviser and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) (collectively, “Underlying Funds”). The Fund may also purchase or hold exchange traded notes (“ETNs”).
Investment Concerns
Allocation Risk: The risk that the Adviser’s target asset and sector allocations and changes in target asset and sector allocations cause the Fund to underperform other similar funds or cause you to lose money, and that the Fund may not achieve its target asset and sector allocations.
Underlying Fund Selection Risk: The risk that the Fund may invest in Underlying Funds that underperform other similar funds or the markets more generally, due to poor investment decisions by the investment adviser(s) for the Underlying Funds or otherwise. Underlying Funds also have their own expenses, which the Fund bears in addition to its own expenses.
Equity Securities Risk: A portion of the assets of the Fund is allocated to Underlying Funds investing primarily in equity securities. Therefore, the value of the Fund may increase or decrease as a result of its indirect interest in equity securities.
Fixed Income Securities Risk: A portion of the assets of the Fund is allocated to Underlying Funds investing primarily in fixed income securities. Therefore, the value of the Fund may increase or decrease as a result of its indirect interest in fixed income securities.
Foreign Securities/Emerging Markets Risk: Foreign securities, including those of emerging market issuers, are subject to additional risks including international trade, currency, political, and regulatory risks. Securities of emerging market issuers generally have more risk than securities issued by issuers in more developed foreign markets.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Market Commentary
The Fund returned 4.89% (without sales charge) for the Class A Shares for the six-month period ended April 30, 2012. That compared to the 12.77%, 2.71%, 2.44%, 6.45% and 0.02% total returns for the Fund’s benchmarks the S&P 500 Index1, MSCI EAFE Index1, Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index1 and the Citigroup U.S. Domestic 3-Month Treasury Bill Index1, respectively. The Fund’s primary performance benchmark is the S&P 500 Index.
Portfolio Performance
The World Selection Funds aim to provide superior risk adjusted returns relative to a single asset class investment over the long term. The Funds’ broadly diversified investment approach across various asset classes and investment styles aims to contribute to achieving this objective. Each World Selection Fund has a strategic asset allocation, which represents a carefully constructed blend of asset classes, regions, and currencies to meet the longer-term investment goals.
All major equity markets posted overall positive returns during the six-month period ended April 2012. After a volatile fourth quarter in 2011, investors were compensated with strong returns in riskier asset classes during January and February 2012. These returns were driven mainly by better-than-expected economic data from developed markets and efforts by eurozone governments and the European Central Bank to address the European debt crisis. Against this backdrop, investor sentiment improved and equity market volatility returned to levels more in line with the period before the global financial crisis.
The Fund performed well in that environment, and benefited in particular from its strategic allocation to riskier asset classes such as equities and global high-yield bonds during the period. Within the Fund’s equity portfolio, we favored emerging market equities over their developed market equivalents. We believed such equities offered attractive valuations and a more robust macroeconomic picture.
Within the Fund’s fixed-income segment, we favored corporate bonds, and in particular global high-yield bonds. We believed such investments offered better total return potential than other options in the fixed-income market.*
During the period the Fund benefited from its exposure to alternative asset classes such as commodities and private equity.*
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
14 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
Conservative Strategy Fund |
| | | | | | | | Average Annual | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Ratio (%)4 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | Since | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Inception | | Gross | | Net |
Conservative Strategy Fund Class A1 | | 2/23/05 | | | -0.39 | | | | -4.00 | | | | 1.57 | | | | 3.81 | | | 1.95 | | 1.95 |
Conservative Strategy Fund Class B2 | | 2/17/05 | | | 0.48 | | | | -3.64 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 3.85 | | | 2.70 | | 2.70 |
Conservative Strategy Fund Class C3 | | 4/19/05 | | | 3.51 | | | | -0.75 | | | | 1.95 | | | | 4.18 | | | 2.70 | | 2.70 |
S&P 500 Index5 | | — | | | 12.77 | | | | 4.76 | | | | 1.01 | | | | 4.27 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
MSCI EAFE Index5 | | — | | | 2.71 | | | | -12.38 | | | | -4.25 | | | | 3.21 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index5 | | — | | | 2.44 | | | | 7.54 | | | | 6.37 | | | | 5.55 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index5 | | — | | | 6.45 | | | | 5.15 | | | | 7.77 | | | | 7.80 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
Citigroup U.S. Domestic 3-Month Treasury Bill Index5 | | — | | | 0.02 | | | | 0.04 | | | | 1.03 | | | | 2.00 | 6 | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect the taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower.
Certain returns shown include monies received by the Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, in respect of one-time class action settlements. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Portfolios not received the payments.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | Reflects the maximum sales charge of 5.00%. |
2 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 4.00%. |
3 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 1.00%. |
4 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. The expense ratios reflected include Acquired Fund fees and expenses. Additional information pertaining to the April 30, 2012 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights. |
5 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
6 | Return for the period February 17, 2005 to April 30, 2012. |
The Fund’s performance is primarily measured against the S&P 500 Index, an unmanaged index that is widely regarded as a gauge of the U.S. equities market. This index includes 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. Although the S&P 500 focuses on the large-cap segment of the market, with approximately 75% coverage of U.S. equities, it is also an ideal proxy for the total market. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 15
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Income Strategy Fund (Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares) Randeep Brar, CFA, Senior Vice President/Portfolio Manager Caroline Hitch, Senior Portfolio Manager |
The Income Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) is a “fund of funds” which primarily seeks current income and secondarily seeks to provide long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in underlying funds. The underlying funds may include mutual funds managed by HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”), mutual funds managed by investment advisers that are not associated with the Adviser and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) (collectively, “Underlying Funds”). The Fund may also purchase or hold exchange traded notes (“ETNs”).
Investment Concerns
Allocation Risk: The risk that the Adviser’s target asset and sector allocations and changes in target asset and sector allocations cause the Fund to underperform other similar funds or cause you to lose money, and that the Fund may not achieve its target asset and sector allocations.
Underlying Fund Selection Risk: The risk that the Fund may invest in Underlying Funds that underperform other similar funds or the markets more generally, due to poor investment decisions by the investment adviser(s) for the Underlying Funds or otherwise. Underlying Funds also have their own expenses, which the Fund bears in addition to its own expenses.
Equity Securities Risk: A portion of the assets of the Fund is allocated to Underlying Funds investing primarily in equity securities. Therefore, the value of the Fund may increase or decrease as a result of its indirect interest in equity securities.
Fixed Income Securities Risk: A portion of the assets of the Fund is allocated to Underlying Funds investing primarily in fixed income securities. Therefore, the value of the Fund may increase or decrease as a result of its indirect interest in fixed income securities.
Foreign Securities/Emerging Markets Risk: Foreign securities, including those of emerging market issuers, are subject to additional risks including international trade, currency, political, and regulatory risks. Securities of emerging market issuers generally have more risk than securities issued by issuers in more developed foreign markets.
The net asset value per share of this Fund will fluctuate as the value of the securities in the portfolio changes.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Portfolio Composition*–as of April 30, 2012
HSBC World Selection Funds (Unaudited)
Aggressive Strategy Fund | | | | |
| | Percentage of |
Investment Allocation | | Investments at Value(%) |
Domestic Equities | | | 58.6 | |
International Equities | | | 25.3 | |
Fixed Income | | | 10.6 | |
Alternatives | | | 5.3 | |
Cash | | | 0.2 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
| |
Balanced Strategy Fund | | | | |
| | Percentage of |
Investment Allocation | | Investments at Value(%) |
Domestic Equities | | | 42.4 | |
International Equities | | | 24.3 | |
Fixed income | | | 22.2 | |
Alternatives | | | 10.7 | |
Cash | | | 0.4 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
| |
Moderate Strategy Fund | | | | |
| | Percentage of |
Investment Allocation | | Investments at Value(%) |
Fixed Income | | | 36.2 | |
Domestic Equities | | | 28.5 | |
International Equities | | | 22.6 | |
Alternatives | | | 11.1 | |
Cash | | | 1.6 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
| | | | |
Conservative Strategy Fund | | | | |
| | Percentage of |
Investment Allocation | | Investments at Value(%) |
Fixed Income | | | 54.1 | |
Domestic Equities | | | 17.6 | |
International Equities | | | 16.4 | |
Alternatives | | | 10.2 | |
Cash | | | 1.7 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
| |
Income Strategy Fund | | | | |
| | Percentage of |
Investment Allocation | | Investments at Value(%) |
Fixed Income | | | 72.7 | |
International Equities | | | 15.2 | |
Domestic Equities | | | 9.5 | |
Alternatives | | | 1.5 | |
Cash | | | 1.1 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
| | | | |
HSBC Portfolios | | | | |
| |
HSBC Growth Portfolio | | | | |
| | Percentage of |
Investment Allocation | | Investments at Value(%) |
Computers & Peripherals | | | 9.7 | |
Software | | | 7.3 | |
Internet Software & Services | | | 7.0 | |
IT Services | | | 6.5 | |
Machinery | | | 5.5 | |
Internet & Catalog Retail | | | 4.9 | |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | | | 4.7 | |
Health Care Providers & Services | | | 4.6 | |
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | | | 4.0 | |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | | | 3.5 | |
Communications Equipment | | | 3.4 | |
Road & Rail | | | 3.4 | |
Chemicals | | | 3.3 | |
Capital Markets | | | 3.3 | |
Aerospace & Defense | | | 2.8 | |
Diversified Financial Services | | | 2.8 | |
Biotechnology | | | 2.7 | |
Investment Companies | | | 2.6 | |
Energy Equipment & Services | | | 2.6 | |
Food & Staples Retailing | | | 2.4 | |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies | | | 2.3 | |
Pharmaceuticals | | | 1.8 | |
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) | | | 1.7 | |
Specialty Retail | | | 1.5 | |
Construction & Engineering | | | 1.3 | |
Auto Components | | | 1.2 | |
Personal Products | | | 0.8 | |
Health Care Technology | | | 0.7 | |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | | | 0.7 | |
Media | | | 0.5 | |
Metals & Mining | | | 0.4 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
| | | | |
HSBC Opportunity Portfolio | | | | |
| | Percentage of |
Investment Allocation | | Investments at Value(%) |
Specialty Retail | | | 11.4 | |
Machinery | | | 7.4 | |
Road & Rail | | | 5.6 | |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | | | 5.4 | |
IT Services | | | 5.2 | |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies | | | 4.6 | |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | | | 4.6 | |
Aerospace & Defense | | | 4.3 | |
Investment Companies | | | 4.0 | |
Containers & Packaging | | | 3.7 | |
Trading Companies & Distributors | | | 3.7 | |
Software | | | 3.5 | |
Chemicals | | | 3.5 | |
Commercial Banks | | | 3.1 | |
Energy Equipment & Services | | | 3.1 | |
Capital Markets | | | 2.9 | |
Electrical Equipment | | | 2.7 | |
Food Products | | | 2.7 | |
Pharmaceuticals | | | 2.3 | |
Health Care Providers & Services | | | 2.2 | |
Life Sciences Tools & Services | | | 2.0 | |
Professional Services | | | 2.0 | |
Insurance | | | 2.0 | |
Commercial Services & Supplies | | | 1.8 | |
Real Estate Management & Development | | | 1.7 | |
Communications Equipment | | | 1.6 | |
Diversified Financial Services | | | 1.2 | |
Personal Products | | | 1.2 | |
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | | | 0.4 | |
Wireless Telecommunication Services | | | 0.3 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
____________________
* | Portfolio composition is subject to change. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 17 |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Affiliated Investment Company—0.1% | | | | |
| | Shares | | Value($) |
HSBC Prime Money Market | | | | |
Fund, Class I Shares, 0.17%(a) | | 27,119 | | 27,119 |
TOTAL AFFILIATED | | | | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | | | | |
(COST $27,119) | | | | 27,119 |
|
Affiliated Portfolios—18.9% | | | | |
HSBC Growth Portfolio | | | | 2,742,277 |
HSBC Opportunity Portfolio | | | | 758,343 |
TOTAL AFFILIATED | | | | |
PORTFOLIOS | | | | 3,500,620 |
|
Unaffiliated Investment Companies—56.2% | | |
Artisan Value Fund, Class IV Shares | | 110,543 | | 1,223,710 |
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 20,514 | | 305,447 |
Columbia High Yield Bond Fund, | | | | |
Class Z Shares | | 297,340 | | 844,445 |
CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 50,870 | | 758,469 |
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 72,132 | | 986,050 |
Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 5,588 | | 43,308 |
EII Global Property Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 4,143 | | 64,552 |
Janus Flexible Bond Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 3,873 | | 41,717 |
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 178,218 | | 1,821,392 |
JPMorgan High Yield Fund, | | | | |
Select Shares | | 106,425 | | 842,888 |
Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 5,219 | | 58,291 |
Lord Abbett International Core Equity Trust, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 171,051 | | 1,975,639 |
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 3,925 | | 41,647 |
Northern Institutional Diversified Assets | | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01%(a) | | 9,270 | | 9,270 |
PIMCO Commodity RealReturn | | | | |
Strategy Fund, Institutional Shares | | 10,482 | | 70,545 |
PIMCO Total Return Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 6,934 | | 77,798 |
T. Rowe Price New Income Fund, | | | | |
Retail Shares | | 5,960 | | 58,234 |
Trilogy Emerging Markets Equity Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 137,969 | | 1,219,643 |
TOTAL UNAFFILIATED | | | | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | | | | |
(COST $10,148,942) | | | | 10,443,045 |
| | | | |
Exchange Traded Funds—24.8% | | | | |
iShares MSCI Emeging Markets | | | | |
Index Fund | | 11,369 | | 479,772 |
PowerShares Global Listed Private | | | | |
Equity Portfolio ETF | | 92,687 | | 858,282 |
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | | 23,348 | | 3,263,350 |
TOTAL EXCHANGE TRADED | | | | |
FUND (COST $4,559,187) | | | | 4,601,404 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT | | | | |
SECURITIES—100.0% | | | | 18,572,188 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $18,572,627. |
(a) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
| | | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | | |
SPDR | Standard & Poor’s Depositary Receipt | | |
18 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Affiliated Investment Companies—8.1% |
| | Shares | | Value($) |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 397,488 | | 4,265,046 |
HSBC Prime Money Market Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares, 0.17%(a) | | 141,894 | | 141,894 |
TOTAL AFFILIATED | | | | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | | | | |
(COST $4,257,664) | | | | 4,406,940 |
|
Affiliated Portfolios—13.8% | | | | |
HSBC Growth Portfolio | | | | 5,901,071 |
HSBC Opportunity Portfolio | | | | 1,635,937 |
TOTAL AFFILIATED | | | | |
PORTFOLIOS | | | | 7,537,008 |
|
Unaffiliated Investment Companies—57.1% | | |
Artisan Value Fund, Class IV Shares | | 235,561 | | 2,607,656 |
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 44,000 | | 655,157 |
Columbia High Yield Bond Fund, | | | | |
Class Z Shares | | 1,265,554 | | 3,594,174 |
CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 108,794 | | 1,622,115 |
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 111,018 | | 1,517,614 |
Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 52,387 | | 406,002 |
EII Global Property Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 37,959 | | 591,407 |
Janus Flexible Bond Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 53,451 | | 575,672 |
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 380,895 | | 3,892,751 |
JPMorgan High Yield Fund, | | | | |
Select Shares | | 453,066 | | 3,588,284 |
Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 72,011 | | 804,365 |
Lord Abbett International Core Equity Trust, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 315,074 | | 3,639,108 |
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 54,158 | | 574,615 |
Northern Institutional Diversified Assets | | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01%(a) | | 59,877 | | 59,878 |
PIMCO Commodity RealReturn Strategy | | | | |
Fund, Institutional Shares | | 508,012 | | 3,418,919 |
PIMCO Total Return Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 95,667 | | 1,073,379 |
T. Rowe Price New Income Fund, | | | | |
Retail Shares | | 82,240 | | 803,487 |
Trilogy Emerging Markets Equity Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 206,543 | | 1,825,836 |
TOTAL UNAFFILIATED | | | | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | | | | |
(COST $31,284,138) | | | | 31,250,419 |
| | | | |
Exchange Traded Funds—21.2% | | | | |
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade | | | | |
Corporate Bond Fund | | 9,631 | | 1,121,819 |
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets | | | | |
Index Fund | | 39,022 | | 1,646,728 |
PowerShares Global Listed Private | | | | |
Equity Portfolio ETF | | 197,878 | | 1,832,350 |
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | | 49,997 | | 6,988,081 |
TOTAL EXCHANGE TRADED | | | | |
FUND (COST $11,420,662) | | | | 11,588,978 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT | | | | |
SECURITIES—100.2% | | | | 54,783,345 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $54,684,554.
(a) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
ETF | | Exchange Traded Fund |
SPDR | | Standard & Poor’s Depositary Receipt |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 19 |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Affiliated Investment Companies—10.5% | | |
| | Shares | | Value($) |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 397,325 | | 4,263,300 |
HSBC Prime Money Market Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares, 0.17%(a) | | 767,369 | | 767,369 |
TOTAL AFFILIATED | | | | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | | | | |
(COST $4,843,500) | | | | 5,030,669 |
|
Affiliated Portfolios—9.1% | | | | |
HSBC Growth Portfolio | | | | 3,423,757 |
HSBC Opportunity Portfolio | | | | 949,066 |
TOTAL AFFILIATED | | | | |
PORTFOLIOS | | | | 4,372,823 |
|
Unaffiliated Investment Companies—66.1% | | |
Artisan Value Fund, Class IV Shares | | 140,168 | | 1,551,658 |
ASG Global Alternatives Fund, | | | | |
Class Y Shares | | 33,334 | | 354,677 |
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 25,991 | | 387,012 |
Columbia High Yield Bond Fund, | | | | |
Class Z Shares | | 1,095,890 | | 3,112,328 |
CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 65,336 | | 974,163 |
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 69,049 | | 943,902 |
Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 43,355 | | 336,001 |
EII Global Property Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 29,983 | | 467,135 |
Janus Flexible Bond Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 145,218 | | 1,563,994 |
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 232,644 | | 2,377,617 |
JPMorgan High Yield Fund, | | | | |
Select Shares | | 392,344 | | 3,107,362 |
Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 195,639 | | 2,185,289 |
Lord Abbett International Core Equity Trust, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 273,582 | | 3,159,872 |
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 147,134 | | 1,561,093 |
PIMCO Commodity RealReturn Strategy | | | | |
Fund, Institutional Shares | | 519,428 | | 3,495,751 |
PIMCO Total Return Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 259,902 | | 2,916,096 |
T. Rowe Price New Income Fund, | | | | |
Retail Shares | | 223,426 | | 2,182,877 |
Trilogy Emerging Markets Equity Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 130,355 | | 1,152,339 |
TOTAL UNAFFILIATED | | | | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | | | | |
(COST $31,947,266) | | | | 31,829,166 |
| | | | |
Exchange Traded Funds—14.5% | | | | |
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade | | | | |
Corporate Bond Fund | | 6,978 | | 812,797 |
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets | | | | |
Index Fund | | 24,471 | | 1,032,676 |
PowerShares Global Listed Private | | | | |
Equity Portfolio ETF | | 112,402 | | 1,040,843 |
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | | 29,275 | | 4,091,767 |
TOTAL EXCHANGE TRADED | | | | |
FUND (COST $6,842,785) | | | | 6,978,083 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT | | | | |
SECURITIES—100.2% | | | | 48,210,741 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $48,128,988.
(a) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
ETF | | Exchange Traded Fund |
SPDR | | Standard & Poor’s Depositary Receipt |
20 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
CONSERVATIVE STRATEGY FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Affiliated Investment Companies—10.4% | | |
| | Shares | | Value($) |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 185,980 | | 1,995,570 |
HSBC Prime Money Market Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares, 0.17%(a) | | 363,054 | | 363,054 |
TOTAL AFFILIATED | | | | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | | | | |
(COST $2,273,319) | | | | 2,358,624 |
|
Affiliated Portfolios—5.6% | | | | |
HSBC Growth Portfolio | | | | 978,943 |
HSBC Opportunity Portfolio | | | | 272,621 |
TOTAL AFFILIATED | | | | |
PORTFOLIOS | | | | 1,251,564 |
|
Unaffiliated Investment Companies—75.8% | | |
Artisan Value Fund, Class IV Shares | | 39,999 | | 442,791 |
ASG Global Alternatives Fund, | | | | |
Class Y Shares | | 58,822 | | 625,869 |
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 7,316 | | 108,939 |
Columbia High Yield Bond Fund, | | | | |
Class Z Shares | | 483,134 | | 1,372,103 |
CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 18,478 | | 275,500 |
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 7,991 | | 109,238 |
Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 4,675 | | 36,228 |
EII Global Property Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 3,724 | | 58,017 |
Janus Flexible Bond Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 126,750 | | 1,365,098 |
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 66,533 | | 679,969 |
JPMorgan High Yield Fund, | | | | |
Select Shares | | 180,664 | | 1,430,855 |
Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 171,428 | | 1,914,852 |
Lord Abbett International Core Equity Trust, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 105,670 | | 1,220,484 |
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 128,165 | | 1,359,831 |
Northern Institutional Diversified Assets | | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01%(a) | | 11,419 | | 11,420 |
PIMCO Commodity RealReturn Strategy | | | | |
Fund, Institutional Shares | | 226,635 | | 1,525,253 |
PIMCO Total Return Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 224,028 | | 2,513,600 |
T. Rowe Price New Income Fund, | | | | |
Retail Shares | | 194,908 | | 1,904,253 |
Trilogy Emerging Markets Equity Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 15,068 | | 133,199 |
TOTAL UNAFFILIATED | | | | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | | | | |
(COST $17,017,275) | | | | 17,087,499 |
| | | | |
Exchange Traded Funds—8.2% | | | | |
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade | | | | |
Corporate Bond Fund | | 2,887 | | 336,278 |
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets | | | | |
Index Fund | | 4,884 | | 206,105 |
PowerShares Global Listed Private | | | | |
Equity Portfolio ETF | | 9,070 | | 83,988 |
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | | 8,697 | | 1,215,579 |
TOTAL EXCHANGE TRADED | | | | |
FUND (COST $1,774,261) | | | | 1,841,950 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT | | | | |
SECURITIES—100.0% | | | | 22,539,637 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $22,544,696.
(a) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
ETF | | Exchange Traded Fund |
SPDR | | Standard & Poor’s Depositary Receipt |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 21 |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Affiliated Investment Companies—9.4% | | | | |
| | Shares | | Value($) |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 516 | | 5,541 |
HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 719 | | 7,020 |
HSBC Prime Money Market Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares, 0.17%(a) | | 1,413 | | 1,413 |
TOTAL AFFILIATED | | | | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | | | | |
(COST $13,886) | | | | 13,974 |
|
Unaffiliated Investment Companies—86.3% | | |
Columbia High Yield Bond Fund, | | | | |
Class Z Shares | | 2,418 | | 6,868 |
Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund, | | | | |
Class I Shares | | 183 | | 1,419 |
EII Global Property Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 135 | | 2,111 |
Federated Strategic Value Dividend Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 2,810 | | 13,798 |
Janus Flexible Bond Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 1,247 | | 13,433 |
JPMorgan High Yield Fund, | | | | |
Select Shares | | 866 | | 6,855 |
Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 1,684 | | 18,812 |
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 1,265 | | 13,417 |
Northern Institutional Diversified Assets | | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01%(a) | | 154 | | 154 |
PIMCO Total Return Fund, | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | 2,239 | | 25,116 |
T. Rowe Price International Growth & | | | | |
Income Fund | | 642 | | 8,071 |
T. Rowe Price New Income Fund, | | | | |
Retail Shares | | 1,920 | | 18,759 |
TOTAL UNAFFILIATED | | | | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | | | | |
(COST $127,888) | | | | 128,813 |
|
Exchange Traded Fund—1.4% | | | | |
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade | | | | |
Corporate Bond Fund | | 18 | | 2,096 |
TOTAL EXCHANGE TRADED | | | | |
FUND (COST $2,084) | | | | 2,096 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT | | | | |
SECURITIES—97.1% | | | | 144,883 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $149,200.
(a) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
22 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | Aggressive | | Balanced | | Moderate | | Conservative | | Income |
| | Strategy | | Strategy | | Strategy | | Strategy | | Strategy |
| | Fund | | Fund | | Fund | | Fund | | Fund |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Affiliated Portfolios | | | $ | 3,500,620 | | | | | $ | 7,537,008 | | | | | $ | 4,372,823 | | | | | $ | 1,251,564 | | | | | $ | — | | |
Investments in Affiliated Investment Companies, at value(a) | | | | 27,119 | | | | | | 4,406,940 | | | | | | 5,030,669 | | | | | | 2,358,624 | | | | | | 13,974 | | |
Investments in non-affiliates, at value | | | | 15,044,449 | | | | | | 42,839,397 | | | | | | 38,807,249 | | | | | | 18,929,449 | | | | | | 130,909 | | |
Total Investments | | | | 18,572,188 | | | | | | 54,783,345 | | | | | | 48,210,741 | | | | | | 22,539,637 | | | | | | 144,883 | | |
Cash | | | | 14,464 | | | | | | 30,650 | | | | | | 12,741 | | | | | | 5,287 | | | | | | — | | |
Income and dividends receivable | | | | 7 | | | | | | 143 | | | | | | 407 | | | | | | 368 | | | | | | 259 | | |
Receivable for capital shares issued | | | | 33,221 | | | | | | 62,573 | | | | | | 51,770 | | | | | | 29,208 | | | | | | — | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | | — | | | | | | 17,829 | | | | | | 5,928 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 750 | | |
Reclaims receivable | | | | 1,213 | | | | | | 2,352 | | | | | | 2,235 | | | | | | 668 | | | | | | — | | |
Receivable from Investment Adviser | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | 8,418 | | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | | 13,345 | | | | | | 12,919 | | | | | | 15,696 | | | | | | 10,268 | | | | | | — | | |
Total Assets | | | | 18,634,438 | | | | | | 54,909,811 | | | | | | 48,299,518 | | | | | | 22,585,436 | | | | | | 154,310 | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | | 9,032 | | | | | | 77,414 | | | | | | 105 | | | | | | 11,251 | | | | | | — | | |
Payable for capital shares redeemed | | | | 33,565 | | | | | | 83,106 | | | | | | 116,781 | | | | | | 3,000 | | | | | | — | | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | | 4,007 | | | | | | 11,142 | | | | | | 9,809 | | | | | | 4,532 | | | | | | 28 | | |
Administration | | | | 378 | | | | | | 1,108 | | | | | | 976 | | | | | | 451 | | | | | | 2 | | |
Distribution | | | | 5,241 | | | | | | 15,396 | | | | | | 14,444 | | | | | | 7,470 | | | | | | 8 | | |
Shareholder Servicing | | | | 3,797 | | | | | | 11,139 | | | | | | 9,815 | | | | | | 4,527 | | | | | | 28 | | |
Accounting | | | | 186 | | | | | | 199 | | | | | | 200 | | | | | | 198 | | | | | | 99 | | |
Custodian | | | | 25 | | | | | | 61 | | | | | | 115 | | | | | | 148 | | | | | | 1,207 | | |
Transfer Agent | | | | 3,610 | | | | | | 5,121 | | | | | | 2,086 | | | | | | 2,692 | | | | | | — | | |
Trustee | | | | 19 | | | | | | 58 | | | | | | 53 | | | | | | 29 | | | | | | 83 | | |
Other | | | | 1,951 | | | | | | 20,513 | | | | | | 16,146 | | | | | | 6,442 | | | | | | 3,655 | | |
Total Liabilities | | | | 61,811 | | | | | | 225,257 | | | | | | 170,530 | | | | | | 40,740 | | | | | | 5,110 | | |
Net Assets | | | $ | 18,572,627 | | | | | $ | 54,684,554 | | | | | $ | 48,128,988 | | | | | $ | 22,544,696 | | | | | $ | 149,200 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Composition of Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital | | | | 17,761,946 | | | | | | 52,883,924 | | | | | | 47,026,916 | | | | | | 22,025,071 | | | | | | 147,993 | | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | | | (68,200 | ) | | | | | (33,519 | ) | | | | | (96,977 | ) | | | | | (55,011 | ) | | | | | 102 | | |
Accumulated net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | | (416,785 | ) | | | | | (571,225 | ) | | | | | (381,239 | ) | | | | | (22,237 | ) | | | | | 79 | | |
Unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | | 1,295,666 | | | | | | 2,405,374 | | | | | | 1,580,288 | | | | | | 596,873 | | | | | | 1,026 | | |
Net Assets | | | $ | 18,572,627 | | | | | $ | 54,684,554 | | | | | $ | 48,128,988 | | | | | $ | 22,544,696 | | | | | $ | 149,200 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | $ | 10,057,099 | | | | | $ | 29,544,457 | | | | | $ | 24,551,126 | | | | | $ | 10,132,501 | | | | | $ | 134,284 | | |
Class B Shares | | | | 6,783,531 | | | | | | 18,725,009 | | | | | | 19,842,981 | | | | | | 9,743,975 | | | | | | 7,458 | | |
Class C Shares | | | | 1,731,997 | | | | | | 6,415,088 | | | | | | 3,734,881 | | | | | | 2,668,220 | | | | | | 7,458 | | |
| | | $ | 18,572,627 | | | | | $ | 54,684,554 | | | | | $ | 48,128,988 | | | | | $ | 22,544,696 | | | | | $ | 149,200 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($0.001 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | 787,026 | | | | | | 2,372,160 | | | | | | 2,099,124 | | | | | | 902,558 | | | | | | 13,265 | | |
Class B Shares | | | | 552,775 | | | | | | 1,504,714 | | | | | | 1,698,309 | | | | | | 878,429 | | | | | | 738 | | |
Class C Shares | | | | 141,687 | | | | | | 514,825 | | | | | | 328,511 | | | | | | 233,815 | | | | | | 738 | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | $ | 12.78 | | | | | $ | 12.45 | | | | | $ | 11.70 | | | | | $ | 11.23 | | | | | $ | 10.12 | | |
Class B Shares(b) | | | $ | 12.27 | | | | | $ | 12.44 | | | | | $ | 11.68 | | | | | $ | 11.09 | | | | | $ | 10.11 | | |
Class C Shares(b) | | | $ | 12.22 | | | | | $ | 12.46 | | | | | $ | 11.37 | | | | | $ | 11.41 | | | | | $ | 10.11 | | |
Maximum Sales Charge—Class A Shares | | | | 5.00 | % | | | | | 5.00 | % | | | | | 5.00 | % | | | | | 5.00 | % | | | | | 4.75 | % | |
Maximum Offering Price per share (Net Asset Value/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(100%-maximum sales charge))—Class A Shares | | | $ | 13.45 | | | | | $ | 13.11 | | | | | $ | 12.32 | | | | | $ | 11.82 | | | | | $ | 10.62 | | |
Investments in Affiliated Investment Companies, at cost(a) | | | $ | 27,119 | | | | | $ | 4,257,664 | | | | | $ | 4,843,501 | | | | | $ | 2,358,624 | | | | | $ | 13,886 | | |
Investments in non-affiliates, at cost | | | | 14,708,129 | | | | | | 42,704,801 | | | | | | 38,790,051 | | | | | | 18,791,536 | | | | | | 129,972 | | |
____________________
(a) | The investment in affiliated investment companies includes the HSBC Prime Money Market Fund, Class I Shares, HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Class I Shares and HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund, Class I Shares (See Note 1). |
(b) | Redemption Price per share varies by length of time shares are held. |
24 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
Statements of Operations—For the six months ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | Aggressive | | Balanced | | Moderate | | Conservative | | Income |
| | Strategy | | Strategy | | Strategy | | Strategy | | Strategy |
| | Fund | | Fund | | Fund | | Fund | | Fund (a) |
Investment Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income from non-affiliates | | | $ | 123,413 | | | | | $ | 927,926 | | | | | $ | 993,549 | | | | | $ | 486,770 | | | | | $ | 370 | | |
Investment Income from Affiliated Portfolios(b) | | | | 42,237 | | | | | | 92,142 | | | | | | 58,663 | | | | | | 16,806 | | | | | | — | | |
Investment Income from Affiliated Investment Companies | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | 33 | | |
Tax reclaims from Affiliated Portfolios(b) | | | | (102 | ) | | | | | (261 | ) | | | | | (222 | ) | | | | | (38 | ) | | | | | — | | |
Foreign tax withholding from Affiliated Portfolios(b) | | | | (703 | ) | | | | | (1,399 | ) | | | | | (1,178 | ) | | | | | (418 | ) | | | | | — | | |
Expenses from Affiliated Portfolios(b) | | | | (3,885 | ) | | | | | (8,258 | ) | | | | | (5,620 | ) | | | | | (1,717 | ) | | | | | — | | |
Total Investment Income (Loss) | | | | 160,960 | | | | | | 1,010,150 | | | | | | 1,045,192 | | | | | | 501,403 | | | | | | 403 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | | 41,806 | | | | | | 108,363 | | | | | | 85,495 | | | | | | 34,010 | | | | | | 31 | | |
Administration: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | 1,640 | | | | | | 4,524 | | | | | | 3,472 | | | | | | 1,262 | | | | | | 2 | | |
Class B Shares | | | | 1,173 | | | | | | 2,940 | | | | | | 2,933 | | | | | | 1,270 | | | | | | — | | |
Class C Shares | | | | 329 | | | | | | 1,042 | | | | | | 562 | | | | | | 359 | | | | | | — | | |
Distribution: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares | | | | 25,004 | | | | | | 68,856 | | | | | | 74,164 | | | | | | 34,670 | | | | | | 4 | | |
Class C Shares | | | | 6,817 | | | | | | 24,117 | | | | | | 14,068 | | | | | | 9,614 | | | | | | 4 | | |
Shareholder Servicing: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | 11,780 | | | | | | 35,454 | | | | | | 29,473 | | | | | | 11,598 | | | | | | 26 | | |
Class B Shares | | | | 8,338 | | | | | | 22,952 | | | | | | 24,721 | | | | | | 11,557 | | | | | | 1 | | |
Class C Shares | | | | 2,272 | | | | | | 8,039 | | | | | | 4,689 | | | | | | 3,204 | | | | | | 1 | | |
Accounting | | | | 11,456 | | | | | | 11,502 | | | | | | 11,512 | | | | | | 11,498 | | | | | | 629 | | |
Compliance Service | | | | 73 | | | | | | 220 | | | | | | 197 | | | | | | 82 | | | | | | 29 | | |
Custodian | | | | 9,600 | | | | | | 14,998 | | | | | | 15,859 | | | | | | 15,077 | | | | | | 2,727 | | |
Printing | | | | 9,777 | | | | | | 27,483 | | | | | | 24,959 | | | | | | 10,748 | | | | | | 1,937 | | |
Professional | | | | 1,559 | | | | | | 4,828 | | | | | | 4,367 | | | | | | 1,982 | | | | | | 143 | | |
Transfer Agent | | | | 27,448 | | | | | | 46,779 | | | | | | 42,169 | | | | | | 23,889 | | | | | | — | | |
Trustee | | | | 241 | | | | | | 708 | | | | | | 630 | | | | | | 277 | | | | | | 83 | | |
Registration fees | | | | 10,465 | | | | | | 9,808 | | | | | | 10,533 | | | | | | 7,796 | | | | | | 1,389 | | |
Other | | | | 740 | | | | | | 4,268 | | | | | | 3,139 | | | | | | 230 | | | | | | 1,613 | | |
Total expenses before fee reductions | | | | 170,518 | | | | | | 396,881 | | | | | | 352,942 | | | | | | 179,123 | | | | | | 8,619 | | |
Fees contractually reduced by Investment Adviser | | | | (8,321 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | (8,418 | ) | |
Net Expenses | | | | 162,197 | | | | | | 396,881 | | | | | | 352,942 | | | | | | 179,123 | | | | | | 201 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income (Loss) | | | | (1,237 | ) | | | | | 613,269 | | | | | | 692,250 | | | | | | 322,280 | | | | | | 202 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from affiliated investment securities(b) | | | | (53,107 | ) | | | | | 75,164 | | | | | | (15,486 | ) | | | | | (74,268 | ) | | | | | 79 | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from non-affiliated investment securities | | | | 74,394 | | | | | | 387,592 | | | | | | 449,876 | | | | | | 136,527 | | | | | | — | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on affiliated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
investments(b) | | | | 418,473 | | | | | | 897,984 | | | | | | 560,008 | | | | | | 210,896 | | | | | | 88 | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | | 883,290 | | | | | | 1,437,586 | | | | | | 896,641 | | | | | | 382,383 | | | | | | 938 | | |
Net realized/unrealized gains from investments | | | | 1,323,050 | | | | | | 2,818,326 | | | | | | 1,891,039 | | | | | | 655,538 | | | | | | 1,105 | | |
Change In Net Assets Resulting From Operations | | | $ | 1,321,813 | | | | | $ | 3,431,595 | | | | | $ | 2,583,289 | | | | | $ | 977,818 | | | | | $ | 1,307 | | |
____________________
(a) | Commenced operations on March 20, 2012. |
(b) | Represents amounts allocated from Affiliated Portfolios. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 25 |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | Aggressive Strategy Fund | | Balanced Strategy Fund |
| | For the | For the | | For the | For the |
| | six months ended | year ended | | six months ended | year ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 |
| | (Unaudited) | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | $ | (1,237 | ) | | | $ | 71,845 | | | | | $ | 613,269 | | | | $ | 1,133,159 | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investment | | | | 21,287 | | | | | 809,496 | | | | | | 462,756 | | | | | 2,228,606 | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
on investments | | | | 1,301,763 | | | | | (1,208,746 | ) | | | | | 2,355,570 | | | | | (3,222,925 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | | 1,321,813 | | | | | (327,405 | ) | | | | | 3,431,595 | | | | | 138,840 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | (77,669 | ) | | | | (68,444 | ) | | | | | (912,343 | ) | | | | (529,559 | ) | |
Class B Shares | | | | (8,596 | ) | | | | (15,713 | ) | | | | | (454,511 | ) | | | | (273,352 | ) | |
Class C Shares | | | | (6,139 | ) | | | | (3,532 | ) | | | | | (174,260 | ) | | | | (57,612 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
shareholder dividends | | | | (92,404 | ) | | | | (87,689 | ) | | | | | (1,541,114 | ) | | | | (860,523 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
capital transactions | | | | (507,915 | ) | | | | 4,163,237 | | | | | | (693,558 | ) | | | | 13,476,718 | | |
Change in net assets | | | | 721,494 | | | | | 3,748,143 | | | | | | 1,196,923 | | | | | 12,755,035 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | | 17,851,133 | | | | | 14,102,990 | | | | | | 53,487,631 | | | | | 40,732,596 | | |
End of period | | | $ | 18,572,627 | | | | $ | 17,851,133 | | | | | $ | 54,684,554 | | | | $ | 53,487,631 | | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | | $ | (68,200 | ) | | | $ | 25,441 | | | | | $ | (33,519 | ) | | | $ | 894,326 | | |
26 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| | Aggressive Strategy Fund | | Balanced Strategy Fund |
| | For the | For the | | For the | For the |
| | six months ended | year ended | | six months ended | year ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | |
CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | $ | 1,091,236 | | | | $ | 2,908,333 | | | | | $ | 2,786,021 | | | | $ | 9,775,737 | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 76,522 | | | | | 67,390 | | | | | | 896,978 | | | | | 519,067 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (963,504 | ) | | | | (1,486,297 | ) | | | | | (3,375,196 | ) | | | | (3,350,884 | ) | |
Class A Shares capital transactions | | | | 204,255 | | | | | 1,489,426 | | | | | | 307,803 | | | | | 6,943,920 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | 509,596 | | | | | 2,495,049 | | | | | | 1,375,106 | | | | | 6,586,320 | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 8,454 | | | | | 15,477 | | | | | | 449,537 | | | | | 271,439 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (955,626 | ) | | | | (1,134,162 | ) | | | | | (2,579,619 | ) | | | | (3,415,315 | ) | |
Class B Shares capital transactions | | | | (437,576 | ) | | | | 1,376,364 | | | | | | (754,976 | ) | | | | 3,442,444 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | 148,374 | | | | | 1,367,118 | | | | | | 611,227 | | | | | 3,926,550 | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 6,111 | | | | | 3,495 | | | | | | 170,621 | | | | | 55,493 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (429,078 | ) | | | | (73,166 | ) | | | | | (1,028,233 | ) | | | | (891,689 | ) | |
Class C Shares capital transactions | | | | (274,593 | ) | | | | 1,297,447 | | | | | | (246,385 | ) | | | | 3,090,354 | | |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
capital transactions | | | $ | (507,915 | ) | | | $ | 4,163,237 | | | | | $ | (693,558 | ) | | | $ | 13,476,718 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 87,657 | | | | | 228,057 | | | | | | 229,550 | | | | | 780,155 | | |
Reinvested | | | | 6,672 | | | | | 5,344 | | | | | | 78,890 | | | | | 42,166 | | |
Redeemed | | | | (77,708 | ) | | | | (118,554 | ) | | | | | (278,258 | ) | | | | (269,840 | ) | |
Change in Class A Shares | | | | 16,621 | | | | | 114,847 | | | | | | 30,182 | | | | | 552,481 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 42,757 | | | | | 203,126 | | | | | | 112,797 | | | | | 523,809 | | |
Reinvested | | | | 765 | | | | | 1,275 | | | | | | 39,468 | | | | | 22,032 | | |
Redeemed | | | | (80,349 | ) | | | | (93,254 | ) | | | | | (213,385 | ) | | | | (273,997 | ) | |
Change in Class B Shares | | | | (36,827 | ) | | | | 111,147 | | | | | | (61,120 | ) | | | | 271,844 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 12,466 | | | | | 109,935 | | | | | | 50,490 | | | | | 311,276 | | |
Reinvested | | | | 556 | | | | | 288 | | | | | | 14,967 | | | | | 4,490 | | |
Redeemed | | | | (36,221 | ) | | | | (5,872 | ) | | | | | (84,248 | ) | | | | (71,338 | ) | |
Change in Class C Shares | | | | (23,199 | ) | | | | 104,351 | | | | | | (18,791 | ) | | | | 244,428 | | |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 27 |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| | Moderate Strategy Fund | | Conservative Strategy Fund |
| | For the | For the | | For the | For the |
| | six months ended | year ended | | six months ended | year ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | $ | 692,250 | | | | $ | 1,266,033 | | | | | $ | 322,280 | | | | $ | 525,517 | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investment | | | | 434,390 | | | | | 2,274,619 | | | | | | 62,259 | | | | | 703,084 | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
on investments | | | | 1,456,649 | | | | | (2,997,283 | ) | | | | | 593,279 | | | | | (942,081 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | | 2,583,289 | | | | | 543,369 | | | | | | 977,818 | | | | | 286,520 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | (472,793 | ) | | | | (817,383 | ) | | | | | (200,567 | ) | | | | (330,918 | ) | |
Class B Shares | | | | (335,069 | ) | | | | (622,935 | ) | | | | | (173,491 | ) | | | | (300,422 | ) | |
Class C Shares | | | | (65,026 | ) | | | | (109,972 | ) | | | | | (46,100 | ) | | | | (62,316 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
shareholder dividends | | | | (872,888 | ) | | | | (1,550,290 | ) | | | | | (420,158 | ) | | | | (693,656 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
capital transactions | | | | (1,481,784 | ) | | | | 9,079,682 | | | | | | 1,560,122 | | | | | 4,961,528 | | |
Change in net assets | | | | 228,617 | | | | | 8,072,761 | | | | | | 2,117,782 | | | | | 4,554,392 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | | 47,900,371 | | | | | 39,827,610 | | | | | | 20,426,914 | | | | | 15,872,522 | | |
End of period | | | $ | 48,128,988 | | | | $ | 47,900,371 | | | | | $ | 22,544,696 | | | | $ | 20,426,914 | | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | | $ | (96,977 | ) | | | $ | 83,661 | | | | | $ | (55,011 | ) | | | $ | 42,867 | | |
28 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| | Moderate Strategy Fund | | Conservative Strategy Fund |
| | For the | For the | | For the | For the |
| | six months ended | year ended | | six months ended | year ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | |
CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | $ | 2,953,541 | | | | $ | 7,463,817 | | | | | $ | 1,795,956 | | | | $ | 3,277,051 | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 467,343 | | | | | 808,567 | | | | | | 190,103 | | | | | 315,473 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (3,452,694 | ) | | | | (3,002,506 | ) | | | | | (1,042,062 | ) | | | | (1,601,095 | ) | |
Class A Shares capital transactions | | | | (31,810 | ) | | | | 5,269,878 | | | | | | 943,997 | | | | | 1,991,429 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | 1,261,693 | | | | | 5,517,359 | | | | | | 1,214,164 | | | | | 3,315,754 | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 329,700 | | | | | 614,242 | | | | | | 164,404 | | | | | 292,525 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (2,783,444 | ) | | | | (3,739,911 | ) | | | | | (872,313 | ) | | | | (1,849,847 | ) | |
Class B Shares capital transactions | | | | (1,192,051 | ) | | | | 2,391,690 | | | | | | 506,255 | | | | | 1,758,432 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | 487,949 | | | | | 2,129,489 | | | | | | 502,055 | | | | | 1,363,626 | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 64,471 | | | | | 108,644 | | | | | | 43,333 | | | | | 61,050 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (810,343 | ) | | | | (820,019 | ) | | | | | (435,518 | ) | | | | (213,009 | ) | |
Class C Shares capital transactions | | | | (257,923 | ) | | | | 1,418,114 | | | | | | 109,870 | | | | | 1,211,667 | | |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
capital transactions | | | $ | (1,481,784 | ) | | | $ | 9,079,682 | | | | | $ | 1,560,122 | | | | $ | 4,961,528 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 258,288 | | | | | 639,024 | | | | | | 162,926 | | | | | 291,544 | | |
Reinvested | | | | 42,537 | | | | | 70,518 | | | | | | 17,722 | | | | | 28,698 | | |
Redeemed | | | | (303,088 | ) | | | | (256,954 | ) | | | | | (95,239 | ) | | | | (143,569 | ) | |
Change in Class A Shares | | | | (2,263 | ) | | | | 452,588 | | | | | | 85,409 | | | | | 176,673 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 110,335 | | | | | 469,305 | | | | | | 111,729 | | | | | 298,990 | | |
Reinvested | | | | 30,201 | | | | | 53,442 | | | | | | 15,550 | | | | | 26,862 | | |
Redeemed | | | | (244,353 | ) | | | | (322,256 | ) | | | | | (79,985 | ) | | | | (166,957 | ) | |
Change in Class B Shares | | | | (103,817 | ) | | | | 200,491 | | | | | | 47,294 | | | | | 158,895 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 43,635 | | | | | 186,946 | | | | | | 44,950 | | | | | 119,890 | | |
Reinvested | | | | 6,069 | | | | | 9,716 | | | | | | 3,987 | | | | | 5,467 | | |
Redeemed | | | | (72,686 | ) | | | | (72,771 | ) | | | | | (38,600 | ) | | | | (18,682 | ) | |
Change in Class C Shares | | | | (22,982 | ) | | | | 123,891 | | | | | | 10,337 | | | | | 106,675 | | |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 29 |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION OF FUNDS
Statement of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| Income Strategy Fund |
| For the |
| period ended |
| April 30, 2012 (a) |
| (Unaudited) |
Investment Activities: | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | $ | 202 | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investment | | | 79 | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from investments | | | 1,026 | | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | 1,307 | | |
| |
Dividends: | | | | | |
Net investment income: | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | (96 | ) | |
Class B Shares | | | (2 | ) | |
Class C Shares | | | (2 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from shareholder dividends | | | (100 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | | 147,993 | | |
Change in net assets | | | 149,200 | | |
| |
Net Assets: | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | — | | |
End of period | | $ | 149,200 | | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | $ | 102 | | |
____________________
(a) | Commenced operations on March 20, 2012. |
30 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION OF FUNDS
Statement of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| Income Strategy Fund |
| For the |
| period ended |
| April 30, 2012 (a) |
| (Unaudited) |
CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | $ | 153,880 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (20,685 | ) | |
Class A Shares capital transactions | | | 133,195 | | |
| |
Class B Shares: | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | 8,548 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (1,149 | ) | |
Class B Shares capital transactions | | | 7,399 | | |
| |
Class C Shares: | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | 8,548 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (1,149 | ) | |
Class C Shares capital transactions | | | 7,399 | | |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | $ | 147,993 | | |
| |
SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | |
Issued | | | 15,323 | | |
Redeemed | | | (2,058 | ) | |
Change in Class A Shares | | | 13,265 | | |
| |
Class B Shares: | | | | | |
Issued | | | 852 | | |
Redeemed | | | (114 | ) | |
Change in Class B Shares | | | 738 | | |
| |
Class C Shares: | | | | | |
Issued | | | 852 | | |
Redeemed | | | (114 | ) | |
Change in Class C Shares | | | 738 | | |
____________________
(a) | Commenced operations on March 20, 2012. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 31 |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.*
| | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Ratios of | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Realized and | | | | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Investment | | Expenses to | | | | | |
| | Net Asset | | Net | | Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | Realized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Income | | Average Net | | | | | |
| | Value, | | Investment | | Gains | | Total from | | Net | | Gains from | | | | | | | Net Asset | | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | (Loss) to | | Assets | | Portfolio |
| | Beginning | | Income | | (Losses) from | | Investment | | Investment | | Investment | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | Average | | (Excluding Fee | | Turnover |
| | of Period | | (Loss)(a) | | Investments | | Activities | | Income | | Transactions | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(b) | | (000’s) | | Assets(c) | | Net Assets(c) | | Reductions)(c) | | (b)(d) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 12.57 | | | | — | (e) | | | 2.98 | | | | | 2.98 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | $ | 15.55 | | | 23.71 | % | | | $ | 7,046 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | (0.03 | )% | | | | 2.27 | % | | | | 46 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 15.55 | | | | 0.02 | | | | (6.05 | ) | | | | (6.03 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.90 | ) | | | (0.90 | ) | | | | | 8.62 | | | (40.92 | )%(f) | | | | 4,572 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 0.13 | % | | | | 1.98 | % | | | | 72 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.62 | | | | 0.01 | | | | 1.57 | | | | | 1.58 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 10.20 | | | 18.33 | %(g) | | | | 5,426 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 0.09 | % | | | | 2.16 | % | | | | 53 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 10.20 | | | | 0.03 | | | | 1.80 | | | | | 1.83 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 12.03 | | | 17.94 | %(h) | | | | 7,886 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 0.24 | % | | | | 2.00 | % | | | | 50 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 12.03 | | | | 0.10 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | 0.03 | | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | — | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | | 11.96 | | | 0.20 | %(i) | | | | 9,217 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 0.77 | % | | | | 1.61 | % | | | | 71 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 11.96 | | | | 0.02 | | | | 0.90 | | | | | 0.92 | | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | — | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | | 12.78 | | | 7.80 | % | | | | 10,057 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 0.34 | % | | | | 1.58 | % | | | | 41 | % | |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 12.44 | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | 2.94 | | | | | 2.83 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | $ | 15.27 | | | 22.75 | % | | | $ | 4,942 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | (0.77 | )% | | | | 3.02 | % | | | | 46 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 15.27 | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | (5.90 | ) | | | | (5.98 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.90 | ) | | | (0.90 | ) | | | | | 8.39 | | | (41.36 | )%(f) | | | | 3,166 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | (0.62 | )% | | | | 2.73 | % | | | | 72 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.39 | | | | (0.06 | ) | | | 1.53 | | | | | 1.47 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 9.86 | | | 17.52 | %(g) | | | | 3,767 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | (0.66 | )% | | | | 2.91 | % | | | | 53 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 9.86 | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 1.73 | | | | | 1.68 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 11.54 | | | 17.04 | %(h) | | | | 5,519 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | (0.51 | )% | | | | 2.75 | % | | | | 50 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 11.54 | | | | — | (e) | | | (0.06 | ) | | | | (0.06 | ) | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | — | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | | 11.45 | | | (0.53 | )%(i) | | | | 6,750 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.02 | % | | | | 2.36 | % | | | | 71 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 11.45 | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | 0.85 | | | | | 0.83 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | 12.27 | | | 7.30 | % | | | | 6,784 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | (0.40 | )% | | | | 2.33 | % | | | | 41 | % | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 12.41 | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | 2.96 | | | | | 2.85 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | $ | 15.26 | | | 22.97 | % | | | $ | 528 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | (0.79 | )% | | | | 2.99 | % | | | | 46 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 15.26 | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | (5.89 | ) | | | | (5.97 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.90 | ) | | | (0.90 | ) | | | | | 8.39 | | | (41.32 | )%(f) | | | | 319 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | (0.64 | )% | | | | 2.73 | % | | | | 72 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.39 | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 1.51 | | | | | 1.46 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 9.85 | | | 17.40 | %(g) | | | | 289 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | (0.59 | )% | | | | 2.93 | % | | | | 53 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 9.85 | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 1.73 | | | | | 1.68 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 11.53 | | | 17.06 | %(h) | | | | 698 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | (0.47 | )% | | | | 2.76 | % | | | | 50 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 11.53 | | | | — | (e) | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | — | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | | 11.43 | | | (0.46 | )%(i) | | | | 1,884 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | — | %(j) | | | | 2.35 | % | | | | 71 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 11.43 | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | 0.85 | | | | | 0.83 | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | — | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | | 12.22 | | | 7.27 | % | | | | 1,732 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | (0.39 | )% | | | | 2.34 | % | | | | 41 | % | |
| * | The per share amounts and percentages reflect income and expenses assuming inclusion of the Fund’s proportionate share of the income and expenses of the applicable HSBC Portfolios, the Fund does not include expenses of the affiliated and unaffiliated investment companies, in which the Fund invests. |
| (a) | Calculated based on average shares outstanding. |
| (b) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any sales or redemption charges. |
| (c) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
| (d) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by aggregating the results of multiplying the Fund’s investment percentage in the Portfolios, affiliated and unaffiliated investments companies by their corresponding portfolio turnover rates. Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without distinguishing between classes of shares issued. |
| (e) | Rounds to less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
| (f) | During the year ended October 31, 2008, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The responding impact to the total return was 0.11%, 0.11% and 0.11% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
| (g) | During the year ended October 31, 2009, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.11%, 0.11% and 0.11% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
| (h) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.09%, 0.09% and 0.09% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
| (i) | During the year ended October 31, 2011, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.08%, 0.08% and 0.08% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
| (j) | Rounds to less than 0.005% or (0.005)% |
32 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.*
| | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios of | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Realized and | | | | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Expenses to | | | | | |
| | Net Asset | | Net | | Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | Realized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Investment | | Average Net | | | | | |
| | Value, | | Investment | | Gains | | Total from | | Net | | Gains from | | | | | | | Net Asset | | | | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | Income to | | Assets | | Portfolio |
| | Beginning | | Income | | (Losses) from | | Investment | | Investment | | Investment | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | Average | | (Excluding Fee | | Turnover |
| | of Period | | (Loss)(a) | | Investments | | Activities | | Income | | Transactions | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(b) | | (000’s) | | Assets(c) | | Net Assets(c) | | Reductions)(c) | | (b)(d) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 12.45 | | | | 0.11 | | | | 2.34 | | | | | 2.45 | | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | $ | 14.73 | | | | 19.92 | %(e) | | | | $ | 21,352 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 0.84 | % | | | | 1.65 | % | | | | 73 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 14.73 | | | | 0.12 | | | | (5.21 | ) | | | | (5.09 | ) | | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | (0.74 | ) | | | | (0.83 | ) | | | | | 8.81 | | | | (36.43 | )%(f) | | | | | 13,908 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 0.98 | % | | | | 1.53 | % | | | | 79 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.81 | | | | 0.07 | | | | 1.55 | | | | | 1.62 | | | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | | 10.34 | | | | 18.66 | %(g) | | | | | 15,304 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 0.84 | % | | | | 1.57 | % | | | | 48 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 10.34 | | | | 0.19 | | | | 1.64 | | | | | 1.83 | | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | | | 12.09 | | | | 17.79 | %(h) | | | | | 21,642 | | | | 1.25 | % | | | | 1.72 | % | | | | 1.30 | % | | | | 53 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 12.09 | | | | 0.32 | | | | (0.06 | ) | | | | 0.26 | | | | | (0.28 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.28 | ) | | | | | 12.07 | | | | 2.08 | %(i) | | | | | 28,262 | | | | 1.12 | % | | | | 2.60 | % | | | | 1.14 | % | | | | 74 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 12.07 | | | | 0.16 | | | | 0.61 | | | | | 0.77 | | | | | (0.39 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.39 | ) | | | | | 12.45 | | | | 6.71 | % | | | | | 29,544 | | | | 1.17 | % | | | | 2.65 | % | | | | 1.17 | % | | | | 35 | % | |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 12.43 | | | | 0.01 | | | | 2.34 | | | | | 2.35 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | | $ | 14.67 | | | | 18.98 | %(e) | | | | $ | 13,905 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.09 | % | | | | 2.40 | % | | | | 73 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 14.67 | | | | 0.03 | | | | (5.20 | ) | | | | (5.17 | ) | | | | — | (j) | | | | (0.74 | ) | | | | (0.74 | ) | | | | | 8.76 | | | | (36.95 | )%(f) | | | | | 9,516 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.24 | % | | | | 2.28 | % | | | | 79 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.76 | | | | 0.01 | | | | 1.55 | | | | | 1.56 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | 10.31 | | | | 17.80 | %(g) | | | | | 11,196 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.07 | % | | | | 2.31 | % | | | | 48 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 10.31 | | | | 0.11 | | | | 1.64 | | | | | 1.75 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | 12.05 | | | | 17.01 | %(h) | | | | | 15,593 | | | | 2.00 | % | | | | 0.97 | % | | | | 2.05 | % | | | | 53 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 12.05 | | | | 0.23 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | 0.16 | | | | | (0.20 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.20 | ) | | | | | 12.01 | | | | 1.30 | %(i) | | | | | 18,799 | | | | 1.87 | % | | | | 1.85 | % | | | | 1.90 | % | | | | 74 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 12.01 | | | | 0.11 | | | | 0.62 | | | | | 0.73 | | | | | (0.30 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.30 | ) | | | | | 12.44 | | | | 6.30 | % | | | | | 18,725 | | | | 1.92 | % | | | | 1.91 | % | | | | 1.92 | % | | | | 35 | % | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 12.48 | | | | 0.01 | | | | 2.35 | | | | | 2.36 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | $ | 14.74 | | | | 19.04 | %(e) | | | | $ | 1,273 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.07 | % | | | | 2.39 | % | | | | 73 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 14.74 | | | | 0.03 | | | | (5.22 | ) | | | | (5.19 | ) | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | (0.74 | ) | | | | (0.75 | ) | | | | | 8.80 | | | | (36.94 | )%(f) | | | | | 937 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.25 | % | | | | 2.29 | % | | | | 79 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.80 | | | | 0.01 | | | | 1.55 | | | | | 1.56 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | 10.35 | | | | 17.81 | %(g) | | | | | 1,507 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | 48 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 10.35 | | | | 0.12 | | | | 1.63 | | | | | 1.75 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | 12.09 | | | | 16.96 | %(h) | | | | | 3,497 | | | | 2.01 | % | | | | 1.04 | % | | | | 2.06 | % | | | | 53 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 12.09 | | | | 0.23 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | 0.16 | | | | | (0.21 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.21 | ) | | | | | 12.04 | | | | 1.25 | %(i) | | | | | 6,427 | | | | 1.87 | % | | | | 1.85 | % | | | | 1.90 | % | | | | 74 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 12.04 | | | | 0.12 | | | | 0.62 | | | | | 0.74 | | | | | (0.32 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.32 | ) | | | | | 12.46 | | | | 6.40 | % | | | | | 6,415 | | | | 1.92 | % | | | | 1.93 | % | | | | 1.92 | % | | | | 35 | % | |
* | The per share amounts and percentages reflect income and expenses assuming inclusion of the Fund’s proportionate share of the income and expenses of the applicable HSBC Portfolios, the Fund does not include expenses of the affiliated and unaffiliated investment companies, in which the Fund invests. |
(a) | Calculated based on average shares outstanding. |
(b) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any sales or redemption charges. |
(c) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(d) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by aggregating the results of multiplying the Fund’s investment percentage in the respective Portfolios, affiliated and unaffiliated investment companies by their corresponding portfolio turnover rates. Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without distinguishing between classes of shares issued. |
(e) | During the year ended October 31, 2007, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.23%, 0.24% and 0.23% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(f) | During the year ended October 31, 2008, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.15%, 0.15% and 0.15% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(g) | During the year ended October 31, 2009, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.11%, 0.11% and 0.11% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(h) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.07%, 0.07% and 0.07% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(i) | During the year ended October 31, 2011, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.06%, 0.06% and 0.06% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(j) | Rounds to less than $0.01 or $(0.01). |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 33 |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.*
| | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios of | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Realized and | | | | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Expenses to | | | | | |
| | Net Asset | | Net | | Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | Realized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Investment | | Average Net | | | | | |
| | Value, | | Investment | | Gains | | Total from | | Net | | Gains from | | Return | | | | | | | Net Asset | | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | Income to | | Assets | | Portfolio |
| | Beginning | | Income | | (Losses) from | | Investment | | Investment | | Investment | | of | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | Average | | (Excluding Fee | | Turnover |
| | of Period | | (Loss)(a) | | Investments | | Activities | | Income | | Transactions | | Capital | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(b) | | (000’s) | | Assets(c) | | Net Assets(c) | | Reductions)(c) | | (b)(d) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 11.71 | | | | 0.21 | | | | | 1.65 | | | | | 1.86 | | | | | (0.20 | ) | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.30 | ) | | | | $ | 13.27 | | | 16.12 | %(e) | | | $ | 20,140 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 1.70 | % | | | | 1.60 | % | | | | 93 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 13.27 | | | | 0.20 | | | | | (4.08 | ) | | | | (3.88 | ) | | | | (0.19 | ) | | | | (0.50 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.70 | ) | | | | | 8.69 | | | (30.65 | )%(f) | | | | 14,226 | | | | 1.48 | % | | | | 1.75 | % | | | | 1.48 | % | | | | 80 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.69 | | | | 0.13 | | | | | 1.39 | | | | | 1.52 | | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | | 10.09 | | | 17.75 | %(g) | | | | 15,909 | | | | 1.44 | % | | | | 1.47 | % | | | | 1.49 | % | | | | 41 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 10.09 | | | | 0.25 | | | | | 1.38 | | | | | 1.63 | | | | | (0.24 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.24 | ) | | | | | 11.48 | | | 16.39 | %(h) | | | | 18,921 | | | | 1.14 | % | | | | 2.33 | % | | | | 1.19 | % | | | | 67 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 11.48 | | | | 0.37 | | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | 0.25 | | | | | (0.44 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.44 | ) | | | | | 11.29 | | | 2.19 | %(i) | | | | 23,719 | | | | 1.06 | % | | | | 3.16 | % | | | | 1.09 | % | | | | 63 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 11.29 | | | | 0.19 | | | | | 0.45 | | | | | 0.64 | | | | | (0.23 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.23 | ) | | | | | 11.70 | | | 5.81 | % | | | $ | 24,551 | | | | 1.14 | % | | | | 3.30 | % | | | | 1.14 | % | | | | 34 | % | |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 11.72 | | | | 0.12 | | | | | 1.65 | | | | | 1.77 | | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.22 | ) | | | | $ | 13.27 | | | 15.25 | %(e) | | | $ | 16,513 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.95 | % | | | | 2.35 | % | | | | 93 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 13.27 | | | | 0.11 | | | | | (4.08 | ) | | | | (3.97 | ) | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | (0.50 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.61 | ) | | | | | 8.69 | | | (31.17 | )%(f) | | | | 12,354 | | | | 2.23 | % | | | | 1.00 | % | | | | 2.23 | % | | | | 80 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.69 | | | | 0.06 | | | | | 1.39 | | | | | 1.45 | | | | | (0.06 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.06 | ) | | | | | 10.08 | | | 16.82 | %(g) | | | | 14,230 | | | | 2.19 | % | | | | 0.71 | % | | | | 2.24 | % | | | | 41 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 10.08 | | | | 0.17 | | | | | 1.38 | | | | | 1.55 | | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | | 11.46 | | | 15.61 | %(h) | | | | 18,362 | | | | 1.89 | % | | | | 1.59 | % | | | | 1.94 | % | | | | 67 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 11.46 | | | | 0.28 | | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | 0.18 | | | | | (0.36 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.36 | ) | | | | | 11.28 | | | 1.51 | %(i) | | | | 20,323 | | | | 1.81 | % | | | | 2.40 | % | | | | 1.84 | % | | | | 63 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 11.28 | | | | 0.15 | | | | | 0.44 | | | | | 0.59 | | | | | (0.19 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.19 | ) | | | | | 11.68 | | | 5.34 | % | | | | 19,843 | | | | 1.89 | % | | | | 2.59 | % | | | | 1.89 | % | | | | 34 | % | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 11.47 | | | | 0.12 | | | | | 1.60 | | | | | 1.72 | | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.22 | ) | | | | $ | 12.97 | | | 15.20 | %(e) | | | $ | 1,766 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.95 | % | | | | 2.33 | % | | | | 93 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 12.97 | | | | 0.11 | | | | | (3.97 | ) | | | | (3.86 | ) | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | | (0.50 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.62 | ) | | | | | 8.49 | | | (31.09 | )%(f) | | | | 1,408 | | | | 2.23 | % | | | | 1.00 | % | | | | 2.23 | % | | | | 80 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.49 | | | | 0.06 | | | | | 1.35 | | | | | 1.41 | | | | | (0.06 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.06 | ) | | | | | 9.84 | | | 16.75 | %(g) | | | | 1,488 | | | | 2.19 | % | | | | 0.72 | % | | | | 2.24 | % | | | | 41 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 9.84 | | | | 0.17 | | | | | 1.35 | | | | | 1.52 | | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.18 | ) | | | | | 11.18 | | | 15.55 | %(h) | | | | 2,544 | | | | 1.90 | % | | | | 1.59 | % | | | | 1.95 | % | | | | 67 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 11.18 | | | | 0.27 | | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | | 0.16 | | | | | (0.36 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.36 | ) | | | | | 10.98 | | | 1.42 | %(i) | | | | 3,859 | | | | 1.81 | % | | | | 2.40 | % | | | | 1.84 | % | | | | 63 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 10.98 | | | | 0.14 | | | | | 0.44 | | | | | 0.58 | | | | | (0.19 | ) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.19 | ) | | | | | 11.37 | | | 5.40 | % | | | | 3,735 | | | | 1.89 | % | | | | 2.58 | % | | | | 1.90 | % | | | | 34 | % | |
* | The per share amounts and percentages reflect income and expenses assuming inclusion of the Fund’s proportionate share of the income and expenses of the applicable HSBC Portfolios, the Fund does not include expenses of the affiliated and unaffiliated investment companies, in which the Fund invests. |
(a) | Calculated based on average shares outstanding. |
(b) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any sales or redemption charges. |
(c) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(d) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by aggregating the results of multiplying the Fund’s investment percentage in the respective Portfolios, affiliated and unaffiliated investment companies by their corresponding portfolio turnover rates. Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without distinguishing between classes of shares issued. |
(e) | During the year ended October 31, 2007, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.41%, 0.41% and 0.33% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(f) | During the year ended October 31, 2008, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.19%, 0.19% and 0.19% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(g) | During the year ended October 31, 2009, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.09%, 0.09% and 0.09% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(h) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.06%, 0.06% and 0.06% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(i) | During the year ended October 31, 2011, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.04%, 0.04% and 0.04% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
34 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
CONSERVATIVE STRATEGY FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.*
| | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios of | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Realized and | | | | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Expenses to | | | | | |
| | Net Asset | | Net | | Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | Realized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Investment | | Average Net | | | | | |
| | Value, | | Investment | | Gains | | Total from | | Net | | Gains from | | | | | | | Net Asset | | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | Income to | | Assets | | Portfolio |
| | Beginning | | Income | | (Losses) from | | Investment | | Investment | | Investment | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | Average | | (Excluding Fee | | Turnover |
| | of Period | | (Loss)(a) | | Investments | | Activities | | Income | | Transactions | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(b) | | (000’s) | | Assets(c) | | Net Assets(c) | | Reductions)(c) | | (b)(d) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 11.11 | | | 0.29 | | | 1.03 | | | | | 1.32 | | | | | (0.27 | ) | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | (0.39 | ) | | | | $ | 12.04 | | | 12.13 | %(e) | | | $ | 6,669 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 2.52 | % | | | | 2.06 | % | | | | 89 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 12.04 | | | 0.24 | | | (2.93 | ) | | | | (2.69 | ) | | | | (0.25 | ) | | | | (0.26 | ) | | | | (0.51 | ) | | | | | 8.84 | | | (23.17 | )%(f) | | | | 4,747 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 2.24 | % | | | | 1.72 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.84 | | | 0.14 | | | 1.16 | | | | | 1.30 | | | | | (0.13 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.13 | ) | | | | | 10.01 | | | 14.95 | %(g) | | | | 5,059 | | | | 1.50 | % | | | | 1.53 | % | | | | 1.62 | % | | | | 34 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 10.01 | | | 0.26 | | | 1.11 | | | | | 1.37 | | | | | (0.23 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.23 | ) | | | | | 11.15 | | | 13.86 | %(h) | | | | 7,139 | | | | 1.38 | % | | | | 2.42 | % | | | | 1.43 | % | | | | 78 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 11.15 | | | 0.36 | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | 0.26 | | | | | (0.46 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.46 | ) | | | | | 10.95 | | | 2.40 | %(i) | | | | 8,946 | | | | 1.19 | % | | | | 3.21 | % | | | | 1.22 | % | | | | 54 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 10.95 | | | 0.19 | | | 0.33 | | | | | 0.52 | | | | | (0.24 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.24 | ) | | | | | 11.23 | | | 4.89 | % | | | | 10,133 | | | | 1.29 | % | | | | 3.47 | % | | | | 1.29 | % | | | | 34 | % | |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 11.01 | | | 0.20 | | | 1.05 | | | | | 1.25 | | | | | (0.20 | ) | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | (0.32 | ) | | | | $ | 11.94 | | | 11.51 | %(e) | | | $ | 4,928 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 1.77 | % | | | | 2.82 | % | | | | 89 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 11.94 | | | 0.16 | | | (2.91 | ) | | | | (2.75 | ) | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | (0.26 | ) | | | | (0.43 | ) | | | | | 8.76 | | | (23.76 | )%(f) | | | | 4,348 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 1.48 | % | | | | 2.48 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 8.76 | | | 0.07 | | | 1.15 | | | | | 1.22 | | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | | 9.91 | | | 14.05 | %(g) | | | | 4,907 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.77 | % | | | | 2.38 | % | | | | 34 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 9.91 | | | 0.17 | | | 1.10 | | | | | 1.27 | | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | | | 11.02 | | | 12.94 | %(h) | | | | 7,411 | | | | 2.14 | % | | | | 1.68 | % | | | | 2.19 | % | | | | 78 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 11.02 | | | 0.27 | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | 0.18 | | | | | (0.38 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.38 | ) | | | | | 10.82 | | | 1.68 | %(i) | | | | 8,995 | | | | 1.94 | % | | | | 2.46 | % | | | | 1.97 | % | | | | 54 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 10.82 | | | 0.15 | | | 0.32 | | | | | 0.47 | | | | | (0.20 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.20 | ) | | | | | 11.09 | | | 4.48 | % | | | | 9,744 | | | | 2.04 | % | | | | 2.74 | % | | | | 2.04 | % | | | | 34 | % | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 11.24 | | | 0.21 | | | 1.11 | | | | | 1.32 | | | | | (0.19 | ) | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | (0.31 | ) | | | | $ | 12.25 | | | 11.97 | %(e) | | | $ | 437 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 1.78 | % | | | | 2.85 | % | | | | 89 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 12.25 | | | 0.16 | | | (2.98 | ) | | | | (2.82 | ) | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | (0.26 | ) | | | | (0.43 | ) | | | | | 9.00 | | | (23.73 | )%(f) | | | | 430 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 1.46 | % | | | | 2.48 | % | | | | 69 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 9.00 | | | 0.07 | | | 1.18 | | | | | 1.25 | | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | | 10.18 | | | 13.97 | %(g) | | | | 485 | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 0.78 | % | | | | 2.37 | % | | | | 34 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 10.18 | | | 0.18 | | | 1.14 | | | | | 1.32 | | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | | 11.33 | | | 13.07 | %(h) | | | | 1,323 | | | | 2.16 | % | | | | 1.71 | % | | | | 2.21 | % | | | | 78 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 11.33 | | | 0.28 | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | 0.18 | | | | | (0.39 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.39 | ) | | | | | 11.12 | | | 1.57 | %(i) | | | | 2,486 | | | | 1.94 | % | | | | 2.49 | % | | | | 1.96 | % | | | | 54 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | 11.12 | | | 0.15 | | | 0.34 | | | | | 0.49 | | | | | (0.20 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.20 | ) | | | | | 11.41 | | | 4.51 | % | | | | 2,668 | | | | 2.04 | % | | | | 2.74 | % | | | | 2.04 | % | | | | 34 | % | |
* | The per share amounts and percentages reflect income and expenses assuming inclusion of the Fund’s proportionate share of the income and expenses of the applicable HSBC Portfolios, the Fund does not include expenses of the affiliated and unaffiliated investment companies, in which the Fund invests. |
(a) | Calculated Based on average shares outstanding |
(b) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any sales or redemption charges. |
(c) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(d) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by aggregating the results of multiplying the Fund’s investment percentage in the respective Portfolios, affiliated and unaffiliated investment companies by their corresponding portfolio turnover rates. Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without distinguishing between classes of shares issued. |
(e) | During the year ended October 31, 2007, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.44%, 0.47% and 0.48% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(f) | During the year ended October 31, 2008, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.19%, 0.19% and 0.19% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(g) | During the year ended October 31, 2009, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.08%, 0.08% and 0.08% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(h) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.05%, 0.05% and 0.05% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
(i) | During the year ended October 31, 2011, certain HSBC Portfolios, in which the Fund invests, received monies related to certain nonrecurring litigation settlements. The corresponding impact to the total return was 0.02%, 0.02% and 0.02% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 35 |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.*
| | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | Net Realized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios of | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Expenses to | | | | | |
| | Net Asset | | Net | | Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Investment | | Average | | | | | |
| | Value, | | Investment | | Gains | | Total from | | Net | | | | | | | Net Asset | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | Income to | | Net Assets | | Portfolio |
| | Beginning | | Income | | (Losses) from | | Investment | | Investment | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | Average | | (Excluding Fee | | Turnover |
| | of Period | | (Loss)(a) | | Investments | | Activities | | Income | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(b) | | (000’s) | | Assets(c) | | Net Assets(c) | | Reductions)(c) | | (b)(d) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited)(e) | | | $ | 10.00 | | | 0.02 | | 0.11 | | 0.13 | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | $ | 10.12 | | | 1.27% | | | $ | 13 | | | 1.50% | | 1.66% | | 67.40% | | | 46 | % | |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited)(e) | | | | 10.00 | | | 0.01 | | 0.10 | | 0.11 | | | — | (f) | | | | — | (f) | | | | | 10.11 | | | 1.12% | | | | 1 | | | 2.25% | | 0.91% | | 68.04% | | | 46 | % | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited)(e) | | | | 10.00 | | | 0.01 | | 0.10 | | 0.11 | | | — | (f) | | | | — | (f) | | | | | 10.11 | | | 1.12% | | | | 1 | | | 2.25% | | 0.91% | | 68.04% | | | 46 | % | |
(a) | Calculated based on average shares outstanding. |
(b) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any sales or redemption charges. |
(c) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(d) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without the distinguishing between the classes of shares issued. |
(e) | Commenced operations on March 20, 2012. |
(f) | Represents less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
36 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
1. Organization:
The HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds) (the “Trust”), a Massachusetts business trust organized on April 22, 1987, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as open-end management investment company. As of April 30, 2012, the Trust is comprised of 16 separate operational funds, each a series of the HSBC Family of Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Family of Funds), which also includes the HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and the HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (collectively the “Trusts”). The accompanying financial statements are presented for the following 5 funds (individually a “Fund”, collectively the “World Selection Funds”):
| Fund | |
| Aggressive Strategy Fund |
| Balanced Strategy Fund |
| Moderate Strategy Fund |
| Conservative Strategy Fund |
| Income Strategy Fund |
All of the World Selection Funds are diversified funds. Financial statements for all other funds of the Trusts are published separately.
The World Selection Funds, excluding the Income Strategy Fund, (the “World Selection Feeder Funds”) currently invest in the HSBC Growth Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Growth Portfolio) and HSBC Opportunity Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Opportunity Portfolio) (individually a “Portfolio,” collectively the “Portfolios”), each of which is a diversified series of the HSBC Portfolios (the “Portfolio Trust”). The Portfolios operate as master funds in master-feeder arrangements in addition to receiving investments from the World Selection Feeder Funds.
Each of the World Selection Funds is a “fund of funds,” meaning that it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in a combination of mutual funds managed by HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”) (the “Affiliated Underlying Funds”), as well as mutual funds managed by other investment advisers and exchange-traded funds (“Unaffiliated Underlying Funds” and, together with the Affiliated Underlying Funds, the “Underlying Funds”). Each World Selection Fund may also purchase and hold Exchange Traded Notes (“ETNs”), which are debt securities issued by financial institutions that pay returns based on the performance of a market index or other reference asset. The Underlying Funds may include private equity funds and real estate funds that are organized as mutual funds or Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”). Each World Selection Fund invests according to the investment objectives and strategies described in its Prospectus.
The financial statements of the Portfolios, including the Schedules of Portfolio Investments, are included elsewhere in this report. The financial statements of the Portfolios should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the World Selection Feeder Funds.
The World Selection Funds are authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with a par value of $0.001 per share. Each Fund offers three classes of shares: Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares. Class A Shares of the World Selection Funds (except, the Income Strategy Fund) have a maximum sales charge of 5.00% as a percentage of the original purchase price. The Income Strategy Fund has a maximum sales charge of 4.75% as a percentage of the original purchase price. Class B Shares of the World Selection Funds are offered without any front-end sales charge, but will be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) ranging from a maximum of 4.00% if redeemed less than one year after purchase to 0.00% if redeemed more than four years after purchase. Class C Shares of the World Selection Funds are offered without any front-end sales charge, but will be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00% if redeemed less than one year after purchase. Each class of shares in the World Selection Funds has identical rights and privileges except with respect to arrangements pertaining to shareholder servicing or distribution, class-related expenses, voting rights on matters affecting a single class of shares, and the exchange privileges of each class of shares.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, the World Selection Funds’ officers and Trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the World Selection Funds. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Trust enters into contracts with its service providers, which also provide for indemnifications by the World Selection Funds. The World Selection Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve any future claims that may be made against the World Selection Funds. However, based on experience, the Trust expects the risk of loss to be remote.
| HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 37 |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
2. Significant Accounting Policies:
The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the World Selection Funds in the preparation of their financial statements. The policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities Valuation:
The World Selection Funds record their investments in the Underlying Funds at the net asset value reported by those funds. The World Selection Feeder Funds record their investments in the Portfolios at fair value. The underlying securities of the Portfolios are recorded at fair value, as more fully discussed in the notes to those financial statements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value in funds or portfolios in which the World Selection Funds are invested are described in their respective notes to financial statements.
Investment Transactions and Related Income:
The World Selection Feeder Funds record daily their proportionate income, expenses and unrealized/realized gains and losses derived from their respective Portfolios. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for the Underlying Funds. Changes in holdings of the Underlying Funds for each World Selection Fund are reflected not later than one business day after trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, changes in holdings of the Underlying Funds are accounted for on trade date. In addition, the World Selection Funds accrue their own expenses daily.
Allocations:
Expenses directly attributable to a Fund are charged to that Fund. Expenses not directly attributable to a Fund are allocated proportionately among the applicable series within the Trusts in relation to the net assets of each fund or on another reasonable basis. Class specific expenses are charged directly to the class incurring the expense. In addition, income, expenses (other than class specific expenses), and unrealized/realized gains and losses are allocated to each class based on relative net assets on a daily basis.
Dividends to Shareholders:
Dividends to shareholders from net investment income, if any, are declared and distributed monthly in the case of the Income Strategy Fund, quarterly in the case of the Moderate Strategy Fund and Conservative Strategy Fund, and annually in the case of the Aggressive Strategy Fund and Balanced Strategy Fund.
The World Selection Funds’ net realized gains, if any, are distributed to shareholders at least annually. Additional distributions are also made to the World Selection Funds’ shareholders to the extent necessary to avoid the federal excise tax on certain undistributed income and net capital gains of regulated investment companies.
The amount and character of net investment income and net realized gains distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations which may differ from GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., reclassification of market discounts, certain gain/loss, paydowns, and certain distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets; temporary differences (e.g., wash losses and post-October loss deferrals) do not require reclassification. The World Selection Funds may utilize equalization accounting for tax purposes and designate earnings and profits, including net realized gains distributed to shareholders on redemption of shares, as a part of the dividends paid deduction for income tax purposes. To the extent distributions to shareholders from net investment income and net realized gains exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes, they are reported as distributions of capital.
38 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS | |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Federal Income Taxes:
Each Fund is a separate taxable entity for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund has qualified and intends to continue to qualify each year as a “regulated investment company” under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and to distribute substantially all of its taxable net investment income and net realized gains, if any, to its shareholders. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is required.
Management of the Funds has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
3. Investment Valuation Summary:
The valuation techniques employed by the World Selection Funds, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the World Selection Funds’ investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
- Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
- Level 2: other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
- Level 3: significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
The World Selection Funds record their investments in the Underlying Funds at the net asset value reported by those funds and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. The World Selection Feeder Funds record their investments in their respective Portfolios at fair value and are typically categorized as a Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The underlying securities of the Portfolios are recorded at fair value, as discussed more fully in the Notes to Financial Statements of the Portfolios included in this report.
For the period ended April 30, 2012, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of April 30, 2012 in valuing the World Selection Funds’ investments based upon the three levels defined above:
| | | LEVEL 1($) | | LEVEL 2($) | | LEVEL 3($) | | Total($) |
| Aggressive Strategy Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Affiliated Investment Company | | 27,119 | | — | | | — | | | 27,119 |
| Affiliated Portfolios (a) | | — | | 3,500,620 | | | — | | | 3,500,620 |
| Unaffiliated Investment Companies | | 10,443,045 | | — | | | — | | | 10,443,045 |
| Exchange Traded Funds | | 4,601,404 | | — | | | — | | | 4,601,404 |
| Total Investment Securities | | 15,071,568 | | 3,500,620 | | | — | | | 18,572,188 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balanced Strategy Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Affiliated Investment Companies | | 4,406,940 | | — | | | — | | | 4,406,940 |
| Affiliated Portfolios (a) | | — | | 7,537,008 | | | — | | | 7,537,008 |
| Unaffiliated Investment Companies | | 31,250,419 | | — | | | — | | | 31,250,419 |
| Exchange Traded Funds | | 11,588,978 | | — | | | — | | | 11,588,978 |
| Total Investment Securities | | 47,246,337 | | 7,537,008 | | | — | | | 54,783,345 |
| HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 39 |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
| | LEVEL 1($) | | LEVEL 2($) | | LEVEL 3($) | | Total($) |
Moderate Strategy Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Investment Companies | | 5,030,669 | | — | | | — | | | 5,030,669 |
Affiliated Portfolios (a) | | — | | 4,372,823 | | | — | | | 4,372,823 |
Unaffiliated Investment Companies | | 31,829,166 | | — | | | — | | | 31,829,166 |
Exchange Traded Funds | | 6,978,083 | | | | | — | | | 6,978,083 |
Total Investment Securities | | 43,837,918 | | 4,372,823 | | | — | | | 48,210,741 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Conservative Strategy Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Investment Companies | | 2,358,624 | | — | | | — | | | 2,358,624 |
Affiliated Portfolios (a) | | — | | 1,251,564 | | | — | | | 1,251,564 |
Unaffiliated Investment Companies | | 17,087,499 | | — | | | — | | | 17,087,499 |
Exchange Traded Funds | | 1,841,950 | | — | | | — | | | 1,841,950 |
Total Investment Securities | | 21,288,073 | | 1,251,564 | | | — | | | 22,539,637 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Income Strategy Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Investment Companies | | 13,974 | | — | | | — | | | 13,974 |
Unaffiliated Investment Companies | | 128,813 | | — | | | — | | | 128,813 |
Exchange Traded Funds | | 2,096 | | — | | | — | | | 2,096 |
Total Investment Securities | | 144,883 | | — | | | — | | | 144,883 |
____________________
(a) Investments in Affiliated Portfolios represent ownership interests in the Portfolios. Due to the Funds’ master-feeder structure, the inputs used for valuing these instruments are categorized as Level 2.
The Trust recognizes significant transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. There were no significant transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 as of April 30, 2012 from the valuation input levels used on October 31, 2011.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04 (“ASU 2011-04”), “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS”. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 will have no effect on each Fund’s net assets. At this time, management is evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2011-04 on the financial statement disclosures.
4. Related Party Transactions:
Investment Management:
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA), Inc. (“HSBC” or the “Investment Adviser”), a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC Bank USA, N.A., a national bank organized under the laws of the United States, acts as investment adviser to the World Selection Funds. As Investment Adviser, HSBC manages the investments of the World Selection Funds and continuously reviews, supervises and administers the World Selection Funds’ investments pursuant to an Investment Advisory Contract. For its services as Investment Adviser, HSBC is entitled to receive a fee, computed daily and paid monthly, based on average daily net assets, at an annual rate of 0.25% for each Fund.
40 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Administration:
HSBC serves the Trusts as Administrator. Under the terms of the Administration Agreement, HSBC received from the Trusts a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of:
| Based on Average Daily Net Assets of | | Fee Rate(%) |
| Up to $10 billion | 0.0550 |
| In excess of $10 billion but not exceeding $20 billion | 0.0350 |
| In excess of $20 billion but not exceeding $50 billion | 0.0275 |
| In excess of $50 billion | 0.0250 |
The fee breakpoints are determined on the basis of the aggregate average daily net assets of the Trusts. The fee is allocated to each series of the Trusts based upon its proportionate share of the aggregate net assets. For assets invested in the Portfolios by World Selection Feeder Funds, the Portfolios pay half of the administration fee and the World Selection Feeder Funds pay half, for a combination of the total fee rate above. Certain administration fees of the Portfolios also may be reduced by treating them as apportioned in part to other funds making investments in the Portfolios in master-feeder structures. An amount equal to 50% of the administration fee is deemed to be class-specific.
Pursuant to a Sub-Administration Agreement with HSBC, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., serves as the Sub-Administrator for the Trusts subject to the general supervision by the Trusts’ Board (the “Board’’) and HSBC. For these services, Citi is entitled to a fee, payable by HSBC, at an annual rate equivalent to the fee rates set forth above subject to certain reductions associated with services provided to new funds minus 0.02%, which is retained by HSBC.
Under a Compliance Services Agreement between the Trusts and Citi (the “CCO Agreement’’), Citi makes an employee available to serve as the Trusts’ Chief Compliance Officer (the “CCO’’). Under the CCO Agreement, Citi also provides infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Trusts’ compliance program, including support services to the CCO. For the services provided under the CCO Agreement, the Trusts paid Citi $140,088 for the period ended April 30, 2012, plus reimbursement of certain out of pocket expenses. Expenses incurred by each Fund are reflected on the Statements of Operations as “Compliance Services.’’ Citi pays the salary and other compensation earned by individuals performing these services, as employees of Citi.
Distribution Arrangements:
Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. (“Foreside”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foreside Financial Group LLC, serves the Trusts as Distributor (the “Distributor’’). The Trust has adopted a non-compensatory Distribution Plan and Agreement (the “Distribution Plan’’) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Act. The Distribution Plan provides for reimbursement of expenses incurred by the Distributor related to distribution and marketing, at a rate not to exceed 0.25%, 1.00%, and 1.00% of the average daily net assets of Class A Shares (currently not being charged), Class B Shares (currently charging 0.75%), and Class C Shares (currently charging 0.75%) of the World Selection Funds, respectively. For the period ended April 30, 2012, Foreside, as Distributor, also received $179,432, $158,225 and $17,218 in commissions from sales of the Trusts, for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, and Class C Shares, respectively of which $25, $6, and $- were reallocated to HSBC-affiliated brokers and dealers, for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, and Class C Shares, respectively.
Shareholder Servicing:
The Trust has adopted a Shareholder Services Plan which provides for payments to shareholder servicing agents (which currently consist of HSBC and its affiliates) for providing various shareholder services. For performing these services, the shareholder servicing agents receive a fee that is computed daily and paid monthly up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each of the Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares of the World Selection Funds. The fees paid to the Distributor pursuant to the Distribution Plan and to shareholder servicing agents pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan currently are not intended to exceed, in the aggregate, 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class A Shares and 1.00% of the average daily net assets of Class B Shares and Class C Shares.
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 41
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Fund Accounting and Transfer Agency:
Citi provides fund accounting and transfer agency services for each Fund. As transfer agent, Citi receives a fee based on the number of funds and shareholder accounts, subject to certain minimums, reductions associated with services provided to new funds and reimbursement of certain expenses. As fund accountant, Citi receives an annual fee per series and share class, subject to minimums, reductions associated with services provided to new funds and reimbursement of certain expenses. Citi receives additional fees paid by the Trust for blue sky exemption services.
Independent Trustees:
Prior to January 1, 2012, the Trusts, in the aggregate, paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $63,000, a fee of $5,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended, a fee of $3,000 for each special telephonic meeting attended, and a fee of $5,000 for each special in-person meeting attended. The Trusts also paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $3,000 for each Committee on which such Trustee served as a Committee member as well as a fee of $3,000 for each Committee meeting attended. Additionally, the Trusts paid each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $6,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit Committee, who received a retainer of $8,000. The Trusts also paid Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $20,000, as well as an additional $4,000 for each regular meeting of the Board attended. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee was compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
Effective January 1, 2012, the Trusts pay each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $100,000. The Trusts pay a fee of $10,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended and a fee of $3,000 for each special meeting attended. The Trusts pay each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $3,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit Committee, who receives a retainer of $6,000. The Trusts also pay Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $24,000. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee is compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
Fee Reductions:
The Investment Adviser has agreed to contractually limit from March 1, 2012 through March 1, 2013 the total expenses, exclusive of interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, estimated indirect expenses attributable to the Fund’s investments in investment companies other than the HSBC Growth Portfolio and the HSBC Opportunity Portfolio, and extraordinary expenses of the World Selection Funds. Each Fund Class has its own expense limitations based on the average daily net assets for any full fiscal year as follows: Class A Shares 1.50%, Class B Shares 2.25%, Class C Shares 2.25%.
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Investment Adviser will be subject to repayment by the respective Fund to the Investment Adviser within three years to the extent that the repayment will not cause the Fund’s operating expenses to exceed the contractual expense limit that was in effect at the time of such waiver or reimbursement. During the period ended April 30, 2012, the Investment Adviser did not recapture any of its prior contractual waivers or reimbursements. As of April 30, 2012, the repayments that may potentially be made by the Funds are as follows:
Fund | | | 2015* | | 2014* | | 2013* | | 2012* | | Total |
Aggressive Strategy Fund | | $ | 8,321 | | $ | 19,298 | | $ | 56,869 | | $ | 49,257 | | $ | 133,745 |
Balanced Strategy Fund | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,289 | | | 3,289 |
Conservative Strategy Fund | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6,592 | | | 6,592 |
Income Strategy Fund | | | 8,418 | | | N/A | | | N/A | | | N/A | | | 8,418 |
____________________
* The year listed above the amounts is the fiscal year ending in which the amounts will no longer be recoupable.
The Administrator and Citi may voluntarily waive/reimburse fees to help support the expense limits of each Fund. In addition, HSBC, in its role as Investment Adviser and Administrator, may waive/reimburse additional fees at its discretion. Any voluntary fee waivers/reimbursements are not subject to recoupment in subsequent fiscal periods. Voluntary waivers/reimbursements may be stopped at any time. Amounts waived/reimbursed by the Investment Adviser, Administrator, and Citi are reported separately on the Statements of Operations, as applicable.
42 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
5. Investment Transactions:
Cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) for the period ended April 30, 2012 were as follows:
| Fund | | | Purchases | | Sales |
| Aggressive Strategy Fund | | $ | 13,137,740 | | $ | 5,354,591 |
| Balanced Strategy Fund | | | 32,423,382 | | | 14,610,530 |
| Moderate Strategy Fund | | | 24,449,434 | | | 13,355,014 |
| Conservative Strategy Fund | | | 11,396,734 | | | 6,420,814 |
| Income Strategy Fund | | | 171,115 | | | 28,904 |
| | | | | | | |
| Contributions and withdrawals of the respective Portfolios for the period ended April 30, 2012 totaled: |
| | | | |
| Fund | | | Contributions | | Withdrawals |
| Aggressive Strategy Fund | | $ | 9,284,129 | | $ | 10,053,518 |
| Balanced Strategy Fund | | | 24,775,444 | | | 27,366,681 |
| Moderate Strategy Fund | | | 16,092,944 | | | 18,778,951 |
| Conservative Strategy Fund | | | 7,280,653 | | | 6,418,891 |
6. Federal Tax Information:
At April 30, 2012, the cost basis of securities (which excludes investments in the Affiliated Portfolios) for federal income tax purposes, gross unrealized appreciation, gross unrealized depreciation and net unrealized appreciation/depreciation were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Unrealized |
| | | | | | | Tax Unrealized | | Tax Unrealized | | Appreciation/ |
| Fund | | | Tax Cost($) | | Appreciation($) | | Depreciation($) | | (Depreciation)($) |
| Aggressive Strategy Fund | | | 14,739,489 | | | | 602,108 | | | | (270,029 | ) | | | | 332,079 | |
| Balanced Strategy Fund | | | 46,986,755 | | | | 1,580,571 | | | | (1,320,989 | ) | | | | 259,582 | |
| Moderate Strategy Fund | | | 43,647,011 | | | | 1,284,986 | | | | (1,094,079 | ) | | | | 190,907 | |
| Conservative Strategy Fund | | | 21,155,141 | | | | 435,842 | | | | (302,910 | ) | | | | 132,932 | |
| Income Strategy Fund | | | 143,858 | | | | 1,146 | | | | (121 | ) | | | | 1,025 | |
The tax character of dividends paid by the World Selection Funds as of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, was as follows:
| | Dividends paid from |
| | Ordinary | | Net Long Term | | Total Taxable | | Total Dividends |
| | Income | | Capital Gains | | Dividends | | Paid(1) |
Aggressive Strategy Fund | | $ | 87,689 | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 87,689 | | | | $ | 87,689 | |
Balanced Strategy Fund | | | 860,523 | | | | — | | | | | 860,523 | | | | | 860,523 | |
Moderate Strategy Fund | | | 1,550,290 | | | | — | | | | | 1,550,290 | | | | | 1,550,290 | |
Conservative Strategy Fund | | | 693,656 | | | | — | | | | | 693,656 | | | | | 693,656 | |
____________________
(1) | Total dividends paid may differ from the amount reported in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 43
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
As of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis for the World Selection Funds were as follows:
| | Undistributed | | Undistributed | | | | | | | Accumulated | | Unrealized | | Total |
| | Ordinary | | Long Term | | Accumulated | | Capital and | | Appreciation/ | | Accumulated |
| | Income | | Capital Gains | | Earnings | | Other Losses | | (Depreciation)(1) | | Earnings/(Deficit) |
Aggressive Strategy Fund | | | $ | 25,426 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 25,426 | | | | $ | (378,953 | ) | | | | $ | (65,201 | ) | | | | $ | (418,728 | ) | |
Balanced Strategy Fund | | | | 894,298 | | | | | — | | | | | 894,298 | | | | | (907,683 | ) | | | | | (76,466 | ) | | | | | (89,851 | ) | |
Moderate Strategy Fund | | | | 83,634 | | | | | — | | | | | 83,634 | | | | | (709,490 | ) | | | | | 17,527 | | | | | | (608,329 | ) | |
Conservative Strategy Fund | | | | 42,858 | | | | | — | | | | | 42,858 | | | | | (18,849 | ) | | | | | (62,044 | ) | | | | | (38,035 | ) | |
____________________
(1) | The differences between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation are attributable primarily to: tax deferral of losses on wash sales, the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains/losses on certain derivative instruments, the difference between book and tax amortization methods for premium and market discount, the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains/losses on investments in passive foreign investment companies, and the return of capital adjustments from real estate investment trusts. |
As of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the following World Selection Funds have net capital loss carryforwards, which are available to offset future realized gains, if any, to the extent provided by the Treasury regulations.
| Fund | | Amount($) | | Expires |
| Aggressive Strategy Fund | 378,953 | | 2017 |
| Balanced Strategy Fund | 907,683 | | 2017 |
| Moderate Strategy Fund | 709,490 | | 2017 |
| Conservative Strategy Fund | 18,849 | | 2017 |
During the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the following Funds utilized capital loss carryforwards to offset capital gains realized:
| Fund | | Amount($) |
| Aggressive Strategy Fund | 775,892 |
| Balanced Strategy Fund | 2,086,359 |
| Moderate Strategy Fund | 2,012,944 |
| Conservative Strategy Fund | 581,583 |
The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “RIC Modernization Act”) was signed into law on December 22, 2010. The RIC Modernization Act makes changes to several tax rules impacting the Funds. The provisions of the RIC Modernization Act will generally be effective for each Fund’s tax year ending October 31, 2012. The RIC Modernization Act allows for capital losses originating in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 (“post-enactment capital losses”) to be carried forward indefinitely. However, the RIC Modernization Act requires any future capital gains to be first offset by post-enactment capital losses before using capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning prior to the effective date of the RIC Modernization Act. As a result of this ordering rule, capital loss carryforwards incurred in taxable years beginning prior to the effective date of the RIC Modernization Act have an increased likelihood of expiring unused. Furthermore, post-enactment capital losses will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term capital losses as under previous law.
The RIC Modernization Act also contains provisions which are intended to reduce the circumstances under which a regulated investment company would distribute amounts in excess of such income and gains or be required to file amended tax reporting information to its shareholders and the Internal Revenue Service. Information regarding any further effect of the RIC Modernization Act on the Funds, if any, will be contained within the “Federal Taxes” section of the financial statement notes for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2012.
7. Ownership and Principal Holders
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a Fund creates presumptions of control of the Fund, under section 2 (a)(9) of the 1940 Act. As of April 30, 2012, the Income Strategy Fund had individual shareholder accounts and/or omnibus shareholder accounts (comprised of a group of individual shareholders), each of which is affiliated with the Investment Adviser, and representing ownership in excess of 60% of the Fund.
8. Subsequent Events:
Management has evaluated events and transactions through the date the financial statements were available to be issued, for purposes of recognition or disclosure in these financial statements and there are no subsequent events to report.
44 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited)
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), generally requires that a majority of the trustees of a mutual fund who are not parties to an investment advisory agreement for the fund or “interested persons” of the fund, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”) review and approve the investment advisory agreement at an in person meeting for an initial period of up to two years and thereafter on an annual basis. A summary of the material factors considered by the Independent Trustees and the Boards of Trustees (the “Board”) of HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds), HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (each, a “Trust”) in connection with approving investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the series of the Trusts (each, a “Fund”) during the semi-annual period ended April 30, 2012 and the conclusions the Independent Trustees and Board made as a result of those considerations are set forth below.
I. Annual Continuation of Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements
The Board met in person on December 15-16, 2011 and the Contracts and Expense Committee thereof, which consists of the Independent Trustees of the Trusts (the “Contracts Committee”), met on November 29 and December 15, 2011 to consider, among other matters:
- the approval of the continuation of the: (i) Investment Advisory Contracts and related Supplements (“Advisory Contracts”) between the Trusts and HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”) and (ii) Sub-Advisory Agreements (“Sub-Advisory Contracts”) between the Adviser and each investment sub-adviser (“Sub-Adviser”) to one or more Funds; and
- the approval of the continuation of certain other ancillary agreements to which the Adviser is a party that obligate the Adviser to provide the Funds with administrative services, such as the Administration Agreement, Support Services Agreement and Operational Support Services Agreement (each, an “Ancillary Agreement”).
Prior to the meetings, the Independent Trustees received and reviewed the information they thought reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Advisory Contracts, Sub-Advisory Contracts and Ancillary Agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”). This information included, among other things, information about: (i) the services that the Adviser and Sub-Advisers provide; (ii) the personnel who provide such services; (iii) investment performance; (iv) trading practices of the Adviser and Sub-Advisers; (v) fees received or to be received by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, including in comparison with the advisory fees paid by other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vi) total expense ratios, including in comparison with the total expense ratios of other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vii) the profitability of the Adviser and certain of the Sub-Advisers; and (viii) compliance-related matters pertaining to the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. Counsel to the Trusts and to the Independent Trustees were present at each Contracts Committee meeting and the Board meeting. In this regard, counsel to the Independent Trustees advised the Independent Trustees with respect to their deliberations during the process and their fiduciary obligations under Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act.
On November 29, 2011, the Contracts Committee convened and its members reviewed the information provided in advance of the meeting and discussed, among other things: (i) the Administration Agreement; (ii) the Trusts’ arrangements with the Sub-Advisers and the Funds advised by the Sub-Advisers; (iii) the fees and performance record of the Funds that are money market funds (“Money Market Funds”); and (iv) compliance matters. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Committee requested certain additional information from the Adviser with respect to other accounts managed by the Adviser and pricing information regarding certain Funds, among other matters. The Contracts Committee also convened on December 15, 2011 to discuss, among other things: (i) the Adviser’s investment advisory arrangements with respect to the Aggressive Strategy Fund, Balanced Strategy Fund, Conservative Strategy Fund, and Moderate Strategy Fund (collectively, the “World Selection Funds”); (ii) the HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund (formerly, HSBC Investor U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund); (iii) certain subadvisory fee breakpoints; (iv) services provided to the Funds under the Ancillary Agreements; and (v) the Adviser’s response to the follow-up questions posed by the Contracts Committee following the November 29, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting. Following the December 15, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting, the members of the Contracts Committee determined to recommend to the Board, including the Independent Trustees, that the Agreements be continued for an additional one-year period.
At the in-person meeting held on December 15-16, 2011, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed the materials and other information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and considered the previous deliberations and recommendation of the Contracts Committee. As a result of this process, the Board and Independent Trustees determined to approve the continuation of the Agreements with respect to each Fund.
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 45
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited) (continued)
The Board and the Independent Trustees made these determinations on the basis of the following considerations, among others:
Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided by Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees examined the nature, quality and extent of the investment advisory and administrative support services provided by the Adviser to the Funds, as well as the quality and experience of the Adviser’s personnel. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Multimanager unit with respect to the World Selection Funds and the equity Funds, the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Emerging Markets Debt Team with respect to the emerging markets debt Funds, as well as the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s portfolio management and credit review teams with respect to the Money Market Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the nature, quality and extent of the administrative support services that the Adviser provides to the Funds, including the Adviser’s oversight and management of the Funds’ other service providers.
The Independent Trustees also took note of: (i) the long-term relationship between the Adviser and the Funds; (ii) the Adviser’s reputation and financial condition; (iii) the reduction during the period in the HSBC Family of Fund’s net assets; (iv) the liquidation of certain Funds; and (v) the efforts undertaken by the Adviser to foster the growth and development of the Funds since the inception of each of the Funds, including the recent development and launch of the HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund and HSBC Frontier Markets Fund. With respect to the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the financial support the Adviser and its affiliates have afforded the Money Market Funds, such as the fee waivers and reimbursements made to maintain a non-negative yield for the Money Market Funds more recently. In addition, the Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s performance in fulfilling its responsibilities for overseeing its own and the Sub-Advisers’ compliance with the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures and investment objectives.
The Independent Trustees also examined the nature, quality and extent of the services that the Sub-Advisers provide to their respective Funds. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the investment performance and the portfolio risk characteristics achieved by the Sub-Advisers and the Sub-Advisers’ portfolio management teams, their experience, and the quality of their compliance programs, among other factors.
Based on these considerations, the Independent Trustees concluded that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, and that the services provided supported continuance of the Agreements.
Investment Performance of the Funds, Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the investment performance of each Fund over various periods of time, as compared to one another as well as to comparable funds and one or more benchmark indices. In the context of the World Selection Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the relative underperformance of the World Selection Funds in light of data provided by Lipper Inc., and representations by the Adviser regarding market factors that contributed to the relative underperformance, as well as their investment outlook. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Growth Portfolio), the Independent Trustees favorably noted the consistent performance record of the Portfolio. In the context of the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the yield support that the Adviser had provided in order for the Money Market Funds to retain non-negative performance. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds’ investment performance and the Adviser’s actions to improve investment performance, where applicable, supported continuance of the Agreements.
Costs of Services and Profits Realized by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the costs of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and the expense ratios of the Funds more generally. The Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s profitability and costs, including by means of an analysis provided by the Adviser of its estimated profitability attributable to its relationship with the Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts and compared those fees to the fees of similar funds, which had been compiled and provided by Lipper Inc. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds had advisory fees competitive with those of similar funds, noting the resources, expertise and experience provided to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also compared the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts with those of other accounts managed by the Adviser, and evaluated information provided as to why advisory fees may differ between mutual funds and other advisory relationships, including increased shareholder activity. In this regard, the Independent Trustees concluded that differences in advisory fees assessed between the Funds and other accounts managed by the Adviser did not preclude approval of the Advisory Contracts.
46 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited) (continued)
With respect to the administrative support services provided by the Adviser, the Independent Trustees considered the fees charged for such services and evaluated the fees payable to the Adviser and those payable to other providers of administrative services to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also considered the costs of the services provided by the Sub-Advisers, as applicable; the relative portions of the total advisory fees paid to the Sub-Advisers and retained by the Adviser in its capacity as the Funds’ investment adviser; and the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio, the Independent Trustees considered the subadvisory fee breakpoint structure. The Independent Trustees also considered information on profitability where provided by the Sub-Advisers.
The Independent Trustees concluded that the advisory fees payable to the Adviser and the Funds’ Sub-Advisers were fair and reasonable in light of the factors set forth above.
Other Relevant Considerations. The Independent Trustees also considered the extent to which the Adviser and Sub-Advisers had achieved economies of scale, whether the Funds’ expense structure permits economies of scale to be shared with the Funds’ shareholders and, if so, the extent to which the Funds’ shareholders may benefit from these economies of scale. The Independent Trustees also noted the contractual caps on certain Fund expenses provided by the Adviser with respect to many of the Funds in order to reduce or control the overall operating expenses of those Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered certain information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers with respect to the benefits they may derive from their relationships with the Funds, including the fact that certain Sub-Advisers have “soft dollar” arrangements with respect to Fund brokerage and therefore may have access to research and other permissible services.
In light of the above considerations and such other factors and information it considered relevant, the Board by a unanimous vote of those present in person at the meeting (including a separate unanimous vote of the Independent Trustees present in person at the meeting) approved the continuation of each Agreement.
II. Approval of an Advisory Contract Supplement for the Income Strategy Fund
On December 15, 2011, the Contracts Committee met in person and on December 15-16, 2011, the Board met in person to consider the expansion of the HSBC Family of Funds to include a new series of HSBC Funds, the Income Strategy Fund (“Income Strategy Fund”) and, in connection therewith, approving:
- the Advisory Contract between the Adviser and the Trust with respect to the Income Strategy Fund and the related Contract Supplement applicable to the Income Strategy Fund (“IS Advisory Agreement”); and
- the Trust’s Ancillary Agreements applicable to the Income Strategy Fund.
Prior to the meetings, the Independent Trustees received and reviewed the information they thought reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the IS Advisory Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements applicable to the Income Strategy Fund (collectively, the “IS Agreements”). This information included, among other things, information about: (i) the services the Adviser would provide to the Income Strategy Fund; (ii) personnel who provide such services; (iii) the investment management capabilities of the Adviser; and (iv) fees proposed to be received by the Adviser with respect to the Income Strategy Fund in comparison with other similar funds, based on materials provided by the Adviser from a database compiled by Lipper Inc. Counsel to the Trust and to the Independent Trustees were present at the Contracts Committee meeting and the Board meeting. In this regard, counsel to the Independent Trustees advised the Independent Trustees with respect to their deliberations during the process and their fiduciary obligations under Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act.
At its meeting, the Contracts Committee reviewed and discussed the information provided in advance of the meeting and received a presentation about the Adviser. Based on its deliberations, the Committee determined to recommend to the Board, including the Independent Trustees, that the IS Agreements be approved with respect to the Income Strategy Fund. At the meeting of the Board, the Independent Trustees considered the recommendation of the Contracts Committee and further evaluated the proposal. As a result of this process, the Board and Independent Trustees determined to approve the IS Agreements with respect to the Income Strategy Fund.
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 47
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited) (continued)
The Board and the Independent Trustees made these determinations on the basis of the following considerations, among others:
Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided by the Adviser. The Independent Trustees examined the nature, quality and extent of the investment advisory services proposed to be provided by the Adviser with respect to the Income Strategy Fund, as well as the quality and experience of the Adviser’s personnel. The Independent Trustees also considered that certain of the services provided by the Adviser would be consistent with those provided to other Funds, and therefore considered the same points as they did in considering the annual renewal of the Advisory Contracts and Ancillary Agreements in December 2011 as set forth above. In addition, the Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s experience in managing the other World Selection Funds, and that the Income Strategy Fund would resemble those World Selection Funds, although it would have a different asset allocation.
Based upon these considerations, the Independent Trustees concluded that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of the services proposed to be provided by the Adviser with respect to the Income Strategy Fund and that the services proposed to be provided supported the approval of the IS Advisory Agreement.
Investment Performance of the Adviser. The Independent Trustees considered that although the Income Strategy Fund would be similar to the existing World Selection Funds, it would have a different asset allocation, and that the Adviser did not manage another fund with a similar asset allocation. The Independent Trustees also considered information the Adviser provided about the Adviser’s investment management capabilities, including the services the Adviser has provided to the existing World Selection Funds. Based on these considerations, and the level of the Adviser’s expertise with the existing World Selection Funds, the Independent Trustees determined that the lack of directly relevant prior experience in managing a fund with a similar asset allocation did not preclude initial approval of the IS Advisory Agreement
Costs of Proposed Services and Profits to be Realized by the Adviser. The Independent Trustees considered the costs of the proposed services to be provided by the Adviser to the Income Strategy Fund. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered information pertaining to the proposed advisory fees and the projected total expense ratios for the Income Strategy Fund as compared to other similar funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the profitability information regarding the Adviser more generally that the Adviser has provided to the Independent Trustees in connection with the annual renewal of the 15(c) process. The Independent Trustees concluded that the advisory fees proposed to be payable to the Adviser are fair and reasonable in light of the factors set forth above.
Other Relevant Considerations. The Independent Trustees also considered the extent to which the Income Strategy Fund’s proposed expense structure may permit economies of scale to be shared with the Fund’s shareholders and, if so, the extent to which the Income Strategy Fund’s shareholders may benefit from these potential economies of scale. The Independent Trustees also noted the proposed contractual caps on certain Fund expenses proposed to be provided by the Adviser with respect to the Income Strategy Fund in order to reduce or control the overall operating expenses of the Fund.
Accordingly, in light of the above considerations and such other factors and information it considered relevant, the Board of Trustees by a unanimous vote of those present in person at the meeting (including a separate unanimous vote of the Independent Trustees present in person at the meeting) approved the IS Agreements.
48 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
Table of Shareholder Expenses—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the World Selection Funds, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases, redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and/or shareholder servicing fees and other Fund expenses (including expenses allocated from the Portfolios). These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the World Selection Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012.
Actual Example
The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
Aggressive Strategy Fund | | Class A Shares | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | | $ | 1,078.00 | | | | $ | 7.75 | | | 1.50% |
| | Class B Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,073.00 | | | | | 11.60 | | | 2.25% |
| | Class C Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,072.70 | | | | | 11.60 | | | 2.25% |
Balanced Strategy Fund | | Class A Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,067.10 | | | | | 6.01 | | | 1.17% |
| | Class B Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,063.00 | | | | | 9.85 | | | 1.92% |
| | Class C Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,064.00 | | | | | 9.85 | | | 1.92% |
Moderate Strategy Fund | | Class A Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,058.10 | | | | | 5.83 | | | 1.14% |
| | Class B Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,053.40 | | | | | 9.65 | | | 1.89% |
| | Class C Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,054.00 | | | | | 9.65 | | | 1.89% |
Conservative Strategy Fund | | Class A Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,048.90 | | | | | 6.57 | | | 1.29% |
| | Class B Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,044.80 | | | | | 10.37 | | | 2.04% |
| | Class C Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,045.10 | | | | | 10.37 | | | 2.04% |
Income Strategy Fund** | | Class A Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,012.70 | | | | | 1.73 | | | 1.50% |
| | Class B Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,011.20 | | | | | 2.60 | | | 2.25% |
| | Class C Shares | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,011.20 | | | | | 2.60 | | | 2.25% |
____________________
* | | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
** | | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the period from March 20, 2012 (date of commencement of operations) to April 30, 2012 divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS 49
HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS |
|
Table of Shareholder Expenses—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued) |
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees, or exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
Aggressive Strategy Fund | | Class A Shares | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,017.40 | | | $ | 7.52 | | | | 1.50% | |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,013.67 | | | | 11.27 | | | | 2.25% | |
| | Class C Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,013.67 | | | | 11.27 | | | | 2.25% | |
Balanced Strategy Fund | | Class A Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,019.19 | | | | 5.87 | | | | 1.17% | |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,015.32 | | | | 9.62 | | | | 1.92% | |
| | Class C Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,015.32 | | | | 9.62 | | | | 1.92% | |
Moderate Strategy Fund | | Class A Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,019.19 | | | | 5.72 | | | | 1.14% | |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,015.47 | | | | 9.47 | | | | 1.89% | |
| | Class C Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,015.47 | | | | 9.47 | | | | 1.89% | |
Conservative Strategy Fund | | Class A Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,018.45 | | | | 6.47 | | | | 1.29% | |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,014.72 | | | | 10.22 | | | | 2.04% | |
| | Class C Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,014.72 | | | | 10.22 | | | | 2.04% | |
Income Strategy Fund** | | Class A Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,017.40 | | | | 7.52 | | | | 1.50% | |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,013.67 | | | | 11.27 | | | | 2.25% | |
| | Class C Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,013.67 | | | | 11.27 | | | | 2.25% | |
____________________
* | | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
** | | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). Information shown reflects values using the expense ratios for the 42 days of operations during the period, and has been annualized to reflect values for the period November 1, 2011 to April 30, 2012. |
50 HSBC WORLD SELECTION FUNDS
HSBC GROWTH PORTFOLIO |
|
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks – 97.1% | | | |
| Shares | | Value ($) |
Aerospace & Defense – 2.8% | | | |
Precision Castparts Corp. | 5,700 | | 1,005,309 |
United Technologies Corp. | 19,300 | | 1,575,652 |
| | | 2,580,961 |
|
Auto Components – 1.2% | | | |
BorgWarner, Inc.(a) | 14,700 | | 1,161,888 |
|
Biotechnology – 2.6% | | | |
Biogen Idec, Inc.(a) | 10,300 | | 1,380,303 |
Celgene Corp.(a) | 14,900 | | 1,086,508 |
| | | 2,466,811 |
|
Capital Markets – 3.3% | | | |
Franklin Resources, Inc. | 11,500 | | 1,443,365 |
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. | 38,900 | | 730,931 |
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 7,900 | | 909,685 |
| | | 3,083,981 |
|
Chemicals – 3.3% | | | |
Ecolab, Inc. | 20,100 | | 1,280,169 |
Monsanto Co. | 23,700 | | 1,805,466 |
| | | 3,085,635 |
|
Communications Equipment – 3.4% | | | |
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 49,700 | | 3,172,848 |
| | | |
Computers & Peripherals – 9.7% | | | |
Apple, Inc.(a) | 9,450 | | 5,521,068 |
EMC Corp.(a) | 90,600 | | 2,555,826 |
NetApp, Inc.(a) | 25,500 | | 990,165 |
| | | 9,067,059 |
|
Construction & Engineering – 1.3% | | | |
Fluor Corp. | 21,400 | | 1,235,850 |
| | | |
Diversified Financial Services – 2.8% | | | |
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.(a) | 7,600 | | 1,011,104 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 36,500 | | 1,568,770 |
| | | 2,579,874 |
|
Energy Equipment & Services – 2.6% | | | |
Cameron International Corp.(a) | 17,400 | | 891,750 |
FMC Technologies, Inc.(a) | 32,700 | | 1,536,900 |
| | | 2,428,650 |
|
Food & Staples Retailing – 2.4% | | | |
Costco Wholesale Corp. | 11,400 | | 1,005,138 |
CVS Caremark Corp. | 27,000 | | 1,204,740 |
| | | 2,209,878 |
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 2.3% | | | |
Edwards Lifesciences Corp.(a) | 11,000 | | 912,670 |
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.(a) | 1,755 | | 1,014,741 |
Varian Medical Systems, Inc.(a) | 3,500 | | 221,970 |
| | | 2,149,381 |
|
Health Care Providers & Services – 4.6% | | | |
Express Scripts Holding Co.(a) | 27,750 | | 1,548,172 |
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 48,400 | | 2,717,660 |
| | | 4,265,832 |
|
Health Care Technology – 0.7% | | | |
Cerner Corp.(a) | 8,100 | | 656,829 |
| | | |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 4.7% | | | |
Las Vegas Sands Corp. | 34,700 | | 1,925,503 |
Starbucks Corp. | 26,300 | | 1,509,094 |
Yum! Brands, Inc. | 13,200 | | 960,036 |
| | | 4,394,633 |
|
Internet & Catalog Retail – 4.9% | | | |
Amazon.com, Inc.(a) | 7,650 | | 1,774,035 |
Priceline.com, Inc.(a) | 3,685 | | 2,803,622 |
| | | 4,577,657 |
|
Internet Software & Services – 7.0% | | | |
Baidu, Inc. ADR(a) | 12,725 | | 1,688,608 |
eBay, Inc.(a) | 23,100 | | 948,255 |
Google, Inc., Class A(a) | 3,610 | | 2,184,880 |
LinkedIn Corp., Class A(a) | 7,400 | | 802,530 |
VeriSign, Inc. | 22,600 | | 929,086 |
| | | 6,553,359 |
|
IT Services – 6.5% | | | |
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.(a) | 32,100 | | 2,353,572 |
Teradata Corp.(a) | 5,200 | | 362,856 |
Visa, Inc., Class A | 26,900 | | 3,308,162 |
| | | 6,024,590 |
|
Machinery – 5.5% | | | |
Caterpillar, Inc. | 13,400 | | 1,377,118 |
Danaher Corp. | 51,200 | | 2,776,064 |
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 17,100 | | 981,198 |
| | | 5,134,380 |
|
Media – 0.5% | | | |
CBS Corp., Class B | 13,700 | | 456,895 |
|
Metals & Mining – 0.4% | | | |
Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. | 6,400 | | 398,464 |
| | | |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 3.5% | | | |
Concho Resources, Inc.(a) | 16,200 | | 1,736,316 |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 16,500 | | 1,505,130 |
| | | 3,241,446 |
|
Personal Products – 0.8% | | | |
The Estee Lauder Cos., Inc., Class A | 11,800 | | 771,130 |
|
Pharmaceuticals – 1.7% | | | |
Perrigo Co. | 5,700 | | 597,930 |
Shire plc ADR | 10,600 | | 1,034,136 |
| | | 1,632,066 |
52 HSBC PORTFOLIOS | | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC GROWTH PORTFOLIO |
|
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued) |
Common Stocks, continued | | | |
| Shares | | Value ($) |
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) – 1.7% | | | |
American Tower Corp. | 23,700 | | 1,554,246 |
| | | |
Road & Rail – 3.4% | | | |
Union Pacific Corp. | 28,200 | | 3,170,808 |
| | |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 0.7% | | |
Altera Corp. | 17,600 | | 626,032 |
|
Software – 7.3% | | | |
Autodesk, Inc.(a) | 22,900 | | 901,573 |
Intuit, Inc. | 15,600 | | 904,332 |
Microsoft Corp. | 40,400 | | 1,293,608 |
Oracle Corp. | 62,300 | | 1,830,997 |
Salesforce.com, Inc.(a) | 11,900 | | 1,853,187 |
| | | 6,783,697 |
|
Specialty Retail – 1.5% | | | |
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.(a) | 8,100 | | 854,226 |
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. | 6,600 | | 581,988 |
| | | 1,436,214 |
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 4.0% | | | |
Coach, Inc. | 12,600 | | 921,816 |
Fossil, Inc.(a) | 6,300 | | 823,221 |
Michael Kors Holdings Ltd.(a) | 10,100 | | 461,267 |
Ralph Lauren Corp. | 8,600 | | 1,481,522 |
| | | 3,687,826 |
| | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | | | |
(COST $69,073,618) | | | 90,588,920 |
| | | |
Investment Company – 2.6% | | | |
Northern Institutional Diversified Assets | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01%(b) | 2,440,887 | | 2,440,887 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT COMPANY | | | |
(COST $2,440,887) | | | 2,440,887 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | | |
(COST $71,514,505) — 99.7% | | | 93,029,807 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $93,344,762.
(a) | Represents non-income producing security. |
(b) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
ADR American Depositary Receipt
See notes to financial statements. | | HSBC PORTFOLIOS 53 |
HSBC OPPORTUNITY PORTFOLIO |
|
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks – 95.9% | | | |
| Shares | | Value ($) |
Aerospace & Defense – 4.3% | | | |
BE Aerospace, Inc.(a) | 75,390 | | 3,545,592 |
TransDigm Group, Inc.(a) | 25,100 | | 3,165,612 |
| | | 6,711,204 |
|
Capital Markets – 2.9% | | | |
Lazard Ltd., Class A | 79,490 | | 2,186,770 |
Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 61,210 | | 2,241,510 |
| | | 4,428,280 |
|
Chemicals – 3.5% | | | |
Celanese Corp., Series A | 57,240 | | 2,773,850 |
Westlake Chemical Corp. | 41,865 | | 2,677,267 |
| | | 5,451,117 |
|
Commercial Banks – 3.1% | | | |
Comerica, Inc. | 91,130 | | 2,917,982 |
First Horizon National Corp. | 1 | | 9 |
First Republic Bank(a) | 57,320 | | 1,893,280 |
| | | 4,811,271 |
|
Commercial Services & Supplies – 1.8% | | | |
Waste Connections, Inc. | 84,185 | | 2,713,283 |
|
Communications Equipment – 1.6% | | | |
Comverse Technology, Inc.(a) | 578 | | 3,728 |
JDS Uniphase Corp.(a) | 135,260 | | 1,643,409 |
Polycom, Inc.(a) | 61,300 | | 813,451 |
| | | 2,460,588 |
|
Containers & Packaging – 3.7% | | | |
Crown Holdings, Inc.(a) | 78,370 | | 2,898,122 |
Packaging Corp. of America | 98,040 | | 2,861,788 |
| | | 5,759,910 |
|
Diversified Financial Services – 1.2% | | | |
MSCI, Inc., Class A(a) | 51,750 | | 1,893,533 |
|
Electrical Equipment – 2.7% | | | |
Hubbell, Inc., Class B | 51,990 | | 4,171,678 |
|
Energy Equipment & Services – 3.1% | | | |
Ensco International plc ADR | 35,970 | | 1,965,760 |
Rowan Cos., Inc.(a) | 80,490 | | 2,779,320 |
| | | 4,745,080 |
|
Food Products – 2.7% | | | |
Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.(a) | 56,440 | | 4,109,396 |
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 4.6% | | | |
DENTSPLY International, Inc. | 99,810 | | 4,098,198 |
Hologic, Inc.(a) | 79,410 | | 1,518,319 |
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.(a) | 17,720 | | 1,558,120 |
| | | 7,174,637 |
|
Health Care Providers & Services – 2.2% | | | |
Coventry Health Care, Inc. | 112,530 | | 3,374,775 |
|
Insurance – 2.0% | | | |
Everest Re Group Ltd. | 30,710 | | 3,043,361 |
| | | |
IT Services – 5.2% | | | |
Alliance Data Systems Corp.(a) | 32,520 | | 4,178,495 |
FleetCor Technologies, Inc.(a) | 64,480 | | 2,550,184 |
Syntel, Inc. | 23,140 | | 1,385,854 |
| | | 8,114,533 |
|
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 2.0% | | | |
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc. (a) | 17,340 | | 3,109,409 |
|
Machinery – 7.4% | | | |
Crane Co. | 58,494 | | 2,581,340 |
Gardner Denver, Inc. | 41,640 | | 2,712,430 |
IDEX Corp. | 61,070 | | 2,644,942 |
The Timken Co. | 61,300 | | 3,464,063 |
| | | 11,402,775 |
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 5.3% | | | |
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.(a) | 84,962 | | 1,370,437 |
Denbury Resources, Inc.(a) | 157,120 | | 2,991,565 |
Tesoro Corp.(a) | 168,890 | | 3,926,692 |
| | | 8,288,694 |
|
Personal Products – 1.1% | | | |
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc., Class A | 33,440 | | 1,782,352 |
|
Pharmaceuticals – 2.3% | | | |
Elan Corp. plc ADR(a) | 253,850 | | 3,500,591 |
|
Professional Services – 2.0% | | | |
IHS, Inc., Class A(a) | 30,350 | | 3,067,475 |
|
Real Estate Management & Development – 1.7% | | |
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. | 33,830 | | 2,704,370 |
|
Road & Rail – 5.6% | | | |
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.(a) | 202,820 | | 3,125,456 |
Landstar System, Inc. | 56,570 | | 3,030,455 |
Ryder System, Inc. | 50,360 | | 2,453,539 |
| | | 8,609,450 |
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 4.6% | | |
NXP Semiconductors NV(a) | 62,290 | | 1,610,197 |
ON Semiconductor Corp.(a) | 166,290 | | 1,373,555 |
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.(a) | 78,830 | | 2,139,446 |
Teradyne, Inc.(a) | 115,480 | | 1,987,411 |
| | | 7,110,609 |
|
Software – 3.5% | | | |
Informatica Corp. (a) | 69,850 | | 3,214,497 |
Nuance Communications, Inc.(a) | 91,700 | | 2,241,148 |
| | | 5,455,645 |
|
Specialty Retail – 11.4% | | | |
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | 157,960 | | 2,844,859 |
Foot Locker, Inc. | 159,820 | | 4,888,894 |
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.(a) | 35,050 | | 3,696,373 |
Signet Jewelers Ltd. | 65,940 | | 3,215,894 |
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 76,020 | | 2,941,214 |
| | | 17,587,234 |
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 0.4% | | | |
Michael Kors Holdings Ltd.(a) | 15,130 | | 690,987 |
54 HSBC PORTFOLIOS | | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC OPPORTUNITY PORTFOLIO |
|
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued) |
Common Stocks, continued | | | |
| Shares | | Value ($) |
Trading Companies & Distributors – 3.7% | | | |
United Rentals, Inc.(a) | 66,640 | | 3,110,755 |
WESCO International, Inc.(a) | 39,430 | | 2,617,758 |
| | | 5,728,513 |
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 0.3% | | | |
NII Holdings, Inc.(a) | 33,420 | | 467,713 |
| | | |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | | | |
(COST $123,944,145) | | | 148,468,463 |
|
Investment Company – 4.0% | | | |
Northern Institutional Government Select | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01%(b) | 6,231,280 | | 6,231,280 |
TOTAL INVESTMENT COMPANY | | | |
(COST $6,231,280) | | | 6,231,280 |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS SECURITIES | | | |
(COST $130,175,425) — 99.9% | | | 154,699,743 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $154,887,989.
(a) | Represents non-income producing security. |
(b) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
ADR American Depositary Receipt
See notes to financial statements. | | HSBC PORTFOLIOS 55 |
HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| Growth | | Opportunity |
| Portfolio | | Portfolio |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in non-affiliates, at value | | $ | 93,029,807 | | | | $ | 154,699,743 | |
Dividends receivable | | | 33,302 | | | | | 28,118 | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 1,121,664 | | | | | 2,205,972 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 155 | | | | | 236 | |
Total Assets | | | 94,184,928 | | | | | 156,934,069 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | 776,258 | | | | | 1,934,711 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | 50,282 | | | | | 100,860 | |
Administration | | | 2,558 | | | | | 4,206 | |
Custodian | | | 60 | | | | | 101 | |
Trustee | | | 149 | | | | | 78 | |
Other | | | 10,859 | | | | | 6,124 | |
Total Liabilities | | | 840,166 | | | | | 2,046,080 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Applicable to investors’ beneficial interest | | $ | 93,344,762 | | | | $ | 154,887,989 | |
Total Investments, at cost | | $ | 71,514,505 | | | | $ | 130,175,425 | |
56 HSBC PORTFOLIOS | | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Statements of Operations—For the six months ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| Growth | | Opportunity |
| Portfolio | | Portfolio |
Investment Income: | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | $ | 420,021 | | | | $ | 493,142 | | |
Total Investment Income | | | 420,021 | | | | | 493,142 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | 270,926 | | | | | 592,358 | | |
Administration | | | 14,011 | | | | | 22,186 | | |
Accounting | | | 22,145 | | | | | 22,058 | | |
Compliance Service | | | 415 | | | | | 614 | | |
Custodian | | | 8,162 | | | | | 12,819 | | |
Printing | | | 1,307 | | | | | 1,909 | | |
Professional | | | 5,306 | | | | | 7,485 | | |
Trustee | | | 1,353 | | | | | 1,975 | | |
Other | | | 4,022 | | | | | 5,383 | | |
Total Expenses | | | 327,647 | | | | | 666,787 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income (Loss) | | | 92,374 | | | | | (173,645 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Investments: | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investment securities | | | 8,967,627 | | | | | 7,366,429 | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | 1,676,015 | | | | | 11,628,065 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized/unrealized gains from investments | | | 10,643,642 | | | | | 18,994,494 | | |
Change In Net Assets Resulting From Operations | | $ | 10,736,016 | | | | $ | 18,820,849 | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | HSBC PORTFOLIOS 57 |
HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| Growth | | Opportunity |
| Portfolio | | Portfolio |
| For the | | | For the | | | For the | | | For the | |
| six months ended | | | year ended | | | six months ended | | | year ended | |
| April 30, 2012 | | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | | October 31, 2011 |
| (Unaudited) | | | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | | |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | $ | 92,374 | | | | | $ | 69,416 | | | | | $ | (173,645 | ) | | | | $ | 79,759 | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | 8,967,627 | | | | | | 10,568,671 | | | | | | 7,366,429 | | | | | | 24,005,437 | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
from investments | | | 1,676,015 | | | | | | 387,197 | | | | | | 11,628,065 | | | | | | (5,303,339 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | 10,736,016 | | | | | | 11,025,284 | | | | | | 18,820,849 | | | | | | 18,781,857 | | |
Proceeds from contributions | | | 6,039,296 | | | | | | 20,411,483 | | | | | | 11,789,218 | | | | | | 16,493,895 | | |
Value of withdrawals | | | (28,719,437 | ) | | | | | (24,898,681 | ) | | | | | (17,046,480 | ) | | | | | (33,352,902 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from transactions from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
investors’ beneficial interest | | | (22,680,141 | ) | | | | | (4,487,198 | ) | | | | | (5,257,262 | ) | | | | | (16,859,007 | ) | |
Change in net assets | | | (11,944,125 | ) | | | | | 6,538,086 | | | | | | 13,563,587 | | | | | | 1,922,850 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 105,288,887 | | | | | | 98,750,801 | | | | | | 141,324,402 | | | | | | 139,401,552 | | |
End of period | | $ | 93,344,762 | | | | | $ | 105,288,887 | | | | | $ | 154,887,989 | | | | | $ | 141,324,402 | | |
58 | HSBC PORTFOLIOS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC PORTFOLIO |
|
Financial Highlights |
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | | | Ratio/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios of | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Expenses | | | |
| | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Investment | | to Average | | | |
| | | | Net Assets at | | Expenses to | | Income (Loss) | | Net Assets | | | |
| Total | | End of Period | | Average Net | | to Average Net | | (Excluding Fee | | Portfolio |
| Return(a) | | (000’s) | | Assets(b) | | Assets(b) | | Reductions)(b) | | Turnover(a) |
GROWTH PORTFOLIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | 31.11 | % | | $ | 89,686 | | | 0.62% | | 0.45 | % | | 0.62% | | 57 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | (37.75 | )%(c) | | | 81,942 | | | 0.62% | | 0.19 | % | | 0.62% | | 158 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | 19.31 | % | | | 88,163 | | | 0.69% | | 0.17 | % | | 0.69% | | 66 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | 20.34 | % | | | 98,751 | | | 0.68% | | (0.04 | )% | | 0.68% | | 89 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | 11.07 | % | | | 105,289 | | | 0.66% | | 0.07 | % | | 0.66% | | 56 | % |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | 12.80 | % | | | 93,345 | | | 0.70% | | 0.20 | % | | 0.70% | | 20 | % |
OPPORTUNITY PORTFOLIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | 30.54 | % | | $ | 224,268 | | | 0.91% | | (0.55 | )% | | 0.91% | | 69 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | (35.30 | )% | | | 127,970 | | | 0.87% | | (0.46 | )% | | 0.87% | | 80 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | 15.41 | % | | | 129,748 | | | 0.90% | | (0.37 | )% | | 0.90% | | 65 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | 28.74 | % | | | 139,402 | | | 0.89% | | (0.35 | )% | | 0.89% | | 68 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | 12.40 | % | | | 141,324 | | | 0.88% | | 0.05 | % | | 0.88% | | 69 | % |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | 13.71 | % | | | 154,888 | | | 0.90% | | (0.23 | )% | | 0.90% | | 32 | % |
(a) | Not annualized for period less than one year. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | During the year ended October 31, 2008, Winslow Capital Management, Inc. reimbursed $64,658 to the Growth Portfolio related to violations of certain investment policies and limitations. The corresponding impact to total return was 0.08%. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC PORTFOLIOS 59 |
HSBC PORTFOLIOS |
|
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) |
1. Organization:
The HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (the “Portfolio Trust’’), is an open-end management investment company organized as a New York trust under the laws of the State of New York on November 1, 1994. The Portfolio Trust contains the following master funds (individually a “Portfolio,’’ collectively the “Portfolios’’):
| Portfolio | | | Short Name | | |
| HSBC Growth Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Growth Portfolio) | | Growth Portfolio | |
| | | | |
| HSBC Opportunity Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Opportunity Portfolio) | | Opportunity Portfolio | |
The Portfolios operate as master funds in master-feeder arrangements, in which other funds invest all or part of their investable assets in the Portfolios. The Portfolios also receive investments from funds of funds. The Declaration of Trust permits the Board of Trustees (the “Board’’) to issue an unlimited number of beneficial interests in the Portfolios.
The Portfolios are diversified series of the Portfolio Trust and are part of the HSBC Family of Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Family of Funds), which also includes HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds) collectively (the “Trusts’’). Financial statements for all other funds of the Trusts are published separately.
Under the Portfolio Trust’s organizational documents, the Portfolio Trust’s officers and Trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolios. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio Trust may enter into contracts with its service providers, which also provide for indemnifications by the Portfolios. The Portfolios’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve any future claims that may be made against the Portfolios. However, based on experience, the Portfolio Trust expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies:
The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Portfolios in the preparation of their financial statements. The policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP’’). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities Valuation:
The Portfolios record their investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 3 below.
Investment Transactions and Related Income:
Investment transactions are accounted for not later than on business day after trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Investment gains and losses are calculated on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization or accretion of premium or discount. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Expense Allocations:
Expenses directly attributable to a Portfolio are charged to that Portfolio. Expenses not directly attributable to a Portfolio are allocated proportionally among the applicable portfolios or funds within the HSBC Family of Funds in relation to net assets or on another reasonable basis.
60 HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Federal Income Taxes:
Each Portfolio will be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, each Portfolio passes through all of its net investment income and gains and losses to its feeder funds, and is therefore not subject to U.S. federal income tax. As such, investors in the Portfolios will be taxed on their respective share of the Portfolios’ ordinary income and realized gains. It is intended that the Portfolios will be managed in such a way that an investor will be able to satisfy the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies.
Management of the Portfolios has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
3. Investment Valuation Summary:
The valuation techniques employed by the Portfolios, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Portfolios’ investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
- Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
- Level 2: other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
- Level 3: significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Exchange traded, domestic equity securities are valued at the last sale price on a national securities exchange, or in the absence of recorded sales, at the readily available closing bid price on such exchanges, or at the quoted bid price in the over-the-counter market and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Shares of exchange traded and closed-end registered investment companies are valued in the same manner as other equity securities and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Mutual funds are valued at their net asset values, as reported by such companies and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Repurchase agreements are valued at original cost and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Securities or other assets for which market quotations are not readily available, or are deemed unreliable due to a significant event, are valued pursuant to procedures adopted by the Trusts’ Board (“Procedures”). Depending on the source and relative significance of valuation inputs, these instruments may be classified as Level 2 or Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Examples of potentially significant events that could affect the value of an individual security and thus require pricing under the procedures include corporate actions by the issuer, announcements by the issuer relating to its earnings or products, regulatory news, natural disasters, and litigation. Examples of potentially significant events that could affect multiple securities held by a Portfolio include governmental actions, natural disasters, and armed conflicts.
For the period ended April 30, 2012, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
HSBC PORTFOLIOS 61
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of April 30, 2012 in valuing the Portfolios’ investments based upon three levels defined above:
| | | LEVEL 1 ($) | | LEVEL 2 ($) | | LEVEL 3 ($) | | Total ($) |
| Growth Portfolio | | | | | | | | |
| Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | |
| Common Stocks (a) | | 90,588,920 | | — | | — | | 90,588,920 |
| Investment Company | | 2,440,887 | | — | | — | | 2,440,887 |
| Total Investment Securities | | 93,029,807 | | — | | — | | 93,029,807 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Opportunity Portfolio | | | | | | | | |
| Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | |
| Common Stocks (a) | | 148,468,463 | | — | | — | | 148,468,463 |
| Investment Company | | 6,231,280 | | — | | — | | 6,231,280 |
| Total Investment Securities | | 154,699,743 | | — | | — | | 154,699,743 |
| ____________________ | | | | | | | | |
| (a) For detailed investment categorizations, see the accompanying Schedules of Portfolio Investments. |
The Portfolio Trust recognizes significant transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. There were no significant transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 as of April 30, 2012 from the valuation input levels used on October 31, 2011.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04 (“ASU 2011-04”), “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS”. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 will have no effect on each Portfolio’s net assets. At this time, management is evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2011-04 on the financial statement disclosures.
4. Related Party Transactions and Other Agreements:
Investment Management:
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (“HSBC’’ or the “Investment Adviser’’), a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC Bank USA, N.A., a national bank organized under the laws of the United States, acts as the Investment Adviser to the Portfolios pursuant to an investment management contract with the Portfolio Trust. As Investment Adviser, HSBC manages the investments of the Portfolios and continuously reviews, supervises, and administers the Portfolios’ investments. Winslow Capital Management, Inc. (“Winslow’’) and Westfield Capital Management Company, L.P. (“Westfield’’) serve as subadvisers for the Growth Portfolio and Opportunity Portfolio, and are paid for their services directly by the respective Portfolios.
For their services, the Investment Adviser and Winslow receive in aggregate, from the Growth Portfolio, a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of:
| Based on Average Daily Net Assets of all Sub-Adviser serviced funds and separate accounts affiliated with HSBC: | | | Fee Rate(%)* |
| Up to $250 million | | 0.575 |
| In excess of $250 million but not exceeding $500 million | | 0.525 |
| In excess of $500 million but not exceeding $750 million | | 0.475 |
| In excess of $750 million but not exceeding $1 billion | | 0.425 |
| In excess of $1 billion | | 0.375 |
| ____________________ |
| * | The Growth Portfolio may pay the Investment Adviser and Winslow an aggregate maximum fee of up to 0.68%. Currently, the Investment Adviser’s contractual fee is 0.175% and Winslow’s maximum contractual fee is 0.40%. Accordingly, the current aggregate maximum fee rate is 0.575%. |
62 HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
For their services, the Investment Adviser and Westfield receive in aggregate, a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of 0.80% of the Opportunity Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Any voluntary fee waivers/reimbursements are not subject to recoupment in subsequent fiscal periods. Voluntary waiver/reimbursements may be stopped at any time.
Administration:
HSBC serves the Trusts as Administrator. Under the terms of the Administration Agreement, HSBC receives from the Trusts a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of:
| Based on Average Daily Net Assets of | | | Fee Rate(%) |
| Up to $10 billion | | 0.0550 |
| In excess of $10 billion but not exceeding $20 billion | | 0.0350 |
| In excess of $20 billion but not exceeding $50 billion | | 0.0275 |
| In excess of $50 billion | | 0.0250 |
The fee rates and breakpoints are determined on the basis of the aggregate average daily net assets of the Trusts, however, the assets of the Portfolios and HSBC Funds and HSBC Advisor Fund that invest in the Portfolios are not double-counted. The total administration fee paid to HSBC is allocated to each series based upon its proportionate share of the aggregate net assets of the Trusts. For assets invested in the Portfolios by the HSBC Funds and HSBC Advisor Fund, the Portfolios pay half of the administration fee and the other funds pay half of the administration fee, for a combination of the total fee rate set forth above.
Pursuant to a Sub-Administration Agreement with HSBC, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., serves as the Trusts’ Sub-Administrator subject to the general supervision by the Trusts’ Board and HSBC. For these services, Citi is entitled to a fee, payable by HSBC, at an annual rate equivalent to the fee rates set forth above subject to certain reductions associated with services provided to new portfolios, minus 0.02% which is retained by HSBC.
Under a Compliance Services Agreement between the Trusts and Citi (the “CCO Agreement’’), Citi makes an employee available to serve as the Trusts’ Chief Compliance Officer (the “CCO’’). Under the CCO Agreement, Citi also provides infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Trusts’ compliance program, including support services to the CCO. For the services provided under the CCO Agreement, the Trusts paid Citi $140,088 for the period ended April 30, 2012, plus reimbursement of certain expenses. Expenses incurred by each Portfolio are reflected on the Statements of Operations as “Compliance Services.’’ Citi pays the salary and other compensation earned by individuals as employees of Citi.
Fund Accounting:
Citi provides fund accounting services for the Portfolio Trust. For its services to the Portfolios, Citi receives an annual fee per portfolio, including reimbursement of certain expenses, that is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Independent Trustees:
Prior to January 1, 2012, the Trusts, in the aggregate, paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $63,000, a fee of $5,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended, a fee of $3,000 for each special telephonic meeting attended, and a fee of $5,000 for each special in-person meeting attended. The Trusts also paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $3,000 for each Committee on which such Trustee served as a Committee member as well as a fee of $3,000 for each Committee meeting attended. Additionally, the Trusts paid each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $6,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit Committee, who received a retainer of $8,000. The Trusts also paid Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $20,000, as well as an additional $4,000 for each regular meeting of the Board attended. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee was compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
Effective January 1, 2012, the Trusts pay each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $100,000. The Trusts pay a fee of $10,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended and a fee of $3,000 for each special meeting attended. The Trusts pay each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $3,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit
HSBC PORTFOLIOS 63
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Committee, who receives a retainer of $6,000. The Trusts also pay Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $24,000. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee is compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
5. Investment Transactions:
Cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) for the period ended April 30, 2012 were as follows:
| Portfolio Name | | | Purchases | | Sales |
| Growth Portfolio | | $ | 18,837,965 | | $ | 40,532,187 |
| Opportunity Portfolio | | | 46,007,974 | | | 51,825,486 |
For the period ended April 30, 2012, there were no long-term U.S. government securities held by the Portfolio Trust.
6. Federal Income Tax Information:
At April 30, 2012, the cost basis of securities for federal income tax purposes, gross unrealized appreciation, gross unrealized depreciation and net unrealized appreciation/depreciation were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | Net Unrealized |
| | | | | Tax Unrealized | | Tax Unrealized | | Appreciation/ |
| Fund | | | Tax Cost($) | | Appreciation($) | | Depreciation($) | | (Depreciation)($)* |
| Growth Portfolio | | 68,243,244 | | 25,426,536 | | | (639,973) | | | 24,786,563 |
| Opportunity Portfolio | | 132,084,921 | | 29,229,252 | | | (6,614,430) | | | 22,614,822 |
| ____________________ | | | | | | | | | | |
| * The difference between book-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
7. Subsequent Events:
Management has evaluated events and transactions through the date the financial statements were available to be issued, for purposes of recognition or disclosure in these financial statements and there are no subsequent events to report.
64 HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited)
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), generally requires that a majority of the trustees of a mutual fund who are not parties to an investment advisory agreement for the fund or “interested persons” of the fund, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”) review and approve the investment advisory agreement at an in person meeting for an initial period of up to two years and thereafter on an annual basis. A summary of the material factors considered by the Independent Trustees and the Boards of Trustees (the “Board”) of HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds), HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (each, a “Trust”) in connection with approving investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the series of the Trusts (each, a “Fund”) during the semi-annual period ended April 30, 2012 and the conclusions the Independent Trustees and Board made as a result of those considerations are set forth below.
I. Annual Continuation of Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements
The Board met in person on December 15-16, 2011 and the Contracts and Expense Committee thereof, which consists of the Independent Trustees of the Trusts (the “Contracts Committee”), met on November 29 and December 15, 2011 to consider, among other matters:
- the approval of the continuation of the: (i) Investment Advisory Contracts and related Supplements (“Advisory Contracts”) between the Trusts and HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”) and (ii) Sub- Advisory Agreements (“Sub-Advisory Contracts”) between the Adviser and each investment sub-adviser (“Sub- Adviser”) to one or more Funds; and
- the approval of the continuation of certain other ancillary agreements to which the Adviser is a party that obligate the Adviser to provide the Funds with administrative services, such as the Administration Agreement, Support Services Agreement and Operational Support Services Agreement (each, an “Ancillary Agreement”).
Prior to the meetings, the Independent Trustees received and reviewed the information they thought reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Advisory Contracts, Sub-Advisory Contracts and Ancillary Agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”). This information included, among other things, information about: (i) the services that the Adviser and Sub-Advisers provide; (ii) the personnel who provide such services; (iii) investment performance; (iv) trading practices of the Adviser and Sub-Advisers; (v) fees received or to be received by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, including in comparison with the advisory fees paid by other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vi) total expense ratios, including in comparison with the total expense ratios of other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vii) the profitability of the Adviser and certain of the Sub-Advisers; and (viii) compliance-related matters pertaining to the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. Counsel to the Trusts and to the Independent Trustees were present at each Contracts Committee meeting and the Board meeting. In this regard, counsel to the Independent Trustees advised the Independent Trustees with respect to their deliberations during the process and their fiduciary obligations under Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act.
On November 29, 2011, the Contracts Committee convened and its members reviewed the information provided in advance of the meeting and discussed, among other things: (i) the Administration Agreement; (ii) the Trusts’ arrangements with the Sub-Advisers and the Funds advised by the Sub-Advisers; (iii) the fees and performance record of the Funds that are money market funds (“Money Market Funds”); and (iv) compliance matters. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Committee requested certain additional information from the Adviser with respect to other accounts managed by the Adviser and pricing information regarding certain Funds, among other matters. The Contracts Committee also convened on December 15, 2011 to discuss, among other things: (i) the Adviser’s investment advisory arrangements with respect to the Aggressive Strategy Fund, Balanced Strategy Fund, Conservative Strategy Fund, and Moderate Strategy Fund (collectively, the “World Selection Funds”); (ii) the HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund (formerly, HSBC Investor U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund); (iii) certain subadvisory fee breakpoints; (iv) services provided to the Funds under the Ancillary Agreements; and (v) the Adviser’s response to the follow-up questions posed by the Contracts Committee following the November 29, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting. Following the December 15, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting, the members of the Contracts Committee determined to recommend to the Board, including the Independent Trustees, that the Agreements be continued for an additional one-year period.
At the in-person meeting held on December 15-16, 2011, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed the materials and other information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and considered the previous deliberations and recommendation of the Contracts Committee. As a result of this process, the Board and Independent Trustees determined to approve the continuation of the Agreements with respect to each Fund.
HSBC PORTFOLIOS 65
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited) (continued)
The Board and the Independent Trustees made these determinations on the basis of the following considerations, among others:
Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided by Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees examined the nature, quality and extent of the investment advisory and administrative support services provided by the Adviser to the Funds, as well as the quality and experience of the Adviser’s personnel. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Multimanager unit with respect to the World Selection Funds and the equity Funds, the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Emerging Markets Debt Team with respect to the emerging markets debt Funds, as well as the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s portfolio management and credit review teams with respect to the Money Market Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the nature, quality and extent of the administrative support services that the Adviser provides to the Funds, including the Adviser’s oversight and management of the Funds’ other service providers.
The Independent Trustees also took note of: (i) the long-term relationship between the Adviser and the Funds; (ii) the Adviser’s reputation and financial condition; (iii) the reduction during the period in the HSBC Family of Fund’s net assets; (iv) the liquidation of certain Funds; and (v) the efforts undertaken by the Adviser to foster the growth and development of the Funds since the inception of each of the Funds, including the recent development and launch of the HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund and HSBC Frontier Markets Fund. With respect to the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the financial support the Adviser and its affiliates have afforded the Money Market Funds, such as the fee waivers and reimbursements made to maintain a non-negative yield for the Money Market Funds more recently. In addition, the Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s performance in fulfilling its responsibilities for overseeing its own and the Sub-Advisers’ compliance with the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures and investment objectives.
The Independent Trustees also examined the nature, quality and extent of the services that the Sub-Advisers provide to their respective Funds. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the investment performance and the portfolio risk characteristics achieved by the Sub-Advisers and the Sub-Advisers’ portfolio management teams, their experience, and the quality of their compliance programs, among other factors.
Based on these considerations, the Independent Trustees concluded that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, and that the services provided supported continuance of the Agreements.
Investment Performance of the Funds, Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the investment performance of each Fund over various periods of time, as compared to one another as well as to comparable funds and one or more benchmark indices. In the context of the World Selection Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the relative underperformance of the World Selection Funds in light of data provided by Lipper Inc., and representations by the Adviser regarding market factors that contributed to the relative underperformance, as well as their investment outlook. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Growth Portfolio), the Independent Trustees favorably noted the consistent performance record of the Portfolio. In the context of the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the yield support that the Adviser had provided in order for the Money Market Funds to retain non-negative performance. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds’ investment performance and the Adviser’s actions to improve investment performance, where applicable, supported continuance of the Agreements.
Costs of Services and Profits Realized by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the costs of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and the expense ratios of the Funds more generally. The Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s profitability and costs, including by means of an analysis provided by the Adviser of its estimated profitability attributable to its relationship with the Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts and compared those fees to the fees of similar funds, which had been compiled and provided by Lipper Inc. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds had advisory fees competitive with those of similar funds, noting the resources, expertise and experience provided to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also compared the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts with those of other accounts managed by the Adviser, and evaluated information provided as to why advisory fees may differ between mutual funds and other advisory relationships, including increased shareholder activity. In this regard, the Independent Trustees concluded that differences in advisory fees assessed between the Funds and other accounts managed by the Adviser did not preclude approval of the Advisory Contracts.
66 HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited) (continued)
With respect to the administrative support services provided by the Adviser, the Independent Trustees considered the fees charged for such services and evaluated the fees payable to the Adviser and those payable to other providers of administrative services to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also considered the costs of the services provided by the Sub-Advisers, as applicable; the relative portions of the total advisory fees paid to the Sub-Advisers and retained by the Adviser in its capacity as the Funds’ investment adviser; and the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio, the Independent Trustees considered the subadvisory fee breakpoint structure. The Independent Trustees also considered information on profitability where provided by the Sub-Advisers.
The Independent Trustees concluded that the advisory fees payable to the Adviser and the Funds’ Sub-Advisers were fair and reasonable in light of the factors set forth above.
Other Relevant Considerations. The Independent Trustees also considered the extent to which the Adviser and Sub-Advisers had achieved economies of scale, whether the Funds’ expense structure permits economies of scale to be shared with the Funds’ shareholders and, if so, the extent to which the Funds’ shareholders may benefit from these economies of scale. The Independent Trustees also noted the contractual caps on certain Fund expenses provided by the Adviser with respect to many of the Funds in order to reduce or control the overall operating expenses of those Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered certain information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers with respect to the benefits they may derive from their relationships with the Funds, including the fact that certain Sub-Advisers have “soft dollar” arrangements with respect to Fund brokerage and therefore may have access to research and other permissible services.
In light of the above considerations and such other factors and information it considered relevant, the Board by a unanimous vote of those present in person at the meeting (including a separate unanimous vote of the Independent Trustees present in person at the meeting) approved the continuation of each Agreement.
HSBC PORTFOLIOS 67
Table of Shareholder Expenses—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Portfolios, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees and other Fund expenses.
These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolios and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012.
Actual Example
The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
| Growth Portfolio | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | | $ | 1,128.00 | | | | $ | 3.70 | | | 0.70 | % |
| Opportunity Portfolio | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,137.10 | | | | | 4.78 | | | 0.90 | % |
____________________
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Portfolio’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on each Portfolio’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Portfolio’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees, or exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
| Growth Portfolio | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | | $ | 1,021.38 | | | | $ | 3.52 | | | 0.70 | % |
| Opportunity Portfolio | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,020.39 | | | | | 4.52 | | | 0.90 | % |
____________________
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Portfolio’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
68 HSBC PORTFOLIOS
Other Information:
Information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-525-5757 for HSBC Bank USA and HSBC Brokerage (USA) Inc. clients and 1-800-782-8183 for all other shareholders; (ii) on the Funds’ website at www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com; and (iii) on the Security and Exchange Commission’s (“Commission”) website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Funds file their complete schedules of portfolio holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds’ Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Funds’ Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The Funds’ Schedules of Investments will be available no later than 60 days after each period end, without charge, on the Funds’ website at www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com.
An investment in a Fund is not a deposit of HSBC Bank USA, National Association, and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.
HSBC PORTFOLIOS 69
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS: INVESTMENT ADVISER AND ADMINISTRATOR HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 SUB-ADVISERS HSBC Growth Portfolio Winslow Capital Management, Inc. 4720 IDS Tower 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 HSBC Opportunity Portfolio Westfield Capital Management Company, L.P. One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111 | SHAREHOLDER SERVICING AGENTS For HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. Clients HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 1-888-525-5757 For All Other Shareholders HSBC Funds P.O. Box 182845 Columbus, OH 43218 1-800-782-8183 TRANSFER AGENT Citi Fund Services 3435 Stelzer Road Columbus, OH 43219 DISTRIBUTOR Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. 690 Taylor Road, Suite 150 Gahanna, OH 43230 CUSTODIAN The Northern Trust Company 50 South LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60603 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM KPMG LLP 191 West Nationwide Blvd., Suite 500 Columbus, OH 43215 LEGAL COUNSEL Dechert LLP 1775 I Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb3ae/fb3ae438ac4e9556aacc1b065ed91acd4c8a5fd7" alt=""
The HSBC Family of Funds are distributed by Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. This document must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus for the HSBC Funds, which you should read carefully before you invest or send money.
— NOT FDIC INSURED | — NO BANK GUARANTEE | — MAY LOSE VALUE |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75c7c/75c7cda1f223d5f7ece6dbd4fbcacceb07822b20" alt=""
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. April 30, 2012 |
HSBC Funds
Semi-Annual Report
MONEY MARKET FUNDS | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class D | | Class E | | Class I | | Class Y |
HSBC New York Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | RNTXX | | HNBXX | | HNCXX | | HNYXX | | RYEXX | | — | | RYYXX |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSBC Prime Money Market Fund | | REAXX | | HSMXX | | HMMXX | | HIMXX | | HMEXX | | HSIXX | | RMYXX |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSBC Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | HBAXX | | HBBXX | | HBCXX | | HBDXX | | HBEXX | | HCIXX | | HBYXX |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSBC U.S. Government Money Market Fund | | FTRXX | | HUBXX | | HUMXX | | HGDXX | | HGEXX | | HGIXX | | RGYXX |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund | | HWAXX | | HTBXX | | HUCXX | | HTDXX | | HTEXX | | HBIXX | | HTYXX |
HSBC Family of Funds
Semi-Annual Report - April 30, 2012
Glossary of Terms | | |
Chairman’s Message | | 4 |
President’s Message | | 6 |
Commentary From the Investment Manager | | 7 |
Portfolio Reviews | | 8 |
Schedules of Portfolio Investments | | |
HSBC New York Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | 14 |
HSBC Prime Money Market Fund | | 18 |
HSBC Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | 21 |
HSBC U.S. Government Money Market Fund | | 25 |
HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund | | 27 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | | 28 |
Statements of Operations | | 30 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | | 32 |
Financial Highlights | | 38 |
Notes to Financial Statements | | 43 |
Investment Adviser Contract Approval | | 52 |
Table of Shareholder Expenses | | 55 |
Other Information | | 57 |
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index generally representative of investment-grade, fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year.
Barclays Capital U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index is an unmanaged index that measures the non-investment grade, USD-denominated, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high-yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. The index excludes emerging markets debt.
Lipper Money Market Funds Average is an equally weighted average of mutual funds that invest in high-quality financial instruments rated in the top two grades with dollar-weighted average maturities of less than 90 days. These funds intend to keep constant net asset value.
Lipper New York Tax-Exempt Money Market Funds Average is an equally weighted average of mutual funds that invest in New York municipal obligations with dollar weighted average maturities of less than 90 days. These funds intend to keep a constant net asset value.
Lipper Tax Exempt Money Market Funds Average is an equally weighted average of mutual funds that invest in high-quality municipal obligations with dollar-weighted average maturities of less than 90 days. These funds intend to keep constant net asset value.
Lipper U.S. Government Money Market Funds Average is an equally weighted average of mutual funds that invest principally in financial instruments issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies, or its instrumentalities, with dollar-weighted average maturities of less than 90 days. These funds intend to keep constant net asset value.
Lipper U.S. Treasury Money Market Funds Average is an equally weighted average of mutual funds that invest principally in U.S. Treasury obligations with dollar weighted average maturities of less than 90 days. These funds intend to keep a constant net asset value.
Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is an unmanaged free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of the following 22 developed market countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets (“MSCI EM”) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. The MSCI EM Index consists of the following 21 emerging market countries: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey.
Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index is an unmanaged index that is widely regarded as a gauge of the U.S. equities market. This index includes 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. The S&P 500 Index focuses on the large-cap segment of the market, with approximately 75% coverage of U.S. equities.
Lipper is an independent mutual fund performance monitor whose results are based on total return and do not reflect a sales charge.
Securities indices assume reinvestment of all distributions and interest payments and do not take in account brokerage fees or expenses. Securities in the Funds do not match those in the indices and performance of the Funds will differ. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
June 11, 2012
To Our Investors:
Investors today face a number of troubling macroeconomic issues, including a U.S. economy still struggling to recover from the widespread global downturn that began more than four years ago. Despite modest improvements in certain areas, such as the housing market and corporate profits, the economy still faced major headwinds, particularly from continued weakness in the U.S. job market. A lack of clarity on the economic outlook has led to considerable volatility in the markets: Stocks seem to rally strongly one week only to falter and shed those gains the following week. Meanwhile, conservative assets such as Treasury and money market securities have seen yields fall to historically low levels. These low yields are due in part to Federal Reserve actions designed to keep interest rates low in hopes of jumpstarting the economy.
Europe’s debt woes also are a significant source of worry for investors today. Concerns are mounting that efforts by the European Central Bank and eurozone governments to rein in the region’s debt crisis have been insufficient, and that the specter of economic recession and even default continues to loom over the region. Meanwhile governments in Europe face pressures to address their debt issues while curbing spending. It is unclear how the European debt crisis will play out, but we expect that it may take several years for these issues to unwind.
We are keeping a close watch on potential regulatory changes in the money markets. In response to a period of market illiquidity and disruptions in 2008, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has engaged in an ongoing examination of the money market fund model to determine whether changes are needed. That initiative led to rule changes in 2010, and the possibility of more changes to protect money market funds from the risk of broad-based, large-scale redemptions. Two options under consideration would impose capital requirements and limitations or fees on redemptions, among other restrictions.
The money market fund industry has expressed concerns with these proposals, and it appears that there is insufficient support for additional money market fund reforms among the five SEC commissioners. However, there is the possibility that the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) may intervene in the matter if the SEC does not adopt additional reforms. Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, who is a member of the FSOC, recently expressed his support for increased regulation of money market funds.
At this point, it is not possible to predict where this debate will end and what reform, if any, will ultimately be adopted. We will continue to monitor reform proposals as we work to provide the best money market fund structures and products to meet the needs of our shareholders.
Assets in our money market funds continue to decline due in large part to the historically low yields available in the money markets. HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc., the Funds’ investment advisor, along with the Funds’ other service providers provided yield support of approximately $9.9 million, during the six months’ ended April 30, 2012, to the HSBC Money Market Funds.
4 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Chairman’s Message (continued) |
We are pleased to introduce two new funds in this semi-annual report. The HSBC World Selection Income Strategy Fund and the HSBC Total Return Fund. The Income Strategy Fund seeks to provide current income by investing primarily in underlying funds by utilizing a “fund of funds” structure. The Total Return Fund seeks to maximize total return which is comprised of capital appreciation and income. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing its assets in issuers that are economically tied to emerging market countries.
During the period, due to small asset bases and dwindling investor demand, we liquidated the HSBC Investor Value Fund, the HSBC Investor International Equity and the HSBC Investor Overseas Equity Fund. We continue to review the fund offerings of the HSBC Fund Family to meet the needs of our clients.
Cordially, |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b00e/7b00e6d59e7d6f47bee6c2ff0b4b296e017a4c43" alt="" |
Michael Seely Chairman, HSBC Funds |
This literature must be preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus for the HSBC Funds. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment company carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company. To obtain more information, for clients of HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., please call 1-888-525-5757 or visit www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com. For other investors and prospective investors, please call the Funds directly at 1-888-936-4722 or visit or www.emfunds.us.hsbc.com. Investors should read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 5
Dear Shareholder,
Welcome to the HSBC Funds semi-annual report, covering the period between November 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012. This report offers detailed information about your Funds’ investment results. We encourage you to review it carefully.
Inside these pages you will find a letter from the Funds’ Chairman, Michael Seely, in which he comments on recent market developments. The report also includes commentary from the Funds’ portfolio managers in which they discuss the investment markets and their respective Fund’s performance. Each commentary may also be accompanied by the Fund’s return for the period, listed alongside the returns of its benchmark index and peer group average for comparative purposes.
On March 20 of this year we launched the World Selection Income Strategy Fund. This Fund adds an income-oriented strategy to the World Selection suite of funds, which includes the Aggressive Strategy, Balanced Strategy, Moderate Strategy, and Conservative Strategy Funds.
On March 30, we also launched the HSBC Total Return Fund. The launch of this fund further expands on our offerings in the emerging markets – one of HSBC’s core strengths. The Total Return Fund joins the Emerging Markets Debt Fund, the Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund, and the Frontier Markets Fund as our initial fund offerings in this exciting segment of the investment market
In closing, we would like to thank you for investing through the HSBC Funds. We continue to focus the HSBC Fund Family on long-term investment solutions to assist our customers in reaching their financial goals. We appreciate the trust you place in us, and will continue working to earn it. Please contact us at any time with questions or concerns.
Sincerely, |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b58f6/b58f600b8e6248150175efa5867d28eea323ff31" alt="" |
Richard A. Fabietti President |
6 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Commentary From the Investment Manager |
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc.
U.S. Economic Review
The global economy’s recovery from a historic downturn regained momentum during the six-month period between November 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012 after slowing throughout much of 2011. Moderate economic growth was fueled by increased consumer confidence, improved U.S. economic data, continued strength in emerging economies and better-than-expected corporate earnings. The economic recovery continued to benefit from the Federal Reserve Board’s pledge to maintain the federal funds rate—a key factor in lending rates—at a historically low target range between 0.00% and 0.25% through 2014.
As the period began, ongoing concerns about the eurozone debt crisis continued to fuel fears of a new global recession. However, financial markets underwent a significant shift from the volatile and bearish events of the previous six months. Fears about Europe began to subside somewhat during the first months of 2012, due in part to efforts by the European Central Bank (ECB) to stabilize the region’s banking system through infusions of capital. Meanwhile, moderate economic growth in the U.S. and, although slowing, still relatively strong growth in emerging markets helped assuage fears of a global economic downturn.
The ECB efforts to stem a liquidity crisis in European nations during the period helped alleviate fears of deepening credit problems in the eurozone. In December, the ECB began distributing inexpensive loans to European banks as part of its long-term refinancing operation (LTRO) and in March began making similar loans from an even larger pool of funds. The LTRO appeared to stabilize financial markets in the short term, but significant uncertainties remained regarding the long-term prospects of peripheral European economies to regain their competitiveness and avoid the threat of defaults. The ability of countries such as Italy, Greece and Spain to regain the confidence of the markets remained in doubt, and the long-term impact of austerity programs on economic growth also raised concerns.
Growth remained robust in many emerging economies during the period, and inflation, which had been a significant concern in previous months, eased in some nations. Economic growth in China slowed due to declining exports and industrial production as well as low levels of lending. But most signs indicated that robust domestic demand would prevent a “hard landing” for the Chinese economy. Oil prices eased somewhat during the period.
U.S. Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”)1 grew at 3.0% during the fourth quarter of 2011, a significant increase from the previous quarter. A preliminary estimate puts GDP during the first quarter at 1.9%. Job creation was robust during much of the period, and jobless claims continued a generally downward trend. However, unemployment remained relatively high. The housing market showed signs of improvement. Home sales began to stabilize and inventories began to decrease. Meanwhile, encouraging economic data bolstered the recovery. Reports showed that motor vehicle sales were strong, U.S. exports had accelerated and industrial production had increased.
Market Review
The period began with the final stretch of a sell-off in U.S. equity markets that had begun in mid-summer. After bottoming out in late November, equities changed direction with a strong rally that persisted through the duration of the period. Equities’ strong performance during the period was supported by increased optimism that the U.S. would avoid a “double dip” recession—a threat that preoccupied investors in 2011. During the period, stocks in cyclical sectors tended to perform best, while more defensive sectors lagged behind.
Stocks in other developed economies rose, too. Japanese equities performed especially well due to a strong economic rebound during the first quarter of 2012. European stocks made gains, but lagged behind U.S. markets. The S&P 500 Index1 of large-company stocks returned 12.77% for the six months ended April 2012. The MSCI EAFE Index1 of developed foreign markets returned 2.71% for the period as a whole, while the MSCI EM Index1 returned 4.02%.
Among fixed-income securities, yields on U.S. Treasury bonds increased during the period, sending prices lower. Investment grade corporate bonds showed strength, as investors sought additional yield in a low interest rate environment. High-yield bonds performed especially well as their yield spread over U.S. Treasuries declined during the period. Fixed-income markets in emerging economies performed well, as investors became more confident in the credit worthiness of emerging nations and were attracted to the additional yield of such securities. The Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, which tracks the broad investment-grade fixed-income market, returned 2.44% for the six months ended April 30, 2012, while the Barclays Capital U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index1 returned 6.91%.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 7
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC New York Tax-Free Money Market Fund
(Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares and Class Y Shares)
by Jason Moshos
Senior Portfolio Manager
Investment Concerns
An investment in the Fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund. The Fund’s income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and to certain state and local taxes. Regional funds may be subject to additional risk, since the majority of issues they invest in are located in one geographical area.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Portfolio Performance
Yields on tax-free money market securities persisted at historic lows during the six-month period ended April 30, 2012. The federal funds rate—a key short-term interest rate that influences yields on money market securities—remained within a range of 0.00% to 0.25% throughout the period. In that environment, investors withdrew funds from tax-free money funds in order to capture higher yields available from other types of securities.
During the period, New York state and local governments continued to experience budgetary constraints due to high unemployment and declining tax receipts. These problems weakened the credit quality of many municipal securities, and investors worried that municipalities may have trouble meeting their financial obligations. The managers took a defensive approach with the Fund’s portfolio in response to the difficult credit environment by focusing on high-quality issues and deemphasizing lower rated securities to pursue the Fund’s primary goal of capital preservation. Management maintained a weighted average maturity that was shorter than that of its peers in order to enhance the Fund’s liquidity.*
The period was also characterized by a low supply of tax-free money market securities. That low supply contributed to low absolute yields on these securities. The low supply was due in part to municipalities delaying new spending and borrowing, and favoring longer-term debt to capitalize on historically low interest rates when they did borrow. Meanwhile, demand for tax-free money market securities increased during the period as nontraditional buyers, such as taxable money market funds, were attracted by the slightly higher yields on tax-free securities.
*Portfolio composition is subject to change.
| | | | | | Average Annual | Yield | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | (%)1 | | Ratio (%)2 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | 10 | | Since | | 7-Day | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Year | | Inception | | Average | | Gross | | Net |
Class A | | 11/17/94 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.73 | | 1.04 | | | | 1.79 | | | | 0.00 | | 0.66 | | 0.66 |
Class B3 | | 4/29/98 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | | | 0.89 | | | | — | | 1.26 | | 1.26 |
Class C4 | | 3/19/01 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | | | 0.77 | | | | — | | 1.26 | | 1.26 |
Class D | | 4/1/99 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.79 | | 1.15 | | | | 1.49 | | | | 0.00 | | 0.51 | | 0.51 |
Class Y | | 7/1/96 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.90 | | 1.33 | | | | 1.93 | | | | 0.00 | | 0.26 | | 0.26 |
Lipper New York Tax-Exempt Money Market Funds Average5 | | — | | 0.01 | | 0.04 | | 0.81 | | 1.17 | | | | 1.90 | 6 | | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower.
Certain returns shown include monies received by the Fund in respect of a one-time payment in respect of a class action settlement and a onetime reimbursement from the HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. related to past marketing arrangements. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Fund not received the payments.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | The seven-day yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the money market fund than the total return quotation. The seven-day yield reflects voluntary fee waivers/expense reimbursements. Without the voluntary fee waivers/expense reimbursements, the yields would have been -0.44%, -0.29% and -0.04% for Class A Shares, Class D Shares and Class Y Shares, respectively. |
2 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. |
3 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 4.00%. Class B Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 190 days during the year ended October 31, 2010. The Class was operational during the entire years ended October 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. The Class was not operational during the entire year ended October 31, 2011, respectively, and the entire six-months ended April 30, 2012. |
4 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 1.00%. Class C Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 227, 145, 81 and 81 days during the years ended October 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The Class had no operations during the entire years ended October 31, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and the entire six-months ended April 30, 2012. |
5 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
6 | Return for the period October 31, 1994 to April 30, 2012. |
8 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Prime Money Market Fund (Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares) by John Chiodi Senior Portfolio Manager | Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s have assigned an “Aaa” and “AAAm” rating to the HSBC Prime Money Market Fund.1 |
Investment Concerns
An investment in the Fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Portfolio Performance
Money market yields remained low for the six-month period ended April 30, 2012 due largely to continued concerns about the stability of domestic and overseas economies.
Early in the period, investors maintained an unease about the stability of European economies in the wake of the eurozone debt crisis. As a result, investors favored highly liquid short-term investments. However, efforts by the European Central Bank (ECB) to address the debt crisis—through the use of long-term refinancing obligations—helped to ease those concerns, and investors later in the period sought out higher yielding, longer term securities.
Meanwhile, interest rates remained at historically low levels during the period, with the federal funds rate hovering at a target of 0.00% to 0.25%. Those target rates contributed to the relatively low yields among money market securities.
Early in the period we positioned the Fund with a relatively short weighted average maturity, due largely to the risks posed by the struggling European economies. As the period progressed the markets responded positively to the ECB’s efforts to address the region’s debt issues. As a result, we shifted from securities with maturities of three months or less to floating-rate notes of up to one year in maturity. The bias toward longer weighted maturity is due to the Federal Reserve Board’s pledge to maintain the federal funds rate at a target of 0.00% to 0.25% through late 2014.
Additionally, we removed from our approved issuers list a number of financial institutions that credit rating agency Moody’s had placed on its negative watch list at the halfway point of the period.
| | | | | | Average Annual | | | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Yield (%)2 | | Ratio (%)3 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | 10 | | Since | | 7-Day | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Year | | Inception | | Average | | Gross | | Net |
Class A | | 11/13/98 | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | | 1.08 | | 1.60 | | | | 2.31 | | | | 0.01 | | 0.68 | | 0.68 |
Class B4 | | 4/4/01 | | -3.99 | | -3.99 | | 0.87 | | 1.27 | | | | 1.32 | | | | 0.01 | | 1.28 | | 1.28 |
Class C5 | | 3/23/01 | | -0.97 | | -0.96 | | 0.87 | | 1.24 | | | | 1.30 | | | | 0.01 | | 1.28 | | 1.28 |
Class D | | 4/1/99 | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | | 1.14 | | 1.71 | | | | 2.36 | | | | 0.01 | | 0.53 | | 0.53 |
Class I | | 1/9/02 | | 0.06 | | 0.10 | | 1.37 | | 2.01 | | | | 2.01 | | | | 0.16 | | 0.18 | | 0.18 |
Class Y | | 11/12/98 | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | | 1.26 | | 1.90 | | | | 2.63 | | | | 0.03 | | 0.28 | | 0.28 |
Lipper Money Market Funds Average6 | | — | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | | 1.06 | | 1.52 | | | | 2.25 | 7 | | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower.
Certain returns shown include monies received by the Fund in respect of a one-time payment in respect of a class action settlement and a onetime reimbursement from the HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. related to past marketing arrangements. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Fund not received the payments.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | The “Aaa” and “AAAm” money market fund rating is historical and reflects Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s opinion as to the quality of the Fund’s investments, liquidity management, and operations and trading support. Periodic reviews are conducted to ensure a secure operations environment. Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s ratings represent an opinion only, not a recommendation to buy or sell. Obligations rated A-1+, A-1 or P-1 are rated in the highest short-term rating category by Standard & Poor’s (A-1+ or A-1) or Moody’s Investor Service (P-1). The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on these obligations is regarded to be “extremely strong” (A-1+), “strong” (A-1) or “superior” (P-1). |
2 | The seven-day yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the money market fund than the total return quotation. The seven-day yield reflects voluntary fee waivers/expense reimbursements. Without the voluntary fee waivers/expense reimbursements, the yields would have been -0.37%, -0.97%, -0.97%, -0.22%, 0.13% and 0.03% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares, respectively. |
3 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. |
4 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 4.00%. Class B Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 147 and 211 days for the years ended October 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Class was operational during the entire years ended October 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively and for the entire six-months ended April 30, 2012. |
5 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 1.00%. Class C Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 201 days for the year ended October 31, 2001. The Class was operational during the entire years ended October 31, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and for the entire six-months ended April 30, 2012. |
6 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
7 | Return for the period October 31, 1998 to April 30, 2012. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 9
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Tax-Free Money Market Fund (Class A Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares) by Jason Moshos Senior Portfolio Manager |
Investment Concerns
An investment in the Fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund. The Fund’s income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and to certain state and local taxes.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Portfolio Performance
For the six-month period ended April 30, 2012, broader interest rates and yields on money market securities remained at historically low levels. For example, the federal funds rate—a key short-term interest rate—remained within a range of 0.00% to 0.25% throughout the period. In that environment, investors withdrew funds from tax-free money funds in order to capture higher yields available from other types of securities
Continued high unemployment and falling tax receipts put pressure on state and local governments’ budgets during the period. Those conditions, in turn, led to declines in credit quality across the municipal sector. In response to the difficult credit environment, and to pursue the Fund’s primary goal of capital preservation, the managers took a defensive approach by favoring high-quality securities and underweighting low-quality issues. The managers maintained a weighted average maturity for the period that was in line with that of its peers.*
The period was also characterized by a low supply of tax-free money market securities. That low supply contributed to low absolute yields on these securities. The low supply was due in part to municipalities delaying on new spending and borrowing, and favoring longer-term debt to capitalize on historically low interest rates when they did borrow. Meanwhile, demand for tax-free money market securities increased during the period as nontraditional buyers, such as taxable money market funds, were attracted by the slightly higher yields on tax-free securities.
*Portfolio composition is subject to change.
| | | | | | Average Annual | | | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Yield (%)1 | | Ratio (%)2 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | Since | | 7-Day | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Inception | | Average | | Gross | | Net |
Class A3 | | 8/27/04 | | — | | — | | — | | | | 0.41 | | | | — | | 0.83 | | 0.83 |
Class C4 | | 7/30/07 | | — | | — | | — | | | | 0.09 | | | | — | | 1.43 | | 1.43 |
Class D | | 8/24/04 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.80 | | | | 1.31 | | | | 0.00 | | 0.68 | | 0.68 |
Class I5 | | 6/25/04 | | — | | — | | — | | | | 0.27 | | | | — | | 0.33 | | 0.33 |
Class Y | | 6/8/04 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.94 | | | | 1.48 | | | | 0.00 | | 0.43 | | 0.43 |
Lipper Tax-Exempt Money Market Funds Average6 | | — | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | | 0.80 | | | | 1.28 | 7 | | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower.
Certain returns shown include monies received by the Fund in respect of a one-time payment in respect of a class action settlement. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Fund not received the payments.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | The seven-day yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the money market fund than the total return quotation. The seven-day yield reflects voluntary fee waivers/expense reimbursements. Without the voluntary fee waivers/expense reimbursements, the yields would have been -0.24% and -0.49% for Class D Shares and Class Y Shares, respectively. |
2 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. |
3 | Class A Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 5, 78, 24 and 262 days during the years ended October 31, 2004, 2006, 2007 and 2009, respectively and 141 days for the six-months ended April 30, 2012. The Class was operational during the entire years ended October 31, 2010 and 2011. |
4 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 1.00%. Class C Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 15 days during the year ended October 31, 2007. The Class had no operations during the entire years ended October 31, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, respectively, and the entire six-months ended April 30, 2012. |
5 | Class I Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 40, 27 and 51 days during the years ended October 31, 2004, 2005 and 2010, respectively. The Class had no operations during the entire years ended October 31, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, respectively, and the entire six-months ended April 30, 2012. |
6 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
7 | Return for the period May 31, 2004 to April 30, 2012. |
10 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC U.S. Government Money Market Fund (Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares) by John Chiodi Senior Portfolio Manager | Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s have assigned an “Aaa” and “AAAm” rating to the HSBC U.S. Government Money Market Fund.1 |
Investment Concerns
An investment in the Fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Portfolio Performance
Yields on U.S. government money market securities remained low for the six-month period ended April 30, 2012. The federal funds rate (a key short-term interest rate) remained within a range of 0.00% to 0.25% throughout the period.
Continued concerns about the ongoing sovereign debt crisis in Europe led to a flight to quality among investors, and contributed to low yields in the money markets. Increased demand for short-term repurchase agreements (“repos”) also drove down yields early in the period. Demand for U.S. Treasury bills decreased during the period as investor sentiment improved, partly due to the successful effect the European Central Bank’s long-term refinancing operation had on easing tightened liquidity. Improved liquidity resulted in an increase in yield on repos as demand decreased.
The Fund maintained an asset mix heavily weighted toward repos. This position was balanced by investing the remaining assets in securities with three- to 12- month maturities.*
*Portfolio composition is subject to change.
| | | | | | Average Annual | | | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Yield (%)2 | | Ratio (%)3 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | 10 | | Since | | 7-Day | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Year | | Inception | | Average | | Gross | | Net |
Class A | | 5/3/90 | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | | 0.93 | | 1.48 | | | | 3.14 | | | | 0.01 | | 0.68 | | 0.68 |
Class B4 | | 9/11/98 | | -3.99 | | -3.99 | | 0.82 | | 1.36 | | | | 1.96 | | | | 0.01 | | 1.28 | | 1.28 |
Class C5 | | 11/20/06 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | | | 1.39 | | | | — | | 1.28 | | 1.28 |
Class D | | 4/1/99 | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | | 0.98 | | 1.58 | | | | 2.20 | | | | 0.01 | | 0.53 | | 0.53 |
Class I6 | | 12/24/03 | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | | 1.16 | | — | | | | 1.71 | | | | 0.01 | | 0.18 | | 0.18 |
Class Y | | 7/1/96 | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | | 1.08 | | 1.76 | | | | 2.86 | | | | 0.01 | | 0.28 | | 0.28 |
Lipper U.S. Government Money Market Funds Average7 | | — | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | | 0.93 | | 1.45 | | | | 3.15 | 8 | | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower.
Certain returns shown include monies received by the Fund in respect of a one-time payment in respect of a class action settlement and a one-time reimbursement from the HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. related to past marketing arrangements. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Fund not received the payments.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | The “Aaa” and “AAAm” money market fund rating is historical and reflects Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s opinion as to the quality of the Fund’s investments, liquidity management, and operations and trading support. Periodic reviews are conducted to ensure a secure operations environment. Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s ratings represent an opinion only, not a recommendation to buy or sell. Obligations rated A-1+, A-1 or P-1 are rated in the highest short-term rating category by Standard & Poor’s (A-1+ or A-1) or Moody’s Investor Service (P-1). The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on these obligations is regarded to be “extremely strong” (A-1+), “strong” (A-1) or “superior” (P-1). |
2 | The seven-day yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the money market fund than the total return quotation. The seven-day yield reflects voluntary fee waivers/expense reimbursements. Without the voluntary fee waivers/expense reimbursements, the yields would have been -0.53%, -1.13%, -0.38%, -0.03% and -0.13% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares, respectively. |
3 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. |
4 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 4.00%. |
5 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 1.00%. Class C Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 346, 362 and 351 days during the years end October 31, 2006, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The Class was not operational during the entire years ended October 31, 2007, 2008, 2011, respectively and the entire six-months ended April 30, 2012. |
6 | Class I Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 10, 89, 136 and 357 days during the years ended October 31, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The Class was operational during the entire years ended October 31, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, respectively, and the entire six-months ended April 30, 2012. |
7 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
8 | Return for the period April 30, 1990 to April 30, 2012. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 11
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund (Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares) | Standard & Poor’s has assigned an “AAA” rating to the HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund.1 |
by John Chiodi Senior Portfolio Manager | |
Investment Concerns
An investment in the Fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund. The Fund’s income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and to certain state and local taxes.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Portfolio Performance
Yields on U.S. Treasury money market securities remained low for the six-month period ended April 30, 2012. The federal funds rate (a key short-term interest rate) stayed within a range of 0.00% to 0.25% throughout the period, and the Federal Reserve Board indicated during the period that it would not raise interest rates for two years.
Yields remained low during the period due in part to continued concerns among investors about the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. Investors during the period favored the safety and liquidity of U.S. Treasuries, and that demand kept prices relatively high and yields relatively low. This flight to quality began to unwind midway through the period. Efforts by the European Central Bank to address the European debt crisis gained traction, and market sentiment improved notably later in the period.
The Fund maintained a relatively longer weighted average maturity to take advantage of higher yields. We positioned the Fund with a barbell strategy to take advantage of a relatively steep U.S. Treasury yield curve. The Fund’s exposure to short duration U.S. Treasury bills helped add liquidity while longer maturity U.S. Treasury coupons provided additional yield.*
*Portfolio composition is subject to change.
| | | | | | Average Annual | | | | Expense | |
Fund Performance | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Yield (%)2 | | Ratio (%)3 | |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | 5 | | 10 | | Since | | 7-Day | | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Year | | Year | | Inception | | Average | | Gross | | Net | |
Class A | | 5/24/01 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.69 | | 1.24 | | 1.28 | | 0.00 | | 0.68 | | 0.68 | |
Class B4 | | 8/12/04 | | -4.00 | | -3.99 | | 0.52 | | — | | 1.15 | | 0.00 | | 1.28 | | 1.28 | |
Class C5 | | 12/24/03 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 0.04 | | — | | 1.28 | | 1.28 | |
Class D | | 5/14/01 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.73 | | 1.34 | | 1.39 | | 0.00 | | 0.53 | | 0.53 | |
Class I6 | | 12/30/03 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.86 | | — | | 1.79 | | 0.00 | | 0.18 | | 0.18 | |
Class Y | | 5/11/01 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.81 | | 1.50 | | 1.57 | | 0.00 | | 0.28 | | 0.28 | |
Lipper U.S. Treasury | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money Market Funds Average7 | | — | | 0.00 | | 0.01 | | 0.74 | | 1.32 | | 1.408 | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower.
Certain returns shown include monies received by the Fund in respect of a one-time payment in respect of a class action settlement and a one-time reimbursement from the HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. related to past marketing arrangements. As a result, the Fund’s total returns for those periods were higher than they would have been had the Fund not received the payments.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | The “AAA” money market fund rating is historical and reflects Standard & Poor’s opinion as to the quality of the Fund’s investments, liquidity management, and operations and trading support. Periodic reviews are conducted to ensure a secure operations environment. Standard & Poor’s rating represent an opinion only, not a recommendation to buy or sell. Obligations rated A-1+, A-1 or P-1 are rated in the highest short-term rating category by Standard & Poor’s (A-1+ or A-1) or Moody’s Investor Service (P-1). The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on these obligations is regarded to be “extremely strong” (A-1+), “strong” (A-1) or “superior” (P-1). |
2 | The seven-day yield quotation typically more closely reflects the current earnings of the money market fund than the total return quotation. The seven-day yield reflects voluntary fee waivers/expense reimbursements. Without the voluntary fee waivers/expense reimbursements, the yields would have been -0.60%, -1.20%, -0.45%, -0.10% and -0.20% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares, respectively. |
3 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. |
4 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 4.00%. |
5 | Reflects the applicable contingent deferred sales charge, maximum of 1.00%. Class C Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 26 and 351 days during the years ended October 31, 2008 and 2010, respectively. The Class was operational during the entire years ended October 31, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2009. The Class was not operational during the entire year ended October 31, 2011, and the entire six-months ended April 30, 2012. |
6 | Class I Shares were operational during a portion of the periods presented. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the Class had operations, which was 13 and 280 days during the years ended October 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively. The Class was operational during the entire years ended October 31, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 respectively, and the entire six-months ended April 30, 2012. |
7 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
8 | Return for the period April 30, 2001 to April 30, 2012. |
12 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Composition*
April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
HSBC New York Tax-Free Money Market Fund |
Investment Allocation | | Percentage of Investments at Value (%) |
Variable Rate Demand Notes | | | 81.3 | |
Municipal Bonds | | | 18.7 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
| |
HSBC Prime Money Market Fund |
Investment Allocation | | Percentage of Investments at Value (%) |
Commercial Paper and Notes | | | 38.5 | |
Certificates of Deposit | | | 21.4 | |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | | 10.7 | |
Repurchase Agreements | | | 8.1 | |
Corporate Obligations | | | 6.6 | |
Time Deposits | | | 5.2 | |
Yankee Dollars | | | 5.0 | |
Variable Rate Demand Notes | | | 4.5 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
| |
HSBC Tax-Free Money Market Fund |
Investment Allocation | | Percentage of Investments at Value (%) |
Variable Rate Demand Notes | | | 74.9 | |
Municipal Bonds | | | 23.1 | |
Commercial Paper and Notes | | | 2.0 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
HSBC U.S. Government Money Market Fund |
Investment Allocation | | Percentage of Investments at Value (%) |
Repurchase Agreements | | | 66.9 | |
U.S. Government and Government | | | | |
Agency Obligations | | | 19.3 | |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | | 13.8 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
| |
U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund |
Investment Allocation | | Percentage of Investments at Value (%) |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | | 100.0 | |
Total | | | 100.0 | |
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 13 |
HSBC NEW YORK TAX-FREE MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Variable Rate Demand Notes – 81.2% |
| | Principal | | Amortized |
| | Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
New York – 80.2% | | | | |
Albany IDA Civic Facility Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.23%, 6/1/38, | | | | |
(LOC TD Bank N.A.) (a) | | 5,875,000 | | 5,875,000 |
Albany IDA Civic Facility Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.23%, 7/1/38, | | | | |
(LOC TD Banknorth N.A.) (a) | | 4,100,000 | | 4,100,000 |
Albany IDA Housing Revenue Department | | | | |
of Public Work, 0.27%, 8/15/35, AMT, | | | | |
(Credit Support FNMA) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
Buffalo Municipal Water Finance | | | | |
Authority Water Systems Revenue, | | | | |
0.22%, 7/1/35, (LOC JPMorgan | | | | |
Chase Bank) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
Dutchess County IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 0.22%, 7/1/38, | | | | |
(LOC TD Bank N.A.) (a) | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
Hempstead IDA Revenue, 2.00%, 9/15/15, | | | | |
AMT, (LOC Societe Generale) (a) | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
Long Island Power Authority Electrical | | | | |
Systems Revenue, Series 2, | | | | |
Sub-series 2-B, 0.28%, 5/1/33, | | | | |
(LOC Bayerische Landesbank) (a) | | 8,000,000 | | 8,000,000 |
Long Island Power Authority Electrical | | | | |
Systems Revenue, Sub-series 1-B, | | | | |
0.23%, 5/1/33, (LOC State Street Bank | | | | |
& Trust Co.) (a) | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Tax Fund Revenue, | | | | |
Series A-2, 0.22%, 11/1/31, (LOC Bank | | | | |
of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.) (a) | | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Tax Fund Revenue, | | | | |
Sub-series B-1, 0.22%, 11/1/22, (LOC | | | | |
State Street Bank & Trust Co.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Sub-series B-1, 0.22%, 11/1/34, | | | | |
(LOC Scotiabank) (a) | | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
Monroe County IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, 0.25%, 4/1/35, | | | | |
(LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a) | | 900,000 | | 900,000 |
Monroe County IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, 0.24%, 6/1/36, | | | | |
(LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
Monroe County IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, 0.25%, 2/1/38, | | | | |
(LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a) | | 1,700,000 | | 1,700,000 |
Monroe County IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, 0.27%, 4/1/38, | | | | |
(LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a) | | 2,100,000 | | 2,100,000 |
Nassau County IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, 1.70%, 6/1/19, AMT, | | | | |
(LOC Fleet Bank N.A.) (a) | | 1,310,000 | | 1,310,000 |
Nassau County Interim Finance | | | | |
Authority Sales Tax Revenue, Series B, | | | | |
0.22%, 11/15/21, (LOC Sumitomo Mitsui | | | | |
Banking Corp.) (a) | | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
New York City Capital Resources Corp. | | | | |
Revenue, Series B1, 0.33%, 7/1/37, | | | | |
(LOC Bank of America N.A.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City GO, 0.26%, 9/1/35, | | | | |
(LOC Royal Bank of Scotland) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City GO, Series H, | | | | |
Sub-series H-3, 0.32%, 8/1/14, (Credit | | | | |
Support AGM, SPA State Street Bank & | | | | |
Trust Co.) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City GO, Series H, | | | | |
Sub-series H-3, 0.32%, 8/1/21, (Credit | | | | |
Support AGM, SPA State Street Bank & | | | | |
Trust Co.) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
New York City GO, Series I, | | | | |
Sub-series I-6, 0.25%, 4/1/36, | | | | |
(LOC California State Teacher’s | | | | |
Retirement System) (a) | | 3,300,000 | | 3,300,000 |
New York City GO, Sub-series C-4, | | | | |
0.23%, 8/1/20, (LOC Bank of Tokyo- | | | | |
Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City GO, Sub-series D-4, | | | | |
0.40%, 12/1/32, (SPA Calyon Bank) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City GO, Sub-series G-4, | | | | |
0.22%, 3/1/39, (LIQ FAC Barclays | | | | |
Bank plc) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City Health & Hospital Corp. | | | | |
Revenue, Series D, 0.26%, 2/15/26, | | | | |
(Credit Support GO of Corp., LOC | | | | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City Housing Development | | | | |
Corp. Multi-family Housing Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.24%, 9/15/28, AMT, (Credit | | | | |
Support FNMA, LIQ FAC FNMA) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
New York City Housing Development | | | | |
Corp. Multi-family Housing Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.20%, 4/1/31, (Credit Support | | | | |
FHLMC) (a) | | 1,135,000 | | 1,135,000 |
New York City Housing Development | | | | |
Corp. Multi-family Mortgage Revenue, | | | | |
0.22%, 11/1/46, (Credit Support | | | | |
FHLMC, LIQ FAC FHLMC) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City Housing Development | | | | |
Corp. Multi-family Mortgage Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.26%, 1/1/36, AMT, | | | | |
(LOC Citibank N.A.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City Housing Development | | | | |
Corp. Multi-family Mortgage Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.30%, 12/1/37, AMT, | | | | |
(LOC Citibank N.A.) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
New York City Housing Development | | | | |
Corp. Multi-family Mortgage Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.23%, 12/15/37, AMT, (Credit | | | | |
Support FNMA, LIQ FAC FNMA) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City Housing Development | | | | |
Corp. Multi-family Mortgage Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.26%, 1/1/38, AMT, | | | | |
(LOC Citibank N.A.) (a) | | 1,400,000 | | 1,400,000 |
New York City Housing Development | | | | |
Corp. Multi-family Mortgage Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.30%, 11/1/39, AMT, | | | | |
(LOC Citibank N.A.) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City Housing Development | | | | |
Corp. Multi-family Mortgage Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.23%, 10/15/41, (Credit | | | | |
Support FNMA, LIQ FAC FNMA) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
14 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC NEW YORK TAX-FREE MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Variable Rate Demand Notes, continued |
| | Principal | | Amortized |
| | Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
New York, continued | | | | |
New York City Housing Development | | | | |
Corp. Multi-family Mortgage Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.25%, 7/1/43, | | | | |
(LOC Citibank N.A.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, 0.29%, 12/1/36, (LOC | | | | |
JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City IDA Special Facility | | | | |
Revenue, 0.24%, 7/1/24, | | | | |
(LOC Citibank N.A.) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City Municipal Water Finance | | | | |
Authority Water & Sewer System | | | | |
Revenue, Series CC, 0.22%, 6/15/41, | | | | |
(SPA Barclays Bank plc) (a) | | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
New York City Municipal Water | | | | |
Finance Authority Water & Sewer | | | | |
System Revenue, Sub-series B-2, | | | | |
0.23%, 6/15/24, (SPA Lloyds TSB Bank | | | | |
plc) (a) | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
New York City Municipal Water | | | | |
Finance Authority Water & Sewer | | | | |
System Revenue, Sub-series B-4, | | | | |
0.23%, 6/15/45, (SPA Northern Trust | | | | |
Co.) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City Transitional Finance | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series 1, | | | | |
Sub-series 1-D, 0.24%, 11/1/22, (SPA | | | | |
Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City Transitional Finance | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series 3, | | | | |
Sub-series 3-G, 0.21%, 11/1/22, | | | | |
(SPA Bank of New York) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City Transitional Finance | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series A, | | | | |
Sub-series 3-B, 0.21%, 11/1/29, (LOC | | | | |
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City Transitional Finance | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series A2, | | | | |
0.23%, 11/15/27, (SPA Bank of Nova | | | | |
Scotia) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City Transitional Finance | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Sub-series 2-D, | | | | |
0.27%, 11/1/22, (LIQ FAC Lloyds TSB | | | | |
Bank plc) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York City Transitional Finance | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Sub-series 2-F, | | | | |
0.26%, 11/1/22, (LIQ FAC Bayerische | | | | |
Landesbank) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City Transitional Finance | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Sub-series 2C, | | | | |
0.26%, 11/1/22, (LIQ FAC Lloyds TSB | | | | |
Bank plc) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City Transitional Finance | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Sub-series C-2, | | | | |
0.24%, 8/1/31, (SPA Landesbank | | | | |
Hessen-Thuringen) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York City Trust for Cultural | | | | |
Resources Revenue, 0.19%, 4/1/26, | | | | |
(LOC Wells Fargo Bank N.A.) (a) | | 4,800,000 | | 4,800,000 |
New York City Trust for Cultural Resources | | | | |
Revenue, Series B-1, 0.22%, 11/1/38, | | | | |
(LOC U.S. Bank N.A.) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Series D, 0.23%, 7/1/34, | | | | |
(Credit Support XLCA, LOC TD | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 4,550,000 | | 4,550,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Non State Supported | | | | |
Debt, 0.26%, 12/1/36, (LOC TD | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Non State Supported Debt, | | | | |
0.23%, 1/1/39, (LOC TD | | | | |
Banknorth N.A.) (a) | | 3,700,000 | | 3,700,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Non State Supported Debt, | | | | |
Series A, 0.20%, 11/15/36, (Credit | | | | |
Support FNMA, LIQ FAC FNMA) (a) | | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Non State Supported Debt, | | | | |
Series A-1, 0.29%, 7/1/27, | | | | |
(LOC Bank of America N.A.) (a) | | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Non State Supported Debt, | | | | |
Series B, 0.33%, 5/15/39, (LOC | | | | |
Bayerische Landesbank) (a) | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority | | | | |
Revenue, State Supported Debt, | | | | |
Series A, 0.23%, 7/1/31, (LOC JPMorgan | | | | |
Chase Bank) (a) | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
New York State Energy Research & | | | | |
Development Authority Facilities | | | | |
Revenue, 0.24%, 11/1/39, AMT, (LOC | | | | |
Mizuho Corporate Bank) (a) | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
New York State Energy Research & | | | | |
Development Authority Facilities Revenue, | | | | |
Series C2, 0.25%, 11/1/39, AMT, | | | | |
(LOC Mizuho Corporate Bank) (a) | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
New York State Energy Research & | | | | |
Development Authority Facilities | | | | |
Revenue, Sub-series A-1, 0.21%, 5/1/39, | | | | |
(LOC Mizuho Corporate Bank) (a) | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue, 0.30%, 5/15/33, AMT, | | | | |
(Credit Support FNMA) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue, 0.21%, 11/15/37, (Credit | | | | |
Support FNMA) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue, 0.24%, 5/15/28, AMT, | | | | |
(Credit Support FNMA, LOC FNMA) (a) | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 0.24%, 11/1/32, | | | | |
AMT, (Credit Support FHLMC, LIQ | | | | |
FAC FHLMC) (a) | | 2,050,000 | | 2,050,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 0.23%, 5/15/34, | | | | |
(Credit Support FNMA) (a) | | 1,400,000 | | 1,400,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 0.22%, 11/1/41, | | | | |
(LOC Bank of New York) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 0.28%, 5/1/42, | | | | |
(LOC Wells Fargo Bank N.A.) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 15 |
HSBC NEW YORK TAX-FREE MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Variable Rate Demand Notes, continued |
| | Principal | | Amortized |
| | Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
New York, continued | | | | |
New York State Housing Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 0.23%, 5/1/45, | | | | |
(Credit Support FHLMC, LIQ | | | | |
FAC FHLMC) (a) | | 2,500,000 | | 2,500,000 |
New York State Local Government | | | | |
Assistance Corp. Revenue, Series C, | | | | |
0.26%, 4/1/25, (LOC Landesbank | | | | |
Hessen-Thuringen) (a) | | 3,800,000 | | 3,800,000 |
New York State Local Government | | | | |
Assistance Corp. Revenue, Series E, | | | | |
0.30%, 4/1/25, (LOC Landesbank | | | | |
Hessen-Thuringen) (a) | | 3,800,000 | | 3,800,000 |
Ramapo Housing Authority Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.24%, 12/15/38, AMT, | | | | |
(Credit Support FNMA, LIQ FAC | | | | |
FNMA) (a) | | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
Rockland County IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, 0.19%, 12/1/32, (LOC Wells | | | | |
Fargo Bank N.A.) (a) | | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
Rockland County IDA Revenue, | | | | |
0.20%, 7/1/20, (LOC TD Banknorth | | | | |
N.A.) (a) | | 2,740,000 | | 2,740,000 |
Suffolk County IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, 0.62%, 8/1/18, AMT, | | | | |
(LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a) | | 1,950,000 | | 1,950,000 |
Suffolk County Water Authority | | | | |
Revenue, 0.17%, 1/15/13, | | | | |
(SPA Bank of Nova Scotia) (a) | | 4,900,000 | | 4,900,000 |
Syracuse New York IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 0.23%, 12/1/35, | | | | |
(LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Series A-2, 0.23%, 11/1/35, | | | | |
(Credit Support GO of Authority, | | | | |
LOC California State Teacher’s | | | | |
Retirement System) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Series B, 0.20%, 1/1/32, | | | | |
(LOC State Street Bank & Trust Co.) (a) | | 6,000,000 | | 6,000,000 |
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Series B-2C, 0.23%, 1/1/32, | | | | |
(Credit Support GO of Authority, | | | | |
LOC U.S. Bank N.A.) (a) | | 2,500,000 | | 2,500,000 |
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Series B-3, 0.23%, 1/1/33, | | | | |
(Credit Support GO of Authority, LOC | | | | |
U.S. Bank N.A.) (a) | | 2,500,000 | | 2,500,000 |
Ulster County IDA Civic Facility Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.53%, 7/1/21, AMT, (LOC TD | | | | |
Banknorth N.A.) (a) | | 875,000 | | 875,000 |
Westchester County IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, 0.22%, 11/1/24, (LOC | | | | |
Commerce Bank N.A.) (a) | | 2,060,000 | | 2,060,000 |
| | | | 251,945,000 |
| | | | |
Puerto Rico – 1.0% | | | | |
Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, | | | | |
Series C-5-2, 0.25%, 7/1/20, | | | | |
(Credit Support AGM, LOC Barclays | | | | |
Bank plc) (a) | | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
|
TOTAL VARIABLE RATE DEMAND | | | | |
NOTES(COST $254,945,000) | | | | 254,945,000 |
|
Municipal Bonds – 18.6% |
|
New York – 16.2% | | | | |
Erie County IDA School Facility Revenue, | | | | |
5.75%, 5/1/18, (Credit Support AGM, | | | | |
State Aid Withholding), prerefunded | | | | |
5/1/12 @ 100 | | 3,460,000 | | 3,460,000 |
Erie County IDA School Facility Revenue, | | | | |
5.75%, 5/1/21, (Credit Support AGM, | | | | |
State Aid Withholding), prerefunded | | | | |
5/1/12 @ 100 | | 3,275,000 | | 3,275,000 |
Erie County IDA School Facility Revenue, | | | | |
5.75%, 5/1/23, (Credit Support AGM, | | | | |
State Aid Withholding), prerefunded | | | | |
5/1/12 @ 100 | | 1,750,000 | | 1,750,000 |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority | | | | |
Transit Facilities Revenue, Series C, | | | | |
5.13%, 7/1/14, (Credit Support AGM), | | | | |
prerefunded 7/1/12 @ 100 | | 2,630,000 | | 2,651,895 |
New York City IDA Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 6.38%, 7/1/31, | | | | |
prerefunded 7/1/12 @ 100 | | 1,300,000 | | 1,313,288 |
New York State Dormitory Authority | | | | |
Lease Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/32, | | | | |
prerefunded 7/1/12 @ 100 | | 4,000,000 | | 4,032,380 |
New York State Dormitory Authority | | | | |
Revenue, 5.38%, 5/1/23, prerefunded | | | | |
5/1/13 @ 100 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,051,704 |
New York State Dormitory Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 5.13%, 5/15/31, | | | | |
(Credit Support FGIC), prerefunded | | | | |
5/15/12 @ 101 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,011,903 |
New York State Environmental Facilities | | | | |
Corp. Personal Income Tax Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 5.25%, 1/1/19, (Credit Support | | | | |
FGIC), prerefunded 1/1/13 @ 100 | | 2,310,000 | | 2,388,568 |
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | | |
Asset-Backed Revenue, Series B-1C, | | | | |
5.50%, 6/1/18, prerefunded | | | | |
6/1/12 @ 100 | | 20,495,000 | | 20,587,718 |
TSASC, Inc. Tobacco Settlement | | | | |
Asset-Backed Revenue, Series 1, | | | | |
5.75%, 7/15/32, prerefunded | | | | |
7/15/12 @ 100 | | 9,250,000 | | 9,355,605 |
| | | | 50,878,061 |
16 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC NEW YORK TAX-FREE MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Municipal Bonds, continued |
| | Principal | | Amortized |
| | Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
Puerto Rico – 2.4% | | | | |
Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, Series A, | | | | |
5.00%, 7/1/32, (Credit Support FGIC), | | | | |
prerefunded 7/1/12 @ 100 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,008,026 |
Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series D, | | | | |
5.00%, 7/1/27, (Credit Support AGM), | | | | |
prerefunded 7/1/12 @ 100 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,008,015 |
Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series H, | | | | |
5.45%, 7/1/35, prerefunded | | | | |
7/1/12 @ 100 | | 4,270,000 | | 4,307,167 |
Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series D, | | | | |
5.25%, 7/1/38, prerefunded | | | | |
7/1/12 @ 100 | | 1,265,000 | | 1,275,659 |
| | | | 7,598,867 |
|
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS | | | | |
(COST $58,476,928) | | | | 58,476,928 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | | | |
(COST $313,421,928) — 99.8% | | | | 313,421,928 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $314,191,704. |
(a) | Variable rate security. The rate presented represents the rate in effect at April 30, 2012. These securities are deemed to have a maturity remaining until the next adjustment of the interest rate or the longer of the demand period or time to the next readjustment. |
AGM | — | Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation |
AMT | — | Interest on security is subject to federal alternative minimum tax |
FGIC | — | Financial Guaranty Insurance Company |
FHLMC | — | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
FNMA | — | Federal National Mortgage Association |
GO | — | General Obligation |
IDA | — | Industrial Development Agency |
LIQ FAC | — | Liquidity Facility |
LOC | — | Letter of Credit |
SPA | — | Standby Purchase Agreement |
XLCA | — | XL Capital Assurance |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 17 |
HSBC PRIME MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Certificates of Deposit – 21.4% |
| | Principal | | Amortized |
| | Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
Banking – 16.3% | | | | |
Bank of Montreal Chicago, | | | | |
0.14%, 5/3/12 | | 100,000,000 | | 100,000,000 |
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, N.Y., | | | | |
0.37%, 5/29/12 | | 55,000,000 | | 55,000,000 |
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, N.Y., | | | | |
0.53%, 9/4/12 | | 70,000,000 | | 70,000,000 |
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, N.Y., | | | | |
0.86%, 2/14/13 (a) | | 45,000,000 | | 45,000,000 |
National Australia Bank, N.Y., | | | | |
0.34%, 8/16/12 (a) | | 40,000,000 | | 40,000,000 |
Norinchukin Bank, N.Y., 0.17%, 5/12/12 | | 150,000,000 | | 150,000,000 |
Norinchukin Bank, N.Y., 0.50%, 5/17/12 | | 100,000,000 | | 100,000,000 |
Royal Bank of Canada, N.Y., | | | | |
0.46%, 2/15/13 (a) | | 70,000,000 | | 70,000,000 |
Sumitomo Mitsui Bank, N.Y., | | | | |
0.37%, 5/8/12 | | 50,000,000 | | 50,000,000 |
Svenska Handelsbanken, N.Y., | | | | |
0.25%, 7/24/12 | | 30,000,000 | | 30,000,000 |
Svenska Handelsbanken, N.Y., | | | | |
0.58%, 8/13/12 | | 30,000,000 | | 30,000,000 |
Toronto Dominion Bank, N.Y., | | | | |
0.15%, 6/21/12 | | 60,000,000 | | 60,000,000 |
| | | | 800,000,000 |
|
Diversified – 5.1% | | | | |
Abbey National Treasury Service plc, | | | | |
0.25%, 5/1/12 | | 100,000,000 | | 100,000,000 |
Credit Suisse, N.Y., 0.30%, 6/22/12 | | 50,000,000 | | 50,000,715 |
Natixis, N.Y., 0.42%, 6/1/12 | | 100,000,000 | | 100,000,000 |
| | | | 250,000,715 |
TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT | | | | |
(COST $1,050,000,715) | | | | 1,050,000,715 |
|
Commercial Paper and Notes – 38.4% |
|
Banking – 17.2% | | | | |
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group | | | | |
Ltd., 0.35%, 8/29/12 (b)(c) | | 43,250,000 | | 43,199,542 |
Banque et Caisse d’Epargne, | | | | |
0.24%, 6/11/12 (b) | | 50,000,000 | | 49,986,333 |
BPCE, 0.20%, 5/1/12 (b)(c) | | 100,000,000 | | 100,000,000 |
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, N.Y., | | | | |
0.51%, 5/11/12 (a) | | 40,000,000 | | 40,000,000 |
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, N.Y., | | | | |
0.32%, 9/17/12 (a)(c) | | 55,000,000 | | 55,000,000 |
Credit Agricole North America, Inc., | | | | |
0.33%, 5/17/12 (b) | | 100,000,000 | | 99,985,333 |
Credit Agricole North America, Inc., | | | | |
0.43%, 6/19/12 (b) | | 75,000,000 | | 74,956,105 |
DnB NOR Bank ASA, N.Y., | | | | |
0.49%, 8/14/12 (a)(c) | | 45,000,000 | | 45,000,000 |
KfW, 0.18%, 5/15/12 (b)(c) | | 50,000,000 | | 49,996,500 |
KfW, 0.23%, 7/16/12 (b)(c) | | 40,400,000 | | 40,380,384 |
Kookmin Bank, N.Y., 0.31%, 5/18/12 (b)(c) | | 50,000,000 | | 49,992,633 |
NRW Bank, 0.24%, 7/24/12 (b)(c) | | 100,000,000 | | 99,944,000 |
State Street Corp., 0.19%, 7/12/12 (b) | | 50,000,000 | | 49,981,000 |
Sumitomo Mitsui Bank, N.Y., | | | | |
0.37%, 6/1/12 (b)(c) | | 50,000,000 | | 49,984,070 |
| | | | 848,405,900 |
| | | | |
Diversified – 6.8% | | | | |
Caisse Centrale Desjardins, | | | | |
0.15%, 5/16/12 (b)(c) | | 25,000,000 | | 24,998,437 |
Caisse des Depots et Consignations, | | | | |
0.46%, 5/15/12 (b)(c) | | 50,000,000 | | 49,991,055 |
Caisse des Depots et Consignations, | | | | |
0.39%, 7/17/12 (b)(c) | | 30,000,000 | | 29,974,975 |
Credit Suisse, N.Y., 0.43%, 8/13/12 (b) | | 59,000,000 | | 58,926,709 |
Erste Abwicklungsanstalt, | | | | |
0.45%, 7/11/12 (b)(c) | | 25,000,000 | | 24,977,813 |
Nordea North America, Inc., | | | | |
0.26%, 5/7/12 (b) | | 25,000,000 | | 24,998,917 |
Nordea North America, Inc., | | | | |
0.19%, 6/5/12 (b) | | 49,000,000 | | 48,990,949 |
Nordea North America, Inc., | | | | |
0.58%, 8/10/12 (b) | | 70,000,000 | | 69,886,095 |
| | | | 332,744,950 |
|
Finance – 14.4% | | | | |
Antalis US Funding Corp., | | | | |
0.27%, 5/2/12 (b)(c) | | 24,000,000 | | 23,999,820 |
Barclays US Funding LLC, | | | | |
0.49%, 5/15/12 (b) | | 62,000,000 | | 61,988,185 |
Caisse d’Amortissement de la Dette | | | | |
Sociale, 0.84%, 6/7/12 (b)(c) | | 41,000,000 | | 40,964,603 |
Caisse d’Amortissement de la Dette | | | | |
Sociale, 0.49%, 6/22/12 (a) | | 55,000,000 | | 55,000,000 |
Caisse d’Amortissement de la Dette | | | | |
Sociale, 0.94%, 6/29/12 (b)(c) | | 24,000,000 | | 23,963,027 |
Caisse d’Amortissement de la Dette | | | | |
Sociale, 1.01%, 9/6/12 (b)(c) | | 35,000,000 | | 34,875,556 |
Caisse d’Amortissement de la Dette | | | | |
Sociale, 0.78%, 12/21/12 (b)(c) | | 50,000,000 | | 49,746,500 |
Deutsche Bank Financial LLC, | | | | |
0.38%, 6/1/12 (b) | | 30,000,000 | | 29,990,183 |
Deutsche Bank Financial LLC, | | | | |
0.57%, 6/27/12 (b) | | 110,000,000 | | 109,900,725 |
Deutsche Bank Financial LLC, | | | | |
0.40%, 7/17/12 (b) | | 25,000,000 | | 24,978,611 |
Gemini Securitization Corp. LLC, | | | | |
0.32%, 6/11/12 (b)(c) | | 25,000,000 | | 24,990,889 |
Mizuho Funding LLC, | | | | |
0.38%, 5/15/12 (b)(c) | | 40,000,000 | | 39,994,089 |
Mizuho Funding LLC, | | | | |
0.35%, 7/19/12 (b)(c) | | 60,000,000 | | 59,953,917 |
Old Line Funding LLC, | | | | |
0.14%, 5/1/12 (b)(c) | | 10,000,000 | | 10,000,000 |
Old Line Funding LLC, | | | | |
0.19%, 5/24/12 (b)(c) | | 7,500,000 | | 7,499,090 |
Rabobank USA Financial Corp., | | | | |
0.56%, 8/10/12 (b) | | 40,000,000 | | 39,937,156 |
Sanofi-Aventis, 0.19%, 5/10/12 (b)(c) | | 25,000,000 | | 24,998,813 |
UOB Funding LLC, 0.04%, 8/8/12 (b) | | 45,000,000 | | 44,946,787 |
| | | | 707,727,951 |
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER AND | | | | |
NOTES (COST $1,888,878,801) | | | | 1,888,878,801 |
18 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC PRIME MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Corporate Obligations – 6.6% |
| | Principal | | Amortized |
| | Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
Banking – 4.8% | | | | |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., | | | | |
Series BKNT, 0.50%, 10/18/12, | | | | |
Callable 6/18/12 @ 100 (d) | | 70,000,000 | | 70,000,000 |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., | | | | |
Series 1, 0.36%, 10/19/12, Callable | | | | |
6/21/12 @ 100 (a) | | 78,000,000 | | 78,000,000 |
Westpac Banking Corp., 0.39%, 10/3/12, | | | | |
Callable 6/12/12 @ 100 (a) | | 35,000,000 | | 35,000,000 |
Westpac Banking Corp., | | | | |
0.39%, 10/12/12 (a) | | 50,000,000 | | 50,000,000 |
| | | | 233,000,000 |
|
Finance – 1.8% | | | | |
General Electric Capital Corp., Series A, | | | | |
5.25%, 10/19/12, MTN | | 39,453,000 | | 40,336,730 |
Met Life Global Funding, Inc., | | | | |
0.59%, 7/6/12 (a) | | 50,000,000 | | 50,000,000 |
| | | | 90,336,730 |
TOTAL CORPORATE OBLIGATION | | | | |
(COST $323,336,730) | | | | 323,336,730 |
|
Yankee Dollars – 5.0% |
|
Banking – 0.5% | | | | |
Sumitomo Mitsui Bank, N.Y., | | | | |
0.36%, 5/15/12 (a) | | 25,000,000 | | 25,000,000 |
|
Commercial Banks – 4.0% | | | | |
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, | | | | |
2.75%, 10/15/12 | | 31,250,000 | | 31,572,444 |
National Australia Bank, N.Y., | | | | |
0.65%, 2/15/13 (a) | | 70,000,000 | | 70,000,000 |
Rabobank Nederland, N.Y., | | | | |
0.62%, 3/26/13 (a) | | 50,000,000 | | 50,000,000 |
Royal Bank of Canada, N.Y., | | | | |
0.53%, 3/4/13 (a) | | 45,000,000 | | 45,000,000 |
| | | | 196,572,444 |
|
Finance – 0.5% | | | | |
Export Development Canada, | | | | |
0.59%, 6/7/12 (a) | | 25,000,000 | | 25,011,415 |
|
TOTAL YANKEE DOLLARS | | | | |
(COST $246,583,859) | | | | 246,583,859 |
|
Variable Rate Demand Notes – 4.6% |
|
California – 0.9% | | | | |
Berkeley California Revenue, | | | | |
0.19%, 7/1/38, (LOC Wells Fargo | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 9,060,000 | | 9,060,000 |
California State Infrastructure & | | | | |
Economic Development Bank | | | | |
Revenue, 0.23%, 11/15/37, | | | | |
(LOC U.S. Bank N.A.) (a) | | 9,300,000 | | 9,300,000 |
Whittier California Health Facility | | | | |
Revenue, Series B, 0.20%, 6/1/36, | | | | |
(LOC U.S. Bank N.A.) (a) | | 24,700,000 | | 24,700,000 |
| | | | 43,060,000 |
| | | | |
Florida – 0.2% | | | | |
Jacksonville Florida Health Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series B, | | | | |
0.24%, 8/15/23, (LOC Branch Banking | | | | |
& Trust) (a) | | 8,745,000 | | 8,745,000 |
|
Idaho – 0.3% | | | | |
Power County Industrial Development | | | | |
Corp. Exempt Facilities Revenue, | | | | |
0.29%, 4/1/14, AMT, (LOC Wells Fargo | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 16,000,000 | | 16,000,000 |
|
Illinois – 0.5% | | | | |
Illinois Development Finance Authority | | | | |
Solid Waste Disposal Revenue, | | | | |
0.27%, 9/1/27, AMT, (LOC Wells Fargo | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 24,900,000 | | 24,900,000 |
|
Indiana – 0.3% | | | | |
Indiana State Finance Authority Hospital | | | | |
Revenue, Series D, 0.23%, 3/1/33, | | | | |
(LOC Northern Trust Co.) (a) | | 12,645,000 | | 12,645,000 |
|
Ohio – 0.5% | | | | |
Cleveland Ohio Economic & Community | | | | |
Development Revenue, 0.22%, 12/1/33, | | | | |
(LOC PNC Bank N.A.) (a) | | 8,665,000 | | 8,665,000 |
Ohio State Water Development | | | | |
Authority Revenue, 0.24%, 11/1/25, | | | | |
(LOC Northern Trust Co.) (a) | | 6,100,000 | | 6,100,000 |
Warren County Ohio Health Care | | | | |
Facilities Revenue, 0.25%, 7/1/31, | | | | |
(LOC U.S. Bank N.A.) (a) | | 9,200,000 | | 9,200,000 |
| | | | 23,965,000 |
|
Oregon – 0.3% | | | | |
Clackamas County Oregon Hospital | | | | |
Facility Authority Revenue, | | | | |
Series B, 0.22%, 6/1/37, (LOC U.S. | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 16,700,000 | | 16,700,000 |
|
Pennsylvania – 0.3% | | | | |
Bucks County Pennsylvania Industrial | | | | |
Development Authority Hospital | | | | |
Revenue, Series B, 0.24%, 7/1/39, | | | | |
(LOC PNC Bank N.A.) (a) | | 14,000,000 | | 14,000,000 |
|
South Carolina – 0.3% | | | | |
South Carolina State Housing Finance & | | | | |
Development Authority Multi-family | | | | |
Rental Housing Improvement Revenue, | | | | |
0.29%, 7/15/39, AMT, (LOC Wells | | | | |
Fargo Bank N.A.) (a) | | 17,250,000 | | 17,250,000 |
|
Texas – 0.8% | | | | |
San Antonio Empowerment Zone | | | | |
Development Corp. Contract Revenue, | | | | |
0.27%, 10/1/37, AMT, (LOC U.S. Bank | | | | |
N.A.) (a) | | 18,000,000 | | 18,000,000 |
Tarrant County Texas Cultural | | | | |
Educational Facilities Finance | | | | |
Corp. Hospital Revenue, Series E, | | | | |
0.22%, 11/15/50, (LOC Wells Fargo | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 19,400,000 | | 19,400,000 |
| | | | 37,400,000 |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 19 |
HSBC PRIME MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Variable Rate Demand Notes, continued |
| | Principal | | Amortized |
| | Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
Washington – 0.2% | | | | |
Washington State Health Care Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series B, | | | | |
0.23%, 8/15/44, (LOC Wells Fargo | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 8,650,000 | | 8,650,000 |
|
TOTAL VARIABLE RATE DEMAND | | | | |
NOTES (COST $223,315,000) | | | | 223,315,000 |
|
U.S. Treasury Obligations – 10.7% |
|
U.S. Treasury Notes – 10.7% | | | | |
0.63%, 6/30/12 | | 50,000,000 | | 50,032,508 |
1.38%, 9/15/12 | | 125,000,000 | | 125,563,386 |
1.38%, 10/15/12 | | 100,000,000 | | 100,557,213 |
0.38%, 10/31/12 | | 100,000,000 | | 100,101,139 |
0.63%, 12/31/12 | | 50,000,000 | | 50,155,258 |
0.75%, 3/31/13 | | 100,000,000 | | 100,471,576 |
|
TOTAL U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS | | | | |
(COST $526,881,080) | | | | 526,881,080 |
|
Repurchase Agreements – 8.1% |
|
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., purchased | | | | |
on 4/30/12, 0.20%, due on 5/1/12 with | | | | |
a maturity value of $350,001,944, | | | | |
collateralized by various U.S. | | | | |
Government and Government | | | | |
Agency Obligations, 2.12%-5.50%, | | | | |
6/1/35-12/1/41, fair value $357,000,001 | | 350,000,000 | | 350,000,000 |
Goldman Sachs, purchased on 4/30/12, | | | | |
0.20%, due on 5/1/12 with a maturity | | | | |
value of $50,000,278, collateralized by | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Obligation, 2.00%, 1/15/26, | | | | |
fair value $51,000,145 | | 50,000,000 | | 50,000,000 |
|
TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS | | | | |
(COST $400,000,000) | | | | 400,000,000 |
|
Time Deposits – 5.2% |
|
Barclays Capital Group Time Deposit, | | | | |
0.13%, 5/1/12 | | 106,000,000 | | 106,000,000 |
BNP Paribas, 0.14%, 5/1/12 | | 150,000,000 | | 150,000,000 |
|
TOTAL TIME DEPOSITS | | | | |
(COST $256,000,000) | | | | 256,000,000 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | | | |
(COST $4,914,996,185) — 100.0% | | | | 4,914,996,185 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $4,916,441,929. |
(a) | Variable rate security. The interest rates on these securities are adjusted periodically to reflect then-current short-term interest rates. The rates presented represent the rates in effect on April 30, 2012. The maturity dates presented reflect the final maturity dates. However, some of these securities may contain put or demand features that allow the Fund to require the issuer to repurchase the security from the fund within various time periods, including daily, weekly, monthly, or semi-annually. |
(b) | Rate presented represents the effective yield at time of purchase. |
(c) | Rule 144A security or other security which is restricted as to resale to institutional investors. This security has been deemed liquid by the Investment Adviser based on procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(d) | Step Bond. Income recognition is on the effective yield method for Step Bonds. |
AMT | — | Interest on security is subject to federal alternative minimum tax |
LLC | — | Limited Liability Company |
LOC | — | Letter of Credit |
MTN | — | Medium Term Note |
20 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC TAX-FREE MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Commercial Paper and Notes – 1.9% |
| | Principal | | Amortized |
| | Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
Wyoming – 1.9% | | | | |
Sweetwater County Wyoming Pollution | | | | |
Control Revenue, 0.18%, 5/3/12, | | | | |
(LOC Barclays Bank plc) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER AND | | | | |
NOTES (COST $2,000,000) | | | | 2,000,000 |
|
Variable Rate Demand Notes – 73.3% |
|
Alabama – 1.0% | | | | |
Mobile Alabama Industrial Development | | | | |
Board Dock & Wharf Revenue, Series A, | | | | |
0.29%, 6/1/32, (LOC Bayerische | | | | |
Landesbank) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
|
California – 8.7% | | | | |
ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit | | | | |
Corps. Multi-family Revenue, | | | | |
0.27%, 5/15/38, AMT, (Credit Support | | | | |
FNMA, LIQ FAC FNMA) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
Bay Area Toll Authority California | | | | |
Toll Bridge Revenue, Series E-1, | | | | |
0.21%, 4/1/45, (LOC Bank of Tokyo- | | | | |
Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
California State GO, Series A-2, | | | | |
0.23%, 5/1/33, (LOC Bank of | | | | |
Montreal) (a) | | 600,000 | | 600,000 |
California State Health Facilities | | | | |
Financing Authority Revenue, | | | | |
Series B, 0.22%, 9/1/38, (LOC U.S. | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
Chino Basin California Regional | | | | |
Financing Authority Revenue, Series B, | | | | |
0.26%, 6/1/32, (LOC Lloyds TSB | | | | |
Bank plc) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
Los Angeles County California | | | | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue, Series C-3, | | | | |
0.23%, 7/1/25, (LOC Sumitomo Mitsui | | | | |
Banking Corp.) (a) | | 1,500,000 | | 1,500,000 |
| | | | 9,100,000 |
|
Colorado – 2.5% | | | | |
Broomfield Colorado Urban Renewal | | | | |
Authority Tax Increment Revenue, | | | | |
1.10%, 12/1/30, (LOC BNP Paribas) (a) | | 645,000 | | 645,000 |
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority | | | | |
Multi-family Revenue, 0.24%, 2/15/28, | | | | |
(Credit Support FNMA, LIQ FAC | | | | |
FNMA) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
Pitkin County Colorado Industrial | | | | |
Development Revenue, Series B, | | | | |
0.26%, 4/1/14, AMT, (LOC JPMorgan | | | | |
Chase Bank) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
| | | | 2,645,000 |
| | | | |
Florida – 4.1% | | | | |
Florida State Gulf Coast University | | | | |
Financing Corp. Capital Improvement | | | | |
Revenue, Series B, 0.30%, 2/1/37, | | | | |
(LOC Bank of America N.A.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
Polk County Florida Industrial | | | | |
Development Authority Revenue, | | | | |
0.32%, 10/1/19, AMT, (LOC Branch | | | | |
Banking & Trust) (a) | | 2,250,000 | | 2,250,000 |
| | | | 4,250,000 |
|
Georgia – 6.3% | | | | |
Fulton County Georgia Development | | | | |
Authority Revenue, 0.25%, 5/1/26, | | | | |
(LOC Branch Banking & Trust) (a) | | 2,125,000 | | 2,125,000 |
Fulton County Residential Care Facilities | | | | |
Elderly Authority Revenue, | | | | |
Series C, 0.25%, 7/1/17, (LOC Bank | | | | |
of Scotland) (a) | | 1,400,000 | | 1,400,000 |
Gwinnett County Georgia Housing | | | | |
Authority Multi-family Housing | | | | |
Revenue, 0.25%, 6/15/25, (Credit | | | | |
Support FNMA, LIQ FAC FNMA) (a) | | 1,600,000 | | 1,600,000 |
Roswell Georgia Housing Authority | | | | |
Multi-family Revenue, 0.24%, 6/15/25, | | | | |
(Credit Support FNMA) (a) | | 1,400,000 | | 1,400,000 |
| | | | 6,525,000 |
|
Illinois – 2.4% | | | | |
Illinois Finance Authority Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.24%, 11/1/45, | | | | |
(LOC Northern Trust Co.) (a) | | 1,500,000 | | 1,500,000 |
Illinois State Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue, 0.23%, 4/1/31, | | | | |
(LOC PNC Bank N.A.) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
| | | | 2,500,000 |
|
Indiana – 5.6% | | | | |
Indiana State Finance Authority | | | | |
Environmental Revenue, Series A-5, | | | | |
0.24%, 10/1/40, (LOC Sumitomo Mitsui | | | | |
Banking Corp.) (a) | | 1,200,000 | | 1,200,000 |
Indiana State Finance Authority Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.24%, 7/1/36, (LOC Northern | | | | |
Trust Co.) (a) | | 900,000 | | 900,000 |
Lawrenceburg Indiana Pollution Control | | | | |
Revenue, 0.23%, 10/1/19, (LOC Bank of | | | | |
Nova Scotia) (a) | | 1,750,000 | | 1,750,000 |
Lawrenceburg Indiana Pollution Control | | | | |
Revenue, Series H, 0.25%, 11/1/21, | | | | |
(LOC Bank of Nova Scotia) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
| | | | 5,850,000 |
|
Kansas – 1.0% | | | | |
Olathe Kansas Industrial Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.38%, 3/1/27, AMT, (LOC | | | | |
Svenska Handelsbanken) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
|
Louisiana – 1.0% | | | | |
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Series B-1, 0.21%, 7/1/47, | | | | |
(LOC Bank of New York) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 21 |
HSBC TAX-FREE MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Variable Rate Demand Notes, continued |
| | Principal | | Amortized |
| | Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
Minnesota – 4.2% | | | | |
St. Paul Minnesota Port Authority | | | | |
District Cooling Revenue, Series 9-BB, | | | | |
0.26%, 3/1/29, (LOC Deutsche Bank | | | | |
A.G.) (a) | | 2,070,000 | | 2,070,000 |
St. Paul Minnesota Port Authority | | | | |
District Heating Revenue, Series 7-Q, | | | | |
0.26%, 12/1/28, (LOC Deutsche Bank | | | | |
A.G.) (a) | | 2,300,000 | | 2,300,000 |
| | | | 4,370,000 |
|
Missouri – 1.0% | | | | |
Missouri State Health & Educational | | | | |
Facilities Authority Revenue, | | | | |
Series B-2, 0.25%, 10/1/35, (LOC | | | | |
Bank of America N.A.) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
|
Nebraska – 0.9% | | | | |
Saline County Nebraska Hospital | | | | |
Authority No. 1 Hospital Revenue, | | | | |
Series C, 0.27%, 6/1/31, (LOC U.S. | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 985,000 | | 985,000 |
|
New Jersey – 1.4% | | | | |
New Jersey State Turnpike Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Series D, 1.00%, 1/1/18, | | | | |
(Credit Support NATL-RE FGIC, LOC | | | | |
Societe Generale) (a) | | 1,500,000 | | 1,500,000 |
|
New Mexico – 1.4% | | | | |
New Mexico Educational Assistance | | | | |
Foundation Revenue, Series A-1, | | | | |
0.26%, 4/1/34, AMT, (Credit Support | | | | |
Guaranteed Student Loans, LOC Royal | | | | |
Bank of Canada) (a) | | 1,500,000 | | 1,500,000 |
|
New York – 3.4% | | | | |
New York City GO, Sub-series G-4, | | | | |
0.23%, 4/1/42, (LOC PNC | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
New York State Energy Research & | | | | |
Development Authority Revenue, | | | | |
Sub-series A-2, 0.26%, 5/1/39, | | | | |
(LOC Mizuho Corporate Bank) (a) | | 1,500,000 | | 1,500,000 |
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority | | | | |
Revenue, Series B, 0.20%, 1/1/32, (LOC | | | | |
State Street Bank & Trust Co.) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
| | | | 3,500,000 |
|
North Carolina – 1.9% | | | | |
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital | | | | |
Authority North Carolina Health | | | | |
Care System Revenue, Series H, | | | | |
0.22%, 1/15/45, (LOC Wells Fargo | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
|
Ohio – 4.3% | | | | |
Cuyahoga County Ohio Hospital | | | | |
Revenue, 0.24%, 2/1/35, (LOC PNC | | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
Hamilton County Ohio Health Care | | | | |
Revenue, Series B, 0.26%, 1/1/37, | | | | |
(LOC PNC Bank N.A.) (a) | | 500,000 | | 500,000 |
Ohio State Air Quality Development | | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series C, | | | | |
0.24%, 2/1/26, (LOC Bank of Tokyo- | | | | |
Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
| | | | 4,500,000 |
|
Oregon – 2.2% | | | | |
Oregon State Business Development | | | | |
Commission Revenue, Series 230, | | | | |
0.32%, 4/1/41, AMT, (LOC U.S. Bank | | | | |
N.A.) (a) | | 2,300,000 | | 2,300,000 |
|
Pennsylvania – 4.9% | | | | |
Allegheny County Pennsylvania Industrial | | | | |
Development Authority Health Care | | | | |
Facilities Revenue, 0.25%, 12/1/41, | | | | |
(LOC PNC Bank N.A.) (a) | | 100,000 | | 100,000 |
Beaver County Pennsylvania Industrial | | | | |
Development Authority Revenue, | | | | |
Series B, 0.24%, 12/1/35, (LOC Citibank | | | | |
N.A., Guaranty Agreement FirstEnergy | | | | |
Solutions Corp.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
Haverford Township Pennsylvania School | | | | |
District GO, 0.26%, 3/1/30, (Credit | | | | |
Support State Aid Withholding, | | | | |
LOC TD Bank N.A.) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
Philadelphia Pennsylvania School District | | | | |
GO, Series F, 0.24%, 9/1/30, (Credit | | | | |
Support State Aid Withholding, | | | | |
LOC TD Bank N.A.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
| | | | 5,100,000 |
|
South Carolina – 1.1% | | | | |
South Carolina Jobs Economic | | | | |
Development Authority Revenue, | | | | |
0.25%, 3/1/23, (LOC Branch Banking & | | | | |
Trust) (a) | | 1,150,000 | | 1,150,000 |
|
Texas – 6.7% | | | | |
Austin Texas Airport System Revenue, | | | | |
Series A, 0.25%, 11/15/17, AMT, (LOC | | | | |
JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
Harris County Texas Hospital District | | | | |
Revenue, 0.25%, 2/15/42, (LOC | | | | |
JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
Houston Texas Utility System Revenue, | | | | |
Series B-2, 0.20%, 5/15/34, (LOC State | | | | |
Street Bank & Trust Co.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
Houston Texas Utility System Revenue, | | | | |
Series B-3, 0.23%, 5/15/34, (LOC | | | | |
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp.) (a) | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
Tarrant County Texas Cultural Education | | | | |
Facilities Finance Corp. Hospital | | | | |
Revenue, Series C, 0.25%, 11/15/50, | | | | |
(LOC Northern Trust Co.) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
| | | | 7,000,000 |
|
Utah – 1.9% | | | | |
Emery County Utah Pollution Control | | | | |
Revenue, 0.25%, 7/1/15, (LOC BNP | | | | |
Paribas) (a) | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
22 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC TAX-FREE MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Variable Rate Demand Notes, continued |
| Principal | | Amortized |
| Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
Virginia – 1.9% | | | |
Virginia State Commonwealth University | | | |
Health System Authority Revenue, | | | |
Series B, 0.25%, 7/1/30, (Credit | | | |
Support AMBAC, LOC Wachovia | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
|
Washington – 1.7% | | | |
Washington State Housing Finance | | | |
Commission Multi-family Housing | | | |
Revenue, 0.24%, 7/1/44, (Credit Support | | | |
FHLMC, LIQ FAC FHLMC) (a) | 1,800,000 | | 1,800,000 |
|
West Virginia – 1.0% | | | |
West Virginia State Hospital Finance | | | |
Authority Revenue, Series B, | | | |
0.24%, 6/1/41, (LOC JPMorgan Chase | | | |
Bank) (a) | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
|
Wisconsin – 0.8% | | | |
Wisconsin State Health & Educational | | | |
Facilities Authority Revenue, | | | |
0.27%, 2/1/38, (LOC BMO Harris | | | |
Bank N.A.) (a) | 805,000 | | 805,000 |
|
TOTAL VARIABLE RATE DEMAND | | | |
NOTES (COST $76,380,000) | | | 76,380,000 |
|
Municipal Bonds – 22.7% |
|
Alabama – 2.7% | | | |
Jefferson County Alabama Sewer Revenue, | | | |
Series D, 5.25%, 2/1/24, (Credit Support | | | |
FGIC), prerefunded 8/1/12 @ 100 | 1,870,000 | | 1,893,313 |
Jefferson County Alabama Sewer Revenue | | | |
Warrants, Series D, 5.00%, 2/1/42, | | | |
(Credit Support FGIC), Prerefunded | | | |
8/1/12 @ 100 | 880,000 | | 890,242 |
| | | 2,783,555 |
|
Arizona – 1.1% | | | |
Arizona State School Facilities Board | | | |
Certificates of Participation, Series A, | | | |
5.25%, 9/1/17, (Credit Support | | | |
NATL-RE), prerefunded 3/1/13 @ 100 | 1,080,000 | | 1,125,410 |
|
California – 1.0% | | | |
California State Department of Water | | | |
Resources Supply Revenue, Series A, | | | |
5.38%, 5/1/22, prerefunded 5/1/12 @ 101 | 1,000,000 | | 1,010,000 |
|
Florida – 1.2% | | | |
Lake County Florida School Board | | | |
Certificates of Participation, | | | |
5.38%, 7/1/15, (Credit Support AMBAC), | | | |
prerefunded 7/1/12 @ 100 | 1,200,000 | | 1,210,234 |
|
Georgia – 2.5% | | | |
Georgia Municipal Electric Authority | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 5.25%, 11/1/15, | | | |
(Credit Support NATL-RE), | | | |
prerefunded 11/1/12 @ 100 | 1,115,000 | | 1,143,082 |
Georgia State GO, Series B, 5.13%, 5/1/15, | | | |
prerefunded 5/1/12 @ 100 | 1,500,000 | | 1,500,000 |
| | | 2,643,082 |
| | | |
Illinois – 3.0% | | | |
Chicago Illinois Metropolitan Water | | | |
Reclamation District-Greater Chicago | | | |
GO, Series C, 5.38%, 12/1/15, | | | |
prerefunded 12/1/12 @ 100 | 1,500,000 | | 1,544,808 |
Chicago Illinois Metropolitan Water | | | |
Reclamation District-Greater Chicago | | | |
GO, Series C, 5.38%, 12/1/16, | | | |
prerefunded 12/1/12 @ 100 | 1,500,000 | | 1,545,294 |
| | | 3,090,102 |
|
Massachusetts – 0.3% | | | |
Massachusetts State Special Obligation | | | |
Revenue, Series A, 5.38%, 6/1/20, | | | |
(Credit Support FGIC), prerefunded | | | |
6/1/12 @ 100 | 300,000 | | 301,218 |
|
Michigan – 1.6% | | | |
Van Buren Township Michigan | | | |
Local Development Authority GO, | | | |
5.25%, 4/1/23, (Credit Support FGIC), | | | |
prerefunded 4/1/13 @ 100 | 500,000 | | 522,613 |
Ypsilanti Michigan Water Supply & | | | |
Sewage Disposal System Revenue, | | | |
Series C, 5.00%, 9/1/27, (Credit Support | | | |
AMBAC), prerefunded 9/1/12 @ 100 | 1,180,000 | | 1,199,180 |
| | | 1,721,793 |
|
Nevada – 1.0% | | | |
Clark County Nevada School District GO, | | | |
Series C, 5.00%, 6/15/21, (Credit Support | | | |
NATL-RE), prerefunded 6/15/12 @ 100 | 1,000,000 | | 1,005,831 |
|
New Jersey – 2.0% | | | |
New Jersey State Educational Facilities | | | |
Authority Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/17, | | | |
(Credit Support Radian), prerefunded | | | |
7/1/12 @ 100 | 1,000,000 | | 1,007,930 |
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | |
Revenue, 6.00%, 6/1/37, prerefunded | | | |
6/1/12 @ 100 | 1,100,000 | | 1,105,241 |
| | | 2,113,171 |
|
Ohio – 1.5% | | | |
Olentangy Local School District GO, | | | |
5.25%, 12/1/14, (Credit Support AGM, | | | |
Student Credit Program), prerefunded | | | |
6/1/12 @ 100 | 1,610,000 | | 1,616,843 |
|
Virginia – 1.8% | | | |
Hampton Virginia Convention Center | | | |
Revenue, 5.13%, 1/15/28, (Credit Support | | | |
AMBAC), prerefunded 1/15/13 @ 100 | 1,800,000 | | 1,861,997 |
|
Washington – 1.0% | | | |
Pierce County Washington School District | | | |
GO, 5.25%, 12/1/22, (Credit Support | | | |
NATL-RE FGIC, School Board Guaranty), | | | |
prerefunded 12/1/12 @ 100 | 1,000,000 | | 1,029,482 |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 23 |
HSBC TAX-FREE MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Municipal Bonds, continued |
|
| Principal | | Amortized |
| Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
Wisconsin – 2.0% | | | |
Badger Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp. | | | |
Revenue, 6.38%, 6/1/32, prerefunded | | | |
6/1/12 @ 100 | 1,070,000 | | 1,075,492 |
Wisconsin State Transportation Revenue, | | | |
Series 2, 5.13%, 7/1/22, (Credit Support | | | |
AMBAC), Prerefunded 7/1/12 @ 100 | 1,000,000 | | 1,008,190 |
| | | 2,083,682 |
|
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS | | | |
(COST $23,596,400) | | | 23,596,400 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | | |
(COST $101,976,400) — 97.9% | | | 101,976,400 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $104,132,451. |
(a) | | Variable rate security. The rate presented represents the rate in effect at April 30, 2012. These securities are deemed to have a maturity remaining until the next adjustment of the interest rate or the longer of the demand period or time to the next readjustment. |
AGM | — | Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation |
AMBAC | — | American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation |
AMT | — | Interest on security is subject to federal alternative minimum tax |
FGIC | — | Financial Guaranty Insurance Company |
FHLMC | — | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
FNMA | — | Federal National Mortgage Association |
GO | — | General Obligation |
LIQ FAC | — | Liquidity Facility |
LOC | — | Letter of Credit |
NATL-RE | — | Reinsurance provided by the National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation |
24 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC U.S. GOVERNMENT MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
U.S. Government and Government Agency Obligations – 19.9% |
| | Principal | | Amortized |
| | Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
Federal Farm Credit Bank – 10.4% | | | |
| 0.20%, 8/2/12 (a) | 30,000,000 | | 30,000,000 |
| 0.19%, 8/22/12 (a), Series 1 | 50,000,000 | | 49,997,607 |
| 0.21%, 9/20/12 (a), Series 1 | 50,000,000 | | 49,998,035 |
| 0.30%, 2/11/13 (a), Series 4 | 39,000,000 | | 39,037,079 |
| 0.18%, 3/8/13 (a) | 80,000,000 | | 79,993,089 |
| 0.25%, 3/28/13 (a), Series 1 | 40,000,000 | | 40,022,067 |
| 0.20%, 4/2/13 (a) | 108,500,000 | | 108,500,000 |
| 0.00%, 5/3/13 (a) | 150,000,000 | | 150,000,000 |
| | | | 547,547,877 |
| |
Federal Home Loan Bank – 5.7% | | | |
| 0.25%, 6/22/12 | 23,885,000 | | 23,885,000 |
| 0.25%, 6/27/12 | 30,000,000 | | 30,000,000 |
| 0.15%, 8/30/12, Callable | | | |
| 5/16/12 @ 100 | 75,000,000 | | 75,000,000 |
| 0.25%, 1/8/13, Callable | | | |
| 9/27/12 @ 100 | 25,000,000 | | 25,000,000 |
| 0.30%, 3/27/13, Callable | | | |
| 6/15/12 @ 100 | 50,000,000 | | 50,000,000 |
| 0.26%, 4/10/13 | 92,400,000 | | 92,391,292 |
| | | | 296,276,292 |
| |
Federal National Mortgage Association – 3.8% | | |
| 0.26%, 8/23/12 (a) | 60,605,000 | | 60,615,506 |
| 0.27%, 9/17/12 (a) | 50,000,000 | | 50,012,539 |
| 0.24%, 3/14/13 (a) | 82,750,000 | | 82,771,305 |
| | | | 193,399,350 |
TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT | | | |
| AND GOVERNMENT | | | |
| AGENCY OBLIGATIONS | | | |
| (COST $1,037,223,519) | | | 1,037,223,519 |
| |
U.S. Treasury Obligations – 14.2% | | | |
| |
U.S. Treasury Notes – 14.2% | | | |
| 1.75%, 8/15/12 | 50,000,000 | | 50,233,418 |
| 4.13%, 8/31/12 | 50,000,000 | | 50,664,971 |
| 4.00%, 11/15/12 | 75,000,000 | | 76,544,364 |
| 0.50%, 11/30/12 | 75,000,000 | | 75,139,291 |
| 3.38%, 11/30/12 | 10,000,000 | | 10,187,740 |
| 0.63%, 12/31/12 | 50,000,000 | | 50,155,587 |
| 0.63%, 2/28/13 | 100,000,000 | | 100,365,354 |
| 1.38%, 3/15/13 | 50,000,000 | | 50,508,460 |
| 0.75%, 3/31/13 | 175,000,000 | | 175,844,434 |
| 1.75%, 4/15/13 | 50,000,000 | | 50,722,362 |
| 3.13%, 4/30/13 | 50,000,000 | | 51,446,006 |
TOTAL U.S. TREASURY | | | |
| OBLIGATIONS | | | |
| (COST $741,811,987) | | | 741,811,987 |
| |
Repurchase Agreements – 68.7% | | | |
| |
Bank of America Corp., purchased on | | | |
| 4/30/12, 0.19%, due on 5/1/12 with | | | |
| a maturity value of $400,002,111, | | | |
| collateralized by various U.S. | | | |
| Government and Government | | | |
| Agency Obligations, 0.00%-4.50%, | | | |
| 5/1/26-4/1/42, fair value | | | |
| $408,000,000 | 400,000,000 | | 400,000,000 |
Barclays Capital Group, purchased on | | | |
| 4/26/12, 0.14%, due on 5/3/12 with | | | |
| a maturity value of $225,006,125, | | | |
| collateralized by various U.S. | | | |
| Government and Government | | | |
| Agency Obligations, 0.00%-8.25%, | | | |
| 5/14/12-9/15/60, fair value | | | |
| $229,500,717 | 225,000,000 | | 225,000,000 |
Barclays Capital Group, purchased on | | | |
| 4/30/12, 0.19%, due on 5/1/12 with | | | |
| a maturity value of $550,002,903, | | | |
| collateralized by various U.S. | | | |
| Government and Government | | | |
| Agency Obligations, 3.50%-4.00%, | | | |
| 12/1/25-2/1/42, fair value | | | |
| $561,000,000 | 550,000,000 | | 550,000,000 |
Barclays Capital Group, purchased on | | | |
| 4/30/12, 0.20%, due on 5/1/12 with | | | |
| a maturity value of $75,000,417, | | | |
| collateralized by various U.S. | | | |
| Treasury Obligations, 0.41%-3.25%, | | | |
| 5/8/12-12/28/12, fair value | | | |
| $76,500,000 | 75,000,000 | | 75,000,000 |
BNP Paribas, purchased on 4/30/12, | | | |
| 0.19%, due on 5/7/12 with a maturity | | | |
| value of $250,009,236, collateralized | | | |
| by various U.S. Government and | | | |
| Government Agency Obligations, | | | |
| 1.63%-6.14%, 1/1/16-5/1/42, fair | | | |
| value $255,000,000 | 250,000,000 | | 250,000,000 |
BNP Paribas, purchased on 4/30/12, | | | |
| 0.21%, due on 5/1/12 with a maturity | | | |
| value of $400,002,333, collateralized | | | |
| by various U.S. Government and | | | |
| Government Agency Obligations, | | | |
| 5.50%-6.00%, 5/15/24-10/15/40, fair | | | |
| value $408,000,001 | 400,000,000 | | 400,000,000 |
Citigroup Global Markets, purchased | | | |
| on 4/30/12, 0.20%, due on | | | |
| 5/1/12 with a maturity value of | | | |
| $300,001,667, collateralized by | | | |
| various U.S. Government and | | | |
| Government Agency Obligations, | | | |
| 0.82%-6.50%, 7/1/18-12/1/41, fair | | | |
| value $306,000,001 | 300,000,000 | | 300,000,000 |
Deutsche Bank, purchased on 4/30/12, | | | |
| 0.21%, due on 5/1/12 with a maturity | | | |
| value of $400,002,333, collateralized | | | |
| by various U.S. Government and | | | |
| Government Agency Obligations, | | | |
| 3.50%, 1/20/42-4/15/42, fair value | | | |
| $408,000,001 | 400,000,000 | | 400,000,000 |
Goldman Sachs, purchased on | | | |
| 4/30/12, 0.20%, due on 5/1/12 with | | | |
| a maturity value of $485,002,694, | | | |
| collateralized by various U.S. | | | |
| Treasury Obligations, 1.88%-2.63%, | | | |
| 5/7/12-1/15/26, fair value | | | |
| $494,700,079 | 485,000,000 | | 485,000,000 |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 25 |
HSBC U.S. GOVERNMENT MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Repurchase Agreements, continued | | |
| Principal | | Amortized |
| Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., | | | |
purchased on 4/30/12, 0.18%, due | | | |
on 5/1/12 with a maturity value of | | | |
$200,001,000, collateralized by | | | |
various U.S. Treasury Obligations, | | | |
2.13%-2.63%, 4/30/18-8/15/21, fair | | | |
value $204,003,616 | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., | | | |
purchased on 4/30/12, 0.20%, due | | | |
on 5/1/12 with a maturity value | | | |
of $300,001,667, collateralized | | | |
by various U.S. Government and | | | |
Government Agency Obligations, | | | |
3.00%-7.50%, 7/1/14-5/1/42, fair | | | |
value $306,004,336 | 300,000,000 | | 300,000,000 |
|
TOTAL REPURCHASE | | | |
AGREEMENTS | | | |
(COST $3,585,000,000) | | | 3,585,000,000 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | | |
(COST $5,364,035,506) — 102.8%. | | | 5,364,035,506 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $5,219,290,996. |
(a) | | Variable rate security. The rate presented represents the rate in effect at April 30, 2012. These securities are deemed to have a maturity remaining until the next adjustment of the interest rate or the longer of the demand period or time to the next readjustment. |
26 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC U.S. TREASURY MONEY MARKET FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
U.S. Treasury Obligations – 96.0% | | | |
| Principal | | Amortized |
| Amount ($) | | Cost ($) |
U.S. Treasury Bills – 73.4% | | | |
0.06%, 5/3/12 (a) | 225,000,000 | | 224,999,290 |
0.05%, 5/10/12 (a) | 210,000,000 | | 209,997,262 |
0.06%, 5/17/12 (a) | 525,000,000 | | 524,984,589 |
0.07%, 5/24/12 (a) | 375,000,000 | | 374,982,592 |
0.10%, 6/14/12 (a) | 200,000,000 | | 199,976,168 |
| | | 1,534,939,901 |
|
U.S. Treasury Notes – 22.6% | | | |
1.88%, 6/15/12 | 100,000,000 | | 100,218,959 |
0.63%, 7/31/12 | 25,000,000 | | 25,033,256 |
1.38%, 9/15/12 | 100,000,000 | | 100,451,287 |
0.38%, 10/31/12 | 35,000,000 | | 35,040,623 |
4.00%, 11/15/12 | 25,000,000 | | 25,514,080 |
3.38%, 11/30/12 | 40,000,000 | | 40,751,167 |
0.63%, 12/31/12 | 50,000,000 | | 50,154,081 |
1.38%, 1/15/13 | 25,000,000 | | 25,214,147 |
0.63%, 1/31/13 | 20,000,000 | | 20,063,570 |
3.88%, 2/15/13 | 25,000,000 | | 25,732,699 |
3.13%, 4/30/13 | 25,000,000 | | 25,718,265 |
| | | 473,892,134 |
|
TOTAL U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS (COST $2,008,832,035) | | | 2,008,832,035 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES — 96.0% | | | 2,008,832,035 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $2,093,314,904. |
(a) | | Discount note. Rate presented represents the effective yield at time of purchase. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 27 |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| New York | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax-Free | | Prime | | Tax-Free |
| Money Market | | Money Market | | Money Market |
| Fund | | Fund | | Fund |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at value and amortized cost | | $ | 313,421,928 | | | | $ | 4,514,996,185 | | | | $ | 101,976,400 | |
Repurchase agreements, at value and cost | | | — | | | | | 400,000,000 | | | | | — | |
Total Investments | | | 313,421,928 | | | | | 4,914,996,185 | | | | | 101,976,400 | |
Cash | | | — | | | | | 935,782 | | | | | 1,661,626 | |
Interest and dividends receivable | | | 1,288,042 | | | | | 1,516,403 | | | | | 460,273 | |
Receivable for capital shares issued | | | — | | | | | 214,000 | | | | | — | |
Receivable from Investment Adviser | | | 4,955 | | | | | — | | | | | 5,713 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 29,562 | | | | | 81,778 | | | | | 41,831 | |
Total Assets | | | 314,744,487 | | | | | 4,917,744,148 | | | | | 104,145,843 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash overdraft | | | 504,869 | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Dividends payable | | | — | | | | | 415,767 | | | | | — | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | — | | | | | 426,319 | | | | | — | |
Administration | | | 16,397 | | | | | 227,696 | | | | | 4,910 | |
Distribution | | | — | | | | | 1 | | | | | — | |
Shareholder Servicing | | | — | | | | | 17,729 | | | | | 316 | |
Compliance Service | | | 35 | | | | | 3,318 | | | | | 126 | |
Accounting | | | 307 | | | | | 1,849 | | | | | 1,166 | |
Custodian | | | 741 | | | | | 3,524 | | | | | 276 | |
Transfer Agent | | | 2,090 | | | | | 4,167 | | | | | 2,889 | |
Trustee | | | 2,466 | | | | | 4,563 | | | | | 216 | |
Other | | | 25,878 | | | | | 197,286 | | | | | 3,493 | |
Total Liabilities | | | 552,783 | | | | | 1,302,219 | | | | | 13,392 | |
Net Assets | | $ | 314,191,704 | | | | $ | 4,916,441,929 | | | | $ | 104,132,451 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Composition of Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital | | | 314,191,703 | | | | | 4,916,439,426 | | | | | 104,132,450 | |
Undistributed (distributions in excess of ) net investment income | | | 1 | | | | | — | | | | | 1 | |
Accumulated net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | — | | | | | 2,503 | | | | | — | |
Net Assets | | $ | 314,191,704 | | | | $ | 4,916,441,929 | | | | $ | 104,132,451 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | $ | 195,634 | | | | $ | 31,051,852 | | | | $ | — | |
Class B Shares | | | — | | | | | 71,108 | | | | | — | |
Class C Shares | | | — | | | | | 6,162 | | | | | — | |
Class D Shares | | | 195,101,149 | | | | | 1,271,490,656 | | | | | 79,198,117 | |
Class I Shares | | | — | | | | | 3,020,983,318 | | | | | — | |
Class Y Shares | | | 118,894,921 | | | | | 592,838,833 | | | | | 24,934,334 | |
| | $ | 314,191,704 | | | | $ | 4,916,441,929 | | | | $ | 104,132,451 | |
Shares Outstanding | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($0.001 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | 195,634 | | | | | 31,052,394 | | | | | — | |
Class B Shares | | | — | | | | | 71,137 | | | | | — | |
Class C Shares | | | — | | | | | 6,161 | | | | | — | |
Class D Shares | | | 195,104,640 | | | | | 1,271,430,124 | | | | | 79,196,272 | |
Class I Shares | | | — | | | | | 3,021,060,707 | | | | | — | |
Class Y Shares | | | 118,897,983 | | | | | 592,833,129 | | | | | 24,935,811 | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | — | |
Class B Shares(a) | | $ | — | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | — | |
Class C Shares(a) | | $ | — | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | — | |
Class D Shares | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | 1.00 | |
Class I Shares | | $ | — | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | — | |
Class Y Shares | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | 1.00 | |
____________________
(a) Redemption Price per share varies by length of time shares are held.
28 | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
| U.S. | | | | | |
| Government | | U.S. Treasury |
| Money Market | | Money Market |
| Fund | | Fund |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at value and amortized cost | | $ | 1,779,035,506 | | | | $ | 2,008,832,035 | |
Repurchase agreements, at value and cost | | | 3,585,000,000 | | | | | — | |
Total Investments | | | 5,364,035,506 | | | | | 2,008,832,035 | |
Cash | | | 2,844,409 | | | | | 81,998,912 | |
Interest and dividends receivable | | | 2,924,602 | | | | | 2,389,306 | |
Receivable for capital shares issued | | | 40,542 | | | | | — | |
Receivable from Investment Adviser | | | — | | | | | 309,722 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 58,007 | | | | | 37,292 | |
Total Assets | | | 5,369,903,066 | | | | | 2,093,567,267 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends payable | | | 49,812 | | | | | — | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | 150,000,000 | | | | | — | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | 142,778 | | | | | — | |
Administration | | | 205,912 | | | | | 74,550 | |
Compliance Service | | | 2,707 | | | | | 782 | |
Custodian | | | 4,147 | | | | | 2,825 | |
Transfer Agent | | | 2,990 | | | | | 2,988 | |
Trustee | | | 3,396 | | | | | 5,938 | |
Other | | | 200,328 | | | | | 165,280 | |
Total Liabilities | | | 150,612,070 | | | | | 252,363 | |
Net Assets | | $ | 5,219,290,996 | | | | $ | 2,093,314,904 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Composition of Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Capital | | | 5,219,292,527 | | | | | 2,093,333,546 | |
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income | | | 2 | | | | | 9 | |
Accumulated net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | (1,533 | ) | | | | (18,651 | ) |
Net Assets | | $ | 5,219,290,996 | | | | $ | 2,093,314,904 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | $ | 1,781,303 | | | | $ | 5,099 | |
Class B Shares | | | 76,379 | | | | | 35,412 | |
Class D Shares | | | 604,319,961 | | | | | 519,686,932 | |
Class I Shares | | | 2,025,259,888 | | | | | 432,143,510 | |
Class Y Shares | | | 2,587,853,465 | | | | | 1,141,443,951 | |
| | $ | 5,219,290,996 | | | | $ | 2,093,314,904 | |
Shares Outstanding | | | | | | | | | |
($0.001 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized): | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | 1,779,924 | | | | | 5,091 | |
Class B Shares | | | 76,367 | | | | | 35,412 | |
Class D Shares | | | 604,138,477 | | | | | 519,688,046 | |
Class I Shares | | | 2,025,381,775 | | | | | 432,178,377 | |
Class Y Shares | | | 2,587,916,344 | | | | | 1,141,431,597 | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | 1.00 | |
Class B Shares(a) | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | 1.00 | |
Class D Shares | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | 1.00 | |
Class I Shares | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | 1.00 | |
Class Y Shares | | $ | 1.00 | | | | $ | 1.00 | |
____________________
(a) Redemption Price per share varies by length of time shares are held.
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 29 |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Operations—For the six months ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| New York | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax-Free | | Prime | | Tax-Free |
| Money Market | | Money Market | | Money Market |
| Fund | | Fund | | Fund |
Investment Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 304,729 | | | | $ | 9,309,991 | | | | $ | 129,849 | |
Dividends | | | 22 | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Total Investment Income | | | 304,751 | | | | | 9,309,991 | | | | | 129,849 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | 197,464 | | | | | 3,185,827 | | | | | 69,217 | |
Advisory Services: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operational Support — Class A Shares | | | 58 | | | | | 14,337 | | | | | — | |
Operational Support — Class B Shares | | | — | | | | | 39 | | | | | — | |
Operational Support — Class C Shares | | | — | | | | | 4 | | | | | — | |
Operational Support — Class D Shares | | | 68,438 | | | | | 751,996 | | | | | 52,418 | |
Operational Support — Class Y Shares | | | 30,238 | | | | | 327,721 | | | | | 16,799 | |
Administration: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | 57 | | | | | 7,093 | | | | | — | |
Class B Shares | | | — | | | | | 20 | | | | | — | |
Class D Shares | | | 70,026 | | | | | 370,328 | | | | | 25,816 | |
Class I Shares | | | — | | | | | 1,029,643 | | | | | — | |
Class Y Shares | | | 30,525 | | | | | 161,690 | | | | | 8,266 | |
Distribution: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares | | | — | | | | | 297 | | | | | — | |
Class C Shares | | | — | | | | | 23 | | | | | — | |
Shareholder Servicing: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | 460 | | | | | 57,353 | | | | | — | |
Class B Shares | | | — | | | | | 99 | | | | | — | |
Class C Shares | | | — | | | | | 7 | | | | | — | |
Class D Shares | | | 342,188 | | | | | 1,880,666 | | | | | 131,047 | |
Accounting | | | 34,902 | | | | | 40,752 | | | | | 39,646 | |
Compliance Service | | | 4,679 | | | | | 61,770 | | | | | 1,262 | |
Custodian | | | 11,056 | | | | | 155,437 | | | | | 5,526 | |
Printing | | | 11,676 | | | | | 152,223 | | | | | 2,645 | |
Transfer Agent | | | 16,579 | | | | | 31,563 | | | | | 14,281 | |
Trustee | | | 13,584 | | | | | 196,141 | | | | | 4,110 | |
Registration fees | | | 26,654 | | | | | 51,668 | | | | | 31,948 | |
Other | | | 43,960 | | | | | 628,953 | | | | | 17,759 | |
Total expenses before fee reductions | | | 902,544 | | | | | 9,105,650 | | | | | 420,740 | |
Fees voluntarily reduced by Investment Adviser | | | (237,073 | ) | | | | (583,988 | ) | | | | (160,362 | ) |
Fees voluntarily reduced by Administrator | | | (18,072 | ) | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Fees voluntarily reduced by Distributor | | | — | | | | | (317 | ) | | | | — | |
Fees voluntarily reduced by Shareholder Servicing Agent | | | (342,648 | ) | | | | (1,893,200 | ) | | | | (130,008 | ) |
Fees paid indirectly | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | (521 | ) |
Net Expenses | | | 304,751 | | | | | 6,628,145 | | | | | 129,849 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income (Loss) | | | — | | | | | 2,681,846 | | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | — | | | | | 15,883 | | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change In Net Assets Resulting From Operations | | $ | — | | | | $ | 2,697,729 | | | | $ | — | |
30 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Operations—For the six months ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
| U.S. | | | | | |
| Government | | U.S. Treasury |
| Money Market | | Money Market |
| Fund | | Fund |
Investment Income: | | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 3,523,499 | | | | $ | 722,463 | |
Total Investment Income | | | 3,523,499 | | | | | 722,463 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | 2,330,414 | | | | | 1,181,536 | |
Advisory Services: | | | | | | | | | |
Operational Support — Class A Shares | | | 1,280 | | | | | 64 | |
Operational Support — Class B Shares | | | 46 | | | | | 18 | |
Operational Support — Class C Shares | | | — | | | | | 1 | |
Operational Support — Class D Shares | | | 344,593 | | | | | 294,792 | |
Operational Support — Class Y Shares | | | 1,046,629 | | | | | 535,616 | |
Administration: | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | 630 | | | | | 30 | |
Class B Shares | | | 22 | | | | | 8 | |
Class C Shares | | | — | | | | | 1 | |
Class D Shares | | | 170,179 | | | | | 145,420 | |
Class I Shares | | | 465,500 | | | | | 173,010 | |
Class Y Shares | | | 519,835 | | | | | 265,280 | |
Distribution: | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares | | | 341 | | | | | 133 | |
Class C Shares | | | — | | | | | 19 | |
Shareholder Servicing: | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | 5,119 | | | | | 256 | |
Class B Shares | | | 113 | | | | | 44 | |
Class C Shares | | | — | | | | | 3 | |
Class D Shares | | | 861,494 | | | | | 736,989 | |
Accounting | | | 33,990 | | | | | 32,900 | |
Compliance Service | | | 42,617 | | | | | 24,410 | |
Custodian | | | 120,719 | | | | | 47,832 | |
Printing | | | 83,916 | | | | | 41,968 | |
Transfer Agent | | | 25,435 | | | | | 21,028 | |
Trustee | | | 142,295 | | | | | 78,118 | |
Registration fees | | | 36,534 | | | | | 23,974 | |
Other | | | 448,553 | | | | | 261,830 | |
Total expenses before fee reductions | | | 6,680,254 | | | | | 3,865,280 | |
Fees voluntarily reduced by Investment Adviser | | | (2,255,246 | ) | | | | (2,206,552 | ) |
Fees voluntarily reduced by Administrator | | | (265,133 | ) | | | | (159,738 | ) |
Fees voluntarily reduced by Distributor | | | (341 | ) | | | | (142 | ) |
Fees voluntarily reduced by Shareholder Servicing Agent | | | (866,726 | ) | | | | (737,292 | ) |
Fees paid indirectly | | | (12,415 | ) | | | | (39,102 | ) |
Net Expenses | | | 3,280,393 | | | | | 722,454 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income | | | 243,106 | | | | | 9 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | 4,273 | | | | | 1,241 | |
Change In Net Assets Resulting From Operations | | $ | 247,379 | | | | $ | 1,250 | |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 31 |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| New York Tax-Free | | Prime |
| Money Market Fund | | Money Market Fund |
| For the | | For the | | For the | | For the |
| six months ended | | year ended | | six months ended | | year ended |
| April 30, 2012 | | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | | October 31, 2011 |
| (Unaudited) | | | | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | | |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | $ | — | | | | $ | 40,079 | | | | $ | 2,681,846 | | | | $ | 5,030,518 | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 15,883 | | | | | 186,929 | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | — | | | | | 40,079 | | | | | 2,697,729 | | | | | 5,217,447 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | — | | | | | (104 | ) | | | | (1,439 | ) | | | | (2,420 | ) |
Class B Shares | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | (4 | ) | | | | (18 | ) |
Class C Shares | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | (2 | ) | | | | (8 | ) |
Class D Shares | | | — | | | | | (29,578 | ) | | | | (75,504 | ) | | | | (174,840 | ) |
Class I Shares | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | (2,551,253 | ) | | | | (4,730,216 | ) |
Class Y Shares | | | — | | | | | (10,398 | ) | | | | (53,644 | ) | | | | (126,895 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
shareholder dividends | | | — | | | | | (40,080 | ) | | | | (2,681,846 | ) | | | | (5,034,397 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
capital transactions | | | (213,855,498 | ) | | | | 27,291,715 | | | | | (1,654,723,767 | ) | | | | (944,671,396 | ) |
Change in net assets | | | (213,855,498 | ) | | | | 27,291,714 | | | | | (1,654,707,884 | ) | | | | (944,488,346 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 528,047,202 | | | | | 500,755,488 | | | | | 6,571,149,813 | | | | | 7,515,638,159 | |
End of period | | $ | 314,191,704 | | | | $ | 528,047,202 | | | | $ | 4,916,441,929 | | | | $ | 6,571,149,813 | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | $ | 1 | | | | $ | 1 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 1 | |
32 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| New York Tax-Free | | Prime |
| Money Market Fund | | Money Market Fund |
| For the | | For the | | For the | | For the |
| six months ended | | year ended | | six months ended | | year ended |
| April 30, 2012 | | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | | October 31, 2011 |
| (Unaudited) | | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | |
CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | $ | 150,000 | | | | $ | 2,560,641 | | | | $ | 4,337,149 | | | | $ | 35,520,209 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | | 100 | | | | | 52 | | | | | 127 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (150,000 | ) | | | | (16,927,984 | ) | | | | (1,048,025 | ) | | | | (40,700,451 | ) |
Class A Shares capital transactions | | | — | | | | | (14,367,243 | ) | | | | 3,289,176 | | | | | (5,180,115 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 19,430 | | | | | 21,964 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 4 | | | | | 13 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | (80,190 | ) | | | | (115,996 | ) |
Class B Shares capital transactions | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | (60,756 | ) | | | | (94,019 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 373 | | | | | 148,117 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 2 | | | | | 8 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | (186,363 | ) |
Class C Shares capital transactions | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 375 | | | | | (38,238 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class D Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | 364,021,776 | | | | | 1,089,562,960 | | | | | 3,076,697,150 | | | | | 6,469,859,849 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | | 22,219 | | | | | 63,114 | | | | | 136,446 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (588,968,611 | ) | | | | (1,050,431,214 | ) | | | | (3,396,887,468 | ) | | | | (6,574,729,064 | ) |
Class D Shares capital transactions | | | (224,946,835 | ) | | | | 39,153,965 | | | | | (320,127,204 | ) | | | | (104,732,769 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 20,441,179,193 | | | | | 42,931,122,838 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 1,306,178 | | | | | 2,548,860 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | (21,730,858,359 | ) | | | | (43,303,107,094 | ) |
Class I Shares capital transactions | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | (1,288,372,988 | ) | | | | (369,435,396 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | 214,323,273 | | | | | 611,549,903 | | | | | 1,021,734,630 | | | | | 2,135,069,470 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | | 7,717 | | | | | 47,726 | | | | | 117,129 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (203,231,936 | ) | | | | (609,052,627 | ) | | | | (1,071,234,726 | ) | | | | (2,600,377,458 | ) |
Class Y Shares capital transactions | | | 11,091,337 | | | | | 2,504,993 | | | | | (49,452,370 | ) | | | | (465,190,859 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
capital transactions | | $ | (213,855,498 | ) | | | $ | 27,291,715 | | | | $ | (1,654,723,767 | ) | | | $ | (944,671,396 | ) |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 33 |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| Tax-Free | | U.S. Government |
| Money Market Fund | | Money Market Fund |
| For the | For the | | For the | For the |
| six months ended | year ended | | six months ended | year ended |
| April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 |
| (Unaudited) | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | $ | — | | | $ | 11,489 | | | | $ | 243,106 | | | $ | 1,248,618 | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 4,273 | | | | 220,254 | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | — | | | | 11,489 | | | | | 247,379 | | | | 1,468,872 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (127 | ) | | | (869 | ) |
Class B Shares | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (4 | ) | | | (8 | ) |
Class D Shares | | | — | | | | (6,019 | ) | | | | (34,446 | ) | | | (79,461 | ) |
Class I Shares | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (103,840 | ) | | | (886,348 | ) |
Class Y Shares | | | — | | | | (5,469 | ) | | | | (104,689 | ) | | | (282,432 | ) |
Net realized gains: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (35 | ) | | | — | |
Class B Shares | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (1 | ) | | | — | |
Class D Shares | | | — | | | | (1,194 | ) | | | | (7,445 | ) | | | — | |
Class I Shares | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (19,650 | ) | | | — | |
Class Y Shares | | | — | | | | (585 | ) | | | | (18,416 | ) | | | — | |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
shareholder dividends | | | — | | | | (13,267 | ) | | | | (288,653 | ) | | | (1,249,118 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
capital transactions | | | (16,486,571 | ) | | | 15,452,934 | | | | | 1,111,624,516 | | | | (4,860,273,121 | ) |
Change in net assets | | | (16,486,571 | ) | | | 15,451,156 | | | | | 1,111,583,242 | | | | (4,860,053,367 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 120,619,022 | | | | 105,167,866 | | | | | 4,107,707,754 | | | | 8,967,761,121 | |
End of period | | $ | 104,132,451 | | | $ | 120,619,022 | | | | $ | 5,219,290,996 | | | $ | 4,107,707,754 | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | |
34 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| Tax-Free | | U.S. Government |
| Money Market Fund | | Money Market Fund |
| For the | For the | | For the | For the |
| six months ended | year ended | | six months ended | year ended |
| April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | | April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 |
| (Unaudited) | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | |
CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 795,182 | | | $ | 31,276,415 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 9 | | | | 79 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | — | | | | (255 | ) | | | | (3,009,286 | ) | | | (53,208,562 | ) |
Class A Shares capital transactions | | | — | | | | (255 | ) | | | | (2,214,095 | ) | | | (21,932,068 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | — | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | 72,864 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 5 | | | | 8 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (17,135 | ) | | | (67,324 | ) |
Class B Shares capital transactions | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (17,130 | ) | | | 5,548 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | — | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | (3 | ) |
Class C Shares capital transactions | | | — | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | (3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class D Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | 149,424,026 | | | | 217,131,493 | | | | | 1,170,405,759 | | | | 3,459,519,344 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | 2,418 | | | | | 24,844 | | | | 50,828 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (150,188,532 | ) | | | (211,158,639 | ) | | | | (1,312,561,964 | ) | | | (3,635,390,571 | ) |
Class D Shares capital transactions | | | (764,506 | ) | | | 5,975,272 | | | | | (142,131,361 | ) | | | (175,820,399 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 9,345,968,631 | | | | 24,356,407,905 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 90,077 | | | | 640,334 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | — | | | | — | | | | | (8,966,544,294 | ) | | | (27,812,865,292 | ) |
Class I Shares capital transactions | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 379,514,414 | | | | (3,455,817,053 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | 75,330,650 | | | | 213,868,994 | | | | | 7,539,852,962 | | | | 18,153,063,238 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | 900 | | | | | 121,964 | | | | 276,177 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (91,052,715 | ) | | | (204,391,977 | ) | | | | (6,663,502,238 | ) | | | (19,360,048,561 | ) |
Class Y Shares capital transactions | | | (15,722,065 | ) | | | 9,477,917 | | | | | 876,472,688 | | | | (1,206,709,146 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
capital transactions | | $ | (16,486,571 | ) | | $ | 15,452,934 | | | | $ | 1,111,624,516 | | | $ | (4,860,273,121 | ) |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 35 |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund |
| For the six months ended April 30, 2012 | For the year ended October 31, 2011 |
| (Unaudited) | | | | |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 276,251 | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | 1,241 | | | | 4,376 | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | 1,250 | | | | 280,627 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Dividends: | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income: | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | — | | | | (212 | ) |
Class B Shares | | | — | | | | (5 | ) |
Class D Shares | | | — | | | | (73,082 | ) |
Class I Shares | | | — | | | | (108,964 | ) |
Class Y Shares | | | — | | | | (93,694 | ) |
Net realized gains: | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | — | | | | (2 | ) |
Class B Shares | | | — | | | | (1 | ) |
Class D Shares | | | (6,485 | ) | | | (8,821 | ) |
Class I Shares | | | (6,826 | ) | | | (22,434 | ) |
Class Y Shares | | | (10,955 | ) | | | (12,621 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from | | | | | | | | |
shareholder dividends | | | (24,266 | ) | | | (319,836 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | | (509,745,826 | ) | | | (682,335,435 | ) |
Change in net assets | | | (509,768,842 | ) | | | (682,374,644 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 2,603,083,746 | | | | 3,285,458,390 | |
End of period | | $ | 2,093,314,904 | | | $ | 2,603,083,746 | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | $ | 9 | | | $ | — | |
36 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund |
| For the six months ended April 30, 2012 | For the year ended October 31, 2011 |
| (Unaudited) | | | | |
CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,775,885 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | 187 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (607,887 | ) | | | (34,165,775 | ) |
Class A Shares capital transactions | | | (607,887 | ) | | | (32,389,703 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | — | | | | 1,031 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | — | | | | 6 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | — | | | | (15,915 | ) |
Class B Shares capital transactions | | | — | | | | (14,878 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | 114,177 | | | | — | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (114,177 | ) | | | (41 | ) |
Class C Shares capital transactions | | | — | | | | (41 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Class D Shares: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | 888,788,332 | | | | 2,802,057,554 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 2,757 | | | | 49,431 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (989,038,320 | ) | | | (2,908,396,536 | ) |
Class D Shares capital transactions | | | (100,247,231 | ) | | | (106,289,551 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | 1,372,267,863 | | | | 8,121,397,977 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 3,734 | | | | 75,052 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (1,923,095,340 | ) | | | (8,517,488,640 | ) |
Class I Shares capital transactions | | | (550,823,743 | ) | | | (396,015,611 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Class Y Shares: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | 1,113,880,486 | | | | 2,033,753,306 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 10,587 | | | | 101,736 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | (971,958,038 | ) | | | (2,181,480,693 | ) |
Class Y Shares capital transactions | | | 141,933,035 | | | | (147,625,651 | ) |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | $ | (509,745,826 | ) | | $ | (682,335,435 | ) |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 37 |
HSBC NEW YORK TAX-FREE MONEY MARKET FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | | Net Investment Income (Loss) | | Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Investments | | Total from Investment Activities | | Net Investment Income | | Net Realized Gains from Investment Transactions | | Total Dividends | | Net Asset Value, End of Period | | Total Return(a) | | Net Assets at End of Period (000’s) | | Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets(b) | | Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Fees Paid Indirectly)(b) | | Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(b) | | Ratios of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Fee Reductions)(b) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 3.00 | %(c) | | | | $ | 120,841 | | | | | 0.65 | %(c) | | | | 0.65 | % | | | | 2.98 | %(c) | | | | 0.67 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 1.94 | % | | | | | 45,791 | | | | | 0.63 | % | | | | 0.63 | % | | | | 2.09 | % | | | | 0.63 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.18 | %(e) | | | | | 40,698 | | | | | 0.49 | %(e) | | | | 0.49 | %(e) | | | | 0.21 | %(e) | | | | 0.67 | %(e) | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | | | 14,564 | | | | | 0.23 | % | | | | 0.23 | % | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | | 0.64 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 196 | | | | | 0.22 | % | | | | 0.22 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | 0.66 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | | 196 | | | | | 0.17 | % | | | | 0.17 | % | | | | — | % | | | | 0.69 | % | |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 2.39 | %(c) | | | | $ | 34 | | | | | 1.25 | %(c) | | | | 1.25 | % | | | | 2.38 | %(c) | | | | 1.27 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.01 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.01 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 1.33 | % | | | | | 35 | | | | | 1.23 | % | | | | 1.23 | % | | | | 1.30 | % | | | | 1.23 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.08 | %(e) | | | | | 21 | | | | | 0.65 | %(e) | | | | 0.65 | %(e) | | | | 0.08 | %(e) | | | | 1.27 | %(e) | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010(g) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | — | | | | | 0.22 | % | | | | 0.22 | % | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | | 1.24 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011(h) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)(h) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007(i) | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | $ | — | (j) | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008(i) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | (j) | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009(h) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010(h) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011(h) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)(h) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
CLASS D SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 3.16 | %(c) | | | | $ | 531,864 | | | | | 0.50 | %(c) | | | | 0.50 | % | | | | 3.14 | %(c) | | | | 0.52 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 2.09 | % | | | | | 586,791 | | | | | 0.48 | % | | | | 0.48 | % | | | | 1.99 | % | | | | 0.48 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.25 | %(e) | | | | | 423,061 | | | | | 0.43 | %(e) | | | | 0.43 | %(e) | | | | 0.26 | %(e) | | | | 0.52 | %(e) | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | | | 380,888 | | | | | 0.23 | % | | | | 0.23 | % | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | | 0.49 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 420,048 | | | | | 0.19 | % | | | | 0.19 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | 0.51 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | | 195,101 | | | | | 0.15 | % | | | | 0.15 | % | | | | — | % | | | | 0.53 | % | |
CLASS Y SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 3.42 | %(c) | | | | $ | 339,665 | | | | | 0.25 | %(c) | | | | 0.25 | % | | | | 3.39 | %(c) | | | | 0.27 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 2.35 | % | | | | | 319,797 | | | | | 0.23 | % | | | | 0.23 | % | | | | 2.27 | % | | | | 0.23 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.40 | %(e) | | | | | 210,706 | | | | | 0.26 | %(e) | | | | 0.26 | %(e) | | | | 0.39 | %(e) | | | | 0.27 | %(e) | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | | | 105,303 | | | | | 0.22 | % | | | | 0.22 | % | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | | 0.24 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 107,804 | | | | | 0.19 | % | | | | 0.19 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | 0.26 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | % | | | | | 118,895 | | | | | 0.16 | % | | | | 0.16 | % | | | | — | % | | | | 0.28 | % | |
(a) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any redemption charges. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | During the year ended October 31, 2007, the Investment Adviser reimbursed amounts to the Fund related to past marketing arrangements. The corresponding impact to the net expense ratio, net income ratio and the total return were 0.02%, 0.02%, 0.02%, and 0.02% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class D Shares, and Class Y Shares, respectively. |
(d) | Represents less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
(e) | Included in the ratios is the Treasury Guarantee Program fees incurred by the Fund during the period. Without these fees, the gross and net expense ratios would have been decreased by 0.04% and the total return and net investment income ratio would have increased by 0.04%. |
(f) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Fund received a distribution from a “fair fund” established by the SEC in connection with a consent order against BISYS Fund Services, Inc. (See Note 7 in Notes to Financial Statements). The corresponding impact to the net income ratio and the total return was less than 0.005%. |
(g) | Class B Shares were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the class had operations, which was 190 days during the period. The net asset value, end of period, presented is as of the last day during the class had operations. |
(h) | During the period the class had no operations. The net asset values reflected represent the last day the class had shareholders. |
(i) | During the year ended, Class C Shares had no operations. Net assets at the end of the period represent seed money. The net asset values reflected represent the last day the class had shareholders. |
(j) | Less than $500. |
38 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC PRIME MONEY MARKET FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | Investments Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | | Net Investment Income (Loss) | | Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Investments | | Total from Investment Activities | | Net Investment Income | | Total Dividends | | Net Asset Value, End of Period | | Total Return(a) | | Net Assets at End of Period (000’s) | | Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets(b) | | Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Fees Paid Indirectly)(b) | | Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(b) | | Ratios of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Fee Reductions)(b) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 0.05 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.05 | | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 4.77 | %(d) | | | | $ | 471,148 | | | | 0.67 | %(d) | | | | 0.67 | %(d) | | | | 4.68 | %(d) | | | | | 0.70 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.03 | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 2.71 | %(e) | | | | | 308,499 | | | | 0.67 | % | | | | 0.67 | % | | | | 2.73 | % | | | | | 0.67 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.32 | %(f) | | | | | 343,265 | | | | 0.55 | %(f) | | | | 0.55 | %(f) | | | | 0.31 | %(f) | | | | | 0.69 | %(f) | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(h) | | | | | 32,943 | | | | 0.29 | % | | | | 0.29 | % | | | | 0.01 | %(h) | | | | | 0.67 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 27,763 | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 0.68 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 31,052 | | | | 0.29 | % | | | | 0.29 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 0.69 | % | | |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 0.04 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.04 | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 4.14 | %(d) | | | | $ | 204 | | | | 1.27 | %(d) | | | | 1.27 | %(d) | | | | 4.07 | %(d) | | | | | 1.30 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 2.10 | %(e) | | | | | 199 | | | | 1.27 | % | | | | 1.27 | % | | | | 2.08 | % | | | | | 1.27 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.17 | %(f) | | | | | 312 | | | | 0.68 | %(f) | | | | 0.68 | %(f) | | | | 0.13 | %(f) | | | | | 1.30 | %(f) | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(h) | | | | | 226 | | | | 0.29 | % | | | | 0.29 | % | | | | 0.01 | %(h) | | | | | 1.27 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 132 | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 1.28 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 71 | | | | 0.28 | % | | | | 0.28 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 1.29 | % | | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 0.04 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.04 | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 4.14 | %(d) | | | | $ | 317,217 | | | | 1.27 | %(d) | | | | 1.27 | %(d) | | | | 4.08 | %(d) | | | | | 1.30 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 2.10 | %(e) | | | | | 316,779 | | | | 1.27 | % | | | | 1.27 | % | | | | 2.04 | % | | | | | 1.27 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.17 | %(f) | | | | | 259,364 | | | | 0.74 | %(f) | | | | 0.74 | %(f) | | | | 0.19 | %(f) | | | | | 1.29 | %(f) | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(h) | | | | | 44 | | | | 0.29 | % | | | | 0.29 | % | | | | 0.01 | %(h) | | | | | 1.27 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 6 | | | | 0.25 | % | | | | 0.25 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 1.28 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.03 | % | | | | | 6 | | | | 0.23 | % | | | | 0.23 | % | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | | 1.31 | % | | |
CLASS D SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 0.05 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.05 | | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 4.92 | %(d) | | | | $ | 3,710,803 | | | | 0.52 | %(d) | | | | 0.52 | %(d) | | | | 4.83 | %(d) | | | | | 0.55 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.03 | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 2.86 | %(e) | | | | | 2,720,592 | | | | 0.52 | % | | | | 0.52 | % | | | | 2.89 | % | | | | | 0.52 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.40 | %(f) | | | | | 1,994,448 | | | | 0.49 | %(f) | | | | 0.49 | %(f) | | | | 0.42 | %(f) | | | | | 0.54 | %(f) | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(h) | | | | | 1,695,222 | | | | 0.29 | % | | | | 0.29 | % | | | | 0.01 | %(h) | | | | | 0.52 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 1,591,614 | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 0.53 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 1,271,491 | | | | 0.28 | % | | | | 0.28 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 0.54 | % | | |
CLASS I SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 0.05 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.05 | | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 5.33 | %(d) | | | | $ | 1,870,485 | | | | 0.14 | %(d) | | | | 0.14 | %(d) | | | | 5.21 | %(d) | | | | | 0.21 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.03 | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 3.23 | %(e) | | | | | 2,954,253 | | | | 0.16 | % | | | | 0.16 | % | | | | 3.14 | % | | | | | 0.17 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.01 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.01 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.69 | %(f) | | | | | 7,189,613 | | | | 0.18 | %(f) | | | | 0.18 | %(f) | | | | 0.55 | %(f) | | | | | 0.19 | %(f) | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.14 | %(h) | | | | | 4,679,632 | | | | 0.17 | % | | | | 0.17 | % | | | | 0.14 | %(h) | | | | | 0.17 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.10 | % | | | | | 4,309,346 | | | | 0.17 | % | | | | 0.17 | % | | | | 0.10 | % | | | | | 0.18 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | | 3,020,983 | | | | 0.17 | % | | | | 0.17 | % | | | | 0.12 | % | | | | | 0.19 | % | | |
CLASS Y SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | 0.05 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.05 | | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 5.19 | %(d) | | | | $ | 1,036,994 | | | | 0.27 | %(d) | | | | 0.27 | %(d) | | | | 5.08 | %(d) | | | | | 0.30 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.03 | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 3.12 | %(e) | | | | | 2,236,927 | | | | 0.27 | % | | | | 0.27 | % | | | | 2.96 | % | | | | | 0.27 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | 0.01 | | | | | — | (c) | | | | 0.01 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.58 | %(f) | | | | | 1,194,680 | | | | 0.29 | %(f) | | | | 0.29 | %(f) | | | | 0.68 | %(f) | | | | | 0.29 | %(f) | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.05 | %(h) | | | | | 1,107,571 | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.04 | %(h) | | | | | 0.27 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 642,290 | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.02 | % | | | | | 0.28 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | — | (c)(g) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | — | (c) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 592,839 | | | | 0.28 | % | | | | 0.28 | % | | | | 0.02 | % | | | | | 0.29 | % | | |
(a) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any redemption charges. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | Represents less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
(d) | During the year ended October 31, 2007, the Investment Adviser reimbursed amounts to certain Funds related to past marketing arrangements. The corresponding impact to the net expense ratio, net income ratio and the total return were 0.02%, 0.02%, 0.02%, 0.02%, 0.02% and 0.02% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares, respectively. |
(e) | During the year ended October 31, 2008, an affiliate of the Fund’s investment adviser purchased certain defaulted securities at $16, 746,382, in excess of their fair value on the purchase date. The corresponding impact of this excess amount to the total returns were 0.20%, 0.20%, 0.20%, 0.20%, 0.20% and 0.20% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares, respectively. |
(f) | Included in the ratios is the Treasury Guarantee Program fess incurred by the Fund during the period. Without these fees, the gross and net expense ratios would have been decreased by 0.03% and the total return and net investment income ratio would have increased by 0.03%. |
(g) | Calculated based on average shares outstanding. |
(h) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Fund received a distribution from a “fair fund” established by the SEC in connection with a consent order against BISYS Fund Services, Inc. (See Note 7 in Notes to Financial Statements). The corresponding impact to the net income ratio and the total return was less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 39 |
HSBC TAX-FREE MONEY MARKET FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | | Net Investment Income (Loss) | | Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Investments | | Total from Investment Activities | | Net Investment Income | | Net Realized Gains from Investment Transactions | | Total Dividends | | Net Asset Value, End of Period | | Total Return(a) | | Net Assets at End of Period (000’s) | | Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets(b) | | Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets, (Excluding Fees Paid Indirectly)(b) | | Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets(b) | | Ratios of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Fee Reductions)(b) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007(c) | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.18 | % | | | | $ | — | | | | | 0.72 | % | | | | 0.72 | % | | | | 2.96 | % | | | | 0.92 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008(e) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009(f) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(g) | | | | | — | (h) | | | | 0.31 | %(g) | | | | 0.31 | %(g) | | | | 0.36 | %(g) | | | | 0.07 | %(g) | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | %(i) | | | | | — | (h) | | | | 0.15 | % | | | | 0.15 | % | | | | 0.12 | %(i) | | | | 0.28 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011(j) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | (0.02 | )% | | | | 0.46 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)(e) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007(k) | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.09 | % | | | | $ | — | | | | | 1.34 | % | | | | 1.34 | % | | | | 2.24 | % | | | | 1.54 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008(e) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009(e) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010(e) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011(e) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)(e) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
CLASS D SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 3.04 | % | | | | $ | 40,184 | | | | | 0.63 | % | | | | 0.63 | % | | | | 3.04 | % | | | | 0.83 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 2.13 | % | | | | | 69,787 | | | | | 0.46 | % | | | | 0.46 | % | | | | 2.05 | % | | | | 0.66 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.31 | %(g) | | | | | 95,350 | | | | | 0.43 | %(g) | | | | 0.43 | %(g) | | | | 0.29 | %(g) | | | | 0.63 | %(g) | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(i) | | | | | 73,988 | | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.26 | % | | | | 0.01 | %(i) | | | | 0.64 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 79,963 | | | | | 0.24 | % | | | | 0.24 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | 0.68 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | 79,198 | | | | | 0.19 | % | | | | 0.19 | % | | | | — | % | | | | 0.67 | % | |
CLASS I SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007(e) | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | $ | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008(e) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010(l) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(i) | | | | | — | | | | | 0.16 | % | | | | 0.16 | % | | | | 0.09 | %(i) | | | | 0.37 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011(e) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)(e) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | |
CLASS Y SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.03 | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 3.30 | % | | | | $ | 18,936 | | | | | 0.34 | % | | | | 0.34 | % | | | | 3.31 | % | | | | 0.54 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 2.38 | % | | | | | 143,730 | | | | | 0.20 | % | | | | 0.20 | % | | | | 2.31 | % | | | | 0.40 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | 0.01 | | | | | — | (d) | | | | 0.01 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | — | (d) | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.55 | %(g) | | | | | 97,789 | | | | | 0.18 | %(g) | | | | 0.18 | %(g) | | | | 0.57 | %(g) | | | | 0.38 | %(g) | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.08 | %(i) | | | | | 31,180 | | | | | 0.18 | % | | | | 0.18 | % | | | | 0.09 | %(i) | | | | 0.39 | % | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.02 | % | | | | | 40,656 | | | | | 0.20 | % | | | | 0.20 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | 0.44 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | 24,934 | | | | | 0.18 | % | | | | 0.18 | % | | | | — | % | | | | 0.42 | % | |
(a) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any redemption charges. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | Class A Shares were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of the time the class had operations, which was 24 days during the period. The net asset value, end of period, presented is as of the last day during the period the class had shareholders. |
(d) | Represents less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
(e) | During the period the class had no operations. The net asset values reflected represent the last day the class had shareholders. |
(f) | Class A Shares were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the class had operations, which was 262 days during the period. The net asset value, end of period, presented as of the last day during the period the class had shareholders. |
(g) | Included in the ratios is the Treasury Guarantee Program fess incurred by the Fund during the period. Without these fees, the gross and net expense ratios would have been decreased by 0.03% and the total return and net investment income ratio would have increased by 0.03%. |
(h) | Less than $500. |
(i) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Fund received a distribution from a “fair fund” established by the SEC in connection with a consent order against BISYS Fund Services, Inc. (See Note 7 in Notes to Financial Statements). The corresponding impact to the net income ratio and the total return was less than 0.005%. |
(j) | Class A Shares were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of the time the class had operations, which was 141 days during the period. The net asset value, end of period, presented is as of the last day during the period the class had shareholders. |
(k) | Class C Shares commenced operations on July 30, 2007 and were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the class had operations, which was 15 days during the period. The net asset value, end of period, presented is as of the last day during the class had shareholders. |
(l) | Class I Shares were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the class had operations, which was 51 days during the period. The net asset value, end of period, presented is as of the last day during the period the class had shareholders. |
40 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC U.S. GOVERNMENT MONEY MARKET FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | Net Realized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Expenses | | Ratio of Net | | Ratios of |
| | | | | | | | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to Average | | Investment | | Expenses |
| | Net Asset | | Net | | Unrealized | | | | | | | | Net Realized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Net Assets | | Income | | to Average |
| | Value, | | Investment | | Gains | | Total from | | Net | | Gains from | | | | | Net Asset | | | | | Net Assets at | | Expenses to | | (Excluding | | to Average | | Net Assets |
| | Beginning | | Income | | (Losses) from | | Investment | | Investment | | Investment | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | End of Period | | Average Net | | Fees Paid | | Net | | (Excluding Fee |
| | of Period | | (Loss) | | Investments | | Activities | | Income | | Transactions | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(a) | | (000’s) | | Assets(b) | | Indirectly)(b) | | Assets(b) | | Reductions)(b) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 0.05 | | | — | | | 0.05 | | | (0.05 | ) | | — | | | (0.05 | ) | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 4.63 | %(c) | | $ | 1,090,807 | | | 0.65 | %(c) | | 0.65 | % | | 4.56 | %(c) | | 0.70 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.02 | | | — | | | 0.02 | | | (0.02 | ) | | — | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 2.20 | % | | | 703,712 | | | 0.67 | % | | 0.67 | % | | 2.29 | % | | 0.67 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.14 | %(e) | | | 574,577 | | | 0.52 | %(e) | | 0.52 | %(e) | | 0.14 | %(e) | | 0.72 | %(e) |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | 25,926 | | | 0.23 | % | | 0.23 | % | | 0.01 | %(f) | | 0.67 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.01 | % | | | 3,995 | | | 0.16 | % | | 0.16 | % | | 0.01 | % | | 0.68 | % |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.01 | % | | | 1,781 | | | 0.13 | % | | 0.14 | % | | 0.01 | % | | 0.69 | % |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 0.05 | | | — | | | 0.05 | | | (0.05 | ) | | — | | | (0.05 | ) | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 4.76 | %(c) | | $ | 1 | | | 1.25 | %(c) | | 1.25 | % | | 4.01 | %(c) | | 1.28 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.02 | | | — | | | 0.02 | | | (0.02 | ) | | — | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 1.67 | % | | | 54 | | | 1.29 | % | | 1.29 | % | | 1.24 | % | | 1.29 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.08 | %(e) | | | 84 | | | 0.54 | %(e) | | 0.54 | %(e) | | 0.08 | %(e) | | 1.30 | %(e) |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | 88 | | | 0.22 | % | | 0.22 | % | | 0.01 | %(f) | | 1.27 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.01 | % | | | 94 | | | 0.17 | % | | 0.17 | % | | 0.01 | % | | 1.28 | % |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.01 | % | | | 76 | | | 0.14 | % | | 0.14 | % | | 0.01 | % | | 1.29 | % |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended October 31, 2007(g) | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 0.04 | | | — | | | 0.04 | | | (0.04 | ) | | — | | | (0.04 | ) | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 3.79 | %(c) | | $ | 428 | | | 1.20 | %(c) | | 1.20 | % | | 3.78 | %(c) | | 1.25 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.02 | | | — | | | 0.02 | | | (0.02 | ) | | — | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 1.59 | % | | | 101 | | | 1.27 | % | | 1.27 | % | | 1.28 | % | | 1.27 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2009(h) | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.08 | %(e) | | | 229 | | | 0.50 | %(e) | | 0.50 | %(e) | | 0.04 | %(e) | | 1.32 | %(e) |
Year Ended October 31, 2010(i) | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | — | (j) | | 0.23 | % | | 0.23 | % | | 0.01 | %(f) | | 1.27 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2011(k) | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | % | | | — | | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)(k) | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | % | | | — | | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
CLASS D SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 0.05 | | | — | | | 0.05 | | | (0.05 | ) | | — | | | (0.05 | ) | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 4.79 | %(c) | | $ | 761,155 | | | 0.50 | %(c) | | 0.50 | % | | 4.66 | %(c) | | 0.54 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.02 | | | — | | | 0.02 | | | (0.02 | ) | | — | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 2.36 | % | | | 1,438,199 | | | 0.52 | % | | 0.52 | % | | 1.92 | % | | 0.52 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.18 | %(e) | | | 767,551 | | | 0.48 | %(e) | | 0.48 | %(e) | | 0.21 | %(e) | | 0.58 | %(e) |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | 922,510 | | | 0.22 | % | | 0.22 | % | | 0.02 | %(f) | | 0.52 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.01 | % | | | 746,458 | | | 0.17 | % | | 0.17 | % | | 0.01 | % | | 0.53 | % |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.01 | % | | | 604,320 | | | 0.14 | % | | 0.14 | % | | 0.01 | % | | 0.54 | % |
CLASS I SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007(l) | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 0.05 | | | — | | | 0.05 | | | (0.05 | ) | | — | | | (0.05 | ) | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 4.99 | %(c) | | $ | 949,095 | | | 0.15 | %(c) | | 0.15 | % | | 4.73 | %(c) | | 0.17 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.03 | | | — | | | 0.03 | | | (0.03 | ) | | — | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 2.72 | % | | | 4,908,887 | | | 0.17 | % | | 0.17 | % | | 2.23 | % | | 0.18 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.43 | %(e) | | | 8,176,980 | | | 0.22 | %(e) | | 0.22 | %(e) | | 0.38 | %(e) | | 0.22 | %(e) |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.08 | %(f) | | | 5,100,891 | | | 0.16 | % | | 0.16 | % | | 0.07 | %(f) | | 0.17 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.03 | % | | | 1,645,764 | | | 0.16 | % | | 0.16 | % | | 0.03 | % | | 0.18 | % |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.01 | % | | | 2,025,260 | | | 0.14 | % | | 0.14 | % | | 0.01 | % | | 0.19 | % |
CLASS Y SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 0.05 | | | — | | | 0.05 | | | (0.05 | ) | | — | | | (0.05 | ) | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | 5.05 | %(c) | | $ | 6,267,594 | | | 0.26 | %(c) | | 0.26 | % | | 4.78 | %(c) | | 0.28 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.03 | | | — | | | 0.03 | | | (0.03 | ) | | — | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 2.61 | % | | | 6,747,758 | | | 0.27 | % | | 0.27 | % | | 2.53 | % | | 0.27 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.32 | %(e) | | | 3,370,299 | | | 0.33 | %(e) | | 0.33 | %(e) | | 0.38 | %(e) | | 0.33 | %(e) |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.02 | %(f) | | | 2,918,347 | | | 0.22 | % | | 0.22 | % | | 0.02 | %(f) | | 0.27 | % |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.01 | % | | | 1,711,397 | | | 0.17 | % | | 0.17 | % | | 0.01 | % | | 0.28 | % |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | 1.00 | | | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | — | (d) | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.01 | % | | | 2,587,853 | | | 0.14 | % | | 0.14 | % | | 0.01 | % | | 0.29 | % |
(a) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include redemption charges. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | During the year ended October 31, 2007, the Investment Adviser reimbursed amounts to certain Funds related to past marketing arrangements. The corresponding impact to the net expense ratio, net income ratio and the total return were 0.03%, 0.03%, 0.02%, 0.00% and 0.01% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares, respectively. |
(d) | Represents less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
(e) | Included in the ratios is the Treasury Guarantee Program fees incurred by the Fund during the period. Without these fees, the gross and net expense ratios would have been decreased by 0.06% and the total return and net investment income ratio would have increased by 0.06%. |
(f) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Fund received a distribution from a “fair fund” established by the SEC in connection with a consent order against BISYS Fund Services, Inc. (See Note 7 in Notes to Financial Statements). The corresponding impact to the net income ratio and the total return was less than 0.005%. |
(g) | Class C Shares commenced operations on November 20, 2006 and were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the class had operations, which was 346 days during the period. |
(h) | Class C Shares were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the class had operations, which was 362 days during the period. |
(i) | Class C Shares were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the class had operations, which was 351 days during the period. |
(j) | Less than $500. |
(k) | During the period the class had no operations. The net asset values reflected represent the last day the class had shareholders. |
(l) | Class I Shares were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the class had operations, which was 357 days during the period. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 41 |
HSBC U.S. TREASURY MONEY MARKET FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | | Net Investment Income (Loss) | | Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Investments | | Total from Investment Activities | | Net Investment Income | | Net Realized Gains from Investment Transactions | | Total Dividends | | Net Asset Value, End of Period | | Total Return(a) | | Net Assets at End of Period (000’s) | | Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets(b) | | Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Fees Paid Indirectly)(b) | | Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(b) | | Ratios of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Fee Reductions)(b) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.04 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.04 | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 4.19 | %(c) | | | | $ | 84,355 | | | | 0.68 | %(c) | | | | 0.68 | % | | | | 4.09 | %(c) | | | | | 0.74 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.01 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 1.38 | % | | | | | 580,458 | | | | 0.67 | % | | | | 0.67 | % | | | | 1.06 | % | | | | | 0.67 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.07 | % | | | | | 385,994 | | | | 0.24 | % | | | | 0.24 | % | | | | 0.07 | % | | | | | 0.66 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | 32,973 | | | | 0.14 | % | | | | 0.14 | % | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | 0.67 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 613 | | | | 0.11 | % | | | | 0.12 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 0.68 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | 5 | | | | 0.05 | % | | | | 0.05 | % | | | | — | % | | | | | 0.70 | % | | |
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.04 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.04 | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 3.57 | %(c) | | | | $ | 41 | | | | 1.28 | %(c) | | | | 1.28 | % | | | | 3.51 | %(c) | | | | | 1.35 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.01 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.86 | % | | | | | 131 | | | | 1.11 | % | | | | 1.11 | % | | | | 1.01 | % | | | | | 1.28 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.07 | % | | | | | 60 | | | | 0.24 | % | | | | 0.24 | % | | | | 0.07 | % | | | | | 1.26 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | 50 | | | | 0.14 | % | | | | 0.14 | % | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | 1.27 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 35 | | | | 0.10 | % | | | | 0.10 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 1.28 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | 35 | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | — | % | | | | | 1.30 | % | | |
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008(g) | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | $ | 1,103 | | | | 0.64 | % | | | | 0.64 | % | | | | 0.20 | % | | | | | 1.26 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.07 | % | | | | | 7,138 | | | | 0.22 | % | | | | 0.22 | % | | | | 0.04 | % | | | | | 1.26 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010(h) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | — | | (i) | | 0.13 | % | | | | 0.13 | % | | | | — | %(f) | | | | | 1.27 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011(j) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (e) | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | | — | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)(j) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | — | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % | | | | | — | % | | |
CLASS D SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.04 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.04 | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 4.34 | %(c) | | | | $ | 297,120 | | | | 0.53 | %(c) | | | | 0.53 | % | | | | 4.28 | %(c) | | | | | 0.62 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 1.53 | % | | | | | 937,905 | | | | 0.52 | % | | | | 0.52 | % | | | | 1.33 | % | | | | | 0.59 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.07 | % | | | | | 955,652 | | | | 0.23 | % | | | | 0.23 | % | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | | 0.51 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | 726,244 | | | | 0.14 | % | | | | 0.14 | % | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | 0.52 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 619,940 | | | | 0.10 | % | | | | 0.10 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 0.53 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | 519,687 | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | — | % | | | | | 0.54 | % | | |
CLASS I SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.05 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.05 | | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 4.74 | %(c) | | | | $ | 73,460 | | | | 0.15 | %(c) | | | | 0.15 | % | | | | 4.38 | %(c) | | | | | 0.22 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 1.90 | % | | | | | 3,771,262 | | | | 0.16 | % | | | | 0.16 | % | | | | 1.26 | % | | | | | 0.16 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.14 | % | | | | | 3,322,962 | | | | 0.16 | % | | | | 0.16 | % | | | | 0.14 | % | | | | | 0.16 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | 1,379,042 | | | | 0.13 | % | | | | 0.13 | % | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | 0.17 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 982,974 | | | | 0.10 | % | | | | 0.10 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 0.18 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | 432,144 | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | — | % | | | | | 0.19 | % | | |
CLASS Y SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2007 | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.05 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.05 | | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | | | 4.60 | %(c) | | | | $ | 41,256 | | | | 0.27 | %(c) | | | | 0.27 | % | | | | 4.34 | %(c) | | | | | 0.32 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2008 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | — | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 1.78 | % | | | | | 1,364,310 | | | | 0.27 | % | | | | 0.27 | % | | | | 1.34 | % | | | | | 0.27 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2009 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.08 | % | | | | | 996,309 | | | | 0.22 | % | | | | 0.22 | % | | | | 0.08 | % | | | | | 0.26 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | 1,147,150 | | | | 0.14 | % | | | | 0.14 | % | | | | 0.01 | %(f) | | | | | 0.27 | % | | |
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 999,521 | | | | 0.09 | % | | | | 0.10 | % | | | | 0.01 | % | | | | | 0.28 | % | | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | (d)(e) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | | | | | — | (d) | | | | — | (d) | | | | | | | 1.00 | | | | | | — | % | | | | | 1,141,444 | | | | 0.06 | % | | | | 0.07 | % | | | | — | % | | | | | 0.29 | % | | |
(a) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any redemption charges. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | During the year ended October 31, 2007, the Investment Adviser reimbursed amounts to certain Funds related to past marketing arrangements. The corresponding impact to the net expense ratio, net income ratio and the total return were 0.01%, 0.01%, 0.01%, 0.01% and 0.01% for Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class D Shares, Class I Shares and Class Y Shares, respectively. |
(d) | Represents less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
(e) | Calculated based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Fund received a distribution from a “fair fund” established by the SEC in connection with a consent order against BISYS Fund Services, Inc. (See Note 7 in Notes to Financial Statements). The corresponding impact to the net income ratio and the total return was less than 0.005%. |
(g) | Class C Shares were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the class had operations, which was 26 days during the period. |
(h) | Class C Shares were operational during a portion of the year only. Amounts reflect performance for the period of time the class had operations, which was 351 days during the period. |
(i) | Less than $500. |
(j) | During the period the class had no operations. The net asset values reflected represent the last day the class had shareholders. |
42 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
1. Organization:
The HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds) (the “Trust’’), a Massachusetts business trust organized on April 22, 1987, and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act’’), as open-end management investment company. As of April 30, 2012, the Trust is comprised of 16 separate operational funds, each a series of the HSBC Family of Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Family of Funds), which also includes the HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and the HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (collectively the “Trusts’’). The accompanying financial statements are presented for the following 5 funds (individually a “Fund,’’ collectively the “Funds’’):
Fund | | Short Name | |
HSBC New York Tax-Free Money Market Fund | N.Y. Tax-Free Money Market Fund |
(formerly, HSBC Investor New York Tax-Free | |
Money Market Fund) | |
HSBC Prime Money Market Fund | Prime Money Market Fund |
(formerly, HSBC Investor Prime | |
Money Market Fund) | |
HSBC Tax-Free Money Market Fund | Tax-Free Money Market Fund |
(formerly, HSBC Investor Tax-Free | |
Money Market Fund) | |
HSBC U.S. Government Money Market Fund | U.S. Government Money Market Fund |
(formerly, HSBC Investor U.S. Government | |
Money Market Fund | |
HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund | U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund |
(formerly, HSBC Investor U.S. Treasury | |
Money Market Fund) | |
All the Funds are diversified funds. Financial statements for all other funds of the Trusts are published separately.
The Funds are authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with a par value of $0.001 per share. The Funds are authorized to issue six classes of shares: Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares, Class E Shares and Class Y Shares. In addition, the Prime Money Market Fund, Tax-Free Money Market Fund, U.S. Government Money Market Fund and U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund are authorized to issue Class I Shares. The Class B Shares of the Funds are offered without any front-end sales charge but will be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC’’) ranging from a maximum of 4.00% if redeemed less than one year after purchase to 0.00% if redeemed more than four years after purchase. Class C Shares of the Funds are offered without any front-end sales charge but will be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00% if redeemed less than one year after purchase. No sales charges are assessed with respect to Class A, Class D, Class E, Class I or Class Y Shares of the Funds. Each class of shares in each Fund has identical rights and privileges, except with respect to arrangements pertaining to shareholder servicing and/or distribution, class-related expenses, voting rights on matters affecting a single class of shares, and exchange privileges. As of April 30, 2012, Class E Shares were not operational.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, the Funds’ Officers and Trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Trust may enter into contracts with its service providers, which also provide for indemnifications by the Funds. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds. However, based on experience, the Trust expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies:
The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements. The policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP’’). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 43
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Securities Valuation:
Investments of the Funds are valued using the amortized cost method pursuant to Rule 2a-7 under the Act, which approximates fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described below.
Investment Transactions and Related Income:
Investment transactions are accounted for not later than one business day after trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Investment gains and losses are calculated on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization or accretion of premium or discount. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Restricted and Illiquid Securities:
A restricted security is a security which has been purchased through a private offering and cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act’’) or pursuant to the resale limitations provided by Rule 144 under the 1933 Act, or another exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act. Certain restricted securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers, and may be deemed liquid by the Investment Adviser (as defined in Note 4) based on procedures established by the Board of Trustees (the “Board’’). Therefore, not all restricted securities are considered illiquid. At April 30, 2012, the Funds did not hold any restricted securities that were not deemed liquid.
Repurchase Agreements:
The Funds (except U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund) may enter into repurchase agreements with an entity which is a member of the Federal Reserve System or which is a “primary dealer’’ (as designated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) in U.S. government obligations. The U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund may temporarily invest in repurchase agreements collaterized by U.S. Treasury Obligations. The repurchase price generally equals the price paid by a Fund plus interest negotiated on the basis of current short-term rates, which may be more or less than the rate on the underlying portfolio securities. The seller, under a repurchase agreement, is required to maintain the collateral held pursuant to the agreement, with a fair value equal to or greater than the repurchase price (including accrued interest). Collateral subject to repurchase agreements is held by the Funds’ custodian or another qualified custodian or in the Federal Reserve/Treasury book-entry system. In the event of counterparty default, the Fund has the right to use the collateral to offset losses incurred. There is potential for loss to the Fund in the event the Fund is delayed or prevented from exercising its rights to dispose of the collateral securities, including the risk of a possible decline in the fair value of the underlying securities during the period while the Fund seeks to assert its rights.
Allocations:
Expenses directly attributable to a Fund are charged to that Fund. Expenses not directly attributable to a Fund are allocated proportionately among the applicable series within the Trusts in relation to the net assets of each fund or on another reasonable basis. Class specific expenses are charged directly to the class incurring the expense. In addition, income, expenses (other than class specific expenses), and unrealized/realized gains and losses are allocated to each class based on relative net assets on a daily basis.
Dividends to Shareholders:
Dividends to shareholders from net investment income, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly from each Fund. Dividends from net realized gains, if any, are declared and paid at least annually by the Funds. Additional distributions are also made to the Funds’ shareholders to the extent necessary to avoid the federal excise tax on certain undistributed income and net realized gains of regulated investment companies.
44 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
The character of net investment income and net realized gains distributed are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These “book/tax’’ differences are either considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., reclassification of market discounts, certain gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash losses and post-October loss deferrals) do not require reclassification. To the extent distributions to shareholders from net investment income and net realized gains exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes, they are reported as distributions of capital.
Federal Income Taxes:
Each Fund is a separate taxable entity for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund has qualified and intends to continue to qualify each year as a “regulated investment company’’ under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and to distribute substantially all of its taxable net investment income and net realized gains, if any, to its shareholders. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is required.
Management of the Funds has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
3. Investment Valuation Summary:
The valuation techniques employed by the Funds, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Funds’ investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
- Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
- Level 2: other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
- Level 3: significant unobservable inputs (including a Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments of the Funds are valued using the amortized cost method pursuant to Rule 2a-7 under the Act, which approximates fair value and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The amortized cost method involves valuing an instrument at its cost initially and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discounts or premium, regardless of the impact of fluctuating interest rates on the market value of the instrument. The amortized cost method may result in periods during which value, as determined by amortized cost, is higher or lower than the price a Fund holding the instrument would receive if it sold the instrument. The fair value of securities in the Funds can be expected to vary with changes in prevailing interest rates.
Investments in other money market funds are priced at net asset value as reported by such companies and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Repurchase agreements are valued at original cost and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
For the period ended April 30, 2012, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 45
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of April 30, 2012 in valuing the Funds’ investments based upon the three levels defined above:
| | LEVEL 1($) | | LEVEL 2($) | | LEVEL 3($) | | Total($) |
New York Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities(a): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable Rate Demand Notes | | | — | | | 254,945,000 | | | — | | | 254,945,000 |
Municipal Bonds | | | — | | | 58,476,928 | | | — | | | 58,476,928 |
Total Investment Securities | | | — | | | 313,421,928 | | | — | | | 313,421,928 |
|
Prime Money Market Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities(a): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Certificates of Deposit | | | — | | | 1,050,000,715 | | | — | | | 1,050,000,715 |
Commercial Paper and Notes | | | — | | | 1,888,878,801 | | | — | | | 1,888,878,801 |
Corporate Obligations | | | — | | | 323,336,730 | | | — | | | 323,336,730 |
Yankee Dollars | | | — | | | 246,583,859 | | | — | | | 246,583,859 |
Variable Rate Demand Notes | | | — | | | 223,315,000 | | | — | | | 223,315,000 |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | | — | | | 526,881,080 | | | — | | | 526,881,080 |
Repurchase Agreements | | | — | | | 400,000,000 | | | — | | | 400,000,000 |
Time Deposits | | | — | | | 256,000,000 | | | — | | | 256,000,000 |
Total Investment Securities | | | — | | | 4,914,996,185 | | | — | | | 4,914,996,185 |
|
Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities(a): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial Paper and Notes | | | — | | | 2,000,000 | | | — | | | 2,000,000 |
Variable Rate Demand Notes | | | — | | | 76,380,000 | | | — | | | 76,380,000 |
Municipal Bonds | | | — | | | 23,596,400 | | | — | | | 23,596,400 |
Total Investment Securities | | | — | | | 101,976,400 | | | — | | | 101,976,400 |
|
U.S. Government Money Market Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities(a): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government and Government | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agency Obligations | | | — | | | 1,037,223,519 | | | — | | | 1,037,223,519 |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | | — | | | 741,811,987 | | | — | | | 741,811,987 |
Repurchase Agreements | | | — | | | 3,585,000,000 | | | — | | | 3,585,000,000 |
Total Investment Securities | | | — | | | 5,364,035,506 | | | — | | | 5,364,035,506 |
|
U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities(a): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | | — | | | 2,008,832,035 | | | — | | | 2,008,832,035 |
Total Investment Securities | | | — | | | 2,008,832,035 | | | — | | | 2,008,832,035 |
____________________
(a) For detailed investment categorizations, see the accompanying Schedules of Portfolio Investments.
46 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
The Trust recognizes significant transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. There were no significant transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 as of April 30, 2012 from the valuation input levels used on October 31, 2011.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04 (“ASU 2011-04”), “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS”. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Adoption of ASU 2011-04 will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets. At this time, management is currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2011-04 on the financial statements disclosures.
4. Related Party Transactions and Other Agreements and Plans:
Investment Management:
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (“HSBC’’ or the “Investment Adviser’’), a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC Bank USA, N.A., a national bank organized under the laws of the United States, acts as Investment Adviser to the Funds. As Investment Adviser, HSBC manages the investments of the Funds and continuously reviews, supervises and administers the Funds’ investments pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement. For its services as investment adviser, HSBC receives a fee from each Fund, accrued daily and paid monthly, based on the average daily net assets of each respective Fund, at an annual rate of 0.10%.
HSBC also provides operational support services to the Funds pursuant to an Operational Support Services Agreement. For its services in this capacity, HSBC receives a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, based on the average daily net assets of Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares and Class Y Shares, at an annual rate of:
Fund | | Fee Rate(%) |
N.Y. Tax-Free Money Market Fund | 0.05 |
Prime Money Market Fund | 0.10 |
Tax-Free Money Market Fund | 0.10 |
U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 0.10 |
U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund | 0.10 |
The Bank of New York Mellon (the "Servicer") provides recordkeeping, reporting and processing services to the Prime Money Market Fund, U.S. Government Money Market Fund and U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund, Class I Shares. The Servicer is paid by the Investment Adviser from its profits and not by the Funds, for these services.
Administration:
HSBC also serves as Administrator to the Trusts. Under the terms of the Administration Agreement, HSBC received from the Trusts a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of:
Based on Average Daily Net Assets of | | Fee Rate(%) |
Up to $10 billion | 0.0550 |
In excess of $10 billion but not exceeding $20 billion | 0.0350 |
In excess of $20 billion but not exceeding $50 billion | 0.0275 |
In excess of $50 billion | 0.0250 |
The fee breakpoints are determined on the basis of the aggregate average daily net assets of the Trusts. The fee is allocated to each series based upon its proportionate share of the aggregate net assets of the Trusts, subject to certain allocations in cases where one fund invests some or all of its assets in another fund. An amount equal to 50% of the administration fees is deemed to be class specific.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 47
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Pursuant to a Sub-Administration Agreement with HSBC, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., serves as the Trusts’ Sub-Administrator, subject to the general supervision by the Board and HSBC. For these services, Citi is entitled to a fee, payable by HSBC, at an annual rate equivalent to the fee rates set forth above subject to certain reductions associated with services provided to new funds, minus 0.02% which is retained by HSBC. During the period ended April 30, 2012, Citi voluntarily reduced its sub-administration fees by $101,360.
Under a Compliance Services Agreement between the Trusts and Citi (the “CCO Agreement’’), Citi makes an employee available to serve as the Trusts’ Chief Compliance Officer (the “CCO’’). Under the CCO Agreement, Citi also provides infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Trusts’ compliance program, including support services to the CCO. For the services provided under the CCO Agreement, the Trusts paid Citi $140,088 for the period ended April 30, 2012, plus reimbursement of certain out of pocket expenses. Expenses incurred by each Fund are reflected on the Statements of Operations as “Compliance Services.’’ Citi pays the salary and other compensation earned by individuals performing these services, as employees of Citi.
Distribution Arrangements:
Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. (“Foreside’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foreside Financial Group LLC, serves the Trust as Distributor (the “Distributor’’). The Trust has adopted a non-compensatory Distribution Plan and Agreement (the “Distribution Plan’’) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Act. The Distribution Plan provides for reimbursement of expenses incurred by the Distributor related to distribution and marketing, at a rate not to exceed 0.25%, 1.00%, 1.00% and 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class A Shares (currently not being charged), Class B Shares (currently charging 0.75%), Class C Shares (currently charging 0.75%) and Class D Shares (currently not being charged) of the Funds, respectively. For the period ended April 30, 2012, Foreside, as Distributor, also received $179,432, $158,225 and $17,218 in commissions from sales of the Trusts, for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively, of which $25, $6 and $- were reallocated to HSBC-affiliated brokers and dealers for Class A Shares, Class B Shares and Class C Shares, respectively. Expenses reduced during the period ended April 30, 2012 are reflected on the Statements of Operations as “Fees voluntarily reduced by Distributor.’’
Shareholder Servicing:
The Trust has adopted a Shareholder Services Plan, which provides for payments to shareholder servicing agents (which primarily consist of HSBC and its affiliates) for providing various shareholder services. For performing these services, the shareholder servicing agents receive a fee that is computed daily and paid monthly up to 0.60%, 0.25%, 0.25%, 0.25% and 0.10% of the average daily net assets of Class A Shares (currently charging 0.40%), Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares and Class E Shares (expected to charge 0.05%) of the Funds, respectively. The fees paid to the Distributor pursuant to the Distribution Plan and to shareholder servicing agents pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan may not exceed, in the aggregate, 0.85%, 1.00%, 1.00%, 0.50% and 0.10% annually of each Fund’s average daily net assets of Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares, Class D Shares and Class E Shares, respectively. Expenses reduced during the period ended April 30, 2012 are reflected on the Statements of Operations as “Fees voluntarily reduced by Shareholder Servicing Agent.’’
Fund Accounting and Transfer Agency:
Citi provides fund accounting and transfer agency services for each Fund. As transfer agent, Citi receives a fee based on the number of funds and shareholder accounts, subject to certain minimums, reductions associated with services provided to new funds and reimbursement of certain expenses. As fund accountant, Citi receives an annual fee per fund and share class, subject to certain minimums and reimbursement of certain expenses. Citi receives additional fees paid by the Trust for blue sky exemption services and money market fund reporting services.
Independent Trustees:
Prior to January 1, 2012, the Trusts, in the aggregate, paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $63,000, a fee of $5,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended, a fee of $3,000 for each special telephonic meeting attended, and a fee of $5,000 for each special in-person meeting attended. The Trusts also paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $3,000 for each Committee on which such Trustee served as a Committee member as well as a fee of $3,000 for each Committee meeting attended. Additionally, the Trusts paid each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $6,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit Committee, who received a retainer of $8,000. The Trusts also paid Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $20,000, as well as an additional $4,000 for each
48 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
regular meeting of the Board attended. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee was compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
Effective January 1, 2012, the Trusts pay each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $100,000. The Trusts pay a fee of $10,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended and a fee of $3,000 for each special meeting attended. The Trusts pay each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $3,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit Committee, who receives a retainer of $6,000. The Trusts also pay Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $24,000. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee is compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
Fee Reductions:
The Investment Adviser has agreed to contractually limit through March 1, 2013 the annual total expenses, exclusive of interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses, of certain classes of the Prime Money Market Fund, U.S. Government Money Market Fund and U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund. Each Fund Class has its own expense limitations based on the average daily net assets for any full fiscal year as follows:
| | | | Contractual |
| | | | Expense |
Fund | | | Class | | Limitations(%) |
Prime Money Market Fund | | E | | | 0.25 | * |
Prime Money Market Fund | | I | | | 0.20 | |
U.S. Government Money Market Fund | | E | | | 0.25 | * |
U.S. Government Money Market Fund | | I | | | 0.20 | |
U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund | | E | | | 0.25 | * |
U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund | | I | | | 0.20 | |
____________________
* As of April 30, 2012, Class E Shares were not operational.
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Investment Adviser will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Investment Adviser within three years to the extent that the repayment will not cause the Fund’s operating expenses to exceed the contractual expense limit that was in effect at the time of such waiver or reimbursement. At April 30, 2012, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Funds in subsequent years.
The Administrator and Citi may voluntarily waive/reimburse fees to help support the expense limits of the Funds. In addition, the Administrator and Investment Adviser, may waive/reimburse additional fees at their discretion. Any voluntary fee waivers/reimbursements are not subject to recoupment in subsequent fiscal periods. Voluntary waivers/reimbursements may be stopped at any time. Amounts waived/reimbursed by the Investment Adviser, Administrator and Citi are reported separately on the Statements of Operations, as applicable.
The Funds have entered into an arrangement with their custodian whereby credits realized as a result of uninvested cash balances are used to reduce a portion of the Funds’ custodian expenses. Expenses reduced during the period ended April 30, 2012 are reflected on the Statements of Operations as “Fees paid indirectly,” as applicable.
5. Concentration of Credit Risk:
The N.Y. Tax-Free Money Market Fund invests primarily in debt obligations issued by the State of New York and its respective political subdivisions, agencies and public authorities. The Fund is more susceptible to economic and political factors adversely affecting issuers of New York municipal securities than are municipal money market funds that are not concentrated in these issuers to the same extent.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 49
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
6. Federal Income Tax Information:
At April 30, 2012, the cost basis of securities for federal income tax purposes, gross unrealized appreciation, gross unrealized depreciation and net unrealized appreciation/depreciation were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | Net Unrealized |
| | | | | Tax Unrealized | | Tax Unrealized | | Appreciation/ |
Fund | | | Tax Cost($) | | Appreciation($) | | Depreciation($) | | (Depreciation)($)* |
New York Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | $ | 313,421,928 | | — | | — | | — |
Prime Money Market Fund | | | 4,914,996,185 | | — | | — | | — |
Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | | 101,976,400 | | — | | — | | — |
U.S. Government Money Market Fund | | | 5,364,035,506 | | — | | — | | — |
U.S Treasury Money Market Fund | | | 2,008,832,035 | | — | | — | | — |
____________________
* The difference between book-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
The tax character of dividends paid by the Funds as of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011 was as follows:
| | Dividends paid from |
| | | | | | Net | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Long Term | | Total | | Tax | | Total |
| | Ordinary | | Capital | | Taxable | | Exempt | | Dividends |
| | Income | | Gains | | Dividends | | Distributions | | Paid(1) |
New York Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | $ | 32 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 32 | | | $ | 56,516 | | | $ | 56,548 |
Prime Money Market Fund | | | 5,383,471 | | | | — | | | | 5,383,471 | | | | — | | | | 5,383,471 |
Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | | 1,744 | | | | 35 | | | | 1,779 | | | | 13,931 | | | | 15,710 |
U.S. Government Money Market Fund | | | 1,676,040 | | | | — | | | | 1,676,040 | | | | — | | | | 1,676,040 |
U.S Treasury Money Market Fund | | | 348,882 | | | | — | | | | 348,882 | | | | — | | | | 348,882 |
____________________
(1) | Total dividends paid may differ from the amount reported in the Statement of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
As of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis for the Funds were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | Total |
| | Undistributed | | Undistributed | | Undistributed | | | | | | | | | | Capital | | Unrealized | | Accumulated |
| | Ordinary | | Tax Exempt | | Long Term | | Accumulated | | Dividends | | and Other | | Appreciation/ | | Earnings/ |
| | Income | | Income | | Capital Gains | | Earnings | | Payable | | Losses | | (Depreciation) | | (Deficit) |
New York Tax-Free | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money Market Fund | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Prime Money Market Fund | | | 295,650 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 295,650 | | | | (295,650 | ) | | | (13,380 | ) | | | — | | | | (13,380 | ) |
Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | |
U.S. Government | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money Market Fund | | | 79,322 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 79,322 | | | | (33,773 | ) | | | — | | | | (5,806 | ) | | | 39,743 | |
U.S Treasury | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money Market Fund | | | 24,266 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 24,266 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (19,892 | ) | | | 4,374 | |
50 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
As of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the following Funds have net capital loss carryforwards, which are available to offset future realized gains, if any, to the extent provided by the Treasury regulations. To the extent that these carryforwards are used to offset future capital gains, it is probable that the gains that are offset will not be distributed to shareholders.
Fund | | | Amount | | Expires |
Prime Money Market Fund | | $ | 13,380 | | 2016 |
During the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the following Funds utilized capital loss carryforwards to offset capital gains realized:
Fund | | Amount |
Prime Money Market Fund | $ | 186,929 |
U.S. Government Money Market Fund | | 180,513 |
The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “RIC Modernization Act”) was signed into law on December 22, 2010. The RIC Modernization Act makes changes to several tax rules impacting the Funds. The provisions of the RIC Modernization Act will generally be effective for each Fund’s tax year ending October 31, 2012. The RIC Modernization Act allows for capital losses originating in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 (“postenactment capital losses”) to be carried forward indefinitely. However, the RIC Modernization Act requires any future capital gains to be first offset by post-enactment capital losses before using capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning prior to the effective date of the RIC Modernization Act. As a result of this ordering rule, capital loss carryforwards incurred in taxable years beginning prior to the effective date of the RIC Modernization Act have an increased likelihood to expire unused. Furthermore, post-enactment capital losses will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term capital losses as under previous law.
The RIC Modernization Act also contains provisions which are intended to reduce the circumstances under which a regulated investment company would distribute amounts in excess of such income and gains or be required to file amended tax reporting information to its shareholders and the Internal Revenue Service. Information regarding any further effect of the RIC Modernization Act on the Funds, if any, will be contained within the “Federal Taxes” section of the financial statement notes for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2012.
7. Legal and Regulatory Matters:
On September 26, 2006 BISYS Fund Services, Inc. (“BISYS’’), an affiliate of BISYS Fund Services Ohio, Inc. which provided various services to the Funds, reached a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC’’) regarding the SEC’s investigation related to BISYS’ past payment of certain marketing and other expenses with respect to certain of its mutual fund clients. The related settlement monies were received by the Funds during the year ended October 31, 2010. The corresponding impact to the net income ratio and total return for the year ended October 31, 2010 are disclosed in the Funds’ Financial Highlights.
8. Subsequent Events:
Management has evaluated events and transactions through the date the financial statements were available to be issued, for purposes of recognition or disclosure in these financial statements and there are no subsequent events to report.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 51
Investment Adviser Contract Approval
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), generally requires that a majority of the trustees of a mutual fund who are not parties to an investment advisory agreement for the fund or “interested persons” of the fund, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”) review and approve the investment advisory agreement at an in person meeting for an initial period of up to two years and thereafter on an annual basis. A summary of the material factors considered by the Independent Trustees and the Boards of Trustees (the “Board��) of HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds), HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (each, a “Trust”) in connection with approving investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the series of the Trusts (each, a “Fund”) during the semi-annual period ended April 30, 2012 and the conclusions the Independent Trustees and Board made as a result of those considerations are set forth below.
I. Annual Continuation of Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements
The Board met in person on December 15-16, 2011 and the Contracts and Expense Committee thereof, which consists of the Independent Trustees of the Trusts (the “Contracts Committee”), met on November 29 and December 15, 2011 to consider, among other matters:
- the approval of the continuation of the: (i) Investment Advisory Contracts and related Supplements (“Advisory Contracts”) between the Trusts and HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”) and (ii) Sub-Advisory Agreements (“Sub-Advisory Contracts”) between the Adviser and each investment sub-adviser (“Sub-Adviser”) to one or more Funds; and
- the approval of the continuation of certain other ancillary agreements to which the Adviser is a party that obligate the Adviser to provide the Funds with administrative services, such as the Administration Agreement, Support Services Agreement and Operational Support Services Agreement (each, an “Ancillary Agreement”).
Prior to the meetings, the Independent Trustees received and reviewed the information they thought reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Advisory Contracts, Sub-Advisory Contracts and Ancillary Agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”). This information included, among other things, information about: (i) the services that the Adviser and Sub-Advisers provide; (ii) the personnel who provide such services; (iii) investment performance; (iv) trading practices of the Adviser and Sub-Advisers; (v) fees received or to be received by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, including in comparison with the advisory fees paid by other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vi) total expense ratios, including in comparison with the total expense ratios of other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vii) the profitability of the Adviser and certain of the Sub-Advisers; and (viii) compliance-related matters pertaining to the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. Counsel to the Trusts and to the Independent Trustees were present at each Contracts Committee meeting and the Board meeting. In this regard, counsel to the Independent Trustees advised the Independent Trustees with respect to their deliberations during the process and their fiduciary obligations under Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act.
On November 29, 2011, the Contracts Committee convened and its members reviewed the information provided in advance of the meeting and discussed, among other things: (i) the Administration Agreement; (ii) the Trusts’ arrangements with the Sub-Advisers and the Funds advised by the Sub-Advisers; (iii) the fees and performance record of the Funds that are money market funds (“Money Market Funds”); and (iv) compliance matters. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Committee requested certain additional information from the Adviser with respect to other accounts managed by the Adviser and pricing information regarding certain Funds, among other matters. The Contracts Committee also convened on December 15, 2011 to discuss, among other things: (i) the Adviser’s investment advisory arrangements with respect to the Aggressive Strategy Fund, Balanced Strategy Fund, Conservative Strategy Fund, and Moderate Strategy Fund (collectively, the “World Selection Funds”); (ii) the HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund (formerly, HSBC Investor U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund); (iii) certain subadvisory fee breakpoints; (iv) services provided to the Funds under the Ancillary Agreements; and (v) the Adviser’s response to the follow-up questions posed by the Contracts Committee following the November 29, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting. Following the December 15, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting, the members of the Contracts Committee determined to recommend to the Board, including the Independent Trustees, that the Agreements be continued for an additional one-year period.
At the in-person meeting held on December 15-16, 2011, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed the materials and other information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and considered the previous deliberations and recommendation of the Contracts Committee. As a result of this process, the Board and Independent Trustees determined to approve the continuation of the Agreements with respect to each Fund.
52 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Investment Adviser Contract Approval (continued)
The Board and the Independent Trustees made these determinations on the basis of the following considerations, among others:
Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided by Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees examined the nature, quality and extent of the investment advisory and administrative support services provided by the Adviser to the Funds, as well as the quality and experience of the Adviser’s personnel. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Multimanager unit with respect to the World Selection Funds and the equity Funds, the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Emerging Markets Debt Team with respect to the emerging markets debt Funds, as well as the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s portfolio management and credit review teams with respect to the Money Market Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the nature, quality and extent of the administrative support services that the Adviser provides to the Funds, including the Adviser’s oversight and management of the Funds’ other service providers.
The Independent Trustees also took note of: (i) the long-term relationship between the Adviser and the Funds; (ii) the Adviser’s reputation and financial condition; (iii) the reduction during the period in the HSBC Family of Fund’s net assets; (iv) the liquidation of certain Funds; and (v) the efforts undertaken by the Adviser to foster the growth and development of the Funds since the inception of each of the Funds, including the recent development and launch of the HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund and HSBC Frontier Markets Fund. With respect to the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the financial support the Adviser and its affiliates have afforded the Money Market Funds, such as the fee waivers and reimbursements made to maintain a non-negative yield for the Money Market Funds more recently. In addition, the Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s performance in fulfilling its responsibilities for overseeing its own and the Sub-Advisers’ compliance with the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures and investment objectives.
The Independent Trustees also examined the nature, quality and extent of the services that the Sub-Advisers provide to their respective Funds. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the investment performance and the portfolio risk characteristics achieved by the Sub-Advisers and the Sub-Advisers’ portfolio management teams, their experience, and the quality of their compliance programs, among other factors.
Based on these considerations, the Independent Trustees concluded that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, and that the services provided supported continuance of the Agreements.
Investment Performance of the Funds, Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the investment performance of each Fund over various periods of time, as compared to one another as well as to comparable funds and one or more benchmark indices. In the context of the World Selection Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the relative underperformance of the World Selection Funds in light of data provided by Lipper Inc., and representations by the Adviser regarding market factors that contributed to the relative underperformance, as well as their investment outlook. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Growth Portfolio), the Independent Trustees favorably noted the consistent performance record of the Portfolio. In the context of the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the yield support that the Adviser had provided in order for the Money Market Funds to retain non-negative performance. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds’ investment performance and the Adviser’s actions to improve investment performance, where applicable, supported continuance of the Agreements.
Costs of Services and Profits Realized by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the costs of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and the expense ratios of the Funds more generally. The Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s profitability and costs, including by means of an analysis provided by the Adviser of its estimated profitability attributable to its relationship with the Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts and compared those fees to the fees of similar funds, which had been compiled and provided by Lipper Inc. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds had advisory fees competitive with those of similar funds, noting the resources, expertise and experience provided to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also compared the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts with those of other accounts managed by the Adviser, and evaluated information provided as to why advisory fees may differ between mutual funds and other advisory relationships, including increased shareholder activity. In this regard, the Independent Trustees concluded that differences in advisory fees assessed between the Funds and other accounts managed by the Adviser did not preclude approval of the Advisory Contracts.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 53
Investment Adviser Contract Approval (continued)
With respect to the administrative support services provided by the Adviser, the Independent Trustees considered the fees charged for such services and evaluated the fees payable to the Adviser and those payable to other providers of administrative services to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also considered the costs of the services provided by the Sub-Advisers, as applicable; the relative portions of the total advisory fees paid to the Sub-Advisers and retained by the Adviser in its capacity as the Funds’ investment adviser; and the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio, the Independent Trustees considered the subadvisory fee breakpoint structure. The Independent Trustees also considered information on profitability where provided by the Sub-Advisers.
The Independent Trustees concluded that the advisory fees payable to the Adviser and the Funds’ Sub-Advisers were fair and reasonable in light of the factors set forth above.
Other Relevant Considerations. The Independent Trustees also considered the extent to which the Adviser and Sub-Advisers had achieved economies of scale, whether the Funds’ expense structure permits economies of scale to be shared with the Funds’ shareholders and, if so, the extent to which the Funds’ shareholders may benefit from these economies of scale. The Independent Trustees also noted the contractual caps on certain Fund expenses provided by the Adviser with respect to many of the Funds in order to reduce or control the overall operating expenses of those Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered certain information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers with respect to the benefits they may derive from their relationships with the Funds, including the fact that certain Sub-Advisers have “soft dollar” arrangements with respect to Fund brokerage and therefore may have access to research and other permissible services.
In light of the above considerations and such other factors and information it considered relevant, the Board by a unanimous vote of those present in person at the meeting (including a separate unanimous vote of the Independent Trustees present in person at the meeting) approved the continuation of each Agreement.
54 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Table of Shareholder Expenses—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Funds, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, shareholder servicing fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare the cost with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012.
Actual Example
The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
New York Tax-Free Money | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Market Fund | | Class A Shares | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 0.85 | | | 0.17% |
| | Class D Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 0.75 | | | 0.15% |
| | Class Y Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 0.80 | | | 0.16% |
Prime Money Market Fund | | Class A Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.10 | | | | 1.44 | | | 0.29% |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.10 | | | | 1.39 | | | 0.28% |
| | Class C Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.30 | | | | 1.14 | | | 0.23% |
| | Class D Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.10 | | | | 1.39 | | | 0.28% |
| | Class I Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.60 | | | | 0.85 | | | 0.17% |
| | Class Y Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.10 | | | | 1.39 | | | 0.28% |
Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | Class D Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 0.94 | | | 0.19% |
| | Class Y Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 0.90 | | | 0.18% |
U.S. Government Money Market Fund | | Class A Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.10 | | | | 0.65 | | | 0.13% |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.10 | | | | 0.70 | | | 0.14% |
| | Class D Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.10 | | | | 0.70 | | | 0.14% |
| | Class I Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.10 | | | | 0.70 | | | 0.14% |
| | Class Y Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.10 | | | | 0.70 | | | 0.14% |
U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund | | Class A Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 0.25 | | | 0.05% |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 0.30 | | | 0.06% |
| | Class D Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 0.30 | | | 0.06% |
| | Class I Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 0.30 | | | 0.06% |
| | Class Y Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 0.30 | | | 0.06% |
____________________
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 55
Table of Shareholder Expenses—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on each Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees, or exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
New York Tax-Free Money | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Market Fund | | Class A Shares | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,024.02 | | | $ | 0.86 | | | 0.17% |
| | Class D Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.12 | | | | 0.75 | | | 0.15% |
| | Class Y Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.07 | | | | 0.81 | | | 0.16% |
Prime Money Market Fund | | Class A Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.42 | | | | 1.46 | | | 0.29% |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.47 | | | | 1.41 | | | 0.28% |
| | Class C Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.72 | | | | 1.16 | | | 0.23% |
| | Class D Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.47 | | | | 1.41 | | | 0.28% |
| | Class I Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.02 | | | | 0.86 | | | 0.17% |
| | Class Y Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.47 | | | | 1.41 | | | 0.28% |
Tax-Free Money Market Fund | | Class D Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.92 | | | | 0.96 | | | 0.19% |
| | Class Y Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.97 | | | | 0.91 | | | 0.18% |
U.S. Government Money Market Fund | | Class A Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.22 | | | | 0.65 | | | 0.13% |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.17 | | | | 0.70 | | | 0.14% |
| | Class D Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.17 | | | | 0.70 | | | 0.14% |
| | Class I Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.17 | | | | 0.70 | | | 0.14% |
| | Class Y Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.17 | | | | 0.70 | | | 0.14% |
U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund | | Class A Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.61 | | | | 0.25 | | | 0.05% |
| | Class B Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.57 | | | | 0.30 | | | 0.06% |
| | Class D Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.57 | | | | 0.30 | | | 0.06% |
| | Class I Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.57 | | | | 0.30 | | | 0.06% |
| | Class Y Shares | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,024.57 | | | | 0.30 | | | 0.06% |
____________________
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
56 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Other Information:
Information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-525-5757 for HSBC Bank USA and HSBC Brokerage (USA) Inc. clients and 1-800-782-8183 for all other shareholders; (ii) on the Funds’ website at www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com; and (iii) on the Security and Exchange Commission’s (“Commission”) website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Funds file their complete schedules of portfolio holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds’ Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Funds’ Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The Funds’ Schedules of Investments will be available no later than 60 days after each period end, without charge, on the Funds’ website at www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com.
Each Fund will disclose on its website at www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com, within five business days after the end of each month, a complete schedule of portfolio holdings and information regarding the weighted average maturity of the Fund. In addition, each Fund will file with the Commission on Form N-MFP, within five business days after the end of each month, more detailed portfolio holdings information. The Funds’ Forms N-MFP will be available on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, on a delayed basis, and the Funds’ website will also contain a link to these filings.
An investment in a Fund is not a deposit of HSBC Bank USA, National Association, and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 57
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS: INVESTMENT ADVISER AND ADMINISTRATOR HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 SHAREHOLDER SERVICING AGENTS For HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. Clients: HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 1-888-525-5757 For All Other Shareholders: HSBC Funds P.O. Box 182845 Columbus, OH 43218 1-800-782-8183 TRANSFER AGENT Citi Fund Services 3435 Stelzer Road Columbus, OH 43219 DISTRIBUTOR Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. 690 Taylor Road, Suite 150 Gahanna, Ohio 43230 | CUSTODIAN The Northern Trust Company 50 South LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60603INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM KPMG LLP 191 West Nationwide Blvd., Suite 500 Columbus, OH 43215 LEGAL COUNSEL Dechert LLP 1775 I Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f481d/f481dbb516f647a38f9d165aaab8e4b296a82755" alt=""
The HSBC Family of Funds are distributed by Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. This document must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus for the HSBC Funds, which you should read carefully before you invest or send money.
— NOT FDIC INSURED | — NO BANK GUARANTEE | — MAY LOSE VALUE |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75c7c/75c7cda1f223d5f7ece6dbd4fbcacceb07822b20" alt=""
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. April 30, 2012 |
HSBC Funds
Semi-Annual Report
| Class A | | Class I | | Class S |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund | HCGAX | | HCGIX | | HBESX |
| | | | | |
HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | HBMAX | | HBMIX | | HBMSX |
| | | | | |
HSBC Frontier Markets Fund | HSFAX | | HSFIX | | — |
| | | | | |
HSBC Total Return Fund | HTRAX | | HTRIX | | HTRSX |
HSBC Family of Funds
Semi-Annual Report - April 30, 2012
Glossary of Terms | |
Chairman’s Message | 4 |
President’s Message | 6 |
Commentary From the Investment Manager | 7 |
Portfolio Reviews | 8 |
Portfolio Composition | 15 |
Schedules of Portfolio Investments | |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund | 16 |
HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | 19 |
HSBC Frontier Markets Fund | 23 |
HSBC Total Return Fund | 25 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | 27 |
Statements of Operations | 28 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 29 |
Financial Highlights | 33 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 37 |
Investment Adviser Contract Approval | 52 |
Table of Shareholder Expenses | 56 |
Other Information | 58 |
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index generally representative of investment-grade, fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year.
Barclays Capital U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index is an unmanaged index that measures the non-investment grade, USD-denominated, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high-yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. The index excludes emerging markets debt.
Emerging Markets Debt Blend Portfolio Index is a hypothetical combination of unmanaged broad-based indices of equal weightings in the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index–Emerging Markets Global Diversified and J.P. Morgan Emerging Local Markets Index Plus.
J.P. Morgan Emerging Local Markets Index Plus is an unmanaged index that tracks total returns for local-currency-denominated money market instruments in 22 emerging markets countries with at least US$10 billion of external trade.
J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global is an unmanaged index that tracks returns for USD-denominated debt instruments issued by emerging market sovereign and quasi-sovereign entities; Brady bonds, loans, Eurobonds and local market instruments.
J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index – Emerging Markets Global Diversified is an unmanaged comprehensive global emerging markets fixed income index, and consists of regularly traded, liquid fixed-rate, domestic currency government bonds to which international investors can gain exposure.
Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is an unmanaged free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of the following 22 developed market countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets (“MSCI EM”) Index is an unmanaged free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. The MSCI EM Index consists of the following 21 emerging market countries: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey.
Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) Frontier Markets Index is an unmanaged index which captures large- and mid-cap representation across 25 Frontier Markets (FM) countries. The index includes 155 securities, covering about 84% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country.
Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) Frontier Emerging Markets Capped Index is an unmanaged index and was developed for MSCI by HSBC and is a customized capped version of the MSCI Frontier Emerging Markets (FME) Index. The MSCI FME index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index designed to measure equity market performance in all countries from the MSCI Frontier Markets Index and the lower size spectrum of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The Index consists of 25 frontier markets and five emerging markets.
Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index is an unmanaged index that is widely regarded as a gauge of the U.S. equities market. This index includes 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. The S&P 500 Index focuses on the large-cap segment of the market, with approximately 75% coverage of U.S. equities.
Securities indices assume reinvestment of all distributions and interest payments and do not take in account brokerage fees or expenses. Securities in the Funds do not match those in the indices and performance of the Funds will differ. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
June 11, 2012
To Our Investors:
Investors today face a number of troubling macroeconomic issues, including a U.S. economy still struggling to recover from the widespread global downturn that began more than four years ago. Despite modest improvements in certain areas, such as the housing market and corporate profits, the economy still faced major headwinds, particularly from continued weakness in the U.S. job market. A lack of clarity on the economic outlook has led to considerable volatility in the markets: Stocks seem to rally strongly one week only to falter and shed those gains the following week. Meanwhile, conservative assets such as Treasury and money market securities have seen yields fall to historically low levels. These low yields are due in part to Federal Reserve actions designed to keep interest rates low in hopes of jumpstarting the economy.
Europe’s debt woes also are a significant source of worry for investors today. Concerns are mounting that efforts by the European Central Bank and eurozone governments to rein in the region’s debt crisis have been insufficient, and that the specter of economic recession and even default continues to loom over the region. Meanwhile governments in Europe face pressures to address their debt issues while curbing spending. It is unclear how the European debt crisis will play out, but we expect that it may take several years for these issues to unwind.
We are keeping a close watch on potential regulatory changes in the money markets. In response to a period of market illiquidity and disruptions in 2008, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has engaged in an ongoing examination of the money market fund model to determine whether changes are needed. That initiative led to rule changes in 2010, and the possibility of more changes to protect money market funds from the risk of broad-based, large-scale redemptions. Two options under consideration would impose capital requirements and limitations or fees on redemptions, among other restrictions.
The money market fund industry has expressed concerns with these proposals, and it appears that there is insufficient support for additional money market fund reforms among the five SEC commissioners. However, there is the possibility that the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) may intervene in the matter if the SEC does not adopt additional reforms. Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, who is a member of the FSOC, recently expressed his support for increased regulation of money market funds.
At this point, it is not possible to predict where this debate will end and what reform, if any, will ultimately be adopted. We will continue to monitor reform proposals as we work to provide the best money market fund structures and products to meet the needs of our shareholders.
Assets in our money market funds continue to decline due in large part to the historically low yields available in the money markets. HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc., the Funds’ investment advisor, along with the Funds’ other service providers provided yield support of approximately $9.9 million, during the six months’ ended April 30, 2012, to the HSBC Money Market Funds.
4 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Chairman’s Message (continued) |
We are pleased to introduce two new funds in this semi-annual report. The HSBC World Selection Income Strategy Fund and the HSBC Total Return Fund. The Income Strategy Fund seeks to provide current income by investing primarily in underlying funds by utilizing a “fund of funds” structure. The Total Return Fund seeks to maximize total return which is comprised of capital appreciation and income. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing its assets in issuers that are economically tied to emerging market countries.
During the period, due to small asset bases and dwindling investor demand, we liquidated the HSBC Investor Value Fund, the HSBC Investor International Equity and the HSBC Investor Overseas Equity Fund. We continue to review the fund offerings of the HSBC Fund Family to meet the needs of our clients.
Cordially,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba620/ba620cf86336e59ddfac09ce9f5eb0334a1919eb" alt=""
Michael Seely
Chairman, HSBC Funds
This literature must be preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus for the HSBC Funds. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment company carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company. To obtain more information, for clients of HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., please call 1-888-525-5757 or visit www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com. For other investors and prospective investors, please call the Funds directly at 1-888-936-4722 or visit or www.emfunds.us.hsbc.com. Investors should read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 5
Dear Shareholder,
Welcome to the HSBC Funds semi-annual report, covering the period between November 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012. This report offers detailed information about your Funds’ investment results. We encourage you to review it carefully.
Inside these pages you will find a letter from the Funds’ Chairman, Michael Seely, in which he comments on recent market developments. The report also includes commentary from the Funds’ portfolio managers in which they discuss the investment markets and their respective Fund’s performance. Each commentary may also be accompanied by the Fund’s return for the period, listed alongside the returns of its benchmark index and peer group average for comparative purposes.
On March 20 of this year we launched the World Selection Income Strategy Fund. This Fund adds an income-oriented strategy to the World Selection suite of funds, which includes the Aggressive Strategy, Balanced Strategy, Moderate Strategy, and Conservative Strategy Funds.
On March 30, we also launched the HSBC Total Return Fund. The launch of this fund further expands on our offerings in the emerging markets – one of HSBC’s core strengths. The Total Return Fund joins the Emerging Markets Debt Fund, the Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund, and the Frontier Markets Fund as our initial fund offerings in this exciting segment of the investment market
In closing, we would like to thank you for investing through the HSBC Funds. We continue to focus the HSBC Fund Family on long-term investment solutions to assist our customers in reaching their financial goals. We appreciate the trust you place in us, and will continue working to earn it. Please contact us at any time with questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f73f/7f73f9b0a44090362529a6aca5e4386a5248f6ad" alt=""
Richard A. Fabietti
President
6 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Commentary From the Investment Manager |
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc.
U.S. Economic Review
The global economy’s recovery from a historic downturn regained momentum during the six-month period between November 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012 after slowing throughout much of 2011. Moderate economic growth was fueled by increased consumer confidence, improved U.S. economic data, continued strength in emerging economies and better-than-expected corporate earnings. The economic recovery continued to benefit from the Federal Reserve Board’s pledge to maintain the federal funds rate—a key factor in lending rates—at a historically low target range between 0.00% and 0.25% through 2014.
As the period began, ongoing concerns about the eurozone debt crisis continued to fuel fears of a new global recession. However, financial markets underwent a significant shift from the volatile and bearish events of the previous six months. Fears about Europe began to subside somewhat during the first months of 2012, due in part to efforts by the European Central Bank (ECB) to stabilize the region’s banking system through infusions of capital. Meanwhile, moderate economic growth in the U.S. and, although slowing, still relatively strong growth in emerging markets helped assuage fears of a global economic downturn.
The ECB efforts to stem a liquidity crisis in European nations during the period helped alleviate fears of deepening credit problems in the eurozone. In December, the ECB began distributing inexpensive loans to European banks as part of its long-term refinancing operation (LTRO) and in March began making similar loans from an even larger pool of funds. The LTRO appeared to stabilize financial markets in the short term, but significant uncertainties remained regarding the long-term prospects of peripheral European economies to regain their competitiveness and avoid the threat of defaults. The ability of countries such as Italy, Greece and Spain to regain the confidence of the markets remained in doubt, and the long-term impact of austerity programs on economic growth also raised concerns.
Growth remained robust in many emerging economies during the period, and inflation, which had been a significant concern in previous months, eased in some nations. Economic growth in China slowed due to declining exports and industrial production as well as low levels of lending. But most signs indicated that robust domestic demand would prevent a “hard landing” for the Chinese economy. Oil prices eased somewhat during the period.
U.S. Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”)1 grew at 3.0% during the fourth quarter of 2011, a significant increase from the previous quarter. A preliminary estimate puts GDP during the first quarter at 1.9%. Job creation was robust during much of the period, and jobless claims continued a generally downward trend. However, unemployment remained relatively high. The housing market showed signs of improvement. Home sales began to stabilize and inventories began to decrease. Meanwhile, encouraging economic data bolstered the recovery. Reports showed that motor vehicle sales were strong, U.S. exports had accelerated and industrial production had increased.
Market Review
The period began with the final stretch of a sell-off in U.S. equity markets that had begun in mid-summer. After bottoming out in late November, equities changed direction with a strong rally that persisted through the duration of the period. Equities’ strong performance during the period was supported by increased optimism that the U.S. would avoid a “double dip” recession—a threat that preoccupied investors in 2011. During the period, stocks in cyclical sectors tended to perform best, while more defensive sectors lagged behind.
Stocks in other developed economies rose, too. Japanese equities performed especially well due to a strong economic rebound during the first quarter of 2012. European stocks made gains, but lagged behind U.S. markets. The S&P 500 Index1 of large-company stocks returned 12.77% for the six months ended April 2012. The MSCI EAFE Index1 of developed foreign markets returned 2.71% for the period as a whole, while the MSCI EM Index1 returned 4.02%.
Among fixed-income securities, yields on U.S. Treasury bonds increased during the period, sending prices lower. Investment grade corporate bonds showed strength, as investors sought additional yield in a low interest rate environment. High-yield bonds performed especially well as their yield spread over U.S. Treasuries declined during the period. Fixed-income markets in emerging economies performed well, as investors became more confident in the credit worthiness of emerging nations and were attracted to the additional yield of such securities. The Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, which tracks the broad investment-grade fixed-income market, returned 2.44% for the six months ended April 30, 2012, while the Barclays Capital U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index1 returned 6.91%.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 7
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund (Class A Shares, Class I Shares and Class S Shares) by Guillermo Osses, Managing Director, Head of Emerging Markets Debt Portfolio Management |
The HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund (the “Fund”) seeks to maximize total return (comprised of capital appreciation and income). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in fixed income instruments of issuers that economically are tied to emerging markets. The Fund will invest in instruments issued by foreign governments and corporations. Investments will generally be made in U.S. dollar denominated instruments, but the Fund will also seek to invest in emerging market local currency denominated instruments.
Investment Concerns
Equity securities (stocks) are more volatile and carry more risk than other forms of investments, including investments in high-grade fixed income securities.
Bond funds will tend to experience smaller fluctuations in value than stock funds. However, investors in any bond fund should anticipate fluctuations in price, especially for longer term issues and in environments of rising interest rates. Investments in a bond fund are subject to possible loss due to the financial failure of underlying securities and their inability to meet their client obligations.
High yield, lower rated securities involve greater price volatility and present greater risk than higher rated fixed income securities. At times, due to market conditions, the Fund may be unable to sell certain of its portfolio securities without a substantial drop in price. Prices of fixed income securities are generally inversely correlated to interest rates. Investments in the Fund are subject to possible loss due to the financial failure of underlying securities and their inability to meet their debt obligations. These risks may increase the Fund’s share price volatility.
International investing involves increased risk and volatility. An investment in international funds entails the special risks of international investing, including currency exchange fluctuation, government regulations, and the potential for political and economic instability.
Prices of securities in emerging markets can fluctuate more significantly than the prices of companies in more developed countries. Securities of emerging market issuers generally have more risk than securities issued by issuers in more developed markets. The less developed the country, the greater affect the risks may have on an investment, and as a result, an investment may exhibit a higher degree of volatility than either the general domestic securities market or the securities markets of developed foreign countries.
Derivatives may be riskier than other types of investments and could result in losses that significantly exceed the Fund’s original investment.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Market Commentary
The Fund returned 7.36% (without sales charge) for the Class A Shares and 7.41% for the Class I Shares and the Fund’s benchmark, the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global1, for the six-months ended April 30, 2012, returned 7.33%.
Portfolio Performance
Positive market sentiment and encouraging economic data supported a rally in emerging markets debt assets from the end of 2011 through February 2012. The Fund benefited from this momentum as risk was added to the Fund in early 2012. During this rally, more volatile countries were strong performers and the Fund’s positions in these countries, especially Venezuela and Argentina, contributed to absolute performance.
The Fund’s outperformance of the benchmark during the period was due in part to overweight positions in Latin American countries, including Brazil, which benefitted from the continued inflows into the emerging market hard currency space. The Fund’s overweight position in Mexico contributed to the Fund’s relative performance due to the correlation of Mexican debt to U.S. 10-year Treasury yields, which tightened during the period. The Fund’s underweight position in Hungary boosted the Fund’s relative performance as the country was negatively impacted by the crisis in Europe.*
The Fund’s exposure to emerging markets local currencies, which are not included in the benchmark, contributed to relative performance. Emerging market local currencies appreciated during the period and showed strong returns in early 2012. Additionally, the Fund’s exposure to corporate bonds, which also are not included in the benchmark, added to performance. This was partly due to the spread compression of corporate bonds relative to U.S. Treasuries.*
The Fund’s performance relative to its benchmark was diminished by an overweight position in Turkey, since the eurozone crisis and unrest in the Middle East negatively impacted the country in late 2011. The Fund’s overweight position to Indonesia hurt performance as a result of weaker technicals due to strong new issuance in April 2012 that outpaced market demand.*
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
8 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund |
| | | | | | | | Average Annual | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Ratio (%)3 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | Since | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Inception | | Gross | | Net |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A1 | | 4/7/11 | | | 2.27 | | | | 6.80 | | | | 6.91 | | | 1.47 | | 1.20 |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I | | 4/7/11 | | | 7.41 | | | | 12.49 | | | | 12.28 | | | 1.12 | | 0.85 |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class S | | 4/7/11 | | | 7.46 | | | | 12.59 | | | | 12.39 | | | 1.02 | | 0.75 |
J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global2 | | — | | | 7.33 | | | | 13.00 | | | | 13.05 | | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect the taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower. Currently, contractual fee waivers are in effect for the Fund through March 1, 2013.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | Reflects the maximum sales charge of 4.75%. |
2 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
3 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. has entered into a contractual expense limitation agreement with the Fund under which it will limit total expenses of the Fund (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, extraordinary expenses and estimated indirect expenses attributable to the Fund’s investments in investment companies) to an annual rate of 1.20%, 0.85% and 0.75% for Class A Shares, Class I Shares and Class S Shares, respectively. The expense limitation shall be in effect until March 1, 2013. Additional information pertaining to the April 30, 2012 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights. |
The Fund’s performance is measured against the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global, an unmanaged index that tracks returns for USD-denominated debt instruments issued by emerging market and sovereign quasi-sovereign entities; Brady bonds, loans, Eurobonds and local market markets. The performance of the index does not reflect the deduction of expenses associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 9
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (Class A Shares, Class I Shares and Class S Shares) by Guillermo Osses, Managing Director, Head of Emerging Markets Debt Portfolio Management |
The HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (the “Fund”) seeks maximum total return (comprised of capital appreciation and income). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus borrowings for investment purposes, in debt instruments issued by foreign governments, government agencies or corporations and denominated in local currencies of countries with emerging securities markets. The Fund may also invest in instruments denominated in U.S. dollars.
Investment Concerns
Equity securities (stocks) are more volatile and carry more risk than other forms of investments, including investments in high-grade fixed income securities.
Bond funds will tend to experience smaller fluctuations in value than stock funds. However, investors in any bond fund should anticipate fluctuations in price, especially for longer term issues and in environments of rising interest rates. Investments in a bond fund are subject to possible loss due to the financial failure of underlying securities and their inability to meet their client obligations.
High yield, lower rated securities involve greater price volatility and present greater risk than higher rated fixed income securities. At times, due to market conditions, the Fund may be unable to sell certain of its portfolio securities without a substantial drop in price. Prices of fixed income securities are generally inversely correlated to interest rates. Investments in the Fund are subject to possible loss due to the financial failure of underlying securities and their inability to meet their debt obligations. These risks may increase the Fund’s share price volatility.
International investing involves increased risk and volatility. An investment in international funds entails the special risks of international investing, including currency exchange fluctuation, government regulations, and the potential for political and economic instability.
Prices of securities in emerging markets can fluctuate more significantly than the prices of companies in more developed countries. Securities of emerging market issuers generally have more risk than securities issued by issuers in more developed markets. The less developed the country, the greater affect the risks may have on an investment, and as a result, an investment may exhibit a higher degree of volatility than either the general domestic securities market or the securities markets of developed foreign countries.
Derivatives may be riskier than other types of investments and could result in losses that significantly exceed the Fund’s original investment.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Market Commentary
The Fund returned 2.71% (without sales charge) for the Class A Shares and 2.87% for the Class I Shares for the six-months ended April 30, 2012. That compared to a 2.67% total return for the Fund’s primary performance benchmarks, a blended index, which is comprised of equal weightings in the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets Global Diversified1 and the J.P. Morgan Emerging Local Markets Index Plus1. The J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index–Emerging Markets Global Diversified returned 4.05%, and the J.P. Morgan Emerging Local Markets Index Plus returned 1.28%, for the period, respectively.
Portfolio Performance
Emerging markets local debt assets rallied during the first two months of 2012. The majority of the Fund’s gains during the six-month period came during those two months, as attractive valuations and positive economic data encouraged investors to increase their risk positions. The most significant drag on the Fund’s absolute performance during the period came in November, when speculators significantly increased their short emerging market currency positions, causing those currencies to depreciate.
The Fund’s overweight position in Hungary relative to the Fund’s benchmark from November through February was a significant contributor to outperformance. The country’s currency benefitted from discussions between the Hungarian government and the International Monetary Fund regarding financial assistance. The Fund’s position in the Mexican peso contributed to performance, due in part to the country’s correlation to the U.S. economy, which proved stronger than expected in the period. The U.S. economy was resilient during the period.*
The Fund’s position in Brazil detracted from performance during the period. Brazil performed poorly in both the local rates and currency markets due to the deteriorating current account deficit as well as over-valuations. The Fund was hurt by underweight positions in the Polish zloty and the Russian ruble. These currencies were among several European currencies that performed better than market expectations due to the successful long-term refinancing operation by the European Central Bank.*
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
10 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund |
| | | | | | | | Average Annual | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | | | | | Total Return (%) | | Ratio (%)3 |
| | Inception | | Six | | 1 | | Since | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Year | | Inception | | Gross | | Net |
HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A1 | | 4/7/11 | | | -2.21 | | | | -7.45 | | | | -5.11 | | | 1.75 | | 1.28 |
HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class I | | 4/7/11 | | | 2.87 | | | | -2.46 | | | | -0.31 | | | 1.40 | | 0.93 |
HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class S | | 4/7/11 | | | 2.91 | | | | -2.37 | | | | 7.85 | | | 1.30 | | 0.83 |
Emerging Markets Debt Blend Portfolio Index2 | | — | | | 2.67 | | | | -3.17 | | | | -0.58 | | | N/A | | N/A |
J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index–Emerging Markets Global Diversified2 | | — | | | 4.05 | | | | -0.28 | | | | 2.38 | | | N/A | | N/A |
J.P. Morgan Emerging Local Markets Index Plus2 | | — | | | 1.28 | | | | -6.03 | | | | -3.51 | | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect the taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower. Currently, contractual fee waivers are in effect for the Fund through March 1, 2013.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | Reflects the maximum sales charge of 4.75%. |
2 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
3 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. has entered into a contractual expense limitation agreement with the Fund under which it will limit total expenses of the Fund (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, extraordinary expenses and estimated indirect expenses attributable to the Fund’s investments in investment companies) to an annual rate of 1.20%, 0.85% and 0.75% for Class A Shares, Class I Shares and Class S Shares, respectively. The expense limitation shall be in effect until March 1, 2013. The expense ratios reflected include Acquired Fund fees and expenses. Additional information pertaining to the April 30, 2012 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights. |
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Emerging Markets Debt Blend Portfolio Index, which is a hypothetical combination of unmanaged broad-based indices of equal weightings in the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index–Emerging Markets Global Diversified and J.P. Morgan Emerging Local Markets Index Plus. The performance of the indexes does not reflect the deduction of expenses associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 11
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Frontier Markets Fund (Class A Shares and Class I Shares) by Andrew Brudenell, Senior Portfolio Manager |
The HSBC Frontier Markets Fund (the “Fund”) seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in issuers located in “frontier market countries”. The term “frontier market countries” encompasses those countries that are at an earlier stage of economic, political or financial development, even by emerging markets standards.
Investment Concerns
Equity securities (stocks) are more volatile and carry more risk than other forms of investments, including investments in high-grade fixed income securities.
Foreign securities can be subject to greater risks than U.S. investments, including currency fluctuations, less liquid trading markets, greater price volatility, political and economic instability, less publicly available information, and changes in tax or currency laws or monetary policy. These risks are likely to be greater for emerging markets than in developed markets.
Frontier market countries generally have smaller economies and even less developed capital markets or legal and political systems than traditional emerging market countries. As a result, the risks of investing in emerging market countries are magnified in frontier market countries. The magnification of risks are the result of: the potential for extreme price volatility and illiquidity in frontier markets; government ownership or control of parts of private sector and of certain companies; trade barriers, exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which frontier market countries trade; and the relatively new and unsettled securities laws in many frontier market countries.
Prices of securities in emerging markets can fluctuate more significantly than the prices of companies in more developed countries. Securities of emerging market issuers generally have more risk than securities issued by issuers in more developed markets. The less developed the country, the greater affect the risks may have on an investment, and as a result, an investment may exhibit a higher degree of volatility than either the general domestic securities market or the securities markets of developed foreign countries.
Derivatives may be riskier than other types of investments and could result in losses that significantly exceed the Fund’s original investment.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Market Commentary
The Fund returned 9.02% (without sales charge) for the Class A Shares and 9.12% for the Class I Shares for the six-months ended April 30, 2012. That compared to a 0.52% total return for the MSCI Frontier Markets Index1 and a 5.15% total return for the MSCI Frontier Emerging Markets Capped Index1 for the same period, respectively.
Portfolio Performance
Frontier markets faced several challenges early in the six-month period under review, including the continued fallout from the European debt crisis and a potential hard landing for China’s economy. These global issues led to a lower risk appetite among investors, which in turn resulted in negative performance among frontier markets. However, these issues subsided somewhat in the beginning of the year, and investors moved towards the relatively low valuations among frontier markets equities. That led to strong performance for such stocks, and helped boost the Fund’s absolute performance for the period.
The Fund employs a bottom-up strategy that favors stocks with strong fundamentals. As a result, much of the Fund’s performance relative to its benchmarks is due to individual stock selection.
The Fund’s relative returns benefited primarily from individual holdings in Mozambique, Kuwait and Pakistan. In Mozambique, an oil and gas exploration and production company reported successful exploration results and was the target of an acquisition by a major international energy firm which led to a sharp rise in its stock price. In Kuwait, the Fund benefited from a real estate company that delivered strong financial results during the period. Though the Fund held an underweight in Kuwait compared to its benchmark, this holding helped the Fund’s relative performance. The Fund’s exposure to certain Pakistan-based financial firms helped boost relative performance. These firms posted strong financial results due in part to a more stable political environment in that country.*
The Fund’s relative performance was hurt primarily by individual holdings in Oman, and by an underweight position in Vietnam. In Oman, exposure to a poor-performing financial stock hurt relative performance. Due to expensive valuations, the Fund was underweight to Vietnam, which negatively impacted relative performance as Vietnam was one of the top performing markets for the period.*
* Portfolio composition is subject to change.
1 For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
12 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Frontier Markets Fund |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Expense |
Fund Performance | | | | Total Return (%) | | Ratio (%)3 |
| | Inception | | Six | | Since | | | | |
As of April 30, 2012 | | Date | | Months* | | Inception | | Gross | | Net |
HSBC Frontier Markets Fund Class A1 | | 9/6/11 | | | 3.56 | | | | 0.02 | | | 3.07 | | 2.20 |
HSBC Frontier Markets Fund Class I | | 9/6/11 | | | 9.12 | | | | 5.52 | | | 2.72 | | 1.85 |
MSCI Frontier Markets Index2 | | — | | | 0.52 | | | | -0.73 | | | N/A | | N/A |
MSCI Frontier Emerging Markets Capped Index2 | | — | | | 5.15 | | | | 7.48 | | | N/A | | N/A |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. Total return figures include change in share price, reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and do not reflect the taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemption of Fund shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-782-8183.
The performance above reflects any fee waivers that have been in effect during the applicable periods, as well as any expense reimbursements that have periodically been made. Absent such waivers and reimbursements, returns would have been lower. Currently, contractual fee waivers are in effect for the Fund through March 1, 2013.
* | Aggregate total return. |
1 | Reflects the maximum sales charge of 5.00%. |
2 | For additional information, please refer to the Glossary of Terms. |
3 | Reflects the expense ratio as reported in the prospectus dated February 28, 2012. HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. has entered into a contractual expense limitation agreement with the Fund under which it will limit total expenses of the Fund (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, extraordinary expenses and estimated indirect expenses attributable to the Fund’s investments in investment companies) to an annual rate of 1.20% and 0.85% for Class A Shares and Class I Shares, respectively. The expense limitation shall be in effect until March 1, 2013. Additional information pertaining to the April 30, 2012 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights. |
The performance of the Fund is measured against the MSCI Frontier Markets Index and the MSCI Frontier Emerging Markets Capped Index. The Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) Frontier Markets Index captures large- and mid-cap representation across 26 Frontier Markets (FM) countries. The index includes 155 securities, covering about 84% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. The MSCI Frontier Emerging Markets Capped Index was developed for MSCI by HSBC and is a customized capped version of the MSCI Frontier Emerging Markets (FEM) Index. The MSCI FEM Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index designed to measure equity market performance in all countries from the MSCI Frontier Markets Index and the lower size spectrum of the MSCI EM Index. The Index consists of 25 frontier markets and five emerging markets. The indexes are unmanaged and the performance of the indexes does not reflect the deduction of expenses associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 13
Portfolio Reviews (Unaudited) |
HSBC Total Return Fund (Class A Shares, Class I Shares and Class S Shares) by Guillermo Ossés, Managing Director, Head of Emerging Markets Debt Portfolio Management Lisa Chua, CFA, Senior Vice President, Portfolio Manager Srinivas (Vas) Paruchuri, PhD., Vice President, Portfolio Manager Binqi Liu, Assistant Vice President, Portfolio Manager Phil Yuhn, Senior Vice President, Portfolio Engineer |
The HSBC Total Fund (the “Fund”) seeks maximum total return (comprised of capital appreciation and income). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests its assets (excluding U.S. cash and U.S. cash equivalents) primarily in instruments of issuers that are economically tied to emerging market countries, including in derivative instruments such as futures (including interest rate futures), forwards (including non-deliverable forwards), swaps (including interest rate and total return swaps), options (including interest rate options), swaptions and credit default swaps.
Investment Concerns
Equity securities (stocks) are more volatile and carry more risk than other forms of investments, including investments in high-grade fixed income securities.
Bond funds will tend to experience smaller fluctuations in value than stock funds. However, investors in any bond fund should anticipate fluctuations in price, especially for longer term issues and in environments of rising interest rates. Investments in a bond fund are subject to possible loss due to the financial failure of underlying securities and their inability to meet their client obligations.
High yield, lower rated securities involve greater price volatility and present greater risk than higher rated fixed income securities. At times, due to market conditions, the Fund may be unable to sell certain of its portfolio securities without a substantial drop in price. Prices of fixed income securities are generally inversely correlated to interest rates. Investments in the Fund are subject to possible loss due to the financial failure of underlying securities and their inability to meet their debt obligations. These risks may increase the Fund’s share price volatility.
International investing involves increased risk and volatility. An investment in international funds entails the special risks of international investing, including currency exchange fluctuation, government regulations, and the potential for political and economic instability.
Prices of securities in emerging markets can fluctuate more significantly than the prices of companies in more developed countries. Securities of emerging market issuers generally have more risk than securities issued by issuers in more developed markets. The less developed the country, the greater affect the risks may have on an investment, and as a result, an investment may exhibit a higher degree of volatility than either the general domestic securities market or the securities markets of developed foreign countries.
Derivatives may be riskier than other types of investments and could result in losses that significantly exceed the Fund’s original investment.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investment in a mutual fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Principal Investment Strategies
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective, under normal market conditions, by investing its assets (excluding U.S. cash and U.S. cash equivalents) primarily in instruments of issuers that are economically tied to emerging market countries (as defined below), including in derivative instruments such as futures (including interest rate futures), forwards (including non-deliverable forwards), swaps (including interest rate and total return swaps), options (including interest rate options), swaptions and credit default swaps. The Fund may not be invested in all of these types of derivatives at all times. In addition to derivatives, these instruments include exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), investment-grade and high yield securities (“junk bonds”), convertible bonds and equity and equity equivalent securities as further described below. The Fund may engage in short sales, including taking short positions on forwards.
The Fund will invest in instruments that are issued or guaranteed by governments of emerging market countries and corporations that are economically tied to an emerging market country. Investments will be made in emerging market local currency denominated instruments and in instruments denominated in the currency of a member country of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”). The “total return” sought by the Fund consists of income earned on investment, plus capital appreciation, if any, which generally arises from decreases in interest rates, foreign currency appreciation, or improving credit fundamentals for a particular country, sector or security.
The Fund will also invest in derivative instruments whose returns are based on the returns of instruments of issuers that are economically tied to emerging market countries or that are issued or guaranteed by governments of emerging market countries, rather than investing directly in such instruments, in order to enhance return. The Fund will also invest in derivative instruments for hedging purposes, including to hedge certain of its exposure to non-U.S. currencies, and for tax-advantaged access to instruments.
14 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Portfolio Composition*
April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund† | |
Country | | Percentage of Investments at Value(%) |
Mexico | | | 13.1 | |
Indonesia | | | 11.3 | |
Venezuela | | | 10.5 | |
Russian Federation | | | 10.4 | |
Turkey | | | 9.7 | |
Brazil | | | 9.4 | |
Philippines | | | 4.7 | |
Colombia | | | 4.5 | |
South Africa | | | 3.1 | |
Panama | | | 3.0 | |
Kazakhstan | | | 2.4 | |
Peru | | | 2.3 | |
Poland | | | 1.8 | |
United States | | | 1.7 | |
Ukraine | | | 1.6 | |
Lithuania | | | 1.5 | |
Malaysia | | | 1.4 | |
Uruguay | | | 1.4 | |
Luxembourg | | | 1.3 | |
El Salvador | | | 0.6 | |
Hungary | | | 0.6 | |
Chile | | | 0.6 | |
Ireland (Republic of) | | | 0.5 | |
Sri Lanka | | | 0.5 | |
Croatia | | | 0.5 | |
Argentina | | | 0.5 | |
Dominican Republic | | | 0.3 | |
Romania | | | 0.3 | |
China | | | 0.3 | |
Pakistan | | | 0.2 | |
| | | 100.0 | |
| |
HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund† | |
Country | | Percentage of Investments at Value(%) |
South Africa | | | 21.4 | |
Poland | | | 12.5 | |
Turkey | | | 11.3 | |
Malaysia | | | 10.2 | |
Indonesia | | | 9.7 | |
Russian Federation | | | 8.9 | |
Mexico | | | 8.7 | |
Thailand | | | 7.2 | |
Hungary | | | 2.7 | |
Luxembourg | | | 1.6 | |
Brazil | | | 1.6 | |
Kazakhstan | | | 1.5 | |
Peru | | | 1.4 | |
United Arab Emirates | | | 1.3 | |
| | | 100.0 | |
| | | | |
HSBC Frontier Markets Fund† | |
Country | | Percentage of Investments at Value(%) |
Qatar | | | 11.6 | |
Nigeria | | | 10.9 | |
United Arab Emirates | | | 10.1 | |
Colombia | | | 7.9 | |
Pakistan | | | 6.7 | |
Kazakhstan | | | 6.3 | |
Kuwait | | | 6.0 | |
Philippines | | | 5.3 | |
Peru | | | 4.2 | |
Kenya | | | 3.9 | |
Oman | | | 3.3 | |
Egypt | | | 3.2 | |
Argentina | | | 2.3 | |
Slovenia | | | 2.2 | |
Bangladesh | | | 2.0 | |
Sri Lanka | | | 1.7 | |
Saudi Arabia | | | 1.7 | |
United Kingdom | | | 1.6 | |
Panama | | | 1.5 | |
Lebanon | | | 1.4 | |
Estonia | | | 1.4 | |
Cambodia | | | 1.2 | |
Romania | | | 0.9 | |
Vietnam | | | 0.9 | |
Croatia | | | 0.8 | |
Canada | | | 0.5 | |
Australia | | | 0.5 | |
| | | 100.0 | |
| |
HSBC Total Return Fund† | | | | |
Country | | Percentage of Investments at Value(%) |
Mexico | | | 22.7 | |
Brazil | | | 13.9 | |
United States | | | 12.8 | |
Russian Federation | | | 12.3 | |
Colombia | | | 9.7 | |
Luxembourg | | | 8.3 | |
Indonesia | | | 7.8 | |
Cayman Islands | | | 4.4 | |
Peru | | | 4.1 | |
Turkey | | | 4.0 | |
| | | 100.0 | |
____________________
* | | Portfolio composition is subject to change. |
† | | Excludes any instruments used for cash management. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 15 |
HSBC EMERGING MARKETS DEBT FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Yankee Dollars – 95.1% | | | | |
| | Principal | | |
| | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Argentina – 0.4% | | | | |
Republic of Argentina, 2.50%, 12/31/38 (a) | | 520,000 | | 175,500 |
|
Brazil – 9.1% | | | | |
Banco ABC Brasil SA, 7.88%, 4/8/20 | | 100,000 | | 105,000 |
Banco BMG SA, 9.15%, 1/15/16 | | 280,000 | | 272,300 |
Banco do Brasil SA, Registered, | | | | |
5.88%, 1/26/22 | | 450,000 | | 468,000 |
Banco Votorantim, Registered, | | | | |
5.25%, 2/11/16, MTN | | 200,000 | | 206,000 |
Banco Votorantim, Registered, | | | | |
7.38%, 1/21/20 | | 100,000 | | 108,000 |
Federal Republic of Brazil, 4.88%, 1/22/21 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,148,000 |
Federal Republic of Brazil, 8.75%, 2/4/25 | | 450,000 | | 688,500 |
Federal Republic of Brazil, 8.25%, 1/20/34 | | 100,000 | | 154,500 |
Petrobras International Finance Co., | | | | |
5.75%, 1/20/20 | | 400,000 | | 446,463 |
| | | | 3,596,763 |
|
Chile – 0.6% | | | | |
Empresa Nacional De Petroleo, Registered, | | | | |
4.75%, 12/6/21 | | 220,000 | | 227,444 |
|
China – 0.3% | | | | |
Country Garden Holdings Co. Ltd., | | | | |
Registered, 11.25%, 4/22/17, | | | | |
Callable 4/22/14 @ 105.62 | | 100,000 | | 100,750 |
|
Colombia – 4.3% | | | | |
Bancolombia SA, 5.95%, 6/3/21 | | 100,000 | | 106,250 |
Republic of Colombia, 7.38%, 1/27/17 | | 350,000 | | 433,300 |
Republic of Colombia, 4.38%, 7/12/21 | | 500,000 | | 552,500 |
Republic of Colombia, 8.13%, 5/21/24 | | 300,000 | | 428,700 |
Republic of Colombia, 6.13%, 1/18/41 | | 150,000 | | 189,450 |
| | | | 1,710,200 |
|
Croatia – 0.5% | | | | |
Croatia, Registered, 6.38%, 3/24/21 | | 200,000 | | 196,000 |
|
Dominican Republic – 0.3% | | | | |
Dominican Republic, 7.50%, 5/6/21 | | 100,000 | | 105,350 |
|
El Salvador – 0.6% | | | | |
Republic of El Salvador, 7.75%, 1/24/23 | | 225,000 | | 246,713 |
|
Hungary – 0.6% | | | | |
Republic of Hungary, 6.38%, 3/29/21 | | 250,000 | | 240,000 |
|
Indonesia – 11.0% | | | | |
Majapahit Holding BV, 8.00%, 8/7/19 | | 225,000 | | 268,875 |
Pertamina PT, Registered, 4.88%, 5/3/22 | | 200,000 | | 199,200 |
Republic of Indonesia, 7.25%, 4/20/15 | | 700,000 | | 791,000 |
Republic of Indonesia, 7.50%, 1/15/16 | | 200,000 | | 232,500 |
Republic of Indonesia, 6.88%, 1/17/18 | | 575,000 | | 679,219 |
Republic of Indonesia, 5.88%, 3/13/20 | | 1,350,000 | | 1,539,000 |
Republic of Indonesia, 4.88%, 5/5/21 | | 600,000 | | 645,000 |
| | | | 4,354,794 |
|
Ireland (Republic of) – 0.5% | | | | |
Vnesheconombank, Registered, | | | | |
5.38%, 2/13/17 | | 200,000 | | 208,500 |
|
Kazakhstan – 2.3% | | | | |
Development Bank of Kazakhstan, | | | | |
5.50%, 12/20/15 | | 525,000 | | 560,437 |
KazMunayGas National Co., 6.38%, 4/9/21 | | 325,000 | | 361,875 |
| | | | 922,312 |
|
Lithuania – 1.5% | | | | |
Republic of Lithuania, 5.13%, 9/14/17 | | 350,000 | | 365,750 |
Republic of Lithuania, Registered, | | | | |
6.63%, 2/1/22 | | 200,000 | | 224,000 |
| | | | 589,750 |
|
Luxembourg – 1.2% | | | | |
Gaz Capital SA, Registered, | | | | |
8.13%, 7/31/14 | | 300,000 | | 332,628 |
Gaz Capital SA, Registered, | | | | |
9.25%, 4/23/19 | | 125,000 | | 155,625 |
| | | | 488,253 |
|
Malaysia – 1.4% | | | | |
Petronas Capital Ltd., 5.25%, 8/12/19 | | 475,000 | | 539,876 |
|
Mexico – 12.7% | | | | |
BBVA Bancomer SA Texas, Registered, | | | | |
6.50%, 3/10/21 | | 375,000 | | 378,750 |
Petroleos Mexicanos, 5.50%, 1/21/21 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,113,000 |
Petroleos Mexicanos, Registered, | | | | |
4.88%, 1/24/22 | | 150,000 | | 159,919 |
United Mexican States, Series A, | | | | |
5.13%, 1/15/20, MTN | | 1,520,000 | | 1,776,880 |
United Mexican States, 3.63%, 3/15/22 | | 450,000 | | 469,800 |
United Mexican States, Series A, | | | | |
7.50%, 4/8/33, MTN | | 100,000 | | 143,000 |
United Mexican States, Series A, | | | | |
6.05%, 1/11/40 | | 800,000 | | 998,000 |
| | | | 5,039,349 |
|
Pakistan – 0.2% | | | | |
Islamic Republic of Pakistan, | | | | |
6.88%, 6/1/17 | | 100,000 | | 77,000 |
|
Panama – 2.9% | | | | |
Republic of Panama, 5.20%, 1/30/20 | | 875,000 | | 1,017,187 |
Republic of Panama, 7.13%, 1/29/26 | | 100,000 | | 135,500 |
| | | | 1,152,687 |
| | | | |
Peru – 2.2% | | | | |
Republic of Peru, 7.13%, 3/30/19 | | 150,000 | | 192,750 |
Republic of Peru, 8.75%, 11/21/33 | | 320,000 | | 512,800 |
Republic of Peru, 6.55%, 3/14/37 | | 125,000 | | 164,187 |
| | | | 869,737 |
|
Philippines – 4.5% | | | | |
Republic of Philippines, 6.50%, 1/20/20 | | 350,000 | | 427,000 |
Republic of Philippines, 4.00%, 1/15/21 | | 1,300,000 | | 1,371,500 |
| | | | 1,798,500 |
|
Poland – 1.7% | | | | |
Republic of Poland, 5.13%, 4/21/21 | | 350,000 | | 378,350 |
Republic of Poland, 5.00%, 3/23/22 | | 290,000 | | 310,300 |
| | | | 688,650 |
16 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC EMERGING MARKETS DEBT FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Yankee Dollars, continued | | | | |
| | Principal | | |
| | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Romania – 0.3% | | | | |
Romania, Registered, 6.75%, 2/7/22, MTN | | 100,000 | | 105,000 |
|
Russian Federation – 10.1% | | | | |
Alfa Issuance Ltd., Series E, | | | | |
8.00%, 3/18/15, MTN | | 100,000 | | 105,350 |
RSHB Capital SA, 6.30%, 5/15/17 | | 475,000 | | 503,500 |
Russia Foreign Bond, 5.00%, 4/29/20 | | 800,000 | | 865,000 |
Russia Foreign Bond, Registered, | | | | |
7.50%, 3/31/30 (a) | | 1,670,375 | | 2,002,362 |
RZD Capital Ltd., Series E, | | | | |
5.74%, 4/3/17, MTN | | 500,000 | | 534,371 |
| | | | 4,010,583 |
|
South Africa – 3.0% | | | | |
Republic of South Africa, 6.88%, 5/27/19 | | 650,000 | | 795,437 |
Republic of South Africa, 5.50%, 3/9/20 | | 175,000 | | 199,063 |
Republic of South Africa, 4.67%, 1/17/24 | | 200,000 | | 209,500 |
| | | | 1,204,000 |
|
Sri Lanka – 0.5% | | | | |
Bank of Ceylon, Registered, 6.88%, 5/3/17 | | 200,000 | | 203,200 |
|
Turkey – 9.3% | | | | |
Republic of Turkey, 5.63%, 3/30/21 | | 2,350,000 | | 2,514,500 |
Republic of Turkey, 5.13%, 3/25/22 | | 850,000 | | 865,725 |
Republic of Turkey, 6.25%, 9/26/22 | | 300,000 | | 332,250 |
| | | | 3,712,475 |
|
Ukraine – 1.6% | | | | |
Ukraine Government, 6.88%, 9/23/15 | | 475,000 | | 450,062 |
Ukraine Government, 7.75%, 9/23/20 | | 200,000 | | 181,000 |
| | | | 631,062 |
|
Uruguay – 1.3% | | | | |
Republic of Uruguay, PIK, 7.88%, 1/15/33 | | 375,000 | | 529,688 |
|
Venezuela – 10.2% | | | | |
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, | | | | |
7.65%, 4/21/25 | | 125,000 | | 96,875 |
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, | | | | |
9.25%, 5/7/28 | | 750,000 | | 635,625 |
Petroleos de Venezuela SA, 8.50%, 11/2/17 | | 1,450,000 | | 1,294,125 |
| | | | |
| | Shares or | | |
| | Principal | | |
| | Amount ($) | | |
Republic of Venezuela, 7.00%, 12/1/18 | | 100,000 | | 86,000 |
Republic of Venezuela, 7.75%, 10/13/19 | | 2,100,000 | | 1,808,100 |
Republic of Venezuela, 9.25%, 9/15/27 | | 150,000 | | 132,750 |
| | | | 4,053,475 |
|
TOTAL YANKEE DOLLARS | | | | |
(COST $35,379,343) | | | | 37,777,611 |
|
U.S. Treasury Obligations – 1.6% | | | | |
|
U.S. Treasury Bonds – 0.6% | | | | |
3.75%, 8/15/41 | | 200,000 | | 225,812 |
| | | | |
U.S. Treasury Notes – 1.0% | | | | |
1.38%, 2/28/19 | | 300,000 | | 302,062 |
2.00%, 2/15/22 | | 125,000 | | 125,938 |
| | | | 428,000 |
|
TOTAL U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS | | | | |
(COST $640,968) | | | | 653,812 |
|
Investment Company – 2.9% | | | | |
|
Northern Institutional Diversified Assets | | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01%(b) | | 1,130,724 | | 1,130,724 |
| | | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENT COMPANY | | | | |
(COST $1,130,724) | | | | 1,130,724 |
| | | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | | | |
(COST $37,151,035) — 99.6% | | | | 39,562,147 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $39,708,138.
(a) | Step Bond: Coupon rate is set for an initial period and then increases to a higher coupon rate at a specified date. |
(b) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
MTN — Medium Term Note
PIK — Payment-in-Kind
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 17 |
HSBC EMERGING MARKETS DEBT FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Credit Default Swap Agreements - Sell Protection(a)
At April 30, 2012, the Fund’s open credit default swap agreements were as follows:
| | | | | | Implied Credit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Spread at | | Notional | | | | | | | Upfront | | Unrealized |
| | | | Expiration | | April 30, 2012 | | Amount | | Fixed | | | | | Premiums Paid/ | | Appreciation/ |
Underlying Instrument | | Counterparty | | Date | | (%) (b) | | ($) (c) | | Rate (%) | | Value ($) | | | (Received) ($) | | (Depreciation) ($) |
Federative | | Barclays | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Republic of Brazil | | Bank PLC | | 09/20/16 | | 1.14 | | 550,000 | | 1.00 | | (1,953 | ) | | | (11,666 | ) | | | | 9,713 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Peoples Republic | | JPMorgan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
of China | | Chase | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Bank N.A. | | 09/20/16 | | 0.99 | | 500,000 | | 1.00 | | 1,404 | | | | (3,227 | ) | | | | 4,631 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Peoples Republic | | JPMorgan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
of China | | Chase | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Bank N.A. | | 09/20/16 | | 0.99 | | 500,000 | | 1.00 | | 1,404 | | | | (4,641 | ) | | | | 6,045 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 855 | | | | (19,534 | ) | | | | 20,389 | |
(a) | When a credit event occurs as defined under the terms of the swap agreement, the Fund as a seller of credit protection will either (i) pay to the buyer of protection an amount equal to the par value of the defaulted reference entity and take delivery of the reference entity or (ii) pay a net amount equal to the par value of the defaulted reference entity less its recovery value. |
(b) | Implied credit spread, represented in absolute terms, utilized in determining the market value of the credit default swap agreements as of period end serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and represent the likelihood or risk of default for the credit derivative. The implied credit spread of a referenced entity reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may include upfront payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. Generally, wider credit spreads represent a perceived deterioration of the referenced entity’s credit soundness and a greater likelihood or risk of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the swap agreement. |
(c) | The notional amount represents the maximum potential amount the Fund could be required to make as a seller of credit protection if a credit event occurs, as defined under the terms of the swap agreement. |
At April 30, 2012, the Fund’s open forward foreign currency exchange contracts were as follows:
| | | | | | Contract | | | | | | Unrealized |
| | | | | | Amount | | Contract | | | | Appreciation/ |
| | | | Delivery | | (Local | | Value | | Value | | (Depreciation) |
Short Contracts | | | Counterparty | | Date | | Currency) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) |
Brazilian Real | | Standard Charter Bank | | 5/3/12 | | 580,230 | | 315,000 | | 304,329 | | | 10,671 | | |
Brazilian Real | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/3/12 | | 580,230 | | 306,708 | | 304,328 | | | 2,380 | | |
Brazilian Real | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/4/12 | | 580,230 | | 313,520 | | 302,349 | | | 11,171 | | |
| | | | | | | | 935,228 | | 911,006 | | | 24,222 | | |
| |
| | | | | | Contract | | | | | | Unrealized |
| | | | | | Amount | | Contract | | | | Appreciation/ |
| | | | Delivery | | (Local | | Value | | Value | | (Depreciation) |
Long Contracts | | | Counterparty | | Date | | Currency) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) |
Brazilian Real | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/3/12 | | 580,230 | | 315,514 | | 304,328 | | | (11,186 | ) | |
Brazilian Real | | Standard Charter Bank | | 5/3/12 | | 580,230 | | 306,708 | | 304,328 | | | (2,380 | ) | |
Brazilian Real | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/4/12 | | 570,600 | | 300,000 | | 297,331 | | | (2,669 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | 922,222 | | 905,987 | | | (16,235 | ) | |
18 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC EMERGING MARKETS LOCAL DEBT FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Foreign Bonds – 54.7%† | | | | |
| | Principal | | |
| | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Hungary – 1.6% | | | | |
Hungary Government Bond, Series 22/A, | | | | |
7.00%, 6/24/22 | | 100,000,000 | | 429,102 |
| | | | |
Indonesia – 5.8% | | | | |
Indonesia Government, Series FR28, | | | | |
10.00%, 7/15/17 | | 9,100,000,000 | | 1,198,395 |
Indonesia Government, Series FR56, | | | | |
8.38%, 9/15/26 | | 2,855,000,000 | | 363,780 |
| | | | 1,562,175 |
| | | | |
Malaysia – 6.1% | | | | |
Malaysian Government, Series 0409, | | | | |
3.74%, 2/27/15 | | 4,500,000 | | 1,509,855 |
Malaysian Government, Series 0111, | | | | |
4.16%, 7/15/21 | | 380,000 | | 131,728 |
| | | | 1,641,583 |
|
Mexico – 5.3% | | | | |
Mexican Bonos Desarr, Series M, | | | | |
8.00%, 6/11/20 (a) | | 13,950,000 | | 1,212,082 |
Mexican Bonos Desarr, Series M, | | | | |
6.50%, 6/10/21 (a) | | 1,600,000 | | 125,898 |
Mexican Bonos Desarr, Series M30, | | | | |
8.50%, 11/18/38 (a) | | 800,000 | | 69,152 |
| | | | 1,407,132 |
|
Peru – 0.9% | | | | |
Peru Bono Soberano, 9.91%, 5/5/15 | | 515,000 | | 226,822 |
|
Poland – 7.6% | | | | |
Poland Government Bond, Series 0414, | | | | |
5.75%, 4/25/14 | | 4,600,000 | | 1,488,575 |
Poland Government Bond, Series 1020, | | | | |
5.25%, 10/25/20 | | 150,000 | | 47,346 |
Poland Government Bond, Series 1021, | | | | |
5.75%, 10/25/21 | | 840,000 | | 273,079 |
Poland Government Bond, Series 0922, | | | | |
5.75%, 9/23/22 | | 660,000 | | 214,227 |
| | | | 2,023,227 |
|
Russian Federation – 3.3% | | | | |
Russia Foreign Bond, 7.85%, 3/10/18 | | 25,000,000 | | 888,113 |
|
South Africa – 13.0% | | | | |
Republic of South Africa, Series R157, | | | | |
13.50%, 9/15/15 | | 10,000,000 | | 1,557,777 |
Republic of South Africa, Series R203, | | | | |
8.25%, 9/15/17 | | 8,000,000 | | 1,087,700 |
Republic of South Africa, Series R186, | | | | |
10.50%, 12/21/26 | | 2,050,000 | | 315,620 |
Republic of South Africa, Series R213, | | | | |
7.00%, 2/28/31 | | 2,400,000 | | 264,084 |
Republic of South Africa, Series R209, | | | | |
6.25%, 3/31/36 | | 2,500,000 | | 240,637 |
| | | | 3,465,818 |
|
Thailand – 4.3% | | | | |
Thailand Government Bond, | | | | |
4.13%, 11/18/16 | | 35,000,000 | | 1,158,376 |
| | | | |
| | Shares or | | |
| | Principal | | |
| | Amount ($) | | |
Turkey – 6.8% | | | | |
Turkey Government Bond, | | | | |
10.00%, 4/10/13 (a) | | 2,480,000 | | 1,420,039 |
Turkey Government Bond, | | | | |
10.00%, 6/17/15 (a) | | 708,000 | | 412,153 |
| | | | 1,832,192 |
|
TOTAL FOREIGN BONDS | | | | |
(COST $15,075,003) | | | | 14,634,540 |
|
Yankee Dollars – 5.6% | | | | |
|
Brazil �� 0.9% | | | | |
Banco Votorantim, 4.25%, 2/8/13, MTN (b) | | 250,000 | | 253,312 |
|
Kazakhstan – 0.9% | | | | |
KazMunayGas National Co., Series 1, | | | | |
8.38%, 7/2/13, MTN | | 225,000 | | 238,217 |
|
Luxembourg – 1.0% | | | | |
TNK-BP Finance SA, Series 5, | | | | |
7.50%, 3/13/13, MTN | | 250,000 | | 261,875 |
|
Russian Federation – 2.0% | | | | |
AK Transneft OJSC, 7.70%, 8/7/13 | | 225,000 | | 240,288 |
Alfa Invest Ltd., 9.25%, 6/24/13, MTN | | 100,000 | | 105,250 |
Sberbank, Series E, 6.48%, 5/15/13, MTN | | 200,000 | | 209,636 |
| | | | 555,174 |
|
United Arab Emirates – 0.8% | | | | |
The Abu Dhabi National Energy Co. | | | | |
(TAQA), 6.60%, 8/1/13 | | 200,000 | | 210,000 |
|
TOTAL YANKEE DOLLARS | | | | |
(COST $1,512,929) | | | | 1,518,578 |
|
Purchased Options – 0.1% | | | | |
| | Contracts | | |
Brazilian Real Currency Option (USD/BRL), | | | | |
Strike @ $1.86 Exp. 5/29/12 | | 500,000 | | 15,580 |
Turkish Lira Currency Option (USD/TRY), | | | | |
Strike @ $1.88 Exp. 5/24/12 | | 500,000 | | 84 |
|
TOTAL PURCHASED SWAPTIONS | | | | |
(COST $12,600) | | | | 15,664 |
|
Investment Company – 35.7% | | | | |
|
Northern Institutional Diversified Assets | | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01% (c) | | 9,556,596 | | 9,556,596 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT COMPANY | | | | |
(COST $9,556,596) | | | | 9,556,596 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | | | |
(COST $26,157,128) — 96.1% | | | | 25,725,378 |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 19 |
HSBC EMERGING MARKETS LOCAL DEBT FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $26,759,698.
† | The principal amount is disclosed in local currency and the value is disclosed in U.S. Dollars. |
(a) | Variable rate security. The interest rates on these securities are adjusted periodically to reflect then-current short-term interest rates. The rates presented represent the rates in effect on April 30, 2012. The maturity dates presented reflect the final maturity dates. However, some of these securities may contain put or demand features that allow the Fund to require the issuer to repurchase the security from the fund within various time periods, including daily, weekly, monthly, or semi-annually. |
(b) | Step Bond: Coupon rate is set for an initial period and then increases to a higher coupon rate at a specified date. |
(c) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
MTN — Medium Term Note
Written Options
At April 30, 2012, the Fund’s open options contracts were as follows:
| | | | | | | | Strike | | Premium | | | |
| | | | | | | | Price | | Received | | Value |
Contracts | | | Counterparty | | Description | | Expiration Date | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) |
250,000 | | Barclays Bank PLC | | Turkish Lira Currency Option (USD/TRY) | | 5/23/2012 | | 1.80 | | 6,100 | | (707 | ) |
250,000 | | Barclays Bank PLC | | Brazilian Real Currency Option (USD/BRL) | | 5/25/2012 | | 1.75 | | 6,500 | | (22,297 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | (23,004 | ) |
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
At April 30, 2012, the Fund’s open interest rate swap agreements were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Upfront | | Unrealized |
Pay/Receive | | | | | Fixed | | | | | | Notional | | Notional | | | | Premiums | | Appreciation/ |
Floating | | | | | Rate | | Expiration | | | | Amount | | Amount | | Value | | Paid/(Received) | | (Depreciation) |
Rate | | | Floating Rate Index | | (%) | | Date | | Counterparty | | (Local) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) |
| | | | | | | | JPMorgan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Chase | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pay | | 1-Year BRL CDI | | 10.44 | | 1/2/14 | | Bank N.A. | | 2,200,000 | BRL | | 1,154,613 | | 27,571 | | | — | | | | | 27,571 | |
| |
| | 1-Month | | | | | | Barclays | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pay | | MXN-TIIE-Banxico | | 6.69 | | 12/23/21 | | Bank PLC | | 6,250,000 | MXN | | 479,920 | | 11,729 | | | (131 | ) | | | | 11,860 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 39,300 | | | (131 | ) | | | | 39,431 | |
20 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC EMERGING MARKETS LOCAL DEBT FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
At April 30, 2012, the Fund’s open forward foreign currency exchange contracts were as follows:
| | | | | | Contract | | | | | | Unrealized |
| | | | | | Amount | | Contract | | | | Appreciation/ |
| | | | Delivery | | (Local | | Value | | Value | | (Depreciation) |
Short Contracts | | | Counterparty | | Date | | Currency) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) |
Brazilian Real | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/3/12 | | 920,750 | | 500,000 | | 482,929 | | | 17,071 | | |
Brazilian Real | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/3/12 | | 366,900 | | 200,000 | | 192,437 | | | 7,563 | | |
Brazilian Real | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/3/12 | | 2,482,197 | | 1,349,753 | | 1,301,901 | | | 47,852 | | |
Colombian Peso | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 5/22/12 | | 1,576,418,345 | | 886,126 | | 891,881 | | | (5,755 | ) | |
Czech Koruna | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/4/12 | | 16,222,779 | | 855,000 | | 861,613 | | | (6,613 | ) | |
European Euro | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/26/12 | | 350,000 | | 460,828 | | 463,342 | | | (2,514 | ) | |
Hong Kong Dollar | | Standard Charter Bank | | 6/28/12 | | 776,600 | | 100,000 | | 100,123 | | | (123 | ) | |
Indonesian Rupiah | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/29/12 | | 4,098,550,000 | | 447,440 | | 444,697 | | | 2,743 | | |
Korean Won | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 7/9/12 | | 230,200,000 | | 200,000 | | 203,351 | | | (3,351 | ) | |
Malaysian Ringgit | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/14/12 | | 1,870,449 | | 615,887 | | 616,354 | | | (467 | ) | |
Mexican Peso | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/1/12 | | 3,468,398 | | 270,000 | | 265,485 | | | 4,515 | | |
Mexican Peso | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/14/12 | | 6,576,000 | | 500,000 | | 502,784 | | | (2,784 | ) | |
Peruvian Nuevo Sol | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 7/30/12 | | 411,317 | | 154,225 | | 155,840 | | | (1,615 | ) | |
Philippine Peso | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/18/12 | | 47,617,880 | | 1,114,129 | | 1,126,630 | | | (12,501 | ) | |
Polish Zloty | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/4/12 | | 1,050,912 | | 328,000 | | 332,157 | | | (4,157 | ) | |
Polish Zloty | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/4/12 | | 1,601,550 | | 500,000 | | 506,194 | | | (6,194 | ) | |
Polish Zloty | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 6/4/12 | | 700,000 | | 221,481 | | 221,246 | | | 235 | | |
Russian Ruble | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/24/12 | | 39,497,240 | | 1,338,889 | | 1,340,003 | | | (1,114 | ) | |
South African Rand | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/7/12 | | 247,488 | | 32,000 | | 31,702 | | | 298 | | |
South African Rand | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/7/12 | | 2,564,736 | | 320,000 | | 328,531 | | | (8,531 | ) | |
South African Rand | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/7/12 | | 6,512,780 | | 830,161 | | 834,258 | | | (4,097 | ) | |
South African Rand | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 6/7/12 | | 3,603,206 | | 465,567 | | 461,555 | | | 4,012 | | |
South African Rand | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 6/7/12 | | 287,463 | | 37,756 | | 36,823 | | | 933 | | |
South African Rand | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 6/7/12 | | 1,872,881 | | 246,458 | | 239,908 | | | 6,550 | | |
South African Rand | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 6/7/12 | | 373,381 | | 49,134 | | 47,828 | | | 1,306 | | |
Thai Baht | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 5/21/12 | | 9,579,000 | | 310,000 | | 311,153 | | | (1,153 | ) | |
Turkish Lira | | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/11/12 | | 902,150 | | 500,000 | | 512,553 | | | (12,553 | ) | |
Turkish Lira | | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 5/11/12 | | 1,083,050 | | 614,845 | | 615,330 | | | (485 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | 13,447,679 | | 13,428,608 | | | 19,071 | | |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 21 |
HSBC EMERGING MARKETS LOCAL DEBT FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | Contract | | | | | | Unrealized |
| | | | | Amount | | Contract | | | | Appreciation/ |
| | | Delivery | | (Local | | Value | | Value | | (Depreciation) |
Long Contracts | | Counterparty | | Date | | Currency) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) |
Brazilian Real | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/3/12 | | 733,200 | | 400,000 | | 384,560 | | (15,440 | ) |
Brazilian Real | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 5/3/12 | | 3,036,647 | | 1,690,501 | | 1,592,709 | | (97,792 | ) |
Brazilian Real | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/4/12 | | 2,482,197 | | 1,341,220 | | 1,293,433 | | (47,787 | ) |
Brazilian Real | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/4/12 | | 570,600 | | 300,000 | | 297,331 | | (2,669 | ) |
Chilean Peso | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/21/12 | | 143,775,000 | | 292,463 | | 294,587 | | 2,124 | |
Chinese Yuan | Barclays Bank PLC | | 7/27/12 | | 1,622,500 | | 256,928 | | 256,603 | | (325 | ) |
Chinese Yuan | Barclays Bank PLC | | 7/27/12 | | 3,160,500 | | 500,000 | | 499,843 | | (157 | ) |
Colombian Peso | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/22/12 | | 1,116,908,345 | | 619,816 | | 631,907 | | 12,091 | |
Colombian Peso | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/22/12 | | 459,510,000 | | 255,000 | | 259,974 | | 4,974 | |
Colombian Peso | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 7/26/12 | | 1,576,418,345 | | 879,158 | | 886,240 | | 7,082 | |
Czech Koruna | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/4/12 | | 19,096,101 | | 1,036,423 | | 1,014,218 | | (22,205 | ) |
Hong Kong Dollar | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/28/12 | | 10,712,541 | | 1,377,712 | | 1,381,109 | | 3,397 | |
Hong Kong Dollar | Standard Charter Bank | | 6/28/12 | | 388,100 | | 50,000 | | 50,036 | | 36 | |
Hungarian Forint | Barclays Bank PLC | | 7/13/12 | | 113,706,768 | | 494,076 | | 519,848 | | 25,772 | |
Indian Rupee | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/25/12 | | 14,387,540 | | 284,339 | | 269,704 | | (14,635 | ) |
Indian Rupee | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/25/12 | | 5,251,000 | | 100,000 | | 98,433 | | (1,567 | ) |
Israeli New Shekel | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/21/12 | | 1,397,144 | | 371,255 | | 370,526 | | (729 | ) |
Korean Won | Standard Charter Bank | | 7/9/12 | | 201,525,000 | | 178,815 | | 178,020 | | (795 | ) |
Malaysian Ringgit | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/14/12 | | 1,548,250 | | 500,000 | | 510,183 | | 10,183 | |
Mexican Peso | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 6/1/12 | | 25,450,151 | | 1,985,036 | | 1,948,057 | | (36,979 | ) |
Mexican Peso | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/14/12 | | 6,640,000 | | 500,000 | | 507,677 | | 7,677 | |
Peruvian Nuevo Sol | Barclays Bank PLC | | 7/30/12 | | 1,323,250 | | 500,000 | | 501,353 | | 1,353 | |
Philippine Peso | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/18/12 | | 30,016,000 | | 700,000 | | 710,173 | | 10,173 | |
Philippine Peso | Standard Charter Bank | | 5/18/12 | | 17,601,880 | | 401,732 | | 416,457 | | 14,725 | |
Philippine Peso | Barclays Bank PLC | | 7/19/12 | | 47,617,880 | | 1,111,529 | | 1,121,592 | | 10,063 | |
Polish Zloty | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 5/2/12 | | 700,000 | | 222,293 | | 222,103 | | (190 | ) |
Polish Zloty | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/4/12 | | 2,708,000 | | 874,169 | | 855,905 | | (18,264 | ) |
Romanian Leu | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 6/21/12 | | 1,296,417 | | 389,724 | | 385,566 | | (4,158 | ) |
Russian Ruble | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/24/12 | | 7,778,390 | | 259,042 | | 263,893 | | 4,851 | |
Russian Ruble | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/24/12 | | 22,760,100 | | 760,000 | | 772,170 | | 12,170 | |
Russian Ruble | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/24/12 | | 8,958,750 | | 300,000 | | 303,939 | | 3,939 | |
Russian Ruble | Barclays Bank PLC | | 7/25/12 | | 39,497,240 | | 1,327,371 | | 1,328,363 | | 992 | |
Singapore Dollar | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 6/21/12 | | 1,635,526 | | 1,272,971 | | 1,322,071 | | 49,100 | |
South African Rand | Barclays Bank PLC | | 6/7/12 | | 1,000,000 | | 128,182 | | 128,095 | | (87 | ) |
Taiwan Dollar | Standard Charter Bank | | 6/12/12 | | 7,157,500 | | 243,411 | | 245,306 | | 1,895 | |
Taiwan Dollar | Standard Charter Bank | | 6/12/12 | | 2,951,500 | | 100,000 | | 101,156 | | 1,156 | |
Thai Baht | Standard Charter Bank | | 5/21/12 | | 4,863,870 | | 152,105 | | 157,992 | | 5,887 | |
Turkish Lira | Barclays Bank PLC | | 5/11/12 | | 232,856 | | 130,000 | | 132,296 | | 2,296 | |
Turkish Lira | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 5/11/12 | | 1,561,809 | | 810,025 | | 887,335 | | 77,310 | |
Turkish Lira | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 5/11/12 | | 190,535 | | 99,263 | | 108,252 | | 8,989 | |
Turkish Lira | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 7/2/12 | | 1,083,050 | | 608,045 | | 608,616 | | 571 | |
| | | | | | | 25,802,604 | | 23,817,631 | | 15,027 | |
22 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FRONTIER MARKETS FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Common Stocks – 83.9% | | | |
| Shares ($) | | Value ($) |
Argentina – 2.2% | | | |
Banco Macro SA ADR | 3,834 | | 59,120 |
Grupo Financiero Galicia SA ADR | 21,286 | | 118,989 |
Telecom Argentina SA ADR* | 11,770 | | 172,195 |
| | | 350,304 |
|
Australia – 0.5% | | | |
Centamin plc* | 66,197 | | 73,688 |
| | | |
Bangladesh – 1.9% | | | |
Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. | 291,250 | | 162,972 |
Prime Bank Ltd. | 322,800 | | 142,371 |
| | | 305,343 |
|
Cambodia – 1.2% | | | |
NagaCorp Ltd. | 410,000 | | 190,776 |
| | | |
Canada – 0.5% | | | |
SouthGobi Resources Ltd.* | 11,500 | | 79,451 |
| | | |
Colombia – 3.2% | | | |
Ecopetrol SA | 159,500 | | 515,947 |
| | | |
Croatia – 0.8% | | | |
Hrvatski Telekom dd | 3,500 | | 128,021 |
| | | |
Egypt – 3.1% | | | |
Commercial International Bank | 26,114 | | 110,584 |
Orascom Construction Industries (OCI) | 5,548 | | 244,174 |
Orascom Telecom Holding SAE | 124,200 | | 69,468 |
Six of October Development & Investment Co. | 26,500 | | 70,515 |
| | | 494,741 |
|
Estonia – 1.3% | | | |
Tallink Group Ltd.* | 238,500 | | 206,755 |
| | | |
Kazakhstan – 6.1% | | | |
Kazakhmys plc | 17,500 | | 244,499 |
KazMunaiGas Exploration Production | | | |
GDR(a) | 36,000 | | 720,000 |
| | | 964,499 |
|
Kenya – 3.8% | | | |
Cove Energy plc* | 41,100 | | 151,059 |
Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd. | 992,000 | | 268,915 |
Safaricom Ltd. | 4,520,000 | | 179,711 |
| | | 599,685 |
|
Kuwait – 5.8% | | | |
Kuwait Projects Co. (Holding) KSC | 157,500 | | 184,460 |
Mabanee Co. SAKC | 60,500 | | 218,018 |
Mobile Telecommunications Co. | 82,500 | | 220,000 |
National Bank of Kuwait | 77,000 | | 294,126 |
| | | 916,604 |
|
Lebanon – 1.3% | | | |
Banque Audi SAL - Audi Saradar Group | 12,000 | | 72,720 |
Solidere, Class A | 9,919 | | 135,890 |
| | | 208,610 |
|
Nigeria – 10.5% | | | |
Dangote Cement plc | 204,000 | | 158,220 |
First Bank of Nigeria plc | 2,950,500 | | 187,196 |
Guaranty Trust Bank plc | 3,450,000 | | 351,361 |
Guinness Nigeria plc | 144,200 | | 217,290 |
Nestle Foods Nigeria plc | 52,800 | | 140,643 |
Nigerian Breweries plc | 361,277 | | 252,871 |
Oando plc | 365,000 | | 37,591 |
Skye Bank plc* | 1,540,000 | | 38,769 |
Zenith Bank plc | 3,200,000 | | 288,061 |
| | | 1,672,002 |
|
Oman – 3.2% | | | |
Bank Muscat SAOG | 214,935 | | 348,453 |
Renaissance Services SAOG* | 95,200 | | 155,822 |
| | | 504,275 |
|
Pakistan – 6.4% | | | |
MCB Bank Ltd. | 128,150 | | 242,319 |
Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. | 115,060 | | 240,385 |
The Hub Power Co. Ltd. | 621,692 | | 252,242 |
United Bank Ltd. | 309,100 | | 289,709 |
| | | 1,024,655 |
|
Panama – 1.4% | | | |
Copa Holdings SA, Class A | 2,816 | | 228,969 |
|
Peru – 4.1% | | | |
Cia de Minas Buenaventura SA ADR | 5,200 | | 214,604 |
Credicorp Ltd. | 3,300 | | 432,003 |
| | | 646,607 |
|
Philippines – 5.1% | | | |
Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. | 60,860 | | 131,784 |
Security Bank Corp. | 80,100 | | 271,365 |
SM Investments Corp. | 24,900 | | 412,345 |
| | | 815,494 |
|
Qatar – 11.2% | | | |
Doha Bank QSC | 9,651 | | 154,289 |
Gulf International Services QSC | 14,100 | | 100,507 |
Industries Qatar QSC | 5,668 | | 227,311 |
Qatar Electricity & Water Co. | 3,074 | | 120,072 |
Qatar Insurance Co. | 5,650 | | 116,399 |
Qatar Islamic Bank | 8,000 | | 170,086 |
Qatar National Bank | 10,708 | | 392,377 |
Qatar Telecom (QTEL) QSC | 9,902 | | 381,066 |
The Commercial Bank of Qatar QSC | 6,288 | | 124,361 |
| | | 1,786,468 |
|
Slovenia – 2.1% | | | |
KRKA dd | 5,270 | | 331,306 |
|
Sri Lanka – 1.7% | | | |
John Keells Holdings plc | 170,000 | | 266,412 |
|
United Arab Emirates – 5.0% | | | |
DP World Ltd. | 12,324 | | 141,233 |
Drake & Scull International* | 385,000 | | 100,632 |
Emaar Properties PJSC* | 470,000 | | 418,454 |
Emirates NBD PJSC | 38,664 | | 29,792 |
NMC Health plc* | 32,882 | | 111,784 |
| | | 801,895 |
See notes to financial statements. | | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 23 |
HSBC FRONTIER MARKETS FUND |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks, continued | | | |
| Shares ($) | | Value ($) |
United Kingdom – 1.5% | | | |
Bank of Georgia Holdings plc* | 13,550 | | 237,465 |
|
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | | | |
(COST $12,519,558) | | | 13,349,972 |
|
Preferred Stock – 4.3% | | | |
| | | |
Colombia – 4.3% | | | |
Bancolombia SA, Preferred Shares | 40,546 | | 688,000 |
|
TOTAL PREFERRED STOCK | | | |
(COST $644,430) | | | 688,000 |
|
Participatory Notes – 7.1% | | | |
| | | |
Saudi Arabia – 1.6% | | | |
Etihad Etisalat Co., 12/3/12, | | | |
(Deutsche Bank AG)*(a) | 14,100 | | 259,440 |
|
United Arab Emirates – 4.7% | | | |
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, 4/22/13, | | | |
(Citigroup Global Markets Holding, Inc.)* | 110,000 | | 98,890 |
Dana Gas, 3/1/17, (Deutsche Bank AG)* | 361,907 | | 43,429 |
First Gulf Bank PJSC, 2/11/19, | | | |
(Deutsche Bank AG)* | 126,900 | | 309,636 |
National Bank of Abu Dhabi, 11/29/13, | | | |
(Citigroup Global Markets Holding, Inc.)* | 91,300 | | 215,924 |
Union National Bank of Abu Dhabi, 9/27/13, | | | |
(Citigroup Global Markets Holding, Inc.)* | 92,500 | | 74,370 |
| | | 742,249 |
|
Vietnam – 0.8% | | | |
PetroVietnam Drilling and Well Services JSC, | | | |
9/6/16, (JPMorgan Chase)* | 67,099 | | 130,172 |
|
TOTAL PARTICIPATORY NOTES | | | |
(COST $1,126,093) | | | 1,131,861 |
|
Exchange Traded Fund – 0.9% | | | |
| | | |
SIF 5 Oltenia Craiova | 320,000 | | 134,353 |
|
TOTAL EXCHANGE TRADED FUND | | | |
(COST $108,129) | | | 134,353 |
|
Investment Company – 3.1% | | | |
| | | |
Northern Institutional Diversified Assets | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01%(b) | 482,974 | | 482,974 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT COMPANY | | | |
(COST $482,974) | | | 482,974 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | | |
(COST $14,881,184) — 99.3% | | | 15,787,160 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $15,905,189.
* | Represents non-income producing security. |
(a) | Rule 144A security or other security which is restricted as to resale to institutional investors. This security has been deemed liquid by the Investment Adviser based on procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(b) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
GDR — Global Depositary Receipt
The Fund invested, as a percentage of net assets, in the following industries, as of April 30, 2012:
Industry | Percent of Net Assets |
Commercial Banks | 36.4 | % |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 13.5 | % |
Diversified Telecommunication Services | 4.9 | % |
Industrial Conglomerates | 4.7 | % |
Diversified Financial Services | 4.5 | % |
Wireless Telecommunication Services | 3.7 | % |
Real Estate Management & Development | 3.5 | % |
Metals & Mining | 3.4 | % |
Energy Equipment & Services | 3.2 | % |
Investment Companies | 3.1 | % |
Beverages | 3.0 | % |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | 2.2 | % |
Pharmaceuticals | 2.1 | % |
Construction & Engineering | 1.9 | % |
Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders | 1.6 | % |
Marine | 1.5 | % |
Airlines | 1.5 | % |
Construction Materials | 1.0 | % |
Food Products | 0.9 | % |
Exchange Traded Funds | 0.9 | % |
Multi-Utilities | 0.8 | % |
Insurance | 0.7 | % |
Health Care Providers & Services | 0.7 | % |
Transportation Infrastructure | 0.3 | % |
Total Investments | 100.0 | % |
24 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | | See notes to financial statements. |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Corporate Bond – 2.5% | | | |
| Shares or | | |
| Principal | | |
| Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
United States – 2.5% | | | |
Reliance Holdings USA, Inc., Registered, | | | |
5.40%, 2/14/22 | 250,000 | | 250,637 |
|
TOTAL CORPORATE BOND | | | |
(COST $247,735) | | | 250,637 |
|
Foreign Bonds – 6.9%† | | | |
| | | |
Mexico – 6.9% | | | |
Mexican Cetes, Series BI, 0.00%, 7/12/12 (a) | 65,000,000 | | 494,775 |
Mexican Bonos Desarr, Series M, | | | |
6.50%, 6/10/21 (b) | 2,500,000 | | 196,716 |
|
TOTAL FOREIGN BONDS | | | |
(COST $704,398) | | | 691,491 |
|
Yankee Dollars – 37.5% | | | |
| | | |
Brazil – 7.1% | | | |
Banco do Brasil SA, Registered, | | | |
5.88%, 1/26/22 | 200,000 | | 208,000 |
Banco Santander Brasil SA, Registered, | | | |
4.63%, 2/13/17 | 300,000 | | 296,625 |
Banco Votorantim, Registered, | | | |
5.25%, 2/11/16, MTN | 200,000 | | 206,000 |
| | | 710,625 |
|
Cayman Islands – 2.2% | | | |
Voto-Votorantim Ltd., Registered, | | | |
6.75%, 4/5/21 | 200,000 | | 224,000 |
|
Colombia – 4.9% | | | |
Republic of Colombia, 7.38%, 1/27/17 | 400,000 | | 495,200 |
|
Indonesia – 4.0% | | | |
Pertamina PT, Registered, 4.88%, 5/3/22 | 200,000 | | 199,200 |
Republic of Indonesia, Registered, | | | |
3.75%, 4/25/22 | 200,000 | | 197,000 |
| | | 396,200 |
|
Luxembourg – 4.2% | | | |
Gazprom OAO, Registered, | | | |
6.51%, 3/7/22, MTN | 200,000 | | 219,540 |
VTB Bank OJSC (VTB Capital SA), | | | |
Registered, 6.00%, 4/12/17 | 200,000 | | 203,600 |
| | | 423,140 |
|
Mexico – 4.7% | | | |
United Mexican States, 5.63%, 1/15/17 | 400,000 | | 467,000 |
|
Peru – 2.1% | | | |
Corp. Financiera de Desarrollo SA, | | | |
Registered, 4.75%, 2/8/22 | 200,000 | | 208,500 |
|
Russian Federation – 6.3% | | | |
Russia Foreign Bond, Registered, | | | |
7.50%, 3/31/30 (c) | 523,250 | | 627,246 |
|
Turkey – 2.0% | | | |
Republic of Turkey, 5.13%, 3/25/22 | 200,000 | | 203,700 |
|
TOTAL YANKEE DOLLARS | | | |
(COST $3,747,782) | | | 3,755,611 |
| | | |
U.S. Treasury Obligation – 4.0% | | | |
| | | |
U.S. Treasury Bills – 4.0% | | | |
0.07%, 5/10/12 (d) | 400,000 | | 399,995 |
| | | |
TOTAL U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATION | | | |
(COST $399,993) | | | 399,995 |
| | | |
Purchased Options – 0.0% | | | |
| Contracts | | |
Turkish Lira Currency Option (USD/TRY), | | | |
Strike @ $1.89 Exp. 7/2/12 | 700,000 | | 1,511 |
| | | |
TOTAL PUT OPTION PURCHASED | | | |
(COST $8,085) | | | 1,511 |
| | | |
Investment Company – 50.6% | | | |
| | | |
Northern Institutional Diversified Assets | | | |
Portfolio, Institutional Shares, 0.01% (e) | 5,063,659 | | 5,063,659 |
| | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENT COMPANY | | | |
(COST $5,063,659) | | | 5,063,659 |
| | | |
TOTAL INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | | |
(COST $10,171,652) — 101.5% | | | 10,162,904 |
____________________
Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $10,015,578.
† | The principal amount is disclosed in local currency and the value is disclosed in U.S. Dollars. |
(a) | Zero-Coupon Security. |
(b) | Variable rate security. The interest rates on these securities are adjusted periodically to reflect then-current short-term interest rates. The rates presented represent the rates in effect on April 30, 2012. The maturity dates presented reflect the final maturity dates. However, some of these securities may contain put or demand features that allow the Fund to require the issuer to repurchase the security from the fund within various time periods, including daily, weekly, monthly, or semi-annually. |
(c) | Step Bond: Coupon rate is set for an initial period and then increases to a higher coupon rate at a specified date. |
(d) | Discount note. Rate presented represents the effective yield at time of purchase. |
(e) | The rate represents the annualized one-day yield that was in effect on April 30, 2012. |
MTN — Medium Term Note
See notes to financial statements. | | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 25 |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
At April 30, 2012, the Fund’s open forward foreign currency exchange contracts were as follows:
| | | | | Contract | | | | | | Unrealized |
| | | | | Amount | | Contract | | | | Appreciation/ |
| | | Delivery | | (Local | | Value | | Value | | (Depreciation) |
Short Contracts | | Counterparty | | Date | | Currency) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) |
Brazilian Real | Standard Charter Bank | | 5/3/12 | | 921,000 | | 500,000 | | 483,061 | | | 16,939 | |
Brazilian Real | Standard Charter Bank | | 6/4/12 | | 921,000 | | 498,457 | | 479,917 | | | 18,540 | |
Mexican Peso | Standard Charter Bank | | 6/1/12 | | 2,590,000 | | 201,309 | | 198,249 | | | 3,060 | |
Mexican Peso | Standard Charter Bank | | 7/12/12 | | 6,500,000 | | 505,317 | | 495,755 | | | 9,562 | |
Turkish Lira | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 5/11/12 | | 630,665 | | 350,000 | | 358,310 | | | (8,310 | ) |
Turkish Lira | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 7/2/12 | | 630,665 | | 354,067 | | 354,400 | | | (333 | ) |
| | | | | | | 2,409,150 | | 2,369,692 | | | 39,458 | |
|
| | | | | Contract | | | | | | Unrealized |
| | | | | Amount | | Contract | | | | Appreciation/ |
| | | Delivery | | (Local | | Value | | Value | | (Depreciation) |
Long Contracts | | Counterparty | | Date | | Currency) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) |
Brazilian Real | Standard Charter Bank | | 5/3/12 | | 921,000 | | 501,634 | | 483,062 | | | (18,572 | ) |
Brazilian Real | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 6/4/12 | | 949,500 | | 500,000 | | 494,769 | | | (5,231 | ) |
Turkish Lira | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | | 5/11/12 | | 630,665 | | 358,027 | | 358,309 | | | 282 | |
| | | | | | | 1,359,661 | | 1,336,140 | | | (23,521 | ) |
26 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities – as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | Emerging | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Emerging | | | | Markets | | | | Frontier | | | | Total | |
| | Markets | | | | Local Debt | | | | Markets | | | | Return | |
| | Debt Fund | | | | Fund | | | | Fund | | | | Fund | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment securities, at value | | $ | 39,562,147 | | | | | $ | 25,725,378 | | | | | $ | 15,787,160 | | | | | $ | 10,162,904 | | |
Foreign currency, at value | | | 264 | | | | | | 271,337 | | | | | | 46,463 | | | | | | 183 | | |
Unrealized appreciation on swap agreements | | | 20,389 | | | | | | 39,431 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Unrealized appreciation on forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 24,222 | | | | | | 371,885 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 48,383 | | |
Interest and dividends receivable | | | 484,737 | | | | | | 247,966 | | | | | | 61,776 | | | | | | 40,331 | | |
Receivable for capital shares issued | | | 172,921 | | | | | | 27,335 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 1,064 | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | — | | | | | | 584,309 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Reclaims receivable | | | — | | | | | | 38,930 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Receivable from Investment Adviser | | | — | | | | | | 33,940 | | | | | | 7,202 | | | | | | 1,382 | | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 34,907 | | | | | | 34,492 | | | | | | 13,309 | | | | | | 1,525 | | |
Total Assets | | | 40,299,587 | | | | | | 27,375,003 | | | | | | 15,915,910 | | | | | | 10,255,772 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and dividends payable | | | 140,009 | | | | | | 27,402 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 1,064 | | |
Unrealized depreciation on forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 16,235 | | | | | | 337,787 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 32,446 | | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | 398,828 | | | | | | 214,541 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 198,828 | | |
Premiums received on swap agreements | | | 19,534 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Payable for capital shares redeemed | | | 508 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 48 | | | | | | — | | |
Written options (Premiums received $12,600.00) | | | — | | | | | | 23,004 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | 6,738 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Administration | | | 1,602 | | | | | | 1,084 | | | | | | 640 | | | | | | 164 | | |
�� Shareholder Servicing | | | 128 | | | | | | 418 | | | | | | 75 | | | | | | 20 | | |
Compliance Service | | | 58 | | | | | | 80 | | | | | | 23 | | | | | | 6 | | |
Accounting | | | 266 | | | | | | 308 | | | | | | 287 | | | | | | 16 | | |
Custodian | | | 781 | | | | | | 673 | | | | | | 244 | | | | | | 6,347 | | |
Transfer Agent | | | 3,428 | | | | | | 3,502 | | | | | | 92 | | | | | | — | | |
Trustee | | | 37 | | | | | | 37 | | | | | | 65 | | | | | | 143 | | |
Other | | | 3,297 | | | | | | 6,469 | | | | | | 9,247 | | | | | | 1,160 | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 591,449 | | | | | | 615,305 | | | | | | 10,721 | | | | | | 240,194 | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 39,708,138 | | | | | $ | 26,759,698 | | | | | $ | 15,905,189 | | | | | $ | 10,015,578 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Composition of Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital | | | 37,307,302 | | | | | | 27,300,490 | | | | | | 15,087,612 | | | | | | 10,001,064 | | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | | 14,278 | | | | | | (64,182 | ) | | | | | 277,622 | | | | | | 1,413 | | |
Accumulated net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | (52,923 | ) | | | | | (108,933 | ) | | | | | (366,077 | ) | | | | | 5,977 | | |
Unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | 2,439,481 | | | | | | (367,677 | ) | | | | | 906,032 | | | | | | 7,124 | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 39,708,138 | | | | | $ | 26,759,698 | | | | | $ | 15,905,189 | | | | | $ | 10,015,578 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | $ | 440,794 | | | | | $ | 1,786,949 | | | | | $ | 176,702 | | | | | $ | 100,125 | | |
�� Class I Shares | | | 39,154,043 | | | | | | 24,873,008 | | | | | | 15,728,487 | | | | | | 9,815,288 | | |
Class S Shares | | | 113,301 | | | | | | 99,741 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 100,165 | | |
| | $ | 39,708,138 | | | | | $ | 26,759,698 | | | | | $ | 15,905,189 | | | | | $ | 10,015,578 | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($0.001 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | 41,123 | | | | | | 183,355 | | | | | | 16,794 | | | | | | 10,000 | | |
Class I Shares | | | 3,647,883 | | | | | | 2,549,300 | | | | | | 1,493,150 | | | | | | 980,104 | | |
Class S Shares | | | 10,555 | | | | | | 10,222 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 10,002 | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | $ | 10.72 | | | | | $ | 9.75 | | | | | $ | 10.52 | | | | | $ | 10.01 | | |
Class I Shares | | $ | 10.73 | | | | | $ | 9.76 | | | | | $ | 10.53 | | | | | $ | 10.01 | | |
Class S Shares | | $ | 10.73 | | | | | $ | 9.76 | | | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 10.01 | | |
Maximum Sales Charge - Class A Shares | | | 4.75% | | | | | | 4.75% | | | | | | 5.00% | | | | | | 4.75% | | |
Maximum Offering Price per share (Net Asset Value/(100%-maximum | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
sales charge)) - Class A Shares | | $ | 11.25 | | | | | $ | 10.24 | | | | | $ | 11.07 | | | | | $ | 10.51 | | |
Total Investments, at cost | | $ | 37,151,035 | | | | | $ | 26,157,128 | | | | | $ | 14,881,184 | | | | | $ | 10,171,652 | | |
Foreign currency, at cost | | $ | 271 | | | | | $ | 270,335 | | | | | $ | 46,459 | | | | | $ | 186 | | |
28 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Operations - For the period ended April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | Emerging | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Emerging | | | | Markets | | | | Frontier | | | | Total | |
| | Markets | | | Local Debt | | | Markets | | | | Return | |
| Debt Fund | | | Fund | | | | Fund | | | | Fund(a) | |
Investment Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 1,037,327 | | | | | $ | 463,548 | | | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 13,373 | | |
Dividends | | | 35 | | | | | | 829 | | | | | | 470,656 | | | | | | 56 | | |
Foreign tax withholding | | | — | | | | | | (15,970 | ) | | | | | (20,792 | ) | | | | | — | | |
Total Investment Income | | | 1,037,362 | | | | | | 448,407 | | | | | | 449,864 | | | | | | 13,429 | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | | 90,239 | | | | | | 64,694 | | | | | | 91,697 | | | | | | 7,432 | | |
Advisory Services: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operational Support - Class A Shares | | | 375 | | | | | | 1,794 | | | | | | 127 | | | | | | 18 | | |
Operational Support - Class I Shares | | | 17,807 | | | | | | 11,993 | | | | | | 7,272 | | | | | | 857 | | |
Administration: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | 92 | | | | | | 439 | | | | | | 28 | | | | | | 2 | | |
Class I Shares | | | 8,714 | | | | | | 5,866 | | | | | | 3,149 | | | | | | 171 | | |
Class S Shares | | | 26 | | | | | | 23 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 2 | | |
Shareholder Servicing: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | 396 | | | | | | 2,165 | | | | | | 96 | | | | | | 20 | | |
Accounting | | | 31,110 | | | | | | 28,547 | | | | | | 27,387 | | | | | | 628 | | |
Compliance Service | | | 400 | | | | | | 330 | | | | | | 132 | | | | | | 22 | | |
Custodian | | | 8,605 | | | | | | 41,225 | | | | | | 34,690 | | | | | | 6,628 | | |
Printing | | | 16,478 | | | | | | 12,287 | | | | | | 12,788 | | | | | | 1,239 | | |
Professional | | | 1,791 | | | | | | 1,333 | | | | | | 845 | | | | | | 216 | | |
Transfer Agent | | | 14,878 | | | | | | 14,915 | | | | | | 7,912 | | | | | | 2 | | |
Trustee | | | 1,042 | | | | | | 782 | | | | | | 378 | | | | | | 144 | | |
Registration fees | | | 19,224 | | | | | | 22,743 | | | | | | 7,335 | | | | | | 1,530 | | |
Other | | | 5,752 | | | | | | 4,806 | | | | | | 3,642 | | | | | | 1,675 | | |
Total expenses before fee reductions | | | 216,929 | | | | | | 213,942 | | | | | | 197,678 | | | | | | 20,586 | | |
Fees contractually reduced by Investment Adviser | | | (62,933 | ) | | | | | (100,952 | ) | | | | | (61,793 | ) | | | | | (9,634 | ) | |
Net Expenses | | | 153,996 | | | | | | 112,990 | | | | | | 135,885 | | | | | | 10,952 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income (Loss) | | | 883,366 | | | | | | 335,417 | | | | | | 313,979 | | | | | | 2,477 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investment securities and foreign currency transactions | | | (108,453 | ) | | | | | (368,546 | ) | | | | | (272,772 | ) | | | | | 5,855 | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from swap agreements | | | 13,320 | | | | | | 87,258 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from options transactions | | | — | | | | | | 23,195 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 47,633 | | | | | | 132,979 | | | | | | (9,378 | ) | | | | | 122 | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | 1,775,053 | | | | | | 543,724 | | | | | | 1,303,379 | | | | | | 7,124 | | |
Net realized/unrealized gains from investments | | | 1,727,553 | | | | | | 418,610 | | | | | | 1,021,229 | | | | | | 13,101 | | |
Change In Net Assets Resulting From Operations | | $ | 2,610,919 | | | | | $ | 754,027 | | | | | $ | 1,335,208 | | | | | $ | 15,578 | | |
____________________
(a) | Commenced operations on March 30, 2012. |
See notes to financial statements. | | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 29 |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund |
| | | | | | | For the period | | | | | | | | For the period |
| | For the six | | | | ended | | | | For the six | | | | ended | |
| months ended | | October 31, | | months ended | | October 31, |
| April 30, 2012 | | | 2011(a) | | | April 30, 2012 | | | 2011(a) | |
| (Unaudited) | | | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | | |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | $ | 883,366 | | | | | $ | 936,346 | | | | | $ | 335,417 | | | | | $ | 357,731 | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | (47,500 | ) | | | | | 20,688 | | | | | | (125,114 | ) | | | | | (303,861 | ) | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | 1,775,053 | | | | | | 664,428 | | | | | | 543,724 | | | | | | (911,401 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | 2,610,919 | | | | | | 1,621,462 | | | | | | 754,027 | | | | | | (857,531 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | (9,023 | ) | | | | | (6,868 | ) | | | | | (10,703 | ) | | | | | (7,609 | ) | |
Class I Shares | | | (910,575 | ) | | | | | (901,845 | ) | | | | | (181,651 | ) | | | | | (247,296 | ) | |
Class S Shares | | | (2,807 | ) | | | | | (2,868 | ) | | | | | (774 | ) | | | | | (1,037 | ) | |
Net realized gains: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | (82 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Class I Shares | | | (7,859 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Class S Shares | | | (24 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Return of capital: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | (2,600 | ) | |
Class I Shares | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | (84,499 | ) | |
Class S Shares | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | (354 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from shareholder dividends | | | (930,370 | ) | | | | | (911,581 | ) | | | | | (193,128 | ) | | | | | (343,395 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | | 3,310,119 | | | | | | 34,007,589 | | | | | | 208,586 | | | | | | 27,191,139 | | |
Change in Net assets | | | 4,990,668 | | | | | | 34,717,470 | | | | | | 769,485 | | | | | | 25,990,213 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 34,717,470 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 25,990,213 | | | | | | — | | |
End of period | | $ | 39,708,138 | | | | | $ | 34,717,470 | | | | | $ | 26,759,698 | | | | | $ | 25,990,213 | | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | $ | 14,278 | | | | | $ | 53,317 | | | | | $ | (64,182 | ) | | | | $ | (206,471 | ) | |
____________________
(a) | Commenced operations on April 7, 2011. |
30 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| | Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund |
| | | | | | | | For the period | | | | | | | | For the period |
| | For the six | | ended | | For the six | | ended |
| | months ended | | October 31, | | months ended | | October 31, |
| | April 30, 2012 | | 2011(a) | | April 30, 2012 | | 2011(a) |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | | | |
CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | $ | 93,314 | | | | | $ | 345,825 | | | | | $ | 36,579 | | | | | $ | 1,871,102 | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 9,105 | | | | | | 6,868 | | | | | | 10,698 | | | | | | 10,209 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (34,611 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | | (106,365 | ) | | | | | — | | |
Class A Shares capital transactions | | | | 67,808 | | | | | | 352,693 | | | | | | (59,088 | ) | | | | | 1,881,311 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | 3,381,488 | | | | | | 34,302,757 | | | | | | 98,416 | | | | | | 24,876,657 | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 914,161 | | | | | | 901,809 | | | | | | 181,483 | | | | | | 331,795 | | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (1,056,169 | ) | | | | | (1,652,538 | ) | | | | | (12,999 | ) | | | | | (15 | ) | |
Class I Shares capital transactions | | | | 3,239,480 | | | | | | 33,552,028 | | | | | | 266,900 | | | | | | 25,208,437 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class S Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | — | | | | | | 100,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 100,000 | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 2,831 | | | | | | 2,868 | | | | | | 774 | | | | | | 1,391 | | |
Class S Shares capital transactions | | | | 2,831 | | | | | | 102,868 | | | | | | 774 | | | | | | 101,391 | | |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | | $ | 3,310,119 | | | | | $ | 34,007,589 | | | | | $ | 208,586 | | | | | $ | 27,191,139 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 8,840 | | | | | | 33,986 | | | | | | 3,818 | | | | | | 188,305 | | |
Reinvested | | | | 877 | | | | | | 676 | | | | | | 1,132 | | | | | | 1,054 | | |
Redeemed | | | | (3,256 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | | (10,954 | ) | | | | | — | | |
Change in Class A Shares | | | | 6,461 | | | | | | 34,662 | | | | | | (6,004 | ) | | | | | 189,359 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 317,936 | | | | | | 3,417,116 | | | | | | 10,215 | | | | | | 2,487,763 | | |
Reinvested | | | | 88,003 | | | | | | 88,707 | | | | | | 19,120 | | | | | | 33,541 | | |
Redeemed | | | | (101,816 | ) | | | | | (162,063 | ) | | | | | (1,338 | ) | | | | | (1 | ) | |
Change in Class I Shares | | | | 304,123 | | | | | | 3,343,760 | | | | | | 27,997 | | | | | | 2,521,303 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class S Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | — | | | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 10,000 | | |
Reinvested | | | | 273 | | | | | | 282 | | | | | | 81 | | | | | | 141 | | |
Change in Class S Shares | | | | 273 | | | | | | 10,282 | | | | | | 81 | | | | | | 10,141 | | |
____________________
(a) | Commenced operations on April 7, 2011. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 31 |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| | Frontier Markets Fund | | Total Return Fund |
| | | | | | | | For the period | | | | | | |
| | For the six | | ended | | For the period |
| | months ended | | October 31, | | ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | | 2011(b) | | April 30, 2012(c) |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | | | (Unaudited) |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | $ | 313,979 | | | | | $ | 1,837 | | | | | $ | 2,477 | | |
Net realized gains (losses) from investments | | | | (282,150 | ) | | | | | (100,622 | ) | | | | | 5,977 | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | | 1,303,379 | | | | | | (397,347 | ) | | | | | 7,124 | | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | | 1,335,208 | | | | | | (496,132 | ) | | | | | 15,578 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | (102 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Class I Shares | | | | (28,979 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | | (1,046 | ) | |
Class S Shares | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | (18 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from shareholder dividends | | | | (29,081 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | | (1,064 | ) | |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | | | 95,194 | | | | | | 15,000,000 | | | | | | 10,001,064 | | |
Change in Net Assets | | | | 1,401,321 | | | | | | 14,503,868 | | | | | | 10,015,578 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | | 14,503,868 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
End of period | | | $ | 15,905,189 | | | | | $ | 14,503,868 | | | | | $ | 10,015,578 | | |
Accumulated net investment income (loss) | | | $ | 277,622 | | | | | $ | (7,276 | ) | | | | $ | 1,413 | | |
____________________
(b) | Commenced operations on September 7, 2011. |
(c) | Commenced operations on March 30, 2012. |
32 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| | Frontier Markets Fund | | Total Return Fund |
| | | | | | | | For the period | | | | | |
| | For the six | | ended | | For the period |
| | months ended | | October 31, | | ended |
| | April 30, 2012 | | 2011(b) | | April 30, 2012(c) |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | | (Unaudited) |
CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | $ | 66,461 | | | | | $ | 100,000 | | | | $ | 100,000 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 102 | | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | (348 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Class A Shares capital transactions | | | | 66,215 | | | | | | 100,000 | | | | | 100,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | — | | | | | | 14,900,000 | | | | | 9,800,000 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | 28,979 | | | | | | — | | | | | 1,046 | |
Value of shares redeemed | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Class I Shares capital transactions | | | | 28,979 | | | | | | 14,900,000 | | | | | 9,801,046 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class S Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares issued | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | 100,000 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | 18 | |
Class S Shares capital transactions | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | 100,018 | |
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | | | $ | 95,194 | | | | | $ | 15,000,000 | | | | $ | 10,001,064 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SHARE TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | 6,818 | | | | | | 10,000 | | | | | 10,000 | |
Reinvested | | | | 11 | | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Redeemed | | | | (35 | ) | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Change in Class A Shares | | | | 6,794 | | | | | | 10,000 | | | | | 10,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | — | | | | | | 1,490,000 | | | | | 980,000 | |
Reinvested | | | | 3,150 | | | | | | — | | | | | 104 | |
Redeemed | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Change in Class I Shares | | | | 3,150 | | | | | | 1,490,000 | | | | | 980,104 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class S Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | 10,000 | |
Reinvested | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | 2 | |
Change in Class S Shares | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | 10,002 | |
____________________
(b) | Commenced operations on September 7, 2011. |
(c) | Commenced operations on March 30, 2012. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 33 |
HSBC EMERGING MARKETS DEBT FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | | Net Investment Income (Loss) | | Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Investments | | Total from Investment Activities | | Net Investment Income | | Net Realized Gains from Investment Transactions | | Total Dividends | | Net Asset Value, End of Period | | Total Return(a) | | Net Assets at End of Period (000’s) | | Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets(b) | | Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets(b) | | Ratios of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Fee Reductions)(b) | | Portfolio Turnover (a)(c) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended October 31, 2011(d) | | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | | 0.25 | | | | 0.25 | | | | 0.50 | | | | (0.27 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.27 | ) | | | | $ | 10.23 | | | | 5.02 | % | | | | $355 | | | | 1.20 | % | | | | 4.81 | % | | | | 1.38 | % | | | | 10 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | $ | 10.23 | | | | | 0.19 | | | | 0.52 | | | | 0.71 | | | | (0.22 | ) | | | | — | (e) | | | | (0.22 | ) | | | | $ | 10.72 | | | | 7.36 | % | | | | $441 | | | | 1.20 | % | | | | 4.88 | % | | | | 1.48 | % | | | | 21 | % | |
CLASS I SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended October 31, 2011(d) | | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | | 0.29 | | | | 0.24 | | | | 0.53 | | | | (0.28 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.28 | ) | | | | $ | 10.25 | | | | 5.34 | % | | | | $34,257 | | | | 0.85 | % | | | | 5.07 | % | | | | 1.12 | % | | | | 10 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | $ | 10.25 | | | | | 0.22 | | | | 0.52 | | | | 0.74 | | | | (0.25 | ) | | | | — | (e) | | | | (0.25 | ) | | | | $ | 10.73 | | | | 7.41 | % | | | | $39,154 | | | | 0.85 | % | | | | 4.88 | % | | | | 1.20 | % | | | | 21 | % | |
CLASS S SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended October 31, 2011(d) | | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | | 0.30 | | | | 0.23 | | | | 0.53 | | | | (0.28 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.28 | ) | | | | $ | 10.25 | | | | 5.39 | % | | | | $105 | | | | 0.75 | % | | | | 5.14 | % | | | | 1.02 | % | | | | 10 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | $ | 10.25 | | | | | 0.24 | | | | 0.51 | | | | 0.75 | | | | (0.27 | ) | | | | — | (e) | | | | (0.27 | ) | | | | $ | 10.73 | | | | 7.46 | % | | | | $113 | | | | 0.75 | % | | | | 4.88 | % | | | | 1.09 | % | | | | 21 | % | |
(a) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any redemption charges. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without the distinguishing between the classes of shares issued. |
(d) | Commenced operations on April 7, 2011. |
(e) | Represents less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
34 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
HSBC EMERGING MARKETS LOCAL DEBT FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of | | | | | | | Ratios of | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Expenses | | | | | | | Expenses to | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Net Realized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to Average | | Ratio of Net | | Average Net | | | | | |
| | Net Asset | | | | | | and Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Net Assets | | Investment | | Assets | | | | | |
| | Value, | | Net | | Gains (Losses) | | Total from | | Net | | Return | | | | | | | Net Asset | | | | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | (Excluding | | Income to | | (Excluding | | Portfolio |
| | Beginning | | Investment | | from | | Investment | | Investment | | of | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | Interest | | Average Net | | Fee | | Turnover |
| | of Period | | Income (Loss) | | Investments | | Activities | | Income | | Capital | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(a) | | (000’s) | | Assets(b) | | Expense)(b) | | Assets(b) | | Reductions) (b) | | (a)(c) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended October 31, 2011(d) | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | 0.12 | | | | (0.46 | ) | | | | (0.34 | ) | | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | (0.12 | ) | | | | $ | 9.54 | | | | (3.43 | )% | | | | $1,807 | | | | 1.26 | % | | | | 1.20 | % | | | | 2.29 | % | | | | 1.66 | % | | | | 66 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | $9.54 | | | | 0.13 | | | | 0.14 | | | | | 0.27 | | | | | (0.06 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.06 | ) | | | | $ | 9.75 | | | | 2.71 | % | | | | $1,787 | | | | 1.20 | % | | | | 1.20 | % | | | | 2.59 | % | | | | 1.97 | % | | | | 19 | % | |
CLASS I SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended October 31, 2011(d) | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | 0.13 | | | | (0.45 | ) | | | | (0.32 | ) | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | (0.13 | ) | | | | $ | 9.55 | | | | (3.21 | )% | | | | $24,086 | | | | 0.91 | % | | | | 0.85 | % | | | | 2.46 | % | | | | 1.32 | % | | | | 66 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | $9.55 | | | | 0.12 | | | | 0.16 | | | | | 0.28 | | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | | $ | 9.76 | | | | 2.87 | % | | | | $24,873 | | | | 0.85 | % | | | | 0.85 | % | | | | 2.59 | % | | | | 1.63 | % | | | | 19 | % | |
CLASS S SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended October 31, 2011(d) | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | 0.14 | | | | (0.45 | ) | | | | (0.31 | ) | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | | (0.14 | ) | | | | $ | 9.55 | | | | (3.16 | )% | | | | $97 | | | | 0.81 | % | | | | 0.75 | % | | | | 2.58 | % | | | | 1.22 | % | | | | 66 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | $9.55 | | | | 0.12 | | | | 0.16 | | | | | 0.28 | | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | | — | | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | | $ | 9.76 | | | | 2.91 | % | | | | $100 | | | | 0.75 | % | | | | 0.75 | % | | | | 2.59 | % | | | | 1.53 | % | | | | 19 | % | |
(a) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any redemption charges. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without the distinguishing between the classes of shares issued. |
(d) | Commenced operations on April 7, 2011. |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 35 |
HSBC FRONTIER MARKETS FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Ratios of | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Net Realized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Investment | | Expenses | | | | | |
| | Net Asset | | | | | | | and Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Income | | to Average | | | | | |
| | Value, | | Net | | Gains (Losses) | | Total from | | Net | | | | | | | Net Asset | | | | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | (Loss) to | | Net Assets | | Portfolio |
| | Beginning | | Investment | | from | | Investment | | Investment | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | Average Net | | (Excluding | | Turnover |
| | of Period | | Income (Loss) | | Investments | | Activities | | Income | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(a) | | (000’s) | | Assets(b) | | Assets(b) | | Fee Reductions)(b) | | (a)(c) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended October 31, 2011(d) | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | — | (e) | | | | (0.34 | ) | | | | (0.34 | ) | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | $9.66 | | | | (3.40 | )% | | | | | $97 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | | (0.26 | )% | | | | 2.57 | % | | | | 6 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | $9.66 | | | | 0.16 | | | | | 0.70 | | | | | 0.86 | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | $ | 10.52 | | | | 9.02 | % | | | | | $177 | | | | 2.20 | % | | | | 4.94 | % | | | | 2.84 | % | | | | 10 | % | |
CLASS I SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended October 31, 2011(d) | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | — | (e) | | | | (0.33 | ) | | | | (0.33 | ) | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | | $9.67 | | | | (3.30 | )% | | | | $ | 14,407 | | | | 1.96 | % | | | | 0.09 | % | | | | 2.23 | % | | | | 6 | % | |
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | $9.67 | | | | 0.21 | | | | | 0.67 | | | | | 0.88 | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | | $ | 10.53 | | | | 9.12 | % | | | | $ | 15,728 | | | | 1.85 | % | | | | 4.26 | % | | | | 2.50 | % | | | | 10 | % | |
(a) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any sales or redemption charges. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without the distinguishing between the classes of shares issued. |
(d) | Commenced operations on September 6, 2011. |
(e) | Represents less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
36 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS | See notes to financial statements. |
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | Investment Activities | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratios/Supplementary Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | Ratios of | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Net Realized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Investment | | Expenses | | | | | |
| | Net Asset | | | | | | | and Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Assets | | Ratio of Net | | Income | | to Average | | | | | |
| | Value, | | Net | | Gains (Losses) | | Total from | | Net | | | | | | | Net Asset | | | | | | | at End of | | Expenses to | | (Loss) to | | Net Assets | | Portfolio |
| | Beginning | | Investment | | from | | Investment | | Investment | | Total | | Value, End | | Total | | Period | | Average Net | | Average Net | | (Excluding Fee | | Turnover |
| | of Period | | Income (Loss) | | Investments | | Activities | | Income | | Dividends | | of Period | | Return(a) | | (000’s) | | Assets(b) | | Assets(b) | | Reductions)(b) | | (a)(c) |
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited)(d) | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | — | (e) | | | | 0.01 | | | | 0.01 | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | $ | 10.01 | | | | 0.10 | % | | | | | $100 | | | | 1.60 | % | | | | 0.02 | % | | | | 2.67 | % | | | | 12 | % | |
CLASS I SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited)(d) | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | — | (e) | | | | 0.01 | | | | 0.01 | | | | — | (e) | | | | — | (e) | | | | $ | 10.01 | | | | 0.11 | % | | | | $ | 9,815 | | | | 1.25 | % | | | | 0.36 | % | | | | 2.35 | % | | | | 12 | % | |
CLASS S SHARES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended April 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited)(d) | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | — | (e) | | | | 0.01 | | | | 0.01 | | | | — | (e) | | | | — | (e) | | | | $ | 10.01 | | | | 0.12 | % | | | | | $100 | | | | 1.15 | % | | | | 0.28 | % | | | | 2.25 | % | | | | 12 | % | |
(a) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. Total return calculations do not include any sales or redemption charges. |
(b) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(c) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without the distinguishing between the classes of shares issued. |
(d) | Commenced operations on March 30, 2012. |
(e) | Represents less than $0.005 or $(0.005). |
See notes to financial statements. | HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 37 |
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
1. Organization:
The HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds) (the “Trust’’), a Massachusetts business trust organized on April 22, 1987, and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act’’), as an open-end management investment company. As of April 30, 2012, the Trust is comprised of 16 separate operational funds, each a series of the HSBC Family of Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Family of Funds), which also includes the HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and the HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (collectively the “Trusts’’). The accompanying financial statements are presented for the following 4 funds (individually a “Fund,’’ collectively the “Funds’’ or the “Emerging Markets Funds”):
Fund | | Short Name | |
HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund | Emerging Markets Debt Fund |
HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund |
HSBC Frontier Markets Fund | Frontier Markets Fund |
HSBC Total Return Fund | Total Return Fund |
Each of the Funds is a non-diversified fund. Financial statements for all other funds of the Trusts are published separately.
The Funds are authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with a par value of $0.001 per share. The Emerging Markets Debt Fund, the Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund and the Total Return Fund (“Debt Funds’’) are authorized to issue three classes of shares: Class A Shares, Class I Shares, and Class S Shares. Class A Shares of the Debt Funds have a maximum sales charge of 4.75% as a percentage of the original purchase price. The Frontier Markets Fund is authorized to issue two classes of shares: Class A Shares and Class I Shares. Class A Shares of the Frontier Markets Fund has a maximum sales charge of 5.00% as a percentage of the original purchase price. Each class of shares in each Fund has identical rights and privileges, except with respect to arrangements pertaining to shareholder servicing and/or distribution, class-related expenses, voting rights on matters affecting a single class of shares, and exchange privileges of each class of shares.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, the Funds’ officers and Trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Trust may enter into contracts with its service providers, which also provide for indemnifications by the Funds. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds. However, based on experience, the Trust expects the risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies:
The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements. The policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP’’). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities Valuation:
The Funds record their investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 3 below.
Investment Transactions and Related Income:
Investment transactions are accounted for not later than on the business day after trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Investment gains and losses are calculated on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization or accretion of premium or discount. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date except in the case of foreign securities, in which case dividends are recorded as soon as such information becomes available.
38 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Foreign Currency Translation:
The accounting records of the Funds are maintained in U.S. dollars. Foreign currency amounts are translated into U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange to determine the value of investments, assets and liabilities. Purchases and sales of securities, and income and expenses are translated at the prevailing rate of exchange on the respective dates of such transactions. The Funds do not isolate the portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss from investments and foreign currencies.
Income received by the Funds from sources within foreign countries may be subject to withholding and other income or similar taxes imposed by such countries. The Funds accrue such taxes, as applicable, based on their current interpretation of tax rules in the foreign markets in which they invest.
Restricted and Illiquid Securities:
A restricted security is a security which has been purchased through a private offering and cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act’’) or pursuant to the resale limitations provided by Rule 144 under the 1933 Act, or another exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act. Certain restricted securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers, and may be deemed liquid by the Investment Adviser (as defined in Note 4) based on procedures established by the Board of Trustees (the “Board’’). Therefore, not all restricted securities are considered illiquid. At April 30, 2012, the Funds did not hold any restricted securities that were not deemed liquid.
Participation Notes and Participatory Notes:
The Frontier Markets Fund may invest in participation notes or participatory notes (“P-notes”). P-notes are participation interest notes that are issued by banks or broker-dealers and are designed to offer a return linked to a particular underlying equity, debt, currency or market. If the P-note were held to maturity, the issuer would pay to, or receive from, the purchaser the difference between the nominal value of the underlying instrument at the time of purchase and that instrument’s value at maturity. The holder of a P-note that is linked to a particular underlying security or instrument may be entitled to receive any dividends paid in connection with that underlying security or instrument, but typically does not receive voting rights as it would if it directly owned the underlying security or instrument. P-notes involve transaction costs. Investments in P-notes involve the same risks associated with a direct investment in the underlying securities, instruments or markets that they seek to replicate. In addition, there can be no assurance that there will be a trading market for a P-note or that the trading price of a P-note will equal the underlying value of the security, instrument or market that it seeks to replicate. Due to liquidity and transfer restrictions, the secondary markets on which a P-note is traded may be less liquid than the market for other securities, or may be completely illiquid, which may also affect the ability of a fund to accurately value a P-note. P-notes typically constitute general unsecured contractual obligations of the banks or broker- dealers that issue them, which subjects the Fund that holds them to counterparty risk (and this risk may be amplified if the Fund purchases P-notes from only a small number of issuers).
Derivative Instruments:
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts:
Each Fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The Funds may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts in connection with planned purchases or sales of securities, to hedge the U.S. dollar value of securities denominated in a particular currency or to enhance return. The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any gains or losses are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gains or losses until the contract settlement date.
The Funds could be exposed to risks if the counterparties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts and from unanticipated movements in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar.
The Funds remain subject to credit risk with respect to the amount they expect to receive from counterparties. However, the Funds have sought to mitigate these risks by generally requiring the posting of collateral to a Fund at prearranged exposure levels to cover a Fund’s exposure to the counterparty.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 39
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
During the period ended April 30, 2012, the Funds entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purpose of enhancing each Fund’s return. The notional amount of forward foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding as of April 30, 2012 and the monthly average notional amount for these contracts during the fiscal period ended April 30, 2012 were as follows:
| | Outstanding | | Monthly Average |
| | Notional Amount | | Notional Amount |
| Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts: | | | | | | | | | |
| Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | | $1,857,450 | | | | | $1,688,980 | |
| Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | | 39,250,283 | | | | | 32,755,650 | |
| Total Return Fund | | | 3,768,811 | | | | | 3,426,192 | |
Options Contracts:
The Funds may purchase or write put and call options on securities, indices, foreign currencies and derivative instruments. When purchasing options, the Funds pay a premium which is recorded as the cost basis in the investment and which is subsequently marked to market to reflect the current value of the option. Premiums paid for purchasing options that expire are treated as realized losses. When an option is exercised or closed, premiums paid for purchasing options are offset against proceeds to determine the realized gain or loss on the transaction. When writing options, the Funds receive a premium which is recorded as a liability and which is subsequently marked to market to reflect the current value of the option written. Premiums received from writing options that expire are treated as realized gains. Premiums received from writing options that are either exercised or closed are offset against the proceeds received or the amount paid on the transaction to determine the realized gains or losses.
The Funds may purchase or write put and call options on foreign currencies for the purpose of protecting against declines in the dollar value of foreign portfolio securities and against increases in the U.S. dollar cost of foreign securities to be acquired. The Funds could be exposed to risks if the counterparties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts and from unanticipated movements in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar.
The Funds may enter into interest rate swaption agreements for hedging purposes. A swaption is an option to enter into a pre-defined swap agreement by some specified date in the future. The writer of the swaption becomes the counterparty to the swap if the buyer exercises their option. The interest rate swaption agreement will specify whether the buyer of the swaption will be a fixed rate receiver or a fixed rate buyer. The Funds could be exposed to risks if the counterparties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts and from unanticipated movements in interest rates.
During the period ended April 30, 2012, the Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund and the Total Return Fund invested in options on foreign currencies for the purpose of protecting against declines in the dollar value of foreign portfolio securities and against increases in the U.S. dollar cost of foreign securities to be acquired. The Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund also entered into interest rate swaption agreements for hedging purposes.
The Funds remain subject to credit risk with respect to the amount they expect to receive from counterparties. However, the Emerging Markets Funds have sought to mitigate these risks by generally requiring the posting of collateral to an Emerging Markets Fund at prearranged exposure levels to cover an Emerging Markets Fund’s exposure to the counterparty.
The Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund and the Total Return Fund had the following transactions in purchased call and put options during the period ended April 30, 2012:
| | | Number of | | | |
| Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | Contracts | | Cost |
| Options outstanding at October 31, 2011 | | — | | | $— |
| Options purchased | | 1,000,000 | | | 12,600 |
| Options outstanding at April 30, 2012 | | 1,000,000 | | $ | 12,600 |
| |
| | | Number of | | | |
| Total Return Fund | | Contracts | | | Cost |
| Options outstanding at October 31, 2011 | | — | | | $— |
| Options purchased | | 700,000 | | | 8,085 |
| Options outstanding at April 30, 2012 | | 700,000 | | | $8,085 |
40 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
The Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund had the following transactions in written call and put options during the period ended April 30, 2012:
| | Number of | | Premiums |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | Contracts | | Received |
Options outstanding at October 31, 2011 | | — | | | | $— | |
Options written | | (903,260 | ) | | | (45,730 | ) |
Options exercised | | 400,000 | | | | 4,183 | |
Options expired | | 3,260 | | | | 28,947 | |
Options outstanding at April 30, 2012 | | (500,000 | ) | | $ | (12,600 | ) |
Futures Contracts:
The Funds may invest in futures contracts for the purpose of hedging existing portfolio securities or securities they intend to purchase against fluctuations in fair value caused by changes in prevailing market interest conditions. Upon entering into futures contracts, the Funds are required to pledge to the broker an amount of cash and/or other assets equal to a certain percentage of the contract amount (initial margin deposit). Subsequent payments, known as “variation margin”, are made or received each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the fair value of the underlying security. The Funds recognize a gain or loss equal to the daily variation margin. Should market conditions move unexpectedly, the Funds may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in market value of the securities held by the Funds and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The Emerging Markets Funds did not invest in futures contracts during the period ended April 30, 2012.
Swap Agreements:
The Funds may enter into swap contracts and other similar instruments in accordance with their investment objectives and policies. A swap is an agreement to exchange the return generated by one instrument for the return generated by another instrument. The payment streams are calculated by reference to a specified index and agreed upon notional amount. The term specified index includes currencies, fixed interest rates, prices and total return on interest rate indices, fixed income indices, stock indices and commodity indices.
The Funds will usually enter into swaps on a net basis, which means that the two return streams are netted out in a cash settlement on the payment date or dates specified in the instrument, with a Fund receiving or paying only the net amount of the two returns. Upfront receipts and payments are recorded as deferred income (liability) or deferred expense (asset), as the case may be. These upfront receipts and payments are amortized to income or expense over the life of the swap agreement. Until a swap agreement is settled in cash, the gain or loss on the notional amount plus income on the instruments, less the interest paid by the Fund on the notional amount, is recorded as “unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap agreements” and, when cash is exchanged, the gain or loss realized is recorded as “realized gains or losses on swap agreements”. A Fund’s obligations under a swap agreement will be accrued daily (offset against any amounts owing to the Fund) and any accrued but unpaid net amounts owed to a swap counterparty will be covered by the maintenance of a segregated account consisting of cash, U.S. government securities, or other liquid securities or by pledging such securities as collateral.
Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of commitments to pay and receive interest based on a notional amount and are subject to interest rate risk exposure. Interest rate swaps do not involve the delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to interest rate swaps is limited to the net amount of interest payments that a Fund is contractually obligated to make. If the other party to an interest rate swap defaults, a Fund’s risk of loss consists of the net amount of interest payments that the Fund is contractually entitled to receive.
Credit default swap agreements involve one party making a stream of payments (referred to as the buyer of protection) to another party (the seller of protection) in exchange for the right to receive a specified return in the event of a default or other credit event for the referenced entity, obligation or index and are subject to credit risk exposure. The maximum potential amount of future payments that a Fund as a seller of protection could be required to make under a credit default
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 41
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
swap agreement would be an amount equal to the notional amount of the agreement. Notional amounts of each individual credit default swap agreement outstanding as of April 30, 2012 for which a Fund is the seller of protection are disclosed in the Schedules of Portfolio Investments. These potential amounts would be partially offset by any recovery values of the respective referenced obligations, upfront payments received upon entering into the agreement, or net amounts received from the settlement of buy protection credit default swap agreements entered into by a Fund for the same referenced entity or entities.
The Funds remain subject to credit risk with respect to the amount they expect to receive from counterparties. However, the Funds have sought to mitigate these risks by generally requiring the posting of collateral to a Fund at prearranged exposure levels to cover a Fund’s exposure to the counterparty.
The use of swaps is a highly specialized activity that involves investment techniques and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. If the Investment Adviser is incorrect in its forecasts of market values, interest rates and currency exchange rates, the investment performance of a Fund would be less favorable than it would have been if this investment technique were not used.
During the period ended April 30, 2012, the Emerging Markets Debt Fund and the Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage their exposure to interest rates and as a substitute for investing directly in securities. The Emerging Markets Debt Fund also entered into credit default swap agreements primarily to manage and/or gain exposure to credit risk. The notional amount of swap agreements outstanding as of April 30, 2012 and the monthly average notional amount for these agreements during the fiscal period ended April 30, 2012 were as follows:
| | Outstanding | | Monthly Average |
| | Notional Amount | | Notional Amount |
| Interest Rate Swap Agreements: | | | | | |
| Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | $ | 1,634,533 | | $ | 5,524,939 |
| Credit Default Swap Agreements: | | | | | |
| Emerging Markets Debt Fund | $ | 1,550,000 | | $ | 2,150,000 |
Summary of Derivative Instruments:
The following is a summary of the fair value of derivative instruments as of April 30, 2012:
| | Asset Derivatives | | | | | | Liability Derivatives |
| | Statement of | | | | | | | | Statement of | | | | |
| | Assets and | | | | Total Fair | | Assets and | | Total Fair |
Primary Risk Exposure | | Liabilities Location | | Fund | | Value($)* | | Liabilities Location | | Value($)* |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | Unrealized appreciation on | | Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | | 24,222 | | | Unrealized depreciation on | | | 16,235 | |
| | forward foreign currency | | Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | | 371,885 | | | forward foreign currency | | | 337,787 | |
| | exchange contracts | | Total Return Fund | | | 48,383 | | | exchange contracts | | | 32,446 | |
| |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | Investment securities, at | | Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | | 15,664 | | | Written options | | | 23,004 | |
| | value (purchased options) | | Total Return Fund | | | 1,511 | | | | | | — | |
| |
Credit Contracts | | Unrealized appreciation on | | Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | | 20,389 | | | Unrealized depreciation on | | | — | |
| | swap agreements | | | | | | | | swap agreements | | | | |
| |
Interest Rate Contracts | | Unrealized appreciation on | | Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | | 39,431 | | | Unrealized depreciation on | | | — | |
| | swap agreements | | | | | | | | swap agreements | | | | |
____________________
* | | Total Fair Value is presented by Primary Risk Exposure. For forward foreign currency exchange contracts, such amounts represent the unrealized gain/appreciation (for asset derivatives) or loss/depreciation (for liability derivatives). For swap agreements, the amounts represent the appreciation/depreciation of these swap agreements as reported in the Portfolios of Investments and Statements of Assets and Liabilities. |
42 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statements of Operations for the period ended April 30, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | | Change in |
| | | | | | | | | | | Unrealized |
| | | | | | Realized Gain | | Appreciation/ |
| | | | | | (Loss) on | | Depreciation on |
| | Location of Gain (Loss) | | | | Derivatives | | Derivatives |
| | on Derivatives | | | | Recognized | | Recognized |
Primary Risk Exposure | | Recognized in Income | | Fund | | in Income($) | | in Income($) |
Foregin Exchange Contracts | | Net realized gains (losses) from | | Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | | 47,633 | | | | | (5,310 | ) | |
| | foreign currency transactions, | | Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | | 132,979 | | | | | (89,414 | ) | |
| | Change in unrealized appreciation/ | | Frontier Markets Fund | | | (9,378 | ) | | | | — | | |
| | depreciation on foreign currency | | Total Return Fund | | | 122 | | | | | 15,937 | | |
| | transactions | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Foregin Exchange Contracts | | Net realized gains (losses) on | | Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | | 23,195 | | | | | (7,340 | ) | |
| | options contracts/change in | | Total Return Fund | | | — | | | | | (6,574 | ) | |
| | unrealized appreciation/ | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | depreciation on investments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Credit Contracts | | Net realized gains/(losses) from swap | | Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | | 13,320 | | | | | 20,088 | | |
| | agreements, Change in unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | appreciation/depreciation on swap | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | agreements | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Interest Rate Contracts | | Net realized gains/(losses) from swap | | Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | | 87,258 | | | | | (12,801 | ) | |
| | agreements, Change in unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | appreciation/depreciation on swap | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | agreements | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allocations:
Expenses directly attributable to a Fund are charged to that Fund. Expenses not directly attributable to a Fund are allocated proportionately among the applicable series within the Trusts in relation to the net assets of each fund or on another reasonable basis. Class specific expenses are charged directly to the class incurring the expense. In addition, income, expenses (other than class specific expenses), and unrealized and realized gains and losses are allocated to each class based on relative net assets on a daily basis.
Dividends to Shareholders:
Dividends from net investment income, if any, are declared and distributed monthly in the case of the Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund and Total Return Fund, and annually in the case of Frontier Markets Fund. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are declared and paid at least annually by the Funds. Additional distributions are also made to the Funds’ shareholders to the extent necessary to avoid the federal excise tax on certain undistributed income and net realized gains of regulated investment companies.
The amount and character of net investment income and net realized gains distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations which may differ from GAAP. These “book/tax’’ differences are either considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., certain gain/loss, differing treatment on certain swap agreements, and certain distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets; temporary differences (e.g., wash losses and the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains/losses on investments in passive foreign investment companies) do not require reclassification. The Funds may utilize equalization accounting for tax purposes and designate earnings and profits, including net realized gains distributed to shareholders on redemption of shares, as a part of the dividends paid deduction for income tax purposes. To the extent distributions to shareholders from net investment income and net realized gains exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes, they are reported as distributions of capital.
Redemption Fee:
A redemption fee of 2.00% is charged and recorded as paid-in-capital for any shares redeemed or exchanged after holding them for less than 30 days. This fee does not apply to shares purchased through reinvested dividends or capital gains or in other circumstance described in the Funds’ Prospectus. For the period ended April 30, 2012, no redemption fees were collected.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 43
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Federal Income Taxes:
Each Fund is a separate taxable entity for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund has qualified and intends to continue to qualify each year as a “regulated investment company’’ under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and to distribute substantially all of its taxable net investment income and net realized gains, if any, to its shareholders. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is required.
Management of the Funds has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the most recent tax year end and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
3. Investment Valuation Summary:
The valuation techniques employed by the Funds, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Funds’ investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
- Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
- Level 2: other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
- Level 3: significant unobservable inputs (including a Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Bonds and other fixed income securities (other than short-term obligations but including listed issues) are valued at the bid price as of the time net asset value is determined on the basis of valuations furnished by a pricing service, the use of which has been approved by the Funds’ Board of Trustees. In making such valuations, the pricing service utilizes both dealer-supplied valuations and matrix techniques which take into account appropriate factors such as the institutional-size trading in similar groups of securities, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics other than market data and without exclusive reliance upon quoted prices or exchanges or over-the-counter prices, since such valuations are believed to reflect more accurately the fair value of such securities and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Exchange traded, domestic equity securities are valued at the last sale price on a national securities exchange, or in the absence of recorded sales, at the readily available closing bid price on such exchanges, or at the quoted bid price in the over-the-counter market and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Exchange traded, foreign equity securities are valued in the appropriate currency on the last quoted sale price and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Foreign equity securities that are not exchange traded are valued in the appropriate currency at the average of the quoted bid and asked prices in the over-the-counter market and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Mutual funds are valued at their net asset values, as reported by such companies and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Exchange traded futures contracts are valued at their settlement price on the exchange on which they are traded and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at the current day’s interpolated foreign exchange rate, as calculated using the current day’s spot rate, and the 30 to 720 day forward rates and converted to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate of such currencies against the U.S. dollar, as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange, as provided by an approved pricing service, and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Non-exchange traded derivatives, such as swaps and options, are generally valued by using a valuation provided by an approved independent pricing service and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
44 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Securities or other assets for which market quotations are not readily available, or are deemed unreliable due to a significant event, are valued pursuant to procedures adopted by the Trusts’ Board (“Procedures”). Depending on the source and relative significance of valuation inputs, these instruments may be classified as Level 2 or Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Examples of potentially significant events that could affect the value of an individual security and thus require pricing under the Procedures include corporate actions by the issuer, announcements by the issuer relating to its earnings or products, regulatory news, natural disasters, and litigation. Examples of potentially significant events that could affect multiple securities held by a Fund include governmental actions, natural disasters, and armed conflicts.
In addition, if events materially affecting the value of foreign securities occur between the time when the exchange on which they are traded closes and the time when the Funds’ net assets are calculated, such securities may be valued using fair value pricing in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board. Management identifies possible fluctuations in foreign securities by monitoring the rise or fall in the value of a designated benchmark index. In the event of a rise or fall greater than predetermined levels, the Funds may use a systematic valuation model provided by an independent third party to value its foreign securities, rather than local market closing prices. When a Fund uses such a valuation model, the value assigned to the Fund’s foreign securities may not be the quoted or published prices of the investment on their primary markets or exchanges and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The valuation of these securities may represent a transfer between Levels 1 and 2. The number of days on which fair value prices will be used will depend on market activity and it is possible that fair value prices will be used by the Funds to a significant extent.
For the period ended April 30, 2012, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of April 30, 2012 in valuing the Funds’ investments based upon the three levels defined above:
| | LEVEL 1($) | | LEVEL 2($) | | LEVEL 3($) | | Total($) |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Yankee Dollars(a) | | — | | 37,777,611 | | | — | | 37,777,611 | |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | — | | 653,812 | | | — | | 653,812 | |
Investment Company | | 1,130,724 | | — | | | — | | 1,130,724 | |
Total Investment Securities | | 1,130,724 | | 38,431,423 | | | — | | 39,562,147 | |
Other Financial Instruments:(b) | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swap Agreements | | — | | 20,389 | | | — | | 20,389 | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | — | | 7,987 | | | — | | 7,987 | |
Total Investments | | 1,130,724 | | 38,459,799 | | | — | | 39,590,523 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Bonds(a) | | — | | 14,634,540 | | | — | | 14,634,540 | |
Yankee Dollars(a) | | — | | 1,518,578 | | | — | | 1,518,578 | |
Purchased Options | | — | | 15,664 | | | — | | 15,664 | |
Investment Company | | 9,556,596 | | — | | | — | | 9,556,596 | |
Total Investment Securities | | 9,556,596 | | 16,168,782 | | | — | | 25,725,378 | |
Other Financial Instruments:(b) | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swap Agreements | | — | | 39,431 | | | — | | 39,431 | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | — | | 34,098 | | | — | | 34,098 | |
Written Options | | — | | (23,004 | ) | | — | | (23,004 | ) |
Total Investment Securities | | 9,556,596 | | 16,222,307 | | | — | | 25,778,903 | |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 45
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
| | LEVEL 1($) | | LEVEL 2($) | | LEVEL 3($) | | Total($) |
Frontier Markets Fund | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks(a) | | | | | | | | |
Kazakhstan | | 244,499 | | 720,000 | | — | | 964,499 |
Lebanon | | 135,890 | | 72,720 | | — | | 208,610 |
United Arab Emirates | | 660,662 | | 141,233 | | — | | 801,895 |
All Other Common Stocks | | 11,374,968 | | — | | — | | 11,374,968 |
Preferred Stocks(a) | | 688,000 | | — | | — | | 688,000 |
Participatory Notes(a) | | — | | 1,131,861 | | — | | 1,131,861 |
Exchange Traded Funds | | 134,353 | | — | | — | | 134,353 |
Investment Company | | 482,974 | | — | | — | | 482,974 |
Total Investment Securities | | 13,721,346 | | 2,065,814 | | — | | 15,787,160 |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Return Fund | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Bond(a) | | — | | 250,637 | | — | | 250,637 |
Foreign Bonds(a) | | — | | 691,491 | | — | | 691,491 |
Yankee Dollars(a) | | — | | 3,755,611 | | — | | 3,755,611 |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | — | | 399,995 | | — | | 399,995 |
Purchased Options | | — | | 1,511 | | — | | 1,511 |
Investment Company | | 5,063,659 | | — | | — | | 5,063,659 |
Total Investment Securities | | 5,063,659 | | 5,099,245 | | — | | 10,162,904 |
Other Financial Instruments:(b) | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | — | | 15,937 | | — | | 15,937 |
Total Investment Securities | | 5,063,659 | | 5,115,182 | | — | | 10,178,841 |
____________________
(a) | For detailed country descriptions, see the accompanying Schedules of Portfolio Investments. |
| |
(b) | Other financial instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as forward foreign currency exchange contracts and swap agreements. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
The Trust recognizes significant transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The only significant transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 as of April 30, 2012 are related to the use of the systematic valuation model to value foreign securities in the Frontier Markets Fund.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04 (“ASU 2011-04”), “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS”. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 will have no effect on each Fund’s net assets. At this time, management is evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2011-04 on the financial statement disclosures.
46 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
4. Related Party Transactions and Other Agreements and Plans:
Investment Management:
HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (“HSBC’’ or the “Investment Adviser’’), a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC Bank USA, N.A., a national bank organized under the laws of the United States, acts as Investment Adviser to the Funds. As Investment Adviser, HSBC manages the investments of the Funds and continuously reviews, supervises and administers the Funds’ investments pursuant to an Investment Advisory Contract. For its services in this capacity, HSBC receives a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, based on the average daily net assets of Class A Shares, Class I Shares and Class S Shares, at annual rate of:
Fund | | Fee Rate(%) |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | 0.50 |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | 0.50 |
Frontier Markets Fund | | 1.25 |
Total Return Fund | | 0.85 |
HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited (the “Sub-Adviser”) acts as Sub-Adviser to the Frontier Markets Fund. The Sub-Adviser receives a fee from the Frontier Markets fund, accrued daily and paid monthly, based on average daily net assets of the Fund at an annual rate 0.70%.
HSBC also provides support services to the Funds pursuant to a Support Services Agreement. For its services in this capacity, HSBC receives a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, based on the average daily net assets of Class A Shares and Class I Shares, at an annual rate of 0.20% and 0.10%, respectively.
Administration:
HSBC serves the Funds as Administrator. Under the terms of the Administration Agreement, HSBC receives from the Funds (as well as other funds in the Trusts) a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of:
Based on Average Daily Net Assets of | | Fee Rate(%) |
Up to $10 billion | | 0.0550 |
In excess of $10 billion but not exceeding $20 billion | | 0.0350 |
In excess of $20 billion but not exceeding $50 billion | | 0.0275 |
In excess of $50 billion | | 0.0250 |
The fee breakpoints are determined on the basis of the aggregate average daily net assets of the Trusts. The fee is allocated to each series based upon its proportionate share of the aggregate net assets of the Trusts, subject to certain allocations in cases where one fund invests some or all of its assets in another fund. An amount equal to 50% of the administration fee is deemed to be class specific.
Pursuant to a Sub-Administration Agreement with HSBC, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., serves as Sub-Administrator for the Trusts, subject to the general supervision by the Trusts’ Board and HSBC. For these services, Citi is entitled to a fee, payable by HSBC, at an annual rate equivalent to the fee rates set forth above subject to certain reductions associated with services provided to new funds, minus 0.02%, which is retained by HSBC.
Under a Compliance Services Agreement between the Trusts and Citi (the “CCO Agreement’’), Citi makes an employee available to serve as the Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer (the “CCO’’). Under the CCO Agreement, Citi also provides infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Trusts’ compliance program, including support services to the CCO. For the services provided under the CCO Agreement, the Trusts paid Citi $140,088 for the six month period ended April 30, 2012, plus reimbursement of certain out of pocket expenses. Expenses incurred by each Fund are reflected on the Statements of Operations as “Compliance Services.’’ Citi pays the salary and other compensation earned by individuals performing these services, as employees of Citi.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 47
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Distribution Arrangements:
Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. (“Foreside”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foreside Financial Group LLC, serves the Trust as Distributor (the “Distributor’’). The Trust has adopted a non-compensatory Distribution Plan and Agreement (the “Distribution Plan’’) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Act. The Distribution Plan provides for reimbursement of expenses incurred by the Distributor related to distribution and marketing, at a rate not to exceed 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class A Shares (currently not being charged). For the six month period ended April 30, 2012, Foreside, as Distributor, also received $179,432 in commissions from sales of HSBC Family of Funds for Class A Shares, of which $25 were reallocated to HSBC-affiliated brokers and dealers for Class A Shares.
Shareholder Servicing:
The Trust has adopted a Shareholder Services Plan, which provides for payments to shareholder servicing agents (which primarily consist of HSBC and its affiliates) for providing various shareholder services. For performing these services, the shareholder servicing agents receive a fee that is computed daily and paid monthly up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class A Shares. The fees paid to the Distributor pursuant to the Distribution Plan and to shareholder servicing agents pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan may not exceed, in the aggregate, 0.50% annually of each Fund’s average daily net assets of Class A Shares.
Fund Accounting and Transfer Agency:
Citi provides fund accounting and transfer agency services for each Fund. As transfer agent, Citi receives a fee based on the number of funds and shareholder accounts, subject to certain minimums, reductions associated with services provided to new funds and reimbursement of certain expenses. As fund accountant, Citi receives an annual fee per Fund and share class, subject to certain minimums, reductions associated with services provided to new funds and reimbursement of certain expenses. Citi receives additional fees paid by the Trust for blue sky exemption services.
Independent Trustees:
Prior to January 1, 2012, the Trusts, in the aggregate, paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $63,000, a fee of $5,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended, a fee of $3,000 for each special telephonic meeting attended, and a fee of $5,000 for each special in-person meeting attended. The Trusts also paid each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $3,000 for each Committee on which such Trustee served as a Committee member as well as a fee of $3,000 for each Committee meeting attended. Additionally, the Trusts paid each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $6,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit Committee, who received a retainer of $8,000. The Trusts also paid Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $20,000, as well as an additional $4,000 for each regular meeting of the Board attended. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee was compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
Effective January 1, 2012, the Trusts pay each Independent Trustee an annual retainer of $100,000. The Trusts pay a fee of $10,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Trustees attended and a fee of $3,000 for each special meeting attended. The Trusts pay each Committee Chair an annual retainer of $3,000, with the exception of the Chair of the Audit Committee, who receives a retainer of $6,000. The Trusts also pay Chairman of the Board, an additional annual retainer of $24,000. In addition, for time expended on Board duties outside normal meetings, which is authorized by the Board, a Trustee is compensated at the rate of $500 per hour, up to a maximum of $3,000 per day.
48 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
Fee Reductions:
The Investment Adviser has agreed to contractually limit, through March 1, 2013, the total expenses, exclusive of interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses, of the Funds. Each Fund Class has its own expense limitations based on the average daily net assets for any full fiscal year as follows:
| | | | Current |
| | | | Contractual |
Fund | | | Class | | Expense Limitation(%) |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | A | | 1.20 |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | I | | 0.85 |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | S | | 0.75 |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | A | | 1.20 |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | I | | 0.85 |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | S | | 0.75 |
Frontier Markets Fund | | A | | 2.20 |
Frontier Markets Fund | | I | | 1.85 |
Total Return Fund | | A | | 1.60 |
Total Return Fund | | I | | 1.25 |
Total Return Fund | | S | | 1.15 |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Investment Adviser will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Investment Adviser within three years to the extent that the repayment will not cause the Fund’s operating expenses to exceed the contractual expense limit that was in effect at the time of such waiver or reimbursement. During the period ended April 30, 2012, the Investment Adviser did not recapture any of its prior contractual waivers or reimbursements. As of April 30, 2012, the repayments that may potentially be made by the Funds are as follows:
Fund | | | 2015* | | 2014* | | Total |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | $ 62,933 | | $31,279 | | 94,212 |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | 100,952 | | 41,089 | | 142,041 |
Frontier Markets Fund | | 61,793 | | 5,922 | | 15,556 |
Total Return Fund | | 9,634 | | N/A | | 7,634 |
____________________
* The year listed above the amounts is the fiscal year ending in which the amounts will no longer be able to be recoupable.
The Administrator and Citi may voluntarily waive/reimburse fees to help support the expense limits of each Fund. In addition, HSBC, in its role as Investment Adviser and Administrator, may waive/reimburse additional fees at its discretion. Any voluntary fee waivers/reimbursements are not subject to recoupment in subsequent fiscal periods. Voluntary waivers/reimbursements may be stopped at any time. Amounts waived/reimbursed by the Investment Adviser, Administrator, and Citi are reported separately on the Statements of Operations, as applicable.
5. Investment Transactions:
Cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) for the period ended April 30, 2012 were as follows:
| | Purchases($) | | Sales($) |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | 10,788,369 | | 7,343,103 |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | 5,057,250 | | 2,979,819 |
Frontier Markets Fund | | 1,759,790 | | 1,479,731 |
Total Return Fund | | 4,595,202 | | 403,688 |
For the period ended April 30, 2012, there were no long-term U.S. government securities held by the Funds.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 49
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
6. Investment Risks:
Foreign Securities Risk: Investments in foreign securities are generally considered riskier than investments in U.S. securities. Foreign securities, including those of emerging and frontier market issuers, are subject to additional risks, including international trade, political and regulatory risks.
Emerging Markets Risk: The prices of securities in emerging markets can fluctuate more significantly than the prices of companies in more developed countries. Securities of emerging market issuers generally have more risk than securities issued by issuers in more developed markets. The less developed the country, the greater affect the risks may have in an investment, and as a result, an investment may exhibit a higher degree of volatility than either the general domestic securities market or the securities markets of developed foreign countries.
Frontier Market Countries Risk: Frontier market countries generally have smaller economies and even less developed capital markets or legal and political systems than traditional emerging market countries. As a result, the risks of investing in emerging market countries are magnified in frontier market countries. The magnification of risks are the result of: the potential for extreme price volatility and illiquidity in frontier markets; government ownership or control of parts of private sector and of certain companies; trade barriers, exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which frontier market countries trade; and the relatively new and unsettled securities laws in many frontier market countries.
7. Federal Income Tax Information:
At April 30, 2012, the cost basis of securities for federal income tax purposes, gross unrealized appreciation, gross unrealized depreciation and net unrealized appreciation/depreciation were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Unrealized |
| | | | Tax Unrealized | | Tax Unrealized | | Appreciation/ |
Fund | | | Tax Cost($) | | Appreciation($) | | Depreciation($) | | (Depreciation)($) |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | 37,151,005 | | | 2,568,130 | | | | (156,988 | ) | | | | 2,411,142 | | |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | 26,163,349 | | | 292,112 | | | | (730,083 | ) | | | | (437,971 | ) | |
Frontier Markets Fund | | 14,917,540 | | | 1,684,073 | | | | (814,453 | ) | | | | 869,620 | | |
Total Return Fund | | 10,171,652 | | | 20,186 | | | | (28,934 | ) | | | | (8,748 | ) | |
____________________
* | | The difference between book-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales and the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains/losses on investments in passive foreign investment companies. |
The tax character of dividends paid by the Funds as of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011 was as follows:
| | Dividends paid from |
| | Ordinary | | Total Taxable | | Return of | | Total Dividends |
| | Income | | Dividends | | Capital | | Paid(1) |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | $ | 762,187 | | | $ | 762,187 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 762,187 | |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | | 228,762 | | | | 228,762 | | | | | 87,453 | | | | | 316,215 | |
Frontier Markets Fund | | | — | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
____________________
(1) | | Total dividends paid may differ from the amount reported in the Statement of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
50 HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS
Notes to Financial Statements — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) (continued)
As of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis for the Funds were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total |
| | Undistributed | | Undistributed | | Undistributed | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | Unrealized | | Accumulated |
| | Ordinary | | Tax Exempt | | Long Term | | Accumulated | | Dividends | | Capital and | | Appreciation/ | | Earnings/ |
| | Income | | Income | | Capital Gains | | Earnings | | Payable | | Other Losses | | (Depreciation) | | (Deficit) |
Emerging Markets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt Fund | | | $ | 229,958 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 229,958 | | | $ | (149,395 | ) | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 639,724 | | | | | $ | 720,287 | | |
Emerging Markets Local | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt Fund | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | (27,180 | ) | | | | — | | | | | | (1,074,511 | ) | | | | | (1,101,691 | ) | |
Frontier Markets Fund | | | | 29,080 | | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 29,080 | | | | — | | | | | (83,927 | ) | | | | | (433,703 | ) | | | | | (488,550 | ) | |
As of the latest tax year ended October 31, 2011, the following Funds have net capital loss carryforwards, which are available to offset future realized gains, if any, to the extent provided by the Treasury regulations. To the extent that these carryforwards are used to offset future capital gains, it is probable that the gains that are offset will not be distributed to shareholders.
| | Short-Term |
Fund | | | Amount |
Frontier Markets Fund | | $83,927 |
The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “RIC Modernization Act”) was signed into law on December 22, 2010. The RIC Modernization Act makes changes to several tax rules impacting the Funds. The provisions of the RIC Modernization Act were generally effective for each Fund’s tax period ending October 31, 2011. The RIC Modernization Act allows for capital losses originating in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 (“post-enactment capital losses”) to be carried forward indefinitely. Post-enactment capital losses will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term capital losses as under previous law.
The RIC Modernization Act also contains provisions which are intended to reduce the circumstances under which a regulated investment company would distribute amounts in excess of such income and gains or be required to file amended tax reporting information to its shareholders and the Internal Revenue Service. Information regarding any further effect of the RIC Modernization Act on the Funds, if any, will be contained within the “Federal Taxes” section of the financial statement notes for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2012.
8. Ownership and Principal Holders
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a Fund creates presumptions of control of the Fund, under section 2 (a)(9) of the 1940 Act. As of April 30, 2012, the Funds had individual shareholder accounts and/or omnibus shareholder accounts (comprised of a group of individual shareholders), each of which is affiliated with the Investment Adviser, and representing ownership in excess of 90% of each Fund, respectively.
9. Subsequent Events:
Management has evaluated events and transactions through the date the financial statements were available to be issued, for purposes of recognition or disclosure in these financial statements and there are no subsequent events to report.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS 51
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS |
|
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited) |
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), generally requires that a majority of the trustees of a mutual fund who are not parties to an investment advisory agreement for the fund or “interested persons” of the fund, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”) review and approve the investment advisory agreement at an in person meeting for an initial period of up to two years and thereafter on an annual basis. A summary of the material factors considered by the Independent Trustees and the Boards of Trustees (the “Board”) of HSBC Funds (formerly, HSBC Investor Funds), HSBC Advisor Funds Trust and HSBC Portfolios (formerly, HSBC Investor Portfolios) (each, a “Trust”) in connection with approving investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the series of the Trusts (each, a “Fund”) during the semi-annual period ended April 30, 2012 and the conclusions the Independent Trustees and Board made as a result of those considerations are set forth below.
I. Annual Continuation of Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements
The Board met in person on December 15-16, 2011 and the Contracts and Expense Committee thereof, which consists of the Independent Trustees of the Trusts (the “Contracts Committee”), met on November 29 and December 15, 2011 to consider, among other matters:
- the approval of the continuation of the: (i) Investment Advisory Contracts and related Supplements (“Advisory Contracts”) between the Trusts and HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. (the “Adviser”) and (ii) Sub-Advisory Agreements (“Sub-Advisory Contracts”) between the Adviser and each investment sub-adviser (“Sub-Adviser”) to one or more Funds; and
- the approval of the continuation of certain other ancillary agreements to which the Adviser is a party that obligate the Adviser to provide the Funds with administrative services, such as the Administration Agreement, Support Services Agreement and Operational Support Services Agreement (each, an “Ancillary Agreement”).
Prior to the meetings, the Independent Trustees received and reviewed the information they thought reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Advisory Contracts, Sub-Advisory Contracts and Ancillary Agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”). This information included, among other things, information about: (i) the services that the Adviser and Sub-Advisers provide; (ii) the personnel who provide such services; (iii) investment performance; (iv) trading practices of the Adviser and Sub-Advisers; (v) fees received or to be received by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, including in comparison with the advisory fees paid by other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vi) total expense ratios, including in comparison with the total expense ratios of other similar funds based on materials provided by Lipper Inc.; (vii) the profitability of the Adviser and certain of the Sub-Advisers; and (viii) compliance-related matters pertaining to the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. Counsel to the Trusts and to the Independent Trustees were present at each Contracts Committee meeting and the Board meeting. In this regard, counsel to the Independent Trustees advised the Independent Trustees with respect to their deliberations during the process and their fiduciary obligations under Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act.
On November 29, 2011, the Contracts Committee convened and its members reviewed the information provided in advance of the meeting and discussed, among other things: (i) the Administration Agreement; (ii) the Trusts’ arrangements with the Sub-Advisers and the Funds advised by the Sub-Advisers; (iii) the fees and performance record of the Funds that are money market funds (“Money Market Funds”); and (iv) compliance matters. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Committee requested certain additional information from the Adviser with respect to other accounts managed by the Adviser and pricing information regarding certain Funds, among other matters. The Contracts Committee also convened on December 15, 2011 to discuss, among other things: (i) the Adviser’s investment advisory arrangements with respect to the Aggressive Strategy Fund, Balanced Strategy Fund, Conservative Strategy Fund, and Moderate Strategy Fund (collectively, the “World Selection Funds”); (ii) the HSBC U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund (formerly, HSBC Investor U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund); (iii) certain subadvisory fee breakpoints; (iv) services provided to the Funds under the Ancillary Agreements; and (v) the Adviser’s response to the follow-up questions posed by the Contracts Committee following the November 29, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting. Following the December 15, 2011 Contracts Committee meeting, the members of the Contracts Committee determined to recommend to the Board, including the Independent Trustees, that the Agreements be continued for an additional one-year period.
At the in-person meeting held on December 15-16, 2011, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed the materials and other information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and considered the previous deliberations and recommendation of the Contracts Committee. As a result of this process, the Board and Independent Trustees determined to approve the continuation of the Agreements with respect to each Fund.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS |
|
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited) (continued) |
The Board and the Independent Trustees made these determinations on the basis of the following considerations, among others:
Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided by Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees examined the nature, quality and extent of the investment advisory and administrative support services provided by the Adviser to the Funds, as well as the quality and experience of the Adviser’s personnel. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Multimanager unit with respect to the World Selection Funds and the equity Funds, the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s Emerging Markets Debt Team with respect to the emerging markets debt Funds, as well as the capabilities and performance of the Adviser’s portfolio management and credit review teams with respect to the Money Market Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the nature, quality and extent of the administrative support services that the Adviser provides to the Funds, including the Adviser’s oversight and management of the Funds’ other service providers.
The Independent Trustees also took note of: (i) the long-term relationship between the Adviser and the Funds; (ii) the Adviser’s reputation and financial condition; (iii) the reduction during the period in the HSBC Family of Fund’s net assets; (iv) the liquidation of certain Funds; and (v) the efforts undertaken by the Adviser to foster the growth and development of the Funds since the inception of each of the Funds, including the recent development and launch of the HSBC Emerging Markets Debt Fund, HSBC Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund and HSBC Frontier Markets Fund. With respect to the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the financial support the Adviser and its affiliates have afforded the Money Market Funds, such as the fee waivers and reimbursements made to maintain a nonnegative yield for the Money Market Funds more recently. In addition, the Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s performance in fulfilling its responsibilities for overseeing its own and the Sub-Advisers’ compliance with the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures and investment objectives.
The Independent Trustees also examined the nature, quality and extent of the services that the Sub-Advisers provide to their respective Funds. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the investment performance and the portfolio risk characteristics achieved by the Sub-Advisers and the Sub-Advisers’ portfolio management teams, their experience, and the quality of their compliance programs, among other factors.
Based on these considerations, the Independent Trustees concluded that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers, and that the services provided supported continuance of the Agreements.
Investment Performance of the Funds, Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the investment performance of each Fund over various periods of time, as compared to one another as well as to comparable funds and one or more benchmark indices. In the context of the World Selection Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the relative underperformance of the World Selection Funds in light of data provided by Lipper Inc., and representations by the Adviser regarding market factors that contributed to the relative underperformance, as well as their investment outlook. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio (formerly, HSBC Investor Growth Portfolio), the Independent Trustees favorably noted the consistent performance record of the Portfolio. In the context of the Money Market Funds, the Independent Trustees considered the yield support that the Adviser had provided in order for the Money Market Funds to retain non-negative performance. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds’ investment performance and the Adviser’s actions to improve investment performance, where applicable, supported continuance of the Agreements.
Costs of Services and Profits Realized by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. The Independent Trustees considered the costs of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers and the expense ratios of the Funds more generally. The Independent Trustees considered the Adviser’s profitability and costs, including by means of an analysis provided by the Adviser of its estimated profitability attributable to its relationship with the Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts and compared those fees to the fees of similar funds, which had been compiled and provided by Lipper Inc. The Independent Trustees determined that the Funds had advisory fees competitive with those of similar funds, noting the resources, expertise and experience provided to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also compared the advisory fees under the Advisory Contracts with those of other accounts managed by the Adviser, and evaluated information provided as to why advisory fees may differ between mutual funds and other advisory relationships, including increased shareholder activity. In this regard, the Independent Trustees concluded that differences in advisory fees assessed between the Funds and other accounts managed by the Adviser did not preclude approval of the Advisory Contracts.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS |
|
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited) (continued) |
With respect to the administrative support services provided by the Adviser, the Independent Trustees considered the fees charged for such services and evaluated the fees payable to the Adviser and those payable to other providers of administrative services to the Funds.
The Independent Trustees also considered the costs of the services provided by the Sub-Advisers, as applicable; the relative portions of the total advisory fees paid to the Sub-Advisers and retained by the Adviser in its capacity as the Funds’ investment adviser; and the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers. In the context of the HSBC Growth Portfolio, the Independent Trustees considered the subadvisory fee breakpoint structure. The Independent Trustees also considered information on profitability where provided by the Sub-Advisers.
The Independent Trustees concluded that the advisory fees payable to the Adviser and the Funds’ Sub-Advisers were fair and reasonable in light of the factors set forth above.
Other Relevant Considerations. The Independent Trustees also considered the extent to which the Adviser and Sub-Advisers had achieved economies of scale, whether the Funds’ expense structure permits economies of scale to be shared with the Funds’ shareholders and, if so, the extent to which the Funds’ shareholders may benefit from these economies of scale. The Independent Trustees also noted the contractual caps on certain Fund expenses provided by the Adviser with respect to many of the Funds in order to reduce or control the overall operating expenses of those Funds. The Independent Trustees also considered certain information provided by the Adviser and Sub-Advisers with respect to the benefits they may derive from their relationships with the Funds, including the fact that certain Sub-Advisers have “soft dollar” arrangements with respect to Fund brokerage and therefore may have access to research and other permissible services.
In light of the above considerations and such other factors and information it considered relevant, the Board by a unanimous vote of those present in person at the meeting (including a separate unanimous vote of the Independent Trustees present in person at the meeting) approved the continuation of each Agreement.
III. Approval of an Advisory Contract Supplement for the HSBC Total Return Fund
On November 29, 2011, the Contracts Committee and the Board met in person to consider the expansion of the HSBC Family of Funds to include a new series of HSBC Funds, the HSBC Total Return Fund (“Total Return Fund”) and, in connection therewith, approving:
- the Advisory Contract between the Adviser and the Trust with respect to the Total Return Fund and the related Contract Supplement applicable to the Total Return Fund (“TR Advisory Agreement”); and
- the Trust’s Ancillary Agreements applicable to the Total Return Fund.
Prior to the meetings, the Independent Trustees received and reviewed the information they thought reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the TR Advisory Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements applicable to the Total Return Fund (collectively, the “TR Agreements”). This information included, among other things, information about: (i) the services the Adviser would provide to the Total Return Fund; (ii) personnel who provide such services; (iii) relevant past investment performance of the Adviser; and (iv) fees proposed to be received by the Adviser with respect to the Total Return Fund in comparison with other similar funds, based on materials provided by the Adviser from a database compiled by Lipper Inc. Counsel to the Trust and to the Independent Trustees were present at the Contracts Committee meeting and the Board meeting. In this regard, counsel to the Independent Trustees advised the Independent Trustees with respect to their deliberations during the process and their fiduciary obligations under Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act.
At its meeting, the Contracts Committee reviewed and discussed the information provided in advance of the meeting and received a presentation about the Adviser. Based on its deliberations, the Committee determined to recommend to the Board, including the Independent Trustees, that the TR Agreements be approved with respect to the Total Return Fund. At the meeting of the Board, the Independent Trustees considered the recommendation of the Contracts Committee and further evaluated the proposal. As a result of this process, the Board and Independent Trustees determined to approve the TR Agreements with respect to the Total Return Fund.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS |
|
Investment Advisor Contract Approval (Unaudited) (continued) |
The Board and the Independent Trustees made these determinations on the basis of the following considerations, among others:
Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided by the Adviser. The Independent Trustees examined the nature, quality and extent of the investment advisory services proposed to be provided by the Adviser with respect to the Total Return Fund, as well as the quality and experience of the Adviser’s personnel. In addition, the Independent Trustees considered that the services provided by the Adviser would be consistent with those provided to other Funds, and therefore considered the same points as they did in considering the annual renewal of the Advisory Contracts and Ancillary Agreements in December 2010. The Independent Trustees also considered the Adviser’s experience in emerging markets and its stature as one of the world’s leading managers of emerging market assets. The Independent Trustees noted the results achieved by the Adviser with respect to its emerging markets total return strategy, which has been implemented for non-registered products since 1999.
Based upon these considerations, the Independent Trustees concluded that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of the services proposed to be provided by the Adviser with respect to the Total Return Fund and that the services proposed to be provided supported the approval of the TR Advisory Agreement.
Investment Performance of the Adviser. The Independent Trustees considered performance information provided by the Adviser regarding its emerging markets total return strategy, including performance information for various periods. The Independent Trustees noted that this strategy is not a new business line for the Adviser as it has utilized this strategy with non-registered products for more than twelve years. The Independent Trustees concluded that the investment performance presented supported the initial approval of the TR Advisory Agreement.
Costs of Proposed Services and Profits to be Realized by the Adviser. The Independent Trustees considered the costs of the proposed services to be provided by the Adviser to the Total Return Fund. In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered information pertaining to the proposed advisory fees and the projected total expense ratios for the Total Return Fund as compared to other similar funds, based on materials provided by the Adviser from a database compiled by Lipper Inc. The Trustees noted that Lipper Inc. does not have a universe for “Emerging Markets Total Return Funds,” and therefore, the comparative information provided was for certain funds identified by the Adviser to be managed in a manner that is similar (but not the same as) the proposed Total Return Fund (the “HSBC Universe”). The Independent Trustees also reviewed the data provided by Lipper Inc. for the “Emerging Markets Debt Funds Universe.” The Independent Trustees found that the Total Return Fund’s proposed fees and expenses fell within the norm for the HSBC Universe. The Independent Trustees also considered the profitability information regarding the Adviser more generally that the Adviser has provided to the Independent Trustees in connection with the annual renewal of the 15(c) process. The Independent Trustees concluded that the advisory fees proposed to be payable to the Adviser are fair and reasonable in light of the factors set forth above.
Other Relevant Considerations. The Independent Trustees also considered the extent to which the Total Return Fund’s proposed expense structure may permit economies of scale to be shared with the Fund’s shareholders and, if so, the extent to which the Total Return Fund’s shareholders may benefit from these potential economies of scale. The Independent Trustees also noted the proposed contractual caps on certain Fund expenses proposed to be provided by the Adviser with respect to the Total Return Fund in order to reduce or control the overall operating expenses of the Fund. The Independent Trustees also considered the markets in which the Total Return Fund will invest and the Adviser’s outlook for emerging markets.
Accordingly, in light of the above considerations and such other factors and information it considered relevant, the Board of Trustees by a unanimous vote of those present in person at the meeting (including a separate unanimous vote of the Independent Trustees present in person at the meeting) approved the Total Return Agreements.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS |
|
Table of Shareholder Expenses — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) |
As a shareholder of the Funds, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases, redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare the cost with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012.
Actual Example
The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | Class A | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | | $ | 1,073.60 | | | | $ | 6.19 | | | | 1.20 | % | |
| Class I | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,074.10 | | | | | 4.38 | | | | 0.85 | % | |
| Class S | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,074.60 | | | | | 3.87 | | | | 0.75 | % | |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | Class A | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,027.10 | | | | | 6.05 | | | | 1.20 | % | |
| Class I | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,028.70 | | | | | 4.29 | | | | 0.85 | % | |
| Class S | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,029.10 | | | | | 3.78 | | | | 0.75 | % | |
Frontier Markets Fund | Class A | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,090.20 | | | | | 3.52 | | | | 2.20 | % | |
| Class I | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,091.20 | | | | | 2.96 | | | | 1.85 | % | |
Total Return Fund** | Class A | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,001.00 | | | | | 0.24 | | | | 0.28 | % | |
| Class I | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,001.10 | | | | | 0.19 | | | | 0.22 | % | |
| Class S | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,001.20 | | | | | 0.17 | | | | 0.20 | % | |
__________
* | | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
** | | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the period from March 30, 2012 (date of commencement of operations) to April 30, 2012 divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS |
|
Table of Shareholder Expenses — as of April 30, 2012 (Unaudited) |
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on each Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees, or exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized |
| | | | Beginning | | Ending | | Expenses Paid | | Expense Ratio |
| | | | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period* | | During Period |
| | | | 11/1/11 | | 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 | | 11/1/11 - 4/30/12 |
Emerging Markets Debt Fund | | Class A | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | | $ | 1,018.90 | | | | $6.02 | | | | 1.20 | % | |
| | Class I | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,020.64 | | | | 4.27 | | | | 0.85 | % | |
| | Class S | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,021.13 | | | | 3.77 | | | | 0.75 | % | |
Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | | Class A | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,018.90 | | | | 6.02 | | | | 1.20 | % | |
| | Class I | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,020.64 | | | | 4.27 | | | | 0.85 | % | |
| | Class S | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,021.13 | | | | 3.77 | | | | 0.75 | % | |
Frontier Markets Fund | | Class A | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,013.92 | | | | 11.02 | | | | 2.20 | % | |
| | Class I | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,015.66 | | | | 9.27 | | | | 1.85 | % | |
Total Return Fund** | | Class A | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,023.47 | | | | 1.41 | | | | 0.28 | % | |
| | Class I | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,023.77 | | | | 1.11 | | | | 0.22 | % | |
| | Class S | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,023.87 | | | | 1.01 | | | | 0.20 | % | |
____________________
* | | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). |
** | | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one half year period). Information shown reflects values using the expense ratios for the 32 days of operations during the period, and has been annualized to reflect values for the period November 1, 2011 to April 30, 2012. |
Other Information:
A description of the policies and procedures the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities of each Fund, and information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-525-5757 for HSBC Bank USA and HSBC Brokerage (USA) Inc. clients and 1-800-782-8183 for all other shareholders; (ii) on the Funds’ website at www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com; and (iii) on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“Commission”) website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Funds file their complete schedules of portfolio holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds’ Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Funds’ Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The Funds’ Schedules of Investments will be available no later than 60 days after each period end, without charge, on the Funds’ website at www.investorfunds.us.hsbc.com.
An investment in a Fund is not a deposit of HSBC Bank USA, N.A., and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.
HSBC FAMILY OF FUNDS: INVESTMENT ADVISER AND ADMINISTRATOR HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 SHAREHOLDER SERVICING AGENTS For HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. Clients: HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 1-888-525-5757 For All Other Shareholders: HSBC Funds P.O. Box 182845 Columbus, OH 43218 1-800-782-8183 TRANSFER AGENT Citi Fund Services 3435 Stelzer Road Columbus, OH 43219 DISTRIBUTOR Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. 690 Taylor Road, Suite 150 Gahanna, Ohio 43230 | CUSTODIAN The Northern Trust Company 50 South LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60603INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM KPMG LLP 191 West Nationwide Blvd., Suite 500 Columbus, OH 43215 LEGAL COUNSEL Dechert LLP 1775 I Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c424/4c4245f4924717d40aaef1320d6cfd18a2bdc81c" alt=""
The HSBC Family of Funds are distributed by Foreside Distribution Services, L.P. This document must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus for the HSBC Funds, which you should read carefully before you invest or send money.
— NOT FDIC INSURED | — NO BANK GUARANTEE | — MAY LOSE VALUE |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable – only for annual reports.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable – only for annual reports.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not applicable – only for annual reports.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Included as a part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that these disclosure controls and procedures are adequately designed and are operating effectively to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.
(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable – Only effective for annual reports.
(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) are attached hereto.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) are furnished herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Richard A. Fabietti | |
| Richard A. Fabietti |
| President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Richard A. Fabietti | |
| Richard A. Fabietti |
| President |
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Ty Edwards | |
| Ty Edwards |
| Treasurer |