We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund, covering the six-month period from October 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019. For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
The U.S. and many other developed economies continued their pattern of moderate growth during the six months. In October, equity markets experienced a sharp sell-off, stimulated in part by interest-rate increases, trade tensions and slowing global growth. The sell-off partially reduced prior gains on U.S. indices, while losses deepened in international developed and emerging markets. Global equities continued their general decline throughout the end of the calendar year. However, comments made in January by the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) that it might slow the pace of interest-rate increases in 2019 helped trigger a rebound across equity markets. In a similar vein, other central banks pledged to continue policies that support economic growth, helping to further ease investor concerns. Talk of a potential trade agreement between the U.S. and China also helped buoy equity markets, which continued their upward trajectory through the end of the period.
Equity volatility and global growth concerns triggered a flight to quality in many areas of the bond market, raising Treasury prices and flattening the yield curve through the end of 2018. Corporate bonds were also affected by growth and leverage concerns, causing reduced liquidity, increased spreads, and falling prices through the end of the calendar year. Bond markets rebounded in January after encouraging comments by the Fed, and many indices continued to experience positive returns throughout February and March.
We remain positive on the near-term economic outlook for the U.S. but will monitor relevant data for any signs of change.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE(Unaudited)
For the period from October 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019, as provided by John R. Porter, Todd W. Wakefield, CFA, and Robert C. Zeuthen, CFA, of Mellon Investments Corporation, Sub-Investment Adviser
Market and Fund Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended March 31, 2019, Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of -2.57%, Class C shares returned -2.91%, Class I shares returned -2.48%, Class Y shares returned -2.42%, and Class Z shares returned -2.44.1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Russell 2500™ Growth Index (the “Index”), posted a total return of -4.90% for the same period.2
Small- and mid-cap growth stocks provided negative returns over the reporting period, resulting from market volatility in the fourth quarter of 2018, fueled by geopolitical, trade, and economic uncertainty. The fund outperformed the Index, mainly due to successful security selections in the information technology, consumer discretionary, and industrials sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks long-term growth of capital. To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in equity securities of small-cap and mid-cap U.S. companies (those with market capitalizations equal to or less than the total market capitalization of the largest company in the Index). We employ a growth-oriented investment style in managing the fund’s portfolio. This means we seek to identify those small-cap and mid-cap companies that are experiencing, or are expected to experience, rapid earnings or revenue growth. We focus on high-quality companies and individual stock selection, instead of trying to predict which industries or sectors will perform best, and select stocks by:
· Using fundamental research to identify and follow companies considered to have attractive characteristics, such as strong business and competitive positions, solid cash flows and balance sheets, high-quality management, and high sustainable growth;
· Investing in a company when the portfolio managers’ research indicates that the company will experience accelerating revenues and expanding operating margins, which may lead to rising estimate trends and favorable earnings surprises.
The fund’s investment strategy may lead it to emphasize certain industries, such as technology, health care, business services, and communications.
A Tale of Two Markets
Markets delivered two drastically different periods of behavior over the six months but lost ground over the reporting period as a whole. Through early fall, many equity markets felt pressure from slowing global growth, escalating trade issues between the U.S. and China, Brexit difficulties, and additional geopolitical issues elsewhere in Europe and the emerging markets. Volatility picked up in October, when renewed articulation of hawkish narratives by U.S. Federal Reserve (“Fed”) officials alarmed investors. In December, equities reached new
3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE(Unaudited) (continued)
lows for the year, as economic and political news continued to unnerve investors. Investors also feared the European Central Bank (ECB) would proceed with its plan to conclude stimulus measures in January, despite moderating growth rates.
January marked a turnaround in markets. Talk of a potential trade deal between the U.S. and China helped fuel investor optimism, as equity prices recovered. Furthermore, the ECB announced it would provide additional stimulus to support the Eurozone economy. At its first meeting of the year, the Fed emphasized its focus on data as a primary driver for rate-hike decisions, and its ability to suspend additional rate increases when the data is not supportive. These sentiments reassured investors of central bankers’ commitments to support flagging growth. The rebound continued throughout the month of January, and many equities maintained an upward trajectory during the months of February and March.
Based on the Russell family of indices, mid-cap stocks outperformed their large- and small-cap counterparts in this environment. Growth outperformed value across all market capitalizations.
Security Selections Bolstered Fund Performance
The fund fared relatively well in the information technology sector, where IT services and software were strong performers. Information services provider Twilio benefited from strong results within its core business and improving margins. IT services company Shopify, a provider of website services and payment systems for e-commerce sites, performed well on strong trends in online shopping. Marketing-and-sales software platform HubSpot saw continued growth in marketing solutions and was another top contributor to relative returns. In the consumer discretionary sector, hotels, restaurants, and leisure positioning was most beneficial. Fitness center operator Planet Fitness performed well on strong earnings and an increase in same-store sales. Chipotle Mexican Grill also saw its stock price increase during the period on optimism resulting from its new leadership team and improving marketing loyalty program, which are producing results. CoStar Group, a professional services company in the industrials sector, was also among the top contributors to relative returns.
Conversely, stock selections within the health care sector were a main detractor from results, particularly within the health care equipment and supplies industry. ABIOMED was among the worst-performing positions. Its stock price was hampered during the reporting period over revenue growth concerns, fueled by lower-than-expected adoption rates for its flagship product, a heart pump. Align Technology, the manufacturer of the Invisalign tooth-straightening product, also suffered during the period. A position inLigand Pharmaceuticals was another top detractor. Fresh investor concern over the company’s royalty-based revenue model depressed the stock price. We have since closed the position. Within the materials sector, a position inCarpenter Technology weighed on results. The stock fell following a fiscal first-quarter earnings miss. We have since exited the stock, due to a lack of near-term catalysts for improvement.
Finding Opportunities Amid Volatility
While we expect that the first-quarter market strength may continue in the near term, we remain attentive to indications that may signal change on the horizon. Global growth is slowing but remains positive. Inflationary signals have also calmed. We believe a slowly growing economy, with inflation held in check, can lead to growth in equity markets. The
4
Fed has also indicated a possible pause in interest-rate increases, which we think can also have positive implications for equity market returns. We are positive on U.S. equities and have continued to identify what we believe are attractive investment opportunities in the current environment. Moreover, we continue to believe that market volatility may present opportunities to purchase the stocks of fundamentally strong companies at more attractive prices.
April 15, 2019
1 Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid and does not take into consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares, or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge imposed on redemptions in the case of Class C shares. Had these charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost.
2 Source: Lipper Inc. — The Russell 2500™ Growth Index measures the performance of the small- to mid-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 2500 companies with higher growth earning potential as defined by Russell’s leading style methodology. The Russell 2500™ Growth Index is constructed to provide a comprehensive and unbiased barometer of the small- to mid-cap growth market. The index is completely reconstituted annually to ensure larger stocks do not distort the performance and characteristics of the true small- to mid-cap opportunity set and that the represented companies continue to reflect growth characteristics. Investors cannot invest directly in any index.
Please note: the position in any security highlighted with italicized typeface was sold during the reporting period.
Equities are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer, and investment style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the fund’s prospectus.
Small and midsized companies carry additional risks because their earnings and revenues tend to be less predictable, and their share prices more volatile, than those of larger, more established companies.
5
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES(Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund from October 1, 2018 to March 31, 2019. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended March 31, 2019 |
| | Class A | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Y | | Class Z |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | | $4.82 | | $8.55 | | $3.69 | | $3.10 | | $3.74 |
Ending value (after expenses) | | $974.30 | | $970.90 | | $975.20 | | $975.80 | | $975.60 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS(Unaudited)
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended March 31, 2019 |
| | Class A | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Y | | Class Z |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | | $4.94 | | $8.75 | | $3.78 | | $3.18 | | $3.83 |
Ending value (after expenses) | | $1,020.04 | | $1,016.26 | | $1,021.19 | | $1,021.79 | | $1,021.14 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .98% for Class A, 1.74% for Class C, .75% for Class I, .63% for Class Y and .76% for Class Z, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2019 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | |
|
Description | | | | Shares | | Value ($) | |
Common Stocks - 94.7% | | | | | |
Banks - 3.6% | | | | | |
First Republic Bank | | | | 233,812 | a | 23,488,754 | |
Signature Bank | | | | 182,076 | | 23,318,473 | |
SVB Financial Group | | | | 68,047 | b | 15,130,931 | |
Webster Financial | | | | 228,456 | | 11,575,866 | |
| | | | 73,514,024 | |
Capital Goods - 9.2% | | | | | |
Allegion | | | | 193,546 | a | 17,556,558 | |
Curtiss-Wright | | | | 205,311 | | 23,269,949 | |
Graco | | | | 194,010 | | 9,607,375 | |
Mercury Systems | | | | 590,246 | a,b | 37,822,964 | |
Quanta Services | | | | 454,705 | | 17,160,567 | |
Rexnord | | | | 1,047,207 | b | 26,326,784 | |
SiteOne Landscape Supply | | | | 286,034 | b | 16,346,843 | |
Welbilt | | | | 736,621 | a,b | 12,065,852 | |
Xylem | | | | 374,234 | | 29,579,455 | |
| | | | 189,736,347 | |
Commercial & Professional Services - 1.5% | | | | | |
CoStar Group | | | | 66,501 | b | 31,017,396 | |
Consumer Durables & Apparel - 2.4% | | | | | |
Lululemon Athletica | | | | 302,722 | b | 49,607,054 | |
Consumer Services - 5.3% | | | | | |
Chipotle Mexican Grill | | | | 31,229 | b | 22,182,271 | |
Planet Fitness, Cl. A | | | | 1,015,931 | b | 69,814,778 | |
Six Flags Entertainment | | | | 369,555 | | 18,237,539 | |
| | | | 110,234,588 | |
Diversified Financials - .7% | | | | | |
Focus Financial Partners, Cl. A | | | | 127,676 | | 4,550,373 | |
LPL Financial Holdings | | | | 141,860 | | 9,880,549 | |
| | | | 14,430,922 | |
Energy - 1.4% | | | | | |
Cactus, Cl. A | | | | 331,558 | b | 11,803,465 | |
Parsley Energy, Cl. A | | | | 843,440 | b | 16,278,392 | |
| | | | 28,081,857 | |
Health Care Equipment & Services - 10.5% | | | | | |
ABIOMED | | | | 117,821 | b | 33,648,499 | |
Align Technology | | | | 75,195 | b | 21,380,194 | |
Dexcom | | | | 279,833 | b | 33,328,110 | |
HealthEquity | | | | 201,610 | a,b | 14,915,108 | |
Insulet | | | | 178,966 | a,b | 17,017,877 | |
Medidata Solutions | | | | 322,948 | a,b | 23,652,711 | |
Nevro | | | | 208,413 | b | 13,027,897 | |
7
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | |
|
Description | | | | Shares | | Value ($) | |
Common Stocks - 94.7% (continued) | | | | | |
Health Care Equipment & Services - 10.5% (continued) | | | | | |
Teladoc Health | | | | 627,431 | a,b | 34,885,164 | |
WellCare Health Plans | | | | 95,039 | b | 25,636,770 | |
| | | | 217,492,330 | |
Materials - 2.0% | | | | | |
AptarGroup | | | | 297,374 | | 31,637,620 | |
Summit Materials, Cl. A | | | | 551,613 | b | 8,754,098 | |
| | | | 40,391,718 | |
Media & Entertainment - 1.0% | | | | | |
Liberty Media Corp-Liberty Formula One, Cl. C | | | | 591,772 | b | 20,741,609 | |
Pharmaceuticals Biotechnology & Life Sciences - 9.8% | | | | | |
Acceleron Pharma | | | | 190,659 | a,b | 8,878,990 | |
Aerie Pharmaceuticals | | | | 281,783 | a,b | 13,384,692 | |
Amicus Therapeutics | | | | 815,533 | b | 11,091,249 | |
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals | | | | 247,523 | a,b | 2,014,837 | |
BioMarin Pharmaceutical | | | | 143,969 | a,b | 12,788,766 | |
Cambrex | | | | 319,214 | a,b | 12,401,464 | |
FibroGen | | | | 336,968 | a,b | 18,314,211 | |
Galapagos, ADR | | | | 146,707 | a,b | 17,279,150 | |
Global Blood Therapeutics | | | | 214,601 | a,b | 11,358,831 | |
GW Pharmaceuticals, ADR | | | | 84,005 | b | 14,160,723 | |
Myovant Sciences | | | | 252,349 | b | 6,023,571 | |
Neurocrine Biosciences | | | | 165,108 | b | 14,546,015 | |
REGENXBIO | | | | 82,147 | a,b | 4,707,845 | |
SAGE Therapeutics | | | | 131,426 | a,b | 20,903,305 | |
Sarepta Therapeutics | | | | 188,800 | a,b | 22,503,072 | |
Zogenix | | | | 231,110 | a,b | 12,713,361 | |
| | | | 203,070,082 | |
Retailing - 4.3% | | | | | |
Carvana | | | | 616,369 | a,b | 35,786,384 | |
National Vision Holdings | | | | 973,197 | b | 30,587,582 | |
Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings | | | | 271,329 | a,b | 23,152,504 | |
| | | | 89,526,470 | |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 1.8% | | | | | |
Power Integrations | | | | 237,300 | | 16,596,762 | |
Semtech | | | | 404,332 | b | 20,584,542 | |
| | | | 37,181,304 | |
Software & Services - 32.0% | | | | | |
2U | | | | 617,888 | a,b | 43,777,365 | |
Black Knight | | | | 506,406 | b | 27,599,127 | |
CACI International, Cl. A | | | | 175,842 | b | 32,006,761 | |
DocuSign | | | | 635,376 | a | 32,937,892 | |
Everbridge | | | | 263,449 | b | 19,761,309 | |
8
| | | | | | | |
|
Description | | | | Shares | | Value ($) | |
Common Stocks - 94.7% (continued) | | | | | |
Software & Services - 32.0% (continued) | | | | | |
HubSpot | | | | 383,542 | b | 63,748,516 | |
LogMeIn | | | | 425,237 | | 34,061,484 | |
New Relic | | | | 130,480 | b | 12,878,376 | |
Proofpoint | | | | 260,164 | b | 31,591,714 | |
Rapid7 | | | | 916,163 | b | 46,367,009 | |
Shopify, Cl. A | | | | 279,792 | b | 57,810,623 | |
Splunk | | | | 395,388 | b | 49,265,345 | |
Square, Cl. A | | | | 624,375 | a,b | 46,778,175 | |
SS&C Technologies Holdings | | | | 659,534 | | 42,005,720 | |
Twilio, Cl. A | | | | 662,006 | a,b | 85,517,935 | |
Zendesk | | | | 386,611 | b | 32,861,935 | |
| | | | 658,969,286 | |
Technology Hardware & Equipment - 5.2% | | | | | |
FLIR Systems | | | | 424,363 | | 20,191,192 | |
Littelfuse | | | | 75,709 | a | 13,815,378 | |
Lumentum Holdings | | | | 327,826 | a,b | 18,535,282 | |
NETGEAR | | | | 269,223 | a,b | 8,916,666 | |
nLight | | | | 729,636 | | 16,256,290 | |
Trimble | | | | 252,979 | b | 10,220,352 | |
Zebra Technologies, Cl. A | | | | 88,153 | b | 18,470,698 | |
| | | | 106,405,858 | |
Telecommunication Services - 2.2% | | | | | |
Bandwidth, Cl. A | | | | 671,264 | b | 44,947,837 | |
Transportation - 1.8% | | | | | |
J.B. Hunt Transport Services | | | | 167,430 | | 16,958,985 | |
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings | | | | 600,679 | a | 19,630,190 | |
| | | | 36,589,175 | |
Total Common Stocks(cost $1,376,338,392) | | | | 1,951,937,857 | |
| | | | | | | |
Exchange-Traded Funds - 1.5% | | | | | |
Registered Investment Companies - 1.5% | | | | | |
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (cost $30,788,601) | | | | 155,696 | a | 30,619,175 | |
| | 1-Day Yield (%) | | | | | |
Investment Companies - 4.1% | | | | | |
Registered Investment Companies - 4.1% | | | | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Plus Money Market Fund (cost $84,481,107) | | 2.46 | | 84,481,107 | c | 84,481,107 | |
9
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | |
|
Description | | 1-Day Yield (%) | | Shares | | Value ($) | |
Investment of Cash Collateral for Securities Loaned - 3.2% | | | | | |
Registered Investment Companies - 3.2% | | | | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Plus Money Market Fund (cost $65,282,164) | | 2.46 | | 65,282,164 | c | 65,282,164 | |
Total Investments(cost $1,556,890,264) | | 103.5% | | 2,132,320,303 | |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | | (3.5%) | | (71,967,973) | |
Net Assets | | 100.0% | | 2,060,352,330 | |
ADR—American Depository Receipt
ETF—Exchange-Traded Fund
a Security, or portion thereof, on loan. At March 31, 2019, the value of the fund’s securities on loan was $403,408,249 and the value of the collateral held by the fund was $406,435,578, consisting of cash collateral of $65,282,164 and U.S. Government & Agency securities valued at $341,153,414.
b Non-income producing security.
c Investment in affiliated issuer. The investment objective of this investment company is publicly available and can be found within the investment company’s prospectus.
| |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | Value (%) |
Information Technology | 38.9 |
Health Care | 20.3 |
Industrials | 12.5 |
Consumer Discretionary | 12.1 |
Investment Companies | 8.8 |
Financials | 4.3 |
Communication Services | 3.2 |
Materials | 2.0 |
Energy | 1.4 |
| 103.5 |
† Based on net assets.
See notes to financial statements.
10
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATED ISSUERS(Unaudited)
| | | | | | |
Investment Companies | Value 9/30/18($) | Purchases($) | Sales ($) | Value 3/31/19($) | Net Assets(%) | Dividends/ Distributions($) |
Registered Investment Companies; | | | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Plus Money Market Fund | 68,607,829 | 325,975,612 | 310,102,334 | 84,481,107 | 4.1 | 568,105 |
Investment of Cash Collateral for Securities Loaned;† | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Money Market Fund, Institutional Shares | 110,326,927 | 208,404,801 | 318,731,728 | - | - | - |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Plus Money Market Fund | - | 184,049,184 | 118,767,020 | 65,282,164 | 3.2 | - |
Total | 178,934,756 | 718,429,597 | 747,601,082 | 149,763,271 | 7.3 | 568,105 |
† Effective January 2, 2019, cash collateral for securities lending was transferred from Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Money Market Fund, Institutional Shares to Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Plus Money Market Fund.
See notes to financial statements.
11
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
March 31, 2019 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | Cost | | Value | |
Assets ($): | | | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments (including securities on loan, valued at $403,408,249)—Note 1(b): | | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | 1,407,126,993 | | 1,982,557,032 | |
Affiliated issuers | | 149,763,271 | | 149,763,271 | |
Receivable for investment securities sold | | 8,762,109 | |
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | | 4,058,741 | |
Dividends, interest and securities lending income receivable | | 438,999 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | | | 147,580 | |
| | | | | 2,145,727,732 | |
Liabilities ($): | | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | | 1,214,639 | |
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(b) | | 65,282,164 | |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | 17,306,950 | |
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | | 1,292,367 | |
Trustees fees and expenses payable | | 4,686 | |
Accrued expenses | | | | | 274,596 | |
| | | | | 85,375,402 | |
Net Assets ($) | | | 2,060,352,330 | |
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | | | 1,527,332,175 | |
Total distributable earnings (loss) | | | | | 533,020,155 | |
Net Assets ($) | | | 2,060,352,330 | |
| | | | | | |
Net Asset Value Per Share | Class A | Class C | Class I | Class Y | Class Z | |
Net Assets ($) | 335,245,602 | 60,728,811 | 1,323,462,713 | 224,042,939 | 116,872,265 | |
Shares Outstanding | 15,477,281 | 3,201,618 | 58,790,918 | 9,886,802 | 5,195,371 | |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 21.66 | 18.97 | 22.51 | 22.66 | 22.50 | |
| | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | | | |
12
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Investment Income ($): | | | | |
Income: | | | | |
Cash dividends (net of $735 foreign taxes withheld at source): | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | | 3,069,179 | |
Affiliated issuers | | | 568,105 | |
Income from securities lending—Note 1(b) | | | 310,910 | |
Interest | | | 621 | |
Total Income | | | 3,948,815 | |
Expenses: | | | | |
Investment advisory fee—Note 3(a) | | | 5,362,096 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | | | 1,228,188 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | | | 250,694 | |
Registration fees | | | 100,487 | |
Administration fee—Note 3(a) | | | 77,804 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | | | 61,911 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | | | 38,052 | |
Professional fees | | | 28,037 | |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | | | 27,400 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | | | 22,256 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 9,676 | |
Total Expenses | | | 7,206,601 | |
Investment (Loss)—Net | | | (3,257,786) | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (36,912,544) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | | | 1,136,226 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | | | (35,776,318) | |
Net (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | | (39,034,104) | |
| | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | | |
13
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | Year Ended September 30, 2018 | a |
Operations ($): | | | | | | | | |
Investment (loss)—net | | | (3,257,786) | | | | (5,166,766) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | (36,912,544) | | | | 155,240,858 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | | 1,136,226 | | | | 269,088,034 | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (39,034,104) | | | | 419,162,126 | |
Distributions ($): | |
Distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (22,139,233) | | | | (20,191,319) | |
Class C | | | (4,757,737) | | | | (3,716,718) | |
Class I | | | (79,415,710) | | | | (43,026,990) | |
Class Y | | | (14,023,110) | | | | (37,073,349) | |
Class Z | | | (7,752,625) | | | | - | |
Total Distributions | | | (128,088,415) | | | | (104,008,376) | |
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 38,583,787 | | | | 58,858,997 | |
Class C | | | 9,581,697 | | | | 20,441,349 | |
Class I | | | 308,697,829 | | | | 669,950,295 | |
Class Y | | | 23,585,111 | | | | 48,976,186 | |
Class Z | | | 1,073,514 | | | | 1,830,164 | |
Net assets received in connection with reorganization—Note 1 | | - | | | | 148,628,433 | |
Distributions reinvested: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 20,879,228 | | | | 18,783,727 | |
Class C | | | 4,721,634 | | | | 3,704,138 | |
Class I | | | 78,772,622 | | | | 42,423,586 | |
Class Y | | | 14,023,110 | | | | 37,073,350 | |
Class Z | | | 7,215,382 | | | | - | |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (32,611,172) | | | | (44,664,930) | |
Class C | | | (8,630,544) | | | | (12,211,325) | |
Class I | | | (173,145,854) | | | | (201,679,655) | |
Class Y | | | (15,694,266) | | | | (328,452,636) | |
Class Z | | | (3,729,148) | | | | (5,746,506) | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Beneficial Interest Transactions | 273,322,930 | | | | 457,915,173 | |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 106,200,411 | | | | 773,068,923 | |
Net Assets ($): | |
Beginning of Period | | | 1,954,151,919 | | | | 1,181,082,996 | |
End of Period | | | 2,060,352,330 | | | | 1,954,151,919 | |
14
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | Year Ended September 30, 2018 | a |
Capital Share Transactions (Shares): | |
Class Ab,c | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 1,916,278 | | | | 2,705,141 | |
Shares issued in connection with reorganization—Note 1 | - | | | | 1,221,094 | |
Shares issued for distributions reinvested | | | 1,057,716 | | | | 994,374 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (1,656,015) | | | | (2,104,634) | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 1,317,979 | | | | 2,815,975 | |
Class Cb | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 530,148 | | | | 1,032,531 | |
Shares issued in connection with reorganization—Note 1 | - | | | | 221,479 | |
Shares issued for distributions reinvested | | | 272,462 | | | | 219,440 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (514,780) | | | | (660,156) | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 287,830 | | | | 813,294 | |
Class Ic | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 14,868,135 | | | | 30,617,406 | |
Shares issued in connection with reorganization—Note 1 | - | | | | 598,312 | |
Shares issued for distributions reinvested | | | 3,842,674 | | | | 2,173,340 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (8,523,666) | | | | (9,109,064) | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 10,187,143 | | | | 24,279,994 | |
Class Y | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 1,112,417 | | | | 2,206,873 | |
Shares issued for distributions reinvested | | | 679,744 | | | | 1,889,569 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (750,278) | | | | (15,707,397) | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 1,041,883 | | | | (11,610,955) | |
Class Zc | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 49,037 | | | | 78,361 | |
Shares issued in connection with reorganization—Note 1 | - | | | | 5,152,212 | |
Shares issued for distributions reinvested | | | 352,141 | | | | - | |
Shares redeemed | | | (178,632) | | | | (257,748) | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 222,546 | | | | 4,972,825 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
aOn January 19, 2018, the fund commenced offering Class Z shares. | |
bDuring the period ended March 31, 2019, 991 Class C shares representing $18,470 were automatically converted to 877 Class A shares and during the period ended September 30, 2018, 3,095 Class C shares representing $54,486 were automatically converted to 2,762 Class A shares. | |
cDuring the period ended September 30, 2018, 1,431 Class A shares representing $29,922 were exchanged for 1,384 Class Z shares and 436 Class Z shares representing $10,410 were exchanged for 436 Class I shares. | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | | | | | |
15
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following tables describe the performance for each share class for the fiscal periods indicated. All information (except portfolio turnover rate) reflects financial results for a single fund share. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions. These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
| | | | | | | | |
| |
| Six Months Ended | |
| March 31, 2019 | Year Ended September 30, |
Class A Shares | (Unaudited) | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | 24.00 | 19.87 | 16.66 | 15.83 | 17.65 | 18.76 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment (loss)—neta | (.05) | (.11) | (.04) | (.06) | (.07) | (.09) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (.72) | 6.05 | 3.63 | 1.92 | .06 | 1.08 |
Total from Investment Operations | (.77) | 5.94 | 3.59 | 1.86 | (.01) | .99 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from net realized gain on investments | (1.57) | (1.81) | (.38) | (1.03) | (1.81) | (2.10) |
Net asset value, end of period | 21.66 | 24.00 | 19.87 | 16.66 | 15.83 | 17.65 |
Total Return (%)b | (2.57)c | 32.33 | 21.95 | 12.11 | (.42) | 5.59 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | .98d | 1.00 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.04 |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | .98d | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.04 |
Ratio of net investment (loss) to average net assets | (.54)d | (.53) | (.20) | (.41) | (.42) | (.48) |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 29.61c | 56.70 | 67.52 | 120.54 | 144.39 | 139.37 |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 335,246 | 339,848 | 225,374 | 222,978 | 219,185 | 225,427 |
a Based on average shares outstanding.
b Exclusive of sales charge.
c Not annualized.
d Annualized.
See notes to financial statements.
16
| | | | | | | |
| |
| Six Months Ended | |
| March 31, 2019 | Year Ended September 30, |
Class C Shares | (Unaudited) | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | 21.31 | 17.96 | 15.20 | 14.64 | 16.58 | 17.87 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment (loss)—neta | (.12) | (.24) | (.16) | (.17) | (.20) | (.22) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (.65) | 5.40 | 3.30 | 1.76 | .07 | 1.03 |
Total from Investment Operations | (.77) | 5.16 | 3.14 | 1.59 | (.13) | .81 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from net realized gain on investments | (1.57) | (1.81) | (.38) | (1.03) | (1.81) | (2.10) |
Net asset value, end of period | 18.97 | 21.31 | 17.96 | 15.20 | 14.64 | 16.58 |
Total Return (%)b | (2.91)c | 31.34 | 21.00 | 11.28 | (1.18) | 4.72 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 1.74d | 1.73 | 1.79 | 1.83 | 1.81 | 1.83 |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.74d | 1.73 | 1.79 | 1.83 | 1.81 | 1.83 |
Ratio of net investment (loss) to average net assets | (1.30)d | (1.27) | (.97) | (1.19) | (1.21) | (1.26) |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 29.61c | 56.70 | 67.52 | 120.54 | 144.39 | 139.37 |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 60,729 | 62,107 | 37,725 | 33,779 | 34,554 | 31,329 |
a Based on average shares outstanding.
b Exclusive of sales charge.
c Not annualized.
d Annualized.
See notes to financial statements.
17
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | | | | | | | |
| |
| Six Months Ended | |
| March 31, 2019 | Year Ended September 30, |
Class I Shares | (Unaudited) | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | 24.85 | 20.46 | 17.09 | 16.18 | 17.96 | 19.01 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income (loss)—neta | (.03) | (.07) | .02 | (.03) | (.03) | (.04) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (.74) | 6.27 | 3.73 | 1.97 | .06 | 1.09 |
Total from Investment Operations | (.77) | 6.20 | 3.75 | 1.94 | .03 | 1.05 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from net realized gain on investments | (1.57) | (1.81) | (.38) | (1.03) | (1.81) | (2.10) |
Net asset value, end of period | 22.51 | 24.85 | 20.46 | 17.09 | 16.18 | 17.96 |
Total Return (%) | (2.48)b | 32.69 | 22.34 | 12.36 | (.17) | 5.85 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | .75c | .74 | .75 | .79 | .79 | .80 |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | .75c | .74 | .75 | .79 | .79 | .80 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets | (.31)c | (.29) | .10 | (.16) | (.19) | (.24) |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 29.61b | 56.70 | 67.52 | 120.54 | 144.39 | 139.37 |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 1,323,463 | 1,207,703 | 497,604 | 511,768 | 512,830 | 605,932 |
a Based on average shares outstanding.
b Not annualized.
c Annualized.
See notes to financial statements.
18
| | | | | | | |
| |
| Six Months Ended | | |
| March 31, 2019 | Year Ended September 30, |
Class Y Shares | (Unaudited) | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | 24.99 | 20.55 | 17.15 | 16.21 | 17.97 | 19.01 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income (loss)—neta | (.02) | (.03) | .01 | (.00)b | (.01) | (.03) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (.74) | 6.28 | 3.77 | 1.97 | .06 | 1.09 |
Total from Investment Operations | (.76) | 6.25 | 3.78 | 1.97 | .05 | 1.06 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from net realized gain on investments | (1.57) | (1.81) | (.38) | (1.03) | (1.81) | (2.10) |
Net asset value, end of period | 22.66 | 24.99 | 20.55 | 17.15 | 16.21 | 17.97 |
Total Return (%) | (2.42)c | 32.79 | 22.44 | 12.53 | (.05) | 5.90 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | .63d | .65 | .68 | .68 | .68 | .72 |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | .63d | .65 | .68 | .68 | .68 | .72 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets | (.19)d | (.16) | .05 | (.03) | (.07) | (.15) |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 29.61c | 56.70 | 67.52 | 120.54 | 144.39 | 139.37 |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 224,043 | 221,008 | 420,380 | 117,953 | 104,961 | 100,902 |
a Based on average shares outstanding.
b Amount represents less than $.01 per share.
c Not annualized.
d Annualized.
See notes to financial statements.
19
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | | | | | | | |
| |
| Six Months Ended | | |
| March 31, 2019 | Year Ended |
Class Z Shares | (Unaudited) | | | | | September 30, 2018a |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | 24.83 | | | | | 20.86 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment (loss)—netb | (.03) | | | | | (.07) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (.73) | | | | | 4.04 |
Total from Investment Operations | (.76) | | | | | 3.97 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from net realized gain on investments | (1.57) | | | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | 22.50 | | | | | 24.83 |
Total Return (%)c | (2.44) | | | | | 19.03 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assetsd | .76 | | | | | .84 |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assetsd | .76 | | | | | .84 |
Ratio of net investment (loss) to average net assetsd | (.32) | | | | | (.42) |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 29.61c | | | | | 56.70 |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 116,872 | | | | | 123,486 |
a From January 19, 2018, (commencement of initial offering) to September 30, 2018.
b Based on average shares outstanding.
c Not annualized.
d Annualized.
See notes to financial statements.
20
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (the “fund”) is a separate non-diversified series of Dreyfus Investment Funds (the “Trust”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering seven series, including the fund. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term growth of capital. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Adviser” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. Effective January 2, 2019, BNY Mellon Asset Management North America Corporation was renamed Mellon Investments Corporation (the “Sub adviser”). Mellon Investments Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of the Adviser, serves as the fund’s sub-investment adviser.
As of the close of business on January 19, 2018, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization previously approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) and the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board of Dreyfus Funds, Inc.”), all of the assets, subject to the liabilities, of Dreyfus Funds, Inc., Dreyfus Mid-Cap Growth Fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class F shares were transferred to the fund in a tax free exchange for Class A, Class C, Class I and Class Z shares of Beneficial Interest of equal value. The purpose of the transaction was to combine two funds with comparable investment objectives and strategies. Shareholders of Dreyfus Funds, Inc., Dreyfus Mid-Cap Growth Fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class F shares received Class A, Class C, Class I and Class Z shares of the fund, respectively, in an amount equal to the aggregate net asset value of their investment in Dreyfus Funds, Inc., Dreyfus Mid-Cap Growth Fund’s Class A, Class C Class I and Class F shares at the time of the exchange. The net asset value of the fund’s shares on the close of business on January 19, 2018, after the reorganization was $20.19 for Class A, $18.02 for Class C, $20.86 for Class I and $20.86 for Class Z, and a total of 1,221,094 Class A, 221,479 Class C, 598,312 Class I and 5,152,212 Class Z shares were issued to shareholders of Dreyfus Funds, Inc., Dreyfus Mid-Cap Growth Fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class F shares, respectively in the exchange.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, is the distributor of the fund’s shares. The fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class C, Class I, Class T, Class Y and Class Z. Class A, Class C and Class T shares are sold primarily to retail investors through financial intermediaries
21
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)(continued)
and bear Distribution and/or Shareholder Services Plan fees. Class A and Class T shares generally are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class C shares automatically convert to Class A shares ten years after the date of purchase, without the imposition of a sales charge. Class I shares are sold primarily to bank trust departments and other financial service providers (including The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of the Adviser, and its affiliates), acting on behalf of customers having a qualified trust or an investment account or relationship at such institution, and bear no Distribution or Shareholder Services Plan fees. Class Y shares are sold at net asset value per share generally to institutional investors, and bear no Distribution or Shareholder Services Plan fees. Class I and Class Y shares are offered without a front-end sales charge or CDSC. Class Z shares are sold at net asset value per share generally to certain shareholders of the fund. Class Z shares generally are not available for new accounts. As of the date of this report, the fund did not offer Class T shares for purchase. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs, and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The Trust accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
22
This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. Valuation techniques used to value the fund’s investments are as follows:
Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. For open short positions, asked prices are used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value. All of the preceding securities are generally categorized within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices. These securities are generally categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
23
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)(continued)
Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant American Depository Receipts and futures. Utilizing these techniques may result in transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to accurately reflect fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board. Certain factors may be considered when fair valuing investments such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. These securities are either categorized within Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy depending on the relevant inputs used.
For restricted securities where observable inputs are limited, assumptions about market activity and risk are used and such securities are generally categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of March 31, 2019in valuing the fund’s investments:
| | | | | |
| Level 1 – Unadjusted Quoted Prices | Level 2 –Other Significant Observable Inputs | Level 3 –Significant Unobservable Inputs | Total |
Assets ($) | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | | |
Equity Securities - Common Stocks† | 1,951,937,857 | - | - | 1,951,937,857 |
Exchange-Traded Funds | 30,619,175 | - | - | 30,619,175 |
Investment Companies | 149,763,271 | - | - | 149,763,271 |
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations.
At March 31, 2019, there were no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy. It is the fund’s policy to recognize transfers between levels at the end of the reporting period.
(b)Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses
24
from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Adviser, or U.S. Government and Agency securities. The fund is entitled to receive all dividends, interest and distributions on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner, The Bank of New York Mellon is required to replace the securities for the benefit of the fund or credit the fund with the market value of the unreturned securities and is subrogated to the fund’s rights against the borrower and the collateral. Additionally, the contractual maturity of security lending transactions are on an overnight and continuous basis. During the period ended March 31, 2019, The Bank of New York Mellon earned $64,198 from lending portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by the Adviser are considered “affiliated” under the Act.
(d) Dividends and distributions to shareholders: Dividends and distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income and
25
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)(continued)
net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended March 31, 2019, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period ended March 31, 2019, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each tax year in the three-year period ended September 30, 2018 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 was as follows: ordinary income $12,763,354 and long-term capital gains $91,245,022. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
(f) New Accounting Pronouncements: In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”). The update provides guidance that eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Management is currently assessing the potential impact of these changes to future financial statements.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other long-term open-end funds managed by the Adviser in a $1.030 billion unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. (the “Citibank Credit Facility”) and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon (the “BNYM Credit Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions (each, a “Facility”). The Citibank Credit Facility is available in two tranches: (i) Tranche A is in an amount equal to $830 million and is available to all long-term open-ended funds, including the fund, and (ii) Tranche B is in amount equal to $200 million and is available only to the Dreyfus Floating Rate Income Fund, a series of The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc. Prior to October 3, 2018, the unsecured credit facility with Citibank, N.A. was $830 million. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for Tranche A of the Citibank Credit Facility and the BNYM Credit Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates
26
determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing. During the period ended March 31, 2019, the fund did not borrow under the Facilities.
NOTE 3—Investment Advisory Fee, Sub-Investment Advisory Fee, Administration Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
(a)Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Adviser, the investment advisory fee is computed at the annual rate of .60% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
Pursuant to a sub-investment advisory agreement between the Adviser and the Sub adviser, the Sub adviser serves as the fund’s sub-investment adviser responsible for the day-to-day management of the fund’s portfolio. The Adviser pays the sub adviser a monthly fee at an annual percentage of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets. The Adviser has obtained an exemptive order from the SEC (the “Order”), upon which the fund may rely, to use a manager of managers approach that permits the Adviser, subject to certain conditions and approval by the Board, to enter into and materially amend sub-investment advisory agreements with one or more sub-investment advisers who are either unaffiliated with the Adviser or are wholly-owned subsidiaries (as defined under the Act) of the Adviser’ ultimate parent company, BNY Mellon, without obtaining shareholder approval. The Order also allows the fund to disclose the sub-investment advisory fee paid by the Adviser to any unaffiliated sub-investment adviser in the aggregate with other unaffiliated sub-investment advisers in documents filed with the SEC and provided to shareholders. In addition, pursuant to the Order, it is not necessary to disclose the sub-investment advisory fee payable by the Adviser separately to a sub-investment adviser that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BNY Mellon in documents filed with the SEC and provided to shareholders; such fees are to be aggregated with fees payable to the Adviser. The Adviser has ultimate responsibility (subject to oversight by the Board) to supervise any sub-investment adviser and recommend the hiring, termination, and replacement of any sub-investment adviser to the Board.
The fund has a Fund Accounting and Administrative Services Agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with the Adviser, whereby the Adviser performs administrative, accounting and recordkeeping services for the fund. The fund has agreed to compensate the Adviser for providing accounting and recordkeeping services, administration, compliance monitoring, regulatory and shareholder reporting, as well as related facilities, equipment and clerical help. The fee is based on the fund’s average daily net assets and computed at the following annual rates: .06%
27
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)(continued)
of the first $500 million, .04% of the next $500 million and .02% in excess of $1 billion.
In addition, after applying any expense limitations or fee waivers that reduce the fees paid to the Adviser for this service, the Adviser has contractually agreed in writing to waive any remaining fees for this service to the extent that they exceed both the Adviser’ costs in providing these services and a reasonable allocation of the costs incurred by the Adviser and its affiliates related to the support and oversight of these services. The fund also reimburses the Adviser for the out-of-pocket expenses incurred in performing this service for the fund. Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, the fund was charged $77,804 during the period ended March 31, 2019.
During the period ended March 31, 2019, the Distributor retained $27,565 from commissions earned on sales of the fund’s Class A shares and $6,498 from CDSC fees on redemptions of the fund’s Class C shares.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing its shares at an annual rate of .75% of the value of its average daily net assets. During the period ended March 31, 2019, Class C shares were charged $206,643 pursuant to the Distribution Plan.
Under the Service Plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class Z shares reimburse the Distributor for distributing its shares and servicing shareholder accounts at an amount not to exceed an annual rate of up to .25% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class Z shares. During the period ended March 31, 2019, Class Z shares were charged $44,051 pursuant to the Service Plan.
(c)Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A and Class C shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of .25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services. The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (securities dealers, financial institutions or other industry professionals) with respect to these services. The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended March 31, 2019, Class A and Class C shares were charged $372,897and $68,881, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
Under its terms, the Distribution Plan and Shareholder Services Plan shall remain in effect from year to year, provided such continuance is approved
28
annually by a vote of a majority of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of or in any agreement related to the Distribution Plan or Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund has an arrangement with the transfer agent whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset transfer agency fees and the fund had an arrangement with the custodian to receive earnings credits when positive cash balance are maintained, which were used to offset custody fees. Effective February 1, 2019, the arrangement with the custodian changed whereby the fund will no longer receive earnings credits to offset its custody fees and will receive interest income or overdraft fees going forward. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits, if any, as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, under a transfer agency agreement for providing transfer agency and cash management services for the fund. The majority of transfer agency fees are comprised of amounts paid on a per account basis, while cash management fees are related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended March 31, 2019, the fund was charged $61,961 for transfer agency services. These fees are included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. These fees are determined based on net assets, geographic region and transaction activity. During the period ended March 31, 2019, the fund was charged $22,256 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended March 31, 2019, the fund was charged $6,305 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer and his staff. These fees are included in Miscellaneous in the Statement of Operations.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: investment advisory fees $1,034,576, administration fees $13,002, Distribution Plan fees $45,179, Shareholder Services Plan fees $82,845, custodian fees $12,694, Chief Compliance Officer fees $6,305 and transfer agency fees $20,038.
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
29
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)(continued)
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended March 31, 2019, amounted to $671,741,186 and $533,117,731, respectively.
At March 31, 2019, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $575,430,039, consisting of $623,458,127 gross unrealized appreciation and $48,028,088 gross unrealized depreciation.
At March 31, 2019, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
30
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY, ADMINISTRATION AND SUB-INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS (Unaudited)
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on February 27-28, 2019, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement and Administration Agreement, pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory and administrative services, and the Sub-Investment Advisory Agreement (collectively, the “Agreements”), pursuant to which Mellon Investments Corporation (the “Subadviser”) provides day-to-day management of the fund’s investments. The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus and the Subadviser. In considering the renewal of the Agreements, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below. The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund. The Board considered information provided to it at the meeting and in previous presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex (such as retail direct or intermediary, in which intermediaries typically are paid by the fund and/or Dreyfus) and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each intermediary or distribution channel, as applicable to the fund.
The Board also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements. The Board also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructures, as well as Dreyfus’ supervisory activities over the Subadviser. The Board also considered portfolio management’s brokerage policies and practices (including policies and practices regarding soft dollars) and the standards applied in seeking best execution.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio. The Board reviewed reports prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended December 31, 2018, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the
31
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY, ADMINISTRATION AND SUB-INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
“Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Broadridge as of the date of its analysis. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Broadridge used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations and policies that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds. The Board discussed with representatives of Dreyfus, its affiliates and/or the Subadviser the results of the comparisons and considered that the fund’s total return performance (Class A and Class I shares) was above the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians for all periods. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s benchmark index.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons for Class A shares. The Board considered that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median and the fund’s actual management fee and total expenses were below the Expense Group median and Expense Universe medians (total expenses were the lowest in the Expense Group).
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees (1) paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund and (2) paid to Dreyfus or the Subadviser or its affiliates for advising any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors. The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness of the fund’s management fee.
The Board considered the fee to the Subadviser in relation to the fee paid to Dreyfus by the fund and the respective services provided by the Subadviser and Dreyfus. The Board also took into consideration that the Subadviser’s fee is paid by Dreyfus (out of its fee from the fund) and not the fund.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and its affiliates and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund and the aggregate profitability percentage to Dreyfus and its affiliates for managing the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable, given the services rendered and service levels provided by Dreyfus. The Board also had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex.
32
The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
The Board considered on the advice of its counsel the profitability analysis (1) as part of its evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreements, considered in relation to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus and the Subadviser, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, supported the renewal of the Agreements and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Since Dreyfus, and not the fund, pays the Subadviser pursuant to the Sub-Investment Advisory Agreement, the Board did not consider the Subadviser’s profitability to be relevant to its deliberations. Dreyfus representatives also stated that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The Board also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus and the Subadviser from acting as investment adviser and sub-investment adviser, respectively, and took into consideration the soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreements. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
· The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus and the Subadviser are adequate and appropriate.
· The Board was satisfied with the fund’s performance.
· The Board concluded that the fees paid to Dreyfus and the Subadviser continued to be appropriate under the circumstances and in light of the factors and the totality of the services provided as discussed above.
· The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreement and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
In evaluating the Agreements, the Board considered these conclusions and determinations and also relied on its previous knowledge, gained through meetings and other interactions with Dreyfus and its affiliates and the Subadviser, of Dreyfus and the Subadviser and the services provided to the fund by Dreyfus and the Subadviser. The Board also relied on information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the
33
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY, ADMINISTRATION AND SUB-INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
year relating to the operations of the fund and the investment management and other services provided under the Agreements, including information on the investment performance of the fund in comparison to similar mutual funds and benchmark performance indices; general market outlook as applicable to the fund; and compliance reports. In addition, the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of the Agreements for the fund, or substantially similar agreements for other Dreyfus funds that the Board oversees, during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board’s conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the fund’s arrangements, or substantially similar arrangements for other Dreyfus funds that the Board oversees, in prior years. The Board determined to renew the Agreements.
34
NOTES
35
NOTES
36
NOTES
37
Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Adviser
The Dreyfus Corporation
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Sub-Investment Adviser
Mellon Investments Corporation
BNY Mellon Center
One Boston Place
Boston, MA 02108
Custodian
The Bank of New York Mellon
240 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10286
Transfer Agent &
Dividend Disbursing Agent
Dreyfus Transfer, Inc.
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Distributor
MBSC Securities Corporation
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
| |
Ticker Symbols: | Class A: DBMAX Class C: DBMCX Class I: SDSCX Class Y: DBMYX Class Z: DBMZX |
Telephone Call your financial representative or 1-800-DREYFUS
Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144
E-mailSend your request toinfo@dreyfus.com
InternetInformation can be viewed online or downloaded atwww.dreyfus.com
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.
A description of the policies and procedures that the fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities and information regarding how the fund voted these proxies for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available atwww.dreyfus.com and on the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-DREYFUS.
| |
© 2019 MBSC Securities Corporation 6921SA0319 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df7d3/df7d3730315db9b4c26cd77298e743b99bb145fe" alt=""
|