UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number | 811-04813 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Dreyfus Investment Funds |
| ||||
| (Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter) |
| ||||
|
|
| ||||
|
c/o The Dreyfus Corporation 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 |
| ||||
| (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
| ||||
|
|
| ||||
| Michael A. Rosenberg, Esq. 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 |
| ||||
| (Name and address of agent for service) |
| ||||
| ||||||
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: | (212) 922-6000 | |||||
|
| |||||
Date of fiscal year end:
| 9/30 |
| ||||
Date of reporting period: | 3/31/2011 |
| ||||
The following N-CSR relates only to the Registrant’s series listed below and does not affect the other series of the Registrant, which have a different fiscal year end and, therefore, different N-CSR reporting requirements. Separate N-CSR Forms will be filed for those series, as appropriate.
-Dreyfus/The Boston Company Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund
-Dreyfus/The Boston Company Large Cap Core Fund
-Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Growth Fund
-Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Tax-Sensitive Equity Fund
-Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Value Fund
-Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/Mid Growth Fund
-Dreyfus/Standish Intermediate Tax Exempt Bond Fund
-Dreyfus/Newton International Equity Fund
1 |
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents | |
THE FUND | |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
12 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
13 | Statement of Operations |
14 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
16 | Financial Highlights |
19 | Notes to Financial Statements |
32 | Information About the Renewal of the Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | |
Back Cover |
Dreyfus/The Boston
Company Emerging
Markets Core Equity Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus/The Boston Company Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund, covering the six-month period from October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011.
Equities throughout the world fared well over the past six months. International stock markets have rallied broadly since the fall of 2010, when new rounds of monetary stimulus from U.S. and foreign central banks gave investors confidence that the global economy was unlikely to slip back into recession. As a result, developed markets rebounded strongly from relatively depressed levels, while emerging markets added more moderately to their previous gains.Although political uprisings in the Middle East and the disasters in Japan injected some uncertainty into the investment climate, these events do not appear to have derailed the global market rally. Market sectors that tend to be sensitive to macroeconomic changes performed particularly well as commodity prices climbed and investors looked forward to better business conditions.
We currently expect most developed and emerging markets to adopt less stimulative fiscal and monetary policies over the remainder of 2011 as the global economy reaches the middle stages of its cycle. Moreover, in the wake of recent gains we believe that selectivity will become a more important determinant of investment success in international markets.We favor the core of Europe over more peripheral members of the European Union, and while we expect the emerging markets to grow faster than developed markets, the growth rate in China seems likely to moderate.As always, your financial advisor can help you align your investment portfolio with the opportunities and challenges that 2011 has in store.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
April 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011, as provided by Sean P. Fitzgibbon, CFA, and Jay Malikowski, Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended March 31, 2011, Dreyfus/The Boston Company Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of 9.70%, Class C shares returned 9.19% and Class I shares returned 9.99%.1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets Index (the “MSCI EM Index”), produced a total return of 9.61% for the same period.2 Emerging-markets stocks generally rallied over the reporting period while the global economic recovery gathered momentum.The fund’s returns were roughly in line with its benchmark, as relative strength in the technology and energy sectors was balanced by weaker results in the consumer staples and industrials sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks long-term growth of capital.To pursue this goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of companies that are located in foreign countries represented in the MSCI EM Index.The fund may invest up to 20% of its net assets in fixed income securities and may invest in preferred stocks of any credit quality if common stocks of the relevant company are not available. The fund employs a “bottom-up” investment approach, which emphasizes individual stock selection.
Greater Economic Confidence Supported Rallying Markets
The global economic recovery gained traction in the fall of 2010 after a new round of easing of monetary policy by major central banks alleviated investors’ economic worries. In addition, by October most European banks had passed a series of “stress tests,” corporate earnings climbed across a variety of regions and industry groups, mergers-and-acquisitions activity intensified and commodity prices surged higher. Greater clarity regarding fiscal and tax policies in the United States after the national midterm elections in November also supported global investor sentiment.
The Fund | 3 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
The resulting rally in global equity markets persisted into February when political uprisings in the Middle East sparked a sharp increase in oil and gas prices, which investors worried might dampen global economic growth. In March, a devastating earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster in Japan gave investors cause for concern regarding the world’s second largest economy. However, investor sentiment proved resilient in light of more encouraging economic news in other regions of the world, and most markets had regained all of their lost ground by the reporting period’s end.
In a reversal of the trend over the past several years, emerging equity markets generally produced lower returns than more developed markets during the reporting period. Because most emerging markets were not as severely affected by the Great Recession in 2008 and 2009, their stock markets had less room to rally during the subsequent global economic recovery. In addition, scandals in some markets, most notably India, reminded investors of the risks inherent in investing in former third-world nations.
Stock Selections Produced Positive Results
Our security selection strategy proved effective during the reporting period, achieving especially attractive results in China, where automobile seller Great Wall Motor benefited from surging demand for car and trucks in many of the nation’s more remote cities. From a market sector perspective, the fund achieved above-average results in the information technology sector, where Taiwanese mobile handset maker HTC encountered robust sales of its Android-based phones.The energy sector ranked as the benchmark’s strongest segment and contributed positively to the fund’s relative performance, mainly due to gains in Russian oil giant Gazprom and South Africa’s Sasol.
On the other hand, disappointments during the reporting period included India, where an influence peddling scandal generally depressed investor sentiment. In addition, Indian building materials supplier Sintex Industries was hurt by concerns that the scandal might delay government approvals of some construction projects. Also in India, rising fuel costs hurt earnings of budget airline SpiceJet, which we sold during the reporting period. Finally, the fund suffered shortfalls in the consumer staples sector, as higher costs for raw materials weighed on the earnings of food companies. For example, China Agri-Industries Holdings lost value due to the rising price of soybeans.
4
Positioned for Greater Global Growth
We expect the global economic recovery to persist. Although inflationary pressures remain a concern in Latin America and Asia, some markets in Eastern Europe have so far proved relatively insensitive to rising commodity prices. Consequently, we have increased the fund’s holdings in Russia, where we expect a stock market dominated by energy producers to benefit from high oil prices.We have identified a number of attractively valued opportunities in India, where political risks appear to be easing. Conversely, we recently reduced the fund’s exposure to Indonesia, where stocks have become more richly valued. In our judgment, these strategies position the fund well as the global economic cycle moves to a more mature phase.
April 15, 2011
Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment | |
style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the | |
fund’s prospectus. | |
The fund’s performance will be influenced by political, social and economic factors affecting | |
investments in foreign companies.These special risks include exposure to currency fluctuations, less | |
liquidity, less developed or less efficient trading markets, lack of comprehensive company | |
information, political instability and differing auditing and legal standards. Investments in foreign | |
currencies are subject to the risk that those currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. | |
dollar, or, in the case of hedged positions, that the U.S. dollar will decline relative to the currency | |
being hedged. | |
Emerging markets tend to be more volatile than the markets of more mature economies, and | |
generally have less diverse and less mature economic structures and less stable political systems than | |
those of developed countries. | |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares, or the applicable | |
contingent deferred sales charges imposed on redemptions in the case of Class C shares. Had these | |
charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future | |
results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be | |
worth more or less than their original cost.The fund’s returns reflect the absorption of certain fund | |
expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an agreement in effect through February 1, | |
2012, at which time it may be extended, terminated or modified. Had these expenses not been | |
absorbed, the fund’s returns would have been lower. | |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. – Reflects reinvestment of net dividends and, where applicable, |
capital gain distributions. The Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets Index | |
is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index that is designed to measure the | |
equity performance in global emerging markets. The index consists of 26 MSCI emerging | |
market national indices. MSCI Indices reflect investable opportunities for global investors by | |
taking into account local market restrictions on share ownership by foreigners. Investors cannot | |
invest directly in any index. |
The Fund | 5 |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus/The Boston Company Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund from October 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||
assuming actual returns for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 11.76 | $ | 15.65 | $ | 7.85 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,097.00 | $ | 1,091.90 | $ | 1,099.90 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 11.30 | $ | 15.03 | $ | 7.54 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,013.71 | $ | 1,009.97 | $ | 1,017.45 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 2.25% for Class A, 3.00% for Class C and 1.50% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
Common Stocks—88.4% | Shares | Value ($) |
Brazil—4.6% | ||
Banco do Brasil | 10,600 | 191,854 |
Fleury | 10,900 | 161,899 |
Gafisa | 16,800 | 106,193 |
Obrascon Huarte Lain Brasil | 2,300 | 87,202 |
Porto Seguro | 5,000 | 84,525 |
Rossi Residencial | 16,800 | 140,047 |
771,720 | ||
China—9.7% | ||
Changyou.com, ADR | 3,540 a | 113,988 |
China Communications Construction, Cl. H | 167,000 | 159,302 |
China Construction Bank, Cl. H | 340,000 | 318,646 |
China Petroleum & Chemical, Cl. H | 230,000 | 230,634 |
China Vanadium Titano-Magnetite Mining | 249,000 a | 107,237 |
Evergrande Real Estate Group | 181,000 | 99,592 |
Great Wall Motor, Cl. H | 102,750 | 189,951 |
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China, Cl. H | 230,000 | 191,012 |
Mongolian Mining | 104,000 | 132,899 |
Weichai Power, Cl. H | 13,000 | 78,967 |
1,622,228 | ||
Hong Kong—7.6% | ||
China Agri-Industries Holdings | 190,481 | 213,535 |
China Minsheng Bank, Cl. H | 207,500 | 190,733 |
China Mobile | 37,500 | 345,421 |
CNOOC | 105,000 | 264,574 |
Country Garden Holdings | 214,000 | 93,539 |
Guangdong Investment | 150,000 | 75,785 |
Hutchison Whampoa | 8,000 | 94,722 |
1,278,309 | ||
Hungary—2.0% | ||
MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas | 1,690 a | 216,038 |
OTP Bank | 4,050a | 119,845 |
335,883 | ||
India—9.2% | ||
Apollo Tyres | 82,250 | 128,276 |
Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals | 68,940 | 121,663 |
The Fund | 7 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | |
India (continued) | |||
Hexaware Technologies | 100,860 | 149,158 | |
Oil & Natural Gas | 16,280 | 105,905 | |
Shree Renuka Sugars | 132,370 | 206,592 | |
Sintex Industries | 93,480 | 317,784 | |
Tata Consultancy Services | 5,940 | 157,508 | |
Tata Motors | 8,250 | 230,785 | |
Welspun | 25,680 | 118,855 | |
1,536,526 | |||
Indonesia—1.7% | |||
Bank Mandiri | 125,500 | 98,007 | |
Bank Pembangunan Daerah Jawa Barat dan Banten | 444,500 | 64,831 | |
Indofood Sukses Makmur | 209,000 | 129,612 | |
292,450 | |||
Malaysia—2.9% | |||
AMMB Holdings | 62,000 | 132,854 | |
Axiata Group | 80,800a | 127,786 | |
KNM Group | 108,500 | 98,873 | |
Tenaga Nasional | 57,875 | 119,428 | |
478,941 | |||
Mexico—2.4% | |||
America Movil, ADR, Ser. L | 3,600 | 209,160 | |
Fomento Economico Mexicano, ADR | 3,240 | 190,188 | |
399,348 | |||
Poland—.8% | |||
KGHM Polska Miedz | 2,230 | 141,515 | |
Russia—8.9% | |||
Gazprom, ADR | 15,520 | 502,382 | |
LUKOIL, ADR | 6,550 | 469,308 | |
Magnitogorsk Iron & Steel Works, GDR | 5,030 b,c,d | 73,589 | |
MMC Norilsk Nickel, ADR | 6,432 | 170,062 | |
Sberbank of Russian, GDR | 650 | 269,444 | |
1,484,785 | |||
South Africa—6.5% | |||
Aveng | 24,860 | 131,080 | |
Exxaro Resources | 6,980 | 170,719 |
8
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
South Africa (continued) | ||
FirstRand | 47,580 | 141,369 |
MTN Group | 16,744 | 338,023 |
Sasol | 5,210 | 301,502 |
1,082,693 | ||
South Korea—14.4% | ||
BS Financial Group | 11,910 a | 172,632 |
Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical | 2,320 | 53,085 |
Daegu Bank | 8,440 | 138,493 |
Daehan Steel | 4,690 | 43,182 |
Hana Financial Group | 2,200 | 95,164 |
Hyundai Mipo Dockyard | 906 | 154,448 |
Hyundai Mobis | 1,284 | 383,345 |
Korea Electric Power | 3,780a | 92,695 |
KT | 3,090 | 109,578 |
Kukdo Chemical | 1,100 | 56,858 |
POSCO | 261 | 120,156 |
Samsung Electronics | 645 | 548,010 |
SK Holdings | 846 | 127,253 |
SK Innovation | 722 | 138,878 |
Woori Finance Holdings | 4,780 | 63,402 |
Youngone | 5,916 | 56,089 |
Youngone Holdings | 1,804 | 54,024 |
2,407,292 | ||
Taiwan—10.6% | ||
Advanced Semiconductor Engineering | 74,892 | 81,242 |
Asia Cement | 53,168 | 59,756 |
Catcher Technology | 17,000 | 84,114 |
Chroma Ate | 21,000 | 67,842 |
Chunghwa Telecom | 23,200 | 72,267 |
CTCI | 102,000 | 116,199 |
Fubon Financial Holding | 116,195 | 154,300 |
Grand Pacific Petrochemical | 130,000 | 80,016 |
HON HAI Precision Industry | 55,240 | 193,485 |
HTC | 8,300 | 324,588 |
Powertech Technology | 38,500 | 120,581 |
The Fund | 9 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Taiwan (continued) | ||
Taishin Financial Holdings | 233,463 | 132,187 |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, ADR | 24,439 | 297,667 |
1,784,244 | ||
Thailand—2.9% | ||
Asian Property Development | 338,700 | 67,836 |
Bangchak Petroleum | 102,800 | 62,760 |
Banpu | 3,600 | 83,184 |
Kasikornbank | 30,900 | 128,712 |
Krung Thai Bank | 103,500 | 62,229 |
Krung Thai Bank | 135,300 | 82,312 |
487,033 | ||
Turkey—4.2% | ||
Arcelik | 17,860 | 82,588 |
Ford Otomotiv Sanayi | 7,500 | 71,646 |
Haci Omer Sabanci Holding | 21,587 | 100,382 |
KOC Holding | 25,780 | 119,880 |
Turk Telekomunikasyon | 43,670 | 219,474 |
Turkiye Halk Bankasi | 13,800 | 106,804 |
700,774 | ||
Total Common Stocks | ||
(cost $11,330,097) | 14,803,741 | |
Preferred Stocks—11.4% | ||
Brazil | ||
Banco Bradesco | 16,575 | 338,576 |
Banco do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul | 14,100 | 173,589 |
Bradespar | 5,500 | 144,183 |
Cia de Bebidas das Americas | 2,700 | 75,163 |
Cia Paranaense de Energia, Cl. B | 9,000 | 245,031 |
Itau Unibanco Holding | 3,924 | 93,494 |
Petroleo Brasileiro | 14,100 | 246,220 |
Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais, Cl. A | 4,350 | 52,622 |
Vale, Cl. A | 18,900 | 548,600 |
Total Preferred Stocks | ||
(cost $1,169,478) | 1,917,478 |
10
Investment of Cash Collateral | |||
for Securities Loaned—.0% | Shares | Value ($) | |
Registered Investment Company; | |||
Dreyfus Institutional Cash Advantage Fund | |||
(cost $4,050) | 4,050e | 4,050 | |
Total Investments (cost $12,503,625) | 99.8% | 16,725,269 | |
Cash and Receivables (Net) | .2% | 28,198 | |
Net Assets | 100.0% | 16,753,467 |
ADR—American Depository Receipts |
GDR—Global Depository Receipts |
a Non-income producing security. |
b Security, or portion thereof, on loan.At March 31, 2011, the value of the fund’s security on loan was $4,389 and |
the value of the collateral held by the fund was $4,050. |
c The valuation of this security has been determined in good faith by management under the direction of the Board of |
Trustees.At March 31, 2011, the value of this security amounted to $73,589 or 0.4% of net assets. |
d Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.This security may be resold in |
transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.At March 31, 2011, this security had |
a value of $73,589 or 0.4% of net assets. |
e Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | |||
Value (%) | Value (%) | ||
Financial | 23.3 | Consumer Discretionary | 7.2 |
Energy | 16.2 | Consumer Staples | 4.4 |
Materials | 13.2 | Utilities | 3.2 |
Information Technology | 12.8 | Health Care | 1.3 |
Industrial | 9.7 | Money Market Investment | .0 |
Telecommunication Services | 8.5 | 99.8 | |
† Based on net assets. | |||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 11 |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Cost | Value | |||
Assets ($): | ||||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments (including | ||||
securities on loan, valued at $4,389)—Note 1(c): | ||||
Unaffiliated issuers | 12,499,575 | 16,721,219 | ||
Affiliated issuers | 4,050 | 4,050 | ||
Cash | 8,239 | |||
Cash denominated in foreign currencies | 90,750 | 92,167 | ||
Receivable for investment securities sold | 93,789 | |||
Dividends and interest receivable | 23,503 | |||
Unrealized appreciation on forward foreign | ||||
currency exchange contracts—Note 4 | 494 | |||
Prepaid expenses | 26,573 | |||
16,970,034 | ||||
Liabilities ($): | ||||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 21,673 | |||
Payable for investment securities purchased | 168,126 | |||
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(c) | 4,050 | |||
Unrealized depreciation on forward foreign | ||||
currency exchange contracts—Note 4 | 329 | |||
Accrued expenses | 22,389 | |||
216,567 | ||||
Net Assets ($) | 16,753,467 | |||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||
Paid-in capital | 14,288,187 | |||
Accumulated distributions in excess of investment income—net | (116,302) | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (1,641,646) | |||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||
on investments and foreign currency transactions | 4,223,228 | |||
Net Assets ($) | 16,753,467 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share | ||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||
Net Assets ($) | 192,574 | 236,361 | 16,324,532 | |
Shares Outstanding | 6,524 | 8,216 | 556,194 | |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 29.52 | 28.77 | 29.35 | |
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends (net of $11,494 foreign taxes withheld at source): | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 95,927 | |
Affiliated issuers | 39 | |
Income from securities lending—Note 1(c) | 250 | |
Total Income | 96,216 | |
Expenses: | ||
Investment advisory fee—Note 3(a) | 90,612 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 52,378 | |
Accounting and administrative fees—Note 3(a) | 22,500 | |
Auditing fees | 18,971 | |
Registration fees | 18,265 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 12,030 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 7,375 | |
Legal fees | 2,624 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 931 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 575 | |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 22 | |
Miscellaneous | 11,184 | |
Total Expenses | 237,467 | |
Less—expense reimbursement from The Dreyfus | ||
Corporation due to undertaking—Note 3(a) | (111,279) | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(c) | (2) | |
Net Expenses | 126,186 | |
Investment (Loss)—Net | (29,970) | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | 1,304,827 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on forward foreign currency exchange contracts | (1,545) | |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | 1,303,282 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on | ||
investments and foreign currency transactions | 288,177 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on | ||
forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 165 | |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | 288,342 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 1,591,624 | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 1,561,654 | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 13 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income (loss)—net | (29,970) | 117,960 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 1,303,282 | 2,659,677 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 288,342 | 103,765 | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | 1,561,654 | 2,881,402 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net: | ||||
Class A Shares | (603) | — | ||
Class C Shares | — | (2,360) | ||
Class I Shares | (62,615) | (218,041) | ||
Total Dividends | (63,218) | (220,401) | ||
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Class A Shares | 81,709 | 127,583 | ||
Class C Shares | 6,117 | 53,392 | ||
Class I Shares | 145,503 | 1,420,351 | ||
Dividends reinvested: | ||||
Class A Shares | 512 | — | ||
Class C Shares | — | 2,139 | ||
Class I Shares | 4,708 | 137,480 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Class A Shares | (57,369) | (13,885) | ||
Class C Shares | (48,724) | (8,496) | ||
Class I Shares | (1,265,104) | (4,780,001) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | ||||
Beneficial Interest Transactions | (1,132,648) | (3,061,437) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 365,788 | (400,436) | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 16,387,679 | 16,788,115 | ||
End of Period | 16,753,467 | 16,387,679 | ||
Accumulated distributions in excess of | ||||
investment income—net | (116,302) | (23,114) |
14
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Class A | ||||
Shares sold | 2,869 | 5,107 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 18 | — | ||
Shares redeemed | (2,012) | (553) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 875 | 4,554 | ||
Class C | ||||
Shares sold | 217 | 2,190 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | — | 89 | ||
Shares redeemed | (1,778) | (369) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (1,561) | 1,910 | ||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 5,181 | 59,386 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 169 | 5,719 | ||
Shares redeemed | (45,495) | (200,276) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (40,145) | (135,171) | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 15 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following tables describe the performance for each share class for the fiscal periods indicated.All information (except portfolio turnover rate) reflects financial results for a single fund share.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | |||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | ||||
Class A Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | ||
Per Share Data ($): | |||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 26.99 | 22.70 | 13.55 | ||
Investment Operations: | |||||
Investment income (loss)—netb | (.16) | .17 | .14 | ||
Net realized and unrealized | |||||
gain (loss) on investments | 2.77 | 4.12 | 9.01 | ||
Total from Investment Operations | 2.61 | 4.29 | 9.15 | ||
Distributions: | |||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.08) | — | — | ||
Net asset value, end of period | 29.52 | 26.99 | 22.70 | ||
Total Return (%)c | 9.70d | 18.85 | 67.60d | ||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | |||||
Ratio of total expenses | |||||
to average net assets | 3.71e | 3.69 | 11.21e | ||
Ratio of net expenses | |||||
to average net assets | 2.25e | 2.25 | 2.00e | ||
Ratio of net investment income | |||||
(loss) to average net assets | (1.09)e | .71 | 1.56e | ||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 32.96d | 102.30 | 157.45 | ||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 193 | 152 | 25 |
a | From March 31, 2009 (commencement of initial offering) to September 30, 2009. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
Six Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||
Class C Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | |||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 26.36 | 22.62 | 13.55 | |||
Investment Operations: | ||||||
Investment (loss)—netb | (.25) | (.13) | (.03) | |||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 2.66 | 4.17 | 9.10 | |||
Total from Investment Operations | 2.41 | 4.04 | 9.07 | |||
Distributions: | ||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | — | (.30) | — | |||
Net asset value, end of period | 28.77 | 26.36 | 22.62 | |||
Total Return (%)c | 9.19d | 17.95 | 66.94d | |||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||
to average net assets | 3.96e | 4.18 | 3.80e | |||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||
to average net assets | 3.00e | 3.00 | 2.75e | |||
Ratio of net investment (loss) | ||||||
to average net assets | (1.84)e | (.57) | (.35)e | |||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 32.96d | 102.30 | 157.45 | |||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 236 | 258 | 178 |
a | From March 31, 2009 (commencement of initial offering) to September 30, 2009. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 17 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
Class I Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | 2008 | 2007 | 2006b | ||||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, | ||||||||||||
beginning of period | 26.79 | 22.67 | 21.33 | 33.24 | 20.55 | 20.00 | ||||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||
Investment income (loss)—netc | (.05) | .18 | .24 | .35 | .31 | .06 | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 2.72 | 4.26 | 2.21 | (8.86) | 12.62 | .49 | ||||||
Total from Investment Operations | 2.67 | 4.44 | 2.45 | (8.51) | 12.93 | .55 | ||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||
Dividends from | ||||||||||||
investment income—net | (.11) | (.32) | (.26) | (.26) | (.24) | — | ||||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||||
gain on investments | — | — | (.85) | (3.14) | — | — | ||||||
Total Distributions | (.11) | (.32) | (1.11) | (3.40) | (.24) | — | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period | 29.35 | 26.79 | 22.67 | 21.33 | 33.24 | 20.55 | ||||||
Total Return (%) | 9.99d | 19.73 | 14.90 | (28.51) | 63.25 | 2.75d | ||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | 2.86e | 3.07 | 3.50 | 2.74 | 3.18 | 8.64e | ||||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.50e | 1.50 | 1.43 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.45e | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||||
(loss) to average net assets | (.33)e | .75 | 1.43 | 1.21 | 1.15 | 1.31e | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 32.96d | 102.30 | 157.45 | 128 | 76 | 31d | ||||||
Net Assets, end of period | ||||||||||||
($ x 1,000) | 16,325 | 15,978 | 16,585 | 15,328 | 13,671 | 5,693 |
a | The fund commenced offering three classes of shares on March 31, 2009.The existing shares were redesignated as |
Class I shares. | |
b | From July 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2006. |
c | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus/The Boston Company Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Investment Funds (the “Trust”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering eleven series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term growth of capital. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares.The fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class C and Class I. Class A shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class I shares are sold primarily to bank trust departments and other financial service providers (including The Bank of NewYork Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus), acting on behalf of customers having a qualified trust or investment account or relationship at such institution, and bear no distribution or shareholder services fees. Class I shares are offered without a front-end sales charge or CDSC. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to, the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The Trust accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The Fund | 19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant ADRs and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Trustees, certain factors may be considered such as: funda-
20
mental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. Investments denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at the prevailing rates of exchange. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts (“forward contracts”) are valued at the forward rate.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The Fund | 21 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of March 31, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
Level 2—Other | Level 3— | ||||||
Level 1— | Significant | Significant | |||||
Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | |||||
Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | ||||
Assets ($) | |||||||
Investments in Securities: | |||||||
Equity Securities— | |||||||
Foreign† | 16,647,630 | 73,589 | — | 16,721,219 | |||
Mutual Funds | 4,050 | — | — | 4,050 | |||
Forward Foreign | |||||||
Currency Exchange | |||||||
Contracts†† | — | 494 | — | 494 | |||
Liabilities ($) | |||||||
Other Financial | |||||||
Instruments: | |||||||
Forward Foreign | |||||||
Currency Exchange | |||||||
Contracts†† | — | (329 | ) | — | (329 | ) | |
† | See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. | ||||||
†† | Amount shown represents unrealized appreciation (depreciation) at period end. |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at March 31, 2011.
(b) Foreign currency transactions: The fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes
22
in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized on securities transactions between trade and settlement date and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities other than investments resulting from changes in exchange rates. Foreign currency gains and losses on investments are included with net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
(c) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit. The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the
The Fund | 23 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
period ended March 31, 2011, The Bank of New York Mellon earned $135 from lending portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
Investing in foreign markets may involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in the U.S. These risks include revaluation of currencies, high rates of inflation, repatriation restrictions on income and capital, and adverse political and economic developments. Moreover, securities issued in these markets may be less liquid, subject to government ownership controls and delayed settlements, and their prices may be more volatile than those of comparable securities in the U.S.
(d) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended March 31, 2011 were as follows:
Affiliated | |||||||
Investment | Value | Value | Net | ||||
Company | 9/30/2010 | ($) | Purchases ($) | Sales ($) | 3/31/2011 | ($) | Assets (%) |
Dreyfus | |||||||
Institutional | |||||||
Preferred Plus | |||||||
Money Market | |||||||
Fund | — | 1,462,494 | 1,462,494 | — | — | ||
Dreyfus | |||||||
Institutional | |||||||
Cash Advantage | |||||||
Fund | 144,550 | 2,259,658 | 2,400,158 | 4,050 | — | ||
Total | 144,550 | 3,722,152 | 3,862,652 | 4,050 | — |
(e) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy
24
of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(f) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $2,045,216 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to September 30, 2010. If not applied, $1,300,051 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2017 and $745,165 expires in fiscal 2018.
Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years.As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryovers may be more likely to expire unused.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 was as follows: ordinary income $220,401.The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
The Fund | 25 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing. During the period ended on March 31, 2011, the fund did not borrow under the Facilities.
NOTE 3—Investment Advisory Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Manager, the investment advisory fee is computed at the annual rate of 1.10% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. The Manager has agreed, until February 1, 2012, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class A, Class C and Class I shares (excluding Rule 12b-1 fees, shareholder services fees, taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed 2.00%, 2.00% and 1.50%, respectively, of the value of such class’ average daily net assets. The expense reimbursement, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $111,279 during the period ended March 31, 2011.
During the period, the Trust had an agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon pursuant to whichThe Bank of NewYork Mellon provided administration and fund accounting services for the fund. For these services, the fund pays The Bank of NewYork Mellon a fixed fee plus asset and transaction based fees, as well as out-of-pocket expenses. Pursuant to this agreement, the fund was charged $22,500 during the period ended March 31, 2011 for administration and fund accounting services.
26
At a Board Meeting of the Trust held on February 15-16, 2011, the Board of Trustees of the Trust terminated the agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon and, on behalf of the Trust, entered into a Fund Accounting and Administration Agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with Dreyfus, effective May 1, 2011, whereby Dreyfus will perform administrative, accounting and recordkeeping services for the fund. The fund has agreed to compensate Dreyfus for providing accounting services, administration, compliance monitoring, regulatory and shareholder reporting, as well as related facilities, equipment and clerical help.The fee is based on the fund’s average daily net assets and computed at the following annual rates: .10% of the first $500 million, .065% of the next $500 million and .02% in excess of $1 billion.
In addition, after applying any expense limitations or fee waivers that reduce the fees paid to Dreyfus for this service, Dreyfus has contractually agreed in writing to waive any remaining fees for this service to the extent that they exceed both Dreyfus’ costs in providing these services and a reasonable allocation of the costs incurred by Dreyfus and its affiliates related to the support and oversight of these services.
The fund also will reimburse Dreyfus for the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing this service for the fund.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing its shares at an annual rate of .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. During the period ended March 31, 2011, Class C shares were charged $931 pursuant to the Plan.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A and Class C shares pay the Distributor at the annual rate of .25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance
The Fund | 27 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
of shareholder accounts.The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services. The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended March 31, 2011, Class A and Class C shares were charged $246 and $310, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $818 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under cash management agreements for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $80 pursuant to the cash management agreements, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations. These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $2.
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $52,378 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $3,146 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: investment advisory fees
28
$15,865, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $155, shareholder services plan fees $96, custodian fees $25,038, chief compliance officer fees $1,957 and transfer agency per account fees $257, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $21,695.
(d) Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (as defined in the Act) receives $60,000 per annum, plus $7,000 per joint Board meeting of the Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc., The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Tax-Free Municipal Funds and Dreyfus Funds, Inc. (collectively, the “Board Group Open-End Funds”) attended, $2,500 for separate in-person committee meetings attended which are not held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board meeting and $2,000 for Board meetings and separate committee meetings attended that are conducted by telephone. The Board Group Open-End Funds also reimburse eachTrustee who is not an “interested person” of theTrust (as defined in the Act) for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. With respect to Board meetings, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional 25% of such compensation (with the exception of reimbursable amounts).The Chair of each of the Board’s committees, unless the Chair also serves as Chair of the Board, receives $1,350 per applicable committee meeting. In the event that there is an in-person joint committee meeting or a joint telephone meeting of the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund, the $2,500 or $2,000 fee, as applicable, is allocated between the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund.These fees and expenses are charged and allocated to each series based on net assets.
(e) A 2% redemption fee is charged and retained by the fund on certain shares redeemed within sixty days following the date of issuance, subject to exceptions, including redemptions made through the use of the fund’s exchange privilege. During the period ended March 31, 2011, redemption fees charged and retained by the fund amounted to $475.
The Fund | 29 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and forward contracts, during the period ended March 31, 2011, amounted to $5,378,411 and $6,511,697, respectively.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts: The fund enters into forward contracts in order to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on its foreign portfolio holdings, to settle foreign currency transactions or as a part of its investment strategy. When executing forward contracts, the fund is obligated to buy or sell a foreign currency at a specified rate on a certain date in the future. With respect to sales of forward contracts, the fund incurs a loss if the value of the contract increases between the date the forward contract is opened and the date the forward contract is closed.The fund realizes a gain if the value of the contract decreases between those dates.With respect to purchases of forward contracts, the fund incurs a loss if the value of the contract decreases between the date the forward contract is opened and the date the forward contract is closed.The fund realizes a gain if the value of the contract increases between those dates. Any realized gain or loss which occurred during the period is reflected in the Statement of Operations.The fund is exposed to foreign currency risk as a result of changes in value of underlying financial instruments. The fund is also exposed to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance on these forward contracts, which is typically limited to the unrealized gain on each open contract.The following summarizes open forward contracts at March 31, 2011:
Foreign | Unrealized | ||||
Forward Foreign Currency | Currency | Appreciation | |||
Exchange Contracts | Amounts | Cost ($) | Value ($) | (Depreciation) ($) | |
Purchases: | |||||
Taiwan Dollar, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 4,760,000 | 162,147 | 161,869 | (278) | |
Turkish Lira, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 7,414 | 4,798 | 4,801 | 3 |
30
Foreign | Unrealized | ||||
Forward Foreign Currency | Currency | Appreciation | |||
Exchange Contracts | Amounts | Proceeds ($) | Value ($) | (Depreciation) ($) | |
Sales: | |||||
Brazilian Real, | |||||
Expiring 4/5/2011 | 66,110 | 40,983 | 40,492 | 491 | |
South Korean Won, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 53,510,328 | 48,730 | 48,781 | (51) | |
Gross Unrealized | |||||
Appreciation | 494 | ||||
Gross Unrealized | |||||
Depreciation | (329) |
The following summarizes the average market value of derivatives outstanding for the period ended March 31, 2011:
Average Market Value ($) | |
Forward contracts | 49,829 |
At March 31, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $4,221,644, consisting of $4,380,364 gross unrealized appreciation and $158,720 gross unrealized depreciation.
At March 31, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
The Fund | 31 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) |
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on February 15 and 16, 2011, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory services (the “Agreement”).The Board also considered the approval of a new Fund Accounting and Administrative Services Agreement (the “Administration Agreement” and together with the Agreement, the “Agreements”) pursuant to which Dreyfus would provide the fund with administrative services.1 The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus. In considering the renewal of the Agreement and the approval of the Administration Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below.The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund.The Board members considered information previously provided to them in presentations from representatives of Dreyfus regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and representatives of Dreyfus confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including the distribution channel(s) for the fund.
The Board members also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also would provide oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and
32
assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructures.The Board also considered portfolio management’s brokerage policies and practices (including policies and practices regarding soft dollars) and the standards applied in seeking best execution.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio.The Board members reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended December 31, 2010, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Lipper as of September 30, 2010. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds.They also noted that performance generally should be considered over longer periods of time, although it is possible that long-term performance can be adversely affected by even one period of significant underperformance so that a single investment decision or theme has the ability to affect disproportionately long-term performance. The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was variously above, at and below the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s benchmark index.
The Fund | 33 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
The Board members also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons.They noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was at the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and the fund’s total expenses were at the Expense Group median and above the Expense Universe median.
A representative of Dreyfus noted that Dreyfus has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund, until February 1, 2012, so that annual direct fund operating expenses of Class A, Class C and Class I shares (excluding Rule 12b-1 fees, shareholder services fees, taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed 2.00%, 2.00% and 1.50%, respectively, of the fund’s average daily net assets. A representative of Dreyfus also noted that, in connection with the Administration Agreement and its related fees, Dreyfus contractually agreed to waive any fees to the extent that such fees exceed Dreyfus’ costs in providing the services contemplated under the Administration Agreement.
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the management or investment advisory fees (1) paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund and (2) paid to Dreyfus or the Dreyfus-affiliated primary employer of the fund’s primary portfolio manager for advising any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients.They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund, and the method
34
used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable, given the services rendered, or to be rendered, and service levels provided, or to be provided, by Dreyfus.The Board also noted the expense limitation arrangement and its effect on Dreyfus’ profitability. The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex. The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
The Board’s counsel stated that the Board members should consider the profitability analysis (1) as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreements bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Dreyfus representatives noted that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on a fund having achieved a substantial size with increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been stable or decreasing, the possibility that Dreyfus may have realized any economies of scale would be less. They also noted that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus funds complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted the soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreement and
The Fund | 35 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
the approval of the Administration Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
The Board generally was satisfied with the fund’s overall perfor- mance, in light of the considerations described above.
The Board concluded that the fees payable to Dreyfus were reason- able in light of the considerations described above.
The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreements and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year. In addition, it should be noted that the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of similar agreements during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board members and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board members’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years. The Board members determined that renewal of the Agreement and approval of the Administration Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
1 | Until May 1, 2011, administrative services were provided pursuant to a Custody,Administration and Accounting Services Agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon. |
36
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents | |
THE FUND | |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
11 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
12 | Statement of Operations |
13 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
15 | Financial Highlights |
18 | Notes to Financial Statements |
28 | Information About the Renewal of the Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | |
Back Cover |
Dreyfus/The Boston
Company Large Cap
Core Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus/The Boston Company Large Cap Core Fund, covering the six-month period from October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011.
Equities have fared quite well over the past year despite heightened market volatility in the spring and summer of 2010 stemming from a subpar U.S. economic recovery and developments in overseas markets. The U.S. stock market has rallied consistently since the fall, when a new round of monetary stimulus gave investors confidence that the economy was unlikely to slip back into recession. Market sectors that tend to be sensitive to macroeconomic changes performed particularly well, while traditionally defensive industry groups generally lagged market averages. Small- and midcap stocks typically gained more value, on average, than their larger, better established counterparts as investors looked forward to better business conditions for growing companies.
We currently expect the U.S. economy to gain a moderate degree of momentum over the remainder of 2011 in light of new fiscal stimulus measures, an improving labor market and benign inflationary pressures. The implications of this outlook are generally positive for stocks. However, in the wake of recent gains we believe that selectivity will become a more important determinant of investment success.We favor companies with higher growth potential, and we are also optimistic about the prospects of high-quality companies capable of generating dividend increases and share buybacks.As always, your financial advisor can help you align your investment portfolio with the opportunities and challenges that the future may have in store.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
April 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011, as provided by Sean P. Fitzgibbon and Jeffrey D. McGrew, Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended March 31, 2011, Dreyfus/The Boston Company Large Cap Core Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of 17.19%, Class C shares returned 16.79% and Class I shares returned 17.36%.1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index (“S&P 500 Index”), produced a total return of 17.31% for the same period.2
Improving economic conditions drove equities higher during the reporting period. Returns for the fund’s Class I shares were roughly in line with the S&P 500 Index, as relative strength in the information technology, industrials and health care sectors was balanced by shortfalls in the consumer discretionary, utilities and energy sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks long-term growth of capital.The fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large-cap companies that appear to be undervalued relative to underlying business fundamentals. The fund currently considers large-cap companies to be those with total market capitalizations, at the time of purchase, that are greater than the market capitalizations of companies in the bottom 5% of the capitalization range represented in the S&P 500 Index.The portfolio managers employ a core investment style that incorporates both growth and value criteria in managing the fund’s portfolio.The portfolio managers use a combination of quantitative and fundamental research to identify portfolio candidates.
Improved Economic Confidence Fueled a Market Rally
The economic recovery gained traction in the fall of 2010 after a new round of quantitative easing of monetary policy alleviated previous concerns. A more optimistic investment outlook was reinforced by subsequent improvements in employment and consumer spending, as well as by better-than-expected corporate earnings across a number of industry groups.
The Fund | 3 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
Later in the fall, the resolution of U.S. midterm elections and the passage of fiscally stimulative tax legislation lent further support to equities. However, the rally was interrupted in February when political unrest in the Middle East led to sharply higher energy prices, and again in March when Japan suffered a devastating earthquake and tsunami. Still, stocks generally proved resilient, ending the reporting period with significant gains, on average.
Stock Selections Produced Mixed Results
The fund’s top performer during the reporting period was energy producer Hess, which benefited from higher oil and gas prices. From a market sector perspective, our investment process proved particularly successful in the information technology sector, where we focused on emerging technological trends. For example, software developer Oracle and data warehousing specialist Teradata are participating in the shift among businesses to “cloud computing,” in which data and applications are stored with a provider and accessed over the Internet.We also found opportunities among companies—such as Apple and QUALCOMM—that are driving the growth of smartphones and tablet computers. Conversely, we avoided or maintained underweighted positions in companies that appear to have missed these trends, such as Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft and Cisco Systems. Finally, the fund achieved strong results through International Business Machines, which has solidified its global leadership position in technology consulting, and Alcatel-Lucent, which appears poised for a turnaround.
In the industrials sector, overweighted exposure and strong stock selection among machinery producers bolstered relative performance. We emphasized companies that tend to do well in the later stages of economic cycles, including heavy equipment maker Caterpillar and HVAC specialists Ingersoll-Rand and Thomas & Betts. Defense contractor Textron and engineering company Dover gained substantial value due to rising aircraft demand and a successful restructuring strategy, respectively. Among health care companies, the fund avoided weakness in Johnson & Johnson and Merck & Co., focusing instead on smaller drug developers such as King Pharmaceuticals, which was acquired by Pfizer during the reporting period.
4
Despite strong results from the health care sector overall, the fund’s greatest laggard was diabetes specialist Amalyn Pharmaceuticals, which suffered amid regulatory delays affecting a new product. In the consumer discretionary sector, unfortunate timing in the purchase of Ford Motor weighed on relative performance, Newell Rubbermaid encountered rising raw materials costs, and cruise company Carnival was hurt by higher fuel prices. Results in the utilities sector were undermined in the aftermath of Japan’s nuclear accident by nuclear power producers Entergy and Public Service Enterprise Group. Finally, the fund’s overall results in the energy sector modestly trailed their benchmark component when several exploration-and-production companies lagged market averages later in the reporting period.
Positioned for a More Selective Environment
Although we expect U.S. economic growth to persist, a number of risks have the potential to spark heightened market volatility. We believe that investors are likely to become more selective in such an environment. Consequently, we have positioned the fund for additional gains in corporate earnings in the consumer discretionary, health care and energy sectors.We have identified fewer companies meeting our investment criteria in the materials and consumer staples sectors.
April 15, 2011
Please note, the position in any security highlighted with italicized typeface was sold during the | |
reporting period. | |
Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment | |
style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the | |
fund’s prospectus. | |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares, or the applicable | |
contingent deferred sales charge imposed on redemptions in the case of Class C shares. Had these | |
charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future | |
results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be | |
worth more or less than their original cost.The fund’s returns reflect the absorption of certain fund | |
expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an agreement in effect through February 1, | |
2012, at which time it may be extended, terminated or modified. Had these expenses not been | |
absorbed, the fund’s returns would have been lower. | |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects the monthly reinvestment of dividends and, where |
applicable, capital gain distributions. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index | |
is a widely accepted, unmanaged index of U. S. stock market performance. Index return does not | |
reflect fees and expenses associated with operating a mutual fund. Investors cannot invest | |
directly in any index. |
The Fund | 5 |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus/The Boston Company Large Cap Core Fund from October 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||
assuming actual returns for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 6.23 | $ | 10.27 | $ | 4.88 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,171.90 | $ | 1,167.90 | $ | 1,173.60 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 5.79 | $ | 9.55 | $ | 4.53 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,019.20 | $ | 1,015.46 | $ | 1,020.44 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.15% for Class A, 1.90% for Class C, and .90% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks—99.4% | Shares | Value ($) | |
Consumer Discretionary—11.3% | |||
Autoliv | 2,420 | 179,637 | |
Carnival | 5,670 | 217,501 | |
DIRECTV, Cl. A | 7,360a | 344,448 | |
Ford Motor | 31,540a | 470,261 | |
Mattel | 11,780 | 293,675 | |
Newell Rubbermaid | 27,280 | 521,866 | |
News, Cl. A | 10,940 | 192,106 | |
Omnicom Group | 9,980 | 489,619 | |
Stanley Black & Decker | 1,990 | 152,434 | |
Time Warner | 7,600 | 271,320 | |
3,132,867 | |||
Consumer Staples—8.9% | |||
Energizer Holdings | 4,030a | 286,775 | |
Nestle, ADR | 5,440 | 312,691 | |
PepsiCo | 8,950 | 576,470 | |
Philip Morris International | 8,140 | 534,228 | |
Unilever, ADR | 20,740 | 635,059 | |
Walgreen | 3,210 | 128,849 | |
2,474,072 | |||
Energy—14.3% | |||
Alpha Natural Resources | 4,930a | 292,694 | |
Anadarko Petroleum | 4,120 | 337,510 | |
Apache | 2,240 | 293,261 | |
Cameron International | 2,550a | 145,605 | |
Chevron | 7,222 | 775,859 | |
ENSCO, ADR | 7,520 | 434,957 | |
Halliburton | 6,610 | 329,442 | |
Hess | 4,670 | 397,931 | |
National Oilwell Varco | 2,700 | 214,029 | |
Occidental Petroleum | 5,040 | 526,630 | |
Valero Energy | 7,620 | 227,228 | |
3,975,146 | |||
Exchange Traded Funds—.5% | |||
Standard & Poor’s Depository | |||
Receipts S&P 500 ETF Trust | 1,010 | 133,916 |
The Fund | 7 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | |
Financial—14.4% | |||
Aflac | 3,630 | 191,591 | |
American Express | 6,280 | 283,856 | |
Bank of America | 42,010 | 559,993 | |
Capital One Financial | 10,370 | 538,825 | |
Citigroup | 134,890a | 596,214 | |
Hartford Financial Services Group | 7,410 | 199,551 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 5,700 | 262,770 | |
Lincoln National | 12,400 | 372,496 | |
MetLife | 5,750 | 257,198 | |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 22,940 | 727,198 | |
3,989,692 | |||
Health Care—12.9% | |||
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions | 9,380a | 196,886 | |
CIGNA | 7,210 | 319,259 | |
Covidien | 6,737 | 349,920 | |
Dendreon | 3,120a | 116,782 | |
Gilead Sciences | 4,800a | 203,712 | |
HCA Holdings | 4,390a | 148,689 | |
Human Genome Sciences | 10,140a | 278,343 | |
McKesson | 5,070 | 400,784 | |
Pfizer | 47,070 | 955,992 | |
St. Jude Medical | 5,630 | 288,594 | |
Warner Chilcott, Cl. A | 6,040 | 140,611 | |
Zimmer Holdings | 2,930a | 177,353 | |
3,576,925 | |||
Industrial—11.0% | |||
Caterpillar | 4,950 | 551,182 | |
Cummins | 2,370 | 259,799 | |
Dover | 5,800 | 381,292 | |
General Electric | 32,800 | 657,640 | |
Ingersoll-Rand | 7,720 | 372,953 | |
Norfolk Southern | 3,650 | 252,836 | |
Textron | 9,430 | 258,288 | |
Thomas & Betts | 2,860a | 170,084 |
8
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | |
Industrial (continued) | |||
Tyco International | 3,657 | 163,724 | |
3,067,798 | |||
Materials—1.6% | |||
CF Industries Holdings | 920 | 125,847 | |
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. | 5,940 | 326,522 | |
452,369 | |||
Technology—19.2% | |||
Alcatel-Lucent, ADR | 41,830a | 243,032 | |
Amazon.com | 860a | 154,912 | |
Apple | 2,880a | 1,003,536 | |
BMC Software | 7,550a | 375,537 | |
Electronic Arts | 7,410a | 144,717 | |
EMC | 9,830a | 260,986 | |
Google, Cl. A | 770a | 451,382 | |
Informatica | 4,310a | 225,111 | |
International Business Machines | 5,220 | 851,225 | |
Motorola Mobility Holdings | 2,082a | 50,801 | |
Motorola Solutions | 2,364a | 105,647 | |
NetApp | 2,570a | 123,823 | |
Oracle | 19,780 | 660,059 | |
QUALCOMM | 8,620 | 472,635 | |
Teradata | 3,531a | 179,022 | |
5,302,425 | |||
Telecommunication | |||
Services—2.4% | |||
AT&T | 21,720 | 664,632 | |
Utilities—2.9% | |||
American Electric Power | 4,150 | 145,831 | |
Entergy | 2,970 | 199,614 | |
NextEra Energy | 3,540 | 195,125 | |
Public Service Enterprise Group | 8,820 | 277,918 | |
818,488 | |||
Total Common Stocks | |||
(cost $22,451,565) | 27,588,330 |
The Fund | 9 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued) | |||
Other Investment—.0% | Shares | Value ($) | |
Registered Investment Company; | |||
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | |||
Plus Money Market Fund | |||
(cost $10,999) | 10,999b | 10,999 | |
Total Investments (cost $22,462,564) | 99.4% | 27,599,329 | |
Cash and Receivables (Net) | .6% | 179,697 | |
Net Assets | 100.0% | 27,779,026 | |
ADR—American Depository Receipts | |||
a Non-income producing security. | |||
b Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | |||
Value (%) | Value (%) | ||
Technology | 19.2 | Utilities | 2.9 |
Financial | 14.4 | Telecommunication Services | 2.4 |
Energy | 14.3 | Materials | 1.6 |
Health Care | 12.9 | Exchange Traded Funds | .5 |
Consumer Discretionary | 11.3 | Money Market Investment | .0 |
Industrial | 11.0 | ||
Consumer Staples | 8.9 | 99.4 | |
† Based on net assets. | |||
See notes to financial statements. |
10
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Cost | Value | |||
Assets ($): | ||||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments: | ||||
Unaffiliated issuers | 22,451,565 | 27,588,330 | ||
Affiliated issuers | 10,999 | 10,999 | ||
Cash | 79,034 | |||
Receivable for investment securities sold | 1,208,749 | |||
Dividends and interest receivable | 22,466 | |||
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | 1,210 | |||
Prepaid expenses | 25,550 | |||
28,936,338 | ||||
Liabilities ($): | ||||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 18,571 | |||
Bank note payable | 1,100,000 | |||
Interest payable—Note 2 | 132 | |||
Accrued expenses | 38,609 | |||
1,157,312 | ||||
Net Assets ($) | 27,779,026 | |||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||
Paid-in capital | 35,257,680 | |||
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | 96,123 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (12,711,542) | |||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 5,136,765 | |||
Net Assets ($) | 27,779,026 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share | ||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||
Net Assets ($) | 312,490 | 33,876 | 27,432,660 | |
Shares Outstanding | 8,562 | 931.22 | 750,220 | |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 36.50 | 36.38 | 36.57 | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 11 |
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends: | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 260,304 | |
Affiliated issuers | 121 | |
Total Income | 260,425 | |
Expenses: | ||
Investment advisory fee—Note 3(a) | 79,374 | |
Accounting and administration fee—Note 3(a) | 28,500 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 27,202 | |
Auditing fees | 26,031 | |
Registration fees | 18,528 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 16,528 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 2,103 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 1,062 | |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 433 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 89 | |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 42 | |
Miscellaneous | 7,791 | |
Total Expenses | 207,683 | |
Less—reduction in investment advisory fee due to undertaking—Note 3(a) | (64,053) | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(c) | (3) | |
Net Expenses | 143,627 | |
Investment Income—Net | 116,798 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 3,569,738 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 1,464,504 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 5,034,242 | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 5,151,040 | |
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 116,798 | 257,087 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 3,569,738 | 3,595,387 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 1,464,504 | 200,923 | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | 5,151,040 | 4,053,397 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net: | ||||
Class A Shares | (447) | (50) | ||
Class I Shares | (275,220) | (131,718) | ||
Total Dividends | (275,667) | (131,768) | ||
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Class A Shares | 251,257 | 30,030 | ||
Class C Shares | 22,020 | — | ||
Class I Shares | 2,184,506 | 3,840,994 | ||
Dividends reinvested: | ||||
Class A Shares | 339 | 8 | ||
Class I Shares | 195,227 | 76,544 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Class A Shares | (120) | — | ||
Class C Shares | (6,234) | — | ||
Class I Shares | (11,070,359) | (11,133,307) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | ||||
Beneficial Interest Transactions | (8,423,364) | (7,185,731) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (3,547,991) | (3,264,102) | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 31,327,017 | 34,591,119 | ||
End of Period | 27,779,026 | 31,327,017 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | 96,123 | 254,992 |
The Fund | 13 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Class A | ||||
Shares sold | 6,991 | 994 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 10 | —a | ||
Shares redeemed | (4) | — | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 6,997 | 994 | ||
Class C | ||||
Shares sold | 621 | — | ||
Shares redeemed | (175) | — | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 446 | — | ||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 63,161 | 129,178 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 5,777 | 2,637 | ||
Shares redeemed | (313,752) | (373,140) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (244,814) | (241,325) | ||
a Amount represents less than 1 share. | ||||
See notes to financial statements. |
14
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following tables describe the performance for each share class for the fiscal periods indicated.All information (except portfolio turnover rate) reflects financial results for a single fund share.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||
Class A Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | |||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 31.35 | 27.93 | 20.60 | |||
Investment Operations: | ||||||
Investment income—netb | .07 | .16 | .09 | |||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 5.30 | 3.35 | 7.43 | |||
Total from Investment Operations | 5.37 | 3.51 | 7.52 | |||
Distributions: | ||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.22) | (.09) | (.19) | |||
Net asset value, end of period | 36.50 | 31.35 | 27.93 | |||
Total Return (%)c | 17.19d | 12.58 | 36.67d | |||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 2.13e | 1.43 | 4.43e | |||
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.15e | 1.15 | 1.15e | |||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||
to average net assets | .44e | .53 | .74e | |||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 34.51d | 82.28 | 116.21 | |||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 312 | 49 | 16 |
a | From March 31, 2009 (commencement of initial offering) to September 30, 2009. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 15 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
Six Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||
Class C Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | |||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 31.14 | 27.87 | 20.60 | |||
Investment Operations: | ||||||
Investment income (loss)—netb | (.06) | (.06) | .00c | |||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 5.30 | 3.33 | 7.41 | |||
Total from Investment Operations | 5.24 | 3.27 | 7.41 | |||
Distributions: | ||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | — | — | (.14) | |||
Net asset value, end of period | 36.38 | 31.14 | 27.87 | |||
Total Return (%)d | 16.79e | 11.73 | 36.16e | |||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 2.07f | 2.40 | 3.45f | |||
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.90f | 1.90 | 1.90f | |||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||
(loss) to average net assets | (.32)f | (.19) | .01f | |||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 34.51e | 82.28 | 116.21 | |||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 34 | 15 | 14 |
a | From March 31, 2009 (commencement of initial offering) to September 30, 2009. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
d | Exclusive of sales charge. |
e | Not annualized. |
f | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
Class I Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, | ||||||||||||
beginning of period | 31.42 | 27.95 | 30.39 | 43.28 | 37.58 | 39.57 | ||||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||
Investment income—netb | .13 | .24 | .34 | .43 | .43 | .36 | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 5.30 | 3.35 | (2.38) | (9.32)c | 7.01c | 3.22 | ||||||
Total from Investment Operations | 5.43 | 3.59 | (2.04) | (8.89) | 7.44 | 3.58 | ||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||
Dividends from | ||||||||||||
investment income—net | (.28) | (.12) | (.40) | (.53) | (.33) | (.39) | ||||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||||
gain on investments | — | — | — | (3.47) | (1.41) | (5.18) | ||||||
Total Distributions | (.28) | (.12) | (.40) | (4.00) | (1.74) | (5.57) | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period | 36.57 | 31.42 | 27.95 | 30.39 | 43.28 | 37.58 | ||||||
Total Return (%) | 17.36d | 12.87 | (6.43) | (22.41) | 20.27 | 9.84 | ||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.30e | 1.23 | 1.23 | .84 | .80f | .99f | ||||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .90e | .90 | .91 | .84 | .80f | .90f | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .74e | .81 | 1.43 | 1.17 | 1.05 | .98 | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 34.51d | 82.28 | 116.21 | 61 | 59g | 103g | ||||||
Net Assets, end of period | ||||||||||||
($ x 1,000) | 27,433 | 31,263 | 34,562 | 59,996 | 122,591 | 93,745 |
a | The fund commenced offering three classes of shares on March 31, 2009.The existing shares were redesignated as |
Class I shares. | |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amount includes litigation proceeds received by the fund amounting to $.02 and $.04 per share for the years ended |
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. | |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
f | For the period October 1, 2006 to September 19, 2007 and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, the ratios |
include the fund’s share of the TBC Large Cap Core Portfolio’s (the “Portfolio”) allocated expenses. | |
g | On September 19, 2007, the fund, which owned 100% of the Portfolio on such date, withdrew entirely from the |
Portfolio and received the Portfolio’s securities and cash in exchange for its interest in the Portfolio. Effective | |
September 20, 2007, the fund began investing directly in securities. Portfolio turnover represents combined investment | |
activity of the fund and the Portfolio for the year ended September 30, 2007.The amount shown for 2006 is the | |
ratio for the Portfolio. | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus/The Boston Company Large Cap Core Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Investment Funds (the “Trust”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering eleven series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term growth of capital. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of NewYork Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares. The fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class C, and Class I. Class A shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class I shares are sold primarily to bank trust departments and other financial service providers (including The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus), acting on behalf of customers having a qualified trust or investment account or relationship at such institution, and bear no distribution or shareholder services fees. Class I shares are offered without a front-end sales charge or CDSC. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to, the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
As of March 31, 2011, MBC Investments Corp., an indirect subsidiary of BNY Mellon, held 485 Class A and Class C shares of the fund.
18
The Trust accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market),but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in
The Fund | 19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
accordance with the procedures approved by the Board ofTrustees. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant ADRs and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Trustees, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
20
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of March 31, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
Level 2—Other | Level 3— | |||
Level 1— | Significant | Significant | ||
Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | ||
Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |
Assets ($) | ||||
Investments in Securities: | ||||
Equity Securities— | ||||
Domestic† | 25,649,038 | — | — | 25,649,038 |
Equity Securities— | ||||
Foreign† | 1,805,376 | — | — | 1,805,376 |
Mutual Funds/ | ||||
Exchange Traded | ||||
Funds | 144,915 | — | — | 144,915 |
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at March 31, 2011.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
The Fund | 21 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Investing in foreign markets may involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in the U.S. These risks include revaluation of currencies, high rates of inflation, repatriation restrictions on income and capital, and adverse political and economic developments. Moreover, securities issued in these markets may be less liquid, subject to government ownership controls and delayed settlements, and their prices may be more volatile than those of comparable securities in the U.S.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended March 31, 2011 were as follows:
Affiliated | |||||||
Investment | Value | Value | Net | ||||
Company | 9/30/2010 | ($) | Purchases ($) | Sales ($) | 3/31/2011 | ($) | Assets (%) |
Dreyfus | |||||||
Institutional | |||||||
Preferred | |||||||
Plus Money | |||||||
Market Fund | 55,809 | 3,273,752 | 3,318,562 | 10,999 | .0 |
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
22
As of and during the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $16,082,170 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to September 30, 2010. If not applied, $6,566,434 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2017 and $9,515,736 expires in fiscal 2018.
Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years.As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryovers may be more likely to expire unused.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 was as follows: ordinary income $131,768.The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion
The Fund | 23 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing.
The average amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facilities during the period ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $61,000 with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.43%.
NOTE 3—Investment Advisory Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Manager, the investment advisory fee is computed at the annual rate of .50% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
The Manager has agreed, until February 1, 2012, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of none of the classes (excluding Rule 12b-1 fees, shareholder services fees, taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and extraordinary expenses) exceed .90% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets. The reduction in investment advisory fee, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $64,053 during the period ended March 31, 2011.
During the period, the Trust had an agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, pursuant to whichThe Bank of NewYork Mellon provided administration and fund accounting services for the fund. For these services the fund pays The Bank of NewYork Mellon a fixed fee plus asset and transaction based fees, as well as out-of-pocket expenses. Pursuant to this agreement, the fund was charged $28,500 during the period ended March 31, 2011 for administration and fund accounting services.
At a Board Meeting of the Trust held on February 15-16, 2011, the Board of Trustees of the Trust terminated the agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon and, on behalf of the Trust, entered into a Fund Accounting and Administration Agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with Dreyfus, effective May 1, 2011, whereby Dreyfus will perform administrative, accounting and recordkeeping services for
24
the fund. The fund has agreed to compensate Dreyfus for providing accounting services, administration, compliance monitoring, regulatory and shareholder reporting, as well as related facilities, equipment and clerical help.The fee is based on the fund’s average daily net assets and computed at the following annual rates: .06% of the first $500 million, .04% of the next $500 million and .02% in excess of $1 billion.
In addition, after applying any expense limitations or fee waivers that reduce the fees paid to Dreyfus for this service, Dreyfus has contractually agreed in writing to waive any remaining fees for this service to the extent that they exceed both Dreyfus’ costs in providing these services and a reasonable allocation of the costs incurred by Dreyfus and its affiliates related to the support and oversight of these services.
The fund also will reimburse Dreyfus for the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing this service for the fund.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing its shares at an annual rate of .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. During the period ended March 31, 2011, Class C shares were charged $89 pursuant to the Plan.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A and Class C shares pay the Distributor at the annual rate of .25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts.The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services. The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended March 31, 2011, Class A and Class C shares were charged $159 and $30, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The Fund | 25 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $710 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under cash management agreements for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $99 pursuant to the cash management agreements, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations. These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $3.
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $16,528 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $3,146 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due toThe Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: investment advisory fees $12,209, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $22, shareholder services plan fees $72, custodian fees $15,000, chief compliance officer fees $1,957 and transfer agency per account fees $6,595, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $17,284.
(d) Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (as defined in the Act) receives $60,000 per annum, plus $7,000 per joint Board meeting of the Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc., The
26
Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Tax-Free Municipal Funds and Dreyfus Funds, Inc. (collectively, the “Board Group Open-End Funds”) attended, $2,500 for separate in-person committee meetings attended which are not held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board meeting and $2,000 for Board meetings and separate committee meetings attended that are conducted by telephone. The Board Group Open-End Funds also reimburse eachTrustee who is not an “interested person” of theTrust (as defined in the Act) for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. With respect to Board meetings, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional 25% of such compensation (with the exception of reimbursable amounts).The Chair of each of the Board’s committees, unless the Chair also serves as Chair of the Board, receives $1,350 per applicable committee meeting. In the event that there is an in-person joint committee meeting or a joint telephone meeting of the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund, the $2,500 or $2,000 fee, as applicable, is allocated between the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund. The Trust’s portion of these fees and expenses are charged and allocated to each series based on net assets. Amounts required to be paid by theTrust directly to the non-interested Trustees, that would be applied to offset a portion of the management fee payable to the Manager, are in fact paid directly by the Manager to the non-interested Trustees.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended March 31, 2011, amounted to $10,792,848 and $19,472,066, respectively.
At March 31, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $5,136,765, consisting of $5,484,885 gross unrealized appreciation and $348,120 gross unrealized depreciation.
At March 31, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
The Fund | 27 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) |
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on February 15 and 16, 2011, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory services (the “Agreement”).The Board also considered the approval of a new Fund Accounting and Administrative Services Agreement (the “Administration Agreement” and together with the Agreement, the “Agreements”) pursuant to which Dreyfus would provide the fund with administrative services.1 The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus. In considering the renewal of the Agreement and the approval of the Administration Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below.The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund.The Board members considered information previously provided to them in presentations from representatives of Dreyfus regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and representatives of Dreyfus confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including the distribution channel(s) for the fund.
The Board members also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also would provide oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and adminis-
28
tration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements. The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructures.The Board also considered portfolio management’s brokerage policies and practices (including policies and practices regarding soft dollars) and the standards applied in seeking best execution.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio.The Board members reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended December 31, 2010, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Lipper as of September 30, 2010. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds.The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was above the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians for each of the various periods, and the fund ranked first in the Performance Group for the one-year and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2010 and was ranked in the first quartile of the Performance Group in all periods. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s benchmark index.
The Fund | 29 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
The Board members also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. They noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and the fund’s total expenses were below the Expense Group median and at the Expense Universe median.
A representative of Dreyfus noted that Dreyfus has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund, until February 1, 2012, so that annual direct fund operating expenses (excluding Rule 12b-1 fees, shareholder services fees, taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed .90% of the fund’s average daily net assets.A representative of Dreyfus also noted that, in connection with the Administration Agreement and its related fees, Dreyfus contractually agreed to waive any fees to the extent that such fees exceed Dreyfus’ costs in providing the services contemplated under the Administration Agreement.
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the management or investment advisory fees (1) paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund and (2) paid to Dreyfus or the Dreyfus-affiliated primary employer of the fund’s primary portfolio manager for advising any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients.They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
30
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable, given the services rendered, or to be rendered, and service levels provided, or to be provided, by Dreyfus.The Board also noted the expense limitation arrangement and its effect on Dreyfus’ profitability. The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex. The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
The Board’s counsel stated that the Board members should consider the profitability analysis (1) as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreements bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Dreyfus representatives noted that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on a fund having achieved a substantial size with increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been stable or decreasing, the possibility that Dreyfus may have realized any economies of scale would be less. They also noted that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus funds complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The
The Fund | 31 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted the soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreement and approval of the Administration Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
The Board was satisfied with the fund’s performance, in light of the considerations described above.
The Board concluded that the fees payable to Dreyfus were rea- sonable in light of the considerations described above.
The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreements and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year. In addition, it should be noted that the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of similar agreements during which
32
lengthy discussions took place between the Board members and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board members’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years. The Board members determined that renewal of the Agreement and approval of the Administration Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
1 | Until May 1, 2011, administrative services were provided pursuant to a Custody,Administration and Accounting Services Agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon. |
The Fund | 33 |
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents | |
THE FUND | |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
12 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
13 | Statement of Operations |
14 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
15 | Financial Highlights |
16 | Notes to Financial Statements |
25 | Information About the Renewal of the Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | |
Back Cover |
Dreyfus/The Boston
Company Small Cap
Growth Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
This semiannual report for Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Growth Fund covers the six-month period from October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011.
Equities throughout the world fared well over the past six months. International stock markets have rallied broadly since the fall of 2010, when new rounds of monetary stimulus from U.S. and foreign central banks gave investors confidence that the global economy was unlikely to slip back into recession.As a result, developed markets rebounded strongly from relatively depressed levels, while emerging markets added more moderately to their previous gains. Although political uprisings in the Middle East and the disasters in Japan injected some uncertainty into the investment climate, these events do not appear to have derailed the global market rally. Market sectors that tend to be sensitive to macroeconomic changes performed particularly well as commodity prices climbed and investors looked forward to better business conditions.
We currently expect most developed and emerging markets to adopt less stimulative fiscal and monetary policies over the remainder of 2011 as the global economy reaches the middle stages of its cycle. Moreover, in the wake of recent gains we believe that selectivity will become a more important determinant of investment success in international markets.We favor the core of Europe over more peripheral members of the European Union, and while we expect the emerging markets to grow faster than developed markets, the growth rate in China seems likely to moderate. As always, your financial advisor can help you align your investment portfolio with the opportunities and challenges that 2011 has in store.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
April 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011, as provided by B. Randall Watts and P. Hans Von Der Luft, Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended March 31, 2011, Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Growth Fund produced a total return of 25.61%.1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index (the “Index”), produced a total return of 27.93% for the same period.2
Improving economic conditions drove small-cap stocks higher during the reporting period. Although the fund participated to a significant degree in the market’s gains, its returns lagged the benchmark as shortfalls in the financials, information technology and consumer discretionary sectors offset above-average results in the energy and materials sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks long-term growth of capital.To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of small-cap U.S. companies with total market capitalizations, at the time of purchase, equal to or less than that of the largest company in the Index. When choosing stocks, we seek to identify high-quality, small-cap companies that are experiencing or are expected to experience rapid current or expected earnings or revenue growth.We employ fundamental research to identify companies with attractive characteristics, such as strong business and competitive positions, solid cash flows and balance sheets, high-quality management and high sustainable growth. We also may invest in companies that our research indicates will experience accelerating revenues and expanding operating margins.
Improved Economic Confidence Fueled a Market Rally
The U.S. economic recovery gained traction in the fall of 2010 after the Federal Reserve Board embarked on a new round of quantitative easing of monetary policy, helping to alleviate investors’ concerns regarding a possible return to recession.A more optimistic investment outlook was
The Fund | 3 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
reinforced by subsequent improvements in U.S. employment and consumer spending, as well as by better-than-expected corporate earnings across a number of industry groups.
Later in the fall, the resolution of U.S. midterm elections and the passage of fiscally stimulative tax legislation lent further support to the stock market. However, the market rally was interrupted in February when political unrest in the Middle East led to sharply higher energy prices, and again in March when Japan suffered a devastating earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster. Still, stocks generally proved resilient, rebounding quickly and ending the reporting period with significant gains, on average. Small-cap stocks produced substantially higher returns than their large-cap counterparts over the reporting period, and growth stocks generally outperformed value-oriented stocks.
Stock Selections Produced Mixed Results
The fund’s relative performance in the financials sector was undermined by mortgage services provider Altisource Portfolio Solutions, which exhibited lower-than-expected EPS results during the reporting period. In addition, consumer finance company Green Dot suffered due to concerns regarding proposed government regulations targeting prepaid debit cards.
In the information technology sector, marketing technology solutions provider Acxiom declined following changes in its management team and reduced quarterly earnings guidance. Electronic components maker Sanmina-SCI was hurt by the resignation of its chief financial officer, and the company issued reduced earnings guidance. Among consumer discretionary companies, general merchandiser 99 Cents Only Stores saw lower sales during the 2010 holiday season due to weather disruptions.
The fund achieved better relative results in the energy sector, which generally benefited from rising commodity prices. Independent exploration-and-production company Gulfport Energy moved higher as the company’s entry into the Utica shale in Ohio and gas discovery in Thailand provided strong growth opportunities for the stock. Oil States International advanced due to strong results from its remote site accommodations business unit after a strategic acquisition. Pioneer Drilling achieved better-than-expected revenues and profit margins amid
4
increased oil and gas production in the United States and Columbia. In the materials sector, successful stock selections included Schnitzer Steel Industries, which increased sales and revenues as commodity prices climbed. Improved production and utilization rates at Horsehead Holding enabled the mining company to boost sales of zinc and nickel.
Positioned for a More Selective Environment
We expect the U.S. economic recovery to continue, which could lead to increased hiring and higher corporate earnings in a number of industries.At the same time, we are aware of potential headwinds that could dampen economic growth and earnings, including ongoing geopolitical instability and the impact of intensifying inflationary pressures on input costs for some businesses.We believe that investors are likely to become more selective in such an environment as they focus more intently on individual companies’ underlying business fundamentals and place less emphasis on macroeconomic developments.
Consequently, we have positioned the fund for additional gains in the energy sector, where we believe commodity prices are likely to remain elevated amid rising demand for a limited supply of crude oil.We have identified fewer companies meeting our investment criteria in the consumer discretionary sector.
April 15, 2011
Please note, the position in any security highlighted in italicized typeface was sold during the | |
reporting period. | |
Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment | |
style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the | |
fund’s prospectus. | |
The prices of small company stocks tend to be more volatile than the prices of large company | |
stocks, mainly because these companies have less established and more volatile earnings histories. | |
They also tend to be less liquid than larger company stocks. | |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid. Past performance is no |
guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, | |
fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. | |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — The Russell 2000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index, |
which measures the performance of those Russell 2000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios | |
and higher forecasted growth values.The total return figure cited for this index assumes change in | |
security prices and reinvestment of dividends, but does not reflect the costs of managing a mutual | |
fund. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. |
The Fund | 5 |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Growth Fund from October 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||
assuming actual returns for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 5.34 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,256.10 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended March 31, 2011
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 4.78 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,020.19 |
Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .95% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks—98.1% | Shares | Value ($) |
Consumer Discretionary—15.2% | ||
Aaron’s | 106,920a | 2,711,491 |
Buffalo Wild Wings | 12,590 a,b | 685,274 |
Cheesecake Factory | 45,320a,b | 1,363,679 |
Citi Trends | 80,660b | 1,797,911 |
Interface, Cl. A | 144,070 | 2,663,854 |
Interval Leisure Group | 69,010 b | 1,128,313 |
Jarden | 48,200a a | 1,714,474 |
JOS. A. Bank Clothiers | 30,503 a,b | 1,551,993 |
Lions Gate Entertainment | 273,030b | 1,706,437 |
Papa John’s International | 40,670 a,b | 1,288,019 |
Regis | 125,250a | 2,221,935 |
Select Comfort | 205,740a,b | 2,481,224 |
Stage Stores | 44,500a | 855,290 |
Tractor Supply | 33,050 | 1,978,373 |
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance | 34,950a,b | 1,682,144 |
VistaPrint | 52,470b | 2,723,193 |
Vitamin Shoppe | 65,760a,b | 2,224,661 |
Warnaco Group | 64,470a,b | 3,687,039 |
34,465,304 | ||
Consumer Staples—3.0% | ||
Casey’s General Stores | 41,440a,b | 1,616,160 |
Darling International | 127,800 b | 1,964,286 |
Inter Parfums | 110,870a,b | 2,052,204 |
United Natural Foods | 25,010a,b | 1,120,948 |
6,753,598 | ||
Energy—9.2% | ||
Bill Barrett | 70,570a,b | 2,816,449 |
Brigham Exploration | 48,220 a,b | 1,792,820 |
Cal Dive International | 177,300 b | 1,237,554 |
Carrizo Oil & Gas | 87,736a,b | 3,240,090 |
Dril-Quip | 23,460b | 1,854,044 |
Global Industries | 158,570a,b | 1,552,400 |
Gulfport Energy | 76,810a,b | 2,776,681 |
Northern Oil and Gas | 39,110a,b | 1,044,237 |
The Fund | 7 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Energy (continued) | ||
Oil States International | 44,940 a,b | 3,421,732 |
Pioneer Drilling | 92,170b | 1,271,946 |
21,007,953 | ||
Financial—8.8% | ||
Brookline Bancorp | 65,050 | 684,976 |
Dime Community Bancshares | 105,320a | 1,554,523 |
Green Dot, Cl. A | 22,930a | 983,926 |
Hatteras Financial | 38,410 | 1,080,089 |
Hersha Hospitality Trust | 172,480 a,c | 1,024,531 |
MarketAxess Holdings | 91,290 | 2,209,218 |
MFA Financial | 142,980c | 1,172,436 |
Portfolio Recovery Associates | 38,480a,b | 3,275,802 |
Potlatch | 71,090a,c | 2,857,818 |
Resolute Energy | 74,270a,b | 1,347,258 |
Signature Bank | 20,070a,b | 1,131,948 |
World Acceptance | 40,420a,b | 2,635,384 |
19,957,909 | ||
Health Care—17.2% | ||
Alexion Pharmaceuticals | 25,390 a,b | 2,505,485 |
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions | 84,020 b | 1,763,580 |
Analogic | 41,650a | 2,355,307 |
Catalyst Health Solutions | 38,880 a,b | 2,174,558 |
Centene | 55,170a,b | 1,819,507 |
Chemed | 33,420 | 2,226,106 |
Cooper | 49,010a | 3,403,745 |
Exact Sciences | 52,960b | 389,786 |
Exelixis | 121,480a,b | 1,372,724 |
HeartWare International | 11,230 a,b | 960,502 |
MAP Pharmaceuticals | 121,620a,b | 1,677,140 |
Masimo | 33,620a | 1,112,822 |
PerkinElmer | 87,090 | 2,287,854 |
Pharmasset | 25,560a,b | 2,011,828 |
Salix Pharmaceuticals | 67,150 a,b | 2,352,265 |
SXC Health Solutions | 54,540b | 2,988,792 |
8
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | |
Health Care (continued) | |||
Theravance | 62,970a,b | 1,525,133 | |
Thermo Fisher Scientific | 33,480b | 1,859,814 | |
United Therapeutics | 18,530a,b | 1,241,881 | |
ViroPharma | 64,990a,b | 1,293,301 | |
Volcano | 72,403a,b | 1,853,517 | |
39,175,647 | |||
Industrial—14.8% | |||
American Reprographics | 52,310a,b | 541,408 | |
Columbus McKinnon | 63,310a,b | 1,168,703 | |
Corporate Executive Board | 54,620a | 2,205,009 | |
Crane | 51,830 | 2,510,127 | |
EMCOR Group | 59,580b | 1,845,193 | |
EnerSys | 83,950a,b | 3,337,012 | |
EnPro Industries | 40,160a,b | 1,458,611 | |
Exponent | 45,760b | 2,041,354 | |
GeoEye | 43,050b | 1,790,019 | |
Interline Brands | 79,930b | 1,630,572 | |
Kforce | 204,600a,b | 3,744,180 | |
Middleby | 19,880a,b | 1,853,214 | |
Mueller Industries | 72,370a | 2,650,189 | |
Old Dominion Freight Line | 33,820b | 1,186,744 | |
Taleo, Cl. A | 61,410a,b | 2,189,267 | |
Teledyne Technologies | 46,935b | 2,427,009 | |
Werner Enterprises | 44,430a | 1,176,062 | |
33,754,673 | |||
Materials—3.4% | |||
AMCOL International | 45,950a | 1,653,281 | |
Arch Chemicals | 51,590a | 2,145,628 | |
Horsehead Holding | 82,180b | 1,401,169 | |
Intrepid Potash | 74,620a,b | 2,598,268 | |
7,798,346 | |||
Technology—25.5% | |||
Advanced Energy Industries | 135,920b | 2,222,292 | |
Blackboard | 40,490a,b | 1,467,358 |
The Fund | 9 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | |
Technology (continued) | |||
CACI International, Cl. A | 61,660a,b | 3,780,991 | |
Commvault Systems | 90,690b | 3,616,717 | |
Constant Contact | 95,990a,b | 3,350,051 | |
Fair Isaac | 56,630a | 1,790,074 | |
Harmonic | 508,810a,b | 4,772,638 | |
Ixia | 28,290a,b | 449,245 | |
KEMET | 125,530b | 1,861,610 | |
MAXIMUS | 25,300a | 2,053,601 | |
Mellanox Technologies | 41,310b | 1,042,251 | |
Netgear | 93,350b | 3,028,274 | |
NetScout Systems | 103,090a,b | 2,816,419 | |
OmniVision Technologies | 106,520a,b | 3,784,656 | |
PMC-Sierra | 140,100a,b | 1,050,750 | |
QLogic | 110,270a,b | 2,045,508 | |
Quality Systems | 17,270a | 1,439,282 | |
Quest Software | 61,830b | 1,569,864 | |
Rackspace Hosting | 45,830a,b | 1,963,816 | |
Rovi | 12,723a,b | 682,589 | |
Sanmina-SCI | 116,990b | 1,311,458 | |
ShoreTel | 146,100b | 1,202,403 | |
SuccessFactors | 57,830a,b | 2,260,575 | |
Triquint Semiconductor | 235,540a,b | 3,040,821 | |
Ultratech | 72,660b | 2,136,204 | |
VeriFone Holdings | 29,850a,b | 1,640,258 | |
Vocus | 64,830a,b | 1,676,504 | |
58,056,209 | |||
Telecommunication Services—1.0% | |||
Aruba Networks | 65,670a,b | 2,222,273 | |
Total Common Stocks | |||
(cost $173,456,863) | 223,191,912 |
10
Other Investment—2.0% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | ||||
Plus Money Market Fund | ||||
(cost $4,443,340) | 4,443,340 | d | 4,443,340 | |
Investment of Cash Collateral | ||||
for Securities Loaned—24.7% | ||||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Cash | ||||
Advantage Fund | ||||
(cost $56,253,265) | 56,253,265 | d | 56,253,265 | |
Total Investments (cost $234,153,468) | 124.8 | % | 283,888,517 | |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (24.8 | %) | (56,472,200 | ) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | 227,416,317 |
a Security, or portion thereof, on loan.At March 31, 2011, the value of the fund’s securities on loan was |
$55,054,698 and the value of the collateral held by the fund was $56,253,265. |
b Non-income producing security. |
c Investment in real estate investment trust. |
d Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | |||
Value (%) | Value (%) | ||
Money Market Investments | 26.7 | Financial | 8.8 |
Technology | 25.5 | Materials | 3.4 |
Health Care | 17.2 | Consumer Staples | 3.0 |
Consumer Discretionary | 15.2 | Telecommunication Services | 1.0 |
Industrial | 14.8 | ||
Energy | 9.2 | 124.8 | |
† Based on net assets. | |||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 11 |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Cost | Value | ||
Assets ($): | |||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments (including | |||
securities on loan, valued at $55,054,698)—Note 1(b): | |||
Unaffiliated issuers | 173,456,863 | 223,191,912 | |
Affiliated issuers | 60,696,605 | 60,696,605 | |
Cash | 126,071 | ||
Receivable for investment securities sold | 4,713,716 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 84,742 | ||
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | 27,668 | ||
Prepaid expenses | 10,959 | ||
288,851,673 | |||
Liabilities ($): | |||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(b) | 179,829 | ||
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(b) | 56,253,265 | ||
Payable for investment securities purchased | 4,337,873 | ||
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | 613,753 | ||
Accrued expenses | 50,636 | ||
61,435,356 | |||
Net Assets ($) | 227,416,317 | ||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | |||
Paid-in capital | 187,287,675 | ||
Accumulated Investment (loss)—net | (148,601) | ||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (9,457,806) | ||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | |||
(depreciation) on investments | 49,735,049 | ||
Net Assets ($) | 227,416,317 | ||
Class I Shares Outstanding | |||
(unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest authorized) | 3,797,175 | ||
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($) | 59.89 | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends: | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 841,728 | |
Affiliated issuers | 3,186 | |
Income from securities lending—Note 1(b) | 66,086 | |
Total Income | 911,000 | |
Expenses: | ||
Investment advisory fee—Note 3(a) | 897,998 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(b) | 56,458 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(b) | 34,392 | |
Professional fees | 34,259 | |
Accounting and administration fees—Note 3(a) | 22,500 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(c) | 7,892 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 6,891 | |
Registration fees | 3,151 | |
Miscellaneous | 5,935 | |
Total Expenses | 1,069,476 | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(b) | (15) | |
Net Expenses | 1,069,461 | |
Investment (Loss)—Net | (158,461) | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 36,917,352 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 14,412,970 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 51,330,322 | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 51,171,861 | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 13 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010a | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment (loss)—net | (158,461) | (744,979) | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 36,917,352 | 36,441,395 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 14,412,970 | (12,492,874) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | 51,171,861 | 23,203,542 | ||
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold | 8,125,232 | 14,174,094 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed | (51,024,585) | (117,797,097) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | ||||
Beneficial Interest Transactions | (42,899,353) | (103,623,003) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 8,272,508 | (80,419,461) | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 219,143,809 | 299,563,270 | ||
End of Period | 227,416,317 | 219,143,809 | ||
Undistributed investment income (loss)—net | (148,601) | 9,860 | ||
Capital Share Transactions (Shares): | ||||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 147,345 | 316,382 | ||
Shares redeemed | (945,944) | (2,629,565) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (798,599) | (2,313,183) | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
14
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
Class I Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, | ||||||||||||
beginning of period | 47.68 | 43.36 | 49.89 | 59.41 | 49.67 | 46.30 | ||||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||
Investment (loss)—netb | (.04) | (.13) | (.12) | (.11) | (.11) | (.14) | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 12.25 | 4.45 | (6.41) | (9.41)c | 9.85c | 3.51 | ||||||
Total from Investment Operations | 12.21 | 4.32 | (6.53) | (9.52) | 9.74 | 3.37 | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period | 59.89 | 47.68 | 43.36 | 49.89 | 59.41 | 49.67 | ||||||
Total Return (%) | 25.61d | 9.96 | (13.14) | (16.02) | 19.61 | 7.28 | ||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .95e | .94 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.09f | 1.38f | ||||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .95e | .94 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.09f | 1.10f | ||||||
Ratio of net investment (loss) | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | (.14)e | (.29) | (.34) | (.20) | (.20) | (.30) | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 79.80d | 181.09 | 271 | 207 | 175g | 166g | ||||||
Net Assets, end of period | ||||||||||||
($ x 1,000) | 227,416 | 219,144 | 299,563 | 232,706 | 186,991 | 42,103 |
a | Effective September 1, 2009, the fund’s shares were redesignated as Class I shares. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amounts include litigation proceeds received by the fund of $.01 for the year ended September 30, 2008 and $.01 |
for the year ended September 30, 2007. | |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
f | Includes the fund’s share of the TBC Small Cap Growth Portfolio’s (the “Portfolio”) allocated expenses. |
g | On September 19, 2007, the fund, which had owned 100% of the Portfolio on such date, withdrew entirely from |
the Portfolio and received the Portfolio’s securities and cash in exchange for its interests in the Portfolio. Effective | |
September 20, 2007, the fund began investing directly in the securities in which the Portfolio had invested. Portfolio | |
turnover represents activity of both the fund and the Portfolio for 2007.The amount shown for 2006 the turnover | |
rate for the Portfolio. | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 15 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Growth Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Investment Funds (the “Trust”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering eleven series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term growth of capital. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold without a sales charge.
The Trust accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked
16
prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board ofTrustees. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant American Depository Receipts and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Trustees, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
The Fund | 17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of March 31, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
Level 2—Other | Level 3— | |||
Level 1— | Significant | Significant | ||
Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | ||
Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |
Assets ($) | ||||
Investments in Securities: | ||||
Equity Securities— | ||||
Domestic† | 218,456,891 | — | — | 218,456,891 |
Equity Securities— | ||||
Foreign† | 4,735,021 | — | — | 4,735,021 |
Mutual Funds | 60,696,605 | — | — | 60,696,605 |
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair
18
value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at March 31, 2011.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended March 31, 2011, The Bank of New York Mellon earned $22,029 from lending portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
The Fund | 19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended March 31, 2011 were as follows:
Affiliated | ||||||
Investment | Value | Value | Net | |||
Company | 9/30/2010 | ($) | Purchases ($) | Sales | ($) 3/31/2011 ($) | Assets (%) |
Dreyfus | ||||||
Institutional | ||||||
Preferred | ||||||
Plus Money | ||||||
Market | ||||||
Fund | 3,074,283 | 50,714,232 | 49,345,175 4,443,340 | 2.0 | ||
Dreyfus | ||||||
Institutional | ||||||
Cash | ||||||
Advantage | ||||||
Fund | 15,429,349 | 128,581,938 | 87,758,022 56,253,265 | 24.7 | ||
Total | 18,503,632 | 179,296,170 | 137,103,197 60,696,605 | 26.7 |
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes
20
interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $43,977,365 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to September 30, 2010. If not applied, $939,793 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2011, $31,203,109 expires in fiscal 2017 and $11,834,463 expires in fiscal 2018.
Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years. As a result of this ordering rule, preenact-ment capital loss carryovers may be more likely to expire unused.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing. During the period ended on March 31, 2011, the fund did not borrow under the Facilities.
The Fund | 21 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
NOTE 3—Investment Advisory Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Manager, the investment advisory fee is computed at the annual rate of .80% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
During the period, the Trust had an agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon, pursuant to whichThe Bank of NewYork Mellon provided administration and fund accounting services for the fund. For these services, the fund pays The Bank of New York Mellon a fixed fee plus asset and transaction based fees, as well as out-of-pocket expenses. Pursuant to this agreement, the fund was charged $22,500 during the period ended March 31, 2011 for administration and fund accounting services.
At a Board Meeting of the Trust held on February 15-16, 2011, the Board of Trustees of the Trust terminated the agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon and, on behalf of the Trust, entered into a Fund Accounting and Administration Agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with Dreyfus, effective May 1, 2011, whereby Dreyfus will perform administrative, accounting and recordkeeping services for the fund. The fund has agreed to compensate Dreyfus for providing accounting services, administration, compliance monitoring, regulatory and shareholder reporting, as well as related facilities, equipment and clerical help.The fee is based on the fund’s average daily net assets and computed at the following annual rates: .06% of the first $500 million, .04% of the next $500 million and .02% in excess of $1 billion.
In addition, after applying any expense limitations or fee waivers that reduce the fees paid to Dreyfus for this service, Dreyfus has contractually agreed in writing to waive any remaining fees for this service to the extent that they exceed both Dreyfus’ costs in providing these services and a reasonable allocation of the costs incurred by Dreyfus and its affiliates related to the support and oversight of these services.
22
The fund also will reimburse Dreyfus for the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing this service for the fund.
(b) The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $4,866 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under cash management agreements for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $567 pursuant to the cash management agreements, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $15.
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $56,458 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $3,146 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: investment advisory fees $150,623, custodian fees $26,000, chief compliance officer fees $1,957 and transfer agency per account fees $1,249.
The Fund | 23 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
(c) Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (as defined in the Act) receives $60,000 per annum, plus $7,000 per joint Board meeting of the Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc., The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Tax-Free Municipal Funds and Dreyfus Funds, Inc. (collectively, the “Board Group Open-end Funds”) attended, $2,500 for separate in-person committee meetings attended which are not held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board meeting and $2,000 for Board meetings and separate committee meetings attended that are conducted by telephone. The Board Group Open-end Funds also reimburse each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (as defined in the Act) for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. With respect to Board meetings, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional 25% of such compensation (with the exception of reimbursable amounts). The Chair of each of the Board’s committees, unless the Chair also serves as Chair of the Board, receives $1,350 per applicable committee meeting. In the event that there is an in-person joint committee meeting or a joint telephone meeting of the Board Group Open-end Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund, the $2,500 or $2,000 fee, as applicable, is allocated between the Board Group Open-end Funds and Dreyfus HighYield Strategies Fund.These fees and expenses are charged and allocated to each series based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended March 31, 2011, amounted to $175,911,118 and $219,201,870, respectively.
At March 31, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $49,735,049, consisting of $52,274,391 gross unrealized appreciation and $2,539,342 gross unrealized depreciation.
At March 31, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
24
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE |
FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) |
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on February 15 and 16, 2011, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory services (the “Agreement”).The Board also considered the approval of a new Fund Accounting and Administrative Services Agreement (the “Administration Agreement” and together with the Agreement, the “Agreements”) pursuant to which Dreyfus would provide the fund with administrative services.1 The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus. In considering the renewal of the Agreement and the approval of the Administration Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below.The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund.The Board members considered information previously provided to them in presentations from representatives of Dreyfus regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and representatives of Dreyfus confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including the distribution channel(s) for the fund.
The Board members also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also would provide oversight of day-to-day
The Fund | 25 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructures.The Board also considered portfolio management’s brokerage policies and practices (including policies and practices regarding soft dollars) and the standards applied in seeking best execution.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio.The Board members reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended December 31, 2010, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Lipper as of September 30, 2010. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds. The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was below the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s benchmark index. The Board expressed its concern with the fund’s performance and requested that Dreyfus take steps to improve it. Representatives of Dreyfus discussed with the Board members the investment style and strategy used by the fund’s portfolio managers to identify and select stocks and the role of
26
fundamental analysis in selecting stocks. Dreyfus representatives agreed to advise the Board of steps being taken to improve fund performance at an upcoming Board meeting.
The Board members also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons.They noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was above the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and the fund’s total expenses were below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
A representative of Dreyfus noted that, in connection with the Administration Agreement and its related fees, Dreyfus contractually agreed to waive any fees to the extent that such fees exceed Dreyfus’ costs in providing the services contemplated under the Administration Agreement.
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the management or investment advisory fees (1) paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund and (2) paid to Dreyfus or the Dreyfus-affiliated primary employer of the fund’s primary portfolio manager for advising any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients.They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that
The Fund | 27 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
the profitability results were not unreasonable, given the services rendered, or to be rendered, and service levels provided, or to be provided, by Dreyfus.The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex.The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
The Board’s counsel stated that the Board members should consider the profitability analysis (1) as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreements bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Dreyfus representatives noted that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on a fund having achieved a substantial size with increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been stable or decreasing, the possibility that Dreyfus may have realized any economies of scale would be less. They also noted that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus funds complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted the soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreement and the approval of
28
the Administration Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
* The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
The Board agreed to closely monitor performance and to renew the Investment Advisory Agreement only for a six-month period, through October 4, 2011.
The Board concluded that the fees payable to Dreyfus were reason- able in light of the considerations described above.
The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreements and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year. In addition, it should be noted that the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of similar agreements during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board members and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board members’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years. The Board members determined that renewal of the Agreement and approval of the Administration Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
1 | Until May 1, 2011, administrative services were provided pursuant to a Custody,Administration and Accounting Services Agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon. |
The Fund | 29 |
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents | |
THE FUND | |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
12 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
13 | Statement of Operations |
14 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
15 | Financial Highlights |
16 | Notes to Financial Statements |
25 | Information About the Renewal of the Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | |
Back Cover |
Dreyfus/The Boston
Company Small Cap
Tax-Sensitive Equity Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
This semiannual report for Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Tax-Sensitive Equity Fund covers the six-month period from October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011.
Equities throughout the world fared well over the past six months. International stock markets have rallied broadly since the fall of 2010, when new rounds of monetary stimulus from U.S. and foreign central banks gave investors confidence that the global economy was unlikely to slip back into recession.As a result, developed markets rebounded strongly from relatively depressed levels, while emerging markets added more moderately to their previous gains. Although political uprisings in the Middle East and the disasters in Japan injected some uncertainty into the investment climate, these events do not appear to have derailed the global market rally. Market sectors that tend to be sensitive to macroeconomic changes performed particularly well as commodity prices climbed and investors looked forward to better business conditions.
We currently expect most developed and emerging markets to adopt less stimulative fiscal and monetary policies over the remainder of 2011 as the global economy reaches the middle stages of its cycle. Moreover, in the wake of recent gains we believe that selectivity will become a more important determinant of investment success in international markets.We favor the core of Europe over more peripheral members of the European Union, and while we expect the emerging markets to grow faster than developed markets, the growth rate in China seems likely to moderate. As always, your financial advisor can help you align your investment portfolio with the opportunities and challenges that 2011 has in store.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
April 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011, as provided by Todd Wakefield and B. Randall Watts, Jr., Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended March 31, 2011, Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Tax-Sensitive Equity Fund produced a total return of 25.51%.1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index (the “Index”), produced a total return of 27.93% for the same period.2
Improving economic conditions drove small-cap stocks higher during the reporting period. Although the fund participated to a significant degree in the market’s gains, its returns lagged the benchmark as shortfalls in the financials, information technology and consumer discretionary sectors offset above-average results in the energy and materials sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks to maximize after-tax total return, consisting of long-term growth of capital.To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of small-cap U.S. companies with total market capitalizations, at the time of purchase, equal to or less than that of the largest company in the Russell 2000 Growth Index. When choosing stocks, we seek to identify small-cap companies which are experiencing or are expected to experience rapid growth. We use tax-sensitive strategies in seeking to reduce the impact of federal and state income taxes on the fund’s after-tax returns, including minimizing sales of securities that result in capital gains and selling underperforming securities to realize capital losses that can be offset against realized capital gains.
Improved Economic Confidence Fueled a Market Rally
The U.S. economic recovery gained traction in the fall of 2010 after the Federal Reserve Board embarked on a new round of quantitative easing of monetary policy, helping to alleviate investors’ concerns regarding a possible return to recession.A more optimistic investment outlook was
The Fund | 3 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
reinforced by subsequent improvements in U.S. employment and consumer spending, as well as by better-than-expected corporate earnings across a number of industry groups.
Later in the fall, the resolution of U.S. midterm elections and the passage of fiscally stimulative tax legislation lent further support to the stock market. However, the market rally was interrupted in February when political unrest in the Middle East led to sharply higher energy prices, and again in March when Japan suffered a devastating earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster. Still, stocks generally proved resilient, rebounding quickly and ending the reporting period with significant gains, on average. Small-cap stocks produced substantially higher returns than their large-cap counterparts over the reporting period, and growth stocks generally outperformed value-oriented stocks.
Stock Selections Produced Mixed Results
The fund’s relative performance in the financials sector was undermined by mortgage services provider Altisource Portfolio Solutions, which exhibited lower-than-expected EPS results during the reporting period. In addition, consumer finance company Green Dot suffered due to concerns regarding proposed government regulations targeting prepaid debit cards.
In the information technology sector, marketing technology solutions provider Acxiom declined following changes in its management team and reduced quarterly earnings guidance. Electronic components maker Sanmina-SCI was hurt by the resignation of its chief financial officer, and the company issued reduced earnings guidance. Among consumer discretionary companies, general merchandiser 99 Cents Only Stores saw lower sales during the 2010 holiday season due to weather disruptions.
The fund achieved better relative results in the energy sector, which generally benefited from rising commodity prices. Independent exploration-and-production company Gulfport Energy moved higher as the company’s entry into the Utica shale in Ohio and gas discovery in Thailand both provided strong growth opportunities for the stock, and Oil States International advanced due to strong results from its remote site accommodations business unit after a strategic acquisition. Pioneer Drilling achieved better-than-expected revenues and profit margins amid increased oil and gas production in the United States and Columbia. In
4
the materials sector, successful stock selections included Schnitzer Steel Industries, which increased sales and revenues as commodity prices climbed. Improved production and utilization rates at Horsehead Holding enabled the mining company to boost sales of zinc and nickel.
Positioned for a More Selective Environment
We expect the U.S. economic recovery to continue, which could lead to increased hiring and higher corporate earnings in a number of industries.At the same time, we are aware of potential headwinds that could dampen economic growth and earnings, including ongoing geopolitical instability and the impact of intensifying inflationary pressures on input costs for some businesses.We believe that investors are likely to become more selective in such an environment as they focus more intently on individual companies’ underlying business fundamentals and place less emphasis on macroeconomic developments.
Consequently, we have positioned the fund for additional gains in the energy sector, where we believe commodity prices are likely to remain elevated amid rising demand for a limited supply of crude oil.We have identified fewer companies meeting our investment criteria in the consumer discretionary sector.
April 15, 2011
Please note, the position in any security highlighted in italicized typeface was sold during the | |
reporting period. | |
Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment | |
style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the | |
fund’s prospectus. | |
The prices of small company stocks tend to be more volatile than the prices of large company | |
stocks, mainly because these companies have less established and more volatile earnings histories. | |
They also tend to be less liquid than larger company stocks. | |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid. Past performance is no |
guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, | |
fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. | |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — The Russell 2000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index, |
which measures the performance of those Russell 2000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios | |
and higher forecasted growth values.The total return figure cited for this index assumes change in | |
security prices and reinvestment of dividends, but does not reflect the costs of managing a mutual | |
fund. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. |
The Fund | 5 |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small CapTax-Sensitive Equity Fund from October 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||
assuming actual returns for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 5.62 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,255.10 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 5.04 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,019.95 |
Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.00% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks—98.8% | Shares | Value ($) |
Consumer Discretionary—15.2% | ||
Aaron’s | 91,960a | 2,332,106 |
Buffalo Wild Wings | 10,420 b | 567,161 |
Cheesecake Factory | 37,540a,b | 1,129,579 |
Citi Trends | 67,000b | 1,493,430 |
Interface, Cl. A | 118,060 | 2,182,929 |
Interval Leisure Group | 57,260b | 936,201 |
Jarden | 39,000a | 1,387,230 |
JOS. A. Bank Clothiers | 25,279 a,b | 1,286,196 |
Lions Gate Entertainment | 222,852b | 1,392,825 |
Papa John’s International | 33,240 b | 1,052,711 |
Regis | 102,300a | 1,814,802 |
Select Comfort | 169,400b | 2,042,964 |
Stage Stores | 36,940 | 709,987 |
Tractor Supply | 27,180 | 1,626,995 |
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance | 29,010a,b | 1,396,251 |
VistaPrint | 42,210b | 2,190,699 |
Vitamin Shoppe | 54,070a,b | 1,829,188 |
Warnaco Group | 53,360b | 3,051,658 |
28,422,912 | ||
Consumer Staples—3.0% | ||
Casey’s General Stores | 34,340a | 1,339,260 |
Darling International | 105,170 b | 1,616,463 |
Inter Parfums | 93,090 | 1,723,096 |
United Natural Foods | 20,430 a,b | 915,673 |
5,594,492 | ||
Energy—9.2% | ||
Bill Barrett | 58,490a,b | 2,334,336 |
Brigham Exploration | 38,550 b | 1,433,289 |
Cal Dive International | 145,480 b | 1,015,450 |
Carrizo Oil & Gas | 72,913b | 2,692,677 |
Dril-Quip | 19,420b | 1,534,763 |
Global Industries | 131,720a,b | 1,289,539 |
Gulfport Energy | 63,760a,b | 2,304,924 |
Northern Oil and Gas | 32,450 a,b | 866,415 |
The Fund | 7 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Energy (continued) | ||
Oil States International | 36,480 a,b | 2,777,587 |
Pioneer Drilling | 76,450b | 1,055,010 |
17,303,990 | ||
Exchange Traded Funds—.7% | ||
iShares Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund | 13,340a | 1,271,836 |
Financial—8.8% | ||
Brookline Bancorp | 53,230 | 560,512 |
Dime Community Bancshares | 91,120 | 1,344,931 |
Green Dot, Cl. A | 18,760a | 804,992 |
Hatteras Financial | 31,420 | 883,530 |
Hersha Hospitality Trust | 143,280a,c | 851,083 |
MarketAxess Holdings | 76,520 a | 1,851,784 |
MFA Financial | 116,080c | 951,856 |
Portfolio Recovery Associates | 31,930a,b | 2,718,201 |
Potlatch | 58,840c | 2,365,368 |
Resolute Energy | 60,310a,b | 1,094,023 |
Signature Bank | 16,650a,b | 939,060 |
World Acceptance | 33,240a,b | 2,167,248 |
16,532,588 | ||
Health Care—17.1% | ||
Alexion Pharmaceuticals | 20,420 b | 2,015,046 |
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions | 67,670 b | 1,420,393 |
Analogic | 33,320 | 1,884,246 |
Catalyst Health Solutions | 32,260 b | 1,804,302 |
Centene | 44,330b | 1,462,003 |
Chemed | 27,850 | 1,855,088 |
Cooper | 40,730a | 2,828,698 |
Exact Sciences | 43,830b | 322,589 |
Exelixis | 100,800a,b | 1,139,040 |
HeartWare International | 9,360 a,b | 800,561 |
MAP Pharmaceuticals | 100,730a,b | 1,389,067 |
Masimo | 28,020a | 927,462 |
PerkinElmer | 72,690 | 1,909,566 |
Pharmasset | 21,200b | 1,668,652 |
Salix Pharmaceuticals | 54,220 a,b | 1,899,327 |
SXC Health Solutions | 43,970 b | 2,409,556 |
8
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | |
Health Care (continued) | |||
Theravance | 51,890a,b | 1,256,776 | |
Thermo Fisher Scientific | 26,690b | 1,482,630 | |
United Therapeutics | 15,180a,b | 1,017,364 | |
ViroPharma | 54,160a,b | 1,077,784 | |
Volcano | 60,830a,b | 1,557,248 | |
32,127,398 | |||
Industrial—14.8% | |||
American Reprographics | 43,290b | 448,051 | |
Columbus McKinnon | 50,900b | 939,614 | |
Corporate Executive Board | 45,210 | 1,825,128 | |
Crane | 41,920 | 2,030,186 | |
EMCOR Group | 48,740b | 1,509,478 | |
EnerSys | 69,750b | 2,772,562 | |
EnPro Industries | 33,060a,b | 1,200,739 | |
Exponent | 37,660b | 1,680,013 | |
GeoEye | 35,710b | 1,484,822 | |
Interline Brands | 64,780a,b | 1,321,512 | |
Kforce | 165,840a,b | 3,034,872 | |
Middleby | 16,030a,b | 1,494,317 | |
Mueller Industries | 60,410 | 2,212,214 | |
Old Dominion Freight Line | 28,050b | 984,274 | |
Taleo, Cl. A | 50,710b | 1,807,812 | |
Teledyne Technologies | 38,628b | 1,997,454 | |
Werner Enterprises | 36,570a | 968,008 | |
27,711,056 | |||
Materials—3.4% | |||
AMCOL International | 38,000a | 1,367,240 | |
Arch Chemicals | 42,870a | 1,782,963 | |
Horsehead Holding | 67,750b | 1,155,137 | |
Intrepid Potash | 61,950a,b | 2,157,099 | |
6,462,439 | |||
Technology—25.6% | |||
Advanced Energy Industries | 111,110b | 1,816,648 | |
Blackboard | 33,300a,b | 1,206,792 | |
CACI International, Cl. A | 50,704a,b | 3,109,169 | |
Commvault Systems | 74,390b | 2,966,673 |
The Fund | 9 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | |
Technology (continued) | |||
Constant Contact | 78,950a,b | 2,755,355 | |
Fair Isaac | 47,020a | 1,486,302 | |
Harmonic | 450,010b | 4,221,094 | |
Ixia | 23,510a,b | 373,339 | |
KEMET | 102,590b | 1,521,410 | |
MAXIMUS | 20,950 | 1,700,511 | |
Mellanox Technologies | 33,967b | 856,987 | |
Netgear | 75,450b | 2,447,598 | |
NetScout Systems | 85,570b | 2,337,772 | |
OmniVision Technologies | 88,600b | 3,147,958 | |
PMC-Sierra | 116,280b | 872,100 | |
QLogic | 94,370b | 1,750,563 | |
Quality Systems | 13,910a | 1,159,259 | |
Quest Software | 51,050b | 1,296,160 | |
Rackspace Hosting | 37,630a,b | 1,612,445 | |
Rovi | 10,463a,b | 561,340 | |
Sanmina-SCI | 97,550b | 1,093,536 | |
ShoreTel | 118,610b | 976,160 | |
SuccessFactors | 46,630a,b | 1,822,767 | |
Triquint Semiconductor | 192,820a,b | 2,489,306 | |
Ultratech | 60,270b | 1,771,938 | |
VeriFone Holdings | 24,880a,b | 1,367,156 | |
Vocus | 52,630a,b | 1,361,012 | |
48,081,350 | |||
Technology Services—1.0% | |||
Aruba Networks | 54,040a,b | 1,828,714 | |
Total Common Stocks | |||
(cost $147,029,988) | 185,336,775 | ||
Other Investment—1.2% | |||
Registered Investment Company; | |||
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | |||
Plus Money Market Fund | |||
(cost $2,205,023) | 2,205,023d | 2,205,023 |
10
Investment of Cash Collateral | ||||
for Securities Loaned—27.3% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Cash | ||||
Advantage Fund | ||||
(cost $51,197,817) | 51,197,817d | 51,197,817 | ||
Total Investments (cost $200,432,828) | 127.3% | 238,739,615 | ||
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (27.3%) | (51,182,761) | ||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 187,556,854 |
a Security, or portion thereof, on loan.At March 31, 2011, the value of the fund’s securities on loan was |
$50,019,202 and the value of the collateral held by the fund was $51,197,817. |
b Non-income producing security. |
c Investment in real estate investment trust. |
d Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | |||
Value (%) | Value (%) | ||
Money Market Investments | 28.5 | Financial | 8.8 |
Technology | 25.6 | Materials | 3.4 |
Health Care | 17.1 | Consumer Staples | 3.0 |
Consumer Discretionary | 15.2 | Technology Services | 1.0 |
Industrial | 14.8 | Exchange Traded Funds | .7 |
Energy | 9.2 | 127.3 | |
† Based on net assets. | |||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 11 |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Cost | Value | ||
Assets ($): | |||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments (including | |||
securities on loan, valued at $50,019,202)—Note 1(b): | |||
Unaffiliated issuers | 147,029,988 | 185,336,775 | |
Affiliated issuers | 53,402,840 | 53,402,840 | |
Cash | 61,732 | ||
Receivable for investment securities sold | 4,335,160 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 72,498 | ||
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | 286 | ||
Prepaid expenses | 13,347 | ||
243,222,638 | |||
Liabilities ($): | |||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(b) | 158,961 | ||
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(b) | 51,197,817 | ||
Payable for investment securities purchased | 3,588,673 | ||
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | 667,662 | ||
Accrued expenses | 52,671 | ||
55,665,784 | |||
Net Assets ($) | 187,556,854 | ||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | |||
Paid-in capital | 189,698,558 | ||
Accumulated investment (loss)—net | (173,009) | ||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (40,275,482) | ||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | |||
(depreciation) on investments | 38,306,787 | ||
Net Assets ($) | 187,556,854 | ||
Class I Shares Outstanding | |||
(unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest authorized) | 4,671,743 | ||
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($) | 40.15 | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends: | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 681,393 | |
Affiliated issuers | 2,544 | |
Income from securities lending—Note 1(b) | 58,164 | |
Total Income | 742,101 | |
Expenses: | ||
Investment advisory fee—Note 3(a) | 738,546 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(b) | 66,149 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(b) | 37,871 | |
Professional fees | 33,640 | |
Accounting and administration fees—Note 3(a) | 22,500 | |
Registration fees | 6,812 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(c) | 6,135 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 4,812 | |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 269 | |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 239 | |
Miscellaneous | 6,779 | |
Total Expenses | 923,752 | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(b) | (5) | |
Net Expenses | 923,747 | |
Investment (Loss)—Net | (181,646) | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 26,799,141 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 15,508,485 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 42,307,626 | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 42,125,980 | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 13 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010a | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment (loss)—net | (181,646) | (623,171) | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 26,799,141 | 32,428,299 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 15,508,485 | (13,558,978) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | 42,125,980 | 18,246,150 | ||
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold | 7,894,144 | 14,599,482 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed | (46,260,701) | (52,853,254) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | ||||
Beneficial Interest Transactions | (38,366,557) | (38,253,772) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 3,759,423 | (20,007,622) | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 183,797,431 | 203,805,053 | ||
End of Period | 187,556,854 | 183,797,431 | ||
Undistributed investment income (loss)—net | (173,009) | 8,637 | ||
Capital Share Transactions (Shares): | ||||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 216,989 | 490,583 | ||
Shares redeemed | (1,291,379) | (1,759,076) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (1,074,390) | (1,268,493) | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
14
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
Class I Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, | ||||||||||||
beginning of period | 31.99 | 29.05 | 33.59 | 43.15 | 42.27 | 42.35 | ||||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||
Investment (loss)—netb | (.04) | (.10) | (.09) | (.07) | (.07) | (.08) | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 8.20 | 3.04c | (4.45) | (6.42)c | 8.07c | 3.08 | ||||||
Total from Investment Operations | 8.16 | 2.94 | (4.54) | (6.49) | 8.00 | 3.00 | ||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||||
gain on investments | — | — | — | (3.07) | (7.12) | (3.08) | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period | 40.15 | 31.99 | 29.05 | 33.59 | 43.15 | 42.27 | ||||||
Total Return (%) | 25.51d | 10.12 | (13.54) | (15.99) | 20.79 | 7.49 | ||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.00e | .99 | 1.05 | .95 | .96 | .99 | ||||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.00e | .99 | 1.05 | .95 | .96 | .99 | ||||||
Ratio of net investment (loss) | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | (.20)e | (.33) | (.38) | (.19) | (.17) | (.18) | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 82.97d | 171.24 | 265.74 | 209 | 170 | 169 | ||||||
Net Assets, end of period | ||||||||||||
($ x 1,000) | 187,557 | 183,797 | 203,805 | 303,246 | 316,479 | 160,552 |
a | Effective September 1, 2009, the fund’s shares were redesignated as Class I shares. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amount includes litigation proceeds received by the fund amounting to $.02, $.01 and $.04, respectively, per share |
for the years ended September 30, 2010, 2008 and 2007. | |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 15 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Tax-Sensitive Equity Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Investment Funds (the “Trust”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates a series company currently offering eleven series, including the fund. The fund’s investment objective is to maximize after-tax total return, consisting of long-term growth of capital. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold without a sales charge.
The Trust accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no
16
transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on the exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board ofTrustees. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant American Depository Receipts and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Trustees, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
The Fund | 17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of March 31, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
Level 2—Other | Level 3— | |||
Level 1— | Significant | Significant | ||
Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | ||
Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |
Assets ($) | ||||
Investments in Securities: | ||||
Equity Securities— | ||||
Domestic† | 180,205,588 | — | — | 180,205,588 |
Equity Securities— | ||||
Foreign† | 3,859,351 | — | — | 3,859,351 |
Mutual Funds/ | ||||
Exchange | ||||
Traded Funds | 54,674,676 | — | — | 54,674,676 |
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measure-
18
ments as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at March 31, 2011.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended March 31, 2011, The Bank of New York Mellon earned $19,388 from lending portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
The Fund | 19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended March 31, 2011 were as follows:
Affiliated | |||||||
Investment | Value | Value | Net | ||||
Company | 9/30/2010 | ($) | Purchases ($) | Sales ($) | 3/31/2011 | ($) | Assets (%) |
Dreyfus | |||||||
Institutional | |||||||
Preferred | |||||||
Plus Money | |||||||
Market | |||||||
Fund | 3,587,659 | 44,605,993 | 45,988,629 | 2,205,023 | 1.2 | ||
Dreyfus | |||||||
Institutional | |||||||
Cash | |||||||
Advantage | |||||||
Fund | 22,398,298 | 139,639,216 | 110,839,697 | 51,197,817 | 27.3 | ||
Total | 25,985,957 | 184,245,209 | 156,828,326 | 53,402,840 | 28.5 |
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes
20
interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $65,187,670 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to September 30, 2010. If not applied, $34,288,194 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2017 and $30,899,476 expires in fiscal 2018.
Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years.As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryovers may be more likely to expire unused.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing.
The Fund | 21 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The average amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facilities during the period ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $37,900, with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.42%.
NOTE 3—Investment Advisory Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Manager, the investment advisory fee is computed at the annual rate of .80% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
During the period, the Trust had an agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon pursuant to whichThe Bank of NewYork Mellon provided administration and fund accounting services for the fund. For these services, the fund pays The Bank of NewYork Mellon a fixed fee plus asset and transaction based fees, as well as out-of-pocket expenses. Pursuant to this agreement, the fund was charged $22,500 during the period ended March 31, 2011 for administration and fund accounting services.
At a Board Meeting of the Trust held on February 15-16, 2011, the Board of Trustees of the Trust terminated the agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon and, on behalf of the Trust, entered into a Fund Accounting and Administration Agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with Dreyfus, effective May 1, 2011, whereby Dreyfus will perform administrative, accounting and recordkeeping services for the fund. The fund has agreed to compensate Dreyfus for providing accounting services, administration, compliance monitoring, regulatory and shareholder reporting, as well as related facilities, equipment and clerical help.The fee is based on the fund’s average daily net assets and computed at the following annual rates: .06% of the first $500 million, .04% of the next $500 million and .02% in excess of $1 billion.
In addition, after applying any expense limitations or fee waivers that reduce the fees paid to Dreyfus for this service, Dreyfus has contractually agreed in writing to waive any remaining fees for this service to the extent that they exceed both Dreyfus’ costs in providing these services and a reasonable allocation of the costs incurred by Dreyfus and its affiliates related to the support and oversight of these services.
22
The fund also will reimburse Dreyfus for the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing this service for the fund.
(b) The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $1,795 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under cash management agreements for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $180 pursuant to the cash management agreements, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $5.
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $66,149 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $3,146 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: investment advisory fees $124,712, custodian fees $27,400, chief compliance officer fees $1,957 and transfer agency per account fees $4,892.
The Fund | 23 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
(c) Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (as defined in the Act) receives $60,000 per annum, plus $7,000 per joint Board meeting of the Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc., The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Tax-Free Municipal Funds and Dreyfus Funds, Inc. (collectively, the “Board Group Open-End Funds”) attended, $2,500 for separate in-person committee meetings attended which are not held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board meeting and $2,000 for Board meetings and separate committee meetings attended that are conducted by telephone. The Board Group Open-End Funds also reimburse eachTrustee who is not an “interested person” of theTrust (as defined in the Act) for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. With respect to Board meetings, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional 25% of such compensation (with the exception of reimbursable amounts).The Chair of each of the Board’s committees, unless the Chair also serves as Chair of the Board, receives $1,350 per applicable committee meeting. In the event that there is an in-person joint committee meeting or a joint telephone meeting of the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund, the $2,500 or $2,000 fee, as applicable, is allocated between the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund.These fees and expenses are charged and allocated to each series based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended March 31, 2011, amounted to $150,811,039 and $188,850,183, respectively.
At March 31, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $38,306,787, consisting of $40,060,279 gross unrealized appreciation and $1,753,492 gross unrealized depreciation.
At March 31, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
24
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE |
FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) |
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on February 15 and 16, 2011, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory services (the “Agreement”).The Board also considered the approval of a new Fund Accounting and Administrative Services Agreement (the “Administration Agreement” and together with the Agreement, the “Agreements”) pursuant to which Dreyfus would provide the fund with administrative services.1 The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus. In considering the renewal of the Agreement and the approval of the Administration Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below.The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund.The Board members considered information previously provided to them in presentations from representatives of Dreyfus regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and representatives of Dreyfus confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including the distribution channel(s) for the fund.
The Board members also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also would provide oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assis-
The Fund | 25 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
tance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructures. The Board also considered portfolio management’s brokerage policies and practices (including policies and practices regarding soft dollars) and the standards applied in seeking best execution.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio.The Board members reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended December 31, 2010, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Lipper as of September 30, 2010. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds.The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was generally at or below the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s benchmark index.The Board expressed its concern with the fund’s performance and requested that Dreyfus take steps to improve it. Representatives of Dreyfus discussed with the Board members the investment style and strategy used by the fund’s portfolio managers to identify and select stocks and the role of fundamental analysis in selecting stocks. Dreyfus representatives agreed to advise the Board of steps being taken to improve fund performance at an upcoming Board meeting.
26
The Board members also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. They noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was at the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was at the Expense Group median and above the Expense Universe median and the fund’s total expenses were below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
A representative of Dreyfus noted that, in connection with the Administration Agreement and its related fees, Dreyfus contractually agreed to waive any fees to the extent that such fees exceed Dreyfus’ costs in providing the services contemplated under the Administration Agreement.
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the management or investment advisory fees (1) paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund and (2) paid to Dreyfus or the Dreyfus-affiliated primary employer of the fund’s primary portfolio manager for advising any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients.They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable, given the services rendered, or to be rendered, and service levels provided, or to be provided, by Dreyfus.The Board previously had been provided
The Fund | 27 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex. The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
The Board’s counsel stated that the Board members should consider the profitability analysis (1) as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreements bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Dreyfus representatives noted that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on a fund having achieved a substantial size with increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been stable or decreasing, the possibility that Dreyfus may have realized any economies of scale would be less. They also noted that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus funds complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted the soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreement and approval of the Administration Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
28
The Board agreed to closely monitor performance and to renew the Agreement only for a six-month period, through October 4, 2011.
The Board concluded that the fees payable to Dreyfus were reason- able in light of the considerations described above.
The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreements and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year. In addition, it should be noted that the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of similar agreements during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board members and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board members’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years. The Board members determined that renewal of the Agreement and approval of the Administration Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
1 | Until May 1, 2011, administrative services were provided pursuant to a Custody,Administration and Accounting Services Agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon. |
The Fund | 29 |
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents | |
THE FUND | |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
13 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
14 | Statement of Operations |
15 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
16 | Financial Highlights |
17 | Notes to Financial Statements |
26 | Information About the Renewal of the Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | |
Back Cover |
Dreyfus/The Boston
Company Small Cap
Value Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
This semiannual report for Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Value Fund covers the six-month period from October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011.
Equities throughout the world fared well over the past six months. International stock markets have rallied broadly since the fall of 2010, when new rounds of monetary stimulus from U.S. and foreign central banks gave investors confidence that the global economy was unlikely to slip back into recession. As a result, developed markets rebounded strongly from relatively depressed levels, while emerging markets added more moderately to their previous gains.Although political uprisings in the Middle East and the disasters in Japan injected some uncertainty into the investment climate, these events do not appear to have derailed the global market rally. Market sectors that tend to be sensitive to macroeconomic changes performed particularly well as commodity prices climbed and investors looked forward to better business conditions.
We currently expect most developed and emerging markets to adopt less stimulative fiscal and monetary policies over the remainder of 2011 as the global economy reaches the middle stages of its cycle. Moreover, in the wake of recent gains we believe that selectivity will become a more important determinant of investment success in international markets.We favor the core of Europe over more peripheral members of the European Union, and while we expect the emerging markets to grow faster than developed markets, the growth rate in China seems likely to moderate. As always, your financial advisor can help you align your investment portfolio with the opportunities and challenges that 2011 has in store.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
April 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011, as provided by Joseph M. Corrado, CFA, and Stephanie K. Brandaleone, CFA, Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended March 31, 2011, Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Value Fund produced a total return of 20.92%.1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Russell 2000 Value Index (the “Index”), produced a total return of 22.97% for the same period.2
Improving economic conditions drove small-cap stocks higher during the reporting period. Although the fund participated to a significant degree in the market’s gains, its returns lagged the Index due to shortfalls in our security selection strategies in the consumer discretionary and financials sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks long-term growth of capital.To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of small-cap U.S. companies with market capitalizations, at the time of purchase, that are equal to or less than the total market capitalization of the largest company in the Index. We use fundamental research and qualitative analysis to select stocks and look for companies with strong competitive positions, high-quality management, and financial strength. We use a consistent three-step fundamental research process to evaluate the stocks, consisting of valuation, which is to identify small-cap companies that are considered to be attractively priced relative to their earnings potential; fundamentals, which is to verify the strength of the underlying business position; and catalyst, which is to identify a specific event that has the potential to cause the stocks to appreciate in value.
Improved Economic Confidence Fueled a Market Rally
The economic recovery gained traction in the fall of 2010 after a new round of quantitative easing of monetary policy relieved investors’ previous concerns regarding a possible return to recession. A more
The Fund | 3 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
optimistic investment outlook was reinforced by subsequent improvements in U.S. employment and consumer spending, as well as by better-than-expected corporate earnings.
Later in the fall, the resolution of U.S. midterm elections and the passage of fiscally stimulative tax legislation lent further support to the domestic stock market. However, the market rally was interrupted in February when political unrest in the Middle East led to sharply higher energy prices, and again in March when Japan suffered a devastating earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster. Still, stocks generally proved resilient, ending the reporting period with significant gains, on average. Small- and midcap stocks produced substantially higher returns than their large-cap counterparts over the reporting period, but value stocks generally lagged growth-oriented stocks.
Stock Selection Strategies Produced Mixed Results
The fund’s relative performance in the consumer discretionary sector was hindered by specialty retailers.Apparel seller Talbots saw lower sales and higher inventory levels, and Bebe stores suffered a decline in store traffic due to greater competitive pressures.At both companies, earnings declined due to costly promotional campaigns launched in an effort to improve sales trends.The fund’s results compared to the benchmark also were undermined in the financials sector, where Wilmington Trust was acquired by M&T Bank in a takeover at a meaningfully discounted price after reporting another huge loss due to properly reflecting non-performing assets. Private mortgage insurance provider MGIC Investment slid due to non-performing assets, and homebuilder and mortgage finance companyThe Ryland Group was hurt by persistently weak U.S. housing markets.
The fund achieved better relative results in the utilities sector, where strong stock selections included natural public utility company El Paso Electric, which benefited from significant revenue growth during the reporting period. In the energy sector, a number of equipment services providers advanced as oil and gas prices climbed. Contract driller Unit increased production guidance, facilities construction contractor Matrix Service reported better-than-expected quarterly results due to stronger
4
demand for above-ground storage tanks, andTesco benefited from greater domestic and international adoption of advanced natural-gas production technologies. Finally, in the information technology sector, semiconductor equipment manufacturer Cymer benefited from strong sales growth throughout the reporting period, and wireless specialist Atheros Communications was acquired by Qualcomm during the reporting period.
Positioned for a More Selective Environment
We expect the economic recovery to continue, which could lead to increased hiring and higher corporate earnings in a number of indus-tries.At the same time, we are aware of potential headwinds that could dampen economic growth and earnings, including ongoing geopolitical instability and the impact of intensifying inflationary pressures on input costs for some businesses.We believe that investors are likely to become more selective in such an environment as they focus more intently on individual companies’ underlying business fundamentals. Consequently, our bottom-up security selection process has identified a number of fundamentally sound, value-oriented opportunities among service providers in the health care sector, but fewer companies in the financials sector have met our investment criteria.
April 15, 2011
Please note, the position in any security highlighted in italicized typeface was sold during the | |
reporting period. | |
Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment | |
style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the | |
fund’s prospectus. | |
Small companies carry additional risks because their earnings and revenues tend to be less | |
predictable, and their share prices more volatile than those of larger, more established companies. | |
The shares of smaller companies tend to trade less frequently than those of larger, more established | |
companies, which can adversely affect the pricing of these securities and the fund’s ability to sell | |
these securities. | |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid. Past performance is no |
guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, | |
fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. | |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects the reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, |
capital gain distributions.The Russell 2000 Value Index is an unmanaged index, which measures | |
the performance of those Russell 2000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower | |
forecasted growth values. |
The Fund | 5 |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small CapValue Fund from October 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||
assuming actual returns for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 5.12 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,209.20 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 4.68 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,020.29 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund's annualized expense ratio of .93% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks—99.7% | Shares | Value ($) |
Consumer Discretionary—11.9% | ||
99 Cents Only Stores | 91,740a | 1,798,104 |
Bebe Stores | 109,270b | 639,229 |
Big 5 Sporting Goods | 132,760 | 1,582,499 |
Cavco Industries | 38,822a,b | 1,753,202 |
Chico’s FAS | 196,950b | 2,934,555 |
Children’s Place Retail Stores | 77,360 a,b | 3,854,849 |
Drew Industries | 39,530b | 882,705 |
Ethan Allen Interiors | 203,370 b | 4,453,803 |
Express | 72,770b | 1,421,926 |
Foot Locker | 266,570b | 5,256,760 |
Jack in the Box | 188,370a,b | 4,272,232 |
Jones Group | 185,880b | 2,555,850 |
Meredith | 132,670b | 4,500,166 |
Meritage Homes | 127,860a,b | 3,085,262 |
OfficeMax | 434,124a,b | 5,617,565 |
Ryland Group | 251,450b | 3,998,055 |
Skechers USA, Cl. A | 102,880a,b | 2,113,155 |
Thor Industries | 142,980b | 4,771,243 |
Timberland, Cl. A | 95,600 a,b | 3,947,324 |
Williams-Sonoma | 62,862 b | 2,545,911 |
61,984,395 | ||
Consumer Staples—5.0% | ||
BJ’s Wholesale Club | 95,150 a | 4,645,223 |
Casey’s General Stores | 57,643b | 2,248,077 |
Flowers Foods | 139,300b | 3,793,139 |
Hain Celestial Group | 73,960 a,b | 2,387,429 |
Lancaster Colony | 54,900b | 3,326,940 |
Sanderson Farms | 28,470b | 1,307,342 |
Snyders-Lance | 190,070b | 3,772,890 |
Spartan Stores | 183,570 | 2,715,000 |
Winn-Dixie Stores | 244,680 a,b | 1,747,015 |
25,943,055 | ||
Energy—9.6% | ||
Berry Petroleum, Cl. A | 66,200 b | 3,339,790 |
Cal Dive International | 324,230 a | 2,263,125 |
The Fund | 7 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Energy (continued) | ||
Cloud Peak Energy | 46,620 a | 1,006,526 |
Comstock Resources | 155,000a,b | 4,795,700 |
Dawson Geophysical | 23,830a,b | 1,045,660 |
Frontier Oil | 96,310 | 2,823,809 |
Global Industries | 331,340 a,b | 3,243,819 |
Matrix Service | 259,050a | 3,600,795 |
Newpark Resources | 367,560a | 2,889,022 |
Penn Virginia | 209,600b | 3,554,816 |
Rex Energy | 157,940a,b | 1,840,001 |
Tesco | 104,450a | 2,292,678 |
Tidewater | 99,940b | 5,981,409 |
Unit | 141,070a | 8,739,287 |
Warren Resources | 496,250a | 2,525,913 |
49,942,350 | ||
Exchange Traded Funds—.3% | ||
iShares Russell 2000 Value Index Fund | 20,750 b | 1,564,135 |
Financial—26.9% | ||
Associated Banc-Corp | 253,640b | 3,766,554 |
BioMed Realty Trust | 295,210b,c | 5,614,894 |
Brookline Bancorp | 332,870b | 3,505,121 |
Cardinal Financial | 90,330 b | 1,053,248 |
CBL & Associates Properties | 194,350b,c | 3,385,577 |
City National | 74,817 b | 4,268,310 |
CVB Financial | 471,600 b | 4,390,596 |
DCT Industrial Trust | 747,320 b,c | 4,147,626 |
DiamondRock Hospitality | 427,111 b,c | 4,770,830 |
E*TRADE Financial | 352,981 a | 5,517,093 |
Entertainment Properties Trust | 61,910 b,c | 2,898,626 |
First American Financial | 326,730 b | 5,391,045 |
First Midwest Bancorp | 189,780b | 2,237,506 |
Fulton Financial | 190,880 b | 2,120,677 |
Hanover Insurance Group | 90,220 b | 4,082,455 |
Inland Real Estate | 367,080 b,c | 3,501,943 |
8
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Financial (continued) | ||
Investment Technology Group | 223,231 a,b | 4,060,572 |
Janus Capital Group | 190,770 b | 2,378,902 |
Lakeland Financial | 45,730 | 1,037,156 |
LaSalle Hotel Properties | 197,350b,c | 5,328,450 |
Lexington Realty Trust | 577,320b,c | 5,397,942 |
MB Financial | 82,480 b | 1,728,781 |
MGIC Investment | 1,247,230a,b | 11,087,875 |
National Health Investors | 78,570 b,c | 3,765,074 |
National Penn Bancshares | 440,860 b | 3,412,256 |
Omega Healthcare Investors | 207,820 b,c | 4,642,699 |
PacWest Bancorp | 174,140b | 3,787,545 |
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust | 23,970 | 530,935 |
Piper Jaffray | 91,060a,b | 3,772,616 |
PrivateBancorp | 137,520b | 2,102,681 |
Protective Life | 149,310b | 3,964,180 |
Provident Financial Services | 206,650 b | 3,058,420 |
Southwest Bancorp | 116,647a,b | 1,655,221 |
SVB Financial Group | 119,320 a,b | 6,792,888 |
Urstadt Biddle Properties, Cl. A | 50,620 b,c | 962,792 |
Viad | 103,960 | 2,488,802 |
Washington Trust Bancorp | 34,340 b | 815,232 |
Webster Financial | 233,850 b | 5,011,406 |
Whitney Holding | 169,810 | 2,312,812 |
140,747,338 | ||
Health Care—9.5% | ||
Air Methods | 41,220a,b | 2,772,045 |
AMERIGROUP | 81,890a,b | 5,261,432 |
Assisted Living Concepts, Cl. A | 41,860 a | 1,638,400 |
Haemonetics | 92,970a,b | 6,093,254 |
Healthsouth | 105,100a,b | 2,625,398 |
HealthSpring | 80,250a | 2,998,942 |
Kensey Nash | 71,784a,b | 1,788,139 |
LifePoint Hospitals | 146,340 a,b | 5,879,941 |
The Fund | 9 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Health Care (continued) | ||
Mednax | 82,983a | 5,527,498 |
Omnicell | 234,250a | 3,569,970 |
Parexel International | 189,180 a,b | 4,710,582 |
STERIS | 189,860b | 6,557,764 |
49,423,365 | ||
Industrial—16.1% | ||
Apogee Enterprises | 186,840 | 2,464,420 |
Astec Industries | 114,080a,b | 4,254,043 |
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings | 47,090 a | 3,283,115 |
Brink’s | 232,000b | 7,681,520 |
Carlisle | 82,510 | 3,675,820 |
Clean Harbors | 63,900a,b | 6,304,374 |
Columbus McKinnon | 107,630 a | 1,986,850 |
Comfort Systems USA | 138,200b | 1,944,474 |
Duff & Phelps, Cl. A | 113,340 b | 1,811,173 |
FreightCar America | 36,360a | 1,182,064 |
FTI Consulting | 163,510 a,b | 6,267,338 |
Granite Construction | 176,324b | 4,954,704 |
Heartland Express | 146,250b | 2,568,150 |
Heidrick & Struggles International | 80,340 b | 2,235,862 |
Huron Consulting Group | 55,400 a | 1,534,026 |
Marten Transport | 103,850 | 2,315,855 |
McGrath Rentcorp | 77,550 | 2,114,788 |
Mueller Industries | 113,890 b | 4,170,652 |
RSC Holdings | 263,520a,b | 3,789,418 |
Spirit Aerosystems Holdings, Cl. A | 199,330 a,b | 5,116,801 |
Steelcase, Cl. A | 374,520b | 4,262,038 |
Team | 72,260a | 1,897,548 |
Tetra Tech | 150,830a,b | 3,723,993 |
Thomas & Betts | 77,230a | 4,592,868 |
84,131,894 | ||
Materials—4.3% | ||
AMCOL International | 62,120 b | 2,235,078 |
Carpenter Technology | 119,610b | 5,108,543 |
10
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Materials (continued) | ||
Coeur d’Alene Mines | 160,370a,b | 5,577,669 |
Louisiana-Pacific | 423,600 a,b | 4,447,800 |
Packaging Corp. of America | 139,120 b | 4,019,177 |
Wausau Paper | 148,910b | 1,137,672 |
22,525,939 | ||
Technology—11.0% | ||
Applied Micro Circuits | 204,220 a,b | 2,119,804 |
Arris Group | 219,580a | 2,797,449 |
Aspen Technology | 273,488a,b | 4,099,585 |
Aviat Networks | 317,510a,b | 1,641,527 |
Avid Technology | 166,570a,b | 3,714,511 |
Cadence Design Systems | 625,530 a,b | 6,098,917 |
Checkpoint Systems | 115,310a,b | 2,592,169 |
CoreLogic | 262,470a,b | 4,855,695 |
Cymer | 101,810a,b | 5,760,410 |
Diebold | 140,430b | 4,979,648 |
JDA Software Group | 85,290a,b | 2,580,875 |
MKS Instruments | 59,920 | 1,995,336 |
Netgear | 24,360a | 790,238 |
NetScout Systems | 153,390a | 4,190,615 |
QLogic | 227,650a,b | 4,222,908 |
Triquint Semiconductor | 164,350 a,b | 2,121,759 |
Websense | 128,780a,b | 2,958,077 |
57,519,523 | ||
Utilities—5.1% | ||
El Paso Electric | 173,760a,b | 5,282,304 |
Hawaiian Electric Industries | 211,630 b | 5,248,424 |
NorthWestern | 143,540b | 4,349,262 |
PNM Resources | 157,170b | 2,344,976 |
Portland General Electric | 207,520 b | 4,932,750 |
WGL Holdings | 115,010b | 4,485,390 |
26,643,106 | ||
Total Common Stocks | ||
(cost $425,050,125) | 520,425,100 |
The Fund | 11 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Other Investment—.5% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | ||||
Plus Money Market Fund | ||||
(cost $2,687,401) | 2,687,401 | d | 2,687,401 | |
Investment of Cash Collateral | ||||
for Securities Loaned—24.9% | ||||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Cash | ||||
Advantage Fund | ||||
(cost $129,877,562) | 129,877,562 | d | 129,877,562 | |
Total Investments (cost $557,615,088) | 125.1 | % | 652,990,063 | |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (25.1 | %) | (130,832,459 | ) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | 522,157,604 |
a Non-income producing security. |
b Security, or portion thereof, on loan.At March 31, 2011, the value of the fund’s securities on loan was |
$126,738,717 and the value of the collateral held by the fund was $129,877,562. |
c Investment in real estate investment trust. |
d Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | |||
Value (%) | Value (%) | ||
Financial | 26.9 | Health Care | 9.5 |
Money Market Investments | 25.4 | Utilities | 5.1 |
Industrial | 16.1 | Consumer Staples | 5.0 |
Consumer Discretionary | 11.9 | Materials | 4.3 |
Technology | 11.0 | Exchange Traded Funds | .3 |
Energy | 9.6 | 125.1 | |
† Based on net assets. | |||
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Cost | Value | ||
Assets ($): | |||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments (including | |||
securities on loan, valued at $126,738,717)—Note 1(b): | |||
Unaffiliated issuers | 425,050,125 | 520,425,100 | |
Affiliated issuers | 132,564,963 | 132,564,963 | |
Cash | 656,113 | ||
Receivable for investment securities sold | 2,387,146 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 571,568 | ||
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | 39,831 | ||
Prepaid expenses | 20,395 | ||
656,665,116 | |||
Liabilities ($): | |||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(b) | 381,516 | ||
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(b) | 129,877,562 | ||
Payable for investment securities purchased | 3,894,473 | ||
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | 232,104 | ||
Accrued expenses | 121,857 | ||
134,507,512 | |||
Net Assets ($) | 522,157,604 | ||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | |||
Paid-in capital | 484,264,699 | ||
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | 723,168 | ||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (58,205,238) | ||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | |||
(depreciation) on investments | 95,374,975 | ||
Net Assets ($) | 522,157,604 | ||
Class I Shares Outstanding | |||
(unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest authorized) | 21,088,375 | ||
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($) | 24.76 | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 13 |
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends: | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 3,910,384 | |
Affiliated issuers | 6,304 | |
Income from securities lending—Note 1(b) | 48,117 | |
Total Income | 3,964,805 | |
Expenses: | ||
Investment advisory fee—Note 3(a) | 2,020,017 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(b) | 159,165 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(b) | 64,855 | |
Professional fees | 32,694 | |
Accounting and administration fees—Note 3(a) | 22,500 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(c) | 16,470 | |
Registration fees | 7,912 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 4,505 | |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 90 | |
Miscellaneous | 7,532 | |
Total Expenses | 2,335,740 | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(b) | (13) | |
Net Expenses | 2,335,727 | |
Investment Income—Net | 1,629,078 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 24,422,005 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 69,633,924 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 94,055,929 | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 95,685,007 | |
See notes to financial statements. |
14
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 1,629,078 | 2,486,948 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 24,422,005 | 58,166,999 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 69,633,924 | (11,272,810) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | 95,685,007 | 49,381,137 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | (2,300,719) | (1,329,932) | ||
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold | 32,584,541 | 78,442,990 | ||
Dividends reinvested | 1,902,140 | 1,044,363 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed | (98,105,930) | (93,644,622) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | ||||
Beneficial Interest Transactions | (63,619,249) | (14,157,269) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 29,765,039 | 33,893,936 | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 492,392,565 | 458,498,629 | ||
End of Period | 522,157,604 | 492,392,565 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | 723,168 | 1,394,809 | ||
Capital Share Transactions (Shares): | ||||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 1,421,646 | 3,915,144 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 83,795 | 55,141 | ||
Shares redeemed | (4,351,128) | (4,760,845) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (2,845,687) | (790,560) | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 15 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
Class I Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, | ||||||||||||
beginning of period | 20.57 | 18.54 | 19.85 | 25.26 | 23.70 | 22.55 | ||||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||
Investment income—netb | .07 | .10 | .11 | .18 | .16 | .09 | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 4.22 | 1.99 | (1.31) | (3.95) | 2.48 | 2.58 | ||||||
Total from Investment Operations | 4.29 | 2.09 | (1.20) | (3.77) | 2.64 | 2.67 | ||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||
Dividends from | ||||||||||||
investment income—net | (.10) | (.06) | (.11) | (.19) | (.09) | (.03) | ||||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||||
gain on investments | — | — | — | (1.45) | (.99) | (1.49) | ||||||
Total Distributions | (.10) | (.06) | (.11) | (1.64) | (1.08) | (1.52) | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period | 24.76 | 20.57 | 18.54 | 19.85 | 25.26 | 23.70 | ||||||
Total Return (%) | 20.92c | 11.27 | (5.83) | (15.38) | 11.18 | 12.42 | ||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .93d | .93 | .97 | .93 | .90e | .94e | ||||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .93d | .93 | .97 | .93 | .90e | .94e | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .65d | .52 | .76 | .85 | .61 | .40 | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 31.79c | 79.47 | 82.04 | 73 | 67f | 60f | ||||||
Net Assets, end of period | ||||||||||||
($ x 1,000) | 522,158 | 492,393 | 458,499 | 504,373 | 829,957 | 539,560 |
a | Effective September 1, 2009, the fund’s shares were redesignated as Class I shares. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Not annualized. |
d | Annualized. |
e | Includes the fund’s share of the The Boston Company Small Cap Value Portfolio’s (the “Portfolio”) allocated expenses. |
f | On September 19, 2007, the fund, which owned 100% of the Portfolio on such date, withdrew entirely from the |
Portfolio and received the Portfolio’s securities and cash in exchange for its interests in the Portfolio. Effective | |
September 20, 2007, the fund began investing directly in the securities in which the Portfolio had invested. Portfolio | |
turnover represents activity of both the fund and the Portfolio for the year ended September 30, 2007.The amounts | |
shown for 2006 are ratios for the portfolio. | |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small Cap Value Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Investment Funds (the “Trust”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering eleven series, including the fund. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term growth of capital.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.
The Trust accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no
The Fund | 17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board ofTrustees. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant American Depository Receipts and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Trustees, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
18
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of March 31, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
Level 2—Other | Level 3— | |||
Level 1— | Significant | Significant | ||
Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | ||
Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |
Assets ($) | ||||
Investments in Securities: | ||||
Equity Securities— | ||||
Domestic† | 518,860,965 | — | — | 518,860,965 |
Mutual Funds/ | ||||
Exchange | ||||
Traded Funds | 134,129,098 | — | — | 134,129,098 |
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements
The Fund | 19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at March 31, 2011.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transac-tion.Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended March 31, 2011, The Bank of New York Mellon earned $16,039 from lending portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
20
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended March 31, 2011 were as follows:
Affiliated | |||||||
Investment | Value | Value | Net | ||||
Company | 9/30/2010 | ($) | Purchases ($) | Sales ($) | 3/31/2011 | ($) Assets (%) | |
Dreyfus | |||||||
Institutional | |||||||
Preferred Plus | |||||||
Money Market | |||||||
Fund | 8,248,138 | 79,785,356 | 85,346,093 | 2,687,401 | .5 | ||
Dreyfus | |||||||
Institutional | |||||||
Cash | |||||||
Advantage | |||||||
Fund | 47,366,286 | 180,911,048 | 98,399,772 | 129,877,562 | 24.9 | ||
Total | 55,614,424 | 260,696,404 | 183,745,865 132,564,963 | 25.4 |
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
The Fund | 21 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
As of and during the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $79,247,611 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to September 30, 2010. If not applied, $61,534,792 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2017 and $17,712,819 expires in fiscal 2018.
Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years.As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryovers may be more likely to expire unused.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 was as follows: ordinary income $1,329,932. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund
22
based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing.
The average amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facilities during the period ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $12,600, with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.43%.
NOTE 3—Investment Advisory Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Manager, the investment advisory fee is computed at the annual rate of .80% of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
During the period, the Trust had an agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, pursuant to whichThe Bank of NewYork Mellon provided administration and fund accounting services for the fund. For these services the fund pays The Bank of NewYork Mellon a fixed fee plus asset and transaction based fees, as well as out-of-pocket expenses. Pursuant to this agreement, the fund was charged $22,500 during the period ended March 31, 2011 for administration and fund accounting services.
At a Board Meeting of the Trust held on February 15-16, 2011, the Board ofTrustees of theTrust terminated the agreement withThe Bank of New York Mellon and, on behalf of the Trust, entered into a Fund Accounting and Administration Agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with Dreyfus, effective May 1, 2011, whereby Dreyfus will perform administrative, accounting and recordkeeping services for the fund. The fund has agreed to compensate Dreyfus for providing accounting services, administration, compliance monitoring, regulatory and shareholder reporting, as well as related facilities, equipment and clerical help.The fee is based on the fund’s average daily net assets and computed at the following annual rates: .06% of the first $500 million, .04% of the next $500 million and .02% in excess of $1 billion.
In addition, after applying any expense limitations or fee waivers that reduce the fees paid to Dreyfus for this service, Dreyfus has contractually agreed in writing to waive any remaining fees for this service to
The Fund | 23 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
the extent that they exceed both Dreyfus’ costs in providing these services and a reasonable allocation of the costs incurred by Dreyfus and its affiliates related to the support and oversight of these services.
The fund also will reimburse Dreyfus for the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing this service for the fund.
(b) The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $3,977 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under cash management agreements for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $465 pursuant to the cash management agreements, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $13.
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $64,855 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $3,146 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: investment advisory fees $343,490, custodian fees $28,000, chief compliance officer fees $1,957 and transfer agency per account fees $8,069.
24
(c) Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (as defined in the Act) receives $60,000 per annum, plus $7,000 per joint Board meeting of the Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc., The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Tax-Free Municipal Funds and Dreyfus Funds, Inc. (collectively, the “Board Group Open-End Funds”) attended, $2,500 for separate in-person committee meetings attended which are not held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board meeting and $2,000 for Board meetings and separate committee meetings attended that are conducted by telephone. The Board Group Open-End Funds also reimburse eachTrustee who is not an “interested person” of theTrust (as defined in the Act) for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. With respect to Board meetings, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional 25% of such compensation (with the exception of reimbursable amounts).The Chair of each of the Board’s committees, unless the Chair also serves as Chair of the Board, receives $1,350 per applicable committee meeting. In the event that there is an in-person joint committee meeting or a joint telephone meeting of the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund, the $2,500 or $2,000 fee, as applicable, is allocated between the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund.These fees and expenses are charged and allocated to each series based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended March 31, 2011, amounted to $158,580,767 and $216,784,989, respectively.
At March 31, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $95,374,975, consisting of $107,928,227 gross unrealized appreciation and $12,553,252 gross unrealized depreciation.
At March 31, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
The Fund | 25 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE |
FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) |
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on February 15 and 16, 2011, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory services (the “Agreement”).The Board also considered the approval of a new Fund Accounting and Administrative Services Agreement (the “Administration Agreement” and together with the Agreement, the “Agreements”) pursuant to which Dreyfus would provide the fund with administrative services.1 The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus. In considering the renewal of the Agreement and the approval of the Administration Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below.The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund.The Board members considered information previously provided to them in presentations from representatives of Dreyfus regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and representatives of Dreyfus confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including the distribution channel(s) for the fund.
The Board members also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also would provide oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assis-
26
tance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructures. The Board also considered portfolio management’s brokerage policies and practices (including policies and practices regarding soft dollars) and the standards applied in seeking best execution.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio.The Board members reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended December 31, 2010, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Lipper as of September 30, 2010. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds.They also noted that performance generally should be considered over longer periods of time, although it is possible that long-term performance can be adversely affected by even one period of significant underperformance so that a single investment decision or theme has the ability to affect disproportionately long term performance. The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was variously above and below the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s benchmark index. Representatives of Dreyfus stated
The Fund | 27 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
that the fund’s underperformance in 2010 adversely affected the fund’s relative performance in recent periods, as compared with the Performance Group and Performance Universe, noting that the fund outperformed the fund’s benchmark index seven of the past ten calendar year periods. They emphasized that the fund’s portfolio management continued to employ the fund’s stated strategy.
The Board members also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons.They noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was above the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and the fund’s total expenses were below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
A representative of Dreyfus noted that, in connection with the Administration Agreement and its related fees, Dreyfus contractually agreed to waive any fees to the extent that such fees exceed Dreyfus’ costs in providing the services contemplated under the Administration Agreement.
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the management or investment advisory fees (1) paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund and (2) paid to Dreyfus or the Dreyfus-affiliated primary employer of the fund’s primary portfolio manager for advising any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients.They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
28
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable, given the services rendered, or to be rendered, and service levels provided, or to be provided, by Dreyfus.The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex. The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
The Board’s counsel stated that the Board members should consider the profitability analysis (1) as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreements bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders.They also noted that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus funds complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level.The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted the soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed
The Fund | 29 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreement and the approval of the Administration Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
The Board expressed its concern for the fund’s relative performance as of December 31, 2010 and agreed to closely monitor performance.
The Board concluded that the fees payable to Dreyfus were rea- sonable in light of the considerations described above.
The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreements and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year. In addition, it should be noted that the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of similar agreements during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board members and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board members’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years. The Board members determined that renewal of the Agreement and the approval of the Administration Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
1 | Until May 1, 2011, administrative services were provided pursuant to a Custody,Administration and Accounting Services Agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon. |
30
NOTES
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents | |
THE FUND | |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
12 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
13 | Statement of Operations |
14 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
16 | Financial Highlights |
19 | Notes to Financial Statements |
30 | Information About the Renewal of the Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | |
Back Cover |
Dreyfus/The Boston
Company Small/Mid Cap
Growth Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
This semiannual report for Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund covers the six-month period from October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011.
Equities throughout the world fared well over the past six months. International stock markets have rallied broadly since the fall of 2010, when new rounds of monetary stimulus from U.S. and foreign central banks gave investors confidence that the global economy was unlikely to slip back into recession. As a result, developed markets rebounded strongly from relatively depressed levels, while emerging markets added more moderately to their previous gains.Although political uprisings in the Middle East and the disasters in Japan injected some uncertainty into the investment climate, these events do not appear to have derailed the global market rally. Market sectors that tend to be sensitive to macroeconomic changes performed particularly well as commodity prices climbed and investors looked forward to better business conditions.
We currently expect most developed and emerging markets to adopt less stimulative fiscal and monetary policies over the remainder of 2011 as the global economy reaches the middle stages of its cycle. Moreover, in the wake of recent gains we believe that selectivity will become a more important determinant of investment success in international markets.We favor the core of Europe over more peripheral members of the European Union, and while we expect the emerging markets to grow faster than developed markets, the growth rate in China seems likely to moderate. As always, your financial advisor can help you align your investment portfolio with the opportunities and challenges that 2011 has in store.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
April 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011, as provided by Todd Wakefield and B. Randall Watts, Jr., Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended March 31, 2011, Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of 25.12%, Class C shares returned 24.54% and Class I shares returned 25.39%.1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Russell 2500 Growth Index (the “Index”), produced a total return of 27.41% for the same period.2
Improving economic conditions drove small- and midcap stocks higher during the reporting period.Although the fund participated to a significant degree in the market’s gains, its returns lagged the benchmark due to shortfalls in the financials and consumer discretionary sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks long-term growth of capital.To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of small-cap and mid-cap U.S. companies with market capitalizations, at the time of purchase, equal to or less than the total market capitalization of the largest company in the Index.When choosing stocks, we seek to identify high-quality small-cap and mid-cap companies with rapid current or expected earnings or revenue growth.We employ fundamental research to identify companies with attractive characteristics, such as strong business and competitive positions, solid cash flows and balance sheets, high-quality management and high sustainable growth. We also may invest in companies that our research indicates will experience accelerating revenues and expanding operating margins.
Improved Economic Confidence Fueled a Market Rally
The economic recovery gained traction in the fall of 2010 after a new round of quantitative easing of monetary policy alleviated previous concerns regarding a possible return to recession. A more optimistic investment outlook was reinforced by subsequent improvements in
The Fund | 3 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
U.S. employment and consumer spending, as well as by better-than-expected corporate earnings across a number of industry groups.
Later in the fall, the resolution of U.S. midterm elections and the passage of fiscally stimulative tax legislation lent further support to the stock market. However, the market rally was interrupted in February when political unrest in the Middle East led to sharply higher energy prices, and again in March when Japan suffered a devastating earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster. Still, stocks generally proved resilient, ending the reporting period with significant gains, on average. Small- and midcap stocks produced substantially higher returns than their large-cap counterparts over the reporting period.
Stock Selections Produced Mixed Results
The fund’s relative performance in the financials sector was undermined by some of its consumer finance and regional bank holdings. Green Dot suffered due to concerns regarding proposed government regulations designed to target prepaid debit cards, KeyCorp was hurt by larger-than-expected loan loss provisions, and Huntington Bancshares was the subject of an unfavorable legal ruling. In the consumer discretionary sector, the fund’s results compared to the benchmark were hindered by media companies, including Lions Gate Entertainment, which saw DVD sales decline as online video streaming gained popularity among consumers. In the health care sector, India-based pharmaceutical company Nektar Therapeutics reported disappointing quarterly earnings, and Salix Pharmaceuticals encountered regulatory delays in the approval of a new medicine treating irritable bowel syndrome.
The fund achieved better relative results in the consumer staples sector, where organic grocery chain Whole Foods Market benefited from rising demand as higher-end consumers returned to premium brands, and Green Mountain Coffee Roasters advanced after its announcement of a new venture in partnership with Starbucks. In the energy sector, Complete Production Services benefited from increased production of oil and natural gas in the United States, and Oil States International advanced due to strong results from its remote site accommodations business unit after a strategic acquisition. Land drilling specialist Patterson-UTI Energy experienced strong demand in the pressure pumping segment. In the materials sector, fertilizer producer CF
4
Industries Holdings benefited from favorable U.S. weather conditions and rising corn prices, which supported demand for the company’s products.
Positioned for a More Selective Environment
We expect the U.S. economic recovery to continue, which could lead to increased hiring and higher corporate earnings in a number of industries.At the same time, we are aware of potential headwinds that could dampen economic growth and earnings, including ongoing geopolitical instability and the impact of intensifying inflationary pressures on input costs for some businesses.We believe that investors are likely to become more selective in such an environment as they focus more intently on individual companies’ underlying business fundamentals and place less emphasis on macroeconomic developments.
Consequently, we have positioned the fund for additional gains in the energy sector, where we believe commodity prices are likely to remain elevated amid rising demand for a limited supply of crude oil.We have identified fewer companies meeting our investment criteria in the consumer discretionary sector.
April 15, 2011
Please note, the position in any security highlighted in italicized typeface was sold during the | |
reporting period. | |
Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment | |
style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the | |
fund’s prospectus. | |
The prices of small company stocks tend to be more volatile than the prices of large company | |
stocks, mainly because these companies have less established and more volatile earnings histories. | |
They also tend to be less liquid than larger company stocks. | |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares, or the applicable | |
contingent deferred sales charge imposed on redemptions in the case of Class C shares. Had these | |
charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future | |
results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be | |
worth more or less than their original cost. | |
2 | SOURCE: FACTSET — The Russell 2500 Growth Index is an unmanaged index that |
measures the performance of those Russell 2500 companies (the 2,500 smallest companies in the | |
Russell 3000 Index, which is composed of the 3,000 largest U. S. companies based on total | |
market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The | |
total return figure cited for this index assumes change in security prices and reinvestment of | |
dividends, but does not reflect the costs of managing a mutual fund. Investors cannot invest | |
directly in any index. |
The Fund | 5 |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund from October 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||
assuming actual returns for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 6.01 | $ | 10.75 | $ | 4.33 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,251.20 | $ | 1,245.40 | $ | 1,253.90 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 5.39 | $ | 9.65 | $ | 3.88 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,019.60 | $ | 1,015.36 | $ | 1,021.09 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.07% for Class A, 1.92% for Class C and .77% for Class I , multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks—98.1% | Shares | Value ($) |
Consumer Discretionary—15.0% | ||
Buffalo Wild Wings | 43,410a | 2,362,806 |
Choice Hotels International | 112,570 | 4,373,344 |
Guess? | 82,880 | 3,261,328 |
Iconix Brand Group | 348,710 a | 7,490,291 |
Jarden | 152,420 | 5,421,579 |
Lear | 68,250 | 3,335,377 |
Lions Gate Entertainment | 558,538 a | 3,490,863 |
PetSmart | 120,196 | 4,922,026 |
Scotts Miracle-Gro, Cl. A | 93,050 | 5,382,943 |
Tractor Supply | 73,490 | 4,399,111 |
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance | 79,980 a | 3,849,437 |
VistaPrint | 165,270 a | 8,577,513 |
Vitamin Shoppe | 109,060 a | 3,689,500 |
Williams-Sonoma | 246,920 | 10,000,260 |
Wolverine World Wide | 136,750 | 5,098,040 |
Zumiez | 115,640 a | 3,056,365 |
78,710,783 | ||
Consumer Staples—4.8% | ||
Casey’s General Stores | 93,290 b | 3,638,310 |
Estee Lauder, Cl. A | 41,550 | 4,003,758 |
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters | 87,870 a,b | 5,677,281 |
Hansen Natural | 79,760 a | 4,803,945 |
Whole Foods Market | 103,970 | 6,851,623 |
24,974,917 | ||
Energy—8.5% | ||
Brigham Exploration | 111,530 a | 4,146,685 |
Complete Production Services | 225,750 a | 7,181,107 |
Concho Resources | 35,840 a | 3,845,632 |
Oasis Petroleum | 172,070 | 5,440,853 |
Oil States International | 105,520a | 8,034,293 |
Patterson-UTI Energy | 278,230a | 8,177,180 |
Plains Exploration & Production | 209,828a | 7,602,068 |
44,427,818 |
The Fund | 7 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Exchange Traded Funds—2.6% | ||
iShares Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund | 144,920 | 13,816,673 |
Financial—6.2% | ||
Green Dot, Cl. A | 76,510 | 3,283,044 |
Huntington Bancshares | 1,104,200 | 7,331,888 |
KeyCorp | 1,057,230 | 9,388,202 |
MFA Financial | 448,510 c | 3,677,782 |
Och-Ziff Capital | ||
Management Group, Cl. A | 278,520 | 4,545,446 |
Signature Bank | 71,580 a | 4,037,112 |
32,263,474 | ||
Health Care—14.8% | ||
Alexion Pharmaceuticals | 79,380 a | 7,833,218 |
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions | 365,620a | 7,674,364 |
AmerisourceBergen | 90,630 | 3,585,323 |
Catalyst Health Solutions | 58,206 a | 3,255,462 |
Centene | 108,680 a | 3,584,266 |
Cooper | 112,047 | 7,781,664 |
Masimo | 77,090 | 2,551,679 |
PerkinElmer | 136,819 | 3,594,235 |
Pharmasset | 69,950 a | 5,505,765 |
Salix Pharmaceuticals | 93,100 a | 3,261,293 |
SXC Health Solutions | 123,230 a | 6,753,004 |
Theravance | 101,100 a,b | 2,448,642 |
Thermo Fisher Scientific | 67,740 a | 3,762,957 |
United Therapeutics | 57,844 a | 3,876,705 |
Universal Health Services, Cl. B | 108,240 | 5,348,138 |
ViroPharma | 149,050 a | 2,966,095 |
Volcano | 156,154 a | 3,997,542 |
77,780,352 | ||
Industrial—16.9% | ||
AMETEK | 179,003 | 7,852,862 |
Corporate Executive Board | 124,140 | 5,011,532 |
Crane | 107,800 | 5,220,754 |
8
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | |
Industrial (continued) | |||
EMCOR Group | 132,590a | 4,106,312 | |
EnerSys | 217,890a | 8,661,127 | |
Equifax | 68,880 | 2,675,988 | |
GeoEye | 91,490a | 3,804,154 | |
IDEX | 243,540 | 10,630,521 | |
Jacobs Engineering Group | 101,090a | 5,199,059 | |
Middleby | 46,250a | 4,311,425 | |
Mueller Industries | 146,340 | 5,358,971 | |
Roper Industries | 76,395 | 6,605,112 | |
Taleo, Cl. A | 101,970a | 3,635,231 | |
Teledyne Technologies | 78,570a | 4,062,855 | |
Thomas & Betts | 90,150a | 5,361,221 | |
Waste Connections | 127,270 | 3,664,103 | |
Werner Enterprises | 94,450 | 2,500,092 | |
88,661,319 | |||
Materials—3.3% | |||
CF Industries Holdings | 36,700 | 5,020,193 | |
FMC | 63,240 | 5,370,973 | |
Reliance Steel & Aluminum | 116,520 | 6,732,526 | |
17,123,692 | |||
Technology—25.1% | |||
Avago Technologies | 126,630 | 3,938,193 | |
Blackboard | 84,270a | 3,053,945 | |
BMC Software | 104,010a | 5,173,457 | |
CACI International, Cl. A | 130,780a | 8,019,430 | |
Commvault Systems | 230,470a | 9,191,144 | |
Constant Contact | 173,700a,b | 6,062,130 | |
Cypress Semiconductor | 172,980a | 3,352,352 | |
Fair Isaac | 129,890 | 4,105,823 | |
Harris | 129,620 | 6,429,152 | |
IAC/InterActiveCorp | 247,480a | 7,644,657 | |
Jabil Circuit | 190,081 | 3,883,355 | |
LSI | 265,440a | 1,804,992 |
The Fund | 9 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | |
Technology (continued) | |||
MAXIMUS | 56,190 | 4,560,942 | |
Netgear | 194,100a | 6,296,604 | |
OmniVision Technologies | 244,290a | 8,679,624 | |
PMC-Sierra | 491,520a | 3,686,400 | |
QLogic | 241,540a | 4,480,567 | |
Quality Systems | 34,150 | 2,846,061 | |
Quest Software | 128,510a | 3,262,869 | |
Rackspace Hosting | 101,900a,b | 4,366,415 | |
Sanmina-SCI | 268,360a | 3,008,316 | |
SuccessFactors | 210,070a | 8,211,636 | |
Synopsys | 165,270a | 4,569,716 | |
Teradata | 81,510a | 4,132,557 | |
Triquint Semiconductor | 524,890a | 6,776,330 | |
VeriFone Holdings | 68,460a | 3,761,877 | |
131,298,544 | |||
Telecommunication Services—.9% | |||
Aruba Networks | 146,020a | 4,941,317 | |
Total Common Stocks | |||
(cost $410,575,615) | 513,998,889 | ||
Other Investment—1.7% | |||
Registered Investment Company; | |||
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | |||
Plus Money Market Fund | |||
(cost $9,001,380) | 9,001,380d | 9,001,380 |
10
Investment of Cash Collateral | ||||
for Securities Loaned—2.6% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Cash | ||||
Advantage Fund | ||||
(cost $13,414,490) | 13,414,490d | 13,414,490 | ||
Total Investments (cost $432,991,485) | 102.4% | 536,414,759 | ||
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (2.4%) | (12,549,168) | ||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 523,865,591 |
a Non-income producing security. |
b Security, or portion thereof, on loan.At March 31, 2011, the value of the fund’s securities on loan was |
$13,210,228 and the value of the collateral held by the fund was $13,414,490. |
c Investment in real estate investment trust. |
d Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | |||
Value (%) | Value (%) | ||
Technology | 25.1 | Consumer Staples | 4.8 |
Industrial | 16.9 | Money Market Investments | 4.3 |
Consumer Discretionary | 15.0 | Materials | 3.3 |
Health Care | 14.8 | Exchange Traded Funds | 2.6 |
Energy | 8.5 | Telecommunication Services | .9 |
Financial | 6.2 | 102.4 |
† Based on net assets. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 11 |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Cost | Value | |||
Assets ($): | ||||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments (including | ||||
securities on loan, valued at $13,210,228)—Note 1(b): | ||||
Unaffiliated issuers | 410,575,615 | 513,998,889 | ||
Affiliated issuers | 22,415,870 | 22,415,870 | ||
Cash | 423,854 | |||
Receivable for investment securities sold | 16,478,092 | |||
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | 305,242 | |||
Dividends and interest receivable | 113,814 | |||
Prepaid expenses | 38,314 | |||
553,774,075 | ||||
Liabilities ($): | ||||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 326,510 | |||
Payable for investment securities purchased | 15,825,636 | |||
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(b) | 13,414,490 | |||
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | 240,110 | |||
Accrued expenses | 101,738 | |||
29,908,484 | ||||
Net Assets ($) | 523,865,591 | |||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||
Paid-in capital | 451,432,032 | |||
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | 116,181 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (31,105,896) | |||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 103,423,274 | |||
Net Assets ($) | 523,865,591 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share | ||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||
Net Assets ($) | 129,764,817 | 1,369,959 | 392,730,815 | |
Shares Outstanding | 8,461,864 | 91,191 | 25,492,455 | |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 15.34 | 15.02 | 15.41 | |
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends: | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 1,957,043 | |
Affiliated issuers | 9,148 | |
Income from securities lending—Note 1(b) | 106,113 | |
Total Income | 2,072,304 | |
Expenses: | ||
Investment advisory fee—Note 3(a) | 1,382,361 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 371,023 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 58,382 | |
Professional fees | 41,937 | |
Accounting and administration fee—Note 3(a) | 28,500 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 23,240 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 20,257 | |
Registration fees | 11,647 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 4,611 | |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 560 | |
Miscellaneous | 13,969 | |
Total Expenses | 1,956,487 | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(c) | (364) | |
Net Expenses | 1,956,123 | |
Investment Income—Net | 116,181 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 42,135,915 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 60,808,494 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 102,944,409 | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 103,060,590 | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 13 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 116,181 | (262,408) | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 42,135,915 | 4,889,168 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 60,808,494 | 10,238,158 | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | 103,060,590 | 14,864,918 | ||
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Class A Shares | 2,765,858 | 2,214,224 | ||
Class C Shares | 70,803 | 13,675 | ||
Class I Shares | 56,415,936 | 152,990,340 | ||
Net assets received in connection with | ||||
reorganization—Note 1 | — | 122,932,527 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Class A Shares | (7,332,032) | (6,909,828) | ||
Class C Shares | (60,180) | (96,540) | ||
Class I Shares | (33,068,579) | (52,826,717) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | ||||
Beneficial Interest Transactions | 18,791,806 | 218,317,681 | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 121,852,396 | 233,182,599 | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 402,013,195 | 168,830,596 | ||
End of Period | 523,865,591 | 402,013,195 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | 116,181 | — |
14
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Class A | ||||
Shares sold | 195,955 | 189,226 | ||
Shares issued in connection with | ||||
reorganization—Note 1 | — | 9,172,714 | ||
Shares redeemed | (529,117) | (583,665) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (333,162) | 8,778,275 | ||
Class C | ||||
Shares sold | 4,996 | 1,115 | ||
Shares issued in connection with | ||||
reorganization—Note 1 | — | 96,557 | ||
Shares redeemed | (4,284) | (8,389) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 712 | 89,283 | ||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 4,029,526 | 12,980,200 | ||
Shares issued in connection with | ||||
reorganization—Note 1 | — | 186,506 | ||
Shares redeemed | (2,379,539) | (4,509,566) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 1,649,987 | 8,657,140 | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 15 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following tables describe the performance for each share class for the fiscal periods indicated.All information (except portfolio turnover rate) reflects financial results for a single fund share.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||
Class A Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | |||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 12.26 | 11.10 | 8.36 | |||
Investment Operations: | ||||||
Investment (loss)—netb | (.01) | (.04) | (.02) | |||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 3.09 | 1.20 | 2.76 | |||
Total from Investment Operations | 3.08 | 1.16 | 2.74 | |||
Net asset value, end of period | 15.34 | 12.26 | 11.10 | |||
Total Return (%)c | 25.12d | 10.45 | 32.78d | |||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||
to average net assets | 1.07e | 1.12 | 1.26e | |||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||
to average net assets | 1.07e | 1.12 | 1.25e | |||
Ratio of net investment (loss) | ||||||
to average net assets | (.16)e | (.35) | (.37)e | |||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 84.52d | 191.46 | 278.73 | |||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 129,765 | 107,796 | 186 |
a | From March 31, 2009 (commencement of initial offering) to September 30, 2009. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
Six Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||
Class C Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | |||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 12.06 | 11.05 | 8.36 | |||
Investment Operations: | ||||||
Investment (loss)—netb | (.07) | (.13) | (.06) | |||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 3.03 | 1.14 | 2.75 | |||
Total from Investment Operations | 2.96 | 1.01 | 2.69 | |||
Net asset value, end of period | 15.02 | 12.06 | 11.05 | |||
Total Return (%)c | 24.54d | 9.14 | 32.18d | |||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||
to average net assets | 1.92e | 1.99 | 2.16e | |||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||
to average net assets | 1.92e | 1.99 | 2.00e | |||
Ratio of net investment (loss) | ||||||
to average net assets | (1.02)e | (1.21) | (1.20)e | |||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 84.52d | 191.46 | 278.73 | |||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 1,370 | 1,091 | 13 |
a | From March 31, 2009 (commencement of initial offering) to September 30, 2009. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 17 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
Class I Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, | ||||||||||||
beginning of period | 12.29 | 11.10 | 11.97 | 17.66 | 14.92 | 13.84 | ||||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||
Investment income (loss)—netb | .01 | (.01) | (.00)c | (.02) | .01 | (.02) | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 3.11 | 1.20 | (.87) | (1.93)d | 3.74d | 1.10 | ||||||
Total from Investment Operations | 3.12 | 1.19 | (.87) | (1.95) | 3.75 | 1.08 | ||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net — | — | — | (.01) | — | — | |||||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||||
gain on investments | — | — | — | (3.73) | (1.01) | — | ||||||
Total Distributions | — | — | — | (3.74) | (1.01) | — | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period | 15.41 | 12.29 | 11.10 | 11.97 | 17.66 | 14.92 | ||||||
Total Return (%) | 25.39e | 10.72 | (7.27) | (14.32) | 26.31 | 7.80f | ||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .77g | .81 | .93 | 1.11 | 1.23 | 1.29 | ||||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .77g | .81 | .93 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||||
(loss) to average net assets | .13g | (.05) | (.01) | (.15) | .07 | (.16) | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 84.52e | 191.46 | 278.73 | 201 | 180 | 161 | ||||||
Net Assets, end of period | ||||||||||||
($ x 1,000) | 392,731 | 293,126 | 168,631 | 90,267 | 22,432 | 20,389 |
a | The fund changed to a multiple class fund on March 31, 2009.The existing shares were redesignated as Class I shares. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
d | Amounts include litigation proceeds received by the fund of $.01 and $.19 per share for the years ended September |
30, 2008, and 2007, respectively. | |
e | Not annualized. |
f | For the year ended September 30, 2006, .03% of the fund’s return consisted of a payment by the investment adviser |
to compensate the fund for a trading error. Excluding this payment, total return was 7.77%. | |
g | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Investment Funds (the “Trust”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering eleven series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term growth of capital. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of NewYork Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
As of the close of business on April 29, 2010, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization previously approved by the fund’s Board of Trustees, all of the assets, subject to the liabilities, of Dreyfus Discovery Fund (“Discovery Fund”), a series of Dreyfus Funds, Inc., were transferred to the fund in exchange for a corresponding class of shares of Beneficial Interest of the fund of equal value. Shareholders of Class A, Class B and Class F shares of Discovery Fund received Class A shares of the fund and shareholders of Class C and Class I shares of Discovery Fund received Class C and Class I shares of the fund, respectively, in each case in an amount equal to the aggregate net asset value of their investment in Discovery Fund at the time of the exchange.The exchange ratio for Class A, Class B, Class C, Class F and Class I shares are 2.10, 1.91, 1.95, 2.13 and 2.16, respectively.The net asset value of the fund’s shares on the close of business April 29, 2010, after the reorganization was $13.00 for Class A, $12.84 for Class C and $13.02 for Class I shares, and a total of 9,172,714 Class A shares, 96,557 Class C shares and 186,506 Class I shares were issued to shareholders of Discovery Fund in the exchange. The exchange was a tax-free event to the Discovery Fund shareholders. For financial reporting purposes, assets received and shares issued by the fund were recorded at fair value; however, the cost basis of investments received from Discovery Fund was carried forward to align ongoing reporting of the fund’s realized and unrealized gains and losses with amounts distributable to shareholders for tax purposes.
The Fund | 19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The net assets and net unrealized appreciation immediately before the acquisition were as follows:
Unrealized | Net | |
Appreciation ($) | Assets ($) | |
Dreyfus Discovery Fund-Target Fund | 9,102,488 | 122,932,527 |
Dreyfus/The Boston Company Small/ | ||
Mid Cap Growth Fund—Acquiring Fund | 36,200,644 | 226,305,289 |
Total | 45,303,132 | 349,237,816 |
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares.The fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class C and Class I shares. Class A shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class I shares are sold primarily to bank trust departments and other financial service providers (including The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus), acting on behalf of customers having a qualified trust or an investment account or relationship at such institution, and bear no distribution or shareholder services fees. Class I shares are offered without a front-end sales charge or CDSC. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The Trust accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
20
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market),but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board ofTrustees. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and
The Fund | 21 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant American Depository Receipts and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Trustees, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
22
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of March 31, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
Level 2—Other | Level 3— | |||
Level 1— | Significant | Significant | ||
Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | ||
Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |
Assets ($) | ||||
Investments in Securities: | ||||
Equity Securities— | ||||
Domestic† | 491,604,703 | — | — | 491,604,703 |
Equity Securities— | ||||
Foreign† | 8,577,513 | — | — | 8,577,513 |
Mutual Funds/ | ||||
Exchange | ||||
Traded Funds | 36,232,543 | — | — | 36,232,543 |
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at March 31, 2011.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It
The Fund | 23 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
is the fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit. The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended March 31, 2011,The Bank of NewYork Mellon earned $35,371 from lending portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended March 31, 2011 were as follows:
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid
24
annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $70,686,379 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to September 30, 2010. If not applied, $19,897,540 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2015, $32,737,978 expires in fiscal 2016, $9,601,514 expires in fiscal 2017 and $8,449,347 expires in fiscal 2018.
Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the
The Fund | 25 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years.As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryovers may be more likely to expire unused.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund did not borrow under the Facilities.
NOTE 3—Investment Advisory Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Manager, the investment advisory fee is computed at the annual rate of .60% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
During the period, the Trust had an agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, pursuant to which The Bank of New York Mellon provided administration and fund accounting services for the fund. For these services, the fund pays The Bank of NewYork Mellon a fixed fee plus asset and transaction based fees, as well as out-of-pocket expenses. Pursuant to this agreement, the fund was charged $28,500 for the period ended March 31, 2011 for administration and fund accounting services.
At a Board Meeting of the Trust held on February 15-16, 2011, the Board of Trustees of the Trust terminated the agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon and, on behalf of the Trust, entered into a Fund Accounting and Administration Agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with Dreyfus, effective May 1, 2011, whereby Dreyfus will perform administrative, accounting and recordkeeping services for
26
the fund. The fund has agreed to compensate Dreyfus for providing accounting services, administration, compliance monitoring, regulatory and shareholder reporting, as well as related facilities, equipment and clerical help.The fee is based on the fund’s average daily net assets and computed at the following annual rates: .06% of the first $500 million, .04% of the next $500 million and .02% in excess of $1 billion.
In addition, after applying any expense limitations or fee waivers that reduce the fees paid to Dreyfus for this service, Dreyfus has contractually agreed in writing to waive any remaining fees for this service to the extent that they exceed both Dreyfus’ costs in providing these services and a reasonable allocation of the costs incurred by Dreyfus and its affiliates related to the support and oversight of these services.
The fund also will reimburse Dreyfus for the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing this service for the fund.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the Distributor retained $61 from commissions earned on sales of the fund’s Class A shares.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing its shares at an annual rate of .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. During the period ended March 31, 2011, Class C shares were charged $4,611 pursuant to the Plan.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A and Class C shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of .25% of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts.The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services.The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended March 31, 2011, Class A and Class C shares were charged $148,674 and $1,537, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The Fund | 27 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $83,568 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under cash management agreements for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $12,638 pursuant to the cash management agreements, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $364.
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $58,382 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $3,146 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: investment advisory fees $257,089, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $853, shareholder services plan fees $26,960, custodian fees $29,800, chief compliance officer fees $1,957 and transfer agency per account fees $9,851.
(d) Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (as defined in the Act) receives $60,000 per annum, plus $7,000 per joint Board meeting of the Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc., The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Tax-Free Municipal
28
Funds and Dreyfus Funds, Inc. (collectively, the “Board Group Open-End Funds”) attended, $2,500 for separate in-person committee meetings attended which are not held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board meeting and $2,000 for Board meetings and separate committee meetings attended that are conducted by telephone. The Board Group Open-End Funds also reimburse eachTrustee who is not an “interested person” of theTrust (as defined in the Act) for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. With respect to Board meetings, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional 25% of such compensation (with the exception of reimbursable amounts).The Chair of each of the Board’s committees, unless the Chair also serves as Chair of the Board, receives $1,350 per applicable committee meeting. In the event that there is an in-person joint committee meeting or a joint telephone meeting of the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund, the $2,500 or $2,000 fee, as applicable, is allocated between the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund. The Trust’s portion of these fees and expenses are charged and allocated to each series based on net assets. Amounts required to be paid by theTrust directly to the non-interested Trustees, that would be applied to offset a portion of the management fee payable to the Manager, are in fact paid directly by the Manager to the non-interested Trustees.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended March 31, 2011, amounted to $393,384,799 and $382,477,068, respectively.
At March 31, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $103,423,274, consisting of $108,221,027 gross unrealized appreciation and $4,797,753 gross unrealized depreciation.
At March 31, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
The Fund | 29 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) |
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on February 15 and 16, 2011, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory services (the “Agreement”).The Board also considered the approval of a new Fund Accounting and Administrative Services Agreement (the “Administration Agreement” and together with the Agreement, the “Agreements”) pursuant to which Dreyfus would provide the fund with administrative services.1 The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus. In considering the renewal of the Agreement and the approval of the Administration Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below.The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund.The Board members considered information previously provided to them in presentations from representatives of Dreyfus regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and representatives of Dreyfus confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including the distribution channel(s) for the fund.
The Board members also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also would provide oversight of day-to-day
30
fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements. The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructures. The Board also considered portfolio management’s brokerage policies and practices (including policies and practices regarding soft dollars) and the standards applied in seeking best execution.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio.The Board members reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended December 31, 2010, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Lipper as of September 30, 2010. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds.They also noted that performance generally should be considered over longer periods of time, although it is possible that long-term performance can be adversely affected by even one period of significant underperformance so that a single investment decision or theme has the ability to affect disproportionately long term perfor-mance.The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was variously above and
The Fund | 31 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
below the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians for the various periods. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s benchmark index.
The Board members also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons.They noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and the fund’s total expenses were below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
A representative of Dreyfus noted that, in connection with the Administration Agreement and its related fees, Dreyfus contractually agreed to waive any fees to the extent that such fees exceed Dreyfus’ costs in providing the services contemplated under the Administration Agreement.
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the management or investment advisory fees (1) paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund and (2) paid to Dreyfus or the Dreyfus-affiliated primary employer of the fund’s primary portfolio manager for advising any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients.They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable, given
32
the services rendered, or to be rendered, and service levels provided, or to be provided, by Dreyfus.The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex. The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
The Board’s counsel stated that the Board members should consider the profitability analysis (1) as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreements bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders.They also noted that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus funds complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted the soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreement and the approval of the Administration Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
The Board generally was satisfied with the fund’s overall performance, in light of the considerations described above.
The Fund | 33 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
The Board concluded that the fees payable to Dreyfus were rea- sonable in light of the considerations described above.
The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreements and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year. In addition, it should be noted that the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of similar agreements during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board members and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board members’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years. The Board members determined that renewal of the Agreement and approval of the Administration Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
1 | Until May 1, 2011, administrative services were provided pursuant to a Custody,Administration and Accounting Services Agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon. |
34
NOTES
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents | |
THE FUND | |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
19 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
20 | Statement of Operations |
21 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
23 | Financial Highlights |
26 | Notes to Financial Statements |
35 | Information About the Renewal of the Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | |
Back Cover |
Dreyfus/Standish
Intermediate Tax Exempt
Bond Fund
The
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
This semiannual report for Dreyfus/Standish IntermediateTax Exempt Bond Fund covers the six-month period from October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011.
The past six months proved to be a volatile period for municipal bonds. Fixed-income securities generally encountered heightened volatility when a new round of monetary stimulus suggested that the economy was likely to gain strength, kindling concerns regarding potentially higher interest rates down the road. At the same time, municipal bonds responded negatively to reports of budget stresses affecting most state and local governments, as well as the end of the federally subsidized Build America Bonds program.
We believe that municipal bonds have become more attractively valued in the wake of recent market volatility. Despite negative media coverage of the risks confronting the market, we believe that the vast majority of issuers will continue to service their debt without interruption. In our analysis, fundamental measures of quality — including liquidity and revenue stabilization — support a stable outlook for tax-backed and revenue-backed municipal bonds. Over the longer term, we believe that higher tax rates in many states will provide additional support to municipal bond prices. As always, your financial advisor can help you align your investment portfolio with the opportunities and challenges that the future may have in store.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
April 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011, as provided by Christine Todd, CFA, Steven Harvey, and Thomas Casey, Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended March 31, 2011, Dreyfus/Standish Intermediate Tax Exempt Bond Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of –2.08%, Class C shares returned –2.45% and Class I shares returned –1.90%.1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Barclays Capital 3-, 5-, 7-, 10-Year Municipal Bond Index (the “Index”), provided a total return of –1.41% for the same period.2
Municipal bonds encountered heightened volatility during the reporting period amid rising long-term interest rates, intensifying credit concerns and changing supply-and-demand dynamics.The fund produced lower returns than its benchmark, primarily due to overweighted exposure to longer-term municipal bonds and a relatively light position in escrowed bonds.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks to provide a high level of interest income exempt from federal income tax, while seeking preservation of shareholders’ capital.To pursue this goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds that provide income exempt from federal personal income tax.
The fund invests exclusively in fixed-income securities rated, at the time of purchase, investment grade or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus, with an emphasis on high grade securities.3 The dollar weighted average effective maturity of the fund’s portfolio generally will be between three and 10 years, but the fund may invest in individual securities of any maturity.We focus on identifying undervalued sectors and securities, and we minimize the use of interest rate forecasting.We select municipal bonds by using fundamental credit analysis to estimate the relative value and attractiveness of various sectors and securities and to exploit pricing inefficiencies in the municipal bond market. We actively trade among various sectors, such as pre-refunded, general obligation and revenue bonds, based on their apparent relative values.
The Fund | 3 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
Changing Market Forces Derailed Municipal Bonds
The U.S. economic recovery gained traction in the fall of 2010 after a new round of quantitative easing of monetary policy eased investors’ economic worries and stoked renewed inflation concerns. As a result, interest rates climbed at the longer end of the market’s maturity range, and bond prices fell. Indeed, the fourth quarter of 2010 ranked as the worst quarter for municipal bond market performance since 1994.
In addition, the market’s supply-and-demand dynamics deteriorated as it became clearer that the federal Build America Bonds program, which had shifted a substantial portion of new issuance to the taxable bond market, would be allowed to expire at the end of 2010. Consequently, investors sold longer-maturity municipal bonds in anticipation of a surge in the supply of newly issued securities as states and municipalities rushed to lock in federal subsidies toward year-end. Finally, most states continued to struggle with fiscal pressures, which were highlighted by news reports about state budget cuts and other austerity measures.
The market showed signs of stabilization in early 2011 when the supply of newly issued municipal bonds declined sharply after the glut of issuance in the previous quarter. In addition, demand for tax-exempt securities recovered when individuals and non-traditional investors, such as hedge funds, regarded municipal bonds as inexpensively valued compared to U.S.Treasury securities.
Longer-Term Holdings Dampened Relative Returns
The fund’s relative performance was undermined by overweighted exposure to securities at the longer end of the intermediate-term range, which bore the brunt of rising long-term interest rates early in the reporting period.Although these holdings later recovered some of their losses, it was not enough to fully offset earlier weakness. In addition, the fund’s relative performance suffered from an underweighted position in municipal bonds for which the funds for early redemption have been placed in escrow. These traditionally defensive investments held up relatively well in the volatile market environment. Finally, the fund’s overweighted exposure to bonds backed by revenues from hospitals and airports undermined results compared to the benchmark.
On a more positive note, the fund benefited from our efforts to upgrade its overall credit quality in the weeks prior to the reporting
4
period, when we exited positions in municipal bonds—such as those backed by hospitals and the states’ settlement of litigation with U.S. tobacco companies—that were among the harder hit market segments. We redeployed those assets to AAA-rated general obligation bonds and securities backed by revenues from facilities providing essential municipal services, which helped support the fund’s relative performance during the market downturn.
Weathering a Period of Transition
We have been encouraged by recent signs of market stabilization, including a rebound in investor demand.Although we expect additional bouts of market volatility over the near term, we remain optimistic over the longer term. Once the transition to a more ample supply of tax-exempt securities is complete, demand seems likely to stay robust as investors respond to higher state taxes and possible federal tax increases down the road.
April 15, 2011
Bond funds are subject generally to interest rate, credit, liquidity and market risks, to varying | |
degrees, all of which are more fully described in the fund’s prospectus. Generally, all other factors | |
being equal, bond prices are inversely related to interest-rate changes, and rate increases can cause | |
price declines. | |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares. Had these charges | |
been reflected, returns would have been lower. Class I shares are not subject to any initial or | |
deferred sales charge. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Share price, yield and | |
investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less | |
than their original cost. Income may be subject to state and local taxes, and some income may be | |
subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) for certain investors. Capital gains, if any, | |
are taxable. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus | |
Corporation, pursuant to an agreement in effect through February 1, 2012, at which time it may | |
be extended, modified or terminated. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s returns | |
would have been lower. | |
2 | SOURCE: FactSet — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital gain |
distributions.The Barclays Capital 3-, 5-, 7-, 10-Year Municipal Bond Index, an equal-weighted | |
composite of the Barclays Capital 3-year, 5-Year, 7-Year and 10-Year Municipal Bond indices, | |
each of which is a broad measure of the performance of investment-grade, fixed-rate municipal | |
bonds. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. | |
3 | The fund may continue to own investment-grade bonds (at the time of purchase), which are |
subsequently downgraded to below investment grade. |
The Fund | 5 |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus/Standish IntermediateTax Exempt Bond Fund from October 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||
assuming actual returns for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 3.95 | $ | 7.63 | $ | 2.22 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 979.20 | $ | 975.50 | $ | 981.00 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 4.03 | $ | 7.80 | $ | 2.27 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,020.94 | $ | 1,017.20 | $ | 1,022.69 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .80% for Class A, 1.55% for Class C and .45% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments—97.8% | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Alabama—2.0% | ||||
Alabama Public School and College | ||||
Authority, Capital Improvement | ||||
Revenue | 5.00 | 5/1/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,084,400 |
Birmingham Water Works Board, | ||||
Water Revenue (Insured; | ||||
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 1/1/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,103,750 |
Alaska—1.0% | ||||
Alaska Student Loan Corporation, | ||||
Education Loan Revenue | 5.25 | 6/1/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,085,800 |
Arizona—.8% | ||||
Pima County Industrial Development | ||||
Authority, Education Revenue | ||||
(American Charter Schools | ||||
Foundation Project) | 5.13 | 7/1/15 | 870,000 | 859,490 |
California—15.9% | ||||
California, | ||||
Economic Recovery Bonds | 5.00 | 7/1/18 | 1,500,000 | 1,678,545 |
California, | ||||
GO | 5.00 | 10/1/11 | 70,000 | 70,242 |
California, | ||||
GO (Insured; AMBAC) | 6.00 | 4/1/16 | 1,000,000 | 1,158,960 |
California, | ||||
GO (Insured; AMBAC) | 6.00 | 2/1/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,163,940 |
California, | ||||
GO (Various Purpose) | 5.00 | 10/1/17 | 1,500,000 | 1,672,695 |
California Department of Water | ||||
Resources, Power Supply Revenue | 5.00 | 5/1/14 | 1,250,000 | 1,385,400 |
California Department of Water | ||||
Resources, Power Supply Revenue | 5.00 | 5/1/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,128,990 |
California Housing Finance Agency, | ||||
Home Mortgage Revenue | ||||
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | ||||
Municipal Corp.) | 5.13 | 8/1/18 | 1,250,000 | 1,233,025 |
California Statewide Communities | ||||
Development Authority, Revenue | ||||
(Kaiser Permanente) | 5.00 | 4/1/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,085,110 |
Golden State Tobacco | ||||
Securitization Corporation, | ||||
Enhanced Tobacco Settlement | ||||
Asset-Backed Bonds | ||||
(Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 6/1/20 | 500,000 | 493,105 |
The Fund 7
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
California (continued) | ||||
Golden State Tobacco | ||||
Securitization Corporation, | ||||
Enhanced Tobacco Settlement | ||||
Asset-Backed Bonds | ||||
(Insured; AMBAC) | 4.60 | 6/1/23 | 750,000 | 683,303 |
Sacramento County, | ||||
Airport System Senior Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/22 | 1,275,000 | 1,293,870 |
Southern California Public Power | ||||
Authority, Revenue (Canyon | ||||
Power Project) | 5.00 | 7/1/22 | 2,000,000 | 2,121,280 |
Southern California Public Power | ||||
Authority, Revenue (Windy | ||||
Point/Windy Flats Project) | 5.00 | 7/1/23 | 1,000,000 | 1,067,450 |
Tuolumne Wind Project Authority, | ||||
Revenue (Tuolumne | ||||
Company Project) | 5.00 | 1/1/18 | 1,000,000 | 1,089,120 |
Colorado—3.4% | ||||
Colorado Housing and Finance | ||||
Authority, Single Family | ||||
Program Senior and | ||||
Subordinate Bonds | 6.80 | 2/1/31 | 915,000 | 934,901 |
Colorado Housing and Finance | ||||
Authority, Single Family | ||||
Program Senior and Subordinate | ||||
Bonds (Collateralized; FHA) | 6.60 | 8/1/32 | 585,000 | 618,977 |
Platte River Power Authority, | ||||
Power Revenue (Insured; | ||||
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 6/1/13 | 2,000,000 | 2,178,560 |
Florida—12.6% | ||||
Broward County School Board, | ||||
COP (Master Lease Purchase | ||||
Agreement) (Insured; National | ||||
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,064,310 |
Citizens Property Insurance | ||||
Corporation, High-Risk Account | ||||
Senior Secured Revenue | ||||
(Insured; National Public | ||||
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 3/1/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,052,280 |
8
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Florida (continued) | ||||
Citizens Property Insurance | ||||
Corporation, High-Risk Account | ||||
Senior Secured Revenue | ||||
(Insured; National Public | ||||
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 3/1/15 | 2,000,000 | 2,104,060 |
Florida Housing Finance | ||||
Corporation, Homeowner | ||||
Mortgage Revenue (Insured; | ||||
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.75 | 1/1/17 | 5,000 | 5,000 |
Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund | ||||
Finance Corporation, Revenue | 5.25 | 7/1/12 | 1,000,000 | 1,049,900 |
Hillsborough County, | ||||
Capacity Assessment Special | ||||
Assessment Revenue (Insured; | ||||
National Public Finance | ||||
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 3/1/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,051,310 |
Lakeland, | ||||
Energy System Revenue | ||||
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | ||||
Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 10/1/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,092,610 |
Miami-Dade County, | ||||
Aviation Revenue (Miami | ||||
International Airport) | 5.25 | 10/1/23 | 1,000,000 | 1,032,240 |
Miami-Dade County, | ||||
Water and Sewer System Revenue | ||||
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | ||||
Municipal Corp.) | 5.25 | 10/1/19 | 2,000,000 | 2,227,420 |
Orlando Utilities Commission, | ||||
Utility System Revenue | 5.00 | 10/1/14 | 100,000 | 112,182 |
Orlando-Orange County Expressway | ||||
Authority, Revenue (Insured; | ||||
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/18 | 1,000,000 | 1,079,710 |
South Miami Health Facilities | ||||
Authority, HR (Baptist Health | ||||
South Florida Obligated Group) | 5.00 | 8/15/18 | 750,000 | 808,313 |
Tampa, | ||||
Health System Revenue (BayCare | ||||
Health System Issue) | 5.00 | 11/15/18 | 1,000,000 | 1,079,620 |
The Fund | 9 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Georgia—2.1% | ||||
Atlanta, | ||||
Airport General Revenue | 5.00 | 1/1/16 | 1,000,000 | 1,097,640 |
Atlanta, | ||||
Water and Wastewater Revenue | 6.00 | 11/1/20 | 1,000,000 | 1,133,640 |
Hawaii—2.0% | ||||
Hawaii, | ||||
Harbor System Revenue | ||||
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | ||||
Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 1/1/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,056,570 |
Honolulu City and County Board of | ||||
Water Supply, Water System | ||||
Revenue (Insured; National | ||||
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,089,820 |
Illinois—7.6% | ||||
Chicago, | ||||
GO (Insured; Assured Guaranty | ||||
Municipal Corp.) | 5.50 | 1/1/19 | 2,000,000 | 2,132,860 |
Cook County Community High School | ||||
District Number 219, GO School | ||||
Bonds (Insured; FGIC) | 7.88 | 12/1/14 | 100,000 | 124,271 |
Cook County Community High School | ||||
District Number 219, GO School | ||||
Bonds (Insured; National | ||||
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 7.88 | 12/1/14 | 650,000 | 771,647 |
Illinois, | ||||
GO | 5.00 | 1/1/18 | 1,000,000 | 1,036,420 |
Illinois, | ||||
GO | 5.00 | 1/1/20 | 500,000 | 498,910 |
Illinois, | ||||
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.00 | 6/15/15 | 1,000,000 | 1,080,560 |
Northern Illinois University Board | ||||
of Trustees, Auxiliary | ||||
Facilities System Revenue | ||||
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | ||||
Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 4/1/17 | 1,500,000 | 1,597,920 |
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement | ||||
Authority, Tobacco | ||||
Settlement Revenue | 5.00 | 6/1/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,032,040 |
10
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | ||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | |
Indiana—1.0% | |||||
Indianapolis Airport Authority, | |||||
Special Facilities Revenue | |||||
(Federal Express | |||||
Corporation Project) | 5.10 | 1/15/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,076,620 | |
Louisiana—1.5% | |||||
Parish of Orleans Parishwide | |||||
School District, GO (Insured; | |||||
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 4.00 | 9/1/14 | 1,500,000 | 1,584,465 | |
Maryland—1.4% | |||||
Anne Arundel County, | |||||
GO | 5.00 | 3/1/13 | 500,000 | 541,650 | |
Maryland Economic Development | |||||
Corporation, EDR | |||||
(Transportation Facilities Project) | 5.13 | 6/1/20 | 1,000,000 | 964,420 | |
Massachusetts—3.6% | |||||
Massachusetts, | |||||
GO (Consolidated Loan) | |||||
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | |||||
Municipal Corp.) (Prerefunded) | 5.00 | 3/1/15 | 1,000,000 | a | 1,140,380 |
Massachusetts Department of | |||||
Transportation, Metropolitan | |||||
Highway System Senior Revenue | 5.00 | 1/1/15 | 1,500,000 | 1,643,535 | |
Massachusetts Health and | |||||
Educational Facilities | |||||
Authority, Revenue (Lahey | |||||
Clinic Medical Center Issue) | |||||
(Insured; National Public | |||||
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 8/15/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,071,730 | |
Michigan—3.9% | |||||
Detroit, | |||||
Sewage Disposal System Second | |||||
Lien Revenue (Insured; | |||||
National Public Finance | |||||
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,057,260 | |
Detroit, | |||||
Sewage Disposal System Senior | |||||
Lien Revenue (Insured; Assured | |||||
Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.25 | 7/1/19 | 1,000,000 | 1,066,040 |
The Fund | 11 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Michigan (continued) | ||||
Detroit School District, | ||||
School Building and Site | ||||
Improvement Bonds (Insured; | ||||
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 5/1/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,049,270 |
Wayne County Airport Authority, | ||||
Airport Revenue (Detroit | ||||
Metropolitan Wayne | ||||
County Airport) | 5.00 | 12/1/16 | 1,000,000 | 1,035,780 |
New Jersey—4.8% | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development | ||||
Authority, School Facilities | ||||
Construction Revenue | 5.00 | 9/1/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,068,080 |
New Jersey Economic Development | ||||
Authority, School Facilities | ||||
Construction Revenue | 5.00 | 9/1/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,068,080 |
New Jersey Economic Development | ||||
Authority, Water Facilities | ||||
Revenue (New Jersey—American | ||||
Water Company, Inc. Project) | 5.10 | 6/1/23 | 1,000,000 | 1,016,780 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities | ||||
Financing Authority, Revenue | ||||
(Holy Name Medical Center Issue) | 5.00 | 7/1/16 | 1,000,000 | 1,007,730 |
New Jersey Transportation | ||||
Trust Fund Authority | ||||
(Transportation System) | 5.00 | 12/15/16 | 1,000,000 | 1,080,570 |
New Mexico—1.4% | ||||
Jicarilla, | ||||
Apache Nation Revenue | 5.00 | 9/1/13 | 380,000 | 397,944 |
New Mexico, | ||||
Severance Tax Bonds | 5.00 | 7/1/15 | 1,000,000 | 1,137,150 |
New York—7.0% | ||||
Metropolitan Transportation | ||||
Authority, Transportation | ||||
Revenue | 5.25 | 11/15/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,111,810 |
New York City, | ||||
GO | 5.00 | 8/1/21 | 2,000,000 | 2,161,940 |
New York City Health and Hospitals | ||||
Corporation, Health | ||||
System Revenue | 5.00 | 2/15/19 | 1,000,000 | 1,095,190 |
12
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
New York (continued) | ||||
New York City Industrial | ||||
Development Agency, Special | ||||
Facility Revenue (Terminal One | ||||
Group Association, L.P. Project) | 5.50 | 1/1/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,075,340 |
New York State Dormitory | ||||
Authority, Third General | ||||
Resolution Revenue (State | ||||
University Educational | ||||
Facilities Issue) | 5.25 | 5/15/12 | 1,000,000 | 1,047,410 |
Port Authority of New York and | ||||
New Jersey (Consolidated | ||||
Bonds, 139th Series) | ||||
(Insured; National | ||||
Public Finance | ||||
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 10/1/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,080,820 |
Ohio—1.9% | ||||
Cleveland, | ||||
Waterworks Improvement First | ||||
Mortgage Revenue (Insured; | ||||
National Public Finance | ||||
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.50 | 1/1/13 | 535,000 | 552,960 |
Franklin County, | ||||
Revenue (Trinity Health | ||||
Credit Group) | 5.00 | 6/1/14 | 1,340,000 | 1,465,183 |
Pennsylvania—2.0% | ||||
Pennsylvania Intergovernmental | ||||
Cooperation Authority, Special | ||||
Tax Revenue (City of | ||||
Philadelphia Funding Program) | 5.00 | 6/15/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,135,520 |
Philadelphia School District, | ||||
GO | 5.00 | 9/1/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,081,810 |
Rhode Island—.1% | ||||
Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage | ||||
Finance Corporation, Homeownership | ||||
Opportunity Bonds | 4.95 | 10/1/16 | 75,000 | 75,117 |
South Dakota—2.5% | ||||
South Dakota Conservancy District, | ||||
Revenue (State Revolving | ||||
Fund Program) | 5.00 | 8/1/17 | 2,370,000 | 2,708,554 |
The Fund | 13 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | ||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | |
Texas—9.1% | |||||
Dallas Independent School | |||||
District, Unlimited Tax School | |||||
Building Bonds (Permament | |||||
School Fund Guarantee Program) | 5.25 | 2/15/16 | 1,000,000 | 1,156,330 | |
Harris County Health Facilities | |||||
Development Corporation, HR | |||||
(Memorial Hospital System | |||||
Project) (Insured; National | |||||
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 6.00 | 6/1/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,078,720 | |
Lower Colorado River Authority, | |||||
Revenue | 5.00 | 5/15/15 | 1,000,000 | 1,118,750 | |
Midlothian Development Authority, | |||||
Tax Increment Contract Revenue | |||||
(Insured; Radian) | 5.00 | 11/15/13 | 530,000 | 540,266 | |
Pasadena Independent School | |||||
District, Unlimited Tax School | |||||
Building Bonds (Permanent | |||||
School Fund Guarantee Program) | 5.00 | 2/15/15 | 1,000,000 | 1,131,580 | |
San Antonio, | |||||
Airport System Revenue | |||||
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | |||||
Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,071,850 | |
San Manuel Entertainment | |||||
Authority, Public Improvement | |||||
Revenue | 4.50 | 12/1/16 | 1,000,000 | 890,380 | |
Stafford Economic Development | |||||
Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue | |||||
(Insured; National Public | |||||
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 6.00 | 9/1/15 | 525,000 | 602,674 | |
Texas, | |||||
GO (College Student Loan) | 5.00 | 8/1/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,101,450 | |
Texas Municipal Power Agency, | |||||
Revenue (Insured; National | |||||
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 0.00 | 9/1/16 | 10,000 | b | 8,946 |
Texas Transportation Commission, | |||||
State Highway Fund | |||||
First Tier Revenue | 5.00 | 4/1/16 | 1,000,000 | 1,144,120 |
14
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Utah—.0% | ||||
Utah Housing Finance Agency, | ||||
SMFR (Collateralized; FHA) | 5.40 | 7/1/20 | 40,000 | 40,026 |
Washington—3.1% | ||||
Energy Northwest, | ||||
Electric Revenue (Columbia | ||||
Generating Station) | 5.50 | 7/1/15 | 1,000,000 | 1,151,810 |
Energy Northwest, | ||||
Electric Revenue | ||||
(Project Three) | 5.00 | 7/1/15 | 1,000,000 | 1,131,430 |
NJB Properties, | ||||
LR (King County, | ||||
Washington Project) | 5.00 | 12/1/14 | 1,000,000 | 1,120,210 |
Wyoming—1.0% | ||||
Wyoming Community Development | ||||
Authority, Housing Revenue | 5.50 | 12/1/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,060,700 |
U.S. Related—6.1% | ||||
Puerto Rico Electric Power | ||||
Authority, Power Revenue | ||||
(Insured; XLCA) | 5.50 | 7/1/16 | 500,000 | 543,300 |
Puerto Rico Government | ||||
Development Bank, | ||||
Senior Notes | 5.25 | 1/1/15 | 600,000 | 618,984 |
Puerto Rico Highways and | ||||
Transportation Authority, | ||||
Highway Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/16 | 1,000,000 | 1,034,900 |
Puerto Rico Highways and | ||||
Transportation Authority, | ||||
Transportation Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/13 | 1,750,000 | 1,832,967 |
Puerto Rico Public Buildings | ||||
Authority, Government | ||||
Facilities Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/12 | 1,000,000 | 1,019,310 |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing | ||||
Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue | ||||
(First Subordinate Series) | 5.50 | 8/1/22 | 1,500,000 | 1,589,595 |
Total Long-Term Municipal Investments | ||||
(cost $104,178,851) | 106,189,602 |
The Fund | 15 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Short-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | ||
Investments—1.0% | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | |
New York; | |||||
New York City, | |||||
GO Notes (LOC; | |||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank) | |||||
(cost $1,100,000) | 0.20 | 4/1/11 | 1,100,000c | 1,100,000 | |
Total Investments (cost $105,278,851) | 98.8% | 107,289,602 | |||
Cash and Receivables (Net) | 1.2% | 1,266,053 | |||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 108,555,655 |
a This security is prerefunded; the date shown represents the prerefunded date. Bonds which are prerefunded are |
collateralized by U.S. Government securities which are held in escrow and are used to pay principal and interest on |
the municipal issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date. |
b Security issued with a zero coupon. Income is recognized through the accretion of discount. |
c Variable rate demand note—rate shown is the interest rate in effect at March 31, 2011. Maturity date represents the |
next demand date, or the ultimate maturity date if earlier. |
16
Summary of Abbreviations | |||
ABAG | Association of Bay Area Governments | ACA | American Capital Access |
AGC | ACE Guaranty Corporation | AGIC | Asset Guaranty Insurance Company |
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond | ARRN | Adjustable Rate Receipt Notes |
Assurance Corporation | |||
BAN | Bond Anticipation Notes | BPA | Bond Purchase Agreement |
CIFG | CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty | COP | Certificate of Participation |
CP | Commercial Paper | EDR | Economic Development Revenue |
EIR | Environmental Improvement Revenue | FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance |
Company | |||
FHA | Federal Housing Administration | FHLB | Federal Home Loan Bank |
FHLMC | Federal Home Loan Mortgage | FNMA | Federal National |
Corporation | Mortgage Association | ||
GAN | Grant Anticipation Notes | GIC | Guaranteed Investment Contract |
GNMA | Government National | GO | General Obligation |
Mortgage Association | |||
HR | Hospital Revenue | IDB | Industrial Development Board |
IDC | Industrial Development Corporation | IDR | Industrial Development Revenue |
LOC | Letter of Credit | LOR | Limited Obligation Revenue |
LR | Lease Revenue | MFHR | Multi-Family Housing Revenue |
MFMR | Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue | PCR | Pollution Control Revenue |
PILOT | Payment in Lieu of Taxes | PUTTERS Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts | |
RAC | Revenue Anticipation Certificates | RAN | Revenue Anticipation Notes |
RAW | Revenue Anticipation Warrants | RRR | Resources Recovery Revenue |
SAAN | State Aid Anticipation Notes | SBPA | Standby Bond Purchase Agreement |
SFHR | Single Family Housing Revenue | SFMR | Single Family Mortgage Revenue |
SONYMA | State of New York Mortgage Agency | SWDR | Solid Waste Disposal Revenue |
TAN | Tax Anticipation Notes | TAW | Tax Anticipation Warrants |
TRAN | Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes | XLCA | XL Capital Assurance |
The Fund | 17 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited) | |||||
Fitch | or | Moody’s | or | Standard & Poor’s | Value (%)† |
AAA | Aaa | AAA | 15.0 | ||
AA | Aa | AA | 47.3 | ||
A | A | A | 33.1 | ||
BBB | Baa | BBB | 3.7 | ||
Not Ratedd | Not Ratedd | Not Ratedd | .9 | ||
100.0 |
† | Based on total investments. |
d | Securities which, while not rated by Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, have been determined by the Manager to |
be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the fund may invest. | |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Cost | Value | ||
Assets ($): | |||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments | 105,278,851 | 107,289,602 | |
Cash | 42,423 | ||
Interest receivable | 1,376,877 | ||
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | 1,679 | ||
Prepaid expenses | 29,002 | ||
108,739,583 | |||
Liabilities ($): | |||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 44,699 | ||
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | 85,067 | ||
Accrued expenses | 54,162 | ||
183,928 | |||
Net Assets ($) | 108,555,655 | ||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | |||
Paid-in capital | 105,933,059 | ||
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | 647 | ||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | 611,198 | ||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | |||
(depreciation) on investments | 2,010,751 | ||
Net Assets ($) | 108,555,655 | ||
Net Asset Value Per Share | |||
Class A | Class C | Class I | |
Net Assets ($) | 3,239,089 | 587,487 | 104,729,079 |
Shares Outstanding | 146,384 | 26,547 | 4,731,391 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 22.13 | 22.13 | 22.13 |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 19 |
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Interest Income | 1,983,408 | |
Expenses: | ||
Investment advisory fee—Note 3(a) | 218,149 | |
Accounting and administrative fees—Note 3(a) | 28,500 | |
Registration fees | 22,360 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 22,160 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 18,824 | |
Auditing fees | 16,660 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 5,530 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 2,700 | |
Legal fees | 2,698 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 2,073 | |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 142 | |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 47 | |
Miscellaneous | 17,303 | |
Total Expenses | 357,146 | |
Less—reduction in investment advisory fee due to undertaking—Note 3(a) | (103,947) | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(c) | (5) | |
Net Expenses | 253,194 | |
Investment Income—Net | 1,730,214 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 695,946 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | (4,532,104) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | (3,836,158) | |
Net (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (2,105,944) | |
See notes to financial statements. |
20
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 1,730,214 | 3,574,491 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 695,946 | 274,451 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | (4,532,104) | 2,344,153 | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | (2,105,944) | 6,193,095 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net: | ||||
Class A Shares | (36,601) | (17,524) | ||
Class C Shares | (5,704) | (2,018) | ||
Class I Shares | (1,687,262) | (3,552,313) | ||
Net realized gain on investments: | ||||
Class A Shares | (3,630) | — | ||
Class C Shares | (747) | — | ||
Class I Shares | (134,715) | — | ||
Total Dividends | (1,868,659) | (3,571,855) | ||
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Class A Shares | 2,269,887 | 2,159,513 | ||
Class C Shares | 155,781 | 460,579 | ||
Class I Shares | 15,134,264 | 36,947,885 | ||
Dividends reinvested: | ||||
Class A Shares | 36,941 | 16,272 | ||
Class C Shares | 5,555 | 1,650 | ||
Class I Shares | 1,619,112 | 3,107,384 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Class A Shares | (644,350) | (593,981) | ||
Class C Shares | (34,675) | (2,639) | ||
Class I Shares | (17,627,169) | (40,074,005) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | ||||
Beneficial Interest Transactions | 915,346 | 2,022,658 | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (3,059,257) | 4,643,898 | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 111,614,912 | 106,971,014 | ||
End of Period | 108,555,655 | 111,614,912 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | 647 | — |
The Fund | 21 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Class A | ||||
Shares sold | 101,110 | 95,287 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 1,660 | 720 | ||
Shares redeemed | (28,965) | (25,891) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 73,805 | 70,116 | ||
Class C | ||||
Shares sold | 6,960 | 20,255 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 249 | 72 | ||
Shares redeemed | (1,572) | (116) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 5,637 | 20,211 | ||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 679,283 | 1,658,013 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 72,592 | 138,560 | ||
Shares redeemed | (789,897) | (1,787,809) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (38,022) | 8,764 | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
22
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following tables describe the performance for each share class for the fiscal periods indicated.All information (except portfolio turnover rate) reflects financial results for a single fund share.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||
Class A Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | |||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 22.95 | 22.45 | 21.07 | |||
Investment Operations: | ||||||
Investment income—netb | .32 | .61 | .32 | |||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (.79) | .54 | 1.42 | |||
Total from Investment Operations | (.47) | 1.15 | 1.74 | |||
Distributions: | ||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.32) | (.65) | (.36) | |||
Dividends from net realized gain on investments | (.03) | — | — | |||
Total Distributions | (.35) | (.65) | (.36) | |||
Net asset value, end of period | 22.13 | 22.95 | 22.45 | |||
Total Return (%)c | (2.08)d | 5.24 | 8.30d | |||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||
to average net assets | 1.00e | .96 | .96e | |||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||
to average net assets | .80e | .80 | .80e | |||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||
to average net assets | 2.82e | 2.80 | 3.31e | |||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13.56d | 32.07 | 22.49 | |||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 3,239 | 1,665 | 55 |
a | From March 31, 2009 (commencement of initial offering) to September 30, 2009. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 23 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
Six Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||
Class C Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | |||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 22.95 | 22.45 | 21.07 | |||
Investment Operations: | ||||||
Investment income—netb | .23 | .40 | .27 | |||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (.79) | .59 | 1.39 | |||
Total from Investment Operations | (.56) | .99 | 1.66 | |||
Distributions: | ||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.23) | (.49) | (.28) | |||
Dividends from net realized gain on investments | (.03) | — | — | |||
Total Distributions | (.26) | (.49) | (.28) | |||
Net asset value, end of period | 22.13 | 22.95 | 22.45 | |||
Total Return (%)c | (2.45)d | 4.46 | 7.91d | |||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||
to average net assets | 1.73e | 1.74 | 1.72e | |||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||
to average net assets | 1.55e | 1.55 | 1.55e | |||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||
to average net assets | 2.06e | 1.94 | 2.59e | |||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13.56d | 32.07 | 22.49 | |||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 587 | 480 | 16 |
a | From March 31, 2009 (commencement of initial offering) to September 30, 2009. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
24
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
Class I Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009a | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, | ||||||||||||
beginning of period | 22.95 | 22.45 | 20.85 | 21.60 | 21.69 | 21.71 | ||||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||
Investment income—netb | .36 | .73 | .79 | .79 | .78 | .78 | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (.79) | .50 | 1.60 | (.75) | (.09) | (.02) | ||||||
Total from Investment Operations | (.43) | 1.23 | 2.39 | .04 | .69 | .76 | ||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||
Dividends from | ||||||||||||
investment income—net | (.36) | (.73) | (.79) | (.79) | (.78) | (.78) | ||||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||||
gain on investments | (.03) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||
Total Distributions | (.39) | (.73) | (.79) | (.79) | (.78) | (.78) | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period | 22.13 | 22.95 | 22.45 | 20.85 | 21.60 | 21.69 | ||||||
Total Return (%) | (1.90)c | 5.61 | 11.73 | .12 | 3.26 | 3.58 | ||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .64d | .64 | .67 | .60 | .59 | .63 | ||||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .45d | .45 | .45 | .45 | .45 | .45 | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | 3.19d | 3.26 | 3.74 | 3.63 | 3.63 | 3.61 | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13.56c | 32.07 | 22.49 | 34 | 10 | 29 | ||||||
Net Assets, end of period | ||||||||||||
($ x 1,000) | 104,729 | 109,470 | 106,900 | 141,949 | 201,480 | 127,927 |
a | The fund commenced offering three classes of shares on March 31, 2009.The existing shares were redesignated as |
Class I shares. | |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Not Annualized. |
d | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 25 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus/Standish Intermediate Tax Exempt Bond Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Investment Funds (the “Trust”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering eleven series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is to seek a high level of interest income exempt from federal income tax, while seeking preservation of shareholders’ capital. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares. The fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class C and Class I. Class A shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase and Class I shares are sold primarily to bank trust departments and other financial service providers (including The Bank of NewYork Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus), acting on behalf of customers having a qualified trust or an investment account or relationship at such institution, and bear no distribution or shareholder services fees. Class I shares are offered without a front-end sales charge or CDSC. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
26
The Trust accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued each business day by an independent pricing service (the “Service”) approved by the Board ofTrustees. Investments for which quoted bid prices are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the market in the judgment of the Service are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices (as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices (as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such securities). Other investments (which constitute a majority of the portfolio securities) are valued as determined by the Service, based on methods which include consideration of: yields or prices of securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierar-
The Fund | 27 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
chy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of March 31, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
Level 1— | Level 2—Other | Level 3— | ||
Unadjusted | Significant | Significant | ||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | ||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |
Assets ($) | ||||
Investment in Securities: | ||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 107,289,602 | — | 107,289,602 |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to
28
prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at March 31, 2011.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Securities purchased or sold on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis may be settled a month or more after the trade date.
(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, which can distribute tax-exempt dividends, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of income and net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
The Fund | 29 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
As of and during the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 was as follows: tax exempt income $3,571,855. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon, (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing.
The average amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facilities during the period ended March 31, 2011, was approximately $6,600 with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.43%.
NOTE 3—Investment Advisory Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Manager, the investment advisory fee is computed at the annual rate of .40% of the value of the funds average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
30
The Manager has agreed, until February 1, 2012, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class A, Class C and Class I shares (excluding Rule 12b-1 fees, shareholder services fees, taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed .55%, .55% and .45%, respectively, of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets of Class A, Class C and Class I shares.The reduction in investment advisory fee, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $103,947 during the year ended March 31, 2011.
During the period, the Trust had an agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon pursuant to which The Bank of NewYork Mellon provided administration and fund accounting services for the fund. For these services, the fund pays The Bank of New York Mellon a fixed fee plus asset and transaction based fees, as well as out-of-pocket expenses. Pursuant to this agreement, the fund was charged $28,500 during the period ended March 31, 2011 for administration and fund accounting services.
At a Board Meeting of the Trust held on February 15-16, 2011, the Board of Trustees of the Trust terminated the agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon and, on behalf of the Trust, entered into a Fund Accounting and Administration Agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with Dreyfus, effective May 1, 2011, whereby Dreyfus will perform administrative, accounting and recordkeeping services for the fund. The fund has agreed to compensate Dreyfus for providing accounting services, administration, compliance monitoring, regulatory and shareholder reporting, as well as related facilities, equipment and clerical help.The fee is based on the fund’s average daily net assets and computed at the following annual rates: .06% of the first $500 million, .04% of the next $500 million and .02% in excess of $1 billion.
In addition, after applying any expense limitations or fee waivers that reduce the fees paid to Dreyfus for this service, Dreyfus has contrac-
The Fund | 31 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
tually agreed in writing to waive any remaining fees for this service to the extent that they exceed both Dreyfus’ costs in providing these services and a reasonable allocation of the costs incurred by Dreyfus and its affiliates related to the support and oversight of these services.
The fund also will reimburse Dreyfus for the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing this service for the fund.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the Distributor retained $716 from commissions earned on sales of the fund’s Class A shares.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing its shares at an annual rate of .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. During the period ended March 31, 2011, Class C shares were charged $2,073 pursuant to the Plan.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A and Class C shares pay the Distributor at the annual rate of .25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services. The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services. The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended March 31, 2011, Class A and Class C shares were charged $3,247 and $691, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $2,338 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
32
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under cash management agreements for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $182 pursuant to the cash management agreements, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $5.
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $22,160 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $3,146 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: investment advisory fees $37,026, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $381, shareholder services plan fees $800, custodian fees $17,084, chief compliance officer fees $1,957 and transfer agency per account fees $227, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $12,776.
(d) Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (as defined in the Act) receives $60,000 per annum, plus $7,000 per joint Board meeting of the Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc., The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Tax-Free Municipal Funds and Dreyfus Funds, Inc. (collectively, the “Board Group Open-
The Fund | 33 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
end Funds”) attended, $2,500 for separate in-person committee meetings attended which are not held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board meeting and $2,000 for Board meetings and separate committee meetings attended that are conducted by telephone. The Board Group Open-end Funds also reimburse each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of theTrust (as defined in the Act) for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. With respect to Board meetings, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional 25% of such compensation (with the exception of reimbursable amounts).The Chair of each of the Board’s committees, unless the Chair also serves as Chair of the Board, receives $1,350 per applicable committee meeting. In the event that there is an in-person joint committee meeting or a joint telephone meeting of the Board Group Open-end Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund, the $2,500 or $2,000 fee, as applicable, is allocated between the Board Group Open-end Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund.These fees and expenses are charged and allocated to each series based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended March 31, 2011, amounted to $17,268,792 and $14,518,821, respectively.
At March 31, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $2,010,751, consisting of $2,857,425 gross unrealized appreciation and $846,674 gross unrealized depreciation.
At March 31, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
34
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) |
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on February 15 and 16, 2011, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory services (the “Agreement”).The Board also considered the approval of a new Fund Accounting and Administrative Services Agreement (the “Administration Agreement” and together with the Agreement, the “Agreements”) pursuant to which Dreyfus would provide the fund with administrative services.1 The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus. In considering the renewal of the Agreement and the approval of the Administration Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below.The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund.The Board members considered information previously provided to them in presentations from representatives of Dreyfus regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and representatives of Dreyfus confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including the distribution channel(s) for the fund.
The Board members also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also would provide oversight of day-to-day
The Fund | 35 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements. The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructures.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio.The Board members reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended December 31, 2010, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Lipper as of September 30, 2010. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds.The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was above the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians for the various periods, except for the two- and ten-year periods when the fund’s performance was below the Performance Group median.
For each of the ten one-year periods ended December 31st from 2001 through 2010, the Board also noted that the fund’s yield performance was below the Performance Group and above the Performance Universe medians, except for the one-year period ended December 31, 2004 when the fund’s performance was below the Performance Universe median. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s Lipper category average.
36
The Board members also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. They noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and the fund’s total expense ratio was below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
A representative of Dreyfus noted that Dreyfus has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund, until February 1, 2012, so that annual direct fund operating expenses of Class A, Class C and Class I shares (excluding Rule 12b-1 fees, shareholder services fees, taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed .55%, .55% and .45% of the fund’s average daily net assets, respectively.A representative also noted that, in connection with the Administration Agreement and its related fees, Dreyfus contractually agreed to waive any fees to the extent that such fees exceed Dreyfus’ costs in providing the services contemplated under the Administration Agreement.
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the management or investment advisory fees (1) paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund and (2) paid by Dreyfus or the Dreyfus-affiliated primary employer of the fund’s primary portfolio manager for advising any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients.They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
The Fund | 37 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable, given the services rendered, or to be rendered, and service levels provided, or to be provided, by Dreyfus.The Board also noted the expense limitation arrangement and its effect on Dreyfus’ profitability. The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex. The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
The Board’s counsel stated that the Board members should consider the profitability analysis (1) as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreements bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent, and quality of such services, and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Dreyfus representatives noted that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on a fund having achieved a substantial size with increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been stable or decreasing, the possibility that Dreyfus may have realized any economies of scale would be less. They also noted that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus funds complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.
38
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreement and approval of the Administration Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
The Board concluded that the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
The Board generally was satisfied with the fund’s overall perfor- mance, in light of the considerations described above.
The Board concluded that the fees payable to Dreyfus were reason- able in light of the considerations described above.
The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreements and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year. In addition, it should be noted that the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of similar agreements during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board members and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board members’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years. The Board members determined that renewal of the Agreement and approval of the Administration Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
1 | Until May 1, 2011, administrative services were provided pursuant to a Custody,Administration and Accounting Services Agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon. |
The Fund | 39 |
NOTES
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents | |
THE FUND | |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
12 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
13 | Statement of Operations |
14 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
16 | Financial Highlights |
19 | Notes to Financial Statements |
33 | Information About the Renewal of the Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | |
Back Cover |
Dreyfus/Newton
International Equity Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
This semiannual report for Dreyfus/Newton International Equity Fund covers the six-month period from October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011.
Equities throughout the world fared well over the past six months. International stock markets have rallied broadly since the fall of 2010, when new rounds of monetary stimulus from U.S. and foreign central banks gave investors confidence that the global economy was unlikely to slip back into recession. As a result, developed markets rebounded strongly from relatively depressed levels, while emerging markets added more moderately to their previous gains.Although political uprisings in the Middle East and the disasters in Japan injected some uncertainty into the investment climate, these events do not appear to have derailed the global market rally. Market sectors that tend to be sensitive to macroeconomic changes performed particularly well as commodity prices climbed and investors looked forward to better business conditions.
We currently expect most developed and emerging markets to adopt less stimulative fiscal and monetary policies over the remainder of 2011 as the global economy reaches the middle stages of its cycle. Moreover, in the wake of recent gains we believe that selectivity will become a more important determinant of investment success in international markets.We favor the core of Europe over more peripheral members of the European Union, and while we expect the emerging markets to grow faster than developed markets, the growth rate in China seems likely to moderate.As always, your financial advisor can help you align your investment portfolio with the opportunities and challenges that 2011 has in store.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
April 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of October 1, 2010, through March 31, 2011, as provided by Paul Markham, Lead Portfolio Manager of Newton Capital Management Limited, Sub-Investment Adviser
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended March 31, 2011, Dreyfus/Newton International Equity Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of 9.36%, Class C shares returned 8.90% and Class I shares returned 9.44%.1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe,Australasia, Far East Index (“MSCI EAFE Index”), produced a total return of 10.20% for the same period.2 International stocks generally rallied over the reporting period as markets gave credit for a perceived economic recovery.The fund’s returns were lower than its benchmark, primarily due to weak stock selection in the consumer staples and telecommunications services sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks or securities convertible into common stocks of foreign companies and depositary receipts evidencing ownership in such securities. The process of identifying investment ideas begins by identifying a core list of investment themes.These themes are based primarily on observable economic, industrial or social trends (typically global) that Newton believes will positively affect certain sectors or industries. During the reporting period, such themes included “all change” which asserted that the bursting of the credit bubble heralds a number of structural changes in economies and financial markets (and provided the rationale for the fund’s underweighted exposure to the financial sector). Elsewhere, Newton believes the “networked world” theme identifies the opportunities inherent in the growth of information technology networks around the world.
Fragile Economic Confidence Drove Markets Higher
The reporting period began in the wake of heightened volatility in international markets, as a sovereign debt crisis in Europe led to austerity budgets that threatened to dampen an already sluggish regional
The Fund | 3 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
rebound, inflationary pressures in China triggered concerns about a major engine of global growth, and Japan struggled with longstanding deflationary forces. However, it became apparent in the fall of 2010 that the market was willing to overlook some of these concerns. By October, most European banks had passed a series of undemanding “stress tests,” corporate earnings climbed (albeit from a low base), mergers-and-acquisitions activity began to tick up, commodity prices rose and major central banks implemented new programs to ease monetary policy. Greater clarity regarding fiscal and tax policies in the United States after the national midterm elections in November also boosted global investor sentiment, although there was much discussion about any potential exit strategy for the Federal Reserve from its low interest rate policy and bond buying program.
The rally in global equity markets persisted into February, when political uprisings in the Middle East sparked a sharp increase in oil and gas prices, which investors worried might threaten the global economic recovery. In March, a devastating earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster in Japan gave investors cause for concern regarding the world’s second largest economy, triggering a broad sell-off in international equity markets. Despite this, investor sentiment proved resilient in light of reasonable economic news in other regions, and the benchmark had regained lost ground by the reporting period’s end.
Stock Selections Produced Mixed Results
Although the fund rose appreciably in absolute terms over the reporting period, its relative performance was undermined by disappointments in the consumer staples sector, where Japanese beer producer Asahi Breweries was subject to rating-agency downgrades in the wake of the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, which is located near one of Asahi’s brewing facilities.The fund’s results in Brazil were dampened by consumer brands conglomerate Hypermarcas when investors responded negatively to the announcement of a large acquisition, which was seen as an integration risk. In the telecommunications services sector, Turkish mobile telephony company Turkcell Iletism Hizmetleri and U.K.-based Cable & Wireless Communications were hurt by intensifying competition. In addition, Banco Santander Brazil weighed on relative performance as its capital base was seen as being used to shore up the bank’s troubled parent company in Spain, and was sold during the reporting period.
4
Our security selection strategies proved more effective in the energy sector. U.K.-based exploration-and-production company Bowleven benefited from rising commodity prices, which increased the value of the company’s assets off the African coast. In Japan, natural gas producer INPEX rebounded from previous weakness as the company may benefit from Japan’s need to replace the power generation capacity lost to the nuclear disaster.To a lesser extent, an underweight to the utilities sector also contributed positively to the fund’s relative performance.
Positioned for Sluggish Global Growth
Broadly, we expect a global economic recovery to continue slowly, but the rate of growth in developed markets is likely to suffer due to the ongoing process of deleveraging among consumers and businesses. In addition, the end of quantitative easing in the United States and potentially higher interest rates could produce heightened market volatility, and highlight the fragility of the recovery.Therefore, we have positioned the fund to be overweight to the emerging markets, and have found a number of value-oriented opportunities among dividend-paying stocks, primarily in the health care and telecommunications services sectors, that have lagged market averages over the past few years.
April 15, 2011
Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment | |
style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the | |
fund’s prospectus. | |
Investing internationally involves special risks, including changes in currency exchange rates, | |
political, economic and social instability, a lack of comprehensive company information, differing | |
auditing and legal standards and less market liquidity. | |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares, or the applicable | |
contingent deferred sales charge imposed on redemptions in the case of Class C shares. Had these | |
charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future | |
results. Share price, yield and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares | |
may be worth more or less than their original cost. Investments in foreign securities involve special | |
risks. Please read the prospectus for further discussion of these risks. | |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of net dividends and, where applicable, |
capital gain distributions.The Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe,Australasia, Far East | |
(MSCI EAFE) Index is an unmanaged index composed of a sample of companies representative of | |
the market structure of European and Pacific Basin countries.The Index does not take into account | |
fees and expenses to which the fund is subject. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. |
The Fund | 5 |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus/Newton International Equity Fund from October 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||
assuming actual returns for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 6.79 | $ | 10.78 | $ | 5.43 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,093.60 | $ | 1,089.00 | $ | 1,094.40 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | ||||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 6.54 | $ | 10.40 | $ | 5.24 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,018.45 | $ | 1,014.61 | $ | 1,019.75 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.30% for Class A, 2.07% for Class C and 1.04% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Common Stocks—95.7% | Shares | Value ($) |
Australia—6.6% | ||
AMP | 1,156,906 | 6,497,791 |
MacArthur Coal | 485,486 | 5,825,089 |
Newcrest Mining | 274,498 | 11,305,982 |
Santos | 529,655 | 8,519,053 |
White Energy | 1,617,139 a | 5,185,336 |
WorleyParsons | 174,625 | 5,595,716 |
42,928,967 | ||
Belgium—1.1% | ||
Anheuser-Busch InBev | 128,671 | 7,329,626 |
Brazil—3.3% | ||
Arezzo Industria e Comercio | 270,714 | 3,772,237 |
Hypermarcas | 510,658a | 6,756,018 |
International Meal Company Holdings | 262,900 | 2,193,182 |
Natura Cosmeticos | 26,976 | 759,705 |
Rossi Residencial | 429,178 | 3,577,688 |
Tele Norte Leste Participacoes, ADR | 227,210 | 3,982,991 |
21,041,821 | ||
Canada—4.3% | ||
Barrick Gold | 126,354 | 6,567,280 |
Nexen | 148,933 | 3,712,956 |
Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan | 140,964 | 8,315,349 |
Yamana Gold | 766,654 | 9,473,455 |
28,069,040 | ||
China—1.6% | ||
Mindray Medical International, ADR | 110,947 b | 2,795,864 |
Sands China | 3,328,000a | 7,427,359 |
10,223,223 | ||
Denmark—.8% | ||
Pandora | 99,747 | 5,090,487 |
France—6.9% | ||
Air Liquide | 49,893 | 6,629,585 |
BNP Paribas | 172,561 | 12,621,345 |
L’Oreal | 46,006 | 5,359,391 |
Nexans | 57,594 | 5,508,658 |
The Fund | 7 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
France (continued) | ||
Thales | 136,866 | 5,459,161 |
Total | 150,837 | 9,182,284 |
44,760,424 | ||
Germany—3.4% | ||
Bayer | 122,074 | 9,452,855 |
Fresenius Medical Care & Co. | 113,574 | 7,627,720 |
Gerry Weber International | 80,337 | 4,674,807 |
21,755,382 | ||
Hong Kong—6.5% | ||
AIA Group | 2,356,800 | 7,256,540 |
Belle International Holdings | 2,992,000 | 5,485,074 |
China Mobile | 381,500 | 3,514,084 |
GOME Electrical Appliances Holdings | 12,538,000 a | 4,416,520 |
Hongkong Land Holdings | 553,000 | 3,871,000 |
Huabao International Holdings | 3,195,000 | 4,912,509 |
Jardine Matheson Holdings | 159,200 | 7,090,768 |
Man Wah Holdings | 3,631,200 | 4,705,568 |
New World Development | 288,000 | 508,722 |
41,760,785 | ||
Japan—23.4% | ||
Asahi Breweries | 359,300 | 5,973,935 |
Canon | 137,000 | 5,962,250 |
DON Quijote | 211,400 | 6,681,541 |
Hitachi Construction Machinery | 321,000 | 8,038,507 |
INPEX | 1,408 | 10,681,029 |
Lawson | 98,000 | 4,724,453 |
Makita | 155,000 | 7,211,469 |
Mitsubishi | 300,000 | 8,327,723 |
Mitsui Fudosan | 284,000 | 4,687,810 |
Nintendo | 12,600 | 3,403,727 |
Nomura Holdings | 1,484,500 | 7,763,375 |
Otsuka Holdings | 142,500 | 3,520,528 |
Penta-Ocean Construction | 892,000 | 2,219,812 |
Santen Pharmaceutical | 141,900 | 5,655,187 |
Softbank | 264,700 | 10,565,088 |
Sony | 248,600 | 7,961,895 |
8
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Japan (continued) | ||
Sumco | 412,829 | 8,323,085 |
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group | 286,200 | 8,897,730 |
Toshiba | 1,436,000 | 7,026,352 |
Towa Pharmaceutical | 135,100 | 6,829,713 |
Toyota Motor | 431,400 | 17,374,249 |
151,829,458 | ||
Norway—2.3% | ||
DnB NOR | 526,766 | 8,082,111 |
Statoil | 246,334 | 6,828,444 |
14,910,555 | ||
Philippines—.6% | ||
Energy Development | 27,448,500 | 3,801,048 |
Poland—.9% | ||
Telekomunikacja Polska | 939,927 | 5,825,720 |
Singapore—1.9% | ||
DBS Group Holdings | 551,000 | 6,399,556 |
Straits Asia Resources | 2,838,000 | 5,651,234 |
12,050,790 | ||
South Africa—.7% | ||
MTN Group | 216,918 | 4,379,082 |
Spain—.8% | ||
Amadeus IT Holding, Cl. A | 260,035 | 4,975,018 |
Switzerland—10.2% | ||
Actelion | 116,455a | 6,700,759 |
Bank Sarasin & Cie, Cl. B | 90,994 | 3,962,722 |
Lonza Group | 43,641 | 3,660,903 |
Nestle | 195,727 | 11,219,408 |
Novartis | 180,390 | 9,784,464 |
Roche Holding | 101,612 | 14,514,420 |
Syngenta | 28,444 | 9,243,913 |
Zurich Financial Services | 24,988 | 6,994,464 |
66,081,053 | ||
Thailand—4.7% | ||
Advanced Info Service | 1,842,100 | 5,405,918 |
Bangkok Bank | 932,500 | 5,120,566 |
Bangkok Dusit Medical Services Public Company | 72,300 | 123,650 |
The Fund | 9 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | |
Thailand (continued) | |||
Bangkok Dusit Medical Services Public Company | 2,897,200 | 4,938,933 | |
Bank of Ayudhya | 2,065,200 | 1,560,804 | |
Bank of Ayudhya, NVDR | 11,172,100 | 8,874,658 | |
PTT | 375,500 | 4,286,834 | |
30,311,363 | |||
Turkey—.6% | |||
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmet, ADR | 258,700 | 3,888,261 | |
United Kingdom—15.1% | |||
Anglo American | 250,483 | 12,886,598 | |
Associated British Foods | 339,127 | 5,396,785 | |
Barclays | 1,770,147 | 7,881,550 | |
BHP Billiton | 459,994 | 18,152,997 | |
Bowleven | 795,855a | 4,880,255 | |
British American Tobacco | 275,596 | 11,061,685 | |
Cable & Wireless Communications | 4,531,778 | 3,312,176 | |
Cable & Wireless Worldwide | 2,690,647 | 2,263,931 | |
Carnival | 45,431 | 1,787,038 | |
GlaxoSmithKline | 463,659 | 8,847,574 | |
ICAP | 1,033,291 | 8,752,208 | |
Imagination Technologies Group | 794,095a | 5,467,556 | |
Standard Chartered | 260,103 | 6,747,089 | |
97,437,442 | |||
Total Common Stocks | |||
(cost $541,296,813) | 618,449,545 | ||
Preferred Stocks—1.3% | |||
Brazil | |||
Petroleo Brasileiro | |||
(cost $7,791,977) | 476,157 | 8,314,848 |
10
Other Investment—3.0% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Plus Money Market Fund | ||||
(cost $19,302,401) | 19,302,401c | 19,302,401 | ||
Investment of Cash Collateral | ||||
for Securities Loaned—.4% | ||||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Cash Advantage Fund | ||||
(cost $2,618,591) | 2,618,591c | 2,618,591 | ||
Total Investments (cost $571,009,782) | 100.4% | 648,685,385 | ||
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (.4%) | (2,438,948) | ||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 646,246,437 |
ADR—American Depository Receipts |
NVDR—Non-Voting Depository Receipts |
a Non-income producing security. |
b Security, or portion thereof, on loan.At March 31, 2011, the value of the fund’s security on loan was $2,516,270 |
and the value of the collateral held by the fund was $2,618,591. |
c Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | |||
Value (%) | Value (%) | ||
Financial | 19.1 | Telecommunication Services | 6.7 |
Materials | 15.2 | Industrial | 5.7 |
Health Care | 13.1 | Information Technology | 5.4 |
Consumer Discretionary | 10.8 | Money Market Investments | 3.4 |
Energy | 10.5 | Utilities | .6 |
Consumer Staples | 9.9 | 100.4 | |
† Based on net assets. | |||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 11 |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Cost | Value | ||
Assets ($): | |||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments (including | |||
securities on loan, valued at $2,516,270)—Note 1(c): | |||
Unaffiliated issuers | 549,088,790 | 626,764,393 | |
Affiliated issuers | 21,920,992 | 21,920,992 | |
Cash | 1,297,660 | ||
Cash denominated in foreign currencies | 438,914 | 436,260 | |
Receivable for investment securities sold | 11,413,558 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 3,587,151 | ||
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | 660,224 | ||
Unrealized appreciation on forward foreign | |||
currency exchange contracts—Note 4 | 60,588 | ||
Prepaid expenses | 33,335 | ||
666,174,161 | |||
Liabilities ($): | |||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 579,695 | ||
Payable for investment securities purchased | 15,813,187 | ||
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(c) | 2,618,591 | ||
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | 414,911 | ||
Unrealized depreciation on forward foreign | |||
currency exchange contracts—Note 4 | 324,571 | ||
Accrued expenses | 176,769 | ||
19,927,724 | |||
Net Assets ($) | 646,246,437 | ||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | |||
Paid-in capital | 563,901,305 | ||
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | 237,781 | ||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | 4,667,997 | ||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | |||
on investments and foreign currency transactions | 77,439,354 | ||
Net Assets ($) | 646,246,437 | ||
Net Asset Value Per Share | |||
Class A | Class C | Class I | |
Net Assets ($) | 21,085,360 | 1,293,359 | 623,867,718 |
Shares Outstanding | 1,176,134 | 72,874 | 34,775,804 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 17.93 | 17.75 | 17.94 |
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends (net of $473,922 foreign taxes withheld at source): | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 5,479,331 | |
Affiliated issuers | 18,010 | |
Income from securities lending—Note 1(c) | 14,716 | |
Interest | 577 | |
Total Income | 5,512,634 | |
Expenses: | ||
Investment advisory fee—Note 3(a) | 2,336,877 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 414,218 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 189,125 | |
Registration fees | 36,060 | |
Accounting and administration fees—Notes 3(a) | 36,000 | |
Professional fees | 32,232 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 14,551 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 5,317 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 2,971 | |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 718 | |
Miscellaneous | 16,879 | |
Total Expenses | 3,084,948 | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(c) | (5) | |
Net Expenses | 3,084,943 | |
Investment Income—Net | 2,427,691 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | 13,283,673 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on forward foreign currency exchange contracts | (1,058,098) | |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | 12,225,575 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||
on investments and foreign currency transactions | 34,448,221 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||
on forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 1,004,357 | |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | 35,452,578 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 47,678,153 | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 50,105,844 | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 13 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 2,427,691 | 6,698,573 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 12,225,575 | 10,965,846 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 35,452,578 | 3,229,954 | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | 50,105,844 | 20,894,373 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net: | ||||
Class A Shares | (186,610) | (131,070) | ||
Class C Shares | (3,732) | (8,639) | ||
Class I Shares | (6,484,341) | (2,885,834) | ||
Net realized gain on investments: | ||||
Class A Shares | (294,754) | — | ||
Class C Shares | (21,745) | — | ||
Class I Shares | (8,019,784) | — | ||
Total Dividends | (15,010,966) | (3,025,543) | ||
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Class A Shares | 3,958,941 | 9,676,967 | ||
Class C Shares | 85,912 | 415,438 | ||
Class I Shares | 115,217,329 | 194,598,875 | ||
Dividends reinvested: | ||||
Class A Shares | 477,012 | 130,729 | ||
Class C Shares | 25,467 | 8,590 | ||
Class I Shares | 7,750,756 | 940,851 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Class A Shares | (3,538,968) | (8,184,510) | ||
Class C Shares | (252,254) | (287,112) | ||
Class I Shares | (33,629,054) | (44,153,805) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | ||||
Beneficial Interest Transactions | 90,095,141 | 153,146,023 | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 125,190,019 | 171,014,853 | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 521,056,418 | 350,041,565 | ||
End of Period | 646,246,437 | 521,056,418 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | 237,781 | 4,484,773 |
14
Six Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended | |||
(Unaudited) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Class A | ||||
Shares sold | 222,878 | 593,707 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 27,493 | 7,895 | ||
Shares redeemed | (199,112) | (513,536) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 51,259 | 88,066 | ||
Class C | ||||
Shares sold | 4,892 | 25,679 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 1,479 | 523 | ||
Shares redeemed | (14,571) | (18,780) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (8,200) | 7,422 | ||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 6,485,605 | 11,997,797 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 446,730 | 56,849 | ||
Shares redeemed | (1,902,526) | (2,716,420) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 5,029,809 | 9,338,226 | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 15 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following tables describe the performance for each share class for the fiscal periods indicated.All information (except portfolio turnover rate) reflects financial results for a single fund share.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||||
Class A Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008a | ||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 16.80 | 16.27 | 18.18 | 23.37 | ||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||
Investment income—netb | .05 | .21 | .29 | .14 | ||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 1.51 | .44 | (1.57) | (5.20) | ||||
Total from Investment Operations | 1.56 | .65 | (1.28) | (5.06) | ||||
Distributions: | ||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.17) | (.12) | (.16) | (.13) | ||||
Dividends from net realized gain on investments | (.26) | — | (.47) | — | ||||
Total Distributions | (.43) | (.12) | (.63) | (.13) | ||||
Net asset value, end of period | 17.93 | 16.80 | 16.27 | 18.18 | ||||
Total Return (%)c | 9.36d | 3.99 | (6.33) | (21.78)d | ||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||
to average net assets | 1.30e | 1.32 | 1.52 | 2.35e | ||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||
to average net assets | 1.30e | 1.32 | 1.26 | 1.40e | ||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||
to average net assets | .53e | 1.29 | 2.27 | 1.61e | ||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 33.55d | 64.45 | 115.69 | 105 | ||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 21,085 | 18,901 | 16,864 | 4,412 |
a | From March 31, 2008 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||||
Class C Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008a | ||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 16.59 | 16.17 | 18.14 | 23.37 | ||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||
Investment income (loss)—netb | (.03) | .08 | .26 | .05 | ||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 1.50 | .45 | (1.59) | (5.15) | ||||
Total from Investment Operations | 1.47 | .53 | (1.33) | (5.10) | ||||
Distributions: | ||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.05) | (.11) | (.17) | (.13) | ||||
Dividends from net realized gain on investments | (.26) | — | (.47) | — | ||||
Total Distributions | (.31) | (.11) | (.64) | (.13) | ||||
Net asset value, end of period | 17.75 | 16.59 | 16.17 | 18.14 | ||||
Total Return (%)c | 8.90d | 3.20 | (6.67) | (21.95)d | ||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||
to average net assets | 2.07e | 2.11 | 1.83 | 6.42e | ||||
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 2.07e | 2.11 | 1.42 | 2.15e | ||||
Ratio of net investment income (loss) | ||||||||
to average net assets | (.31)e | .52 | 2.07 | .49e | ||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 33.55d | 64.45 | 115.69 | 105 | ||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 1,293 | 1,345 | 1,191 | 399 |
a | From March 31, 2008 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund | 17 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Year Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
Class I Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008a | 2007 | 2006b | ||||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, | ||||||||||||
beginning of period | 16.84 | 16.27 | 18.21 | 26.94 | 21.51 | 20.00 | ||||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||
Investment income—netc | .07 | .25 | .30 | .31 | .35 | .27 | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | 1.50 | .45 | (1.59) | (6.64) | 5.41 | 1.54 | ||||||
Total from Investment Operations | 1.57 | .70 | (1.29) | (6.33) | 5.76 | 1.81 | ||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||
Dividends from | ||||||||||||
investment income—net | (.21) | (.13) | (.18) | (.35) | (.20) | (.30) | ||||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||||
gain on investments | (.26) | — | (.47) | (2.05) | (.13) | — | ||||||
Total Distributions | (.47) | (.13) | (.65) | (2.40) | (.33) | (.30) | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period | 17.94 | 16.84 | 16.27 | 18.21 | 26.94 | 21.51 | ||||||
Total Return (%) | 9.44d | 4.31 | (6.32) | (25.80) | 26.92 | 9.15d | ||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.04e | 1.07 | 1.16 | 1.59 | 1.36 | 1.53e | ||||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.04e | 1.07 | 1.13 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.15e | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||||
to average net assets | .84e | 1.57 | 2.41 | 1.33 | 1.45 | 1.63e | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 33.55d | 64.45 | 115.69 | 105 | 87 | 84d | ||||||
Net Assets, end of period | ||||||||||||
($ x 1,000) | 623,868 | 500,811 | 331,986 | 61,779 | 49,134 | 33,354 |
a | The fund commenced offering four classes of shares on March 31, 2008. The existing shares were redesignated |
Class I and the fund added Class A, Class C and Class R shares.The fund terminated its offering of Class R | |
shares on December 3, 2008. | |
b | From December 21, 2005 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2006. |
c | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus/Newton International Equity Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Investment Funds (the “Trust”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering eleven series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term growth of capital.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. Newton Capital Management Limited (“Newton”) serves as the fund’s sub-investment adviser.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, is the distributor of the fund’s shares.The fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest in the following classes of shares: Class A, Class C and Class I. Class A shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class I shares are sold primarily to bank trust departments and other financial services providers (including The Bank of NewYork Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus), acting on behalf of customers having a qualified trust or an investment account or relationship at such institution, and bear no distribution or shareholder services fees. Class I shares are offered without a front-end sales charge or CDSC. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to, the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The Trust accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to
The Fund | 19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant ADRs
20
and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Trustees, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. Investments denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at the prevailing rates of exchange. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts (“forward contracts”) are valued at the forward rate.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The Fund | 21 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of March 31, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at March 31, 2011.
22
(b) Foreign currency transactions: The fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in the market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized on securities transactions between trade and settlement date and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities other than investments resulting from changes in exchange rates. Foreign currency gains and losses on investments are included with net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
(c) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Investing in foreign markets may involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in the U.S. These risks include revaluation of currencies, high rates of inflation, repatriation restrictions on income and capital, and adverse political and economic developments. Moreover, securities issued in these markets may be less liquid, subject to government ownership controls and delayed settlements, and their prices may be more volatile than those of comparable securities in the U.S.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the
The Fund | 23 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended March 31, 2011,The Bank of New York Mellon earned $7,924 from lending portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
(d) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended March 31, 2011 were as follows:
(e) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid
24
annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(f) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years.As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryovers may be more likely to expire unused.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 was as follows: ordinary income $3,025,543. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
The Fund | 25 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund did not borrow under the Facilities.
NOTE 3—Investment Advisory Fee, Sub-Investment Advisory Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with Dreyfus, the investment advisory fee is computed at the annual rate of .80% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. Dreyfus had agreed, until February 1, 2011, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of none of the classes (excluding Rule 12b-1 fees, shareholder services fees, taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and extraordinary expenses) exceed 1.15% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets.There was no reduction in the investment advisory fee, pursuant to the undertaking, during the period ended March 31, 2011.
Pursuant to a sub-investment advisory agreement between Dreyfus and Newton, Dreyfus pays Newton a monthly fee at an annual percentage rate of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets.
During the period, the Trust had an agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon pursuant to which The Bank of NewYork Mellon provided administration and fund accounting services for the fund. For these services, the fund pays The Bank of New York Mellon a fixed fee plus asset and transaction based fees, as well as out-of-pocket
26
expenses. Pursuant to this agreement, the fund was charged $36,000 during the period ended March 31, 2011 for administration and fund accounting services.
At a Board Meeting of the Trust held on February 15-16, 2011, the Board of Trustees of the Trust terminated the agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon and, on behalf of the Trust, entered into a Fund Accounting and Administration Agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with Dreyfus, effective May 1, 2011, whereby Dreyfus will perform administrative, accounting and recordkeeping services for the fund. The fund has agreed to compensate Dreyfus for providing accounting services, administration, compliance monitoring, regulatory and shareholder reporting, as well as related facilities, equipment and clerical help.The fee is based on the fund’s average daily net assets and computed at the following annual rates: .10% of the first $500 million, .065% of the next $500 million and .02% in excess of $1 billion.
In addition, after applying any expense limitations or fee waivers that reduce the fees paid to Dreyfus for this service, Dreyfus has contractually agreed in writing to waive any remaining fees for this service to the extent that they exceed both Dreyfus’ costs in providing these services and a reasonable allocation of the costs incurred by Dreyfus and its affiliates related to the support and oversight of these services.
The fund also will reimburse Dreyfus for the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing this service for the fund.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the Distributor retained $1,174 from commissions earned on sales of the fund’s Class A shares.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing its shares at an annual rate of .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. During the period ended March 31, 2011, Class C shares were charged $5,317 pursuant to the Plan.
The Fund | 27 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A and Class C shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of .25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services. The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services. The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended March 31, 2011, Class A and Class C shares were charged $25,352 and $1,772, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $2,995 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under cash management agreements for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $173 pursuant to the cash management agreements, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $5.
28
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $189,125 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended March 31, 2011, the fund was charged $3,146 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: investment advisory fees $494,722, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $872, shareholder services plan fees $4,718, custodian fees $76,805, chief compliance officer fees $1,957 and transfer agency per account fees $621.
(d) Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (as defined in the Act) receives $60,000 per annum, plus $7,000 per joint Board meeting of the Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, Inc., The Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust, The Dreyfus/Laurel Tax-Free Municipal Funds and Dreyfus Funds, Inc. (collectively, the “Board Group Open-End Funds”) attended, $2,500 for separate in-person committee meetings attended which are not held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board meeting and $2,000 for Board meetings and separate committee meetings attended that are conducted by telephone. The Board Group Open-End Funds also reimburse eachTrustee who is not an “interested person” of theTrust (as defined in the Act) for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. With respect to Board meetings, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional 25% of such compensation (with the exception of reimbursable amounts).The Chair of each of the Board’s committees, unless the Chair also serves as Chair of the Board, receives $1,350 per applicable committee meeting. In the event that there is an in-person joint committee meeting or a joint telephone meeting of the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund, the $2,500 or $2,000 fee, as applicable, is
The Fund | 29 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
allocated between the Board Group Open-End Funds and Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund.These fees and expenses are charged and allocated to each series based on net assets.
(e) A 2% redemption fee was charged and retained by the fund on certain shares redeemed within sixty days following the date of issuance, subject to exceptions, including redemptions made through the use of the fund’s exchange privilege. During the period ended March 31, 2011, redemption fees charged and retained by the fund amounted to $1,713.
Effective December 15, 2010, the fund no longer charges a redemption fee on shares that are redeemed or exchanged before the end of the required holding period.The fund reserves the right to reimpose a redemption fee in the future.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and forward contracts, during the period ended March 31, 2011, amounted to $251,461,030 and $188,839,039, respectively.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts: The fund enters into forward contracts in order to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on its foreign portfolio holdings, to settle foreign currency transactions or as a part of its investment strategy. When executing forward contracts, the fund is obligated to buy or sell a foreign currency at a specified rate on a certain date in the future. With respect to sales of forward contracts, the fund incurs a loss if the value of the contract increases between the date the forward contract is opened and the date the forward contract is closed.The fund realizes a gain if the value of the contract decreases between those dates.With respect to purchases of forward contracts, the fund incurs a loss if the value of the contract decreases between the date the forward contract is opened and the date the forward contract is closed.The fund realizes a gain if the value of the contract increases between those dates. Any realized gain or loss which occurred during the period is reflected in the Statement of Operations.The fund is exposed to foreign currency
30
risk as a result of changes in value of underlying financial instruments. The fund is also exposed to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance on these forward contracts, which is typically limited to the unrealized gain on each open contract.The following summarizes open forward contracts at March 31, 2011:
Foreign | Unrealized | ||||
Forward Foreign Currency | Currency | Appreciation | |||
Exchange Contracts | Amounts | Cost ($) | Value ($) (Depreciation) ($) | ||
Purchases: | |||||
Australian Dollar, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 892,434 | 920,273 | 923,089 | 2,816 | |
Brazilian Real, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 159,726 | 98,160 | 97,832 | (328 | ) |
Brazilian Real, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 338,280 | 207,891 | 207,197 | (694 | ) |
Brazilian Real, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 272,123 | 167,234 | 166,676 | (558 | ) |
British Pound, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 1,884,690 | 3,022,665 | 3,023,437 | 772 | |
British Pound, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 29,149 | 46,993 | 46,761 | (232 | ) |
Canadian Dollar, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 657,043 | 677,979 | 677,713 | (266 | ) |
Danish Krone, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 653,081 | 124,455 | 124,132 | (323 | ) |
Euro, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 1,056,045 | 1,500,616 | 1,496,620 | (3,996 | ) |
Hong Kong Dollar, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 5,806,735 | 745,715 | 746,506 | 791 | |
Japanese Yen, | |||||
Expiring | |||||
5/13/2011 | 1,589,128,000 | 19,426,755 | 19,109,587 | (317,168 | ) |
Norwegian Krone, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 2,018,770 | 360,849 | 365,041 | 4,192 | |
Philippine Peso, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 4,012,856 | 92,483 | 92,462 | (21 | ) |
Polish Zloty, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 403,443 | 142,291 | 142,077 | (214 | ) |
South African Rand, | |||||
Expiring 4/6/2011 | 729,783 | 107,441 | 107,876 | 435 | |
Swiss Franc, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 1,413,032 | 1,534,037 | 1,538,413 | 4,376 | |
Thai Baht, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 3,223,440 | 106,595 | 106,577 | (18 | ) |
The Fund | 31 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Foreign | Unrealized | ||||
Forward Foreign Currency | Currency | Appreciation | |||
Exchange Contracts | Amounts | Cost ($) | Value ($) (Depreciation) ($) | ||
Purchases (continued): | |||||
Thai Baht, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 4,055,753 | 134,119 | 134,097 | (22 | ) |
Thai Baht, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 3,730,014 | 123,347 | 123,327 | (20 | ) |
Sales: | Proceeds ($) | ||||
Australian Dollar, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 61,332 | 62,760 | 63,439 | (679 | ) |
Brazilian Real, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 1,568,988 | 972,413 | 961,007 | 11,406 | |
Brazilian Real, | |||||
Expiring 4/5/2011 | 758,611 | 470,281 | 464,650 | 5,631 | |
Hong Kong Dollar, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 438,362 | 56,323 | 56,355 | (32 | ) |
Japanese Yen, | |||||
Expiring 4/4/2011 | 134,819,631 | 1,623,191 | 1,620,818 | 2,373 | |
Japanese Yen, | |||||
Expiring 4/5/2011 | 163,809,314 | 1,976,056 | 1,969,335 | 6,721 | |
Japanese Yen, | |||||
Expiring | |||||
5/13/2011 | 1,589,128,000 | 19,127,845 | 19,109,587 | 18,258 | |
Swiss Franc, | |||||
Expiring 4/1/2011 | 918,760 | 1,003,100 | 1,000,283 | 2,817 | |
Gross Unrealized | |||||
Appreciation | 60,588 | ||||
Gross Unrealized | |||||
Depreciation | (324,571 | ) |
The following summarizes the average market value of derivatives outstanding during the period ended March 31, 2011:
Average Market Value ($) | |
Forward contracts | 55,507,943 |
At March 31, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $77,675,603, consisting of $89,158,130 gross unrealized appreciation and $11,482,527 gross unrealized depreciation.
At March 31, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
32
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) |
At a meeting of the fund’s Board ofTrustees held on February 15 and 16, 2011, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement, pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory services (the “Agreement”), and the Sub-Investment Advisory Agreement (together, the “Advisory Agreements”), pursuant to which Newton Capital Management Limited (the “Sub-Adviser”) provides day-to-day management of the fund’s investments.The Board also considered the approval of a new Fund Accounting and Administrative Services Agreement (the “Administration Agreement” and together with the Advisory Agreements, the “Agreements”) pursuant to which Dreyfus would provide the fund with administrative services.1 The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus and the Sub-Adviser. In considering the renewal of the Advisory Agreements and the approval of the Administration Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below.The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund.The Board members considered information previously provided to them in presentations from representatives of Dreyfus regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and representatives of Dreyfus confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including the distribution channel(s) for the fund.
The Fund | 33 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
The Board members also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also would provide oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructures, as well as Dreyfus’ supervisory activities over the Sub-Adviser.The Board also considered portfolio management’s brokerage policies and practices (including policies and practices regarding soft dollars) and the standards applied in seeking best execution.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio.The Board members reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended December 31, 2010, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Lipper as of September 30, 2010. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds.The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was below the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians for the various periods, except for the one-year period when the fund’s performance was above the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians
34
and the four-year period when the fund’s performance was above the Performance Universe median. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s benchmark index.
The Board members also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. They noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was at the Expense Group median and above the Expense Universe median and the fund’s total expenses were below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians. A representative of Dreyfus noted that, in connection with the Administration Agreement and its related fees, Dreyfus contractually agreed to waive any fees to the extent that such fees exceed Dreyfus’ costs in providing the services contemplated under the Administration Agreement.
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the management or investment advisory fees (1) paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund and (2) paid to Dreyfus or the Sub-Adviser or its affiliates for advising any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients.They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
The Board considered the fee to the Sub-Adviser in relation to the fee paid to Dreyfus by the fund and the respective services provided by the Sub-Adviser and Dreyfus.The Board also noted the Sub-Adviser’s fee is paid by Dreyfus (out of its fee from the fund) and not the fund.
The Fund | 35 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S |
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued) |
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable, given the services rendered, or to be rendered, and service levels provided, or to be provided, by Dreyfus.The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex.The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
The Board’s counsel stated that the Board members should consider the profitability analysis (1) as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreements bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus and the Sub-Adviser, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Since Dreyfus, and not the fund, pays the Sub-Adviser pursuant to the Sub-Investment Advisory Agreement, the Board did not consider the Sub-Adviser’s profitability to be relevant to its deliberations.They also noted that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus funds complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus and the Sub-Adviser from acting as investment adviser and sub-investment adviser, respectively, and noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Advisory Agreements
36
and the approval of the Administration Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus and the Sub-Adviser are adequate and appropriate.
The Board generally was satisfied with the fund’s improved per- formance, in light of the considerations described above.
The Board concluded that the fees payable to Dreyfus and the Sub- Adviser were reasonable in light of the considerations described above.
The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreements and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year. In addition, it should be noted that the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of similar agreements during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board members and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board members’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years. The Board members determined that renewal of the Advisory Agreements and approval of the Administration Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
1 | Until May 1, 2011, administrative services were provided pursuant to a Custody,Administration and Accounting Services Agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon. |
The Fund | 37 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures applicable to Item 10.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
3 |
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable.
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
4 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dreyfus Investment Funds
By: /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak |
Bradley J. Skapyak, President
|
Date: May 24, 2011 |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
|
By: /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak |
Bradley J. Skapyak, President
|
Date: May 24, 2011 |
|
By: /s/ James Windels |
James Windels, Treasurer
|
Date: May 24, 2011 |
|
5 |
EXHIBIT INDEX
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT)
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT)
6 |