table of contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
/X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED October 30, 2004 |
OR |
/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD From _________ to ________. |
Commission File number 1-9299 |
JOY GLOBAL INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware (State of Incorporation) | | 39-1566457 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
100 East Wisconsin Ave, Suite 2780, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Address of principal executive offices) | | 53202 (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (414) 319-8500 |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012
(Title of Class)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $1 Par Value
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [ X ] No [ ]
The aggregate market value of Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates, as of May 1, 2004 the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on a closing price of $26.25 per share, was approximately $1,340.8 million.
The number of shares outstanding of Registrant’s Common Stock, as of December 10, 2004, was 52,029,810.
Explanatory Note
The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A is to amend our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2004 (the "Original Filing"), which we filed on December 22, 2004. This Amendment No. 1 is being filed to address comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the staff's review of the Original Filing. This Amendment No. 1 amends: (i) Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to expand the text appearing under the heading "Results of Operations - 2004 Compared with 2003 - Provision for Income Taxes," the text appearing under the heading "Restructuring and Other Special Charges" and the Revenue Recognition paragraph appearing under the heading "Critical Accounting Policies", (ii) Item 7a, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk to include an additional derivatives table, (iii) Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data to include an explanatory paragraph, (iv) Item 9a, Controls and Procedures to clarify the disclosure contained in Item 9a, (v) Item 15(a)(1), Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity to show the tax benefit from the exercise of stock options and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to amend the "Geographical Segment Information" and (vi) the certifications required by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), so that they are dated as of a current date as required by Rule 12b-15 of the Exchange Act.
This amendment does not change any of the account balances on the consolidated balance sheet, statement of income, statement of shareholders' equity or statement of cash flows in the audited financial statements included in the Original Filing.
We have not updated other information contained in the Original Filing in this Amendment. Therefore, you should read this Amendment together with other reports and documents that we have filed with the SEC subsequent to the date of the Original Filing. Information in those other reports and documents updates and supersedes some of the information contained in this Amendment. You should not deem the filing of this Amendment to be an admission that our Original Filing, when made, included any untrue statement of material fact or omitted to state a material fact necessary to make a statement in the Original Filing not misleading.
table of contents
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. References made to years are for fiscal year periods. Dollar amounts are in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated.
The purpose of this discussion and analysis is to enhance the understanding and evaluation of the results of operations, financial position, cash flows, indebtedness, and other key financial information of Joy Global Inc. and its subsidiaries for Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003, and Fiscal 2002. For a more complete understanding of this discussion, please read the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.
Overview
We are the direct successor to businesses that have been manufacturing mining equipment for over 120 years. We operate in two business segments: Underground Mining Machinery, comprised of our Joy Mining Machinery business (“Joy”), and Surface Mining Equipment, comprised of our P&H Mining Equipment business (“P&H”). Joy is the world’s largest producer of high productivity electric-powered underground mining equipment used primarily for the extraction of coal. P&H is the world’s largest producer of high productivity electric mining shovels and a leading producer of walking draglines and large rotary blasthole drills, used primarily for surface mining copper, coal, iron ore, oil sands and other minerals.
Over 87% of our sales are to the coal and copper mining industries. In addition to selling new equipment, we provide parts, components, repairs, rebuilds, diagnostic analysis, fabrication, training and other aftermarket services for our installed base of machines. In the case of Surface Mining Equipment, we also provide aftermarket services for equipment manufactured by other companies, including over 15 manufacturers with which we have ongoing relationships and which we refer to as “Alliance Partners.” We emphasize our aftermarket products and services as an integral part of lowering our customers’ cost per unit of production and are focused on continuing to grow this part of our business.
Demand for new equipment is cyclical in nature, being driven by commodity prices and other factors. Our new equipment sales over the last five years have ranged from a high of $458.6 million in Fiscal 2004 to a low of $339.5 million in Fiscal 2001. In contrast, our aftermarket business has shown consistent growth over the past five years despite commodity production restrictions and price volatility, and helps moderate the effects of changes in new equipment demand on our financial performance. Our aftermarket sales over the last five years have grown from $741.1 million in Fiscal 2000 to $973.6 million in Fiscal 2004.
Approximately 88% of our sales in Fiscal 2004 were recorded at the time of shipment of the product or delivery of the service. The remaining 12% of sales was recorded using percentage of completion accounting, a practice we follow in recognizing revenue on the sale of long lead-time equipment such as electric mining shovels, walking draglines and roof supports. Under percentage of completion accounting, revenue is recognized on firm orders from customers as the product is manufactured based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to estimated total costs to be incurred. We generally receive progress payments on long lead-time equipment.
The major components of our cost of sales are manufacturing overhead, labor and raw materials such as steel. We have taken significant steps to reduce manufacturing overhead. In recent years, we have been adversely affected by increases in the cost of raw materials, specifically steel. The mix of original equipment and aftermarket sales affects our operating profit. Our aftermarket products and services generally carry higher margins than our original equipment and increases in our aftermarket sales have a favorable impact on our profitability. Although steel prices increased, our gross profit margin in Fiscal 2004 increase to 26.7% from 24.1% in Fiscal 2003.
In Fiscal 2004, approximately 47% of our sales were made to customers from the United States. With the exception of South Africa, our domestic and international sales are largely denominated in U.S. dollars or pounds sterling. From time to time, we hedge specifically identified committed cash flows using foreign currency sale or purchase contracts.
On June 7, 1999, the Predecessor Company and substantially all of its domestic operating subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Our Plan of Reorganization (the “POR”) was confirmed on May 29, 2001. We formally emerged from bankruptcy on the July 12, 2001 (the “Effective Date”).
As part of our emergence, we adopted fresh start accounting pursuant to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant’s Statement of Position 90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code” (“SOP 90-7”). In accordance with fresh start accounting principles, our assets and liabilities were adjusted to their fair value as of the Effective Date and the excess of our enterprise value over the fair value of our tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities was reported as excess reorganization value in our consolidated balance sheet. The net effect of fresh start accounting adjustments was a gain of $45.1 million which was recorded in the income statement for the Predecessor Company during Fiscal 2001. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, our financial statements are not comparable to those of the Predecessor Company.
Results of Operations
2004 Compared with 2003
Sales
The following table sets forth Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003 net sales as derived from our Consolidated Statement of Income:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| $ Change
| % Change
|
---|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underground Mining Machinery | | | $ | 820,121 | | $ | 685,999 | | $ | 134,122 | | | 19 | .6% |
Surface Mining Equipment | | | | 612,046 | | | 529,967 | | | 82,079 | | | 15 | .5% |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Total | | | $ | 1,432,167 | | $ | 1,215,966 | | $ | 216,201 | | | 17 | .8% |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Total net sales for Fiscal 2004 increased by $216.2 million, or 17.8%, over Fiscal 2003 net sales. Net sales in the United States increased by $90.2 million, or 15.5%, and net sales in the rest of the world rose by $126.0, or 19.9%. Reflecting the cyclical upturn in commodities, original equipment revenues increased by 34.9% to $458.6 million in Fiscal 2004, accounting for 32.0% of total revenues for the year. We anticipate this percentage to increase further in Fiscal 2005. Aftermarket sales, which include sales of parts and services, increased 11.1% to $973.6 million for Fiscal 2004.
The increase in Underground Mining Machinery net sales in Fiscal 2004 was the result of an increase in original equipment product shipments and, to a lesser extent, aftermarket sales. New machine sales booked through the United Kingdom increased due to a large roof support order and an increase in armored face conveyor shipments to both the United Kingdom and China. South Africa recovered from depressed levels of prior year new machine sales with increased shipments of continuous miners in Fiscal 2004. New machine sales increased in Australia primarily due to an increase in shipments of roof supports, longwall shearers and armored face conveyors, which were partially offset by a decline in sales of continuous miners. United States new machine sales were down slightly due to decreases in shipments of roof supports and armored face conveyors partially offset by increased shipments of continuous miners and shuttle cars. Aftermarket sales showed significant improvement in the United States while revenues from South Africa benefited from the weakness of the U.S. dollar and the favorable impact of translating South African Rand sales into U.S. dollars. Those increases in aftermarket sales were partially offset by a decrease in complete machine rebuilds in Australia primarily due to unusually high levels of sales in Fiscal 2003. Throughout the markets we serve both our new machine and aftermarket sales have benefited from the prices our customers receive for their coal. Activity levels in the emerging markets, including China, continued the high level of activity we began to see in Fiscal 2003.
The increase in Surface Mining Equipment net sales in Fiscal 2004 was a result of increases in new and used equipment shipments, as well as aftermarket parts and service sales. The increase in new equipment was due to higher sales of electric mining shovels in both Russia and the United States and U.S. sales of loading equipment manufactured by our Alliance Partners. The increase in U.S. new equipment sales was driven by stronger demand in the coal and iron ore markets. The Russian shovel sale, which was the first new electric mining shovel sold in Russia, was attributable to increased activity in the coal market. An increase in sales of used electric mining shovels was attributable to shipments to both Russia and Zambia. In the aftermarket, sales of replacement parts increased primarily in South America and the Southwestern United States. Service sales were strong in Brazil, Chile, South Africa and the United States, partially offset by lower service sales in Canada.
Operating Income
The following table sets forth Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003 operating income as derived from our Consolidated Statement of Income:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| $ Change
| % Change
|
---|
Operating income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underground Mining Machinery | | | $ | 91,376 | | $ | 43,573 | | $ | 47,803 | | | 109 | .7% |
Surface Mining Equipment | | | | 53,189 | | | 27,572 | | | 25,617 | | | 92 | .9% |
Corporate Expense | | | | (36,884 | ) | | (23,463 | ) | | (13,421 | ) | | 57 | .2% |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Total | | | $ | 107,681 | | $ | 47,682 | | $ | 59,999 | | | 125 | .8% |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Operating income for Underground Mining Machinery increased by approximately $47.8 million in Fiscal 2004 as compared to Fiscal 2003. During Fiscal 2004, charges for the depreciation and amortization of the fresh start accounting items decreased by approximately $3.0 million. Excluding the impact of the charges for fresh start, the increase in operating income for Fiscal 2004 was $44.8 million. The high volume of sales favorably impacted operating income in Fiscal 2004. Increased sales activity allowed for higher levels of manufacturing overhead absorption that exceeded the increase in the variable overhead spending in the United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. These favorable impacts were partially offset by increases in our variable selling expenses, engineering expenses associated with new product development, compensation expenses associated with performance-based incentive programs and the cost of steel used to manufacture our products. Expenses in the United States and United Kingdom in Fiscal 2004 were positively affected by the restructuring activity that took place in Fiscal 2003.
Operating income for Surface Mining Equipment increased by approximately $25.6 million in Fiscal 2004 as compared to Fiscal 2003. During Fiscal 2004, charges for the depreciation and amortization of the fresh start accounting items decreased by approximately $3.4 million. Excluding the impact of the charges for fresh start, the increase in operating income for Fiscal 2004 was $22.2 million. The increase in operating income for Surface Mining Equipment was the result of an increase in net sales in Fiscal 2004 and a significant increase in manufacturing absorption associated with the higher volume of production of new machines and parts in this segment’s manufacturing facilities. These favorable impacts on margins were partially offset by compensation expenses associated with performance-based incentive programs, higher prices for steel and components, foreign currency exchange rates, severance payments and higher pension costs.
The increase in the corporate expense was primarily attributable to compensation expense associated with performance-based incentive programs.
Product Development, Selling and Administrative Expense
Product development, selling and administrative expense for Fiscal 2004 was $277.4 million, after fresh start charges of $2.8 million, as compared to $241.5 million, after fresh start charges of $9.0 million, for Fiscal 2003. The increase in product development, selling and administrative expense was due primarily to increases in pension expense, compensation expense associated with performance-based incentive programs and the impact associated with the translation of non-U.S. expenses into U.S. dollars due to exchange rate fluctuations. These increases were partially offset by cost reductions associated with our strategic sourcing initiative. Product development, selling and administrative expense as a percentage of sales for Fiscal 2004 decreased to 19.4% as compared to 19.9% in Fiscal 2003.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Pension expense for Fiscal 2004 was $22.0 million compared to pension expense of $14.2 million in Fiscal 2003. The increase in pension expense is primarily the result of a reduction in the discount rate for the pension plans in the United States from 7.0% to 6.25%. These plans represented approximately 56% of our total pension plan assets as of the end of Fiscal 2004.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for Fiscal 2004 decreased to $24.3 million as compared to $27.0 million for Fiscal 2003. This decrease was principally due to our repayment of two industrial revenue bonds in late Fiscal 2003. There were no direct borrowings under our revolving credit agreement in Fiscal 2004. Cash interest paid in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003 was $22.0 million and $23.1 million, respectively.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our consolidated effective income tax rates for Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003 were approximately 41.5% and 33.6%, respectively. Consolidated income tax expense increased to $39.2 million in Fiscal 2004 as compared to $9.4 million in Fiscal 2003. The increase in income tax expense is primarily attributable to the substantial increase in our pre-tax income and a $13.4 million increase in our deferred tax valuation reserves relating to Australian corporate income taxes. These factors were partially offset by the fact that a higher proportion of our taxable income earned in Fiscal 2004 was earned in jurisdictions where we are able to utilize net operating loss carryforwards.
We increased our deferred tax valuation reserves for Australia because such reserves are required under FAS No.109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” to the extent that we conclude that it is more likely than not that the associated deferred tax assets will not be realized. FAS No.109 states that this determination should be based on a weighing of all available positive and negative evidence. At the end of Fiscal 2003, we had projected that our Australian operations, which were restructured during the course of Fiscal 2003, would be profitable during Fiscal 2004 and begin to utilize the loss carryforwards that existed at the end of Fiscal 2003. As a result, the positive evidence regarding the realizability of the Australian deferred tax assets was considered to outweigh the negative evidence, and no incremental reserve was required under FAS No. 109. However, our Australian operations ultimately recorded a net loss for Fiscal 2004. As a result, at the end of Fiscal 2004, we concluded that the additional allowance of $13.4 million was merited because the negative evidence, namely the cumulative losses of our Australian subsidiary (including the loss in Fiscal 2004), outweighed the positive evidence regarding realizability of the deferred tax asset.
Because this incremental Australian valuation reserve increased our provision for income taxes without a corresponding increase in our pre-tax income, it had the effect of substantially increasing our effective tax rate for Fiscal 2004. Excluding the impact of this incremental reserve, our consolidated income tax expense would have been $25.8 million and our consolidated effective income tax rate would have been 27.3%. This rate differs from the 33.6% reported for Fiscal 2003 primarily attributable to the reversal of a $6.3 million deferred tax liability related to the projected tax to be due on a distribution of previously untaxed foreign earnings that was recorded in an earlier year but was not needed as the jurisdiction receiving the distribution was able to utilize foreign tax credits to fully offset the tax impacts of the distribution. This reversal was recorded as a discreet item in the third quarter of Fiscal 2004 and was disclosed in the Form 10-Q filed for that period. Excluding the reversal of this reserve and the valuation reserves discussed above, the effective rate for Fiscal 2004 would have been 33.9%.
2003 Compared with 2002
Sales
The following table sets forth Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002 net sales as derived from our Consolidated Statement of Income:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
| $ Change
| % Change
|
---|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underground Mining Machinery | | | $ | 685,999 | | $ | 745,714 | | $ | (59,715 | ) | | (8 | .0)% |
Surface Mining Equipment | | | | 529,967 | | | 405,133 | | | 124,834 | | | 30 | .8% |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Total | | | $ | 1,215,966 | | $ | 1,150,847 | | $ | 65,119 | | | 5 | .7% |
|
| |
| |
| | |
The decrease in Underground Mining Machinery net sales in Fiscal 2003 was a result of lower new machine shipments and replacement parts sales partially offset by an increase in component repairs and complete machine rebuilds. The decrease in new machine sales was due to lower sales of continuous miners, shuttle cars and roof supports in the United States, lower sales of shuttle cars in South Africa, and lower sales of roof supports in the United Kingdom. New machine shipments increased in Australia due to roof support shipments and the shipment of several continuous miners specifically designed for the Australian market. Aftermarket shipments for repair parts in the United States, United Kingdom and the emerging markets served out of the United Kingdom were softer in Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. Although aftermarket sales in the emerging markets served out of the United Kingdom in Fiscal 2003 did not match the record levels of Fiscal 2002, aftermarket parts shipments into these markets remained strong, despite a temporary interruption of orders due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in China. Aftermarket product shipments in South Africa were strong, principally due to maintenance and life cycle programs to support current equipment and the favorable impact of translating South African Rand sales into U.S. dollars. Mild summer and winter weather during Fiscal 2003 and the delay of the economic recovery in the United States adversely affected Joy’s new machine and aftermarket businesses.
The increase in Surface Mining Equipment net sales in Fiscal 2003 was a result of an increase in new equipment shipments, aftermarket parts and service sales. The increase in new equipment was due to higher sales of electric mining shovels in both South America and Canada. The increase in South American shovel sales was provided by a stronger demand in the copper market. The increase in Canadian shovel sales was attributed to activity in the oil sands. In the aftermarket, sales of replacement parts increased in North and South America, Southern Africa, China and India. Service sales were strong in Australia, which included erection of a dragline, and in South America.
Operating Income
The following table sets forth Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002 operating income as derived from our Consolidated Statement of Income:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
| $ Change
| % Change
|
---|
Operating income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underground Mining Machinery | | | $ | 43,573 | | $ | 19,516 | | $ | 24,057 | | | 123 | .3% |
Surface Mining Equipment | | | | 27,572 | | | (18,157 | ) | | 45,729 | | | 251 | .9% |
Corporate Expense | | | | (23,463 | ) | | (16,502 | ) | | (6,961 | ) | | 42 | .2% |
| | | | |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | | $ | 47,682 | | $ | (15,143 | ) | $ | 62,825 | | | 414 | .9% |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | | |
Operating income for Underground Mining Machinery increased by approximately $24.1 million in Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. Charges for the depreciation and amortization of the fresh start accounting items decreased by approximately $37.8 million. Excluding the impact of the charges for fresh start, the decrease in operating income for Fiscal 2003 was $13.8 million. This decrease included a $5.1 million charge associated with manufacturing capacity rationalization in the United States and restructuring in the United Kingdom and Australia. Operating income was negatively impacted by unfavorable manufacturing absorption associated with the decrease in production of new machines and an increase in both compensation expense associated with performance-based incentive programs and pension expense in the United States and the United Kingdom. Operating income was positively affected by the elimination of unfavorable manufacturing variances associated with the manufacture of roof supports in Fiscal 2002, the favorable impact of our strategic sourcing initiative, and warranty expense improvements through our quality initiative.
Operating income for Surface Mining Equipment increased by approximately $45.7 million in Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. During Fiscal 2003, charges for the depreciation and amortization of the fresh start accounting items decreased by approximately $21.8 million. Excluding the impact of the charges for fresh start, the increase in operating income for Fiscal 2003 was $23.9 million. The increase in operating income for Surface Mining Equipment was the result of an increase in net sales in Fiscal 2003 and a significant increase in manufacturing absorption associated with the higher volume of production of new machines in this segment’s manufacturing facilities. Lower production volumes in Fiscal 2002 resulted in workforce reduction that increased severance and medical benefit costs at our Milwaukee manufacturing facility that was not repeated during Fiscal 2003. These favorable impacts on margins were partially offset by the sales mix, which included a sale of a dragline in Australia, and by compensation expenses associated with performance-based incentive programs.
The increase in the corporate expense was primarily attributable to compensation expense associated with performance-based incentive programs.
Product Development, Selling and Administrative Expense
Product development, selling and administrative expense for Fiscal 2003 was $241.5 million, after fresh start charges of $9.0 million, as compared to $212.8 million, after fresh start charges of $14.0 million, for Fiscal 2002. The increase in product development, selling and administrative expense was due primarily to increases in pension expense, medical costs, general insurance costs, compensation expense associated with performance-based incentive programs and the impact associated with the translation of non-U.S. expenses into U.S. dollars due to exchange rate fluctuations. These increases were partially offset by cost reductions associated with our strategic sourcing initiative. Product development, selling and administrative expense as a percentage of sales for Fiscal 2003 increased to 19.9% as compared to 18.5% in Fiscal 2002.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Pension expense for Fiscal 2003 was $14.2 million compared to pension expense of $2.7 million in Fiscal 2002. The increase in pension expense is the result of a reduction in the expected rate of return on plan assets assumption and a decrease in market value of plan assets from the beginning of the year. For Fiscal 2003 we reduced the return on asset assumption for the pension plans in the United States and the United Kingdom from 9.5% to 9.0% and 9.5% to 7.5%, respectively. These plans represented in excess of 98% of our total pension plan assets as of the end of Fiscal 2003. These rate of return on assets assumptions are based primarily on the targeted investment asset mix and the expected rates of return on the individual components of the investment mix.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for Fiscal 2003 decreased to $27.0 million as compared to $31.0 for Fiscal 2002. This decrease was principally due to our repayment of a term loan in Fiscal 2002 and reduced borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. There were no direct borrowings under our revolving credit agreement in Fiscal 2003. Cash interest paid in Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002 was $23.1 million and $27.7 million, respectively.
Provision for Income Taxes
The consolidated effective income tax rates for Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002 are approximately 34% and 40%, respectively. Consolidated income tax expense increased to $9.4 million in Fiscal 2003 as compared to a benefit of $17.5 million in Fiscal 2002. The increase in income tax expense is primarily attributed to the income earned in Fiscal 2003 as compared to the loss incurred in Fiscal 2002. The principal driver differentiating the tax rate between the two years is the change in the global mix of earnings in jurisdictions whose effective tax rates are lower than the U.S. statutory rate, partially offset in Fiscal 2003 by the provision of taxes against certain accumulated earnings of our South African subsidiary.
Reorganization Items
Reorganization items include income, expenses and losses that were realized or incurred as a result of the decision to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Net reorganization items for Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002 consisted of the following:
In thousands - (income) expense
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Distribution from Beloit Liquidating Trust | | | $ | (2,856 | ) | $ | -- | | $ | -- | |
Beloit Liquidating Trust settlement | | | | (2,336 | ) | | -- | | | -- | |
Beloit U.K. claim settlement | | | | (1,774 | ) | | (3,333 | ) | | -- | |
Other - net | | | | (1,041 | ) | | (573 | ) | | (382 | ) |
Professional fees directly related to the filing | | | | 1,165 | | | 1,495 | | | 352 | |
Collection of Beloit note | | | | -- | | | -- | | | (7,200 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net reorganization income | | | $ | (6,842 | ) | $ | (2,411 | ) | $ | (7,230 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Restructuring and Other Special Charges
Costs associated with restructuring activities other than those activities covered by SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” or that involve an entity newly acquired in a business combination, are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” Costs associated with such activities are recorded as restructuring costs in the consolidated statements of income when the liability is incurred.
During Fiscal 2003, we began implementing a manufacturing capacity rationalization at our P&H Mining Equipment Milwaukee location that reduced factory space by 350,000 square feet and resulted in a facility that is more efficient. The Fiscal 2003 rationalization plan at P&H was completed in Fiscal 2004 at a cost of $2.0 million.
During Fiscal 2003, Joy Mining Machinery began implementing a manufacturing capacity rationalization plan for North America. Total costs for the Joy North American manufacturing capacity rationalization were $3.7 million. Included in this amount is $1.5 million for one-time termination benefits for 132 employees, $0.8 million for abandoned assets, and $1.4 million for other associated costs. Also during Fiscal 2003, Joy Mining Machinery began implementing a manufacturing capacity rationalization plan for the United Kingdom and Australia. The total costs for the United Kingdom manufacturing capacity rationalization were $1.6 million for one-time termination benefits for 26 employees. The total costs for the Australian manufacturing capacity rationalization were $0.2 million for one-time termination benefits for 27 employees. The Fiscal 2003 rationalization plan at Joy was completed in Fiscal 2004.
We realized approximately $5.5 million in cost savings in Fiscal 2004 as a result of the Fiscal 2003 rationalization plan at P&H. These savings were reflected in our cost of sales. We realized approximately $5.8 million in cost savings in Fiscal 2004 as a result of the Fiscal 2003 rationalization plan at Joy. These savings consisted of $4.7 million reflected in our cost of sales and $1.1 million reflect in our product, development, selling and administrative expenses. These savings are sustainable in future years, but will vary based upon sales volumes. If volumes increase, the savings will be higher; if the volumes decrease, the savings will be reduced.
Below is a summary of the activity related to restructuring costs recorded pursuant to SFAS No. 144 and SFAS No.146.
In thousands
| One-time Termination Benefits
| Abandoned Assets
| Other Associated Costs
| Total Charges
|
---|
Fiscal 2003 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
P&H Mining Equipment | | | $ | -- | | $ | 1,154 | | $ | 612 | | $ | 1,766 | |
Joy Mining Machinery | | | | 3,384 | | | 715 | | | 1,050 | | | 5,149 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | $ | 3,384 | | $ | 1,869 | | $ | 1,662 | | $ | 6,915 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fiscal 2004 | | |
| | | | | | | |
P&H Mining Equipment | | | $ | -- | | $ | -- | | $ | 253 | | $ | 253 | |
Joy Mining Machinery | | | | 200 | | | -- | | | 172 | | | 372 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
| | | $ | 200 | | $ | -- | | $ | 425 | | $ | 625 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cumulative Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
P&H Mining Equipment | | | $ | -- | | $ | 1,154 | | $ | 865 | | $ | 2,019 | |
Joy Mining Machinery | | | | 3,584 | | | 715 | | | 1,222 | | | 5,521 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
| | | $ | 3,584 | | $ | 1,869 | | $ | 2,087 | | $ | 7,540 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We continually evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, excess inventory, warranty, intangible assets, income taxes and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We believe the accounting policies described below are the ones that most frequently require us to make estimates and judgments, and therefore are critical to the understanding of our results of operations:
Revenue Recognition
We generally recognize revenue at the time of shipment and passage of title for sales of products and at the time of performance for sales of services. We recognize revenue on long-term contracts, such as the manufacture of mining shovels, drills, draglines and roof support systems, using either the percentage-of-completion or the inventory sales methods. When using the percentage-of-completion method, sales and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred and total estimated costs at completion. Sales and gross profit are adjusted prospectively for revisions in estimated total contract costs and contract values. Estimated losses are recognized in full when identified.
We have life cycle management contracts with customers to supply parts and service for terms of 1 to 13 years. These contracts are set up based on the projected costs and revenues of servicing the respective machines over the specified contract terms. Accounting for these contracts requires us to make various estimates, including estimates of the relevant machine's long-term maintenance requirements. Under these contracts, customers are generally billed monthly and the respective deferred revenues are recorded when billed. Revenue is recognized in the period in which parts are supplied or services provided. These contracts are reviewed periodically and revenue recognition is adjusted appropriately for future estimated costs. If a loss is expected at any time, the full amount of the loss is recognized immediately.
Revenue recognition involves judgments, assessments of expected returns, the likelihood of nonpayment, and estimates of expected costs and profits on long-term contracts. We analyze various factors, including a review of specific transactions, historical experience, credit-worthiness of customers and current market and economic conditions, in determining when to recognize revenue. Changes in judgments on these factors could impact the timing and amount of revenue recognized with a resulting impact on the timing and amount of associated income.
Inventories
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method of accounting. We evaluate all inventory, including raw material, work-in-process, finished goods and spare parts, for realizability on a regular basis. Inherent in our estimates of net realizable value are estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, possible alternative uses and ultimate realizable value of potentially excess inventory. We fully reserve for inventory identified as obsolete inventory.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include software, drawings, patents, trademarks, unpatented technology and other specifically identifiable intangible assets. We review the carrying value of our intangible assets on an annual basis or more frequently as circumstances warrant. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” and valued on a relief from royalty basis using future revenues discounted over the timeframe of economic benefit. Intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” using undiscounted cash flows. While we believe that our estimates of future revenues and cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding revenues and cash flows could materially affect our evaluations.
Accrued Warranties
We record accruals for potential warranty claims based on prior claim experience. Warranty costs are accrued at the time revenue is recognized. These warranty costs are based upon management’s assessment of past claims and current experience. However, actual claims could be higher or lower than amounts estimated, as the amount and value of warranty claims are subject to variation as a result of many factors that cannot be predicted with certainty.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits and Costs
We have pension benefits and expenses which are developed from actuarial valuations. These valuations are based on assumptions including, among other things, discount rates, expected returns on plan assets, retirement ages, years of service, and future salary increases. Future changes affecting the assumptions will change the related pension benefit or expense.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using statutory tax rates. Deferred income tax provisions are based on changes in the deferred tax assets and liabilities from period to period, adjusted for certain reclassifications under fresh start accounting.
In addition, we analyze our ability to recognize currently the net deferred tax assets created in each jurisdiction in which we operate to determine if valuation allowances are necessary because realizability of the tax assets is deemed to not be more likely than not. Prior to Fiscal 2002, we determined that we did not meet the requirements that would allow us to record the future benefits of any net operating losses, tax credits or net deferred tax assets for financial reporting purposes due to our emergence from bankruptcy in Fiscal 2001. As a result, we recorded valuation reserves as necessary to reduce the book value of our net deferred tax asset to zero. After Fiscal 2001, we have annually assessed on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis the need for either the recording of or release of valuation reserves. During Fiscal 2002, we reviewed this position and, based upon past, current and future operating performance, expectations and available tax strategies, did not provide full valuation allowances for new net deferred tax assets as of November 2, 2002. Additionally, in Fiscal 2002 we released all non-U.S. deferred tax valuation reserves recorded at the end of Fiscal 2001 (except for those of certain Australian business segments as we concluded that the utilization of these assets is not more likely than not) and a portion of the reserves recorded against the net U.S. asset based upon projected future net operating loss utilization. For Fiscal 2003, we performed a similar realization analysis for all deferred tax assets and again did not provide full valuation allowances for new net deferred tax assets created as of November 1, 2003. Additional amounts of valuation reserves related to U.S. and Australian net operating loss carryforwards were released based upon a tax restructuring in Australia and projected future net operating loss utilization. In Fiscal 2004, we have reassessed our gross deferred tax assets as they relate to our Australian operations and our U.S. State tax loss carryforwards. Based upon the results of this analysis, valuation reserves were provided against those amounts not already reserved due to potential issues as to ultimate utilization of these amounts.
As required under the application of fresh start accounting, the release of pre-emergence tax valuation reserves was not recorded in the income statement but instead was treated first as a reduction of excess reorganization value until exhausted, then intangibles until exhausted, and thereafter reported as additional paid in capital. Consequently, a net tax charge will be incurred in future years when these tax assets are utilized. We will continue to monitor the appropriateness of the existing valuation allowances and determine annually the amount of valuation allowances that are required to be maintained.
We estimate the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year during the course of the year on an interim basis. The estimated effective tax rate contemplates the expected jurisdiction where income is earned (e.g. United States compared to non-United States) as well as tax planning strategies. If the actual results are different from these estimates, adjustments to the effective tax rate may be required in the period such determination is made. Additionally, discreet items are treated separately from the effective rate analysis and are recorded separately as an income tax provision or benefit at the time they are recognized. To the extent recognized, these items will impact the effective tax rate in aggregate but will not adjust the amount used for future periods within the same fiscal year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working capital and cash flow are two financial measurements which provide an indication of our ability to meet our financial obligations. We currently use cash generated by operations to fund continuing operations.
The following table summarizes the major elements of our working capital at the end of Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003:
In millions
| October 30, 2004
| November 1, 2003
|
---|
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 231 | .7 | $ | 148 | .5 |
Accounts receivable | | | | 260 | .0 | | 193 | .9 |
Inventories | | | | 443 | .8 | | 382 | .9 |
Other current assets | | | | 56 | .6 | | 51 | .3 |
Short-term debt | | | | (3 | .1) | | (4 | .8) |
Accounts payable | | | | (139 | .2) | | (89 | .1) |
Employee compensation and benefits | | | | (82 | .5) | | (57 | .7) |
Advance payments and progress billings | | | | (87 | .5) | | (36 | .7) |
Income taxes payable | | | | (4 | .9) | | (26 | .1) |
Other current liabilities | | | | (114 | .7) | | (111 | .3) |
|
| |
| |
Working Capital | | | $ | 560 | .2 | $ | 450 | .9 |
|
| |
| |
Our businesses are working capital intensive and require funding for purchases of production and replacement parts inventories. In addition, cash is required for capital expenditures for the repair, replacement and upgrading of existing facilities. We have debt service requirements, including semi-annual interest payments on our senior subordinated notes as well as commitment and letter of credit fees under our revolving credit facility. We believe that cash generated from operations, together with borrowings available under our credit facility, provides us with adequate liquidity to meet our operating and debt service requirements and planned capital expenditures.
Cash provided by operations for Fiscal 2004 was $62.3 million as compared to $105.6 million provided by operations for Fiscal 2003. The primary change in our cash from operations was attributable to the increase in net income offset by the contributions to our pension plans and the usage of working capital. Approximately $30.9 million was provided from working capital in Fiscal 2004 while approximately $87.5 million was provided from working capital in Fiscal 2003. The most significant working capital changes affecting the usage of cash from Fiscal 2003 to Fiscal 2004 related to inventories and accounts receivable. Inventories were increased to provide for the increase in orders while the timing of year-end sales resulted in a significant increase in outstanding accounts receivable. The most significant working capital changes providing an increase of cash from Fiscal 2003 to Fiscal 2004 related to advance payments and trade accounts payable. The timing of cash received from customers and payments to outside vendors contributed to increased advance payments and trade accounts payable balances at the end of Fiscal 2004.
During Fiscal 2004, we contributed $95.4 million to our worldwide pension plans compared to $53.8 million during Fiscal 2003. As a result of the additional contributions in Fiscal 2004, we do not expect that additional contributions for U.S. plans will be required in fiscal 2005. However, we currently believe we will make voluntary contributions for our U.S. plans in the range of $20 million to $40 million in Fiscal 2005. Beyond Fiscal 2005, the investment performance of the plans’ assets and the actual results of the other actuarial assumptions will determine the funding requirements of the pension plans.
Cash used by investment activities for Fiscal 2004 was $11.1 million as compared to $30.5 million used by investment activities for Fiscal 2003. Approximately $21.1 million and $27.5 million were used for capital expenditures in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively. For Fiscal 2005, we anticipate capital expenditures between $30 million and $40 million, primarily for maintenance of existing facilities, completion of SAP implementation, and other projects. In addition, approximately $12.3 million was used in Fiscal 2003 to acquire the 25% interest in our Australian surface mining equipment subsidiary held by Kobelco Construction Machinery Co. Limited.
Cash provided by financing activities for Fiscal 2004 was $27.6 million as compared to $10.0 million used by financing activities for Fiscal 2003. The increase in Fiscal 2004 primarily resulted from the exercise of stock options generating $44.7 million partially offset by the dividends paid of $14.0 million. In Fiscal 2003, approximately $12.5 million was used to retire industrial revenue bonds.
Credit Facilities
On January 23, 2004, we entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) relating to a $200 million revolving credit facility maturing on October 15, 2008. Substantially all of our assets and our domestic subsidiaries’ assets, other than real estate, are pledged as collateral under the Credit Agreement. Outstanding borrowings bear interest equal to either LIBOR plus the applicable margin (3.25% to 2.00%) or the Base Rate (defined as the higher of the Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50%) plus the applicable margin (2.25% to 1.00%) at our option depending on certain of our financial ratios. We pay a commitment fee ranging from 0.50% to 0.75% on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility. In 2002, we issued $200 million in 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due March 15, 2012. In December 2004 we repurchased $14.5 million of these notes.
Both the Credit Agreement and Senior Subordinated Note Indenture contain restrictions and financial covenants relating to, among other things, minimum financial performance and limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, liens, asset sales, and capital expenditures. The covenants in the Senior Subordinated Note Indenture are generally less restrictive than the covenants in the Credit Agreement. Interest coverage, leverage and fixed charge coverage covenants in the Credit Agreement generally become more restrictive over the term of the Agreement. At October 30, 2004, we were in compliance with all financial covenants in the Credit Agreement and the Indenture.
At October 30, 2004, there were no outstanding direct borrowings under the Credit Agreement. Outstanding letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreement, which count toward the $200 million credit limit, totaled $79.8 million. The amount available for borrowings under the Credit Agreement is also limited by a borrowing base calculation. At October 30, 2004, there was $120.2 million available for borrowings under the Credit Agreement.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We lease various assets under operating leases. The aggregate payments under operating leases as of October 30, 2004 are disclosed in the table of Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments below. No significant changes to lease commitments have occurred since October 30, 2004. We have no other off-balance sheet arrangements.
Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of October 30, 2004:
In thousands
| Total
| Less than 1 year
| 1 - 3 years
| 3 - 5 years
| More than 5 years
|
---|
Long-Term Debt | | | $ | 200,267 | | $ | -- | | $ | -- | | $ | 267 | | $ | 200,000 | |
Short-Term Notes Payable | | | | 2,297 | | | 2,297 | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | |
Capital Lease Obligations | | | | 3,415 | | | 813 | | | 1,351 | | | 184 | | | 1,067 | |
Purchase Obligations | | | | 21,526 | | | 6,244 | | | 12,373 | | | 1,682 | | | 1,227 | |
Operating Leases | | | | 31,543 | | | 12,270 | | | 10,727 | | | 2,879 | | | 5,667 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total | | | $ | 259,048 | | $ | 21,624 | | $ | 24,451 | | $ | 5,012 | | $ | 207,961 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Market Conditions and Outlook
Market conditions in most of the commodity markets served by our customers remain robust. Coal markets in the United States continue to strengthen in both pricing and demand. Higher spot coal prices are expected over time to be reflected in higher prices in supply contracts. Demand for coal is being positively affected by continued high natural gas prices, reduced imports of coal into the United States from South America, and increases in exports of metallurgical coal from the United States. Coal producers in the United States are increasing their production levels and capital spending plans. The increase in production levels is primarily occurring in existing mine operations, which we believe is leading to the increasing demand for replacement equipment as operators drive for more production from the same reserves.
The international coal markets continue to be strong with rising prices for both thermal and metallurgical coal. Capacity levels in port facilities have resulted in shipping constraints in both South Africa and Australia. China continues to take steps in the long-term to convert its underground coal industry to high productivity mining methods. Efforts by the Chinese banking regulators to reduce investment in areas such as steel and real estate while encouraging investments in power plants, railroads, and coal should reduce the risk of capital availability and be a positive contributor to this conversion. We continue to believe we will experience solid, long-term, double-digit growth in China, both for our underground mining machinery and our aftermarket parts and service activities.
Markets served by P&H in surface mining are strong across the board. Copper, the largest of these markets, continues to enjoy strong pricing. Copper producers are increasing production at a number of mines and developing plans and ordering equipment for new mines. Although new original equipment orders were limited in the third and fourth quarters, interest remains high, particularly in copper and the oil sands markets. As with Joy on the underground side of our business, order books are filling well into 2005.
Several factors temper our outlook. We believe that the current increases in purchases for mining equipment and services will be affected by our customers’ efforts to constrain their production and capital spending. As we increase our production to meet the increased demand for mining equipment, our challenge is to manage our working capital and the other aspects of our business so that we meet the needs of our customers while maximizing returns to shareholders. We will need to continue to control pension and health care costs. Our ability to grow revenues is constrained by the capacity of our plants, our ability to supplement that capacity with outside sources, and our success in securing critical supplies such as steel and copper. The positive effects we are seeing on our business as a result of higher customer production and capital spending levels could be offset by customer restraints on production and capital spending, capacity limitations at our facilities, and continuing tight steel supplies.
New Accounting Pronouncements
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” The FASB has concluded that companies could adopt the new standard in one of two ways: the modified prospective transition method and the modified retrospective transition method. Using the modified prospective transition method, a company would recognize share-based employee compensation cost from the beginning of the fiscal period in which the recognition provisions are first applied as if the fair-value-based accounting method had been used to account for all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after the effective date and to any awards that were not fully vested as of the effective date. Using the modified retrospective method, a company would recognize employee compensation cost for periods presented prior to the adoption of the proposed standard in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123; that is, an entity would recognize employee compensation cost in the amounts reported in the pro forma disclosures provided in accordance with SFAS No. 123. A company would not be permitted to make any changes to those amounts upon adoption of the proposed standard unless those changes represent a correction of an error (and are disclosed accordingly). For periods after the date of adoption of the proposed standard, the modified prospective transition method described above would be applied. We will adopt SFAS No. 123(R) and will continue to evaluate the impact the adoption of this standard will have on our results of operations.
On May 19, 2004, FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.” This statement applies to the sponsor of a single-employer defined benefit postretirement health care plan for which (a) the employer has concluded that prescription drug benefits available under the plan to some or all participants for some or all future years are “actuarially equivalent” to Medicare Part D and thus qualify for the subsidy under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003; and (b) the expected subsidy will offset or reduce the employer’s share of the cost of the underlying postretirement prescription drug coverage on which the subsidy is based. FSP No. 106-2 became effective for us on September 1, 2004 and did not have a material effect on us.
table of contents
Volatility in interest rates and foreign exchange rates can impact our earnings, equity and cash flow. From time to time we undertake transactions to hedge this impact. Under governing accounting guidelines, a hedge instrument is considered effective if it offsets partially or completely the impact on earnings, equity and cash flow due to fluctuations in interest and foreign exchange rates. In accordance with our policy, we do not execute derivatives that are speculative or that increase our risk from interest rate or foreign exchange rate fluctuations.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on long-term debt obligations. We manage this risk through the use of a combination of fixed and variable rate debt (See Note 4 – Borrowings and Credit Facilities). At October 30, 2004 we were not party to any interest rate derivative contracts.
Foreign Currency Risk
Most of our foreign subsidiaries use local currencies as their functional currency. For consolidation purposes, assets and liabilities are translated at month-end exchange rates. Items of income and expense are translated at average exchange rates. Translation gains and losses are not included in determining net income (loss) but are accumulated as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Gains (losses) arising from foreign currency transactions are included in determining net income (loss). During Fiscal 2004, we incurred a loss of $570,000 arising from foreign currency transactions. Foreign exchange derivatives at October 30, 2004 were in the form of forward exchange contracts executed over the counter. There is a concentration of these contracts held with LaSalle Bank, N.A. as agent for ABN Amro Bank, N.V. which maintains an investment grade rating.
We have adopted a Foreign Exchange Risk Management Policy. It is a risk-averse policy under which significant exposures that impact earnings and cash flow are fully hedged. Exposures that impact only equity or do not have a cash flow impact are generally not hedged with derivatives. There are two categories of foreign exchange exposures that are hedged: assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency, which include net investment in a foreign subsidiary, and future committed receipts or payments denominated in a foreign currency. These exposures normally arise from imports and exports of goods and from intercompany trade and lending activity.
The fair value of our forward exchange contracts at October 30, 2004 is analyzed in the following table of dollar equivalent terms:
In thousands of US Dollars
| Maturing in 2005
|
---|
| Buy
| Sell
|
---|
U.S. Dollar | | | | (1,147 | ) | | 2,360 | |
Australian Dollar | | | | 13 | | | 1 | |
British Pound Sterling | | | | 106 | | | (3 | ) |
South African Rand | | | | (143 | ) | | (8 | ) |
Euro | | | | 33 | | | (21 | ) |
The table below provides information about our derivative financial instruments and presents such information in U.S. dollar equivalents. The table presents the net settlement amounts and weighted average exchange rates by expected (contractual) maturity dates. These net settlement amounts generally are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract.
Exchange Rate Sensitivity Table As of October 30, 2004
| |
---|
| Expected Maturity or Transaction Date (000,s)
| | |
---|
$US Functional Currency: Forward Exchange Agreements
| Fiscal 2005
| Fiscal 2006
| Fiscal 2007
| Fiscal 2008
| Fiscal 2009
| There- after
| Total
| Fair Value
|
---|
Receive AUD Pay ZAR Contract Amount | ($ 300.9) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 300.9) | ($ 14.6) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Average Rate | 0.7900 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.7900 |
Receive USD Pay ZAR Contract Amount | ($ 7,542.8) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 7,542.8) | ($ 957.5) |
Average Rate | 7.0290 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 7.0290 |
Receive GBP Pay ZAR Contract Amount | ($ 571.1) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 571.10) | ($ 38.3) |
Average Rate | 1.9784 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.9784 |
Pay USD Receive GBP Contract Amount | $ 106,473.2 | $ 4,109.2 | ($ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 110,582.3 | $ 2,125.9 |
Average Rate | 1.7787 | 1.7701 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.7784 |
Receive GBP Pay USD Contract Amount | ($ 10,038.2) | ($ 2,999.5) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 13,037.6) | $ 141.6 |
Average Rate | 1.8251 | 1.7313 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.8035 |
Pay USD Receive AUD Contract Amount | $ 4,723.1 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 4,723.1 | $ 44.8 |
Average Rate | 0.7212 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.7212 |
Receive AUD Pay USD Contract Amount | $ 11,435.7) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 11,435.7) | $ 28.7 |
Average Rate | 0.7233 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.7233 |
Receive EUR Pay USD Contract Amount | ($ 157.9) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 157.9) | $ 15.2 |
Average Rate | 1.1622 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.1622 |
Pay EUR Receive GBP Contract Amount | $ 2061.3 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 2,061.3 | ($ 3.2) |
Average Rate | 1.2753 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.2753 |
Receive ZAR Pay BWP Contract Amount | ($ 1,073.8) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 1,073.8) | ($ 151.1) |
Average Rate | 5.3316 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 5.3316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount | $ 82,137.3 | $ 1,109.7 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 83,247.0 | $ 1,191.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate Sensitivity Table As of November 1, 2003
| |
---|
| Expected Maturity or Transaction Date (000,s)
| | |
---|
$US Functional Currency: Forward Exchange Agreements
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2005
| Fiscal 2006
| Fiscal 2007
| Fiscal 2008
| There- after
| Total
| Fair Value
|
---|
Receive AUD Pay ZAR Contract Amount | ($ 90.0) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 90.0) | ($ 3.4) |
Average Rate | 0.7420 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.7420 |
Receive USD Pay ZAR Contract Amount | ($ 891.00) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 891.00) | ($ 514.1) |
Average Rate | 10.8211 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 10.8211 |
Receive GBP Pay ZAR Contract Amount | ($ 382.1) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 382.1) | ($ 43.7) |
Average Rate | 1.9472 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.9472 |
Pay USD Receive GBP Contract Amount | $ 12,089.4 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 12,089.4 | $ 325.9 |
Average Rate | 1.6329 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.6329 |
Receive GBP Pay USD Contract Amount | ($ 2,444.1) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 2,444.1) | $ 98.6 |
Average Rate | 1.6294 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.6294 |
Receive USD Pay AUD Contract Amount | ($ 15,540.6) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 15,540.6) | ($ 1,744.5) |
Average Rate | 0.6349 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.6349 |
Receive AUD Pay USD Contract Amount | ($ 2,037.3) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 2,037.3) | $ 4.8 |
Average Rate | 0.7025 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.7025 |
Pay ZAR Receive USD Contract Amount | $ 18,652.7 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 18,652.7 | ($ 199.4) |
Average Rate | 7.0365 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 7.0365 |
Receive AUD Pay GBP Contract Amount | ($ 9.6) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 9.6) | $ 0.0 |
Average Rate | 0.7035 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.7035 |
Pay EUR Receive GBP Contract Amount | $ 1,936.7 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 1,936.7 | $ 35.6 |
Average Rate | 1.1983 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.1983 |
Receive CAD Pay USD Contract Amount | ($ 0.6) | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | ($ 0.6) | $ 0.0 |
Average Rate | 1.3263 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.3263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount | $ 11,283.5 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 0.0 | $ 11,283.5 | ($ 2,040.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
table of contents
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data
The following table sets forth certain unaudited operating data for our four quarters ended October 30, 2004, and November 1, 2003.
| 2004 Fiscal Quarter Ended
|
---|
(In thousands except per share amounts)
| January 31
| May 1
| July 31
| October 30
|
---|
| | | | (1) |
---|
Net sales | | | $ | 283,686 | | $ | 337,682 | | $ | 381,920 | | $ | 428,879 | |
Gross profit | | | | 69,795 | | | 91,113 | | | 99,857 | | | 121,448 | |
Operating income | | | | 7,727 | | | 22,486 | | | 29,915 | | | 47,553 | |
Net income | | | | 938 | | | 18,840 | | | 16,255 | | | 19,289 | |
Earnings Per Share : | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | $ | 0.02 | | $ | 0.36 | | $ | 0.31 | | $ | 0.36 | |
Diluted | | | $ | 0.02 | | $ | 0.35 | | $ | 0.30 | | $ | 0.35 | |
Dividends Per Share | | | $ | 0.05 | | $ | 0.075 | | $ | 0.075 | | $ | 0.075 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2003 Fiscal Quarter Ended
|
---|
(In thousands except per share amounts)
| February 1
| May 3
| August 2
| November 1
|
---|
Net sales | | | $ | 239,161 | | $ | 298,888 | | $ | 300,091 | | $ | 377,826 | |
Gross profit | | | | 53,125 | | | 71,932 | | | 75,281 | | | 92,764 | |
Operating income (loss) | | | | (3,282 | ) | | 11,053 | | | 15,867 | | | 24,044 | |
Net income (loss) | | | | (5,527 | ) | | 2,397 | | | 6,541 | | | 15,105 | |
Earnings (Loss) Per Share - Basic and Diluted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share | | | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | 0.13 | | $ | 0.30 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
(1) For the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2004 our net income was adversely affected by an unusually high provision for income taxes attributable to a $13.4 million increase (including a $9.9 million adjustment) in our Australian deferred tax valuation reserves. The increase in the valuation reserves was due to concerns about the realizability of the underlying deferred tax assets. This item had the effect of decreasing fourth quarter net income by $13.4 million, or 27 cents per share on a fully-diluted basis. For a further discussion of this increase to our deferred tax valuation reserves, please see Item 7, under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations - 2004 Compared with 2003 - Provision for Income Taxes."
table of contents
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of October 30, 2004. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective (1) in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and (2) to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As part of the recent evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer specifically considered whether the matters that Ernst & Young identified as a material weakness in our internal controls (as described below under “Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”) might cause them to conclude that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of October 30, 2004, or had not been effective for earlier periods. Based on their review of the matters raised by Ernst & Young, they determined that the matters raised by Ernst & Young did not cause our disclosure controls and procedures not to be effective, for either the current period or earlier periods. This determination was based on the direct involvement of senior management in the final determination of the amount of deferred tax asset valuation reserves for all relevant periods, which was sufficient to ensure that (1) senior management at all times possessed all the information it needed to ensure that the relevant information would be properly disclosed on a timely basis and (2) the matters cited by Ernst & Young, which were technical and procedural in nature, could not have resulted in a material error going undetected before the public disclosure of our financial results for any such period.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2005, we will be subject to the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that require an annual management assessment of our internal control over financial reporting and related attestation by our independent accounting firm.
In the course of conducting its audit of our financial statements for Fiscal 2004, our independent accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”), informed members of our senior management and the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors that, in E&Y’s judgment, our procedures for assessing the need for a valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets in Australia involved a deficiency in internal controls. In E&Y’s view, this deficiency constituted a material weakness due to the amounts involved. The procedures that E&Y found deficient related to FAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” the accounting pronouncement that establishes the substantive standard for when a valuation allowance is necessary and provides guidance as to procedures that companies should follow in deciding whether an allowance is necessary. E&Y identified the following errors as the basis for its conclusion that there was a material weakness in our internal controls in connection with our accounting for deferred tax assets:
| (1) | that our assessment of the relative positive and negative evidence impacting the need for a valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets was not documented in connection with the preparation of our provision for income taxes; and |
| (2) | that when the documentation was subsequently prepared, the assessment did not comply with the requirements of FAS No. 109, because it did not include all available evidence and it did not consider whether such evidence was subject to objective verification. |
In addition, E&Y concluded that the technical and process errors described above had not been detected by our system of internal controls.
Accounting for deferred tax assets is a critical accounting policy that requires management to make various judgments, and our management believes that its controls in this area were sufficient. Nevertheless, we have enhanced the procedures we will follow in this area in future periods. Starting with the first quarter of Fiscal 2005, we plan to engage an independent tax consulting firm to assist with our evaluation of the judgmental issues concerning tax accounting and tax reserves. We will also ensure that all procedural steps appropriate under FAS No. 109 are fully complied with. These enhanced procedures have been reviewed by our Audit Committee. In addition, we anticipate that we will continue to make additional improvements to our internal controls in connection with our annual management assessments of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. For a further discussion of our valuation allowances against net deferred tax assets, please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies—Income Taxes” under Item 7.
With respect to our Fiscal 2004 financial statements and the provision for income taxes presented therein, we assured ourselves that Ernst & Young’s concerns were appropriately addressed by completing additional procedures consistent with FAS No. 109, including a careful assessment by all of our appropriate financial and accounting officers (including the Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Vice President for Taxes) of all available positive and negative evidence as to whether a valuation allowance was needed. In addition, we reviewed all of the supporting calculations and assumptions associated with all of our deferred tax assets worldwide.
table of contents
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements:
The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted in a separate section of this report. See the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules of Joy Global Inc. attached hereto and listed on the index to this report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules:
The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted in a separate section of this report. See the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules of Joy Global Inc. attached hereto and listed on the index to this report.
Exhibits
| Number
| Exhibit
|
| 2.1 | Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization, as modified, of the Debtors Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to current report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 8-K dated July 12, 2001, File No. 01-9299). |
| 3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Joy Global Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to current report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 8-K dated July 12, 2001, File No. 01-9299). |
| 3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Joy Global Inc., as amended January 15, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2001, File No. 01-9299). |
| 3.3 | Certificate of Designations of Joy Global Inc. dated July 15, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 3, 2002, File No. 01-9299). |
| 4.1 | Specimen common stock certificate of Joy Global Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to current report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 8-K dated July 12, 2001, File No. 01-9299). |
| 4.2 | Indenture dated as of March 18, 2002, among Joy Global Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. relating to 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to current report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 8-K dated March 13, 2002, File No. 01-9299). |
| 4.3 | Form of 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to current report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 8-K dated March 13, 2002, File No. 01-9299). |
| 4.4 | Rights Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2002, between Joy Global Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent, including the Form of Certificate of Designations, the Form of Rights Certificate and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares attached thereto as Exhibits A, B and C (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Joy Global Inc.’s Form 8-A filed on July 17, 2002, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.1 | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2002, among Joy Global inc. as Borrower, the lenders listed therein, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Agents, Heller Financial, Inc. and Fleet Capital Corporation, as Co-Syndication Agents, CIT Group/Business Credit, as Documentation Agent and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Sole Book Running Manager (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 3, 2002, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.2 | First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of October 31, 2002 and entered into by and among Joy Global Inc., as Borrower, the lenders named therein, as Lenders, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Agents, Heller Financial, Inc. and Fleet Capital Corporation, as Co-Syndication Agents, and CIT Group/Business Credit, as Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended November 2, 2002, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.3 | Joy Global Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended October 16, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2001, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.4 | Harnischfeger Industries, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of June 3, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to report of Harnischfeger Industries, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 1999, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.5 | Form of Change in Control Agreement made and entered into as of September 30, 1999, between Harnischfeger Industries, Inc. and James A. Chokey and John Nils Hanson and made and entered into as of May 22, 2000, and June 11, 2001, with Dennis R. Winkleman and Donald C. Roof, respectively (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2001, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.6 | Change in Control Agreement made and entered into as of November 17, 2000 by and between Harnischfeger Industries, Inc. and Michael S. Olsen (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2001, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.7 | Form of Stock Option Agreement dated July 16, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2001, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.8 | Form of Performance Unit Agreement entered into as of August 27, 2001, between Joy Global Inc. and James A. Chokey, John Nils Hanson, Michael S. Olsen, Donald C. Roof and Dennis R. Winkleman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2001, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.9 | Form of Stock Option Agreement dated November 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2001, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.10 | Joy Global Inc. Annual Bonus Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2001, File No. 01-9299).* |
| 10.11 | Form of Stock Option Agreement dated February 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (a) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 2, 2002, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.12 | Form of Director Stock Option Agreement dated February 27, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 3, 2002, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.13 | Form of Stock Option Agreement dated May 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 3, 2002, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.14 | Form of Director Stock Option Agreement dated July 16, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 3, 2002, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.15 | Form of Performance Unit Agreement entered into as of November 18, 2002, between Joy Global Inc. and James A. Chokey, John Nils Hanson, Michael S. Olsen, Donald C. Roof, Dennis R. Winkleman, Michael W. Sutherlin and Mark E. Readinger (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(o) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended November 2, 2002, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.16 | Form of Stock Option Agreement dated November 18, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(p) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended November 2, 2002, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.17 | Amendment No. 1 to Joy Global Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2003, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.18 | Joy Global Inc. 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2003, File No. 01-9299). * |
| 10.19 | Form of Change of Control Employment Agreement dated as of May 20, 2003. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(t) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended November 1, 2003, File No. 01-9299)* |
| 10.20 | Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 26, 2003 and entered into by and among Joy Global Inc., as Borrower, the lenders named therein, as Lenders, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Agents, Heller Financial, Inc. and Fleet Capital Corporation, as Co-Syndication Agents, and CIT Group/Business Credit, as Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(u) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended November 1, 2003, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.21 | Form of Amendment to Performance Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(v) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended November 1, 2003, File No. 01-9299).* |
| 10.22 | First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Consent dated as of April 19, 2004 and entered into by and among Joy Global Inc., as Borrower, the lenders named therein, as Lenders, Deutsche Bank Trust Company America, as Agent, Heller Financial, Inc. and Fleet Capital Corporation, as Co-Syndication Agents, and CIT Group/Business Credit, as Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2004, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.23 | Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated May 8, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2004, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.24 | Form of Stock Option Agreement entered into as of January 21, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2004, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.25 | Form of Performance Unit Agreement entered into as of January 21, 2004 between Joy Global Inc. and James A. Chokey, John Nils Hanson, Mark E. Readinger, Donald C. Roof, Michael W. Sutherlin and Dennis R. Winkleman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2004, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.26 | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement entered into as of January 21, 2004 between Joy Global Inc. and James A. Chokey, John Nils Hanson, Mark E. Readinger, Donald C. Roof, Michael W. Sutherlin and Dennis R. Winkleman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2004, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.27 | Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 8-K dated February 10, 2004, File No. 01-9299). |
| 10.28 | Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated February 24, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to report of Joy Global Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2004, File No. 01-9299). |
| 21 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant. ** |
| 23 | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. |
| 24 | Powers of Attorney. ** |
| 31.1 | Chief Executive Officer Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications. |
| 31.2 | Chief Financial Officer Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications. |
| 32 | Section 1350 Certifications. |
| * | Represents a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(c) of Form 10-K. |
| ** | Previously filed as exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2004. |
Joy Global Inc.
Form 10-K Item 8 and Items 15(a)(1) and 15(a)(2)
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
And Financial Statement Schedule
The following Consolidated Financial Statements of Joy Global Inc. and the related Report of Independent Accountants are included in Item 8 –Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and Item 15 –Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules:
Item 15(a) (1):
|
|
---|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
| |
Consolidated Statement of Income for the fiscal years ended October 30, | |
2004, November 1, 2003 and November 2, 2002 |
Consolidated Balance Sheet at October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003 | |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended October 30, | |
2004, November 1, 2003 and November 2, 2002 | |
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity for fiscal years | |
ended October 30, 2004, November 1, 2003 and November 2, 2002 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| |
The following Consolidated Financial Statement schedule of Joy Global Inc. is included in Item 15(a)(2):
All other schedules are omitted because they are either not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Joy Global Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Joy Global Inc. as of October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 30, 2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Joy Global Inc. at October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 30, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement and schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
December 15, 2004
| Fiscal Years Ended
|
---|
| October 30, 2004
| November 1, 2003
| November 2, 2002
|
---|
Net sales | | | $ | 1,432,167 | | $ | 1,215,966 | | $ | 1,150,847 | |
Cost of sales | | | | 1,049,954 | | | 922,864 | | | 954,290 | |
Product development, selling | | | | | | | | | | | |
and administrative expenses | | | | 277,412 | | | 241,507 | | | 212,821 | |
Other income | | | | (3,505 | ) | | (3,002 | ) | | (1,121 | ) |
Restructuring charges | | | | 625 | | | 6,915 | | | -- | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Operating income (loss) | | | | 107,681 | | | 47,682 | | | (15,143 | ) |
Interest income | | | | 4,333 | | | 5,065 | | | 3,233 | |
Interest expense | | | | (24,284 | ) | | (27,031 | ) | | (31,038 | ) |
Loss on early retirement of debt | | | | -- | | | (261 | ) | | (8,100 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Income (loss) before reorganization items | | | | 87,730 | | | 25,455 | | | (51,048 | ) |
Reorganization items | | | | 6,842 | | | 2,411 | | | 7,230 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Income (loss) before income taxes and | | | | | | | | | | | |
minority interest | | | | 94,572 | | | 27,866 | | | (43,818 | ) |
(Provision) benefit for income taxes | | | | (39,250 | ) | | (9,350 | ) | | 17,475 | |
Minority interest | | | | -- | | | -- | | | (1,674 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net income (loss) | | | $ | 55,322 | | $ | 18,516 | | $ | (28,017 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net income (loss) per share: (Note 9) | | |
Basic | | | $ | 1.06 | | $ | 0.37 | | $ | (0.56 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Diluted | | | $ | 1.03 | | $ | 0.37 | | $ | (0.56 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Average common shares (for per share purposes) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | | 52,123 | | | 50,242 | | | 50,169 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Diluted | | | | 53,624 | | | 50,577 | | | 50,169 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| October 30, 2004
| November 1, 2003
|
---|
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Current Assets | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 231,706 | | $ | 148,505 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | | 259,897 | | | 193,882 | |
Inventories | | | | 443,810 | | | 382,929 | |
Other current assets | | | | 56,639 | | | 51,251 | |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Total Current Assets | | | | 992,052 | | | 776,567 | |
|
| |
| |
Property, Plant and Equipment: | | |
Land and improvements | | | | 14,388 | | | 13,940 | |
Buildings | | | | 73,649 | | | 69,392 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | | 227,507 | | | 213,705 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | 315,544 | | | 297,037 | |
Accumulated depreciation | | | | (107,570 | ) | | (70,936 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| | |
| | | | 207,974 | | | 226,101 | |
|
| |
| |
Other Assets: | | |
Intangible assets, net | | | | 40,213 | | | 77,709 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | | 129,424 | | | 136,192 | |
Other non-current assets | | | | 70,696 | | | 70,160 | |
|
| |
| |
| | |
| | | | 240,333 | | | 284,061 | |
|
| |
| |
Total Assets | | | $ | 1,440,359 | | $ | 1,286,729 | |
|
| |
| |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities | | |
Short-term notes payable, including current | | | | | | | | |
portion of long-term obligations | | | $ | 3,110 | | $ | 4,767 | |
��Trade accounts payable | | | | 139,178 | | | 89,136 | |
Employee compensation and benefits | | | | 82,472 | | | 57,688 | |
Advance payments and progress billings | | | | 87,507 | | | 36,676 | |
Accrued warranties | | | | 31,259 | | | 30,443 | |
Income taxes payable | | | | 4,910 | | | 26,097 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | | 83,416 | | | 80,899 | |
|
| |
| |
Total Current Liabilities | | | | 431,852 | | | 325,706 | |
|
| |
| |
Long-term Obligations | | | | 202,869 | | | 202,912 | |
Other Non-current Liabilities: | | |
Liability for postretirement benefits | | | | 44,345 | | | 44,992 | |
Accrued pension costs | | | | 268,933 | | | 313,214 | |
Other | | | | 40,312 | | | 29,632 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | 353,590 | | | 387,838 | |
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 17) | | | | -- | | | -- | |
Shareholders' Equity | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $1 par value | | |
(authorized 150,000,000 shares; 53,239,858 and | | |
50,373,567 deemed shares issued at October 30, | | |
2004 and November 1, 2003, respectively.) | | | | 53,240 | | | 50,373 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | | | 640,883 | | | 587,459 | |
Retained earnings (deficit) | | | | (45,042 | ) | | (85,999 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | | (197,033 | ) | | (181,560 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Total Shareholders' Equity | | | | 452,048 | | | 370,273 | |
|
| |
| |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | | | $ | 1,440,359 | | $ | 1,286,729 | |
|
| |
| |
| Fiscal Years Ended
|
---|
| October 30, 2004
| November 1, 2003
| November 2, 2002
|
---|
Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | $ | 55,322 | | $ | 18,516 | | $ | (28,017 | ) |
Add (deduct) - items not affecting cash: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | | -- | | | 261 | | | 8,100 | |
Minority interest | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 1,674 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | 46,177 | | | 52,542 | | | 59,137 | |
Amortization of financing fees | | | | 3,190 | | | 3,546 | | | 3,515 | |
Fresh start inventory adjustment taken to cost of sales | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 53,560 | |
Increase (decrease) in deferred income taxes, net | | | | | | | | | | | |
of change in valuation allowance | | | | (2,390 | ) | | (11,642 | ) | | (42,189 | ) |
Change in long-term accrued pension costs | | | | 15,031 | | | (1,121 | ) | | (9,715 | ) |
Other, net | | | | 2,151 | | | 3,645 | | | 1,007 | |
Contributions to U.S. qualified pension plans | | | | (88,104 | ) | | (47,612 | ) | | (3,451 | ) |
Changes in Working Capital Items: | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash | | | | -- | | | 253 | | | 19,160 | |
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net | | | | (57,719 | ) | | (10,510 | ) | | 43,553 | |
(Increase) decrease in inventories | | | | (48,146 | ) | | 65,293 | | | 51,017 | |
(Increase) decrease in other current assets | | | | 4,750 | | | 7,124 | | | (3,702 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in trade accounts payable | | | | 45,442 | | | 7,601 | | | (5,270 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in employee compensation and benefits | | | | 30,037 | | | 30,753 | | | 1,358 | |
Increase (decrease) in advance payments and progress billings | | | | 49,290 | | | 5,695 | | | 9,785 | |
Increase (decrease) in other accrued liabilities | | | | 7,230 | | | (18,699 | ) | | (31,981 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | | 62,261 | | | 105,645 | | | 127,541 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Investment Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment acquired | | | | (18,718 | ) | | (27,512 | ) | | (19,087 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | | | | 2,330 | | | 2,996 | | | 3,176 | |
Purchase of equity interest in subsidiary | | | | -- | | | (12,316 | ) | | -- | |
Other, net | | | | 5,251 | | | 6,285 | | | 4,266 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net cash used by investment activities | | | | (11,137 | ) | | (30,547 | ) | | (11,645 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercise of stock options | | | | 44,716 | | | 1,917 | | | -- | |
Dividends paid | | | | (14,026 | ) | | -- | | | -- | |
Increase (decrease) in short-term notes payable | | | | (1,080 | ) | | 1,512 | | | 1,865 | |
Payments on long-term obligations | | | | (1,010 | ) | | (13,174 | ) | | (814 | ) |
Financing fees | | | | (1,000 | ) | | (250 | ) | | (9,136 | ) |
Issuance of 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 200,000 | |
Redemption of 10.75% Senior Notes | | | | -- | | | -- | | | (113,686 | ) |
Payment of Term Loan | | | | -- | | | -- | | | (100,000 | ) |
Payment of Credit Agreement | | | | -- | | | -- | | | (63,930 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | | | | 27,600 | | | (9,995 | ) | | (85,701 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Equivalents | | | | 4,477 | | | 12,496 | | | 1,059 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | | 83,201 | | | 77,599 | | | 31,254 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period | | | | 148,505 | | | 70,906 | | | 39,652 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | | | $ | 231,706 | | $ | 148,505 | | $ | 70,906 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Supplemental cash flow information | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | | $ | 22,022 | | $ | 23,075 | | $ | 27,732 | |
Income taxes paid | | | | 13,745 | | | 19,067 | | | 19,283 | |
| Common Stock | Capital in Excess of | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive | |
---|
| Shares
| Amount
| Par Value
| (Deficit)
| Income (Loss)
| Total
|
---|
Balance at October 31, 2001 | | | | 50,000 | | $ | 50,000 | | $ | 581,898 | | $ | (76,498 | ) | $ | (71,693 | ) | $ | 483,707 | |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | |
Net loss | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | (28,017 | ) | | -- | | | (28,017 | ) |
Change in additional minimum pension liability | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | (114,176 | ) | | (114,176 | ) |
Derivative instrument fair market value adjustment | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | (643 | ) | | (643 | ) |
Currency translation adjustment | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | 6,045 | | | 6,045 | |
Total comprehensive loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (136,791 | ) |
Issuance of stock as professional fee payment | | | | 228 | | | 228 | | | 3,472 | | | -- | | | -- | | | 3,700 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at November 2, 2002 | | | | 50,228 | | $ | 50,228 | | $ | 585,370 | | $ | (104,515 | ) | $ | (180,467 | ) | $ | 350,616 | |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | 18,516 | | | -- | | | 18,516 | |
Change in additional minimum pension liability | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | (33,652 | ) | | (33,652 | ) |
Derivative instrument fair market value adjustment | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | 585 | | | 585 | |
Currency translation adjustment | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | 31,974 | | | 31,974 | |
Total comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 17,423 | |
Exercise of stock options | | | | 145 | | | 145 | | | 1,910 | | | -- | | | -- | | * | 2,055 | |
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 179 | | | -- | | | -- | | | 179 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at November 1, 2003 | | | | 50,373 | | $ | 50,373 | | $ | 587,459 | | $ | (85,999 | ) | $ | (181,560 | ) | $ | 370,273 | |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | 55,322 | | | -- | | | 55,322 | |
Dividends | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | (14,365 | ) | | -- | | | (14,365 | ) |
Change in additional minimum pension liability | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | (22,158 | ) | | (22,158 | ) |
Derivative instrument fair market value adjustment | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | 3,088 | | | 3,088 | |
Currency translation adjustment | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | 3,597 | | | 3,597 | |
Total comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 25,484 | |
Exercise of stock options | | | | 2,867 | | | 2,867 | | | 41,711 | | | -- | | | -- | | * | 44,578 | |
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 11,713 | | | -- | | | -- | | | 11,713 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at October 30, 2004 | | | | 53,240 | | $ | 53,240 | | $ | 640,883 | | $ | (45,042 | ) | $ | (197,033 | ) | $ | 452,048 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
* - Difference between Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows represents $138 of cash received in Fiscal 2004 relating to stock options exercised in Fiscal 2003.
1. Description of Business
Joy Global Inc. is the world’s leading manufacturer and servicer of high productivity mining equipment for the extraction of coal and other minerals and ores. Our equipment is used in major mining centers throughout the world to mine coal, copper, iron ore, oil sands and other minerals. We operate in two business segments: underground mining machinery (Joy Mining Machinery or “Joy”) and surface mining equipment (P&H Mining Equipment or “P&H”). Joy is a major manufacturer of underground mining equipment for the extraction of coal and other bedded minerals and offers comprehensive service locations near major mining regions worldwide. P&H is a major producer of surface mining equipment for the extraction of ores and minerals and provides extensive operational support for many types of equipment used in surface mining.
We are the direct successor to a business begun 120 years ago and were known as Harnischfeger Industries, Inc. (the “Predecessor Company”) prior to our emergence from protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on July 12, 2001 (the “Effective Date”).
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are as follows:
Basis of Presentation — The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Joy Global Inc. and our subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Principles of Consolidation — The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Ultimate realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the future could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents — All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. These primarily consist of money market funds and to a lesser extent, certificates of deposit and commercial paper. Cash equivalents were $189.5 million and $108.0 million at October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003, respectively.
Inventories— Our inventories are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method for all inventories. We evaluate the need to record adjustments for inventory on a regular basis. Our policy is to evaluate all inventory including raw material, work-in-process, finished goods, and spare parts. Inventory in excess of our estimated usage requirements is written down to its estimated net realizable value. Inherent in the estimates of net realizable value are our estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, possible alternative uses and ultimate realization of potentially excess inventory.
Property, Plant and Equipment — Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost. Expenditures for major renewals and improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repair costs that do not significantly improve the related asset or extend its useful life are charged to expense as incurred. For financial reporting purposes, plant and equipment are depreciated primarily by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets which generally range from 5 to 20 years for improvements, from 33 to 50 years for buildings and from 3 to 15 years for machinery and equipment. Depreciation expense was $38.4 million, $36.8 million and $36.5 million for Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003, and Fiscal 2002, respectively. Depreciation claimed for income tax purposes is computed by accelerated methods.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets — Our policy is to assess the realizability of our held and used long-lived assets and to evaluate such assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets (or group of assets) may not be recoverable. Impairment is determined to exist if the estimated future undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying value. The amount of any impairment then recognized is calculated as the difference between the estimated future discounted cash flow and the carrying value of the asset.
Intangible Assets —Intangible assets include software, drawings, patents, trademarks, technology and other specifically identifiable assets. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not being amortized; however, they are evaluated annually, or more frequently if events or changes occur that suggest impairment in carrying value. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method.
Other Non-current Assets — Other non-current assets primarily include prepaid pension assets, deferred financing costs related to the credit agreement and bond issuance costs which are being amortized over the terms of the credit agreement and bonds, respectively.
Foreign Currency Translation — Exchange gains or losses incurred on transactions conducted by one of our operations in a currency other than the operation’s functional currency are normally reflected in cost of sales in our Consolidated Statement of Income. An exception is made where the transaction is a long-term intercompany loan that is not expected to be repaid in the foreseeable future, in which case the transaction gain or loss is included in shareholders’ equity as an element of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Assets and liabilities of international operations that have a functional currency that is not the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates and revenue and expense items are translated using weighted average exchange rates. Any adjustments arising on translations are included in shareholders’ equity as an element of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Assets and liabilities of operations which have the U.S. dollar as their functional currency (but which maintain their accounting records in local currency) have their values remeasured into U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates, except for non-monetary items for which historical rates are used. Exchange gains or losses arising on remeasurement of the values into U.S. dollars are recognized in cost of sales. Pre-tax foreign exchange gains (losses) included in operating income were $(0.6) million, $(0.3) million and $0.1 million for Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003, and Fiscal 2002, respectively.
Foreign Currency Hedging and Derivative Financial Instruments — We enter into derivative contracts, primarily foreign currency forward contracts, to protect against fluctuations in exchange rates. These contracts are for committed transactions, receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies and net investment hedges and not for speculative purposes. All current contracts mature within 12 months. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended, requires companies to record derivatives on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value. Any changes in fair value of these instruments are recorded in the income statement or in the balance sheet as other comprehensive income.
During Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, there were no derivative instruments that were deemed to be ineffective. The amounts included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss will be reclassified into income when the forecasted transaction occurs, generally within the next twelve months.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) — SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, requires the reporting of comprehensive income in addition to net income. Comprehensive income is a more inclusive financial reporting method that includes disclosure of financial information that historically has not been recognized in the calculation of net income. We have chosen to report Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) which encompasses net income, foreign currency translation, minimum pension liability and unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity. Cumulative balances for foreign currency translation, minimum pension liability and unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives were $38.5 million and $(239.0) million and $3.5 million, respectively, at October 30, 2004, $34.9 million and $(216.9) million and $0.4 million, respectively, at November 1, 2003 and $3.0 million and $(183.2) million and $(0.2) million, respectively, at November 2, 2002.
Revenue Recognition — We generally recognize revenue at the time of shipment and passage of title for sales of products and at the time of performance for sales of services. We recognize revenue on long-term contracts, such as the manufacture of mining shovels, drills, draglines and roof support systems, using either the percentage-of-completion or the inventory sales methods. When using the percentage-of-completion method, sales and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred and total estimated costs at completion. Sales and gross profit are adjusted prospectively for revisions in estimated total contract costs and contract values. Estimated losses are recognized in full when identified.
We have life cycle management contracts with customers to supply parts and service for terms of 1 to 13 years. These contracts are set up based on the projected costs and revenues of servicing the respective machines over the specified contract terms. Accounting for these contracts requires us to make various estimates, including estimates of the relevant machine's long-term maintenance requirements. Under these contracts, customers are generally billed monthly and the respective deferred revenues are recorded when billed. Revenue is recognized in the period in which parts are supplied or services provided. These contracts are reviewed periodically and revenue recognition is adjusted appropriately for future estimated costs. If a loss is expected at any time, the full amount of the loss is recognized immediately.
Revenue recognition involves judgments, assessments of expected returns, the likelihood of nonpayment, and estimates of expected costs and profits on long-term contracts. We analyze various factors, including a review of specific transactions, historical experience, credit-worthiness of customers and current market and economic conditions, in determining when to recognize revenue. Changes in judgments on these factors could impact the timing and amount of revenue recognized with a resulting impact on the timing and amount of associated income.
Income Taxes — Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities, and for tax loss carryforwards. Valuation allowances are provided for deferred tax assets where it is considered more likely than not that we will not realize the benefit of such assets. Certain tax benefits existed as of the Effective Date but were offset by valuation allowances. The utilization of these pre-emergence benefits to reduce income taxes paid to federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions does not reduce our income tax expense. Realization of net operating loss, tax credits and other deferred tax benefits from pre-emergence attributes will first reduce other intangibles until exhausted, and thereafter will be credited to additional paid in capital.
Accounting For Stock Options — The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations and complies with the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,”(“SFAS 123”), as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure.”
The Company is required under SFAS 123 to disclose pro forma information regarding the stock awards made to its employees based on specified valuation techniques that produce estimated compensation charges. The pro forma information is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Net income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | $ 55,322 | | | $ 18,516 | | | $ (28,017) | | |
Stock-based compensation expense included in | | | | | | | | | | | |
reported net income, net of related taxes | | | 9,363 | | | 2,852 | | | -- | | |
Stock -based compensation expense determined | | |
under SFAS No. 123, net of related taxes | | | (9,097) | | | (6,977) | | | (8,176) | | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | | |
Pro forma | | | $ 55,588 | | | $ 14,391 | | | $ (36,193) | | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net income (loss) per share: | | |
Basic, as reported | | | $ 1.06 | | | $.0.37 | | | $ (0.56) | | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Basic, pro forma | | | $ 1.07 | | | $.0.28 | | | $ (0.72) | | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Diluted, as reported | | | $ 1.03 | | | $.0.37 | | | $ (0.56) | | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Diluted, pro forma | | | $ 1.04 | | | $.0.28 | | | $ (0.72) | | |
|
| |
| |
| |
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002 were $5.9 million, $5.3 million and $21.1 million, respectively. The fair value of these stock awards at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Risk free interest rate | | | | 4.2 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.4 | % |
Expected volatility | | | | 51 | % | | 37 | % | | 59 | % |
Expected life | | | | 5.0 | | | 7.0 | | | 7.0 | |
Dividend yield | | | | 1.14 | % | | | -- | | | -- |
Research and Development Expenses — Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Such costs incurred in the development of new products or significant improvements to existing products amounted to $8.3 million, $6.6 million and $6.5 million for Fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Earnings Per Share — Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted income (loss) per common share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the weighted average number of shares outstanding is increased to include additional shares from the assumed exercise of stock options, performance units and restricted stock if dilutive. See Note 9 –Earnings Per Share for further information.
New Accounting Pronouncements — On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-BasedPayments” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.”The FASB has concluded that companies could adopt the new standard in one of two ways: the modified prospective transition method and the modified retrospective transition method. Using the modified prospective transition method, a company would recognize share-based employee compensation cost from the beginning of the fiscal period in which the recognition provisions are first applied as if the fair-value-based accounting method had been used to account for all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after the effective date and to any awards that were not fully vested as of the effective date. Using the modified retrospective method, a company would recognize employee compensation cost for periods presented prior to the adoption of the proposed standard in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123; that is, an entity would recognize employee compensation cost in the amounts reported in the pro forma disclosures provided in accordance with SFAS No. 123. A company would not be permitted to make any changes to those amounts upon adoption of the proposed standard unless those changes represent a correction of an error (and are disclosed accordingly). For periods after the date of adoption of the proposed standard, the modified prospective transition method described above would be applied. We will adopt SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) on July 31, 2005 and will continue to evaluate the impact the adoption of this standard will have on our results of operations.
On May 19, 2004, FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the MedicarePrescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.” This staff position applies to the sponsor of a single-employer defined benefit postretirement health care plan for which (a) the employer has concluded that prescription drug benefits available under the plan to some or all participants for some or all future years are “actuarially equivalent” to Medicare Part D and thus qualify for the subsidy under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003; and (b) the expected subsidy will offset or reduce the employer’s share of the cost of the underlying postretirement prescription drug coverage on which the subsidy is based. FSP No. 106-2 became effective for the Company on September 1, 2004 and did not have a material effect on the Company.
3.Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are tested for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” We have completed an impairment analysis of our indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142 and have determined that an impairment charge is not required.
| | October 30, 2004
| November 1, 2003
|
---|
In thousands
| Estimated Useful Lives
| Gross Carrying Amount
| Accumulated Amortization
| Gross Carrying Amount
| Accumulated Amortization
|
---|
Finite lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Software | | | 3 years | | | $ | 23,420 | | $ | (20,638 | ) | $ | 21,112 | | $ | (16,524 | ) |
Engineering drawings | | | 10-15 years | | | | 3,432 | (1) | | (698 | ) | | 10,535 | (1) | | (4,299 | ) |
Repair and maintenance contracts | | | 2-5 years | | | | 1,208 | (1) | | (645 | ) | | 8,625 | (1) | | (6,582 | ) |
Patents | | | 11-14 years | | | | 7,131 | (1) | | (2,828 | ) | | 12,924 | (1) | | (4,960 | ) |
Unpatented technology | | | 35 years | | | | 16,858 | | | (970 | ) | | 35,632 | | | (2,722 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Subtotal | | | | | | | 52,049 | | | (25,779 | ) | | 88,828 | | | (35,087 | ) |
Indefinite lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trademarks | | | | | | | 9,486 | | | -- | | | 19,777 | | | -- | |
Pension | | | | | | | 4,457 | | | -- | | | 4,191 | | | -- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Subtotal | | | | | | | 13,943 | | | -- | | | 23,968 | | | -- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total intangible assets | | | | | | $ | 65,992 | | $ | (25,779 | ) | $ | 112,796 | | $ | (35,087 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(1) During Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, we adjusted valuation allowances and other tax reserves (see Note 5 –Income Taxes). In accordance with the provisions of SOP 90-7 and FAS No. 109, adjustments to these allowances and other tax reserves that existed as of the emergence date will first reduce any excess reorganization value until exhausted, then other intangibles until exhausted, and thereafter will be reported as additional paid in capital.
The following table summarizes the impact of the tax valuation allowance and tax reserve adjustments on our intangible assets. Intangible assets were allocated on a pro rata share based on their net carrying value.
In thousands
| Gross Carrying Amount
| Valuation Allowance and Other Tax Reserves
| Adjusted Carrying Amount
|
---|
Fiscal 2004 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trademarks | | | | 19,777 | | | (10,291 | ) | | 9,486 | |
Unpatented technology | | | | 32,911 | | | (16,053 | ) | | 16,858 | |
Engineering drawings | | | | 6,235 | | | (2,803 | ) | | 3,432 | |
Patents | | | | 9,511 | | | (2,380 | ) | | 7,131 | |
Repair and maintenance contracts | | | | 2,042 | | | (834 | ) | | 1,208 | |
Software | | | | 23,420 | | | -- | | | 23,420 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | | $ | 93,896 | | $ | (32,361 | ) | $ | 61,535 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Fiscal 2003 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trademarks | | | | 50,963 | | | (31,186 | ) | | 19,777 | |
Unpatented technology | | | | 85,749 | | | (50,117 | ) | | 35,632 | |
Engineering drawings | | | | 20,103 | | | (9,568 | ) | | 10,535 | |
Patents | | | | 20,962 | | | (8,038 | ) | | 12,924 | |
Repair and maintenance contracts | | | | 12,259 | | | (3,634 | ) | | 8,625 | |
Software | | | | 21,112 | | | -- | | | 21,112 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | | $ | 211,148 | | $ | (102,543 | ) | $ | 108,605 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Amortization expense was $7.8 million, $15.7 million and $22.6 million for Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002, respectively. Estimated future annual amortization expense is as follows:
In thousands
|
---|
For the fiscal year ending: |
2005 | | $4,837 | |
2006 | | 2,339 | |
2007 | | 1,521 | |
2008 | | 1,103 | |
2009 | | 1,103 | |
Trademarks are not amortized but will be reviewed for impairment annually. Our reportable segments have been defined as reporting units for purposes of testing intangible assets for impairment.
4. Borrowings and Credit Facilities
On January 23, 2004, we entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) relating to a $200 million revolving credit facility maturing on October 15, 2008. Substantially all of our assets and our domestic subsidiaries’ assets, other than real estate, are pledged as collateral under the Credit Agreement. Outstanding borrowings bear interest equal to either LIBOR plus the applicable margin (3.25% to 2.00%) or the Base Rate (defined as the higher of the Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50%) plus the applicable margin (2.25% to 1.00%) at our option depending on certain of our financial ratios. We pay a commitment fee ranging from 0.50% to 0.75% on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility. In 2002, we issued $200 million in 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due March 15, 2012. We have since repurchased $14.5 million of these notes subsequent to our fiscal year-end.
Both the Credit Agreement and Senior Subordinated Note Indenture contain restrictions and financial covenants relating to, among other things, minimum financial performance and limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, liens, asset sales, and capital expenditures. The covenants in the Senior Subordinated Note Indenture are generally less restrictive than the covenants in the Credit Agreement. Interest coverage, leverage and fixed charge coverage covenants in the Credit Agreement generally become more restrictive over the term of the agreement. At October 30, 2004, we were in compliance with all financial covenants in the Credit Agreement and the Indenture.
At October 30, 2004, there were no outstanding direct borrowings under the Credit Agreement. Outstanding letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreement, which count toward the $200 million credit limit, totaled $79.8 million. The amount available for borrowings under the Credit Agreement is also limited by a borrowing base calculation. At October 30, 2004, there was $120.2 million available for borrowings under the Credit Agreement.
Direct borrowings and capital lease obligations consisted of the following:
In thousands
| October 30, 2004
| November 1, 2003
|
---|
Domestic: | | | | | | | | |
Credit Facility | | | $ | -- | | $ | -- | |
8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes | | | | 200,000 | | | 200,000 | |
Capital leases | | | | 230 | | | 649 | |
Foreign: | | | | | | | | |
Capital leases | | | | 3,185 | | | 3,345 | |
Other | | | | 267 | | | 308 | |
Short-term notes payable and bank overdrafts | | | | 2,297 | | | 3,377 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | 205,979 | | | 207,679 | |
Less: Amounts due within one year | | | | (3,110 | ) | | (4,767 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Long-term Obligations | | | $ | 202,869 | | $ | 202,912 | |
|
| |
| |
The aggregate maturities of debt consist of the following (in thousands): FY 2005 —$3,110; FY 2006 — $952; FY 2007 — $399; FY 2008 — $451, FY 2009 and thereafter — $201,067.
5. Income Taxes
The consolidated provision (benefit) for income taxes included in the Consolidated Statement of Income consisted of the following:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Current provision (benefit) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | | $ | 12,058 | | $ | 1,131 | | $ | (6,124 | ) |
State | | | | 821 | | | 517 | | | 311 | |
Foreign | | | | 15,028 | | | 20,949 | | | 12,133 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total current | | | | 27,907 | | | 22,597 | | | 6,320 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Deferred provision (benefit) | | |
Federal | | | | 4,880 | | | (3,497 | ) | | (22,807 | ) |
State | | | | 1,508 | | | (500 | ) | | (3,258 | ) |
Foreign | | | | 4,955 | | | (9,250 | ) | | 2,270 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total deferred | | | | 11,343 | | | (13,247 | ) | | (23,795 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total consolidated income tax | | | | | | | | | | | |
provision (benefit) | | | $ | 39,250 | | $ | 9,350 | | $ | (17,475 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
The components of income (loss) for our domestic and foreign operations were as follows:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Domestic income (loss) | | | $ | 53,017 | | $ | (6,980 | ) | $ | (83,671 | ) |
Foreign income (loss) | | | | 41,555 | | | 34,846 | | | 39,853 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Pre-tax income (loss) from | | |
continuing operations | | | $ | 94,572 | | $ | 27,866 | | $ | (43,818 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
The reconciliation between the income tax provisions (benefits) recognized in our Consolidated Statement of Income and the income tax provisions (benefits) computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to the income (loss) from continuing operations are as follows:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Income tax computed at federal | | | | | | | | | | | |
statutory tax rate | | | $ | 33,101 | | $ | 9,753 | | $ | (15,336 | ) |
Sub-part F income and foreign | | | | | | | | | | | |
dividends | | | | 3,703 | | | 1,414 | | | 4,437 | |
EIE Income Exclusion | | | | -- | | | -- | | | (1,190 | ) |
Tax on Undistributed Foreign Earnings | | | | (5,509 | ) | | 5,509 | | | -- | |
Differences in foreign and U.S. | | |
tax rates | | | | (6,098 | ) | | (4,807 | ) | | (718 | ) |
State income taxes, net of federal | | | | | | | | | | | |
tax impact | | | | (1,464 | ) | | (255 | ) | | (3,724 | ) |
Resolution of Prior Years' Tax Issues | | | | (3,492 | ) | | (7,993 | ) | | (3,768 | ) |
Other items, net | | | | 681 | | | 737 | | | 228 | |
Valuation allowance | | | | 18,328 | | | 4,992 | | | 2,596 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | | $ | 39,250 | | $ | 9,350 | | $ | (17,475 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
The components of the net deferred tax asset are as follows:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
|
---|
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | | | |
Reserves not currently deductible | | | $ | 29,415 | | $ | 24,535 | |
Employee benefit related items | | | | 130,141 | | | 166,364 | |
Tax credit carryforwards | | | | 21,437 | | | 20,704 | |
Tax loss carryforwards | | | | 430,924 | | | 380,010 | |
Inventories | | | | 20,340 | | | 14,499 | |
Other, net | | | | 19,635 | | | 19,684 | |
Valuation allowance | | | | (435,167 | ) | | (396,841 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Total deferred tax assets | | | | 216,725 | | | 228,955 | |
|
| |
| |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | |
Depreciation and amortization in excess | | | | | | | | |
of book expense | | | | 40,084 | | | 38,229 | |
Intangibles | | | | 11,927 | | | 25,994 | |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Total deferred tax liabilities | | | | 52,011 | | | 64,223 | |
|
| |
| |
Net deferred tax asset | | | $ | 164,714 | | $ | 164,732 | |
|
| |
| |
The net deferred tax assets are reflected in the accompanying balance sheet as follows:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
|
---|
Current deferred tax assets | | | $ | 35,290 | | $ | 28,540 | |
Long term deferred tax asset | | | | 129,424 | | | 136,192 | |
Current deferred tax liability | | | | -- | | | -- | |
Long-term deferred tax liability | | | | -- | | | -- | |
|
| |
| |
Net deferred tax asset | | | $ | 164,714 | | $ | 164,732 | |
|
| |
| |
At October 30, 2004, we had general business tax credits of $16.4 million expiring in 2008 through 2013 and alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $5.0 million which do not expire.
We have tax loss carryforwards consisting of a gross U.S. Federal operating loss carryforward of $813.7 million expiring in 2020 through 2023 with a net tax benefit of $284.8 million; tax benefits related to U.S. state operating loss carryforwards of $102.8 million with various expiration dates; and tax benefits related to foreign carryforwards of $43.4 million with various expiration dates. Included in these foreign loss carryforwards are losses with tax benefits of $41.9 that have no expiration date. For financial statement purposes, future tax benefits related to the recognition of net operating losses are subject to review as to the future realizability of these amounts. As such, valuation reserves have been established against those loss carryforward amounts for which realizability was not considered more likely than not.
Because our Plan of Reorganization provided for substantial changes in our ownership, there are annual limitations on the portions of the federal and state net operating loss carryforwards that existed at the time of our emergence from bankruptcy which we may be able to utilize on our income tax returns. This annual limitation is an amount equal to the value of our stock immediately before the ownership change adjusted to reflect the increase in value of the Company resulting from the cancellation of creditor’s claims multiplied by a federally mandated long-term tax exempt rate. The annual federal limitation originally calculated was approximately $45.7 million and could be increased by certain transactions which result in recognition of “built-in” gains – unrecognized gains existing as of the date we emerged from bankruptcy. During Fiscal 2003, the Internal Revenue Service issue Notice 2003-65 which allows for additional modifications to the annual limitation as originally determined. Based upon the guidance from this ruling and applying it to our facts at the time of emergence from bankruptcy, the Company has recomputed the amount of U.S. net operating loss that it is entitled to utilize since Fiscal 2001. As a result of this recalculation, the total amount of the U.S. Federal net operating loss carryforward not subject to the annual limitation was approximately $555.6 million at October 30, 2004. The state limitations vary by taxing jurisdictions.
Annually, we reassess our position on the creation and continuation of valuation reserves and adjust the reserve balances where we feel it appropriate based upon past, current, and projected profitability in the various geographical areas in which we conduct business and available tax strategies. Additionally, the U.S. carryforwards were reduced upon emergence from bankruptcy due to the rules and regulations in the Internal Revenue Code related to cancellation of indebtedness income that is excluded from taxable income. These adjustments are included in the net operating loss values detailed above.
At October 30, 2004, our net deferred tax asset, including loss and credit carryforwards and excluding valuation allowances, was $164.7 million. We have reviewed the realization of net operating losses, tax credits, and net other deferred tax assets in each statutory location in which we conduct our business and established valuation reserves against those net deferred tax assets whose realizability we have determined is not more likely than not. The continued need for valuation reserves will be assessed at least annually to determine the propriety of recognizing additional deferred tax assets. Additionally, our emergence from bankruptcy in Fiscal 2001 did not create a new tax reporting entity. Accordingly, the adjustments required to adopt fresh start accounting are not applicable for our tax reporting. Therefore, the fresh start adjustments created new deferred tax items which have been recognized concurrently with the recognition of the respective fresh start accounting adjustments since Fiscal 2001 and into Fiscal 2004.
In addition, as it relates to the valuation reserves currently recorded that arose in pre-emergence years, our reorganization has resulted in a significantly modified capital structure by which SOP 90-7 requires us to apply fresh start accounting. Under fresh start accounting, reversals of valuation reserves recorded against deferred tax assets that existed as of the emergence date will first reduce any excess reorganization value until exhausted, then other intangibles until exhausted, and thereafter are reported as additional paid in capital. Consequently, we will recognize cash tax savings in the year of asset recognition without the corresponding benefit to income tax expense. The balance of the amount of valuation reserves for which this treatment is required was $282.3 million at October 30, 2004.
Similar to the treatment of pre-emergence deferred tax valuation reserves, amounts reserved pre-emergence relating to future income tax contingencies also require special treatment under fresh start accounting. Reversals of tax contingency reserves that are no longer required due to the resolution of the underlying tax issue and were recorded at the emergence date will first reduce any excess reorganization value until exhausted, then other intangibles until exhausted, and thereafter are reported as an adjustment to income tax expense. Consistent with prior years, we have reviewed the amounts so reserved and adjusted the balances to the amounts deemed appropriate with the corresponding adjustment treated as a reduction to other intangibles.
As of October 30, 2004, U.S. income taxes, net of foreign taxes paid or payable, have not been provided on the undistributed profits of foreign subsidiaries as all undistributed profits of foreign subsidiaries are deemed to be permanently reinvested. It is not practical to determine the United States federal income tax liability, if any, which would be payable if such earnings were not permanently reinvested. Such unremitted earnings of subsidiaries which have been or are intended to be permanently reinvested were $230.8 million at October 30, 2004. The deferred income taxes provided as of November 1, 2003 relating to an anticipated dividend from a South African affiliate were reversed in the current year as the dividend was not consummated as originally planned.
On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law by President George W. Bush. Included in this Act is a provision that provides for a special one-time tax deduction of 85% of certain foreign earnings that are repatriated within a specified statutory time frame. Due to the timing of the enactment of this provision and the lack of clarification of certain key provisions, we have not had adequate time to assess the impact of this provision on our stated policy of the permanent reinvestment of foreign unremitted earnings. Based upon a preliminary assessment of our unremitted earnings, we currently estimate that the range of potential distributions could be between $0 and $44 million. We expect to analyze the applicability of and opportunities presented by this provision in the coming Fiscal Year.
Cash taxes paid for Fiscal 2002, Fiscal 2003, and Fiscal 2004 were $19.3 million, $19.1 million, and $13.7 million, respectively.
6. Accounts Receivable
Consolidated accounts receivable consisted of the following:
In thousands
| October 30, 2004
| November 1, 2003
|
---|
Trade receivables | | | $ | 235,918 | | $ | 176,428 | |
Unbilled receivables (due within one year) | | | | 29,657 | | | 25,099 | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | | (5,678 | ) | | (7,645 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| | | $ | 259,897 | | $ | 193,882 | |
|
| |
| |
We provide for bad debt on a specific account identification basis.
7. Inventories
Consolidated inventories consisted of the following:
In thousands
| October 30, 2004
| November 1, 2003
|
---|
Finished goods | | | $ | 244,244 | | $ | 226,758 | |
Work-in-process and purchased parts | | | | 164,660 | | | 131,512 | |
Raw materials | | | | 34,906 | | | 24,659 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | $ | 443,810 | | $ | 382,929 | |
|
| |
| |
8. Warranties
We provide for the estimated costs that may be incurred under product warranties to remedy deficiencies of quality or performance of our products. These product warranties extend over either a specified period of time, units of production or machine hours depending upon the product subject to the warranty. We accrue a provision for estimated future warranty costs based upon the historical relationship of warranty costs to sales. We periodically review the adequacy of the accrual for product warranties and adjust the warranty percentage and accrued warranty reserve for actual experience as necessary.
The following table reconciles the changes in the product warranty reserve:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
|
---|
Balance, beginning of period | | | $ | 30,443 | | $ | 33,904 | |
Accrual for warranty expensed during the period | | | | 20,654 | | | 18,728 | |
Settlements made during the period | | | | (19,881 | ) | | (20,130 | ) |
Change in liability for pre-existing warranties | | |
during the period, including expirations | | | | (1,826 | ) | | (3,656 | ) |
Effect of foreign currency translation | | | | 1,869 | | | 1,597 | |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Balance, end of period | | | $ | 31,259 | | $ | 30,443 | |
|
| |
| |
9. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per share computations in accordance with SFAS No. 128:
In thousands except per share amounts
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Numerator: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | $ | 55,322 | | $ | 18,516 | | $ | (28,017 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Denominator for basic earnings per share- | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares | | | | 52,123 | | | 50,242 | | | 50,169 | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options, restricted stock and | | |
Performance units | | | | 1,501 | | | 335 | | | -- | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Denominator for diluted earnings per share- | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted weighted average shares and | | |
Assumed conversions | | | | 53,624 | | | 50,577 | | | 50,169 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | $ | 1.06 | | $ | 0.37 | | $ | (0.56 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | | |
Diluted | | | $ | 1.03 | | $ | 0.37 | | $ | (0.56 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Options to purchase approximately 3,529,000 shares of common stock were outstanding at November 2, 2002 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the additional shares would reduce the (loss) per share amount from continuing operations, and therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive.
10. Pensions and Other Employee Benefits
The Company and its subsidiaries have a number of defined benefit, defined contribution and government mandated pension plans covering substantially all employees. Benefits from these plans are based on factors that include various combinations of years of service, fixed monetary amounts per year of service, employee compensation during the last years of employment and the recipient’s social security benefit. Our funding policy with respect to qualified plans is to contribute annually not less than the minimum required by applicable law and regulation nor more than the amount which can be deducted for income tax purposes. We also have an unfunded nonqualified supplemental pension plan that is based on credited years of service and compensation during the last years of employment. For our qualified and non-qualified pension plans and the post-retirement welfare plans we use the last Saturday closest to October 31 as our measurement date which coincides with our fiscal year end.
Certain plans outside the United States, which supplement or are coordinated with government plans, many of which require funding through mandatory government retirement or insurance company plans, have pension funds or balance sheet accruals which approximate the actuarially computed value of accumulated plan benefits as of October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003.
We also have a defined contribution benefit plan (401(k) plan). Substantially every U.S. employee of the Company (except any employee who is covered by a collective bargaining agreement, which does not provide for such employee’s participation in the plan) is eligible to participate in the plan. Under the terms of the plan, the Company matches 25% of participant salary reduction contributions up to the first 6% of the participant’s compensation, subject to limitations. We recognized costs for matching contributions of $1.5 million, $1.2 million, and $1.0 million, for Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002, respectively.
We recorded additional minimum pension liabilities of $22.4 million and $36.6 million in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively, to recognize the unfunded accumulated benefit obligations of certain plans. Corresponding amounts are required to be recognized as intangible assets to the extent of the unrecognized prior service cost and the unrecognized net transition obligation on an individual plan basis. Any excess of the minimum pension liability above the intangible asset is recorded as a separate component and reduction in shareholders’ equity. Intangible pension assets of $0.3 million and $2.9 million were recognized in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively. The balance of $239.0 million and $216.9 million in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively, were included in shareholders’ equity.
Total pension expense for all defined benefit plans was $22.0 million, $14.2 million and $2.7 million for Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002, respectively. Total pension expense for all defined contribution plans was $3.8 million, $2.1 million and $1.6 million for Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002, respectively.
Net periodic pension costs for U.S. plans and plans of subsidiaries outside the United States included the following components:
| U.S. Pension Plans
| Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
---|
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Components of Net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Periodic Benefit Cost (Income) | | |
Service cost | | | $ | 11,389 | | $ | 10,441 | | $ | 9,948 | | $ | 5,529 | | $ | 4,533 | | $ | 3,709 | |
Interest cost | | | | 42,990 | | | 42,825 | | | 41,647 | | | 27,140 | | | 23,496 | | | 20,596 | |
Expected return on assets | | | | (42,113 | ) | | (38,476 | ) | | (40,766 | ) | | (32,855 | ) | | (29,401 | ) | | (32,936 | ) |
Amortization of: | | |
Prior service cost | | | | 361 | | | 360 | | | 83 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | -- | |
Actuarial loss | | | | 6,676 | | | 421 | | | 21 | | | 2,840 | | | 33 | | | 6 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net periodic benefit cost (income) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
before curtailment and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
termination charges (credits) | | | | 19,303 | | | 15,571 | | | 10,933 | | | 2,655 | | | (1,338 | ) | | (8,625 | ) |
Curtailment and termination | | |
charges (credits): | | |
Special termination benefit charge | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 285 | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | |
Curtailment charge (credit) | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 87 | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total net periodic benefit cost (income) | | | $ | 19,303 | | $ | 15,571 | | $ | 11,305 | | $ | 2,655 | | $ | (1,338 | ) | $ | (8,625 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Changes in the projected benefit obligations and pension plan assets relating to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans together with a summary of the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet are set forth in the following table:
| U.S. Pension Plans
| Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
---|
In thousands
| October 30, 2004
| November 1, 2003
| October 30, 2004
| November 1, 2003
|
---|
Change in Benefit Obligations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net benefit obligations at beginning of year | | | $ | 696,354 | | $ | 619,656 | | $ | 460,091 | | $ | 390,471 | |
Service cost | | | | 11,389 | | | 10,441 | | | 5,529 | | | 4,533 | |
Interest cost | | | | 42,990 | | | 42,825 | | | 27,140 | | | 23,496 | |
Plan participants' contributions | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 1,364 | | | 1,244 | |
Plan amendments | | | | 658 | | | -- | | | -- | | | 16 | |
Actuarial loss (gain) | | | | 46,375 | | | 59,997 | | | (10,969 | ) | | 19,764 | |
Currency fluctuations | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 37,946 | | | 37,488 | |
Gross benefits paid | | | | (38,160 | ) | | (36,565 | ) | | (21,799 | ) | | (16,921 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net benefit obligations at end of year | | | $ | 759,606 | | $ | 696,354 | | $ | 499,302 | | $ | 460,091 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Change in Plan Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | | | $ | 430,834 | | $ | 348,791 | | $ | 381,128 | | $ | 324,633 | |
Actual return on plan assets | | | | 59,389 | | | 69,917 | | | 29,819 | | | 35,685 | |
Currency fluctuations | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 31,931 | | | 31,382 | |
Employer contributions | | | | 89,178 | | | 48,691 | | | 6,241 | | | 5,105 | |
Plan participants' contributions | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 1,363 | | | 1,244 | |
Gross benefits paid | | | | (38,160 | ) | | (36,565 | ) | | (21,799 | ) | | (16,921 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | | | $ | 541,241 | | $ | 430,834 | | $ | 428,683 | | $ | 381,128 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Funded Status, Realized and Unrealized Amounts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funded status at end of year | | | $ | (218,365 | ) | $ | (265,520 | ) | $ | (70,619 | ) | $ | (78,963 | ) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss | | | | 198,359 | | | 175,933 | | | 112,366 | | | 114,056 | |
Unrecognized prior service cost | | | | 4,229 | | | 3,933 | | | 16 | | | 16 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net amount recognized at end of year | | | $ | (15,777 | ) | $ | (85,654 | ) | $ | 41,763 | | $ | 35,109 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated | | |
Balance Sheet Consist of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prepaid benefit cost | | | $ | 2,864 | | $ | -- | | $ | 48,638 | | $ | 41,574 | |
Accrued benefit liability | | | | (18,641 | ) | | (85,654 | ) | | (6,875 | ) | | (6,465 | ) |
Additional minimum liability | | | | (165,425 | ) | | (144,088 | ) | | (78,050 | ) | | (76,963 | ) |
Intangible asset | | | | 4,441 | | | 4,175 | | | 16 | | | 16 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | | 160,984 | | | 139,913 | | | 78,034 | | | 76,947 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net amount recognized at end of year | | | $ | (15,777 | ) | $ | (85,654 | ) | $ | 41,763 | | $ | 35,109 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
The principal assumptions used in determining the funded status and net periodic benefit cost of our pension plans are set forth in the following table. The assumptions for non-U.S. plans were developed on a basis consistent with that for U.S. plans, adjusted to reflect prevailing economic conditions and interest rate environments.
| U.S. Pension Plan
| Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
---|
| 2004
| 2003
| 2002
| 2004
| 2003
| 2002
|
---|
Discount rate | | | | 5 | .75% | | 6 | .25% | | 7 | .00% | | 5 | .63% | | 5 | .62% | | 5 | .88% |
Expected return on plan assets | | | | 9 | .00% | | 9 | .00% | | 9 | .50% | | 7 | .55% | | 7 | .60% | | 9 | .52% |
Rate of compensation increase | | | | 3 | .75% | | 3 | .75% | | 4 | .00% | | 4 | .08% | | 4 | .10% | | 4 | .12% |
The defined benefit plans had the following target allocation and weighted-average asset allocations as of October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003.
| Percentage of Plan Assets
|
---|
| U.S. Pension Plan
| Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
---|
Asset Category
| Target Allocation
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Target Allocation
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
|
---|
Equity Securities | | | | 70 | .00% | | 69 | .90% | | 70 | .90% | | 45 | .50% | | 51 | .50% | | 52 | .50% |
Debt Securities | | | | 30 | .00% | | 30 | .10% | | 29 | .10% | | 44 | .50% | | 39 | .40% | | 47 | .50% |
Real Estate | | | | 0 | .00% | | 0 | .00% | | 0 | .00% | | 0 | .00% | | 0 | .00% | | 0 | .00% |
Other | | | | 0 | .00% | | 0 | .00% | | 0 | .00% | | 10 | .00% | | 9 | .10% | | 0 | .00% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | | | 100 | .00% | | 100 | .00% | | 100 | .00% | | 100 | .00% | | 100 | .00% | | 100 | .00% |
The plan’s assets are invested to maximize funded ratios over the long-term while managing the risk that funded ratios fall meaningfully below 100%. This objective to maximize the plan’s funded ratio is based on a long-term investment horizon, so that interim fluctuations should be viewed with appropriate perspective.
The desired investment return objective is a long-term average annual real rate of return on assets that is approximately 6.5% greater than the assumed inflation rate. The target rate of return is based upon an analysis of historical returns supplemented with an economic and structural review for each asset class. There is no assurance that these objectives will be met.
The following pension benefit payments (which include expected future service) are expected to be paid in each of the following fiscal years.
In thousands
| U.S. Pension Plans
| Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
---|
2005 | | | $ | 38,233 | | $ | 21,211 | |
2006 | | | | 39,158 | | | 21,441 | |
2007 | | | | 40,060 | | | 22,400 | |
2008 | | | | 41,277 | | | 24,431 | |
2009 | | | | 42,744 | | | 24,113 | |
2010-2014 | | | | 240,343 | | | 135,504 | |
The projected benefit obligations, accumulated benefits obligations and fair value of plan assets for underfunded and overfunded plans have been combined for disclosure purposes. The projected benefit obligations, accumulated benefit obligations, and fair value of assets for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets and pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets are as follows:
| Projected Benefit Obligation Exceeds the Fair Value of Plan's Assets
| Accumulated Benefit Obligation Exceeds the Fair Value of Plan's Assets
|
---|
In thousands
| 2004
| 2003
| 2004
| 2003
|
---|
Projected Benefit Obligation | | | $ | 1,220,280 | | $ | 1,156,445 | | $ | 1,220,280 | | $ | 1,118,937 | |
Accumulated Benefit Obligation | | | | 1,152,853 | | | 1,085,290 | | | 1,152,853 | | | 1,054,221 | |
Fair Value of Plan Assets | | | | 929,764 | | | 811,962 | | | 929,764 | | | 777,287 | |
For the fiscal year ending October 29, 2005, we expect to voluntarily contribute between $20 million and $40 million to our U.S. employee pension plan.
11. Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
In 1993, our Board of Directors approved a general approach that culminated in the elimination of all Company contributions towards postretirement health care benefits. Increases in costs paid by us were capped for certain plans beginning in 1994 extending through 1998 and Company contributions were eliminated as of January 11, 1999 for most employee groups, excluding Joy, certain early retirees and specific discontinued operation groups. For Joy, based upon existing plan terms, future eligible retirees will participate in a premium cost-sharing arrangement which is based upon age as of March 1, 1993 and position at the time of retirement. Active employees under age 45 as of March 1, 1993 and any new hires after April 1, 1993 will be required to pay 100% of the applicable premium.
The components of the net periodic benefit cost associated with our postretirement benefit plans (other than pensions), all of which relate to operations in the U.S., are as follows:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | | $ | 149 | | $ | 142 | | $ | 122 | |
Interest cost | | | | 3,143 | | | 3,747 | | | 3,476 | |
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss | | | | 193 | | | 258 | | | (25 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total net periodic benefit cost | | |
of continuing operations | | | $ | 3,485 | | $ | 4,147 | | $ | 3,573 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
The following table sets forth the benefit obligations, plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheet:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
|
---|
Change in Benefit Obligations | | | | | | | | |
Net benefit obligations at beginning of year | | | $ | 57,880 | | $ | 56,865 | |
Service cost | | | | 149 | | | 142 | |
Interest cost | | | | 3,144 | | | 3,747 | |
Actuarial (gain) loss | | | | (5,133 | ) | | 1,034 | |
Gross benefits paid | | | | (4,020 | ) | | (3,908 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Net benefit obligations at end of year | | | $ | 52,020 | | $ | 57,880 | |
|
| |
| |
Change in Plan Assets | | |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | | | $ | -- | | $ | -- | |
Employer contributions | | | | 4,020 | | | 3,908 | |
Gross benefits paid | | | | (4,020 | ) | | (3,908 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | | | $ | -- | | $ | -- | |
|
| |
| |
Funded Status, Recognized and Unrecognized Amounts | | | | | | | | |
Funded status at end of year | | | $ | (52,020 | ) | $ | (57,880 | ) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss | | | | 3,655 | | | 8,983 | |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Net amount recognized at end of year | | | $ | (48,365 | ) | $ | (48,897 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated | | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheet consist of: | | |
Accrued benefit liability | | | | | | | | |
- short-term portion | | | $ | (4,020 | ) | $ | (3,905 | ) |
- long-term portion | | | | (44,345 | ) | | (44,992 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Net amount recognized at end of year | | | $ | (48,365 | ) | $ | (48,897 | ) |
|
| |
| |
For postretirement benefit obligation measurement purposes, the weighted average discount rate is 5.75 % and 6.25% for Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively, and the assumed annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits is 10% and 11% for Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively. These rates are assumed to decrease 1% per year to an ultimate 5% by Fiscal 2009, and remain at that level thereafter. The health care cost trend rate assumption has an effect on the amounts reported. A one percentage point increase in the assumed health care cost trend rates each year would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of October 30, 2004 by $3.7 million. The service cost and interest cost components of the net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the year would increase by $0.3 million. A one percentage point decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rates each year would decrease the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of October 30, 2004 by $3.2 million. The service cost and interest cost components of the net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the year would decrease by $0.2 million. Postretirement life insurance benefits have a minimal effect on the total benefit obligation.
On December 8, 2003, the President of the United States signed the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. This Act introduced a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D) as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefits plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. We currently sponsor retiree health care plans that provide prescription drug benefits to our U.S. retirees.
We have one retiree medical plan which will qualify for the Federal subsidy. We elected to prospectively recognize the effects of the Act during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, which reduced the accumulated benefit obligation by approximately $1.0 million and is recognized as an actuarial gain in the preceding table. While the accounting treatment has been addressed, other detailed regulations necessary to implement the Act have not yet been promulgated. These regulations will need to specify how actuarial equivalency must be determined and demonstrated to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and specify the reimbursement mechanism for the subsidy. These final regulations may change the estimated impact of the Act.
12. Shareholders’ Equity and Stock Options
We have 150,000,000 shares of authorized common stock, par value $1.00 per share, 50,000,000 of which will ultimately be distributed in connection with our July 12, 2001 (“Effective Date”) emergence from bankruptcy and are deemed outstanding for accounting purposes at the Effective Date. Under our Plan of Reorganization (“POR”), the 50,000,000 shares are being distributed to holders of allowed claims in the bankruptcy case. As of October 30, 2004, total distributions under the POR were 48,766,577 shares. The remaining 1,233,423 shares are held in a disputed claims equity reserve and will be distributed in accordance with the POR as the two remaining bankruptcy related claims are finally resolved.
We are authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which 1,000,000 shares have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of $1 par value. None of the preferred shares have been issued. On July 15, 2002, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock. Each right entitles the holder to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of our Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock for $100. Under certain circumstances, if a person or group acquires 15% or more of our outstanding common stock, holders of the rights (other than the person or group triggering their exercise) will be able to purchase, in exchange for the $100 exercise price, shares of our common stock or of any company into which we are merged having a value of $200. The rights expire on August 5, 2012 unless extended by our Board of Directors. Because the rights may substantially dilute the stock ownership of a person or group attempting to take us over without the approval of our Board of Directors, our rights plan could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us (or a significant percentage of our outstanding capital stock) without first negotiating with our Board of Directors regarding such acquisition.
Our stock incentive plan authorizes the grant of up to 8,056,000 stock options, performance units, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards to officers, employees and directors. As of October 30, 2004, stock option grants aggregating approximately 5.2 million shares of common stock had been made to approximately 250 individuals. Options to purchase 15,000 shares have also been granted to each of our six outside directors. On February 25, 2003, and February 24, 2004, restricted stock unit grants of 5,582 and 2,159, respectively, were made to each of our six outside directors. These restricted stock units vest one year after the grant date and provide that a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of vested units will be delivered one year after the director’s service on the board terminates. On January 21, 2004, grants of 47,465 restricted stock units were made to certain executive officers and key employees. These restricted stock units vest over a five-year period with one-third vesting on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date and provide that a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of vested units will be delivered to the individual as the units vest. Individuals are credited with additional units to reflect cash dividends paid on the underlying common stock. In the event of a change in control, the units will be paid out in cash based on the market price of the common stock as of the date of the change in control.
The 2001, 2003 and 2004 Performance Unit Award Programs under our stock incentive plan provide long-term incentive compensation opportunities to certain senior executives. Up to approximately 706,000 shares of common stock may be earned by the senior executives under the 2001, 2003 and 2004 Performance Unit Award Programs if, at the end of a three and one quarter year award cycle, for the 2001 Performance Unit Awards, or at the end of a three year award cycle, for the 2003 and 2004 Performance Unit Awards, cumulative net cash flow, as defined in the performance award agreements, exceeds certain threshold amounts. Each performance unit represents the right to earn one share of common stock. Awards can range from 0% to 150% of the target award opportunities and may be paid out in stock, cash or a combination of stock and cash. In the event of a change in control, the performance units are paid out in cash based on the greater of actual performance or target award. The final awards for the Fiscal 2001 Performance Unit Program amounted to 363,614 units and will be paid out entirely in stock beginning in January 2005.
A summary of stock option activity under all plans is as follows:
| Number of Options
| Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share
|
---|
Outstanding at October 31, 2001 | | | | 931,750 | | $ | 13 | .76 |
Options granted | | | | 2,661,752 | | | 16 | .99 |
Options exercised | | | | -- | | | -- | |
Options forfeited or cancelled | | | | (65,000 | ) | | 16 | .16 |
|
| |
|
Outstanding at November 2, 2002 | | | | 3,528,502 | | $ | 16 | .15 |
|
| |
|
Options granted | | | | 1,092,850 | | | 10 | .59 |
Options exercised | | | | (145,172 | ) | | 14 | .15 |
Options forfeited or cancelled | | | | (147,344 | ) | | 12 | .81 |
|
| |
|
Outstanding at November 1, 2003 | | | | 4,328,836 | | $ | 14 | .88 |
|
| |
|
Options granted | | | | 505,700 | | | 26 | .51 |
Options exercised | | | | (2,866,291 | ) | | 16 | .51 |
Options forfeited or cancelled | | | | (41,625 | ) | | 15 | .55 |
|
| |
|
Outstanding at October 30, 2004 | | | | 1,926,620 | | $ | 16 | .91 |
|
| |
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at October 30, 2004:
| Outstanding
| Exercisable
|
---|
Exercise price range
| Shares
| Average life (a)
| Average exercise price
| Shares
| Average exercise price
|
---|
$ 8.02 to $ 13.76 | | | | 844,152 | | | 7 | .9 | $ | 11 | .09 | | 157,596 | | $ | 13 | .25 |
$ 13.77 to $ 17.49 | | | | 586,568 | | | 7 | .3 | | 17 | .16 | | 585,734 | | | 17 | .16 |
$ 17.50 to $ 28.08 | | | | 495,900 | | | 9 | .5 | | 26 | .51 | | -- | | | -- | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | | | 1,926,620 | | | 8 | .2 | $ | 16 | .91 | | 743,330 | | $ | 16 | .33 |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
|
(a) - Average contractual life remaining in years
At October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003, approximately 0.7 million and 2.2 million outstanding options were vested and exercisable, respectively. The weighted average exercise prices for vested and exercisable outstanding options were $16.33 and $16.23 at October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003, respectively.
13. Operating Leases
We lease certain plant, office and warehouse space as well as machinery, vehicles, data processing and other equipment. Certain of the leases have renewal options at reduced rates and provisions requiring us to pay maintenance, property taxes and insurance. Generally, all rental payments are fixed. Our assets and obligations under capital lease arrangements are not significant.
Total rental expense under operating leases, excluding maintenance, taxes and insurance, was $17.1 million, $17.5 million and $15.2 million for Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003, and Fiscal 2002, respectively.
At October 30, 2004, the future payments for all operating leases with remaining lease terms in excess of one year, and excluding maintenance, taxes and insurance were as follows:
In thousands
|
---|
2005 | | | $ | 12,270 | |
2006 | | | | 6,389 | |
2007 | | | | 4,338 | |
2008 | | | | 2,879 | |
2009 and thereafter | | | | 5,667 | |
14. Reorganization Items
Reorganization items include income, expenses and losses that were realized or incurred by the Predecessor Company as a result of its decision to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Net reorganization items for Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002 consisted of the following:
In thousands - (income) expense
| Fiscal 2004
| Fiscal 2003
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Distribution from the Beloit Liquidating Trust | | | $ | (2,856 | ) | $ | -- | | $ | -- | |
Beloit Liquidating Trust settlement | | | | (2,336 | ) | | -- | | | -- | |
Beloit U.K. claim settlement | | | | (1,774 | ) | | (3,333 | ) | | -- | |
Professional fees directly related to the reorganization | | | | 1,165 | | | 1,495 | | | 352 | |
Other - net | | | | (1,041 | ) | | (573 | ) | | (382 | ) |
Collection of Beloit note | | | | -- | | | -- | | | (7,200 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net reorganization income | | | $ | (6,842 | ) | $ | (2,411 | ) | $ | (7,230 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
15. Restructuring and Other Special Charges
Costs associated with restructuring activities other than those activities covered by SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” or that involve an entity newly acquired in a business combination, are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” Costs associated with such activities are recorded as restructuring costs in the consolidated statement of income when the liability is incurred.
During Fiscal 2003, we began implementing a manufacturing capacity rationalization at our P&H Mining Equipment Milwaukee location that reduced factory space by 350,000 square feet and resulted in a facility that is more efficient. The rationalization was completed in Fiscal 2004 at a cost of $2.0 million and is expected to result in savings greater than the cash costs to implement.
During Fiscal 2003, Joy Mining Machinery began implementing a manufacturing capacity rationalization plan for North America. Total costs for the Joy North American manufacturing capacity rationalization were $3.7 million. Included in this amount is $1.5 million for one-time termination benefits for 132 employees, $0.8 million for abandoned assets, and $1.4 million for other associated costs. Also during Fiscal 2003, Joy Mining Machinery began implementing a manufacturing capacity rationalization plan for the United Kingdom and Australia. The total costs for the United Kingdom manufacturing capacity rationalization were $1.6 million for one-time termination benefits for 26 employees. The total costs for the Australian manufacturing capacity rationalization were $0.2 million for one-time termination benefits for 27 employees. The Fiscal 2003 rationalization plan at Joy was completed in Fiscal 2004.
We realized approximately $5.5 million in cost savings in Fiscal 2004 as a result of the Fiscal 2003 rationalization plan at P&H. These savings were reflected in our cost of sales. We realized approximately $5.8 million in cost savings in Fiscal 2004 as a result of the Fiscal 2003 rationalization plan at Joy. These savings consisted of $4.7 million reflected in our cost of sales and $1.1 million reflect in our product, development, selling and administrative expenses. These savings are sustainable in future years, but will vary based upon sales volumes. If volumes increase, the savings will be higher; if the volumes decrease, the savings will be reduced.
Below is a summary of the activity related to restructuring costs recorded pursuant to SFAS No. 144 and SFAS No.146.
In thousands
| One-time Termination Benefits
| Abandoned Assets
| Other Associated Costs
| Total Charges
|
---|
Fiscal 2003 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
P&H Mining Equipment | | | $ | -- | | $ | 1,154 | | $ | 612 | | $ | 1,766 | |
Joy Mining Machinery | | | | 3,384 | | | 715 | | | 1,050 | | | 5,149 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | $ | 3,384 | | $ | 1,869 | | $ | 1,662 | | $ | 6,915 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fiscal 2004 | | |
| | | | | | | |
P&H Mining Equipment | | | $ | -- | | $ | -- | | $ | 253 | | $ | 253 | |
Joy Mining Machinery | | | | 200 | | | -- | | | 172 | | | 372 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
| | | $ | 200 | | $ | -- | | $ | 425 | | $ | 625 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cumulative Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
P&H Mining Equipment | | | $ | -- | | $ | 1,154 | | $ | 865 | | $ | 2,019 | |
Joy Mining Machinery | | | | 3,584 | | | 715 | | | 1,222 | | | 5,521 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
| | | $ | 3,584 | | $ | 1,869 | | $ | 2,087 | | $ | 7,540 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
16. Acquisitions
Effective November 4, 2002, we acquired the 25% interest in our Australian surface mining equipment subsidiary owned by Kobelco Construction Machinery Co. Limited. The purchase price of approximately $12.3 million included $11.2 million of minority interest and $1.1 million in intangible assets. As a result, our ownership of the subsidiary increased to 100% and we removed minority interest from our Consolidated Financial Statements.
17. Commitments, Contingencies and Off-Balance-Sheet Risks
We and our subsidiaries are involved in various unresolved legal matters that arise in the normal course of operations, the most prevalent of which relate to product liability (including asbestos-related liability), employment and commercial matters. Also, as a normal part of their operations, our subsidiaries undertake contractual obligations, warranties and guarantees in connection with the sale of products or services. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty and favorable or unfavorable resolutions may affect the results of operations on a quarter-to-quarter basis, we believe that the outcome of such legal and other matters will not have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
John G. Kling, purportedly on his own behalf and “in a representative capacity for the Harnischfeger Industries Employees’ Savings Plan,” (the “Plan”) filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on November 9, 2001, against certain of our present and former employees, officers and directors. We and the Plan were added as defendants in this case in early 2004. This action seeks damages in an unspecified amount based on, among other things, allegations that the members of our Pension Investment Committee, the Pension Committee of the Board of Directors, and Fidelity Management Trust Company failed to properly discharge their fiduciary obligations under ERISA with respect to the “Harnischfeger Common Stock Fund” in the Harnischfeger Industries Employees’ Savings Plan. On May 24, 2004, the court granted our motion to dismiss the Plan and the Board committee and denied our motion to dismiss us and our former directors from this action.
The General Organization for Industrial and Mining Projects (“IMC”), an agency of the government of Egypt commenced legal proceedings in Egypt in late 2002 against Joy Mining Machinery Limited (“Joy MM”), one of our subsidiaries located in the United Kingdom, to resolve certain disputes arising under an agreement entered into in 1998 between Joy MM and IMC relating to underground mining equipment for the Abu Tartur project in Egypt. IMC may also seek wrongfully to draw on approximately 9.7 million pounds sterling in bank guarantees established for the benefit of IMC in connection with the agreement. On August 6, 2004, The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes declined to accept jurisdiction of arbitration proceedings initiated by Joy MM against IMC. IMC has now commenced proceedings against Joy MM in the Cairo Arbitration Centre to recover unspecified damages for the alleged breach of contract and delay.
By notice dated May 16, 2003, Sokolovskaya Investment Company (“SIC”), a mining company in Russia, filed a request for arbitration with the ICC International Court of Arbitration against Joy MM to recover damages alleged to have arisen out of contracts entered into by Joy MM and SIC in 1995 and 1996 for the supply of underground mining equipment and related services. SIC seeks damages for loss of profit, delay, repairs, loss of use and other consequential damages of between $65 million and $82 million. An arbitration panel has been selected and a hearing before it has recently commenced.
At October 30, 2004, we were contingently liable to banks, financial institutions and others for approximately $101.9 million for outstanding letters of credit, bank guarantees and surety bonds securing performance of sales contracts and other guarantees in the ordinary course of business. Of the $101.9 million, approximately $6.2 million remains in place and is substantially attributable to remaining workers compensation obligations of Beloit Corporation. At October 30, 2004, there were $2.4 million of outstanding letters of credit or other guarantees issued by non-U.S. banks for non-U.S. subsidiaries under locally provided credit facilities.
From time to time we and our subsidiaries become involved in proceedings relating to environmental matters. We believe that the resolution of such environmental matters will not have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
We have entered into various forward foreign exchange contracts with major international financial institutions for the purpose of hedging our risk of loss associated with changes in foreign exchange rates. These contracts involve off-balance-sheet market and credit risk. As of October 30, 2004, the nominal or face value of forward foreign exchange contracts to which we are a party, in absolute U.S. dollar equivalent terms, was $173.0 million.
Forward exchange contracts are entered into to protect the value of committed future foreign currency receipts and disbursements and net investment hedges and consequently any market related loss on the forward contract would be offset by changes in the value of the hedged item. As a result, we are not exposed to net market risk associated with these instruments.
We are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to our forward exchange contracts, but we do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations. A contract is generally subject to credit risk only when it has a positive fair value and the maximum exposure is the amount of the positive fair value.
18. Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash: The carrying value approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.
Credit Facility: The carrying value of the Credit Facility approximates fair value as the facility bears a floating rate of interest expressed in relation to LIBOR. Consequently, the cost of this instrument always approximates the market cost of borrowing for an equivalent maturity and risk class.
Senior Subordinated Notes: The fair market value of the Senior Subordinated Notes is estimated based on market quotations at year-end.
Other Borrowings: The carrying value of our other borrowings approximates fair value because these instruments consist predominantly of capital leases.
Forward Exchange Contracts: The fair value of forward exchange contracts represents the estimated amounts we would receive (pay) to terminate such contracts at the reporting date based on foreign exchange market prices at that date.
The estimated fair values of our financial instruments at October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003 are as follows:
In thousands
| Carrying Value
| Fair Value
|
---|
Fiscal 2004 | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 231,706 | | $ | 231,706 | |
8.75 % Senior Subordinated Notes | | | | 200,000 | | | 225,815 | |
Other borrowings | | | | 5,979 | | | 5,979 | |
Forward exchange contracts | | | | -- | | | 1,192 | |
Fiscal 2003 | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 148,505 | | $ | 148,505 | |
8.75 % Senior Subordinated Notes | | | | 200,000 | | | 213,924 | |
Other borrowings | | | | 7,679 | | | 7,679 | |
Forward exchange contracts | | | | -- | | | (2,040 | ) |
The fair values of our forward exchange contracts at October 30, 2004 are analyzed in the following table of U.S. dollar equivalent terms:
| Maturing in 2005
|
---|
In thousands
| Buy
| Sell
|
---|
U.S. Dollar | | | | (1,147 | ) | | 2,360 | |
Australian Dollar | | | | 13 | | | 1 | |
British Pound Sterling | | | | 106 | | | (3 | ) |
South African Rand | | | | (143 | ) | | (8 | ) |
Euro | | | | 33 | | | (21 | ) |
We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage these risks, we use derivative instruments, in this case, forward exchange contracts. Derivative instruments used in hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools, involve little complexity, and are not used for trading or speculative purposes.
As part of ongoing control procedures, we monitor concentrations of credit risk associated with financial institutions with which we conduct business. Credit risk is minimal as credit exposure limits are established to avoid a concentration with any single financial institution. We also monitor the creditworthiness of our customers to which we grant credit terms in the normal course of business. Our customers are, almost exclusively, in the mining industry. Our concentration of credit risk associated with our trade receivables are considered minimal due to the broad customer base and the generally sound financial standing of our major customers. Bad debts have not been significant. We often require and receive letters of credit or bank guarantees as collateral for our credit sales, especially when the customer is located outside the United States and other developed markets.
19. Transactions With Affiliated Companies
Prior to November 4, 2002 Kobe Steel, Ltd. of Japan (“Kobe”) owned a 25% interest in our Australian surface mining equipment subsidiary. We have a technical service agreement with Kobe, expiring in 2010, under which Kobe pays technical service fees on P&H mining equipment produced and sold under the agreement. During Fiscal 2003, P&H purchased Kobe’s 25% interest in our Australian surface mining equipment subsidiary.
During Fiscal 2004 and 2003, there were no transactions with affiliated companies.
Transactions with related parties during Fiscal 2002 were as follows:
In thousands
| Fiscal 2002
|
---|
Purchases | | | $ | 2,339 | |
License income | | | | 125 | |
Other income (expense) | | | | -- | |
Receivables | | | | 24 | |
Payables | | | | 245 | |
We believe that our transactions with all related parties were competitive with alternate sources of supply for each party involved.
20. Subsequent Events
On November 16, 2004, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.1125 per outstanding share of common stock. The dividend will be paid on December 15, 2004 to all stockholders of record at the close of business on December 1, 2004. This represents a 50% increase from the previous quarterly rate of $0.075 per share.
As discussed in Footnote 4, we purchased approximately $14.5 million of our 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes in an open market purchase using cash on hand in December. Since this transaction is a purchase, not redemption, the bonds remain outstanding in accordance with their terms of the Indenture.
On December 15, 2004 our Board of Directors declared a three-for-two split of our common shares, payable on January 21, 2005 to shareholders of record on January 6, 2005. In connection with the stock split, each holder of Joy Global common stock will receive one share of Joy Global common stock for each two shares of such stock owned. Cash will be distributed in lieu of fractional shares. New shares will be issued by our transfer agent, and will begin trading on the Nasdaq National Market on a split-adjusted basis on January 24, 2005.
21. Segment Information
Business Segment Information
At October 30, 2004, we had two reportable segments, underground mining machinery (Joy) and surface mining equipment (P&H). Joy is a major manufacturer of underground mining equipment for the extraction of coal and other bedded minerals and offers comprehensive service locations near major mining regions worldwide. P&H is a major producer of surface mining equipment for the extraction of ores and minerals and provides extensive operational support for many types of equipment used in surface mining. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 3 —Significant Accounting Policies. Operating income (loss) of segments does not include interest income or expense and provision (benefit) for income taxes. Identifiable assets are those used in our operations in each segment. Corporate assets consist primarily of deferred financing costs, cash and cash equivalents and deferred income taxes.
In thousands
| Net Sales
| Operating Income (Loss)
| Depreciation and Amortization
| Capital Expenditures
| Total Assets
|
---|
Fiscal 2004 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underground Mining | | | $ | 820,121 | | $ | 91,376 | | $ | 28,012 | | $ | 11,914 | | $ | 641,053 | |
Surface Mining | | | | 612,046 | | | 53,189 | | | 18,010 | | | 9,221 | | | 430,816 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operations | | | | 1,432,167 | | | 144,565 | | | 46,022 | | | 21,135 | | | 1,071,869 | |
Corporate | | | | -- | | | (36,884 | ) | | 3,345 | | | -- | | | 368,490 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Total | | | $ | 1,432,167 | | $ | 107,681 | | $ | 49,367 | | $ | 21,135 | | $ | 1,440,359 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fiscal 2003 | | |
Underground Mining | | | $ | 685,999 | | $ | 43,573 | | $ | 31,635 | | $ | 18,622 | | $ | 679,919 | |
Surface Mining | | | | 529,967 | | | 27,572 | | | 20,743 | | | 8,890 | | | 465,408 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operations | | | | 1,215,966 | | | 71,145 | | | 52,378 | | | 27,512 | | | 1,145,327 | |
Corporate | | | | -- | | | (23,463 | ) | | 3,710 | | | -- | | | 141,402 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Total | | | $ | 1,215,966 | | $ | 47,682 | | $ | 56,088 | | $ | 27,512 | | $ | 1,286,729 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fiscal 2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underground Mining | | | $ | 745,714 | | $ | 19,516 | | $ | 36,203 | | $ | 11,651 | | $ | 634,139 | |
Surface Mining | | | | 405,133 | | | (18,157 | ) | | 22,734 | | | 7,436 | | | 484,595 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operations | | | | 1,150,847 | | | 1,359 | | | 58,937 | | | 19,087 | | | 1,118,734 | |
Corporate | | | | -- | | | (16,502 | ) | | 3,715 | | | -- | | | 138,605 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Total | | | $ | 1,150,847 | | $ | (15,143 | ) | $ | 62,652 | | $ | 19,087 | | $ | 1,257,339 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Geographical Segment Information
In thousands
| Total Sales
| Interarea Sales
| Sales to Unaffiliated Customers
| Operating Income (Loss)
| Long- Lived Assets
|
---|
Fiscal 2004 | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ 863,642 | | $ (191,415 | ) | $ 672,227 | | $ 88,076 | | $140,089 | |
Europe | | 270,887 | | (60,102 | ) | 210,785 | | 24,870 | | 75,123 | |
Australia | | 223,244 | | (7,434 | ) | 215,810 | | 12,574 | | 25,455 | |
Other Foreign | | 337,580 | | (4,235 | ) | 333,345 | | 50,493 | | 23,593 | |
Interarea Eliminations | | (263,186 | ) | 263,186 | | — | | (31,448 | ) | — | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | |
| | $ 1,432,167 | | $ — | | $1,432,167 | | $ 144,565 | | $264,260 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fiscal 2003 | |
United States | | $ 761,267 | | $ (178,916 | ) | $ 582,351 | | $ 32,315 | | $159,808 | |
Europe | | 218,632 | | (71,784 | ) | 146,848 | | 27,227 | | 68,582 | |
Australia | | 213,773 | | (11,643 | ) | 202,130 | | 8,902 | | 23,849 | |
Other Foreign | | 286,139 | | (1,502 | ) | 284,637 | | 35,534 | | 27,115 | |
Interarea Eliminations | | (263,845 | ) | 263,845 | | — | | (32,833 | ) | — | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | |
| | $ 1,215,966 | | $ — | | $1,215,966 | | $ 71,145 | | $279,354 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fiscal 2002 | |
United States | | $ 799,560 | | $ (161,172 | ) | $ 638,388 | | $(24,541 | ) | $172,791 | |
Europe | | 258,821 | | (86,367 | ) | 172,454 | | 33,729 | | 56,170 | |
Other Foreign | | 352,163 | | (12,158 | ) | 340,005 | | 21,563 | | 50,455 | |
Interarea Eliminations | | (259,697 | ) | 259,697 | | — | | (29,392 | ) | — | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | |
| | $ 1,150,847 | | $ — | | $1,150,847 | | $ 1,359 | | $279,416 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
22. Subsidiary Guarantors
The following tables present condensed consolidated financial information for Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002, the 2001 Four Months and the 2001 Eight Months for: (a) the Company; (b) on a combined basis, the guarantors of the Credit Agreement and Senior Subordinated Notes, which include substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries (“Subsidiary Guarantors”); and (c) on a combined basis, the non-guarantors, which include all of our foreign subsidiaries (“Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”). Separate financial statements of the Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented because the guarantors are unconditionally, jointly, and severally liable under the guarantees, and we believe such separate statements or disclosures would not be useful to investors.
Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Income
Fiscal Year Ended October 30, 2004
(In thousands)
| Parent Company
| Subsidiary Guarantors
| Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
| Eliminations
| Consolidated
|
---|
Net sales | | | $ | -- | | $ | 863,642 | | $ | 831,711 | | $ | (263,186 | ) | $ | 1,432,167 | |
Cost of sales | | | | -- | | | 639,597 | | | 642,095 | | | (231,738 | ) | | 1,049,954 | |
Product development, selling | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and administrative expenses | | | | 36,076 | | | 139,369 | | | 101,967 | | | -- | | | 277,412 | |
Other (income) expense | | | | 547 | | | (3,681 | ) | | (371 | ) | | -- | | | (3,505 | ) |
Restructuring charges | | | | -- | | | 331 | | | 294 | | | -- | | | 625 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating income (loss) | | | | (36,623 | ) | | 88,026 | | | 87,726 | | | (31,448 | ) | | 107,681 | |
Intercompany items | | | | 11,783 | | | 5,662 | | | 5,182 | | | (22,627 | ) | | -- | |
Interest income (expense), net | | | | (21,998 | ) | | (323 | ) | | 2,370 | | | -- | | | (19,951 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income (loss) before reorganization items | | | | (46,838 | ) | | 93,365 | | | 95,278 | | | (54,075 | ) | | 87,730 | |
Reorganization items | | | | 6,842 | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | 6,842 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | | (39,996 | ) | | 93,365 | | | 95,278 | | | (54,075 | ) | | 94,572 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | | (6,316) | | | (12,052) | | | (20,882) | | | -- | | | (39,250) | |
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries | | | | 101,634 | | | 38,951 | | | 3,683 | | | (144,268 | ) | | -- | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income (loss) | | | $ | 55,322 | | $ | 120,264 | | $ | 78,079 | | $ | (198,343 | ) | $ | 55,322 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Income
Fiscal Year Ended November 1, 2003
(In thousands)
| Parent Company
| Subsidiary Guarantors
| Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
| Eliminations
| Consolidated
|
---|
Net sales | | | $ | -- | | $ | 761,267 | | $ | 718,544 | | $ | (263,845 | ) | $ | 1,215,966 | |
Cost of sales | | | | -- | | | 583,588 | | | 570,038 | | | (230,762 | ) | | 922,864 | |
Product development, selling | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and administrative expenses | | | | 20,319 | | | 146,211 | | | 75,227 | | | (250 | ) | | 241,507 | |
Other (income) expense | | | | -- | | | (2,945 | ) | | (57 | ) | | -- | | | (3,002 | ) |
Restructuring charges | | | | -- | | | 5,052 | | | 1,863 | | | -- | | | 6,915 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating income (loss) | | | | (20,319 | ) | | 29,361 | | | 71,473 | | | (32,833 | ) | | 47,682 | |
Intercompany items | | | | 10,403 | | | 3,772 | | | (49,255 | ) | | 35,080 | | | -- | |
Interest income (expense), net | | | | (23,973 | ) | | (948 | ) | | 2,955 | | | -- | | | (21,966 | ) |
Loss on early retirement of debt | | | | -- | | | (261 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | (261 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income (loss) before reorganization items | | | | (33,889 | ) | | 31,924 | | | 25,173 | | | 2,247 | | | 25,455 | |
Reorganization items | | | | 2,370 | | | 41 | | | -- | | | -- | | | 2,411 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | | (31,519 | ) | | 31,965 | | | 25,173 | | | 2,247 | | | 27,866 | |
(Provision) benefit for income taxes | | | | 12,401 | | | (8,177 | ) | | (13,574 | ) | | -- | | | (9,350 | ) |
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries | | | | 37,634 | | | 35,747 | | | 3,546 | | | (76,927 | ) | | -- | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income (loss) | | | $ | 18,516 | | $ | 59,535 | | $ | 15,145 | | $ | (74,680 | ) | $ | 18,516 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Income
Fiscal Year Ended November 2, 2002
(In thousands)
| Parent Company
| Subsidiary Guarantors
| Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
| Eliminations
| Consolidated
|
---|
Net sales | | | $ | -- | | $ | 799,560 | | $ | 610,984 | | $ | (259,697 | ) | $ | 1,150,847 | |
Cost of sales | | | | -- | | | 679,126 | | | 505,469 | | | (230,305 | ) | | 954,290 | |
Product development, selling | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and administrative expenses | | | | 14,717 | | | 148,417 | | | 49,687 | | | -- | | | 212,821 | |
Other (income) expense | | | | -- | | | (2,940 | ) | | 1,819 | | | -- | | | (1,121 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating income (loss) | | | | (14,717 | ) | | (25,043 | ) | | 54,009 | | | (29,392 | ) | | (15,143 | ) |
Intercompany items | | | | 15,025 | | | (7,425 | ) | | (38,500 | ) | | 30,900 | | | -- | |
Interest income (expense), net | | | | (28,115 | ) | | (948 | ) | | 1,258 | | | -- | | | (27,805 | ) |
Loss on early retirement of debt | | | | (8,100 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | (8,100 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income (loss) before reorganization items | | | | (35,907 | ) | | (33,416 | ) | | 16,767 | | | 1,508 | | | (51,048 | ) |
Reorganization items | | | | 7,575 | | | (345 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | 7,230 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and minority interest | | | | (28,332 | ) | | (33,761 | ) | | 16,767 | | | 1,508 | | | (43,818 | ) |
(Provision) benefit for income taxes | | | | 32,406 | | | (5,640 | ) | | (9,291 | ) | | -- | | | 17,475 | |
Minority interest | | | | -- | | | (1,674 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | (1,674 | ) |
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries | | | | (32,091 | ) | | 10,133 | | | 53,956 | | | (31,998 | ) | | -- | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income (loss) | | | $ | (28,017 | ) | $ | (30,942 | ) | $ | 61,432 | | $ | (30,490 | ) | $ | (28,017 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet
October 30, 2004
| Parent Company
| Subsidiary Guarantors
| Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
| Eliminations
| Consolidated
|
---|
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 180,837 | | $ | 1,422 | | $ | 49,447 | | $ | -- | | $ | 231,706 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | | -- | | | 109,036 | | | 157,680 | | | (6,819 | ) | | 259,897 | |
Inventories | | | | -- | | | 252,237 | | | 228,130 | | | (36,557 | ) | | 443,810 | |
Other current assets | | | | 36,637 | | | 3,149 | | | 16,786 | | | 67 | | | 56,639 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets | | | | 217,474 | | | 365,844 | | | 452,043 | | | (43,309 | ) | | 992,052 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | | 303 | | | 131,514 | | | 76,157 | | | -- | | | 207,974 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | | -- | | | 40,213 | | | -- | | | -- | | | 40,213 | |
Investment in affiliates | | | | 1,206,745 | | | 540,068 | | | 57,084 | | | (1,803,897 | ) | | -- | |
Intercompany accounts, net | | | | (572,278 | ) | | 638,709 | | | (113,448 | ) | | 47,017 | | | -- | |
Deferred income taxes | | | | 129,424 | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | 129,424 | |
Other non-current assets | | | | 12,233 | | | 6,410 | | | 52,053 | | | -- | | | 70,696 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | | $ | 993,901 | | $ | 1,722,758 | | $ | 523,889 | | $ | (1,800,189 | ) | $ | 1,440,359 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Short-term notes payable, including current portion | | |
of long-term debt | | | $ | -- | | $ | 48 | | $ | 3,062 | | $ | -- | | $ | 3,110 | |
Trade accounts payable | | | | 1,633 | | | 58,444 | | | 79,101 | | | -- | | | 139,178 | |
Income taxes payable | | | | (5,381 | ) | | 2,495 | | | 7,796 | | | -- | | | 4,910 | |
Advance payments and progress billings | | | | -- | | | 51,696 | | | 48,202 | | | (12,391 | ) | | 87,507 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | | 34,905 | | | 95,880 | | | 81,381 | | | (15,019 | ) | | 197,147 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | | | 31,157 | | | 208,563 | | | 219,542 | | | (27,410 | ) | | 431,852 | |
Long-term obligations | | | | 200,000 | | | 182 | | | 2,687 | | | -- | | | 202,869 | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | | 310,696 | | | 13,768 | | | 29,126 | | | -- | | | 353,590 | |
Shareholders' equity | | | | 452,048 | | | 1,500,245 | | | 272,534 | | | (1,772,779 | ) | | 452,048 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | | | $ | 993,901 | | $ | 1,722,758 | | $ | 523,889 | | $ | (1,800,189 | ) | $ | 1,440,359 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet
November 1, 2003
| Parent Company
| Subsidiary Guarantors
| Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
| Eliminations
| Consolidated
|
---|
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 57,840 | | $ | 16,222 | | $ | 74,443 | | $ | -- | | $ | 148,505 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | | -- | | | 85,849 | | | 109,312 | | | (1,279 | ) | | 193,882 | |
Inventories | | | | -- | | | 232,369 | | | 182,744 | | | (32,184 | ) | | 382,929 | |
Other current assets | | | | 29,942 | | | 8,558 | | | 13,232 | | | (481 | ) | | 51,251 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets | | | | 87,782 | | | 342,998 | | | 379,731 | | | (33,944 | ) | | 776,567 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | | 458 | | | 150,825 | | | 74,818 | | | -- | | | 226,101 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | | -- | | | 77,709 | | | -- | | | -- | | | 77,709 | |
Investment in affiliates | | | | 1,092,719 | | | 558,517 | | | 15,292 | | | (1,666,528 | ) | | -- | |
Intercompany accounts, net | | | | (415,274 | ) | | 501,066 | | | (134,915 | ) | | 49,123 | | | -- | |
Other assets | | | | 147,745 | | | 8,367 | | | 50,240 | | | -- | | | 206,352 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | | $ | 913,430 | | $ | 1,639,482 | | $ | 385,166 | | $ | (1,651,349 | ) | $ | 1,286,729 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | |
Short-term notes payable, including current portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
of long-term debt | | | $ | -- | | $ | 554 | | $ | 4,213 | | $ | -- | | $ | 4,767 | |
Trade accounts payable | | | | 269 | | | 37,094 | | | 51,773 | | | -- | | | 89,136 | |
Income taxes payable | | | | 188 | | | 2,550 | | | 23,359 | | | -- | | | 26,097 | |
Advance payments and progress billings | | | | -- | | | 14,243 | | | 24,379 | | | (1,946 | ) | | 36,676 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | | 17,889 | | | 89,309 | | | 77,888 | | | (16,056 | ) | | 169,030 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | | | 18,346 | | | 143,750 | | | 181,612 | | | (18,002 | ) | | 325,706 | |
Long-term obligations | | | | 200,000 | | | 95 | | | 2,817 | | | -- | | | 202,912 | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | | 324,811 | | | 59,320 | | | 3,707 | | | -- | | | 387,838 | |
Shareholders' equity | | | | 370,273 | | | 1,436,317 | | | 197,030 | | | (1,633,347 | ) | | 370,273 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | | | $ | 913,430 | | $ | 1,639,482 | | $ | 385,166 | | $ | (1,651,349 | ) | $ | 1,286,729 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
Fiscal Year Ended October 30, 2004
(In thousands)
| Parent Company
| Subsidiary Guarantors
| Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
| Consolidated
|
---|
Net cash provided (used) by operations | | | $ | 88,944 | | $ | (5,954 | ) | $ | (20,729 | ) | $ | 62,261 | |
Investing Activities: | | |
Property, plant and equipment acquired | | | | -- | | | (7,607 | ) | | (11,111 | ) | | (18,718 | ) |
Property, plant and equipment retired | | | | -- | | | 925 | | | 1,405 | | | 2,330 | |
Other - net | | | | 4,363 | | | (1,745 | ) | | 2,633 | | | 5,251 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities | | | | 4,363 | | | (8,427 | ) | | (7,073 | ) | | (11,137 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercise of stock options | | | | 44,716 | | | -- | | | -- | | | 44,716 | |
Dividends paid | | | | (14,026 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | (14,026 | ) |
Financing fees | | | | (1,000 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | (1,000 | ) |
Issuance (repayment) of long-term obligations | | | | -- | | | (419 | ) | | (591 | ) | | (1,010 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in short-term notes payable, net | | | | -- | | | -- | | | (1,080 | ) | | (1,080 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities | | | | 29,690 | | | (419 | ) | | (1,671 | ) | | 27,600 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and | | |
Cash Equivalents | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 4,477 | | | 4,477 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | | 122,997 | | | (14,800 | ) | | (24,996 | ) | | 83,201 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period | | | | 57,840 | | | 16,222 | | | 74,443 | | | 148,505 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | | | $ | 180,837 | | $ | 1,422 | | $ | 49,447 | | $ | 231,706 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
Fiscal Year Ended November 1, 2003
(In thousands)
| Parent Company
| Subsidiary Guarantors
| Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
| Consolidated
|
---|
Net cash provided by operations | | | $ | 18,868 | | $ | 57,136 | | $ | 29,641 | | $ | 105,645 | |
Investment Activities: | | |
Property, plant and equipment acquired | | | | -- | | | (15,581 | ) | | (11,931 | ) | | (27,512 | ) |
Proceeds from property, plant and equipment | | | | -- | | | 1,341 | | | 1,655 | | | 2,996 | |
Purchase of equity interest in subsidiary | | | | -- | | | (12,316 | ) | | -- | | | (12,316 | ) |
Other, net | | | | 3,502 | | | (1,672 | ) | | 4,455 | | | 6,285 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash provided (used) by investment activities | | | | 3,502 | | | (28,228 | ) | | (5,821 | ) | | (30,547 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Financing Activities: | | |
Exercise of stock options | | | | 1,917 | | | -- | | | -- | | | 1,917 | |
Increase (decrease) in short-term notes payable, net | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 1,512 | | | 1,512 | |
Financing fees | | | | (250 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | (250 | ) |
Issuance (repayment) of long-term obligations, net | | | | -- | | | (13,554 | ) | | 380 | | | (13,174 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities | | | | 1,667 | | | (13,554 | ) | | 1,892 | | | (9,995 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and | | |
Cash Equivalents | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 12,496 | | | 12,496 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | | 24,037 | | | 15,354 | | | 38,208 | | | 77,599 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period | | | | 33,803 | | | 868 | | | 36,235 | | | 70,906 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | | | $ | 57,840 | | $ | 16,222 | | $ | 74,443 | | $ | 148,505 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
Fiscal Year Ended November 2, 2002
(In thousands)
| Parent Company
| Subsidiary Guarantors
| Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
| Consolidated
|
---|
Net cash provided by operations | | | $ | 111,400 | | $ | 7,553 | | $ | 8,588 | | $ | 127,541 | |
Investment Activities: | | |
Property, plant and equipment acquired | | | | -- | | | (10,884 | ) | | (8,203 | ) | | (19,087 | ) |
Proceeds from property, plant and equipment | | | | 36 | | | 2,414 | | | 726 | | | 3,176 | |
Purchase of equity interest in subsidiary | | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | | | -- | |
Other, net | | | | 588 | | | 5,100 | | | (1,422 | ) | | 4,266 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash provided (used) by investment activities | | | | 624 | | | (3,370 | ) | | (8,899 | ) | | (11,645 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Financing Activities: | | |
Issuance of 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes | | | | 200,000 | | | -- | | | -- | | | 200,000 | |
Redemption of 10.75% Senior Notes | | | | (113,686 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | (113,686 | ) |
Payment of Term Note | | | | (100,000 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | (100,000 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in short-term notes payable, net | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 1,865 | | | 1,865 | |
Repayment of borrowings under Credit Agreement | | | | (63,930 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | (63,930 | ) |
Financing fees | | | | (9,136 | ) | | -- | | | -- | | | (9,136 | ) |
Issuance (repayment) of long-term obligations, net | | | | -- | | | (208 | ) | | (606 | ) | | (814 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities | | | | (86,752 | ) | | (208 | ) | | 1,259 | | | (85,701 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Equivalents | | | | -- | | | -- | | | 1,059 | | | 1,059 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | | 25,272 | | | 3,975 | | | 2,007 | | | 31,254 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period | | | | 8,531 | | | (3,107 | ) | | 34,228 | | | 39,652 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | | | $ | 33,803 | | $ | 868 | | $ | 36,235 | | $ | 70,906 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
SIGNATURES
| Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on the 29th day of March, 2005. |
JOY GLOBAL INC.
(Registrant)
John Nils Hanson
John Nils Hanson
Chairman, President
And Chief Executive Officer
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In thousands)
Classification
| Balance at Beginning of Period
| Additions Charged to Expense
| Deductions(1)
| Currency Translation Effects
| Balance at End of Year
|
---|
| | | | | |
---|
Allowance Deducted in Balance Sheet | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From Accounts Receivable: | | |
Fiscal 2004 | | | $ | 7,645 | | $ | 463 | ) | $ | (2,539 | ) | $ | 109 | | $ | 5,678 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fiscal 2003 | | | $ | 7,654 | | $ | 575 | | $ | (1,587 | ) | $ | 1,003 | | $ | 7,645 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fiscal 2002 | | | $ | 7,837 | | $ | 611 | | $ | (976 | ) | $ | 182 | | $ | 7,654 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| __________________________________________________________ (1) Represents write-off of bad debts, net of recoveries. |
| Allowance Deducted in Balance Sheet from Deferred Tax Assets: |
| Balance at Beginning of Year
| Additions Charged to Comprehensive Loss
| Allocated to Tax Expense
| Allocated to Intangibles
| Reclass to L-T Deferred Tax Assets
| Balance at End of Year
|
---|
For the year ended October 30, 2004 | | | $ | 396,911 | | $ | 8,387 | | $ | 18,328 | | $ | (419 | ) | $ | 12,030 | | $ | 435,237 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
For the year ended November 1, 2003 | | | $ | 399,468 | | $ | 13,461 | | $ | 4,992 | | $ | (48,271 | ) | $ | 27,261 | | $ | 396,911 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
For the year ended November 2, 2002 | | | $ | 426,956 | | $ | 48,266 | | $ | 2,596 | | $ | (25,963 | ) | $ | (52,387 | ) | $ | 399,468 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |