Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
(X) | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For the quarterly period ended April 2, 2011 | ||
| OR | ||
( ) | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 0-15386
CERNER CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 43-1196944 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification | |
| incorporation or organization) | Number) |
2800 Rockcreek Parkway
North Kansas City, Missouri 64117
(816) 201-1024
North Kansas City, Missouri 64117
(816) 201-1024
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including zip code;
registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer [X] | Accelerated filer [ ] | Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company [ ] | |||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]
There were 84,106,113 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding at April 2, 2011.
CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
I N D E X
Table of Contents
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of April 2, 2011 (unaudited) and January 1, 2011
| (In thousands, except share data) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 184,567 | $ | 214,511 | ||||
| Short-term investments | 426,314 | 356,501 | ||||||
| Receivables, net | 469,180 | 476,905 | ||||||
| Inventory | 13,657 | 11,036 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other | 101,525 | 83,272 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 8,573 | 3,836 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 1,203,816 | 1,146,061 | ||||||
| Property and equipment, net | 495,600 | 498,829 | ||||||
| Software development costs, net | 246,737 | 244,848 | ||||||
| Goodwill | 162,628 | 161,374 | ||||||
| Intangible assets, net | 39,525 | 38,468 | ||||||
| Long-term investments | 337,852 | 264,467 | ||||||
| Other assets | 75,386 | 68,743 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 2,561,544 | $ | 2,422,790 | ||||
| Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 68,159 | $ | 65,035 | ||||
| Current installments of long-term debt | 27,121 | 24,837 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue | 123,198 | 109,351 | ||||||
| Accrued payroll and tax withholdings | 76,796 | 86,921 | ||||||
| Other accrued expenses | 19,555 | 19,788 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 314,829 | 305,932 | ||||||
| Long-term debt | 74,314 | 67,923 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes and other liabilities | 134,673 | 126,215 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue | 15,042 | 17,303 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 538,858 | 517,373 | ||||||
| Shareholders’ Equity: | ||||||||
| Cerner Corporation shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
| Common stock, $.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 84,858,158 shares issued at April 2, 2011 and 84,029,285 issued at January 1, 2011 | 847 | 840 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 686,830 | 645,815 | ||||||
| Retained earnings | 1,355,391 | 1,290,835 | ||||||
| Treasury stock, 790,000 shares | (28,002 | ) | (28,002 | ) | ||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net | 7,500 | (4,191 | ) | |||||
| Total Cerner Corporation shareholders’ equity | 2,022,566 | 1,905,297 | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interest | 120 | 120 | ||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 2,022,686 | 1,905,417 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 2,561,544 | $ | 2,422,790 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
1
Table of Contents
CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share data) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||
| System sales | $ | 140,379 | $ | 116,951 | ||||
| Support, maintenance and services | 340,994 | 307,045 | ||||||
| Reimbursed travel | 10,291 | 7,341 | ||||||
| Total revenues | 491,664 | 431,337 | ||||||
| Costs and expenses: | ||||||||
| Cost of system sales | 58,099 | 44,828 | ||||||
| Cost of support, maintenance and services | 22,290 | 15,915 | ||||||
| Cost of reimbursed travel | 10,291 | 7,341 | ||||||
| Sales and client service | 201,348 | 187,593 | ||||||
| Software development (includes amortization of $19,058 and $15,838, respectively) | 71,144 | 66,779 | ||||||
| General and administrative | 34,793 | 33,225 | ||||||
| Total costs and expenses | 397,965 | 355,681 | ||||||
| Operating earnings | 93,699 | 75,656 | ||||||
| Other income (expense): | ||||||||
| Interest income (expense), net | 1,976 | 1,783 | ||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 35 | (76 | ) | |||||
| Total other income (expense), net | 2,011 | 1,707 | ||||||
| Earnings before income taxes | 95,710 | 77,363 | ||||||
| Income taxes | (31,154 | ) | (27,077 | ) | ||||
| Net earnings | $ | 64,556 | $ | 50,286 | ||||
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.77 | $ | 0.61 | ||||
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.59 | ||||
| Basic weighted average shares outstanding | 83,555 | 81,957 | ||||||
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 86,326 | 85,105 | ||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
2
Table of Contents
CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 64,556 | $ | 50,286 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 50,140 | 44,804 | ||||||
| Share-based compensation expense | 6,944 | 5,150 | ||||||
| Provision for deferred income taxes | 5,999 | 3,743 | ||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities (net of businesses acquired): | ||||||||
| Receivables, net | 6,918 | 34,045 | ||||||
| Inventory | (2,609 | ) | 1,115 | |||||
| Prepaid expenses and other | (13,449 | ) | 17,114 | |||||
| Accounts payable | - | 5,813 | ||||||
| Accrued income taxes | 2,509 | (32,667 | ) | |||||
| Deferred revenue | 11,050 | (3,182 | ) | |||||
| Other accrued liabilities | (5,557 | ) | (20,718 | ) | ||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 126,501 | 105,503 | ||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Capital purchases | (21,372 | ) | (32,108 | ) | ||||
| Capitalized software development costs | (20,466 | ) | (20,516 | ) | ||||
| Purchases of investments | (348,566 | ) | (110,522 | ) | ||||
| Maturities of investments | 203,367 | 57,391 | ||||||
| Purchase of other intangibles | (3,228 | ) | (2,233 | ) | ||||
| Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | - | (14,486 | ) | |||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (190,265 | ) | (122,474 | ) | ||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of future receivables | - | 1,516 | ||||||
| Repayment of long-term debt | (114 | ) | (219 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from excess tax benefits from stock compensation | 15,698 | 7,627 | ||||||
| Proceeds from exercise of options | 16,341 | 7,616 | ||||||
| Contingent consideration payments for acquisition of businesses | (780 | ) | - | |||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 31,145 | 16,540 | ||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | 2,675 | (1,085 | ) | |||||
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (29,944 | ) | (1,516 | ) | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 214,511 | 241,723 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 184,567 | $ | 240,207 | ||||
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information | ||||||||
| Cash paid during the year for: | ||||||||
| Interest | $ | 348 | $ | 72 | ||||
| Income taxes, net of refund | 15,046 | 56,313 | ||||||
| Summary of acquisition transactions: | ||||||||
| Fair value of tangible assets acquired | $ | - | $ | 2,126 | ||||
| Fair value of intangible assets acquired | - | 5,076 | ||||||
| Fair value of goodwill acquired | - | 11,290 | ||||||
| Fair value of current liabilities assumed | - | (1,057 | ) | |||||
| Fair value of contingent liability payable | - | (1,725 | ) | |||||
| Cash paid for acquisition | - | 15,710 | ||||||
| Cash acquired | - | (1,224 | ) | |||||
| Net cash used | $ | - | $ | 14,486 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
3
Table of Contents
CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(1) Interim Statement Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our latest annual report on Form 10-K.
In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Our interim results as presented in this Form 10-Q are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire year.
The condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). These principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Our first fiscal quarter ends on the Saturday closest to March 31. The 2011 and 2010 first quarters ended on April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively. All references to years in these notes to condensed consolidated financial statements represent the three months ended of the first fiscal quarter, respectively, unless otherwise noted.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2009-13. In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2009-13 —Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 requires a vendor to allocate revenue to each unit of accounting in many arrangements involving multiple deliverables based on the relative selling price of each deliverable. It also changes the level of evidence of standalone selling price required to separate deliverables by allowing a vendor to make its best estimate of the standalone selling price of deliverables when more objective evidence of selling price is not available.
We adopted ASU 2009-13 for all new and materially modified arrangements on a prospective basis beginning January 2, 2011. We have reviewed the primary accounting literature related to the elements that typically get bundled into our arrangements and determined that the majority of the elements fall in to two different accounting units. One unit is comprised of software and software-related elements which include our license software, license software support, application services provider, subscriptions, professional services, remote hosting, sublicensed software and sublicensed software support. The second unit of accounting is non-software elements, which include hardware and hardware maintenance.
The majority of our multiple-element arrangements do not contain both software and non-software deliverables such as hardware and thus are not impacted by the new guidance. For our arrangements that are impacted by ASU 2009-13, we determined fair value based upon VSOE, if it existed, and in instances where VSOE did not exist (primarily for our License Software), we determined fair value based upon the estimated selling price concept. The application of this concept relied primarily on historical pricing and management guidance for similarly sized arrangements.
The adoption of ASU 2009-13 did not result in a material change in the timing of revenue recognition due to the small number of arrangements executed with both software and non-software deliverables and the existence of VSOE for most of our business models.
ASU 2009-14.In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-14 —Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements (ASU 2009-14). Under ASU 2009-14, tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the tangible product’s essential functionality are no longer within the scope of the software revenue guidance in ASC 985-605. We adopted the amendment provisions of ASU 2009-14 on January 2, 2011; the adoption of this standard did not have material impact on the timing of revenue recognition.
4
Table of Contents
(2) Fair Value Measurements
We determine fair value measurements used in our condensed consolidated financial statements based upon the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
| • | Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access. | ||
| • | Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. | ||
| • | Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
The following table details our financial assets measured at fair value within the fair value hierarchy:
| (In thousands) | April 2, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | Fair Value Measurements Using | Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description | Classification | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Money market funds | Cash equivalents | $ | 15,024 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 44,237 | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||
| Time deposits | Short-term investments | - | 48,059 | - | - | 41,764 | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial paper | Short-term investments | - | 59,300 | - | - | 44,500 | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Government and corporate bonds | Short-term investments | - | 318,955 | - | - | 251,787 | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Auction rate securities | Short-term investments | - | - | - | - | 18,450 | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Government and corporate bonds | Long-term investments | - | 337,852 | - | - | 264,467 | - | |||||||||||||||||||
We classify our long-term, fixed rate debt as a long-term liability on the balance sheet and estimate the fair value using a Level 3 discounted cash flow analysis based on our current borrowing rates for debt with similar maturities. The fair value of our long-term debt, including current maturities, was approximately $101.7 million at April 2, 2011.
(3) Receivables
Receivables consist primarily of accounts receivable and contracts receivable. Accounts receivable represent recorded revenues that have been billed. Contracts receivable represent recorded revenues that are billable by us at future dates under the terms of a contract with a client. Billings and other consideration received on contracts in excess of related revenues recognized are recorded as deferred revenue. Substantially all receivables are derived from sales and related support and maintenance and professional services of our clinical, administrative and financial information systems and solutions to healthcare providers located throughout the United States and in certain non-U.S. countries.
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our clients and generally do not require collateral from our clients. We provide an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts based on specific identification, historical experience and our judgment. Provisions for losses on uncollectible accounts for the first three months of 2011 and 2010 totaled $2.3 million and $5.6 million, respectively. A summary of net receivables is as follows:
5
Table of Contents
| (In thousands) | April 2, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | ||||||
| Gross accounts receivable | $ | 353,761 | $ | 352,554 | ||||
| Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts | 17,353 | 15,550 | ||||||
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance | 336,408 | 337,004 | ||||||
| Contracts receivable | 132,772 | 139,901 | ||||||
| Total receivables, net | $ | 469,180 | $ | 476,905 | ||||
During the second quarter of 2008, Fujitsu Services Limited’s (Fujitsu) contract as the prime contractor in the National Health Service (NHS) initiative to automate clinical processes and digitize medical records in the Southern region of England was terminated by the NHS. This had the effect of automatically terminating our subcontract for the project. We are in dispute with Fujitsu regarding Fujitsu’s obligation to pay the amounts comprised of accounts receivable and contracts receivable related to that subcontract, and we are working with Fujitsu to resolve these issues based on processes provided for in the contract. Part of that process requires resolution of disputes between Fujitsu and the NHS regarding the contract termination. As of April 2, 2011, it remains unlikely that the matter will be resolved in the next 12 months. Therefore these receivables have been classified as long-term and represent the significant majority of other long-term assets as of the first quarter ended April 2, 2011. While the ultimate collectability of the receivables pursuant to this process is uncertain, we believe that we have valid and equitable grounds for recovery of such amounts and that collection of recorded amounts is probable.
During the first three months of 2011 and 2010, we received total client cash collections of $531.1 million and $483.7 million, respectively, of which $16.0 million and $18.7 million were received from third party arrangements with non-recourse payment assignments.
(4) Income Taxes
We determine the tax provision for interim periods using an estimate of our annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items, if any, that are taken into account in the relevant period. Each quarter we update our estimate of the annual effective tax rate, and if our estimated tax rate changes we make a cumulative adjustment. We classify interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Our effective tax rate was 32.6% and 35.0% for the first three months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to the research and development tax credit being in effect for the first three months of 2011 while it was not effective for the first quarter of 2010 and a favorable foreign tax audit settlement during the current period.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Internal Revenue Service commenced its examination of the 2008 and 2009 income tax returns. We do not believe this examination will have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Other than the aforementioned matter, we do not anticipate any settlements of the remaining unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
(5) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in our earnings. A reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations are as follows:
6
Table of Contents
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings | Shares | Per-Share | Earnings | Shares | Per-Share | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | (Numerator) | (Denominator) | Amount | (Numerator) | (Denominator) | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income available to common shareholders | $ | 64,556 | 83,555 | $ | 0.77 | $ | 50,286 | 81,957 | $ | 0.61 | ||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock options | - | 2,771 | - | 3,148 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income available to common shareholders including assumed conversions | $ | 64,556 | 86,326 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 50,286 | 85,105 | $ | 0.59 | ||||||||||||||
Options to purchase 0.8 million and 0.2 million shares of common stock at per share prices ranging from $76.12 to $106.01 and $58.21 to $85.51 were outstanding at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options were anti-dilutive. In addition, the computation of diluted earnings per share does not include 145,500 performance based non-vested stock awards, as all necessary conditions of such contingently issuable shares have not been satisfied.
(6) Share-Based Compensation
On March 11, 2011 approximately 104,000 stock options were granted to executive officers and other executive level associates under our Long-Term Incentive Plan F. These awards will vest 40% on March 11, 2013, and 20% will vest on March 11, 2014, 2015 and 2016. The fair value of each of these awards was $51.44 per award. Total compensation expense related to these awards is $5.3 million, which is expected to be recognized over a period of 5 years.
On March 11, 2011 we granted approximately 60,000 shares of performance-based non-vested restricted stock to certain executive officers, pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan F. The fair value of each of these awards was $103.20 based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. These awards are scheduled to vest 10% on June 1, 2012 and 2013 and the remaining 80% on June 1, 2014, contingent upon the objective performance metric of a relative adjusted GAAP earnings growth percentage over 2010 for each respective year. These performance awards are also subject to reduction based on an annual subjective performance assessment related to individual performance and performance goal attainment, as defined in the award agreements. The amount of compensation expense recognized is based on management’s estimate of the most likely outcome and will be reassessed at each reporting date through the final vesting date, which may result in adjustments to compensation cost. Based on a current period vesting probability assessment, total compensation cost related to these awards is $6.2 million and is expected to be recognized over a period of 3 years.
In April 2011, we announced that an executive officer will resign effective May 13, 2011. Upon the effective date of this resignation, approximately 33% of the above performance-based awards will be forfeited. Subsequent to this forfeiture, we would expect compensation cost related to the remaining performance-based awards to be approximately $4.1 million.
The following table presents the total compensation expense recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations with respect to stock options, non-vested restricted shares and Associate Stock Purchase Plan shares:
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Stock option and non-vested restricted share compensation expense | $ | 6,944 | $ | 5,150 | ||||
| Associate stock purchase plan expense | 482 | 401 | ||||||
| Amounts capitalized in software development costs, net of amortization | (65 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||
| Amounts charged against earnings, before income tax benefit | $ | 7,361 | $ | 5,507 | ||||
| Amount of related income tax benefit recognized in earnings | $ | 2,805 | $ | 2,051 | ||||
As of April 2, 2011, there was $53.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options granted under all plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.97 years.
7
Table of Contents
(7) Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income, which includes net earnings, foreign currency translation adjustments and gains and losses from a hedge of our net investment in the United Kingdom (U.K.), amounted to $76.2 million and $43.6 million for the three months ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively. None of the items within comprehensive income, including net earnings, relate to non-controlling interests.
As of April 2, 2011, we designated all of our Great Britain Pound (GBP) denominated long-term debt as a net investment hedge of our U.K. operations. The objective of the hedge is to reduce our foreign currency exposure in the U.K. subsidiary investment. Changes in the exchange rate between the United States Dollar (USD) and GBP, related to the notional amount of the hedge, are recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), to the extent the hedge is effective.
The following tables represent the fair value of the net investment hedge included within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and the related unrealized gain or loss, net of related income tax effects:
| (In thousands) | Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | Fair Value | For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| Derivatives designated | Classification | April 2, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| Net investment hedge | Short-term liabilities | $ | 14,959 | $ | 14,488 | $ | 292 | $ | 562 | |||||||||
| Net investment hedge | Long-term liabilities | 59,837 | 57,950 | 1,168 | 2,808 | |||||||||||||
| Total net investment hedge | $ | 74,796 | $ | 72,438 | $ | 1,460 | $ | 3,370 | ||||||||||
We recognize foreign currency transaction gains and losses within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of general and administrative expenses. We realized a foreign currency loss of $0.1 million and a loss of $0.2 million during the three months ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively.
(8) Contingencies
The terms of our software license agreements with our clients generally provide for a limited indemnification of such intellectual property against losses, expenses and liabilities arising from third party claims based on alleged infringement by our solutions of an intellectual property right of such third party. The terms of such indemnification often limit the scope of and remedies for such indemnification obligations and generally include a right to replace or modify an infringing solution. To date, we have not had to reimburse any of our clients for any losses related to these indemnification provisions pertaining to third party intellectual property infringement claims. For several reasons, including the lack of prior indemnification claims and the lack of a monetary liability limit for certain infringement cases under the terms of the corresponding agreements with our clients, we cannot determine the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, related to such indemnification provisions.
From time to time we are involved in routine litigation incidental to the conduct of our business, including for example, employment disputes and litigation alleging solution defects, intellectual property infringement, violations of law and breaches of contract and warranties. We believe that no such routine litigation currently pending against us, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
(9) Segment Reporting
We have two operating segments, Domestic and Global. Revenues are derived primarily from the sale of clinical, financial and administrative information systems and solutions. The cost of revenues includes the cost of third party consulting services, computer hardware and sublicensed software purchased from computer and software manufacturers for delivery to clients. It also includes the cost of hardware maintenance and sublicensed software support subcontracted to the manufacturers. Operating expenses incurred by the geographic business segments consist of sales and client service expenses including salaries of sales and client service personnel, communications expenses and unreimbursed travel expenses. Performance of the segments is assessed at the operating earnings level and, therefore, the segment operations have been presented as such. “Other” includes revenues not generated by the operating segments and expenses that have not been allocated to the operating segments, such as software development, marketing, general and administrative, share-based compensation expense and depreciation. We
8
Table of Contents
manage our operating segments to the operating earnings level. Items such as interest, income taxes, capital expenditures and total assets are managed at the consolidated level and thus are not included in our operating segment disclosures.
Accounting policies for each of the reportable segments are the same as those used on a consolidated basis. The following table presents a summary of the operating information for the three months ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010.
| Operating Segments | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | Domestic | Global | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
| Three months ended 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 420,990 | $ | 70,674 | $ | — | $ | 491,664 | ||||||||
| Cost of revenues | 77,925 | 12,755 | — | 90,680 | ||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | 105,349 | 29,099 | 172,837 | 307,285 | ||||||||||||
| Total costs and expenses | 183,274 | 41,854 | 172,837 | 397,965 | ||||||||||||
| Operating earnings (loss) | $ | 237,716 | $ | 28,820 | $ | (172,837 | ) | $ | 93,699 | |||||||
| Operating Segments | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | Domestic | Global | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
| Three months ended 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 355,315 | $ | 76,022 | $ | — | $ | 431,337 | ||||||||
| Cost of revenues | 61,241 | 6,843 | — | 68,084 | ||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | 104,723 | 29,713 | 153,161 | 287,597 | ||||||||||||
| Total costs and expenses | 165,964 | 36,556 | 153,161 | 355,681 | ||||||||||||
| Operating earnings (loss) | $ | 189,351 | $ | 39,466 | $ | (153,161 | ) | $ | 75,656 | |||||||
9
Table of Contents
| Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is intended to help the reader understand the results of operations and financial condition of Cerner Corporation (Cerner, the Company, we, us or our). This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements (Notes) found above.
Our first fiscal quarter ends on the Saturday closest to March 31. The 2011 and 2010 first quarters ended on April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively. All references to years in the MD&A represent the respective three months ended of the first fiscal quarters, unless otherwise noted.
Except for the historical information and discussions contained herein, statements contained in this Form 10-Q may constitute “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act). Forward-looking statements can often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “could,” “should,” “will,” “intended,” “continue,” “believe,” “may,” “expect,” “hope,” “anticipate,” “goal,” “forecast,” “plan,” “guidance” or “estimate” or the negative of these words, variations thereof or similar expressions. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, including: the possibility of product-related liabilities; potential claims for system errors and warranties; the possibility of interruption at our data centers or client support facilities; our proprietary technology may be subject to claims for infringement or misappropriation of intellectual property rights of others, or may be infringed or misappropriated by others; risks associated with our non-U.S. operations; risks associated with our ability to effectively hedge exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; the potential for tax legislation initiatives that could adversely affect our tax position and/or challenges to our tax positions in the United States and non-U.S. countries; risks associated with our recruitment and retention of key personnel; risks related to our reliance on third party suppliers; risks inherent with business acquisitions; the potential for losses resulting from asset impairment charges; risks associated with the ongoing adverse financial market environment and uncertainty in global economic conditions; changing political, economic and regulatory influences; government regulation; significant competition and market changes; variations in our quarterly operating results; potential inconsistencies in our sales forecasts compared to actual sales; volatility in the trading price of our common stock; the authority of our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock and anti-takeover provisions contained in our corporate governance documents; and, other risks, uncertainties and factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in materials incorporated therein by reference. Forward looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in future operating results, financial condition or business over time.
Management Overview
Our revenues are primarily derived by selling, implementing and supporting software solutions, clinical content, hardware, healthcare devices and services that give healthcare providers secure access to clinical, administrative and financial data in real time, allowing them to improve the quality, safety and efficiency in the delivery of healthcare. We implement the healthcare solutions as stand-alone, combined or enterprise-wide systems.Cerner Millennium®software solutions can be managed by our clients or in our data centers via a managed services model.
Our fundamental strategy centers on creating organic growth by investing in research and development (R&D) to create solutions and services for the healthcare industry. This strategy has driven strong growth over the long-term, as reflected in five- and ten-year compound annual revenue growth rates of 10% or more. This growth has also created an important strategic footprint in healthcare, withCerner®solutions licensed by approximately 9,000 facilities around the world, including more than 2,600 hospitals; 3,500 physician practices covering more than 30,000 physicians; 500 ambulatory facilities, such as laboratories, ambulatory centers, cardiac facilities, radiology clinics and surgery centers; 800 home health facilities; and 1,600 retail pharmacies. Selling additional solutions back into this client base is an important element of our future revenue growth. We are also focused on driving growth through market share expansion by strategically aligning with healthcare providers who have not yet selected a supplier and by displacing competitors in healthcare settings that are looking to replace their current healthcare information technology (HIT) partners.
10
Table of Contents
We expect to drive growth through new initiatives and services that reflect our ongoing ability to innovate and expand our reach into healthcare. Examples of these include ourCareAware®healthcare device architecture and devices,CernerHealthe™employer services,Cerner ITWorksSM services,Cerner RevWorksSM services, physician practice solutions and solutions and services for the pharmaceutical market. Finally, we are focused on selling our solutions and services outside the United States. Many non-U.S. markets have a low penetration of HIT solutions and their governing bodies are in many cases focused on HIT as part of their strategy to improve the quality and lower the cost of healthcare.
Beyond our strategy for driving revenue growth, we are also focused on earnings growth. Similar to our history of growing revenue, our net earnings have increased at more than 20% compound annual rates over the most recent five- and ten-year periods. We believe we can continue driving strong levels of earnings growth and leverage key areas to create operating margin expansion. The primary areas of opportunity for margin expansion include:
| • | becoming more efficient at implementing our software by leveraging implementation tools and methodologies we have developed that can reduce the amount of effort required to implement our software; | ||
| • | leveraging our investments in R&D by entering new markets that do not require significant incremental R&D but can contribute significantly to revenue growth; and | ||
| • | leveraging our scalable business infrastructure to reduce the rate of increase in general and administrative spending to below our revenue growth rate. |
We are also focused on increasing cash flow by growing earnings, reducing the use of working capital and controlling capital expenditures.
The Healthcare and Healthcare IT Industry
We believe there are several factors that are favorable for the HIT industry over the next decade, despite some lingering weakness in the global economy. Because HIT solutions play an important role in healthcare by improving safety, efficiency and reducing cost, they are often viewed as more strategic than other capital purchases. Most United States healthcare providers also recognize that they must invest in HIT to meet regulatory, compliance and government reimbursement requirements and incentive opportunities. In addition, with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimating United States healthcare spending at $2.6 trillion or 17.5 percent of 2010 Gross Domestic Product, politicians and policymakers agree that the growing cost of our healthcare system is unsustainable. Leaders of both political parties recognize that the intelligent use of information systems will improve health outcomes and, correspondingly, drive down costs. This belief is supported by a 2005 study by RAND Corp., which estimated that the widespread adoption of HIT in the United States could cut healthcare costs by $162 billion annually.
The broad recognition that HIT is essential to helping control healthcare costs and improving quality contributed to the inclusion of HIT incentives in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) provisions within ARRA include more than $35 billion in incentives for healthcare organizations to modernize operations through “meaningful use” of HIT. These incentives are contributing to increased demand for HIT solutions and services in the United States.
Another element in the United States marketplace is the healthcare reform legislation that passed in 2010. We believe the legislation, which promises to drive insurance coverage to an estimated 32 million additional consumers, could have many second order effects on our clients. For example, healthcare providers may face increased volumes that could create capacity constraints, and they may find it challenging to profitably provide care at the planned reimbursement rates under the expanded coverage models. We also expect additional compliance and reporting challenges for our clients in the areas of pay-for-quality, ICD-10 coding requirements, and waste, fraud and abuse measures.
We believe the above factors create strong incentives for providers to maximize efficiency and create the need for additional investments in HIT solutions and services. Cerner is well positioned to benefit from this expected increase in demand due to our large footprint in United States hospitals and physician practices and our proven ability to deliver value to our clients.
11
Table of Contents
Outside the United States, the economic downturn of the last few years has impacted and could continue to impact our results. However, we believe long-term revenue growth opportunities outside the United States remain significant because other countries are also focused on controlling healthcare spending while improving the efficiency and quality of care that is delivered, and many of these countries recognize HIT as an important piece of the solution to these issues.
In summary, while the current economic environment has impacted our business, we believe the fundamental value proposition of HIT remains strong. The HIT industry will likely benefit as healthcare providers and governments continue to recognize that these solutions and services contribute to safer, more efficient healthcare.
Results Overview
The Company delivered strong levels of bookings, revenues, earnings and cash flows in the first quarter of 2011. New business bookings revenue, which reflects the value of executed contracts for software, hardware and professional services and managed services, was $524.9 million in the first quarter of 2011, which was an increase of 30% compared to $404.9 million in the first quarter of 2010. Revenues for the first quarter of 2011 increased 14% to $491.7 million compared to $431.3 million in the year-ago quarter. The year-over-year increase in revenue in the first quarter reflects improved economic conditions and demand driven by the United States stimulus incentives related to HIT. As discussed above in the “Healthcare and Healthcare IT Industry”, we believe the HITECH incentives and the nation’s focus on improving the efficiency and quality of healthcare will create a period of increased HIT demand in the United States.
First quarter 2011 net earnings increased 28% to $64.6 million compared to $50.3 million the first quarter of 2010. Diluted earnings per share increased 27% to $0.75 compared to $0.59 in the first quarter of 2010. First quarter 2011 and 2010 net earnings and diluted earnings per share reflect the impact of accounting for stock-based compensation using the fair value method to measure and record expense for stock options, pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), 718,Stock Compensation. The effect of these expenses reduced the first quarter 2011 net earnings and diluted earnings per share by $4.6 million and $0.05, respectively, and first quarter 2010 net earnings and diluted earnings per share by $3.5 million and $0.04, respectively.
The growth in net earnings and diluted earnings per share was driven primarily by strong revenue growth and continued progress with our margin expansion initiatives, particularly leveraging R&D investments and controlling general and administrative expenses. Our first quarter 2011 operating margin was 19.1%, which is 160 basis points higher than the year-ago quarter and reflects continued progress towards our long-term goal of achieving 20% operating margins.
We had strong cash collections of receivables of $531.1 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $483.7 million in the first quarter of 2010. Days sales outstanding was 87 days in the first quarter of 2011 and fourth quarter of 2010 and 89 days in the first quarter of 2010, reflecting our improved cash collections. Operating cash flows for the first quarter of 2011 were strong at $126.5 million compared to $105.5 million in the first quarter of 2010.
12
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended April 2, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended April 3, 2010
The following table presents a summary of the operating information for the first quarters of 2011 and 2010:
| % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | 2011 | Revenue | 2010 | Revenue | % Change | |||||||||||||||
Revenues | ||||||||||||||||||||
| System sales | $ | 140,379 | 29 | % | $ | 116,951 | 27 | % | 20 % | |||||||||||
| Support and maintenance | 131,827 | 27 | % | 127,106 | 29 | % | 4 % | |||||||||||||
| Services | 209,167 | 42 | % | 179,939 | 42 | % | 16 % | |||||||||||||
| Reimbursed travel | 10,291 | 2 | % | 7,341 | 2 | % | 40 % | |||||||||||||
| Total revenues | 491,664 | 100 | % | 431,337 | 100 | % | 14 % | |||||||||||||
Costs of revenue | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs of revenue | 90,680 | 18 | % | 68,084 | 16 | % | 33 % | |||||||||||||
Total margin | 400,984 | 82 | % | 363,253 | 84 | % | 10 % | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sales and client service | 201,348 | 41 | % | 187,593 | 43 | % | 7 % | |||||||||||||
| Software development | 71,144 | 15 | % | 66,779 | 15 | % | 7 % | |||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 34,793 | 7 | % | 33,225 | 8 | % | 5 % | |||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 307,285 | 63 | % | 287,597 | 67 | % | 7 % | |||||||||||||
| Total costs and expenses | 397,965 | 81 | % | 355,681 | 82 | % | 12 % | |||||||||||||
| Operating earnings | 93,699 | 19.1 | % | 75,656 | 17.5 | % | 24 % | |||||||||||||
| Interest income (expense), net | 1,976 | 1,783 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 35 | (76 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Income taxes | (31,154 | ) | (27,077 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 64,556 | $ | 50,286 | 28 % | |||||||||||||||
Revenues & Backlog
Revenues increased 14% to $491.7 million for the first quarter 2011 from $431.3 million for the same period in 2010.
| • | System sales, which include revenues from the sale of software, technology resale (hardware and sublicensed software), deployment period licensed software upgrade rights, installation fees, transaction processing and subscriptions, increased 20% to $140.4 million for the first quarter of 2011 from $117.0 million for the same period in 2010. The increase in system sales was driven by a strong increase in domestic licensed software, technology resale and subscriptions. | ||
| • | Support and maintenance revenues increased 4% to $131.8 million during the first quarter of 2011 from $127.1 million during the same period in 2010. This increase was attributable to continued success at sellingCerner Millenniumapplications, implementing them at client sites and initiating billing for support and maintenance fees. We expect support and maintenance revenues will continue to grow as the base of installedCerner Millennium systems grow. | ||
| • | Services revenue, which includes professional services excluding installation, and managed services, increased 16% to $209.2 million from $179.9 million for the same period in 2010. This increase was driven by growth inCernerWorksSM managed services as a result of continued demand for our hosting services and an increase in professional services due to increased implementation activities. |
Contract backlog, which reflects new business bookings that have not yet been recognized as revenue, increased 21% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. This increase was driven by growth in new business bookings during the past four quarters, including continued strong levels of managed services and CernerITWorksservices bookings that typically have longer contract terms. A summary of our total backlog follows:
13
Table of Contents
| (In thousands) | April 2, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | ||||||
| Contract backlog | $ | 4,460,603 | $ | 4,285,267 | ||||
| Support and maintenance backlog | 665,734 | 654,913 | ||||||
| Total backlog | $ | 5,126,337 | $ | 4,940,180 | ||||
Costs of Revenue
Cost of revenues was 18% of total revenues in the first quarter of 2011, compared to 16% in the same period of 2010. The higher cost of revenues in 2011 was primarily driven by the increase in technology resale, which carries a higher cost of revenue. The cost of revenues includes the cost of reimbursed travel expense, third party consulting services and subscription content, computer hardware and sublicensed software purchased from hardware and software manufacturers for delivery to clients. It also includes the cost of hardware maintenance and sublicensed software support subcontracted to the manufacturers. Such costs, as a percent of revenues, typically have varied as the mix of revenue (software, hardware, maintenance, support, services and reimbursed travel) carrying different margin rates changes from period to period. Costs of revenues does not include the costs of our client service personnel who are responsible for delivering our service offerings, such costs are included in sales and client service expense.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses increased 7% to $307.3 million in the first quarter of 2011, compared with $287.6 million for the same period in 2010.
| • | Sales and client service expenses as a percent of total revenues were 41% in the first quarters of 2011, compared to 43% in the same period of 2010. These expenses increased 7% to $201.3 million in the first quarter of 2011, from $187.6 million in the same period of 2010. Sales and client service expenses include salaries of sales and client service personnel, depreciation and other expenses associated with ourCernerWorksmanaged service business, communications expenses, unreimbursed travel expenses, expense for share-based payments, sales and marketing salaries and trade show and advertising costs. The increase was primarily attributable to growth in managed services and professional services, slightly offset by a decrease in bad debt expense. | ||
| • | Software development expenses as a percent of revenue were 14.5% in the first quarter of 2011, compared to 15.5% in the same period of 2010. These expenses increased 7% to $71.1 million in the first quarter of 2011, from $66.8 million in the same period of 2010. Expenditures for software development in the first quarter of 2011 reflect continued development and enhancement of theCerner Millenniumplatform and software solutions and investments in new growth initiatives. Although these expenses increased in the first quarter of 2011, the reduction as a percentage of revenue reflects our ongoing efforts to control spending relative to revenue growth. Because of the strong platform we have built, we are able to continue advancing our solutions and investing in new solutions without large increases in spending. A summary of our total software development expense in the first quarters of 2011 and 2010 is as follows: |
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Software development costs | $ | 72,552 | $ | 71,457 | ||||
| Capitalized software costs | (20,171 | ) | (20,282 | ) | ||||
| Capitalized costs related to share-based payments | (295 | ) | (234 | ) | ||||
| Amortization of capitalized software costs | 19,058 | 15,838 | ||||||
| Total software development expense | $ | 71,144 | $ | 66,779 | ||||
14
Table of Contents
| General and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenues were 7%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared to 8% for the same period in 2010. These expenses increased 5% to $34.8 million in the first quarter of 2011, from $33.2 million for the same period in 2010. General and administrative expenses include salaries for corporate, financial and administrative staffs, utilities, communications expenses, professional fees, transaction gains or losses on foreign currency and expense for share based payments. The increase in general and administrative expenses was driven primarily by corporate personnel costs. |
Non-Operating Items
| • | Net interest income was $2.0 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to net interest income of $1.8 million in the first quarter of 2010. Interest income decreased slightly to $3.5 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $3.7 million for the same period in 2010. Interest expense decreased to $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $1.9 million for the same period in 2010, due to payments on our long-term debt. | ||
| • | Other income was $0.04 million in the first quarter of 2011, compared to other expense of $0.08 million for the same period in 2010. Other income and expense in the first quarter of 2010 included offsetting unrealized gains and losses included in earnings related to our auction rate securities and put-like settlement of $1.3 million. | ||
| • | Our effective tax rate was 32.6% for the first quarter of 2011 and 35.0% for the first quarter of 2010. This decrease was primarily due to the research and development tax credit being in effect for the first three months of 2011 while it was not effective for the first quarter of 2010 and a favorable foreign tax audit settlement during the current period. |
Operations by Segment
We have two operating segments, Domestic and Global. The Domestic segment includes revenue contributions and expenditures associated with business activity in the United States. The Global segment includes revenue contributions and expenditures linked to business activity in Aruba, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Cayman Islands, Chile, China (Hong Kong), Egypt, England, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Malaysia, Puerto Rico, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates.
The following table presents a summary of the operating information for the first quarters of 2011 and 2010:
| (in thousands) | 2011 | % of Revenue | 2010 | % of Revenue | % Change | |||||||||||||||
Domestic Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 420,990 | 100% | $ | 355,315 | 100% | 18% | |||||||||||||
| Costs of revenue | 77,925 | 19% | 61,241 | 17% | 27% | |||||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | 105,349 | 25% | 104,723 | 29% | 1% | |||||||||||||||
| Total costs and expenses | 183,274 | 44% | 165,964 | 47% | 10% | |||||||||||||||
| Domestic operating earnings | 237,716 | 56% | 189,351 | 53% | 26% | |||||||||||||||
Global Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | 70,674 | 100% | 76,022 | 100% | -7% | |||||||||||||||
| Costs of revenue | 12,755 | 18% | 6,843 | 9% | 86% | |||||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | 29,099 | 41% | 29,713 | 39% | -2% | |||||||||||||||
| Total costs and expenses | 41,854 | 59% | 36,556 | 48% | 14% | |||||||||||||||
| Global operating earnings | 28,820 | 41% | 39,466 | 52% | -27% | |||||||||||||||
| Other, net | (172,837 | ) | (153,161 | ) | 13% | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated operating earnings | $ | 93,699 | $ | 75,656 | 24% | |||||||||||||||
15
Table of Contents
Domestic Segment
| • | Revenues increased 18% to $421.0 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $355.3 million in the same period in 2010. This increase was driven by growth across all business models, but primarily in licensed software, managed services and professional services. | ||
| • | Cost of revenues was 19% of revenues in the first quarter of 2011, compared to 17% of revenues in the same period in 2010. The higher cost of revenues in 2011 was primarily driven by the increase in technology resale, which carries a higher cost of revenue. | ||
| • | Operating expenses increased 1% to $105.3 million in the first quarter of 2011, from $104.7 million in the same period in 2010, due primarily to growth in managed services and professional services expense, slightly offset by a decrease in bad debt expense. |
Global Segment
| • | Revenues decreased 7% to $70.7 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $76.0 million in the same period in 2010. Overall, declines in license software and professional service revenue were partially offset by an increase in technology resale and managed services revenue. The global revenue comparisons were also impacted by a change in estimates for certain contracts that rely on estimates as part of contract accounting during the first quarter of 2010. | ||
| • | Cost of revenues was 18% of revenues in the first quarter of 2011, compared with 9% in the same period of 2010. The higher cost of revenues in 2011 was primarily driven by the increase in technology resale, which carries a higher cost of revenue. | ||
| • | Operating expenses decreased 2% to $29.1 million for the first quarter of 2011, from $29.7 million in the same period in 2010, primarily due to a decrease in personnel-related professional services expense. |
Other, net
Operating results not attributed to an operating segment include expenses, such as software development, marketing, general and administrative, stock-based compensation and depreciation. These expenses increased 13% to $172.8 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $153.2 million in the same period in 2010. This increase was primarily due to growth in corporate personnel and software development costs.
16
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity is influenced by many factors, including the amount and timing of our revenues, our cash collections from our clients and the amounts we invest in software development, acquisitions and capital expenditures.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash, cash equivalents, which consist of money market funds, and short-term investments. At April 2, 2011, we had cash of $169.5 million, cash equivalents of $15.0 million and short-term investments of $426.3 million compared to cash of $170.3 million, cash equivalents of $44.2 million and short-term investments of $356.5 million at January 1, 2011.
Additionally, we maintain a $90 million, multi-year revolving credit facility, which provides an unsecured revolving line of credit for working capital purposes. Interest is payable at a rate based on prime or LIBOR plus a spread that varies depending on the net worth ratios maintained. The agreement provides certain restrictions on our ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets and pay dividends and contains certain net worth, current ratio and fixed charge coverage covenants, which as of April 2, 2011, we were in compliance with. The current agreement expires on May 31, 2013. As of April 2, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings under this agreement; however, we have $10.3 million of outstanding letters of credit, which reduced our available borrowing capacity to $79.7 million.
We believe that our present cash position, together with cash generated from operations, short-term investments and, if necessary, our available lines of credit, will be sufficient to meet anticipated cash requirements during 2011.
During the second quarter of 2008, Fujitsu Services Limited’s (Fujitsu) contract as the prime contractor in the National Health Service (NHS) initiative to automate clinical processes and digitize medical records in the Southern region of England was terminated by the NHS. This had the effect of automatically terminating our subcontract for the project. We are in dispute with Fujitsu regarding Fujitsu’s obligation to pay the amounts comprised of accounts receivable and contracts receivable related to that subcontract, and we are working with Fujitsu to resolve these issues based on processes provided for in the contract. Part of that process requires resolution of disputes between Fujitsu and the NHS regarding the contract termination. As of April 2, 2011, it remains unlikely that the matter will be resolved in the next 12 months. Therefore these receivables have been classified as long-term and represent the significant majority of other long-term assets as of the first quarter ended April 2, 2011. While the ultimate collectability of the receivables pursuant to this process is uncertain, we believe that we have valid and equitable grounds for recovery of such amounts and that collection of recorded amounts is probable.
The following table summarizes our cash flows in the first three months of 2011 and 2010:
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities | $ | 126,501 | $ | 105,503 | ||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | (190,265 | ) | (122,474 | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | 31,145 | 16,540 | ||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | 2,675 | (1,085 | ) | |||||
| Total change in cash and cash equivalents | (29,944 | ) | (1,516 | ) | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 214,511 | 241,723 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 184,567 | $ | 240,207 | ||||
| Free cash flow (non-GAAP) | $ | 84,663 | $ | 52,879 | ||||
Cash from Operating Activities
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Cash collections from clients | $ | 531,089 | $ | 483,727 | ||||
| Cash paid to employees and suppliers and other | (389,194 | ) | (321,839 | ) | ||||
| Cash paid for interest | (348 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||
| Cash paid for taxes, net of refund | (15,046 | ) | (56,313 | ) | ||||
| Total cash from operations | $ | 126,501 | $ | 105,503 | ||||
17
Table of Contents
Cash flow from operations increased in the first three months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010 due primarily to the increase in cash impacting earnings and cash provided by working capital. During the first three months of 2011 and 2010, we received total client cash collections of $531.1 million and $483.7 million, respectively, of which 3% and 4%, respectively, were received from third party client financing arrangements and non-recourse payment assignments. Days sales outstanding was 87 days in the first quarter of 2011 and fourth quarter of 2010 and 89 days in the first quarter of 2010, reflecting our improved cash collections. Revenues provided under support and maintenance agreements represent recurring cash flows. Support and maintenance revenues increased 4% in the first three months of 2011 compared to the first three months of 2010. We expect these revenues to continue to grow as the base of installedCerner Millenniumsystems grows.
Cash from Investing Activities
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Capital purchases | $ | (21,372 | ) | $ | (32,108 | ) | ||
| Capitalized software development costs | (20,466 | ) | (20,516 | ) | ||||
| Purchases of investments, net of maturities | (145,199 | ) | (53,131 | ) | ||||
| Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | — | (14,486 | ) | |||||
| Other, net | (3,228 | ) | (2,233 | ) | ||||
| Total cash flows from investing activities | $ | (190,265 | ) | $ | (122,474 | ) | ||
Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of capital spending and our short-term investment activities. Capital spending consists of capitalized equipment purchases primarily to support growth in ourCernerWorksmanaged services business, capitalized land, building and improvement purchases to support our facilities requirements and capitalized spending to support our ongoing software development initiatives. Capital spending in 2011 is expected to increase from our 2010 levels, however we also expect strong levels of free cash flow.
In addition, during the first quarter 2010, we completed our acquisition of IMC Health Care, Inc. for approximately $14.5 million, net of the cash acquired.
Cash from Financing Activities
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Long-term debt repayments | $ | (114 | ) | $ | (219 | ) | ||
| Cash from option exercises (including excess tax benefits) | 32,039 | 15,243 | ||||||
| Other, net | (780 | ) | 1,516 | |||||
| Total cash flows from financing activities | $ | 31,145 | $ | 16,540 | ||||
Our primary financing obligations are long-term debt repayments. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we commenced payment on the first of seven equal annual installments on our 5.54% Great Britain Pound denominated Note Agreement as well as on the first of four equal annual installments on our 6.42% Series B Senior Notes. Based on current exchange rates, we expect our debt repayments related to these notes to approximate $25 million per year through 2012 and approximately $15 million per year from 2013 through 2015.
Free Cash Flow
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities | $ | 126,501 | $ | 105,503 | ||||
| Capital purchases | (21,372 | ) | (32,108 | ) | ||||
| Capitalized software development costs | (20,466 | ) | (20,516 | ) | ||||
| Free cash flow (non-GAAP) | $ | 84,663 | $ | 52,879 | ||||
Free cash flow increased $31.8 million in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010, which we believe reflects continued strengthening of our earnings quality. Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure used by management along with GAAP results to analyze our earnings quality and overall cash generation of the business.
18
Table of Contents
The presentation of free cash flow is not meant to be considered in isolation, as a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results and investors should be aware that non-GAAP measures have inherent limitations and should be read only in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. Free cash flow may also be different from similar non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies and may not be comparable to similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation. We believe free cash flow is important to enable investors to better understand and evaluate our ongoing operating results and allows for greater transparency in the review of our overall financial, operational and economic performance.
19
Table of Contents
| Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
No material changes.
| Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
| a) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report (the Evaluation Date). They have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities and would be disclosed on a timely basis. The CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed, and are effective, to give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. They have also concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||
| b) | There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended April 2, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting. | ||
| c) | The Company’s management, including its CEO and CFO, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at that reasonable assurance level. However, the Company’s management can provide no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting can prevent all errors and all fraud under all circumstances. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been or will be detected. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. |
20
Table of Contents
Part II. Other Information
| Item 6. | Exhibits |
| (a) | Exhibits |
| 10(a) | Exhibit A Severance Matrix, effective April 1, 2011, to the Cerner Corporation 2005 Enhanced Severance Pay Plan as Amended and Restated, dated August 15, 2010. | |
| 31.1 | Certification of Neal L. Patterson, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 31.2 | Certification of Marc G. Naughton, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document | |
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
21
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| CERNER CORPORATION Registrant | ||||
| April 29, 2011 | By: | /s/Marc G. Naughton | ||
| Date | Marc G. Naughton | |||
| Chief Financial Officer (duly authorized officer and principal financial officer) | ||||
22