The Company has been able to control the availability and the cost of scrap to some degree by producing its own shredded and cut grade scrap through its scrap processing division. This division, coupled with its local scrap purchasing program, supplied over 50% of the Company’s scrap requirements during the first six months of fiscal 2001. Conversion cost includes labor, energy, maintenance materials, and supplies used to convert raw materials into billets and billets into shapes. Conversion cost per ton for the Louisiana operations increased by 27% for the quarter and 20% for the first six month period compared to the respective periods of last year. The impact of the highly unusual increase in the price of power and natural gas was compounded by an increase in fixed cost per ton caused by the reduced mode of operations. In the fourth fiscal quarter of last year, the Company undertook a major project designed to improve operating efficiencies and effectiveness in addition to implementing immediate cost control strategies. The impact of these initiatives along with the impact of an aggressive cost control strategy are presently being realized but the impact is far less than the unfavorable increase in cost due to the increase in fuel prices. During the current fiscal quarter, the Company realized several significant cost control and operational enhancements. First, record high productivity was realized in the Louisiana melting operations. Second, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company realized a nearly $500,000 improvement in the cost of additives, alloys, and fluxes utilized in its melting operations through a combination of consumption and price savings. Third, aggregate fixed cost at the operations in Louisiana decreased $1.3 million or 18% and $3.4 million or 25% over the respective three and six month periods ended March 31, 2000. Excluding the fuel component, variable cost per ton in the melting operations decreased 12% and 5%, respectively, when compared to the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2000; this saved approximately $0.4 in the second quarter. The Tennessee rolling mill experienced a 43% and 41% increase in conversion cost for the quarter and six month periods, respectively. Compounding the impact of natural gas prices was a decrease in production that increased fixed cost per ton and an increase in maintenance spending on certain equipment. In the third fiscal quarter, the Company will install new capital equipment that is expected to significantly decrease the maintenance spending as well as down time related to such spending. In addition, it is anticipated that the new capital will improve production reliability, favorably impacting shipments as more customers can reliably order products based on production schedules. Fixed costs have improved by $0.3 million over the second fiscal quarter of last year as a result of aggressive cost control measures. The higher prices for power and natural gas are expected to continue for the near-term. Based on the current quarter cost for electricity and natural gas and the Company’s estimated consumption for the next twelve months, a one percent change in each component would impact annualized earnings by approximately $150,000 and $100,000, respectively. The Company continues to critically evaluate the cost effectiveness of continued operation of certain operating assets, their mode of operation and the impact on inventories and cost, and the general business environment in which each facility operates. Such analysis includes produce versus buy decisions for the semifinished product billets in light of skyrocketing fuel cost. C. Selling, General and Administrative Expense Selling, general and administrative expense decreased for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2001 by 7% and 8%, respectively, compared to the prior year periods as a result of cost reduction programs designed to minimize spending and reduce overhead cost. D. Income Taxes In fiscal 1998, the Company recorded an adjustment to its net deferred tax asset valuation allowance and, subsequently, provides for income taxes at the 35% statutory tax rate, although its cash tax requirement is limited to the 2% alternative minimum tax because of its available net operating loss tax benefits. As of March 31, 2001, the Company has $8.1 million of recorded net deferred tax assets. No tax benefit was recognized related to the Company’s current year operating loss. The Company periodically assesses the carrying value of its net deferred tax asset utilizing many factors, including changing market conditions. Such assessments may result in positive or negative adjustments to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance in the future that would ultimately affect the results of operations. Page 13 |