Which stocks detracted significantly from the Fund’s performance during the semi-annual period?
During the semi-annual period, the equity portion of the Fund was hurt most by not owning e-commerce giant Amazon.com, which posted strong gains during the semi-annual period. However, the equity portion of the Fund’s strategy is to invest lower on the capitalization spectrum. It does not typically invest in giant, mega-cap companies. Also, the equity portion of the Fund’s positions in dental supply manufacturer and distributor Dentsply Sirona and tobacco company British American Tobacco detracted. Each of these companies’ stocks experienced double-digit declines during the semi-annual period, hurt by weaker than expected operating results.
Did the equity portion of the Fund make any significant purchases or sales?
During the semi-annual period, a position in Broadridge Financial Solutions, a technology services provider to the financial services industry, was added to the equity portion of the Fund because of its consistently strong history of growth in operations and stock price.
Among those positions eliminated from the equity portion of the Fund during the semi-annual period were medical waste management services provider Stericycle and software supplier to the health care industry Cerner. We exited each of these positions due to its weaker than expected operating results and what we believed were its diminished long-term growth prospects.
Were there any notable changes in the equity portion of the Fund’s weightings during the six-month period?
There were no material changes in the equity portion of the Fund’s sector weightings during the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, though its allocation to the utilities sector did decrease modestly.
How was the equity portion of the Fund positioned relative to its benchmark index at the end of June 2018?
As of June 30, 2018, the equity portion of the Fund was overweighted relative to the S&P 500® Index in the industrials, health care, materials and consumer staples sectors. The equity portion of the Fund was underweighted relative to the S&P 500® Index in the financials, information technology and utilities sectors and was rather neutrally weighted relative to the S&P 500® Index in the consumer discretionary and real estate sectors on the same date. The equity portion of the Fund had no allocation at all to the energy and telecommunication services sectors on June 30, 2018.
What was the duration strategy of the fixed income portion of the Fund?
Duration positioning in the fixed income portion of the Fund contributed positively, albeit modestly, to its performance relative to the Bloomberg Barclays Index during the semi-annual period. We kept the fixed income portion of the Funds duration moderately shorter than that of the Bloomberg Barclays Index, which proved beneficial as interest rates rose during the semi-annual period. Duration is a measure of the fixed income portion of the Fund’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates.
Which fixed income market segments most significantly affected Fund performance?
An overweighted allocation relative to the Bloomberg Barclays Index in corporate bonds and a corresponding underweighted allocation to U.S. Treasuries detracted from the fixed income portion of the Fund’s relative results most. During calendar year 2017, corporate bonds had performed well, adding significant value to the fixed income portion of the Fund’s relative performance. We anticipated that technicals, or supply/demand factors, would continue to support corporate bonds into 2018. However, instead of the reduced supply scenario expected, a number of companies issued bonds as they rushed to get ahead of the Federal Reserve’s (the Fed) interest rate hikes. Also, oil was widely expected to remain in the $50 per barrel range. However, by March 2018, oil prices were in the mid-$60 per barrel range, stoking inflation expectations and feeding a perception the Fed may become more aggressive in raising short-term interest rates this year. Further, investors balked at taking on more credit risk amidst the broad equity market sell-off that began in early February 2018. All told then, during the semi-annual period, investment grade corporate bonds posted negative absolute returns that underperformed those of U.S. Treasuries, even as fundamentals within the sector, including low default rates and strong balance sheets, remained healthy.
Conversely, the fixed income portion of the Fund’s exposure to high yield corporate bonds, which are not a component of the Bloomberg Barclays Index, proved beneficial, as this sector posted modestly positive returns that significantly outpaced the Bloomberg Barclays Index. The fixed income portion of the Fund’s underweight to international sovereign debt added value as well, given that this was one of the worst performing sectors in the fixed income market during the semi-annual period.